CIHM Microfiche Series ({Monographs) ICMH Collection de microfiches (monographies) Canadian Inttituta for Historical Mwroroproductiont / Inttitut Canadian da microraproductioni historiquas % Technical and Bibliographic Notes / Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the t>est original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming are checked below. ^ Coloured covers / Couverture de couleur □ Covers damaged / Couverture endommagde □ Covers restored and/or laminated / Couverture restaur^e et/ou pellicula I Cover title missing / Le titre de couverture manque I Coloured maps / Cartes g^ographiques en couleur r^ Coloured plates and/or illustrations / < — I Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur I I Bound with other material / Coloured inic (i.e. other than blue or black) / Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) D D D Reli6 avec d'autres documents Only edition available / Seule Edition disponible Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin / La reliure serrte peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsion le long de la marge int^rieure. Blank leaves added during restorattons may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming / II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont pas M filmtes. m Addittonal comments / Commentaires suppl^mentaires: Varfoin paglngs. ▼I»la IAa^ Im fill ■ J aA lh« ■■ Jur ** ■ ■ ■ - -. - -»- » ■ *- - ■ - i I IMC mm IS ninMa si ms fsouciion rsiio cnsoicsQ dsisw / C« do c umsn t sst nmi su taua ds rMuetien indiqut c i dssssus. L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exempjaire qu'il lui a 6X6 possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exem- plaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du point de vue bibli- ographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modifk^ation dans la m^tho- de normale de filmage sont indk^u^s ci-dessous. I I Coloured pages / Pages de couleur I I Pages damaged / Pages endommagtes D Pages restored and/or laminated / Pages restaur^es et/ou pellicultes Pages discoloured, stained or foxed / Pages dteolor^s, tachet^s ou piques I I Pages detached / Pages d^tachdes I •[ Showthrough / Transparence I I Quality of print varies / D D D Qualitd indgale de I'impression Includes supplementary material / Comprend du materiel suppldmentaire Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image / Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, etc., ont 6X6 filmdes i nouveau de fa^on d obtenir la meilleure image possible. Opposing pages with varying colouration or discok)uratk>ns are filmed twk:e to ensure the best possible image / Les pages s'opposant ayant des colorations variables ou des decolorations sont filmtes deux fois afin d'obtenir la meilleure image possible. lOx 14x tiR 22x 2ex aoR J ' 12x ISx 20x 24x 2tx 32x Th« copy filmed h«r« hM bMn raproducad thanks to tha ganarosity of: National Library of Canada L'axamplaira filmi fut raproduit grica A la ginirositA da: Bibliotheque nationale du Canada Tha imagaa appaaring hara ara tha bast quaiity pessibia eonsidaring tha condition and lagibiiity of tha original copy and in kaaping with tha filming eon' ^*ct apacif Icationa. Las Images suivantas ent itt roproduitas avec te plus grand soin, compto tsnu de la condition st de la nattete da rexemplaira filmi, st sn conformity avec lea conditions du contrat da filmaga. Original copies in printed paper covers ara filmed beginning with the from cover and ending on the iaat page with a printed or illuatratad imprea- sion. or the back cover when eppropriata. All other original copiea ara filmed beginning on the first pege with a primed or illustrated impree- sion. and ending on the Iaat page with a printed or illuatrated impression. The Iaat recorded frame on each microfiche shell contain the symbol ^ (meening "CON- TINUED"!, or the symbol ▼ (meaning "END"), whichever appliaa. Maps, plataa. charts, etc.. may be filmed at different reduction retios. Those too large to be entirely included in one expoaure ara filmed beginning in the upper left hend comer, left to right and top to bonom, as many frames aa required. The following diagrams Illustrate the method: Lea axemplairaa originaux dont la couvarture sn papier est imprimee som filmis en commancant par la premier plat at an tarminant soit par la darnlAre page qui eomporta une empreinta d'imprassion ou d'illustration. soit par la second plat, salon la cas. Tous las autrcs exemplairas origineux sent fllmto sn commencant par la premiere page qui comporte une empreinta d'Impreesion ou d'illustration at an tarminant par la damlAre page qui comporte une telle empreinte. Un dea symbolaa suivants spparaltra sur la derni*re imege de cheque microficha. salon la cas: la symbols -^> signifis "A SUIVRE". Is symbole ▼ signifie "FIN". Lee cartes, plenches. tableeux. etc.. peuvent itre fllmte A dea uux de rMuctlon diffirents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour *tra reproduit en un soul cliche, il est film* A partir da I'angle supArieur geuche. de gauche * droite, et de haut an baa. an prenant le nombre d'Images nteessaire. Lea diagrammea suivants lllustrent la mOthoda. 1 2 3 4 8 6 MtOOCOPr MSOWTION TBT CHART (ANSI and ISO TEST '"HART No. 2) 1.0 I.I tn L25 i 1.4 U£ . 1^ Ih ^ yo t& il.6 ^ /APPLIED IM/GE Inc 1653 East Mom Str««t RochMt«r. Htm Vort 1*609 USA <716) 462 -0300-Phon. ( 6) 266 - 5969 - Fob , Z33'7 6 S 3 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e A. 1916 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WATER POWER BRANCH J. B. CHALLIES, Superintendent. WATER RESOURCES PAPER No. 2 REPORT ON Bow River Power AND Storage Investigations SEASONS 1911-12-13 BY M. C. HENDRY, B.A.Sc. I'lrimred under the direction «/ the Superintemlml of Wntrr-fuurrx fui\ri:n by ohoeh of i- ahu.wkst. OTTAWA ntisrm \\\ j, dk i. tach£. printku to i iik kim; .-< must KX( KLLKNT MAJK8TY 1914 'irn. MM 5.1 00H38S:^1 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 28* A. tQ18 To Field Marshal His Royal Highness Prince Arthur William Patrick Albert, Duke of Connaught and of Stratheam, K.G., K.T., K.P., etc., etc., etc.. Governor General and Commander in Chief of the Dominion of Canada. May It Please Your Royal Highness: The undersigned has the honour to lay before Your Royal Highnena a report of the Bow River Power and Storage Investigations. Respectfully submitted, Ottawa, May 22, 1914. W. J. ROCHE, Minister of the Interior. 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26« A. 1916 Department of the Interior, Ottawa, May 22; 1914. The Honourable W. J. Roche, M.D., Minister of the Interior. SiE, — I have the honour to submit a report of the Bow River Power and Storage Investigations and to recommend that it be published as Water Resources Paper No. 2 of the Dominion Water Power Branch. I have the honour to be, sir. Your obedient servant. W. W. CORY, Deputy Minister of the Interior. vn 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e A. 1915 Water Power Branch, Ottawa, August 29, 1914. W. W. Cory, Esc, C.M.G., Deputy Minister of the Interior. Sir: — Conservation of the waters of the Bow River is of the utmost moment f r upon it directly depends the agricultural and industrial prosperity of a very large area of southern Alberta. Rising in the high and remote regions of the Rocky Moimtains National Park, and, with its many tributaries, furnishing the most interesting and attractive feature of this world-famed scenic park, it emerges from the park only to be harnessed to supply energ>' for transmission many miles away to the City of Calgary for municipal purposes, street lighting, tramways, and for general commercial and industrial use. After furnishing this hyd velectric energy, the same waters have, by irrigation, converted thousands of acres of otherwise useless land into the most fertile and fruitful tracts within the Province. At "first blush" it would appear that the two important uses of this water for irrigation, and for power, would result in serious conflict of interest. For- tunately the irrigation requirements occur during high water stages of the river, and storage on its upper waters would make it i)ossible to conserve enough of the flood flow, not required for irrigation, to equalize the low flow during the winter months that may be necessary for power purposes. The present use and distribution, and the future conservation, of the water resources of the Bow river basin, constitute one of the most important problems before the Depart- ment of the Interior. In some of its phases this problem has already been solved, while in others it av.'aits solution, although a beginning has been made, and the lines of practicable progress have been fairly well marked out. Realizing the importance of the Bow river waters to every phase of the development of the district through which it flows, and of the utmost necessity of having a practicable conservation scheme worked out and put into pra,. oe without delay, the Dominion Water Power Branch has made a thorough investi- gation of the water resources of the Bow River basin above Calgary. These investigations have been carried on to completion with all reasonable thorough- ness and every possible despatch under the immediate direction of Mr. M. C. Hendry, B.A. Sc, who has acted throughout with the continuous advice and assistance of Mr. C. H. Mitchell of the Consulting Engineering firm of C. H. and P. H. Mitchell, Toronto. They have been surprisingly gratifying, showing that it is economically feasible to so regulate the flow of the Bow River, by means of storage works in its upper waters, as to warrant the developn'ent at six power sites of over 45,000 continuous 24-hour W.H. P., all within 50 miles of the City of Calgary. At the same time it has been shown, that the using of these waters for power purposes r'^ove Calgary need not conflict with the consumption of the same water be', v. Calgary for irrigation purposes; rather would the regu- lation proposed for power purposes be a distinct advantage to the extension of existing irrigation systems to their ultimate capacity, and also insure in the future the instigation of additional irrigation projects. Owing to the importance of Mr. Hendry's investigations, and of their direct bearing on the industrial development of central Alberta, I would reconime'id that they be published for general distribution as "Water Resources Paper No. 2" of the Dominion Water Power Branch. Mr. Hendry's report is submitted for this purpose. Respectfully submitted, J. B. CH ALLIES, Superintendent, Dominion Water P(>wer Branch. S QEORQE V. SESSIONAL PAPER Na 2Se A. 1915 Ottawa, May 22, 1914. J. B. Challies, Esq., Superintendent Dominion Water Power Branch, Department of the Interior, Ottawa. SiB, — I beg to submit herewith the manuscript of a report on Power and Storage Investigations on the Bow River west of Calgary. In submitting this report I wish to acknowledge the loyal and efficient assistance of Mr. C. H. Attwood, Mr. K. H. Smith, and other members of my staff in collecting and arranging data for this report. I have the honour to be, sir, Your obedient servant, M. C. HENDRY, Chief Engineer. 6 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 28e A. -SIS CONTENTS. I. ScMMARY or Investiqations. Introduction— Departmental Policy— Necessity of Investigation*— Organization and Scope — Meterirs Stations • ■ • , • ■ ', w RemimCs of Work— KeconnaiaBanc*— Surveys— Results of Survey^ ^lesults of Storage Investigations Estimates of Cost • • • • •.••••■ ;• ■ ■ •■..■:■■ Similar Investigations— Ontario— New Voric State— State of Mame— State of >\ ashington -^Hher Examples Recommendations Acknowledgements M. Bow UlVER. Bow River— General— Fall— Drainage Area— Discharge— Topographical Features— Uiver Divisions : Power Section ■ ■ Storage Section— Lakes of — Streams of — Underflow III. In. 1».\UE 1 3 *> Ice — Sheet Ice — Fruzil Ice— Anchor Ice Winter Conditions— .\s Affecting Plant Operation. IV. 10 II II 1(5 18 Meteoboi.ocical Phenomena. Rainfall— General— R.'lation of Precipitation to Altitude— Value of Record.s— -Vccuriicy of Records— Di.-tribution of Rainfall- -Uelat ion of Precii)itation to Run-off— Division of the Vear-'j;eini>erature— Influence upon Evaporation— Influence upon Discharge... V. Run-off. R'.m- llulow C»liiai\ KffiTt of StoraKc on I'owi-r ()ut|mt. General- XII. Irrioation. -Relation of Power and Irrigation Requirementa. I'Adf 134 Ml It: Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Index . . . . Plans.. Maps. . I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. APPENDICES. Letter from C. II. Mit-^li"!!, C.K., ConsuItinK Engimni Report by G. R. G. Conway, C.E Report ')y G. L. Albert Report by Mr. Shutt. Dominion Chemist Report on Geology of District by Charles Water-Power Regulations Run-off Data Precipitation Data Temperature Data Evaporation Data . . Camwll, IVSc, I'll I ) III |>OI l.'il 1.57 Iti.'i 171 175 IHJt iy« ■«J7 :, 1912, to March 6, 1913 Diagram shewing mean monthlv discharge of Elbow River at Calgarv from May. 1908. to December, 1912 Diagram shewing mean monthly discharge of the Sprav River at Banff from July, 1910, to I>+emb«-r 1912 Diagram shewing grouting and insj)ecticess of filling the basin and providing for a constant discharge of 200 sec-feet Hydrograph of mean monthly flow of Lake Miimcwanka Sloragr- froin January. 191 1, to .\ugust, 1912, showing conililions lni|H)s<>d by a con- stant run-off of 1.50 sec-feel Ttiagrani shewing condltiim of filling and emptying Spray Lake Reser- voir 10 27 27 :{2 3S 70 70 NO H2 H2 90 Diagram shewing discharge in a<'rc-feet of Bow Rivir at llorsesh<«' Falls from May, 1909, to February, 191:1. also the iffiH'i of .>', 1909, to Fehruar>', 1913, showing conditions under a con- tinuous flow of L500 w -f Wt ..,,,, Diagram shewing discharge in acre-feet of KIbow River Storage fnun .■\pril, 1910, to DecenilxT, 1912, also the pri«>ess of filling basin and providing for a constant discharge of 200 sec -feet 140 140 DEPARTMEST OF TBE IJiTERtOR No. Plate XIX Plate XX Hate XXI Plate XXII PUte XXIII Plate XXIV No. DIAGRAMS— (^'onhn ued. 5 GEORGE v.. A. 1915 To Kack Paqe. Diagram shewing discharge in acre-feet of Bow River from January, 1910, to December, 1912, below Calgary also the record of filling storage basins and water wasted under a continuous flow of 1,850 cubio-feet per second . . , 140 Power-percentage of Time Curve of the Bow River at Horsenhoe falls and Kananaskis falls for period May, 1909, to April, 1912 140 Power-percentage of Time Curve of the Bow River at Bow Fort Power Site for period May, 1909, to April, 1912 140 Power'i)ercentage of lime Curve of the Bow River at Mission Power Site for period May, 1909, to April, 1912 146 Power-percentage of Time Curve of the Bow River at Ghost Power Site for period May, 1909, to April, 1912 146 Power-percentage of Time (Uirve of the Bow River at Itadnor Power Site for period May. 1909, ti. April, 1912 146 TABLES. 1. Metering Stations 2. Storage Basins 3. Power Sites 4. Power Output of Bow River fi. Summary of Effect of Storage in Bow I{ivcr Biisjn 6. Storage Developments 7. Power Developments 8. Plants on the Deerfield River, Mass., r.S..\ 9. Discharging Capacity of Kananaskis Dam 10. Rates as charged by City of Calgary for Power _ 11. Lake MinnewanVa Storage, R«'cord of Flow and Storage with 1.50 see-feet drnw off Capacity 44,700 acre-feet 12. Lake Minnewanka Storage, Rin-ord of Flow anil Stf)raKe with I.tO sec. -feet draw off Capacity ,58,900 acre-feet 13. Lake Minnewanka Storage, Record of Flow and .Storage with 200 sec. -feet draw off Capacity 58.900 acre-feet 14. Kananaskis Storage with 140 sec.-fwt flow 15. Kananaskis Storage with 130 wc.-fe»>t flow 16. Hesults of Auxiliary Kananaskis Storage (HO seti-fi^'t ) 17. Uesults of Auxiliary- Kananaskis Storage ( 130 see-feet i 18. Capacities of Storage Basins 19. Cost of Storage Basins 20. Cost of Storage Basins in I'.S.A 21. Results of Storage 1909-1910 22. Kesults of Storage 1910-1911 23. Results of Storage 1911-1912 24. .\uxillary Storage at Power Sites MAPS AND PLANS. Paoe 3 3 4 4 5 6 6 8 41 43 S2 83 120 120 121 121 134 134 13A 137 138 130 143 Contour Man of Bow River Basin above Calgar>- In pocket Kev Map of llow River basin above Calgar>' • Oeologi<'al and Topographical map of the M(M)se Mountain Region of the "Disturbed ^^ Bell." .Southern Alberta, bv D. nCairiK-s '^ Route Map between Calgary and Banff . , j. Structure section across the Rockv Mountains near the main line of the Canadian I'acitic Railway, between CaseiMie Trough and the Cohiiiiltiaii \ aUe> PUn No I Kananaskis Falls Topographic .She<>l " l.\ (Jeneral Plan and Development. Kananaskis Falls " J Horseshoe Falls Topographic .Sheet . BOW RIVER POWER A?ID STORAGE »s SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26e MAPS AND PLKSS— Continued. PLANS — Continued. Plan No. 2A. Details Calgarv Power Company's Plant, Horseshoe Pallf 2B. Details Calgaiy Power Company's Plant, HorBeshoe tails 3. Upper Bow Fort Topographic Sheet 4. Bow Fort Site Topographie Sheet , a- " 4A. Plan of Proposed Development at Bow Fort Site •' 5. Topographic Sheet No. 5 6 " " " 6 7'. 7 8. Morley Bridge Topographic Sheet 9. Mission Site Topographic Sheet 9.\. Plan of Proposed Development Mission Site - 10. "Topographic Sheet No. 10 11. Topographic Sheet " 11 12. Ghost Site Topographic Sheet 12A.Pt*n of Proposed Development Ohost Site 13. Radnor Site Topopaphic Sheet ■ " 13A.PIan of Proposed Development at Radnor Site 14. Topographic Sheet No. 14 16. Ghost River Topographic Sheet '• 16. Bow Lake Topographic Sheet 17. Plan and P' ails of Minnewanka Dam 18. Cascade River Power Site Topographic Sheet ISA.Outlet Minnewanka Storage Topographic Sheet 9. Spray Lake Ba-nin Topographic Sheet D In iKX'ki'l J - .. .. " " E 21; " " " " F. 22. " " " " G 23' " " " " H 24. " « " " 1 25. Kllmw River Development Topn/i'';V'"^i- ^^J ^•*' and part of 14, township 22, range 6. During the seasons of 1911-12, a topo- graphical survey was made of about 30 miles of the Bow nver from the C anadian Pac-ific Railway bridge above Kananaskis falls down, particular attention being given to the several power sites. Also topographical surveys were made of Bow lake, lake Minnewanka and the basin of the Spray lakes, with a view to the creation of storage. Resilts of Surveys. The results of these surveys are summarized in the following tables 2 and 3: - Storag" '^.asins— Table No. 2. liiiMM. > (■iip»''ity. ,, , I 27,4flOiiiT<-fi'et. How l?iKe -- 1-1 000 Spmyluke '^^•■.go .. „T«aieil/. Lake Mmnewanka li 'ijin auxiliary olq mn Tcitjil alMivi. ( ttlaary on How river i--'m witli auxiliary "iii'iinn ,liK>w river ... ■ .7u>i ini " TiitalalM)V.(algary, inelu'lingauxili.iry at Minnewanka -XU..IUIJ BEPARTMEyr OF THE INTERIOR Power Sites- 5 GEORGE v.. A. 1915 -Table No. 3. Site. _ .. . Pondage above Dam, in acres. Head in feet. Bow riter— I. Kananaskis falls 122-25 98-47 205-19 353-09 786-10 241 50 70 (building). 70 (operating). 66 47 50 44 215 2. Horseshoe tails 3. BowKoit 4. Mission 5. Ghost 6. Radnor Cascade river — At Minnewanka Dam Elbow riter — Canyon development _ Results of Storage Investigatio.w. The effect of storage on the river can best be noted at two points, one of which may be taken as at the Calgary Power Company's plant, at the Horseshoe falls, and the other below the mouth of the Elbow river. At the former site, the effect of all the storage on the Bow above Calgary is noted; and at the second, the effect of the storage on the Bow and Elbow combined. The mean flow for the low-water months, as recorded at Horseshoe falls, has been found to be a.s low as 745 c.f .s. ; by means of the storage that has been, and may still be created, it is anticipated that this can be raised to at least 1,500 second-feet. Below the mouth of the Ghost, this would be increased to 1,600 c.f.s. At Cal- gary, below the mouth of the Elbow, the storage on that stream becomes effective and it is expected that a flow approaching 2,000 c.f.s. may be obtained. ' The effect of storage upon the power output of the river over that due to the natural flow, may be seen by a glance at the following tables, Nos. 4 and 5:— Power O'jtput op Bow River— Table No. 4. Power site. N'atuml Klow (-"ntinuous Wheel H.-P. 1. KanuDJiskiEi falls 2. Hor-eshoc falls 3. liow Fort 4. Mission 5. Ghiwt 6. Itjiflnor Total. ReKulated Flow rontinuous Wl 1 H.-P 3,820 9,545 3,820 9,545 3.800 9,000 2,S&5 6,410 3,780 7,27.5 2,800 6,400 19,785 48,175 Giving an increased continuous output of 28,390 wheel horse-power. Ite BOW RI\ER POWER AND STORAQB SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26* o a. H H B. C3 H > H a a ■< a H B. O >J u > u O z o a. ^ S3 o r. » a » z o H o K e 1 s s r* § 3 r» I I- s ! s •i * OC r- ^-^ o > 7: 1 in 1 I 6 S e B I? I 5 s g ■3 5|l w ^ i Si f- " '- r. S !C ! i- j o I -' I i i g h? i ■3 5 3 5 ' 5 1 £ DKPAltTltKNT OF TBK 1NT> S GEORGE v.. A. 191S Cascade River. — Minnewanka dam. 1,165 wheel horse-power. Elbow River. — Canyon site 3,900 " " SUHUARY. In table No. 5, a summarj- is shown of the effects of storage upon the developed and undeveloped water-powers within the power-producing portions of the Bow river:* (Nnri —This table is compiled from diagnmn on plates Noa. 20. 21, 22, 23, and 24, and ihows the effect ol storage upon the river (or different aHnumptions. On plate \o. 7 U a profile of the power sec- tion of the rive-. It shows the relation of the head and taiUwatem of the diffen-nt plants Ui one another.) Estimates of C^gst. Estimates of cost have been prepared that provide for the complete develop- ment of the three storage basins, including one already bi"'t - four additional power plants and new duplicate transmission lines sufficient to carry the totai output from the four plants, together with adequate receiving equipment at Calgary. While these estimates are preliminary only, and are for *he purposes of obtaining a comparison of costs and of arriving at the commercial possibilities of the project as a whole, they have been conservatively computed and it is thought they iu\, ample to cover all contingencies based upon present day labour and market conditions. These are summarized in tables Nos. 6 and 7. Storage Development.^ — Table No. 6. Site. Bow lake. . . Spray lake. . . Minnewanka. Elbow river (with auxiliary). Capacity Acre-feet. Estimated Cost. < 'o»t per .AorMoot. 1 t 1 t cts 27,400 i 105,000 1 3-83 171,000 : 514,000 2-98 44,700 ! 145,000 3-24 58,900 i 14.5,000 2-46 23,000 j 200,000 8-70 Power Developments. — Table No. 7. Site. Head in feet. Bow fort ... gg Mission 47 Ghost 50 Radnor 44 'Fjitimated cost of power per k.w.hr. E»timater basis. cost includinjE 1 of storiiKe. storage, tnjn^jmission lines, etc. t Cts. 9,000 924,970 0-49 6,410 851,100 O'OO 7,275 892,500 0-57 6,400 807,460 0-59 Note— With reference to till- fiTrriioing it may be of interest to note that in April, 1913, a cuiupre- hen!.ive report was made for the City of CalRary , wherein it was shown that I'lectric power generated bv a :'teaiii coal-fired plant and sold on a basis of a 50% load '■ t.<)r, would cost, delive-ed at generator terminals without transformation or transmission, from O-S.'i .nt down to 0-74 cent per k.w. hour as the sise of the plant increased from 5,000 k.w. to 45,000 k.w. i-apa< ity. BOW RITEK POWER AND 8T0RA0E 7 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26« SIMILAR INVESTIGATIONS. Precedents are not wantinK f..r work of the description carried ""^ by the Water Power Branch, either in Canada or in foreign countnes. The most extenaiN^k of this kind in Canada has »-een carried on by the Hydro-Llectnc Commission of Ontario. In the United States 8 mdar work has heen done by sevVral o the states in conjunction with the United States Geologual Survey; Song thosS that should be mentioned, in ''hich work along the hnes of wat.r^ power investigation have been carried on are: The states of New \ ork, Mame, Minnesota and Washington. Ontario. In Ontario, the Hydro-Electric Commission has investigated a large num- ber of possible water-powers in various parts of the province and reported upon hen ^^or a number of these, estimates of the cost of development were made in some detail, and are to be found in the reports issued by thenri at yanous "There is a difference, however, between the object of the mvestigaUon made bv the commission and the investigatu.ns here presented; the former were carried on with ihe object of ascertaining what could be done in the way of power production by the commission, whereas the investigations carried on bvTe Wafer Power Branch have been with the ob ect o supplying informa- tion to the public on the subject, and procuring information upon which the best administration of the water-powers could be based. New York State. The work of the New York State Conservation Commission, which super- sedes that formerly carried on by the Water Supply Commission, is rather wider n1ts scope tLn that of the Water Power JBranch. The work earned on b the Water Supplv Commission is now under the Division of Inland Waters (f the New York State Conservation Commission; this work is outlined in cheir reports as follows:— 1. Water storage and conservation for power purposes. 2. Hydraulic development. 3. River improvement. 4. Drainage. rt. Water supply and sewerage. 6 Inspection and supervision of hydraulic structures. It will be seen from the above that the work is very similar in many ways to that of the Water Power Branch in Canada, \\ith rogarcl to the different lites investigated by them, preliminary plans an.l estimates have been pre- pared as has been done in this report. State of Maine. The state of Maine Water Storage Commission was established in 190i» under the laws of the state, and consolidated with the state Survey ( ommissiou in 1911. An extract from section 5 of the Act reads as follows:-- "The commission shall also report. ..; ' , °" V present development of the water-powers in the state, with rf "emf to the general plan proposed, so that the legislature may have before it a comprehensive suinnmry of the pos.sibilities that he m the development of the water-powers in the state us a natural resource, and the necessarv steps that should be taken by the state to further increase and conserve them." DSPAKTMEKT Of TBE IVTESIOR .... » QEORQE v.. A. 1»1S oUhe princlp.1 »jw'.r produ^H .hf™. e J ;ith the St Sj2 State of Washington. Other PvXamples. t,,..;C';^;?KXidt'?Hvt\"s.?sr^^^^^^^^ «. SXK - E Cite ^ss^.S';«Xs4 v;'-,fe"c Plants on the Deerfield River, Mass., U.S.A.-Table Plant. I -■VvcruKP Xi)inial ! not Hater i neau. !*oo.-ft. Scott'a Hri*» "»« «i5 "S The Bow river has its head-waters on the main continental divide and flows m a general south-easterly direction, roughly paralleling the summit of the mountain ranges for the first hundred miles of its course. On acUn^"f this thl mam stream and many of its tributaries have their sources at high altitudes md are, to a very great extent, glacier fed. (See reproduction pages 1 and 12 ) Fall. .t,k-i ^I?.A'n^ head-waters to Kananaskis falls, at the confluence of the Kauan- askis and Bow rivers, a distance of about 90 miles, the fall is about 2750 fc.'t f K ^''^^^^'J^'^ ^^^^ tp * ''1K"'-.v, at the junction with the Elbow river a distance "f about 55 miles, the drop is 720 feet. DKAIXACiE AkEA. The drainage area of the Bow river above Calgary is 3,138 square miles exclusive of the area drained by the Elbow river. Of V.;:. area, 17 snua^^^^ niiles he above Kana.mskis falls an.l may be considere.l as lying en ti el • wi"h a the moun ams. The remaining 1,428 square miles are in the fL-hiUs.and tl^ section extends as far east as Calgary. DiSCHAKUE. fl„„ The discharge of the Bow river varies greatly from season to season The How during the high-water period, which occurs during the summer months vinlor'Z?M*'"'%^'"'' "V*'" °^-^'^*" 1^"°^' *»'«' '^"" "«<-""i"K duS the winter months. I he great variation is the main drawback to economical tK.wer development on the river. jniwrr Records of the (lischarge of the river at various points have been kept more or ess con inuously since 1909 Fro.n these a diagram has been drawn (see Plate tt» ^•'','i'."l'' '*''"''■•' "'^ f»"^*-harge of the river as recorded at Banff, Horseshoe tails and ( algary. TOPOGRAPIIUAL KkaTI:KK(4. From Mow lake, the source of the river, down to Laggan, the river flows for ow, and the flats themselves are m many places very swainpv, so much so that in an> hut very dry seasons, it is necessary to keep to the hiitli itround aloii>r the shoulder of the mountains when traversing the valley *^ Below Laggan, as far a.s Kananaskis falls, the val'lev traver-Hnl is wUU- flat low and drv 7n.Srn ''*"';, ''"' I'"""- '■■•^»'t"ous in its course, the banks being low and dry. In two or hree places in the main valley alnive Banff small lakes occur, probably formed by the dammiug off of part of the old river Tmrs, »!? 11 ear kes ins to nU Hh an- ide nd ht, >»• ike on- to in he ke, the ow nr. ver tM me itit «t, an, ict In the er- Mre ter M, ft, ice to tun oni PLATE 1 Vf RIVER 13000 1000 '^s§§s^-^ m ii 2li ljf|j|liJll|g|i|^ • H 412 ' IlllJl^jglili mt K 4 descril forms of Call T] in a I mount main a are, to Pi askis 8 From ] of abo' Tl exclusi miles 1 the mo section Tl flow di being i winter develoi Ri or less < No. I.) falls iiB Fr the nio; low, an in finy ahouldi B« and CO* low an( occur, ] BOW RIVER POWER AKD STORAGE 11 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e mateiial carried down from the surrounding mountains. Below Banff, near Exshaw, the river widens out and covers the greater part of the valley. At Kananaskis falls an abrupt change in the topography of the country takes place; this, it may be said, is due to the fact that the river leaves the mountains proper here, and flows out into the foot-hills. These conditions may be said to continue as far as Calgary. Divisions of the River. For purposes of description, the part of the river lying above Calgary will be divided into two parts, exclusive of the Elbow river, which will be df .It with separately. The upper part of the river lying above Kananaskis falls will b« referred to as the storage section of the river, while that part lying below Kanan- askis falls and as far down as the city of Calgary will be referred to as the power- producing section. Power Section of the River. From Kananaskis falls nearly to Calgary, the river flows through <:. wide valley for long stretches; the river proper is confined, however, to its channel by steep banks that at diff'erent points are rockv cliffs of considerable height, running as high as from 100 to 150 feet. Generally these cut banks have long sloping banks opposite to them, but in places the river channel is canyon-like for short stretches, lending itself to power development and hence the desig- nation. This topography is generally typical of the river, from Kananaskis falls to < "algary. Storage Section of the River. The storage section of the river, a stretch of approxiniatdv ./O miles in length, lies to the west of Kananaskis falls, and entirely in the mountains. The Bow river rises at an altitude of 6,860 feet above mean sea-level; Bow hike, which is practically its source, lies at an altitude of 6,420 feet, and offers the first and highest site for storage in the Bow basin. About 12 miles below Bow lake, Hector lake, which is at an elevation of 5,700 feet, empties into the Bow. (See reproduction page 14.). From Hector lake to a point ne- r Laggan, a distance of 15 miles, the river falls about 650 feet, or about 43 feet per mile. About 2 miles above Laggan, it is joined by Bath creek from the west, and just below Laggan, bv the Pipestone creek from the north. Between the outlet of Hector lake and Bath creek, a number of small streams join the Bow, but on account of the smallness of their discharge during cold weather, they are not worthy of notice. Between Laggan and Banff, a distance of 35 miles, the river falls 540 feet, approximately 16 feet per mile. The river valley is very wide in this section, the banks of the river low and the stream swift-flowing; there are no distinct drops, what is practically a continual swift exists between the two points. In this stretch the volume of the river is augmented on the south side by the waters of the Chalet creek, the outflow of Moraine lake, and the waters of Ver- milion, Redearth, and Brewster creeks; there are also many others, which are too small for notice as they have no discharge during the low water or winter season. On the north side there are several creeks of importance— Pipestone, Baker, Johnson, and Fortymile being the largest. All of these creeks are short, and rise at considerable elevations; those entering from the south side commence on the main divide, and have their source, for the most part, in the glaciers to be founu along the summit of the mountair range. (See reproduction page 12.) The creeks entering from the north are longer, and their slopes are not so steep, although their sourres are at considerable elevations, ranging from I I 12 DBPARTME\T OF THE I\TERIOR 5 GEORGE v.. A. 1915 7,500 to over 8,000 feet above mean sea-leve!. These streams are not fed bv daciers o the same extent a8;.hose entering from the south, but derive the rflowmostlv thTrdU ^"-^''i^^•°°^^•^'''*'"« '"^l*^^ during the Lt summer months^ Crow Foot Glacier. Photo by M. C. Hondry. Bow Glaripr. Photo by M. C. Hpndry. BOH' RIVE: i'OMEli .IVO STORAGE 13 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25o From Banff to Kaniinaskis falls the nature of the topography is not materi- ally changed, except that the mountains are generally lower, the valley is wider and the river more meandering. Between these two points the fall is 380 feet in a distance of 30 miles, about 13 feet per mile, and some of this occurs as a direct fall at the fJpray falls in Banff, at the beginning of the section. Three streams of importance add their waters to those of the Bow in this stretch of river: the Spray, entering from the south at Banff, just below the Spray falls; the Cas- cade, which also forms the outlet of lake Minnewanka, enters from the north, about 4 miles below the mouth of the Spray; the Kananaskis, joining the main stream from the south, just above the falls of the same name. The important streams contributing their waters to the Bow river will l)e dealt with in greater detail in another part of the rejK)rt, merely their location relative to the main river being given here. Lakes of the Storage Sectiov. ^ Nearly all the streams flowing into the Bow river have, at or near their source, a lake of greater or less size. Those belonging to the first class arc Bow and Hector lakes, already mentioned; lake Minnewanka, Spray lakes ami Kan- anaskis lakes, the last two forming part of the water system of the same name. Amongst the other lakes belonging to this basin that might be mentioned is lake Louise, its outlet is Chalet creek; this lake is famed for its beauty the world over. Then there are Ptarmigan and Baker lakes at the head-waters of Baker creek, also Redoubt lake oa the same stream; Moraine lake, another lake of great beauty in the valley of the Ten Peaks, which empties into the Bow by way of a steeam of the same name; Boom lake, at the head of Wrmilion creek, and Shadowjake forming one of the sources of Redcarth creek. These lakes tthtgrhe termed storage basins, and have the effect of regulating, tnilry. BOH' KIVKR POWER A\D 8T0RA0E 15 SESSIONAL PAPCR No. 25e During the hinh-water period the umiertiow is rehitively small, but during the low-water period, which corresponds to the winter weaHon, the underflow may be expected to form a very large proportion of the discbarge, and in the smaller streams there is no doubt that at times it forms the total flow. This underflow has a very considerable effect upon the results of gaugings made in the streams, causing results to be obtained which do not truly represent con- ditio s. I 20E--3J 16 DEPARTMK\r Of Tin: ISTKIlUm 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 CHAPTER III. ICE. One of the problems which confront.^ the eiiKineer in the (iesipn of u water- power development in Canada is the method to be adopted for eliniinafinf? or minimizing the effect of ice upon plant operation and power production. The effect of the ice upon the present plants in operation upon the Bow river is not a direct one; so far no great trouble has been experienced in operating the plant due to ice blocking the water entrances, nevertheless the presence of ice in the river has a marked effect upon the power production, and it cannot be overlooked in the study of any future development. Before looking into the effect of ice upon the operation of a plant, it will be well to examine the formation of the ice itself, and bv this means aim at a possible method of dealing with the question. There are three kinds of ice which, owing to their effect upon th<' operation of water-power plants, are of interest to the engineer; these arc. -board or sheet ice, " ice and anchor ice. .Sheet Ice. Sheet ice is that kind of ice which is formed upon the surface of lakes, smooth-flowing rivers, ponds, etc. The process of formation is an interesting one, and begins with the arrival of ct ' \ weather. As the season advances, the water on the surface gives up its L -a" > surface radiation, convection currents are set up, the cold surface water falls and the warmer water below rises; this in turn gives up its heat; by a continuation of this process, the temiwrature of the whole body of water is gradually lowered until it reaches 39° F.; at that temperature convection ceases, and the water on the surface is cooled down until freezing point, 32° F., is reached. The first indication of the fornuition of ice is the presence of long needle-shaped crystals on the surface, these rapidly increase in number and size until finally the whole surface is covered; this surface layer becomes more compact, and the ice increases in thickness, as the underlying water gives up its heat by conduction through the ice; the rate of growth diminishes, however, as the thickness of the sheet increases. When the ice sheet is once formed, radiation to a very great extent ceases; this is due to the fact that the ice is seldom clear, and is generallv snow covered and the heat rays are unable to penetrate under such conditions; if the ice was clear and solid, the heat rays could then penetrate, and the loss of heat from the water below would go on at a .uuch more rapid rate, and consequently the growth of ice would be more rapid. The presence of any sheet ice in a river immediately above a power plant has a beneficial effect upon its operation rather than the reverse; the reason for this will be understood after the subject of frazil and anchor ice has been dealt with. Frazil Ice. Frazil ice, known also as "slush ice," is perhaps the ice formation which has the most serious effects upon water-power operations. It is always formed in the open channels where the current is too swift or turbulent to allow the formation of sheet ice, and its formation is dependent upc ilisturbance or BOW mvr.R POWER as storage 17 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e iiKitution, I'oiisequently swift turbulent streiiins are ^ ■• prolific in its pro- duction; it occurs in needles, the fineness of which are due to the iiniount of nKitation; in such places as rapids, and at the foot of fails, these needles are very fine, hut they increase in size and thickness where the flow is less rapid and disturbed. Frazil ice is always surface formed, but the ice crystals rapidly become distributed throuifhout the whole body of water; this gives rise to the saying that the water is "thick." This condition occurs only durinji a period of extreme cold, combined with great surface agitation, due to rapids in the river, or wind; the direction of the wind relative to the flow of the river has a varying effect on protluction of frazil, a wind blowing upstream produces more frazil than one blowing downstream, on account of increased surface agitation. The conditions that make for the greatest production of frazil ice are a dull stormy day, with wind up.stream; a great amount of frazil nuvy be pro- duced upon a clear cold night with wind, but on a clear cold day with wind there is not so great a quantity formed, due to the absorption of heat from the sun's rays at the water surface. Professor H. T. Barnes, in his book on "Ice Formation" says that: (') "A stretch of open water makj's a very much greater quantity of ice in the form of frazil crystals than could be produced as a surface sheet, if the water were sufficiently quiet to allow such to grow." It is this production of frazil which gives rise to so much trouble, the stream becoming l>locked with the mass. Where an ice sheet exists, c(mditions are ofteti aggravated, the frazil blocking the waterway underneath, at times luusing complete stoppage of flow. Anchor Ice. Anchor ice, "ground ice," the German name "Grundeis" and the French- ("anathan term "moutonne' ' are among the many names given to this particular form of ice. As this list of names would indicate, it has attracted very wide- spread attention, and a number of scientists have published papers iii which its formation has been discussed. The name "anchor ice" perhaps best describes it, and is the one by which it is most widely known in this country. The peculiar feature which gives it this name is the fact that it is foriiied upon the bottom of the rivers or streams. Many theories as to the reason of the formation of ice upon the bottom have been advanced. That as set forth in a paper by Rev. Dr. Farquharson, which he published in 1835 and 1S41, and quoted by Dr. Barnes in his work= is generally accepted as the correct one. He attributes the formation of anchor ice to the radiation of heat from the surface of the stream's bed. It is remarked that this cooling by radiation, and consequent formation of anchor ice, occurs only in streanis whose beds are composed of gravel, stones and boulders, but not in clay or mud-bottomed streams; also that the formation of the ice is greatest on the rocks and stones of dark colour. The formation of anchor ice is most rapid during a clear, cold night i londi- tions which are favourable to rapid radiation). On a clear, cold day, the sun's rays affect the formation; in fact, it is universally noted that on the api)earance of the sun in the morning, the ice becomes loosened from the botton and rises to the surface; its appearance when floating has given rise to the French- Canadian terni; "moutonne," on account of its resemblance to the l)acks of white sheep. It has been noted in connection with anchor ice, that its formation does nt)t occur under cover; a liridge of the current, does not apjjear in the deeper water until zero weather sets in." In this repf)rt the formation of anchor ice is not ascribed to radiation from the nver bottom, but rather to the cooling of its surface through the contact with the frazil-charged water. Pniceeding with the description on anchor ice, the report says: — "On the approach of mild weather, it becomes detached from the bottom, sometimes bringing up with it gravel and stones, and may be seen as a dark-coloured mass bursting up all over the surface with con- siderable force, and with a his.sing sound, which ri;^es a foot or more above the surface, but, falling back, shows only a few inches floating above it. Out of the portion above the surface, the water quicklv drains, and it becomes white as snow." This is the appearance giving rise to tlie term "moutonne" mentioned before. In respect to the name "anchor ice" being applied to frazil ice, this is due. in the case of water-power developments, to the action of the frazil under certain conditions. \\ here the head-race of a development is open, allowing the frazil direct acce.xs to the intake without having to pass under an ice sheet, it practically becomes anchor ice, because as it comes in contact with the racks and intake structure it adheres to them and rapidly cuts off the water; under these con- ditions there is no difference between anchor and frazil ice, once the latter has become attached to the structures. As a matter of fact, it is this action of the frazil which causes the trouble directly to plant operations, as it is generally formed m the greatest quantity. The action of the anchor ice proper is to cut off the flow of water in the stream bed; when the anchor ic. is floating the conditions are improving. Winter Conditions. One condition which requires attention in a study of this kind is the effect of ice upon the discharge of the river, for the formation of frazil and anchor ice '" the bed of these rivers and streams has a very marked influence upon their (i) Panes IIO-III "Ii-f Koriiiatinn," by Prof. H. T. Barne». now ifivrit row Iff \\n srni.nit: SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se 19 I s 3 20 OEPARTMi:\ r Of THE IS'fERIOK 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 li.T ('nii--C'aM'Hd(> Rivrr. Photo l.y M. C H-ntlry. BOW RIVICR POWER AND STOHAGK 21 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e discharge. Lying, as they do, at considerable elevations, the temperature obtaining during the winter months is low and, owing to the steep slope of the streams, their flow is turbulent, thus the necessary conditions are present for the formation of frazil ice. The conditions for the formation of anchor ice are also good, for in many places the stream is too swift to allow an ice sheet to be formed; the water is clear and generally shallow, the nights are cloudless and cold; in consequence anchor ice is formed in great quantities. The formation of frazil and anchor ice in the mountain streams causes their discharge to be very fluctuating, and accentuates the variation in flow during the low-water period. Winter Conditions as ' KPECTiNti Plant Operation. The successful operation of a wait-r plant in winter, on the rivers of ( 'anada, depends in a large measure on the method of providing for or eliminating!: the ice troubles which are always to be met with. In the foregoing, the conditions favourable to the formation of the several kinds of ice to be met with have been explained, also the relation of oiu' kind of ice encountered, to another. Of the three principal kinds, sheet or board ice is the least detrimental to operation; in fact if board ice were the only kind to be dealt with, the trouble would be negligible. Where the channels are small, however, and where anchor and frazil have been formed above, great trouble may be experienced, due to the lodging of this frazil and loosened anchor ice, under the sheet, for frazil ice, in the presence of sheet ice, attaches itself to the under side of the latter, and where the channels are small, the whole flow of the stream may become blocked, overflow will then occur ami a great proportion of the stream flow be lost. ( Keproductions pages 1!>, 20, 24 and 2.'>, illustrate the.se conditions.) One of the be.st methods, however, of avoiding frazil and anchor ice trouble-i, is by obtaining a iwnd of suflficient .size and depth in the immediate vicinity and above the intake of the plant, which will readily freeze over; the ice sheet obtained will, to a great extent, eliminate any troubles with frazil or anchor ice. If the entrance to the power plant is a channel restricted in size, the ice sheet will be a hindrance, rather than a benefit, if there is open water above. In such a case it is much better to be without a sheet of ice, and instead make provision for handling the accumulation of frnzil and anchor ice in the head works. There have been many attempts made to deal with this problem, liui it generally degenerates into a brute force combat. In many plants provision is made for passing masses of frazil ice through the wheels by raising the racks in sections, currents are then induced to pass acr(»ss the face of the racks, "n that the floating ice, etc., may l)e carried off. The great trouble with frazil ice is due to its fn-ezing on the racks and the wheels, finally stopping the supply of water. With regard to the rar-ks. thi> has been usually due, in a large measure, to the fact that the up|M>r ends nf the bars composing them have been left protruding above the water for 2 or :i feet exposed to the very cold air: in such a |M)sition these bars become chilled to the bottom, and even when only cooled to two or three one-thousandths of a degree below freezing |M»int, it is sufficient to cau.«e the frazil ice to adiiere to the bars and commence the clogging process. This trouble may be eliinitiati'd to a great extent by making tht upper part of the rack of wood, and keepinn the metal bars entirely submerged, thus preventing the conduction of lie.ii from bars to the atmosphere, and the consequent cooling below freezing point. Besides this method of submerging the metal of the racks, schemes have been brought forward for heating them, such as using hollow bars through which steam may be driven. In many plants instead of this, the head works are housed and heated, not only to provide a good working room for the men fighting tiie 22 ItEI'ARTUEyT OF THE lyTERIOli 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 ice, but also to prevent the subcooling of the racks. One of the most successfu schemes has been that employed by one of the plants in Ottawa; there the tops of the bars are encased with sheeting, steam pipes being also enclosed- by this means ice troubles have been prevented to a great extent. The use of a hve steam jet in the wheel case and guide vanes to prevent the freezing or clog- mg up of the wheel entrance has been quite successful in several plants iiuw uivEU rnnuR .i\n .stor.ioe SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e 23 CHAPTER IV METEOROLOGICAL PHENOMENA. RAINFALL. Cenebai.. The importance of a study of precipitation in connection with tlie flow of streams cannot be emphasizedtoo mucii; its influence on stream flow is a v«'ry direct one and, without study, the erroneous conclusion is reached that the relation between precipitation and run-off is a simple one. A little time spent in the study of the question soon reveals the fallacy of this assumption, for the relationship is anything but simple, being influenced by a great many physical features of a rather indeterminate nature. The collection of precipitation data all over the country has been carried on for a comparatively long term of years, whereas data regarding the run-off of streams are rather meagre; if, therefore, some general relation can be estab- lished between rainfall and run-off, the study of the streams from the stand- point of power production can be placed upon a more satisfactory basis. In the West, and particularly in that part of the eastern slope of the liockies in which we are interested, run-off data have been collected for a very short term of years, and only during the last three has a continuous record of the discharge l)een kept; thus the importance of a general relationship between recorded precipitation and run-off is all the more apparent. The distribution of rainfall in any district or part of the country is not uniform. The records throughout Canada, generally, except in the eastern prov- inces, do not extend over a sufficiently long period, nor are the stations widely enough scattered to define areas in which certain amounts of rainfall may be expected. In the West, an examination of the available records seems to indi- cate a general conformation to conditions found to the south, in the United States; that is, that the lines of equal rainfall are generally north and south, or roughly parallel to the mountain ranges; there are of course divergences due to local influences. Relation ok Precipitation to Altitude. (Jenerally speaking, precipitation decreases with the increase in altitude; it has l)een found in travelling westward away from the .\tlantic that as the country rises, the rainfall decreases. This general rule, however, does not seem to apply to the particular case we are studying, namely, the precipitation in the valley of the Bow river; in fact, the direct opjjosite is apparently the case both here and in practically all the territory forming the eastern slope of the Rockies. An examination of the records will show that as the altitude increases on the east- ern slope, the precipitation increases; special local influences ar'> at work here, however, the mountain ranges in which are situated the sources of the rivers, causing this reversal of the general rule. The warm, moisture-laden winds from the Pacific are first intercepted by the mountain."! of the Coast range and deflected upwards to mingle with coid air currents or to come in contact with land at a lower temperature; becoming chilled below the temp<'rature of saturation, they deposit some of the moist i>re T 24 DEPARTUEST OF THE I\TEmoH 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 as snow or rain as they pass over the mountains, giving rise to the heavy pn-- Mpitation near the coast, the greatest recorded on the continent. They theii pass over a stretch of low-lying land, depositing but little moisture until "the Selkirk range is reached, where the process is repeated. When the Rocky mountains are reached the humidity of the air has become much reduced, but the low tem- peratures reached at the higher altitudes is sufficient to cause more precipitation; therefore, in the Bow River basin, with which we are dealing and which is on the eastern slope of the Rockies, it is at the higher altitudes that the greatest pre- cipitation occurs. The alternation of mountain ranges with stretches of country of low altitude is accepted as the cause of the arid and semi-arid regions to l)"e found to the east of the continental divide. Value of Records. In making a study of rainfall in any district, it should be borne in mind that the average precipitation gives only a relative view of the question, as great variation from the average annual precipitation may occur at different points in the district. In this regard no general law can be made to apply; the number of conditions contributing are so great and variable that, for special purposes, a detailed study of the rainfall in the locality is necessary. When studying precipitation records extending over a given period, it is necessary to know what value may be attached to them. Sir Alexander Binnie has given this question careful consideration in a paper published in the pro- ceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 109, pages 89 to 172. He reached the conclusion that for records extending over a period of twentv-five years, the mean obtained would be within 2 per cent of the true mean. ' The conclusions reached bv Mr. Rafter in a discussion of this paper were: that, for a period of five to ten ,( ars, the probable extreme difference from the mean would be 15 per cent, and of ten to fifteen years, 4.75 per cent. Other authorities have expressed the opinion that it is necessary to have records for a period as great as forty years in order that the mean may represent the true mean prpcipitation withm five per cent. IiT Cuntiitiimo (°»s('n
  • HiviT. IMiot.)l,> M. C. Ilin.liy, ROW RIVER POWER .4\A) STORAGE 25 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Accuracy of Records. In Canada, the recording stations are all under the direction < ' me Meteoro- logical Service, and a standard method of obtaining the records is adopted. It is to he noted, however, that the placing of the recording instruments can have a very great influence upon the accuracy of the records. To arrive at the average precipitation upon a district, it is necessary that a^ many records as po.ssihle in the area to be considerbd should be available, as conclusions based upon records from a limited number of stations are liable to be considerably in error. An ideal condition under which to study rainfall data would bo "attained if the stations were uniformly distributed over the territory, or placed along each branch of the stream of which the relation between run-off and precipitation was to be established. Ice Conditions— Cttseadc River. DisTHiBi HON (IF Phbciimtatio.n. Photo by .\r. C. Hendry. A study of the periodical distribution of the rainfall is intercstii . Cciicr- ally tliis distribution throughout the year, fiom vcar to vcar, is fairly constant in any ihstrict. but is cHfterent in different districts; fi.r instance, there is a similarity in the distributitm in the different localities along the PacKic coa.st • the .same may be said of the territory to the east of the Hockies, while that portion around the Creat Lakes has its typical distril)utioii. Two tables .showing the fluctuation intiie annual precipitation recorded at HantT and Calgary have been prepared, and appear at the end of the reiM.rt At Hanff, the records are ava. able at intervals from 181K) to 18, from which year the> are contmuous to date; during that perioil, the maximum |)recipitation occurred in 1902, 30.59 inches Iwing recorded, and the minimum was l().8:i inriesin 1903; the mean yearly precipitation for twenty years is 19.13inches. At ( aigary, the records are available from 188.5 to date' during which interval the lowest recorded annual precipitation occurred in 1892, 7.91 inches being the 28 UEPARTMEXT OF THE IXJEHWU 5 QEORQE v., A. 1915 amount; and in 1902, the maximum precipitation occurrred, 34.57 inches being recorded; the mean yearly precipitation over the period of twenty-seven years is lb. 10 mches. Owing to the scattered location of the recording stations in the district at Banff, Calgary, and Jumping Pound (from the latter, only partial records are available)— they do not truly represent the conditions obtaining in the basin. As has been mentioned before, the precipitation increases in this locality with the altitude; the altitude of the station at Calgary is approximatelv 3,400, that at Jumping Pound about 4,200, and at Banff 4,525 feet, and an exainination of the records will show a greater precipitation at Banff and Jump- ing Pound than at Calgary, that recorded at Banff being the heaviest of the three. The sources of the Bow river and its tributaries are at much greater altitude than is the gauging station at Banff; in fact the greater part of the drainage area above Kananaskis falls lies above this altitude, so that the stations are by no means representative of the greater part of the drainage basin. Relation of Precipitation to Runoff. If the records of precipitation are compared with those of the run-off on the »^asin, it will be found that the recorded run-off exceeds the precipitation as recorded at Banff, by as much as 25 per cent. This condition is by no means uncommon for mountai-. districts. Mr John R. Freeman, in his report on the Hetch Hetchy Water Supply for San Francisco, says:— "In regard to the excess of run-off over precipitation, the fact that depth of run-off exceeded depth of rainfall at outlet simply proves that the average precipitation for the catchment as a whole was far greater than at this comparatively sheltered spot of lower altitude at the outlet of the valley. This condition holds in the Bow basin, and emphasizes the need of more stations for the recording of precipitation. On account of the short period over which complete run-off data are avail- able, and the few precipitation recording stations in the catchment area, no defimte relation can be established between run-off and precipitation. The only conclusion that can be arrived at from a study of these data is that for the water years from 1909 to 1911, the mean precipitation has been neariy equal to the mean vearly precipitation for the last sixteen years, as recorded at Banff. It IS fair, therefore, to assume that the run-off during the same years represent approximately the mean run-off conditions during a like period. Division of the Year. In considering the relation of precipitation to run-off, a period known as a water year is made use of, instead of the calendar year. This period for the Bow Basm district may be assumed as extending from October 1 until Sentember JO, for practically all of the water is obtained from the mountains, and from October 1 on, the precipitation in the form of snow is stored in the mountains to be held until the warm sun of the following oarlv summer releases it. to form the summer freshets which occur during May, June and July. TEMPKRATURE. . a Tfn'Pt'rature in the Bow river drainage area is one of the great factors influencing the discharge of the river; in the upper part of the catchment area there is not a month in the year in which frost cannot be expected. The range of temperature is great, the range of mean temperatuie at Banff (see tables) is U__±aL IIOOO PLATt n 90 eo TO WW Wll WW WW •Ml W« 4oL 4» ^ 4*. d*. 4» a». 4a. 4*. 4»~— — 4»— - BOW JIYER MEAN OMiyTEMItRATUfCjN DEGREES rMWENHEIT Apnl mo. to D«c«mb*r 1812 •• AT BANFF. ALTA^ - lOOO 26 ai re 1( at a\ 3, ex in th al dt ar th re. ur H Si Bti ab de on W£ th. It ap Bo 30, Oc to th( infl the of 1 M DAILY DISCHAR6C l» OF THl HOBBRRHOe AND MEAN DAILY TEMPERATURE II iiSSH Novemb«rgt-»'|gj2 BANFF, ^^2-MKlffiPanv reoori. on_PeH««r ■ ^1 y.-C; He^-O • Cor )80' T3 C P a u o C (9 X (5 16 Ci 1 400 I300 lOOO aoo- eoo 400 200 - O-" -30 -40 — 'T- I NOTEi 0»ilv d'^charge Ct^r^e s j '^•mpoen prepared, showing graphically this relationship — the daily discharges of tue Bow river at Banff have been plott«d continuously, and on top of this has been plotted the mean daily t«mperature as recorded at Banff from April, 1910, to December 1912. .\ .other diagram, Plate No. 3, has been prepared for the period Noveiiil)er 6, 1912, to March 6, 1913, showing the mean daily discharge for the Bow river at Horse- shoe fulls, and the mean daily temperature as recorded at Banff A study of these diagrams will reveal how direct is the influence of tempera- ture upon the discharge of the river; during months of low tempi-rature the (>iing on only eighteen days, consequently it affects not only the source of the river but also the actual flow in the river its<'lf. 28 DBPART-VENT OF THE IXTERIOR 5 GEORGE v.. A. 1915 CHAPTER V. RUN-OFF. GENERAL. All rivers having their source on the eastern slope of the Rocky mountains have a characteristic flow quite different from that of the rivers of Eastern ( "anada. Generally speaking, in the latter streams the low-water conditions i-xist during the summer months, normal flow occurring throughout the winter months, and high water during the spring. This condition is reversed in the case of the mountam streams. The low-water stage of the rivers extends over the winter months; the flood stage is reached during the early summer, then gradually subsides, the normal stage being reached in the late summer and early fall. These conditions are typical of the mountain streams, and the Bow river and Its tributaries are no exception to the general rule. For the section above ( algarj-, a hydrograph has been prepared, showing conditions at Horseshoe falls, and it may be considered as typical of the discharge conditions in regard to armual distribution of flow, at any point in the section. (See plate No 1) The division of the year according to the calendar does not correspond with the regulation of the nver's flow, and it has been found advantageous there- tore to make use of a division of the year corresponding to this annual cycle- this division has been called the "water year." The water year in the district of which the Bow valley forms a part, extends trom October 1 to September 30; it is of course an arbitrary division, but it approxunates very closely to the different stages of the rivers, beginning with the low-water period. The river derives the greater part of its water from the mountains; roughly speaking, after the first of October, all precipitation of moisture in the mountains is in the form of snow, and remains in that condition until melted by the warm sun during the following summer. The fluctuation of flow of the river during the eariv part of the fall and wint«r months, say from September 1 until November l, is dependent almost entirely on the rainfall in the lower part of the drainage basin. (See hydro- graph of Bow River, Plate No. 1.) During these months the flow is gradually (liminishmg, due to the storage of precipitation in the form of snow and ice in the higher altitudes. From December 1 until April 1 may be called the low- xvater penod; the river during this period is dependent almost entirely upon the discharge of ground water, springs, and other underground sources. Ex- treme lo\v water may be expected to occur during January and Februarv; after the end of tebruary the flow is augmented by the melting of snow in the lower parts of the va leys, and the discharge is increased gradually throughout March and Apnl and by May 16 the first of the floods generally appear; the discharge best example of this is on the Ghost river, though no attempt has been made to arrive at any conclusion as to the volume of underiiow in any ca 3. The Ghost river owes its name to the fact that at certain points in its course the complete flow of the river disappears. From a point well up in the mountains the valley of the Ghost river is, for the greater part of its length, very heavily covered with gravel. (See repro- duction, page 14.) In many places the valley is quite wide, and during low water the stream is split up into a number of small rivulets, each follo\\ing its own course across these wide flats; where the gravel is deep, the total low flow of the river disappears in the gravel, to reappear farther downstream. Another example of underflow in the district is found uix)n the Elbow. On this river it has been noted through the coniparist)u of practically simul- taneous gaugings, that there was apparently l.'ss water flowing at one point than was recorded at another higher upstream. Such conditions have been noted in other places, but no attempt has been made to arrive at the magnitude of the underflow at any point. The existence of this underflow means that there is a flow available for power production larger than gaugings would lead one to expect. The placing of a structure in the stream-bed has the effect of intercepting this sub-surface flow and causing it also to pa-ns thrtnigh the structures. It also has an important bearing upon the consideration of the relative discharge of difl'erent tributaricM, and so should not 1h« ignored in any scheme of regulation, or in the study of any hydrographs prepared from current meterings. 25k -4 30 nKPART.VE\r OF THE lyTKRIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Low-Watek Discharge. u In the winter months the stream flow is low, and during the period Decem- ber 15 to March 1, the extreme condition is reached. Just how extreme this condition is may be realized by a study of the following figures: The maxi- mum flood discharge recorded at Horseshoe falls during the period 1910-1911 was on July 24. 