^>. 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-S) 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 'I'm iiiiM 
 
 • ii2 ill 2.2 
 
 IIIIM 
 
 1.8 
 
 
 1.25 1.4 
 
 1.6 
 
 ■ ; 
 
 ^ 
 
 6" — 
 
 
 — ■ ► 
 
 v2 
 
 v> 
 
 rf> 
 
 
 
 r> 
 
 / 
 
 y 
 
 >^ 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 ,\ 
 
 «■ 
 
 s? 
 
 \\ 
 
 lV 
 
 U. 
 
 o 
 
 % 
 
 73 WEST MAIN S/REET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY M580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
 <i' 
 
 "f- 
 
 -v^^ 
 
CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICIVIH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut canadien de microreproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notas/Notes tachniquas at bibliographiquat 
 
 Tha 
 to tl 
 
 Tha Inatituta has attamptad to obtain tha bast 
 original copy available for filming. Faaturas of this 
 copy which may ba bibliographically unique, 
 which may altar any of tha images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 □ Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 □ Covers damaged/ 
 Couverture endommagia 
 
 □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restauria et/ou pelliculAe 
 
 DS 
 
 D 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 
 titre de couverture manque 
 
 □ Coloured maps/ 
 Cartes gdographiquas en couleur 
 
 □ Coloured inic (i.e. other than blue or blacic)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Ralii avac d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 La reliure serrde peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion la long da la marge intirieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within tha text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans la texte, 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas iti filmias. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentairas suppldmentaires: 
 
 L'Institut a microfilm^ la meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a AtA possible de se procurer. Les details 
 da cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 una image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mithoda normala de filmage 
 sont indiquAs ci-dassous. 
 
 I — I Coloured pages/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endom magmas 
 
 Pages restored and/oi 
 
 Pages restaurtes et/ou paiiicui^es 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxei 
 Pages dicoiorAes, tachetias ou piquies 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d6tach6es 
 
 Showthrough> 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Quality inigale de {'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materii 
 Comprend du materiel suppldmentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 I — I Pages damaged/ 
 
 I — I Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 
 r~7l Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 
 I I Pages detached/ 
 
 r~^ Showthrough/ 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 |~~| Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 I — I Only edition available/ 
 
 The 
 pos 
 oft 
 film 
 
 Ori( 
 beg 
 the 
 sior 
 oth( 
 first 
 sior 
 or il 
 
 The 
 she 
 TIN 
 whi 
 
 Mai 
 diff 
 enti 
 beg 
 righ 
 reqi 
 met 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalament ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 6tA filmies d nouveau de fapon d 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmA au taux de reduction indiqu* ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 J 
 
 20X 
 
 26X 
 
 30X 
 
 24X 
 
 28X 
 
 32X 
 
ills 
 
 du 
 
 differ 
 
 jne 
 
 lage 
 
 The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 IMilislMtmorisI Library 
 IMcMatttr Univaraity 
 
 The imagea appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in Iceeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 L'exemplaire filmA fut reproduit grice A la 
 gAnirositA da: 
 
 MilliMsmorial Library 
 McMattor Univtriity 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6tA reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition at 
 de ia netteti de l'exemplaire filmA. et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimAe sont film6s en commen^ent 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 derniire page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires 
 originaux sont filmis en commenpant par la 
 premiere page qui comporte une emprei.tte 
 d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la derni^re page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 The Hast recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol ^»> (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning "END "). 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la 
 derniftre image de cheque microfiche, selon le 
 cas: le symbols — »> signifie "A SUIVRE ", le 
 symbole V signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre 
 filmte A des taux de rMuction diffirents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour §tre 
 reproduit en un seul cliche, il est filmi A partir 
 de Tangle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite. 
 et de haut en bas. en prenant le nombre 
 d'images n^cessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mithode. 
 
 rata 
 
 
 
 lelure. 
 
 □ 
 
 32X 
 
 1 2 3 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
•v - i.^.r^np«B^^«9^! 
 
 \o 
 
 A^ 
 
 .D 
 
 Pi 
 
 PK 
 
 \ 
 
 *^' 
 
A MANUAL 
 
 OF 
 
 Practical Conveyancing. 
 
 I 
 
 REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY, 
 
 INCLUDING WILLS. 
 
 PRECEDENTS, FORMS AM) REFERENCES. 
 
 Bv 1). A. O'SULLIVAN, LL.H., 
 
 liMfKlSfKH AT-I.AU, 0,S<,()|)1>1; IIaI.I., 
 
 Author of -A .V/</Ni<.i/o/G();v)«»,<-/i/i,g*|vl/»Q"y^tQlJ£. "^ ^ 
 
 
 JliLL 
 
 liAsr. 
 
 U.6'0. 
 
 TORONTO : 
 CARSWKLL iT- CO., LAW PL 
 
 r ^, 26 AM) 28 ADlit.AIDE SlKlilir. 
 
 O.U. 
 
 SIIERS, 
 
 i88j. 
 
 ^.- 
 
ICntrn'd arrorilini; lo Art nt tlif I'aili.iiiK lit nt (".iii.iiln, in tlu yt-iiv one tlioiwand pi>;lit 
 hiiiuln il and «-i;;lity-t\vi), li\ 1>. A. O'Sl i.l.n as, in tlie oflici' of ilic Miiiisln ot 
 Acrii-iiltnic. 
 
 -A.I 
 
 MOOHl; i"t ( o., 
 
 I'KINTI RS, 20 AKKI.AIIIK SI REBT EA T, 
 TORONTO. 
 
DKDICATKD HY PERMISSION 
 
 TO THE 
 
 35onourablc .3lohn l^atohius J^ixqnvU), B.OT.Jf., 
 
 •KESinE.N1 OF THE 
 
 UH.H COURT OF JUSTICE FOR ONTARIO. 
 
 / 
 
pn 
 th( 
 tlic 
 
 IlJH 
 
 to 1 
 not 
 cnt 
 dec 
 raai 
 ma< 
 it 01 
 peel 
 inte 
 or c 
 
 Ii 
 
 been 
 
 writi 
 
 to. 
 
 liav€ 
 
 Gree 
 
 Ifayi 
 
 write 
 
 Hall 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 In the following pages the writer has given all the 
 prominence possible to a discussion of the law regarding 
 the ordinary points that arise in Conveyancing, leaving 
 the special conveyancer to lind elsewhere what may suit 
 his purpose. He has also devoted less space than is usual 
 to forms and precedents, not because good precedents are 
 not desirable, but because in courts of justice in the pres- 
 ent day the rights of the parties under an instrument are 
 decided, if possible, by the intention rather than the 
 manner of expressing it. Even in conveyancing the 
 magic of a set word or phrase is fast losing the importance 
 it once possessed ; and one may not be extravagant in ex- 
 pecting to see the time when parties will be bound by their 
 intentions, no matter whether the formalities of contracts 
 or conveyances have been disregarded or not. 
 
 In regard to the plan of this work, no English author has 
 
 been followed, but such portions of the works of the best 
 
 writers as are ustiful in this Province have been adverted 
 
 to. The admirable works of ^^r. Deane and Mr. Prideaux 
 
 have been kept in view as to points of law — that of Mr. 
 
 Greenwood as to practical instructions, and that of Mr. 
 
 Hayes for precedents and otherwise. Almost every other 
 
 writer of the two dozen or so on the shelves at Osgoode 
 
 Hall have been referred to. In more than one subject use 
 o's.c. B 
 
 1^ 
 
 I 
 
vi. 
 
 PllEFACE. 
 
 has been made of the voluminous roforences of Mr. Addi- 
 son. The chapter on PcrHonal Property, it is liopcd, will 
 nflford a connected view of the suhject, and will refer to the 
 latest authorities on the positions taken. The admirable 
 work of Mr. JJenjamin on Sales, and the works of Herman 
 and Jones on (.'battel Mort^aRes, have been frequently 
 used, as also the elaborate work of Mr. Barron on our 
 Kevised Statute on the latter subject. It is the only 
 chapter in which the writer relied on his own considerable 
 experience in this part of the subject, and in some points 
 insisted up(m he is aware of not being quite in accord with 
 several members of the liar. 
 
 The writer was more likelv to "o astrav from the excess 
 of authorities than otherwise; and although positions taken 
 in the work may not prove ultimately to be the luw, it will 
 not be because no authority can be found to support them. 
 
 The writer is under lasting obligations to several dis- 
 tinguished members of the Ontario ]W' for the assistance 
 he received in various parts of the following work ; and 
 though a reference to their names may raise higher expec- 
 tations in these pages than may be realized, the reader 
 might have been otherwise misled or disappointed if the 
 assistance was not availed of. The fact that a work of this 
 kind is capable of being, if necessary, written by several 
 lawyers, and yet be not inconsistent, induced the writer to 
 solicit assistance on disputed points in almost every chapter. 
 Though it would be unfair to the gentlemen from whose 
 opinions he has profited to rest the responsibility of every- 
 thing in the book upon their shoulders, it can at least be 
 said they have lessened the defects in the original manu- 
 script. In an especial w'ay, Mr. Moss, Q.C., in the first 
 chapter, and Mr. S. H. Blake, Q.C., in the last — the Chapter 
 on Wills — have taken great pains to improve the manuscript. 
 
PREFACE. 
 
 VII. 
 
 As may bo expected, the first chapter was in many respects 
 the most diilicult to dispoHc of satisfactorily. 
 
 Mr. Maclennan, Q.C., called attention to several points 
 in tlie chapter on Leases, which he went over very 
 minutely ; and the chapter on Titles was submitted to Mr. 
 Kose, Q.C., for suj^gestions. Mr. Taylor, Q.C., extended 
 the courtesy of reading over the chapter on Sales of Land, 
 nnd made some notes for consideration; he also khidly 
 allowed the writer the use of Clardenor's Directions for 
 ])rawing Abstracts, which have been referred to at length 
 under the Precedents, Forms and ItefereUces. In the same 
 way the chapter on agreements was referred to Mr. Lount, 
 <^).C., whose suggestions were incorporated into the text. 
 
 The indexes have been kindly prepared for the work by 
 A[l\ John B. Jackscm, B.A., and A[r. Chas. L. Mahony, 
 Students-at-Law — the latter having, on a previous occa- 
 sion, done a similar task for the writer. 
 
 I 
 
 D. A. O'S. 
 
 December, 1881. 
 
 ■4 
 I 
 
 12 Elgin Avenue, Yorkville. 
 
/ 
 
 II 
 
 IV 
 
 CI 
 
 I 
 
 II 
 III 
 
 IV. 
 V. 
 
 VI 
 
 I. 
 II. 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 INTROIHCTOUY CIIAPTKlt 1-29 
 
 I, Prki.iminarv. 
 II. Pakiiks : 
 
 I. Th« ('rown. 
 (Corporations. 
 Trustees. 
 lIuKband and wife. 
 Infants. 
 Lunatics. 
 7. Uther disabilities. 
 
 III. SiitjKcr Ma riKH oK THE Con- 
 
 tract AND Law governing 
 
 IT. 
 
 IV. Short iokms ok Convkyanc- 
 
 INfi 
 
 2. 
 
 •»• 
 tt. 
 
 v. Hkcitai.s, 
 VI, Datk. 
 
 VII. I>l I'l.ICATK. 
 
 VIII. Kxi:( inioN : 
 
 1. SiRuature. 
 
 2. Sealing. 
 
 3. Delivery. 
 
 IX. WrtNKSSING ANO ProOP OF 
 
 KxKc irrioN. 
 X. Ai.TKRATioN. Cancellation. 
 
 KTC. 
 
 XI. Keoistration. 
 
 CIIAl'TEU II 30-47 
 
 TITLK TO HLAL AND PICRSONAL PKOPKKTV. 
 I. HKAL 1: STATE. 
 
 1. PRKI.I.MINAKV. 
 II. Sot.lCIIOKS AnsTUAfT. 
 III. KKCHSTRAR S AllSTKACT. 
 IV'. VkNI'OR and Pl'Kr.HASEK Af'T 
 V. CkoUN (iUANr AND liAKLY 
 kHfilSTKATIONS. 
 
 VI. Particular TiTLKs: 
 
 1. Possession. 
 
 2. Wills. 
 
 3. Inheritance. 
 
 4. Decree. 
 
 VII 
 
 5. Power of sale. 
 
 f). Vestin(< ojder. 
 
 7. Lis Pendens. 
 
 8. Mechanic s liens, 
 y. Insolvency. 
 
 10. Ta.\ titles. 
 
 , OTHKR liNCCMURANl es 
 
 1. Liens. 
 
 2. H >nds. 
 
 3. Writs. 
 
 4. Arrears of ta.\es. 
 
 II. PERSONAL PROPERTY. 
 
 I. Preliminary, 
 II. Searchks : 
 
 I. County Court Office. 
 
 2. Sheriffs and Pailif^'s Office. 
 
 3. Rent in arrears. 
 
 4. Liens. 
 
 i 
 I 
 
z. 
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER III 48-07 
 
 AGRKEMENTS. 
 
 I. 
 II. 
 
 HI. 
 
 IV. 
 V. 
 
 Prei.i.minarv. 
 
 Voin CoNTKACTS: 
 
 1. Immoral consideration. 
 
 2. Contrary to Statute Law. 
 
 3. Contrary to Public: I'Dlicy. 
 
 VoiDABI.K CoNTKACTS: 
 
 1. Infants, &c. 
 
 2. Mistake. 
 
 J. Failure of consideraiion, 
 
 (^ONSIUKKATION. 
 AUIHKN TICATION OK CON- 
 TRACTS : 
 
 1. Contracts requiring a seal. 
 
 2. Written contracts not rt;- 
 <}uirins a seal. 
 
 3. Statutory Requisites. 
 
 VI. I'l.AN OF AgKEUEENT. 
 VII. SlMMAKY. 
 
 VIII. Conditions of Sale. 
 IX. Suu.sEyiENT Matters: 
 J. Discharge. 
 .'. Transfer. 
 3. Meiger. 
 
 CHAPTER IV 08-104 
 
 SALES OF LAND. 
 
 I. Prf.i-iminary. 
 
 
 2 
 
 11. Recitals. 
 
 
 .H 
 
 III. Considekation AND Receift 
 
 
 4 
 
 Clause, 
 
 
 5 
 
 IV. (iKANT and Feoffment. 
 
 
 6 
 
 V. NaTIKE ok (iKANT : 
 
 X 
 
 I 
 
 I. Life estate. 
 
 
 1 
 
 2. Fee tail. 
 
 
 2 
 
 3. Fee simple. 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 VI. Description. 
 
 
 4 
 
 VII. Easements. 
 
 
 ■) 
 
 /III. Habendum. 
 
 XL 
 
 s 
 
 IX. Covenants: 
 
 
 I 
 
 1. Title. 
 
 
 2 
 
 (,)uiet enjoyment. 
 
 Free from encumbrances. 
 
 I'urther assurance. 
 
 Production. 
 
 (ieneral release. 
 •^owek: 
 
 Marriage settlement. 
 
 Election. 
 
 Adultery. 
 
 Alimony. 
 
 Dower in wild lands. 
 St'BSEyiENT, Matters. 
 
 Vendors liens. 
 
 Interest, costs, «S:c. 
 
 CHAPTER V 105-132 
 
 LEASES. 
 
 1. 
 
 II. 
 
 HI. 
 
 IV. 
 
 V. 
 
 Preliminary. 
 Les.sor's Title. 
 Leases — How Made : 
 
 1. Agreements for leases. 
 
 2. Void leases as agreements. 
 Parol Leases. 
 
 1. Lessor's obligations and 
 
 rights. 
 
 2. Lessee's obligations and 
 
 rights. 
 Leases by Deed : 
 
 1. Short forms. 
 
 2. Habendum. 
 
 3. Reddendum. 
 
 VI. 
 
 VII. 
 
 4. Covenants : 
 
 (rt) Pay rent and taxes. 
 
 (/») Repair. 
 
 (r) Keep up fences — Not 
 
 cut down timber. 
 {<i) Nut assign, nor sublet. 
 («•) yuiet enjoyment. 
 
 5. Proviso for re-entry. 
 Determination of Tenancy: 
 
 1. Forfeiture. 
 
 2. Effluxion of time. 
 
 3. Notice. 
 
 4. Surrender. 
 Distress. 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 XI. 
 
 CHAPTEK VI 133-155 
 
 I. MOKTCJAGIiS OF LAND. 
 
 I. 
 
 rKEI.IMINARy. 
 
 VII 
 
 11. 
 
 AlJVA.NCKS— SliCURITV. 
 
 VIII 
 
 ii. 
 
 TnK Statutorv I'okm oi" 
 
 IX 
 
 
 MoRTC.ACiES. 
 
 X 
 
 IV. 
 
 RE( 1TAI..S. 
 
 
 V, 
 
 ESTATK ("l.Al SK. 
 
 XI 
 
 VI. 
 
 TkOVISO FOR KlCDEMPTION. 
 
 XII 
 
 VII. Personai- Covenant. 
 Other Covena.vts. 
 I'mvER OF Sale or Leasino. 
 The Statutory Power of 
 
 Sale. 
 Dower. 
 Rights oi- the Parties. 
 
 II. DISCHARGES OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 CPIAPTER VII 156-175 
 
 ASSIGNMENTS. 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 II. .\ssignmi:nt ok Leases. 
 
 III. As.SI.iNMENT OK MORTGAGES. 
 
 IV. Choses in .\ction. 
 V. Particular Assignment.s : 
 
 1. Stock, Shares, etc:. 
 
 2. Copyright. 
 
 3. Patent right. 
 
 4. Trade marks — Dt'sigiis. 
 
 5. Insurance policies. 
 
 CHAPTER VIII 176-215 
 
 PERSONAL PROPERTY. 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 
 II. Divisions of Personal Pro- 
 perty. 
 
 III. Gifts of Personal Property. 
 
 IV. Sales of Personal Property 
 
 at Common Law. 
 V. Sales of Personal Property 
 Under the Statute ok 
 Frauds : 
 
 1. The note or memorandum. 
 
 2. Goods, etc., within the 
 
 Statute. 
 VI. Sales and Mortgages under 
 R. S. O., c;ap. iiy ; 
 
 1. Scope and object of this 
 
 Statute. 
 
 2. Bona fides. 
 
 3. Good consideration. 
 
 4. (ioods and chattels within 
 
 this Act. 
 VII. Conveyances Under the 
 Revised Statute : 
 Points of similarity in con- 
 veyances of sales and 
 mortgages. 
 Points ot disagreement. 
 Form of conveyances under 
 the statute. 
 4. Rights of the parties there- 
 under. 
 VIII. Sales and Mortgages of 
 Vessels, 
 IX. Leases of Chattels. 
 
 I. 
 
 2. 
 3- 
 
 i 
 
xu. 
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER IX 210-251. 
 
 WILLS. 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 IL Soundness of Mind. 
 in. Undue Influence. 
 IV. Other Disabilities. 
 V. The Wills' Act of Ontario. 
 VI. Instructions for Drawing a 
 Will. 
 
 VII. Form, etc., of the In.stru- 
 
 MENT. 
 
 VIII. Execution : 
 
 1. Signature. 
 
 2. Witnesses, etc. 
 IX. Revocation. 
 
 X. Registration. 
 XI. I'robate. 
 
 PRECEDENTS FORMS AND REFERENCES UNDER 
 THE FOREGOINC CHAPTERS. 
 
 Introductory chapter 253 
 
 Title 2t»7 
 
 Agreements 270 
 
 Sales of land .174 
 
 Leases 283 
 
 Mortgages 28S 
 
 Assignments 2>h 
 
 Personal Property 303 
 
 Wills 311 
 
 Comparison of the statutes relating to conveyances and mortgages of 
 
 land 314 
 
 Statute respecting short forms of leases 332 
 
 Statute relating to sales and mortgages of chattel property as amended. 335 
 
TAr3LE OF CASES CITED. 
 
 Adams, re. 236. 
 Ad.Tiiis V. Loomis, 9, 281. 
 Allan V. I'isher, 42. 
 Allen V. I'licker, 131. 
 Allen V. Jackson, 234. 
 Amiss, re, 246. 
 Anderson v. Anderson, 242. 
 Anderson v. Kadclifle, 107. 
 Anderson v. Trott, 102. 
 Annis v. Corbett, lOi. 
 Archer, re, 244. 
 Ashford v. Hack, 159, 
 Aslimore, re, 246, 
 Att<)rney-(]eneral v. Day, 57. 
 Attcrney-Cieneral v. Fullerton, 117. 
 Atlorney-( General v. Hall, 233. 
 Attorney-(ieneral v. The Merrimac 
 Manufacturing Company, 182. 
 Attwater v. Attwater. 233. 
 Austin V. Houlton, iG(>. 
 Auworth V. Johnson, 116. 
 Ayliu}!;, re, 244. 
 Azema v. Casella, 52. 
 
 B 
 
 Ilabcock. re. 232. 
 
 Hacon. re. 23(). 
 
 iiacon %. Campbell, 127. 
 
 liailey, re. 244. 
 
 iJaker v. Dewey, 76. 
 
 Baldwin v. Duignan, 43. 
 
 liall V. Dunsterville, ly, 24. 
 
 Bandy v. Cartwright, 109, 114. 
 
 Bank of British North America v. 
 
 Simpson, 61. 
 Banks v. Goodfellow, 221. 
 Barber v. Davis, 234. 
 Barclay v. Kaine, 97. 
 Barnes V. Bellamy, 127. 
 Bartlett v. Jull, 150. 
 Bartlett v. Burneil, «)2. 
 Bartlett v. Wells, 9. 
 Barton v. Barton, 234. 
 
 Baskerville v. Otterson, 164. 
 
 Bateman v. Hotchkin, 8j 
 
 Bayley v. Fitzmaurice, ()0. 
 
 Bayley v. Williams, 13. 
 
 Baylis v. Dynely, 113 
 
 Beale v. Sanders, 112. 
 
 Beardman v. Wilson, 157. 
 
 Beaven v. McDonell, 12 
 
 Bellairs v. Bellairs, 234. 
 
 Bellamy v. Barnes, 127. 
 
 JSell V. Lee, 223, 
 
 liennetto v. Holden, 9. 
 
 Berry v. Ciarrard, 93, 143 
 
 Berry v. Heard. 215. 
 
 Berry v. Young, 104. 
 
 Bertram v. Bendrv, 207. 
 
 Berwick v. Whitfiehl, .Sj. 
 
 Bigelow V. Big(!low. 230. 
 
 Bigelow V. Staccy, 134. 
 
 Bird V. Fox, 32. 
 
 Biscoe V. Van Bearle, 84, 
 
 J-Jlackburn v. Smith, 32. 
 
 Bland v. I-^aton. ()o. 
 
 Bogart V. J'aterson, 100 
 
 Bonter v. Noithcote. 98. 
 Jiousfead v. Whitmore, 9. 
 Bower v. ]5rass, (^5, 
 Bower v. Cooper, (13. 
 Bowles V. Stewart, 84. 
 I?oys V. Rossliorough, 22.'. 
 Bradford v. Beltield, 147, 
 Bradford \ ()Brit:n, 53. 
 l^radley v, l'ei\oto, 234 
 l^rady v. Ki.'enan. 103. 
 l^randnn v. Robinson, 234. 
 Braniiiff. re, 243. 
 Brembridge v, Massev, 135. 
 Bremer V. Freeman, 241. 
 ISromley v. lirunton, 182. 
 Brooke v, Campbell, 43. 
 Broughton v. [ewel, 103. 
 Brown V. McNab, d. 
 Brown v. O'Dwyer, iS, ig, <)i, 
 Brumrit v. Martin, 66, \Ui. 
 Bryan v. Whyte, 239. 240 
 Buchanan v. Campbell, 75. 
 Bull V. Harper, 70, 103. 
 
XIV. 
 
 TABLE OF CASKS CITED. 
 
 Bunney v. Hopkinson, 04. 
 Hunteii V. fieor^en, 16S. 
 Burn V. Carvallo, 170. 
 Burnham v. (laivev, 90. 
 Burnham v. Waiklell, i.ji. 
 Byrd, re, 246. 
 
 Caldecott v. Brown, S3. 
 
 Cameron v. Spik:ii^, 59. 
 
 ('ampbell, re. loi. 
 
 Campbell v. Lewis, ()4. 
 
 Campbell v. l<oi)ins.<u. gf). 
 
 Campbell v. Sliields, 124 
 
 Canada Permainent Buildin,'? and 
 l^oan Society v. Yoari.^, 70. 
 
 Cannon v. Hartley, i;<!. 
 
 Carder v. Morgan, 148. 
 
 Carlisle v. Tait, 201. 
 
 Carrick v. Johnston, S7. 
 
 Cartwright v. Cartwrij^ht, 219. 
 
 Cawthra v. AieOuir^, 15.;. 
 
 Chainpney v. JMancliard, iSi, 
 
 Charles, ix parte, i6j. 
 
 Charles, r*-, 32. 
 
 Chetham v. Williamson, 121. 
 
 (^hisholm v. I 'otter, 212. 
 
 Chowne v. Haylis, 170. 
 
 Church V. Brown, 94, 110, iiS, 137, 
 
 Clariss v. Ellis, 41. 
 
 Clark, re, 244. 
 
 Clark V. lionnycastle, o, 87. 
 
 Clark V. Buchannn, 42. 
 
 Clark V. Hamilton and Gore Me- 
 chanics' Institute, 7. 
 
 Clarkson v. Kitson, 51. 
 
 ("lavering v. Clavering, S2. 
 
 Clement v. Donaldson, 24, 
 
 CMose V. .Melmont, ifii. 
 
 Clow V. Brogden, 162. 
 
 Cobb V. Stokes, 115, 117, 129. 
 
 Coe V. Clay, 114, 115. 
 
 Coit V, Stockweather, 27. 
 
 Colegrave v. Bias Santos, 8g. 
 
 Collard V. Bennett, 75. 
 
 Colman, re, 246. 
 
 Connell v. I'ower, 127, 128. 
 
 ('ook V. Jones, 43. 
 
 Cook V. Turner, 232. 
 
 Coomber V. Howard 119. 
 
 Cooper V. Emery, 104. 
 
 ("oopcr V. Willomatt, 209. 
 
 Corbett v. Taylor, 95. 
 
 Corbyn v. breiich, 28 r. 
 
 Corporation of Whitbv v. Liscombe 
 6. 
 
 Cotter V. Sutherland, 42. 
 
 Coulthard. ;v, 237. 
 
 Court V. Holland, 164. 
 
 j Cowling V. Dickson, 130 
 1 Cozens v. Ouut, 242. 
 : Cracknall v. Jansen, igi. 
 
 Crain V. ('raig, 89. 
 
 Craig V. Templetm, 99. 
 ; Crane v. The London Dock Co. 
 I Ciesswell v. (resiiwell, 24J. 
 ' Crocker v. Sowiien, 8. 
 i Croft V. Crolt, ^45. 
 i Croft V. Lumby, 126. 
 i ([^rusce d. Blencawe v. lU^'liy, i 
 j Cryslcr v. Creigiiton, 90. 
 ' Cnllen v. Nickerson, 23. 
 
 Cumniing v. Hill, iii. 
 
 Cummins v. Scott, 60. 
 
 Of 
 
 D 
 
 Dack V. Cnrric, 95. 
 
 Dadds, rr, 247. 
 
 Dagg V. Dagg, 251. 
 
 Dance v. (ioldingham, 66. 
 
 Daney v. Dnrant, 14S. 
 
 Daniel v. (Iracey, ui. 
 
 Dann v. .S(iinrior, 1 19. 
 
 Davenport v. Davenport, 99. 
 
 D.ividson V. lioomer, 100, 236. 
 
 Davidson v. McKay, 29. 
 
 D.iviH, re, 248. 
 
 1 )avis V. Evans, 203. 
 
 Davis . / (il. V. Mcpherson, 87. 
 
 Davis V. Sheppard, 88. 
 
 Davis V. Van Norman. 38. 
 
 Davison v. Stanley, 130. 
 
 Deare v. Elwyn, 221. 
 
 Dearie v. Hall, 170. 
 
 Dehart v. Dehart, 4. 
 
 Derby v. Taylor, lor. 
 
 De Hoo V. Foster, 9. 
 
 Devaynes v. Robinson, 149. 
 
 Dickerman v. Abrahams, 176. 
 
 Dilke v. Douglas, 154. 
 
 Dobbie v. Tully, 42. 
 
 Dodd V. Acklt-m, 131. 
 
 Dodds V. Durand, 184. 
 
 Doe d. .-Vnldjo v. Hallister, 44. 
 
 l>oe d. Haker v. Clark, 177. 
 
 Doe d. Biggard v. Millard, 21. 
 
 Doe d. Burnham v. Simmons, 44. 
 
 Doe V. Carter, 126. 
 
 Doe V. Co.\, 129. 
 
 Doe V. Crick, 129. 
 
 Doe d. Ellis v. McGill, 24. 
 
 Doe V. Eorster, 130. 
 
 Doe d. ClriHith v. IJoyd, 214. 
 
 Dee d. Jackson v. Wilkes, (>. 
 
 Doe d. Kemp v. Gardner, 112. 
 
 Doe V. Marchetti. 129. 
 
 Doe d. Meyers v. Marsh, 90. 
 
 Doe d. Murray v. Smith, 88. 
 
TABLE OF CASKH t ITKI). 
 
 XV. 
 
 Doe d. Pitt V. Horr, 158. 
 Doe d. Sheldon v. K.imsny, 6. 
 Doe d. Shore v. I'iirker, im). 
 Doe d. Shore v. I'orter, iij. 
 Doe V. Smith, 1.50. 
 Doe d. Thompson v. Ainey, 113. 
 Doe d. Wood v. I'ox, ()(), lOh. 
 Dominion Loan Society v. Darling, 
 
 Doon V. D.ivis, 251. 
 Douglas V. Murphy, 161. 
 Dove V. Dove, 1 15, i.i^. 
 Drake v. \\ igle, 83. 
 Draper, re. 239, 240. 
 Drilfil V. McFall, 102. 
 Dudley v. Warde, .H3. 
 Duffy V. Smith. 27. 
 Duncombe v. M.iyer, 84. 
 Dunk V. Hunter, 132. 
 Dunn V, Turner, 87. 
 Durance, ir, 24(1. 
 Dyer v. liouley, 122. 
 
 !•: 
 
 Kagles, re, 10 1. 
 liarl lieauchamp v. Winn, 5J 
 Karls V. McAlpine, ,i;i2. 
 Last V. Troyfoid, 237. 
 Kccles V. L(jwry, 12. 
 ICckersley v. I'latt, 247. 
 Kdge v. Strafford, 58, 117. 
 lidwards v. Edwards, 240. 
 Lgleson v. Houe, itVj. 
 Flliott V. McConnell, 164. 
 Elsworthy v. Hevvett, 126. 
 Ernes V. Ernes, 220. 
 Emmett v. (Juinn, 123. 
 Evanturel v. Evanturel, 232. 
 Charles, ex parte, 107. 
 Johnson, ex parte, 154. 
 
 Fallon V. Keenan, 143. 
 Farlinger v. McDonald, 203, 204. 
 I'anjuhar v. The City of Toronto, 
 
 170. 
 Earrar v. Nightingale, 1S4. 
 Farrar v. Winterton, 24O. 
 Featherstone v. McDonell, 9. 
 Fcnn V. Uittlestone, 215. 
 Ferguson v. Freeman, 43. 
 I'landers v. Barstow, 203. 
 Flight V. Hooth, 162. 
 Flint V. Smith, 102. 
 Fullis V. I'orter, 70. 
 Forrest v. L.iycock, 151. 
 Forster v. Haggart, 148. 
 
 Forsyth v. Hoyle. 87. 
 I'oster V. (ieddes. 24. 
 Francis v. St. (Jermain, 12. 
 Iranklin, re, 43. 
 Fraser v. Bank of Toronto, 20- 
 Ftasur v. I'ralick, 28. 
 I'raser v. J-raser, 22, 25. 
 I'rith v. Osborne, 149. 
 Fry V. Fry, 149. 
 
 Gallnghev v. Ciallaglier, g, 
 
 (iallinger v. I'arlinger, 233 
 
 Ciamble v. McKay, 93. 
 
 (iamble v. Kees, ()2, 127. 
 
 Ganiiner v. I'arker, 132. 
 
 darth v. Cotton. 83. 
 
 (lilchrist v. Ramsay, 9. 
 
 (rilkison v. Eiliott, 100. 
 
 C.illen v. ffavnes, 88. 
 
 Ciilliat V. (iilliat. 235. 
 
 (looderham v. De Grassi, 163. 
 
 Gooderhain v. Marlatt, 184. 
 
 (iordon v. Harper, 215. 
 
 Gordon, re, v. McFhail, 41. 
 
 Cioss V. Nugent, 67. 
 
 (iott V. (iandy, 115. 
 
 (iraham v. i-aw, loi. 
 
 (iranger v. Latham. 32. 
 
 Grantham v. Elliott, 122, IJ3. 
 
 Cirant v. Lynch, in. 
 
 (iray v. Hatch, 84. 
 
 Great Western Railway Company 
 
 V. Jones, 103. 
 Greenwood v. Greenwood, 221. 
 (ireet v. The Citizens Insurance 
 
 Company, 141. 
 Griffiths v. (irifhths, 241. 
 (irover v. (irover, 181. 
 Gwvnne v. Manistone, 1 19. 
 
 H 
 
 Haislcv, 
 
 re, 127, luy 
 Haldane v. Johns(jn 
 Hall v. Conder, 174, 
 Hall V. Hill, 42. 
 Hall V. Moriev 
 Hnllett \ 
 
 l67.'l^^, ifJo. 
 
 12; 
 
 1' 
 
 . '43- 
 
 Middleton, 07 
 
 Halliday v. Denison. 
 
 Ham V. Ham, 99. 
 
 Hanibley v. I'ull r, 2S1. 
 
 Hamilton v. Dennis, 24. 
 
 Hamilton v. Harrison, 190, 193, 196. 
 
 Handleyv. Stacey, 222. 
 
 Harman v. Reeve, 186. 
 
 Harnett v. Maitland, 117, 118. 
 
 Harrison v. lilackburn, 195. 
 
XVI. 
 
 TABLE OF CAofiS CITED. 
 
 Harrison v. Frost, 87. 
 Harris v. Commercial Bank, 207. 
 Harris v. Meyers," 167. 
 Hart V. Brown, 89. 
 Harvey v. Phillips, 104. 
 Haskill V. I-'iaser. 100. 
 Hastilow V. Stobie, 244. 
 Hawkins v. (ianiiner. 76. 
 Hawtrey v. Hutlin, 142. 
 Haynes'v. (^Jiilen, 8«. 
 Hayne v. M.iltby. 74. 
 Haynes v. Smith, 95. 
 Hayward v. Thacker, 22, 25. 
 Hebner v. Williamson, 8j. 
 He ward v. Jackson, 90. 
 He-, ard v, Scott, 100. 
 Hicks V. Snider, 238. 
 Hiern v. Mills, 45. 
 Hills V. Lanninfj, 73. 
 Hodgkinson v. Crowe, 129. 
 Hodson V. Treat, zoq. 
 Holford V. Hatch, 161. 
 Holland v. Moore, 29. 
 Holliday V. Holfrale, 184. 
 Holroyd v. Marshall, 197. 
 Holt V. Carmichael, J07. 
 HoltRate V. Kay, 117. 
 Holtzappfel v. Baker. 116, 121. 
 Honeywood v. Honeywood, 82. 
 Hood V. Barrington, 61. 
 Horsey v. Graham, 57. 
 Houghton V. Koenig, 21. 
 Howard, re, 24O. 
 Howell V. McKarlane, 207. 
 Hoyt V. W'iddifield, 95. 
 Hubert v. Treheriie, 61. 
 Hudson v." Kersey, 245. 
 Hughes V. Barker, 85. 
 Hughes V. Kowbotham, 131. 
 Hughes V. Towers, 117, 132. 
 Huguenin v. Basely, 13, 222. 
 Hull V. The City of London Brew- 
 ery Company, 109. 
 Humble v. fhinter, 74. 
 Hume V. Bentley, 107. 
 Hurburt v. Thomas, 69. 
 Hussey v. Hussey, 82. 
 Hutcheson v. Roberts, 207. 
 Hutton V. Fish, 21, 23. 
 Hyatt V. Ciriffith, 113. 
 
 I 
 
 Her V. Nolan, 88. 
 Ing V. Cromwell, 202, 
 Ingoldsby V. Ingoklsby, 220. 
 Inson ct al. v. Reynolds, S7. 
 Irving, in re. 170. 
 Ivens V. Elwes, 93. 
 Izod V. Lamb, 215. 
 
 J 
 
 Jackson v. Bowman, 75, 
 Jackson v. Campbell, 25. 
 Jackson v. Yeomans, 93, 143. 
 James v. Whitebread, 21. 
 jamieson v. Fi.sher, 100. 
 Jamieson v. McCollum, 88, 89. 
 Jeakes v. White, 58. 
 Jemott V. Cowley, 128. 
 Jenkins v. Jones, 148. 
 Jenner v. Jenner, 73, 
 Johnson, ex parte. 154. 
 Johnson v. Crofoot, 189. 
 Jones, re, 234. 
 Jones V. Jones, 234. 
 Jones V. Lock, 182. 
 Judge V. Thompson, 22, 
 Jury V. Bigott, 90. 
 
 K 
 
 Keech v. Hall, 208. 
 
 Keefer V. Merrill, 132. 
 
 Kcigwin v. Keigsvin, 244. 
 
 KeKewick v. Manning, 182. 
 
 Kelley v. Web.ster, 58. 
 
 Kelly V. Patterson, 129. 
 
 Kentlrew v. Shewan, 70, 98. 
 
 Kennedy v. Solomon, 95. 
 
 Kerr v. Coghill, 8y, 90. 
 
 Kerr v. Hastings Mutual Insurance 
 
 Company. 175. 
 Kerr v. Reade, 170. 
 Ketchum v. Mighton, 37 
 Keyes v. O'Brien, 127. 
 Keyse v. Haydon, 32. 
 Kindleside v. Harrison, 224. 
 Kirkwood v. Thompson, 148. 
 Kitchen v. Murray, 32. 
 Knight V, Barber, 59. 
 Knight V. Crockford, 61. 
 
 Lady Chester's Case, 235. 
 
 Laing v. The Ontario Loan and 
 
 Savings Company, 19, 47, 141, 
 
 142, igf>. 
 Lai V. Stall, 70. 
 Lambe v. Orton, 170. 
 Lamert v. Heath, 52. 
 Lampon v. Corke, 76. 
 Lancey v. Johnson, 124, 117. 
 Langford v. Mahony, 104. 
 Langstaft'v. Meague, 142. 
 Lansdowne v. Lansdowne, 51. 
 Larges' Case, 233. 
 Lario v. Walker, 91, 
 
TABLE OF CASES CITED. 
 
 XVU. 
 
 Latch V. BriRht, 20. 
 Latch V. Furlong. 148, 149. 
 Lavin v, Lavin, 75. 
 Lawes v. Purser, 174. 
 Lawlor v. Lawlor, 85, 155. 
 Lawlor v. Murchison, 74. 
 Lawlor V. Sutherland, 161. 
 Lawrence v. Errington, 70. 
 Lawton v. Lawton, 83. 
 l^wton V. Salmon, 83. 
 Lay V. Mottram, 93. 
 Lee V. Alston, 82. 
 Lee V. Gaskell, 58. 
 Lee V. Lancashire Railway Co., 76. 
 Lee V. Lorch, 127. 
 I^eds V. Cheethain, 121. 
 Lepg V. Henion, 129. 
 Lehman v. McArthur, 125. 
 Leland v. The Medora. 213. 
 Leonard v. Merritt, 28. 
 Lewis lk>wles' Case, 83, 
 Leys V. Fisken, 126. 
 Liddeil v, Munro, C)3. 
 Lincolns' College C^ase, 174. 
 Lindsay Petroleum Company v. Par- 
 dee, 5. 
 Linet, re, 38. 
 Little V. Aikman, 23. 
 Livermore v. Hagley, 177. 
 Llewellyn v. Jersey, 88. 
 Lloyd V. Henderson, 37. 
 Loeschman v. Machin, 209. 
 Logic V. Young, 42. 
 Loughead v. Stubbs, 99. 
 Lovelace v. Harrington, 96, 147. 
 Lundy v. Dovey, 112. 
 Lyle V. Richards, 88. 
 Lynch v. O Hara, 100. 
 
 M 
 
 Macaulay v. Allen, 208. 
 
 Macdonald v. Macdonald, 51. 
 
 Mackay, re, 233 
 
 Mackreth v. bymons, 102. 
 
 Macleay, re, 233. 
 
 Magee v. Rankin, 126. 
 
 Mahoney v. Burdett, 240. 
 
 Makaness v. Long, 183. 
 
 Makin v. Wilkinson, 115. 
 
 Mansfield, re, 244. 
 
 Marquess of Winchester Case, 219. 
 
 Marshall v. (ireen, 59. 
 
 Martin v. Bearman, 165. 167. 
 
 Martin v. Crow, 86, 87. 
 
 Martin v. Banning, 28. 
 
 Martin v. Martin. 220. 221. 
 
 Martin v. Smith, iii. 
 
 Martin v. Woods, 143. 
 
 Martindale v. Clarkson, T52. 
 
 Mason v, McDonald. 207. 
 
 Ma.son v. Seney. 51, 75. 
 
 Maughan v. Hubbard, 27. 
 
 May V. The Security Loan and Sav- 
 ings Society, 196. 
 
 McAdam v. Walter, 219. 
 
 McDonald v. McDonald, 28, 102, 
 149. 
 
 McDonald v. McDonell, 8, 
 
 McDougall V. Young, 161. 
 
 McKachern v. Somerville, 87. 
 
 Mcdregor V. McMichael, 87. 
 
 Mcintosh V. James, 126. 
 
 Mcintosh V. Wood, 99. 152. 
 
 McKay v. McKay, 19. 140. 
 
 McKay v. Reed, 93. 
 
 McLean v. Tmsley, 53. 
 
 McLellan v. Meggat, 100. 
 
 McLennan v. McLean, 155. 
 
 McLeod V. Truax, 248. 
 
 McMartin v. McDougall, 202. 
 
 Mcpherson v. Dougan, ih^. 
 
 Mc(,Jueen v. F'arquhar, 149 
 
 McSherry, re. 10, 12 
 
 Men-ie? v. White, 221. 
 
 Mercer v. Hewston, 281. 
 
 Mercer v. 'J'he Atl(jrnney-General 
 of Ontario, 5, 254. 
 
 Mews V. Carr, 61. 
 
 Michie re, v. The Corporation of 
 Toronto, 123. 
 
 Miles V. I'urber, 132. 
 
 Mills V. Banks, 149. 
 
 Mills V. King, 207 
 
 Minshell v. Oakes, 158. 
 
 Mitchell V. Coffee, 132. 
 
 Mitchell V. McDuff^y, 132. 
 
 Mitchell V. McGatfey, 102. 
 
 Montgomery v. Spence, 159. 
 
 Montgomery v. Wright, 207. 
 
 Moore v. Boulton, 95 
 
 Moore v. l<oyd, 23. 
 
 Moore v. Hynes, 95. 
 
 Moore v. Kay, 114, 115, 117. 
 
 Moore v. Sibbald, 1S4. 
 
 Moore v. Skinner, 151. 
 
 Moran v. Currie, 166. 
 
 Moray v. Totten. 51. 
 
 Morgan v. Quesnel, 42. 
 
 Morris v. Harris, 83, 
 
 Morton, re, 235, 250. 
 
 Moule V. (iariett, 107. 
 
 Muir V. Waddell, 170. 
 
 Munro v. Smart, 217, 225, 231. 
 
 Murray v. Van Brocklin, 28. 
 
 Muzzy V. Knight, 202. 
 
 Myerstein v. Barber, 188. 
 
 Mykel v. Doyle, 90. 
 
 
XVlll. 
 
 TAMIiK OF CASES CITKD. 
 
 N 
 
 Nafjlc V. Kilts, ^4. 
 
 Napper v. Allinnton, 97. 
 
 Nash V. ralmer, <)5. 
 
 Neale v. W inler, 74. 
 
 Neff V. Thompson. loi. 
 
 Newman v. Anderton, 214. 
 
 Newns, re, 237. 
 
 Newton v. Clarke, 24s. 24'). 
 
 Nicholson v. Huikholder. 23O. 
 
 Noke's ('ase, 1 15. 
 
 Nolan \. l"o.\.8.S. 
 
 North «)f Scotland Company v. 
 
 (ierman, i4f). 
 Nunn V. I'abian, iii. 
 
 
 
 <) Connor v. Heattv, 25. 
 ODonndl v. HiiRiU, (>g. 
 f)'Donn»^ll V. 'I'iernan, «7. 
 Oldcrshaw V. Holt, 120. 
 Olding, rt. 246. 
 Oliver V. Newhoiise, 215. 
 (^> Neill V. Small. 20 ^ 
 O'Sullivan v. Clnxton, 6j, C7, O9. 
 Otway V. Sadli(M . 246. 
 Owens V. 'riiumas, 21. 
 Owston V. Williams, go. 
 
 Paice v.Tlie Archbishop of Canter- 
 bury, 231. 
 Parke B., ^cr, 195. 
 Parker V. raswell, iii. 
 Parkhurst v. Roy, 40, 217. 
 Parkinson v. Hanbiny, 148. 
 Parks V. Hall, 203. 
 I'arr v. Love;,<rove, 103. 
 Parr v. Montgomery, 153. 
 I'arsons, re, 179. 
 I'artiiigtons Case, 233. 
 Patoii V. Dickscm, 251. 
 Patterson v. Thompson, 132. 
 Peck V. ('arey, 224. 
 Pennyman v. McGronan, ,^33. 
 Perrott v. Perrott, 82. 
 Perry v. Roberts, 234. 
 F'ew V. Laftcrty, 234. 
 I'eyton's Settlement, ;'(•, 149. 
 Phillimore v. fSeny, 61. 
 Phillips V. Ciutteridge, 166. 
 Phipps V. Sculthorpe, 130. 
 I'idgeley v. Rawling, 82. 
 Piper V. Simpson, 22, 122. 
 Plumb V. McGannon, 8g 
 Poulett V. Hood, 7. 
 Powley V. Walker, 117. 
 Pronguey v. Gurney, 132. 
 
 Propert v. Parker, no. 
 I'roudfooi V. .\nstin, 42. 
 
 Q 
 
 yueen v. Carter, 161. 
 
 Rae V. (ieddes, 103. 
 Reed v. Ranks, },i. 
 R. V. I-errybridge, 82. 
 ReRina v. IJrewster, 90. 
 Regina v, (J'Meara, 27. 
 Reid V. Whitehead, 153. 
 Rhodes v. iJuckland. 14S. 
 Richardson v, Armitage. 75. 
 Richanlson v. (iitford, 112. 
 Richardson v. I.angridge, 112. 
 Richardson v. Ranney, 132. 
 Richardson v. Richardson, 182. 
 Richmond v. ICvans, 148. 
 Ridded v, Ri.ldell, 94. 
 Right V. D.irby, 129. 
 Right d. I.euis v. Heard, 129. 
 Ringer v, Cann. los. 
 Kobertson, re, v. Robertson, 41. 
 Robins v. cMark, 191, 19S. 
 Robson V. I'light, 14S. 
 Roe V, Sides, 126. 
 Rogers v. I.owihian, 275. 
 Rooke V. Kensington, 73. 
 Ross V. lies, 234. 
 Rowe V. Street, 127. 
 Rupert V. Jolinston, 181. 
 
 S 
 
 Saloway v. Strawbridge, 147. 
 
 Sanderson v. Jackson, fii. 
 
 Schofield V. Dickinson, 42. 
 
 Schultz V. Reddick, 131. 
 
 Scott V. Kastern (bounties Railway 
 Company, 1S6. 
 
 Scott V. Porcher, 170. 
 
 Scriver v. Myers, 127. 
 
 Seaton v. I.unney, 78, 79, 91. 
 
 Sefton V. Hopwood, 222. 
 
 Shank v. Cates, 84. 
 
 Sharman, re, 242. 
 
 Sharr v. Pilch, 46. 
 
 Shaw V. Pird, 233. 
 
 Shaver, re, 9. 
 
 Sheedy v. Roach, 182. 
 
 Shelley's Case, 91. 
 
 Sherman v. Parsill, 102. 
 
 Shirley v. Newman, 129. 
 
 Shower v. Pilch, 181. 
 
 Skinner v, Ainsworth, 70, gg. 
 
 Slater v. Fisken, 41. 
 
 South Australian Insurance Com- 
 pany, V. Randell, 184. 
 
TAIJI.K OF CASKS CITKD. 
 
 XIX. 
 
 Smnrt v. H.inliiiK, 5S. 
 
 Sniitli V. Ivnistoad, z\ii. 
 
 Smith V. Kri'un. .'t _•. 
 
 Sniitli V. ( "Icinris ft nl. >i~. 
 
 Smit!' V. I'auKlit, z\:. 
 
 i^in'nh V. [larris, z\.\. 
 
 Smith V. Knipht, 2 56. 
 
 Smith V. Manable. 115. 
 
 Smith V. Smith, J45. 
 
 Sjienucr's Case. iji. 15S, 
 
 Sfiiiit of The '. ).c,in, ^i::. 
 
 Stammers "■. (;l)i>uuhi)i', ()(>. 
 
 Stamme's v. !'ri.'st«m, 5<j. 
 
 Stanton V. Wiiideal, 8i), 
 
 Stephi'iisun, n. 2j^,^. 
 
 Stevfiis V. HiK'k, SO. 
 
 Stevens. in v. Hain, 64, 
 
 Stewart V. 1 [unter, 70. 
 
 Stinsi'ii V. Mij,'ill. i=)Ci. 
 
 Stoddart V. Stoddart, 15.}. 
 
 Stracey, rr. d^j. 
 
 Stranksv. St. J')hi\ 107. lo'j.i 14,1 15. 
 
 Stroni^hill \. lUick, 74, 
 
 St>h;s V. Waiilli;, 1 1<). 
 
 Summers v. ("ook, 187. 
 
 Superior Savintjs and Loan Com- 
 
 jiany, v. Lucas, 141, 155. 
 Snrpliie v. ["aniswDrth, iji. 
 Swire v. Leach, i\i. 
 Swit/er V. McMillan, 10. 
 
 Taylor v. r>ealp, 122 
 
 Taylor \'. Meade, ^4 ^. 
 
 Thii;eaiidean v. Skead, S7. 
 
 Thukell, If I'errin v. Wood, 20S. 
 
 Thomas, re, 239, j.^o. 
 
 Tho'.nas v. Cook, 131. 
 
 Thompson v. Urowne, .'.\~. 
 
 T'.iompson v. 'IMiompson, gS. 
 
 Thompstm v. Torrance, 221, 223. 
 
 Tiftanv v. Clarke, itj6. 
 
 'I'immins v. l^owlin.son, 113, 129. 
 
 Torld V. Cain, 24. 
 
 Tchey, rf, 246. 
 
 Tomlinson v. Hill. 09. 
 
 Toppin V. Lomas, 57. 
 
 'J'oronto Street Railway Company 
 V. Fleming?, i7(>. 
 
 Totten V. Douglas, 1^3. 
 
 Townsend v, Wilson, 147. 
 
 Trust and Loan Company v. Gal- 
 lagher, 154. 
 
 Trust and Loan Company v. Lawra- 
 son. 19, 47, 142, 153'. 
 
 Turley v. Benedict, iiS. 
 
 Van Norman v. Heaupre, 98. 
 Vaughan v. Hancock, 58. 
 
 Viet V. Viet. 181. 
 Viiiev V ( haplii), jf>. 
 Vinniviomlie v. iJutlcr, 245. 
 
 W 
 
 W.iddoll V McColl, 144. 
 
 Wafer V. Tavlor, 152. 
 
 W.tldion V. Jacob, t>i. 
 
 Walker V. llatton, ibi. 
 
 Walker v Jones, i()5. 
 
 Walker V. I'ower.s, iji), 
 
 Wallhiidj^e v. Everett, 93. 
 
 Walton \. Mill, 100, loi. 
 
 Wapels V. Mall, 42. 
 
 Ward V Heck, 214. 
 
 Wardell v. Trenonth, 70. 
 
 Ware v. Cann, 233. 
 
 WarinR v. Hogarth, if)2. 
 
 Wallow V. Harrison, 01. 
 
 Waterhouse \-. Lee, 222. 
 
 Wats n V. Limlsay, 34. 
 
 Watson V. Wellington, 170. 
 
 W.iti V I'e.idi.r, i()6. 
 
 W;itts \ . Symes, iftb. 
 
 Weiss V. Crafts, 104. 
 
 Wellington v. Lhard, 170. 
 
 West V. Kay, 243. 
 
 Wheelden v. ^Llligan, 13c. 
 
 Whicker V. Hume, 3H, 241. 
 
 White V. ISrown, 208. 
 
 White V. Laing, 99, 100, 10 1. 
 
 W hittier v. McLennan, 23, 24, 25. 
 
 \\vi\e V. Stewart, 88. 
 
 \\ ilos V. Woodward, 74. 
 
 Wilkinson v. \Vilkinson, 170 234. 
 
 Williams v. (irey, 131. 
 
 Willi;ims v. Morris, 183. 
 
 Wils.in V. Jiiggar, 95, 97. 
 
 Wilson V. Meir, 208. 
 
 Wilson V. Nightingale, 131. 
 
 Wilson V. Wilson, 220. 
 
 Wilttm V, l:)unn, 108. 
 
 Winter V. Lord Anson. 73, 76. 
 
 Wishart v. Cook, 38. 
 
 Wittrock V. Halliman, lOo. 
 
 Woorl V. McAlpine, 170. 
 
 Wdod V. Tate, 1 13. 
 
 Woolam V. Hearn, Oo. 
 
 Worsley v. Tinch, 101. 
 
 Wotton, re, 244. 
 
 Wright %'. Stavert, 5S. 
 
 Wright V. The London Life Assur- 
 ance Company, 24. 
 
 Wright V. The Sun Mutual Life 
 Insurance Company. 24. 
 
 Young V. Roberts, 165. 
 Young V. Young, 10. 
 
PLAN OF WORK. 
 
 1. Introductory Chapter. 
 
 2. Title — Realty and Personalty. 
 
 3. ARreemeiits— Conditions of Sale. 
 
 4. Sales of Land. 
 
 5. Leases. 
 
 (). Mortgages. 
 
 7. Assignments. 
 
 8. Personal Property. 
 •J. Wills. 
 
 10. Precedents, Forms and References nnder the above chapters in order. 
 
 11. Comparisons of the Statutes relating to Forms of Conveyances and 
 Mortgages. 
 
 12. Statute relating to Short Form of Leases. 
 
 13. Statute relating to Chattel Mortgages, etc., as amended to 18S2. 
 
 14. Index to Treatise. 
 
 15. Index to Precedents, etc. 
 
 Ill 
 
PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING 
 
 INTRODUCTORY. 
 
 I. Prei.iminakv. 
 
 II. Pakties: 
 
 1. The Croii'it. 
 
 2. Cvrpurations. 
 
 3. Trustees. 
 
 4. Husband and •wife. 
 
 5. I)ij\ints. 
 
 6. Lunatics. 
 
 7. Other disabilities. 
 
 III. Subject Matter of the Con- 
 
 tract AND Law governing 
 
 IT. 
 
 IV. Short Forms of Conveyanc- 
 
 ing. 
 
 V. Recitals. 
 VI. r>ATE. 
 
 VII. DlTLICATES. 
 
 VIII. E.XEciTiON : 
 
 1. Signature. 
 
 2. Seaiinf;. 
 
 3. Delivery. 
 
 IX. WiTNES.SING AND 
 
 Execution. 
 
 X. 
 
 Alteration, 
 
 ETC. 
 
 Proof of 
 Cancellation, 
 
 XI. Registration. 
 
 I. PRELIMIXAEY. 
 
 The object of this treatise is to atfonl to the student or 
 young practitioner such instruction and information as will 
 enable him to prepare ^vith accuracy the several kinds of 
 instruments that are ordinarily included in the term con- 
 veyancing.' These will include agreements, sales, mort- 
 gages, leases and assignments, and will be preceded by an 
 enquiry into the title to property — both real and personal, 
 and concluding with a chapter on \Vills — the only one sub- 
 
 ■ Conveyance includes a feoffment, grant, lease, surrender, or other 
 assurance of land; R. S. O. cap. 98. sec. i. A will is not an assurance 
 under the Act respecting Descent. The word conveyance is not properly- 
 applicable to personal property. The correct term is alienation. See 
 chapter on Bills of i;ale, post. 
 
 o.s.c. - 1 
 
S PHACTICAL CONVKYANCINO. 
 
 jc'c't upon which, so far us the convoyunct'i' is coiiciriu'd, 
 the hiw rif^anling realty and personalty may be said to he 
 identical. On eacli of the subjects hereafter referred to, 
 there will necessarily be found many points common to all, 
 and with the exception of Wills there is indeed a sort of 
 family likeness in almost every assurance of land. The 
 foundation of conveyances lies in contract, and a contract 
 implies contracting^ parties — capacity to enter into the con- 
 tract — some subject matter of the contract and the consensus 
 of the parties to the same tiling. These, and some other 
 matters to be noticed presently, must not be lost sif^ht of 
 no matter what the conveyance may be, and it is necessary 
 to be thorouf,'hly informed on these points in order to take 
 instructions intelligently, or advise on any sort of instru- 
 ment disposinj^ of lands or chattels. 
 
 Conveyances, with perhaps only one excoi^tion in real 
 property, require to be in writing, and the writing must be 
 under seal — that is a Deed. A Deed has uniform solemni- 
 ties — it has or ought to have a date, should be signed and 
 scaled, and should be delivered. Almost any instrument 
 affecting real estate may be registered, and any instrument 
 may be cancelled after execution. 
 
 It will thus be seen that there are a number of points 
 common to several instruments in conveyancing and a few 
 common to them all. It is proposed in the present chapter 
 to comment upon these, and the student will bear this care- 
 fully in mind, and before wishing to study any sul)sequent 
 chapter (except Wills) he must become familiar with such 
 elementary things as are here set out, and which are gen- 
 erally of essential importance to the effectual operation of 
 the instruments he may be considering. It will be of little 
 benefit if great ingenuity be displaj'ed in elaborating a 
 special conveyance, when it may be discovered that the 
 parties were incapable, or the execution defective, or the 
 registration omitted, or that any of the many points to be 
 attended to have been overlooked. So many of these details 
 are entrusted to students that it is especially necessary 
 they should be familiar with them. 
 
INTRoni'CTOnY — PAllTIKH. 
 
 8 
 
 II. PARTIES. 
 
 St'vcriil imiKntiiut (lucstious iirisf as to parties : 
 iHt, What poisons are proper and neeesHary parties ? and 
 •2nd, Are tliese possessed of Hutticient contracting ca- 
 jjiicity to convey or hold the i)roperty under consideration ? 
 So far as tlie proper parties are concerned, it is perhaps 
 u truism to say that every person, wlio has an interest in 
 lands or chattels, must join in a conveyance disposing; of 
 tliem hefore they indisputahly l)ecome the property of an- 
 other. 
 
 The investigati(m of the title discloses who are the 
 owners — who have an interest in the property — whether it 
 still remains in the Crown, whether held by a corporation, 
 hy joint owners, held in trust, held hy a married woman, 
 or held hy an infant, idiot or lunatic, a traitor or a felon, etc. 
 
 If the property is held in trust, then the le<^al and e(pntable 
 owners must ordinarily l>e parties, and the latter must l)o 
 ol" the full a};e of twenty-one years, and not otherwise inca- 
 {•iicitated. But the fact that property is sold hy an agent, 
 or under power of attorni'y, is no reason why these, the agent 
 or attorney, should be made parties.' The principals in 
 l)oth cases are the pro[)er and necessary parties. Corpora- 
 tions are known by the corporate name, but partners in 
 business must convey individually ; their firm name is not 
 known to the law of real property. Infants, idiots and 
 lunatics, where they are permitted to di'al in the disposi- 
 tion of their property, are necessary pnrties ; but where the 
 High Court of Justice gives a vesting order to a purchaser, 
 tlie parties are dispensed with in it, though they must all 
 be before the Court.** 
 
 Persons invested with a poMcr of sale or mortgage, such 
 as trustees, executors or mortgagees under a power of sale, 
 are necessary, and generally, though not necessarily, suf- 
 ficient parties. Where any estate of inheritance is being 
 
 
 ' See under Execution in this chapter. 
 ^ See under Vesting Order, chap. II. 
 
4 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCiyO. 
 
 sold or mortgaged the husband or wife of the vendor may 
 be necessary parties, in order to dispose of any interest in 
 the property they may have therein. 
 
 The parties to whom a disposition of property is made 
 are not so difficult to determine, but every person to whom 
 any interest in property is to be granted should be made a 
 party to the instrument. 
 
 A husband or wife of a purchaser is not made a party in 
 order to secure them in their legal interest — that in our law 
 may be said to accrue in virtue of marriage. The remarks 
 that have been made in reference to corporations, partner- 
 ships, infants, and idiots, apply so far as these may be 
 parties recipients. 
 
 It is of no importance where the parties live, as the objec- 
 tion on the ground of alienage cannot now prevail,' an 
 alien having the same capacity, apparently, to hold and con- 
 vey real estate in this Province, as a natural born or 
 natui'alized subject of Her Majesty.- 
 
 The capacity to contract is restricted in some persons 
 and entirely absent in others. A wife's interest in her own 
 lands cannot apparently be disposed of without certain 
 formalities, and an infant — that is any person under twenty- 
 one years of age — cannot dispose of it so effectually as not 
 to be able to repudiate his act after majority. An 
 idiot or lunatic is generally incapacitated from dealing with 
 his property. A trustee cannot divest himself of the 
 obligations of his trust estate without the consent of his 
 cestui que trnstent. A corporation must be guided by its 
 charter, and take care not to go beyond its enabling provi- 
 sions ; and until recently an alien could neither buy nor 
 sell real estate in this Province. These and some other 
 disabilities will be referred to presently. It may not be 
 out of place to make a few remarks on what is the source 
 of ownership in property. 
 
 ' Dckari v. Dchart. 26 C. P. 4S9. 
 " R. S. O. cap. 97. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — PARTIES. 6 
 
 1, Crown. The Crown is the absohite owner of such 
 lands within the Province, as it has not disposed of ah-eady, 
 and tliere is moreover a doctrine in law that on the failure of 
 heirs of a grantee from the crown, the land reverts back to 
 it l)y escheat. But where lands are granted to a corpora- 
 tion by a third party, and the corporation becomes dis- 
 solved, it seems that there is no escheat.^ There is no 
 higher owner than the crown — there is a superior owner 
 to every grantee not a creature of the crown — the subject 
 has the absolute use of land — the crown has the absolute 
 ownership — the Dominium.- 
 
 The crown where it conveys directl,y, does so by open 
 letters of grant literce patentes, and so the name of the 
 crown grants came to be called Patents. The usual words 
 corresponding to the extent of the grant are the same as in 
 other deeds, Ijut the crown in selling land never enters into 
 convenants for title.'' 
 
 Crown grants are construed in favor of the grantee ; for 
 the honor of the crown the largest possible meaning is to 
 be given to its grants. 
 
 The Lieutenant-Governor of this Province is assumed to 
 represent the crown for the purpose of disposing of the 
 public lands.* 
 
 ■ In Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Pardee, 22 Chy. rS, it was held that a cor- 
 poration constituted under C. S. C. cap. 63 and 29 Vic. cap. 21, allowing 
 the period named on the declaration of the shareholders of the company 
 to pass before disposing of lands purchased by them, ceased to have any 
 interest in the lands, and that the lands had reverted to the grantors. 
 
 = In the celebrated case of Mercer v. The Attorney-General of Ontario, 
 it was conceded by counsel in the argument in the Supreme Court of 
 Canada, that on failure of heirs the crown took by escheat, the question 
 reduced itself to this. Does the Provincial Attorney-General or the 
 Dominion Attorney-General represent the crown ? 
 
 3 Deane on Conveyancing, page 341. 
 
 •• In this Province, in the Department of Crown Lands, both be- 
 fore and since Confederation, the different Executive Governments in 
 power have assumed that the Queen is the H.\ecutive of the Local Legis- 
 lature and that the Lieutenant-Governor is representative of Her Majesty. 
 Crown Patents are therefore issued from this department just as they 
 would be in Ottawa, or in London, England, at the proper land offices of 
 the Governments there. This assumption of Royal power has not passed 
 unchallenged by the Courts, but if the full extent of the doctrine that the 
 Queen has no place in the Local Legislatures be pushed to its legitimate 
 conclusions, it would be found that grants so made are technically incorrect. 
 The powers granted to municipal and other corporations are at all e\"ents 
 exercised differently from those granted to the Provincial bodies. 
 
 I; 
 
6 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 The patents as they are called are under the great seal 
 and must he a matter of record,' and the grantees must l>o 
 capahle of taking.^ Whether the grant he for a valid con- 
 sideration or of special favor, it is to he construed in the 
 same manner as deeds from suhject to suhject.^ 
 
 2. Corporations. As reg.irds grants hy and to corporate 
 bodies, the statute creating them must be carefully looked 
 into, and unless they have the express povver to hold and 
 acquire property they cannot be grantees; nor can they con- 
 vey unless they have equally express power of disposing. 
 All the formalities laid down by the Act must be scrupu- 
 lously followed as to parties, execution, witnesses, etc. If 
 a bare power to sell is given, an objection may be taken that 
 this is not sufficient to warrant a mortgage, though a power 
 to sell has been held to include that of leasing. Where 
 there was no express word in a statute (though stated in the 
 preamble) empowering a corporation to receive by devise, 
 it was argued strongly that the power to take by grant did 
 not include that of a gift by will under the statute/ The 
 power of acquiring real estate and disposing of it are, how- 
 ever, the most ordinarj' powers conferred on a corporation. 
 Municipal Corporations,Loan, and other companies, and the 
 various lay and ecclesiastical corporations, have all more or 
 less these powers. In regard to charitable bequests to cor- 
 porations, it has been held that the statutes of Mortmain, 9 
 Geo. II. cai>. 36, relating to charitable uses, are in force in 
 this Province,'" and that they apply to municipal cor- 
 porations." 
 
 A corporation aggregate capable of taking and conveying 
 lands can convey by deed of bargain and sale, and they are 
 within the terms of the Short Forms Act as parties. No 
 covenants can ordinarily be exacted from a municipal cor- 
 
 ' Doc (I. Jackson v. Wilkes, 4 O. S. 142. 
 
 " Doe d. Sheldon v. Ramsuy, g Q. B. 105. 
 
 3 Clark V. Bonnycastlc, 3 O. S. 50S. 
 
 * Unreported case in the Common Pleas. 
 
 5 The Corporatiun of Whitby v. Liscombc, 23 Chy. 1. 
 
 '' Brown v. McNab, 20 Chy. 179. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — PARTIES. 
 
 poiation unless the usual one from a trustee," and it would 
 seem that any limited owner who sells under a statutory 
 power need not enter into covenants bej'ond his own interest.* 
 
 The general rule is that, unless for trivial matters, all 
 contracts and agreements made with corporations must, 
 to bind them, be under their corporate seal. But where 
 work done for a corporation is such as was evidently 
 contemplated by their charter, and they have accepted and 
 availed themselves of it, they cannot refuse to pay on the 
 ground that there was no contract under seal.* (See cases 
 under Execution). 
 
 3. Trustees. A trustee is a person who has the legal 
 estate, though some other person may have the beneficial 
 interest in the property in question. If land is granted 
 unto and to the use of A. to hold to the use of B., A. is the 
 legal owner, as trustee; B. is the equitable owner, as the 
 rentui que tnist. Also where B. mortgages his farm to A. 
 in the usual form ; A. is trustee for B. after the payment of 
 the mortgage money. 
 
 Where property is held in trust by one man for another's 
 benefit the former as trustee c .nnot, unless the trust instru- 
 ment gives such power, convey the entire legal and equit- 
 able estate ; he can, it is true, convey the legal estate, but 
 this may not relieve him of his obligations under tlie 
 trust unless the cestui que trust is a consenting party thereto. 
 Deeds of this kind should set out the owners of the legal 
 and equitable estates as the parties thereto, the consent of 
 the cestui que trustent, where that is necessary, the fact that 
 they are of age if the equitable estate was created during 
 the minority of the latter. 
 
 The instrument by which the trust was created must be 
 first of all examined and the powers given to the trustees 
 closely followed. 
 
 The usual covenant where a trustee conveys, is ihat he 
 himself has done no act to encumber the property, and it 
 
 
 ' Poiilett V. Hood, L. R. 5 Eq. 115. 
 
 = Clark V. The Hamilton & Gore Mechanics Institute, 12 Q. B. 178. 
 
^HHHIVP^MiP 
 
 8 
 
 PRACTICAL COm^EYANCraO. 
 
 would seem that any limited owner who sells under a 
 statutory power need not enter into convenants for title 
 extending beyond his own interest.' Mr. Dart also lays 
 down the rule that owners of land, whose estates are 
 altogether taken eompuisorily, as for instance by a railway 
 company need not enter into any covenants at all. The 
 equitable owner of an estate or the person beneficially 
 interested in the purchase money covenants for the acts 
 of those in whom the legal estate is vested.- 
 
 Where executors convey land under a power of sale in 
 the will of their testator, they should not covenant for them- 
 selves, their heirs, etc., in their deed to the purchaser that 
 the testator had a good title as they will be personally 
 liable on that covenant, as it has been held that the grant 
 by them qua executors, could not control their express con- 
 tract.* 
 
 4. Husband and "Wife. A husband is under no disa- 
 bility to convey or mortgage his own interest in any estate 
 of which he is owner. But as regards estates of inheritance 
 he cannot convey or mortgage his wife's interest (if any) or 
 give what his purchaser or mortgagee has the right to ex- 
 pect unless she is made a party and bars her dower there- 
 in, or unless she is disentitled. This will be referred to at 
 length in the chapters on sales and mortgages. 
 
 The wife on the other hand cannot dispose of her own 
 interest where she is the legal owner without her husband 
 being made a party to the instrument. She is therefore yet 
 under some disability, although a Judge of the High Court 
 of Justice, or of the County Court, can come to her assist- 
 ance where the consent of her husband cannot be obtained.* 
 
 ' Dart. v. & P. 503. 
 " Greenwood Concise Conveyancer, 12. 
 3 McDonald v. 'McDonnell, 6 O. S. 109. 
 
 Note. — It »i? recommended to separate the legal from the equitable 
 owners in a conveyance. 
 
 * A wife can apparently execute a deed alone if her husband is in 
 prison ; Crocker v. Sow den, 33 Q. B. 397. See R. S. O. cap. 127. 
 
INTRODUCTORY PARTIES. 
 
 9 
 
 But so far as her equitable estate is concerned, the husband 
 is not a necessary party to a conveyance thereof/ 
 
 5. Infants. An infant, unless with the sanction of the 
 High Court of Justice, cannot convey his interest in land so 
 as to be binding on him after he attains the age of twenty-one 
 years. Care should therefore be taken that the conveying 
 party is over that age, and in cases suggestive of 
 dou1)t a statutory declaration ought to be taken (see forms). 
 A person choosing to run the risk of a minor not repudiat- 
 ing his contract after majority, must of course assume that 
 responsibility — but he should be told that the effect of such 
 a transfer is virtually to have the sale lie in abeyance, to 
 see if the infant after his majority will refuse to be bound 
 by it.- The infant is not bound, immediately after he be- 
 comes of age to act, but his acquiesence in the sale will be 
 deemed conjirmatorn, unless he asserts the contraiy.' The 
 sale is not absolutely void — it is voidable only, and unless 
 repudiated or voided by some act, it is confirmed by lapse 
 of time — by the silence of the grantor, when he was aware 
 of all the facts. He may repudiate it during non-age* ; and, 
 in order to ratify a contract made by him during infancy, 
 the ratification must be in writing and signed by the party. 
 
 A sale to an infant is in somewhat the same unsettled 
 condition as a sale bv him. If the grantor knows that he 
 is selling to an infant, he is l)ound, though the infant may 
 not be, and is not, till after his majority is reached. If an 
 infant fraudulently represents that he is of age and obtains 
 the benefit of a contract, the court will not afterwards hear 
 him in repudiation of it." Generally speaking, where an 
 infant has received the full benefit of a sale to, or by him. 
 
 
 in 
 
 See Boustend v. Wliitiitore, 
 
 M ft?0« 
 
 ' Adams v. Looniis, 22 Chy. 99; 22 Chy. 22S. 
 22 Chy. 222. 
 
 = Re Shaver. 3 Chy. Cha. 379 ; Rennet t<t.,Xidfe/GMQI^^ 
 
 Galhighcy V. GuUagher, 30 U. C. K. 415. DlDUIW " t 
 
 5 Fcathcrstonc v. McDuneU. 15 U. C. C. F. 162. V).d*0. 
 
 •» Gilchrist v. Ramsay, 27 U. C. R. 400. 
 
 5 Binncttov. Holden, 21 Grant, 222; Gallagher v. GallaghMy^ U. C. R. 
 415; ye Shaver, 3 Chy. Cha. 379. See as to action on such iXj^rtoact 
 against the infant, Bartlett v. Wells. 31 L. J. Q. B. 57, atiAWc iUol\a^f ;-, 
 12 C. B. N. S. 272. *^ 
 
■HSVi 
 
 10 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 he will not be allowed to disturb it, even if the parties can 
 be put in the same position, unless there was undervalue. 
 The first enquiry would be — in case a sale were the most 
 beneficial — was the full value received. An infant cannot 
 be compelled to complete a coua'act for the purchase of an 
 estate, but he cannot recover his deposit money on the 
 ground of his infancy, if he decline to complete the purchase ; 
 and an infant cannot enforce specific performance of a con- 
 tract against an adult contracting party.' 
 
 There are several statutory regulations as to the sale of 
 infants' estates. The usual course, though not the sole one 
 adopted, is the sale by means of the High Court of Justice. 
 The interests of infant owners of shares, or of whole estates, 
 are bound by sale made under the direction of the court ; 
 but the court does not sell unless it is for the infant's bene- 
 fit to do so, nor can it sell contrary to the directions of anj' 
 will affecting the property in the hands of infants. Such 
 a sale cannot be repudiated by the infant on his attaining 
 his majority. 
 
 The guardian of infants cannot give a lease of their estate. 
 Such lease is void, ab initio, unless sanctioned by- the High 
 Court of Justice.' 
 
 6. Lunatics. Under the term " lunatic, " or person 
 of " unsound mind," the Divisional Courts of the High 
 Court of Justice include every form of incapacity to contract, 
 or to deal with, or devise property, arising from mental 
 derangement, whether such incapacit^^ be slight imbecility 
 or any of the various forms of insanity up to idiocy. The 
 student will recognize two classes of people incapable of 
 'vlinr; for themselves — classes that are medical rather than 
 b''t;''i divisions. 
 
 i ^> The insane who have or had no lucid intervals. 
 2nd. Idiots who were born incapables.' 
 
 ■ See cases in Addision on Contracts, page 1027. 
 
 = Switzer v. McMillan, 23 Chy. 538. 
 
 ' Young V. Young, 10 Grant 265 ; re McSherry, 10 Grant 390. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — PARTIPJS. 
 
 11 
 
 Of insane persons, using that term as including all who 
 are not constitutionally defective from their birth, a great 
 many divisions are made, such as monomaniacs^ maniacs, 
 (h'lncnted, Sec. In all of these, though slightly in the latter 
 class, there are lucid intervals. Within these periods the 
 parties can contract and are bound by their contracts. A 
 monomaniac, if his mental disorder does not affect his 
 knowledge of what he is doing, is able to contract. The 
 same applies, though more difficult perhaps to prove, in 
 regard to persons afflicted w'ith acute or chronic mania. 
 Subsequent insanity has no effect of course on a contract 
 — a man may contract one day and become insane the next, 
 without affecting the contract. Once, however, that a man 
 becomes insane, a contract made with him is always made 
 on the supposition that the other contracting party can 
 prove he was in his sound mind when he dealt with him. 
 Ordinarily, if the imputation of insanity is raised, it must 
 1)6 proved by those asserting such a state of things to exist. 
 l>ut having established that at almost any prior time a per- 
 son was actually insane, then if he recovered the use of 
 his reason afterwards, and you dealt with him, the burden 
 of proof will be thrown upon you to show that such recovery 
 actually took place. The law will presume a continuance 
 of the same state of things. It does not require proof 
 that any person before it, is sane, unless when a 
 commission issues for that purpose. All persons are 
 assumed to be sane till the contrary is shewn — when the 
 contrarv has been shewn, then the law assumes a continued 
 state of insanity till a return to sanity is proved. 
 
 A sale of real estate to or by a man of unsound mind by 
 a person aware of the other parties insanity, is absolutely 
 void, and cannot be confirmed on a return of reason. There 
 is nothing to confirm. A new deed must be executed. But 
 a sale made by a man in a lucid interval is as valid as if 
 the person was never insane. The difficulty is to shew it 
 was made in a lucid interval. 
 
 Every man is legally either sane or insane, though the 
 capacity to contract is very slight, or perhaps altogether 
 wanting in some persons of weak mind. 
 
 'j 
 
12 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 If a man's sanity is doubtful, a contract made with him 
 must be under such circumstances, that the fullest scrutiny 
 could discover no advantage taken of him. If in the opinion 
 of those persons knowing him, he had sense or wit enough, 
 as is commonly said, to make such or such a bargain, and 
 had his own independent legal advice, then a client may 
 take upon himself to trust to the facts as he hears them. 
 But no professional man could of course take upon him- 
 self to decide what every other person could perhaps speak 
 more accurately upon. The most that can be said is, if 
 this man is in his right mind and knows what he is doing, 
 the sale will stand. 
 
 Of course if the lunacy of either contracting party is not 
 suspected, and if the contract is bona fide and fair, the sale 
 will hold good'; at least if it is executed, or executed in part, 
 so that the parties cannot altogether be restored to their 
 original position.' But such a purchase may pass into the 
 hands of a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, 
 and be unimpeachable, even if the original sale was un- 
 fairly obtained from a lunatic* 
 
 A person may be a lunatic in fact though not one in law. 
 If a lunatic has property requiring management, an appli- 
 cation can be made to the High Court of Justice, and if satis- 
 factory evidence is laid before it as to the state of mind of 
 the supposed lunatic, and of the necessity of a person or 
 persons being appointed to have charge of his j^erson and 
 estate, an order may be made declaring such person a luna- 
 tic, and naming a committee of his person and estate. In 
 case of a sale of his land, the committee executes for the 
 lunatic. In partition suits, where one of the parties is a 
 lunatic, and there is no committee, the court appoints a 
 guardian to watch over his interests. The practice has been 
 for the Registrar to execute the conveyances so far as the 
 lunatic is concerned. 
 
 • Beavcn v. McDonell, 9 Ex. 309. 
 
 » Addison on Contracts, 91, EccUs v. Lowry, 32 U. C. R. G40 ; Francis 
 V. St. Germain, 6 Grant 641. 
 
 3 Re McSherry, 10 Grant 390. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — PARTIES. 
 
 18 
 
 7. Other Disabilities. Besides the nature of un- 
 sound mind as unfitting a person from entering into a 
 contract, there are other matters that a conveyancer may 
 be called upon to advise in regard to the relationship of the 
 parties. No solicitor could of course lend his name to a 
 transaction where both parties were not free agents to con- 
 tract. The confidential relationships furnish some examples 
 occasionally to the Courts of worthless conveyances, where 
 undue influence or pressure was brought to bear in making 
 a contract or the appearance of one. A solicitor himself 
 has to exercise great caution and can very frequently be 
 thrown into a difficulty by being called upon to prove the 
 fairness of a transaction, in which the other party not 
 being a professional man like himself, has not been protected 
 by independent legal advice. Where in any case there is 
 great shrewdness and ability on the one hand, and great 
 ignorance and inaptness for business on the other, and 
 apparent unfairness in the transaction, there is always a 
 suspicion of over-reaching ; and though the Courts do not 
 pretend to make bargains for jDeople of sane minds, they 
 are anxious to find out if there are two people in each 
 bargain. Each must know his own rights and have a 
 chance to know them, and must not be improperly hurried 
 or deceived or forced into a bargain. Some bargains are 
 so unlikely to be the result of the cotiscjisus of two indepen- 
 dent minds, that the presence of independent advice is not 
 a certainty they will stand.' 
 
 Persons who purchase or convey under duress may 
 affirm or avoid the transaction whenever the duress has 
 ceased." 
 
 Persons completely under the influence of intoxicating 
 liquors may be said to be in somewhat the same position, 
 as regards contracting powers, as persons of unsound mind. 
 
 An alien is now under no disability. 
 
 u 
 
 'J 
 
 n 
 
 ■ HugHcnin v. Basclcy, 2 White & Tud L. Cas. Eq. 547 ; Bayley v« 
 Williams, 11 Jar. N. S. 23G. 
 = Leith & Smith's Blackstone, page 315. 
 
14 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 In Leitli & Smith's Blackstone we read (page 313) as to 
 disabilitiea by reason of crime : 
 
 " Persons attainted of treason, felony, nnfijircemiinim, are 
 incapable of conveying from tlie time of the offence com- 
 mitted provided attainder follows ; for such conveyance by 
 them may tend to defeat the king of his forfeiture or the 
 lord of his escheat. But they may purchase for the benelit 
 of the Crown or the lord of the fee, though they are dis- 
 abled to hold the lands so purchased, if after attainder, 
 being subject to immediate forfeiture : if before to escheat as 
 well as forfeiture, according to the nature of the crime." 
 
 III. SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CONTRACT AND 
 WHAT LAW GOVERNS IT. 
 
 The subject matter upon which the conveyancer has to 
 deal, is limited to hinds and chattels, and any interest 
 therein. 
 
 As regards real estate, the lex loci rei sit(e governs ; so that 
 lands outside this Province are disposed of according to 
 the law of the country in which they are situate. If the 
 parties live in Ontario, and the land is elsewhere, the 
 Courts could act in personam, so as to carry out 
 the contract respecting it, or complete whatever further 
 formalities or assurances were required by the foreign law.' 
 On the other hand, if the parties — whether non-residents 
 or aliens — reside outside of Ontario, they are bound the 
 same as residents, to comply with the formalities of our 
 law. 
 
 The student need not be reminded that the law of Eng- 
 land as to property was introduced into this Province as 
 long ago as the year 1792. Notwithstanding the wide 
 terms of the Provincial enactment effecting this transfer, it 
 readily appeared that all the statute law of England, and 
 indeed much of the customary law, was unsuited to a young 
 
 ' The Act respecting short forms of mortgages expressly restricts its 
 operation to land in Ontario. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — SHORT F0RM8. 
 
 15 
 
 colony such as Upper Canada then was, and so the Courts 
 very soon held that the Act must be construed with refer- 
 ence to the circumstances and wants of the Province, rather 
 than to the "general terms of the enactment. Tlie statutes 
 of Mortmain, afifectinj^ gifts of land for charitahlo uses, were, 
 however, held to be in force; and nearly all, if not all, the 
 statute and common law relating to landlord and tenant — 
 to writs of execution, etc., are in force here. An investi- 
 gation of this would be a discussion upon the law of real 
 property, which is outside of the present purpose of this 
 work. The student must familiarize himself with the law 
 of real property in England, before the year referred to, 
 through the medium of their older text writers ; must 
 watch the legislation in England, such as Acts like the 
 Trustee Relief Act, and others affecting conveyancing, and 
 must gi-ound himself in such subsequent matter as will be 
 found in Leith & Smith's edition of Blackstone. It is 
 necessary at the same time to keep abreast of the legisla- 
 tion made in our own Province. The Revised Statutes of 
 Ontario contain all the statutorv Provincial law on the 
 subject, up to and inclusive of the year 1877, and the writer 
 hopes that full reference will be made in these pages to all 
 sul)8equent legislation affecting his subject to the end of 
 the past session of 1881. 
 
 As to personal property, it may generally be said that 
 the law of the domicil of the owner governs, but a case is 
 not likely to arise in practical conveyancing where it will 
 be of importance to consider this. 
 
 lY. SHORT FORMS. 
 
 The present and past Legislatures in this Province have 
 copied the laws in the Mother country to a considerable 
 degree, but in regard to the laws respecting Real Property, 
 it is beyond question that we are much in advance. The 
 facility for searching titles, and for safely recording the 
 same, are far superior to what they are in England, and our 
 Acts respecting short forms of conveyances have proved a 
 great boon to the public. 
 
 i 
 
 
 «fl 
 
 I 
 
16 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 The English Hvstem rests mainly on the fidelity with which 
 conveyancing precedents have been followed. These, and the 
 writings of many distinguished conveyancers, have resulted 
 in establishing a sort of common law in this department 
 from which no practitioner there would feel himself at lib- 
 erty to depart. Their books are filled chietly with prece- 
 dents, and the reputation of the author is the host guarantee 
 of their usefulness. The legislature has not come to the 
 assistance of the general public with any forms of convey- 
 ance, and has not interfered in the law of real property to 
 any great extent. Where the title is not in copyhold, the 
 history of it is locked up in the breast of the family solicitor ; 
 and the general public outside of a few registry counties 
 can know but little of their own or their neighbour's title. 
 
 In Ontario, on the other hand, precedents have not the 
 same importance (perhaps not the importance they deserve) 
 which they have in England. The English precedents 
 were introduced here simultaneously with the law of prop- 
 erty, and indeed, those in use now were taken from English 
 writers, but reduced into less formidable limits. The statu- 
 tory forms given are not prescribed by the legislature as 
 conveyances which must be followed, but as precedents that 
 may be used. It is clear that they will be followed with 
 greater fidelity than those of the most distinguished con- 
 veyancer. They have a sort of implied sanction by a 
 supreme authority. 
 
 The use of statutory forms of conveyances, mortgages, 
 or leases, is liable to create a wrong impression in regard to 
 their intrinsic efficacy. When the Acts are closely exam- 
 ined, it will be found that there is no absolute certainty 
 guaranteed of their effecting the expected purpose, any more 
 than before the Acts were passed. Viewed by themselves, 
 they are incapable to effect anything that the same words 
 and formalities would not have effected theretofore. They 
 simply leave the duty of the conveyancer as it was before 
 the statute, and come to his assistance only in lessening 
 the description of such things as may be supposed to pass 
 by the instrument, such as houses, outhouses, edifices, etc., 
 
 tl 
 
INTRODUCTORY — SHORT FORMS. 
 
 17 
 
 and of being less minute in stating the covenants. But if 
 the conveyancer inchides all that is sot out in sec. 4 of the 
 Acts respecting conveyances and mortgages, and sec. 3 of 
 leases, and uses the second or expanded column in regard 
 to the covenants, he will have a conveyance quite as eflfoctual 
 as the statutory one. It is true that the words " lands," 
 and " party," are dutined in the two former Acts, but that 
 is of no practical use except for brevity's sake. A convey- 
 ance under the statute is eflfectual or not to pass the estate 
 in proportion as it would have been effectual before the 
 statute — it is in effect a common law conveyance by grant, 
 expanded by virtue of the Act, but it derives no other energy 
 from the statute. 
 
 jre 
 
 re 
 
 S8 
 
 The conveyancer can avail himself or not of the Acts 
 respecting short forms just as he jjleases, and his first con- 
 sideration will be, whether the Act will be of benefit to 
 him, or whether the conveyance he is concerned in is of so 
 special a nature that he can get along without any statutory 
 energy, without any amplifying by virtue of the Acts. It 
 is usual, unless with conveyancers of the oldest school, to 
 get the benefit of the Act, for a word may, if left to itself, be 
 dangerous, for how little or how much it may mean. Under 
 the statute the expanded form is given, and the effect can 
 be judged accordingly. In the convenants it is allowed to 
 introduce into or annex to any of the forms in the first 
 column, any express exceptions from, or other express quali- 
 fications thereof, respectively, and the like exceptions or 
 qualifications shall be taken to be made from or in the 
 corresponding forms in the second column. It m not neces- 
 sary either to use the form of the deed given ; any other 
 deed expressed to be made in pursuance of the particular 
 Act or referring thereto, will, so far as the covenants in it 
 are concerned, be taken to have the same effect, and be con- 
 strued as if it contained the form of words used in column 
 two of the schedule to the Act in question. Even if the 
 reference was incomplete, it will be as effectual to bind the 
 parties so far as the rules of law or equity will permit, as 
 if the Act ha("i not been made. 
 
 i 
 
 g 
 
 s 
 
 4 
 
 I 
 
 'j 
 
 s.c. 
 
18 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 The conveyancer can therefore use as much or as little 
 of the Act as he requires or chooses, and if the instrument 
 be a grant, lease or mortgage of lands, he can use any form 
 for the deed proper, and get the benefit of the statutes to 
 expand his covenants, or he can use the statutory deed and 
 abandon the covenants, or any one or more of them. 
 
 So far as the grant is concerned in each of the instru- 
 ments, referei^ce will be made hereafter to what is conveyed, 
 unless an exception is specially made therein. In grants 
 and mortgages the same things are included, except that in 
 the former nothing is said as to the reservations, limita- 
 tions, provisos and conditions in the grant from the Crown. 
 In leases the list is much shorter, and in the Act respecting 
 short forms of leases, if the premises are freehold, the 
 covenants and the proviso for re-entry apply to the lessor, 
 his heirs and assigns ; if leasehold to the lessor, his 
 executors, administrators and assigns, and the words 
 " Lands " and '* Party " are not defined or made part of 
 the Act as in the other two Acts. 
 
 The other parts of the three Acts are, when viewed with 
 their objects, identical. 
 
 It is chiefly as to the covenants that care must be taken. 
 A covenant operating, under the statute, may be read to 
 include the "heirs and assigns," or the "executors, 
 administrators and assigns," while one, not having the 
 assistance of the statute, may be construed a personal 
 covenant. It is laid down in the English cases that in the 
 power of sale in a mortgage, unless the "assigns" is 
 Inserted, the mortgagee only can sell. It is different under 
 our statutory mortgage where the assignee is in the same 
 position as the mortgagee. No case has laid down any rules 
 as to when under the statute such or such a covenant will 
 be construed to apply to the personal or legal representa- 
 tives. The general law must be looked at. 
 
 The case of Brown v. O'Dwyer' is a late case on the con- 
 struction of covenants, partly in the words of the short form 
 
 * 35 Q. B. 354. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — SHORT FORMS, 
 
 19 
 
 irith 
 
 con- 
 form 
 
 ':.i 
 
 i: 
 
 and partly omitting them. It was held that it was not a cove- 
 nant under the statute. The other covenants were, how- 
 ever, held to be statutory covenants. The distress clause 
 in mortgages has received a restricted meaning, and it has 
 been held that it is a mere license to take the mortgagee's 
 goods, and does not warrant the taking of a stranger's 
 goods on the mortgaged premises.* The Court of Common 
 Pleas held, in a case similar to Brown v. O'Dwyer, above, 
 that if a covenant omit the words "notwithstanding any 
 act of the said covenantor," though it is not in accordance 
 with the statute, it bound the covenantor as an absolute 
 covenant, that he was seized and had a right ttf convey in 
 fee simple.' 
 
 Notwithstanding all the ridicule that has been heaped on 
 short forms, " algebraic conveyancing," there is no doubt 
 but they are of immense advantage to the public. Besides 
 the certainty, they are a great saving of expense, where, as 
 in our Registry offices, the instruments are now entered at 
 full length, and charged by the folio. The objections raised 
 to them in England were more reasonable than might be 
 supposed, but fortunately here these have no existence. 
 After a purchaser had to pay fifty or a hundred pounds for 
 the investigation of the title to a few acres, perhaps he 
 would not object much to the additional costs of a lengthy 
 assurance. The absence of registration facilities will always 
 be a source of expenditure in the title to land — the perfec- 
 tion to which they are brought will be the best and simplest 
 way to transfer real property. It is to be hoped that be- 
 fore every man becomes his own conveyancer, the govern- 
 ment will arrange to have all transfers, &c., of land made 
 in the Registry office under its own supervision, and for 
 which it will be responsible.^ 
 
 ■ Laing v. The Ontario Loan and Savings Company, C. L. T., July, 1881, 
 page 423 ; and see Trust and Loan Company v. Lawrason now entered in 
 the Supreme Court. See post. 
 
 • McKay v. McKay, 31 C. P. i. 
 
 • Since the foregoing remarks on the efficacy of the Short Forms Acts 
 were put in type, the judgments in The Trust and Loan Company v. Law- 
 rason, in the Queen's Bench and in the Court of Appeal have come to 
 hand, and the language of Mr. Justice Cameion and Mr. Justice Patter- 
 son is to the same efiect as stated in the text. 
 
 i^ 
 
 .«2 
 
 s 
 
20 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 V. RECITALS. 
 
 Recitals are to be found in all sorts of conveyances, but 
 it may be generally said that they are essential to none. 
 Under our statute, amending the law of Vendor and Pur- 
 chaser and simplifiying titles/ they will be useful, as after 
 twenty years they are assumed to be true, unless the con- 
 trary is shewn. They embody such facts, or what are be- 
 lieved to be facts, as may be necessary to render the in- 
 strument more intelligible, but usually they do no more 
 than record these in writing — and frequently they lay bare 
 whatever defects have been in the titls. Where it may be 
 a matter of doubt whether or not recitals should be inserted 
 it will generally be safer to omit them. 
 
 VI. DATE. 
 
 No date is necessary in a deed, but a date is convenient, 
 and if there is any date it will be assumed that it is the 
 date of execution until the contrary is shewn. A false or 
 impossible date can be corrected and read in view of the 
 fact. A deed may be dated on one day and delivered on 
 another, but a deed should not be dated on a Sunday. All 
 sales and pm*chases, and all contracts and agreements for 
 sale or purchase of any real or personal property whatso- 
 ever, made by any person or persons on the Lord's day, 
 are utterly null and void.' 
 
 VII. DUPLICATE. 
 
 It is not necessary that conveyances of any kind should 
 be made in duplicate, but it is usual and convenient to have 
 them made so. The Registry Act requires an original de- 
 posited in the Registry office so far as instruments affecting 
 land are concerned, but the parties would have no convenient 
 evidences of their title if they retained no duplicates of the 
 
 ' R. S. O. cap. 109. 
 
 ' R. S. O. cap. 189, sec. 7. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — EXECUTION. 
 
 21 
 
 transaction. The Eegistrar's certificate endorsed on the 
 duplicate returned is evidence not only of the document, 
 but of the registration of it. In practice all instruments 
 affecting land are in duplicate excepting wills ; and all are 
 registered except leases not exceeding seven years where the 
 actual possession goes along with the lease.^ As between 
 the parties, neither execution in duplicate, nor registration 
 makes the transaction more binding or indefeasable. 
 
 The counter part of a deed is primary, and not secondary 
 evidence.' 
 
 VIII. EXECUTION. 
 
 When the conveyance is complete so far as the engross- 
 ment is concerned, the particulars to be observed are few, 
 but important. 
 
 If a person is unable to read or write, the deed should be 
 read over to him, but the mere omission to read it over to 
 him does not invalidate the deed*; though, if read differ- 
 ently from what it really is, there is no execution,* and if 
 an illiterate or blind person require the instrument to be 
 read, there is no sufficient execution unless this is complied 
 with*; and it is laid down generally in the old authors that 
 if the parties to the deed be illiterate, it ought to be read.* 
 Any alteration necessary to be made should be made then, 
 and any error corrected. A mis-description is a serious 
 matter, and should be particularly avoided — a misnomer, 
 though not a fatal objection if the party can be identified,' 
 is sometimes unfortunate, and always slovenly. A de- 
 scription of the parties, though not necessary, may be use- 
 ful for identification thereafter, and should be correct, and, 
 if possible, be the same as in former deeds by or to them. 
 
 I 
 
 58 1 
 
 Hi' 
 
 • R. S. O. cap. Ill, sec. 37, 
 
 ' Houghton V. Kanig, 18 C. B. 235. 
 
 3 Doe d. Biggard v. Millard, E. T. 3 Vic. 
 
 « Hatton V. Fish, 8 Q. B. 177. 
 
 5 Owens V. Thomas, 6 C. P. 383. 
 
 ' Shep. Touch, i cap. 4. 
 
 » James v. Whitebread, 17 L. T. 78. 
 
22 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 The date or place is not necessary generally speaking, but 
 in some instruments' the date is important, as a deed is 
 presumed to have been delivered on the day it bears date.' 
 A deed may have blank spaces, but it is not prudent to have it 
 so, as this might invite the insertion of words fraudulently 
 which has been done with cheques carelessly drawn up. It is 
 of course no objection to erase or interline a word or sentence, 
 but it is recommended to do the former by drawing the pen 
 through the words, so that the original state of the document 
 can be seen. It is desirable, though not essential, for the wit- 
 ness orwitnesses to put their initials opposite such erasures 
 or interlineations, but this chiefly to assist their memory 
 in order that they can swear as- to the state of the deed 
 before execution. If the date is erased it is not to be pre- 
 sumed to have been done after execution.* 
 
 In grants and mortgages it is usual to have the instru- 
 ments executed only by the conveying party, but in the 
 event of any covenants being entered into by the grantee, 
 his signatm'e is essen^jal to their validity. In a lease the 
 lessor and lessee both necessarily execute the instrument, 
 as there are covenants on both sides, and care must be 
 taken that all the parties lessors and lessees execute, other- 
 wise it may happen as in a recent case, that a party failing 
 to execute would not be bound on his covenant to pay the 
 rent.* 
 
 II! 
 
 III! 
 
 1. Signature. Signing is not essential to a deed 
 though it should never be dispensed with." All the parties 
 should sign their names if they can do so, although it is 
 sufficient if their names are written for them, even when 
 they can write. A signature by a mark is of course suffi- 
 cient, whether the person can write or not, but it is better 
 to have marks only where the person cannot write. It is 
 
 ' In bills of sale and chattel mortgages, where the registration must 
 take place within five days after execution, in deeds under the Mortmain 
 Act, etc. "^ 
 
 » Hayward v. Thackcr, 31 Q, B. 427. 
 
 3 Frazer v. Frazer, 14 C. P. 70. 
 
 4 Piper V. Simpson, 6 Ont. App. Rep. 175. 
 
 5 yudge V. Thompson, 29 Q. B. 523. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — EXECUTION. 
 
 28 
 
 not necessary that the parties sign at the one time, or in 
 presence of the same witness, or in presence of each 
 other ; and no instruments require more than one witness, 
 except deeds of land for charitable uses under the Statutes 
 of Mortmain, or other statutes requiring two or more wit- 
 nesses — instruments executed under powers requiring two 
 or more witnesses and wills. It was attempted to compel 
 executors who were empowered under a will to sell lands, to 
 sign in presence of each other like arbitrators executing an 
 award, but the Court held it unnecessary.* There is ap- 
 parently no absolute necessity to put the hand on the seal 
 in executing, or to state that you sign or deliver the instru- 
 ment as your deed.* -It is not decided whether, one 
 partner signing the name of his partnership firm opposite 
 one seal, the one or both partners can be held liable in the 
 deed*; but where four parties, described as a collective 
 body, and not corporate, signed and sealed a deed with 
 their own names and seals, they were held to be individu- 
 ally bound.* And where one of two partners signed in the 
 name of both in the presence of the other, and for him with 
 his assent, though there was but one seal, it was held to be 
 the deed of both,* and two or more persons may use the 
 same seal.* Where a seal was set opposite to the name of 
 the party signing, the document must be treated as under 
 seal, though the testatum clause is, "I hereby subscribe 
 myself, &c." ' 
 
 A deed may generally be executed by an attorney, whose 
 appointment is made by deed. The attorney should not be 
 made a party to the deed, nor should he sign his own name. 
 He executes by signing the name of his principal, and add- 
 ing " by his attorney." 
 
 S 
 
 ' Little v. Aikinan, 28 Q. B. 337. 
 'Huttonw. yisk.S Q. B. 177. 
 ^ Moor V, Boyd, 23 Q. B. 459. 
 * Ctillcn V. Nickerson, 10 C. F. 549. 
 
 5 Moor V. Boyd, 15 C. P. 513. 
 
 6 Ball V. Dunstervillc, 4 T, R. 313. 
 
 7 Whittier v. McLennan, 13. Q. B. 638. 
 
^■^ 
 
 24 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 III! 
 iili' 
 
 "IMI 
 "llll 
 
 2. Sealing, The seals should be put on an instrument be- 
 fore there is any attempted execution. A person, signing 
 a document on which the seal is omitted, should, after the 
 seal is put on, acknowledge the seal and his signature.^ 
 No deed is ready for execution until the seals are put on ; 
 indeed it cannot properly be called a deed until then, and 
 the fact that a pirty may intend to execute it as a deed, 
 and though the testatum may declare it to be duly signed 
 and sealed, will not make a deed of it. On the other hand, 
 the case of "VVliittier v. McLennan' goes to show that even 
 where the part^ '^as described in the testatum as simply 
 "subscribing, ' the w< piuce of the seal was sufficient. 
 
 "What is a sufficient toal has been up in our courts several 
 times. Although • t may happen that an impression upon the 
 paper without wax or ti/'y erroneous substance is a suffi- 
 cient seal* still no risk ought to be run in the hopes that 
 the deed may be brought within the limits of some boun- 
 dary cases. A circular flourish O is not a legal seal,* nor will 
 marking the paper opposite the signature with the end of a 
 poker, be held to be a sealed instrument*; and it took the 
 Court of Appeal to decide authoritatively that slits cut 
 through the parchment, and a ribbon woven through so as 
 to appear on the face of the instrument at intervals of the 
 signatures, should be recognized as seals.* A deed may 
 have its seal and signature torn or otherwise mutilated by 
 accident, or the effect of time, without being invalidated.'' 
 The omission of a seal is discussed by the late Chief Jus- 
 tice Moss in the cases of Wright v. The Sun Mutual Life 
 Insurance Co. and Wright v. The London Life Assurance 
 Co." 
 
 Execution by a corporation where sealing is the important 
 part, deserves some special mention. The corporate seal 
 
 » Ball V. Dunsterville, 4 T. R. 313. 
 
 13 Q. B. 638. 
 3 Foster v. Geddes, 14 Q. B. 239. 
 ■* Nagle V. Kilts, Taylor 269. 
 s Clement v. Donaldson, 9 Q. B. 299. 
 ' Hamilton v. Dennis, 12 Chy. 325. 
 
 7 Doe d. Ellis v. McGill. 8 Q. B. 224. 
 
 8 5 Ont. App. Repts. 218. 
 
 Todd V. Cain. 16 Q. B. 516. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — EXECUTION. 
 
 25 
 
 affixed to a contract or conveyance, does not render the in- 
 strument a corporate act, unless it is affixed by an officer 
 or agent duly authorized/ It must be affixed by an officer 
 to whose custody it is confided, or some person specially 
 authorized, the officer or special agent, acting in conse- 
 quence of the directing vote of the body or managing board 
 of the corporation, as the case may be. The deed should 
 then be signed by some officer of the corporation with, *' In 
 testimony whereof the common seal of said corporation is 
 hereunto affixed," and the seal then affixed.' So far as om* 
 Kegistry Act is concerned, the Secretary or presiding officer 
 may or may not sign a deed from a corporation. 
 
 3. Delivery. A deed is not properly executed by sign- 
 ing or sealing, or both. It must be delivered to the party 
 entitled, or to some one for him. If not actually or pre- 
 sumably delivered, it remains an escrow until the condition 
 of its detention be fulfilled.* No form of words is ne- 
 cessary to constitute the delivery of a deed as an escrow, 
 but the facts and surrounding circumstances may be look- 
 ed at, to see whether such was the intention of the parties.* 
 Unless held as an escrow^ihe execution will be deemed com- 
 plete, and the delivery of a conveyance implies that it will 
 be executed.* This formality is the consummation of the 
 instrument, after that the party making it can have no 
 further control over it. A deed will be assumed to be de- 
 livered on the day it bears date,* and if the date is erased 
 it is not to be presumed to have been done after execution, 
 and even if it were so erased, the deed takes effect from its 
 delivery.' 
 
 « Jackson V. Campbell, 5 Wend. N. Y. Repts. 572. 
 
 = Thornton on conveyancing, 23, and see therein as to requisites where 
 there is no statutory directions as to execution, 
 
 3The deed cannot remain as an escrow in the hands of the grantee for 
 the giving of the deed to him would be construed an absolute delivery. 
 The purpose for which it is placed in the hands of a stranger must be duly 
 announced. (Thornton's Conveyancing, page 8). 
 
 •* O'Connor v. Beatty, 27 C. P. 203. 
 
 5 Whittier v. McLennan, 13 Q. B. 638. 
 
 * Hay ward v. Thacker, 31 Q. B. 427. 
 
