Vv^ 
 
 <^:^.''^'' 
 
 ^ 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 «^ IIIIIM 11112.5 
 
 IIM |||||Z2 
 
 m ^^^^^^ 
 
 i4o mil 2 
 
 sa=^^ III I ^■^' 
 
 1.8 
 
 
 1.25 1.4 
 
 1.6 
 
 
 ^ 6" - 
 
 
 ► 
 
 V} 
 
 <? 
 
 //. 
 
 "cr-l 
 
 (^.. o\ 
 
 ^ >' 
 
 j^,'>?' 
 
 
 O 
 
 /j 
 
 °^* ? 
 
 
 7 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historicai Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du 
 ooint de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la m6thode normale de filmage 
 sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. 
 
 □ Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 □ Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 n 
 
 D 
 
 Couverture endommagde 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur6e et/ou pelliculde 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 I I Coloured maps/ 
 
 n 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Reli6 avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serr^e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intdrieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes 
 lors d'une restauration appiraissent dans le texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela dtait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6X6 film^es. 
 
 Additional commeMts:/ 
 Commentaires su|)pl6mentaires; 
 
 □ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Paqes endommagdes 
 
 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaurdes et/ou pellicul6es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages d6color«jeo, iachetdes ou piqudes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d6tach6es 
 
 □ Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 Quality indgale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel supplementaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Pages v^holly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6t6 filmdes 6 nouveau de fagon 6 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filrn^ au taux de reduction indiqu6 ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X attx 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 y 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 32X 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 Library of the Public 
 Archives of Canada 
 
 L'exemplaire filmi fut reproduit grAce A la 
 gintrositA de: 
 
 La bibliothdque des Archives 
 publiques du Canada 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Las images suivantes ont it6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetA de l'exemplaire fSlmA, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat do 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. A!* 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrate'i impression. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprirnie sont filmis en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 derniire page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont filmAs en commen^vnt par la 
 premiere page qui comporte une ' tpreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la derniAre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol — ^- (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning 'END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaftra sur la 
 dernlAre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbols — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to oottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 film6s A des taux de rMuction diff6rents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour §tre 
 reproduit en un seul cliche, il est filmd & partir 
 de I'angle sup6rieur gauche, de gauche d droits, 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la m6thode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
ma^mmmmmmmmmm 
 
 PROVINCIAL POLITICS. 
 
 1890. 
 
 REPORT OF THE SPEECHES 
 
 DELIVERED BY 
 
 HON. MR. MOWAT, 
 
 HON. GEO. W. ROSS, 
 
 MR. EVANTUREL, M.P.P. " 
 
 IN THE 
 
 LEGISLATIVE ASSEJWBLY. 
 
 APRII^ 3rci, 1890. 
 
 ON THE 
 
 Proposed iiiK^ndmoiits to I he School AH |n relation to 
 
 the iteo «ft' the rr«>nt'h Laiigua«fe iu the 
 
 Public idchouls. 
 
 Copies of this ^-pfech. mn be.had b^^ adJrtaidng^ B^.T.lJt '■f'-reoton 
 Secrelart^ l^ivvincial lietomi Aseo^Aation, Torovto. 
 
 • • • . 
 
 Kl 
 
 ®orotit«> : |i 
 
 PRINTED BY HUxNTER, R03E & CO. 
 
 ISIM). 
 
• •»^ 
 
 « •-, •■■•, 
 
 ' ».».♦» 
 
FRENCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 sp^eech: 
 
 DELIVKUKD BY THE 
 
 HON. GEO. -W. ROSS, 
 
 m THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, 
 
 APRIL 3rd, 1800, 
 
 IN REPLY TO AfRT.D. CRAIG, MEMBER FOR EAST 
 
 DURHAM. 
 
 The MiniateV of E<Jucatiori who rose at eleven o'clock amifl 
 hearty applause from his friends, be^^an his reply with the remark 
 that if the emiorsation which the hon. gentleman predicted for 
 his party were similar in character to that which he had received 
 from hia conatituonts, it would be quite satisfactory to this 
 side of the House. (Go/ernment cheers.) Mr. Rosa then pro- 
 ceeded to comment upon the importance of the ijuostion that had 
 been thrust upon the House last year and this by his hon. friend. 
 He had remarked last year, in reply to the hon. gentleman's stric- 
 tures, that composed as we were in Cana<la, of different races 
 and of different creeds, we should be careful not to arouse racial 
 ur creed differences which would imperil or di-sturb the harmony 
 of feeling that should exist in a 3'0uni( country like Canada. He 
 had emphasised this view and iiad endeavored to show that in 
 the history of Great Britain and the United States, and several 
 countries of Europe, they had abundant evidence that the way 
 to build up a national sentiment and to unify a people was to bo 
 kind and tolerant to all races and creeds that rec< gniised a common 
 Government. He held that view still. It was the view of the 
 Liberal party. He charged the hon. gentleman, intentionnlly or 
 otherwise — he did not know which — with fomentin'j the race 
 agitation that was at present disturbing the people of the coun- 
 try. Such an agitation was injurious to their well-being, and 
 
 wmm 
 
4 FRENCH SOHOOLS. 
 
 the hon. gentleman's own constituents so fully recognised this 
 fact that they were not prepared to send hiiu back to the IIoumo 
 Again. (Cheers.) ^ 
 
 BACE AN IMOSIIY A CALAMITY. 
 
 , He repeated that such a condition of things as the hon. gentle- 
 man would have brought about would be most calamitous to this 
 .young country. Just look at it. Canada was only 2'i or 24 
 years of age, and one-third of its population was of French oii- 
 «in. What would be the effect on the million and a quarter of 
 French people in Quebec, on the thousands of French people in 
 Nova Scotia/ New Brunswick and Manitoba, if the impression 
 went abroad that theio was anything like unkindness or unfair- 
 ness, or any want of magnanimity on the part of Ontario in deal- 
 ing with the race minority of the Province ? Such a condition 
 would be most disastrous from a national, and a ndigious 
 stantlpoint. It was impossible to deprecate too strongly the 
 views expressed by the hon. gen*^Ieman and by the press of his 
 party. It would be most injurious to us as a young people if 
 the discussions that went on from time to time in this Uouse 
 should have the effect — as he feared, they already had to some 
 extent — of creating religious and racial animasitios. Carlyle yaid 
 that " History is Philosophy teaching by experience." New let 
 us briefly review the history of this question. 
 
