IMAGE EVALUATION
TEST TARGET (MT-S)
4
W'
^
m.
o
4LP M' -
fe
1.0 !f:«-
I.I
1.25
50
1^
M
2.0
1.8
U IIIIII.6
pjiotooranhic
Sci&es
Corporation
23 WEST MAIN STREET
WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580
(716) 873-4503
CIHM/ICMH
Microfiche
Series.
CIHM/ICMH
Collection de
microfiches.
Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques
'^
Technical and Bibliogmphic Notes/Notes techniques et bibticgraphiques
The
to th
The Institute has attempted to obtain the best
original copy available for filming. Features of this
copy which may be bibiiographically unique,
which may alter any of the images in the
reproduction, or which may significantly change
the usual method of filming, are checked below.
□ Coloured covers/
Couverture de couleur
I I Covers damaged/
D
Couverture endommag^e
Covers restored and/or laminated/
CoL'verture restaurie et/ou pelliculde
I I Cover title missing/
Le titre de couverture manque
□ Coloured maps/
Cartes giographiques en couleur
D
Coloured ink (i.e. other than bluo or black)/
Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire)
I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/
D
D
Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur
Bound with other material/
Reli6 avec d'autres documents
Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion
along interior margin/
Laraliure serr6e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la
distortion !e long de la m<9rge int^rieure
Blank leaves added during restoration may
appear within the text. Whenever possible, these
have been omitted from filming/
II se peut que certaines pages blanches aiout^es
lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans ie texte,
mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont
pas 6t6 filmdes.
Additional comments:/
Commentaires suppldmentaires;
L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilbur exemplaire
qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details
de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du
point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier
une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une
modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage
sont indiquds ci-dessous.
I I Coloured pages/
Pages de couleur
Pages damaged/
Pages endommag6es
□ Pages restored and/or laminated/
Pages restaurdes et/ou pelliculdes
r~KPages discoloured, stained or foxed/
[}Lj Pages d^color^es, tachet^es ou piquees
□ Pages detached/
Pages ddtach^es
r~7f Showthrough/
I — J Transparence
□ Quality of print varies/
Quality indgale de I'impression
□ Includes supplementary material/
Comprend du materiel supplementaire
□ Only edition available/
Seule Edition disponible
The
poss
of th
filmi
Orig
begi
the I
sion,
othe
first
sion,
or ill
D
Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata
slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to
ensure the best possible image/
Les pages totalement ou partiellement
obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure,
etc., ont 6t6 film^es d nouveau de facon d
obtenir la meilleure image possible.
The
shall
TINl
whic
Map
diffe
entir
begi
right
requ
metl
This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/
Ce docrment est film^ au taux de reduction indiqui ci-dessous.
10X 14X 18X 22X
26X
30X
n/^
12X
16X
20X
24X
J
28X
32X
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks
to the generosity of:
Metropolitan Toronto Library
Canadian History Department
L'exemplaire filmi fut reproduit grdce A la
gAn6rosit6 de:
Metropolitan Toronto Library
Canadian History Department
The images appearing here are the best quality
possible considering the condition and legibility
of the original copy and in keeping with the
filming contract specifications.
Les images suivantes ont iti reproduites avec le
plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et
de la nettet6 de l'exemplaire filmi, et en
conformity avec les conditions du contrat de
filmage.
Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed
beginning with the front cover and ending on
the Isst page with a printed or illustrated impres-
sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All
other original cofr 'es are filmed beginning on the
first page with a printed or illustrated impres-
sion, and ending ort the last page with a printed
or illustrated impression.
Les exempiaires originaux dont la couverture en
papier est imprimde sont filmds en commenpant
par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la
dernlAre page qui comporte une empreinte
d'impression ou d'iiiustration, soit p&r le second
plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exempiaires
originaux sont film6s en commenpant par la
premiere page qui comporte une empreinte
d'impression ou d'iiiustration et en terminant par
la dernidre page qui comporte une telle
empreinte.
The last recorded frame on each microfiche
shall contain the symbol -^ (meaning "CON-
TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning "END"},
whichever applies.
Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la
dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le
cas: le symbcle — ♦- signifie "A SUIVRE", le
symbole V signifie "FIN".
Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at
different reduction ratios. Those too large to be
entirely included in one exposure are filmed
beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to
right and top to bottom, as many frames as
required. The following diagrams illustrate the
method:
Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre
fiimds i des taux de reduction diff^rents.
Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre
reproduit en un seul cliche, il est f\\m6 A partir
de I'angle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche d droite,
et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre
d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants
illustrent la mdthode.
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
S
6
■s/
' ...
Li
s/
A REVIEW
n
or THE
AWFUL DISCLOSURES
MARIA MONK.
IN WHICH THE PACTS ARE r.MRI.Y STATED, AND CANDIDLY
EXAMINED.
BY G. VALE,
No, 84 Rosevelt Street, New-York.
1836.
V%'
«^<»i\C\"\
6^//0
E;<TERF.n, according to the Act of Congress, in the year 183G,
by G. Vale, in the Clerk's office of the District of the Southern
District of New- York,
KA.'20 B35
A REVIEW
OF THE
DXSCLOSURXSS
or
WpfpaTtoo from The book, that Maria Monk related the sub-
.Y,n foTthe consents of the book to Mr Tappin in the Alms
« .ep. La that Sernati confirms this statement to us. We
House, antljnat f ""^ijy..,,; ^^ ^ ,t ^ t^ok Maria from out
^'It'X House recevT her tes/imony and took her to
n n/,l« Zd reDresented her case to the British authorities
Se that ?hese obtained a manuscript copy of her statemerjt,
there, that inese ouia ^ suppose to the head of the
P 1 nfaTDeTartmen ^ti Son, and then wait for instructions :
?rnr tha? amrter wa do not however expect any action, as
i^Z will S in thrBritish Government. Mr Hoyt,it appears
Tn Ss"'tuf rpJepa^ to publish this account from a seco^
copy which he had preserved and applied to ^f ^^Vj^J^^
L'Seir:. ffilen'Sfn ° tnllhi^e be.ie.e to be the
I
I I
I'.
i
.JSi'.*'^ ..i'iS*
r-*'^'t'
Jj^aH^a;"
I ►
history of the book published by Howe & Bates, in which how-
ever, the nani'^ oi' IJoyt is not luentioiicd. The copy right it
npi)cais is securcil by «ne P. Gordon, and as far off as the Dis-
trict court uf Massachusetts; and beiii;; tlms secured l^y a person
not well known in New York, and in arutther state, wiii!e the
publishers where in this city, at first awaked our suspicion that
aU was not right: and we seriously doubled, if any such person
existed as Maria Monk, or the persons to whom she refers in
her book. From the Catholic Bishop of New York we first
learned that there were such convents as those named by Maria,
and that there was such a Bishop, and that such priests did
exist as she names in connexion with the convent ; thus confirm-
ing the ground work of Maria's story. Wo then visited the
chaplain of the AlrHs House, and from him obtained the fiict
that the contents of the book accorded with what she had told
him. Be also related, or rather we extracted from him the facts
we have j^iven in relation to Mr Hoiyt, Dr. Brownlee and the
Rev. Mr. Bourn ; the ohjcct of the latter gentlemen was to se-
cure an interest to Maria Monk in the work; while he speaks
also respectfully of Mr Hoyt, as deserving a remuneration for
the expense and trouble he has been at in making public this
affair. With the subject of the property we have nothing to do,
nor do we know that our readers have : but we have to do with
the contents of the book ; and so has every person in the com-
munity.