 7 Fraser v. Fraser, 14 C. P. 70. 
 
 I 
 
 ^ ,,1 
 
26 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 'Ill: 
 
 .•iiiii 
 "1)111 
 
 IX. WITNESSING AND PROOF OF EXECUTION. 
 
 Unlike a will, a deed need not be signed by the attesting 
 witness at the time of execution, nor indeed is it rendered 
 invalid by the omission to do so at any time thereafter. 
 The fact of sealing and delivery may be proved like any 
 other matter of fact,' and an instrument may be proved by 
 admission under the provisions of our Registry Act. A 
 deed under a power of appointment may require not only an 
 attesting witnesss, but two or three witnesses, who may be 
 required to sign their names as on the execution of a will. 
 No matter what solemnities are enjoined by the power, it is 
 now sufficient if the instrument be executed in the presence 
 of, and attested by, two or more witnesses in the manner in 
 which deeds are ordinarily executed.' In conveyances under 
 the Mortmain Act two witnesses are necessary. 
 
 None of the parties to a deed should be a subscribing wit- 
 ness thereto, nor should any of them take the affidavit of the 
 subscribing witness. It is not necessary that the witness 
 be of full age, but he should be old enough to be competent to 
 give testimony on oath, and to understand the nature of an 
 oath. Some sensible person not concerned in the transac- 
 tion should be selected, and he should either know the 
 parties, or take such a mental note of the transaction, as 
 may enable him to identify them if necessary thereafter. 
 It is not necessary that the witness should have known the 
 parties, but it is often very desirable that he should know 
 and identify them thereafter. Sometimes the handwriting 
 has to be depended upon, and very often an attesting wit- 
 ness will say that he does not recollect the fact of execu- 
 tion, but that seeing his own signature to the attestation 
 clause, he has no doubt that he saw the deed executed. 
 But where the sister of the person said to have executed a 
 deed swore that the signature was not in her brother's 
 handwriting, the court held the deed to be a forgery, not- 
 
 ' Leith & Smith's Blackstone, 342. 
 ' R. S. O. cap. 98, sec. 10. 
 
INTRODUCTORY — ALTERATION, CANCELLATION. 
 
 27 
 
 withstanding that the witness was a professional man, and 
 deposed that he had no reason to believe but the sig- 
 nature was that of the grantor/ In the absence of contra- 
 dictory evidence, such evidence of execution would have 
 been sufficient.' 
 
 The statutory affidavit prescribed by the Registry Act, 
 and which is generally necessary to be sworn before regis- 
 tration, is not free from the fault of being somewhat incon- 
 sistent on the face of it. For to swear in one paragraph 
 that the deponent saw John Smith and Jane Smith his wife, 
 parties thereto, sign the deed in question, and in 
 the next to swear that he does not know the said parties, 
 looks to the unlearned as something akin to perjury. It is 
 usual, of course, to introduce witnesses to the parties — it is 
 the least and sometimes the most that can be done, but 
 whatever the Legislature meant by the paragraph about his 
 "knowing" the parties, there is no doubt but it has given rise 
 to inconvenience in many cases, and might be altered with 
 advantage. 
 
 The several copies of the deed should be sworn to, not 
 that it is necessary, but as a matter of convenience there- 
 after. A mandamus will He to compel a witness to prove 
 the execution of a deed and memorial for registry.* 
 
 No affidavit of execution is required to the seal of any 
 Court of Eecord, or of any corporation ; and as to corpora- 
 tions, the secretary or presiding officer may, or may not 
 sign.* 
 
 X. ALTERATION, CANCELLATION. 
 
 Mutilation or defacement in a deed of grant regularly 
 executed, cannot invalidate it,* and the cancellation of a 
 
 
 c 
 
 
 
 «? 
 
 3;e!« 
 
 
 a 
 
 » Duffy V. Smith, 26 Chy. 428. 
 
 ' Maughan v. Hubbard, 8 B. & C. 16. 
 
 3 Regina v. O'Meara, 15 Q. B. 201, and see now Registry Act, R. S. O. 
 cap. Ill, sec. 44. 
 
 * R. S. O. cap. Ill, sec. 48. 
 
 5 An altered deed is a new deed, and where the parties consent to a 
 material alteration after its execution, it will be inoperative unless followed 
 by a re-execution as an original deed. Coit v. Stockweather, 8 Con. R. 289. 
 
28 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 deed does not divest the estate which has passed by it.^ 
 Any alteration to be made, must be made at the time, and 
 the instrument re-executed, and a person who has executed 
 a deed is not bound by an alteration made in his absence, 
 though made by his verbal direction ; yet, if his acts done 
 under this verbal direction are unequivocal, and consistent 
 only with his positive consent, he is bound by it.' And a 
 blank in a bond which was afterwards filled in with the con- 
 sent of a party to it, was held to be no variance in a plea 
 of non eat factum, though it was not filled in, in the party's 
 presence.* 
 
 In McDonald v. McDonald, where a deed of land pur- 
 ported to be executed in the plaintiff's favor was drawn up, 
 delivered and witnessed, and sworn to, but afterwards torn 
 up in a fit of anger, it was held that the plaintiff having 
 collected the pieces and stitched them together, the land 
 vested under this deed in the plaintiff.* 
 
 ""11 
 
 '•tinil 
 "llilil 
 
 XI. EEGISTRATION. 
 
 After execution — that is sealing and delivery — no other 
 formalities are required by the parties. There is no Stamp 
 Act in this Province like the one in England, and even 
 where deeds are executed in England conveying lands in 
 this Province, they do not require to be stamped under the pro- 
 visions of the English Act, but are valid here without being 
 stamped.* Registration is not generally necessary in any 
 case as between the parties," but it is a necessary protection 
 to the grantee as against subsequent purchasers for value 
 without notice who claim under a similar instrument duly 
 registered. As regards personal property, an instrument 
 not filed in the proper office is void, not only as to those 
 
 • Fraser v. Fralick, 21 Q. B. 343. 
 
 » Martin v. Hanning, 26 Q. B. 80. 
 
 3 Leonard v. Merritt, Dra. 281. 
 
 < McDonald v. McDonald, 44 Q. B. 291. 
 
 s Murray v. Van Brocklin, i Chy. Cha. 300, per Mowat, V.C. 
 
 * Unless where prescribed by a statute affecting them, as with some 
 private corporations, and conveyances under the Mortmain Acts must be 
 registered. 
 
 
 d 
 
 
 
 
 ■■' 
 
 r 
 
 
 s 
 
 
 r 
 
 
 F 
 
INTRODUCTORY — REGISTRATION. 
 
 29 
 
 which are so registered, but also as to creditors, whether 
 registered or not. 
 
 Deeds should be registered as soon as conveniently may 
 be after execution, as well to have the evidences of title in 
 secure keeping, as to prevent the purchaser from being shut 
 out altogether by a prior registration from a fraudulent 
 vendor. In most cases there is no virtue in the registration 
 per se: the deed transfers the land, and even if it were lost 
 or destroyed the next moment after execution, the title in 
 the vendee would be good, though the evidences of it would 
 not be 80 patent. No particular time is assigned within 
 which one is required to register an instrument, nor, with 
 the exception of deeds of grant under the Mortmain Act, and 
 bills of sale, and chattel mortgages, there is no necessity to 
 register or file them at all, but it is the uniform practice 
 to do so, and the omission may be serious loss to the party 
 purchasing any interest under the instrument. 
 
 No instrument is registered before the patent, except those 
 creating a mortgage, lien or encumbrance on the land.^ 
 
 Where a lease for a period less than seven years, not 
 requiring registration, as actual possession went with it, con- 
 tains covenants to renew beyond a period of seven years, 
 the latter circumstance does not render registration neces- 
 sary. And so, where a lease was made for four years with 
 covenant to renew for four years more, it was held that it 
 did not require registration where actual possession went 
 with it*; but all leases for a longer term than seven years, 
 and all leases under that period where actual possession 
 does not go along with the lease, are under the provisions 
 of the Eegistry Act.* 
 
 Every deed of land sold for arrears of taxes must be 
 registered within eighteen months after the sale, and all 
 sales of land under any process issued out of Court must be 
 registered six months after the sale,* in order to protect the 
 l)urchaser from any intervening sale by the former owner. 
 
 9 
 
 c 
 
 * 
 
 
 ' Holland v. Moore, I2 Chy. 296. 
 
 • Davidson v. McKay, 26 Q. B. 306; Latch v. Bright, 16 Chy. 653. 
 3 R. S. O. cap. Ill, sec. 37. 
 
 * R. S. O. cap. Ill, sec. 76. 
 
CHAPTER II. 
 
 TITLE TO REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY. 
 
 I. REAL ESTATE. 
 
 I. 
 
 Preli.minary. 
 
 
 5. Power of Sale. 
 
 II. 
 III. 
 
 Solicitor's Abstract. 
 Registrar's Abstract 
 
 
 6. Vesting Order. 
 
 7. Lis Pendens. 
 
 S. Mechanics' Liens. 
 9. Insolvency. 
 10. Tax Title, 
 
 IV. 
 V. 
 
 Vendor and Purchaser Act. 
 
 Crown Grant and Early 
 Registrations. 
 
 VI. 
 
 Particular Titles: 
 
 
 VII, Other Encumbrances 
 
 
 I. Possession. 
 
 
 I. Liens. 
 
 
 2. Wills. 
 
 
 2. Bonds. 
 
 
 3. Inheritance. 
 
 
 3. Writs. 
 
 
 4. Decree. 
 
 
 4. Arrears of Taxes. 
 
 'il;;; 
 lii!';; 
 
 "IIIIIM 
 
 II. PERSONAL PROPERTY. 
 
 I. Preliminary 
 II. Searches: 
 
 I. County Court Office. 
 
 2. Sheriff's and Bailiff's Office. 
 
 3. Rent in Arrcar. 
 
 4. Liens. 
 
 I. PRELIMINARY. 
 
 In no part of the ordinary duties of a lawyer is there 
 more responsibility than in the investigation of title to real 
 estate, with a view to certifying to its good character. In 
 a litigation, where the chances for and against success are 
 considered in the progress of the case, the client comes, in 
 
TITLE TO REAL ESTATE — SOLICITOR 8 ABSTRACT. 
 
 81 
 
 a great many instances, to regard the final issue as something 
 he could not fairly expect any human being to decide upon ; 
 but when a title to lands is to be enquired into, he looks 
 upon the enquiry as one capable of leading to almost mathe- 
 matical certainty. Should the title turn out to be bad in 
 his hands, notwithstanding any admonitions or reserva- 
 tions, it is not unusual to find blame cast upon the solici- 
 tor. This is especially the case with the man who will run 
 no risks, but yet does not want the purchase to fall through 
 — he wants the responsibility shifted to the shoulders of the 
 solicitor. 
 
 Nothing short of experience will render a person com- 
 petent to cope with all the little difficulties that may beset 
 the enquiry as to a title being a good one, and this experience 
 can be had only after the acquisition of a fair kiowledge 
 of the laws relating to real property. The student who 
 hopes to become a good conveyancer must ground himself 
 in the principles set out in Blackstone and Williams, as 
 well as be familiar with the statute law of on own Province , 
 he must be familiar with what is necessary to convey by 
 express grant, or by implication of law — how title may be 
 acquired in one person, and how lost in another — what 
 dowers must be barred or released, what writs cleared out 
 of his way, what presumptions he can trust, and what evi- 
 dence, primary and secondary, he may require, or the next 
 purchaser may require of his client. All these are but a 
 small part of his duty, and will be set out more in detail 
 immediately. 
 
 It will probably be better to make some observations on 
 the practical steps to be taken in acting for the purchaser of 
 a piece of land, on the assumption that his vendor is bound 
 to furnish him with evidences of a good title. 
 
 II. SOLICITOE'S ABSTRACT. 
 
 I 
 
 k 2 
 
 1 
 
 ••6 
 
 u 
 
 I) 
 
 At present it would seem that long abstracts — solicitor's 
 abstracts — are not often required. But the vendor is bound 
 to make out a perfect abstract, and an abstract which does 
 not state with precision the material parts of all documents 
 
32 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 and other facts affecting the title, is imperfect.^ A full and 
 sufficient abstract of title means a perfect abstract of such 
 title as the vendor has.* 
 
 An abstract shewing a good title is not sufficient ; it must 
 be verified'; and a vendor is bound, at his own expense, to 
 furnish a purchaser with copies of all instruments relating 
 to the title which are not of record*; and so is bound where, 
 prior to 1867, only memorials were registered. Where the 
 title is a registered one the chain must be complete.* A 
 Kegistrar's abstract does not seem to be sufficient evidence.* 
 
 As to what is a perfect abstract, see Keyse v. Haydon, 20 
 L. T. 244 ; Bkd v. Fox, 11 Hare 40. 
 
 III. REGISTRAR'S ABSTRACT. 
 
 IMllI 
 
 : i. 
 
 Mill III 
 
 When it is impossible to make a personal search in the 
 Registry office where the lands are situate, the first thing 
 necessary is to get a Registrar's abstract beginning back, 
 either at the patent of the Crown, or at a point from which 
 it is certain that the title was unquestionably good. In the 
 large cities, and especially in Toronto, the names of well- 
 known estates — the Jarvis, the Crookshank, the Elmsley — 
 are, with many others, considered good at the date held by 
 the then owners, and a search beyond that is seldom made. 
 However, what one person may take as good, another may 
 reject, and, unless in a few cases, the tracing of title from 
 the Crown by an experienced conveyancer, does not require 
 a great expenditure of time. 
 
 Suppose the abstract books in the Registry Office, or the 
 Registrar's abstract, contained, amongst others, the follow- 
 ing entries : — 
 
 ' Hayes" Con., page 147. 
 
 " Blackburn v. Smith, 2 Ex. 783, 
 
 3 Granger v. Latham, 14 Chy. 209. 
 
 4 Re Charles, 4 Chy. Cha. 19. 
 
 s Kitchen v. Murray, 16 C. P. 69. 
 ' Reed V. Ranks, 10 C. P. 202. 
 
TITLE TO REAL ESTATE — REGISTRAR S ABSTRACT. 
 
 33 
 
 INSTRUMENT 
 
 DATE. 
 
 REGISTRA- 
 TION. 
 
 Patent 
 
 B. & S 
 
 G. & P 
 
 Mortgage. . . 
 
 B.&S 
 
 A. of M ... . 
 
 G. &P 
 
 Mortgage . . 
 Sh.DeedP'l 
 
 B.&S 
 
 Will 
 
 B.&S 
 
 Decree 
 
 B.&S 
 
 M 
 
 Grant 
 
 V. O 
 
 L. P 
 
 Mech. L 
 
 D. of Bill... 
 Convey .... 
 
 14 June, 
 ID Mar., 
 II July, 
 16 Aug., 
 16 July, 
 
 15 July, 
 
 16 May, 
 
 I June, 
 Dec, 
 
 5 July, 
 .\pril, 
 Jan., 
 
 II Aug., 
 9 Nov., 
 9 Nov., 
 16 July, 
 25 Mar., 
 19 Sept., 
 liaOct., 
 J4 Mar., 
 
 Is July, 
 
 GRANTOR. 
 
 1791 17 July, 
 1827120 Mar., 
 
 1830 
 1831 
 
 1828 
 
 1833 
 1830 
 
 1830 
 1834 
 
 16 Aug., 
 
 15 July, 
 isjuly, 
 
 16 July, 
 16 July, 
 II Dec, 
 
 4 Jan., 
 1855:5 Aug., 
 i859]3 July, 
 1865^6 Jan., 
 1870 13 Oct., 
 i87o'ii Nov., 
 187011 Nov., 
 iS7i'2i July, 
 1872 8 June, 
 1872: 12 Sept., 
 i874'i2 Oct., 
 1875 10 May, 
 1876' 10 July, 
 
 Tax Deed . . I3 Sept., i878'4 Nov., 
 
 1825 
 
 i827|EIiza Brown 
 iS3iiJohn Smith , 
 
 1832 Henry Wood 
 i832iJohn Curry. , 
 i833john Smith . 
 
 1833 E. Bond.... , 
 1834IH. Wood .., 
 
 i835|Sheriff 
 
 1856'A. Johnson . 
 
 1862 J. Lynch 
 
 i867Jjohn Moran . 
 
 1870' 
 
 1 87c 'John Wells .. 
 
 1870 Step. Moore . 
 
 1871 John Wells . 
 
 1872 Ct. of Chancery .. 
 1872 John Doe, plff.... 
 
 1874 John Masson. . . . 
 
 1875 .John Doe 
 
 1876 John Late, official 
 
 assignee. 
 i878:The Warden and 
 j Treasurer of the 
 I County of York. 
 
 GRANTEE. 
 
 John Brown. 
 John Smith. 
 Henry Wood. 
 John Smith. 
 E. Bond. 
 M. Jones. 
 
 E. Hughes. 
 
 F. Leduc 
 A. Ward. 
 J. Lynch. 
 George Moran. 
 James Taylor. 
 John Wells. 
 Step. Moore. 
 John Wells. 
 
 A. Wright. 
 J. Walker. 
 J. Walker. 
 J. Walker. 
 J. Walker. 
 J. Bell. 
 
 A. Jones. 
 
 In going over such an abstract with the deeds produced, 
 something has to be noted at each step. 
 
 Let the student first of all divide up the age of his title, 
 that is, from the issue of the patent to the time of his search, 
 into two periods — one extending from the date of patent to 
 within twenty years of his search, and the other during the 
 remaining twenty years. As to the former period he will 
 be easily satisfied — recitals in deeds to be accepted as true 
 unless proved to be inaccurate, undischarged mortgages 
 presumably paid, outstanding dower likely to be barred, 
 
 I 
 
 h 
 r, 
 
 '3 
 
 IV. VENDOR AND PUrtCHASER'S ACT. 
 
 For now, by Rev. Stat. 109, all recitals, statements, and 
 descriptions of facts, matters and parties contained in 
 deeds, instruments. Acts of Parliament, or statutory decla- 
 rations twenty years old are sufficient, unless proved to be 
 inaccurate ; as also all registered memorials of discharged 
 mortgages. 
 
 o's.c. 3 
 
34 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 Registered memorials twenty years old of other instru- 
 ments, if executed by the grantor are good, if possession is 
 consistent with the title, and receipts of payment in a regis- 
 tered deed good, unless proved inaccurate. But as the 
 Act does not apply to matters arising within twenty years, 
 evidence is required to satisfy one that the title is, during 
 such period, what it appears to be. 
 
 'Ill 
 li!: 
 
 iM 
 \\', i 
 inilllll 
 IIMiinl 
 
 V. CROWN GRANT, Etc. 
 
 The Crown grant is not usually looked into, though, when 
 it is registered, as it may be by a sworn copy, it may be for 
 the purpose of drawing attention to something special in it, 
 and so ought to be read over. 
 
 In our supposed title the patent gives title to John 
 Brown, and as Eliza Brown presumes to sell, it must be 
 either as an heiress, or by virtue of some instrument not 
 registered. At the great distance of time, nearly sixty 
 years, it is not likely that one could get, or require, any 
 better evidence than a recital in one of the early title deeds, 
 that she is the only daughter and heiress of John Brown ; 
 and if the recital continues to state that she is unmarried, 
 then any reference as to the formalities of a consenting 
 husband may be dispensed with, and in case there is due 
 execution of the deed to John Smith, a duly signed receipt 
 for the purchase money, the usual covenants, and the 
 necessary operative words,' then the property would appear 
 to be vested in a new owner, John Smith. If such evidence 
 be not forthcoming, but if possession has gone with the 
 title, the title should be accepted. There should be no 
 doubt that the grantee got the right parcel of land, and this 
 must of course never be lost sight of in all the subsequent 
 changes in the title. 
 
 A mortgage registered before the issue of the patent has 
 the same effect as if made after the patent was issued." 
 
 • See Taylor on Titles Introduction, page 5. 
 ' Watson V. Lindsay, 27 Chy. 253. 
 
TITLE TO REAL ESTATE — CROWN GRANT, ETC. 
 
 35 
 
 due 
 jeipt 
 the 
 pear 
 ence 
 the 
 no 
 this 
 uent 
 
 has 
 
 John Smith now by deed conveys to Henry Wood, and 
 Wood gives a mortgage back. The deed may be lost and 
 you may have no copy, and the memorial may do little 
 more than assure you which parcel was sold, and whether 
 your parcel is part of it or not ; J(>lin Smith may have had 
 a wife, and, if so, she should have barred her dower. At the 
 supposed date (1830), no separate examination or certificate 
 was necessary. In all probability she is dead, and so the 
 apparently outstanding dower will at a distance so remote 
 be not a serious obstacle. Enquiry, however, should be 
 made, and if no trace of her can be found, it will render it 
 safer to rely upon the probability of her being dead. 
 
 Wood mortgages the place back to his vendor, no doubt 
 to secure the purchase money, and you pursue your en- 
 quh'ies as to such mortgage until you find that it has been 
 discharged, or get Wood's title extinguished by sale, or 
 vesting order or decree. Of course, if no payment has been 
 made on the mortgage debt within a period of ten years 
 since it became due, the mortgage ceases to be a lien or 
 charge on the land, and after twenty years the covenant for 
 debt is gone. The mortgage may not be on the whole lot. 
 
 As to this, as well as all other conveyances, see that they 
 refer to your lot, as after commendable diligence in ferret- 
 ing out its history, it may be of no value to you in your 
 present enquiry. Later on, you will find this mortgage 
 assigned to M. Jones, who now stands in Smith's shoes, 
 though the encumbrance remains the same ; if^ however, 
 neither W^ood, Jones, Smith, nor the mortgage can be found, 
 nor any evidence as to payment, or non-payment, but little, 
 if any, risk will be assumed in passing the title after so great 
 a lapse of time. 
 
 In the next entry you will find John Curry, most unwar- 
 rantably, as it would seem, selling to E. Bond, and it will 
 be a relief to you, if it turns out to be a conveyance of some 
 other parcel of land; but if not, then you must inquire 
 how Curry could get title, if indeed he had title. The first 
 thing to decide is, who is the last registered owner prior to 
 the date of this deed, and going back you will find it to be 
 
 2 
 
 9 
 
 : 
 
 i i 
 
 ^0 2 
 
86 
 
 PBACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 lilihl 
 iiiiiiiiil 
 
 Henry Wood. He was the owner, and now Curry sells. 
 He may be his hen*, possibly his devisee, or a trustee under 
 his will. 
 
 If you read over the deed conveying to Bond, you may 
 find recitals to give you the required information ; and later 
 on you may find a deed of trust itself registered in full. If 
 not, this may turn out to be a defect in the paper title not 
 cured by any subsequent registration. It is not to be con- 
 cluded by this that the title in the subsequent holder is a 
 bad one ; it may be cured by a possessory title, and, if not, 
 the necessary evidence may be found outside the registry 
 office. At the distance of time supposed, ordinarily there 
 would either be many subsequent changes in the title in 
 which the defect would be remedied or explained, or the new 
 owner would acquire a title by length of possession. Where 
 such a state of registrations would require further assur- 
 ance, a quit claim deed could be asked from the former regis- 
 tered owner or his heirs. 
 
 In experience in almost every title something must be 
 done to supplement the paper title, either in a remedial or 
 explanatory way. 
 
 Assuming that Bond has a good title, and his deed having 
 been regular in every respect, pursue such enquiry till you 
 come down to your own vendor, getting rid as you proceed 
 of all encumbrances, and noting whatever defect there is in 
 any of the deeds as to dower, receipts covenants ; also, as to 
 special clauses, qualifying grants raising trusts, etc., rely- 
 ing on recitals only when they are over twenty years old, 
 looking into discharges of mortgages, trust deeds, etc. The 
 sheriff's deed given to A. Ward may be on a sale for taxes, 
 and so may have been worth as little as the generality of 
 such deeds, but by several statutes time cures their defects, 
 and in an abstract a title seldom depends on a tax-deed — 
 though deeds on execution of writs against lands are fre- 
 quent, and not open to the same objections. A valid judg- 
 ment must be found entered in the proper ofiice, and the 
 writ acted upon during its currency ; but apparently it is 
 
TITLE TO REAL ESTATE — PARTICULAR TITLES. 
 
 87 
 
 not necessary to make enquiries as to the return of the writ 
 against goods, nor as to the advertisement.* 
 
 VI. PARTICULAR TITLES. 
 
 :es, 
 of 
 
 3ts, 
 
 I 
 
 1. Possession. The deed from Johnson to Lynch 
 seems a surprise, and on reading over the deed it may 
 happen that no former owner is referred to by recital or 
 otherwise. He may claim neither by inheritance nor by 
 devise — may not be a trustee, but he may, when you look 
 closer into the facts, have a title by length of possession. 
 He may, under the old law, be in possession as against the 
 true owner or owners for over twenty years, and under such 
 circumstances that his title by possession — the parliamen- 
 tary title — may be good. The status of the owners, when 
 adverse possession began, and the state of the law then 
 must also be considered. If the owners were under disa- 
 bility, such as infancy, lunacy, or covertm'e, this twenty 
 years would not be sufficient, and if the land be wild land, 
 then twenty years' possession would not in either case make a 
 good title.* Again, it is only those who are the rightful im- 
 mediate owners who are barred. It would not affect re- 
 mainder men. The possession then must be continuous ; 
 indeed, so many points are necessary, and the evidence to 
 pass such a title so extensive, that most purchasers would 
 require either sufficient evidence that all the former owners 
 are dead, or would require a certificate under the Quieting 
 Titles' Act. Because, formerly, to be out of possession for 
 forty years was no bar unless some one else was in posses- 
 sion,'* and it must be shewn not only that the plaintiff is out 
 of possession for twenty years, but tliat it is in the actual 
 possession of another.* Where the adverse party is patentee 
 of the Crown, one must shew that the patentee or his heir 
 had knowledge of such possession, or must shew a forty 
 
 ' See cases cited by Mr. Taylor — Taylor on Titles, page iii. A case is 
 now pending in the Court of Appeal in reference to these points. 
 
 ' R. S. O. cap. io8, sec. 5. 43. 
 
 J Ketchum v, Mighton, 14 Q. B. 99, 
 
 * Lloyd V. Henderson, 25 C. P. 253, 
 
88 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 :;i;ill 
 
 I;;m|, 
 itiiiiiii 
 
 years' possession.* In title by possession, the whole of the 
 land must have been actually cleared and occupied for the 
 required time — the title to any part not shewn to be such is 
 not good.* 
 
 2, "Wills. The next change of title is where the last 
 purchaser makes his will, and devises the land in question. 
 A will over thirty years from its date proves itself,and the pro- 
 bate is ordinarily sufficient proof — if not proved then the 
 execution must be proved — and proved conformably to the 
 statute then in force, and the original will produced of course 
 for that purpose. The exact terms of the devise through 
 which the vendor claims, and the effect of the words used 
 must be considered, as difficulties of construction often 
 arise.' Legacies or annuities charged upon lands form a 
 lien thereon ; and where title is derived through a will it is 
 necessary to see that any legacies or annuities charged on 
 the lands therein have either been paid, or that the pur- 
 chaser got a release from the legatee or annuitant. The 
 probate is evidence of the testator's death, as well as of his 
 having made a will,* and that the will was executed accord- 
 ing to the law of the country where the testator was domi- 
 ciled, but it does not decide the question of domicile.* 
 
 It may be said that a title derived from a will is regarded 
 by conveyancers as the worst kind of title. 
 
 3. Inheritance. By the next convej^ance, it will be 
 seen that, although the property in the last case was vested 
 in George Moran, it is now sold by John Moran, and 
 it will of course be necessary to see how the latter has ac- 
 quired his title. Assume that there is a recital in the deed 
 that John Moran is the eldest son and heir of Elizabeth 
 Moran, a sister of, and sole surviving heiress of, the George 
 Moran. Prior to the V. & P. Act this recital, being within 
 
 ' Re Linct, 3 Chy. Cha. 230. 
 
 ' Wishart v. Cook, 15 Chy. 237. 
 
 3 Taylor on Titles, Chap. Particular Titles. Wills. 
 
 * Davis V. Van Norman, 30 U. C. Q. B.437. 
 
 s Whicker v. Hume, 6 W. R. 813. 
 
TITLE TO REAL ESTATE — PARTICULAR TITLES. 
 
 39 
 
 the last thirty or forty years, could not be accepted as suffi- 
 cient evidence of the truth of these matters. The matters 
 are of the highest importance, and even if the recitals were 
 upwards of thirty years old, they would not, it seems, prior 
 to the Act referred to, be sufficient.* Now, however, they 
 may be taken as conclusive. It would formerly be neces- 
 sary to set about proving the pedigree of George Moran, 
 and then, if the recitals were found to be corroborated by 
 facts — by the possession of the land, and by all ^.he circum- 
 stances of the case — the sufficiency of the conveyance may 
 be arrived at. The same proofs are required by a convey- 
 ancer that would be necessary to establish a plaintiff's title 
 in an action of ejectment at nisi prius. First, it would be 
 required to prove that George Moran, the last owner on 
 paper, died without issue, without having made a will, or a 
 will disposing of this property. For this purpose, if letters 
 of administration were issued to his effects in the Surrogate 
 Court, that would be satisfactory. A genealogical tree 
 should then be made out tracing the line back to George's 
 lather, who would inherit in certain contingencies, but it 
 would not be necessary to go beyond him. In the present 
 case, the marriage of George's father would have to be 
 established by certificate, and then the number of brothers 
 and sisters of George himself shewn ; afterwards, the death 
 of George without having made a will, and the fact that he 
 left no children nor the child of any deceased child, and 
 strictly, that if he had any children, none of them made a 
 will disposing of the property in question. Where the title 
 passes through any child from its father, then the legiti- 
 macy of the child must be established by baptismal entries 
 within a reasonable period after the marriage. All the 
 brothers and sisters of George other than Elizabeth must 
 be proved to be dead without issue, and the entire number 
 of the family must be proved. If of age, then it must be 
 proved that they died intestate, but a certificate of baptism 
 is not sufficient evidence of the exact age of a party, though 
 it is good evidence of his legitimacy. 
 
 2 
 
 c 
 
 
 » Taylor on Titles, page 137. 
 
40 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 I" 
 
 blip 
 Ill 
 
 ,;L.iii I 
 
 jriiiinl 
 
 It frequently happens that, in making a title by inheri- 
 tance, the solicitor will have no material except voluntary 
 affidavits or declarations, and these are of course no legal 
 evidence, though they may carry sufficient weight to pass 
 the title. Unless he can do this from affidavits or from 
 presumptions of law, then he may be driven to the desperate 
 resort of attempting to quiet the title under the Act for 
 that purpose. In the latter event, if all the parties live in 
 this country, and never went out of it, then it may be pos- 
 sible in some cases to get a simple title quieted in the 
 course of a couple of years. But in a case of this kind, 
 where secondary evidence would have to be resorted to, it 
 may be worth consulting counsel, whether it will not be 
 advisable to obtain title by length of possession. 
 
 4. Decree, In tracing title through a decree in the 
 Court of Chancery,' the assurance that everything is cor- 
 rect is no more than in the case of an ordinary vendor. 
 The court does not warrant the title, though it will uphold 
 a sale conformable to the decree in a suit in which the 
 proper parties are before the court and in which there was 
 no fraud in obtaining the decree. 
 
 5. Power of Sale. The title having been traced from 
 Wells to Moore, and the latter having given a mortgage 
 back, we find the mortgagee. Wells, selling to A. Wright. 
 The mortgage in this case should be looked into to see if 
 Moore was entitled to notice before sale, and then to see if 
 he got the proper notice. Wells may, under the terms of the 
 power, be restricted to sell by public auction only ; but it 
 will be always necessary to see that the mortgagee, in ex- 
 ercising his power, kept strictly within its terms. 
 
 6. Vesting Order! The next registration shews that 
 the property got into the Court of Chancery again. Vest- 
 ing orders are frequently made in partition suits when a 
 number of heirs would be necessary to convey, some of 
 them infants perhaps, and others out of the country. It 
 
 ■ Or now in the High Court of Justice. 
 
TITLE TO REAL ESTATE — PARTICULAR TITLES. 
 
 41 
 
 must be proved that the parties entitled were alive when 
 the vesting order was made. This conveyance operates as 
 an assurance, but the purchaser has no covenants from the 
 heirs though he is entitled to such covenants, and probably 
 he cannot be forced to take a vesting order instead of a 
 deed of grant with the usual covenants.' 
 
 A vesting order is proof enough of the plaintiff's title ;' 
 but it must be shewn that all the parties to be affected can 
 be bound,* and that they are alive, but they may be 
 minors or lunatics, and that the decree is absolute,* and 
 that the vesting order vests all interests, legal and equitable, 
 in the plaintiff.* 
 
 7. Lis pendens. The next registration shews that a 
 suit is being brought against Walker. This is got rid of 
 by a certificate of the dismissal of the suit or action, and 
 it is only necessary to look for the latter just as discharges 
 of mortgages are sought for. Unless a certificate of dis- 
 missal appears, then there should be a decree registered, 
 giving title in some other way. The policy of the Courts 
 is not to allow a lis pendens on the files, as it ties up the 
 property, and does not die out by lapse of time, as it well 
 might, unless renewed. 
 
 8. Mechanics' Liens. A mechanic's lien of itself has 
 no validity after ninety days, unless a suit is entered to keep it 
 alive, and some substantial indebtedness is necessary to be 
 proved before it will be registered. A suit, however, in 
 which a lis pendens may be filed, only requires assertion, 
 and sometimes has never anything else. 
 
 Both these form serious objections, and must be removed 
 before the title can be passed. 
 
 9. Insolvency. In a sale by an official assignee under 
 any Insolvency Act, the terms of the xict must of com-se be 
 
 ' Slater V. Fisken, i Chy. Cha. i. 
 
 » Re Gordon & McPhail, 32 Q. B. 480. 
 
 3 Slater v. Fisken, i Chy. Cha. i. 
 
 < Clariss v. EUiss, 6 P. R. 115. 
 
 5 Re Robertson &> Robertson, 22 Chy. 449. 
 
 I 
 
 ■ I 
 
 S 
 
42 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINQ, 
 
 corresponded with, though it may not be necessary to prove 
 the actual Insolvency. The necessary resohitions for a 
 sale — cii bloc or otherwise — the advertisements and other 
 usual preliminaries are essential. 
 
 i«Mh||i- 
 
 Imi, 
 
 10. Tax Title. In a tax title, a number of points fol- 
 lowing the Act are set out in detail by Mr. Taylor in his 
 Treatise on Titles. The treasurer's return and the assess- 
 ment are necessary data — then the warrant to sell — the 
 distress made of the chattels — the requisite advertisement 
 — the description of the lands — and the sale — are all 
 matters to be looked into with a view to see if the former 
 owner is cut out — then the time for redemption, the non- 
 receipt of any payments, and lastly the deed to the new 
 purchaser and its registration within the period of eighteen 
 months after the sale. 
 
 Proof of taxes in arrear may be made in various ways, 
 the simplest being the treasurer's warrant.* It is necessary 
 to shew there was no sufficient distress on the premises ;* 
 that the warrant have a seal f that they have been pro- 
 perly advertised' — but where two years had elapsed after 
 the execution of the tax-deed, without its being questioned, 
 no evidence of a due advertising is necessary* — and the 
 sale properly conducted," and no intimidation or undue 
 influence,' and sold for the proper amount of taxes.' It 
 must be shewn that there was an actual sale, and that 
 some taxes were due," and the production of the treasurer's 
 warrant is now held sufficient evidence of taxes in arrear 
 for the time mentioned." The lands may be described as 
 
 ' Hall V. Hill, 22 Q. B. 578. 
 
 * Dobbic V. Titlly, 10 C. P. 432. 
 
 ^ Morgan v. Qiicsitel, 26 Q. B. 539. 
 
 * Cotter V. Sutherland, 18 C. P. 357. 
 5 Wapels V. Ball, 29 C. P. 403. 
 
 * Logie V. Young, 10 Chy. 217. 
 
 7 Schofield V. Dickinson, 10 Chy. 226. 
 
 * Allan V. Fisher, 13 C. P. 63. 
 
 9 Proudfoot V. Austin, 21 Chy. 566. 
 •" Clark V. Buchanan, 25 Chy. 559. 
 
TITLE TO REAL ESTATE — OTHER ENCUMBRANCES. 
 
 43 
 
 all patented,' or all deeded.* Under each of these heads a 
 multitude of cases will be found in the reports, and any 
 satisfactory epitome could not be made of them here. 
 
 The warden and treasurer are the proper conveying 
 parties in a tax deed.' 
 
 VII. OTHER ENCUMBRANCES. 
 
 1. Liens. In deeds executed since the 18th September, 
 1865, there is no lien on the land for unpaid purchase 
 money. Before that date the unpaid purchase money 
 formed a lien, and the absence of a receipt was held con- 
 structive notice that the purchase money was not paid.^ 
 
 Under our Revised Statutes, cap. 95, all lasting improve- 
 ments made under a mistake of title by a person believing 
 the land to be his own, entitle him or his assigns to a lien on 
 the same to the extent of the value of the land enhanced 
 by such improvements, or the Court may direct him, on 
 keeping the land, to make such compensation as may be 
 just. 
 
 2, Bonds. As to Crown Bonds there are none to affect 
 lands since 1866, but it may be remembered that the statute'' 
 passed in 1873, intends only to deal with bonds relating to 
 matters within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Government, 
 and it does not release any land charged by such bonds 
 before the 1st of January of that year. Bonds made to 
 secure Crown debts within the jurisdiction of the Dominion 
 Government, may still affect lands, and be registered in the 
 Court of Queen's Bench at Toronto. It is not usual since 
 1873 to search for Crown Bonds. All Division Court Bonds 
 made before 1st July, 1869, are effectually released as to 
 liabilities incurred thereunder, both before and since that 
 date.* 
 
 ' Brooke v. Campbell, 12 Chy. 526. 
 
 " Cook V. yones, 17 Chy. 488. 
 
 3 Ferguson v. Freeman, 27 Chy. 211. 
 
 * Baldwin v. Dtiignan, 6 Gr. 595. 
 
 5 36 Vic. cap. 6, and see R. S. O. cap. 93. 
 
 ♦ Re Franklin, 8 P. R. 470. 
 
 I 
 
 ' '2 
 
44 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 3. Writs, The important search, after the Registry 
 Office, is in the office of the Sheriff, in order to see if any writa 
 are in his hands against the lands in question. The writ, it 
 maybe remarked, is not directed against the lands in so many 
 words, but against the owner, and binds all the owner's 
 lands within the sheriff 's county. The certificate from the 
 sheriff should show that there are no writs now in his 
 hands, and that there have been none for thirty days past, 
 and no sale under the writs within the last six months. 
 Lands are bound only from the delivery of the writ against 
 them to the sheriff, and a judgment is no lien upon them.' 
 
 4. Arrears of Taxes. The searches as to taxes in 
 arrears, for special improvements, etc., must not be omitted. 
 The search for arrears of taxes is made with County Trea- 
 surer or City Chamberlain. The local rates can be found 
 only by looking into the municipal by-laws. 
 
 TITLE TO PERSONAL PROPERTY. 
 
 L PEELIMINARY. 
 
 ...iiiii'i 
 
 
 ■WOVil 
 
 Of title to such personal property as becomes the 
 subject of Bills of Sale or Chattel Mortgages, very 
 little can be said. There is none of that absolute cer- 
 tainty about the title to a chattel that pertains to realty, 
 and it must be understood so by a client risking his money 
 thereon ; indeed, it ver}^ generally is so understood. Where 
 the reputed owner of chattele is possessed of real estate, 
 upon which the chattels in question are always to be found, 
 there is little risk, chiefly because no man with any stake 
 in the country in real estate can suddenly vanish from his 
 creditors. As is said in another chapter, the personal 
 chattels or personal estate very fairly represent the personal 
 
 ■ Doc d. Auldjo V. Hallister, 5 O. S, 739; Doe d. Burnham v. Simmons, 7 
 Q. B. 196. 
 
TITLK TO PERSONAL PROPERTY — PRELIMINARY. 
 
 ['O 
 
 covenant, and unless for the pur|>oses of priority and expe- 
 diency, a chattel mortgage is not much more valuahle 
 security than a note. Chattel mortgages are of course very 
 generally taken as security from customers for dehts and 
 future advances, but they are not often taken as security 
 for loans by those whose business it is to lend money. 
 
 The title to goods and chattels does not rest upon title 
 deeds, nor in general upon documentary evidence, but it is 
 founded prima facie upon visible possession and apparent 
 ownership.' It would be impossible from the nature of the 
 articles that a permanent record could be kept of them, 
 and so no effort is made to register goods and chattels to 
 the same extent as is done with real estate. When a sale 
 of land is made, the transfer is always registered, but with 
 a sale of chattels the registry is made only where there is 
 no change of possession, and in all other cases of the transfer 
 of chattels no deed or transfer at Common Law was ever 
 made out, and of course no record of it kept. By the Com- 
 mon Law, the right of property in, and title to, goods and 
 chattels may be transferred to a purchaser by a contract of 
 sale without any delivery of the goods or payment of the 
 price, so that after the bargain has been concluded the 
 goods may become the property of the buyer, although they 
 still remain in the possession of the vendor. 
 
 By the Act respecting mortgages and sales of personal 
 property,^ every sale of goods and chattels not accompanied 
 by an immediate delivery, and followed by . n actual and 
 .nucd change of possession of the goods and chattels 
 shall be in writing by a conveyance under the Act, 
 }i it must appear by affidavit that the sale is bona fide, 
 and for good consideration, and not done to enable the pur- 
 chaser to hold the goods and chattels so as to defraud the 
 vendor's en 'itors. In order to give publicity to such trans- 
 fers, the CO eyance and affidavits must be registered in 
 the office . lie Clerk of the County Court within live days 
 after the t ution thereof. 
 
 S 
 
 9 
 
 I 
 
 a5 
 
 • Hiern v. Mills, 13 Ves. 122. 
 ' R. S, O. cap. 119, sec. 5. 
 
46 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 The Act does not apply to registered vessels. 
 
 In cases not within the Revised Statute referred to, the 
 general law is that the property in personal chattels may 
 be transferred by actual delivery by deed or by a contract 
 for sale,' but that a gift must be by delivery or by deed. 
 Any other sort of gift is void;'' but these questions and 
 the provisions of the 17th sec. of the Statute of Frauds do 
 not come within the scope of this treatise. 
 
 The possession of goods is only irrima facie evidence of 
 title to them — they may have been stolen, or the possessor 
 may be only caretaker or custodian. In any of these cases 
 the reputed owner could convey no undefeasible title against 
 the true owner, although he may be entitled to hold them 
 against all others. In case he be found to be owner in the 
 County Court office, this may be taken at least as evidence 
 that some one else believed him to be the true owner. 
 
 The difficulty with personal property is that it has no 
 sittm — it generally follows the domicile of the ov\-ner.' 
 
 I 
 
 
 II. SEARCHES. 
 
 1. County Court Office. A search should always 
 be made in the office of the County Court in the county 
 wherein the goods and chattels now are, or were recently, 
 and of course if they are mortgaged, the mortgage should 
 be discharged. 
 
 2. "Writs. Searches should ako be made in the proper 
 offices of the Sheriff, and of the Division Court bailiffs. 
 
 3. Rent in Arrear. In case the owner is lessee of any 
 premises, a receipt should be obtained from the landlord 
 that there is no rent in arrear, and where the tenant does 
 not pay punctually, an undertaking should be got from the 
 landlord, that he is not to allow the rent to run in arrear 
 beyond one payment, or that if he do so, the goods and 
 
 ■ Prideaux Con. 727. 
 
 * Sharrw Pilch, 19 L. J. (Ex.) 113. 
 
 ' See Parkhnrst v. Roy, 27 Chy. 361, now in Appeal. 
 
TITLE TO PERSONAL PROPERTY — SEARCHES. 
 
 47 
 
 chattels shall be liable for the rent to the extent only of one 
 payment in priority to the purchaser or mortgagee. 
 
 4. Liens. Enquiry might also be made whether any of 
 the goods is the possessor's conditionally, as these, if 
 valuable, would lessen the security. 
 
 Note. — If the case of The Trust and Loan Company v. Lawrason be 
 reversed in the Supreme Court of Canada, distress clauses in mortgages 
 of real estate may require to be considered. The point in this case is, 
 shortly, whether in a mortgage of real estate under the Act respecting short 
 forms of mortgages, with a clause for distress for arrears of interest, and 
 an additional agreement on the part of the mortgagor that he " doth attorn 
 and become tenant at will to the Company [the mortgagees], subject to the 
 said proviso," the mortgagees are entitled to the position of landlord to- 
 wards the mortgagor. If such be held ultimately to be the law then it is 
 clear that a mortgage on the land may be as great an obstacle as if the owner of 
 the chattels thereon was a mere tenant, and that this would have to be con- 
 sidered in searching the title where any considerable amount was at stake. 
 As put by Mr. Justice Cameron in his judgment in the Court of Queen's 
 Bench in th's t^ase, and by Patterson and Burton, Justices in the Court of 
 Appeal, it looks as a fraud upon the Chattel Mortgage Act. The mort- 
 gage on the land would become a mortgage on the chattels, and yet require 
 no registration. It will be a subject for the Legislature to consider 
 whether such should be the law, or whether any agreement in a mortgage 
 of land should secure to the mortgagee the extraordinary privileges of a 
 landlord to the detriment of intervening judgment creditors of mortgagees 
 of the chattels. 
 
 On the other hand, the mortgagee of the land may claim the personal 
 chattels of his mortgagor as the recognized security for his interest. It is 
 very questionable however, if he has a better right to them than a creditor 
 whose claim accrues before his own. If it should so be decided, then the 
 Legislature should compel a mortgagee of lands who proposes to look to 
 the chattels of his mortgagor for arrears of interest, to give notice to that 
 effect in the office where a chattel mortgage of such goods would be 
 registered before he could distrain for them, and also that in no case should 
 he have priority for more than one instalment of interest. 
 
 There seems to be no question, but that the two relations of tenant and 
 mortgagor can be created by the one instrument. 
 
 See the elaborate judgment of Mr. Justice Cameron, in Laing v. Ontario 
 Loan and Savings Company, 46 Q. B. 120, referred to post. 
 
 i 
 
 c 
 
 I 
 III 
 
 ': 
 
CHAPTER III. 
 
 AGREEMENTS. 
 
 1 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 II. Void Contracts : 
 
 1. Immoral Consideration. 
 
 2. Contrary to Statute Law. 
 
 3. Contrary to Public Policy. 
 
 III. Voidable Contracts : 
 
 1. Infants, etc. 
 
 2. Mistake. 
 
 3. Failure of Consideration. 
 
 IV. Consideration. 
 
 V. Authentication of Con- 
 tracts : 
 I. Contracts requiring a Seal. 
 
 2. Written Contracts not re- 
 
 quiring a Seal. 
 
 3. Statutory Requisites. 
 VI. Plan of Agreement. 
 
 VII. Summary. 
 VIII. Conditions of Sale. 
 
 IX. Subsequent Matters : 
 
 1. Discharge. 
 
 2. Transfer. 
 
 3. Merger. 
 
 r:::- 
 
 ;ir.'iiiii:,|i 
 
 I. PRELIMINARY. 
 
 An agreement which is to be the basis of a subsequent 
 conveyance is a document not to be executed without due 
 consideration beforehand. Such a document is one highly 
 important, and at the same time necessarily dangerous. 
 For if it be worth anything at all, it is binding on the 
 parties to the extent of its meaning, and parties the most 
 relaxing before signing an agreement, may turn out to be 
 most inflexible thereafter. Each party fancies he has con- 
 ceded to his enemy all that he ought, and each is prepared 
 to resent further concession. It is then that each word in 
 the document is strained to the full tension of its legal and 
 grammatical signification — each clause is weighed with 
 judicial carefulness, if not with judicial fairness. Should 
 a weak spot be detected in one side, it becomes formidable 
 
AGREEMENTS — PRELIMINARY. 
 
 49 
 
 for the other, and then the question speedily is asked, 
 if the agreement can be specifically enforced in a Court of 
 Justice. If not, either the agreement is altered, or the 
 transaction falls through. 
 
 Even with the most skilful conveyancers an omission 
 may occasionally take place, because, although a large part 
 of the duty of a soHcitor in drawing an agreement is ask- 
 ing for minuter particulars, yet it may happen that both 
 parties to it may omit or disregard an item of importance. 
 
 In England, perhaps nine out of every ten sales of land 
 are preceded by an agreement, having such sale :n view ; 
 and in a country where the transfer was and is so elaborate 
 and expensive, it is to be expected that no deed of land 
 should be given until the particulars of the sale were drawn 
 up and assented to by all the parties. A transfer there is 
 a matter of months ; and there being only a few register 
 counties, the title is not easily reached, as with us. A 
 number of circumstances justify the use of agreements 
 there that do not apply here, where there are comparatively 
 few of them. If the parties are satisfied with the title, the 
 deed of grant from the vendor to the purchaser can be drawn 
 up in a shorter time than an agreement for that purpose, 
 and the solicitor can hold the instruments till he has 
 satisfied himself of any executions or taxes against the 
 property. This, though a loose and undesirable way, is, 
 perhaps, the way in which the great majority of sales are 
 effected in this Province. 
 
 Where an agreement is contemplated, then, it must not 
 be forgotten that it is the important.part of the transaction, 
 being the foundation of the edifice of which the assurance 
 is the completion.' It is, at all events, as important as 
 any subsequent assurance prepared under it, as it is the 
 basis of all future operations ; and when it is signed it can- 
 not be departed from without the consent of all parties — 
 a consent that can seldom be obtained, and, in some cases, 
 may not be sufficient.* 
 
 cs 
 C 
 
 \ 
 
 9 
 
 S 
 
 Deane Conveyancing, 300. 
 Greenwood Con. i. 
 
 o's.c. 
 
 4 
 
50 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 »>' ,, 
 
 C.:ii. 
 
 II. VOID CONTRACTS. 
 
 Contracts which the law will not permit, under any cir- 
 cumstances, may be referred to three classes. 
 
 1. Immoral Consideration. Contracts founded on 
 an illegal, and therefore, a void consideration — as an im- 
 moral act, or futm-e illicit cohabitation ; or where the con- 
 tract, either directly or indirectly promotes immorality. 
 
 2. Contrary to the Statute Law. Any contract 
 tontrary to the provisions of the statute law is void. 
 
 To this may be referred the case of a statute imposing a 
 penalty and the contract to be in contravention of it ; the 
 sale of offices ; simoniacal contracts, if such there be in this 
 country ; contracts to procure smuggling ; carrying on busi- 
 ness without license, or as in the case of unlicensed jpracti- 
 tioners ; contracts regarding the sale or purchase of land 
 on a Sunday, or for any dealing within a man's calling or 
 occupation on that day; and generally any contract in 
 violation of the law, or in contravention of an Act of the Local 
 Legislature or the Dominion Parliament. 
 
 3. Contrary to Public Policy. The third class of void 
 contracts refers to such contracts as are contrary to Public 
 Policy. 
 
 To this class may be referred a contract in restraint 
 of marriage generally ; a general restraint of trade ; main- 
 tenance and champerty ; contracts with alien enemies, and 
 any contracts which obstruct justice or interfere with the 
 public administration of affairs. 
 
 It may be said that a contract preventing a marriage with 
 any particular person may be entered into ; and that a con- 
 tract for the partial restraint of trade or business, if founded 
 on a valuable consideration, may be upheld. 
 
 An illegal consideration avoids a contract. But where 
 there are several considerations for separate and distinct 
 contracts, even if one of the considerations is bad, the re- 
 maining ones can stand ; but if there is one entire con- 
 
AGREEMENTS — VOIDABLE CONTRACTS. 
 
 51 
 
 th 
 li- 
 ed 
 
 sideration for two several agreements, and one of these is 
 for the performance of an illegal act, the whole is bad. 
 
 One illegal covenant may be struck out of a contract, and 
 the others stand, where there are separate and independent 
 covenants. 
 
 III. VOIDABLE CONTRACTS. 
 
 1. Infants, Fraud, etc. As to voidable contracts,very 
 little need be said, after the remarks made in the Intro- 
 ductory chapter. A false representation is a sufficient 
 ground to have a contract rescinded, but it must be made 
 with intent to deceive ; an innocent representation, even if 
 untrue, is no ground of relief. 
 
 Fraud does not make a contract void : it is voidable at 
 the option of the party defrauded — the guilty party cannot 
 take advantage of his own wrong so as to avoid the con- 
 tract. 
 
 Sales to expectant heirs are viewed the same way here as 
 in England, so as to protect these parties from designing 
 men'; and a sale at an undervalue to a person under whose 
 influence the grantor is, is as objectionable as a gift under 
 the like circumstances.' Unless undue advantage was taken 
 of a drunken man, so as to get it at an undervalue, the sale 
 holds good*; and to avoid a sale for value by a lunatic, it 
 may be necessary to establish that the purchaser was aware 
 of the seller's mental condition.* 
 
 2. Mistakes. As to mistakes in agreements, two lead- 
 ing cases will guide us to the law in their regard. In Lans- 
 downe v. Lansdowne/' it was decided that no relief would 
 be given in a mistake of law, except where the mistake is 
 one of title arising from ignorance of a principle of law of 
 such constant occurrence as to be supposed to be under- 
 
 I 
 
 F -' 
 
 v 
 
 
 
 5 
 
 :e- 
 In- 
 
 ■ Moray v. Tottcii, 6 Chy. 176. 
 
 - Mason v. Scney, 12 Chy. 143. 
 
 ^ Clarkson v. Kit son, 4 Chy. 244. 
 
 * Macdonald v. Macdonald, 14 Chy. 545. 
 
 s 2 Jacob & Walker, 205 
 
62 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 i««i> I. 
 
 „3ll:'iiM 
 
 ill :it 
 
 stood by the community at large. The whole law on the 
 subject is laid down at great length in the other leading case 
 of the Earl Beaiichamp v. Winn.^ It was decided in this 
 case : — 
 
 1. Where, in the making of an agreement between two 
 parties there has been a mutual mistake as to their rights, 
 occasioning an inquiry to one of them, the rule of equity 
 is in favour of interposing to grant relief. 
 
 2. Although the parties have, subsequently to the agree- 
 ment, dealt with the property, or other circumstances have 
 intervened so that it may be difficult to restore them to their 
 original position, the court will not, if a ground of relief is 
 established, decline to grant such relief. 
 
 3. The rule ignorantia Legis non excusat though applying 
 where the alleged ignorance is that of a well known rule of 
 law, does not so apply where the mistake is of a matter of law 
 arising upon the doubtful construction of a grant. 
 
 4. Acquiescence in what has been done will not be a bar 
 to relief, where the party alleged to have acquiesced has 
 acted or abstained from acting through being ignorant that 
 he possessed rights which would be available against that 
 which he permitted to be enjoyed. 
 
 3. Failure of Consideration. A contract may be 
 avoided if there is a total failure of consideration ; and if 
 the thing purchased does not answer the description, the 
 purchaser is not bound to take it, and may recover his 
 money back.* But if he got what he bargained for, though 
 it may be of no value, he is bound by it.* 
 
 IV. CONSIDERATION. 
 
 Every agreement may be said to require a consideration 
 to support it ; but agreements under seal, with one or two 
 exceptions, are presumed, from the fact of the solemnities 
 
 • L. R. 6 E. & I. App. 223. 
 
 " Azema v. Casella, L. R. 2 C. P. 678. 
 
 3 Lamert v. Heath, 15 M. & W. 488. 
 
 
AGREEMENTS — CONSIDERATION. 
 
 58 
 
 with which they are executed, to have been founded on a 
 sufficient consideration ; and, so far as the parties to the 
 deed are concerned, nothing, ordinarily, will be heard to the 
 contrary. 
 
 A contract not under seal — a simple contract — requires 
 what is known to the law as a valuable consideration. There 
 is another sort of consideration arising from motives of 
 generosity, prudence, and natural duty, which is called a 
 fjood consideration, such as blood relationship, or natui*al 
 love and affection. A valuable consideration is founded on 
 motives of justice, and may be money or money's worth, 
 marriage, etc. A simple contract cannot be supported on 
 a good consideration. 
 
 A good consideration is, however, sufficient in a deed as 
 between the parties, but not as against a subsequent pur- 
 chaser ; and except in a bargain and sale, which requires a 
 j)ecuniary consideration and a covenant to stand seized, 
 which requires a good consideration, a gift implying no 
 consideration is valid as between the parties, if made by 
 deed. 
 
 What may be a valuable consideration is not always easy 
 to define. A verbal gratuitous promise is not sufficient, nor 
 is it sufficient that the person do something he was other- 
 wise legally obliged to do. It is any benefit or advantage 
 on one side, or any trouble, injury or inconvenience sus- 
 tained on the other, even if there be no benefit to the oppo- 
 site party ; and either may be done to or for a third person 
 at the request of the party promising. If the plaintift' part 
 with anything that is of value to himself, though it may be 
 of no legal value in the defendant's hands, to obtain the 
 defendant's promise, that forms a valid consideration for the 
 purpose ;' the contract must be entered into for a consid- 
 eration moving to the debtor himself, and not to a third 
 party." 
 
 8) 
 
 c 
 
 I 
 
 ' Bradford v. O'Brien. 6 Q. B. 417. 
 » McLean v. Tinsley, 7 Q. B. 40. 
 
54 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 Every new contract requires a new or additional consid- 
 eration, and bygone acts or services will not be sufficient 
 unless done pursuant to a previous request. 
 
 
 ii 
 
 ■wmU 
 
 V. AUTHENTICATION OF CONTRACTS. 
 
 1. Contracts Bequiring a Seal, Some contracts 
 require to be in writing, and some few require to be a writing 
 under seal. All other contracts can be made by word of 
 mouth. 
 
 Documents requiring a sealed instrument are : — 
 
 (a) Gifts, and all unilateral engagements. 
 
 {h) The conveyance of incorporeal hereditaments. 
 
 (c) All interests in land which the Statute of Frauds 
 or R. S. 0. cap. 98, require to be in writing. 
 
 (d) Authority of an agent who has to execute a sealed 
 instrument. 
 
 (e) Contracts with Corporations, except where the con- 
 tract is executed, and for trivinl transitctions, and generally 
 the rule does not apply to trading corporations. 
 
 In regard to the first of these classes, it may be said that 
 a deed is not required where the gift is capable of delivery, 
 and where actual delivery has been made. But if there 
 is no delivery, a gift must be by deed. A mere writing is 
 not sufficient. 
 
 The conveyance of incorporeal hereditaments always lay 
 in grant, and the grant must be by deed. 
 
 Of these are rights of common, rights of way, rents, an- 
 nuities, and profits issuing out of land. 
 
 Licenses of pleasure, such as the right to shoot or fish 
 on the property of another, or of profit, such as entering 
 upon land to remove fixtures, must be by deed in order to 
 be irrevocable. But licenses of profit may be good by a 
 writir:g not under seal, if founded on a valuable considera- 
 tion, at least they may give a right of action if the privilege 
 is withdrawn. The licensed party under a parol license of 
 profit has no rights against an assignee of the land ; nor 
 
 
AGREEMENTS — AUTHENTICATION OF CONTRACTS. 
 
 65 
 
 has a mere licensee of pleasure, whose contract is only a 
 personal one.' An easement can only be effectually granted, 
 as has been seen, by a deed. 
 
 Reservations and exceptions, as of easements, rents, or 
 services, arise only in deeds of grant. A reservation must 
 issue out of the thing granted — an exception must be part 
 of it. 
 
 An incorporeal hereditament in the nature of a profit 
 a prendre, such as would descend to the heir, is assignable 
 by deed in any way that the land might be : such as a right 
 to dig and carry away ore, stone, clay or minerals. The 
 term incorporeal hereditments includes such as rents, es- 
 tovers common, and all other profits granted out of land." 
 
 All interests in land as set out in the 4th sec. of the 
 Statute of Frauds as requiring a writing must by our 
 Provincial Statute be by deed. 
 
 It is a well known principle in law that an agent who is 
 to execute a sealed instrument on behalf of his principal 
 must be empowered by an instrument under seal. 
 
 Agreements entered into by corporate bodies will be re- 
 ferred to elsewhere in various parts of this work. 
 
 Other documents may require to be under seal by virtue 
 of particular statutes, and of course almost any contract 
 may be made by deed, so as to get the benefit of the doc- 
 trine of estoppel in regard to consideration, in order to bind 
 the representatives of a covenantor, etc., etc' 
 
 2. "WrittBii Contracts not Requiring a Seal, 
 (rt) Agreements for the sale of any interest in land under 
 the 4th section of the Statute of Frauds. 
 
 (6) Sales of personal property where there is no change 
 of possession. 
 
 (c) Mortgages of personal property. 
 
 I 
 
 C 
 
 I 
 
 ' See Addison on Contracts, 113-115. 
 
 An easement privilege or license, which is personal, cannot be assigned 
 unless it is annexed or appurtenant to a tenement. Licenses of ferry are 
 issued by the Lieutenant-Governor of the Province. R. S. O. Cap. 172. 
 
 =■ Co. Litt. 20 a. 
 
 ' Assignments of Patents, of ships, etc., must be by deed. 
 
66 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 ((/) Ratification of contracts by minors. 
 (c) Wills of real or personal property. 
 
 Contracts within the 17th section of the Statute of Frauds 
 do not come within the scope of this work. 
 
 The Act relating to mortgages and sales of personal 
 property is intended for the protection of creditors and 
 subsequent purchasers of the vendor. 
 
 Only matters immediately affecting the subject of con- 
 veyancing are considered here. 
 
 Any of the documents referred to as requiring to be made 
 under seal, of course must be in writing ; but there are a 
 great variety of agreements and contracts which require to 
 be in writing without being necessarily by deed. It is 
 only in the department of conveyancing in our law as 
 affecting an interest in lands, that a mere writing is re- 
 quired, and is sufficient for the inception of an agreement, 
 and a formal sealed instrument is necessary for the com- 
 pletion of the purchaser's title. The written agreement 
 conveyed the estate in Equity — the assurance under seal 
 perfected the title in a Court of Law. As all the Divisions 
 of our High Court of Justice in Ontario are now Equity 
 Courts, it will remain to be seen how long the old distinc- 
 tions are to last — to what extent one may expect to see a 
 sealed instrument preponderate in intrinsic efficacy over an 
 unsealed one. If our courts are to regard as done what 
 ought to have been done, it may be within the region of 
 possibility, that a plaintiff in ejectment may recover at 7iisi 
 prius on a paper title without a sealed assurance to support 
 it. The law, however, yet is that a purchaser must obtain 
 his legal title, and the change made by the Judicature Act 
 of 1881 is that he can get it in any of the Divisional Courts 
 of the High Court of Justice. The phrase in equity seems 
 to have lost its relative signification. 
 
 No transfer of any interest in land requires to be made 
 by agreement as well as by assurance under seal. The 
 latter is all that is necessary, though one may follow the 
 other in the usual order. 
 
 
AGREEMENTS — AUTHENTICATION OF CONTRACTS. 
 
 57 
 
 Unless there are such dealings between the parties, as 
 the law regards sufficient part performance, the agreement 
 must be in writing. 
 
 A sale of property under the direction of the High Court 
 of Justice is not within the Statute.' 
 
 3. Statutory Bequisite3, By the 4th section of the 
 Statute of Frauds," no action shall be brought to charge 
 any person upon any contract or sale of lands, tenements, 
 or hereditaments, or any interest in or concerning them, 
 unless the agreement upon which such action shall be 
 brought, or some memorandum or note thereof shall be in 
 writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewith, 
 or some other person thereunto by him lawfully authorized. 
 
 Every agreement which is substantially one for the sale 
 of an interest in land must therefore be in writing, and the 
 whole agreement must be in writing. 
 
 What is an interest in land ? 
 
 Where the vendor is the legal or equitable owner of 
 the land he proposes to sell, or where he has any share 
 in the ownership of it, there is not much difficulty in 
 answering this question, but where he has only a condi- 
 tional title or a right in or over the land, it may not be so 
 easy to decide. Where land is pledged by a bond for the 
 payment of a debt, or where it is mortgaged, it has been 
 held that the interest of the creditor is within the statute.* 
 It follows from this that an agreement to assign a mort- 
 gage must be in writing. And it may be stated generally 
 that wherever the conferring of any interest in land by one 
 party is the consideration for the promise of the other, a 
 writing is necessary even although the party agreeing to 
 confer such interest may not at the time have been possessed 
 of any interest in the land.* The agreement does not refer 
 to any immediate transfer of an estate or interest in the 
 land, but operates as a contract to make or execute or grant 
 
 t 
 I 
 
 Pis'" 
 'I 
 
 
 
 I 
 
 ' Att'y-Cenl. v. Day, i Ves. 218. 
 ' 29 Car. ii, cap. 3. 
 3 Toppin V. Loiiias, 16 C. B. 145. 
 < Horsey v. Graham, L. R. 5 C. P. 9. 
 
58 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 sp,;;:; 
 
 *"'■ -nil 
 
 (•o 
 
 or transfer or conveyance at some subsequent period.' 
 Where anything in tlone which substantially amounts to a 
 sale or parting with an interest in land, the contract is 
 within the Statute." 
 
 Contracts for the letting and hiring of furnished houses 
 and lodgings by the day, week, or month, if they entitle 
 the party to any specific apartments, must be in writ- 
 ing ;' but a contract for board and lodging generally 
 is not within the Statute,* nor is any agreement which is 
 collateral to a sale of an interest in land as tenant's fixtures 
 to be taken at a valuation." Any collateral agreement may 
 easily be brought within the Statute if its terras are mixed 
 up with the sale of an interest on the land requiring a writ- 
 ing, or if the subject matter is accessorial to it. So agree- 
 ments to make alterations and repairs in buildings by an 
 intended lessee must be in writing if the principal subject- 
 matter of the agreement is the letting of the premises.' 
 Contracts for services in connection with the transfer of an 
 interest in land, such as the investigation of the title, do not 
 require to be in writing.' A contract for the sale of an ease- 
 ment must be in writing," as must the occupation of pre- 
 mises for pasturing purposes." 
 
 An assignment of a chattel interest in any land is void 
 at law, unless made by deed." The Rev. Stat., Chap. 98, 
 (sec. 1.) defines 'land' to mean, "messuages, lands, tene- 
 ments, and hereditments, whether corporeal or incorporeal, 
 and to any individual share thereof, and to any estate or 
 interest therein, and to money subject to be invested in 
 the purchase of land or any interest therein." It has been 
 held under the corresponding Act in England, that the 
 
 ■ Sug. Ven. 94 n. 
 
 ' Kelly V. Webster. i2 C. B. 290. 
 
 3 Edge V. Stra^ord, i C. & J. 391. 
 
 ♦ Wright V. Stavert, 2 Ell & Ell, 726. 
 5 Lee V. Gaskell, 1 Q. B. D. 700. 
 
 * Vaughan v. Hancock, 3 C. B. 7C6. 
 
 T y cakes V, White, 6 Ex. 873 ; and see cases in Addison on Contracts, 53. 
 
 " Chitty on Contracts, 283. 
 
 9 Smart v. Harding, 24 L. J. C. P. 76. 
 
 '° R. S. O., cap. 9S, sec. 4, 
 
AGREEMENTS — AUTHENTICATION OF CONTRACTH. 
 
 69 
 
 he 
 
 statute only refers to legal cstatoH, and ho an ('(luitalilc in- 
 terest, such as an equity of redemption, may bo assigned by 
 a note or memorandum in writing, without being under 
 seal.' A lease made by parol cannot, under the statute, l)o 
 assigned without a deed, but a lease l)y simple contract for 
 a term exceeding three years in duration, though void in 
 law as a lease, will operate as an assignment. Fixtures, 
 however, are neither goods or chattels within the meaning 
 of the Statute of Frauds, nor do they constitute an interest 
 in land though affixed to the freehold, and the same may 
 be said of railway shares and of the profits of a mine.' 
 
 All assignments of leasehold interests must bo in writing ; 
 but a lease if for three years or under, and for the full im- 
 proved rental, or two-thirds of it, may be by parol. 
 
 As to growing crops, it is now well settled in respect to 
 emblements ov friictus imlmtrudeH that a contract for tlio 
 Bale of them while growing, whether at maturity or not, or 
 whether taken off the ground by the buyer or seller, is not 
 a contract for an interest in land ; but that a contract for 
 the sale of a crop, which is the natural produce of the land, 
 if it be unripe at the time of the contract, and is to be taken 
 off the land by the buyer, is within the Statute.* 
 
 Having determined so far what is an interest in land, the 
 other requisites of the Statute will now be examined : 
 
 1. The names of the contracting parties as such.^ 
 
 2. The consideration. 
 
 3. The subject matter or object of the contract. 
 
 4. The signature of the party to be charged, or of his 
 agent lawfully authorized. 
 
 As to the first of these statutory requisites, tJiough the 
 cases go the length of deciding that the agreement must 
 
 I 
 
 6 w 
 
 ' Stammers v. Preston, g Jr. C. L. Repts. 355, C. V. An equity of re- 
 demption is more than a mere right or chattel interest, it is an estate in 
 land. — Deane Con. 240-241. 
 
 \ Per Parke Baron, 6 M. & W. 214; 3 Tyr. 959. See Knight v. Barber, 
 16 M. & W. 66. 
 
 1 Chitty on Contracts, 283; and see Marshall v. Green, 1 C. P. D. 35. 
 
 ♦ The memo, must specify the vendor by name or description. Cameron 
 V. Spiking, 25 Gr. iiG. /> 
 
60 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 {■"■■■• 
 lOl'Ml 
 
 contain vrlthin itself the means of ascertaining the essen- 
 tial parts of the contract, but do not make it necessary that 
 those parts should be i)recisely stated, still no one should 
 run any risk by not complying with the statute in as express 
 terms as it is possible. 
 
 In the case of Cummins v. Scott,^ referred to by Mr. 
 Justice Patterson in the more recent one of Bland v. Eaton,' 
 in our Court of Appeal, the authorities are gone into very 
 fully. 
 
 Sir George Jessel, M.E., says: — "In order that there 
 may be a contract, at least two things are necessary, 
 namely, contracting parties and subject matter of a con- 
 tract. No doubb other things are necessary, such as proper 
 words of contract, but at all even these two things must 
 be." 
 
 And Mr. Justice Patterson in the case referred to in our 
 own Court, says : — " These particulars [the subject matter, 
 tl^3 terms and the contracting parties] need not be expressly 
 stated totidem verbis. They may be deduced by reasonable 
 inference if the language permits it." 
 
 Though the entire document must be in writing, it is not 
 necessary that it should be contained in one writing but 
 the separate documents from which it is sought to extract 
 the agreement must have reference to each other and must 
 point to the same contract.' 
 
 When it is stated that the whole agreement must be in 
 writing it means that the real intention of the parties should 
 be fully incorporated therein ; for a defendant resisting the 
 specific performance of an agreement against him may show 
 h/ parol evidence that the written agreement does not re- 
 present the real intention of the parties to it, while the 
 plaintiff could not use such evidence.' 
 
 The consideration if agreed upon must be inserted. 
 
 ' L. R. 20 r"q. II. 
 
 - 6 Ont. App. 73. 
 
 » Bayh'y v. Fitziiuiiiricc, S E & B. G64, 
 
 * Woohan &• Hearii. 7 Ves. 211. 
 
AGREEMENTS AUTHENTICATION OF CONTRACTS. 
 
 61 
 
 The other statutory requisites are of course important ; 
 and if the solicitor acts for both parties he should sec that 
 both sign it. It is only necessary that the party to be 
 charged signs ; the party not signing may enforce the con- 
 tract by decree, though it may not be enforced against him. 
 
 The signature is not necessarily at the bottom of the in- 
 strument nor does it matter where it is so long as the docu- 
 ment is complete,' and initials* have been held sufficient 
 and a printed signature if ordinarily used satisfies the 
 requirements of the statute." 
 
 Where one James Crockford wrote a paper beginning : — 
 "I, James Crockford, agree to sell" it was held to be a suf- 
 ficient signature.* When the agreement contains the 
 names of the two contracting parties the subject matter of 
 the contract and the promise, it is binding on the party 
 signing it, although not signed by the other party.' Where 
 a person signed " as agent of the vendors " and on the back 
 oi the papers the vendors were identified to be the "ex- 
 ecutors of Admiral F. deceased " this was held sufficient." 
 But this case, like the one of a certain vendor, who standing 
 on his own farm agreed to sell " this place to B. at a fair 
 valuation," ' is not for imitation. 
 
 As to agent's signature it maybe said that an auctioneer 
 is the agent to sign for both parties, but if the vendor is his 
 own auctioneer then his signature will not bind the pur- 
 chaser. 
 
 The agent must be a third person. 
 
 Until the hammer goes down the auctioneer is exclusive- 
 ly the agent of the vendor,' and the moment the sale is over 
 the auctioneer is no longer the agent of either party," and 
 
 ' Hubert V. Trehcrne, 3 Man. & Or. 743. 
 
 - Philliinorc\. Barry, i Camp. 513. 
 
 ' Sanderson v. Jackson, 2 Bos. & P. 238. 
 
 * Knight V. Cruckjord, 1 Esp. igo. 
 
 ■^ Bank of B. N . A. v. Simpson, 24 C. P. 354. 
 
 ' Hood V. Barrington. L. K. Eq. 218 Deane Con. 303. 
 
 7 Waldron v. Jacob, Ir. Kep. 5 Eq. 131. 
 
 ^ Warlow V. Harrison, 29 L. J. Q. B. 14. 
 
 9 Mews V, Carr, 26 L. J. E.\. 39. 
 
 50 
 
 ml 
 
 CP 
 
 C 
 
 S 
 
 s 
 
 I 
 
 a 
 n 
 
 
 » 
 
 
 w 
 
 H 
 
62 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 he is not necessarily tbe agent of both parties for the sale 
 may be made by him and the vendor not under the conditions 
 of sale.' 
 
 |p<*..,.i 
 
 ■■^i mil 
 
 i 
 
 
 VI. PLAN OF AGREEMENT. 
 
 The statutory requisites referred to are essential to the 
 validity of an agreement unless in the case where a part 
 performance excuses the necessity of a written agreement 
 at all. 
 
 It may have all those, however, and not be a contract 
 effectuating the intention of the parties, and so the subject 
 matter or object of the contract must be prepared with great 
 care. Greenwood, in his work on Conveyancing, page 2, 
 says : 
 
 " In order to prepare an agreement properly the subject 
 matter of it should be previously arranged in the mind of 
 the draftsman, so that he may have a clear conception of 
 the object in view and the manner in which it is intended 
 to be carried out. * * * A precedent is seldom of much 
 assistance in preparing an agreement, except by enabling 
 the draftsman to form some idea of the manner in which it 
 should he framed ; the outline he may easily find, but the 
 filling up, which is manifestly the most important part of 
 the work, must be done by himself." 
 
 The same writer afterwards adds in reference to the in- 
 troduction of mere words — verbiage — in an agreement : 
 
 *' The proper way is never to introduce words in docu- 
 ments that have no meaning. A profusion of words 
 encumbers a document and answers no useful purpose. The 
 golden rule is, to express your meaning with clearness and 
 brevity, to insert all that should be inserted, and to leave 
 nothing to be inferred that ought to be expressed." (Con- 
 veyancing, page 4).- 
 
 After the usual preliminary clause, such as — " An agree- 
 ment made the 10th day of June, 1881, between John 
 
 ■ Bartlett v. Piiriull. 4 Ad. & E, 794. 
 
 » Thero is a conHict of precept and example in this passage. 
 
 
 1 
 
AGREEMENTS — PLAN OF AGREEMENT. 
 
 63 
 
 Smith, hereinafter called the vendor of the one part, aad 
 Peter Brown, vendee of the other part," there is the usual 
 clause : 
 
 1. That the said vendor (John Smith) agrees to sell, and 
 the said vendee (Peter Brown) agrees to purchase for 
 the sum of (^5000,) the fee simple in inheritance, and in 
 possession of, and in all the lands, and particularly iden- 
 tifying them. 
 
 So far, it will he seen that the Statute of Frauds has 
 heen complied with — the signature to be inserted thereafter. 
 Indeed, les^ specific terms may be used ; for an agreement 
 to sell generally, not expressing the interest in the subject, 
 includes all the vendor's interest.' If nothing is said, it 
 will mean the fee simple, in case the vendor had such an 
 estate. 
 
 ''. A econd paragraph may then be taken up in reference 
 to thts completion of the purchase, the payments of the 
 rents and profits after certain dates, in case the purchase 
 is delayed for any cause, and generally the rights of the 
 parties as to possession, rents and interest. 
 
 3. A clause should be inserted as to the title — the ex- 
 penses connected with it — the title deeds or other evidences 
 of title, and the time within which the title is to be exam- 
 ined, and the preparation and delivery of the deed and 
 mortgage (if any), and the terms of the proposed mortgage. 
 The terms of the mortgage ought to be precisely stated, so 
 as to avoid trouble thereafter. 
 
 4. All right of ways, privileges, etc., should be considered, 
 and be afterwards inserted in the deed, as unless they are, 
 the agreement is itself no evidence, and merges in the sub- 
 sequent assurance." 
 
 The proportionate part of the taxes should be paid by the 
 purchaser, or the agreement of the parties known in that 
 regard. 
 
 5. If time is to be made of the essence of the contract, 
 
 S 
 
 C 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 a 
 
 9 
 K 
 
 
 ' Bower v. Cooper, 2 Hare, 408. 
 
 ' O'SiiUivan v. Cliixton, 26 Grant, 612. 
 
64 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 then a clause, making it clearly and expressly so, is to be 
 inserted to that effect. 
 
 6. Attention should be drawn to insurance on the prop- 
 erty pending the transfer. Where the contract transfers 
 the equitable interest of the vendor, if the premises are 
 burnt down thereafter the loss falls on the purchaser.^ 
 
 These stipulations now receive the same construction in 
 all courts.' 
 
 Care will have to be taken generally that you have the 
 signatures of all the conveying parties. A man may 
 agree to convey land, and i+ may turn out that he is only a 
 part owner, or that he has only the equity of redemption. 
 The conveyances tlid purchaser may be enabled to get in 
 these cases will be more or less incomplete, and he may not 
 choose to carry out a different purchase from wha!; he 
 intended. 
 
 The price may be at so much -pev foot, or per acre, and 
 the exact quantity of the land may not be known. This is 
 frequently a source of trouble, and should be suggested to 
 the parties. The vendor will probably say it is so many 
 feet or acres, " more or less," and clthough this common 
 phrase may produce no inconvenience when the excess or 
 deficiency is only a, few feet, or a few acres, yet, when there 
 is a discrepancy more than either of the parties expecte 1, 
 it has to be bargained for over again. 
 
 t 
 
 VII. SUMMARY. 
 
 To recapitulate then, it will be necessary to consider the 
 following before the parties sign an agreement for the sale 
 of land : — 
 
 1. Are all the owners parties vendors ? 
 
 2. Are all the future owners purchasers ? 
 
 3. Is the land correctly described ; and is the interest 
 
 ' But it is otherwise in a contract under a decree \There, till the report 
 on sale is confirmed, the sale is not absolutely final. See Stevenson v. 
 Bain, 7 P. R. 258. 
 
 * Ont. Judicature Act, 1S81, sec. 17. See Taylor &• E'u-art, page 51. 
 
AGREEMKNTS — CONDITIONS OF SALE. 
 
 66 
 
 which the purchaser is to take fully set out ; and is there 
 to be any compensation for a deticiency ? 
 
 4. Is the consideration set out '? 
 
 5. Is there to be a mortgaj^e taken back and if so, what 
 are its terms ? 
 
 6. When is possession to be given ? 
 
 7. Is a good title to be shewn and how is this limited as 
 to deeds, &c. ? 
 
 8. What abcut the taxes, rates, &c. ? 
 
 9. Are there any special covenants — any right of ways — 
 easements — lanes — fences ? 
 
 10. Is anything to be decided by a valuation — fixtures, 
 crops, timber, &c. ? 
 
 11. Who is to bear the expenses of the conveyance and 
 searches as to title, &c. ? 
 
 12. Is time to be of the essence of the contract ? 
 
 13. Is any one of the parties an agent for any of the ven- 
 dors or purchasers, and if so, is he lawfully authorized to 
 sign for them ? 
 
 14. At whose risk is the property till the transfer is 
 complete ? 
 
 VII. CONDITIONS OF SALE. 
 
 A sale by private contract embodies in the agreement 
 therefor the terms of sale, and the particulars of the pro- 
 perty. In a sale by public auction it is usual to keep Uie 
 former — the conditions cf sale — separate. In sales under the 
 High Court of Justice, they are always separate or refoned 
 to as a distinct matter to which an intending purchaser 
 must take hoed. They are intended to restrict the pur- 
 chaser's ordinary rights and as he has had no voice in their 
 preparation it is essential that tht hould l)o clear and 
 intelligible in stating to a man of o. ^.ry understanding 
 what he is not to require, and that they should not be of 
 such a nature as to mislead or deceivu him.' If too striug- 
 
 I 
 
 a 
 n 
 
 a 
 
 
 
 ' Dav. Con. 44^.. 
 
 o's.c. 
 
66 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 i4li'iiii 
 
 ent they may have a bad effect on the sale, and if the vendor 
 is a trustee he must guard against unnecessarily depreciat- 
 ing conditions in order that he may not become personally 
 liable for any consequent loss.' On the other hand, as the 
 undertaking is one in which you propose to defend your title 
 against the whole world, it is important the title be carefully 
 looked into, and its nature, tenure and its burthens plainly 
 and distinctly stated*; and everything that aman intending 
 to purchase requires, made known to him — providing 
 against misrepresentation and misdescription^ either of 
 which might prevent the vendor from enforcing the contract. 
 The terms on which the property is to be sold and the title 
 such as the vendor can give, arc of coarse leading clauses 
 in the conditions. The agreement to purchase is drawn up 
 by the vendors' solicitors, and incorporates by reference the 
 conditions of sale. In Mr. Deane's excellent book on con- 
 veyancing will be found good instructions as to the points 
 necessary to be noted in drawing up conditions of sale. 
 But many of the conditions have ordinarily very little sig- 
 nificance in this province. 
 
 1st Condition refers to the manner of conducting the sale 
 — the minimuin advance — the biddings, disputes as to them 
 and instructions until the property is knocked down to 
 some one. It also ]> n'ides as to reserve bids. 
 
 2nd Condition provides for the payment of deposit at so 
 much per cent, and the signing of a memorandum by the 
 purchaser acknowledging that he has pin-chased the pro- 
 perty at the price named, and subject to the conditions. 
 
 3rd Condition provides for a valuation of fixtures, timber 
 and other trees. 
 
 Other conditions refer to the title to be shewn and ex- 
 penses connected therewith ; the payment of purchase 
 money ; possession, rents, interest ; the time to complete 
 purchase, and compensation for failure therein, and for- 
 feiture of the deposit. 
 
 ' Dance v Goldinirltaiii, L. R. 8, Chy 902. 
 
 ' Greenwood Con. 7. 
 
 1 See Bviiii'fit v. Martin. 30 L. T. 98. 
 
AGREEMENTS — SUUSEQl.'ENT MATTERS. 
 
 67 
 
 The condition enabling the vendors to resell should always 
 he inserted, as if it were omitted the vendors, though en- 
 titled to a lien on the estate, for the unpaid purchase money 
 could only enforce such lien l)y a suit in P^quity.' 
 
 IX. SUBSEQUENT MATTERS. 
 
 1. Discharge. An agreement required by the Statute of 
 Frauds to be in writing, may before breach be discharged 
 by parol. In Goss v. Niificnt," Denman C. J. said : 
 
 " As there is no clause in the Statute of Frauds which 
 requires the dissolution of such contracts to be in writing, 
 it seems that a written contract concerning the sale of lands 
 may still be waived and abandoned by a new agreement 
 not in writing, so as to prevent either party from recovering 
 on the contract which was in writing." 
 
 After breach a release must be under seal ; but if made 
 for a valuable consideration a simple contract will be suffi- 
 cient. A contract may be discharged by alteration or can- 
 cellation as referred to heretofore. 
 
 2. Transfer. The party entitled to the benefit of a con- 
 tract may assign it so as to place his vendee in as good a 
 position as he held. (See chapter on Assignments.) 
 
 3. Merger. When an agreement under seal is dra^ n 
 up in pursuance of a simple contract, as where a deed of 
 grant is executed pursuant to a written agreement, the latter 
 becomes merged in the deed, and this is material in convey- 
 ancing. It often happens that the agreement between the 
 parties contains some particulars or covenants not inserted 
 in the deed. Ordinarily in this case the parties can look no 
 longer to the agreement but to the deed. And so where a 
 purchaser had an agreement by which certain things were 
 to be performed, and no mention of these were made in his 
 deed, he is without remedy as they should have been in- 
 serted in the deed.^ A suit may be instituted to make the 
 assurance conform to the agreement, but until the necessary 
 changes are made the Court will look only to the deed. 
 
 ■ Hayes Con. 171. 
 
 • 5 B. & Ad. 58. 
 
 J O'Sullivan v. Cliixton. 26 Grant 612. 
 
 Q 
 
 is 
 
 is 
 
 a 
 
 
CHAPTER IV. 
 
 SALES OF LAND 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 II. Recitals. 
 
 III. Consideration AND Receipt 
 
 Clause. 
 
 IV. Grant and Feoffment. 
 
 V. Nature of Grant : 
 
 1. Life Estate. 
 
 2. Fee Tail. 
 
 3. Fee Simple. 
 
 VI. Description, 
 VII. Easements. 
 VIII. PTabendum. 
 
 IX. 
 
 Covenants : 
 
 
 I. Title. 
 
 
 2. Quiet Enjoyment. 
 
 
 3. Free from Encumbrance 
 
 
 4. Further Assurance. 
 
 
 5. Production. 
 
 
 6. General Release, 
 
 X. 
 
 Dower : 
 
 
 1. Marriage Settlement. 
 
 
 2. Election. 
 
 3. Adultery. 
 
 4. Alimony. 
 
 5. Do7ver in Wild Lands. 
 XI. Subsequent Matters : 
 
 1. Vendor's Lien. 
 
 2. Interest, Costs, etc., 
 
 (Wan 
 
 m 
 
 I. PRELIMINARY. 
 
 In acting for either vendor or purchaser, ^a solicitor may 
 have to consider the contract as embodied in conditions of 
 sale, or in a written agreement. Mevy frequently, however, 
 in this Province, the parties having agreed upon the price 
 and other obvious data, come to a solicitor, in order to have 
 their " deeds " drawn up. Some observations on various 
 matters connected with sales of land before a conveyance 
 is executed, will now be given. 
 
 In ail sales and purchases, the title is of course the first 
 thing to be investigated ; and where the purchase has been 
 
SALES OF LAND — PRELIMINARY. 
 
 69 
 
 made under a public auction, or where there is a written 
 agreement, the terms of the sale must first of all be care- 
 hilly looked into to see what the vendor has apjreed to fur- 
 nish, and what the purchaser is entitled to ask. An 
 abstract is obtained aud gone over, with such deeds as can 
 be obtained. The question whether possession has gone 
 consistently with the paper title, must not be omitted, and 
 all the various points referred to in the chapter on Titles 
 thoroughly examined and found satisfactory. Where there 
 iri a written contract, the particulars will generally be found 
 embodied therein. And lare must be taken that every 
 tiling in it material to I hi purchaser be inserted in the 
 deed ; because, after the deed is once executed, the agree- 
 ment can ordinarily no longer be looked at. The agreement 
 becomes merged — loses its existence in the deed of grant. 
 And so, where the conditions, or agreement, speak of rights 
 of way, or refer to plans, etc., the purchaser may lose the 
 benefit of the terms of the agreement, unless they are 
 secured to him in the deed.' 
 
 Revised Statutes of Ontario, cap. 98, contains what 
 statutory law there is in reference to auctions. 
 
 There will generally be more difticulty where there is an 
 agreement, than where property is bought at a public 
 auction, or by private tender. In the latter cases, the 
 purchaser generally buys the property on the vendor's own 
 terms, without any variations. An agreement is, however, 
 the result of letters or conferences, and it may happen that 
 the parties are misled or mistaken. It may also happen 
 that both would wish to reform the agreement. In the 
 latter case, so long as an agreement is open between the 
 parties, and the time for performance has not arrived, a 
 new agreement may be substituted for it, postponing the 
 period for performance, and no new consideration will be 
 necessary.' So, where an additional year was granted to 
 remove timber on premises sold, the vendor was afterwards 
 
 09 
 
 05 
 
 c 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 a 
 n 
 
 
 
 
 ' O'Siillivan v. Cliixton, 26 Grant, 612. 
 
 - Hurburt v. Thovias, 3 Q. B. 258 ; O'Donnell v. Hugill. 11 Q. B. 441. 
 
70 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 
 
 held not at liberty to revoke the extension.' But no 
 variation can be made except by consent of all parties 
 interested. 
 
 Where one party is misled by the other — where fraud is 
 practised — the Court will set the agreement aside on the 
 general principle that fraud avoids every transaction tainted 
 with it. 
 
 Another frequent source of difficulty is the amount of 
 land sold, which may be more, but is generally less, than 
 the parties understood or represented. It is never an easy 
 matter to adjust the amount of compensation where the 
 parties agree to that being done ; and there is no hard or 
 fast rule as to when the Court will allow compensation to 
 be made. Thus, in one case, 21 acres out of 200 was held 
 not to be a subject for compensation,- while 56 acres out of 
 300 was allowed in another case.'* And where the property 
 was held out to be 96 acres, cleared and cultivated, and 
 upon a survey it appeared to be that the cleared land was 
 14^ acres under cultivation and legal fence, and 12:^ acres 
 of pasture land never cultivated, this was also held to bo 
 a proper case for reduction.' 
 
 The growing crops on land arc part of it, and go with 
 the freehold when it is sold." 
 
 A misdescription in a conveyance may be a ground for 
 compensation, even after the conveyance is executed." 
 
 An abatement may also be made in the purchase money, 
 when the vendor's wife refuses to release her dower, as the 
 purchaser is entitled to have it conveyed to him in some 
 way.' 
 
 The objection that the agreement was made on a Sunday 
 is a valid one, as such an agreement is void." 
 
 ' Lazifrcnce \. Erriiigioii, 21 Chy.aOi. 
 
 - Follis V. Porter, ii Chy. 442. 
 
 ! Wardi'll V. Trenouth, 24 Chy, 465. 
 
 4 Canada Permanent Building and Loan Society v. Young, iS Chy. 566. 
 
 5 Stewart v. Hunter, 2 Chy. Cha. 335. 
 «> Bull V. Harper, 7 P. R. 36. 
 
 7 Kendrew v. Shewan, 4 Chy. 578; Skinner v. Ainsworth, 24 Chy. 148. 
 « Lai V. Stall, 6 Q. B. 506. 
 
SALES OF LAND — PRELIMINARY. 
 
 71 
 
 Where there is no agreement or conditions of sale, but 
 where the parties come for the purpose of hnving a valid 
 transfer made, the task of the conveyancer is simple, 
 though responsible. The bargain has been made before- 
 hand, but, when possible, the terms should bo reduced into 
 writing, unless the instruments are prepared, approved of, 
 and executed at the same time. 
 
 The ordinary statutory forms of conveyances to be pro- 
 cured at a law stationer's, suggest a good many of the things 
 to be attended to, and by attention to the details set out in 
 the introduction, and the chapter on Agreements, there 
 will be little difficulty in getting the blank form into an 
 eti'ective conveyance. 
 
 Revised Statutes of Ontario, cap. 10*2, is the authority for 
 short forms of conveyances. The Act does not prescribe any 
 particular form to the exclusion of others — it allows the 
 widest latitude to any form of deed ; but in order to get 
 the benefit of the Act, the deed" must be made in pursuance 
 of it, or refer to it, no doubt for the purpose of incorporating 
 the Act in the deed. The benefit of the Act is entirely in 
 the expansion given to the covenants, and in the enumera- 
 tion of the appurtenances, easements, privileges, etc., that 
 are set forth in the 4th section. But there is otherwise no 
 intrinsic efficacy in a deed under the statute, as was referred 
 to in the Introductory Chapter, The deed follows the 
 antiquated form of " This Indenture," etc., though deeds 
 are no longer indented — the date follows, and then the 
 reference to the statute — the parties — recitals, if any — the 
 testatum clause — the consideration and receipt clauses — 
 the granting part — the parcels, and the covenants, and 
 provisos. 
 
 This is the ordinary and time-honoured form of deeds of 
 grant, except that a hahcwhun and tenendum were added 
 in the old conveyances, which are not in the form suggested 
 by the statute. The grant under the statute includes 
 everything set out in section 4, as houses, outhouses, etc., 
 etc., and conveys without a hahendum. 
 
 A reference incorporating the statute can ordinarily do 
 no harm ; and the absence of it may leave the covenants 
 
 S 
 
 CO 
 
 C 
 
 I 
 
 I 
 
 n 
 
 
 
 t 
 
^> 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^^. \^^ 
 
 ^\ ^0.1 
 
 ^ <^\> 
 
 ^^^ 
 
 ^^ 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 y 
 
 
 
 I/. 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 ip 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 11.25 
 
 1^' U^ 1112.2 
 
 «40 
 
 2.0 
 
 1.8 
 
 U. IIIIII.6 
 
 ^ 
 
 <^ 
 
 /] 
 
 
 ^/. 
 
 V 
 
 >^ 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. M580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 

 <p 
 
 
 v#^^^ 
 
 z 
 
 .6> 
 
 » 
 
72 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 and conveying part shorn of much of their expected signifi- 
 cance. The cases in which the statute cannot be used are 
 quite exceptional. 
 
 II. RECITALS. 
 
 Recitals are divided by Mr. Deane, in his work on con- 
 veyancing, into two kinds ; namely, narrative recitals, which 
 set out the facts and instruments necessary to shew the 
 title, and the relation of the parties to the subject matter 
 of the deed ; and introductory recitals which explain the 
 motives for the preparation and execution of the deed. 
 Narrative recitals have not been much used in this Pro- 
 vince in the sense in which English conveyancers use them. 
 Tlie Registry offices here would shew nearly all that such 
 recitals are intended to evidence. Our Act, corresponding 
 to the English Vendors' and Purchasers' Act of 1874, which 
 makes all recitals twenty years old at the date of the con- 
 tract, unless proved to be inaccurate, sufficient evidence of 
 the statements contained in them, will not, for some time, be 
 so useful as the English Act. If introductory recitals are 
 to come immediately after the narrative recitals, as Mr. 
 Deane suggests, then it would seem that there would be no 
 necessity for them at all. However, independent of tech- 
 nical classification, recitals are often used in conveyancing 
 in this Province, and are likely to be availed of hereafter ; 
 but, in the simplest form of purchase deeds, they are not, 
 even in England, introduced.' The tendency there is to do 
 away with unnecessary recitals. The better rule seems to 
 be, that recitals are necessary whenever the deed itself does 
 not clearly imply for what purpose any person joining in it 
 is made a party," or whenever the covenants into which he 
 enters shew that he has only a qualified interest in the 
 propeiiy sold. From this it would follow that recitals are 
 necessary in all cases where the property is vested in dif- 
 ferent persons, each having partial estates ; or in trustees, 
 or others selling under a power of sale ; and also, whenever 
 
 • Davidson's Con. 43. 
 » I Prid. Con. 180. 
 
SALES OF LAND — RECITALS. 
 
 73 
 
 the estate is subject to encumbrances which are noticed in 
 the deed/ 
 
 In practice, in this Province, the latter fact is not 
 always deemed special enough to be the subject of a 
 recital. After the covenant in the deed, that the grantor 
 has done no act to encumber the land, there is added a 
 clause, ** save and except a certain mortgage made by the 
 party of the first part to A. B. to secure the repayment to 
 him of $ , and is dated day of 188 ." 
 
 If the purchaser is to assume the mortgage, and covenant 
 to pay the mortgage money, then it may be as well to recite 
 these facts in the beginning of the deed, and insert the 
 covenant amongst the other covenants.'' 
 
 A recital is directed to be worded in very general terms, 
 because, if it conflicts with the operative part, it will over- 
 ride and determine its significance " A recital in a deed, 
 though it estop the party asserting it from disputing its 
 accuracy,* is still not binding on a purchaser, unless, accord- 
 ing to the rules of evidence, it would be received as proof of 
 the matters recited.' A purchaser may, however, be bound 
 by conditions of sale requiring him to accept such recitals, 
 unless they are rebutted.* 
 
 If the conveyance expresses, contrary to the fact, that the 
 purchase money is paid, though the estate passes at law, 
 yet equity will not permit the inirchaser to possess and 
 enjoy the estate for his own use, benefit and advantage, 
 unless he pays down the purchase money.' 
 
 When a recital in a deed is intended to be a statement 
 which all the parties to the deed have mutually agreed to 
 admit as true, it is an estoppel upon all. But where it is in- 
 tended to be the statement of one party only, the estoppel 
 
 ' Deane, 332. 
 
 ^ See post as to Special Covenants. 
 
 ' y inner v. Jcnner, i L. R. i Eq. 361 ; Rookc v. Kensington, 2 K. & J. 753. 
 
 * Hayes on Con. 148. 
 
 5 Hills V. Laming, 9 Ex. 256. 
 
 * Hayes, 148. 
 
 7 Winter v. Lvrd Anson, i Sim. & Stu. 444. 
 
 Ill 
 I 
 
74 
 
 PILVCTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 is confined to that party, and the intention is to be gathered 
 fioin construing the whole instrument.' 
 
 Ah between the parties themselves, any averment of a 
 fact, made by one of the parties, in the nature of a repre- 
 sentation orwa)'ranty,to the other, may l)e contradicted, and 
 shown to bo false, by that other.^ But the party himself 
 who makes the averment is not permitted to contradict or 
 dispute the fact recited.' A recital may have the effect of 
 a covenant as between the parties.' 
 
 The recitals in a deed may not be conclusive as to the 
 facts therein stated"; and an erroneous recital will not 
 necessarily bind the party claiming under the deed con- 
 taining such recital.* 
 
 HI. CONSIDERATION AND RECEIPT CLAUSES. 
 
 The general rule of law is, that no cause or consideration 
 is essential to tlu' validity of a contract under seal. In 
 conveyances of land, however, that are intended to operate 
 under the Statute of Uses, such as bargain and sale, and 
 a covenant to stand seized to a use, a good consideration 
 was deemed by the Court of Chancery to be essential. Not- 
 withstanding that no money consideration ever passed in 
 the former of these deeds, if a consideration be stated upon 
 their face, the deed is valid and effectual, because no evi- 
 dence could be admitted to contradict the deed.' In the 
 covenant to stand seized, the good consideration is blood, 
 or kindred, or marriage ; this being established, the courts 
 gave the covenantee the use of the land just as the money 
 consideration in the bargain and sale raised a use on the 
 
 ■ Stroiigbill V. Duck, 14 Q. B. 787 ; Wilcsv. Woodward, 20 L. J. Ex. 264. 
 - Hayuf V. Mnltby, 3 T. K. 441. 
 ' Hiinibk V. Hunter, 12 Q. B. 310. 
 * Addison on Contracts, 924. 
 s Neale v. Winter, gC. P. 304. 
 
 ' Laiflor V. Murchinson. 4 Chy, •2^4. To those who deal in recitals, Mr. 
 Hayes' rules (pajje 213, Conveyancing) w'll probably be ot benefit, but 
 they Jo not seem important enough to be introduced here. 
 
 ' Addison on Contracts, 47. 
 
BALES OF LAND — CONSIDERATION AND RECEIPT CLAUSES. 7.> 
 
 vendee.' The profound reasoning that gave rise to tliis 
 doctrine is not a matter of great practical benefit to a 
 modern conveyancer. The courts, at present, do not find 
 much difiiculty in discovering what the consideration in a 
 deed was, or whether there was any consideration at all. 
 
 As against a purchaser for value, a voluntary deed, thou;^'h 
 registered, is void * ; and a sale at an undorvalue, to a per- 
 son under whose intiuence the grantor is, is as ohjectionahlc 
 as a gift would be under the like circumstances.* The 
 Voluntary Conveyance Act of 18()8 gave effect as against 
 subsequent purchasers to prior voluntary conveyances 
 executed in good faith, and to them only.* 
 
 Conveyances of land among relatives give rise to ditticult 
 •[iiestions in regard to consideration. A man in difticultit s, 
 or foreseeing them, will frequently transfer his property to 
 his wife, or other relative, and probably find out after an 
 expensive litigation, that his grantee is only a trustee for 
 his creditors. Still, some transactions of the kind mavstantl. 
 Where a husband carried on a prosperous business, with 
 considerable chattel property over his debts, bought land 
 and conveyed it to his wife, who was instrumental in 
 increasing his earnings, the transaction was upheld, when it 
 was not proved to have been made with a view of placing 
 the property beyond the reach of future creditors' ; l)ut it 
 would be otherwise if the husband was in difficulties, and 
 could not get credit, and was in debt." 
 
 The case of Lnvin v. Lurin'' is one of the latest on 
 voluntary conveyances, and cites the well-known cases on 
 this subject. 
 
 The receipt clause in an ordinary deed is not taken jis a 
 receipt under seal ; nor is the acknowledgment held to he a 
 binding recital. It can, therefore, be shewn that no money 
 
 ' Addison on Contracts, 46. 
 
 » Buchanan v. Campbell, 14 Chy. 1C3. 
 
 • Mason v. Scncy, 12 Chy. 143. 
 
 ♦ Richardson v. Arniitage, 18 Chy. 512. 
 
 5 Collard V. Bennett, Can. Law Times, July, 1881, 442. 
 
 * Jackson V. Bowman, 14 Grant, 156. 
 ' 27 Chy. 567. 
 
76 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 was paid, or that a different sum was paid from that men- 
 tioned. Occasionally, a receipt under seal is embodied in 
 the deed, and this, of course, in the absence of fraud, would 
 be conclusive. If the conveyance expresses, contrary to 
 the fact, that the purchase money is paid, though the estate 
 passes at law, yet equity will not permit the jiurchaser to 
 possess and enjoy the estate for his own use, benefit, and 
 advantage, unless he pays down the purchase money.' 
 
 Where a registered deed of conveyance acknowledges 
 payment of the consideration money, such acknowledgment 
 is sufficient evidence of payment, except so far as such 
 acknowledgment is proved to be inaccurate.* 
 
 The only advantage of the endorsed receipt clause is 
 that it relieves a subsequent purchaser from the necessity 
 of ascertaining that the consideration was in fact paid,' and 
 its absence may give rise to enquiry ; but the parenthetical 
 receipt clause in the body of the deed does not, it seems, 
 estop a vendor from disputing the fact of the receipt,* unless 
 it is followed by a formal release from all claims on account 
 of the 2)urchase money * ; and it cannot in any case prevent 
 him from disproving the receipt in equity.* 
 
 Where a vendor does not attend personall}' to receive 
 the purchase money, the purchaser may insist on a written 
 authority to pay to the vendor's solicitor, although a receipt 
 signed by the vendor may be endorsed on the deed.' 
 
 IV. GRANT AND FEOFFMENT. 
 
 The student need not be told tliat formerly, in England, 
 when the owner of tenements or hereditaments was owner in 
 l)Gssessiou, and wished to transfer his estate to another, he 
 
 * Winter v. Lord Anson, i Sim. and Stu. 444. 
 - Rev. Stat. Ont.,cap. J09, sec. i. 
 
 ' Dav. Con. 65. 
 
 * Lt'c V. Lancashire Ry. Coy., L. R., 6 Chv. 527-534 ; Laiiipon v. Corke, 5 
 B. & A. 60C-611. 
 
 5 Baker V. Dewey, i B. & C. 704. 
 
 * Hawkins v. Gardiner, 2 Sm. & Giff. 441. 
 7 Viney v. Chaplin. 2 De G. & J. 468. 
 
SALES OF LAND — GRANT AND FEOFFMENT. 
 
 77 
 
 men- 
 
 ilid 80 by a feoffment and livery of seisin. A feoffment was 
 a formal statement by the owner that ho gave it to the 
 feoffee, and in order to complete and render effectual the 
 conveyance, the possession of the land was formally given 
 over to the feoffee. This was livery (delivery) of seisin, and 
 both acts were required to be done at the same time ; the 
 estate took effect in possession at once. It is easy to see 
 tliai if the estate was one in reversion, or remainder, except 
 after an estate for years, no livery of seisin could take place. 
 In order to sell these, a deed of grant was necessary, and a 
 delivery of the deed to the grantee. This is what is meant, 
 therefore, by saying that reversions and remainders were 
 said to " lie in grant " and estates in possession to " lie in 
 livery." In England, by 8 and 9 Vic, cap. 106, and, subse- 
 quently, in this Province, by what is now R. S. 0., cap. 98, 
 it was enacted that the immediate freehold of corporeal tene- 
 ments and hereditaments should lie in grant as well as in 
 livery'; so that not only reversions and remainders, but 
 all estates in possession can now be transferred by deed of 
 grant. But there is nothing to prevent a conveyance being 
 made by feoffment and livery of seisin, should any person 
 of antiquated taste choose so to have it. A feoffment is in- 
 cluded in the word conveyance,* and the statute only re- 
 (juires that it shall be by deed,' instead of a parol statement. 
 In the old deeds, the word grant implied a warranty of the 
 title, and the grantee could sue on it as upon a covenant ; 
 liut it has no such effect now, and under the Acts relating 
 to the short forms, no extended signification is given to it. 
 No additional etiicacy whatever is given to a deed of grant 
 under the Act respecting short forms of conveyance. 
 It takes up a very simple form of conveyance as a 
 model, and simply declares that if that form, or any otlier 
 form of deed, be used, and that the instrument is made in 
 pursuance of the Act, then you can use the abbreviated form 
 for the covenants in column one, and they will be read as if the 
 extended form of column two were used ; and that unless an 
 
 ■ Sec. 2. 
 
