'iu ^. V^'^-„Q. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 ^ 1^ IIIII2.2 U U4 I.I 11.25 Photographic Sciences Corporation m^m»m a mws ss ^issmsmmum»M3immu 33 WIST MAIN STMIT WnSTIR.N.Y. UStO (716)l72-4»03 m mtmsmm m MMn i i mmmmtmOt gtllfk CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historicai IVIicroreproductions / institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significancly change the usual method of filming, are checked below. Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur r^ Covers damaged/ D D D Couverture endommag6e Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaur6e et/ou pellicul6e Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque I I Coloured maps/ Cartes g6ographiques en couleur Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) D Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur Bound with other material/ Reli6 avec a'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La reliure serr^e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion le long de la marge intArieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutAes lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais. lorsque cela Atait possible, cet pages n'ont pas AtA filmAes. Additional comments:/ Commentaires 8uppl6mentaires. L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a 6t6 possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. I I Coloured pages/ D D D D D Pages de couleur Pages damaged/ Pages endommag^es Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restauries et/ou pellicul6es Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages ddcolordes, tachet6es ou piqu^es Pages detached/ Pages ddtachdes Showthrough/ Transparence Quality of print varies/ Quality indgale de I'impression Includes supplementary material/ Comprend du materiel suppl^mentaire Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, etc., ont M filmAes d nouveau de fapon d obtenir la meilleure image possible. This item Is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce documttnt est filmA au taux de reduction indiquA ci-dessous. 10X MX 18X 22X 26X 30X X 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X ] ails du tdifier une nage The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: Library of Congress Photoduplication Service The images appearing here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in keeping with the filming contract specifications. L'exemplaire filmA fut reproduit grdce d la gAn^rositA de: Library of Congress Photoduplication Service Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et de la nettet^ de l'exemplaire film6, et en conformity avec les conditions du contrat de filmage. Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed beginning with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. Ail other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impression. Les axemplaires originaux dont la couverture en papier est imprlmAe sont filmte en commenqant par lb premier plat et en terminant soit par la dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, selon la cas. Tous les autres exemplaires originaux sont filmfo en commengant par la premiere page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par la dernlAre page qui comporte une telle empreinte. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol ^^ (meaning "CON- TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la derniire image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbols — ► signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbole V signifie "FIN". Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc.. peuvent dtre filmAs A des taux de reduction diff^rents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre reproduit en un seul cliche, il est film6 d partir de I'anglo supArieur gauche, de gauche d droite, et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants illustrent la mAthode. rrata to pelure, nd n 32X 1 2 3 , 2 3 4 5 6 'ii^ REPORT I >, ) - ON A nr* TER FpR THE CITY OF WINNIPEG, MANITOBA, BY — RUDOLPH HERING. New Yoc^ A X X September, 1697. ... V .1 *< ■ r* -/ INDEX. Assiniboine River, Description of. .... . 1? " *' Purification and Softening of. 19 " Cost of Plant 20 " " Chemicals required 21 Artesian Wells, Description of ; . . . ; . . • 22 " Cost of Plant. 24 " Chemicals required 25 Analyses of Waters ;............,... \9 Conclusions from Pumping teat ... . . . , 5 Comparison of sources of supply . 31 Canadian Pacific Railway Well test 45 Description of present Water Works .i, , ., , t Daily Consumption estimated ...........>........ 12 Distribution system Proposed 34 •• " Cost of 37 Data assumed in Comparisons; &c , ,. 53 Hardness, how removed, &c . . 15 Introductory 3 Meters, Use of . . . .*. 13 Objectionable Features of Present Supply i 11 Pumping Experiments 4 Poplar Springs 6 " " 26 " ; " Cost of Plant 27 ",!..•, !,'f?'r Chemicals tfequired 26 Present .system. Utilization of 38 Ppymerits, Methods of Proportioning • 39 Prices, Labbr and Materials . . 54 Plates, at end of report ? . ■■ Soft Water, Advantages of. 14 Sources of Supply 17 Softening Waters, Dr. Button's Report 52 Utilization of Present System 38 Winnipeg River 6 " '• , , ,, 29 " Cost of Plant 31 i.l 1 11 19 20 21 22 24 25 49 5 31 45 r 12 34 37 53 15 3 13 11 4 6 26 27 26 38 39 54 14 17 52 38 6 29 31 msmfmmsmBmmmmftmmmsmmBmmsmmsmemmBimBsamm wmmmmwiBammmm^^mmmrfsmmmms^msmmmBmmmmmBmammBmmmmBSBmBmBm A Compliments of RUDOLPH HERING. Hydraulic and Sanitary Engineer. 100 WILLIAM STREET, NEW YORK. REPORT ON A Future Water Supply FOR THE CITY OF WINNIPEG, MANITOBA. BY- RUDOLPH HERING. X!>j^^„mH«^ New York, XXX Sejrtember, 1697. '■■^jtK ■t.^'.'5¥!!SSR" 4160 ..-Si, jtk-ilh. A. Jill. .lib..*. .iti..A A.. lit. .(Iii, ,,ili. .ih.jlli. .*«.,*. MclNTYRE Bros., Printers, Winnipeg. • ■•i|c i[f 'lii' ■%'■ i\\v itt' nv w W '':!•■ 'V W 'W V W'lf '11'' • •• ••• HH , -tit-isWWS?^'-' « 00 ^^i-^^^'iS^S £^;.T,'^y^.Viy-ni' T'''»-,' i ' ■'■- .^ ts. • ">. "S^ • • - • '\ ' \, ,' Vi> VJ U ''"'i 'II ' "' 'ii iii"iri[in'"T"i' 5% New YoiiK, August, 1897. T/iC Fire, Water and Light Goraviittee, of Win'/iipeg, Man. B. E. Chaffey, Esq., Chairman. Gentlemen: Complying with your request and in accordance with a resolution, passed by the City Council on February 22nd, 1897 that I make an examination and report on certain questions submitted, concerning the water supply and waterworks for the City of Winnipeg, I now beg leave to present the results of my investigation, I. INTPODUCTORY. The questions submitted were : (1) What is the best source of supply, taking into considera- tion the quantity and quality of the water ? (2) What are the best means of pumping, filtering, softening and distributing the water ? (3) What portion or the present system, if any, can be used to advantage in connection with the recommended system ? (4) A revision and approval of plans. (5) Subsequently another question was added by the Chair- man, npniely: What method of proportioning the payment for such works, is, in your opinion, most equitable and proper ? On my fvrrival in the City of Winnipeg on March 23rd, I met the members of your Committee, His Worship the Mayor and Col. H. N. Ruttan, City Engineer. Detailed information was then furn- ished me regarding the present status of the waterworks problem k s- i,-»«=»«w«a*««"!«mi««a«aMie5Ste»Bd(»ii3!^^^ ■■; ■. I 4 and also the results of the previous investigations and reports that had been made on the subject. Mr. Isaac CaDipbell.. City Solicitor, furnished me with some of the le^al facts in the case, and from Messrs. Nanton and Bissett, representing the Winnipeg Waterworks, I received data concerning these works as they now exist. During that visit the plant was inspected and a general examination made of the territory of the City with reference to the subject under discussion. By the courtesy of Mr. Wm. Whyte, General Superintendent of the Canadian Pacific Railway Company, it was mack The gradual dissolving of the limestone by the flowing water has caused the originally minute fissures to enlarge and multiply in numb r betweL the%oints where tli. rock has been penetra ed by the rain, river or lake waters and the Red River, where it now finds outlets and freely flows off". Any defi-'.iency in the water found in the Poplar Springs could therefore be made up by wells bored along the line of the co"d",t either near the Springs or between them and the City. (A profile of this conduit is shown on Plate II.) A report was made to the City Council in February, lS9i>, by Mr. Walter Moberly. C.E.. advor>r,ting the Winnipeg River as the best source of supply for the ^.i-y. , , ^ , His grounds for urging this source, which had also been urged by others are apparently that the supply is plentiful and the water soft. No engineering data existed by which the merits of Uitplan for supplying the City could be definitely a.cer a.ned and therefore it was determined to have a survey made of the best line along which a conduit could be built, also to make a personal i(59s?;lftSJs"^' g the amounts lonstration was t found to have I charpcter and 18 made to the to be excellent taken and sent 1 the University jroxiniate gaug- cated a flow of [)00 gallons per , and it was said wells were sunk iT Mountain, the similar to that quarries. There iween the moun- stone formation, ! solution makes ct with the rock, lowing water has and multiply in en penetrated by p, where it now liar Springs could le of the conduit, City. (A profile jbruary, 1S95, by leg River as the ,d also been urged (lentiful and the ch the merits of litely ascertained, ' made of the best make a personal visit to the river and to have the water analyzed. Tt was a favor- able time for a visit and for making an analysis, because the water was probably at its least good condition, owing to the large amount of vegetable matter foundin such iri vera during the latter part of the summer. (■ . , Colonel Ruttan, City Engineer, accompanied me on this inspec- tion made July 3lst: The profile of the route (Plate II) and the chemical analyses of the water (Appendix II) are attached to. this report. The present source of the City's public water supply is the Assiniboine River, and it is also available for supplying the city in the future. No inspection cf|this river was made by me, other than within the city limits, as several reports* had already been made thereon, and as little else could be gained from further in- vestigation. In case this source might bo found preferable to the others that have been