IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 tea 128 |2.5 
 |5o ■'^~ HlllMB 
 
 I ^ lll£ 
 
 1.8 
 
 
 \M |||J4 16 
 
 
 6" ■ 
 
 ► 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 
 
 (716)872-4503 
 

 do 
 
 L<9 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHIVI/ICIVIH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical IVIicroreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 <v 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 Couverture endommag^e 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaurie et/ou pelliculAe 
 
 I I Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 □ Coloured maps/ 
 Cartes giographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 
 n 
 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Relii avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La re liure serrde peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distorsion le long de la marge int^rieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte. 
 ma's, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 filmies. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl^mentaires: 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a it^ possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la methods normale de filmage 
 sont indiquAs ci-dessous. 
 
 Tl 
 to 
 
 I I Coloured pages/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagies 
 
 Pages restored and/oi 
 
 Pages restauries et/ou pelliculdes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxei 
 Pages d^color^es, tacheties ou piqudes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages ditachdes 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Quality inigale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materii 
 Comprend du materiel suppl^mentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 pn Pages damaged/ 
 
 I I Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 r~| Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 r~~| Pages detached/ 
 
 rj] Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 r~n Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 I I Only edition available/ 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont M filmdes A nouveau de facon d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 Tl 
 
 P< 
 o4 
 fil 
 
 O 
 
 b( 
 tfi 
 si 
 
 01 
 
 fil 
 si 
 oi 
 
 Tl 
 si 
 
 Tl 
 w 
 
 IV 
 d 
 
 ei 
 b 
 ri 
 rt 
 n 
 
 This Item Is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmi au taux de reduction indiquA ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 J 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 a4x 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thank* 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 Seminary of Quebec 
 Library 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grAce A la 
 gAnArositt de: 
 
 SAminaire de Quebec 
 Bibliothique 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Las images suivantes ont iti reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition at 
 de la nettetA de l'exemplaire film6. et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est ImprimAe sont filmis en commen9ant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 derniire page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration. soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont filmis en commen^ant par la 
 premlire page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la derniire page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol —»>( meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 derniire image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbole -*> signifie "A SUIVRE". le 
 symboie V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc.. may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 filmte A des taux de reduction diffirents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre 
 reproduit en un seul clich6. il est film6 A partir 
 de I'angle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche 6 droite, 
 et de haut en bas. en prenant le nombre 
 d'images ntcessaire. Les diagr«mmes suivants 
 illustrent la mithode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 2 3 
 
 4 8 6 
 
(J^o ci r ^io ' ^ 
 
 CASE 
 
 TO BE FOUND AT PAGE 36 OF THE SECOND VOLUME 
 
 OF THE 
 
 LOWER CANADA REPORTS, 
 
 OFFICIALLY REPORTED AND 
 
 
 
 THORITY. 
 
 
 " ''^^ 
 
 LANGLOIS vs. MARTEL. 
 
 \i 
 
 " There is no law in this country fixing a uniform rate of cens et rentes — 
 " the arr^s of 1711 and 1732, apply, the first only to cases where the Sei- 
 " gnior refuses to grant unconceded lands, and the last to the clearing of forest 
 " lands, the sale of which it prohibits, — a concession in which a portion of the 
 " rente is stipulated rente constituee rachetabley is not a sale." 
 
 iiUEBEO: *-..J»f^^.'' 
 PRINTED BY JOHN LOVELL, AT HIS STEAM PRINTING ESTABLISHMENT, 
 
 MOUNTAIN STREET. 
 
 "•'' '=•-■" 1652. 
 
 /• 
 
 
 4 
 
 J 
 

 w*' * "f " 
 
 -1. 
 
 
 «)« 
 
 
 
 Vi»%i«^^ 
 
 
 \.,-jir'^ , 
 
 "lki'*«s;.,Vi.' ■>;. 
 
 •J ■» T-* iT '' a r «, -**i ^j tr* *, ? f rt if 
 
v-W- 
 
 CASE FROM LOWER CANADA REPORTS. 
 
 PAGE 36. 
 
 SUPElUOIl COURT, QUEBEC. 
 
 Before Bowex, Chief Justice, Duv.vi- and Meredith, Justices. 
 
 ! 
 
 1591 ~) Langlois, 
 
 or V- 
 
 1852 ) Martel, 
 
 vs. 
 
 Plaintiff. 
 Defendant. 
 
 TL'ld Mmt the arrit of tlie King of Ti-anoo, of tho fith of July, 1711, can only be made to apply to case* 
 wlici'c the Soi;,"iiior has ii fused to grant liiti unctmecJed lands ; that the arret of the 17th March, 1732, merely 
 enjoins the elcaiiiig of foiestlauds, iuterdiotlug the sale of such lands ; but that these two arrets afford no 
 rcnu'dy to a Con^;itaile who oninplains that the latc of rcnlea is too high ; that there is no positive law limiting 
 the rate of cc/is tt re/i/t'.'i; thai a deed of concession imposinjj one sol of rem et rentes and seven so/« o{ rente 
 conxliliilc is not a dei'd of sale ; and is not consequently void or voidable ; and that in the case submitted, th« 
 Court has no power to reduce the rate of.«Hs et rentes. 
 
 TRANSLATION. 
 
 t ■ ' 
 
 Judgment i 3th January, 1858. 
 