 HISTORY OF FUENCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 French schoools were established years ago in Essex, Pres- 
 cott and Russell. The founder of our school system had to do 
 with them as we had now. Everybody admitted the prudence 
 au'l foresight and statesmanship in educational matters of the 
 late Dr. Ryer.son. Hon. gentlemen opposite were as loud in 
 their eulogies of him as they were themselves. Did he deal 
 harshly with them ? Did he attempt to make Engli.sh the only 
 language in the schools? He gave them the fullest liberty 
 as to the langua'ro to be used in the schools and as to the 
 character of the teaching that should be permitted. He need 
 hanlly wait to point out how unfair it was for hon. gentlemen 
 opposite to direct their attacks against him for wliat he had 
 dotiH, without a word of censure on Dr. Ryers on during tho 30 
 years of his administration and withoufi a word of censure on 
 the four years' admitiistration of" John Sindheld Macdonald. He 
 would not wait to dilate upon that, but would simply remark 
 
FflKNOH SCHOOLS. 5 
 
 that one of the ])eafc educators of the Continent — a man whose 
 famo had crossed the seas — a man of eminent ability and fore- 
 thought had permitted this system to grow up without eny 
 of the jestrictiona as to teachers, and text- books, and language, 
 such as he had imposed. Dr. Ryerson had applied the same 
 rule to German Schools as to French. His expectations were • 
 that the two races, surrounded as they WDuld be by an over- 
 wliehning English majority, would become Anglicised by English 
 teachers and English institutions, and that in this way a social 
 revolution would take place, v/ithout any iriitation or agitation 
 whatfeoever. Dr. Ryerson was wise in his time. Early in the 
 history of Waterloo county there were nearly 100 schools in which 
 German only ' as taught, and a large number of schools in Pres- 
 cott and Russell in which French only was taught. The rovolu- 
 tion whii^h Dr. Ryei-son desired had been aceoniplishod so far as 
 German Sciiools were concerned. 
 
 RESULT OF DR. RY'-llSONS POLICY. 
 
 When he (Mr. Roi^s) came to deal with this question he found 
 there were no German schools in which English was not taught, 
 and only twenty-seven French schools in which there was no Eng- 
 lish taught. It was evident, therefore, that by Dr. Ryerson's calm 
 and peaceable policy the schools were becoming anglicised. 
 Now, this was true philosophy — it was the teaching of experi- 
 ence in Canada, and it was the teaching of experience else- 
 where. Could his hon. friend say that the measure now pcoposed 
 to the House would have brought about a better state of thing's 
 than the silent growth resulting from social surroundings to which 
 Dr. Ryerson trusted so much. As a philosopher, — if the hon, 
 gentleman is a philosopher, — he will admit that the strongest 
 force in national growth is that which works gradually and Irom 
 within. There is a genius of action as well as a genius of waiting, 
 and the genius of waiting is the rarer gift. ])r. Ryerson had this 
 genius ; he had the courage to wait and he lived to see a social 
 revolution brought about without irritation or disatiection just 
 because he had the courHgo to trust to the natural effect of the 
 Anglo-Saxon institutions whidi surrounded the French and Ger- 
 man people in Ontario. (Cheers.) 
 
 SHIRKING THE RESPONSIBILITY. 
 
 His hon. friend was very anxious to impress upon the House 
 that he did not desire to raise a race cry. Was his hon. friend 
 
6 FREN'CH SCrtOOLS. 
 
 sure that ho had not laiscJ a race cry already ? Was l)o siiro that 
 hiH Hpeech last year was not irrit-atinpand disturbing? (Hear, hear.) 
 If he road the papers he would find that it was regarded hy the 
 French people an an atuck upon their language, and he was sure 
 the hon. gentleman would regret some day that he had made that 
 speech and had projected in this country such a disturbing elerhent. 
 His hon. friend had said tluit the time given for the study of Eng- 
 lish in the schools of Prescott and Russell was not sutticient, and 
 states that six hours a week was the time prescribed by the regu- 
 lations. The hon, gentleman is quite mistaken as to the time 
 recommended to be devoted to the study of English. In the in- 
 structions to the teachers of French schools issued in Sept., 1885, 
 it was distinctly stated that at least two hours per week should be 
 given to classes 1 and 11, and four hours per week to classes 111 
 and IV, or twelve hours per week in all, and that circular was in 
 the collection of papers he had on the desk in front of him. His 
 hon. friend in his Bill proposed to allow one hour a day for the 
 teaching of French. What evidence had the hon. gentleman that 
 one hour was not too much in some crises and so limited a time 
 in other cases as to be utterly useless ? Could an arbitrary rule 
 such as he proposed, be drawn successfully ? He thought not. The 
 instructions sent out by the Department in October last contakied 
 the only directions that a man with any pretensions to be an 
 educator would adopt in de.iling with this question. They said 
 in effect that the teachers should be governed by the cucumstan- 
 ces of the school. There might be circumstances under which 
 half an hour would be sufficient ; but the matter was one that 
 might very well be left to the trustees. (Cheers.) 
 
 Bi-Hiujual Headers. 
 
 There was one other matter to which he wished to refer before 
 dealing with the Bill of his hon. friend, and that was the policy 
 of the Government with respect to the Bi-lingual Readers. The 
 leader of the Opposition in his London speech declared himself 
 oppo-sed to Bi-lingual Readers on the ground tliat their use 
 would tend to perpetuate the French language. His hon. friend 
 froiu East Durham, however, had said nothing with refer- 
 ence to that. The poli2y of the Government with regard to 
 the use of Bi-lingual text-books had the highest sanction that a 
 policy could have. Take for example the case of Wales. It 
 had long been a grievance there that the children were un- 
 able to study Welsh in the elementary schools f the extent 
 desired. The matter was inquired into by a Royal Commission, 
 
FREKCH SCHOOLS. 7 
 
 who reported upoH the subject last year, recoraaienditig the use 
 of Bi -lingual readora in Wales. That Commission consisted of 
 many distinguished men — Lord Cross, Lord Harrowby, Lord 
 North brook, Sir John Lubbock, Canon Gregory, Canon Smith, 
 Cardinal Manning, the Bishop of Ix)ndon, Dr. Dale, and others. 
 In the code adopted by the Education Department in 1881), Bi- 
 lingual readers vere recomra^mdod for Weluh schools. He had 
 therefore the sanction of the British Royal Commission for his 
 policy and also the smiction of the Education I)opartment of 
 Great Britain. 
 
 POLICY IN GREAT nRITAIN. 
 
 before 
 policy 
 The 
 limsolf 
 eir use 
 friend 
 refer- 
 Bravd to 
 that a 
 les. It 
 ere un- 
 extent 
 lission, 
 
 The Scotch code of 1888 allows one shilling extra t6 be ))aid for 
 every pupil in the elementary Reader who is partly taught 
 by Gaolio teachers, and further, it allows Gaelic to be taught 
 dunng the ordinary school hours cither by the regular teachers 
 or any person Hficciall}' employed for the pur^pose. The code also 
 provides for an examination of teachers' in Gaelic reading, 
 translation and composition. 
 
 The Commissioners on National Education in Ireland have 
 authorised for the use of Irish schools a series of Bi-lingual 
 Readers. From the annual report of 1888-9 of the Society for 
 the Preservation of the Irish Language, it appears Irish was 
 taught in 41 schools. Teachers are also subjected in certain cases 
 to an examination in Irish-Gaelic, and an extra allowance is 
 made by the Govern iiient for the pupils who pass a .satisfactory 
 examination in Irish. It will be seen, therefore, that the British 
 Govt'mment, which has had some experience in forming a 
 national character, so far from prohibiting the use of Welsh, 
 Gaelic or Irish, rather encourages the study of these languages; 
 and there was no complaint made, so far as he knew, because 
 public funds were emploj'ed for this purpose. Surely the honor- 
 ,able gentleman is loyal enough to admit that the example of 
 Great Britain i? a reasonably safe example to follow. 
 
 POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES. 
 
 Then what do we gather from the United States ' In order 
 that there might be no doubt as to the policy of the Americans 
 on this vexed question, he communicated with Mr. W. T. Harris, 
 Chief of the Bureau of Education at Washington, from whose 
 letter under date of February 8th, with the permission of the 
 House, he would make a few quotations : 
 
rilENCH 8CBOOL8. 
 
 Department of the iuterior, 
 Bl'kiuu or EbuuATUH, Wamuikutok, O. 0., 
 
 February 8, 1890. 
 
 Jlon. Otorge W. Hobs, MmuUr of Education, Torontu, Gatuuia.' 
 
 My Dkak Sia,--I havo the honor to acknowledge thu receipt uf your lette 
 of the 2Uth ult., in vrbich ynu re']uett to be furnished a " itatHinent abdW- 
 ing the various States uf the Union in which any other language (and what) 
 than Kiiglish is alluwod by the luw of the tSlute or by usage to be taught in 
 any of the elementary schools." 
 
 Tu enable me to auswor respecting State laws, I have caused an examina- 
 tion to bu made, and find that there is no legal provision, either prohibitive 
 oT permissive, of foreign languagfs in Aluhama, Arkansas, Gunnectiout, Dela- 
 ware, Florida, Qeorgia, luwa, Louioiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mii- 
 sisnippi, MissoDiri, Nebraska, Nevada, iSew JBami>shire, JSew York, North 
 ' Carolina, Oregon, Rhode IdancJ, and Vermont. 
 
 The law expressly requires that the schools be taught in the Bnglish 
 language in California, Colorado, Indiana, and Kansas. 
 Several States have special provisions, viz. : 
 
 Indiana. — German shnU be introduced as a course of study In any schools 
 where tlio parents of 25 or more pupils demand it. 
 
 Euutuoky. — In any district wnere one-third of the pupils are children of 
 other than English-speaking parents, their respective lurfguages may be added 
 to the course oF study. 
 
 Maryland. — VVhore there is a conf-iderable German population, school oom- 
 missioiiers may cauRC German to be taught. 
 
 Ohio. — The School Hi>Rrd of any district shall cause the German language 
 to be taught when a demand is made in writing by 75 resident freeholders 
 representing -10 pupils. 
 
 With your permission I will add here the substance of a letter which I 
 wrote on January 3rd to Mr. H. E. Clark, a member of your Legislature, in 
 reference to permitting instruction in a foreign language in the Public 
 Schools. I said : 
 
 *' It u a snbjuot on which I have decided convictions and much expedi- 
 ence. It ia the question of assimilating in the best manner a foreign elemefft 
 found in the community, either as the remnant of a once conquered people, 
 Uke your Canadian French, or the residuum of a wave of immigration like 
 tho German population in our ^Northwestern States. 
 
 " I am decidedly in favor of a plan that has proved equal to the emer- 
 gency in our Northvvoat. I inaugurated it in St. Louis, Mo. I gave instruc- 
 tion in the writing and speaking m ihe German language one lesson a day to 
 all German pupils and to all Antrlo-American pupils who desired to learn 
 German. This provision was carried out in all schools where there were 
 enough pupils to w.-\rrant the appointment of a teacher for a half or for a 
 whole day. (By the word 'school.' as technicilly understood by ns, is 
 meant an organization under one head teacher assisted by from one to thirty 
 assistant teachers, and having from one hundred to fifteen hundred pupils or 
 more.) The result in St. Louis was to bring all German children into the 
 Public Schools, and to break up entirely the private schools which had ex- 
 isted before. M my Anj/lo-American children availed themselves of the 
 opportunity to learn Gorman. A great advantage was found in thia in the 
 
FRENCH 8CH001-S. 9 
 
 fact tiiat tho foiling of caste was rapidly obliterated by tho niiituaJ reapoct 
 vn^eiidorod amonK the pupils by uarncKt ctt'urts to Kiarn coch the other's 
 native laii(;uage. 
 
 *' I have no qiinstioti that this is a policy that vrould have tbe same results 
 ill the Ficnch proviuoe in Canada. Tench them good Parisun French, and 
 at the earuu tiuiu f' qinro thoin to learn the majority of their luasons in Kiw* 
 linli, and the results would be ioon to have an entire population of Hu^luk- 
 ape u king people. 
 
 *' Very rtispeotfuUy, your obedient servant, 
 
 " W. T. liAnKlM, CummUsiomr," 
 
 This is tho experienco of one of the l)e«t edurntora in the 
 I7nit<'d Statt'H and who was Hclected by Fiesidcr '-farrison for 
 the highest educational position in the gift in tlie /Veruraent. 
 
 TUK UKllMAM LANtJUAOiil. 
 
 On the s£. fv ;ubject Dr. Peaslee, late superinU-ndo- of Public 
 Schools in Cincinnati ia answer to liie objection Ji.x the stud/ 
 of Genuan should nc i be allowed, savs : 
 
 '* But,'* It Is said, " this is America, and therefore, ihe Eiiglish langu /<* 
 only should be taught in tho Public Schools ; teaching the (lornian la'iL'Uage 
 tendA to make our citizens Ifsn patriotic, less American. ' " Are," 1 atk. *'Gea- 
 Curl ScliufB, Gen. Frank Si^el, and the tens of thousiiiids of other Cn<rniarui 
 who fought in the Union Army, in tho last war, any loss true Ainericau cit- 
 izens, any less pit riotic, bvcauae they \\«re educated lu the Germai. UTipruet 
 \re our Geruian fellow-citiz-na any len y^atriotio than the Biigliah whose 
 mother toiivue ia that of our country, are the (Germans in their native coun- 
 try, aie the Germans in their native land any le»B devoted to the institutiona 
 of Germauy, because tho French language is tau^ht in thousaixhi of their 
 schools 2 " Mo one, I ttiink, would answer these qutstions in the affirma- 
 tive. And until they can be »o answered it is idle to say, that a knowledge 
 of, or the teaching of Gixman or any other foreign lan;j:uagQ, is adverse to 
 patriotism. The truth is, that our German ft'llow-ci'izons are noted foi^ 
 their attachment to the free institutions of America, and are among our most 
 patriotic citizens, as a class much more so than the Kngltsh." 
 
 THE FRENCU LANUUAaE. 
 
 Even French is permitted a place in the United States. The 
 Legislature of Louisiana at ita session in 1888 provided by Aet 
 No. 81, 
 
 "that the elemenfary branches may be taught in the French lan^ua^e ia 
 those parishes in the State or localities in i^jiid parishes whnre the French 
 language predominates, if ro additional expeii'^e is incurred." 
 
 Will the hon. gentleman contend that these American States 
 are entirely wrong in their educational policy ? He will surel/ 
 
 r?vrM?«?I r 
 
10 
 
 FKIiNOH SCHOOLS. 
 
 admit that the Americans are a progressive and far se*^lng people 
 and that in the last hundred years they have made gigantic 
 strides as a nation. How did thoy assimilate the millions of Ger- 
 man, French and Italian immi^jrants that settled within their 
 borders during the present century? Was it by arbitrary legis- 
 lation such as is advocated in certain quarters in this Province, 
 or did they trust to the assimilating powers .of the dominant race ? 
 (Cueers.) 
 