proposed, it would be desirable to retain as much of the present waterworks plant as could be used to advantage in connection with new works. Another examination was therefore made of the pump house on August 5th, and an interview had with Mr. Bissett on August 7th. A brief description follows : The works are owned by The Winnipeg Waterworks Com- Eany, E. H. Bissett, Esq., Manager. The charter was granted ►ecember 23rd, 1880, but they were not put in operation until 1882. The franchise is exclusive, and was awarded for a terra of twenty years, therefore terminating December 23rd, 1900. The source of supply is the Assiniboine River. The intake and pumping station are located at Armstrong's Point on the north bank of the river just below Maryland street bridge, and near the lower end of Mulligan Avenue. The station consists of an old and a new plant adjoining each other and surrounded by ornamental grounds. The buildings and grounds are in good condition. A brick conduit or tunnel, 30 inches in diameter, draws the wau for the old plant from the edge of the low-water channel and discharges it into a pump-well under the engine room erected near the bank of the river. Its present condition was not ascer- tained. tt PooTNOTK ; Report on thn Afwinllmino Klvor iind Arteslun Wolls iw sources of supply Uy H N. ifiitiim, City KnKlneor. Ocloljcr 20ih, l«W. »!B«ies.t. >tf) V. aa y< ia-taS'jeS3^miiteB., 10 : lit: i ! When the works were inaugurated the pipes laid in the ground were cast-iron, apparently of good quality, but cast horizontally, and therefore they have uneven thickness. As they have turned and bored joints, no lead being used, they are also apt to allow of leakaple and later be bection is to be hich discharges inds per square is a larger sup- il, but adds that • Winnipeg will iped and perhaps ed is large com- re, the quantity head is probably md there appears is reasonable to in be materially Ing such leakage neters for private and the United g the water for metred. t among certain jient quantity of irposes ; but this bice of charging an allowance of sver quantity is eter rates, ntion to stint in very water user ics. Incidentally, ting Undue waste d therefore will in reducing the so, while furnish- D maintain only a still lower one at 13 night. Both the legitimate use of water, as well as the waste, dispose of larger quantities under high pressures than under low pressures. As you are about to change or re-arrange your water supply, it will therefore be a favorable time to introduce meters. Such introduction can be very strongly recommended to you. The following table gives the consumption anu pressure in several cities having conditions which allow comparison in one way or another with those in Winnipeg : CITY. London, England .... St. Petersburg, Russia . Hamburg, Germany . . Dublin, Ireland Providence, R. I Fall River, Mass Atlanta, G d this gives an maximum rate of !5 per cent above )ns for which the 'ide at the outset, , as may be found ,rts of the work ir a population of he day, liable at raft, and as the ler it comes from enintr works and iherefore, to have can be received I forced into the ny moment. Such ' of at least one len the population apacity should be waters near Win- e City's use, make the water is hard, in solution bicar- >th. The hardness n soap is added in oduced instead of n this account and ia in boiling water a community may !8S fuel is required, considerable. The nd tear of clothing become harsh and antity of tea that ,ke five cups with jion). The palata- 15 bility is often increased. The softening process does not make water insipid like distilled or rain water. There are two kinds of hardness : Temporary and permanent. The former is usually caused by the carbonates and the latter by the sulphates of lime or magnesia. Temporary hardness can be removed : 1st. By a sufficient quantity of soap. 2nd. By carbonate of soda (washing soda). The carbonate of soda unites with the bicarbonate of lime dissolved in the water, resulting in the formation of bicarbonate of soda and carbonate of lime. The former remains in solution and does not harden the water, the latter is precipitated as a fine, white powder, 3rd. By boiling. The bicarbonate of lime is decomposed by heat into carbonic acid, which escapes, and carbonate of lime, which is precipitated as a fine white powder. 4th. By a solution of freshly burnt lime, or lime-water. The carbonates of lime and magnesia are changed into mono-carbonates by the hydrate of lime uniting with the extra carbonic acid, which is either free or combined as bicarbonate in the hard water. The resulting insoluble mono-caTbonates deposit as a fine powder. Carbonate of lime is not entirely insoluble in water, and a small portion always remains in it. The soluble bicarbonates of lime or magnesia, having thus lost half their carbonic acid, are reduced to the same insoluble mono-carbonates and are also precipitated. This process, being the least expensive, is the one here recommended. Permanent hardness can be removed : 1. By a sufficient quantity of soap, as before. 2. By carbonate of soua. The soda in this case unites with the sulphate of lime or magnesia dissolved in the water, resulting in the formation of the neutral and inert sulphate of soda, and the insoluble carbonate of lime or magnesia. The former remains in solution and does not harden the water, the latter is precipitated as a fine, white powder. In cool v/ater the presence of free car- bonic acid, or of bicarbonates, interferes somewhat with this reaction ; but the combined lime-and-soda process obviates this difficulty to a large extent. As permanent hardness is usually present with temporary hardness, the lime and soda can be mixed and together added to the water. To remove permanent hardness this process is the least expen- sive one for city supplies. 16 The soda should be dissolved and the «ol"{;«" ,*^''J"Sj;!y mixed with the water to be softened. The hme should be freshly burnt aL added not as milk-of-lime. but as lime-water. Accurate nroSortrons c^be more readily obtained with the atter than with FKr^r The precipitate settles slowly and in practice it is Jound best to s rain it out of the water by filters The solid Srbonates are then either allowed to settle and Jry, and are removed by excavation, or they are at once passed through hi er presses the water draining tVom the precipitate often contains sufficient lime in solution to be used over again. If the work of softening is properly done there is no tree lime left i the 8o?tene1 water. TheUtening with lime ^nllin^^^^^^^^^^ al y also remove a certain quantity of iron contained m the water. It has also the effect of removing some organic matter. Cloths may not filter efficiently until a thin layer of deposit or caused bv hydrate of magnesia, which is net cryf^-lliue, or oy orSc niaUerf the speed is°rapidly lessened, and the cloths soon S UD Td therefore require more frequent washing. In such a S seKg tZs shoulS be -d to accompHsh the heavy part of the work bifore the water is passed through the filters^ Soda is somewhat destructive to cloth. When there is much of it contained in the water, cloth filters may not be economical. After considering this preliminary information, the V^^^^'om submitted to me by four Chairman were carefully considered . a the licht of the facts before me. In answer thereto the following conclusions have presented themselves : i :1 Mumuummmtm mKmiiK^ii _^i 'I II ition thoroughly should be freshly -water. Accurate 5 latter than with in practice it is liters. The solid nd jdry, and are ised through filter ate often contains ere is no free lime lime will incident- ined in the water, tatter. in layer of deposit ice the sizes of the , glutinous nature, t crystalline; or by nd the cloths soon ashing. In such a 1 the heavy part of filters. 'hen there is much it be economical, ition, the questions fully considered in ms have presented MllliiKi II. SOURCES OF SUPPLY, PURIFYING AND SOFTENING THE WATER AND DELIVERING IT TO THE CITY. A. — Assiniboine River, The Assiniboine River is a branch of the Red River and dis- charges into the latter at Winnipeg. Its drainage area is about 58,000 square miles and is almost all prairie land. The annual rainfall upon the area is estimated at 18 inches per annum. The maximum flow is given as 1.0283, the minimum flow as ,016, and the ordinary flow as .044 cubic feet per second per .square mile of drainage area. High water occurs in April and May, and low water in the early winter, from which time until spring the river is covered with ice and remain? at about the same level. The above fljw per square mile is very small, which is due partly to the small rainfall and partly to the great evaporation which takes place from so flat a watershed, on account of the low average degree of humidity prevailing in that part of the country. It has been intimated that Lake Manitoba may pertly drain into the Assiniboine River, but this can hardly be so, because its flow is much smaller per .square mile of drainage than that of most other streams, the flow of which is known. The river has but a slight fall and many sinuosities. Regarding the quality of the water it may be well to quote the reriiarks made by James Patterson, M.D., Chairman of the Board of Health, and H. N. Ruttan, Esq., Citj?^ Engincir, in their joint report on the condition of the Assiniboine River, dated Sep- tember 30th, 189C. •f-r 18 " On the settled portions of the river, on account of the higher " land of the banks affording drier building sites '^T^^^it " in" shelter and the convenience to water in the river toi stocK m " Anil' a r the dwellings, barns and stock yards are placed upon "he innnediato banks, and it is the almost "n^^^--^/ P^j^^^f^, fj^^;^ "residents to use the river as a dumping place for all kinds of retuso "and offal Manure is got rid of by throwing it into the river. "Surface washings from^arnyards. stockyards and hogpens during " everv rahif all find their way into it directly by natural ravines or "Scial ditls, whilst the'soakage from all is cont-ualy going " on In fact the river is used as the common sewer of the country. "The number of persons per square mile in the Assmiboine " wate shed robably does not exceed h person per square mile at " Te prosent^ime, a number so small that under ordinary circum- " stLcerthey would have no appreciable influence in the sewage .