1911, when a flow of 14,770 c.f.s. was noted; on January 24, the same year, a minimum dischi'-ge of 590 c.f.s. was recorded; for the water- year 1910-11, the mean daily discharge for the period January 1 to May 1 was 851 c.f.s.; for the period October 1 to January 1 the mean tiaily flow was 1,983 c.f.s. During the remainder ol the water-year, the flow was high. In the above year the discharge during the latter part of December was high, the highest daily flow being December 31, when a discharge of 1,904 c.f.s., was noted; on the first of January, an abrupt change took place, the discharge being under 900 c.f.s., so that the periods for which the mean discharge are given are fairly chosen. Flood Dischabge. The discharge of a river during flood period, is a factor in any study of power development and is of prime importance. As soon as the design of a struc- ture to be placed in a water course is taken up, the question arises as to what volume of water it may be called upon to discharge under flood conditions, and the best method of safely taking care of the flow at such a time. Mountain streams are noted for the great difference between their normal and their flood discharge; instances are on record where the ratio between max- imum and minimum flow is as high as 1 to 40, and 1 ♦o 50. The Bow river belongs to this class of streams; it is on record that the flood discharge at Cal- gary has been as high as 54,000 c.f.s. (in the flood of 1897), while the low-water discharge is known to be, at times, less than 1,000 c.f.s. at the same point. In an interesting report, Mr. P. M. Sauder, Chief Hydrographer of the Irrigation Branch, discusses the floods on the Bow river, and estimates the flood discharge in round numbers at 60,000 c.f.s. ; ho also speaks of several other floods which have occurred; one in the early part of July, 1902, that followed a period of heavy rains, was very destructive, but it is estimated did not reach the discharge of that of 1897. Several flood" which have occurred are mentioned in Mr. Saudcr's report, one in 1879 is stated to have been the largest of which there is any record, and another in 1884, evidence of which places it as 1 foot lower than the flood of 1897; all these floods occurred before any systematic record was kept of run-off data relating to the Bow. Since 1908, almost continuous records have been kept of the run-off, with the exception of the winter months cf the first few years; in that time, only two floods of any note have occurred, one in July, 1909, when a discharge of 23,000 c.f.s. was recorded, and another in July, 1912, which is supposed to exceed that of 1909, but for which there are no figures available In the same report an estimate has been made of the probable flood dis- charge for different reaches of the river; they are as follows: From Kananaskis falls to Ghost river, 40,000 c.f.s.; from the Ghost river to the mouth of thr Jumping Pound creek, 50,000 c.f.s.; between the Jumping Pound and the mouth of the Elbow i . or, 60,000 c.f.s. ; and below the mouth of the Elbow river, 70,000 c.f.s. This discharge, it will be interesting to note, averages about 19 c.f.s. per square mile of drainat;e area, or a precipitation of seven-tenths of an inch per twenty-four hours. Winter Co.n'ditions. The factor which governs in any hydro-electric development, is the discharge of the river during the low-water period; in this district the low-water period occurs during the winter months; therefore, investigation of the winter conditions is of prime importuncc. ItUW niVKR POWER .4.Vi> STOKAOF. » SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e In a previous chapter, the question of temperature was dealt witli, in its relation to run-oflf, and it was there shown that a direct relation exists between the two, especially during the winter months. A brief reference to Plates 2 and 3 is again necessary; it will be seen that a low discharge occurs simultaneous with, or immediately after, a \o\f temperature, and that a high discharge occurs approximately at the time of high temperature. In studying Plate 3 it should be borne in mind that some discrepancy is due to the effect of storage on the natural How of the river, but the close relationship between discharge and temperature is apparent. The inference drawn from this fact is that the decrease in discharge at times of low temperature is due to the effect of the cold weather upon the flow in the immediate section of the river studied, and not upon the source of the river. , • i . The winter flow of the river is also dependent upon other sources which do not show the immediate effect of temperature, the decrease in flow being gradual. Stream Measurement. The measurement of the flow of the Bow river, and streams in the vicinity, has been carried on more or less regularly for some years; gaugings were made as early as 1894, but no continuous records were kept until 1908. From 1908 until 1911, the records are only available for what might be termed the open- water season, while during this period the records are sometimes available as late as the end of December of each year, the flow during Januarj-, February. March, and in some cases the early part of April, was not recorded ; this particular interval, during which the low-water flow occurs, is the vital period from a power standpoint. This work has been carried on by the Hydrographic Survey of the Irrigation Branch. In the early part of 1911, the work embodied in this report was instituted, and, at the beginning of the same year, the collection of records covering the low-water stage of the river was commenced on the Bow river and three of its tributaries. In order that a complete set of records might be available in the district, an arrangement was made between the Irrigation Branch and the Water Power Branch, whereby additional stations were established at points suggested by Mr. C. H. Mitchell, the expense being borne by the Water Power Branch, and the work of establishing and operating done by the Irrigation Branch; the stations established under this arrangement were; Ghost river, Kananaskis river, Pipestone creek, Bow river at Laggan, and Cascade river. From a power standpoint, the need of continuous records of run-off in these streams, especially the low-water flow, is very pressing. Almost as oft n as estimates of the low-water flow are made by parties interested in power deve- lopment, it is found, when records are subsetjuently made available, that the flow has been overestimated, frequently as much as 100 per cent. This is no doubt partly due to the rivers being investigated in the summer months, when the flow is high, or above the normal; ii condition which is quite the opposite to that found in some other localities at the same period; this, together with the lack of data, is no doubt the cause of errors in estimate. Discharge Data. Included as an Appendix are tables giving the daily discharge of tlie Bow river at different points in its course; also similar tables for the different tributaries above Calgary, and including the Elbow river; these tables are compiled from information placed at the disposal o( the Water Power Branch by the Irrigation Branch. In connection with this information, where gaps occur in the records, they are filled out with infonuation obtained from the records of the Calgary Power Company; this refers particularly to the discharge of the Bow river 25e 4 1 * OEPARTMEyT OF THE lyTERlOR 6 GEORGE v.. A. 1915 ritprthi rLofn '"^'*° Pacific Railway bridge and Moriey; in this stretch of the «i !*lJ f records are not continuous at any one point, so that the curves etc £SS at nfff.^'?* ^^T*^^ Horseshoe falls) arfa combination of infSat on seciired at deferent points. Up to January, 1912, the Bow was gaueed at Mor- S.&i bet^^*? that point and Hors^hoe falls only one strSm-BowFort creek-enters, and it is of no magnitude. Since Januaty, 1912, the gaurinRs of wit nf^K^'^ir* taken fron? the Canadian Pacific Railway bridge abouflU miles H^hi fJrtrt" "^«'; .b^t^ee-^ the Canadian Pacific Railway bridge and riStmSf^^H ^TJT'''- "^" ^'J**" *^« »°^'- **>•« i« a stream of con- hi^liZ^fT^^^' ^"= *¥'*i* * 8*"«*"8 station near its mouth where records b«ve been taken since September, 1911. The Calgary Power Company keens records of the discharge at their plant at Horseshoe falls. '-°°»Pa°y ^^^P^ noin^ T?!rtn/f *i'-* periods are plotted from the data gathered at these several P^wSvimLw'^"'*^^*^ °1^ ? this connection that comparing the Calgary during thTr^tf/H" k""'**' ^^}' *-^°'* °^ *^« Irrigation Branch, the agreement &l JriH^r T^t° T^.^»ter .8 wasted, is very close for records obtained at Paoi&pSfc. S^^M^"" *^^ combined records for the stations at the Canadian Pacific Railway bndge and KananasWs river. During the high-water neriod S ffTw^ T''' "^ T'^^^ '■ the discrepancy between the ref orr's noTubt fZ .«.LY'^^"*'""^*°«''T°,8 ^'""^ """de at- different stages of the river; t5 W ^ °""" '^""°« ^''^^ '^***'' '^h^" the discharge varies from hour mont^W*Hil*lIi!! are also inserted giving the maximum, minimum and mean "nt sSaJ^rfnhi Sr- ^^ ^^A T""^^^^ '^'e^'^^.'K^ •" ^''^^-f^^t, for the differ- of the^ riv.r ot ^if*""'' •"'i'^ diagrams showing graphically the discharge hJ^x^Z!lZl *Vk.'^^^'^*'' 'i?""*''^' ^»°^' Horseshoe falls and CalgaiJ, J?!'^Il^^ ayaUable data (see diagram. Plate No. 1). Also the Elbow river H'l/IH %Ufi . tQ Mi 4U3ai,.v»n- f< Hl0 l if» f ^ - •)«-.-•* —4 \' ,>v.>^ :iA T: i ■ rr»i r. ^ V *- PLATK n .BOW RIVER MonthW Oi«ch.r- f row »te^ WMl ID B«i. IMl - MtgHi'^fT-^lA-t* — .mju./6itnCi^. 6»l«*ListeSSL T t J ll J u 1 M- eM. |A j ij ^H ^^ ^■iiA mmimmsmm-mii ^IIIIJUHI IliliiiiilifiUtliiJ Ml Wt b r 1« f/ Ohl \ a — tl w B A hi re & F th di th to en of baj at P14 r,*»!»i ■*/!,• -*ri st*-«r»«ui .. .0 -.■-s>a-i^-;' f^«^ - 3T06* 1:1 VHI .^ ot 0181 V >eae u soo 400 zoo i£kfi£LJL 8 FRAY MVRH •ANPF. ALSCMTA. 1L»0 M 111 O X NOTE'. llM»a»el n i y fcrpirti«m»ini,| BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA&E SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e CHAPTER VI. EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS. EAU CLAIRE PLANT. The first hydro-electric development on the Bow river, in the section from Calgary west, is that of the Eau Claire Lumber Company, situated within the city limits of Calgary. The development makes use of the natural fall in the river, by mean." of a diverting dam (pile and timber construction) and a canal, and the head developed is in the neighbourhood of 12 feet. The diverting dam is situated just above the bridge crossing the Bow river at Ninth Street West, and the intake and canal are on the south side, the canal following the south bank for about one-half mile. Advantage is taken of small islands or gravil bars, and these, together with timber pile structure, form the stream side of the canal. At the lower end, an island forms the north side of the canal or forebay, the original channel between it and the mainland forming the tail-race. Leffel wheels, set in an open timber wheel case, spanning the channel, are geared to two jack shafts, bolted to two generators. The installation is for 600 horse- power. The head developed is about 12 feet, the total flow of the river at low water being utilized. The agreement between the company and the old Territorial Government, later approved by Act of Parliament, gives the company the right to the total low flow of the river at that point, and an amount equal to the low flow at high and normal stages of the river. The development is not on a very permanent basis, and cannot be a very efficient one, though with such a small head, and the restricted flow of the river that exists, the expenditure of not very large sums of money upon its development would be wtarranted. Thi8 plant supplies power for lighting throughout the city of Cal(pary, having a franchise for the ("'itribution of power. The water-power is assisted by steam generated power, and in consequence the service is liable to very few interruptions, but it is understood that during the winter season the operation of the water-power plant is interrupted for considerable periods, owing to ice troubles. LAKE LOUISE POWER PLANT. General. This plant while very small, and scarcely to be considered from a com- mercial standpoint, is mentioned for two reasons: first, because it lies within th<< territory studied; and second, because it is operated in ronnection with tho Canadian Pacific Railway hotel at lake Louise. Dbvelopuent. The power station is situated about half a mile from the chalet. Tlie water is conveyed from lake Louise by means of a pipeline about 2,800 feet long to the power station, which is situated on Chalet creek, the outlet of the lake; and which also forms the tail-race. 34 DEPART Vf:\r OF THE I\TERiOlt 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Intake. A bridge leading across the outlet of the lake is so designed as to form a ci^t side of the creek for the greater part of the distance, and the gross head devolowd IS approximat^'ly 140 feet. ' Equipment. The pipeline leads to a 24 inch S. Morgan Smith whe«>l which runs at 600 r.p.m. The wheel is rated at 100 horse-power, and is belted to a 7.5 k.w 3-nhase genenitor which operates at 1,200 r.p.m. and has an ex.-iter mounted on the shaft. Thecurrrnt is transmitted to the chalet at 2,r,00 volts where it is stepped down tr 125 volts for lighting and other uses. UtILIZATIO!! of I'OWER. The power output is dinposed of at the chalet .md also is used for lijthtinir the station and grounds at jjiggan. The maximum load i- ..Mturallv durine the ttmnst season which corresponds t.o the period .if maximum di-haisre from the lake, so that the power .U-maiuls are ..isilv m.i The development is intere-ling fnmi th»- -landpoint of utiii/,;,tion -4 the flow, which ,s very limited .at all seas.,,, durin^^ the h«&-wat t .*.riod. and illUMrates the value of small hydro-^l.-f Tri. pl:n.i- u, the towist .ewtrev. HUUS1>H(^E 1 AIJ,> PL.^XT. The laig.,t power .levdoimient on tii4- I low riv-r. st im-s.^nt ...ni- pieted, IS that oi th.- Calgary Power C.mpany. This plant is lo.-ated at Horse- shoe falls, about M nul.-s west of Calgarr-, and iier.' one of the v.-rv few .on- centratiMl tails to Im> iound upon the How. i, utilized. At this point th.> How river in its witural sVaW flows thr<.ugh a d.vp gorge the walls and bed of which are formed of ;. sl.al<. i.nuh.l with sandston. at the |M>!nt ot dev.'lopnient a r.nk outcropping, whi.h is in the nature of an anti- .• iiial . ip. ...■••urs. Tins has been .•onsid.-n.blv eroded, jin.l f..rms ;, drop in the b..i ,,f the river of apim.ximat.'ly 25 f.M^t. A s..li.| ..oncr.t.^ .lam l,;.s 1 „ huilt ;irm .- ihe gorge U|H)n the lip of this oiit.rop, and tl.js. with the Uidiird tali, produ.is ji h<>:Hl of 70 feet. Dam. Th- dam (.see r.produetion page .S.")) is of solid spijlwav tvp.'. wiili ,n insi)ecti.m and drainage tunnel. In addition to the spillwav therearr-a nunil.er of sluice-ways, provided to take care of flood discharges: these an> .iclit in num. MT- four being simply stoplog openings and four being s.ipplie.l with Hluic-gates. rh<" former are 7 f.H-t by 22 feet, the stopjogs b.'ing handle.l by means of haii.l win-hes, the other four are controlled bv .sliii,<.-g„t..s 1<) f,.,.| i,v 14 feet of a modifi..d "Ston.'y Type," operated hvdraulicallv. Th.- spjihvav section "« HO/M-t long and togeth.-r with the sluices, i. sutticient to .lis.harge a flood of 40,000 c.f.s. The iiis|K!ction tunnel, access to which is gain, il bv means of a well situate 2. The possibility of leakage around the north end of the dam wa.s met bv excavating a cons^idcrable distance into the cliff, for the total height of the dam; t M clift conshsts of a soft shale, liable to disintegration on exposure to air but is the excavations were completely filled with concrete, any water leaking through the seams in the shale would be forced to travel a considerable distance, and the (luantity would be great y reduced by friction, and as the seams are liable to silting, the leakage would be very nearly eliminated. 3. The inspection tunnel, before mentioned, also serves the purpose of a drainage tunnel. Drainage holes, about 10 inches square, and placed 16 feet 8 inches apart, extend from the springing line of the arch of the tunnel upward through the body of the dam, so that any leaks that mav develop through •TOcks will be intercepted and directed into the drainage tunnel. Other holes 3 inches in diameter, and about 12 feet (i inches apart, have been drille.i ,lown through tlu' base of the dam into the utul^Tlying rock for depths of from 10 feet to 18 feet; these are cased at their upi.er end, in order that the quantitv of anv water leaking through them and also the upward pressure may b.- measured f *i \ ^*>°/""nt.' 1"'" ''^*^" extended into the rock forming the north abutment ' 1 V .u"" ^°'" *" '''^^t-'!"';*' '^f **»™<' ^» f«<>t, so that most of the leakage aroun.l the em, If there IS any, will iKMntercepted by the tunnel; this expectation hi.s been realized by the .stopping of leakage going on before the tunnel was exf erul.-d • the tunn.-l Itself is drained through an opening in the downstream side of the dam ;>. Ihe protection of the foundation of the dam at tiie downstream si,l,« has required careful consideration. In order that erosion due to the water comine <.ver the spillway section might be eliminated, Mr. Freeman re.-onimend.d that he apron of tlie dam be extended downstream about 40 fwt, heavilv rein- forced and anchored to the rock, and that baffle piers be built on the apron to HHiuce the velocity of the water and thereby prevent any possible erosion Other recommendations were made, one was the building of a baffle wall on th.' crest of the old falls at the south end of the dam, ami the facing of tin- diff below to F)revent undermining, but these recommendations, together with that of placing of a sand blanket over the bed of the river, have not vet been .•.i-ried out J i "^ _n =^^~ Dls^i-am of Cr««r of Dom. k _ _ Pl.n .f Dr.m.^ Xn„.| .K.^„, p.„t..,. ., ^„||.j ^.1,, j_^ C.m.-r r.,.;,^ ^., |,^r„| h^i., j.,ii.j :. f,.„, ^ PkArt w. =1 t<«l«a fw InapactiM .._.1 4. , -«-^e5.rjffirj ^ 0««M fW ln«p««ri««i — ua_.|- -t~ ^^-r^- iJiMapMll» Mm BOW RIVER i:m«giia>-! gw^%»-». \nt thrq to If watt of th curl, rcalli tiiiiit I voqxd over the S forcol rcdue rPi'oB (pf thi prcve • if :i 8 ikjw iiivKif I'itwr.K wit s'Toii.uih: 39 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Inspection and Approval. In a foregoing part of this report^ the policy of tlie Water Power Braneh in regard to the approval and inspection of any water-power development htv* l)een set out. This policy in the case of Horseshoe falls, has, with the exception of the appointment of a re.sident engineer, been carried out; Mr. John R. Freeman was conHultcd by the company with regard to the plans, and Mr. C. H. Mitchell, CK., as consulting engineer on the Bow river work, made several inspections of the plant both during the latter part of construction, and after completion, and \m> submitted two reports to the braneh covering the work. KANANASKLS FALLS PLANT. General. The Kiinanaskis Falls plant i.« placed under the heading of plants in exist- ' iiit<, though at the present writing it is only in the course of construction. Site. The ."itc of the Kananaskis Falls plant is at the falls of that name on the Mow river. These are about 2 miles upstream from the Horseshoe Falls plant, and immediately below the junction of the Bow and Kananaskis rivers; in fact the l;itt<'r stream, entering from the south, adds its waters within the limit of the rapids at tin- head of the falls. The total fall at thi^ point occurs in four sections; first, the rapids just nil ntioned, and then a series of three falls, giving a total drop of approximately ■>."> feet. Above the rapids the Bow river is wide and fairly shallow (see repro- tliii I'.Mi page 40), the banks are comparatively low, gradually increasing in htiirht to the head of tha falls. Below the falls, the bank.? are perpendicular. till- river flowing through a rather wide canyon. Tha banks of the Kananaskis .ire liigh; the west bank is perpendicular, rising at least 40 feet above the surface of the stream; the slope of the east bank is more gradual for the first few hundred yards, but after that it is high and abrupt. The Canadian Pacific railway crosses the Kananaskis river by a bridge that spans the stream about 2.50 yards above its mouth, and the Bow river by another bridg? about 1 mile above the falls. The existence of these bridges has a very ilirect tiearing upon the question of development at this point. DEVELOP.MENT. The general scheme of development adopted is that of a dam, placed across the h(!ad of the fills, by means of which the water is raised and diverted into .•I canal excavated on the south side of the river. The water will be conveyed hy the canal to an intake structure situated on the .south bank and proviibd with suiiiihle racks and gates for controlling tlu' flow. From the intake the water will be cc iveyeii in pressure tunnels, to the wheels placed in concrete scroll chambers situated lielow the power station, and thence in draft tubes to dis- iharge tunnels leading to the river below the falls. The working head for which lh<' plant is designed is 70 feet (see plans.) Dam. The dam at the head of the falls will raise the water to an elevation of 4,15.'> feet sea level datum; this elevation was finally determined owing to the existence of the Canadian Pacific Railway bridge across the Kananaskis river, about 250 yards from the mouth. The bridge is of the inverted truss type, and the elevation of the lower chord was the controlling feature. Permission was S! ■ ired from the Canadian Pacific Hailwav to raise the tracks at this m atocon MsounioN tbt chart (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No. 3) 1.0 Ui |2J |2J |U ■^ ■■i Itt |U ■ 2.2 Iti Li |M ■■■ IK U |40 ■ 2.0 u ^^^^H t.: 1 11.8 L25 |U ii.6 ^ /APPLIED IM/1GE he t6S3 Eoal Mam SirMt Roch«ttr. H9m Torh U609 USA ('!«) ta? - 0300 - Pk-on« 40 DEPARTMEVT OF TBE IXTERIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1915 E i I i e ^sS!mTSm«m»m BOW niVER POWFIR 4.VO STOKiOK 41 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e point 3 feet. The new elevation of the bottom chord became 4,161.75. The top elevation for Hash-boards and stoplogs authorized by the department has been fixed at 4,155.75, or 6 feet below the bottom chord of the Canadian Pacific Railway bridge over the Kananaskis. The dam is being built upon a ledge of rock extending practically across the river (see plan), and is in three sections. The first section, which is about 200 feet long, is nearly parallel to the centre line of the canal; the shore end of this section is in the nature of a retaining wall, while the outer 180 feet, or that portion nearest the angle, is of the spillway section, made up of nine 17 foot openings with 3 foot piers between. The central section is 174 feet long, and is provided with eight 17-foot openings, with 3-foot piers between and one 24-foot opening in the nature of a spillway. The section is built partially upon, and partially btlow, the ridge of rock mentioned (see plans), and is provided with two inspection tunnels, one above and one below the ridge; drains are placed at frequent intervals leading from the face of the rock to the inspection tunnel. In addition, a line of holes is being drilled along the face of the dam down through the rock, and grouted, the idea being to close any seams that may underlie the dam. (See reproductions pages 144 and 148). The third section, forming the connecting link between the central section and the north bank of the river, runs upstream, making an angle of about 30' with the centre portion. It is 268 feet in length between abutments, and is provided with eleven 18-foot openings, with intermediate piers 7 feet thi^k. It is proposed to control these 18-foot openings with stoplogs operated from a deck running the length of the dam, the bottom of the deck being at elevation 4,162. The elevation of sills of these openings has been finally determined as 4,138. Working level being 4,155, which may be raised to 4,155.75 by flash- boards. This section is also provided with an inspection tuimel extending to the north bank, and having an extension in the form of a drift leading into the rock forming the north abutment; by means of this drift it is expected to cut off possible leakage around the end of the dam and minimize danger to the structure in that respect. In addition, holes were drilled in front of this wall and then grouted under pressure. Access to the inspection tunnels is had by means of a shaft in the block, forming the junction between the second and third sections: this shaft lead.s to the tunnels, and also has an opening to the lower side of the dam; there is also a shaft in the north abutment of the dam, leading to the tunnels. DiSCvIAKGING ('.\P.\CITV. The discharging capacity of the structure under certain conditions is given below in tabular form. It should be noted that, with the exception of the roll- way and log run, the discharge is dependent upon manual operation, and is not automatic except above elevation 4,155. DiscH.vRGiNo Capacity of Kananaskis Dam. Table No. 9. Klevnlion of HoKl-watcr. DiM'harKe tImiuRh ,.|cvcn lS-(t. Discliiir*' tlirounh rollwfty uluifcs in «T.-tt. Ilev. ..( sill 41.')s. and log run in nec.-ft. uiuUiiiiatio.) Dixrliiirgo ttlMURh ■iluioc-ways anj.with stnpliiKH ikt plev. 41,15 iiiutntniitie) «uo.-ft. Total DinchurKC 9CC.-fl. 4153-0 34. BOO 41 .WO 3,S.40O 4154-0 1 43.400 4i.wn #,\m 41-VlMi M.MO 4i.'.:o I M.4W 41.V< . . W.SM n MO 2,S20 .'i.4iO HHO 1.7,iO 1, 4..'5 .14.600 .Tl,400 42.400 46.100 51.240 .W,220 a4.2.VI 42 DEFARTMETiT OF THE lyTERIOK 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Canal and Forebay. Ihe canal is excavated in rock, sand and clay. The formation through which It IS excavated is rather peculiar, owing to the great tilting of the rock which IS to be found in all parts of the district, the rock surface appears as a series of saw teeth, the intervening spaces being filled with clay, sand and gravel ; through the rock section the canal is 72 feet wide, and in the earth 40 feet wide on the bottom, and 80 feet wide on top, the bottom elevation being at 4,140; It IS approximately 650 feet long. The forebay to which the canal leads is divided into two bays, one for each pressure tube, and these are in turn divided into two openings by central piers- these openings are controlled by means of "Tainter Gates" though stoplogs,' working in gains may be placed in the entrance piers. Each bay is 34 feet wide, and each opening 14 feet, the dividing pier being 6 feet wide. The method of operating is not definitely settled, but will be mechanical. Pressure Tubes. Easy entrance by wide passages is had from the forebay to the pressure tunnels, whicn are of reinforced concrete and lead to the wheels situated in wheel pits below the power house. Power Station and Equipment. The power station is built in excavation near the river bank. The necessity of placing the station in excavation was determined by the economical length of soud steel shafting connecting the generators and turbines. The substructure is of concrete and the superstructure of steel and hollow tile construction. In addition to the electrical and hydraulic equipment described below, the station ir provided with a 50-ton crane, pumps, etc. T.ie electrical equipment will consist of two vertical shaft type, direct- connected 3,750 k.v.a., 12,000 volts. 3 phase, 60 cycle generators, together wit' nee ssary exciters and motor generator set, switch apparatus, etc.; 12,000 vo... busses will be direct connected to the Exshaw line, no step-up transformers being used. With this arrangement, power mav be delivered either to Exshaw or Calgary through the Horseshoe Falls plant, the two plants being connected. The turbines are vertical shaft type, each of 5,800 h.p. capacity with scroll cases formed in the concrete, giving easy entrance to the wheels. The method of installing these wheels is similar in many respects to that used at the large plant at Keokuk on the Mississippi, Market. The market supplied with power from the Calgary Power Company'.s plants IS within 50 miles of the stations, and the demand is concentrated at two points- Calgary and Exshaw. At Exshaw the load is that derived from the cement plantj which takes all the power delivered at this point; at Calgary the load is that derived from the Canada Cement Company's plant, and the citv of Calgary. The latter buys power from the power company and distributes it by means of its own system. The demand for power has been increasing rapidly ; the company first install- Ai^^y ^'^^* ^•^'^- machines; this was at once increased by the addition of a 4,000 k.v.a. machine, and the latter is being duplicated, so that the equipment will provide for a generating capacity of approximately 18,000 h.p. In addition to the foregoing, the cnmp.any has at present under construction the plant at Kananaskis falls, which when completed will have a capacitv of 10,000 h.p. BOW i{iM:it rowF.ii a\o htoiiach 43 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e The city of Calgary has recently had an investigation made of the power situation in its various pliases, and the results of this work, which was carried out by Mr. R. A. Ross, C.E., of Montreal; are contained in a report by him. He estimated the amount of power that would be required in the near future, i.e.. by the fnll of 1913, at 12,000 k.w., and also that in ten years an output of 40,0(K) to 45,000 k.w. will be required, as.suming that the population will then be 200,000. These figures seem large, but it is pointed out in the report: — (1) "That you anticipate bonusing industries by means oi" cheap power "' (2) that " owing to cheap rates, electric light will be universally used"; a-.id (3) that "your output will be more readily absorbed by new industries, w'.iich are not committed to any particular method of power development as in old'T municipalities. . . . all of which will tend to make your demand' much higher than for a similar sized municipality in the East." Rates as Charged by City of Calgary for Power — Table No. 10. Motor Rating. Charge per horse-power per year. $ 1 - IJ horM<.-p<)W('r 1^'* 4 9 " •"■'' 10-18 " ^ ''- j9__^ '« 'It .'i'A 55 horso-powor iinil over 23 04 The eost (or lighiine i» "J cents per k.w. hour. 1012-13 peak loads:— Municipal system, the peak load in December, 1912, was 9,300 horse-power Kau Claire plant, the peak load for the same month was 2,345 horse-power 'iRowTH OF Power Load Demands Investigation. The phenomenal growth of the country at large is of necessity reflected in the growth in the demand for power, both for indvstrial uses and for light- ing. This rapid increase in demand is illustrated in the history of the munici- pal plant at Calgary, which, starting with a capacity of 260 k.w. in Noveml)er, 1905, has grown by leaps and bounds, practically doubling yearly, until at present approximately 6,000 k.w. is installed in the station. The history of the Calgary Power C<)iiii)any, which started to operate in May, 1911, with two 2,500 k.v.a. machines is similar; the first two units wore scarcely running when the installation of a third unit was commenced, and at present th< " Hh is being installed in their Horseshoe Falls plant. Even with this increji .ey are unable to keep up with the demand for power, and work is now ill progress upon a second plant at Kananaskis Falls, which wlu-n com- pleted will generate in the neighbourhood of 10,000 horse-power. These two plants combined will give a generator capacity of about 28,000 horse-power. It is reasonable to expect, therefore, that within a very short time the pre- sent sources of power will be Ioade' particular site, and only one attempt has been made at development, namely, the Eau Claire plant at Cal- gary, that has been already described. Methods of Investigation. The whole power-producing section has been investigated in a general way, while particular attention was given to the part between Kananaskis falls and Radnor, of which a complete contour survey was made. Studies were made of a number of points on the ground, and a more detailed survey made of those considered worthy of particular attention in the field. After study in the oflSce of the detail plans of these points, it has been found that there are a number worthy of consideration as feasible developments. The same method was adopted on the Elbow river; there the stretch of the river was studied carefully and after the consideration of several alternative schemes, a single development, covering nearly the whole of the power section of the river, was decided upon, and surveys were made. A storage scheme was also worked out in connection with this development. In order that these different schemes might be studied, and their feas- ibility arrived at, layouts have been worked up for the different developments with some degree of detail, and estimates based upon these have been made. It is pointed out that these layouts are for study only, and should not be considered as final designs. The sites on the Bow river to which special attention has been given are known as: — 1. Kananaskis Falls (being built). 2. Bow Fort. 3. Mission. 4. Ghost. 5. Radnor. On the Elbow river: — Elbow river site near Canyon creek. On Cascade river; — Minnewanka Dam. *.- 25e— 5 DMPABTMEIfT Of TEW ISTKBIOR S QEORQE v.. A. 191S BOW UVEB POWBB AND BTOBAOB SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« BOW FORT SITE. n I t » - s i» I '* & Genibal. The Bow river, after passing the Calgary Powei Company's plant at Horse- shoe falls, flows between high banks for about 3 miles, and at very few points in this distance is it possible to get dpwn to water level, the banks for the most part being precipitous and rising to heights of from 49 to 150, and even 200 feet in places. At several places the stream is very much confined (see topographical sheets No. 4 and No. 4A and reproduction page 41), flowing through narrow gaps in the rock outcrops. A point in regard to the geoloj^r of the river is of interest here: Below the Horseshoe falls, the general dip of the rock changes twice in a distance of 3 miles; at the Calgary Power Company's plant the mp is towards the west (see reproduction page 35), about a mile below the dip is east, while below the mouth of Bow Fort creek it has changed to the west again. About a half a mile below the mouth of Bow Fort creek the character of the banks imdergoes a change, and for a nimiber of miles below this point high steep banks alternate with wide flats. A numl^r of rapids and swifts occur between the falls and the point just mentioned, the principal ones being about half a mile, and a mile and a half below the falls, and one about three-quarters of a mile above the mouth of Bow Fort creek. The total fall between the tail-race of the Calgary Power Company's plant and the point below Bow Fort creek where the change in the banks takes place, is approximately 70 feet. Between the mouth of the creek and the end of the section just described the banks are high and almost perpendicular, especially immediately above the lower end ; j ust below the section there is a wide flat which lies on the south side of the river at an elevation of a few feet above the level of the river, and it is at this point, known as Bow Fort site that a detail study has been made. SiTB. Bow Fort site lies at the extreme lower end of the section just described, about half a mile below the mouth of Bow Fort creek and three and three- quarter miles tMow the plant at Horseshoe falls. Just above the flat mentioned, the river flows between perpendicular rock cliffs between ^0 1S Ghost are worked out; the intake structures and hydraulic eauipment are designed for a flow of 2,000 second-feet, such a flow being available for a great part of the year; the extra equipment would also act as a spare unit, or stand-by. The flood that the structures are expected to discharge safely is one of 50,000 second-feet. These, therefore, are the conditions of flow for which the plant has been designed:— A minimum flow of 1,500 c.f.s., with extra eqmpment for a dis- charge of 2,000 c.f.s. to also act as a stand-by. A maximum discharge of 50,000 c.f.s. DSTEIiOPMCNT. Several schemes of developing the power available at this point have been studied, the one here presented being finally settled upon as the most feasible. In order that these studies may be more comprehensive, designs have been prepared and are included in the report, but these are for the purpose mentioned, and are not intended as final. . . . The proposed scheme places a dam across the nver at the point in question, here the gorge is 265 feet wide, the walls are nearly perpendicular, and the nver fills the whole of the bottom of the canyon. „i, , . , ^u * On the north side of the dam line the cliff nses 25 feet from the water surface, then slopes back for a distance of 50 feet, rising another 20 feet to the foot of a rock cliff some 30 feet high, the intermediate slope being formed of gravel and disintegrated rock from the cliff above. It is proposed to remove this material and place four sluice-ways at the e^i of the dam, using the cliff for the north abutment of the structure. On the south side the cliff is higher, rising sheer 40 feet from the. water s edae. From the top of the cUff the slope is steep, rising 25 feet in 100; this sl^ is formed by the dip of the rock, which at this point is overiaid with soil to a depth of only a few inches. Head. Bv placing the dam at this point a total head of 66 feet may be developed, part of which is the natural fall in the river above the site, the extra two or three feet being obtained below. To obtain this head, the water above the dain would be backed up nearly to the taU-water of the Horseshoe Falls plant and about 2 feet would intervene between the head and tail-waters of the two plants. Dam. The dam proposed is of the hollow reinforced concrite type founded upon ledge rock existing in the river-bed; it would be 265 feet long between the cliffs of the river, and 350 feet long over all, including the sluice-ways; the total height of the structure would be 75 feet, from foundation to spillway crest. The dam would be provided with four opemngs 20 feet by 24 feet at the north end, and controlled by stoney sluice-gates provided with ProPf' "P^'ating mechanism and housed; these could be used for additional discharge during SS,! In additioMhere would be two stoplog opemngs 16 f^t long, and three 72 inch valves controlling additional sluice-ways in the base of the dam. These opeSs together with 200 feet of spillway section, will provide for a fiood dis- Ji"!t If^S^fnSn^tere that, from Canadian Pacific. Railway Company^s data relating to the high water in the Bow nver, the engineers of the Calgary PowerSany have computed that the maximum flood discharge at Horseshoe falls, which occurred in June, 1902, was 43,000 c.f.s. BOW RirER POWER AVD 8T0RA0E SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26« Intake. The intake structure would be situated on the south ^ideoiihe rh^er at the ^°^^^- Penstocks. It is proposed to have three separate penstocks f'«°^ *?« Kat'te'SShS tn the Dower-house in the provisional layout; these would be 10 feet o jncnee n iwtrr Lnd 2T0 feet long, each delivering water to one mam generator umt. the Sr units being mounted on the shaft of the generator. Power Station and Equipment. The »ite is an ideal one for development, with a high cliff on either side and a flat immediSdy Slow which provides a good location for a power station, and P'^'Vt ii i7otKVKhe pow" station on this flat jfunediately below the ^'- it S'Jf eVrr^SiKetlut^^^^^^ 1,5«) second-feet will give ^ -threSSpSU^drfSi^tSru^'uS^^^^^ ^;^^-- each^^trg^mors, etc.; the electrical W^"* ^Ke^neSs a^ S k.w. generators with exciters mounted on the ^.^tSr^,^ tn^rther ^fh a^ra^^ apparatus, wiring, transformers, etc., are provided for, together with a crane of sufficient capacity to handle tl.e station equipment. ESTIMATE OF COST OF PLAI'T. ^ T FORT SITE. Ppneral nlans have been prepared of the layout of the plant and equip- ment?TnThffono'rng is an'estLate of the cost of the plan based upon the foregoing plans, and without transmission ^ne and ternMnals. Main dam and headworks 54*600 00 K!^se;.v.:::::::::::::::::::::::: e^isooioo Machinery: ,„ f^j^ ,«» Turbines and governors Ac'Sv^nn Generators. ., . • . ^ ■■■■ • ^l'^^ Transformers and switch apparatus . . 48,000.00 Total Engineering and contingenL.es 98,530.00 30,000.00 $651,900.00 $750,430.00 Interest during construction Grand Total $780,430.00 m DEPAMTMSST Of TBM tWTBRWR 6 QEORaE v., A. 1916 StoTMe Charget — Total estkuted cost of creating ntorage above Horseehoe falls t760,00u.00 On the basu of a minimum flow of 1,500 c.f.8., the total continuous output of the river 47,300 w.h.p. Cost of storage per w.h.p $16 .00 Proportion of capital cost of storage chargeable to Bow Fort site on basis of w.h.p $144,540.00 Tranmtiation Charget. — Proportion of capital cost of transmission lines and terminal station and equip- ment chargeable to Bow Fort site $ 86,400.00 The total capital cost of the plant, including the proportion of the cost of creating storage and transmission lines with substation and equipment lo be charged against the plant, is as follows: — EOimated total Capital Coat.— Cost of plant $780,430.00 Storage....... 144,540.00 Transmission line, sub-stations, equipment, etc 86,400.00 Total capital cost $1 ,011,370.00 Cost of plant as above, $1,011,370. The head to be developed is 66 feet. This, taken with the regulated flow of 1,500 second-feet would produce 8,100 electrical horse-power, or 7,300 horse-power on the terminals in Calgary for distribution. Under 25 per cent overload, which the machines are capable of supporting continuously, the station output would be 10,125 electrical horse- power. Annual Charges. — Assuming the sale of power will reach 7,300 horse-power, the probable annual cost per horse-power will be as follows: — 1. — Interest on capital invested, assuming financing is done on Bonds at 6 per cent, sold at par $60,700.00 2. — Sinking fund to retire bonds in 30 years reinvested at 4 per cent, say If per cent 17,700.00 3. — Depreciation on plant, adjusted between general works and equipment, to provide for major repairs and renewals 15, 150.00 4. — Operation and maintenance, including management, superintendpnce, wages, for plant, transnis'^^lon line, receiving stations, etc., proportion of cto - ,, , regu- lation and minor repairs, supplies, "^te.. . 22,750.00 Total annual charges $116,300.00 Annual operating and fixed charges per horse-power. . . . $15.93 Cost per horse-power year on 50 per cent load i actor basis 31 .86 Cost per k. w. year on 50 per cent load factor basis 42.48 or 49 cent per k.w. hour. BOW RIVEH POWER AKD STORAOS * 8t88IONAL PAPER No. 28« MISSION SITE. General. characteristic of the river f>-«'»B«^„J°^„!Sl;°*^e another, but these are low. S w"he old Methodist mtosion on the Stoney Indi.« r«ierve. Site. above the river level: this stretch "^^^^^"^fj/XioS ridge, the ground behind the west side the rock outcrop is in the «f,'"f "J.VonK n^^^^^^ ^^^^^ it drops abruptly and then gradually rises *" ^^^g^JS ^^^^^^ rfver the out^ here is the controlling feature of the 8»te ' -the e^^J^° ^ ^y^ ^j rises crop forms the bank of the "ver an^ also of the valley ana gr .^ ^^^^^^ gently away from it. At its southern end the terop aw n ^^^^^ ^^ the general level of the larjr«! flat adjffnt to the river, i. » outcrops the river in the vicinity resembles the ktter S jev^sed tn ^w^ being midway between the two loops. J" the south siae ^ . j banks are verj; high while on the nor hdeth^^^^^ from tlie river in a series of terraces, until an elevatioi^oisom^ ^.^^ ^^ river is reached; these form a bar ^''^^^'^J^T^S steep bank the lower loop beginning at the rock «"tcrop and enaing in a ra y ^^^ at a point about 6,000 feet downstream, measured along the river, iro the two rock outcrops, resting ^gambt the upstream ^"^ »' ^^^ Si,entn„J^ xra%rjii?L?"he7„\'^^^^^^^^^^ could be placed on the banks of the river at the end of the loop. Water Supply. The remarks on the river flow made in connection with the Bow Fort site apply equally to this site. p^^^^^,^^^^. A r*.Hminarv examination of the site revealed the foregoing conditions, and ft ^SThSrfdSfdThat a detailed -vey of th« site n^^ojn^on Xh the general work in the river was warranted, and from this the scheme oi development here outUned has been worked up. 0* DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Briefly, the method settled upon involves placing a dam across the river at tne rock outcrops, together with some necessary embankment on the west side- an mtake structure with controlling devices on the east side; an open cana excavated m the top of the nver terrace referred to; a forebay With racks, over- flow, and entrance to the penstocks; and penstocks to deliver the water the dam°^" situated on the banks of the river almost 6,000 feet below Head. The water will be raised at the dam a height of 40 feet, and will back the water upstream a distance of about i}4 miles to a point above Moriey bridee: between the dam and the outlet from the power-house there is a further fall in the nver of 9 feet, giving a net available head of 47 feet. Dam. The proposed dam is similar to that for the Bow Fort site, hollow and of reinforced concrete. It will be 465 feet long, including spillway and sluice-ways, and from the crest of the spillway to the foundation it will be about 55 feet high, and wiU be founded upon rock. The extra discharging capacity will be provided by means of sluiceways of the same dimensions and type as those at Bow tort site, but on account of the '.idth of the river, no excavation will be necessary; as above, there will be four 20-foot by 24-foot sluice-ways, controlled by Stoney gates, and provided with proper operating mechanism; two 9- foot by 16-foot stoplog openings will also bo provided, together with sluice- way opemngs, through the base of the dam, 72 inches in diameter. The struc- ture wll pass a flood of 50,000 c.f.s. with a 4-foot overtop. K • o QoTl'?"*?^ " ^^^'^%^ ** elevation 3,866.00, normal water level at the site being made sufficiently dose for the purposes of this report, as the flow is nearly the same for all plants, and the heads to be developed are nearly the same. 11 «4 DaPARTMmiT OF THE ISTBRIOB 6 QEORQE v., A. 1915 The equipment at this will be a slight difference in si r e from that at the first plant. The power station would be situated about 100 feet back from the river, at the foot of the terrace mentioned before; the drawback at this point is the lack of evidence of rock in place underlying the heavy gravel which covers the site; on this account care will have to be exercised in securing a foundation for the station. The tail-race will be in the same material, and it may be found necessary to line it with concrete. The head to be developed at this point is 47 feet and, with 1,500 cf.s. expected from the regulated flow, 6,410 b.L.p. can be produced, or 5,770 e.h.p. output at the station. The equipment provides for three units, the turbines each of 3,500 horse- power, with governors, etc.; the electrical equipment proposed is three 2,000 k.w. machmes, with exciters mounted on the shaft of each, and these, together with all switch apparatus, wiring, transformers, regulators, etc., are provided for m the estimates. The power station would also be fully equipped with crane, etc. Except for the difference in the capacity of the installation, the station would be similar to that at the Bow Fort site. The size of the equip- ment has been adapted with the idea that under certain loading conditions two umts could handle the total load on the station under minimum flow con- ditions, giving one unit as a stand-by. The estimated cost of the development, based upon the layout and plans outlined m the foregoing is here given: — Estimated Cost of Plant. MISSION SITE. Main dam and headworks $313,660.00 Canal, including lining 62,000.00 Forebay 23,000.00 Penstocks 35,750.00 Power-house 61 ,000.00 Machinery: Turbines and governors 42,000. 00 Generators and exciters 52,000.00 Transformers and switching apparatus 36,000.00 . Total »625,410.00 J^ngmeenng and contingencies $04 ,690.00 T ^ . . . »720,100.00 Interest during construction $28 ,000 . 00 Grand total $748, 100.00 The total capital cost of the piant, including the proportion of the cost of creation of storage, also the proportion of the cost of a duplicate transmission line to Calgary, and proportion of a tran.sformer station and equipment is:— Capital cost of plant $748. 100.00 Transmission lines and station equipment . . 64 , 700 . 00 Storage 103,000.00 i;:^ . — Total capital cost $915,800 00 BOW BtTXR POWER AJfD aTORAOS 86 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26« The head available is 47 feet, and the regulated flow 1,500 second-feet, resulting in a power output at the station of 6,410 b.h.p. or 5,300 horse-power at the terminals in Calgary. Annual Charges. Assuming a sale of 5,300 horse-power, the probable annual cost per horse- power, based upon a capital cost of $915,800, would be:— 1.— Interest on capital invested assuming financing is done on bonds at 6 per cent sold at par $54,900.00 2.— Sinking fund to retire bonds in 30 years reinvested at 4 per cent, say IJ per cent •,••,• 16,050.00 3.— Depreciation on plant adjusted between general works and equipment to provide for major repairs and re- ,„ _^ ^ newals • • ^ 13,700.00 4, — Operation and maintenance includmg management, superintendence, wages for operators of plant, trans- mission line, receiving station, storage regulation, minor repairs, supplies, and upkeep, etc M,^w.W) Total annual charges $105,300.00 Cost of power per horse-power year delivered in Calgary • • • *io ' ^I « «< " " " on basis of 50 per cent load factor aM.t* « « « k..^. year on basis of 50 per cent load fac- tor, or . 60 cents per k.w. hour 52 . 98 Mimiun Site. Photo by M. C. Hradry. i i 56 DEPARTUBKT OF THE IVTESIOR GHOST SITE. 5 GEORGE v., A. 191S Genehal. the Ghost river for^J^ T^^'^'f '''^'^'■\ ^^ MorleyvUle settlement rofS' theTaflev°^tt'r'^^*^'°"H^^ ^^P '^^^^ valley; ^SreltflorSS unt.l It joms the mam river where the latter cuts throu|hthirro?k outcrop ' Ghost Site. Site. Photo by M, C. Hendry. feet; on the north side the ba^ffrE hX? but' tfnS so'"rbrun\^ '"2 rises from the r v.-r to a flat at the foot of t ho hiRh vairov bank TKU ;« t^ T*" observed on either side the river extends ri^hV nl^ ♦? u j " -"^ ^°''^ "^^^ noticeable fall in the river at this S' ' '""'""^ "^'"^^ " BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAGE 57 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se Development. The scheme proposed is to place a dam across the river at this point, with the rock outcrops as abutments. In this position it will intercept not only the flow of the Bow river, but also that of the Ghost, and this has an important bearing on the scheme, by raising the water to the proposed level, the present road and bridge over the Ghost will be flooded out, making it necessary to relo- cate them; this may be done quite easily by diverting the road north before it leaves the upper level, and an easy grade down to the Ghost river above the proposed flood level may then be secured, also a good crossing point. The road will then follow the new bank of the river downstream until it joins the old road; this route, which is marked out, and may be seen on the plans, will cost very little and will not increase the length materially. The intake will be placed upon the south side of the river, and will give entrance to a canal similar to the one proposed for the Mission site, though not as long. At the lower end will be placed a forebay and penstocks, leading to 11 power station and tail-race. By this means some 6 or 8 feet of fall in the river will be added to the head utilized, for an expenditure which is considered to be warranted. Flow. The regulated flow of the Bow river will be augmented at this point by the flow from the Ghost. The records of the discharge of the latter river do not extend over a lengthy period, only two years being available, but records at other places extending over a longer period, indicate that the winter of 1911-12 was one of low flow, and from the records it is concluded that a minimum flow during the low v/ater period will be approximately 100 c.f.s. This will, with the storage contemplated, give an available minimum discharge at the proposed power site of 1,600 c.f.s. Head. The head it is proposed to develop will be secured by raising the water at the dam to an elevation of 3,812.50 and by going downstream a sufficient dis- tance to get a tail-water elevation of 3,762, or a net available head of 50 feet. This head, together with the contemplated minimum flow of 1,600 c.f.s. will give an output of 7,275 b.h.p. an output at the station of 6,550 e.h.p. Dam. The dam contemplated in connection with this scheme is similar to the two already described in connection with the developments proposed at the Bo^v Fort and Mission sites, i.e., a hollow reinforced concrete dam. The struc- ture will be 450 feet long, including sluice-ways, and about 50 feet high, depend- ing upon the depth of the foundation. The dam proper, will be approximately 300 feet in length, the remainder being taken up with sluice-ways, which will be placed at the north end of the dam. Some excavation will be required, in order that the sills for the large openings may be placed at the required eleva- tions, and provide for entrance and exit for the water; the openings proposed are the same as at other sites, four 20-foot by 24-foot sluice-ways controlled by Stoney gates, and two 9-foot by 16-foot stoplog openings. Access to the north end of the dam will be by means of a passageway through the structure, le.iv- ing a clear spillway 300 feet long; in addition, sluices will be provided through the dam at the south end, controlled by 72-inch valves, giving m all a discharg- ing capacity of 50,000 second-feet., the dam being designed for a 4-foot overtop. w DBPABTMMNT Of TBM niTMRtOR 4* ....,,, . ■ QEORQE v., A. 101S Will 4* Z£i:int i^^^z 2:t^rxi'^,}rr'' « '^' ^ high ground; the latter will be VLTC, Sd S{ f.JSS!S. tiXSl Jl? Intake. Canal. FOREBAT. Penstocks. PowBB Station and Equipment. ;„ *i.''u®P?''®'. "Hi'"" y^ ^'''o ^ "™'Iar *» the one at the Mission site both m the building .tsetf and the equipment. It is proposed to uL thZ JI5o hoSS power turbines with governors, etc., and th?ee 2,000 k.w. gS?era?2« S BOW RXVKK POWER ASD BTORABM » SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26* exciters direct connected as before; also rimilar switch apparatus and trans- former eauipment. ... -i. The size of the units selected has the advantage of leaving a spare unit avMlabie. Two of the turbine units under capacity load are practically equal to the output of the station under low water conditions; under thwe conditions, the generators would be working under a 25 per cent overload, which they could maintain indefinitely; this may be said for aU the developments, the stations being designed with that end in view. Estimated Cost of PiiANT. GHOST SITE. Main dam, including embankments, excavation and unwatering and headworks *^|?'xSxSx Panal /1,UUU.UU ForebaV • 1 7 , 275 . 00 K& 32,000.00 Powe^^ouse.;;...:::: 54,000.00 Machinery: .„ f^^^ r^ Turbines and governors fo'nftnm Generators and exciters oft'^rC^ Transformers and switch apparatus do.uw.uu Total $654,075.00 Engineering and contingencies 98,891.00 $752,966.00 Interest during construction 30,000.00 Grand total $782,966.00 The total capital cost of the plant, together with its proportion of the cost of creating storage based upon the 1,500 c.f.s. flow, also the proportion of the cost of a duplicate transmission line and terminal station with equipment, etc., is as follows: Total cost of plant *"!«'?5^SS Transmission line, sub-station with eqmpment, etc ^ix'tlnlv! Storage charges 109,530.00 Total capital cost $963,073.00 The head iwalable is 50 feet; the regulated flow is 1,500 second-feet, to which must be added 100 second-feet, which is the discharge from the Ghost to be counted upon during low-water period, giving a total of 1,600 second-feet; the power to be developed is, therefore, 7,275 b.h.p., giving an output of 5,900 horse-power on the terminals at Calgary. Annual Chaross. Assuming a sale of 5,900 horse-power, the probable annual cost per horse- power based upon a capital cost of $963,073. would be: — ! i I *0 DEPARTMEyr OF THE lyTERIOR 8 GEORGE v., A. 1915 1.— Interest on capital invested assuming financing is done on bon(U at 6 per cent, sold at par 157 gSS 00 2.-Sinking fund to retire bonds in 30 years, reinvested at *^^'^^^-^ 4 per cent, say \% per cent i fi «7^ nn 3.— Depreciation on plant adjusted between general' works ^'''®'*'"" and equipment to provide for major repairs and re- HCWfllS ....,,,, ■* A Jive e\t\ 4.— Operation and maintemince, ' Jnciuding management ' supgnntendence, wages for operation of plant, trans- mission bne, receiving station, etc., proportion of storage regulation and minor repairs, supplies and upkeep chargeable to income 21 625 00 Total annual charges $110.800~00 Cost of power per h.p. year, delivered in Calgary ig 73 , ^ on a basis of 50 per cent load factor 37 56 per k.w. year on the same basis!!!! i^onQ or 0.57 cent per k.w. hour. RADNOR SITE. General. h„r,t?.^'°''' !l!^ "°Vu^ "i ^^^ ^''°'*' **>«' B«w river flows generally between hieh banks; on the north side they rise to a considerable elevftion above the surface of the river, while on the south side they are not so high rising about 20 to^O feet, and sloping back to the general vallev boundariPsT Thp no^+ =«!• S not contain any direct falls bu't is made u7of swSrpids'and^^^^^^^^ trtSX:tn\l7ri^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Site. thatknoin A?'OTn°„i''-*P»T'P'°'*"T8?^'*'°"°^ ^^^ river settled upon is tnat known as Radnor site" (see reproductions pages 62 and 63), lyina about 3Jf miles below the mouth of the Ghost river. The banks of the me? at the fhTlSr'^H^V^"*^* ^^ ^""* ^P"*' «°d are in the nat^e o ocky cliffs on ^l nn^V ^-A^^t^^ "'^ ^'"°'* perpendicular to a height of about 50 feet • on «W K V'"*^ l^^y ^'^u?"* '° •^'8^' b"t rise about 35 feet and from that Wht tTor t f.«»*ly ^ea» '«-^ Kadnor— I'owcr .Station Sin-, Pmv:£r Station and Equipment. I'lu.iob.v K. H. .Smith. an unobstructed fll of the rteJ L.rthl t!.!!?'"*'''" ■n*'^ ^^^^ ^^^' ^"^ With switchTp^TraTu^^tmnt'lL^e^^ "°""*^' "P°" ^'^^'^ «'^''^*«' *««^ther Tail-Race. shortJHtlfjSvXirf.erng^tctSrV:'' ""*" " '""* "' *^^ «^^*'«"' -" ^« . 1915 IS are of a ble of 10.5 y the Toxi- BOW RIVER POWER AVD BTORAOB 83 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26* Estimated Cost of Plant. RADNOR SITr Main Dam, including excavation and unwatering S 295,000.00 Intake, including excavation, concrete and fixtures 64 ,700. OO Forebay 23,800.00 Penstocks M>11^i!l! Power Station, excavation and unwatering 68,100,00 Machinery: Turbines, governors, etc ** ,uuu. uu Oenerators and exciters 52,000.00 Transformers and switch apparatus "tc 36.000.00 Total * 593,000.00 Eng neering and contingencies 90,750.00 S 683,750.00 Interest during construction 27 ,350. 00 Grand total » 711,100.00 ,nk nd led to ip. •ee ler in n; Radnor Site (From Upstream). Total Capital Cost. Photo by K. H. Smith. The total capital cost of the development includes the cost of construct- ing the plant, the proportion of the cost of creating storage chargeable to the plant on the basis of horse-power developed (b.h.p.) from 1,500 c.f.s. and the proportion of the cost, on a basis of output e.h.p., of a duplicate transmission line to Calgary, together with substation and equipment of a capacity sufficient to serve the four lower plants. It is made up as follows: — 26e— 6J 04 DBPABTMByT OF THE ISTHKIOR i« f r- * , ^. , ' OEORQE v.. A. 101S Cost of the plant TransmisMon line, substation, rtc ' lo'iSS'^ Storage 62,400. 00 96,360.00 Total capital cost S ^^^:i^^ Annual Charges. cJ.«.;l the power develops! wo3" 1« 6 looh h n ,^ • """"""O ««« of 1,600 g"y temin.1. of approxtaaS 5W WpSil™"' '" °''"'"' "" "" «^»'- powe-Jta'S' VoSt.2^iKiTis^"ISot„tt?-!! '"'•"•' «« "»' "»- 3.-Depreciation on plant, adjusted between Keneral '^"•"" aTdtn?wa,r"'P"^"* ^'^ P'''^*''^ ^- major f^^S ^~^.^^^T T^ •maintenance, including management ^^'^^^^ Sbn £'r • ^"«r °^ •"P^'^*"^^ ^t plant'Tans: m ssion hne, tennmal station, operation of storaee mmor repairs, supplies, upkeep, etc., etc T'. 19,600.00 Total annual charges TlW^I^M cS ^r^r' ^' »>o'8e-power year delivered in Calgary $19 25 Cost per horse-power year on basis of 50 per cent load factor ' ^s ' ^n 0^5 59V" °? -'^^'l °^ l« ^' cent^oad factor ''*"'.• ff Is or u- 59 of a cent per k.w. hour. Cascade Power Developmkxt. quest^n" a^raSt*'?! wi^tl^^^^^ ''\A'''V''Z^ ^^^' Minnewanka, the m connection ^th the stom^ptV ^'^"''i ^e feasible to build a power plant sumption .n bS BaS wther '^^^,1 P'?'^"''" ",'"'^^"«''' P«^«' fo' con- developed, lies entire^ within fklK ^ ^^"^ '*?'S«^ ''''""' »°d drainage area as the a/Tairfof the town nrP.!.i°"°I**"5\°^ ^^''^^ Mountains park, and through the Parks ;ranrh DenartZ^nf of'l^^; *^- ^°"j"'°° Government, should ca.Tv out the work- su^vfvT wlr« *^^ i"*^"*''"' *^ ''^"'^ authorities view. • ' ^""^^6X8 were accordingly made with this end in (' "NERAL. lies dfre'ctrSwIhe^uSil^'LtTen^Y:^^^^ '*7 P-^^P^^ /o develop power, forming the outlet of^E' ^inneTAnkl rC""^^ and Devil's creek, the latte; this point is anproxinmtelv 220 ^n^Jl^ -i % arc/i tributary -.0 t'le r.ver at about 6 squares" SegrealHoSon' «J ^ich lake Minnewanka forms altitudes, the entire water suonlv S'. f **"'" basin hes at considerable and glaciers. PP'* ''"'"'"^ ^'""'n mountain stream^ springs, 91S .00 00 00 00 I8t 00 -0 BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAOE •» SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26* At the entrance to the canyon (see rei oson, aiic. jvhich date water will be wasted over the dam. A flow greater thai 50 second-feet is practically assured during part of July, August and September, so that the greatest power would be available during the summer months, when the tourist traffic is greatest and the consequent power load heaviest— a very fortunate combination of circumstances. Available Power. At the instance of the department, provision was made during the con- struction of the storage dan. to use the structure a? a head works for the con- templated power plant below; the dam produces at least half the head to be developed, the other half being due to the natural fall in the river between the dam and power site. As the pond above the dam is primarily for storage purposes, there will necessarily be fluctuation in level; this will not, however, affect the head unfavourably, for the low working head will occur during the winter months, during which period the load will be small. A study of the question of water supply has been made and the conclusions reached have been included in another portion of the report. ■MM 68 OEPARTMUXT OF THE ISTERIOR S GEORSE v.. A. i»t5 i • \ n»nv^ Cmw«. hdm^ r^Mtwrtion '^'"" '**' "■ ^' "-'•'y- BOW RIVEIt POWER AVD 8TORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26« 66 DEPARTMENT OF TUT. IXTBRIOR 900 horse-powe;, of wS&"offi i ]dive,^d°n Ba^*'' T"?^ J'V''* ^«"* consumers. Owing to the loading conditinn«^^a^ 41^/****^, ^°'" delivery to not be utilised continuoX aKpni^ ^ r^r*^A*r" ^"^ °^ 200 c.f^ available, say up to 330 c f s 2nd itls un^ fh?/S™-* ^°'« P^'^H. '""'^ ^^"^^ ^ development is work«l out ^ **"' ^"^^ °' ^°^ *^»t the proposed '^^ruS^^yile^S^^^^ P-Po-d to con- sxpn\^gt\o^Vv:w^^^^ remaincfer to be added a! the Remind w«^^^^^^^^^ «***'°° '"'P^^ty. the Method of Development. Dam. be nltd ^nV^L^Tof'^Lt ?' '""^^^ ^^« -'.productions, page 69) to with meaS for £hardn° wateSheTZr ^''^ TproSded a low level sluice-way cfntroK by a g^^^^^^^ '*°P'°« «P'"^^y«' "^ through f!.^^'^llr1tnV^om^'^,i^^^^^ was, on the instance being made for screens, and a steel thimWp A J^.^ •*°i''^ penstock, provision opening to provide a conSion to the^^^^^^^^ 'P^^^^d in the an elevation that the water mZ h^ArLE^A- T^^ thimble is set at such the water seal on the entra^c^tn tS T" 1°"? '" ^}^ ^"'° ^t^out breaking pointed out that tie p^°^\Tp?ojeV^^^^^^ „i* ^^' «*!««■ 't should bf the cost of the dam, tWmble etc tSnrnhi^Jn "*?*''? ^^^ °^ the thimble; storage. ' ''""""'^' ^^'^' ^^^S charged agamst the cost of creating Penstock or Ft ME. distanc^'e! STt^Z^ratSn:J'6rl^^%'^'' 'rV'°"« *^« ^''^ ^^ - «hort canyon;' the tunnelS b> 7 fS bv IC t^ ™'^ '''°"« the south side of the friction losses, and win conn-ct whh « Itf " fct.on. concrete-lined to reduce provide an unsupp^rtenrsinT of thl^ v^r"'^f • '° ^^'^""^ '^"^ P'*««l «« to river, the steel peLock wUlTorn^nc ofVood Tf.V • P^"-"*' ^*"' "°««'"8 the vey the water tVa point iu"t outHiX thJ^ ' 1 *"* "" ^lamcter, which will con- and generally in cut thon^l, fnl l i the power-house, it will be under pressure carrifd abov^e tr^iol'nroVSon'crS'Se?! «PP--™«tely 150 feet if will^S steel^pi^iXTwhth' thTnte^^^^^^^^ ^- «-foot diameter These branches will be fitt^ Sh TIfveTto .^^^^^^^^^^ ^""'^T'^ *"' branch, will terminate in a bend, Sm u^tKank t„?iw^ ' **" ^^^ ^*^' '*^**°" side of the hill. The tank willWDDrLiZtPlv i9 r'*'"'"^^**"'' ''""t upon the a height as to be above tL hhthLt C S i/J^ 11^""^^ '° diameter, and of such spilling. This tank Jl provWe suSt hidra,^o?'''f "i^*' "^^ 1*^"« P'«^«»t of the long pipe line. "umcient hydraulic regulations m the operation BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26e PowEB Station. The power-house, which will be placed in part of the present nver bed, (see reproduction, page 71), will be of concrete construction, and will be pro- tected on the river side by a wall both upstream and downstream from the Photo by M. C. Hendry. Devil's Canyon Dam (Downstream View). Summer. Photo by M. C. Headry. DevU'i Canyon Dam (Downittream View). Winter. 70 OMPARTMBNT OF THE INTBBIOR poweNhouse. Behind the upper wal the ground will be filled in ..n^Ji 1 space, and acceas to the Banffroad wUl be h«H hvT^,^ i j- "»» affo«J«»g yard up the hiU. oe Had by a .oad leading by easy gradee EquiPUENT. I laii ■^ l»t*TlVlt D^ariMMil af Mw Intariar. Canada ■ Water r»i BOW RFVER POWER AND STORAGE SURVEYS. PROFILE OF BOW RIVER KANANASKIS FALLS to RADNOR .yyt » . |l«.. f |li< lllilMI Ir fiHinlnTi • If 70 power-hoi space, an^ up the hil The* horse-pow exciters nu through t| no step u| Itisp the third < 1 1 *-^^ U H^ Mfc-I » . ^OCMC. MlMiSTCn, fi.cam, CHS otPUTt MtNtSTcn. yfmkr tammr Bnmeli BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAGE SURVEYS PLAN ANDl SECTION OF TYPICAL POWER-STATION jj, au Sc>fa> of IWt. PUATf Vtll PLAN s f 70 P< iu a •Alt o1 "-•T». «»' t*^\ u •Am BOW UVMK POWBK AXD aTOUAOM SESSIONAL PAPER No. 28* CHAPTER VIII. 71 STORAGE. General. In 1909, work was cc >enced upon the plant of the Calgary Power Company at Horseshoe Falls, thougn it was not until the winter of that year that actual gaugings were made of the river during the low water period, and not until the winter of 1910-11 that continuous readings were kept of the dischargt. During January and February, corresponding to the time of minimum flow, fairly complete records were kept; these corroborated the few readings made ♦' e previous winter, and revealed a state of aflfairs that, to say the least, was •larming. These records gave a mean minimum monthly flow of 741 second-feet r the month of February, 1911, and showed that an actual minimum discharge of less than 600 sec3nd-feet could be expected for short periods. The plant built had a turbine installation, capable of an output of 7,600 b.h.p., with provisions to bring it up to 19,000 b.h.p. The situation was, there- fore, a serious one for, under existing conditions, during six months of the year w"»' .ras going to waste, while for the remainder of the year, owing to lack of water, a peater part of the plant would stand idle. The demand for power was ijeanwhile rapidly increasing, the only remedy was storage. By impounding a P^'rtion of the water wasted during the flood stage of the river, the low-water flow could be augmented and the situation very materially relieved; the loss due to idle machinery would then be prevented. %* k Cuoade River Power Station Site. Photo by C. H. Mitchell. ■ i '■. i ■ 1 ^ 1 ^ U I ! 72 UEPAitTUEXT OF THE IXTERIOR „ ^ 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 satrf^tor,-, the le« likely ones boing Irft „nt° thr^MtTe™.„ F^r^k' to Lake Mmnewanka and made a survey of that basin In the summer of 1912, Spray Lake basin was also surveyed and an ev^min unsuitSf '"'■ ^'°"«^ °' -^ """^^^ «^ ^^'l^"*-- «f thTBl:thL" 7>rord' sidered as a regulatmg possibility in connection with plants below the mou^L Devil'a Creek (Old Dam). Htoraoe Basins. Photo by M. C. Hendry. The ba.sins that have been and may be developed are therefore :- 1. Almnewanka lake, (developed). 2. Spray lakes. 3. Row lake. 4. Eliww river 8t<»rBge basin. Lake Minnewanka. was settled upon as aflfording the cheap^-st, most accessible and easiest developed BOW RIVER POWER AXD STORAGE 73 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Storage basin. A survey of lake Minnewanka was made by the Calgary Power Company with this object in view. In the meantime, a policy of con.'^ervation and investigation had been formu- lated bv the Railway Lands Branch, Department of the Interior, which at that time handled matters relating to water-power, regardmg the question of water- Tjower and storage. This l)ranch commenced active work in this t.. ..btain an increased flow for the low-water seas,m..f 1912-13. an.l to .lo tins th.- high-water run-off during the summer of 1912 would n 1 t.. be impoun.le.l; ''^I'^'l'^"" "" the part of all concerned was th.Tefore ne.'essary. pr.mipt action on the j.art ..f the branch in granting li.-ence to the ...mpany to create storage and prompt acti.m on their part in getting to w.)rk. i i i i- „ . f ..„.. The policy the branch Iw.s had in nun.l was the contr..l and buil.hng of anj, storage scheme, but this policy had not advanced to the state where the branch was nrcpar.'d to take up the a.tual construction and control of storage: as the shuation ,lei,.ans.