^■vS- 
 
 ^, 
 
 <9 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 0« 
 
 ^.y 
 
 / 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 /APPLIED 
 
 IIVMQE . Inc 
 
 1653 East M n StrttI 
 noch«st»r, NV 14609 USA 
 Phofit 716/482 0300 
 Fax 716/288 5089 
 
 e 1983. Apptiad Imag*. Inc . Ml ntgMt HaMivtd 
 

 i& 
 
 <s 
 
 CIHM 
 Microfiche 
 Series 
 (l\/lonographs) 
 
 ICIVIH 
 
 Collection de 
 microfiches 
 (monographies) 
 
 Canadian Instituta for Historical Microroproductlont / Inatitut Canadian da microraprodMctiona hiatoriquaa 
 
 nn 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notts / Notes techniques et bibliographiquat 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original 
 copy available for filming. Features of this copy which 
 may be bibliographicaliy unique, which may altsi sny 
 of the images in the reproduction, or which may 
 significantly change the usual method of filming, are 
 checked below. 
 
 □ Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 j~~l Covers damaged/ 
 
 D 
 
 Couverture endommagte 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture resteurie et/ou pelliculAe 
 
 □ Cover title missing/ 
 Le 
 
 n 
 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 titre de couverture manque 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gAographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Relit avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 La reliure serrAe peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distorsion le long de la marge intArieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may appear 
 within the text. Whenever possible, these have 
 been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certainat peges blanches aiouties 
 lors d'une resteuration apparatssent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela *tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pet M f ilm*et. 
 
 Additional comments / 
 Commentaires suppl4meniaires; 
 
 L'Institut a ^nicrofilmt le meilleur exemplaire qu'il 
 lui a M possible de se procurer. Les details de cet 
 exemplaire qui sont peut-4tre uniques du point de vue 
 bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image 
 reproduite. ou qui peuvent exiger une modification 
 dans la mithode normale de f ilmage sont indiqu^ 
 ci-dessous. 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 □ Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommag^ 
 
 □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaur^s et/ou pellicultes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d«color«es, tacheties ou piquAes 
 
 □ Pages detached/ 
 Pages d«tach«es 
 
 0Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of print varies/ 
 Quality intgale de I'impresiion 
 
 □ Continuous peginetion/ 
 Pagination continue 
 
 □ Includes index(es)/ 
 Comprend un (des) index 
 
 Title on header taken from:/ 
 Le titre de t'entlte provient: 
 
 □ Title page of issue/ 
 Page de titre de la livraison 
 
 □ Caption of issue/ 
 Titre de depart de la 
 
 D 
 
 livraison 
 
 Masthead/ 
 
 G4n«rique (piriodiques) de la livraison 
 
 This Item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document tit film# au taux de rMuction indiqu* ci dessous 
 
 lOX 14W <>w 
 
 tax 
 
 1«X 
 
 X 
 
 ;ox 
 
 rs* 
 
 »» 
 
 y 
 
 i«x 
 
 i9X 
 
 a* 
 
I'll 
 
 St 
 
 ^ vue 
 
 on 
 t 
 
 The copy filmed here hes been reproduced thenks 
 to the generoeity of: 
 
 Nationel Library of Canada 
 
 The images appearing here are tite best quality 
 possible considering the condition and iegibiiitv 
 of the original copy and in Iteeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol -^ (meaning "CON- 
 TilMUED"), or the symbol y (meaning "END"), 
 whichever appiies. 
 
 l\Aaps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 L'exemplaire film* fut reproduit grAce A la 
 g6n4rositA de: 
 
 Bibliothdqui Mionale du Canada 
 
 Les images suivantes ont At* reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetA de I'exdmplaire film«, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Les exemplaires origlnaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprim^e sont fiimis en commen^ant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 derniAre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 origlnaux sont filmAs en commenpant par la 
 premiire page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la derni*re page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparattra sur la 
 dernlAre image de cheque microfiche, seion le 
 cas: le symbols —^ signifie 'A SUIVRE ", le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN ". 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 fllmAs A des taux de reduction diffArents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul clichA, 11 est film* A partir 
 de Tangle supArieur gauche, de gauche i droite, 
 et de haut en bas, en pranant le nombre 
 d'images nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mdthode. 
 
 n 
 
 }2t 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 6 
 
 6 
 
1^ 
 
 NATItlNAL IJBRABY 
 
 CANADA 
 
 vmurrrHkovn nation \lr 
 
 3 
 
 /y 
 
 AMENDED COPY. 
 
