<fS. 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 ^O 
 
 ^ *<?^ 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 ;iii 
 
 !il! 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 ■U IL^ 12.2 
 
 Hf ua mil 2-0 
 
 I. 
 
 U III 1.6 
 
 ^^ 
 
 %. 
 
 w 
 
 /: 
 
 
 V 
 
 /A 
 
 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions 
 
 Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 
 
 1980 
 
Technical Notes / Notes techniques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Physical 
 features of this copy which may alter any of the 
 images in the reproduction are checked below. 
 
 L'institut a microfiimt le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Certains 
 difauts susceptibles de nuire A la quality de la 
 reproduction sont notte ci-dessous. 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couvertures de couleur 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured pages/ 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 n 
 
 Coloured plates/ 
 Planchec en couleur 
 
 D 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages dAcoiordes. tachetdes ou piqutes 
 
 n 
 
 SMow through/ 
 Transparence 
 
 D 
 
 Tight binding (may cause Shadows or 
 distortion along interior margin)/ 
 Reliure serr6 (peut causer de I'ombre ou 
 de la distortion le long de la marge 
 intirieurek 
 
 D 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 r^ Additional comments/ 
 
 Commentaires suppidmentaires 
 
 Original copy restored and laminated. 
 
 Bibliographic Notes / Notes bibliographiques 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Relid avec d'autres documents 
 
 
 Pagination incorrect/ 
 Erreurs de pagination 
 
 Pages missing/ 
 Des pages manquent 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 Plates missing/ 
 
 Des planches manquent 
 
 D 
 
 Maps missing/ 
 
 Des cartes giogsaphiques manquent 
 
 n 
 
 Additional comments/ 
 Commentaires supplAmentaires 
 
The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and iegibiiity 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Las images suivantes ont 4t6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition at 
 de la nettet* de I'exemplaire film*, et en 
 conformity avec las conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall 
 contain the symbol —»>( meaning CONTINUED"), 
 or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever 
 applies. 
 
 Un dee symboles suivants apparaTtra sur la der- 
 niire image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: 
 le symbols — »► signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbols 
 V signifie "FIN". 
 
 The original copy was borrowed from, and 
 filmed with, the kind consent of the following 
 institution: 
 
 National Library of Canada 
 
 L'exemplaire film* fut reproduit grAce it la 
 g*n6rosit6 de i'^tabiissement prAteur 
 suivant : 
 
 BibliothAque nationals du Canada 
 
 l\^aps or plates too large to be entirely included 
 in one exposure are filmed beginning in the 
 upper left hand corner, left to right and top to 
 bottom, as many frames as required. The 
 following diagrams illustrate the method: 
 
 Les cartes ou les planches trop grandes pour dtre 
 reproduites en un seul clich* sont fiim6es d 
 partir de I'angle supArieure gauche, de gauche A 
 droite et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images nAcessaire. Le diagramme suivant 
 illustre la mAthode : 
 
 1 2 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
il 
 
 
 Changes of Level of the Great Lakes. 
 
 By G. K. GILBE^IT. 
 
 Reprinted from the new review, The Forumjj^Q^^ 5 Jurf 1388 
 
 ^^\ 
 
** 
 
 \v 
 
CHANGES OF LEVEL OF THE GREAT LAKEa 
 
 The following pages are devoted to the physical history of 
 the lakes of the northern States. As avenues of commerce, as 
 preserves of food fishes, as reservoirs of pAre water, as resorts 
 for the artist, the pleasure seek'er, and the health seeker, their 
 description is left to other pens. They are here treated only as 
 physical features, the endeavor being to set forth their origin and 
 the series of physical changes, past, present, and future, that 
 constitute their history. 
 
 Rivers are the mortal enemies of lakes. The river that flows 
 into a lake brings st<jnes and sand and fine mud, and dropping 
 these into the quiet water endeavors to fill the earth cup that 
 holds it The year's tribute of sediment may have as little 
 apparent effect as the year's tribute of water, which quietly 
 escapes to atmosphere and ocean ; but the river is long of life and 
 steadfast of purpose, and if years and centuries prove too short, 
 it resolutely persists through geologic ages. The river that 
 flows away from a lake constantly deepens its channel of escape, 
 and thus attacks the lake's rampart at its weakest point If 
 the rampart is of loose earth, this is roiled and floated away bit 
 by bit, and the work goes on merrily ; if it is of firm rock, this 
 is dissolved, and then the process is exceedingly slow. But time 
 is long, and even by solution the rampart ma\^ be channeled to 
 its base and the whole lake drained away. 
 