-nt was to the Calgary Power Company the actual building of the necessary works was left to that Company. A.iUKKMKXT OF T)kvki.op.mi:xt. \u iigreein.-nt was thcr«'f..r<' ent.Tc.l into betw.'.'ii the Calgary Power Coinpanv an.l th." .lepartinent, wh.reby the Company wns peri.ntt.-d to create storag.' upon lake Mimu-wanka, subje.t to the .-..ntro ..f the .h^partinent; th<^ amount of st.irage t.. be created, limiting .■levations, discharge, etc. w.-re fixe.l and, further, a clause wiis plac.-.l in th.- agreenunt wh.>reby the w..rk might I..' taken over bv the .le|.artm<"nt at any time .m piiying t.. the c.mipany the .'osi of the work,' as determine.! bv the departmental engineer. 1 he.-*.' iiarticuhir lire set forth in .iausc 17. subsections "(/ ""e" and "j of the agreement, rea.ls as f.ill.iws: ••id) The c.mipanv shall, if re.iuired by the Minister, allow a niini- ii.uin amount ..f water of 1,50 cubic f.'ct per secon.l t.i pass througli the dam, whi.h the Government may use for power puri.oses vyithin the Rocky M..untaius park: an.l the release of such wat.-r tiirough the .tain shall at all times be un.ler the full control of the Minister or p.-rson or persons dulv auth.)rized by iiiin f.)r that purpose. o(p) f},p ,.„mp.iny shall not raise nr re.luce the clevatum of hike points which . DEPABTMEVT OF THE INTERIOR s B QEORGE v., A. 1915 Minnewanka beyond such limiting elevations as the Minister may from time to time determine are suflScient to supply forty-four thousand (44,000) acre-feet of storage. " 0) The Government shall have the right upon giving the company sixty days' notice in writing of the intent to do so, to take over, control and operate the said dam upon the payment to the company of the actual reasonable cost to the company of the said dam and of all work required to be done in the Rocky Mountains park pursuant to said clause twelve (12)." Storage Basin. Lake Minnewanka offered a splendid site for storage, and one capable of very economical development. Situated in the Rocky Mountains Park, and in close proximity to Banff, it required careful treatment in order that its value as a resort for tourists would be enhanced rather than damaged. The lake is the largest to be found in the Rocky Mountains Park, it is 9H miles long, and aver- ages over half a mile in width; the waters are very beautiful, being exception- ally clear and of a very deep blue, and surrounded as it is by high mountains naany approaching 10,000 feet, it offers great attraction to the many tourists thr.t visit the region during the summer. The lake has an area of 5.37 square miles. The banks are generally quite steep, and are for the most part from 15 to 20 feet high, though in places they nse gently to the slope of the surrounding mountains, having a narrow beach at the water's edge. The lake is very deep, and in consequence the shores slope ofl rapidly into deep water. The south shore is heavily wooded for its entire length, while the north shore is clear of timber in many places; the outlet end of the lake is low, a considerable area being but 2 or 3 feet above the original lake level. Devil's creek forms the outlet of lake Miunewanka; it is a little over a mile in length, and joins the Cascade rl -er at the entrance to Devil's Canyon, which is a narrow gorge in the solid rock, about 500 feet long; at the entrance,' this gorge was about 40 feet between rock walls, and 50 feet deep. (See repro- ductions, pages 66 and 75.) About a quarter of ami' - from the outlet of the lake, an old dam existed, which kept the water at lake level, or 4 feet above its for- mer natural level. From the foot of the dam to the mouth of the canyon the fall was 14 feet. A dam placed at the entrance to the canyon would have tx double advantage— the natural run-off of the lake would be stored, and also the discharge of the Cascade river, the lake being used as a storage basin for both. Capacity, After a study of the plans made, it was considered that storage to a depth of 12 feet upon the lake was feasible, this depth meant the flooding of a consid- erable area at the lower end of the lake and in the Cascade valley, rendering necessary the diversion of the rof the replacing of a bridge, the moving of some houses to higher ground am 'so the building of a new dock, with slips for the boats on the lake, all of • h could be done at comparatively small expense. The area of the lake at nonnal level is 3,449.8 acres, and the area within the 12-foot flood line is 4,009.9, thus the area flooded at the lower end of the lake is approximately 600 acres. The storage in round numbers is 44,000 acre-feet. (See diagram, Plate No. 9 for effect upon flow at Horseshoe fulls.) DiBCHAROE. Records of the discharge of Devil's creek and the Cascade river have been taken more or less continuously since 1910. A g.-vuging station was established i PLATt IX \UL BOW RIVFB _*T_ HOUUHOC PAUS »ss: 1913 er«»rtc.f t»h» Minn— «lff ^j omy , „^ i,, ,.t,, ,^ ,..^ by MC.H«ndry,a*ac i i i ( cl a la ag aL m. th Bt( ris at off len of lak a n whi thii duo an I mei faU dou the botl of n erabi necei some for t expei the l: is api (See • B taken LAKE MI 9 far ■ Con«j To moBnm»mni !•- Mil y.tif.rir^l ia VI I PI. ATI X iCE MINNEWANKA STORAGE •tao mcan«4i5i Q!«shM« «£J*9La«s tl4- jth,'! f t. of St orggt -by M.C.H«ndr> . B».ac. . J —M H If t w i' ll M i' § ■ c lO BOW RtVER I'OWEH A\D STOR. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« Wall of Devil's Canyon, Centreline of Dam before Construction. I! I' •■I Photo by H. C. Hendry. *• DEPABTMEyT OF THE ISTERIOR 6 GEORGE V A. 1915 unt? mIv Tfof^ the Irrigation branch in June, 1910, and from that date TaHl rl h' ^^?' ^°nt">"«»« records were kept. Isolated meterings were made of the Cascade during the first part of this period: then in AuKust 1911 a gauging station was established upon it below the mouth of Deal's creek Sdliln'theTeSr^ ^^^"^^'^ "^ *° ''"''«' ''''■ ^" *»>- --<^ - Diagrams. i'*> K ?i\*^® available records, two curves (see diagrams, Plates Nos. 10 and 13) have been prepared by Mr. J. T. Johnston for the department, and these ff?f ir"^"^ 'y "^1''% "" ^'1 "?'*^*' "«« °^- 0^°8 t« the lack of continu: gram, Plate No. 10 is compiled from the mean monthly discharges in sec - fVi°' ^^hP/"°'^/iTo""/' '^".^ *° ''''""^'y- 1913, and shows the^reliLn of the reserved flow of 150 c.f.s. to the monthly discharges. Tables have also been ^v^rl'l** IT connection with these diagran.s. Table No. 11 compilS f om the available data shows when the basin could be filled to fin"th!V' ''"°^"K ^"i: " ^ntinuous flow of 150 sec-feet, and commencing to fill the reservoir on May 1, providing for a storage of 44,000 acre-feet the basin would have been filled by June 24. The surplus run-off (over and above let n^:"- r''"'"-* ^r\ "^ *" D^^cember 31, would amouni to 84,530 acre! it^L T • *^ \ I period, Janui:ry 1 to May 1, the storage is discharged; no attempt is made to show how this would be done, as it defends upon the stage of the Bow river and the necessity of storage. ihn }'\ \^^^' '''^""'j"?.*i'J^ the filling of the reservoir was started May 1, 1912, the total amount of 44,000 acre-feet would have been in the basin by July 1 ?lnrTr?{,? ^^^Tv! ^°'u <=o»tinuous flow of 150 sec-feet; the surplus dis^ up to Septembei 1 m2 *^ '^"""^^^ '^""''^ *"*"""* ^° ^^'^'^^ acre-feet fr«.. ^/k°"^ 1^^ *^°7.*' '* f '". ^^ ^^^ *h^* thei^e i« evidently ample discharge Lts Lfter Sv r t.^^'''''^'/'y%*«"n^" *>" ^'^^•"- ^wing to the influx of tour- ists alter July 1, the mere fact of filling is not the sole requisite, and it is desir- able that the basin be filled as eariy after June 15 as possible, so that unsightly so nplTrtv fin iT?r"? *°. ^'^'^' '* •«,"-'-tain, however, that the basin can be ^LT.u-i .u^ •'"'y 1 °^ T^ y^^"" *''^t ^^^ apprehension need be occasioned that the lake will suffer from the scenic standpoint. I BOW RIVER POWER A\D STORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« TiBLE No. 11. LAUE MINNEW.VNKA STORAGE, RECORD OF FLOW AND STORAQE WITH 150 SECOND- FEET DRAW-OFF. CAPACITY, 44,700 ACRE-FEET. Allowing iSO StcoxD-rHT Continuouh Flow. Month. Mean F1..W. I Flow i p»»«« I Fowor- hoiuc. To fill reservoir. Flow. Quantity in hc re-feet. Surplus Flow. Surplus Flow in ttcre-feet. Remarks. 1811. January Februarj' March April May June 25 June 25-30. . . . July August September. . . October November. . . December. . . 1912. January February March .\pril May June 30 July August 122 101 101 118 245 056 ISO 150 95 806 . 5,811-3 38,859 44,700-3 956 956 642 642 624 624 411 411 226 226 166 166 221 221 149 ISO 85 150 806 492 ! 474 1 261 ' 76 < 16 71 i 9,101 30.252 20,144 15, .'»0 4,673 952 4,366 Started fill- ing May lat. Rew^rvoir filled June 25. 94,018 102 67 301 748 538 638 ISO 150 150 ISO 150 150 151 ' 9,285 598 35,583 44,868 388 388 23,855 I 23,855 I Started fill- ing May Ist. Reservoir filled June 30th. {Note.— The actual capacity of the basin is 44.700 acre-feet; of this amount 44,000 acre-feet has been granted as storage, and it is upon this bavis that the following tables Nos. 11, 12 and 13 are worked ut.) Storage Capacity. The limiting levels for storage created on lake Minnewanka were fixed from the surveys made. The existing normal level of the lake was elevation 4,728.00, though this was not the natural level of the lake, which was some 4 feet lower, but had been raised to the existing elevation by a small wooden dam placed in Devil's creek about oae-quarter of a mile below the outlet of the lake. (See reproduction, page 72.) Thi^ dim waj still in place, and during the winter 1911-12, it was cut and a stoplog opening made; stoplogs were put in place, but could be removed with little labour. The upper limiting level of the lake was placed at 4,740; 12 feet above the existing normal level, giving 16 feet between former normal lake level and the proposed top elevation. The amount of storage available between elevations 4,728 and 4,740 is 44,700 acre-feet, an excess of 700 acre-feet over the amount of storage eranted. 25e— 7 1 OEPARTifBNT OF THE INTERIOB 5 GEORGE v., A. 191S A depth of 0.2 feet in the lake would account for the 700 acre-feet, and as this difference in elevation may easily occur between the lake and the dam, due to storing or drawing down, the limiting elevations were fixed as above. (The effect of this amount of storage upon th' Bow river at Horseshoe falls may be seen by a reference to diagram, Plate Nc .,.) Between elevation 4,728 and 4,724 14,200 acre-feet of storage is available, and this may be made use of in conne*-- tipn with a contemplated Government power proposition on the Cascade river. CoNSTHtJCTION. An agreement was entered into between the Water Power Branch and the Calgary Power Company, and the construction of a dam in Devil's canyon to provide for the impounding of water in lake Minnewanka commenced early in the spring of 1912. Plans were submitted by the Company, and after examin- ation by Mr. C. H. Mitchell, Consulting Engineer to the Water Power Branch, certain modifications and additions were required. Dam. The plans submitted provided for a concrete dam to I placed at the en- trance of the canyon. The dam consisted of a spillway se^,non with four spill- ways and a sluice-way for unwatering, and a deck to act as a bridge, spanning the canyon, and also to be used to carry the winch for operating the stoplocB in the sluice-ways; provision was also made for a fishway, if required. The changes recommended by Mr. Mitchell were made partly from a study of ihe plans, and partly as a result of an inspection of the conditions existing in the ground, these are embodied in the accompanying plani and are as follows- In place of the deep sluice-way on the left of the dam, a penstock opening was pro- vided with the necessary racks, intake piers, stoplog openings, etc. A steel thimble to form the intake end of a penstock 5 feet in diameter was placed this was 12 feet in length, 5 feet diameter at the lower end, and flared to an oval- shaped opening, 5 feet 8 inches by 8 feet inches, so as to give the necessary easy entrance; I-beams were also provided for holding racks. Certain pre- cautions were also recommended and carried out in building. The construction of the dam was an interesting piece of work. The place iK very restricted, and in addition to that, it was necessary to take care of the discharge of lake Minnewanka and Cascade river during construction. To do this, a cofferdam was placed at the entrance to the canyon. A concrete block (see plan No. 17) was first placed at one side of the river bed, the cofferdam extending from the block to the opposite canyon wall; behind this a concrete wall was placed and a flume built with the concrete block as the controlling :yorka, the downstream end being kept at an elevation sufficient to allow the river bottom under the flume to be cleared. The flume was built to provide for a discharge of 300 c.f.s. with a depth of 18 inches (see reproduction page 79). Excavation was carried on behind the cofferdam, and below the flume; the conditions revealed were interesting; the bottom was covered with heavy gravel and boulders to a depth of 8 or 10 feet, and the bedrock was wi.rn into numerous pot holes (sec reproductions, page 79). The section contain- ing the sluice and valve was placed first, the flume was then removed and the ^f**u' ^'VPfted through the sluice-way, the other side then built to the level of the first section; after which the whole was carried to the top elevation at the same time. Large scams existetl in the wall rock (sec reproduction, page 75). Leakage through these was provided against by facing up with cnnfri'te nnd allowing free discharge on the downstream side; possibility of erosion was in- BOW RIVER POWER ASD STORAOE n SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se sured against by the same method (see plan No. 17). The Cascade is a turbu- lent stream and carries much silt and gravel in high water; to prevent any pos- sibUity of th? valve clogging, the concrete cofferdam was left in, and a wall from the cofferdam to the entrance of the (>luice-way was built, thus any material carried by th^ water would be prevented from passing into the sluice-way. ITBwatering Flume. Photo by V. C. Hendry. 25K-7J Putho!** la Caayo* Bottom. Photo hy M. r. H.nilry. t •D DEPARTMENT OF TBE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 The dam was completed in May, 1912. The construction was carried on by the Foundation Company of Montreal under contract with the Calgary Fower Company, and both companies are to be congratulated for the expedi- tion with which the work was carried out and the general appearance of the structure on completion. Cleabino Basin. Simultaneous with the construction of the dam, the work of clearing the margins of the lake and the area within the flood line at the lower end^ the lake, and on the Cascade river was carried on; also such additional work as. removal of buildings, clearing up the new townsite, buUding necessary road diversions and improving the old road, changing the telephone line and build- ing a new wtarf with slips for the boats on the lake. The clearing amounted to nearly 600 acres, a great proportion of the flooded area being very densely wooded, and as the department required careful clearing and low cutting of the stumps, considerable work was involved. A resurvey of the area devoted to summer cottages, and a change in the layout was made, and some additional lots surveyed; the plot was then cleared up, one or two of the streets were graded and the whole was left in good shape. Bridge. The road diversion necessitated a new bridge over Devil's creek; the i» • bridge was considerably longer than the old one and was built entirely of ti' ber, with the exception of the concrete foundation put in to carry the two ma . •cribs. In order that the west end of the lake and the flooded portion erf the Ce • tade river might be used for small pleasure crafts, the under side of the string •ers of the bridge were placed 4 feet above high-water level, giving ample room for boats to pass under. The improvements made, such as new wharf, roads, bridge, etc., are illus- trated in the accompanying illustrations. The work of creating storage on lake Minnewanka was carried out very expeditiously; work was commenced in March, 1912, a dam built in the canyon, over 600 acres of clearing done, a road diversion of 1 mile made and regraded, a new bridge built, a new townsite sur- veyed, and buildings moved out of the flooded area and in some cases rebuilt, 1 mile of telephone line rebuilt, a new wharf built and two slips provided, to- gether with a marine railway for each, all of which was completed by the Ist of July. The storage of water was commenced on June 1, 1912, and the level was raised to 4,740 by August 12; the storage could have been completed much ear- lier, but was held back by the. progress of the clearing, so that flooding did not begin until the uate given. Power in Connection with Storaqe. Lake Minnewanka is 8 miles by road from the well-known mountain resort, Banff, the visitors to which are rapidly increasing in numbers. This town is the principal place in the Rocky Mountains park, and from here many camping parties enter the mountains. As a place where people may spend the summer either at the hotels or in summer cottages, it offers many attractions, and in passing it might be mentioned that three times as many people visited Banff during the summer of 1911 as visited the famed Yellowstone park. With this increued population, the necessity of power for lighting streets and houses has also increased; at present the power is supplied from the Bankhead mines, which is ''• miles from Banff, on the road to Minnewanka; no franchise has been gi^ , the street lighting being done by yearly contract. i B 3 t LAKE M Proc»«> for m corn :Y//:iiiM'. \ I k. I i| Wa4>- (^-lab^ for ^nfr ^naoMs /yy//)i,yy/.'X'y.-A')cryy'.'A1 :■■/'.■'/,> !%< yyy/^y.y/)^yyA')^'yyA')^yy'.'A1 ■■/'.■'//.\ -■;/;^.rt'< -<-.i.: ^ r.ij I go(^ Vrrft. ^ira . V II I II II il iiiupjiii ,\, i70CA:r.lR \ ■1 ■^ i PCATC XI lKE miknewanka storage ±a-Pig±ar g* ■" AerB-P— t.fromJ«n.l9ll to AjlK 'iJ alao rpca«*_ef_-?!iii!og_S.«9'-ax-SJ!d Ksii^^ng ar ■ conafn t Di»char^; « of ISO S;~;-^»p.oY r»n ort on Po«f «r»d a tcra^ ln»«»tH«tioo by MCHandry, a».ae. i n h fat w •« ui tw foi M M # r R rai BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA0B 81 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e The park and town are under the Dominion Government control through the Parks Branch, Department of the Interior. Under the conditions existing, it was considered that a power plant oprated by the park authorities would be a good thing; the feasibility of producing power in connection with the storage in lake Minnewanka was looked into, and the conclusion was reached that such was possible. Provision for the utilization of the storage dam as head-work« of the power scheme was therefore secured, and the plans show the method of making use of the storage dam as an intake for the plant. Utilization of Flow for Power from Extra Storage. In connection with the storage of water in lake Minnewanka, when the agreement was made with the Calgary Power Company, granting them the right to store water in the lake, a clause was inserted whereby the department reserved the right to a continuous flow of 150 second-feet, to be used for development of power or other purposes; in addition, the company was required to so modify the design of the structure as to permit of it being made use of as head-works for a power plant, the construction of which the department had in mind. The discharge data in this connection is interesting, and some of the diagrams included are to illustrate the utilization of the water discharged from storage for that purpose. In making use of the water in such a manner, a continuous flow is necessary, and in making provision for 150 cf.s. continuous flow it was not the intention to work a hardship to the company, as there might be occasions when it would be advantageous to conserve the storage as much as possible. Having in mind this point, an investigation was made as to the effect o. the department making use of 4 feet extra storage, not by raising the lake an extra 4 feet, but by drawing it down to a lower level ; by this method, 14,200 acre- feet could be made available. The diagram shown on Plate No. U, together with Table No. 12, compiled by Mr. Johnston, was plotted with this object in view; these are self-explanatory. The basin, as in the other case, is assumed empty May 1, 1911, but at the lower elevation 4 feet below normal lake level; deducting the 150 cf.s. reserved from the mean monthly flow, it is found that the reservoir could have been filled by July 1, 1911, or 58,900 acre-feet could be stored. From then until December 31, 1911, 80,071 acre-feet would be wasted, over and above the 150 cf.s. discharge. During the interval of low water, i.e., with less than 150 cf.s. discharge, from January 1 toMay 1, 11,699 acre-feet would be required from storage, to make up the flow to loOcf.s., or less than the extra storage secured by K wering ihe basin 4 feet below normal lake level. So that, had it been necessary o utilize the storage at other than the time it was required by the Calgary I'ower Company, it would still be possible to pay them back out of the department's reserve. The method of emptying the "basin is indeterminate, but filling is again commenced (at the low level) on May 1, 1912, from which date to August 30, the limit of the data, some 33,850 acre-feet, was wasted, after allowing for the 150 cf s. discharge calleu for. In this scheme, as in the other, no detrimental effects are to be expected from the slight delay in filling che basin, as by July 1 only the top rim of the lake would be exposed. It will be noted in examining the tables that the total storage capacity ot the basin is given as 44,700 acre-feet for the 12-foot storage and 58,900 foet for the 16-foot storage, and that only a run-off of 44,000 acre-feet has be<'n granted; this is to provide for some leeway in regulation. Utilization or Flow of 200 Second-feet with Extka Storage. The scheme was then extended a little further, and diagrams and a table prepared on the assumption of 200 cf.s. continuous run-off. The diagram, Plate ■ i I i 5 - I tt DEPARTUmiT OF TBE IXTERIOK 5 GEORQE v., A 1915 No. 12 and Table No. 13 cover thia case. Beginning at the samp timo a«^ bf fiffby" d^°12. t JS*^ '^^1 'IT- ^^'"^ -™al Ivel Ire^vroodd DenuedbyJulyl2; 58,180 acre-feet being stored from then until October 31, Lake Minnewanka Storage. Record or Flow and StorIg'^'' wm^' A 150 SEcoNi>-rEET Draw-off. Capacity 58,900 Acre-feet Month. Hwn flow C.f.8. 1911. January. . . February. Mareh April May June July M. July 6-31... August September. October.... November. December. . 1812. January... February. March April May June July 1-18., Julylt-Sl. Auipnat AiLowiNo ISO SncoND-nrr coshni'ous flow. Flow I Pow«r. ^" f*" reservoir. ; „ , _ stXn. : Surplus ^unjlus ; p^g, ., Deficit Rcniark.ichtme is now on foot to remedy this. Another adverse influence was the formation of ice in the bed of the Cascade river, and overflow of the valley. This condition existed to a very marked degree between Bank- head and the junction with the Bow, for as is the case with all rapidly flowing open streams during extreme cold weather, large quantities of frazil ice was formed in the Cascade; this ice formed blockades, dammed back the river, flood- ing the flats where the water was turned into ice. Nearly the whole of the section referred to was covered with a sheet of ice, extending across the valley. In {tlaces this ice field was two or three hundred yards across and of a depth of 3 eet. Where the valley was more confined, the sheet was not so wide, but was as much as 7 feet thick (see reproductions, pages 19 and 25). No doubt, the formation of anchor ice had something to do with the flooding, but frazil appears to have been the greatest cause, coupled with other conditions. From a study of the discharge curve of lake Minnewanka during the winter, together with the temperature curve for the same period, the following con- clusions have been drawn. During the periods of comparatively mild weather, little water was flowing in the river, the channel became very much restricted and clogged with the ice margins and hard auow. Directly a cold snap came, a considerable quantity of water was releasid, frazil formed, and blocked up the restricted channels, the flats, overflowed and froze, causing ice fields. From an examination of the other streams in the vicinity, this explanation is apparently confirmed, because little evidence of overflow and ice formation existed at the end of the reason. The normal flow apparently did not have the same effect as that of a regulated stream where little water flowed during normal, and large quantities during severe weather. It is expected, in view of this, that with a plant in Cascade below the dam, and a consequent continuous flow of considerable volume, little difficulty will be experienced from ice after the plant is installed. The loss of water due to ice formation in the stream is rather a loss of regula- tion than actual loss of water, as nearly all eventually becomes available during the latter end of the low-water period, the ire in the streams disappearing long before the high-water period. SPRAY LAKE AND RIVER. General. The Spray river, one of the largest tributaries of the Bow west of Calgary, joins that stream in the Rocky Mountains park, at Banff, just be'.ow the Spray falls on the Bow. Flowing from the south, it enters the Bow valley l)ctwe<'n mount Ruiiiile and Sulphur mountain; it is between 40 and 50 miles lt»ng from source to luuuth, and has a drainage area of 310 square miles. About 8 miU-i above the mouth, the river branches, one branch, the east antl smallest, flows from the valley between mount Rundle and CJoat mountain. The west branch comes down the val!<>y on the other side of the (^loat range. The fall in the river is fairly regular, about 40 feet per mile, the valley is very narrow and the banks are very high and precipitous. From the junction up- stream for about 17 miles, this branch flows through a narrow valley between the Ooat range and the range to the west, and the total drop in the distance is 750 feet. In this stretch there are very few creeks of any size coming in; the pomibility of po.trer has not been investigated, but it is quite possible that a limited amount, such as that to be develoi^d on the Cascade in connection with the storage at lake Minnewanka, might be developed. BOW RirER POWER AXD STORAGE ■» SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e At the end of this stretch of the river, it breaks up into three branches, the main branch from the south, one which forms the outlet of the bpray lakes and Hogarth creek. (See reproduction, page 95). *u i n u The principal branch is from the south. About 5 miles above the lakes it divides into two branches, one to the east heading on the main continenta divide in a small lake, and the other from the west having its source in a small lake under mount Assiniboine. The fall in these two branches is considerable, but no records are available as to the slope. Hogarth creek is rather small, and flows between the Spray and Kananaskis ranges, heading on the divide between the Spray and Kananaskis rivers. Photo by K. H. Smith. Spny River Canyon (Lookinc Upftnam). The Spray lakes, three in number, lie to the north of the river. They are connected with it by a stream about half-a-mile in length, which enters just below the mouth of Hogarth creek. The lakes lie in the mam valley between high mountains, and are connected by small streams. The lower and larnest lake is 301 acres in extent, and lies at an elevation of over 6,000 feet, given on the maps as 5,396, but assumed for purposes of survey at 5,260 feet. The II 86 DEPARTMENT OF TBtl INTERIOR H 6 GEORGE v., A. 1918 "econd lake, which is 37 feet higher than the first, is 143 acres in extent, and the third has an area of 17 acres, and is 3 feet higher than the second lake. The total area of the lakes is 461 acres. Spray River Cuyon (looking down itream) Reconnaisance. Photo by K. H. Smith. A m-onnuisiiuce was made of these lakes in July, 1911, but it was not until ■ u c ij' *''"* ""^ ^"'''' ^""^ ''""^ *'^*""®- ^^ ***** *'™® * ^™*" P'^'ty was put in the field, consisting of an engineer and two assistants, a cook, ami a packer with a pack tram. The surrounding country, . while wooded to a considerable extent, i« fairly open, the timber being generally dry, and standing, permitting the use of a plane tal)lc, by which method the whole valley was developed. The reconnaifsance revealed the fact that the general topography of the country surrounding the lakes lent itself to the creation of storage. The main branch of the Spray at this point comex from the south, is joined by Hogarth creek from the east and the outlet of the lakes from the north ; and at the junction of these creeks a wide valley is formed. About one-quarter-of-a-mile from the lower lake, just below the junction of the branch from the lakes and the main stream, the nver leaves the valley through a narrow canyon, the walls of which BOW RITER POWBB AKD BTORAQM SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« «re of rock formation, covered, to a greater or less extent, by soil and detritus, «ad are wooded. These walls rise on a slope of not less than 60°, to a height of at least SOU feet, the rock outcrops being nearly perpendicular for a great por- tion of their height. (See reproductions, pages 85 and 86). This ccnyon extends downstream about a mile, the stream filling rapidly; the width at the water level U from 60 to 150 feet, and at an elevation of 150 feet above the water, between 400 and 450 feet. There is evidence of rock above this point, and on the south side an outcrop appears at an elevation of over 160 feet above water level, and extends up and down stream as far as was examined. The rock on the south is of limestone formation, and appears to dip towards the south, and is overlaid to a considerable depth with a glacier deposit. On the north side the rock resembles a sandstone formation, the valley having been formed apparently in the fault between the two formations as on the north side the dip is practically vertical; the rock rises higher, and is overlaid to a greater depth than on the south side, the outcrop appearing at least 200 feet above the level of the water. The conclusion reached from the reconnaissance was that, by placing a dam in this canyon, as near the mouth as practicable, considerable storage could be developed in the basin behind. Survey. The survey made of the basin in the summer of 1912 was made with the object of verifying the conclusions reached in reconnaissance. The work was done as rapidly as possible by plane table, and with a degree of accuracy commensurate with the object in view. Special attention was paid to the canyon, which was contoured with care, with the object of locating several dam sites, all rock outcrops, etc., were located in order that fairly close estimates might be made of the probable cost of control structures. ^ A careful study was made of the canyon at the time the survey was com- menced, and it was decided to make the 5,300 feet contour (lake level, 5,200), the limiting elevation, as far as the structure in the canyon was concerned, though it was not certain at the time that this would not lead to difficulties in other parts of the valley. With this in mind, the contours were developed by the plane table, particular attention being given to the 5,250, 5,275 and 5,300 contours, though sufficient information was taken to develop the intermediate ones at 10 foot intervals. ; The method pursued was to run traverses with the plane table, making use of two rod men, sometimes the packer was pressed into service. Vertical angles were read. No attempt was made to follow out a contour by horizontal shots, but by controlling all the changes in the ground, and sketching, on the ground, the country was developed. Frequent checks were made to eliminate errors. When the sheets were finally assembled, it was found that the traverses closed well within the permissible error for such work, and frequent checking for elevation exhibited the same condition. In referring to this basin it seems well to draw attention to this method of survey. Where the country is of such a nature that control of the ground may be had, there is no doubt that the plane table will give result" quite accurate «nough for preliminary work and if extra care is taken, results may be obtained upon which final estimates for the creation of storage may be based. The personnel of the party has been given before, but is repeated: one plane table man (engineer in charge), two rodmen, one handy man, one packer, and eight pack horses; on moving days the handyman acted as packer, and at odd times he P 88 DaPABTMirST OF THE IJITERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 cooked and, when the party was working in timber, he acted as axeman. This party operated 30 miles from the base of supplies. Including the time of moving m and out, and actual work in the field, but excluding the cost of the work of the chief engineer, the work was done at a cost of 25 cents per acre, which, considering the value of the data secured, is very reasonable. Area and Capacity. The area contoured was roughly eight and one half miles long and three- quarters of a mile wide, giving inside the 5,300 contour, an area of 3,024 acres. This includes the three lakos in the valley and also the falls on the main branch of the river. The area inside the 5,275 contour is 2,429 acres; inside the 5,250 contour, the area is 1,755 acres; and inside the 5,220-foot contour the area is 729 acres. The quantity of water that could be stored below each contour is 171,129, 102,829, 49,986 and 11,880 acre-feet, respectively. A curve giving the contents of the basin at each foot of elevation shows that the storage capacity mcreases much more rapidly at the top of the reservoir than at the bottom. This curve, which is remarkably regular, emphasizes the advantage in storage capacity to be gained by raising the control works as high as possible. The assumption has been made in this report that the basin will have its upper level at 5,300, giving, in round numbers, a total storage of 171,000 acre-feet; of this amount, 160,000 acre-feet has been made the basis of all calculations, the remainder it is assumed being dissipated as evaporation or otherwise. if' Discharge. The gauging station on the Spr-jy river, established in July, 1910, is located about 100 yards above the junction .fith the Bow, and in consequence the total discharge of the river is measured at that point. The records have been kept contmuously since the establishment of the station, except for the month of November, 1910. The only stream of consequence entering the Spray between the gauging station and the lakes, is the branch coming in at the end of Goat mountain; the discharge from this stream forms, however, but a small proportion of the total flow. The river heads for the most part in the glaciers and snow fields of the summit range, so that it is safe to assume that fully three-fifths of its discha-ge comes from above the entrance to the canyon, near the Spray lakes. The results of the gaugings are tabulated and included with data of a like nature. A diagram (see plate No. 5) shows graphicallv the mean monthly dis- charge of the river over the period recorded. The discharge for the period, October 1, 1910, to October 1, 1911, excluding November, 1910, is 398,687 acre- feet; it may therefore be assumed that the discharge was well over 400,000 acre-feet for the whole period. The records do not extend over a sufficient period to enable any definite conclusions to be drawn, but the amount of water avail- able for storage during the high-water period is estimated to be about twice that of t.he capacity of the storage basin. From the discharge tables it will be seen that the minimum mean monthly discharge for the period recorded w«. i08 c.f.s. in March, 1912. The maximum mean monthly flow was 2,011 c.f.s. in June, 1911. The absolute minimum daily flow recorded was 75 c.f.s. on March 29, 1912, and the maximum daily discharge was 2,840, June 18, 1911. It is interesting to note that the period of minimum flow is apparently during the month of March rather than February, as in the other streams, but whether this will always hold true, and the reason for it, is not apparent. BOW RIVER POWER AVD BTORAOS SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« ^^ ■ — -T I — Contents 15000 AcFt. - 1 inch \ Contents Curve Spray Lake Storage Basin To accompany report on Power & Storage Investigations by M.C Hendry. B.A.Sc Jan. 1913 \ \ \ i \ \ \ ) \ \ \ ^ 1 I L \ i \ 1 \ 1 " 1 I v 1 \ 1 I — \ \ V \ OU«»l \ i i "v. ^ 2 i qoui 1- ■*iOS •J no)u03 s 3 i t 5 i i n 90 ISI DtPAKTMBNT Or TUB IVTBEWB Storaqk Operation. B QEORQE v., A. 191S Another diagram, Plate No. 14, has been prepared showing certain con- ditions of filling and emptying the storage basin baised upon the recorded discharge of the river. In this connection it was necessary to make some assumptions as to the amount of water to be discharged during the operation of filling the reser- voir, a discharge of 316 c.f.8. was therefore provided for, and the length of time necessary to fill the reservoir, and the amount of water wasted in excess of this flow was computed. It has been anumcd that during the high-water period of 1910, the reservoir was filled; at the be^nning of November, water was first released from storage and added to the mean monthly flow. The distance of the basin from auy point, other than one on the Spray river at which the water could be used for power purposes, is great, so any attempt at close regulation would be futile. It would only be possible to regu- late upon the basis of a continuous flow of the Spray river itself, and it is upon this basis that the diagram for the stream has been compiled. Assuming that the intention is to augment the flow of the Bow river during the months in which low water occurs, would mean a flow from storage during six months of the year or from November 1 to May 1. With 160,000 acre-feet of available storage, a continuous flow of 446 c.f.8. could be maintained, adding the mean inonthly flow of the river during these same months, and assuming that a con- tinuous uniform flow is maintained, it would be possible to secure a discharge of 635 c.f.8.; making the same assumptions, and using the same reasoning, during the low-water period, 1911-12, 607 c.f.8. would be the continuous uni- form flow for the period. On the assumption that a flow of 316 ci.s. is being provided during the storing period, and that filling the basin commences on May 1, it is found that for the year 1911 the basin could have been filled by July 23, 171,000 ncre-feet being stored. From the time of filling to the time of commencing to discharge from storage, 64,937 acre-feet would be wasted in excess of the flow of 316 c.f.s. provided. From the year 1912, su£5cient data are not to hand to compute the time of filling and the amount of waste. Creation op Stobaoe. The best storage scheme in the Bow basin is undoubtedly that at the Spray lakes, though the proposition is not an easy one. The amount of additional water that could be made available would form a considerable percentage of the present low flow. The size of the structure involved is great so that considerable care and thought will have to be exercised in the final design and construction ; it is quite possible that if the proposition is undertaken, the general scheme as advanced now will require modification in many ways. With the information that is now available it is, however, considered that the creation of the amount of storage assumed is feasible, from both an engineering and economic stand-point. Type o» Stbucture. The estimates for the cost of creating this storage basin are based upon the design of a hydraulic-fill type of dam. Htdraulic-Fill Daub. The hydraulir -fill tjrpe of dam belongs essentially to the western mining districts, especially California. It was in connection with the mining operations carried on there by means of sluices and hydraulic giants, or "monitors" that m.ATC.XIV "A ■eii«v." A hydraulic-fill dam' wouW reduce the amount of material to t>p transported to a minimum. The amount of material to be placed in the structure is greatlv in excess of that for :i concrete dam, but there is no citmparison In'tween tlie unit co«t for the methods, there being cfrntracts on record where the price for this kind of work has Ijeen 18 cents per cubic yard. ►•' Mr. Schuyler, in his paper (vol. LVIH, Trans. Am. Soc. C.E.) quoted before says regarding this method : "While economy in first cost is certainly a most potent factor in governing the choice of methods of doing any work, it is by no means the only reason which has leerionty as consisting largely in the ability afforded to utilize materials which would be otherwise unfit or unsuitable due to the a.ssort- ing, grading and separation of different classes of material, bv reason of the dissolving action of moving water and its varying velocitics,which are entirely controllable, and which permit the deposition of the several grades in making a stable dam. Bv this means, the course, friction- beanng stable materials may be placed on the exterior slopes, and the fincT particles may be assembled in the centre of the mass to serve as a puddle core, and the ease and simplicity with which this may be done constitutes one of the stningest pofwible re.isons aside from that of economy in cost, for using this method. In fact, by this process it becomea practic- BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAQB m SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se able, with care and skill, to build a safe and stable dam of materials which would otherwise be considered valueless. As nature does not always mingle her materials in the proper proportions to make them fit for forming a water-tight embankment without proper segregation; this selection and separation cannot usually be made by the ordinary process at practicable cost." Construction. The first consideration in construction of this kind, is the question of water supply under pressure. This is obtained in one of two methods— either by meanp of a gravity supply at an elevation above the work suflBcient to insure a good working pressure, or by pumping; the former method is the cheaper. The pressure is, of course, of prime importance, and as a rule at least 100 pounds per square inch is required with a discharge up to 20 cubic feet per second. Where the supply of water and the pressure is secured bv pumping, power has to be secured. At this site, so far as is known, there is no adequate gravity supply of water available; it is therefore proposed to obtain the required supplj- of pump- mg, a method for which the site is well adapted. Power for Construction Purposes. At the upper end of the basin, and in the main branch of the river, there is a fall with an available head of 50 feet. The flow varies, but during the season when sluicing could be done, the amount available would be between 150 and 200 second-feet. When the basin is filled, the fall will be drowned out, but during construction it would be available for power. It is proposed to install a temporary power plant at this fall. This could be done very economically, a^'l such a plant would supply all the power necessary for the construction of the dam; the fall is about a mile and a half from the site of the proposed work so the transmission lines would be short. Altogether, the site seems peculiariy adapted to this type of construction. Dam. The dam would occupy the same position as of that proposed for a iiiiiMinry (lam. I.e., about 2,500 feet from the mouth of the canyon. It would be 380 feet long on top and 30 feet wide, and from foundation to crest, the total height would be 100 feet. A design has been prepared of the structure, and quantities estimated. The upstream slope i<« 3 to 1, and the .lownstream 2 to 1. Riprapping is also included for each slope, but owing to the material this may \>e found to ]te unnecessary. A rock toe is proposed at the up and e 2:1 Contents ; ; ; ; ;55o,'0OO cubic yards. iunnci: I'ength 900 feet. Section 1,548 square feet. Maximum estim.-tted flood, 20 c.f.s., per square mile 4,000 c.f.s. The cost of the dam itself has been based upon the above figures. BOW RIVER POWBR AND 8T0RA&E 95 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 28« Clearing. wateJ"8«rS^' r* *" ''? ^"1**^ '' ^'^24 acres. W thi.. amount, 464 acres is JiS£r!etJ '•«™'"n<^«' '>'"»K ^«vered to a greater or less extent with Spi»y River (above Canyon U Taken by K. H. Smith ,«.. *t ^*'' '"'"i -?' *"' '"»"<•■>■ '" th.> l)asin has Ix-en burned (.vpr (see repro- duction page i.o but not mnpletely, leaving the trunk/ standing, the heaviest staiul of dry timber occurs between the lak.'s and the south end of in,..„ •'"•,''. *"■ '""K' 1^'"«''^'>- J'xkpine, running from 16 inches to 20 inthes in diMineter, and fairly straight ; a second growth of jackpine has appeared, but it is l„r the most part small, though thick in places. The part lying above the junction with Hogarth .reek is fairly clear: the part l)etween the mouth of the canyon and the proposed dam site has been well covered with jackpine, but a consi plans ,.f the area, and in estimating the cost 1 . ? storage u L i W DEPARTUEVT OF THE jyTERWR ^, 5 GEORQE v., A. 1815 the cost of clearing has been included. No attempt has lieen made to senarate t5ta?^rLT^ ^T **»« ti°^bered, estimates being made ^ th™ bLis thiifhe total area not under water, i.e., an area of 2,560 acres, is to be elearX Trails. .^^y^l^^f creation of storage at Spray lakes, it will be necessary to relocate aTe ;Sl t unL JrhiJ^^'hT* "IT*' '^' ^f " ^'P°« '^' ^««* sWeVthe K Whtrwo ' ""^'8*"To«d. but a change of location of the trail coming from White Man s pass at the upper end of the valley will be necessary Sso of tZ trail leading from the lakes to mount Assiniboine It wUi b^ n^^sar? to locate a new trail around the east side of the basin leading to Kan^nS Take and ud Hogarth creek, also around the south end of the basin, b3hS off from the Spray Lskr. Photo I.y K. H. Smith. Tkmhorary Power Plant. The Spray falls, which will i>e floo«l.>d out when the storage basin is created has a direct drop of 40 fr,.t: immediately ah..ve the main fall arc a series of m BOW lilVKK /'Onc/f AM) SrOltA(;E ff SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« ?rjJlilabllT«H luT •"'*'' ''"i^at by going upstream a few hundred feet if *^"'*'*'f head could be increased to 50 feet. There are a number of noints where the stream flows over the exposed rock and at one of the" olaces the "Ztmf^uZlT-''''''^ ^^ " ^^'^P""'^ ^'"^ acrosTthe strS,Kructirl fcondi??i^wt'"^°*'MTy- In ""-der that this head may be obtained, ^n n J'TJf V«"*^ would be necessary; this could be an open flume. DossibVitUnlifl ?*"'*'*" .°^*'""'!'P°'?^*J°""*> be reduced as much as possiWe, It IS proposed to use two units of about 400 b.h.p. each. An estimate fhed^" "''*' "^ '^' P™^"^'" ''°«* °^ *^'« P'«°*' ^"<1 •"^•"^^d in the co" o? The- gross available head for the plant is 50 feet, and the estimated dis- charge during the working season 200 c.f.s.; this is taken in plaoe of the lo^- he Hnn^*)}'*'"*!**'*' exception of work on the sluice tunnel, little work could be done during the winter months. S?^t 50 f,.^^ ^'f*»a^8^' 200 •' ti.h.p gQ^j Proposed installation ..:.::;.;; '2—400 h.p. turbines. 2—225 k.w. generators Construction Road. Besides the construction of the dam and other preliminary construction o2H.'"n'I'tK''''"i^%"r'l"'yf° ^"."d in the neighbourhood of 20 mi es of wagon road; of this, about 7 or 8 miles will involve considerable grading, the remainder &RT/r^.^-'^ T^ of construction. At pre.sent there exfs'ts a go?d road frZ fhtr!*h ^ junction of the two branches at the end of the Goat mountain from there the best route for a road to the lake follows up the north branch and nto the valley by the north end of the lakes. The part from ?he en of Banff construction ' '"'* "^ ^^'*^ ^*^°'' P""^ ^'""'^ ^ *^« '"^^t difficult of Estimated Cost of Creating Storage. 1. Roads, camps and telephone $25 000 00 2. Temporary' power plant (800 h.p.) SO^OOOOO f t-xcavations and preparation of foundations, etc.. . . 40 000 00 4. hluice tunnel and control works 117 ooo 00 e' R"™' ^^'^^^ ^"Wc yards, complete 165 000 00 6. Clearing of basin, 2,560 acres 38 000 00 7. Contingencies of construction 41 '500 00 8. Engineering and Inspection 28 000 00 9. Interest during construction, etc 29'50o!o0 '''°*"' 1!514 ,000.00 *^ost $3 per acre-foot. BOW LAKE STORAGE. General. Bow lake at the head of Bow river is at an altitude of nearlv 6 500 feet above sea-level, ami may he considered the source of the river. On the south side of the lake the mountains rise from the water's edge from 2,500 to 3 000 feet • DBPABTMBNT Of TBE IHTgKIOK 5 GEORQE v., A. 191S but on the north and east sides the slope is gentle, the valley wide, and the moan- tWM not so high- About 3 miles to the north west of the lake, is Bow pass at an eleration of 6,870 feet, forming the upper limit of the Bow basin. The mountains to the south and west of the lake are for the most part per- petually snow-capped, immense fields of snow lie upon the top of Bow peak, mount St. Niebolas, and others in the vicinity; these feed the two glaciers that (UMbarge into the lake. These two glaciers are the famous Crowfoot and Bow ^ers. (See reproduction page 99.) The former is the smallest and Ti. .t" r ' °f"^»°8 »t8 naine ^rom the form it takes; it enters from the «)utb, the foot of the glacier being within a hundred yards of the lake shore Bow glacier lymg at the west end of the lake is much larger; the foot is one mile from the shore, the intervemng distance being filled up with the debris from the glacier or moraine; over this the creeks from the forefoot find their way ; i Ahea. The lake is approximately 3 miles long, from east to west, and varies from a quarter of a mile to neariy a mile in width. (See reproduction page 98.) The lower portion about 100 acres in extent being 3 feet lower than the upper pttrt and connected with it by a creek of conjiderable width, from 100 to 200 yards wide. The total area of the lake is 800 acres and the area tributary to it roiiehly 30 square miles; lying as it does at a comparatively high altitude, the drainage uea IS pecuhar. The surrounding mountains are classed among the high peaks. Bow peak bemg shghtly over 9,000 and the majority over 10,000 feet! Under ^se circumstances, it is to be expected that the run-off will occur to a great extent during the warmer part of the summer. Information as to the time of ice formation on the lake in the fall is not available, nor the approximate date on which the ice leaves the lake. Bow I«k»— Lookiac Eut. Photo by H. C. Headry. BOW RIVBR POWKB ^JfD BTOKAaa «§ 8E68I0NA1. PAPER No. 28« Invistioation. In the summer of 1911, when a general reconnaissance was made of the Uow basm, m the search for possible storage sites, Bow lake was included. After a general mvestigation of the lake and its surroundings and a rather careful «XMunation of the outlet, it was decided that a survey in greater detail was justified. Accordingly a party was sent up to the lake in August, 1911. Owing to tbe difficulty of transportation, and distance from the nearest base of sut^ pUM, Banff, It was decided not to survey the lake in any great detail but to work up thoroughly the outlet end of the lake. BowLiUu T I.. ^ ... Photo by M. C. Hoidnr. -Looking Eut and (bowing lea Fidd •bove Crow Foot Olaciw. A Stadia traverse was run around the lower part of the lake, also around the upper part for part of the distance; the traverse was confined to one side only, points being located at frequent intervals on the opposite side by stadia and triangulation. Cross sections were taken of the banks of the lake at every station, with hand level and tape, and the shores of the lake contoured for a height of thirty feet. The outlet end of the lake was worked up in greater detail, a complete atadia survey being made and two dam lines located. In addition a couple of test pits were dug, revealing a very compact boulder clay overlying the rock in the vicinity of the dam site. Storage Capacity. The accompan>-ing plans were plotted from the surveys made. A study of them revealed the fact that the height to which the water in the lake might be raised was governed by the height of the ridge of land to the north of the lower lake; this is at an elevation above 6,530, but in places drops below that «levation; by building a short embankment, however, the water might be raised to 6,530. This was therefore fixed upon as the upper level of the storage, the lower level bdng the present normal lake level. 100 DtPABTKSNT OF THE ISTKRIOR in * S GEORGE v., A. 1»1S The amount of storage secured by raising the water to elevation 6,530 is 27,411 aore-feet, equivalent to a discharge of 466 c.f.8. for one month of thirty- one days. SuL'HCEH OF Water Supply. The lake is fed from a number of sources, the two principal ones being the Bow and Crowfoot glaciers. The former discharges into the upper lake at the west end; the stream flowing from the glacier varies in size with the tempera- ture; where it enters the lake it breaks up into a number of small streams, which at time of examination would aggregate about 50 c.f.s.; this was visible discharge, but owing to the nature of the underlj'ing material the underflow must bear a large ratio to the surface flow. At the northwest corner of the lake^ a stream, which is the actual source of the Bow river, enters (see reproduction page 102); this rises about 3 miles west of the lake upon the Bow smnmit^ and is for the most part spring fed; it has drainage area for several squarf miles and at the time of examination had u discharge of from 10 to 20 c.f Along the north side of the lake there are a number of small creeks with a flo>s of from 2 or 3 c.f.s. to 8 or 10 c.f.s. discharging into the lake; on the south sule there are only two or three streams entering the lake, the principal one coming from the Crowfoot glacier; this had a discharge of 10 to 12 c.f.s. when examined. There is no doubt that springs discharging considerable quantities of water exist, as a nimaber of pot holes of from 10 to 15 feet in depth are filled with water; these stand with the water about 10 feet above the lake level, and from the appearance of the water must receive their supply from an underground source. During the time the surveys oi the lake were made in the latter part of August, the discharge from the lake was between 125 and 150 c.f.s.; earlier in the season this is, no doubt, very much exceeded. Process of Filling. Measurement of the discharge from the Bow lake have not been made owing to the difficulty of access, and the foregoing figures are based upon estimates made of the diflferent discharges; it is thus impossible to draw up diagrams showitog the process of filling and emptying the proposed reservoir though certain conclusions have been arrived at. On the assumption of 27 \11 acre-feet of storage, if the process of filling was commenced May 1 and continued during Jime, July and August, with a constant inflow into the basin, it would require 112 c.f.s. to fill the basin. There is therefore no reason to doubt that there is sufficient rim-off into the lake to provide this amount of storage, and make up the loss due to evaporation. ■ Manipulation of Storage. One objection to this storage basin, is its distance from the point of utiliza- tion, and in view of what has occurred during the winter of 1912-13, the objection appears to be a good one. There is also the question of attendance in connection with regulation and some method of communication; the objection to placing an attendant at the lake, during the winter, is the difficulty of securing a man who would be both suitable and willing to remain at the lake during the entire winter, for at this season it would be difficult to get out and in. If a telephone was placed at the lake, a line would have to be built from Laegan, a distance of nearly 30 miles. . J • . It is proposed, however, to make special use of this storage; dun;ig the season just mentioned it was necessary to draw on the storage during November und December, and the water would be badly needed during the early sprintr BOW RIVEIt POWER AND aTORAOIS SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26« monthfl; the idea is, therefore, to release the water from Bow lake during November and December, or March and April, dependmg upon the season, the latter period bemg preferable as conditions are improving and the lews due to ice troubles would be reduced to a minimum. No attempt at regulation would be made, but a uniform discharge over a period of one month could be maintamed. Any necessary regulation could then be made more easily by means of storage in closer proximit j- to the point of u^. By operatmg in this way, the services of an attendant at the dam could be dispensed with, and the loss due to the formation of ice could to a large extent be overcome. Assuming that all the water would be released in one month, a contmuous discharge of 466 c.f .s. would be secured at tae lake. In amvmg at the benefats to be derived from storage in the lower river, only a discharge of 400 c.f.s. has been used, it being assumed that the rest is lost between the pomt of storage and the point used. Dam. The site of the proposed structure is 400 feet downstream from the outlet of the lake. About that distance downstream the river makes a sharp bend to the left, and then again to the right, forming the letter "S." On the right hand side the bank rises steeply for a height of 15 feet, then slopes more gently, rising to an elevation of 35 feet above the water in a distance of 150 feet, where the solid rock is exposed, formmg the banks of the river. On the left side the slope is more gentle, rising gradually from the surface of the stream to a height of 35 feet in about 400; the rock is overlaid as on the other side by a glacial deposit of boulder clay; a short distance upstream, on the left side, the rock is exposed, but not at the dam line. The stream at this point is fifty feet wide, and flows over boulders and gravel overlying the solid rock. ,,,,,• The bedrock, where exposed on the left side, is a thinly-bedded limestone, and is badly disintegrated (see reproduction page 104). On tlie right hand side this is not the case, the rock exposed being in good condition. The structure involved in creating the storage will be a dam 650 feet long, the centre portion of which will be a hollow-type spillway section of concrete provided with sluiceways for dischargmg the water, and also providing tor extra discharge if necessary. Spillway. The spill section would be placed in the bed of the stream, and from founda- tion to spillway elevation would be between 35 and 40 feet, dependmg upon the depth at which the solid rock lies. The spillway section will be provided with concrete wing walls at each end, and with either a concrete core-wall or steel sleet piling extending through the earth fill section. . A provisional section has been prepared for estimatmg purposes, and is shown in the accompanying drawings. It is proposed to place three 4-foot by 4-foot sluices in the dam to provide for dischargmg the storage; these will be provided with suitable gates and operating mechanism and will provide for additional discharge should the 100 feet of spillway prove madequate at flood time. This, however, is only a remote possibility as a run-off of 25 c.f.s. per square mile would only give a discharge of 750 c.f. s., while with an overtop of 1 foot the spillway would discharge 334 c.f.s. and with 2 feet overtop, 945 c.f.s. Embankment. At either end of the spillway section, the dam will be inade up of an earth embankment carefully built of boulder clay found m the immediate vicmity, ffi^nThe right hand side 130 feet and on the left 400 feet long. .The embank- ments will rise to elevation 6,535, x5 feet above the upper level of the basm. •"KtOCOrr MSMUTION TBT CNAIT (ANSI and ISO TEST CHART No. 2) A 165J Cml lilo,„ sirMi »Och«l.r !«, Ton T4609 USA ('16) ♦« - OMO-PImn, (7ie) 2M - igaa - ro. 102 DEPARTMETfT OF TBE INTERIOR .m. 1 , , * GEORGE V.. A. 191S Ihe Slopes of the embankments will be 2 : l.the upstream sides will h*. ««. rapped to a depth of 1 foot for the whole of the surfS an" WMheJ over ^t^ a cement grout, a,nd they will be 10 feet wide on top. A concreTe Sre wajTor Creek «,teri«,»pp„«rfoI Bow lake. ^*^*»^r^O.Bmiiy. »owUk.-Looki„tow«d.o«tl.,. ^^^VC.n^ary. BOW RITMB POWKR AND 8T0RA0B 103 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 86* In addition to these, it will be necessary to build an embankment opposite the outlet of the upper part of the lake at the point indicated on the plan; this will be 460 feet loi^ and 8 feet hi^h at the highest point. By placing the embankment at this point, water will be prevented from escaping down what is apparently an old bed of the river, lying to the north of the present one, and joining it about a mile-and-a-half downstream. CoNSTBUcnoN Difficulties. The creation of the storage at this point does not present any engineering difficulties. The greatest difficulty to be overcome is transportation; at present the only means of communication is by pack trail, and though a considerable length of new trail has recently been constructed, the cost to convert it into a wagon road would be prohibitive. Winter transportation seer<8 to be the solution of the difficulty; during the summer all the Bow valley flats below Hector lake are soft, but in the winter, for little outlay, a first-class road could be built. Above Hector lake there are no difficulties to be encountered either in the way of hills or soft spots. Once the bottom was secured, heavy loads could be transported with ease, and the cost should not exceed S8,000 to $10,000 at the outside. Transportation being secured, the cost of undertaking would be small, supplies being placed on the ground during the wintvr and the work prosecuted dunng the summer. It would be possible, if proper precautions were taken, to place the central portion of the dam during th j winter or low-water period. Estimated Cost. The estimated cost of construction is as follows: Clearing $5,500-00 Dam— Earth section 11 ,00000 Rip-rap 4,30000 Spill section 30,00000 Wing walls 15,00000 Core walls 8,00000 Valves and installation 6,00000 Excavation 1 ,200-00 Miscellaneous: Winter road 10,00000 Engineering and contingencies, etc 14,000-00 S 105,00000 Available storage 27,400 acre-feet. Cost, per acre-foot $3 83 i { 104 OEI'.MITMKST OF THE INTERIOR 6 QEORQE v., A. 1915 I !: !, lil I: i Bow Lkk* nek at Dun dt». Photo br U. C. HMdir. BOW RIXER POWER ASD STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e 105 CHAPTER IX. ELBOW RIVER. General. The Elbow river is one of the chief tributaries of the Bow, to which it adds its waters within the limits of the City of Calgary; from source to mouth it is over 60 miles in length. It rises in the eastern slope of the Rookies, the source being near the main continental divide, and it has all the features of a mountain stream. The total drainage area of the Elbow river is 482 square miles, about 255 square miles of which lie above what may be termed the power-producing section. Near the head of the river, the drainage area is al' ..t a considerable altitude, and, in consequence, the discharge is very susceptible to changes in temperature. The flood period occurs toward the latter end of May and during the month of June, when the flow of the stream is augmented by the water from the melting snow in the mountains. Owing to the steep slope, the run-off is very rapid and the variations in the stream flow very great, due not only to hot weather, but to the sudden heavy rains which occur in the region. The river-bed is composed for its entire length of gravel and detritus, espe- cially in the mountain portion, where the gravel overlies the bed rock to con- siderable depths, the latter being exposed only at isolated points. These conditions are ideal for underflow, the flattening out of the slope of the stream allowing the water under the slower velocity to sink into the loose material composing the bed. Discharge. Gaugings have been kept of the Elbow river for a considerable period, and with very few omissions since May, 1908. The station is just above the junction with the Bow river and gives the total discharge of the river; no other gauging station has been established, but miscellaneous meterings have been made at other points on the river. These have, with few exceptions, been made at other than the low water period, consequently it is nearly impossible to arrive at any definite conclusion as to the discharge of the upper part of the river. Isolated gaugings were made in the vicinity of Canyon creek during the winter of 1910-11, and may be used as an indication of the probable discharge at that time, though the discharge, due to ice conditions, may vary greatly from day to day or even from hour to hour. The fact that under-flow occurs has a very material bearing on the discharge. This portion of the run-off is not re- corded, but is, nevertheless, available, for the erection of a structure in the stream bed on a solid foundation would intercept all the flow, thus any recorded surface flow must be increased to arrive at th' true discharge of the stream. Tables are included giving the discharge of the Elbow river at Calgarj-, also a curve giving the mean monthly discharges has been plotted and is included. (See diagram, Plate No. 4.) The table reveals the fact that the surface flow is at times as low as 100 c.f.s., and may be even lower, though what amount should be added to this to give the combined surface and undertow discharge is rather hard to determine. In March 14, 1911, gaugings were made above and below Canyon creek which was practically dr>'; the results were 92 and 113 c.f.s. ;l I' ' ll 1 106 DBPABTMmT OF TBM nfTMBIOM B OEORQE v., A. 191B respectively, or s difference of 21 c.f.B. in two sections 200 feet apart, which m^ be taken as rather conclusive evidence of the presence of underflow. In Feb- ruary, 1911, gaugings were made at the same two points, and gave 138 c.f.s. above and 135 c.f.s. below. Mr. Mitchell, in a report upon the possibilities of power on the Elbow, states that, in his opinion, the underflow may be taken as forming 25 per cent, of the total discharge of the river in the vicinity of Canyon creek: no attempt has been made to verify this opinion by actual measurement, as the construction of a tight weir would be involved, but there seems little reason for disputing it, in fact, quite possibly this figure might be exceeded. From the tables and the foregoing estimate of underflow it is concluded that the total mean discharge of the river at Canyon creek wU not he less than say 120 c.f.s. This low flow would extend over the period from Decim- ber 15 to March 15. Power Section of River. In May, 1911, a reconnaisance of the Elbow river was made and from the ex- amination of the river it was decided that the possibility of producing power was confined to the section lying between the 20- foot falls in section 17, township 22. range 6, west 5th, and the east boundary of section 14, township 22. range 6, .