 ARGUMENT OF COUNSEL Oy 
 
 BISrORE TUB 
 
 I] 
 
 lJli\ 
 
 IN TlIK CASE Of 
 
 J. C. RYKERT, ESQ., M. P., 
 
 In re Grant of certain Timber Limits In the North-Weet Territoriea to ons 
 
 John Adams in April, 1882. 
 
 Mr. MoDouoall.— I intimated to the Committco, at its last moctinir. after it 
 was announced that no further iwidenco would be given, that I was inclined to think 
 1 could add little, If anything, to the explanations already made under oath and had 
 advised my client t.at he could safely let his earn* rest upon that evidence alone ; 
 but as he was of opinion that there was some mif..w)piehenHion out of doors if not in 
 this comin ttee-room, as to the position and ihe rights and liabilities of Members of 
 Parliament and the uidicial functions and powers of the House of Commons and 
 that It might be weh to examine these Questions before the Committee, I deemed it 
 my duty to suggest another si ttin^f for tliat purpose. I promised at the same time 
 that I would not weary the Committee. I believe I limited myself to one hour 
 
 10 enaole me to do justice to the accused momber, and keep faith with the 
 Committee, i have co lected and digested a few authorities, Englisli and Canadian 
 Tf this Sao "°''*"'^'*°^ *''^'"' "'^ "'"P'^' «»ffl«i«ni to justify an immediate dismissal 
 
 The first question which presents itself to the Committee seems to be this : What 
 
 of SllnZ^V TU n'"r^''/,f'r ^'""°''.' *"^ ^'*^'*'''- *'«'"'nitted against the Ihw 
 «L KiS J lu ^Y ^'''r ''^ ««^l''«"^« does not t^l us ; dooi not nTme or specify 
 any breach of that law. It savs •« that the attention of the House has been culled to 
 certain documents, le ters and statemonts published du.ing the present Session in 
 the Votes and Proceed ngs of this House," * ♦ ♦ .. r^,„fi ^^ ^^e connec or, of 
 John J,'h«.; es liykert • &e., " with a grant of certain timber limits in the .North- 
 West lerritories. It is not alleged or proved that John Charles Rykert published 
 l..?!2.'"'i*.7 T «""^"'n«"g "r roflocing upon the House of Commons: If the 
 Kf- , ZV •* "*"'"^'' :' P*' Hnniont, concerning his own business affairs, 
 written out. of Session, and making no reference whatever to the House of Commons 
 past present or future are not ;>«M/«Aerf by him, upon what principle, according to 
 what precedent, does the House of Commons take cognir.ance of such letters and 
 S?/- & ?»*''"••»*'"" "f <]'«'"? Kvary lawyer knows that it is not the man 'who 
 wri/M but the man who publishrs, a hM who exposes himself to an action. " In a 
 
 frr. j!. ' iT^' ^''"■'*i*' ">**'•"■" «"y.«vi'l«noe CHM be given of its coaUmt*, 
 prima facie evidence must be given of a Dubllcalicm hu the d,'f.<nda«* " 
 
 Tlie private t)U9lness letters of Mr. Itykert, pubJishtHl by Ortler of the House, 
 were never published by him, nor with his assent nor connivance, until the Olobt 
 newspnpor made them public without his authority, in it« Issue of the Hth of KeU- 
 
.r^v 
 
 
 2 
 
 ruary laet. Sir Richard Cartwright thereupon made his motion to hand them down 
 to posterity in the Votes and Proceedings of the House of Commons. I submit that 
 Sir Richard and the Olobe^ and not Mr. Rykert, are responsible for all the evil con- 
 sequences of publication. They were privat* ; they were pei-sonal ; the subject-matter 
 was not within the cognizance of any criminal court, and from beginning to end 
 there is not even a reference to the House of Commons, its functions or its jurisdio- 
 tions, or its poswible or probable action, in the matter. I submit, therefore, that you 
 have no constitutional or legal authority to onqui/e into, or pronounce judgment, 
 upon Mr. Rykert in this case. 
 