 Nevertheless, in spite of this warfare of extermination, waged 
 in all lands and through all time, there continue to be lakes, and 
 so there must be in nature lake-producing as well as lake-destroy- 
 ing agencies. There are indeed many such, but a few only need 
 V)e appealed to to explain the great majority of lakes, and the 
 chief are upheaval and glaciation. 
 
 , Some parts of the earth's surface are known to be rising and 
 others to be sinking. Usually such changes are of impercepti- 
 
418 
 
 CHANGES OF l.EVKL OK TIIK GREAT LAKES. 
 
 ble slo\vn<v*s, but ocoaaionally there is u sudden movement of a 
 few feet, involving rupture of rocks and an earthquake Similar 
 movements luive abounded tlirough past ages of the eartli, and 
 to them are due not only mountains and piateaus, but eontinenta 
 and ocean beds. This great natural process of uplift and down- 
 throw tends to produce lake basins, and, as we have seen, its 
 tendency is opposed by the great natural })rocess of erosion and 
 deposition by rivers. The two are so nearly balanced that the 
 scale is thrown to one side or the other by the accident of climate. 
 Where much rain falls the rivers are powerful and prevail, 
 sawing gorges through ridges as fast as they rise, building up 
 the floors of valleys as fast as they sink. Where little rain falls 
 the streams are weak, and the displacement of the earth's crust 
 shapes the land into lake basins. Where the least rain falls the 
 basins are many, but the lakes are ephemeral, created by the 
 storm and dissipated by the sunshine. Great Salt Lake, Utah 
 and Humboldt Lakes, and a score of others in our arid belt lie in 
 valleys shaped by crustal displacement 
 
 A glacier is aptly called a river of ice. Like a river of water 
 it has an upper surface sloping continuously from source to goal, 
 and like a river of water it rests on an uneven bed of its own 
 shaping. When an aqueous river is suddenly deprived of its 
 supply of water, there remain along its channel a series of pools 
 recording the inequalities of erosion. When a great glacier is 
 melted away the inequalities of its erosion are recorded in a chain 
 of lakes. Moreover, much of the .naterial ground and torn by 
 the glacier from its bed is carried forward in the ice and dropped 
 in a long heap where the ice melts, constituting a moraine. If 
 the final melting is gradual, a series of moraines partitions the 
 valley, creating lake basins. While it is building a moraine, 
 the ice front advances and retreats in response to small changes 
 in climate, so that the dropping of detritus is irregular, and the 
 surface of the moraine is made billowy, abounding in small lake 
 basins. Thus from glacial erosion there arise rock-basin lakes, 
 and from glacial deposition of detritus there arise moraine- 
 dammed lakes and moraine lakes. 
 
 In that wonderful geologic winter known as the Age of Ice, 
 the annual snowfall on the northern part of our continent was 
 
CHANGES OF I.EVKL OF THE GREAT LAKES. 
 
 419 
 
 HO groat and the annual melting was bo small that the snow 
 accumulated year by year, and became cemented into a continu- 
 ous, deep, and over-growing sheet of ice. As the depth of the 
 sheet increased the Pressure of its own weight became finally 
 insupportable, and there was relief by horizontal flow, the mar- 
 gin moving outward to a region of warmer climate, where it was 
 molted. It was, in fact, a vast glacier, so vast that the figure of 
 .speech emlxxlied in the title " river of ice " becomes here inapt 
 Instead of flowing from a mountain down a sloping valley, it 
 flowed radially from a central plateau of ice, with little regard 
 for the slopes of the land over which it passed. We do not yet 
 know the center of dispersion, but the ice entered our land as 
 an invader from Canada. The border States from Maine to 
 Minnesota were overrun, and most of the land north of the Ohio 
 and Missouri Rivers. Twice the van was pushed far into the 
 domain of the sun, and twice it was compelled to retreat ; but 
 when the sun finally surveyed its reconquered territory, the land 
 was no longer simply graven with a tracery of rivers ; it sparkled 
 with the sheen of innumerable lakes. 
 