-"st 5th. Below Canyon creek for a distance of about 2 milM the river is confined in a narrow valley by banks from 150 to 200 feet high; below this section the fall in the river is less, so nothing would be gained by going below the point indicated. , , . -, xu u Between the 20 foot falls and the Canyon creek the river flows through what is practically a continuous canyon. Above the falls the valley is wide and flat and it was hoped that advantage might be taken of the natural fall and the wide valley above for a power site but no feasible dam site exists in the vicinity with banks of sufficient height. There are several possible locations below the falls to which the same applies, but the only one found is at a point a few hundred yards above the mouth of Canyon creek. One site lying above this was examined in detail, which in itself was suitable in every way, but the existence below it of a very high cliff and rock slide on the north side precluded the building of a necessary flume, so that point had to be abandoned. The height of the cliffs and adjacent benches determine the height to which the dam, necessary in connection with a flume line, may be built. In any scheme that has been evolved for the development of power on the Elbow, a flume line has been an essential part; the comparatively low discharge neces- sitates a high head development to insure economical development. The gen- eral idea of the development has therefore been, to develop part of the head by a dam and to secure the remainder by carrying the water along the benches to some convenient point and there convey it to the valley, thus utilwing the natural fall in the river below the dam. Storaox. rhe flat above the 20-foot falls narrows rapidly about 2 miles up the valley, and is co. fined by the high mountains. The river is very steep and rough and at the extreme end issues through a narrow gap between two mountains; here the walls are formed of limestone. „ / j x- Just above the gap there is a very wide valley (see reproduction page 107), the whole bottom of which is covered with gravel, and the stream finds its way through this by a number of small channels. The valley is about 3 miles long and varies from 1,200 to l,600,feet in width, and with the g»P « the lower endforms an ideal site for storage; this question will be dealt with later. BOW RIVER POWER A.VO STORAOK SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« P ! n IP! I I; H 108 DEPARTMENT Of TBE INTERIOR PowBB Development. 5 QEORGE v.. A. 1918 The study of the situation during reconnaissance leads to the conclusion that there is only one scheme worthy of full consideration. This involves a dam above the Canyon creek, a flume line following the bench lands on the north side of the river, and a power house placed in the river valley about a mile and a half below Canyon creek. In May, 1911, a party was plac^ m the field and this general scheme was developed in detail; a survey was made of the dam site in sufficient detail to admit of preliminary plans and estimates for the struc- ture being made, care being taken to locate all evidence of rock in place and obtain such additional information as might be necessary. The flood line was defined in a general way, the upper limit being located at all vital points. The flume line was located and a contour survey made of the country adjacent to the line including the site of the proposed head-works, penstock line and power- house. This information is all embodied in the accompanying plans. PowEB Dam. The site of the dam is a few hundred yards above the mouth of Canyon creek where the river flows between two high rock cliffs (see reproduction page 107). The south bank rises to a height of 80 feet above the surface of the riv3r, while on the north side it rises to 90 feet. The bank on the south side slopes back gradually from the top of the cliff, rising to an elevation of several hundred feet, while on the north the height of the banks is about 175 feet, 125 to 150 feet of which is rock cliff, a dam at this point would raise the water to a sufficient height to allow it being carried on the bench in a flume. It would also back the water upstream to a point about a quarter of a mile above the 20 foot falls, flooding an area of about 80 acres. The lower hundred feet of the dam is not over 250 feet in length. An ap- proximate estimate of the cost of the dam has been r lade and is given. Flume and Penstock. It is proposed to construct the conduit between the power dam and the forebay or standpip-? above the power station of wooden staves, banded with steel, having a circular section 84 inches in diameter. Such a flume when well built of good timber is tight and efficient and has a life of from fifteen to twenty years, depending on earth and water conditions; it is elastic, easy of transport and construction, offers a minimum frictional loss to flowing water and is above all, economical in first cost and repairs. The total length of flume is about 7,500 feet, most of which will be laid in shallow eari" cut on the sides of the gravel benches, and would be subjected to but a few pounds pressure. The flume line as located was assumed at an elevation of 4,820, the water surface being 4,840. On this assumption it was run as nearly as possible to grade. It follows along the top of the first bench on the north side of the river, crossing Canyon creek about 150 yards from the mouth, on a trestle. It then keeps up on the second bench at a distance from the river, varymg between two hundred feet and a quarter of a mile. At the lower end of the flume a regulation chamber or forebay is proposed, and leading from it to the power house a penstock (wooden stave pipe) 84 inches diameter and 1,600 feet long, wiU be necessary. The larger diameter is designed to reduce the velocity wid avoid dangerous water hammer in so long a pipe, which would also be fitted with relief valves at the lower end. The penstock would be laid in a trench conform- ing to the general grades of the hillsides and benches and be amply provided with concrete anchorages. BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAQE ^09 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e F. AY. bv aTi;^Sw*T?^**® ** **^* '°r' «°<* ^ » «°°«'e*« Chamber surmoiuited ^ fcSJSi «^*'P* *"° arT|Ulged and 6t such dimepsiohs that it will Torn ?L^^ w** "»«"'°» o' small capacity into which the water will flow horn h^JTl^°"' commencing its flow down the penstock. ^8 VhamblriS^ Jh JtiS^Hn^^f"* "Jl^l^'Tv**}* ''?"?°' '«^«' «' *»»«»'«* at the dam imd the (0^0} &^te.':fi'*?•^*'^*'n*'l*^***'^ crest and win thus also act S a s^ge Power Station. iA * •^^ ?!^ S[ **** P"'^®'" house ia just west of the eastern boundary of section m the nver at that pomt (see reproduction page 114), a dry channel of Su-S^? S^be**! 61*?":Ji°th^*inT,?- • J»>« «?-atioi' of theUTSf the ««u race wui be 4,61.8, and the total fall mtercepted 222 feet of whixh ««_ In^^lSiSitr"^' "^ avaUablefor powerp?odttion.feg°ic"nSu;S^ Eqcipment. ,mi* J*K ^°''*' ^^'H?" P'oP«»e<■ "V"' and in order that these ^ v.v might be dealt with the investigations were instituted with the above , .ts^ in f hi i^™!Ii- ! • *•"•.** P^T'l'" ""V**' °^"8 *° *he '^•B'l <^o«t per horse- , v. . oe b^ wl.l«nf Jr '*''*!"'•*'' '''?'* '* " *.rt° ^°"^*f"' ^^'^ther the development would w!.Jh7^ * **'i.*\'* " """t^ P°*«^'« *•»«* P«^" produced by a steam plant h^^the wX?" ■ ■ ^'' ^^l*""^ °"'J^>^ ««"1^^ ^»»«n the qualitv ofThe coal m the locality is .;.iown. The one th ng in favour of the water nower is it« Dowef cUacif ' '"^^ °J P^'^'' '°^^?n ™ 'p'^*' -hile nomL'lTof K'hor^e- K ^wpr n^St''* commercially operated so as to sell from 4.500 to 5,000 inX" Cds ' ^^ " ''"'^^ frequent! • done, owing to overlapping 114 DBPAKTMENT OF THE INTBRtOB 5 GEORGE v.. A. 19lS r - [|i m 3 Q 1 J s 'S I s 09 ■a I BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA0E SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26e 119 CHAPTER X. ADDITION STORAGE INSPECTIONS. In the investigation for storage, a general reconnaissance of the whole basin TwilS f' ''*^"° "^^"^ ?' sections were proven to be economically unsuit- twin Jk^'^^^P^'P^^' **r*¥'* ^P"^^^ *^« '"8««* part of the district inves- tigated they are worthy of description. '^^^ ur^;,,- «r^«^% -^^ particular division belong the following, which are named in the order of mvestigation: — (a) Kananaskis river and lakes. (b) Hector lake. (c) Pipestone creek. (d) Baker creek. (e) Johnson creek. (f) Redearth creek. (g) Brewster creek, (h) Ghost river. The question of storage on the first two was looked into in 1911, the rest bemg mvestigated in 1912. ' KANANASKIS RIVER AND LAKES. ,.f«ril^ff?if"2,"''^^-^"''®'"' J'H'''^ ^""^^ ^™™ **>« ^""t'l' '8 one of the main trib- f^il^tl Bow joining the latter at the head of Kananaskis falls; the western limit of Its watershed forms the boundary of the Rocky Mountains park. Source. »r« .Tif An"*T^^ "''^'' •'f 'i* ?°"^''* '" *^° 'a''^'' of **>e same name which are about 40 miles due south of the Canadian Pacific railway at Kananaskis: these lakes he at an elevation of about 5,500 feet above sea-level and are situated close to the main continental divide, which here forms a barrier of snow-caoDed at7^T\ ^° *Vr**u°^*•^?. l^^r" i« Kananaskis pass, with an IkvaS of 6,200 feet, over which the trail leads, following the Palliser river down to the Kootenay. From the south, there is a small stream flowing into the lower lake- this rises near the summit of Elk pass, at an elevation of 6,500 feet. ' Tributaries. Just below the outlet of the lower lake, a small stream, which rises on the summit between the Spray and Kananaskis basins and drains the area between tne Kananaskis and Spray ranges, comes in from the west. About 3 miles below the outlet we come to the forks, where from the east, flows a stream rising between Misty and Elk ranges, and draimng the territory lying to the east of the lake, and west of the Misty range. These streams and branches of the Kananaskis form its principal tributaries. Below the junction with the east fork, the streams flowing in are all short and of negligible sise, the largest one being that coming in from the east a short dis- tance south of tlie Indian Resen^e boundarj-. Between these two points the nver » confined between the Opal and Kananaskis ranges, and the valley is com- paratively narrow. (See contour map.) 116 nEPARTMEST OF THE IXTERIOR 5 GEORGE v.. A. 191S Kananaskis Lakes. ih !■ ^? !. The Kananaskis lakes are spoken of as the Upper and Lower lakes, on account of a difference in level of about 90 feet, the Upper lake being at elevation 5,550 and the Lower at elevation 5,460. The Upper lake is about 2^ miles long and l\i miles wide. The lower is 3 miles long and half-a-mile wide. The Upper lake is worthy of special mention from a scenic point of view — it is studded with islands and has snow-capped mountains to form a background, the addition of well-timbered shores and islands forms a picture which rivals in beauty any of the better-known lakes which are to be found in the Rockies. (See reproduction page 117). The stream which joins the Upper and Lower lakes is about 1 mile in length and, as has been noted, drops 90 feet in that distance, the fall being composed of rapids and one abrupt fall of about 40 feet. The Lower lake, being surrounded by lower-lying hills, and having no islands, presents a less fine appearance than the Upper lake, though it is not without beauty. The fishing in these two lakes is exceUent, and will be an added attraction to the locality when it becomes, as no doubt it will, a resort for tourists. (See reproduction page 118.) As far as storage is concerned, the lakes do not offer any desirable site, the outlet of the Upper lake — the only possible point at which the water could be controlled — would require such a long structure placed in water of consider- able depth (from inspection estimated at at least 40 feet) at a cost which, in view of the advantages obtained, is beyond consideration. Further, in considering any scheme of storage on this lake, the beauty of the lake in its natural state and the extreme probability of its becoming a summer resort in the near future should not be lost sight of. Below the Lower lake for a considerable distance the banks of the valley are far apart, and except at one point about a mile and a half below the outlet of the lake, do not offer a site for control. At this point there is a possible site for a dam, but the fall of the stream is so rapid that at the extreme height of the dam only about 2 feet of storage would be obtainable on the lake, and the structure involved would be six or seven hundrnd feet long on the crest. After careful consideration of the physical peculiarities of the locality, it was not thought that a detail survey of the different points in the vicinity was justified, and the possibility of storage at this point was therefore not further considered. Kananaskis River. The Kananaskis river has a drainage area of 406 square miles between the lakes and the Bow river. It flows through a narrow valley confined by high mountains — the Kananaskis range forming the west boundary, and the Opal range the east. The tributaries are all small and on account of the topography are mountain torrents, being short and steep and carry down lar|^ quantities of gravel and detritus. The valley bottom through which the river flows is, on the whole, wide and flat. Where this is not the case, the river flows between alternating high rocky cliff and gravel and clay banks, the latter being moraines composed of the material transported by the mountain torrent and ancient glaciers. The valley floor is deeply covered with this transported material, through which the nver has cut its way and, where the valley is wide and flat, the river is continually changinK its course, especially during the high-water season. At one point about 4 miles below the Lower lake, a fall about 26 feet high occurs; for the rest of its length, no abrupt drops occur, but the fall is considerable. BOW RITER POWER ATiD STORAGE ,,7 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Storaqe Possibilities. «-.„?"* i?'^®"® ^^^^^ ^"^ ^®«° P"* forward for the storage of water from the Kananaskis nver. From a point south of the Indian reserve the water Zs to be conveyed across the summit by canal or flumriTSe ChTnik? ^ the soutrJT^'' -K" r.'i'^involve a dam in the river at a point abou 5 muS south of the mouth of the first creek which flows into the rivw from the Tasf fh» iif " • u? "^•'^^f^'y to build a structure about 50 feet high in order that the water might be raised over the low summit between the lake aSi the river fhe ^o^Sh?ttlr.!^w'' '°^^ ^°^'^^® ""^"^"y *« carrj- the wUr acS ine low valley of the creek mentioned above. At the lower end of tholalcp a structure approximately 4,000 feet long would be requ Jed trmaintain the ^i^l^T^rr^'^^Z^^fV^''^ •* '^"'d be retu?22d to the river "^hen required at the Kananaskis falls and Horseshoe falls on the Bow river « or^t elevation of the river at the point where a dam would be necessarv 3ertiS4^2ri* v' TfK*-®'iT' T^^i **»'' ^'^''dian Pacific Cway brid^or elevation 4 328; lake Chmiki level reduced to the same elevation is 4 300 th^ summit referred to between the lake and river is long S flaT risine to ^ S'over°' ''''"' P''"'"'^* *^® P""''^'"*^ °f ^ canWLugiiTpVce^f a,k«^ careful survey of the river has revealed the fact that there are several sites Sf'L''"*" ?*°"*® ^*?^? "*y ^ developed, ^hey must, however be iot SSe?a^d*nL^"'^'**S*« ^'^°«' be««n«ed for the criatiTrf 'aSdlLTy power and providmg small amounts of water to carry the peak loads on the TfeSt^nf^?h?°J "^.^'l.*'''"^ ^^^ J"^''*'°" °f *»>« Kan^maskfs aid Bow rive™ The sites of this description are three in number, as follows :- mn..f k rr*k *'• "• h~^^^ "PP?' "*« situated about 9 miles upstream from the SI n,^"-*' ** t P;?'*'* ^^"""^ *^° »P"". °f *»»« mountabs apprr^one another, producmg a short canyon through which the river flows. T\ valley I'ppcr Kknanaikis Lake. Photo by M. C. Hendry. lit DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR i fl BQEcn^-- v., A. 191 B above this canyon is wide and provides for considerable storage at this point. (See reproduction page 122.) Survejrs were made in more detail by the Calgary Power Company and the figures in relation to the size of the structures and capacity of the basms are quoted from the report by their engineers. The length of river flooded would be approximately 12,000 feet. "Hie siae of the structure involved is as follows: — Height of dam HO feet. Length on crest 1,260 " Depth of water 100 " Avera^je head (for power purposes) 70 " Capacity of basin 14,900 acre-feet. Estimated cost $304,000 ' '• Phato by If . C. Hendry. Lower KuaaMlda Lalce. Central Site, No. £. — The middle site lies about 6 miles upstre&m from the mouth of the river. The site of the dam is in a narrow rock canyon (see repro- duction page 123), *he walls of which rue abruptly to a height of about 100 feet above the level of the river. The flooded length of the river at this site would be approximately 0,500 feet. The size of the dam involved is as follows: — Length on the crest , . . 1,000 feet. ' Height of water ..;.. 100 " . Height of daib 110 " , ■ . ' Average head (for power purposes) 70 " Capacity of basin 10,760 acre-feet. Estimated cost 9213,000 Lower Site, No. S. — The lower site is the one of particular interest. It lies about three-quarters of a mile above the mouth of the river, at which point the water is raised about 12 feet by the Kananaskis Falls plant. That is, the impounding structure is actually situated in the pond of the plant below BOW taVBR POWBB AND 8T0BA0B iff SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« ft th« nU^f ""Sf.^!!??"***!™™ '*""«! " »* """^ available for producmg power The sue and capacity of the structure is as follows:— ?^5i{! °/ flooar. .laaoary... February.. Maroh il^::::::. Mean Flow 2S2 204 138 129 129 128 477 COB- Flow later- "fw* Sorplua A3°ft. I Flow Shoura per day. Ac-ft. Deficit Flow Ae..(t. ISO 130 ur ISO I 130 I 130 130 1,(88-4 i 6,282-8 1,639- ' 2,763-2 1,68»- 1,480-6 i 1,«»- ' 1,886-4 I 1,370- 1,536- 1,700-5 1,700-5 Quantity in Baain Ac-ft. Remark*. 8,040- Baain full. .8,040- 6,770- iBasJi drawn on. 5,834- 3,534-5 1,825-0 First Assumption. The only benefit obtained during the last month of storage being that due to the effect of the eight-hour discharge upon the plants below. The con- tinuous discharge cannot be included since it represents the natural flow of the river and would be utilized under ordinary conditions. This effect may be stated as follows: — During the fir!:^ five months of storage the avera^o head at the storage dam may be taken as 45 fct, giving a continuous output . 572 b.h.p. due to a dis- charge of 140 c.f.s. In addition to this there will be an output for eight hours each day of 330 b.h.p., due to a discharge of 81 c.f.s. The effect of releasing 81 second-feet from the basin would be to make it .it once available for power production at the three points below the basin at Kan- anaskis falls. Horseshoe falls and the Bow Fort site since the tail-water of one plant is nearly at the same elevation as the head-water of the plant next below. The effect upon the fourth site would not be noticed for at least two hours after water wa.s rele.'wed, as there is a stretch of about 8 miles of river between the tail-water of the Bow Fort site and the Mission site; at the next two sites, Ghost and Radnor, the effect would be noticed about the same time or approximately two hours and a half after water was released. If the power from BOW RIVMR POWER AND STORAQE ^ SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e these plants could be sold so that the peaks could lag behind tho n^ ^ ^i.^ by releasing water from the auxiliary storage to the following extent :-^^ Effect of Kananaskis Auxill\ry Stobaqe Table No. 16. Plant. Kananaakia Falls., Hormhoe Falta. . Bow Fort MioionSite ObostSite RadoorSite Total on 6 plaati. J ^'i t^^J'?"' *^®'« " *^e continuous output for five mnntha a* ♦k^ ^ dam of 572 b.h.p. due to 140 c.f.s. flow; alsKe pLnuSS of 3^0 h )f « '*** a total peak output, due to 81 c.f.8. on aU thTpLmte of 2 8flR b h n f„ « ^-^P'Or For the whole period the peak load outpufSSbf S^^^J^tytfel "^ Second AssmiprioN. Table No. 15 provides for a continuous flow of 130 sa«»onH f«.+ »i.: i. there » in the blam .t the MdrfX\^ .^^S;^?"?" "■" *"•«««»«" Table No. 17. Effect of Kananaskis Auxiliary Storage Plant. Head. Peak Load Power. -ki» Falls. Horssahoe Falla. . Bow Fort Site Miasiun Site Ohoat Site Radnor Site Storage Site Total: Peak load output from storacr. 70 70 ae 47 SO 44 4S b.h.p. 510 510 480 S42 an 330 337 3,852 Or, comparing the two methods on the basis of horse-oower ho..r« *k« 122 DtPA-tt. dWST OF TEE lETEEIOE 6 GEORGE v., A. 1S15 By the second method of regulation the output on peak load from auxiliary stonwe would be 4,700,096 horse-power hours. By the first method the contmuous output of power would be reduced by 907,200 horse-power hours and by the second increased about one-half of that amount, or 383,000 horse-power hours. If the peak loads are high, then the second method of r^:ulation would be the most advantageous. If the load is nearly uniform, then the reverse is the case. No definite conclusions can be drawn with regard to the economic side of the question without knowing the load conditions on the plants. An attempt has been made, however, to arrive at the probable cost of the power produced by the use of this basin. The cost deduced is in terms of kilowatt hours, ♦" conform to the other costs in this report. to 111 i I |i Photo by M. C. Hendry. y»ii»n«MH« River— Looking South (rom shoulder of Ht. HoDougall. CAPrrxL Cost. The estimated cost of creating this storage also building and equippmg the auxiliary plant is, approximately, $150,000. Annual Charges. Taking the capital cost at 1150,000, the probable annual cost of maintain- ing and operating the plant would be: — 1. Interest on capital invested assuming financmg done on bonds at 6 per cent, sold at par $9,000-00 2. Sinking fund to return bonds in 30 years, reinvested at 4 per cent, say 1} per cent 2 ,625 -00 3. Depreciation, adjusted between general works and equipment, to provide for major repairs and renewals 2 ,250-00 4. Operation and maintenance, including management, superintendence, wages, minor repairs, etc 3 ,375 -00 Total annual charges $17,260-00 il M>W KVMtt POWtB AND STOBAOt 123 SESSIONAL PAPER Na 2r« Kamuiaskia IUve.^I«.kiD, North from shoulder of Mt. M^^^ "• ^- ^'^'^^^ Cost of Power. That is the total output from storage is 8,805,400 k.w. hours On this basis, assuming the annual charees at tno^nthl'^r. ^ 1 hour would be 0-20 cents. ^-aarges at »i7,,i50, the cost per k.w. Owing to the possibility that some time may e'aosp hpfnpp tv,« tK,<.„ i ^ i/t,^^^°'^' tli« capital cost of the undertaking would be »150non n^^ +»,« from the storage created would be:- ^ " ^''^ °"*P"* °^ P°^«' ^"°" SSaSkis "^ '"J"* ^'21^^ ^•^- J>°"^« per year. Kananaskis 660,906 « « " « Horseshoe Falls 550905 « " « « BowFortSite " 618;499 " " « « With an annuals of |17,260the cost would'rd'22 c^nts^'p^eTKh^o^S: 1M DEPABTUBXT OF TBB INTERIOR 5 QEORGE v., A. 10:S HECTOR LAKE. if In July, 1911, a reconnaisaance was made of the upper part of the Bow river, to determine the poaaibilities of storage in that seotton of the river. The expectation was that either or both the lakes, Hector and Bow, forming the source of the Bow river, might be utilised. Bow lake at the source was proved to be suitable, and is dealt with in another part of the report; on the other hand, Hector lake was foimd to be unsuitable for storage purposes. (See reproduction page 127). Hector lake lies in a hollow formed between a number of high peaks; to the west lie mounts Gordon, Balfour and Olive, of altitudes 10,336, 10,731 and 10,260 feet, respectively, all glacier-hung peaks. To the south is Pulpit peLk, of an fdevation 6,930, and to the north Bes Bow peak. 'liector UJie is fed from the glaciers to the west, and also from two small lal 4i to the south that lie at high altitudes— the upper one, Turquoise lake, at an elevation of 6,975 feet, and Miurfaret lake at an elevation of 5,906; the upjper lake empties into the lower, and this in turn into Hector lake; to the north is a stream coming down on the south side of Bow peak. The lake is about 3^ miles long, and three-quarters of a mile mde, it lies about 15 miles by tibte nver above Lauan and at an elevation (rf 6^700 feet above sea-level, or upwards of 600 feet higher than Lag^an. The lake is to the west of the river, about three-quarters of a mile, and u connected with it by two streams which form the outlet; the intervening land had the appearance of having been deposited there in past ages by the river in the form oi a bar. Apparentiy the lake at one time formed a great enlargement of the river and was probably, at the same time, to a great extent covered by the ice from the glacier to the west. This glacier is known as Balfour glacier and is formed by tiie imm^se snow fields which cap the summit of the main divide at this point, and which also feed the Bow glacier. As the glacier receded, the bed of the present lake was Itft, the east end bdng separated from the river by the material deposited, as has been said. This barrier, as it may be called, ib about three-quarters of a mile wide, and about the same length, parallel to the river, rising to an elevation of several feet above the level of the lake, and any structure to impound water in the lake would hp- 3 to be of great length in order to rabe the lake level any considerable height; the material is loose and in places very swampy. The lake could not be considered, therefore, as a storage basin either from the engineering or economic standpoint. PIPESTONE CREEK. The Pipestone creek is one of the largest tributaries of the Bow river, entering above Banff. It has a drainage area of about 160 square miles, which is comparable with that of the main river above their junction, tHir confluence is about half a mile below Laggan station on the Canadian Paciuc railway. Discharge. At the junction point with the main river a gauging station has been ♦•"^-blished at the instance of the Water Power Branch. The discharge of the Pipestone, as measured at the entrance of the Bow, T a considerable portion of the discharge of the Bow at that point. From records available the discbarge of the Pipestone may be taken as forming one- third of the discharge of the Bow below their junction during high water; during the normal period the proportion is irreater; while at the low-water period, it forms nearly one-half of the total discharge. BOW RIVER POWER A«D STORAQE 125 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25* The records extend over only a very brief period (since September, 191 1)» so that no definite conclusion can be drawn as to the relative discharges of the two streinns, but the vailable records are, however, included and may prove of interest. Drainage Area. The drainage area of the Pipestone is very similar in character to that of the Bow above Laggan, the same mountains forming a considerable proportion of the drainage area of each. Their sources lie at considerable altitude, the great difference oetween the tv/o being that while the Bow has two lakes as its source the Pipestone has no lake to act as a regulator of run-off. Strangely enough, this difference has apparently the opposite effect to that to be expected, for the variation between high and low water on the Pipestone is, from the records available, appar y less than upon the Bow. The Pipestone from source to mouth is about 22 mik - long. It rises at an altitude of 8,364, and is fed by numerous small streams coming down the ir.ountains, such as Molar eieek from mount Molar and from Cataract peak. The descent of this creek is very rapid, reaching an altitude at the junction with the Little Pipestone of 5,860, a fall of 2,500 feet in about 11 miles, or 257 feet per mile. For the next 6 miles the fall is 360 feet, or 60 feet per mile, and for the remainder of its length, about 110 feet per mile. The largest creek entering the Pipestone is that known as the Little Pipestone, which enters *rom the east, and is about 8 miles long, having as its source several sma? "'.es, which lie at between 6,500 and 7,000 feet above sea-level. It drains the northern slope of mounts Richardson and Ptarmigan, which are both over 10,000 feet high and glacier hung. Possibility or Storage. A reconnaiosance of the Pipestone with a view to storage was made in July, 1912, and at the same time the head-waters of Corral creek and Baker creek were examined. On the Pipestone it was found that for the first few miles the river was very rapid, the fall of 110 feet per mile being exceeded in places. The stream is confined to a comparatively narrow valley by high steep banks of what might be termed glacial drift, which overlies the rock to a considerable depth; this, in conjunction with the rapiditj' of fall, is not favourable for the storage of anj considerable volume — such as would warrant construction. Higher up, the valley widens into a large flat, which on examination showed that no suitable site for a dam offered itself, and that the slope of the valley was so great that in any event a high structure would be required to flood the valley for any distance upstream. Above the junction of the Little Pipestone the character of the valley changes, becoming narrower and much steeper; after careful examination it proved as disappointing as the lower portion of the river, and in consequence the only possible conclusion was that storage on the Pipestone is not possible, and no further work upon it was warranted. BAKER CREEK. At the same time as the reconnaissance of Pipestone creek the trip was made to include Baker creek, which is the next important stream to enter the Bow below Laggan. Drainage Area. This creek enters the Bow from the north about 8 miles from the mouth of the Pipestone; it is about 15 miles long and has ii drainage area of 52.8 square miles, about one-third the area of the Pipestone drainage basin. L^nlike the 25e— 10 DBfAMTMmiT OF TBM IVTMtttOR H' ] ■ J- i-t J! t a QEOROE Vh a. 191S Pipestone, it has two Iskes at the source of the main branch, whilst another lace forms the source of the second branch; these lakes are among the highest in the country, the lower of the two first— Baker lake — being at an elevation 7,280 feet above sea-level, and the higher— Ptarmigan lake— at an elevation, of 7,M1 feet; and lake Redoubt, which forms the source of one of the branches, is the highest, at an elevation of 8,000 feet. The elevation at the mouth of the river is 4,869, so it will be seen that the fall is very rapid: from Ptarmigan lake to Baker lake the fall is 331 feet in less than a mile, and from Baker lake to the mouth of that river the fall is 2,371 feet, being 1,230 feet in the first 3 miles below Baker lake, or 410 feet per mile, and from there to the mouth the fall averages 142 feet per mile. DiBCHABOE. The dischaige of Baker creek has uot been measured systematically, no gauging station has been established upon it and any records of its discharge that may exist are not available. An estimate of the discharge might be made from a cor parison of the sise of the drainage area and a study on the ground of the Pipestone and Baker creeks, assuming a run-off one-half that of the Pipestone. The existence of three lakes at the source of Baker creek would be expected to have some influence upon the regulation of the flow, but this regulation cannot be very marked on account of the formation of the outlets of the lakes. Storage Pobbibilitieb. After a study of the maps, and a consideration of the evidence gathered from men familiar with the country as to the physical features of the valley of Baker creek, it was considered that any possibility of storage lay ''u one or all of the lakes which were to be found at the head of the creek and that any study should be made at the upper part; this was done. Baker lake was the first one visited. As before stated, it lies in a ocky basin at an elevation of 7,230, is about three-quarters of a mile long from east to west, and about one-fifth of a mile wide. On the north side the shoulder of Fo;wil mountain slopes down to the water's edge, while to the south is Fallen mountain. The lake is confined in its bed by a long, low rock ridge, which extends across the east or outlet end, this ridge is very low, rising only a few feet above the lake level for the greater part of its length, and falling away very rapidly on the downstream side. The situation is not favourable for storage, the area that might be developed by a structure at the lower end being small, and, owing to the topography, any structure would be of great length. (See reproduction, page 128.) The upper, or Ptarmigan lake, about a mile to the west, is somewhat smaller than Baker lake, into which it empties, and is very similarly situated. From the outlet, the descent is very rapid, falling in a series of cascades; the outlet is over a low ridge, and presents the same difficulties to storage as does Baker lake. Redoubt lake lies to the south of the west end of Ptarmigan lake, and as has been point"'! out, is about 500 feet higher. The waters from Redoubt lake do not enter Baker creek through Ptarmigan and Baker lakes, but 11 rough a valley extending to the east from the shore of the lake. The descent of this creek is extremely rapid, it is less than 3 miles in length, yet in that distance it has a total fall of over 2,100 feet, from tt ee "o five hundred feet of this fall occu'rs at, or near, the outlet, and in this respect the lake is the most pecu- liar of the three. This lake is situated on a shelf of rock, on the shoulder of mount Redoubt, and on account of its situation (resembling a saucer upon a shelf) very little variation in level can occur. A rise of less than 2 feet aOW KITER POWER AND 8T0KA0M MT SESSIONAL PAPEt No. 28« would give a •piliway of at least 300 feet in lent. a,wlule auy reduction below that level prevents run-off, as apparently the only outlet is over the ridge ' M V Pecuhanty, taken m conjunction with its site, about one-half-a- nule by rae eighth of a mile, places it out of the question for storage. •1-* * "^*»o'» to the physical features of the lakes, their e:rtreme altitude nulitatefl their use as storage basins unless they could be utilised during the early faU to augment the flow; in the spring they would be useless, because by the time their waters, stored from the previous year, were available, the noods would have set m and discharge from storage would be unnecessary. The idea of using the lakes and Baker creek for storage purposes had there- fore to be abandoned. -« *- r JOHNSON CREEK. Johnson creek, a stream of considerable sise enterbg from the north, adds rts waters to the Bow river about 3^ miles below Castle station on the Canadian Pacific railway. It is about the same length as Baker creek. The head-waters are at considerable altitude, one branch rismg at 8,000 feet, and the area drained is 49 square miles. The mountains to be found in the basin, however, are not generally so high as those to be found iu the Baker basm ; in the matter of glaciers, too. It resembles Baker creek, there being none in either area. Given, then, the 8a™e general characteristics in the matter of altitude, area, etc., the run-off should be expected to be nearly the same, then- dramage areas being so close to one another. In the matter of lakes, the resemblance is not so marked, only one occurrmg on Johnson creek. For the upper 6 miles of the creek, the fall is 2,000 feet, or 333 feet per mile, below this the fall averages about 170 feet per mile down to the mouth, the total fall bemg 3,367 feet. About 8 miles from the mouth a small lake empties Its waters mto the main creek; this lake is about one-quarter of a mile to the west and almost 500 feet above the bed of the stream. 2.')E— lOj Hector Lake — Looking towards out'** Photo by M. C. Hendry. T9S nF.I'XltTMKST OF THE l\TF.RIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Discharge. No data are n -ailable regarding the discharge of Johnson creek, though it is understood that s' ne isolated gaugings were made of the creek during the last season, it might, however, be assumed that it would bear the same relation to the discharge of the Pipestone as Baker creek does, approximately one-half to one-third that of the former stream might be a fair estimate. I! 1:11 I'turniiKan Ijike. Storage Possibilities. Photo by M. «'. Hindry. In Augaxt. 1912, an investigaticm of this creek was made, in order to dcter- iniiic whether .storage of any extent might 1m '^veloped upon it. It was known tliat a deep and narrow canyon existed where tlie stream made its exit between the sluniMer of Castle mountain and the Sawback range (see reproduction, page 131) an«l that a valley of some cdjisiderable extent lay at theui)per end of the canyon. An examination" pntved this to be so. Access to the valley is gained by means of a trail which leads up the west side of the creek, and lies well up on the outlying shoulder of Castle mountain, (hi account of the depth and narrow- ness of the canyon, the trail swings up, as the latter is neared, then following parallel to it, it finally turns abruptly down until it strikes the rim of the canyon proper, along which it lies for nearly one-half mile until the latter widens out when the t-ail drops down into the valley so formed. This canyon is the deepest encoun- tered in the area lovered bv the inve.stigatieing reached that they were not adapted to storage. BREWSTER CREEK. The waters of Brew.ster creek an miles west of Banff; the flow is of fair magnitude, though no gauging has been made of the stream. Ji*«t above the mouth where it issues into the bottom of Bow valley, it spreads itself over a gravel flat and is divided into a number of small streams, each of which finds its way to the main river, an.e northeastern slope of the main divide, the chief of these rises in the niou'it.-iins Ivijig between the Spray river antl iiiuunt .\ssiniboine. Fatigue creek, fetl from t).e slopes tif the mtmntain of the same n:uue. .'ltd Dtiuglas, west of Fatigue creek; Healey creek lies farth.er to the west, 'u>ar the summit of Simpson |)ass. Above the junction of Healey creek antl Brewster creek, and on the main stream, occurs tl;e only pt)ssible site suitable for a storage dam. This is a can- yon of about 70 to 80 feet wide, and tM) to 70 feet tleej). In pas.e fxaniiTiatious exhausted the possible sites for storagi' in the mountains on streams tributarv to tic Bow. 130 DEPAimiENT OF TBE INTERIOS 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 GHOST RIVER. 11^ The Ghost river, which enters the Bow on the north side at a point about 35 miles west of Calgary, is 40 miles long from source to mouth, and has a drain- Age area of 367 square miles. Eight mUes from the mouth, the stream divides into two branches, known as the Main branch and the North Fork. At a point 7 miles farther the main stream divides again, one branch retaining the name Ghost river, and the other being known as the South Fork. The sources of these three branches are at about the same altitude, 8,000 feet above the sea-level. The South Fork rises on the east t-->pe of the Fairholm range, and issues through the gap formed by End mountain and Saddle peak into the foot-hill country, and in a distance of 8 miles falls 2,000 feet, or 250 feet per mile. The main branch of the Ghost rises on the north side of the Palliser range, of which Cascade mountain is the easterly end, it flows around to the north of mount Aylmer, to the south side of Devil's Head, and out into the foot-hills. The fall of this part of the Main branch is not as steep as that of the South Fork, being approximately 133 feet per mile; the valley through which it flows is wide, and covered with gravel and the debris carried down by the mountain torrents which are tributary to it. The North Fork rises on the eastern slope of Castle Rock; it has a less steep slope than the others, and is for the most part in the foot-hills; it has numerous tributaries, which rise in the swamps and sloughs to be foun i m the territory through which it flows. Discharge. Discharge records of the Ghost river have been kept since August, 1917 The gauging station, which was established at the instance of the Water Powt Branch, is at the highway bridge which crosses the river about 200 yards from the mouth, and the gauge rod is placed about 1 mile upstream. The available records cover only one year, the readings were unfortunately interrupted for a period during November and December, no data being available for a month during the low-water; good records were obtained, however, for January, February, March and April. The mean flow for that part of November avail- able shows a flow of 219 c.f.s., with 191 c.f.s. as the minimum, so that it may be assumed that a flow of approximately 100 c.f.s. is available during the period of low-water. The available records of run-off will be found elsewhere in the The greater part of the area drained by the Ghost river lies in the foot- hills' it is reasonable to expect, therefore, that the discharge will be more susceptible to the direct influence of rain and snowfall. An examination of the data reveals the fact that the flood period is earlier than on the other streams, making its appearance in April and May, and that the precipitation during the fall instead of being stored as it would be in the higher altitudes, is apparently discharged to a great extent at once, or being at a lower altitude is melted and runs off The run-off during September and October is comparable to that of May and June, while from the records the run-off during August appears to be even greater. Storage Possibilities. The slope of the stream is so steep in the mountain portion that the develop- ment of any storage in that section was at once discarded as improbable, and attention was given to the section to be found in the foot-hills. The South Fork and the Main branch both, particularly the portion between the junction with the South Fork and the junction with the North Fork, flow through vnlleys that are comparatively wide, varying from a couple of hundred to a thousand feet in width. During low and normal periods, the river spreads all over the BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« 131 JobMtons Creek Caayoa. Photo by M. C. Hendry. T32 DEFASTMWNT OF TBt IHTMRIOK !| I' ■A !(= 6 QEORQE v., A. 1915 valley; in many places the river is split up into a number of small streams, WhHili flow all over t^e gravd. bed of the river. The whole floor of the valley is covered to a con4d«nUe depth with the gravel and d^ritus Q^ed down by the river during ^h water, at which time the river covers the whole valley. (See rtmroduction,. iMkge 12). ,^ ^ ^^ ^ The banks are for the most part high, rising from 50 to between 100 and 200 feet, the rise for the first hundred feet being rather abrupt, after which it is mor? gradual. In the part between the two banks very little bottom land exists, the river occupying the whole of the valley bottom. The south side of the valley is mostly lonned of rockv cliffs, overlaid with gravel and glacial drift, and affording very few points of access to the river valley, from the north side the river may be reached in many places. The first point encountered where storage mu^t be developed, was just west of the junction of the Main branch and the Nwth Fork; here the banks of the valley approach each other, and the river flows through a narrow canyon, the south bank of which rises to a considerable height, but the north does not rise more than 50 feet above the nater level. The rock forms a cliff on either side and extends across the river forming a bar, on the upstream side a conriderable quantity of gravel has been deposited, the water drops about 2 feet in 50 at this point, a drop of nearly a foot occurring where it passes over the bar. The limiting feature of any storage scheme at this point is the height of the rock on the north side; approximately 45 feet above the present water level would be the limiting height to which the water could be raised. Considerable fall in the water level exists at the entrance to this canyon, so that 40 feet would probably be the depth that could be obtained in the valley at the mouth, and the rise in the river would not admr" of backing the water up for more than a mile, with a structure of this height. The r On the Minnewanka diagram are two lines, the lower shows the effect of the 44,000 ac.-feet available at 12 foot storage (the odd 700 feet is deducted to allow for waste), while the upper s^ .*s the effect of the 16-foot storage obtamed by drawing the lake down to its original level 136 rtEPARTMEST Of' THE ISTKHIOH 6 GEORGE v., A. 1916 which was raiswl 4 feet some years ago by a dam at the outlet of the lake. A diagram show'g the continued effect of the storage upon the flow of the river at .-seshoe falls (see diagram, Plate No. 17) has also been prepared. is is based upon a storage capacity of 257,300 acre-feet, and after «ing for losses it is considered that 245,200 acre-feet will be available , „■ ugmenting the minimum flow; the diagram is based upon the mean monthly flows and is for the period 1909-12, and was compiled from tables Nos. 21, 22 and 23. which are based upon the run-off data for the low water seasons of 190&.10, 1910-11, 1911-12, and show the effect of storage upon the discharge of the Bow river at Kananaskis falls. It will bo seen that at the lowest season discharge of 1,500 second-feet can be secured. BOW niXEIt POWKR .4.V0 STOHAflH SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« e 137 A i S 05 H ■< E" o 0, < M o A ! 8 ^ ^ •T V 1 < § ,*: :.' ^ T V i < s < ;.* ^ ^ V < 2 - ^ ^ ^ 1 X ^ lot^ r««S«i 2g g95s — ft S'SSV: IS §glS -r S ^^- X i Sis t<5 — M* 8|8 5S2 s g^iss^riss ^- IIS Is ?fs i JJ 2 Z- 2 >> 5 a * a - e= 5 •si 11 Sit ' - s Til lb ■r- = '-.a \ a s- ^ .5 B j! «■= = 5 s— S c I- ->.-■ >.>... >, J^ £= *2*c2iS - •-. H — T. — ■/. T. r- ■/. c a = s * - 1 it i.', -»•' ^ C ?.- il ii i" >, — = -• s* s X 138 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 6 QEORQE v., I BOW RIVER POWER AND BTORAOB 1» SESSIONAL PAPER No. 35« w d H A •< H OS 2 O < H 02 H O ■< PS o H O P o Si c •T I J ; < ry 1 — IS =s|i ii •a oot«oo SSSS saas i 3i ;BI§ I a ssl§ :§ iisi 22SR3 i' §i ISg§ i^ ^ § S r^-ulf.S " e « a, llll ■^ ♦* ♦* *; Soo :* 00 e ill ill I at* 8.1 JSif (£2 ^i i;5. -a It ~ eg sg 140 DEPARTMENT OF THE ISTERIOIt Tables 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 In preparing the tables Nos. 21, 22, 23, the effect to be obtained from storage js taken as that due to a discharge of 160,000 acre-feet from the proposed bpray basm, 27,000 acre-feet from the Bow lake basin and 44,000 acre-feet from lake Mmnewanka. In addition to this, there can be made available at lake 4 728 and"4 724 °'"^**" ^^'"^^ acre-feet between the present normal lake level, EXFLANATION. The tables give the necessary quantity in cubic feet per second, an.i in acre-feet, required to raise the mean monthly flow from that recorded to dis- charges, ranging from 800 c.f.s. to 1.500 c.f.s. At the bottom of each column IS given the mean flow for the low-water period, together with the total in acre- teet lecessary to produce the given discharge for the period. Below the table i« given the effect m concise form, of the flow from each storage basin upon the discharge and finally the combined effect of all the storage basins upon the For the low-water period 1909-10, the mean discharge for the period for an average month i.s 1,025 c.f.s. With this as a basis, from the table -e find that providing for a flow of 1,500 c.f.s. over the low-water period, November to April inclusive, there wi 1 be a surplus of 60,938 acre-feet, without making use of the extra storage available m Minnewanka, or including 14,200 acre-feet auxiliarv storage, a total of 75,138 acre-feet, sufficient to provide for a flow of 1705 c f s over the whole period. « i ■. . For the low-water period 1910-11, the mean discharge is 1.124 c f s over the wlH.le period. As before, providing for a continuous flow of 1,500 c.f.s 'over this period, there IS a surplus (omitting as before the auxiliarv .storage) of 75 545 acre-feet, or includmg the 14,200 acre-feet auxiliarv storage a total of 89*745 acre-teet, which wouK! give a continuous flow from October to April, of 1804 .. fl ?"r1'^Jil*' V^. ''^^'V^- ^^"^ ""■"" ''•™' '^^ "»'>• 833 c.f.s., and to secure .1 now ot 1,500 c.f.s., the entire storage capacity, including th.' auxiliarv 14 200 acre-feet, a total of 245,200 acre-t. , t would have to be utilized. " 1 -,»r. *"" ^^^'' Hwe>^ it seems reasonably certain therefore that a flow of l.om second-feet canbemaiatained; during s.asons of uausuallv low water this may possibly not be realized, and records over a longer period" would give the conclusions drawn, more weight, but in the absence of more .-omplete information this How has been accepted as reasonably certain and it is tlie discharge uron based ^*'^'<''«P'n™*« between Horseshoe falls and (Ihost river have been Below the mouth of the (ihost these figures are increased: from tic data available it seems reasonable to expect a minimum flow of 100 cubic f.et wt second during the low-water period, from this river, so that the minimum regu- lated flow should • increase.1 to 1.600 c.f.s. for jioints below the mouth of that For the low ter sea.son, October Lst to March 31. 1911-12, from the lirecipitation dat; . is found that the precipitation was less than for anv season (luring the last eight years, and the total precipitation f<.r the water vear" 1911-12 was just 0.38 inch higher than the mean flow over a period of sixteen vears I lie above a.ssumptum reganling discharge in view of this seems reasonable! Effect below Calgaky. Melow Calgary, the effect of storage cm the Klbow wouM l)e aiiparent- Hi.' amount of storage on this river is taken at 23,000 acre-feet, giving a total ayailal)le storage for points below Calgary of 208.200 acre-feet. Diagram Plate •No. 18 has been plotted: it gives the mean monthlv discharge in acre-feet »city. 27>>0O A«ar«-f— ^ ■ Stprte Tab Wl3 Cn«i pll«d from M^asui- MHianta m»4» «i Moni.BV ■RiD«> ••• MOI WM MO g r*u« ahewin g cwiditiow und«r» eontinuou* flow of WOO »«e ft b« M.C.H«iidfY. R con»t>nt Di«ehT | » of 200 StC- Iii3 100000 ^AH 0T« n^yijL^ail « L>t n, ,v-^-52;0 9 j,4 5 -f^ff"-':-^ '*-' ^^\rs .DOS >o «aiM9*a irwiljuje?.j»-:'.?J V-»-4J^ ---' -•'^ r^i !1 e , .«i;e5,Tt ■ r- . 6 7000Q •OOOO^ H;-* ^iii \ '^i>p I ► "m il m I .1 ,M TtOOO Bifi PLATE XIX BOW RIVER DJMriffi ai<«aiiM Di«cti»»M « in Aew ft, fraw Jmn.WO to P». 1? balow W»cordeffi ll undir « eowtinuoMB flow of Hao Cubic Ft.p ySac. !>_— fwi gw irt m Nt »«< I n i n II t CI H i — bJtfiJtotv._lJLfc liffll -- wit Ijffj F ^«.^LCATK KX BgW RIVIR >r MOWSWMtg .„ KAMAfl^p^.. Priod. Um^ lOffQ Id Aaril Iffg. H««d - 70 ft- 80% Efficiefiev by M.C.H«ndrY .a*Sc NgiE. RMUl«t«i fW». of Rivr i, »a,|| - Wnl««.with ■UMJIi^ry - f 11 t4 ';j'i »WATK KM Skfi: PqwKH - f%»€SgNT^a»^ c^ -yi l ffc ^"■"MM BOV»WtVg» ^T ■om-rpffT F!aaLrMwl>Ud frnm I ■nd FV— nt 1^*mmneir% .wiM — ^iLaftJtelaJfefit-i ntaf« of Tim* •iMkawathMalM aOW RIVER POWMR ASD STORAQS ,^, SESSIONAL PAPEM N^ 26. fcoMSiKlStS'fhfe7e:t*Sf% l«i^l912. Diagram Calgary and amount necessarTto secuJn fow oM"fln°° J^* ^"'^ "^«' below dijgram reveals the fact that reiulatl^t f)». T* ^'^ <'•/•'' * ^t^dy «' this a flow of 200 c.f.8. at the ste below cSonorpir^Vf. *^* ^^^""^ *» "^^ure from Kananaakia falls would rivJa Kof «««; "'^ ^^^ "*?'"'«•' "» tJ>« Bow Calgarv. It is apparent from thidii^aST hL?^^"*!"?*?'?' ^'^^ '^fo- below bv at feaat 200. c.f.s., dueTthe t^T;^Z Zo't^^^ W^ be exceeded of which there is no record durmg the Xo^i^^^^th,^""^ ^'^"'^ *^^ ^'>'»*' CONCLUSION. Effect of Storage on Discharge. lake feetanK StrlfS?'i°'j""ftL^"'* - '^"^"'^'y storage at tamed oyer the low-wateVperiJ?o?an; lZ°l^^ second-feet may be main- mouth of the Gh«,t river; duSg yeaK^'rSfnr^*" Kananaskis falls and the as high as 1,700 c.f.s. * ^ ordinary precipitation, this may go ^yJfZiX'^S, ?r *i;?rr rS>« "«t!,^ flow may be increased 1,600 c.f.s. would be'avai Jllrr^i^sSS t^tt ^J^^tZS^ t BowbStwii*li5„ranrfi!L'°/u.S^^ «* --ks tributary to the and including the regSed floHf thTElLnw'''"fl ' "°,"**^«' b"* belo7calga?J be expected during the low wSr period ' ^""^ °^ ""^"'y ^,000 c.f.s. may Effect of Storage on Power Output. prepa^ed'feSi'^^^^^^^^ ^^ "^^41^^^"' ^^^ — -« been available storage in the ba^inVdeveloDtd aJd nnH^"'^ i^^^f^ct of the total producing of the river. These curSa ^rp ^?-J*^*l*''^'°P1**^ "PO^ the power and proposed and are kno^ L'^Power-S^!,!^"' each of the plants built period for which they are plotted is f rmT m^ ^.S!^*® °' *™e curves." The practically all the rSs aSble Th^y'r^' *%^P."l' »912, embracing whee horse-power, and the aS^; tile Z^^ .""^ *be curves represent equal to the period riven above Tw^ „ ' *° Peycentagcs, 100 per cent beinir that derived from thTnatur^ flow d^nrth?'' P'".^*^^, on. .„ a full line ^ from the regulated flow "* *be penoc. and the broken line that ^A^j'rSi fo \ZTr^l Sd' r "^r ^'"^ ^«"^ -d K— kia under a head of 70 felt and^trio^J 'f'^^be natural flow of theriver be derived from the iStural Sw of th^riv^r^!^'''"'^' *be power that coulS be 28,000 wheel horse-iwwe^ tL? H„. » .t ^* "^^ '^^'^^ of the period, would would be 21.400 whl^Cr^^ *tt WhVe th'^^"^^*.' 1 ^^"S ^°' *be sametiSS natura flow, the power deriSKless and whljL th.^***'^ Ao^ » ««» than the denved is greater; for 100 per cent olthJn!-^^!^"™" " K"***' tbe Power duce about 4,580 wheel hoVa^^L I ?^"'^ *be natural flow would oro- 9,545 wheel horse-pSe^ thattsKourlwe; '^fif.'*'^ '"^ """^^ P'oC P^^t-^Pdrto-ffre^e-^^^^^^ 142 DEPARTMEST OF TBB IKTEBIOB 6 GEORGE v., A. 191S power years. With the proposed regulated flow this could be increased by 1,863 horse-power years, giving a total annual output of 9,964 horse-power years. For the Horseshoe Falls plant the same curve applies, the head and regu- lated flow being the same. Here, however, the turbine installation is greater, being 19,500 horse-power from the curve, it will be seen that the total annual output due to the natural flow would be 12,087 horse-power years, to which may be added, due to stream regulation, 2,171 horse-power years, giving the total annual output of 14,258 horse-power years. The other curves for the undeveloped sites are worked out on the same basis and the results are tabulated in table No. 5 so that further explanation is hardly necessary. Auxiliary Storage. Where the main storage basins are so remote from the point of utilization as in the Bow basin, some auxiliary storage of sufficient capacity to tide the plant over a sudden drop in the flow is necessary. The amount of storage that may be developed in connection with each plant is rather limited, the river is con- fined mainly between high banks so that any increase in level produces a very small increase in area; this is especially the case at the present plant at Horse- shoe falls; from the dam to the foot of Kananaskis falls the banks are high and the present flooded area is but little in excess of the former area of the river. At Horseshoe falls the area of the pond above the plant is 98 . 5 acres which, with a draw down of 4 feet, has a capacity of 394 acre-feet, capable of support- ing a discharge of 200 second-feet for twenty-four hours; this might be suf- ficient over a short period, but is of little value when a reduction of flow takes place. At such a time it becomes necessary to sustain the flow for the eighteen to twenty-four hours which must elapse before the effect of storage above can be felt. The Horseshoe Falls plant is, of all the developments built or proposed, the least favourably situated in this regard. The plant at present building at Kananaskis, though better situated, has very little advantage in respect to storage area. When the elevations of the structure are finally settled, the depth of storage possible may be found to be in excess of that at the Horseshoe Falls plant, but with a draw down of 4 feet as before, and a pond area above the dam of 122.25 acres, a total of 489 acre-feet would be available; this would provide a flow of 258 second-feet for twenty-four hours. The drawing down of the head-water, however, makes a serious inroad upon the output of the plant; the storage propositions looked into on the Kananaskis river within a radius of 8 or 10 miles of Kananaskis falls have been made with a view to eliminating this trouble as much as possible. An examination was made of the Kananaskis river during the summer of 1912, to investigate the possibility of creating storage in lake Chiniki by damming the river and raising the water to a sufficient height to flow into the lake, to be there stored until needed. It was found that it would be necessary to go a long way upstream to raise the water to the desired height, and also that to return the water to the river it would be necessary to re-traverse or cut through a height of land between the lake and the river; this would involve considerable work, as the summit, though not high, is long. There are several possible dam sites within a distance of 8 miles from the mouth of the river, at which the water might be raised 40 or 50 feet; the amount of storage these would create would be small, and only a survey in detail would reveal the value of the several basins so created; these were dealt with before. The other proposed developments are rather better situated than the present two, the area of the ponds at these several sites are as follows: — BOW RIVER POWER AKD BTORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Pondage Area above each Plant, 143 Table No. 24. Site. Fund Area. Bow Fort Hiaaion. . . , 2** acre*. Hadnor •■;■■;;;:;:::;;:::::::;:::::::::::;:;::::::::;::::::::: 24? •• In connection with the Ghost and Radnor sites, the question of storage on the Ghost nver was looked into. A possible storage basin of small area near the mouth of the nver, and of which plans accompany this report, was developed in some detail; the site, however, is not considered attractive as the capacity tor storage is limited and the structure involved large. Ice Conditions below Storage Basins. Ra„«^* the end of last winter an examination was made of the river between a^f.r Kananaskis falls; also of the Cascade river between lake Minnewanka and the mouth, and the Spray nver for about 8 miles from the mouth A number of photographs were taken to iUustrate ice conditions found at different points on the nvers, some of these are reproduced here. Between Kananaskis falls and the mouth of the Cascade the Bow. when .T.Ti ' """ «°,' *HS''''i P*'* ?Rf°' ""•* '° " ^""^ Pl*"*" o»ly «^-« there evidence of overflow. Below the Spray fa Is on the Bow, where the formation of fra«il W(m!d be excessive, there was httle evidence of clogging and overflow the river bemg entirely confined to the channels. On the Spray river, asTar rT^S the same conditK'>s obtained; for the first 4 miles above the mouth, SfS was entirely ice U.und, above that point the river was open in many p aces, and. although some overflow had occurred, the nmount was so small that it was practically neghgible. >■»•»» On the Cascade, the conditions encountered were somewhat different Between the storage dam and Bankhead, the river was practically clear of ice." and there was no evidence of the formation of any large quantity. This con- dition showed a reversal of the conditions found in March, 1912, for after a certain amount of water had l>een discharged from the lake in 1913, large quan- n fLl'^f r'V°"°** "P°,° *^^ «?ts bolow Bankhead, and these extended neX ♦^ iSi^ * '^ •^^° T."^' P'f ^Ithis ice was in fields, 4 and 5 feet thick, and 400 to 600 feet wide; below the Canadian Pacific Railway bridge the ice was in even greater quantities and much thicker. ^ " *u These conditions were due largely to the nature of the river bed, and also the method of releasing the water Trom storage. During the earirnart of an^ .?„ •^it""^' "?'~'' ""'*. *"'''/ 4°"^**^ d""»8 -evere weather by f ra«l and anchor ice; when water was rcleasea, the choking of the channels increased, and aSm and consequent ice formation took place. Reproductions, pages 19 20 24 and 25 illustrate the resulting conditions. ^^ ' ' ^ Storage Manipulation. i. on?lL''"*'*'°° °' regulation of discharge from the different storage basins IS one requinng care and experience. During the first few years of operaUoa t .8 not expected that they can be operated to secure the maidSi^ eX enc"? though regulation should improve as the amount of data is inrrewed!^ emnency mK — Il| 144 DSPAMTMBlfT OF TBB IVTMBtOK B QEOROE v.. A. 191 » M I I BOW MTfSM POWER AND 8T0SA0E 145 SESSIONAL PAPER Ho. 25* The comparative remoteness of the several storage basins from the power- producing sections of the river, prevents any close regulation of the flow at the planta, for it is estimated that it will take at least 18 hours before water released from Minnewanka will reach Kananaskis Falls. During the last winter, owing to the difficulty of anticipating temperature changes (the controlling factor), water released from Minnewanka did not reach the plant until the extreme conditions due to the weather had partially adjusted themselves; also, a large percentage of the water was wasted in transit, especially in the upper part of the river near the basin, in the form of ice. It is scarcely fair, however, to use the first season of regulation as a basis for reaching definite conclusions as to the benefits to be secured, for it must be remembered that, besides lack of experience in handling the storage, other things militated against maximimi efficiency; for instance, between Bankhead and the mouth of the Cascade, no improvement to the river bed has been made, thus much of the water released spreads over the flats, freezes and is wasted. Diagram, Plate No. 3 shows not only the marked influence of temperature upon discharge, but also shows when and to what extent storage was supplied, for the recorded levels indicate the discharge indirectly; it may safely be assumed that when the surface level remains constant there is no discharge, and when the lake level falls, water is being discharged from storage; also the rate of decrease in the lake level indicates the rate of discharge. The wasting of water by ice formation on the flats, as mentioned above, is due, in a very great measure, to the method of storage manipulation. A study of other rivers in the vicinity during the past season has led to the conclusion that if the channel is kept open, little clogging and overflow occur. It will be noted in nearly every case, that for a varying length of time, immediately preceding a period of low temperature, and during the first part of that period, the flow from storage was that of the normal flow of the river. Later, the water released from storage met with a condition in the river, a channel restricted and clogged with ice, the result being an overflow and excessive ice formation in the river valley. The opinion is advanced that, under the normal conditions of the river, or where the normal discharge is fairly large and constant the ice troubles will be ve-.y appreciably reduced. It is therefore expected that, with the building of a power plant upon the Cascade, immediately below the storage dam, and the consequent nearly con- stant discharge, the channel will be kept in fair condition, which will go far to eliminate the trouble. The discharge from Spray Lake basins will take even longer to reach the plants, so that any attempt at regulation would Le of httle benefit; it is therefore proposed in regard to that basin to keep the flow fairly constant during the low water period, and do any necessary regulation near the plants. A fairiy large flow or discharge from Spray lakes will, ii is expected, elimin- ate, to a very great extent, the trouble and losses due to ice. During the last winter season, the liver was examined for a distance of about 8 miles, and while the flow was fairly large, the amount of ice formed was comparatively small, onl> at two or three points in the section examined was there evidence of block- mg and overflow; these were of very small extent. The manipulation of the proposed Bow lake storage presents further diffi- culties, but by special treatment these may be overcome. To attempt to secure a continuous (Uscharge from that source throughout the winter months, would mean practically the entire loss of the value of the storage, the nature of the channel through which the water flows being very simi- lar to that of the Cascade for nearly the entire length above Laggan. In order that the maximum benefit may be secured from this basin, it is proposed to 1« DBPAKTMEjfT or TBS mTEHlOR Pq^ WTE ' Flow riB g ulaf d from rVo o ot»l and P ' w nt R—rvoir* . w^^;^;!'^^^^^*;^*:;^ s;«^^;sf^ 5^*^;S'^;j^^ \^"^^^^«^<;^«^!>^};^^«;s:«5«^S!«¥5«S!^^ P«rc«nt«g« a m.ATc mil POWKW- PkHOKWTAO«^ pit Tiijg CunvK« BOW RIVEB >T miMloirPOiWEH 8ITt TotyfOWRaair tiwrt on P<»wr«tif P>»s KKW owKH • Pkwckwta^ k or Timk Cuwvf _3? TwiTZ ■ow RivEW i«r CMorr ^wtw site pe riod ■ M»^ 1809 to April 112 . H»ad . 50 "t.. 80%Eff»oi«ncy — tw M.C.H»wlrv . ».Sc. _ '/- VA ■ , %^JX ■-™i-'. MM ■ •0« i PkATC XXIV MOTE ' R agul^tod flow of Ri<»r m r—ult Storag* PovwEW • Perccntaok or Timk Cunvcy or THt BOW RIVER AT RADMOW POWCB Siyg P»riod. May laO fl to AtwJI 1812 . Head . 44 ft . 80% Efrici«ncv To accom pany w Mor t on Pn i m iii m n n ^ |i iM| | || | l i|i|| b» MjC. Hl^rY aikjo . P«re«ntag« of Tim* BCVr RIVBR POWBM AJiD STOBAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26« 147 CHAPTER XII. IRRIGATION. General. From time to time irriRation has ««» ^^^^'^^Snierous other small ««-hemes scheme being on Fish creek f « ;.'\f (g^ S an «^dertaking of any magnU were instituted, but it was not »""',]^^^**^'e those of the Calgary Hydrauho was b^gun. The tw«, largest X' 'SbTriver weTof Calgary, and the Calgary Company, with head-works on t^e Elbow nver ^^^ ^^^^^^ y,y the Irrigation Company, ^^ose head-works ^reai ^^^^.^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^l „^„^ber end of 1894 there were projects of all aaes » i the Calgary Hydraulic Company. ^.m^.^v Company became an active About 1905 the Canadian Pacific ^''*'^>^„^^ ^^ieh, at present is the advocate of irrigation, and •""^'^^.^i^^^Jti^, ^dertaking in the Canadian Wgest .md most comprehensive '^•^^'''^'^'Xw the junction of the Bow and W^V a main channel with head-works just ^elow tne j^ ^^ Calgary. a risers carries -f^^^Xi^^^^^^^^^'^''. ''^ ^Tl^ ""■ while the principal ""dertal^^ng is tartner ^^^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^^l,,^ ,a„a. gtructed a large dam near Bassano to .er RKL.TION OK POWKH SS. IbHIOXT.ON RK.mKKMENTS. n is well to recogni. that th.;agi^ura. i^stry, gh jts a«an. int.^_i, discovered that instead of were pr-t-ecKled with and broadened >^ "'^ ^ >,,thcr a co-operative effect. Inv interference there wa. -m <» 'f^^;;^ S',vlll equally assist both power o". the broad principle that ="»• ^!^'[."«' [if .-ater for their requirements, poduction and irrigation "' ^"^P^^i^'X^ ^ It is obviouMt.at there can be "" ';;/,^J;,^'^,,,,u„hout the spring and ;»'<""'"•, equitably .outrolleds.. as t., be mifrmtl^^^^^^^^^^ ^^.^^ throughout wha ' For unately the requirements or -rng' ^.^,^^ commencing not propose-.' nev r.gulatcd flrrw ol l,.-«i' 148 DEPARTUETiT OF THE INTERIOR S GEORGE v.. A. 1915 of the withdrawal of water by storage on the high summer flood, cannot be such as to interfere with efficient irrigation; on the contrary, provision is made for the future, because such a large supply cannot be maintained throughout the entire irrigable season, and the month of April is much improved by storage while September remains as before. Under any circumstances, during the operations of water control and supply from storage reservoirs, the requirements of irrigation should be kept clearly in mind, and in the face of a threatened shortage, the reasonable demands of irrigation must be given precedence. 25l— p. 149 Kaowiask Kiuuuiaakia I'Ms Dun. riiolo by K. H. Smith. 