 POLICY IN EASTERN' PROVINCES. 
 
 Then we have the example of other Provinces of the Domin- 
 ion : — In Now Brunsk.vick the Bi-lingual Readers, which wo 
 have just authorised are used by 287 schools ; in Nova Scotia 
 by 73, and in P. E. 1. by 33, and their use is recomme'^ded by some 
 of the most prominent educationists in Manitoba. With sucli 
 weighty precedents he (Mr. Ross) could not be far astray in re- 
 commending the introduction of the Bi-lingual Readers into the 98 
 schools in Ontario where the French language is spoken. Then, 
 what is the situation in the Protestant English schools of Mont- 
 real ? There the French language is compulsory in every form. 
 On the 0th Sept, 1889, E. W, Arthy, Soc. of the JProtestant Board 
 •of Commissioners, wrote him as follows : — 
 
 "The study of French is compulsory in every Department of the Protea- 
 ■" tant Public Schools of Montreal, except the preparatory classes of the 
 " Common Schools, which consist of infants G au<\ 7 yeara old — who attend 
 "half the day only. No French is taught in these classes, but in all higher 
 " classes French is taught and the study is compulsory." 
 
 What an example of tolerance and good sense is here presented 
 to the hon. gentleman. The Protestant minority living in the 
 midst of a French and Catliolic community have such perfect 
 confidence in the English language that they are not afraid of 
 its being di.«;placfd even if their children do acquire a thorough 
 mastery of French. (Cheers.) 
 
 ACTION BY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT. 
 
 It became liis duty as soon as ho took oifice to ask the House 
 to consolidate the School Act and Regulations, and in dealing 
 with the latter he ])ropo8ed that English should be taught in 
 <iveTy school in Ontario, The words of the regulations are as fol- 
 lows : — 
 
 "The programme of studies herein provided shall be followed by fha 
 toachcr as far as the circumstances of his school permit. Any modifications 
 
FRENCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 11 
 
 g people 
 gigantic 
 1 of Ger- 
 ia their 
 7 legis- 
 *rovince, 
 nt race ? 
 
 Domin- 
 hich we 
 a Scotia 
 by some 
 ith such 
 7 in re- 
 o the 98 
 Then, 
 if Mont- 
 ry form, 
 t Board 
 
 e Pro tea - 
 )8 of the 
 ho attend 
 11 higher 
 
 resented 
 \ in the 
 perfect 
 Praid of 
 borough 
 
 e House 
 
 dealing 
 
 Light in 
 
 e as fol- 
 
 1 by the 
 ifications 
 
 -deemed iicceasary should bo made only with the concurrence of the inspector 
 and trustees. In French and German Schools tJm authorized Headers shixiUd 
 he used in addition to any text boolcs in either of the languages aforesaid." 
 
 His hon. friend had said so many censorious things that one 
 would have thought he had been living upon sour grapes during 
 his absence last summer from Canada. He had nothing but 
 bitter words for the government, the Attorney- General, anc^ for 
 himself (Mr. Ross). lie was not magnanimous enough to spend 
 one moment in paying him a single compliment for making Eng- 
 lish compulsory in all the schools of Onturio. Why this want of 
 generosit)' ; surely it cannot be necessary for purely party pur- 
 poses to be ungenerous towards an opponent. What is the hon, 
 gentleman to gain by declining to recognize what the country 
 knows to be the case, what every member of this House knows 
 to be the fact, that he (Mr. Ross) was the first to make the study 
 of English in every school the unmistakable policy of the Educa- 
 tion Department. In the face of such conduct on the part of 
 the hon. gentleman, he must not be surprised if he is told he is 
 not the exponent of a broad policy, but is the representative of 
 parti7.auship and intolerance in its most contemptrble form. The 
 hon. gentleman says that the regulations of the Education De- 
 partment are inoperative, are disregarded and wotild be disre- 
 garded in the future. Wliat justifieition has he for the state- 
 ment i Does not the correspond L'nce before the House show that 
 the number of schools in which English was not taught is steadily 
 decreasing since 1H85, the date of the regulations ? that while in 
 I8S7 there were 27 departments in which no English was taught, 
 in 1888 there were only 6, and in 1889 English was taught in 
 overy school. What did the Commissioners say on this iwint ? 
 Aftor having visited every school in which French was taught in 
 Prescott and Russell, they say : — 
 
 I. That some Eugliah is taught in every Bchooi. 
 
 II. That the Ontario Headers ha/e been introduced into every scbool. 
 
 III. Tnat the pupils are usually well supplied with English reading books. 
 
 IV. That in at least twelve schools the work done in English is much be- 
 ycnd the amount prescribed. 
 
 V. That in 24 sohooU n>ore time is (liven to English than that prescribed 
 ia the circular; in (> '.he time preacribul is given, and in 28 less th m the time 
 prescribed is given. 
 
 VI. That in very few schools has sufF.clent attention been given to collo- 
 quial exercises. 
 
 MISTATEMKNT COKllECTED. 
 
 The hon. gentleman argues on the assumption that he (Mr. 
 Ro&«i) had sail that every pupil was learning English and learil- 
 
 m 
 
12 
 
 FREN'CH SCHOOLS. 
 
 ing it thorouglily. He never made such a statement. He wn-»j 
 aware that English was not tauo;ht to every pupil. He was not 
 aware noi* had he assumed that English was well taught in every] 
 instance. The words he used on that occasion were : — 
 
 "It is not to bo assumed that English is aa well taaght in the BchoyiB of] 
 Eastern Ontario aa in some of the older counties. Due allowance must U- 
 made for local conditions in considering a matter of this kind. Jn fact, in a 
 Province extondiug over an area so great, no fair comparison can be madt I 
 at least between counties remote from each other.- There are poor school: 
 fven in i!;g <)lder counties; there are poor schools in the northern parts (<) 
 the counties of Frontenac, Hastings, Haliburton, &c,, etc., and to say thin 
 some of the schools in Prescott and Rus'^ell are in a backward condition is! 
 merely to assert what perhaps may be said of many schools iu the county O" 
 York, or Miidleaex, or O-^iford." 
 
 It had become the practice of hon. gentlemen on the opposit.. 
 side of the House to quote very largely from newspapers. Theiv 
 were a great many reports last year as to the condition of thf 
 schools in Prescott and Russell. They had reports from the Mail 
 and the Telegravn,, and there was some uncertainty as to the true 
 condition of affairs, and he felt it was desirable, in the lace ot 
 so many conflicting statements, that he should know authorita 
 tively how matters stood. The hon. gentleman said they were 
 compelled to appoint a Commission to inquire into the condition 
 of the Prescott and Russell schools. The hon. gentleman never 
 nude a greater mistai:o. They were compelled by their sense o! 
 dut}^ by their desire to ascertain the truth, just as they had ap- 
 pointed Commissioners to inquire .into other matters. They wer*. 
 anxious that there should be no doubt as to the true facts in the 
 case and the Commission was appointed accordingly. 
 