 Wherever the ice moved it swc^pt forward the soil and all 
 other loose material, and with them scoured the firm rock be- 
 neath, producing a polished surface of peculiar character, with 
 many scratches and furrows parallel to the direction of motion. 
 In some regions it did little more than this, but elsewhere it was 
 a powerful agent of erosion, scooping out great hollows from the 
 solid rock. For some reason not clearly understood the erosion 
 was greatest along a zone parallel to the margin and a few hun- 
 dred miles back from it, and here were formed the basins not 
 only of the Laurentian lakes from Ontario to Superior, but 
 of Winnipeg, Athabasca, Great Slave, and Great Bear Lakea 
 Within this zone of greater erosion the points of greatest erosion 
 were determined chiefly by the pre-glacial shape of the surface. 
 Where the land was high the overriding ice sheet was relatively 
 thin, its motion correspondingly slow, its pressure slight, and its 
 erosion unimportant Where the land was low the deeper ice 
 stream flowed faster, pressed harder on its bed, and eroded rap- 
 idly. How deep the original valleys were cannot be told, for 
 the details of the old toj)ography have been ground away, but 
 28 
 
 u 
 
4*^0 
 
 CHAMGKS OP LEVEL OP TUE (IKEAT LAKES. 
 
 •we may be sure that they were shallow ns compared to the exist- 
 ing troughs. The deptlis of Lake^ Michigan, Superior, un«l 
 Ontario reach from three hundred to five huiidre<l feet below the 
 level of the ocean, and their origin cannot be referred to stream 
 erosion alone without incredible assumptions as to continental 
 elevation. 
 
 Between the Great Lakes and over the country south of them 
 are spread moraines and other deposits of ice-transported debris. 
 They vary gre^itly in coni[)<)sition, structure, and topographic 
 form, but have this in common, that their material differs in 
 kind from the solid rock immediately beneath it, having been 
 brought from more northerly points. Collectively they are called 
 the Drift, and they dominate the s\irface, ofteti concealing the 
 rock for scores of miloi. The typical morainic drift has a hum- 
 mocky surface, abounding in small lake basins called '-kettles;" 
 other varieties undulate more gently, and harbor broader but 
 shallow lakes; and elsewhere the surface is smooth and com- 
 pletely drained. Over large districts, especially north of the 
 Great Lakes, the drift is scant and irregularly spread upon an 
 uneven rock surface, and there lakes are especially abundant 
 Many of them lie in rock basins, but the most are partly con- 
 tained by walls of drift. 
 
 The Great Lakes, with the possible exception of Erie, all 
 occupy rock basins, that is to say, they lie in hollows having 
 continuous rims of solid rock ; but these rims are in places coped 
 by accumulations of drift in such way as to increase the depths 
 and areas of the lakes and control to some extent the direction 
 of their outflow. It is probable that the surplus waters of Supe- 
 rior and Ontario escape over the lowest points of their rocky 
 rims, but if the drift were removed at the south end of Michigan 
 the lake would find a lower outlet and become tributary to the 
 Mississippi. The removal of drift between Huron and Erie 
 would probably render them confluent, as Huron and Michigan 
 now are. The removal of drift between Erie and Ontario would 
 greatly reduce the upper lake, or possibly drain it completely, 
 and would make it tributary to the lower at Hamilton, Canada, 
 instead of at Fort Niagara. 
 
 As soon as the ice was gone running water began a work of 
 
^fm 
 
 CHANGES OP LEVEL OP THE QKEAT LAKES. 
 
 421 
 
 reclamation, waHhing the earth from the steeper slopes down into 
 the lakelets, and cutting down their otitlets until they became 
 so shallow that vegetati»)n could take up the work and liil them 
 to the top with peat, llalf of the moraine lakes have been thus 
 converte<l into marshes, and throtigh extensive districts in Ohio, 
 Indiana, and Illinois only the marshes, and the deposits of peat 
 and marl where marshes have been drained, remain to show how 
 numerous were the lakes. The <lrift-dainmed lakes are better 
 preserved, partly because in. their region there is less loose debris 
 •with which t<i till them, partly because their outflow is often 
 across resistant rock. Of progress toward the destruction of the 
 Great Lakes there will bo occasion to speak in another connec- 
 tion. 
 