6 ( 6 OEORQE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. SSe A. 19tB APPENDIX I. RECOMMENDATIONS RE A POLICY OF STORAGE AND REGULATION ON THE BOW RIVER. ■r C. H. MITCHELL, C.E. U9 ;t I f 6 QEORQE V. BOW KIVeR POWER AND 8TORA0W SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« Ifti A. 191S RECOMMENDATIONS RE POLICY OF STORAGE AND REGULATION ON THE BOW RIVER. vBy C. H. Mitchell, C.E.) March 31, 1914. J. B. Challieh, Esq., Superintendent of Water Power Branch, Department of the Interior, Ottawa. Dear Sir,— In concluding my investigations and study of the Bow river and its basin with respect to water supply, storage and regulation of discharge, I have the following to bring to your attention. This report embraces recom- mendations and suggestions for giving practical effect to the conclusions which we have reached. Scope. The conclusions herein contained have reference to the water supply question solely with respect to the regulation and control of the river so as to equalize the discharge in the most advantageous manner for power purposes keeping in mind the requirements of irrigation. General. If the country in the foot-hills east of the Rockies and within transmission radius of the Bow river is to be encouraged as an industrial region, the utiliza- tion of its natural resources is an economic necessity and the utmost develop- ment of the water power of the Bow river is a logical outcome. In this region there are already rapidly-growing industrial commimities and their steady growth is dependent on probably no more important factor than an ample supply of power. The Bow river is peculiar in that, in its natural condition, its high summer- flood discharge is upwards of seventy times its low-water winter discharge, a condition which obviously renders its use, in its present state, unsuitable, inefficient and commercially unfeasible for power purposes. The investigations which have been carried on during the past two years, the results of which have been embodied in the general report of Mr. Hendry and in which I have collaborated, indicate that if the Bow river is to be an efficient commercial source of power and at the same time to afford all ample water supply for irrigation purposes it is absolutely necessary that the river be regulated and controlled so as to ensure a fixed and useful supply of water con- tinuously throughout the year. Conditions to be Met. If the improvement of Bow river is undertaken for the advantage of the power and irrigation industries it is obvious that it should be done by, and remain under the control of, tlie Government because of the many conflicting interests of water demand which would be involved. In addition to the irri- -Kaooon moumoN tbt cnait (ANSI and rSO TEST CHAUT No. 2) A ^«d under theCa^^^ Br.nnhTi'irt'""'"" "^i"® work which has been carried on by the Water Power Branch on the Bow nver dunng the past two years, the results of which are nTw being pubhshed, constitutes practically the who e of the inveXation nre hminary to the undertaking of this project. So far as it has been'Sssrble f n carry this investigation up to the present, it is reasonably complSrSni the development of a definite policy to be laid down penamg the Some of the data upon which the general project is based, beinir obtained from various sources, have by necessity been meagre because of the short Sod over which the investigations have been made. It has been necessary to em ploy data which were originally made for other purposes and Sthanoth^; viewpoint, whilst on the other hand, if data obtained TspecaHy for this nu^Z ^ri.^? account of the foregoing, it appears now to be necessarv to continue the periodic collection of data and to further investigate the perforaance of the Tnt'/r^r ni*' tributaries so that as time goes on, whether acKal cTnstruction il entered upon or not, a continuous cycle of records becomes avaHable Th s tr^b fnr^H'';j'^"*''"''^'*'^**°= ^^^ ^i^" K'^"'^"*"' """'e especially on he sepamte wlters and S^a'^hffilS 7^t' T^^^^^^ '" "«^ stations nearer thetd! waters and at a higher altitude; (3 temperature records at the same stations- It 18 also of the greatest importance that, after operation of the storaue works 18 commenced, a careful study and analysis be maJTof hViM-rformantc ,7^^^^ oTr'^rivrattS-iiraT'd"^^^^^ months and ?he othir ^nl^T"''? "**"""« ^KVating operations in the winter BOW RIVER POWER AJiD BTORAQE 163 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26« B. — Cr,n8truction. — The construction work involved in this project in its entirety, in accordance with the report, comprises storage and regulating dams on: — 1. Lake Minnewanka. 2. Bow lake 3. Spray River canyon (Spray lakes). In order to carry this whole project to its logical conclusion, it is evident that the construction of these reservoirs should be undertaken as a Government work in the same manner as the Government constructs other public improvements for the benefit of the locality or the country at large. This undertaking has a strong point in its favour, in that the Government can very rigfatly recover the whole or a portion of the cost of the work in the form of annual rentals charged to the various users for the additional water thus supplied. These rentals can be adjusted amongst the various power companies or power sites in the leases given by the department, and be recoverable with the annual power rentals. The basis of water charge can be adjusted either according to quantity of water used or to power produced, arranged on some equitable scale. The first of the foregoing works has already been constructed and was finished in time to catch the 1912 summer flood; the performance of this reservoir and its regulation during the past winter has been made the subject of con- siderable study and will form the basis of the further investigations which I hayt suggested above. This reservoir with its accessory works was constructed at the expense of the Calgary Power Company with an arrangement whereby the Government may take it over at cost at any time in the future, and on this account the work was done under the supervision of the Government's engineers and accepted by them with a view to its ultimately becoming a part of the proposed storage and regulation system. In this respect, therefore, the way 18 already prepared for carrying out the Governmental policy outlined above. CO-OPIERATION. As has already been stated, it is necessary to the success of the project that the operation of the storage and regulation be solely under the control of the Government. The authority could best be vested in an engineer located on the ground, say at Banff, who would apportion the water and adjudicate between the users and he, through his several assistants, would actually carry out this process from day to day or week to week as the occasion might arise. These operations would apply to water for irrigation purposes as well as for power. In addition to these duties of regulation, this Engineer would also be charged with continuing and collecting the various data and information already outlined consequent upon operation. The cost of up-keep and maintenance of the works, as well as the expense of the actual operation of the regulation by the Government, can be apportioned yearly amongst the various users in the same manner as already outlined for repayment of the construction cost. Recommendations. In conclusion, and in accordance with the foregoing I have the following commendations to offer as being designed to meet the general conditions; — 1. That the investigations on the Bow River basin be continued for the purpose of maldng the data more complete and useful in the subsequent operation of the project. 2. That the Government undertake the further construction of storage reservoirs and regulating works and provide for the repayment of their cost by means of annual rentals charged to users of water. 154 DEPARTMENT OF TBE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., a 191S terms of the existing agreement with the Power Company. Yours very truly, C. H. MITCHELL. r I > 11 i 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« A. 1916 APPENDIX II PROPOSED DAM AT SPRAY LAKES REPORT BT fj. R. G. CONWAY, C.E. I5S ^ I I t : 5 QEOROE V. BOW RITEB POWER AND STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e 157 A. 1915 REPORT PROPOSED DAM AT SPRA\ RIVER, B.C. (Bt G. R. G. Conway, C.E.) To J. B. Challies, Esq., Superintendent, Water Power Branch, Department of the Interior, Ottawa. Vancouver, B.C., April 6, 1914. Proposed Dam at Sprat River, British Columbia. Sib, — In accordance with your request, I have reviewed the available data that you have obtained with regard to the possibilities of constructing a storage dam at the Spray River canyon in Alberta. The construction of a dam with a proposed maximum height of 100 feet in a place so remote from rail transportation involves the consideration of several points that are of extreme importance when considering the subject from the economical standpoint. The diflSculties of access to the site and high cost of materials that may require to be transported to that site, makes it imperative to select a type of dam that while absolutely safe shall be constructed at the lowest cost. From careful consideration of the data available with regard to vhe proposed location, I believe, subject to further investigation as to the foundation conditions, that a dam can be safely constructed there either of concrete masonry, rock-fill, or of earth work, the latter either of the ordinary type or constructed by the hydraulic-fill method. To determine the approximate cost of a concrete dam designed either as a gravity dam or one of the arch type, much careful exploration work by means of test pits and diamond drill borings is absolutely necessary; but after taking into consideration the high cost of cement and materials, and the diflacuJty of transporting the large amount of plant necessary for its construction a distance of 30 miles from the Canadian Pacific Railway, it is obvious that an approximate estimate, bajed upon reasonable assumptions with regard to foundation con- ditions makes it necessary to dismiss a proposal for a concrete dam from practical consideration. I have, though, made an approximate estimate of the cost of a typical gravity dam for the purpose of comparison with other types. From the general geological character of the canyon, the type of dam most suitable for the location is either one of a rock-fill type or an earthen dam, preferably of the hydraulic-fill type. Rock-fill Dam.— A dam of the best rock-fill type, such, for example, as the Morena dam in California, is quite feasible and entirely suitable for the site, and satisfactory rock could be quarried at a convenient elevation so that the material could be handled by gravity at an economical figure. This type, how- ever, involves the use of large quantities of concrete for obtaining a water- tight upstream face, and considerable plant to handle the rock ■ ' onomically, and, in ac^ '.tion, its construction would be prolonged over se al seasons. An approximate estimate shows, too, that its cost is prohibitive. Earth Dam. — From a consideration of the materials available r.t the site at a suitable elevation so as to be economically placed in the dam, I am of the opinion that a dam of the hydraulic-fill type which has been proposed is the most suitable and economical one to adopt. 25e— 12 ^99 DEPARTMEyr OF THE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 This type has already been adopted in building two large dams in British Columbia, one a dam 1 ,000 feet long and 60 feet high at Bear creek, Vancouver island, for the Vancouver Island Power Company, where the construction of the dam had to be carried on in a very inaccessible region and under severe winter conditions, and the other a dam at the outlet of Coquitlam lake, for the Vancouver Power Company. The latter dam is 99 feet high and contains nearly 600,000 cubic yards of material. Both of these dams have been built of glacial drift, and in the case of Coquitlam a homogeneous dam of clay con- crete of an excellent character was obtained. In my opinion the glacial clays of British Columbia aiford the very finest material for constructing a satis- factory dam if the materials are graded with skill, and are infinitely superior to clays of a purer and richer character. From a consideration of the samples that were examined by Mr. G. L. Albert, it appears that a satisfactory grading of materials could be obtained for forming an impervious core. The chief difficulty, in my opinion, however, is in the apparent scarcity of heavy boulders for the outer slopes, a scarcity which may, however, be overcome by quarrying quantities of rock near the site for incorporation with the sluiced material. In constructing a dam of the height proposed, which is well below the limit of the height of a number of other similar dams that have been successfully completed, great care must be taken to ensure the provision of ample rock toes of Cyclopean rubble, and at the same time to limit the amount of fine impervious material in the centre of the dam only to what is necessary to ensure water tightness. In the construction of the Necaxa dam No. 2 in Mexico, a dam 190 feet in height, the preponderance of rich clays and fine impervious material was the cause of serious disaster, and in the reconstruction of that dam, as actually built, the rock toes were so heavy and massive that the proportion of impervious material was reduced considerably beyond that called for in the original design; in fact, the revised design differs in very many important essentials from that as originally published.' The lessons learned from the pprt- ial failure of the Necaxa dam are very instructive, and must be borne in mind in designing dams of the hydraulic-fill type. The available materials for the hydraulic-fill at the Spray canyon appear to me iyj be eminently satisfactory for obtaining a properly graded fill through- out tht Jtiajor portion of the dam. The proportions of sand and gravel are such that a proper drainage of the interior mass i an be obtained so that the stability of the w'f ole can be secured. The material appears to be lacking in large boulders of rock, but the proximity to the dam location of an excellent site for quarrying limestone rock will enable large quantities to be secured if neces- bary at an economicpl cost for the outer or more porous section of the dam so as to increase its stability. From the general character of the rock, it wou'd appear possible to break it up with black powder into comparatively smail fragments and convey it by sluicing to the dt.m. After ci» efuUy studying the available information, I have proposed in the sketch attached hereivith the main outline of a suitable maximum cross-section of the dam. Further information should be available before the exact founda- tion conditions are settled, and I would recommend that a series of test pits be sunk along the ctatr j fine of the proposed dam. The base of the dam for a distance of 400 feet along the river bed should be thoroughly cleaned to expose bedrock, and the whole of the site should be thoroughly cleared of all roots, stumps, and loose material, and a core wall of concrete, carried well into the bedrock across the river-bed and stepped up the side slopes, is, in my judgment, necessary to obtain a perfectly water-tight seal between the joint rock and the imperviou« material ; but there is no necessity for this core wall being carried more than 4 to 6 feet high above the rock level. ' .*e obtained in so short a dam. If the total quantity of material to be placed in the dam, amounting to approximately 500,000 cubic yards, excluding the rock toes, two shifts daily of ten hours each, at an average of 1,500 cubic yards, will mean eleven months' work distributed over two work- ing seasons. It is advisable during the winter months to close down the work entirely, otherwise the cost would be excessive. I have proposed that the up- stream slope shoulJ be heavily riprapped, and near the crest the riprapping should be grouted or laid in cement so as to prevent wave action (which will probably be^ cof «>= "erahle), from damaging the dam at high-water line. In mnel, I believe a spillway having a capacity of not less second should be provided on the west bank, as this • discharged under flood conditions with a full reservoir, ..t the intake tower at the same time. This spillway .own to the level of the rock, and if necessary a concrete wall carried across so as to bring it to the required level, and a channel excavated, ^r a retaining wall built, so as to prevent the water overflowing on to the down- stream .'ftce of the dam. The exact location of the spillway and channel can be determined when locating the borrow pits so as to reduce the excavation as much as possible. The design of the intake tower and the construction of the tunnel presents no difficulties. Duplicate sets of valves of the Stoney pattern similar to those in use at the Coquitlan-Buntzen tunnel can be easily adapted for control pur- poses. I have given careful consideration to the cost of building this dam, and believe the hydraulic-fill type can be constructed at a considerably less cost than any other type. One of the principal items involved, viz., that of sluicing the hydraulic-fill, varies considerably in different dams. At Bear creek, .Jordan river, where 160,000 cubic yards were placed in position by the hydraulic method, the cost, including plant, etc., amounted to 49}4 cents per cubic yard; at the Coquitlam dam the labour cost varied in different months between ten cents and 25e— 12i addition to the than 12,000 cu, quaniitymigh and a possible should be excav, %m DBPARTMEyr OF TBB IVTERIOR QEORQE v., A. 191 S twenty-two cents a cubic yard; the average labour cost, including the con- struction of flumes, their removal, etc., during the whole period of sluicing 460,000 cubic yards was 17 cents; the average cost, including plant, pumping, power (electric energy charged \4 cent per k.w.h.) and supermtendence was 29 cents per cubic yard. The convenient position of the borrow pits at the Spi^y Canyon site and the class of material, together with an available water power for a temporary hydro- electric installation, should make an estimate of 30 cents a cubic yard a sufficient one. This figure, however, may be a little low if it is found nt-cessary to quarry rock to incorporate in the hydraulic fill at the outer slopes of the dam. I estimate that not less than 16 per cent of the quantities of material in the dam (exclusive of the rock toes) will require to be of large boulders or rock, say about 75,000 cubic yards. For the cyclopean rock toes, the loose rock obtained in stripping the found- ations in the centre of the dam and the excavations from the tunnel may be utilized to advantage. To the estimate in Mr. Hendry's report, I should prefer, to be on the conservative side, to add the sum of $44,000 to item No. 5 for heavy cyclopean rock toes, and with the available information which you have already obtained, I believe the sum of $558,000 as. the cost of constructing the dam to be a reasonably approximate one, although the estimates may require revision upon fuller investigation and exploration work. From estimates which I have prepared, the following is a comparative estimate of the cost of different types of dams:— Concrete Dam $1 ,350,000.00 $8.00 per acre-foot. Rock Fill Dam (288,000 cu. yds.) . 810,000.00 4.75 " " " Hydraulic Fill Dam 558,000.00 3.25 " " " Even if the above estimate for an hydraulic-fill dam is slightly exceeded, its cost will be very economical and reasonable, and will compare most favourably with that obtained by the construction of other high dams, and the available water storage will have been obtained at a much lower cost than has been ob- tained by the building of other storage dams in British Columbia and on the Pacific coast. I recommend further explorations of the foundations, and believe it to be important to obtain a report from a competent geologist dealing with the strati- graphical features of the site and basin. The proposal to build a dam at this site appears to be an excellent one, and from the information already available would appear to present no special engineering difficulties. Yours faithfully, G. R. G. CONWAY. BOW SITES POWES AVD 8T0SAGE 161 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e COMMENT ON MR. CONWAY'S REPORT BY MR. HENDRY. In order that the effect of the increased cost of the Spray Canyon dam, as estimated by Mr. Conway, upon the cost of power from the several develop- ments, may be seen, the following has been prepared : — Estimated Cost of Dam. Roads, etc .5 25,000.00 Temporary power plant 30,000.00 Preliminary, foundations, etc 40,000.00 Sluice tunnel and control 117,000.00 Dam, core wall, spillway, etc 165,000.00 Clearing 38,000.00 Engineering, continge.iicies and interest 99,000.00 Rock toes (as per Mr. Conway's report} 44,000.00 Giving a total of $558,000.00 To the above should be added the charges due to engineering, contingencies and interest on 1844,000, which amoimt to, say $12,000, giving a grand total of $570,000 as the cost of creating storage at Spray lakes. The total estimated cost of creating storage on the Bow river sufficient to ensure a minimum flow of 1,500 c.f.s. would be as follows: — Estimated cost Spray Lake storage $570,000.00 " " Bow Lake " 105,000.00 " " Lake Minnewanka " 140,000.00 Total $815,000.00 On the basis of a minimum flow of 1,500 c.f.s. the total continuous output of the river would be 47,300 w.'i.p. '"herefore cost of storage per w.h.p. is $17 . 23, in place of $16.03 per w.h.p. as per estimate in the report. The cost of power from the several plants under this increase is set forth in the following table: — Plant. Bow Fort. Miflsion. Ghost. Radnor. Cost of plunt t 780,«0.00 Storage charges 155,070 00 Transmission, etc 86,400 00 Total capital cost $1,021,900.00 Annual charges t 117,518 00 Annual charges per h.-p 16 09 Annual charges per h.-p. on 50 per cent load factor i 32.18 I Annual charges per k.w. on SO per cent load i factor 1 42.91 I Annual charges per k.w. on 50 per cent load | factor under former estimate i 42 48 i $748,100.00 $782,966 00 $711,100.00 110,445.00 117,500 00 103,400 00 64,700.00 70,577.00 62,400 00 $923,245.00: $971,043.00 $876,900.(<) $106,173.00 20.03 40.06 I 53.41 j 52.96 I $111,670 00 18.92 ' 37.84 50.45 50.09 $100,843.00 19.39 38.78 51 71 51.33 From the above it will be seen that the in .reased estimated cost has very little effect upon the actual cost of producing power from the several plants. ! I 5 3E0RQE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« A. 1015 APPENDIX III PROPOSED DAM AT SPRAY LAKES BEPORT BT GEO. L. ALBERT. 163 6 GEORGE V. BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA0B SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se 1C5 A. 1915 PROPOSED DAM AT SPRAY LAKES (By Gi:o. L. Albert). „ „ ^ „ Banff, Alta., July 19, 1913. Mb. M. C. Hendry, B.A.Sc, Chief Engineer, Bow River Survey. Dear Sir,— According to the agreement made with you at Coquitlam dam, I beg to hand you herewith report upon the investigation made by me, during the past few days, into the feasibility of placing a hydraulic-fill dam in the canyon on Spray river below Spray lakes; also the suitability of the adjacent material to that form of construction. Canyon and Formation. The canyon is a deep, narrow gorge, formed in limestone, and evidently foliowmg the course of an old fault. I found that the bedding planes of the limestone on the west wall of canyon were lymg nearly horizontal, east and west, and with a slight dip, or strike, south; the canyon wall on this west side rismg to an elevation of about 160 feet above river-bed, and is very precipitous but not so nearly vertical as on the east side. On east wall the bedding planes have been turned up nearly vertical, running north and south with, or parallelbg, the river, and rising to an elevation of about 200 feet or more above the river-bed. Dam Sites. I first made a general examination of the canyon and selected three points for study and comparison, which I will distinguish by numbering as follows:— Site No. 1, or Lower, Site No. 2, or Middle, Site No. 3, or Upper. SiU No. 1 is at the narrowest part of gorge, 1,000 or 1,200 feet downstream from the beginning of the canyon, with the center line of the proposed dam falling across the river through the center of the cliSF. At this point it approxi- mated very nearly to the site pointed out by you as the one having been selected. This site would require lef^s material, likely, than either site No. 2 or site No. 3; but after a careful study md examination of the walls. I found that the west wall is shattered and seamy for some depth into the side of wall from top to bottom, necessitating expensive cleaning. The east wall is very clean on the face • but back m the wall from about 25 to 40 feet, the strata are badly seamed and parted, plainly showing the effects of the milling in the faulting; and the seams being partlv refilled with hydrated fragments, and very porous, would make a good seal doubtful without a great deal of special work. Both rock walls rise to a suPicient height to admit of a dam of the proposed elevation, which is. I under8tat.J, approximately 160 feet. . Site No. 2 is 160 or 200 feet upstream from site No. 1, with all conditions as at «t* No. 1 except that .i!! nf the shattered material on the west side, and all of the seamed and hydrated materials on the east side have been torn oflf, and worked and slid away; so that little or no work would be necemary to secure an absolutely safe seal to a good bonding surface. 18S DEPAJtTWmfT OF THE IXTERIOR III ■n ,,..,,,. » PEORGE v., A. 1915 I a^H^^" tIT ''^ '?'"Vy involved would be the same at both sites Nos 1 and 2. They are simple, as you know, and very natural. The clean Woffh- b. reduced ^me 16 or 20 feet. 0„ l^l't S'ihrdip of iWook itSl" J the .onth on the «e.t side the solid roek would not be high eSouSXr mill =iSf^!'3?rdSiTfrthT?i„T ■ ™ -s^r^" " - s-.i.^, '.* After careful consideration and comparison of the best Doints nlona thn, SEs:'- '""' "'"*''^ ^'^^ ^*^- 2 ^- re'commendation, the ferl"bei^g*i: at alf j::fc;'S:„J'?h'iTort^^^^^^^^ "" *'^ ^'^"^ "^^''^^^ -"'^^ ^« ^«^-l an™. ';»7^°"*"^?"'?« the profile along the centre line, across a deeo narrow gorge, as this gorge is, it would be the flatter at site No. 2,Twch is of coSr able value to the poise, or rest, of the hydraulic material foi the rewon that there is much less tendency of the material in the final drying out Ind shrink on*'thn S/'' ^''«^ *^e ^°"? ^'**» **»« «°»d formation at or SL? the top of "5" sHe No. f ^'■"*''' ^^""^ '^''' ''°"''^ *»« '^•*'> *h« »«"ly vert" ^wX « at diveSrw7^rbe7S rmf afSeril"! 5.^'''""'^^ ''"^ ^'^^'^^-^ ^^ "^ Material for Sluicinq. „i.„i^*'* "^""^ "mestone formation on both sides of the canyon is covered hv « ti vLlinf^""/.; P"""P'^ly of disintegrated limestone hydSicard^sited to varying depths, and over an extensive area. On the east side Sp« w«i o the bedrock rises to a much greater elevation than T the 'wit s'dl The depomtedmatenal 18 much thinner here, but ample and availabTe ^^^ „a«ii„ M ux ^j**^' ^¥ '^^Po*'* °f material is from 80 to 100 feet deen- ix menis oi an nydraulic-fill. It is composed of dis ntegrated limestone itn n^rnrl\ gravity corresponding to the limestone, which has a%ery hrvyTavity-?W «n^ P^/^fo"* it '» my opinion that a dam with slopes of 2 : 1 on back side Classification, location, and explanation of samoles of matprial. ♦«!,<.« „♦ vanous points i. the basin below the lakes and on d" wn to thT s L; "- *"'''" "* The samples were taken from excavations I made into the materials at many BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA0E 187 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e points; the samples being panned or washed in water in such a manner as to separate and grade the material, showing approximately the percentage of the fine and coarse material combine. Commencing at the lake on both sides, I made a very careful examination of all material from river level to the top of the hills, and on below sides, by making many test holes, and only taking samples where a marked difference in class would show. As generally taken, the material was sufficiently uniform to be judged, as a whole, as almost ideal material for the work proposed. As pre- viously stated herein, the deposits being much deeper on the west side than on the east side, and consequently being at a lower level on the west side, the percentages of clay and fine sand are greater than on the east side; more particularly so near bedrock, the coarser materials lying nearer the top. The great depth of the deposit and very convenient location suggests the west side for the choice of borrow pits. The percentages given below of the various samples do not show accurately the proportions as found in each small sample of about one-half cubic foot of the material washed; but gives very closely the proportions of the aggregate at the place of taking, considered as deposited in an hydraulic-fill. I have delivered to you two samples of the best clay and sand deposit, which I would suggest that you have tested. The sample of the pulverized material is from an exposed bank of clay on west side, and about 300 feet upstream from site No. 2. It is off the surface, and is principally clay and fine sand. The solid sample is from an excavation made in an old slide near the upper end of canyon on west side. I estimated that it contained about 15 per cent of moisture when first taken out, and about 60 per cent of clay and fine sand, and about 25 per cent of coarse sand and gravel. This material alone would give more puddle material than would be neces- sary; but estimating the whole deposit as taken in the construction, there is sufficient of all grades to make it especially good. The tests of all samples on west side, taken near bedrock, showed about as these samples: — Moisture .15 Clay and fine sand .60 Coarse sand and gravel .25 1.00 The samples taken at from 25 to 40 feet above bedrock were much coarser, and, not considering moisture, showed as follows: — Ci?y 30 Fine sand .10 Coarse sand .15 Gravel 25 West Side. Cobbles and boulders .20 1.00 The samples taken at and near the top of deposit showerl : — Clay 10 Fine sand .10 Coarse sand .20 Gravel 25 Cobbles and l)oulders .35 West Side, 1.00 i ,' *" DEPASTMEJiT OP THE lyTERIOB averaging about— "curocs was oi about the same uniformity, Clay Fine sand 20 Coarse sand Ix Gravel -20 Cobblestones....... ^f East Side. .25 1.00 or a&- '^^''' '* '"^« J"^* ^^^^ ^^^' showed very little clay and fine sand. Clay -. Fmesand "^ Coarse sand -^ Fine gravel -^^ Coarse gravel z^ Cobbles .'...'.'.'.'.'.'.'.■.■. "52 Conclusion. ?;° 'f ?">» No. 2 i. .b«>l„tely beyond quSon"'"'""'- Construction of road for transportation not excessive recommeTdr""'^ '* " ^''''''''''' ' ^^'-^'^^ -»>-«. -d I can very readily Awaiting your acknowledgments, I beg to remain, Yours faithfully, GEO. L. ALBERT, Supt. of Construction, Lake Coquitlam dam, also Canyon Creek dam. Lake Francis dam, Acatlan dam, Laguna dam, Los Reyes dp^m, and others. 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25a A. 1015 APPENDIX IV RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF SLUICING MATERIAL REPORT BT FRANK T. SHUTT, M. A., F. i. C, D. S.c, Dominion Chemist. te i ( 6 QEORQE V. BOW RITER POWER AND 8T0RA0B SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« 171 A. 1915 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF SLUICING MATERIALS. (Fbank T. Shutt, M. a., F. I. C, D. Sc, Dominion Chemist.) Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, August 21, 1913. J. T. Johnston, Esq.. tJydraulic Engineer, Water Power Branch; Department of the Interior, Ottawa, Ont. Re "Hydraulic Fill," Lahy. Nos. 16S64-6. Dear Sir, — The two samples of "fill" forwarded with your letter of recent date, have been submitted to mechanical analysis and the following results obtain 3d: Sample A. — A hard conglomerate of gravel, sand and clay, in large lumps. Readily di.jintegrates in water. Sample B. — Chiefly in small lumps and consisting of sand and clay with small stones. Analysis of Fills. I. Coarw gravel and stones 2 mm. sieve 2 to 200. . . , | 23-80 II. Finegravel 1 mm. sieve > 1 to 2 ; 4-71 III. Coarse sand -Smm. sieve -Stol .3-27 IV. Fine sand Rapid settlement 05 to -5... i 1907 V. Silt, with fine sand Slower sedimentation. OOS^o-OI.! 9-75 VI. Clay By difference 0004 and Bnerto 005 39-40 18-64 3-87 2-53 15-33 7-64 5228 Under separate ci ver we send specimens of the types mentioned in this table (with the exception of VI), as obtained from "A." These will probably enable you the better to comprehend the character of the various components into which we separated the material. Yours faithfully, FRANK T. SHUTT, Dominion Chemist. I! r ■Ik^ 4 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e A. 191S APPENDIX V THE GEOLOGY OF THE BOW RIVER BASIN CHAKLE8 CA.MSELL, B. Sc, Ph. D. 25e— 13 173 t i ! ! Mi 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« 1915 THE GEOLOGY OF THE BOW RIVER BASIN (By Charles Camsell, B.Sc, Ph. D.) INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT. The information contained in t'.iis portion of the report is compiled wholly hom reports of officers of the Geological Survey, and mainly from those of Dawson, McConneil, Cairnes, Powling, and Allan. Much of it is copied verbatim from the Guide Books prepared by J. A. Allan and D. B. Dowling for the Inter- national Geological Congress in 1913. The following reports deal more fully with the geology of certain portions of the Bow River basin: — Dawson, G. M.— Preliminary report on the Physical and Geological Features o/ that portion of the Rocky mountains between latitude 49° and 51° 30'. Geol. Sufv. of Can., vol. 1, part B, 1885. McConneil, R. G.— On *'.e Geological Structure of a ..ortion of the Rocky moun- tains, Geol. Surv. of Can., vol. 2, part D, 1886. Dowling, D. B.— Report on the Cascade Coal Ba-'in. Geol. Surv., Car.., No. 949. Cairnes, D. B.— Report on the Moose Mountain District, Geol. Surv., Can., No. 968, 1907. Allan, J. A.— Rocky ATountains— Guide Book No. 8. part 2, page 167. Dowling, D. B.— Winnipeg to Bankhead, Guide Book No. 8, part 1, page 77. General Physical Features. The basin of Bow river west of Calgary lies on the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountain system, between latitude 50° 30' and latitude 51° 45'. In this basin are three distinct types of topographic form, the western, including the rugged alpine region of the eastern ranges of thi Rocky Mountain system, the middle covering the more rolling foothills region, and the eastern the level plains region about Calgary. The Rocky mountains here, as elsewhere, are made up of a series of paralhl ranges striking about N. 30° W., and coinciding more or less closely with the general tiend of the main mountain system. Between the ranges are deep longitudinal valleys whose positions have been determined by the presence of belts of softer rocks. Crossing the ranges here and there at right angles are a number of transverse gaps through which the larger streams break on their way eastward to the plains. The pattern produced by this system of drainage IS that of a series of oblong, rectangular blocks, the longer directions of which are parallel to the trend of the mountain axis, while the shorter are at right angles to it. The origin of the longitudinal valleys is directly connected with the origin of the mountains themselves. The transverse valleys, however, may represent portions of very old drainage systems which existed previous to the elevation of the mountains, or they are due to erosion of the streams along lines of weak- ness or fracturing developed during the period of mountain building. Bow river is in some places longitudinal and in others transverse. For example, from Laggan down to Sawback it occupies a longitudi'"'' valley that 178 DMfABTMMSJ O' TBM INTERIOR 6 QEORQE v., A. 1915 has been cut out by the stream along the crest of a fold in the strata. From Sawback it turns eastward and as far as Bankhead occupies a transverse break across the strike of the bedrock and across the trend of the ranges. It then reaches a belt of soft rocks which deflects its course again southeastward down a longitudinal valley until below Canmore it again turns at right angles and breaks through the outer ranges into the foothills region. The loftiest summits of these ranges are those about the main divide, where several individual peaks are more than 11,000 feet above sea-level. A number of mountains exceed 10,000 feet and whole ranges and groups of peaks surpass 8,000 feet. The tjrpe of mountain most commonly developed in the Bow River baein is that with a steep escarpment on the east side and a longer ec^y slope on the west side. This feature, like that of the longitudinal valleys, can be attributed to elevation of the mountains by thrust from the west, the strata having been folded and overturned, or broker and overthrust on each other. Erosion then produces the steep ea&tern slope, while the easy western slope represents the original dip of the strata. V/here the i^ummits are composed of horiiiontal beds of massive limestones the easy breaking of the beds along joint planes at right angles to the beddii^ produces mountains of which the upper parts are sheer cliffs. A later stage in decay of these mountains results in chimney or spire-like Seaks. Where the limes. . jne beds have been turned completely on edge as in the awback range the massive character is replaced by straight narrow crests and saw-like outlines. The break between the mountains and the foothills is sharp and distinct and marked by the abrupt escarpment-like front of the Rocky mountains. The foothills region is characterized by a group of long ridges or hills arranged in linear series, the positions of which have been determined by zones of harder rocks. The trend of the ridges is the same as in the main ranges, and to a certain extent the same general drainage pattern holds. The summits of the ridges are generally rounded and flowing, except where crested with ledges of sandstone. While the distul-ba;nce of the bedrock in tie foothills is not less than that found in the mountains the more subdued topo- graphic outlines of the former are due to their being composed of much younger and softer rocks which are less resistant to the action of erosion and denudation. Topographically the foot-hills region merges gradually into prairie region on the east, the open rolling character of which is due primarily to the almost undisturbed attitude of its underlying bed rock. Stratigraphy. The rocks of the Bow River basin above C'llgary contain representatives of almost every age rom Pre-Cambrian to Recent, or from the oldest to the youngest. They are all stratified rocks and the sequence is exposed in des- cending order from east to west, the strata about the main divide being the oldest. The missing formations are those of the upper part of the Tertiary, the Silurian and the Ordoviciaii. The la. ' two mentioned, however, appear on the western slope of the Rocky mountains. The following table, mainly after Allan, presents the geological formations in summarized form with the approximate thicknesses and lithological char- acter of each : — 1915 BOW RIVER POWER AS • STORAOh SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se Table of Fokmationh. 177 ' item. Formation. .\ppr(i>. I ThicknvM. I.itlinlogy. Recent nnd Pleiitocene. Tertiary. Cretaceous. Jurassic . 1-' rmian Feet. Fluviatile Gravel, sanii. Lacustrine Gravel, sand, clay, flit and conglom- erate. Till. Glacial. (Kp>sion surface). Paskapoo 5, 700 Y<.'llnwi.sli sandstones and bluisli gray and olivr sundy shales. Edmonton 700 Lifdit col'iured. soft sand-stones, shales j'.nd clrtys. Pierre 1,000 Dark cr:.y or black sludcM (Itcur paw ! shalcsj; light colourtni sandstones, I shales and clays (Belly Riv<'r Ijcds); and dark shales (t_laKf|!ett shales). Niobrara 200 Sund.stones and shidcs (Cardiuni ). Benton 72.1 Dark Rray or black shales Dakota il.W Sandstones and conKlomiriites. Kootenay 3,700 Mastive and thin bener Banff lime- stone I, .500 Devonian Intermadiate lime- stone Sawback limestone (age?,' Contact relations nut known. Upper Cambrian Ottcrfail lu-nestone 1,725 Clmncelicr 4,500 Shcrbrookc 1,375 Paget 360 ;Bo8worth ': l.Sj5 Black to dark uray shale. ar|?ilhir( .ms and calcareous; wepthering lifiht brown. Thick-bidded gray limestones wit numerous dolomitie segrt-ga- >>ns. 1,800 Thin-bedded limestones with alter- nating mori. massive layers of gray doloniitie and silif'(-ouslim:'stone. 3,700 Thin-i)edded limestone inter-bedded with 1, .. resistJint layers and Ijrown- ish and yellowLsh shale. Massive blue limestones with eherty and shnly bands. Thinly laminated gray argillaecous and calcareous nietaargillites and shales; weathering re»t(.n.-. »n>l slmU- in- rlu» "()(pK.,p«w «halo" in Mt. I Stephen and "HurgeMi «hal.-" in Mt. ,,,.,, ! ' Field. ' '*«''"'™' 1 .585 Thin.hedde«'er Cambrian Mt Whvi» ron cT^ T"!^ 7' — — " '• " "'^'^ '*' '^'["■r™", ''•'«'•'■ sandstone and thin- <, p. oe,lr. *«' temimnouMciunrtjiticsnnd-ton.-. lo- cal basal i()n«loiiierutc and ciiariie- Conforiiiable in some places. Kraim-d sandstone. Pre-Canibiian Hed(led. Pre-Cambrian. The Fre-Canihrian rocks are (iistributed along the floor and si.les of R,m- Rivor valley from the l,a«e of Cantle mountain to tL heare-Caml.rian shales and ca Th ' L^ ''''""' •'"'*';♦'' '" " '■'''"''•" "f 'l»">-tz. feldspar rm , I """' '•"■'' r """■•' fr<'et a„d n nsisfs , f a ferruginous s.l.ce,.u,s shale. I, weathers n.ore rea.lilv than 11 .',";.,«•< aU)ve so that the sh>pes in it are more gradual. .«..^ . ' *'^*' •!'.''"" f""","''"" '•""•■*'"<'< of massive-hedded, ferrugiiu.us ouartiiitic sandstone, with a total measure.l thickn.«ss of 2,71)5 f -et T .w i Ts for n steep e.scarpme,.ts wherever they are expose.l. On the w.-J -i .- f „ n^' col'; r"'/ ';■ *''"v""'';'"""'' *•' ""•^" '»"«'* ''^'' "V't 2jm feet high. Th. h^ «, colour of the rock ,s due to smoky .,uart« and sn.all particles'.f ,„ ZZ I BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA0E 179 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e In sharp contrast with the underlying massive quartzites, there is a thin series of siliceous and calcareous shales grouped as the Mount Whyte formation. These shales are less resistant than the quartzite and form gradual sloi>e8. Some of the layers contain numerous annelid borings and trails. Middle Cambrian. The Middle Cambrian ct)nsists of massive limestones and some shaly lime- stone and calcareous shale. It forms the steep escarpment of the upper part of the Castle mountain and occurs again on the sunmiit of the main divide in the Bow range and the Waputik mountains. The Cathedral formation consists of massive and thin-beddetl dolomitic limestone, which on the weathered surface becomes buff and grey. The more massive beds are arenaceous in their conijwsition. The Monarch mine, in mount Stephen, and other small mineral prospects in the Kicking Horse valley, are in this formation. Some of the limestone has become metamorphosed into marble. One of the best exposures of this rock is in Cathedral mountain, 4 miles east of Field. The Stephen formation is only 640 feet thick, but it is important for the number and variety of fossils which it contains. It consists of shaly limestone and calcareous shale. These beds include the "Ogygopsis shale" in mount Stephen, and the "Burgess shale" in mount Field, on the opposite side of the valley. T >' former includes the widely known trilobite-bearing "fossil bed," while the latter includes the new "fossil bed" discovered bv Dr. C. D. W'alcott in 1910. The Eldon fonnation has a thickness of 2,728 feet in Castle mountain. It consists essentially of massive-bermaiion includes the highest beds exi)osed in the How range in the vicinity of Hector pass. The remaining Cambrian formations, the Orilovician, and the Silurian, are all exposed in the western portion of the Rocky mountains between the Bow range and Columbia valley, and are not present in the basin of Bow river. Devonian. The Devonian occurs in a numi>er of bands which trend in a direction parallel tu the axis of tlic niuuntaiii:^. One hand (To^c* the Bow Valley at the (Jap, and another at the western end of Lac des Arcs. A third band overlies the Cretaceous shales on the west sitle of Bow valley from Canmorc to Bank- head. Other ban« "T^ °^ ^^'^ Paskapoo formation overlap the Cretaceous at Cochrane and extend from there eastward to Calgary. They con- sist of yellowish sandstones and bluish grey and olive shales.^ They have not ^nZP'^t^^H^^'-"'^'^/'""^ ^^P' ^^'« 1*'^ ^^^"^ «»d still lie in almott hori- arhrgh "ngS' "" ^^ ^"^ "^"^^ '"'''' ^^''^ ^^^ ''^ 8^"^™' *'«*'» t"t^d Pleistocene. A thin veneer of unconsolidated material covers the surface of the solid rocks nearly everywhere except on the higher levels of the region. This uncon- solidated material includes river deposits of gravel and sand which aoDear as GlacTaTltk""* ''^H ^'f " 1 \**f '-«-^t-«">«. eV« which Ze'l Jd down Kst- Olacial lakes, and glacial debns such as moraines and boulder clay. Geological Structure. f Ko J**^'"'^ ^""^ [°"f different types of geological structure developed in the rocks of the Bow river basin The first is that of the almost flat lying rocks of the reSon oSini att'ilir t'lVf ?H-n^""^ ''""/^'^ f"^'^**^ disturbed from theTr original attitude. In the foot-hills pressure from tbe west has thrown the beds DaraltPfTth^ irregular major olds and minor ^rumples w.ich have their axis parallel to the general trend of the mountain In manv cases the beds are broken and faulted along lines parallel to '" lolus of „7 . I'^'^'^f ".'■^V?' °^ ^^^ ?•"'•'>' " -ntains are characterized by a series of great longitudinal fractures along which the strata have been broken Ulted and shoved one over the other towards the east. The result is a series of fault blocks having a steep face to the east and a more gentle slope to the west The western slope of these fault blocks represents the Ip of the beds InThe ranges about the head waters of Bow river the disturi,ance is not as great and the stmt -i are not as closely folded and are traversed by fewer faults. The Ss in conse- quence have lower dips and horizontal attitudes are not rare. Geological Hlstory. The Rocky Mountain region in the neighbourhood of Bow river was a region ,n which sediments were being laid down almost without Uiterruption from Pre-( am brian imes to the close of the Cretaceous. The e^i >n f"rn "d part of a great interior sea whose shore line fluctuated from time to t^ime but which was gradually pushed eastward towards the plains. By the clase of Cre- taceous times a great thickness of sediments hud been laid down the materials for whic 1 had been derived from a land area to the west. SedimentaS con- rn'^rentlr:^^^^^^^^^^^ \ BOW RIVKR POWER .WD STORAGE 183 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e the course of mountain building the strata were arched upward, compressed and overturned on each other, and up-f()lozoic age Devonian and Carboniferous — consisting mainly of limestones with soma quartzite and possibly shale. The strata have l)een tilted, and on the northeast side of (ioat range dip at angles of about 45° to the southwest. On the west side of the (Joat range tho dips average al.out 00° in the same directiim. The strike of the outcropping edges of the strata coincides roughly with the trend oi" the mountain axis, so that on th ' msverse portion of the valley at Sj)ray lakes the strike is directly acro.ss .: j valley, while in the main valley of Spray river below S()ray lakes the strike is parallel to the valley. At the point then where it is suggested the site of the dam should be .e strike of the rocks is in general parallel to the course o^ t' o stream, and the rocks themselves consist of limestone an.' (juartzite. At Spray falls a ledge of pale grey limestone rn.sses the river, making a drop of 40 f«H't. The remainder of the proposed stoiage basin is covered with uni'on- solidated glacial anil stream deposits which ri'st with a variab'e thickness on the upturned edges of the s'' Mk>. IM DBPARTMEST OF TBB INTBRIOB KANANASKIS FALLS. 5 QEORQE v., A- 1919 .+««J^t'""*^ ^^ falls are caused by outcropping ledges of Cretaceous sand ite^^T,? T *^® ^f^^ sandstone. The sindstone beds are Tom 50 to f ff fcV° ^^'""^T: *°^ "« overlain and underlain by shaleT^CaTrai describes the Cardium sandstone at this point as follows: "The lowest bed k^TvP^ S sandstone, weathering to a reddish colour and is fairly wd bSdId T^e bed ^nnM ""^ " '^.%''' ''^^^ °'^ * freshly-fractured surface, i sve^massive hard n? f hr°.'^"*y*''*''- ^^"* '« * conglomerate bed 1 foot thick^on top of each the coi^sStheltSe'am!"'' '^''*'^"^ '' "P^*'^^'" ^^°"* 20°, and strike across HORSESHOE FALLS. r«,.^?°'^^^°j /*"^*^ caused by an outcropping ledge of sandstone of the F ^W FORT. is ex^7ed*1n tTp h„nvi°T.l''^ -^ °l?"^ ^°'^ **»« Cardium sandstone formation AbX Bow Fort the^^^^^^^^ Aoove ijow tort the snales below the Cardium sandstone are broiwht nn tn the. afs'^TL^tVstf of 'Bentr*""^ ^ t ^^^ -brht1SsVb"lo;X'Hresh5: down rSly^^d^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -^ -ft. They weather BOW RIVER POWER AVD STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se 185 Section of the Cardium Sandstones measured near Old Bow Fort, ON THE Bow RIVER. DARK PIERRE-LIKE 5HALE5. UPPER SAMDSTONE BED. GREYISH AND 6RE.YI5M GREEN, FINE- ORAINEO SANOSTONES.WEATHERINS TO A . REDDISH COLOUR. THE INTERCALATED SHALES ? ARE NEARLY BLACK, SOMEWHAT CAL- CAREOUS THROUGHOUT 30' fi^ DARK PIERRE-LIKE SHALES WITH A FEW CALCAREOUS SANDSTONE BEDS 6 INCHES TO I FOOT WIDE NEAR THE TOP, WHICH ARE VERY REGULAR, PER- SISTENT ANO NOTICEABLE. MIDDLE SANDSTONE BED. THIS HAS I& INCHES OF CONGLOM- ERATE ON TOP. VERY HARD, QUARTZITIC, MASSIVE SANDSTONE BED. PRESENTS SOMEWHAT OF A SLUE APPEARANCE DARK PIERRE-LIKE SHALES. LOWER SANDSTONE BED WITH CONGLOMERATE 0^ TOP. WEATHERS TO A REODlSH COLOUR. CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF DARK SHALES INTERCAI.ATED. FINE-GRAINED. RATHER HARD.SRIYISH SANDSTONE. DARK PIERRE-UKE SHALES. CLAGGETT SHALES ^CARDIUM SANDSTONES BENTON SHALES I i> i 5 QEORQE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se A. 1915 APPENDIX VI WATER-POWER REGULATIONS UNDER THE DOMINION LANDS ACT, SEC. 36, S.S. 2. 187 ini BOW RTVER POWER AND STORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se WATER-POWER REGULATIONS UNDER THE DOMINION LANDS ACT, SEC. 36, S.S. 2, Regulations made by His Excellency the Governor General in Council in virtue of the provisions of subsection 2 of section 35 of the Diomin- ion Lands Act. 7-8 Edward VII, chapter 20. as amended '•^- Section 6 of Chapter 27, 4-5 George V, to govern the mode of granting water-power rights in the provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, and the Northwest Territories. Section 35. — Dominion Lands Act. — Water-power. 35. Lands which are necessary for the protection of any water supply or lands upon which there is any water-power, or which border upon or being close to a water-power will be required or useful for the development and working of such water-power, shaii not be open to entry for homestead, for purchased homestead, or pre-emption, or be sold or conveyed in fee by the Crown, but may only be leased under regulations made by the Governor in Council. 2. Subject to rights which exist "- 'nay be created under the Irrigation Act, the Governor in Council may make , ^.ulations : (a) for the diversion, taking or use of water for power purposes, and the gran+ing of the rights to divert, take and use water for such purposes, provided that it shall be a condition of the diversion or taking of water that it shall be returned to the channel through which it would have flowed if there had been no such diversion or taking, in such manner as not to lessen the volume of water in the said channel ; (6) for the construction on or through Dominion or other lands of sluices, races, dams oi other works necessary in connection with such diversion, taking or use of water; (c) for the transmission, distribution, sa. and use of power and energy generfited therefrom; (d) for the damming of and diversion of any stream, watercourse, lake or other body of water for the purpose of storing water to augment or increase the flow of water for power purposes during dry season; (e) for fixing the fees, charges, rents, royalties or dues to be paid for the use of water for power purposes, and the rates to he charged for power or energy derived therefrom. 3. Any person who under such regulations is authorized to divert, take or use water for power purposes, or to construct works in connection with the diversion, taking or use of water for such purposes, shall for the purpose.? of his undertaking have the powers conferred by the Railway Act upon railway companies, including those for the acquisition and taking of the requisite lands, so far as such powers are applicable to the undertaking and are nc* inconsistent with the provisions of this Act or the regulations thereunder, or with the authority given to such persons under such regulations — the provisions of the said Railway Act giving such powers being taken for the purposes of this section to refer to the undertaking of such person where in that Act they refer to the railway of the railway company concerned. 4. All maps, plans and books of reference showing lands other than Crown land necessary to be acquired by any such person for right of way or other purposes in connection with his undertaking shall be signed and certified correct by a duly qualified Dominion Land Diirvo,,-or. 5. Such maps, plans and books of reference shall be prepared in duplicate, and one copy thereof shall be filed in the office of the Minister at Ottawa, and the other shall be registered in the land titles office for the registration district within which the lands affected are situated. 25e— 1" I I •• DKPAHTMEyT OF THE lyTKRlOR 5 GEORGE v.. A. 1918 6. The Minister, or such officer as he designates, shall in case of dispute, be the sole and final judge as to the area of lar vhich may be taken by any person without the consent of the owner for purpose in connection with any water-power undertaking. Regulatior Governing the Granting of Water-power Rights in the Pro- vince* of Manitoba, Saslcatcb -wan and Alberta, and the Northwest Territories. {Establiahedby Orders in Council dated June 2, 1909; June 8, 1909; April 20 19W and January 24, 1911.) ' ' • . J ^^n^^f ^^^^^ regulations the word "works" shall be held to mean and include all sluices, races, dams, weirs, tunnels, pits, slides, flumes, machines hxed to the soil, buildings and other structures for taking, diverting and storinc water for power purposes, or for developing water-power and rendering thi same available for use. Mode of Application. =». 11 «i ^^!u^.u"PPl^''^"* for a license to take and use water for power purposes shall file with the Mimster of the Interior a statement in duplicate setting forth — \t{ -T-- name, address and occupation of the applicant. (b) Tne financial standing of the applicant so far as it relates to his abilitv to carry out the proposed works. ^ (c) The character of the proposed works. (d) The name, or if unnamed, a sufficient description of the river, lake or other source from which water is proposed to be taken or diverted (e ) The point of diversion. * '^K J^u ^"* J* °^ *^^ ^*" "^ '■*P>'i °^ »"ch river, lake or other source of water at high, medium and low stages, with corresponding discharges of water per second, reckoned approximately in cubic feet. (g) A reasonably accurate descrii-tion, and the area, of the lands required in connection with the proposed works, such lands, if in surveved terntorv to be descnbed by section, township and range, or river or other lot, as the case may be and a statement whether such lands are or are not Dominion lands. in) It such lands be not Dominion lands, then the applicant shall give the ihlrf r A '•fK»«t^'-«l. owner in fee, and of any registered mortgagee or lessee thereof, and of any claimant m actual possession other than a registered owner mortgagee or lessee. * owner, li) The minimum and maximum amount of water-power which the aonli- cant proposes to develop, and the maximum amount of water which he desires for such purpose. (j) Sketch plan showing approximate locations of the proposed works (k> Elevations of head water and tail water of the nearest existing works' It any, below and above the proposed works. ( I ; Particulars as to any w .ter to be taken, diverted or stored to the detri- ment of the operation of existing works, if any. (in) Particulars as to any irrigation ditches or reservoirs, or other works for .rngation wnthm tiie meaning of the Irrigation Ad, in use or in course of con- struction within the vicinity of the proposed works, and which might aflFect or he affecteJL 19? nUPARTUENT OF TBE INTERKB I 6 GEORGE v., A. 1916 .„„,/u^ For granting a lea.w to the applicant of such Dominion lands as may be allotU-d under paragraph (e) of this secion. and approved of by thi minister, such ease to be at a fixed rental for a term of twenty-one years running concurrently with the said licens -, and renewable in like mannerf and as nea? as may be subject to al the terms and conditions thereof. When there are no hv ?},? Miir.**' available for such purpose, or when other lands are considered dJfini «^K i •'' ^ ""T. ^""'i^^t f'"' ""'^^ purpose, then the Minister shall define such lands in regard to which the applicant may exercise the powers given under section 35, subsection 3, of the Domtmon Lands 4c<. tho ivi- V""°8 tjje construction of any works for the development of water-power ,k!ii K°' / **''' Interior or any engineer appointed by him for that purpose, shall have free access to all parts of such works for the purpose of inspectine same, and ascertaining if the construction thereof is in accordance with the plans and specifications approved of by the Minister, and whether the terms of the agreement, as provided for in the preceding section, are being fulfilled The License. n, ^f- ^P."" fulfilment by the applicant of all conditions of the said agreement the Minister of the Interior shall grant to the applicant a license as agrFedTpon and such license shall contain clauses to provide as follows:— t„^\!"'^ *f-'"™ °^ ^^^ l''^®"^^ *^*" ^« twenty-one years, renewable for three further consecutive terms of twenty-one years each, at a fixed fee payable annually and to be readjusted at the beginning of each term, as hereunder provided. (tfJ At the expiry of each term of twenty-one years the Governor in Council ma>', on the recommendation of the Minister, order and direct that the license and any le^ase granted m connection therewith be cancelled: Provided that th- so to'cancel *'^*" *** '*'"''* ""* ^^^""'^ ""*'*^* *° **^® licensee of intention (c) If the licensee shall refuse to pay the license fee as readjusted by the ( .overnor in Coumil, or as fix.'d by arbitrators chosen as provided in paragraph f.i, r"" A^*"",.'" ^"'^^' •■•'"'• ^^"^ Minist<>r may renew the license at the \SL ' 7 ♦h*^ ^'I'.vernor in Council may, on the recommendation of the thlr , wA 7 '■'"?■ '^'"''"* ^^""^ *^^ '"•^"*'« '»"d any lease issued in connection therewith l)e cancelled. (d ) In either of the alwvo cases lompensation shall be paid to the licensee as provided for in paragraph (e ) hereunder. "tense e A t 'xJ ^" ♦*'">'"«*>'"> of the third renewal of such license, except in case of default on the part of the hcensoe in observance of any of the conditions thereof or ot any lease granted in conneclion therewith, comp.!ted )>y tlif icense, and within a period to be fixed by the Minister, which -oii . J shall "not l,e less than two years after the licensee or person in charge of the . .: s mg w.)r!vs s' all have been noHfied of such order, and in default of compliant.- wliL ..■•h order the Governor in Council may direct that the license, together with any lease issued under these regulations shall be cancelled, and the works shall thereupon vest and become the property of the Crown without any compensation to the license?. (i) Upon a report being made by the Minister of the Interior to the Gov- ernor in Council that a greater amount of water-power could be developed advantageously to the public interests from the same stream or other source of water from which the existing works derive power, and (1st) that the exist- ing works could be enlarged or added to for such purpose, then th«! (iovernor in Council may authorize the Minister to offer the licensee the privilege of con- structing and operating such enlarged or additional works at or in the vicinity of the existing works, and to grant such supplementary licen.se as he may consider proper for such purpose, and if the licensee fail within six months thereafter to accept such offer, and in good faith to begin and carry on to completion .NUch enlarged or additional works, and to cdinplete same in accordance with plans and specificationa approved of by the Minister, and within a fixed period not to exceed five years, and upon like conditions as the existing works were begun and completed; or (2nd) if the Minister shall report to the Governor in Council that the existing works, owing to their location or construction, cannot ad- vantageously be enlarged or added to in order to develop further power sufficient to meet the probable demand, or would be a hindrance to other works con- templated for such purpose; or (3rd) that the existing works cannot, or will not, be any longer advantageously operated owing to the exercise of rights existing or created under The Irrigation Act; then in every such case, th(> Governor in Council may order and direct that the license, and any lease in connection therewith, and ail rights thereunder, shall be cancelled, and the existing works shall thereupon vest in and become the property of the Crown; Provided always that in every such case compensation shall be paid to the licensee as provided for in paragraph (e) of section 8 of these regulations, together with a bonus apportioned as follows: — (1) If the works have been in operation less than five years, a thirty p^-r cent bonus upon the value of the works. (2) If in oiHTation more than five, and less than ten years, a twenty-five per cent bonus. (3) If in operation more than ten, and less than fifteen years, a twenty per cent bonus. (4) If in operation mor.- than fifteen, and less than twenty years, a fifteen per cent bonus. (5) If in operation twenty years or more, a ten per c.»nt bonus. ( .i ) Thiit the liceus; shall not bo tr;in.sfcrablr wit hout the writton consent of the Minister, and that if the license fail to keep and observe all or any of the conditions of the licence, or any renewal thereof, or of any least- to Iw issued in connection therewith, then the license, together with such lease, shall in every 1M DEPARTUEXT OF THE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v.. A. 1915 Swn ^^^^^^ *° cancellation by the Exchequer Court on the application of the (k) That a schedule of rates and prices to be charged to the public for the use of power shall first be submitted by the licensee to the Board of RaHway Commissioners of Canada for adjustment and approval before being put into «lh Lw ?*K "V*^' °'" Pf'^es for power shall be legal or enforceable until such schedule has been so adjusted and approved nor if they shall exceed the amount fixed by .uch schedule; and that such schedule shall be readSd and approved by he Board every seven years during the term of the lease and license, and all renewals thereof. A^,J^^ /^** for the purpose of ascertaining the quantity of power actually developed, or capable of bemg developed, from the amount of water granted bv such license, the Minister or any engineer appointed by him for that purpose, shall have free access to all parts of the works, and to all books, plans or records in connection therewith bearmg on the quantity of power developed, and mav malce measurements, take observations and do such other things as he may con- sider necessary or expedient for such purpose, and the findings of the Minister or such engineer thereon, shall be conclusive and binding upon the licensee! ii^J'^A *u PfP^"" P^'ov'f on. as required by law, for the passage of logs and timber down the stream or other waterway affected by the works, a -^V/^' ***^ erection and maintenance by the licensee of a durable and rSS hir^ "' **"*" '«^^" "•■ "*^J''" ?^at?rway affected by the works when so required by the proper officer or authority in that behalf. .f * '?■ JJ"*r ^^^ "«^™«*"<' shall have no 'right to any water bevond the amount siatetl ill the license. (p) For the indemnifying of the Crown against all actions, claims or de- mands against It by reason of anything done by the licensee in the exercise or purported exercise, of the rights and privileges g.^^nted under the lease or license ♦^ ♦., The agreements and licenses to be issued her. under shall, subject alwavs I?«in„^ P'T'T ""-^^^^ regulations, be in such forn. and contain such pro- visions as the Minister may from time to time determine Storage of Water. 10. If at any time it is proposed by the applicant or the licensee to divert water from any lake or body of water for storage jiurposes, or to dam same in order to augment the flow of water in any stream from which water-power is to be developed, the applicant or licensee shall, in addition to other information required under these regulations, file plans as follows:— {a} A general plan in duplicate, on tracing linen, showing the location of such lake or other body of water, and the lands to he submerged or otherwise affected and contour lines showing the wa: r level at high an .. ilo 49-41 51 4< 63-7l Apr. 7 Apr 27 81-11 do It0-7x \Uy tt June 1 do 389-91 Kuasell 647-61 June 16 do 1793-01 July 1 July 14 July 27 do do C. Kitchie 1589-01 1058 0« 1360-Os Au«. 18 Sept. 5 Sept 21 798-71 do 774-2' do A. Newhall 336 -I* Oct, 17 128-9' Nov. 2 do 56-8* Nov. 20 do do 69-5'J Dec 4 121-7'" Dec 6 do 63-2" I>cc. 18 do 60-2* kDiHcharge mfawred at old xtiition 'DiM'hurgc iiieusufHfl at new i«tatiun. tCiauge not read owing to Imcknuit-r caii.(l hy iot- jhiii tWay bt- sliKhtly inHcrurate owin^ to ^^luah icv. •Arcurury alTcrted by great Hiiumnt of 'toifn slu^h ic<* causing iTowH-currt'ntM **Gau8ing made at an upi*n water MTtton ui-st uf LiiKuun. Probable error •^iiiuli. 1!M> soo DEPARTMENT OK THE INTERIOR n n, „ ^ GEORGE V., A. 1915 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow Ri.er at Laggan. Alta., for 1911. tak^^th-;°cS^J?SS'o:i.°''?.'T^"l2S:X?.*^!L^^^^^^^ After th.tth.ywer. PMwble to Mmpute daily diKh«j« Uter NoTMabSS! ^^ ""^ bMkw.t«r o. the gaug. and made it to! BOW RIVER POWFR AND 8T0RA0E 201 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26e Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow River at Laggan, Alta., for 1911. — Continued. July. August. September. October. November. Uav. Oauite Dis- Gauge HeigLt ciiarRe. HeiRht. DiS' Gauce Difl- char^e. Height, charge. Gauge Height Die- charge. auge ^ight Height. I charge. II. 12 13., 14.. II . 16 . 17 IS 19 . 20., 21 22 23 22 . 25, 26 27., 2R 29 , 3ft. 31 Feet. Sec.-tt. ' Feet. .«ec -ft. Feet. Sec.-tt 3'1« 3-18 317 3-Ot 3'M ' 3-09 303 3.00 292 2'8« 302 3-00 2.9< 2. 98 i 3-02 3.03 1 310 3-20 319 3. 11 3 09 3-08 ' 305 301 1S«7 1851 , IMS i<10 13A4 1349 1320 1276 1164 1124 283 1072 2. 80 1 1010 2.81 1022 282 103.5 282 1035 03 1320 o02 1305 1305 1276 1219 1248 13a5 1320 1425 1583 1567 1441 1410 1395 1349 129! 298 2-93 2-96 300 301 2 9r 2. 93 2-82 2-75 268 2. 63 ' 2-65 ' 2. 66 263 2-60 2-58 2-62 265 2-65 2-65 2-63 2-59 2-57 2-57 2-5« 2-57 2-47 2-45 2..'iO 2-5.1 2-55 1248 1178 1219 ,'.")1 S72 818 839 ' 839 818 786 688 736 736 6.56 6- 65 8-67 6-55 6. 38 , 625 6-08 599 5-90 5-90 5-94 601 6. II 6. 05 5-95 766 5'80 807 5-70 839 5.60 8;t9 a'50 839 5-50 i 818 5-48 776 5-40 7.VI 5-32 7.56 5-22 766 518 7.56 5- 14 661 508 1 643 504 i-OO 4-97 870 919 93(1 865 773 703 613 568 523 523 543 578 548 475 430 386 345 345 337 307 279 246 234 222 204 193 182 174 Feet. 495 4-92 4'9(l 4-87 4-85 4-S2 4"9 4-76 4-76 475 4'7S 4-75 4-75 4-75 4-73 466 4-66 4-67 4. 64 4-57 4-70 4 -.51* 4-, 54 ♦ 52 4-53 4-35 4 33 4'4I 4-28 4-4(1 4-42 See.-It. Feet. See.- ft 169 431 i 50.2 162 4-47 I 71-2 157 4-53 ; 81-4 150 I 4. 53 81-4 145 I 4-55 I 85 138 I 4-S« »«-S 132 ■ 4-53 M-4 125 4-37 57-4 125 4-30 49-0 123 123 123 123 '■ 123 119 105 — 105 107 101 88-6 113 90-4 83-2 79-6 81-4 55 52-6 62-4 46-6 61 63-8 Drainage area, 166 square miles. Monthly Discharge of Bow River at Laggan, Alta , for 1911. MosiB. January . , February* , March . April May.... June... July... AnguM. September October November (1-9), The period DlSCHARQI IN StCOND-FlIT. Rrx-oiT. Depth in Maiimum. Minimum. Mean. Per SQuare mile. inches on Drainage. area. Total in acre-feet. 216 49 97-1 0-585 0-67 5,970 90 47 57-8 0.348 0-36 3,210 89 46 .58-3 0-3.51 0-40 3,585 149 81-6 991 0-597 0-67 5,897 5211 125 317 1-91 2-20 19,492 2,063 617 1,403 8-45 943 83,484 1,.583 1.010 1,309 7.89 9-10 80,488 1,291 643 897 540 6-23 56,154 93U 174 485 2. 92 3-.i6 28,860 169 46. 6 108 0-651 0-75 «,«41 Mi-S 4» 71.0 n-43t 14 1,276 294,057 9M DKPAKTMEXT OF THE IXTERIOH SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Discharge Measurements of Bow River at Laggan, in 1912. IhLtt. Jn. Feb 23 9 Feb. I« Feb. 28 Mar 8 Mar 18 Mar. 28 Apri » Apri M May 9 May M Jt. 29 12 i ()et 4... Hydrocrapher. Width. V. A. Newhsll. do do do H. C. Ritehie... do do do do do do do do do do do do do JS A I H. R Cram ... 2^ " H.C.Ritchie... S<»'- • do Nov. 14 I do Nov.28 ...::' 3S ::: Feet. 10-00 1100 3«.