LOVELL'S SERIES OF SCHOOL BOOKS. LOVELL'S HISTORY OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA, AND OTHEE PAKTS OP BRITISH AMERICA. ILLUSTRATED BV NUMEROUS ENQRA VINOS. ' „ ••■ - " .> : • * J ' ^' ■. . * u r .. . t S ' • • » J! ". " ^ » ' -.. " ■' » .. . • I • Reviked Edition flo.m: N'oV Places. . " Hietorv maketh a youuR man to bo old, without either wrinkles or gny hoin, privileging him with the experience of age without its infirmities." FULLEB. [ontreal : LOVELL PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY. FOR SALE AT THE BOOKSTORES. 1876. /2./V Entered, according to Act of Parliament of Canada, in the year one thousand eight hundred and eeventy-aix, BY LOVELL PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY. In the office of the Minigter of Agriculture and Statistics at Ottawa. —7-% r-i ; r-T- ■9 * . • » ^* • • • ft ft ft ft 4««ft ft « » % € . t . ' .« • • ■■■,'' • • « V i • * • • t \ .■ I < • < • . J •. ^ <, ) rv^>i LOVELL'S HISTORY OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA, AND OTHER PARTS OF BRITISH AMERICA. PRELIMINARY. Rightly to understand the past and present history of the Province of British North America, we should, did our space permit, inckide in it a brief reference to the earlier annals of those European nations whose discoveries and enterprise form the background of our own historical times. We should be glad to take a rapid glance at the history of those two great nations which first brought the civilization of Europe to these shores. We should know ^mething of the ancient Britons when they were first isited by the ubiquitous Roman ; and when, from a rude and helpless infancy, they struggled and rose to a more than tribal manhood, even in those days of brief and law- less chieftainship. We should study their after-history, when invasion, disaster, and defeat, like the flames of a fiery furnace, had gradually fused their fitful nationality into that of their successive invaders. Such a study would lead us to feel proud of that race, when, in after-times, the commercial tastes and regal instincts, which led them to plant colonies and establish good government, had slowly 4 PRELIMINARY. developed the institutions and moulded the national char- acter of the people of that freedom-loviiig land which we rejoice to call our Mother Country. Nor should we, did space permit, omit to take an equally rapid glance at the contemporaneous history of that other great and chivalrous people who first discovered and colonized Canada ; — a people who, by many national souvenirs, have left upon the broad and noble features of the whole of the North American continent the deep im- press of their undaunted courage and active enterprise in exploration and discovery. After these rapid surveys should be prepared to follow , the main subject of the book, — a comprehensive summary of Franco-British American history during the last three hundred years. We should as a people, in a devout and thankful spirit, "remember all the way which the Lord hath led [us] in the wilderness," since we were planted here as a cluster of colonies ; how He has preserved to us, and, after much agitation and strife, has even augmented to us the enjoy- ment of those blessings of civil and religious freedom for which our fathers contended, and for which, as a nation, the empire of our Queen is so pre-eminently distinguished. Under His providential guidance and protection we have reached a period of great political prosperity and social peace, so that the united British Colonies in America may be considered at this day as among the freest and most contented communities in the world. Part I. Era of Voyages—and Discoveries. CHAPTER I: Voyages and Discoveriks of Christopher Colum- bus. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Early Discoveries — Career of Columbus, 1. Christopher Columbus. — About the yeiir 1441, Chris- topher Columbus, the discoverer of America, was born in Gen-o-a, a seaport in Northern Italy. In Lisbon, whither he went, he devoted his time to the making of maps and globes, and thus greatly contributed to the in- formation and success of the Portuguese navigators. He WD Christopher Columbus. framed rules for the calculation of the latitude and longitude by sailors, when at sea, out of sight of land. He also sailed on voyages down the coast of Africa, and became familiar with the sea to the west- ward. 2. The Progress of Geograph- ical Knowledge up to this time was slow ; but not long after it reached a point which excited great curiosity in the minds of all scholarly and intelligent men. From Marco Polo's statements, it was known that an ocean lay to the east of Asia. The reputed discoveries of countries which had been made by the Northmen, far to the west- ward, by way of Iceland, together with the statements Questions.— What notable birth occurred in 1441 ? Give a sketch of the early career of Christopher Columbus. Trace the progress in geo- graphical knowledge in Europe up to the time of Columbus. 6 VOYAGES A.ND DISCOVERIES. [PART. I--14G2. of one of these Northmen (that he had been taken as a prisoner to the south amongst civilized people), fully im- pressed the navigators of the period with the belief that these countries were situated in or near Asia. This belief was based upon the descriptions of Southern Asia by Ptolemy (conlirnied as they were by the statements of Marco Polo), that Asia extended far eastward into the ocean. On globes constructed at this time, " Cipango" (Japan) is placed within 70 degieijs of the Az-ores, and " India extra Gangem " within i)0 ; whereas they are more than double that nund)cr of degrees distant from these islands. It was easy to imagine, therefore, that a navigator, with a little bravery and perseverance, would soon traverse the short distances thus laid down on the map. 3. Early Efforts of Columhui. It was under a belief of these suppositions, that Columb. IS first applied to the King of Portugal for means to prosecute bis voyage of discovery to India. Having failed to induce either that king, or Henry VII. of England, to enter into his project, he sought the aid of the court of Spain. After seven years of disappointment, he at length succeeded in inducing Isabella, the noble-minded Queen of Spain, to devote a portion of her Castilian j)atrimony to the encouragement of his scheme of discoverv. 4. Religions Ohjects of the Ex- pedition. — So strongly impressed was Columbus with the Christian objects of his mission, that he pro- posed to consecrate the treasure which he hoped to obtain from it to the pious purpose of rescu- ing the Holy Sepulchre at Jeru- Queen Isabella of Spain. Questions.— Where was Southern Asia supposed to be? Give the ancient name of Japan. What was the object of the early efforts of Col- umbus ? Describe the religious views of Columbus. Chap. 1-1492. VOYAGES AND DISCOVERIES. 7 salem from the liundH of the infidel Saracens. His more immediate design in undertaking this voyage to ^gia — or India, uh it was tlien called — was to convert the Great Khan of Tartary and his Hubjects to Christianity ; and for this puri)Ose Columbus actually took out letters with him to that monarch. 5. Voyaye of Columbus.— Tha port of Palos [pa-loce] in Spain was selected as the phu;e of embarkation. For some misdemeanor, tliis port was re(piired to furnish the king with two small vessels for a year. After reiieated delays and discouragements, a little fleet of three vessels was, by the aid of the brothers Pinzon,— two courageous navigators, — got ready for sea ; and on the 3rd of August, 1402, Columbus set sail on his memorable voyage. On leaving the harbor lie steered directly for the Canary Islands, where he arrived on the 0th. Here he remained until the Oth of September, making repairs. On the 0th of that month ho passed Ferro, (the last of the Canary Isles,) and with a feeling of sadness and awe, struck out into the un- known Atlantic. For several days the ships glided rapidly onward in their course and, with the aid of the steady trade- winds, quickly in- creased their dis- tance from Europe. Apprehension and alarm arose on every side at the unvarying course of the wind, — at the increasing length of the voyage, — at the variation of the needle of the compass, and at other occurrences, which The Fleet of Columbus. Questions.— Where did Oolnmbns embark? Why was this port Belecte(>"• Under the patronage of the (Jourt of Spain, he made a voyage, in 1525, as far south as the Brazils. Having entered the River La Plata, he erected a fort at St. Salvaa89. He published a volume before his death, containing an accc-int of his voyages and discoveries. He died in 1557, aged 80. Questions.— What led to the expeditions of the Cabots ? Describe the course of their voyage. Mention the places which Sebastian Cabot dis- covered. Sketch his life. 12 VOYAGES AND pTSCOVERtES. ft^ART t-l6d4. he named Ba-ca-le-os, — the native, as well as the Breton, or Basque [bask], name for codfish, which abounds on the coast. From this circumstance it is supposed that the Breton fishermen had frequented these shores before they were visited by Sebastian Cabot. 2. GortereaVs Voyages. — In 1500, Gaspard Cor-te-re-al, a Portuguese,* made a voyage to Lab-ra-dor, Newfound- land, and New England. Slavery being an important traffic with the Portuguese, Cortereal captured fifty In- dians, whom he sold as slaves on his return to Europe. He made a second voyage in 1501, and having reached Hudson Strait, was never afterwards heard of. His brother Michael is also supposed to have perished in 1502, while endeavoring to seek out and rescue him. 3. Verazzani's Voyage. -f — About this time the value of the cod-fisheries attracted the notice of the French. In 1506, Denys, of Honfleur, explored the Gulf of St. Lawrence; and in 1508, Aubert of Dieppe [de-epp], did the same. The French fishermen also frequented the Banks of Newfoundland. In 1518, the Baron de Lery attempted to settle Sable Island, and left some cattle there. In 1524, John Ver-az-za-ni, a Floren- John Verazzaiu. ^j^^ navigator, in command of four French vessels, made a voyage to America. He made * Gaspard Cortereal, a PortugueBe, was despatched from Lisbon by the king of Portugal, in 1500. He discovered Labrador and Greenland. (His father is said to have discovered Newfoundland in 1463.) He again left Lisbon for the New World in 1501, but was never heard of afterwards. t John Verazzani was a Florentine navigator in the service of France. In 1524. he took possession of the coast from Carolina to Nova Scotia, and called It New France. Having given spirituous liquors to the natives at one place, they called it Man-na-ha-tau, or place of drunkenness,— after- wards contracted to Man-hat-tan Island, now the site of the city of New York. He is said to have made another voyage in 1525, but it is not known. QiTESTioNS.— What was peculiar about the name which Cabot gave to Nevrfoundland ? Mention the chief incidents of Cortereal's voyages. How did he treat the Indians ? Give a sketch of the lives of Cortereal and Ye azzaui. -Describe Verazzanl's voyage. Chap. 11-1634.] VOYAGES AND DISCOVERIES. 18 a second voyage, under the patronage of Francis I., in 1525, and explored more than 2000 miles of coast, from 34° down to 50°. He returned to France during that year. In consequence of these discoveries the French king claimed possession of all places visited by Verazzani, He is said to have made a third voyage in the same year, but what became of him was never known. 4. Cartier's Discovery of Canada. — The supposed ill fate of Verazzani deterred the French for several years from any further at- tempt to explore the New World. In 1534, — nine years afterwards, — how- ever, Philip Chabot [shah-bo], admi- ral of France, urged the king, Fran- cis I., not to let Spain excel him in en- terprise, but to establish a colony in the New World. He recommended that Jacques Cartier, fzhak-car-te-ayl, a noted navigator of St. Ma-lo, should ^^^^^^'^ ^^'^*"'- command an expedition of discovery to the New World.* The Emperor Charles V. of Spain, and Joan III. of Por- tugal, having already sought to establish colonies there, protested against the projected expeditian of Francis I., who sarcastically replied, " I should like to see the clause in our Father Adam's will and testament which bequeaths * Jacques Cartier,the discoverer of Canada,wa8 born at St.Malo,France, in 1500. He was despatched to the west by Francis I. in 1534. On the 20th April, he sailed from St. Malo, reached Newfoundland on the 10th May, the Bay des Chaleurs [sha-loor] on the 9th July, the coast of Gaspe [gas-pay] on the 24th, and returned to France in August. He made his second voyage in 1535. On the festival of St. Laurent, in August, he reached a bay of the §ulf and river which, in honor of the dav, he called the St. Lawrence. In eptember he reached Stad-a-co-na, tLe present site of Quebec, where Don-na-co-na, an Algonquin [al-gong-kangg] chief, welcomed him. In October he visited Hochelaga, [ho-she-lah-ga], an Indian village near the site of Montreal, where a chief of the Huron Indians welcomed him. He very soon afterwards returned to France, forcibly taking with him the chief , Donnacona. In 1541, as second in command to M. de Ro-ber- val, he again visited Canada ; but having met with many disasters, he re- turned to France, and died soon after. Questions.— What led to the despatch of another expedition from France to America ? Why was it opposed ? When and from what place did Cartier sail from Eurone ? Sketch his life. What did Franeisl. say in reply to Joam and Charles ? 14 ' VOYAGES AND DISCOVERIES. [Pajrt I -1536. to my royal brothers alone so vast a heritage." At length, on the 20th of April, 1534, Cartier left St. Malo, a port on the coast of Britanny, with two ships. Twenty days after, he reached a cape on the Newfoundland coast, which he named Bona Vista. He turned southwards for a short distance, and then north- wards to the Strait of Belle Isle [bel-eel]. Passing through this strait, he turned southwards until he reached a coast, now known as that of New Brunswick. Here, on the 9th of July, he entered a Bay, which, in proceeding up, he and his companions experienced such in- tense heat that he called it the Cartier's Ship. " Bdie des Chaleurs." Passing northwards out of this bay, he rounded the peninsula, and, on the 24th of July, landed on the coast since known as *' Gasp^," — an Indian name for Land's end. There he erected a cross thirty feet high, on which he placed a shield bearing the fleur-de-lys [flur- de-lee] and an inscription, as emblematical of the new sov- ereignty of France in America. Thus was accomplished a most memorable event ; and thus was Canada silently and unconsciously incorporated into a mighty empire ; and thus too was completed that threefold act of discovery in America — the West Indies, by Spain ; Newfoundland, by England ; and Canada, by France, — which, as a natural consequence, pla^^^d side by side on a vast unknown con- tinent, the symbols of the sovereignty of three of the greatest nations of Europe. 5. Xjartier^s Further Discoveries. — Cartier did not long remain on the Gaspe coast; but having made a little further exploration, he turned his face homewards, taking with him two natives. These Indians having told him of Questions.— Describe the course of Cartier's voyage. At what places in New Brunswick and Canada did he land? How did he assert th« Bovereignty of France ? What is said of other nations ? Chap. II— 1536.1 VOYAGES AND DISCOVERIES. 15 the existence of a great river, which they called Hoche- laga, leading up so far into the country, that " no man had (so far as they knew) ever yet traced it to its source," Cartier felt most anxious to explore it, and the coun- tries through which it flowed. On his return to France, the news of his discovery, and the account given bv the two Indians of the great river yet unexplored, were received with so much interest, that on the 19th May, 1535, Cartier again left St. Malo in command of three ships. After a tempestuous voyage, he Jirrived at Newfoundland on the 7th of July. Here he waited for two of his ships, which had been separated from him ; and on the 7th of August he proceeded to explore the Gulf which he had visited the year before. On the 10th, he anchored in a bay at the mouth of a river, now called St. John. To this bay he gave the name of St. Law- rence, — having entered it on the festival of that saint. The name thus given to the little bay has since been applied to the great gulf and noble river which Cartier was the first European to discover and explore. On the 15th, he reached a large island, to which he gave the name of L'Assomption [las-son^-se-on]. The Indian name of this island, Na-tis-co-tee, has since been changed to An-ti-cos-ti. On the 1st of September, Cartier reached the mouth of a deep and gloomy river, called the Sague- nay [sagg-e-nee], known by the Indian name of the Chi- coutimi, or deep river. > 6. Cartier and Donnacona, — Having passed an island, which, from the abundance of hazel-nuts found on it, he called Isle aux Coudres, Cartier, on the 7th of September, came to a large and fertile island, which was covered with wild grapes. To this island he gave the name of Bacchus ; but it is now known as the Isle of Orleans. Here he sent his two Gaspe Indians ashore to make inquiries, and to propitiate the natives in favor of the QriESTioxs.— What did Cartier further do ? Did the news of Cartier's discoveries lead to anytliing ? Describe the course of his second voyage. How did the name St. Lawrence originate ? What other names did Car- tier give? . 16 VOYAGES AND DISCOVERIES. [PartI-IMI. new-comers. Next day he was received with friendly courtesy by the Algonquin [al-gon*-kan«] chief, Don-na- co-na. Proceeding a short distance up the stream, he moored his vessels for the winter in a basin where the river St. Charles (which he named St. Croix) [khrwha] mingles its waters with the St. Lawrence. Tn the angle formed by the confluence of these two rivers stood the Indian village of Stad-a-co-^a, to which Cartier was welcomed by his new friend, tli Algonquin chief. Car- tier was much struck with the beauty of the surrounding scenery, and with the appearance of the bold cape or headland which rose almost perpendicularly along the left, or northern, bank of the noble river, to which, at its narrowest part, the Indians had given a name since memorable as that of Kepec, or Quebec, which, in the Indian tongue, signifies a " strait." 7. Cartier at Hochelaga. — Cartier did not long remain at Stadacona. Having heard of a larger village, or k"^- na-ta,* — a native encampment, — up the river, he left two of his vessels behind, and, on the 2nd of October, reached Ho-che-la-ga, situated on a lp,rge and fertile island, near' the site of the present city of Montreal. Here he was well received by upwards of 1,000 Huron Indians, and treated with much kindness. The feeble old ag-o-han-nay or chief of the Hurons, regarded him as a superior being, who was able to renew his youth, and to heal the sick. Many of the sick were brought to him to be cured, over whom he read a portion of St. John's Gospel and prayed, making at the same time the sign of the cross. He found the encampment, or village, well planned and admirably * The Algonquin Indians at Stadacona (Quebec) having thus intimated to Cartier that Kan-na-ta, a collection of wigwams, or native Huron village was farther up the river, he probably understood them to apply that word to the whole country lying beyond him. Hence, in this way, it is likely that the name Kannata, or Cfanada, was given to the entire country which Cartier was then engaged in exploring. Questions.— Describe Cartier's visit to Donnacona and his village. Explain the Indian name of Quebec. What is said of the supposed derii YAtipu of the name of Canada ? Describe Cartier's visit to Hochelaga, Chap. 11-1541] VOTAaES AND DISCOVERIES. 17 defended. Near the village stood a lofty hill, — to which he gave the name of Mount Royal ; and from the top of which a panorama of great beauty and extent spread out before him. 8. Return to France. — Cartier did not long remain at Hochelaga, but returned to Quebec early in October. Fearing hostilities, he made a strong enclosure near his ships, and placed cannon in position to defend it. During the following winter his men suffered much from scurvy and cold ; he was therefore anxious to return to France. On the 3rd of May he erected a cross, with the arms of France upon it, in token of having taken possession of the country on behalf of his sovereign. He then sud- denly seized Donnacona and four other Indians, and on the 6th of May proceeded down the river, but did not reach St. Mulo until the 8th July, 1536. These Indians with their chief never returned to Canada, as they died soon after reaching France. efore he died, Donnacona and the other Indians were ]* iptized with great ceremony in the cathedral of Rouen [roo-on^]. 9. Expedition of Roberiml. — Owing to religious dissen- sions in France, and to a war with Spain, five years elapsed after Cartier's return, before another expedition was projected. To the command of this expedition, the king appointed Jean Francois de la Roque [roke], Lord of Rob-er-val in Pic-ar-dy.* Cartier was named second in command. M. de Rob-er-val also received a commission as viceroy of the new colony. A delay having occurred, Cartier was, in May, 1541, despatched in advance. Rob- erval followed him, in April of the next year. In the meantime, Cartier reached the scene of his first visit ; * Jean Francois de la Roque, Sieur de Roberval, a native of Picardy, France, was appointed Viceroy of Canada in 1540, and sailed thence, from Rochelle, in 1542. He met Cartier (returning to France) at St. John's, Newfoundland, in June. Having wintered at Cape Rouge, above Quebec, he, in June, 1543, explored the River Saguenay. Questions — Describe his act of treachery to the Indiang. What stepi were taken in sending out Roberval's expedition ? Give a ekatch of Rob- erval's life. 2 18 VOYAGES AND DISCOVERIES. [PART I— IMl but fearing the hostility of the Indians, on account of his treachery to Donnacona, he removed a little farther up the river, to Capt Rouge. Here a little settlement was made (protected by two forts) which was named Charlesl)ourg Royal. Leaving Vicomte de Beaupre [bo- pray] in command, Cartier sailed up to Hochelaga and tried to pass the Sault St. Louis (now called the Lachine Rapids) ; but being unsuccessful, he returned to Capo Rouge for the winter. In the spring he was treated with such hostility by the Indians that he set out at once for France. At Newfoundland he was met by Roberval, the viceroy, who commanded him to return to Canada. To avoid doing so, he weighed anchor in the night and sailed for France. He died there soon after. For his eminent services he was ennobled by the king ; and license to trade in Canada was granted to his heirs for twelve years after his death. Roberval continued his voyage to the place where Cartier had wintered, at Cape Rouge. Here he remained, and in the spring proceeded to explore the Saguenay River. After suffering various hardships, he returned to France in 1543. For six years afterwards, no effort was made to colonize Canada. 10. Other futile expeditions — Feudal System introduced. — During the next fifty years little was accomplished. Colonies in Brazil and Florida were projected ; but after a trial they failed, and were abandoned. In 1598, the Marquis de la Roche [rosh] was constituted the first lieutenant-general of the king, and was invested by him with power " to grant leases of lands in New France, in form of fiefs, to men of gentle blood." This was the origin of the feudal system which was afterwards intro- duced into Canada. It was subsequently modified by Cardinal Richelieu into a seigniorial tenure, which was not finally abolished until 1854. The Marquis sailed for Nova Scotia, but only reached Sable Island, where he Questions.— Trace Cartier's further career- How did the Roberval expedition end ? What other eteps were taken to promote colonization in France and what was the result ? ,. « Chap. II— 1M9,] SKETCH OF B. N. AMERICA. 19 landed forty French convicts, until he could select the site of a settlement. This a ntorin prevented him from doing ; and after touching on the count of Nova Scotia, he returned to France, leavii'g the convicts to their fate. In 1605 the king sent Che<'otel, u Norman })ilot, to them with relief, Imt only twelve were found alive. TIichc were brought back to France, and pardoned by king Henri IV., on account of their sufferings. Tlie marquis, having lost all his fortune, died unhappily soon after. Part II. Summary Sketch of the History of Canada. CHAPTER III. First Settlement of Canada, 1603-1608. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Causes leading to the settlement of New France, 1. Commercial Efforts. — Not only did French fisher- jnen continue to frequent the coast of Newfoundland, but under the patronage of Henri IV., Dupont Grave [due- pon*-gra-vay], a merchant of St. Malo, and Chauvin [shaw- van*'], a master-mariner of Rouen [rwan], made several voyages to Tad-ou-sac, and brought home cargoes of the rich furs which had been collected there fvom places north of it. A stone building [the first ever put up in Canada] was erected there, and for a time the fur trade was prosperous. Subsequent voyages, however, having proved unsuccessful, De Chaste, the governor of Dieppe [de-epp], formed a company of Rouen and other merchants to prosecute the traffic in furs more vigorously. 2. Champlain's First Voyage. — The first expedition to Questions.— What is said of feudal system and the seigniorial tenure ? Giff'e the particulars of the Marquis de la Roche's expedition and of the fate of the convicts and of himsslf . y 20 • SKKTCII OF B. N. AMERICA. [Paut II-10(J3. Canada, projected by this company, coiifiistod of tliree small shipfl. It waH placed under the command of Samuel de Champlaiu [.shaum-plan'*], a distinguiwhed ca{)tain in the Fren(!h navy.* In com})any with Dupont Grave he reached tlie St. Lawrence in 1(50.*}, and lost no time in pushing his wny up the river as far as Ilochelaga, stop}>ing at Three Rivers to examine its fitness for a trading j)()st. When he reached liochelaga, he found it deserted except hy a few Algoii- (piins. With some of these Indians he essayed to {)a88 the rapids of the Sault St. Louis [soo-sanMoo-ee] (Lachine) in his hoats, but could not, owing to tlie strong current. He obtained from the Indians rude sketehes on baik of the river and country above the raj)i(ls, and carefully noted all he saw. Having j)reparod for the information of the King, Ilenfi IV., a chart, illustrating his explor- . ations, he and Dupont (ii-ave returned to France. 3. Ghatnjylain's Second Vot/fn/c — Aradie aet.flcd. — Tlie French monarch (Henri IV.) regai'ded C'hanii)lain's ex- plorations with favor-t V\n)\\ De ('haste's death, he con- * Samuel de Clinniplnin, a native ui Bioiintro, in Frame, explored the St. LawreiK-e, vvilli Juijiont (Jrave, fumi TjhIoiihju' to 'I'liree KiverH, in 180M-7. On the third .lulv, U <'X, he l'<)ini»le«l the city ot Quebee. In lOO!), ho ascended tlie river l^icln lieu [r<('('h-«l-yu],;in(lavid K3U, restored. In J(vW, he was ai)pointed the lirst governor of Canada. Lie died in 16155, very deep)y regretted- t Henri de Bourbon, the celebrated King of France and Navarre, was born at Paris in 1553. He was the tliird son of Anthony de Bourbon and Jane d'Albret, heiress of Henri d'Albret, King of Navarre. O/i the sud- den death of his mother, who was a Huguenot, and "who h^ brought up her son to the Protestant faith, he became King of Navarre. Just before his death by assassination, Henri III., King of France, acknowledged the King of Navarre as his lawful successor. Henri IV. had, however, to wage a war against *' the League " before he obtained the crown. One of his splendid victories over the Leaguers is celebrated by Lord Macaulay in his stirring ode on the •' Battle of Ivry." At length, Henri, having ab- jured the Protestant faith, tlie opposing party acknowledged Lim as King Questions.— Mention the causes which led to the first formation of a French company of merchants to promote trade with the New French Col- ony. Describe Champlaiu's first voyage, and give a sketch of his life. Chap, ni-lflon.l CHAMPLAIN*S VOYA0K8. 21 Jferred upon Pierro Dii«;a8, Sieur do Monts, [mohn*] governor of Pons, (ji distingnlHhed Huguenot), greatly enlarged trading privileges. He iiUo made him lieutenant- general of Acadie.* In eompany with Champlain, Dnpont Grave and l)e Poutrineonrt, [poo-truhn*^-koor], de Monts, with a very mixed elassof colonists, saihid in March, 1G04, for Acadie, (Nova Scotia), whi(rh lu^ preferred for his pro- posed colony. De IMonts having reached Cape la Heve, Nova Sco- tia, waited a month for Dnpont Grave'K store ship, at Port Mon- ton (so called from a sheej) which had fallen overboard out of the ship). They then nuuK. their way round the pcuiinsnla into a large hay which de IMonts named La Haie FrMn(;aise; (now called Fundy). While Dii})ont Grave saikid for Tadonsac to trade with the Indians, de Monts pursued his voyage, and discovered a beau- tiful spot, near an enclosed sheet of water which he named, Port Royal (An-nap-o-lis). Poutrincourt, who was de- lighted with the place, selected it as a site for a settlement ; and de Monts, who by his patent owned one half of the continent, made him a grant of it. This grant — the first ever made in America — was afterwards confirmed by letters patent from Henri IV. De Monts then sailed in search of a suitable place for his new colonists. He dis- covered the St. John river, and proceeding on, at length Henri IV of France. of Franco in 150.3. To hiH distinguislied minister, tlio Duke de Sully, lie was indebted for an able administration of the Hnance antl of the f^eiiural affairs of the kingdom. After reigning twenty-one years he was in turn assassinated, and in 1610 was succeeded by liis son Louis XIII. * This name first appears in a public document in 1604, when Pierre Du Guast, or Dugas, sieur de Monts, petitioned King Henri IV., for leave to t^olouize " La Cadie, or Acadie." The name is supposed to be derived from La-quod-tHe, the Indian name of a local flsh called a pollock. Questions.— Give a sketch of Champlain's second voyage in 1604. Men- tion the discoveries which he made in this expedition. Who succeeded i de Chaste? What is said of Poutriucourt'u settlement and the grant i which was made of it to him ? 22 SKETCH OP B. N. AMERICA. [Pakt II-1(J03. fixed upon a rooky islot, at tlift month of jinofhor rivor, wliicli lie niuned St. Croix. Here lie remained dnrinir the winter, while Champlain explored the coast as tar as Penohscot. In the following summer he went in search of a more eli » 84 HT8T0RT OP CANADA. [Part II— lfl26. Mass^ and de Brebcuf), wore, at the request of the Recollets, sent to Canada in 1625. Thus the order obtained a footing in Canada — fourteen years after two of its members had reached Nova S(;otia. De Caen wouhl not receive them, but the liecollets admitted them into the SL Charles conreut. De Brebeuf undertook a mission to tlie Ilurons ; but tlie fate of Viel, the Kecollet, (who was drowned by the Indians at a place near Mon- treal, since callwl Snuk au Recollet^) deterred him for a time. The Duke's well-meant but exclusive policy did not please Cbamplain, who returned to Canada in 1626. His objections were shared in by the Cardinal Uichelieu [reesh-elyue], who revoked the charter of the De Caen Com- pany in 1 627, and instituted a new one upon a broader basis. This dissociation was clothed with extensive powers, and named " The Company of One Hundred Partners." From it the Huguenots were excluded. It was invested by the king with the vice-royalty of New France and Florida, and with the " at- tributes of seigniory and jus- ticeship, with power to assume for its infeoffed lands such titles, deeds, honors, rights, powers, and faculties as should be judged fitting." Thus, in Canada, the seigniorial tenure, or feudal system, was exten- ded and consolidated. The French monarch also raised twelve of the principal seigneurs to the rank of French noblesse. Shortly afterwards King Charles I. established the order of Baronets of Nova Scotia in that country. 12. First Capture of Quebec. — Scarcely had the new Company been organized, ere war was declared between Cardinal Richelieu. QiTESTioNB.— What change was made in the trading company? Sketch De Caen's career. What religious order arrived In 1625? How wei« they receired ? State what further changes were made. What is said of the oreation of the Seigniorial tenure, of the noble$ni of Canada, and of Nova Scotia Baronets ? Chap. IV.-1M2.] SKETCn OF FRENCn RULE. 85 Franco and England. The first ships which the Company sent to Canada wore captured ; and shortly afterwards Tadousac fell into the hands of the English. The cap- ture was made by Sir David Kertk, a French Huguenot refugee from Dieppe (who had been conimisHioned by Charles I., in 1()2«), and Captain Michel, formerly in the service of the De Caens. Kertk sent some Hascpio pris- oners as messengers to Quebec, which was not very strongly fortified, and summoned it to surrender ; but Champlain, who sent back a haughty reply, treated them 80 well, that Kertk withdrew hia ships to cruise in the gulf without attacking him. On his way down the river, however, he captured some French transports laden with food and stores, which Roquemont (one of the new com- pany) was bringing to Quebec. Owing to this loss the colony suffered great privation. Next year Kertk again appeared before Quebec, and, after having offered honora- ble terms to Champlain (who was reduced to great straits), the heroic governor capitulated the city in July, 1629. Kertk, having installed his brother; Louis, as governor of Quebec, went to Tadousac, where Thomas Kertk followed him with Champlain. Here Cai)tain Michel died. Shortly afterwards, Kertk took Champlain to England, where he was released and sent to France. Disasters did not long oppress the infant colony ; for, by the treaty of St. Germain-en-Laye, in 1682, Charles 1. of England, restored not only Canada, but also Cape Breton and Nova Scotia, to Louis XIII. of France. 13. Death and Career of Ckamplain. — In 1632, Emery de Caen came to Quebec to hoist the French standard once more upon its walls. He was authorized to enjoy the profits of the fur traffic for one year, so as to indem- nify him for losses sustained during the war. In 1633, Champlain again returned to Canada as governor. He at once sought to restore prosperity, and to promote civili- QUESTIOKS.— What trouble arose ? Describe the first capture of Que- bec. Under what circumbtancea was Canada, Cape Bretoi? and Nova Scotia restored to the French ? "86 HISTORY OF CANADA. LPaeT 11.-16W. zation among the Indians, by means of the JeauifmisBiou- aries. In 1634, a new settlement was formed at Three Rivers. In the midst of these signs of returning life and vigor, the young coU)ny was called upon to suffer a signal loss, — the death of her beloved Chani{)lain on Christmas day, 1635, after a checkered yet noble career of heroic endurance in the service of France in Canada, of nearly thirty years. He was a man of unusual energy and d<>,- cision ; but his early zeal against the Irocjuois was ill- judged. He wrote three volumes, at intervals, contain- ing an interesting account of his voyages to Canada. He also wrote a history of New France, and a summary of Christian doctrines, which latter was translated into both the Huron and Iroquois languages. 14. New Viceroy — Montreal Founded. — I)e Chateaufort was temporarily appointed to succeed Champlain ; but in 1636, he became Governor of Three Rivers, on the arri- val from France of De Montmagny [mont-man-yee], the new Viceroy, — who sought to emulate Champlain in his zeal for the colony.