 But the story of the lakes is not completely told by explain- 
 ing the origin of their basins; there is also a history of their 
 development as water bo<li£». During the period of greatest 
 ice expansion the hydrographic basin of the Great Lakes and 
 the valley of the St Lawrence were not merely ^'led but over- 
 passed, so that the rivers generated on the glacier in summer fell 
 from its southern edge beyond the rim of the Great- Lake basin, 
 and flowed to the Missouri, the Mississippi, the Ohio, the Sus- 
 quehanna, and the Delaware. As encroaching heat gradually 
 reduced the limits of the ice, its retreating margin reached and 
 passed the basin rim at various j)oints, and there accumulated 
 between the water parting and the ice wall a series of glacial 
 lakes, fed by the melting ice and discharging southward across 
 the passes of the great divide. The precise order of events has 
 not been made out, but there was a time when the western part 
 of the Superior basin contained a lake discharging to the Missis- 
 sippi River by way of the St. Croix, there was a time when 
 the southern part of the Michigan basin held a lake discharging 
 to the Mississippi by way of the Des Plaines and the Illinois, and 
 there was a time when a lake, occupying the western half of the 
 Erie basin and covering the Maumee valley, overflowed at Fort 
 "Wayne to the Wabash Hiver, and thus sent its water to the 
 Ohio. At a later stage a single sheet of water covered the south- 
 ern yjart of the Huron basin and all the Erie, and encroached 
 slightly on the Ontario. Then the ice retreated from all the 
 
422 
 
 cuANuES OP lkve;;. of the great lakes. 
 
 Ontario basin, hut rernaimHl in tlie vallev of the St. Lawrence, 
 pressing against the Adironihiek u])lau(lH. By this retreat Erie 
 and Ontario were ditFerentiated, and the Niagara Uiver came 
 into existence^; hut, as wo sliall stn;, tlie map was far from a.><8Uin- 
 ing its present aspect. The; water of ()iil;iriu, liaviiig no eseape 
 by way of tlie St. Lawrence valley, sought the lowest pass 
 south of tlie Adirondacks, finding it wl jre tlui engineers of the 
 Erie Canal afterward found it, and overflowing at Jtome to the 
 Mohawk Jiiver. This discharge was maintained for a long 
 period, giving the waves time to construct massive beaches and 
 carve broad terraces which still endure. They have been traced 
 all about the basin, except, of course, on the northeast, where 
 the waves broke vainly on an unre(;ording wall of ice. The 
 " Kidge Road" from Lewiston to Sod us follows the crest of one 
 of these beaches; a railway from Richland to Watertown has 
 found easy grades along the base of another. 
 
 It is impossible, witjiin the limits of a magazine article, to 
 assemble or even cite the documents on which this historical 
 sketch is founded ; but it may be stated, in brief, that they con- 
 sist of deserted shore lines, deserted river channels, muddy lake 
 sediments enveloping bowlders dropped from icebergs, and old 
 stream valleys flooded by encroaching lakes. One of the most 
 important bodies of evidence is educed by measuring the height 
 of the same shore line at different points. Originally the shores 
 were horizontal, of course, each at its own level, but they are not 
 so now. They rise t<)ward the north, and, less rapidly, toward 
 the east ; and we learn thereby that when they were made the 
 face of the land had a different attitude, being lower at the north 
 and east, as though depressed by the weight of the ice. 
 
 ^t the epoch of the separation of Erie and Ontario the north- 
 ward tilting of the land exceeded three hundred feet in the length 
 of Ontario, and amounted to half as much in the length of Erie. 
 The northeastern end of Erie being fixed in height, as it still is," 
 by the outlet at Buffalo, the plane of its level surface cut the 
 western slopes of the basin at a lower point, and the lake was 
 smaller. It was, indeed, only one-third as long as now, and its 
 water surface but one-fifth as great The sites of Toledo and 
 Cleveland were far inland, and the Bass Islands were smooth 
 
COANGES OP LEVEL OP THE GREAT LAKES. 
 