«a IROO laoo isoo 1400 40-00 49-00 «l-00 66-00 S9-00 72-00 71-00 71-00 72-00 70-00 72-SO 69-00 S8-00 82-M 46-00 4«-M 4S-00 Area o(8ectiaa. Sq.ft. IS-W 14-90 60-87 36-60 28-80 22-80 2260 31-00 44-00 76-90 118-76 79-80 216-36 196-96 176-40 210-16 190-16 227-40 126-70 M-90 83-60 63-40 66-60 71-26 mmb ; Velocity. Gauie Hei«ht. Ft. per ten. Feet. 2-18 1-78 333 3-00 1-66 1-60 1-06 1-38 1-63 2-36 3-06 2-70 5-26 6-01 4-79 6-30 4-66 4-86 3-21 2-48 3-64 1-68 1-76 1-11 4-76 7-46 6-30 4-73 4-78 4-38 4-64 641 606 5-48 7-50 7-07 6-88 7-30 6-87 7-34 608 6-40 6-30 4-68 4-96 6-03 Difcharge. Bec.-tt. 33-43 2666 141.73 73-06 48-60 .17-60 40-60 39- M 71-93 178- gu 362-17 215-46 1.136-12 986-13 844-29 113-72 886-16 1.104-40 404-00 210-60 212-70 84-69 117-20 79-20 Da ily Gauge Height and Dis charge of Bow River at Laggan, for 1912. 1.452-20 1.458-40 1.601-00 1. 650-00 1,663-00 8 39 1.780-80 .f .M I.S.« an 8 15 1. 632-00 7-70 1.353-00 7-eo 1.291-00 (')Ice jamx rendere.1 (auce hei(htB uaelew Jan. I to 24. (i;Ioe conditiond Jan. 25 to April 6. BOW HIVER POWER AND STOhAOE gM SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Keioht and Discharge of Bow River at Lag^nn, for 1912 — Concluded. D«T. July. AuKUMt - Gaiice i Di*- Gaiiie Dii^ |Uei(ht. I charge. Heicbi charts Fest. i Sec. ft. I I 7-33 2 7-30^ 3 1 7-l» I 4 I 7-08 ' S i 7-M i 6 7-44 7 7-31 8 7-18 » I 7-lJ 10 i 71« 11 7» 12 1 7-15 13 7-33 14 ' 700 15 6-95 1« «-88 17 «.84 18 S.8« 19 6-99 20 70« 21 , 714 22 1 7-18 23 ' 7-lS 24 1 7-44 2S ! 7-38 2« 7-25 27 709 2t «-94 29 i 893 30 704 31 j 719 I 11238 iiosn 1038-8 9«8'8 9«g'« 1191-8 111-2 1030-6 1012-0 ' 1018-2 1043-0 j 1012-0 I 1123-6 I 919-0 ! 888-0 844-A 819-8 832-2 912-8 9M-2 1005-8 1018-2 10120 1191-8 1142-2 1074-0 974-8 881-8 I 875-6 ; 943-8 1036-8 Feet. Sec.-(t. 7-27 i 1086-4 7-35 1136-n 7-35 { 1136-0 7-57 ; 1272-4 7-65 13220 September. Gauge Dis- <.)ctober. Noveniljer. December. Gauge I Die- j pi Height charge. Height j charge. Hei [laiige leight. I Dia- . Gauge , I charge. Height : charge. 7. 31 \ 7. 13 7. 10 7-35 7-31 7-25 7-03 6-f5 ■ 6-78 6 84 7-24 I 7-48 ' 7-26 7-24 7-24 7-30 7-48 7-65 8-44 8-56 8-09 7-74 7 .56 7-2>. 6-97 1III-2 981 -i) 1136-0 nil 2 1074 937-6 826-0 7826 819-8 , l(«7-8 1216-6 1080-2 1067-8 1067-8 iias-0 1216-6 1322-0 18II-8 1886-2 1594-8 1377-8 1266-2 1092-6 900-4 764-0 Feet. .>»ec -ft Feet, j Sec.-ft 6.59 6. 49 A 44 6..W 6-25 6-15 6-10 60» 6-110 5-98 5-98 6-08 6. 09 6-02 5-94 5-89 ! 5-87 5-8S 5-78 5-69 j 5-63 ' 5.58 5-57 ' 5-51 i 5-54 ' i 5-46 ' 5 44 1 5-40 i 5-30 5-31 665-8 1 606 4 1 576 8 500-" ' 475-8 4312 1 411-2 ' 407-6 1 375-2 i 368-4 : 368-4 403-8 407-8 382-2 354-9 .338 6 332 2 325-8 304-2 278-n 261-4 248-11 245-4 5-31 S-28 I S-37 ' 5-:i7 j 5-34 5-29 5-25 j 5-26 ; 5-18 ' 5- 16 5- 14 5-06 5 06 5-06 5-04 5-11 5-28 5-21 5-16 , 5-12 I 509 I 5-(«) ! 4-97 230-2 i 499 237-8 1 4-96 218-2 ■ 4-95 213-4 4 95 204-2 4-90 182- S 4-76 184-8 4-69 4-70 184-8 178-6 197-6 107-6 191-2 180-7 172-5 172-5 158 6 154 7 1.50-8 135-8 1.35- S 135-8 132 2 145-2 178-6 164-5 154-7 147-0 141-4 125-0 120-2 123-8 118-5 116-8 IIA-8 108-2 86-0 76-2 77-5 Feet. Sec.-ft. ] Feet. 4-75 4-81 4. 86 4-89 4-94 4-94 4-95 4-98 4-98 9-12 501 4-99 4-96 495 4. 74 4. 90 4. 96 4-90 4-75 4-72 4-74 4-74 4-79 I 4-74 4-76 4-53 4-76 5-n3 5 33 5-59 84-5 93-6 I 101-6 ln«-6 1150 \ 115-0 lie 8 121 5 121-5 147-0 126-8 123. 8 1185 1168 . 102 107 960 780 75-0 73-0 70-0 68-0 670 61-0 i 62-0 68-0 79-0 78-0 no 5 do Dee. 1» do FMt. S8-S J7-5 14 2 M-1 7t» MO >1'3 Sq.-ft. Ft. per i 3-71 1-74 hSZ. |Di«h»rge. Feet. 8ee.-ft. 4'«S 1 2<8t 4'M 1 1U8 4 24 R7'2 4- It it* 43*8 Dailt Gauge Height and Discharge of Pipestone River, near Laggan, Alta , for 1911 1., 2 3.. 4.. 5 . a.. 7.. 8.. ».. 10.. U.. 12.. 13.. 14.. 13 . 18 17. 18 IS . 20. 21.. 22 . 23 24.. 25 2«.. 27 . 2» . 30.. 31.. DAT. September. Ootober. Gaofe Heicht. Die- ehuie. Gwin Dia- Height. charge. Feet. 8ee.-(t. ! Feet. 912 5' IS 517 508 4*5 480 4-80 4-75 4-70 4-70 4-72 4'80 420 4-7( 4 7,^ 4 «8 485 i-m 4-98 4-55 4-55 4-52 4-52 4-40 4-40 445 4-47 4-42 4-42 4-41 ! 318 324 330 304 288 254 227 214 201 201 30« 227 254 217 214 IM 188 175 185 182 182 154 154 123 123 138 128 128 128 128 4-40 4-40 4-40 4-39 ' 4-38 4-37 4-38 4-35 4-35 4 34 4-33 4-33 4-33 4-33 4-33 4-30 433 4-33 4-27 4' 1.4 410 4-10 426 4-15 4-00 3-98 4-05 4-no 398 4-10 Sec.-tt. 123 123 123 121 118 lis 113 111 111 109 108 106 106 lfl« 108 99 106 108 92-4 69 no 60 !«) 2 69 46 43- 6 52 46 4.'i>6 60 43-8 o, th^s^-m^Js^-ffoi'-sii^'M sssj^iss-o^d^fffliS^r/iJirhe"^?!^^^^ "- *»"- BOW RIVER POWER AXD STORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« Monthly Discharge of Pipestone River near Laggan, Alta , ^or 1911. (Uraiugf am. 122 iqiure niilw 9« DlflcHIKOE IN SwtJKD-FBW. Rvs-crr. Month. j D«pth in Maumum. Minimum. Mron. P" "fuare in^heaon Total aim. Drainafo acrp-fcet. September 3.10 123 200 1.639 t)ctober 123 43< SS-S 0-739 'i lie perifNl _ ^ 1 83 0.8a 11,901 8.522 17,423 DisiirvRGE Measurements of Pipestone River, near Laggan, in 1912. Date. Hytirotrapher. Width. Area of Kection. Mean Velocity. Gauge Height. Diacharge. Jan. 23 V. Feb. 5 Fel). 15 Fab. 28 Mar. 8 H Mar. 19 Mar. 29 .\pril 10 April 24 May in 1 May 22 June .'> June 19 July 4 1 July 18 1 \ug. I -Aug. 13 i .Vug. 29 ; Sept. 12.. I I let. 4 'H Oct. 17 jH \ov 1 \"v. 14 i Nov. 28 1 I)- charce. Gwice Heicht Dii- chame. FMt. 8M.-(t. : Feet. » 1 4. < «., 7.. S. I.. to . II . li.. 13.. 14.. It . U 17 . 18 . I*.. 10 . II. . » » M . M . M . « n . » 11 (I-) 4d 4'M 4'W 4M 4'W 4KI 4» 417 »'4 900 no 104 3I'4 no 1>« Ml 417 4'W 4 17 4 17 4-10 4' 18 4'IS 412 4111 4' 10 4'lt 410 4-10 4'21 418 4'«R 4'IW 4-80 4-70 418 410 480 400 4'U 418 4' 19 4' 10 410 408 (I) NoraeordeJui. 1 taU. w M'8 340 34'1 ,14. !i'0 34 4 390 390 390 390 390 340 340 33'« 14 8 14 « K'O 10 210 I8'« 100 HA «l'0 180 19' 8 14-0 110 14-0 12 8 March. Gaiwe I Dia- Heifht.' charte. Feet. 8ec.-(t. April. ■e Dia- Game Heiiht May. Feet. 8ec.-(t. 4 0« 4'Oi 412 408 4'0« 4' 14 3'41 4'89 4'80 4'«» 4'89 4'89 4'W 9'2« 9'93 9'93 9'98 9' 18 5' 14 9' 10 900 910 904 9' 19 924 DU- { Gaiwe i DU charpe. Height ' charge. Feet. See.-(t. ; Feet. Sec.-ft, 320 I 30'2 i 38-4 ! 320 , 390 ' 40-8 I H«'2 I 1900 , 188' i 182 ' 1900 212 2M'0 3880 9480 9480 441 S3''n 3880 3940 2840 3300 374 '(I 9'43 4840 994 9990 934 42*0 , 909 3040 900 2880 4-88 mo 4'79 1800 4'M) 1880 4-70 1880 4'70 1890 4'80 1380 4-88 1930 4'aH 2800 938 4410 9'91 8390 8'47 9080 9-80 9'9K 9-94 9280 9830 9990 9'80 928 9'88 7880 9-87 8480 9'70 8880 9'71 875 97» 7390 9'7» 7350 1 989 7sno ' 578 727 i 9'*9 MKin I 9'»l 8280 9'88 7880 800 8000 8 to 9800 9 79 7090 9 48 9090 9'43 4770 ROW RIVER POWER AND STORAUK va SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Pipestone River near Lagean for \n2.— Concluded. D«T. I 2 i 4 i R 7 8 10 II. 12 13. 14 M IS IT. II 1« 20 21 2t 21 24 2S. 2« 27 28 29 90 11. July. Oaiuce Din- Heicht . \ chame. Auicust. September. October. November. December. Fe>t. 530 iti i1\ ! i-M I S'M ! hit »-4« t-S8 I S'40 t'34 j 8.12 j 5'2S ji-2r i t'M S'll >'U f.M t.«l t4t «'28 «'2il 510 8ee.-[t. 407 43S 413 379 407 675 590 909 555 555 542 502 583 4«5 429 418 379 379 390 429 413 435 435 «32 535 441 39« Gww Heixkt Dia- GauRe charge Heiihl Difl- Gauge charge Height Die- ! Gauge , Di»- ' Gauge , Din- charge Height charge Height charge. 407 434 5-35 523 5-23 5.3« 5'30 5.3« 5. 13 50* 505 507 5-39 5- 59 5'4lt 554 5-58 581 559 5-84 8 17 8' 15 5 77 5-80 5-53 545 5-34 5M 453 471 447 528 576 435 389 389 441 407 385 321 292 288 298 459 590 515 555 383 804 5M) 835 1.018 1.020 720 597 498 429 185 5-22 5' 14 5' 13 509 5- 14 504 5 (10 5-02 4'9« 4 M 4-97 I 504 501 501 4-87 4. 84 4-83 4. 83 478 4-71 4. 64 4 72 4. 71 4-83 4.89 4-84 4-84 4'8t 4-59 4. 59 I Keet. Hec-ft. Feet. : .Sec.-ft. i FMt. 1 8«.-ft. | Fert. ! 8ee.-lt. ' Feet. 538 453 5-22 .164 542 471 514 328 5-37 447 513 321 5-50 528 509 .W 5-57 284 26K 276 va 244 256 284 272 272 219 4.64 j 4. 60 ! 4.55 I 4.55 I 4. 61 4-60 ! 4-57 4. .58 4 55 455 4. SO 4. 41 4-48 4-48 4-48 147 I 1.16 ; 123 123 139 ' 136 12>' 131 123 123 no 89 105 I 105 ! 106 I 209 452 115 206 4 57 128 2116 4.54 120 190 4 .10 iin 168 448 105 147 4 41 89 171 4 40 87 168 4.18 83 144 444 96 162 441 89 147 4 41 89 147 4-20 49 139 4 14 41 133 4 10 36 113 40* 32 406 32 4. 26 4-31 ! 4. 46 i 4.5s I 4-58 4'.56 I 4-56 : 4 .W 4'.VI 4. 66 I 4-86 ; 4-65 4. 61 4-58 4-35 5-21 4-72 4 85 4 M ^ 4-63 4-66 4-65 474 1 4 75 5.33 5-72 6-05 • '21 617 6' 15 59 64 92 j 108 i 110 I 44 ' 40 46 i ** I 168 292 I 440 : 520 478 I 440 6 14 611 601 5.91 5-80 8ee.-rt. 410 380 310 2«2 210 102 585 212 98 584 197 98 568 140 94 560 108 IU« 553 88 102 ; 5. 35 98 5-46 82 5-55 76 5-48 33 530 227 530 80 5-30 100 5. 14 .58 5 12 46 504 4-98 I 5-05 5-06 5-00 I 4-89 i 4-96 4'91 I 4.87 I 4-86 I 4.8* I 4. 86 48 58 64 36 28 28 25 24 M 26 24 a 24 23 21 21 21 23 Nam:— Thaagiiif coaditioM, Nov I 10 Dec 14. Ice coMltioM, Deo. 15 t4i 31 . Monthly Hi chakgg of Pipestone River near LaRgan, for 1912. I Drainage area, 122 atiuare milea I I Diain«ao« in ^••(tlNl>-F■•T. Ht!«4>r». Month. January 124-311 Kebmary . Maivh AarU May June July Augwit .**eptemlier (letnher November I)e«.e»ilier The iieriiNl Maximum I Minimum 2.'iK- 15| 34 6 ISO 180 mi* 5550 9800 67511 l.OM 364 n 1470 5X1 II 41(111 384 126 70 too 30 2 1360 (7*0 38».0 133 32 n 32 22 U Depth Per in iaehea Total Mmn lar « w Dminage Area. Aere-tairt. 31 " J5 0(17 483 263 23 (124 1.513 139 n II (1 13 855 no IK (1 21 I.38* 214 7 2 17 250 16.276 1*7.« 4-57 5 10 .13.179 468 1 J 84 443 28.782 510 7 4 18 4 82 31.401 2148 114 2 (15 13.1*4 lOI 8 (1 83 (1 96 6.198 115 M« I M • .§■>«. M 2 7)18 Oil 5.915 tt» uT.m 208 DEPARTMEyT OF THE INTERIOR 6 QEORGE v., A. 1915 DiBCBABOE Measubements of Fortymile Creek, near Banff, in 1912. Date. Hydrograpfaer. Omwb H«(bt. I DiaehBrge Joly 31 Aug. It Ai«. 31 Sept. 14 Oct. 1 Oet. 15 Silt. 30 Not. 12 Nov. M Dee. 10 Dee. » Feet. Sq. ft. Ft. H. C. Ritchie do do do H. R. Cram.. do H. C. Ritohie do do do do I 32 74-2 ' 1 3« 32 M'7 l'«5 32 HI 1 1 M 32'S 7t-4 ! Itl 2St 670 1 IM » U-t 1» » 1 41-7 0>7 27-6 4«0 ! 110 1S« 481 OM 28S 5)8 042 tit «•» i OK Feet. 3-90 4'M 430 3M 3'« 3-2t 2*2 304 i» 3-30 2'U Sae.-ft. lOOH 188-6 lU'O 123-0 78-t M-2 40-6 SS-2 l«-6 22-8 42-8 Daily Gauqb Height and Discbabox of Fortymile Creek, near Banff, for 1912. DAT. l\ >• -* i.. t.. 3.. 4.. I. (.. 7.. 8.. • .. 10.. II 12. 13. 14. ««.. It it. 18. 1* 20 21 22.. 23.. M 18 M 27 28 » 30 . 31 Auguet. September. October. I GMwe I Die- | Oaamt I Die- i Oeun Die- ! Height, ehuge. I Hei^t. Nuvember. December. Oaiue I Die- Gauge : Di*- Height. charge Height charge. Feet. ; Sae.-ft. j Feet. ' See.-ft. ! Feet. See-It. ! Feet. Sec.-ft. Feet. Sec.-ft. 3-n 110 410 147 3-43 80 3-12 59 2-75 17-50 3-95 122 4-17 144 3-42 79 3-12 69 2-97 21-0 3-W 118 4- 12 138 340 78 3 10 98 310 24-0 3-80 118 4-06 133 3 43 80 3-08 67 309 21-0 3-W 118 4 W 128 340 78 308 57 3-02 195 3-86 HI 3-87 124 3-37 78 308 68 298 18-0 3-83 no 3-06 122 3-36 74 3-T8 68 2-93 18-5 380 108 395 122 3 36 74 308 68 2-90 19-0 370 100 393 120 335 74 3-08 58 290 19-5 3-70 100 3- 1-85 3,517 1 tt 1,150 1-8 3,3811 15 l,n.M 1-75 3.243 15 1,055 1-75 2.855 15 1.055 1-8 2,732 1-5 1,055 1-85 2.498 1-55 1.102 1-9 2,385 16 1, .50 185 2.610 1 65 i,ai3 1-8 2,497 1-75 1.312 1-8 2,385 1-8 1,370 1-7 2,283 1-8 1,370 1-7 2.08.f 1-8? 1.4.33 1-6 1.900 1-75 1,313 16 1,727 1-7 1,255 1 55 1.645 1-6 1,150 1 35 1,615 1-6 1,150 1 45 l..5on 1-6 1.150 1 45 1.415 1-8 1,150 1 « 1.370 1-4 Feet. Sec.-(t. Feet. Sec.-ft. : Feet. Sec.-ft. ! • 1,055 1-3 905 ' 082 496 1,055 1-3 905 1,055 1-3 905 ! 1,015 125 872 075 475 975 1-2 ^ 840 I 975 1-2 840 ; 0-79 487 1,150 12 I 840 0'77 481 !,102 12 840 I 0-8 490 1,150 1-2 840 079 487 1,500 t'2 840 : 0-88 454 1.500 1'2 840 ' 0-6 430 1,433 M 780 ; 0-73 4«9 1,370 115 810 I 0'75 475 1,313 0-8 630 ' 070 460 1,312 105 753 084 442 1.370 0-9 675 0-67 451 1,435 t 0-71 4«3 1,500 0-66 448 1,435 ] 0-84 442 1,370 1 ' Oft) 430 1.370 1 1 0.86 448 1,255 ! 0-50 404 1,255 0-57 421 1,150 M 4.M 1,150 ! 0-85 445 1,103 0-65 445 910 0-64 442 1,015 0-60 430 1,015 fl-.W 427 1.015 061 439 i 975 0-44 392 •Ice conditions during all the month of December. tXo gauge height observations from Nov. 17 to Dec. I. Monthly Dischargf, of Bow River at Banff, for 1910. (Drainage area. 845 square mile?*). 1)1 .H( H.\HGE IN SnoND-Ktit. 1 Rl'S -Orr. Month. Maximum Minimum. Mean. Per square mile. Depth in inches on Drainage I area. Total in acre-feet. April 26J0 fy June July August ■ . . . 2.420 5,94(1 S. 120 n 2.W 4.205 2.095 I.!«13 3.4eeember. 28 da.va TlwiiMtotl 1.573 L.vm , 905 496 74,806 74,010 >«,0I4 25,047 1,. 191, 642 214 DEPABTMENT OF THE lyTERlOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Discharge Measurements of Bow River a. Banff, Alta., in 1911. Data. Hydrosraphnr. '"r a I H. R. Cancaltai.. Feb. IS do M"- 8 do Mar. 24 do Apf « H. C. Ritchie.. . . AP' M do May 10 do May 31 ! B. Roarwll Juae 15 do Jnae 39 do Inly 13. July M. Aim. 17 Aac. 31. Sept. 18.. Oct. 18. Nov. 4 Nov. 24 , Dec. 21. do H. C. Ritchie.. H. Brown do do V. A. Newhall.. do do do Width. Feet. SO 31 S2 82'S Itl'S 240 284'S 3)0 322 320 319 30S 297 Area of Meaa Section. Velocity. Gauce H^t. I DiacharKe. Sq.ft. I Ft. pen 1S1'« 140'« 151-4 1725 148-8 S8»-« 739-S 9t7-8 1709 ISM 1305 1376 1092 1042 2-58 2- 17 2'2« 1 97 1-89 101 I'Sl 1-93 4-62 4-03 301 3-23 2-25 1-98 Feet. 0-84 0-71 0-06 0-16 •0-04 063 1-24 190 435 3-90 2-98 3-30 2-49 2-2« • Negative (auKo height. i Ice condition,. t Partly fitncn over. Sec.-ft. 390-6( 305- Si 341-41 340-2t 28l-3t 392-7 1.114 1.832 7.908 6,309 3,928 4,465 2,456 2066 279 872-1 1 56 1-73 1.363 199-5 655-8 1-03 109 373-8 130-5 556-3 1 0-99 0-85 353-0 114 473-7 ! l-OO 76 474 -Ot S4-5 173-0 1-89 0-41 327-4t Daily Gauge Heights and Discharge of Bow River at Banff, Alta., for 1911. Dat. January'. Febniaiy. March. April. May June. 1 2 3. 4 5 6 7. 8 . 9. 10 II. 12. 13 . 14.. 15.. 16 17 . 18 . 19.. 20 21 . 32 23 M 25 . 2«.. 27. 39 3U HeiJISt ch^S. H-IS!? i K°* ^^^ P"- ''•"Pi °* ! Gaum I Di»- I Gau«e > Di* .2!!?^.!2?;^5!!?r:f5![!L!!!!!E^f5!I?!: "•*■' e'>»f«e Heiiht charge. Heiitht charge. Feet. Sec.-(t. Feet, i Sec.-ft. 0-23 0-23 0-44 0-47 0-34 0-58 0-59 0-55 0-29 0-41 0-41* 0-60 0-39 0-65 0-70 ' 0-72 0-76 0-7S n-82 0-90 n-s« 0'S4 n.N2 0-S2 0-74 0-76 n-»5 0-93 (I 95 II 92 0-a ' 280 260 345 i 345 375 373 375 330 210 240 ?63 .100 28(1 293 300 312 336 .348 374 430 416 388 374 374 I 324 ■m 451 4M 0-76 i 0-81 0-88 ' 0-92 1-04 ! 0-92 0-91 I 0-89 0-91 0-91 0-89 i 0-87 I 0-73 ' 0-71 0-67 0-71 : 71 0-59 W-58 0-37 0-49 0-49 0-«) 0-52 0-62 tfl-55 ' 0-47 0-41 416 336 537 437 423 437 437 423 4119 318 306 283 306 306 231 247 243 211 211 31.; 2Z< 263 2U 2ia 210 Feet. Sec.-ft. Feet, i Sec.-ft. 0-40 0-44 0-41 0-20 to- 16 0-11 010 0-04 II 04 03 •002 f<)02 •0-03 003 •002 •0 01 •0 01 •0 01 , t<)06 013 0-16 0-13 II- 1« 013 0-06 to-o« 006 0-03 [ 0-iR> : 012 0-09 240 270 283 3i5 263 280 300 307 307 301 289 289 286 m* 289 292 292 292 313 :m 344 334 .344 334 313 313 313 310 : 3ZJ 331 333 ; 008 fO-01 , •008 •Oil ' •0 04 ■ 0-04 •001 •n 112 tfl-OO 0-01 •0-01 •0 0.5 •II 1)5 •O-IH •0-04 ♦tlflO 004 O-rtt 07 013 O-.W 0-30 11.10 42 0-60 65 064 0-64 0-r,2 64 I 313 292 274 268 283 307 292 289 293 298 292 280 280 283 i 283 I 295 ' 307 .104 .116 334 i 400 400 4 1 144, 1,310 1-7S I 1,631 Feet. Sec.-ft. 2-35 3-10 3-30 3-SO 3' 13 3-00 2-90 2-90 2-90 2-95 3-33 3 98 4 -.15 4-70 440 4-35 4 30 4-32 4-15 4-00 3-98 4-38 4-61) 4- 40 4 .5.1 398 3-98 4 -III) 4-INl 3-93 2.393 4,210 3,200 5,20(1 4,330 3,970 3,733 3.733 3.733 3.. 830 4,815 6,572 7,900 9.310 8.093 7.900 7. 7111 7. 786 7, 1,M 6,640 6,572 8.017 8,9011 8.093 8,613 6,572 6,. 572 6.H4II n.Mll 6,470 t.Vo olMervation,, gauge height interpol.tee€*ember. The year .. 465 •m: 344 39(1 1.631 9.310 6.252 3,315 2,289 885 518 4«0 Minimum. Moan. Per square mile. Depth in inches on Drainage area. Total in acre-feet. 210 203 240 268 347 327 302 .367 ».4ai 0.3.S2 0.3.K 0-42S 047 (1-40 041 0-4» 21.336 18.161 18, .569 21,838 669 2.595 3,290 1,871 1.240 6.251 4.438 2,565 1-45 7-30 5- IS 2-99 1 07 8' 14 9-97 3 45 76.240 371.960 272.878 157,715 W15 4.10 270 325 1.5m 680 415 380 1 ;,j M 794 0484 U.443 092 0-54 51 24-91 » 9,070 5,07i) 4,890 3.0iO 9. 192 9,100 4,140 3,860 are uken from a rod I -0( lower than that uaed during 1911. BOW RIVER POWER .4.VD STORAGE 217 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Dischaug . of Bow River, near Banff, for 1912. — Concluded. July. Day. AufUft. September. Ootober. November. Di»- Gauge Di^ Gauge Di». Gauge Height Di«- Gauge ! Dia- Gauge Dia- Heiibt. charxc. Height. charte. Height charge. charge. Height. 1 charge, i Height ehsrge. 1 Feet. Sec.-ft. Feet. 8ec.-(t. Feet. Sec.-ft. Feet. Sec.-lt. Feet. Sec.-lt.: Feet. See.-lt I 2M 3,4SO 3.282 2 M 2 97 3,21u 3,902 3'66 296 2.792 2.990 1 64 163 1,228 1,216 103 103 648 848 065 064 435 2 2-88 433 3 i» 3.478 290 3,330 249 2,452 180 1,180 110 700 0-77 4*2 4 2-79 3.078 2-97 3,902 2 45 2.380 1-73 1,338 104 6.94 0-73 468 9 2-81 3.122 2-97 3.903 2-40 2.290 166 1,252 106 668 065 435 6 313 3.944 301 3,608 2 34 2,184 1 81 1.192 108 684 ' 064 432 7 324 4,2S2 2-72 2.924 2.27 2.072 1-99 1,188 106 668 1 065 435 8 3-30 4.420 4.232 287 2-73 2,814 2,946 2-28 2-25 5.088 2,040 1-59 1-97 1,188 1,144 104 107 6M 676 0-70 0-74 450 9 3-24 474 10 : 3-21 4.188 2-78 3.0S6 2-23 2,008 1 54 1,110 108 684 0-52 39« 11 317 4.098 2-73 2,946 221 1,976 t 51 1,080 104 654 034 315 12 312 3.918 2-67 2.814 2-22 1,992 1-48 1,030 103 848 051 393 13 3-28 3,308 2M 2,930 2-29 2,040 1-44 1010 102 642 0-57 411 14 1 3-28 4,280 2-48 2,434 2-22 1,992 1 43 1,000 102 642 0-73 488 IS • 3-07 3.n8 248 2,434 2- 16 1.904 140 970 0-72 465 0'65 435 16 302 3.838 2.69 2,858 212 1,848 1 42 990 0.93 588 0..M 406 17 2-82 3,144 308 3,748 207 1,778 1-54 1,100 0-82 522 065 439 18 2-7« 3,012 304 3,692 204 1,726 1 53 1,100 093 988 0-71 498 ID i 2-7B 3,012 308 3,748 201 1,684 149 1,060 MH 654 0-70 450 20 ' 2-78 3,096 303 3,864 19.9 1,800 1-42 990 0-95 60O 0-61 423 21 ' 2-7« 3,012 306 3,748 1-90 1,540 138 990 0-95 600 0-.M 399 22 2-77 3,034 308 3,748 1.88 1.916 134 910 094 .^94 0-58 414 23 2-8» 3,308 311 3.888 1-88 l..'S16 1-36 9.30 0-93 .S88 083 429 24 317 4,096 3-37 4.620 1-82 1.444 1-32 890 0-93 988 066 438 25 3-28 4,364 3-89 6,140 1-80 1,420 128 890 088 439 096 408 2« 3-20 4,140 3-,M 9,100 1-77 1.384 IM 900 0-44 345 0-63 429 27 30S 3,720 .1 .W 4,420 1 74 1.3(8 128 850 0-45 360 0-86 438 28 2-80 3.100 3-24 4,2.W , 1-72 1,324 1-28 830 0-60 418 0-63 429 28 2-79 3,078 3. 10 3,860 ' 1-86 1,232 1-21 788 0-83 4.35 OM 435 30 2-77 3.034 2-93 3.402 1 1-64 1,228 , 104 654 0-73 468 0-63 429 31 %n 3,078 2-79 2,990 1 1 101 636 0-64 432 Monthly Discharge of Bow River at Banff, for 1912. (Drainage area. \i57 square niilei<.) Dl-StHARUE IV SE(0M>-FEET. Month. Maximum. < Minimum Mean. Depth in Per Square inches on Total in- Mile. Drainage Acre-feet. Area. Januarv ■'17 270 Ml 0-34 Kebnmry 2M 2tl JM ••" Marrh -'44 205 224 0-26 Aprn m 246 295 0-34 \f" 2.470 379 1.48.5 1 73 j™i .1.102 1.000 3,430 4-0O jTf 4.42> If.on 3,566 416 Aiinrt 6.140 -'.434 3,530 412 Se^her 2.79^ i.m I.S47 2-6 Urtotor I. ••Br, MB 1.1117 1 1» November 700 34.5 5M • 0-68 December 492 315 | 429 0-90 The year i 0-.39 17,888 034 15.312 0-30 13,767 0-38 I7..5:w 1-90 91.291 4 46 204.100 4-79 219.280 4 ■75 217,050 2-41 109,903 1-37 62,534 0-76 34,750 0-98 26,378 22 52 1,039,743 «• DEPARTMENT OF THE JJiTVRlOR S GEORGE v., A. 1918 Discharge Meaburbuents of Spray RiviT, 'lear Banff, in 1910. D>t«. Ilyilrographer. i»in. inly M Ai«. ir Aug. 31 a«pt. » Out. 1» Nor. 5 Dm. 1 Dm. M J.C.IMth do do do H. R. CvKalloi.. do do do Width. F«et. 1 m% «»'* 77« Hi 730 ra» 570 UO Aiw .1 Mmii velocity. 8<|. Il h«i(ht. Diii- efaarte. Fmt. Sec.-fl 233-83 ■ n 1 «8 1.483'4« l«t.«7 m 1 M Ml'On M 'M : 4W'03 1 . 4 14 ■v> M7m U ■ ' .". U 454 -SU W' S '» M 312K1 ' ( ' u , I- hit «3 231-9:1 ■2 If U 23IM Daily Gauge Height and Discharge o." Spra;- Tiv ■, i r Banff for 1910. ■1 12 13 14 15 1« 17 18. IS 20 21. 22 23 24 2.1 20 27 28 2« 30 31 DAT. July. Anf»t. i^t«iiib«r. Gm« He^l Di*- Gh(c Di>- I Gum ehwge. |H»i«ht chaive. !H^«ht Dih- chvge. VJBUK Heigh F«»t. 8«!..ft. I FMt. 1-35 1-30 1-25 1-35 1-35 I»» 1 »5 l-*6 l!4S,'i 1. 4.15 1.4V) 2-00 1-ao I 1-75 1.510 1.2D0 1.240 8K.-ft I Fwt. 8«e.-ft. 1-45 1-55 I 1 IS I 1-45 ; 1-45 I 1-60 ' 1-45 1-45 1-40 1-40 ; 1-35 i 1-30 ■■ 1-25 1-25 1-26 ' M2 820 777 M2 8«2 MM l.(H2 iMO DSO IIM HM 950 B50 905 909 8«2 820 777 777 777 -85 -85 -80 -80 -K) 90 90 -85 -85 -85 -80 -80 -80 -8U -80 -85 -85 -90 -90 ■95 480 480 45U 450 450 510 510 480 480 480 450 450 450 450 45U 480 480 510 510 545 December. Gai«f \,^ ■,-<.- * i Gmufe , _._ ght itirmr. Hi nht ,-1 iw HeiiEt ! eharfe. Noobeervatioiu* taktMi for Xovember, Ice condition; durinit Decemlirr Auxiliary Gttujse ujj ;! luring inonlh r>( De, -nib«. Feat. -80 -80 -80 -80 -75 -85 -80 -90 -95 -91) -9U -85 -85 -85 -85 -85 -85 ■85 1-75 ' 1.240 1 -20 735 ! 95 545 80 1 75 1.240 -20 735 95 545 '75 1-70 1.190 ! 15 6»S 95 545 -75 l-tIO I.il90 i -2U 735 »5 .145 -70 1-50 m5 ; l-OS 617 -96 545 -75 1-» 1 9»5 95 545 -90 510 ■70 1-45 1 950 95 -549 '85 480 -DO 1-40 W, \ 90 510 •8-1 48U '00 1-35 !>62 i 90 ol« 85 4X1 ■80 1 35 8«2 8.1 4sn -85 4811 •80 1-SS mi 811 450 "l '80 -ac.-ft 450 450 450 450 422 422 480 480 460 510 545 510 510 48U 480 480 480 480 480 480 450 422 422 3U 422 395 345 345 .'MS 945 345 Diiv I"uet 8« Feet. Ser.-rt 350 1-99 390 1 98 .180 1-72 2611 l-M 235 i-tw 235 1-62 220 1-71 255 l'9« 200 1-4: 170 1 .12 185 1-52 185 1-51 180 1-54 190 1-3S 150 1 49 175 I-.12 185 1-44 165 1-87 240 1-82 220 1'-; 280 1 75 27.1 1 '72 260 1-80 290 1-78 27.'> 1.18 Jill 1-64 230 BOW KlVElt POWER AXD STORAOB »• SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« Monthly Dwcharue of Spray River, near Banff, for 1910. I DrmMtii ana, 3IU aquan milM. ) Dl«cM«lloB IN Hbtunu 'Kbit. RuN-Or». Moxm. Maiimum Minimum. Per Bquju-f mile. Depth in inclie* on Total in Urainace arre-feet. Area- Julv(IJ-3l) .'■ ■ I."" >^ '••M '*'^ -' M 3S.87G fK™r Mi 3M , 443 143 LOS ' 27,2U ThPperiod j I ! j ■ 'M.W tNoobawvalioa* taken for November. Discharge Measurements of Spray River, near Banff, Aha., in 1911. Date. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. Apr. Mny June July Jnly July Au«. Sep. Sept. Oct. Hydrograpber. R. Cancalleli do do do 2S I H. C. Ritchie 1» H. Brown 2 do 22 do 14 V. A. Newhall H. C. Ritehie do B. Raaaell do (Vt. «. Nov 22 Dec. 7 do do do Width. Anao( Heel ion. Xekieity. Oauae Height. 33.5 nt »•( . Sq f( 104 fl 12 Mi Ft. per aec. l.«2 2. 34 2 76 1.99 Feet. •3 30 •2-05 •1-89 -U 75 ; Diacharse. See -ft. 170 3 143. 4 140-2 ll» « «■« 83-7 2.68 •1 02 224 5 n-i ■ 1098 3. 51 •1 35 385-0 t» 3M3 7-05 ' 2 70 2.511 II* 31S 1 6-98 ' 222 2.200 IM-5 i 255 3 5. 8.1 1 80 1,4»4 II7-S , 303.6 j 3-48 1-60 1,058 III 168.7 : .4.42 138 745 8 »2.» 148. 7 4 45 118 661-3 74-5 1190 3. 91 (189 »«« 3 >i2.9 MO 3 61 11-70 .1(1 .i ♦ 1 83-6 3 07 36 ■iS6 7 M.S K7.4 219 0..M 191-1 32 .^ H56 2-40 0-75 201-4 *Auxiliar\ KHUiie. i i t ■ 220 DEPARTMEyT OF TBE IXTESIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Daily Gauok Height and Dibcharqe of Spray River, near Banff, for 1911. DtT. Juuary. Fcbmaiy. March. April. May. Jnw. Gnm HaifEt. eliaiia. ' Gauaa HaicEt { Dia- leharie. Gai H Gauia Dia- ' Gauca It. Haitht. ehaiiw. iHrijiht. chai»e. IH^gEt. ; charge, iehaife. Dia- \ Dia- Faat. i Sae.-lt. Faft. ! Sac.-ft. Feet. | Sec.-Jt. ' F«>t. i 8«c.- 180 t* l-4» I 17* U J.27 ! 18* K 1-20 ' 188 27 1-18 187 28 i a-12 : 188 2t aoo 188 » »-2» ! 181 ai 2-84 IM I 2-47 3-48 2-90 I 2'U I 2-41 i Feet. Sec.-ft. I 2-38 2-25 230 248 2-38 223 220 2' 14 218 2-Ot 2-13 2'On 1-87 2' 10 203 l-W 1-«H 2-10 1<«7 I ti-«e I fi-»ii 2-W I 1-»7| 192 132 153 151 152 149 147 148 192 14* 147 148 149 149 143 145 142 138 144 143 142 141 144 141 141 lU 142 141 1-M 1<«8 < 1-72 I 1-82 ' tin ; 2-03 ' 1-83 IN 1'88 1 188 I l'8t tl-M 200 1-77 2 33 2 II 2-72 2-27 1202 182 1<4« 1-33 ! 1-38 1-2*1 112 I TOM ! 0-84 , 0-80 0-82 0-81 I 0-7* I 140 141 <35 137 140 143 140 142 13« 138 085 i to-ao I 0-75 I 0-73 I 0-74 i 138 0-77 , 140 0-77 1 142 0-77 ' 138 0-78 i 149 0-77 ; 144 •0-78 1 157 u-78 1 1 H7 0-77 1 142 0-79 j 1 187 0-81 1 140 087 140 142 148 180 ISO 154 140 147 144 138 158 140 122 118 lit 0-75 122 0-77 130 0-77 130 fO-77 130 0-78 133 130 130 130 133 130 128 128 130 138 144 1-07 I 110 M4 I 117 : I 28 1-38 tl'35 1-35 1-37 138 1-38 i 1-35 ! 135 : tl'35 1-35 1-38! 1-44 I 1-48 1 t-48 : t-48 I 087 184 0-89 172 tO-92 183 0-96 199 101 320 102 224 1 02 224 102 224 l-OI 220 tl04 233 145 ' 1-46 1-48 1 44 , 1 38 I 1-37 1-34 1 32 ! 1-33 1-37 ! 1-55 248 280 278 292 335 382 382 394 382 383 382 399 438 449 482 449 442 449 449 436 399 394 377 368 372 394 512 1-90 2'20 ; 2'96 i 255 2-38 3-40 I •1-54 153 1-48 152 1-88 2-38 2-65 2-45 2-70 285 2 69 279 268 2-58 252 2-62 2 70 2 96 285 235 235 225 2- 25 232 815 1,190 1,852 1,830 1,484 1.530 1,520 1,502 1,412 1,484 1,476 1,920 2.390 1,910 3.510 2,390 2,390 2,640 2,460 2,220 2,090 2.330 2,510 2.180 2.390 2.500 2.500 2.280 2.280 2,428 'RcadiiDPi made at ragular pauie a{^r Juati 7. tNo ohaervatioaa. laim beifht intrrpolaled. BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAGE 221 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Sa Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Spray River, near Banff, for 1911. — Continued. ! DAT. 1 July. AufHit. 1 September. October. November. Decamber. Guise Di*- MeiiiEt chute. Gu(e Heicht. Du- 1 chante. - Geun Height Du- charge. HeWu.j Dw- charte. Cause Height DiH- charn. H^. Dia- chaqa. 1 J Feet ' 2. 28 2 33 223 2 13 202 1 U 2 » 1 M tl M 1 83 1 82 1 75 1 75 1 75 1 85 1 85 1 to 1 85 1-78 Sec.-ft. 1 2,333 ! 2, 230 1 2.330 1 3.050 1 1,780! I.MO 3,340 ; l.tW 1.3*0 I.4M 1.4«0 1.3W 1,400 1,410 I.3W 1,580 1.370 l.3tD 1.430 Feet. 1 35 1 33 1 98 1 58 1 56 1 33 1 53 1 96 1 96 1 94 1 33 1 30 1 48 1-4: 1 4« 1-43 tl 41 1 37 l'3« 1-38 1 3« 1 32 1 37 1 34 1 33 1 27 1 22 1 18 1 17 1 17 1 18 t Sec. -It. j M5 1.000 1.030 1.020 M3 •80 «80 a«3 989 W 049 «|ll 8MI 870 850 830 7*5 755 743 770 733 723 •M 670 *m 703 670 640 «35 *40 «S0 Feet. 1 22 M8 1-22 l'2« 132 1 l« 1 17 1 13 1 0» 1 07 1 06 1 06 tl (W 1 l» I 112 O.M «8 O'M 0*2 0.«2 031 OM 088 088 084 II 84 83 083 083 080 Sec.-ft. ADO 664 696 7.12 6«« 873 *3« 634 393 57» 372 372 565 965 944 324 318 506 483 483 476 165 «33 l.M 4Jll 430 425 430 410 4«1 Feet. ! 0-79 ' 079 i 0-77 ' 076 : 076 1 73 : 070 i 0-70 om M om' 70 i OM . OM M 067 069 1 064 . 032 0*4 061 II 61 039 039 035 054 044 039 037 032 207 Sec.-H. 395 390 380 370 370 335 340 335 330 323 330 330 315 305 310 305 305 303 300 : ana. 3lii nquarr milei.) Dttmaaog ■» Saceiii>-ri>T. KiK-OrT MllNTH. Miiklliiutn Miniriiuiii Mi-un Per stlUHri' mile. Depth ia iachm . Total fin in Draiaaie acre.|e«t. uSIT IB 'M 143 0461 aHm :::::::'.::::'.:.'.::..' »m n* m om u,v 311 246 3M I 135 JaSi 2,640 I !*IJ 2.III1 649 jIk 1.332 I »•" l.V« 491 "iurt ....::', :;: i.wo ; 685 8i» 257 N-iltemhw ^ i W Itl ! ! J" HecMubw I MB I IM M | »■«« The>'ear ; j \ •*■*" 074 049 53 II 56 13,1M t.in* I.7M •,1U 1 43 7 24 3M 3-«lll t3,M» 119. 1*0 93, 646 50,973 1 96 1 17 ■ 1 81 071 32,370 19. *M 14,44* ll.MI 35e— 18 222 DEPARTMENT OF TEE INTERIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1916 DiscHARQE Measurements of Spray Kiv.^r, near Banff, in 1912. Date. Hydn>(n|ilMr. Area o» Sactkn. Veloeity. Oun Duchnrie. Jm. II Ju. M Ju. SO Feb. » Feb. 14 Fab. N Mar. 4 Mar. IS. Mar. » April •. April a May » May as Jme 3. Joly 17 July SO Am. U Aw. 27 Hapt. 10. Oet. I. Oet. U. Oct. 30 Nov. M Nov. 27 Dae. II. Uee. 24 V. A. Nnrhall do do do do W.Toiaball V.A. NewhaU . H.C Ritchie do do do do do do do do do do do H. R.Cram. .. do H.C. Ritchie do do do do Feet. 8q.lt. |Ft.pereee. Feet. SS'O 7S'40 2«'0 78-4S 2*0 74-10 2S'5 as-so 28'S S8-4S 28S as-ss 28'S as-oi »'0 81-70 28S 71-00 300 02-87 3S9 «2 4S 375 as-so IISS 183 28 loss 130 07 IISS 28138 117-8 314 7S IISS 180-80 II7S 187- U IISS 171-80 iiS'O 138-0 1100 1130 47'S 1 938 S2S •88 38S 71 48 330 8S-SS 3S0 108-0 ISO 1-02 l-tl 3-18 2-44 I 88 1-24 1-44 1-84 I »7 2-41 2-88 3-92 3-72 593 821 448 4-SS 4-38 383 373 3-87 3-34 2-82 1-88 2-00 S-07S 8-83 8-88 8-228 8-088 4-898 8-00 8-r 8- 10 4-73 488 4-79 888 8-88 8-88 a- SO 808 8-30 8-00 880 8-48 827 8-18 4-94 828 8-77 Sec.-ft. 130-0 180-S 141 91 140-80 142-80 12890 84-37 117-84 II2-SS 123-80 180-38 188-48 840-28 917-08 1.888-28 1.118-40 784-70 871-0 787-0 S(l4-0 420-0 341-0 319-0 180-39 144-20 228-72 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Spray River, near Banff, for 1912. D*T. Jaaaary. hSSR Feet. 1 8-83 S-88 S-IO 8-08 S-97 2 3 4 8 S 7 8 « M 8-87 •S80 8-71 8-72 S-IO II S-87 U IS 14 II s-00 8-80 •S«fl SOS M n SIS 8 78 880 880 SSI M 8— ;•:;■: Dia- ehame February. March. Oaaae HeJckl I Hec.Jf. ISSO ISO-0 181-0 ISI-0 IIO-O iso-n 1800 1490 149-0 181-0 ■son 180-0 ISO lano , tsoo 1810 laon 149-0 1490 1490 Die- I Omn eharie Hai(ht charie Feet. 834 8-38 8-78 •8-81 8-81 8 48 8 28 821 821 8-21 •8-21 8 23 8 18 sna 804 887 8-19 •S 19 8 38 808 ti » 33 34 St.. 8: 1*.. B 30 31 •8 81 I s-aa : 8-87 ! 8 82 8-81 888 a 40 •a 30 s-W 8-84 847 Sec.-ft. ' 1440 144-n . 180-0 149-0 149-0 I 147 ! 143-0 ; 1410 ! 141-0 I 141-0 ! 141-0 j 143 ! 140-0 I 137-0 I 137-0 148-0 141-0 ! 141-0 i 142 n 138 Feet. 8-08 4 88 *4-98 8-34 8U 831 8-30 84« S-tS *8-30 8-08 8-10 8-02 4 97 804 8 14 •8- 20 8-08 8-03 SOI Dit- April May. Jane. Oauae i Die- Gaoce Die- Height. ! eharce Heiciil charge 8ec-(t. 138-0 1380 138-0 I 139-0 138-0 ISSO 128-0 141-0 120-0 118-0 103 108 •70 93 99 11 1190 118-n 100-0 •70 Feet. 4 ^2 4-88 4-7« 4-73 4-89 4 79 •4-79 ! 4-83 I 4-AK ; 4 as 488 4 88 •4 88 4 88 4'88 I 488 4-88 •4 88 Cjaiue Heiaht I Die- charie. Hee.-rt. 108-0 108-0 110-0 IIO-O 110-0 1380 128-0 130-0 1340 128-0 I 1380 138-0 130-0 132-0 1340 138-0 I3S0 138-0 1380 Feel. Mec-h. Fret. S«c.-ft. 1490 8 IS 1400 4-88 I490 8 18 1400 4'«8 148 8 18 140 4-88 147 8M 137 •4 88 14*0 •8 08 137 4 81 148 8 03 138 4 88 I8S 4 87 138 4-89 1830 1 4 80 1330 4-M !56-S 4 « t3if> 4-14 1 149 148 •8-14 1 ■BO •10 487 4.7 1380 141 91 488 141-0 83 n •4 87 1811-0 830 4-89 1480 MO 4 72 1880 89-fl 4 72 188 ■8 4 71 ISSO 790 4 70 ISIO 75 n 4 71 lii II < 1340 4 I« IS3 ; I3S0 4 70 4-72 4-73 4-n 4-73 I 4 78 4-82 488 8-07 ! 8-07 i 8 07 •8-SS ; 8 42 808 8(12 a 28 a 22 8 08 •a-fls 8-88 8*4 8-88 8-88 8-83 , 8-84 ' •a- 30 8-33 ! 8 17 e iii 891 8 ar 182-0 188-0 188-0 188-0 iao-0 180-0 I 188-0 204-0 j 387 ' 287 287-0 3740 ! 403 819-0 738 912 881 788-0 788-0 7100 883 814-0 814 808-O 830 888 : MI8-0 : 841 n ! rSK'll 880 8311 8-79 •8-70 88* 8 83 8-87 8 80 8-82 S9S •«(in a 30 8 .'H 8-44 8 88 8 88 8 78 •8 Ml 7-M 748 7 41 7-43 740 729 •7J9 719 7-08 I -WOO 840-0 8380 .W4 474-0 489-0 490 880-0 7240 Mao S77 1.088-0 1.31 18-11 i.*ia» 1,43011 1.488 11 2.8.10 2,390 2.348 2.383-0 2. ,130 2 1880 2.188 2.188-0 1.871 7 18 1,970-0 7IJ 1,918-0 8 8* I 748-11 8 78 i,41ll'l •8 811 1.2340 • (iMia Heiihtu iaieifniated. I MhUliat ""adilioaii (rnni March 10 tn .\pril 13 BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA0E 30 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Spray River, near Banff, for 1912 — Concluded. Day. 1. > 1. 4 a. • 7 8 « 10 II 12 !3 14 IS l« ir 18 la 30 Ji a 23 24 . 2S M 27 28 . 2* 90 . 31 July. Aufttst. oauffe uw* Uauce Du- Heicht chvia HeifEt . eharge Feet. Ute.-tt. Feet. | Sec -It September. October. November. Gftuge Dii*- Gwige I Din- i Gauge i Dw- December. GwKe Di>- Heigfat. eharce Height ' charge i Height . charge. JHeight. chart*. 'a-«e 6M • t? 6-S8 •'•» ••■75 • «l 7ninNci. art.il. :illl Mjuare mileH ) Month Dim H.^Nui IN HnoND Fut Rr.s^irr I>etiih Vvr in incheH Total Matiiiiuiii Mm tnufii Mi.i«i iriiie fin in Draiaage \in>4ml. Afw Jamiary lU I4« IM n «» n .VI » 217 IN) 'H 141 (1 «s n 41 8. KM Mairh 141 » 108 35 It' 40 8.«41 Aaril IM HM 134 n 43 II 48 7.950 Mav •It I IM 517 1 «7 1 92 31.78* Juae 2.S»I 1 4li I.4K 4 116 4 53 r..a«o Julv i.aso 1 \.m I.3M 1 4 SI i l,< 8S.MR \'45-4=t l.flM 779 W7 ! 2 93 3 3S sa.ni Sememlier 828 1 4i* «H ] 2 14 3 39 39.5N lieinber a* 318 4»« 1 W 1 .Ml 28. 348 Xovemlier .un 144 27J 1 w» II Wi l«. 1*1 Deeefflber MS 144 237 i "•• 1188 14 5*4 The»-««t i ! ' 1 a>77 3M.«M 2r,E -18J 294 DEPARTMENT OF TBE INTERIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1918 Discharge Meabubements of Cascade River at Bankhead, Alta., in 1911. Date. Ju. 17 F(b. H Uu. 7 Mar. M Apr. M Aut. 16. Ant. 31 8«pt. I 8(pt. I« Oct. 1« Nor. « Not. is Dae. 8. Vte. n Hydrocrapher. H.R.Canoalba do do do H.C. Ritebia.... H. Bfo«a do do do V. A. Neirhall... do do do do TAt «18'7 4M-4 Ml't M-( 178'( IM-I* l»'3 1030 •No Daily Gauge Height and Dischahge of Cascade River at Bankhead, Alta., for 1911. DAT. October. November. Deoamber. ^^V I P'*' .9*^ ^^^ Q***' I I^>*- Gaute Die : Gsuta Dia- Height.charn. iHeitft. eharaa. Heicht.j ehane. Haicht. ehaiie. Height chai^ Feat. 1 j:::::;:::::::;:;::::::::::::::" ::::::■ 1 4 : 4 , 1. 7 8 : • 10 11 11 11 14 It It 17 I'M fl'M tl'tl 1 M 1 48 I 4« 1 to 1 an 1 « 1 to I'tO 1 M 1 44 1 40 1 M I'M 714 701 11 It 10. 67A m 0M 11 619 n a M ■a W>l M «.. a. loe us » M, M! 530 11 4M Sae.-it. Feat. Sae.-ft. Faat. j Sae.-tt. ' Feat. 11 428 H 410 11 j 401 » 3W 18 374 480 too 4M 4M 901 484 478 Ml 447 4M 380 343 3M 318 310 313 313 304 *H IN 1 08 107 l'0« 108 104 I 04 I 03 1 03 I OS 102 too O'M O'M 0'»7 U'M I O'M O'M U W ! »2 : O'tl i O'lo ON I 0'87 I «'S6 O'M O'M tNe ebaamtkia, gaaaa balght iatarpola. id. lUaocB earriad away hv iea oa Nov. I«. K<»lae«U D»r » Nora -Not aal Bu iia l data «e aoMpala daily diadwigN attar Nov. 8. IM 287 280 274 287 2M 2H 287 IM 247 102 2M 102 244 I'Ca 2tO I 01 238 101 2M 228 223 218 214 lot Mt mo IM Itl 187 183 I7t 171 167 in IM O'M O'U O'U OH 0'87 O'M 0-80 on O'M I 08 I'M ' I to I'M 1 7S I 7f I '73 l'4( e-ft. ! Feet. IM IM IM 1*7 171 I7t Sae.-tt. 0'7S 0'7i 0,83 l'22 I '42 I 82 1 97 3'27 2 S2 2-72 301 117 1(7 2 r I 87 I U lU 1 77 ITT in I'M IS l'« I'lT BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAOB SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Monthly Discharge of Cascade River at Bankhead, Alta., for 1911. (Dninaie ma. 248 iqiiara milM.) DncHAHGI IN SCCOND-FUT. RvM-On. MoKTR. Maximum. August (t«-3l)... September October November (M).. The period 714 Ml 296 m Heu. «24 411 m IM Per Muare mile. Depth !■ inches oa < Total ia Draiwce I ur»4e*t. 2-516 I.JO 1«,8(B 1-697 1 1-85 24,4(6 O'tll 1 l.Ot 11.666 0.68* 1 Olt l.»76 iU 60,111 DiacHAROE Measurements of Cascada River at Bankhead, in 1912. Date. Hydrofrapher. Width. .\rea I of .Section. Meu Velocity. Gum Hei(fit. Dieehaig*. Jaa. 2» V. Feb. 8 Feb. 20 Feb. 27 Mv. 27 H April 12 April 26 May « May 11 June 7 June 18 July 17 July 30 Au(. 17 Aac. 28 Sept. 11 Oct. 2 H. Oct. 21 H. Oct. 29 1 Nov. It Nov. 29 Dec. 12 1 Dec. 31 i Feet. A. Newhall do do do . C. Ritchie. do do du do do do do do do do do U. Cram C. Hitchii.- . do do do do do 4S'J 430 24. S 18'J 4S (I 46. 41-U 460 490 44. !».3 39.5 3S.0 490 ,1; 3 se I U 2 S|.(l an 51 4 96. II .^7•o 52 Sq.ft. 164.2 163. 7 22. 6 19. 1 81.1 76. 3 746 100.« 104.1 66. 6 182. 8 424 44-5 1382 192. 3 187. 124. 121-6 1262 1098 146-1 142-0 118-4 Ft. perMC. 0-66 0-75 1-83 3-37 0-86 0-78 0-77 1-73 2-52 071 7. 92 0.39 034 7-35 7-48 6-23 2-39 2-ni 2-08 1-37 302 2 70 1-84 Feet. 3.03 3. 21 2. 91 1.78 1-36 1 32 1-14 1-81 1-97 1-24 3-30 0-84 n-84 296 3-65 3-30 2-48 236 2. 36 206 266 2.S6 2 25 See.-tt. 106.4 113-3 41-4 64 S 666 57-7 57-S 174 -S 261-« 47. t 1,446-0 16-4 154 1.161 1 l,4M.O 1,164-6 296-0 M48 161-6 1506 447* 3M4 11*0 226 DEPARTMENT OF TEE INTERIOR 6 QEORQE v., A. 1916 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Cascade River at Bankhead, for 1912. 7. 8 9 . 10.. u 12 . 13.. 14.. IS.. IC. 17.. 18.. 18.. 20.. 21 22. 23. 24 2S 20 27. 28 2« 30. 31.. Day. Jamiar}-. February. GMue I Dia- Gman I Dii- Gmicb Dis- Height. I eharte. Hniht. | ehatfe. Heicht. '. charts. March. Feet. I Sec.-lt. Feet, i Sec.-tt. ■. Feet. ' 8oe.-ft. 2-32 I 2 17 207 2-27 0) 74-8 I 70-8 ■ 78-8 ' (S) S'2I S42 t45 5'4S 9. 42 4-77 4-47 427 I 3-87 j 3'«2 3-72 I 3-77 4-37 j SOI S'32 iU : S17 ; 3'«7 3'»2 347 3-27 311 2'«2 , 2-87 IM'O 209. 2060 2a«'0 206-0 17«'0 l«7'0 IM'O 1430 133-0 1370 I3».0 163-0 1380 201 2020 199-0 136-0 133-0 127-0 ll»-0 112-0 109-0 103-0 2-82 I 2-77 , 2-72 I 2-87 . 2-62 i 2-67 I 3-28 ! 3-22 ' 3-15 i 2-77 ! 2-<0 2-47 2-32 2-29 2-30 2-22 2-17 2-12 2-07 2-02 2-41 2-14 2-10 2-07 1-77 1-82 1-78 2-62 257 I 101 -0 M-8 968 94-8 »2-8 90-8 119-0 117-0 , 114-0 I 98-8 92-0 8«-8 80-8 78-0 80-0 76-8 74-8 72-8 70-8 68-8 84-4 73-4 72-0 70 S 60-8 I 62-8 61-2 88-8 90-8 2-42 2-92 2-62 2-67 1-04 3-06 3-n 1 3-67 i 3-99 i 3-07 ! 2-72 2-42 2-72 2-67 3-07 267 2-37 1 1-79 I 97 1-87 I (2) 84-8 88-8 92-8 194-8 110-0 I 110-0 ' 139-0 131-0 130-0 I 111-0 I 96-8 84-8 I 96-8 M-8 111-0 94-8 ' 82-8 61-6 : 66-8 63-8 April. Gam Heis le I Dia- it. : charge. j 1 36 99-6 ' 2-09 303-0 , 1-93 910 1 48 81-0 1 39 580 (II— Ice flooded. (2)— Rod carrieil out by ice. (3)— Dam cIomihI.— River dry. (4) — River practiratly dry. (5)— Kitreme flurtuatiam caiued by dam above station. Feet. iSec.-ft. 1-23 1-70 1-98 1-98 1 26 1 29 1-26 1-24 1-33 1-39 1-35 1-32 1-33 ' 1-34 1-35 1-41 I 1 41 1-42 . 1-38 139 1 31 1-28 1-39 1-35 1-39 1-39 1-34 1-34 1 32 1-33 May. Gauge Dia- Height . , ebarge. Ffrt. Sec.-ft. 42-6 136-0 261-0 1020 49-0 45-0 45-2 43-8 95-2 { 58-0 i 58-0 53-8 I 59-2 I 96-6 98-0 I I 67-8 I 67-8 I 69-6 ! 62-8 I 58-0 I 52-4 48-6 t .WO 58-0 I 58-0 , 98-0 96-6 96-6 58-8 55 2 I 37 1-39 1-43 1 45 1 95 1 59 I 63 1-82 1-90 1-29 2-10 222 2-38 2-36 2-28 2-20 2-29 2-07 2-10 2-13 3-12 2-19 2-10 2-25 2-33 2 28 220 2-10 198 June. Gauge I Dis- Height charge. 61-3 64-4 71-4 79-0 ' 99-0 I 99-0 I 111-6 : 181-2 I 220-0 ! 230-0 290-0 ! 267-0 I 239-0 ! 421-0 i 467-0 I 932-0 467-0 405-0 444-0 316-0 ' Feet. (3) 1 49 1-49 1 43 (3) , 1-10 1-24 . 2-0O ' I'M 1-99 1-75 1-90 2-20 2-69 I 2-47 444-0 908-0 467-0 406-0 335-0 261-0 Sec.-ft. Nil. 79-0 79-0 71-4 Nil. 29-0 43-8 272-0 39-U 95-0 152-0 220-0 406-0 792-0 626-0 339-0 3-25 1 3990 3 29 i 349-0 3-22 369-0 3-20 1 409-0 3 19 ^ 3-15 I 1287-n 3-33 1478-0 3-35 { 1900-0 3-31 1456-0 3-29 : 1434-0 1390-0 1390-0 13.99-0 1338-0 1287-0 3' 10 1330-0 3-00 I 1136-0 2-00 i 2710 W BOW RIVER POWER A\D STORAGE 227 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Cascade River at BanLhead, for 1912. — Concluded, DAT. July. August. September. October. November. December. Guiie Height Di»- charge H^X Dii- charge Uauie Height. Dis- oharge Sec.Jt. 174 174 171 168 174 174 Nil. Nil. 1.132 1,061 135 157 201 320 332 398 414 437 39 32 302 282 292 .302 308 :W2 3't8 ■.m 30S 308 Gauie Height Feet. 2-46 2-46 2-46 2-46 2-47 3-47 346 2-46 2 45 3-45 2-43 2-42 2-38 2 33 2-32 2-30 2-31 2 35 2 36 2-37 2-36 2 -.36 2 35 2,15 23.5 2-35 2-35 2-3.5 2 35 2-47 2-55 Di«- charge. H^eSg?. Dis- ohacge. Gwige Height. Dis- charge. 1 Feet. t t t t t.... ■ *i:i5- 3-15 3-25 3-75 3-35 3-32 3-13 3-08 3-09 I:::. t 1::::;: t 1:::::: t t t t {:::::: 084 0-72 ■Sec.-ft. 15-00 14-80 14-80 14-80 14-70 14-60 34- 1,287 1,390 888 1,500 1,359 1,256 1,216 1,205 17-0 16 44 1632 16 13 16-00 15-93 I5-9I 15 80 15-70 15 6) 16-6'l 15 45 15-40 15-38 15-39 8-30 Fret. 0-78 0-79 0-75 0-77 0-78 0-78 0-75 78 1-65 303 3-08 2-06 2-20 2-50 2-5S 293 •2 97 3-47 355 3-55 353 3-53 3-50 3 42 344 354 3-73 •3-65 3-55 3-50 2- 15 Sec.-tt. 13 14 10 12 13 10 10 13 120 291 322 309 405 654 709 1.065 1,105 1,695 1.650 1,625 1.560 1,525 1.450 1.3:10 1.325 1,395 1,570 1.443 1.336 1.285 174 Feet. 2 IS 2-15 2 14 2-13 2' 15 2-13 ■ 3-.35' 3-28 202 2 10 3-23 348 2-51) 26) 2-82 3-65 1-30 1-35 2-4.5 , 2:1- 2-4:1 , 24.5 2 4li 2-45 2-46 2-45 2 46 2 46 Sw-ft. 308 308 308 308 314 314 308 318 392 303 392 287 267 245 240 232 336 253 2.58 262 258 258 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 314 362 Feet. 365 2-66 3-64 3-45 3 35 3-28 3-2.5 2 23 3-38 3-37 3-37 3-27 338 3 U 3-07 2-12 2-30 3-70 1-95 1 93 1-93 1-90 1 95 1-97 2-30 2-95 2-95 2-95 2-66 2-62 Sec.-ft. 437 445 439 302 212 231 313 212 324 330 220 320 334 160 149 164 3:12 479 117 113 107 107 117 122 233 734 724 734 445 414 Feet. 3-60 3-53 2-49 2-45 3-30 2-15 2.30 3-18 3-17 3-15 3-75 3-60 3-5» 2-50 245 2-42 245 2-70 2-68 2-64 2-60 2-55 2-50 243 2-75 2-40 2 35 2-31 225 2-27 2-25 SK.-ft. 398 3 350 336 302 6 S 332 174 7 193 » 186 9 183 10 174 11 523 12 398 13 14 384 333 15 303 15 386 17 302 18 479 19 461 20 429 21 22 23 34 25 26 27 28 29 .TO 31 396 362 332 292 522 376 253 »6 ; 312 330 313 * Chaacuis fNNiditioRs from Auft. 17 to Aug. 28 t Gaoge not read. Hiwhanp' estimuterharer due to operation e>f duin atwve. Monthly DiscHARtiE of Casrud*' RivtT at Rankhoad, for 1912. (lirainuKe urea, 248 square miles ) .Month DUKB.tlial IN «t(-ONO-F»T Ri-sfOrr. .Maxnnuili. Miniiiiuni Mi<»n Her Siiuari- Mil.- Depth in inched (HI Dnii.iagi' Area. Total in .\rri'.fw*t. January (1-4 i-^l) 206-0 IM-0 30)0 2610 .W3-0 i,«n-o 1,5000 1.6950 M7-U I.3B2-0 7240 5330 70-H 60-8 58-0 436 63 1 Nil. 8-5 to Nil 2:120 107-0 74-0 US 7 85- 2 101 A AA A .1111 4 648-4 3.37 K 7880 289-2 2711-11 3904 313-8 0-61 0-34 41 27 1 22 2 Al 1 3A 3 18 1 17 1 12 1 17 1 27 0-62 0-37 (1-38 » 30 1 41 2-91 1 57 3 67 1 31 1 29 1 31 1 46 8,258 4.901 Marrh 1 1--21 27 Jl) 5.inN Vpril 3.9H3 \(„v 18.. 532 .18,583 Julv 20.767 .\U||U»t 48,452 17. SIM 17. IW. 17,280 19. 395 Thepcriori 16 80 219.373 DEPAHTMBXT OF THE INTERIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1916 Discharge Measubehents of Devil's Creek, near Bankhead, in 1910. D*t«. JmM July 8«pt. Oct. Nov. Dm. ISIO. Hydrofimpber. Width. i.e. Kaith. do I do I do do I do I H. R. Cxm do do do FMt. 23 2S M 2S 24 2« 24 24 24 24 Areftof nctioa. Sq.ft. iili 44-10 33M 4Me 2»'30 3160 30- 7S MM 29'W 27' 12 Ueu Tcloeity. Ft. per we. 3 M 425 343 3'»3 2-77 3-'S3 ai'H H'lO Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Devil's Creek, near Bankhead for 1910. D«T. June. July. G« iBei imtmf Dw- I Gaace : Dit- leic&t. chuie.'Heicht : chuse I ^ j Feet. Sec.-(t. I Feet. | See.-tt. Aucuat. September. Grae I Die- GMice ^ Die- Height. ohariejHeiibt. charm. n t till 7 (. (.. 10. II.. 12.. 13 . 14. 15 M.. 17. 18.. I*.. 20.. 21.. 22.. 23 . 24. 25 . 2« . 27 . 28 2» 30.. 31.. I'M 1'89 1'84 1'85 I'85 1'8D 1'78 l'78 ! 1-78 I 1-78 1«3 IN IM I4« 14« 131 126 lit 12« 12« '87 '86 1'76 121 1'85 1'76 . 121 1'84 1'75 ' 1185 1 81 1'74 , 1164 1'81 1'72 1122 1'80 I '72 112 2 1'81 1 72 112 2 I'Sl l'7(l 108 1 76 l'6W IM'3 1 73 l'«» t06'3 1 71 1'68 104 6 1'69 I'M M'S 1 66 I'M 97 9 1 68 I'«2 94'7 I'69 1 1» 901 1-64 1'59 1 90' 1 l'62 I'M 90 1 1 60 1511 90' 1 1 58 1 5» 90' 1 1 .W 1 Jtt 901 l'«ll 1'5»| 90' 1 1 60 I Feet. , See.-It. Feet. 1-57 1-57 1-57 1'5« 1-65 1-81 1'86 87'3 87'3 87'3 i 85-9 99'5 134 149 149 153 149 146 I 143 134 134 131 158 1'5« 1'56 1-56 1'59 1'60 1'60 1'62 1'60 1-58 1 59 1'58 1'58 1'57 1'57 i 134 1 56 134 1 5« 121 1-59 II4'3 1 62 110' 1 1'64 1063 1 64 101 2 1 64 IIM 6 1 64 99 5 1'64 979 1 82 M'7 I'6ll 91 '5 l'60 88'7 16) 88-7 1 .W 91 '5 1 55 91 5 Sec.-ft. 88'7 85-9 85-9 85'9 90- 1 91'5 915 94-7 91-5 88'7 90' 1 88'7 88'7 87'3 87-3 85-9 85'9 90-1 94'7 97-9 97'9 97'9 97'9 97 9 94'7 91'5 61'5 96'3 88'7 84'5 BOW RiVER POWER AWD STORAOB 289 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Devil's Creek, near Bankhead, for 1910.— Continued. Day. 1 i October. November. December. Grate 1 Du- HM(Et.|cli>ne Grace ! Die- Grace Height i charge Height. Die- charge. 1 1 1 ! Feet. I'68 l'S7 I'M I'M 1'52 1 53 1 57 l'53 1 55 I'M I'M 1 53 1 SI 1-47 1-48 l'48 1 49 I'SI 1'48 l'4« l'45 l'45 1-42 1-41 1 4« 1-42 1 41 l'38 l'37 l'39 1 37 Sec.-lt. 88'7 87'3 85-9 859 80'9 821 87'3 821 84'S 8S'9 85'9 821 79-7 74-9 7« 1 7«'l Feet. Sec.-tt. I'39 MS I'M ; 63 5 I'M ! MS I'39 MS I'M 63 5 l'40 675 1-40 1 «7'5 I'M 1 M'S I'M , US 1 37 i MS 1'37 M'5 I'M U'S 1 M i 63-5 1 37 1 M-5 1'37 ! M'5 Feet. 1'28 1'32 l'30 1'2S 1'24 1-25 1-24 Seo.-ft. M'4 3 . M'g 3 ... M 4 M 5 S3 Q M 83 1-20 SO 9 l'33 1'2S 1-19 MS 1-12 1-20 I'2S 118 l'20 1'20 118 1 20 M« MS 114 1 18 118 1'20 1 13 Ml 1 12 1 11 110 SO'7 54 It 49 12 4« 13 t! 14 sn 15 M 18 .37 MS 63 S «3'5 «3-5 60-7 MS M-5 62 5 63 S 62 S 62 S 60-7 MO MO MO 49 77'3 1 1'36 79'7 1 I'M 7»'l 1 I'M 73-7 1-33 72'5 1'37 72'5 , 1'37 09 S ! 1 M 68.1 1 1 M 73'7 j l'3S S9'S ' 1 3S 68 5 i l'33 65'5 l'3t) MS ! 1'30 1 MS 1'30 tl 52 51 20 54 $2 22 , 52 23 S2 24 23 M M 61 M U 29 M U 1 •*■* 1 lee eonditHWi! from Doc. Iftth to Dec. 31it. Monthly DiscHARCit: of Dtvirs (Yoek, near Bankhead, for 1910. ( Urain:>«e area. 58 stiuare milea) MONTM. ane(11»-30) July Atuniflt ■ . Svptvniber. October ... November. December.. The period DlSCHAROt IN .**ErOND-FlET RuN-OTf' Depth I Per in inches i Toul Mein square on 1 ■<■ mile. Dminnge 1 acre-teet. area. 171 M-7 3'2« 1 45 4.490 I6'1 9.1' 1 114 7 l'98 2'28 7.052 153 !(7'3 1141 1 96 2'2« 7.017 57-9 S4'5 an.M I .«! 1-74 5. -194 .S8'7 MS 77 03 1 .11 ' S 4,7M 675 MO «3'63 I'lW ' S 1 3.786 61 44 S3M '925 1'0« 1 3.298 .1 38.773 230 DEPAltTMErST OF TBE INTERIOR S GEORGE v., A. 1910 Discharge Measurements of Devil's Creek, near Bankhead, Alta., in 1911. D*t«. Hydracnpbcr. J»ll. J7— H. R. CarMsUen. Feb. 14 n^^anoun Mar. 7 do Mar. 24 do Apr. 2« H. C. Ritchie.. May 10 do Jnaa 2 B. Riueell Jus 17 do July IS do Am. It Hcpt. 1 do . . 8«|it. 19 do Oct. It V. A. Newhall Not. t do Nov. 23 do D«e. 8 do Dec. 22 do Dec. 27 do Width. Feet. 34 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 23 25 25 25 25 24 2< 24 22 20-5 Area of Section. Sq.ft. 2«'» 24-4 22 2 1»4 30. 1 22. i M-» 55 ',•■4 50 4 4t'« 4«'5 401 33-4 30-8 38t 20-4 21't Meaa Velocity. Ft. 341 IM 1-85 l-7« 1 »3 2-10 3' 15 4 33 4' 13 4'2D 3-84 3M 305 2-78 2-38 2-37 l» 1-77 Gauaa Heiiht. Feet. Ml 107 101 0'«4 I 03 1-15 t'53 I'M 1-87 1-88 l-7» 1-78 I'St 1-42 1 2« l'2t 1-22 1-27 Diacharte. 8«!.-ft. 34 • 38. 8 41 34 > 38. • 465 I12'« 238-4 2040 211-8 178-0 171 I 122-t »2<» 733 67-7 36-0 38-8 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of 1911. Devil's Creek, near Bankhead, for D*r. Januar}-. Game i Die- Heicht . I charce. 1 Feet. 1-02 2 090 3 4 0»1 0-88 5 0-88 « 0-91 0-93 X . 0-92 0-91 0-97 1-01 1-06 1-09 1-08 1-10 1 11 1 11 1 10 1 10 1 12 l-l« 1-lH 1 17 1-17 1-10 1-10 lU 1-20 1 15 1 15 1-13 9 ... in 11 12 13 14 . . 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2« ... 27 28 29 30 31 49 45 42 40 40 42 44 4« 43 47 I 50 j 55 I 58 j 57 59 I 61 I 61 60 ! ao I 62! 67 ■ 6» m 68 62 63 65 72 65 64 February. Gauce I Die- Heicht . I chiuie. Feet. 1-13 1 13 1-12 1-10 1-11 1-12 1-10 1-11 1-12 1-08 I 1-08 I 1-06 i 1-08 I 1-07 I 1-08 i 1-07 1 07 1-08 1-08 1-08 im 1-09 \m ■ 1 07 1-09 1-07 MO 1-07 Sec.-ft. 60 56 56 53 53 .53 50 49 49 44 43 41 40 March. Gauce Heicht 40 40 ' 41 : 41 40 ! ti\ 42 I 43 I 42 i ** i 43 Feet. 1-09 1-06 1-07 1-05 I 16 1-02 1-03 1-05 1 05 1-00 1-00 l-IIO 1-00 1-02 1-00 1-00 ! "96 I 0-95 1-nn I O-SM I 0-96 '' 0-95 0-97 ■ l-(l() i l-o:) 0-90 I II-6U i 11-50 0-80 I 1-00 { 1-02 ! Dii- charte. Sec.-Jt. 44 43 43 43 4t 41 42 43 43 39 39 39 39 40 39 39 37 36 38 36 I 94 I 35 j 36 ' 37 37 I 32 ' n 19 28 37 38 April. Gauce Heicht Feet. 102 1-02 t-01 1-02 1-03 1-02 1-01 1-00 1-01 l-OI 1-01 1-01 1-01 1-01 1-00 0-81) i 0-90 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1 01 1-00 1-00 1-02 1-03 1-04 1-06 1-Ot Di«- charco. Sec.-ft, 38 37 38 38 38 :<8 38 38 37 28 .12 57 37 37 37 37 38 37 37 3S 40 39 40 40 May. June. Gi HeicI auce ^ht Feet. 1-06 1-06 1-07 1-07 1-07 1-10 110 1-11 1-09 1 10 1-12 1 14 1-18 1-20 1-20 1-23 1 24 1 23 1 25 1-24 1-24 I 1 25 1-33 : 1.32 I 1 33 I 34 i 1-33 134 1-30 I 33 1 .19 Dis- oharce. Sec.-ft. 41 41 41 41 41 43 43 44 42 43 47 49 52 55 56 59 61 61 I 65 65 I 66! •; 76 76 78 80 81 77 81 89 Gauc Heich Die- Feet. 'Sec.-ft. 145 1-54 1-66 1-66 1-67 1-70 1-68 1-66 1-68 1-71 1-77 1-8A 1-tM 1-99 1-99 1-99 201 I-9D 1-08 ! 1-97 1-97 ! 2 06 . 2-07 2-06 i 2-06 2-08 2-08 2-09 9« 116 144 144 146 149 154 149 144 149 157 174 201 223 238 251 251 251 359 251 347 347 242 281 286 2S1 281 290 290 3»S BB BOW RIVER POWER AXD STORAGE 231 .cSSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Heioht and Discb*rok of Devil's Creek, near Bankhead. for 1911 —Continued. D»T. July. Auciut. Oftuce Dill- 1 Gauce H«cnt. charce. IHnnht i 1. 4. i. S 7. 8 9 to. II. 13. 13. 14 IS. 16. 17. IS 1«. » 21 n. 23. 34. a M. 27. 28 2» 30 31 Feel. tjec.-(t. Feet. 202 I'OO 201 1 M 1 W l-M 1 MM 1-97 1-93 I 2«4 j 2M I 259 ; 2il I 2SI I I 247 ! 247 242 1-91 IM 219 1 211 I'M 208 l-HH 208 1-87 204 1 U 197 1'8» 191 1 U 191 IHJ 191 1»2 188 1-79 179 1-79 179 1-79 179 1-78 178 1-78 17« 1-77 174 1-73 182 1 71 1S7 1-71 isr 1(19 151 1 09 IJI 1-68 149 Dia- charie. 1 70 1-72 1-7S 1-78 1-79 1-90 1-88 190 189 1-91 1-87 1-88 189 1-88 1-87 1 W 1-86 ! 1-84 I 1-89 1-87 1-89 180 1-79 1-78 Hec-ft. 154 lao l«8 176 179 191 208 215 223 226 215 206 215 211 219 211 204 208 211 208 204 211 201 194 208 211 2m 197 182 179 tiefitember. October. November. Deeember. OiMlce • Die- | (jause I Die- | GauKe j Din- j Gauge HeUtht . I charge. Height . ' charge. Height . charge, i Height . eet. Sec.-ft. 1-79 179 1 77 174 1-80 182 l'8K 208 1 90 215 1-89 211 1-88 208 188 208 188 208 1 X« 201 1.8« 201 1 W 197 1-81 185 I'M) 182 IM) 182 1-78 176 1-78 176 1-78 176 1-78 176 178 176 178 176 177 174 1-77 174 1-73 162 1-70 154 1 60 151 1 69 151 1-68 149 1 66 144 1 67 146 1(8 1-68 166 1-65 1 61 161 1-61 160 160 I 61 1-59 1-59 1-59 1-57 1-56 156 1-54 1 55 1-55 1-54 I 1-53 1-54 I 1'54 ! 1 52 j 1-52 { 1-50 I ISO 147 1-47 1-47 I 1-47 149 149 144 141 131 131 131 129 129 131 127 127 127 122 118 120 116 118 118 116 114 116 116 112 112 108 108 102 102 102 102 1-47 1 46 I 45 1-46 1-46 1-45 1-45 1-47 1-47 I 45 1-42 1-40 1'3» 1-40 1 35 137 I 36 1-39 1-39 tl 39 1-36 1-35 130 1-33 1-33 1:16 I 38 1 :17 1-38 1-29 102 100 98 100 100 98 98 102 102 98 93 go 89 90 1-31 1-33 1-33 1-29 1-31 1-21 1-34 1-28 1-29 1-26 1-25 1-29 1 22 125 1 11 1 25 1-22 1-21 1-22 MO 108 1-22 1-22 1-28 1-28 1-28 1-27 1-22 1-21 1-21 tl-21 Dit- charge. Sec.-»t. 76 78 78 73 74 64 76 69 69 64 61 63 54 54 42 50 46 43 43 34 31 36 36 40 40 40 39 36 36 36 36 t No obwrvatton, gauge height interpolated. Monthly Discharge of Devil's ("reck, near Bankhead, Alta., for 1911. (Drainnse area, .58 :4guui t> mile«. ) MnNTll. Januury. . . February . March . .\pril May June July . .\ugUKt . September.. tJctober . . . . N'ovi-mber December. . The year. . . niMCHAKOK IN SKM).FEET. Hi.N-Orr. .Muxiniuni. Minimum 611 41 40 80 2S5 264 226 215 149 102 78 Mean 41 98 149 154 144 102 74 31 Her Hquare mile. Depth in inches on Drainage area. 56 2 0969 1 12 45 2 0.779 81 37 .5 : II !H7 75 37 4 ' til5 0-72 .».4 ! 1024 1 MS 213 : 3 673 4 1(1 201 ! 3-466 4 no 199 1 3-431 3-96 180 1 3-103 346 122 2- lit) 2-42 •to 1 IS.M 1-73 52 t 0-898 1-04 Total in acre-feet. 25-29 3.456 2.510 2.306 2.-226 3,652 12,674 12,359 12,236 10,711 7,901 5,35.1 3,304 73,1'JO DEPARTMENT OF THE lyTEHlOR 5 QEORQE v., A. 1S15 Discharge MiAstJREMKNTS of Kananaskis River, near Kananaskis, Alta., for 1911. Dm*. Fdh 11 Mar 4 Mir 22 Hum • n«m. 1« oT 13 Not J4 T>w 11 Hydrocrapliar. Width. H. R. CsTMallM.. do do H. Bitnra do V.A. Nawhril... do do Fm. K » «■• til •OS u u Am of Sntion. Sq.ft. •••8 •8-4 ••'1 1788 143^ 101 '3 740 •07 Mau Valoeity. HriJK. D'whane. Ft. FaM. IW 1-87 2U S« • 04 3-77 i'88 2-38 703 • M S'7^ •'•2 • '•2 S«c,-ft. 131 7 10».4 122-8 1,014-7 7240 371. • 213-1 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Kananaskis River, near Kananaskis Alta.. for 1911. DAT. Scptunbar. October. November. Deoember. GaocB HalX Dia- eharga. Oaun Hi^. ehuie.'HeiX Die- eharte. Gwiie HeicEt Dia- charge. 1 Faat. • -73 • 72 •-74 7-34 7- 10 700 ••88 «-78 • 71 • •3 •-•1 • -S8 • 54 • 53 •-48 • 43 t-3« • -30 • 30 • 23 • IS • 17 •-12 • 08 • OS • 01 5-99 5-98 S-90 ••88 SteAt. Ml Ki 885 1,188 1.047 998 93^ 875 850 809 799 784 784 759 733 708 •73 842 842 •07 588 577 551 S3I 518 498 485 480 440 430 Faet. 583 585 5-81 5-80 5-78 5-75 S-71 S-89 5-70 5-88 5-87 s-a« S 85 S-«8 5-64 S 83 S-84 5-82 581 550 5-58 557 Sae.-rt. 404 415 394 389 389 384 344 334 339 329 324 318 313 318 308 303 308 298 293 283 278 273 Feet. 5-37 5-40 5-38 S3S 534 53« 5-38 5-30 525 5-25 S-25 8ae.-(t. 172 187 177 182 157 187 177 138 111 111 111 Faet. Sec.-ft. 2 . 3 ■;:: ;■; 5-18 5-15 S-14 5 15 5-18 513 5-12 5-10 511 4 • « 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS :. .'.'.'.'..'.. i« 17 18 19 .'i-25 ! S-.15 1 20 :...::::;::;;: 21 22 .'.'.'.'.'. \\'.'.'.'.'.'.. '.'.'. ' 1 5-33 331 530 5-29 5-28 528 5-:n 5-20 5-18 5-17 5 15 5-14 1 2*'..'.-''..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.''.'.'.'.'.'..' .' .'. 25 5S8 288 555 283 554 258 "5-24 ■ .'.'. i 2« 27 28 5-4S i 212 iV 207 54J %-ai 29 30 '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. 31 ; . . i 1 IIS For BOW RnEll POWER AXD STORAOE 233 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« Monthly Discharge of Kananaskis River, near Kananaski^, Alta., for 1911. I Dniinaie »n*. 406 nquare milfM > DncHAiKu nt SKONb-Fin. RiN-Or». Month. W.4 !2.g 14.7 14.0 i-» 3-1 J. 9 Masiinum. Mtumum. September t.Mg 1 430 October 4M I 187 November (l-l I) IW j JU Theperiod I ..\ ., Mean. 715 3011 Per mjiura mile. Dmth Drmimce arm. 2.«8 Total in acre-feet. l.7»l i 0.739 1 0374 19* 089 015 42.544 IB,44« 3.31« »«.3U7 DiscHAKGE Measurements of Kananaskis Rivt-r, near Kananaski^, in 1912. 18, Date. Hydrocrapher. Width. I Ana 1 at Section Mean Veloeitj Gauge HeiKbt ' Diaeharge. Feet. Sq. ft. Ft. per sec. ta^: Sec It. Jan. Jan. Feb. Feb. Feb. Mar. Mar. Mar. April April April Mav May June June July Julv Aug. Aug. litpt. *>ept. Oct. Oct, Nov. Nov. Dec. Dec. V. A, H.C >hall . Ne do do do du do Ritchie do do do do do do do do -2.i 160- 20 58-0 60 90 224 6 3.'. 135-.W 800 64. SO 2-19 6 .S" 1411.5 60- 1) .5850 1 79 604 ll>4-6!> 600 69. (M 1 87 647 l2.'5-00 Sluah we to bott oni. 590 S8'4t) 2-20 5 10 128. 71 60.0 64. 50 2-20 3 08 143. 44 580 64. 38 229 5 12 147.89 80-0 108.70 402 998 427 23 M .5 151 93 568 6-75 863.33 62. U 14155 5 47 662 77409 650 271- tt« 6 U 8 -.37 1,661.56 660 321. 30 841 8-92 2,70795 CSO 245. 40 7. 14 7-87 1,715.2S 63 S 205. 35 639 7. 10 1,312. 99 64-11 204 70 5. 89 7-20 1,20500 65 1 144 40 J. 11 6. 34 738. 30 60.11 116.110 4. SO 6 05 55800 600 96-80 3.77 S 60 36500 9».0 96-20 4.07 .549 391.90 58. 84.7)1 3. 5.5 5 24 301.011 .57. 5 82 53 348 5. 16 287-011 600 13000 2. 30 6 94 299. 14 560 121. 00 198 9. 90 19040 234 DEPARTUEUT OF THE JSTESIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1916 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Kananaskis River, near Kananaskis. for 1912. DAT. 1 2. 1.. 4., (.. 6.. 7.. 8.. • . 10. 11.. M 11 14 . M If . 17 . M. . !• 10 . 11 . a . u.. M . ».. M.. r.. M.. Juuary. Gu(p H S M S'83 S'83 3-80 6'On 420 Du- ebati* 141.73 14415 laow 134 IS 134 23 134' 23 148.00 Ml. 73 143.00 144-23 144 23 14173 14030 I3DK l&l'73 123 23 124-88 124 (1 124 23 121.18 121 (3 m (3 1 23 38 123 18 12300 123 30 12800 Febniary. OMwa HsicEt FMt. (Ml 8-33 ISO 631 832 8. 30 8-4* «-47 820 810 343 543 «'35 f'34 8'» 827 828 821 828 62t 8.2« 621 824 8 23 823 823 823 S'2I 8' 18 Di*- ehuas at.At. Ill 73 111 II 111 75 112 II 132.00 131 75 13181 I1M7 12800 128 73 11882 11838 128' 83 129 75 12*' 13 12800 128' 13 l2*'ao 128' 13 138 75 I18'25 12850 128-37 128-83 12837 128 37 128 12 12773 Much. Gmicb Heic&t Feet. Di>- eharte April. 8eo..ft. 12783 I27'30 127-23 IMSO 128-75 128 83 138-13 12588 128-00 127- 75 128-81 131-83 131 73 131-83 131-73 132 13 130-13 130-25 130-13 3* 130-37 501 I3I>'3S 130-30 13037 130-50 130-30 130-87 131-13 130-87 130-87 131-13 11325 Feet. 5-00 501 487 4-W 4-08 4-a3 5-00 5-08 5-01 501 5-03 5-02 504 5-03 5-04 5-08 5-03 5-05 5-00 5-01 5-.18 505 5-04 5-08 5- 10 5-n 5-08 5-08 5-0* 5 12 M*y. Gun Die- Guae Die- HeicEt. ehuge Hei(ht ehaite 8ee.-ft. 120-00 124-80 112-80 115-20 115-20 108-00 130-00 l»-20 122-40 122-40 127 20 124-80 129-8 127-20 12*10 134-40 127-20 132-00 120-00 123 40 134-40 133-00 I28-80 134-40 144'On 148-80 141-80 134-40 141 80 14*10 Feet. 8ec.-rt. 5-14 5-15 5-15 5-18 5 17 5-1* 531 5-4(1 5-58 5-00 54* 5-48 584 588 835 8 71 8-3* 8-42 8-45 8-32 424 8-15 820 8-25 8-30 8-54 8-75 887 8-80 8-55 852 154-40 I57-0O 157-00 15**0 182 20 187-40 173-00 230-00 292-80 120-00 280-80 257-20 314-40 I 455-20 842-00 842-00 847-10 870-20 8M-00 828 40 584-80 538-00 384-00 5*0-00 818-00 748-40 888 00 819-20 780-00 ;52>00 735-30 June. Gei«e I Die- Hei(ht : cheife. Feet. .s«!.Jt. 8-32 8-22 8-17 6 14 8-08 6-10 8-0* 6' IN 6-47 8-58 626-40 374-40 548-40 532-80 902-40 478-40 507-20 553-80 7117-20 7.M-60 8-62 791-20 8-76 872-00 6-9* 101-00 7 10 1,1180-00 7*7 11,740-00 »-2l *'35 «>I5 2.877 20 3,008-00 2,822-00 9-12 2,794-40 *-04 12,720-80 i 8-78 i2, 481-80 8-73 '2,415-80 8-54 12,260-80 8-48 2,205-80 8-44 j2. 188-80 8-40 2.1,12'M) N-»l !'2, 048-00 HIS ,1,920-00 8-01 ;i,iioo-flo 8'7H '2,530-00 BOW RirES POWER ASD STORAQE 235 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Kananaskia River, near Kanana8ki^<, for 1912.— Concluded. D*T. July. Owaait Dm- Height . charae AiKwI. Gauce Di*- Heicht. charge September. Gauae H^gK rl rharge Gauge Height Die- charge November. Gaiupe Die- Height, charge Deeemfaer. Gatue Height. charge. I 2 1 4. I. • 7. 8 « in II. 13. 13 14. IS 1« 17 18 l» 30 31 13 33 34. 35 N 37 38 3* 30 31 Feet. 7 «3 7'U • 52 7-43 7M 74« 7-72 8(3 8 M 8'«() 8 W 8-70 • 12 8-82 8'M 7'8« 7 M 7 U • U •'24 7 32 733 7 M 7-78 7-71 7 M 740 7 31 732 Hec.-ll. *1,488 I.4M 3.310 i.sao 1.330 1.408 1,808 3.i20 2.832 *2.888 3.880 2.4M 2.sm 2,810 2,814 2.311 2.320 1,744 l,S2.t 1.903 3.2S8 3. Mil 1.331 1.488 1.728 1.880 1.824 1.4(8 1.3«2 1.327 Feet. Sec.-ft. 1.248 1.228 1.202 1,213 1.277 1.228 1.18* 1.137 1.105 1.052 1.150 '. 1.137 1.085 1.014 1.033 1.052 I 1.202 1.334 I.3M 1.277 1.248 1.235 1.215 1.348 1.583 i.aaii 3.115 ' :i.222 3.0(3 I 1.1(5 I Feet. 865 8-51 834 • 27 8U 8-38 *■» 830 8-32 • '30 • '32 8'35 840 •'38 •'33 • '31 • 2^ «'1( 8 1( • 08 800 9 «K 8 01 807 812 8 03 5'M 9-77 5'73 5'7D .282 ! 8 83 ' 1.972 I 8ec.-(t. 8(8 818 722 884 728 734 I MH I 700 ! 711 : 700 711 72ti ; 798 i 749 I 717 j 708 i •7* •43 843 : 988 ; .148 t 538 I 553 '. 583 tm ' wu 47^ 4I8 435 434 ^ Feet. «0 5R •I 97 Wl •2 1 S| 93 «l 97 ! 95 ! 9« I 54 4( 48 i» ate.At. 414 402 3(3 403 411 3(8 3(2 38( 3(5 384 3(2 3(8 384 381 372 375 388 384 378 381 375 3«2 35( 354 352 390 345 390 390 335 Feet. Hec-h 528 5 » S3« 5-37 5'34 5'33 5'33 531 5'33 I 5 32 i 5'2n ' 9-23 9'21 9'1( 9'18 5'0( 9' 10 9' 17 9'1« 5' 13 913 5' 10 9'm 9' II 9'0« 909 ! 5 10 908 9'30 910 311 3a( 314 302 3(4 tM 2(7 3(3 29* iM 2«l 284 270 272 28« 3X4 358 244 218 i.n 183 15« 144 144 130 i 13^ 193 Feet. 9'33 9'41 9(0 9(4 •'30 • '31 I 5'71 5'«4 I • '(• I 5'4( i I 9'28 530 5'42 5'«« t5'70 9(1 5'«a I 5'8^ ' 5'84 ' 9'Wi ; 9(3 ' 9'«ll : • m ' 5'(l , W'flo ' • '•4 • 'X> 8 52 • '75 •'•• 7' 10 See.-(t. 148 17* 3*8 tM 440 438 304 17« 372 130 72 72 88 13* |48 208 1(2 irr Di«th jHaii!:.'v — Kebruary . . . Marrh April .. VTay .. June July .\Hg1lll1 Kepiemhar. < Ietc4ief .Vovemher Deeember Thf yau . Per lalaehee Total ' Maximum. MiBimuiit Mctin Si|Ua.t. Mil.. (Ml 1.1 l>niiaage Arn'-lerl I«l 31 .\rr« 133 138 0-38 1.311 113 118 I3« II 32 II 34 7.40( 132 113 I2( 32 II 37 7.W« I4( 108 128 (1 32 II M T.aa5 888 laii 477 1 IT 1 ;m m.M» 3.ni8 4711 I..VI2 3 «l 4 :t9 W.I3I1 3.3i8 1.282 I.HMI 4 HI .) 88 122.-28 3.222 1.014 1.424 :i .M 4 119 i>?,96i< tm 414 8M 1 111 1 Wl 38.BM 414 314 178 11 mn 1 l>7 M.IW »I4 I2l> iM 11 821 II 88 14. ((5 440 lai n .Vl2 0-98 12.843 21 m 4U,M5 236 DBPARTMEXT OF THE IXTESiOR 5 GEORQE v., A. 1915 Discharge Measurements of Bow River, near Morley, in 1910. Dsto. Hydracimpber. Width. Amof ■cetioB. Mmu velocity. Omntt b«cht. Diwharfe. May M J. C. Keith Fwt. »2'7 333-7 217-7 307-4 Sq. (t. 1.488S* 1,810-50 1, 422-58 Ft. per Me. 844 7-4« S-M FaM. 4-90 5-55 4-74 3-80 3-37 3-38 2 38 3-30 1 83 1-22 8M.-tt. t.443-54 l2,0«6-«7 8,47801 5,990-30 3,047-88 2,987-93 2.989-38 •t 767-88 JUM 31 £ July 14 do Au«. » do 1 nr-n ! 4.m Aim. 30 £ 181-3 a33-94 3.2« m-l •28-86 322 181-2 n«.8« 3-23 17S-S 7M-30 ! 2-2« lU-5 73335 1 1 «l IM'O i«!l-8i i i.ia •8«>t.2l do tSM.2l do OcTn H. R. CanMliM Nov. 4 do 1 829-87 Nov. 30 Dn. » do do lil77-06 * Dm miat method lucd. t Two poiat method uaed. Daily GAV&i: Huoht and Dmchasge of Bow River, new & orley, for 1910 July August. { Gauce Di»- ;Hw.-ft. ' Faar. i 8ee.-tt 9 ...,,! '..]'.'......'.'.'.'.'"[[' 10 u 12 13 M i 15 18 17 18 19 • 2« . 21 a » 34 4-8 ' 8,110 ' M.. 8 5 It 4 H 4 4 4-3 4 10.340 ' 10.440 9.070 7.660 7.080 6,M0 4M 4-4 441': P-»- 4-0 4-46 4-.M 44 44 4li .^-85 S-7 5-2 : 5-05 ' iU 9 5 5-8 535 535 5 7 84 50 4 65 4 45 4-7 5 5 2S .^ 2,1 JO 6»M 7,M» 7.l» •.lit 6,W» 7,8I* *t.t75 7,tl» 7,lt» W.OJfl 13,475 I2,H» 10.840 ; lO.OtO ! 11,245 11.860 i 13.090 i 11.245 11.243 12.680 II.41U 1.840 8.525 7.H30 H.;i»i U.MO 10. MO lU.MO 9.»40 4-88 *•« •>St DMt 3-48 1 tjm 3-4 1 8JK) 3 3 8,175 3-2.1 8.Mn 3-55 •4 8.IW 4-n V* 7,gM l-O.! 4-* ».a8o 1-11 44» 8.175 3-M *-m T.MI) 3-85 4-48 7. MO 3-75 4 M )•. 175 3-7S 4-7 K.7U0 3-7 485 9.255 3 65 48S 9,»5 3-6 ! 4 95 •.MR 3 5 4-H 9.070 3-33 4-9 9,440 3 25 4 75 8,8U 3 2 4 55 8,175 3 1 4 IS 4 4 4 3 4 2 i-t 3 99 3-8 3 7 3 8 3 77 3-8 ;.830 ;.66U 7,340 7,0U 8,240 8.370 5.990 9.7«n 5,'W 5.921 5,990 31 3 IU 3 n 2 96 ■.' 75 2 89 2'99 2 .19 3 U 2 38 5,IM 5,070 4,810 4,740 5.415 8.500 H.63S 6,100 6,115 6,115 .I.8T5 .'>.875 5,710 S,M5 5,530 5,300 4, 9611 4,740 4.6111 4,410 4..1 3,*l.-. 3.30.i 3.11^ 2.98li 2,95J BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAQE 2Sr SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Dischaboe of Bow River, near Morley, for 1910.— Continued. D«T. n.. ».. a.. ».. a.. N.. n . ».. n.. n.. Saptcmbsr. October. November. December. Qaiue I Du- I Geofe Ueicht.i oh«ne.|H«i|ht Die- I Gmmeb Die- Geace Di*. ehani IBeight.' chaiie.lHeicht. eheiae. Feet. I Sec.-ft. Feel. Sec.-ft. : Feet, i 8eo.-«t. i Feet, i 8ec.-B. 1. 2., a.. 4.. S «.. r.. 8.. 9 . W . U.. II.. n.. M.. u.. 17.. I«.. » . 2-33 : 2-28 : 2' IS ; 2-27 2'3S ' 2« 2 5 2-43 . 2'2S 22 2-23 2- 13 212 2(>7 I 207 ' 21 2 23 2'2i ; 2-3 ! 2'3J ■ 2-3.1 2-4 244 2-33 2 4 2-37 2 25 tin ■ill ; 2-M . 2.(01 2.8IS 2.M8 2,7»g 2,a35 3.IIS 3,210 3,077 2,7M 2,ll»0 2.731 2.M8 2.M2 2.473 2,175 2.520 2,731 2,765 2,M0 2,»35 2,901 3,020 3.0tM 2,901 3,020 2, 9*9 2.765 i.teo 2.SM 2,M0 21 208 20 20 1-95 1-9 I'O 2115 2-2 2-3 2-35 2-25 2 27 2 15 2 15 2 3 2-38 . 2-32 2 24 2-2 2- 15 2 1 204 205 2 193 ' IM i 1-8 I 1-75 > 2.520 ! 2,490 i 2,370 2.370 2.295 2.220 2,. 170 2,521) 2 445 2,6Nn 2. Mil 2,935 2,765 2.799 2,6011 2, (100 2, 85(1 2.((W 2.884 2,748 2.680 2,61X1 2,520 : 2,430 ; 2,443 2.370 2.2«5 ; 2. 16(1 ; 2.070 ! 2.090 i l«7 1-7 j I U < l:Li I (M 16 15 1 53 1 55 ! 1 ,W 1 5:< 1-45 >'S , 1-45 I 1,8M l,9«0 l,8«0 1.930 1.846 1,X74 1,7911 1, 660 1,«9R 1,725 I.6IIK 1. 6911 1.595 l.6«!> *l,595 14 . 'i.san 1-34 I '1.440 i'2S ! '1,320 1-37 I '1.470 1-37 '1.4(10 1'3« 1 M 1 34 1-45 10 10 10 103 MS 1-23 'l.44n •1.390 •1,4(10 •I.SJn • 970 ' 9«0 • »an • mo •i.wo •1,190 I 73 j 1,171 , 11 1-4 1-47 1 49 1-55 1'4« 1 45 I 53 IS 1-25 1-45 i'4 1 25 1-23 ; 1-27 1-3 1-2 12 1 19 1 15 1-25 1 25 13 ; 1-47 16 1-55 1-7 2'3S ; 1-U I 'I.UO •I, MO *l.8« •I. 210 •1.4S0 '1,440 ♦I.JIO •1.380 1.380 •1.440 •1,1M •1,2» •i,oao •I,(«0 •1,010 •i.un 8(0 840 870 970 • Chamiiif coadiliiXK due lu ice: Nuv. 15th tu Dw. 3let, Monthly Dukharue of Bow Kivpr, near Morley, for 1910, DreiiHsr uea, 2. ON iqiiare mile*. Month . Iky (2^-31) Jne lirfjr October >igTemfaer Mewwber The pertntl 25k 17 i 1 I DarajiMii m 80roHp-9%Sf, 1 Rtro-Otr. i Rapth Pot m iflf h(« Total Mitiiniuin .Minimum MWM ••luare • m ■ute. Dtauece MM. ■ere-lee« 10 440 6. urn «,47J« 4 08 l'(H 117 KK i:(.ii«() 6 IIS 9 .M3 8 4 54 5'(l« S<7,ltM 9. 640 'i.lm 7,«« 7 1 3 74 4 31 483.211 6.A35 •.»»2 4.Gn • ' 2 »l 2 «t ]«7.(lfl S 210 2 460 2,T»a >i 1 33 1 48 IM,244 2.9H 1,972 2.509 9 1 JO 1 38 154,314 1.9*0 «tt l,SU« 73 ■80 (O.SM 68. »7 !,,M0 770 i.iin 6 53 «l 1 l.«U,88l 238 DEPARTMENT OF THE IHTVRIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1t15 DwcBARQE Measuremknts of Bow River near Morley, Alts., in 1911. Date. Itm. ai Fab. 10 Uh. S Mur. SI Apr. i Aft. U tUy ( Mity M iwm 14 ioly 12 Am- H 8a*t. » Oat. M Nov. 17 Nov. tr Dae 14 Hyd i a tra pl i a t . H. R. CaimUka do do do H. C. Ritchie H. C. Ritchie . . . do B.RaMll do do H, Brown do V. A. Newhall... do do do Width Feat. 141 W 114 114 107 Itt.i 17t IM.l Ml.t 217 1 tM.4 IN 1744 174. < 177 « 1871 Area of Buetioe. 8q.It. JM.l Ml MS 4120 401. « Ml I mi Hit 1,741 I.3SD 1.200 912.1 M4.1 •IS.S 912.1 Ml 1 Haas Oaua Vaioeity. ' Hai^t. Diaoban*. Ft. 2.01 2.12 l.M 1.77 l.M 1 41 211 2.74 7.07 1 71 4.94 2.91 2.11 t.U It 1.30 Feet. 2.83 2.91 2.11 211 0.80 0.19 l.U 2.04 608 4.42 3 M 2 21 in 3 50 3 24 J 74 Sae..il. 17S.0t 171. It llS.ti 730.li 731.r 941.1 2,190 2,177 12,171 7,n2 5,930 2.741 i.ni 1,174 • 1072* 1.091" t Straam (roaea over, coaditioae bad, reiulu approiimate. X 8traam fraaaa over. ? Stnam partly (roaea over, reaulti may be ilithtly iaaccurate. II May be siight error due to iaaeeuracv of eouadias*. * Laiiie amovttt ot slosh tee, reaalta only approiimate. "Larte amoaat ol ilinh ice. Compared with the reoordsat Banff and CalKury thediicharieappeiirstobetno hxh. Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow River near Morley, Alta., for 1911. January. DST. Gaw I Di» Height ! eharie. Heigl February. March. Oaaae H^t Mi) .WO im .VM .tIS ■VM hm m »«2 I Die- I Gawe { Dia- eharie. • Height . '. charge. Feet. 2-75 2-75 210 2 75 2-85 2'U 2-90 2-85 2-90 2'K) 2-95 j.ni 2 w 2-9(1 2 15 8« -It ; 590 . 581 •10 1 582 190 in , 112 111) I «4« ' M2 : n2 :m , 872 M2 OH FeM. i Hee-ft. 2-85 i 114 •14 114 S«4 588 Gauge t Die- Gauge I Die- [ Gauge Die- Height charge. Height i charge. Height charge 2-75 1 280 2 75 2. 85 2-80 i 2-80 3 70 i 3 15 2 «a 2-10 3-55 April. May. June. Feet. ; Hec.-(l 0-74 i 0-70 i 0-70 1 0-70 I 0-71 i 5«4 • 14 588 588 5M .VI3 I 410 I 580 57« I •52 0-88 < 0-15 0-18 075 I 0-72 0-70 n «5 •1) M 0-«5 0-70 808 •74 708 718 •M, 774 755 340 755 79U Feet. I-IO I 27 I 31 I 40 110 1 90 I 80 1-80 1-82 l-lo 1 75 1-80 1 85 I'M 1 75 Bee -ft. 1.240 i 1.317 1,421 I 1.470 i 1,720 i I 2,110 I 2,010 I 2.010 ' 2,040 ! 2.010 1.995 2,010 2,085 i 2,010 I 1.935 Feet. 3-35 4-40 4-10 4-90 t4<12 4-35 4-05 3-95 3-85 3-90 4-40 . 5- 15 5-80 I • 10 «'20 Sec -ft . 5,040 7,700 8,740 9,000 8.272 7,570 •,790 •,530 «.275 «.400 7.700 9.590 11,550 12.410 12.770 2-75 M* 2-10 •48 0-<8 77« 1 95 2,240 • 15 12. 8I.-. 2 811 iVi 2 10 •72 0-70 7»0 2-10 2,480 8 I» 12,4«'P l-HA 2-75 .M4 2 ,M 74« 0-80 870 2 27 2.7.W 4 85 11.115 2 8.5 nil 2 511 790 •0-3.5 34<) 2 2« 2,742 5 75 11.40) i.N5 814 2 47 8.M ft. 91) tUft 2 .17 2.943 ».2(l 12,77ft 2 k:i IH 2-30 814 12? 1.282 2 27 2.759 8 35 U.235 KM 814 215 812 o.»8 : 1.022 2 17 2,592 • 45 13,545 2 80 588 2 15 878 tl o« lino 2 10 3.4lift 8 ()5 I3..1ft.f 28* •14 2-07 904 1 IS 1 1,190 2 05 2. 40ft .M5 11.115 ■i mi ,W8 1-05 920 lift ■' 1,14ft 1 95 a. •241) .^<«n ;ft.970 ft 85 7«« 1 17 1,210 1 98 2. 28" .V.M in, 83.1 010 732 1 12 t.lio 3 01 2.416 ,'>-45 10,825 7« 708 2 an 3,400 BOW RIYEIt HOWKR AND 8T0RA0E 239 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow River near Morley, Alta., for 1911. — Continued. Dunn Juuarv. Kithniarv. March sad November. Daily diMhariF tor thme nioatlu an oaly aniroiimale. tNoohnerviitiim, xauce height int4>rpotate Mu.NrH. January 121-311 I'obnwry Man-h.. .\pril May juae -. . Jul.v Auituat UiHiiitaoa t.'4 8B(unu -Km >eptenil>er .,,,,. ' ►clober \ovenil»er tl-H 27-101 The period I Maxiitiuiii Minintutii. tari 7(M Ml l,3«2 .l.W) l],M.t 10,82,1 7,4*1 i. It I i.tn x.tu h\i SM ,Mil ,140 l..>l(l A. 1)11 4,U7« I,24915 Discharge Measurements of Bow River near Kananaskis, in 1912. D.... HydroctBpher. Width. Aim odectkn. Man Velocity. HdSt- DiKhane. •F«b. 2» V. A. Newhall .... Feet. 270-00 288-00 273 00 338-00 148-50 348-00 387-00 408-00 402 00 422-00 418-00 412-00 4085 408-00 lW-00 MT-OO 181 00 371-00 IM-00 371-00 SMOO 18000 Hq.ft. 302-25 387-00 244-95 271-25 287-M 300-50 423 70 781-55 731 00 1,042-88 1.033 89 888 40 827-48 880-20 888-W 808-00 55«-no 488-00 412-00 411-7 900-00 919-4 Ft. per lec. 1-84 2-174 2-37 308 3- 14 3-37 3-39 978 991 7-39 7-34 847 8-31 8-81 541 4<98 387 341 3-91 3-23 2-82 1-57 F»t. Sec.-Jt. 987-18 •Mm. 10 •Uir. 20 H.C. Ritchie do 2-00 1-97 184 1-83 1-85 2 23 3-03 2-»4 1-70 3-70 1-80 1 30 3-80 2-87 254 2-90 2-40 2-22 2-23 3 18 4-32 980 -4iS 999-30 •April 2 do do 987-99 April It 917-22 April 2« do 881-88 May 13 do . . 1,388-39 May 38 . ... do 4,528-81 June 11 do 4,027-07 Jaw 25 do do do 7,872-14 Jaly 9 7,691-82 JlUy 35 9,403-38 Aug. 8 do 5,139-39 A«f. 20 do 8,477-10 Sept. 8 do 3,780-00 Sept. 24 H. R.Ctmm 2,784-00 Oct. 8 do , . 3 307-00 Oct. 23 ... H.C. Ritchie 1,8(3-00 Nov. 8 -to 1 4i8-00 •Nov. 1» do 1,388-70 •Dee. 3 do 1,312-40 •Dec. 17 do 871-00 *ln ooaditiooe. Non.— Tliiu station eetablijihed ia 1912 to r,iplaoe the station at Morley. Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow River, near Kananaskis, for 1912. DaT. U . tt.. U.. 14.. U.. M.. 17.. 18. . » . 10.. H.. 11.. U.. M., n.. M 17.. v.. ».. ».. 11.. March. HeicI 8( 1 81 ' Hae.-rt. 978 9n 890 889 890 835 j 809 I (35 (39 (80 710 i (80 I (95 ; (SO ' 9(6 (80 9(0 : 6(0 64( (09 5iin (05 810 806 6(0 Feet. 1-87 1 85 1-88 1 87 1 88 1 87 1-88 1-93 2-09 2-08 3-10 3-15 2-33 3-38 3 54 2-88 I 2'89 I 2-M I 2'U 2 (3 , 3-90 I 2-49 j 2-4( 2'43 ' 2 (1 Dia- ebarga. Gaue Dia- Hcicht. charge. (20 2-7« 1 (36 2-118 : (3U : 3-03 (39 3 00 639 i 2 (8 2-70 1 Hec.