 This was an action brought by a Seignior against his Censitaire to recover the 
 arrears of a constituted ground rent {ccns et rentes Joncieres et constituees,) due under 
 a deed of concession. 
 
 The plaintiffs declaration alleged " that by a deed executed before Panet, 
 Notary, on the 10th September, 1839, the Plaintiff, Seignior of part of Bourg Louis 
 or New Guernsey, did concede to the Defendant subject to the payment of cenSf 
 irredeemable ground rents and constituted rents, {d titre de cens, de rentes foncierea 
 non rachetables et rentes constituees,) a land" described in the said deed. 
 
 " That the said concession was made subject to the payment, for each arpent 
 in superficies of the laud so conceded, of one sol or half-penny currency, of 
 perpetual and irredeemable Seigniorial cens et rente, and seven sols or three pence 
 half-penny currency annual and constituted rent, at the rate of six per cent per 
 annum, redeemable at pleasure, forming in the whole eight sols or four pence cur- 
 rency o/ccns et rentes, fonciere et constituee /or each arpent in superficies. " 
 
 That the arrears amount to £10, and the Plaintiff prays that the Defendant be 
 condemned to pay the said sum. 
 
3 
 
 To this action the Defendant pleaded : 
 
 1. That the land described in the PlaintifTs declaration and in the deed of con- 
 oeMion mentioned, before and at the time of the passing of the said deed, consisted of 
 anconceded forest land, and formed part of the Seigniory of Bourg Louis, also called 
 New Guernsey, and of the domain thereof, having never been conceded nor charged 
 with Seigniorial rights and dues. 
 
 2. That by the law of the Country and the titles and grants of the said Seigniory 
 the Seignior thereof, and especially the Plaintiff, acting as Seignior of a portion 
 thereof, was bound to concede the lands of the said portion of the Seigniory, subject 
 to the payment of cena et rentes or Seigniorial dues, according to the legal 
 rate acknowledged in this Province, and according to the rate of cens et rentes recog- 
 nized at and before that time in the said Seigniory ; the said rate being one sol for 
 each arpent in superficies ; but that the Seignior or the Plaintiff were forbidden to 
 Bell the said lands for a price or sum of money. 
 
 3. Now the Defendant alleges that by the deed of concession in the PlaintifPs 
 declaration mentioned, he, the said Plaintiff, did sell the said land and establish a 
 price to be paid for the concession thereof, as follows : that the said concession is 
 made subject to the payment by the said Defendant to whom the land is conceded, to 
 the said Plaintiff, the Seignior conceding the same, of one sol or halfpenny currency 
 perpetual and irredeemable Seigniorial cens et rentes^ and seven sols or three pence 
 halfpenny currency^ annual and constituted rent at the rate of six per cent per annum^ 
 redeemable at pleasure^ for each arpent in superficies of the said land ; the said cena 
 d rentes carrying lods et ventes^ and heingpayable^ as well as the said constituted rents, 
 on the first of November in each year. 
 
 4. That consequently, so much of the said deed as stipulates a price of sale, or 
 the payment of seven sols annual and constituted rent, redeemable at pleasure, over 
 and above the ordinary cens et rentes, is null, illegal and of none effect, inasmuch as 
 by the laws of the country, and especially by the arrdts and ordinances of the sixth 
 of July, one thousand seven hundred and eleven, and of the lifteenth of March, one 
 thousand seven hundred and thirty-two, the Seignior is forbidden to sell the uncon- 
 ceded lands in his Seigniory, in any form or under any pretext whatsoever, on pain 
 of the said sale being null, and of reimbursing the Censitaire, the sums of money 
 so illegally demanded of him for such sale. 
 
 5. Wherefore, in consideration of the premises, the Defendant hath a right to 
 pray and doth pray, that so much of the said deed as stipulates a price for the sale of 
 the said land, namely : seven sols annual and constituted rent, redeemable at pleasure, 
 for each arpent in superficies, be declared null and of none effect, illegal and void, 
 and that by the judgment of this Court the PlaintifTs action be dismissed with costs. 
 
 6. And the Defendant doth further allege, as another perpetual peremptory 
 exception in law, in answer to the PlaintifTs demande, that the rate of cens and Seig- 
 nioral rents and dues at which the Plaintiff was bound to concede the said land, was 
 the old and ordinary rate at which lands were and have been formerly conceded in 
 the said Seigniory of Bourg Louis. 
 
 7. That the said rate was no more than one sol of Seigniorial cens et rentes for 
 
 oi 
 ni 
 ai 
 
each arpent in superficies, which rate is mentioned and fixed by the Plaintiflf himself 
 in the said deed of concession, at one sol cena et rente for each arpent in superficies, 
 as aforesaid, and which said rate the Defendant hath offered, hath always been, and 
 is still ready to pay, and hath in fact paid. 
 
 8, That consequently, a rate of cena et rente exceeding one 8ol per arpent in 
 superficies is illegal, and the excess over that rate ought to be reduced and deducted. 
 
 9. Wherefore the Defendant humbly prays that for the causes aforesaid, by the 
 judgment of this Honorable Court it be declared and adjudged : 1st. That so much 
 of the aforesaid deed of concession as stipulates a price of sale for the said land, 
 namely, seven sols constituted and annual rent, redeemable at pleasure, for each 
 arpent in superficies, be declared illegal, null and of none effect and void both for the 
 past and for the future ; 2ndly. That the rate of cens et rente shall remain as stipu- 
 lated in the said deed of concession, at one sol of cens et rentes for each arpent in 
 superficies, and be reduced to the said rate, or to such other rate as the law declaxes 
 legal, the Defendant reserving to himself the right of taking thereupon any other con- 
 clusions that he may deem necessary ; and that the action of the said Plaintiff be dis- 
 missed with costs. 
 