 ■' Sec. I, sub-sec. 2. 
 
 < Sec. 3. 
 
78 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVPIYANCINO. 
 
 exception be made as to houses, etc., the estate intended to 
 be conveyed will include allhouses, outhouses, edifices, etc., 
 mentioned in sec. 4 of the Act. The Act takes its efficacy 
 entirely from two sources — from chapter 98 of the Revised 
 Statutes, sec. 2, where estates in possossion are made to lie 
 in grant, and from the Common Law of England, where 
 reversions and remainders were always capable of convey- 
 ance by a deed of grant, liut the Act does no more than lessen 
 the length of a deed,and lea vis any subtle questions about uses 
 and trusts as they were before its passing. The estate is 
 simply " granted " to the purchaser or grantee, and no 
 halti'ndum clause is introduced, so that it may, in its expanded 
 form, be regarded as a common law deed of . 'ant, conveying 
 the land, but without any warranty or right of re-entry or 
 covenant by implication in the word grant. 
 
 If this be the true construction of the statute, as the writer 
 submits with deference, it leaves sec. 2 of the llcv. Stat., 
 cap. 98, precisely as it was, so far as a statutory conveyance 
 is concerned. The effect of the section is, as was inti- 
 mated, to allow estates in possession to be conveyed by 
 deed of grant. It is apprehended that the effect of this sec- 
 tion is to put these estates on the same legal footing with 
 estates in reversion and remainder, as if the common law 
 always permitted a transfer by deed. If so, how is a con- 
 veyance under the short forms affected by the Statute of 
 Uses ? This was the difficulty in Seaton v. Lunncy.^ Land 
 was there conveyed by the court to trustees, their 
 heirs and assigns for ever, to have and to hold to 
 the trustees, their heirs and assigns for ever, upon 
 trust to permit the rents and profits to go to a married 
 •woman, etc. The court held there that the trustees took 
 the legal estate, though counsel, who is now the present 
 Chancellor, strenuously argued that the trustee was a mere 
 conduit-pipe to pass the estate to another, and Blake, V.C, 
 did not seem to object to that construction. Proudfoot, 
 V.C, looking at the intention of the deed, held the trus- 
 tees to be the legal owners, and that whether it operated 
 
 27 Grant, 169; Ibid, page 177. 
 
RALES OF LAND — OnANT AND FKFFOMENT. 
 
 79 
 
 as a bargain and sali-, or as a grant. lie says, ** The word 
 ' grant' can he construed to operate as a bargain and sale 
 so as to effect this intention, and I think that ought to be 
 the construction of it." With great deference to the learned 
 Vice-Chancellor, the writer submits that there is no suffi- 
 cient authority for this. A bargain and sale always trans- 
 fers the legal estate, because of the use raised by a money 
 c(msideration ; and even though the consideration be one 
 penny, or a pepper-corn rent, still no evidence can be held 
 to question the consideration. The bargainee acquired the 
 practical ownership of the land, which the Court of Chan- 
 cery awarded to him, but it was not till the Statute of Uses 
 that this use was " married to the law," as Coke says. 
 After that useless enactment, the bargainee was the legal 
 owner, and so the law remains to this day. How was it 
 with a feoffment or grant ? A grant to A. to the use of B. 
 gave A. the legal estate at common law, which estate the 
 Court of Chancery bound him in conscience to hold to the 
 use of B, and then the Statute of Uses gave B. the legal 
 estate. What difference does our statute make on this con- 
 struction now '? Surely not from the short forms Act, which 
 uses the word grant simply, and has no hahemlnm ,• and 
 certainly not the Revised Statute, cap. 98, sec. (5, which has 
 shorn the word grant of much of its common law meaning. 
 It is submitted that before the trustees in Scat on v. Lunnrif 
 could have got the legal estate, the grant should have been 
 made " unto and to the use " of the trustees, and that no 
 habendum was necessary. Instead of that, the grant was 
 to them, their heirs and assigns, to hold to them, their 
 heirs and assigns, upon trust, etc., and there was sufficient 
 upon the face of the deed to rebut any inference of a momy 
 consideration which distinguishes and is essential to a 
 bargain and sale. 
 
 A distinction is hinted at as to uses and trusts in tlu; 
 learned Vice-Chancellor's judgment, and probably the 
 strongest point in favour of vesting the legal estate in the 
 trustees is, that a trust is declared for certain purposes, and 
 that there must be a use executed before a trust can arise. 
 But there is no difference between this use of the words 
 
80 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 " use " 
 
 and "truHt," and the diHtinction in unimportant, 
 except historically. When the statute was exhausted in tiie 
 first use, every subsequent use was declared by the courtesy 
 of the Court of Chancery to be a trust. The same treatment 
 was applied to trusts after the Statute of Uses as was ap- 
 plied to uses before it. (See post Habendum.) 
 
 'II 
 lii 
 
 V. NATURE OF GRANT. 
 
 Such interests as are usually comprised in a grant of land 
 may be referred to in three classes. These are : 
 
 1. A life estate. 
 
 2. An estate tail. 
 
 3. An estate in fee simple. 
 
 The first of these is a freehold simply — the others are 
 estates of inheritances as well. The Act respecting short 
 forms of conveyances, it seems, does not apply to estates less 
 than freeholds. 
 
 1. A Life £j state. Each separately,' and both together, 
 of the two former, are contained in the last, and any num- 
 ber of life estates in either of the other two. Chattel inter- 
 ests under leases may, to any number of years, be carried 
 out of any estate of freehold ; and the law still deems a 
 residue — even in a life estate — remaining. So that A., 
 enjoying an estate of freehold for his life, may, at the age of 
 eighty years, make a lease for ninety-nine years, and the 
 lease be a valid lease, though it endure only till the death 
 of A. 
 
 Before considering what estate can be conveyed to a pur- 
 chaser, it is manifest regard must first be had to the 
 <in<mtum of interest the grautor possesses. No freehold 
 interest in life, in fee tail, or fee simple, can be conveyed 
 by a grantor possessing a chattel interest, and, odd as it 
 may be, the owner of an estate for nine hundred and ninety- 
 nine years could not convey a life estate to his own grand- 
 father. The impossibility of course would be greater in the 
 other two estates of freehold, and so no lessee for years can 
 
 M 
 
8ALK8 OF LAND — NATURE OF ORANT. 
 
 81 
 
 of 
 le 
 ;li 
 
 l-ed 
 it 
 
 y- 
 
 id- 
 he 
 an 
 
 grant a life estate. Notliing short of a freehold will suffice. 
 In England some corporations,' and infants,* have excep- 
 tional powers in this regard. The conveying words to 
 be UHed when an estate for life is intended to he granted 
 are simply, " to A." This is sutticient to give a life estate 
 to A., and will give him no more. It is probably more 
 usual to say, to A. to hold for the term of his own life, or 
 some other person's life. Where a man holds an estate for 
 the life of another, or others, ho is a tenant par (inter lic. 
 if the grantor has only a life estate, and convey a life 
 estate out of it when he (the grantor) dies, the grantee's 
 estate expires — as it also would on the grantee's death, before 
 that of the grantor. But if the gi'antor has an estate of 
 inheritance, the grantee will have the estate for his own 
 life, no matter if his grantor die immediately after the 
 grant. This is under the rule of grants, being construed 
 most strongly against the grantee. 
 
 A lease or grant of lands for life cannot, by a common 
 law conveyance, be made to commence in futuro; and, 
 unless by instrument operating under the statute of Uses, 
 the estate must commence on the date of execution of the 
 grant.' Life estates are not usual in this country, though 
 it frequently happens that parents reserve to themselves a 
 life estate when conveying to their children. It will be 
 worth while considering the mutual position of both parties 
 where an estate for life is conveyed or reserved. 
 
 The legal incidents flowing from an estate for life being 
 in question instead of a lease for years, should be explained 
 to the parties. The grantee (or his heirs) is not to be pre- 
 judiced by the sudden determination of the estate, so as not 
 to enjoy the fruits of his labours. He is entitled to crops 
 sown by him, the emblements, corn-roots, etc., and also to 
 the permanent or natural profit of the earth, as fruit, grass, 
 etc.* , 
 
 ' 32 Henry VIII., cap. 28, 5 Geo. iii., cap. 17; 5 & 6 Vic, 108. 
 
 » 18 & 19 Vic, cap. 43. 
 
 ' Leith & Smith's Blackstone, page 163. 
 
 * Leith £: Smith's Blackstone, page 132. 
 
 o's.c. 
 
 S 
 
 8 (jfl 
 
 s 
 
81 ritACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 He is entitled to nasonahh' rttovers or hotfix, but only for 
 the purpOHif of the eHtate from whicli they are taken.' 
 Thougli not allowed to cut down timber, ho may foil timber 
 for repairs, lie may get stone for the purpose of doing 
 repairs on the property of which he is tenant from any 
 existing quarries on the estate ; and has a right to cut under- 
 wood when fit for cutting, and to have for his own benefit 
 the thinnings of trees, such as fir trees, which arc planted 
 for tho protection of other trees rather than for profit*; and 
 of tiinber cut for the necessary purpose of preserving or 
 allowing the gi-owth of other trees.* He can work mines 
 already opened, if lawfully done by a preceding tenant, and 
 even sometimes when opened after the settlement under 
 which he claims.* He can rebuild buildings blown down 
 by the wind, and fell timber for that purpose ; but he ban 
 no interest in the timber till severed, even when he is not 
 liable for waste, and when wrongfully severed, can receive 
 no benefit from it. When timber is blown down, the course 
 suggested is, to sell it, invest the proceeds, and pay the in- 
 terests to the successive tenants for life, when there arc 
 such.'' Timber in a decaying state may, when it is for the 
 benefit of the inheritance, be cut down by the sanction of the 
 High Court of Justice, provided that it is actually decaying, 
 or is injuring the growth of other trees.* Otherwise, the 
 tenant cannot cut down timber, though decayed, for any 
 other purpose than that of doing repairs on the estate.^ 
 This is the effect of the decisions in England, where, of 
 course, wood is more valuable than in (Canada. Here, it is 
 apprehended that timber may be cut down to cultivate wild 
 lands, even by a tenant for life ; but this would largely de- 
 pend upon the quantity of woodland and clearing on the 
 land in question, and upon other circumstances unaffecting 
 
 • Leev. Alston, i Bro. C. C. 194. 
 
 ' Pidgeley v. Rawling. 2 Coll. 275 ; R. v. Ferrybridge, i B. & C. 375. 
 « Hontywood v. Honeywood, \V. N. (1874) 131 ; L. R. 18 Eq. 306. 
 
 * Claverlng v. Clavering, 2 P. Wms. 388. 
 5 Batemau wHotchkin, 31 Beav. 486. 
 
 '' Berwick v. Whitfield, 3 P. \Vm. 297 ; Hussey v. Httssey, 5 Madd. 44. 
 7 Per rot I v. Per rot t, 3 Atk. 94. 
 
BALES OF LAND — NATURK OF ORANT. 
 
 Jting 
 
 J75 
 
 44- 
 
 tlie English decisions. It is not waste **i a t'^nant for life 
 to cut down timber on wild land fui < . sole i)uriM)se of 
 bringing it into cultivation, provided the inheritance be not 
 damaged thereby, and it is done in conformity with the 
 rules of good husbandry.' 
 
 If a tenant for life fells timber, or pulls down the house, 
 the lessor shall have the timber ; but if the house falls 
 down, the particular tenant has a special propeHy on the 
 timber to rebuild the house. 
 
 The property on severed trees rests in a tenant for life 
 without impeachment for waste." 
 
 This case, and the case of Garth v. Cotton, 1 Vcsey, 524- 
 526, are the leading cases as to waste, and the powers of 
 persons having estates not of inheritance. In our own 
 courts see llehner v. Williamson, 44 Q. B. 593. 
 
 Unless with a provision in the grant that the grantee for 
 life is to enjoy the premises " withoiV impeachment of 
 waste," he is not, under ordinary circumstances, allowed to 
 commit or permit any act of waste upon the property. He 
 can neither pull down old, nor erect new buildings,* nor 
 convert one species of land into another, nor open new pits 
 for gravel, nor quarry for stone in new (juarries. The saving 
 words above referred to were formerly no safeguard against 
 the committing of capricious or extravagant waste, such as 
 pulling down the mansion house, cutting ornamental tim- 
 ber, etc., which the Court of Chancery regarded as "equitable 
 waste," and extended its protection thereto.* These words 
 are not now sufficient to justify equitable waste, unless an 
 intention to confer such right shall exp: jasly appear by the 
 instrument creating the life estate. Sc- Ontario Judicature 
 Act, 1881, sec. 17, sub-sec. 8. 
 
 The tenant for life has certain limited rights as to fixtures 
 which were put up by him for the purposes of his trade." 
 
 ' Drake v. VVigle, 24 C. V. 405. 
 
 ' Lewis Bowie's case, 1 1 Co. 79 b. 
 
 ' CaUkcott V. Brtmn, 2 Hare, 144. 
 
 * Per L.J. Turner, 3 De G. & J 328, in Morris v. Harris. 
 
 "■ Lawton v. Lawtoii, 3 Atkin 12; Dudley v. Warde, Amb. 12; Lawton v. 
 Salmon, i H. B. 239 n. 
 
 s 
 
 00 
 
 C 
 a5» 
 
84 
 
 PIL\CTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 liii: 
 
 Things removable, without doing any damage to the freehold, 
 may also be taken by him or his executors even, in a reason- 
 able time after his death. 
 
 The tenant is entitled to the custody of the title deeds of 
 the land of which he is in possession,' and can assign or 
 surrender, and in certain cases easily recognized, can also 
 devise his estate for life. 
 
 A conveyance " to B. and her children forever," gave B. 
 only a life estate when there were no children at the time 
 of the deed.* 
 
 A tenant for life of the whole estate of a testator, con- 
 sisting of an improved farm, is bound to keep down the 
 whole taxes,^ and so is a devisee of a life estate.' 
 
 2. Estates Tail. In conveying estates of inheritance, 
 the word " heirs " is necessary both at common law and 
 under our statutes. To create an estate tail, additional words 
 besides the word "heirs" are required, to restrict the extent 
 of the grant to this lesser estate of inheritance. There are 
 four classes of estates tail : 
 
 General. — To A. and the heirs of his or her body. 
 
 ^hdc. — To A. and the heirs male of his or her body. 
 
 Female. — To A. and the heirs female of his or her 
 body. 
 
 ■ Special. — To A. and the heirs of his body begotten 
 upon B. 
 
 To B. and the heirs of her body begotten by A. 
 
 To A. and B. and the heirs of their bodies. 
 
 And each of these again may be "heirs male " or "heirs 
 female." 
 
 There may be a qiuui entail, as where lands are entailed 
 to A. during the lifetime of B., and to the extent of B.'s life 
 
 ' Duncombc v. Mayer, 8 Ves. 320; Bomlcs v. Stewart, 1 Sch. & L. 209- 
 223. 
 
 ' Shank v. Gates, 11 Q. B. 207. 
 
 ' Biseoe v. Van Bearle, 6 Chy. 438. 
 
 * Gray v. Hateh, 18 Chy. 72. 
 
SALES OF LAND — NATURE OF GRANT. 
 
 85 
 
 209- 
 
 the course of the entail would be guided by the same rules 
 as an ordinary estate tail. 
 
 No owner can create an estate tail unless he has in him- 
 self the fee simple. 
 
 Legal incidents of an estate tail are few but important. 
 Of itself it is incapable of alienation, but the tenant in tail 
 can convert his estate into a fee simple, and then has 
 absolute control of it, as if it originally were such. He 
 can also transfer it into a lisser estate. This conver- 
 sion is called barring the entail, and is the subject of an 
 intricate statute — 1\. S. 0., cap. 100. This assurance must 
 be registered within six months after execution, and be 
 drawn up in regular form under the statute. The wife of 
 a tenant in tail is entitled to doirer, and so must be a party 
 to a conveyance or mortgage of her husband's interest just 
 as in an estate in foe simple. The same applies to the 
 husband as to his curtcsif.'^ 
 
 3. Fee Simple. — The limitation of this estate — the 
 highest a subject can possess — is to the grantee and his 
 '■ heirs." The word assigns is unnecessary, though usually 
 added. In grants to a corporation capable of acquiring 
 land, the words " and their successors " are used. There is 
 no autlioritv for saving that these words are necessarv, 
 and there is authority that they are supertluous. An agree- 
 ment to sell a house or land generally, is an agreement to 
 sell an estate in fee simple, unless the precise interest in- 
 tended to be conveyed is otherwise speeilied, and ilie pur- 
 chaser cannot be compelled to take a less estate.- 
 
 It is unnecessary here to enter into any elucidation of 
 the mcidents of an estate in fee simple. It is the largest 
 estate in land which is permitted to a subject. It gives 
 him the absolute use of it — liberty to use it in any way not 
 injurious to his neighbour, or contrary to the law of the 
 land. But he has not the absolute ownership — the />«>- 
 
 ' The cise oi Laivlor v. Lnwlor, now enterel in the Supreme Court (tf 
 Canada, will decide a good many points re,.;ardini? estates tail. The 
 nulgments may be looked for in Vol. V. of the Supreme Court Reports. 
 The case will be referred to hereafter under Chap. Mortgages, 
 
 » Hughes V. Parker, 8 M. & \V. 244. 
 
86 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 minium, as was said before ; — and for the public good, the 
 Crown can take it from the subject, but on terms of com- 
 pensation. When the heirs of the purchaser are exhausted, 
 the crown steps in as ultimus lucres, and when he disentitles 
 himself to protection, as by a felony, it may deprive him of 
 further power over it. But ordinarily a grantee in fee 
 simple has disposing power over it, to take effect either in 
 his lifetime or afterwards ; and with no impossible restric- 
 tion so long as it is virtually his to dispose of. But in 
 estates of inheritance, the purchaser's wife may be entitled 
 to a share of the land ; and the quantum of ownership must 
 be considered with reference to her claim, and sometimes 
 to the claims of his creditors, if any. Beyond these the 
 owner's estate is practically untrammelled. 
 
 
 VI. DESCRIPTION. 
 
 Where the property is included in a registered plan, the 
 latter must be referred to ; and under our Registry Act, 
 every survey subsequent to the one made by the Crown, and 
 differing from it, must be registered. 
 
 In Stcvcus t\ Buck,^ the late Chief Justice Harrison col- 
 lected cases bearing on the Crown surveys. He says : " It 
 is usual for the Crown in this Province, before selling any 
 of the public demesne, to have a survey made of it into con- 
 cessions and lots, with appropriate numbers or other ap- 
 propriate descriptions. It is also usual for the surveyor, 
 when making the survey, to place posts or other suitable 
 monuments, so as to designate the concessions and lots on 
 the ground. It is also usual for the surveyor to report his 
 work to the Crown Lands Department, and to accompany 
 the report with his field notes, and apian shewing the survey 
 in detail. 
 
 It is competent for the Crown to adopt or reject the sur- 
 vey ; but when it adopts it with or without amendments,, 
 and makes grants in pursuance of it, these grants are con- 
 trolled by the survey." In deciding conflicting claims be- 
 
 ' 43 Q- B., pages 5-7. 
 
 » Martin v. Crow, 22 U. C. R. 485. 
 
S.UiES OF LAND — DESCRIPTION. 
 
 87 
 
 tween the grantees of the Crown, or those claiming under 
 them, it is necessary to have regard not only to the lan- 
 guage of the grants, but to the actual work on the ground, 
 if the same can be traced.* If there be no work on the 
 ground, the plan as adopted may be held to govern ; but 
 where there is work on the ground, and the latter is incon- 
 sistent with the plan, the work on the ground must govern.' 
 If the plan and the grant conflict, it may be that the grant 
 would be in some measure controlled by the plan, but where 
 both agree, and there is no evidence of work on the ground, 
 effect must be given to the grant according to the descrip- 
 tion therein contained, so far as the same can be traced on 
 the ground.' 
 
 The description in the grant may be so worded as to be 
 entirely controlled by the plan.* All lands are supposed to 
 be actually surveyed, and the intention of the grant, unless 
 the contrary plainly appear, must be held to convey the 
 land according to the actual survey."" If a survey has been 
 made but inaccurately, and there be no evidence of work on 
 the gi'ound, the inaccurate survey must yield to a subse- 
 quent accurate one, for in law the angles of a lot must be 
 considered to be ascertainable with mathematical certainty." 
 Where the question is as to the construction of a particular 
 grant from the Crown, other grants from the Crown may be re- 
 ceived to assist in the construction.' But where the con- 
 struction of the first grant is clear, a subsequent grant can- 
 not be allowed to control it.' 
 
 ' DuHii V. Turner. 3 U. C. R. 104; Carrick v. Johnsi-m, 26 U. C. R. O9; 
 Sinith V. Cleinas ct al., 20 C. P. 213. 
 
 = Carrick v. Johnson, 26 U. C. R. 69; luson ct al. v. Reynolds, 34 U. C. 
 R. 174. 199- 
 i McEachern v. Somcrvlllc, 37 U. C. R. 609, 620. 
 
 ♦ ODonncll v. Tiernan, 35 U. C. R. 181. 
 
 ■; Martin v. Crozv, 22 U. C. R. 485 ; McGregor v. McMichael, 41 U. C. 
 R. 128. 
 
 * Thibaiidcau v. Skead, 39 U. C. R.387 ; Forsyth v. Boyle, 28 C. V. 26, 33. 
 
 ? Clark V. Bonny Castle, 3 O. S. 528. 
 
 8 Davis et al. v. McPherson, 33 U. C. R. 376; Martin v. Crow. 22 U. C. 
 R. 485; Harrison v. Frost, 34 U. C. R. no. 
 
88 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 li;: 
 
 If a lot bo granted by a certain name, and it be clearly 
 shewn what the lot so named contains, the lot so named is 
 the governing feature in the description.' 
 
 Where a particular description is given, as by metes and 
 bounds, and the latter is inconsistent with the description of 
 the lot so named in the grant, the particular description 
 must be set aside." 
 
 Every survev different from the Crown survey must be 
 registered in the proper registry oftice, and all instruments 
 affecting that land, or any part thereof, executed after such 
 plan is liled with the registrar, must conform thereto, other- 
 wise they shall not be registered.* 
 
 It is best always, unless when a new survey' has been 
 made, to describe the parcels the same as in the former 
 title deeds ; and even when a subsequent plan has altered 
 the description, a reference may be made to former descrip- 
 tions, "but without specifying the deeds in which they are 
 so described" as the occupants/ It is not usual or desir- 
 able in this Province to draw a map or plan of the property 
 on the deed. Shoulil the plan prove inaccurate, it may 
 override the portions of the deed inconsistent with it.'' 
 
 The modern doctrine, in interpreting the meaning of a 
 grant or other instrument, is to ascertain the surrounding 
 facts at the time the same was made"; Init no convevancer 
 should trust to the action of the court in deciding what 
 parcels he wishes to include in his deed. Of two descrip- 
 tions in the same deed, a specific description given clearly 
 will govern a general one preceding it, even if different lots 
 are in question"; but a particular description, clearly 
 inaccurate in many respects, does not control a previous 
 
 / 
 
 ' Ili-r V. Xoliui. 21 U. C. R. 309, 319. 
 
 ^ Jamiesou v. McColltan. iS U. C. R. 445; Wiirlc v. Stc-:ca}-t.2S U. C. R. 
 427; GilU'ii V. Hayncs, 33 U. C. R. 51G; Hayncs v. Gillen, 21 Grant 15. 
 
 ' R. S. O., cap. Ill, sec. 82. 
 
 * Deane Con. 335. 
 
 5 Lylc V. Richards. L. R. i, H. L. 22 
 Chy. 410. 
 
 ' KoUvi V. F<).v, 15 C. P. 5''5. 
 
 7 Doc d. Murray v. Siiiifh, 5 Q. 13., 225; Llcxyllcn v. jfcrscy, 11 M. & 
 \V. I S3. 
 
 Davis V. Slu-pf^ard. L. R. i 
 
SALES OF LAND — EASEMENTS. 
 
 89 
 
 / 
 
 grant so as to exclude the part of that lot not described.' 
 On the other hand, a general description being wholly 
 insufficient, the particular description by metes and bounds 
 that followed and was complete in itself, is allowed to 
 
 govern 
 
 Boundary to one chain of a river means to the edge of 
 the water, not of the top of the bank '; and high water mark 
 is the highest ordinary state of the river on an average.' 
 
 VII. EASE^IENTS. 
 
 An easement is a privilege which the owner of one neigh- 
 bouring tenement has of another, existing in respect of their 
 several tenements, l)y which that other is obliged to suffer, 
 or not to do something on his own land for the advantage 
 of the possessor of the easement.' Easements and appur- 
 tenances legally belonging to land pass with it without any 
 express words of grant,'' and no amount of verbiage, so 
 common in this part of conveyances, will convey any ease- 
 ment not already legally belonging to it. The rule recom- 
 mended is to word the clause generally, without specifying 
 any particular rights or easements ; since otherwise the 
 accidental omission of any of them might prevent its pass- 
 ing by the conve\'ance.' 
 
 An agreement to grant an easement will not necessarily 
 be for an easement in perpetuity." In Kerr v. Corilnll," the 
 passing of easements under the Short Forms Act is con- 
 sidered. A water-cour.^e, having its origin c.r Jnrr ii'ituru, 
 and not from grant or prescription, is not extinguished by 
 unity of possession; but this is not the case with a right 
 
 ' jfaincson \\ McCuHiiiii. iS Q. li. 445. 
 
 ' Hart V. Bou'ii. 10 Chy. 266. 
 
 3 Stanton v. WintlccU, 1 y. B. 30. 
 
 > Phimb V. McGannon. 32 Q. 15. S. 
 
 ■^ Gale on Easements, i. 
 
 ^ Coli'frruvi: v. Dins Santus, 3 Dow. tS; K. 255. 
 
 ' Halliday v. Dcnison, 4 Jur. N. S. 1002 ; also Hayes on Con , page 209. 
 
 ^ Ct-a't!; V. Crtiiff, 2 App. 583. 
 
 9 25 Chy. 179. 
 
90 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 of way, except a right of way of necessity, as a way to 
 market or church.' 
 
 Prior to our Statute of 1880' an easement would be 
 legitimated in twenty years, if aifecting private property, 
 and not a nuisance." 
 
 See Biirnham v. Garvay,* as to the law on prescriptive 
 rights before the enactment referred to. 
 
 An easement can only be granted by deed ; one given by 
 parol cannot be revoked at any time.' The nature of its 
 enjoyment is determined throughout by its character at the 
 time of the grant.* 
 
 IX. HABENDUM. 
 
 Us.: 
 
 To have and to hold. The habendum part is intended to 
 define the estate of the purchaser ; its proper office is to 
 limit, explain and qualify the words in the premises, pro- 
 vided it be not contradictory or repugnant to them.' It 
 determines the estate as either the same, or less, as stated 
 in the grant, but it never gives a greater estate. Care must 
 be taken that the grant corresi)ond with the habendum, 
 and lire versa ; as if an estate in fee bo contained in the 
 grant, then restrictive words in the habendum may be re- 
 garded as a limitation, and, if repugnant to the grant, void." 
 If inconsistent with the grant, the former also governs.* 
 AMiere, in an assignment, the granting part of the deed 
 mentions only the indenture, the estate will pass if it be 
 mentioned in the habendum.^" 
 
 In a recent case, where the habendum was in fee, and the 
 grant otherwise regular, a proviso was inserted at the end 
 
 ' Jury V. Pigott. Poph. i66. 
 
 " Rcgituj V. Brewster, 8 C. P. 208. See Kerr v. Coghill, 25 Chy. 179; 
 Mykel V. Doyle. 45 Q. B. 65. 
 
 5 Ont. Stat.. 43 Vic, cap. 14. 
 * 27 Chancery, So. 
 5 Crysl r v. Creighton, E. T. 2 Vic. 
 Hej ird v. jfackson, 21 Chy. 263. 
 ' De ne Con. 337. 
 
 ^ Doe d. Meyers v. Marsh, 9 Q. B. 242. 
 9 Oxvston V. Williams, 16 Q. B. 405. 
 It Doe d. Woods V. Fox, 3 Q. B. 134. 
 
SALES OF LAND — HAI5ENDUM. 
 
 91 
 
 of the deed declaring that, nevertheless, the grantee shall 
 have no right to soil, alien or dispose of tho property, but 
 that he is to have the use during his life, and his children 
 after his death ; this was held to be repugnant and void." 
 Under a conveyance of land to AI. to hold during her natural 
 life, then to go to her heirs equally alike, and then to her 
 heirs and assigns forever, M. took a fee under the rule in 
 Shelley's case.' 
 
 It is difficult to see why, in the printed form of deeds, the 
 habendum is retained under the statutory form s. For the 
 ordinary transfer, the use of it is quite unnecessary and un- 
 authorized by the statute ; and if the Legislature thought it 
 necessary, it would have been inserted in the form given in 
 the schedule. By R. S. O., cap. 08, sec. 2, all corporeal 
 hereditaments shall, as regards the immediate freehold, be 
 deemed to lie in gi'ant as well as in livery. The effect of 
 this word grant, is not, so far as regards the immediate 
 freehold, strengthened in any way by a hdhemlum. Indeed, 
 the use of the latter may give rise to difficulties where the 
 Act respecting short forms is to be construed along with the 
 statute of uses.' Of course, if the habendum is to limit the 
 estate, its use is obvious. 
 
 Whilst reversionary interests in freeholds pass by grant 
 at common law, freehold hereditaments in possession now 
 pass by virtue of this statute in the word grant, and require 
 no further limitations to transmute the possession. The 
 statutory conveyance seems to pass the legal estate in the 
 first instance by virtue of the word grant, just as a con- 
 veyance at common law would do. A grant to A., to the 
 use of B., under the statute of uses, gives the legal estate to 
 B., and any subsequent use was a use upon a use or a trust. 
 But a bargain and sale to A. or a grant unto and to the use 
 of A., gave A. the legal estate, and any subsequent use was 
 a trust. Now, does our statute operate as a bargain and 
 sale, or is the word grant efficacious enough to convey the 
 legal estate without the doctrine of a use raised by a con- 
 
 ■ Lario v. Walker, 28 Chy. 216. 
 
 2 Brown O'Dtvyer, 35 Q. B. 354. 
 
 3 See Judgment of Proudfoot, V.C, in Seaton v. Ltmncy, 27 Chy. 174. 
 
■-Ip 
 
 92 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 s 
 
 
 sideration presumed and then effected ? The writer ap- 
 prehends that it does not operate as a barf];ain and sale, 
 because, strictly, in this species of conveyance, the use must 
 ])e executed in the grantee, and no other limitation could 
 consistently follow.* A bargain and sale excludes the idea 
 of a trust ; the property can only be held by the bargainee 
 as it was paid for by him. No hdhcndmn can interfere with 
 his estate to the extent of his purchase money, and that can 
 be limited in the conveying part. The object is to convey 
 the legal and beneficial interest at one stroke. 
 
 Our statutory deed, or any deed taking effect under the 
 statute declaring that all incorporeal hereditament shall be 
 deemed to lie in grant as well as in livery, is not reduced 
 to this construction, either by the statute of Uses, or the 
 doctrine of the Court of Chancery regarding uses raised on 
 a consideration. The obvious use of the statute is to con- 
 vey the legal e^^tate, leaving any trusts to be declared by 
 hubfnduni or otherwise. Unless for this purpose, it is not 
 easy to see why the rather inelegant language of the ordin- 
 ary hahemhim should be used in deeds of ordinary con- 
 veyance. 
 
 It was certainly not intended by the framers of our Acts 
 to render the word grant so inflexible that it would make a 
 conveyance, made in pursuance of it, incapable of being 
 used as a trust instrument. It is submitted that a statutory 
 grant to A. gives A. the legal estate ; and a statutory grant 
 to A., to the use of B., gives 13. the legal estate under the 
 statute of uses. (See ante Grant and Feoffment.) 
 
 X. COVENANTS. 
 
 No precise form of words is necessary to constitute a 
 covenant. The words in a contract under seal, " I will be 
 answerable," or " I will be accountable to A. for £10," or 
 " I am content to give A. £10 at Michaelmas," amount to 
 a covenant to pay the money.'' 
 
 • See Gamble v. Rccs, 6 U. C. R. 396. 
 " Addison on Contracts, 922. 
 
SALES OP LAND — COVENANTS. 
 
 98 
 
 Ami recitals in a deed will amount to a covenant, uiion 
 which an action of covenant may ho maintained, whciu it 
 appears to he the intention of the parties that they should 
 do so.' But a recital does not necessarily imply a covenant, 
 and whether it does so or not, in each case, depends on what 
 is to he collected as the intention of the parties from the 
 whole instrument.^ 
 
 A cov'Dnant must be express and distinct, and not 
 gathered as arisin*^ consequentially or morally by reason of 
 something; else in the deed * ; and in an agreement under 
 seal, if the vendor agrees to convey to the purchaser land 
 for a fixed sum, payable in a specified manner, it has l)een 
 held to amount to a covenant to pay the money .^ But 
 where the proviso of a mortgage had only the words, " in 
 three equal payments to be respectively made," this did not 
 create a covenant to pay the amounts specified*; and it ap- 
 pears that an action of covenant cannot be maintained on 
 tlic proviso in a mortgage deed." 
 
 Usual covenants in a conveyance to a purchaser extend 
 only to the acts of a vendor, if he himself is a purchaser for 
 value ; if he take by descent, to the acts of himself and his 
 ancestors ; and if by devise, to himself and his devisor." 
 
 Where the purchaser gives back a mortgage, it would 
 seem that the covenants in the deed and mortgage should 
 be of the same character.' 
 
 Where the vendor is the legal and equitable owner, he is 
 required to enter into full covenants ; and where he has 
 acquired this property from his ancestors, then he cove- 
 nants for their acts, as well as for his own, in so far as such 
 may be necessary. It extends to his right to convey, which 
 is the first covenant referred to, but the usual covenant 
 
 ' Lay V. Mottrain, 19 C. B. N. S. 479. 
 ^ Ivens V. Elwcs, 24 L. J., Chy. 249. 
 3 Liddcll V. Mtinro, 4 Q. B. 474. 
 ■• Berry v. Garrard, 32 Q. B. 173. 
 5 Jackson V. Yeomans, 19 C. P. 394. 
 ' T. T., 3 Vic. 
 
 ^ Gamble v. McKay, 7 C, P. 319. 
 8 McKay v. Reed, i Chy. Cha. 208. 
 
94 
 
 PRACTICAIi CONVEYANCING. 
 
 •I' 
 
 othorwiRe h that no acts of his have affected hiH right to 
 convey.' 
 
 1. Title. The henefit of the covenants for title runs 
 with the land, whether freehold or leasehold,* and every 
 ahsolute owner is hound to enter into them on the sale of 
 his property*; aiu\ it would seem, in England, that a hus- 
 band is hound to do so on the sale of his wife's real estate, 
 though not when it is held to her separate use. 
 
 The covenants for title should always be entered into 
 with the grantee to uses, as otherwise they will not run with 
 the land in case of the power of appointment being exer- 
 cised.' 
 
 On a sale of freehold estate, the usual covenants for title 
 are : — The right to convey, for quiet enjoyment, for freedom 
 from encumbrances, and for further assurances ; and under 
 these, the purchaser, in case of eviction, may recover the 
 value of the land, and also of houses which he had built 
 thereon subsequently to his purchase.'* 
 
 Our statute distinguishes, by two covenants, encumbrances 
 subsisting on the property, and those created by the ven- 
 dor, and adds a covenant as to production of title deeds 
 and a general release, which latter seems to be superfluous. 
 
 The covenant in statutory conveyances, that the grantor 
 has a right to convey the lands, is not an absolute covenant, 
 as in statutory mortgages. 
 
 2. Quiet Possession . The second covenant is the one 
 for quiet possession, the effect of which is, not to protect 
 the purchaser against all molestation, but only against all 
 persons claiming, lawfully or equitably, under the vendor 
 — a guarantee that the purchaser may use the property in 
 any way that the vendor might have used it. 
 
 • Deane on Conveyancing, 338. Note the addition that can be made to 
 this covenant under Direction 4 in Schedule B. of the Act. 
 
 => Riddel V. Riddel, 7 Sim. 729 ; Campbell v. Le7vis. 3 B. & Aid. 392 ; 
 Deane on Conveyancing, 339. 
 
 i Church v. Brown, 15 Ves. 258-263; note Deane Con. 340. 
 
 4 Sugden Ven. & Pur., Chap. XVI., sec. i, page 578. 
 
 s Bunney v. Hopkinson, 27 Beav. 565. 
 
BALEH OF LAND — COVENANTS. 
 
 96 
 
 The full covenant for quiet enjoyment and freetlom from 
 encumbrances is not controlled by the restrictive words 
 preceding the earlier covenants.' A public highway is 
 apparently not an encumbrance within the covenant for 
 quiet enjoyment,' but arrears of taxes due at the time of 
 sale — at the date of the conveyance — are within the cove- 
 nant for quiet enjoyment.* Sewerage rate, imposed by by- 
 law, is a personal charge on the owner, and is not a tax on 
 tlie land, so as to create a right of action under this cove- 
 nant.* Where the rate is not struck at the date of the 
 conveyance — as between the assessment and before the 
 rating — there was held to be no breach of covenant that 
 the property was free from arrears of taxes, as there was no 
 payment in default, the taxes could not be paid until they 
 were ascertained.* 
 
 An undischarged mortgage, if satisfied by payment, may 
 not afford a ground of action.* 
 
 A tortious disturbance by a stranger is not a breach of 
 this covenant, unless the covenant is against disturbance 
 by a particular person, when it is sufficient to shew any 
 disturbance by him, whether by lawful title or otherwise.' 
 In England, it is said that a claim of dower by the vendor's 
 wife is a breach of this covenant * ; but it is no breach that 
 the covenantor's wife is alive, and has not barred her 
 dower"; and it seems that, if the wife survive her husband, 
 an action on the covenant for further assurance will only 
 lie upon tender and refusal of an effectual conveyance to 
 pass her estate." 
 
 • VVallbridge v. Everett, 22 C. P. 28. 
 ' Moore v. Boulton, 10 Q. B. 140. 
 
 J Haynes v. Smith, 11 Q. B. 57. 
 
 ♦ Moore v. Hynes, 22 Q. B. 107. 
 Corbett v. Taylor, 23 Q. B. 454. 
 Kennedy v. Solomon, 14 Q. B. 623. 
 Nash V. Palmer, 5 M. & S. 374. 
 Godb. 333 ; Palm. 340. 
 
 9 Boivtr V. Brass, E. T. 5 Vic. 
 
 ■■^ Hoyt V. Widdificld. 5 Q. B. 180; Dack v. Currtc, 12 Q B. 334; Wilson 
 V. Biggar, 26 Q. B. 85. 
 
90 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 cr: 
 
 3. Free from Encumbrancea. Then follow'8 the 
 covenant that tho propoity is free from any encumbrances 
 created l)y tho vendor, or through, or in trust for him, or 
 by any of his ancestors, in case tlie vendor himself acquires 
 tlio projierty by descent. It is not a covenant that there 
 are no encuml)rance8, but tliat the purchaser will not bo 
 disturbed by any encumbrancer.' 
 
 Where tho equity of redemption is sold, subject to a 
 mortgage, the mortgagor, in case he covenanted for pay- 
 ment of tho debt, becomes surety of the purchaser for the 
 payment of the mortgage debt ; and, if the same is allowed 
 to run into default, he can call upon the party as to whom 
 he stands in the relation of surety, his assignee, to pay the 
 debt.' 
 
 This covenant, under the Act, does not, in deeds of grant, 
 include all arrears of taxes and assessments, as the corre- 
 sponding covenant in mortgages. 
 
 As to the right of a purchaser under an agreement to pay 
 off existing encumbrances, see Stammers v. O'Donohoc:' 
 In that case Mr. Boyd, the present Chancellor, said : — 
 
 " The plaintiff is entitled to have this mortgage paid off 
 or discharged before he need accept a conveyance from the 
 defendant. Th^ money in court may be applied j^ro tanto 
 to satisfy the encumbrance." 
 
 The covenant, also, in the statutory forms, that the 
 grantor himself has done no act to encumber, may be re- 
 ferred to in connexion with the present one. It is the 
 covenant given by trustees and others, who do not warrant 
 the title, except as to their own acts. 
 
 4. Further Assurance. The vendor covenants for 
 further assurance ; and on behalf of his ancestors also, in case 
 he acquires the property by descent. This covenant refers 
 to perfecting the property to the purchaser, doing anything 
 that may be reasonably required for that purpose. The 
 
 » As to concealing an encumbrance, see Lovelace v. Harrington, 27 Chy. 
 178. 
 « Campbell v. Robinson, 27 Chy. 634. 
 3 29 Grant 64. This case is in appeal. 
 
BALES OF LAND — COVENANTS. 
 
 97 
 
 )l* 
 
 rs 
 
 g 
 ie 
 
 pL>rfi'ctin|]; of the title is to he nt tlie expense of the pur- 
 chaser. It HeeniH thnt, if a wife Burvive her hushand, an 
 action on this covenant will only lie upon tender and refusal 
 of an effectual conveyance to pass her estate.' 
 
 Under this covenant the purchaser cannot require a 
 covenant for the production of title deeds'; hut, a purchaser 
 who has delivered up all the deeds to a purchaser of part of 
 the lands, may require the covenantors to execute a dupli- 
 cate conveyance.' 
 
 5. Production. A purchaser is not compellable to rely 
 on the equitable right to compel production of the deeds, 
 but may require a valid covenant for their production.* 
 The purchaser is either entitled to this or to the deeds them- 
 selves'; and it is settled in England that apurchaser neglect- 
 ing to take such covenant has an equity against his vendor 
 (not grounded on the covenant for further assurance,) to en- 
 force production of the deeds, although he cannot, it seems, 
 compel the execution of a deed of covenant to produce.*' 
 But now, by our Revised Statute, cap. 109, the inability of 
 the vendor to furnish the purchaser with a legal covenant 
 to produce and furnish copies of documents of title, shall 
 not be an objection to the title in case the purchaser will, 
 on the completion of the contract, have an equitable right 
 to the production of such documents. The covenant should 
 extend, not only to deeds, but to all the instruments of title 
 not delivered up to the purchaser.' A vendor, unless some 
 special ground be laid for it, is never called upon to prove 
 the execution of his title deeds." 
 
 If, on a sale of land, the vendor retains the deeds in re- 
 spect of the unsold portion, and at the same time enters into 
 
 ■ IVilson V. Biggar, 26 Q. B. 85. 
 
 - Hallet V. Middleton, i Russ. 243. 
 
 ' Napper v. Allington, i Eq. Cas. Ab. 166, D. 4. 
 
 4 Sug. V. & P. C. II. S. 6. page 452. 
 
 5 Barclay v. Raine, 1 Sim. & S. 449. 
 
 ^ Hayes on Con., and cases therein referred to, pages 164, 1C5, 166. 
 
 ^ As to documents of which the purchaser is not entitled to copies, see 
 Sug. V. & P. Chap. II. See infra. 
 
 ^ Sug. V. & P. 438. 
 
 o's.c. 7 
 
 00 
 
 
 3 ^O 
 
98 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVP]YANCING. 
 
 a covenant for their production to the purchaser, and after- 
 wards sells the remainder of the property, the second pur- 
 chaser would he entitled to the deeds, but he may be re- 
 quired by the vendor to enter into a covenant with him to 
 perform the covenant for production.^ 
 
 The grantor is relieved of this covenant by fire or other 
 inevitable accident. Production is allowed at any trial or 
 hearing in any actioi or suit at law or in equity, or other 
 judicature, or otherwise. 
 
 6. Release all Claims. The clause in the short forms 
 Act to the effect that the vendor releases to the vendee all 
 his clains upon the said lands, cannot be said to be of any 
 special value, and has been declared to be simply useless. 
 It is said to be omitted in England in assurances made in 
 pursuance of powers of appointments.* 
 
 
 X. DOWER. 
 
 Where a party agrees to convey property, he is bound to 
 do so free from dower; or, if the wife will not release her 
 dower, then to convey subject thereto, with an abatement 
 in the purchase money.^ Her right to dower is, during her 
 husband's life, only a nominal encumbrance, still the pur- 
 chaser is entitled to have it removed, or to have the con- 
 tract specifically performed, with an abatement in the pur- 
 chase money.* 
 
 If there is a regular bar of dower in the deed, and both 
 husband and wife execute it, this is sufficient, though the 
 husband only is a formal party "; but where the wife signed 
 a deed containing no bar of dower, that of itself would be 
 insufficient.* 
 
 ■ Dart on V. & P. 362. 
 
 - Deane Con. 337. 
 
 ' Kendrew v. Shcwan, 4 Chy. 578. 
 
 * Van Norman v. Beaupre, 5 Chy. 599. 
 
 '' Bonter v. Northcote, 20 C. P. 76. 
 
 *> Thompson v. Thompson, 2 Chy. Cha. 211. 
 
SALES OF LAND — DOWER. 
 
 99 
 
 loth 
 Itbe 
 Hed 
 be 
 
 Where, in a suit for specific performance, the wife refuses 
 to join in the conveyance to bar dower, the i^roper mode of 
 protecting the purchaser is to set aside a sufficient portion 
 of the purchase money to indemnify him against the claim 
 for dower in the event of the wife subsequently becoming 
 entitled thereto by surviving her husband ; the interest, 
 during the joint lives of the vendor and his wife, to be paid 
 to him, and also the principal so set aside on her decease.* 
 
 In regard to the rather difficult subject of dower, the 
 conveyancer must consider whether the wife is entitled, and 
 how her dower can be barred in case she is so entitled. 
 
 As to who are entitled, the following cases will answer 
 most of the questions on the former point. The general 
 rule is, of course, that Avherever a husband has an estate 
 in fee his wife is entitled to dower out of it. 
 
 The widow of an alien naturalized is entitled to dower,^ 
 and if her husband has been seized of tlie land during his 
 lifetime she is also entitled.' But the wife of a mortgagee 
 is not entitled'; nor where her husband's lands are sold for 
 taxes." Tlie wife of a tenant in common may be endowed," 
 and a wife may be entitled to dower out of lands where the 
 patent never issued and though all the purchase money had 
 not been paid,' as being equitably entitled, and it makes no 
 difference whether the parties were married before or after 
 the Act— 4 Will. IV.^ 
 
 A sale under an execution against the husband's estate 
 does not bar the wife's dower,* but a sale for taxes does.'" 
 
 Skinner V. Ainsworth, 24 Chy. 148; 
 White V. Laing, 2 C. P. 186. 
 Davenport v. Davenport, 7 C. P. 401. 
 Ham V. Ham, 14 Q. B. 497. 
 Tomlinson v. Hill, 5 Chy. 231. 
 Ham V. Ham, 14 Q. B. 497. 
 Craig V. Templeton, 8 Chy. 483. 
 Mcintosh V. Wood, 15 Chy. 92. 
 Walker v. Powers, M. T. 4 Vic. 
 Tomlinson v. Hill, 5 Chy. 231. 
 
 Longhead v. Stubbs, 27 Chy. 387. 
 
 09 
 
 00 
 
 C 
 
 s 
 
 s 
 
 ft iS 
 
 ' s 
 
 a 
 
100 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 '< 
 
 r 
 
 'x 
 
 
 On the death of one of two joint tenants during their 
 joint seisin, the title passes to the other joint tenant free 
 from the dower of the deceased tenant's widow/ 
 
 If the husband is seised of an estate in fee, her right to 
 dower attaches — so a purchaser's wife, though he gave a 
 mortgage back to secure a portion of the purchase money.' 
 
 Dower may be previously released, or the wife may be 
 disentitled, so that her joining the deed may be unneces- 
 sary. 
 
 "Where a right of dower is released by an instrument 
 separate from the conveyance by the husband, an exami- 
 nation and certificate are still necessary,' though, where a 
 Vesting Order was used by the j)urchaser, a separate deed 
 by the wife was sufficient without such formalities.* 
 
 1. Marriage Settlement. Where a marriage settle- 
 ment intends to convey certain property to a wife so as to 
 bar her dower in her husband's lands, it must appear that 
 such settlement was to be in lieu of dower*; and where the 
 parties were from Lower Canada, it has been held, that un- 
 less mention were made in the settlement or marriage con- 
 tract of the lands in this Province owned by the husband, 
 it would not operate as a bar to these.* 
 
 2. Election. Under a will expressly declaring that 
 what is given to the widow is intended to be in lieu of dower, 
 the widow is bound by her election, both in law and equity' ; 
 and where she elects to take an annuity in lieu of dower, 
 she is not entitled to dower out of any of the testator's lands, 
 whether devised or not.* In an exchange, she must elect to 
 take from one or the other of the lands given and taken — 
 she cannot get dower out of both.' 
 
 ' Haskill V. Frazcr, 12 C. P. 383. 
 
 - Lynch v. O'Hara, 6 C. P. 259. 
 
 ^ Bogart V. Paterson, 14 Chy. 624. 
 
 •• Heward v. Scott, 2 Chy. Cha. 274. 
 
 5 Gilkison v. Elliott. 27 Q. B. 95. 
 
 « Jamicson v. Fisher, 2 E. & A. 242 ; 12 C. P. 6oi. 
 
 7 Walton V. Hill, 8 Q. B. 562. 
 
 ^ Davidson v. Boomer, 18 Chy. 475. 
 
 3 McLellan v. Meggat, 7 Q. B. 554 ; White v. Laing, 2 C. P. i86. 
 
SALES OF LAND — DOWER. 
 
 101 
 
 Dower may be barred by accepting devises or bequests, 
 and electing to take them in lieu of dower,' and she will be 
 called to elect in lands given and taken in exchange, to take 
 one or the other.^ 
 
 3. Adultery. If a wife voluntarily lives apart from her 
 husband, in adultery, she is deprived of dower ^ ; but a wife 
 abandoned by her husband, and subsequently guilty of adul- 
 tery, is not barred from dower.* 
 
 4. Alimony. Unless a wife is disentitled to alimony, no 
 order will be made to convey free from dower,* or where she 
 has left her husband, and has expressed her determination 
 never to return to reside with him.^ 
 
 Where the wife lives apart from her husband for over 
 two years, under such circumstances as would disentitle 
 her to alimony, a judge of a High Court may, if the hus- 
 band desire to sell ' or mortgage * the place, make an order 
 which will bar her dower ; and where the wife is a lunatic, 
 the judge can also make an order equivalent to bind her as 
 if she could duly execute a bar of dower. See chap, on 
 Mortgages, Dower. 
 
 5. "Wild Lands. Do ,ver is not recoverable out of an}'^ 
 separate or distinct piece of land, which at the time of 
 alienation by the husband, or at the time of his death, if 
 he died seized thereof, was in a state of nature, and unim- 
 proved by clearing, fencing, or otherwise, for the purposes of 
 cultivation or occupation. R. S. 0., cap. 126, sec. 3 ; and 
 see R. S. 0., cap. 55, sec. 35. 
 
 XI. SUBSEQUENT MATTERS. 
 
 After a conveyance of land has been drawn and executed 
 by the parties, affidavits necessary for registration sworn 
 
 ' Walton V. Hill, 8 Q. B. 562. 
 « White V. Laing. 2 C. P. 186. 
 
 ^ Neffv. Thompson, 20 C. P. 211 ; Worsley v. Finch, 20 C. P. 132. 
 ■» Graham v. Law, 6 C. P. 310. 
 5 Re Eagles, 7 P. R. 241. 
 <" Re Campbell, 25 Chy. 187. 
 7 R. S. O., cap. 126; 44 Vic, Ont. cap. 14. 
 Ont. Stat., 44 Vic, cap. 14. 
 
 2 
 
 00 
 
 C 
 ft c 
 
 I 
 
 a 
 
 n 
 
 
 
 s 
 
 3 
 
102 
 
 PRACTICAL COKV'EYANCING. 
 
 m 
 
 to, and the deeds registered, there may yet remain some 
 points to which attention may be directed. There is the 
 question of the pm'chase money and interest thereon, if no 
 mortgage be taken back, and the lien of the vendor for un- 
 paid purchase money ; the taking possession of the property 
 sold : the custody of the title deeds and the cost of the 
 transfer. 
 
 2. Vendor's Lien. The general rule of law as to a 
 vendor's lien is laid down in the leading case of Mackrcth 
 V. Sijnwns^ as follows : — 
 
 1. A vendor's lien for unpaid i^urchase money, unless 
 relinquished, exists against all persons except purchasers 
 for valuable consideration without notice, having the legal 
 estate. 
 
 2. Another security taken and relied on may, according to 
 its nature, and the circumstances under which it is taken, be 
 evidence of relinquishment, but the proof is on the purchaser. 
 
 In our own Courts it has been decided, that, taking a 
 mortgage for part of the purchase money, destroys the lien 
 as to the balance of it," and also for the remainder 
 unsecured*; but taking notes from the vendee, and his 
 surety is no waiver* — not even where a bond is given with 
 a third person as surety.* It would a^jpear that where 
 notes only are given the lien is not lost, unless by express 
 agreement that there is to be none " ; and the lien is not 
 lost by the amount being turned into a judgment.' But 
 now by statute in all deeds executed since the 18th of 
 September, 1865, there is no lien on the land for unpaid 
 purchase money ; and no equitable lien, charge or interest 
 shall be deemed valid in any court in this Province as 
 
 ' 15 Ves. 329. 
 
 = Drijffil V. McFall, 41 Q. B. 313. 
 
 1 Anderson v. Trott, 19 Chy. 619. 
 
 * Mitchell V. McGaffey, 6 Chy. 361. 
 ? Sherman v. Par sill, 18 Chy. 8. 
 
 * McDonald v. McDonald, 16 Chy. 678. 
 ? Flint V. Smith. 8 Chy. 339. 
 
SALES OF LAND — SUBSEQUENT MATTERS. 
 
 103 
 
 against a registered instrument executed by the same party, 
 his heirs or assigns/ 
 
 2. Interest, Costs, etc. Interest on the pm-chase 
 money runs from the date when, after the acceptance of 
 the title, the purchaser could have safely taken possession ; 
 and a difficulty respecting his conveyance may justify his 
 not taking possession.* If the purchaser takes possession 
 before conveyance, he is liable to interest from the time of 
 taking possession.' And the purchaser is entitled to all 
 the rents and profits arising from the estate purchased, 
 which accrue due subsequent to the time when he becomes 
 such purchaser.* 
 
 A purchaser, by taking a conveyance or vesting order, 
 waives all objections to the title, and also takes upon him- 
 self the responsibility of obtaining possession ; and, if 
 evicted by a title to which his covenants do not extend, he 
 has no right to compensation on that account.* 
 
 All deeds relating exclusively to the property sold must 
 be delivered up to the purchaser * ; but, when the property 
 is sold in lots, the pm'chaser for the most value is entitled 
 to their custody, but he must covenant with the other 
 owners for their production.' Except such deeds as are not 
 of record, the vendor must supply attested copies at his own 
 expense * ; but the vendor may limit his liability in these 
 matters, by setting it out in the agreement or conditions of 
 sale.' Where a vendor takes a mortgage back, he is, of 
 com'se, entitled to retain all the title deeds. 
 
 In the absence of stipulation, a vendor is bound to pro- 
 duce, at his own expense, the originals of all deeds and 
 
 •-See Registry Act, R. S. O., cap. in, sec. Si. 
 
 - Rae V. Geddes. 3 Chy. Cha. 404. 
 
 "' Great Western Railway Co. v. Jones, 13 Cliy. 355. 
 
 * Brady v. Keenan, 6 P. R. 262. 
 
 5 Btill V. Harper, 7 P. R. 36. 
 
 ' Parr v. Lovegrove, 4 Drew, 182. 
 
 ' Prideaux Con. 204. 
 
 8 Dart, 676. 
 
 ' BroughtoH V. Jewel, 15 Ves. 176. 
 
104 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 other instruments necessary to verify Lhe abstract,' except 
 copies of such instruments as are upon record,* or have 
 been lost or destroyed'; and, as a general rule, the vendor 
 pays for the abstract.* He must also pay the expense of 
 comparing the abstract wit». the deeds should the title 
 prove bad — if this is done before the title is investigated * ; 
 but this practice is not recommended.* Unnecessary 
 searches are not allowed, even as between solicitor and 
 client.' 
 
 "Where there is no agreement to the contrary, the pur- 
 chaser prepares the conveyance at his own expense, and 
 tenders it for execution to the vendor,* who must procure 
 its execution by all parties, and incur whatever expense that 
 may entail.' 
 
 After a contract for sale is entered into, the estate in 
 equity vested in the purchaser, but a formal conveyance, is 
 necessary to get in the legal estate. 
 
 The purchaser is thus called upon to pay for his own 
 security, under the general rule to that effect. It may be 
 thought from this that a vendor who has his purchase 
 money secured by a mortgage, should pay for his own 
 security ; but a little reflection will shew that the mortgage 
 was taken to suit the convenience of the purchaser, and that 
 he should pay for this advantage. 
 
 » Berry v. Young, 2 Esp. 640. 
 
 => Cooper V. Emery, i Ph. 388. 
 
 3 Harvc; v. Phillips, -i Atk. 541. 
 
 •« Sug. 406, Dart, 280. 
 
 5 See Dart, 306. 
 
 * Dart, 500. 
 
 "' Langford v. Mahoncy, 3 J. & L. 97. 
 
 - Dart, 500. 
 
 i See Weiss v. Crafts, 6 P. R. 151. 
 
 Note.- -In connection with the Forms and Precedents for this chapter 
 (>Ci: , will be added a reference to particular grants, or grants under certain 
 btaiuies, such as Religious Institutions, Mechanics' Institutes, the Statutes 
 of Mortmain, etc., and the Rules and Regulations of the Free Grants of 
 Ontario. 
 
CHAPTER V. 
 
 LEASES. 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 II. Lessor's Title. 
 III. Leases — How made: 
 
 1. Agreements f»r Leases. 
 
 2. Void Leases as Agreements. 
 
 IV. Parol Leases: 
 
 1. Lessor's Obligations and 
 
 Rights. 
 
 2. Lessee's Obligations and 
 
 Rights. 
 
 V. Leases bv Deed : 
 
 1. Short Forms. 
 
 2. Habendum. 
 
 3. Reddendum. 
 
 VI. 
 
 VII. 
 
 4. Covenants. 
 
 (rt) Pay rents and taxes, 
 {b) Repair. 
 
 {c) Keep up fences. Not cut 
 
 down timber, 
 (d) Not assign, nor sublet, 
 {e) Quiet enjoyment. 
 
 5. Proviso for re-entry. 
 
 Determination ofTenaxcy : 
 
 1. Forfeiture. 
 
 2. Effluxion of time. 
 
 3. Notice. 
 
 4. Surrender. 
 
 Distress. 
 
 I. PRELIMINARY. 
 
 It must be remembered, in the preparation of a lease, 
 that a continuing limited relationship is to be provided for 
 between the parties, and that the lessor and lessee are 
 bound up, to some extent, in each other, for a determined 
 period. It is a sort of partnership of two, in which one 
 finds or contributes the capital, and the other works it. 
 But the dormant partner, in this case, runs little risk with 
 his tenant, and none at all with third persons. 
 
 In other transactions, as in sales or purchases, the parties 
 are disconnected after the sale is over. A lease, it is true, 
 is a sale of the interest in real or personal property, but 
 only for a determined period ; it is a loan of capital, invested 
 
106 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 in land, houses or other transferable property of that nature, 
 and after the period has elapsed, its use revests in the owner, 
 and the parties are disconnected again. The purchase 
 money for the sale, instead of being paid at once, is usually 
 paid at stated periods, and when the last payment is made, 
 the lessor gets back his property, nearly in the same con- 
 dition as when he leased it. 
 
 These two circumstances, of the periodical payments, and 
 the state of the property when the owner receives it back 
 again, form the two main features and difficulties of a lease ; 
 because, if the owner gets paid for the use of the property, 
 and gets it back intact, he has got all that he can expect. 
 To provide for these two things are the main objects in 
 drawing a lease. 
 
 There is, probably, no department in our law so well de- 
 fined, and so capable of a clear and satisfactory elucidation 
 or opinion, as the relation of landlord and tenant — the 
 relation which a lease creates. Nevertheless, though the 
 ground upon which it stands is clearly marked out by the 
 common and statute law, that ground itself is by no means 
 insignificant in proportions, nor to be comprehended with- 
 in a cursory glance. The portion of it indispensable to one 
 about to prepare a lease, will be referred to, within such 
 limits as are at the writer's disposal. 
 
 tl 
 
 tl 
 tl 
 
 s 
 
 a 
 tl 
 
 «»tiHi|i 
 
 llh-lt'M 
 
 II. THE LESSOR'S TITLE. 
 
 In this Province, leases have not the importance they 
 have in England, where the farming portion of the com- 
 munity are generally the lessees from large land-owners. 
 Nevertheless, the thorough investigation of the title to the 
 property about to be leased, is as important for the tenant, 
 comparatively, as if he were purchasing it out and out. 
 He buys it out and out only for a determined period it is 
 true, but that period is all-important for him. It is with 
 reference to that period that he retains a professional man 
 to see that he is protected. 
 
 Under an open agreement to grant or assign a lease, 
 the intended lessor or vendor is bound to produce and verify 
 
LEASES — THE LESSOR S TITLE. 
 
 107 
 
 the title,' unless there is a condition in the agreement that 
 the vendor shall not be bound to produce his title. Where 
 there was a condition that the lessor's title would not be 
 shewn and should not be enquired into, the purchaser was 
 precluded from raising any objection to the title, though the 
 lessors had no power of leasing the property.* A purchaser 
 of leaseholds should require the production of the last re- 
 ceipt for the rent, and should be careful to ascertain that 
 all the covenants in the lease have been performed up to 
 the date of the purchase. He should also examine the 
 lease, for the purpose of ascertaining that it is not an under- 
 lease, and that there is no other property comprised in the 
 lease to which the covenants and provisos extend.* An 
 assignee of a leasehold interest is not liable for the breach 
 of any of the covenants contained in the lease occurring 
 after he has executed an assignment of the lease to another 
 person ; so that if the vendor of a leasehold interest is not 
 the original lessee, but an assignee or the representative 
 of an assignee, he is not entitled to a covenant from the 
 purchaser for the payment of the future rent and the 
 future observance of the covenants, unless he, the vendor, 
 is under the obligation of a covenant for the payment and 
 observance of such rent and covenants.^ In the absence of 
 any express covenant, the original lessee has a legal right to 
 be indemnified by the holder of the lease, for the time being, 
 against breaches of covenant committed during his tenancy, 
 whether such holder takes by assignment directly from the 
 lessee or after mesne assignments.' 
 
 The next thing to be considered, after the title is traced 
 down to the lessor, is to see whether or not the property be 
 in mortgage. If so, the lessor has not the legal estate, and 
 in the absence of an express power or stipulation to that 
 effect in the mortgage, cannot grant a lease binding on the 
 mortgagee though it may be binding on himself. The consent 
 
 2 
 
 C 
 
 I 
 
 6'^ 
 
 I 
 
 ■ Stranks v. St. John, L. R. 2 C. P. 376 5ug. V. & P. 307. 
 
 - Hume V. Bentlcy, 5 De G. Sc Sm. 520. 
 
 3 Prideaux Con. 144. 
 
 * Moitle V. Garrett, L. R. 7 Ex. lor. 
 
 5 Prideaux Con. 236. 
 
108 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 of the mortgagee must be obtained, and the person to whom 
 the rent is to be paid clearly specified. The lessee will be 
 protected in paying the rent to the mortgagor, if he lease 
 from him, until he receives notice from the mortgagee to 
 pay it to him.' And neither can a mortgagee, properly 
 speaking, grant a lease, unless he has power to do so under 
 the mortgage deed, and then it ought to be granted strictly 
 within the power. It is said, that if the lease granted by a 
 mortgagee (without the consent of the mortgagor, of course,) 
 be a beneficial one to the estate, and for an ordinary term, 
 and such as a prudent man would gi'ant if the property 
 were his own, it would probably be supported in equity' ; but 
 the fact must not be lost sight of, that the mortgagor is en- 
 titled to have his estate restored to him, on payment of the 
 principal, interest and costs due his mortgagee, and should 
 not be bound by any lease to which he was not a con- 
 senting party. 
 
 Where the lessor himself holds under a lease, he may be 
 able to grant an underlease, unless the power of making 
 such underlease is expressly withheld from him. (See post.) 
 
 III. LEASES— HOW MADE. 
 
 cr:;:ii 
 
 *«i»i 
 
 A lease may be made by implication of law, by parol, by 
 writing, or by deed. As to the first of these, an ordinary 
 case is that of a tenancy at will, where the tenant remains 
 in possession and pays rent, and his estate, by implication 
 of law, becomes a tenancy from year to year. A lease cap- 
 able of being made by parol, and a lease in writing not by 
 deed are much on the same footing : where the law re- 
 quires a writing, the lease must be by deed, and where the 
 law does not, a writing is of no more efficacy than a verbal 
 agreement, except that a written document is more useful 
 as evidence in case of dispute. 
 
 Before the Statute of Frauds, any lease or agreement for 
 a lease of land might be by word of mouth. Since the 
 
 ■ Wilton V. Dunn, 15 Jur. 1104. 
 ^ Greenwood Con. 64. 
 
LKABKS — HOW MADE. 
 
 109 
 
 passing of that statute, only leases for three years or leas, 
 from the making thereof, and whereupon the rent reservcnl 
 (luring the term amounts to two-thirds at least the full 
 improved value of the thing demised, arc good without a 
 writing — without heing made hy deed. The two simple 
 conditions in determining if a written lease he necessary, 
 are : 
 
 1st. Is the term to be; three years or less from the 
 making ? 
 
 2nd. Is the rent, at least, two-thirds of the improved 
 value of the thing demised ? 
 
 The difficulty of proving satisfactorily the latter condition 
 will make it advisable, in all cases, to have a written lease 
 drawn, and it will be seen, presently, what advantages a 
 written lease has over a parol one. For the lessor, in a 
 parol lease, is not liable on any covenant, except that the 
 lessee will have quiet enjoyment of the property demised ' ; 
 as it is doubtful if he impliedly promises that he has a 
 good title to let. If the lessee wants any other covenant, 
 it must be reduced into writing. Again, if, by any oversight 
 or intention, the lease by word of mouth was not to take 
 effect at once, but reserved to begin at a future day, it is 
 void altogether. Neither party can enforce possession by 
 action or suit, and no action for rent will lie where no pos- 
 session was given — no tenancy created. These and other 
 kindred matters will be referred to presently.'- 
 
 1. Agreements for Leases. The next observation 
 is in regard to agreements for leases. 
 
 An agreement for a lease is recognized by the Statute of 
 Frauds, but every such agreement, no matter what the term 
 or the rent may be, must be in writing and signed by the 
 
 ' Hull V. City of London Brewery Co., 31 L. J. Q. B. 257. 
 
 - There is some conflict of authority as to whether or not in a parol 
 lease the lessor covenants for anything beyond quiet enjoyment to the 
 lessee. The case of Stranks v. St. John, L. R. 2 C. P. 376, is cited by 
 Mr. Hayes (Conveyancing, page 644), as authority that the lessor impliedly 
 promises he has a good title to let. Mr. Addison, Contracts 21, cites 
 Bandy v. Cartwright, 8 Ex. 913, and other cases to show there is no such 
 implied covenant. In Ball's Principles of Contracts (London, i88i), the 
 latter view is adopted. See infra, parol leases. 
 
 2 
 
 00 
 
 C 
 
 I 
 
 s 
 
110 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 CT".;!! 
 
 « 
 
 *h»iafii 
 
 party to be charged, or by his agent, authorized in writing 
 also. It is a curious anomaly in the law of leases, that an 
 agreement for a lease for, say, two years, and at the full 
 rental of the property demised, must be in writing, but the 
 lease itself need not be so — that the perfect security has 
 k'ss formality about it than the agreement which it merges. 
 
 As a matter of practice, however, it rarely happens that 
 any one draws up an agreement for a lease. The lease 
 itself is easier to draw up. Two suggestions in drawing up 
 an agreement for a lease are given' — one, that the lessee is 
 not to require investigation of his lessor's title ; and, secondly, 
 that the instrument is intended only as an agreement, 
 and does not pass any legal interest to the lessee. A third 
 may also be added in regard to the proportion of the costs 
 to be borne by the parties. 
 
 Unless the agreement contains all the covenants, it will 
 give rise to difficulty ; and if it declare that the lease is to 
 contain the '* usual " or proper covenants, there will be an- 
 other difficulty, in limiting the meaning of thtso words. 
 Usual covenants may be taKon to include to pay rent, to 
 pay taxes, to repair, and to allow lessor to enter and view 
 the state of repair on the part of the lessee ; and, on the 
 part of the lessor, that the lessee shall have quiet enjoyment 
 of the premises. But, if the lessor wishes to prohibit his 
 lessee from assigning or subletting without his license, then 
 he must not depend on that being a usual covenant.' Like- 
 wise, one not to carry on a particular trade or business,* 
 must be put in the agreement, if it is to be in the lease. 
 The precise meaning of what is a usual covenant would be 
 governed largely by the custom of the place — the uses to 
 which the property would be put, etc., and should not be 
 left open to discussion or litigation.* 
 
 It may be difficult, at times, to determine whether 
 a particular instrument is a lease or an agree- 
 
 ■ Deane Con. 346. 
 = Church V. Brozvn, 15 Vesey, 259. 
 3 Propert v. Parker, 2 My. & K. 280. 
 < Deane Con. 348. 
 
LEA8K8 — HOW MADE. 
 
 Ill 
 
 mont. The wordn "agrerH to let or hire" are words 
 of presont (Umiso, unlesH the contrary appear ' ; 
 and an af^rccment in writing, whereby A. agreed to rent to 
 B., for three years from date, for X'A) per annum, with taxes, 
 payable quarterly, B. to spend X'l^t in improvemcntH, was 
 lield to be a lease and not an agreement.' As has been re- 
 marked, an agreement for a lease must bo in writing, and 
 signed, to be sued on as such ; but ho who enters and pays, 
 or agrees to pay, rent, under an oral agreement for a lease, 
 or otherwise partly performs the agreement, may obtain a 
 decree for a lease.* A person so entering and paying rent, 
 becomes a tenant from year to year, upon such terms of 
 the agreement as are consistent with a yearly tenancy.' 
 
 2. Void Leases as A^eements. These are very 
 frequently regarded as agreements for leases, and arise from 
 the construction which the Courts have put on certain instru- 
 ments, void, in strictness, as leases, but which however were 
 intended to operate as such. The test of a lease is. Does 
 it contain words of present demise '? Even if not, but if it 
 contains, with certainty, all the terms of the lease, and has 
 been acted upon, the Court is inclined to hold it to be a 
 lease and not an agreement. In one unreported case, in our 
 own Courts, it was doubted if the statute was to be con- 
 sidered as intiuencing the question at all, where the parties 
 acted on the terms of the agreement. 
 
 Every lease now required to be in writing, must be by 
 deed, and so, if sealing were omitted, the lease would be in- 
 effectual under the statute ; but it has been held that there 
 is nothing in the Act to prevent aninstrumont, which is void 
 as a lease at law for want of a seal, from operating in equity 
 as an agreement for a lease.' And where a tenant enters 
 into possession under a void lease, he may first become 
 tenant at will, and afterwards, if he pays rent, there is a 
 
 c 
 
 I 
 
 d 
 
 00 
 
 05 
 
 c 
 
 
 % 
 
 • Gumming v. Hill, 6 O. S. 303. 
 = Grant v. Lynch, 6 C. P. 178. 
 
 3 Nitnn V. Fabian, L. R. i Chy. 35. 
 
 * Martin v. Smith, L. R. 9 Ex. 203. 
 
 5 Parker v. Taswell, 2 De G. & J. 559. 
 
112 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 cr:;:ii 
 
 r 
 
 tenancy from year to year, and all the covenants in the lease 
 will apply to the yearly tenancy.' 
 
 A tenancy at will is where a man lets land to another, 
 and either party may put an end to the tenancy at 
 pleasure.- 
 
 Where there is no clause in a mortgage that the mort- 
 gagor is to have quiet possession until default, he is tenant 
 at will to the mortgagee, and any tenancy created by the 
 mortgagor, without the concurrence of his mortgagee, is a 
 tenancy at will. A tenancy at will may be determined at 
 any time by the tenant delivering up possession, or the 
 landlord demanding it, and no notice to quit is necessary. 
 
 The case of Richardson v. Langridge^ is the leading case 
 in determining whether a tenancy be at will or from year 
 to year. In that case it was decided that an agreement to 
 let premises so long as both parties live, reserving a com- 
 pensation accruing de die in diem, and notreferredto ayear 
 or any aliquot part of a year, does not create a holding from 
 year to year, but a tenancy at will, strictly so called ; but if 
 there is a general letting at a yearly rent, though payable 
 half yearly or quarterly, and though nothing is said about 
 the duration of the term, it is an im^Dlied letting from year 
 to vear. 
 
 The leaning of the Court is to construe a tenancy as one 
 from year to year, rather than a tenancy at will. 
 
 Where a person enters into possession of land under an 
 agreement to purchase, he is tenant at will to the seller ;' 
 and, in case of an agreement to pay by instalments, with a 
 stipulation for forfeitm-e if payment be not made on a par- 
 ticular day, if payment be received on account after the day» 
 it is also a tenancy at will.^ 
 
 A tenancy from year to year may arise, as has been men- 
 tioned, or may be created, by an express agreement. If 
 
 > Richardson v. Clifford, i A. & E. 52 ; Bcale v. Sanders, 3 Bing. N. C. 
 850. 
 
 - Prideaux Con. 3. 
 
 3 4 Taunton, 128. 
 
 * Doe d. Kemp v. Garner, i U, C. Q. B. 39. 
 
 5 Liindy v. Dovey, 7 C. P. 38. 
 
LEASES PAROL LEASES. 
 
 113 
 
 one lets land to another at an annual rent without more, as 
 to the length or term of the tenancy, it creates a tenancy 
 from year to year. An overholding tenant, or tenant at 
 sufferance, may, like a tenant at will, hecorae a tenant from 
 year to year, if he pays rent to his landlord, or rather if the 
 latter receives rent from him, with the same covenants 
 and conditions as are applicable to that species of estate.' 
 And where a person takes possession and pays rent under 
 an agreement for a future lease," or under an invalid demise, 
 as in the case of a corporation without their seal,' it becomes 
 a tenancy from year to year. 
 
 Six calendar months' notice is required to determine this 
 tenancy, and the notice is to end at the period of the year 
 at which the tenancy commenced, and the tenant's execu- 
 tors or administrators are entitled to the same notice that 
 he is.* 
 
 Of course, any tenancy may be determined under the 
 terms in the lease for that purpose, or by forfeiture under 
 breaciies of covenant, or by a surrender. (See Determina- 
 tion of a Tenancy.) 
 
 IV. PAROL LEASES. 
 
 len- 
 If 
 
 c. 
 
 Mr. Hayes, in his Concise Conveyancer,* has referred to 
 the essential points in every good lease. These may be 
 epitomized to suit our law as follows : 
 
 1. Parties capable of being lessor and lessee.* 
 
 2. A thing demised which is demisable. 
 
 3. When a deed is necessary, all necessary circumstances, 
 as sealing, delivery, etc., must be observed ; and, in all 
 c^ses, the essential ingredients of the lease must be either 
 'expressed in the deed, or capable of proof by oral evidence. 
 
 ' Hyatt V. Griffith. 17 Q. B. 505. 
 
 = Doe d. Thompson v. Ainey, 12 A. & E. 476. 
 
 3 Wood V. Tate, 2 Bos. & Pul. N. S. 247. 
 
 ♦ Doe d. Shore v. Porter, 3 T. R. 13. 
 5 Page 643. 
 
 * A lease to an infant is not void, but only voidable on his coming of age. 
 Bay lis v. DyneUy, 3 M. & S. 477. 
 
 o s.c. 
 
 8 
 
114 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 era 
 ir: 
 
 4. If it be a lease for years, it must have a commence- 
 ment and ending, certain, or capable of being reduced to 
 certainty. 
 
 5. An acceptance of the thing demised by the lessee, and 
 attornment, where such is necessary. 
 
 A parol lease must not begin in futuro. The relation 
 created by a parol lease is not always easy to define. It 
 may be that, as to implied contracts of the parties, there is 
 a difiference between an oral lease and what may be called 
 a parol lease reduced into writing. 
 
 Several authorities may be cited to shew that the land- 
 lord impliedly contracts with the tenant to give him 
 possession, and guarantees him against eviction by any 
 person having a paramount title, and against a disturbance 
 which would be occasioned by some person enforcing a 
 charge which the landlord ought to have satisfied.' Our 
 Com-t of Appeal has, however, decided that, in a parol lease, 
 the lessor is not bound to give possession.* There is 
 authority for saying that the lessor impliedly promises to 
 produce a good title,' and it is frequently said that the only 
 covenant the lessor gives is for quiet possession. It is not 
 impossible that these cases may be reconciled, but that is 
 for a writer on the subject of landlord and tenant. 
 
 The weight of authority will, probably, be in favour of the 
 view taken herein. 
 
 The following points refer to cases where the relation 
 exists, but is not qualified in any way by covenants or 
 stipulations, and will be useful to the draftsman, who can 
 see the effect of not providing for the contingencies referred 
 to: — 
 
 1. Lessor's Obligations and Bights, In a parol 
 case, or in an open agreement for a lease. 
 
 Coc V. Clay, 5 Bing, 440; Bandy v. Cartivright, 8 Ex. 913, and see 
 Woodfall. L. & T. 643. 
 
 - Moore v. Kay, 5 Ont. App. 261. 
 
 1 Stranks v. St. John, L. R. 2 C. P. 376. 
 
LEASES — PAROL LEASES. 
 
 115 
 
 he 
 
 see 
 
 The lessor is bound — 
 
 (a) To produce a good title/ 
 
 (b) To give possession'; but this does not apply to parol 
 leases.* 
 
 (c) To keep the tenant in quiet possession of the 
 premises.* 
 
 (d) To pay the taxes (except personal rates).* 
 
 (e) In the case of a furnished house, that it is not 
 untenantable by reason of vermin.* 
 
 The lessor is not bound — 
 («) To repair.' 
 
 (b) To repair under an express agreement for that purpose, 
 without notice of want of repair.** 
 
 (c) To give notice to quit at the end of the term," unless 
 he wishes to claim double value." 
 
 (d) To give a written notice to put an end to a term 
 created by a parol." 
 
 The lessor has the right — 
 
 (a) To distrain for the rent, and to follow the tenant's 
 goods for this purpose ; and he has priority over any 
 chattel or other mortgagee or judgment creditor, for this 
 purpose, and every other claim, except the claim for taxes. 
 
 {b) To sue for the breach of covenants for payment of 
 rent, or the performance of any other duties, 
 (c) To bring an action of ejectment where the lease is 
 
 ■ Stranks v. St. John, L. R. 2 C. P. 376. 
 
 2 Coc V. Clay, 3 Moo. & P. 59, and cases in Addison on Contracts, 306. 
 
 J Moore V. Kay, 5 Ont. App. R. 261. 
 
 * Noke's case, 4 Co. R. 80 b, and see cases in Prideaux Con. page 11. 
 s Dove V. Dove, iS C. P. 424. 
 
 6 Smith V. Man-able, 11 M. & W. 5. 
 
 7 Gott V. Gaudy, 2 E. & B. 845. 
 
 * Makin v. Wilkinson, L. R. 6 Ex. 25. 
 9 Cobb V. Stokes, 8 East. 358. 
 
 »° 4 Geo. II., cap. 28. 
 
 " Timmins v. RowUnson, Burr, 1G03. 
 
 C 
 
 * 
 
 O 
 
 09 
 
 ax 
 
 05 
 C 
 
 s 
 
 O 
 
 c 
 
 a 
 
 n 
 
 
 
 I 
 
116 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 determined by forfeiture, effluxion of time, or notice to quit, 
 and the lessee refuses to give up the premises. 
 
 {(l) To recover double the yearly value of the premises, if 
 the lessee wrongfully and wilfully retains possession after 
 the determination of the term, where a notice in writing and 
 a proper demand of possession are given .^ 
 
 (e) To recover double rent where the tenant gives notice 
 of giving up possession at a specified time and does not do 
 
 80.' 
 
 (/) The waiver* of any one covenant or condition in a 
 lease, or the license * to do an act which, without a license, 
 would create a forfeiture or give a right to re-enter, extends 
 only to the particular waiver or license, and is not to be 
 construed as a general waiver, or as applying beyond the 
 permission actually given. 
 
 (g) A license may be given to one of several lessees or 
 co-ovraers regarding assigning, underletting or otherwise ; 
 or to a lessee, to assign or sub-let part of the property, with- 
 out such license operating to destroy or extinguish the 
 right of re-entry for the breach.* 
 
 err, 
 
 2. Lessee's Obligations and Kights. 
 sence of provision to the contrary. 
 
 In the ab- 
 
 The lessee is bound — 
 
 (rt) To accept possession, pay the rent, or see that it is 
 paid, no matter who occupies the premises, or whether they 
 are burnt down or not.* If nothing is said as to the amount 
 payable, it is presumed to be equivalent to the annual value 
 of the premises occupied.' 
 
 (b) To keep the premises wind and water-tight.' 
 
 ' 4 Geo. II., cap. 28. 
 
 * II Geo. II., cap. ig. 
 
 ^ R. S. O., cap. 136, sec. 9. 
 
 * Ibid., sec. II. 
 
 5 Ibid., sec. 10. 
 
 6 Holtzappfel v. Baker, 18 Ves. 115. 
 
 7 Deane Con. 48. 
 
 * Auworth V. yohnson, 5 C, & P. 239. 
 
LEASES PAROL LEASES. 
 
 117 
 
 (c) To cultivate the premises in a husband-like manner.' 
 
 (d) To leave at the end of the term without notice. 
 
 (e) To leave when he gives notice, or pay double rent.* 
 
 (/) To leave when he gets notice at the end of the term, 
 or by forfeiture, or pay double value.* 
 
 («/) To commit no waste, such as to pull down houses, cut 
 timber, open mines, dig for minerals, or alter the nature of 
 the land demised*; and it seems he is liable for permissive 
 waste." 
 
 (/t) To keep the bqundaries distinct between himself and 
 his lessor, if their lands adjoin.* 
 
 (i) Not to remove fixtm*es, except trade fixtures.' 
 
 The lessee is not bound — 
 
 (a) To do substantial repairs.* 
 
 (6) To give notice to leave at the end of the term.' 
 
 (c) To take possession, or be answerable in damages for 
 not taking possession, in a lease by parol." 
 
 The lessee is entitled — 
 
 (rt) To be i)ut in possession, or tendered and offered and 
 afforded the power and opportunity of taking possession ; 
 otherwise he is not liable upon any express or implied 
 covenants in the lease." 
 
 {b) To quiet enjoyment of the premises for the term. 
 
 (c) To emblements. 
 
 * Powhy V. Walker, 5 T. R. 373. 
 = 11 Geo. II. cap. 19. 
 
 ^ 4 Geo. II. cap. 28. 
 
 * I Ins., sec. 67. See Lancey v. Johnson, 29 Gr. G7, as to boring for oil. 
 5 Harnett v. MaitlanJ, 16 M. & \V. 257. 
 
 * Att'y-Genl. v. FiiUerton, 2 Ves. & B. 2C3. 
 " Hughes V. Toivers, 10 C. P. GS7. 
 
 ^ Deane Con. 54. 
 
 "5 Cobb V. Stokes, 8 East, 358. 
 
 "^ Moore v. Kay, 5 Ont. App. R. 261 ; Edge v. Stafford, 5 E. & B. 395. 
 
 ;i Holtgate V. Kay, 1 C & Kirw, 341. 
 
 c 
 
 a. c 
 
118 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 {(l) To assign or sublet the term or part of it, even if the 
 word "assigns" is not in his lease/ 
 
 {e) To cut underwood — to cut wood for fuel and for 
 repairs.' 
 
 (/) To have the rent accrue from day to day, and be 
 apportioned in respect of time, where the tenancy is deter- 
 mined by re-ent» y, death, or otherwise, of the lessor, before 
 the next pay day.* 
 
 (<jr) To six months' notice to quit, ending with the anni- 
 versary of the day be took possession, where the tenancy is 
 from year to -s 
 
 {h) To a week' i i. tloe to quit and a month's notice to- 
 quit, respectively ending with the week or the month, as the 
 case may be, in vpokly or monthly tenancies respectively.* 
 
 
 V. LEASES BY DEED. STATUTORY LEASES. 
 
 Revised Statute, cap. 103, provides short forms of leases. 
 The Act is very like the Acts respecting short forms of con- 
 veyances, and it seems it is applicable only to terms of 
 years, and not to freeholds.* The form of lease contains a 
 habendum clause, which the forms given for conveyances 
 and mortgages have not, and supplies also a reddendum 
 clause. These could not be well omitted in a lease, but 
 the absence of the former clause in deeds of grant and 
 mortgages, is remarkable, and has been referred to before. 
 
 Any form of lease in use by conveyancers, if made pur- 
 suant to the Act, gets the benefit of expanding its covenants ; 
 and, in this respect, the observations applied to instruments 
 under the other short forms Acts apply to leases.' 
 
 ' Church r. Brown, 15 Ves. 258. 
 
 - Harnett v. Maitland, 16 M. & W. 257. 
 
 3 R. S. O. cap. 136, sees. 2-3. 
 
 ♦ R. S. O. cap. 136, sec. 15. 
 
 5 Turley v. Benedict, 31 C. P. 420 ; and see wording of the Act. 
 
 * The Short Forms Act uses the words, " demise and lease , • .all 
 that messuage or tenement situate, lying, and being, etc." It may be 
 worthy of note that, what is included under this, unless an exception be 
 made therein, is somewhat different from the enumeration in the corres- 
 ponding Acts for conveyances and mortgages. 
 
LEASES — LEASES BY DEED — STATUTORY LEASES. 
 
 119 
 
 2. The Habendum. The habendum states the day on 
 which the term is to begin and the duration of the term 
 itself. The day may be a past or a futm'e one, as well as 
 the day of the making of the lease. If no time is mentioned 
 for the commencement of the lease, or if the date is an im- 
 possible date, the term will be deemed to begin from the 
 day of the delivery of the deed, or the making of the demise, 
 if extrinsic circumstances do not rebut such a presumption.* 
 
 As to the duration of the lease, it must be capable of being 
 reduced to certainty ; though, if the full extent and dura- 
 tion of it are uncertain, the lease will be held good for a 
 specific portion of time, certain within it, and void as to the 
 residue.^ If no time at all is mentioned for the duration of 
 the term, and there has been no entry upon the land nor 
 payment of rent, there is no lease at all.* Where a lease 
 was granted for seven, fourteen, or twenty-one years, after 
 the lessee entered and took possession, he had his option to 
 take that term which was most beneficial to himself, and 
 at the end of seven years, could continue on for fourteen, 
 and so on for the full term — the Courts construing the lease 
 favourably to him.^ 
 
 3. The Keddendum. The reddendum states the 
 amount of the rent and the time or times of payment. If 
 let at a yearly rent, in the absence of stipulation, the lessor 
 is entitled to payment only at the end of each year." The 
 last payment should be made in advance to secure the 
 remedies by distress, and the preceding pa3'ments should 
 be plainly set out. It is recommended not to state to whom 
 the rent is to be paid, as the law will carry it to the owner of 
 the reversion," and do it more certainly. Tlie Courts will 
 rectify an error in regard to an incomplete or mistaken re- 
 servation. Our statute as to apportionment of rent is 
 
 ■ styles V. IVai'dlc, 4 B. & C. 908. 
 '■' Gwynne v. Manistonc, 3 C. & P. 302. 
 3 Add. Con. 302. 
 
 * Dann v. Spurrier, 3 B. & P. 404 ; and see cases in Addison on Con- 
 tracts, 300-301. 
 
 5 Coomberv. Howard, i C. B. 440. 
 ^ 2 Piatt on Leases, 18. 
 
120 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 referred to elsewhere in this chapter, and it applies, it will 
 be remembered, to cases of determination of the tenancy 
 by re-entry, death, or otherwise. 
 
 Under the English Statute, 4-5 \Vm. IV., cap. 22, a 
 lessor who put an end to the lease by his own act had no 
 right of apportionment,' and Mr. Deane thinks the Act 33-34 
 Vic, cap. 35, would seem to make no difference in this 
 respect.* In Oldershaw v. Holt, referred to, the Court held 
 that the statute only applied to cases of apportionment 
 between the individual who was entitled to it when it began 
 to accrue, and another who has come in as a remainder- 
 man, or reversioner, or otherwise. 
 
 4. Covenants. Any lease made in pursuance of the 
 Act will get the benefit of it, so as to enlarge the meaning 
 of the covenants, and apply them to the parties intended 
 to be covered by the Act. Where the lessor has himself 
 the freehold, the covenants and proviso apply and extend 
 to his heirs and assigns : where he has but a leasehold 
 interest, they apply to his executors, administrators, and 
 assigns. His own covenant for quiet enjoyment extends to 
 his heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns. 
 
 The covenants to pay rent,' to pay taxes, to repair, to 
 keep up fences, and not to cut down timber, extend, appa- 
 rently, to the lessee, his heirs, executors, administrators, and 
 assigns; the proviso for re-entry — and the covenant for 
 quiet enjoyment, and to repair according to notice, to the 
 lessee, his executors, administrators, and assigns. The 
 covenant that the lessee will leave the premises in good 
 repair, apparently extends to the lessee only. 
 
 To Pay Rent. This covenant, as has been said, binds the 
 lessee, his executors, administrators, and assigns, (and, 
 
 ' See Oldershaw v. Holt, 12 A. & E. 590-596. 
 
 * Conveyancing, 356. 
 
 3 It may be doubted if this covenant extends to the heirs of the lessee. 
 See the peculiar wording of column two, in Schedule B, cap. 103 : '■ And 
 the said lessee doth hereby, for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators, 
 and assigns, covenant with the said lessor that he, the said lessee, his execu- 
 tors, administrators, and assigns, will, during the said term, pay unto the 
 said lessor the rent hereby reserved in manner hereinbefore mentioned, 
 without any deduction whatsoever." 
 
LEASES — LEASES BY DEED — STATUTORY LEASES. 
 
 121 
 
 !e. 
 id 
 
 le 
 d, 
 
 probably his heirs,) to pay the rent without any deduction 
 whatsoever, in the manner set out in the reddendum clause, 
 for the term of the lease. It is easy to see that a difficulty 
 could arise, and this covenant be useless, if the rent 
 be not mentioned previously in a definite manner. The 
 lessor would be driven to his action for use and occupation. 
 
 The lessee is not liable where the relation of landlord and 
 tenant is continued by an assignee after the term is ended. 
 
 The lessee is always under an implied covenant to pay 
 rent to the reversioner, and this is what was meant by say- 
 ing that rent is incident to the reversion.' The rent is 
 almost always, in practice, agreed upon by the parties, 
 but, if not, the amount payable would be the annual value 
 of the premises occupied. This is usually a sum of money, 
 hat it may be labour or provisions as well.'' Though the 
 rent must issue out of the thing demised, the lands or tene- 
 ments upon which distress can be made, it must not be a 
 part of the thing demised, and rent cannot be reserved out 
 of incorporeal hereditaments ^ nor out of goods.^ The 
 amount must be certain, or capable of being reduced to 
 certainty," and must be reserved to the lessor," and not to 
 a third party. The rent must be paid, even if the pre- 
 mises be burnt down, unless there is a stipulation to the 
 contrary' ; and the landlord can take insurance money which 
 he effected on the premises, and still claim the rent"; and 
 it is no answer to non-payment of the rent, that the land- 
 lord failed in making such repairs as he covenanted to do.' 
 Prior to the Judicature Act of 1881, the tenant could not 
 set off against the rent, necessary repairs made by him, 
 
 ' This phrase is no longer strictly correct, because the reversion may now 
 be merged or surrendered, and the rent remain intact. K. S. O. cap. 136, 
 sec. 8. 
 
 2 Deane Con. 48. 
 
 ' Co. Litt. 47 a. 
 
 -^ Spencer's Case, 5 Rep. 16 a. 
 
 5 Daniel v. Graccy, 6 Q. B. 145. 
 
 '' Chctham v. WiUinmsun, 4 East, 469. 
 
 7 Holfznpp/c! V. Baker, 18 Yes. 115, 
 
 ** Leeds v. Chcetham, 1 Sim. 14C. 
 
 9 Surplice v. Farnsworth, 7 M. & G. 575. 
 
 CO 
 
 C 
 
 c- o 
 
 '. 3 
 
122 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 
 which the landlord covenanted to do, for this was a cause of 
 cross action.' But it was otherwise if the landlord directed 
 the tenant to repair.'' And if the tenant is forced to pay a 
 charge on the land/ or if the landlord agreed that a debt 
 should go in satisfaction of the rent, it will be a sufficient 
 payment.* 
 
 Six years of arrears of rent can bo sued or distrained for 
 under our statute^; but the rent itself is not barred till 
 after ten years.* 
 
 The lessee is, like any other debtor, bound to find out his 
 creditor, the lessor, and tender the rent to him.' 
 
 Rent now accrues from day to day, and is apportionable 
 in respect to time accordingly." So that, if one-fourth of a 
 quarter had elapsed when the term or rent is determined, 
 only one-fourth of the quarter's rent can be claimed. This 
 is payable at the end of the quarter, or whenever the next 
 payment would have been due. Apportionment takes place 
 whenever the term is determined by re-entry, death, or 
 otherwise. 
 
 The landlord, since 4 Geo. II., cap. 28, sec. 5, can assign 
 the rent, and the assignee can distrain for it. 
 
 The covenant for payment of the rent may be entirely 
 useless if one of the lessees omit to execute the lease." 
 
 To Pay Taxes. — This includes all taxes, rates, duties, 
 and assessments, whether municipal, parliamentary, or 
 otherwise, then or thereafter chargeable upon the premises, 
 or payable by the lessor on account of the premises. 
 
 ' Taylor v. Beale, Cro, Eliz. 222 B. N. P. 177. 
 '' Gilbert on Debt, 442. 
 
 3 Dyer v. Boivley, 2 Bing. 94. See, however, as to taxes under our short 
 forms, held otherwise, Crantham v. Elliott, 6 O. S. 192. 
 
 ■• Gilbert on Debt, 443. 
 
 5 R. S. O. cap. 108, sec. 17. The covenant to pay rent is independent 
 of this. 
 
 ' K. S. O. cap. 128, sec. 4. 
 
 7 Haldancv. Johnson, 8 Ex. 689. 
 
 ** R. S. O. cap. 136, sees. 2-3. 
 
 9 Piper V. Simpson, 6 Ont. App. 175. 
 
LEASES — LEASES DY DEED — STATUTORY LEASES. 
 
 123 
 
 This covenant has been held to cover a special rate created 
 by a corporation by-law, as well as all the taxes' ; and where 
 a tenant covenanted to pay rent without reduction thereout 
 for or by reason of any matter or thing whatsoever, ho can- 
 not claim a deduction for the amount of taxes paid by him 
 for the house and premises demised." 
 
 Where a lease is silent as to taxes, the landlord must pay 
 them,' and the tenant, if compelled to pay them, may deduct 
 them out of his next payment of rent/ 
 
 To Repair. This covenant is extended to mean that 
 the lessee will well, and sufficiently repair, maintain, amend, 
 and keep the demised premises, with the appurtenances, in 
 good and substantial repair, and all fixtures and things 
 thereto belonging, or which, at any time during the said 
 term, shall be erected and made when, where, and so often 
 as need shall be. 
 
 A covenant under the Act, on the part of the lessee, to re- 
 build in case of fire, has been construed to be a continuing 
 covenant ; and so, where the lessee covenanted that, on the 
 event of the said buildings being destroyed by fire during 
 the said term, he will immediately rebuild, to an equal 
 amount; and after covenanting "to repair," there followed 
 the covenant that he will erect, put up, and build upon 
 said demised premises, a good, substantial dwelling- 
 house, and other buildings, to the value of not less than 
 $2,000, and that at the end, or sooner determination of said 
 term, from what cause soever, he will leave the said buildings, 
 and all buildings and fences erected by him upon said 
 premises thereon, and the same property shall be tlie pro- 
 perty of the lessor — it was held that on the premises being 
 burnt a second time, the lessee was bound to rebuild.' 
 
 It will be noticed that this covenant does not except fire, 
 but the subsequent covenant to leave the property in good 
 
 2 
 
 C 
 
 • Re Michic and the Corporation of Toronto, ii C. P. 379. 
 » Grantham v. Elliott, 6 O. S. 192. 
 
 3 Dove V. Dove, iS C. P. 424. 
 
 * R. S.O. cap. 230, sec. 4 (.\3sessment Act.) 
 
 5 Emmcttv. Quinn, 27 Chy. 420. This case is now before the Court of 
 Appeal. 
 
124 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO, 
 
 
 repair doc8. Semble, that the covenants should be read 
 together, being in pari materia^ and that to make them con- 
 sistent the exception of fire must be held applicable to both. 
 
 To keep up FenccH. This covenant includes the walls of 
 or belonging to, the demised premises, and should not be 
 omitted ; and further, to make anew any parts of the walls 
 or fences that may require to be new made, in a good and 
 husbandlike manner, at proper seasons of the year. 
 
 And not to cut down Timber. This prohibits hewing, fell- 
 ing, cutting down or dostro^'ing any timber or timber trees, 
 or to cause or knowingly permit or suffer the same to be 
 done, without the written consent of the lessor. But the 
 tenant can cut for necessary repairs and for firewood, and, 
 if specially set out in the lease, for the purpose of clearance. 
 
 If tapping trees has the effect of destroying or shortening 
 the lives of the trees, then the lessee, under this covenant, 
 is prohibited from so doing.' In this case the jury found it 
 had such destructive effect. 
 
 Vice-Chancellor Ferguson, in the recent case of Lanceyv. 
 Johnson,^ granted an interim injunction to restrain a lessee 
 from boring for oil on the demised premises, where the lease 
 contained no covenants on the part of the lessee other than 
 to pay rent and to pay taxes, and was silent as to any right 
 on the part of the lessee to bore for oil. 
 
 To enter and view state of Repair, etc. This reserves to 
 the lessor the right for himself and his agents, to enter the 
 premises, at all reasonable times, and examine their con- 
 dition. Any repairs necessary to be made, must be done 
 within three months after the lessor has given written 
 notice to the lessee, and the notice must be left at the 
 premises. 
 
 To leave in Good Repair, There are three separate cove- 
 nants as to repair, two referring to the property during the 
 term, and the third, as to the condition of the premises 
 when the tenant leaves them. This last covenant is, that 
 
 (I 
 
 ' Cavipbill wShieUh, 44 Q. B. 44g. 
 - 29 Gr. 67. 
 
LEA8K8 — LEASES RY DEED — STATUTORY LEASES. 
 
 125 
 
 lie will leave the premises in Rood repair, and that includes 
 the appurtenances, huildings, tsrections and fixtures thereon. 
 Good repair means good and substantial repair and con- 
 dition — reasonable wear and tear, and damage by tire only 
 excepted/ 
 
 Not to Assiun or Sublet Without Leave. This cove- 
 nant restricts the alienation of the demised premises in any 
 way, without the written consent of the lessor, his heirs or 
 assigns. 
 
 The lessee is at liberty to assign or sublet the premises 
 leased to him, unless there be a stipulation to the contrary 
 in his lease. If he covenants not to assign, he may under- 
 let, though not for the whole term, as that amounts to an 
 assignment ; but it would seem that the converse case does 
 not apply. If he covenant not to underlet, he will be pro- 
 hibited, it seems, from assigning.* 
 
 The covenant is usually worded — "Not to assign or 
 underlet the lands or premises, or any part thereof, without 
 leave being given by the landlord, or his \?eL't, in writing," 
 and is sometimes qualified by adding — " but which license 
 and consent it is hereby expressly agreed by and between 
 the parties hereto shall not be withheld unreasonably or 
 vexatiously.^" 
 
 Under this it has been held that, where the assignee was 
 wholly unobjectionable, and the object of refusing consent 
 was avowedly the wish to get a surrender for the purpose of 
 rebuilding, the lessee was entitled to relief from such 
 unreasonable and vexatious conduct.* It is suggested that 
 the clause should read, that the consent of the lessor to any 
 assignment or under-lease shall not be capriciously or 
 unreasonably withheld, nor withheld at all, to a responsible 
 assignee.* Even if the lessee do assign contrary to his 
 covenant, the lessor does not acquire any right to the pos- 
 
 ' See under covenant to repair, supra. 
 
 * See chapter on Assignments — Leases. 
 3 Hayes, Con. 663. 
 
 * Lehman v. Mc Arthur, L. R. 3 Chy. 746. 
 s Greenwood's Con. 57. 
 
126 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 o 
 
 session of the indenture of lease in virtue of the breach/ It 
 ■would, of course, be different if, on a breach of any of the 
 covenants the lessor has reserved a right to re-enter ; but, if 
 nothing is said as to that, the lessor will only have his action 
 of damages. Where a lease contained a proviso for re-entry, 
 in case the lessor should assign or sublet his estate therein, 
 or any part thereof, and it was proved that the lessee had 
 entered into a partnership with A., and agreed that he 
 should have the exclusive use of ont room and other parts 
 of the premises, it was held that this amounted to a 
 forfeiture." 
 
 A compulsory assignment is no breach, as where a lease 
 is sold under bona Jide execution ; but a warrant of attorney 
 for that purpose has been held a fraud, and a breach of the 
 condition*; though not so where the debts are bona Jide*; 
 and a voluntary assignment in insolvency contrary to the 
 statutory covenant, not to assign without leave, has been 
 held to be a breach of the covenant and a forfeiture.* 
 
 The covenant is not construed harshly against the tenant. 
 In a case where the lessee covenanted not to let, set or 
 assign the premises, or the term estate, or premises thereby 
 granted, or otherwise part with his interest therein, or 
 thereto, to any person or persons whatsoever, without the 
 lessor's consent in writing, the fact that, on leaving the 
 country for a short time, he rented them in such a way that 
 the tenant was to go out when required, was held not to be 
 a forfeiture * ; and, where there was no express provision 
 for re-entry, but the lease made ** subject to a stipulation, 
 that the lessee should not assign without the written con- 
 sent of the lessor," this was not regarded full enough to 
 warrant ejectment by the lessor.' An express, positive 
 
 * Elsworthy v. Hewett, 4 N. R. 371. 
 
 * Roe V. Sales, i M. & S. 297. 
 
 3 Ooe\. Carter, 8 T. R. 57. 
 
 4 Croft\. Lumby, 5 El. and Bl. 682. 
 ^Magcev. Rankin, 36 Q. B. 257. 
 
 ' Leysv. Fisken, 12 Q. B. 604. 
 7 Mcintosh V. jf antes, 24 C. P. 625. 
 
LEASES — LEASES BY DEED — STATUTORY LEASES. 
 
 127 
 
 covenant, would seem to be necessary to warrant a right of 
 re-entry — a negative covenant is not sufficient.' 
 
 Where there is an actual forfeiture, no notice or demand 
 is necessary in case there is a right of re-entry on a breach 
 of covenant not to under-let.^ 
 
 Quiet Enjoyment. The only covenant given by the lessor 
 under the statutory form, is that for quiet enjoyment. 
 
 This does not mean that the lessee is to quietly enjoy the 
 premises under all circumstances, but only on his paying the 
 rent and performing the covenants. The lessor's covenant 
 extends only to parties claiming by, from or under himself, 
 or his heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns — it does 
 not refer to a disturbance by a paramount owner — such as 
 by a mortgagee whose mortgage is created by a former owner 
 prior to the lease.' 
 
 The usual covenants for title run with the land,* and an 
 action on such can only be maintained by the party between 
 whom and the covenantor there is privity of estate at the 
 time of the breach'' ; and so, where the estate is conveyed, the 
 vendor cannot sue on such covenants for subsequent breaches,* 
 but, if only part be sold, the vendor can recover to the extent 
 of his interest." 
 
 See ante, under Lessor's Title. 
 
 Proviso for re-entry. This is the most important part of 
 a lease, and the omission a serious inconvenience to the 
 lessor. The statutory provision refers to the non-payment 
 of rent, or non-performance of covenants or agreements. As 
 to rent, the right to re-enter does not arise for fifteen days 
 after the rent, or any part of it, has remained unpaid. No 
 formal demand is necessary. 
 