-rt. 8(9 (39 (80 (96 Feet. 885 886 784 1.097 1,074 1.120 1,265 1,474 1,9(2 2,4(4 3,700 3,820 3,700 .1,8(0 2,794 2,320 2,287 2,188 2.089 3,718 3.420 3,780 4,389 4.280 4,180 3,080 Sec -ft 2.428 2,368 2,320 2,221 2,169 2,023 1,8M 2,392 3,100 4,im 4,180 4,4.12 4,918 8,927 7,131 7.794 8,100 7,794 7,846 7,743 7.898 7M-2 7.233 7,284 7,690 7,.1»i( 7.1S2 7,284 7336 5.(19 lfc= BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAOE 241 SESSIONAL PAPER No, 25« Daily Gauge Heioht and Dibcharoe of Bow River, near Kananaskis, for 1912— Concluded. September. November. December. ; UwiKe I)i((- I Gause Dis- Gause I Hevht I choree Heisht . charce Height 1 .... Ftet 336 317 3'IH) 3. OR 304 305 3 42 3 M 3-70 3-72 3 N 3«7 3 74 384 3M 3«2 3S4 343 3-48 3-37 3 31 306 3-13 2 3 4 5 « 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 1* 20 21 22 33 . 14 3-37 23 3(4 3« 3-72 27 28 n 30 31 3-37 323 3' 18 3 19 3-l« Dia- j GauM charge I Ueicbt. Dia- cbarie Gsuae Dia- I Gauge f Dia- 8ec.-rt. Feet. Sec.-(t i F«M. ' See.-h. Feet. 8ec.-U. Feet. 5.410 5,(J05 4,647 4,518 4,432 4,475 6,162 6,876 7,590 7,692 7.539 7,437 7,704 8,308 7,386 8.637 4.518 4,780 : 3.919 7,284 7,692 5.919 5,365 5,050 5,095 4,960 3 !» 3 21 3 19 :i.22 3 25 ■iiit :M6 3. 11 ; 307 3 15 30» , 305 IIUO 2. 96 2 97 7,182 2-99 6,774 3-27 6,213 3. 52 6,468 3. 61 5,919 3 60 3-67 3. 63 360 3 69 3-77 3. 71 3.73 3. 70 3. 69 3-65 3,050 i 5.185 5,095 I 5.2311 I 5,36.5 5,140 4, MO 4,735 4,561 4.915 4,647 4.475 4,260 4.100 4,140 4.221) 5,4,M 6,72 7,131 7,080 7.437 7,233 7.080 7,539 7.947 ■ 7.641 7.74:1 7.590 7,539 7,335 3-41 6,111 3. 08 ' 3 01 2.»7 ': 3.95 299 289 2'MI ■im I 4,604 I 4,303 ! 4.140 I 4.060 ' 4,220 3,820 ' 3,4611 3,4ej 2-79 2. 81 3.42>l 3. 500 3 06 , 307 4.518 • 4.561 3. 04 2. 74 2. 71 2-73 2-69 2. 672 2-63 I 2-60 ■ 2-58 2. 56 ' 2. 53 2. .58 2-60 4.4)2 3,220 I 3,100 3.180 '• 3.022 2.946 2,794 2.680 2,608 2.536 2,428 j 2.608 j 2,680 ? 57 2,672 : •iS» 2,644 1 2-57 ' 2,572 1 2.53 i 2.428 i 2. 90 1 2,320 i 2-54 ' 252 ! 2. 50 I 249 2. 53 ! 2 .50 2-52 2 53 2 52 2 49 247 245 I 2.44 2. 45 2-43 I 2.44 I 24S 2 4A 2.47 I 2. 45 ' 2 43 ] 2.42 ; 2 45 ! 2-43 2-32 ' 2 39 ' 2. 39 2 35 2 32 2 38 2 40 1,990 e.-ft. Feet. 2.4< 2.392 2.320 2,287 2-428 2..i2i1 2.392 2,428 2,392 2.2117 I 2.221 2.153 2,122 2.1.V5 ' 2,080 I 2,122 2.254 2.18.H 2,221 2,1.55 ' 2.089 2.056 2,155 2,089 1,734 ^O'x i 1,!U>.. ' 1.830 ! 1.734 1.916 I 1,958 2,221 1,991 1,76« 1,586 1,418 1,363 1,336 1.255 1.2S2 1.255 1.282 1.336 1,255 1,121) 872 •1.390 1,228 1,255 1,230 1.174 1,120 872 1,170 1,070 .WO 854 836 710 746 8ec.-(t. 710 74« 890 8M 800 635 490 420 3«0 300 324 300 420 300 3«0 430 710 890 1,130 1,390 1,130 1.130 890 710 5«0 560 560 590 ,5«0 633 533 *Ice ooaditiona Monthly Dit^^ hak(;k of Bow River near Kananaski.s, for 1912. ( Drainagr area, 1304 Mjuare milen. ) DiariiAaoi ■>- RlTOND FUT. RuN^Jrr Month MnTlnium i Minimum 1 Vein PrrSciuare Depth ia laches on Draiaac* Araa. Total ia Acre-ffat. MBiTh (UV3I( ., ,. ! 640 1 710 4..W9 8.I0O 8.308 .570 .546 ' 635 1.894 ^ 4.4.12 : 4.100 2. .120 1.714 7111 3011 .580 -.50 627 00 2.199.68 ' .5. 475. 13 «.i:io 5,9230 3.294 n 3,158 1,2.59 6.56 i 045 48 1 60 4 21) 4 70 4 .54 2 .53 I 65 II 966 n 503 037 0-54 1 0.5 4 48 5 42 .i 21 282 1 90 1 08 058 34,543 ^' :■:.:::;:;;■:. 37,331 135,340 .125,753 July 376,920 1 7.947 364.193 1 4,604 196.006 > irtoher November l->e«einber . ' 2.464 2.221 1.3*11 r ■ 133. 6«8 74.930 40, lU The perKKi 1 »*•" 1.717,919 242 DEPjLltTMEyT Of TBE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 191 B DiscHABOB Mbasurements of Ghoet River at Gillies' Ranch, Alta., in 1911. D«to. Jtm t My U Ak. U Sqtt. It Oct. » Nov. • Nor. n Dw. II Hydro(nph«r. Width. Ana of Swtioii. H. C. Ritohic . . R. T. SubnM. L. R. BraKtoa . do do do V. A. Nnrhall . do do FMt. HO (70 N'O •10 7D0 HO at 48-0 SI-0 Sq.ft. Ml itS'5 IM'4 int 149-4 124-4 MS 75-3 71« Valoeity. Ft.perne. 1<0 t<»7 3<7» S>a7 2'4t 2-n 2-94 Gaun. Hsitht. Diaehatit. FMt. 2M 1 M 1-72 1-30 •No,. . tOaafinc made near tho Atte of caut^. loe coaditiooa but the probuble error small. S«i.-ft. IID-P 306<« 457 « 758-0 401 I ao5-s 200-O 121 -at init Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Ghost River at Gillies' Ranch, Alta., for 1911. Oa«. Aociut. 'Ha!^. Faat. 2. 9. 4. 5 «. T. I t.. N . 12.. IJ. 14 . 11 !(.. 17.. It.. 1* . » 11.. 21.. ».. M.. ».. 17. ».. n.. at. IM 2-44 2-44 2-55 t.4« 117 2-St 2-» 2-M 1(7 245 2-17 1-21 2-10 lit Di>- charce Sse.-tt. 84« 748 748 845 754 tJ« 813 tsg 1118 758 5«1 544 581 531 September. October. November. Gaace Die- Gaune 1 Dia- Gauge Du- Beitht charte iHeisht; charge. Heiiht. charge. Feet. I Sec.-ft. ! Feet. 488 459 740 1235 87* 844 808 531 323 1-85 188 1-88 1-85 1-84 1-77 1-77 1-80 1-80 1-80 Sec.-ft. ; Feet. 355 3M) 350 355 351 324 324 335 335 335 I 44 1-44 1-48 I 52 1-45 1-44 I 45 1 34 1-25 1 21 Sec.-ft. 228 228 34(1 247 230 228 230 207 181 l«l 2-13 2-07 2-08 2-00 1-M 2-00 2-00 l-M 1-M l-M 1.93 1-94 i-gn 1-89 1-90 1-94 I 98 1-93 511 1 80 : 335 472 1-78 328 485 1-70 1 300 429 1 88 297 433 1 89 ' 297 429 429 401 401 391 391 398 377 373 377 .198 407 391 373 359 1-87 1-80 1-57 IM 1 56 I.S« 158 t-.M 1-56 1-56 1-56 1-45 1 44 I 44 1-44 1-45 290 269 261 :S5 258 258 158 2.'M 358 258 258 230 218 228 228 ; '■" i»i J 155 151 1 45 1-47 166 1-86 161 ■'! ■■■ i .... ' i.. 1 . '.. I NoT«_- On Not. 12. the nrerwae troieato the bottom of the gauteand the height of ivater rould no be read. A thaw oa Not. 14 oauaed the wa'er to OTerflow the ice and on Nov. 20 the gauge wa« carripd iiut by the ice which broke up. HatuCaetory arranaemenla retarding remuneration oould not be made and no obKrrati' tn were therafore reported after Nov. 21. Not sufficient data to compute daily diicharge from Nov. 14 to 20. BOW RIVER POWER A\D STORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Monthly Discharge of Ghost River at Gillies' Ranch, Alta., for 1911. (Dreiaage area, 367 aqnare milea.) 143 DnrHARUE IN 8>roND -Fekt. Ri-y-Owr. MOMH. t Maximum. Minimum. Mean. Dentil in Per iiquare ' inchen on miie. Drainuxe. area. Total in aere-feet. 1(17-81) Saptomber OMober Norember (1-11) Thaperiod 1.119 1,231 247 U3 3M 2» 1»1 773 909 2«l 219 3'10« 1'37« 0-997 1101 n-H 3M 23.«98 30,060 I7,M3 4,T7» ;9.7M Discharge Measuhe.ments of Gl.ost Hiver at Gillies' Ranch, in 1912. Date HyilroKrapher. Feb. ?S: Mar. Mar. Mar. lot Joly Jaly All. AjW. Sapt: Oat. Os». Nor. Nor. Dae. Dec. 2 II » 1 IS 23 17 I« 14 27 II M 3 22 4 2« ( H. R.Crum V. A. Nenhall do do do ll.C. Kilchie do do do do l 3-44 3 1.-. 6300 79 1M-(I 3-24 3-12 59S0 7K-.'i l-M-U 301 2-87 4660 77-0 I4«-(I 2-89 2-70 4170 ::mi i:k)-ii 2- IS 2 44 322-0 M (1 I.M 2 2 27 2-39 276" 7ll() 114 5 2 26 2-30 25'* -4 ,V)» 79-2 2-.i7 2-22 193 3- 911 3 SU-4 2-18 2 :io 1760t *> 1? 244 DEPARTMENT OF THE IVTERIOM 6 GEORGE v., A. 1916 Daily Gauge Hbiqht akd Discharge of Ghost River at Gillies' Ranch, for 1912. DAT. II; UB I. s. t. «.. ». 6.. 7., (.. t.. 10.. II . 11 . II . 14 . I>.. 14.. 17 . U.. I* . » il . ».. a.. M.. It.. ».. 17. . ».. ».. ».. 31 . Jaauary. Febraary. it. ehara*. B Faet. 3 U 3. 85 3.85 3. 85 3 85 3M 3. 81 3'ao 3-87 3-91 3M 3'8a 3 M 3M , 382 I 3.44 I 3-25 2 M ' 30* 315 it. ehane 8M.-(t. i4im* I43'a0t 142(10 142-00 142'OOt I3«'20 141-20 IU-20 14240 i 143 20 144 20 I 142 20 1438 144-00 137-40 ! I 13380 \ 130 00 124-00 I l2«-80 : 12800 FMt- l-«l l-5« 194 1 54 1 54 2-11 1-89 1-41 1 59 1-99 I 94 141 198 1-54 Gun Di(- Guie I Hit- Qmmt { _ „_ Hwgfit. ehaii*. H«(ht : cbarai. BaigEt. | ehuv Baiibt. ehvie 8w.-(t. 97-20 94-40 9440 94-40 94-10 107-20 102-80 97-20 94-85 94-70 »4.85 I 94-40 I 97-20 1 94-70 I 9440 ! >Urah. April. Iby Fot. 2-02 1-12 1-41 1-92 I 41 8m.-(«. Feet. 8ee.-lt. Dic Ganw 105 40 104-80 97-20 95-80 97-20 3-41 |«*9800 121 ! 99-70 2-9« 114-20 3-9! 135-20 Hi : 120-20 2-77 120-40 2-00 123-00 0-go ; 124-00 0-84 124-20 3-11 i 127-20 1-94 9440 1-84 10220 1-43 99-85 100 i 97-00 1-11 I 105-40 309 124-On 2 70 119-00 2-34 112-20 2-25 I 110-00 2- IS I 108-00 I 199 ^ 1-90 ' 1-80 1-74 1-74 104-00 103-00 101-00 99-80 100-20 2-03 ; 1-72 Ml 1-81 1-71 I 112! 1-91 I 1-41 i I -01 105-40 99-40 105-40 101 20 99-20 104. KO 95 115 97-20 j 112 10 i 2-74 ! 1 34 1-41 089 0-91 i 2-74 251 1-44 242 3-04 234 2-54 3-44 3-41 314 120 20 ! 94-40 , •5-94 I 124-90 ! 123-10 I 120-20 i 115-20 I 95-80 ! 113-40 i 124 20 i 112-20 115-80 I 134-20 ; 137-20 I 128-20 -75 I lOO-OO i 3-31 I 119-20 I 3-22 3-(» 3-01 I 281 J-54 1 1-94 1-84 1-90 2 14 1-84 1-44 1-51 1-20 I 10 1-10 1-05 100 1-00 95 0-89 129-40 I 134-90 125-20 ; 121 20 i 11420 94-40 I 102-20 I 103-00 104-20 94 40 I 99 70 95-45'i 120-OOt ISO-OOt 178-00 I 157-SOt' 137-00 { 13700 ' 114-90 I 91-50 Faet. [8ec..(t. I 1-55 I 342 50 1-40 j 30100 103 : 149 3n 1-40 t 301-00 2-00 I 54700 0-84 I 79-40 085 I 79-50 0-95 I 116-50 132 90 0-99 I 1-09 1-05 1-03 l-OO 1-00 -SO 197-90 197-.M 149 -3U 137-00 137-00 34200 'tre cooditiou Jaa. I to Apr. 12. tCauce heichts interpolatiMl Jan. 1 to .5 aad Apr. 13 U> K t.Shiftinit coaditiniiK Apr. 13 and 14. **Ciauge height ratted by ice jam. Dia- Feat. H« -ft. 1-04 I li? 40 104 153 40 0-94 114-50 1 30 I 244-00 il Oii ■ 114-90 1 95 2-39 ' 2-49 3-30 1-49 I 924 90 704 91) 747-90 «7O-0O 419-90 1 35 I 28090 1-40 i 301-00 1-45 \ 321-50 1-54 I 358-40 I 1-44 i 407-40 I 1-40 1-45 1-90 1-99 I S3 180 1 35 1-20 1-60 140 I 1-25 1-30 I 35 I-IO 1-00 38300 I 403-90 I 342-00 \ 378-90 350 20 44500 i 280-50 i 219-lin 312-00 301-00 I 23990 240-00 280-90 I 178-00 ! 137-00 ! 04 , 0-93 , 0-90 I 1-30 I 0-93 j 0-92 I 0-90 1-02 1-00 2-80 ; 3-30 4-01 2-85 1-80 1 94 1-45 1-02 I -01 1 02 1-02 1-02 I -01 1-01 1-30 1-30 112 ♦« I* lf» Of. »■ 2411 <» lOf ill 104-211 940(1 145-20 137 00 STS-OO 1080-00 1371-10 895-50 44500 530-40 421-50 145-30 141-10 145-20 145-20 145-20 141-10 141-10 319-00 240-00 0-99 I 132-90 \ IS-.T BOW RIVER POWER AXD STORAGE 246 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25* Daily Gaugk Height and Discharge of Ghost River at Gillies' Ranch, for 1012.— Concluded. DAT. J«ly. Auivit. September . Oetobw. Nov»mb«r. Dcrnnbrr. Gatin Uu- Uuin i Di*- Oancs i Di«- Gmatf I IHi- i Gmik | Dm- H«igEt. cbarn.|UBifGt ; chwie Haicbt. rhane Hsight. I cbane JHncJit.l charta |Hai|iht.| eharia F«t. : See -tt. Feet. Sec. .ft. t i 3 , 4.. » 8 9 111. 12.. 11 . 14.. 15 t< 17 18 . 18 . ao . 21.. 12. . a.. M 2S » r 28 2*. 10 2 U 120 t Ml 2.81) 286 180 420 480 4*0 4. 20 400 3-80 ! 380 3-7S i 370 I 3.90 ; 3. SO 3.2s I 3.3a ' 8-00 j 300 ': 300 3. 15 I 3.00 4.50 I I 3. 00 2 M 2. 70 2. 55 2. 45 2. 30 , 690 2ig 4«5 875 8W I.28S 1,449 ; 1,«»5 I l.«13 1.44« j 1.3«7 1,285 1,285 1,2»4 1.244 1.182 1,162 1,060 ' 1,080 i 967 I 957 957 1,019 i.367 1.572 957 9.17 834 773 ! 732 2. 45 2. 40 ; 2,10 ; 2 311 2 25 220 2- 1.5 2'IIS 2 US 200 2. 02 205 ■ 1 OS 1-90 I'SK 188 3. 35 2. 95 2-i. 2-60 j 2. 20 ' 2-20 2-00 2- 13 3(M) j 2 .VI 2 33 2. 511 2.35 2 M 232 I Feet. ,Sec.-ft. Feet. ! 8ec.-K. 1 Feat. . 8ec.-ll. Feet. Sec.-(t. 732 711 670 670 6.'r 691 2. IS I 2-10 I 2.10 2. 08 214 2- 15 208 2-28 2-30 2. 14 2. in 2. 05 204 2 m 195 49S 1 95 1,101 1 »4 527 190 691 188 793 184 629 1-84 629 195 547 1 95 6119 l'9'l 957 IWI I 86 1-85 1 83 1 76 1 85 609 588 .WH mn ' 604 608 580 662 670 604 588 MS UU .147 527 .127 .122 .1116 498 ; 481 : 481 , .127 .127 urn I SIM ' 490 486 I 477 I 449 ' 486 i .. . . 1 I 85 { 1-84 I 180 1 1-75 ! 74 1 65 170 176 174 I 74 1-73 1 70 170 1-70 1-70 1 66 I 68 1-66 I 65 1-65 I'Sn i I .15 j 1-56 146 1 54 ! I '50 I 144 144 I 144 I I 35 i 1 34 I 486 I 482 ! 465 i 445 : 441 I 404 I 424 445 ; 441 441 I 436 : 424 424 , 424 [ 424 I 408 '. 416 I 408 : 404 \ 404 { 342 ' 362 I 367 ! 326 I 358 I 342 ' 317 ' 317 I 317 281 277 1 3» I 1 44 j 1.49 I 1-39 I l'40 I 1.38 j 1 34 , 134 139 140 I I 4i I 145 ; 140 139 ! 130 ! I 34 1-40 , 1-30 140 1-35 1-32 130 130 i 130 120 I 14 . 1-25 1-30 1-35 135 297 317 338 297 301 276 , 276 i 297 301 322 322 301 297 260 276 3111 297 301 281 268 256 2.12 250 208 ISO 228 240 260 256 1 40 : 1 45 150 1'3S 1-22 1.25 122 . 1-22 1-22 I 22 1'2I 1 20 1-21 1-20 ISO 119 112 MO 1'3« 135 138 149 1 58 1 47 158 160 155 160 160 160 1-70 27S 2(4 311 24* IM IM 186 186 186 186 18* 186 18« 18« 186 186 180 17D 184 184 184 182 180 182 180 178 181 178 178 178 17t 'Shittiac oooditioo^ Nov. 21 t" Dae. 5. tiee cvnditiun.H Dec. 5 to Dec. 31. Monthly Discharge of Ghost River at (Jillies' Ranch, for 1912. f Draiaafe area, 367 equare mil«t. ) DwHAHoi m SiTONO-Ftvr. RcN-Or». Jaauary . . . Febraary. Mareb April Miy J««» July Aifuat . Baptamber.. October November. . December. The year... [ Maximum. I4t 112 137 .142 T48 .371 .6*5 .101 670 486 294 100 96 96 76 1.13 219 498 449 277 180 176 Mrai . Per Square Mile. Depth in ' inrheaon i Total la Drainage. ! .\cre-fept. Area. I 128 035 040 7.841 99 0-27 029 ,1.721 IIS 0-32 37 :.088 134 036 0.40 7. 950 358 0-98 1 13 22.006 300 82 092 17,826 1,073 2-92 337 65,976 653 1.78 205 40151 .145 148 16.1 ! 32,430 395 1 07 1-23 j 24,288 278 0757 0845 16,542 I9« 0534 0611 ' 12,062 13 270 259-880 *««e»ocopr moiuTioN tut chart (ANSI ond ISO TEST CHAUT No. J) A leSJ Coil Mom Sir,.! ' ("•) 2M - MM - r« 846 DEPARTMBNT OF THE ISTERIOK S GEORGE v., A. 191S DiscBARQE Measurements of Jumpmgpound Creek near Jumping Pound Alta., in 1906-8-9. D«t.. Hydrofnplw. Width. An* of netioa. Meu Taiodty. ssss. Duchut*. itot. JlUMlS 1. F. HamiltoB F«t. 103 Sq.ft. 28« Ft. perMC. O'M Fact. 2-70 2-75 230 230 236 205 its 214 IM a«.4t. 1«2 IM Jmelf do Umyt P. M. Snider ».3 4t.4 570 «t'0 tS'O 870 28.. 290 «t 74 187 212 IK 14 022 088 OM 017 OH 0-31 0-70 nmrt' U Wyri* H. R. Cvarailan .Si!ptoffiber4 do ',,.'. 32 113 IWt. Ji«nb«7' do M M * Meawtementi takea >t wadinc aaetiou. Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Jumpingpound Creek near Jumning Pound, Alta., for 1908. Dav. ! April. 1 ■>y. Jaw. ' Qwni Di»- HaiiEt.|oliwn iM^ chute Ht!|^. Di*. ehMI*. 1 2 3 F«H. SK.-ft. FMt. 140 I'lO IM I'M I'M I'M IM IM IM in I'M I'M 1-70 IM IM IS tie |:S I'M I'M I'M 3' 10 110 I'M IM rs 3-» t'TO SM.'ft. FMt. 500 5'M 4'70 too t M 5(10 4-70 400 3«0 3 W 3 M 3 SO 3 40 3-40 3'M I'M I'M 3'M 3' 10 1 M 3M 3'M I'M 1 10 too too I'M I'M too 306 SM.4t. 751 8M 4 i » : ::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::| ? 673 751 8M Ttl i:i:i:::-;:;;^:;:i:i;;;:::^::;:;::;;::;:::;::i;:;;:;::::;;;;;^^ •73 4»l 4W 11 '■...:;:■;;■: j S::::::::::::::;;:.::::::::::::::;;;'r-:'----::--::--::::--^^ ::::;::: M7 Ml Ml M IT It :::::::: "a-io' «a 140 1-40 lit t» IM I'M iS i« t'4« ::::::: 3M 3M 311 311 »« Mt Ml M 311 til Ml at m m Ieeee E--iEE:i 11 at 111 at IH at BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAOE Mt SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Dihcharge of Jumpingpound Creek, near Jumping Pound Alta., for IQOS.—Continited. July. AuKust. September. October. 1 . 1 *.. 4.. (. •.. .r. 8 . ».. M It. a. It. H.. U M.. n. H.. M.. a.. n.. Gmise I Ois- GMite ; Dis- j Gauge DU- ' Ciauce IHeight charts. I Heicht. chariie ^Heiiht. chatse Height ; charge. Feet. 8ec.-rt. 162 139 139 139 139 117 117 I 117 > 90 9« 90 9« 2-60 I 2-70 i 260 290 I 2-60 { 2M ' 2-60 2-50 2S0 2S0 i 2-40 ' 2-40 2-4(1 . 2 40 i 2-40 2 Sn 117 2W 117 2-40 9« 2'4fl 9« i 2-40 9« 2' 10 2-40 2-30 2-30 ' 2 30 2 2fl 2-20 2-20 , 2-20 230 . Fert. I Sec.-Jt. i Feet. ' Sec.-(t. ! Feet. ! Sec ft. 2'2fl 2-20 2-20 2-20 ' 2-10 I 2-10 ! 2' 10 : 2- 10 2- 10 2' 10 2 20 2-30 2-30 2-20 2-20 I 2-20 ' 2-30 2- 10 , 2' 10 ! 2' 10 : 90 2.10 i m 200 7« 201) 7« 1 2' 10 > 79 1 2-20 »7 2.20 »7 2-20' .17 2-20 57 2. in 57 2» 87 J 57 57 ! «! 40 40 ; 40 40 I 57 57 40 • 40 ; 40 40 '. 27 27 40 57 2. 20 2' 10 2' 10 i 2-10 I 200 ' 200 200 2i!0 2.C'!> 200 200 { 190 190 1-90 57 j 40 { 40 , 40 27 I 27 i 27 27 : 27 ' 27 i 27 ; 2t» 20 20 20 190 20 1-90 20 ; 1-90 20 IW) 20 200 27 57 2- 10 j 40 57 2' 10 ' 40 57 2- 10 40 411 2-00 27 57 2-00 ; 27 tl 2-20 i 200 210 2. 10 2. 10 2- 10 2' 10 2- 10 2. 10 2' 10 2 10 57 200 2' , J 10 7a 2-l.i 2-S5 2 91 2-70 2-6.5 2-95 2-95 2-99 65-8 52 .52 346 246 223 .'!II6 3(W 3S7 2-24 .1.111 3-2.5 3-011 2-7S 2-75 2 6.5 2 .56 2-45 2 39 235 7.) 4 .V4H ,522 392 283 269 : 223 i 1N4 141 120 I 106 ; 2-70 2-70 2-6.5 2-60 2-73 2-73 2-70 2-BK 2-62 2-6') l-,i» .'46 246 223 201 2611 260 246 237 21ll 201 IU3 2 -.18 2-40 2-46 2-48 249 251) 2-50 2-52 2-49 2-47 116 123 145 152 136 260 160 168 1.56 •49 '.'.'.'.'.'/' M S:.::. ...... M. 10 , . ai I fi l\ t\o ub 1. I 252 DEPARTMEyr OF THE IVTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Monthly Discharge of Jumpingpound Creek near Jumping Pound, for 1911. (Dniuce are*. 187 iqumra milw.) Montr. DncBABoi IN Skono-Fcct. RfNOrr. May June July August September October (1-19) The period j.qj 3*2 308 127 0879 0/8 MS UO 218 M$5 1 29 MS 73-4 205 1098 1-28 1,300 1080 357 1-909 1-20 3M 10»'0 184 0-984 MO IM 70-8 US 815 0-43 Per Muare miCB. Depth in inchee on Total in Drainage acre-foet. 7.809 12.853 12.805 21.951 10,949 4,334 70.501 Discharge Measurements of Jumpingpound Creek at Jumnmg Pound, Alta., in 1912. Hydrographer. April Sifay M"- Jun June .uly July Aug. Aug. Sept. Sept. Oct. Oct. Nor. H. 0. Ritchie. do do do do do do do do H. R. Cram .. d^ '*" H. C. ivitehie. . do Width. Area o( Section. Me-in Velo-jity. Gauge Height. Feet. TOO Mi 978 905 97-5 110-5 110-0 97-5 94-5 97-5 97-5 985 MO Sq.ft. Ft. perwc. 189-00 308-70 19800 178-75 189-85 314-75 285-83 190-35 178-00 198-70 179-00 189-01) 187-40 0-42 0-57 0-594 0-24 0-84 2-58 2-50 0-92 0-70 0-78 0-71 0-71 0-48 Feet. Discbarge. Sec.-ft. 2-43 80-08 2-40 118-83 2-35 117-59 2 17 43 17 2-37 121-14 3-44 800-92 3-32 715-80 2-42 174-74 2-3.? 122-80 2-37 152-80 2-38 127-00 2-37 134-00 2-30 80-40 254 114 30 Ml ': BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAGE 988 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se Daily Gauge Height A>fD Discharge of Jumpingpound Creek near Jumping Pound, Alta., for 1912. April. May. Dm. Juno. 7 8. » 10 II 12.. 1.1.. M.. IS.. 16 . 17 18 Gauge Height. 19 20 ! 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 29 ' 30 •2-43 2-40 2'2J 2-2.5 2-2.1 2-20 2-30 2-20 2-30 2- 18 2-18 i-i!t 2-M Dis- charge. Feet. ! Sw.-ft. sn-iw 2s-no 29-00 2.5-00 20-00 20-iiO 21-00 21 -.VI I90O 19 -.V) 17-00 220-00 'Shiflini coaditiom frnin April IS to May 3' Gauge Height. Feet 2 SI 2-.M 2.,50 2-70 2 (in 2-58 2-.M 2-i53 2-M 2-43 2-39 2 3.1 2-;w 2-:n 2-40 2-41 2-40 2-4.5 2 5.5 2 S5 2-70 2 -.59 2-6.5 2-«0 2-55 2-60 2-«n 2-4.5 2-40 2-38 2-3.5 Dis- charge Si'c-fl. HON. (10 16.5 -nil 140-IMI 280-00 234-1)0 182-00 174-IK) ia«'0O 177-0O 120-00 1114-00 89 -IX) 90-01) 90 -.50 115-00 U.H-.V) ILS-OO 144 III) 198-00 200-00 286-00 226-00 262-01) 237 -IKI 210(10 23800 240-00 160 00 138-00 126-IN) 117.50 Gauge Hrighl. I-'cot . 2-34 2 36 2-40 2 -12 2-31 2-27 2 25 2-29 2-2K 2-25 2-2!) > 18 2 15 2 25 3 35 3 40 3-03 3-01 2 -CO 2-Sll 2 60 2 -.511 2-48 2-45 2 -.5(1 2-45 2 45 2 43 2-40 2-55 Dia- charge. Sec -It. 112-60 12180 14100 103. 80 95-00 8240 74'aO 90-80 84-SO 7400 56-00 90-00 41.00 74.00 736-00 772. 00 512-40 498.80 42500 363-00 248-00 19(00 182-60 167-00 194-00 16700 167-00 lS6-«0 14100 220-00 tt 25E-18 »« DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hll 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Jumpingpound Creek, near Jumping Pound, for 1912.— Concluded. D**. J.. >.. I . 4.. 5.. « . 7.. 8.. • .. 10.. II.. 12.. IS.. 14.. M . 16.. 17.. 18.. 19.. K> . 21.. 21.. 22.. M.. ».. 26.. »., 28. ». 20.. July. AufUt. September. October. HcS!^. Du- charfe. Giraae HdcEt. Feet. I 8ee.-lt. t Feet. 2-50 2-70 2-90 2-95 3'MI 3-10 3-25 ' 3-60 3-go 4-25 194 304 425- 458 492- 560- 664 916- 1,132- 1,384- 00 ■00 00 00 ooj ool z ooj 00 4-00 1,204-00 3-60 I 916-OOi 3-80 il,060-00 3-60 I 916-00 3-40 I 772-00 3-30 3-20 I 3-0O 2-80 ! 3-10 I 700-00 628-00 492-00 363-00: sao-ool 3-00 I 492-00 3-00 i 492-00 3-40 I 772-00 4-00 1.204-00 4-00 :i. 204-00 3-80 il, 060-00 3- 30 I 700-OOi 2-76 2-70 2-65 2-60 2-55 2-60 2-yj 2-45 2-40 2-35 245 2-55 2-50 2-50 2-47 2-43 2-95 2-90 2-70 2-60 2-55 2-90 I 2-39 2-30 2-96 ' Die- eharta. Gauge Height. nia- charge. iHeigl Gauge I Dt(- gnt.l ehaiga Sec.-rt. 333-00 304-00 376-00 248-00 2S9-U0 248-00 194-00 167-00 141-00 117-00 167-00 220-00 194-00 194-00 177-80 196-60 498-00 429-00 304-00 248-00 22000 I 19400 I 117-00 I 99-00 I 229-60 i 3-50 I 194-00 3-15 3-00 594-001 492-00 438-201 I 3-66 2-60 2-90 2-49 2-80 ! 363-001 2-40 Feet. , Sec.-(t. 2-38 ; 131-40 2-35 I 11700 2-38 131 40 238 I 131-40 2-90 194-00 276-00 I 248-00 194-00 ! 167-00 j 141-00 |. Feet. I Sec.-ft. 2-60 : 248-00 261 293-60 269 I 276-00 2-60 i 248-00 2-60 1 248-00 I 2-60 248-00 2-50 194-00 2-40 141-00 2-35 117-00 2-30 99-00 229 74-00 2-40 14100 2-40 141-00 2-39 117-00 2-30 99 00 2-25 2-30 2-30 2-35 2-30 2-36 2-34 2-30 2-31 2-30 74-00 95-00 99-00 117-00 9500 121-80 112-eO 95-00 99-40 95 00 2-30 i 228 j 2-28 I 2-29 ! 2-30 I 2-30 ! 2-29 230 2-29 { 2-30 2-39 : 2-38 I 2-40 ; 2-38 ' 2-37 2-36 I 2-36 2-35 2-35 2-35 2-35 ' 2-34 ! 2-35 : 2-35 : 2-32 2-.tO 2-29 I 2-28 2-27 ! 2-26 i 9500 86-60 86-60 90-80 95-00 95-00 9080 95-00 90-80 99-00 117-00 131-40 Kl-00 131-40 126-60 121-80 121-80 117-00 117-00 117-00 117-00 112-60 117-00 117-00 103-80 95-00 90-80 86-60 82-40 78-20 November. Gauge I Dia- Height. cbane. 2-26 I 78-20 Feet. IHee.-tt. 2-30 2-30 230 2-30 2 30 2-30 2-30 230 2-30 2-30 2-30 2-30 2-30 2-30 2-30 95-00 •9-00 •9-00 •9-00 95-00 •5-00 95-00 95-00 95-00 •5-00 95-00 •5-00 95-00 95-00 95-00 Nor.— Gauge was not read after Nov. 15. II Monthly Discharge of Jumpingpound Creek near Jumping Pound, for 1912- (Drainage area, 187 square miles.) DncHAKQI IN S«C0KD-FltT RuN-Orr. Month. Maximum. 1 Minimum. Mean. Per Square Mile. Depth in inches Total on in Drainage Acre-feet. Area. April 220 308 772 1 384 19-0 890 410 494 179-9 211-5 708-1 222-6 144-7 104-6 95-0 0-24 0-94 1-13 3-78 119 0-77 0-96 0-51 116 1,171 1-084 10,816 1261 13,585 4-398 43,539 1372 13,689 0-859 8,611 0-646 6,429 0-284 : 2,826 Miy Jm Jaly August 333 1 "bS-O 276 1 74 131 78-2 950 I 99-0 i September October November (1-15) The period • 980 N,«t2 _^ Non.— No gauge readtagg after Nov. 15. sow I.IVER POWER AAD STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Discharge Measurements of Bow River at Calgary, Alta., in 1908-9. Date. Hydrofrapher. 1908. April M May 11 May 1« Jmw 3 July 20 Sept. 1 Oct. » IMS. April 23 May 21 June 7 June June July 2« 30 7... July le Aug. A»«. Hept < M 17 n« 2* P. M.Sauder do H. K. Cttrwttllon. I>. M Sauder H. H- Cttrscullen,, do P. M. Sauder P. M. Sauder do do J. C. Keith do do do do do do P. M. .Sauder Width Area of Mean i Gauge Di». '"•"°- arctioa velocil>. | height. charge. wt. Sq. ft. ft. per sec. Feet Ree-tt. 192.5 730 273 3-35 1,996 2100 ' 1,059 4. 72 5-00 4,994 2180 : I.IW 522 538 «,0!U 2a8.t> l,f93 -»: 8-03 13,099 287-9 ■ 3.234 •82 «99 10,779 211. .1 l.«07 2-N. 4-50 4,10» 201-8 1.404 1 IH 3-52 2.284 174-0 I.I6U 1 07 2-«g 1.248 20S-5 1.742 252 3-118 3.713 2S4-.5 2.244 571 705 12.807 274 2.I.W 5-21 «-73 11,242 277.5 2.074 4-91 8-43 10,179 :04 2 2.WB 7-»7 8-89 21,952 278.5 2.09.5 4-90 64« 10,272 228-5 1,»2I 3 85 5-48 7,019 209-U I..564 2 71 4-40 4,253 203-5 1.425 : 2-18 3-785 3,0i-J 196-5 1.30«, 1 SO 3-30 1,95* Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow Rivor, at Calgary, Alta., for 1908. 19 . 20 22,. ■■ 23 24 25 26 27 28 » 30 1 .11 1 5-50 5-50 5-50 5 511 5-60 25e— 18i \^M. 3W nEPART.UEyT OF TBE IKTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Daily Gauge Height and Dihcharoe of Bow River, at Calgary, Alts., for 1909. D.J. April. May. Juiw I Oaiue I height. Dia- j Gauge charge. | height. Dis- charge. Feet. r. ».. 4.. t.. •.. 7.. (.. •.. 10.. II.. IS.. 14.. U.. M.. ir.. u.. w.. »... It.. a... ta... at... n.. M... r... » . n.. 30.. See.-ft. Feet. 8ec.-ft. J-70 I 1.280 1,280 1,280 1,280 1,280 1,440 1,440 1,440 1,620 1,280 1,280 2-ro 2-70 2-70 2-70 280 2-80 2-80 2-90 2-70 2-70 2. 70 2.«0 330 3-70 300 2m 2-80 2-80 : 2-70 2-80 j 3'30 : 3' 10 380 3,go 3-70 ; 3, 50 ' 3'3o : 3-30 : 3-70 400 400 4-20 4-30 4-80 1,280 1,020 2.370 3,13U l,NOO 1,620 1.440 1,440 1,280 1.440 2.370 1.M3 2.750 2,750 , July. Gauge height. Di>- chaige. Gauge height. Dis- charge. 3,760 4,200 4,430 5,640 5W) 8,740 ; 5-7i) 8,120 • 600 9,050 ! 6.2.1 9.700 6-30 10,040 620 «,700 Feet. 8ee.-ft. 6-60 ' 760 ■ 860 8-30 7-90 11.100 15,230 20.220 18,660 16,670 760 i 15,230 7. 00 12,600 I 660 10,971 I 6-30 : 9,884 6- 30 ' 9,873 6. 60 [ 7, 50 780 820 ' 3.1.10 8 10 2.7,» 800 2,370 8-20 2.370 8-30 3,130 i 8-20 3.760 8-20 800 I 7-90 ! 7-70 I 7-10 I 6 90 6-80 i 6. SO 650 6-50 6-40 10,936 14,684 ' 16,054 ; 18,024 I 17,504 16.988 I 17,974 1 18,470 j 17,941 ' 17.925 1 16,910 I 16.391 15. '41 I 12,776 11.922 11,510 10,400 10,400 10.400 I 10,040 ! Feet. I Reo.-(t. 11,130 11,910 12,3,30 13,610 14,48r. 14,480 22,020 21,490 19,380 18,340 15,860 14,940 13 610 12,750 11,130 10,400 10,400 10,0411 9,360 8,690 8,040 8,040 7,740 S,040 8.360 8,690 11,510 11,130 9,700 9,020 8,690 6-70 6-90 I 700 7-30 7-50 7-50 O'OO 890 8-50 ' 8-30 7-80 7-80 ' 7-.10 , 710 I 6-70 ! 6. 50 i 6. 50 < 640 ; 6,20 600 I 5-80 I 5-80 5-70 5-8") I j'90 C'OO > 6 80 I 6.70 ; 6.30 ! G'lO I 600 i «0H' lilVKIt I'OWKH AM) STOIlAdE ^gt SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily (jauge Height and Dihchakge of Bow River, at Calgary. Altn., for \WS>.— Continued. Day. AufUat. Heptember. October. I Gaune r>iit- height. chame. Fwt. Sw.-tt. 1.. 2.. 3.. 4.. S. 6. 7.. 8.. B. 10.. II. 13. 13. 14. U. 18. !«.. ».. 21. 22.. 23.. 34. 2S.. 28.. 27. 28.. 29. 30.. 4-70 4-7U 4-70 4-70 4«0 4-4fl 4-50 4'y. Uwm Hmcht. Dia- Chans. Fml. »eeAx. 3.0 31 3-2 3.2 I 3.3 { 4-0 i 4.» j 4 C ! Ciuin I Du- Hei(ht.icbana. June. HeiKht. charie. 7M 1.1*0 I.IM j I.IM ' I.IM ' I.IM I.IM i,tm I.IM I.IM l,IM I.IM ; I.IM i l,3M !,3M I.SM 1.7M , I.7M ; 2,3M ; 3.470 3,030 4,A20 (.110 4. MO Feet. See.-tt. 4« 4.5 42 42 4 2 41 4 S .11 .12 5 S 50 34 .1.2 5 1 SO 4* 4 8 4.H 4 9 4.» 4. 1) I 4.(1 30 3.« { S.« « .1 8 8 «S A3 «0 S.| 4,8M 4,«30 Feet. .See.-tt. 7.710 7.080 «.4lin «.IW 3.810 3.S40 8,«40 3..3M 3.Mfl 3.640 3.Mfl 3,3M 3.810 7.710 8,720 10,820 12,070 11,300 10.920 9,070 l,UO 3.3 • 3,930 8 1 3,930 3.8 3.830 38 3,700 5.9 4,8m 38 3.180 83 8.480 8 1 7.380 80 8.3 ! 7 1 I 7.3 i 88 j 8 7 I 8.7 •67 •7 3 •71 •89 •8.9 70 ! 8 8 : 8.3 8 1 j 61 64 6 8 88 83 8,380 8,070 9,430 8,380 7.710 8.730 8,720 ■0.I7D 9,430 9.070 9,800 13,240 14,020 12,070 11,880 11,6m II, 8M 13.640 13. 7M 11,800 11,680 11.880 10,430 8,380 8.710 8,710 9,730 10.430 10,430 lo.oao Thmiiiiu emditinm ROW RIVER POWER AVO HTORAQE 269 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow River, at Calgary, for 1910. — Continued. July. D«r. I . 2.. .1.. 4.. 5. •.. 7.. S.. •.. W.. II. 13.. II.. !«.. It. la.. 17.. M.. 19.. W. at.. ».. n.. M. is. M.. 27.. M.. ». 30. Gouge Heiiht Fast. «.5 6-3 a. I ai 8-U J'9 S'» S'U SI) 5!) il'S 5't) «.« s-n ai a:t A.3 a-.i 8.1 i.} IS 11 s« .V7 j.j S3 ii l.n 4') 4'8 4-8 Din- chance. Soc.Jt. 10,080 g,3iio «.7lct .s,71(l 8, 380 N.naii H.oan K.n«(i s.nwi N.CMll K.OAII s.iwii N.7in 9„ig(i ».3tKl »'3 8,710 K.oan 7,4:ii( a.8») 0.23(1 5,Mii S,42fl .Mail 4,UIU 4,110 Aocust. September. October. GauBo Heiiht. Din- charge. I Gouge I Height. Dis- charge. Gauge Height. Feet. 48 4-8 4-S 4-8 4'V .V4-5 .1-7 .■SO .^'4 .1-4 S'4 .■5 4 hi .51 hA .i-3 M .111 48 Stt.At,. 4.010 4.910 4,910 4,910 J,l«(l 8.231 .5.4211 4,11111 4.910 4 S 4,910 4-8 4. 9111 4 7 4.A0II 4 7 4.880 r 4 .5 4.191) 4 4 3.980 4 3 3,740 4''.' 3,»ao ! 4 1 3,310 : 4 1 3.310 i 1 < ' 3.. 310 1 I Feet. I 9ee.4t. 41 40 4 40 4 1 8,74.5 4 3 7.4311 4-3 7,1211 4 3 8,S2ll 4 2 6,520 4 1 8.520 4 6,S2ll 40 8.520 4-0 1 8,5211 4 : 8,520 4 1 4 1 4 3 4 3 4-3 4-3 4 3 4-3 4'3 4-3 4-3 3-310 3.100 3. 100 3,100 3,310 3,740 3,740 3,74(1 3,530 3.310 3.100 3,100 31011 3,100 3,310 3.310 3,740 3,740 3,740 3,740 3,740 3,740 3,740 3,740 3,740 Feet. 39 39 3.9 3» 3-8 3 8 3 (I 4 II 4 II 4 4 2 42 4-3 4-2 4 2 4 3 3,740 4 2 3,530 4 1 3,310 , 40 3, ion 3 9 3,100 Dis- charge. Sec.-ft. 3,900 3.90O 2,W0 2,100 2,710 2,710 2,900 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,530 3,530 3,740 3,530 3,530 4 1 3,310 4 2 3. 530 4 2 3,530 43 3,740 4 2 3,530 42 3,530 4 1 3,310 4 3,100 4 (t 3,100 411 3,1011 39 2.900 3-8 2,710 3-7 2,530 38 3,330 3 8 2,330 31 2,»B 1' Monthly Discharge of Bow River at ("aluary, for 1910. I Urainiige area. 3.90(1 square milee.) MoKTH. ^11-10. jZ July Aetuel October The period.. DlmlURtlK IN SxcnND-FsKT. HiN-drr. MHviiiium. Miniiiium. 110 (1711 II2II IMII 431 740 7411 7*1 3.700 7., -10 4.910 3,, 110 2,9(1(1 2,3.10 I Depth in I Per squnn< ' iftrhi.^ im : Ttital ia mill' . Druimige ' arro (Mt. artia. 1,153 8,8*3 111,427 7,981 .5, 279 3.441 3.(194 500 1-710 2 870 2-04U 1 3511 0-8X2 U 793 0-44a 1 9711 2 WHI 2 33(1 I .VKI 984 ' «I4 «3.*3S 410. »)8 810.439 489. 4mi 324.094 3(H,7X) 190.318 3.333.a0( 263 DEPARTUEXT OF THE INTERIOR 1' h m 6 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Discharge Measursments cf Bow River at Calgary, Alta., in 1910*-1911. '2i^ f^'""!.*' """ !*• P"«»f rtmtiMi in 1910 mra publUhxl in the Sennd Aniunl Report. DsU nre inauflirient nput* daily duehnins u November ud December ot 1910. ^^ x^ m ISO sin 1 W j 770 I'M 700 117 '■ 7n now RIVKR POWER AMt STORAUK 261 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow River at Calgary, Alta., for 1911. DAT. 1.. t 1 4 . $ (. . 7.. «.. •.. 10 . II.. 11 . U . 14 . II. . M IT M. I* n n 27 n n » 11 January. February. March. April. May. June. Gauge | Di«- ! Gaiute Di«- Heiiiht.' charge. : Height, charge. i Fn- ' 1-83 i-ro 1-43 1 I'M 3'3I 3«7 1-7S I'M 1 3' It 3'4t 3'8a 410 4U 4'M 4'71 4'U 446 437 4-30 4'J7 4'S7 4'M 3M 3«7 3M It yr 8ec..ft. Feet. Sec.-ft. A4U eoo too 3. 74 3K mil 3'S7 928 3'73 l.(«W 3'«7 975 3'(W 980 1 3'66 970 ! 3'«7 975 3'(I7 975 1 3'M 9«9 .9"^^ Dis- Gauge Din- Gauge Height Dis- Gauge Dii^ Height charge Height. charge. charge. Height charge. Feet Sec.Jt. Feet. 8ec.-(t. Feet. Sec.-ft. Feet. ; Soc.-ft. 3 35 840 2'«t 8«a I'M 1,495 387 ' 5,970 3. 30 820 2-47 860 170 1.590 4 05 6,«ai 3'42 888 257 »M 1'83 i,«7n 417 7,031 3'40 m) 2 44 930 1'84 l,«80 49* 10.144 3'40 8*) 2'45 989 l'«8 1,83« 4 75 9,240 1,000 •Kl 1,000 1,010 MO 910 830 MO MO MO 1,040 3.65 3. 70 3-83 3'55 3S« 3 ,10 3.37 3'4S 3-43 3'24 3'43 3 K 3'42 3'24 344 344 3-45 343 9«5 990 955 920 916 900 848 . 880 872 79« 872 840 >m 796 876 876 880 872 3'35 3.35 3'37 3'3« 3'35 3 '35 3'35 3-35 3. 40 3-45 3-37 3'37 3'33 3'4« 3 '60 3..Vi 3 m 3. .56 3.35 3. 15 3. 08 2 95 295 2 80 2'82 I'TO 840 840 848 844 840 840 840 84(1 860 ' 880 848 848 832 8H4 940 820 810 850 83U : »n 2'67 2'75 2-57 2. 70 2 73 2'64 2-5(1 2'45 1-84 1'97 205 I 87 207 1-67 I'Tl) 9U I '76 924 188 924 115 840 I 1'.UI 810 233 1'73 1-70 1-66 1-68 1 67 1.120 I 1,200 I 1,170 j 1.270 ^ 1,330 I 1.340 1,320 •■ 1.340 1.040 1,180 1.300 1,220 1,450 ; 1.190 1,270 , 1,390 1,560 1,069 , 1,428 2,288 1,577 1,550 1,514 1.532 1.523 ' 2'25 2-33 2'35 2-37 2-31 2'27 2'24 2-34 2'37 2'37 2'40 2'97 2'94 290 2'85 2 85 30!) 3. 05 297 2'»3 2'77 2'6fl 2'65 2-59 2-82 2,170 2,288 2,320 2,352 2.3')4 ^ 2,198 ' 2.156 ' 2.304 2.352 2,352 2,400 3.534 3,4«8 3,380 I 3.270 I 3.270 3.600 3.720 3,5:14 3,380 3,094 2,920 2,840 2,722 3,204 4.55 4. 32 4'30 4. 27 4. 12 4 10 4 22 4 57 S'85 5 97 6-05 6.110 5-84 5-75 5'60 5 J2 547 3' 77 6- 10 6. 25 6. 1)5 5 56 547 547 549 J 3.00 ! 1,600 8.450 7.576 7.500 7,. 393 6,852 6,780 7.212 8,526 14,290 14,890 15,300 15.040 14.240 13,800 13,320 13,180 13.150 14,340 15,740 16,463 15,840 14.081) 13.330 13.330 13,430 * Not Duflineat dkin to nimiMle diaeharge from Jan. 5 to Jan. 10. . 262 DEPARTUENT OF TBE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow River at Calgary, Alta., for 1911 . — Contimied. D*T. July. Augiut. uauae Hei(ht. Dia- <'':iuge charge tloixht Faet. 8ae.-(t. 1 «M 13,730 3 S'M 13,230 3 5-M I2,tm 4 S-30 12,480 » S-0« 11,280: • 4-74 »,«gO I 7 4-77 »,830 ; * SOS 11,230 » 4-M 10,730' 10 4-7S 9,730 11 4 -gj 10,230 i 11 4-S4 8,712 1» 4-42 8,13* 14 4-40 8,040 1» 4-48 8.t04 W 4-53 8.«M IJ 4«0 »,000 ;; 4M I »,Mo IS 4 67 «,33« » 4-57 8,BS« " 4M 8,«1( H 4-53 «,tM 2 4M 8,7M j; 4-4S 8.280 » 4-40 8,040 2 4-4« , 8,328 2 ♦•» I «.7«o 2 ; 4-40 8.040 2 S(i WI2-3 1-3.1 6-49 l.lM-6 ilLI 961-7 1-2.1 6-2.1 1,2040 2(«7 mno 1-24 S-9» tM.O 2«7 7.H-2 1-1.1 5 74 flM.4 287 722-7 1 07 S65 \ 31 «.u ; ' 1 Fwt. ISec.-rt. 680 720 720 720 1,000 830 1.000 MO February. Hareh. 'auae HfOt Heifl Feet 6-35 6-30 6-30 t-Vi 6'1» 615 6-20 6-25 0-23 6-20 charge Ste.-tt. 1,190 1,070 1,080 1,080 1,060 1.070 1,110 1,160 ,160 1,160 April. May. June. Qaaje j Di^ Gaum I Dm- Q^e Du- Gauie i Dis- HenEt i charte He;«h^ I charie HeifEt I char»e Height .' chiSe NoTia.— Ice roBditiona from Jan. 1 to Apr. 6. From Jan. 1 to Jan. 14 ettremely cold. 870 6' 15 1.100 sm , 9«0 6 13 1.088 6-90 1,070 612 1.082 5-68 1,070 6' 12 1.082 5 90 j 1.197 6- 10 1,070 5-80 i 1,S10 6- 10 1,070 5-75 1,670 605 1,040 5-80 1,410 606 1,040 540 1.410 603 1,028 5-75 1 1.040 502 962 5-75 i 1,210 592 962 5-80 1,370 593 968 565 1,370 5-94 974 5-45 1.310 594 974 569 1,350 5-96 080 569 1,320 .V95 980 5-50 1.320 5.97 992 5-50 1,300 5-97 992 S'40 1,300 596 980 5-25 1,270 5'i5 1.010 i 1 5-00 j 1 1 Feet. 5-94 5-95 5-97 508 5-97 j 5.95 ! 5. 1 ' 5. 68 ! 5. OS 5. 85 Sec.-Jt. 974 980 992 998 992 980 855 840 825 925 950 950 840 950 900 875 900 710 875 875 900 825 I 850 1.110 1.240 1,250 1,400 I 1.450 : 1.490 1,640 1,510 I Feet. 8«..ft. i Feet. : Sec.-lt. ■ Feet. | Sec.-ft. 500 495 4-93 4-95 4-80 4-40 j 4-20 4- 10 4-40 ! 4-27 I 4-15 405 4-03 4-03 405 4-30 423 4- 15 4-08 3-92 3. 81 3-70 3-72 3-75 3-75 3-n 3-75 3-77 3-93 3-87 i 1.740 1.850 1,990 2,160 2,170 2,020 1.780 l,«20 : 2,120 1,899 1,131 1,105 1,131 1,348 1,261 4-40 I 4-18 ! 4-10 ' 4-30 ' 4-32 4-32 I 431 ! 4-40 4-42 ! 4-39 1,700 4-38 1,540 443 1,508 442 1.508 4-53 1,340 503 1,950 537 1,831 563 1,700 5-55 1,588 553 1,332 5-48 1,183 533 1,040 533 1,066 5-30 1,105 5-27 1,105 5-25 5-43 5-75 5-75 5-63 5-53 5-35 2.420 1.748 1,620 1,990 1,984 1,984 I 1,967 I 2,120 2,160 2,103 2.086 2.180 2,160 2,380 3,506 4.m 5.113 4.870 ■ 4.810 4,580 4.258 4,258 j 4,180 4.105 4.055 4.524 5,485 5.485 5,113 4,810 : 4,310 I 5-15 ; 5-10 4-97 4-97 I 4-99 ; 4-73 ' 4-55 , 4-75 ' 5-00 I 5-52 1 5-52 ' 5-72 ' 5-98 6-42 I 699 i 7-45 ' 7-72 i 7-70 ! 7-62 I 7-50^ 7-38 7-35 7-26 I 7-20 ! 7-13 I 7-07 1 7-no ! 7. 02 I 6-95 : 6-73 I 3.805 3.680 3.358 3,358 3,310 2,796 i.llO 2,840 3.430 4,780 4,780 5.392 6,258 7,629 10,474 12,625 13.894 13,800 13,424 12,860 12,296 12,155 11.732 11,450 11,121 10,842 10,520 10,612 10,290 9,296 now m\ER POWER AND STORAOK 265 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Bow River at ('algarj-, for 1912.— Concluded. Auxudt. DAT. September. October. Decent biT. 'lino j DiB- i Gau«e Din- Gauge OU- li iRht. chsrue Height, charge. Height, charge Gauce Dis- Gauge Dis- Gauge Ou*- Height. charge. Height charge. Height, charge. Feet. : Sec.-tt. , Feet. Sec.-(t. Feet. .Sec.-(t. 1 » !l 0.626 6,814 6.814 6. 1511 6,006 , 622 6' 13 S-93 5. 61 5-47 5-58 3. 69 5. 77 5. 74 5. 68 5' 73 581 3.69 5. 60 5. 38 7,160 6,814 6.078 5,051 4 616 4,060 5,299 5,, 547 5,4.54 5,26S 5,423 5,673 5,299 5,020 4,96U Feet. Sec.-ft. '. Feet. 8ec.-(t. I Feet. Sec.-/t. sno 5()0 4-99 4-98 4»7 4'«5 ' 4-94 : 4-97 4. 99 303 301 4. 99 4. 96 4.93 4. 84 ' 3.4.10 3,430 3,40« 3,. 382 3,358 3,310 3,286 3,358 3,406 3,. 505 3,4.55 3,406 3 334 3,262 3,046 4-45 4-60 4-62 4. 62 4-60 4. ,55 4-48 4-45 4.53 4. 50 4.45 4.43 4.40 4.41 4-39 2,220 2. .520 3,562 2,562 2,520 2,420 2.280 2,220 401 403 3. 96 4. .31 4-3S 4 19 414 4.1s 2,38') 4. 16 2,320 4 10 2.220 3. 05 2,180 3. 61 2,120 3. 78 2,140 3-98 1,933 3-95 1.420 1,400 1,230 1,720 1,640 1,400 1.300 1,320 1,230 1.130 too ,580 670 830 760 6.30 7,480 5 -v. 4,870 4-83 ' 3.022 4-21 1,797 4. 07 840 5. 29 7,440 , 5.49 4,602 4-80 2.9.VI 4-35 1,865 4 14 .880 6. 5/ 8, .501 5-48 4,664 4-82 1 2,998 4. 29 1,933 4.09 80O 6-, 3 0.205 5 46 4,608 4-84 1 3.046 4 45 2,220 4. 30 980 6-70 0,160 3. 38 4,388 4.86 1 3,094 4-40 2,120 4-21 8.50 8. 68 9,072 5-30 4,180 4-83 1 3.022 4-38 3,086 4 33 940 667 9.028 3-31 4,206 4-80 2,950 4-35 2,033 4 M 9-20 6-65 8,040 3-33 4, £58 4-63 2,625 4 '30 1,930 4-33 860 6»;) 8,7211 3-31 4.206 4-68 1 2,6,88 4.33 2,001 4 .33 810 6-92 10,152 5-27 4.105 4-70 : 2,731) 4 36 2,a52 4. 29 760 7- 13 11,121 3. 24 4,030 4.39 2,709 4 29 1,933 4-23 660 7-(l« 10,796 3. 20 3,931) 4. 63 2,623 3.88 1,274 4 16 580 V03 10,658 : 5. 13 3,753 4-67 ; 2.687 3.93 1,348 4.38 760 6.i2 9,25.1 1 5-06 3,,V>tl 4-70 2.730 4 a5 1,,540 4 42 , 76.) 6 73 9.205 4.95 3,310 4-60 2.520 404 1,524 4 45 7S0 6-47 8, 167 ! i 4-46 1 1 2,240 4-61 ! 870 Monthly DiscHAHtiE of Bow River al Calgary, for 1912. (Oruinanc an.«, 3. 138 ..square iiiilei*.) DiHtHAKtiE IN .SernND.FlCIT. Kt-N-Orr M Month. ianuary Februarv . . . March April May Juar July August. H^ptember.. October November.. December.. The year. . . Muxini>jm. i .Miniinuni. Me»n. Square Mile. 1.670 1.160 1,640 2,170 5,485 13.894 15.210 11,121 7.160 3,905 2,M2 1, 7211 6*) 980 823 I.IH'I 1.620 2.420 6,890 6,006 3.310 2,240 1,274 580 1,100 i.ms 1,030 1.571 3.432 8,185 10,772 8,169 4.847 3,0M 2,076 0«S 035 0.13 033 0.50 1 110 3-61 3-43 2. 60 1S4 98 oat OSl Depth in inches OR Drainage .\re;i. 040 0.36 0-38 fl'56 1-26 2-91 396 300 '.•72 M3 074 0'3C 1«.77 Tot.ll in .\cre-feet. 68,188 60,1M 63.330 93,400 211,024 487.040 662,400 W2,3M 2Sa.430 I8«,4a0 m.Ho «o,s«s 2,ao«,oii i: f-'! •I'- " B • ! ,•1 266 DEPARTMENT OF TBB INTSXIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1»16 Discharge Mkasurements of Elbow River at Calgary, Alta., in 1908-1909. o>t«. 1108. May « May U June July 21 July 2S Sept. 3 Oct. 7 1«N. May 7 May 18 May M Jme 8 Jiue 24 July 3 July IS Aug. 7 Au|. 30 Bydraciaphar. *"">• iss^ Mmb Telocity. Gaoce heifht. Dim- Feet. I 8q.lt. iFt. Feet. P.H.Sauder i i3i.{ < H. R. Caneallen Jr-J | P.M.Sauder im.j H.R. Candle. JiS.S 3<» I W-0 1 do 19S-A 1 P.M.Swider :.,:| jg.o , i H. H. Canealles m.n ' P.M.Sauder ,,, ig.o do UT.n J.C.Keith : i 1410 *> I«0 *> I MOO go I u»-o *> 1380 *> mo 280 0'7« 100 3W 1-49 less 822 6-34 930 370 1-43 1-67 350 1-27 l'62t 303 om MIS 288 0-87 lot 278 3SS «7 4«7 444 42S 41S 3W 2M 0-83 i 0758 i 1-35 1'32S 3-72 343 2M 211 124 l'»4 ! 1-82 1-82 j 1-80 1-76 1-37 1-40 0-»2 OWS 1 8ee.-ft. 212 SW 4.IU jta» 445 287 282 220 478 2.487 878 880 TK 748 4(3 270 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Elbow River, at Calgary, Alta for 1908. D«T. May. OaucB Die- Heicht. charie Feet. Sec.-ft. June. July Oauie I Die- Height. I chaice. Gauge Height. Die- oliarge. II 12. 13 14. IS 18 17.. 18 . 18 . 100 ! 1-50 1-40 I 1-30 1-46 IM 1'8S 1-70 212 i 400 : 410 : Feet. 3'3S S-70 4-40 500 5-60 580 4'8S 4' IS 3m 3-70 21 22 23. 24 25 28. 27.. 28.. 30. 1-75 ' 2-35 215 200 205 205 200 180 1-90 1-85 2'OS 2' 10 2' 10 2' 10 205 2-50 .180 3-70 43S 350 480 3'2S 55(1 300 S80 300 nin 300 .040 2-70 m 2-50 779 2-50 810 205 810 [ 77.» 70S 706 I 740 810 i 84: ' S45 i 84S 810 I .189 !. 2-70 255 2-50 2-55 2. 80 2-95 I 285 I 2-70 2-40 2'2S Sec.-(t. I Feet. Sec.-ft. 2.022 5.815 3,435 4.400 S,440 5,440 4. 152 3,062 2,637 2,440 2.440 2,195 1,910 1,840 1,840 ] 1,640 I 1,340 ! 1,165 ; 1,165 i 1,285 ; 1,340 ; 1,207 i 1.165 1,207 1,435 1,587 1.587 1,340 1,060 , 880 2Ij 2-30 2-30 2 .10 2-30 2-20 2' 15 210 2- 10 ' 2 10 j 2ai 2-00 j 2 110 ' 190 ; 1-90 t 1-80 i 1-80 ', 1-90 ! 1-90 1-80 ' 1-80 1-75 1-70 1-70 1-80 I-.W t'.V) 1'40 1 40 1-30 882 1,000 1,000 1,000 1.800 820 882 845 845 849 810 775 775 70S 70S 840 840 70ft 70S 840 «10 580 580 520 480 4«D 410 4IU 380 1-30 ; 388 tj&jg. BOW RIVER POWER AND BTOKiOE at7 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Elbow River, at Calgary, Alta., for 1908.— Continued. .\ugwt. September. October. November. D.»v. Cause I Die- Gwice ' _ tight, charge. Height.; charge, j Height charge. iHeVght.!chai«e. Heigh Di*- I Gauge Die- \ Gauge : Di<- Feet. :«c.-ft. Feet. 8ec.-(t. i ; 1-30 i I 1-30 * 1-3(1 *• ; 1-30 * 1-311 5 1-20 I ; 1-20 i j 1-20 ,;• 1-20 "' ! 1-20 » 1-25 JJ I 1-30 }J I 1-30 it 1-30 '* 1-30 {*■ 1-20 *> ; 1-20 " 1-10 S- I-IO 2 1-10 »• 1-4(1 » ^ 1-35 g 1-20 » : 1-20 » , I.JO »1 1 1-20 38(1 380 360 3811 '. 310 , 310 310 I 310 ' 310 ' ■as i 380 360 360 360 : 360 310 310 310 : 310 I 280 I 280 j 280 i 410 : 410 3«5 ! 360 310 I 310 I 310 I 310 :.. 1-20 1-20 < 120 ! 1-20 1-30 ; 1-20 1-20 1-20 110 1-10 ; 1-10 : 1-10 ! 1-10 : 1 m 1 10 1-10 1 10 ^ I- 10 ; 1-10 1-10 1-10 ! i-iu I MO I 1-15 1 1-20 1-20 120 1-20 1 10 I-IO 310 310 310 310 310 i 310 ; 310 I .in 260 260 ' 280 260 280 280 I 280 ! i 280 • 260 ' 260 I 260 I 280 I 280 : 280 I 280 285 310 ' i 310 310 310 280 260 Feet. 1-10 1-10 110 1-10 . 1-10 : 1-10 l-iO 1-10 110 1-10 1-10 1-10 I 1-00 I 1-00 1-00 lOO 1-00 , 1-00 1-00 1-00 100 ' 1-00 I l-OO 100 100 1 00 1-0,^ 1-10 1 1-20 1 1-25 1 130 1 Sec-It. Feet. See.-(t. 280 1-30 I 3M> 280 1-20 ' 310 260 i 1-10 an 280 1-00 213 280 . 1-00 212 260 ; 100 212 280 1-00 213 280 1-00 i 112 260 1-00 : 313 260 I 1-On ! 312 280 1-00 212 260 ! 1-00 i 213 212 1 212 ' 212 1 212 '• I 212 ' ' 212 i i 212 : 212 i 212 ' 212 ; • 212 ■ ' 212 212 < 212 ; I 236 ■ I.... 280 > I.. . 310 ' j.. 335 1 ; 360 I I ■: ^ji ; ; ';■ ■ 268 DEPARTMEVT OF THE IXTERIOR 5 GEORGE v.. A. 1915 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Elbow River, at Calirary, Alta.. for 1909. May. June. U*r. July. Aggiwt. September. October. Hi ^ i.' Gauce j Die- ; Gaiue i Dw- ^ Gaiue ! Die- , Uauie i Die- Gwin Di^ . Osuce Hw^|chai»r ]Hei«Et^,oh»ie^iHei«Tit ; chmrie. iH^ Feet. 8ec.-f«, : Feet. 1 0-«0 I t 0-90 i i I 1-23 : 4 l-M \ » 103 « 0-82 * OM 8 0-8& » OKI 10 1 0« 11 1-29 12 IISO 13 l-M I M i l-« 15 1-70 1 18 l-M i 17 1 l-M, 18 I 1-32 i 1» • 1-79 20 1 2-04 21 203; 22 i J-0« i 23 : 2-34 i M 2-81 i 25 3-06 I 2« 3-6! ! 27 3-28 ! 28 3-40 i 29 3-39 30 3-25 I 31 301 I 220 j 250 ; 391 i 5U2 : 293 236 243 241 253 307 425 .MO 652 544 680 586 508 442 748 944 935 961 1,218 1.717 2,020 2.757 2.295 i 3,445 I 2,433 ; 2,257 1,957 ■ 334 3-32 4-10 285 2- 87 See. -ft. ! Feet, ' t 8ec.-ft. ; Feet. 1-87 I 1-86 1-79 175 I 1 910 I 807 i 800 < 748 I 717 I 1-55 1-45 I 1-43 ; 1-42 I 1 44 : 1-65 ' 3-66 2-42 2-01 1-98 833 815 927 1,076 1.180 ; 2,282 1,67U 1.375 ! 1,227 i 1,132 i 961 i 1,040 918 870 I 725 ' 673 I 652 645 ; 645 i 580 530 ; ,W8 I 502 514 : 645 ' 1,546 ' 1.295 ; 918 ' 894 1-72 I 1-65 I 1-64 i 1-57 1-62 ! 1-59 1-40 : 143 : 1-43 1 135 133^ 132 131 1-29 128 1-25 ', 1-24 i 1-23 120 , 119 • 1-19 1-17 ■■ 116 112 i 109 ' 1-07 I 104 { 1-05 I 102 j 0-98 I 0-7 i 695 645 I '38 592 624 I 604 490 ; 508 ' 502 460 : 418 442 j 436 ; 43J| 419, 403 I 397 391 I 375 370 j 370 i 360 j 355 3.15 320 311 298 302 289 274 271 0-97 , 0-95 I 0-96 I 0-95 ; 0-95 { 0-94 j 0-91 : 0-93 I 0-93 i 0-42 I 0-94 j 0-93 0-93 I U-91 I 0-93 ; 271 265 I 268 ! 265 265 262 ! 2>!3 i 359 : 359 256 ' 363 : 359 ' 256 I 253 356 Die- charge. O-Ol 353 i 0-90 3.W 093 356 , 0-93 256 091 253 0-91 253 0-91 253 0-91 253 U-9II 250 0-90 250 : 0-91 0-89 0-85 0-83 0-85 2.M 248 241 238 241 0-84 0.84 0-83 0-83 083 0-82 0-81 0-80 0-79 0-79 0-79 0-78 0-78 I 0-77 i 0-76 I 0-79 I 0-78 i 0-78 : 0-77 \ 0-77 1 0-n I 076 ' 0-76 ! 0-75 0-75 I 0.74! 0-73 0-73 0-73 0-73 0-72 See.-ft. 340 340 238 236 236 136 235 233 333 233 232 231 231 230 330 132 231 231 230 230 iV) 230 330 229 239 228 237 237 337 226 236 Monthly Discharge of Elbow River p* Calgary, Alta., for 1908-1909. f Drainacc area, 460 square miles.) DlSTHAROK IN SeCOND-FeET. RuN-Orr. Month. Maximum. Minimum. Moan. Per Square Mile. Depth ; in inches on 1 Drainage Area. Total in Acre^eet . May (8-31) June July Auxust September October November (1-12).. . The period . 1.165 5,615 1,000 410 310 360 360 313 960 360 260 260 212 .12 6945 2,2660 700-3 3.12-6 380-8 244-8 336-5 1-49 4-86 1-50 0-71 0-60 0-52 0-50 1-3.30 5-422 1-729 0819 0-669 0-600 0-233 33,060 134,8,14 43,060 20,450 16,709 15.052 5,624 268.794 ?.t>: September. October .. The period. 2.757 3,320 2.282 693 271 240 220 968-0 2070 ' 2-386 717 1 1.377-3 2-950 3-291 .V)2 : 929-9 1995 2-300 271 4!0-6 0-93U 1061 TU 255-5 0-548 j 0-612 236 1 231-4 490 ' 0565 59,520 81.952 -57.177 26,476 15.303 14.228 254.556 iijasLi: BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA0E SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26* Discharge Measurements of Elbow River at Calgarj-, fo 1910. 209 Dst*. M*y II M>y 37 Jiuw IS July II. Auc. 8 Aui. 2a. I:l6pt. I» Oct. 6 Nov. 3. Nor. 34. Dm. 14. Dm. 31. Hydrogimphar. Width. .C. K«tb do do do do do do [. H. Canieallen do do do do FMt. 13i I3» 13« 135 135 134 140 III6 133 1114 126 120 Aiwot Sq.ft. 3046 371. OS 3S0.IIS 2a8'70 298. 75 384. 25 3»5.4S 3I«.0S 27820 2J'.2S 331.70 310.H Mmu valooity. Ft. lO* 148 1-38 0-925 0.83 0825 164 103 081 0385 0-57 0.333 Oun Iwitnt. Di«- ehani. FMt. 104 ISO 1'33 OMS 0.«7 0-86 1655 l-O 0-8 084 MO 100 SM.-lt. 325.3s S48.04 450.55 276-27 278-74 234-87 647-00 326-V7 22558 a8-39-t I36.43* 70-3J* *Io« oonditioDfl. tMnNrement takes at llridge 400 yards down alream. Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Elbow River at Calgary, for 1910. D*T. April. May. June. II. 12.. 13.. 14.. 15. 16. 17.. 18.. 19.. 2().. :'.t. ■-'1. 26. 27. 2S. 29.. .1'). GauA Dis- CiuufEe ; Dia- Heigbt. I charge. Height . i charge. Fwt -ou -00 .ou ■m .00 •(10 -liu -DO -ou .00 •(« ■00 •(») 01 .09 ■24 -21) ..■ill -31 -.T! -:)4 ■:!4 ■■« .:i.-i ■:1 -.S3 156 76 -59 : 170 76 76 77 87 liw 111) lid 118 121 122 122 122 124 l:ii) i:i7 144 1 112 l«i 113 1-07 1-05 101 99 ■9S ■97 103 im I ■in Mil MH ■99 I 21 l-.W l-.il 1^V> 1 26 1 l.i I 12 1-10 1-36 1-3U 125 1-18 349 MH 323 315 298 290 2H6 2S2 3117 311 3.7 298 294 290 .1S7 «il2 .576 462 412 3,18 1-34 1-65 1-55 1-46 1-35 1-41 1-57 1-58 146 157 IM inn 134 1-28 120 1 17 123 1-22 1^22 1-22 336 468 434 407 372 589 4.M 423 ,182 368 397 392 1 21 1-20 1-18 1 15 108 105 1113 I 02 I 110 99 ■92 -90 ■S6 ■84 ■fa •82 -85 4.i6 -98 B.VI •94 582 •92 526 •95 462 •99 496 '99 1 596 •97 8(12 •97 526 ■98 59« 6112 ■96 •93 387 382 372 358 328 315 307 302 2«4 290 28« 270 263 274 29U 290 282 282 286 278 267 263 2^'>6 243 237 2:13 2311 210 221 213 :!■•• 1 i h ! Is y-ii; 2.': -10 270 DBPARTMBNT OF TBS JVaRIOR 5 OEORQE v.. A. 191S Daily Gauge Height and Discharob of Elbow River at Calgary, for 1910. Continued. Uat. I.. >.. 1.. 4., • . 7.. «.. 9.. 10.. 11.. II.. 13.. 14.. 13. 1«.. 17.. 18.. ».. » . 21.. ».. 23.. 24.. 25.. 36.. 27... 28.. 2»... 30... 11... I Amwt. hptmnbcr. Oclotxr. Gum Du- i Gmm Di>- Onm |H*l|ht. ehmna !Hai|nt. charie. Hricht. ohan*. FMt. •72 •73 •71 'N 7» 8M.-(t. 202 202 IM m rai •71 i 213 101 3«8 115 3«3 113 34« 115 358 FMt. to ■8« ■84 ■M •M 104 122 118 l-'2 :-o« Sm.-H. FMt. 35« 243 237 253 I 270 I 320 I 3M I 373 I 345 I 330 , 1-25 412 115 358 124 402 120 382 118 372 125 407 117 388 125 407 119 377 133 451 113 349 l.« 526 MO 334 l^.. 576 105 315 165 650 100 294 166 657 '98 38« 158 602 •95 274 154 576 •94 270 145 520 93 M7 1-43 508 93 287 141 496 ■92 283 136 467 ■87 24« 131 440 ■84 237 128 423 •79 221 127 418 •85 240 124 402 86 243 120 382 •W 274 ^ 116 113 110 112 109 107 103 I 04 1-04 106 105 105 104 I OS 101 •99 •97 101 ■97 ■95 •94 •93 91 Di»- 0>u* DU- Height, chut* 8eo.-It. 363 349 816 345 332 Nov*mb*r. Daennlwr FMt. ■82 81 ■ao ■78 ■76 GBun Di*- Haight. chuw. 333 ■75 310 307 ■74 207 311 •73 204 311 •72 301 33l> •71 m 315 107 323 315 •85 240 311 ■79 231 307 ■86 343 298 •85 240 290 ■84 237 282 •78 218 299 ••75 310 282 •94 340 274 ■94 313 270 112 338 283 MS 212 26U 100 146 253 ■97 116 250 ■79 90 256 106 130 { 250 122 157 ! 246 126 166 243 141 204 240 135 188 237 8w.-lt. 230 227 324 318 313 Fact. SM.-ft. 1-34 I 119 1-31 108 106 i 101 113 1'07 Ml i 105 I ■99 1^01 •97 I 112 116 161 151 154 139 136 117 136 136 132 120 112 114 107 130 134 132 160 117 130 114 123 121 132 123 132 1225 128 •9(1 80 •84 72 1145 lie 1195 114 118 108 1235 115 1095 00 106 84 104 80 1095 82 •I« oonditions from November 18 to Deoember •11. Monthly Dischakoe of Elbow River at Calgary, for 1910. 'Drainaxe uea, 4S2 equan miles.) Dekharoe in Sec-ond-Fect. RvvOtt. MoaTH. Maximum. I Minimum. .\pril May June July AuxuGi Septembc.-. . October November , December.. The period , 165 603 650 387 412 667 S6S 323 161 76 156 336 204 194 237 237 to 72 Mean. 101 3085 466 282 2875 4219 2916 3M5 119 I ! Depth in I Per aquare incbn on Toul in miie. Draiiaga Acr»FMt. 0309 0-640 0.967 0585 0596 0^R75 0605 0428 0^347 0333 0738 r08 0675 0687 0976 0698 0475 0-285 6.009 18,970 27,727 17,34- 17,678 25,103 17,930 I2,22S 7,317 150,302 ;-*s«k>__ BOW RITMR POWEH AJID aTORAOH zn SESSIONAL PAPER No. 20« DiBCHAR GE Meabchementb of Eibow Rivef at Calgary, Alta., for 1911. D>t*. Hydragraphw. ' Width. !^«l ' „>««>■ \ Owm L. . Ju. i Ju. 10. . Feb. « . Feb. IS.. Mar. 14 . Apr. t . Apr. IS . Mhy I . Hay a.. Jiiae S. ri. R. (-urncallMi H. r. Hit«-hi« B. Kiuwll . JuM 21 July J i ■J»«- I ' H.T. Thome. A"l- » H.BrowB Aug. 23 Seyt. 8 Sept. 2S •• 2°'- '? B. Ru«»ii : g^ « N. McL. Hath..rlaii.l Dec! n.'.'.'.'.".'.'.'. .'...". ,' F«.t. .Sil ft Ft.prr«ec. ' Feet. Ser.-fl. 120 tl llU'll 120(1 inon 101). fi 183' 1 IHI 1 213-H 204 1783 0-,13 0-2S 0-40 0-,M 0-J8 MO 0-90 1-97 222 20S •lot 44- It 8«-4t 111 ot 103«t 12.10 1330 143-0 248- S 269 2 064 0-66 l)-7!) 033 0-S7 0-68 90-»f I6S-3 211-5 422 5 !Vi2-4 137 S M.S'(I 346-2 4117-3 1-22 206 1-21 201 144(1 142 .S 140 l.VI .1 130-0 39S8 441 « 3lft-3 (175-1 4I0')I 1-M 1 93 1 SB .1 63 1 67 ISO 1-90 1 S6 3 46 1 66 654 5 852-6 629-« 2.385-0 886-4 142 .1 13S'.5 132-0 127(1 ll.V(i 461 -0 347-8 Ml-H 279- 1 241-2 2- 10 1-30 1 04 0-82 40 2-01 t 33 1-08 224' 2-30' 967-6 453 1 344-5 229-H »-V8t 151- It 206-2 0-73 2- 10* *.Vew chmin nuie. tli» conditions. ' Daily Gauge Height and Discharge ..f Elbow River at CiilRary, Alta., for Day. Jlini.;t'\ . Febnittr,v . Miin-li April. May GB(«e Die- I Gauge Did. Height charge I Height chantc 11. 12 13 14 I.? . 16 17 18 19 . 20 21,. 22 . 23 24 . .'5 . 28. 2!l :io . Feet. 1-06 0-99 G'90 0-87 1-09 1-12 1-25 1-34 1-19 tlOS tO-90 0-76 0-79 0-74 0-69 0-90 1-01 1-59 1-50 1-60 1-68 1-69 1-72 1-69 1-es I 75 1-64 1-74 1-75 1-76 1-78 I Gauge Dis- I Gauge Di». Gauge Dis- Height^ char,.. [ Height charge Height charge Sec.-ft. 71 65 60 : y. 64 64 : 69 71 63 - 57 51 I 48 j 43 '. 48 Feet. 1-78 1-79 1-80 1-89 I 2-.. ' 1-95 [ 2-03 ' 1-99 1-96 S^'-lt. 73 74 78 79 88 M 91 87 85 1-98 2-02 I 2-03 ! 2-00 20- ,' 2 :i3 2-10 I 2-21 ! 2' 16 I SIO I 90 91 88 95 91 98 110 l(H 212 101 2-23 113 2-27 120 2-19 III 2-16 108 2-20 113 2-23 119 2-27 123 fVet. 2-30 2-26 2-25 2-25 2-28 2-23 i 2-26 2-25 t 2-21 : 2-22 2-17 i 2-0'l I 2-U j 2 ('8 20> ; 2-09 1-9(1 : 1-92 1-88 1-82 ' 2-2(; I or 1-9.1 1 81 l-M 1-70 1-60 1 .« 1-40 90 0-69 fee (t. I 128 I 123 122 I 123 ! 125 121 '. 126 [ 125 I 121 i 12** ! 116 ; 107 114 I I'l7 116 128 118 123 : 124 128 233 191 IW 192 203 193 185 IXD 170 90 : Fwt. 0-55 045 M-42 0-38 .^1 Set- 0-47 i 0-60 I 0-49 0-47 0-67 0-63 I 0-89 I 0-80 I 0-67 0-69 I 0-79 I 0-92 I 0-87 - 0-84 I (I 98 I 1-30 1-43 I 117 i 1-16 I 1-10 1-06 0-99 0-K9 0-8(1 0-73 -ft. 80 79 82 84 102 105 147 143 152 198 188 267 236 19S 203 233 278 26!) 250 302 458 539 , 388 I 383 , 3M I 336 j 306 2«7 236 215 Feel. 0-71 Sec. -ft. 209 ii-'» 201 066 j 196 0-64 I 190 0-73 ■ 215 0-73 0-74 0-78 0-76 j 0-71 i 0-71 i 0-68 0-78 : 1-02 i 0-98 I 1-18 1-97 I 75 1-59 1-40 1-36 1-32 i I 33 I 29 1-28 1-25 1 22 1 22 : 1-43 ! 1-86 ' J.trt ' 215 218 230 224 209 June. Gauge ' Die- Height : charge. Feet. 2-61 2-51 2-37 2-25 2-09 1-83 1-74 1-69 1-65 1-61 200 1-78 201 1-99 rjo 2-21 319 217 302 2-09 1 392 2-02 911 1-9V 750 1-85 ! 641 1-70 ' 520 1 6S 49,5 1-50 470 1-58 477 1-67 ; 452 1-76 1 447 2-40 430 I 413 ! 413 539 829 1.063 1-99 I-9S 2-OG 2-02 2.0S S«..-tt 1,466 1,370 1,244 1,139 1.006 807 743 708 682 655 771 926 1.105 1,071 1.006 930 911 821 7IS 682 641 635 6«S 757 1,270 926 89« 934 •50 974 ■fi f». ■ ^1 'J I . *"■ 1 m It* :.)E- 02 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Daily Gatjqe Height and Discharge of Elbow Riv r at Calgary, Alta., for mi.— Continued. DAT. I i a.. z.. 4 i t 7.. »., «., 10 II. 11 . u.. 14.. U.. M.. 17., M It ». n.. ». s.. M. ».. ».. r ai. July. Oaun Dii- Haight. ehftrft Feet. 2-33 2-31 2' 10 I'M 1 H 1-75 1 70 1 64 1 «1 I'SS 1-48 1 42 l'3i I 31 1-33 I 38 1 U t'33 I 51 1 47 1 41 1 3D I 85 1-59 1 48 1 41 1-45 I '3a 1 31 1 28 12* I Sw.-I(. 1,108 i.iai 1,014 tu 843 750 715 «75 «55 •15 570 533 48* 4*4 m 508 488 477 5M 584 51S 514 882 841 570 528 552 514 484 447 438 Aufiut. Gau* HticEt. Fast. 1 54 efaaias. Oaun Du- Oaan Di*- Gaaa* Heic&t. ehatsB. Hctght. obatts. B«(ht 8m.-(t. 4S0 815 848 785 851 858 1,191 3,159 2,252 1,789 1,548 i,r8 1,182 1,055 934 1,080 I G81 i 771 i 805 I 888 ! 708 i 875 855 750 715 •95 881 (41 Saptambar. Octobar. N'ovembar. Daeambar. Faat. 1-50 1-47 1-45 2-89 2-40 2'25 2' 18 208 1-99 1-93 1-89 1-84 1-77 1-88 1-81 1-58 1'55 1'48 1'4» 1'41 1'38 1-37 1 37 1'35 1'33 1'31 1-32 1-32 1-32 1-31 Sae.-(t. Faat. 583 584 552 1,548 1,270 1,139 1,083 998 928 881 , 851 1-30 1 29 1 32 1-30 1-29 1'28 1-28 1 24 1-21 118 114 814 113 784 : 1-12 702 Ml 855 MO 821 815 570 539 528 501 SOI 489 477 477 470 470 470 MO 108 108 105 105 103 103 104 104 103 1-02 ! l'a2 101 0-99 I 0-98 0'95 Sae.-ft. 458 452 470 458 452 447 I 438 424 408 3:2 m 388 384 359 i 354 354 345 338 332 332 323 ' 323 ■■ 328 I 328 323 319 319 314 308 302 290 Fatt. 0-98 0'93 0'92 0-92 0'90 0-84 0-80 0'49 014 I t t t 2'02< 2' 15 2'48 234 3'35 2'38 2'37 2-24 ! 2'44 3' 18 2 19 2'25 2 28 2'49 220 218 2' 12 Dia- I Oaun { Dia- ehaiia. Haic&t.l obaria Sae.-(t. Faat. 290 282 278 278 170 208 107 115 110 I'll 250 238 157 1'28 218 207 103 85 75 80 100 120 183 377 2»3 300 307 314 ?'05 ^'18 2'28 2'35 2'20 208 206 207 2'35 2'10 1 91 2' 10 231 1'27 MU 1 99 IMI 208 17S 2-23 191 1-98 185 1-78 1 2711 1-79 144 1'79 182 t'78 108 t'78 8ae.-(t. 87 70 91 75 70 91 78 75 84 90 119 148 114 85 97 198 150 81 130 207 100 143 225 107 3N 31 31 208 m m t N'oobwrvatkxi.KauireheiKht ial«rpoUl«< 8.11' 1M.».'< BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e ._ DiscHAROE Me aburemen ts of Elbow Riv er at Calgary, for 1912. 273 Data. Ju. 12 Ju. » Feb. 12 Feb. 24 Mir. g Mar. 23 Apr. 4 May 2 May » May 20 Juae II Joae 24. July 8 July It July M July 31. Auf. 10 Aug. 24. Sept. 7. Sept. 24. Oot. 7 Oot. 22. Nov. 2. Nor. IS. Dee. I«. Hydrofrapher. N. MeL. Sutherlaad H.C. Ritchie F. R. Burfielii H.O. Brown ".'.'.' F. R. Burfield Width. Area of Section. Meaa Velocity. He^. Diacharie. Feet. Sq.ft. Ft. par ne. Feet. 8ec.-ft. I2S 180-75 0-51 1-96 92-3 120 JOt'OI 0-66 2-04 138-98 118 1»4'7 0-66 2-00 129-4 120 l»7-« OS* 1-95 116-13 105 171-2 051 1-84 88-0 104 192 1 0-56 1866 107 5 130 31«5 114 240 361-47 13« 347-8 138 247 481-14 134 312-35 117 2-28 365-99 138 S 3564 1-48 2-52 527-83 133 .%3-2S 1 11 2-22 357-64 139 421-8 209 2-84 881-4 147 8025 S-7D 4-15 2.227-41 14« 547« 3- 16 3-76 1,721-83 14S «5I 4 3-79 4-305 2,470-59 143 435-4 223 3-00 972-72 137 3.W35 1-60 251 564-8S 143 334-2 1 44 2-35 480-41 13« 320-15 1-32 2-32 , 421-32 137 320-4 1 25 2-32 : 400-30 135S 286-57 105 2-16 300-18 13S 298-0 1 10 2-13 326-00 133-5 295-0 0-98 2-10 290-50 12« 251-0 072 1 91 180-40 127 208-4 0-5» 1-97 i 123-00 P/'^^'^^^^yj^ *''^'°"'' ^^° Discharge of Elbow River at Calgary, for 1912. Jaauar>'. Day. February. March. April. May. June. Oai UBUge H<^t 1 Feel. ' 1-9* 2 I'M 3 4 l SIO i ios 447 J -■ >>2« 2-17 2-19 2-15 2-14 214 2 15 3 14 2-14 2-21 2-21 2 17 2 46 3 26 5 .16 ; 4 KM 4-56 4 01 3-59 3 36 j 3 10 2 94 2 79 i 2 72 ; 2 70 '■ 2-59 j j.si ! 2-47 i 2'M 412 877 817 329 305 399 299 305 399 299 342 342 317 520 1.207 4.312 3.4611 2.918 2.024 I.53S 1,306 1.060 916 78t 727 710 6» SH •Oaate heighui were lake* al a dilfeteat lime of day. Meaa daily diaehar«e ia aboat that givaa. t('ha«glB( eoadltioM ', r I ' ■ ^- 274 DEPARTUBNT OF THE INTERIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Daily Gaugb Height and Discharge of Elbow River at Calgary, for 1912.— Concluded. Dat. .'5 IM I. t. 3 4. S « 7.. 8.. t. 10 II.. II.. u.. M M l« . 17 . IS.. I* . 10 II a a.. M.. a a . n.. a.. a.. July. AaiuM. September. October, Gwiie ! Du- Heicnt.iehuie. MCe nfht. Heifl Feet. 8ec.-ft. Feet. a-H 261 in 2-68 SOI I'M iW 4'Sl 4-4« 4'a 4- 16 4'» 4 M 417 3-7t 2-48 3'M 3' 10 3' 12 3- 17 304 I 3 a , 4 10 SOI 630 614 638 761 604 •7« 1.309 1,611 3,008 2,742 2,437 2,24$ 2,309 2,918 2.260 1,710 I,42S 1,207 1.0*0 1.078 1.123 1.006 1.2SS 2.tSS 3,6«0 4'» 2,437 in 1,(88 la i,at lit 1.109 101 m IN »16 2-85 2-75 2-74 2-64 2-61 2-57 2-94 294 2'4» 2-49 297 3-90 2' 46 2-41 2-33 2-38 2-94 2 97 2-92 2-46 2-44 2-37 2-33 2-31 2-41 2-4S 2'40 293 2-98 2-46 2-39 ' ehaiie. Sec.-ft. 838 792 744 683 80* Uwice Du- Gaiin Heifbt. ebarfe. Hei(Et j Dia- Icbaise. Feet. : 9ee.-ft. Feet. 2-39 2-33 2-32 2-3* 2'4t I 2-29 2-32 982 2-40 942 ; 2 41 912 i 2-48 606 : S9C I 920 ! 482 ! 426 i 461 I 982 ! 60* ; 96* 920 ^ 909 i 494 I 4M j 412 482 ' S12 47S 974 614 920 440 i 2-34 I 2-30 i 2-26 3-27 I 3-28 : 2-29 2-29 ' 2-24 ' 2-21 ' 2-20 2'1« 2 31 2-33 ' 2-31 i 2 30 : 2'2« I 2'M 2'M ' 2 31 ! 2 18 410 43* ! 41» 447 909 410 479 482 939 433 406 377 : 3,HI 3»1 ■"3 370 363 342 339 32»! 412 I 436 412 i 409 396 : 377 I 3S* j 342 ' 323 I 2' 18 217 2' 16 2' 19 2' 14 217 2' 16 21* 22* 2-23 220 219 2-24 2'a 2-27 2-27 2-30 2-33 2-2* 2-23 2-29 311 219 2' 14 2 14 2' 18 2 14 2 13 Sec.-tt 323 317 311 309 299 317 311 311 377 39* 339 3N 3*3 370 384 387 409 4a 377 39* 370 ai 309 ao 311 29* 399 287 299 291 November. Deeember. Owiie I Die- | Gmiib [ Hei(bt.| eharte. i Heii^t.j ehaite. Du- Feet. 2 19 2 14 213 213 2' 12 8er.-(t. I Feet. Sec.-ft *1« les 1*3 1*3 160 211 198 2' 10 199 2 11 198 212 160 2' 12 1*0 2 11 198 2 11 1S8 3- 10 19S 2 12 160 2' 10 tss 2- 10 199 207 147 20* 144 2 13 163 206 143 204 la 20* 144 209 142 209 142 302 134 302 134 204 la 203 137 1 M IM 1 94 113 I'M 1'89 1-94 1-9* 1-94 I'M 2-06 203 206 203 2'W I'M ~'01 I « M 90 113 119 no 113 134 144 IM 144 IM la la 132 191 1-97 121 la 82 I'M 77 1-79 74 1 81 80 1-80 77 2' 10 199 2'M 14* 311 198 2 14 1*9 209 192 201 132 1 U 116 1 91 10* 1 71 a 48 ' Ice coMJitiou altar Nov. I . Monthly Discharob of Elbow River at Calgary, for 1912. (DimiMtt area, 4U eqiiuc miUe.) HONTH Jaaiiar> . Febniary riaich. r.. I«n.. Sapiember.. NoTambar.. Daoaokbaf.. UlSTHtROI IN tIttQND-FtlT. Maiinium. .Mininium. .Mean. la lU'O 3000 4000 9(00 4.3120 3.(no aao 9190 4M IMO Id 340 1000 Mil 1800 iiso 299 *14'0 4130 3a ■•«|.n 1130 1U« 3 l»'2 l»'4 aso 4*1 M70 I. (889 U4 9 40l'3 533-2 149-9 117 7 PerSqai Nile. on oa on OM oa I'M 3'» IIS O'M ee» oil OM RCK-Otr. Depth la iaehaa oa Toulin Dralaate Area. Acnt-leat oa 6.SM 017 (.914 0'3I 7,9(« O'M 19,(90 I'll a.S4* 3'1( U,7S9 3'SI 97,203 la M.OM oa a.9n O'U oa ui« (,(» 7.97 1M,I BOW RIVER POWER AVD STORAGE 275 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26e Miscellaneous Discharge Measurements of tributaries of Bow River, by J. C. Keith, in 1909. D*M. Stream. Looftlity. Width. |5J«°°"" , HoraeCreek Sec. 8-28-4-S.. . |2««°£«» G«iid Valley Creek Sec. 24-3«*5.. |5«^2"' i BeaupreCreek Sec. IMIM-S.. g5*»"°»'I Spencer Creek Sec. 17-28-5.5.. I?**""'* I Gho»t River Sec. 24-26-(M.. September* |JacobCreek ' September 10 CrippleCreek Feet. 10 Area o( Discharge, aaetion. 8q..ft. 5-75 7-8 S04 On Stony Indian Ra- serve, near mouth On Stony Indian Ra- 8«>tambarl0 OldJort Creek | of 82;nTli3S."'iie: ■ serve, near mouth 2- 17 1S3. 11.6 1'2« ao« Sec.-h. 6-4 Dry. 0-80 Dry. 1 S8 Dry. 0:3 MISCELLANEOUS MEASUREMENTS. Miscellaneous Discharge Measurements of Nose Creek, near Calgar>-, Alts., in 1909. Data. Jaly 1* SavUmbarl. SaptambarU Hydfosrapher, Locality. J. C. Keith N. W. 13-24-1 J.. do do do do Width. Area ol •actioa. Feet. 1) 9 ii Sq-ft. 19-8 40 4-2 Uiecharte. See.-ft. 23-4 is J 7 MiscBLLANKOUS DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS of Bow River, in 1909 Uydrocrapber. Data. Looality. Width. Area : ol I Diacharte Saptembar 8 J.C.Keith a«vtambarlO do October 20 P.M. Sander. Feet. Road altowaaoe E. of •ae. 34-28-4-5 305 Uorley bridae oa Stony Indiaa Raaerve 1788 Inuka S.A.L.Co., S.E. 31-21-28-4 IK Sq.-lt. I Sec..(t. 813 j 4,017 M« 3,390 887 ; 2,874 DiscHARGB Measurements of Nose Creek, near Calgary, in 1911. Hydrocraphar. Width. Araaoi Seotioa. Meaa I Qaaca Velocity. H^ihi. Diacbarfa. May J8 do tma 8 B.Rwnll July J do 1. M., . U.. , r. ST. Tbomaa.. . Brown t Faat. 180 24 J 23-5 225 I8'9 I4'« Ml 188 188 3q.lt. Ft. pernc. 5-8 108 Jl» 1 68 382 1 82 21- 080 148 044 7» 0'88 8-7 0-81 W.7 O'M 448 0.|1 Faat. S»eM%. 18* 82 200 828 1-88 882 175 174 188 4.4 188 88 1 at 88 Id •■7 t«r *'8 276 DBPARTUEKT OF TBE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Nose Creek, near CalRarv. Alta for 1911. D«T. April. M»y. Juoe. July. aSSi Du- charce. Oman H^t. Oi*- ebane. H^X Die- ehstse. Oaun H^St. Dii- chftrte. Feet. S«s.-ft. Feet. 1-62 IM 1«0 182 I'M 1-70 1'71 I'SS l'«8 l'«3 l'«3 l'«5 1'7« I'SO 1'75 1-80 2'20 2' 10 I'M I'M 1-82 1-73 1'60 1'8S 1-70 l'«8 1'7« 1-88 1'83 1'77 1'75 Sec.-ft. 7-2 7'« t'S 7'2 t'S ll'S 12'7 8-3 10'2 7'« 7'8 8'3 18* 23'« 17'4 23« 8S3 23.. 2«'3 ISO 23S »'4 lis 10' 3 22'4 34'7 27'7 1»'» r Feet. 1'74 1-70 1'78 1'78 1'70 188 1'70 1-76 1'7S 1'73 IN l'«S 1'88 2'3S 230 JIS 1-89 I'M 1 7S I'SS l'S3 I'M I'SS 2'W 2'33 3'2S I'M I'T^ 1'' See.-(t. 18'2 11 S 17'4 18'S lis 10'2 lis I8'8 17'4 ISO lO't 8'3 10'2 1100 1020 77'2 3«'2 376 I7'4 8'3 7'6 «'S 7'» S2'« lOS «3'S 23'8 ISO ISO 17'4 Feet. 1'75 1'73 Its Its See.-(t. 2 17'4 3 IS'O 4 . . 5 • I'CO OS 7 182 , 7'2 8 I'M : t'S » 1'58 Its l't7 I'TO I'tt 1'70 Its l'<3 l'S7 ISO 1'83 1'68 '.'71 1'88 1 «S 1'70 187 I'SS Its 1 W 1' ts 30 2 31 8.« S« ... ] BOW RIVER POWER AyD 8T0RA0E ZH SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Dailt Gauge Height and Discharge of Nose Creek, near Calgary, Alta., for 1911. — Continued. DAT. Auiuat. Septembw. October. November. Gauge < Du- Hei(ht . : chuxe. Gauie i Di*- Uei(bt.icluu«e. Gaute 1 Oil- Heifht charie. Het^ Die- chaiie. 1 Feet. 1 Sec.-ft. I'M : «'S I'M 6'S I'M «'S l'»4 7'9 1'70 ll'S 1'68 10'2 1'72 13'9 1'8S 30'4 l'93 421 1-79 22'4 1'78 : 21-1 l'75 I7'4 I'M 8'9 1'65 8'3 1'70 ll'S 1 7S i 17'4 1-80 23-6 I'-S 17'4 1 75 17 4 I'-l 12'7 1'68 10-2 1'68 10'2 l'«7 9'8 l'«9 109 1'71 12'7 1 75 17 4 1'73 130 1 75 17'4 1 1'70 ll'S 1'68 10-2 l'«5 8'3 Feet. 1 «5 1-«S I'M 1'75 1'7$ 1'70 t'69 1'67 1 65 1'67 1-67 1-98 168 1 67 1'68 1'6S I 64 1'6S 1-65 l'«5 1 M 1-68 1'70 1'69 1'68 168 1'6S 1 65 I'M I'M Sce.-ft. 8-3 8'3 8'9 17' 4 17'4 11-5 10-9 96 8'3 96 9-6 10'2 10' 2 9'6 10-2 83 7'9 8-3 E'S 8'3 8-9 10-2 11-8 10'9 10' 2 8-3 8'3 8'3 8 9 8'9 Feet. 1'6S I'M I'M 1-67 1'6<> I'M 1'95 1'65 1'65 165 165 164 163 1 62 161 160 IM 159 188 159 1.S9 IM 1-62 1 63 1-63 161 161 1'60 1'59 1'59 1-88 Sec.-tt. 83 89 89 96 8-9 89 83 83 83 83 83 72 8-9 Feet. 1-88 188 189 IW 188 188 1-87 187 187 1 87 187 1-87 157 157 187 Seo.-(t. 2 3 4 i ■; < 7 8 9 10 :.::.: ■■ 11 12 , 13 14 :::.:: n ::::.:: i«. 17 18 ; ::: 19 20 '■'■'■'.'.'.■'■'.'■'■'■'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.:.'.]'.'.'. 21 22 23 24 28 ■'■'■'■'■'■^'■^'■'■^^'■'■'.'.'.' '.'..'.'.'.'.'.'..'.]. it 27 28 '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. 29 30 31 i ':' Monthly Discharge of Nose Creek, near Calgcry, Alta., for 1911. (Dreioage area. 'J9i Bquare miles.) Month. April 24-30 May June July Auguat September October November 1-18. Thepe>u(e j DU- Hei Dis- charge. {Heicbt. ' charge. Gsiue Dis- Gauge [ Ois- iight. Rbarge. Height. ! charge. Heii Feet !8ec.-ft. 1-72 1-70 1-68 I'M 1-70 1-70 I'W ! 1-68 1-97 ; 1-67 1-73 1-72 1-74 1-77 1-85 : •8j : -88 '8» , l'3l M3 . 17-7 15.5 13. 9 12.3 15. S ISi 14-7 I3'9 131 13. 1 17-7 Hi US Hi ISi 109 3« 44 40 36 21 17-7 10-9 : 24 32 40 42 62 82 2 II Feet. ; Feet. Gauge Sec.-ft. f, i. ! Sec.-It. 2. 10 2.10 ] 2-12 209 205 2. 02 205 211 2. 14 2' 13 2. 09 2. 03 202 1-98 1-95 I 193 ■' 189 ' 1st : 1-85 i 1-85 I 1.8« ! 1-88 I 194 I 193j 1.92 I 1. 91 1. 90 I 1-87 t 77 77 80 75 08 M 68 78 83 82 75 66 64 57 52 49 42 37 37 3< 36 37 39 48 : 45 43 40 38 34 31 1-87 1-87 ■ '86 186 1-86 185 1.85 1-90 1-94 195 1-99 2. 01 2. 02 2-04 2.03 204 2. 02 2-04 2. 00 l-9« 1. 93 190 1-85 182 180 1-78 1-78 1-79 1. 81 1-80 1-78 29 27 26 35 24 24 30 35 37 43 46 48 51 52 1. 78 I 1-73 1-70 : 1. 63 1. 68 ; 1-74 ' 1.86 189 1-83 < 1-79 1-73 ' 1.75 ' 1. 80 ! 183 ' 174 138 12. 8-7 no 14 4 25 28 22 18- 2 138 15.0 190 22 22 Non.— Shiftiog ooaditiont Sept. 21 to Oct. 51 48 SI 44 38 34 ' 30 1 ... 24 1 21 ,.. .. 190 ' 17-4 17-4 18.2 19-9 190 17-4 h'^} Monthly Discharge of Nose Creek, near Calgary, for 1912. (Drainage area, 284 square miles). .Month. Ddchakoi in Sccond-Fcct. RvN-Owt. Maiinium. ' Minimum. Depth ia Per Square inches on Total ia Mile. Draiaaga Acre-feet. Area. »'*^" M I M. 77.7 • 0.264 JT 2 .li 17-5 0-060 SSJiSir,,:.,,.;;;:::::::::::::;;:::;:::;: g ' ",* , ?A ] tZ Theperiod ' I I 0-06 925 Oil 1,773 0-IS 2,2«4 007 1,041 0-18 »,7»l 0-11 1,6*7 0-21 3,185 0-13 I,»7t OU) 521 1 01 16. ri If; 280 DEPAJtTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 6 GEORQE v., A. 1915 Daily Gauge Heioht and Discharge of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Calgary, Alta., for 1909. I I. 4. i. « 7., 8., (. 10.. n. 12.. M . 14.. 15.. IS . 17.. 18.. 1«.. W.. 21.. 22.. 23.. 24.. 29.. M . 27.. 29.. 30.. DAT. M>y. Jnae. July. August. Saptcmbar. Uun H^(bt. Fwt. 0-00 I'W I'tO 270 2. 70 2-80 280 i'tO 3-10 3.10 3» 3. 40 240 2. 30 2. 20 2. 10 2. 20 230 230 2-30 2-30 200 200 200 2' 10 2' 10 210 2' 10 2' 10 Dii- I Gi uu- Uann i Di«. I Qua luuie.|Hei(bt.; ohaifs. Hnght Sac.-(t. i Faat. Bm.-H. < Fatt. OO I to ' •1 I m i ITS i IM ' IM 213 248 i 248 I 2M 302 . 130 114 i M 8« M I 114 114 114 114 i 73 I 73 I 2.10 2.10 2' 10 2' 10 2-10 2-10 2.10 270 2-80 280 2. SO 2.40 200 1-80 100 1-90 I'M) 1 M ISO ISO ISO ISO ISO ISO , 210 I 73 3-30 86 3-20 W 1»0 8« 1-70 W 1-70 88 j 88 8« I 8« 8« 86 17S 106 186 , W 130 i 73 SO 31 24 ' 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 ; 24 86 I 284 266 61 40 40 2-00 200 ISO ISO 1-40 1-30 1-60 I'OO 120 I'M I'M 1-80 1-80 1-80 1-80 2-10 2-10 2-00 2-20 270 3-80 3. SO 330 3. SO 390 380 3. SO i 360 3. 70 3. 80 3'SO Di*- I Qaon ] Dii- Quia* : Di«- ehaite. Heicht. charfe. Height, charge. Oetobar. See.-(t. Feet. 73 73 24 24 17 86 73 M 17* 320 320 320 320 320 320 320 338 356 374 320 I Gauge Bei^t. Di» charge. 3. 60 3-60 3.50 3.50 3-20 320 2'90 320 3-90 3-90 3.90 3. 90 3. 90 2.M ISO I-SO : Sec.^t. Feet. Seo.-ft. I Feet. Sec.Jt. 390 I 3-90 J 390 ; 3-40 : 3-40 ' 320 320 320 302 302 12 340 302 31 340 302 61 3-40 302 61 390 920 61 360 338 81 3 60 338 90 3-60 338 SO 3-60 338 SO 3-60 338 50 3-60 338 320 266 266 213 266 320 320 . 320 320 320 213 24 '■ 24 I 190 , 3-90 ' 3-SO 4-tO /,-30 4-10 1-SO IIP 3-20 3-20 3-50 300 2-80 3-10 3-20 3-00 3-20 300 3-20 3-20 3-20 I 2-90 1-60 2-30 3-20 320 3-20 2-60 2-40 1-70 24 320 320 430 ! 468 j 430 I 61 3 I 266 \ 266 I 320 I 230 196 1 248 266 ; 230 i 266 230 26« 266 213 31 114 266 266 266 162 130 40 3-20 I 3-20 I 3-20 \ 2- 10 2.10 2-10 2-10 2-10 2-10 1-80 j 140 ' 1-30 I 1-20 120 j 120 I 1-20 1-20 I 1-20 I 1-00 j 1-00 100 1-00 0-90 0-90 0-90 I 090 ; 0-80 ' 0-80 ' 080 i 0-80 I 080 j 266 266 266 86 86 86 86 86 86 90 Discharge Measurements of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Calgary, Alta., in 1908-1909. Date Hydrograpbcr. Width ^"'' "' *''•" Gauge . Dis- section, velocity. height. charge. 1008. M«y 12 ; H. R. Carscallen July 22 Ao September 2 Jo October 1 1 H. C. Ritchie 19U9. I •!«»ell P. M. Sauder. Juim2S. July 3 July 17 August 6 August 30 September 18 . . J. C. Keith, do do do do do Feet. Sq. It. Ft. per sec. Feet. 4«-S 84 74 2-19 46-5 60 0-27 1-625 465 62 0-26 1-64 U-O 103 0-99 2-4S 51-5 111 1-27 2-47 450 62 0-36 147 48-0 84 0-82 1-975 90-0 97 0-98 2-20 960 159 189 340 965 169 1-92 3-48 45-5 179 1»4 3-70 See.-ft. 63 16 IS-I 98 141 22 69 96 301 318 341 BOW RtTER POWER AND STOR.IOE 281 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 29a Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Calgary, Alta., for 1908. Discharge Measurements of Cunadian Pacific near Calgary, in 1910. Date. Hydrographer. May 9 May 21 June 15. June 27. Julv 13 Aug. 8. Aug. 27. .Sept. 10 Oct. .1 Oct. 14 J. C. Keith ■Jo do do do do do do H. H. Carsor do Railway Company's Canal Width. Feet. Area of section. Mean velocity. •Sq. ft. [ Ft. peraec. MS 156. e < 1-78 635 70-02 i 2-2 SS'O 133-27 1 1-54 5.5.5 2no.»s ! 215 560 228-46 1 2- 1.1 mu 220-78 2-220 56 184-73 , 1-87 SS'S 150-32 1 1-54 60-7 206 79 1-9 U-O 5-48 : 0651 hci'gTt' Discharge. Feet. 24 1-5S 2-0 3 3 3-64 3 6 2-7 2 245 3-01 0-45 Sec.-ft. 279-46 154-18 2(»-25 432-28 486-75 491--. 343-45 231-7 391-94 3-S7 '•■■I 9K DEPABTHtSVT OF THE lyTKRiOR 5 QEORQE v., A. 191S Daily Gauob Hkioht and Dibchargb of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Calgary, for 1910. April. May. imw. .15 . DAT. Heicht. FMt. 1., 2.. 3.. 4.. S « . 7.. 8 . » . 10.. 11 . u . 13 M U . 1« 17 18 . 1» 20 . Oi>- I Owipa Di>- Uauce Dia- oliac|*.,H«(ht. oharn iHeicht. oharie. 8M.-(t. I FMt. Sn.-tt. I Fnt. i 8ee.-(t. 21 22 23 24 2S 27 28. 2*. 30. 1-8 1-8 \i 1'8S I8« 18« 201 1«3 1-8 1'8 1-7S 1-7 17 1-7 1-7S 1 « 2'3S 2-4 IW , 186 I 178 ■ 171 171 171 178 101 271 27S 20 1'2S 0-25 OU 1-3 i 16 , 17 ' 1-7 '7 ; 1-7 141 141 141 127 1-5 141 i 15 141 15 141 l'» 301 i l'» 201 2-2 247 ' 22 247 22 247 20 216 20 216 20 216 2-0 216 2-7 I 2-7 ' 0-0 ;. 1-85 1.6 I 20 I 2-2 2-2 I 2-5 ' 265 I 306 I 3-3 I 3-3 I 3-3 i 3-35 I 216 106 28 113 166 171 171 171 171 1-65 163 1-8 186 1-6 isa : 205 224 IS 141 21 231 15 141 21 231 IS 141 1 20 216 328 IM 156 216 247 247 ;iM 320 433 432 43i 441 283 BOW SITER POWER ANO STORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Caisarv.fnr iQin r«_j-- i ^ ^^yauy a 9 10. II.. 12.. 13.. 14.. IS . 17., 18.. 19 . 20.. 21 22.. 23.. 24.. 2S.. 2« . 27 . 28.. 2«.. 30., _-_... „„„ ^.ovunnuK oi ^anaoian racinc Canal near Calgary, for 1910.