 Lelievre for Plaintiff: * 
 
 There is no law fixing the quota of cena et rentes ; the cena when payable in 
 money varies as much in amount, as in the mode of payment ; it is sometimes paid 
 in poultry, sometimes in grain, besides a moderate redevance in money; these ar- 
 ticles must necessarily vary in value ; if the law, therefore, did establish the quota 
 of cens et rentes it would not be lawful for the Seignior to impose them otherwise 
 than in a fixed sum of money. (1) 
 
 The value of money is much less at this day than what it was a century ago; 
 and the one sol of cens with the rente of two or three so/a, charged a hundred years 
 ago, was equivalent to the cens et rentes charged at this day, and claimed in this 
 cause. The stipulation of a redeemable constituted rent, is one which is favorable 
 to the Censilaire, who may be discharged therefrom, by re-imbursement, prescrip- 
 tion, or sale by authority of justice. (2) 
 
 The arrets of 1711 and 1732 contain no provision fixing the quota of cena: if 
 such be the case, the Defendant cannot complain that he has been left the power of 
 being discharged by redemption. 
 
 Tessier, for the Defendant : 
 
 The deed of concession contains two distinct parts ; one in the form of a con- 
 cession, which stipulates one sol of cens et rentes per ajpent in superficies ; the other, 
 in the form of a sale, which stipulates a redeemable constituted rent of seven sola 
 per arpent in superficies. In the case of a dicret., (sale by authority of justice,) the 
 
 (1) Poquet do Livonitire, p. 634 : — Die. de droit, vbo. cens, p. 249 : — Rtnauldon Dr. Seig. pp. 162, 167: 
 Prud'homme, pp. 87, 129. 
 
 (2) Denisart, 4 t. tIx>. renief fonciiret, no. 16, b. 246. 
 
Seignior inlglit claim \hc capital of tliifti coiistilulcd rent, luul by i1k> rcdoiuption iuh! 
 gradual extinction of thcao rents, tlit; riglil of (/nhil would he less, and the Crown, 
 as well as llic Ccnsitaire, is interested in prcventinij; tliv Seiynior from selling liis 
 forest lands. Besides the edict is positive, and declaies that these sales shall not bo 
 made, on pain of nullity, and even of the reimbursemcni of the price of sah-, if the 
 same shall have been |)aid. 
 
 As to the rate of cenn el rentes, the edicts of the Cth of July, 17 1 1, and of the 15tli 
 of March, 1732, declare that the lands shall be conceded at the ordinary rate now, 
 no examjjle can be found before 17C3, of any rate exceeding four .so/*' per arpent ; a 
 rate exceeding this one is not therefore an ordinary rate. 
 
 The Censitaircs have made constant eflbrts to maintain their rights before; the 
 Courts, and among the numerous precedents to be found (and which are hereafter 
 cited) there are a great many in which decisions have been given in favor of the 
 Censitaircs, under the French Government, and there arc none in w hich tiie Courts, 
 since the Cession of the Country, have decided these old ordinances not to \n^ in 
 force; it is true that the tribunals have often avoided deciding the qiiestionf upon 
 their real merits ; the present Courts have therefore nothing left but the duly of enriy- 
 ing these ordinances into execution in the interest of the Censitaircs and of the 
 Seigniors. 
 
 The Report of the Commissioners on the Seigniorial Tenure, of 1813, declares 
 these edicts to be in force, and that the powers of the Inlendant are transferred to our 
 present Courts. (1) 
 
 BowEN, Chief Justice : 
 
 This important case has been pleaded with great care on both sidi^s, and yet 
 the questions which it presents are not new. The action was brought for ilie recovery 
 of a sum of £1G currency, arrears oi cens et rentes due to the Plniiitiiri)y the Defend- 
 ant, under a deed of concession. 
 
 To this action the Defendant pleaded the provisions of the arret of the 6th .Inly, 
 1711, contained in the 1st vol. oi llm Edits et Orel.]). 3il (2) and the provisions 
 of the or/'e/ of the 25th March, 1733 also contained in the 1st vol. ot Xhc Edits et 
 Ord. p. 486. (3) 
 
 (I) Aq\. 17, Gcurgo III: Act 3-t George III : — Repovt: of tlic Ci)ni)iiissinnoi's on tlio Sei^norial Teiiuro, 
 1843: — Cugmt, Tntilc dc^ Fiefs, p. CO : — 1 Iknrion ile Pinunj. DUscriation' Feuiltiles. pp. 'J75 mid 270: — 
 Ancien Bcnlsarl, vbo. cens: — .'7c/e/ of tlio '20tli May, 1713: 2 Kilils cl Oriloii nances, p. 3!t : — .Inels of the 
 15th Februury 1710, of the 2.Stli Juno, 1721, of tlio 20th September, 1721, of tho 10th OctoluT, 1721, of the 
 21st February, 1731, of the 20tli July, 173:;, of tho 2ar(l .Jiiiiimry, 1738, and of tlie 23i'd February, 1748. On 
 tho question wliethor a portion of a deed eau lie declared null without iloclariiig tlio wliolo deed to 1)C null : — 
 Perrin, Traile des nulliies... .: — Cuyol, licpcrluire dejuihjirudciice, vbo. nullitcs: Ferriirc, JJicliuunuiic dc 
 droit vbo. nuUUis. 
 