 ' Lee V. Lorch, 37 Q. B. 2G2. See Bacon v. Campbell, 40 Q. B. 517. 
 ^ Connellv Poiver, 13 C. P. 91. 
 
 ^ Bellamy v. Barnes 44 Q. B. 315 ; Barnes v. Bellamy, 44 Q. B. 303. 
 * Gamble V. Rees, 6 Q. B., 396. 
 
 5 Rowe V. Street, 8 C. P. 217. But since the Act relating to Choses in 
 Action, R. S. O. cap. 116, the covenant may be assignable by contract. 
 See Re Haisley 44 y. B. 345. 
 
 ' Scriver v, Myers, 9 C. P 255. 
 
 ^ Keyes v. O'Brien, 20 Q. B. 12. 
 
 ^ 
 
128 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVETANCINO. 
 
 As to breach of covenants, it is not necessary to wait any 
 time after the covenant is broken — the lessor can enter and 
 occupy the premises, as of his former estate.* 
 
 The High Comrt of Justice will almost always relieve against 
 the right of re-entry on payment of the rent, and it has 
 power, by statute, to relieve as to breach of the covenant to 
 insure. (See under Determination of Tenancy in this 
 chapter — Forfeiture . ) 
 
 Mr. Hayes, in his Conveyancing,' says, that the right of 
 re-entry arises only by express grant, and cites Jemott v. 
 Cowley t 1 Saund. 112, as to its conveying an uncertain 
 interest. A clause of re-entry is to be construed strictly. 
 
 VI. THE DETERMINATION OF A TENANCY. 
 
 A term of years may be determined by forfeiture, by 
 effluxion of time, by notice from either party, or by sur- 
 render. 
 
 1. Forfeiture. Unless the lessor has right to re-enter 
 and put an end to the term by express agreement, he is not 
 entitled to do so ; and even where he has such right, if he 
 subsequently does any act which amounts to a recognition 
 of a subsisting tenancy, he is presumed to have waived the 
 forfeiture. And, so, if he accepts rent, or brings an action 
 for rent accruing after the forfeiture, he leads the tenant to 
 believe that the forfeiture will not be insisted upon ; or if he 
 distrains, he may generally be said to have lost his right 
 to re-enter. Frequently, also, where the tenant makes full 
 compensation, the com*ts will relieve, and they always do 
 so in the case of rent, unless accompanied by a breach of 
 other covenants ; but, in general, they will not interfere in 
 the case of other covenants. Now, by statute, they have 
 power to relieve as to the covenant to insure, where no fire 
 has taken place, and where an insurance, in conformity with 
 the covenant, is on foot, and the neglect to insure has not 
 been due to fraud or gross negligence.' 
 
 ' See Conneli v Power, 13 C. P. 91. 
 » Concise Conveyancer, 596. 
 3 R. S. O. cap. 40, sec. 49. 
 
 But see the expanded proviso. 
 
LEASES — THE DETERMINATION OF A TENANCY. 
 
 129 
 
 A clause of re-entry, as has been remarked, is to be con- 
 strued strictly.' 
 
 It has been held, in a recent case, that in the absence of 
 stipulation, a lessor is not entitled to insist on a proviso for 
 re-entry, on breach of any of the covenants.'* In a lease, 
 as it stood at common law, the lessor could re-enter for 
 non-payment of rent, but a strict demand was necessary, 
 which is still in force, apparently. The demand must be for 
 the precise sum, on the exact day on which it became due, 
 and made on the premises at a convenient hour before 
 sunset. 
 
 Effluxion of time. Where the premises are let for a fixed 
 period of time, no notice to quit or leave is necessary from 
 either party.' 
 
 Notice to Quit. In a tenancy from year to year, no mat- 
 ter how created, half a year's notice, ending with the period 
 of the year at which the tenancy commenced,* is necessary ; 
 and, if the tenant dies, his executors are entitled to the 
 same notice."^ Half a year's notice is necessary, though the 
 rent be payable half-yearly, or quarterly.* Under our 
 statute,' a month's notice is necessary to a monthly holding, 
 and a week's notice to a weekly holding. No notice is 
 necessary to determine a tenancy at will, but possession 
 must be either delivered by the tenant, or demanded by the 
 landlord.' The notice is generally a written one ; but a 
 parol notice has been held sufficient to determine a term 
 created by parol," and notice to one of several tenants in 
 common is sufficient." The notice must be half a year, not 
 
 • Per Lord Tenterden, C.J., Doc v. Marchetti, i B. & Aid. 720. 
 = Hodgkinson v. Crozve, L. R. 10, Chy. 622. 
 
 3 Cobb V. Stokes, 8 East, 358 ; Right v. Darby, i T. R. 159. 
 
 * Kelly V. Patterson, L. R. 9 C. P. 681. 
 5 Doe d. Shore v. Parker, 3 T. R. 14. 
 
 ' Shirley v. Newman, 1 Esp. 266, 
 
 7 R. S. O. cap 136, sec. 15. 
 
 « Right d. Lewis V. Beard, 13 East, 210; Doe v. Cox, 11 Q B. 122. 
 
 9 Tiininins v. Rotvlinson, Burr. 1603, See L egg v. Benton, Willes, 43. 
 
 '0 Doe V. Crick, 5 Esp. 196. 
 
 o's.c. 9 
 
130 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 ^W'. 
 
 six lunar months.' The only guide in this case is, that, 
 prima facie, the time of payment of the rent is the com- 
 mencement of the t.enancy.' The notice may be waived by 
 the acceptance of rent or distress for rent due subsequently 
 to the notice. 
 
 The notice must be directed to the tenant, and any 
 general description applicable to the whole of the property 
 demised will suffice ; and, unless the tenant is misled, a 
 mistake in his Christian name, or a mis-description of the 
 premises, will not invalidate the notice. The notice should 
 be i3eremptory, and not in the alternative, which the tenant 
 may accept, and bind the landlord thereby ; and the time 
 of quitting must be specified, and must correspond with the 
 termination of the term. The notice will be construed with 
 reference to the current year, and if too late for it, will not 
 avail for the next year. If the time of termination is a 
 matter of doubt, the notice may be given in the alternative, 
 so as to hit one of two periods ; and such a notice has been 
 held to possess all the certainty that is reasonably required 
 for the information of the tenant. 
 
 The notice should, if possible, be served on the lessee ; 
 but notice served upon the actual occupiers of the demised 
 premises is sufficient, unless they are servants. Notice 
 may be effectually sent through the post.' Where the land- 
 lord had a right to put an end to the term, in the event of 
 his selling the property, and falsely notified the tenant that 
 he had sold, and demanded possession, the tenant, having 
 acted on this notice, to his loss, was held entitled to 
 recover the damages he had sustained.' 
 
 Surrender. A lease may be determined by a surrender, 
 implied in law, or a surrender by writing under seal. 
 
 A surrender will be implied at law, when the lessee ac- 
 cepts a new lease,* or a new lessee is accepted by all parties,' 
 
 • Doe V. Smith, 5 A. &. E. 350. Where the time of the commencement 
 of the tenancy cannot be proved, the notice must be served personally. 
 
 Doe V. Forster, 13 East, 405. 
 
 See cases on Notice to Quit, Addison on Contracts, 335-345. 
 
 Cowling V, Dickson, 5 Ont. App. Repts. 549. 
 
 Davison v. Stanley, Burr. 2210. 
 
 Phipps V. Sculthorpe, i B. & Aid. 50. 
 
LEASES DISTRESS. 
 
 131 
 
 to 
 
 5S, 
 
 or rent is accepted b}^ the lessor from an undertenant'; and 
 in the case of yearly tenant, the receipt of the key has been 
 construed as a surrender.* In the former cases, the new 
 lease must commence immediately, or be otherwise incon- 
 sistent with the old one,^ and the second one may be of 
 shorter duration than the first.* 
 
 Every sm-render, other than by implication of law, must 
 be by deed, no matter what the duration of the term may 
 be, and it is only by this instrument that the relation of 
 landlord and tenant can be effectually extinguished. It 
 acts as a dissolution of the partnership, and relieves the 
 parties from their obligations. 
 
 As to surrender of lease by wife, see Whcelden x.MiUifjan 
 44 Q. B. 174. 
 
 VII. DISTRESS. 
 
 Distress is a common law right to enter on the demised 
 premises between the hours of sunrise and sunset, and to 
 seize any corn, grass or other product growing on any part 
 of the lands demised, and any personal chattels (with some 
 exceptions) to be found thereon, for rent in arrears. The 
 goods must be appraised by two appraisers, reasonably 
 competent, and five days, exclusive of the day of taking, 
 must elapse before they can be sold.' Within this time the 
 lessee is at liberty either to pay the rent, if he owes it, 
 or he can replevy the goods and contest the lessor's right to 
 seize them for rent. The landlord cannot purchase the 
 goods sold in this way*; and this extraordinary power which 
 a landlord has, not only to distrain, but sell the goods of his 
 tenant, or even of a stranger upon the premises, for rent, is 
 one which ought to be strictly pursued.' There is no right 
 
 ■ Thomas v. Cook, 2 B. & Aid. 219. 
 
 = Dodd V. Acklein, 6 M. & G. 672. See, however, Caution v. Hartley, 19 
 L.J.C. P. 323, where there was no entry or possession, it was held otherwise. 
 3 Prideaux Con. 12. 
 ♦ Hughes V. Rou'butham, Cr. Eliz. 302. 
 
 ?; Bnrnham v. Waddell, 28 C. P. 263 ; Wilson v, Nighingale, 8 Q. B. 
 1034 ; Alien v. Flicker, 10 A. & E. 640. 
 
 ^ Williams v. Grey, 23 C. P. 561. 
 
 7 Per Harrison, C.J., in Schultz v. Reddick, 43 Q. B. 163. 
 
182 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 of distress unless the rent is fixed. There must be a con- 
 tract for, and an actual demise for, a specific sum.* 
 
 The tenant's fixtures, or his implements of trade, if in 
 actual use at the time, cannot be distrained ; nor can goods 
 of a stranger, delivered to the lessee to be carried or wrought 
 or managed in the way of his trade or employment ; and 
 pawned or warehoused goods * are generally exempt from 
 seizure, as are beasts of the plow, etc. 
 
 In a recent case, it was held, that, where an agent for a 
 reaping machine manufactory left a machine at a hotel, 
 and only called once or twice, it was not exempt from 
 seizure.* 
 
 The goods of lodgers are now exempt from seizure by the 
 superior landlord, under our Ontario Statute, 43 Vic, cap. 16. 
 
 > Mitchell V. McDuffy, 31 C. P. 266 ; Dunk v. Hunter, 5 B. & Aid. 325. 
 
 =» Swire v. Leach, 18 C. B. N. S. 479 ; Miles v. Furbcr, L. R. 8 Q. B. 77. 
 
 3 Mitchell V. Coffee, 5 Ont. App. 525. See Patterson v. Thompson, 46 
 Q.B.7. 
 
 Note. — A greenhouse, conservatory and hot-house, affixed to the free- 
 hold, are not removable by the tenant, and the glass roc. fs of these are also 
 fixtures; but machinery for heating the same, whether resting on the 
 arches, or passing through them, are removable. Gardiner v. Parker, 18 
 Chy. 26. Trade fixtures are removable, and they comprise such as can be 
 removed without materially injuring the building. (Hughes v. Towers, 18 
 C. P. 287.) So, an engine and boiler put into a carpenter's shopand manu- 
 factory of agricultural implements, are trade fixtures, and removable 
 (Prongtiey v. Gurney, 37 Q. B. 347); though the saws and other machinery 
 of a saw mill are not such. (Richardson v. Ranney, 2 C. P. 460.) No 
 definite rule can be deduced from the cases as to what are trade fixtures, 
 and what are not. The latest case on fixtures (Keefer v. Merrill, 6 Ont. 
 App. 121), decided, not without some conflict of opinion, that machines 
 are not fixtures, unless put in the building with the intention that they 
 become part of the realty. 
 
CHAPTER VI. 
 
 I. MORTGAGES OF LAND. 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 II. Advances — Securitv. 
 
 III. The Statutory Form of 
 
 Mortgages. 
 
 IV. Recitals. 
 
 V. Estate Clause. 
 VI. Proviso for Redemption. 
 
 VII. Personal Covenant. 
 
 VIII. Other Covenants. 
 
 IX. Power of Sale or Leasing. 
 
 X. The Statutory Power of 
 Sale. 
 
 XI. Dower. 
 
 XII. Rights of the Parties. 
 
 II. DISCHARGES OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 I. PRELIMINAEY. 
 
 A mortgage of land is a grant thereof, with an equity to 
 redeem attached ; and, excepting the conditions or provisos 
 for possession, and for reconveyance to the grantor, or 
 mortgagor, as he is called, there is very little difference 
 between a sale and a mortgage — between an absolute and 
 a conditional grant of land — so far as the deed of convey- 
 ance is concerned.' 
 
 It will be observed that the property in both cases is 
 granted, and so the necessary convening words can be iden- 
 tical in each, though there may be additional apt words to 
 be used in freeholds, leaseholds, or chattels, and such is the 
 case in practice. 
 
 ' An agreement for a mortgage of land is apparently an interest in 
 lanrls within the 4th section of the Statute of Frauds, the same as an agree- 
 ment for a sale of land. See Ante, page 57. 
 
 
 CO 
 
 
 
 
 CO 
 
 
 C 
 
 
 0^ 
 
 
 3 
 
 C5 
 
 5 
 
 e^ 
 
 a 
 
 <t5 
 
 m 
 
 % 
 
134 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 There is no statutory form for mortgages, except that 
 given by R. S. 0., cap. 104, which applies only to free- 
 holds.' This form uses the words, " grant and mortgage." 
 If the instrument is to be a mortgage of freeholds, or estates 
 of inheritance, whether in possession or remainder, then the 
 word grant must be used to convey the fee — the Legislature 
 added the word mortgage, no doubt to define the instru- 
 ment more accurately — to leave no room for doubt in the 
 matter. 
 
 In leaseholds, the words grant and demise are used ; and 
 in chattels, gi'ant, bargain, sell, and assign. 
 
 Again, if the absolute conveyance requires a deed, the 
 conditional conveyance requires one also. In general, 
 neither a bill of sale nor a mortgage of chattels requires 
 to be made by deed, yet it is usual to have it so.'" 
 
 A mortgage of chattels is not made under a statutory 
 form ; but so far as creditors are concerned, must be signed, 
 delivered and witnessed, the necessary affidavits as to bona 
 fides and good consideration, made out, and then filed in 
 the office of the Clerk of the County Com*t, in the same way 
 as a bill of sale of the chattels. 
 
 Then, a deed, as a deed, has uniform formalities and 
 solemnities. A mortgage of land is, by statute, an inden- 
 ture, is made in duplicate for registration, has its date, 
 parties, recitals, as in a deed of grant, and must be signed, 
 sealed and delivered, witnessed, and registered in the 
 County Registry Office, and must set out its parcels of 
 lands the same as in an absolute conveyance. 
 
 In regard to these points, it may in general be stated, 
 that there is no difference in the instrument, whether it be 
 a deed or grant absolutely, or a deed of grant conditionally 
 
 • It is submitted that a consideration of the Short Forms Act will 
 establish : 
 
 i. That, in sales and mortgages of land, the Acts respectively refer- 
 ring thereto apply only to estates for life, or in fee, whether cor- 
 poreal or incorporeal, or to any undivided part or share therein, 
 ii. That the Act respecting Forms of Leases applies only to terms 
 of years and not to Freeholds. 
 
 " See under Personal Property, post. 
 
MORTGAGES OF LAND — ADVANCES — SECURITY. 
 
 135 
 
 — a sale or a mortgage, in fact. The points of similarity 
 are, of com-se, as important in a mortgage as in a deed ; 
 and under each of the foregoing, attention must be paid 
 as strictly in one as in the other. When the student has 
 mastered these necessary points, remembering that they 
 are common to mortgages as well as to sales of land, he 
 can then turn his attention to those parts that are peculiar 
 to a mortgage.^ 
 
 will 
 
 ;fer- 
 cor- 
 
 II. ADVANCES— SECURITY. 
 
 A mortgage, being a security that looks mainly to the 
 lands or goods ^ mortgaged for +he repayment of the money 
 advanced by the mortgagee to the mortgagor (or, as fre- 
 quently happens, a security for money already due to the 
 mortgagee,), it is of the first importance to consider what 
 advances can safely be made, and whether any advance at 
 all can be made. If the intending mortgagor is already 
 indebted to his mortgagee, then, of course, the latter may 
 be glad to get anything he can ; but, where it is a question 
 of the prudence or safety of a loan — an advance — then, as 
 it is not imperative, the loan can be refused, if the proposed 
 security is insufficient. It is, of course, no part of a 
 solicitor's duty to say whether or not the proposed security 
 is adequate to justify such and such a loan, unless that 
 duty be specially cast upon him' ; but he is often called upon 
 to form and give an opinion in the matter, and he should be 
 at least able to suggest proper enquiries. 
 
 A borrower must, as a rule, come to the terms offered, 
 and is generally in no better position than the adage puts 
 him, as to his inability to be a chooser. He is not, 
 therefore, so much in need of a solicitor as a vendor, who 
 sells absolutely. He will have a fair notion of what money 
 he is to get ; and the terms of the rate per cent, and of re- 
 payment are not matters he enters upon without enquiry 
 
 ' This chapter should be read in connexion with the chapter on Sales of 
 Land. Ante, page 68. 
 
 * See Ante, page 47, note. 
 
 3 Brembridge v. Massey, 32 L. T. 108. 
 
 CO 
 
 MM 
 
 w 
 
 c 
 
 3: 
 ^ a 
 
 s 
 
186 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 and full knowledge obtained. Comparatively, with his 
 mortgagee he runs no risk. He knows that, whatever words 
 may be in the mortgage deed, even if it be on its face an 
 absolute deed of grant, if the money he receives is, in reality, 
 a loan on his land, and not the j)rit'e for the sale of it, the 
 High Court of Justice will give him relief on his doing 
 equity in the matter. He cannot be charged a higher rate 
 of interest than he contracts for, although he may suffer for 
 not being prompt in his payments, and have to pay a 
 higher rate than if he were punctual ; but all this must be 
 set out in the deed, and he knows of it beforehand. A 
 solicitor maybe of some use in obtaining a loan, or in modi- 
 fying clauses as to interest, or as to being turned out of 
 possession, or in the matter of applying the insurance 
 money, if the premises are burnt down; but, generally 
 speaking, the mortgagee has it all his own way, and the 
 solicitor acting for him usually makes that way to be very 
 favourable to his client, if he is to take any responsibility 
 in the matter. 
 
 In acting for a mortgagee who lends money on a particu- 
 lar security, and expects to get it back again by the sale of 
 that security, too great care cannot be exercised. Two 
 things are mainly, of course, to be considered ; the first is, 
 will the sale of the secm'ity, under the most adverse circm- 
 stances, realize the money lent and the costs attending such 
 sale ; and, secondly, can a perfect title, for the purpose of a 
 sale, be made out and assigned to your client. K either of 
 these be wanting, the advance can not, or ought not, to be 
 made. 
 
 It is true, that the personal covenant, which every 
 mortgagor makes to repay the money, is, at all times, of 
 some value,* and it may be taken into consideration with 
 the value of the property, though not with a defect in the 
 title. But it must be remembered that, before this cove- 
 nant is available, a judgment must be obtained, and the 
 personal chattels of the mortgagor sold — that is, where any 
 personal chattels can be reached. 
 
 ' Greenwood Conveyancing, page 39. 
 
MORTOAGKS OF LAND — ADVANCES — SECURITY. 
 
 137 
 
 be 
 
 my 
 
 The chattels may be set ofif against the interest in a 
 mortgage ; and chattels do no more than represent the 
 personal covenant, or, rather, the covenant is valuable to 
 the extent of the chattels. A mortgagor may die after he 
 signs the mortgage deed, and his chattels may no more 
 than pay the other creditors' claims ; still, a personal 
 covenant is often a good part of the security, and, with an 
 honest borrower, mav be worth more than his lands. 
 
 While some relaxation may be made in the valuation, or 
 where it may be supplemented in ways to be referred to 
 presently, no advance should be counselled where a good 
 title — a marketable title — does not exist. A mortgagee is 
 not subject to any restrictions as to title, or the evidence of 
 it, nor is time of the essence of his undertaking to com- 
 plete the matter ; and he is in a very different position 
 from a willing purchaser, who may waive many points in 
 the title through a wish to get what he has purchased.' 
 
 It is of little consequence, if the property is worth ten 
 times the advance, if the title to it is not transferable to 
 and from the mortgagee. It is the solicitor's chief duty to 
 go through and make out such a title as can be forced on 
 an unwilling purchaser. It rarely happens that a solicitor 
 undertakes to value the property or recommend that a 
 stated sum be advanced on it. He may, and does, recom- 
 mend that one-half, or two-thirds of its appraised value, be 
 lent on property, or that no sum whatever should be 
 lent thereon ; but that is comparatively irresponsible, when 
 it is considered that he is exjiected to say whether or not 
 the title is unexceptional, and that it can be conveyed to 
 the whole world for as much as the property will bring. 
 
 The searches in the different offices, as referred to in the 
 Chapter on Title, must, therefore, be made with more 
 minuteness, and with less reserve, than when acting for a 
 purchaser. For a purchaser, when let into possession, may 
 have a safe holding title, that protects him in i^ossession 
 against everybody ; but that sort of title is not sufficient for 
 a mortgagee who does not expect, and may not wish, to 
 
 ' Greenwood Conveyancing, page 39. 
 
138 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVKYANCINO. 
 
 take possession, and who could not force lii.s title on an 
 unwilling purcliaKer. A safe holding title may do for a 
 purchaser who, with the negative advantagi; of not being 
 liable to be disturbed, has the positive disadvantage of not 
 being able to sell ; but a mortgagee needs and expects a 
 marketable title, and no qimntiim of security will compen- 
 sate for the absence of it. 
 
 As was remarked, however, a solicitor may be called 
 upon to classify securities, so as to be able to say what 
 proportion can be safely loaned on their appraised value. 
 
 Before a solicitor can do this, he must be conversant with 
 the local surroundings of the property, so as to judge what 
 may, or may not, raise or depreciate its value. City, town, 
 or village property, is more liable to fluctuations in value 
 than farm property — it may suddenly become increased 
 tenfold, by reasons familiar to every resident in the place ; 
 or, by some capricious or unfortunate change, it may depre- 
 ciate, and its usefulness, in a commercial sense, be gone 
 forever. The expected railroad or factory may not be built, 
 and so it may remain at its low figure ; or the railroad may 
 come, and cut it into triangles, leaving it worthless. A 
 village may perversely grow on the other side, and away 
 from the lociifi in quo ; or some neighbour may erect a 
 tannery or abattoir in too undesirable proximity. 
 
 Country farm property is the least liable to disastrous 
 fluctuations, and forms the best security. Mr. Greenwood 
 classifies securities somewhat as follows : — 
 
 1. Farms (freehold.) Fee. 
 
 2. Houses 
 
 3. Houses (leasehold.) 
 
 4. Mills, manufactories, mines (freehold or leasehold.) 
 
 5. Life estates. 
 
 6. Policies of insm*ance. 
 
 7. Furniture, st9ck in trade, etc. 
 
 i: 
 
MORTQAGES OK LAND — STATUTOUY FORM OF MOUT(iAOi:. 130 
 
 III. STATUTORY FOU^I OF MORTCiAGE.' 
 
 There are not very many matoriiil differonees between the 
 Act respecting Short Forms of Conveyances, Rev. Stat. 
 Ont., cap. 102, and the Act respt'-tin;^ Short Forms of Mort- 
 gages, cap. 104. The latter is a suhsecpient Act ; hut the 
 phraseoU)gy is not at all copied from its predecessor. 
 " Lands " and " party " mean the same in hoth Acts ; liut 
 it is remarkable that a mortgage under the statute should 
 expressly limit its operation to real property within 
 Ontario, while the Act as to conveyances is silent on that 
 point. The law of the situs governs, but the High Court of 
 Justice, can act in personam, no matter where the land is 
 situate. 
 
 Every other part of the Acts and their schedule A. 
 may be said to be identical, nintatis mutandis, with two 
 exceptions. In describing what is included in the grant, 
 in sec. 4, the Act respecting mortgages has the words, 
 " subject always to the reservations, limitations, provisos, 
 and conditions, contained in the grant of such lands from 
 the Crown," which its corresponding Act has not.^ This 
 may be a reason for inserting these words in the forms used 
 by the law stationers. 
 
 Sec. 3 is noteworthy. In short forms of conveyances, it 
 is said that any deed, or part of a deed, failing to take effect 
 by virtue of the Act, will be as effectual to bind the parties 
 so far as the rules of law and equity will permit, as if the 
 Act had not been made. The corresponding section in tlie 
 Act respecting short forms of mortgages, speaks of " any 
 
 • The statutory form of mortgages should not be applied to Leasehold 
 or other chattel property. The Act authorizing Short Forms of Mortgages 
 applies only to estates in land — freehold or in fee. A mortgage of a 
 Leasehold interest should be by way of underlease ; and where there is a 
 covei it against assigning or subletting, then the mortgage should be with 
 1 covenants. The courts, of course, may give effect to the forvi 
 rtgage of Leaseholds under the Short Forms Act (cap. 104), so far 
 . ules of Law or Equity will permit ; but it is very doubtful if they 
 look at the statute in order to enlarge the covenants and apply them 
 >ts they were never intended to affect. 
 
 o the effect of mortgages on land affecting chattel property thereon, 
 see ^iitc, page 47, note. 
 
 " The covenant for title has this clause also. 
 
 expa- 
 of a 
 as 
 
 CCj 
 
 to Gl 
 
 Af 
 
 55 
 
 at 
 
 MM 
 
 w 
 C 
 Q 
 
 
140 
 
 PRACTICAL C0N\TA'ANCINO. 
 
 
 such mortgage, or part of such mortgage," referring only to 
 mortgages made in pursuance to the Act, or referring to it 
 in some way. It is apprehended that this verbal discre- 
 pancy is an omission in the Act respecting short forms of 
 conveyances, and whether or not makes no material dif- 
 ference. It is in the matter of covenants and provisos 
 that the two statutes differ chief!}-. 
 
 The covenant that the mortgagor has the right to con- 
 vey is different from that of the grantor in a deed of grant. 
 The latter does not give an absolute covenant — it is restricted 
 by the addition of the words, " notwithstanding any act of 
 the said covenantor." The eflPect of omitting these words 
 has been to make the covenant an absolute one.' 
 
 The covenant for quiet enjoyment in a deed of grant gives 
 the grantee the express right ^f having, receiving, and tak- 
 ing, the rents, issues, and profits, of the land, or any part 
 thereof, which the mortgagee is not entitled to under this 
 covenant. He must always account for the rent, issues, 
 and profits, on his taking possession after default, and 
 before his title is absolute. 
 
 The covenant as to freedom from encumbrance, differs in 
 the two forms. In an absolute conveyance it omits all 
 arrears of taxes, and assessments, but refers to a number of 
 instruments, such as gifts, grants, jointures, trusts, etc., not 
 expressly set out in the mortgage covenant. 
 
 The covenant for further assurance in a mortgage, is 
 available only after default is made in the payment of the 
 principal money or interest, or any part of either, or in 
 respect of the provisions, agreements, or stipulations in 
 the proviso. 
 
 There is no material difference in the covenant for the 
 production of title deeds, which, in both instruments, binds 
 the covenantors, unless they are prevented by fire, or other 
 inevitable accident. 
 
 The covenant that the conveying party has done no act 
 to encumber the lands, refers, in a mortgage, to the mort- 
 
 ' McKay v. McKay, 31 C. P. i. See Ante, par-j 19. 
 
MORTGAGES OF LAND STATUTORY FORM OF MORTGAGE. 141 
 
 gagor only — in a deed of grant to the grantor, his heirs, 
 executors, and administrators. 
 
 The general release differs only that, in a mortgage, it is, 
 of course, subject to the proviso — in a deed, it is absolute. 
 
 The bar of dower is the same in both instruments, but 
 under a recent Ontario Statute, the bar extends only to the 
 purposes of the mortgage. (44 Vic, cap. 14.) A mortgagor, in 
 addition, covenants that he has a good title in fee simple 
 to the said lands, and that he will pay the mortgage money. 
 The statute contemplates a covenant for insurance, which 
 the law will hold for the benefit of the mortgagee.^ 
 
 These three covenants and the provisos conclude the 
 differences between the two instruments. Two of the pro- 
 visos are for the benefit of the mortgagor — one making the 
 mortgage void on payment, and the other giving him pos- 
 session till default. The other provisos are for the benefit 
 of the mortgagee — to enter and lease, or sell, in default of 
 payment — to distrain for arrears of interest, and the pro- 
 viso making the principal due whenever the interest is in 
 default. 
 
 Unless the mortgagor has the proviso as to possession 
 inserted, he can be turned out on the execution of the 
 instrument, and so its importance to him is evident." The 
 proviso for distress is seldom availed of, and it has been 
 held to be a mere license to hold the goods, and not at all 
 the landlord's right to distrain.* 
 
 Where a mortgagee desires to have, not only his remedies 
 as such, against his mortgagor, but also the extraordinary 
 remedies of a landlord, so as to distrain the go >ds on the 
 land for arrears of interest, in priority to an intervening 
 mortgagee of the goods, or judgment creditors, it is not 
 impossible that a clause can be framed in the mortgage 
 giving him these privileges. The two relations of mort- 
 gagor and tenant may undoubtedly be created by the one 
 
 ' Gycct V. Citizens' Iitsnraiicc Co., 27 Chy. 121. 
 
 - The intention of the parties will be looked at, where there is no 
 redemise clause. Superior Savings and Loan Co. v. Lucas, 44 Q. B. 100. 
 
 3 Laing v. The Ontario Loan and Savings Co., C. L. J., July, 1881, page 
 423, 46 y. B. 114. 
 
142 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 instrument ; but, so far, it appears that the statutory dis- 
 tress clause is not sufficient ' ; and it remains to be seen if 
 even an attornment clause- will answer the purpose. The 
 clause should, at least, state tliat arrears of interest should 
 be considered as rent in arrear, and that all the powers of 
 a landlord should expressl}- belong to the mortgagee, in order 
 to distrain the same. The Legislature should restrain this 
 monopoly of privileges on the part of the land mortgagee, or 
 compel him to file a copy of his mortgage with the Clerk of 
 the County Court in the county where the mortgagor's 
 chattels are situate. 
 
 IV. EECITALS. 
 
 Ordinarily there is much less necessity for recitals in a 
 deed of grant than in a mortgage, but, unless in special cases, 
 as those of Loan Companies, where the borrowers are made 
 shareholders, etc., there is no object in reciting the terms 
 of the loan. (See ante, page 72-74.) 
 
 i 
 
 
 V. ESTATE CLAUSE. 
 
 The general words and the hahcmlum limit the estate 
 mortgaged according to its nature and tenure,' and imme- 
 diately thereafter follows the clause for redemption, which 
 is the distinguishing feature of this instrument. The grant 
 passes the absolute or limited ownership of the mortgagor 
 on the land, and in most cases the absolute interest in the 
 fixtures* ; but where a limited interest only is parted with 
 by the mortgagor, or, for instance, where there is a mortgage 
 by sub-lease, the fixtures do not pass unless specifically 
 mentioneu,' and the right to remove them will remain in the 
 mortgagor." Except in the case of a grant in fee simple. 
 
 ' See Laing v. Tlic Ontario Loan and Savings Co., 46 Q. B. 114. 
 
 2 The Tntst and Loan Co. v. Lawrason, ante, page -^7, now in appeal. 
 
 5 See Deeds of Grant, 80-86. 
 
 * Langstaff v. Meagnc, 2 A. & E. 167. 
 
 5 Hawtrey v. Butlin, L. R.. 8 Q. B. 290. 
 
 * Deane Conveyancing, page 369. 
 
MORTGAGES OF LAND — PROVISO FOR REDEMPTION. 
 
 143 
 
 something more than the operative part, however framed, 
 is necessary to give the mortgagee a perfectly good title to 
 the fixtm'es.' 
 
 A mortgage of leaseholds is usually effected by way of 
 underlease, and not by assignment in order to escape lia- 
 bility in the covenants in case the}' are onerous. 
 
 ly 
 
 le 
 le, 
 
 VI. PROVISO FOR REDEMPTION. 
 
 The statutory form provides that the mortgage is to be 
 void on payment of the principal and interest due thereon 
 and the taxes, and on performance of statute labour ; but there 
 is no reconveying clause though the effect of a discharge 
 is to reconvey the property the same as if the mortgage in 
 question had never been made thereon." 
 
 When a mortgage contains only a proviso for making it 
 void on payment of the mortgage money, and a proviso to 
 sell and eject in default, but no covenant to pay, no liability 
 to pay is created by mere in*oof of the mortgage. There 
 must be evidence given of a loan or debt' ; where such evi- 
 dence is given, a promise to pay it will be implied* ; and no 
 action of covenant is maintainable on the proviso of a mort- 
 gage." So, where the proviso was, " in three equal pay- 
 ments to be respectively made," this was held to be insuth- 
 cient'"' ; but where a sealed agreement is entered into, by 
 which land is agreed to be conveyed for a stated sum, pay- 
 able in a specified manner, this was held to be a covenant/ 
 
 A mortgagee, when advancing money, cannot bargain for 
 the purchase of the property at a specified sum on default 
 of payment." 
 
 ' Deane Conveyancing, page 370. 
 -' R. S. O., cap. Ill, sec. 67. 
 ' Jackson V. Ycuniaiis, 28 CJ. B. 307. 
 4 Hall V. Morhy, 8 Q. B. 584. 
 ^ Martin v. Woods. T. T. 3 & 3 Vic. 
 ^ yackson v. Yionians. 19 C. P. 394. 
 7 Bcny V. Garrard, 32 Q. 13. 173. 
 " Fallon V. Kecnan, 12 Chy. 388. 
 
 2 
 
 53 
 
 Cw ."1 
 
 ^^ 
 
 s 
 
144 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 The effect of a statutory mortgage is said to be that, on 
 payment, the estate revests in the mortgagor.' In case the 
 mortgagor dies before jjayment, his personal representatives 
 are liable to pay the mortgage money, and if or when they 
 do pay it, the land goes to the heirs ; and this may be ma- 
 terial in the rather rare cases under our law, where the next 
 of kin are not the same persons as the heirs-at-law. In 
 case the mortgagee die before payment, his personal repre- 
 sentatives are entitled to the money, though, if the property 
 itself were foreclosed, it would descend to his heirs-at-law. 
 
 VII. PERSONAL COVENANT.^ 
 
 The covenant of the mortgagor to pay the mortgage 
 money and interest and observe the proviso for redemption 
 follows, and is the hold the mortgagee has on the personal 
 or other estate of the mortgagor, outside of the property 
 mortgaged. By means of this covenant he can sue the 
 mortgagor, and realize by writs of Ji fa in the sheriff's 
 hands ; and he can do this concurrently with the exercise 
 of any other remedies he may possess. 
 
 The omission of this clause is, therefore, a serious defect 
 in a mortgage, as, by it also, the interest in arrear may be 
 effectually obtained from a careless debtor. It iv. necessary 
 to specify the times and daj's, half-yearly or otherwise, on 
 which interest is to be paid, and if a penalty is to be enforced 
 for neglecting payment, a higher rate is first inserted, 
 adding, that, in case of prompt payment, a lower rate would 
 be accepted. This, in the eye of the Court of Chancery, 
 was a totally different thing fi -m covenanting to pay a 
 certain rate, and, in case of default, to pay a higher one ; 
 though it is difficult to see, if the difference is one of ex- 
 pression only.' Where there is a valid agreement, and not 
 a penalty, however, the Court will sustain a higher ratc^ ; 
 
 ' Hayes' Concise Conveyancer, page 259. 
 
 ' There is nothing noteworthy in the expanded form of this covenant in 
 mortgages under the Act. The payment is to be made in the terms of the 
 proviso at the days and times mentioned therein. 
 
 ? Deane Con., page 374. 
 
 * Wadchll V. McColl, 14 Gr, 211. 
 
MORTGAGES OF LAND — PROVISO FOR REDEMPTION. 
 
 145 
 
 and in the same way a mortgagor may make a vi,lid agree- 
 ment that the interest in arrears may be turned into 
 principal, thus compounding the interest. 
 
 In all mortgages executed after the 1st of July, 1880, 
 where the principal money or interest on a mortgage of 
 real estate is made payable on the sinking fund plan, or 
 on any plan under which the payments of principal money 
 and interest are blended, or on any plan which involves an 
 allowance of interest on stipulated repayments, no interest 
 whatever shall be chargeable, payable or recoverable, on 
 any part of the principal money advanced, unless the 
 mortgage contains a statement showing the amount of such 
 principal money, and the rate of interest chargeable thereon, 
 calculated yearly or half-yearly, not in advance.' 
 
 No rate of interest is recoverable beyond what is shewn 
 in such statement, if this rate is less than what would ])e 
 chargeable by virtue of any other provision, calculation or 
 stipulation in the mortgage.* 
 
 The same statute ' goes on to enact that — 
 
 No fine or penalty or rate of interest shall be stipulated 
 for, taken, reserved or exacted on any arrears of principal 
 or interest which shall have the effect of increasing the 
 charge on any such arrear beyond the rate of interest pay- 
 able on principal money not in arrear ; provided always, 
 that nothing in this section contained shall have the effect 
 of prohibiting a contract for the payment of interest on 
 arrears of interest or principal at any rate not greater than 
 the rate payable on principal money not in arrear.* 
 
 In c ase any sum is paid on account of any interest, fine 
 or penalty not chargeable, payable or recoverable under the 
 foregoing sections, such sums may be recovered back or 
 deducted from any other interest, fine or penalty chargeable, 
 payable or recoverable on the principal.' 
 
 CO 
 
 mm 
 
 00 
 
 C 
 
 X 
 
 
 
 ■^:> 
 
 s 
 
 t in 
 the 
 
 ' 43 Vic, cap. 42, sec. i (D.) 
 
 -' Ibid, sec. 2. 
 
 3 43 Vic, cap. 42 (D.) 
 
 * Ibid, sec. 3. 
 
 5 Ibid, sec. 4. 
 
 o's.c. 
 
 10 
 
146 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 Wherever any principal money or interest secured by 
 mortgage of real estate is not, under the terms of the 
 mortgage, payable till a time more than five years after the 
 (late of the mortgage, then, in case at any time after the 
 expiration of such five years, any person liable to pay or 
 entitled to redeem the mortgage, tenders or pays to the 
 person entitled to receive the money the amount due for 
 principal money and interest to the time of payment as 
 under the foregoing sections, together with three months' 
 further interest in lieu of notice, no further interest shall 
 be chargeable, payable or recoverable at any time there- 
 after on the principal money or interest due under the 
 mortgage.' 
 
 From the stringent terms of the statute, it is evident 
 that care must be taken in future in framing the clause as 
 to repayment. 
 
 C3 '* 
 
 VIII. OTHER COVENANTS. 
 
 Of other covenants entered into by the mortgagor, that of 
 insuring must be considered, especially if the security bo 
 house or mill property ; and the condition inserted that, in 
 the default of the mortgagor to do this, the mortgagee 
 may do so, and add to the debt the money so advanced. It 
 is sometimes made a condition also, though apparently un- 
 necessary, that in case the premises, or apart of them, are 
 burnt down, the money, if not payable to the mortgagee on 
 the face of the policy, be applied in re-building the premises 
 or repairing any portion of them destroyed by the fire. 
 
 Other covenants refer to repairing and to allowing the 
 mortgagee to enter and view the state of repair ; and to 
 leases, that the mortgagee do renew his lease within the 
 terms thereof, or do permit the mortgagee to do so at the 
 mortgagor's expense.* 
 
 As has been referred to before, the practice in convey- 
 ancing has come to be that the mortgagor gives absolute 
 
 ■ 43 Vic, cap. 42, sec. 5. 
 
 - As to action on the covenants after release of the Equity of Redemp- 
 tion, see North of Scotland Company v. German, 31 C. P. 349. 
 
MORTGAGES OF LAND — POW ER OF SALE OR LEASING. 1 47 
 
 covenants for title, probably for the reason that his mort- 
 gagee can make such terms with him as he pleases, and not 
 because there is any particular intrinsic value in having 
 absolute rather than qualified covenants. An action on these 
 covenants would entitle the mortgagee to his mortgage 
 money ; but this can more easily be obtained by an action 
 on the covenant for payment of the mortgage money; and 
 very few regard a title obtained under a power of sale as 
 more valuable because of absolute covenants in the mort- 
 
 gage.' 
 
 IX. powp:r of sale or leasing. 
 
 The statutory clause, giving a power to sell or lease on 
 default of payment, is a very important power. There may, 
 of course, be a valid mortgage without this power, inde- 
 pendent of the statute to be referred to i)resently, leaving 
 the mortgagee to the remedies of foreclosure and an action on 
 the covenant ; but it is usual, and, in acting for the 
 mortgagee, always advisable, to have a power of sale in- 
 serted in the mortgage. The mortgagee will desire it, if 
 possible, without giving any notice to the mortgagor. In 
 this rather unfair way he should, at least, extend ihe time 
 for default. Thus, it is better for the mortgagee to have 
 the clause read, that, on "default of payment for two 
 months, he may, without giving any notice, enter and sell, 
 etc.," than to have it on " default of payment for one 
 month, he may, on giving one months' notice, enter, etc." 
 The notice may be troublesome to serve, and it must be 
 strictly observed, and must be a valid notice. The power 
 of sale cannot be exercised by any person not within the 
 wording of the mortgage; and a stranger may not exercise 
 it unless expressly, or by force of the statute, the word 
 " assigns " is supplied.' When the statutory form of mortgage 
 is not used, the word assigns should never be omitted.^ 
 
 ' See Deane on Con. 382. See Chapter on Deeds of Grant as to Cove- 
 nants. As to concealing encumbrances, see Lovelace v. Harringtun, 27 
 Chy. 178. 
 
 ' Bradford v. Bcljicld, 2 Sim. 264. 
 
 s Saloway v. Straivbridge, i K. & J. 371 ; Townsend v. Wilson, i B. & 
 Aid. 608. 
 
 
 ^3 
 
 53 
 C 
 
 s 
 
148 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 A power of leasing must be executed by tbe pei'son 
 selected for tbat purpose, by tlie power, and not by any in- 
 dividual on whom, by reason of intestacy, the law casts the 
 estate ; and such a lease will not be confirmed by the 
 acceptance of rent by the remainderman.* 
 
 The conveyance to a purchaser by a mortgagee under his 
 power of sale i8,by grant,as owner ; and, having an equitable 
 authority to deal with the fee, an appointment would be 
 informal." Indeed, a purchaser having contracted with a 
 first mortgagee for a sale under a power of sale, is not 
 bound at law to accept a conveyance from the owners or 
 encumbrancers,' though most conveyancers would prefer 
 the latter way. 
 
 The sale may be made by private contract, and there is 
 no absolute necessity to advertise the estate for sale.* The 
 mortgagor's consent is not necessary, and his strenuous 
 opposition to a sale, as made at an undervalue, does not 
 invalidate it.* 
 
 As a fiduciary vendor, the mortgagee is bound to take 
 every reasonable precaution to prevent the property being 
 sacrificed at the sale." 
 
 A second mortgagee may sately purchase from the first, 
 selling under his power of sale,' evtn if his mortgage is 
 under the form of a trust for sale.* A mortgagee cannot 
 sell, however, pending a suit to redeem.* He cannot pur- 
 chase at his own sale, as he is in the position of a fiduciary 
 vendor in exercising his power of sale." 
 
 Mortgagees should use proper diligence to obtain the best 
 price, and should take care to satisfy themselves so as to 
 
 * Robson V. Flight, 3 N. R. 183. 
 
 = Hayes Concise Conveyancer, page 259. 
 3 Forstcr v. Haggart, 15 Q. B. 175. 
 
 * Dancy v. Durant, 1 De G. & J. 535. 
 5 Carder v. Morgan, 18 Ves. 344. 
 
 * Richmond v. Evans, 8 Gr. 508 ; Latch v. Furlong, 12 Grant, 303. 
 y Parkinson v. Hanbury, 1 Dr. & Sim. 143. 
 
 * Kirku'ood v. Thompson, 34 L. J. Chy. 305. 
 9 Rhodes v. Buckland, 16 Bea. 212. 
 
 ■o Jenkins v. Jones, 2 Giff. 99-108. 
 
MORTGAGES OF LAND — THE STATUTORY POWER OF SALE. 149 
 
 prevent a sacrifice* of the property, before they proceed to 
 sell. This is important in sales by private contract ; and 
 in sales by auction they should properly advertise the 
 intended sale." A trustee for sale may fix a reserved bid, 
 and buy in, if that bidding is not reached*; but he runs 
 risk in deferring a sale, or refusing a fair oft'er.* 
 
 A power to sell in order to raise a sum of money, implies, 
 it has been said, a power to mortgage, which is a conditional 
 sale*; but this is only the case when the purpose of the 
 trust will be answered by a mortgage, for if the intention 
 appears that a sale out and out shall be made, a mortgage 
 will not be a valid exercise of the power.' It seems that a 
 power to sell does not authorize either a partition' or an 
 exchange.' 
 
 Executors conveying under a power of sale should not 
 •covenant for themselves, their heirs, etc., in the deed for 
 good title, else they will be personally liable.® 
 
 After the power of sale is exercised, and the purchase 
 money paid with interest and costs, the balance belongs to 
 the mortgagor. In case there is a second mortgagee, and 
 that he has served notice of his claim, it is safer, instead of 
 inspecting his security, to get the consent of the mortgagor 
 to have it paid to such mortgagee. The better way, in cases 
 of difficulty, is to pay it into Court under the Act for that 
 purpose. 
 
 X. THE STATUTORY POWER OF SALE. 
 
 The foregoing remarks on power of sale apply, of course, 
 to mortgages where there is a power capable of being exer- 
 cised. However, in the event of nothing being said in the 
 
 * Latch V. Furlong, 12 Chy. 303. 
 
 * Prideaux Conveyancing, 125. 
 
 3 Re Peyton's Settlement, 30 Beav. 252. 
 
 * Fry V. Fry, 27 Beav. 144. 
 
 5 Mills V. Banks, 3 P, Wms. 9. 
 
 ^ Devaynes v. Robinson, 24 Beav. 86; Prideaux Con. 128. 
 
 7 McQueen v. Farquhar, 11 Ves. 467. 
 
 « Frith V. Osborne, L. R. 3 C. P. 61 3. 
 
 9 McDonald v. McDonald, 6 O. S. 109. 
 
 2- 
 
150 
 
 PKACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 is « 
 
 mortgage as to sale on default of payment of principal or 
 interest, or in the event of default being made in the cove- 
 nant to insure, the mortgagee has now ample statutory 
 remedies, by which he can sell, to protect himself in either 
 contingency. By Ontario Statute of 1879,' the mortgagee 
 of any hereditaments may, after six months' default, under 
 the terms of the mortgage, proceed to sell, either by public 
 auction or by private contract, in as full a manner as if the 
 power had been given to him expressly by contract. 
 
 A sale under this Act has many advantages to a pur- 
 chaser, not to be had where it takes place in pursuance of 
 the terms of the mortgage; for the purchaser's title is de- 
 clared to be valid though the sale be an improper one (sec. 
 4) ; and no duty is cast upon the purchaser to see to the 
 application of the purchase money — the receipt for the pur- 
 chase money is a sufficient discharge for him. Whatever 
 estate or interest in the mortgaged premises was held by the 
 mortgagor, can be, by deed, assigned or conveyed to the 
 purchaser (sec. 9) ; and every facility is afforded as to the 
 production of deeds and documents of title from the 
 mortgagor (sec. 10). No power to lease is given by the 
 Act, and the Act gives nothing except what it expressly em- 
 powers. What particularity is requisite, and how much 
 this Act may remedy, may be seen from the case of Bart- 
 lett V. Jail, in our Court of Chancery.* There the notice was 
 under the mortgage to be given to the mortgagor, his heirs, 
 executors, or administrators. He died, leaving an infant' 
 son three years old ; his widow was appointed administra- 
 trix. It was held insufficient to serve her with the notice 
 of sale, and the purchaser was called upon to shew that the 
 power under which he purchased was duly exercised. 
 
 The Act giving additional powers to mortgagees prescribes 
 with great minuteness the procedure to be followed, and it is 
 apprehended that it must be followed to the letter. A three 
 months' notice is necessary, a prescribed form is provided,* 
 
 * 42 Vic. cap. 20. 
 
 ' 28 Chy. 140. 
 
 3 See under Forms and Precedents. 
 
MORTGAGES OF LAND — DOWEU. 
 
 151 
 
 and the purchase money is directed to be paid to the parties 
 entitled. 
 
 Several objections have been taken to the English Act 
 (Lord Cranworth's Act, 23 & 24 Vic, cap. 145), of which 
 ours is only a slightly varied copy. In the first place, the 
 power cannot be exercised so soon as the ordinary power, 
 as six months must elapse before proceedings can be taken. 
 Again, three months' notice must be given, and a third 
 objection is the particularity to be observed in giving the 
 notice.' 
 
 It is apprehended that our Act will be availed of only 
 where an omis sion has been made to insert the power of 
 sale. 
 
 XI. DOWER. 
 
 In order to be able to sell or effectually dispose of the 
 property, it is necessary that the wife of the mortgagor join 
 as a party in the mortgage, for the purpose of barring her 
 dower therein. In so doing, she parts with her dower only 
 so far as may be necessary for the purpose of the security ; 
 and a purchaser must have her made a party in a subsequent 
 sale, in order to free it from dower." If a sale of a mort- 
 gaged estate is made by the Court on a mortgage in which 
 the wife has joined to bar her dower, it is sufficient, and she 
 need not join in the conveyance.' 
 
 And now, by a recent statute,* where an owner, whose 
 wife has been living apart from him for two years, under 
 such circumstances as would disentitle her to alimony, de- 
 sires to mortgage his lands free from her dower, he can do 
 so by applying to one of the Judges of the High Court of 
 Justice; and, if the evidence is satisfactory, an order may 
 be made dispensing with her concurrence for the purpose 
 of barring her dower ; but the order must state the value of 
 her dower, and it is to be paid or applied for her benefit ; 
 
 C0 
 
 C 
 
 s 
 
 ' Prideaux Con. 504. 
 » Forrest v. Lay cock, i8 Chy. 6ii. 
 < Moore v. Skinner, i Chy. Cha. 59. 
 * 44 Vic. cap. 14. 
 
162 
 
 TRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 and the cflfect of the order is the same as if she had duly 
 executed a deed jointly with her huabiind. (See 1.) 
 
 The 2nd softion is more useful, and authorizes an appli- 
 cation where the wife is a lunatic, hut not confined in an 
 asylum. The application must be made on the certificate 
 of the gaol surgeon wherever the wife resides, and of 
 another medical practitioner, to ])e named by the judge, 
 and an order similar to the one referred to in R. S. 0., cap. 
 126, may be made. This section applies to sales as well 
 as to mortgages.' 
 
 If the husband is seized of an estate in fee, her dower 
 attaches ; and a wife is entitled to dower out of equitable 
 estates, no matter whether she has married before 4 Will. 
 IV. or not.* A wife may not be entitled to dower if she has 
 elected to take something in lieu of it, or by a marriage 
 settlement, or by adultery. (Under these headings see 
 chapter on Deeds of Grant — Dower.) 
 
 The Dower Act, 42 Vic, cap. 20, 0., does not apply to 
 mortgages made before it was passed.* 
 
 XII. RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES. 
 
 is c: 
 
 Where there is a proviso in a mortgage that the mort- 
 gagor is to have possession until default, he is entitled to 
 retain such possession, and is not liable for rents nor 
 profits, nor for waste ^; but, where a decree for foreclosure 
 is obtained, it is otherwise." And now, where the mortgagor 
 is entitled, for the time being, to the possession or the 
 receipt of the rents and profits, and the mortgagee has given 
 no notice of his intention to take possession or to enter into 
 receijjt of the same, he can sue the mortgagee for possession, 
 or sue and distrain for the recovery of the rents and 
 profits.* 
 
 ' See Out. Stat. 42 Vic. cap. 22, as to effect of dower. 
 
 ' Mcintosh V. Wood, 15 Chy. 92. 
 
 ' Martindale v. Clarkson, 6 Ont. App. i. 
 
 ■• Wo/ci- V. Taylor, q Q. B. 609. 
 
 5 Cawthra v. ^'■:Guire, 5 L. J. 142. 
 
 " Ontario Judicature Act, 1881, cap. 5, sac. 17, sub-sec. 5. 
 
niSCIIAROKS OK MORTOAOE. 
 
 153 
 
 Where thero is no provifio that tlie in()rtga«,'or is ontithul 
 to posscHsioii till default, the mort^^aj^ee is entitled to poH- 
 Hcssion on the execution of the iuHtrumont ; and if the 
 mortgagor takes possession without such proviso, he is ten- 
 ant to the mortgagee. The intention of the parties will be 
 looked at where there is no redemise clause, in order to 
 come to the assistance of the mortgagor and sustain him in 
 possession until default.' 
 
 Whether a mortgagee has a landlord's remedies as to 
 distraining for arrears of interest under a statutory mort- 
 gage, where, in addition to the usual distress clause, there 
 is one for attornment by the mortgagor, is a matter of 
 doubt. The case of The Trust and Loan Company \. Lawra- 
 son is not yet decided in the Supreme Court.* There are 
 some statutory regulations and penalties relating to frauds 
 in sales and mortgages, but these refer to the fraudulent 
 concealment of any settlement, deed, will, etc., or falsifying 
 pedigrees ui)on which the title depends, and not ordinarily 
 to the inception of a sale or mortgage, unless it were made 
 part of the terms. 
 
 A mortgage cannot be rectified on a parol testimony going 
 to shew that it should include other property.' 
 
 As to subsequent proceedings of a mortgagor about which 
 a mortgagee has a right to complain, see Parrx. Monti/omery, 
 27 Chy. 521. 
 
 II. DISCHARGES OF MORTGAGE. 
 
 Under the provisions of The Registry Act,* any registered 
 mortgage may be discharged by a certificate in proper form, 
 witnessed and proved as other instruments, and registered 
 in the proper Registry Oflice. 
 
 ■ Supeiiur Loan and Sav!n<rs Society v. Lucas, 44 Q. B. 106. 
 
 - See note at the end of Chapter II., Title to Real and Persona! Prop- 
 erty. See supra. 
 
 » Dominion Loan Society v. Darling, 5 Ont. App. Rept. 576. 
 
 * R. S. O. cap. III. 
 
 2 
 
 S 
 
 c 
 
 i 
 
 s 
 
164 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 I 
 
 o $ 
 
 J5 ^ 
 
 The certiiicato, so registereil, discliar^cs the inort{^a{,'e and 
 rekiascs the lands mortj^aged, and also reconvcys the 
 original estate of the mortgagor to him ; or, in the event of 
 his death or assigning his equity of redemption, to his heirs, 
 executors, administrators or assigns, or any person claim- 
 ing lawfully hy, through, or under him or them. If only a 
 portion of the lands is to he discharged, then a release of 
 part of the mortgag< d premises is registered in a similar 
 way, and the particular portion of land so released must he 
 set out. 
 
 A certificate of a discharge of a mortgage is a peculiar 
 instance of a conveyance of land without the intervention 
 of a sealed instrument; and so, not heing made under seal, 
 it is held not to create an est pel against the recovery of 
 the deht, if not in truth paid.' ]3efore the registration, it 
 operates only as a receipt, and does not release the mort- 
 gagor from any of his covenants, discharge the mortgage, 
 or reconvey the estate. U] .m registration, however, the 
 mortgage is effectually discharged, and the legal estate re- 
 vested * ; and the survivor of one of several mortgagees,* or 
 one of several executors,' is competent to give such 
 discharge. » 
 
 Where a married woman is a mortgagee, or tlu; assignee 
 of a mortgagee, she can of herself effectually discharge a 
 mortgagf^, and her husband is no longer a necessary party 
 for tiiat purpose.** 
 
 The absence of the residence and occupation of the sub- 
 crihing witness on tlie face of a certificate of discharge is no 
 objection, since* the Act of 187iJ, if these are stated in the 
 affidavit"; and it has been actually tried whether it be 
 
 ' Bigclozi' V. Sliiccy, 14 C. P. 276. 
 
 " Trust and Loan Company v. Galloghcr, 7 P. 11. 97. 
 
 1 Dilkc V. Douglas, 5 Ont. App. 63. 
 
 * Ex parte Johnson, C P. K. 225. 
 "^ Ont. Stat. 44 Vic. cap. 10. 
 
 * Stodihiii V. StuJiiart, 39 y. B. 203. 
 
DISCHARGES OF M0UT«AOE. 
 
 155 
 
 8ufiQcient to have the jurat read " Toronto," instead of 
 "the city of Toronto," when the former was held sufficient.' 
 
 The mortgagor is entitled to tender the discharge to his 
 mortgagee, in order to have the same executed.* 
 
 ' Reid V. Whitehead, lo Chy. 446; and see this case as to one witness 
 taking the affidavit of the other. 
 
 » McLennan v, McLean, 27 Chy. 54, 
 
 'Tote. — The effect of a statutory discharge of mortgaRe on an estate tail 
 ia now before the Courts in a case of Lawlor v. Lawlor. The judgment in 
 the Court of Appeal has recently been given, but the case is now in appeal 
 to the Supreme Court. The question is not of such general interest, as 
 the anomaly of estates tail is of rare occurrence. 
 
 2 
 So 
 
 
CHAPTER VII. 
 
 ASSIGNMENTS. 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 II. Assignment of Leases. 
 
 III. Assignment of Mortgages. 
 
 IV. Choses in Action. 
 
 Particular Assignments 
 
 1. Stock, Shares, etc. 
 
 2. Copyright. 
 
 3. Patent Right. 
 
 4. Trade Marks, Designs. 
 
 5. Insurance Policies. 
 
 
 I. PEELIMINAEY. 
 
 The absolute sale of an interest in land, or chattels, etc., 
 is not f:5enerally comprehended under the same term as the 
 gale vjf a ruiht to an interest therehi. One transfer is called 
 a sale or purchase, and the other an assignment. Thus, 
 we have assignments of contracts, of mortgages, of leases, 
 of judgments, of vltoscn in tiction, etc., which are all rights 
 subsisting between parties, rather than absolute interests in 
 the subject matter of the transaction.' An assignment 
 
 •I CD 
 
 transfers the interest of one party, who is bound up in some 
 way with a third party. A sale contemplates only two 
 2)arties ordinarily— an assignment at least three, in some 
 assignments the consent of the three parties must be 
 obtained before either of the original parties can transfer 
 their interest in the contract in (piestion — in others such 
 consent is not necessary. The covenants originally sub- 
 sisting between the parties are not affected by a transfer to 
 an assignet', but such assignee may assume the burdens of 
 
 ■ A chose in action may mean both the subject matter of the thing in 
 question and also the right of action regarding it. 
 
ASSIGNMENTS — ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES. 
 
 157 
 
 the contract, and his assignor may he relieved of tii^ni hy 
 the third party. Or there may be no restriction at all, and 
 the assignee may as completely represent the original con- 
 tracting party, without the consent of the other, as the 
 person from whom he derives title would have done. 
 
 A reference will he made in this chapter to the assign- 
 ments about which a conveyancer may be expected to be 
 familiar. The assignment of leases and mortgages will be 
 considered lirst, not only on account of their connection with 
 real estate, but also from their importance. The other 
 assignments are more strictly chases in action, and refer to 
 personal property, which will be considered presently. 
 
 \n 
 
 II. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES. 
 
 0^ course, the first thing to be considered in the task of 
 af^">i^ning a lessee's interest, is to find out whether he has 
 the power of so doing — or rather, whether he is restricted 
 from so doing. If there is no covenant to the efiect that he 
 shall not assign without the license of the lessor, then he 
 has the necessary power. The covenant, not to assign or 
 sublet without leave, is not a proper or usual covenant'; 
 and, though in some cases it may be justifiable, it is gener- 
 ally unreasonable, and prejudicial to the parties concerned. 
 The tendency ib to restrain the lessee in the enjoyment of 
 the property and the free alienation thereof, and ought 
 never to be consented to in the lease of ground intended to 
 be built upon. The lessee ought to be unfettered as to his 
 enjoyment of the property and the free disposal of it ; and 
 it is unfair on the part of the lessor to insist on the lessee 
 obtaining his sanction before he can deal with it.' A cove- 
 nant not to assign does not affect an underlease* of the 
 premises for any period less than the whole term ; but an 
 underlease of the whole term is an assignment.* It is 
 doubtful whether the lessee cannot devise the whole term, 
 
 ■ Church V Brown, 15 Ves. 238; Prideaux Con. 18. 
 ' Greenwood Con. 50. 
 
 ' Crusoe d. Bleiicozve v. Bugby, 2 \Vm. Bl. 7G6. 
 < Bcardmaii v. Wilson, L. K. 4 C. P. 57. 
 
 2 
 
 r- 
 o 
 
 ■•'1 
 
158 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 ^ ' c; 
 
 V 
 
 V 
 
 as the authorities are conflicting on that point'; it is de- 
 cided that a deposit of a lease for security is not a breach 
 of covenant to assign or underlet." It would seem, from the 
 authorities, that a covenant not to underlet prohibits an 
 assignment.' 
 
 Having decided whether or not the lessee's interest can 
 be assigned, or, having obtained the necessary license or 
 consent, it will be desirable that the assignee understand 
 his exact position relatively to his immediate lessor, and to 
 his lessor's lessor. 
 
 The original lessor is not much injured by an assign- 
 ment. No assignment affects his rights on bis lease — he 
 can always sue Jus lessee for the rent, and ho can ordinarily 
 distrain, no matter who is on the premises demised. He is 
 hurt by an assignment only where the tenant in posses3ion 
 lessens the value of the property, as where the new tenant 
 is less responsible for breaches of covenant committed 
 by him while in possession. 
 
 The assignee is liable on all covenants which run with 
 the land by virtue of what is called privity of estate^ ; but 
 the lessee is also liable on his contract, by virtue of privity 
 of contract.* The assignee is liable for breaches of cove- 
 nant by himself ; but, by aosigning over, he may escape all 
 further liability. If the estate pass into the hands of a 
 pauper, an action by virtue of the privity of the estate 
 would not be worth much, though the original lessor would 
 always have his action against the person with whom he 
 contracted. 
 
 ' Pridenux Con. 17. 
 » Doc d. Pitt V. Hogg, 4 D. & R. 226. 
 3 Prideaux Con. iS. 
 
 « But, sMice the Act relating to choses in action, the covenants may be 
 assignable by contract, lis Haislcy. 44 U C. K. 345. 
 
 « See Addison on Contracts, chap. Assignment, etc,, of Contracts. In 
 order that a covenant may run with the land, it must be inherent in the 
 land . that is to say, the performance, or non-performance of it, must affect 
 the nature, quality, or value of the thing demised, and its mode of enjoy- 
 ment. If the covenant relates to things actually in existence, the fact that 
 "assigns " is not expressly mentioned in the covenant is immaterial ; but, 
 if the covenant relates to things not in existence, it would appear that, in 
 order to bind assigns, they should bo expressly mentioned — Spemer's 
 Case, 5 Co. 176 i. As to future erections and buildings, see Minshcll v 
 Oitkcs, 2 H. & N. 793. 
 
ASSIGNMENTS ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES. 
 
 159 
 
 jl 
 
 The lessee's joosition is, that he is always liable to be sued 
 on the covenants he has entered into, but not being in 
 occupation of the premises, he is not liable to be distrained 
 upon for the rent ; and the fact that the lessor accepted the 
 assignee as his tenant, does not relieve the original lessor 
 from his express covenant to pay rent.* Though the 
 assignee be accepted by the lessor, as to the rent, it would 
 seem that the lessee would still be liable in an action on his 
 covenants.* He has the responsibility of the lease on his 
 shoulders for the whole term, and the lessor can always 
 look to him first. As a matter of fact, the lessor looks first 
 to the goods on the premises demised, if there are any goods 
 leviable, because the extraordinary remedy of distress is 
 more summarv, and the value sooner realized, than bv the 
 usual action. But the lessee looks on with the certainty 
 before him, that, unless the goods realize sufficient, he will 
 have to supply the deficiency. 
 
 In regard to the other covenants, he is in somewhat the 
 same position, though, in practical life, he is not liable to 
 the same extent. If his tenant pay the rent, the other 
 difficulties as to covenants need not be seriously regarded. 
 
 The assignee's position is, that he is liable for the rent, 
 for all covenants into which he has entered with the 
 lessee, and for all covenants that run with the land to the 
 lessor. 
 
 As to the first, if he does not pay the rent, the ordinary 
 remedies by distress of the lessor, or by suit frora his 
 assignor, c9,n be exercised against him ; or, if lie makes 
 default in payment, his assignor can pay the rent, and then 
 sue him for the same, with costs and damages in connection 
 with such payment." Ordinarily the same is true of what- 
 ever the lessee is obliged to do, which the assignee ought to 
 have done. 
 
 In regard to any covena i .- ntered into between tlit 
 assignee and the lessee, thej, course, speak for tlu-m- 
 
 1/ 
 
 o 
 
 -A 
 
 ■ Stinson V. Mnfrill, S Q. F. ^/i, — 
 
 ' Moiifg^omery v Speucc, 23 (,). B. 39 ^. 
 
 3 Askford V Hack, 6 Q. B. 541. 
 
160 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 r 
 
 selves, and the assignee may find two landlords over him ; 
 but if he fulfil the terms of the original lease, he will have 
 nothing to fear from the lessor, and he should not enter 
 into any further obligations with the lessee, without being 
 prepared to fulfil them also. He can only be bound to the 
 lessee by express covenants in the deed of assignment ; and 
 every assignment of a lease must be by deed. 
 
 Covenants between landlord and tenant, or lessee and 
 reversioner, affecting the value or enjoj'ment of the property 
 by the lessee during the term, are annexed to the estate 
 granted, and run with the land so long as that estate con- 
 tinues ; and the right of action upon them vests in the 
 assignee of the term.^ So that the assignee can call on the 
 lessee to repair, to cleanse and repair water-courses, to 
 supply the premises with water ; can call for a renewal, 
 and is entitled to protection under the covenant for quiet 
 enjoj'ment, if such covenants are incident to the lease, 
 though he be not named therein. 
 
 On the other hand, he will equally be liable on all cove- 
 nants incident to the estate he has, notwithstanding the 
 word " assigns " be not named in the histrument creating 
 the same, but only, however, for breaches of the same during 
 the time the privity of estate existed. 
 
 The mutu;i1 ' .ibilities extended at Common Law only to 
 the original lessor on the one hand, and any lessee or 
 assignee of a lessee on the other ; but since the passing of 
 the Act 3*2 Hen. VHI. cap. 34, they apply to the assignees 
 of both the original parties. And since the Act relating to 
 choses in Action now Revised Statutes Out. cap. 116, cove- 
 nants running with the land, as well as other covenants, 
 may be assigned by the conveyances between the parties ; 
 and the assignee can sue in his own name.- 
 
 The lessor's assignee cannot recover rent accrued due 
 before the assignmenc to him'; and if the lessor assigns 
 
 ^ ' Adiiison on Contracts, 777. 
 ■■' Re Haislcy 44 Q B. 345. 
 3 Wittrock V. Halliiuan, 13 Q. B. 135. 
 
ASSIGNMENTS — ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES. 
 
 161 
 
 of 
 
 ?es 
 to 
 
 re- 
 is, 
 i's; 
 
 his reversion before the rent becomes due, payment to his 
 assignee is good.' 
 
 Unless all the estate of the lessee comes in and vests in 
 the assignee, the original lessor cannot recover rent in an 
 action on the covenant ' ; and if it turns out that the party 
 sued on debt for rent is not an assignee of the premises, 
 but at most only an under-lessee for a part of the term, 
 there can be no action maintained against him.* 
 
 If the lessee covenants to insure in the name of the 
 lessor, the insurance money to be expended in the erection 
 of new buildings, the assignee will be bound by it — it is a 
 covenant running with the land.* 
 
 Sometimes the equities subsisting between the original 
 parties will hold good in the hands of their assignees, as 
 where buildings are erected on the understanding that they 
 are to be removed at the end of the term.* 
 
 The position of any subsequent assignee does not differ 
 from that of the lessee, or the first assignee under him, so 
 far as the lessor is concerned ; but each assignee is bound 
 by the terms of his assignment to his immediate assignor. 
 He is bound towards the lessor only so long as the privity 
 of estate continues. 
 
 Every assignee claiming under a lessee is bound by the 
 privity of estate only where he is clothed with the same 
 estate as that which the lessee had on the land, at the time 
 the covenants were entered into.* An under-lessee, there- 
 fore, is not responsible upon the covenants, inasmuch as he 
 is not possessed of the estate to which they are annexed.' 
 
 In order to avoid any conflict with the original lessor, it 
 is desirable, if possible, to get an under-lease for the whole 
 term less one day, and, as no privity of estate exists be- 
 
 2 
 
 00 
 
 3 
 
 ue 
 ns 
 
 ' McDviigall v. Young, Don. in. 
 
 = Av.ais V. Corbett, i Q. B. 303. 
 
 3 Lau'lor v. Sutherland, g Q. B. 205. 
 
 * Douglas V. Murphy. 16 Q. B. 113. 
 
 s Close V. Belmont, 22 Chy. 317. 
 
 '' Addison on Contracts, 779. 
 
 7 Holford V. Hatch, i Doug. 18O; Derby v. Taylor, i East, 502. 
 
 o's.c. 11 
 
162 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVKYANCINO. 
 
 tween the under-tenant and the lessor, the former ia affected 
 only by the covenants in the under-lease — unless by virtue 
 of the Revised Statute alluded to. !^^ort;^ages of leaseholds 
 are made in this way ; and', as the mortgagor remains in 
 possession, and is answerable to his lessor by di stresR, it is 
 the desirable way for many reasons. 
 
 The conditions in an under-lease should correspond with 
 those in the original lease ; the fact that they do not, 
 may enable a purchaser to rescind his contract'; and a 
 contract cannot be specitically enforced against a purchaser 
 of a lease when it is in fact a sub-lease.* 
 
 The same covenants in the lease and in the under-lease 
 would seem to be construed in the same way, except the 
 covenant to repair ; for, though the covenants may be in 
 the same words, if the3'' are entered into at difTerent times, 
 they will be construed with reference to the state of the 
 premises when each began to operate.* The lessee cannot 
 recover from his under-lessee, as special damage, the value 
 of a lease forfeited for non-repair, unless it appears that the 
 forfeiture was solely owing to the under-lessee's non- 
 repair.* 
 
 III. ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 
 Where a mortgagee, who is ordinarily engaged in selling 
 or buying mortgages, wishes to turn his security into ready 
 money, he looks out for some one who can take his place. 
 In the event, of course, of his mortgage being over-due, or 
 in default, his remedies are numerous, though slow, and he 
 may be anxious to assign his security. 
 
 The assignee will remember that, unless a man wants 
 money, he will not sacrifice a good security ; and that the 
 best evidence, sometimes, of a security being not so good as 
 it looks, is the fact of its being offered at an undervalue. 
 
 • Waring v. Hogarth, i Ry. & Mo. 39; Flight v. Booth, 1 Bing. N. C. 
 377- 
 
 " Brumfit V. Martin, 30 L. T. 98. 
 3 Walker v. Hation, 10 M. & W. 249. 
 
 * Clow V. Brogdcn, 2 M. & G. 39. 
 
ASSICNMENTS — ASSIGNMENT OF JIORTGACES. 
 
 163 
 
 ice. 
 
 Lnts 
 
 Itho 
 
 as 
 
 lue. 
 
 I.e. 
 
 The two things referred to under the chapter on mortgages 
 must therefore be considered : — 
 
 Ist. Is the security ample for the money ? and, 
 2nd. Is the title of the mortgagor a marketable one ? 
 
 Where these queries arc satisfactorily answered, it is, of 
 course, desirable, if acting for the assignee — the new pur- 
 chaser — that the mortgagor be made a party to the transfer, 
 and that the original parties both covenant to pay the 
 money advanced. The mortgagee, though probably disposed 
 to demur to this, cannot consistently refuse, if he lays any 
 stress upon the personal covenant of his mortgagor. 
 
 If the assignee is satisfied with the land or chattels as 
 security, he need not insist on the personal covenants ; but, 
 as was remarked, they are often most important, and the 
 advice of the conveyancer will always be to get them, if 
 possible. A mortgagee in possession cannot safely transfer 
 his securities without the assent of the mortgagor." 
 
 It is desirable, on a transfer in this way, to get the 
 amount ascertained, as the assignee takes a mortgage sub- 
 ject to whatever e(piities there may be between the original 
 parties — and first amongst these would be an unacknow- 
 ledged payment, for either principal or interest, in the 
 mortgage. Unless the mortgagor does not intervene in the 
 taking of the accounts, the assignee is bound by the state 
 of the account between him and the mortgagee''; and the 
 equities extend not only to the state of the account, but also 
 to the same equities as affect it in the hands of the mort- 
 gagee.' The purchaser is recommended to communicate 
 with the mortgagor; if he refrains from doing so, his 
 assignment is subject to all existing equities, though he 
 may not have actual notice of them.'' In fact, the position 
 of an assignee of a mortgage, is reduced by the authorities 
 to that of an assignee of a promissory note after maturity, 
 
 ' Hayes' Con. 402. 
 
 = Goodcrliatn v. Dc Grassi, 2 Chy. 135. 
 3 McPherson v. Dougan, 9 Chy. 25S, 
 •* Tutten V. Douglas, 15 Chy. 12G. 
 
 CO 
 
 00 
 
 o 
 
 m 
 
164 
 
 rn.VCTICAL CONVKYANCINO. 
 
 s 
 
 -, Q CI. 
 
 5f= i: 
 
 or other chose in action, and he takes it subject to all tho 
 equities regarding it.' 
 
 Where a purchaser, having given a mortgage to raise the 
 balance of purchase money, paid off a prior mortgage on 
 the property which his vendor covenanted to pay, it was 
 held that he could not deduct the money so paid by him 
 from his own mortgage, when it passed into the hands of 
 an assignee with notice of the facts.* 
 
 The difficulties attending the case of a mortgagee in pos- 
 session are at once apparent. But there is nothing to pre- 
 vent a mortgagee from taking possession at a fair and 
 reasonable rent agreed upon between them ; and, in such a 
 case, the mortgagee is not a "mortgagee in possession," in 
 the technical sense of the term, though a subsequent in- 
 cumbrancer prior to the first mortgagee entering into pos- 
 session is not bound by such an arrangement ; and the first 
 mortgagee may be liable beyond the amount stipulated 
 for.' 
 
 An assignee of several mortgages from the same person, 
 though of different estates, may, if the legal right of redemp- 
 tion be lost, insist on consolidating his securities — that is, 
 that one security shall not be redeemed unless all the others 
 are redeemed also.^ 
 
 This right of consolidating is not the same as tacking, 
 which is abolished in this Province by statute. Tacking is 
 the right to throw a series of debts on the same estate — 
 consolidating is the right to make separate estates liable 
 for one consolidated debt.' This right is not affected by 
 notice, and it applies not only against the mortgagor, but 
 against any assignee of the equity of redemption. But, 
 where the equities of redemption in this respect are 
 distinct, the rule does not apply. 
 
 ' Elliott V. McConnell, 21 Chy. 276; Baskerville v. Ottei'son, 20 Chy. 
 379- 
 » Egleson v. Home, 5 Ont. App. Rep. 566. 
 3 Court V. Holland, 29 Grant 19. 
 •» Fisher on Mortgages, 679. 
 5 Deane Con, 276. 
 
ASSIGNMENTS — ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 105 
 
 Thetransferooof a movt<^ap;c cannot stand in any difTuient 
 character, or hold any different position, from that of the 
 mortgagee himself, although the mortgagor may not have 
 been a party to the transfer. Every mortgagor has a 
 right to a reconveyance of the mortgaged property npon 
 payment of the money due upon the mortgage ; and the 
 mortgagee is charged with the duty of making such recon- 
 veyance upon such payment being made. 
 
 Where, therefore, a mortgagee, having, besides the i)ro- 
 perty mortgaged, certain promissory notes made by ilic 
 mortgagor as collateral security for his debts, transferred 
 the mortgage without assigning the collateral securities, it 
 was held that he was not entitled to sever the debt from 
 the securities, and an injunction granted against his pro- 
 ceedings at law to recover the amount of one of the notes, 
 pending a suit instituted by the mortgagor to redeem and 
 settle the equities of the parties, was sustained.' 
 
 It is said that in a transfer of a mortgage it is important 
 to expressly recognize the power of sale where the mortgagor 
 is a party and no new power of sale given.' 
 
 There are three things to be noticed in the Deed of 
 Transfer, or Assignment of a mortgage : 
 
 1st. The assignment of the mortgage debt. 
 
 "o-^^fo^ 
 
 2nd. The conveyance of the property subject to redemp- 
 tion. 
 
 8rd. A covenant by the transferor that he has done no 
 act to prevent him from making the transfer. 
 
 The assignee can, since the Act^ making choses in action 
 assignable, sue on the mortgage debt in his own name. 
 Unless the amount of the mortgage debt is ascertained in 
 some way, so as to bind the mortgagor, the assignee takes 
 subject to any equities between him and the mortgagee*; 
 and in order that this may be determined satisfactorily, it 
 
 ' Walkcy V. yoiii's, L. R. i P. C. App. 50. 
 
 " Young V. Roberts, 15 Beav. 558. 
 
 ■' R. S. O. cap. 116, sec. 7. 
 
 < Martin v. Bearmau, 45 Q. B. 205. 
 
IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (AAT-3) 
 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 2.2 
 
 z - m 
 
 U lllll 1.6 
 
 — 6' 
 
 V] 
 
 ^M 
 
 % 
 
 
 (S*! 
 
 /.^ 
 
 >^ 
 
 ' '^'"W 
 
 '/ 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 33 WEST MA*N STREET 
 
 WEBSTER. NY 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 

 
 
166 
 
 PBACTICAI. CONVBTANCIKO. 
 
 i 
 
 1 
 
 CI cc 
 
 is recommended that the mortgagor be made a party to the 
 assignment. 
 
 A mortgagee who agrees to be paid his money, or is 
 being paid off by a party other than the mortgagor, is not 
 bomid to assign his mortgage, or give the covenant in ques- 
 tion. He can be called upon only to execute a discharge 
 of his mortgage. 
 
 It is not necessary that the mortgage debt should be 
 assigned on a transfer in order to retain its priority * ; but 
 it is imprudent not to do so, as there may be a question if 
 the transferee can rely on the old security in the absence of 
 such assignment, and a mesne encumbrancer may argue 
 that the debt was extinguished. 
 
 The proper technical words to pass an estate in lands 
 and tenements in an assignment of a mortgage are, "assign, 
 transfer and set over,' " and the lands as well as the mort- 
 gage debt must be assigned. When a conveyance with the 
 words " bargained, sold, assigned, and transferred '* unto 
 the Assignee " his heirs and assigns, the annexed mortgage 
 and all the right, title and interest therein " of the assignor 
 " to have and to hold the same unto the said,t&c., his heirs 
 and assigns, to his and their sole use forever," it was held 
 that these wurds, though sufiicicnt in a will, would not pass 
 the land in a mortgage.* Nor will the land mortgaged pass 
 where an endorsement was to the effect of assigning to the 
 purchaser, " his executors, administrators, and assigns all 
 his right, title and interest in and to the within mortgage"* ; 
 but the estate will pass where the interest therein is trans- 
 ferred in the Jmhcmlum, though the granting part of the 
 deed transfers the indenture only.' The absence of a seal, 
 even where it purported to be under seal, would seem to be 
 fatal.* 
 
 * Phillipi V. Gutteriilgc. 4 De G. & J. 5JI ; Wafli v. Sytnes. i De G. M. 
 & J. 240. 
 
 ' Watt V FeaJer. 12 C. P. 254. 
 
 3 Auitin V. lioulton. i(> C. I'. 318. 
 
 * Moran v. Cinric, 8 C. V. 60. 
 
 5 Dot ./. Wood V. Fox. 3 y. II. 134. 
 
 * Tiffany v. Clarke, Chy. 474. 
 
AS8I0NHEMTS — OTHER CHOBES IN ACTION. 
 
 167 
 
 V. OTHER CIIOSES IN ACTION. 
 
 By Revised Statutes of Ontario, cap. 116, see. 7 " every 
 <lebt and chose in action arising out of contract shall be 
 assignable at law by any form of writing, but subject to 
 such conditions or restrictions with respect to the right of 
 transfer as are contained in the original contract ; and the 
 assignee thereof shall sue thereon in his own name in such 
 action, and for such relief as the original holder or assignor 
 of such chose in action, would be entitled to sue for in any 
 court of law in this Province." 
 
 Choses in Action is a very comprehensive term. Besides 
 debts, contracts, and other obligations, it includes every- 
 thing arising out of contract (not being a tort) ; so that 
 mortgages' and lenses,' so far as the obligations to pay the 
 debt or the rent, and observe the covenants, are choses in 
 action. A verdict,* or a judgment (even on a tort*), is 
 assignable ; and so are bonds and all rights to personal 
 property not in possession but which may be enforced by 
 action, demands arising out of torts as well as contracts.* 
 
 The Htntute, it will be observed, requires the assignment 
 to be made in writing in order to be valid at law, but no 
 particular form of writing is suggested. At the time that 
 the original statute making choncH in action transferable, 
 was passed (35 Vic. cap. 12. 0.) there was a distinction bt;- 
 l.veen the phrases at law and in cqidttf. Certain rights 
 were enforceable only in the Court of Chancery as admin- 
 istering what was technically known as Equity. Auiongst 
 these rights the very fri'(|uciit cases of e(|uitable assign- 
 ments of choses in action wore to be found, which the Court 
 of Chancery gave effect to wherever it was possible to do 
 so, notwithstanding that tlio writing was very informal, or 
 
 i 
 
 ' Martin v. Bcarman, 45 Q. Ji. 205. 
 
 » Re Haiiley, 44 y. B. 345. 
 
 3 AtuUrsoH V. Radcliffe, Iv B. & E. 817. 
 
 < Ex parte Charles, 14 liast, 197. 
 
 5 See cases in Kehoe, Choses in Action, Chapter Particular Assignments, 
 as to what have been held to be assi^^nable. Kent accruing due is not a 
 chose in action. Harris v. Meyers, 2 Chy. Cha. I2t. 
 
p 
 
 168 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 s 
 
 I 
 
 i 
 
 tliat there was no written assignment at all/ The Court 
 looked at the conduct of the parties, and if everything had 
 been done that was possible to constitute an assignment, 
 the particular form or means adopted was not regarded as 
 material. The Act of 1872, referred to, was passed with 
 this doctrine of the Court of Chancery in force ; and it 
 empowered the courts of law to recognize assignments of 
 chose* in action at the suit of the assignee, provided he was 
 fortified with some written document. The Revised Statute 
 left untouched the law merchant as to Bills and Notes. In 
 ]3ills of Lading it transferred the rights in respect of the 
 contract contained therein to the assignee, along with the 
 property which always passed in such contracts. In ware- 
 house receipts, etc., intended to be transferred collaterally, 
 it made a somewhat similar provision as to bills of lading, 
 that they could be transferred by endorsement. 
 
 The assignment of Promissory notes, bills of exchange, 
 warehouse receipts, is generally effected by endorsement 
 either under the custom of the law merchant or the fore- 
 going and some other statutes, but a consideration of them 
 is not within the scope of this work. 
 
 In regard to the assignment of choses in action, very little 
 can be said from a conveyancer's standpoint.' 
 
 Choses ill action is one of the two divisions of personal 
 property to be found in the old writers. With a few unim- 
 portant exceptions they were not assignable at law. Obser- 
 vations on such assignments as were formerly held to avail 
 in equity might be useful now in assignments under our 
 statute. Mr. Lewis in his Principles of Conveyancing has 
 gone very fully into the subject, and his remarks are the 
 
 • Bunten y. Georgen, 19 Chy, 168 ; see cases in Kehoe, onte, page 43. 
 
 = It will scarcely be for a conveyancer to consider whether or not an 
 a<;signment in writing is now necessary, or whether the rules which hereto- 
 fore governed the Court of (Chancery in effecting equitable assignments will 
 now be invoked in all the Divisional Courts of the High Court of Justice. 
 If an equitable assignment could be made without a written document, the 
 Courts of Law, after the Administration of Justice Acts, would have been 
 obliged, in obvious cases, to recognize it. Since the Judicature Act of 
 1 88 1, all the Courts must apparently be construed as Equity Courts ; and 
 the assignee of a chmc in action may feal disposed to offer evidences of 
 the transfer without any written document. 
 
ASSIGNMENTS — OTHKR CHOSE8 IN ACTION. 
 
 169 
 
 more valuable, as few Enprlish writers have taken much 
 pains to consider the question at nil. The main feature of 
 an assignment formerly was the power of attorney enabling 
 the assignee to sue in the name of the assignor. This is of 
 no practical utility now, but the otiier parts of the transfer 
 are important. 
 
 A peculiar feature of cho8eg in action, as distinguished 
 from chosea in possession, is that the title of the former 
 cannot be concealed from a purchaser. Covenants for title 
 were, however, exacted from the owner, and for this purpose, 
 amongst others, the transfer was suggested to be by deed. 
 As to the latter point, great stress was laid on the fact of a 
 conclusive receipt by means of a sealed instrument ; that 
 if there was no consideration, if it was a gift, a deed would 
 be necessary as in the case of all gifts ; and that the con- 
 tents of a deed were not easily varied by subsequent 
 conversations or letters, etc. 
 
 The covenants for title referred to the existence and 
 vahdity of the chose — power to assign in manner previously 
 set out — quiet enjoyment and power to realize and recover 
 therein, and, lastly, further assurance, which was a con- 
 ditional covenant to do certain things on request. The 
 deed of transfer had its testatum clause and sometimes a 
 habendum, though the uselessness of this was conceded — its 
 recitals setting out any mesne assignments — its parcels, so 
 called — describing the choses, its words of transfer, and, 
 most important of all, its power of Attorney. (See 
 Forms.) 
 
 It is apprehended that the mode of transferring a chose 
 in action, where there is no consideration, where it is a gift, 
 is not altered by our statute, and that, as in the case of 
 other personal property, a deed is still requisite, unless 
 the property passes on delivery and that such delivery is 
 complete and irrevocable.* 
 
 As to this, the act of the donor must place the fund or 
 debt out of his unrestrained control, and appropriate it to 
 the donee : and that will be sufficient, unless there is a 
 
 Lewis' Principles of Conveyancing. 140. 
 

 170 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVETANOINO. 
 
 i 
 
 I 
 
 
 proper method of traiiBfer recognized by the law, as in the 
 case of stockH. 
 
 And thus, in the case of a simple contract debt not 
 due by any instrument, notice of the transfer by the donor 
 to the debtor will place the debt out of the donor's control ; 
 so that if the debtor should pay to the donee, this notice 
 would in equity oiierate ns a warrant to him to do so ; it 
 is tantamount to delivery, and makes the debtor a trustee, 
 and is a binding equitable assignment.' 
 
 It is sutliciuiit if the donor declares himself a trustee of 
 the (ho$€ in avtion — it is considered as assigned in equity.' 
 
 If there is a particular fund out of which the money is to 
 be paid, it will be desirable to have that pointed out*; and 
 the debts,* dividends,* insurances,* shares,' or moneys * in- 
 tended to be transferred should be sufficiently identified. 
 Tho assignment must bo expressly assented to on the part 
 of the asHi;i[noc* ; and if it is hampered with any conditions, 
 these must be fuliillcd before the benefit of the assignment 
 passes.'* The assignee must possess the beneficial interest 
 and his assignment be complete before his right of action 
 can be maintained." If tho debtor, trustee, or other person 
 liable in respect of a debt or clioge in (Wtion, shall have had 
 notice that such assignment is disputed by the assignor or 
 any one claiming under him, or of any other opposing or 
 contlicting claims to such debt or chose in action, he shall 
 be entitled, if he thinks lit, to call upon the several persons 
 making claitn thereto to interplead concerning tho same ; 
 or he may, if he think fit, pay the same into the High 
 
 ' DcarU v. ttall, 3 Kiiss. i. 48; Burn v. Carvallo, 4 M. & K. 702-3. 
 ' Wilkinson v. Wilkiusmi, 4 Jur. N. S. 47. 
 * See Farquhar v. Thf City of Toronto, 12 Chy. 186, 
 « Kerrw i'fiuie, 2j Chy. 525. 
 '■ In re Irving L. K. 7 Chy. D. 419. , 
 " Chonne v. Baylis, 31 l^eav. 351. 
 7 Lanibe v. Orton, i Dr. & Sm. i.:5. 
 " Wtitson V. Wellington, i Kuss. & M, 602. 
 '' Scott V. Purcher, j Mer. 602. 
 " Mitir V. Wiuiiii-ll, 14 Chy. 4S8. 
 " Wood \. Ml- Alpine, i Oat. Ai'p. 234; Wellington v. Chard, zz C. P. 518. 
 
A8BIONMEMT8 — PARTICULAR A88IONMF.NTU. 
 
 171 
 
 Court of Justice under and in conformity with the provisions 
 of law for the relief of Trustees.' 
 
 Whether the asHsignmont he a gift, or for value, delivery 
 is desirahle, as it is useful to prevent subsoqueiit alienation 
 without the knowledge of the assignee. If an assignee 
 gets stock transferred to him, or gives notice of his interest 
 therein to the debtor or trustee of the chose before any prior 
 assignee can do so, he will be protected against such 
 assignee if he has no notice of a prior interest — but not if 
 he has such notice. 
 
 'Where the Kubject of the assignment is a written con- 
 tract, as for a sale of land or chattels, it is usual to assign 
 by endorsement on the document itsc^lf ; and this plan will 
 be found to possess many advantages. 
 
 The clause a<lding a power of attorney, as a relic of what 
 was indispensable before the Act of 1872, is usually inserted. 
 Its usefulness appears to be gone. 
 
 Some particular assignments are added Iktc, without 
 entering into the enquiry whether they are all strictly chosen 
 in action. Clioses in possession will be considered under the 
 chapter on I'erHonal Property, whicli see.* 
 
 '. 518. 
 
 IV. PAUTICULAIl ASSKINMKNTS. 
 
 1. Stocks and Shares. Stock, in Joint Stock Com- 
 panies, cannot be validly transferred (unless by sale und(;r 
 execution) until the entry thereof is made in the propttr 
 books of the company ; and sueh entry may be refused to be 
 made by tbe directors of the company if there are any un- 
 paid calls on the stock. 
 
 It is apprehended that this is the practice in reference to 
 the transfer of stocks or shares in banks and all such cor- 
 porations, subject to some sju'ciai details in their individual 
 charters. An Act to nuiend tlie IJankin^ Act (1H75>)' pi"<>- 
 
 ' 44 Vic. cap. 5. sec. 17, sub-snc. 6. 
 
 ' Chosfs in Ailion do not coiiu; withii) the pruv isions of the Act respect- 
 iriR sales and niurtgagos of p.'rsunal prui»erty s>> as to recjuire registration. 
 See post. 
 
 i 42 Vic. cap. 45, D. 
 
 i 
 
 ' C3 
 
172 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 vidcfl that tho HharoH of tho capital Htock of tlio bank 8hall 
 he held and adjudged to ho. pdrBonal estate, and shall be 
 assignable and traiiHferahlo at the chief plac(> of busincHS 
 of the bank, or at any of its branohcH, which the directors 
 Khali appoint for that purpoHo, and according to hucIi form 
 as the directors shall prescribe ; bnt no assignment or 
 transfer shall be valid, nnlcss it Im) made and registered 
 and accepted by the parties to whom the transfer is made 
 in a book or books, to be kept by tho directors for that pur- 
 ]K)se, nor until the person or persons making the same 
 shall, if required by the bank, jtreviously discharge all 
 his, her or their debts or liabiHties to the bank, wliiuh may 
 exceed in amount the remaining stock, if any, belonging 
 to such iK'rson or persons valued at the then current rate ; 
 and no fractional part or parts of a share or less than a 
 whole share shall be assignable or transferable. 
 
 The practice of the Stock Exchange in England is, that 
 tho broker who buys shares, prepares the transfer deed and 
 tenders it to the selling broker for execution ; he pays the 
 price on the transfer being transfeired to him (executed by 
 the vendor, and accompanied by the vendor's certilicate of 
 proprietorship. It is not the duty of the vendor, or of the 
 selling broker, to get tho transfer registered. All he has to 
 do is to execute the transfer deed and return it to the pur- 
 chaser. It is then the duty of the latter to execute it, and 
 leave it, with the certificates of proprietorship, at the office 
 of the company for registration and' for new certificates of 
 proprietorship, to be granted to him in his own name. When 
 this is done, the purchaser's title is complete.' 
 
 2. Cop3rright, Any literary, seientitic, or artistic work 
 or composition which may be the subject of copyright, is 
 assignable in law, either before or after copyright is ob- 
 tained ; and the whole right, or any part of it, may be 
 assigned.* Where tlie author has executed the work or 
 
 • Addison on Contracts. 125-126, The Toronto Stock Exchange was 
 incorporated on the 7th of March, 1878. by an Act of the CJnlario Legis- 
 lature. 41 Vic. cap. 65. It adopted the rules then in force as to buying 
 and selling stock, etc. 
 
 ' Copyright Act of 1875. cap. 18. 
 
ABHKtNMENTB — PARTICULAR AHS10NMENT8. 
 
 173 
 
 oompoHitioii for anotlior i)erRon, or has sold tlio same for 
 due consideration, ho cannot obtain or retain tlio proprietor- 
 Hhip of such copyright unleuH by a deed 8|)ecially reserving 
 such privilege to him.' 
 
 The Minister of Agrieulture has power to make rules and 
 regulations and prescribe forms for registering copyright 
 under the Act. These appear by order of the Privy Council, 
 dated 7th December, 1873.' 
 
 The assignment must bo in writing, made in duplicate, 
 and recorded in the office of the Minister of Agriculture at 
 Ottawa. No form of usHignment is prescribed, but the 
 rules say that for proceedings not specially provided, any 
 form being conformable to the letter and spirit of the law, 
 will \)e accepted ; and, if not conformable, will be returned 
 for correction.' 
 
 3. Patents. Every patent for an invention, wheresoever 
 issued, is assignable in law by a written instrument, in man- 
 ner prescribed by the Commissioner of Patents in the 
 Department of Agriculture at Ottawa ; and the exclusive right 
 to make, and use, and to grant to others the right to 
 make and use the invention patented within and through- 
 out Canada, or any part thereof, may be granted and 
 conveyed by a written instrument to be registered in 
 the office of the Commissioner of Patents at Ottawa, 
 according to the regulations in force for the time being. 
 Every assignment affecting a Patent for invention shall 
 be deemed null and void against any subsequent assignee, 
 unless such instrument is registered before the registering 
 of the instrument under which sueli subsequent assignee 
 may claim.* 
 
 The assignment may be absolute, conditional, or defeas- 
 able on the happening of a given event. The assignee does 
 not profess to sell a good and undefcasable right, but merely 
 
 3 
 
 s 
 
 ? 
 
 ' Copyright Act of 1875. cap. 16. 
 
 " See O'Sullivans Manual of Government in Canada, page 03> 
 3 In preparing the assignment, care should be taken to allow, on the 
 back o[ the document, sufficient space for the insertion of the certificate. 
 * Patent Act of 187a, 35 Vic. cap. 26, sec. 22, D. 
 
 
174 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 I 
 
 1 
 
 ^§ 
 
 Buch aa he porhohhcr, ' and he is not liable to pay back the 
 money ho received if the Patent turns out to be invalid, 
 QnlcHB he haH been guilty of fraud.* The right to a Patent 
 is termed by some writers an incorporeal chattel, and in 
 England, as it was granted under the Great Seal enrolled 
 in Chancery, it required a Deed in order to assign it.* 
 
 A deed is necessary in Canada for cither an assignment 
 or the suiTcnder of a Patent. A cop}' of the assignment is 
 sent to the Patent Office, and the original is returned to the 
 person sending it, with the certificate of registration thereon.* 
 The regulations as to assignment of Patents are much the 
 same as in the Copyright Branch of the Department of the 
 Minister of Agriculture. Forms of Assignments and Sur- 
 renders are given, and it is apprehended that these must 
 be followed (see under Forms — Assignments). The regu- 
 lations say that when forms are not specially prescribed, 
 any form conformable to the letter and spirit of the law 
 will be accepted, or if not, will be returned for correction. 
 
 4. Trade Marks and Designs. Every registered 
 trade mark is assignable in law by a written instrument, 
 which must be produced at the office of the Minister of 
 Agriculture, where the assignee's name, etc., are entered 
 in the margin of the Register of Trade Marks." 
 
 Every Design, either as to the whole interest or as to any 
 undivided part thereof, is assigned in the same office as a 
 Trade Mark, and with similar formalities. 
 
 The same Act makes provision for the assignment of 
 Industrial Designs,* either as to the whole interest, or any 
 undivided part thereof, by a written instrument recorded as 
 in the case of Trade Marks ; and every proprietor of a 
 
 • Hall V. Cotider, 26 L. J. C. P. 138. 
 ' Lawes v. Purser, 26 L, J. Q. B. 25. 
 s Lincoln's College Case, 3 Coke, 63 a. 
 
 4 The copy must be neatly written on foolscap paper (8 by 13 inches), 
 with an inner margin of one mch and a half wide, and all papers addressed 
 to '• The Commissioner of Patents, Ottawa." (See general rules of Patent 
 Office. September, 1872.) 
 
 s 42 Vic. cap. 22, sec. 14. 
 
 ' Ibid, sec. 25. 
 
AH8IONMENT8 — PARTICULAR A8BI0NMENTS. 
 
 175 
 
 Design may grant and convey an oxcluBivo riglit, under any 
 copyright, to make, use, and vend, and to grant to others 
 the right to make, use, and vend 8ueh design within and 
 throughout Canada, or any part thereof, for tlie unexpired 
 term of its duration, or any part thereof ; which exchiHive 
 grant and conveyance shall be called a licenHc, and shall 
 he recorded in the same manner and within the same delay 
 as assignments. 
 
 By an Act passed in 1870,' every Timber Mark registered 
 in the office of the Minister of Agriculture shall be assign- 
 able in law. The manner of assignment is similar to tiiat 
 prescribed for Trade Marks. 
 
 5. Policies of Insurance. Fire and Marine policies 
 are as a rule not assignable before loss without the consent of 
 the Company. The restrictive conditions as to assigning 
 do not apply after a total loss, and the money payable in 
 respect of a partial loss may be assigned.* 
 
 A Life Policy is a choxc in action, such as other Policies 
 of Insurance, but the benefits under it can be assigned 
 without the consent of the Company. 
 
 ':);S> 
 
 IM 
 
 ' 33 Vic. cap. 3O, D. 
 
 ' Kerr V. Hastings Mutual I nsnrance Coy , 41 U. C. R. 220. 
 
CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 PERSONAL PKOPEUTY. 
 
 I. Tkcmminakv. 
 II. Divisions op Fkrsonai. I'ro- 
 
 PERTV. 
 
 III. Gifts OK HersonalPropkrty, 
 
 IV. Sales of Fkrsonal Property 
 
 AT Common Law. 
 
 V. t^ALKSOF Pk.RSONAI. PROPERTY 
 
 i^NUBK THE Statutes of 
 Frauds : 
 
 1. The Note or Memorandum. 
 
 2. Goods, etc., u'itliiii the 
 
 Statute. 
 
 VI. Salfs ani> Mortoa«;h.s un- 
 »KK H. S. O.. Cap. 119: 
 
 I. Scope and Object of this 
 Statute. 
 
 2. Bona Hdes. 
 
 3. Good Consideration. 
 
 4. Ooods and Chattels within 
 
 this Act. 
 
 VII. Conveyances under the 
 Revised Statute : 
 
 1 . Poiftt: ■/ cumilarity in Con- 
 
 veyancts of Sales and 
 Mortgages. 
 
 2. Points of Disagreement. 
 
 3. Form of Conveyances under 
 
 the Statute. 
 
 4. Rights of the Parties there- 
 
 under. 
 
 VIII. Salf.s and Mortgages ok 
 Vessels. 
 
 IX, Leases of Chattels. 
 
 1. PRELIMINARY. 
 
 Personal property, like real estate, may be sold, mort- 
 gaged, leased, or rights respecting it assigned. Unlike real 
 estate, no subsequent conveyance is necessary to complete 
 the purchaser's title ; indeed, the term conveyance is not 
 properly applicable to it. Conveyance, as defined in our 
 statutes, refers solely to land ' ; and without such definition 
 it has been held to relate properly to real, and not to per- 
 sonal property.' It has also been held that a conveyance 
 
 ' See Introductory Chapter. 
 
 * Dickerman v. Abrahams, 21 Barb. 561. 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — DI VIRIONS OP PERSONAL PROPERTY. 177 
 
 imports an inRtrumont under Real.' To this may be added 
 the testimony of almost any ' dictionary. The correct 
 text-writers in England do not sptak of the "conveyance,* " 
 but the " alienation " of pergonal property. 
 
 Personal property, being generally capable of transfer or 
 delivery, the title to it — the property, as it is called — almost 
 always goes along with jumesHwn ; and this fact is what 
 chiefly distiugiiisbes the transfer of personal property, 
 ospecially what is known as goods and chattels. Where 
 delivery is capable, the law, as a rule, requires such de- 
 livery to be made, or the transaction evidenced by a writing, 
 or tliat Rome valuable consideration pasR between the 
 parties ; if there is no delivery and no consideration, then 
 the law requires the solemnity of a deed for the oiTeetunl 
 transfer of personal property. 
 
 The writer will endeavour to condense in this chapter the 
 most important things to be known in regard to the transfer 
 of personal property, tracing it fiuia the common law down 
 to the present. What is commonly known an chattel mort- 
 gages and bills of Hale of chattels refer to our llevised 
 Statute, cap. 119 ; but it will be more satisfactory if saU-s 
 and mortgages are traced before this statute. In order to 
 preserve the symmetry of plan, a few remarks will be made 
 on Leases of Chattels — Assignments have been includid in 
 the previous chapter. 
 
 mort- 
 e real 
 iplete 
 8 not 
 our 
 ition 
 per- 
 yance 
 
 II. DIVISIONS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY. 
 
 In the foregoing chapters, we have considered the differ- 
 ent dispositions made of rial estate, such as agreeuionts, 
 sales, mortgages, etc. In regard to leases, it may be suid 
 that although leasehold property is personal property — 
 chattels real — it is generally classed in conveyancing with 
 real property. Some of the matters treated in the chapter 
 on Assignments, though pertaining to realty, are what is 
 
 ' Livermore v. Bagley ^ Mass. 487. and i Bac. Abr. title ••Bill of Sale." 
 
 • The word conveyance includes a will in contemplation of law. See 
 Doe d. Baker v. Clark, 7 Q. B. 44. 
 
 o'u.c. 12 
 
 2i 
 
178 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 ? 
 
 * 
 
 called personalty b« voring of the realty ; the others treated 
 therein are incorporeal rights or incorporeal chattels. The 
 intention of tlie writer was to keep the two divisions of ie%\ 
 and personal projjerty as distinct as it was possihle to do 
 so. Any one, however, at all conversant with the nature of 
 property in general, will see the difficulty of carrying this 
 out completely. 
 
 It will he seen that, between land and real estate on the 
 one hand, and goods and chattels or personal property on 
 the other, there is a great variety of interests which are 
 partly of one kind and partly of another. Before entering 
 into the consideration of personal property, it will be desirable 
 to know and understand the precise ground, if possible, it 
 takes up in the province of property generally. Personal 
 property is becoming every day more and more important, 
 and several new species of it have sprung up since the early 
 writers in our law sketched out its then boundaries. 
 
 The ancient divisions of property were (1) lands and tene- 
 ments, termed inimovahlea, and (2) goods and chattels, or 
 movables. The simple manners of men in primitive society 
 knew and required no technical classifications ; but a dif- 
 ference was apparent to everyone in the land which he 
 tilled, and in the implements, for example, by which he 
 tilled it. Land was also called a tenement, as it was held 
 under some owner ; but goods and chattels were not held of 
 any person, and never were the subject of an estate, as was 
 the case with lands. In process of time, lands were viewed 
 with reference to the heirs of the owner, and so the term 
 hereditament was added. Lands, tenements, and heredita- 
 ments were therefore the terms applied to that species of 
 property; and goods and chattels embraced all other 
 property. 
 