* In 1636, the foundation of the Jesuit College for the Hurons was laid at Quebec. In 1637-42, Noel Brulart de Sillery, a benevolent knight of Malta, founded an institution four miles above Quebec, fur the Indian converts. This he named after St. Joseph — who had been selected as the patron saint of Canada in 1624. The vear 1638 was noted for several severe shocks of eartlKpiake, which were felt all over the French and P.nglish colonics. In 1640, the island of Montreal was ceded by M. de Lauzon [law-zon^] for the purposes of settlement, to an association of thirty-five . persons. * Le Chevalier Charles Huault de Montmagny. During his adminiatra- tlon, Montreal was founded, and the long threatened war of extermina- tion against the Huron Indians was commenced by the Iroquois. It was to this governor that the Indians first applied the term Onfio, or Nontion, t\\e great mountain, — a literal translation of M. de Montmagny's name. The term was afterwards applied indifferently to each of the French governors of Canada. 0-non-ti-o-go-a (or On-ti-o-go-a) was the Indian name of the king of France. "* Questions — Sketch Champlain's further career and life. Who suc- ceeded him ? What is said of M. de Montmagny ? Wliat iuiititutioui w«re founded in L. C. during the years 1636 to 1612 ? , '^ ' Chap. IV.-1C42.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 37 IIo had, in 1635, obtained it from the Company of On© Hundred Partners. IVl. de Malsonneuve [niay-Hon*-nev] was Helected to found the settieuient, which he did under many discouragenKUits in 1042. He first erected a few buildings, near the site of the Indian vilhige of llochelaga, and enclosed the whole of tlit^ni within a wooden palisade, for protection against the Indians.* On the 18th day of May, 1(542, the humble settlenient was with religious ceremonies solemnly named Ville Marie, or Ma-ri-an-op-o-lis, by the su|K;ri()r of the .Jesuits.! If). Concerted Indian Attacks. — lii 1042, the InKjuois were successful in their attacks upon the French; and in -the next year, M. d'Ailleboust erected defences around Montreal. In 1044, the Iro(|uois concerted a bold scheme to destroy the whole line of French posts, — a scheme which, witli singular exactness, was again repeated by other Indian tribes, against the English [)ost8, one hundred and twenty years afterwards.^ In that year (1044), the Iroquois, who were friendly to the Dutch and English, but who were bitterly hostile to the French, and to their allies (the Algoncjuins and Hurons), formed a plan by which they hoped to exterminate in a single day all the French colonists in Canada. They divided their warriors into two great bauds, and these two bands into ten sep- * Paul Chomedy de Malsonneuve was, in 1642, Installed as first governor of Montreal, by M. de MontmaKny. Through the intrigues of M. de Mfesy, [may-see] he was, in KHf), at his own recjuest, replaced for a time, in the government of Montreal by M. Louis d'Ailleboust de Coulonge [day- yee-Doo-d'-koo-lawn]. He went to France in 164(5, but returned in 1648, when M. d'Ailleboust left for France. t Montreal was known to the Iroquois by the name of Ti-o-ti-a-ki, as it stood upon the site of an Indian village on the banks of the river which was known to Jacc^ues Carti«5r as Tu-ton-a-(iui. Hochelaga was situated near the side of Mount Royal. This mount was called by the Algonquins Mo-ni-ang, which is very similar to the French pronunciution of Montreal. X In 17(53, Pon-ti-ac, a celebrated chief of the Ottawa Indians and an ally of the French, matured a bold and comprehensive plan for the destruc- tion of the English by the simultaneous capture of all their forts from Lake Michigan to the* Niagara. The plot failed. See No. 63, Chapter V., page 103. Questions.— Mention the circumstances connected with the founda- tion of Montreal. What is said of M. de Malsonneuve ; and of the year rlfi44 ? Give a sketch of the Iroquois scheme for destroying the French I of trading posts in 1644. Had it any after parallel ? Mention it. at ii said of Pontiao ? 88 HISTORY OP CANADA. [Part 11.-1642. 4 arate war-parties. In the ensuing spring these war-parties were, on a given day, simultaneously to attack the French settlements from several ambushed points, which were se- lected with more than the usual skill and sagacity of the keen-eyed Iroquois. The party of warriors designed to sur- prise Montreal was fortunately discovered by the garrison and defeated ; while other parties, having acted premature- ly, were foiled in their attempts. Thus although the project failed for want of unity of action on the part of the Iroquois bands, yet many valuable lives were lost and the very exis- tence of the colony itself was for a time imperilled. In this crisis, Anne of Austria, the Queen Regent of France, and protectress of Canada (on the death of Cardinal Riche- lieu and Louis XIII., in 1642-3), at once sent out a com- pany of soldiers to aid in the protection of the colony. Fort Richelieu, which had been erected with great diffi- culty in 1642, by Governor Montmagny, at the mouth of the Iroquois (Richelieu) river to keep these Indians in check, was a principle point of attack ; but, although the force within the fort was small, it was successfully defend- ed. At length, in 1 645, through the agency of some pris- oners, the Governor induced the Iroquois to consent to a peace. A truce followed, to which the Mohawks, liurons, Algonquins, and French were parties ; but the rest of the Iroquois cantons would not concur in it. It was entirely repudiated by them in 1646, at the instigation of some treacherous Hurons. On the frivolous pretext that an epidemic and a failure in the crops (which had lately occurred) were caused by the machinations of Pere Jogues,* * Isaac Jogues, a native of France, came to Canada in 1636, and labored as a missionary among tlie Hurons. He was taken prisoner by the Iroquois in 1<)42, and was shamefully mutilated. Arendt Van Corlear, the humane Dutch (xovernor of New Netlierland, rescued liim and other French prison- ers. Within a short time he went to France, l>ut soon afterwards returned to Canada. Ih 1646, when on his way to ratify a treaty witli the Iroquois, he gave the name of St. Sacrament to the Lake called afterwards Lake George by Sir VVm. Jolinston. On his arrival among the Iroquois, he fell a victim to his zeal, as stated above. Questions. — What is said of Anne of Austria, and of Fort Richelieu? How was a truce brought about ? Upon what pretextB waa it broken ? iSkotcb Jogues' lif «. Chap. 1V.-1<^42.] SKETCH OP FRENCH RULE. 39 — who had been sent to ratify the treaty with the several cantons : — this Jesuit father was barbarously murdered. Ferocious attacks were also made upon other Jesuit mis- sionaries, and*several of the settlemetits, so that war and rapine again desolated the country. Taking advantage, however, of a partial cessation from strife, the Company of One Hundred Partners, which had suffered such terri- ble losses dui-ing the struggle, made an important change in their relations to the colony. The Company conceded to tke inhabitants of Quebec, Tliree Rivers and Montreal tlie right to trade in peltries, under certain restrictions, and on the early payment to it of one thousand beaver- skins, besides some local expenses of the government. This arrangement was conhrmad by royal edict; and the Company consequently renounced all further right to in- terfere in the internal trading concerns of New France. 16. Destruction of the Hurons. — M. de Maisonneuve having declined the office of governor, M. d'Ailleboust succeeded M. Montmagny, as governor in chief, in 1647. The latter had remained in Canada for three years, and had proved himself to be an able man. During his brief administration the Jesuit missionaries so greatly extended their explorations and labors among the Indians in the interior, especially to the north-west, that the religious interest in the colony was greatly increased in France. Irritated at the continued alliance of the Hurons with the French, the Iroquois formed a scheme for their utter ex- tinction. The 4th of July, 1648, was selected as the com- mencement of this terrible episode in Indian warfare. On that day they fell upon the Huron settlement of St. Joseph, and destroyed the whole population, numbering 700. Every wigwam was burned; and as if to give more malig- nant vent to their hatred to the religion of the pale faces, they set fire to the church, and then threw the mangled and bleeding body of Pere Daniel, the Jesuit missionary, - ■ - — ■■ '^ QTTE8TION.S.— What followed the breaking of the truce ? Mention the steps taken by the company to place trade on a tirni basis. What is said of M. de Montmagny'* govenim«ut ? Why were th« Iroquoii* so liostilo to th« Hurons ? 40 HISTORY OP CANADA. [Part n.-l«4T. its pastor, into the midst of the flames. They then sud- denly withdrew, leaving the rest of the mission settle- ments in a state of terror during the remainder of the year. Early in the following March a band of Iroquois swooped down like an eagle upon St. Ignace and St. Louis (two Huron settlements near the great lakes), and put to death four hundred of their inhabitants. At St. Louis the veteran Brebeuf and the gentle Lalemant (who for twenty years had subjected themselves to every kind of hardship as Jesuit missionaries), were put to ^eath with excruciating tortures. Each successive settlement was visited in like manner, and with a like result. Soon, in self-defence, the hunted Hurons stood at bay ; and for a time, alternate success and defeat followed each other with fatal rapidity, inflicting on them terrible losses. At length, in a final struggle for their very existence and for the possession of their homes and hunting-grounds, they were defeated by the unsparing Iroquois, tjtterly routed, the unhappy Hurons, accompanied by some of their mis- sionaries, fled to the upper lakes, and at length found a resting-place on the island of St. Joseph. Here, during the winter, disease and want of food rapidly reduced their already thinned ranks. Some of them fled to the shores of Lake Superior, and sought the powerful protection of the Ojibways. Here a decisive battle took place on a spot which, from this circumstance, was named Point Iroquois, or ^* Place of the Iroquois bones ; " and for a short time the Hurons were sheltered. Others sought the protec- tion of the Ottawa Indians, but were, even with them, again pursued and dispersed. Many of the survivors were, after the old Roman custom, incorporated into the Iroquois tribes, while others fled to Montreal and Quebec by the circuitous route of Lake Nipissing and the Ottawa, and for years remained encamped within the walls of Quebec, or were elsewhere placed under French protec- QuESTiOKS — Mention the successive attacks of the Iroquois which fin- ally led to the destruction of the Huron Indians. Where was the remain- i»x of th« tribe placed ? Chap. IV. -1647.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULB. 41 tion. After the storm had passed over, they were trans- ferred to Ste. P^'oye ; and thence to Lorette, where their descendants now remain. 17. Proposed Union of the English^ French and Dutch Colonies. — The four New England colonies had, in 1643, formed a union or alliance. It was afterwards proposed that this union should include all the European colonies in America — English, French and Dutch — so as to form one great community, whose existence should not be im- perilled by the politics or wars of Europe, Each colony, it was intended, should retain its own laws, customs, re- ligion arid language. 18. Projected Alliance with New England. — With a view to carry out this scheme of colonial union, Governor John Winthrop of Massachusetts wrote to the governors of New Netherlands and Canada in 1647. The Dutch governor responded favorably at once, but the French governor delayed doing anything until 1650, when he despatched Pere Druilletes* to Boston, to propose as an additional article of union that New England should join Canada in chastising the Iroquois. On his return with a somewhat favorable report, d' Ailleboust, in 1651, despatched Pere Druilletes and M. Godefroy, as am- bassadors to Boston, to negotiate a treaty. The French, having suffered so severely from the Iroquois in their peltry-traffic, pressed their point, and declined to enter into any treaty unless the English would consent to * Gabriel Druilletes was bom in France in the year 15S3. He became a Jesuit father, and was sent to Canada in 1643. He labored chielly among the Algonquin and Abnakis Indiana at Sillery, Tadoneac, An- tico8ti, Chaudidre and Kennebec. In 1650 he was sent alone by the gover- nor as envoy to Boston. On his return, ho paid a friendly visit to John Eliot, the famous English apostle to the Indians of New England, at Roxbury. In 1651 he accompanied Sieur Godefroy to the same place to negotiate a treaty with the English colonies. In 1666 he instructed P6re Marquette in Montagnais, and accompanied him to the Western lakes. In 1669 he was atSault Ste. Marie where ho labored for many years. At length he returned to Quebec, where he died in 1681, aged 88 years. . ; Questions.— What notable events took place In the years 1643, 7-8 ? What was done to brinf^ about a commercial alliance between New Eng- land and Canada? Sketch Druilletes' lifo. What celebrated Engliin Missionary did he visit at Roxbury ? 42 HISTORY OF CANADA. [Part II.-1W4. turn their arms against the Iroquois. This hostile stipu- lation on the part of the French, against the Indian allies of the English, although skilfully presented as a right- eous league in defence of Christianity against scoffing Pagans, broke off the negotiations, and the scheme un- happily. failed. When this stipulation became known to the Iroquois, it exasperated them still more ; and they redoubled their efforts to destroy the French colonists ; so that for several years the French, like the ancient re- builders of Jerusalem, labored with arms in their hands, and were virtually kept within their enclosures and be- hind their entrenchments. Trade entirely languished ; and the beavers were allowed to build their dams in peace, none of the colonists being able or willing to molest them. 19.^ Lull in the Indian Contest. — M. de Lauzon, a chief member of the Company of One Hundred Asso- ciates, succeeded d'Ailleboust as governor in 1651; but he was not successful as an administrator. The Iroquois, having nearly succeeded in extirpating the Huron allies of the French, continued to attack the French settlements ; and it was not until 1653 that they ceased their warlike inroads upon the colony. In that year reinforcements arrived from France ; and the Iroquois, not wishing to encounter their now formidable enemies, intimated a strong desire for peace. A treaty was accordingly entered into in 1 654, with the five Iroquois tribes, or cantons, through the intervention of Pere le Moyne, and for a time war ceased to alarm the colonists. Trade soon revived, and the peltry-traffic was vigorously prosecuted by the French with such of the Iroquois cantons as were near the boundaries of Canada. 'The others, however, preferred to traffic with the English. During the intervals of war, explorations were made among the Sioux [see-ou] Indians, beyond Lake Superior, and also among the Esquimaux, near Hudson Bay. The year Questions.— What additional article did the French insist on ? To what state were the French settlements reduced ? After Lauzon's ap- pointment how did the Iroquois act? What l«d to peace ? Chap. IV.-1664.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 43 1656 was noted for an overland expedition which was sent from Canada, by way of Labrador, under Sieur Jean Bourdon [boor-dong,] attorney -general of New France, to take possession of the Hudson Bay territory on behalf of the French King. 20. French Settlements among the Iroquois. — In accord- ance with the charter of the One Hundred Associates, the tributaries of the St. Lawrence were included within the trading territory of that company. Under its authority the French colonists made attempts in 1 654-7, through the Jesuit missionaries, to form mission settlements among the L-oquois. With the quasi consent of these Indians, Pere le Moyne planted a mission among the Mohawks, Dablon among the Onondagas, Mesnard among the Cayugas, and Chaumonot among the Senecas. The English colonists, however, steadily resisted all these efforts of the Jesuit missionaries to settle among the Iroquois. Dissensions, at length, arose among the Iroquois themselves in regard to these encroachments upon their territory ; and they refused to admit the right of either the English or French to claim jurisdiction over it. A collision soon occurred ; and three Frenchmen were scalped by the Oneidas. The French retaliated and seized some Iroquois braves. The consequence was that in 1656-7 a fierce and unrelenting Indian war once more desolated the country. D'Argenson [dar-zhon"-yons], the new Governor, who arrived in 1659, implored the French Government to send immediate succor, else Canada would be forever lost to France. His requests, however, were unheeded ; but the Iroquois, having unexpectedly met with a determined resistance from a few French colonists, under Daulac, in a palisaded post at the foot of the Long Sault rapids of the St. Law- rence, soon afterwards desisted from their concerted attacks * upon Montreal, Three Rivers, and Quebec. Thus relieved from their fears, religious services were held by the colon- QuESTiONS — Give an account of the exploration to the Hudson Bay. What French Mission settlements were attempted among the Iroquois ? Wliat led to war again ? Why were the Iroquois induced to desist from their liere« attaoks ? 44 HISTORY OF CANAViA. [Part n.-l«83. ists in all the churches of Quebec ; and a solemn Te Deum was chanted lor their happy deliverance, 21. Royal Government established.- — In 1 650 a royal edict regulating the civil government of the colony was issued. In the same year, Mgr. de Laval arrived in Quebec as Vicar- Apostolic of the See of Rome.* In 1660 he sent Rene Mesnard as a missionary to the Huron s on Lake Superior. In the following year this aged priest missed his way in the woods, and was never seen again. His cassock and breviary were, however, afterwards found. M. d'Argenson having solicited his recall, M. d'Avau- gour arrived as governor in 1661. Through the efforts of Pere le Moyne [leh-mwoyn], he effected, in 1662, another treaty with three cantons of the Iroquois. Fear- ing its short duration (as two cantons had not concurred in it), he sent M. Boucher [boo-shay], the commandant at Three Rivers, to the king of France with another appeal for aid. The king immediately sent out a regiment under command of Sieur Dumont, who was also, as royal com- missioner, directed to report upon the state of the colony. In the meantime d'Avaugour [da-vo-goor] was recalled at the instance of Mgr. de Laval ; and M. de Mesy, who had been nominated by that prelate, was sent out as the first royal governor under the new constitution, — d'Avaugour having, in 1663, induced King Louis XIV. to dissolve the Company of One Ilundre77 ? Describe the spirit Hpf discovery which wiui characturiHtic of the early settlomunt ot' Canada. I 52 HISTORr OF CANADA. [PART II.-1674. realization of Coligni's* [kol-een-ee] gigantic scheme of French colonization from the St. Lawrence to the far west, and from the sources of the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico, and even to the shores of South America. 5. Summary of Discoveries. — After Champlain, other explorers extended their researches westward during 1630. In 1640, the southern shores of Lake Erie were visited by Peres Chaumonot and de Breboeuf [bre-boohf]. In 1 647, Pere du Quesne [due-kehn] went up the Sague- nay and discovered lake St. John. In 1651, 1661, and 1671, expeditions were sent northwards towards the Hud- son Bay, with more or less success. In 1646, Pere Druil- letes ascended the Cliaudiere [shode-yare], and descended the Kennebec to the Atlantic. In 1 659, the Sioux were visited by adventurous traders; and hi 1660 Pere Mes- nard reached Lake Superior. In 1665 Pere Alloiiez coasted the same lake and formed a mission at the Bay of Che-goi-me-gon. In 1668, Peres Dablon and Marquette formed a settlement at the Sault Ste. Marie. In 1670 and 1672 Alloiiez penetrated with Dablon to the Illinois region, where they first heard of the mysterious Missis- sippi — the " great father of waters." 6. Discovery of the Mississippi. — In T671, the famous Pere Manjuette, [mar-kett] formed a settlement of the Hurons at St. Ignace, near Michilimackinacf Two years later. Talon, ever anxious to promote comprehensive schemes of exploration and discovery, despatched, ere he ♦Gaspard de C<»ligni, admiral of France, was born in 1516. He pro- jected a conipreheuKive sdienio of Fn^nc.h colonization, which, however, was 11 over reaJized. He fell a victim to the fury of the populace of "Paris against the Calvinists or liujjueuots, on St. Bartholomew's Day, 1572, t Pere James Marquette, a fJesuit missionary, was born at Picardy. in France. While a missionary at liapoint, on I^ke Superior, he expressed a (lesireto preach the Gospel to the southern IndJans, and was chosen by Juliette to accompany him on his exjiedition to the Mississippi. He re- n)ained in the north-west with the Illinois Indians, and died soon after his retuin from the exi)loration, at the early age of thirty-eight years. His narrative of the discovery was afterwards published. QuKSTiONS.— What circumstances led to the discovery of the Missis- sippi River? What is said of Coligiiii, and of his scheme of colonization? Give a summary of the explorations and discoveries made. Sketch the career of P6re Marquette and of Joliette. 3HAP, v.— 1674.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 53 left for France, M. Joliette* [zhol-ee-yet] with Mar- [jiiette to obtain a further ehie to the ijreat uniloration8 of Joliette and Mar- lette. Were they succcBsful in their discoveries? What tribe of In- |an8 did they meet \dth ? How far did they pursue their researches ? it was the fate of Marquette f 54^ HISTORY OF CANADA. [PART U.— 1680. Joliette had hastened to Quebec, by way of what is now the city of Chicago, to announce their great discovery. As a reward for his share in it, and for other explorations, Joliette received a grant of the island of Anticosti in the St. Lawrence, and a seigniory near Montreal. 7. La Salle's First Expedition to the Mississippi. — Fired with the news of this notable discovery, Sieur de la Salle, a French knight, then at Quebec, determined to complete the discovery, in the hopes of finding a new route to China."* After visiting France, he obtained a royal commission to proceed with his exploration. The seigniory of Cataraqui, including fort Frontenac, was con- ferred upon him, on condition that he would rebuild the fort with stone. The Chevalier de Ton-ti, an Italian, and Pfere Hen-ne-pinf accompanied him ; and together they constructed three vessels. Proceeding up Lake Ontario, they reached Niagara, where la Salle erected a palisade. Here they visited the great Falls, of which Father Henne- pin wrote an elaborate description. Above the Falls, la Salleconstructed another vessel, named the Griffon. Liher the party traversed Lake Erie ; and on their way to Lake Huron, la Salle named the intermediate lake *' Ste. Claire." Having reached the southern part of Lake Michigan, he sent the Griffon back to Niagara with a cargo of furs. The vessel, however, was lost on her way down the lake ; and la Salle having erected a fort for trading with the ♦Robert Cavalier, Sleur de la Salle, was ennobled by Louis XIV. He Bought to reach China by way of Canada, and set out oii an expedition for that purpose. His design was frustrated by an accident at a place since called Lachine, or China. He explored the Mississippi from its source to its mouth, in 1678-80 ; spent two years between Frontenac (Kingston) and Lake Erie ; and constructed the first vessel on Lake Erie (near Cayuga Creek). He sought to reach the Mississippi by sea, but having failed, ne Bought to reach it overland. In doing so, he was murdered by his jealous and turbulent followers, who afterwards justly sutfered greatly. t Louis Hennepin, a Recollet, or Franciscan f liar and a French mis- sionary, was born in 1640, and emigrated to Canada In 1675. He accom- panied la Salle In his exploration of the Mississippi, In 1678, and visited the Falls of Niagara, — oi which he wrote an interesting account. QunSTioxs — ^What was the reward of Joliette ? Who determined to complete their discoveries ? Who were his companions and what new route did they hope to discover ? Give an account of La Salle's first ex- pedition to the Misgigsippi. What did he do at Cataraqui and near Ni- agara Falls? rAP.V.—tm.] SKETCH OP FBENCH RULE. S!f' |Miamis, waited in vain for her return. He then turned his steps inland. In December, he reached the head- waters of the Illinois. Proceeding down this river to Laka Pe-o-ri-a, he built fort Cravecoeur near it. Having directed de Tonti to take command of fort St. Louis on the Illinois, he determined to return and learn some news of his vessel. He despatched Father Hennepin down the Illinois river to the Mississippi, up which he directed him to proceed and explore the head-waters of that great river. Hennepin only went as far as the great falls on the river, which, in honor of his patron Saint, he named St. An- thony. During la Salle's absence, de Tonti and his Illi- nois allies were attacked by the Iroquois and compelled to abandon their forts, and retreat. 8. La Salle's Second Expedition to the Mississippi. — Having in part retrieved his losses, la Salle set out again for the Mississippi. He reached it in 1681; but as his posts there were deserted, he returned to Green Bay where he found de Tonti. At length, in February, 1682, he set out again and proceeded slowly down the river, stopping at the mouth of each great tributary, and mak- ing excursions here and there in the vicinity. At length, on the 5th of April, he reached one of the mouths of the great river ; and in honor of the event, he named the sur- rounding country Louisiana, after Louis XIV, and then took formal possession of it in the name of his sovereign. Thus, after many discouragements, this notable event was accomplished by a French colonist from Quebec. 9. La Salle's Third Expedition to the Mississippi. — La Salle soon afterwards retraced his steps ; but having nu- merous envious enemies in France and Canada (among whom was de la Barre, the Governor of New France), he was compelled to return to Quebec, and thence to France to meet his detractors face to face. This he did most suc- cessfully ; and as a proof of the king's confidence in him, Questions.— Wliat did la Salle's companions do and wtiat Is said of each of them ? Give the particulars of la Salle's second expedition to the Minlssippl. - 56 HISTORY OF CANADA. [Pa»t II.— 1688. he wag intrusted with the command of a colonizing ex- pedition whioh was sent to the Mississippi by sea. This expedition never reached its destination. Diiferences with Beaujeu, the commander, led to one disaster after another. The mouths of the Mississippi were passed, and the ships reached the coast of Texas. Beaujeu ran one of the ships on the rocks, and then deserted with another. La Salle and his companions were left to their fate. Having erected a Fort, he left some of his companions in charge, and set out in search of the Mississippi. On his way thither his companions mutinied, put him to death, and afterwards quarrelled among themselves. Most of the survivors, in their efforts to return home, perished miserably, as a just retribution for then* cruelty and crimes. Thus perished, in 1685, the noble la Salle. 10. Internal Dissensions in Canada. — One of the chief difficulties which Frontenac encountered iii his adminis- tration of the government of Canada, arose from a di- vided authority. The sovereign council, the governor-in- chief, and the intendant, had each their separate functions, which were sometimes difficult to define, and which often clashed, or were contradictory. Add to this, the governor of Montreal claimed a certain jurisdiction which conflicted with the supreme authority of the Royal Governor. Dis- sensions between Bishop Laval, Frontenac, and the sovereign council, had long existed in regard to the spirit traffic with the Indians. The bishop protested against its continuance, and sought to have it declared illegal. In- terested parties aided by Frontenac, opposed his benevo- lent purpose. Owing to the influence of the bishop and clergy, two local governors had already been recalled, and Frontenac was threatened with a similar fate. The at- tempted arrest of Perrot, governor of Montreal, for al- leged rapacity and disobedience to the ordinances, brought things to a crisis. Fearful of the consequences of his op- QuE.?TiON's.— Give the particulars of la Sall<»'3 third expedition to the MlssisBippi. How did this last expedition end ? What difficulties in his government had Frontenac to encounter ? Montion the dispute* which arose between the royaJ governor and various other persons. What brought thet« «vonts to a criflis ? Chap. V— 16881 SKETCH OP FRENCH RULE. 57 position, PeiTot came to Quebec to explain ; but he was imprisoned by Frontenac, who for this act was in turn denounced by Abb(^ Feuelon, of the Seminary of Mon- treal. Frontenac sent both Perrot and the abb^ to France for trial. Perrot was pardoned on condition that he would make an apology to Frontenac ; but the abbe was forbidden to return to Canada. Disputes, however, in regard to the liquor traffic, were still maintained between bishop Laval, Frontenac, and Duchesneau [doo-shen-o] (who had succeeded Talon as intendant in 1675). Col- bert, in order to have the matter finally settled, directed Frontenac to obtain for the king, the opinion of twenty of the principal colonists on the subject in dispute. These opinions were obtained and sent to France, but nothing definite was done in the matter. At length the conten- tions on this and various other subjects went so far, that Frontenac and Duchesneau were both recalled in 1682. 11. De la Barre' s Arrival — His Failure. — Dela Barre succeeded Frontenac as governor, and des Meules replaced Duchesneau as intendant. On their arrival, a war with the Iroquois seemed imminent ; and an intimation to that effect, with a request for troops, was sent to the king. In the meantime, colonel Thomas Donjjan * summoned a coun- cil of the Five Nations, in 1784, to meet Lord Howard, governor of Virginia, at Albany, with a view to reconcile disputes. The indecision of de la Barre, however, has- tened the very thing wliich he wished to avert. He set out on a dilatory expedition to Oswego ; but after an in- glorious treaty with the wily Iroquois at Cataraqui (in which he consented to leave the Miamis allies of the French to their fate), he returned to Quebec. Before * Thomas Dongari, afterwards Farl of Llmeriolc, wns a liberal-minded Roman Catholic. He was governor of New York from 1083 to 1088, — when New York was politioally annexed to New England. During his administration, the right of electing members of the House of Assembly was first conferred upon the colonists. QuEgTloirs.— How did they end ? Who succeeded Frontenac and [Duchesneau? How did de la Barre deal with the Iroquois? Give a sketch of Dongan. 58 HISTORY OF CANADA. [PART n.-168e. things, however, came to a crisis, the treaty was disal' lowed by the French king, and de la Barre was replaced by M. de Denonville.* 12. Early Commercial Contests. — The new governor arrived at a critical juncture. The unfettered trade en- joyed by the English colonists at New York had fostered individual enterprise so largely, that aided by their Iro- quois dhes, they had in many places carried on the fur- trade far into the French territory. De Denonville took active steps to protect the trading monopoly of his people, and to check the proposed transference of trade from the St. Lawrence. He remonstrated with Sir Edmund An- dro8,t governor of New England, and with Col. Thomas Dongan, governor of New York. Dongan maintained the inviolability of the Iroquois territory, as being within Eng- lish colonial jurisdiction, and would not allow the French Jesuit fathers to settle in it, although directed to do so by his Roman Catholic viceroy, the Duke of York and Al- bany. In order, therefore, at once to overawe the Iro- quois, and to resist the encroachments of the English tra- ders, de Denonville determined to strengthen the line of French forts, and to make active reprisals both upon the English and the Iroquois. In the meantime, de Troyes * Jacqnen nftn6 de Brisay, Marqiila de Denonville, although an ex- cellent man, failed in his appreciation of the gravity of important events. His desultory and ineffective efforts to subdue the Iroquois only increas- ed their hatred to the French, and ultimately led to the fatal massacre at Lachine. New disputes. ... ^ — -—m- — , - - ^ . » 1 i glnlft. Arendt Van Curler or Corlear, a noted Dutch governor (who lost his life in Lake Champlaln while on his wav to pay a friendly yiwt to the Marquis de Tracy, Viceroy of Canada, in 16fi7), was so loved by Oie Iro- quois that in memory of him they called all their subsequent EngiisH governors by that nam«. The name was first applied to Sir Edmiind An- dros. in 1687'; " for yow was pleased to accept the name, of a man that was of good dispositions, and esteemed deare amongst us (to witte), the old CorXQtLx."— Address of 2.000 Maquaes (the Dutch name for Mohawk Sor cJiems) to Sir Edmund Andros. Questions.— Who succeeded de la Barre ? What was the then state of trade In the French and English colonies ? Give a sketch of de Denon- Tllle and of Andros. What difference arose between the English and French governors ? Chap, v.— 1687.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 5^ and d'lberville* were despatched to Hudson Bay to drive the English traders out of that territory. The French succeeded in taking from them three trading-forts, leaving only Fort Bourbon (Nelson River) in their possession. 13. Failure to restrict . the Peltry Traffic to the Region of the St. Lawrence. — Notwithstanding all the efforts which were made by the French, to restrict the traffic in beaver-skins and peltry within their own territories, and to the St. Lawrence route, they were, in the end, pow- erless to accomplish it. They atone time interdicted trade with the Anglo-Iroquois ; — then they made them presents ; — again they threatened them — made war upon them — invaded and desolated their villages ; — they made treaties with them, and urged and entreated the Dutch and the English to restrain them, and even sought to make the latter responsible for their acts ; — but all in vain. The tide of affairs rolled slowly in against them. The English, who were always heralded by the Iroquois, advanced north- ward and westward towards the St. Lawrence and the great lakes ; nevertheless, the French, still gallantly held posses- sion of their old trading-forts. With sagacious foresight, the French had, in addition to the fort at Quebec, erected from time to time palisaded enclosures round their trading posts at Tadousac, at Sorel, and the Falls of Chambly (on the Iroquois, or Richelieu River), at Three Rivers, Montreal, and Cataraqui (Kingston). Subsequently, to counteract the encroachments of the English, they erected pali- saded posts at Niagara, Detroit, Sault Ste. Marie, Mich-il- * Pierre le Moyne d'lbervilTe was born at Montreal, and was one of the best naval officers of France, under Ix)uiB XIV. He was successful in sev- eral encounters with the English in Hudson Bay and at Newfoundland. In 1699, he laid the foundation of a colony at Biloxi, near New Oi'leans : and having diacovered the enti-ance to the Mississippi, which La Salle had missed, he sailed up that river to a considerable distance. He is consid- ered as the founder of the colony of Louisiana. He died in 1706. His brother, Le Moyne de Bienville, was governor of Louisiana, and founded the city of New Orleans. The county of Iberville, in Lower Canada, has been named after him. ' ■ ■ ' --■ . ■■ II II IM... . .■■ ■■ I ■ 1,1, .^^i^— ■■■■!■■ ■ ■ I IM ■ —■ !■ I — I II »M III! ■—^.^M^^W^^— ■^.I^M^—I ^M^M^M^ Questions.— How did the French succeed in Hudson Bay ? What trad- ing difficulties did they experience ? Give a sketch of Pierre d'Iberville. Mention the successive steps which were taken by the French and Eng- lish to protect and extend the peltry traffic. 60 HISTORY 0¥ CANADA. Part II.