This book then, contains the following facts : That there arc
three convents in adjacent buildings in Montreal, and a semi-
nary very near the convents; these convents are the Congrega-
tional,the Black, and the Grey Nunneries ; the first devoted to
the education of girls ; the second to the caie of the sick, dis-
tributing bread and medicines ; and the last for the benefit of
the insane. The inmates are novices and nuns; the former
may at any time leave the convent, and are only admitted to a
{)art of the building ; the nuns of the Black Nunnery never
eave the building, but are admitted to all the rooms in the nun-
nery, and take oaths when they take the veil, which bind
them to obedience to thejpriests ; those of the Congregational
nunnery go out, and form the teachers for a considerable dis-
trict about the country.
Of the Black Nunnery we shall chiefly speak, for of that
Maria was a Nun, and she informs us that m addition to the
charitable object of the institution, that the nuns, about one
hundred and eighty, were all prostitutes to the priests, about
one hnndred and fifty, including those for a large district, mak-
ing the seminary in the neighborhood of the nunnery their
5
home; that the decency of selection was not even observed,
but that promiscuous intercourse was earned into effect by bru-
tal force and cunning on the part of the priests and generally
by an unwilling consent on the part of the females, who me de-
ceived on taking the veil, when they expect to lead a Utc oi
chastity, but after taking an oath to obey the priests in ail things
are immediately unceremoniously informed by the Lady feupo-
rior.that that oath extends to prostituting their persons it re-
quired by the priests, who being priests, cannot sm ; and this
IS followed up by Maria informing us that on the very evening
of her taking the veil, that Father Dufrcne violated her per-
son and then two other priests, who treated her brutally j that
Father Dufrene again visited her on the same evenmg,anc con-
tinued with her till morning. She informs us too, that these
thin'^s are done in the most brutalizing manner, corrupting the
minS by the most extreme grossness; and when the females are
shocked by such conduct, they are informed that they must
consider it as the will of God, and that it is intended to niorti-
fv the flesh in them. The consequences of this extended sen-
suality, including all the priests and all the nuns m the black
Nunnery, is that a great many children are born in the year,
and Maria seriously informs us that these are at first baptised
and then murdered by strangulation, and privately buried or
thrown into a deep hole in the cellar, into which quick- me is
thrown, and a fluid poured in to take off the smell and destroy
th« body, bones and all. The nuns too, are murdered, if they
resist the will of the priests, or are known to wish to escape ;
andSMaria gives a minute account of one such murder, at
which she assisted. She declares too, that there was nearly a
uniform disappearance of an old nun with the appearance of a
new one, thus implying that the old ones are murdered, leaving
ve^y fTw to die a natural death : even one Lady Superior was
suddenly missing, and another appointed by t^ie bishop Ut
the Bishop, whom she distinctly names, she declares that she
lei him in one night by a private door, and passage which led to
the Superior's room, and that he lay with the Superior foi that
ni<'ht while Maria slept on a sofa in the same room. Fnests
fre°auently retire. Maria observes, into the Holy Retreat suppo-
sed by the world for prayer and meditation ; but which, Maria
declares to be a pretence, and that in those oases they are dis-
eased, and that inconsequence of their disease, n^^s^-^^dis-
eased also; and that when she left the convent, Father Tombau
was in the Holy Retreat. Even the times of confession are
said by Maria to be prostituted to voluptuousness ; and that the
priests corrupt the minds of young girls and novices at that pe-
'-.:ii''t^ .r»»
$
nod, by proposing quoations, implying the grossest conducl.and
by indulging in gross sensuality with nuns who go to confers
.ilone into a room with them.
The Seminary, we remarked, is the receptacle of the prinsts
all around the counay, nnd from that place they visii the nun-
rcry for the purposes now mentioned: Marin, too, assures us
that a subterranean passage leads from the seminary to the nun-
nery.and that another Itvids from liiu Conijregational Nunnery to
the Black, and that nuns from the former establishment visit the
other for improper purposes. Thus Maria mokes the broad as-
sertion that the whole establishment is a brothel for the priests,
who indulge in gross sensuality and murder without compunc-
tion. '
These facts, if true, cannot be too extensively circulated, and
if false, the baseness of publishing them should be unmasked;
especially as respectable names on both sides are connected with
the publication, though no such name is attaclied to the Iwok ;
and if the truth be doubtful from the manner of getting U|) the
book, then the simplicity of those who have assisted Maria in
getting up the book, should be made manifest, and some other
persons more competent should tiike up the subject, and produce
such proofs of the above facts, if belicvea true, as would be in-
controvertible.
THE GENERAL ASPECT.
Gross as the charge is, as made by Maria Monk, there is cer-
tainly a consistency in the whole ; and therefore the probability
IS, that the whole is either true or false, with exception of indi-
vidual cases : if all the priests are given to gross voluptuous-
ness, then that spirit would be seen in their corrt'essions of young
girls, as explained by Maria : children would be born, and must
be disposed of; while the fear of exposure would even suggest
the murder of anyone who should attempt to escape ; for one
crime leads to another : but that the old nu7is should be killed,
or mysteriously disappear as young ones are introduced, ex-
ceeds credibility, ai least at first sight ; for if the idea was pre-
valent in the nunnery, surely the old nuns would seek to escape,
and an exposure would have taken place long ago. In the case
of the old nuns, the account exceeds that of any tale of the
wor«t ages of the church, or when royal protcstant and reallv
interested commissioners had authority thoroughly to investi-
gate nunneries ; the utmost extent of their reports was that they
discovered so7ne convents where the priests and nuns were whol-
ly given up to voluptuousness : it was never pretended that all
the nunneries were in this state; or that all the priests were thus
I'
corrupt; an;! never, as \vr. recollect, thnt the oltl nuns were dc-
sl.ovcd,'— this iH certainly i modern discovery.
"VVc think it witliin th- angje ol possihility that a whole coni-
niunity of priests, pos.scssinir sini^lc l)lfssediicss, in coniiiiiinion
witii women simiiurly siluatcd;should roirupt the women, hound
hy oaths to obey in all things; and we tlunk a youn^ priest so
sitUi»l«Hl, tVeqiicntly cuid'cssinir a heautifid yomi<; nun siiiularly
sitnate(j'iri u room where none duied to enter; that in most ea-
ses the nalnral pussi-.ns would i)irvail over every other leehn- .
but that all the nun t siiould enter in i-norance <t this stale ul
thin^^s, and expecting the mortification of such passions, and
the exercise of personal piety, that these should bo immedialely
inmiersed into invuluntury volui)tuonsntssof the grossest kinil,
involving childniurder inantieipiUion, and ih:it several <d' these
shouh! not make their escape and declare it to the world, is al-
most incredible; (specially as most of these yjunjr women are
really very pious, iind in sincerity take the veil ; that such per-
sons shoidd so act, without ne«iuenl ell'orti; tu cscai.e, greatly
increases the incredibility.