 Along with the use of these terms, the distinction of eor- 
 })oreal and incorporeal property obtained, and these were 
 applied to movable as well as to immovable property. 
 Goods, wares and merchandises comprehended all corporeal 
 movable property ; while rents, annuities, choses in action, 
 documents of title, interests in copyright, etc., were classed 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — DIVISIONS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY. 179 
 
 »f cor- 
 
 were 
 
 ertv. 
 
 oreal 
 
 ction, 
 
 assed 
 
 under incorporeal rights of property — some of them incor- 
 poreal liereditanients, and others incorporeal chattels. 
 
 It will be perceived that these divisions were the result 
 of a more artificial state of society than the simple ones 
 that were in use at an earlier period ; the necessity of the 
 times gave rise to another division, arising out of the 
 remedies which the courts gave for the recovery of property, 
 or in regard to it, and originated a more general appella- 
 tion, now in universal use. It arose in this way : — 
 
 Actions formerly were divided into real, personal, and 
 mixed ; and as the first of these concerned lands, tene- 
 ments, and hereditaments, in course of time these acquired 
 the name of trul property — rmltij. Real property or land is 
 <lefined as any ground, soil, or earth whatsoever, and 
 includes all buildings standing or built on it, and trees, 
 fixtures and fences upon it. The term real estate is co- 
 extensive with lands, tenements and hereditaments, and 
 embraces all interests in real property, except terms for 
 years and other chattel interests in land.' 
 
 The actions relating to goods and chattels and rights 
 concerning them were, for a like reason, termed personal 
 actions, and the subject-matter of such actions came to be 
 called personal property — personalty,^ 
 
 The main distinction between real and personal property, 
 as we term them, has been already mentioned — that of 
 tenure. Real property is held by estates — there is no ab- 
 solute or independent ownership in it. The Crown alone is 
 the absolute owner. The rule is exactly the reverse in 
 personal property. It cannot be held for an estate, 
 and at law the ownership is absolute. There is no such 
 thing, properly, as an estate in personal property — nor per- 
 sonal estate in the technical sense in which one speaks of 
 real estate. There is what is called property in a chattel, 
 
 ' See re Parsons, .\ Ont. App. 379, as to "real estate, " and The Toronto 
 Strtet kailuay Company v. Fleming, 36 Q. B. 116, as to "lands." 
 
 ' Personal property is that which may attend the owner's person, where- 
 soever he thinks proper to go. 2 Black, Comm. 16, 834 ; 3 ditto, 144. But 
 goods and chattels were not usually called personal property till they 
 have become too numerous and important to attend the persons of their 
 owners. Wms. Real Property, 7. 
 
 
 
180 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 
 and as the property may be separate from the possession, 
 this becomes frequently a very material point to consider. 
 The right of property may not only be by the possession 
 and property in a chattel, but may be in regard to any con- 
 tract respecting a chattel or otherwise. This has necessi- 
 tated two divisions of personal property. 
 
 1. CJioges in possession. 
 
 2. Choses in action. 
 
 In the former of these is to be classed all movable goods, 
 tangible in their nature, and which are to be found in the 
 possession of some one. They are corporeal, sensible 
 tl'iingK, goods and chattels, fixtures, title deeds, heir-looms, 
 etc., etc. The latter class has been referred to heretofore. 
 Mr. Williams, in his work on Personal Property, adds a 
 third class — incorporeal personal property, such as personal 
 annuities, stocks and shares, patents and copyrights. 
 (See Chapter on Assignments.) The present chapter is con- 
 fined to choses in possession. 
 
 Personal property is also divided into two great classes, 
 chattels real and chattels personal. Of the former, all estates 
 in land which are less than a freehold ; chattels personal 
 include movable things only, choses in possession and 
 ihoses in action.' 
 
 By emhlevients is meant crops growing upon land — the 
 yearly growth. 
 
 Fixtures are chattels or things of a personal nature 
 which have been affixed to the land ; they must be perma- 
 nently and habitually attached to it, or must be component 
 parts of some structure or erection, or machine attached to 
 the freehold, without which the erection, structure, or ma- 
 chine would be imperfect and incomplete. A fixture cannot 
 exist without actual annexatitm to the freehold, and it is 
 necessary that the party annexing the thing owns both the 
 thing iiud the soil to which it is attached. The party mak- 
 ing the annexation must also intend to make it a permanent 
 accession to the freehold. 
 
 ' Mr. Herman uses this classification in his valuable work en Chattel 
 Mortgages. 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — OIFTS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY. 181 
 
 There may, however, he movable fixtures, as where a 
 tenant has the right to remove and carry away all such 
 fixtures of a chattel nature as he himself has erected upon 
 the premises occupied by him as such tenant, for the pur- 
 pose of ornament, domestic convenience, or to carry on 
 trade, provided they can be removed without material in- 
 jury to the land. These are personal property of the tenant, 
 nnd unless exempt they can be sold as goods and chattels 
 under an execution.* 
 
 Diial 
 and 
 
 -the 
 
 III. GIFTS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY. 
 
 A gift of choses in possession may be made complete by 
 delivery ; but, if there is no delivery, a deed is necessary. 
 A parol gift does not pass the property to the donee unless 
 there be actual delivery with it,* but an effectual gift may 
 be made of a chattel already in the actual possession of the 
 donee without any renewed act of delivery,* though this has 
 been doubted.* In Rupert v. Johnston* in our own court, 
 the late Chief Justice Harrison said : " The better rule 
 now appears that a gift of a chattel inter rivos may be 
 good without actual delivery, but is revocable, until the 
 donee has made some statement, or done some act testify- 
 ing his acquiescence in the gift." 
 
 The donor must part not only witli the possession, but 
 with the dominion of the property ; and, when the gift is 
 perfect by delivery and acceptance, it is then irrevocable by 
 the donor.* Gifts inter tints, when made perfect by delivery 
 of the things given, are executed contracts'; and a gift ia 
 
 ' Herman on Chattel Mortgages, 5. 6, 7. 
 
 • Queen v. Carter, 13 U. C. C. P. 611. 
 
 3 Champney v. Blanchard, 39 N. Y. in ; Shower v. Pilch, 4 Ex. 478. 
 
 * Mr. Lewis, in his Principles of Conveyancing, 146. says: — "If the 
 goods are already in the possession of the dunee, a mere parol gift is void, 
 and a deed is necessary;" and he cites Shower v. Pilch, supra. Mr. 
 Benjamin takes the opposite view, and so do the American authorities. 
 
 5 40 U. C. R. II. 
 
 ' Viet V. Viet, 34, U. C. R. 104. 
 
 ? Per Wild, J., in Graver v. Grover, 24 Pick. 264. 
 
 .0 
 
 M 
 
182 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 fitrictly a contract/ If the donor has not possession of the 
 chattel, or if it is in the hands of a bailee, or where the* de- 
 livery is not easy or impossible, in these cases a declaration 
 of trust was held j^ood in equity." 
 
 As to voluntary gifts and settlements of personal proi)erty, 
 including promissory notes and other ehoses in action, see 
 liichardson y. liirhanlson, L. W. 3 Ex. (580; K'-'kcwirl: v. 
 Manninff, 1 De G. M. .V G. 170. 
 
 As to gifts of money by ehe(pie, see Bromhji v. liniuton, 
 L. R. 6 Eq. 275, and Jouen v. Lock, L. K. 1 Cliy. App. 'I'y. 
 
 As to gifts caum mortis in trust, see Slwedyv. Uonch, \'1\ 
 Mass. 472. 
 
 The gift mav be effectually transferred to the donee bv a 
 deed poll and any form of words signifying an intention t<> 
 transfer will be sulhcient in the operative part. It is 
 recommended to recite that a gift is intended, so that there 
 may be no itnplied resulting trust ; but it is not necessary 
 to state that it is dcmc! for natural love, affection, etc. No 
 words of limitation of estate are necessary ; in law thive is 
 no estate in a chattel personal, though it was held that thi rt 
 may be such estates in equity. A grant or assignment 
 passes the whole interest, unless the contrary is expressed. 
 If the donor has any property to transfer, the deed transfers 
 it ; but, so far as his right to transfer it does not at pres:^at 
 <xtend, the whole is executory, and the right of the don.-c 
 lies only in contract by damages to be sought for under the 
 covenants. 
 
 It is not usual to ask for covenants^ to title in a gift, un- 
 less the donee wishes to secure himself in the enjoyment of, 
 it, as where a father gives an advancement to his son by 
 way of gift. Although tlu^ gift pass nothing, still the donee 
 may recover under the covenants ; and so it is suggestid 
 
 ■ Per Hoar, J., in Tht Atty.-Gen'l v. The Merrimnc Mnini/itctiiring Co.. 
 14 Gray, 617. 
 
 » I^wis Principles of Conveyancing, 146. 
 
 ' In the case of personalty, the covenants do not run to the assignee 
 unless expressly mentioned ; but, if proper authority is ^iven in the assifjn- 
 nient, the assignee could sue in the covenantor s name. See Lewis' Prin- 
 ciples of Conveyancing, 14(1, and svq. 
 
II!' Cv.. 
 
 issi''nce 
 
 PERSONAL PROPERTY — SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY. 183 
 
 to have a covenant for further assurance, for right to con- 
 vey or assign, and for quiet enjoyment, as these at law even 
 give a remedy on a gift. 
 
 There should bo a power in the deed to enter and take 
 the goods, as this power is not implied ' ; and where they 
 come into the hands of other persons, as the donor's exeeu- 
 tors, this may be of impoi*tance. 
 
 The goods, if numerous, should be sot out in a schedule, 
 unless there are deeds or other evidences of title rclatin;^ to 
 the right to the goods, and such deeds themselves must ho 
 mentioned if they are to pass in the gift." 
 
 No hahcndnm is ever necessary, as there can be no 
 tenure, no estates limited, no uses declared, nor any trust 
 to be performed in the case of a gift of chattels. The con- 
 ditions can only refer to contingencies before tlie property 
 vests ; and, except these, there can be no proviso or con- 
 dition at law affecting personal chattels.' 
 
 IV. SALES or PERSONAL PROPERTY AT COMMON 
 
 LAW. 
 
 At Common Law a sale of personal property is usually 
 termed a bargain and sale of goods.* This is defined to be 
 a present transfer of the absolute or general property in a 
 thing for a price in money. Besides such essential ele- 
 ments as are necessary to every contract, referred to be- 
 fore, there is hi a contract for the sale of personal property 
 some particulars proper to be observed. That there shonid 
 be parties competent to contract and a mutual assent, is 
 something to be expected in all contracts or agreements ; 
 but in regard to personal pro))erty tliorc must be a transfer 
 of the absolute or general property in the tiling sold, and a 
 
 ' Williams v. Munis, 8 M. & W. 488, 
 
 » Lewis' Trinciples of Conveyancing, 146, 162. 
 
 3 The precedent given among the Forms and Preceilents, post, is taken 
 from Lewis' I'rinciples of Conveyancing, and seems to have been carefully 
 prepared. 
 
 * Benjamin on Sales, page i, Makaness v. Long, 85 Penn St, 158. 
 
 W 
 
 CO 
 
 i 
 
 » 
 
184 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVBTANOINO. 
 
 t 
 
 iC5 
 
 price in money either paid or promised. If any of these 
 ingredients be wanting there is no sale.' 
 
 Unless the fjeneral or absolute property passes there ia 
 no sale. A special property may, however, be transferred 
 as a pawn or pledge, which docs not constitute a sale.* 
 
 No other but a money consideration, either in cash or 
 credit, will constitute a sale ; if the goods are given in 
 exchange for other goods, it is an exchange or barter.* 
 Where no consideration is given it is not a sale but a gift ; 
 and where a person receives a chattel to keep for a certain 
 time and to become owner of it then if he has paid the 
 stipulated price, but if otherwise to pay for its use, this is 
 not a sale but a bailment ;* and, lastly, where by the terms 
 of a contract one party is to take goods of another and re- 
 turn monthly the amount of sales at the prices charged by 
 the latter, who will furnish the former with all goods in 
 his line, this is not a sale of goods but a consignment of 
 them. 
 
 At common law no writing whatever was necessary to 
 effect a bargain and sale of goods ; the property imme- 
 diately passed to the buyer on the mutual assent of the 
 parties to the contract. If the property in the goods was 
 not immediately to pass to the buyer, but was subject to 
 certain conditions, the transaction was not termed a con- 
 tract, but an executory agreement. 
 
 A sale, as was said, contemplates a present transfer ; 
 where, therefore, the thing has ceased to exist, the sale is void, 
 as the assent of the parties was founded on a mutual mis- 
 take of fact, there being no subject-matter for a contract, 
 and the contract was, therefore, never completed.' But a 
 thing not yet in existence, but which may exist, can be the 
 subject of a sale or an agreement to sell, such as a crop of 
 
 • Holliday v. Holgaie, L. R. 3 Ex. 299. 
 - See cases in Benjamin on Sales, 3. 
 
 3 See South Australian Ins. Co. v. Randcll. L. R. 3 P. C. C. loi. 
 
 * Gooderham v. Marlatt. 14 U. C K. 22A: Dodds v. Diirand, 5 U. C R 
 623. See Moore v. Sibbald. 29 U. C. R. 487, as to sale with right to 
 repurchase. 
 
 5 Farrar v. Nightingale, 2 Esp. 139. 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — SALES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY. 185 
 
 Lay to be grown on a man's field, etc. A man, however, 
 cannot sell personal property in which he has no interest or 
 a mere possibility coupled with no interest ; be can sell 
 whatever he has a present interest in'; and he can agree 
 to sell his interest in chattels as soon as they are acquired — 
 equity compelling him to carry out his contract as soon as 
 hu is in a position to do so. 
 
 Where the price is fixed it is of course part of the con- 
 tract : but if not so, then it may be determined by other 
 means, such as by arbitration, valuation, etc. If nothing 
 is said as to the price the law will imply a reasonable value 
 for it — generally the market price at the time and place of 
 the delivery. 
 
 On a sale of goods there is no implied warranty of a title 
 to them, unless by the particular custom of a trade, or 
 where the goods are sold in a shop professing to deal in 
 Huch things. But the sale of goods for a particular pur- 
 pose, or with the knowledge that they are to be applied to 
 such purpose, implies a warranty for their fitness for it. 
 
 The rule requiring the vendor to be the owner has some 
 exceptions ; a sale made in market overt is good, though 
 the vendor had no title ; but it would be difficult to say if 
 th(ie is any such thing as market overt in this Province, in 
 the sense in which it is used in England. In the case of 
 Crane v. London Dock Cumpanyi^ the late Chief Justice 
 Cockburn expressed an opinion that a sale could not be 
 considered as made in market overt, " unless the goods 
 were exposed in the market for sale, and the whole trans- 
 action begun, continued and completed in the open market, 
 so as to give the fullest opportunity to the man whoso 
 goods have been taken to make pursuit of • them and to 
 prevent their being sold." 
 
 Any knowledge to the purchaser of his vendor's want of 
 title will be fatal to his own, even if the purchase were 
 made in market overt. 
 
 00 
 
 1^ 
 
 Benjamin on Sales, 8j. 
 5 B. & S. 313. 
 
166 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 Persons entrusted with the possession of goods or the 
 documents which arc the indicia of tlie property therein may, 
 if the nature of their cmpluyineut points to the possession 
 of such goods, he primd facie entitled to sell. 
 
 On a sale of chattels there should he a covenant or a 
 warranty as to title expressly given as in a sale of lands. 
 It seems that the word *' property" used by the seller or 
 donor in any transfer of i)er8onal property, implies title 
 thereto ; and any verl)al declaration that the vendor is en> 
 titled, made at or Ixifore the sale, is a warranty. In other 
 respects the maxim caveat emptor generally applies. 
 
 i 
 
 I 
 
 V. SALES UNDEll THE STATl TE OF FRAUDS. 
 
 Thus stands the sale of goods at Common Law. The 
 Statute of Frauds,' however, matoriiilly altered this as to 
 the uuthentieatiun of the contract. Under it no sale of 
 goods, wjires, or merchandises of the value of .£10 sterling* 
 or upwards sluill he allowed to he good, except — 
 
 (1) The buyer shall accept part of the goods so sold and 
 actually receive the same ; 
 
 (2) Or give something in earnest to bind the bargain, or 
 in part i)ayment ; 
 
 (3) Or that some note or memorandum in writing of the 
 said bargain be made and signed by the parties to be charged 
 with such contract, or their agents thereunto lawfully au- 
 thorized. 
 
 A subsequent Statute, Lord Tenterden's Act,* extended 
 this section of the Statute of Frauds to executory contracts, 
 and now both statutes are read together.* 
 
 The points material in our present enquiry relate only to 
 the sulhciency of the note or memorandum in writing, and 
 also as to what are goods, wares, and merchandises within 
 the Statute. As to the iirst of these, the note must contain 
 
 ■ 2cj Car. II., Clip. 3, sec. 17. 
 
 " In Ontario, ot the value of 940 or upwards; K. S. O. cap. 117, sec. 11. 
 
 s y (leo. IV., cap. 14, sec. 7. 
 
 * Scutt V. Eustcrn Counties Riiilu'tiy Cuiupanv, i J M. cS: W. 33 ; Harman v. 
 Rent, iS C. H. 5S7. 
 
man v. 
 
 PERSOMAIi rnOPERTY — 8ALE8 UNDKR STATUTE OF FRAUDS. 187 
 
 tiie names or descriptions of the parties, and the description 
 may suthce forthe name ; the raeniorandum must show, not 
 only who is the person to be charged, hut also the party in 
 whose favour he is charged. 
 
 The note or writiuR must ho a raeniorandum of " the hnr- 
 gain," and it must contain the whole hargain between the 
 parties, and so must contain the price, when that is agreed 
 i:pw. The other terms of the contract must bo so ex- 
 pressed as to be intelligible. 
 
 The memorandum may he on several pieces of paper, or 
 may be written at different times ; but they must be con- 
 sistent, and must refer to each other without the necessity 
 of introducing parol evidence, and it is no objection that it 
 is written in pencil. 
 
 The other question to be decided is, what are goods, 
 Wiires, and merchandises within the statute ? 
 
 It does not apply to shares, stocks, documents of title, 
 choses in action, and other incorporeal rights in property. It 
 may be expected also, that any interest in land under the 
 4th section of the Statute of Frauds is not within the 17th 
 section. Where the growing crop is to bo severed before 
 the property passes, it would generally seem to bo goods 
 and chattels ; where the property passes before severance, 
 if fructuH iudnstriales, the 17th section applies ; if fructua 
 mttiiralcs, the 4th section applies. Whether frnctua indus- 
 triales, while growing, are still goods, wares and merchan- 
 dises, does not appear to have been decided. Where the 
 land is agreed to be sold, the vendee takes from the vendor 
 the growing crops the latter being considered part of the 
 land. 
 
 A chattel intended as a lixture to the freehold is not with- 
 in the 17th section of the statute. 
 
 A contract for the sale of growing timber is, as a general 
 rule, a contract for the sale of an interest in land.' 
 
 This is a very hurried rceium' of what are the main deci- 
 sions on this important statute, so far as we are concerned. 
 
 ' See recent case oi Summtrs v. Cook, >\i Chy. 179. 
 
 S3 
 
 S3 
 
 i 
 
 •■O 
 
 s 
 
188 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVRYANCINO. 
 
 The exhaustive hook of Mr. Benjamin on Sales, especially 
 the last edition, of 1881, will supply a number of authorities 
 on almost every point. A good feature of this edition is 
 the reference to cases in our Canadian Courts. 
 
 VI. SALES AND MORTGAGES OF GOODS 
 CHATTELS UNDER R. S. 0., CAP. 119. 
 
 AND 
 
 1. Object of this Statute. We have Hcen that at 
 common law no writing was necessary for a sale of goods 
 and chattels ; nor is it necessary that a mortgage of 
 chattels should be in writing. An unwritten mortgage is 
 valid between the parties, the same as an absolute sale of 
 chattels.' It will be desirable, under the Revised Statute, 
 to consider sales and mortgages at the same time. 
 
 A sale of chattels transfers the title and tlie possession — 
 a mortgage of chattels transfers also the whole legal interest 
 and the possession, but subject to be defeated by the per- 
 formance of a condition. A chattel mortgage is more than 
 a mere security ; it is a conditional sale of the thing mort- 
 gaged, and operates to transfer the title to the mortgagee, 
 to be defeated only by the full performance of the condi- 
 tions. It is more than a lien or security for the debt ; it is 
 an absolute pledge to become an absolute interest if not 
 redeemed in a certain time. It is neither a sale, nor a 
 pledge, though it partakes of the nature of both. A pledge 
 or pawn only gives a special property in the goods, allow- 
 ing the pawnee to detain them for security — the general 
 property remains in the pawnor. 
 
 As between a sale and a mortgage, it may be stated gener- 
 ally, that, whenever the conveyance is intended as a security 
 for money lent, it will be held to be a mortgage; and if this is 
 a matter of doubt, it will also generally be construed to be 
 a mortgage.' 
 
 • And actual delivery is not necessary ; constructive delivery will be 
 sufficient in a mortgage. Myerstein v. Barber, 2 L. R. C. P. 52. Coote on 
 Mortgages. 426. 
 
 * Mr. Herman, Chattel Mortgage, page 68, says, that any condition in a 
 lease, giving the lessor a lien upon the tenant's property as security for 
 the rent, is a chattel mortgage ; and also that a lease, providing that the 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — SALES AMP MORTOAOEB, ETC. 189 
 
 The condition or cicfcasanco in a deed, defeating the con- 
 Yeyance, need not necessarily be in the same instrument, 
 tut it must be part of tbo same transaction ; and an instru- 
 ment absohite, on the face of it, may be shewn aliunde to be 
 a mortgage. 
 
 An equity to redeem must be reserved, either in the form 
 of a condition, avoiding the transfer upon payment at the 
 appointed time, or in the form of a re-assignment.' 
 
 In regard, therefore, to absohite and conditional sales, 
 the common law requirements were remarkably simple, and 
 it is only in regard to absolute sales that any statutory 
 regulations were made. These were the Statute of Frauds, 
 and Lord Tenterden's Act, already referred to ; and they are 
 the only ones, so far as the immediate parties to the transac- 
 tion are concerned. 
 
 There are no statutory regulations aflFecting the immediate 
 parties to chattel mortgages.' 
 
 The Revised Statute of Ontario, cap. 119, is now to be 
 considered in view of this state of the law. This statute 
 docs not impose any new formalities in regard to the sale or 
 mortgage of goods and chattels, so far as the immediate parties 
 are concerned. The law in that respect is precisely what it 
 was before our Provincial Statutes, or what is now our Revised 
 Statute, cap. IIP, came in force. This statute says in 
 effect, to the purcliaser or mortgagee, if you wish to protect 
 yourself against the creditors, or against any subsequent 
 pm-chaser or mortgjigee in good faith of your vendor or 
 mortgagor, as the case may be, there are certain additional 
 formalities to be observed before your title is unimpeach- 
 able from any quarter. These formalities are set out in the 
 Revised Statute ; but if the purcliaser or mortgagee has no 
 concern in regard to the creditors, or subsequent pur- 
 
 C 
 o 
 
 in a 
 for 
 the 
 
 lessor is to have full title, with the privilege of taking full possession, at any 
 and all times, of any and all the products of the farm in payment of the 
 balance due on rent, is a chattel mortgage, and invalid if not recorded as 
 required by law. (Johnson v. Crofoot, 53 Barb. 574) 
 
 • Coote on Mortgages, 430. 
 
 » In sales under the Revised Statute, under the value of /lo sterling, a 
 written conveyance is necessary, though not necessary at common law, nor 
 under the Statute of Frauds. See injfni as to Ships. 
 
100 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVKYANCINO. 
 
 ? 
 
 
 chtisorH, or mortgugeuH of the porson with whom hu Ih deal- 
 ing, then ho in not called upon to conHidoi* any ivquiromontrt 
 of tliia Htatutc. Hut if so, there are two altornativcH heforo 
 him ; either the goodH and chattcli) nniHt he doliveroil up 
 immediately, and there munt he an actual an<l continuouH 
 retention of them in the posseHHioii of the new owner or 
 mortgagee, and out of ti»o possession of the former owner ; 
 or, there must he a coucai/ance madi; of the goods and chat- 
 tels, as prescrihed hy the statute. It is with the hitter 
 alternative only that wi; have to deal, as in the former case 
 no writing was required, either at common law or under 
 the Statute of Frauds. If the vendor or mortgagor can 
 sell the goods and chattels at all, the sale or mortgage is 
 unimpeachahle where the possession of them passes 
 immediately, actually, and continuously out of the one party 
 and into the other, and no writing or conveyance Ih 
 necessary. 
 
 " The object and intent of the act were the benefit and pro- 
 tection of creditors, and to prevent their being defrauded by 
 persons remaining in the actual possession of goods and 
 chattels, and keeping up the appearance of being I'le owners 
 of them, after having disposed of them by bill of sale, either 
 absolutely or by way of mortgage, by requiring, in effect, 
 that when such disposal takes place, and is not accom- 
 panied by an immediate delivery, and an actual and con- 
 tinued change of possession, the true transaction, effecting 
 such disposal, shall be put in writing, and registered, with 
 affidavits, verifying the truth of the transaction.' " 
 
 2. Bona Fides. Where a convej'ance, as the statute 
 calls it, intended to operate, either as a sale or mortgage, 
 is necessary, the first essential requisite is that the trans- 
 action be bona fide ; in other words, that the retention of 
 the goods in the owner's possession, after he lias made an 
 assignment of them, be not fraudulent. As is well known, 
 the possession of goods so assigned raised a presumption 
 that the transaction is fraudulent. The requirements which 
 
 • Per Mr. Justice Armour, in Hamilton v. Harrison, 46 Q. B. p. 135. 
 
PEnsoNAii I'norKniY — halks and moiitoaoks, ktc. 191 
 
 ibis Htatuto (IciiiantlH arc iiiiended to rt^lxit thai preHUinp- 
 tion, and evidmict' is acccpttul, ho far ais tin- tonvryanco in 
 cojicornt'd, by tbe alVnbivit of tbe purcliaHcr or mortgageo, 
 otborwiBo i\w transaction would be primu I'mif bad.' Tbe 
 statute sbifts tbe presumption on a HulVKueut allidavit 
 accompanying' tbe conveyance, ho as to f,'ive jircHuniptively 
 tbe le^al title in tbe purebaser or ni )rt<{a<;ee. 
 
 Wbetber a mortKa^e be fraiKbUent or not, as aj^ainHt 
 creditors or subsecpient mort^n^'ees, in a matter of fact 
 lying cbietly witliin tbe knowledge of tbe cbent. and not 
 ordinarily sometbing wbicb n solicitor can bo called on to 
 advise. He may be asked if tbe circumstances, as stated, 
 disclose a fraud ; if so, tbe conveyance cannot be carried 
 out. 
 
 Generally speaking;, all transactions made to binder, de- 
 feat, and delay creditors, or defraud tbem, or defraud 
 subsequent purcbasers, are void under the statutes of 
 Elizabeth ; and a voluntary mortgage, not communicated to 
 creditors, and kept to be used, if convenient, is fraudulent 
 thereunder.* 
 
 The transfer of a debtor's entire property to one creditor 
 can scarcely be upheld as against t!ie others ; but a creditor 
 who comes to the assistance of a debtor with a sum of 
 money, by way of substantial advance, will be protected to 
 the extent of such advance, if it be done to enable tbe debtor 
 to carry on his business and pay bis other creditors.* 
 
 If there is a judgment against tbe debtor, and a writ of 
 execution in the hands of tbe shcrifJ", tbe execution binds 
 the goods and chattels from the time of delivery to the 
 sheriff ; and an intending purchaser or mortgagee should 
 satisfy himself on this point, otherwise tbe execution 
 creditor can disregard tbe conveyance made by the debtor. 
 But a judgment of itself does not bind the goods and chat- 
 
 23 
 
 CO 
 
 C 
 o 
 
 
 s? 
 
 ' The result of the cases is, that possession of (;oodsand chattels after an 
 assignment of them, does not of itself constitute fraud, as against creditors, 
 but is only prima facie evidence of it, capable, like any other evidence of 
 a similar kind, of being rebutted or explained Coote on Mortgages. 430. 
 
 » Cracknall v. yansen. 11 Chy. D i C. A. 
 
 3 See Robins v. Clark, 45 Q. B. 362. 
 
192 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 fi C=: 
 
 tels ; and a valid mortgage, or a bill of sale of them, may 
 be made betwoon the signing of the judgment and the 
 placing of the writ in the sheriff's hands. It would be 
 difficult, however, to conceive of a case in practice where 
 this is possible, if the intending purchaser or mortgagee was 
 made aware of the judgment. His oath would be pledged 
 that the transaction was not effected by him to defraud this 
 particular judgment creditor. It is true, that a creditor 
 with a judgment may not eventually turn out to be an 
 execution creditor. Judgments in the lower courts are every 
 day set aside ; and execution may never issue in favour of 
 a judgment creditor in one of them ; indeed, it may issue 
 against him after the decision in the last court of resort. 
 The law has wisely made a distinction between a judgment 
 and an execution; but where there is a judgment in a final 
 court, there would seem to be no possibility for an intend- 
 ing purchaser or mortgagee, who was aware of it, of making 
 an affidavit of bona Jidcs. Huch judgment creditor should 
 be a creditor so far as the conscience of the party making 
 tlie affidavit is concerned. 
 
 A judgment, followed by an execution, in the hands of a 
 bailiff, in the Division Court, does not bind the goods and 
 chattels it appears, till actual seizure is made ; though the 
 Jaw should be otherwise in those cases where there is no 
 appeal. 
 
 Property in the custody of the law, as under an attach- 
 ment or an execution, may bo sold or mortgaged ; and all the 
 interest of the debtor,after the execution creditor is satisfied, 
 will pass to the purchaser or mortgagee. 
 
 A tenant cannot make a bill of sale or chattel mortgage 
 on goods liable to distress for rent, so as to cut out the 
 landlord's prior right; and the landlord can follow the 
 goods for thirt}-^ days, if they are removed fraudulently or 
 clandestinely, no matter whether the purchaser can make 
 the necessary affidavit or not. 
 
 3. Consideration. T'le bona Jides of the transaction 
 is, therefore, a prerequisite to the affidavit, and there can 
 be no bona Jides without a valuable consideration. There 
 
II 
 
 gage 
 the 
 the 
 y or 
 nake 
 
 PEUSOXAL rROPKRTY — SALES AND AIORTGAGKS, KTC. 103 
 
 mavbe vahiahlo consideration without Jidiki lidcs, hut this 
 will not ])Q sul'licifnt to support a convi'vanco ujidcr the Re- 
 vised Statute. In the same way hoioi j'uJi s of itself, if it 
 could 1)0 conceived withonc a valuable consideration, is in- 
 sutticiont. The two must concur in order to an efl'ectual 
 convevance. 
 
 What is a sufficient consideration has been referred to 
 herein before. A valuable consideration may bo marriage, 
 money, or money's worth, present or contingent indebted- 
 ness, or liability, as for future advancements or endorsa- 
 tions, etc. But a blood consideration, or a consideration of 
 natural love and affection, is not sulHcient. A gift does not 
 appear to be within the provisions of our Act, nor contem- 
 jilated l)y it : a gift is neither a sale nor a mortgage, and no 
 matter what amount of good faith there may be in it, there 
 is no k'gal vahiable consideration. The Legislature, in 
 framing the Act, was not concerned about people who could 
 afford to be g(;nerous enough to make gifts to their friends; 
 it aims at compelling people to bo just towards their 
 creditors. 
 
 Where the consideration is wholly disproportionate to the 
 vahie of the goods, then there is a suspicion of fraud. 
 
 The consideration should be set out correctly, both in the 
 body of the instrument and in the affidavit ; and the precise 
 sum should be mentioned, though it will be sufficient to say 
 a certain sum, " and upwards." It will then be good for 
 the certain amount. If the amount cannot be ascertained 
 with certainty, but states a certain sum, " or thereabouts," 
 the conveyance may be upheld, if the true transaction be- 
 tween the parties is disclosed in the recitals or otherwise. 
 In a recent case,' it was decided by a majority of the Court 
 of Queen's Benck, that, as a matter of law, a chattel mort- 
 gage was not avoided by the fact of its untruly stating the 
 consideration to be $1,148, when, in reality, the amount 
 was $1,030.80; but that such erroneous statement was a 
 
 CX3 
 
 rc 
 
 ^ 
 
 Hamilton v. Harrison, 46 Q. B. 127. 
 
 o's.c. 
 
 13 
 
194 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 circumstance for the jmy to coiisifler, in deciding whether 
 tliere was fraud or no fraud.' 
 
 4. What are Goods and Chattels Within the 
 Revised Statute. The words " goods and chattels," as 
 used in the lievised Statute, have not received any statutory 
 interpretation, either in this Act or elsewhere.' It is be- 
 yond douht that they are not so comprehensive as " personal 
 estate,"' which inchides leasehold estates, money, choses in 
 action, etc. — whatever would descend to the executor or ad- 
 ministrator on the decease of the owner. The Statute of 
 Frauds uses the words "goods, wares, and merchandises,'' 
 but the scope of that statute was clearly of a wider range 
 than our provincial one, and more immediately concerns 
 general commercial transactions. 
 
 The writer does not believe that the words ' ' goods and chat- 
 tels " should be separated, so as to include certain articles 
 under goods, and certain other articles as chattels, and so 
 arrive at their full meaning by the addition of both these 
 articles. The view taken b\' Mr. Williams,'^ that goods and 
 chattels may generalh* be considered as meaning the same 
 thing, will probably be found to be correct. It has been held, 
 if one give or grant to another "all his goods," or "all his 
 chattels," by this do pass all his movable and immovable. 
 
 • Mr. Justice Armour, in (.leli\ering tho dissentient juilgmcnt in this 
 case, uses tiie followint; argument in support of his view— a view which 
 commends itself to tlic conveyancer : " Take, for example, the case of an 
 execution creditor iinding a chattel mortgage hied from his debtor, all in 
 due form, for say ?i,ooo, the full value of his debtor's goods, and making 
 up his mind from enquiries that this was a fictitious transaction, and 
 directing the sherilt to seize the goods, and the mortgagee claiming them ; 
 an issue is directed, and it is shewn that only §50 was actually advanced 
 by the mortgagee to the mortgagor; but the jury find that no moral wrong 
 was intended, and that the chattel mortgage is an honest security for the 
 950; the creditor is defeated and obliged to pay all the cdsIs, when, if the 
 chattel mortgage had contained the true amoui.t of §50 instead of $1,000 
 he would have directed the sheriff to seize and sell, the equity of redemp- 
 <tion would have paid off the ^50, and would have realized his debt." 
 
 » "Goods" is defined in the Act respecting contracts in relation to 
 goods entrusted to agents, K. S. O., cap. 121, sec. 1, to include "all per- 
 sonal property of whatever nature or kind." It is also defined in the Gen- 
 eral Railway Act, K. S. O., cap. 165. See R. S. O., cap. 116, sec. 13 ; the 
 Mercantile Amendment Act, and 43 Vic, cap. 22, sec. 45, D. Amendment 
 to the Banking Act. 
 
 3 Personal Property, page 2. 
 
in this 
 which 
 Lse of an 
 , all in 
 making: 
 on, and 
 g them ; 
 vanced 
 wrong 
 for the 
 n, if the 
 f li.ooo 
 redemp- 
 t." 
 
 ation to 
 
 all per- 
 
 the Gen- 
 
 13; the 
 
 jndment 
 
 PERSONAL PROPERTY — SALES AND MORTGAGES, ETC. 195 
 
 personal and real goods, horses and other beasts, plate, 
 jewels and household stuff, bows, weapons and sucli like, 
 and his money and his corn growing in the ground ; but not 
 the term or interest in his dwelling-house, nor his leasehold 
 estates, unless there be some term or provision in the deed 
 manifesting an intention on the part of the grantor that his 
 leasehold property should pass under the general description ; 
 nor things which he hath in safe-keeping for another ; nor 
 choses in action ; nor things of pleasure, such as hawks, 
 hounds, etc.* If this case be taken as an exposition of the 
 common law meaning of " goods and chattels," it may be 
 useful in considering our lievised Statute, so far as the ex- 
 ceptions in the case are concerned. The English Bills of 
 Sale Act uses the words *' personal estate," and defines it 
 to include fixtures capable of complete transfer. Under it if 
 the owner of the inheritance disannexes them, so as to be- 
 come transferable chattels, they come within the operation 
 of the Act, so as to require registration. As lixtures are 
 not goods, wares, and merchandises within the Statute of 
 Frauds," it will be seen that neither of these Acts can be of 
 much assistance in determining the scope of the words in 
 our Statute. 
 
 The provisions of our Act itself define pretty clearly what 
 are goods and chattels. They must be — 
 
 1. Capable of immediate delivery. 
 
 2. Capable of an actual and continued change of posses- 
 sion. 
 
 3. Capable of being readily and easily known and dis- 
 tinguished. 
 
 The Act does not appl}'' to mortgages of vessels regis- 
 tered under the provisions of any Act in that behalf, and 
 there are other provisions for the sale of vessels. This is 
 the only exception in the Act. 
 
 From the foregoing, it would appear that the goods and 
 chi\ttels must be actually (not constructively) capable of 
 
 ' Harrison v. Blackbiiru, 17 C. B. N. S. 678, and see Ringer v. Cann, 3 M. 
 & W. 343. 
 ' Per Parke^ B., i C. M. & R. 275. 
 
 c 
 
 o 
 
 /»■", 
 
 •^ 
 
 53 
 
190 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 delivery/ and of such a kind that it is possible to tell one 
 article from another. A fixture, as the name implies, is 
 incapable of delivery ; but it has 1)een held in our own 
 courts that the owner of the inheritance can sever thi- 
 chattels from the realty, and give a valid mortga;^'e thereon. 
 
 An interest in land, within the 4th section of the Statute 
 of Frauds, cannot be said to be gcods and chattels; nor is it 
 clear that all goods and chattels within the 17th section of 
 the same statute can be the subject of a chattel mortgage 
 under our Act. It is not easy to determine whether grow- 
 ing crops are or are not within the chattel mortgage Act, as 
 the authorities are conflicting. In Jjdinfi v. Ontario Snrincis' 
 Society,' ^Ir. Justice Cameron, after citing Herman on 
 Chattel ^[ortgages, p. 299, to the effect that growing crops, 
 such as wheat and corn, cotton, potatoes, the annual pro- 
 duce of labour, and cultivation of the earth, being personal 
 chattels, are the subject of a chattel mortgage, seems 
 inclined to the view that no matter whether the seeds 
 appeared above the ground or not, the land in which they 
 are sown, in either case, sufficiently identified them.* In 
 the same case, Mr. Justice Armour holds that growing 
 crops are goods and chattels, within the Chattel Mortgage 
 Act.* In the next case,* in the same volume of reports, 
 where the mortgage covered, amongst other things, 15 acres 
 of fall wheat, and 8 acres of rye, the Chief Justice and Mr. 
 Justice Cameron held these crops to be incapable of delivery 
 or change of possession, without change of occupation of 
 the land, and that the mortgage, as to them, was not within 
 the Chattel Mortgage Act. Mr. Justice Armour dissented 
 from this view. If it were not for the words in the Act as 
 to " immediate delivery " there would be no diflficulty under 
 
 » Goods in a bonded warehouse do not come within the Act so as to 
 require registration. May v. The Security Loan and Savings Society, 45 
 Q. B. 106. 
 
 '46Q. B. 114. 
 
 ' Mr. Herman, in his book on Chattel Mortgages, at the page cited, 
 thinks if the crops are above ground they can be the subject of a mortgage , 
 if under the surface not so, as they have no existence as crops. 
 
 ♦ Page 126. 
 
 5 Hamilton v. Harrison, 46 Q. B. 127. The entire judgments in this 
 case have not come to hand at the time this chapter was going to press. 
 
PERSONAL PllOrERTY — SALES AND MORTGAGES, ETC. 197 
 
 las to 
 
 b'. 45 
 
 ;ited, 
 ?age. 
 
 this 
 
 ^ss. 
 
 the authoiilies in holtliiig f];i-owing crops to be within the 
 Act. If they are not within the Act, then does the Act 
 inchide any after-acquired property ? 
 
 Certain classes of goods and chattels, though not in 
 existence at the time of the conveyance, can, nevertheless, 
 be validly sold or mortgaged, as equity will hold such goods 
 for the purpose of the conveyance, as soon as they come 
 into existence, and the purchaser or mortga^<;e can take 
 possession under the terms of his equital)lo contract. His 
 title will prevail not only against a judgment creditor, but 
 against a purchaser for value of the specilic thing, unless 
 such purchaser has fortified himself with actual possession 
 without knowledge of the contract.' These classes of 
 goods and chattels may be referred to two sources : 1st. 
 Things v,hich arc the natural product, or expected increase, 
 of something already belonging to the mortgagor ; as a crop 
 of hay, to be grown on a field ; the milk, that the cows will 
 yield during the coming month, etc. The mortgage orlien, 
 in these cases, is restricted to all such as shall arise or 
 proceed from the thing mortgaged. The fruits of the land 
 and growing crops are within this class." "ind. Such pro- 
 perty, as accrues by riglit of accession — as where la1)our is 
 bestowed on a chattel by repairs ; or where the raw 
 material is manufactured into specific articles, such as leather, 
 made into shoes, or where the propert}* in a business is dis- 
 posed of in part, converted into money, and new articles 
 purchased, these vest in the mortgagee.' 
 
 In the latter class, there would seem to be no difficulty 
 in deciding that the articles, referred to, are within the 
 terms of the Act, In the former, the dilficulty is in regard 
 to innncdidfc delivery and change of possession, sucli as the 
 Act requires. There cnn l)e no immediate delivery of 
 growing crops, as the learned Chief Justiee llagartv puts 
 it, without ii change of occupation of the land. 
 
 ' Holroyd v. Mtu shall, t,}, L. J. Chy. igj; ki H. L. Cas. 214. 
 
 - Hcnnnii on Chattel Mortgaj,'es, S5, SO. 
 
 < Ibid, ^a. See the forcible reasoning of Mr. llcrtiuin (Chattel Mort- 
 gages, pages 89-97), lin.iting mortgages on after-acquired property to these 
 two classes. 
 
 09 
 
 53 
 
 i 
 
 ■■o 
 
 S3 
 
198 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 The statute is imperative upon that point ; and the fact 
 that the goods and chattels can be dehvered in the course 
 of some months would not suffice. The crop is not only 
 incapable of immediate delivery, as there is nothing to 
 deliver that is recognized as a security ; but the seed, 
 covering so many acres, cannot be delivered at all, without 
 tlie land accompanying it. 
 
 In the present state of the authorities, a mortgagee, who 
 may be forced to include growing crops in his security, 
 might try the efficacy of going upon the land, and assum- 
 ing the occupation, till the crop is taken off — taking from 
 the mortgagor, at the same time, a written acknowledgment 
 as to the change of possession.' 
 
 There is room for amendment in the Act, in this respect. 
 
 YII. CONVEYANCES UNDERTHE REVISED STATUTE. 
 
 g b. 
 
 1. Points of similarity in Conveyances of Sales 
 and Mortgages. As a mortgage of goods and chattels 
 is a conditional sale of them, it is to be expected that there 
 are many points of similarity between the forms of the two 
 instruments. Indeed the difference is mainly confined to 
 the condition avoiding the sale, or the re-assigning clause 
 in the mortgage. 
 
 The wording of the fifth section, of the Revised Statute 
 to which we are alluding, as regards bills of Sale, and the 
 WQvding of the preceding section of the Act, as to mort- 
 gages, are /nntdtis miitandis, very nearly identical. 
 Where the possession of the goods and chattels remains 
 unchanged, then the sale, whether absolute or conditional, 
 must be a conveyance. The conveyance must be duly 
 c.vccntcd, and an ajfuhivit of the witness to such execution, 
 •ittached to the conveyance ; an qfuhtrit of the mortgagee, 
 or bargainee, or one of them, or an agent, that the sale or 
 mortgage is bona rich', and for good consideration, and not 
 
 ' Where the mortgagee takes iiossession uiuler an iinregisteted convey- 
 ance there would seem to be no (jiicslion, but that the operation of the 
 Act is excluded. See judgment of Chief Justice Hagartv in Rubins v. 
 Hhuk, 45 y. B. 360. 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — CONVEYANCES UNDER REV. STA. 199 
 
 (lulv 
 
 <lone to permit a fraud to be perpetrated upon the creditors 
 of the former owner of such goods and chattels ; and lastly 
 the conveyance (or in the case of mortgages, a copy thereof) 
 is retjistered within five days, from the execution of the con- 
 veyance, in the office of the County Court, in the county 
 wherein the goods and chattels are situate. 
 
 The transfer, whether absolute or conditional, is called a 
 conveyance. In the section respecting Bills of sale, it is 
 prescribed to be in writing — a conveyance, under the pro- 
 visions of the Act. In the fii'st section, one would suppose 
 that the word mortgage included a writing in the intention 
 of the Act ; and in the fifth, that a bill of sale of goods and 
 chattels was always without a writing. The exact converse 
 is the case, as mortgages of chattels, before the statute, 
 could have been by parol ; but sales of them could not, 
 unless complying with thu alternatives in the Statute of 
 Frauds. The impropriety of the word conveyance has been 
 referred to before ; and were it not authoritatively laid 
 down, that a conveyance, under the statute, need not be by 
 deed, a good deal might be urged on the necessity of a 
 sealed instrument. The very first requisite is, that it be 
 executed ,- and it will be pretty generally conceded, in our 
 law, that execution properly means Healing and delivery. 
 The courts, however, have rightly held that there must be 
 a positive statutory enactment, to necessitate the use of a seal, 
 in the alienation of chattel property, where such a seal 
 was not necessary at common law ; and that the common 
 law could not be enlarged, by implication, in such a statute. 
 As was seen a seal was not required at common law iu the 
 transfer of goods and chattels, except where a gift was 
 intended ; and it has also been seen that the Ilevised Statute 
 does not apply to gifts. 
 
 The witnessing is the same in both instruments, and the 
 affidavit of the purchaser or mortgagee calls for no special 
 remark. In a bill of sale it must be sworn that the sale is 
 bona jlde, and for good consideration, the amount being 
 set out, as in the conversance; and not done for the purpose 
 of holding, or to enable the bargainee to hold the goods 
 mentioned, against the creditors of the bargainor. Au 
 
 ;*... 
 
 C0 
 
 53 
 
 ■•O 
 
 m 
 
 ii 
 
200 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 ' -J 
 
 I 
 
 a*:;ent of the bargaint'e may make this atVulavit, if lie ifululy 
 authorized in writin;^, and this authority is attaclied to and 
 filed with the conveyance. In a mortgage, the mortgagee 
 must swear that the mortgagor is justly and truly indebted 
 to the mortgagee for the sum, mentioned in the mortgage ; 
 that it was extjcuted in good faith, and for the express pur- 
 pose of securing the payment of the money justly due, or 
 accruing due ; and not to protect the goods and chattels 
 mentioned, against the creditors of the mortgagor, or to 
 prevent the creditors of the mortgagor from obtaining pay- 
 ment of any claim against liira. An agent of the lum'tga- 
 gor, may make this attidavit ; he need not be authorized in 
 writing, l)ut ho must be aware of all the ciremnstances of 
 the transaction. The fact of an agent is mentioned li re as 
 a point of similarity, because an agent is permitted in either 
 a sale or a mortgage ; but the points of disagreoment in their 
 functions are more noteworthy, and will bo referred to 
 again. iJoth instruments must be tiled, as mentioned, with- 
 in five days from execution ni the proper ol'tiee ; but a bill 
 of sale is not renewed as a mortgage, and so it is tiled once 
 for all. In order to keep a mortgage security alive, a 
 renewal nnist be llled every year, till the mortgage <lebt is 
 paid oty. A description of the goods and chattels, such as 
 the statutes provides, is necessary, and identical in both 
 cases; and the other essentials to a contract, such as capa- 
 ble contracting parties, etc. The same- attention, must be 
 paid to have the date within five days of the tiling, to have 
 the conveyances duly executed, and other formalities neces- 
 sary in everv convevanee. 
 
 2. Points of disagreement in the Conveyance 
 of Sales and Mortga^^es of Chattels. It is a remark- 
 able thing tliat mortgages, whether of land or of goods 
 and chattels, should lie, so far as statutory regulations 
 are concerned, expressly limited to Ontario ; and that 
 no restriction should be made in the Acts as to sales. 
 I'egarding goods and chattels, see ihe Act of 1878, 
 amending the IJevised Statute, cap. 111). This amend- 
 ment, witliout regard to the previous section of the 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY CONVEYANCES UNDER RF-V. STA. 201 
 
 Act contemplates either a mortgagor or a bargainor, as 
 residing outside of Ontario. The goods and chattels 
 must, in both conveyances, be necessarily within the Pro- 
 vince. 
 
 Section 6 declares that a bill of sale " shall be in writing, 
 and such writing shall be a conveyance, under the pro- 
 visions of this Act." 'IMiere is nothing said about a mort- 
 gage being in writing, except in so far as the words 
 " mortgage " and " conveyance " imply it ; but as ik must 
 be executed and witnessed, and affidavits attached to it, 
 etc., it must necessarily be in writing. It is much to be 
 wondered at that so many objections being taken to bills of 
 Kale, some one did not insist on having it an " Indenture 
 of conveyance, made under the provisions of the Act 
 respecting mortgages and sales of personal property, and 
 made, etc." 
 
 In a bill of sale, the agent of the bargainee must be au- 
 thorized in writing ; this is not necessary in mortgagos, 
 though, in the lattor.case, the agent must be aware of all the 
 circumstances, and this must appear, either in the affi- 
 davit of the agent, or in some other way, from the mort- 
 gage, or other paper Hied with it.^ 
 
 The differences in the affidavits of the mortgagee and 
 bargainee have been referred to before. 
 
 A chattel mortgage must bo renewed every year, by filing 
 a statement within thirty days from the end of the year, 
 counting from the day of filing ; and this applies, not only 
 where the goods nra originally situate, but also where the goods 
 are removed to another county.^ A bill of sale cannot be 
 renewed, and is filed only once. Where a mortgagee sold 
 under his power of sale, if there is no change of possession, 
 the bill of sale must be rogistored, otherwise it will die out 
 with the mortgage under which the sale took place.' 
 
 Where a bill of sale is a security for a debt, and so in reality 
 
 53 
 d 
 
 nr 
 
 !^ 
 
 as 
 
 ■ Carlisle v. Taif, 32 U. C. C. P. 43, i'his case is in appeal. 
 
 = 44 \'ic., cap. 12, o. 
 
 3 Carlisle v. Tait, 32 U. C. C. P. 43. 
 
202 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 a mortgage, then it should be renewed every year, and 
 treated as a mortgage.' 
 
 The clause making the conveyance void on payment of 
 BO much monej', is the distinguishing feature of a mortgage. 
 
 It is recommended by the authorities to have payment 
 made in a chattel mortgage on demand; and where this is 
 the case, the debt is due immediately. It is a way, how- 
 ever, not agreeable to the mortgagor, as ho is likely to have 
 proceedings taken against him at any time. Where no 
 particular thne is specified, it will be held to be paj'able 
 witliin a reasonable time- ; and where the time for payment 
 is fixed and specified in a mortgage, the mortgagor is not 
 entitled to any other notice.* Whore a mortgage is given to 
 secure one or more notes, it is payable whenever the notes 
 mature ; and, under our statute, where the mortgage is made 
 in pursuance of an agreement for future advances, the tim© 
 for repayment must not extend for a longer jieriod than one 
 year from the date of the mortgage. Where a note is given, 
 payable at a certain time at a fixed rate of interest, and, at 
 the same time, a mortgage is given to secure the payment 
 of such note in which mortgage there is a stipulation that 
 the interest shall be paid quarterly, semi-annually, or annu- 
 ally, the note and mortgage must be construed together as 
 parts of one contract, and, so construed, the interest is 
 payable at the time specified in the mortgage.* But, where 
 notes are given collaterally with a mortgage to secure the 
 same debt, an}' words expressing an intention that the notes 
 are not to merge in the mortgage security will prevent them 
 being controlled by the terms of the mortgage. 
 
 Where a mortgage is payable by instalments, the clause 
 should read that the whole sum is to become due on de- 
 fault of any one payment. 
 
 The mortgagee is not obliged to pursue his remedies on 
 default being made, and a delay to enforce payment is not 
 
 ' See McMartiit v. McDougall, lo U. C. R. 399. 
 
 « Hcr,na>i on Chattel Mortgages, jijS. 
 
 3 Ing V. Croiimcll, 4 Md. 31. 
 
 * Herman on Chattel Mortgages, 39J ; Muzzy v. Knight, S Kans. 576. 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — CONVKYANCKS UNDER REV. STAT. 203 
 
 fraudulent.' The time of payment limited in a mortgage, 
 even where it ia under seal, has heon hold to he eapahle of 
 extension hy parol, and the condition saved until the ex- 
 piration of the extended time.* Payment, whether made 
 after default or hufore maturity, discharges the mortgage, 
 and the property then revests in the mortgagor without re- 
 delivery, or re-sale, or the cancellation of the mortgage.' As 
 the deht is the test of a mortgage, it may exist even after 
 the mortgage is discharged ; the deht exists until it is paid, 
 but, if extinguished in any way, the mortgage is at an end. 
 The del)t is the essential part of the transaction': the 
 mortgage is an accident of it. 
 
 A debt can exist, or bo made to continue as a debt, either 
 by parol, in writing, or by a sealed instrument, and is not 
 barred as between the parties in the latter case for twenty 
 3'ears. Can a debtor tie up his property for that period by 
 a chattel mortgage, securing such debt under our llevised 
 Statute ? This was, in reality, the principle involved in the 
 case of O'Xcill v. Sinall,^ the decision in which has surm'ised 
 the profession not a little. 
 
 Urn 
 
 576. 
 
 « Davis V.Evans, 5 Ired. 525. 
 
 « Flanders v. Barstow, 18 Me. 357. 
 
 1 Parks V. Hall, 2 Pick. 206. 
 
 ■• There may be a present debt payable at a future day. Farlinger v. 
 McDonald, 45 Q. B. 233. 
 
 5 15 C. L.J. 114, decided by His Honour Judge Gowan. In that case 
 the debt was payable by instalments, some of them not due for four years 
 from the date of the mortgage and the conveyance required to be 
 renewed four times in contemplation, in order to be a complete security. 
 The writer took the objection at the trial that it would be a fraud on the 
 Act to allow such a proceeding ; that a renewal could not be anticipated, 
 even for one day, prior to the last thirty days of the first year ; and that 
 the policy of the .Vet was to have payment made within the year. In the 
 section relating to promissory notes and future advances, where the trans- 
 action was likely to be e.^tended over a considerable period, the Act 
 restricted it to one year ; so, when the debt was a present one, the case was a 
 fortiori. The learned Judge took aniiile time to consider this case, and 
 decided on the gruund.s taken at the trial and in term, at)d every opportu- 
 nity was afforded to have the case stated by him for the Court of Appeal, 
 authoritatively decided, but nothing came of it. Several County 
 Judges have refused to follow it, and the profession have, very generally, 
 been unwilling to believe such to be the true construction of the policy of 
 the Act. It is said also, that the present Chief Justice of Ontario, sitting as 
 Chancellor, over-ruled it ; but the decision is not to be found in the reports. 
 The writer has seen or heard nothing, since the judgment of Judge Gowan, 
 to change his views on the subject. Where neither the interest nor princi- 
 pal is due within the year, it would seem to be difiicult for the mortgagee 
 
204 
 
 Pr.ACTICAIi CONVFYANCINO. 
 
 ? 
 
 
 Apart from whatever may bo tlio law on the limit of the* 
 time of re-payment, it would i>o cxtrcmuly injudicious to 
 have the term cxttsiid beyond a year — the debt should bo 
 co-extensive with the security, which, for many purposes, 
 must bo an <iiinn(tl one ; and if any slip were made as to tlio 
 renewal, an intervening execution creilitor would cut out 
 the mortgagee. Where an entirely now mortgage must bj 
 taken, the difioronce is very material from renewing an 
 old one. 
 
 The preservation of the property while in the possession 
 of the f.)rmer owner or mortgagor, is ji very imi)ortant part 
 to consider. Whilst the ro'ustration of a valid convevance 
 will protect the mortgagee or purchaser against the creditors 
 or other purchasers or mortgagees of the same property, 
 it is no protection against the acts of the vendor or mort- 
 gagor, lie mny dissipate it, or allow it to become useless 
 or wortldess ; may put it out of his possession or protec- 
 tion, or may fail to take the necessary precautions to have 
 it insured. To provide against these, especially in a mort- 
 gage, is of great importance. 
 
 It usually happens that a person who gives a bill of 
 sale or chattel mortgage is a temmt, and so the goods 
 mortgaged may be seized for non-payment of rent. No 
 provision can be made against this under our law as it now 
 stands; but an agreement miglit bo entered into with the 
 landlord that lie must not permit the rent to run in arrear, 
 or that if he does so, then he shall have priority over the 
 mortgagee to the extent of one payment only. If the 
 landlord M'ill not do this, then the time of re-payment in 
 the mortgage should be made about ten days or so before 
 the rent falls in arrear; and then if the mortgagee has the 
 
 to swear to "a full statement of the amount still due for principal an.l 
 interest thereon, and of all jiayments made on account thereof ;" the re- 
 newal apparently supposes tht; debt overdue. If A. owes J5. a sum of 
 money due on a bond, payalde, savin sixteen years, oui^'ht this to be capable 
 of being secured by a chattel mortf,',if;e ? If an execution creditor of A.s 
 sold his ecpiity of redemption, what value would it be till the mortgagee's 
 debt were due, and he be forced to take his money ? And how could the 
 mortgagee make on oath at the end of each year, that there was still due 
 to him a certain sum, when in fact nothing was due or owing him ? It 
 must assuredly be a present debt, jiayable at . future day. Farliuger v. Mc- 
 Donald, supra. The revised statute does not concern the immediate parties. 
 
PKIISONAI. I'ROIM'.RTY — CONVKYANCKS INDRIl RKV. 8TA. 205 
 
 al an. I 
 
 the re- 
 
 um i>f 
 
 apable 
 
 of A.s 
 
 gaRee's 
 
 Id the 
 
 /// dut' 
 
 n? It 
 
 ■- V. Mc- 
 
 arties. 
 
 pi'oprrtv Hold ami oil* tlio picinlsDiH bcforo tlio laiullortl can 
 (llstrain, ho is iirotccted. Jlowovrr liaiil this iimy he on 
 the hin(lh)nl, it is not ho had as allowing tho rent lo accu- 
 miihiti) HO as to dofoat the nu)rt;j;aKee. 
 
 Tho distress autliorizod to bo made for non-})aymont of 
 taxes, etc., can nt>t he met exactly in this] way, and tho 
 mortj^'a^'ee may iVeciuently reckon on iiavin},' to advance 
 tliem. 
 
 The chiuso as to insurance sliould not bo forjjotten, and 
 the amount i)Iaced somewhat in advance of the h)an or 
 interest of the new owner. Tho insuraneo hIiouM be 
 ejected before tlie conveyances are delivered ; for if tho 
 contract were complete, tho loss would fall on tho purchaser 
 if the premises were burnt dovvn. In the same way, if the 
 mort|,'ageo's money was paid over, and a loss to hai)pGn, 
 his security would bo gone, except whatever the mort- 
 j^'agor's covenant may ])v worth — and, j^enerally, such cove- 
 nant is of no value. The purchaser or mortgagee should 
 see, not only that the goods and chattels are insured, but 
 that they are kept insured. 
 
 As to removal of the goods, a clause is always inserted, 
 tliat they are not to be removed without the consent of the 
 purchaser or mortgagee. This clause should confine them 
 to the premises on which the goods and chattels are 
 situate, and not merely the street or farm, as the latter 
 has given rise to difHcultios. 
 
 No provision can be made ordinarily to prevent a dis- 
 honest vendor or mortgagor, who retains the goods in his 
 possession, from carrying tliem away under cover of dark- 
 ness, or in any other secret way, whore the party entitled is 
 not made aware of such fraudulent removal. 
 
 As to the dissipation or deterioration in value of the 
 goods, unless with a special clause, there is no remedy 
 therefor ; and a mortgagee may be helpless to prevent the 
 entire destruction of his seciurity, or what he fancies his 
 security, without being able to arrest it. 
 
 As was said in a former chapter, the personal covenant 
 in a land mortgage is always of considerable value, and 
 
 53 
 
 O 
 
200 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 ■I 
 
 <: 
 
 Hhould not bo noglectod ; in the case of a chattel mortgage, 
 the personal covenant is not regarded at all ; but what is 
 of consequence, is the personal character of the vendor or 
 mortgagor, and his desire to make the most of his property 
 by guarding it and preserving it as far as possible. 
 
 3. Form of the Conveyance. The requisites of a 
 conveyance, under the Act, may be dismissed without any 
 lengthy remarks. 
 
 It requires, of course, parties competent to enter into a 
 contract ; i>ropfr conveying nordg ; the consideration or debt; 
 and, where necessary, the intention of the parties to be 
 expressed in recitals ; a description of the goods and chat- 
 tels, to satisly the Act ; execution of the conveyance, though 
 it need not be under seal ; necessary affidavits ; delivery of 
 the instrument ; and, registration in the proper office, within 
 live days after execution. The parts, peculiar to a mort- 
 gage, such as the repayment clause, the covenants and pro- 
 visos, and the annual renewal, while the debt is unpaid, have 
 been referred to before. 
 
 The conveying words, generally used, are "grant, bargain, 
 sell, and assign ;" but any words going to shew that an 
 absolute or conditional sale was intended, are sufiicient. 
 
 Kecitals are used under the Gth section, to set out the 
 nature of the agreement for future advances ; but the fact 
 of the agreement may appear in any other sufiicient way. 
 Great care must be used in setting out the agreement, so 
 that it corresponds with the consideration, as stated. 
 
 The description of the goods and chattels, in the con- 
 veyance, becomes, at times, a very embarrassing matter. 
 
 ^Vliere they are of such a kind, that a specific description 
 can be given, then such description should never be omitted. 
 
 The statute (sec. 23) requires " such sufficient and full 
 description thereof, that the same may be thereby readily 
 and easily known and distinguished." Without reference 
 to the cases that abound in the reports on the meaning of 
 this section, it is clear that according to the statute, 
 the goods and chattels must be described so fully and 
 sufliciently that a bailiff, with the conveyance or inven- 
 
PERSONAL TROrERTY — CONVEYANCES UNDER REV. STA. 207 
 
 con- 
 ter. 
 ription 
 nitted. 
 d full 
 eadily 
 erence 
 ling of 
 [itute, 
 y' and 
 inven- 
 
 tory in his hand, could identify them. The statute 
 expects that this must be capable of being done 
 "readily and casil}- ;" but it is not necessary that a 
 deed should contain all that is required to enable a person 
 to distinguish the articles of property by merely casting 
 his eye upon them.* Where a minute description is impossi- 
 ble, general words are sometimes given effect to'; but, as a 
 rule, general words are insufficient. Where, therefore, the 
 description was only " all and singular m}' stock-in-trade, 
 chattels, del)ts, etc.," or, " all my personal estate and 
 effects whatsoever, and wheresoever,'" or, " all my stock- 
 in-trade, goods, wares, and merchandise, in my store, 
 situate at, etc,^" it could scarcely be said to be sufficiently 
 specific. 
 
 There is no difficulty in stating the precise locality, and 
 this should never be omitted, although it is sometimes 
 assumed to refer to the parties' residence.* 
 
 Property described as chattels, simply or as a class, can- 
 not ordinarily be identified, without correct locality, and 
 so to descril)e a chattel as " one single buggy,'"' or " one 
 sorrel horse,'" or " two sets of black-smithing and one set 
 of waggon-maker's tools, complete,''" without adding the 
 locality, is objectionable. Some kinds of specific chattels, 
 such as " one omnibus,* " or " one stumping machine," " 
 may, from their importance, or easy identification, be held 
 to be sufficiently described as such. 
 
 But, where the locality is correctly set out, general 
 words, describing the stock-in-trade, as of a particular busi- 
 ness, or of a certain character, such as household furniture, 
 in as definite a manner as it is possible to make the des- 
 
 ' Holt V. Carntichacl, 2 Ont. App. 639. 
 
 " Harris v. Cuiitmcrciul Bank, 16 U. C. K. 437. 
 
 3 Hulvcll V. McFnrhiHC, 16 U. C. K. 4C9. 
 
 * Hutchison v. Roberts, 7 C. P. 470. 
 
 ' Frascr v. The Bank of Toronto, 19 U. C. R. j8i. 
 ' Holt V. Cannichail, 2 Ont. App. Gjq. 
 ^ Monti^omery v. Wright, 8 Mich. 143. 
 
 * Mason v. Macdonald, 25 C. P. 435. 
 '' Mills V. King, 14 C. P, 223. 
 
 'f Bertram v, Pendry, 27 U. C. R. 377. 
 
 as 
 
 53 
 
 d 
 
 s 
 
208 
 
 PRACTICAL COXVEYAXCING. 
 
 £ 
 
 crii>tion, may Le found to be sufficient'; but such general 
 phrases as " stock-in-traJe," " all my personal estate," 
 *'all my goods," are of themselves insufficient. 
 
 Ln thu United States, parol evidence is generally admitted 
 to identify the property ; but the conveyance, under our 
 statute, must contain within itself the means of identifj'ing 
 it. The latest authority, on chattel mortgages, lays down 
 the doctrine that growing crops can onlj' be identified 
 by parol evidence, and that the same principle applies to 
 lumber cut from saw logs.- The question of after acquired 
 property has Ijeen referred to in this chapter, siijn-a. 
 
 4. Rights of the Parties. When there is a redemise 
 clause in the mortgage, the mortgagee cannot take posses- 
 sion until default — until his debt is due. If there is no re- 
 demise clause, he is entitled to possession on the execution 
 of the conveyance"; but where the goods are taken by a 
 third person as an execution creditor, the mortgagee is 
 then unable to require possession. If the goods are 
 bailed before the mortgage, it has been held that the mort- 
 gagee can recover from the bailee. 
 
 After default, the mortgagee may sell the goods or fore- 
 close them. He must not sell more than sufficient to pay 
 his debt, and must take the usual precautions of a trustee 
 for sale. He will not be allowed a benefit of a sale made 
 by him where he himself was purchaser, and he must fol- 
 low strictly the terms of his mortgage, otherwise he may be 
 let in for damages ; but he is not obliged to act immediately 
 on default being made. He can assign the mortgage debt, 
 or part of it, and the security with it, so as to give his 
 assignee, or any subsequent assignee, rights co-extensive 
 with his own ; and he cannot affect such assignee's rights 
 after assignment. If he goes in possession, he must act as 
 
 ;,/?# Thirkell Perrin v. Wood, 21 Chy. 492 ; Wilson v. Kerr, 18 U. C. R. 
 470. 
 « Jones on Chattel Mortgages, citing White v. Brown, 12 U. C. R. 477. 
 
 3 The writer entirely agrees with the dissenting judgment of Mr. Justice 
 Gwynne in Macaulay v. Allen, 20 C. P. 407, and with the cogent and 
 learned argument of Mr. Herman that this should not be the law. See 
 Keech v. Hall, i Sm. L. cases, 523 (notes), as to the law in this matter. 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — CONVEYANCES UNDER REV. STA. 209 
 
 fore- 
 
 .C. R. 
 
 477- 
 (ustice 
 It and 
 See 
 ter. 
 
 a prudent owner, though he is not owner in reahty, and 
 must bear any loss accruing to such property while he is in 
 possession. He must comply with the statutory regulations 
 as to conveyance, affidavits, liling, etc., so far as creditors, 
 or subsequent purchasers, or mortgagees in good faith, are 
 concerned; but the mortgagor or other person, except 
 those referred to, cannot take objection to a want of com- 
 pliance with the statute. 
 
 He can insure the property, and has an insurable interest 
 thereon to the extent of his loan, and up to the time the deljt 
 is paid; but, in the event of a loss, cannot recover insurance 
 money effected by the mortgagor on his own interest, unless 
 the mortgagor assigned it to him. 
 
 When the debt is paid off he must discharge the mort- 
 gage on a proper discharge being tendered to him for that 
 purpose. 
 
 Where there is a redemise clause, as has been mentioned, 
 the mortgagor is entitled to possession until default; and lie 
 cannot be turned out on default until a reasonable time 
 after a demand or notice has been served on him. 
 
 As to the power of a mortgagor to sell or mortgage his 
 interest in the property, there would seem to bo some con- 
 flict of opinion. The American authorities say that there 
 is nothing fraudulent or wrong in a mortgagor disposing of 
 the mortgaged property, subject to the lien of the mortgage.' 
 On the other hand, it is laid down that if he attempts to 
 sell his interest absolutely, this determines his possession, and 
 the mortgagee can recover at once against the purchaser.* 
 This case, if followed now, would entail serious loss on a 
 mortgagor. The American authorities cited must refer to 
 the cases where there is no change of possession. In every 
 well-drawn mortgage there should be a proviso for posses- 
 sion, where the mortgagor sells, or attempts to s^ll the 
 goods outside of the provisions of the Revised Statute — that 
 is, where there is a delivery and change of possession. 
 
 ' Herman on Chattel Moitga;?es, 473, and Hodson v. Treat, 7 Wis. 263. 
 
 = Locschman v. Machiii, z Stark, N. P. C. 311 ; Cooper v. yVillomiiitt, i 
 C, B. 672. 
 
 o's.c. 14 
 
 CO 
 
 cr 
 
 -"••"I 
 
 m 
 
210 
 
 PRACTICAIi CONVEYANCING. 
 
 Mr. Herman, on Chattel Mortgages, p. 473, also cites 
 uutlioiity to show that a mortgagor has no right to effect a 
 second mortgage on the property to the prejndice of the 
 mortgagee's rights; and if he mortgage the entire property 
 to another without notice of the prior mortgage, and per- 
 mits the suhsequent mortgagee to take possession, such 
 mortgagor is liable to the first mortgagee for trover for a 
 tortious conversion. 
 
 Where a first mortgage is duly registered, it must be held 
 to be notice to a subsequent purchaser or mortgagee, who 
 can claim no more than the mortgagor could give them. 
 Second mortgages on chattel property are quite common in 
 this Province, and the Registration Ofiice affords informa- 
 tion to a second mortgagee as to the condition and title of 
 the property in question. 
 
 The mortgagor can always redeem the property till fore- 
 closure. When the mortgagee's debt is satisfied his title 
 ceases, and the debtor maj' at any time after default, and 
 before sale or foreclosure, extinguish the charge, by paying 
 the debt, interest, etc. The mortgagor is, in effect, the 
 owner until sale or foreclosure, subject to the charge ; and the 
 title of the mortgagee does not seem to be absolute on de- 
 fault being made, and his riglit to redemption cannot be 
 waived. 
 
 He has an insurable interest in the goods mortgaged to 
 their full value, and an insurance effected by him cannot 
 ij>so facto be claimed by the mortgagee ; but where there ia 
 an agreement to insure, or the insurance money is assigned 
 to the mortgagee, then the latter is entitled to the money. 
 
 Where a mortgagee has taken possession, or has sold the 
 property mortgaged, he must account for the proceeds to 
 the mortgagor. 
 
 On payment of the mortgage debt to the mortgagee, or 
 any assignee, the mortgagor is entitled to have a statutory 
 discharge of his mortgage executed by the party entitled to 
 receive the money. 
 
PKRSONAL PnOPERTY — SALES AND MORTGAGES, ETC. 211 
 
 SO cites 
 effect a 
 i of the 
 iropei'ty 
 iiicl per- 
 >n, such 
 rer for a 
 
 t be held 
 gee, who 
 ve them, 
 mmon in 
 informa- 
 fl title of 
 
 till fore- 
 liis title 
 iiult, and 
 >y paying 
 ffect, the 
 ; and the 
 te on de- 
 !annot be 
 
 gaged to 
 in cannot 
 there is 
 assigned 
 8 money. 
 s sold the 
 oceeds to 
 
 ;gagee, or 
 statutory 
 ntitled to 
 
 Vni. SALES AND MORTGAGES OF VESSELS. 
 
 Wherever there is more than one owner in a ship or 
 vessel, the right or property in the vessel must he divided 
 into shares, and the number of shares held by each 
 owner registered. There cannot be more than thirty- 
 two legal owners, but a iirm or partnership may hold 
 one share without regard to the number of members 
 in the firm. When the necessary particulars as to 
 ownership, build and description of the vessel have been 
 duly declared and registered, a certificate of such regis- 
 try, embodying such particulars, is to be granted ; and 
 on the back of this certificate is to be endorsed the 
 names of the owners and the number of shares they 
 hold. Copies of the declaration of ownership, taken from 
 the registers, or certified to be copies by persons having 
 charge of the originals, are prima facie evidence of 
 all matters contained or recited in the registers, or 
 endorsed in the certificates. 
 
 The certificate of registry is, therefore, evidence of the 
 ownership and right of property of every registered vessel, 
 and should be produced to every intended purchaser of the 
 vessel, or any share or shares therein, and should be com- 
 pared with the registers. When the vendor is not the 
 builder, then the title should bo traced by the production 
 of the bill of sale or transfer, under which he claims, as 
 well as the certificate of registry. Where the certificate of 
 registry has been lost, mislaid or destroyed, no new certi- 
 ficate of registry is to be issued under our Act * amending 
 The Merchant Shipping Act, 1854, without proof on both 
 in regard to the loss, etc., of the former certificate. 
 
 A ship must be registered in her true name, and such 
 name cannot be changed except by the previous permission 
 of the Governor-in-(yOuncil.* 
 
 A ship, under the Act 36 Vic, cap. 1'28, D., includes 
 every description of vessel used in navigation not propelled 
 
 09 
 
 53 
 
 nr 
 
 '^ 
 
 » 36 Vic, cap. 12S, sec. 15 D. 
 '■' Ibid, sec. 22. 
 
212 
 
 TRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 by oars' ; but the provisions as to measurement and regis- 
 tration do not apply to — 
 
 1. Ships having a whole or fixed deck, not propelled 
 wholly or in part by steam, and not exceeding ten tons 
 burthen. 
 
 2. Ships not propelled wholly or in part by steam, and not 
 having a whole or fixed deck, whatever their burthen." 
 
 Shi';s entitled to be registered as British ships in Canada, 
 under the Act, are entered in the office of the collector or 
 other principal officer of customs, as appointed by the 
 Governor -in-Council, and every person is entitled to have 
 acc< to ihe register of any ship registered in Canada 
 at the p\)i t < ■ registry of such ship.* 
 
 The Merchaiit Shipping Act of 1854,* which is not repealed 
 by our * >^.rDinion Act, except as to inconsistent provisions, 
 makes provibion for V.^c sale or transfer of a ship by bill of 
 sale.* It must recite such description of the ship as is 
 contained in the certificate of the surveyor ,or other descrip- 
 tion necessary to identify the ship to the satisfaction of the 
 collector of customs or other registrar. The form given in 
 the Act must be followed ; and, immediately on the execu- 
 tion of the instrument, the vendee becomes entitled to all 
 the benefits and liabilities of ownership. It is his duty tc 
 see that the bill of sale is registered.* On a sale by a 
 sheriff on an execution, however, it was held not necessary 
 that the transfer be registered, or that it should recite the 
 certificate of ownership.* 
 
 Where a vessel does not come within the class requiring 
 registration, a written instrument is not necessary to pass 
 the property therein." But it is apprehended this refers 
 only to the immediate parties, as in the case of any other 
 chattel ; and so as to creditors and subsequent purchasers 
 
 • 36 Vic, cap. 128, sec. 4. 
 » Ibid, sec. 7. 
 
 » Ibid, sec. 11-17. 
 
 * 17 & iS Vic, cap. 104 (Imp.) See also C. S. C. cap. 41. 
 s The Spirit of the Ocean, 34 L. J. Ad. 74. 
 
 « Smith V. Bro'iVn, 14 U. C. R. 9. 
 ^ Chisholm v. Potter. 11 C. P. 165. 
 
 ■i^ 
 
luirmg 
 
 |o pass 
 
 refers 
 
 other 
 
 liasers 
 
 PERSONAL PROPERTY — SALES AND MORTGAGES, ETC. 213 
 
 in good faith, there would seem to be no reason why the bill 
 of sale of an unregistered vessel should not come within 
 the terms of R. S. 0., cap. 119. It is to be noted that 
 sec. 26 of that Act says nothing whatever as to sales of 
 vessels.* 
 
 The Revised Statute of Ontario, cap. 119, does not 
 apply to mortgages of vessels registered under the provi- 
 sions of any Act on that behalf. 
 
 36 Vic, cap. 128, D., is the Act under which provision 
 is made for the registration of mortgages of vessels. 
 
 Where a ship is about to be built, or is being built, it 
 may be recorded under a temporary name, at the nearest 
 port ; and the builder, having furnished the registrar of 
 shipping with a description of the ship and a statement of 
 the intended port of registry, and other requirements, 
 the ship can then be mortgaged under the form prescribed 
 by the Act, and duly entered in the record book.* 
 
 There may be several mortgages, which are to be 
 recorded as produced to the registrar (sec. 38), and the 
 mortgagees rank according to the dates of their mortgages, 
 notwithstanding any express, implied or constructive 
 notice (sec. 40). When payment is made by the mort- 
 gagor, who is deemed to be the owner (sec. 41), the mort- 
 gage can be discharged (sec. 39). The mortgagee has 
 power of sale, and is not affected by the insolvency of his 
 mortgagor. 
 
 Any recorded mortgage can bo transferred to any person 
 by an assignment in the form given by the Act. When 
 the .ship i.s built, all tho recorded mortgages then undi.s- 
 obarged are registered in ilio register book. 
 
 These regulations as to mortgages, it will be seen, apply 
 to mortgages of ships while in course of construction. The 
 Act of 1854 or the C. S. C, cap. 41, must be looked at iu 
 reference to other mortgages thereon. 
 
 S3 
 
 s 
 
 ' See Herman on Chattel Mortgages, 71, and Lcland v. The Medora, 2 W. 
 & M. 92. 
 
 • 36 Vic, cap. 128, sec. 36-37 D. 
 
214 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 The Imperial Act of 1854 was amended by an Act passed 
 in 25 & 26, Vic, cap. 63, giving in effect a power to mort- 
 gage vessels generally. Tliis power was doubted by the Court 
 of Chancery as existing under the prior Act. The late Act 
 recognized equities as enforceable against owners and 
 mortgagees of ships, in respect of their interest therein, in 
 the same manner as equities may be enforced against them, 
 in respect of any other personal property.* 
 
 The amended Act must be in force in Canada. In the 
 2nd sec. of our Act of 1 873, referred to, it is recited : ** And 
 whereas, by the five hundred and forty-seventh section of 
 TJic Merchant SJtij^ping Act, 1854, it was enacted and pro- 
 vided that the legislative authority of any British possession 
 shall have power by any Act or Ordinance, confirmed by 
 Her Majesty in Council, to repeal, wholly or in part, any 
 provision of the said Act relating to ships registered in 
 such possession, so much of the said Act, and of any other 
 Act, amending the said Act, and forming part of the same, 
 as is inconsistent with this Act, is hereby repealed, so far 
 as relates to shij)s registered in Canada." * 
 
 g 
 
 i^ 
 
 I 
 
 IX. LEASES OF GOODS AND CHATTELS. 
 
 Goods and chattels may be let for years, though the terms 
 landlord and tenant are inapplicable to such letting, as the 
 interest of the lessee therein differs from the interest which 
 he has in lands, as do also the duties of the lessor. 
 
 A lease may be made of stock, or of live cattle, so as to 
 convey the property therein for the specified term; and 
 during that time the lessee, though he is entitled to the 
 young, cannot kill or give any of them away.- During 
 the term, the lessor has nothing to do with them, and he 
 has no reversion thereiii, as they may not outlive the term ; 
 but if they die, he is not obliged to replace them. The 
 lessor cannot distrain, unless the goods and chattels are 
 mixed up with land, as in the case of a house and furniture.' 
 
 • Ward V. Beck, 32 L. J. C. P. 113. See Addison on Contracts, as to the 
 provisions of 25 & 26 Vic, cap. 63, in this behalf. 
 
 ■ Litt. s. 71, and Doe d. Griffith v. Lloyd, 3 Esp. 78. 
 
 3 Nctvman v. Anderton, 2 B. & P.224. 
 
PERSONAL PROPERTY — LEASES OF GOODS AND CHATTELS. 215 
 
 passed 
 3 mort- 
 e Court 
 ate Act 
 rs and 
 rein, in 
 ;t them. 
 
 In the 
 *' And 
 ction of 
 nd pro- 
 ssession 
 med by 
 irt, any 
 tered in 
 ly other 
 le same, 
 1, so far 
 
 le terms 
 
 , as the 
 
 3t which 
 
 > 
 
 so as to 
 
 m; and 
 
 to the 
 
 During 
 
 and he 
 
 le term ; 
 
 n. The 
 
 itels are 
 
 rniture.' 
 
 If there is an execution against the owner, the goods leased 
 cannot be taken, if they are in the possession of the lessee ' ; 
 but if the executicm is agahist the tenant, the lessor would 
 seem to have no remcily. However, if the interest of the 
 tenant is conditioned to cease on the goods being taken in 
 execution, the owner may, it seems, recover them, even 
 from the sheriff." 
 
 In the recent case of Oliver v. Neivhoiise* the authoritii'S, 
 in regard to a lease, or a bailment of chattels are con- 
 sidered, and the Court of Common Pleas was apparently 
 divided upon the inference to be drawn from undisputed 
 facts, in order to shew a sale or a lease. Mr. Justice Osier 
 says : "If the identical articles were to be returned, the 
 transaction would be a lease, but if they were not neccs- 
 sanly to be returned, but only in the same kind, and to the 
 same value — and that is, I understand, tlie effect of the evi- 
 dence — it would, as the authorities I have referred to shew, 
 be a sale." Chief Justice Wilson, in the same case, says : " I 
 do not understand the law to be, nor that it is contended to 
 be, that, upon the demise of personal chattels, the lessee 
 may sell or convert them as he pleases, or that he may 
 keep them and substitute others for them, or pay their 
 price in money, or that the absolute property in them can 
 be sold for his debts. The lessor has only parted with a 
 limited interest as to time in them, and he is entitled, at 
 the end of that term, to the re-delivery of them. ' " 
 
 • Izod V, Lamb, i Cr, & J. 35. 
 
 ' Berry v. Heard, Cr. Car. 327; Bythewood, Leases, 548-551. 
 3 32 U. C. C. p. 90. This case is in appeal. 
 
 * Cordon V. Harper, 7 T. R. g; Fcnn v. Bittlcstonr, y P^x. 152. The 
 learned Chief Justice of the Common Pleas Division refers to the la^v gen- 
 erally in a lease of chattels, citing other authorities than those referred to. 
 His judgment came to hand while this chapter was being set up. 
 
 22 
 
 4. ■•?• 
 
 '^ 
 
 s, as to the 
 
CHAPTER IX. 
 
 WILLS. 
 
 I. Preliminary. 
 II. Soundness of Mind. 
 
 III. Undue Influence. 
 
 IV. Other Disabilities. 
 
 V. TheWills' Act OF Ontario. 
 
 VI. Instructions for drawing 
 A Will. 
 
 V'll. FOR.M, ETC., OF THE INSTRU- 
 MENT. 
 
 VIII. E.XECUTION : 
 
 r. Signature. 
 2. Witnesses, etc, 
 
 IX. Revocation. 
 X. Registration. 
 XI. Probate. 
 
 I. PRELIMINARY. . 
 
 A •will is not regarded by professional men as a docu- 
 ment that anybody can draw correctly. From the propor- 
 tion of cases arising out of wills, it may be almost said in 
 this country, as it has been said in England, that probably 
 three-fourths of the litigation is in reference to the con- 
 struction or genuineness of wills. This has led some jurists 
 to question the wisdom of allowing any person to control 
 his property after his death ; and to hold up for imitation 
 the times anterior to the Tudor period, when the dispo- 
 sition of a man's property depended on his dealings with 
 it in his lifetime. Others, with more reason, apj)laud the 
 French system, which, though it allows a testamentary 
 disposition, still holds it within certain limits — viz., that 
 the property should not be willed outside the family, etc. 
 This will reminds the student of the peculiar xsrincipleti 
 
WILLS — PRELIMINARY. 
 
 217 
 
 involved in the Roman law,' and which are lost sight of iu 
 the sweeping powers allowed by the laws of England and 
 of this Province. The law here allows to the subject the 
 liberty to do what he likes with his own, whether he abso- 
 lutely disposes of it during life or by will. The testator, 
 whether as the result of mature deliberation or whim, or 
 of a sudden fit of passion, can generally disinherit his own 
 family, giving his property to a stranger, and leaving his 
 own offspring without even the customary shilling." An 
 exception to this absolute power of disposition may be found 
 in the case of a married woman, whose right to devise her 
 property outside of her own family, or favour one child to 
 the exclusion of the others, is still questioned.* 
 
 While this wide liberty is allowed, the law must be satis- 
 fied that the testator had sufficient capacity to deal with 
 the matters embraced in the will, and that ho was not 
 unduly influenced in the disposition made ; and also that 
 he made his will openly, in the presence of at least two 
 witnesses. 
 
 The practitioner who is called upon to prepare a will, 
 knows, therefore, beforehand, that there is always a possi- 
 bility of future litigation, no matter how apparently the 
 will is made toward the testator's relatives. If the property 
 does not go to his relatives, then there is a common cause, 
 from their point of view, against the obnoxious recipient. 
 If it be divided, no matter how equitably, among them- 
 selves, the recipients of the smaller shares make battle 
 against their more fortunate brethven, with an acrimonious- 
 ness if anything more bitter than against a stranger. So 
 true it is, that friends or relatives are the most irrecon- 
 cilable of litigants — the most exacting of each other, anil 
 the least vielding of themselves. 
 
 ' The "inofficious" will of the Roman law was one where the natural 
 affection and the claims of near relationship were disrc.'^Mrded. 
 
 - See Parkliiirst v. Roy, where a testator in Ontarin devised some of his 
 property to the State of Vermont, and the devise was upheld as to the 
 property not within the Mortmain Acts. 27 Chy. 361. This case is now 
 in appeal. 
 
 3 Mimro V. Svuirt, 4 Ont. App. 449. 
 
 CO 
 
 CD- 
 
 1 
 
i>18 
 
 PIUCTICAL CONVn'iANCINO. 
 
 Witli such prospects in viow, there should, of course, bo 
 ^reat caution used, an<l all possihlc steps taken to effoctuato, 
 in a way Hkely to stand, the intentions of the expected 
 tentator. 
 
 II. SOUNDNESS OF MINI). 
 
 One of the common ol)jections to a will now-a-days — an 
 objection so common in the United States as to make it 
 expected — is, that the deceased was not of sound mind — 
 that he was insane — that he had no disposing capacity. In 
 regard to this, it must be stated that a legal practitioner, 
 unless he has made the matter a special study, knows as 
 little about the medical symptoms or tests of insanity as 
 any other unskilled person. His education, generally, no 
 more fits him to be a judge of sanity than to be a judge of 
 any other normal condition of the human body. He views 
 insanit}' just as any other person who is not a medical man 
 — by the acts and conduct of the party affected. Soni' 
 medical practitioners take a totally different view. With 
 such it is a disease ; and, though they may judge of the 
 disease by the acts of their patient,these form only one series 
 of facts in their diagnosis. They conclude, when the mind 
 is diseased, each act as flowing from a diseased mind is an 
 insane act. 
 
 Where a man's sanity is questioned, a lawyer can but 
 carefully note what he sees and hears ; but he is not to set- 
 tle the case in his own judgment so as to refuse to draw the 
 will. A case recently happened where a lawyer refused to 
 draw a Avill for the deceased, and the Court was of opinion 
 that it would have been better had he done so ; and, if the 
 testator were found to be insane, the will could have been set 
 aside. This would entail less injustice than not permitting 
 a man, actually sane, though reputed otherwise, from dis- 
 posing of his property as he thought fit. It may well hap- 
 pen, that a man's household would be divided as to his 
 sanity, and that those who were well remembered in his 
 will would assert his sanity, and those not so fortunate 
 would be willing to swear that they always knew he was 
 
WILLS — SOl'NPNKSS OF MINI>. 
 
 21a 
 
 *P5 
 
 dis- 
 
 not right in his mind ; yet, a lawyer called in, is surely not 
 to decide the question, and iKrhiips do a positivt; wrong/ 
 
 It may ho well for hoth solicitor and witnesses to attest 
 the fact in some formal way when they havegravi' douhts 
 as to the testamentary capacity of the deceased. 
 
 The legal adviser will alwavs he one of the main witnes- 
 ses in the case, and so it hehooves him to make the most of 
 his visits in estimating how far his client may have the 
 necessary mens diH))i)n<'iuli. Tin; clearness with which ho 
 may know of his relatives, and the value of his own i)rop- 
 erty, may he important data in the ahsence of any recollec- 
 tion upon conversations outside of the professional visit ; and 
 therefore, it is well that the professional man should take 
 down, in the language of the deceased, all that he gives him 
 as to his property and the henelici.irics, and carefully pre- 
 serve the memorandum, so as therel)y to aid in the consid- 
 eration of the question, should it afterwards he raised, of 
 the mental capacity of his client. Any extraordinary or 
 rather unexpected devise or Request should he discussed, 
 and the reasons noted separately, to he weighed according 
 to their adequacy. Any omission should be discussed also. 
 It may he mentioned, that to answer familiar and usual 
 questions, is not alone sufficient evidence of the necessR-ry 
 will-making capacity. The person ought to have a dis- 
 posing memory, so as to be able to recollect the value and 
 amount of his property, and those who should primarily be 
 the recipients of his bounty, and thus be entitled to make 
 a disposition of his estate with understanding and reason." 
 A man confined in an asylum may be, and, indeed, has 
 been, declared capable of making a will,* judging ])y the 
 reasonableness of its provisions, and the apparent absence, 
 at the time of the making of the will, of the delusion, the 
 presence of which necessitated his coniinement in the 
 asylum. 
 
 C30 
 
 53 
 
 ^ 
 
 3 
 
 ' Brown on Insanity, p. 126. 
 
 ' Marquess of Winchester case, 6 Rep. 23 a. 
 
 ^ Per Lord Eldon, McAdain v. Walter i Dow. 178 ; Cartwright v. Cart- 
 uright, Phillim, 90. 
 
220 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 «■■'., 
 r 
 
 c;; 
 
 A will made in a lucid ?;j<^?/T(/Zisas validas if the testator 
 were never insane ; but the difficulty is to prove that the 
 mind was sufficiently restored. It need not be completely 
 in its former condition. 
 
 Mere physical weakness, however great, without proof of 
 mental incapacity, is not sufficient to render invalid ar ac- 
 knowledgment of a debt by a testator,' and would not affect 
 his will, even though he was so extremely weak in body and 
 mind that his directions were given at intervals, and were 
 difficult to understand, and the will probably not containing 
 (ill his intentions.' And the English doctrine, that where 
 the testator appreciated clearly the value and extent of his 
 property and the objects of his bounty, the will should be 
 upheld, has been followed in this Province.* 
 
 We have many definitions of a sound or disposing mind. 
 Some of them may be thus summed up. A man must under- 
 stand that he has a house, or lands, or money, and some . 
 thingaboutit; that he has the power of disposing of these by 
 will, which is an instrument of the law, by which the wishes 
 of testators are given effect to after their death ; ho must 
 know that he has or has not relatives ; he must, if he has 
 relatives, know who they are, and know and remember some 
 of his relations to them, and of their claims upon his memory, 
 affection and bounty.* The mental health may be slightly 
 impaired, the haleness and strength of middle age may be 
 somewhat diminished, and old age may have caused a cer- 
 tain dilapidation of the mental structure ; yet, if the indi- 
 vidual be able to comprehend the business in hand, and 
 the possible objects of his bounty, and retains these in 
 his mind sufficiently to pass a sound and natural judgment 
 on them, he is able to make a will.* The law has not said 
 that no man not in the prime of life shall not make a will ; 
 it has not said no one whose mind has suffered any diminu- 
 tion of strength shall not make a will ; it has not said no 
 
 ■ Emts V. Ernes, ii Chy. 325. 
 
 » Martin v. Martin, 15 Chy. 586. 
 
 ^ Wilson V. Wilson, 22 Chy. 39; Ingoldshy v. Ingoldsby, 20 Chy. 131. 
 
 * Brown on Insanity, 77. 
 
 5 Ibid, 80. 
 
WILLS UNDUE INFLUENCE. 
 
 221 
 
 one wiio entertains wrong-headed notions, capricious whims, 
 and stupid prejudices, and the like, shall not make a will. 
 If he has enough of mind to do this thing rationally and 
 Millingly, he has a sound mind.' 
 
 Although it is said, at times, that it requires the highest 
 degree of capacity to make a will, yet generally, the authori- 
 ties say that it does not require any very great amount of 
 capacity to make a will.' 
 
 It seems now pretty firmly estahlished that insanity or 
 delusion, unconnected with the objects of testamentary dis- 
 position, and which did not actually affect that instrument, 
 will not invalidate it.' It has been held that a man might 
 be insane, and yet possess a disposing mind, and if the 
 delusions, though still existing, had not affected the disposi- 
 tion, then it should stand.* 
 
 Lord Kenyon says, that a man must have that degree of 
 recollection about him that would enable liim to look about 
 the property he had to dispose of, and the persons to whom 
 he wishes to dispose of it." 
 
 Notwithstanding these definitions, there are many cases 
 in which testators appear not to have had the requisites 
 called for by them, and yet the wills propounded have been 
 allowed to stand. As striking examples of such cases, see 
 M<frtiH V. Martin, 12 Gr. 500; 15 Gr. 586; Mmzirs v. 
 White, 9 Chy. 574; Deare v. Elin/n, Ec. & Mar. 342; 
 Thompson v. Torrance, 28 Chj'. 253. 
 
 III. UNDUE INFLUENCE. 
 
 Another great source of litigation in wills is that, although 
 the deceased possessed the mens disponendi, he was not a 
 free agent ; that he was under some undue inlluence, which 
 prevented the disposition of his property from being virtu- 
 
 ta;? 
 
 ;9 
 
 I 
 
 >m 
 
 i 
 
 • Brown on Insanity, S2. 
 ^ Ibid, 247. 
 
 :■ Ibid, 252. 
 
 * Banks V. Goodfcllojv, 5 L. R. O. V>. 549. 
 
 5 Grcenivoud v. Circcmvvod, 3 Curt App. 230. 
 
2-22 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 r 
 
 a*: 
 
 ally Ills own act. The confidential relationships tnat 
 generally give rise to this position, are those of solicitor 
 and client, guardian and ward, confessor and penitent, etc. 
 
 In such cases as the above, where the onus of proving the 
 fairness and propriety of the transaction lies on the party 
 benefitted, the rule, as laid down in the well-known case of 
 Huffuenin v. Basely,^ still correctly presents the law on this 
 point. Where any confidential relationship exists, and the 
 party in whom it is reposed makes use of it to obtain an 
 advantage to himself, at the expense of the party confiding, 
 he shall never be allowed to retain any such advantage, 
 however unimpeachable such transaction would have been 
 if no such relationship had existed. Outside of the relation- 
 ship existing in such cases as the above, there may, of 
 course, be undue influence. 
 
 But all influences are not unlawful. Persuasion, appeals 
 to the affections, or ties of kindred, to a sentiment of grati- 
 tude for past services, or pity for future destitution, or the 
 like ; these are all legitimate, and may be fairly used on a 
 testator. The testator may be led, but not driven, and his 
 will must be the ofl'spring of his own volition, and not the 
 record of that of some one else.* The influence must not, 
 howevtr, amount to a control.* 
 
 If a testator be constrained to make a will by fear, it 
 cannot stand,^ as the fear of death, or of bodily hurt, or 
 imprisonment, or loss of one's goods, or the like; and a 
 will obtained by fraud is no will." 
 
 Unless the influence amounts to a control, so that it 
 could not be said that the will was the will of the person 
 assumed to have made it, this is not sufficient to invali- 
 date it.* 
 
 A will may be procured by interrogation. It need not 
 necessarily originate with the testator ; but the deceased 
 
 
 • 14 Ves. 273. 
 
 = Sefton V. HopU'ood, i F, & F. 578. 
 3 \Vatcr)iouse v. Lee, 10 Chy. 176. 
 « Godolp, pt. 3, C. 25. S. 8. 
 » Boys V. Romborough, 6 H. L. C. 2. 
 
 * HiindUy V. Stacey, i V. & F. 574. 
 
WILLS — OTHER DISABILITIES. 
 
 223 
 
 must completely understand, adopt and sanction the dis- 
 position proposed to him.* He may even l)e unprepared 
 to make a will, and have no intention of doing so. 
 
 But, in such cases, the Court will scrutinize with great 
 care, the alleged disposition, and require convincing proof 
 that, although it he a will by interrogation, it embodies the 
 wishes of the testator, and that he knowingly assented to 
 this paper propounded as his will. 
 
 After these remarks, it w^ill appear at once how unfor- 
 tunate it would be for any relationship to exist between 
 the testator and the person drawing the will, where the 
 latter is to reap any benefit under it. Doctors and clergy- 
 men are frequently called upon to draw wills, where the 
 parties desiring them are in extremis, and what they do as 
 a work of charity and kindness, is not to be harshly dealt 
 with. But it should be remembered that when a man, 
 capable of disposing of his property by w^ill, wishes to do 
 so, the person who undertakes that task is onh* his 
 amanuensis for the time being, and that whether he be 
 only capable of writing the testator's words down, or is the 
 most learned in the law of Her Majesty's Counsel, if the 
 rt'suit does not embody the intention of the deceased, and 
 his intention only, it is not his will. He must be capable 
 of acting, and free to act. The limit of suggestions must 
 be left to the common sense of unprofessional persons 
 whose duty it may be, in extreme cases, to J raw up the trill 
 of a fellow-being — not to impose their own views on ? dying 
 man, and then misname the result his will. 
 
 IV. OTPIEB DISABILITIES. 
 
 A testator may have outlived his understanding, but 
 mere age or weakness of intellect is not sufficient to avoid 
 a will ; but imbecility produced by age or sickness, of which 
 the devisee has taken advantage, will be fatal.- 
 
 The only disability created by statute appears to be that 
 of persons under the age of twenty-one years. 
 
 ' Thompson v. Torrance, 28 Chy. 253. See also Bell v. Lcc, 28 Chy. 130, 
 » 1 Wms. on Ex'ors. 36. 
 
 S2 
 
 '■- IBM 
 
 « 
 
224 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 A married woman is includod in the definition of " per- 
 son" or " testator" in the Revised Statute Ontario, cap. 
 106, but it will be seen that it is doubtful if she has any 
 further power, as to her separate estate, than under the Act 
 of 1859. By it she could make any devise or bequest of 
 her separate propert}' to or among her child or children, 
 issue of any marriage, and failing there being any issue, 
 then to her husband, or as she might see fit, in the same 
 manner as if she were sole and unmarried. The Revised 
 Statute should be amended as to wills since Januar}' 1st, 
 1874, setting the doubt in question at rest. 
 
 A deaf-mute ma}' make a will; but a pers )n deaf, blind 
 and dumb is legally an idiot, and his testament, if made, 
 would be void. Blind persons are not incapable, nor are 
 deafness and dumbness absolute incapabilities.* Intoxi- 
 cation, short of producing oblivion, will not incapacitate — 
 it must disorder the faculties and pervert the judgment.* 
 
 Old age is of itself no incapacity, but if a person becomes 
 a cuild again, through want of understanding, he is inca- 
 pable* ; and extreme old ago raises a doubt of capacity.* 
 
 It is said that traitors and felons, in England, cannot 
 make a will of personal estate ; but a felon may dispose, 
 by will, of real estate, where there is no attainder.' No 
 case seems to have arisen in this Province. 
 
 
 
 V. THE WILLS ACT OF ONTARIO. 
 
 The Revised Statute, cap. 106, of Ontario, contains the 
 statutory enactments relating to wills of real and personal 
 property. 
 
 The word Will is extended to a testament and to a codicil, 
 and to an appointment by will, or by writing in the nature 
 of a will in exercise of a power, and also to a disposition by 
 
 • See cases on these classes of disability, Walkem on Wills, page 49. 
 » Peck V. Carey, 29 N. Y. R. 9. 
 
 3 I Wms. on Ex'ors. 37. 
 
 4 Kindleside v. Harrison, 2 Phill. 461, 462. 
 
 5 Jarman on Wills, 38. 
 
WILLS — THE WILLS ACT OF ONTARIO. 
 
 '225 
 
 [cil, 
 lure 
 
 v;ill and testament, or devise of the custody and tuition of 
 any child under 12, Car. II., cap. 24, and to any other tes- 
 tamentary disposition.' 
 
 Parties capable of making a will include married women'; 
 but it is doubtful, under the decisions, if she can devise her 
 property away from her own children.* 
 
 No will made by any person under the age of twenty-one 
 years shall be valid*; but, any soldier being in actual 
 military service, or any mariner or seaman being at sea, 
 may dispose of his personal estate as he might have done 
 before the passing of the Act." 
 
 The disposing power of a person capable of making a 
 will, extends to all real estate and personal estate which he 
 may be entitled to, either at law or in equity, at the time of 
 his death, and which, if not so devised, bequeathed, or 
 disposed of, would devolve upon his heir-at-law ; and this 
 power extends to esiates jfoiir autre vie, and to all contingent 
 executory or future interests in real or personal estate, and 
 to all rights of entry for conditions broken, and other rights 
 of entry ; and, finally, to all other real and personal estate 
 as he may be entitled to at the time of his death, notwith- 
 standing that he may become entitled to the same subse- 
 quently to the execution of his will." 
 
 Every will is construed to speak and take effect immedi- 
 ately before the death of the testator, unless a contrary 
 intention appears by the will.' 
 
 A dividing line must be drawn at the 1st of January, 
 1874, as to wills executed before and since that date, and, 
 for some purposes, also on the 1st of January, 1869. Every 
 will re-executed or re-published, or revived by any codicil 
 
 . ' R. S. O., cap. io6, sec. g, sub-sec. i. 
 « Ibid, sub-sec. 4. 
 ' Munro v Stuart, 4 Ont. App. 449. 
 
 * R. S. 0.,cap. 106, sec. 11. 
 
 5 Ibid, sec. 14. These persons may make a valid will without its provi- 
 sions being reduced into writing. A declaration in the presence of three 
 witnesses is all that is necessary ; and if the declaration is taken down in 
 writing, it should be in the precise words of the testator. 
 
 * R. S. O., cap. 106, sec. to. 
 ' Ibid, cap. 26. 
 
 o's.c. 16 
 
 S2 
 
 CD 
 
 
 'J 
 
 i 
 
226 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVFA'ANCINQ. 
 
 executed since the 1st of January, 1874, is governed by the 
 present law, and is deemed to be made at the time at which 
 the same was so re-executed, repubhshed, or revived/ 
 
 Very minute particulars are given as to execution, attes- 
 tation, signatm'e and witnessing of wills ; and also as to 
 revocation, obliteration, etc. ; and the Act defines the 
 meanixig of "real estate," "personal estate," "person," 
 " testator," and " mortgage," and the import of some other 
 phrases in use in testamentary dispositions, to which 
 reference will be made hereafter. 
 
 VI. INSTRUCTIONS FOR DRAWING A WILL. 
 
 When one is satisfied that the proposed testator has a 
 mind sufficiently capable to dispose of his property, and, 
 further, that he is free to act as he chooses, then the im- 
 mediate task of conveying his wishes to paper in a legal way 
 is commenced. In this regard the instructions of a learned 
 writer in England will be found to be in point.' 
 
 " On being instructed to make a will, you should take 
 down in writing full particulars respecting the testator's 
 property, whether in possession, reversion, remainder or 
 expectancy, and also the particulars of his family. After 
 doing this, insert opposite each description of property the 
 name and any necessary identification of the person to 
 whom the testator intends to devise or bequeath it; and this 
 should be continued until the whole property is disposed of." 
 
 Beyond this, and, indeed, first of all, enquiry sb'^uld be 
 made to see if the party is of sufficient age to make a will, 
 in case, from appearances, the person may seem to be 
 under twenty-one years of age — then an enquiry as to 
 former wills, if any — as to whether or not the testator is a 
 trustee, or has any power of appointment yet to be executed 
 — what persons he proposes to appoint as executors and 
 trustees to his will — what provision he has to make for his 
 wife, in case he be married ; and, lastly, in the event of his 
 
 R. S. O. cap. io6, sec. 7. 
 Greenwood Con. Chap. Wills. 
 
WILLS — INSTRUCTIONS FOR DRAWING A WILL. 
 
 227 
 
 by the 
 
 which 
 
 1 
 
 • 
 
 attes- 
 ) as to 
 es the 
 jrson," 
 e other 
 
 which 
 
 .L. 
 