— 1688. i-mack-i-nac, and at Toronto. Nor were the English idle, they gradually went up the Hudson river, and erected arm- ed trading-posts at Albany, and at various points along the Mohawk valley ; until at length, in 1727, they fearlessly threw up a fort at Oswego, on Lake Ontario, midway between the French trading posts of Frontenac and Niag- ara. i» 14. The Campaign against the Iroquois opened hy an act of Treachery. — In order to please the king, and to give force to his aggressive policy against the Iroquois, the gov- ernor made Pere Lamberville (missionary among the Onondagas) the unconscious instrument of decoying some of their warriors to Cataraqui, on pretence of conferring with them. On their arrival he seized them and ignomin- iously sent them to France to work at the galleys. De- Champigny [sham-peen-yee], the Intendant, who had suc- ceeded des Meules, in 1684, also shipped off some victims to Marseilles. The Onondaga tribe was greatly incensed at Lamberville's conduct, and at once sent for him. They acquitted him, however, of the treachery, but sent him out of their country. Meanwhile, ' the governor advanced against the Senecas by way of O-ron-^le-quot (near the mouth of the Genesee river), with a superior force. Hav- ing met the Iroquois, he defeated them and burned their village ; but instead of following up his victory, he with- drew with part of his force to Niagara, which he garri- soned ; the remainder he sent back to headquarters. No sooner had the French governor retired, than the Iroquois reappeared on every side. They suddenly attacked the fort at Niagara, and razed it to the ground. They then men- aced the forts at Cataraqui, Chambly and Montreal, and committed many lawless acts of aggression in their fierce and stealthy warfare. 15. Negotiations and Renewed Wars. — Negotiations for a peace were at length opened with the Iroquois through Questions.— With what act of treachery was the war against the Iro- quois Indians commenced ? What expedition was undertaken by the governor? ^ OnAP. v.— IMfi] SKETCH Or TRENCH RULE. 61 Colonel Dongan, the English governor of New York. Dongan stipulated that the captured chiefs should be re' stored, the new fort at Niagara abandoned, and the spoils of the Senecas restored. These terms were refused, until they were enforced by the presence, at Lake St. Francis, of twelve hundred Iroquois. Under these circumstances, de Denonville had no option but to comply with the de- mands. Owing, however, to the hatred which the Iro- quois felf for the French, the dispute was prolonged. At this juncture, A-da-ri-o, or Kon-di-a-ronk (also known as Le Rat), a Huron chief of rare powers, and favorable to the French, took offence at the exclusion of his tribe from the negotiation of a proposed treaty, and by means of a double treachery to the French and Irocpiois, sud- denly precipitated a renewal of hostilities between them. Anxious, therefore, to assume the offensive at once, a project was submitted to Louis XIV in January, 1689, by De Callieres* [kal-le-yare], the governor of Montreal, boldly to attack the seat of English power at Manhattan (New York), and at Orange (Albany). As war had not yet been declared, the project was not entertained by the king. 16. The Year of the Massacre. — War having been de- clared the next year (1689) between France and Eng- land, the contest between the rival colonies, which had become imminent in Canada, at once assumed formidable dimensions. In the following June, the king directed Frontenac to carry de Callieres' scheme into effect. While it was under consideration, the ever vigilant Iro- quois appeared passive, and were even passive in their demeanor to the French. They had, nevertheless, secretly * Louis Hector de Calliferes-Bonnevue, a native of Kormandy, was a member of the Montreal Trading Company, and also governor of the city. He projected the conquest of New York, and was, in anticipation of the Buccess of his scheme, named first French governor of that province. He succeeded Frontenac as governor of the colony in 1698, and emulated him in his zeal to promote the best interests of New France. Questions.— Who involved the two colonies again in war? What did de Denonville propose to do in regard to New York ? Did the king agree with him in hi» project ? Give a sketch of de Callieres. 62 HISTORY OP CANADA. Pabt n.-lM9. acquired information of all the hostile movements of the French. At length, without the slightest premonition, these terrible Iroquois suddenly appeared near Montreal, and in one night of August, 1689, utterly desolated the village of Lachine, and massacred its entire population. They then attacked Montreal, captured the fort and retained possession of the entire island until October. So panic-stricken was de Denonville, the governor, that he gave orders to evacuate and raze Fort Cataraqui. For ten weeks the fiery bands of Irocjuois passed unre- strained through the land, leaving nothing but death and desolation behind them. At length, satiated with revenge, they suddenly forsook the war-path and retired to their lurking-places. 17. Return of Frontenac — His energetic War Measures. — Scarcely had the war-whoop of the retreating Iroquois died away in the French settlements, ere the shouts of welcome to the returning Frontenac sounded iwr and near along the banks of the lower St. Lawrence. De Denon- ville had been recalled and Count de Frontenac again be- came governor of Canada. He brought out with him the captive Iroquois, and during the voyage sought in every way to conciliate them, in which he was partially success- ful. He, however, arrived at a critical period ; for, added to the fierce inroads of the unsparing Iroquois, Louis XIV. had increased the peril of Frontenac by declaring war against Great Britain and her colonies, in order to aid James II., then an exile in France, in recovering his throne from William III., Prince of Orange. Frontenac, in ac- cordance with his instructions from the king, resolved to carry the war into the adjoining English colonies. The Hudson Bay and the outlying New England settlements, were suddenly and successfully attacked. In the meantime Frontenac sent emissaries to meet the Iroquois at Onon- daga, with instructions to detach them from the English, Questions.— What calamity occurred to the French settlements in 1689 ? Describe the sudden attack of the Iroquois. What was the state of Canada on the return of Frontenac as governor ? What act of th« kiug further Increased the peril of the colony ? What was his object ? OUAP. V.-1690.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. (fB — whose weakness he demonstrated by secretly sending a party of French and Hurons from Montreal to Corlear (Sche-uec-ta-dy) [ske-], in the depth of winter of 1689-90. This party burned the town, and massacred nearly all the inhabitants. Another party left Trois Uiridrea for New England, where tliey committed great excesses. A third party was despatched from Quebec to Casco Bay. Being reinforced there by Baron de Castine, and by the victo- rious party from Trois Rivittres, they were highly success- ful in their foray. Nor was the governor unmindful of the French posts on the lakes. Although Fort Cataraqui had been blown up and abandoned by order of de Denon- ville, Durantaye, the commander at Mich-il-i-mack-i-nac, was reinforced ; and Perrot being furnished with presents for the Ottawa and other Indians, was directed to detach these tribes from the Iroquois, who were allies of the English. In this he was successful ; and the Iroquois had to carry on the contest alone. This they did with vigor ; but, so determined a spirit of resistance had Fron- tenac infused into the people, little harm was done by the Iroquois to the French settlements. In the midst of so much peril, the inhabitants, under the guidance of a master spirit, acquitted themselves nobly ; and many were the heroic deeds which they performed. 18. Second Expedition against Quebec^ 1690. — Fron- tenac's successes aroused the English colonists to great activity. Massachusetts, being the leading colony, sum- moned a meeting, or congress, of representatives from the other provinces to meet at New York in May, 1 690. At that congress it was agreed that no time should be lost in equipping two expeditions, — one to attack the French set- tlements by sea and the other by land. Sir William Questions.— Mention the active stept which ho took both against th© English aiid Iroquoii and with what result iu both cases. 64 HISTOUT OF CANADA. CPABT II.-lMl. PhippH* took command of the fleet destined to act by sea againit Quebec, and the son of Governor Winthrop of Connecticut, that of the army destined to co-operate by land against Montreal. Winthrop proceeded as far as Lake George, there to await the success of Phipps' fleet against Quebec. Sickness, however, broke out among his troops, and compelled him to return without accomplish- ing anything. Fn the meantime, the fleet, having pre- viously captured Port Royal and other places in Acadio (Nova Scotia), appeared before Quebec, and demanded the surrender of the place. Frontenac returned a defiant reply, and soon after opened fire upon the fleet. The shot from the ships fell short, while the superior position of Frontenac enabled him to bear upon them with ease. Phipps soon retired with his disabled ships ; but the force which he had sent on shore obstinately maintained the contest, but being overwhelmed, however, they too with- drew, and the walls of the beleaguered town at length re- sounded with the shouts of victory. Frontenac ordered a Te Deum to be sung, and at once penned a glowing des- patch to his sovereign, who in consequence caused a medal to be struck, bearing this proud inscription : — " Francia IN Novo Orbe, victrix ; Kebecca Liberata, A.D., MDCXC." — " France, victress in the new world ; Quebec free, a.d., 1690." Further to commemorate the event a church, (which is still standing in the Lower Town,) was erected in Quebec and dedicated to Our Lady, and named Notre Dame de la Victoire ! 19. Expedition against Montreal^ 1691. — Frontenac's *Sir William Phipps was born of humble parents at Pem-a-quid (Bris- tol), in the present State of Maine, in 1661. Being a sailor, he was so for- tunate as to find large treasure in a Spanish wreck off the coast of His- paniola. This gave him wealth and influence. He was knighted by James I., and in 1669 was sent to take Quebec. In 1692, he was appointed governor of Massachusetts, and greatly exerted himself to promote its .prosperity. He died in 1695, aged forty-four years. Questions.— Mention the expeditions which were sent from New Eng- land against Canada. Who commanded them ? How did they succeea ? Describe the second attack on Quebec. Give a sketch of Sir Wra. Phipps, How did the uoutest end, and how was the victory celebrated? JHAP. V— 1693.] SKETCH OP FRENOH UTTLE. SS victory had the ofTect of chet^kiiig tho in roads of the Iro- [uois. They were not, ut present, disposed to renew the nontest, as a coohiess had arisen between them and the [English. The fickle Moliawks carried their jealousy [of the Engligh so far as to send warriors to Montreal to I enter into a treaty of neutrality in any future contest between the French and English colonies. M. do Cal- lieres, the governor of Montreal, affected indilferenco to their offer, and the Indians withdrew, soon to return and avenge the slight. In the meantime. Colonel Slough- ter, the English governor, held a council with the remain- ing four cantons of the Iroqwois. He so far succeeded in renewing and "brightening tho covenant chain" with them, that tho design of the Mohawks would have been frustrated had they persisted in it. In the same year, Major Schuyler, * who was scHt by tho English colonists of New York, made a bold irruption into Canada through Lake Champlain, and with his Indians defeated de Cal- lieres ; while the Iroquois, by their stealthy warfare under their Onondaga chief, Black Kettle, continued to keep the French settlements in constant alarm. Port Royal was, however, recaptured by the French in November, 1691 ; and in the following January, a New P^ngland set- tlement was surprised and put to the sword. 20. Defences — Partial Cessation of War. — The ever- vigilant Frontenac, fearing another attack on Quebec and Montreal, strengthened the defences of both towns in 1693. He also attacked the Iro(piois "castles," but was compelled by " Quider " to retreat. He again renewed the attempt in 1694. Taking advantage of these succes- sive inroads upon the Iroquois, and their recurring jealousy of the English, he soon afterwards rebuilt Fort Cataraqui * Major Peter Scliuvler was a great favorite with the Iroquois. He was called "Quider" W them, that being the nearest approach to the name of " Peter " which their language would allow. Questions — What was the effect of this victory ? How did the Eng- lish counteract it ? What other attacks were made ? Wlio was Major I Schuyler ? How did Frontenac provide for the successful defence of [Canada? 66 . HISTORY OF CANADA. [Part 11-1694. against their wishes, and named it Frontenac (now Kings- ton). By his skill and courage he compelled the Iro- quois to desist from their attacks, and soon had the satis- faction of seeing comparative peace restored to the French settlements. The inhabitants were thus enabled once more to resume the cultivation of their lands. In the Hudson Bay the French were also successful. In 1694, D'Iberville took from the English the fourth and only re- maining trading-post (Bourbon, on the Nelson River) in their possession. 21. Successful invasion of the Iroquois Cantons. — Frontenac, anxious to put a final stop to the harassing and destructive warfare which had been so constantly waged against him by the unrelenting Iroquois, deter- mined to humble these haughty Indians by invading their territory. He therefore collected a force of 2,300 colo- nists and friendly Indians at Fort Frontenac, in 1696. With this force he marched into the Iroquois territory by way of Oswego. The expedition was partially successful ; but the villages in two cantons were desolated by the Onondaga Indians themselves, rather than allow them to fall into Frontenac's hands. Only one very old chief re- mained, and he was cortured to death at Selina. Before Frontenac's object was fully accomplished, he returned to Canada ; but his raid so excited the fierce enmity of the Iro- quois that they again ravished his territory with fire and tomahawk, and caused a famine in Canada. In return, Frontenac's Indian allies harassed the English settlements even far into the interior. 22. The Cause of these Incessant Wars must be looked for in the determination of both the French and Eng- lish colonists to secure an exclusive right to carry on a traffic for furs with the various Indian tribes. These trad- ing contests were of long standing, and seemed to increase in bitterness every year. Each party invoked the aid of Questions.— What occurred at Hudson Bay? Wliat further steps did Frontenac take against the Iroquois Indians? What success did he meet ■with? How did his expedition against the Iroquois end? Mention fhe oauses of these incessant wars. HAPV.-1696.] SKETCH OF FHENCH RULE. 67 the savages, who were themselves not indisposed to enter Into the contest on their own account, in order that they [might thereby obtain the more favor in trade from the successful rival. Territorial extension, no less than em- bittered national resentment between the French and Eng- lish colonists, gave an intensity of feeling to the contest, and contributed to its duration. It is a striking fact, moreover, which the government of New France either ignored, or never fully realized^ that the chief part of the misunderstandings, difficulties, and contests con- nected with the peltry traffic, had their origin mainly in the persistent efforts on the part of that government to impose upon that traffic unreasonable restraints, and to force it into unnatural channels. In their efforts to do this, their plans were not only counteracted by the energy of the English traders ; but they were even thwarted in them by three separate classes among themselves, — each having different interests to serve, yet all united in their secret opposition to the government. 23. The Three Classes of French Fur Traders were: 1, the Indians ; 2, the trading officials ; and 3, the coureurs de bois [koo-reur-du-bwa] (" runners of the wood," or white trappers). As to the first class (the Indians of these vast territories), they were ever proud of their unfettered for- est life, and naturally disdained to be bound by the arti- ficial trammels of the white man in the exchange of skins for blankets, and for the weapons of the chase. The sec- ond class (the officials of New France) was secretly in league yfii\i l\iQ coureurs de hois against the king's revenue agents — their exactions and their exclusive privileges. The third or intermediary class of traders, or factors (the cou- reurs de io^s), sought in everyway in their power to evade the jurisdiction of the farmers of the revenue at Quebec. Their own reckless and daring mode of life among the In- dians in the woods, far from the seat of official influence Questions.— What was the policy of each colony ? What three claBses of traders are mentioned? Describe them. ♦ 68 HISTORY OP CANADA. [Part 11-1697. and power, gave them peculiar facilities for doing so. Of these facilities they were not slow to avail themselves, especially as they were secretly under the protection, and, even, patronage of one or other of the French colonial governors or judges. These coureurs de bois, through whom the traders obtained furs, were a numerous class ; there was not (says the Intendant Duchesneau, in his me- moir to the king, in 1681,) a family in Canada of any con- dition and quality which had not children, brothers, un- cles, or nephews among them. 24. T/te Treaty of Rysivick, in 1697, at length brought King William's war to a close, and restored peace to tiie rival colonies. France agreed to give up whatever places she had taken during the war ; and commissioners were appointed to fix the boundaries of *he French and English possessions in the New World. No mention of the Iro- quois was made in the treaty. The French governor, how- ever, still sought through the Jesuit fathers to detach the Iroquois from the English, but the English prompted the Indians to prevent the settlement of priests among them. In 1700, a law was passed by the Colonial Assembly, pun- ishing by death every priest who might come to settle in the colony. 25. Death and Character of Frontenac. — The return of peace was signalized by a sad loss to the French colonists, in the death of the great and good Count de Frontenac. He died at Quebec, in November, 1698, aged seventy- seven years. Like Champlain, he had devoted all his energies to promote the prosperity of Canada. By his bravery and sagacity he successfully defended her alike from the inroads of the Iroquois and the intrusive designs of his Anglo-American neighbors. Though quick-tem- pered and haughty, he was brave and fearless. He was much beloved by his fellow-colonists, and died amid their heartfelt regrets. He was succeeded by M. de Callieres, who was then governor of Montreal. Questions.— Describe the courenm de hois. What was agreed to by Prance and England in the treaty of Rrswiclc ? How was the case of the Iroquois Indians (iealt with ? Give a sketch of the career of Frouteuac ? Wbo 8tt««««ded Froutouac? . , > <* M*. I JHA.P. V-1699.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 69 26. Settlement of Louisiana hy D' Iberville^ 1699. — fAf ter the death of La Salle, and the dispersion of his fol- [lowers, no steps were taken to colonize the Mississippi I valley until 1698. In that year D'Iberville, a native of Montreal, and a successful officer in the contests with the British in the Hudson Bay territory, left France and ar- rived in Florida early in 1699. Touching at Pensacola, he entered the Mississippi ; and having partly explored it, he returned and erected a fort at Biloxi, — about ninety nailes north-east of New Orleans. In the following year he brought with him a number of Canadians ; and in 1701 he erected another fort at Mobile, whither he re- moved his colony. During his lifetime the colony pros- pered. 27. Settlement of Detroit hy De la Motte Cadillac, 1701. — To promote the extension of French power and in- fluence among the western Indians, and to secure the trade with them, de Callieres sent, in 1701, De la Motte Ca-dil- lac, governor of Michilimackinac, with an hundred men and a Jesuit missionary to found a colony at Detroit, or the " strait " between Lakes Erie and Huron. The site was well chosen ; and the settlement has more than realized the expectations of its founder. 28. War Renewed — Unsuccessful Expeditions, — In 1702, France and England were again at war ; but the Iroquois, by a treaty with the French governor, agreed to remain neutral in the contest. In 1703, De Callieres died. He was succeeded by the Marquis de Vaudreuil [voh-drah- yee] as governor.* Successive contests with the Miamis ♦ Philip de Rigaud, Marquis de Vaudreuil, one of tlie most successful governors of Canada, first achieved distinction in the Army. He was sent to Canada as conmiander-in-chief, and aided in the relief of Montreal, after the massacre at Lacliine. He aided Frontenac in the defence of Quebec against Sir William Phipps, and in his wars with the Irociuois. He was appointed governor of Montreal, and afterwards succeeded De Callieres as governor of New Prance. During Ins adndnistratiou he ac- complished many useful reforms. He died at Quebec in 1725. Questions.— Give an account of the flrst settlement of Louisiana and of Detroit. Who settled these places ? Sketch the career of D'Iberville. What events occurred in 1702 and 170.3? Who succeeded De Callieres What is said of Marquis de Vaudreuil ? 70 HISTORY OF CANADA. [PART 11-1704. and other western Indians, and against the colonists of New England, took place soon after his apppointment. / The surprise and massacre of the settlers at Deerfield, Massachusetts, in 1704, and at Haverhill in 1708, must ever reflect disgrace upon Hertel de Rouville, the leader of the enterprise. These attacks upon New England, by the French, led to unsuccessful reprisals against Acadie and the French settlements in Newfoundland. Defeat, however, roused the British colonists to renewed exer- tions. They formed a plan to take Quebec and Montreal, and collected a large force under Col. Nicholson at Lake Champlain, as a rendezvous. Col. Schuyler induced the Five Nations to engage heartily in this contest. To bear the expenses of this expedition, the colonies issued the first paper-money ever used in America. Having waited in vain for promised reinforcements from England, the colonists abandoned the expedition, for a time. 29. Further Failures, — The failure of the expedition greatly disappointed the Iroquois. Col. Schuyler, how- ever, to revive their confidence projected an Indian em- bassy \k) England to solicit further aid. He accompanied the embassy, and was highly successful in his mission, be- side gratifying the Iroquois chiefs and interesting the Eng- lish public with a novel sight. 30. The Treaty of Utrecht — The Six Nations — Louis- hourg. — Althougli discouraged, the colonists, still intent upon their scheme of conquest, changed the theatre of war to Acadie. That part of New France they took in 1710. In 1711, 5000 troops, detached from the victorious army of the Duke of Marlborough, having arrived from Eng- land, the expedition against Canada was revived with great vigor. A formidable naval force was despatched from Boston to Quebec, under Admiral Sir Hoveden Walker ; while a large Irtnd force rendezvoused at Lake George. Owing to fogs and storms, the fleet failed to ^ . — _ — — — — QuESTiONS.—Mention the ware which followed De Vaudreuil'a appoint- meut. What plan of retaliation was adopted by the New England colonists? How were the colonists aided from England? Mention the expedition which they undertook. I IChXP. V— 1713.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 71 peach Quebec ; half of it being wreclred ; and the land f force remained inactive. For the present the scheme fail- ' ed, and the army was shortly afterwards distributed along the frontier, for its defence. At length the treaty of Utrecht [u-trek], in 1713, put an end to Queen Anne's war, and confirmed to Great Britain, Acadie, Newfound- land, and the Hudson Bay territory ; besides finally con- ceding to the English their claims to a protectorate over the Iroquois and their territory. The Five Nations, thus relieved from the necessity of further contests with the French, turned their attention to their enemies in the south. Claiming affinity with the Tuscaroras in Carolina, they incorporated them into their confederacy, and it thus became what was afterwards known as the Six Nations. To provide for the maritime defence of Canada (which, as yet, had no protection to the seaward), France lost no time in colonizing the island of Cape Breton. Louisbourg, its capital, was founded in 1713, and, in 1720, was strong- ly fortified at great expense. 31. Peace and Prosperity in Canada. — The return of peace to Canada brought with it also a return of prosper- ity. M. de Vaudreuil set himself to develop the resources of the country, and to foster education among the people. He subdivided the three governments of Quebec, Three Rivers, and Montreal into eighty-two parishes, and took a census of the people. He also extended the fortifications of Quebec, and directed that Montreal should be put in a state of defence. Thus he employed himself until his death, which took place in 1725. In 1720-1, Charlevoix, a distinguished traveller, visited Canada, and afterwards wrote an account of his travels in New France. 32. Further Trading Disputes. — Baron de Longueuil [lohng-gay-ee] administered the government for a year, when the Marquis de Beauharnois [bo-har-nwah] succeed- QUESTIONS. What treaty was made? How did the Iroquois act? Give a sketch of De Vaudreuil's administration and career. What did Charlevoix do ? 72 HISTORY OK CANADA. [Pabt 11-1728. ed de Vaudreuil as governor, in 1726.* By order of the king, and with a view stUl further to counteract the efforts of the British traders, De Beauharnois strengthened the forts at Frontenac and Niagara. Governor Burnet of Now York (son of Bisliop Burnet of England) resolved, in 1727, to neutralize the design of the Marquis by erecting another fort, midway between Frontenac and Niagara, at Oswego. He also had an a(;t passed by the Assembly of New York, subjecting any P^rench trader to heavy loss who would supply the Iroipiois with goods. As an act of retaliation the few English residents at Montreal were peremptorily exiled ; and contrary to existing treaties the new French fort of St. Frederic was erected at Crown Point on Lake Champlain, and a settlement formed there. With a view to punish the predatory acts of the western Indians, M. De Beauharnois, in 1728, despatched a large force to Chicago, by way of the river Ottawa, Lake Nip- issing, and the French River. The expedition was highly successful, and penetrated within a comparatively short distance of the upj)er Mississippi. Efforts were also more or less successfully made' by French agents to detach the Iroquois from the English. As their territory lay between the English and French colonies, and formed a barrier between them, the Iroquois could act against either. It was, therefore, important for both colonies to secure either their co-operation, or their neutrality. 33. The Champlain Fa/%.— This beautiful valley, which had acquired unusual prominence in the intercolonial con- tests which began in 1730, and ended in 1760, was first discovered by Champlain in 1 609. It lies between the States of New York and Vermont, and stretches about 150 * Charles, Marquis de Beauharnois, succeeded De Champigny as Inten- dantin 1702. In 1705 ho returned to France, and in 1720 was appointed Viceroy of Canada. In the twenty-one years during whicli ho adminis- tered the government of New France, he displayed much enterprise anly, sent George Washing- ton to remonstrate with the French commandant, but without effect. In retaliation, three French traders were seized and sent south of the Alleghany mountains. These acts of personal hostility to the traders of either nation by the colonial authorities precipitated a war which had long been threatened, and which was ultimately destined to be a decisive one. 40. The First Memorable Blow Struck. — De la Jon- quiere, who was about to retire, died at Quebec in 1752, and was succeeded, ad interim, by the Baron de Lon Questions.— Mention the first hostile acts in the Ohio valley, which led to the seven years' war. How were they mot by the governor of Virginia ? What changes took place ? 78 HISTORY OP CANADA. [PABT II-17B2. gueuil. Marquis du Quesiie* [(lue-kehn],the new governor, immediately reorganized tlie militia ; hut he was opposed by M. Big()t,t the royal intendant, who intrigueut Colonel Fry, their leader, having in the meantime died suddeidy, the command of the united forces devolved upon the af- Fort du Quesne. • Marquis attlc in Ohio? How did the battle eud? How many troop* were engaged in the buttle ? 3HA.F V— 1756.1 SEETOH or FRENCH RULE. 51 I ■French the possession of the valley of the Ohio for the ■ time. This loss of prestige to the British troops had a I disastrous effect upon the Indians, who joined the French, ' and inflicted great misery upon the English settlements. • General Shirley felt it necessary, under the circumstances, to abandon his projected attack on Niagara. The other expeditions were, however, prosecuted with vigor. 44. General Dieskau's Career. — In the meantime, General Baron Dieskau* [dee-esk-o] had arrived in Canada with a large French force. Hoping to rival the success which had attended the French arms in Ohio, he lost no time in marching from Fort St. Frederic (Crown Point) to attack the advancing columns of the British provincial militia, which had been collected under Gen. Johnson, in the vichiity of Lake George. Leav- ing half of his force at Carillon r. (Ticonderoga), (where a very strong new French Fort had been erected this year), Dieskau came up with a deta" .iiient of Gen. Joiinson's ^Q^voxi,ov.i.K\.^Oeorg^f,^^ under Col. Williams, riormmg an Champialu. I ambuscade, he attacked and scattered the British force I — killing its loader. Col. Williams. He then pushed on to f attack Johnson's chief post at Fort Edward (Hudson River), which had just been constructed by Gen. Lyman. In this he entirely failed, — Johnson being too well posted at Fort William Henry (at the head of Lake George), and his own force being too small. Dieskau, in attacking ■* John Armand, Baron Dieskau, p. lieut.-genoral and commander of tho French forces sniit against Fort Edward. He was found severely wound- ed by the BritisJi soldiers, but was kindly treated by them and sent to Now York, and thence to France, where he died in 1767. In token of tho warm friendship which liad sprung up between him and Sir William Johnson, Dieskau sent hlui, before leaving New York, a handsome sword. Questions — Who was sent out from France ? What did he do, aud what is said of him ? Mention the names of the forts ou the map. 82 HISTORY OP CANADA. [Part 11-1786. Wjlliam Henry, was wounded and taken prisoner, and his men forced to retreat. For Colonel Johnson's prowess in this battle, he was knighted by the king. 45. Ohuse of the Vouble Defeat of Braddock and Dieskau. — By a singular coincidence the two brave gene- rals (Braddock and Dieskau, who had been specially sent out from Europe to conduct the opposing cami)aign in America), failed at the outset of their career. Both failed from a similar cause. They were over-confident in regard to the effect of the discipline of their troops, and vain-glorious of their own European military skill. They looked with indifference, if not with contempt, on the colonial troops, and scorned to be guided by the superior knowledge of the colonial officers, whose experience in desultory forest warfare would have been of the utmost service to them, had tht»y had the good sense to avail themselves of it. As a natural result, defeat and disaster befel them both, together with a loss of prestige to Euro- pean generalship, when tested in the tangled woodsj morasses and swamps of America.* 46. Results of the first Campaign^ 1755. — Sir Wm. Johnson's success at the battle of Lake George led to no practical re- sults ; for in reply to the demand of the British government to demolish Fort St. Frederic (Crown Point), the French still furtlier strengthened ]SiW$, their position in the Champlain Val- fcley. Sir Williamt was unable to march against the French stronghold at Fort St. Frederic, but contented Sir William johuBon. himself with strengthening Fort Wil- * The saci fate of these two uotod Generals, and of the brave men under thoir command, was but too frequently repeated, with more or loea disaster throughout the American Revolutionary War. Thia was owing to the obstinacy of many of the newly arrived royalist officers, who scorn- ed to adopt the more practical strategy and knowledge of Indian forest warfare which was so familiar to their loyalist companions in arms. t Sir William Johnson was born in Ireland in 1715, aud camo to Amer- Qhebtions — Give an account of the battle of Fort William Henry. How was Colonel Johnson rewarded by the kine ? What led to the de- feat of Braddock and Dieskau ? Wliat is said of thoir military wistakil in tix» note ? Mention the reeults of the flrst campaign. Chap. V— 1756.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 83 liam Henry and Fort Edward. He entrusted to Captain Rodgers, a famous ranger, the duty of harassing the garrison at Fort St. Frederic, and having resigned his commission, he returned home. Forts Frontenac and Niagara having been reinforced, the British hesitated to attack them. In Nova Scotia, however, Cohmel Monckton's attack u])on the Frencli posts was com- pletely successful.* Meanwhile the English colonists of New Hampshire suffered great hardships from the in- roads of the St. Francis Indians, through Lake Memphremagog ; while later in the year the French colonists had, in their own coujitry, to endure all the privations of a famine, owing to a scant crop. In December, Gen. Shirley, the com- mander-in-chief, summoned the gov- ernors of the English colonies to a council of war at New York. The scheme which he laid before them was concurred in, and sent to Eng- land for approval. But the French king, Louis XV., not to be forestalled, detei'mined to des- ica In 1738 to manage the lands of Lih uncle (Sir P. Warren) on the Mo- hawk. He was agent of the British Government in its trnnsactioiw with the Six Nation Indians, during the whole of the Seven Years' war. He waH tlie friend of Brant, an|,ho took Fort Niag- ara, and was made a l)aronet. He died in the INIohawk valley, in 1774, aged 60 years. The church which was built by him, and in which he was buried, having been burned in 18.'5(i, his remains were reinterred by Bish- op Potter in 1862. *Hon. Robert Monckton, who afterwards became a Lieutenant-Gener- al in the British Army, and Governor of New York and of Nova Scotia, was the second son of the first Viscount Galway. He 8ervo<'ew York in 1774, aged 63 years. • — QtTESTiON.s.