There is indeed one view by which we may suppos'; the con-
vent at montreal more corrupt than others ; and that is the fact,
that '' • '■ ■">' a vvith the French at a very corrupt period, and
the <. 'ng in'o the hands of the British after the lit loi -
' the purii'ying inlluence of those searching
- •iiich transfer took place before the French
d also, the equally purifying eilects of thai
is a counter balance it is now und.;r the
;rlul and ellective Protestant Guverrnneni,
sumumded by r.w.estants, (new colonist,) and a neighl-'! ,
the independuntrrotestant United States; thus aflording means
of protection to any individual who sl.ould make disclosures.
The British Government often oppre s some for policy; but
they do afford complete pr )tection to wh^t are called their sub-
jects, from injury I)y other subjects, however powerlul : the
Morgan murder, an<l the murders in the South, would not have
been committed witli imi>ut,ity, under the powerful protection
ofthc British Government. The Truth oftlie book however
depends upon oth^r circumstances ; thu.s— 1. is xVlaria Monk
credible for tacts, where her eviuencc could have no colatcral
support'? 2. What evidence does ^:he oficr in her power to
obtain besides her own 1 '.). Is there such an accordance beiween
the several of parts of the detail, as to establish thepresumjition
of truth 1 In the absence oi almost all external evidence we
mati
time
Itcvo
great
protectio
t
shall investigate ihc internal, by examining iho above qucs-
h Maria Mank credible for fad a v/herc her evidence could hdve
no colntrral support.
After Muria had been as a fiuvico in the nunnery for/owr ©r
five years, (averai(cd 4i) she left the nunnery without leave,
and bernme an assistant teacher in a common school. Weshall
now quote apart from the book itself. —
" While eniiraged in this manner, 1 becam.' acquainted with a
man who soon proposed marringe ; and your« - and ignorant of
the world as 1 was, I heard hLs ofFer.s with tUvoai . On consult-
ing with my fiiend, she e.xpresscd a friend!)- interest for me,
advised me against taking such a step, and especially as I knew
little about tlie man, except that a report was circulated un-
favourable to his character. Unfortunately 1 was not witta
enough to listen to her advice, and hatjtily married. In a few
weeks, I had occassion to repent of the step I liad taken, as the
report proved true— aieport which I thoujrht justified, and in-
deed required our seperution. After I had been in St. Denis
about three months, finding myself thus situated, and not know-
ing what else to do, I determined to return to the Convent, and
pursue my former intention of becoming a Black nun, could I
gain admittance. Knowing the many inquiries that the Supe-
rior would make relative to me, during my absence before leav-
ing St. Denis, I agreed with the lady with whom I had been
associated as a teacher, (when she went to Montreal, which
she did very frequently,) to say to the Lady Superi r I had
been under her protection during my absence, which would sa-
tisfy and stop furtner inqury as I was sensible, should they
know 1 had been married, I should not gain admittance."
Thus we find Maria a married woman /or a fctv wetks, with-
out stating who is her husband, and what were the peculiar
circumslanccs of her separation : and she distinctly informs us
that she entered the convent under false pretences, previously
arranged ; in which she induced her friend to act a part : and
thus fixes upon herself the character of a rfdikm/eZ?a/-. Her
motive, too, for entering the convent is no higher than " not
knowing what else to do" she does not appear to have been even
in distress, and being on friendly terms with her iateimployer
who even lied to serve her, we s'uppose she might have return-
ed from her few week's marriage to her school again. By this
means Maria procured admittance into the nunnery, for tne
third time, on which occasion she thus speaks:—
k=
.^i.1-
"The money usually rociuircii Tor the inimifsion of noviccR
hadnut. brt'u i.x|»et.lGil tiuiii iiu . 1 hml lu cu a<iii»ilU;d ihf lirsl
lime wilhdiil any :iuih rcciuisiiion; hut now I chose lo p-vy it lor
my je-itdmisiiiuii. I knew tliat fslio (ihe t?U|ti!rior) \v,is able to
dispense vvitlisu(;h ii diinand as well in iLisaa llieloi..K'r case,
and she knew thai 1 was not in possession ol'a.jy llung like the
sum she requireu
Bui 1 was bent on paying to tlie Nunnery, and aceustomed to
receive the doctrine often repeated lo me before that lime, that
when the advaiUa^^eof the cliurcli waHCinisulted, the steps tak-
en were juslihable, let them be what they would. I ihorefoif,
resolved to obtain money on false pretences, conhdcnl, that if
all were known it would '" *• r from displeasing the Superior.
I went lo ihe brigade i ■ ': -, and asked him to give me tlie
money paya'jle to my mu.aer from her pension, wliich amouiil-
U) about thirty dollars, and without questioning uiy authority
to receive it in her namt , he gave me it.
From several of her friends I obtained small sums under the
name of loans, so that altogether I had soon raised a number
o' OL'.ndH, with whith I hastened to the INuiniery and deposited
a part in the hands of the Sup<-rior. She received the money
with evident satisfaction, thoHgh she must liave known that I
could not have obtained it honestly ; and I was at unce rc-ad-
mitted as a novice."
Now unfortunately Maria Monk, establishes her character by
this portion of her *)Ook we have extracted as a thief, extending
her depredations to several of her friends, and undertaken deli-
berately for no very pressing object : Maria attempts to palliate
this conduct h^(mcrthiii\\\\.\X the Superior 7Am.<:/ have known the
money dishonestly obtauied, and, thus making her as bad as
herself; but this is ciearlythe assertion of an acknowledged thief
and liar: the Superior may be as bad as herself, we are not dis-
posed to defend her, but tiie proof is certainly wanting. Maria
in another paragraph insinuates that this conduct is agreeable
to the religious docirines or instructions she had received, and
that if ai^ were known it would " be far from displeasing the
Superior." This we must remark, really savors of Protestant
inlluerce in getting up the book ; it looks very much like a Pro-
testant suggestion : we are not partial to Catholicism, but in
moral honesty, Catholics appear o.i a level with oth jr,;, varying
like other people with circumstances. In pages 8i and 8f),
Maria shows that she was instructed in lying by the Superior,
and that she voluntarly lied to deceive the friends of liie Novi-
tiats, and in page 82 and 83, she shows that the priests instructed
\ ■,'
^^"^
10
her in lying and in Ihe distinction between a religious lie and
a wickca lie : and in various parts of the work, she shows that
she habitually lied, sometimes in conjunction with a nun called
Jane Ray, and sometimes on her own account, for her own
benefit. Now put together her mysterious few week's marriage,
her deliberate deceptions, her obtaining money from several of
her friends as well as her mother's pension by deception, her
acknowledged habitual lying in the convent, and the little prin-
cipal which induced her to enter that establislmient on the third
time, and the conclusions we must coma to, is, that Maiia Monk
is a weak unprincipled woman whose single testimony cannot
be depended on. We proceed now to the second questions.