 )r has a 
 ky, and, 
 the im- 
 jgal way 
 learned 
 
 lid take 
 ^stator's 
 inder or 
 After 
 erty the 
 erson to 
 and this 
 Dsedof." 
 >^uld be 
 :e a will, 
 to be 
 as to 
 ator is a 
 executed 
 lors and 
 e for his 
 at of his 
 
 
 coming into the possession of property from the wills of any 
 relatives, to whom is he to leave property as his residuary 
 legatee or devisee. 
 
 In the event of the testator being the father of infant 
 children, the suggestion may be made of his power of 
 appointing a guardian for them, explaining to him that, in 
 the absence of his appointment, their mother is their 
 natural guardian, but that the Surrogate Court or the High 
 Court of Justice may, for sufficient cause, remove the 
 j^uardians and appoint others in their stead. 
 
 But it will be necessary to examine the foregoing more 
 in detail. 
 
 The requirements extracted from Mr. Greenwood's book 
 are the least of their kind that must be obtained. The 
 testator's real estate may be encumbered or leased, and he 
 may have a large amount of personal property, and he is 
 likely to have debts. Suppose that farm Whiteacre is be- 
 queathed to the testator's son, John. Whiteacre may be 
 heavily mortgaged, and John may die before the testator. 
 If the personal property is to pay oif the mortgage, it must 
 be so willed, otherwise John will take his bequest cam onere. 
 Suppose John die under age and without issue, what is to 
 become of the devise ? must be answered by the testator. 
 Again, if a bequest be left the wife or a daughter, it will be 
 frequently found that, what is set down as an estate in fee, 
 will, in certain contingencies, be pruned down to an estate 
 for life in their regard. After explaining to the testator 
 that, if his daughter die under age and without issue, there 
 will (in the absence of a residuary clause) be an intestacy 
 as to her bequest, unless some farther provision is made in 
 that event, then a clause will be added providing for the 
 testator's wishes. The advantages of a residuary clause 
 are apparent from this, and no will should be without one. 
 A bequest may be followed in a will, making provision for 
 two or more contingencies ; but, in real life, the beneficiaries 
 may be all dead, childless and intestate, before their ex- 
 pected estate vested in any one of them. 
 
 Though almost every will contains a clause revoking all 
 former wills, yet, without this, two wills, if not inconsistent. 
 
 KM 
 
 ■ •"-1 
 ■jt 
 
■■*1 
 
 228 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCl^'O. 
 
 m 
 
 M 
 
 I 
 
 
 may be read together — the hitter as supplementing thf 
 former or prior ones, and, in a possible case, the testator 
 may not wish to disturb the provisions of a former will. 
 Wills are often deposited in the llegistry Ofltice for safe 
 keeping, and a supplementary one may be only a sort of 
 codicil, and to be so treated. 
 
 As to the age of a testator, the statute is express that 
 no one under the age of twenty-one years can make a will,' 
 
 If it be likely that the testator is a trustee, it can do no 
 harm to insert a devise of trust estates, as it will save great 
 trouble and expense if it should be found requisite*; and if, 
 under any former will, he had any powers of appointment 
 by will, then the will in question should be looked into, so- 
 that the mode of appointment could be strictly followed. 
 
 In the selection of executors, the testator should be 
 guided, not so much by his friendship with the persons he 
 names, as by the fact that they have sound common sense, 
 and have some business capacity. To be an executor is to 
 assume a troublesome, and often a thankless task ; and, if 
 the boon of renunciation were not open to the public, it 
 would be difficult, in some cases, to suggest a more refined 
 species of courteous cruelty than to name one's enemy as an 
 executor. What often happens, is to name two or more 
 who do not wish to act with each other, but who would act 
 with more agreeable representatives. It is not an easy task 
 to select, and the testator should know that it is worth his 
 while, and will be of advantage to his estate, to have 
 competent persons take charge of it. 
 
 An executor, as such, has nothing to do with the real 
 estate of his testator ; and if he is invested with the power 
 of selling, or otherwise disposing of it, he assumes the 
 higher character and more responsible functionf^. of a 
 trustee. 
 
 Now, it will be easily seen that the qualifications neces- 
 sary to fill this office are the most trustworthy that can be 
 had. To collect what is owing to the testator, to pay his 
 
 ■ See post, as to Nuncupative Wills. 
 ' Greenwood Con. Chap. Wills. 
 
WILLS INSTRUCTIONS FOR DRAWING A WILL. 
 
 229 
 
 ig tlu- 
 stator 
 r will. 
 r safe 
 ;ort of 
 
 s tliat 
 I will.' 
 
 do no 
 
 e great 
 and if, 
 itment 
 nto, SO' 
 wed. 
 
 mid be 
 ions he 
 I sense, 
 or is to 
 and, if 
 iiLlic, it 
 refined 
 ly as an 
 r more 
 mid act 
 isy task 
 )rth his 
 have 
 
 the real 
 e power 
 nes the 
 of a 
 
 3 neces- 
 i can be 
 pay his 
 
 ^lebts, and distribute the balance of his personal estate 
 iiniongst those entitled, are the main duties of an executor. 
 A trustee may, if he be executor as well, as is usual, have 
 fill this to do, and, in addition, husband the entire real 
 estate as well, and so his qualifications should be such as 
 to lit him for these duties. 
 
 Seldom more than two trustees or executors can be got to 
 act, and it is not desirable to aj^point a number, who only 
 make expense by their renunciation. 
 
 Trustees are unnecessary, except where real or personal 
 estate is to be sold and invested, or where the wife or chil- 
 dren are to be maintained out of the proceeds. 
 
 The executors and trustees should, except in very large 
 estates, be the same persons. The duties of an executor will 
 ordinarily cease at a little over a year from the death of the 
 testator, when he shall have collected in his testator's 
 estate, paid the debts and the legacies. If, beyond this, 
 annual sums are paid into his hands, in trust for persons 
 under the will, and if he shall be called upon to sell lands 
 and stock, and hold them to the use of other parties, he 
 will be fullilling the office of trustee, but these will, in no 
 way, conflict with his previous duties as executor. 
 
 As to when trustees take the legal estate, see Prideaux 
 on Conveyancing, Otli edition, p. 371. 
 
 Where the testator or testatrix is married, a difficulty 
 always presents itself in providing definitely for the sur- 
 viving wife or husband. If the husband leave his wife a 
 bequest without more, she will be entitled to it as well as 
 to her claim for dower ; and upon the face of the will, the 
 ilevir^e or bequest must be inconsistent with her claim to 
 dower, in order to put her to her election. 
 
 Where, in general, a testator says that he wishes his 
 property to go to his wife, he does not in the sense of it-» 
 changing the course of its descent. 
 
 Where there are children, it will most frequently be 
 found that she is to get it for her life, and after her death, 
 to the children, and failing children, to the brothers and 
 sisters of the testator. As soon as a husband is made 
 
 KX3 
 
 CD 
 
 ? 
 
 9 
 
 »' 
 
230 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 
 
 aware that an absolute devise of all his i^roperty to his 
 wife not only gives it to his wife but to herheira, in certain 
 contingencies, then he frequently gives her a life estate, 
 keeping the course of descent in his own family. And so, 
 correspondingly, in the case of the wife. This would be 
 the simplest form of will, where there are no children ; but 
 either party may wish to give a share only to the other, 
 and if so, it must be considered whether it is to be given in 
 lieu, or in addition to her or his right as dowress or tenant 
 by the courtesy. The survivor is not bound to accept, under 
 the will, such share, but may have recourse to what the 
 law allows, if he or she thinks this would be more advan- 
 tageous. They must either accept under the will, and any 
 legally imposed restrictions therein, or disregard the will 
 altogether. It is always well to counsel the testator or 
 testatrix to exceed, if anything, the legal shares of his or 
 her survivor. The liberality may repay itself. 
 
 The share of the children comes next in point of import- 
 ance. In order to prevent any lapscn, a devise or bequest 
 to any child should, in the event of his death, be made to 
 some one over ; though a legacy to a testator's child, or 
 other issue, does not lapse by his death, if he has had 
 any issue at the testator's death ; but the legacy takes 
 effect as if he had died immediately after the death of the 
 testator. 
 
 A testator may not know the extent of his disposing 
 power. The test is what real and personal property will 
 his heirs, executors or administrators be entitled to at law 
 or in equity, at his death. This will include everything 
 except estates held in joint-tenancy, or an estate tail, or an 
 estate in quasi tail (that is an estate j^our autre vie given 
 to a man and the heirs of his body), none of which descend 
 to the testator's heir, executor or administrator.' Of course, 
 life estates, that are for the life of the testator, do not pass — 
 they cease at his death. 
 
 A married woman, however, cannot, it seems, under the 
 law, as explained by the decisions, devise or bequeath hei 
 
 " Deane Con. 411. 
 
WILLS — INSTRUCTIONS FOR DRAWING A WILL. 
 
 231 
 
 I 
 
 property to one of several children, to the exclusion of the 
 others.* 
 
 If the testator feels charitably disposed, he should be 
 warned against leaving any real estate, or personalty sav- 
 oring of the realty, to corporations coming within the scope 
 of the Mortmain Acts, which are in force in this Province. 
 It is not impossible, as we have seen, to make a valid deed 
 of lands to such a corporation, when the terms of the Act 
 can be complied with ; but it is not easy to comply with 
 these terms. Pure personalty can be devised to any reli- 
 gious corporation without any additional formality beyond 
 such conveying words as would hold good in the casu of 
 any ordinary legatee. 
 
 Every devise of land to a corporation is void, unless such 
 corporation is authorized to hold land in Mortmain by 
 license from the Crown or Act of Parliament.' Under 
 the provisions of !) George II., cap. 36, every testa- 
 mentary disposition of land for a charitable use is void.* 
 The reader must not forget how wide a signification is 
 given to the word charitable in these cases ; if, therefore, 
 the testator desires to benefit such corporation or bodies, it 
 should be seen that the bequest is made expressly out of his 
 pure personalty ; and the realty, and personalty savoring 
 of the realty, be reserved for the purposes to which it may 
 lawfully be applied. 
 
 Two sorts of gifts the conveyancer should guard the 
 testator against. One is those of a class that tend to create 
 a perpetuity, as where an estate is given to a man's son, 
 but not to be sold out of the family — to be kept in the name. 
 
 This tends to depreciate the value of the property, whilst 
 perpetuating the name of the donor ; but they frequently 
 defeat themselves. Prohibitory clauses, if carried too far, 
 are struck out by the Courts. 
 
 The other class is where gifts are given to the wife or 
 relations of the testator, with obnoxious conditions. It is 
 
 r,X3 
 
 9 
 
 » Munro v. Smart, 26 Chy. 31, and 4 Ont. App. 449. 
 
 = Jarm. on Wills, 58. 
 
 J Paice V. The Archbishop of Canterbury, 14 Ves. 364. 
 
232 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 ? 
 
 fe^ 'it 
 
 ,. * 
 
 natural, perhaps, that a testator may not like to be lil)era! 
 to his wife's second husband ; but to cut off a daughter or 
 son because they happen to offend some guardian's taste 
 in the choice of a partner for life, does not receive very 
 courteous judicial treatment. Side by side with objection- 
 able provisions, it is usual to wish inserted a clause, pro- 
 hibiting any party, claiming under the will, from disputing 
 it' ; but the most ingenious of clauses fails at times, and it has 
 happened that such a prohibition, though valid, as against 
 a daughter," did not avail as against her trustee." It is just 
 possible that a perfect prohibitory clause may be made.* 
 
 A direction in a devise in fee simple, that the devisee 
 " should not sell or cause to be sold the above-named lot or 
 any part thereof, during her natural life, but that she shall 
 be at liberty to grant it to any of her children, whoever she 
 shall think proper," is a valid restraint upon alienation* ; 
 but the devisee may mortgage it. 
 
 Although this case is an instance of the difficulty that 
 exists in construing these conditions, and of the particu- 
 larity to be employed in expressing exactly what is needed, 
 in Smith v. Fanr/ltt, it may well l)e questioned whether the 
 paper propounded was a will at all or not. 
 
 A devise to sons, with a direction that they must not 
 sell or transfer the said property, without the written con- 
 sent of the testator's wife during her life, held a valid 
 restriction on alienation." 
 
 If several good and bad conditions are coupled together 
 they are all bad.' 
 
 As conditions attached to devises and beques' 
 quent difficulty in taking instructions for a will, t'oiio\> 
 ing reference to the cases on the subject may be found of use. 
 
 ' A provision of this kind is valid, and is not contrary to public policy ; 
 Evanturcl v. Evaiitnrcl, 6 L. R. P. C. i. 
 
 = Cook V. Turner, fS AI. & W. 727. 
 
 3 Cook V. Turner, 19 L. J, N. S.. Chy. Si. 
 
 * Greenwood, 408. 
 
 5 Smith V. Faui^ht, 45 O. I). 484. 
 
 ' Earls V. MeAlpine. 6 On. App. 145. 
 
 7 Re Babcock, y Chy. 427. 
 
WILLS — INSTRUCTIONS FOIl DR.VWINO A WILL. 
 
 233 
 
 It is laid down, fjonomlly.tliat conditions rcpn;j;nanttotht' 
 nature of the estate to whicli tiioy arc annexed, are abso- 
 lutely void. And so land ^iven in fee to bo let by the 
 devisee at a definite rent, or to cultivate in a certain 
 manner, will be unfettered by such restrictions' ; but a 
 direction that the rents of existin«^ tenants should not l)e 
 raised, or that certain persons should be allowed to continue 
 in possession, are merely exceptions or reservations. It is 
 also useless to make a clause that the wife should not be en- 
 dowed, or the husband a tenant by courtesy' ; or that the 
 'levisee should not alien' ; but the devisee tnay be restrained 
 from aliening to any particular person, or by any particular 
 mode of assurance,^ or in Mortmain.* A restriction to alien 
 to none but A. is void* ; but a provision, never to sell out of 
 the family, has been upheld, though the devisee could 
 never make a good title to a purchaser who was a stranger 
 in the family" ; and where a testator died, in 1851, giving 
 lands to his two sons, " but not to be assigned to any per- 
 son, except a son of his, for the term of twenty years, from 
 the day of his decease," this was held to be good.* 
 
 A condition requiring alienation within a given time 
 is bad^ ; and all restraints and alienation must be limited 
 to a certain period, and if this is too remote, the restraint is 
 bad also.^" Whore a testator devised property to his throe 
 sons, in fee simple and in joint tenancy, and stating 
 tliat they *' shouUl not bo at liberty to sell any part of 
 my homestead farm, herein willed, except to each other, 
 and so descend to their heirs, to the third generation," 
 this restraint was held to be void." 
 
 ' Attorney -General v. Hall, Jac, 395. 
 
 ' Partinirton's Case, 10 Kep. 36. 
 
 ^ Co. Lift. 206 r.. 
 
 •• Ware V. Canii, 10 13. Jv: C. 433, 
 
 Co. Lift. 233. 
 
 ' Attwater v. Attivater. 18 Beav. 330, and sou judg:iu.:it of Sir Ci. Jcisel, 
 K., in re Mackay, L. R. 20 Eq. 129. 
 
 •' Re Macleny, 20 L. R. Eq. 186. 
 
 ' Pennyman v. McCru:rau, 18 U, C. C. I'. 132, 
 
 « Slta7i' V. Bird, 7 Chy. D. Cig. 
 
 '" Larges' Case, 2 Leon. 82. 
 
 ■> GallUiger v. Farlinger. I'. C. C. P. 512. 
 
 •"'••Mr 
 
 ■"1 
 
 •^11 
 
 9 
 
234 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 In regard to personalty, it is a good restraint to prohibit 
 its alienation before it falls into possession, but after it 
 falls into possession, there may be a gift over, if it has not 
 been disposed of.' Chattel property cannot be given so 
 as to be free from the creditors of the beneficiary.* 
 
 A condition requiring residence at a particular place is 
 void* ; but it has been held, in England, to be a good con- 
 dition to require the legatee to live there* ; and the resi- 
 dence of a legatee at the mansion house is not binding 
 during minority, and is generally inapplicable to an infant 
 person."* A bequest to A., in case he remain a steady 
 boy, and live in some respectable family till twenty-one 
 years of age, was held broken, where the beneficiary left the 
 Province and enlisted in the United States army.* 
 
 Conditions in restraint of marriage are very general. 
 
 It is a good conditiv.n that the widow or widower should 
 not marry,' or should not marry a particular person, or of 
 objectionable religion, nationality or pge ; or of a particular 
 profession, or under a stated income.* A condition that the 
 minor must not marry without the consent of his parents 
 or guardians, is perfectly reasonable and proper, and the 
 consent must be a free consent' ; and so may be good,'* 
 where the object is not to restrain a certain person from 
 marrying, but to provide for her support while unmarried. 
 A condition reducing shares, in case of a marriage, is void, 
 as is also a condition subsequent in restraint of marriage." 
 
 The father is the natural guardian of his children, and at 
 his death the guardiansiiip passes to the mother, in the 
 
 ' Bradley v. Pcixoto, 3 Ves. 324. 
 
 ^ Barber v. Davis, 12 U. C. C. P. 344 ; re yones, 23 L. T. 211 ; BratuioH 
 V. Robinson, 18 Ves. 429. 
 
 1 Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, 12 L. R. Eq. 304. 
 
 * Ross V. lies, 20 W. R. 858. 
 
 5 Perry v. Roberts, 25 L. T. 371. 
 
 (' Pew V. Lafferty, iG Chy. 408. 
 
 7 Barton v. Barton, 2 Vern. 308 ; Allen v. jfackson, i Chy. D. 399, 
 
 " See cases in J arm. on Wills. 
 
 9 In re Stephenson, 18 W. R. 10G6 V. C. B. 
 
 » yones V. yones, i (j. B. D. 279. 
 
 " Bi'llairs v. Bellairs, iS Eq. 510. 
 
WILLS — INSTRUCTIONS FOR DRAWING A WILL. 
 
 235 
 
 event of his making no appointment. The appointment, if 
 made in a will, is valid, of course, where the will is validly 
 executed ; and it would seem that such an appointment has 
 no binding force, except as enforced by the conditions 
 attached to the dispositions of property.' 
 
 Mr. Walkem cites authorities to shew that an instrument 
 executed as a will, but which contained only an appoint- 
 ment of guardians to the testator's children, was not 
 entitled to probate.* In the last edition of Prideaux (1879), 
 the case of re Morton is treated as an authority for the 
 position taken, that a will, merely appointing a guardian, 
 need not be proved.* 
 
 The advantage of a residuary clause has been referred to 
 before, and should not be overlooked. Circumstances may 
 frequently arise so as to render inoperative any specified devise 
 or bequest. The beneficiary may not be in existence when 
 the bequest falls due, or he may be incapable of taking. 
 Sometimes a beneficiary under a will is unfortunate 
 enough to be a witness, or the husband or wife of a bene- 
 ficiary may have acted as such. In such cases, unless there 
 is a residuary devisee or legatee capable of taking all such 
 portions of the testator's property as have not been disposed 
 of, there is an intestacy as to the particular gift. No mat- 
 ter how small such gift may be, the distribution of it is 
 always a matter of difticulty, and, where infants are con- 
 cerned, generally a matter of resort to the court for admin- 
 istration. An eft'ective residuary clause is a sure depository 
 against an intestacy. 
 
 Another reason for such a clause is that the testator may 
 be the recipient of a legacy or bequest from some unkncnvn 
 or unexpected quarter, or become entitled to property 
 through the intestacy of some relative. If no provision be 
 made for this in his own will, there is an intestacy as to that 
 amount. 
 
 "11 
 
 ' I Redf, on Wills, 4 n. 2. 
 
 » Walkem on Wills, page 13; re Morton, 3 S. & T. 422; Gilliatw 
 (iilliat, 2 Phill. 222, Lady Chester's case, i Ventr, 207. 
 
 * Prideaux on Con. 420. 
 
236 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 Even where there was no such place as the one described 
 in the will, it can be shewn where the property is situate,' 
 and a farm described as one lot may be construed to mean 
 that and another.* On the other hand, where the provisions 
 of the will would tend to shew an equal division of the pro- 
 perty, a particular word may be restricted to mean less 
 than may be supposed.* In personal property there is more 
 frequently an intestacy than in real estate. Land being 
 the same everywhere — except where the uses to which it is 
 put are described in some cases, and not in others — the 
 general term only is used ; but with chattels the case is 
 different. A bequest of specific chattels, and " whatever 
 else I may have at my house," was held not to pass mort- 
 gages, and a bank receipt there*; and subsequent bequests 
 may restrict a prior general devise.* 
 
 11 
 
 V 
 
 g ^ a. 
 1^ 
 
 VII. FOEM, ETC., OF THE INSTIIUMENT. 
 
 With the foregoing as instructions, the solicitor prepares 
 the draft will in his own office — that is unless, as often 
 happens, he is obliged to draw it up and have it signed and 
 witnessed on a first visit, when his client is not expected to 
 outlive a second one. 
 
 A will may be written on any material and in any mode'; 
 but it is better to write it on vellum, parchment or paper," 
 and with ink of one colour, and in the same handwriting 
 throughout.' If a will be partly in ink and partly in pencil, 
 the words in pencil may be rejected if the will is sensible 
 without theni." But the will may consist, in part, of a 
 printed form filled up with writing, or may even be in num- 
 
 ■ Xicholson V. Biirklioldt'y, 21 Q. B. loS. 
 
 2 Smith V. lionstcad, 13 Chy. 29. 
 
 1 Bi<;elo7i< v. Bigeloiv, ig Chy, 549. 
 
 ♦ Smith V. Knight, 18 Chy. 41)2. 
 
 ' Davidson v. Boomer, 15 Chy. i. 
 
 *• Deane on Wills, p. 73. 
 
 ~ Shef>. Touch, 54. 
 
 ''■ Rt! Biuvn, 3 No Cas. 643. 
 
 •s Rf Adams, L. R. 2 W & M. 307. 
 
WILLS — for:^i, etc., of the instrument. 
 
 •237 
 
 bers and letters/ explained by a key ; bat the first-mentioned 
 form of will may give rise to difiiculties in probate, and the 
 disadvantages of the second are obvious." 
 
 The form of the instrument is not important, so long as 
 its terms are testamentary''; but, if the instrument is in 
 the form of a deed, the circumstance of the grantor 
 receiving a life interest to himself, with a general power of 
 revocation, does not make it testamentary." 
 
 The form of a will is not material, as deeds, poll and 
 indentures, deeds of gift, bonds, marriage settlements, 
 letters, drafts, assignments, receipts, notes, orders, and 
 even a power of attorney, have been held to be papers tes- 
 tamentary'^; and, in one rather extraordinary case, re 
 Coidthard* a paper, described as a codicil, was admitted to 
 probate, though no trace of the will could be found ; and an 
 instrument may operate parti}' as a deed and partly as a 
 will.' A will may consist of several distinct papers, to be 
 construed as one testamentary disposition"; and two per- 
 sons jointly may make a will,* and it is irrevocable after 
 one of them dies.'" 
 
 There is no statutory form for a will — as for deeds — nor, 
 indeed, a recognized form in geno al use amongst convey- 
 ancers as to the simplest dispositions. The result has 
 been, that any intelligible form of words capable of expres- 
 eing the testator's intentions will hold good if committed 
 to writing and signed in the presence of two attesting wit- 
 nesses. Letters have frequently been admitted to probate, 
 and a deed — a document so unlike a will — has been ad- 
 mitted also, thus reversing the common saying, of taking 
 the will for the deed, if that be a fair use of the latter word. 
 
 ' East V. Troyford, 4 H. L. C. 517. 
 = Deane on Conveyancing, 404. 
 "1 Piideaux Con. 354. 
 * Thompson v. Bruwitc, 3 M. & R. 32. 
 5 See cases in Walkem on Wills, lOo. 
 ' II Jur. N.S. 184. 
 ? Re NC7CUS, 7 Jur. 688. 
 ' See cases in Walkem on Wills, 167. 
 '> Re Stnieey, i Jur. N. S. 1177. 
 '» See cases in Walkem on Wills, 170. 
 
 
 
 9 
 
 n 
 
238 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 I 
 
 £ 
 
 •a" 
 
 
 The following has been held to be a will sufficient to pass 
 the fee : 
 
 " I make and give all my property, both land, house, and 
 all the stock, and every other article I possess or own, to 
 my loving wife, Elizabeth, making her my executrix/" 
 
 If a man be in danger of immediate death, and should 
 write on a slip of paper with a pencil as follows : 
 
 " I give all my property to my wife " — and sign his name 
 
 at the end of it in the presence of two witnesses, who signed 
 
 their names therein as witnesses at the same time, so that 
 
 it would read : 
 
 I give all my property to my wife. 
 
 John Jones. 
 John Doe. 
 
 EicHARD Doe. 
 
 there is no doubt but that this would be a valid and effec- 
 tual will, under which the wife, or any creditor, could take 
 out probate, pay John Jones' debts, and the wife claim the 
 balance. For, in the first place, the intention which 
 governs in wills, is manifest that the wife is to get her hus- 
 band's proijerty ; and in the next place, the words, " all my 
 property" (or, indeed, " m} property"), will convey every- 
 thing that the husband will die entitled to — land, mort- 
 gages, chattels, money, stock, etc.; and the word " give" is 
 sufficient to transfer whatever estate or interest the tes- 
 tator may have in the property mentioned. 
 
 It is not necessary for him to say, I, John Jones — it is the 
 same as if he said, I, John Jones, give all my property to my 
 wife — no more than it is necessary to connect and trace a 
 noun to its representative pronoun. Nor need he say that 
 it is his last will, in so many words, because, if he die, 
 without making another, it is, of course, his last will ; and 
 the fact that he wishes two persons to witness and attest 
 it, is evidence that it is his tvill. Nor, again, need he 
 mention what his wife's name is, as he can only have one 
 wife ; and even if the law was more lenient in this respect, 
 the witnesses may be able to prove by extrinsic evidence 
 
 • Hicks V. Snider, 44 Q. B. 486, 
 
"WILLS — FORM, ETC., OF THE INSTRUMENT. 
 
 239 
 
 opass 
 
 ie, and 
 
 iwn, to 
 1" 
 
 should 
 
 s name 
 I signed 
 30 that 
 
 BS. 
 
 id effec- 
 ild take 
 aim the 
 L which 
 ler hus- 
 ' all my 
 every- 
 l, mort- 
 give" is 
 the tes- 
 
 -it is the 
 y to my 
 trace a 
 ay that 
 he die, 
 ill ; and 
 id attest 
 need he 
 lave one 
 respect, 
 evidence 
 
 which one was meant — just as the Courts would find out 
 his intention if he left it to his niece Sarah, and that he 
 had two nieces of that name. And the name and place are 
 not essential, as the witnesses can prove that when it becomes 
 necessary ; and as no form of attestation at all is neces- 
 sary,^ the witnesses can prove that they regard the paper 
 as and for a will, at the request of the testntor. But the 
 witnesses must sign the paper, while the man is alive, and 
 all three must be present at the same time, because, if the 
 testator sign the paper, and one witness omit to sign it, at 
 the time, he can't come back in half an hour, when the 
 testator is dead, and hope to affix his name as a valid wit- 
 ness." All the formalities of the Act must be complied 
 with* ; the writing may be , in any language, and written 
 with a pencil, if needs be. It need say nothing as to any 
 former wills. This last will governs. 
 
 This trifling bit of paj^er, so executed, will, when 
 admitted to probate, transmit to the wife a title to lands, 
 goods, money, stock, etc., as potently, and often more so, 
 than deeds of grant, assignments of mortgages, and other 
 transfers, duly signed, sealed and delivered, with exuberant 
 formalit3\ The creditors must be paid, whether the will 
 makes mention of them or not ; and, indeed, it is useless to 
 insert it in many cases, and apart from the practice of the 
 Surrogate Courts, which could name the wife, in this case, 
 " executrix by the tenor of the will," the well known prin- 
 ciple of law, that the Court will never be at a loss for a 
 trustee, can be successfully invoked to supply the omission. 
 
 The reader may think that when so simple a document 
 would answer so much, why should an elaborate and 
 extensive document be drawn up in so simple a case ; but 
 it will not be needlessly long with some necessary 
 additions. 
 
 In the first place, a date, and the name of the place, are 
 convenient, and should not be omitted ; and, in the second, 
 
 ' Re Thomas, 7 W. R. 270 ; Bryan v. IVhyte, 2 Rob, 315. 
 ' Unreported case of the Writer's. 
 3 Re Draper, 3 N. R. 215. 
 
 ^.10 
 
 IS 
 
 ""I 
 
 "11 
 
240 
 
 PRACTICAIi CONVEYANCING. 
 
 though an attestation clause is not necessary, that this 
 obviates the necessity of any form at all, not merely any 
 particular form,' still it is desirable to add such a clause to 
 a will, since, without it, probate will not be granted unless 
 evidence is given, if obtainable, that all the formalities 
 required by the Act have been complied with." A suggested 
 attestation clause is given with the precedents. 
 
 Some of the other disadvantages in a will of this kind 
 have been referred to before. It is desirable to have an 
 executor, and have provision made, in case the legatee or 
 devisee die before the estate vests. In the event of a 
 simple will giving all the property to husband or wife, the 
 course of descent is entirely changed, as where there is no 
 issue alive ofter their mother or father inherits thereunder. 
 
 Where a gift or legacy is followed by a gift over t>n the 
 death of tlie legatee, the qnestioti often arises whether the 
 death referred to is a death at any time, or a death within 
 a particular period. Where it is a gift to A., and, if ho 
 shall die, to B., the contingenr^y is the death of A, in the 
 testators life ; where it is a gift to A., and if he shall die, 
 without children, the death is at any time ; where the gitt 
 is to X., for life, with remainder to A., and, if A. shall die, 
 to B., the contingenc}'' is tiie death before X. ; and, lastly, 
 a gift to X., for life, with remainder to A., and, if he shall 
 <lie v.^ithout children, to B., means, as decided in the House 
 ot Lords, the death at any tin^e, as in the case above.' 
 
 The frequency of this question being raised should, how- 
 ever, make the conveyancer very careful in explaining- 
 most distinctly the date, and period, and event on or from 
 which the gift over is to take effect. 
 
 If the testator have real estate any place out of Ontario 
 then, the requirements of the law where it is situate, the 
 lex loci 7'ei sitae, must be followed ; but no matter where his 
 personal estate is, the will must be executed with the 
 
 ' Re Thomas, 7 W. R. 270; Bryan v. Whytc, 2 Rob, 315. 
 
 « Re Draper, 3 N. R. 215. 
 
 3 Eihcards v. Edwanh, 15 Beav. 357 ; Mahouey v. Burdelt, L. R. 7 H. 
 L. 388. See Prideaux Con. p. 3S4, gth edition. 
 
WILLS — EXECUTION. 
 
 241 
 
 formalities of the testator's domicile' ; and the personal 
 estate is distributed according to the law of the domicile.'' 
 In this latter respect, it is the law of the domicile of the 
 testator at his death that prevails, and not of that 
 domicile where he resided when he made his will.* 
 
 VIII. EXECUTION. 
 
 of a 
 
 how- 
 ainin<:: 
 Ir from 
 
 Intano, 
 ite, the 
 jere his 
 1th the 
 
 R. 7H. 
 
 After ererything has been inserted in the draft will that 
 the testator desires, and after reading it over for him, and 
 suggesting anything for attention, a fair copy is made of 
 it, where possible, and you attend him again to have tlie 
 will executed. If you leave it with him for execution, he 
 must be instructed on a good many points. The words of 
 the Statute are, that the will shall be signed at the foot or 
 end thereof, by the testator, or by some other person, in 
 his presence, and by his direction.* 
 
 It is well to write out, in pencil, where he is to sign his 
 name, and to draw lines on the left hand side of the last 
 sheet of the will where there is writing, to indicate where 
 the witnesses are to sign. This may seem elementary, but 
 the result of not doing so may be to have the names of 
 the witnesses and the testator mixed np, so that it would 
 be difficult to say which was the testator's signature. The 
 witness may sign his name, and write opposite ir. " execu- 
 tor," instead of witness, but this will make no difference.* 
 
 Then caution him that no person named in the will should 
 be a witness, for though an executor" or trustee may be a 
 good witness, still, all the writers recommend that he 
 should not. Some day a question will arise, if it has not 
 already arieen, whether an executor or trustee, entitled to 
 compensation, may not forfeit his right thereto by signing 
 
 » Prideaux Con. 358. 
 
 - Prideaux Con, 416. 
 
 f Bremer v. Freeman, 10 Moo. P. C 306; Whicker v. Hume, 7 H. L. 
 Cas. 124. 
 
 * R. S. O. cap. 106, sec, 12. 
 
 5 Griffiths V. Griffiths, L. R. 2 P. & M. 300. 
 
 *■ R. S. O. cap. 106, sec. 19. 
 
 o's.c. 16 
 
 i 
 
 '■"1 
 ■■«l 
 
•242 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVKYANCING . 
 
 t 
 
 c 
 
 c: 
 
 !3 
 
 so 
 
 as witness. But a creditor, or tiie wife or husband of anj 
 creditor, whose debt is cliarged on the real or personal 
 estate of the testator, is a competent witness.' No legatee 
 must. be a witness, for though he is not incapacitated from 
 being such, yet it cuts out his own legacy ; and the husband 
 or wife of a legatee, though a good witness, car. take no 
 interest under the will." In such a disagreeable result, the 
 <lisappointed legatee would not lielp you to get out probate 
 with good grace. 
 
 Again, though you may have two or more witnesses, do not 
 add a legatee as a third or fourth, in the liope that there 
 being enough to attest the will without the legatee, his 
 signature can do no harm — it will cut him out all the same. 
 If a will has been inadvertently attested by two or more 
 persons, one of whom takes some benefit under it, it is not 
 necessary to make a new will ; for a codicil, witnessed by 
 two indifferent persons, and confirming the will, makes the 
 gift valid.'' This is all very well, if the testator is alive to 
 execute it, but it is better to remember what is neces- 
 sary at the time. A bequest or devise is not bad because 
 the person entiiied happens afterwards to marry a witness 
 to the will under >v})ich the same is claimed.' But it is 
 held, that a witness being a trustee, does not invalidate 
 a gift made to him on trust, even when the particular way 
 in which the gift is to be applied for the benefit of the 
 object designated is left to his discretion.* 
 
 There is no seal necessary in wills, unless where a power 
 of appointment is to be exercised by a writing under the 
 hand and seal of the donee. In this case, it cannot be 
 
 ' R. S. O. cap. io6, sec. iS. 
 
 = R. S. O. cap. io6, sec. 17. 
 
 5 Anderson v. Anderson. L. K. 13 Eq. 381. 
 
 * Hay & Jarm. Wills 29 n. In regard to the hardships that will occa- 
 sionally come from the best of rules, several cases in our own Courts are 
 in point. In England, the Probate Court was in one case, re Sharman, 
 L. R. I P. & M. 661, inclined to strike out the name of a third witness, 
 added after e.xecution, but if he signs as witness, and his name appears in 
 the probate, he takes no benefit under the will. Cozens v. Crout, W. N. 
 (1873) 144. 
 
 5 Cress7ve!l v. Crcssivell, L. R. 6 Eq. 69. 
 
WILLS — SIGNATURE. 
 
 24a 
 
 oxci'cisod by a will of the donee with the ordinary tbr- 
 
 iiiiilities.' 
 
 1. Signature. It would seem direction enough to say 
 that a will is to he signed at the foot or end thereof; and 
 yet many testators picked upon the most out-ot-the-way 
 ])laces to sign their name — at the sides, at the top, at any 
 vacant place that appeared. 
 
 Then, a clause like the following, taken from the Imp. 
 Act, 16-16 Vic. cap. 24, sec. 1, which is surely ample 
 enough, was inserted : 
 
 Every will, so far only as regards the position of the signa- 
 ture of the testator, or of the person signing for him as 
 aforesaid, shall be deemed to be valid, within the meaning 
 of this Act, if the signature is so placed at, or after, or 
 following, or under, or beside, or opposite to the end of 
 the will, that it is apparent on the face of the will that the 
 testator intended to give effect by such signature to the 
 writing signed as his will : and no such will shall be affected 
 by the circumstance that the signature does not follow, or 
 is not imraediatelv after the foot or end of the will, or bv 
 the circumstance that a blank space intervenes between the 
 concluding word of the will and the signature, or by the 
 circumstance that the signature is placed among the words 
 of the testimonium clause, or of the clause of attestation, 
 or follows, or is after, or under the clause of attestation 
 either with or without a blank space intervening, or follows, 
 or is after, or under, or beside the names or one of the 
 names of the subscribing witnesses, or by the circumstance 
 that the signature is on a side, or page, or other portion of 
 the paper or papers containing the will, whereon no clause 
 or paragraph or disposing part of the will is written above 
 the signature, or by the circumstance that there appears 
 to be sufficient space on or at the bottom of the preceding 
 side, or page, or other portion of the same paper on which 
 the will is written to contain the signature; and the enum- 
 eration of the above circumstances shall not restrict the 
 
 IS- 
 
 "3 
 
 • West V. Ray, Kay, 392 ; Taylor v. Meade, 34 L. J. Chy. 203. 
 
244 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 £ 
 
 
 t: 
 
 t 
 
 c; 
 c 
 
 generality of the above enactment ; but no signature under 
 tills Act shall be operative to give effect to any disposition 
 or direction which is underneath, or which follows it, nor 
 shall it give effect to any disposition or direction inserted 
 after the signature was made. R. S. O. cap. 106, sec. 12. 
 
 Notwithstanding this, one testator preferred to have a 
 whole sheet to himself and his witnesses, and then per- 
 versely wrote his name across the sheet'; and another dis- 
 dained to occupy the space at the foot or end of the last 
 page of his will, though there was room for him, but wrote 
 on another sheet*; and in both cases the wills were held to 
 be well executed.' 
 
 The will may be signed either by the testator or by some 
 other person in his presence, and by his direction, but such 
 signature must be made, or acknowledged, by him, in the 
 presence of two or more witnesses present at the same 
 time. He may be unable to write, or too ill to write, and 
 80 may make his mark.' or direct some one — one of the 
 witnesses' — to write for him ; and, in one case, the witness 
 wrote his own name, but stated he did so on behalf ot the 
 testator, in his presence and by his direction.* But it is 
 essential that the testator should know or approve of the 
 contents of the will at the time of its execution.' If the 
 signature be not made in the presence of two witnesses, it 
 must be acknowledged before them. No particular form 
 of acknowledgment is necessary, beyond a recognition that 
 it is his signature, though it is not necessary to say this in 
 so many words*; but the three persons must be present at 
 the acknowledgment,' as at the actual writing of the signa- 
 ture. 
 
 ■ Re Archer, L. R. 2 P. & M. 252. 
 ' Re Wotton, L. R. 3 P. & M. 159. 
 
 * See cases cited in Deane Con. 406. 
 
 * Jarm, on Wills, 104. 
 
 s Re Bailey, i Curt 914 ; Smith v. Harris, i Rob. 262. 
 
 ' Re Clark, 1 Curt. 329. 
 
 7 Hastiloxv V. Stobic, L. R. i P, & M. 64, and cases cited in Deane 407. 
 
 * Keigwin v. Keigwin, 3 Curt 607-Gii. 
 
 y Re Ayliiig, i Curt 913 ; re Mansfield, i No Cas. 362. 
 
WILLS — SIGNATURE. 
 
 245 
 
 2. "Witnesses, Tlie witnesses uro to attest, and judge 
 of the testator's sanity when they attest; and if ho is not 
 capable, they liavo a right to refuse to attest. In some 
 cases the vvitne:^ses are passive, but here they are active, and, 
 in truth, the principal parties to tiio transaction — the testa- 
 tor is entrusted to their care.' In case of doubt, it would 
 be but reasonable of the witness, in attesting, to state the 
 doubt. 
 
 The advantage of an attestation clause is, that when the 
 will, on the face of it, appears to be properly executed, 
 the Court will presume that the requirements of the Act 
 have been complied with, although the memory of the wit- 
 nesses may have failed." Where the attestation clause is 
 informal, the presumption omnia rite esse acta applies with 
 less force; but even in that case, the leaning of the Court 
 is not to allow the testator's intention to be frustrated by 
 lapse of time and failure of the memory of the witnesses ; 
 and if, therefore, the circumstances are such as reasonably 
 to lead to the conclusion that the will was duly executed, 
 the Court will adopt such conclusion.* On the other hand, 
 the direct testimony of one of the witnesses, that the 
 will was not duly executed, will disentitle to probate, not- 
 withstanding the attestation clause being perfectly regular.* 
 Where a third party swore that one of the witnesses 
 did not attest his signature to a codicil until after the tes- 
 tator died, the legatee, entitled under the codicil, accepted 
 the opinion of couns'jl that the codicil was inetfectual." 
 
 It is not necessary that the witnesses should actually 
 see the testator write — if they see him in the act of writing,* 
 or even if they are in such a position that they may, if 
 they please, see him in the act of writing.' But it is essen- 
 tial that there should be a possibility ot the witnesses see- 
 
 "1 
 
 le 407. 
 
 ' Lord Camden, in Hudson v. Kirscy, 4 Burns, E. L. 27. 
 
 - Prideaux Con. 357. 
 
 3 Vinnkombe v. Biitlef, 34 L. J. Prob. 18. 
 
 •» Croft V. Croft, 34 L. J. Prob. 44. 
 
 5 Re Branniff, unreported case of the writer's. 
 
 <> Smith V. Smith, L. R. i P. &. M. 143. 
 
 7 Newton v. Clarke, 2 Curt 320, 
 
246 
 
 PIUCTICAL CONVEYANCINri. 
 
 ing the testator write,' and that liia signature should bo 
 made or acknowledged he/ore those of the witnesses are 
 afhxed to tlio will.- 
 
 And a witness may make a mark, even though he can 
 write,* and even a marksman may have a wrong surname 
 written opposite his mark, it' it ho otherwise properly 
 attested.* His signature must he made so that the tes- 
 tator can see him write.' 
 
 g 
 
 
 K 
 
 
 mn 
 
 
 c 
 
 
 .C 
 
 
 S 
 
 
 Si 
 
 !■ 
 
 
 P 
 
 ,v^, 
 
 
 IX. UEVOCATION. 
 
 Before proeeeding to prove a man's will, it must be con- 
 sidered whether this will may not be revoked. Every will 
 is revoked by the marrhKfc ot the party making it, except 
 wills made in exercise ot a power of appointment* ; but the 
 birth of a ciiild after the makintj of a will does not 
 revoke the will.' And a will is revoked if made on the 
 same da^', but previously to the testator's marriage, not- 
 withstanding \\\n intention to the contrary." No alteration 
 in the circumstances of the testator gives rise to any pre- 
 sumption ot revoking, though it may defeat the entire 
 object of the will, or any particular devise.' 
 
 A will may, of course, bo revoked by a subsequent will 
 or codicil, though the latter are silent as to former wills. 
 A codicil coniirms such parts of a will as it does not 
 revoke." 
 
 A will may be revoked by any writing — a letter, etc., if it be 
 duly witnessed as a will " ; or by the burning, tearing or 
 destroying of a will ammo rcvocandi." 
 
 ' Rf Cnliiiaii, 3 Curt iiy. 
 
 » Re Olding. 2 Curt 80.5 ; Re By yd, 3 Curt 117. 
 
 ^ Re Amiss, 2 Rcb. 116. 
 
 ■* Re Ashmore, 3 Curt 756. 
 
 ■; Newton v, Clarke, 2 Curt 320, Deane Con. 407. 
 
 " R. S. O. cap. io5, sec. 20. 
 
 7 Re Tu/i.ey, C, Pr. R. 672. 
 
 "^ Otway V. Sadlier, 33 L. T. 4G. 
 
 9 Farrar v. Wintcrtou, 5 Beav. i ; R. S. O. cap. 106, sec. 21. 
 
 '« R- Howard, L. R. i P. & M. 636. 
 
 " Re Durance, L. R. 2 P. & M. 406. 
 
 " See R. S. O. cap. loG, .sec. 22. 
 
WILLS — REGISTRATION OF WILLS. 
 
 •247 
 
 Tlio (lostruotiou of » will, if not tho act of tho testiitor, 
 must bo ill hirt prosonco ha well (18 by his dii'oction, so tiiut 
 takinoj it into aiiothor room and biirnin*^ it there, is not ii 
 sufficient revocation.' After the testator's death, of course, 
 it cannot bo revoked, even at tho written recjuest of the tes- 
 tator, unless the writiui^ is sutHciont under tiio Statute. 
 But if no will be i'omid in the testator's custody, at the 
 time of his death, then a will K'liich, previous thereto, had 
 remained in his custody, will be presumed to have been 
 revoked by him in his lifetime.'^ 
 
 Tho provisions in our law relatin*^ to tiio revocation *>( 
 a will by marriacje, by change of circumstances, or by tlu^ 
 act of the testator, apply to all wills since the .31st of 
 ■December, 18C8.' 
 
 Where obliterations, interlineations, or other alterations 
 are made in a will, at or after the execution thereof, tliey 
 must be executed the same as the will ; and tho initials of 
 the witnesses set opposite in the margin of the will, or other 
 explanatory memorandum, will be sufficient for that i>ur- 
 pose." 
 
 X. REGISTKATION OF WILLS. 
 
 A will need not be registered, unless where the title to 
 lands in it is to be perpetuated ; and, for this purpose, it 
 can be registoreJ at any time, and any person claiming 
 land under it, cannot be cut out, by a sale or mortgage, 
 from the heirs, provided he registers within one year from 
 the death of the testator or testatrix. In case the devisee 
 is under any disability, by reason of the will being con- 
 tested, or by any other inevitable difficulty, not due to 
 his wilful neglect or default, then he has twelve months 
 after the removal of such impediments." Infancy is not 
 an inevitable difficulty within this section of the Registry 
 
 ■•'•mm 
 
 '.3- 
 3» 
 
 ' Re Dadds, 29 L. T. 99. 
 
 ^ Eckcrsley v. Piatt, L. R. i P. & M. 281-284. 
 
 1 R. S. O. cap. 106, sec. S. 
 
 * Ibid, sec. 2j. 
 
 5 R. S. O. cap. Ill, sec. 75. 
 
248 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 \ct ' ; and all the circumstances of the case would have to be 
 considered, in order to show how the devii^ees could be 
 barred." 
 
 XL PllOBATE. 
 
 In the event of the will not havinj:; been revoked, and it 
 being ascertained, as far as may be in doubtful cases, that 
 the will propounded for probate is the last will, or that the 
 several wills, in a possible case, are entitled to jn'obate, 
 then the papers are prepared therefor. 
 
 Aftf'v the death of the testator, and when the will is 
 obtained, it is usual to read it over to the members of the 
 fam.iiy, and long usa-'c, in this regard, has come to be 
 regarded as customary law, and supposed bv many to hv 
 essential to the validity of a will. 
 
 No steps are usually taken towards filing the necessary 
 papers in the Surrogate Court till seven days after the 
 death of the testator. In the meantime, however, the 
 executors named in the will jan be seen, and if they do 
 not wish to act, a renunciation must be drawn up. If all 
 refuse to act, or if they are dead, and the will is left with 
 no one as executor, then, on the application of some per- 
 son, unobjectionable and interested, either as next of kin, 
 or as a creditor, the Surrogate Judge will appoint him 
 administrator with the will annexed — cumtestdmcnUxumaxo. 
 And where no person is named in the will as executor, this 
 will be done, as has been remarked, where only one ijerson 
 is interested thereunder. 
 
 It is necessary, also, when friends of the deceased come 
 in, in reference to proving a will, to get all necessary infor- 
 mation as to the goods and chattels, money, stock, etc., etc., 
 so as to be a,ble to prepare the required inventory, and to 
 give an approximate value to the personal estate. The 
 fees payable at the Surrogate oftieo will depend on the 
 value of the personal estate ; and it seems if any real 
 
 ' McLcoil V. Triia.v, 3 O. S. 455-459. 
 ' See re Davis, 27 Chy. igy. 
 
WILLS — PROBATE. 
 
 2i0 
 
 €'state is to be sold, or turned into money, that this is to 
 be regarded as personal estate. 
 
 You will also require the particulars as to the time and 
 place of death of the deceased, where he had his usual 
 place of abode, the names in full of the witnesses and of the 
 executors. 
 
 The papers necessary to be prepared in proving a will 
 are the following : 
 
 1. Petition to Surrogate Court. 
 
 2. Affidavit of death, place of abode, etc. 
 
 3. Affidavit of execution of will, by one of the witnesso;-; 
 thereto. 
 
 4. Executor's oath. 
 
 5. Inventory and affidavit verifying same. 
 
 Having jn-epared all these papers, and attached them to 
 the will, the several deponents can come in and swear to 
 them. 
 
 After the value of the property is calculated, you can sei 
 what fees are to be paid to the Surrogate Court under tlie 
 following scale : 
 Where the value of the personal property is 
 
 Under !iil,'200 .^2 00, Judge's fee. 
 
 From $1,200 to $3,000 . . 3 00, 
 
 From $3,000 to $4,000 . . 4 00, " " 
 
 Every additional $1000, add $1.00. 
 
 Under $200, only $2 is to be ch irged. 
 
 Additional fees to the Surrogate Court depend on the 
 length of the will. 
 
 Having deposited the i)apers and money with the clerk, 
 if everything is found sufficient, the probate will issue in a 
 few days. In case of any defect in the papers stnit in, yoii 
 will be advised by the clerk as to how it may be remedied. 
 
 However, a more important elieck is a (■<(! 'at, filed in 
 the Surrogate office, in Osgoode Hall, or w. writ of injunc- 
 tion from the High Court of Justice, enjoining the executor.^ 
 from j)roceeding to issue probate. This forms the conten- 
 tious or litigious business of probate find wills, wliich is W) 
 part of this treatise. 
 
 
 3* 
 
2/50 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCIXd. 
 
 I 
 
 c: 
 C 
 
 
 
 V 
 
 Cv 
 
 c- 
 
 As probate is better evidence of a will than the will itself, 
 it follows that in a title to real estate, even where there is no 
 personalty in the will, it is necessary that the will thereto 
 be proved. The executor can safely act only when probate 
 is issued ; and probate is necessary in a will made in execu- 
 tion of a power, and affecting personalty' ; but a will merely 
 appointing a guardian need not be proved.' T>esides, the 
 executor transmits the representation — he is the link 
 itetween the dead and the living. As to this, it ma}" lie 
 remarked here that, if A., an executor, dies, having appointed 
 13. his executor, 15. becomes the executor of the originnl 
 testator ; but if the ih'st executor dies intestate, his admin- 
 istrator does not represent the original testator, but letters 
 of administration, dc Ixittin lum, with the will annexed, of 
 the original testator, must be taken out. In like maniur, 
 if A. dies intestate, and J3. takes out letters of administra- 
 tion to liis estate, and afterwards dies, the executor or 
 administrator of ]». does not represent A., but new letters 
 of administration, <lc Ixmis non of A., must be taken out. 
 
 if two or more ])ersons are appointed executors, and all 
 prove the will, the representation passes to the executor of 
 the last survivor.' 
 
 On the issue of prol)ate, the executors are the legal and 
 authorized representatives of the deceased. They collect 
 in his accounts, by suit or otherwise, and defend actions 
 brought against liis estate. They pay oft' creditors, who 
 have proved true debts in the usual way, and for this they 
 advertise for creditors in the county or otlu'r proper paper. 
 They have a year within which to pay ot^" debts and realize; 
 the estate ; and no legatee can enforce the payment of his 
 legacy by suit till after a year from tlu; death of the testator. 
 After that he can sue the executors the same as any other 
 creditor. It is not till the last dollar of the personal 
 •■state is paid over that these duties are over. They can then 
 apply to the Surrogate Court for their discharge, and, if 
 
 ^O^} 
 
 ' Piideaiix Ce.ii. 4i<). 
 
 -■ In II- Morton, y L. J. I'rob, 87. 
 
 i Prid. Con. 413. 
 
WILLS — PROIiATR. 
 
 251 
 
 necessary, to be iillowed compensation under tlic Act in 
 that behalf. They have nothin^j; to do with the real estate, 
 unless specially authorized under the will ; nor are they 
 interested in heirs, or next of kin, until a residue is left in 
 their hands, which is not disposed of by the will. This 
 they pay over to tlie next of kin, under the statute of dis- 
 tribution ; though it does not often happen tliat an executor 
 is called upon to do this. His position, in that regard, is 
 the same as if he were administrator upon an intestacy. 
 
 All executor or administrator has no right, as such, ti» 
 receive the rents of real estate ; as to them, he is merely an 
 intermeddlei', and will not be entitled to any commission 
 thereon'; but, in an exceptional case, where the widow 
 administratrix collected the rents, and acted as guardian, 
 the Court did not interfere with an allowance found by the 
 blaster.' 
 
 [f an executor renounces, he forfeits any becjuest in his 
 favour."' 
 
 The statutory powers of executors are set out iu the 1\l-\\ 
 Stat. Ont., cap. 107 
 
 ' ^"^■J? V. Da-^^fr, 25 Chy. 542. 
 ■ Doon V. Davis, 23 Chy. 207. 
 ' PaioH V. Dickson, 25 Chy. 542. 
 
 313 
 
PRECEDENTS, 
 
 FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 I 
 
 c 
 
 c 
 
 c 
 
 etc: 
 PS s 
 
 try 
 
 5:j 
 
PRECEDENTS, 
 
 FORMS AND REFERENCES 
 
 UNDER THE PRECEDING CHAPTERS. 
 
 I. UNDER THE INTRODUCTORY 
 CHAPTER. 
 
 S. 
 
 I. P ARTIES. 
 
 1. The Crown. Under the British Nortli America Act, 1867, by sec. 92 
 sub-sec. 5. the Province of Ontario may exclusively make laws in relation 
 to— 
 
 The management and sale of the public lands belonging to the Province, 
 and of the timber and wood thereon. 
 
 By sec. 109 of the same Act — 
 
 All lands, mines, minerals and royalties, belonging to the several pro- 
 vinces of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick, at the Union, and all 
 sums then due or p,ayable for such lands, mines, mini rals and royalties, 
 shall belong to the several Provinces of Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, 
 and New Brunswick, in which the same are situate, or arise, subject to any 
 trusts existing in respect thereof, and to any interest other than that of the 
 I'rovince in the same. 
 
 (3n the other hand, by sec. gf. sub sec. i, the Parliament of Canada has 
 exclusive legislative authority • r the public debt tand property, the duties 
 ■anfl revenues forming the c.' i h ated revenue fund. sec. 102 ; and all 
 stocks, cash, bankers balances . rurities for money in each Province 
 
 at the date of the Union belonginj, to the Dominion of Canada, 
 
 In this Province the public i.:nds have retained the name of Oown 
 Lands. Other territorial revenues, as escheats, have been appropriated \>y 
 the Provncial authorities on behalf of the Crown ; but the .^■. -!em. 
 
 «3 
 
 
-254 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 Court of Canada has decided, in Mercer v. The Attorney-General of Ontario. 
 that it is the Attorney-General of Canada who represents the Crown in 
 such matters.' 
 
 R. S. O. cap. 94, declares that lands escheated by reason of intestacy, or 
 where there are no lawful heirs, or where forfeited for any cause except 
 crime, can be taken by the Attorney-General of this Province, on behalf 
 of the Crown. 
 
 2. Corporations. See R. S. O. cap. 98, sec. 8, as to conveyance by bar- 
 gain and sale. 
 
 Under R. S. O. cap 167, any five or more persons may become incor- 
 porated for any benevolent, provident or oilier purpose, not illegal, and may 
 hold and acquire lands to the value of not more than $5,000 per annum. 
 The manner of becoming mcorporated is as follows : 
 
 A declaration is drawn up setting out the intended corporate name, the 
 objects if the society, the mode of electing officers, etc. This is signed by 
 at least hve of the intended corporators, and the fact of such execution 
 proved ir. some way. 
 
 The declaration (usually executed in duplicate) is presented to a Judg 
 of the County Court, or any of the Judges of the High Court of Justice, 
 and if it appears to him to be in conformity with the Act he endorses a 
 certificate to that effect on the declaration. 
 
 When the declaration is filed, either in the office of the Provincial Sec- 
 retary, or in that of the Clerk of the Peace, for the County, the incor- 
 poration is complete. 
 
 Separate provisions are made for unincorporated societies existing before 
 1874. If the parties wish the certificate of incorporation to be unimpeach- 
 able thi y must follow the procedureiaid down in the Statute, by publica- 
 tion in tl. Ontario Gazette, etc. 
 
 DECLARATION OF INCORPORATION. 
 
 Pursuant to the Revised Statute of Ontario, chaptered 167, and Amendments 
 
 thereto. 
 
 We {setting out the n.imcs of at least Jive of the intended corporators) do 
 solemnly declare that it is our intention to. become incorporated under the 
 Act respecting Benevolent, Provident and other Societies, Revised Statutes 
 of Ontario, chaptered 167. 
 
 1. That the intended corporate name of our Society (or Institution, etc., 
 as the case may be) is 
 
 ' The result of the decision m this case has just come to hand — four of 
 the six judges in the Supreme Court being in favour of the central 
 authority — the Chief .Tustice and Mr. Justice Strong be-ng in favour of the 
 provincial rights. This decision will, nc doubt, be appealed from. 
 
PRECKHENTS, FORMS AND REFEREXCES. 
 
 2r>r> 
 
 2. That the objects of the said society are as follows : 
 
 3. That the manner in which our first trustees or managing oflicers is U 
 be appointed is as follows : 
 
 In witness whereof we have hereunto set our hands at 
 in the county of this day of 188 
 
 Declared before me. 
 
 Witness. 
 
 A. B. 
 C. D. 
 !■:. F. 
 (1. H. 
 I.J. 
 
 Certificate on the foregoing for the Judge to sign ; 
 
 The within declaration having been presented to me after execution 
 of the same by the parties thereto, as appears by the affidavit of 
 thereunto attached, I certify that the said declaration appears to mij u> 
 be in conformity with the provisions of the Act respecting Benevolent, 
 Provident and other Societies, R. S O. cap. 167. 
 
 Justice of the High Court of 
 Justice, Division ; 
 
 oi\ 
 
 Judge of the County Court 
 of the Countv of 
 
 I tors) do 
 Inder the 
 I Statutes 
 
 tion, etc.. 
 
 --four of 
 
 central 
 
 lur of the 
 
 Where the society has been in existence before 1S74, some modifications 
 of the declaration are necessary ; and where the society has rules printed 
 or otherwise for the election, etc. of officers, these can be attached to the 
 declaration and filed with it. 
 
 Other Statutory provisions must be noted regarding — 
 
 Cemetery Companies, R. S. O. cap. 170. 
 Burial Societies, R. S. O. cap. 171. 
 
 Mechanics' Institutes, R. S. O. cap. 168; 42 Vic. cap. 29. 
 The property of Religious Institutions, R. S. O. cap, 216 ; 42 Vic. 
 cap. 36, and 41 Vic. cap. 25. 
 
 3. Trustees and Executors. See R. S. O. cap. 107, as to these, and also 
 as to administrators. 
 
 See also R. S. O. cap. 98, sec. 10 and 11, as to execution of powers. 
 
 4. Husband and Wife. See R. S. O. cap. 124, as to the solemnization of 
 marriage. 
 
 The separate rights of property of married women are, so far as statutory 
 separate estate is concerned, regulated by R. S. O. cap. 1 25. The conveyance 
 of their real estate, legal or equitable, is effected by a deed of grant in which 
 the husband is made a part\ thereto ; but a Judge of the High Court of 
 
 
 ;2»' 
 ■•4 
 
 ■li' 
 I' 
 
256 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINa. 
 
 Justice or of the County Court may, in certain cases, dispense with the 
 husband's signature, under R. S. O. cap. 128. 
 
 The dower of married women is regulated by R. S. O. cap. 126, and 42 
 Vic. cap, 22, O. 
 
 An important Statute is R. S. O. cap. 129, securing to wives and children 
 the benefit of assurances on the lives of their husbands and parents. An 
 amendment to this, passed in 1881, 44 Vic. cap. 15, repeals sec. 15 of the 
 Revised Statute, and prescribes that the assured may direct the applica- 
 tion of bonuses and profits. 
 
 5. Infants, Lunatics, etc. 
 
 I. Guardians, etc., of Infants. 
 
 See R. S. O. cap. 132, and 44 Vic. cap. 16 O. as to guardians of infants, 
 how appointed or removed, etc. 
 
 See R. S. O.cap. 135, as to guardians to minors — their rights and liabili- 
 ties, and apprenticing the same; also, R. S. O. caps. 130, 131, as to the 
 custody and support of children; R. S. O. cap. 124, sec. 13, as to marriage 
 of a minor. 
 
 2. Ratification of Promise during non-age. 
 
 R. S. O. cap. 117, sec. 8, says: 
 
 " No action shall be maintained whereby to charge any person upon any 
 promise made after full age to pay any debt contracted during infancy, or 
 upon any ratification after full age of any promise or simple contract made 
 during infancy, unless such promise or ratification is made by some writing 
 signed by the party to be charged therewith, or by his agent duly autho- 
 rized to make .such promise or ratification. " 
 
 c:; 
 
 So 
 
 6. Aliens. 
 
 The Naturalization Act of 1881 • (D) enacts that " Real and personal 
 property of every description may be taken, acquired, held and disposed 
 lit by an alien, in the same manner, in all respects, as by a natural born 
 Briti.sh subject ; and title to real and personal property of every descrip- 
 tion may be derived through, from, or in succession to. an alien, in the same 
 manner, in all respects, as through, from, or in succession to, a natural 
 born British subject." 
 
 But an alien cannot by this section be the owner of a British ship. 
 A married woman shall within Canada be deemed to be a subject of the 
 State of which her husband is for the time being a subject. 
 
 Other particulars are given in this Act as to widows, children, etc. 
 
 ' 44 Vic. cap. 13. (D). The proclamation appointing the time for this 
 Act to come in force must be looked for. 
 
niECEDENTH, FORMS AND liKFERENCES. 
 
 ^.> J 
 
 The following forms are prescribed by the Act, and may be administered 
 by any Judge, by a Justice of the I'eaco of the county or district where the 
 alien resides, a Notary Public, Stip<!ndiary Magistrate, or a Tolice 
 Magistrate : - 
 
 THE NATURALIZATION ACT O.' CANADA. 1881. 
 
 Ontli of Residence. 
 
 I, A. B., do Sivear {or, bciiiij a person allowed by lnw to nffinn iu Judicial 
 cases, do ajfirin) that, in the period of years preceding this date, I 
 
 have resided three [or five as the case iniiy be) years in the Dominion of 
 Canada with intent to settle therein, without having been, during such 
 three years (or five yenrs, as the ease may be) <a stated resident in any 
 foreign country. So h( Ip nie God. 
 
 Sworn before me at 
 on the 
 day of 
 
 A. IV 
 
 lersonal 
 
 lisposed 
 
 ■al born 
 
 Idescrip- 
 
 |he same 
 
 natural 
 
 THE NATURALIZATION ACT OF CANADA, iSSi. 
 
 Oath of Service. 
 
 I, A. B., do swear (or, being a person allowed by law to affirm in judieial 
 cases, do affirni) that, in the period of years preceding this date, I 
 
 have been in the service of the Government of Canada [or, of the Govern- 
 ment of the Province of , in Canada, or as the ease may be) for 
 the term of three years, and I intend, when naturalized, to residf in 
 Canada (or, to serve under the Government of as the ease 
 may be). 
 
 Sworn before me at 
 on the 
 day of 
 
 A. D. 
 
 
 ip. 
 
 ;t of the 
 Itc. 
 
 for this 
 
 THE NATURALIZATION ACT OF CANADA. 18S1. 
 
 Oath of Allegiance. 
 
 I, A. B., do sincerely promise and swear (or, being a person allotved by 
 law to affirm in judicial cases, affrm) that I will be faithful and bear true 
 allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, as lawful Sovereign of tiie 
 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and of the Dommion of 
 Canada, dependent on and belonging to the said Kingdom, and that 
 I will defend Her to the utmost of my power against all traitorous 
 conspiracies or attempts whatever which shall be made against Her 
 
 o's.c. 17 
 
258 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVKYANCIN(i. 
 
 Person, Crown nnd Dijjnity, and that I will do my utmost endeavour to 
 disclose and make known to Her Majesty, Her Heirs or Successors, all 
 treasons or traitorous conspiracies and attempts which I shall know to be 
 against Her or any of them ; and all this I do swear {or affirm) without any 
 equivocation, mental evasion or secret reservation. So help me God. 
 
 Sworn before me at 
 this 
 day of 
 
 A. b. 
 
 B. (Ste Section 13). 
 
 THE NATURALIZATION ACT OF CANADA. 1881. 
 
 Certificate under Section 12. 
 
 I, C. D. (name and description 0/ the person be/ore whom the oaths have 
 been taken — See Section 11), do certify that A. B., an alien, on the 
 day of , subscribed and took, before me, the oaths [or affirmations) 
 
 of residence and allegiance {or service and allegiance, as the case may be), 
 authorized by the tenth section of The Naturalization Act, Canada, 1881, 
 and therein swore {or affirmed) to a residence in Canada {or service, etc.), 
 of years; that I have reason to believe and do believe that the 
 
 said A. B., within the period of years preceding the said day, 
 
 has been a resident within Canada for {three or five, as the case may be) 
 years {or has been in the service of the Government of Canada for three 
 years ; or, as the case may be), that the said A. B. is a person of good 
 character, and that there exists, to my knowledge, no reason why the said 
 A. B. should not be granted all the rights and capacities of a natural born 
 British subject. 
 
 Dated at 
 
 the 
 
 day of 
 
 CD. 
 
 If the above certificate be applied for by a person, with respect to xvhose 
 nationality a doubt exists, and who desires a special certificate of naturali- 
 Mation under Section eighteen, add the following : 
 
 " I further certify that the said A. B. has doubts as to his nationality as 
 a British subject, and desires a special certificate of naturalization under 
 section eighteen of said Act." 
 
 If the above certificate be applied for by a person previously a 7iatural born 
 British subject, but who became an alien by naturalization, an appropriate 
 statement to that effect should be inserted in the certificate. 
 
PUECEDKNTS, FORMS AND REFKUENCES. 
 
 
 avour to 
 3sors, all 
 o\v to be 
 hout any 
 [lod. 
 
 A. 13 
 
 I. 
 
 oaths have 
 le 
 
 Jirmations) 
 it may be), 
 nada, 1881, 
 'rvice, etc.), 
 re that the 
 said day, 
 ISC may be) 
 frt foy three 
 on of good 
 hy the said 
 atural born 
 
 CD. 
 
 ct to ivhose 
 of naturali- 
 
 tionality as 
 ition under 
 
 latural born 
 appropriate 
 
 II. RECITALS. 
 
 I. Where Executor 0/ Purchaser Conveys. 
 
 WnKREAS the said E. F. duly made his will, dated the day of 
 
 18 , and thereby devised all his real estate to the said A. B. 
 and his heirs, and appointed the said C. D. executor of his said will, and 
 WiiijREAS the said E. F. died on or about the day of 
 
 without having altered or revoked his said will, which was duly proved in 
 the Surrogate Court of the county of on or about 
 
 day of June. 
 
 2. Valuation. 
 
 Whereas the said A. B. and C. D. have valued the said messuage or 
 tenement and hereditaments at the sum of 9 , and annexed to their 
 
 said valuation a declaration in writing subscribed by them of the correct- 
 ness thereof. 
 
 3. That Pitrchascrs bouffht as Trustees. 
 
 as 
 
 Whereas the said A. B. and C. D. purchased the said lot 
 trustees of the said will of the said C. D. 
 
 4. State of Mortgage Debt. 
 
 Whereas the principal sum of $1,000 is still due to the said A. B., but 
 interest on the said sum has been paid up to the day of the date of these 
 presents ; or 
 
 Whereas there is now due to the said A. B. the sum of $1,000 for 
 principal money, and the further sum of $52 for interest thereon up to 
 the date hereof, making together the sum of $1,052 on the mortgage made 
 to the said A. B., as aforesaid ; or 
 
 Whereas there is now owing to the said A. B., on the security of the 
 said indenture of mortgage, for principal, interest and costs, the sum of 
 $1,000 and no more, and the said X. Y. is desirous of paying the said 
 debt, etc. 
 
 5. Sale by Auction. 
 
 Whereas the said A. B. (as creditors, assignee, etc.) caused the lands 
 hereinafter described to be put up for sale by auction on the 
 day of last ; and at the raid sale the said E. F. was the highest 
 
 bidder, and was declared to be the purchaser thereof, at the price of $5000, 
 
 6. Renunciation of Probate. 
 
 Whereas the said G. H., by a deed poll under his hand and seal, 
 dated the day of renounced and disclaimed all and 
 
 singular the real and personal estate whatsoever devised or bequeathed by 
 
 ttm 
 
IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 ^ 
 
 /. 
 
 ^ 
 
 O -/^ 
 
 
 v.. 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 1.25 
 
 Ui 128 
 
 t us 
 
 IIM 
 
 M 
 1.8 
 
 1.4 II 1.6 
 
 y] 
 
 <9^ 
 
 '#^.^'>j 
 
 /a 
 
 ^. 
 
 M 
 
 %/^^ 
 
 o 
 
 7 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 33 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
 ^ 
 
 V 
 
 iV 
 
 4>^ 
 
 :\ 
 
 \ 
 
 V 
 
 
 «^ 
 
 ^ ^I'^s 
 
 ^ 
 
 r^^ 
 
 17 
 

2f)0 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 the said will, and all devises, bequests, legacies and benefits expressed to 
 be matle or Riven to him by the said will, and also the said office of trustee 
 and executor of the said will, and all and singular the trusts and powers, 
 authorities, rights and privileges whatsoever under the said will ; or 
 
 Wmkreas the said G. H., having renounced probate, has never inter- 
 meddled with the estate of the said F. y., or acted on any of the trusts of 
 the said will. 
 
 7. Probate. 
 
 VVherkas the said E. F. died on or about the day of 
 
 without having altered or revoked his said will, which, on the day of 
 
 was duly proved by the said C. D. in the Surrogate Court for 
 the County of 
 
 8. Power to appoint new Trustees. 
 
 Whereas the said K. F. and G. H. were empowered, in case the said 
 trustees should die or decline the execution of the trusts to appoint trus- 
 tees in their place who should be invested with all the powers given to the 
 trustees appointed, and 
 
 VV'herea* by an indenture, dated , the said I. J. and K. L. were, 
 
 pursuant to the aforesaid power of appointing trustees, constituted trustees 
 of the said settlement in the place of A. M. and C, D. 
 
 g. Power of Sole. 
 
 Whereas by the indenture now in recital, the said A. B. was empowered 
 at any time after default in payment of the said sum of , or the 
 
 interest thereof, or any part thereof, at tlie time aforesaid, to sell the said 
 hereditaments by public auction or private contract; And the indenture 
 now in recital contains declarations to the effect that the receipt of the 
 said A. H. for the purchase-money sliould be a sufficient discharge, exon- 
 eratmg the purchaser from all liability in respect of the application thereof ; 
 And that the sale and conveyance to be made by the said A. B. should 
 be conclusive on the said R. C, his heirs and assigns, whether such default 
 as aforesaid should be made or not ; Anu whereas the said A. B., in 
 pursuance of the said power of sale, has contracted with the said W. X. 
 for the sale to him of the said hereditaments hereinafter described, at the 
 price of 
 
 (Set usual form under Deeds of Grant, post.) 
 
 10. Attained Majority. 
 
 And Whereas the said C. B., who is the eldest son of the said A. B. and 
 E. B., attained his age of 21 years on the day of 
 
 last. / 
 
 II. Marriage. 
 
 Whereas the said M. B., on the day of 
 
 intermarried with H. J., deceased, and had issue three children and no 
 more. 
 
rRECEDKNTS, FORMS AND REFEKKNCKS. 
 
 201 
 
 iSSOfl tf> 
 
 trustee 
 powers, 
 )r 
 
 ir inter- 
 trusts of 
 
 r2. Mortf^iifTc. 
 
 Wherkas, by an indenture, datefi in consideration 
 
 of the sum of ^1,000, paid by the said A. H. to the said C. D., the 
 lands hereinafter expressed to be hereby granted were conveyed to the 
 said C. D.. subject to a proviso for redemption of the said premises on 
 payment by the said C. D. to the said A. H., the sum of 9i.ooo with 
 interest at the rate of 7 per centum per annum, on the day of 
 
 day of 
 ;ourt for 
 
 the said 
 oint truE- 
 ren to the 
 
 . L. were, 
 d trustees 
 
 13. Lease. 
 
 Whereas, by an indenture, dated 
 all the lands and tenements were demised unto the said C. D., from the 
 
 day of for the term of 
 
 years, at the yearly rent of 9500, payable quarterly, as therein men- 
 tioned, and subject to the covenants and conditions therein contained, 
 and on the part of the lessee, his executors, administrators and assigns 
 to be performed and observed. 
 
 14. Intended Marriage. 
 
 Whereas a marriage is intended soon to be solemnized between the 
 said D. B. and E. F. 
 
 I powered 
 , or the 
 11 the said 
 indenture 
 lipt of the 
 jige, exon- 
 |n thereof ; 
 B, should 
 ;h default 
 A. B., in 
 laid W. X. 
 »ed. at the 
 
 A. B,and 
 
 kn and no 
 
 15. Grant of Letlers of Administration. 
 
 Whereas the said F. R. died on or about the day of 
 
 intestate, leaving the said P, R., his only son, 
 and heir at law, and letters of administration of the goods, chattels and 
 credits of the said F. R., were granted to the said N. D,, on the 
 day of by the Surrogate Court of the County of 
 
 16, Inability to pay Debts. 
 
 Whereas the debtor J. is indebted to the creditors for various sums of 
 money, which he is unable to pay in full. 
 
 17. Agreement to ae.ept Composition. 
 
 Wherkas it has been agreed that the debtor shall pay to the creditors 
 a composition of cents on the %. on the amount of the respective 
 
 debts, at the time and in the manner hereinafter mentioned, which com- 
 position is to be accepted by the creilitors in full satisfaction and dis- 
 charge of these debts. 
 
 18. Conveyance in Trust for Sale. 
 
 Whereas, by an indenture, dated the lands 
 
 hereinafter described, were conveyed unto and to the use of A. B. &C. I),, 
 and iheir heirs upon trust, at any time thereafter, at the request of the said 
 £. F., to sell the said lands or any part thereof, by public auction or private 
 
 ■3 
 
 .9 
 « 
 
262 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 contract, and convey the same lo, or according to, tlie directions of the 
 purchaser thereof. 
 
 19. Contract for Sale. 
 
 Whbrbas the said A. R. has contracted with the said C. D. for the sale 
 to him of the fee simple or possession of the said hereditaments, at the 
 price of 9 1, 000. 
 
 20. Contract for Loan. 
 
 Whbrbas the said A. B. has a^^reed to lend to the said X. Y. the sum 
 of 9 , on having the repayment thereof, with interest, at the rate 
 
 hereinafter mentioned, secured in the manner hereinafter appearing. 
 
 21. Agreement for Husband and Wife to live apart. 
 
 Whereas certain unhappy differences having arisen between the said 
 A. B. and the said C. D., they have agreed to live separate from each 
 other. 
 
 22. Codicils not affecting devise of realty. 
 
 Whereas the said testator made several other codicils to his said will^ 
 none of which revoked or in any manner affected the devise of his real 
 estates contained in his said will. 
 
 23. Assignment of Lease. 
 
 And WHEREAS, by an indenture, dated the day of , made 
 
 between A. B. of the one part, and C. D. of the other part, the premises 
 demised by the hereinbefi.re recited indenture, were assigned to, and the 
 same are now vested in. the said C. D., for all the residue of the term of 
 years created by the said indenture of lease, subject to the payment 
 of the rent reserved by and to the performance of the covenants contained 
 in the same indenture 
 
 24. Sale or Mortgage by Mechanics' Institute. 
 
 Whereas, by a resolution of two-thirds of the directors or trustees of 
 Mechanics' Institute, it was resolved, on the day of 
 
 that a sale of the property hereinafter mentioned should be carried out ; 
 and WHEREAS by a meeting of the members of said Institute duly called 
 by circular, on the day of , wherein it was stated that it 
 
 was proposed to sell the said property ; and whereas there attended the 
 said meeting members who were entitled to vote, and by a majority 
 
 thereof the said sale was approved of. 
 
 {The resolution of the directors or trustees must be approved of within six 
 months, which the dates above will show). 
 
 25. Letters Patent. 
 
 Whereas Her Majesty Queen Victoria, by letters patent, dated, etc., 
 for herself, her heirs and successors, granted to the said A. B., his execu- 
 
s of the 
 
 the sale 
 s, at the 
 
 the 
 
 sum 
 
 the 
 
 rate 
 
 "S- 
 
 
 the 
 
 said 
 
 rom 
 
 each 
 
 said willr 
 f his real 
 
 , made 
 premises 
 o, and the 
 e term of 
 s payment 
 contained 
 
 trustees of 
 
 f 
 
 rried out; 
 
 uly called 
 
 ed that it 
 
 tended the 
 
 a majority 
 
 within six 
 
 ated, etc., 
 his execu- 
 
 PRECEDENTB, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 263 
 
 tors, administrators and assigns, or such others as he or they should at 
 any time agree with, and no others, from time to time, and at all times 
 hereafter during the term of fourteen years from the date thereof, the sole 
 and exclusive license, privilege and authority to make, use, exercise and 
 vend within the Dominion of Canada an invention for, etc. 
 
 20. Agreement for a Sale of Land. 
 
 WiiBREAS the said party of the first part has agreed to sell to the said 
 party of the second part, and the said party of the second part has agreed 
 to purchase from the said party of the first part the lands and premises 
 known as, etc. 
 
 27. Agreement for Partnership. 
 
 Whereas the said A. B. and C. D. have agreed to enter into a partner- 
 ship and joint trade as grocers, to be carried on and exercised upon the 
 terms and conditions and subject to the covenants, provisions and agree- 
 ments hereinafter contained. 
 
 28. Assignment of Judgment Debt. 
 
 Whereas the said party of the first part recovered a judgment in the 
 
 Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice on or about the 
 
 day of against John Smith for the sum of 9t.ooo damages, and $150 
 
 costs, making together the sum of 91,150; and whereas the said party of 
 
 the first part has agreed to assign unto the said party of the second part 
 
 the said judgment and all benetit to arise therefrom, cither at law or in 
 equity. 
 
 The Statute relating to Benevolent, Provident and other Societies. 
 
 R. S. O. Cap. 167. 
 
 Whereas public notice of a general meeting of the ha» 
 
 been duly given, pursuant to the by-laws of the said (association or society, 
 itc), and WHEREAS such meeting was specially called for considering a 
 sale (mortgage, exchange or lease) of the land hereinafter mentioned ; and 
 WHEREAS a resolution was assented to by a majority of the members at 
 the said general meeting, ilirecting the said lands to be sold (mortgaged, 
 exchanged or leased, as the case may be.) 
 
 III. ATTESTATION. 
 
 I. Ordinary. 
 
 Signed, sealed and delivered by the within named parties, in the pres- 
 ence of 
 
 2. By an Attorney. 
 
 Signed, sealed and delivered, as the act and deed of the within named 
 A. B,, by C. D., his duly authorized attorney, in the presence of 
 
 111 
 
 
■}'■■ ■ 
 
 '^f 
 
 it- 
 
 ,1 
 
 264 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 3. By a Blind Party. 
 
 Signed, etc., by the within named A. H. (a blind person). The contents of 
 the within written indenture were first audibly and correctly read over to 
 him, when he seemed perfectly to understand the same, in the pres- 
 ence of ■ 
 
 4. By a Oiaf and Dumb Party. 
 
 Signed, etc. {who being deaf and dumb, but ivho could read). The con- 
 tents of the within written indenture were first read over by him. when he 
 seemed, etc. 
 
 5. By a Marksman. 
 
 Signed, etc., by the within named A. B., the contents of the within 
 written indenture being first read over to him, when he seemed perfectly 
 to understand the same, and made his mark thereto, in the presence of 
 
 ii 
 
 IV. TESTIMONIUM CLAUSE. 
 
 I. Ordinary Clause. 
 
 In witness whereof, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands 
 and seals this d?v- of 
 
 A. D. 1881. 
 
 Signed, sealed and delivered, in 
 the presence of 
 
 2. Power of Attorney, 
 
 In witness whereof, the said A. 13. has set his hand and seal, and G. H., by 
 virtue of a power of attorney enabling him in that behalf, a copy whereof 
 is hereunto annexed, has set the hand and seal of the said A. B„ this 
 
 day of 1881. 
 
 Signed, sealed and delivered 
 
 in the presence of A. B. 
 
 By G, H., his Attorney. 
 
 (See R. S. O. cap. 95, sees. 14 and 15, as to powers of attorney). 
 
 3. By a Corporation. 
 
 In witness whereof, the said The 
 affixed its corporate seal, this 
 A.D. 1881. 
 
 Signed, sealed and delivered by the 
 President and Secretary of the said 
 Society, pursuant to the provisions 
 of their Act of Incorporation, iu pres- 
 ence of {or as the case may be). 
 
 Society have hereunto 
 day of 
 
 m- 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 4. Mcchanici Institittes. 
 
 205 
 
 In witness whereof, the said Mechanics' Institiito 
 
 have hereunto affixed their corporate stal. and 
 the President and Secretary of the saiii Mechanics' 
 
 Institute have hereunto signed these presents in execution of this deed. 
 
 6. Religious Institutions. 
 
 {See R. S. O. eap 216.) 
 
 it: 
 
 I; 
 
 H.. by 
 whereof 
 B.. this 
 1881. 
 
 •County of 
 
 To wit 
 
 V. WITNESSING, ETC. 
 
 I. Affidavit for Registration. 
 
 \ I. {name in full — no initials), 
 i of the of 
 
 In the County of (Jill in profession or occupation 
 
 of witness — give some description), make oath and say : 
 
 1. That I was personally present, and did see the annexed or within 
 {grant or mortgage, etc.) and duplicate {if there is one) duly signed, sealed 
 and executed by and 
 
 the parties thereto {or one of the parties thereto, as the case may be). 
 
 2. That the said deed or mortgage, etc., and duplicate ((/ there is one) 
 were executed at the of 
 
 {stating city or toivn, etc., and county). 
 
 3. That I know the said parties, or one or more of them, according to 
 the fact. 
 
 4. That I am a subscribing witness to the said deed or mortgage, etc., 
 and duplicate, if there is one. 
 
 {The witness must subscribe his name under the attestation clause and 
 receipt clause in his own handwriting, as such witness. R. S. O.cap. in, 
 sec. 46). 
 
 Sworn before me, at the 
 of this 
 
 day of 188 . 
 
 A Commissioner, or Justice of the Pmcc. 
 fur the county, as the case may be, or the 
 Registrar or Deputy-Registrar, or any 
 jfudgc in Ontario. 
 
 Isual name of witness. 
 
 The proof of the foregoing may be made by affirmation a.s well as by 
 affidavit {R. S. O. cap. iii, sec. 45). and no party to the instrument can 
 take tile affidavit ot the witness {Ibid, sec. 46.) 
 

 266 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 Where officers of a corporate body are required by Statute to attest the 
 execution by the corporation, the preceding form may be used, with the 
 addition that it was executed in the particular manner required by the 
 Statute: but for the purposes of registration merely, any instrument under 
 the seal of any corporation, with the signature of the secretary or presid- 
 ing officer thereof, is sufficiently evidenced by the seal thereof. The same 
 applies to any Court of Record, or to certificates in Chancery, etc. 
 
 2. Affidavit for Registration of Crown Grant, 
 {Heading as in No, i). 
 
 I. That I have compared the copy hereunto annexed with the Crown 
 grant to (or with an exemplification of Crown grant to) 
 
 with the said grant {pr exemplification, as the case may be), and that the 
 same is a true copy. 
 
 Other instruments, except grants from the Cro\ , and wills, must be 
 registered by a deposit of the original instrument, or by the deposit of a 
 duplicate, or other original part thereof, with affidavit, as in No. i. 
 
 The registration of wills will be referred to hereafter. 
 
CHAPTER II. 
 
 TITLE. 
 
 SOLICITOR S ABSTRACT. 
 
 A solicitor's abstract should contain a statement of the documents and 
 evidence relating to certain particular premises in which all that is neces- 
 sary to enable counsel to judge upon the validity of the title is given at 
 length, and all that is immaterial is retrenched.' 
 
 The English rules as to the commencement of titles are of not much 
 importance in this country, as the title is usually traced to the Crown ; 
 but it may be remembered that if this is not convenient, it is desirable to 
 commence an abstract with a Deed rather than a Will, and that a mort- 
 gage is the best deed to commence with. The idea of a sixty years' title 
 being good is not relied upon either here or in England. 
 
 It is recommended in arranging the deeds to give them in a chronological 
 ord*r. Where a party's name appears for the first time, a place of resi- 
 dence, the additions and the character as heir, executor, etc., should be 
 fully set out, and different persons of the same name should be dis- 
 tinguished. 
 
 The recitals will hereafter be of considerable importance, and a recital 
 should be set out in full, if it is to be noticed at all ; and any recital which 
 may materially affect the history of the legal or etpiitablc title should be 
 fully expressed." 
 
 Powers, trusts or agreements should be fully set out, and as the validity 
 of the deed may depend upon its conformity to these previous instiuments, 
 it is advisable to give the recital verbatim. 
 
 Uses to bar dower should be given in the langu.ige of the deeds, as 
 should also powers which h.ive been exercisetl, or which are to be exercised, 
 in order to complete the title. Trusts must be abstracted so far as is 
 necessary in order to shew that the act which was directed to be dnno has 
 been duly performed. It .seems that trusts should always he. referred to, 
 no matter whether exercised or not. 
 
 Births, marriages, deaths, etc., should be transferred into the Abstract. 
 as they are there found ; but other facts of importance should be given in 
 chronological order. 
 
 The testatum, or witnessing clause, and the payment of the consideration 
 money should be fully and correctly given ; particularly when there is 
 
 
 • 3 Stewart Con. i 
 
 * 1 Prest. Abstracts, 56. 
 
 'i 
 
 Si 
 

 208 
 
 rilACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 necessity to see that it is jiaid to a particular person, or applied in a par- 
 ticular inannor; and when it is stated that it is in full for the "absDJuto 
 purchase, etc.," or " in full for the absolute payment and discharge, ' or 
 when the consideration is blood or marriage. 
 
 The pdrcih must be given at full lenglh, as they are contained in the 
 first deed in the abstract, or in iif! grant from the Crown, but need not 
 be referred to again so long as their identity is re:;ularly preserved. 
 
 The frtiicrnl words need only be referred to where the deeds are not 
 under our Statutory I'orms. 
 
 The hahendnm is important where the estate is not limited to the grantee 
 only, and in that case should be carefully looked into. 
 
 The provisos and conditions should always be abstracte 1 ; and in the 
 case of leases, it is important that the exact circumstances under which 
 the forfeiture is to take place should be set out. In leases, also, the 
 reddendum clause should show the quantum of rent and the times of pay- 
 ment and as to the taxes, rates, etc. 
 
 Covenants should ha notice 1 by their omission, or where they are quali* 
 fied or unusual, and the class of representatives that are bound by them. 
 All the burdensome covenants in a lease should be given. 
 
 The execution and attestation should set out sufficient to show that the 
 <leed was duly executed by all the necessary parties. If any prescribed 
 manner is enjoined, it must appear that it was followed.' 
 
 The absence of the receipt clause may bu constructive notice that the 
 consideration money was not in fact paid. 
 
 Finally, it is recommended to abstract memoranda of registration, col- 
 lateral agreement between the parties, any interlineation, or anything 
 endorsed on the deed. 
 
 The abstract of a will should contain the name and description of tes- 
 tator — the words of the gift or devise — any qualifying expression in the 
 words of the test,ator — the probate — the e.\ecution and attestation — so as 
 to shew that the devisee was not a witness — the appointment of executors, 
 and any codicils affecting the will. It is generally recommended that wills 
 should be copied, not abstracted. 
 
 Where an intestacy occurs, the letters of administration should be 
 referred to — their date — from what county — by whom obtained, etc. 
 
 I'roceedings in the High Court of Justice set out the date of the writ or 
 of filing the bill — names of the p.irties and the decree, Master's report, or 
 other proceedings, so far as it affects the particular title. 
 
 The abstract should be accompanied by a statement of facts supporting the 
 title, certificates, probates, letters of administration, genealogical tree, etc." 
 
 K. S. O. cap. log, being an Act to amend the law of vendor and purchaser 
 and to simplify titles, is as follows : 
 
 I . In the completion ot any contract of sale of land made after the pas- 
 sing of this Act, the right i and obligations of vendors and purchasers shall 
 
 ' See R. S. O. cap. ( S, sees. lo and ii, as to execution of powers. 
 - Tiiese observatiors have been taken from Gardenor's Directions for 
 Drawing Abstracts, Kindly lent the writer by Mr. Taylor, Q.C. 
 
PRECKDENTS, FORMS AND UEFERKNCE8. 
 
 269 
 
 ing the 
 
 etc.* 
 
 chaser 
 
 le pas- 
 's shall 
 
 )ns for 
 
 1)2 re;,'ul,'iterl by the followiiiK rules {but subject to any stipulation in such 
 contract to the contrary), namely : — 
 
 (i.) Recitals, statetntMits and descriptions of facts, matters and parties 
 contained in deeds, instruments, Acts of Parliament or statutory declara- 
 tions twenty years old at tlic date of the contract, shall, unless and except 
 so far as they shall be proved to be inaccurate, be taken to be suflicient 
 evidence of the truth of such facts, matters and descriptions. 
 
 (2.) Registered memorials of discharged mortf^ages shall be suHicient 
 evidence of the mortgat^es without the production of the mortgages tliem- 
 selves, unless and except so far as such memorials shall be prove.l to be 
 inaccurate ; and the vendor shall not be bound to produce the mortgages 
 unless they appear to be in his possession or power. 
 
 (3.) In case of registered mem trials twenty years old, of other instru- 
 ments, if the memorials purport to be e.xecuted by the grantor, or, in other 
 cases, if possession has been consistent with the registerjil title, the memo- 
 rials shall be suflicient evidence without the production of the instruments 
 to which the memorials relate, except so far as such memorials shall be 
 provei to be inaccurate ; the vendor shall not be bound to produce the 
 original instruments unless they appear to be in his possession or power, 
 and the memorials shall bo presumed to contain all the material contents 
 of the instruments to which they relate. 
 
 (4.) Where a registered deed of conveyance acknowledges payment of 
 the consideration money, such acknowledgment .shall be sufficient evi- 
 dence of payment, except so far as such acknowledgment shall be proved 
 to be inaccurate. 
 
 (5.) The inability of the vendor to furnish the purchaser with a legal 
 covenant to produce and furnish copies of documents of title, sh.all not be 
 an objection t > title in case the purchaser will, on the completion of the 
 contract, have an equitable right to the production of such documents. 
 
 2. In suits at law or in equity it shall not be necessary to produce any 
 evidence which, by the first section of this Act, is dispensed with as be- 
 tween vendor and purchaser ; and the evidence therein declared to be 
 sufficient as between vendor and purchaser shall be prima facie sufficient 
 for the purposes of such suits. 
 
 3. A vendor or purchaser of real or leasehold estate in Ontario, or their 
 representatives respectively, may at any time or times, and from time to 
 time apply in a summary way to the Court of Chancery, or a judge thereof, 
 in respect of any requisitions or objections, or any claim for compensation, 
 or any other question arising out of or connected with the contract (not 
 being a question affecting the existence or validity of the contract) ; and 
 the judge shall make such order upon the application as to him shall 
 appear just, and shall order how and by whom all or any of the costs of, 
 and incidental to, the application shall be borne and paid. 
 
 As to title by possession, see Act as to Limitation of Actions, R. S. O. 
 cap. 108. As to Wills, R. S. O. cap. 106. Inheritance, cap. 105. 
 Mechanics' Liens, R. S. O. cap. 120. Improvements Under a Mistake of 
 Title, R. S. O. cap. 95. 
 
CHAPTER III. 
 
 i 
 
 AGREEMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE. 
 
 FORMAL PARTS OF AN AGREEMENT. 
 
 Memorandum of agreement made this 
 A.D. i88 , 
 
 day of 
 
 Between 
 second part. 
 
 of the first part, and 
 
 of the 
 
 Witnesseth, that the said parties hereto do hereby agree, each with the 
 other, in manner foUoiving : 
 
 I. That, etc. (Here add tin terms of the particular agreement.) 
 
 In witness whereof, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals 
 the day and year first above written. 
 
 Signed, sealed and delivered in the ^ 
 presence of 
 
 {Witness.) 
 
 L.S. 
 L.S. 
 
 AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE OF LAND. 
 Formal parts as above. 
 
 1 . That the party of the first part agrees to sell to the party of the second 
 part, and the party of the second part has agreed to purchase of and from 
 the party of the first part, the lands and premises hereinafter mentioned being 
 (here set out the lands as minutely as possible, and the interest the purchaser is 
 to take therein), for the price and sum of I of lawful money of 
 Canada, to be paid as follows. {Then set out the manner and days of pay- 
 ment, and the rate of interest) . 
 
 2. The party of the second part to investigate the title to the same 
 premises at his own expense, {here add any restrictions as to title-deeds, 
 title, etc.), and to tender a good and sufficient conveyance to the party of 
 the first part for execution thereof, free from all dower and other encum- 
 brances. 
 
PnECKDKNTS, FORMH AND RKFKIIKNCKS. 
 
 271 
 
 3. The party of the hccoiuI part is ' ikc |X)ssc!iHiun, and the said 
 premises are to l)c at his risk on the day of 
 
 {as the case may be). 
 
 4. In case the title cannot he made out to the satisfaction of the party 
 of the second part, he, the party of the second part, shall not be entitled 
 to any compensation for any expense incurred in the examination of the 
 title, and he shall have one month to examine the same. 
 
 5. The mortgage to be given by the party of the second part is to con- 
 tain the usual covenants, including a covenant to insure to the extent 
 off 
 
 6. The party of the first part is to pay all taxes, rates and assessments, 
 but the proportionate part of the taxes fur the current year is to be borne 
 by the party of the second part. 
 
 7. Time is to be of the essence of this agreement. 
 
 8. The party of the first part is to be at the expense of satisfying the 
 requisitions of title, the execution of the conveyances to the party of the 
 second part, and of the mortgage to himself, and of registering the same, 
 and the party of the second part is to bear all the other expenses. 
 
 In witness whereof, etc. 
 
 Attention may be called to the matter ^'^t out — ante pages 62-64 — and 
 any of the foregoing clauses or others may be used, so as to carry out the 
 intention of the parties. 
 
 Where an agreement for a lease is required, the term of years, the man- 
 ner of payment, and the amount of the rent and the covenants must be 
 considered. See ^05/ leases. In order that an agreement for a lease may 
 not operate as a lease, it is desirable to state that it is intended to oper- 
 ate as an agreement only. 
 
 AGREEMENT FOR A MORTGAGE. 
 (Identify the parties as borrower and Under.) 
 
 1. The lenders will advance and the borrower will advance upon the 
 security hereinafter mentioned a loan of $ 
 
 2. The borrower shall execute a proper mortgage deed with the usual 
 covenants to repay principal and interest. 
 
 3. The terms of the mortgage are to be as follows : — 
 
 4. The security shall be first mortgage in fee simple, with good title to 
 the property offered as security. 
 
 5. Preparation of the deeds shall be made at the expense of the bor- 
 rower, and all other expenses to be incurred or incidental to the said loan. 
 
 i 
 
 CONDITIONS OF SALE. 
 
 R. S. O. cap. 98, presciibes the following as to auctions: — 
 Sec. 13. Unless in the particulars or conditions of sale by auction of 
 any land, it is stated that such land will be sold subject to a reserved price. 
 

 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 or to a right of the seller to bid, the sale shall be deemed and taken to be 
 without reserve. 
 
 Sec. 14. Upon any sale of land by auction without reserve, it shall not 
 ho lawful for the seller or for a puffer' to bid at such sale, or for the auc- 
 tioneer to take knowingly any bidding from the seller or from a puffer. 
 
 Sec. 15. Upon any sale of land by auction subject to a right of the seller 
 to bid, it shall be lawful for the seller or any one puffer to bid at such 
 auction in such manner as the seller may think proper. 
 
 Sec. 16. Nothing in the four next preceding sections contained shall be 
 taken to authorize any seller to become the purchaser at the sale. 
 
 Sec. 18. Renders a vendor or mortgagor liable in damages for conceal- 
 ing any settlement, deed, will, or other instrument, material to the title, or 
 any incumbrance, or for falsifying the pedigree of the title. There is a 
 criminal liability also by fine or imprisonment, or both, for such fraudulent 
 concealment, etc. 29 Vic. cap. 28, sec. 20 D. 
 
 CONDITIONS OF SALE IN USE BY THE HIGH COURT OF 
 
 JUSTICE. 
 
 1. No person shall advance less than at any bidding under 
 
 nor less than at any bidding over and 
 
 na person shall retract his bidding. 
 
 2. The highest bidder shall be the purchaser, and if any dispute shall 
 ari.se as to the last or highest bidder the property shall be put up at a 
 former bidding. 
 
 J. The parties to the suit, with exception of the vendor and are to 
 
 be at liberty to bid. 
 
 4. The purchaser shall at the time of sale pay down a deposit in the 
 proportion of for every of his purchase money to the vendor, 
 or solicitor, and shall pay the remainder of the purchase money on 
 the day of next, and upon such payment the purchaser 
 shall be entitled to the conveyance and to be let into possession, the pur- 
 chaser at the time of sale to sign an agreement for the completion of the 
 purchase. 
 
 5. The purchaser shall have the conveyance prepared at his own expense 
 and tender the same for execution. 
 
 6. If the purchaser fail to comply with the conditions aforesaid, or any 
 of them, the deposit and all other payments made thereon shall be 
 forfeited, and the premises may be re-sold and the deficiency (if any) by 
 
 ' Puffer means a person appointed to bid on the part of the seller. 
 Sec. 12. 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 273 
 
 such re-sale, together with all charges attending the same, or occasioned 
 by the deaulter, are to be made good by the defaulter. 
 
 Dated the 
 
 dav of 
 
 A.D. i8 
 
 I agree to purchase mentioned in the annexed particulars 
 
 tor the sum of and upon the terms mentioned in the above con- 
 
 ditions of sale. 
 
 Dated the 
 Witness 
 
 day of 
 
 A.D. i8S 
 
 are to 
 
 in the 
 
 vendor, 
 
 Jney on 
 
 rchaser 
 
 le pur- 
 
 of the 
 
 bxpense 
 
 jor any 
 lall be 
 iny) by 
 
 SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SALE. 
 
 In addition to the conditions used in the High Court of Justice tht: 
 following circumstances may be made the subject of special conditions : 
 
 1. The production of the title-deeds. 
 
 2. Any mistake in the description of the property, or other error not to 
 annul the sale, but to be the subject of compensation. 
 
 3. Valuation of fixtures or timber, etc. 
 
 4. Restrictions as to the title— effect of recitals — copies of deeds. 
 
 5. Particulars of the mortgage (if any) to be given by the purchaser. 
 This may either be done by a lenqthy condition, or by attaching a draft 
 mortgage. 
 
 (). Particulars of rents, outgoings, possession, etc. Where the property 
 put up for sale is in mortgage, but not sold under a power of sale, in such 
 mortgage reference should be made to this fact. 
 
 Snles by trustees or assignees, etc., should apprise the purchaser of ihe 
 character in which they sell, so that the purchaser may not expect full 
 covenants. 
 
 seller. 
 
 s.c. 
 
 18 
 
CHAPTER IV. 
 
 SALES OF LAND. 
 
 J8 
 
 " Land" extends to messuages, lands, tenements and hereditaments, 
 whether corporeal or incorporeal, and to any undivided share thereof, and 
 to any estate or interest therein, and to money subject to be invested in 
 the purchase of land, or of any interest therein, so far as the transfer of 
 real property is concerned • ; but under the Short Forms Act for Sales and 
 Mortgages, "land" extends only to all freehold tenements and heredita- 
 ments, whether corporeal or incorporeal, or any undivided part or share 
 therein respectively.* 
 
 A contingent, an executory, and a future interest, and a possibility 
 coupled with an interest in any land, whether the object of the gift or 
 limitation of such interest or possibility be or be not ascertained, also a 
 right of entry, whether immediate or future, and whether vested or con- 
 tingent into or upon any land, may be disposed of by deed, but no such 
 disjx)sition shall by force only of this Act defeat or enlarge an estate tail, 
 and any such disposition by a married woman shall be made in conformity 
 with the provisions of the Married Woman's Real Estate Act.i 
 
 Under the Act^ respecting free grants and homesteads, it is provided that 
 neither the locatee, nor any one claiming under him or her, shall have 
 power to alienate [otherwise than by devise), or to mortgage or pledge any 
 land located as aforesaid, or any right or interest therein, before the issue 
 of the patent. 5 
 
 No alienation, (othent'ise than by devise), and no mortgajre or pledge of 
 such land, or of any right or interest therein by the locatee after the issue 
 of the patent, and within twenty years from the date of such location, and 
 during the lifetime of the wife of such locatee, shall be valid or of any 
 effect, unless the same be by deed, in which she is one of the grantors with 
 her husband, nor unless such deed is duly executed by her.* 
 
 On the death of the locatee, whether before or after the issue of the 
 patent for any land so located, all his then tight and interest in and to such 
 
 « R. S. O. cap. 98. sec. r. 
 » Ibid, cap. 102 & 104, sec. I. 
 3 Ibid, cap. 98, sec. 5. 
 
 * R. S. O. cip. 24, sec. 14. 
 » Ibid, cap. 24, sec. 14. 
 
 * Ibid, cap. 24, sec. 15. 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 275 
 
 laments, 
 reof , and 
 irested in 
 ansfer of 
 iales and 
 [leredita- 
 or share 
 
 lossibility 
 le gift or 
 ed, also a 
 d or con- 
 t no such 
 istate tail, 
 jnformity 
 
 ided that 
 Ihall have 
 lledge any 
 
 the issue 
 
 1 pledge of 
 the issue 
 lation, and 
 lor of any 
 Tutors with 
 
 |sue of the 
 id to such 
 
 land shall descend to and become vested in his widow during her widow- 
 hood in lieu of dower, in case there be such widow surviving such locatee ; 
 but such widow may elect to have her dower in such land in lieu of the 
 provision aforesaid.' 
 
 It has been held that free grants of lands for homesteads are only 
 authorized to be made to men.» 
 
 The following is a summary of the Free Grants Act and Regulations : 
 
 SUMMARY OF THE FREE GRANTS ACT AND REGULATIONS. 
 
 1. Any man over i8 years of age may be located for loo acres as a free 
 grant. The male, or sole female, head of a family, who has a child or chil- 
 dren under i8 years of age residing with him or her, may be located for 
 200 acres as a free grant ; and tlie male head of a family may purchase an 
 additional 100 acres at the rate of fifty cents per acre cash. 
 
 2. In townships which are sub-divided into sections and quarter sec- 
 tions, or into lots containing i6o or 320 acres each — the applicant for loca- 
 tion, whether the head of a family or a single man, may be located for a 
 full quarter section, or 160 acres, and may purchase an additional 160 
 acres. 
 
 3. Where a locatee is entitled to two lots, {200 acres), he must select lots 
 that are adjoining, or at least near enough to be occupied and cultivated 
 as one farm. 
 
 4. Locations are made by the local Crown Lands Agents, with whom the 
 necessary affidavits must be deposited before the location will be carried 
 out. 
 
 5. A locatee is allowed one month to enter upon and occupy his land. 
 
 6. The settlement duties required are: to have at least 15 acres cleared 
 and had under cultivation, of which 2 acres at least are tu be cleared and 
 cultivated annually duting the five years next after the date of location, to 
 build a habitable house, 16x20 feet in size ; and to actually and continuously 
 reside upon and cultivate the land for five years after location. Absence, 
 however, from the land for in all not more than six months in any year, 
 shall not be considered a cessation of residence, provided that the land be 
 kept under cultivation. Upon performance of these settlement duties, and 
 at the expiration of five years from the date of location, the patent may 
 be issued. 
 
 7. Upon failure to perform the aforesaid settlement duties, the loca- 
 tion is liable to forfeiture. Applications for cancf.'llation of a location 
 must be made through the local agent, and evidence of disinterested 
 parties must be filed, showing the position of the land, the length of time 
 it has been unoccupied, and the whereabouts of the locatee (if knoivn). 
 
 8. A locatee who holds two lots (200 acres) may perform his settlement 
 duties on either one or both lots, as he finds most convenient. 
 
 • Ibid, cap. 24, sec. 17. 
 
 » Rogers v. Louithian, 27 Chy. 559. 
 
270 
 
 PRACTICAL C0NM5YANCING. 
 