 Arr^tof the Gill July, nu. 
 
 (2) Tho King licing informed th.it, among tl)e tiaets of liind-«lii(hl!i.- Mnjesty lirr- been pleaded to grant and 
 concede in Seigniory to his subjects in New France, there are some wliieli have not been entirely settled, and 
 others on wlueh there are us yet uo sellleiB to bring tlicui into a state I'f eultiv;itiuii, and mi wlii.'li iil.-ii) those 
 to whom they have tx'on conceded in Seigniory have not yet commenced to make clearings for the purpose of 
 establisliing their domain thercou. 
 
 Aud liis Majesty being also informed that there are some Se iguiore who refuse, under various pretexts, 
 
Iiiaiid 
 r<;wn, 
 
 |ii>t 1)(' 
 the 
 
 ; ISth 
 now, 
 |nt ; a 
 
 Till* object of lliOM> cri'e.'n was to ()l)lig(» tlic Seigniors to coiu'cdc llii> hauls in 
 ll;('iv Hcigiiiori''s, and lo [)H'vciit tlioui from celling their ibicsl htiids. The Dfftuidanl 
 
 t.> conopile Iniidri (■• •■<.'ttliT.< who npply to tlnni, v illi ll.< Imni ol' luini,' iil/l( ti m II ihc .-.iinic, iimi iil flif huiho 
 limi' iinpi "o 11)1. 11 (lie puriliii: > t> tlic >: ir..' diK s ii< iiic piii I 'ly tli' inliiiliitj;ii! ■ ;i!' nily m Itli d ( ii IhikI, , v, lilcli 
 is oiitii'tily cuiitiiiiy l<> llii* ^Iiijinty's iiiti'iiluns. iiii'l to tlir cIiiii.-ih iiiui comliliciiiH nl' Miu ui'ii'-isyioui, 
 tjy wlilrli tlry lu'c iiuiily |)ci'iiiilli'd tw cdhociIc iniidrt at iiii iiii:iiiiil inDiind irtil ; wlnrrliy veiy jjrciit 
 di'tiiiiifiit, is d''iii; Id tilt! iU'VV sctllcr^^ whu f'lliii 1« ■•■t l;;iiil hjm ii tn nUlcliniit in 11k |.Iii«r.* In-t ad:i['tu(l to 
 cninriit'i'i'c. 
 
 \ 
 
 \ 
 
 !;■(> !^i t; ll■l^ 1I-- lul-- < 1 I^iUmI \,l\' li llii y luiy di luMidot till 111 111 1 1,. 11- .Sri;,'liliilli-, III II IJi'i i.lid iclil, mill williout 
 
 • xnctiii!,' IVi in tln'iii iiiiy tmm ot iu"ii<'y ii»< a ('oiisidi'i-i.tii.ii I'nr fiii'Iuviikv^miii.h ;(itlirr\vi-'i', mid In ilt!':iidt oi'ilitMr 
 Hd diiiii',', lli> M:i,)i-ly I'criiiiia till' .-uiJ hcII \vyn tudi iii:;iidllu' miIiI int.s nf liiiiil IVoiii tin 111 liy a t'liu.al suiiinioiis, 
 M'.d in ni.-r of tin ii- ii't'i:,-:il. t • iii:il;i> lU'j 'Iiatiitii Id tlic (iov.'niiir and IJouti iiiiiit. (li'ii.i id and Iiihudiiiit of llio 
 Hiiid (.'(lUiltiy, win 111 His S!iij»'»ly onjcuic to ruiiri'do In the Si'tlUis llu^ line's diiniin Ird liy llniii, in the said 
 Svi;;iiioii<^, T'lr ll.'' fiaim: dius as au' lai'l ii]hiii IIk- ithri- cuiiiM'cl.d laii'i.- In tin ■•niil S. iu,i:i.irir.s, wliicii duvs 
 plliiM lie J'liid li_V t'ur IH'W -cttlt'i'.- ilit') tlif luiinU of tlu' Iliiiivcii.l' lli:^ Maji-ly's d piiifiiii. ill tin' <ity of (^lu'liLC, 
 witlimit it.< iK'iiif? in tlio jiowci- <if tlic fSriijiiims to cliiiiu from tlicin any duos of any Kind \^]mt»•v^l•. 
 
 And ll.i-i ilr.'itr ^llall 111' ic;:i'tiriil in tlic iryli-ti-y of tlio Siijii'iior Cuuni il ol'iiiadioi.-. Mid ic.d and jiuti- 
 lished wherever nerd shall be. 
 
 DoiKi in til'.' Ki.i'/d Couiuil of etaie held at Maily, IliaMajoty btiii;^ jiix'siut, tlir 0th day of July, 1711. 
 
 (Signed,) I'lIKLiri'KAUX. 
 
 Arret of 1732. 
 