 42'i 
 
 liilla in the Mauinee valley. Finally the bk)cka(le w&a raised, in 
 the St Lawn.Mice valley, the outlet of Ontario wa.s shifted from 
 Home to the Thousand Islands, and it<^ water level was drawn 
 down five hundred feet During the Home epoch of its hintory 
 Ontario's area was 60 per eent greater than now ; it began the 
 Thousand-Island epoch with an area 30 per cent smaller than 
 now. 
 
 While yet the glacier was present and the navy of Ontario 
 was a fleet of icebergs, the depressed land at the north had begun 
 to rise again. When the glacier was quite gone the reflux was 
 rapid, the land s(>on reached a more stable position, and the 
 lakes iicquired their present dimensions. Had the oscillation 
 receive<l no check, our hydrography &iu[ avenues of commerce 
 might have been very different; a further tilting of the land to 
 the extent of three inches in each mile would send a great river 
 from Chicago to the Mississippi, reverse the current in the 
 Detroit, stop Niagara Falls, anu rob the upper St Lawrence of 
 seven-eighths of its water. 
 
 Has the oscillation ceased? Is Niagara destined to run dry? 
 These are questions hard to answer for the remote future into 
 which science fain would peer, but less difficult as concerns 
 those few generations of posterity to which our ambitions and 
 sympathies extend. It is one of the inducti'^ns of geology that 
 absolute stability is a myth, and all j)arts of the earth's crust 
 continually undergo changes of level. There is no reason to 
 believe that the lake district is an exception to this law, but 
 whatever movements may be there in progress are so slow that 
 the}' have not been detected, and their tendency is unknown. 
 In our use of the lake harbors we have observed no changes 
 requiring earth movements for their explanation, and this nega- 
 tive testimony, so far as it goes, shows present stability. That 
 which the waves have done to the present coasts, in the cutting 
 back of cliffs and the building of spits, is a work of many centu- 
 ries, during which the water level must have remained nearly 
 constant; and the practical stability thus shown for the imme- 
 diate past is a guarantee for the immediate future. 
 
 There is no question that changes of other kinds are in prog- 
 ress Storm waves and storm currents are eating away the coasts 
 
-rMnm^vrmrtmm 
 
 434 
 
 CHANGES OP LEVEL OP THE GREAT LAKES. 
 
 and spreading the fine debris over the lake bottoms, where it 
 mingles with the muddy tribute brought by flooded rivers ; the 
 St Clair River is feebly scouring its channel and building ita 
 delta; the Falls of Niagara are gnawing back toward Lake Erie 
 at the rate of four or five hundred feet in a century ; and with 
 infinite slowness the Ste. Marie, Detroit, and St. Lawrence Rivers 
 are deepening their rocky beds. In a future geologic age all 
 the lakes that survive the erosion of outlets will have succumbed 
 to filling by alluvial mud, and the reign of running water will 
 once more be established. 
 
 But the lake basins are' so capacious that we become aware 
 of their slow filling only by observing the discoloration of the 
 water in times of freshet and of storm. The scour of the St. ' 
 Clair can do ro more than reduce the level of Lake Huron to 
 that of Lake St. Clair, a difference of two or three feet; and as 
 the reduction proceeds, its rate, now exceedingly slow, must con- 
 tinually diminish. If the recession of Niagara Falls were to 
 continue at its present rate. Lake Erie would be tapped in two 
 hundred centuries ; but the rate is determined by the geologic 
 stnicture, and that structure changes between Goat Island and 
 Buffalo in such a way as to retard the work of erosion. 
 
 All these processes are too slow to affect our hopes or fears 
 concerning the immediate future, and for our posterity in the 
 year 20,000 we have no solicitude. The men who shall watch 
 the draining of Lake Erie — or who, perchance, shall find it 
 worth their while to prevent it — wiU as far surpass us in powers 
 and resources as we surpass the men who watched the lake's 
 creation. For all practical purposes our inland seas are perma- 
 nent and their basins stable. The only modifications that affect 
 our economy are those wrought by the waves upon their coasts. 
 
 Nevertheless, their stability is sometimes called in question. 
 Their levels are not absolutely constant, but oscillate under 
 various influences about a mean position, and when they are 
 unusually low the "oldest inhabitant " is interviewed, and is 
 reported to declare that the like was never seen before. Then . 
 some theory of permanent change is promulgated and the sensa- 
 tion has its day. While yet the newspaper discussion of the 
 recent lowering of water levels is fresh in memory it will not be 
 
CHANGES OF LEVEL OP THE GREAT LAKES. 
 