< ntaminatfon of the stream but of more -por ance on accoun "of the loner narrow shape of the river lots; the location of their " dweUinS^out-buildings and yards; the large proportion of stock " kl bfeach and the common mode of disposing o manure "insteadof Sa it as a fertilizer. While, there ore, there is no <'Lround for p "sent alarm from this cause, the indications ave that "Ke not distant future, as settlement increases. mo.st stringent "measures will have to be enforced^ to^ prevent a continually m- " creasinc pollution of this stream, " Between Portage la Prairie and Winnipeg the river banks .Kisim:,!tt.' r»mvmMt'iH i i^»*t- •unt of the higher the woods afford- river for stock in s are placed upon sal practice of the all kinds of refuse it into the river, id hogpens during natural ravines or continually going I'er of the country, in tlie Assiniboine per square mile at r ordinary circum- ence in the sewage ortance on account le location of their sroportion of stock iposing of manure erefore, there is no ndications aie that ises, most stringent it a continually in- eg the river banks cept the lowest, are that for six months great quantities of ot sediment carried jectionablc feature.' Id be made, would e River water are f the river is high «'s through a lime- loid ammonia is duo H, stems and roots, 'able and docs not icli fact is shown by d in the water. MMMM MM 19 The attempts made, up to the present time, to purify the Assiniboine River water have only been partly successful. The filters, as already mentioned, do not operate satisfactorily, and sometimes are entirely useless, In order to render the Assiniboine River water satisfactory as a public water supply it should be purified and softened. Purification can only be obtained by the use of settling basins and filters. Filters alone will not be successful. This is due, partly to the irregular character of the water, being sometimes quite clear, and at other times very muddy and carrying in sus- pension much fibrous organic ftiatter. For the same reason it has not been found satisfactory to clarify the Citissouri and lower Mississippi waters by passing them through filters alone. Settling basins, arranged so as to allow the suspended matter, in its greater part, to subside, are a necessary preliminary to obtaining clear water. The water must subsequently be filtered so that not only the slight turbidity which will remain is removed, but also the organic matter and the objectionable bacteria. It is not neces-sary in this case to adopt slow sand filters, such as are used for most of the European water supplies, as the water has not a sufficiently high bacterial pollution to favor such a pro- cess. Rapid mechanical filters will answer the purpose and render the water, after it leaves the settling basin, entirely clear, and there need be no difficulty in their operation. These mechanical filters should operate under a slight head securing a constant flow, rather than under high pressure and a varying flow, as at present. ThQ water of the AssiniboVae River can bo softened, so as to make it serviceable for washing purposes, by the addition of a solution of lime and soda. These materials could be added while the water is being pumped into the settling basin. Here the car- bonates removing the hardness are precipitated, together with the bulk of the suspended river silt and organic matter. The water is thus partially clarified. Subsequently it is pa.ssed through filters to be thoroughly clarified, as mentioned above. It is estimated that for the purpose of clarifying a daily supply of 2,400,000 gallons tho settling basins should have a capac- ity for at least half this amount, i.e., 1,200,000 gallons, or 192,000 cubic feet. It would be well to have a division into at least four basms giving each one a capacity of 48,000 cubic feet. Allowing the water to stand 15 feet deep, each basin would have an area of 8,200 square feet. They should bo covered so as (1 ,1!,' I; 20 to W pvotectea from the influence of frost. These assumptions „"i'ht^require modification when the reservoir is located. " Aftc.- passing the settling basins the w^^^J. -°"^ ^/J^^^^^^^^ .ntomochallical gravity filters ^ rate f^^^^^^^^l^^;;, LiS; ::ula «^8lJf 5„. of th. filter, would be eonimu- allv out of service for cleaning. . ^ From these filters the water would flow into the reservoir and thence be pumped into the distributing system. The water used for washing the filters and settling basins, as weU I thrsediment from the latter, would be earned back into ^^'' 'to avoid the necessity for large settling basins it has recently been proposed to use fllte'rs having «P--"y -^«^f ?,^«^ ^S "*' r r a„„i. tiU.i>rR are now m use in Elmira, iN.i.. uurmu, T^'lT Kansas C^y Mo Whether or not they ultimately " "Il'l';«':te of large .ettUng b«i»..ihe cost of «,. plant is estimated as follows : Land for pumping stations, settling basins, filter- ^ ^ ^^^^ ing plant, etc g'.OOO S^^EXaiulfouniationfo^machi^iery 20^0 Pulifgt'aci;ine;y.withboile;plantforpower and heating, two vertical triple expansion pumps and two horizontal simple .luplex ^^^^ pumps . • • S 000 s^at^^^rts^s ""••'■ -°"-'"«' ■■'■■■ i^ Mechanical filter plant ^'^^ Drains for waste water ' H1.S50 Contingencies and engineering, 15% __^^^ f 103,130 -- 'tew.*t«|4*' (WvW*^ 'iSiWlW*" l.X. ^ J a i^, - . -HfJJ t A . ^- . M .«fl tf . (rttM aii . hese assumptions located. would be lifted )0 cubic feet per ring 1280 square eiency the rate of ave estimated for r. The head re- would be continu- ) the reservoir and settling basins, as carried back into sins it has recently onstructed set-tling Imira, N.Y., Lorain, )t they ultimately ng the Assiniboine ice with such filters ;he cost of the plant filter- 9 4,0(10 2,000 hinery 20,000 • > • • • 5,050 power ansion duplex 31,800 8,000 40,000 35,000 1,000 H1,S50 21,280 f 163,130 21 Assuming the use of filters with small settling compartments attached, this figure would be reduced by the cost of two pumps and the large settling basins, and increased by the cost oi' a g-reater number of filters of larger size. The cost of this plant would be about $123,000. The chemicals required for softening the daily quantity of water (2,400,000 gallons) and for precipitating the suspended matter, are estimated as follows : Lime 6720 lbs. at \ cent 316 80 Soda Carbonate, 960 lbs. ^t 1 cent 9 CO Alum 600 lbs. at 2 cents.... 12 00 $38 40 The daily cost of operating the softening plant and mechanical filters, removing the sediment and organic impurities from the settling basin, and repairs, is estimated at $10.00 per million gallons, or 24 00 Pumping 2,400,000 gallons into the Distribution Reservoir , 19 60 Daily operation of softening, filtering and deliv- ering into Reservoir $82 00 Therefore, the annuiii expense for purifying and softening the Assiniboine River water to the ext-^nt of 2,400,000 gallons per day, and of delivering it into the Distribution Reservoir, would be : Interest on cost of plant, at 4 per cent $6,525 Repairs and renewals of buildings and machinery, 2,000 Operation of softening, purifying and pumpinw, at $82.00 per day *. 30,075 $38,6 u ^„ . . ^g^ks are bcated north of the K^tt,n°G oLT,'th:draiLtu7d°^ into the ditch now runmn' aJong^e of the Selkirk Branch of the Canadian Pacitic Sway or would have to be built to the Red River. The cost of this plant is estimated as follows : Land for pumping station, softening plant and ^^^^^ wells " ' j'gQQ 5rKl°^/itrconnecting'pii>e.' laid in a brick con- ^^ ^^ Buildings forpumVs,' boilers, 'fuel and softening ^^^^ Chim^itj'and foundations "for" machinery 3,600 Softening plant and filters :;.• u' m" " Two horizontal triple expansion pumps, with boiler plant for power and heating, ete l/.'J^ Drains for waste water • Deposit tank for precipitate ' ' ""'^^^ SU0,760 Contingencies and engineering, 15 per cent, ^1.120 $161,870 'i.t ■Hi V> Iways clear and As its hardness .ssiniboine River inary clarification )y the softening ftter. Instead of liters will answer have been used at Southampton, ir supply of San for the material ire probable that near the works. ba about six cubic washing out the it or drain to be ited north of the ito the ditch now Canadian Pacific ,iver. s : it and $3,500 1,500 ;k con- 57,500 'tening 25,000 3,600 25,000 li boiler 17,750 5,000 2,000 $140,760 cent, 21,120 $161,870 I 25 The chemicals required for softening the daily quantity of water (2,400,000 gallons) and for precipitating the suspended mat- ter, are estimated, according to Dr. Hutton's data (Appendix III), using the average amounts of chemicals given by him, as fol- lows : Lime 7800 lbs. at I cent $19 50 Soda carbonate, 1080 lbs at 1 cent 10 80 Alum 600 lbs. at 2 cents 12 00 $42 30 Labor for the softening plant and for repairs. ... 12 00 Pumping 2,400,000 gallons from the wells into the tanks (maximum lift) at the city distribution pumping station '. 12 00 Daily operation of softening and delivering into reservoir $66 30 Therefore, the annual expense of softening the artesian well water, to the extent of 2,400,000 gallons per day, and of delivering it into the distribution reservoir, would be : Interest on cost of plant, at 4 per cent s . . $6,476 Repairs and renewals of buildings and machinery 1,500 Operation of softening and pumping, at $66.30 per day 24,200 $32,175 To ascertain the net expense of softening this water, as against supplying it unsoftencd, I append an estimat' of cost for supplying it in its natural condition. There would be a deduction of $54,470, for decrease in the necessary land, size of buildings, puni[)ing and softening machinery, drains, deposit tank, and foundations. The total cost of the work is estimated at $107,400. The average daily cost of pumping, maintenance and delivery into the reservoir at the pumping station, is $12.00, or $4380 per annum. Therefore, the annual expense of delivering the natural artesi- an well water into the distribution reservoir would be : Interest on cost of plant, at 4% $4,296 Repairs and renewals 1,000 Pumping, at $12 4,380 $9,C70 —*»..-, nii ii r i nwn n iw r tn ii ,! 