 (Ii) The luiij; liavini; can-i d tin pf. ihietlonheforc.liini, in Ills C ^iiiifil, of iln decree uinh vc 1 thciein the fith 
 Jiilv, 1711. ordciiiii,' that llie iiiLaKitiints of New I'laneo, to ■whom laiiilB oi- li.fs have Ikiii jfianted, inid 
 who have ii.'t y<t cl< .-iic I iniy i"irtioii thcii'of as a doii;aiii, imr caii.ed the inlialiitiinl-. to si tile tluieiii, should 
 be held (.1 puttlieiu in a .-t.'ite of cultivali.ili. and to place ^-t ttlcrn thereon, within a yeaf fioiii the publicatlou 
 of the said dcTee, after tlie oxpiiiition of which iKIay. siich Hif^ should be re-united to the doniaiii of Ilia 
 ihijcsty ; and that the said !Sci;iiioi--i .-lioiildals'i he licl.l |.. e.iiic'.ile to ihc iiihabitaol., (Ii'iiiaiiiliic,' tlniii, siiliject 
 to the usual sciifiiiorial dues {I'l tlly il'' ri'(krniirfs), and witlmnt exacting' any sum of money, in default whereof 
 the said iiihiiliitant-', in case of a refusal on the jmrt of the ,Sei(,'niui's, after demand to that etl'ect, uic 
 i)eniiiUed to apply to the C.ivenior and Liciilciiant (iincial and Intendant of the said Ci.untry, to obtain 
 eoncig-ions of -udi lands, sub;e" t to the dues imposed ui)oii the lands already eoneedcd, whicli dm - should bo 
 paid to the Uc'ceiver of the domain of His Majesty, without the hfi ijiniois Lciin; allowed to elaiin any thing 
 upon the lauds S" eoiioided : and another <li.c;-ee of tli.- raiiiediiy, lilli July, 1111, ordeiiiy that tlie tenants of 
 lands ni roture should be held to reside thereon, Uti'r feu et lieu, and to put them inn state of cultivatiouwitbiu 
 u year from the day of pnblieation, on pain of ro-uniou to the domain of the Seigniors, by virtue <if the Ordin- 
 ances of the Jiilcii(lant. 
 
 And m.i Majesty Ijcint,' informed that, iu ooutravention to those two decrees, there nre Seiifniors who have 
 reserved for iLeinselves, iu their .Seigniories, extensive domains, which they sell as wood hinds, instead of eou- 
 eediii" them merely subject to the usual Seignloiial dues {a litre i/c r't/fc«)i<'p.«,) and that inhabitants who have 
 obtained eonccssioii of lauds from the Seigniors, sell such lands to others who do as much, whidi gives rise to 
 u system of liartering contrary to the welfare of the Colony, and it being noeessary to jmt a stoji to abuses so 
 prejudicial. His Majesty, sitting in Council, has ordained, and doth ordain, that, within two years from the day 
 of publication of the present decree, all jiroprictors of Seigniories not yet in a state of eultivalion, shall lie 
 held to imt them in a state iJ" eultivati.di, and to h cati> inhabitants therein; in default whereof, and after Iho 
 exiiiriition of such delay, tln' s:iid Seigniories slii'U bi- rc-unitcd to the domain of His Majest j , by virtue of the 
 present decree, and without any other proceeding being required. 
 
 His Majesiy expressly prohibiting all Seigniors, or other proprietors, from selling auy woodland, on pain 
 of nullity oi' the deed of sale, and of restitution of the price of lands sold as aforesaiil, which la!;<ls shall, in 
 the same manner, be re-uuited by force of law to the domain of His Jlajesty; and furtheiinoro. the said two 
 deereei of the 10th July, 1711, shall be executed according to their tenor and ell'ect, and the present deeieo 
 elia'l be registered in tlie llegistry Oflice of the Supeiior Council of Quebec, and shall be read and published 
 wherever it will bo necessary. 
 
 Done iulLu Kiug'ii Couucil, iu preioaoc of IILs iluje.^ity, at A'crsailles, the loth JTiirch, 173:;. 
 
 (Signed), I'UELIlTiiAUX. 
 
 ('■ 
 
is not within tlic cases provided by tlieso arrets^ nnd yet ho wants to have his deed 
 in part annulled, iind in pari nmintaincd. The arret of 1711 it* in the nature of a 
 penal Statute;, ntid must be intcrpnMed according to the letter. I am of opinion that 
 tlie Defendant docs%ii6t come at all wilhiu ilio case provided. There has been no 
 calling upon the 8oigfrior to (ioiicedc, norrcfufial on his part to do so : on the contrary, 
 llie Agfecmciii entered into between the parties has been entirely free and voluntary. 
 The Dei«Utlant has not even made the necessary allegations in his pleas, in order 
 to succeed, nanK'ly, the fact of u concession having been demanded, and the refusal 
 on the part of the Seignior to make such concession. 
 