 HIGH CHABACTEll OF COMMISSION. 
 
 The Commission consisted of Rev. Prof. Reynar, of Victoria 
 College ; the Rev. D. D. McLeod, of Barrie, and Mr. J. J, Tiiiey, 
 men of the highest standing in their various walks in life — and 
 men who could not be approached with a view to induencin«^ 
 their judgment and he ventured to say they had not prepared u 
 partial or »mesided report. The hon. gentleinan ssays — reiteral 
 ing a statement made by the Leader of the Opposition in his Lon 
 don speech, — th-t the Commissioners were very anxious to shield 
 the Minister of Education. 
 
 What right has the hon. gentleman to impugn the character ol 
 these Commissioners ? Two of them are leading men in their 
 respective denominations, one a Methodist and one"a Presbyterian. 
 
 iil 
 
FRENCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 13 
 
 He wtJ 
 I« was not 
 
 it in every 
 
 10 flchugis of I 
 !co iniiHt be 
 u fact, in aj 
 n be mail( 
 I>oor schools 
 ern parts of I 
 to say thai j 
 condition is 
 le county o 
 
 opposite 
 ra. Thei. 
 ion of th. 
 the Mail 
 o the tru< 
 ;he face oi 
 aiUborita 
 ttiey weit 
 i conditio!) 
 mnn nevci 
 ir sense o( 
 jy lud ap- 
 rhey wer x 
 lets in tho 
 
 Vietorit; 
 J. Tiliey, 
 life — and 
 iHuendn*; 
 prepared m 
 — reiterat 
 a his Lon 
 » to shield 
 
 [They were selected because of their experience, education and 
 [their high standing as citizens. Bepause tliey did their duty, 
 [because their report contained the facts as they found tliem and 
 
 because these facts did not serve the purpose of the hon. gentie- 
 itleraan, he is unkind enough to intimate that they were partial 
 I jind unfair and tried to sliield the Minister of Education. The 
 ! opinion which he seems to have formed of their report is at vari- 
 fance with the one formed by competent judges elsewhere. For 
 
 instance : 
 
 The Ca)wdian Baptint said "This evidently impartial report, while it does 
 not perhaps add largely to the infonuaiion already p )38e88od by those who 
 havo followed up tho discussiou in the Legislature and in the press, will be 
 of great service as tjivinc;, in cmcise form, a reliable basis for iufereuoe and 
 uotion. Most unprejudiced persons will, we think, agree that the recom- 
 niendationa of the couiinissiun are mninently judicious. They include about 
 all the action timi< seems neot^'saary and desirable." 
 
 The Caiiuduin Prenhyleriau said, " As was to be expected from men of 
 their churaoter and standing, they did their work with diligdiico, th' rough- 
 ness aud impartiality. Their report has just been issued and it is strictly 
 correct to say that it ia untin^ed by political coloring. Tne report is valu- 
 [.uble because it presents a clear and unbiu8.std Btatement of the actual state of 
 ait'airs iu iheae schools domiuaied, as ilioy largely an-, by French Roman 
 Oatuolic influences ; i^. will aho, doubtless, lead to tho adaption of thw cor- 
 rections ueoessary to preserve the integrity and usefulness of the Public 
 Scho'il system in Ontario." 
 
 77<« trti>b[iier'\an htxitw said, "With the refort we are much pleased. It 
 is full, onrelul'y prepitred and clear. '1 he CininiiPBioners have den** their 
 woik well, Hud we are happy to a^ree to the recoiiiinendatious they make." 
 
 Thi-, I hruttian Ouarduin said, " As fur as wo can jtidue, the Oommissioners 
 have dont* their work with great thorcut:} ntes and fuirnese " 
 
 The I'vrinito Mail said, •' On tiie wholo the Corjimihsioners appear to 
 "have d<»ne their work thornuyhly and conscientiously." , 
 
 T/ie o^^awa C'i/ia^n (Tory) said, "It was hinted in some quarters that the 
 '* lep- rt ot the Ctiniuiissioiitrs aj'poiiited by the OntaTio Depariment of Ed- 
 " n Cation to investigate the condition of the Public Schools of the Province 
 ''in Connies wheie the Freiich-Cnnadian itfiulation ia ntimerous would 
 i'l)r'>ve a nhitewatihinu one, and that the oljtot aimed at wouhi not be 
 '.'attained; but a careful eX>imiiiation of the report, biitfly summarized 
 .' in ye8terda>'8 Citiztn, shows that the C 'mmiseioiiera performed th© duty 
 • 'a-ioigutd to them in a most caieful and thorough manner." 
 
 The hon. gentleman claimed that a Conservative should have 
 been on the Coininis-^ion. Why ? Did the hon. gentleman serious- 
 ly CDiitetid that the truth was only to bo obtaineil from Conserva- 
 tives ? (Uear, hear.) 
 
 FKFNCH AND GEllMAN SCHOOLS. 
 
 aractof ol BTho hon. gentleman bronoht him to ti«k for havinir said in his 
 
 in their Hiipuecli iu i'orouto la^t June, that the German schools were pre- 
 
 Jbyterian, ^ 
 
14 
 
 FRENCU SCHOOLS. 
 
 oiaely in the same condition as the French schools, and in answer to 
 this invention of his own brain, ho quotes from the report of 
 the Oommifisi'oners to show that there was no similarity in 
 the condition of the two schools. What led him to this con- 
 cJu.'ion no one could tell. The words used by him (Mr. iloss; 
 on that occasion were — 
 
 •'I come next to consider that most disturbing of all questions — Frencl* 
 "and (lerman schools — and I bracket these two because every oLjectiou 
 "that applies to one applies to tlje other. From an Anglo-Saxon sland- 
 " point they ire both foreign lan|(uages, and national charucteriativ:^ have 
 "very little to do with the question." 
 
 lie was then discussing the French and Geitnan schools from a 
 racial stauJpoint. He argued that if French was a foreign lan- 
 guage so was German, ana that Anglo-Saxonizing was as much a 
 necessity in the one case as the other. He was discussing the 
 question whether under certain circumstances it was not desir- 
 able and proper that French should be used as a language of in- 
 struction in addition to English, so as to teach the French chil- 
 dren English through French, just as German children would be 
 taught English through German. From a national standpoint 
 they were in the same position. It was natural that the French 
 child who learned French should bo taught English through the 
 medium of that language, just as a German or Gaelic child 
 should 1)0 taught English through the instrumentality of hist 
 native language. 
 
 MK. CRAIG'S plagiarism. 
 
 He came now particularly to the Bill introduced by the hon. 
 gentleman, and first he would mentiim that every clause in it 
 which IS of any value Wfis stolen fiom the regulations of the 
 Education Department, and those that were not so stolen were 
 worse than useless. By the first section of his Bill he declares 
 tliat Engli.'^h shall be the language of e\(iry Public and Separate 
 School in tliis Province. Where did he get this section? As 
 everybody knows, he got this from the Regulations ot August, 
 1885, amplified by the Jlogulations of the 10th of February last 
 as follows : — 
 
 ■*(I'^) It shall be the duty of the teacher to conduct evrcry exercise and 
 recitation 'rum tlje t<rxtbo<.kf* prescribed tor I'ublio Schoo'H, in the English 
 layuiiat^e, and all cnrnmni i ;atuiii between teaclu r and pupil in regard to 
 matters of (iitoiplino and m tiie nianaj^emont of the schocd shall he in 
 Eujjlish, except so far as this is iuipracicable by rea-^ou of the pupil not 
 understjinding Ennliah. IlMcitatinna in French or German may be conducted 
 in the language of the text-book." 
 
FRENCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 15 
 
 mswer to 
 report of 
 lanty in 
 thi.s con- 
 Mr. iloss; 
 
 as — Frencli 
 y objection 
 ixon Bland- 
 rutics have 
 
 ols froni a 
 )reign 1 an- 
 as much a 
 jussin^ the 
 3 not desir- 
 aage of in- 
 reach chil- 
 n would be 
 standpoint 
 the French 
 [lirough the 
 aelic chiW 
 ity of hit? 
 
 by the hon. 
 
 ause in it 
 Lioiid of the 
 stolen were 
 
 he declareti 
 ,nd Separate 
 ection ? As 
 s ol August, 
 cbruaiy last 
 
 exerciBe aiiJ 
 
 n the English 
 
 il m regard to 
 
 ahall tQ in 
 
 the pupil not 
 
 y be conducted 
 
 y 
 
 >i 
 
 By (jec. 3 of his bill he provides that no teacher is to be employed 
 
 permitted to teach unless he is capable of speaking the Eng- 
 
 , hianguago. Another case of petty larceny, as the following 
 
 Bgulation of the Education Department passed in l^h5 provided 
 
 an examination in English and covers the same ground. 
 
 |155. In addition to the examination conducted in the French or the Qer- 
 111 language, ever]^ candidate for a teacher's certificate bhall be required to 
 hs such examinations in English grammar and in translattoa from French. 
 [German into English, as may be prescribed by the Ri)ard of Examiners. 
 
 By sec. 4 of his bill the teacher may use any language under- 
 )od by the pupils in imparting instruction in all cases where 
 pupils do not understand English. This section was also 
 i]en from the Regulations of the Department, and is strangely 
 [variance with the statement made by the hou. gentleman last 
 
 ir. 
 
 )n the 9th of March, 1889, as reported by the Empire, he 
 [r. Craig) said : — 
 
 I* Ho had shown that the situation was a very serious one. Were they wil- 
 
 ig to have two languai^es in this Province ? In the Public Schools of 
 
 )ntario, if such were not the desire of the people, the Englinh lant,'uage 
 
 hj should be taught." ***** "He did not wish to speak a 
 
 roid against the French language, bat as this was essentially an Ensclish 
 
 Deaking Province, they could ojily have one languaije in their Publio 
 
 jhools. That was the great proposition whioii he wished to l«y down." 
 
 mt has become of the GREAT proposition laid down by the hon. 
 itleman last year ? It. has vanished into thin air, 
 5y sec. 6, the teacher who violated the provisions of the hon. 
 itienian's bill, should it become law, is to be dismissed appar- 
 ^ly without .]^<^gf<^ or jury. This clause was not stolen from the 
 hilationsof the Department. By sec. 7 the use of French is to 
 |allowed for one hour per day until Parliament enacts other- 
 ^0, So we are going to postpone the great panacea of the hou. 
 ^tleman for making us a united people until Parliament gets 
 (ly. Why such procrastination. By sec. 8 the privilege of using 
 French language in the instruction of pupils who know no Eng- 
 i.H to be withdrawn absolutely, in case the provisions of the 
 gentleman's bill are wilfully violated. If a teacher violated 
 section the children would be deprived of instruction in 
 Inch altogether, and consequently would not be taught at all. 
 would visit upon the heads of the children, not the sins of 
 ir fathers — that would bo according to Scripture — but the sins 
 ihe Board of Trustees. 8uch a measure could not be passed 
 
rzmimamBm 
 
 1« 
 
 FRBKCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 through any legislative body anywhere, not even in Japan. (Ap. 
 plause.) One serious omission in the bill, in spite of all the stolen 
 sectionij it contained, was that it made no provi«ioa for the 
 training of teachers in English. This omission he reQfarJed nsj 
 fundamental. The Commissioners stron'jly rec<»m mended the 
 establishment of a training school for French tejichers. Howl 
 were we to introduce English into the schools, except through th« 
 medium of teachers qualified to use it properly in the school- 
 room ? 
 
 BILL MUST BE REJECTED. 
 
 He asked the House to reject, the second reading of the 
 Bill, and i\» so doing he hoped that the la^t had l)t.en ho»iid 
 of this question. It' they were going to keep before their 
 minds the purpose of those who founded ConCederatioM, it I 
 would not do to have the public agitated by discus-inns 
 that f( stered a cleavage between French and English. The 
 French had been as loyal to Canada as any other pni t.oii of tho 
 population. They hud defended it against attack frtj i within 
 and without, and we had a right to respect their language and 
 even their prejudices, for were they not our own kith and kin? 
 If they would build up here a great nation they must look be- 
 yond the narrow horizon of a school secunn, or of a few counties, 
 or even be^'on 1 the horizcm of the Dommion itself, and the further I 
 they looked the more thiy found the policy of the Government 
 sustained by the great countries of the woild. It was that policy 
 which had helped to make England the mistress of the seas, 
 which had enabled Switzorhind for centuries Lo maintain hLT>elt' 
 in her Alpine retreat, and which had helped Germany and Austria, I 
 ra spite of internal strife and conflicts with other nations, to bo-| 
 come- two of the great Powers of Europe. Such a p"licy, too. 
 would lielp to build up a great nation in Ontario and in Canada. ] 
 (Applause.) 
 
 Ak'. Meredith replied to the Minister of Education and was| 
 follo^ved by the Attorney-General : — 
 
 TUE ATTORNEV-GENERAL 
 
 The Attorney-Gonrral, on ruins? shoitly before two o'oloclc, yrxt ^(Sfh*d\ 
 urUh louii cheers. He said that at that lute hour it wonld not b« beooiui i J 
 on his part to occupy the attention of the D[i»UBe very long, nor did thtif 
 Bpeech of hia hon. friend, heated although it was and excited, aitd iajpas-' 
 sioned aa its delivery no doubt was, contain much that r» quired an answer, , 
 It was absurd for the leader of the Opposition to say that the G iveru'iient 
 did not desire the French population to learn English. If his hon. trienJ 
 
FRENCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 m. (Ap. 
 ihe sullen 
 , for the 
 GfarJed as I 
 iided the 
 ra. How j 
 roufjh tho 
 be bcliool- 
 
 g of the 
 •en hoard I 
 fore their 
 ratioM, itl 
 ii.scua-ir»ns 
 ish. The 
 ou of tho 
 i 1 within 
 ,aago and 
 
 and kin I 
 b look be- 
 T coun'.ios, I 
 ,he f lU'r.her 
 )vernm(!nt 
 hat policy 
 
 the aeas, i 
 lin hLTnoll I 
 ui Austria, 
 ons, to bc- 
 edicy, too. 
 .a Canada. 
 