— Continued. Dav. July. Aiidut. ■September. October. Onim Di«- O urn Height, cb^rta. Kei(ht. Die- : Qwic charge. iHeico chargu Heigl Gaiige light. Die- charge. Feet. |8ec,-h. Feet. 3-4 I 341 ' 3'« 3'» 4 IS 4 3 4 3 4-3 43 4.3 j 40 3-7 3-7 3'8S 4-3 i 4-5 ! 4 3S : 4-3 I 3-8 i 3-7 i 3-7 I 3-7 30 3-8 , 405 , 40 ' 41 : 403 : 40 I 3-8 i 449 4SN 48S S39 S86 61S ' «1S «1S 61S «1S SS8 903 S03 S30 <1S 6S3 «2S «15 921 S03 S03 S03 48S .Ul 3«7 SS8 S77 S67 SS8 521 S21 38 38 3-6 3.S 3.« 3-6 3.« 3-6 3.« 36 309 254 253 2. 25 2. 25 2-2 20 2- 15 23 2-25 2-2 22 2.3S 2.« 2. OS 2-7 3-05 35 30 30 3-0 8ec.-ft. Faet. 8ec,-ft. Feet. Sec,-ft Ml 2-3 2«3 277 34i, S21 ! 23 2«3 2-85 354 4M j 2-25 285 2-9 m 4M 2M 271 30 379 485 2 3S 271 2.«5 3» 485 ; 2.3S 271 2. 15 240 485 2,3 203 1,«2 15, 488 1 2.3 2«3 .80 4« 48S I 2-3 283 55 I? 48S i 23 2«3 35 39S ?.3S 271 302 2i$ 268 300 i.gs 1«4 . 2M 1-0 72 M-' 1-0 72 ..'..'.'.'.'.'.'.'."'.'.[ 247 -92 62 216 1 -93 63 240 i .95 66 26.1 ! 1-8 18« 2SS i 2-52 299 ....:;:. 247 ! 2-38 276 247 I 2-5 295 ' " ". 271 20 216 312 1 2-0 216 320 j 2-0 iK '..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' [ 328 I 20 216 388 l-O" 212 467 I 1-95 2(19 379 i 2.34 271 ! 379 ; 2-75 337 ! ...:'.'.'.'.'.'.]'. '79 i I.. . ' ' Canal cloeed for the Monthly Discharge of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Calgary, for 1910. DtaCBAROI IS SICOND-Fl Month. Maximum, j Minimum. Mean. Total - DiKharf^ in acre-reet .4pril (27-30)... .May June July .^uguat Heptember October (1-10). 201 297 432 6S3 S21 337 379 186 141 449 216 62 191. 5 184. 3 228-2 551. 6 366.7 221. 1 221-7 1.S19 11.333 13,578 33,918 22,S47 12, OSS 4,396 99,346 I 11 ai4 DBPARTMBJfT OF THE INTERIOR ■i'H PI 5 QEORQE v., A. 1015 DiBCHARoa MBASVRBMaNTB of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Calgary. Alta., for 1911. D«te. j i Hydmnplwr. Width. An*a( Section. .» City. RelfEt- Dieebarfr. Mm 5 .......'. ' H.C.Ritchie do Feet. 630 845 443 330 U-3 M-4 48-8 Ml MO 838 48-8 87-3 130 « 101-2 U-8 123-3 75-8 Ft. periee. 2-38 2-47 l-2« 1-84 2-11 1-44 1-n 2-M 1-81 Feet. i:87 2-80 8-7» 2-80 2-00 3-3« 2-40 8ie.-(t. lM-3* 213-1* M»y..l8 June « July 10 Aui. 4 Aug. 94 Sept. IS Sept. 22 do B. Rn«M.. do 161-1 401 -tt l48-3t 70-8 288-8 H.T.ThomM . ... H. Brown do L. R. Braraton 122-3 _ Water wae tamed into the oaani lor a lew dayi in April to fill the pool in the caaal. ; Oaoiinc made at a bridge (No. 1.) on the north side o( Sec. 38, Tp. 23, Rce. 1, W. Sth Mer. ' Gauiinc made at a wading netioa near the iatali in the caaal. Daily Gauge Height and Discharge of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Calgary, Alta., for 1911. April. Hay. June. Dat. July. August. September. Gauge I Dis- Gauge ! Die- Gauge Dis* . Gauge | Dis> Gauge Dts- Gauge Die- Height. | charge. Height. I charge. Height, charge, i Height { charge. 'Height, charge. Height, charge. Feet. I 9ec,-tt. Feet. 1 2-10 2 3-40 3 3-10 4 3-00 8 3-00 6 3-00 7 3-00 g 3-00 9 3-00 10 3-00 U 300 12 2-80 13 2-80 14 2-70 IS a-ss 16 2-45 17 2-25 IS 2-18 19 1-70 20 2.«5 21 ' 2-60 22 2-60 23 i 2.25 24 2-20 23 2-20 26 2-20 27 2.22 28 2-20 29 2-20 30 1-65 39 2-20 31 2.30 I Sec.^tt. I 83 I 132 j 248 228 228 228 228 228 228 Feet. Sec.-lt. Feet. 2. 40 2.43 2-47 2-87 2-57 2-57 257 2-57 2. 63 2-50 122 127 •133 t202 149 149 149 149 141 138 3. IS 3. 15 3-15 3. 15 3- 15 315 3' 10 3. 00 300 3-75 Sec.-It. 259 259 259 259 259 259 Feet. See.-It. Feet. 2-80 2-60 2-60 2-60 2-60 2-75 248 I 285 228 ! 2-80 228 j 2. 80 402 ' 275 154 154 154 154 154 180 198 189 189 180 225 230 2. 35 2-8U 3-90 3-90 3-85 3-50 290 2-85 Sec.-ft. 101 108 115 415 441 441 428 340 208 198 228 2-58 151 3. 85 428 2-75 180 2-85 198 189 258 148 3-60 364 2-75 180 2-85 198 154 2-70 171 3-60 364 2-80 189 310 248 171 2-90 208 3. 40 316 2-90 208 315 259 146 2-95 218 3-40 316 2-80 : 189 315 259 130 2. 95 218 340 316 260 154 300 228 101 3.55 253 3.45 328 250 138 2. 85 198 89 3-53 347 345 328 2-50 . 138 285 198 43 3-53 347 3 45 328 2-50 138 2-85 198 102 3-80 415 3-45 328 2-50 138 2-80 189 tS4 3-80 415 3 45 328 2-50 13S 2-50 138 IM 3.95 454 3'OU 228 2-45 130 240 122 101 3 95 4M 300 228 245 130 2-40 122 a.i 4-00 487 3 00 228 2-25 101 2-40 122 95 345 328 2 93 218 2-20 95 2-40 122 95 3-45 328 2-90 208 2-20 95 3. 80 41.51 97 3-45 328 2-70 171 2-20 95 3. 85 4281 95 3-45 328 2-70 171 2-20 95 075 000 95 3-20 3-20 270 270 2-70 260 2-80 171 154 154 200 2-00 2-00 ' 7t 71 71 95 108 •Openrd one patn at 700 p.m. fCloaed one gate at S-30 p ra. zWat«r shut ofT at intiiko for the season. Note— Water wiw turned into the canal for a few days about the middle of April to fill the pool in the can;il. Can:U was opened for the irrigation neason on April 30. Gauge heights from April 30 to May 17 were interpolated from obscr vation.1 made at bridge No. 2. BOW RIVKU POWER AND STORAOE 285 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25* Monthly Dibchabob of Canadian Pacific Railway Company's Canal near Calgary, Alta., for 1911. DUTHAIOI IN ScrO!-FUT. Meimi. M«iimufn. Minimum. Moaa. April (30). J^ '•ly Aiiciilt B^itemlMr (1-28).. 39 248 4«7 438 208 441 The period (April 30 to Sept. 38). . TotiU DiflchATge iaure^eet. N 41 m 184 71 39 110 2S( 2(9 144 230 77 9,» 15.211 16,540 8,854 12, n4 U.TDI Discharge Measurements of C.P.I'.. Main Canal "A" at Bridne No 1 in 1912. 1:1;^^ " — - - ■ - - — Dmto. Hydrographer. Width. Area a( Section. Mean Velocity. Gauce Heii[ht. DiKharse. M.y 4 .... H.C. Hitchie Feet. 495 47-5 55-5 5«-6 570 58-5 550 550 54-5 59-5 53-5 590 Sq.ft. 79-5 483 118-2 118-3 120-2 142-4 118-4 114-2 113-2 167-4 10«-4 163-5 Ft. per sec. 1 03 0-90 1-25 1 54 1-54 1-61 1-52 1-42 1-47 1-91 133 1-80 1 1 Feet. 2 06 1-82 261 2-75 2-85 3-85 2-75 264 2-66 3-6« 2-10 3 54 1-10 .Sec.-tt. May 8 . . . . F. R. Burfield 81-35 M»y 25 . . . . do 61- 42 Joe 10 do 148 39 In* 30 do 181-84 J«ly 10 do 185-87 July 17 do 214 5 July 30 ...1 do 180-01 Aut. 9 do 161-81 Aut. 23 s«.t. - do do 320-23 oeiit. ii do Oct. 5 An 293-26 ' ~ Nil. Discharge Measurements of C.P.R. Main Canal "A" at Bridge No 3 in 1912. ■ ' Data. Hydrographer. JUy 4 H. May I ! F. May 25 Jnaa 10 \ Juae 30 July 10 July 17 July 30 A»«- » i Aug. 23 Sept. 7 Sept. 21 1 25e— 20 C. Ritchie R.Buraeld do I do do ' do I do do do i do do do Width. Feet. 48-0 425 50-0 525 52-3 53-0 53-.'S •1-0 2-5 ait 51-5 55-5 j Area Mean , of Section. Velocity. Gauge Height. ' Diecharge. 63-9 42-3 928 96-8 103-4 121-9 101-7 95-8 97-1 150-9 93 1 142-0 1-52 0-96 1-82 2-03 203 1-91 1-94 1-89 1-75 2-22 1-68 205 I Sq. (t. Ft. per aec. ' Feet. Sec.-tt. 97-19 ; 39-76 ; 168-60 ' 196-88 2-97 I 208-26 3-02 i 233-35 I 2-85 I 197-59 2-75 ! 171-26 2-St 169.91 3-77 335-59 2-75 156-51 3 5S 291-51 i* ■ll w 286 DEPARTMBNT OP THE IXTERIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1915 T^AiLY Gauge Height and Dischargib of C.P.R. Main Canal "A" near Calgary, for 1912. April. DAT. Oauie I Dia- HMcht. chant' Fwt. 1.. 1.. 1 . 4.. S.. t.. 7.. <.. • .. 10.. 11.. 12.. U.. 14 M 14 . n . II 1*. . ».. n . a., n . at... 2t M... «... M... 1*... IB . Sw.ft I'M 210 in lU i-K 100 100 100 12 104 41 144 144 217 117 217 May. Ciaiue Dia. leicht. eharte I'aet. Sw.-rt. ISO im i¥> i» I'M I'M 1-70 2' 10 2' 10 230 2-30 2-40 2'«a 2'Sa 2-70 270 2-70 2'M 2-40 2-40 2'40 2-90 210 2'W 2'W 240 240 2 4« 2'4S ?40 245 247 132 132 118 71 71 s: »4 94 118 Jane. Gaiice Dia- Heifht. chaiie. Fast. 24S 2-40 2'45 3-00 300 240 2'M 2-80 2'M 2;o 144 144 144 144 144 140 147 167 140 147 ' 118 3 IS 132 320 1 112 3-20 144 1-40 174 320 174 3' 10 174 2-70 j 144 2'70 i 144 2'70 1 132 2M : 132 210 210 110 3-70 400 4 to 4' 10 3-40 3' 10 3' 10 July. Ausuat. Gaun Oia- Qauia Dia- Baicht. ehaifa. Haigfat. ehaifa. 8ae.-Jt. Faet. Sae.-ft. FaM. 147 140 147 217 217 202 202 188 202 174 240 247 247 m 247 232 174 174 174 140 140 188 212 322 184 »4 307 232 232 1 3' 10 1 3'On 1 2'M 1 2'M 3'W 2'M 2M 3'm 2'M 2-80 i 2'70 1 2-70 2'70 i 2'70 2-70 ! 2-70 1 2'70 1 2-75 2-70 2'7J 2-90 2-80 2'SO 2'W 2'W 2;o 2'M 2 W 2'W 2'W >'« 232 217 202 302 217 202 202 217 202 174 174 174 174 174 174 174 181 174 181 144 144 144 144 174 IW IM 144 144 140 Savtambar. Qaiiaa HaiiiEt 8as.-(t. 1» 144 2W 144 2'W 144 I'W 144 210 IW I'M 2'W 2'W 2'W 2'W 300 100 100 I'OO 100 IW IW 144 144 IW 217 217 217 117 217 I'M 112 I W 242 I'M , 242 I'W ; 242 I'W , 242 110 110 IW I' 10 110 2'M 1 W 2' 10 2' 10 2' 10 2 to 212 212 242 212 212 102 181 •4 •« 14 Faat. 2-40 2'M 2'W 2'W 2'W 2'W 2'W 2W I'W 2-70 IW 4'm 3'M 2'W 2'M 2'M 3'W 3'M I'W I'W 1 W I'W I'W 3'W I'W 110 I 10 1 IS Dia- ehana. Sae.-ft. 132 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 174 ! 242 i 348 217 188 ; 203 i 202 I 21; I 242 I 2S2 2*2 i 2«2 I 242 2«2 I 242 i '" i 232 I 232 't 44 'Haadcataa ooaaad. tHaadvtaacloMd: Monthly Dwchabqb of C.P.R. Main Canal "\" near Calgary, for 1912. DBouaaa m SKom-Ttm. RoicOfr. Mowm MHiimum. Uintmum. M«u Per Square Mila. Aaril (21-30) . . &■::::;:■ July .*■€<«., »<««tambfr (l-H) ihf 217 247 3M 212 242 344 41 II IW 144 »4 44 140 lU 224 I7t IN 210 Uapthin laehca on Total in Dralaaio Aera-faat. Am*. 1.1» u*;S n.r- }}J U.4M UUW IHVEH POWER A\n STOKAGE 287 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Daily Discharge of Bow River from records'at Morley and Horseshoe Falls. 1910. Day. Jm. I F*. j JIanfa. April May. Jw. 1 , See.-h. 2 ! 3 4 4 1 « 7 8 8 10 11 12 13 li'.'.'.'.'.'.W'.'.l'. 1> 1« 17 18 I» » 1 i 21 »7I« a a a » Sec -ft. MS* «U* I.ISO* 813* TdO* t.«48* 7»5' 828* I.4M* 907 • 7M« 802* 639- 6»9* 682* 738« 7M' 72»» •75* 2S 27 21. a .1... »72' 9«c..(t. »4»' 843* 790* I. IMS' i.nss* 875' ((33* 7M' »7»* I. 108* 1.011' I.IIO" I.OIO* »14' :8«' 812* *^iohar^i horn nwriia k<*t by th* Caliary Po.er Co at Hormahoe Falli Th. nmaiadar ar. from record, of the IrrVk» Branch "kenTIKiey ;^7• w* 802* 806' 8J7' 800' 1,447* 1.2«2* 1.021* I.43S* 1.738* 1.78I* 1.701' I. (to* 2.7M* 8,350 10. MB ia,«4e T.M 8w.-ft. •,»1U 7.860 7.1M e,«3S 8.118 «,S00 7.830 8.179 7.880 -.8*0 »,070 12,475 12,680 10,640 10,040 11,245 11,880 13,060 11,245 11,245 12,680 11,450 «.840 8,ttS 7,830 8.700 8,840 10,(40 10,(40 8.840 i III u f III t I! m 25e -2(H - 288 DEPARTUENT OF THE INTESIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 191S Daily Discharge of Bow River from records at Morley and Horseshoe Falls, 1910.— Continued. Day. 2 4 < 5 :.:::. ;:;:::;;::::::::;:'":::::':'::j • 1 7 1 f i 10 1 It 11 II 14. I( M IT II . n M tl. n. n.. M SI . M r . n.. My. A«f. 8«l>t. Get. Nov. Dm. Sm.-ft. 8M.-tt. 8M.-lt. BteM. 8ec.-tt. See.-rt. •,25t •,440 8,330 8,l7i •.000 5.115 5,070 4.850 4.740 5,411 t.toi 1,8M a, (48 1,790 1.(35 1,510 3.410 1.170 3,170 1,295 1 1.888 i.aw 1,880 1,130 l,84« 1,540* 1,583* 1,515* 1,410* 1,011* 8.000 7,830 8,000 8,l7t 7.830 •,500 •,•35 •,500 •,IIS •,II5 3.115 3.110 i.on 2.705 1,580 3.110 2,370 2,520 2.445 2.580 1.874 1.790 2,322* 2.2«7* 2.283* 1,^17* 1,497* •.••3* l,a08* 1,537* 7.830 8.175 8,700 9.255 9,255 5,875 5,875 5,7«0 5,«45 5,530 2,731 2.5«8 2.552 2.475 2,475 2,8iO 3.935 2.755 2.799 2,000 2.284* 2.238* 2,230* 2,010* 2,070* 1,4«2* 1.80O* 1,452* 1.478* 1.40O* «,M0 9,070 (,440 8,885 8,175 5,300 4.940 4,740 4.«30 4,410 2,520 3,731 2,755 2,850 2.935 2,«00 2,850 2.98« 2.884 2.748 2.038* l.7«5* 1,7«5* 1,788* 1,902* 1.420* 1,500* 1,485* 1,37«* i.no* 7,830 7,0«> 7,340 7,060 «,240 4,410 4,305 4,300 4,0*5 3,085 2,901 3,030 3.09« 2,M)I 3,030 2.«ao 2.800 2,510 3.430 3.445 2,053* 1,920* 1,877* 1,837* 1,500* 1,430* 1,240* 1.2«2* l,«12* 1.340* 0,370 5,«00 5,700 ; 5.«n ! 5, (31 ' 3.485 , 3,30t 3,306 3,115 3.<00 2,»00 1.7^5 1.500 l.SK 1 2.4«0 2.37" 2,2«5 1.I40 1.070 3.000 1,315* 1,340* 1,373* : 382* l.tCf 1,580* 1,455* 1,317' 1,417- 1.373* 5.«^0 I 3. (53 .. . 1 1.973 I.t04* *Di(elwrK rrom mnrda o( the C»lmry Ptnrar Co., HorMaho* Fitli. Ukn at Morir) Bridtc. The nmaiadcr are Irriittioa Braaeh near da 15 l8. ds BOW RITER POWER AKD STORAGE i 289 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se Daily Discharge of Bow River from records at Morley and Horseshoe Falls, 1911. 1.. 2.. 3.. 4.. i.. ».. 7.. ».. ».. 10 . II 12 M. 14.. IS 17. 18. I«. 20 21. 22 23.. 24 . 28 28 27 28 . 29.. 10.. See.-rt. 823* 833* U2> 1,117* 1,380* 1,230 1,310* 1,243* 770* 7»8* 936* Fab. Uuch. April. May. Juw. 8M 880 848 180 188 1.120* 1,345* 880* Stt.-lt. 7»* 780* 784* 783* 780* 740* 784* 7J0* 784* 818* 840* 800* 780* 784* 780* 710* 73»* 700* 730* 730* TOO* 710* 800* 880* 690* 720* 728* 720* Seed. TIO* 710* 730* 720* 722* 722* 788* 775* 775* 766* 740* 740* 735* 778* 780* 810* 725* 80O* 900* 865* 830* 902* Ri5* 880* 935* 750* 750* 810* 880* 855* 855* 8M.-(t. 994 1 670 ! 670 i 670 1 626* , 808 674 708 1 788 1 "^ 774 755 755 790 776 790 832 790 830 870 (30 1.(62 (42* 1,100 1,190 1,140 1,210 1.190 Sw.-ft. 1,240 1,317 1,422 1,470 1,720 2.160 2,010 3,010 3,190* 1,815* 1.935 2.010 2,015 2,010 1,(35 2,240 1.940* 1.930* 3.120* 2,200* 2,200* 2,140* 2.160* i.l30* 2,100* 3,130* 2.180* 2.337* 2,2(0* 2,377* SM.-rt 3,698* 5,207* 7,240* 7,370* 6,839* 6,548* 6.430* 5,815* 5,990* 6,470* 7,150* 8.490* 10,443* 12.375* 13.043* 13. 189* 13. 106* 12.695* 11.680* 11,(60* n.475* 11.780* 13.820* 14, 770* 12,(25* 11.725' 11. (M* 13.014* 11.700* 11,640* ti ■ r ' if •DiMhwfM Inm Calfvy Power Co. rmonla Ukw at Horwtho* FMr. 290 UEPXRTMENT OF TBE INTERIOR 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 Daily Discharge of Bow River at Horseshoe Falls from Calgary Power Co records, 1911. D«y. 1 2 1 3 : i 4 1 t ' < 7. ..( « t 10 ::■■: , 11 ,.. 12 IS 14 u W, ■. ir. w. i« » ji..' . . t3 '* U'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'-'. » tl It " Jt SO July. I Aut. Seo.-ft. it.tm II. sm 11,300 10.000 9.329 9.313 9,108 9.113 S,67J S.341 r.9.V) 7.702 fl.lWO .i.S40 .5. MO .5.990 A.M2 «.S9a 6.S3fl a.ito 6.(»0 .\.9.VI .f.93U .5.790 .5. ,6S .i.940 6.400 .5.915 .5.523 .5.1*) .5.21.5 Sec.-ft. 3,130 S.lDS 9,370 £.970 9.889 9,590 9,820 9,800 9,«29 9,4<0 9.370 4.980 4.890 4,710 4,930 4,840 4.780 4,«70 4.1)90 4,930 4,49(1 4.479 4.399 4.. 399 4.310 4.274 4.3R9 4.390 4.420 ' 499 Sept. Sec.-lt. 4,900 4.800 9.IU0 1,900 4,930 4,279 4,100 4.690 3.700 3.700 3.891) 3.690 3.940 3.490 3.39r) 3.279 3. 190 2,991) 2.87.5 2.S7S 2.790 2.571) 2. .5911 2..5nK 2.440 2.3V) 2.. 1511 2.3(") Oct. f 9«ll 949 920 890 911) 870 8SI 8«l> 835 790 8.15 810 801) 885 790 725 73.5 740 725 675 663 675 BOW RIVER POWER A\D STORAGE 291 SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26e Daily Discharge Bow River at Horseshoe Falls from records of C P Co 1912. Day. I 2.. 3. 4. S. « 7. 8. ».. 10, 11.. 12.. 13.. 14.. 13.. 18.. 1«.. 20.. 21.. •li.. 21.. 24.. a.. ■it. 27. 30. 31.. Januao'. February. March. April. May. Junt> Sec.-(t. Sec.-ft. Sec.-tt. Sec.-ft. Sec.-tt. S«.-tl 08} 710 700 M7 730 780 780 7W 75S 750 750 7W 810 820 790 780 7ao 890 82U 842 810 790 830 810 8211 784 770 7M 780 785 780 760 765 775 790 800 755 7«3 775 78U 770 790 800 780 780 735 790 790 755 780 7711 755 72S 6«l 6«2 672 677 684 692 69S 699 644 708 708 710 704 707 718 709 705 706 709 707 707 704 705 702 700 702 7U3 704 771 731 702 763 780 765 743 720 762 757 802 825 777 795 814 687 722 727 724 737 750 739 704 767 777 754 777 784 819 792 837 855 842 832 868 1,390 1,1»4 1,381 1,512 1,788 2,317 3,106 4,542 4,467 4,370 4.356 3,420 .1.054 2.930 2,868 2,754 2,687 2,501 2,401 2.»4« 3,807 4.858 4,971 9,304 9.528 8.007 8,871 10.671 11,106 10,616 10,639 lU,t«4 2,905 10.378 2,825 10,128 2,752 9.494 2,679 9,49l> 3,334 9.759 4,166 9,318 4.646 , 9,230 5,208 9.2«4 5,040 9.139 4,932 H.439 li 'if MJ ' r, » I'. i • if; I i ■ I 292 DEPARTMENT OF THE IKTESIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1916 Daily Discharge Bow River at Honeshoe Falls from records of C P- Co 1912. II., 19.. M.. 14.. 15 . 16 . ».. 18 . I« 20.. JI . 23 ».. S: M . 27.. 2S . 2t 30.. U.. .•SO .no ,no .(00 8*0 ,2M ,000 000 8M 8«0 MO MO (30 430 MO 800 300 300 100 TOO 730 380 1,130 1,050 1,020 1,050 1,120 1,020 1,030 1,020 1,030 1,000 1,020 1,101 1,150 3*0 1,140 1,021) 1,010 1,003 BOW RITER POWER 4.V/) STOKAOE S99 SESSIONAL PAPER No. .?5e Daily Discharge Bow River at Horseshoe Falls from records of C.P.R. Co., 1913. Day. Janiury. February, i March. II 12 13.. 14 IS 1« 17 18 1» SO 21.. 22.. 23 :4.. 2S H 3(1 3) c.-It. 920 »S0 •40 920 700 •80 700 730 720 (90 720 730 810 8t0 790 7J0 780 710 8«0 800 815 810 •10 •10 no 80O 820 •40 •20 •40 See.-It. •on 800 820 ««0 870 «10 830 740 730 740 7«0 780 820 880 880 800 800 80O TOO 820 810 715 880 725 •80 •30 •10 530 8«e.-(t. 800 870 800 800 820 880 900 920 820 880 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e A. 1915 tti ■ APPENDIX VIII. PRECIPITATION DATA. 295 6 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« A. 1915 PRECIPITATION TABLES. Table No. 1.— Year 1911-12. M.'NTH. Banit. Jt'MPiNa Pond. Caloabt. October November December January February March April May June July AuEuat S^tember Total Precipitation. Precipitation. ' Precipitation. Inchoe O'Sfl Inches. Inches. SI 0-61 0-08 |.(I4 |.04 0-94 008 0-20 0-34 205 1-34 106 302 903 3 04 1-03 2003 1-42 4-31 5'M 2-75 2-80 20-55 Mean for years 1903-11. at Banff, 17-89 inches. Mean (or 27 ypHri at Calijary, 16-11 inches. Mean for 20 years at Banff. 19-13 inches. Table No. 2.— Year 1910-11. Month. BANrr. JcupiNO Pond. Caioart. Precipitation. Precipitation. Preripitatioo. October Inches. 1-36 099 0-90 3 12 0-65 0-54 1-15 1 36 2-84 1-38 3-7« 1-14 Inches. 0-49 1 0-23 ' 0-16 0-75 1 0-21 0-65 1 010 : 2-82 3-05 2-64 1 Inches. 0-48 0-84 017 0-44 0-56 104 l-0« 5-03 263 J17 4-3« C-89 Norember Deoombe: January Febniary March April Miy Juni July August 19-19 1110 1 1»I7 i I Table No. 3.— Year 1909-10 Month. BANrr. JnuFiNo Pond. Caloabt. October November December January February March April Y^ JvM July Ancuit S^tember Total Precipitatim. ! 297 ui ii 29B DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Table No. 4.— Year 1908-09. 5 GEORGE v., A. 1915 B»xrr. JmnNo Po.nb Cauiart. Month. Praeipiution Praripitdion. Prrcipitaticid. , : Table No. 5 —Year 1907-08. Month. Basft. IJciinNO Pond.! Cmoart. Pracipitation. : Prvcipiution. i PnTipitation. October November December Jemiary February Manih.. ^::.:::. Joe July Aufuit September Total. Inehee. lechee Inchea. OM 021 nis 1-22 030 008 Ml 034 O'ln oin 018 008 103 013 0'2» 1 58 1-70 OSS IM 097 0.87 4 14 4 0« 4'5» 2.6! 044 72« l-M M8 1-7,^ 174 2«7 1 52 1-41 om 058 1862 It' 14 17-80 Table No. 6.— Year 1906-07. I Bantf. Month. Precipitation. October. ... November. , December. . Jaauarv Februarjv . Manb.. . . ■ ril as.' J«»>- Jaae July Aocnit September.. Total. Inchefl. in 0-87 1-80 )«4 OS* l'5i 1-72 3.3S 2. 83 1-90 4'2< 2-60 23-77 JcvriNO Pond. C^Lo^RT. Precipiution. Precipitation. Inchee. Inchee. 082 1-20 n-00 0-40 0-20 0-7« 1-7II 104 3-7« 085 334 1-20 i5>3a BOW RIVER POWER AND 8T0RA0E SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« Table No. 7.— Year 1905-06. 299 MOMTR. Bum. JimriNa Pond.i CALotRr Pneipiutioo. Precipitatioa. ' Praeipiutir October Inebea. November I-M December 0-44 Juramry 0.44 February [ 0-77 -March 0-40 April 0- It May 1 O-SJ Jme 3-98 July ].«! Aagnit 0-89 ^tember 2-26 I 0-54 1°^ |"~17iS- Inehea. laehai. Oil I'M 0-00 0-04 014 0-70 0-37 KM 2.3S MS 300 004 laoa Table No. 8.— Year 1904-05. Mo.VTH. Banft. JiuptNO Pond Caloahy Precipitation. Precipitatioo. Precipitatic October. . laehea. November 0.57 December O-W January... * 1*38 February. 0-58 Mareh... 0-30 Aiwil 0-90 May O-M June.. . »■<» July '.'.'.'.]]'.['. 3-»l ADKUat ^'^ sepvaber... ■..;;;!;: «■» 1-72 '^*" s:sr~ lochee. Inches. I'U 0.10 031 lot 0-90 OM 0-80 lot t'Ol 0.«1 O.M 0-35 14(7 Table ..v.. 9.— Year 1903-04. Month. Banff. JtmFixo Pond.,' Caloabv Oetober November December January Februuy March. .... -Mwil May June July ■\acust September Total Precipitation. Precipitation. Precipitatic Inehea. 0.72 2-00 064 1. 31 1-73 1-38 O'lM 078 2« 087 1-49 0-74 Inchee. Inohea. 0.00 W O'lS 018 0-18 0-88 014 188 IN 1-74 2.75 0.89 18-32 10-88 ii', 6 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« A. 1915 if APPENDIX IX. TEMPERATURE DATA. 2S«— 21 301 f L I I S OeOBGE V. BOW RIVBR POWKB AND BTORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER N«. 2S« 303 A. ISIS TEMPERATURE TABLES. 1912 CALGARY. Iahvamt. 1 j rmtanmr. UAMcn. MoMh Tnonunm. Mm - Duly Morth. TkamAtuu. Maa - DaUy Tunp Day Moath. TiiawuTuaa. -Miaa Mu. Mia. 9-m T«Dp Mu. Mia. Duly Mai. Mia. Daily Raan -9^ Tmb». 1 IC 11.. I M I» 10 n 22 23 14 2S... U 17 ■ m » II. . • 14 — 2 17 10 2 — 8 32 12 —15 — 1« -10 17 3 17 ■c 23 41 46 44 38 38 42 31 17 30 48 44 » • — • —11 — • — • -23 —10 ) —20 — 2» —30 —ID —10 — 8 13 15 10 -» 10 12 31 28 18 21 27 II 11 ( U n • 14 4 18 18 8 U 11 1 1 • » IT I ft 17 10 17 II » 18 18 10 17 11 10 11 11 M 17 M 7 — 4 t 1 — 2 -188 1 8-8 -17» -10 8-8 -8-8 II 18 si S' 18 m Ml 18 Ml lis 31 1 ! 1:;;:;: 4 8 8 7 8 • 10 11 12 13 14 U II 17 18 I» 30 11 22 23 M 28 n 27 a a • 47 49 10 a 30 a 17 a tt M 41 a 44 a 44 tt a 41 a M a M s 17 iJ i.ia • 18 a II ■ 2 10 a 11 10 II M a a 17 II M a a II a 8 s 11 17 8 U a — 1 -T 4M • II 17 1 21 M 1 2 IS a a a a n u 10 II If a 14 II a a 17 17 M 17 7 IT a ai • 31 -8 403 171 as a a II 171 a a ai ai »i ai a SI 81 III a ai ai a 81 V 1 2 3 4 S « 7 8 » 10 12 : 11 14 IS If 17 II If a 11 a a 2.::::: a n a a a II • 11 11 a If 31 23 a a 44 40 312 20 a 42 a a a 18 7 a M M W a M U « a a M a • — 3 —10 12 It 11 —If ~11 a 21 a a a a 27 M 11 a • 14 21 a 21 37 18 27 a a a a a a a If 31 f a a a 17 M a If a M a 4 a a 4 OS 1 S'S }f» 11 17 a 8 If lis as lis — »s 11 p a 41 a a a* at m lU _m a 1.071 87 78 ■ 21H rwj »n a-a WIT ».« Ma I'M ao" it 36»-21} 304 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTEBIOR 1912 6 GEORQE v., A. 191 S CALGARY— CofUinued. AniL. Mat. ICICB. TwruATcn. TwmuTi ■a. TmrauTuaa. Moath. HMD Duly Trap. Moath. Maaa Moatli. Mtaa Ttmp. T«mp. Ifu. lih Duly Unit. Mn Mia. Daily Raaat. Mai. Mia. Daily Raat*. • • • • • • • • • • • • • I H » 30 tt 1 17 » 4 15 1 70 38 32 54 1 M 33 33 «i 2 tf n 1 175 1 58 31 25 45-5 1 «4 M 38 a 1 iO n 19 401 1 59 10 19 44-t «....;.. 42 n M M'5 4 S4 u 28 41 4 54 M 18 45 1 41 N M US t 80 n 28 48 1 80 n r 46-5 t U 14 M IS't 8 84 40 24 51 8 18 39 r 47-5 7 M 10 M 47 7 74 41 31 57-5 7 77 15 41 58 a « r M 45 8 74 44 10 59 8 n 40 47 83-S • es It M 47 « 54 M 18 45 8 70 (0 10 10 10 (0 M M 47 10 80 15 25 47-5 10 75 40 39 97-5 11 M n 3 M-5 11 85 12 U 48-5 11 85 41 43 839 11 38 n 6 35 12 87 30 17 4(-5 12 88 48 40 88 u 40 » 10 15 11 78 38 42 57 13 70 54 18 82 14 M » 2« 41 14 81 44 37 83 14 84 42 22 83 u 58 M 32 42 15 82 44 38 83 IS 84 48 18 95 1( 60 M II 42 18 88 4« 19 58-5 18 89 SO 19 985 1} M » 28 41 17 87 42 25 645 17 73 48 25 60-5 IS U M 2» 40-5 18 84 40 24 62 18 80 44 38 82 I( S4 S7 27 405 1« 48 48 8 43 19 82 51 31 88-5 10 M M 32 40 10 52 42 10 47 20 84 SO 34 87 Jl M 31 28 45 21 M 13 21 431 21 85 49 38 97 n M J7 27 405 22 SO 40 10 45 22 88 80 28 73 a U 34 21 44-5 23 K 11 23 92 23 84 59 25 71-5 M «0 M 34 43 1 24 72' 40 31 98 24 88 67 31 72-5 tt 47 30 17 385 25 72 m 33 65'5 35 88 59 30 74 N i3 28 25 40-5 28 8e SI 15 98-5 28 90 S2 38 71 IT 47 30 17 38-5 27 80 49 11 54-9 27 81 59 22 70 n ei 34 27 47-9 28 88 13 13 49-5 28 71 48 22 80 n ao 2* 31 445 28 88 35 31 SO'5 29 SS 48 7 51-9 » 40 >,flU6 " 3 38-9 30 31 68 88 35 30 23 38 48-5 49 30 91 47 4 48 8N 7J7 1.934 1,178 758 2.213 1,376 337 U S3 28'M 24 96 82 38 3800 24'3« 75-78 45-88 2730 l! i ■t I BOW mVER POWER AND STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se ^^^2 CALGARY— Continued. JCIT. APOL'ST. SiniMUB, D«y o( — Uontb TCHntRATlRt. Hu. 10 II 11 IJ 14 15 1« 17 18 !• I JO 21 t » i 23 24 1 2» 1 2« I 27 1 2«.. 30 . 31.. M 50 72 72 63 63 S3 Sg 68 65 66 74 51 71 76 61 66 72 69 96 79 75 65 54 71 73 73 78 77 n 78 Min. D«ily Kance. Mean ' Day Daily o( Temp. Month TCUPIRATUU. .Uai. I 2,078 43 47 36 43 SO 48 48 46 46 42 SO 43 45 33 45 49 46 40 47 48 48 49 51 50 18 4« 44 42 48 47 SO 1,417 670 4t« 48-9 48-9 54 57-5 96-9 95-9 SO'S 52 57 53-9 58 Sg'S 48 52 60-5 93 96 96 98 52 27 i 61-9 26 14 4 23 27 29 36 29 32 28 664 21-4 62 98 92 59-5 59-5 589 60 62-9 63 64 I . 2.. 3.. 4.. 5.. 6.. 7.. 8 . 9.. 10.. II.. 12.. 13.. 14.. 15 . 16 17.. 18 . 19.. 20.. 21., 22 . 23.. 34.. 25.. 26.. 27.. 28.. 29.. 30 . 31.. Min. 49 55 48 56 44 42 50 47 48 S4 46 45 44 4." <:< 53 45 42 46 46 S4 56 53 SO 44 48 48 47 40 30 3S 2,(08 I 1,4S0 <6'0 46-7 Daily Range. 25 14 19 12 24 25 23 28 32 21 10 22 24 30 28 7 15 26 24 32 26 26 29 15 10 18 It 10 IS 31 25 658 21-2 ! Mean Day Daily of Temp. Month. TiwnuTrai. Mai. 61-5 62 57-5 62 56 56-5 61. i 61 •* 64.S 51 ■ 56 56 97 97 ' 965 52-5 55 58 62 67 I 69 655 97'S I 49 i 57 56 I 52 479 455 47'S 1 to 2 56 3 53 4 53 9 45 6 63 1 64 8 52 t 65 W 66 II 72 12 66 13 54 14 51 15 59 16 68 17 71 18 63 19 54 20 98 21 66 23 39 23 40 24 51 25 47 26 91 27 49 28 53 29 70 30 ! 69 Hin. Daily Ranfs. Mmu Daily Tamp, 35 36 35 32 42 33 45 49 40 40 40 46 42 34 25 30 37 36 36 33 32 35 32 29 37 32 37 27 29 37 25 20 18 21 3 30 19 7 25 26 33 20 12 17 34 38 34 27 18 25 M 4 8 26 10 19 12 26 45 33 378 46 44 421 435 48 S4S 481 at 53 56 U 48 Ut 41 49 St 49( 45 «5I 49 37 It » tf 41* 41 40 47- H 1.728 I l,06i I 667 J7-6 35 36 I 23-23 ft •I 1 1 306 DKPABTMElfi' OF TBM IVTMKWM 6 QEORQE v.. A. 1915 1912 CALGARY— ConltniMd. . "1 1 OciOBia Nonua t. "^ TunuTuu. DMly T«np. Moth. TnimiiiiM. Mmw T»mp. Moath. TuonuTou. Hau Math. Mu. UU. Duly Mm. Mb. DiOIy BMCt. Mu. Mia. Daily Rante Duly Teinii. I « S 4 • • J:;:;:: t 10 II I» 1» u li I« 17 M If » » a » M It M tt M n » H ■ <2 M 70 47 U n 9f 40 3t 9t St «t at «7 9t 40 41 40 40 43 93 48 48 94 99 4« 40 39 3t 92 • 41 14 44 3S 30 30 10 13 M M 11 27 U 39 40 34 31 2t 31 30 It IS U 10 24 31 21 10 22 • M 31 It « 14 40 2S 7 7 27 18 S it n 27 22 « 17 « 10 28 38 18 28 30 28 31 « 18 l« 30 ■ 91 to 97 41't 37 40 44S 3tS lis Its 40 42-t SI'S SOS SIS 49 399 349 39-9 39 2« 34 40 34 3t 41 39-9 399 80 2t-t 37 1 1 3 4 1 t 7 t 9 10 11 12 11 14 IS It 17 It It a.:::: g:::::; 14 » 2t 27 It It 10 • tl 47 44 4t SI 41 M 4t 44 It M 37 SI tt tl 44 tt 4t 47 4t « 44 SS 41 tl a tl » If a • a » 11 n It 11 M It M 14 It It a ii M II M a a a M 17 11 14 It It It 11 • a 17 14 M W a a 11 a s a It u 10 a a a 17 a It u It 11 u 11 It a a 17 11 • » as 17 a a as as MS 34 at a rt a 11 11 a 44 MS as as S7S a Mi MS as at as r as 17 1 1 t 4 S t 7 t t 10 II It 13 14 II It 17 18 19 a 11 a a M a a 27 a a a II • a 40 42 » 40 SI 42 W a r a 44 48 40 M a M 40 a tl 40 44 42 a 41 4t 48 M a a 41 • 10 18 19 19 21 32 32 31 13 9 a a a 1« 14 17 14 22 1« 13 M a » a a \l 21 18 • 20 30 24 7 a 30 10 18 8 ^ 24 a IS 8 IS 17 20 13 19 27 to 17 10 33 a 22 13 M 14 a ■ 10 a 30 18 9 27-9 a 37 41 39 20 a 32 U'9 32 9 a 21 8 a'9 27 a'9 a 9 a9 3» 23 S a us 33 37 r 9 27 a 309 1.988 883 g»3 i.ai tit ta i.ia Sa M7 M 18 288 a-3S 42-7 an an a-M It'll Itlt p 1 BOW BITER POWER AlfD BTORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« 1912 BANFF. Janoabt. FOBUABT. Mabch. J^ TiMRKAtCRI. Daily Temp. IJjy Moath. TunBATDBB. Ueaa Daily Ttmp. i 'ST : Moath. TlKHBATCBC. Mmb tioMh. Mu. MU>. DmIj Range. Hu. Uu. Daily Raoca. Max. Mia. DaUy Raaga Daily T«»p. Ie::: ? I «!::::::: u u u »::::::: M 17 a It M tl a a M a a XI S::::::: a • 7'7 4-8 10'4 4-8 8 - 1 U'3 15'2 - 2 -18'8 U'2 a2 U8 44'6 48 37 n'2 14- 1 12-2 as a a a 31 a4 37-2 Ul 31-8 42 a'4 a • -11 -252 - 8 - 8'2 3-2 -31 6 -18'4 -8'8 -as -as -37-6 7'2 58 I'4 M'S 19' 7 - 4'7 -16 - 2-8 11 18'5 162 113 13 ffl'l 11-8 15'2 125 M'3 »'7 ■ 18-7 »'7 16'4 13 8'2 3ll'6 M 7 240 216 10 498 160 300 432 tO'4 173 24-9 30 1 150 21 5 16 5 168 167 18 113 a4 169 19 3 , 15 7 7-7 - 2 -10 -2.7 -,J - 1 - 4 -13 -a -12 -15 M'8 a 40 27 8 - I 1 12 1 a ; 24 19 a as ; 24 a a a i M 1 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 » 10 U 12 U 14 15 IS 17 18 19 10 21 a a u . ... a a 27 a a • a'2 a'2 27 a'2 a'2 a a2 a- 6 381 as 371 ai a-s a'2 as a Ml a-s 31'2 as as a a as » Hi 17 179 • Ul 10'2 - M - 3-3 3'5 a 172 *( a'2 a M'8 18' 1 21'9 a 3I'2 28'2 25- 1 19-8 12'6 - 2 3 18'4 a 1-3 0-8 1'7 153 4'9 -13'4 -a'4 • ai ao ai as 3t'7 7 110 25' 7 12'9 9'8 123 160 14'6 9'2 48 98 110 IS'5 186 a- 9 13'> 12 31'7 a a'9 U'8 19-4 W'4 as • as M U u 19 as a 225 a M 31 a a as a a as 27 a 14 a a 17 M'8 17 a M 2 - I i ; 1 ! I-e; 1 8 S i 7 1 8 : 9 1 10 11 12 iJ:;:;:: M 18 17 18 i9 a 21 a a a a a 27 a a a SI 14-3 25 21 2 -»2 a'7 -13'4 as -13'7 a'2 -12 a'2 i- 4'7 a 2 -176 as !-i4'4 a'2 - 3-8 37'2 - 3'8 37 2 - 21 a 2 : 3-9 a'2 1- 7'9 a 3 - 08 a 9 : 13'8 a 3 2'3 as 24 a'4 13'7 23'2 -14'4 a 1- «'8 40'2 ! 9'9 44 18 3 46 1 : 12 49'7 j 18'4 M'9 1 a'9 468 a M'9 271 47-3 a'4 as 25-8 44'3 119 W'6 a'7 11-8 42'4 ai a'2 482 M'9 43'8 84'2 43-0 410 a'3 as 4t'2 Ml ai ao 93 14 7 378 43'8 W'3 a'7 34-1 31 3 17-0 a-8 a-8 10-9 140 a-4 a'9 • 8'S 1 S t 11 13 t 13 18 167 17-5 21 125 It a It as 21 4-4 13 a 31 a M a a a 42 a a 40 11 9'2 i a-s j a ! 7a9'7 - 21'8 M7'9 2S2'S Ul'2 ,' -2a9 ! a'7| i 1 ni'2 4050 -405 5«'7 lia 2 ! 302 8 9S0'8 1 !»M-» 1 i! 1 1 l«'8 I a'79 1'18' 21 '0 ! 1 U'lll 1:1.57 tB.Ml i| 1 1 ill aoB DEPARTUEyT OF TBB INTERIOR 1912 BANFF— Conttnued. 6 GEORGE v., A. 1915 APMk Mat. JONI. UMth. I t.. 3 . 4.. I . « . 7.. 8.. « . 10.. II . IJ . 13.. M IS 16 17 . 18.. !«.. 10.. n.. ».. a . N.. ».. M.. r.. ».. » 80.. TsimaATCu. Mai. 48-7 SS'8 62-2 42-3 380 45 I 46-3 65-5 Ml 89 I 51 '3 40-8 44-4 53'« 48-7 482 48' I 4»'2 4«'2 48-0 53-3 51-0 4«'3 80S 828 4«'2 81-2 4«'8 81 '« 47-2 1480-8 »il. Mia. 38. 4 40-0 3«'2 2«'4 252 170 30* 28-7 28-3 27'« 33-2 30-8 30'» 272 27-2 2«-S 25-2 2».0 270 238 34-8 220 320 330 280 28-8 28-8 2«'8 2«-0 33'S Duly Rule 28-9! 13. 3 15-8 180 12'» 12-8 28' 1 15-4 Mi 27-8 31. 3 l«'l 100 138 25-7 : 2I'5 I 15-7 1 20'« ; 20-2 : 22-2 I 24-5 285 28.0 172 188 248 30.7 22-7 19-8 22.« 13-7 Mean Daily I Temp. ' 8I0.« 2038 42 48 44 38 32 31 38. 8 42 42 43 42 38 37 40 38 37 385 3« 38 38 38 38. 8 40.8 41-3 40 38 40 St 404 40 Day o< Month. TiiinR.4Ta) 9-2 16 22-2 26-2 28-9 30-8 34-9 21-7 26 29-8 36-8 42-0 45-6 45 42-7 20-5 24-4 20-7 12-8 8-9 23-8 14-3 31-8 227 388 23. 2 13.4 176 139 253 272 24-4 20-7 12-8 8-9 23-8 14-3 31-8 Mcaa Daily Temp. 791-9 28-54. 40 39 41 47 49-7 86 47 41 42-5 47 517 54.4 53 58 49 46 426 43 45 47 47 53 50 84 54 468 48 43-6 43 Day o( Month. TiiimuTCM. Mai. 587 54. 1 54.7 559 584 682 78 78. 2 73-9 73-4 77-5 78-3 67-3 63-8 48-7 86-3 74 80-3 81-4 83-4 84-8 84-1 84-7 85-7 84-2 83-1 73-4 624 60-3 81 :3l27-8 70-92 Min. Daily Raace. 32 39-7 32-8 33-3 33-2 27-4 I 30-2 I 36-8 43.9 31-8 39-8 45-7 48-3 39-4 37-3 44-3 39-8 40-2 42-2 44-7 44-2 47-6 50-8 52-3 49 46-4 47-5 44-3 34-8 44-3 1233-8 40-79 26-7 144 21-9 22-6 25-2 40-8 47-8 414 30-0 41-8 37-7 32-6 19-0 24-1 11-4 22-0 34-2 40-1 392 38-7 40-3 38-8 33-9 33-4 35-2 36-7 25-9 18-2 25-2 6-8 M««i Daily Temp. 903-8 j. 30-13'. 48 47 43 446 46 47. 8 54 57 59 52 58 63 88 51 43 55 57 60 63 64 64 66 67 69 66 64. 7 80 83 47 47-8 n BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2Se 1912 BAiiFF— Continued. Month. 1 2.. 3.. «.. I.. «.. 7.. 8.. 9.. 10.. It.. 13.. 13.. 14.. U . It.. 17.. 18 . 19 SO.. 21. 22... 23.. 24.. 25... 21... 27... 28... 29... 30... 31... Jilt. TiiireR»rfRi. Mai. Mill. \ Daily Ranee S6S 43-2 15-3 53 J 41 5 11-8 «l-4 379 23-5 69-2 42 27-2 tu 456 19 4 87 42-3 14-7 441 45-2 8-9 M'3 40-3 180 83-7 43-8 19-9 m-i 42-2 211 et'6 45 7 139 M-3 4«3 240 99 40-3 I8'8 M'9 33-8 26' 1 69-7 41 2 25 5 «i'N 43 II 21-9 (U'S 43-2 20-3 74 4 35-3 ; 39 1 73-3 40-8 32-5 «1'3 47 9 ! 13 4 71-6 41-3 30-3 «5 44 21 »M 44-6 165 i2 I 45 4 6-7 M'3 38-2 , 28- 1 «8'I 3«'9 1 29-2 M-4 37 27-4 72-4 38-6 33-8 775 38-2 39-3 829 39-3 43-6 76 44-3 31-7 52 I 66-3 661 64-4 72-4 77-5 82-9 76 2012 64-9 1287- 1 Acouar. I Mean 1 1 Day Daily i of Temp.i Mootb. Mai. TiMraatTiRi. 508 47-4 496 35-6 55-3 49-6 49-6 49-3 53-7 52-8 53-6 52-3 49-6 \ 46-8 57 54-8 534 54-8 57 546 964 555 52. 8 48-7 52-3 31 '5 50-7 55 57-7 61 60 41-5 23-38 . 2.. 3.. 4.. 5 . 6.. 7.. 8.. 9.. 10.. 11.. 12.. 13.. 14 . 15.. 16.. 17.. 18.. 19.. 20. 21.. 22.. 23.. 24.. 25... 26... 27... 28 . 29 .. 30... 31 . 75 M'2 69-9 67-7 58-8 585 67-5 76- 1 74-4 «9'2 57-4 ei'4 65-5 731 71-4 60-3 48 632 68-6 73-4 76-3 79' 1 73-8 67' 1 S3'3 59' 1 i 62 ; 52 I 48-9 49'9 SO'l Mia. 46-9 45 46'3 52 40'5 34 44 39-9 45'6 49-4 44'8 41 7 32 342 37'9 42-3 35' 1 36-7 36' 3 39'5 40'5 46'2 S2'2 47'9 40-8 42 43'3 39'3 33 35'S 382 Daily Raage 19992 112832 «4'S 4139 28' 1 23'2 23 "t 15'7 18'3 24'5 23'5 36-2 28' 8 19'8 126 19'7 33'5 38' 9 33'5 . 180 12-9 26'5 32'3 33'9 35'8 ; 32'9 21'6 19'2 12-5 17' 1 18'7 I 12'7 ' 159 14 4 I 11'9| SirruntB. Mean Day . Daily of Temp Month. 7160 TuiniUTUBi. 61 56'6 68-3 59-8 49'6 46 55-7 58 60 59'3 51 Sl'5 48' 7 53-6 54'6 51 '3 41'5 50 52'4 5«4 S8'3 636 63 57' 5 47 S0'« 52'6 45 6 41 42' 7 44 9.. 10.. 11.. 12.. 2309. Mai. ! Min. Daily Range. M«aa Daily Tamp. 48'9 45 46 S3'3 50'5 55'9 59-9 54'8 58'8 68-5 73' 1 65'9 59' 2 55'6 63'3 67' 8 64 2 57'9 49'9 58'3 654 60 36-8 43'4 40'2 46'9 47 5«'3 64'8 58'8 35'2 32 34'8 28 37'5 33'8 41 41-9 32'3 30 33-3 37' 8 354 24'8 24-8 30' 1 32-9 40'7 30'8 26'9 28'3 32-2 I 28' 8 I 25'8 I 32-9 30 309 23'4 27 8 33'8 13'7 13 I1'2 25-3 13 221 18'9 12'9 26'5 38'5 398 28-1 238 30-8 38-5 37-7 313 17-2 19 1 31-4 37' 1 27'8 80 17'6 7'3 16-9 16' 1 32'9 37-0 250 • • 16764 957'9 718'5 55'8 31'9 33'9 42 |38'S 40-4 40' « 44« 44-8 504 48'3 4S-S 49 51-2 51-8 47 40-2 44 48-t 48-5 49-3 40-« 42-« 46-8 4« 32-8 34'« 87'» 38-4 3« 19'8 4«'3 4e'3 13 ri 910 DEPARTUVST OF THE IVTERIOB 6 QEORQE v., A. 1915 1912 BANFF— Con/inued. OcTCUB. NoTuau. DKBHsaa. TmruuTou. Day Mm ; Moatb. TnmBATCu. Maaa Daily Tamp. Uoath. TranaAToaa. Maaa DaUr Tamp. MMth. Min. Daily lUate Mai. Mia. Daily IUav>. Max. Mia. DaUy Raaia. • I ' 55 1 55 1 53 4 45 8 3« • 49 T 51 8 44 ( 42 10 4« 11 48 13 53 W 55 14 58 18 ' 57 }?::;::::: J? IS:;::;::! S » 35 11 1 33 11 1 37 » 35 M 37 It 1 43 M 40 » ' 39 » 35 » 31 W 35 JI 3« • 3« 43 44 31 3« 20 30 33 38 34 38 38 33 27 31 40 34 30 28 30 18 27 38 28 25 30 19 33 8 8 7 • 18 13 9 14 10 29 21 12 18 13 30 28 33 31 38 13 7 9 9 15 17 10 10 11 17 !0 19 13 33 30 31 • 47 485 48-5 38 34 34-5 34 40 38 39 34 38-5 44 48-S 87-5 34-5 30-5 27-8 24-5 32 30 31-5 33-5 35 28-5 29 19-5 20 22-5 • 1 VE \ 5 8 i 7 8 « 10 11 13 13 1 14 ^ 18 ■ 18 ; 17 18 W 80 31 33 33 24 U:::;:: 1 27 1 28 , 29 30 • 33 38 38 38 39 37 38 31 34 34 37 44 48 32 37 28 43 45 38 34 38 40 45 32 ^ 33 38 34 37 • 31 17 » 19 34 34 34 38 38 19 38 38 30 35 5 15 35 38 33 37 39 39 33 33 5 - 4 14 13 14 13 • 13 31 11 17 15 13 13 8 8 15 11 18 18 7 33 13 18 9 8 7 9 11 12 9 20 38 19 IS 10 14 • 37 37-8 33-5 r-5 31-5 30-5 30 38 30 38-8 818 38 31 28-8 18 21-8 38 40-8 388 305 33-5 34-5 39 27-5 15 9 33-5 30-5 19 30 1 3 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 13 13 14 18 18 17 18 19 30 31 33 33 34 38 38 27 28 29 30 31 • 38 SS 33 38 38 33 38 30 13 33 37 34 31 19 83 35 31 35 28 33 28 1? 30 23 24 28 30 • 3 20 13 8 30 33 18 17 - 4 17 18 38 - 1 5 II 30 10 13 19 20 15 23 35 17 10 17 24 • 28 10 4 10 30 18 1 10 13 18 33 10 18 8 30 31 17 13 5 9 35 9 13 11 35 15 5 8 4 11 8 • 15 35 18 18 18 It 27-5 11 138 4 11 33 38 38 9 15-8 It-8 38 33-5 18-8 13-8 »-8 18-8 10-8 U-8 3t-8 37-5 30 32 33-5 27 1 1353 833 520 j' 1048 1 845 401 881 i 447 401 43-84 28-87 '•■" 1 34-88 31-5 U-38 17-48 14-43 1303 \y- 11 BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAOB SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« ^®" CALOARY. 311 Si ti .1 i V »2 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR S QEOf!- - v., A. 1915 1911 CALGARY— Conlinued. 1.. 3... 3.., 4. . {... «... 7... 8... 9... to.. II... IJ... 13... 14... M... U... 17... 18... It. . »... 11... U... a... M... 15... 28... J7... 18... It... 1.48D Mmu.. 4887 24 17 8 -13 - 1 10 7 18 28 2t 2« It 23 30 27 32 2» 38 38 2t 30 40 32 31 42 34 28 2S 23 I 23 4 2« 33 30 33 3S 25 23 19 I 20 35 28 22 8 IS 29 23 38 8 4(1 » ; 42 10 34 11 27 12 33 13 4(1 14 44 15 , 2S 48 18 1» 39 17 30 41 18 20 48 19 37 48 ,20 44 42 \m 14 47 ij2» 29 47 '23 43 82 24 23 84 2S 24 48 28 14 38 127 24 37 '28 34 38 40 43 30.. .131.. 87 28 31 88 20 39 88 37 29 72 37 35 83 40 43 82 48 4 83 28 38 83 37 28 5t 30 29 SO 38 12 ' 81 30 31 , S3 40 13 , 42 40 2 1 S8 38 22 ! 63 3t 24 S3 48 71 S8 43 13 1 «3 31 32 M 40 18 m 38 30 M 42 14 38 34 4 42 32 10 41 32 9 4S 31 14 : 4t 33 18 1 81 34 17 ' 88 29 34 72 34 38 78 4J 33 78 4S 33 48 1 2 82 3 83 4 83 > 5 80 1 8 45 7 SO 8 45 9 44 10 45 11 47 : 13 41 IS 47 14 SI IS 50 18 90 17 47 18 48 19 51 30 4t 21 38 32 37 31 38 34 18 38 41 38 42 37 48 38 83 2t 82 JO 717 743 1,814 I l.llt It'tO 2477 ; 38-29 LMmii....>S 56-51 3808 818 22-42 47-3 iMau.... 71 8. 89 7ti 74 74 72 ' 81 82 , 82 8t I 88 ! 87 ' m 70 56 88 I 8t 88 88 I 88 82 ;5 4. 44 2.081 1,37? 1. 7 I ti . 38 34 23 18 20 28 33 5 18 22 22 18 20 U 4 48-7 23-81 701 80 80 S3 81 83 IK •8 t>'i 84 85 68 St 87 88 6t 81 67 58 57 St H 88 67-8 14 1 how SIVER POWER ASD STORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« 1®" CALGARY-Continued. 313 • I « 3 ?9 S (7 4 ts « 72 «. 82 7 N 8 M • 84 10 65 I! 63 IJ N 13 79 14 81 15 78 16. 82 17 60 18 to 1« 60 ao 70 21 54 a 62 23 71 24 78 25 88 25 65 27 70 28 1 78 2« 62 30 1 64 SI 68 :s t i 2,132 Mean 314 DEPAXTMEVT OF TBS INTBSIOR 6 QEORGE v., A. 1915 1911 CALGARY— Conitnt ei. Ji' Oonmm. I NOTUBBB. DSCUIUB. ^ TnonuTUBi. Man IMIy T«n». HMh. Mbbb Duly Ttmp Uoatb TmnBATina. Mmb Mnth. Mki. Mfa. Btrnm Mu Mia. iauly iRaiif* M*i. MlB. OiUly Daily T»nip. I S 1 4 » • U • • IT • M 1 • a • 4 • 28 • 18 • SO • a • • M 4 a 2 N IR 32 34 44 27 17 35 M It a 1 48 a 22 37 48 a 33 37 » a 41 4 43 a 11 37 44 a 19 33 M n a 41 S 40 11 l« 31 41 a 15 7 » 9 M K a 4T 9 M M « so 41 14 tJ St T« 11 40 M a (T T 1 14 « « 3 II 1 i 44 44 a 14 18 10 35 M 74 17 IT M 9. — -10 4 - 8 ». M 11.;:;;;; ■ a a a 10 — s -21 13 -U 10. U 20 15 38 M a 19 n 11 -a 21 -10 III. 40 12 tl u a 4T 11 -17 a - 8 113. 40 it a u a a 11 -10 -19 9 -IS 13. 41 17 M M tf IT a 14 - 1 -17 It -12 'U. 42 a IS tP M a 4T 11 17 -11 U 12 I.V 38 18 a IT.;;;;;; u •) a a M 1* a a 12 18. 38 a II 4t n 19 IT 17 40 IS a a i;. a 14 14 40 a 14 a II 41 14 M 31 18. a ft n 38* 41 IT a a 19 a a 14 a 18 34 29 1 II a a It a a a a 12 a 20 a 2t $ 39* a.;;;;;; a n M a 4T 11 a 14 a 19 21 37 $ ]f 23 u a 11 44 a a S a 19 22. M M M n a M 1 a a M 17 a 31 a. n n M a a 10 » M. 11 IS a M M. 12 a a 14 M a a 17 a 9 a M. ! 24 ' - 1 ft 11 a. n U a a a a IS 1 a M. 14 8 9 IT a '4 a a » M 9 12 11 27, , -10 10 a a 17 a M « 44 1 a a a. . ' -10 -20 10 fi-E 44 a M a •. 44 11 11 a » -21 1 -a $ -.34 -34 - 7 IT a a a IT t a a -;;;;; a M II a 1?-. :! -19 > -» 12 1 -a 11 i.m m «a Ml 171 as 1 9a ; 170 sw iin »w au an 9 10 "•"1 1 : M 97 11-94 ISM I** BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAGE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« 1811 BANFF, SIS' FllBDJIIIT. Hoath. TUDOUTUU. Mu. 1 -7-8 » 172 3 22-7 « It i 3M 6 252 7 a* S 241 1 2I'7 10 n'8 II ut 12 30-3 IS r-7 I4t 2*3 It 244 I( II 7 17 15 li MI I( MI JO 144 21 12 22 III 21 MI H 11 25 j U 2*. ..' It 1 1 27 17 1 » M't 1 Mia. Daily Raao. lit -MS III 10-9 lit I3« ID'S SI 1*1 178 II« 18 4 «« 4-8 7 -81 4-7 -71 -III 14 1 -148 -81 -4 104 -15 -II -It -44 11-7 47 10- 1 13' I 18' I I1'8 III. 18'2 I7'5 15 a II « 108 as 174 M'O lO'I 11'8 Ml 101 Ml M'5 401 III 151 Ml 111 lO'l Umm Twnp. 7107 i Ml Motj la' I3'7 -I'l 171 171 as II' 4 17.2 lS-0 ao as Ml M4 171 III I5'7 •■7 141 8'l 4-5 111 8'T II 'P II I M'7 I0'4 71 *'4 111 an 1415 MAica. 1... 2... 3... 4... 5 I. 7..., 8.... I .. 10 . II 12 . 11 . 14 .. 15 . II . 17. .. II .. II .. ».... 21 ... a... a ... M a a ... 17 a.... a... » . SI . 41 3 4I'S MI S4'9 M'4 40'8 40-2 M'7 I M4 ai a N'8 411 40 451 452 418 471 SO 41-4 «I3 a I n 41 t Ml M7 MI 44 1 m 441 II 1 |II74'I 41' II 5 1 143 Ml II I as »'7 I7'8 a'7 I7'7 II 2 as U8 18* 178 ni 145 Ml MS Ml »f) as a4 »•» l.; . M «'8 Ml M'3 21'7 7MS a57 M] M'7 114 M'U M4 203 • 5 »■» 8-7 4» IU'8 115 l'8 21 1 r 8 ai Ml 17 7 11 5 lis 175 Ml Ml III II I 111 14 I 114 11 4 111 14 Ml 1 I7'U a 41 at 27'7. H'l. t8'»' 111 W'7 U'l 31 1 Ml HI ai III ut »y tlT Ml a-r M-8 44 1. 411 171 MI M'7 Ml ao M'l> 111 180 42'r Ml M4 i; I sie DEPABTUENT OF THE ISTERIOR S GEORGE v., A. 191S 1911 BANFF— C7 H-8 a 87-7 U-4 U-8 U-l M U 40 M-8 471 « MS 84-1 N8 74-4 • a4 at 40-t 41-4 81-8 M-8 a-8 a Ml Ml M-8 at ai a-i ai at 418 17-t M-7 a Ml a-i a-i at a-i as ai Ml r-8 at MS • a- 6 a- 7 lt-8 17-7 »<1 11-4 lit a a-i a-i »-i 14-7 s-t at r-4 ist 108 11-8 14-7 a-8 11 8 18 7 t-8 10-1 18-7 M-t 11 8 U2 M4 a-7 Mt • 41-7 40-1 U-8 81-8 U-t U-8 44-8 40-0 40-4 41-4 41-0 41-8 Ml ttt 41-0 47-t M-8 47-1 Ml 41t U-7 Ml U-l M-t r-s M8 17-t 41-1 «-0 SI 8 MS 1 1 t 4 8 1 7 1 t 10 11 u u 14 18 It 17 18 It M 11 a a M a a 17 a a M • 71 'i\ 87 U 2' u-4 W-1 U-l 74 n-t 71-4 n-t 71-4 70-3 74-1 74-S 71-8 87 U 1 74 U4 U-3 80-t H-3 81- 1 *H W-7 U t • U-8 88-1 89 a-i 11-4 U-l »i r-8 44-t 41-1 N M-4 r-t 40-8 tt 17 48-1 1»i N8 801 181 4-1 41 1 1 M-7 Ml 4t-> 418 U8 • 87-1 U-l 11-1 r-7 rt Ml US a-8 U.4 U M-4 a-4 Ml US a-7 a-i r-s r-i r-8 a-4 a-8 r-t 18-1 lt<4 at It-O it-i r t 8 • U-4 U-l U-8 U-t U-l 47-1 U-l 4t-l Ut U-l H-S N-4 U.7 t«-8 U.7 U-l U-l u-8 U-t U-l ns u-l 81 -t U8 U-t U-O u-t u-l U8 M-8 IM7-7 IM-S IM-1 1 lt7l-4 lOOI-S tM-t tttM-2 lat 4 1 781-8 ! *** 11-11 »-S7 MM a-1 118 41 II 1 M-17. 40-1 { M-Ot U-M BOW RJVER POWER AND STORAOS SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26* "" BANFF-Con«n««d. ai7 JCIT. Miath. 1., S., 1.. 4.. 5.. «.. 7.. (.. (.. 10.. 11.. U.. u.. u.. u . M.. IT.. U.. If 10.. n.. a.. ».. M... U. M... n... n... TnmaATuu. Mu. Mi- Daily HI N3 Ml «'4 71-4 HI N-7 Ml U'4 tot 701 711 M Ml HI rrt Ml M4 74-4 711 Ml 711 IIS Ml 711 Ml I 711 ! 70 I MS Ml Ml tt'8 41-7 »'• MS U3 41'3 n 4S't 418 III 101 Ml 178 41« 441 It I 4M 40-7 Ml 48-4 441 17-4 41-4 411 471 403 438 480 3«'3 37 Mm DaUy Tmp. Ill 11 lit 144 38'( Ui US »7 I4» B't 111 N'l 4S'l 481 41 7 313 MS 111 17-7 Ml 171 a'7 Ml 4M 431 307 17-8 Ml IM Ml 311 M-4 M« Sl'O 47' 1 SO-0 SSI IM 414 Sl'4 Ml 48 t SOS Ml Kt «3'i «3'l Ml Sl-4 411 Ml 810 57- 1 Hi no Ml 821 Ml HI HI Sl'4 HI Avavwt. Mooth. Tuonunraa. » 10 II 13 13 14 IS 18 17 18 II 10 11 n » M I » I M 17 18 » I 10 31 ! 1171-7 ilMS I I I Ml N't Ml II Ml SI M M8 87-4 MS 87 708 80 87S 73-7 I 76-2 73'8 S8'4 S7'l i S7 2 «8'2 < 70.1 83-3 Ml 88-3 67 ' M'3 87 70-4 p«ly Rial*. Ml 43'l Ml 411 4U'I 4S-1 I *» 37-7 I 31 f 343 I 34-1 j MS i M 4 17-4 ' IS'g 371 111 ; Ml »'3 31-7 433 3M at 41 8 31 1 3SI 40-8 4S'l 48-8 48-7 HI 11-2 10 HI 14' 1 7'g 7 148 Ml n'7 33 1 M'7 H'S M4 338 31'7 U'l 43-7 : 37-4 ; HI ! 35'3 14 I I 370 1 Ml 21-7 170 324 28'2 111 18'2 21'7 Man Duly Temp. |1I87 2 1311-3 70'W 41-M 28S7 . M-10 H-07 7II 2S02 Ml Sl-S ' Ml i Sl-1 i 471 ' 41- 1 Ut j 41-7 I SOI U-8 ! Ml Sl-1 SI -I U I 48-7 Sl-7 U-8 M-4 Ml 481 481 411 417 Sl'7 Sl-1 47-1 SI- 1 HI M-7 S7-I Ml SimiisBB. MoDtb 1.. 3.. 4.. S.. 8.. 7.. 8.. I.. 10.. II.. 11 . U . 14.. IS.. 18.. 17.. 11... 11. . M . It... n... M... M... U... M... 17... M... n... M... TunuuTDBi. Mu. Mia. 71-S 71-1 U-4 SI 47-1 4S-8 Ml W 81 1 70-7 72-1 71-4 M-7 « Ml 48-3 SM SI Ml 81 47-1 n 3S-I 43-1 MS n4 M 3 Ml Ml HI HH-0 lOM-0 U-1 U-7 HI 41-1 M7 U-( » HI n Ml 111 n-i 48 M Ml H-7 M U-1 Ml Ml Ml M-4 U-1 ll-f Ml U M-3 M-4 M-4 M4 Daily U<4 Mil U-1 Ml IS-I 7-7 71 10-3 171 It 4 Ml 401 40-4 n-8 »-7 14 IS 81 13- i IS 7 M 187 18-1 l-l 10- S Ml »-3 M-4 Ml 14-7 17-7 11-4 Maaa Daily Tan*. Ml U-1 S7-I 47-1 41-1 40-7 41-7 Ui 48-1 SO-1 no Hi M-4 HO M-l MO Ml tt-l HI H-7 HI N-7 M-4 Ml n-4 HI 41-3 Ml HI 17« 1 IN 11 1 I h I 'l»^ 35>-2a MS DEPAltTliEXT OF THE IXTERIOR HI 1911 BA^FF— Concluded. Mem II D«y D«lyii of Temp. , Moath. 6 GEORGE v.. A. 1»18 Damom. TEMmATcn. Mai. Mia. Daily Raaia. »- 3»'7 37 IS» 112 16 a* 12-4 U2 23-4 33 10-2 32-2 34-2 3«2 2« 3t» 26'6 30 18 263 6 30-3 22- 1 3t 12 7 28-: »'2 27 156 24 2 9'« 13 -8-8 2(1' 8 2'!t 228 10-6 26-7 10 18« -01 3I'9 1*8 33 11-8 13 -126 134 -127 11 2 -13-3 11 • -11 -8« -17-4 -15 -2S7 0-2 -28-8 7 3 -263 M«H Daily Ttnip. 10 34-7 211 36t U-2 13-6 21-5 a-3 6'8 26-3 238 11-6 (0 2S-2 S-2 321 6t 30-8 11 24-0 10-3 16-2 S-2 26-2 16-3 W6 61 23-7 111 21-1 146 16-6 21-3 2-4 17-6 11-6 11-6 16-6 16-7 18-4 16 6-4 16-7 28-7 21-2 22-4 26-6 1 261 0-4 34-5 -1-1 226 0-3 6'( -13-2 10-7 -20-3 26 -14-3 336 -•-» 7110 18S-K 525-2 BOW SJTER POWBB AND STORAaE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 26* ^^^0 CALGARY. 319 I t « s t. 7 ». ». 10. II 11 It. K. U. M IT. M ». ». n. » 23 M »- ».. IT Jtt » au 2 -!• 9 -• 14 -1 M 1 24 2 2T 1 10 M 10 l( n 11 M « IT T 11 t M T 3* f 21 11 33 -* 1 3* 7 ' 41 22 M 21 34 3 42 11 4V 32 3(1 24 4» 21 40 32 a: ID 4JI It 31 24 4(1 i M : U » 21 I* i II II II 22 . » 14 : 14 14 , 21 , » IT n 10 11 29 1 « 2tl 8 Itt 30 7 711 • -T ' 1 2 I 1 111 4 11 8 I4't 1 a 7 a 1 II t IS 10 17 II IIS 12 lis 11 M 14 17 IS US 11 21 S 17 31 S 18 21 19 IIS 10 rs 21 31 32 27 21 3S 24 3« 24 W ■M 25 I 30 27-5 22-4 37i :s 21 M 41 40 41 4T 10 II IT r N 14 II -1 s « II I -7 -II -7 4 I M 41 34 • IS 14 17 M 11 2 4 10 II 4 II -1 -IT -a -14 -< -10 -II -» -a -IS -14 -10 10 II 19 34 M 21 32 21 7 24 II I 30| 2 3 IS a II 'Ji 3! « i » ! IS 15 : 41 21 < » ' 964 ISl 112 M«u 31 09 11. a 19 74 I SM 10 524 Mau. Iia •»7 18H 134 1 48 17 2 SO 28 3 48 27 4 m a 5 3« MS 8 37 M-5 7 44 14 8 34, 20-4 » JO; MS 10 48 I 21 11 «2 19 12 ao 17 13 60 I -1 14 62 -9-5 15 «2 I -9 , 1« (Ml -5 17 02 I 3-4 18 .. «2 I 3 19 ... 59 ' 8 4 20 m ' 14 21 «7 19-4 22 03 ■10-4 23 47 -74 24 42 -«-4 24 tH 11 art .W 3(4 }7 41 -'II 2» 48 .>« 4lt 3(> I 44 31 44 l«2(i ir 32 2U 20 IS 10 18 18 12 40 37 M 2S 30 34 29 32 32 32 31 4(1 31 4(1 32 27 a 38 24 i:i .15 841 32 18 a lu 20 27 a IS a 18 25 j 24 33 a a ; 30 30 27 :« 32 10 21 I " I 15 24 i a 21 17 7S9 31 41 a a a ss II M II 49 49S 44 41 41 M 41-S 47 47 4SS 4« S u s 47 US 17 17'S MS 41 4 a 45'S as Mean 42 2« 27 44 , 24S1 25e— 22J DMPAWMMNT Of TBM IVTMUOU 5 QEORQE v., A. 1015 1910 CALGARY— Confo'niMrf. Am. Mat. firm. ^ Tnonunu. Ifau IMIy Tmp. Math. TuanuTuu. Man DaUy TMOp. Dyr M«Ui. TmniuTvu. Mmi Tap MMk. lUi. ma. D,Uy Mu. VDm. DiOly Mu. Mia. Daily Rmth. t a a « a ?::::::: a J::::::: It It u u u 1?::::::: la Se::; » 18 as as la 17 18 la ao • M M SO *9 11 40 H to M 80 tt 17 80 so M M 61 78 80 87 M « 71 n M H n 48 M 88 • 38 M 31 38 83 M 33 31 31 83 88 37 83 14 30 40 36 so M SO 28 31 40 40 43 47 38 40 M 81 • M 11 M 17 41 1 M 14 11 37 It 40 11 11 44 ^ 41 44 7 M n M 41 ' 41 11 40! \\ 1 ■ 41 U 88 4U..1 48-5 87 89 43 47 488 44 47 41 r 42 S3 448 M H n-8 438 488 l?.s! Ss! 48 *^ "-I 1 3 8 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 n 13 18 14 IS It 17 18 19 3U Jl 23 33 34 35 38 27 1 28 ! 29 80 31 • 83 13 « M 74 77 74 M 80 42 62 70 n M M 70 It 52 U 75 17 75 80 80 70 M 60 70 73 to • 11 33 10 81 M 88 48 40 88 34 38 88 89 40 U ^ 40 M 33 82 47 r 40 48 88 88 87 47 • IS 40 15 38 38 89 38 It 17 8 19 87 38 14 19 44 28 11 16 25 43 30 88 40 35 26 38 37 83 88 18 • 888 43 475 SO U 878 60 48 418 88 428 SIS 53-5 47 445 48 60 455 M 45-5 : 53-5 1 57 M to t8't 57 50 41-8 M MS M-8 t. '.'.'.'.'.'. 8 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 18 14 18 It 17 18 19 30 21 22 23 M 35 38 27 38 28 80 ■ 60 41 M 70 78 77 60 H 75 M 87 78 83 77 72 72 79 72 M 61 61 77 M 87 83 70 75 74 • 87 80 38 V, 47 M 41 40 M 41 44 M 43 44 SI 53 43 42 SO 47 M 46 42 43 44 46 «i • 28 11 23 33 39 30 16 30 35 40 41 iS u 39 36 30 30 37 22 17 27 IS 35 41 43 87 30 27 26 • 488 MS 448 MS MS 62 52 M 57.5 MS M 555 60 635 64 62 67 eO'S 61 55-5 47-5 53-5 59-5 63'S 655 MS 60 613 61 1818 { «U 878 1 1 19tt 113S 871 1 3160 1292 8t8 ; Itaa. 60'« 1 31'48| M-ltj Mmb. 64-a M-39 311t M«u. j 720 4307 28-93 BOW BITER POWEB AXD STOBAOB SESSrONAL PAPER N«. 28» 1910 CALGARY— Continued. 321 11 TtEPARTMENT OF TBB IlfTgRIOB 5 QEORQE v., A. 191S 1910 CAUiARY— Concluded. Pi ..liiS BOW RIVER POWER AND STORSOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 2S« ^^10 BANFF. ■HI DEPAJtTMENT OF THE ISTERIOB 5 QEORQE v., A. 1918 1910 BANFF— Conlinued. Ana.. IJJX MoMh. 1. a. I 4. t. ». 7. ». f. 10. 11. 11. 13. 14. IS. K. 17. 18. 1>. 10. 11. a. ». M. ». M. «. ». ». w. TiMniuTcu. Mu. 43 37 3«'3 42-3 4M 40'« 40 4«'3 53'* »7 U't 52-4 43-3 4M S3'3 M-4 U «M 68-4 638 48- S M MS 72« 7S'4 72-8 «3 I 84-3 44-8 I 42-8 1 Mia. 181 3«I I2't 27't 338 327 28-8 2«'8 2«'2 ]»'( 34-7 31-8 2«-4 18-4 24-7 381 38-8 3M 82-7 3«'3 31-2 37-7 3M 37-3 30-8 33-8 3«-4 33-8 31'« 301 Duly Raoie. 83-30 IW-4 3011 24-1 10-t 18-4 144 7-8 8-2 14-2 18-8 24-8 27-1 222 20-8 13« 22-7 28-8 21-3 30-2 1«-S 33-7 24-8 17-7 21-3 38-4 38-3 44-9 3«-8 28-8 10-7 12-8 12-8 H«HI Duly Temp. 11-W 31 3I-S 28-1 38-1 378 388 32'« 38 415 43-5 458 42-1 38-3 23-7 I 48-7 ' ** i 48-3 40 51-5 40 ' 48-3 ' 80-3 88-0 83-0 83 4«-7 440 ; 38-2 388 Mat. Hontb. TumuTDU. Meu.. Mu. Mia. ! Duly I iRaat*. 47-9 84-9 59-9 858 71-3 87-8 87 80-8 889 45-3 80-8 88-7 58 « 601 50-9 80-9 81-8 58-2 47-7 83-8 88-5 71-8 75-8 75-6 73-3 58 532 87-1 82-8 81-4 80-2 1.871-8 80-37 18-3 22-4 23-9 289 30- 1 34-t 40-1 39-3 27-3 33-3 29-3 389 347 34-3 30-4 27-9 45 37-2 32-4 32-2 28-3 379 31-8 387 444 41-2 371 28-8 42-2 30-9 41-9 19-8 315 380 38-8 41-1 33-7 38-9 21-5 39-8 12-1 31 5 218 23-7 159 20-5 330 18-8 190 15-3 31-8 38-2 33-8 440 38-9 28-9 18-3 16-0 28-3 30-3 305 18-3 Man Duly Tnnp. 1,087-0 834-8 33-48 28-92 31 38-8 42 482 I0-7 51 83 5 50 42 392 48 473 488 422 40-8 44 4 53-4 48-7 40 43 47-4 84-7 138 98-1 58-8 493 452 429 53-3 48-1 81 Day ol Mooth. 1 2 3. 4 5. 8 7. 8. 9. 10. II. 12. 13. 14. 15. 18. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21 22. 23 34. 28. 28. 27. 28. 29. 30. Juki. TuimuTOBB. Mu. Mia. Duly 59 42-8 84-8 18-8 70-1 87-1 56 624 St-8 77 76-5 56-3 68-3 70-4 742 70 80-2 89-7 68-2 60-3 83-9 81-3 58-3 888 74 784 78 71-1 66-0 64-7 364 39-3 30-7 33-9 33-3 41-7 339 39-8 38-3 418 48-8 43-3 43-3 33-5 42-3 37 45 40-2 36 44-5 38 32 32 35 40-5 40-2 38-8 41 9 41-0 40-5 1.147-1 ,1.136-7 810-4 Mmui...| 64-1 n-8 37-0 Tamp. 32-6 13-3 I 23-8 : 32-6 17( I 15-8 I Ml I 23-6 I Ml I 351 37-7 13-0 23-0 ; 38-1 ; 33-0 33-0 ' 15-2 19-5 32-3 158 151 29-3 283 336 33-5 35-2 383 29-3 26-0 Ml 47-7 35-1 43-1 80-1 81-1 84-t 45-0 510 48-3 58-4 67-6 48-8 54-8 610 581 53-5 53-6 49-1 51-1 51-4 460 46-6 44-1 51-8 57-3 57-8 68-9 6«-6 638 616 Hi BOW RIVER POWRR AKD 8T0RAQK SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25« *®10 BANFF-Con. At D»to. Prrrioaa. ••IMI Wy AlK 3 9: Bm Oft » O-MO DiSwcM* ia Feet. Plw. MinuA. 0>145 oaiM OMW 0'17W 00710 O'Oeis 0-417 0'4» 0-371 U3 0.»l fl-2755 0115 0'3M own n OM 0083 0042 U0 ' OSS ■010 ■os: •020 ■»4:i ■IW 187 ■■»« r« tMT. Otrm RuMxa*. Dimiuvct IN Tht At IHU. : PravioM. Omi. oati oom OMI) o.MM 0.M9I onti «n»77 I' -.M OOM noSK I.M. (.txlUt R»I«HC« II imtn Intuil Vm\ viady (More irfilliDg Aftrr rvAIti^. Vm windy ToUl •nynmtiM to Jum S. oho (Mi. 332 DBPARTMtVT OF TBE IWTtBlOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1015 Station No. 2.— Calgary. (Pan in ground. 1897. DAfi, 1807. GADoa lUumiM. DunuKci IK Fan. At DM*. Praviow. Oiii. Lm. Mur 1 ooaw 0-0t4« o-o«ra ootti 00711 ootn 00660 00710 OOUO 0066* 00(71 00(78 00(tl 00781 oooas 006(0 ^ 8 oooto B«(orara8llug. Att«ra6Uiac " 1 " U 00064 0-0070 OOOU 00033 " It " » J» S " » oooto VcrywuMly. 00050 0-OMS Total evapoimtiiia to Jiuw 5, 0-0268 tnt. Station No. 1.— Calgary. (Pan in ground.) 1898. Inten-al. 1898. En*Mo( Evaponitios over Preeipitatioa. EnMor over ETavontioo. Prwipiution Toul Evaiwtatioa. ioM 8-JuM 2« laehM. 0-792 26U4 2-llK) 2-688 6-576 0-372 laehM. Incboa. 321 3-87 2-17 0-M 0-28 0-(» loebM. 4-001 6-474 Jna* ]»-iuly3l. ,. ialy 31-Ab«. 30 Aii(.30^t.30 3 228 6896 0-373 8«pt. 3(M)«. 31 Oct.Sl-Nor.S Totalt It 1»3 10-07 IS 162 A«riJI3.Mayl . Mayl-May3l .. MaylMimSO ., Iwm JIKIaly 31 . . Jaly 3I.Aa(. 31 Aug. 31.Sq>t. Ml Bayt. SO-Oot. 11 . Oel 31-N'oT ?n TiH«!ii Station No. 1.— Calgary. (Pan in ground.) 1899 Inlrrval. I8M. EuMiot Evapotstiaa laehM. 1-140 1-380 I- 160 oin 7-146 Etewaot Preeipita t ioa Proeipitatioa. Evapoimtioa. Pneipitatioa. laehM. 1-666 ■" i-m o-in t-764 O'OS 344 3-81 2-11 »-40 O-W 131 016 23. 08 EvapoimtioB. laebae. MM 1-744 4m 4-466 ISM 3- ISO 1-118 0-4S1 30-864 Station No. 1. — Calgary. (Pan in ground.) 1900. latarval, 1600. EieaKof En( Evaporation Precipitation orar over Preetpitatina. Evaporation. Precipitation. Total Evaporatb Apr. I-Apr. SO ladMa 0-171 I7M 1 Od 1414 2400 10* 0-804 laobea Inchee 2 04 I .12 386 201 I 2« 3«* 40 000 Inehaa 2 411 Aar.W.Aiv31 Migr SMaae 30 JnalO.Jttly3l .... lOM 4.»»3 4-444 Jalyll-Ani 31 3-600 Ab|. 3l-8mt. 30 8i»t. «K>et. 31 OOM O-0M Oat. Il-Nov. 14 0-804 Totale *-Kt IOM 1 at lao S GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e A. 1915 INDFX. I 25k 23 .•J33 1 5 GEORGE V. SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e A. 1918 INDEX. Appodix Ass;jr,dis?^*'"°"«~°^ Additional nuciiic witions.'. AjratS^^ToftSs^^^ iCWfM;Eirtin,,ted; Bow Fort SiU ^ Ghost " „ Miwion " I t •• • Kadnor " ii" n^'i!""SJ? ""o'-en..:.:: „ ^.R^b^^a^^^con,., ;:::;:;;;::;:::::::::::::: VII. R„„^ff D^£"-'"*" """"'"ioM.. : . . iv'5"^'P''»''""D«a. ■■■■.■.. **• iKinperature •' A ,. ^. -^f r-vaporation " AppIicaUou, for Power RiuhKi. - . „ Conflict between ■ AreaolBowUkeBaein .. f't°^'*'onwe Basin,. .. S"* '•"'."efanka Baain , rJ'f'y i-»l" Baain. Area, Draiiuiie. of Baiter Creek I' Bow River „ „ Brewster Creek. ElhowRiver UhoatRiver.. Johnson Creek. . ., Kanaoaakis River „ , Pipestone Creek . . ... „ ."^prB.v KiviT Auxiliary Storage, Table No. 24 Baker Creek, DisehaiKc . " Draiaaie Area..!! ^^ General [^ Reconnaiasanoe of Baker uke...^'"'^'^'''""'""^;-'-'-----:::. :::::::■::::::;. ::::::;:;:: " ,» .Reconnaiwanoe of gww". Prof. H. T . on Ice formation BaalM, Storage. Table No. 2 Bewifita of Storage " General ...... „, . „. .. Table No. ».. Bj».e^rAk... on Precipitation^ .v.- Devebpment ....,.,',' .i ,-. " Annual chaiira ".'.;.'.■;;.;;; ;;;;; r, " dischanrinn capacity of IlevHopment, Eatiniated oost Head II Development. Intake .' „ II I'enatocka . " .. V,"*'" ■■^,'««i'n and Kquipment J;"*''"-' f Time Curve, Plate .Vo. 21 JtorageCharnee . . • "■ *• Total Capital f.wt . „ ,'■ w.tersuppiy.^""""'""'"'-'"^-'--;^:: ::::::;;:;;::,: Area of | - " " Bow Ijike Mtorace . II KITcct of. Plote No. i« , tatimated Cmlof , „ InvMtiiniiioBol „ Manipulation of ■• Noiirce of W «ter .Supply ^ Ba.iin. ProoeM of Hllii« „ 11 Capacityof V.'.' Samyal ^ Dam „ " Knihaaiunent . . , " Hpiilway.. ■■ 25e— 23J 335 raas. M 9 a 13 n iJ . a M M M Ul U7 1« m in IM IM 3*7 aos > i B7-104 105-113 72-M M-W 121 1 tia lot 130 127 Hi 124 M 1«3 12« 125 125 3 I2« m i« 3 134 134 S 24 •«7 M 50 48 4« 4» 48 40 4I» 4* 140 .iO SO m 47 3 9« W I4U ini N 108 its m Ml 3as DEPARTMEyT OF THE lyTESlOR S GEORGE v., A. 1915 Bow Riv«r, Gmw»1 " Baiiiii, Winter oonditioiia u " Diviaions erf " Drainace Area ' Power Co. Honieehoe FalN PUmt * " Kananaakis Falls plant " " Minnewanka Dam " Power situati'in In " Public 'Jtilitiee Canal. Ghnet site " Kananaakia development " Miaeion site Canadian Pacific Uy. Car Shops Canyon Creek ■ Capacity, Curve, Spray Lake boain - •* How l^kes baain " M innewanka baain ** Spray Basin *' Kegulatiag basin, Ghoat River " •' " Kananaakia Uiver " Storage basins Table No. 18 Cnpital Coet Estimated, How Fort Site '* " How Ijike Storage " '• Elbow River Development '• " Ghoat Bite " " Kananaakia Storaffe " " M innewanka Storage " '* Mission (Site Radnor Site " " Spray Lake Storage Cascade Power Devekipment " " " Agreement re •* " '* Available power Dam Head " " '* Penstock •< " " Power Station and Equipment. " " " Water Supply Cement plants . ., Charges. F,atimated, Annual Reg. Basin No. 3 Clay products Clearing Minnewanka Baaia Spray Basin Conclusions ICIbow River devekipmeBt Conditions for Anchor Ice Frasil !co Conflict betwwn Applications Conatniction Dam, Hydraulic Fill " M innewanka " ' ."^pray Ijike Conatruction Difficulties Bow Luke " Hnraeshoe FalU plant Kananaakia Falli pUnt Power plant .Spray Lake " Hniid .Spray Luke Combating Ice Cost, AnnuEil. How Fort sile " Klliow River site (ih(i"t Hrvcr Kite .M iiwion site " Uiidnor site Coat Development , Bow Fort site " " Klbow River site " " Cihost site " " Miasion site " " Radnor site " Estimatew. Tables No. 6— No. 7 " Regulation Haaiaa, Kunanuskia River " Storage, How l,ake " " ElUiw River *' " Kaaanl> «4 "' «0 •4 80 10 37 27 32 32 38 70 B^ 70 ;i 74 74 80 82 81 »9 II* , Klbow Hirer development . . .....'.......' Ghost dt»velopment Kanan:L.,>kis plant " MiHsiun development " Radnor dovtpmaat Formation of Ice shei-i ^ " Frasil lec> Forty Mile Ctaek Ffmsilloe Catas, Taintar, Kananulii.i plant Qaucinf Stations, additional Oeolodcal Board, State of Washington General, Auxiliar.v Htorage " Baker Creek " Benelitsof Storage, Bow River Bow Ljike Storage Basin Bow River " Brewster Creek " Elbow River " Ghoat River " Hector Luke " Johnaon Creak " Kananaakis River " Pipestone Creek Qboat River, Capacity of storage *' Drainage Area " Discharge " General " Reoonnaiaeanoe '* Regulation Storage Basin... ' Storage Poasibilitiee .. \ ■ Topographical Survey. " rnderflow Ghoat Site Development ... . Canal ;; " Dam L " Dam, Diufharging capacity. ^ ' Estimate*! AnnuafChargea " Estimated Cost of plant ^ " Estimated Total Capital Coat .. " Forebay ; ■• Head ^ " Intake ^ " Penstocks ^ " Power Station and Equipment .'.'.. ^ " Po»er % Time Curve Plata No. 23 ^ " Storage Charge's ^ " Transnii.^ion Charges --, . ,. " Wat*-." Supply Grouting, Horseshoe Falls plant " Ka.ianaskis Falls plant . . Gnind. , ' An.!hor Ice) Hand ;i,« , Fort aite ^'.scadesite ■ I'll Claire plant t^lUow River sita Ghoat River aite rsoa. 4t 111 W 119 U M in « 49 111 9* U tl> S9 M ai t SI » 33 33 34 39 33 136 10 17 IS 1 30 i 15 IDS 109 SR 41 83 61 1« 18 3 1« 42 1 8 141 138 134 99 10 139 lOS 130 114 in 118 114 130 130 130 ISO 3 131 130 S IS S8 S7 S8 S7 S7 S9 S9 S9 98 SI S8 SS S8 148 S9 S9 »7 3« 39 17 44 8S 33 109 ISO 1 I NHCMCorr imouinoN tbt chait (ANSI ond ISO TEST CHART No. 7) 1.0 I.I 112 13.6 12.2 yo Blj25 iu I 1.6 A /1PPLIED IfvKjE Inc in] Enl Hower 11 " J'pper Reconnaissance of River. General " *' Diacharge " " Drainage Area " Ren lating Basins Kanunaskis Hiver Regulating Basins No. I " •■ •■ .Vo. 2 Dam " Discharging Capacity ..... " Grouting " Ininection Tunnels " Table of diseharge No. • Power—' ; Time Curve No, JO . " Station and Equipment. .. . '* Pressure Tubes _ " Relatioa to C.P.R. bridge Tainter Gat4M Turbines No. 3 No. ) Canaritv of No. 3 Erfect of Table No. 14, Discbarge Table No. 14 . No. I.l " " No, 16 34 39 33 92 «1 IM 3 34 37 3« 34 38 30 38 3» 3« 38 3» 3< 38 37 3« 135 74, 136 13S 109, US 98 M n IS 17 17 143 18 17 18 It It 17 It 21 2« 38 2,43 2 4 5 147 147 49 S8 3t 42 K «1 127 128 127 3 128 39 39 42 39 41 41 41 41 14(1 42 42 :i9 42 42 Hi; II' ll> 115 119 119 117 118 lit III It* 120 130 120 131 BOW RlVtlR POWER AND 8T0RAQE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e 341 KanaiMskis River Remlatiiig Basins Discharge Table No. 17.. „ ., '■ No- 3 Annual Charges. No. 3, Cost Kananaskis River Source . " ^°\ '■ ^"' '* '"'"'" '""» • ." ", iStorage possibilities , . , „ „ Topographical Survey , , „ , Tributaries Lake, Baker " Bow " Hector " Kananaskis '* I.«uise ''' " Minnewanka " Ptarmigan " Spray .'.....". " Louise Development " Redoubt Ukes in Storage Section of Bow River Leakage Horaeahoe Falls Plant Limiting Levels .Minnewanka Storage Basin Loads. Peak, Calgary Low Water Discharge V»i,.."a... ^ ii, . Bow River at kananaskU Faiu.\ . Maine, State oj. Water Supply Commission Manipuutlon of Storage . Market, Power Massachusett.^— Deerfiejd River Materials for Hydraulic Fill Methods of combating ice troubles . . . Methods of Investigation Metering Stations, Table No. 1 Minnewanka Continuous Flow l.W c.f.s. PLite No 10 Minnewanka, Fkiw, Table No. It No. 12...! No. 13 Storage Basin Clearing *' Limiting levels ^ "^ Dam, Changes in ,, *' " Construction " effwt of, at Horseshoe Fails, Plate No 15 Process of filling, Plate No. 10 ;; ;; ;; no. u. .;;■;;;::::;:;■ „. . '' . I-«ke, Topographical Survey of Mission Site " Development I " Canal I] *' Dam ^ " Dam Discharging ^ [I Capacity ^ " Fjitimated Annual Charges ^ Estimated Cost of Plant . " Forebay,...- " •' Head „ " Intake ^^ " Penstocks " Power Station Kquipment f ""W percentage of Time Curve Plate No. Storage Charges Total Capital Cost ' Traasmissioo Charges u. 1. •■ ^ .. Water Supply Mitchell, C. H., recommendations Moathly mean discharge. Bow River, Plate No. 1 [', " Cascade Kiver, Plate No. 13 Elbow River, PUite No. 4 .,„ . ,. . . . **P™y River, Plate No. 5 . • Moutonae Anchor Ice . , Montreal Flood Commission's Report on Ice Formatioa .>ew » ork State, C onservation Commission . . <>.. 1. J ",„*''M''''*''PPl.v (Commission (Jntario Hydro-Electric Commission Operation, Diagram of Storage, Spray Ijike " of Plant. Effect of Winter Con^'itioBs Organiiation of Invesligutions 'J"'P"!' Power, How River, Table No. 4 Peak Ixiads Penstocks, Bow Fort Site ,y. ....'.'.','. " Cascade .*4ite Elbow River Site Gboat Site Horseshoe Falls plant Mission Site Radnor Site Pipeetone Creek, General Discharge ■ " Drainage Area ■ Sloran PnaaibiUtiaa Plant, Cool of Bern Fort Sit* rAOi. 121 iig ll» 119 US 117 116 113 12S 47 124 116 .13 72 12S «4 84 I2S 13 38 78 43 30 41 7 134 42 8 92 21 4,^ 3 74 84 82 82 80 78 78 78 134 74 80 82 3 91 SI 53 52 52 52 U M « n n M u I4t M U M tl t 10 *l at » i « 41 M .s M M IM 111 lit j ''I I 342 DEPARTMENT OF TBE lyTERIOR 6 GEORGE v., A. 1916 Ptaot, Cost DlGho»t Bite [[['.]'.'.'.'.'■'■^'■■'■■'■'■'■'■'■ '• MiwionSite Radaor Site ..'.'.'.'. Plant, Cement '.' Poeaible Developmenta KwerD»m, Elbow Eiver •' DemMnd " Developments . • ■ •■•;■• -.■■ " Develcnment, Bow Fort Site^ ..•■ .. " Cascade Eiver Site Deerfiell R-. U.S.A . " Enu Claire plant « " Elbow River Site u " Ghost Site ^...._- Horseshoe Faltaplsnt^ „ •• Kanaanskis Falls plant « " l*ke Louise plant « " Mission Site „ M Radnor Site Power Market Power Output, from '^'^'^-^ , ■ i^ " Plant, Temporary, Spray L«Ke " Bates ;.••■.■■■;. '.".'.'.'.' " Rijhta, Applications lor Section Bow River •■ Section Elbow River " Sites Table No. 3 " Situatiot. Calgary ■ _• ^^_, v;. • ■ Power Station and EQU.pment, B^^^ afvS Site . ! ! ", u " Eau Claire plant „ .< Elbow Ri«r Site GhostSite ....■■■•• Honeehoe Falls plant. „ .1 Kaauaskis Falls plant " „ .. Mission Site Radnor Site... Power, % Tim. Curve, Bojjort 8i« PUJ. No. 21. -■-::.■.■.: :: :: IEb;?i:2SS;M::::::;:::::: .; Precedents tor Investijation Precipitation, General. . -j; j- ;j- " Awiiracy o( Records •• Distribution ol " Fluctuation in ... • Relation to Altitude „ " Run-on " Value ol Records...;..-. ■■■,■ : .. Val«o.Record..*rAJ««....-....-..-- ■••;;. PreMure Tubes Kananaskis plant Products. Clay ™ . ij„' V ?;S?J^rdrfeL^»HorLhoeF..Upl«it..... .......... . Public V tilities, Caljary Radnor Sile_... ....■•_• Development_^ u •• Estimated Annual Chanes _ >• •• Cost, total... ..-^-: „ .. Cost o( plant. Capital Cost Z ■• " Storage Charies Z .< " Transmission Charges M " Forebay . " Head u •' InUke : '.; P^^'^i Tim. Curve, Plate No. M... Power Station and Equipment RaJter, on Value or Precipitation Records .....■•■.• RatAM Fitwer. Table No. !*> , ■ , ■ . — g:SJ^;r.ie oC Baker Cr«k ««1 Uke. ..........■•■; ^ Bow l,ake . Rn-wster Creek Elbow River Ghost River Hector Lake..... •• Johnson Crsek yiJi' Kananaskis River and Lake Pipestone Creek Spray River and Lake R«»rds of Evaporation, ■)VV^'!' *,,. ^^' Precipitation, Appendix V III... Kiver Discharge. Appendni V II Temperature, Appendii lA Value o« pi ecipitat ion /_: ^^ j, R««mmendatioBs by C.H. Mitchell, C.E Hedearth Creek 64 87 2 4S 108 2 33 48 M 8 33 IM 58 34 38 84 51 80 42 141 «3 43 2 l-U 10« 4 42 49 109 M 36 39 S3 62 140 148 140 140 146 146 8 23 26 26 23 23 28 24 24 24 42 2 70 42 80 8i 61 64 84 81 84 84 61 81 81 82 148 82 24 41 3 a 1 S 2 3 3 3 3 3 32» 287 1*8 301 24 • 128 BOW RIVER POWER AND STORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e 3«3 TAOl. BacuUtion ol 8tor»«e jM •• storage Ghost River... •■■ IM „ >^~„-^ .. CapBcityof 117 ■< " Kaiuiiaskia River IIK u u " " Basin No. 1 .. . ii8 u « .. " Basin No. 2 ... 118 u « •< " Basin No. 3 ... iJO u „ « « EffectoINo.3A .... 121 „ « •■ " " No.3B 122 „ .. " " Estimated Annual Charge 123 " £«t'"I'^° ', ■ w 1 123 „ „ •• •• " Cost o( power from No. J 23 ReUtion of Altitude to Precipitation.... .... 39 " CP.R. brid«etoKanana»kiB plant.. ^.. ...... 121 Re.,.lUo(AuiiU.ryStorjfce,Kan««ldsR.ve%TableNo.l6. ........ ^..... ,21 Storage, TableNo. 21 i';: i! ! i! i'.;;:.;!! :' ^' ^'.^•'■■- ••••■■ ■■••■■■• '?S " No'. 23..."'!''! '..'..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. * BesulU of Storage Investigations, Table No. 4 5 ResulU of Survej-s ' Resume of Work „• J™ Reporu,G. L. Albert. Spraj- Dam 157 •• G. R.U.Conway, Spray Dam 37 " J R Freeman, Horseshoe Plant 106 " C H Mitchell, Elbow River 18 " Montreal Flood Commission •■ ■ ■ 43 K A. Ross, Power in Calgary 30 Sauder, P. M, on Floods on Bow River 2 Scope of Investigations and Ormniiation 92 Schuyler, T. D., ou Hydraulic FUl Dams 18 Sheet Ice, Formation of " Site, Bow Fort ~ " Ghost ■ ?• " Kananaskis FalU Plant 51 " Mission *; " Radnor ..■■. * Sites. Power, Table No. 3 f* Site of Spray Lake Dam >'» Source Kananaskis River ... .^. !«' Spillway, Bow Lake Storage Dam »« Spray Lakes ■ • .■ • ■ ■ , 5! Spray Lake Basin, Area and Capacity ol 8» " Capacity Curve M " Clearing •' " Constmction Road OT Estimated Cost of Storage » " Storage Operation 96 " Temporary pUnt 9» Trails , «} Spray Lake Dam, Dimensions of »J Spillway of » Spray Lake Dam Site » Spray Lakes, Reconnaissance ol ■ J •< ToDoffraDhical Surveys of .;,.■*■»,■; " Spray River, DiigSS Mean Mootily Discharge, Plate No. S |8 " Discharge 5* ti Gener&l "^ Spray River and UkM;Reounnaisjan<» erf ...j-^^. IM Sprav Storage, Effect ol at Horaeshoe Falls, Plate No. 15 8 SUte ol Washington, Geological Board ^•"^ Agreement between bept. oi Interior «d Calory Power Co. re Lake Minnewwika.. . . ■■■;;■■■::::::;: ,2-84 " Ar«a of Minnewanka Basin 142 " Auliliary, General .„ ^. {« " at Power Sites. Table No 24,^..... tM " Basins, Capacities of. Table No. 18 78 " " Constnietion of Minnewanka.. 134 " Cost of Bow River, Table No. 19 135 " Cost of U.S.A., Table No. 20 148 " " Ice Conditions below 78 " " Ijike Minnewanka ■ 78 " Limiting Levels, Minnewanka 84 " Spray I^kea ' " TableNo.2 •*♦ " Tableof » •• Benefits of. Table No. 5... .. !» •■ Bow Ukn, Basin, Proonse of Filling •• Capacity of »™» " " Constnietion Difficulties 101 Dam .^ IM Estimated Cost of M Investigation of JOB Manipulatioa lOt Spillway.... :;:;.'.;;:;.; n " Cspacity of Minnewanka Basin,... M " Charges. Estimated, Bow Fort Site 59 •• " " Ghost M .. " " Mission " M •< " ■' Radnor " 344 DEPAirTMEyr of tbe interior 5 GEORGE v., A. ISIS Stonte Cost of, Table " " " No. fl " . Curvee, Nu«. 20, 21, 22, 23. 24 " * ConcluaioDs " D:.ii, Elbow River .; ■ ;i .v ' ■ ■ " Diagrams, Platea Noa. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 •' Elbow Hiver ■ " Effect , Elbow Kiver, DiBgram of " Effect of, below Calgary " Estimated Coat of. Table ,■;■•••.■•■ " Investigations, Results of, '. ablea 4 and B . " Manipulation, General " Operation, Spray Lakes Basin Policy of tbe Departmtjat relating to Possibilities, Baker Creek Ghost River " " Johnson Creek •« " Kananaskis River " " Pipestone Creek " Regulating Basins.. Relation of, to Power Output ... "> ■^■,5' ,,„,»;.:. " Total effect of, at Horseshoe !■ alls, Plate No. 17. . . . . ; . . below Calgar>- on Bow River, Plato No. 19. Stream Beds of Storage Section, Bow River " .Measurements Structure, Type of, .Spray l-B Basin Substations. Horseshoe Falls i ant .^ Summary of Investigations. TaL!e No. 5 Surveys of Bow Uke " Bow River " Elbow River " Ghost River " Kananaskis River " Lake Minnewanka Surveys. Results of " of Spray Lakes Table No. 1. Metering Stations (Gauguig) " 2, Storage Basins " 3, Power Sites 4, Power Output, Bow River *' 5, Summar>- of Investijation ■• », Cost of Storage " 7, Cost of Power 8, Plants on Deerfield River 9. Power Rates, Calgary " 10, Discharge. Kananaskis Dam '• 11, Minnewanka .storage 12, " " 13, " •• " 14, Kananaskii, Storage 15, " " ,v 16, Results of Auiiliarj- Storage, Kananaskis 17, ■• " 18, Capacities of Storage Basins " 19, Cost of Storage Basin. Bow Kiver 2«. " " U.S.A 21 . Results of Storage, 1909-10 22, " 1910-11 23, " 1911-12 24. Auiiliar\- Storage at Power Sites Tables, Discharje Minnewanka Storage Basin Tables, Showing Huiiliary Storage Capacities of Storage Basins. " EfftctofStorage.Nos. 21,22, 23 Estimated Cost of .Storage Tainter Gates, Kananaskis Falls Plant Temperature ■ . .; rischargo Curve, Plate No. 2 PAOl. 131 « .135,137,138,139.143 141 10» 74,80,82 104-113 140 141 103 4,5 143 90 73 126 130 128 117 125 118 141 137 138 139 135 11 141 143 140 140 13 " In.1uence of. upon Evaporation .'. 27 " Influenc • of. upon Discharge ■ ■ Temporary Power Plai t. Spray Lakes Basin Topographical features of Bow River Basin survey of Bow Lake " " Bow River " " Elbow River " •' Ghost River... " " Kananaskis River " " .Minnewanka Ijike " " Spray Lake ' . Trail". Spray Ijlke Basin ,„■■,;_ „.. Transmission Charges, Estimated. Bow Fort Site " u u OhoBt.Site 31 90 3« 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3. 86 3 3 4 4 5 6 • 8 41 43 77 82 83 120 120 m 121 134 134 135 137 138 13» 143 80 143 140 13.'. 138. 139 103 42 26 27 27 26 143 96 10 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 »« 50 59 BOW RlXr.U POWER A\n IfTORAOE SESSIONAL PAPER No. 25e Transmiiwion Charges, Estiinated. Mimion Site . Transmimion Lines. Horseshoe Falls Plant Tributaries ot the Bow Kiver in Storaje Section. Tubes, Pressure, Kananaskis Falls Plant Tunnel, Spray Lake Dam, Inwatering Turbines, Kananaskis Falls Plant Underflow, Bow River anil Tributaries " Ell>ow River " Ghost River Unwatering Tunnel. Spray Lakes Dam Utilities, Public, of Calga 34S M 3« 11 42 93 42 13 2», IDS 29 93 I