 425 
 
 amiss to recite briefly the conditions on which such changes 
 depend. 
 
 About each of the lakes is a district of land draining toward 
 it. A portion of the rain and snow falling upon this land is 
 returned to the atmosphere by evaporation from the soil, and a 
 larger portion is returned by evaporation from the surfaces of 
 plants. The remainder flows to the lake and tends to raise its 
 level. Its level is also raised by the rain and snow falling upon 
 it. On the other hand, its level is lowered by evaporation, and is 
 lowered by the discharge through the outflowing river. In the 
 long run the supply from inflow and rain is balarced by the loss 
 through evaporation and outflow, and so in a general way the 
 lake altitude is constant; but in detail it is inconstant, oscillating 
 about its average position. 
 
 The additions to the lake by rain are not uniform through the 
 year, but are usually greater in summer. The additions from 
 tributary streams are still less uniform, being smallest in winter, 
 when precipitation takes the form of snow, and largest in spring, 
 while the snows are melting. The loss from evaporation is like- 
 wise unequal, varying with the temperatures of air and water, 
 with the dryness of the air, and with the velocity of the wind, 
 and being usually greatest in summer and autumn. Thus supply 
 and loss are not balanced in detail; at somy seasons there is a 
 net gain and the lake surface rises, at others there is a net loss 
 and it falls, and the rise and fall together constitute an annual 
 oscillation. 
 
 A second difference depends on the variation of weather from 
 year to year. In some years more rain and snow fall, in others 
 less, and there is a similar fluctuation in the atmospheric con- 
 ditions affecting evaporation. When the rainfall is greater than 
 usual or the evaporation less, the lake rises ; when the rainfall is 
 small or the evaporation great, the lake falls. A succession of 
 wet years produces exceptionally high water, a succession of dry 
 years extremely low water. But there is a limit to such cumu- 
 lative effects, for when the lake is high its outflow is more rapid 
 than when it is low, and an automatic check is thus furnished. 
 
 Thirty years ago Colonel Charles Whittlesey compiled all 
 available data regarding the fluctuations of the lakes, and was 
 
426 
 
 CHANGES OP LEVEL OF THE GREAT LAKES. 
 
 able to publish an account of the more important changes of the 
 lower lakes between the years 1838 and 1857, together with a 
 few data concerning exceptional phenomena in earlier years. In 
 1859 the United States engineers began systematic gauge-read- 
 ings, and their work is still continued. The following table is 
 based on their records, and shows the ordinary range of fluc- 
 tuations. Michigan and Huron are here treated as one lake 
 because their waters communicate freely through a strait. 
 
 Lake. 
 
 Superior 
 
 Michigan-Huron. 
 
 Erie 
 
 Ontario 
 
 Peri<Ml 
 
 of 
 record. 
 
 Usual date of 
 
 highest 
 Btage. 
 
 1871-87 lAugust. 
 
 1860-87 July or Aug. Jan. or Feb.j 1.2 
 
 lowest 
 stage. 
 
 April. 
 
 Mean 
 annual 
 range. 
 (Feet.) 
 
 1.3 
 
 June or July. 
 June. 
 
 l.« 
 1.8 
 
 Extreme range 
 
 for 
 
 whole period. 
 
 (Feet.) 
 
 3.0 
 3.9 
 3.5 
 
 4.7 
 
 ii ♦ 
 
 The highest water known occurred in 1838, when Michigan- 
 Huron rose 26 inches above ordinary high stage, and Erie and 
 Ontario 18 inches. The lowest water known was in 1819, when 
 Erie fell about 3|- feet below its usual plane. 
 
 The present low water is the sequel of last summer's drouth. 
 The Signal-Service records indicated that the lake region received 
 in the year 1887 only about 26 inches of rainfall instead of its 
 usual quota of 33 inches. If the evaporation and the discharge 
 remained constant, the lakes should fall 7 inches by reason of the 
 defect of aqueous precipitation on their surfaces, and about as 
 much more by reason of the 'defect of inflow ; but, taking tlie 
 average for all the lakes, the actual fall from the low stage of 
 1887 to the low stage of 1888 has been only 7 inches. The 
 variation of rainfall was, therefore, great enough to account for 
 the variation of lake surface. That it was more than sufficient 
 is probably explained by the coolness of the autumn, which 
 tended to diminish evaporation. In Superior the low water of 
 last February reached 5 inches below the level of the average 
 low stage, a depression exceeded but twice in seventeen years. 
 