 I and waal 
 
 bo btsuoiui ii{| 
 nor did the] 
 and ioipas- 
 1 Hii answtr, 
 G ivern'iiedll 
 I hoD. iriunJ 
 
 really aeriously meant any luob statement as that he muat be pretty nearly 
 lij'proaching abaolute idiocy. (Oheers and laughter.) Hifl hon. friend waa 
 not in that poaition — he knew very well bow the matter roally waa, but he 
 thought just now it waj in the interest of hia party to represent things as 
 being difl'erent to what they were. The Government were as anxioua as he 
 was to see their French fellow-snbjocts speak the English language; but the 
 difficulty was how to bring about that result. The plan propos. u by his hon. • 
 friend waa a very bad one, and if carried into efl'ect, not more EngUsh would 
 be loamed, but less. The Government wanted English to be learned by the 
 Fnnch portion of the population, but they wanted them also to be friends. 
 Nothing could be gained by proscribing the French language in the achoola, 
 but a great deal waa to be gained if they recognised to a certain extent the 
 use ol' that language in the schools. The French population contributed to 
 tho support of the schools, and the object sought could be secured a thona- 
 and times more effectually by respecting their prejudices, by respecting their 
 love for their language^ by respecting their desire that their children should 
 bo tAu^'ht their own tongue, than by adopting a coercive policy. (Cheers.) 
 He wanted the French children to learn their langutige, to study their lan- 
 guage, to read books in their language, and he wanted them all to study the 
 lati^;uage and literature of England. Ilis hon. friend had said that ho could 
 not imagine what the policy of the Government was, and challenged him (the 
 Attorney- General) to tell him their policy. The hon. gentleman couli be 
 , very obtuse when he wanted to be obtuse. The Minister of Education had 
 I already appealed to the '* Instructions for Teachers " for the purpose of show- 
 ling what their policy was. The member for London had read those instruc- 
 [ tiuna, and after reading them it vi as absurd for him to pretend that he did 
 not know what the policy of tho Government was. The hon. the Attorney- 
 Guneral then went through the instructions seriatim as regards the use of 
 I French in the schools and the directions for the teaching of Eaglish, point- 
 ling out that the French children were not to study French only but to study 
 [English also. The policy of the Government was to have English taught in 
 [the schools, and to adopt the best methods of teaching it and the best 
 n)et}iods of educationists elsewhere had been adopted. There no doubt was 
 [in some counties a scarcity of teachers qualiBed to teach English, and the 
 Government wanted to remove that state of things as speedily as possible. 
 Tho Government recogni8«d the necessit^y for doing something, and were 
 Itaking steps to provide teachers where that scarcity existed. The Govern- 
 ^neut were anxious to have children thoroughly trained in English, and with 
 that object in view they were adopting the methods that experience had 
 :'roved to be the best. The object aimed at could never be accomplished by 
 exhibiting s. spirit of hostility tc the French population— certainly nqt by 
 jrosoribing the use of French in the schooh. The Attorney-General quoted 
 from correspondence previously used by him in his recent speech at Wood- 
 Itock to show that Dr. Ryerson and the whole Council of Public Instruc- 
 lion had regarded the use of French in tho French Schools in the East much 
 U they regarded the use of English in the English Public iSchoola, and 
 Ihowed how this condition had. gradually changed until the recent regula- 
 |ions of the Education Department had been issued, by which English was 
 
 be thoroughly taught and teachers thoroughly trained in English in every 
 
 'lool in those counties. (Loud applause.) 
 
 « 
 
 Mr. Evanturel. 
 
 It was nearly half-past two o'clock when the Attorney-General ceased 
 leaking. Mr. Evanturel rose for a moment and expressed his regret that 
 
'Tm 
 
 18 
 
 FRENCTH SCHOOLS, 
 
 the lateness of the hour precluded his continuing the debate, and correcting 
 the nuDierous InaocuraoieB nrhicb, he caid, the speeches of Mr. Meredith and 
 Mr. Oraig contained. He felt bound, however, to jxiint out to the hon. gen- 
 tlemen thai thui " sjllabaire," which he and Mr. Oraig had condemned aa 
 vehemently on account of its alleged Roman Catholic teaching and prayers, 
 did not contain one single Roman Catholic prayer or doctrine. If the hou. 
 gentlemen had been able to read French they would have seen this, and the 
 fact that such a circumstance had esonped the attention of two Toronto Uni' 
 versity gr:u)uate8 who had examined the little volume lowered his estimate 
 of the Provincial University by fifty per cent. He would have bet^n happy 
 to translate the whole contents of the volume for the benefit of the House if 
 the hour had been earlier. (Oheers.) 
 
 ■i! 
 
FRENCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 19 
 
 M EMOR ANDTJM. 
 
 Since the delivery of Mr. Ross' speech the Empire has publish- 
 ed what appears to be an official report of what Mr. Craig said 
 m the debate on French Schools. In order that all matteiB 
 in dispute might be fully covered, the following auppleinen- 
 tary observations are aj)pended. Mr. Craig made a special effort to 
 fasten upon Mr. Ro.ss the charge of misrepresentation if not falsi- 
 fication in connection with the French Schools. The tirst state- 
 ment made by Mr. Ross in his speech last year ^hich Mr. Craig 
 challenged was as follows : 
 
 Ho (Mr. Robb) denied that the acboois of Eastern Ontario were inferior in 
 the seiide dijscribod by the iiieaiber for East Darham. The reports of the in- 
 spectors go to show that these schools are doing excellent work, even French 
 pupiU beating English pupils at departmental examinations. The member for 
 East Durham should have informed himself on the condition of the schoola 
 of PJastern Ontario before making a charge that they wer'i not in an elUciont 
 condition. 
 
 Ill L'Orignal English is taught, and there oould not beany complaint with 
 respect to the teaching of English in the schools in the extreme eastern part 
 of the province, 
 
 Anmver. 
 
 Tlie information on which this statement was based is contain- 
 ed in Mr. Summerby's report (Sessional Paper, No. 48, 1887) and 
 is as follows : , 
 
 To give you an idea of the character of work done in English, in some of 
 our French Schools, I may here draw vour attention to the fact that I men- 
 tioned to you when I was iu Toroni" Ijttt month. Four pupils from one of 
 these schools passed the Entrance examination to the High Sctiool during the 
 year 1886, one in July and three in December. All four of these pupils 
 speak and write both languages ; two of them are the children of French 
 speaking parents ; two of them English-speaking parents, and one of them 
 is but eleven years of age. One of the French pupils made a perfect paper in 
 dictation, spelling every word correctly and beating all the EngliBh-speaking 
 pupils. 
 
 in the western part of the inspectorate there are no High Schools, and ad- 
 vanced work must be done in the Public Schools, or pupils wishing to go 
 forward in their studies have to leave home to attend school. Some of our 
 pupils attend Hi<j[h Schools in adjoinin>r counties, and as in some of these 
 schoola medals and scholarships are awarded pupils taking the highest marks 
 at the Entrance examination, we have thus a means of comparing our work 
 with that done in neighboring counties. Several times of late years jur pu- 
 pils have taken gold and silver medals at the Kemptville High School, and 
 tii(7 have also taken Bcholarships at Ottawa Collegiate Institute. 
 
 ilHMl 
 
m 
 
 20 
 
 FBENCH SCnOOLS. 
 