 I have said that the queslion was not a new one ; in support of this assertion, I 
 will cite a decision applicable to this case, rendered in the Court of Queen's Bench, 
 at Quebec, in 1820, No. 92, Dubois vs. Caldwell. It was an action in factum 
 brought by a Censitairo against his Seignior. The declaration alleged in substance, 
 that the Defendant had had 1000 livres paid him for the concession of a land in the 
 Seigniory of Gaspe, at a fixed rate of interest, over and above the cena ; and prayed 
 that the land in question be discharged from this aimual redevancCy imposed in 
 addition to the cens, and that the PlaintifT be exempted from the payment of this 
 capital of 1000 livres. To this action the Defendant answered by a defense en droit. — 
 Per Curiam : — This action (Dubois vs. Caldwell,) is founded on one of the clauses 
 of the arr^t of the 6lh July, 1711, which enacts : " That all the Seigniors in the said 
 " Country of New France, shall concede to the settlers, the lots of land which they 
 " may demand of them in their Seigniories, at a ground rent, and without exacting 
 " from them any sum of money as a consideration for such concessions ; otherwise, 
 " and in default of their so doing, His Majesty permits the said settlers to demand 
 " the said lots of land from them by a formal summons, and in case of their refusal, 
 " to make application to the Governor and Lieutenant General and Intendant of the 
 " Country, whom Ilis Majesty enjoins to concede to the said settlers the lands 
 " demanded by them, in the said Seigniories, for the same dues as are laid upon the 
 " other conceded lands in the said Seigniories, which dues shall be paid by the new 
 " settlers into the hands of the Receiver of His Majesty's Domain." This law must 
 be assimilated to a penal Statute, so that in order that the Plaintiff should succeed, 
 his case must come within the very letter of the law. The arret requires, in the first 
 place, that the Seignior shall be called upon to concede at the rate usual in his 
 Seigniory, and for no other consideration, and the recourse which it grants can only 
 be had in case of refusal. As the declaration neither alleges such calling upon the 
 Seignior to concede, nor his refusal to do so, it is defective in one essential point, 
 and the defense en droit must be maintained. 
 
 Such is the decision rendered as far back as 1820 on the subject, and the same 
 defects as were in Dubois' declaration are also to be found in Martel's exception. 
 
 It may be asked with reason (and this question arose in the cause above men- 
 tioned,) whether the Court has jurisdiction in this case, inasmuch as the authority 
 conferred by the arrdt of the Cth July, 1711, is not within the ordinary province 
 of the judicial power ? In eifect, it was the authority to make a concession of lands, 
 in the place of the Seignior, and this authority was vested in the Governor and in 
 the Intendant. The first was a purely political functionary j the second was invested 
 
J9 deed 
 (re of a 
 
 )ii that 
 l<'eii no 
 [ntrary, 
 
 order 
 |rori]t<al 
 
 with administratlvo and judiciary authority. Vide also ; " Ferlav et D^guise, in 
 Appeal, 5lh January, 1789, befi re Chief Jufitieo Smith." It mifjfht mIho he ankcd, 
 whctlier the Censitriire, in having agreed to the concession deejl and lalwcii possession 
 of the land, liad not renounced the benefit of the air^t, according to the rule; unU 
 cuitjne licet juri pro ae introducto renuntiari. 
 
 It is therefore evident that we cannot apply the am-t8 of 1711 and 1732 to the 
 present case, and that judgment nuist be rendered in favor of the Plaintiff. 
 
 Duval, Justice. 
 
 This cause is one of great importance, both for the Seignior and for the Ccnsi- 
 airc ; but the f|nesiion, in the way in which it is brought, does not present much 
 difficulty. The Defendant pleads that he is only bound to pay one sol of cens, and 
 that as to the sum or annual redevance of seven aols, imposed upon him in the form 
 of a constituted rent, he ought to bo discharged therefrom, and he prays that part of 
 the deed of concession, to wit : so much thertwf us imposes a due of seven aols^ be 
 annulled. What does he found this pretension upon ? It cannot assuredly be upon 
 .the arrets of 1711 and 1732 ; both these arrets, the only ones that can be cited, only 
 apply to the refusal of the Seignior to concede, and to the sale of forest lands, in both 
 of which cases, the matter had to be brought before the Intendant. No reference 
 whatever is made therein to the rate of the concessions. ( Vide these airdts above 
 cited.) If they ire still law, the Court cannot apply them in part ; they must have 
 their full cflbcl, and render the concession entirely null. Besides, these arre'ta con- 
 ferred upc/n the Governor and the Intendant, administrative and extra judiciary 
 powers which do not belong to this Court. 
 
 These arreta in no wise justify the exception pleaded in this case. The Defen- 
 dant might have pleaded an error in Law, and alleged that he had signed that deed 
 without due cause or motive, but he has not thought proper to do so, and can- 
 not therefore avail himself of that ground of defence (1.) He should have made it 
 the subject of a special plea, and the Defendant might then have answered and proved, 
 in consequence of the uncertainty, or of the ambiguity of the Law, that the parties 
 had entered into a transaction among themselves; and this answer would have been 
 conclusive. It has been pretended that this deed was a sale, but such is not the 
 case ; in my opinion it is purely a deed of Concession. 
 
 Meredith, Justice. ' 
 
 J 
 
 It would be almost useless for me to add any thing to the observations of the 
 other Members of the Court on this important case, but I think it my duty to quote 
 the very words of the arr^i of 1732, which are supposed to apply to the present case. 
 They are as follows : 
 
 (1.) Revue de Woloski, 18 vol. p. 169 :— 6 Toullier, Nob. 58 to 71 :--l Potliier, ob. 17 :™2 Evans Potliier, 
 369 : — La Revue, loco citato. 
 
 <1 
 
t 
 
 ' I 
 
 " Ilis Majesty expressly prohibits all Soigninvsor other proprietors, from selling 
 "any wood lands, on pnin of nullity of tlie deed of sale and of restitution of the 
 *' priee of lands sold as aforesaid, which lands shall in the same. manner be re-united 
 "by force of law to the Domain of His jVIajesty." 
 