What evidence does Maria offer, within her power ^ or that of
her patrons, besides her own ?
The answer is, none, from one end of the book to the other
there is scarcely a single reference that is accessible, confirm-
ing any important point in the book ; and yet there was the
means of obtaining iome, and if this some had been procured
it would undoubtedly have led to other cvid ,nce : if however no
attempt has been made to support her testimony by other evi-
dence, there are some indirect references, from which we glean
a little, and which in the hands of an intelligent and diligent
person, would have been the means of ferreting out the truth,
if the truth was desired. In p. 2^4, Maria shows that Mr.Con-
roy the Catholic priest of this city, called o.x her in the Alms
House, but that she declined to see him j she declares he called
several times, and that he waited once an hour in a room where
sbr sometimes was, but still he never saw her; that finding
she declined seeing him, he sent to her several messages by one
or more Irish or other women, and among other things these
messages contained the following, " That I (Maria) need not
think to avoid him, for it would be impossible for me to do so.
That I might conceal myself as well as I couid, but I should be
found and taken." He informed her too, " that he had receiv-
ed full power and authority over me (3Iaria) from the Superior
of the Hotel Dieu Nunnery of Montreal." She says at length,
that she agreed to see him in the presence of Mr. T. (Tap :u
the chaplain) or Mr. S. " which however was not agreed tt..'
She concludes by saying, tJ^at she heard that Mr.Conroy conti-
nued to visit the house: 'once,' she remarks, ' I had determ. fl-
ed to leave the institution, and go to the Sisiers of Charity ; I ut
circumstances occurred which gave me time for further rellic-
tion ; and I was saved jrom the destruction to which I should
have been exposed,^' The last line was marked in italics just
as we have done. Now here we have an indirect reference ;
Mr. Conroy is mentioned, and Mr. Tappin referred to. We
have not seen Mr. Conroy, we find it unnecessary, for we get
better testimony. Mr. Tappin, the Chaplain, informed us that
he believed the book true " except in the case of Mr. Oonroy,
that there were a few things said about hun that were not cor-
rect; that Maria Monk was surrounded by a set of idle vaga-
bond women, who to frighten her i Id her all manner of tales.
If these are not the exact words, they are the exact sense ;
and thus we find that the 07ily fact we have the means of test-
ing is a lie ! in which Maria is supposed to have been deceived
by a set of idle vagabond women ; and this certainly suggests
the possibility of her having bean deceived in other parts, by
perhaps a set of idle vagabond men. Mr. Tappin too tells us
that Mr. Conroy never was there an hour, but that he called
perhaps several times, and as she would not see him he declin-
ed callin«': this precisely accords with the bishop s sttitement
to us on "the subject, and therefore we conclude this account
correct; and Mr. Tappin's testimony extremely honorable to
himself, whatever may be his opinions. When Mr.Hoyt went
to Canada with Maria, he had a fine opportunity to test some
points of importance, and these as we before observed, would
necessdrily lead toother discoveries: and if he neglected such
an opportunity of strengthening her testimony, it satisfies us
that either he dared not make the inquiry, or was incapable of
getting up the work, with what assistance he got. In page '^,,
Maria relates that «^irZ told her of certain mdeceneies of a
priest when at confession, she aftei^vards repeals, p. 29, that
several young women told her similar stories and that these
agreed with her own experience : yet not one of these girls are
named, who are not said or supposed to be nuns ; and these
could have been sought out, and this part of her testimony sub-
stantiated, and thus have rendered probable other parts, m
coHnection with this fact. In p. 28, is the account of the mur-
der of a young beautiful squaw, by a priest, who ran away,
and whose bloody knife was found near the body ; but the wame
of the girl is not given. In p. 113, is an account of a horrid
and brutal murder of a young nun, St. Francis, who had been
abused by some priests, and had imprudently spoken of escape,
and determined not to yield to prostitution This woman was
murdered in the presence of Maria and a large body of nuns,
the Bishop, Superior, and several priests : her friends had been
informed that " she had died a glorious death, and some of her
heavenly expressions were repeated :" yet St. Frances was well
known to Miss Louise Bosquet, of St. Denis, the school mis-
' ii
mmmmm
^-**^
■'«%S»«#ite'
fl
n
li
12
tress with whom Maria had lived : through her, Mr.Hoyt when
in Canada, might have found her friends, v/ho had been cheat-
ed ; and they might have demanded a legal enquiry, under the
protection of the British Government; and in this way the truth
must have been confirmed : but Mr. Hoyt or Maria has given us
no such information, and if each individual wants to test the
truth, he must now go to Canada, and indict certain individuals
belonging to the convent upon the testimony of Maria an ac-
knowledged har and thief; but Mr. Hoyt could have done
this for the whole community, and thus established the truth of
his statements, and made his publication respectable: at the
same time too and from the same people, Mr. Hoyt could have
known the fact of hei few week's marriage, and thus have
tested other parts of her story. In page 16:5 Maria relates that
the Superior cheated an old priest, a little in liquor, by impos-
ing on him an old unsaleable ornament made in the house, and
adds, ' WE all approved the ingenious device, and assisted in
•deceiving him:' the ornament was charged to his account, and
he was obliged to have it. Now this priest is not named.but he
was acce.ssible to Mr. Hoyt, and as no man likes to be cheated
the facts could have been drawn from him, and then we might
believe that a Superior who would cheat, and avail herself of
the assistance of the nuns to assist in the cheat, that she mi^-ht
instruct young nuns to prostitute their persons: this would not
have been positive evidence for other parts, but it would go
lur to render other parts probable. Mr. Hoyt too, might have
had the child sworn to Father Phelin, parish priostof Montreal
and thus have brought the affair into court, and gradually have
brought out the truth : or he might have seen the holy father
privately, and if a liar in the case of Maria', he might have de-
tected it, for liars do not make a very straight storvwhcn closlv
examined. ^
Now as Mr. Hoyt has done none of these things when he
might have done some of them at least. We conclude that
Maria has not snpported her testimony by any other, when
from her character, such support was essential to the credibil-
ity of the work.
Is there suck an accordance hchoecn the several parts of the
detail as to establish the presumption of the truth.
We noticed in the former part, that Maria had given no re-
ference to persons that were available; there is the same neg-
lect of dates, for which indeed she partly accounts, when she
says that m the nunnery dates were neglected, either by design
or accident. If Maria is sincere and her narrative true, this
omission of dates is very nnfortunate for her j but if she has
-«*»i*s' -n.im-
18
not told the truth, the omission of dates may be designed on
her part: but it is hard to conceal the truth, and Maria com-
mits herself on the subject of her age, if Mr. Tappin is correct
in his supposition. In page 20 she relates that she entered the
Catholic school or School of tlie Nunnery, at ten years of age.