26 From the above figures it is computed that the daily cost of softening 2,400,000 gallons per day will be S6L64 Theretore, the cost of softening 1,000 gallons ot artesian well water is 2.57 cents. C— Poplar Springs, These springs are located to the north of the City and 17i miles therefrom. They have an elevation of 8 feet above the City The territory between is flat, as shown by the prohle attached hereto (Plate II), the greatest rise being 16 teet above the e.evation of the City, at 11 miles therefrom. • • ti The quantity of water, as gauged at the large spring in July, is about 2,800,000 gallons per day. It may be less later in the season and in the winter. , , . ■. • l i As stated above, it is probable that by bormg and intercept- ing, a much larger quantity of water of a similar character could be obtained. It is certain that the quantity first demanded by the City can be secured from the large spring alone and later, by reaching the other springs, or by intercepting sufficient artesian water between the springs and the City, the future average amount of 6 000,000 gallons per day can ba obtained. The water of the Poplar Springs is very clear, without organic pollution, and need not be purified. Its hardness is not as great as that of the city artesian water, nor as great as the Assmiboine River water, and according to Dr. Kenrick its hardness is only temporary and can be removed with lime alone. (Appendix 11.) While it is by no means a soft water, it might perhaps be considered sufficiently soft for ci^y use. Fo^rwashmg purposes it would be desirable to add some soda to it This should be done The day before using it. so that the precipitate will settle, the clear water can be poureS off for use. and the sediment thrown away If subjected to a softening pro. . ss by the City, the works should be located near the springs. The water would .there be lifted into a softening basin, receive the necessary chemicals and be filtered through cloth, as in the case of the artesian well water The water used in washing the filters could be led into a ditch near by. which now carries off the water of the springs. The distance from the City necessitotes the laying a conduit to it from the springs. It would be sufficiently large and durable o carry not onlv the quantity of water at once required, but the future quantity of 6,000.000 gallons per day. or 11.14 cubic feet ^^' ^Wooden stave pipe, if it is constantly under pressure, is. I believe, as good, in your climate and conditions, as iron pipe. It nnn i mHWiWBa -.■^. .. ..—jt ^ N'i^ y; * t the daily cost of J*. Therefore, the cater is 2.57 cents. f the City and 17 J ;eet above the City, le protile attached above the e.evation arge spring in July, be less later in the oriiig and intercept- ilar character could st demanded by the ilone, and later, by y sufficient artesian ure average amount ear, without organic 3S3 is not as great as , as the Assiniboine ts hardness is only e. (Appendix II.) 1 might perhaps be washing purposes it 'his should be done will settle, the clear ent thrown away, be City, the works iter would there be ssary chemicals and artesian well water. Id be led into a ditch le springs. ;he laying a conduit ly large and durable ce required, but the or 11.14 cubic feet uider pressure, is, I ns, as iron pipe. If 27 under pressure and not painted, the wood remains saturated, the sap is removed and decay postponed, if not entirely prevented. Such pipe will readily stand 100 feet pressure. The .steel bands used should be of the best material, of ample strength and care- fully made. They should be well coated with properly prepared asphalt. The total length required is about 92,400 feet, or 17.5 miles. The diameter should be 36 inches. The loss of head in this conduit due to friction is assumed at 0.329 per thousand, when carrying 6,000,000 gallons per day, and 0.064 ger thousand when carrying 2,400,000 gallons per daj*. In case a stave pipe is used, the friction might be slightly reduced. The necessary total lift to deliver the water of the springs into the City's reservoir is 31.5 feet for 6,000,000 gallons daily, and 11 feet for 2,400,000 gallons daily, not considering the special lift for the softening process, which is 10 feet additional in each case. There would probably be several summits in the pipe at which air-escape valves would be required. It is estimated that the top of the pipe is covered with at' least six feet of earth to prevent the water from freezing. The conduit would discharge into the dis- tribution reservoir in the City, fvora which, as in the other cases, the water would be pumped into the City mains. The cost of plant is estimated as follows : Lund for pumping station, softening plant, springs and pipe line $ 1,200 Preparing grounds 500 Developing springs, well, etc 3,000 Buildings for pumps, boilers and softening plant 25,000 Chimney and foundation for machinery 3,500 Dwellings for men 2,500 Softening plant and filters 25,000 Two horizontal compound condensing engines and two simple high pressure engines with boiler plant for power and heating 18,250 92,400 feet of 36 in. stave pipe, including valves, etc 388,000 Deposit tank for precipitate 2,000 468,950 Contingencies and engineering, 15 per cent .... 70,340 $539,290 mm-titmttmimMfi- ■ 28 Although requiring a smaller quantity of chemicals, the cost of softening would bfi nearly as much as softening the artesian well water, owing to the fact that but few parts of the plant could be reduced in size. The chemicals required, according to Dr. Button's average fi(Tures, for softening the daily average quantity of water (2,400,000 gallons) and precipitating the suspended matter, soda being omit- ted in this case, are estimated as follows : Lime, 6,6001bs. at i cent S16.50 Alum, 600 lbs. at 2 cents 12.00 $ 28.50 Daily cost of operating the softening plant, and repairs 1-00 Pumping water from the springs into the tanks and conduit (maximum lift) 24.00 Daily o^^eiation of softening and delivering into City reservoir > $64.50 Therefore, the annual expense of softening the Poplar Springs water, to the extent of 2,400,000 gallons per day, and of delivering it into the city distribution reservoir, would be : Interest on plant, at 4% • ^^^'"^J^ Repairs and renewals of buildings and machinery. 1,500 Operation of softening and pumping, at $64.50 per day • • 23,543 $46,615 To ascertain the net expense of softening this water, as against supplying it unsoftened, I append an estimate of cost for supplying it in it3 natural condition. There would be a deduction of $51,990 for decrease of size of buildings, in the number of pumps and omis.sion of softening plant, etc. The total cost of the work is estimated at $487,300. The average daily cost of pumping, maintenance and delivery into the city distribution reservoir is $18, or $6,570 per annum. Therefore, the annual expense of delivering the natural Poplar Springs water into the city distribution reservoir would be : Interest on cost of plant, at 4% $19,492 Repairs and renewr.ls 1.00^' Pumping, at $18 psr day 6,570 $27,062 i Miuml i iiim— ti l l 29 chemicals, the cost 'tening the artesian ts of the plant could r. Button's averajje y of water (2,400,000 ber, soda being omit- $16.50 12.00 $ 28.50 at, and 12 00 ; tanks 24.00 ng into $64.50 jg the Poplar Springs lay, and of delivering 3e : $21,572 lachinery. 1,500 at $64.50 23,543 $46,615 this water, as against I of cost for supplying for decrease of size of )mis.sion of softening mated at $487,300. ntenance and delivery $6,570 per annum, ing the natural Poplar I'voir would be : $19,492 1,000 6,570 $27,062 From the above figures it is computed that the daily cost of softening 2,400,000 gallons per day will be $53.57. Therefore, the co.st of .softening 1,000 gallons of Poplar Springs water is 2.23 cents. D, — Winnipeg River, The only object in considering^ this somewhat distant source, lay in the reputed natural purity and softness of its water. Instead of draining a limestone country, its water passes through a country of azoic rockp, such as granite and gneiss, which do not contain minerals that by solution materially harden the water. It is only necessary to tap the river and bring the water in its natural state into the City. The nearest point at which it can be reached is above the mouth of the Whitemouth River, a tributary fi'om the south, and about 54 miles from the City. It has been suggested to go below this point and take the water from Lac du Bonnet,- requiring a conduit perhaps 10 miles longer and a corresponding loss of head by friction. The only justification for this suggestion would be the advantage of allowing the suspended matter to settle in the lake by the reduced velocity of the water in pa.ssing through it, and thus to get clearer water. The turbidity of the water, existing during the latter part of the summer, is, however, mainly caused by very fine and light particles of vegetable matter, and most of these would probably remain in suspension, unless the water came to an absolute rest, which it does not. The additional expense of going to Lac du Bonnet would therefore not be justified by getting at best but a very slight improvement in the clearness of the water during a .short time in the summer. A .survey was therefore made from Brokenhead River to the nearest point where the river could be reached. Between the City and Brokenhead River the territory was sufficiently well known. The character of the water cannot vary much between the mouth of the English River and Lac du Bonnet, excepting that the Whitemouth River might somewhat decrease the purity below its mouth. Between the English and Whitemouth Rivers there are many rapids and falls, as well as bend.s, which vertically and laterally so thoroughly mix the water that its quality can be considered the .same anywhei'e in the current. The velocity being rapid th(! water must retain fine matter in .suspension. f If 1: I mill 1 1 li iiinaMBIfaflatfc. :fi:: I 30 The best point at which to take the water for the City is just above the mouth of the Whilemouth River. The Winnipeg River was examined as far up as three miles beyond this point. The water was carefully scrutinized It had a distinct brownish-yellowish color, was slightly turbid and full of hne suspended matter, which was evidently of vegetable ongia The water was frequently tasted. Its taste was not pleasant, and in- variably slightly bitter, which is usual in waters containing much vegetable matter. No doubt for perhaps 9 or 10 months in the year this water is clear and very palatable. Samples for analysis were taken near the point where an intake should be placed, and they well represent the average char- acter of the Winnipeg River water at that time The analyses flnpendix II) show a moderately good water, but a very high ptrSage of albuminoid ammonia, several times the quantity EtTs considered permissible in England for the dnnking water of that coui.try. But this high percentage, as already stated, is L to vegetable matter and is explained by the large areas of forests an3 muskegs situated on its drainage area. The