 It is apparently assumed that the Canadian House of Commons has been endowed 
 with authority to enquire into the private busines atfaiig of one of its members, and 
 if it thinks proper, to expel him ft-om his seat, and thereby deprive his constitiienta 
 of his voice and i^oto in this House. 1 respectfully dissent from that proposition, for 
 the f '.lowing among other reasons: — 
 
 1. The Parliament of Canada is a new creation. It is not old enough to claim 
 ancient, customary, or consuetudinary powers or privileges. It has the powers which 
 are expressly given to to it by Statute, and those also which are necessary for the 
 preservation of order and the pioper conduct of business. In what section or clause 
 of the British North America Act is the House of Commons endowed with power to 
 expel, by the vote of the majority, one of its members? I have not hoen able to find it. 
 You may say the power of expulsion, for adequate cause, is a necessary incident of 
 every independent legislative body. I am disposed to assent to that proposition. 
 But can it be pretended that private letters written out of session, by a lawyer, who 
 happens to be a member of Parliament, to a client on private professional business, 
 are adoqiate cause ? I vontui>e to assert that thev are not. I venture to assert that 
 no precedent can bo found in the ])arliamontary history of England since the Revolu- 
 tion to warrant expulsion for professional and private correspondence such as thi«. 
 The boat authority on this subject is Sir Krskine May, and I will take the liberty of 
 quoting two or three passages from his admirable book on Parliamentary Practice 
 in Kn^and (pp. 60, (51 of the Edition of 1873) : "No power exercised by the Com- 
 mons 18 nioio undoubted than that of expelling a member from the House as a 
 ptinishment for (jrave offences : yet expulsion, though it vacates the seat of a member, 
 and a new writ is immediately issued, does not create any disability to serve again 
 in Parliament." After referring to the oases of Wilkes and Walpole, Sir Erskino 
 May concludes with these words : " But all of these cases can only be regarded as 
 examples of an excess of their jurisdiction by the Commons; for one House of Parlia- 
 ment cannot create a disability unknown to the law." 
 
 If, therofoio, I were to admit, which I do not, that the Canadian Parliament and 
 the Canadian House of Commons now have, and may exercise all the powers oUimed 
 and exercised by the English Parliament and Commons in 1867, 1 would demand 
 IVom this committee a declaration that no evidence had been produced of any 
 "offence" cognizable by Parliament, or either House thereof, which had affected or 
 could affect tho seat of the honorable member. 
 
 But, Mr. Chairman, it will be ray duty to point out in this case some Important 
 distinctions between the English House of Commons, and our Oanadinn House in the 
 matter of " privilege, immunities and powoi-s." Theirs are to be found in the deci- 
 sions and precodojits of former rarliamenta ; ouis are conferred by an Act of th« 
 Imperial Parliament, passed in 1867, as amended by the same authority in 1875. 
 This amendment was made to remove uorbts as to the power of the Canadian Par- 
 liametit, even to pass a Statute, to define its " privileges, powers or immunities," The 
 following is tiie law as it st-inds to-day, and no English precedents from the time of 
 the Stuarts, or even »ho Georges, will over-ride the letter of this law. The new sec- 
 tion in the Act of 1875 reads as follows;— 
 
 " The PrtviloirOB. immunilioa unil nnwnra tn \w hnld nninvoii nml <>vapn!aa<l K< 
 
 nnlQved find BX&V...-.-.^..i -.-.- 
 
 the Senate and by the House of ('ommons, and by the members thereof respectively, 
 shall \w such ns are from time to time defined by Act of Parliament of Canada, but 
 so that any Act of the Parliament of Canada, defining such privileges, immunltlw 
 
 'f 
 
'f 
 
 and powere shall not confer any privileges, immunities or powers exceeding those at 
 the passing of such Act held, enjoyed and exercised by the Commons House of Pac- 
 liament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and by the members 
 thereof. 
 