— Give an account of the acts of bravery which Colonel Bradstreet and Captain Rodgers performed. Give a, sketch of Colonel Bradstreet and of General Abercroiuby. Did Oswego hold out ? What did Montcalm do there ? ■Pi' *-. ■• 86 HISTORY OP CANADA. [PAiiT 11—17156. to Fort Oswpfi^o on the opposite side of the river. At tijis fort Col. Mercer, the (!oniniaiulant, having been killed, the garrison surrendered. So exasperated were the Indian allies of the Fnnich at the loss of so many of their warriors, that JMontcalm had to shoot down six of them before they would desist from seal[)ing the prison ers. To conciliate the Jnxpiois, who looked with jealousy upon the British fort in their territory, he destroyed the fort, and returned to Frontenac in triumph, witli 1,400 prisoners (who were sent to Montreal), 134 cannon, and a large amount of military stores. The victory was a most inijiortant one for the French, and added so much to their pi-estige among the Iroquois, that at their solicita- tion, a deputation from each of the cantons (except the Mohawk) went to Montreal to conclude a treaty of peace with De Vaudreuil, the governor. Sir William Johnson set vigorously at work to counteract this fatal influence. By the aid of his faithful friends, the Mohawks, he was partially successful, and dispatched several war parties to harass the enemy. The capture of Oswego had the fur- ther f'ffect of preventing any hostile movenjents on the part of the British commander during the remainder of the year. 49. Progress of the Second Campaign^ 1756. — In the second campaign the French were first in the field. In March, Gen. De Levis with a force of three hundred men suddenly penetrated by way of La Presentation (Ogdens- burg), to Fort Bull, one of the chain of posts between Schenectady and Oswego, and destroyed the magazine there. These successes of the French, and other causes, cooled the ardor of the Irocpiois ; and it required the greatest skill on the part of Sir Wra. Johnson to restore harmony and to " brighten the covenant chain " between them and the English. 50. The Third Campaign of 11 bl— Capture of Fort Questions Give a sketch of the siege. How did it end ? How had Montcalm to interpose to protect the English prisoners ? What effect liad this" victory ? Sketch the progress of the second campaign, of 1766. OHAP.V-1767.1 SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 87 William He7iry. — The success of the French, in 1757, was very marked. On the 18th March, they advanced against Fort William Henry, but were gallantly repulsed by Major Eyre, and compelled to retreat down Lake George. In June, Lord Loudoun (having had a conference with the colonial governors) left New York with a large fleet and G,000 men to take the strong fortress of Louis- bourg, — the key to the French possessions ov the seaboard. At Halifax he was joined by more ships and men ; but having heard tliMt Louisbonrg was largely reinforced, he feared to attack it, and leturned to New York with some of his tro()[) , wlilch he sent to Albany. Part of the fleet sailed to Louishourg on a cruise ; but the ships were dis- abled in a storm, and the commander gave up the enter- prise. In July, Ivieutenant Marin and Combiere made successful attacks upon the English Fort Edward, and upon a fleet of supply boats on Lake George. In the following month, Montcalm himself invested Fort William Henry. Col. Munro, who had only a small force, was called upon to surrender ; but as he expected reinforcements from Gen. Webb (who was in Fort Edward near him), he re- fused to do so. Montcalm vigorously pressed the siege, while Webb, who feared to go outside of his fort, left his gallant companion to bear the brunt alone, and even ad- vised him to ourrciuder. This, Munro indignantly refused to do ; and it was not until ten of his cannon had burst, and his ammunition had failed, that he lowered his flag. Montcalm permitted Munro's little band to march out with all the honors of war. The Indian allies of the French, however (having got some rum from the English, contrary to Montcalm's .advice), treacherously fell upon them ; and before the French general could interpose, thirty of the English were scalped, and two hundred of them car- ried oif as prisoners to Montreal. The remainder were rescued and sent under escort to Webb. De Vaudreuil Questions.— What was attempted to bo done by Ijord Loudoun at Louisbourg? Sketch the third campaign, of 1757. Give an account of the attack by Maiin. What is said of General Webb ? Give an account oJE the siege and massacr at Fort William Uonry, *, 88 MlSTOttY OP CAKAbA. tPARTtl-lM ransomed the two hundred from the Indians at Montreal, and sent them to Halifax. The fort itself was destroyed, and Montcalm retired to Fort St. Frederic (Crown Point), aad Ticonderoga. Scarcely had this reverse been expe- rienced, than another equally disastrous ono fell upon the quiet settlements in the rich German flats on the Hudson, and on those in the Mohawk valley. A large force of French and Indians under Belletre, taking advantage of Montcalm's attack upon Fort William Henry, had sud- denly advanced upon these settlements and swept through them with fire and sword. 51. The Fourth Campaign of 1758. — General Lord Loudoun, the commander-in-chief, having failed to act either with judgment or energy, was superseded by General Abercromby ; and in other respects, the British Cabinet, under the guidance of the elder Pitt, evinced its deter- mination to prosecute the war with unusual vigor. Cir- cular letters were addressed to each of the colonies in March, offering royal troops and warlike material in abun- dance, provided they would select officers and raise such additional men among themselves as miglit be required. Further, as a mark of favor, provincial colonels were raised to the rank of brigadier generals and lieutenant colonels to that of colonels. So heartily were these circu- lars responded to, that in two months twenty thousand colonial troops were sent to Albany, equipped and officer- ed ready to take the field. On the part of the royal forces sent out from England, the campaign in 1758 was signalized by the gallant and memorable capture of Louis- bourg, the fortified capital of Cape Breton ; but on the part of the colonial forces and the regular troops, under Gen. Abercromby, it proved a disgraceful tailure. In July, Abercromby decided to proceed down Lake George and at- tack Montcalm at Ticonderoga. The youthful and gallant Questions.— How did Lord Loudoun succeed ? Who superseded bim ? Give a sketch of the fourth <'ampaign, of 1758. What course did Pitt pursue towards the colony ? Give au account of the proposals made to the colouiea. Lord Howe* was, however, the real soul of the expedition. His untimely death in a slight skir- mish after landing, cast such a damper upon the whole array that Abercromhy felt paralyzed and withdrew his army to the land- ing. Nevertheless the provincial rangers, under Col. Bradstreet and Capt. Rodgers, pushed forward and gained a good position near the fort. Abercromby now ad- vanced, and sent Clerk, an en- ^^^^^ Howe, gineer officer, with Capt. Stark (afterwards noted as an American General in the Revolution), and a few of his rangers to reconnoitre. Clerk recommended an assault ; but Stark advised against it, as the outer defences of logs and branches would only entangle the men, and enable Montcalm to repel any assault made upon him. Aber- cromby refused to take Stark's advice, and ordered the troops to advance. This they did most gallantly, preceded by the provincial rangers as sharpshooters under Rodgers. As vStark had predicted, however, the troops got entangled, and, uncjir a fearful storm of bullets from Montcalm's men, were thrown into confusion. Abercromby at once sounded a retreat, which, had not Bradstreet interposed, would have degenerated into a disgraceful rout. Great was the consternation at this disastrous termination of Aber- cromby's ill-starred expedition. Colonel Bradstreet and the provincial militia burned to wipe out this disgrace. He renewed his entreaty to Abercromby to be allowed a suffi- cient force to raze Fort Frontenac to the ground. A conn- cil of war was therefore held ; and by a small majority the * So beloved was Lord Howe (brother to the Admiral, who succeeded to bis title), that the Legislature of Massachusetts erected a luonuiuent to Lis memory in Westminster Abbey. Questions.— What is said of Colonel Bradstreet, Captain Rodgers and Lord Howe? What part did Abercromby, Stark and Rmlgers take iu the attack ou Fort Ticouderoga ? How did it end ? 90 HISTORY OF CANADA. fPAnx U-ITM. required permission was given. Bradstreet lost no time in joining General Stanvvix at the new lort which he was then erecting at the Oiieichi portage (now Rome), on the Mohawk River. Witii 2,7U() provincials, which General Stanvvix had given him, and about fifty Iro(pioi8 under Red Head and Capt. .1. liutler, he crossed the lake in open boats, and in two days after reaching the fort, com- pelled the commandant to capituhite. Thus was Col. Bradstreet's heroic enterprise crowned with comphite suc- cess ; and all the stores ani>i)liitu(Iitioii a^xaiiiHl LoiiIh- bourg. (;ape Hioloii. Ho took part, with Wolfo in tli«( rautuio of Quebec. 17r»{>, and was in consequoiu'e raitXMl to tho rank of IVln.f«>r-C}«;ni'ral, ana appointed Governor of Virj^inla. lie compelled the cupitulation of Mon- treal in 17(50, and wart appointed Govornor-General of (.'ainula. In I7 guard was overpowered ; and si- Military Operations at Quebec, 1759. lently all that night there toiled up that steep ascent 8,000 British troops. At daybreak, the startUng news reached the camp of the French General that the heights had been scaled, and that the enemy was in a strong position on the Plains of Abraham ! TIavinor arrancred his forces, consisting of 4,500 men, he hastily moved forward to the attack. De Vaudreuil, the governor, advised, and even ordered, delay, until a hirger force could be collected, and De Rourgainville recalled from Cape Rouge, just above Quel>ec (whither he had been sent to watch the move- ments of a part of the British attacking force) ; but all in vain. Montcalm was impetuous ; and after rapidly cross- ing the St. Charles, he at once gave orders to advance, without even waiting to rest, or taking time to form in proper order of battle. Wolfe quietly waited the fierce Questions- Point out on the map tlie two hostile camps. After his first failure what did Wolfe do? How was the new plan carried out? Give the particulars of the memorable ascent to the Plains of Abraham. How did Montcalm act when he received the news ? In what way did de Vaudreuil seek to moderate Montcalm's impetuosity ? 96 HISTORY OF CANADA. [Pabt II~1V69. onslaught, and gave his men orders not to lire until the French sol- diers were within forty or lifty yards. On the brave Frenchmen came, and as ihey neared Wolfe's tr(jops, the rat- tle of musketry, at a given signal, extended, as if by magic, along the whole of his lines. As the French wav- ered at the deadly dis- charge, Wolfe gave the order to charge. Al though already wound ed, he led on the grenadiers. He had scarcely gone more than a few paces before he was again struck, but this time he was mortally wounded."* Neivertheless, with a wild shout his men still pressed on, while he was silently carried to the rear, near a well. The charge upon the advancing line of French troops was decisive, though they were cheered and encouraged to stand firm by the voice and example of Montcalm, who had already been twice wounded. At length, the loud shouts '^ They run ! they run ! " fell on the ear of the heroic Wolfe, and roused for a moment to consciousness the dying hero. " Who, — who run ? " said he. "The enemy, sir; they give way everywhere," was the eager response. Then gasping a hurried message for Col. Burton, he turned on his side and said, " Now God Wolfe's Ravine. {Half way up the Heights. * A sergeant whom Wolfe had reduced to the ranks for his cruelty to a soldier, and who had deserted to the French, is said to have aimed one of the fatal bullets at the hero. Braddock shared a similar fate ; see page xo. Qhestions. Give the particulars of this memorable battle. How wa» Wolfe wounded ? Mention the particulars of Wolfe's last momenta. Chap. V— 1750.] SKETCli OF FRENCJII RULE. 9? be praised; I die in pence!" and instantly tlie lirave Wolfe expired. Montcalm himself with nol)le conrage restrained the retreatin<^ sohliers ; bnt, struck a third time, he fell from his horse mortally wounded, and was carried into the city. De Vaudreuil, on whom now ChjLP. V-1761.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 101 and on the 8th of September, 17 GO, was Higiied that memorable document by which the vvhoU^ of Canada was solemnly transferred from the French to the Hritish crown. Thus, after one hundred and fifty years of heroic struggle, with scant means of defence, against })owerful rival colonists and a rekiiitless Indian enemy. Lord AmherHt. ^|j(, fj,.y^ promoters of European civilization and enterprise in Canada were compelled to give place to a more aggressive race. 15ut they did so with honor. Little, however, did those think who were then the victors over a brave enemy in Canada, that, within twenty years after the French standard had ceased to float at Quebec, their own proud flag would be igno- miniously lowered at New York, as well as at every other fort and military post within the thirteen American col- onies. And little, too, did they think that soon they would be compelled to maintain at Quebec a military and commercial supremacy, which the vanquished French col- onists had so valiantly done during the preceding one hundred years. As a parting tribute to their unflinching valor and fidelity, the last defenders of Canada, ere return- ing to France, obtained from their conqueror^?, and left as a legacy to their countrymen, a guarantee for the free exercise of their religion, and for other privileges which were dear to a people about to be transferred from their own to the protection of a foreign flag.* 61. Transference of the French Posts at the West. — Af- ter the capitulation of Montreal was signed, Major Rod- * The brief mitttary details which are piven of the several campaignH in this Seven Years' War are taken chiefly from Precis of IFarn in Cana- da fi'om 1755 to 1814, by Sir James Caruiicliael Smyth, Bart, London, 1862. Questions.— How did the Lake Champhiin country pass out of the huids of the French in the campaign of 17B0 ? Give the particulars of the close of the French rule in Canada. W^hat was the victor's after-fate ? 102 HISTORY or CANADA. [Part II— 1763. • gers, with two liuiulrcd of liis trusty rangerH, was dirtict- imI, ji(!(!onling to pnivious jirr:iiig(unent to thut effect, to prociM'd wtistwjird, :iii(l to receive the final suhmitiHion of the out lying Kreneh posts at Detroit, St. .JoHej>h, Miehili- maeivinac, Ste. Marie, and Des I'uuns (Oicen 15ay), and to escort their commanders to (Quebec, liodgers proceed- ed on liis mission, and having delivered despatches to (jl(!neral IMonckfon, at Kort I'itt, soon reached PrebCju'- Isle (Erie, on Lake Erie). There his own party had been joined by some Indians and provincinls. Dividing the combined lorce into two partits, Kodgers and his de- tachment proceeded to Detroit in boats, while the remain- der went by land. After landing one evening, for the night, and befoio reaching Detroit, he was confronted by Pontiac,* an Ottawa chief, who demanded by what right lie had advanced tlnongh his territory with a hostile band. After mutual ( xplanations, Pontiac suffered him to pro- ceed on his mission ; but the chief evidently felt that in the fall of French jiuthorily at Quebec fell also that In- dian balance of power between the two great nations who were then contending for sujireniacy on this continent. *• 62. The frst Massacre at Wyonihif/. — Soon after the incor])oration of the Delawares with the Iroquois, the val- ley of the Wyoming was given to them as their hunting grounds. A Connecticut company set up a claim to the valley on the strength of the king's indefinite charter to ♦Pontiarwns a oelobrated c}no{ of llie OUnwa Iril.t- of IndiaiiP, who, rfmoviiijr from the valley of the great river of lliat name, sett letl near Michilimackiiiac. An ally of the Freneh. he reniHted the eflorts of the Fiifrlish to gain posHession of the French forts after the fall of Quebec in 1759-60. In June. 1763, lie matured a hold and eompreheneive plan for the extinction of Fngliph power, hy the pimullaneoue (ai>1nre of "»<' fx- tensive ehain of forts reaching from Lake IVlichigan to the Niagara- The plot failed, and Pontiac afterwards professed friendshij) for the Fnglit^h ; hut an Indian 8r>y having discovered, in p. P]teech, symptoms of treachery, stahbed him to the heart, and fled. Pontiac's loss was greatly deplored ; for he was a man of singular sagacity,' daring c( urage, and statesmanlike views. The county of Poiitiac, in Lower Canada, is called after this re- nowned chief. Questions.— What privileges were granted to the vanquished ? Men- tion the authority given for the military details. Give particulars of the transference of the Western French poste. What occurrence took place In June, 1763? CHAP. V-1761.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 103 Plymouth in 1620 (on which that of Connecticut was based), and of an unauthorized grant from some of the Iroquois. The company formed a settlement there, 1761. This greatly in itated the Iroquois, and they determined to destroy it. Jealous too of the Delawares, who had in 1662 taken a prominent part in making a treaty with the English, a party of Iroquois visite^l the valley, and having treacherously set fire to the house of a noted Delaware chief (who perished in the flames), they charged the out- rage upon the inhabitants. In revenge, the Delawares 8u Jobiupoa, tind witJi what, suQCew. HQyt . . was Mictilimackinac taken V . . Chap. V— ^2.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 105 camp, Capt. Balzell, with 200 men and twenty rangers, under Major RodgerR, Dalzell was a daring man, an4. on his arrival insisted upon making a night sortie ; but Pontiac, who had been apprised of his design, was pre- pared, and Dalzell fell into an ambuscade at a little stream two miles from the fort (since called Bloody Run). He and his party were routed. Rodgers and his rangers, however, covered their retreat ; but not until Dalzell and 70 of his men had fallen victims to their temerity. 06. Bouquet\ Relief of Fort Pitt. — Oii hearing that Fort Pitt (now Pittsburg, and formei-ly Fort du Quesne) was besieged by the Delawares, Ilurons and Shawanese, General Amherst despatched Colonel Bouquet from Phil- adelphia with 500 Highlanders to its relief. His march through the forest was a most memorable one ; and on his way he gladdened the hearts of the beleaguered posts at Forts Redfonl and Ligonier. As Bouquet advanced, the Indians Hed, determined, however, to annihilate him in passing through the defile at Bushy Run (a small stream ten miles from Fort Pitt), where they had laid an ambuscade for him. Bouquet's precautions were, how- ever, equal to the stealthy stratagem of his dusky foes. As his advance guard emerged from the pass, the terrible war-whoop of the savage resounded through the forest. Bouquet's men instantly formed, and nobly resisted the sudden assault of the hidden foe. For seven hours the battle waged, until night fell upon the combatants. At grey dawn the infuriated Indians renewed the attack ; but Bouquet, having posted some of his men in ambuscade, feigned a retreat. The Indians, not suspecting his strat- agem, rushed forward, only to be attacked with deadly effect on every side. They fled in consternation ; and Bouquet's heroic band, gathermg up their dead and wounded, marched in triumph to the relief of the besieged garrison. Questions.— What led to Pontiac's failure at Detroit ? Give particu- lars of Cuyler, Dalzell and Rogers' efforts to relieve tliat garrison. "What did General Amhei-at do there ? Give a sketch of Colonel Bouquet's lueittorablo march from Philadelphia to the relief of Fort Pitt, 106 HISTORY OF CANADA. [Pabt 11— 1763. 67. Effect of Bouquet's Victory — Johnson's Treaty.— By this victory, the disgrace of Braddock's defeat in the same neighborhood was wiped out, and the spell of Indian Invincibility in their own peculiar mode of forest warfare was broken. Pontiac himself, up at Detroit, felt the force of the blow ; and his hosts gradually melted away into the forests or sued for peace. The Senecas remained implacable for a time, and did much harm ; but Sir Wil- liam Johnson had, at length, the satisfaction to obtain a satisfactory treaty at Niagara in 1764, from the represen- tatives of all the principal tribes which occupied the ter- ritory lying between the St. Lawrence and the Upper Mississippi. By this treaty the Huron Indians ceded to the king the country lying on both sides of the Detroit strait, from Lake Erie to Lake Ste. Claire, and the Sen- ecas ceded a strip of land, four miles in width on either side of the Niagara river from Lake Ontario to Lako Erie, on condition that it should be for the king's garrison alone, and that it should never become private property. As a token of their regard, they gave all the islands on the river to Sir William Johnson, but Sir William ceded them to the king. So great was Sir William's influence among them, that the Caughnawaga Indians, — a Mohawk tribe from Sault St. Louis (Lachine), — had previously come to Sir William to complain of an alleged purchase of their land, under a patent from Louis XIV, which they had never acknowledged, and which General Gage, the English governor of Montreal, had declared to be invalid. Sir William espoused their cause, and sent them home contented with assurances of his interposition on their behalf. 68. Expedition ac/ninst the Westeim Indians. — In order to chastise the Delawares and the far-off tribes who had conspired with Pontiac, two expeditions were sent against them. One was entrusted to Col. Bradstreet, but he mis- QuESTioxs.— Where did Bouquet obtain a victory ? What was the effect of hiB victory ? What followed ? Mention the particulars of tb^ Indian treaty, y ^- Chap. V— 1763.] SKETCH OF FRENCH RULE. 107 managed it and was directed to return to Niagara. The other wa,s entrusted to Col. Bou(|uet, and nobly did he do his duty. With fifteen hundred men he cautiously thread- ed his Wfiy from Fort Pitt through the trackless wilder- ness into the very heart of Ohio (then the hunting grounds of the faithless Delawares and Shawanese). The remembrance of Bushy Run was still fresh in their mem- ories, and they hastened to send friendly messages to the avenging conqueror. Bouquet declined to treat with them, unless, as a preliminary condition, they would, within twelve days, deliver up to him every French and English prisoner in their hands — men, women and chil- dren — and furnish them with food, clothing and horses to convey them to Fort Pitt. So sternly did Bouque.t insist upon these conditions, that in a few days he received no less than two hundred captives, taken by the Indians from English and French settlements in Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York and elsewhere. With these now happy fugi- tives and fourteen hostages, Bouquet set out for Fort Pitt, where he arrived in November, 17G4. 69. The Treaty of Paris, 1763. — In the meantime, a treaty of peace between England, France, Spain and Por- tugal, was signed at Paris in February, 1763. By this treaty, France ceded to England the whole of her posses- sions in North America, with the exception of Louisiana and the small fishing islands of St. Pierre and Miquelon (off the coast of NeVfoundland), and leceived back Mar- tinique and Guadaloupe in the West Indies — England re- taining Grenada and the Grenadines — while Spain re- ceived back Cuba in exchange for Florida. 70. The French and English Colonial Systems con- trasted.— Mo^i of the French military officers and troops, as well as many of the chief inhabitants, returned to- France after the capitulation. Their return was encour- aged by the English, who were anxious thus quietly to Questions.— How did Sir William Johnson exert his influence among the Indians ? Give a sketch of Col. Boiiquet's famous expedition againslj the Western Indians, V 108 HISTORY OF CANADA. [PART 11-1763. rid themselves of a powerful sintagonistic element in the population of their newly acquired possession. They well knew, from the character of the political and social structure of the French and English Colonies, that the process of assimilation between the two races, so long ar- rayed in hostility to each other, would be very slow. 71. The System of Government in the French Colony. — Independently of the dissimilarity in national tastes and habits, the relations of the French Colony with the Imperial government were essentially different from those which connected a British colony with the mother coun- try. The French colony was a child of the State. Ev- erything in it of a civil nature was under official patron- age or political surveillance, while religious matters were subject *o vigorous ecclesiastical control. Two principal objects engrossed the attention of the French colonists — the extension of the peltry traffic, and the conversion of the Indian tribes. As a means of carrying out these two great projects, exploration and discovery formed a chief feature of French colonial life. 72. System of Government in the English Colony. — In the English colony, the government, on the contrary, was rather a civil and social bond, than an expression of the embodied will of the Imperial authorities. It interfered as little as possible in matters of trade, leaving them to develop themselves as fast and as freely as the enterprise of the trader and the circumstances of the colony Would admit. Hence, exploration and discovery within the colony formed but a subordinate part of the objects and pursuits of the English colonist. When, therefore, the rival colo- nists came into contact, it was rather in a struggle for en- larged boundaries for trade, or for influence over the In- dian tribes. The momentous struggle which led to the • separation of Canada from France, forever put an end ' to these struggles between the French and English colo- ' Questions.— Give the particulars of the treaty of Paris. How did it affect French officers? How did the English view their departure? , JVXention the contr^t betweeu the French and English colonial systems, t> LAP. V— 1774] SKETCH OF BRITISH RULE. lO^ lies for dominion over rival Indian tribes, and for the lonopoly of the fur-trade. It also brought to a close a n'otracted contest for commercial and national supremacy, fwagcd for nearly a century and a halt" between two of the foremost nations of Christendom. Tliat contest, although it was too often utterly selfish in its aims and purposes, nevertheless unconsciously developed in a wonderful de- ijree, even in both colonies, a spirit of enterprise and dis- covery which has scarcely had a parallel in later times, when steam and electricity have added, as it were, wings to man's locomotive and physical power. Questions.— How did these systems affect tlie French and Engligh colonists ? CHAPTER VI. British Rule, First Pkriod ; from the Conquest UNTIL THE Division of the Province of Quebec, 17G0-1792. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Estahlishment of English Colonial Government — Ameri- can Designs upon Canada — Changes in the Constitution. 1. British Rule Inaugurated. — It was after the treaty of peace, in 1763, that General Murray was appointed first Governor-General of the new British Province of Quebec, in place of Lord Amherst, who had hitherto act- ed as governor-in-chief. The boundaries of the new pro- QiTEs TIONS.— Name the principal subjects of chapter five. When did British rule in Canada commence? Who was its first governor? Give the names of its divisions. What system of government was then adopt- ed? Mention the population and state of Canada at this time. liO HISTORY OF CAKAbA. tPAttT ll-lt64. vince were contracted by the separation from it of New Brunswick, Labrador, &c. The old district-divisions of Quebec, Montreal, and Three Rivers were retained. Gen- eral Murray, with an executive council, governed the Quebec ; General Gage, the Montreal ; and Col. Burton, the Three Rivers District. Two other districts, the St. Maurice and the St. Francis, were shortly afterwards set apart. Justice was administered in each district ch'ofly by military or militia otHcers, subject to an appeal to the Governor. This system was not poi)ular, and only contin ned in operation for a short time, until a court of King's Bench and a court of Common Pleas were instituted. The laws and customs of France were, however, followed in 'matters affecting land. 2. State of Canada at this Time. — The poj)ulation of Canada at this time was about 80,000, including nearly 8,000 Indians. The country, however, had been ex- hausted by desolating wars, and agriculture and other peaceful arts languished. The failure of the French Government to pay its Canadian creditors the sums due to them, chiefly through the fraud, rapacity, and extrav- agance of the Intendant Bigot, involved many of these creditors in misery and ruin. 3. Amelioration in the system of Government discussed. — In 176G, Governor Murray was recalled, and Gen. (afterwards Sir Guy) Carleton appointed Governor-Gen- eral.* In August of that year, Governor Cai'leton and * Sir Guy Carleton (Lord Dorchester^ was anionjj the most eminent men ■who have governed Canada. He was born in I^^nsrland in 1725, entered the army and took a prominent part in the wiege and eapture of Qnebee, nnder • Wolfe, in 1759. He was. forliis aervioes, promoted to the rank of Briura- dier-General, and during the Governor-General's (Murray's) absence from Caijada in 17(57, he administered the government. Being in England in 1770, heaidedinthepassageof the Quebec Act of 1771. In 1774 he returned as Governor-General, and successfully resisted the attack of the Ameri- can^* upon Quebec in 177(5. In 177H he returned to England, and was knighted by the king. In 1782 he succeeded Sir Henry Clinton as Com- mander-in-chief of the royal forces in America. In 178(5 he was created Lord Dorchester for his distinguished services, and from that time until Questions.— Who succeeded governor Murray ? What ameliorations in the system of government were proposed ? Give a sketch of Lord Dorchester's career. Mention the steps which were taken to remove any cause of complaint' CtiAl*. Vl-lfC6.i SKEtCIi OP BRltlSlt ilttll. Ill Gov. Sir Henry Moore, of New York, met at Lake Champlain, each with a surveyor, to fix the boundary line between their respective provinces. The boundary stone set up in that year was replaced by an iron monu- ment at the time of the Ashbiirton Treaty, in 1842. During the interval. Major Irving was appointed Presi- dent of the Province pro tern. Much dissatisfaction was, however, felt because of the continued administi'ation of justice and civil affairs solely l)y military men, and many of the inhabitants left the province. Memorials and complaints on the subject were trimsmitted to England, and there referred to the law officers of the crown. No thing was done, however, except to direct the Gover- nor-General to issue a commission to incjuire into the truth of these comj)laints. Sir Guy went to England in 1770 to give testimony on Cynadian affairs, and did not return until 1774. In the meantime, M. Cramalie was ap- pointed Governor ad interim. The evidence taken before the commission was referred to three crown la yers, who did not report upon it until 1772-73. Two ^ ere in favor of the views entertained by the colonists, while the third was opposed to them. 4. The Quebec Act of 1774. — As the result of all these discussions, the British ministry resolved to submit to Parliament a conciliatory measure, which was finally passed, entitled a " Bill for reconstructing the government of the Province of Quebec." This bill provided, among other things, for the "free exercise" of the Roman Catholic religion ; for the establishment of a Legislative Council ; and for the introduction of the criminal law of 1796 (with the exception of two years) he remained in Canada as Gover- nor-General. He was thus connected with Canada for the long period of thirty-six years. During tliat time he acquired great distinction as a colonial governor hy his prudence, firmness, and sagacity- His concilia- tory manner towards the French Canadians and towards other parties won for him their love and respect; and when he retired from the govern- ment of Canada it was anxid the heartfelt regret of all classes of the people. He died in 1808, aged 83. y# «» QtTESTTONS.— What inquiries were set on foot? What was tlie result of these inquiries ? Mention the principal provisions of the Quebec act of 1774. Was the Quebec act satisfactory ? il2 HISTOUY OF CANAOA. • ti»AR>t" 11-1774. England into the province ; but it declared " that in all matters of controversy, relative to property and civil rights, resort should be hud to tiie laws of Canada as the rule for the decision of the same." Thus, the enjoyment of the religion, and protection under the civil laws, of French Canada were coiiHrmed to the inhabitants by Im- perial statute ; and a system of local self-government wa^ introduced. The act was distasteful to the British resi- dents, but it gave unniixtid satisfaction to the French Canadians ; and, at a time when the old English colonies were wavering in their attachment to the British crown, it confirmed the French Canadians in their allegiance to the king. 5. J^Jfforts of (he Disaffected Colonists to Detach the Canadians from England. — Most of the old English colo- nies in America had long possessed liberal royal charters, under which they enjoyed the right of almost unlimited self-government. The long continuance of this right, almost unquestioned by the Home Government, had, in many cases, fostered a spirit of ambitious resistance to the legitimate exercise of the power of the Sovereign and of the Imperial Parliament over the colonies, even when it was employed to modify or counteract the hasty or oppressive acts of the local governments. The spirit of opposition had much to do with, and even gave an un- due vehemence to, the resistance of the New England colonists to the ill-advised stamp and customs duties acts which were imposed upon the American colonies by the Imperial Parliament. This state of feeling ripened into open revolt against the Sovereign a few years afterwards. The stamp act was passed in 1765, but, owing to the vio- lent agitation which it caused, was repealed in 1766. The customs duties act was passed in 1767, but repealed in 1770, except so far as the duty on tea was concerned. In order to raise a revenue, the East India Company was Questions —What is said of the Engliali colonies in America? Give an account ol the state oi ill-feeling in New England at this time and of its evil effects upon the colony. What is said of the famous tea riot in Boston ? Chap. VI— 17741 SKETCH OP BRITISH RULE. 113 allowed, in 1773, to export tea to Boston. Oil its arrival there, a party, disguised as Indians (some of v horn were interested rivals of the East India Company), boarded the ships, seized the tea, and threw it into tlie harbor. The government therefore shut up the harbor, un' 11 thr Com- pany should be indemnified for its losses,* revoked the charter of Massachusetts, and sent troops under General Gage to enforce obedience. In 1774, tlie Assembly of Massachusetts, by circular, requested a meeting in Phila- delphia of representatives from all the colonies to concert measures of resistance. Each of the thirteen old colonies, except Georgia, sent delegare. Canada declined to take any part in the revolt ; and although one of the three addresses issued by the insurgent Congress was specially addressed to the Canadians,! they declined to repudiate their formiil allegiance to the liritish crown, especially as that same Congress had denounced the liberality to these very French Canadians of the Quebec Act of 1774, which they regarded as so great a boon. 6. American Hostile Attacks on Canada. — The aj)- peal from the insurgents having failed to secure the co- operating sympathy of the Canadians, Congress despatched a twofold expedition in 1775 to secure the British posts in Canada, and to develope the friendly feeling of the inhabi- tants. One army from Boston, under General Arnold, t * " The object of the motlier country in imposing a duty of t/ircc pence per pound on tea imported by the East India Company into America, while it was tweJve pence per pound in England, was mainly to break up the contraband trade of the (colonial merchants with Holland and lier possessions." * * * " Some of the merchants [of Boston] had become rich in the trafftc, and a considerable part of the large fortune which Hancock [president of the insurgent Congress] iidierited from liis uncle was thus acquired." * » * *' It was fit, then, that Hancock, who * * * was respondent in the Admiralty Courts, in suits of the Crown, to recover nearly half a million of dollars, * * * should be the first to affix his name to the [uj)«'nor. 4. The Principal Rirers are the St. Lawnmce, Sajjue- nay, St. Maurice, Ottawa and sonu; large tributaries ; the Richelieu, St. Francis, Batiscan, Ste. Anne, and Chau- diere. 