very small percentage of free ammonia indicates almost no pollution by animal matter. i ^ -i. The plan (Plate III) and profile (Plate II) show the territory over whic^h the water wiuld \Le to be brought to the City The elevation of the Winnipeg River where it could be tapped is 843 feet above sea level. The lowest elevation at which a pipe line could cross the high land between the Winn peg -"d Brokenhead rivers is 940 feet, or 97 feet above the Winnipeg River. Frmn this point the pipe would fall 163 feet to the City reservoir, f he total length of pipe is about 285.000 teet. or 54- miles. The pipe should be sufficiently large and durable to carry, as cumated .efore, 6,000.000 gallons per day, or 11.14 cubic eefc per second. Due to the different gradients available, the diameter would be thirty inches from the Winnipeg River to Birds HiU, and 28 inches thence to the City. The loss of head in this conduit due to friction is assumed at 0784 per 1,000, when carrying 6,000,000 gallons per day. and at 145 per l.OOO when carrying 2,400,000 ga Ions per day. If stave pipe h used, the friction may be slightly reduced. There would be nuu.erous summits on this pipe line where air- escape valves would have to be provided. The pipe is supposed to be laid in the ground so that the minimum earth covenng would be Ci feet, or .so that its centre would be 7^ feet below the surface to prevent the water from freezing. The pipe would, ! i nwKii a Mm i iiiwmiiMWtf I f for the City is just rhe Winnipeg River this point. It had a distinct d and full of fine igetable origin. The not pleasant, and in- ers containing much or 10 months in the the point where an !nt the average char- time. The analyses er, but a very high times the quantity the drinking water IS already stated, is the large areas of irea. The very small pollution by animal I) show the territory rht to the City. The lid be tapped is 843 t which a pipe line peg and Brokenhead tinipeg River. Frcm 1 City reservoir. The 5+ miles. . durable to carry, as >r 11.14 cubic feet per iilable, the diameter River to Bird's Hill, friction is assumed at Ions per day, and at Ions per day. If stave uced. is pipe line where air- The pipe is supposed n earth cove-ing would 5 7^ feet below the a. The pipe would, 31 as in the other projects, discharge into the distribution reservoir in the City. It is found that the necessary total lift to deliver the water of the river into the City's reservoir, is 146 feet for 6,000,000 gallons daily, and 106 feet for 2,400.000 gallons daily. There is an ample quantity of water and depth of fall at the proposed intake to allow the pumping to be done by water- power. Yet, to build works for this purpose alone, and which would operate economically and without failure at both high and low water stages, would be a more expeHbive undertaking than to erect a steam pumping plant and use as fuel, wood which abounds in the neighborhood. The cost of th's plant is estimated as follows : Land for pumping station and pipe line S 2,600 Preparing ground and roads 1,500 Intake works, well, etc . , 1,000 Building for pumps and boilers , 6,000 Chimney and foundations 1,000 Dwellings for men 2,000 Two horizontal triple expansion engines, with boilers 19,500 Pipe line to City, 34 miles 1,246,700 1,280,300 Contingencies and engineering, 15 percent.. 192,100 $1,472,400 The pnnual expense of delivering the Winnipeg River water to the extent of 2,400,000 gallons per day, into the City dis- tribution reservoir would be : Interest on cost of plant, at 4 per cent $58,895 Repairs and renewals of buildings, pipe line and machinery 2,000 Pumping, at $25 per day 9,125 $70,020 E. — Comparison. It remains now to compare the several projects which have just been examined, us to the quantity and quality of their water, and as to their relative economy. Both the Assiniboine and Winnipeg Rivers are so large that even at fieasons of greatest drought they can supply sufficient water for the City. £S^S i4 i:;.} 32 The Poplar Springs deliver sufficient water for about 40.000 .!,« Rv Snkin<. wells along the line of the conduit this quan- Sv could b^ £eKeveral «^mes. and without question furmsh aufecient water for 100,000 persons. . The artesian well supply can likewise f--V.tv7o"Sk quantity. In order to obtain the same, it is only "^J.^jy f/^^J 2 sufficient number of wells in the western part of the City and extend them in a northerly direction. If we compare the natural waters as to P^^f ^^L^'fy-J"* irrespectTve of™heir softness, we may place them in the following °'***'' '' 1. Poplar Springs. 3. Winnipeg River 2. Artesian Wells. 4- Assmibome River If we compare them as to softness, we must give them the following order :^^^^^ 3. Assiniboine River. 2. PoplarVprings. 4- Artesian We Is. them in the followiag order : . . • w lu 1. Poplar Springs. 3. Arte.uin Wells 9 Winnipeg River. 4. Assmibo.ne River. Tf the hard waters are softened by a chemical process and the projects, as follows : . ^ 1 Poplar Springs. 3. Assmiboine River. 2 Arfe wells. 4 Winnipeg R.ver. Theccstof softening 1.000 gallons of water in the several projects is as follows : ^ 1. Assiniboine River 2.22 cent . 2. Poplar Springs ^^'^ «^"J«- 3. Artesian wells 2.57 cents ■ These differences of cost are .so slight as to have hardly any woiffht in deciding upon the preference. , „. u,,„ The "ost of softening any of the Winnipeg waters a^ here determined, is not so gi4t. in -y. ^-^'^.'^t in^E^d. U adoption, although it "^"^V^'^Llllons Ttrr per day the est ftfainilyof five persons use 300 gallons. uw^^^^^^ cent per day. t^*iSM'' L "-''"-^ ■■'j'BJiy.'-'?'«'S™^SK -, er for about 40,000 ! conduit this quan- ut question furnish rnish the required y necessary to sink art of the City and lo palatability, but em in the following ipeg River. iboine River. must give them the iboine River, ian Wells. iiess of these waters, 3I i lolined to place lian Wells, liboine River, lical process, and the Ul consider the order bhfulness of all four niboine River. mipeg River. water in the several 2.22 cents. 2 2M cents. 3.57 cents. I to have bardly any lipeg waters, as here I, as to prevent it.s cost in England. If ater per day tbe cost in one cent per day. ;ess would reduce tbo 33 carbonate of lime from 28 to 17 grains per gallon, a reduction of 11 grains. If we assume approximately that each grain of car- bonate of lime per gallon increases the amount of soap necessary for 100 gallons by 2 ounces, then, if sufficient soap is ordinarily added to make the water soft, the softening process proposed for the City would save IJ pounds of soap per 100 gallons of water used for washing purposes. Comparing the projects as to cost, I shall state them, fir.st, in the order of the necessary capital which must be expended at the outset, to deliver the water into the city reservoir : NATURAL WATERS : 1. Artesian Wells 8 107,400 2. AssiniboineRiver, filtered, ($119,440),... 159,-570 3. Poplar Springs 487,300 4. Winnipeg River 1,472,400 SOFTENED WATERS : 1. Artesian Wells S 161,870 2- Assiniboine River, filtered, (S123,000) .... 163,130 3. Poplar Springs 539,290 The figures given in parenthesis cover the cost of u.sing filters that have settling compartments attached to them, thus obviating the use of large settling basins. The Artesian well project, it will be seen, requires tho least outlay, both when the water is softened, and when it is delivered in its natural state, excepting in the case where settling compart- ments are substituted for large settling basins in the Assiniboine River soft water project. Secondly, the.se projects are given in the order of annual expense, including both interest on outlay and cost of operation. NATURAL WATERS ; 1. Artesian Wells S 9,670 2. Assiniboine River, ($15,968) 19,133 3. Poplar Springs 27,062 4. Winnipeg River 70,020 SOFTENED WATERS. 1. Artesian wells $32,175 2. Assiniboine River ($34,195) 38,600 3. Poplar Sprnigs 46,615 This comparison indicates that the artesian well supply is the least expensive, whether natural or softened water is supplied. j^mjttmttmt J, ^j^-f^i^ni^UaiiieBr- S4 XI NcxtinoiJerisfche Assiniboine River supply. Using small set- Sing compartments attached to the filters the annual cos^s reduced several thousand dollars. Owing to tl^7°«»«^hat ex^en- mental character in the use of such ('"'"P*'.^™^"*'^' / PT^J^Ji^or ever at the present time to use the larger figure for comparison. The greater cost of the Assiniboine River project is accom- panied also with the disadvantage, that in its naturd state the water is obiectionable at certain seasons ok the year and that the 7uture may see H ,nore or less polluted. While filtration should "e^ovethfs olfaction almost entfrely, the l-^ent danger will never theless still exist, and conscientious care and attention must be exeSed to overcome it. No such danger exists in the artesian water. , . . ^„i„ It therefore appears t^^^the artesian supply is not on^7 cheaper, but also safer to use. than that obtained trom the Assini boine River. , , In view of the advantages of soft over hard water as stated in the in roduct on. the small expense per family v.ould surely not be resisted! and I shall assume that you will prefer the supply of softened water. UI. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, Aflpr the water, soft and clear at all times is deUvered into the city reservdr. i is then necessary to distribute it m such a manner as to furnish the citizens with the quantity they need and also with a fire pressure. It has already been said that for reasons of economy ^iro t,reJure should Cfurnished only when required. At other times Pressure shouM be mo.lerate Jnd reduced to a minimum during the fatter half of the night. (Appendix IV A.) The quantity of water consumed is greatest during the day and leastTuring the night. The pipe and pumping system must Xrefo e be p^-oportioned to supvly these varying quantities K Tt is ass^ume.!. that the maxUum consumption .s one and three nuarter times the average; or. for a mean -uppiv "f 2.400.000 gallons per day. it is taken at the rate of 4.200.000 gallons per day. mtrnm-mmntmimmmmmim mmmmtKam - .