 The Defendant, in order to come within the ease provided by the mT^t of 1732, 
 has alleged in his plea "That the land described in tlu; Plaintill's declaration, be- 
 " fore and at the time of the execution of the said Deed of Concession, consisted of 
 "niiconceded woodbind &;c." If the Defendant liad proved this allegation, we 
 should have been called upon to decide a number of important (jnestions, which, in 
 the absence of such proof do not arise. ■ 
 
 Caro.v, Counsel for Defendant. 
 
 I must call attention to the fact, that the Deed of Concession granted by the 
 Plaiutiltto the Defendant, contains a clause imposing the condition that the Ceusi- 
 taire shall dear and improve the said land. 
 
 Merkdith, Justice, 
 
 I do not think tlial, ac(;oriling to this siipuluiion, it must necessarily be inferred 
 that no pari, of that land had been improved, ^md tliat it consisted of woodland 
 within the meaning of the arret of 1733. 
 
 Duval, Justice. 
 
 It is not a Deed of Sale, and besides there is no proof that it is wood land. 
 
 Meredith, Justice, in continuation : — 
 
 The arrets of 1711 and 1732 were introductory of new Law into the system of 
 French law introduced into the Colony, a system by which a Seignior could concede 
 his land at a rate agreed upon between himself and t!ie Censitaire (1). These arrets 
 are penal laws. In order to subject any one to tlie penalties imposed by these arrets ; 
 the infraction complained of must be a violation of the letter andof the spirit of the law, 
 (2) and the Court cannot be satisfied with a presumjjtion as to an essential fact 
 which it was easy to prove. In the present case, six witnesses examined by the 
 Defendant, slate that lliey know the laud in question, none of them state thfit it was 
 wood land at the lime it was conceded. I consider the proof of the Defendant 
 on this point to be defective, but as tliere may be a variety of opinions in this respect, 
 I do not hesitate to sfiy (and I have examined this (|uestion also) that I concur in the 
 opinion of the oilier INIcmbers of the Court, naniely, that the deed in question is not a 
 deed of sale within the meaning of the arr(jt of 1732. 
 
 It is possil)le, (lluough I know no example of a D(^ed of Concession having been 
 annulled) it is possible, I repeat, that if a case of this nature had been submitted to 
 the (lovornor, or to the Inlendanl, under the French Covernment, the Censitaire 
 
 
 (1) Ilerve, 5 v. p, ill lo [ti-.—Dunod, part 111 c. X. !>. 311 :— 1 Jr.^ou p. 519. 
 (-') nv.arris, p. T.'JT :— 3 BiuijlKini p. 583. 
 
9 
 
 might have succeeded. But these officers exercised very different powers from thoee 
 vested in us, and a very great latitude was allowed them in the interpretation and 
 execution of the Laws, which is not allowed us. It would seem that it was suf- 
 ficient for these officers to know the intention oi the Sovereign, in order to impose a 
 duty or an obligation, without its being necessary ihat such intention should be ex-' 
 pressed in a law ; while in a case like this, with the powers which we exercise, 
 we must confine ourselves to the letter of the law. 
 
 In order to show what the extraordinary powers were, that the authorities under 
 the French Government exercised from time to time, in respect to the Concession of 
 lands, I refer to a judgment of the 20th July, 1733. (1) " which on the petition of 
 " the Seigniors of Portneuf, condemns the Censitaires of the said Seigniory to 
 " furnish them copies of their deeds, and those who have not taken them, to 
 " procure the same on the same conditions as the former ones, unless they would 
 " rather submit to the rent of thirty sola and one capon for each arpent in front by 
 " thirty arpents in depth, of six deniera of cena and the eleventh fish, which choice 
 " they will be bound to make, or leave the choice to the Seignior, &c. 
 
 I refer also to an enactment of the 4th October, 1743, passed by virtue of orders 
 from the King, requiring the Seigniors of the Mingan Island, to concede certain 
 Islands, on the condition of the payment of a redevance of three per cent upon the Seal 
 Skins and Seal Oil prepared by the Censitaires. (2.) 
 
 I refer, moreover, to an Ordinance of the 27th May, 1758, which subjects all 
 lands within the domain of the Crown, in the city of Quebec, to an annual payment 
 of five sola six deniera per arpent, and those of the banlieue to one denier per 
 arpent. (3.) 
 
 With respect to the Arr^t of 1711, the obligations which it imposes upon the 
 Seigniors, as regards the concession of lands are in the following terms : 
 
 " And His Majesty ordains also, that all the Seigniors in the said Country of 
 " New France, shall concede to the settlers the lots of land which they may demand 
 " of them in their Seigniories, at a ground rent, and without exacting from them any 
 " sum of money as a consideration for such concessions." 
 
 This arr^t does not define the rate at which the Seigniors were to concede their 
 lands to the Censitaires, but it is evident, from the provisions therein contained, 
 with respect to the rate at which the Governor, Lieutenant General and Intendant were 
 bound to concede, and it appears from divers arr^ta and regulations, that the intention 
 of the Kings of France was to oblige the Seigniors to concede their lands at the or-- 
 dinary rates, and that these rates were less than those charged at the present day. 
 Many persons believed, formerly, that there must have been a law in existence in 
 the colony, regulating the rate of concessions, and determining the maximum thereof^ 
 It is nevertheless universally admitted, I believe, that this supposition had no founda- 
 tion. The Courts of Justice then, in this Colony, in the presence of a law obliging 
 the Seignior to concede and in the absence of any law fixing the rate of concessions,, 
 
 (1) 2 Edits et Ordomuuce, p. LXXI of Table. 
 