 9. A locatee who purchases an additional 100 acres, must clear 15 acres 
 thereon and cultivate the same for five years from the date of sale, before 
 he will be entitled to the patent. Buildin{» a house and actual residence 
 is not required on a purchased lot, where it is held in connection with a 
 free grant. 
 
 10. All pine trees and minerals on the land are reserved, and the Com- 
 missioner of Crown Lands has power to issue licenses to cut timber on 
 lands located or sold under the Free Grants Act and Regulations. The 
 locatee, however, may cut and use such trees as may be necessary for the 
 purpose of fencing and fuel ; and may al.so cut and dispose of all trees 
 recjuired to be removed in actually clearing his land for cultivation ; but 
 ]iine trees cut in process of clearing shall be subject to the payment of the 
 usual timber dues to the Crown. 
 
 11. Holders of timber licenses have the right to haul their timber over 
 the uncleared portion of any land located or sold, and to make such roads 
 as may be necessary for the purpose, and to use all slides, portages, and 
 have free access to all streams and lakes. 
 
 12. The Crown reserves the right to construct on any land located or 
 sold, any colonization road, or deviate from any allowance for road, and to 
 take from such land material for that purpose without compensation. 
 
 13. The locatee has no power to sell or alienate his land {except by -will) 
 until after issue of patent. 
 
 14. No alienation {except by t.;.'/) nor mortgage after issue of patent, and 
 within 20 years from location, shall be valid, e.xcept the wife be one of tht; 
 grantors. 
 
 15. In case of the death of the locatee, leaving a widow, the land vests 
 in her during widowhood, unless she prefers to accept her dower in it. 
 
 16. The land, while owned by the locatee, his widow or heirs, shall 
 be exempt from liability for debt during 20 years from date of location. This 
 exemption does not. however, extend to a sale for ta.\es legally imposed. 
 
 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR LOCATION, 
 
 Under the Free Grouts Act, by a Party who is entitled to only One Hundred 
 
 and Fifty Acres. 
 
 I, of make oath and say, that I have 
 
 not been located for any land under the "Free Grants and Homesteads 
 Act," or under any regulations passed by Order in Council under the said 
 Act ; nor have I obtained a patent for any land, under the said 
 Act, as a free grant, or under the authority of that portion of the said 
 Act which provides for the remission of arrears due to the Crown by 
 settlers in the Free Grant Townships ; that I am of the age of 
 years, and that I desire to be located for lot number in 
 
 the Concession of the Township of that I 
 
 believe the said land is suited for settlement and cultivation and is not 
 valuable chiefly for its mines, minerals, or pine timber ; and that such 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 277 
 
 location is desired for my benefit, and fur the purpose of actual settle- 
 ment and cultivation of such lands, and not either directly or indirectly 
 for the use or benefit of any other person or persons whatsoever, nor for 
 the purpose of obtaining;, possessinf^ or disposing of any of the pine trees, 
 growing or being on the said land, or any benefit or advantage therefrom, 
 or any gold, silver, c ippar, lead, iron or other mines or minerals, or any 
 quarry or bed of stone, marble or gypsum thereon, and that the said lot 
 is wholly unoccupie 1 a'lil unimproved, except 
 
 Sworn before me at 
 this day of 
 
 18 
 
 at I have 
 mesteads 
 
 the said 
 the said 
 
 the said 
 ^rown by 
 
 in 
 that I 
 d is not 
 lat such 
 
 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR LOCATION. 
 
 Under the Free Grants Act, by a party who is the head oj a family, having 
 children under 16 years of age. 
 
 T, of make oath and say, that I have 
 
 not been located for any land under the "Free (Irants and Homesteads 
 Act," or under any regulations passed by Order in C'ouncil, under the said 
 Act ; nor have I obtained a patent for any land as a free grant, under 
 the said Act, or under the authority of that portion thereof which pru- 
 yides for the remission of arrears due to the Crown by settlers in the Free 
 (Jrant Townships ; that I am the male head of a family 
 
 having children under eighteen years of age (consisting 
 
 of son and daughter ,) rosiding v.ith me, and 
 
 that I desire to be located under the said Act, and the Regulations of the 
 27th May, 1869, made thereunder, for lot number in the 
 
 Concession, and lot number in the 
 
 Concession of the Township of that I believe the said 
 
 lands are suited for settlement and cultivation, and are not valuable chiefly 
 for their mines, minerals, or pine timber ; and that such location is desired 
 for my benefit, aU'i for the inirpose of actual settlement and cultivation (;f 
 such lands, and not either directly or indirectly for .the use or benefit of 
 any other person or persons whatsoever, nor for the purpose of obtaining, 
 possessing, or disposing of^any of the pine trees growing, or being on the 
 said lands, or any benefit or advantage therefrom, or any gold, silver, 
 copper, lead, iron, or other mines or minerals, or any quarry, or bed of 
 stone, marble, or gypsum thereon, and that the said lots are wholly unoc- 
 cupied and unimproved, except 
 
 Sworn before me at 
 this day of 
 
 x8 
 
 We 
 
 ofthe 
 of the 
 
 in the 
 in the 
 
 and 
 jointly 
 
278 
 
 PRACTICAL CONTEYANCING. 
 
 and severally make oath and say : That we are well acquainted with 
 
 named in the above affidavit, and that he is the 
 head of a family, and has children under eighteen years of 
 
 age (consisting of son and daughter ), 
 
 residing with him. 
 
 Sworn before me at 
 
 this 
 
 i8 
 
 day of 
 
 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR ISSUE 
 OF PATENT TO A FREE GRANT LOCATION. 
 
 ONTARIO. 
 County of 
 
 To Wit 
 
 :r 
 
 We, of the Township of 
 
 in the County of and 
 
 in the Township of in the County of 
 
 each for himself, make oath and say, 
 
 .■f># 
 
 That I am well acquainted with lot number in the 
 
 Concession, of the Township of ; that 
 
 now resides upon the said land, and has actually and continuously resided 
 upon, and cultivated the same for years last past ; that 
 
 there are acres of it cleared, cultivated, and had under crop, 
 
 and a habitable house of the dimensions of feet, by 
 
 feet, erected on the same ; that these improvements were made by, and on 
 behalf of the said and that he, this deponent, is not 
 
 aware of any adverse claim to, or occupation of, the said lot. 
 
 And I, ( ),the applicant for myself, make oath and say that I have been 
 an actual and continuous resident on the said land for years, and 
 
 have cleared, cultivated and had under crop acres, and erected 
 
 a habitable house, feet by thereon ; that there is no adverse 
 
 claim to the said lot ; and that I have not been located, nor have I received 
 patent for any other land under the Free Tenants and Homesteads Act, 
 or the Regulations made thereunder, as a free grant, or by remissions of 
 arrears due to the Crown on land purchased on free grant townships. 
 
 Sworn before me at \ 
 
 in the County of j. 
 
 this day of 1 
 
 I have reason to believe that the statements made in the above affidavit 
 are correct. 
 
 Crown Land Agent. 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 279 
 
 in the 
 
 1. Statutory Died of Conveyance, under R, S. O. cap. xo2. 
 
 This Indenture, made the day of A.D. i8 , in 
 
 pursuance of the Act respecting Short Forms of Conveyances : Between 
 {recitals, etc.) 
 
 WITNESSETH, that in consideration of 9 of lawful money of 
 
 Canada, now paid by the said part of the part, to the 
 
 said part of the first part, the receipt whereof is hereby by 
 acknowledged, the said part of the first part do grant unto 
 
 the said part of the part, heirs and assigns, for ever: 
 
 All, etc. (parcels). 
 
 The said part of the first part covenant with the said part 
 
 of the part, that 
 
 said part of the 
 
 of the first part. 
 
 And that the said part 
 sion of the said lands. 
 
 Free from all incumbrances. 
 
 ha the right to convey the said lands to the 
 part notwithstanding any act of the said part 
 
 of the 
 
 part shall have quiet posses- 
 
 And the said part of the first part convenant with the said part 
 of the part, that will execute such further assurances of the 
 
 said lands as may be requisite. 
 
 And the said party of the first part covenants with the said party of the 
 part that he will produce the title deeds enumerated hereunder and 
 allow copies to be made of the same at the expense of the said party of 
 the part. 
 
 And the said part 
 of the " part, that 
 
 And the said part 
 of the part all 
 
 of the first part covenant with the said part 
 ha done no act to encumber the said lands. 
 
 of the first part release to the said part 
 claims upon the said lands. 
 
 And the said A. B., wife of the said part 
 bar dower in the said lands. 
 
 In witness whereof, etc. 
 
 of the first part, hereby 
 
 affidavit 
 
 2. Conveyances not under the Statute. 
 
 Instead of the word "grant' being used alone it is usual to add 
 "grant, bargain, sell, convey, confirm, etc." The general words under 
 sec. 4 of R. S. O. cap. 102 should be added, and the expanded forms of 
 the covenants should be used. (See .Appendix.) 
 
 3. Deed under Power of Sale. 
 
 (Recitals as ante page 260. Strike out all the covenants, except that the 
 grantor has done no act to encumber that he releases all his claims upon the 
 land, and that the matters recited in the said Deed are true.) Or 
 
280 
 
 PRACTICAIi CONVEYANCING. 
 
 This Indenture, made (/« duplicate) the day of 18 , 
 
 in pursuance of the Act respecting Short Forms of Conveyances. 
 
 Bktween hereinafter called " the grantor," of the first part 
 
 hereinafter called " the grantee," of the second part. 
 
 Whereas one by indenture of bargain and sale, by way of 
 
 mortgage, made the day of 18 , and duly registered 
 
 in the registry office of the under number did grant 
 
 and convey the lands, hereditaments and premises hereinafter particularly 
 described unto herein called the grantor for securing payment 
 
 of the sum of and interest as therein mentioned. 
 
 And whereas in said mortgage there is contained a proviso that in case 
 the said should make default in payment of principal or interest 
 
 for month the said grantor giving notice 
 
 to the said might enter on and lease or sell the said lands. 
 
 And whereas it is further provided in and by the said mortgage that on 
 any default in the payment of interest, the whole of the principal should 
 at once become due and payable. 
 
 And whereas default has been made in payment of the said sum of 
 
 , and notice of sale has been duly given to the said 
 And whe kas the said lands have been advertised for sale pursuant to 
 
 the said power contained in said mortgage by public auction at 
 
 by advertisement inserted in the proper newspapers and by posters. 
 
 And whereas the said lands were offered for sale at public auction 
 pursuant to such advertisement as aforesaid, and the sale conducted in a 
 fair open manner when the said grantee was declared the highest bidder at 
 and for the price and sum of % 
 
 Now this Indenture, etc. 
 
 (Add usual ivords of conveyance, etc. Omit covenants, except that grantor 
 has done no act to encumber, and add general release and the following 
 covenant.) 
 
 The said grantor covenants with the said grantee that the facts as cited 
 herein are true, and that the mortgage undar which this sale takes place 
 is a good and valid security. 
 
 {The mortgagee's wife need not be a party.) 
 
 In witness whereof, etc. 
 
 Where t^^ere is no power of sale in a mortgage the deed should set out 
 the requirements of the Statute, 42 Vic. cap. 20. 
 
 4. Deed by Executors. 
 
 Recitals as ante page 259. As to death, probate, etc.; also the powers 
 vested in executors with covenants, that they have done no act to encumber, 
 and releasing all their claims. 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 281 
 
 i8 
 
 5. Detd by a Married Woman. 
 
 If the husband has no interest as in the case of the wife's equitable 
 estate the husband is not a necessary party' ; but where she is lej,'a!ly and 
 equitably entitled he is generally made a party for the sake of conformity. 
 Where he has no interest he should be made a party of the third part, 
 and a clause added, " that the said A. B., husband of the party of the first 
 part, is made a party hereto and executes this instrument for the sake of 
 confrtmity." If the husband has any interest in the lands, this will not 
 cctnvty it out of him ; and so it frequently happens that husband and wife 
 are made parties of the first part. The difficulty about this is that the 
 husband might afterwards be estopped from saying he had no interest in 
 the lands so conveyed, and would moreover be consistently obliged to 
 join in the covenants with his wife — a thing to which he may reasonably 
 be supposed to object. As a sort of middle course a clause, may be added 
 to the above, granting to the purchaser all the husband s interest in the 
 lands. 
 
 6. Deeds from husband to xoife and vice versa. 
 
 These conveyances can be done in two ways ; either by a conveyance 
 under the Statute of Uses, where the party of the first part grants to a 
 third party to hold unto, and to the use of the husband or wife, or by two 
 separate instruments. Most conveyancers would prefer the latter mode. 
 
 7. Conveyances by Corporate bodies. 
 
 (See recitals ante and particular statutes as to execution, attestation, 
 registration, etc.^ 
 
 8. Conveyances Under the Mortmain Acts. 
 
 cited 
 23 place 
 
 set out 
 
 The law, as to conveyances of land, or money, or stock to be laid out in 
 land for charitable uses, within the Mortmain Acts, is laid down in the 
 leading case of Corbyn v. French, ' and the following formalities must be 
 attended to : 
 
 1. The conveyance must be by deed, sealed and delivered and executed 
 in the presence of two or more witnesses. 
 
 2. It must be executed twelve calendar months before the death of the 
 grantor. 
 
 3. In England, it must be enrolled in Chancery within six calendar months 
 after execution; but in Ontario, registration is sufficient without enrol- 
 ment in Chancery,! and it was a question if registration even be neces- 
 sary.* 
 
 • Adams V. Loomis, 22 Chy. 99. 
 
 " 4 Ves. 418. (Indermaur Con Cas.) 
 5 Hambly v. Fuller, 22 C. P. 141. 
 
 * Mercer v. Hewston, 9 C. P. 349. 
 
282 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 4. The deed must take effect in possession immediately from the mak- 
 ing \vithout any reservation or limitation for the benefit of the grantor or 
 any person claiming under him.' 
 
 ' The Statute does not apply to pure personalty — stock to be laid out 
 in land must be transferred six months before the death of the grantor. A 
 deed inter vivos is necessary ; a will for the purpose being quite outside the 
 Statute. 
 
CHAPTER V. 
 
 LEASES. 
 
 See R. S. O. cap. 136, as to landlord and tenant ; cap. 137. as to over- 
 holding tenants; cap. 98, sec. 4, requiring written leases to be by deed ; ir 
 Geo. II. cap. 19, as to fraudulent removal of goods from premises, and as 
 to payment of double rent, after the tenant has given notice to (juit ; and 4 
 Geo. II. cap. 28, as to double value, where notice is given by the landlord ; 
 and 32 Henry VIII. cap. 34, as to covenants running with the assignee of 
 the reversion ; 
 
 See, also, 43 Vic. cap. 16 O. as to seizure of the goods of lodgers ; the 
 Judicature Act of 1881, as to set-off against rent ; the Assessment Act R. S. 
 O. cap, 230 and R. S. O. cap. 116, as to covenants being assignable. 
 
 LEASE UNDER THE STATUTE R. S. O. CAP. 103. 
 
 in the year of our 
 in pursuance of the Act 
 
 This Indenture made the day of 
 
 Lord one thousand eight hundred and 
 respecting short forms of leases. 
 
 Between 
 
 of the first part, 
 
 and 
 
 of the second part. 
 
 WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the rents, covenants and agree- 
 ments, hereinafter reserved and contained on the part of the said party of 
 the second part, his executors, administrators and assigns to be paid — 
 observed and performed — the said party of the first part ha demised and 
 leased, and by these present do demise and lease unto the said party 
 of the second part executors, administrators and assigns, all 
 
 that messuage or tenement situate 
 
 To HAVE AND TO HOLD the said demised premises fur and during the 
 term of to be computed from the day of 
 
 one thousand eight hundred and and from thenceforth next 
 
 ensuing and fully to be complete and ended. 
 
 Yielding and paying therefor, yearly, and every year during the said 
 term hereby granted unto the said party of the first part, heirs, execu- 
 tors, administrators or assigns, the sum of to be payable on the 
 following days and times, that is to say, on, etc. ; the first of such pay- 
 
284 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 ments to become due and to be made on the day 
 
 of next. 
 
 And the said party of the second part covenants with the said party of 
 the first part to pay rent ; and to pay taxes ; and to repair ; and to kocp up 
 fences, and not to cut down timl)er ; and that the said party of the first 
 part may enter and view state of repair; and that the said party of the 
 second j)art will repair according to notice ; and will not assij^n or sublet 
 without leave ; and that will leave the premises in goud 
 
 repair. 
 
 Proviso, for re-entry by the said party of the first part on non-payment 
 of rent, or on non-performance of covenants. 
 
 The said party of the first part covenants with the said party of the 
 second part for quiet enjoyment. 
 
 In witness, etc. 
 
 It is usual in all leases to insert a clause, that if the lessee, or his 
 assigns, shall make any assignment for the benefit of creditors, or become 
 bankrupt or insolvent, that the next payment of rent is to become imme- 
 diately due and payable, and that the term should become forfeited and 
 void. 
 
 It is better that the term should be held forfeited or void at the option 
 of the lessor. 
 
 A similar covenant is added as to the interest of the lessee being seized 
 or attached by any creditor. 
 
 Clause as to renewal may be as follows : 
 
 And, also, that immediately after the expiration of the said term of 
 
 years, he, the said party of the first part, 
 his heirs and assigns, shall and will grant another lease of the said 
 hereby demised premises, with the appurtenances, containing the like 
 covenants, conditions, provisoes and agreements as are in this lease 
 contained and expressed, and at and under a certain yearly rent, pay- 
 able in quarterly payments, the amount whereof to be ascertained in man- 
 ner following, that is to say: To be fixed on, and determined upon, and 
 declared by two appraisers, to be named and appointed, one of them by 
 the said party of the first part, his heirs and assigns, the other by the said 
 party of the second part, executors, administrators and assigns, 
 
 with power to them, the said appraisers, to name and call in a third if they 
 cannot agree ; such appraisement to be made within fourteen days after 
 the end of the term hereby granted : such rent to be payable in quarterly 
 payments as aforesaid, and to commence from and immediately after the 
 termination of the first term. 
 
 UNDERLEASE. 
 
 An underlease may be for any term less by one day than the original 
 lease, and the demise clause should be worded accordingly. 
 
PRECKOKNTH, FOHMS AND UKFKHKNlKS. 
 
 2H.- 
 
 party of 
 ki'cp up 
 the Inst 
 y of the 
 f sub-let 
 I in good 
 
 payment 
 ty of the 
 
 Be, or his 
 r become 
 ne imme- 
 eited and 
 
 he option 
 ing seized 
 
 rm of 
 [irst part, 
 the said 
 the like 
 this lease 
 rent, pay- 
 d in man- 
 upon, and 
 them by 
 the said 
 d assigns, 
 ,rd if they 
 ays after 
 quarterly 
 after the 
 
 The covenants should follow those in the orij-inal lease, and any addi- 
 tional ones with the undcrlcssec, as may be agreed upon. 
 
 NOTICE TO yUIT IJY LANDLORD. 
 
 To A. B., or whom else it may concern : 
 
 I iiKKKBY give you notice to quit and deliver up to me, on or before the 
 day of iS the peaceable and (juiet possession 
 
 of the premises you now hold of me, with the appurtenances, situate 
 in the of 
 
 Dated this 
 
 Witness : 
 
 day of 
 
 A.D. i8 
 Yours, etc. 
 
 (Lessor.) 
 
 NOTICE TO QUIT BY TENANT. 
 
 To A. B., Esq. : 
 
 I HiiREiiv give you notice that it is my intention to determine the said 
 lease, and to quit and deliver up on or heft ire the day of 
 
 18 , the possession of the premises now held by me, 
 with the appurtenances, situate at in the township of 
 
 in the county of 
 
 Dated this day of A.D. iH 
 
 Yours, etc.. 
 
 Witness : 
 
 To A. B. 
 
 (Lessee). 
 
 NOTICE TO CLAIM DOUBLE RENT. 
 
 I GIVE you notice that if you do not deliver up possession of the house 
 and premises situate No. in street, in the 
 
 of ■ on the day of according to my 
 
 notice to quit, dated the day of I shall claim from 
 
 you double the yearly value of the premises for so long as you shall keep 
 possession of them after the expiration of the said notice, according to 
 the Statute in such case made and provided. 
 
 e original 
 
 DISTRESS WARRANT. 
 
 To A. B., my bailiff, Greeting. 
 
 Distrain the goods and chattels of the tenant in the house 
 
 he now dwells in or upon the premises in his possession, situated 
 
286 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 for the sum of being the amount of rent due to 
 
 me on the same, on the day of i8 , and for 
 
 your so doing, this shall be your sufficient warrant and authority. 
 
 Dated the day of A.D. 18 
 
 APPRAISERS' OATH. 
 
 You, and each of you, shall well and truly appraise the goods and chat- 
 tels mentioned in 'his inventory, according to the best of your judgment. 
 So help you God. 
 
 INVENTORY. 
 
 An inventory of the several goods and chattels distrained by me 
 
 the day of in the year 18 in the 
 
 ss 
 
 S 
 
 E i 
 
 * S 
 
 
 1^ j& )T» 
 
 situate by 
 
 your landlord, for the sum of 
 rent due to the said 
 
 18 
 
 house, outhouses and lands of 
 authority and on behalf of 
 
 being 
 on the day of 
 
 In the dwelling-house : 
 
 On the premises : 
 
 Mr. Take notice, that as the bailiff to your 
 
 landlord, I have this day distrained on the premises above mentioned, the 
 several goods and chattels specified in the above inventory, for the sum of 
 being rent due to the said 
 
 the day of 18 for 
 
 the said premises ; and that unless you pay the said rent, with the charges 
 of distraining for the same, or replevy within five days from the date 
 hereof, the said goods and chattels will be appraised and sold according 
 to law. 
 
 Given under my hand, the day of A.D. 18 
 
 Witness : 
 
 APPRAISEMENT. 
 
 Mkmoranou.m, that on the day of in the year of 
 
 our Lord 18 , of sworn appraisers, were sworn 
 
 upon the Holy Evangelists, by me of well and 
 
 truly to appraise the goods and chattels mentioned in the inventory, 
 according to the best of your judgment. 
 
 Present at the swearing of 
 the said 
 and witness thereto. 
 
 Constable^ 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 287 
 
 MEMORANDUM TO BE ENDORSED ON THE INVENTORY. 
 
 Memorandum : That on the day of in tlie year 
 
 of our Lord i8 , of , and 
 
 of , were sworn on the Holy Evangelists by me, 
 
 of , constable, truly to appraise the goods and chattels men- 
 
 tioned in this inventory, according to the best of their judgment, As wit- 
 ness my hand. 
 
 {Signatures, etc., as above.) 
 
 BAILIFFS SALE. 
 
 Notice is hereby given, that the cattle, goods and chattels, distrained 
 for rent on the day of i8 , by me 
 
 as bailiff to the landlord of the premises of the 
 
 tenant, will be sold by public auction, on the day of 
 
 1 8 , at o'clock, which cattle, goods and chattels are as fol- 
 
 lows, that is to say : 
 
 day of i8 . 
 
 SURRENDER OF LEASE. 
 
 Where a surrender of a lease is required to be in writing, it must be by 
 deed, and may be conveniently written on the back of the lease intended 
 to be surrendered. No particular form of words is necessary, if the inten- 
 tion can be gathered that the lessee intends to surrender and yield up to 
 the lessor the lease in question, for the unexpired portion of the term. A 
 covenant may be added that the lessee has, in himself, good right, full 
 power, and lawful and absolute authority to surrender and yield up the 
 premises to the lessor. 
 
 le year of 
 
 Ire sworn 
 
 /ell and 
 
 Iventory, 
 
 Istablc. 
 
CHAPTER VI. 
 
 MORTGAGES. 
 
 See R. S. O. cap. gg, as to mortgages of real estate, merger, dis- 
 charges, etc. ; R. S. O. cap. g8, as to Frauds in sales and mortgages ; R. S. 
 O. cap. 104 as to short forms of mortgages; K. S. O. cap. iii, as to dis- 
 charges of mortgages ; 44 Vic. cap. 14 O., as to bar of dower ; 43 Vic. cap. 
 42, D., as to stating the interest in the mortgage ; 42 Vic. cap. 20, O., as to 
 power of sale; 44 Vic. cap. 10. as to discharge of mortgages by married 
 \vomen. 
 
 MORTGAGE OF L.VND UNDER R. S. O. CAP. 104. 
 
 This Indentijre, made (in duplicate) the day of 
 
 A.D. 18 , in pursuance of the Act respecting Short Forms of Mort- 
 gages, Between 
 
 WITNESSETH, that in consideration of of lawful money 
 
 of Canada, now paid by the said mortgagee to the said mortgagor 
 {the icccipt ',vhf;-tuf is hereby ackno7vlcdgcd(, tlie said mortgagor do 
 grant and mortgage unto the said mortgagee heirs and assigns 
 
 forever : 
 
 All and singular, th certain parcel or tract of land and premises 
 
 Provided this mortgage to be void on payment of of lawful 
 
 money of Canada, with interest at per cent, per annum, as 
 
 follows : and taxes and performance of statute labour. 
 
 The said mortgagor covenant with the said mortgagee that 
 the mortgagor will pay the mortgage money and interest, and observe the 
 above proviso ; 
 
 That the mortgagor ha a good title in fee simple to the said 
 lands ; apd that he ha the right to convey the said lands to the said 
 mortgagee and that on default the mortgagee shall have 
 
 quiet possession of the said lands, free from all encumbrances. And that 
 the said mortgagor will execute such further assurances of the said 
 lands as may be requisite. 
 
 And also, that the said mortgagor will produce the title deeds 
 enumerated hereunder, and allow copies to be made at the expense of the 
 mortgagee. 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 289 
 
 And that the said mortgagor ha done no act to incumber the said 
 lands; and that the said mortga!,'or will insure the building on tno 
 said lands to the amount of not less than currency ; and the said 
 
 mortgagor do release to the said mortgagee all claim* 
 
 upon the said lands, subject to the said proviso : 
 
 Provided that the said mortgagee on default of payment for 
 month may enter on, and lease, or sell the said lands : 
 
 Provided that the mortgagee may distrain for arrears of interest ; 
 provided that in default of the payment of the interest hereby secured, 
 the principal hereby secured shall become payable; provided that until 
 default of payment the mortgagor shall have quiet possession of the 
 said lands. 
 
 And the said A. B., wife of the said mortgagor, hereby bars her dower 
 in the said lands. 
 
 In witness whereof, the said parties hereto, have hereunto set their 
 hands and seals. 
 
 MORTGAGE OF LEASEHOLDS. 
 
 Lf lawful 
 linum, as 
 
 that 
 kerve the 
 
 Ithe said 
 I the said 
 lall have 
 \.nd that 
 Ithe said 
 
 Be deeds 
 Leof the 
 
 Mortgage of leaseholds should recite the lease and the agreement for 
 the loan, and .should then assign the land contained in t.ie leis^ to tlie 
 mortgagee, subject to the repayment, as in other morti,ng.js. Similar 
 covenants are entered into, as in the case of the assignment of a lease, and 
 the ordinary covenants in a mortgage. It is apprehended that nothing 
 will be gained by making a mortgage of a lease in pur.suani-.e of the Act 
 respecting Short Forms of Mortgages, if that Act applies only to freahold 
 mortgages. 
 
 This Indenture, made the day of , i8 , between 
 
 A. B., of, etc., of the one part, and C. D., of, etc., of the other part ; 
 Whereas by an indenture, dated the day of , i8 , and 
 
 made between (lessor) of the one part, and (lessee) of the other part, fur 
 the considerations therein mentioned, all (copy parcels from lease verbatim)^ 
 with the appurtenances, were demised unto the said (lessee), his executors, 
 administrators and assigns, from the day of then last, f.ir 
 
 years, at the yearly rent of % , and subject to the covenants 
 
 and agreements therein contained ; and whereas by divers mesne assign- 
 ments, and ultimately by an indenture, dated the day of 
 i8 , and made between of the one part, and the said .\. 13., 
 of the other part, the said piece or parcel of ground, with the 
 messuages or tenements thereon erected, and then known as Nos. 
 and in aforesaid, became vested in the said A. B., 
 his executors, administrators and assigns, for all the residue of the term 
 therein, subject to the payment of the rent re.served by and to the per- 
 formance of the! covenants and agr"ements contained in the said indenture 
 of lease; and whereas the said C. D. hath agreed to advance the sail 
 A. B. 9 on having the same with interest secured in manner here- 
 inafter appearing ; 
 
 o's.c. 19 
 
290 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 Now, this indenture witnesseth, that, in consideration of • on the 
 
 execution hereof paid by the said C. D. to the said A. B., the receipt of 
 which sum is hereby acknowledged, he, the said A. B.. doih by these 
 presents assign unto tlie said C D., his executors, administrators and 
 assigns, all that the piece or parcel of ground comprised in and demised 
 by the hereinbefore-recited indenture of lease, together with the messuages 
 or tenements thereon erected and built, and which are now known and 
 distinguished as and in aforesaid, and now or late 
 
 in th'i occupation of and , and all other the messuages or 
 
 tenements and buildings erected or standing on the said pie;e or parcel of 
 ground in and demised by the hereinbefore-recited indenture of lease, 
 with the easements and appurtenances thereto belonging or enjoyed there- 
 with, To hold the said premises with their appurtenances, unto the said 
 C. D., his executors, administrators and assigns, henceforth for all the 
 remainder of the said term of years grantetl by the hereinbefore- 
 
 recited indenture of lease . 
 
 Provided always, that if the said A. !'>., his executors, administrators or 
 assigns, shall on or before the day of next pay unto the 
 
 said C. D., his executors, administrators or assigns, the sum of 9 
 together with interest for the same in the meantime, after the rate of 
 per cent, per annum, without any deduction, then the said C. D., his exe- 
 cutors, administrators or assigns, will thereupon, at the request and costs 
 of the said A. B., his executors, administrators or assigns, reassign the 
 said premises unto the said A. B., his executors, administrators or assigns, 
 or as he or they may direct ; 
 
 Provided also, that if default shall bo made in such paym;nt, it shall be 
 lawful for the said C. D., his executors, administrators or assigns, at any 
 time thereafter, without any further consent on the part of the said A. 11, 
 his executors, administrators or assigns, to sell the premises hereby 
 assigned, or any part thereof, either together or in parcels, and cither by 
 public auction or private c:)ntract, and subject to such conditions of sale 
 and generally in every respect as the said C. D., his executors, adminis 
 trators or assigns shall deem fit, with power to buy in the same at any 
 auction, or rescind any contract for sale of the same, and to resell the 
 same from time to time in manner aforesaid, without being responsible for 
 any loss occasioned thereby, and upon any such sale to assign the premises 
 sold unto the purchaser or purchasers, his or their executors, administra- 
 tors and assigns, or as he or they may require : and it is hereby declared 
 that the said C. D., his executors, administrators And assigns, shall stand 
 possessed of the monies to arise from any such sale, upon trust, in the 
 lirst place to pay the costs, charges and expenses of and incidental to sucii 
 sale and the carrying the contract thereof into < uplete execution, and in 
 the next place upon trust to repay himself and themselves all and every 
 such sum or sums of money as may then be due or owing to him or them 
 under or by virtue of this security, and to pay the surplus (if any) of the 
 monies arising from such sale unto the said A. B.. his executors, adminis- 
 trators or assigns : And it is hereby declared, that every receipt which 
 shall be given by the said C. D., his executors, administrators or assigns, 
 for any purchase or other monies to be derived from any such sale oi 
 
 ft 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 291 
 
 on the 
 
 jceipt of 
 )y these 
 :ors and 
 demised 
 essuages 
 own and 
 ,• or late 
 lUages or 
 parcel of 
 of lease, 
 ed there- 
 ) the said 
 01- all the 
 einbefore- 
 
 itvators or 
 y' unto the 
 
 ite of 
 
 0., his exe- 
 
 t and costs 
 
 eassign the 
 
 or assigns, 
 
 , it shall be 
 ^'ns, at any 
 said A. 1^., 
 ses hereby 
 either by 
 .ons of sale 
 s, adminis 
 ime at any 
 resell the 
 lonsible for 
 le premises 
 ladministra- 
 ly declared 
 shall stand 
 ;rust, in the 
 ital to such 
 ;ion, and in 
 |1 and every 
 lim or them 
 [any) of the 
 Irs. adminis- 
 ;eipt which 
 or assigns, 
 luch sale oi 
 
 sales, or otherwise under these presents, shall be an effectual discharge to 
 the person or persons to whom such receipt or receipts shall be given for 
 the money therein acknowledged to be received ; and that the person or 
 persons taking such receipt shall not be answerable or accountable for the 
 misapplication or non-application of the money therein mentioned to be 
 received : And the said A. B. doth hereby for himself, his heirs, executors 
 and administrators, covenant with the said C. D., his executors, adminis- 
 trators and assigns, as follows, namely, that he the said A. B., his execu- 
 tors or administrators, will on or before the day of next 
 pay unto the said C. D., his executors, administrators or assigns, the sum 
 of 9 together with interest for the same in the meantime 
 after the rate of per cent, per annum, without any deduction ; and 
 also, that at the time of the execution h reof the said indenture of lease 
 is a good, valid and subsisting lease, and mt forfeited or surrendered ; and 
 that all and every the covenants therein contained, and on the part of the 
 lessee, his executors, administrators or assigns to be observed or per- 
 formed, have been observed and performed up to the date hereof; and 
 also, that he the said A. B. now hath in himself good right to assign the 
 said premises unto the said C. D., his executors, administrators and 
 assigns, in manner aforesaid free from all incumbrances ; and also, that 
 the said A. IJ., his executors or administrators, and all other persons 
 having or claiming any estate, or interest in, or out of the said premises, 
 will at all times hereafter at the request of the said C. D., his executors, 
 administrators or assigns, but at the costs of the said A. B., his executors, 
 administrators or assigns, exec.te every such further assurance for better 
 assurmg the said premises unto the said C. D., his executors, administra- 
 tors and assigns, as he or they shall require ; and also will from time to 
 time and at all times hereafter, so long as any moniiy shall remain due on 
 the security of thes(» presents, perform and observe the covenants (and 
 particularly the covenant for insurance against loss or damage by fire) 
 contamed in the hereinbefore-recited indenture of lease, and on the part 
 of the lessee, his executors, adminifitrators or assigns, to be observed or 
 performed, and keep the said C. D., his executors, administrators and 
 assigns indemnified from and against any breach of the same ; and also 
 will at the request of the said C. D., his executors, administrators or 
 assigns, produce to him or them from time to time the receipt for the 
 premiums and duty payable on such insurance for the current year. 
 
 In witness, etc. 
 
 NOTICE OF SALE. 
 {42 Vic. cap. 20, Ontario). 
 To 
 
 c 
 
 In the matter of the sale of lot under " An Act 
 
 to give to mortgagees certain powers now commonly inserted in mort- 
 gages." 
 
 I, hereby require you on or before the 
 
 day of 18 , to pay off the principal money and interest 
 
 secured by a certain indenture of mortgage, dated the day 
 
292 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCII^O. 
 
 of 1 8 , and expressed to be made between 
 
 on all th which said mortgage was registered in the registry office 
 
 for the on the day of i8 , under 
 
 the number , and has since become the property of the undersigned. 
 
 And I hereby give you noiice that the amount due on the said mort- 
 gage for principal, interest and costs respectively, is as follows : 
 
 And unless the said principal money and interest and costs are paid on 
 or before the said day of 18 , I shall sell the 
 
 said property, comprised in the said indenture (and above described), under 
 the authority of the Act entitled " An Act to give to mortgagees certain 
 powers, now commonly inserted in mortgages," at 
 
 Dated at 
 
 the 
 
 day of 
 
 18 
 
 Witness : 
 
 SHORT NOTICE OF SALE BY MORTGAGEE. 
 
 To Mr. 
 
 and whom else it may concern : 
 
 I hereby request payment of the sum of 9 , with interest 
 
 thereon, from the day of last, owing to 
 
 me by virtue of the indenture of mortgage executed by you, bearing dale, 
 the day of i8 ; and I hereby give you 
 
 notice, that unless the same be paid within calendar months 
 
 from the delivery hereof, I shall proceed to a sale of the and 
 
 hereditaments in the said indenture compri;>ed, in execution of the power 
 thereby vested in me. 
 
 Dated this 
 
 day of 
 
 18 
 
 DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE. 
 
 {Statutory). 
 
 Province of Ontario, 
 
 To WIT 
 
 Dominion of Canada. 
 
 To THE Registrar of the Jo certify that 
 
 ha satisfied all money due on, or to grow due on a 
 
 certain mortgage made by which mortgage bears date the 
 
 day of A. D. 18 , and was regi itered 
 
 in the registry office for the on the day of 
 
 A.D. 18 , at minutes past o'clock 
 
 noon, in Liber for as No. and that 
 
 such mortgage has been assigned {Here state whether murt<{<ige 
 
istry office 
 i , under 
 idersigned. 
 
 said mort- 
 
 re paid on 
 all sell the 
 ed), under 
 ;es certain 
 
 PRECEDENTS. FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 298 
 
 <issi{r,icd ornot.) And that T am tu^ 
 
 Witness my hand this 
 VVitness ; 
 
 day of 
 
 A.D. i8 
 
 cai^iroVt't heatl"'aVd%?are^S^ "S^' °^ '""^ ^-^^ --tgaged it 
 
 of releasing them only \ orm^l he discharge is to operate to the extent 
 
 moregagedWmisesis'also uiTfirs^r^U'^ "''"'^ ''' ^^'' °^ »»>« 
 
 {Ordinary affidavit of execution). 
 
 m 
 
 th interest 
 
 t, owing to 
 iring date, 
 y give you 
 ar months 
 and 
 the power 
 
 a 
 
 s date the 
 regi .tered 
 
 and that 
 
CHAPTER VII. 
 
 ASSIGNMENTS. 
 
 See 32 Henry VIII. cap. 34, as to assignment of covenants in leases ; R. 
 S. O. cap. 116, as to this, and as to choses in action ; also, 44 Vic. cap. $, 
 sec. 17. 
 
 I. GENERAL FORM OF ASSIGNMENT BY ENDORSEMENT. 
 
 Know all men by these presents, that I, the within named A. B., 
 in consideration of $ to me paid by C. D., have assigned to 
 
 the said C. D. and his assigns, all my interest in the within-written instru- 
 ment, and every clause, article, or thing therein contained ; and I do here- 
 by constitute the said C. D. my attorney, in my name, but to his own use, 
 to take all legal measures which may be proper for the complete recovery 
 and enjoyment of the assigned premises, with power of substitution. 
 
 In witness, etc. 
 
 2. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASEHOLDS. 
 
 This Indenture, made the day of 
 
 18 , between (vendor), of etc., of the one part, and (purchaser), of etc.. 
 of the other part : Whereas, by an indenture bearing date the 
 day of 18 , and made between (lessor) of the one part, and 
 
 (lessee) of the other part, for the considerations therein mentioned the said 
 (lessor) did demise unto the said (lessee) his executors, admmistrators and 
 assigns, all (here copy the parcels from the lease verbatim), with their rights, 
 casements and appurtenances. To hold the same unto the said (lessee), 
 his executors, administrators and assigns, for the term of 
 years, at and under the yearly rent of $ , and subject to the 
 
 covenants therein contained, and on the part of the (lessee), his executors, 
 administrators and assigns, to be observed and performed : And 
 
 Whereas, by virtue of divers assignments and other Acts in the law, 
 and ultimately by an indenture bearing date the day of 
 
 , and made between A. B., of the one part, and the said 
 (vendor) of the other part, the premises comprised in and demised by the 
 hereinbefore recited indenture, have become vested in the said (vendor), 
 for the residue of the said term of years therein, subject to 
 
 the payment of the rent of 9 reserved by and to the perform- 
 
sases ; R. 
 c. cap. 5» 
 
 MENT. 
 
 ed A. B., 
 
 ssigned to 
 en jnstru- 
 t do here- 
 1 own use, 
 recovery 
 ion. 
 
 PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 295 
 
 , of etc., 
 
 sart, and 
 d the said 
 ators and 
 eir rights, 
 id (lessee)^ 
 
 ect to the 
 executors, 
 
 the law, 
 day of 
 d the said 
 ed by the 
 [vctidor), 
 ubject to 
 perform- 
 
 ance of the covenants and conditions contained in the said indenture, and 
 on the part of the lessee, his executors, administrators and assigns, to be 
 observed and performed : And 
 
 Whereas, the said (vendor) hath contracted with the said (purchaser) 
 for the sale to him of the premises hereinbefore described, and intended 
 to be hereby assigned for the residue of the term therein, subject to the 
 payment of the rent reserved by and to the performance of the covenant* 
 contained in the said lease, but free from all other incumbrances, for the 
 sum of 9 
 
 Now, this indenture witnesseth, that in consideration of i 
 to the said (vendor) paid by the said (purchaser) on the execution hereof, 
 (the receipt whereof, and that the same is in full for the purchase of the K.iid 
 premises, the said(vcndor)doth hereby acknowledge and declare), he, the said 
 (vendor), doth, by these presents, assign unto the said (purchaser), his 
 executors, administrators and assigns, all and singular the messuages or 
 tenements, and all other the premises comprised in and demised by the 
 hereinbefore recited lease, to hold the said premises unto the said ( pur- 
 chaser), his executors, administrators and assigns, henceforth for all the 
 residue of the term of years therein, subject to the payment 
 
 of the rent of 9 reserved by and to the performance of 
 
 the covenants contained in the hereinbefore recited lease, and which 
 from and after the day of last, are, or ought to 
 
 paid, observed and performed : 
 
 And the said (vendor) doth hereby for himself, his heirs, executors and 
 administrators, covenant with the said (purchaser), his executors, adminis- 
 trators and assigns, that (notwithstanding any act or thing by the said (ven- 
 dor), or any person claiming, through, under, or in trust for him), the said 
 lease is now a good, valid and subsisting lease, unforfeited and unsurren- 
 dered, and in nowise become void or voidable. 
 
 And that the rent thereby reserved, and the covenants therein contained, 
 have been paid, observed and performed up to the day 
 
 of last ; and also that the saivl (vendor) now hath good 
 
 right to assign the said lease, and the premises thereby demised, for the 
 term and in manner aforesaid, free from incumbrances ; 
 
 And, al.so, that the said (vendor), and any person claiming as aforesaid, 
 will at all times during the continuancj of the said lease, at the request 
 and costs of the said (purchaser), his executors, administrators or assigns, 
 make and execute all such further and other acts and assurances for 
 further and better assuring the said premises unto the said (purchaser), his 
 executors, administrators and assigns, for the term and in manner afore- 
 said, as the said (^Kr<:Arts<?r), his executors, administrators or assigns, shall 
 reasonably requue : 
 
 And the said (purchaser), doth hereby for himself, his heirs, executors, 
 administrators and asssgns, covenant with the said (vendor), his executors 
 and administrators, that he. the said (purchaser), his executors, adminis- 
 trators or assigns, will, at all times hereafter during the residue of the 
 term for which the said premises are holden, pay the rent of 9 
 reserved by, and perform the covenants contained in the hereinbefore 
 
2<)() 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 recited lease, and which, from and after the day of 
 
 last, are, or ought to be paid, observed or performed ; and will, in the 
 meantime, keep indemnified the said (vendor), his heirs, executors and 
 administrators, from and against the non-payment of the said rent, and 
 the non-observance or non-performance of the said covenants, or any 
 of them. 
 
 In witness, etc. 
 
 Ik^sides the recital of the lease, the contract for sale is sometimes men- 
 tioned. Where the right to assign is not apparent, a covenant for right 
 to convey is added, and also that the assignee will enjoy the premises 
 free from all encumbrances, except the rent and covenants. 
 
 3. ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 An assignment of a mortgage sets out the original mortgage, the state of 
 the mortgage debt, and the a;;reement for the transfer. It should assign 
 the land as well as the debt and that the mortgagee did no act to encum- 
 ber, and where obtainable, a covenant from him to pay the debt if the 
 mortgagor does not pay it. 
 
 This indenture made the day of 1 18 , Between E. F., 
 
 of, etc. (hereinafter called the assignor,) of the first part ; and G. H., of, 
 etc. (hereinafter called the assignee), of the second part, Whereas, by 
 indenture of mortgage, bearing date the day of , 18 , made 
 
 between one A. B., of, etc., of the first part; C. D. (wife of the said A. B., 
 and for the purpose of barring her dower), of the second part ; and the 
 said E. F., of the third part; the said A. B. did convey and assure the 
 lands and premises hereinafter described, unto the said E. F., his heirs, 
 executors, administrators and assigns, subject to a proviso for redemption 
 on payment of $ , and interest thereon, at the rate of per cent, 
 
 per annum, on the days and times, and in the manner, in the said inden- 
 ture of mortgage mentioned. And whereas, there is now due upon the 
 said mortgage, for principal money, the sum of $ ; and for interest, the 
 sum of $ . Now, this indenture witnesseth, that, in considera- 
 
 tion oi the sum of $ , of lawful money of Canada, now paid by 
 
 the said assignee to the said assignor, the receipt whereof is hereby 
 acknowledged, he, the said assignor, doth hereby grant, assign, and 
 transfer unto the said assignee, his heirs, executors, administrators, 
 and assigns, the said indenture of mortgage, and the principal and 
 interest moneys thereby secured, and the lands and premises thereby con- 
 veyed to wit ; All and singular {here describe the premises), to have, hold, 
 receive and take, the said indenture of mortgage, and the principal and 
 interest moneys thereby secured, and the lands and premises thereby con- 
 veyed unto the said assignee, his heirs, executors, administrators and 
 assigns, to and for his and their sole and only use : subject, nevertheless, 
 to the proviso for redemption in the siid mortgage contained. And, 
 for the better enabling the said assignee, his executors, administrators and 
 assigns, to recover and receive the said principal moneys and interest. 
 
PRECEDENTS, FOKMS AND REFERENCKfl. 
 
 297 
 
 from the said A, B., his executors or administrators, he, the said assiRnor. 
 doth hereby nominate and appoint the sai(i assi^'nce, his executors, admin- 
 istrators and assigns, to be the true and lawful attorney and attorneys of 
 him, the said assignor, his executors or administrators, for him, the 
 said assign- r, his executors or administrators, and in his, or their, 
 names or name, but at the cost and charges of tlie assignee, his executors, 
 administrators or assigns, to sue for and recover the said principal moneys 
 and interr>st, in any court of law or equity ; and on receipt or recovery, to 
 give good and sufficient discharges ; and generally to do, and execute, all 
 such acts, deeds, matters and things, as may be requisite and necessary, 
 for the rpcovery of the said mortgage money and interest. And the said 
 assignor doth hereby for himself, his heirs, executors and administrators, 
 covenant, promis: and agree, to and witli the said assignee, his executors, 
 administrators and assigns, that the said indenture of mortgage is a 
 good, valid and subsisting security, free from all incumbrances, and not 
 discharged or released, and that the principal moneys and interest herein- 
 before mentioned, are now justly due and owing upon the security of the 
 said mortgage; and that the said assignor has good rights to assign and 
 transfer the said mortgage ; and will not at any time hereafter release or 
 discharge the same, without the consent of the said assignee, his execu- 
 tors, administrators or assigns ; and that the said assignor, his heirs, 
 executors or administrators, will at all times, on the request, but at the 
 costs and charges of the assignee, his executors administrators and assigns, 
 execute such further assignments or assurances of the said indenture, and 
 the moneys thereby secured, and the lands therein comprised, as may be 
 necessary ; and the said assignee doth hereby, for himself, his executors, 
 administrators and assigns, covenant, promise and agree, to and with the 
 assignor, his heirs, executors and administrators, that he the said assignee, 
 his executors or administrators, in case he or they shall act upon the 
 power of attorney, hereinbefore contained, will save harmless, and indem- 
 nify the said assignor, his heirs, executors and administrators, of and from 
 all costs, charges and expenses, to which he or they may become liable , 
 or be put unto, in consequence thereof. 
 
 In witness, etc. 
 
 4. ASSIGNMENT OF CHATTEL MORTGAGE. 
 
 (See R. S. 0. cap. 119.; 
 
 (Recite chattel mortgaf^e to the end of mode of payment, also the state of 
 the mortgage debt, and the agreement for the assignment in question, and, as 
 in the case af other assignments, convey the goods and chattels as well as the 
 mortgage debt, subject to the proviso fur redemption. Covenants are added 
 that there is a debt due to the assignor ; that he has done no act to impair the 
 security ; and for further assurances. 
 
298 
 
 PllACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 00 
 
 0? 
 
 i I 
 
 6 
 
 II 
 
 
 5. ASSIGNMENT OF CHOSE IN ACTION. 
 
 {By Deed.) 
 
 This Indenture made, etc. 
 
 Whereas, {Recite the subject matter of the triimfer that the debt is unpaid 
 and the agreement for the sale to the assignee ) 
 
 Testatum and receipt clause ; the party of the first part doth grant and 
 assign unto the party of the second part. 
 
 All that said and all and every sum and sums of money 
 
 now due and owing on the said and the full benefit 
 
 thereof. 
 
 Together with full power and authority {power of attorney to lake alt 
 necessary steps to secure and recover the premises assigned, etc. But this 
 would seem to be unnecessary under R. S. O. cap. ii6,) 
 
 Covenants. — And the said doth hereby for himself and 
 
 his heirs, covenant with the said that for and notwithstanding 
 
 anything by him, the said done or suffered, or to which he 
 
 has been party or privy, the said is in full force and effect uncancelled and 
 entirely unsatisfied. 
 
 And that, notwithstanding any such thing as aforesaid, he, the said 
 now hath full power and authority to assign the premises 
 hereby assigned in manner aforesaid, and according to the true intent and 
 mtianing of these presents. 
 
 And that, notwithstanding any such thing as afort;said, it shall be lawful 
 for the said and his assigns, peaceably and quietly, to take, 
 
 recover and enjoy the said premises at all times hereafter, without any 
 interruption or disturbance. 
 
 And, that free from encumbrance. And further, that, notwithstanding 
 any such thing as aforesaid, he, the said shall and will, at all 
 
 times hereinafter, upon every request, and at the costs and charges of the 
 said and his assigns, make and do all such further and rea- 
 
 sonable acts and things for the more effectually assuring the premises to 
 the said and his assigns in manner aforesaid, as by the said 
 
 and his assigns may be required 
 In witness, etc. 
 
 6. COPYRIGHTS. 
 
 {See Copyright Act of 1875. 38 Vic. cap. 88.) 
 
 An application for the registration of a Copyright, if made by the Proprietor 
 himself, shall be made after the following form : 
 
 To the Minister of Agriculture, 
 
 {Copyright Branch) Ottawa. 
 
 I {name of person) domiciled in Canada {state the place and province), or 
 in any other part of the British Possessions {slate the place), or being a citi- 
 
I unpaid 
 
 rant and 
 
 if money 
 t benefit 
 
 lake all 
 But this 
 
 jself and 
 [.standing 
 which he 
 elled and 
 
 the said 
 
 premises 
 
 ntent and 
 
 be lawful 
 , to take, 
 hout any 
 
 islanding 
 nil. at all 
 tes of the 
 
 and rea- 
 jmises to 
 
 the said 
 
 PRECEDKNTB, FOUMH AND BEKEBENtlKS. 
 
 20i) 
 
 Proprietor 
 
 ten of any Country, (state the Country), having an International Copyright 
 treaty with the United Kingdom, as the case may be) hereby declare that I 
 am the proprietor of the (book, map, chart, etc., etc., as the case may be). 
 called (title or name, as the case may he) and that the said (book, map, etc.. 
 as the case may be) has been pnblishcd in Canada by (m(I»i«' of the pub- 
 lisher thereof), in the (name of the locality where the publication has taken 
 place) in the Province of (Quebec. Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, etc., as the 
 case may be), and hereby request the rcRistration of the same, and for that 
 purpose I herewith forward the fi:e recjuired by the Copyright Act of 1875 
 together with two copies of the (book, map, chart, etc., as the case may be ; if 
 the object is a painting, a sculpture, or any other work of art. a written des- 
 tription of such work of art.) 
 
 In testimony thereof, I have signed in the presence of the two under- 
 signed witnesses at the place and date hereunder mentioned. 
 
 (Place and date.) 
 
 Signature of the two jvitnesses. ) 
 
 (Signature of the Proprietor.) 
 
 i 
 
 7. INTERIM CUrVRIGHT. 
 
 An application for the registration of an Interim Copyright, ;/ made by 
 the proprietor himself, shall be made after the following form : — 
 
 To the Minister of Agriculture, 
 (Copyright Branch.) 
 Ottawa. 
 
 I (name of person), domiciled in Canada, (state the place and Province), or 
 in any other part of the British Possessions (state the place), or being a citi- 
 sen of any country (state the country), having an International Copyright 
 treaty with the United Kingdom, as the case may be) hereby declare that I 
 am the proprietor of a (book, map, chart, etc., as the case may be) caUal 
 (title or name, as the case may be), for which I hereby request the privilege 
 of an Interim Copyright, to the terms of the Ac;, and for that purpose, I 
 herewith forward the fee recjuired by " Thf Cf)pyright Act of 1875," 
 together with a Copy of the title of the said (book, map, chart, etc., as the 
 cetse may be.) 
 
 In testimony thereof I have signed in the presence of the two under- 
 signed witne.sses, at the place and date herewith mentioned. 
 
 (Place and date.) 
 
 Signature of the two witnesses. ] 
 
 (Signature of the Proprietor.) 
 
 I 
 
 pviM«). or 
 ing a citi- 
 
800 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 J 
 
 ■ J 
 
 / 
 
 «. OF AN ENTIRE INTEREST (OR AN UNDIVIDED ONE-HALF 
 
 INTEREST) IN AN INVENTION BEFORE THE 
 
 ISSUE OF PATENT. 
 
 (See Patent Act of 1872, 35 Vic. cap. 26 D.) 
 
 In consideration of the sum of to me paid by 
 
 of the I do hereby sell and assign to the said 
 
 all (or an undivided half of all) my right, title and interest in and to 
 my invention for new and useful improvements on as 
 
 fully set forth and described in the specification which I have signed pre- 
 paratory to obtaining a patent. And I do hereby authorize and request 
 the Commissioner of Patents to issue the said patent to the said 
 
 (or jointly to myself and the said ) in accordance with 
 
 this assignment. 
 
 Witness my hand and seal this day of 
 
 eight hundred and at the 
 
 one thousand 
 
 [L.S.] 
 
 9. OF AN ENTIRE INTEREST IN A PATENT. 
 
 In consideration of to me paid by 
 
 of I do hereby sell and assign to the said 
 
 all my right, title and interest in and to the Patent of Canada, No. 
 for an improvement in granted to me 
 
 the same to be held by and enjoyed by the said to 
 
 the full end of the term for which said patent is granted, as fully and 
 entirely as the same could be held and enjoyed by me if this assignment 
 and sale had not been made. 
 
 Witness my hand and seal this day of 
 
 eight hundred and at 
 
 one thousand 
 
 [L.S.J 
 
 10. FORM OF SURRENDER TO BE WRITTEN ON THE 
 ORIGINAL PATENT. 
 
 To all whom these presents shall come, 
 in the Province of 
 named, sends greeting : — 
 
 of the 
 
 of 
 within 
 
 Wheueas the within written patent, for an improvement on is 
 
 deemed defective or inoperative by reason of insufficient description or 
 specification, and the error arose from inadvertence, accident or mistake, 
 without any fraudulent or deceptive intention, and the Commissioner of 
 Patents, accordingly, in pursuance of the Statute in such respect, bath 
 agreed to accept a surrender of the same. 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 801 
 
 Now know ye that the said within named, doth, by 
 
 these presents, surrender and yield up the within written patent, granted 
 
 to him, for improvements on 
 i8 . 
 
 In witness whereof the said 
 his seal, this day of 
 
 and bearing date the day of 
 
 hath set his hand and affixed 
 
 A.D.. i8 
 
 [L.S.] 
 
 THE 
 
 11. TRADE MARKS. 
 
 See as to Trade Marks and Industrial Designs 42 Vic. cap. 22 O. 
 
 An application for the registration of a GeneralTra.de Mark shall be made 
 in duplicate after the following form : — 
 
 To the Minister of Agriculture, 
 
 {Trade Mark and Copyright Branch,) 
 Ottawa. 
 
 I {name of person), of the {city, town, or other locality, as the case may be), 
 in (name of County, Province or State, as the case may be,) hereby furnish 
 a duplicate copy of a general trade mark, in accordance with sections g 
 and 10 of ■* The Trade Mark and Design Act of 1879," which I verily 
 believe is mine, on account of having been the first to make use of the 
 same {or on account of having acquired it from {naming the person), whom I 
 verily believe to be the original proprietor thereof.) 
 
 The said general trade mark consists {here must be inserted a description 
 efthe trade mark, recital of the motto or mottoes, etc., etc., in order to explain 
 the pattern furnished), and I hereby request the sa.\A general trade mark to 
 be registered in accordance with the law. 
 
 I forward, herewith, the fee of 830, in accordance with section 12 of the 
 said Act. 
 
 In testimony thereof, I have signed in the presence of the two under- 
 signed witnesses, at the place and date hereunder mentioned. 
 
 {Place and date). 
 
 (Signature of the proprietor.) 
 (Signature of the two witnesses.) \ 
 
 ) 
 
 of 
 within 
 
 is 
 
 jtion or 
 Imistake, 
 
 sioner of 
 let, bath 
 
 12. INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS. 
 
 An application for the registration of an Industrial Design shall be made 
 in duplicate after the following form : — 
 
 To the Minister of Agriculture, 
 
 (Trade Mark and Copyright Branch), 
 Ottawa, 
 
 I (name of the person), bemg a resident of Canada, and now residing in 
 the (city, town, or other locality, as the case may be,) in the (name of the 
 
 ;l 
 
302 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 Province, as the case may be,) hereby declare that I am the proprietor of 
 the industrial design of which duplicate copies are herewith forwarded, 
 ami which consists {here insert a description of the design, and an explana- 
 tion of its use,) and I hereby request that the said industrial design be 
 registered in accordance with the law. 
 
 I forward herewith the fee of $5, in accordance with section 36 of " The 
 Trade Mark and Design Act of 1879." 
 
 In testimony thereof. I have signed, in the presence of the two under- 
 signed witnesses, at the place and date hereunder mentioned. 
 
 {Place and dale.) 
 
 {Signature 0/ the two witnesses.) \ 
 
 i 
 
 {Signature 0/ the proprietor.) 
 
 13. TIMBER MARKS. 
 
 (See 33 Vic. cap. 36, as to Marking of Timber.) 
 
 An application for the registration of a Timber Mark or Marks shall be 
 made in duplicate after the following form : — 
 
 To the Minister of Agriculture, 
 
 {Trade Mark and Copyright Branch.) 
 Ottawa. 
 
 I {name of person or firm), of {residence,) engaged in the business of 
 lumbering {or getting out timber and floating or rafting the same,) within 
 the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec, hereby request the registration of 
 the accompanying Timber Mark {or Marks) which I {name of person or 
 firm) declare was not in use, to my knowledge, by any other person than 
 myself at the time of my adoption thereof, and of which the following are 
 a description and drawing {or impression) in duplicate. 
 
 I herewith forward the fee of ^2 required by the "Act respecting the 
 Marking of Timber." 
 
 In testimony thereof I have signed this application in the presence of 
 the two undersigned witnesses, at the place and date hereunder mentioned. 
 
 {Place and date.) 
 
 {Signature of the proprietor.) 
 {Signature of the two witnesses.) \ 
 
CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 PERSONAL PEOPERTY. 
 
 As to sales of goods between the parties, see 29 Car. II. cap. 3, sec. 17, 
 Lord Tenterden's Act, 9 Geo. IV. cap. 14, R. S. O. cap. 117. 
 
 I. GIFT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY (CHOSES IN POSSESSION.) 
 
 This Indenture made between A., of 
 
 the one part, and B., of the other part. 
 
 Whereas (setting out the reason and reality of the gift). 
 
 Now, this indenture witnesseth, that in pursuance of his said desire, and 
 in consideration of his natural love and affection for the said B., he, the 
 said A., doth hereby give and assign unto the said B., 
 
 All and every the goods, chattels and cfiecls in the schedule hereunto 
 annexed, marked A. 
 
 Together with full power and authority for the said B. and his assigns, 
 to enter into and upon any dwelling house, lands and hereditaments, for 
 the time being, belonging to or occupied In- the said A., in or upon which 
 any property comprised in or assigned by this indenture, shall be, or be 
 supposed to be, and stay therein or upon, and return therefrom to inspect 
 and take an inventory or inventories of the properties and effects hereby 
 assigned, and to remove the same at his or their pleasure. 
 
 And, the said A. doth hereby, for himself and his heirs, covenant with 
 the said B., that he, the said A., hath full power to a-:sign and give the said 
 goods and chattels hereby assigned in manner aforesaid. 
 
 And that it shall be lawful for the said B. and his assigns to take hold 
 and enjoy the same free from any disturbance or hindrance whatever, and 
 that free from any encumbrance. 
 
 In witness, etc. 
 
 2. SALE OF GOODS. 
 
 Memorandum of agreement between A., of 
 and B., of of the other part. 
 
 of the one part. 
 
804 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 The said A. agrees to sell, and the said B. agrees to buy, the goods here- 
 under mentioned, the property of said A., for the price or sum of J 
 
 Signed, A. 
 Signed, B. 
 Schedule. 
 
 or 
 To buy six hogsheads of sugar, the property of the said A., now lying in 
 bond at in the name of the said A., for the sum of J 
 
 To be delivered within three months, on tender of the price and duty. 
 
 Signed, A. 
 Signed, B. 
 
 CONVEYANCES UNDER THE REVISED STATUTE. 
 
 See R. S. O. cap. rig; 41 Vic. cap. 8; 43 Vic. cap. 15; 44 Vic. cap. 12 
 — all amending the Revised Statute. 
 
 I. BILL OF SALE OF CHATTELS. 
 
 This Indenture, etc., 
 between bargainor, and bargainee : 
 
 Whereas the said is possessed of the 
 
 hereinafter set forth, described and enumerated, and hath contracted and 
 agreed with for the absolute sale to of the same, 
 
 for the sum of « now this indenture witnesseth, that in 
 
 pursuance of the said agreement, and in consideration of the sum of 
 of lawful money of Canada, paid by the to the said , 
 
 at or before the sealing and delivery of the.se presents (the receipt whereof 
 is he' eby acknowledged) the said ha bargained, sold, 
 
 assigned, transferred and set over, and by these presents do bargain, 
 sell, assign, transfer and set over unto the said executors, 
 
 administrators and assigns, all those, the said and all the right, 
 
 title, interest, propeity, claim and demand whatsoever, both at law and 
 in equity, or otiier.>ise hovv.soever, of the said of, in, to, and 
 
 out of the same, and every part thereof; to have and to hold the said 
 hereinbefore assigned and every of them and every part thereof, 
 
 with the appurtenances, and all the right, title and interest of the said 
 
 thereto and therein, as aforesaid, unto and to the use of the said 
 , executors, administrators and assigns, to and for sole and 
 only use for kvkh ; and the said do hereby, for heirs, 
 
 executors and administrators, covenant, promise and agree with the said 
 , executors and administrators, in manner following, that 
 is to say: that the said now rightfully and absolutely 
 
 possessed of and entitled to the said hereby assigned and every of them, 
 and every part thereof ; and that the said now ha in good 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 305 
 
 right to assign the same unto the said executors, administrators 
 
 and assigns, in manner aforesaid, and according to the true intent and 
 meaning of these presents ; and that the said executors, 
 
 administrators and assigns, shall and may from time to time, and at all 
 times hereafter, peaceably and quietly have, hold, possess and enjoy the 
 said hereby assigned and every of them, and every part thereof, to 
 
 and for own use and benefit, without any manner of hindrance, inter- 
 
 ruption, molestation, claim or demand whatsoever, of, from or by 
 the said or any person or persons whomsoever : and that free 
 
 and clear, and freely and absolutely released and discharged, or otherwise, 
 at the cost of the said effectually indemnified from and against 
 
 all former and other bargains, sales, gifts, grants, titles, charges and 
 encumbrances whatsoever : and moreover, that the said 
 
 and all persons rightfully, claiming or to claim any estate, right, title or 
 interest of, in or to the said hereby assigned and every of them, and 
 
 every part thereof, shall and will from time to time, and at all times here- 
 after upon every reasonable request of the said executors, 
 administrators or assigns, but at the cost and charges of the said 
 make, do and execute, or cause or procure to be made, done and executed, 
 all such further acts, deeds and assurances for the more effectually 
 assigning and assuring the said hereby assignee^ unto the said 
 executors, administrators and assigns, in manner aforesaid, and according 
 to the true intent and meaning of these presents, as by the said 
 executors, administrators or assigns, or his counsel shall be reasonably 
 advised or required, 
 
 In witness, etc. 
 
 Signed, sealed, etc. 
 
 whereof 
 ed, sold, 
 bargain, 
 cecutors. 
 he right, 
 law and 
 to, and 
 the said 
 thereof, 
 said 
 Ithe said 
 sole and 
 heirs, 
 Ithe said 
 |ng, that 
 solutely 
 )f them, 
 good 
 
 County of ) I, 
 
 To WIT : ) (the bargainee) 
 
 in the foregoing bill of sale named, make oath and say: that the sale 
 therein made is bona fide, and for good considjration, namely: — and 
 
 not for the purpose of holding or enabling me, this deponent, to hold the 
 goods mentioned therein against the creditors of the said bargainor. 
 
 Sworn before me at 
 in the County of 
 this day of 
 
 A.D, i8 
 
 A Commissioner, etc. 
 
 O B.C. 
 
 20 
 
306 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 2. CHATTEL MORTGAGE. 
 
 This Indenture, made the day of 
 
 l8 , between A. B., of, etc., and C. D., of etc. 
 
 WITNESSETH that the said for and in consideration of the sum 
 
 of 9 , of lawful money of Canada, to him in hand well and truly paid 
 by the f.aid at or before the sealing and delivery of these presents, 
 
 the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, doth bargain, sell and assign 
 unto th J said his executors, administrators and assigns, 
 
 all and every the goods, chattels, furniture and effects in and about the 
 dwelling house {or store) of the said A. B., situate at, etc., and hereinafter 
 particularly mentioned, that is to say : (Here specify the chattels : or you 
 may rrfer tja schedule, saying after the word, etc., "tvhtch are particularly 
 speciji.u in (>" schedule hereunder it'rittcn.^') 
 
 To have, receive and take the said goods and chattels hereby assigned, 
 or intenr^ftd so to Le, unto the said his executors, adminis- 
 
 trators a , ' assigns, as h's and their own proper goods and effects. 
 
 I 
 
 I J 
 
 Provided always, that if the said 
 trators, shall pay unto the said 
 trators or assigns, the full sum of 9 
 the rate of per cent., on the 
 
 next, then these presejits shall be void. 
 
 his executors or adminis- 
 his executors, adminis- 
 with interest thereon at 
 day of 
 
 And the said doth hereby, for himself, his executors 
 
 and administrators, covenant, promise and agree to and with the said, the 
 
 his executors administrators and assigns, that he 
 said his executors or administrators, or some or one of 
 
 them, shall and will well and truly pay, or cause to be paid, unto the 
 said his executors, administrators and assigns, the said sum of 
 
 money in the above proviso mentioned, with interest for the same as afore- 
 said, on the days and times, and in the manner above limited for the pay- 
 ment thereof. 
 
 And also, that in case default shall be made in the payment of the said 
 sum of money in the said proviso mentioned, or the interest thereon, or 
 any part thereof, or in case the said shall 
 
 attempt to sell or dispose of, or in any way part with the possession of, 
 the said goods and chattels, or any of them, or to remove the same or any 
 part thereof out of the without the consent of the said 
 
 his executors, administrators and assigns, to such sale, 
 removal or disposal thereof, first had and obtained in writing ; then, and 
 in such case, it shall and may be lawful for the said his 
 
 executors, administrators and assigns, peaceably and quietly to receive 
 and take unto his or their absolute possession, and thenceforth to hold 
 and enjoy all and every or any of the goods, chattels and premises hereby 
 assigned, or intended so to be, and with his or their servant or servants, 
 and with sixh other assistant or assistants as he may require, at any time 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 307 
 
 : the sum 
 ruly paid 
 presents, 
 nd assigu 
 d assigns, 
 about the 
 ereinafter 
 J ; or yoH 
 irticularly 
 
 { assigned, 
 3, adminis- 
 s. 
 
 jr adminis- 
 
 s, adminis- 
 
 thereon at 
 
 iS executors 
 le said, the 
 that he 
 e or one of 
 a, unto the 
 said sum of 
 ne as afore- 
 'or the pay- 
 
 of the said 
 I thereon, or 
 shall 
 Issession of, 
 pame or any 
 : of the said 
 lo such sale, 
 1 ; then, and 
 his 
 to receive 
 trth to hold 
 jiises hereby 
 lor servants, 
 1 at any time 
 
 during the day to enter into and upon any lands, tenements, houses and 
 premises belonging to and in the occupation of the where 
 
 the said goods and chattels, or any part thereof, may be, and to break and 
 force open any door, lock, bolt, fastening, hinge, gate, fence house, building, 
 enclosure and place, for the purpose of taking possession of and removing 
 the said goods and chattels ; and to sell the said goods and chattels, or any 
 of them, or any part thereof, at public auction or private sale, as to them, 
 or any of them, may seem meet ; and from and out of the proceeds of 
 such sale, in the first place, to pay and reimburse himself or themselves all 
 such sums of money as may then be due, by virtue of these presents, and 
 all such expenses as may have been incurred by the said 
 his executors, administrators and assigns, in consequence of the default, 
 neglect or failure of his executors, administrators and 
 
 assigns, in payment of the said sum of money, with interest thereon, as 
 above mentioned, or in consequence of such sale or removal as above 
 mentioned ; and, in the next place, to pay unto the said 
 his executors, administrators and assigns, all such surplus as may remain 
 after such sale, and after payment of all such sum and sums of money, and 
 interest thereon, as may be due by virtue of these presents at the time of 
 such seizure, and after payment of the costs, charges, and expenses incurred 
 by such seizure and sale as aforesaid. 
 
 And the said doth hereby further covenant, promise and 
 
 agree to and with the said his executors, administrators 
 
 and assigns, that in case the sum of money realized under such sale, as 
 above mentioned, shall not be sufficient to pay the whole amount due at 
 the time of such sale, then he, the said his executors or 
 
 administrators, will forthwith pay any deficiency to the said 
 his executors, administrators and assigns. 
 
 In witness whereof, the parties to these presents have hereunto set their 
 hands and seals the day and year first above written. 
 
 A. B. [L.S.] 
 Signed, sealed and delivered, 
 in the presence of 
 
 Y. Z. 
 
 Affidavit of Mortgagee, 
 
 Ontario, County of , to wit : I, C. D.. of the 
 
 of in the County of the mortgagee 
 
 in the within Bill of sale, by way of mortgage named, make oath and 
 say, that A. B., the mortgagor in the within Pill of Sale, by way of mort- 
 gage named, is justly and truly indebted to me, this deponent C. D., the 
 mortgagee therein named, in the sum of ( mentioned therein. 
 
 That the said Bill of Sale, by way of mortgage, was executed in good faith. 
 
808 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 and for the express purpose of securing the payment of the money so justly- 
 due, as aforesaid, and not for the purpose of protecting the goods and 
 chattels mentioned in the said Bill of Sale, by way of mortgage, against 
 the creditors of the said A. B., the mortgagor therein named, or prevent- 
 ing the creditors of such mortgagor from obtaining payment of any claim 
 against him. 
 
 C. D. 
 Sworn before me, at tht \ 
 
 of in the County 
 
 of this 
 
 day of i8 
 
 E. F. 
 
 A Commissioner, etc. 
 
 3. CHATTEL MORTGAGE BY WAY OF SECURITY AGAINST 
 
 ENDORSEMENT. 
 
 (Preliminary parts as be/ore.) 
 
 Whereas the said has endorsed a promissory note of 
 
 the said for the sum of $500, of lawful money of Canada, 
 
 for the accommodation of the said which promissory note is 
 
 in the words and figures following, that is to say : (here copy the note.) And 
 
 Whereas the said has agreed to enter into these 
 
 presents for the purpose of indemnifying and saving harmless the said 
 of and from the payment of the said promissory note, or 
 any part thereof, or any note or notes hereafter to be indorsed by the said 
 for the accommodfcition of the said by 
 
 way of renewal of the said recited note, or otherwise howsoever, within 
 the period of one year from the date hereof. 
 
 The proviso should be in the following form : — 
 
 Hrovided always, and these presents are upon this condition, that if the 
 said his executors or administrators, do and shall well and 
 
 truly pay, or cause to be paid, the said promissory note so as aforesaid 
 indorsed by the said ' and all and every other note or notes, 
 
 which may hereafter be indorsed by the said for the accom- 
 
 modation of the said by way of renewal of the said note 
 
 and indemnify and save harmless the said his heirs, execu- 
 
 tors and administrators, from all loss, costs, charges, damages or expenses 
 in respect of the said note or any renewals thereof, then these presents, 
 and every matter and thing herein contained, shall cease, determine and 
 be utterly void to all intents and purposes, any thing herein contained to 
 the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding. 
 
 The covenants refer throughout to the payment of the note or to the 
 renewals thereof, and can easily be adapted from the foregoing prece- 
 dent. 
 
 The aflRdavit of the mortgagee is to the effect that such mortgage truly 
 states the extent of the liability intended to be created and covered by 
 such mortgage, and to secure the mortgagee against payment of the note, 
 etc. 
 
PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 309 
 
 justly 
 >ds and 
 agaiast 
 jrevent- 
 y claim 
 
 C. D. 
 
 4. CHATTEL MORTGAGE— FUTURE ADVANCES. 
 
 (Recite fully the terms, nature and effect of the agreement for future 
 advances, and the extent of the liability to be incurred; then the agreement to 
 advance a certain sum to the mortgagor, with times of repayment, etc. The 
 «ther parts of the mortgage and the affidavit call for no special remark.) 
 
 5. DISCHARGE OF CHATTEL MORTGAGE. 
 
 AINST 
 
 y note of 
 Canada, 
 ry note is 
 ote.) And 
 into these 
 , the said 
 y note, or 
 the said 
 by 
 IX, within 
 
 hat if the 
 well and 
 foresaid 
 or notes, 
 le accom- 
 aid note 
 s, execu- 
 expenses 
 Dresents, 
 nine and 
 tained to 
 
 to the 
 g prece- 
 
 ige truly 
 Ivered by 
 Ithe note, 
 
 Dominion of Canada, \ 
 Province of Ontario. ) 
 
 To the Clerk of the County Court of the Count of 
 
 I do certify, that ha satisfied all money due on or to 
 
 grow due on a certain Chattel Mortgage made by to 
 
 which Mortgage bears date the day of A.D. 18 , and was 
 
 registered in the Office of the Clerk of the County Court of 
 
 the Count of on the day of A.D. 18 , 
 
 as No. that such Chattel Mortgage has been assigned, 
 
 and that I am the person entitled by law to receive the money, 
 and that such Mortgage is therefore discharged. 
 
 Witness my hand this day of A.D. 18 
 
 Witness 
 
 Residence. 
 Occupation. 
 
 (Usual aff davit of execution to be added.) 
 
 6. STATEMENT FOR A RENEWAL OF CHATTEL MORTGAGE. 
 
 Statement exhibiting the interest of C. D. in the property mentioned in 
 a chattel mortgage, dated the day of 18 , made between 
 
 A. B. of of the one part, and C. D. of the of the other 
 
 part, and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County Court of the County 
 of on the day of 18 , and of the amount due 
 
 for principal and interest thereon, and of all payments made on account 
 thereof. 
 
 The said C. D. is still the mortgagee of said property, and has not 
 assigned the said mortgage, {or the said E. F. is the assignee of the said 
 mortgage, by virtue of an assignment thereof from the said C. D. to him, 
 dated the day of 18 ), (or, as the case may be). No 
 
310 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCING. 
 
 payments have been made on account of the said mortgage {or, the follow- 
 ing payments and no other have been made on account of the said 
 mortgage : 
 
 1880. 
 January ist. Cash received $100). 
 
 The amount still due for principal and interest on the said mortgage is 
 the sum of f , computed as follows : — 
 
 (Here give the computation.) 
 
 CD. 
 
 SALES AND MORTGAGES OF VESSELS. 
 
 See the Merchant Shipping Act of 1854 (Imp.), 17 & 18 Vic. cap, 104 ; 
 C. S. C. cap. 41 ; 36 Vic. cap. 128, D. 
 
 The necessary forms for mortgages and sales of registered vessels may 
 be had at the Custom House of any port, and need not be set out here. 
 The Dominion Statute above referred to, gives some of the prescribed 
 forms. 
 
CHAPTER IX. 
 
 WILLS. 
 
 (See R. S. O. cap. io6.; 
 I. SHORT FORM OF WILL. 
 
 This is the last will and testament of me, A. H., of etc., made this 
 day of in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred 
 
 and 
 
 I., A. B., of in the county of 
 
 gentleman, being of sounil and disposing mind and memory, do make and 
 publish this my last will and testament, hereby revoking all former wills by 
 me at any time heretofore made. 
 
 ist. I hereby constitute and appoint my wife, E. B., to be sole executrix 
 of this my last will, directing my said executrix to pay all my just debts 
 and funeral expenses, and the legacies hereinafter given, out of my estate. 
 
 2nd. After the payment of my said debts and funeral expenses, I give to 
 each of my children the sum of dollars, to be paid to each 
 
 of them as soon after my decease, but within one year, as conveniently may 
 be done. 
 
 3rd. And for the payment of the legacies aforesaid, I give and devise to 
 my said executrix all the personal estate owned by me at ray decease 
 (except my household furniture and wearing-apparel) , and so much of my 
 real estate as will be sufficient, in addition to the said personal estate herein 
 given, to pay the said legacies, 
 
 4th. I give to my said executrix all my household furniture and wearing- 
 apparel for her sole use. 
 
 5th. I devise to my said executrix all the rest and residue of my real 
 estate, as long as she shall remain unmarried, and ray widow, with remain- 
 der thereof, on her decease or marriage, to ray said children and their 
 heirs respectively, share and share alike. 
 
 In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand to this my last will and 
 testament. 
 
 Signed by the testator as and for his last 
 will and testament, in the presence of us, 
 who, in his presence and at his request, and 
 in presence of each other, have hereunto 
 subscribed our names as witnesses. 
 
 C. D.. Merchant. 
 E. F., Clerk. 
 
 (Witiussei.) 
 
 A. B. 
 
 [Testator.) 
 
812 
 
 PRACTICAL CONVEYANCINO. 
 
 2. CODICIL TO A WILL. 
 
 This is a codicil to the last will and testament of me, A, H., of, etc., 
 bearing date the day of , A.D. i8 , {the date of the will.) 
 
 I do hereby revoke the b>.>quest to my son John, and do give and be- 
 queath the same to my daughter Jane, to and for her own absolute use 
 and benefit forever. 
 
 In all other respects I do confirm my said will. 
 
 In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 
 
 , A.D. i8 . 
 
 A. B. 
 Signed, published and declared by th* 
 said A. B., the testator, as and for the 
 codicil to his last will and testament, in 
 the presence of us, who, at his request, 
 and in the presence of each other, have 
 hereunto subscribed our names as wit- 
 nesses to the due execution hereof. 
 R. S., Merchant. 
 X. Z., Clerk. 
 
 (Witnesses.) 
 
 3. RESIDUARY DEVISE. 
 
 And as to all the residue of my real and personal estate and effects, of 
 whatever description and wheresoever situate, I give, devise and bequeath 
 the same unto heirs, executors, administrators and ar^signs, according 
 
 to the natures and tenures thereof. 
 
 i 
 
 n 
 
 s 
 
 4. DEVISE OF TRUST ESTATES. 
 
 I devise all estates vested in me as mortgagee or trustee unto and to the 
 use of the said [trustees'], their heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns 
 respectively, subject to the equities and trusts affecting the same respec- 
 tively, and, so far as I am beneficially interested as mortgagee, to be dis- 
 posed of as part of my personal estate for the purposes of my will. 
 
day of 
 A. B. 
 
 APPENDIX. 
 
m 
 
 R. S. O. CAP. 102. 
 
 An Act respecting Short Forms of Conveyances. 
 
 T T ER Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative 
 Assembly of the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows : — 
 
 '^!M 
 
 I. Wherever the words following occur in this Act, or in the Schedules 
 thereto, they shall be construed in the manner hereinafter mentioned, 
 unless there is something in the subject ^r context repugnant to such con- 
 struction : 
 
 1. "Lands" shall extend to all freehold tenements and hereditaments, 
 whether corporeal or incorporeal, or any undivided part or share therein, 
 respectively ; and 
 
 2. ''Party" shall mean and include any body politic ui' corporate or 
 collegiate as well as an individual. 
 
 2(1 Where a deed made according to the forms set forth in Schedule A 
 annexed to this Act, or any other deed expressed to be made in pursuance 
 of this Act, or referring thereto, contains any of the forms of words con- 
 tained in column one of Schedule B, hereto annexed, and distinguished by 
 any number therein, such deed shall be taken to have the same effect, and 
 be construed as if it contained the form of words contained in column two 
 of the same Schedule B, and distinguished by the same number as is an- 
 nexed to the form of words used in the deed ; but it shall not be necessary, 
 in any such deed, to insert any such number. 
 
 3. Any deed or part of a deed which fails to take eflect by virtue of this 
 Act, shall, nevertheless, be as effectual to bind the parties thereto, so far 
 as the rules of law and equity will permit, as if this Act had not been 
 made. 
 
 4« Every such deed, unless an exception is specially made therein, shall be 
 held and construed to include all houses, outhouses, edifices, barns, stables 
 yards, gardens, orchards, commons, trees, woods, underwoods, mounds, fen- 
 ces, hedges, ditches, ways, waters, water-courses, lights, liberties, privileges, 
 easements, profits, commodities, emoluments, hereditaments and appurte- 
 nances whatsoever, to the lands therein comprised, belonging or in any 
 wise appertaining, or with the same demised, held, used, occupied and en- 
 
H 
 
 R. S. O. CAP. 104. 
 An Act respecting Short Forms of Mortgages. 
 
 ER Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative 
 Assembly of the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows : 
 
 I. Wherever the words following occur in this Act or in the Schedules 
 thereto, they shall be construed in the manner hereinafter mentioned, un- ' 
 less there is something in the subject or context repugnant to such con- 
 struction ; 
 
 I. "Lands" shall extend to all freehold tenements and hereditaments, 
 whether corporeal or incorporeal, or any undivided part or share therein 
 respectively ; and 
 
 J. "Party" shall mean and include any body politic, corpoiatf or col- 
 legiate a3 well as an individual. 
 
 2* Where a mortgage of real property in Ontario, made according to the 
 forms set forth in the Schedule A annexed to this Act, or any other 
 siiclt mortgage expressed to be made in pursuance of this Act, or referring 
 thereto, contains any of the forms or words contained in column one of 
 Sehedule B to this Act, and distinguished by any number therein, such 
 mortgage shall be taken to have the same effect, and be construed as if it 
 contained the form of words contained in column two of the aame 
 Schedule B, and distinguished by the same number as is annexed to the 
 form of words used in such mortgage ; but it shall not be necessary in any 
 such, mortgage to insert any such number. 
 
 3. Any such mortgage or part of such mortgage which fails to take effect 
 by virtue of this Act shall, nevertheless, be as effectual to bind the parties 
 thereto, so far as the rules of law and equity will permit, as if this Act 
 had not been made. 
 
 shall be 
 , stables 
 nds, fen- 
 ivileges, 
 ippurte- 
 in any 
 and en- 
 
 4> Every such mortgage, unless an exception is specially made therein, 
 shall be held and construed to include all houses, out-houses, edifices, 
 barns, stables, yards, gardens, orchards, commons, trees, woods, under- 
 woods, mounds, fences, hedges, ditches, ways, waters, water-courses, lights, 
 liberties, privileges, easements, profits, commodities, emoluments, here- 
 ditaments, and appurtenances whatsoever to the lands therein comprised 
 belonging, or in any wise appertaining, or with the same demised, held, 
 used, occupied and enjoyed, or taken or knov.n as part or parcel thereof, 
 and if the same purports to convey an estate in fee, also the reversion and 
 
I 
 
 316 AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF CONVEYANCES. 
 
 joyed, or taken or known as part or parcel thereof; and if the same pur- 
 ports to convey an estate in fee, also the reversion or reversions, remainder 
 and remainders, yearly and other rents, issues and profits of the same 
 lands, and of ever>' part and parcttl thereof, and all the estate, right, title, 
 interest, inheritance, use, trust, property, profit, possession, claim, and 
 demand whatsoever, both at law and in equity, of the grantor, in, to, out 
 of, or upon the same lands, and every part and parcel thereof, with their 
 and every of their appurtenances. 
 
 6« In taxing any bill for preparing and executing any deed under this 
 Act, the Taxing Officer, in estimating the proper sum to be charged therefor, 
 shall consider not the length of such deed, but the skill and labour em- 
 ployed and responsibility mcurred in the preparation thereof. 
 
 6. The Schedules hereto, and the directions and forms therein con- 
 tained, shall be deemed parts of this Act. 
 
 SCHEDULE A.— SECTION 2. 
 
 FORM OF DEED. 
 
 This Indenture, made the day of , one thousand 
 
 eight hundred and , in pursuance of the Act respecting Short 
 
 Forms of Conveyances between {here insert names of parties and recitals, if 
 any,) Witnesseth that in consideration of dollars, of lawful 
 
 money of Canada, now paid by the said (grantee or grantees) to the said 
 (grantor or grantors) (the receipt whereof is hereby by him {or them) 
 acknowledged,) he {or they) the said (grantor or grantors) doth {or do) 
 grant unto the said (grantee or grantees) his {or their) heirs and assigns 
 for ever, all, etc. {parcels.) {Here insert covenants or any other provisions.) 
 
 In witness whereof, the said parties hereto have hereunto set their hands 
 and seals. 
 
 SCHEDULE B.— SECTION 2. 
 
 Directions as to the Forms in this Schedule. 
 
 1. Parties who use any of the forms in the first column of this Schedule 
 may substitute for the words "covenantor" or "covenantee," or "re- 
 leasor" or "releasee, ' "grantor" or "grantee," any name or names, and 
 in every such case, corresponding substitutions shall be taken to be made 
 in the corresponding forms in the second column. 
 
 2. Such parties may substitute the feminine gender for the masculine, 
 or the plural number for the singular, in any of the forms in the first 
 column of this Schedule, and corresponding changes shall be taken to be 
 made in the corresponding forms in the second column. 
 
AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF MORTGAGES. 317 
 
 reversions, remainder and remainders, yearly and other rents, issues and 
 profits of the same lands, and of every part and parcel thereof; and all 
 the estate, right, title, interest, inheritance, use, trust, property, profit, 
 possession, claim and demand whatsoever at law and in equity of the 
 grantor in, to, out of or upon the same lands and every part and parcel 
 thereof, with their and every of their appurtenances, subject always to the 
 reservations, limitations, provisos and conditions, contained in the grant of 
 such lands from the Crown. 
 
 6. In taxing any bill for preparing and executing any mortgage under 
 this Act, the Taxing Officer, in estimating the proper sum to be charged 
 therefor, shall consider noi the length of such mortgage, but the skill and 
 labour employed and responsibility incurred in the preparation thereof. 
 
 8. The Schedules hereto, and the directions and forms therein con- 
 tained, shall be deemed parts of this Act. 
 
 SCHEDULE A.— SECTION 2. 
 
 FORM OF MORTGAGE. 
 
 This Indenture, made the day of one 
 
 thousand eight hundred and , in pursuance of the Act 
 
 respecting short forms of mortgages, between {here insert names of parties 
 and recitals, if any.) witnesseth, that in consideration of 
 of lawful money of Canada, now paid by the said (mortgagee or mortga- 
 gees) to the said (mortgagor or mortgagors,) the receipt whereof is hereby 
 acknowledged, the liiid (mortgagor or mortgagors) doth (or do) grant and 
 mortgage unto the said (mortgagee or mortgagees) his (her or their) heirs 
 and assigns for ever, all [parcels) (here insert proviso's, covenants or other 
 provisions.) 
 
 In witness whereof, the said parties hereto have hereunto set tht-ir hands 
 and seals. 
 
 SCHEDULE ]].— SECTION 2. 
 
 Directions as to the Forms in (his Schedule. 
 
 ledule 
 re- 
 \s, and 
 
 made 
 
 |;uline, 
 first 
 to be 
 
 1. Parties who use any of the forms in the first column of this schedule, 
 may substitute for the words " mortgagor or mortgagors," or " mortgagee 
 or mortgagees," any name or names ; and in every such case correspond- 
 ing substitutions shall be taken to be made in the corresponding forms in 
 the second column. 
 
 2. Such parties may substitute the feminine gender for the ma.sculine, 
 or the plural number for the singular, in any of the forms in the first 
 column of this schedule ; and corresponding changes shall be taken to be 
 made in the corresponding forms in the second column. 
 
:;! : 
 
 318 AN ACT RESPECTING SHOUT FORMS OF CONVEYANCES. 
 
 3. Such parties may introduce into, or annex to, any of the forms in tV.e 
 first column, any express exceptions from, or other express qualifications 
 thereof respectively, and the like exceptions or qualifications shall be taken 
 to be made from or in the corresponding forms in the second column. 
 
 4. Siicli parties may add the name or other designation of any person 
 or persons, or class or classes of persons, or any other words, at the end of 
 form two of the first column, so as thereby to extend the words thereof to the 
 
 acts of any additional person or persons, or class or classes of persons, or of 
 all persons whomsoever ; and in every such case the covenants tzvo, three and 
 four, or such of them as may be employed in such deed, shall be taken to ex- 
 tend to the acts of the person or persons, class or classes of persons so named. 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 FORMS OF COVENANTS. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 I The said ^- ^""^ ^'^^ ^^'"^ covenantor doth hereby, for himself, his 
 (covenantor) co-heirs, executors and administrators, covenant, promise 
 venants with the and agree, with and to the said covenantee, his heirs and 
 said (covenantee.) assigns, in manner following, that is to say : 
 
 2. That he has 
 the right to con- 
 veythe said lands 
 to the said (cove- 
 nantee) notwith- 
 standing any act 
 of the said (cove- 
 nantor.) 
 
 2. That /or and notwithstanding any act, deed matter or 
 thing by the said covenantor, done, executed, committed, or 
 knowingly or wilfully permitted or suffered to the contrary, 
 he. the said covenantor, now hath in himself good right, 
 full power, and absolute authority, to convey the said 
 lands and other the premises hereby conveyed, or intended 
 so to be, with their and every of their appurtenances, unto 
 the said covenantee, in manner aforesaid, and according to 
 the true intent of these presents. 
 
AN ACT RESrECTING SHORT FORMS OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 319 
 
 3. Such parties may introduce into, or annex to any of the forms in 
 the first column, any express exceptions from or other express qualifica- 
 tions thereof respectively ; and the like exceptions or (lualifications shall 
 be taken to be made from or in the corresponding forms in the second 
 column, 
 
 FORMS OF COVENANTS. ETC, 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COI.IMN TWO. 
 
 mailer or 
 tilted, or 
 [onlrary, 
 pd right, 
 the said 
 Intended 
 pes, unto 
 Mdingto 
 
 3. The said 3. And the said mortgagor doth hereby for himself, 
 mortgagor cove- iijg heirs, executors and administrators covenant, promise 
 
 said mortgagee.^ ^"^ ^^""^^ *° ^"^ ^^''^'^ ^^^ ^^^'^ mortgagee, his heirs and 
 assigns, in manner following, that is to say : 
 
 4. That the 4- That the said mortgagor, his heirs, executors, ad- 
 mortgagor will ministrators or some, or one of them shall, and will, well 
 pay the mortgage gjjjj jjjjjy p^,^. ^j. (j^use to be paid, unto the said mort- 
 money and m- . • 1 '■ . j • . . • .u 
 terest and ob- S^^*^^' "'^ heirs, executors, admuustrators or assigns, the 
 
 serve the above said sum of money in the above proviso mentioned, with 
 proviso. interest for the same, as aforesaid, at the days and times, 
 
 and in the manner above limited for payment thereof, and 
 shall, and will in everything, well, faithfully and truly do, 
 obser^•e, perform, fulfil and keep all and sinj/ular the 
 provisions, agreements and stipulations in the said above 
 proviso, particularly set forth, according to the true 
 intent and meaning of these presents, and of the said 
 above proviso. 
 
 5. That the 5. And also, that the said mortgagor, at the time of the 
 mortgagor has a sealing and delivery hereof, is, and stands solely, right- 
 good title m fee j^j. ^^^ lawfully seized of a good, sure, perfect, absolute 
 smiple to the , . , , ., , , . , . . , . , , 
 said lands ^^^ indefeasible estate of inheritance, in fee simple of, 
 
 and in the lands, tenements, hereditaments, and all and . 
 singular other the premises hereinbefore described, with 
 their, and every of their appurtenances, and of, and in 
 every part and parcel thereof, without any manner of 
 trusts, reservations, limitations, provisos or conditions, 
 except those contained in the original grant thereof from 
 the Crown, or any other matter or thing to alter, charge, 
 change, encumber or defeat the same. 
 
 6. And that he ^- -^'"^ "'^"' ^^^^ ^^^ ^^'^ mortgagor now hath in him- 
 has the right to self good right, full power, and lawful and absolute 
 
320 AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF CONVEYANCES. 
 
 !lfl 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 ' j}. And that the 3. And that it shall be lawful for the said covenantee, 
 said (covenantee) jjjs hgjrs and assigns, from time to time, and at all times 
 possession^ ofThe^'"'^"-^''^''' Peaceably and quietly to enter upon, have, hold, 
 said lands. occupy, possess and enjoy the said land and premises 
 
 hereby conveyed, or intended so to be, with their and 
 every of their appurtenances ; and to have, receive, and 
 take the rents, issues and profits thereof, and of every part 
 thereof, to and for his and their use and benefit, without 
 any let, suit, trouble, denial, eviction, interruption, claim 
 or demand whatsoever of, from, or by him, the said cove- 
 nantor, of his heirs, or any person claiming, or to claim, by, 
 from, under, or in trust for him, them, or any of them. 
 
 4. Free from all 4- And that free and clear, and freely and absolutely 
 encumbrances, acquitted, exonerated, and for ever discharged, or other- 
 wise by the said covenantor , or his heirs, zvel I and sufficiently 
 saved, kept harmless and indemnified of, from and against 
 any and every former and other gift, grant, bargain, sale, 
 Jointure, dowtr,use, trust, entail, will, statute, rccognitance, 
 judgment, execution, extent, rent, annuity, forfeiture, re- 
 entry, and any and every other estate, title, charge, trouble 
 and incumbrance whatsoever, made, executed, occasioned, or 
 suffered by the said covenantor, or his heirs, or by any per- 
 son claiming, or to claim, by, from, under, or in trus for 
 him, them, or any of them. 
 
 t;. And the said S- -^'"^ ^^'^ ^""^ covenantor doth hereby, for himself , his 
 (covenantor) cove- heirs, executors and administrators, covenant promise and 
 nants zvith the ^g^gg jKiith, and to the said covenantee, his heirs and assigns, 
 
 '], ' i .,, ^''' that he, thesaidcovenantor.hisheirs, executors and adminis- 
 that he will exe- 
 cute such further t^'^lors, and all and every other person, whosoever, having 
 
 assurances of the or claiming, or who shall or may hereafter have or claim, 
 
 said lands as may ^ny estate, right title or interest whatsoever, either at latv 
 
 " ' or in equity, in, to, or out of, the said lands and premises 
 
 hereby conveyed, or intended so to be, or any of them, or 
 
 any part thereof, by, from, under, or in trust for him, 
 
 them, or any of them, shall and will, from time to time, and 
 
 at all times hereafter, upon every reasonable request, and at 
 
AN ACT RESPECTIN(i SHORT FORMS OF JIORTGAGES. 
 
 3-21 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 com; MS TWO. 
 
 other- 
 cicntly 
 against 
 in, sale, 
 ni%ance, 
 we, re- 
 trouble 
 oncd, or 
 \ny per- 
 'us for 
 
 convey the said 
 lands to the said 
 mortgagee. 
 
 7. And that on 
 default the mort- 
 gagee shall have 
 quiet possession 
 of the said lands. 
 
 8. Free from all 
 encumbrances. 
 
 authority tn convey the said lands, tenements, heredita- 
 inents and all and shifriilar other the premises hereby con- 
 veyed, or hereinbefore mentioned or intended so to be, with 
 their and every of their appurtenances unto the said 
 mortgagee, his heirs and assigns, in manner aforesaid, a"d 
 according to the true intent «/i</»HM«(n^ of these presents. 
 
 7. .\nd also, that from and after default shall h'ippen to 
 be made of or in the payment of the said smu of money in 
 the said above proviso mentioned or the interest thereof , or 
 any part thereof, or of, or in the doing, observing, perform- 
 ing, fulfilling or keeping of some one or more of the provi- 
 sions, agreements or stipulations in the said above proviso, 
 partieularly set forth, contrary to the true intent and mean- 
 ing of these presents, and of the said proviso, then, and in 
 every such case it shall and may be lawful to and for the 
 said mortgagee, his heirs and assigns, peaceably and 
 quietly to enter into, have, hold, use, occupy, possess 
 and enjoy the aforesaid lands, tenements, hereditaments 
 and premises hereby conveyed or mentioned or mtended 
 so to be, with their appurtenances, without the let, suit, 
 hindrance, interruption or denial of him, the said mort- 
 gagor, his heirs or assigns, or any other person or persons 
 ji'homsoever. 
 
 8. And that free and clear and freely and r/cnWr acquit- 
 ted, exonerated and discharged of and from all arrears of 
 taxes and assessments ichatsoevcr, due or payable upon or 
 in respect of the said lands, tenements, hereditaments and 
 premises, or any part thereof, and of and from all former 
 coni'eyanees, mortgages, rights, annuities, debts, judgments, 
 executions and recognisances, and of and from all manner 
 of other charges or incumbrances whatsoever. 
 
 self, his 
 isc and 
 tssigns, 
 dminis- 
 Ihaving 
 claim, 
 \at laiv 
 remises 
 \,em, or 
 |r him, 
 le, and 
 \and at 
 
 9. And that the 
 said mortgagor 
 will execute such 
 further assur- 
 ances of the said 
 lands as may be 
 requisite. 
 
 o s.c. 
 
 9. And also, that from and after default shall happen to 
 be made of or in the payment of the said sum of money, in 
 the said proviso mentioned, or the interest thereof, or any 
 part of sitcli money or interest, or of or in the doing, observ- 
 ing, performing, fulfilling or keeping of some one or more 
 of the provisions, agreements or stipulations in the said above 
 proviso particularly set forth, contrary to the true intent and 
 meaning of these presents and of the said proviso, then, and 
 in every such case, the said mortgagor, his heirs and 
 assigns, and all and every other person or persons whoso- 
 ever, having, or lawfully claiming, or who shall or may 
 ha c or lawfully claim, any estate, right, title interest, or 
 
 21 
 
322 AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FOIIMS OF CONVEYANCES. 
 
 COLUMN ONB. 
 
 COI-fMN TWO. 
 
 m 
 
 the costs and charges of the said covenantee, his heirs or 
 assi:,'ns, make, do, execute, or cause to be made, done or 
 executed, all such further and other lawful acts, deeds, 
 thiiigi, devices, conveyances and assurances in the law 
 7vhntsocver, for the better, mote perfectly, and absolutely 
 conveying and assuring the said lands and premises 
 hereby conveyed, or intended so to be, and every part thereof, 
 witli Iheir appurtenances, unto the said covenantee, his 
 heirs and assigns, in manner aforesaid, as by the said 
 covenantee, his heirs and assigns, his or their counsel in 
 the law. shall be reasonably devised, advised or required, 
 so as no such further assurances contain or imply any fur- 
 ther or other covenant or jvarranty than against the acts 
 and deeds of the person jvho shall be required to make or 
 execute the same, and his heirs, executors and administra- 
 tors, only, and so as no person who shall be required to 
 make or execute such assurances, shall be compellable, 
 for the making or executing thereof, to go or travel from 
 his usual place of abode. 
 
 6. And the said ^'- '1'"^ tfif ^"'^^ covenantor doth hereby, for himself, his 
 (covenantor) cove- heirs, executors and administrators, covenant, promise and 
 nants ititli the (igy^g with and to the said covenantee, his heirs and assigns, 
 
 i?'\ x^'^'u" J that the said covenantor and his heirs shall and will, 
 
 that he will pro- , , ^ , 
 
 duce the title unless prevented by fire or other inevitable accident, 
 
 deeds enumerat- from time to time, and at all times hereafter, at the 
 
 ed hereunder, request, costs and charges of the said covenantee, his 
 and allow copies . . ,. ,» ■ ,. ,• •, 
 
 to be made ^Z" ^""^ ° ^^^'S'^^' ^'' '"' '"^"' (tltorney, solicitor, agent, 
 
 them, at the ex- or counsel, at any trial or hearing in any action or suit at 
 pense of the said law or in equity, or other judicature, or otherwise, as 
 (covenantee.) occasion shall require, produce all and every or any deed, 
 
 instrument or writing hereunder written, for the manifes- 
 tation, defence and support of the estate, title and 
 possession of the said covenantee, his heirs and assigns, 
 in, or to, the said lands and premises hereby conveyed, or 
 intended so to be, and at the like request, cost'- and 
 charges, shall and will make and deliver, or cauf j to be 
 made and delivered, true and attested, or other copies or 
 abstracts of the same deeds, instruments and writings 
 respectively, or any of them, and shall and will permit 
 and suffer such copies and abstracts to be examined and 
 compared with the said original deeds, by the said cove- 
 nantee, his heirs and assigns, or such person as he or they 
 shall for that purpose direct and appoint. 
 
AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 323 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 5 heirs or 
 3, done or 
 its, deeds, 
 1 the law 
 ibsolutely 
 
 premisei-i 
 irt thereof, 
 lantee, his 
 y the said 
 counsel in 
 r required. 
 ly any fur - 
 st the acts 
 
 to make or 
 admtnistra- 
 required to 
 ompellable, 
 travel from 
 
 tnist of, in, to, or out of the lands, tenements, heredita- 
 ments and premises hereby conveyed or mentioned, or 
 intended so to be, with the appurtenances, or any part 
 thereof, by, from, under, or in trust for him, tht said 
 mortgagor, shall and will, from time to time, and at ail 
 times thereafter, at the proper costs and charges of the 
 said mortgagee, his heirs and assigns make, do, suffer and 
 execute, or cause or procure to be made, done suffered and 
 executed, all and every such further and other reasonable 
 act or acts, deed or deeds, devices, conveyances and assur- 
 ances in the law for the further, better, and more per- 
 fectly and absolutely conveying and assuring the said 
 lands, tenements, hereditaments and premises with the 
 appurtenancfc.i unto the said mortgagee, his heirs and 
 assigns, as by the said mortgagee, his heirs and assigns, 
 or his or their counsel learned in the law, shall or may be 
 iazifully and reasonably devised, advised or required, so 
 as no person who shall be required to make or execute 
 such assurances, shall be compelled, for the making or 
 executing thereof, to go or travel from his usual place of 
 abode. 
 
 I himself, his 
 promise and 
 and assigns, 
 ill and will, 
 e accident, 
 iter, at the 
 inantee, his 
 ^citor, agent. 
 n or suit at 
 itherwise, as 
 ir any deed, 
 |the manifes- 
 title and 
 [and assigns, 
 lonveyed, or 
 cost^ and 
 aurj to be 
 ler copies or 
 nd writings 
 will permit 
 lamined and 
 16 said cove- 
 iis he or they 
 
 lo. And also 
 that the said 
 mortgagor will 
 produce the title 
 deeds enumerat- 
 ed hereunder and 
 allow copies to 
 be made, at the 
 expense of the 
 mortgagee. 
 
 lo. And also that the said mortgagor and his heirs shall 
 and will, unless prevented by fire or other inevitable 
 accident, from time to time, and at all times hereafter, at 
 the request and proper costs and charges in the law of the 
 said mortgagee, his heirs or assigns, at any trial or hear- 
 ing in any action or suit at law, or in equity or other judi- 
 cature, or otherwise, as occasion shall require, produce 
 all, every or any deed, instrument or writing hereunder 
 written for the manifestation, defence and support of the 
 estate, title and possession of the said mortgagee, his 
 heirs and assigns, of, in, to or out of the said lands, tene- 
 ments, hereditaments and premises hereby conveyed or 
 mentioned, or intended so to be, and at the like request, 
 costs and charges, shall and will make and deliver, or 
 cause or procure to be made and delivered unto the said 
 mortgagee, his heirs and .issigns, true and attested, or other 
 copies or abstracts of the same deeds, instruments and 
 writings respectively, or any of them, and shall and will 
 permit and suffer such copies and abstracts to be examined 
 and compared with the said original deeds by the said 
 mortgagee, his heirs and assigns. 
 