^i^^g^f^gmMJ^/grM^iii^^fimfigafui^tg^mtxi. Using small set- ho annual cost is 3 somewhat ex leri- its, I prefer, how- 3 for comparison. • project is accom- i natural state the year, and that the lie filtration should t danger will, ncver- attention must be sts in the artesian lupply is not only led from the Assini- rd water, as stated ily \. ould surely not prefer the supply of mes, is deUvered into istribute it in such a antity they need and ons of economy flro ired. At other times to a minimum during jatest during the day pumping system must e varying quantities, nsumption is one and iin 'supply of 2.400,000 )0,000 ga'llons per day. 35 A distribution reservoir is therefore required to receive the water from the softening plant at a uniform rate, to store it and to enable the pumps to draw the quantity that may be required at any moment. (Introductory.) The capacity of such a compensating reservoir is assumed at 1,000,000 gallons. While it is usual to make this capacity greater, so as. to allow of a temporary stoppage of the delivery works for repairs, it is thought that the greater expense is hardly warranted in your case, owing to the proposed method of collecting and soft- ening the water. A tank reservoir is sometimes used in order to allow the pumping to be suspended during the night, when the draft is least. But such a suspension is not advisable in your city, unless the tank were placed sufficiently high to furnish fire pressure. Such a height is impracticable. Pumping must be continuous, and the sole purpose of the reservoir is to compensate for the irregular draft. A stand pipe is sometimes used to equalize the varying pres- sures, and to relieve the pumps of sudden strains and shocks. Modern pumping machinery, however, does not necessarily require this safeguard, as protection can be provided in other ways. More- over a stand pipe would not be advisable in your climate for other reasons. The distribution resejrvoir should be built underground, and covered with masonry arches resting on piers. Its dimensions have been assumed at 106 feet square and the depth of water at 15 feet. The pumping station, at which the water is pumped from the reservoir into the mains, should be the same as that at which it is pumped from the wells to the basin of the softening plant. The economy of operating a combined station is apparent. It should be located beyond the Fair grounds and near McPhillips street. The pumps have been estimated in duplicate and are to lie of the best class, with triple expansion, so as to economize as much as possible in fuel. The pipe system starts with a twenty inch main, and conducts the water to the inhabited parts of the city. Colonel Ruttan has suggested a pipe distribution system for this purpose, which I have examined and can fully approve as being well adapted to give both the quantity and pressure required. I can also fully «ndoi*8e his a 1 vice to have no mains smallor than si.x inches in tfiameter, except in connecting two pipes from one ■MMMMMMMlli mi miiiiii - 36 Wock to another, for which purpose a four i^^Jj P'P« «*';;^J^ ^^^^^ if 1.0 lire hydrant is connected with it No tour-mch pipes, however, have been included in the estimate ot cost. Fire hydrants in your climate shouUl be of the post pattern, sothatthejcanbe readily seen when snow ««;;«'« fjf f^^^^ Thev should, if practicable, have a drip connection with a sewer or with a small pit provided for the purpose and filled with coarse ^"*''The lencth of pipes necessary for a population of 40,000 persons I ha?e estimated at 65 miles, while for a Pop« "^t'O" °J ?S"rOO JersU this length might have ^^^ be in-e^^^^^^^^^ ^«n^ As the buildincs are now somewhat scattered ana as iney Tould tS t suppUed^ith water, excepting those at the outskirts. I did not think it well to estimate a smaller mileage. The number of valves and hydrants are given at the minimum allowance raUs usually considered permissible for the above pipe ft was stated in the Introduction that the consumption per inhabiirt. particularly when the pressures wi I ^e '--^^ed^^^^^^^ not be kcDt as low as the rate assumed in this report. unt..ss tne water supplied to .nsumers is metered. I have theretore allowed for metering the entire supply. It should be added hero that the metres should be the piop- ^rtv of the City No control could otherwise be exercised over Uit^m. nof a guLnL offered that their registration was fairly Tl? TiT T: Sr/tTb^st thatlhe^e touM t"'! l^ntipaVltVol'of ^^UVloSd^n public property and TeauirL the temporary removal of parts of pavements But L^^thesei vice pipes are entirely in the interest and for the riefit of the fesFCtive consumers, it is proper that their cos should be borne by them and that these service pipes should be considerSi as a diJ^ect benefit to the property. ^hc.r cost is. therefore, not charged to municipal plant. , , , , , In establishing a waterworks plant provision should be made for a storehouse and repair shop, which arc necessary adjuncts to the distribution system. ,. . .^ .• * « r,.««^ An estimate of cost of the entire distribution «yft«'n. " Jjf of which will answer for a much larger population than 40,0 perrons is iiven Inflow. It has been the intention to make this Suate 1 b?ral, so as to fully cover all contingent expenses. U mmm h pipe can be used, 'Ho four-inch pipes, f cost. (f the post pattern, covers the ground, ction with a sewer id filled with coarse opulation of 40,000 for a population of ncreased only 40 per attered and as they hose at the outskirts, nileage. riven at the minimum )le for the above pipe the consumption per ill be increased, could lis report, unless the ave therefore allowed should be the prop- ise be exercised over gistration was fairly lins to the buildings ,t there should be u I public property and of pavements. But, interest and for the proper that their cost ervicc pipes should be perty. Their cost is, vmon should be made 1 necessary adjuncts to tribution system, most population than 40,000 intention to make this ontingent e.xpensos. U 37 is of course unnecessary to lay a greater length of pipe or to set more hydrants than may be required at any given time. Distribution Reservoir $45,000 Pumping Station : Land S 2,000 Preparing grounds 2,000 Buildings, foundations, chimneys, etc 15,000 Two hoiizontal, triple expansion, high duty pumps 76,000 Distribution Pipes : 4,800 M GOOO .. 12,.500 M 27,000 M 3(),.500 .. 54,000 I. 200,000 .. 18 10 14 12 10 •S 6 * 60 per ft. . 818,400 3 80 M . 18,240 y.20 M . 19,200 2.60 H . 32..500 2.10 .. . 56,700 1.70 M . . 62,050 1..W „ 70,200 0.90 .. . . 180,000 95,000 457,290 Valves : 3—20 inch valves, in position, at S230 S 690 486 472 1,339 1,584 2,079 3,2.50 18,981 3—18 4—16 13—14 18—12 27—10 50— 8 333— 6 II II II II II II 162 118 103 88 77 05 57 Hydrants : 3.50—8 inch hydrants, in position, at $130 $45,500 220—6 M .. .. <- 100 22,000 $28,881 Meters : 4950— § inch meters, set in place, at $12.20 $60,390 1230—1 .. .. .. 18.30 22,509 350—1 .. .1 .. 24.40 8,540 60— li .. H M 42.00 J,520 10-2 .. H M 68.40 684 67,500 $703,671 $94,643 #l1i^ it: 38 Storehouse and uiBcfcine repair shop ^^'^^" $808,314 Contingencies and engineering, 10 per cent. ^^'^^^ $889,145 The annual cost of the distribution system, as above estimated, will therefore be as follows : ao- -ap Interest on $889,145, at 4 per cem^ ^o'lZ Pumping 2,400,000 gallons per day ^^.JJJJ Maintenance and repairs ' $53,706 IV. UTILIZATION OF PARTS OF THE PRESENT SYSTEM. The foregoing investigation has been made on the ««PPOBit^|; that the franchise of the company now supplying the city w th water soon expires, and that every obligation on the part of the Citv towards the company then ceases. „ . , ^ In such a case, the City would be free thereafter to adopt whatever ource of supply, and to build whate^;er sptem of di«- TributLn it might deem best for its interests. The investigation for a new supply has therefore been made us though the present works were wholly private. The resu'tintr conclusions have indicated that another source than the present%ne would furnish better water and at a less exnense A question then arises: Cannot some P;rts of the Sent works\e embodied in the better system ? 1 so there is So ntcLli^y for duplicating them, and the City should buy them from the company at a fair valuation. As the pumping station of the proposed works would be in a different locality, oHly the pumping machinery and hlters might perhaps be utilized. . i • The pumps operated by the company neither appear to be m tirst-class^ondition, nor are they designed to do «« economical work as can bo done by a higher type of machinery. At the time ■MM 39 t. 10,000 $808,314 80,831 $889,145 , as above estimated, $35,o66 13,140 5,000 $53,706 [HE PRESENT de on the supposition plying the city with )n on the part of the e thereafter to adopt latever system of dis- ts. The investigation ivs though the present jd that another source • water and at a less it some p»rts of the ^stem ? if so, there is City iihould buy them d works would be in a nery and filters might neither appear to be in J to do as economical ichinery. At the time when the franchise expires, it is a question whether the present pumps would be worth moving and re-erecting to perform so important a duty as would be expected of them. I therefore do not advise their purchase and have estimated for new machinery. The filters are of a design which is not well adapted to the purpose of removing the crystaline precipitate caused by the soft- ening of the well water. Their operation would be at least troublesome and expensive, and I can not recommend them as a part of the new .system. On the other hand, the pi[ ^ can largely be utilized. I am informed that there are a few miles of old pipe, joined simply by contact and without load. If these pipas cannot withstand the increased fire pressure, they have of course little or no value in the distribution .system. The other pipes, namely, those having joints caulked with lead, and which constitute the major part of the system, are reported to be in good condition. These pipes could therefore be embodied in the new works, wherever they allow sufficient circulation and pressure. Where they do not allow of this, the smallest pipes could be discarded and replaced by larger ones to act as feeders. The value of the pipes of a distribution system, when they have been in the ground .for some years, is of course less than the value of new pipes, because their life is limited by being subject to gradual corrosion. The value of the hydrants and valves is also dependent upon their actual condition, and those which are suitable might be embodied in the new system. METHODS OF PROPORTIONING THE PAYMENTS FOR THE SYSTEM. The total annual cost of supplying t' e city with 2,400,000 gallons of water from Artesian wells, us estimated above, is as follows : Softened and delivered into reservoir $32,175 Distributed throughout city 53,706 $86,881 HMHIP' J- -#!B 40 At tMs plaee it U prop- '» «d^ » annual ^^l^ow^ee Jor^ ad- rS^^r ^T-S^^-^Wera^rfSi *^05,881, to cover which a revenue must be provided. , . „ . T^is revenue is assun.ed to be met by the following pay- ™^"*rTUpoUvatlaraepays for the water ':ised for public pur- posesl-su'Jh a"t: eXang. street sprinkling, fountains, sewer ""■"ty 'the use of meters or by estimate it is P-ticable t^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^"rs??SSS€SraSt^: ='rw^rw:ter!'anT,t*:rbe .0 charged in the toUowmg estimates^ ^^ ^^_^^^, charge per run- „i„,iot'„f"ne'»ren'°£S in £ro,Jt li their property, whether .t is improved and water is used or not. , ...it^t^rsf^'S^iSSSS assessment is $2.oU. Assurainj, ^ pc added water r;n fnnf lot should have been increased »oU by tne auaeu w«ti, 50 toot lot s'^o""*, ";,, ^ doubted that the real increase of value -iTbur^^gn 1.