In page 30, she relates that she left the school after two years,
at which time she must have hc^vclve ; and befoie this pe-
riod she relates, p. 29, that snc heard at confession v/ords from
the mouths of priests, what slic cannot relate, and experienced
treatment corresponding; and that other females experienced
the same. On leaving the nunnery, Maria informs us that she
soon became dissatisfied, especially with her home, the parii-
culars of which are mo/ explained, and she concludes, " While
out of the nunnery J saw nothing of religion ; if I had I believe
1 never should have thought of becoming a nunp This expres-
sion struck us on first reading, as not natural to Maria, brought
up a Catholic, and who did not a short time since, even after
the manuscript W(.s written, acknowledge conversion. We
thought at first, and we think so now, that it savors of protes-
tant influence, and thus partly deteriorates the work. Being
as she says soon dissatisfied, (without designating the exact
time,) she entered the Black Nunnery as a novice ; after some
prudent delay, and caution on the part of the principals of the
Convent. Maria informs us, p. 43, that she left this convent
after a residence of about two and a half years; her expres-
sion as to time is this :— ' After 1 had been a Novice four or
five years, that is, from the time I commenced school at the Con-
vent, &c." that is, from the time she was ten years of age, and
hence she would be at the, time of thus leaving the Black Nun-
nery, fourteen and a half, taking the average of four or five
years. Maria left the Nunnery, it appears, without leave or
notice: admitting that no opposition would ha\e been made
to her departure, had she made her wish known. On thus lea-
ving the Convent in disgust at the behaviour of some of the
nun°s to her, she went to St. Denis, and resided at first as an as-
sistant to a young lady, her friend, who kept a common school,
and while thus engaged, she married, as before related, before
she was fourteen and three quarters, for at that period she had
been marrie(^ and separated from her husband, and returned
again to the Oihvent; as she remained at St. Denis only three
months altogether : we have before related how long she re-
mained married, and what meat s she used to get into the Con-
vent, and we now only notice it for the sake of the time. ' Noj
knowing what else to do,' she says, she again entered the Nun
nery, and soon after took the veil, as if she were a maid, and
■SIMMHiMMPM
14
*^.-
expecting to be devoted to chastity and religious duties, as she
herself says. Now in the title page, we find that she was a
nun two years, and this would make her not quite seventeen
when she left the nunnery with child by Father Pnelin, parish
priest of Montreal, as she says. She was admitted into the Alms
House, and delivered of a child last Autumn, as we were in-
formed by Mr. and Mrs. Tappin, the chaj)lain and his lady;-
and Mr. Tappin informs us, that ohe was then, when in the
Alms House, or when he was in the habit of seeing her, about
twenty-five years old : now allowing that she was six months
out of the convent before she was delivered, and that is the ut-
most she could be, for she left in horror of child-murder, as
she says, (and she could not be sure of being with child more
than six months before her delivery,) then her age would be ta-
king the average only, and that in favor of her statement, she
would then be seventeen years and a half at the time of her de-
livery, and now she would be about eighteen ; but Mr. Tappin
told us he thought her about twenty-five, and his lady sitting by
and hearing the conversation, made no correction ; and there-
fore she would now be twenty-five and a half, nn age much more
agreeable to the nature of the narrative than that of seventeen
and a half: but the two are incompatible. We have no interest
in this inquiry, nor do we suffer any influence: we called on
the Cath( ic Bishop, and we called on Mr. Tappin, as a strang-
er, and we left as we called, leaving in both cases our name,
but without expressing cither our faith or views, which indeed
were not then definite,as we were only enquiring after the truth.
Mr. Tappin may have been mistaken in the age of Maria, yet
we asked more iniin once, but not so as to awaken any curiosity:
we wanted to get the facts without awakening prejudice; and
we believe we did ; had he said eighteen, we should have pub-
lished it : and we now give the fact as the means of testing th«
truth.
If Maria is now eighteen^ it supports that part of her testi-
mony which refers to the time of her acquaintance with the
nunnery, and some of the transactions : if she is twenty-five
and a half, it destroys a part of her evidence. Our object is
truth, and this the means of testing it. "We have seen in some
periodicals lately, that she is estimated by appearance at about
20, by some who have just had apeep at her since her good for-
tune: the state of her feelings, her dress, an^ circumstances,
■will make some difl'erence in the appearance of her age, and this
may account for the different estimates : but the chaplain was
herconfiidant, and was much with her. and the facts can be as-
,■»*»■ '^
m
eertained, and ought to be ; and she herself ought to have mad«
this matter clear, it was withia her power.
Inconaeclion with her age are several facts: she musthara
been married at the early age of fourteer. and a half, yet thia
unusual early a?e is not noticed: she must have become a nan
between the ages of fourteen and fifteen or before she was fif-
teen ; yet she does not notice the fact, although she even notices
that the youngest girl entered as a nun was but fourteen ; and
when mentioning this fact we should expect a reference to her
own age, which did not much exceed it. Of that young nunshe
says she heard she was much ill-used by the priests, and died
in consequence. We can too scarciy conceive of the Lady
Superior instructing a young girl of 14, or 15 years of age, in
the practice of prostitution on \\p.v first taking the veil,as Maria
asserts,in connexion with the fact, of the girl's being pious and
sincere, and the institution a religious one ; this conduct exceed*
that of the most abandaned procuress or keeper of houses of ill
fame that exist in the most corrupt and volupluous cities in the
Old World: yet the thing is possible. In IMaria's case, who
entered, not knowing what else to do, and after a few weeks
marriage, the case might be different, and the e fleets different
upon her; but the Superior was deceived, supposed her a vir-
gin, and therefore we can sc:ircely credit this initiating in-jtrua-
tion. , . , . , . ,
In page 62 Maria shows that on the day m which she tooK
the veil'p'ather Dufrene took her into a ''private apartment and
treated her in a brutal manner" two other priests afterwards
did the same that evening, after which Father Dufrene return-
ed and compelled her to pass the night with him. In Maria's
discriptionof the nunnery she mentions private rooms appro-
priated to corruptions, and even at confession when xnprivate^
with the priest, while other nuns were outside each urging the
other to go in first, because of the consequences ; still the pros-
titution was in private ; and this is the general idea preserved
in the book ; yet Maria mentions singular exceptions, which if
true are not reconoileable with this general piivacy of the
practices referred to. fn page 35 there is a description of the
sleeping rooms of the novices: thus —
'The beds were placed in rows.without curtains or any thing
else to obstruct the view ; and in one corner was a small roortt
part tioned off, in which was the bed of the night-watch,that is,
the old nun that was appointed to oversee us for the night. In
each side of the partition were two holes, through which she
coull look out upon us whenever she pleased. Her bed was
a little raised above the level of the others. There was a lamp
ill
16
4
hung in the middle of our chamber showing every thing to her
distinctly; and as she has no light in her little room, we never
could perceive whether she was awake or asleep."
Now there is no deliberate description of the nuns bed room,
but we learn indirectly that the apartment for the nuns is nearly
the same : thus, in page 64, speaking of the nuns she thus pro-
ceeds : —
" On Thursday morninir, the bell rung at halt-pass six to
waken us. The old nun who was acting as night-watch im-
mediately spoke aloud :
" Voici le Seigneur qui vient." (Behold the Lord cometh.)