324 AN ACT RESPr.CTINO SHORT FORMS OF CONVEYANCES. 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 7. And the said 
 (covenantor) cove- 
 nants with the 
 said {covenantee) 
 that he has done 
 no act to en- 
 cumber the said 
 lands. 
 
 7. And the said covenantor, for himself, his heirs, execu- 
 tors and administrators, doth hereby covenant, promise and 
 agree with and to the said covenantee, his heirs and assigns, 
 that he hath not at any time heretofore made, done, com- 
 mitted, executed, or wilfully or knowingly suffered any 
 act. deed, matter or thing whatsoever, whereby or by- 
 means whereof the said lands and premises hereby con- 
 veyed, or intended so to be, or any part or parcel thereof, 
 are, is, or shall or may be in any wise impeached, charged, 
 affected, or encumbered in title, estate or otherwise how- 
 soever. 
 
 I 
 
 
 8 And the said ^' '^""^ ^^^ ^^^'^ releasor hath released, remised, and 
 (r^Z^aso/') releases forever quitted claim, and by these presents doth release, 
 to the said (>r- remise, and forever quit claim, unto the said releasee, his 
 
 leasee) all his 
 claims upon the 
 said lands. 
 
 heirs and assigns, all and all manner of right, title, 
 interest, claim, and demand what.soever, both at law and 
 in equity, in, to, and out of the said lands and premises 
 hereby granted, or intended so to be, and every part and 
 parcel thereof, so as that neither he nor his heirs, execu- 
 tors, administrators, or assigns, shall nor may, at any 
 time hereafter, have, claim, pretend to, challenge, or 
 demand the said lands and premises, or any part thereof, 
 in any manner howsoever, but the said releasee, his heirs 
 and assigns, and the same lands and premises shall from 
 
AN ACT IlESI'ECTINa SHORT FORMS OF MORTOAOKS. 
 
 325 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 , execH- 
 ise and 
 assigns, 
 le, com- 
 red any 
 y or by 
 ;by con- 
 thereofr 
 :harged, 
 ise how- 
 
 kised, and 
 release, 
 leasee, his 
 Iht. title, 
 law and 
 1 premises 
 [part and 
 rs, execu- 
 at any 
 [lenge, or 
 thereof, 
 I his heirs 
 lall from 
 
 •currency. 
 
 11. And that ii. And also that the said mortgagor hath not at any 
 the said mortga-tjme heretofore made, done, committed, executed or wil- 
 act to^encumber ^"'^^ °^ knowingly suffered any act, deed, matter, or thing 
 the said lands, whatsoever, whereby, or by means whereof, the saitl lands, 
 
 tenements, herctUtamcnls and premises hereby conveyed or 
 mentioned, or intended so to be, or any part or parcel 
 thereof, are, is or shall, or may be in any wise impeached, 
 charged, affected or encumbered in title, estate or other- 
 wise howsoever. 
 
 12. And that ^2. And also that the said mortgagor, or his heirs, shall 
 the said mortga- and will forthwith insure, unless already insured, and dur- 
 gor will msure j^g the continuance of this security, keep insured against 
 the buildmgs on , , u c u . i 
 the said lands to '°^* "'' "^^^^g^ "y fire, in such proportions upon each 
 the amount of building as may be required by the said mortgagee, his 
 not less than heirs or assigns, the messuages and buildings erected on 
 
 the said linds, tenements, hereditaments and piemises 
 hereby conveyed or mentioned, or intended so to be, in 
 the sum of of lawful 
 
 money of Canada, at the least, in some insurance office, 
 to be approved of by the said mortgagee, his heirs or 
 assigns, and pay all premiums and sums of money neces- 
 sary for such purpose, as the same shall become due, and 
 will on demand assign, transfer and deliver over unto the 
 said mortgagee, his heirs, e.xecutors, administrators or 
 assigns, the policy or policies of assurance, receipt and 
 receipts thereto appertaining, and if the said mortgagee, 
 his heirs or assigns shall pay any premiums or sums of 
 money for insurance of the said premi-ses or any part 
 thereof, the amount of such payments shall be added to 
 the debt hereby secured and shall bear interest at the 
 rate from the time of such payments, and shall be payable 
 at the time appointed for the then next ensuing payment 
 of interest on the said debt. 
 
 13. And the 
 said mortgagor 
 doth release to 
 the said mortga- 
 gee all his claims 
 upon the said 
 lands subject to 
 the said proviso. 
 
 13. And the said mortgagor hath released, remised and 
 forever quitted claim, and by these presents doth release, 
 remise, and for ever quit claim unto the said mortgagee, 
 his heirs and assigns, all and all manner of right, title, 
 interest, claim and demand whatsoever, both at law and 
 in equity, of, unto and out of the said lands, tenements, 
 hereditaments, and premises hereby conveyed or mentioned, 
 or intended so to be, and every part and parcel thereof, 
 so as that neither the said mortgagor, his heirs, executors, 
 administrators or assigns, shall or may at any time here- 
 after have claim, pretend to, challenge or demand the said 
 lands, tenements, hereditaments and premises, or any part 
 thereof, in any manner howsoever, subject ahvays to the 
 
826 AN ACT RESPECTINO SHORT FORMS OF CONVEYANCES. 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 henceforth for ever hereafter be exonerated and dis- 
 charged of and from all claims and demands whatsoever 
 which the said releasor might or could have upon him 
 in respect of the said lands, or upon the said lands. 
 
 o And the said 9' "'^"'^^ '''^ ^^''' ('^ ^••) ^^''^^ "^ *^® ^*'*^^ (grantor) for 
 (A. B) wife of and in consideration of the sum of dollars, ol 
 
 the said (grantor) lawful money of Canada, to her in hand paid by the 
 
 hereby bars her ^^^jj ifrnxntec) at or before the sealing and delivery of 
 dower in the said . ^'' ' , . , ^. . , , 
 
 jgjjjjj these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknow- 
 
 ledged, hath granted and released, and by these presents 
 doth grant and release unto the said (grantee) his heirs 
 and assigns, all her dower and right and title which in 
 the event of her surviving her said husV)and, she might or 
 would have to dower, in, to, or out of the lands and 
 premises hereby conveyed, or intended so to be. 
 
AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT F0RM8 OF MORTOAGEH. 
 
 327 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 (A 
 the 
 
 said iihove f>nivi.-o ; but the said mortgagee, his heirs or 
 assigns, and the said lands, tenements, hereditaments and 
 premises, subject as aforesaid, shall from henceforth fi)r- 
 cver hereafter be exonesrated and discharged of and from 
 all claims and demands whatsoever, which the said mort- 
 gagor, his heirs or assifrns might or could have upon the 
 said mortgagee, his heirs or assigns, in respect of the said 
 lands, tciienunts hireditaments and premises, or upon the 
 said lar.ls, tenewcnts, hereditaments and premises. 
 
 I. And thusaid !• And the "-.aid {A. B.) wife of the said mortgager, for 
 
 B.) wife of and in consideration of the sum of of l.iwful 
 
 said mort- 
 
 me s.mi moil m,),jey „f Cmiada, to her in hand paid by the said mort- 
 gagor, horeby ,, , ,. ,,,. ,, 
 bars her dower f^''^^''^' ^^ "'' before the sealing and delivery of these pre- 
 in the said lands, sents, the receipt whereof is iioieby acknowledged, hath 
 granted ami released, and by these presents doth grant 
 and release unto the said mortgagee, his heirs and assigns, 
 all her dower, and right and title which, in the event of 
 surviving her said husband, she might or would have to 
 dower, in, to, or out of the lands and promises hereby 
 conveyed or intended so to be. 
 2. Pkovid;;!). — 2. Provided always, and these presents are upon this 
 1 his mortgage to gj,pj.^,j,j. condition, that if the said mortgagor, his heirs, 
 be void on pay- , 1 • • ^ ^ • r ,.u i 
 ment of lamunnt executors, administrators or assigns, or any of them, do 
 
 of principal mo- and shall, well and truly pay or cause to be paid unto the 
 nty) of lawful said mortgagee, his executors, administrators or assigns, 
 money of <^-'ina- ^j^g j^j.^ j^^j f^j[ gyjj^ ^j (amount of principal money) of 
 da with interest ./try/ 
 
 at (rate of inter-^^^^^^^ money of Canada, with interest thereon, at the 
 est) per cent, as rate of {rate of interest) per cent, per annum, on the days 
 follows : (ttrms and times, and in manner following, that is to say {terms 
 
 of payment <>f of payment of principal and interest) without any deduc- 
 
 frincipal and in- . '^, , , •'. ' ^, ' , , 
 
 tere'^t) and taxes **°"' defalcation or abatement out of the same, for, or in 
 
 a:rd performance respect of any taxes, rates, levies, charges, rents, assess- 
 uf Statute la-inents, statute labour or other impositions whatsoever 
 ^°"'' already rated, charged, assessed or imposed, or hereafter 
 
 to be rated, charged, assessed or imposed by authority of 
 I'arliament or of the Legislature, or otherwise, howsoever, 
 on the said lands and tenements, hereditaments, and 
 premises, wuth the appurtenances, or on the saiil mort- 
 gagee, his heirs, executors, administrators or assigns, in 
 respect of the said premises, or of the said money or 
 interest, or any other matter or thing relating to these 
 presents, and until such default as aforesaid, shall and 
 will, well and truly pay, do and perform, or cause or pro- 
 cure to be paid, done and performed, all matters and 
 things in this proviso, hereinbefore set forth, then these 
 presents, and everything in the same contained, shall be 
 absolutely null and void. 
 
328 AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 
 ! 
 
 
 14. Provided, 14. Provided always, and it is hereby declared and 
 
 that the said agreed by and between the parties to these presents, that 
 mortgagee on de-." , ., ,• , • ... 
 
 fault of payment '^ ^^'" niortR'iRor, his heirs, e.vecutors or adminis- 
 for months, trators shall make default in any payment of the said 
 
 ni^y on money or interest or any part of either of the same, 
 
 "°d'T ^^ "n according to the true intent and meaning of these presents, 
 the said lands. ^"^^ °^ *^^ proviso in that behalf hereinbefore contained 
 and calendar months shall have thereafter 
 
 elapsed, without such payment being made (of which 
 default, as also of the continuance of the said principal 
 money and interest, or some part thereof, on this security, 
 the production of these presents shall be conclusive evi- 
 dence) it shall and may be lawful to and for the said 
 mortgagee, his heirs or assigns, after giving written notice 
 to the said mortgagor, his heirs or assigns, of his inten- 
 tion in that behalf, either personally or at his or their 
 usual or last place of residence within the Province, not 
 le.ss than previous, without any further con- 
 
 sent or concurrence of the said mortgagor, his heirs or 
 assigns, to enter into possession of the said lands, tene- 
 ments, hereditaments and premises hereby conveyed, or 
 mentioned or intended so to be. and to receive and take 
 the rents, issues and profits thereof, and whether in or 
 out of possession of the same, to make any lease or leases 
 thereof, or of any part thereof, as he shall think fit, and 
 also to sell and absolutely dispose of the said lands, tene- 
 ments, hereditaments r^nd premises hereby conveyed or 
 mentioned, or intended so to be, or any part or parts 
 thereof, with the appurtenances by public auction or 
 private contract, or partly by public auction and partly 
 by private contract, as to him shall seem meet, and to 
 convey and assure the same when so sold unto the 
 purcha.ser or purchasers thereof, his heirs and assigns, 
 or as he, si, : or they shall direct and appoint, and to 
 execute and do all such assurances, acts, matters and 
 things ns may be found necessary for the purposes afore- 
 said, and the said mortgagee shall not be responsible for 
 any loss which may arise by reason of any such leasinij; 
 or sale as aforesaid, unless the same shall happen by rea- 
 son of his wilful neglect or default; and it is hereby 
 further agreed between the parties to these presents, that, 
 until sucli sale or sales shall be made as aforesaid, the 
 said mortgagee, iiis heirs, executors, administrators, or 
 assi-;ns shall and will stand and be possessed of and inter- 
 ested in the lents and profits of the said lands, tenements, 
 hereditaments and premises in case he shall take posses- 
 sion of the same, on any default as aforesaid, and after 
 
AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 329 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 I 
 
 such sale or sales shall stand and be possessed of and 
 interested in the moneys to arise and be produced by such 
 sale or sales or which shall be received by the mortgagee, 
 his heirs or assigns, by reason of any insurance upon th'" 
 said premises or any part thereof upon trust in the first 
 place to pay and satisfy the costs and charges of preparin;,^; 
 lor and making sales, leases and conveyances as afore- 
 said and all other costs and charges, damages and expen- 
 ses which the said mortgagee, his heirs, executors, 
 administrators or assigns, shall bear, sustain or be put to 
 for taxes, rent, insurances and repairs, and all other costs, 
 and charges which may be incurred in aud about the ex- 
 ecution of any of the trusts in him hereby reposed, and in 
 the next place to pay and satisfy the principal sum of 
 money and interest hereby secured or mentioned or in- 
 tended so to be, or so much thereof as shall remain due 
 and un-atisfied up to ;ind inclusive of the day whereon 
 the said principal sum shall be paid and satisfied ; and 
 after full payment and satisfaction of all such sums of 
 money and interest as aforesaid, upon this further trust 
 that the said mortgagee, his heirs, executors, administra- 
 tors or assigns, do and shall pay the surplus, if any, to 
 the said mortgagor, his executors, administrators or as- 
 signs, or as he shall direct and appoint, and shall also, 
 in such event, at the request, costs and charges in the 
 law of the said mortgagor, his heirs or assigns, convey 
 and assure unto the said mortgagor, his heirs or assigns, 
 or to such person or persons as he shall direct and ap- 
 point, all such parts of the said lands, tenements, heredit- 
 aments and premises as shall remain unsold for the pur- 
 poses aforesaid, freed and absolutely discharged of and 
 from all estate, lien, char^^e and incumbrance whatsoever 
 by the said mortgagee, his heirs and assigns, in the mean- 
 time, so as no person who shall be required to make or 
 execute any such assurances, shall be compelled for the 
 making thereof to go or travel from his usual place of 
 abode ; provided always, ami it i.-> hereby further declaretl 
 and agreed by and between the parties to these presents, 
 that notwithstanding the power of sale, antl other the 
 powers and provisions contained in these presents, the 
 said mortgagee, his heirs or assigns sli.'iil have and be en- 
 titled to his riglit of foreclosure of the cfjuiiy (jf the 
 redemption of the said mortgagor, his heirs and assigns, 
 in the said lands, tenements, hereditaments and premises 
 as fully and effectually as he mi.ujht have exercised auit 
 enjoyed the same in case the power of sale and the other 
 former provisos and trusts incident thereto had not been 
 herein contained. 
 
330 AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COIXMN TWO. 
 
 "*«•• 
 
 15. Provided 15. And it is further covenanted, declared and agreed 
 that the mortga- \^y a^j between the parties to these presents, that if the 
 for arrears of hi- ^^'^^ mortgagor, his heirs, executors or administrators, 
 terest. shall make default in payment of any part of the said 
 
 interest at any of the days or times hereinbefore limited 
 for the payment thereof, it shall and may be lawful for 
 the said mortgagee, his heirs or assigns, to distrain 
 therefor upon the said lands, tenements, hereditaments 
 and premises, or any part thereof, and by distress war- 
 rant, to recover by way of rent reserved, as in the case of 
 a demise, of the said lands, tenements, hereditaments and 
 premises, so much of such interest as shall, from time to 
 time, be, or remain in arrear and unpaid, together with 
 all costs, charges and expenses attending such levy or 
 distress, as in like cases of distress for rent. 
 
 16. Provided 
 that in default of 
 the payment of 
 the interest here- 
 by secured, the 
 principal hereby 
 secured shall be- 
 come payable. 
 
 16. Provided always, and it is hereby further ex- 
 pressly declared and agreed by and between the par- 
 ties to these pie.sents, that if any default shall at any 
 time happen to be made of or in the payment of the 
 interest money hereby secured, or mentioned, or intended 
 so to be, or any part thereof, then, and in such case, the 
 principal money hereby secured or mentioned, or intended 
 so to be, and every part thereof, shall forthwith become due 
 and payable in like manner, and with like consequences 
 and effects to all intents and purposes whatsoever, as if 
 the time herein mentioned for payment of such principal 
 money had fully come and expired, but that in such case the 
 said mortgagor, his heirs and assigns, shall, on payment 
 of all arrears under these presents, with lawful costs and 
 charges in that behalf, at any time before any judgment 
 in the premises recovered at law, or within such time as 
 by the practice of equity, relief therein could be obtained, 
 be relieved from the consequences of non-payment of so 
 much of the money secured by these presents, or men- 
 tioned, or intended so to be, as may not then have become 
 payable by reason of lapse of time. 
 
 17. Provided, i?' And provided also, and it is hereby further expressl\ 
 
 that until default declared and agreed by and between the parties to 
 
 of payment the these presents, that until default shall happen to be made 
 
 have^oiiiet cos- °' "^ '" ^^'^ payment of the said sum of money hereby 
 
 session of the secured or mentioned, or intended so to be, or the interest 
 
 said lands. theieof, or any part of either of the same, or the doing, 
 
 observing, performing, fulfilling or keeping some one or 
 
 more of the provisions, agreements or stipulations herein 
 
 set forth, contrary to the true intent and meaning of these 
 
 presents, it shall and may be lawful to and for the said 
 
 lillifl' 
 
AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF MORTGAGES. 331 
 
 COLL'MN ONE. 
 
 coh;mn two, 
 
 mortgagor, his heirs and assigns, peaceably and quietly 
 to have, hold, use, occupy, possess and enjoy the said 
 lands, tenements, hereditaments and premises hereby con- 
 veyed or mentioned, or intended so to be. with their and 
 every of their appurtenances, and receive and take the 
 rents.issues and profits thereof to his own use and benefit, 
 without let, suit, hindrance, interruption or denial of or by 
 the said mortgagee, his heirs, executors, administrators or 
 assigns, or of or by any person or persons whomsoever 
 lawfully claiming, or who shall or may lawfully clami by. 
 from, under or in trust for him, her, them or any or either 
 of them. 
 
R. S. O. CAP. 103. 
 An Act Respecting Sliort Forms of Leases. 
 
 H 
 
 EK Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative 
 Assembly of the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows: 
 
 I. Where a deed made according to the form set forth in Schedule A, 
 annexed to this Act, or any other deed expressed to be made in pursuance 
 of this Act, or referring thereto, contains any of the forms of words 
 contained in column one of Schedule B, hereto annexed, and distinguished 
 by any number therein, such deed shall be taken to have the same effect, 
 and be construed as if it contained the form of words contained in column 
 two of the said Schedule B, and distinguished by the same number as is 
 annexed to the form of words used in the deed ; but it shall not be neces- 
 sary, in any such deed, to insert any such number. 
 
 2« Any deed or part of a deed, which fails to take effect by virtue of 
 this Act, shall nevertheless be as effectual to bind the parties thereto, so 
 far as the rules of law and equity will permit, as if this Act had not been 
 made. 
 
 3. Every such deed, unless an exception is specially made therein, shall 
 be held and construed to include all out-houses, buildings, barns, stables, 
 yards, gardc-ns, cellars, ancient and other lights, paths, passages, ways, 
 waters, water-courses, liberties, privileges, easements, profits, commodities, 
 emoluments, hereditaments and appurtenances whatsoever, to the lands 
 and tenements therein comprised belonging or in any wise appertaining. 
 
 SCHEDULE A.— SECTION 1. 
 
 FORM or LEASE. 
 
 This Indenture, made the day of , in the year of 
 
 Our Lord one thousand eight hundred and in pursuance of the 
 
 Act respecting short forms of leases between , of the first 
 
 part, and . of the second part, Witnesseth, that in consider- 
 
AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF LEASES. 
 
 33» 
 
 ation of the rents, covenants and agreements, hereinafter reserve 1 and 
 contained on the part of the said party (or parties) of the second part, his 
 {or their) executors, administrators and assigns, to be paid, observed, and 
 performed, he (or they) the said party (or parties) of the first part hath 
 (or have) demised and leased, and by these presents do (or doth) demise 
 and lease unto the said party (or parties) of the second part, his (or their) 
 executors, administrators and assigns, all that messuage or tenement 
 situate, (or all that parcel or tract of land situate) lying and being (here 
 insert a description of the premises 7vith sufficient certal>ity.) 
 
 To have and to hold the said demised premises for and during the term 
 of , to be computed from the day of , one 
 
 thousand eight hundred and and from thenceforth next ensuing 
 
 and fully to be complete and ended. 
 
 Yielding and paying therefor yearly and every year during the said term 
 hereby granted unto the said party (or parties) of the first part, his (or 
 their) heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns, the sum of 
 to be payable on the following days and times, that is to say : on, etc.,) 
 the first of such payments to become due and be made on the day 
 
 of next 
 
 SCHEDULE B.— SECTION 1. 
 
 I, shall 
 stables, 
 ways, 
 iodities, 
 lands 
 ning. 
 
 ^ear of 
 I of the 
 ke first 
 isider- 
 
 Directions as to the Forms in this Schedule. 
 
 1. Parties who use any of the forms in the first column of this schedule, 
 may substitute for the words " lessee" or " lessor'' any name or names, 
 and in every such case corresponding substitutions shall be taken to be 
 made in the corresponding forms in the second column. 
 
 2. Such parties may substitute the feminine gender for the mascu'ine, 
 or the plural number for the singular in the forms in the first column of 
 the schedule, and corresponding changes shall be taken to be made in the 
 corresponding forms in the second column. 
 
 3. Such parties may introduce into or annex to any of the forms in the 
 first column any express exceptions from or express (lualification thereof 
 respectively, and the like exceptions or ciualifications shall be taken to be 
 made from or in the corresponding forms in the second column. 
 
 4. Where the premises demised are of freehold tenure, the covenants r 
 to 8 shall be taken to be made with, and the proviso 9 to apply to the heirs 
 and assigns of the lessor ; and where the premises demised are of leasehold 
 tenure, the covenants and proviso shall be taken to be made with, and 
 apply to, the lessor, his executors, administrators and assigns, 
 
334 AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF LEASES. 
 
 FORMS OF COVENANTS. 
 
 COLUMN ONE. 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 1. That the i. And the said lessee doth hereby for himself, his 
 SAid (lessee) cove- j^gj^g executors, administrators and assigns, covenant with 
 nants with the ,, . , , , , , . , , , . 
 
 said Uessoi') to ^^'^ lessor, that he, the said lessee, his executors, 
 
 pay rent. administrators and assigns, will, during the said term, pay 
 
 unto the said lessor the rent hereby reserved, in manner 
 hereinbefore mentioned, without any deduction whatso- 
 ever. 
 
 2. And to pay 2. And also will pay all taxes, rates, duties and assess- 
 taxes. ments whatsoever, whether municipal, parliamentary or 
 
 otherwise, now charged or hereafter to be charged upon 
 the said demised premises, or upon the said lessor on 
 account thereof. 
 
 3. And to re- 
 pair. 
 
 4. And to keep 
 up fences. 
 
 5. And not to 
 cut down timber. 
 
 6. And that the 
 said {lessor) may 
 enter and view 
 state of repair, 
 and that the said 
 {lessee) will re- 
 pair according to 
 notice. 
 
 7. And will not 
 assign or sub-let 
 without leave 
 
 3. And also will, during the said term, well and suffi- 
 ciently repair, maintain, amend and keep the said demised 
 premises with the appurtenances, in good and substantial 
 repair, and all fixtures and things thereto belonging, or 
 which at any time during the said term shall be erected 
 and made, when, where and so often as need shall be. 
 
 4. And also will, from time to time, during the said term, 
 keep up the fences or walls of or belonging to the said 
 premises, and make anew any parts thereof that may 
 require to be new-made in a good and husbandlike man- 
 ner, and at proper seasons of the year. 
 
 5. And also will not at any time, during the said term, 
 hew, fell, cut down or destroy, or cause, or knowingly 
 permit or suffer to be hewed, felled, cut down or des- 
 troyed, without the consent in writing of the lessor, any 
 timber or timber trees, except for necessary repairs, or 
 firewood, or for the purpose of clearance as herein set 
 forth. 
 
 6. And it is hereby agreed that it shall be lawful for the 
 lessor and his agents, at all reasonable times, during the 
 said term, to enter the said demised premises, to examine 
 the condition thereof, and further, that all want of repar- 
 ation, that upon such view shall be found, and for the 
 amendment of which notice in writing shall be left at the 
 premises, the said lessee, his executors, administrators 
 and assigns will, within three calendar months next after 
 such notice, well and sufficiently repair and make good 
 accordingly. 
 
 7. And also that the lessee shall not, nor will, during 
 the said term, assign, transfer or set over, or otherwise, 
 by any act or deed procure the said premises, or any of 
 them, to be assigned, transferred, set over or sub-let unto 
 any person or persons whomsoever, without the consent 
 
AN ACT RESPECTING SHORT FORMS OF LEASES. 
 
 335 
 
 COLUMN ONE 
 
 COLUMN TWO. 
 
 ielf, his 
 ant with 
 ecutors, 
 jrm.pay 
 manner 
 whatso- 
 
 1 assess- 
 ntary or 
 ;ed upon 
 essor on 
 
 md suffi- 
 [ demised 
 ibstantial 
 )nging, or 
 e erected 
 all be. 
 said term, 
 ) the said 
 I that may 
 like man- 
 aid term, 
 nowingly 
 or des- 
 essor, any 
 epairs, or 
 lerein set 
 
 ul for the 
 uring the 
 
 examine 
 of repar- 
 for the 
 eft at the 
 iistrators 
 lext after 
 
 ike good 
 
 in writing of tho lessor, his heirs or assigns first had and 
 obtained. 
 
 8. And that he S> And furtlier, the lessee will, at the expiration, or 
 will leave the other sooner determination of the said term, peaceably 
 premises in goon surrender and yield up unto the said lessor, the said 
 
 " ■ premises hereby demised, witli the appurtenances, to- 
 
 gether with all buildings, erections and fixtures thereon, 
 in good and substantial repair and condition, reasonable 
 wear and tear and damage by fire only excepted. 
 
 9. Proviso for 9. Provided always, and it is hereby expressly agreed, 
 re-entry by ihe that if the rent hereby reserved, or any part thereof, shall 
 
 said (Ifssvr) on > ^ unpaid for fifteen davs after any of ttie days on which 
 non-pavment ot '^ - • , , , , r 
 
 rent or non-iier- "'^ ^'^"^^ ought to have been paid, although no formal 
 formance of cove- demand shall have been made thereof, or in case of the 
 iiants. breach or non-performance of any of the covenants or 
 
 at^reements herein contained, on the part of the lessee, 
 his executors, administrators or assigns, then and in 
 either of such cases, it shall be lawful for the lessor, at 
 any time hereafter, into and upon the said demised prem- 
 ises, or any part thereof, in the name of the whole to re- 
 enter, and the same to have again, re-possess and enjoy, 
 as of his or their former estate ; any thing hereinafter to 
 the contrary notwithstanding. 
 
 10. The said 10. And the lessor doth hereby for himself, his heirs, 
 
 (/rssor) covenants gj^gj-ytors^ g^ln^iniatrators and assigns, covenant with the 
 
 wi 1 lesa [ '■■ lessee, his executors, administrators and assigns, that he 
 st-e) for quiet en- " ' 
 
 joyment. 
 
 and they paying the rent hereby reserved, and performing 
 the covenants hereinbefore on his and their part con- 
 tained, shall and may peaceably pos.sess and enjoy the 
 said demised premises, for the term hereby granted, with- 
 out any interruption or disturbance from the lessor, his 
 heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, or any other 
 person or persons lawfulh' claiming by, from or under 
 him, them or any of them. 
 
 In, during 
 
 Otherwise, 
 
 I or any of 
 
 -let unto 
 
 consent 
 
!f|i 
 
 S 
 
 K. S. O. CAP. 119. 
 
 (As Amended.) 
 
 An Act respecting Mortgages and Sales of Personal 
 
 Property. 
 
 T T ER Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative 
 •*■ ■■• Assembly of the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows : 
 
 REGISTRATION OF CHATTEL MORTGAGES AND SALES OF 
 GOODS WHERE POSSESSION IS UNCHANGED. 
 
 I. Every mortgage, or conveyance intended to operate as a mortgage, of 
 goods and chattels, made in Ontario, which is not accompanied by an im- 
 mediate delivery, and an actual and continued change of possession of the 
 things mortgaged, or a true copy thereof, shall, within five days from the 
 execution thereof, be registered as hereinafter provided, together with the 
 affidavit of a witness thereto nf tho due execution of such mortgage or 
 conveyance, or of the du'^ execution of the mortgage or conveyance of 
 which the copy filed purports tc he a copy, and also with the affidavit of 
 the mortgagee or of one of several mo^-tgagees or of the agent of the mort- 
 gagee or mortgagees, if such agent is aware of all the circumstances con- 
 nected therewith and is properly authorizf d in writing to take such mortgage 
 (in which case a copy of such authority shall be registered therewith). 
 
 2« Such last mentioned affidavit, whether of the mortgagee or his 
 agent, shall state that the mortgagor therein named is justly and truly in- 
 debted to the mortgagee in the sum mentioned in the mortgage, that it 
 was executed in good faith and for the express purpose of securing the 
 payment of money justly due or accruing due and not for the purpose of 
 protecting the goods and chattels mentioned therein against the creditors 
 of the mortgagor, or ot preventing the creditors of such mortgagor from 
 obtaining payment of any claim against him. 
 
 3* Every such mortgage or conveyance shall operate and take effect 
 upon, from and after the day and time of the execution thereof. 
 
 4« In case such mortgage or conveyance and affidavits are not regis- 
 tered as hereinbefore provided, the mortgage or conveyance shall be abso- 
 lutely null and void as against creditors of the mortgagor, and against 
 subsequent purchasers or mortgagees in good faith for valuable considera- 
 tion. 
 
AN ACT REST'ECTlN<i MORTGAGES 
 
 337 
 
 Bi Every sale of goods and chattels, not accompanied by an immediate 
 delivery, and followed by an actual and continned clianRe of possession of 
 the goods and chattels sold, shall be in writing, and such writing shall be 
 a conveyance under the provisions of this Act, and shall be accompanied 
 by an affidavit of a witness thereto (jf the due execution thereof, and an 
 affidavit of the bargainee, or his agent, duly authorized in writing to take 
 such conveyance (a copy of which authority shall be attached to such 
 conveyance), that the sale is boiiit Jhic and for good consideration, as set 
 forth in the said conveyance, and not for the purpose of holding or en- 
 abling the bargainee to hold the goods mentioned therein against the credi- 
 tors of the bargainor, and such conveyance and affidavits shall be regis- 
 tered as herein provided, within five days from the executing thereof, other- 
 wise the sale shall be absolutely void as against the creditors of the bar- 
 gainor, and as against subsequent purchasers or mortgagees in good faith, 
 
 6« In case of an agreement in writing for future advances for the pur- 
 pose of enabling the borrower to enter into ami carry on business with 
 such advances, the time of re-payment thereof not being longer than one 
 year from the making of the agreement, and in case of a mortgage of goods 
 and chattels, for securing the mortgagee repayment of such advances, or 
 in case of a mortgage of goods and chattels for securing the mortgagee 
 against the indorsement of any bills or promissory notes, or any other 
 liability by him incurred for the mortgagor, not extending for a longer 
 period than one year from the date of such mortgage, and in case the 
 mortgage is executed in good faith, and sets forth fully, by recital or other- 
 wise, the terms, nature and effect of the agreement, and the amount of 
 liability intended to be created, an<l in case such mortgage is accompanied 
 by the affidavit of a witness thereto of the execution thereof, and by the 
 affidavit of the mortgagee, or in case the agreement has been entered into 
 and the mortgage taken by an agent duly authorized in writing to make 
 such agreement and to lake such mortgage, and if the agent is aware of 
 the circumstances connected therewith, then, if accompanied by the affi- 
 davit of such agent, such affidavit, whether of the mortgagee or his agent, 
 stating that the mortgage truly sets forth the agreement entered into 
 between the parties thereto, and truly states the extent of the liability 
 intended to be created by such agreement and covered by such mortgage, 
 and that such mortgage is executed in good faith and for the express pur- 
 pose of securing the mortgagee repayment of his ad\ances or against the 
 pavment of the amount of his liability for the mortgagor, as the case may 
 be, and not for the purpose of securing the goods and chattels inentione<l 
 therein against the creditors of the mortgagor, nor to prevent such credi- 
 tors from recovering any claims which they may have against such mort- 
 gagor, and in case such mortgage is registered as hereinafter provided, the 
 same shall be as valid and binding as mortgages mentioned in the prece- 
 ding sections of this Act. 
 
 6a. 'I'he affidavit of bona fides re(]uired by the two preceding .sections, 
 may be made by one of two or more bargainees or mortgagees ; and no 
 sale or mortgage heretofore made shall be invalidated by reason of such 
 
 o'k.c. 22 
 
3B8 
 
 AN ACT RESPECTINO MOKTOAGES 
 
 affidavit being niatle by one only of several bargainees oi mortgagees. 41 
 Vic. cap. S, D. 
 
 7. Tlieinslruincnts mentioned in the preccdinfj sect ion.ssliall be registered 
 in the office of the Clerk of the Connty Court of the County or union of 
 Counties where tiie property so mortgaged or sold is at the time of the 
 execution of such instrument ; and sucli clerks shall file all such instru- 
 ments presented to them respectively for that purpose, and shall endorse 
 thereon the time of receiving the same in tiieir respective oflices, and the 
 same shall be kept there for the inspection of all parties interested therein, 
 or intending or desiring to acquire any interest in all or any portion of the 
 properly covered thereby. 
 
 8a 'riic said clerks respectively shall number every such instrument or 
 copy filed in their offices, and shall enter in alphabetical order in books to 
 to be provided by them, the names of all the parties to such instruments, 
 with the numbers endorsed thereon opposite to each name, and such entry 
 sliall be repeated .ilphabctically under the name of every party thereto. 
 20 Vic. cap. ;^ sec. 6. 
 
 9. In the event of the permanent removal of goods and chattels mort- 
 gaged as aforesaid, from the county or union of counties in which they 
 were at the time of the execution of the mortgage, to another county or 
 union of counties, before the payment and discharge of the mortgage, a cer- 
 titied copy of such moitgage, under the hand of the Clerk of the County 
 Court in wiiose oflice it was first registered, and under the seal of the said 
 court, and of the ,'iffidavits and documents and instruments relating thereto 
 filed in such olfice, shall be filed with the Clerk of the County Court of the 
 County or union of Counties to which said goods and chattels are removed, 
 within two months from such removal, otherwise tlie said goods and 
 chattels shall be liable to seizure and sale under execution, and in such 
 case, the mortgage .shall be null and void as against subsequent purchasers 
 and mortgagees in good faith for valuable consideration as if never executed. 
 
 RENEWAL OF MORTGAGES. 
 
 10* Every mortgage, or copy thereof, filed in pursuance of this Act, shall 
 cease to be valid as against the creditors of the persons making the same, 
 and against subsequent purchasers and mortgagees in good faith for valu- 
 able consideration, after the expiration of one year from the filing thereof, 
 unless within thirty days next preceding the expiration of the said term of 
 one year, a statement exhibiting the interest of the mortgagee, his execu- 
 tors, administrators or other assigns in the property claimed by virtue 
 thereof, and shewing the amount still due for principal and interest thereon, 
 and shewing all payments made on account thereof, is again filed in the 
 office of the Clerk of the said County Court of the Co'uity or union of 
 Counties wherein such goods and chattels are then situ; with an affi- 
 davit of the mortgagee, or one of the several mortgagees, or of the assignee, 
 or one of the several assignees, or of the agent of the mortgagee or assignee, 
 or mortgagees or assignees (as the case may be, duly authorized in writing 
 
AND SALES OF PERSONAL PIIOPEUTY. 
 
 839 
 
 !fS. 41 
 
 jistered 
 mlon of 
 c oi the 
 1 instru- 
 en dorse 
 and the 
 , therein. 
 )n of the 
 
 umeni or 
 books to 
 tnunents, 
 uch entry 
 y thereto. 
 
 tels mort- 
 hich they 
 county or 
 2;age,acer- 
 he County 
 )f the said 
 ing thereto 
 ourt of the 
 e removeil, 
 gooils and 
 lul in sucli 
 purchasers 
 r executed. 
 
 Is Act. sliall 
 the same. 
 [h for valu- 
 ing thereof, 
 laid term of 
 |, his execu- 
 by virtue 
 Jsst thereon, 
 Ifiled in the 
 Jjr union of 
 lith an affi- 
 |ie assignee, 
 jr assignee, 
 in writing 
 
 for that purpose, wliicli authority sliall be filed therewith, that such state- 
 ments are true, and tliat the said mortgage has not been i<ept on foot for 
 any fraudulent purpose, 
 
 loa. The statemiMit and affidavit mentioned in tin; next precedinR 
 para^•ral;h may be in the form given in tlie schedule to this Act, or to tlie 
 like effect. 
 
 10b, The said statement and affidavit shall be deemed one instrument 
 and be filed and entered in like manner as the instruments mentioned in 
 the said Revised Statute are by section eiglit thereof recpiired to be filed 
 and entered, and the like fees shall be payable for iiling and entering such 
 instrument. 
 
 loc. Another statement in accordance with the provisions of the tenth 
 pectiims of tlie Revised Statute, chaptered one hundred and nineteen, 
 respecting mortgages and sales of personal property, as amended by the 
 Act passed in the forty-third year of Iler Majesty's reign, chapter fifteen, 
 duly verified as required by that section, shall be filed in the office of the 
 clerk of the county court of the county wherein the goods and chattels 
 <U'scribed in the mortgage are then situate, within thirty d lys ne.xt preced- 
 ing the e\pirali.)n of the term of one year from the day of the filing of the 
 statement rc(iuired by the said tenth sectiim, or such mortgage, or copy 
 thereof, shall c(;ase to be valid as against the creditors of the persons 
 making the same, and as against purchasurs and mortgagees in good faith 
 for valuable consideration, and so on from year to year, that is to sav, 
 anotlier statement as aforesaid, duly verified, shall be filed within thirty 
 <lavs next preceding the expiration of one year fi-om the day of the filing 
 of the former statement, or such mortgage, or copy thereof, shall cea.se to 
 be valid as aforesaid. 44 Vic. cap. u O. 
 
 II. The affidavit required by the tenth section may be made by anynext 
 of kin, executor or administrator of any deceased mortgagee, or by any as- 
 signee claiming by or through any mortgagee or any next of kin, executor 
 or administrator of any such assignee ; but if the affidavit is made by any 
 assignee, next of kin, executor or administrator of any such assignee, the 
 assignment or the several assignments through which such assignee claims, 
 shall be filed in the olfije in which the mortgage is filed, at or before the 
 time of such refiling, by such assignee, next of kin, e.xecutor or adminis- 
 trator of such assignee. 
 
 EVIDENXE OF REGISTRATION. 
 
 I2« A copy of such original instrument or of a copy thereof, so filed as 
 aforesaid, including any statement made in pursuance of this Act, certified 
 by the clerk in whose office the same has been filed, under the seal of the 
 court, shall he received in evidence in all courts, but only of the fact that 
 such instrument or copy and statement were received and filed according 
 to the endorsement of the clerk thereon, and of no other fact ; and in all 
 
040 
 
 AN ACT ni:KPKCTIN(J MOP. TflAOrS 
 
 cases tlm original eiuiorstnnfint l)y th«^ clnrk made in purstianco of this 
 Act, ujxin any such instrument or copy, shall l)e received in evidence only 
 of the fact stated in such endorsement. 
 
 DISCIIARC.r: OV MORTflAGKS. 
 
 13. Where any mortRaf,'e of <,'oods and chattels is re>;istered under the 
 provisions of this Act, such mort(ia>;e may be discharged, by the filing, in 
 the office in which the same is registered, of a certificate signed by the 
 mortgagee, his executors or administrators, in the form given in the 
 Schedule hereto, or to the like effect. 
 
 14a The officer with whom the chattel mortgage is filed, upon receiving 
 such certificate, duly proved by the affidavit of a subscribing witness, 
 .shall, at each place where the number of such mortgage has been entered, 
 with the name of any of the parties thereto, in the book kept under section 
 eight of this Act, or wherever otherwise in the said book the said mort- 
 gage has been entered, write the words, " Disclunfred by certificate number 
 {stdtiiifT the number of the certificate),' and to the said entry such officer 
 shall affix his name, and he shall also endorse the fact of such discharge 
 upon the instrument discharged, and shall affix his name to such endorse- 
 ment. 
 
 I6« Where a mortgage has been renewed under section ten of this Act, 
 the endorsement or entries reijuired by the preceding section to be made, 
 need only be made upon the statement and affidavit filed on the last 
 renewal, and at the entries of such statement and affidavit in said book. 
 (43 Vic. cap. 13 <).) 
 
 I6< In case any registered chattel mortgage has been assigned, such 
 assignment may, upon proof by the afiidavit of a subscribing witness, be 
 numbered and entered in the alphabetical chattel mortgage book, in the 
 same manner as a chattel mortgage, and the proceedings authorized by 
 the three ne\t preceding sections of this Act may and shall be had, upon 
 a certificate of the assignee, proved in manner aforesaid. 
 
 16a. An .luthority for the purpose of taking or renewing a mortgage or 
 conveyance under the provisions of the said Revised Statute may be a 
 gener.al one to take and renew all or any mortgages or conveyances to the 
 mortgagee or bargainee. 
 
 MORTGAGES ANl^ SAI,ES OF CHATTELS IN UNORGANIZED 
 
 DISTRICTS. 
 
 17. When the personal property mortgaged or sold is withiii a Pro- 
 visional Judicial District, then the provisions of this Act shall apply ta 
 such instrument with the substitution of " the Clerk of the District Court" 
 
AN'I) SAI.KS or IM'.IWONAL I'UOl'KTtTY. 
 
 }J41 
 
 for '• the ClfiU of the County Court ;" and with the substiliition (if " tun 
 <lays" for " five days, " as the time within wliicli tht- instiumonl or a cojiy 
 thereof shall he n^'istered ; but this section shall not apply to any portion 
 of a Territorial District which lurnis pari of a I'rovisional Judicial Dis- 
 trict. 
 
 I8> Wlicn the personal property inortgajjed or sold is within a Territorial 
 I)istrict, then the provisions of this Act shall apply to such instrument, 
 with Ihe substitution of " the Clerk of the (irst Division Court of the Dis- 
 trict" for " the Clerk of the County Court,' and witii the substitution of 
 " ten days " for " five days," as the time within whicii the instrument or ■ 
 a copy thereof shall Iwe rcj^istered. 
 
 19. When personal property mortgaged or sold is within the said Tempo- 
 rary Judicial District, then the provisions of this Act shall apply to such in- 
 strument, with the substitution of " the l!lerk of the County Court of the 
 County ot ■ for " the (!lerk of the County Court,' and with the 
 
 substitution of " twenty days " for "five days." as the time within which 
 the instrument or a copy thereof shall be registered. 
 
 20a Every instrument executed before the first day of July, one thousand 
 eight hundred and seventy-seven, and which, had it been executed after 
 said day, would rtuiuire registration under tiie preceding jirovisions, shall 
 be registered on or before the first day of January, one thousand ei^ht 
 hundred and seventy-eight, m the manner reijuired by the provisions of 
 this Act, and, thereafter, every such instrument which, under the provisions 
 -of this Act, re(]uires renewal, shall, unless duly renewed, become v(;id, in 
 accordance with the provisions of this Act. 
 
 21. Nothing in the four preceding sections shall be used to aid in deter- 
 mining whether or not chapter foity-five of the Consolidated Statutes of 
 Upper Canada was, prior to the first day of July, one thousand eight hun- 
 dred and seventy-seven, in force in an> Territorial, Temporary Judicial, 
 or I'rovisional Judicial Di itrict. 
 
 ITilCS. 
 
 22. I'or services under this Act the clerks aforesaid shall be entitled to 
 receive the following fees : 
 
 J . I'\>r filing eacli instrument and affidavit, and for entering the same in 
 ii book as aforesaid, twenty-five cents ; 
 
 2. For filing assignment of each instrument and for making all proper 
 endor.sements in connection therewith, twenty-five cents ; 
 
 3. For filing certificate of discharge of each instrument, and for making 
 all proper entries and endorsements connected therewith, twenty-five 
 cents ; 
 
 4. For searching for each paper, ten cents ; and 
 
 5. For copies of any document with certificate prepared, filed under 
 tbis Act, ten cents for every hundred words. 
 
342 
 
 AN ACT RESPECTrX(i IMORTOAOES AND rROrKHTV, 
 
 MISCELLANEOUS. 
 
 23i All the instruments mentioned in this Act, whether for tlic .-nle or 
 inortf^aKe of ;^'oocls and chattuls, shall contain such sndicient ami full tles- 
 criptiori thereof, that the same may be thcioby readily and easily kr.own 
 and distinguished. 
 
 24> All aftidavits and affirmations re(jnired by this Act shall betaken 
 and administered by any jnd;,'e or commissioner or other person in or om 
 of the Province, authorized to take afhdavits in and for the Courts o; 
 ()ueen's Bench or Common I'loas, or a Justice of the Peace, and the sun* 
 of twenty cents shall be paid for each and every oath thus a Iministered. 
 20 Vic. cap. 3. 
 
 £S> This Act does not apply to mortgaj^ea of vessels registered un 'er 
 the provisions of any Act in that behalf. 
 
e sme or 
 full des- 
 y ki'.ovvn 
 
 be take!" 
 n or oiM 
 
 ourts ui 
 
 tilt! sunj 
 listered. 
 
 (1 im 'er 
 
 INDEX TO TREATISE 
 
 PRHCEDENTS, l-.ORMS, ETC 
 

 1^ 
 
 
 ? 
 
r\DEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 Abstract, Registrar's— 
 
 Should 1)L' ol)t,'iined. when. ^2. 
 Should he divided for convenience, ^2. 
 Agreements- 
 Care recjuired in drawiufr, 4S 
 
 Advantages and disadvania-es of 4,,. 
 J'ian of, (i2. - t ' 
 
 Clauses to be in.serted in, Oj 
 lH)rin of. Sec Forms. 
 
 For leases. See A<.„,.Y5-.4.ryvn//r;,^ /;pr 
 Summary of thin,i;s necessary fur, 64.' 
 
 Adtittery 
 
 iiars dower, icn. 
 
 Alien— 
 
 Under no di.sahilitv, 4, 13. 
 
 Alienation- 
 
 Kestrictions on, how far good in wills 2^2 
 Ivxamples of restrictions lield j,'ood, 2(.' 
 
 bad, 23J. 
 
 Alimony. loi. 
 
 Alteration- 
 Does not inva'id lie deed. 2-. 
 Must Ik: made ai the time oV >nstrament re-executid, 27. 
 
 Assignee 
 
 < .n«,nHl lessor canaot recover rent unless all estate of lessee vests 
 
 I'ndcrlessee noi habie as, ihi. 
 
 JJound if lessee covenants to insure in na-ne of lessor loi 
 \Vhe.^bound by stau- of account between n.or.ga.or and mort.a.ee. 
 When/of niortKa,.e , an sue in his nun name. 165. 
 
 ,Kr h'?^'"'' '^' "" '^"^•^••^"■^•^ -f>i'^»' ^uu\vith land, ,68 
 l^i..bh fo, b.eaclu.s of covcn.-.nts, bui m;,y escape b. assiyniuK , .S 
 Assignments • o c. j 
 
 I'reliiiiin,!,}-, i^h. 
 
 Ditferences ijeiwten sales and ij(> 
 Of leases, 157. j^,,. 
 
 If no covenant to the contrary tenant mav assi-n I =;- 
 (.ovenant not to sublet, not usual in ,5-' ^■'''^'■ 
 
 Doubtful if lessee can devise whole teim 157 
 
■ 
 
 :m 
 
 34() 
 
 INDEX TO TnEATISE. 
 
 B 
 
 Bill of Exchange 
 
 Assigiiincnt o(. i^S. 
 
 Bill of Sale- 
 Set; Chtitfcl M<jrti(<ii^r,-^ 
 
 Bonds 
 
 Wliat should be soarciied for, 4^. 
 
 Boundary - 
 
 'I'o n riv'cr, wlirit, Si>. 
 
 G 
 
 Capacity - 
 
 To contract, how affected, 4. 
 
 Cestui Que Trust — 
 
 Set! Tnistci'S. 
 
 Ctiattei Mortgage and Bills of Sale- 
 objects of Act, 1.S8. 
 
 When t!) be in ",'. ritini,' and reiristcred, 45. 
 Keqiiireinents of, luiiier K. S. O. cap. iiq, iS>). 
 HoiM fidrs reiiuired in. i<)o. 
 May he made after jiidv;inrnt, iqi. 
 May be made after Division t'ourt I",\ccntions and before seizure, 
 
 191. 
 Does not affect land'.onl, r():. 
 \'<dual)!e consideration necessary, ig^ 
 Must ha\e sulficient statement of cnnsider.ition. to.',. 
 Advisable to have debt secured by, payable on demand, .'05. 
 Special points to be observed in, ^1)4. 
 Kifilits of mort,:,'ai;('t,> under, JO<S. 
 lilijihts of niort,t;a'.;or uiidtr. jo(). 
 l"or sale and morti,'a,i;e of ships. See S'lif'S. 
 
 Chattel Moririagc and Bills of Sale Act 
 
 Wdiat arc 
 
 d.s and chattels within. n).i, 
 
 Does not apply to vessels, u)^. 
 
 Are gro\vin<4 crops within, 191. 
 
 .\fter ac'iuiretl <;oods may be mortga<.:ed on certain occasion?, roy. 
 
 Requiremt^nts of bills of sale inider. igS. 
 
 Difler>tnce bi-tween chattel n;ort,i^a;.;c and bill of sale, joo. 
 
 I'orm of con\'e'.ance under, ji o. 
 
 Certainty required by, .;o'i. 
 
 Chose in Action 
 
 What it includes, 107. 
 
 Transferable by statt\te, 107. 
 
 I. aw f,'overnin;,', loS. 
 
 Distinf,'iii.>he<l from chose ni possession, i^g. 
 
 .\ssii;nments of, O"). 
 
 I'-tft.'ct of ilonor declaring,' himself trustee of, 17(1 
 
 Assiqufie of, must have beneficial interest in, 170. 
 
 n Possession - 
 
 What are. i,So. 
 
 How transfer! ed. iSi. 
 
 I'aro! gift v\ill pass with uit delivery in some C3se«, ib'i. 
 
^ SeiZllf;?, 
 
 jn-.. rc)7. 
 
 IXDKX TO TBEATISK. 
 
 Choses in Possession -Co;///;;«,v/.- 
 
 Transtornui by dei.'d poll, 182. 
 What coviMiaiUs siiould !x; asked f.r, 1S2. 
 Deed shotdd contain power to enter.'iS^ 
 No habendum in transfer of, I S J. 
 
 Clauses- 
 Consideration and re'eipt, 74. 
 ^ Not essential (o contracts under seal 7 1 
 Necessary in bar-ain and sale, 74. 
 
 Consideration— 
 
 V'aluable—fioofl what. 55. 
 Failure of, effect, 5.'. 
 
 Corilracls— 
 
 Subject matter of, 14. 
 
 l.aws governinj,', 74. 
 
 Authenticity of, 54. 
 
 Jiequiring sealed instrument, 54 
 
 Requiring writing, but no seal 55 
 
 Not within i7ih sec. Stat, of !•' rands 56 
 
 Tor s?ile ot emblements and of natural nrodncts, .;c, 
 
 Statutory requisites of, 57. ■* '^'-> 5y- 
 
 What are void, ^o. 
 
 What are voidable, 51. 
 
 Conveyances— 
 
 What included in, i. 
 
 Term not strictly applicable to personal nropertv r 
 I'onnded on Contract, 2. ^'='^*.'- 
 
 Keciuired to be in writing and .sealed - 
 How affected by Stat, of Uses, 78, 
 Advantages of Short forms of, uj. 
 Conveyancing - 
 
 Scope of treatise, t. 
 
 Copyright- 
 Assignment of, 17 5. 
 Where recorded,' 173. 
 
 Coporaiions ~ 
 
 (Irant by and to, 6, 
 ?.lortga;/es by, 6. 
 
 ("ontracts of, under corporate .seal, ". 
 When corporate seal not neie.-,sary '■^' 
 How capacity to ,ontract restricted, 4. 
 Covenants — 
 
 IT-om municipal corporations - 
 
 IVoin limited ov.ners, ,S. '" 
 
 IVom trustees, 7. ' 
 
 Idfect of, 17-ig. 
 
 Dilference l),-tueen tho.-^: 
 
 No particular word.s 
 
 \Vhen recit.'ils e<piivv,. . 
 
 Kxtent of, I) 5, 
 
 Personal v.ilue 01, 6 j. 
 
 ' 'sual in treehold, 94." 
 
 I sual in lea.ses, 1 1,,, 
 I'tff from i-iiiuiiil,f(,itii- 
 
 I)<jes not include arrears of taxes 
 turtut-y ii.tsiircnne 
 
 K.xtent uf, (jt). 
 
 347 
 
 under and tho.se not under the Statute 18 
 ss.ary in, .j.;. 
 
848 
 
 INDEX TO TllEATISK. 
 
 Covenants Contiinini- 
 Qiiict possession , 114 . 
 
 Breach of. uliat, 95. 
 Pfvdiictiou 
 
 Mxtont (if. <i7 
 
 When allowed. c)S. 
 Rclensr all clninis 
 
 Of 110 spt'cial vahie, uS. 
 
 When omitted in England, <i.S. 
 I'oi' title 
 
 Henuht of, runs with land, l^^. 
 
 Absohiti: owner must ^ive, ii^. 
 
 Must he entered into with ^''-'i'ltec to nses, 94. 
 Not to assin^ii 
 
 I)oes not affect under lease. 137. 
 
 Crown 
 
 Source of ownership, ^. 
 
 Absolute! owner, 3. 
 
 'l';l:es when no other owner, 5. 
 
 "rincinles of escheat to, s 
 
 No escheat tron) cr)rporation unless defect in title, 5. 
 
 Conve\ s by open letter, 5. 
 
 drants I'ow construed, 5. 
 
 Never p;;\es covtMiants, 5. 
 
 Kepiesented by i^^ieutenant-'jovernor in this Province, 5. 
 
 i'ltiinus luc-rrs, when, .SO. 
 
 Crown Grant - 
 
 Not ;,'enerallv searched. ^. 
 Instruments for search, 3.1, 
 Wlien consent of husband disjienscd with, 34. 
 
 D 
 
 Datfi 
 
 Decree 
 
 Deed 
 
 Not • cessnry but convenient, 20. 
 Sundav not pioper dat(^ 'jo. 
 
 (>f Court does not warrant title, 40. 
 
 May be execntt^d b\ .ittorney, 23. 
 Consummated by (ielivery, 2^. 
 
 Deliveiy - 
 
 \\ hat is. js. 
 
 l>eed takes eflect from 23. 
 
 Description - 
 
 iXe^^istered plan must be referred to in, 86. 
 
 If particular, differs from crown the latter prevail?, ^a. 
 
 Discliarge 
 
 • londiiions of. 67. 
 
 Dowar 
 
 Ve!».l(n- a;4reeing to conve>' inu->i con\-ey free of, .iS, 
 When abatement in purchase rn mey on account of, j8. 
 Ail encumbrance durmj; husbanil's life. jS. 
 I'loper mode if wift will not bar, j<» 
 Who are entitled to. '19. 
 
IXniOX TO TRKATISE. 
 
 310 
 
 Dower— Co;;//// /((.(/ - 
 
 Noiu- 111 joint tfiiancv mo 
 
 VVulow mav fleet as to i,jo 
 Adultery bars, loi. 
 None ill wild Ian-Is loi 
 
 nm.ct ot lur by wite in jnoitj,'a-e i^i h « . 131. 
 
 Uheii l.ar ot. >lis,H^„sed uith by court', ,., 
 
 Attaduj. M ,h. husband .-isod ot au estate in fee, ,5., 
 
 Duplicate- 
 Not necessnr.N' but usual an.l oonNoiiient 20 
 Value of registrar's certilkate on, ji. ' ' 
 
 p: 
 
 Easements- 
 
 l>elined, S^. 
 
 I 'ass under -eneral grant, 89. 
 
 How coinevtd, ijo. 
 
 Election— 
 
 \\i<lou may elect between annuity and dow 
 
 Emblements - 
 
 Wbat are. iSo. 
 
 Encumbrances- 
 See /wV;;.v. /it/^/./i-. HV,/,,.^^^. 
 
 Entail— 
 
 fJeneral— Special— ^,/<,,/, ,'?^. 
 
 Equitable Estate 
 
 Nested b\ contract of sale. 104. 
 
 Escheat - 
 
 b:ffect of, 3. 
 
 None from a corporation, 5. 
 
 Escrow — 
 
 What is J3. 
 
 Estate Tail- 
 Words necessary to constitute S4 
 I.efj;al incidents of, 85, 
 
 Execution — 
 
 N\hat is sufticient, 21. 
 
 Executors — 
 
 Who sliouid be nj^pointed, 22S. 
 
 Have nothin- to do with real estate '2S 
 An<i trustees should be same persons. 22'^ 
 JJuties of, .'50. -'' 
 
 er, 100. 
 
1550 
 
 INDEX TO TIIKATISE. 
 
 F 
 
 Fee Simple— 
 
 Liinitation of, S5. 
 
 Incidents <<(, i>^. 
 
 Word.s " siuxessors ' necessary in j^nmts to corpor;ition-i, 85. 
 
 I'se of hi)W lunited, H5. 
 
 Feoffment 
 
 i>t;finitii>n of, 77. 
 
 No. ill I'statc.T in renuiiiuler, 77. 
 
 I!y dccil, 77. 
 
 Fixtures — 
 
 Wliat are, 180. 
 
 G 
 
 Grant - 
 
 l>iflorence hotween, and mortgrige, iS. 
 
 (irant and feofnnent, 77. 
 
 Nature nf, Sd. 
 
 Interests usually comprised in a tyrant of land, 8u. 
 
 Cannot commttnce in fiiliiro. 81. 
 
 To corporations, KniJcd by charti-r, 4. 
 
 Grantees — 
 
 Waom th.e term should include, 4. 
 
 Kestric;tious of as to estates accruin;^ by marriage, 4, 
 
 Aliens '-an be, 4. 
 
 Slionld be parties to grant, 4. 
 
 Grantors — 
 
 Title describes who are, 3. 
 See I'nitiis. 
 
 Guardian— 
 
 Of infant cannot lease, 10, 
 
 
 i?r 
 
 H 
 
 Habendum— 
 
 Definition of, 90. 
 What intended to define, 90. 
 Must correspond with grant, 90. 
 When void in deed, gi. 
 Grant not strengthened by, 91. 
 Object of, 92. 
 Declares trusts in, 92, 
 In leases, 119. 
 
 Heir- 
 
 fJltiniiis ha-rcs, 86. 
 
 Hereditaments Incorporeal— 
 
 What are, 55. 
 How assigned, 55. 
 
 Husband— 
 
 i'ower of, over wife's interests in estates of inheritance, 8. 
 
INDEX TO TliKATlSK. 
 
 I 
 
 Idiof. Sec Liiihitii. 
 
 Infants 
 
 '•■/invyancfhy, wlirn v.-idahle, n. 
 Disability of as ref,';irds sale ,, 
 \\ lion grantor bom,,! j,, silesto (, 
 Matuturv n-i,latinn as fo estates of u, 
 \Micn estates, -f, sm,M l,y ,■,,„,.(, ,„, 
 
 Insolvency 
 
 ( 'II coiuoyance in, provisions of the Act 
 
 Instruments - 
 
 NVho must be parties to. 4. 
 I'-rasnres in. jj 
 
 -Not pronerlv.l, -.Is until .seals put on, j.,. 
 interest in Land 
 
 ^^'Ii;it i.s an, j;. 
 
 interest 
 
 When, on purchase nionex, i,,, 
 l^aw re^aniin- ni nr -rt^^a^.^s. i.,^. 
 And see .l/o,-/;'-„„,.s ^ 
 
 851 
 
 must be complied with. 42. 
 
 Lapse - 
 
 /low pieventcd. 2.j(j. 
 
 Leasehold Properly - 
 
 Assi.^^n/nent of, must be ii 
 
 leases 
 
 I \\ritin,i;, 39. 
 
 i'reliminarv remarks on u.^r 
 i'odnitinn of, ,,,- 
 
 Alain features and difficulties ui ioi\ 
 I ecuhanties m, of «oods and chattels, 2: . 
 li<nv made, toS. ' ^^• 
 
 Effect of Statute of Frauds on loS 
 Advantages of written over parol, ,0,, 
 i-arol. cannot commence .7, futuro. ,00 
 1-ssential j)aris to all u ^ ' ^ 
 
 teases. Parol— 
 
 pmnot commence //, /■///«,.<>. ,,. 
 
 Lessor not bound to give pos.session under i u 
 
 •xeneral disadvantages of, i j 4. ^' 
 
 teases by Deed- 
 
 Kemarks on short forms of ns 
 Habendum in, i ig. 
 Heddcnduni in, jkj. 
 
 Leases, Agreements for - 
 
 Must be in writing, signed, 100 
 Suggestions for drawing, 1 10 
 

 INDKX TO TIIKATIHK. 
 
 Leases. Covenants in - 
 
 'I'd wlioiti tlicy apply, i^o. 
 7'i) piiy mil. Si;e Knit. 
 
 P.inds lossiH!, executors and a;;siL,'ns, i jo. 
 
 Kent :ii('iil('iit to tlu! reveiiiioii. ui. 
 
 UiiidiiiKeven itpreimses burnt unless stipulation to tlic contrary, i ji. 
 
 Amount must he certain, i^i. 
 
 Must be reserved to lessor, not to a third partv, j Ji, 
 
 Six years' arrears may be sued tor, 12.'. 
 
 Kent not barred until after ten years, 122. 
 
 Apportionabli. in n sped of time, i2J. 
 To pay tn.\i-s, 122. 
 
 What included in, iji. 
 To rrpdir. lij. 
 
 Extent of, 123. 
 To ktcp «/> J'liicrs, 1J4. 
 \ot to cut fiinhiT, 12.}. 
 
 What included in, 124. 
 To inter (iiid vit'-tf state of repair, 12^. 
 To Uavi' ill f;;(ioil repair, 124. 
 
 What is performance of, 124. 
 iVo/ to assiffii or sublet without leave, 125. 
 
 ICftect of, 125. 
 
 Wor(ls to be used in, 125. 
 Quiet enjoyment, 127. 
 
 Meaning, eflect of, 127. 
 Proviso for re-entry, 127. 
 
 Importance of, 127. 
 
 Legacies— 
 
 rharged on land are a lien, 3S. 
 
 Legal Estate- 
 Vested by formal conveyance, 104. 
 
 Lessee- 
 
 Lessor- 
 
 Liens- 
 
 Obligations of. 1 16. 
 Kights of, 117. 
 
 May sublet unless prohibited by lease, 125, 
 Houu'l to tender rent to lessor, 122. 
 See Leases, Covenants in. 
 
 Has legal ri,c;ht to be indemnified against holder of lease on breacli 
 of covenant, 107. 
 
 Title of, not so important as in Ivngland, 106. 
 
 Must verify title, 106. 
 
 Cautions regarding title of. 107. 
 
 Cannot make lease binding on mortgagee, 107. 
 
 Obligations of, 114. 
 
 Kights of, 1 15. 
 
 Must demanti rent before he can re-enter for non-payment, 120. 
 
 What, in Canada, 43. 
 
 Life Estate - 
 
 Incidents of, Sr. 
 
 At (.'ommon Law cannot commence in future, Si. 
 
 Conveying words in. So. 
 
 Waste in, what is, 8j. 
 
 Lis-pendens— 
 
 I'olicy of the courts as regards, 41, 
 Certificate of dismissal of, should be tiled, 41. 
 
INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 Livery of Seisin, ']^, 
 Lunatics— 
 
 What classes the term inchules. lo 
 
 U hen, can contract, ii. 
 
 Proof of sanity when required n 
 
 1 roof of insanity when required I'l 
 
 Law as to contracts with men of' doubtful n.ind 12 
 
 Sale to, when not good, 12. '""Ju, 12. 
 
 Registrar executes conveyances for, 12. 
 
 853 
 
 M 
 
 Market Overt- 
 Meaning of, 185. 
 
 Marriage Settlement- 
 Must appear to be in lieu of dower 100 
 U hen not a bar to dower, 100. 
 
 Married Women— 
 
 iqurbfeSteToflT' "^'^^ ""'"^ '"^'^"^' ^°"^^"''"«' «• 
 Can execute deed alone, when, 8. 
 
 Mechanics' Lien- 
 Duration of, 41. 
 
 Merger— 
 
 Of written agreement and deed, 67. 
 Misdescription — 
 
 A ground for compensation, 70. 
 
 Mistake — 
 
 No relief in mistake of law, 51 
 I-aw as regards in extenso, 52. ' 
 
 Mortgage- 
 Definition cf, 133. 
 In what different from sale 134 
 Statutory form for R. S. O. caj! 104, 134. 
 
 OfTh nT'r- °^ ^T"h°JJ«. of chattels, 134. 
 Of chattels, how made, 134. ^^ 
 
 Of land, what it contains. 134 
 
 Security for advances under, 135 
 
 l^ersonal covenant in value of, n6 144 
 
 Securities classified, 138. 
 
 Sk^Z 1f^ ""^ P°^'''°" ^' ^^^'«"- °f Pr^'^-cry note. X65. 
 Resume of, 139. 
 
 V-ihffnf" ^'""^ ^^""^ °^ f^""* '" covenants, 140. 
 Va ue of proviso, as to possession, 141 ^ 
 
 Rstate clause in, 142. ^ 
 
 Recitals in value of, 142. 
 Proviso for redemption in, 143. 
 Effect of discharge 14:1 
 Dischanyc of— ^ 
 
 By what Statute eftected, 153, 
 
 CertiHcate must be registered, 154 
 
 Jittect of, before registration, 154 
 
 VVhen legal estate revested, 154. 
 
 When married woman can give, 154. 
 
 Absence of subscribing witness, no objcc;-on 1 1; , 
 
 23 
 
^ 
 
 
 IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 // 
 
 ^ .^. 
 
 I! 1.0 
 
 1.1 
 
 '" lU |2.2 
 ' «S 1110 
 
 ^S 
 
 
 11.25 ju III 1.6 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 6" 
 
 ► 
 
 VQ 
 
 ^^ 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 ^^ y 
 
 
 ''fW^" 
 
 // 
 
 y 
 
 /!!^ 
 
 Hiotographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 33 WEST MAIN STREET 
 
 WEBSTER, NY. 14580 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 
«5' 
 
354 
 
 INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 Mortaage —Continued— 
 Purchase of — 
 
 When subject to existing eqiiitins even witiiout notice. i6}. 
 Assif^nmenl of — 
 
 Three things to be noticed in, 165. 
 
 Two things to be considered l>y assignee. 163. 
 
 Mortgagor ought to be a party to, 163. 
 
 Subject to e({tiities a.s iMitween original parties, 163. 
 
 Proper words in, to pass land and tenements, 16O. 
 
 Mortgaai 
 
 lee— 
 
 low limited as to purchase of estate in default of payment, 143. 
 If dead before payment personal representative entitled to the 
 
 money, 144. 
 Cannot purchase at his own sale, 148. 
 /m Possession — 
 
 Cannot transfer his securities without consent of mortgagor, 1O3. 
 
 Difficulties attending the case of, 164. 
 
 When not a mortgagee in technical sense, 164. 
 
 Decisions as to transferring mortgage without collateral securities, 
 
 165. 
 Entitled to possession, when, 153. 
 
 Mortgagi 
 
 :<ights of, 165. 
 Ought to be a party to assignment, 166. 
 Gives absolute covenants for title, 147. 
 In possession not liable for rents or profits, 133. 
 When entitled to possession, 132. 
 
 Entitled to tender discharge to mortgagee fur execution, 155. 
 If in possession without proviso is tenant to mortgagee, 133. 
 Entitled to surplus after mortgagee paid, 149. 
 
 N 
 
 Nolict to Qutt- 
 
 In tenancy from year to year, half year necessary, 129. 
 
 In monthly holding, 129. 
 
 Not necessary to a tenancy at will, 129. 
 
 Parol sufficient when, 129. 
 
 Must be directed to tenant, 130. 
 
 May lje sent by post, 130. 
 
 Owner- 
 Investigation of title discloses, 3. 
 
 Parties- 
 
 -I 
 
 Questions as to, 3. 
 
 Who must be, 3. 
 
 Agent or attorney should not be, 3. 
 
 Should not be witnesses, 26. 
 
 See Corporation, Alien, tte., etc. 
 
 
INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 355 
 
 43 
 tu the 
 
 lOj. 
 iiritics. 
 
 P«lenf- 
 
 MihU; of conveyance by crown. 5. 
 Const nied in favor of jjrantce, 5. 
 Matter of record. 6. 
 
 Patentt- 
 
 AssiRnable by written instrument, 173. 
 
 In Canatla assij^ninRnt must be by deed, 174. 
 
 Where registered and with whom, 17J. 
 
 Extent ol assignment of. as against assignor. 173. 
 
 Policies of Insurance. 173. 
 
 Company must consent to assignment of, 175. 
 
 Power of Leasing— 
 
 Must be executed by party named, 148. 
 
 Power of Sale - 
 
 Statutory, 147. 
 Mortgage valid without, 147. 
 
 Cannot be exercised by any one not within the wording of the mort- 
 gage. 147. 
 Word assigns should never be omitted. 147. 
 Advertisement not absolutely necessary under, 148. 
 Mortgagee may sell pending suit to redeem, 148. 
 Does not authorize partition or exchangt*. i4i>. 
 When executors iiersonally liable conveying under. 149. 
 
 Power of Sale Stntutory— 
 
 When used, 150. 
 
 (liven, Ontario Statute's 1S79, 150. 
 
 Difference of sale under and in pursuance of power in mortgage, i so 
 
 When it will be used. 151. » 8 • 3 
 
 Probate - 
 
 Decides what, 38. 
 
 Regulations respecting, 248. 
 
 Paj>ers necessary for, 249. 
 
 Better evidence than will. 250. 
 
 When issued, executor may act safely, 250. 
 
 Tees payable on, 241J. 
 
 Promissory Note- 
 Assignment of. 16S. 
 
 Property- 
 Difference between transfer of real and personal, 176. 
 Divisions of property, 177, 180. 
 How formerly divided, 178. 
 Corporeal — inco'.poreal. what, 17S. 
 Keal. why so-called, 179. 
 Personal, why so-called, 179. 
 Distinctions between real and personal, 179. 
 
 Personal Property- 
 Divisions of, 180. 
 See Chases in possession. 
 See Choses in action. 
 
 Difference betweoa title of and realty, 44. 
 What constitutes title to, 45. 
 
 fc 
 
 B 
 
 Real Property — 
 
 Lev loci rei sit.e governs, 14. 
 
 When lin^lish l^iw of, introduced here, 14. 
 
 D.ffero'nce in transfer of, in Eu^lanJ and m Caauda, 15. 
 

 866 
 
 INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 RMilalt— 
 
 Where found, when useful, what contained in, 20. 
 
 Narrative — introductory, 72. 
 
 In what deeds necessary, 72. 
 
 When they amount to estoppel. 73. 
 
 May not bs conclusive as to facts. 74. * 
 
 Erroneous may not bind party claiming, 74. 
 
 RedM irtion— 
 
 Proviso for, 143. 
 
 RMktendum— 
 
 In lease, 119. 
 
 Rf-entry— 
 
 Positive covenant required to warrant a right of, 127. 
 
 Most important reasons for proviso, 127. 
 
 Time for, 127. 
 
 Formal demand not necessary, 128. 
 
 Registration- 
 Why necessary, 28. 
 
 What leases require under Registry Act, 29. 
 In sales for taxes deed must be registered within six months, 29, 
 
 Rent- 
 
 Incident to reversion, 121. 
 
 Cannot be reserved out of incorporeal hereditaments, 121. 
 
 Must be certain, 121. 
 
 Limit to restraint for, 122. 
 
 Accrues due from day to day, 122. 
 
 8 
 
 Sale— 
 
 Of land— 
 
 Preliminary, 69. 
 
 All particulars to be inserted in deed, 69. 
 
 In, growing crops go with freehold, 70. 
 Of Personalty — 
 
 What necessary to at common law, 183. 
 
 Consideration required, 184. 
 
 No writing necessary at common law, 184. 
 
 What may not be sold, 184. 
 
 When warranty will be implied, 185. 
 
 Where vendor has had title, 185. 
 
 Covenant for title should be express, 186 
 
 Covenant implied in, 186. 
 
 Provisions statute of frauds respecting, 186. 
 
 Provisions, Lord Tenterdens Act respecting, 186. 
 Confirmed by lapse of time — 
 
 Ratification of, must be in writing and signed, 9. 
 Conditions of, 65. 
 
 Specified, C6. 
 
 Seal- 
 Not necessary to place finger on. 23. 
 Should be put on before attempted execution, 24. 
 What is a sufficient seal, 24. 
 Corporate, must be affixed by agent authorized, 25. 
 
 Searches— 
 
 To be made before mortgage or sale of personalty, 46. 
 Real estate, 32, 4b. 
 
INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 867 
 
 Securttios— 
 
 Consolidation of, 164. 
 Distinguished from tacking, 164. 
 
 Signature- 
 Not essential to a deed, 22. 
 
 Ships- 
 Number of legal owners limited, 211. 
 Ownership of must be registered, 211. 
 Defined by 36 Vic, cap. 128, 211. 
 How transferred, 211. 
 
 Not required to be registered, how transferred, 212. 
 Provisions respecting mortgages 01, 213. 
 
 Slierl forms of Conveyancing- 
 Authority for, 71. 
 Act respecting, 17. 
 Value of, 17. 
 Capabilities of, 16. 
 Advantages of, 19. 
 
 Statutes— 
 
 27 Henry VHI., cap. 10; 74. 79, 80, 81. 92. 
 
 32 Henry VHI., cap. 28 ; 81. 
 
 cap. 34 ; 160. 
 Statutes of Elizabeth, 191. 
 
 29 Car. n., cap. 3 ; 54, 59, 63, 67, 108, 189, 190, 195. 
 cap. 3, sec. 4; 55, 57, 133, 187, 196. 
 cap. 3, sec. 17; 46, 56, 186, 187, 196. 
 cap. 24 ; 225. 
 .4 Geo. II., cap. 28; 115, 116, 117. 
 
 cap. 28, sec. 5; 122. 
 •9 Geo. II., cap. 36 ; 6, 22. 23, 28, 29, 231, 233. 
 II Geo. II., cap. 19; 116, 117. 
 5 Geo. III., cap. 17; 81. 
 <) Geo. IV., cap. 14, sec. 7 ; 186, 189. 
 4 William IV., 99, 152. 
 4-5 William IV., cap. 22; 120. 
 5-6 Vic, cap. 108 ; 81. 
 .8-9 Vic, cap. 106 ; 77. 
 15-16 Vic, cap. 24, sec. i, (Imp.) ; 243. 
 17-18 Vic, cap. 36, (Imp.) ; 195. 
 
 cap. 104, (Imp.); 211, 212, 213, 214. 
 
 cap. 43; 81. 
 18-19 C- S- C., cap. 41 ; 212, 213. 
 
 cap. 63 ; 5. 
 23-24 Vic, cap. 145; 151. 
 25-26 Vic, cap. 63; 214. 
 29 Vic, cap. 21 ; 5. 
 30-31 Vic, cap. 3, (Imp.) ; 253. 
 
 33 Vic, cap. 36 D. ; 175. 
 33-34 Vic, cap. 35; i:io. 
 
 35 Vic, cap. 12, O. ; 167. 
 
 cap. 26 ; 173. 
 
 cap. 26, sec. 22, D. ; 173. 
 
 36 Vic, cap. 6 ; 43. 
 
 cap. 12S, D. ; 211, 213. 
 cap. 128, sec. 2 ; 214. 
 cap. 1 28, sec. 4, D. ; 211. 
 cap. 128, sec. 7, D. ; 212. 
 cap. 128, sec. 15, D. ; 211. 
 cap. 128, sec. 22, D. ; 211. 
 cap. 128, sec. 36, 37, D. ; 213. 
 
858 
 
 INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 Stahiiti— CoH/iNM/</- 
 36 Vic, cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 38 Vic, cap. 
 
 cap. 
 R. S. O.. cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 cap. 
 
 C'lp. 
 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 
 128. sec. 38. D. ; 213. 
 
 128. sec. 39, I). ; 213. 
 
 128, sec. 40. l). ; 213. 
 
 128. sec. 41, D. ; 213. 
 
 HH, sec. 16. D. ; 173. 
 
 88, sec. 18. D.; 172. 
 
 26; 225. 
 
 40, sec 4<j; 128. 
 
 73-74; 168. 
 
 55. sec. 35.; loi. 
 
 93: 43 
 
 94; 254- 
 
 95 ; 43. 75- 
 
 97; 4 
 
 98: 54. 69. 77. 
 
 98, sec. I ; I, 58. 
 
 98, sec. I, sub.-sec. 2; 77. 
 
 98, sec. 2; 77, 78, 91. 
 
 98. sec. 3 ; 77. 
 
 98. sec. 4 : 58. 
 
 98, sec. «) ; 79. 
 
 98. sec. 8 ; 254. 
 
 98. sec. 10 ; 26. 
 
 98. sec. lo-ii ; 255. 
 
 100; Hj. 
 
 102; 17. 71. 139. 
 
 102. sec. 4 ; 71. 
 
 if>j ; 17. i^, 118, 120. 
 
 104; 14. 104, 134. ijg. 198. 
 
 104. sec. 4; 139. 
 
 loO; 224. 
 
 ic)6, sec. 7 ; 226. 
 
 iu<), sec. S ; 247. 
 
 106. sec. 9. sub-sec. i : 225. 
 
 106. sec. 9. sub-sec. 4 ; 225. 
 
 lot), sec. 10; 225. 
 
 100, sec. 11; 2^5 
 
 106. sec. 12 ; 221, 244. 
 
 106, sec. 14 ; 245. 
 
 106, sec. 17 ; 241. 
 
 10(1. sec. 18 ; 241. 
 
 106, sec. 19, 241. 
 
 106. sec. 20; 246. 
 io(), sec. 21 ; 24«>. 
 loO, sec. 22 ; 246. 
 107; 251, 255. 
 
 107. sec 17 ; 122. 
 
 108. sec. 5 ; 43. 
 
 109 ; ;o. 33, 38, 72. 97. 
 
 i<K(, sec I , 76. 
 
 Ill ; 27. 29. 86, 153. 
 
 Ill, sec. 37 ; 21, 29. 
 
 Ill, sec. 44 ; 27. 
 
 Ill, sec. 48 ; 27. 
 
 Ill, Kcc. 67 : 143. 
 
 Ill, sec. 75 ; 247. 
 
 Ill, sec. 76 ; 29. 
 
 Ill, sec. 81 ; 103. 
 
 Ill, sec. 82 ; 88. 
 
 116 : 127, 160, 194. 
 
 I iC, sec 7 ; 1G5, 167, 16S. 
 
INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 359 
 
 Slalutet— Con tin ued- 
 Iv. S. O., cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 
 41 Vic, cap. 
 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 
 42 Vic, cap. 
 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 
 43 Vic, cap. 
 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 
 44 Vic, cap. 
 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap. 
 cap- 
 cap, 
 cap. 
 
 116, sec. 8; 256. 
 
 116, sec. II ; 186. 
 
 116, sec. 13 ; 194. 
 
 119 ; 47, 177, 188, 189. 193, 196, 209, 213. 
 
 119, sec. 5 ; 45. 
 
 1 19, sec. ^3 ; 206. 
 
 119. sec. 26 ; 213. 
 
 121, sec. I ; 194. 
 
 124 ; 255. 256. 
 
 125: 255. 
 
 126 ; 101. 152, 25C. 
 
 126 : sec. 3 ; loi. 
 
 127 ; 8. 
 
 128 ; 256. 
 
 128, SL-C. 4 ; 122. 
 
 129 ; 256. 
 
 130-131 ; 256. 
 
 132 ; 256. 
 
 135: 250. 
 
 13^. sees. 2-3 ; 118, 122. 
 
 136, sec. 8 ; 121. 
 
 136, sec. 9 ; 116. 
 
 130, sec. 10 , 117. 
 
 136. sec. II ; 117. 
 
 i3<), st'.c. 15 ; 118, 129. 
 
 165; 194. 
 
 167 , 254, 255. 
 
 168; 255. 
 
 17" : 255. 
 
 J7« : 255. 
 
 •72: 55- 
 
 i8y. sec. 7 ; 20. 
 
 2if): 255. 
 
 230, sec. 4 ; 123. 
 
 8 ; 119, 2(K). 
 
 8, sec. 5 ; 201. 
 
 25 : 255. 
 65 ; 172. 
 20 ; 150. 152. 
 2t>, sec. 4 ; 150. 
 20, sec. 9 ; 150. 
 20, sec. 10 ; 150. 
 22 ; 152, 256. 
 22, sec. 14 ; 174. 
 22, sec. 23 ; 174. 
 29 ; 255. 
 3(>- 255- 
 
 45 
 
 D. 
 
 171. 
 
 22, .sec. 45 D. ; 194. 
 
 42 D. ; 145, 140. 
 
 42, sees. 1-2 I). ; 145. 
 
 M 
 
 O. 
 
 90. 
 
 16 (). ; IJ2. 
 
 13 1^- : 256. 
 
 5 O. ; 50, 121, 168. 
 
 5. sc-c. 17 (). ; 64, 83. 132. 
 
 5. sec. 17. sub-sec. 6 O, ; 171. 
 
 10 (). ; 154. 
 
 12 O. ; 201. 
 
 14 (). ; loi. 141, 151. 
 14 U., sec. I U. ; 132. 
 
860 
 
 INDEX TO TRBATIBB. 
 
 SlatlHtt— Con tin ued— 
 
 44 Vic, cap. 14 O., sec. 2 O. ; 152. 
 cap. 15 O. ; 256. 
 cap. 16 O. ; 256. 
 cap. 16 D. : 194. 
 
 Statulat and Statute of Frauds— 
 
 4th section, provisions of, 57. 
 
 17th section, provisions of, 186, 
 
 What is sufficien*. writinK to satisfy 17th sac., 187. 
 
 What are goods, wares and merchandise within 17th sec. 
 
 Statutai of Mortmain, 6, 15. 
 
 Stoek Exehango— 
 
 Practice of, in Enj^land, 172, 
 
 Stocks and Shares— 
 
 Conditions of assignment of, 171. 
 
 Surrender- 
 In law what, 130. 
 Express must be by deed, 131. 
 
 Surveys- 
 All subsequent to crown registered, 36. 
 Collected cases on crown, 86. 
 
 137. 
 
 Taekino— 
 
 what is, 164. 
 
 Now abolished, 164. 
 
 Taxes- 
 Arrears of — Search to be made for. 44. 
 Things necessary in sale for, 42. 
 Who are proper conveying parties, 43. 
 
 Tenancy— 
 
 At will, 112. 
 
 From year to year, 112. 
 
 Notice necessary to determine, 112. 
 Determination of — 
 
 By forfeiture, 128. 
 
 When lessor loses right to re-enter, 128. 
 
 By effluxion of time, 129. 
 
 See Notia' to quit. 
 
 See Surrender. 
 
 Tenant— 
 
 Pur autrt vie, 81. 
 For life. 81. 
 In fee tail, 84. 
 In fee simple, 85. 
 
 Tenement — 
 
 What is a, 178. 
 Why so called, 1 78. 
 
 Testators- 
 Duties cf solicitor who has doubts as to sanity of, 218. 
 Who may or mav not have disposing power, 220. 
 What is undue influence over, 220. 
 Disubilities of certain persons <is, 224. 
 Disability of married woman, 230. 
 See Wills. 
 
INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 8iU 
 
 Timb«r Marhi— 
 
 How assiijned, 173. 
 
 THta - 
 
 I'aper not generally sufficient, 36. 
 
 Caution as to tax deed, 36. 
 
 Hy |H>ascssi(in, 37, 
 
 Effect of disability — lunacy on, 37. 
 
 Must be continuous, 37. 
 
 Whore adverse party patentee of crown, what necessary, 37. 
 
 By will. 38. 
 
 Hy inheritance, 3g. 
 
 What is sufficient proof to conveyancer of heirship, 39. 
 
 Uy |X)wer of sale inquiry concerning notice necessary, 40. 
 
 See vesting order. 
 
 See hi pendens. 
 
 See mechanics' lien. 
 
 See tax title. 
 
 See personal property. 
 
 Trade Marks and Designs- 
 Assignable by written instrument. 174. 
 Registered with minister of agriculture, 174. 
 
 Trustees— 
 
 Definition of, 7. 
 
 Power to convey, 7. 
 
 What deeds from, should show, 7. 
 
 Same persons should be executors and, 229. 
 
 u 
 
 Under Lease- 
 Should be, for whole term less one day, 161. 
 Should correspond with conditions in original lease, 162. 
 Covenants in, construed the same as in original lease, exceptions to, 
 162. 
 
 Under-lessee— 
 
 Not responsible to first lessor on the covenants, 161. 
 
 Vendor— 
 
 In absence of stipulation must verify abstract at his own expense, 
 103. 
 
 Entitled to interest, from time purchaser should have taken posses- 
 sion, 103. 
 
 Lien of. 102. 
 
 Taking mortgage loses lien, 102. 
 
 Now has no lien for unpaid purchase money, 102. 
 
 Vendor and Purchasers Act, 33- 
 
 Recitals 20 years old proved by, unless inaccurate, 33. 
 
 Vesting Order- 
 Generally made, when, 40. 
 
 What necessary to be proved, when occurs in title, 40. 
 No covenants in, 41. 
 
862 
 
 INDEX TO TREATISE. 
 
 i 
 
 I 
 
 w 
 
 Waivtr- 
 
 Kfliect of, 1 28. 
 
 WmI«- 
 
 VVhat is, 82. 
 
 Wills- - 
 
 Not an assurance, i. 
 
 Same law for realty and personalty. 2. 
 
 Thirty years old prove themselves, 38. 
 
 Hints in drawing, aiO. 
 
 Soundness of mind necessary in making, 216. 
 
 Who should draw, 2^3. 
 
 What may be disposed of in, 2^4. 
 
 Speik from death, 225. 
 
 Instructions for drawing, 22r). 
 
 Memo, of contents should contain, what, 227. 
 
 Charity bequests and devises in, 231. 
 
 (lifts in, to be guarded against, 231. 
 
 Restrictions on beciuests or devise. See Alif nation. 
 
 Advantage of residuary clause in, 235. 
 
 Remarks on form of, 236. 
 
 Paper held sufficient in form, 236. 
 
 Advisable to have attestation clause. 240. 
 
 Points to which attention should be paid. 240. 
 
 Requirements as to execution of, 241. 
 
 Witnesses to, who should not bo, 241. 
 
 Seal generally unnecessary in, 242. 
 
 Signature to, what suHicient, 243. 
 
 Witnesses should sign, but need not see testator sign, 245. 
 
 How revoked, 246. 
 
 Need not be registered, 247. 
 
 Probate of. See Probate. 
 
 Wilis Act- 
 
 Wills defined by, 225. 
 
 WHnesses— 
 
 One generally sufficiert, 23. 
 
 When two necessary, 22, 26. 
 
 Qualilications of, 26. 
 
 May be compelled to prove execution of deed, 27. 
 
 To wills, 241. 
 
 Writs- 
 Should be searched in sheriff's office, 44. 
 What sheriff s cerliticate of, should show, 44. 
 
 ■I 
 
 '^- 
 
INDEX 
 
 TO THE 
 
 PRECEDENTS, FORMS AND REFERENCES, 
 
 Abstracts (Solicito-s) - 
 
 Arrangement of J^eils in, 267. 
 
 Hirths, inarriaK s and deaths, 267. 
 
 Consideration in deeds, 267. 
 
 Execution and attestation of deeds, 2C8. 
 
 (jeneral words in deeds, 2O8. 
 
 Habendum, " 268. 
 
 Intestacy how noticed, 268. 
 
 Memoianda what noticed, 268. 
 
 Names of parties, additions, etc., 267. 
 
 t arcels, 267, 
 
 Powers, etc., 267. 
 
 Proceedings in the High Court of Justice, 268. 
 
 Provisos and conditions, 2f)S. 
 
 R. S. O., cap. log, as to titles, 268-9. 
 
 Receipt clause, 268. 
 
 Reddendum, 268. 
 
 Statement of facts to accompany, 2O8. 
 
 Testatum clause, 267. 
 
 Title by possession, 269. 
 
 Wilis. 268. 
 
 Affidavit- 
 
 ISills of sale — Bargainee, 305. 
 Chattel mortgages — Mortgagee, 307. 
 Free grants, location, etc., 276-7-8. 
 Registration of deeds, 265. 
 wills, 266. 
 
 Agreement- 
 Formal parts, 270. 
 Mortgage, 271. 
 Sale of land, 270. 
 
 conditions of sale, 273. 
 Recital of, 262-3. 
 
 to accept composition, 261. 
 
 Alienation- 
 Restrictions as to the free grants, 274-5. 
 What interests in land capable uf, 274. 
 
864 
 
 INDKX TO TIIR PRKCKDP.NTM, 
 
 AlitNt- 
 
 (Sce Undfr Naturatitrttion). 
 
 AppraiMRiMt. 2m. 
 
 See Vndtr Ditlrest. 
 
 Aniflnmtnit-' 
 
 ChoHen in action, 298. 
 Copyright. 3<>M. 
 
 Interim, 399. 
 Oeneral form, 394. 
 InduHtiial designs, 301. 
 LeaschuUlii, 31)4. 
 
 recitals of, 3f)a. 
 Mortgagea — Land, 29^). 
 
 — Chattels, 297. 
 I'atent — Before issue, 300. 
 
 After issue, 300. 
 
 Su I render of, 300. 
 Statutes afTectinK. 294. 
 Timl)er marks, 303. 
 Trade marks, 301. 
 
 AHtttation- 
 
 By an Attorney, 263. 
 a blind |>erson, 2^)3. 
 corporation, 266. 
 deaf and dumb party, 2C4. 
 Marksman, 264. 
 In abstracts, 268. 
 codicils, 313. 
 deeds, 263. 
 wills, 311. 
 
 AUoriMy— Power of— 
 
 Attestation clause, 263. 
 Testimonium, 264. 
 
 Auetiont— 
 
 Statute law as to, 271. 
 Recital — Sale by, 259. 
 
 B 
 
 Bailirt Sale- 
 Appraisement, 286. 
 Appraisers oath, 286. 
 Distress warrant, 285. 
 Inventory, 287. 
 
 memo, endorsed, 287. 
 Notice of sale, 287. 
 
 Bills of Sale- 
 
 Afiidavit of bargainee, 305. 
 
 Form under K. S. O., cap. 119. 304. 
 
 Chattel Mortgages— 
 
 (See Mortgages). 
 
 Chose in Action- 
 Assignment of, 298. 
 
 dim 
 
FORMS AND RKFKRKNCF.S. 
 
 8C5 
 
 Codieil to Will. 31'- 
 
 Kccital— Not afTecting ilevia . 
 
 362. 
 
 CompotMon— 
 
 Kfcilalu— ARrrement to accept, afn. 
 Inability to pay tiubtii, 261. 
 
 Con<lltiont ol 8al« - 
 
 .\Krfcmeiit apprndeil to, 27J. 
 (!unilitinnH used by MiKh Court, 272. 
 Special conditions, 273. 
 Statute law as to, 271. 
 
 CMvtyanen— 
 
 Statutory— Chattels, .^04. 
 
 Leaseholds, 28). 
 MurtKaKCS, 288. 
 Sales, 279. 
 
 Corporaliont— 
 
 Attestation, 254. 
 
 Declaration under R. S. ()., cap. 167, 254 
 
 Execution for purposes of registration , 266. 
 
 Mortmain Acts, 281. 
 
 Recitals Mechanics' Institute, 262. 
 
 R. S. {)., cap. U)7, -'•>3. 
 Testimonium clause, 2f>4. 
 
 Mechan"';s' Institute, 265. 
 Religious Institutions, 266. 
 
 Covenants- 
 Assignable 283. 
 In abstracts, ^oK. 
 
 assignment of chattel mortg.iges, 297. 
 choses in action, 298. 
 leaseholds, 294. 
 mortgages, 296. 
 bills of sale, 304. 
 chattel mortgages, 306. 
 conveyances by executors, 280. 
 
 married women, 281. 
 under power of sale, 279. 280. 
 gifts of personal property, 303. 
 leaseholds in statutory lease, 283. 
 mortgage of freeholds, st.itutory, ^88. 
 mortgage of leaseholds, J83. 
 sales of land, statutory, 279. 
 surrender of lease, 287. 
 under lease, J85. 
 Usual, added in statutory lease, 284. 
 
 Crown, 253, 254. 
 
 Doelaration of Incorporation— 
 
 Under the Act respecting benevolent and other societies, 234. 
 
 Oovite— 
 
 Residuary clause, 312. 
 
 on condition, 311. 
 Specific bequests, 311. 
 Trust estates, 312. 
 
306 
 
 INDEX TO THE PRECKUENTS, 
 
 Fll 
 
 Oischarne of iNortgiges— 
 
 Chattels, jchj. 
 Land, 2<j2. 
 
 partial, 293. 
 
 Distress Warrant— 
 
 (See Baililf's sale). 
 
 E 
 
 Executors and Trustees— Appointment in V. ills, 311. 
 Recitals —Sale, J51). 
 
 Purchase, 259. 
 Sales by, 280. 
 Statutes aftecting, 255. 
 
 F 
 
 Free Grants- 
 Act a|)plies only to men, 275. 
 Aftidavits — Location, 276. 
 
 children, 277. 
 Issue of patent, 27S. 
 Summary of the Acts, 275. 
 
 Gifts — Choses in possession, 303. 
 
 G 
 
 H 
 
 Husband and Wife- 
 Conveyances by married women, 2S1. 
 
 inter se, 2S1. 
 Recitals — as to living separate, 262. 
 Statutes affecting, 255-6. 
 
 Industrial Designs- 
 Forms as to, 301. 
 
 Infants- 
 Guardianship — Marriage, etc., 356. 
 Ratification of promises. 256. 
 
 Leases- 
 
 Appraisement, 286. 
 Appraiser s oath. ^8G. 
 Assignment of lease, 294. 
 
 recital of, 262. 
 
FORMS AND REFKRENCE8. 
 
 Lsases — Coulhiiied — 
 
 Bailills sale, -87. 
 
 Claim as to renewal, 2S4. 
 
 Covenants aa to bankruptcy, etc., 2,S4. 
 
 seizure or 'e.\ecution, j8j. 
 Distress warrant, JS5. 
 Inventory. 280. 
 
 Memo, to be endorsed on inventory, 287. 
 Notice to claim double rent, 285. 
 quit (landlord), 2S5. 
 (tenant), 2S3. 
 Recital of lease. 2(n. 
 Statutes affecting, 2>Sj. 
 Statutory lea.se. jSj. 
 
 Act respecting. 28J. 
 Surrender of lease, 2S7. 
 Underlease. 28.^. 
 
 Leaseholds - 
 
 Mortgage of, 289. 
 Assignment of, 294. 
 
 Letters of Administration— 
 
 Recital of, 216. 
 
 807 
 
 M 
 
 Majority- 
 Recital of, attaining, 260. 
 
 Marriage- 
 Intended marriage, 261. 
 Recital of, 200. 
 
 Married Women- 
 Conveyances by, 28 1. 
 Discharges of mortgages by, 288 
 Statutes affecting, 233-6. 
 
 Mortgages {Chattels)— 
 
 Affidavit of Mortgagee. R. S. O., cap. 119, 107 
 Assignment of, 207. ^ J' :i i- 
 
 Conveyance, 306. 
 
 endursemnt, 308. 
 
 future advances, 309. 
 Discharges, 309. 
 Renewal^.. 309. 
 Statutes respecting. 304. 
 Vessels. 310. 
 
 Mortgages (Land)— 
 
 Agreement for, 271. 
 Assignment of, 29f;. 
 Discharge of, 292. 
 
 in part. 293. 
 Lea.seholds. 289 
 
 Notice of sale, (Statutory), 291. 
 (Short), 293. 
 Mortgages- 
 Recitals as to state of debt, 259. 
 
 of, 2*)l. 
 
 Statutes affecting, 288. 
 Statutory mortgage. 288. 
 Statute, short forms, 315, 
 
i 
 
 8G8 
 
 INDEX TO THE PRECEDENTS, 
 
 N 
 Naturalization. 256. 
 
 Certificate. 258. 
 Oath ofalle^i nee. 257. 
 residence. 257. 
 service, 257. 
 Notice- 
 Sale by bailiff for rent. 287. 
 Sale in inortfjage — statutory, 291. 
 Sale, short notice, 292. 
 To claim double rent. 285. 
 quit (landlord). 285. 
 (tenant), 285. 
 
 If 
 
 Parties- 
 Aliens, 256. 
 
 (See under Nitturalisation). 
 Corporations, 254. 
 Crown. 253, 254. 
 Husband and wife, 255. 256. 
 In abstracts, 267. 
 Infants, lunatics, etc., 256. 
 Trustees and executors, 255. 
 
 Patent— 
 
 Assignment after issue of. 300. 
 
 of entire or half interest in. 300. 
 Recital of letters patent, 2C2. 
 Surrender of, 300. 
 
 Personai Property- 
 Affidavit of bargainee under R. S. O. cap. 119. 305. 
 mortgagee under R. S. O. cap. iiy, 307. 
 Bill of sale under R. S. O. cap. 119, 304. 
 Chattel mortgage under R. S. O. cap. 119, 304. 
 Chattel mortgage (endorsement) under R. S, O. cap. iig, 308. 
 
 (future advances) under R. S. O. cap, 1 19, 309. 
 
 statement for renewal under R. S. O.cap. 119, 309. 
 Discharge of chattel mortgage, 309. 
 Ciift choses in possession, 303. 
 Sale of goods, 303, 304. 
 Vessels (sales and mortgages), 310. 
 
 Power Ot Sale- 
 Conveyances under, 279, 280. 
 Retitals, 260. 
 
 Powers- 
 Execution of, 268. 
 In abstracts, 267. 
 
 Piobate— 
 
 Recital, 260. 
 Renunciation — recital, 259. 
 
 Provisos and Conditions— 
 
 In abstracts. 268. 
 
 chattel mortgages, 306. 
 
 endorsement, 308. 
 leases, 284. 
 mortgages, 288. 
 mortgage of leaseholds, 289. 
 
FORMS AND REFEBENCES. 
 
 869 
 
 R 
 
 Recitals- 
 Agreement for a sale of land, 263. 
 Eartnership, 263. 
 iisband and wife to live apart, 262. 
 Agreement to accept conipuisition, 2O1. 
 Assignment of judgment debts, 263. 
 Attaining majority, 260. 
 Codicils not affecting devise of realty, 2O2. 
 Contract for loan, 262. 
 sale, 262. 
 Conveyance in trust for sale, 261. 
 
 Conveyances under the benevolent , provident and other societies, 363. 
 Execution of purchaser conveying, 259. 
 Inability to pay debts, 261. 
 In abstracts, 267. 
 Intended marriage, 261. 
 Lease, 261. 
 
 letters of administration, 261. 
 Letters patent, 262. 
 Marriage, 260. 
 Mortgage, 261. 
 Power of sale, 260. 
 Power to appoint new trustees, 260. 
 Probate, 260. 
 
 Purchaser bought as trustee, 259. 
 Renunciation of probate, 259. 
 Sale by auction, 259. 
 Sale etc. by Mechanics' Institute, 262. 
 State of mortgage debt, 259. 
 Valuation, 259. 
 
 Registration — 
 
 Affidavit for deeds, 265. 
 wills, 206. 
 
 Renewal clause- 
 In leases, 284. 
 
 Residuary clause, 312. 
 
 s 
 
 Sates of goods- 
 Bill of sale affidavit R. S. O., cap. 119; 304-305. 
 By bailiff. See bailifTs sale, .iSj. 
 Gift choses in possession, 303. 
 Vessels, 310. 
 
 Sales of land- 
 Act respecting short forms, 314. 
 Agreement for, 270. 
 Contract for recital, 262. 
 Conveyance by corporations, 281. 
 
 executors, 280, 
 
 husband to wife and vice versa, 281. 
 
 married woman, 281. 
 
 mortmain acts, 28:. 
 
 in trust for recital, 261. 
 
 o's.c. 
 
 24 
 
370 
 
 INDEX TO THE PRECEDENTS, 
 
 Sales of Imi— Continued— 
 
 Conveyances not under the statute, 279. 
 
 not under power of sale, 279. 
 
 usual form, 280. 
 Free grants, 274. 
 
 Affidavits for issue of patent, 278. 
 location, 276. 
 where children, 277. 
 Summary of act respecting, 275. 
 'Land' means, 274. 
 Statutory deed of conveyance, 279. 
 What interests in land may be sold, 274. 
 
 t 
 
 i 
 
 Stahrtes. references to— 
 
 Administrators, 255. 
 Aliens, 256. 
 Assignments, 294-297. 
 
 Copyrights, 298. 
 
 Industrial designs, 301. 
 
 Patents, 300. 
 
 Timber marks, 30a. 
 
 Trade marks, 301. 
 Auctions, 271-272. 
 B&. of dower, 288. 
 
 Hills of sale and chattel mortgages, 304. 
 Burial societies, 255. 
 Cemetery companies, 255. 
 Chose in action, 298. 
 Conditions of sale, 27 j. 
 Copyright, 298, 
 Corporations, 
 
 Benevolent and other societies, how incorporated, 254. 
 
 Conveyances by, 254. 
 
 Execution by, 266 
 Covenants running with the land, 283. 
 Discharges of mortgages, 288. 
 Dower, 256. 
 Double rent, 283, 
 
 value, 283, 
 Frauds in sales and mortgages, 272. 
 Fraudulent removal of goods, 283. 
 Free grants and homesteads, 274-275. 
 Husband and wife, 255. 
 Improvements under mistake of title, 269. 
 Industrial designs, 301. 
 Infants, guardians, custody, etc., 255. 
 
 Marriage, 255. 
 
 Ratification of promise, 255. 
 Inheritance, 269. 
 
 Interest, how stated in mortgages, 288. 
 Landlord and tenant, 2S3. 
 Lands etc. of the crown. 253. 
 
 sales of, 274. 
 Leases, statutory, 283. 
 
 written, to be by deed, 283. 
 Limitations of actions, 269. 
 Lodgers, goods of, 283. 
 Marriage of minors. 255. 
 Married women, 255-256. 
 
 bar of dower, 288. 
 discbarge of mortgage. 288. 
 
FORMS AND REFERENCES. 
 
 Statutes, references io— Continued— 
 Mechanics liens, 269. 
 Mechanics' Institutes, 255. 
 Merger, 288. 
 Mortgages of real estate, 288. 
 
 short forms of, 288, 
 
 chattels, 304. 
 
 vessels, 310. 
 Notice of sale, 291. 
 Mortmain acts, 281. 
 Naturalization, 256. 
 Notice of sale— mortgage, 291. 
 Overwhelming tenants, 283. 
 Patents, 300, 
 
 Personal property, 302-304. 
 Power of sale, 288. 
 Powers, execution of, 255. 
 Registrations of deeds, wills, 2G5-266. 
 Religious institutions, 265. 
 Sales, chattels, 304. 
 Land, 274. 
 Vessels. 310. 
 Seizure of goods of lodgers, 283. . 
 Set-off as to rent, 283. 
 Simplifying titles, 268-269. 
 Timber marks, 302. 
 Trade marks, 301. 
 Trustees and executors, 255. 
 Vessels, sales and mortgages, 3 to. 
 Wills, 311. 
 
 Statutory Conveyances- 
 Conveyances and mortgages (appendix), 314-315. 
 Leases, 283. 
 
 Surrender lease, 287. 
 Patent, 300. 
 
 371 
 
 T 
 
 Testimonium - 
 
 By power of attorney, 264. 
 Corporations, 264. 
 Mechanics Institutes, 2G5. 
 Ordinary, 264. 
 
 Timber marl(s, 302. 
 Trade mwrks, 301. 
 
 U 
 
 Underlease, 284. 
 
h: 
 
 li! 
 
 i 
 
 872 
 
 INDEX TO THE PRECEDENTS, ETC. 
 
 V 
 
 VesMls- 
 
 Sales and mortgages of, 310. 
 
 w 
 
 Will- 
 
 Abstract of. 268. 
 Codicil to, 312. 
 Devise of trust estates 312. 
 Residuary clause, 312. 
 Short form of, 311, 
 
 Witnessing— 
 
 Affidavit for registration deeds. 265. 
 
 wills, 266. 
 
 THE END.