5. The Inhnhifnnfs. — The first settlers in Lower Cana- da were chiefly I'roni (he central parts of France ; but in the P^astern Townshi))s, the inhabitants are principally of British origin, including descendants of the United Em- pire Loyalists. II. UPPER CANADA. Upper Canada is aliout THO miles in length, from son th-oast to north-west, and from '2(10 to .'JOO ii^oain width. 6. Noted For. — Upper Canada is noted for its great lakes ; for its agricultural products, fertile soil, and petro- leum-springs. 7. Boundaries. — Upper Canada, which presents the ap- pearance of a triangular peninsula, is bounded on the north and east by the Hudson l-Jay Territory aikl the riv- er Ottawa ; on the south and the south-east by Lake Su- perior, Georgian Bay, Lakes Ontario and Erie, and the river St. liawrence ; and on the west by the Western Indian Territories, Lakes Superior, Huron, and St. Clair, named by De la Salle (page r)4) Ste. Claire, and the riv- ers St. Clair and Detroit. 8. Physical Features. — The surface is gently undula- ting, rather than mountainous, and is diversified by rivers and lakes. The ridge of high land which enters the province at the Falls of Niagara, extends to Ham- ilton, and is continued to Owen Sound, thence along the peninsula to Cabot Plead, and through the Manitoulin Islands, Lake Huron. The Laurentian Hills run west- ward from the Thousand Islands (in the St. Lawrence Questions. — Name the principal rivers of Lower Canada? "Who first settled Lower Canada ? What is the length and breatdh of Upper Canada? Of what shape is it ? Trace its boundaries. Sketch its physical features. Part 11-1786.1 niSTORT or CANADA. 127 near the foot of Lake Ontario), and oxtend north of Lake Simcoe, forming the coast of Georgian Bay and Lake Huron. Tlie wat(^r-sheda of Upper Canada are not in general sliarp ridges, Init ratlier level, and often marshy surfaces, on which the streams interlock. A main water-shed sei)arates the waters of the Ottawa from those of the St. Lawrence and its lakes ; a minor one divides the streams flowing into Lake Simcoe, Georgian li.'iy, and Lake Huron, from those flowing into Lakes Erie and Ortario. 9. The Principal Lakes. — The magnificent lakes which form the southern and western boundaries of Upper Canada, contain nearly half the fresh water on the globe. Their total length is 1,08/5 miles, and, exclusive of Lake Michigan, they cover an area of upwards of 70,000 square miles. Names. Superior Huron and Geor- gian Bay •Ste. Claire Erie Ontario Length in Miles. Greatest Width in Milec ,'i05 160 280 20 240 180 190 m m Co Area in Kng. Sq. Miles, 32,00(> 25,000 ;j()0 9,500 6,000 Height in feet above Sea. Mean Deptli in Feet. 601 57.S 571 5(!0 2:il 900 700 20 100 500 10. The Principal Pivers in Upper Canada are the Ottawa and its tributaries ; the Spanish, the French, the Maganetawan, the Muskoka, and the Nottawasaga, falling into Georgian Bay ; the Saugeen and the Aux Sables, into Lake Huron, the Sydenham and the Thames into Lake St. Clair or Ste. Claire ; the Grand into Lake Erie, through the County of Haldimand ; the Trent and the Moira, into the Bay of Quinte, and the Niagara into Lake Ontario. 11. The Bonndary Pi vers between Upper Canada and the United States are the St. Clair, (being the contrac- QUESTIONS.— Mention tlie two eliief water-sheds in Upper Canada. What is said of tlie size, height above the sea, and depth of the great lakes? Give the names of the principal rivers and boundary rivers of Upper Canada. 128 SKETCH OF BUITISII RULE. [Pa liT 17-1792. tion of Lako Huron near Sarnia,*) the Detroit, the Nia- gara, and the St. Lawrence ; and between Upper and Lower Canada, the Ottawa. 12. The Inhabitants. — Uf)per Canada was chiefly settled by the United F^nipire Loyalists of America, and l)y em- igrants from the British Isles and other parts of Europe. CHAPTER IX. Sketch of British Rule, Second Period : from | THE Separation of the Provinces until the • Close of the War of 1811, i. e., from 1792 to 1814. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Parliamentary Government — Sla very — Politic al Progress — Tr«r 0/1812. I. lower 4ND UrPER CANADA. 1. Parliamentary Government inangnrated. — In .Tune, 1792, the first parliamentary elections were hold in Lower Canada; fifty members were returned. The Legislative Council, appointed by the Crown, consisted of fifteen members. On the 17th of December, the New Legisla- ture was opened by General Alured Clarke, the Lieuten- ant-Governor, in the absence of Lord Dorchester, who remained in P^ngland until 1793. Eight acts were pass- * Sarnia. wliere a settlement was formed in 1833, was so named by Sir John Colborne— after Sarnia, the ancient name of the Iwlaiid of Guernsey, of which Sir iJolin was formerly Lieutenant-Governor. Questions.— Who originally settled U. Canada ? Of what does Chapter XIV treat? Name the principal subjects of it. When were the first elec- tions held in L. Canada ? When and by whom was the Legislatm*e opened? iChap. 1X~1792.] HISTORY OF CANADA. 120 e«l by both houses, and the session termiiuited in May. During the second session five kills were pjissed. The 'revenue of Lowijr Canada this year was only $25,000. During the third session, that of 1795, accounts of the revenue and expenditure, which now reached $42,000, were first laid before the Legislature. Of t u; rcvemu;, Tip- per Canada was only entitled to one-eighth. Loi-d Dorches- ter continued in Canada until 171)G. I)uring his adminis- tration many useful acts were passed, and general pros- perity was enjoyed. Nevertheless symptoms of latent hostility between the French and liritish races in Liwer Canada were now and then apparent; while the remains of sympathy with the American revolutionary agitation of 1776 caused the legislature to })ass some string(Mit pre- cautionary measures. so as to ensure public tran(piiUity. 2. Settlement of Upper Canada. — As the western j)art of Canada was chiefly settled by UnitcMl Km pi re Loyalists (to whom the British GoverHment had liberally granted land and subsistence for two years), it was deemed advis- able to confer upon these settlers a form of govt^rnment, similar to that which they liad formally enjoyed. In the east, the seigniorial or feudal tenure of lands had pre- vailed since 1627 ; but in tjie west, that of free and com- mon soccage (freehold) was established. In 1788, Lord Dorchester divided what afterwards became Upper Cana- da into four districts, viz. : Lunenburg, Mecklenburg, Nas- sau, and Hesse. He had strongly opposed the division of the province into Upper and Lower Canada as unwise and impolitic ; but his objections were overruled by the Imperial Government, and the "• Constitutional Act of 1791 " was passed. In 1792, the Upper Canada Legisla- ture changed the names which had been given to the Dis- tricts by the Governor General, into Eastern, Midland, Home, and Western. These districts were afterwards divided, and their number increased ; but they were abol- ished in 1849. Questions.— What was done by it ? Describe the stat« of feeling in L. Canada. Why were stringent measures passed? What is said of the divi- iions of the Province ? 9 130 8KETCII or imrnsii kule. lpart ii-itw. 3. The first Upper Canada Parliament wa« opened at Newark (Niagara) on the 17th September, 1792, by Lieu- tenant Governor, Colonel J. G. Sinicoe.* The IIouho of Assembly conyisted of only sixteen members, and the Leg- islative Council of rfeven. Ei^ II. THE WAR OF 1812. 10. American Declaration of War in 1812. — In order to excite Congress to a prompt declaration of war against Great Britain, President Madison purchased from a Capt. Henry for $500,000, a series of confidential letters, which the captain had written (as a political speculation of his own) to Governor Craig's secretary in Canada, on the state of feeling in New England States against the pro- jected war. In the letters a wish on the part of these States to ally themselves with England was alleged. The President laid these letters before Congress, as evi- dence of the secret machinations of England against the *Sir George Prevost was born in New York in 1767— his father (a native of Geneva) being a British General tliore at that time. He distinguirilied himself in the West Indies in 1803. He was Governor of Dominica in 1805, and was created a baronet in that year for his bravery. He held the office of Lieutenant Governor of Nova Scotia in 1808, and of Canada dur- ing the war of 1812. He died in 1817, aged 50 years. t Cotliu'8 "Chronicle of tlie War of 1812." Montreal, John Lovell, 1864. Questions.- What visit was made to Canada while Sir George Prevost was governor? Give a sketch of his career. How did Lower Canada resiwnd to Sir Georg^Prevost's war policy ? By what means was Congress induced to declare war against England ? 134 SKETCH OF BRITISH RULE. [Pakt 11—1812. integrity of the Republic. They produced the desired re- sult ; and, under the authority of Congress, war was forth- with declared against England by the President on the 18tli June. Sir George Prevost set out at once to ex- amine and strengthen the frontier, and to rally the popu- lation in defence of the country. With a view to secure the active co-oj)eration of the Roman Catholic clergy, he agreed to the proposition of Bishop Plessis to restore to their church the right as well as the status which it had enjoyed in Lower Canada prior to the conquest. 11. Opening of the Campaign of 1812. — At this time Lower Canada contained an estimated population of 200,000, and Upper Canada, 80,000. The campaign opened inauspiciously for the Americans. Besides some minor captures, Captain Roberts (Commandant at the Isle The Island and Fort of MicWlimackinac (Mackinac). St. Joseph), by direction of General Sir Isaac Brock (then Lieutenant-Governor and Commander of the British forces in Upper Canada,) surprised and, on the 1 7th July, with great gallantry captured, Fort Michilimackinac, situ- ated on an island of that name, forty miles from St. Joseph, and lying in the straits between Lake Huron and Lake Questions.— Wliat steps were taken in Canada to meet the emergency ? Give the estimated population of tlie two Canadfis about the year 1812. How was the campaign opened ? Chap. IX— 1812.] HISTORY OF CANADA. 135 Michigan. Five days previously, the Americans, having collected an invading army at Detroit, had crossed over to Sandwich and advanced against Fort Maiden at Am- herstburgh. To compel them to retreat, the British com- mander despatched a small force across the Detroit river to Mongauga so as to intercept the American supplies from the southwards. This plan succeeded ; for on the 7th of August the Americans retreated to Detroit. In the meantime General Brock arrived, and on the 11th August crossed over to Springwell and advanced on Detroit. On the 16th, the American general, Hull, capitulated without firing a gun. Thirty-three pieces of cannon and 2,500 men fell into the hands of the British. Leaving a garrison at Detroit, General Brock returned to the Fort at Niagara. An armistice in the meantime prevented further hostilities until September.* 12. Battle of Queenston. — Early in October, 1812, an- other American invading army, under General Van Ran- selaer, having been collected opposite Queenston, on the Niagara frontier. General Brock pre- pared promptly and eifectually to repel it. On the 11th October, the American troops attempted to cross the Niagara river, but failed for want of boats. On the night of the 1 2th, however, they succeeded ; and on the morning of the 13th, General interior of Fort Missasauga, at Niagara. ♦ Sir James C. Smyth's Prdcis of the Wars in Canada ; London, 1862, Questions.— By what means were Detroit and Michilimackinac cap- tiired? Where are they Bituated ? Why were hostilities suspended? Give an account of Uie hattie of Queenston Heiglits. Who were in command of the British and American forces '.' What did Gen. Brock do? Name the fort showji above. 136 HISTORY OF CANADA. [Part 11—1812 Brock, who had hastened up from Niagara (not knowing that the Americans had already effected a landing above Queenston), directed the detach- ment which had been posted on the heights with a battery of two guns, to descend and support the force on the bank, which was en- deavoring near the village to dis- pute the landing of the main body of the invaders. The Americans, who had already landed above Queenston, at once took possession of the heights. Perceiving his mistake. General Brock endeavored to re-take the position which he had thus volun- tarily lost ; and, in ascending the hill to do so, he was unfortunately struck with a shot and killed, just as he had uttered the words, " Push on, brave York Volun- teers ! " A stone now marks the spot where he fell. His aide-de-camp, Colonel Macdonnell, while leading the volun- teers, was also shot down. The command then devolved on Gen. Sheaffe,"* who, coming from Niagara by a circuitous route, gallantly carried the heights, and compelled nearly 1,000 of the invaders to lay down their arms, many of whose comrades during the battle, were driven over the heights into the river. Upper Canada deeply mourned Sir Isaac Brock, and has twice honored his noble deeds by erecting a monument to his memory, t Brock's Monument ; also a Cenotaph marking the spot on which he fell. ♦General Sir Roger H. Sheaffe was born in Boston, Massachusetts, in 1703. He entered the army in 1778, and served in Ireland, Holland, and Canada. For his eminent services at Queenston Heights 1k) was created a Baronet, He died in 1861, aged 88 year?. t The first monument, erected in 181&-G, was blown up by an insurgent during the rebellion troubles of 1837-8. The second was erected in 1859. QuKSTiONs.— Ho w and where did the Americn us invade Upper Canada ? What steps did Gen. Brock take to prevent them ? What mistake did Gen. Brock make ? How was it taken advantage of ? Who took com- mand on Gen. Brock's death ? Sketch his career. What is said of Brock'i mouujueut? CpXp. IX-1812.] SKETCH OP BRITISH RULE. 137 13. Close of the Campaign o/ 181 2. —In November, the Americans under General Smyth, in attempting to cross the Niagara river above the falls, were driven back with loss. 1" the same month, Gen. Dearborn pushed forward from Lake Champlain to Lacolle. Col. de Salaberry * went witii a force to meet him; but Dearborn retired after an encounter with a small picket-force under Col. McKay. The capture by the Am(3ricans of the Indian village of St. Regis (where the boundary-line touches the St. Lawrence), was counterbalanced by the taking of their fort at Salmon River, near St. Regis. At sea, however, the Americans were more successful. With large ships carrying more guns and men, they captured several British vessels ; but on land, the campaign of 1812 ended at all points in the discomfiture of the American invadiuij armies. 14. Reverses and Successes of the next Catnpaign. — In January, 1813, T the campaign was opened by a vic- tory gained by Col. Proctor over the American troops at Brownstown, near Detroit. In May and July he also attacked them, but with doubtful success. In April and May, York (Toronto) and Fort George (at Niagara) were taken by the Americans ; but Major McDonnell gained important advantages at Ogdensburgh, N. Y. At Stoney Creek, near Hamilton, the American Generals Chandler and Winder were captured in a successful night-sortie, on the Niagara Frontier. ♦Colonel Charles Michel de Salaberry, C. B., was bom at Eeanport near Quebec in 1778. He iirst served in tlie West Indies, and afterwards in ('anada. He defeated nnd drove back the American invadin,a: army at Chateanguay in 1813. For his servicos he was created a military com- mander of tiie Bath, and a medal was struck for his victory at Chateau- guay. QuKSTiONS. — Sketch the career of Col. do Salaberry. Give a sketch of the campaign of 1812. Point out eacli place marked on the map. What occurred at Niagara,j^c. ? 138 HISTORY OF CANADA. [Part II— 1813' 5th June, 1813, by Sir John Harvey,* and their invading army driven back. Mrs. James Secordf (her husband being wounded) walked twenty miles, to Beaver Dams, on the Niagara frontier, on the 24th June, 1813, to apprise Lieut. Fitzgibbon, the British officer, of an expedition sent against him. By skilfully arranging his scanty force of two hundred and fifty men, including Indians, Lieut. (afterwards Col.) Fitzgibbou captured, after a slight skirmish, five hun- dred troops, fifty cavalry and two field-pieces, under Col. Bccrstler. Lewiston, Buffalo, Forts Schlosser and Black Rock, on the Niasrara River, were also successfully attacked and burnt, by direc- tion of Sir Gordon Drum- mond,|in retaliation for the Tecumseh, a siiawanee Chiof.§ wanton destruction of New- *Sir John Harvey was born in England in 1778, and, having served for some time in the army, was sent out as deputy adjutant-general of the forces in Upper Canada. He served with great distinction tliere,andwa8 appointed Governor of Prince Edward Island in 1836 ; of New lirunswick in 18:'.7 ; of Newfoundlanth August, General Druniniond sought to retake Fort Erie, but failed. On the 17th September, the besieged made a sortie, but were driven back. The loss on each side was (500. Drum- mond's failure, however, was more than com])ensated by the capture of Prairie du Chion, and the gallant relief and defence of Fort Mackinac. But on Lake Cham- plain, the British forces suffered defeat ; though this dis- aster was soon retrieved by a decline of American naval power on Lake Erie, and the retirement of their army iVom Fort Erie on the 5th of November, 1814. The de- struction of this fort was the last act in the bloody drama, with the exception of the fatal battle of New Orleans, which was fought on the 8th of January, 1815, and at which the Americans were victorious. This closed the war. By the treaty which was signed at Ghent, on the 24th of December, 1814 (two weeks before the battle of New Orleans was fought), Forts Mackinac and Niagara were given up to the Americans, peace was finally re- stored to the Province, and our laws and institutions pre- served to us by the blessing of Providence and the bravery of our loyal defenders. ^-^ 20. Conditions of the Province at the Close of the War. — Although the war of 1812 lasted only three years, it left Upper and Lower Canada very much exhausted. It however, developed the patriotism and loyalty of the peo- ple in the two Provinces in a high degree, and proved how nobly the loyal militia of Canada maintained their country's freedom ; for at the close of the war no inva- der's foot rested within our borders. Party spirit was hushed ; and political parties of all shades united in a firm determination to uphold the honor of the country's flag. Questions.— What is said of the battle of Luiidy's Lane or Bridge- water ? Give a sketch of the close of the war. Mention the final acts of the contest. What is said of the treaty and of the close of the war ? 144 HISTOKY OF CANADA. [rAHT 11-18U. CHAPTER X. Sketch of British "Rule, Second Period (continued): FROM THE CLOSE OF THE War OF 1812-14, UNTIL THE Union of the Provinces. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Governors — Contest between the Government and the Houses of Assembly in Upper and Lower Canada — Canal Policy — Crisis of 1837 — Lord Durham's Mission. ^ . 1. Governors of Upper Canada. — During the years 1805-1815, there had been frequent changes of gover- nors. The Hon. Francis Gore held office from 1806 un- til 1811, when he was succeeded as President by Sir Isaac Brock, who fell at Queenston Heights in October, 1812. Sir R. H. Sheaffe held the office pro tern., as President, when he was succeeded by Baron de Rottenburgh, aho as President, in 1813. In that year. Sir Gordon Drum- mond was appointed Lieutenant-Governor, and he suc- ceeded Sir George Prevost as Administrator in Lower Canada, in 1815. During this same time. Sir George QuKSTiONS.— What is said of the military and militia force in Canada? "Who is commander-in-chief ? Mention some of the principal subjects of Chapter X. Who were the governors of Upper Canada from 1805 to 1812 ? CHAr. X-1814.1 SKETCH OF BRITISH RULE. 145 Murray, Hon. Francis Goro, and Sir F. P. Robinson, succeeded each other as Lieutenant-Governors of Upper Canada. The latler gentleman remained in office until 1817, when lion. Samuel Hunter was appointed Admin- istrator until tlie arrival of the new Governor, Sir Pere- grine Maitland,* in 1818. 2. Pulilicai Discussltms in Upper and Lower Canada^ 1810-22. — The distracting influences of the war having gradually ceased, .political discussions soon occupied pub- lic atienlion. In Lower Canada, a protracted contest arose between the Legislative Assembly and the Execu- tive Government, on the subject of the finances. The Assembly maintained that the right to fix and control the public expenditure was inherent in itself, while the Gov- ernor .and Legislative Council, being co-ordinate branches of the Legislature, resij+ted this doctrine, and sought to vest it in tht^mselves. The chief object which the As- sembly had in view was, by (controlling the expenditure, to prevent or to reform certain abuses which had grown up in the administration of public affairs. It also wished to assert its own authority, as an independent branch of the Legislature, and to prevent the possibility of its be- ing reduced to an inferior position in the state. So tena- cious was the Assembly of its rights in this matter, that for years, almost all other questions were made subordi- nate to this vital one, or they were treated as only form- ing part of the general issue involved in it. Thus things *Sir Peregrine Maitland was born in England in 1777. Having distin- cuishecl liiius^^lf at Waterloo, he was appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Upper Canada in 1818 ; while his father-in-law, the Duke of Richmond, was u|>pointt'd Govornor-Clencral of Lower (^'anada. On the Duke's sad death from liydropliobia in 181!>, Sir F^eregrine administered the Govem- uusnt of [.owtir ( anadu nntil the appointment of the Earl ot Dalhousie as Govornor-(J<;n«'ral, tn lH2i». Sir Peregrine was appointed Lieutenant- Governor of :Nova Scotia iu 1828, and died in 1864, aged 77 years. QuESTioxs.— Mention the names and dates of the Governors of Upper Canada from 1813 to 1818- Give a sketch of Sir Peregrine Maitland. What was the state of political feeling in Lower Canada after the war of 1812 ? 10 146 HISTORY OF CANADA. [PART II— 1811. remained during the administrations of Sir John C. Sher- brooke,* the Duke of Richmond (who was unfortunately bitten by a fox and died of hydrophobia, while up the Ottawa river in 1819) and the Earl of Dalhousie.f In Upper Canada an almost similar contest arose between the same parties in the state ; while the abuses arising out of the system of land-grunting, the management of the Post Office Department, and the oligarchical power of the Family Compact (intermarried families of the chief government officials and their immediate adherents), were warmly discussed and denouuced. Nevertheless, progress was made in many important directions. Emigration was encouraged ; wild lands surveyed ; commercial inter- course with other colonies facilitated ; banking privileges extended; the system of public improvements (canals, roads, &c.) inaugurated ; steamboats were employed to navigate the inland waters ; education encouraged, and religious liberty asserted as the inherent right of all relig- ious denominations. 3. The Clergy Reserve Discussion in Upper and Lower Canada. — The lands reserved by the Imperial Act of 1791 for the support of a Pi^testant clergy in Can- ada, amounted to one-seventh of the province, or nearly 2,500,000 acres in Upper, but only about 1,000,000 acres in Lower Canada — n© reserves having been made in that province until 1796. The appropriation of these clergy reserves to the exclusive use of the Church of England * Sir John Coape Sherbrooke was born in Englaixl, and before coming to Canada had acquired some diwtinction as an ofticer in the East Indies and the Peninsula, and as Governor of Nova Scotia. He administered the Government of Lower Canada with flrmuess and tact from 1816 to 1818. He died in 1830. t George, Earl of Dalhousie, a genewil in the army, was born in Scot- land. He perved in Nova Scotia before coming as Governor-General to Canada. He arrived in IWO, and remained nine years. His administra- tion was energetic and Arm, He died in 1838. Questions.— What spirit did the L. C. House of Assembly exhibit ? How long did the state of feeling last ? Give a sketch of Sir John Sher- brooke and of the Earl of Dalhousie. What is stud of the Clergy Beservos ? Chap. X-t814.] SKETCH OF BRITISH RULE. 147 in Canada gave rise to most exciting and acrimonious political discussions (chiefly in Upper Canada), from 1817 until the final settlement of the question in 1854. In 1827, an ineffectual motion was first made in the Upper Canada House of Assembly, to alienate one-half of the clergy reserve lands to secular purposes. Up to this time, and for two years longer, these lands were entirely in the hands of the government, and no part of the moneys arising out of rents received for them had as yet been paid to any religious body * — except £427 to the Church of England in 1816. In 1819-20, a Church of England clergy corporation was created in each province to man- age these reserves — the corporation, however, was direct- ed to pay the proceeds of the sales of the reserves into the hands of the government, to be by it afterwards ap- propriated. The payments to the Church of England in Upper Canada recommenced in 1821, and continued until 1854 ; but none were made to any other religious body until later. In 1822, the Lower Canada House of As- sembly voted an address to the king, praying that the various Protestant bodies in Canada be pei-mitted to share in the reserves. In 1823, upon a petition from the Church of Scotland in Canada, an address was also adopt- ed by the Upper Canada House of Assembly, recommend- ing that a portion of the reserves be given to that church. The passage of these addresses was the signal for a gen- eral agitation of the question throughout the Provinces — the prevailing feeling being that the reserves should be divided among all the Protestant denominations. In 1826, a similar address was passed, with the additional recommendation that in case it be deemed inexpedient to divide the reserves among all denominations, they " be * The clergy reserve lands were invariably leased up to 1829, when por- tions cf them were flrst sold. The rents received for them were for many years insufficient to defray the expenses of surveying and management. Questions.— Mention the discussions which took place on the Clergy Reserve question. By whom were the lands originally held ? What pay- ments were made from the fund ? Mention what addresses were passed. 148 HISTORY OF CANADA. [Pabt 11—1823. applied to the purposes of education and the general im- provement of the Province." 4. Upper and Lower Canada from 1823—1828. — The public discussions in Lower Canada were chiefly directed against a project for the union of the two Provinces, which was proposed by the Imperial Government, ^he feeling of Upper and Lower Canada being against the measure, it was not persisted in. Notwithstanding the continuance of the demands of the Legislative Assemblies in either Province to control the finances, even to the " stopping of the supplies " (that is, refusing to sanction by vote the payment of moneys necessary to defray the current expenses of the Province), ])ublic improvements wei'e carried on with spirit. In Lower' Canada, large sums were voted by the Leij^islature for the continuation of the Cham- bly and Lachiiie canals ; and stock to tlie amount of $100,000 was taken by it in tlie Welland canal, of Upper Canada. In Upper Canada, the Welland canal (projected by the lion. William H. Merritt)* was also aided Hon. William H. Merritt. oy Parliament. The poli- tical discussions of the day were, however, characterized by much personality and bitter feeling. This was espe- * TUe Honorable William Hamilton Merritt was the son of a United Empire Loyalist. He served in tlie war of 1812, and projected the Wel- 'aiid Canal in 1818. Mr. Merritt was a member of the Legislature for many years ; President of tlie Executive Council in 1849 ; and Chief Com- missioner of Public Works in 1851. He died in 18C2, aged 69 years. QuKSTiONS.— Wliatwas the state of feeling, 1823-28? Did the political discussions aifect the public improvements ? Mention what was done in Upper and Lower C. on tb.:s subject. Chap. X-1823.] SKETCH OF BRITISH RULE. 149 cially so in regard to the press. In Lower Canada the edi- tor of the Quebec Spectator was twice arrested for libel ; while in Upper Canada, the editor of the Colonial A4- vocate had his office broken open, and his type thrown into Toronto bay. The perpetrators of this outrage were, however, compelled to pay heavy damages. f). Political Party Contests in Canada from 1829 to 183G. — In 1829, the Governors of Upper and Lower Canada were changed. Sir John Colborne* replaced Sir Peregrine Maitland, in Upper Canada, and Sir James Kemptt replaced Lord Dalhousie in Lower Canada. In the meantime, political questions were discussed with vehemence ; and to thoughtful men, public affairs seemed to be gradually approaching a crisis.. t The subjects of dispute were in reality few, although the phases of the protracted and ever-varying discussions were numerous, and unfortunately partook largely of personalities.* Few * Sir John Colborne was born in England in 1 777 ; entered the army in 1794. He served in Egypt and Sicily, and also in the Peninsula. He governed Upper Canada during a stormy period, but failed to restore harmony. On liis retirement from Upper Canada, in 1S3G, he was appoint- ed Conmiander-in-Chief of the forces in Canada, and remained until the suppression of the rebellion in 1839. He held the oltice of Governor- General for a short time, after Lord Gosford's recall. He was created Baron, Lord Seaton, in 1840, and a Field-Marshal of the Empire in 1860. He died in 1863, aged 86 years. t Gen. Sir James Kempt was born in Scotland, in 1765. He served with distinction in Holland, Egypt and Spain, and in 1807 was appointed Quarter-Master General for IBritish North America. He was wounded at Waterloo. He was Governor of Nova Scotia from 1820 to 1828, when he was transferred as Governor-General to Lower Canada, where he remain- ed until 1830. He died in 1855, aged 90 years. tTo enter into all the details of the political contests of those stormy times, long since" settled, would be but to recapitulate the nunlerous points of dispute between the two great political parties. This would be foreign both to tlie scope and objects of this histoiy. The utmost we can (io, is to glance briefly at the most striking features of public affairs or events of moment, and to ian until ele- vated to the Bench, wa^ a native of I.ower Canada, and died in 1840. t The Earl of Gosford was appointed Govornor-neiieral of Canada, in 1836, in place of Lord Aylmer. He sought to conciliate opitosin;? parties in Lower Canada, and to remove causes of complaint : but liaviufj failed in his mission he was relieved in the jjovernment by Sir John Colborne, and returned to England in 1838. He died in 1849 Questions. Give the principal points of the famous 02 resohitions. How were these resolutions viewed by the two parties ; and in England? Skotoh Hon. £lz«ar B«dard ; Hon. A. N. Morin ; and theEa ' of Gosford. Chap. X— 1820.1 sketch of brtttsh rulk. 153 gradually detached from the more extreme opposition. This opposition was led by Iloii. L. J. Pupineau, in Lower Canada, and by Mr. W. L. Mackenzie,* in Upper Canada. 12. The Fatal Crisis Approaching. — The proceedings of the British Parliament, as arbiter between the contending parties, left the ultra oppositionists no resource but either to recede from their untenable position, or to carry out their threats of armed resistance. In order to avoid any appearance of coercion, no troops were sent out from Brit- ain ; but, in case of need, draughts were directed to be made on the garrisons of the adjoining provinces. Mean- while the spirit of resistance, which had been so fiercely aroused, took active shape : a secret enrolment of the dis- affected was made, and the plans of their leaders in Upper and Lower Canada matured. Inflammatory appeals were made to the disaffected of their chiefs, and counter appeals were made to the people by the clergy, and by the leaders of the loyal population. The Governors also issued proclamations of warning. * William Lyon Mackenzie, Esq., was bom in Scotland in 1795, and came to Canada in 1K20. In 1824 he published the liist number of the Colmial Aflvornfc at Niagara. Soon afterwards the paper was rtunoyed to Toronto; and, in 1826, having given offence to the ruling party, the ^ office of the paper was broken open and th.; types tluown into the Bay. f Mr. Mackenzie recovered sufficient damages to enable him to continue to publish liis paper until 1836. In 1H28 ho was returned foi- the farst time to the Provincial Parliament lor the County ot York. Having used some was'sevV'indv "conde^ b"v the Hoine Government. In the meantime .• Mr. Mackenzie went to England to represent the giKivanccs ot upper Can- ada, and u as well received by the Colonial Secretary, who requested him to remain to give information. In 18,% he was elected the hrst Mayor or Toronto. In 1837 he became the leader of the armed insurgents agamsc the Government. Having failed, he went to Navy Island, thence to tne United States ; and did not return until 1850, when he was again eiectea to the House of Assembly. He held a seat there until 1858, when ne re- signed. Though Mr. Mackenzie lived to regret his connection with tne rebellion of 1837, he was nevertheless a sincere and honest man m tne ex- pression of his views. He died in 1861, much regretted, aged 66 years- QUE.STTOXS. What unlooked-for act did Sir John Colborne perform ? Give a Sketch of Mr. W. L. Mackenzie. What was the effect in Lower •Canada of the discussion on the Canada question in England? Whatstepp were taken by the disaffected ? 154 HISTORY OF CANADA. fPART II-IMT. 13. The Rehellion in Lower Canada. — Before any hos- tile blow was actually struck, Lord Gc-sford retired from Lower Canada, and Sir John Colborne from Upper Can- ada. Sir John was replaced by Sir F. B. Head, and was on his way to England, when he was appointed Comman- der-in-Chief of the forces in Canada, and Administrator of the government in Lower Canada. He at once armed the volunteers there ; while Sir F. B. Head sent to him all the troops he had, and then appealed to the loyalty of the people of Upper Canada for support. At length, on the 7th of November, the first fatal blow was struck. The " Sons of Liberty " attacked the " Doric " volunteers in the streets of Montreal, and compelled them to give way. Both parties now flew to arms in Montreal and its neigh- borhood ; and during the month a series of skirmishes or fights took place between the opposing parties at Cham- bly, Longueuil, St. Denis, St. Charles, and Point Olivier. Martial law was at once proclaimed in Lower Canada ; and a Special Council, invested with Legislative power, convened. 14. Crisis in Upper Canada. — No collision had as yet taken place in Upper Canada ; but on the 4th of Decem- ber, 1837, some of Mackenzie's adherents, having prema- turely assembled at Montgomery's Tavern on Yonge street (four miles from Toronto), resolved to attack the city. On the 5th a flag of truce was sent to parley with them, and to dissuade them from their n\3,d scheme ; another was sent on the 6th, refusing their demands ; and on the 7th, Sir Francis marched out against them with about 1,000 volunteers. Providentially the contest was short and de- cisive. Mackenzie, not having completed his plans, had to fight at a disadvantage. He vainly attempted to rally his men, and, at length, had to retreat up Yonge street, whence he afterwards fled to Buffalo. From this place he went to Navy Island (near Niagara Falls), where he col- QuESTiONS. What changes took place among the Governors? Who took command of the forces to Canada ? What did Sir F. B. Head do ? How was the first fatal blow struck ? Chap. X-1 838.] SKETCH OF imiTISH RULE. 155 lected quite a number of followers, under General Van Renaseluer. Ou the Canada side the insurgents were con- fronted by Colonel (afterwards Sir Allan) MacNab, at the head of about 2,500 militia.