The nuns all rcspoaded :
" Allons— y devant lui." (Let us go and meet him.)
We then rose immediately, and dressed as expeditiously as
possible, stepped into the passage-way at the foot of our beds as
soon as we were ready, and taking places each beside her op-
posite companion. Thus we were soon drawn up in a double
row the whole length of the room, with our hands folded across
our breasts, and concealed in the broad cuff's of our sleeves. Not
a word was uttered. When the signal as given, we al' pro-
ceeded to the community-room, which is spacious and took our
places in rows facing the entrance, near which the Superior
was seated in avergiere."
After repeating the various ceremonies of the day, iliaria
concludes thus : —
" Standing near the door, we dipped our fingers in the holy
water, crossed and blessed ourselves, and proceeded up to the
sleeping room in the usual order; two by two. When we had
got into bed, we repeated a prayer beginning with :
" Man Dieu, je vous donne mon coeur,"
" My God, 1 give you my heart ;"
and then an old nun, bringing some holy water, sprinkled it
on our beds to drive away the devil, while we took some and
crossed ourselves again.
At nine o'clock the bell rung, and all who were awakeTe-
peated a prayer, called the offrande ; those who were asleep
were considered as excused."
Thus then it appears they slept in a body, a watch over them,
and a light in the room ; for the watch or guardian old nun, and
the exercises, supposes a light in the nuns rooms as well as in
the novices ; the parties in bed too were to observe silence. Now
Maria in page 145 after noticing the discovery of a secret passage
leauing from the Seminary, remarks, that she now saw how it
ly^^^
i7
n'as that priests appeared among them without her before know-
ing how they got in, and that tliey could " come up to the door
of the Superior's room at any hour, then up the staire into our
sleeping room or where they chose.^And often they were in
our beds before us." Wo must here remembar that the nuni
slept in a public ronm, with a li^ht and a watch ; that they re-
peated prayers,and those who were awake, renewed their pray-
ers one hour after they were in bed, and with the exception of
these prayers were to keep silence : now, if this grossness were
practised, which we can scarcely conceive commen, even in
brothels— if we can conceive of this public prostitution, in con-
junction too with the ceremonies of the sleeping room; then
we can see no necessity for any private or secret debauches ;
and yet the tenor of the book supposes, and expressly says, pri-
vate apartments were the scenes of gross corruptions. Maria
gives a fact in relation tu this shameful publicity of prostitution,
incompatible with the secret vice, and common prudence. She
descriDes, p. 149, a young girl having taken the veil, and the
name of St. Martin, sleeping on the first night nearly opposite
to her, that she shrieked out in ihu night, and that she disco-
vered the voice of Father Cluiblier, and several nuns assured
tier that that priest was there : the Superior commanded audi-
bly the young woman to obey. JNow that any experienced priest
shoulJ invade in a public room, *he bed of a supposed maid, a
pious girl, and not previously corrupted, except by the suppos-
ed recent instructions of the Superior, is improbable ; for there
was no possibility in public of his using successfully either per-
suasion or force ; and that Father Gtuiblier, i'" he had really
the experience ascribed to him, must have known. Lord By-
ron gets Don Juan into a situation something like that of Fa-
ther Ql. ; but Don J'un's lady, was one of the Turkish harem,
under restraint, with no religious feelings or recent vows of
chastity ; no previous bad spirits ; and yet with all this differ
cnce, Byron Qoes not make his hero succeed. Maria gives one
other case o£ publicity, and on this occasion she selects noble
game— the Bishop Latique and the Lady Superior. Maria
shows that while she was one night attending on the Lady Su-
fierior, and sleeping in her room on a sofa, a bell was rung,
eading from the street to the Superior's room : Maria was sent
along the well known secret passage to answer the bell, whea
she heard the signal hissing, used by all the priests at any lat«
hour; and tnis she answered by the usual ' Hum, hum,' and
then let in Bishop Latique, who finding she was a received,
that is a nun, directed her to conduct him to the Superior's a«
partment, which she did 5 he then " went to bed/ (with the su-
■
r«'
i
i
18
perior, we are left to suppose) ' drew the cu-tama behind him,
and 1 lay down on the sofa until morning, when the Superior
called me at an early hour, about day-light, and directed me to
show him (the Bishop,) the door." Now this Bishop story .be-
sides the grosshess of sleeping with the Lady Superior, while
Maria was in the room, involves other peculiarities which must
be remembered. That any but a received, or a nun, should be
acquainted with the secret passage leading to the outer door, is
not to be supposed, and hence the Bishop asked a foolish ques-
tion ; but these apparently foolish things, serve to detect the
truth; the other inferences we shall leave for the present.
In page 73 and following pages iV/aria gives a minute descrip-
tion of the intcreiior of the building, and ascribes several room*
to particular purposes ; among the rest, one for the nuns to give
birth to children in ; another for priests deseased from sen-
suality ; and a third for nuns aiFected by the diseased priests,
one for the baptism of infants before they are st.angled, and a
deep hole in the celler into which murdered bodies are thrown
on which quick lime and afterwards oil of vitriol is thrown: the
majority of the rooms however are forordmary purposes. Maria
sets her credibility on this description of tlie apartments,and this
is u very weak point, for the discriptioa of the room be correct,
excppt the purposes to which some of them are appropriated
and yet the tale of infamy wrong . Maria's best evidence is her
being with child, if it can be clearly shown that she became
with child while a nun ; and that as a Black JNun fshe never left
the nunnery, while priests alone where the only men permitted
to visit her and other nuns: this is good evidence and what
she could have estabhshcd to demonstration, if true: she could
have shown on what day she left the Nunnery, and that she was
with child at that time- and if the conductors of the Nunnery
could not show that she was turned out of the establishment
for iretling with child, by a breach of some order, the inference
would be that the father of the child was a priest j and Father
Phelin might be he as well as any other. If xWaria could not
recover dates while in the Nunnery, it is absurd to say she
could not remember the day she left it, and who she first saw,
and all the steps since till the birth of her child ; yes, you read
from the page 220 to the end about her leaving the Nunnery
and coming to New York up to the present time with out a sin'
gle reference. This l^ict we think condemns the book as false,
or the authors as men incapable of conceiving, collecting and
presenting i\\e proper evidence for such important facts ; Maria,
the publishers, and those who assisted her have only said she
was with child while a nun, and that none but priests had access
totheNunnery; she had it in her power *-> prove it: shehasnot
^.•^
^
19
done 80. and thus rendered the story dependant on a thievish
Ivini <'irl without leferences which would estabhsh her credi-
bility °even if a liar, and which references she might have
^Tpa<^e 93 Maria says that three or four days after she entered
the INunnery, blie was sent for coal (charcoal) and she thus
describesherperilojsjouiney involving numyawlul particulars.