 (2) 2 EditB et Ordonnance, p. LXXXII of Table. 
 
 (3) 2 Edits et Ordonmtace, p. 121, 
 
 P 
 
10 
 
 or forbidding the Censitaires to pay any such redevances whatsoever agreed upon 
 between them and the Seigniors, have always, since the conquest, so far as I have 
 been enabled to ascertain, determined that a voluntary convention agreed to between 
 the Seignior and the Censitaire, regulating the price of the redevance, cannot be an- 
 nulled on the grounds that the said redevance is higher than those imposed in 1711 
 and 1732, or than those formerly imposed in the Seigniory in which the Censitaire 
 asking for the reduction of his concession, is settled. This doctrine has been applied 
 in several causes in which I was myself employed as an Advocate. In 1840, I 
 brought several actions in the Court of Queen's Bench at Montreal, at the suit of the 
 representatives of the late Gen. N. C. Burton, against censitaires in the Seigniories 
 of Bleury, DeL6ry, Lacolle and Noyan for arrears of cens et rentes the rate whereof 
 was higher than in the present case. These Censitaires and some other persons, 
 interested in the question, joined together in contesting the legality of those demands, 
 and for that purpose secured the professional services of the first lawyers of the . 
 Montreal Bar. Four of these cases (Hamilton vs. Fortin ; the same vs. Chouinard ; 
 the same vs. Lamoureux ; the same vs. Brouillette ; ) were brought to judgment- 
 The sole question submitted to the Court was this : " Can the reduction of the cens 
 *' et rentes stipulated in a deed of concession be demanded ? " This proposition was 
 supported in the affirmative with great ability but without success. The judgment 
 in one of these cases, and the reasons on which it is founded, are detailed at length 
 in the Report of the Commissioners on the Seigniorial Tenure. 
 
 The question of appealing these cases was mooted, but that idea was aban- 
 doned ; and similar judgments were rendered in all the other cases. At that period, 
 the researches which I was obliged to make had convinced me that those judgments 
 were correct, and now, after a new examination of the question, I can find no reason 
 to set aside the doctrine which those decisions has laid down. I concur, therefore, 
 In the judgment, which is in support of the Plaintiff's action. 
 
 The judgment is as follows : — 
 
 The Court, considering that the arr^t of the King of France, dated the 6lh of 
 July, 1711, cited by the Defendant in support of his plea, only applies lo the cac-e 
 in which the Seignior has refused to concede to the inhabitants the lands which they 
 require of him, and that the arr^t of the King of France, dated the 15th of March, 
 1732, also cited by the Defendant in support of his defence, orders all proprielors of 
 lands in Seigniories, yet uncleared, to put ihcm in a state of cultivation and place 
 settlers thereon, and that, by the said arret, His Majesty expressly Jirohibits all 
 Seigniors, or other proprietors, from selling any wood land, on pain of nullity of the 
 deed of sale, and of restitution of the price of lands sold as aforesaid, which lands 
 shall be re-united by force of law to the domain of His Majesty ; considering that it 
 is established that the Plaintiff in this cause. Seignior of the north-east half of the 
 Seigniory of Bourg Louis, now called New Guernsey, did, in and by a deed made 
 and executed before Mtre. Panet and his colleague. Notaries, at New Guernsey, on 
 the 17th September, in the year 1839, concede, but not sell, to the Defendant, the 
 land therein described, subject to the several charges, clauses and dues therein men- 
 tioned, which concession of the said land, and the said land, he hath held since the 
 passing of the said deed until this day ; considering that the allegations contained in 
 
 m 
 
11 
 
 the peremptory exception in law, which are established by the; proof adduced in this 
 cause, are not sufficient in law to annul the said deed of concession, in whole or iti 
 part, doth dismiss the perpetual peremptory exception in law in this cause filed by 
 the Defendant, and condemn the said Defendant to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of 
 thirteen pounds four shillings and eight pence, being the balance of the sum of 
 £16 lis. 4d., currency, for eight years' arrears of cerw et rentes due by the Defendant 
 to the Plaintiff by virtue of the aforesaid deed of concession, due the 1st November, 
 1848, with interest from the 28th April, 1849, and costs. 
 
 LKLitvRx and Axoehs, Attorneys for Plaintiff. 
 A. Stuart, Counsel. 
 
 Tessier, Attorney for Defendant. 
 Carov, Counsel. 
 
'»*"5 •, I 
 
 
 ',h . 
 
 
 #. 
 
M 
 
 CASE 
 
 TO BE FOUND AT PAGE 36 OF THE SECOND VOLUME 
 
 or THE 
 
 LOWER CANADA REPORTS, 
 
 OFFIOIALLT REPORTED AND PUBLISHBD BT AUTHORITT. 
 
 LANGLOIS vs. MARTEL. 
 
 *' There is no law in this country fixing a uniform rate of cens et rentes—' 
 ** the arrSts of 1711 and 1732, apply, the first only to cases where the Sei- 
 ** gnior refuses to grant unconceded lands, and the last to the clearing of forest 
 " lands, the sale of which it prohibits,--^ concession in which a portion of the 
 " rente is stipulated rente constitute rachetable, is not a sale." 
 
 IS 
 
 QUEBEC: 
 PBtMIBD BT JOHN LOVEUi, AT HIS STEAM PBlNTINa EBTABUSHMENT^ 
 
 MOUNTAIN STBEEI. 
 
 1862. 
 
 ..*