* Watching his oppor- tunity. Colonel MacNab sent a small force under Lieut. Drew, R. N., to cut out Mackenzie's supply steamer, the Caroline. This they did successfully, and, having set her on fire, .^ent her over the Falls. Shortly afterwards, ar- tillery was brought to bear upon the Island; and Van Rensselaer, finding his position dilRcult to maintain, re-- treated to the American mainland, where his forces soon dispersed. In the meantime, efforts were made along the Western frontier to invade the country from the United States, but, owing to the vigilance of the loyalists, they were unsuccessful. Lount and Matthews, wiio took part in the Toronto outbreak, were shortly afterwards tried and summarily executed. 15. Progress of the liefjellion — Lord Durham's Mis- sion. — In the meantime the Jiarl of Durham,! who had been appointed Governor-General, and Her Majesty's Lord High Commissioner, to inquire into the affairs of Canada, arrived. Sir Francis B. Head was succeeded by * The ironorable Sir Allan Napier MacNab was born at Niagara in 1798. He was an otlicer in the navy, and afterwards in the army, in the war of 1812. After th6 war, he became a prominent politician, and in 1829 was elected an M. P. P. He was twice Speaker of the House of Assembly and once Speaker of the Legislative Council of Canada. In 1837, he was ap- pointed military chief of the Upper Canada loyalists, in suppressing the insurrection. For his services he was knighted in 1838. He projected the Great Western Railway ; was appointed Premier of Canada in 1855, and created a Baronet of the United Kingdom in 1856. He died in 1862, aged 64 years* t The Right Honorable John George Lambton, Earl of Durham, was born in 1792. In 1813 he was elected to Parliament and was appointed Her Majesty's Lord High Commissioner to Canada, in May, 1838, to inquire into itd political grievances. His report upon the political state of the Provinces (which ultimately led to the union of the Canadas, and the in- troduction of parliamentary, or responsible, government into British America) was published in 1839. He died in 1840, aged 48. Questions.— Give an account of the collision between the loyalists and the insurgents in U. C, ? Give an account of the Navy Island affair ? Sketch Sir Allen MacNab's career ? Give a sketch of the Earl of Durham. 156 HISTORY OF CANADA. [Part 11—1838. Sir Georgo Arthur* as Li(Miteiiaiit-riov<'rii()r of Uppor Canada. Large rcint'orceiueiits wcro also sent to Can- ada, and the two proviiK^os put in a better state of de fence. Shortly after their arrival, Lord Durham, and the several eminent men who accompanied him, set about the objects of their mission. Valuable information was collected, witnesses examined, and iuipiiries instituted witli great vigor. A voluminous report on the state of the country was prepared as the result of these in(piii"ies, and laid before Her Majesty. Among other recom- mendations made by the P^arl, the union of the two Can- adas was urged as of paramount importance. A hostile censure, in the House of Lords, on Lord Durham's local administration of the government, however, brought his mission to an abrui)t termination, and he returned to England. Sir John Colborne (afterwards Lord Seaton) again became Administrator of the Govermnent in Lower Canada until the ai)pointment of the Right Hon. Charles Poulett Thomson (afterwards Lord Sydenham) as Gov- ernor-General. 16. Final Ef- forts of the In- sur gents. — Vari- ous hostile at- tempts were made, dm'ing the year 1838, to invade the Province. The most serious of these took place simultaneou sly in November, at Windmill Point, near Prescot. * Sir George Arthur wafi born in 1784. Having been governor of Hon- duras and of Van Dienian's Land (Ta8niai\ia), he was appointed 1 Jeu- tenant-Governor of Upper Canada at a critical time^ in 1838. The efforta made during ] administration against the rebellion were successful. Questions — What steps were taken t9 restore quiet? Give a sketch of Sir George Arthur. What was done by the ICarl of Durham ? Why did he so 80011 leave the country? What efforts were made by the insurgents ? fCllAl'. X— 18,mi 8KKTCII OF BRITISH RULE. 157 Napierville, in Lowor Canada,, and at the Windmill Point, Prescott, on the St. Lawrence, in Upper Can- ada. That at Napiervillo was j)n)inptly put down by- Sir John Colborne in person. At Prescott, thti insur- jrents, under Von Sehnltz, a relu;j;ee Pole, maintained themselves for tiirec; dnys in a stone wiii(hnill ; but they were at length defeated and captured. The win be -3 U m J? 1—4 rt t~i s .a H eS •1-1 u o 0) Questions. Who succeeded Lord pngin ? What is said of his adminis- tration ? For what was it noted? Mention the principal matters of public interest. What is said of the exhibition ? Chap. XI-1854.] SKETCH OF teRlTlStl RULE. 167 communication with the Red River Settlement. In 1 858 the decimal system of currency, with appropriate silver and copper coins, was introduced. In the same year the 100th Regiment was raised in Canada and sent to P^ngland, in addi- tion to large subscriptions and a Legislative grant of $80,- 000 towards the Patriotic (Crimean) Fund. In 1858 The Parliament Buildings at Ottawa, Ont. after repeated attempts to fix upon a permanent seat of gov- ernment for Canada, the Legislature requested the Queen to select a suitable site. Her Majesty accordingly fixed upon Ottawa ; and contracts were soon given out for the erection of the necessary public buildings there. In 1859-60, the statute law of Upper and Lower Canada was consolidated by able Commissioners appointed for that purpose. The handsome buildings for the University of Toronto and University College were also finished and occupied in 1858-60. The closing period of Sir Edmund's administration was rendered still more memo- rable by a visit to Canada and the other British North Questions. "What occurred from 1855-O0 ? What is said of the eventf Trhich occurred in 1858-60 ? Mention the most noted ones. 168 HISTORY OP CANADA. [^AllT It— ld6«. American provinces, of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales in 1860. The Prince met with an enthusiastic reception wherever he went ; and his presence, as the special representative of the Queen, evoked feelings of the warmest affection and loyalty for Her Majesty. While in Canada the Prince inaugurated the Victoria Railway Bridge, and laid the corner-stone of the Parlia- ment Buildings at Ottawa. The visit of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales was, in 1861, followed by a brief one from his brother, Prince Alfred. 7. Administration of Lord Monck. — On the retirement of Sir Edmund Head, Lord Viscount Monck was appointed to succeed him. The civil war between the Northern and Southern States of America, which commei)'*ed in 1861, had greatly deranged trade. At first, public sympathy in Canada was chiefly enlisted with the North in its contest with the South ; but the unwarrantable seizure of the British steamer Trent by » Federal admiral, and its justi- fication by his government, as well as the denunciation of England by American public speakers, and writers, first checked the current of sympathy in Canada for the North. As the war progressed, a feeling of respect for the Southern- ers grew up, on account of their heroic bravery, and the woHvierful skill and prowess of their leaders. Generals Lee, " Stonewall " Jackson, and Bouuregard, in so long resisting the Northern armies. The admiration for Southern bravery (although it did not weaken the efforts which were made both in England and in these provinces to maintain an attitudf3 of neutrality in the war), was still very much lessened by the attempts made by Southern agents in Canada to compromise her neutrality. To pre- vent the raids into the States on our borders by Southern- ers from Canada, volunteers were sent on active service to the frontier. The cowardly assassination of Mr. Lin- coln, the American President, at Ford's Theatre, in Questions.— How was th* Prince of Wales received, and what did he do? Who succeeded Sir E, Head ? Wliat is said of the American civil war and the fluctuations of the state of feeling in Canada iu regard to it ? How did the seizure of th« steamer Trent affect it ? I Chap. 5C1-18660 sketch of BfeiflilH rule. 160 Washington, on Good Friday night, 18G5, evoked heart- felt sympathy in all the British provinces. The day of his funeral was observed as a day of mourning throughout the whole of British America. In 1865, the civil code of Lower Canada (which was commenced in 180U) was com- pleted by Commissioners appointed for that purpose, and reduced to a statutory enactment. During the Fenian ex- citement in 1805-0, volunteers were again sent to the frontier to prevent the irruption into Canada of the mis- guided Fenians; and prompt measurers- were taken by the governments of the various Provinces to meet the emer- gency should the Fenians venture to desecrate their free soil. About 20,000 volunteers were in a few davs en- rolled for active service in the Provinces, and nobly did they respond to the call of duty. 8. Confederation. — In 1804, the feeling of antagonism in Parliament between Upper and Lower Canada came to a crisis. In the successive elections which had been held during the preceding years, it was found that the hostile majority from either Province in the legislature was in- creased rather than diminished. A project of confedera- tion, designed to embrace the whole of the provinces of North America, was, therefore, set on foot. By thiss scheme it was proposed to leave to each Province the man- agement of its own local affairs ; while to a general gov- ernment it was designed to leave matters common to all. This project at length took effect, and an Intercolonial Railway, connecting Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia, directly with the ocean, was constructed so as to give to these Provinces a winter outlet for their commerce. By degrees, this principle of confederation has been applied to all of the British North American Prov- inces, except Newfoundland, and a great impetus has been given to internal trade and foreign commerce, and a new era of social and political prosperity has dawned upon these colonies. Questions. What i» said of neutrality ; of Mr. Lincoln ; of the volun- teers and of Confederation ? What were the leading features of the pro- posed confederation ? What provinces are connected by the Intercolonial Bailway ? What ar« the results of these changes ? x-f 170 HISTORY OF CANADA. [PART II-186fl. 9. In ISCO, the seat of government was removed to Ottawa, and the new Parliament hniUlings were oeeupied. The year 1808 lias a sad memory in Canada for the das- tardly mnrd(u% in Ottawa, by Whalen, of the talented and patriotic lion. T\ I). MeGee. llis loss was nniversally de])lored. In IKOO, the Northwest Territory (inelnding Manitoba, etc.) was transferred to Canada by the Hudson Bay Company for "31,,'iOO,()00. In that year the Inter- colonial Railway route was decided u])on. A great im- petus was also given to local projects, and the free grant lands were thrown open for settlement. IJefore the year closed Prince Arthur vJsited the New Dominion. 1870 was memorable for a series of great fires in Quebec, !New Brunswick, and the woods of Ontario. Postage on letters to li^ngland was this year reduced one-half. In 1871, British Columbia, and in 1<"^73, Prince Edward Island, were incorporated with the Dominion. As in 1841, when the union of Upper and Lower Canada was consummated, so now (1870), when all the Provinces, except Newfound- land, have been admitted into the Confederacy, it is hoped our public men will feel that, as the Dominion of Canada is now a great Confederation, their policy and acts must be dictated by a higher and more dignified national stan- dard than that which has yet been attained in any of the Provinces separately. 10. There have been several matters of public interest which have occurred in the Dominion and its various provinces since Confederation. The principal ones were the settlement, in 1871-73, of the Southern cruiser Ala- bama claims, and the "Fishery (Question," between Great Britain and the United States, by a British and American Joint-High Commission, of which Sir John A. Macdonald, then Premier, was a member, on behalf of Canada. The Conferences of this commission resulted in the adoption of the Washington Treaty, the main provisions of which were Questions.— What political project has been set on foot in Canada? Explain it. Wliat is this sheme designed to accomplish ? How Is it ex- pected to influence public prosperity, and the conduct of our public men ? Chap. XI-1872.] SKETCH OF BRITISH RULE. 171 (1.) to submit the Alabama chiinis to arbitrators, to meet at Geneva, Switzerland ; (2.) to submit the fishery clauses to the Canadian Common Parliament ; (.'J.) to refer the settlement of the San Juan Island and Ilaro Strait (Brit- isli Columbia) boundary disput(i to the Emptiror of Ger- many ; (4.) to fix the boundary between liritish Colum- bia and Alaska (U. S.). Un00,000 to the United States, and agreed tliat a connnission should sit at Wash- ington to consider individual claims ; {\\v Kniperor of Ger- many also decided that San tluan Island belonged to the United States ; and the fishery clauses were concurred in by the Canadian Parliament. The census of the Dominion as then constituted was taken in 1871. The following werci the iK)j)ulatiou re- turns: Ontario, 1,020,851; Quebec, 1,1 91,. Ol 6 ; Nova Scotia, y87,800; and New Brunswick, 285,594. To- ' tal, 3,485,701. In 1870, the Rev. Dr. Ryerson retired on full salary from the office of Chief Superintendent of Education, Ontario. His great success as the foun- der and administrator of the Ontario System of Education has been the theme of universal com- mendation. He has been succeeded by the Hon. Adam Crooks, LL.D., Q.C., the first Minister of Education with a seat in the Cabinet. Dr. Ryerson. (F«r names of Governors of Canada, see Appendix.) QuKSTiONS. — What important questions were decided in 1871—3 ? Name the principal points of the Washington treaty. Give the items of the last Dominion census. What is said of the Rev. Dr. Ryerson ? 172 HISTORY OP CANADA. [Part 111. Part III. CHAPTER XII. Sketch of the Municipal System op Ontario AND QUKHEC. The Municipal Tnstituti(ms. 1. Early Municipal Institutions. — Municipal corpora- tions were first created in Knglancl, by royal charter, aa early as 1100. They were, however, only granted as special favors to particular cities and towns, and were then made subject to a variety ol' tests, oaths, and condi- tions, which were not done away with until 1828. Nor was it until 18.'jr> that a general law was passed regulat- ing the municipal system of England. A similar law for Ireland was not passed until 1840. Up to that time, there was no municipal system in Canada. Special Acts were passed for incorporating the cities and larger towns, but the rural parts of the country were left destitute of local representative bodies. To the Quarter Sessions, or Boards of Commissioners, was entrusted the management of purely local affairs, while Parliament reserved to it- self the care of the roads and bridges, canals, and other important public works. 2. Introduction of the Municipal System. — Immediate- ly after the union of the Provinces, in 1840, an Act was passed by the united Legislature, establishing elective Municipal Councils in townships, counties, towns, and cit- ies in Ontario, and in 1847 a similar Act was passed for Quebec, while in the larger villages elective Boards of Police were established. To these bodies were entrusted the general management of all local affairs, the care Questions. To what does Chap, xxi relate? What is said of the municipal institutions ? When were municipal institutions first in Upper and Lower Canada ? '^"'•' Chap. XII.] THE MUNICIPAL SYSTEM. 173 of the public highways and bridges, the licensing of taverns, the regulation of markctH, the maintenance of jails, &c., with power to asHCss and coileia rates to defray all municipal expcaises. In \H.^,^), the niuni(ripal Hystem in Ontario and Qu<4)ec was greatly exten«ied ann the settlement of Fort Royal and Ste. Croix. By what name was the Bay of Fundy known? CUAV. XXVin.] HISTORY OF AOADIE. 181 (which he named Cape Blanc.) A harbor full of shoals and sandbars, which they entered, he named Malibar, (but whicli in 1002 had received the name of Cap Cod from GosnoM, an En«rlish mariner). Here an ill-starred dispute with Indians and a failure of provisions, induced them to return to Ste. Croix. Tired of this place and having found no other suitable spot for settlement, de Monts determined to remove the whole colony to Port Royal, which he did without delay. Receiving disagree- able news from home, he left Dupont-Grav/i in charge of the colony with Champlain, and at once proceeded to France. 4. Vicissitudes of Port Royal. — Under the guidance of the celebrated Lescarbot,* and of Poutrincourt, who acted as governor, the colonists set about consolidating their little settlement. De Monts and Dupont-Grave shortly afterwards returned to France ; Poutrincourt and Cham- plain visited Ste. Croix, and coasted as far as Cape Cod ; while Lescarbot explored the coast mountains along the Bay of Fundy. Shortly afterwards a marauding party of Dutchmen from the New Netherlands, hearing, through a traitor colonist, of the stores of peltry at Acadie, sud- denly appeared, and rifled even the graves in search of beaver-skins. Scarcely had they recovered from this in- trusion, when the intrigues of the merchants of St. Malo so far succeeded as virtually to destroy the protection in the fur-traflic which the Rouen company had enjoyed. News soon arrived at Port Royal that the de Monts' charter had been rescinded, and that the company refused any longer to bear the groat expenses of the colony. There was, therefore, no alternative but to abandon it ; and much to the grief of Membertou (the venerable In- dian sagamore of Annapolis, who had been their fast ♦Mam Lescarbot was a French lawyer and poet, and a friend of Pou- trincourt. He was the autbor of a History of New France. Questions.— Wbere was the colony removed Xo, and who was left in charge? Who was Lescarbot? Mention the vi(. isitudes which tliese original colonies uudeiweut. 182 HISTORY OF ACADIE. [Pabt V. • friend since tlicir arrival), Poiitrin court, Champlain, Les- carlK)t, and the other colonists, quitted the settlement in 1607 and returned to France. Nothing daunted, how- ever, and with the help of some Dieppe traders, Poutrin- court collected a number of new colonists, and in 1610 re- turned to Port Royal. Here he found everything un- touched by the natives, as he had gained their confidence and regard. The violent death of Henri IV, shortly afterwards, and the religious dissensions about the colony which followed between the Huguenots and the Jesuits, brought it a second time to the verge of ruin. The Jesuits determined to found a colony of their own, and Peres IJiard and Masse left Paris for that purpose. They reached Port Royal in 1611. In 1612, du Thet, another Jesuit father, arrived, but returned soon after- wards. In 1613, La Saussage, a cavalier, Peres Quentin and du Thet reached Port Royal, and took on board the two Jesuit fathers there. Proceeding towards the river Pentagoet. (Penobscot), misty weather compelled La Saus- sage, the leader, to land at the island of Monts-Desert. Here the colony of St. Sauveur was formed. The Eng- lish, who claimed all this region, sent Capt. (Sir Samuel) Argall from Virginia to dispossess the French. This was soon done, as the colony was defenceless. Argall returned to Virginia, and, having shown to Sir Thomas Dale,* the goveriMH*, La Saussag«,''s commission, which disclosed the colonizing intentions of the French, Sir Thomas deter- mined to drive them out of Acadie. Three armed vessels under Argall, were sent against Port Royal in 1613. He soon took it, destroyed the settlement, and dispersed the colonists. Thus was Port Royal, after a tlireefold disas- ter, for the time totally destroyed ; and thus by virtue of Cabot's visit and discovery, and Gilbert's act of posses- • Sir Thomas Dale Bn('oee0. De la Tour (then engaged in the fur-trado in Hudson Hay), on C'harnizay's death, returned to Nova Scotlji in lGr>l,and shortly afterwards married Charnizay's widow. Charnizay 's sister also becpieathed ]w.r claim to de la Tour. On tht; strength of this triple title, young de la Tour claimed Nova Scotia as his right. 7. CromwelVs ExjK'dltion (ff/ainst Aradie. — Under these circumstances. Cardinal Mazaiin, who had no confi- dence in de la Tour, instigated a creditor of Charnizay, named La Borgne, to disj)ossess him anointed six members of -ouncil to aid him. Li 1752, Cornwallis returned to England, and was suc- ceeded by Governor Thomas Ilobson. In the followhiir year, nearly 1,500 Germans joined the colony, and set- tled in the county oi Lunenburg. 4. Old French War, — The great war of 1755-63, called the old French and fiidian war, v/hich ended in the ces- sion of Canada, originated chiefly in ^he territorial dis- putes between the French and English colonists on the banks of the Ohio to which we have referred (see page 77), but it was also doubtless hastened by the harsh treat- ment and unfeeling expulsion of the Acadians in the pre- vious year. 5. Expedition against Nova Scotia. — At the conference of British Governors held at Alexandria, Virginia, in April, 1755 (see page 80), one of the four expeditions planned was the reduction of Louisbourg by Governor Lawrence. In 1755 the first blow was struck in this memorable seven years' war. In May of that year, a Questions.— Give the particulars of the founding of Halifax, When and by whom was a settled government established in Nova Scotia ? What disputes led to the old French and Indian war ? 13 194 ttlSTORY OF NOVA SlCOtlA. LPAiiT V-lTST. force under Col. Winslow was (IcHpatclu'd from Boston to at- tack the French forts in thedis- jmted tierritory on the north sliore of tlie Bay of Fundy. Here lie was joined by Col. Monckton with regular troops and artillery. They soon invest- ed Fort Beau se jour, which was Fort Beau86jour. commanded by I)e Verger, cap- tured it, and changed its name to P^ort Cumberland. They also took a small fort on the Gaspereau. The fort on the St. John was abandoned and burnt. G. Expulsion of Acadians. — In the harassing disputes which arose between the French and English in regard to the boundaries of Nova Scotia, the Acadian French, although called neutrals, incited the Indians, and took part with them against the English colonists. They also assisted La Corne in his attack on Bay Verte in 1750. Fearing that they would aid their countrymen in invading Nova Scotia, Cols. Winslow and Monckton, on the 10th of September, 1755, collected the Acadian population at various points, on pretence of conferring with them, and then cruelly forced them, young and old, innocent and guilty, on board several ships, which conveyed them to New England, New York, Virginia, and Georgia. About 7,000 were thus exiled, and their lands and cattle were confiscated. Their places were chiefly filled by New England colonists. After the peace of 1763, many of the exiles returned to Nova Scotia, and settled in th^ interior. 7. Final Capture of Loiiishourg. — In 1756, an unsuc- cessful attempt was made against Louisbourg ; but in 1758, after a vigorous defence for two months, it was finally taken from the French, by a force of nearly 40,000 men, Questions.— Give an account of the expedition against Nova Scotia and the forts there. Give an account of the expulsion from Nova Scotia of th« French Acadians. ^> Chap. XVi-m9.] HISTOHY OF KOVA SCOTtA. 195 under Gens. Amherst, Wolfe, and Adminil Boscawen. Its fortifications were destroyed, and the inhabitants sent to France. 8. System of Govornment from the Conqiiesi, — The gov- ernment of Nova Scotia was, from its contjucst in 1713 until 1719, vestinl solely in the governor as commander-in- chief. In that year a council of twelve, appointed hy the crown, was associated with him in the administration of public affairs. In cases of emergency, the governor was recpiircd to place himself under the direction of tin; gov- ernor of Virufinia. Thus the w)vernor and conncil within th(;mselves excn-ciscd the thrcc^fold functions an iiTSTORY OF NOVA SCOTIA. fPABT V-l80d. was erooted to liis momory in Ilulifax. In the same month George II died; and a re-election of a House of UeprcHentatives iH'came neccissary. In July, 17(51, tlie new Lc^gislature met at Halifax ; and wliik^ it was in ses- sion, the Indians of the colony entered into a formal treaty of |)ea('(^ with the Governor, and their chief solcnnily huricd the hatchet in the presencie of the Governor and Legislature. In 17(»'J, Cape Hreton was annexed to Ts'ova Scotia, and in ITdf) it was formed into a county. In 1770, Princes Kdvvard Island was separated from the f,^overnment of Nova Scotia. In 177r)-7() nuuth sympathy was (expressed in some parts of Nova Scotia with the American revolutionists ; in conseipniuce of which, the members representiuijf the disalTected districts were not l)ermitte,. Chap. XVllI.J BISTORT OP NEW BRUNSWICK. 199 PART VI. " CHAPTER XVIII. ^\ , Province of New Brunswick. (So called from the German seat of the Koyal House of Bruuswick In Europe.) * Size, about the same as Bavaria, or equal to a square of 165 miles Geographical Introduction. 1. Noted For. — New Brunswick is noted for its nu- merous rivers, its fiue timber, and its extensive ship- building. 2. Position and Boundaries. — This Province (in shape an irregular square) lies south of the Gaspe peninsula, and is bounded on the north bv the l^av of Chaleurs and Lower Canada, on the east by the Gulf of St. Lawrence and Nova Scotia, on the south by the Bay of Fundy, and on the west by the State of Maine. 3. Physical Features. — The surface of New Brunswick is agreeably diversified with hill and dale, mountain, and valley, picturesque lakes and noble rivers. Its forests are well wooded, and the soil along the rivers and in the val- leys is rich and fertile. The fine bays are well adapted for commerce. Questions. From what place was New Brunswick named ? Mention ItB size ? For what is it noted ? Give its position »nd houudaries, !)©• I cribe its physical foq,turo», S^OO HISTORY OF NEW BRUNSWICK. PART V1--1784. History of New Brunswick, from its Discovert UNTIL ITS Separation from Nova Scotia, in 1784. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Discovery and Settlement — Indian and Intercolonial Wars — Separation from Nova Scotia. [NoTK. — As N»iw Brunswick formed a part of the French Province of Acadie, or tlie British Province of Nova Scotia for 250 years, from its discovery in lalU until its separation from Nova Scotia in 1784, its history is necessarily blende that date. Fvoin 1781 New Brunswick ha3 a separate history of its own, and as such we have given it in this chapter.] 1. Aboriginal Indians. — When Europeans first visited New Brunswick, three Algonquin nations occupied Acadie, then including New Brunswick and Maine, viz. : The Micmacs, or Souri(juois (salt-water men), who occupied the country from Gaspc Bay to the river Ste. Croix ; the Etchemins, or Malice tes (canoe-men), from the Ste. Croix to the Penobscot river ; and the Abnaquis, or Kannibas, whose huntinij-oTounds extended from the Penobscot to the Kennebec river. These three nations became after- wards more closely united, and were known by the French under the name of the " Nations Abnaquises." The Malicetes frequented the river St. John, while the Mic- macs kept to the sea-side. These Indians do not now number more than l,r)00. 2. Discovery. — Jacques Cartier made his first voyage to the New World in 15o4 ; and on the IDth of July entered a deep bay, which, from the intense heat he experienced there, he nan ed the " Baie des Chaleurs." He was pleased with the country, and exj>erienced kind treatment from the inhabitants. In 1G04, Do Monts was commis- QuESTioxs.— Mention the principal subjects of Chapter xviii. What is said in the note about the early history of New Brunswick? Give the names of the Indian tribes of the country, and say where they were jfoun^i Sketch the discovery of New JBrunswick, OhAP. XVIII— 1632.] HISTORY OF NEW BRUNSWICK. 201 sioned by Henry IV to make further discoveries ; and after visiting Port Rosignol (now Liverpool), Nova Scotia, he entered a bay which he named La Baie Fran- gaise, since known as the Bay of Fuudy. Coasting along this bay, with his companion, Poutrincourt, the latter se- lected a spot on a spacious basin for settlement, and named it Port Royal. De Monts hastened on, and, on the festi- val of St. John the Baptist (24th June), reached the grand river Ou-an-gou-dy, which he named St. John river. En- tering another river, he erected a fort; and from the cross-shaped configuration of the stream and its tributaries, he named it Ste. Croix. This was abandoned, in 1605, for Port Royal, which, for tliree years, flourished greatly, under the guidance of Poutrincourt and Lescarbot. (See Nova Scotia.) 3. Extent of Acadie. — At this time the entire country extending from New England to the Bay of Chaleurs, in- cluding the islands and peninsula, was called Acadie. The English claimed it by virtue of the discoveries of Cabot ; and the French from actual possession. The chief French settlements were Port Royal (Annapolis) and Ste. Croix, — ^which last was afterwards abandoned for Port Royal, as above. 4. Original Grants. — Tn 1021, James I of England granted to Sir W. Alexander, afterwards the Earl of Stirling, the whole of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island. With this grant he instituted the order of the Baronets of Nova Scotia, on condition that these baronets would colonize the countrv. In 1625, Charles I renewed the grant, and included in it the whole of the country from the St. Lawrence to California. 5. Disputes and Seizure. — Failing to gain possession himself. Sir William, in 1627, despatched Sir David Kertk and his brother forcibly to expel the French. They soon captured Port Royal, Ste. Croix, and Pem-a-quid, or Pen- ta-go-et (Penobscot). They also made a prisoner of Questions. When and by whom was Ste. Croix discovered and settled ? Mention the extent of Acadie. To whom was the original grant made ? WJiat clisput^s followed ? How were tUe claimsJ compromised ? 202 HISTORY OF NEW BRUNSWICK. [PAKT VI-1692. Claude de la Tour, to whom the French king had made a grant of a tract of country on the St. John. 6. Compromise of Claims. — In England, De la Tour and Lord Stirling agreed to compromise their claims, each to i^ceive a part. De la Tour was sent to Acadie to carry out this arrangement ; but De la Tour's son (Charles), who was in command of a French fort at Cape Sable (about 75 miles from Sable Island), refused to give it up to his father, who acted as the representative of the Eng- lish claimants ; but in 1632, Charles I ceded the whole country to Louis XIII, and granted Lord Stirling £10,000 (about $50,000) as indemnity. 7. Madame de la, Tour. — Charles de la Tour, son of Claude, erected a fort at Gensec, on the St. John River, after he had taken possession of his portion ; but his suc- cess excited the jealousy of the French Governor, Charles de Menou, Lord of Charnizay and d'Aulnay. In 1638, Louis XIII defined the territory of the disputants. Never- theless, the dispute continued ; and Charnizay, having re- ceived orders from Louis XIII in 1644 to arrest de la Tour, laid siege to his fort. De la Tour, aided by Gov- ernor Winthrop of Massachusetts, compelled Charnizay to raise the siege. Afterwards, in 1645, in the absence of Charles de la Tour, he again laid siege to Fort de la Tour, near the site of the present city of St. John. Madame de la Tour, an heroic lady, gallantly defended the Fort, and thrice repulsed him. Charnizay, mortified to find that he had been so long resisted by so small a force, had the barbarity to hang all the survivors, and even compelled this noble lady, with a halter round her neck, to witness their execution. Slie did not long survive the mental agony to which she had been thus exposed. Charnizay was in 1647 made Governor of the Colony, and died in 1650. 8. Indian inroads. — In 1639, French settlements were made on the Bay of Chaleurs ; and in 1672, on the river Questions. Wlio was Charles de la Tour ? What dispute had he with Charnizay ? Give an account of the lieroic conduct of Madame de la Too* iu the defence of the fort. What Indian coutesta look pl^ce V Chap. XVII1-1761.J HISTORY OF NEW BRUNSWICK. 203 Miramichi, and at other places on the eastern coast. The English colonists who settled in the colony after the suc- cessive conquests or partial conquests, suffered much from the Indians, and were involved in the contests between the Mohawks and the Micmacs. The Mohawks were vic- torious ; but in 1692, the Micmacs, under their chief, Ilalion, attacked tlie whites, burned their houses, and com- pelled them to fly. To allay this enmity, bounties were offered to such colonists as would marry Indian wives, — but this plan did not succeed. 9. Capture and Cession. — In 1652, Chas. de la Tour married Charnizay's widow, and succeeded to his estates, Le Borgne, a creditor of Charnizay, attacked de la Tour in St. John ; but Cromwell having directed Colonel Sedge- wick in 1654 to recover Nova Scotia from the French, he defeated de la Tour at St. John, and Le Borgne at Port Royal, and took the whole of Acadie. (See also History of Nova Scotia.) In 1667, the colony was again ceded to France, by Charles II. In 1690, Sir Wm. Phipps took Port Royal and other places. Villebon, the French gov- ernor, however, soon recaptured them ; and from Fort Villebon, or Natch wack (near the site of Fredericton), on the river St. John, the Indians were supplied with arms to attack the English colonies in New England. The peo- ple of Massachusetts retaliated ; and Col. Church took some posts in Acadie, and then returned to Boston. In 1696, the country was again ceded to France, by the Treaty of Ryswick. In 1704, Col. Church attacked St. John, Minas and two other posts, but failed. In 1704 another unsuccessful expedition, under Col. Marck, was sent against Acadie. In 1710, however. Gen. Nicholson captured Port Royal, the chief port in Nova Scotia, which he named Annapolis; and, in 1713, by the Treaty of Utrecht, the whole of Nova Scotia, including what is now New Brunswick, was ceded to Great Britain. In 1758 the first Parliament of the Colony met at Halifax. Questions.— Give a further account of Charnizay's dispute with de la Tour. How was it ended? Mention the provisions of the treaty of Ryswick. What expedition was undertaken ? What local ooutests tooH place V 204 HISTORY OF NEW BRUNSWICK. [PAET VI— 1783. 10. Local Contests, — From 1713 until 1763, contests with the Micmac Indians and attacks from the French, who endeavored to regain the country colonized by their countrymen, harassed the Pinglish settlements. But by the treaty of 1763, which followed the capture of Louis- bourg and Quebec, France renounced all claim to either Acadie or Canada. 11. Settlement and Early Piivations. — !». 