This charcoal >:xpedilion, is we think one of the most extraya-
eanl statements in the book.for Aiaria does not say sbe lost her
way she does nol 3ay that the dreadful hole which she discovered
was uncovered by accident, she does not say that it was unusual
to have charcoal in so inconvenient a place ; all is lelatcd as a
common statement of facts, and these are her words :—
" Three or four days after my reception, the Superior sent
me into the cellar for coal ; after she had given rne directions,
I proceeded down a staircase, with a lamp in my hand. 1 soon
found myself upon the bare earth, in a spacious place, so dark,
that I could not at once distinguish its form, o- size, but I obser-
ed that it had very solid stone walls, and was arched c.vci-
head, at no gieat elevation. Following my direction I proceeded
onwards from the foot of the stai, s, where appeared to be one
end of the cellar. After walkinj^ about fifteen paces, I passed
three small doors, on the right fastened with large iron bolts
on the outside, pushed into posts of stc:ne work, and each Imying
a small opening a'-ove covered with a fine g'ating, secured by a
smaller bolt. On my left, were three similar doors, resembling
these, and placed oppofite them.
Beyond these, the space became broader ; the doors evidently
closed small compartments, projecting from the outer wall ot
the cellar. I soon stepped upon a wooden floor, on which were
heaps of wool, coarse linen, and other articles, apparently de-
posited there for occasional use. I soon crossed the floor, and
found the bare t^arth as^ain under my feet.
A little further on, I found the cellar again contracted m
size, by a row of closets, or smaller compartments projecting
on each side. These were closed by doors of a dificrent de-
scription from the first, having a simple fastening, and no open-
ing through them.
Just beyond, on the left side, I passed a staircase leadiiiii up,
and then three doors, much resembling those first discribed,
standing opposite three mor" on the other side of the cellar.
Having passed tnese, i found the cellar again enlarged as be-
fore, and here the earth appeared as if mixed with some whitish
substance which attracted my attention.
■
<H'^
7
!
fn'^^ ! ^L^Tl®'^' f r!'"'' '^^ whheness increase, until the sur-
face looked almos hke snow, and in a short time I observed
before me, a hole dug so deep into the earth that I could perceive
f»piv ""•.r.^''°f;P''' to observe it.-It was circular, perhipS
twelve or hfieen feet across ; in the middle of the cellar and m
K:iit^o^it:-r.tKai.^"^'^'^^ ^^^^-^ -^"'--^^^ ^-
The whit-! substance which I had observed, was spread all
over the surface around U; and lay in such quantity on all sides
that |t seemed ns d a great deal of it must have been thrown
mo the hole It immediately occurred to me that the white
substance was hn.e and that this must be the place where the
m ants where buried, after bein^; murdered, as the Superior had
inlorined me. I knew that the l.n,e is often used by Roman
Catholics in burying-places; and in this w.iy 1 accounted for
its being scattered about the spot in such quantiti. s
Ihis was a shockmir thought to me; but 1 can hardly tell
how It affected me. as I had already been prepared to eipec
dreadful things i« the Convent, unci had ui,<lergone trials wS
prevented me Irom feeling as I should formerly have die in
simdar circumstances. ^
I passed the spot, therefore, with distressin'^ thoughts it is
true, aboitt the Uttle corp.es.' which miglu fa's in S «ocrit
bury ing-place but with recollections also of the .leciarations which
1 had heard about the favour done their souls by sending them
straight to heaven, and the necessary virtue accompanying all
the :»ctions of the priests. r / &
Whether I noticed them or not, at the time, there is a window
or two on each, nearly against the hole, in at which are some-
times thrown artic es brought to the.n from without, for the use
ot the Convent. Through the window on my right, which opens
into the yard, towards the cross street, lime is received trom
carts ; and I then saw a large heap of it near the place
Passing the hole, I came to a spot where was another proiec-
Uon on each side, with three cells like those 1 first described
Beyond them, m another broad part of the cellar, were heaps
of vegetables, and other things : on the left, I found the charcoal
1 was in se;.rch of This was placed in a heap against the wall
as I might then have observed, near a small liioh window like
the rest, at which it is thrown in. Beyond this^pot, at a Lhort
distance, the cellar terminated-
The top cjuite to thr.t point, is arched overhead, though at
different heights, for the earth on the bottom is uneven and in
some places, several feet higher than in others. '
Not hking to be alone in so spacious and gloomy apart of the
,,jMs«p
T
It IS
Content, especially after the discovery, I hftitened to return."
Now this extract is to us satisfactory ; Charcoal for daily
use never could be put in so inconvenient a place : the terrible
hole in the floor never would be left uncovered. This hole,
properly examined, serves to determine the whole questim :
the Catholic priests ouglit to submit this cellar to examination,
and Maria, Mr. Hoyt, and others who have piomottd this hor-
rible Disclosure, ought to be obligid to promenade this cellar,
and Maria out;ht to point out thf spot where this hole is, or was,
for if it be filled up, the spot will yet remain, and the filling up
must be distinguished from the other parts which h-we not been
disturbed : if this hole has not been disturbed, the contents at
the bottom slio .Id then be chemically and mechanically exam-
ined, and the remains of murdered humanity must be detected ;
for we find by an entry in a book, Maria says she discovered
with Jane Ray, that every month affords a new supply to the
amount of three or four children, besides the majority of old
nuns, and murdered young one.i, who may not submit to brutal
force or voluntary prostitution : but if the bod'es, bones and all,
be decomposed, then the result, or compound substance will re-
main, and tell a tale as true; for there is no deception in che-
mistry ; and if the bottom be dug out or altereu, a mechanical
or close investigation will discover such alterations, and afford
at least strong grounds for suspicion •, besides, the use to which
this hole is applied, must be explained. This hole, then, af-
fords the means of testing the truth of Maria Monk's and her
assistant's Htory. Should it be found true, the guilty should be
brought to justice and suffer the indignation of the public; and
should it be proved false, Maria and her guilty partners shrndd
be made to feel the pains and penalties due to calumniators of
the blackest die. As to the passage to the Seminary, and that
to the Congregational Nunnery, these might be sought after
too; but they would prove nothing material ; for these might
exist like the general order of the apartments, and be harmless:
the use to which they are alledged to be put, being only crimi-
nal.
The death of St. Frances, in the presence of the Bishop and
the Superior, five priests and many nuns, including Maria, who
took a part in it, as related in pages 114, 15, 16, 17, &c., is in-
credible; for why should it be so public; people disposed to
murder, seldom call witnesses, when the murder could b» ( qual-
ly well effected without it, and the old nuns, we are leu < un-
derstand, are quietly murdered ; whereas, Maria says, this St.
Frances was gagged^ thrown on a bed, covered by another, and
that tlien the priests and nuns jumped on the bed with much
€r^
11
22
■atisfaction, till the victim was destroyed : the priest Bonin it
distinguished in this transaciioti as most ferocious, nnd Father
Richards is representt-d as wishing to save her.
Equally public are the children murdered, who are said to be
strangled by the old nuns, attrr being baptised. Mai ia says
she witnessed the (!cath of the twins of St. Catharine, but one
month after the death of St. Frances : and her pre.sonce appears
accidentjl, as if no cwre w.is taken either to conceal or fami-
liarize the nuns lo these scenes. One of the nunneries, we re-
mark too, took in foundlings; surely some of the children said
to be born in the Convent, might have found a safe assylum
there, wuhout recourse to unifoim murder.