^^^ with^:--; Bini lar aU«^^"««' ,f"^. ^^'^ ^^^t the asses^^^e frontage is about sections, it is "«"f ^J ,^3^,^^ lathis was assumed at 65 miles. ZTTit Itr f t^^^^^^^ on both sides of the pipe.' at Last 4ot00O K^^^^ f-nt'^^^ ^^'^^^ ^' '^^^"'^^^^ ^'' '^" '^''^" 3 Consumers to pay for the quantity of water they use. There can be no question as to the propriety of paying in pro- valuable commodities. iMBI 4^ "" "'T l ' j . al allowance for ad- h I place arbitrarily iture of $105,881, to r the following pay- used for public pur- :lins, fountaiKS, sewer s practicable to deter- 1. As the water does purposes, it might be arae at the cost of the rged in the following innual charge per ruii- ir property, whether it ater main adjoins a lot, and the cause of such tor instance, the lot has ;s per foot, the annual interest, the value of a 50 by the added water le real increase of value bo charge corner lots for :tiou should be made on of the house line. This ible that a second house I feet. With this, or a )n for the street inter- issable frontage is about was assumed at 65 miles, both sides of the pipe,* at ail able for this charge, ity of water they use. opriety of paying in pro- good water supply, and it of water used. The in America and Europe )f measuring gas or other 41 Assuming that you will adopt this modern and just mode of charging consumers, a rate per 1,000 gallons should be fixed ; but as mentioned in the Intoductory, each consumer should be charged with a minimum price, irrespective of the quantity consumed, and pay the meter rates only for excessive quantities. You will best know what you would prefer to state as a minimum rate, or how to adjust it. For purposes of estimate I shall assume that it is placed at 30 gallons per head per day. This quantity of water is nearly equal to that used per inhabitant in London, England. It should therefore be sufficiently liberal. On the other hand, if we compare it with the cousumption per in- habitant in the United States, it cannot be considered too liberal, and therefore a hardship upon the poorer classes. The average private consumption per head will be much greater, and, so far as the income is concerned, I think it can safely be placed at 60 gal- lons per head. The works as estimated are to serve 40,000 persons. There- fore, the revenue should be based upoL> this number. This population, however, will not be served for a number of years after the works have been built. Therefore, an allowance should be made to cover the deficiency in the revenue. This purpose is served, I think, by proportioning the charge against consumers among 33,000 inhabitants, or, assuming 5 jpersons to the family, among 0,600 families or water takers. There is at present a smaller number within the territory to be furnished with water ; but there may be 8,000 families when the population taking water reaches 40,000 persons. From what has been said regarding the method of paying for the works and for the water to be furnished, it is seen that the income is to be deri 'ed from three sources, the City at large, the abutters and the consumers. The City at large is charged for water, because it does not need to be softened, at a smaller rate than the consumers, on whose account the entire supply must be softened. The following statement shows the probable income per annum : 1. City at large: 200,000 gallons per day at 12.5 cents per M ... . $ 9,125 2. Abutters: 400,000 feet frontage at 5 cents per foot 20,000 m 42 3. Consumers (average) : 33,000 persons at 60 gallons, or 1,980,000 gallons pel- day at 15 cents per M 108,o65 4. Lost, or not chargeable. 220,000 gallons 8137,680 Therefore, the annual charges would probably be $137,680. It is thus seen that the charges apparently exceed the cost by over 30 per cent. In an enterprise like this one. haying a few uncertain^ factors, it is a good business P^nciple to res jt «p^ safe basis. It is better to assume high rates, ^'^h a prol«ib.hty ot reducing them in the future, than to resort to t-e unpopular necessity of i'-creasing them. The rates can be practically reduced at any time by a "owing a discount -or prompt payment. The following statement shows- the resu"t when 20 per cerit is allowed the abutters and consumers for thts prou.ptness,^nd supposing that every one were to avail himself of the privilege : ^.^ . , $ 9,125 City at large ^^^^^ Abutters ■ ^.r. 041 Consumers (average) ______ $111,969 While this figure still exceeds the estimated cost, it js wise to keep it in exce.ss, "patticularly at the beginmng of the period when the water takers are comparatively few and the outlay is great In flct the privilege of a discount should depend upon the actud tacc, line P"J^' S , ., amount of the discount should be Tntuy flfed 4thTci';^(S»dl, in aecord»nce with the necea.- ities of the case. It was stated to me that many of the P°°'«\ *^";"'f "^ furnished with hard water by watermen at the rate of 2o cents n^ barrel which is furthef said to last them about a week. &s thev pay about $12 per annum. For the same money Sie city c^n furnish them with many times this quantity of clear and soft water throughout the year. Let us suppose that a family does not use more than 30 gallons per head or in all 150 gallons per day At this rate C woS d consume 5*,750 gallons per annum. They may choose toTake advantage of a 20% discount for prompt payment or not. ■M L. lions 108,555 S137,680 bly be $137,680. exceed the cost by one, having a few >le to rest it upon a ith a proUability ol: to t'^e unpopular ly time by allowing ig statement shows [iters and consumers J one were to avail ....% 9,125 16.000 86,844 $111,969 ,ed cost, it is wise to of the period, when the outlay is great, end upon the actual e discount should be ,nce with the necess- poorer families are the rate of 25 cents them about a week. • the same money ihis quantity of clear »t use more than 30 day. At this rate 1. They may choose (rapt payment or not, 43 provided the city can give this reduction. They may reside on a 25 foot, or on a 50 foot lot. The annual payments und these four conditions would be as follows : 50 foot lot,— No discount .' $10 71 Discount 8 57 25 foot lot,— No discount 9 46 Discount ^ 7 57 It is thus seen that the poorer classes would have but a moderate rate to pay, and get an ample supply of water therefor. I have assumed a constant meter rate, whether the consump- tion is lai-ge or small. Sometimes large consumers are given a lower rate. This practice, however, is not just to the small con- sumers, ajs the cost of furnishing the water is practically the same per gallon in one case as in the other. It should be added that the question of water supply must also be considered as to its influence on fire insurance rates. If a good lire pressure over the entire city can be furnished there will be a marked reduction in these rates, which will somewhat offset the water rates. In conclusion, it should be said that the cost of water per 1,000 gallons decreases as the consumption increases. Therefore, the above-mentioned rates, which have been based on a consump- tion of 2,400,000 gallons per day, while they may not allow of being discounted at first, they may allow of even a greater discount than the one given above, when the consumption becomes greater. For this reason it was not thought necessary at present to estimate the actual cost of supplying water for a population of 100,000 persons. It must also be stated that, as instructed, no allowance has been made for a sinking fund to pay off the debt which must be incurred for the works. As the machinery and other perishable parts thereof must in time be replaced, new appropriations will be therefore required. Thei8 have been several assumptions made in this report merely for the purpose of illustrating certain features or con- clusions. It is practicable for you to change those assumptions which do not pertain to strictly engineering questions if, in your 44 wisdom, othera would bettor accommodate the citizens. I t^u^t that I have stated such cases with sufficient clearness so that^^^ whatever change you might make, you can still follow my anniment to its legitimate conclusion. Respectfully presented, RUDOLPH HERINO. Attached to this report arc j Appendix I,— Canadian Pacific Well Test; II,— Chemical A.nalyse3 ; III,— Dr. Button's Report on Softcnirg Winnipeg Waters. " IV, — Assumed Data and Prices. Plate I, -Profiles of Artesian Wells; «. II,— Profile of Conduit to Poplar Springs; Profile of Conduit to Winnipeg River; « III, Plan showing Conduit Lines. ^-UJt mmmm mmm iizens. I trust that less, so that, with i still follow my ed, OLPH BERING. Test ; I Softcnirg !S. ) ir Springs; lipeg River; es. APPENDIX I. Test of Canadian Pacific Railway Well. Winnipeg, Ist April, 1897. From 18 o'clock, March 27th, until IS o'clock, March 2Sth, no water was pumped, and at the end of this time the water in large well had risen to within a few inches of the ground level. From 13 o'clock, March 29th, till 13 o'clock, March 30th, the large Dayton pump in the engine room was kept pumping contin- uous' y up to its greatest capacity, drawing water from the large well, and also from the old well between engine room and car shop. The level of the water was measured each hour and is given below. At the end of the 24 hours it had not gotten quite down to the suction valve, as the combined flow of the two wells was more than the pump could overcome. At 12:30, March 30th, the old we'd was shut off from the pump, and water pumped from the large well only, when the water rapidly sank in the large well, and was kept within a short distance above the suction valve for 24 hours, from I* o'clock, March 30th, till 15 o'clock, March 31st. Two tests were made to determine the slip of the pump, the strokes being counted for one hour while water was pumped into the tank and note taken of the volume of water pumped, the first test being made when the water was just covering the suction valve, and the second when there were about 12 feet of water over the suction valve. These gave 1.88 and 1.78 Imperial gallons respectively for each stroke of the pump, or an average of 1.83 Imperial gallon.s. The diameter of pump barrel is 7|", stroke H", i w i wwiiMliiwy ' emttt^Ji'* i. .wS^^ .