1761, some settlers in the county of Essex, Massachuse< ts, obtained a grant of an area of country aboui twelve miles square on the St. John river. Next year they left Essex, and, after some delay, settled at Mangerville, in Sunbury ; others settled near Carlo w, at the head of the Bay of Fundy. Justices of the peace were appointed for the first time, and a court held there. In 1764, emigration from Great Britain flowed into New Brunswick ; and during the American revolution many settlers came in from the ad- joining colonies. William Davidson, from Scotland, formed a settlement at Miramichi, which in 1777 was nearly destroyed by the Indians, who had declared in favor of the American revolutionists. Privateers also « pillaged the settlement. In 1783, peace was proclaimed ; and great numbers of the disbanded troops and of the United Empire Loyalists settled in New Brunswick. The loyalists had to seek shelter in log and bark huts ; and had, for a length of time, to suffer more than the usual hardships and privations incident to a settler's life in the wilderness. For the first year the British government liberally supplied these devoted loyalists with provisions, clothing, and some farming implements. Questions. What is said of settlements and early privations ? What settlements were made in New Brunswick ? Wliere did the colouibts come from? Give au account of the U. E •l->V, 't... v.. , t)ttAt>. XlX-1785.] HISTOny OF NEW feUUNsWlCK. ^05 CHAPTER XIX. New Brunswick, from its Skpa ration from Nova ;v ■' Scotia in 1784, until 18(;G. Principal Subjects of this Chapter I Civil Government Estuhlislied — Fires — Ashhurton Treaty — Responsible (' wernment. 1. A Separate Province. — In 1784-5, New Brunswick (then the county of Sunbury) was detached from Nova Scotia and became a separate Province. A town was built at tlie mouth of the St. John (now the important commercial city of St. Jolin), and anotlier at St. Anne's Point, called Fredericton. This last place became the capital of the uew Province. Two military posts were established up the St. John, — one at Presqu'Isle, eighty miles from Fredericton, and the other at the Grand Falls, ^J a hundred and thirty-two miles from Fredericton. A f: constitution was also granted to New Brunswick by royal ' charter, and Thomas Carleton, Esq., appointed governor. During his administration, of nearly twenty years, the ' country greatly prospered. From a rude, uncultivated wilderness, peopled chiefly by warlike Indians, he left it with many comfortable settlements, and with a regular Questions.— When did New Brunswick become a separate Province ? What towns were soon after built ? What place became the capital of the Province ? What is said of Gov. Carleton'a administration of affairs ? 20G ttlSTOUY OP NKW BRUNSWICK. [t»ART Vt-18I?. Grand Falls, on tlie St, John Elver. governmoTit and establislied local courts, tofifctlier with other evidences of permanent i>Towth and stability. After he had departed for Euirland, tlie ijovernment was admin- istered, until 1 r()|Krty to the amount of a million of dollars destroyed. $200,000 were collected in various places for the sufferers. In 18'} I, Sir Howard Douglas, who had successfully govcaiuMl the Province for fourteen years, retired, and was succeeded hy Sir Ar- chil)ald Campbell, in ISfJ-S. 3. Fire, in St. Ji>lni. — 1« 1837 a destructive fire visited the city of St. John, when 1 15 houses, and property to the value of $1,000,000, were destroyed. 4. Hevenae Surrendered. — In 1837, the revenues of the Province were surrendered to tin; local government on conaition that the payment of the salaries of certain civil officers, amounting to $r)8,000 per annum, should be granted to Her Majesty. In 1838, Sir Archibald Camj)- bell retired (the House of Assemldy having recjuested his recall) and Sir John Harvey was appointed in his place. 5. Ashburton Treaty, ^c. — In 1842, the Ashlmrton Treaty between Great Britain and the United States was negotiated by Lord Ashl)urton. l^y it the disputed boundary between Maine and New Brunswick was set- tled. This territory contained 12,000 square miles, or 7,770,000 acres. Maine received 4,500,000 acres, and New Brunswick 3,200,000. Before the boundary dis- pute was settled, grent discontent was felt by the inhabit- ants in the disputed territory, and collisions took place be- tween them, The boundarv-line between Canada and New Brunswick was afterwards peaceably settled. Reci- procity treaties and arrangements with the United States and Canada, and other provinces have since been effected. In 1845, commissioners were appointed to survey a rail- QuESTiONS.— Wliat calamities occurred ? Wliat revenue change waa U ' made in 1837. Mention the divisions made of tlie disputed territory under tlie Ashburton Treaty. What state of feeling existed on th© nubject ? 208 itlSTORY OF NEW imUNSWICK. [PARTVI-iSel Way route from Halifax to Quebec across New Bruns- wick, and in 1^^02-4 the project of tliis great intercolon- ial railway was again revived, and has since been carried into effect. G. liesponsihle Goveniment^ similar to that of Canada, was introduced in 1848. Since tlKni the Province has increased in wealth, population, and importance ; an7. From this circura- Btanctt it was called by Chaniplain (the founder of Que- bec), in his sketch of New France, Isle St. .Jean, or St. John, — a name which it retained until 1800. Verazzani is also supposed to have visited the island in l/>24, 5. Original Grant. — The Indians found on the island belonged to the Micmac and Abenaki tribes of Acadie and New England. They were laft in undisturbed pos- session of it for nearly two centuries after Cabot's visit ; although, with Cape Breton, the island had long been in- cluded in that part of the territory of New Franc;e called Acadie. At length, in 1GG3, with the Magdalen Islands, it was granted by the French king to Sieur Doublet, a French naval captain, for fishing purposes. In l71/>, two years after the Treaty of Utrecht, many French families removed to the island from Nova Scotia, and a few from Cape Breton. 6. Captures. — In 1745 Louisbourg, Cape Breton, was taken by the New Englandei s ; and they also laid claim to this island ; but it was restored to the French in 1748, by the treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. In 1758, it was again captured; and Col. Lord Rollo, with a detachment of troops, took possession of it, by Lord Amherst's direc- tions. Many of the French inhabitants, fearing expul- sion, left the island shortly afterwards. At length, by the treaty of 1763, it was, with Cape Breton, finally ceded to the British Crown, and attached to the govern- ment of Nova Scotia. 7. Survey and Settlement. — In 17G4-C, the island was surveyed by Capt. Holland. Lord Egmont's plan, among others, to erect it into feudal baronies, was not approved ; but, as advised by the Board of Trade and plantations, it was, by order of King George III, divided into towulands (or townships), of about 20,000 acres, and Questions. — When and to whom was the island originally granted? What noted captures were made on the island in 1745 and 1758? When and by whom was the island surveyed? What plan of settlement wa« adopted. Chap. XXI-1T73] HISTORY OF P. E. ISLAND. 211 in 1767 distributed, by Lord Wm. Cuni|)b(!ll, the erover- nor, hy lottery, among army and navy olHcers, and others who had claims upon the govcirnment, on certain pre- Bcribed conditions of settlement, and the payment of a quit-rent. Only a small portion of tiie island (0,000 acres) was reserved for the king, and 100 a(;i'(!s in each township for a minister, with .'JO acres for a school-master, besides a breadth of 500 feet rurniing along the coast for the purposes of free fishery. The settlement of the is- land progressed very slowly undia* this mortmain system. In 1875, however, an arrangement was made wluimby this anomalous system of lan«l temire in Prince Edward Island was exchanged for that effect(;d hy purchase. CHAPTER XX r. History of Princk Edward Island, from its Sepa- ration FROM Nova Scotia until the pre- sent TIME, 1770-18GG. \. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Constitution — Quif-Jients — /imnitpvifion — Political Pro- gress. 1. Separate Government. — Tin; i)roprictors having peti- tioned the King, and promised to bear part of the neces- sary expenses, llis Majesty, in 1770, erected St. .fohn (or Prince Edward) Island into a separate government, and appointed Walter Paterson, Esip, the first governor. 2. Constitutimi Granted. — In 1778, a constitution, similar to those of the other North American Provinces, was granted , and in that year the first meeting of the Questions. — Mention the principal subjects of clisipter xxi. "When was a constitution granted? Give a sketch of the government. 212 HiSTOttY OP P. E. ISLAND. Part VlI-1802. legislature took place. The government consisted of a Lieutenant-Governor, aided by a combined Executive and Legislative Council, and a house of Assembly of 18 members. Of the Executive Council, three were mem- bers of the Legislative Council, and one of the House of Assembly. This constitution was modified in 1861. 3. Washington and the Islanders. — In 1775, two Ameri- can cruisers, taking advantage of the defenceless state of the island, attacked and plundered Charlottetown, carry- ing off the acting governor and two other civil oilicers. The matter having been reported to General Washington, here})rimanded and dismissed the captains of the cruisers, restored the plundered property, and set the governor and his officers free, with many courteous ex})ressions of regret for their sufferings. 4. Duke of Kent and the Islanders. — The Duke of Kent (father to the Queen), who for ten years resided, at different times, at Halifax, as communder-in-chief, paid great attention to the stjite of its defences. lie had bat- teries erected for the protection of Charlottetown ; and organized the militia for the protection of the island dur- ing the revolutionary war. He returned to England in 1800 ; and, as a mark of esteem for their protector, the House of Assembly changed the name of the island from St. John to Prince Edward. 5. Quit- Rents Composition. — In 1797, the proportion of rents paid by the proprietors not being sufficient to de- fray the expenses of government, the British Parliament, upon the presentation of the House of Assembly, made an aimual grant for that purpose. In 1802, the arrears of quit-rents amounted to $800,000. To relieve the proprietors of this heavy burden, the Imperial govern- ment accepted a liberal composition for the debt. 6. Increased Immigration. — The effect of this generous step was at once perceptible in the increased prosperity Questions.— What is said of Wasliington and the islanders? How did the Dulce of Kent act ? Mention the financial changes made in 1797. Chap. XXI— 1837.] HISTORY OP P. E. ISLAND. 213 of the island. In 1803, the Earl of Selkirk (who after- wards colonized Red Hiver Settlement), took over 800 Highlanders : their numbers were afterwards increased to 4,000. 7. Progress of Events from 1770 to 1833. — Governor Patterson, being accused of impeding by monopoly the settlement and cultivation of \\\q island, was succeeded by Governor Fanning ; who during his nineteen years' ser- vice did little to promote the interests of the island. He was succeeded by Governor Desbarres, who was more . successful during his eight years' stay. A brother of Sir Sidney Smith became governor in 1813. His tyrannical conduct, however, in refusing to call the Legislature to- gether for four years, and in seeking the arrest of Mr. Stewart, who had bc^^n sent to England to represent the grievances of the colony to the king, caused so much agi- tation, that he was recalled in 1824, and Coloncd Keady appointed in his place. During his administration, a cen- - 8U8 of the inhabitants was taken, and the Uoman Catholic disabilities removed. By his excellent qunlilies he endear- ed himself to the inhabitants. lie was succeeded by Col. Young, who was appointed in 1830. During his adminis- tration the agitation for a separation of the Executive and Legislative Councils, and for responsible government com- menced. 8. Progress of Event's from 1834 to 1850. — Governor Young havintr died in 1837, was succeeded bv Sir John Harvey in 1836. Sir John, having been transferred to New Brunswick, was succeeded by Sir Charles Fitzroy in 1837. During his administration, the Legislative Council was remodelled. A separate Executive Council of nine members, was formed, and a Legislative Council of twelve appointed, exclusive of the Chief Justice, who retired from it. Sir Charles having been appointed to the West Indies, Sir H. V. Huntley succeeded him in 1841. Questions.— What is said of immigration ? Give a slietcli of the pro- gress of the principal events which took place from 1770 to 1833— and also from 1834 to 1850. Who were the island governors during those years ? 214 III8TORY OF P. E. ISLAND. [PART VII— 1860. In that year a census was taken. In 1842, education was greatly promoted. In 1837 the Colonial Building was commenced ; and in 1846 a geologictd survey of the island was made. Governor Huntley having retired, Sir Donald Campbell was appointed in 1847. In that year the House of Assembly passed an address to Her Majesty, praying for the introduction into the Province of Responsible Government. In 1848 a census was taken. Further con- tests took place with the Legislature on the subject of responsible government, in the midst of which Governor Campbell died, and was succeeded by Sir Alexander Ban- nerman in 1850. 9. Progress of Events from 1850 to 1864.— In 1851, during Governor Bannerman's administration, responsible government was fully introduced into the island. In 1852 an important Act establishing free education was passed. In 1853, an Act establishing universal suffrage was passed. Governor Bannerman having been removed to the Baha- mas, he was succeeded by Sir Dominick Daly (formerly Secretary of Canada) in 1854. In that year an Act was passed to give effect to Lord Elgin's Reciprocity Treaty with the United States. In the same year the members of the House of Assembly were increased from twenty- four to thirty members. In 1856 a Normal school was established. In 1857 an agitation commenced on the question (which was decided in the affirmative in 1860) of regulating the introduction of the Bible into common schools. Governor Daly having retired, he was succeed- ed by Governor Dundas in 1859. In 1860, the members of the Legislative Council were also increased from twelve to seventeen. Three acts were passed during this year for improving education in the island. The memorable visit of His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales also took place in 1860, and he was everywhere greeted with de- monstrations of joy. An important Commission was ap- QUESTioNS — What improvements were made in 1837 ? What was done in 1848 ? Who succeeded Governor Campbell ? Give a »ketcll of tlj« progress of events from i860 to 1866, [Chap. XXII. HISTORY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. ," 215 jf appointed this year to inquire into the state of the land r question with a view to suggest a fair and equitable mode ol converting the leaseholds into freeholds. In 1861, the Commissioners presented a minute and valuable report on the subject. General prosperity has since prevailed, and e^ try effort is now made to develope the physical re- sources of the island. In 1864, a meeting of delegates from each of the several British Provinces was held, at Charlottetown, to consider the expediency of uniting all the Provinces under one Confederation. Great unanimity on the subject prevailed. Subsequent meetings were held by the delegates at Halifax and Quebec in the same year. The island was admitted to the Dominion Confederation in 1873. For names of Governors of Prince Edward Island, see Appendix. Part VIII. CHAPTER XXII. The Province of Newfoundland. (So called from being the first land " found " in the New World by Sir eJohn Cabot.) Size, less than one-third that of Ontario, or equal to a sq. of 245 miles. Geographical Intboduction. 1. Noted For, — Newfoundland is noted for its fisheries, and for being the first British colony established in America. — ■-I »!.. , ■■ ■ ■ I. - ■ QUB8TION8.— What commission was appointed? To what does Part; VIII relate ? How did N«wiouudland receive its name ? 216 HISTORY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. [Part VIIL 2. Position. — This island is the largest iu the North Ame- rican seas, and lies at the entrance to ^^^ the Gulf of ^^"^^^ St. Lawrence It is triangu- lar in shape, and is about 1,200 m. in circumfer- ence. Its length is 400 m., its great- Appearance of Newfoundland from a Balloon. est width 300. 3. Physical Features. — The coast-line is pierced by manj fine bays and harbors. The surface is much diver- sified by numerous hills, rivers, lakes, mossy marshes, and barren rocky ridges, especially along the western coast. History of the Island of Newfoundland. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Indians — Discovery — Fisheries — Expedition — Settlement — -Government — Wars. 4. The Red Indians. — An Algonquin tribe, called Baeo- thic, or Bethuck, with some Esquimaux Indians, occupied the Island of Newfoundland vhen Sebastian Cabot first visited it. Their food then was raw flesh. They resided chiefly in the vicinity of the Exploits river, but are now extinct. They were ruthlessly exterminated by the Mic- OUKSTIONS. — Wliat is the nositlon and shape of Newfoundland ? Des- cribe its T»hvsical features. Mention the principal subjects of chap, xxxy. What is said of the Baeof ic, Esquimaux, and Micmac, ox RedJn^WVit Chap. XXII.] HISTORY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. 21 7 mac Indians and the Ti-liites, who waged perpetual war- fare against them. o Micmacs having painted their persons with the red ochre found in the island, received the name of the " Red Indians." Their mode of captur- ing deer was ingenious. Tliey cut down trees on either bank of a river, so as to form a brush fence, leaving openings at intervals, through which the deer must pass, in doing which these unsuspecting animals became an easy prey to the hunter. There are now very few Indians, if any, on the island. 5. Northern Discovery. — It is supposed that Newfound- land, or Ilelluland, was originally discovered by Biarne, son of Ileriulf Bardson, a follower of Eric the Red, Earl of Norway, who in the year 080, emigrated from Iceland to Greenland. Lcif, son of the Earl, is said to have made a second visit in the year 1000, and to have gone as far south as Vinland (Massachusetts), " a place of grapes." Thorwold, brother of Leif, reached Vinland in 1002, but returning home, fell in with the Skrelling, or Esquimaux Indians, and was killed. His brother Thor- stein sought to recover his body but failed. In 1004 Thorfinn, a person of illustrious lineage, is also said to have made a voyage to Ilelluland, Markland (Nova Sco- tia), and Vinland. These statements are disputed, but they are supported by various authorities. 6. Cabofs Discovery. — Columbus, having in vain ap- plied to King Henry VII of England to become the patron of his great enterprise, was compelled at length to seek the aid of th« King, and especially of the Queen, of Spain. After his famous discovery was known, Henry was chagrined at his own eupineness, and he then resolved to retrieve his error. He therefore, in May, 1497, des- patched John Cabot and his sons on a voyage of discove- ry to the west. On the 24th June they reached a point on the American coast, either Labrador, or more probably OuESTiONS.— Who first discovered Newfoundland in 986 ? Mention the discoveries of the Northmen. What led to Cabot's voyage ? Give an ftcoount of his discovery of Newfoundland, 218 HISTORY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. [PART Vlil.- Newfoundland, to which, as the land first seen, they gave the name of Prima Vista. Owing to the quantities of cod-fish on the coast, they called the place Bac-ca-la-os (which was the local, as well as the Breton name for cod- fish). (See page 23.) This name is still given to a small island off the northern point of the Avalon peninsula, which would seem to indicate the precise spot " first seen " by the Cabots. In the manuscript records of the pay- ments out of Henry Vll's " privy purse," preserved in the British Museum, is the interesting one of "£10," paid on the 10th of August, 1497, "to hym that found the New Isle." In 1498, Sebastian Cabot, who became a celebrated navigator, again visited the island, and sailed as far north as 1 ludson Bay. 7. GortereaVs Visit — First Fisheries. — In 1500,Gaspard Cortereal, a Portuguese, visited the island. He gave to Conception Bay and Portugal Cove the names they still bear. His account of the abundance of fish on the banks induced the Portuguese, in 1502, to establish the fisheries, which have since become so famous and productive. The French, Spaniards, and English soon followed, and in 1617 there were fifty vessels engaged in the enterprise. In 1578 this number had increased to 400. The Portu- guese soon after ceased to visit the coast, leaving the fish- eries chiefly in the hands of the French and the English. S.Verrazzcmi's Visit. — In 1523, John Verrazzani visited the island, and carefully examined 2,000 miles of the ad- jacent coast. Upon his examination and report, the French laid claim to the whole country, as forming part of New France. 9. Cartier^s Visit. — In 1534, Jacques Cartier went partially around the island of Newfoundland, onr his way to Canada, and so pleased was he with the scenery of the cape which he first saw, that he called it " Boua- vista," a name it still bears. Sailing northwards of New- QuESTioNS.— What places were visited ? Mention the historical re- cords of the discovery. Who followed Cabot ? What nations engaged in tb© fisheries ? Were otUer visits made to the islau(i. [A.P.XXII.J HISTORY OP NEWFOUNDLAND. 219 >undland, he passed through the Strait of Belle Isle into Ihe Gulf of St. Lawrence. 10. Gilbert^ s Expedition, — During the memorable reign of Queen Elizabeth, London, Bristol, and other English ports actively engaged in the Newfoundland fisheries. At this time the question of a north-west passage to India occupied public attention. Colonization, too, had its ar- dent promoters. Among the distinguished friends to this Scheme in England was Sir Walter Raleigh,* whose name is so memorable in the early history of the State of Virginia. With his half- brother, vSir Humphrey Gil- bert, he obtained a charter of colonization from the Queen. The first expedition which sailed met with disaster, and returned. Sir Walter was to have accompanied the second, but sickness in his ship pre- vented him. It sailed, how- ever, for Newfoundland, and in August, 1583, Sir Humphrey Gilbert landed, after a slight opposition, at St. Johns, and took formal possession of the island in the name of Queen Elizabeth. Collect- ing the masters, merchants, and artisans whom he had brought with him, he read his commission, and afterwards promulgated several laws On his return home, he was Sir VValt«r Raleigh. * Sir Walter Raloigh was bom in Devonshire in 1552. He was distin- guished as a courtier, soldier, diplomatist, literary man, and traveller. Ho was a favorite with Queen Elizabeth, who knighted him. After her death he was accused of high treason, and by the King's orders, oonfined in the Tower of London for fifteen years. Here he wrote " The History of the World" and other books. At length, 1616, he was released, and appointed to command an expedition to South America. Being unsuc- cessful, James I. cruelly had him executed under Ins old sentence. H©. is said to have introduced tobacco and potatoes into Europe . Questions.— Wliat led to Sir Humphrey Gilbert's expedition ? Give a sketch of Sir Walter Raleigh's career. Give an account of Sir H. Gilbert'ej ©xpeditiou. What did he do on his arrival in Newfoundland V 220 niSTOKY' OF NEWFOUNDLAND. [Paut VIII. unfortunately shipwrecked, and lost his life near the Azores. * In 1587 Martin Frobisher, tiie noted Arctic i ex})lorer, visited Labrador, and it is 8up[)osed Newfound- • land also. In 1585 Sir Francis Drake made a voyage to Newfoundland, and ca|)tured some Portuguese ships there, which were laden with fish, oil, and furs. 11. Guy* 8 expedition. — In 10 10, James I. granted to Lord Bacon and forty others, a patent to folonize the island. They sent John Guy, from Bristol, who established a colony at Conception Bay. lie undertook a survey of the coast, and held friendly intercourse with the Red Indians ; but after a while sickness compelled Guy and some of his party to give up the project and return to England. 1 2. Wliithoiirne's Admiralty Courts. — In HI 1 4, pei'manent dwelling-houses were first erected in Newfoundland ; and in 1615 Capt. Whitbourne was despatched to the island, by the Admiralty, to Irold courts, empanel juries, and settle fishery disputes. Whitbourne also, in 1G17, planted a Welsh colony at a place named Cambriol, now called Little Britain. 13. Baltimore's Colony. — In 1622, Sir George Calvert, afterwards Lord Baltimore, while Secretary of State, ob- tained letters patent from James I., granted to him the entire peninsula which is formed by the Bays of Placentia and Trinity. This extensive peninsula he erected into a province, and gave to it the name of Avalon — which was the ancient name of Glastonbury, where Christianity was first introduced into England. lie appointed Ca[)t. Wynne local governor, who fixed his residence at Ferryland. Lord Baltimore also resided there for some time ; but linding * The Btory of his death is a very touching one. lie had transferred his flag to the " Squirrel," a little vessel of only ten tons. As he neared the Azores, a violent storm arose, which enculphed his vesssol. When last Been by those on board his companion ship, ho was sitting on the deck with a book before him. His last words heard were, ** Cheer up, boys ; we are as near heaven by sea as by land I " Questions.— Mention the incident connected with Sir Humphrey Gil- bert's death. What is said of Guy's expedition in IGIO ? What occurred in 1614? What did Whitbourne do in 1615 and 1017 ? Mention the con- jiectiou wlti«h Lord Bttltimore had with the history of Hewfoundlau. The colony remained in the possession of the Calvert family until the Anierican revolution. t In 170;i— C5 the boundary-line between Maryland and Pennsylvania was laid down by Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon— two English astronomenA. Ever since the phrase " Mason and Dixon's line" has in- dicated the boundary between the Northern and Southern States. Questions.— Give a sketch of the second Lord Baltimore. Mention the contrast in religious liberty between Virginia and New England. What Is said of Mason and Dixon's line— French tribute— and Kertk'n settlement ? 222 nrsTORT op nkwi^oundland. rt»ARTVitr. huiulrofl families on tho iHhmd Thoy would liavo rapid- ly increased, but for the oppressive conduct of those who monopolized the fisheries. 1(). Snhstitnte for Gorcrnmvnf. — Newfoundland beinard by counsel. Nothing farther, however, was done; and the war with France and her encroachments m Newfoundland prevented any settled scheme from being ado{)ted. 17. hhmders Deported. — In the meantime, the jealous;y of the merchant fishing-traders, against the settlements already formed in Newfoundland was so great, that orders were even sent out to break \\\\ the settlements on the is- land and remove the islandeis ; ])ut Sir John Berry, one of the convoy captains, a humane man, remonstrated ; and in 1676 the King ordered that the removals should cease. Further emigration to the island was however, forbidden. Questions.— How waa government establishe*! ? What efforts were made to establish a fixed government in the island ? What is said of the attempted deportation of the islauderg ? \ Chap. XXI ri history ok NKWKmrNDLA>.*n. 22.^^ 18. The frr//- 0/1002-8. — Tlio continued rocnmin.'itlona between the rival colonies at l(Mi«rt,h resulted in a nnitual determination on the ])art of England himI France to con- test each other's power to ^^ain entire posst^ssion of the is- land and its fisheri<;s. The Kn^nch jjost of IMacentia was attacked in 1(VJ2, hut the governor made a HpiriliMl and 8ncc(!SHful defence. In retaliation, the French under Ilx^r- ville (from Canada) and Brouillon, made two attacks upon St. John's, in 1 01)0, and burned it to the ground. All the other British setthantiiits were destroyed, ex((![)t those at Bonavista and Carbonear, which made a successful resis- tance. An attempt was made to dislodge the invaders, but with little success. At length, by the treaty of Uyswi(;k, in 1097, the French restored all the j)laces they had taken during the contest, and thus endon the F'rench. In 170.'>-8, Placentia having been reinforced from Cana- da, and further aid having arrivc^d, the Frcuich retaliated with such vigor, that, with occasional reverses, they had acquired, in 1708, almost entire j)ossession of the island. The brave fishermen of Carbonear (aiL*Nl>LA\l). 225 In 17G3, tlu! truaty ol Paris, whicli conJlrincd iho Utrecht treaty of l('»I2, a;4.iiu put an oiul to t\w war and its evils. 4. Lahmdoi' Annejrpd. — In 17('>.'{, tlio I^al)ra(l()r roast, from Hudson's Strait to the west <^nd(»l Antieosti, includ- ing that island and the Ma^dalon Island , were politically atincxtMl to Newioundhmd, They ucr*', however, in 1773, restored to the governiniint of (^uehiic ; hut, in 1809, re-annexed to Newfoundland. They are now at- tached to the government of C'anada.* Cook, the cele- brated navigator, took part, in 17(12, in the re-capture of St. John's from the French, and was aft(;rwar(ls , passed into a law. The British navigation laws were, 17(55, extended to Newfoundland, and a custom-house established on the island. 6. American Revolution. — In 1774, the Americans j)ro- hibited the exportation of food to Newfoundland, because the islanders would not aid their cause. By the greatest exertioms on the part of England (then engaged in a war with Franco, Spain, and her revolted American colonies), the inhabitants wore, however, saved from starvation. Being acquainted with the coast, the French and Ameri- * This interesting group of islands lies in about tlio niiddlo of tlie Gulf of St. Lawrence. Amherst, the n\(tst important island, is about 5(» miles from Prince Edward Island, 60 from Cai)o lircton, I'JU from Knvfound- land, and 150 from Canada. Tlie other principal inland-s are : Entry, Grindstone, Allriglit, Gros.se Isle, and Byron. The Bird Uocka lie 50 miles north of Amherst Isle. The Magdalen Islands were ceded to England by France in 1703, and granted to Admiral Sir Isaac (^oftln (a native of Massachusetts) in 17!)8. They now belong to his nepliew. Admiral J. T. ColBn. The population is nearly 3,000, made up chiefly of tishermen and their families. The annual value of the exports from the islands is nearly $.300,000. Schools have of late been established in the principal islands of the group. Questions.— What is said of the annexation of Labrador and the Magdalen Islands ? Give an account of these islands. Describe Palli- BQi'i Act. What occurred iu the Island during the American Eevolutioa? 15 226 History of kewfoundland. [paet viii. can privateers harassed the colonists and destroyed their property, when not protected by the English cruisers. But at length the treaty with the separated colonies, in 1783, restored peace to Newfoundland. 7. Mutinous Conspiracy of 1800. — For some time after the Irish rel^ellion of 1798, a spirit of lawless dis- affection spread among the floating population of St. John's, and extended even to a regiment of soldiers which had been raised in the island. Through the wise discre- tion of the Roman Catholic Bishop O'Donnel the plot was discovered and its ringleaders punished. So grateful were the principal inhabitants of the island to the good bishop for his loyal and successful efforts in aiding Gen. Skerrett to frustrate the plot against their lives and prop- erty, that they united in a petition to the King to confer upon the bishop some act of royal favor. The petition was granted, and a pension of £50 sterling a year was conferred upon this excellent prelate during his life. 8. Disasters. — In 1775, the island was visited by a dreadful storm. The sea rose 20 feet ; hundreds of vessels of all sizes were driven on shore, inland property was destroyed, and about 300 persons lost their lives. In 1812-13 a famine occurred, which was greatly mitigated by the arrival of wheat and flour from Canada ; in 1816, St. John's was nearly destroyed by fire ; loss, $500,000, In 1817, two other fires occurred in St. John's, destroying property and provisions to the value of $2,000,000. A great scarcity of food was the consequence. Many riots occurred. England sent relief, and the citizens of Boston freighted a ship with food for the sufferers, and thus almost wiped off the stain of 1774. In 1832, Harbor Grace was burned. In June, 1846, another destructive fire visited St. John's, and about 2,000 houses were destroyed. England, as well as Canada, Nova Scotia, New Bruns- wick and Prince Edward Island, sent large contributions Questions. — Give the particulars of the mutiuont conspiracy of 1800. How did Bishop O'Donnell seels to counteract it ? What was given to the Bishop ? Give an account of the chief disasters related above — of the more important events which occurred from 1816 to 1846. ettlt- XXtll.] tilStORt OP iJlEWfOtJNt>LANt). 227 to relieve the suffering caused by this disastrous fire. In September, a furious hurricane ravaged the coast. Much property and many lives were lost. 9. War Again. — In 1793, the French republic declared war against England, and, before it terminated, the American republic also declared war, in 1812. In 1796, the town at the Bay of Bulls was taken and destroyed by the French vice-admiral ; but the energy of the Gover- nor, Sir James Wallace, and the loyalty of the inhabi- tants, prevented any further captures being made by him. The war was in other respects advantageous to the trade of Newfoundland. It ended *m 1814, when treaties of peace were signed. Depression m trade immediately fol- lowed ; but it revived again in 1818. In 1819, a fishery convention was concluded with the United States. 10. Social Progress. — In 1803, charity and Sunday schools were introduced and benevolent societies estab- lished by Governor Waldegrave, aided by the Roman Catholic Bishop and the Protestant clergy. In 1805, a post office was established at St. John's; in 1806, a news- paper was issued — now there are nine ; in 1808, militia volunteers were enrolled ; in 1808-11, efforts were made to establish friendly relations with the native tribes, but fear on their part prevented it; in 1810, Governor Duck- worth made a tour as far as Labrador, with the same object ; in 1822, an effort was made by W. E. Cormack, Esq., to explore the interior of the island. In 1824-6, an improved system of judiciary was introduced ; in 1828, the St. John's roads, first constructed by Governor Gower in 1806, were greatly improved ; in 1830, a court- house and the government liouse were erected ; in 1836, a banking-house was established ; in 1839, a geological survey was undertaken; the Roman Catholic Cathedral was commenced in 1841, and the Protestant Episcopal Cathedral in 1843 ; in 1844, the first mail steam-packet Questions.— How did the war of 1793 affect Newfoundland ? Give a sketch of the social progress of the island of Newfoundland from 1803 to 1810. Mention the principle events of interest which occurred in the island from 1822 to 1858. %■ 228 tttstORY OF* Nitwt'otlNrjLAKft. tf'ARTVtit. entered the harbor of St. John's ; in 1845, gaslight was lirst used in the island ; in 1846, an act required the liouses on two principal streets, parallel to the harbor, to be built of brick or stone ; in 1847, St. John's was sup- plied with water, agriculture encouraged, a public library and mechanics' institute founded ; in 1858, the ocean telegraph with Europe was successfully opened ; but in a few days afterwards, probably from injury to the sub- merged cable, it ceased to operate. Various improve- ments in the island have rapidly followed, and Newfound- land bids fair to enjoy peace and prosperity. 