In p. '219, &c. AJaria relates her escape, (without date, or
whom she first saw as before related) she shows the difficulty
she had !o escape, and implies that nuns cannot get out if they
would ; yet she shows in ano'her ptirt before referred to, that
priests come in at all hours in the night ; ring the bell leading
to the Superior's room; thai they make a hissing noise, and
that the nuns let them in after replying by ' Hum, hum,' in or-
der that they might not be deceived. She shows, too, that she
actually let in the Bjshop through this secret passage to the su-
perior's room, and let him out again by the direction of the Su-
perior. She had also access to all the i\ oms by her condition
as a nun, and sometimes slept in the Superior's room, as on the
very night she says the Bisiiop slept there: What difficulty
was there then in letting herself out 1 None, according to her
ovvn showing; and she and any other nun could go out at any
time with very little contrivance ; just as easy as she could let
in the Bishop and show him out.
If Maria was very young and not 2r) or 2C, as the Chaplin
supposes, then there is an immense difficulty is her having a
companion in Jane Ray, about 30 years of age : and in all her
actions with that female, which supposes a person of maturer
age, instead of a girl of fifteen or sixteen at most: her employ-
ments of reading to the novices &c. but ill comports with that
early age, for many of the novices must then be her superiors
in age,k!!0'-:cd -,and behaviour,as she does not represent herself
as be'.ng; extraoi nary in ability.
Maria relates that all the priests including a large dl trict of
country, are debauchees, and partake of the crime of murder,
by being actually engaged in it, or sanctioning ii, and that all
the nuns are profltitutes to the priests : and that thosmpf ; iie Con-
gregational Nunnery, or some of them visit the Black .unnery
through t^-. subterranean passage for improper purposes: now
the Nuns of the Congregational Nunnery Maria informs us are
the teachers all about the country, and surely some of these
23
would have repent'^'l ami *'ave disclosed the secrets of the esta-
blishment; but no disclosures have been made by them. The
prests to(. ent' r oil their studies young ; and some rome from
abroad; and some are fonvcrtcd from other religions; some
may no doubt be very vvirkcd men, but that all shr)uld become
debauchees and murderers is inciedible: <il what time are
young and innocent students initiatod ; when arc (he foreigners
introduced into ih. sn abomioable corruptions 1 When arc the
converts made u tjuninted with ihes,;' new ovidcnces of the truth
of this religion. Father Richards is well itnown in this city as
a former Mohodist preacher, and as amanofgroaf humanity:
he it waswh, n-. isb' d to save St. Fnuicis, uiid this fact has be»n
pointed out to us by some lespcciiible Methodist as [iroof of
Maria's story: but if Father Richards was sincere in his con-
version, and retains his liumanity, and honesty, could ha sanc-
tion child murd r: cculd he sanction the murder xho. St. Francis
by his consent, and aficr silence, even though he did apparent-
ly wish to save her; oris this assumption of his wish to s-.
her put in to suit his former known (haracter: and thus in .;-
ftlity sets him ;;i,-ainst himself. A Methodist preacher and hu-
mane manb.^comes a Camidian Catholic priest, and then prac-
tice* adultery, and partakes in the murder of infants, refractory
nuns, and old nuns, to make way for new ones, but yet retains
his humanity, and wishes to save St. Francis: the thmg is ab-
surd: in the course of years there must have been some priests,
who would have been conscience smitten, and have divulged
the secrets : yet no priest, converted or not, has ever exposed the
supposed inhom.mitv iuid corruptions.
Throughout IMaria's book there is a marked Protestant tone
and inttu'cnce-, concealed indeed ns much as possible: we >iave
no objection to Protestantism; indeed we prefer it to Catholicism
in every form, but we must be impartial, and we mu^it admit that
there is throughout the book strong marks of Protestant in-
fluence and prejudiice, which sugs^est the idea that those who
assisted iVlaria were among that class who would wish the con-
tents of her book true. Marks of this kind will be found on the
title page, in the Scripture quotation; in p'M_'e !>9, wheie she says
" being'unaccustomeu to Protrxlant societ;/, she heard wo appeal
to the Bible," siee also puges 20, 21, 25 and 26, and 31. In page
101 she says she did'nlknow what I. H. S. means; this perhaps
was the case, but that she should evpre.«s it in the presi: ' tense
and not say that she had since learned it, from Mr. Ho, t, Dr.
. Brownlee or others assisting her in her book, shows a Protestant
wish to prove Catholic ignorance ; and an attempt to conceal the
author of the suggestion : in 209 is the same spirit, she is made
to say speaking of the liquid poured into the hole in theceller,
^4
she " thinks the liquor was called vitriol or some such name ;"
■he adds it will penetrate flesh and even bones ; now this soriie
such name, can only be explained by a contracted wish to make
outCutholic ignorance; as if any woman had never heard of
oil of vitriol, by itscominon name,and know its costic properties
The marks throughout the book of Protestant influence are too
numerous to note, for this the book itself must be seen.
We now notice a-ain that the book accumulates all that has
ever been said against tlie worst nunneries in the worst ages •
and makes even additioiis to them. We do not however think
it a reprint ; this accumulation of crimes in" one nunnery and
that she should witness them ail in two years, at a verv voune
aga, is a miracle. / / 5
We noticed also, that the book had no ostensible author or
responsible persons connected with it, but the publishers who
must make money, and could therefore afford the risk; Maria
IS irresponsible, from her character and situation , Mr Hoyt
has not put his name to it ; Dr. Brownlecand Mr. Bourne have
not publicly acknowledged what assistance they rendered • Gor-
don, to whom the copy-right is secured, was paid as an agent
we learij from Maria's present friends; and he is to receive a
small sura from each edition. Maria, too, was to receive $80
on every new edition of 1000, guarantend by the Harper's. We
have this from an attorney who saw the documont, and who
concludes unfavorably of Maria, from her rude manners in pri-
son, when she visited Hoyt there, and her familiarity with him
*' Hoyt, what has that fellow Conger against you ; you know J
have plenty of money; you shall not stay here an hour," were
among her femiliarities. Maria in distres; , in the Alms House
and with child, has turned these untoward circnmstances to ad-
mirable account, with the assistance of Mr. Hoyt who is not
now in repute, even by Maria's frie.ids. The Catholics should
prove, if possible, whtrc Maria was, if not in the Convent or
at once admit her residence ; the former may be difficult- but
Maria should have sworn the child to Father Phelin, and made
other individual charges, which must have brought on an ex-
amination ; and she should have given her history out of the
Convent, as the means of tracing her to and from the Convent
and fixing the fact of her being with child while in the Black
Nunniiry. She has net done so ; we have therefore no confi-
dence m her Narrative, in herself, Mr. Hoyt, Gordon, Dwi^^ht
the alledged editor, Mr.Bourne, or Dr. Brownlee, names unfor-
tunately connected with strong prejudices against Catholics
and with most intolerant spirits, '
Just out M.Pt. 'Faaaticisvi,' or Narrative of habella, by G. V.