 In iome of our Public Schools pnpils are prepared for the tetieher** exRm- 
 inations. During the past two years several have paused district examina- 
 tions ; three the third claas examination, and one the second cUbh exam- 
 ination. The secoii,! clans candidate was but fourteen years of age and had 
 passed the third class examination the previous year. 
 
 All of which is respectfully submitted. 
 
 (Signed) 
 
 W. J. SUMMERBY. 
 
 "School luHrjBCTOu's Offiok, 
 
 "January 4th, 1888. 
 
 Sir, — At the beginning of last year T asked my assistant, Mr. Dufort, to pay 
 special attention to this subject (English) when makin;^ his inspectoral visita. 
 The result is that we have reduced the number of purely French departments 
 from twenty-seven to six, and T hope to be able to report, at the end of the 
 present term, that these six have fallen into line. At last summer's exami- 
 nation for teachers for our French schools, all candidates totally ignorant of 
 English were rejected. I do not wish it to be thought that I am satistied 
 with our present attainments in this respect. As 1 have said in previous 
 reports, our weak point is a staff of teachers having an imperfect acquain- 
 tance with the English tongue. But I think we are going forward as rapidly 
 as can be expected under tlie circumsbances, 
 
 " Yours truly, 
 
 "W. J. SUMMERBY. 
 
 "Russell, 23rd February, 1889. 
 " Dear Sir, — Last year I had to report that we had six schools in whioh 
 English was not taught. Mr. Dufort has made a verbal report to rae that 
 these six fell into line during 1888, so that we can now say that English is 
 taught ia every Public School in the counties. 
 
 " Yours truly, 
 
 "W. J. SUMMERBY. 
 
 " CuRRAy, 25th February, 1889. 
 " Sir,— Last year according as I made my first visits I in8i8te<l on all the 
 teachers that they had to teach English, and also explained to trustees and 
 parents the necessity of having it taught. The result is that I now have the 
 pleasure of stating that English is taught in all the schools more or less. 
 
 *' Your obedient servant, 
 
 "0. DUFORT, 
 
 "Assistant I. P. S. 
 
 I 
 
 Tbe statements oC the Inspectors were confirmed by the Com- 
 missioners, as the following extracts will show : 
 
 " I. That some English is taught in every school. 
 
 " II. That the Ontario Readers have been introduced into every school. 
 
 •' III. That the pupils are usually well supplied with English reading books. 
 
 61 
 
FRENCH SCHOOLS, 
 
 21 
 
 " There can be no question m to the fact that in all the French schoola in 
 the several counties visited, notwilhstanding pai ticuUr cases of backwardness 
 or ineflScienoy, an efTort is being made to impart a knowledge of the English 
 language ; and not only so, but this work is reoeiving a larger amount of 
 attention at present than in former years. Thero are some of these schools 
 in which English has been well taught for many yean, so that they are prac- 
 tically English schools. There are also some, as will be seen from the sta- 
 tistical atatf>ment forming part of this report, in which the Enjy^iish language 
 is largely used in the work of the school. This is the case more particularly 
 in the counties of Essex and Kent." 
 
 Unauthorized Text Books. 
 
 Mr. Craig states that Mr. Ross denies that unauthorized books 
 were used in the schools in Eastern Ontario. Mr Ross never 
 made such a denial, on the contrary, as reported in the Mail, ho 
 made the following admission : — 
 
 ''There was a certain violation of the Regulations of the Department in the 
 French Schools in Eastern Ontario in that they used French text -books not 
 authorized but books authorized for mixed schools in Quebec. Ho bad ob- 
 tHined in the French language those used in the Maritime Provinces and had 
 sont them to the Central Committee for repoi*t. The prospect was, therefore, 
 that in a short time they would have French text-books as undenominational 
 as were tho books used in the Pnblic Schools." 
 
 From beginning to end the reports of the speech show that 
 what Mr. Ross said was true and is true, and that nothing has 
 been disclosed by the Commissioners, or by any other evidence 
 submitted so far, to show that his statements were inaccurate. 
 
 REGULATIONS OF THE EDUCATION DEPART- 
 MENT. 
 
 EESPECTING FRENCH AND GERMAN SCHOOLS. 
 
 Approved, February IQth, 1890. 
 
 (1) In school sections where the French or German language prevails, the 
 trustees, with the approval of the Inspector, may, in addition to the course 
 of study prescribed for Public Schools, require instruction to be given in 
 reading, grammar and ocmposition to such pupils as are directed by their 
 parents or guardians to study either of these langaages, and in all such cases 
 the authorized text-books in French or German sbaO be used. 
 
 A 
 
22 
 
 FBENCH SCHOOLS. 
 
 (2) Tt Rhall be the diily of the te»cher to conduct every eteroiM and reoiU. 
 tion from the text books yirusuribed for Tublii; iSchouls, in the Kugliih 
 language, and all ooinmnnioations between teacher and pupil in regsrd to 
 matten of discipline and in the management of the school ahxll be iii Eng- 
 lish, except »<) far as this is iinpracticttble by reason of the pupil not under* 
 standing English. Recitations in ; French or GermaTt may be conducted in 
 the language of the text book. 
 
 (3) It shall be tho duty of the Intpeolor to examine carefully in English 
 every j "pil accoiding to the cotirse of stud'es prescribed for Publi« ScKodIs ; 
 but lie stiall be at liberty to use his own discreiiun m to what explanations 
 he will give in any other language that appears to be better known by the 
 
 gupil. Tho standard of efliciency rooognia»d in Public Schools where the 
 Inglish language only is taught shall be the standard for French and Ger- 
 man schools, reasonable allowance being made for pupils whose mother tongue 
 is French or German. Tho Inspector shall report at once to the Education 
 Department any scliool in which the regulations respecting the study and 
 use of English are disregarded by the te&cher or trustees. 
 
 (4) In C(juuticB where ihore is a soiircity of teachers qualified to toach Eng- 
 lish, the Board of Examiners for the county, with the approval of the Edu- 
 cation Department, may establish a Model School for the special training of 
 French or German teachers. S\ich schoojs sliall hold two sessions each year, 
 and shall, in addition t'tthe ordinary professional course required for County 
 Model Schools, give a full literary course in Eugliah in all the subjects pre- 
 scribed for Third Class Teachers' Certihcates, or for District Certiticates, as 
 the Board may direct. The final examination for certifi-ates to teach, shall 
 be conducted in the English language. There shall also be a final examin- 
 ation in the French or German language, in reading, grammar and composi- 
 tion. Boards of Examiners shall possess all the powers with respect to such 
 schools as they now possess with respect to County Model Schools. The 
 Regulations governing the inspection of County Model Schools by the 
 County and Depirtmental Inspector shall apply to these schools. 
 
 (6) Emblems of a denominational character shall not be exhibited in a 
 public school during regular school hours. 
 
 vy 
 
1