«>«n»yy«iill ■ii ll.n^l i 
 
 jil'^^n 
 
 "m * y' 
 
 CHANGES OF LEVEL OF THE GREAT LAKES. 
 
 427 
 
 In 1879 and 1880 the wa'er was 3 inches lower. In Ontario, the 
 lake most affected, the low water of 1888 was 6 inches below the 
 average, but this record has been exceeded six times in the last 
 twenty-eight years. 1868 marks 10 inches below, 1872 16 inches, 
 1873 14 inches, 1875 (February) 13 inches, 1875 (December) 7 
 inches, and 1881 11 inches. In Michigan-Huron the recent low 
 water was but 2 inches below the average, and in Erie but one 
 inch. If our inland commerce has need to be assured of the 
 continued fidelity of its " unsubsidized ally," it can find comfort 
 in the contemplation of these figures. 
 
 The oscillations described affect an entire lake uniformly. 
 There are others that affect its parts differently, the water rising 
 ."n one place while falling in another. The most powerful cause 
 of such displacement of level is the wind, which, driving the sur- 
 face water before it, heaps it up against the lee shore ; and the 
 greatest effects are seen in Erie, whose shallowness interferes 
 with the adjustment of levels by means of a return current 
 beneath. A gale blowing in the direction of the lake's length 
 has been known to raise the level seven or eight, feet at one end 
 and depress it an equal amount at the other. 
 
 Oscillations of a second kind are caused by inequalities and 
 variations of atmospheric pressure. When the air presses un- 
 equally on different parts of a lake an equilibrium is reached by 
 a depression of the water surface under the heavier column and 
 its elevation under the lighter. If the air pressures are ra{)- 
 idly shifted, as in the case of thunder-storms and tornadoes, 
 rhythmic undulations are produced analogous to those from the 
 dropping of a pebble in still water, and traveling like them to 
 remote shores. The rhythmic period is usually measured in 
 minutes and the height of the undulation in inches, but waves 
 of this class sometimes equal the largest* generated by wind. 
 The passage over Lake Michigan of a broad wave of barometric 
 change sets the water to swaying from side to side as we some- 
 times see it in a hand basin ; but the greater body has a longer 
 period, advancing and receding only eleven times in twenty-four 
 hours. 
 
 Third and last are the tides, which ebb and flow in lunar and 
 solar cycles as regularly here as on the ocean, but are unheeded 
 
428 
 
 CHANGES OP LEVEL OP '^HE GREAT LAKES. 
 
 by the navigator. The highest determined spring tide rises 
 about 3 inches, and the average height of tide on the shores of 
 the larger lakes is probably not more than one inch. 
 
 And so these lakes of ours, that seem to ordinary observation 
 as enduring as the earth and yet as fickle as the weather, are to 
 the trained imagination of science both ephemeral and constant 
 l^ie geologisi, looks l)ackwar(l to the time when they were not, 
 and forward to the time when they will no longer be ; talks of 
 their birth, growth, decline, and death, and, comparing their 
 span of life with the *^arth's, declares them evanescent The 
 physical geographer, analyzing the motions of the water, refers 
 them to the attractions of celestial bodies, the pressures of air, 
 the friction of winds, the varying dryness of the atmosphere, 
 and the varying rain, and assigning each fluctuation to its appro- 
 priate cause, lays V)are a fundamental constancy to which the 
 navigator and the statesman may safely pin their faith. 
 
 G. K. Gilbert. 
 
THB FORUM. 
 
 The New Review. 
 
 THE FORUM addri ses itself to the mass of intelligent people. 
 
 It discusses subjects, that concern all classes alike — iu morals, in education, in 
 government, in religion. 
 
 It is genuinely independent, both of partisan bias and counting-room influence. 
 
 It is constructive in its aim, presenting opposing views not for the purpose of 
 exciting strife, but in order to assist the reader to form wise conclusions. 
 