11. Political Progress. — In 1830, the civil disabilities of the Roman Catholics were removed. Want of har- mony between the Council and the Assembly, established in 1832, as well as election contests, led to strong politi- cal dissensions, both between individuals and the local newspapers, and many acts of personal violence occurred in 1840. In 1856, England entered into a convention with France in rcijard to the fisheries. Before final rati- fication, the matter was, in 1857, referred to the New- foundland Legislature for their consideration. The col- onists having strongly objected to the proposed conces- sions to France, England declined to carry the fishery convention into effect. In communicating to the Gover- nor of Newfoundland the articles of a: proposed fishery convention with France in 1857, the British Government nobly and distinctly laid down the important principle, " that the consent of the community of Newfoundland is regarded by Her Majesty's government as the essential preliminary to any modification of their territorial or maritime rights." This principle applies to all the colon- ies alike. In 1860, after the visit of His Roval High- ness the Prince of Wales, a disagreement arose on a financial question, bcstween Governor Bannerman and the Colonial Secretary, and a new Executive Council was Questions.— What telegraph was laid ? Give a sketch of the political progress of Newfoundland from 18.'i0-60. Mention the events which oc- curred in 1860-61. What important fishery concessiou was made to New- foundland and the other colonies in 1867 ? Chap. XXILI.] HISTORY OF MANITOBA. 229 formed. During the election under its auspices in 1861, serious rioting took place between the Roman Catholics and Protestants. Lives were lost and property des- troyed ; but at length peace was fully restored. Thus has Newfoundland happily reached a period in her history when under the paternal and powerful protection of Great Britain, she may enjoy the highest political and social prosperity. It is to be hoped that under the Con- federation of the Provinces, Newfoundland, although not yet a member of the Dominion, will continue to be a prosperous colony. For names of the Governors of Newfoundland, soc Appendix. QuKSTioN. — Mention tho political and social prospects of New- foundland. 230 HISTORY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. [PART IX. Part IX. CHAPTER XXIV. * Province of Manitoba and North West Territo- ries. Size, about half tliut cf British North America, or equal to a square of l,;j40 JuiluB. ^ ' Geographical Introduction. 1. Manitoba was settled bj Lord Selkirk in 1811. It was formed into a Province of the Dominion in 1870. Its boundaries now extend southward to the United States boundary line. 2. Climate and Soil. — Winter in Manitoba lasts about five months. The soil is deep and rich. On the Lower Saskatchewan River the winters are comparatively short and mild. To the north it is much colder. 3. Noted For. — The North West Territories are noted for their great extent, their fur trade, and their great bay, or inland sea. 4. Position and Extent. — These vast territories include nominally the following divisions : 1. Labrador ; 2. Prince Rupert Land ; and 3. Swan River and Saskatchewan, which were granted in 1670, by the charter of Charles II. to the Hudson Bay Company ; 4. Mackenzie River ; and 5. The North- West Indian^ Territories, leased by the Company in 1821, and transferred to Canada in 1868, and Keewatin, formed in 1876 out of a part of the North- West Territories. Labrador Peninsula Section. (Called by the Spaniards Tierra Labrador ^ it being less barren than Greenland.) 5. Noted For. — The Labrador Peninsula is chiefly Questions.— Give the size of Manitoba and N. W. Territories. Who first settled Manitoba ? Give an account o{ its cUm^te and soil. Pe« scribe its position and extent, Chap XXIV.] PROVINCE OF MANITOBA. 231 noted for its valuable coast fisheries, and its severe climate* 6. Position and Physical Features. — This extensive peninsula is the most easterly part of British North America. The country gradually rises into mountain highlands as it recedes from the coast. Near the centre, a range called the Wot-Chish Mountains forms a water- shed for the rivers. Prince Rupert Land (and East Main) Section. 7. Extent. — This portion of the North West Territory includes the whole of the country east, and south of Hudson Bay itself. Mackenzie and Great Fish Rivers Section. (" Mackenzie," bo called from Sir A. Mackenzie, who, in 1789, discovered tills Section which is now so named. 8. Extent, Sfc. — This section extends along the Arctic Ocean to the interior waters of the Great Bear, Great Slave, Athabaska, and Pelly Lakes, including the Mac- kenzie, Coppermine, and Great Fish Rivers. The North- West Indian Territories Section. (So named from being inhabited by various North- West Indian tribes.), 9. Extent. — The tvirritories extend nominally from the Mackenzie River Section to the Northern Saskatch- ewan, and include the indefinite areas drained by the Peace, Athabaska, and northern branch of the Saskatch- ewan Rivers. Manitoba, Swan, and Saskatchewan Rivers Section. 10. Extent. — This section includes the valley of the Questions.— What is said of Labrador ? What is said of Prince Rupert Land section ; of , Mackenzie and Great Fish Rivers sections ; and of the N. W. Indian Territories ? Give the extt^ut of the Red River, Swan, and gf^ikf^tchewan Rivers sections, 232 PROVINCE OF MANITOBA. [PART IX. Assinnibolue, Qii'appelle, the southern branch of the Saskatchewan, the northern part of lied River, and the Winnipeg Region. 11. Physical Features. — The valley of the Saskatch- ewan is an extensive tract of country, diversified by beauti- ful scenery and fertile plains. Manitoba is covered with rich prairies and lino lakes. From the Lake of the Woods, a fertile belt of land extends westward to the Rocky Mountains. For names of Governors of Manitoba, see Appendix. CHAPTER XXV. History of Manitoba and the North West Ter- ritories, FORMERLY CALLED THE HUDSON Bay Territory. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. Discovery — Trade — Charter — Intercolonial Contests — North West Company — Divisions. 1. Discovery. — The Hudson Bay (or Hudson Sea) is said to have been reached by Sebastian Cabot, in 1517. In 1523-4, Verrazzani sailed up the coast as far as Davis Straits which were reached by Davis in 1585. Various other English navigators sailed northwards, in quest of a northwest passage to India, but it was not until 1610 that Henry Hudson reached the Straits and Bay now bearing his name. Questions.— When and by whom was Hudson's Bay discoverfc^ Chap. XXV.] province OF MANITOBA. 233 2. Other Voyages. — Button, an English navigator visited the Bay in 1G12, Bylot and Baffin in 1616, and Fox and James in 1 63 1 . Baflin and James Bays were traced out and examined hy these navigators, and received their names. 3. The Connection with Eastern Canada was maintained by canoe, along the Saguenay river, and then(!c overland to the Bay, by the Quebec Fur Company, which was established by Cardinal Richelieu, in 1627. Tadoussac, at the mouth of the river, was their chief trading post in Canada. 4. English Trade. — The treaty of St. Germain-en-Laye, in 1632, confirmed the whole of the Hudson Bay territory to France, and De Grozellier and Radisson, two French Canadians, visited it. Having failed to induce their own governments to promote trade in it, they went to England. Prince Rupert entered warmly into their scheme, and despatched them to the Bay on a trading voyage. 5. Charter to the Hudson Bay Company. — They reached Nemisco, now called Rupert River, and their report being very favorable, Charles II. was induced (though, by the St. Germain-en-Laye Treaty, he had relinquished his claim to the territory) to grant Prince Rupert and others a charter for traffic, in furs and peltry, in those extensive regions, then called Rupert Land. This was the origin of the famous Hudson Bay Company's charter, of 1670. This charter was, in 1690, confirmed by an a<"*^ of the British Parliament, for seven years, but has never since been renewed. 6. French and English Conflicts in the territory were the conse(|uences of this charter, as the French claimed that Hudson Bay was part of New France. In 1672, MM. Albanel and St. Simon, with the consent of the In- dians of that region, planted the fieur-de-lis and the cross at several places, in token, for the third time, of the QiTESTiONS.— Wliat other voyages were made to Hiidson's^ay? What is said of the Sarr^oray ; English trade ? What led to the granting of the Hudson Bay charter of 1670 ? Give a sketch of the French and EngUBl\ conflicts in tUe Territory up to 1654, 234 PROVINCE OP MANITOBA. [Pabt IX. sovereignty of France over the territory. Having secured the services of De Grozellier, the French Pilot, the new English Hudson Bay Company despatched its first ex- pedition to Port Nelson, on the Bay, in 1G73. De Gro- zellier, not having remained faithful to his engagement with the English, was dismissed, and returned to Europe. Pie was received with favor in France, and returned to Canada shortly after the French West India Company, which traded in Canada, &c., was dissolved. In 1666, another Franco-Canadian company was formed at Quebec, to promote trade at the northwest, and De Grozellier and Radisson were despatched by it to Hudson's Bay to open a traffic. In 1679, Louis Joliette was despatched by the Quebec Company to Hudson's Bay, " in the public interest." The intrusion of the English in these terri- tories was keenly felt during this time. In 1682, Radis- son and De Grozellier were again despatched to Port Nelson, to counteract the trading designs of the English. In 1684, Radisson a second time deserted his fellow colo- nists and allied himself to the English. He went to Lon- don in 1684 and offered his services to the English Hud- son Bay Company. They were accepted ; and he was placed in command of an expedition, consisting of five vessels, which were despatched in that year to capture the French trading-posts at the Bay. This he did without difficulty. The destruction of the French factories at Port Nelson by Radisson, in 1684, led to spirited reprisals on the part of the company at Quebec; and Chevalier de Troyes and D'Iberville were despatched with troops from Quebec, and, in 1686, succeeded in capturing the principal forts of the company. In 1689, the English sent an expe- dition to retake their captured forts, but M. D'Iberville defeated them and took their ships. In 1 689, they again endeavored to accomplish their objects, but were again repulsed. D'Iberville returned to France in 1791 ; but, Questions.— WLat is Bald of De Grozellier and Radisson? Give a sketch of the trading contests of the French and English fit Hudson's Bay, Jiow did KmlisBon ^.ct \n this matter, Chap. XXV.J PROVINCE OF MANITOBA. 235 in 1004, ho was sent to the Bay, with three ships of war, and completed the conquest of the Englisli forts at that place. At the treaty of Ryswick, in 1097, and even up to 1713, the English company had only Fort Albany left. 7. Contest virtually closed — Treaties of Ryswick and Utrecht — At length the contests between the rival colonies in the Hudson Bay territory virtually ceased. By the treaty of Ryswick, entered into by France and England in 1697, both parties agreed to restore whatever places at the Bay they were possessed of before the war. Commissioners were appointed to determine this question ; but they appear never to have met. At the time of the treaty, however. Fort Albany, on the River Albany, at the east side of James Bay, was the only place in the territory in possession of the English traders, and it con- tinued in their possession undisturbed until the treaty of Utrecht, in 1713. By this noted treaty, France trans- ferred to England the whole of her rights to the Hudson Bay territory, and thus placed a bar on all the trading privileges of her Canadian subjects in that part of New France. The English company has since remained in possession of the territory. 8. Northwest Company of Canada. — In 1766, various traders, competitors of the company, engaged in the fur- trade. Their head-quarters were at Montreal, and they followed the old French routes into the interior. In 1784, these traders united, and formed the Northwest Company of Canada. This new company directed its trade chiefly to the northwest, via Lake Superior, towards the Pacific Ocean and Columbia River. They even sent trading-ships round Cape Horn. 9. Northwest Company^ s Explorations. — In 1793, Sir Alexander Mackenzie, a partner in the Northwest Com- pany, made his famous journey from Canada, across the Questions.— "What is said of the close of the contest aud of the treaties of Ryswick and Utrecht? Give a sketch of the North West Company of Cautida, What explorations across the continent did the Co, undertake ? 236 PROVINCE OF MANITOIJA. [PART IX. Rocky Mountains, to the Pacific Ocean (the first ever made north of Mexico), and discovered Fraser River. He afterwards discovered and explored the Mackenzie River. In 1811, Mr. Thompson, the astronomer, discov- ered the northern or main branches of the Columbia River, and descended its stream to the Pacific Ocean. 10. Lord Selkirk's Colony.— In 1811, the Earl of Sel- kirk purchased a tract of country from the Hudson Lay Company, lying between the United States boundary and lakes Winnipeg and Winnipegoos, since called the Red River Settlement, In 1812, he brought settlers from Scotland for his new colony. (Swiss were afterwards introduced; and in 1823, French Canadians.) Subse- quently, he appointed Capt. Miles McDonell (who was gov- ernor of the Company's district of Assinniboine), superin- tendent, who issued a proclamation forbidding the appro- priation of provisions except to the use of the colonists. This assumption of exclusive jurisdiction on the part of the Hudson Bay Company excited the bitterest feelings on the" part of the North- Western Company, and gave rise to the fierce contest of — 11. The Rival Companies in the Indian territories; during the progress of which the colonists were twice ex- pelled, and many lives lost, including that of Governor Semple. In 1816, Sir Gordon Drummond sent part of a regiment from Quebec to preserve order, and to restrain the violence of both companies. In 1821, the feud ceased, and the rival companies were amalgamated. When Lord Selkirk died, the company resumed the purchase, on condition of paying a certain quit rent. Most of the original settlers left the colony. The number of residents now amounts to about 12,000. It is a mixed population, and is rapidly increasing. In 1869, the whole North West territory was transferred to the Dominion, hav- ing been sold to it by the Hudson Bay Company for $1,500,000. QUESTIONB.— Mention the particulars of Lord Selkirk's efforts to found a colony. To what did they lead ? How was the dispute between the rival companies settkd ? OrtAP. XxVii htittisil coLitMbiA* JiS7 • 12. Manitoba. — In 1870 Manitoba (Red River) was set apart as a province of the Dominion of Canada. 13. Territorial Divisions. — The Hudson Hay Territory, now icnovvn as the Nortli West Territories, was divided into niinierous districts, which were embraced in several hiri;(; e it» physioal features. 23S Vakcoiivkr Island. {Pavlt 13t. • chief river. Tluj luirborH are excellent ; the principal of whi(!h are Ks(|uimuiih,, Victoria, Nanaimo (or Noonooa) Inlet, He(!cher Bay, and Barclay and Nootka Sounds, llaro Strait Hcparatcs Vancouver Ishind from tlie San Juan Archipelago. 4. 77/*? Clirtuttc. is considtired to be luialthy. There is little frost, and vegetation begins in February. The sum- mer is hot, the autumn dry, and tlu^ winter stormy ; fogs prevail, and the periodical rains fall heavily. 5. Products. — The agricultural cjipabilities of the is- land are very great. The principal products, in addition to those of the soil, are furs obtained chiefly from the beaver, the raccoon, the land-otter, and the sea-otter. Fish of the most valuable kind abound on the coast. Gold has been discovered, and coal is found in large quantities. CHAPTER XXVII. British Columbia. (So called from Christopher Columbus.) Size, with ialamls, the same as Quebec, or equal to u square of 4*50 m. Geographical Introduction. 1. Noted for. — British Columbia is noted for its rich gold-mines, and for its comparatively mild climate. 2. Extent. — This Province embraces the whole of Brit- ish North America west of the Rocky Mountains. It includes the colony formerly called British CoUunbia, the Stickeen District, Vancouver Island, and Queen Charlotte Island. It is about 900 miles long, with a breadth on the mainland varying from 250 to 500 miles. 3. Physical Features. — The scenery of the northern Questions, —What is said of the climate and products of Vancouver's Island? Mention the principal subjects of Chapter xxvii. For what ia British Columbia noted ? Give the size and extent of British Columbia. thUr. XXVIII BRITISH COLtJMBtA. 239 part i8 picturesque, being diverHified with mountain, lake and river. The southern part inehidcs tlie rich gold val- ley of the Fraser Uiver, and is wttll ada[)ted to agriculture and pasturage. In addition to the principal Rocky Mountain range along tho eastern boundary, two other parallel ranges naturally divide the country into three sections ; viz., (1) the Pacific slojje, (2) the Fras«?r liiver basin, and (.*0 the valley of the Tpper Colutnbia. The parallel ranges in British Cohunbia are the lilue and the Cascade Mountains. The principal j)eaks are Mounts JJrown and Hooker ; the former 1 (),0U0 feet, and the lat- ter l.'},Gi)0, above the sea level. IJe^tween these two peaks there is a pass called the Athabaska Portage, the summit of which is (devated 7,'MH) f(>et above the sea. To the south is the Kootainie J^iss, 0,()00 feet above the sea- level. 4. Climate. — 15(!tween the Cascade range and the Pa- cific coast the climatt; is e(piable ; but towards the East- ern Rocky Mountains it is very variable. Winter lasts from November till March ; but snow seldom remains long on the ground. The prevailing winds are from the north in summer, and from the south and the west in winter. The soil is fertile. 5. Commerce and Fuuinres. — The annual value of gold and other products exported from liritish Columbia and Vancouver Island is about SI 0,000,000; imports of Bri- tish Columbia are about $r),500,000 ; of Vancouver Island, $4,500,000. Questions.— DeBcribe its chief physical features. What is said of the climate, commerce, imports, exports, and liuances of British Columbia mud Vancouver Island. ^40 BRITISH COLUMJBlA [PAKT tX* CHAPTER XXVIII. ' History of Vancouver Island and British Columbia. Principal Subjects of this Chapter. * • Discovery of British Columbia and Vancouver Island, 1 . Discovery of the Pacific Ocean. — Balboa discovered the Pacific Ocean in 1513. Cortes explored the Pacific coast of America, from Mexico, in 1536, almost as far north as Cape Mendocino (California), in latitude 40^. Although Maorelhaens discovered the strait which bears his name in 1520, it was not until 1G15 (nearly a century afterwards) that Schouten, a native of Hoorn in the Netherlands, doubled the Cape which he named Hoorn, or Horn, and thus for the first time reached the Pacific Ocean by sailing directly round the most southern part of the American continent. 2. Discovery of Vancouver Island. — Sir Francis Drake is supposed to have gone as far north on the Pacific coast as the Juan de Fu-ca Strait in 1578 ; and Cavendish also made some discoveries in the North Pacific in 1587. In that year he captured a Spanish ship off the coast, but put the crew on shore. Juan de Fu-ca, a Greek sailor, and one of the crew, was subsequently dispatched by the Viceroy of Mexico to make discoveries along the coast northwards. He is reported to have reached, in one of his expeditions, the strait which now bears his name. The Spaniards made various discoveries along the same coast in subsequent years ; but it was not until 1778 that Cap- tain Cook, by direction of the British government, ex- plored the coast as far north as Nootka Sound. In that year some London merchants made a settlement at Noot- QuESTiONS. — Give a brief summary of the history of the discovery of the Pacific Ocean, and of Vancouver Island. Give an account of the discoveries by Sir Francisi Drake and Captain Cook. tUAt. XXnil.l BRITISH COLUMBIA. 241 ka Sound for tks purpose of establishing a depot for Chi- nese trade. In 1779, Capt. Mears, R.N., named, and, in part, explored the Strait of Juan de Fu-ca. In 1792, Capt. Vancouver, R.N., was despatched from England to the Pacific to meet Senor Quadra, a Spanish commission- er, and to settle with him matters of difference, as to terri- tory, which had arisen on the coast between England and Spain. Vancouver was further directed to explore the adjacent coast (with a view to determine the north-west passage), especially *the Strait itself and Admiralty Inlet. He afterwards, following the course of an American cap- tam, threaded his way through the islands of the Gulf of Georgia (named by him after George III), to Queen Charlotte*s Sound. Out of compliment to the Spanish commissioner, Capt. Vancouver associated Quadra's name with his own in naming the island ; but it now bears only the name of Vancouver, — that of Quadra having fallen into disuse. 3. Discoveries across the Continent. — In 1771, John Hearn, an employ^ of the Hudson Bay Company, was induced to explore " the far-off metal river " running northwards into the Arctic Ocean, and thus discovered the Coppermine River and Great Slave Lake. Another dis- tinguished explorer. Sir Alex. Mackenzie, discovered, in his first expedition into the interior, the large river, since known as the Mackenzie River, which also falls into the Arctic Ocean. In 1792, while Vancouver was exploring the coast, Mackenzie, following up the course of the Peace River, crossed the Rocky mountains into British Colum- bia. Here he reached the Tatouche Tesse, which he sup- posed to be the Columbia River, but which was afterwards known as the Fraser River. From this river he crossed the country towards the Pacific Ocean, which he reached by way of the Salmon River. In 1806, Simon Fraser, an. employe of the North- West Fur Company of Canada, Questions.— Sketch the discoveries of Mears and Vancouver. How did the Island of Vai^couver receive its name ? Give u sketch of the discov- eries across the continent which were made by Hearn and by Sir A. Mackenzie. 16 ^ 24*2 BllITISH COLtJMBIA. ft^ART iX* explored the country from Fort Chippewayan (Lake Athabaska), and crossing the Rocky Mountains, formed a trading-post at Fraser Lake, on a tributary of the river to which we have referred, and which was also named after him. 4. Boundary and Settlement, — In 1843 "Vancouver Island was first occupied by the Hudson Bay Company, and Victoria, the capital, founded. This capital was selected by James Douglas, Esq., the Governor, on behalf of the Hudson Bay Company. In 1844, the Boundary- line between the United States, and what is now known as British Columbia, was determined. In 1849, Vancouver Island was conditionally granted by the Queen to the Company, for the purpose of settlement. Subsequently a dispute arose between the British and American Gov- ernments as to the construction of the boundary-treaty, both parties claiming the island of San Juan, which is situ- ated in the Haro Archipelago, as within their territory. In 1856 a joint commission was appointed to settle the dispute, but failed to eifect a settlement. In 1872, the Emperor of Germany, to whom the matter had been re- ferred, decided that the boundary line should pass through the Haro channel, thus giving the Island of San Juan to the United States. 5. Discovery of Gold. — In 1859 gold was first publicly known to exist in the valley of the Fraser River, and thousands immediately flocked thither. Mining regula- tions were issued by the governor, and routes projected into the interior, where gold was chiefly found. The ex- istence of gold in these regions was previously known to a few, and especially to the Indians. In 1862 it was dis- covered in Queen Charlotte's Island. 6. Colonial Government established. — In the year 1859 the occupation of Vancouver Island was resumed by the Queen ; and it, together with B^-vtdsh Columbia (now so QVE8TiOKSw^GiT« s Rketch of yraser's discoveries. Give also a detailed Account of the boundary and settlement of British Columbia and Vancou- ver island. What dispute aiose ? What is aaid of the discovery of gold ? Chap. XlVinj BRITISH COLUMBIl.. 243 noted for its gold mines,) was erected into two British Crown Colonies, with separate boundaries, but under one government. James Douglas, Esq., the resident Hudson Bay Company's agent, or local governor, was invested with the same authority by Her Majesty, with jurisdiction over both colonies. Laws were first made by the Gov- ernor and his Executive Council and promulgated by royal proclamation, after which they were submitted to the Queen and both Houses of Parliament. In 1863, separate Governors were appointed for each of the two colonies ; and the name New "Westminster was given to the capital of British Columbia by the Queen, at the re- quest of the inhabitants. The site of New Westminster was selected by Colonel Moody, in preference to Fort Langley, which is on the American side of the Eraser River. 7. Union and Confederation. — In 1866, the two colo- nies were united under one Governor and Legislature. In 1871, British Columbia, and Vancouver Island (as one province), joined the Dominion. Such a union of all the colonies of British North America will promote the con- struction of the great Pacific Railway, so long projected, through British territory. A route for this railway was explored by Captain Palliser in 1858-9. It extends from Fort Garry, at the confluence of the Red River and the Assinniboine, in Manitoba, to New Westminster, and fol- lows, for a portion of the distance, the course of the As- sinniboine and South Saskatchewan Rivers, crossing the Rocky Mountains at the Vermillion Pass. The distance from Portland, Maine, to Victoria, Vancouver Island, bj this route (by way of Chicago, St. Paul's, Pembina, Sas katchewan, and the Rocky Mountains), is 3,200 miles. Questions.— How are these colonies governed ? What is said of Con federation with the Eastern Provinces ; of the proposed route of thf Pacific railway ? How is tlie administration of the colonies conducted ? >.u m APPENDIX. APPENDIX. -0- Govemors of Canada. — The following are the names of the Governors of Canada since its discovery : 1. Ifew France. Jean Fran9oi8 de la Roque, Sieur de lioborval, Vice Itoi. Marquis de la lloche, do. do. . . 1540 1598 2. Canada — Royal Government Ea- taolished. Samuel de Cham plain, Viceroy 1612 Marc Antoine de Bras do fer de Chateaufort 1635 Chevalier de Montmagny 1636 Chevalier d'Ailleboust de Cou- longe 1648 and 16.57 Jean de Lauzon 1651 Charles de Laiison Charny 1656 Viscount de Voyer d'Aigeuson 1658 Baron du Bois d'Avaugour — 1661 Chevalier de Saffray Mesy 1663 Alexandre de Proville Tracy. . 1663 Chevalier de Coiircelles 1665 Count de B'rontenac..l672 and 1680 Sieur de la Barre 1682 Marquis de Denonville 1685 Chevalier de Calli^res 1699 Marquis de Vaudreuil 1703 Marquis de Beauharnois 1726 Count de Galissonnifere 1747 Marquis de la Jonquifere 1749 Marquis du Quesne de Menne- ville 1752 Marquis de Vaudreuil Cavag- ual 1755 3. Province of Quebec. Gen. James Murray, Gov. Gen, 1765 Paulus E. Irving, Esq., Presdt. 1766 Gen. Sir Guy Carleton, (Lord Dorchester,) Governor-Gen- eral 1766, 1774, 1776, and 1793 Hector T. Cramahe, President 1770 Gen. Frederick Haldimand 1773 Henry Hamilton, Lieut.-Gov.. 1774 Henry Hope, Esq., do 1775 4. Lower Canada. Colonel Clarke, Lieut.-Gov .... 1791 Gen . Robert Prescott 1796 SirR.S. MUnes 1799 Hon. Thos. Dunn, Pres., 1805 & 1811 SirJ. H.Craig 1807 Sir George Prevost 1811 Sir G. Drummond, Admmist . . 1816 Gen. John Wilson, Administ. . 1816 Sir J. Coape, Sherbrooke 1816 Duke of Richmond 1818 Sir James Monk, President... 1819 Sir Peregrine Maitland 1820 Earl of Dalhousie — 1820 and 1825 SirF. N. Burton, Lieut.-Gov.. 1824 Sir James Kempt, Administ. . . 1828 Lord Aylmer, Administrator. . .1837 Earl of Gosford 1837 Sir J. Colborne, (Lord Seaton). 1838 Earl of Durham 1838 C. Poulett Thompson, (Lord Sydenham 1839 5. Upper Canada. Col. J. G. Simcoe, Lieut.-Gov. . 1792 Hon. Peter Russell, President. .1792 General Peter Hunter 1799 Hon. Alexander Grant, Prest. . 1805 Hon. Francis Gore .... 1806 and 1815 Sir Isaac Brock, President. ... 1811 Sir R. Haie Sheaffe, President. 1813 Baron F. de Rottenburg, Pros. 1813 Sir Gordon Drummond 1813 Sir George Murray 1815 Sir Frederick P. Robinson 1815 Hon. Sam. Smith, Adm. 1817 & 1820 Sir Peregrine Maitland .1818 «& 1820 Sir J. Colborne, (Lord Seaton) 1828 Sir Francis B. Head 1836 Sir George Arthur 1838 Gen. Sir William Evre, Adm. . 1857 Lord Viscount Monck. . .1861 & 1866 Gen. Sir John Michel, Adm. . 1866 6. Province of Canada. Baron Sydenham and Toronto. 1841 Gen. Sir R. Jackson, Admin. . . 1841 Sir Charles Bagot 1842 Sir Charles (Baron) Metcalfe. . 1843 EarlCathcart 1845 Earl of Elgin and Kincardine. 1847 Sir Edmund W. Head, 1854 and 1867 7. Dominion of Canada. Sir John Young, (Lord Lisgar) 1867 Earl of Duf^erfu 1872 APPENDIX. 245 Governors of Nova Scotia.— 'Sot including Senior Councillors who acted as Lieutenant-Governors during the absence or death of tliat officer, the following is a list of the French and English Governors of Acadie, or Nova Scotia : 1. Fbench Goveunoks ok Acadie at Pout Koyai,. M. de Poiitrincourt 1604 Jsaao de Kazillai. iiVSS Charles do Charnizay 1047 Cliarles de la Tour 1(152 M . Manival 1G»5 M. de Villebon 1687 M- de Brouillon 1700 M. de Siibercase 1706 Baron SL. Castiue 1710 2. EiJGLiSH Governors of Nova Scotia at Port Royal. Col. V'otch 1710 Kraiicis Nicholson, Esq 1714 Kichard Philips, Esq 1719 Lawrence Armstrong, Esq 1725 Paul JVlascarene, Esq 1740 3- English Governors of Nova Scotia at Halifax. Hon. Edward Cornwallis 1749 Peregrine T. Hobson, Esq 1752 C.'harTes J^awrence, Esq 1754 Hon. Kobert Monckton 1756 Jonatlian Belcher, Esq 1760 iSlontague Wilniot, Esq 1763 Michael Francklin, Esq. 1722 & 1766 l.ord William Campbell, 1766 & 1772 I'Vaucis Le^ge, Esq 1773 AJariot Arbuthnot, Esq 1776 Kichard Hughes, Esq 1778 Sir Andiew S. Hauuuoiid 1781 .lohn Parr, Esq 1782 Edward Fanning, Esq 1783 li. Bulkley, Esq 1791 John Wentworth, Esq 1792 Sir George Prevost 1808 Sir John Coape Sherbrooko 1811 Gen. Darroch 1811 Gen. Smyth 1816 Earl of IJalhousie 1819 Sir John Kempt 1820 M. Wallace, Esq 1826 Sir Peregrine Maitland 1828 Sir Colin Campbell 1834 Lord Falklanci 1840 Sir John Harvey 1846 Sir J. G. LeMarchant 1852 The Earl of Mulgrave 1858 Sir Kichard Graves Macdouell.1864 4. Dominion Governors. Gen. Sir F. W. Williams 1865 Sir C Hastings Doyle SirE. Kem^y 1867 Hon. Joseph How 1873 HoiL E. Archibald 18i3 The Governors and Presidents of New Brunswick have been as follows : Guy Carleton, Esq., Gov 1784 Hon. G. G. Ludlow, President..l786 Hon. E. Winslow, President,... 1803 Col . G . Johnston, President .... 1808 Gen. M. Hunter, Governor 1809 Gen. W. Balfour, President. . . .1811 Gen. G. S. Smyth, President... .1812 Gen. Sir J. Saumarez, Pres 1813 Col. H. W. Hailes, President. ..1816 Gen. G. S. Smyth, Governor... .1817 Hon. Ward Chipman, Pres 1823 HoM. .1. ^' '*Uss, Presidout. . . .1824 Gen. Sir Howard Douglas 1825 Hon. W. Black, President 1829 Gen. Sir A. Campbell, Gov 1832 Geii. Sir John Harvey, Gov ...1837 Sir W. M. G. Colebrooke, Gov. .1841 Sir E. Walker Head, Gov 1848 Hon. J. H. T. Manners Sutton..l864 Hon. A. Gordon, Governor 1862 Sir C. Hasiuigs Doyle, Lt-Gov..l866 Col. F. P. Harding, Lt-Gov 1867 Hon. L. A. Wilmot, Lt-G0Y.,..1868 ( JVOfT READY ELEMENTARY ;*•'; ARITHMETIC, IN DECIMAL CURRENCY, AND KEY TO DO. New and Revised Editions from New* Plates. ■ <•» PRICE IN BOARDS, PAPER COVERS. Price of the Aritlimetic 25 cents. Price of Key to do 60 '' JUST PUBLISHED— Price 35 Cents f LOVELL'S FIRST STEPS IN GENERAL GEOGRAPHY, WITH MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS ; Being Introductory to Lovell's " Easy Lessons in Ukneral Gkooraphy." JOHN LOVELL5 PUBLISHER, MONTREAL. OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. The work is got up in the usual neat manner for which this house is cok^- brated, whilst the general features of tlie book are such as to commeiHl themselves to the understanding of the young Tpupil— Evening Times, Hamilton. Printed in bold clear type. The maps and illustrations are numerous and good. Lovell's Series of School Books are second to none, and Cana- dians should reward his efforts and encourage home productions by pur- chasing these books in preference toothers.— Z)ai/y News, Kingston. In point of engraving, printing and paper, this book is infinitely superior to any work of the kindwhicli has ever been issued by the press of Canada, and fully equals the best English and American Geographies. The maps are well-colored, and the lettering on them stand out distinct and clear, and can bo made out without the slightest difficulty, while the other en- gravings are also excellent. — Monitor, DrockvUle. This ia an excellent little work, and has only to be examined by teachers to be approved. The information is accurate, and, as far as regards poli- tical geography, is brought down to date. The maps and illustrations are beautifully executed, and add greatly to the value of the book. The motto which Mr. Lovell has chosen for his series of school books, " Encourage home talent," has alwavs been ours, especially with regard to text-books to be used in our schools, on the quality and tone of which so much de- pends.— TAe Gazette, Montreal. Lovell's series of school books are now the standard text-books in most of our schools, and aro justly popular. The First Steps will serve as an introduction to Easy Lessons in General Geography, a work which met with a very favorable reception when first published, and whose value will be still further enhanced by the publication of the present elementary treatise. Tlie letter-press is in the foriu of questions and answers, framed with a vii>*" to cloavnosj oxxl pf«oisioin>*aoii,the axvag^ aro neatly colored and beat' Hi'u My Clear a/id tastlncjt, J'tUi'^'-litth; yffiVi places the study of Geography within reach bf .tho vfery»yourig»/liTd ia \ valuable addition to the series of 'school' books f)utflisu5d'b]^ UdUn •J5(5vell.— £>ui/y Star, Montreal. ,,,, ,,_.., •,•,•»»•• It is InteTtded, iu, })rejia,r4?vt1ip"i^a37tft)r l5)^»l&iMfer Jlnd more advanced . treatises en- tliis iiitcresMng aiwl usefui -stutry. T&e wpjl^ is really notice- able in many respect's f'or its ^xcelfeVide! 'First', it is a marvel of conden- sation, next accuracy and sense are not sacrificed either to condensation or simplicity; then the maps are good, and the engravings intended to illustrate the lessons clear and instructive. Indeed, the worx is one of the most excellent of its kind we have ever seen, because of the clear, concise and simple way in which it presents the " elements " of geographical science, and all the leading facts connected with tlie geography of the world.— G/ote, St. John, N.B. in One Vol Crown 8vo., Clothe 570 pages. Price $1. (Free by Mail on receipt of the price.) ■ ^ ■ THE DOMINION ELOCUTIONIST • AND PUBLIC READER; A system of Elocution formed on the Pniloaophy of the Human Voice, and the Logical Structure of the Language. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS AND BXERCI8E8 FOR THE CUL r/VA TION OF THE SPEAKING VOICE. AND FOR Expressive Reading and Oratorical Delivery. Selections in Oratory, Fiction, Poetry and the Pram A, ESPBOIALLT ADAPTED FOR Public Beadiags, Self-Instruction, and for use in Schools and CoUegos. ■ 4»» « . BY RICHARD LEWIS, Teacher of Elocution. ^ » From th9 Bev. W. Morley Funshon, LL.D. To those •who desire to study elocution as an art, I can recommend Mr. Lewis' book. I approve the systsni jnore highly than some to which my at- tention has been divc/ctcJ ; for.it-if ota ^H^a.ny rigjd system can leave, f^r the occa- sional abandon of true. orat^n'j^. ''■'•:', The selections ke^fi 'nproui ftcqiiaini'an^e with many old favorites, and in- troduce us pleasantly t9 so^jio i^ow o^^es. , I, wish thn book every success. 7roB the Bev. Uauriro 5. Baldwin, )&.i'.f Secljr 'Christ Chnroh CAthedrMil, Montreal. The book supplies a long felt want. The rules laid down for instruction are admirable, while the selections for reading are judicious. All books of this sort whicii go to elevate the taste, and make the young acquainted with the best thoughts of our great masters, should be encouraged. The volume before me, coming, as it does, from a Canadian source, and issued in so neat a form and reasonable price, is especially welcome. MAURICE S. BALDWIN.