-;-([»*■ 46 n,irin(T the 24 hours from 13 o'clock, M«rch 29th, to 13 Durincr the 24 hours from 14 o'clock March 30th, to 1* J^idck Mar^Tsist, the pump made 82,740 strokes, or an average of 57.46 Plr^kes pcr'minu^te. ^At 1.83 gallons f J ^^'^^^ ^'neTmLte 151.414 gallons per 24 hours, or about lOo gallons per mmute The average pressure of water in the discharge FPe jj th« pump was, during the first 2t I'ours' test about 50 PO»^d Per square inch, and during the second 24 hourS.aboutJO pounds per square inch. The pump could not be run so ^^f <>/"""» the^^sT^^^^ 24 hours, as during the first, as the Ap.'^ »« ^ater into the well was not sufficient to keep the pu-p supplied at that pace. Attached are tables showing the level of the water m well and the speed of pump at various times during the test. A. C. Frith, Assistant Can. Pac. Ry. Co. MM mtm 47 dwrch 29th, to 13 okes, or an average r stroke this would gallons per minute. 30th, to U o'clock an average of 57.46 this would come to jns per minute, scharge pipe of the jout 50 pounds per bout 30 pounds per jt during the second er into the well was it pace. ,f the water in well the test. it Can. Pac. Ry. Co. Distances of Water Below Platform in Well, (Platform is 13.1 feet below the ground level.) Water Water Dute. Time. Level, Feet. Date. Time. Level, Feet. 1897. 1897. March 29 13.15 2.25 March 30 13.35 11.92 M 14.15 4.25 11 14.10 1108 M 15.15 645 II 15.15 11.55 II 1G.15 7.84 II 16.15 1190 II 17.1i^ 8.G8 II 17.15 11.10 II < 18.15 8.76 II 21.00 8.51 „ 1£.15 8 60 M 22.00 8.66 II 20.15 S.90 II 23.00 9.69 II 21.15 8.79 ;i 24.00 10.47 II 22.15 9.33 March 31 1.00 10.76 II 23.15 9.60 II 2.00 10.84 March 30 24.15 8.89 II 3.0'.) 10.86 II 1.15 9.60 II 4.00 11.02 11 2.15 10.00 II 5.00 11.04 II 3.15 10.66 II 6.00 10.61 II 4.15 11.00 II 7.00 10.60 11 5.15 11.16 II 8.00 11.05 II G.15 11.30 It 9.00 11.60 II 7.15 10.68 II 10.00 11.70 II 8.15 9.62 II 11.00 11.72 II 9.55 9.00 II 11.45 11.50 II 10.45 8.80 II 13.00 11.46 II 11.45 9.06 II 13.50 11.05 II 12.50 9.45 11 14.55 9.85 II 1315 11.30 Noi'K.— At tl.OS feot below platform the Huotlon valvo beKins to draw nlr. 48 1r!l ' Number of Strokes made by Pump. Date. 1897 March 29, n M •I M I I) It March 30, It M II II Time. 13.00 13.49 14.37 15.00 16.09 16.55 17.40 18.30 20 . 58 22.15 7.19 7.33 8.00 8.. '2 9 35 10.25 11.37 13 00 1?.40 No of Strokes. 2000 4000 5000 8000 10000 12000 14000 ♦20000 23100 48500 49000 5000(» 52000 54000 55500 58350 G2100 G2950 DlitC. 1897 March 30, March 31, II II II II No. of Strokes. 2240 6000 7700 11840 12000 29100 30000 31000 32000 34300 35000 36200 37800 40000 41370 42000 42600 pump Hlr^ken not counted between .i.:40 «m, U VHocU on March mh. iiiTnitMl ■■■■■■■■■■nMii Pump. 2240 6000 7700 11840 12000 29100 30000 31000 32000 34300 35000 36200 37800 40000 41370 42000 42000 cm oiU on March ilOth. ^ e> St « (5 5? • 5! 9 f» & Vi ^ i ee t» 0) o .to 111 «8 5-3 1 .-^ g Sd 2 a e 00 d i « * £ CS u -IS P ■V ". S2 Edd S !2 O 13 O 1(5 a o Id !$ d i us T s s .sp.s - 8 ^11 --'Sf ^ JS u TS . B c - w y >' S o « g-o S t, > -3 5 - § S 8 •? 2 » >> B o * V ii 1 § i^ n u) l« . •V V 73 B ^. C S ■" 5 mS ■ -.5 B .S V xhib flow mat M U i g 1 1 (!^ ^ -<1 3 "" Efc^ « m 5i U5 — c 5 i5 _S5. ^ S 3 5 t~> S Si S ^ S o o 58 6o « >» J^ § a w V ii c4 ^ » » ha W 8^ Zji oS • w *-* o .^% .^S aa cc •k U) « •o £ a § a S < < T'51 xS a < t/t U3 S o £ Q 9' >, _?* Ill .. . a.t b '•"2 u ^ > c ST a S •! u 5 n^~.S C « o 8 5 Ja- a o » Ji bi iS-oS ° " u 2 " 8 S.§ss ~ B "13.3 S e a -o'S, « 41 " S "I— » 3 o a. o a a a •5 4; o K 1 i I M w c 1 1 & & & u •c c u a S'i Q . 1! us „- 3 ^r. -y-. < 2 52 APPENDIX III. Abstract of a Report by Dr. Huttoii on the Softening of Winnipeg Waters, To render the water from the Artesian wells of Winnipeg satisfactory for domestic pvrposes, treatment with a mixture of milk of lime and a solution of carbonate of sodmm would, in my opinion, be the best and most available process. The quantities of materials required are as follows : Lime. 300 to 350 lbs. per 100,000 gallons. Sodium carbonate, 40 to 50 lbs. per 100,000 gallons. A very simple test, whereby it may be known when the proper quantity of lime has been added, is as follows : A few drops of a 5 per cent solution of nitrate of silver added to the treated water causes the formation of a faint yellow pre- cipitate. The color of this precipitate is white when insufficient lime has been used, but is brownish when too much lime has been added. . .x a- * i- To make the treatment sucessful thorough agitation of tne water after adding the softening materials is essential. 1 he lime and the soda should be prepared separately, but may be added to the water at the same time. A small quantity of alum would hasten the settling, but is not absolutely necessary, because of the absence of organic matter. The Poplar.Spring water could be sufficiently softened by the addition of milk of I'me alone, and would require about 260 to 800 lbs. of lime per lOU.OOO gallons. There is very little differ- ence in total hardness between this spring and the present water The follo'-ing observations on the rate of clarification with lime alone have been made : Ross Ave Well— One-third of a 30-inch tube was com- paratively clear in four minutes; the whole of the tube was com- paratively clear in 25 minutes, and had completely settled m lo m» Sohening of s of Winnipeg b a mixture ol n would, in my )ws: lium carbonate, )wn when the 'S : of silver added unt yellow pre- hen insufficient 1 lime has been agitation of the itial. The lime nay be added to of alum would r, because of the ly softened by quire about 250 ^ery little differ- te present water ilurification with tube was com- e tube was com- ely settled in 15 S3 hours. An addition of 0.025 parts of alum per 1000 paiis of water caused settlement in 4* hours. Poplar SPRiNG.-One-third of the tube was comparative y clear in four minutes; the whole of the tul^ was cj^P-f-^y clear in 40 minutes, and had completely settled in 18 hours. An addition of 0.025 parts of alum per 1000 parts of water caused settlement in five hours. , ^ ^ , x After softening, the water is bright and clear and tasteless at room temperature. *" When lime alone is "^ed ^he^"^/ «^*^f '^ ;?.niminuti .1 of calcium and magnesium carbonates by about 60 per ceT Thirty pounds of lime fdded to 10.000 gallons of water would give a deposit of 61^ lbs. of calcium carbonate. When sodium carbonate is added as well as lime it reacts on the sulphates of calcium and magnesium, changing them into the ess so uWe carbonates, and leaves in solution an equivalent quan- tity of "odium sulphate which 1^ very soluble, harmless and non- soap-destroying. ., . j c The addition of the soda further decreases the hardness of the water from 10 to 20 per cent. The rate of settling of the precipitates would be more rapid in shallow than in deep tanks, and much more rapid in tanks than in the glass tubes used for experiments. (Signed) W. A. B. HUTTON. Winnipeg, July 17th, 1897. APPENDIX IV, A^Data assumed for purposes of comparison and for estimating cost of works. Ij„.edi.te p.rovUi.io„ i^TZ. JOOOO person. Future provision tor iw.vw ,/« Water prehsures : ^ . , • Fire pressure. 75 lbs. per square inch at hydvants in business centre, and 10 adjoining fire streams, each 35 cubic feet per minute. Ordinary domestic pressure, 30-40 lbs. per square inch. Minimum night pressure, 20-25 lbs. per square inch. -_safis u Consumption per head per day : Imperial Gallons. Cubic Peet. (Approx.) Average rate, 60 9.6 Maximum rate, 105 16.8 Immediate total provision per day: Averaj3;e rate, 2,400,000 384,000 Maximum rate, 4,200,000 672.000 Future total provision per day : Average . te, 6.000,000 960,000 Maximum rate, 10,500,000 l,od0,000 APPENDIX IV, B, — ^Prices assumed for labor, material, land, etc, in estimate ing cost of the works, in consultation with Col, H. N. Ruttan. Excavation, Etc. : Earth, in trencho-s S Earth, with boulders, part of conduit line. . 1 Muskegs Rock, limestone in trench 2 Rock, granite in trench . , 3 Excavation for reservoirs, etc. Removal pf surplus earth Sodding over Distribution Reservoir Ma:;10>IHY, Etc. : Brick laid in Portland cement 20 Brick laid in Portland cement (700 brick per cubic yard) 14 Concrete, piers, B.rches, bottom and walls of reservoir 8 00 to 10 Stone masonry 16 00 to 20 Cement (400 lbs. put bbl, delivered in city) 4 Sand, in quantity 1 30 per cu. yd 00 (( ( 60 (I 1 60 it f 50 (I < 25 t( t 25 llllll»Wi Cubic Feet. (Approx.) 9.6 16.8 384,000 672,000 960,000 l.odO.OOO tc„ in estimate ion with Col. 30 per cu. yd. 1 00 " 60 " 2 60 " 3 50 " 26 " 25 " 15 per sq. yd. 00 per M. 4 00 per cu. yd. 00 t. " 00 (( V^^ ^^^ Alum 2 cents .• Lime i cent .. Lime 15 cents per bushel of 60 to 70 lbs. Land, Etc. : Near present pumping station $1,000.00 per acre. McPhillips street 300.00 Strip of land for artesian wells 250.00 Conduit line to Poplar Springs 20.00 Conduik lino to Winnipeg River 5.00 At Popiar S;irings *0.00 Pumping station site at Winnipeg River. . 1,000.00 Wages, Salaries, Etc. Common labor 16c. to l1\c. per hour. Skilled labor 25 Bricklayers 50 m Carpenters (ordinary) 26 u Masons 50 u Salaried Men : Foremen SJIOO.OO per month. Common laborers 40.00 « Engineer at Pumping Station 120.00 n Asst. II II .11 75.00 II Firemen n "• 6000 h I ■■■■I JMiBBiigWaB ;~* -,T^iVi^S»fc..rf««*-*M , . 1 cent per lb. . 2 cents » . \ cent M of 60 to 70 lbs. 300.00 per acre. 300.00 250.00 20.00 5.00 40.00 )00.00 17^. per hour. 25 50 M 25 M 50 i< 0.00 per month. [).00 O.OO .1 5.00 t. 000 M Approximate Section near Nona and Powers Sfs. Approximate Section on line of Can Pac Rwy. PlaleJ To aeeomjxmjf-Rep^ (^ Rudd^Herin^. IS3T. nv^K^n^ ■SMI ' ^ ItlUM-laHMI HMMH •''f^.^^f^f^t. ..jj^ufca^kw*^--^ I TKsmm^mwfSimfswifmssm^'^mi'f'^yi^'m.-v'i^mjy- ■>*« ■^I'a^SSK^i^i^fflESEJK'^ PlcOeM Plan shDwing CoruMt lines w Poplar Springs and Winnipeg Bii/er. to acwmpany Report of Rtidjolptv Herlng, 1897. l5Mt SCALE.