 It employs the best-known essayists ; and it also invites to its pages men and 
 women connected with im])ortant business and social interests who have special 
 opportunities for information. 
 
 A FEW OF ITS CONTRIBUTORS 
 
 President Julius H. Seelye. 
 Prof. John Tyudall. 
 Bishop F. D. Huntington. 
 Justice Thomua M. Cooiey. 
 PrcHldent S. C. Uartlett. 
 I'rof. John Stuart Blacliie, 
 Canon Wilberforce. 
 President F. A. P. Barnard. 
 Edward Everett Hale. 
 Prof, firaile de Laveleys. 
 Gen. Lord Wolseley. 
 Bishop J. L. Spalding. 
 Prejiident Timothy Dwlffht. 
 Prof. William T. Harris. 
 Chancellor Howard Crosby. 
 Monsifrnor T. S. Preston. 
 Prof. Alexander Winchell. 
 President J(j^n Boecom. 
 Prof. J. Peter Lesley. 
 Bishop A. Cleveland Coxe. 
 Prof. St. George Mivart. 
 President E. G. Uobinson. 
 Prof. Frederic H. Hedge. 
 Andrew D. White. 
 President F. L. Pattou. 
 Chancellor J. H. Vincent. 
 James Parton. 
 President James B. Angell. 
 Prof. C. C. Everett. 
 Judge Edward A. Thomas. 
 Prof. A. P. Peabody. 
 Dr. C. E. Brown-S6quard. 
 
 Lord Bramwell. 
 
 Judge William D. Kelley. 
 
 David Dudley Field. 
 
 Thomas Hardy. 
 
 Prof. William G. Sumner. 
 
 Major J. W. Powell. 
 
 President Francif \. Walker. 
 
 Prof. Lester F. A\ ard. 
 
 John G. Carlisle. 
 
 Rev. Dr. R. Heber Newton. 
 
 Prof. C. A. Young. 
 
 Edwai-d Eggleston. 
 
 Rev. M. J. Savage. 
 
 Judge Robert C. Pitman. 
 
 T. W. Higginson. 
 
 Prof. Richard T. Ely. 
 
 Elizabeth Cady Stanton. 
 
 W.S.' Lilly. 
 
 Rev. Dr. Cyrus Hamlin. 
 
 Park Benjamin. 
 
 Prof. Simon Newcomb. 
 
 Monoure D. Conway. 
 
 Prof. Theodore Gill. 
 
 Andrew Lang. 
 
 Prof. H. H. Boyesen. 
 
 Elizabeth Stuart Phelps. 
 
 Dr. Austin Flint. 
 
 Rev. Dr. Washington Gladden. 
 
 Julia Ward Howe. 
 
 Prof. David Swing. 
 
 Rev. Dr. Leonard W. Bacon. 
 
 Eliza Lynn Linton. 
 
 Bishop Richard Ollmour. 
 Senator J. J. Ingalls. 
 Richard A. Proctor. 
 Prof. Henry C. Adams. 
 W. H. Mallock. 
 The Duke of Marlborough. 
 Prof. N. 8. Shaler. 
 President J. R. Kendrick. 
 Prof. Newman Smyth. 
 Carroll D. Wright. 
 George Ticknor Curtis. 
 Dr. Cyrus Edson. 
 Senator Henry Ii. Dawes. 
 Prof. Noah K. Davis. 
 Gen. A. W. Greely. 
 Rev. Dr. C. A. Bartol. 
 Andrew Carnegie. 
 Senator Shelby M. CuUom. 
 Prof. R. H. Thurston. 
 Dr. William A. Hammond. 
 Woods Pasha. 
 Rev. Dr. C. H. Parkhurst. 
 O. B. Frothingham. 
 Grant Allen. 
 Rev. Dr. J. M. Buckley. 
 Richard H. Dana. 
 Judge E. H. Bennett. 
 Prof. Thomas Davidson. 
 D. M. Craik (Miss Mulock). 
 Prof. G. J. Romanes. 
 Dr. Edward C. Spitzka. 
 Gov. J. B. Foraker. 
 
 Published monthly. 50 cts. a copy. $5.00 a year. 
 
 THE FORUM PUBLISHING CO., 97 Fifth Ave., New York. 
 
 \