 Now, I submit that this Imperial enactment is, in form and effect, prospective 
 m Its operation. It declares that the powers, &c., of the House of Commons nhall be 
 such as are from time to time defined by Act of the Parliament of Canada— not such 
 as may have been assumed to exist in the past, or such as may have been " defined " 
 by any former Act. It contemplates the passing of an Act for the purpose of 
 defining, for it limits these powers and privileges to such as may be held, &c. by 
 the 'Commons Houne of Parliament" of England. I am not aware that the Cana- 
 dian Farimment has passed any Act since 1876, '• defining " the powei-s of the House 
 of Commons, and conferring upon that body the power of expelling a member for 
 acts or transactions in his profession or business, permissablo in the eye ot the law 
 and entirely outside of the parliamentary arena. ' 
 
 As a matter of fact no Act has since been passed by this Parliament defiiiinir the 
 powers and privileges of the House of Commons. I am told by one authority that 
 the Revised Statutes of 1886 meet the objection. [ submit that there is no "defini- 
 tion in the Revised Statutes of ' privileges, immunities and powers to be held " &c 
 which are not to exceed those held and enjoyed by the English House of Commons' 
 There is simply a revision or digest of the Act of 1868 (31 Vic, c. 23 s 1) 
 
 The section reads as follows: — » • /• 
 
 " The Senate and the House of , Commons, respectively, and the membei-s thereof 
 respectively, shall hold, enjoy ana exercise such and the like privileges, immunities 
 and powers as, at the time of the passing of ' The British North America Act 18(17 ' 
 were hold, enjoyed and exorcised hy the Commons House of Parliament of the United 
 Kingdom, and by the members thereof, so far as the same are consistent with and not 
 repugnant to the said Act (the B. N. A. Act of 1867), and also such privileges, immu- 
 nities and powers as are from time to time defined by Act of the Partiameiri of Canada 
 not exceeding those at the time of the passing of such Act held, enjoyed and exercised 
 by the Commons House ol Parliament of the United Kingdom and by the members 
 thereof, respectively." (R. S. C. cap. 11, s. 3.) 
 
 It is to be observed that this revision, if we are to treat it as a " defining " Act 
 was passed subsequently to the amendment by the Imperial Parliament of 1875* 
 and therefore, under the authority and subject to the provisions of that Imperial Act' 
 1 submit that section 3 of the revision of 1886 is not, and does not assume to bo 
 ?ofr" mu" ?' P'>)J'J1''». P'iviloges, Ac, under the authority of the Imperial Act of 
 187S. The Act of Parliament "defining " the powers and privileges of the Canadian 
 House of Commons is yet to bo passed. 
 
 IT ^"^^L"™ content to argue this case upon the hypothesis that the Cimadian 
 House ot Commons has the same power in respect to the expulsion of its membe;s 
 as those now claimed and exercised ay the English House of Commons. 
 
 I submit, then, upon the authority of the latest case, that of James Sadlier, that 
 a grave ortence," to use the definition of Sir Erskine May, must be charirod and 
 proved against a member before his seat can be attacked. 
 
 In the case of James Satiiier, then member for Tipporary, which is the lateH 
 precedent supplied to us by the English House of Commons, Mr. EifKgerald then 
 Attornoy-Genoral loi- Ireland, laid down the rule of procedure in such cases as 
 tollows: 
 
 J iF'V"? ^*" hi^fiv.t) the House pionor evidence of the following facts— that on 
 the 4th July informations were nworn l.efore a magistrate against Jamos>Sadlier and 
 that the ottence sworn against him was not felony or a misdemeanor, but that of 
 conspiring, with his deceased brother, John Sadlier, to cheat and defraud iho public by 
 means of false representations, &o. They had also this ovideme, that on the 4th 
 July, in ccmsequonce of thUswoin infoimuiiiin. a wurrun.t ws- i-sufst! air'ssssat Jjinss'-i 
 Badiier,' Ac. " that bills of indictment were presented against him to the Grand 
 Jury, and on the ovldonoe of three wllnesses a true bill was found against him, and 
 
'^^tZtnTj:n-l^^^^^ the Jucl,o of A«.ize 
 
 Vol. CXLIII ) npp.chcMiHion, &(.." (Sec English Hansard of 1856 
 
 Attorney Gonorul among >, ^ t hlnln afZT U Z% ''*"'"'^. !^ ''"^'""^ ^he 
 any thing before them " '' thit fhrMrn, .A . '"**/he House could not "act upon 
 
 affected by election p^titonn dV, md 1 Klf to"/'!;^^ ^««J'«^'^ ^««««t« 
 
 once exercised and n mMne ca^.s Li lit . i ^T^ i''*^^"'' "^ "'^ P">«^«r ^hich it 
 HmitH, and had dccid d ZfinT . ! .^^ Lad conhnod that power within narrow 
 like legal oSrtr,. T ZeVZ"^^^^^^^^ '"^ ^ «"'^«'* by something 
 
 the constitution, the Ifou e S not to fvl l/^ ''^'-'T '''"''' '''•"' ''"^'"fe' ''^'^^-^ ^o 
 liminary enquiry-without e tWc >.?,.* V'^ a judgment without a proper pro- 
 
 tantamount to it " ^ aconfession of guilt or an amountol legil evidence 
 
 some 
 pies 
 of th 
 
 can only exclude or ex, cl t lo n fbi Hom, .1^.? r^^ T ^-n 'i'^"^*^'"' this House 
 land or tor Hon.o ^V^n,i':^^:\J;:^:;^^^^ «^^"'>'-hed by the law of the 
 
 fled from iuHtice. ^ ^'" ^" "PP'^hend him, ho was expelled as having 
 
 fled from justice. 
 
 Now, there is not 
 has 
 Adam 
 
 of HC- 
 
 <SSiS'.;;"';;r;;r^':n;:?'':;*''"' ^'^ "^■^•!'^^'^ "--^er i„ the present case 
 
 ms. l^.rlia,M?>nt I ^ lin' ,; Hf;;;:7i,i^^^^ 1".'^'"^^' '^'"^"-^ '« '"••'' client, 
 
 L'^sion. and, as wHlu, I v„ T "^^ '•""l"'*'^'^ t-mvespondenco, out 
 
 end, to the act on o I>u- lianu t r f \ ^^ v^ ref,.rence, from beginni, g to 
 
 of his seat in he Co mn s i '-1 1 1 ' ''""*•"' '"' '"«»«""*'« '^i' the writcrV , 
 
 constitutional Zi^Trir ''^^1^^''^ J^ P"^«»- '""» " function wiic 
 
 eason 
 h the 
 
 constitutional Acts have not assi^; i^ t '^ n ''''''1'' '"" ".^".'"'tion which the 
 
 administrationof justicea'cl^rirnl. 1 J\'T'y T' ''•'''' "^'^'<" ""^ <h« 
 a .ucrely local or ,ri e . Lt. 1 ' 1'''^ I'-'^'nd.aMd ge,.erally»l| mattcrsof 
 
 anicrelylocalor'nrivaenatnr i • ''"'"''"'r^ 
 
 The attcnp to ^talVi ; ' ' "hh^ "'^''^ ""*''« "^' ^'^'^ P"rlian,e„t. 
 
 whom we enir, St wi h lU ^ jl' 7::'" '*'" ''?.""^^' ojrrespondence of those 
 
 where our general la vV a, n ,, 1^ ' cpiosenting us i„ the national council, 
 
 «»re^ave^bol<l, ™;:;,;;;;:::;;:'!;|,:-,|^^ taxes levied and expended. iJ 
 
 aiiogl:'';;!:.^!"!!:;;; ^:r ';^.;n:r rs;;:; ^;r K-.r " "-'^^"^'^ --r "• '^"^ 
 
 ParlinmcPt. Moreover all the I -i ... ! , • V 7 "' "' ''^'^''•'"•' » member of this 
 
 I'cfore th.s PaHian.;n; . I '" Vl "'^velv re /h ^^^^^^ ""' •""''^' '"'^•"^' 
 
 Hcattered broadcast over his CM.sf tuen. . m.,Vi i •' ' '^ ^"' ,*'l'l'oi>cnts, and 
 
 and character, the ei.MM,,," re m , M^^^^ '\'^'' '"" '<".'7UMge of their oxislencn 
 
 o.. any fornu.; ..ccas io Ar ' I ave « Wi ll!''"'''' ^'•'' » '"''^r' "'".inrity than 
 
 mentary annals furnish us wiil.Vv.- i *V' ''"•"''' "* ^'"""1"? Our parlia- 
 
 andMciven^ie^uv tl^:\;:;;:,^^^^^^^^ The expulsions otclriHtie 
 
 his persecutors under lm'ou d ' , .. I " ' i> <'Kcn/.ie. lie lived to see most of 
 
 tion especially 1 1 u tor Hv ..•'"*' ""''"* T''''''^ ""^ '•*" l''"'liament. Persccu- 
 would nVver Imv. u.i ';,!,: ^ I! '^ '•"»'"''"">^ "!!'' '"""^•"-^ "'"t •." 
 
 those and other ,MVce en s 1 ( . I m i. V'''*"'r' "'' ''.'.•"''^•"' ""'^'''"- '''''>'» 
 
 even censure, in the ,rm,nt cZ J ' '"""'■'" '".P'T'"'''. t''«lt expul 
 
 .....u.. '."J .l"^«'*c'>\<»'<c, will KChd your victim back to tho-e 
 
 V, iiuv ui lu-y HHn.no.i, ImiI mucii greater, 
 
 dsion, or 
 hu'lU with » 
 
16th AprU, 1890. 
 
 lengthy HpJijhi"*^ '"""'" """' P'^J^"""' ^^ «''' ^'»''""» Harcourt in „n able and 
 
 faIselytlreVod^^hil?Swr?tl l^'^' ^««^- "f« '«**-- 
 
 comments Hi«r«nn in Ik ^ntten by Mr. Parnell, a member of thin IIouho, and the 
 
 (learned n breach of piivilom boc«n»Blh/H..,.. L.T. T ' ' .""K."" "'" *" •» 
 
 go by without „,.ki?g 1. ,r;,,bP of !; m^;;r ''°'' ""°"""' ■"" "^ ""■•"' y»»™ '° 
 
 the puniHhmont .,f the brtZlu "TnrS^^ opportunity for 
 
 (Op,«,mtionohwrMl T,™ L?. •"""'"■"'' 'J' '"'".»" " l«l»"b"o.l ..ml forgery. 
 
 L\ \ belie,, f,;rfi,iJlz,;:,;!;; :;;;,',= r?; r;ti,'l:.rri.!!;i:lr„ sr- 
 
 iiiem 
 honor 
 
 roach of jtrivik-ire Hhoiild li 
 
 O !)!' 
 
 'Jlltltlf iliul 
 
 " ana ctignity of the lloubo, had thought that this i 
 
 pro- 
 
 if ihv jliiriorartiu 
 
 in hJN jtoal for the 
 
 anguage won a breach of 
 
« 
 
 Ealebfenteke^'''^^'^^"'' *^^^' '^*'' *''*' ^^^^^ *^*^ "P°° ''^'*'** '*°"*'® ^''°"''' 
 T^e Attorn^-General moved an amendment in the following terras:— 
 
 iQ«u *A •," ^}^^^?^^^ declines to treat the publication in the Time* newspaper of the 
 .. "^E "A' ^^^^' **^* (fo'ged) letter purporting to have been written by Mr. Par- 
 
 nell, and the comments thereon, as a breach of privilege," 
 
 After a vote on the main motion, which was defeated by a majority of forty the 
 
 amendment was adopted without a division, the woi-d "forged " being inserted at 
 
 the demand of the Opposition. 
 
 ♦u /SVu "J''®,.'l*®,*r* English precedent I am able to produce. I will merely add 
 that It the iiUglish House of Commons, after full discussion, has declared that the 
 procedure for breach of privilege must, in the words of the Attomey-General of 
 England, be prompt and immediate," and if a delay of three years has just been 
 solemnly held to be a fatal delay, I submit tliat the Imperial Act of 1876, amend- 
 ing section 18 of the British North America Act, inhibits you ft-om exceeding that 
 limit. Mr. Rykert s alleged offence whether you call it a breach of privilegeTor of 
 the unwritten law of Parliament, occurred more than three years ago; was made 
 public through the newspapers; discussed and used against him at the noUs. but 
 has been entirely Ignored by the House of Commons, of which he was and is a 
 member for a ppriod of more than three years. The unanimous resolve of the 
 House ofCommons in the Parnell case on 12th February last, shows us that this 
 attack upon the member for Lincoln and Niagara has been too long postponed 
 
 • «