IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) t 1.0 ^1^ 1^ Sf U£ 12.0 I.I J^ ^ ^^\v ^^^ ^\^J /r% '/ HiotogFaphic Sdeices Corporation <^ ^. ■/J WBT MAIN STMIT VV*':^5TI» N.Y. ^ (SM (7l«)tfi.MS03 ;\ ■<<^ A ^ CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHIVI/ICIVIH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microraprcductions / Institut Canadian da microraproductions hlstoriquas 6^ Technical and Bibliographic Notas/Notas tachniquas at bibiiographiqua* Tha Inatituta haa attamptad to obtain tha baat original copy availabia for filming. Faaturaa of thia copy which may ba bibliographically uniqua, which may altar any of tha imagaa in tha raproductlon, or which may aignificantly changa tha uauai mathod of filming, ara chackad balow. D D n D D n Coiourad covara/ Couvartura da coulaur I I Covara damagad/ Couvartura andommagAa Covara raatorad and/or laminatad/ Couvartura raatauria at/ou paiiicuiAa □ Covar titia miasing/ La titra da couvartura manque I I Coiourad mapa/ Cartaa gtographiquas en coulaur Coiourad ink (i.a. othar than blua or black)/ Encra da coulaur (i.a. autra qua biaua ou noire) □ Coloured platea and/or iiluatrationa/ Planchaa at/ou iiluatrationa en couleur □ Bound with other material/ Rail* avac d'autrea documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ Lareliure serrie peut causer de I ombre ou de la distortion le long de la ma^ga intArieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ 11 se peut que certaines pages bianchea ajout^es lors d'une rentauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela Atait possible, ces pages n'ont pas At6 f ilmtes. Additional comments:/ Commentaires supplAmentairas; L'Institut a microfilm* le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a At* poaaibia de se procurer. Les details da cat exemplaire qui aont paut-Atre uniques du point de vue bibiiographiqua, qui pauvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dana la mAthoda normale de filmage aont indiquAs ci-dassous. r~| Coloured pages/ D Pagea de couleur Pages damaged/ Pages endommag^as Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurtes at/ou paliiculAes Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ Pages dAcolorAes, tacheties ou piquies Pages detached/ Pages dAtachAas Showthrough/ Transparence I I Quality of print varies/ Qualit* intgata da I'impression Includes supplementary material/ Comprend du material supplAmantaire Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponlble Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totaiement ou partieilement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure, etc., ont 6t6 fiimies A nouveau de fa^on d obtenir la meilleure image possible. T s T v« N : b( ril re m This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document eat film* au taux da reduction indiqu* ci-deaaoua 10X 14X 18X 22X 2BX 30X y 12X 16X aox 24X 28X 32X tails du odifier una fnaga Tha copy filmad hara haa baan raproducad thanka to tha flanarosity of: Library of the Public Archivat of Canada T fia imagaa appaaring hara ara tha baat quality possibia conaidaring tha condition and iagibility of tha original copy and in kaaping with tha filming contract spacif icationa. Originel copiaa in printad papar covars ara fiimad beginning with tha front covar and ending on the last page with a printad or illuatrated imprea- sion, or tha back covar when appropriate. All other original copiaa ara filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illuutratad imprea- aion, and ending on the laat page with a printed or illustrated impression. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain tha symbol -^ (meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol V (meaning "END"), whichever applies. L'exemplaira filmA f ut raproduit grAca i la g4n4roaitA da: La bibiiothAqua das Archives publiques du Canada Las imagaa auivantea ont At* reproduites avac la plus grand soin, compta tenu de le condition et de la nattet* de i'exempleire film*, et en conformKA avac las conditions du cohtrat de fllmaga. Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en papier eat ImprimAa sont fiimAs en commenpant par le premier plat et en terminant salt par la darnlAre page qui comporta une empreinte d'impreasion ou d'illustration, soit par la second plat, salon la caa. Tous les autrea exemplaires originaux sont filmis en comment ant par la pramiAre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impreaaion ou d'illustration at en terminant par la darnlAre page qui comporte une telh empreinte. Un des symboles sulvants apparattra sur ia darniAre image de cheque microfiche, selcn le cas: le aymbole — »> signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbols ▼ signifie "FIN". Maps, plates, charta, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure ara filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right end top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams iliuatrate the method: Lea cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre f ilmte A des taux de reduction diff Arents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre reproduit en un aeui clichi, 11 est f ilmi A partir da Tangle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite, et de haut an baa, an prenant le nombre d'imagea nAcessaira. Les diagrammas sulvants illustrant la mAthode. rata b elure. : 2X 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 4- THE DEBATE VPON MB. WARD'S RESOLUTIONS, ON COLONIZATION, IN THB . A^i^ 'v^-;^'. HOUSE OF COMMONS, JUNE 2V , 18S9, ,.«,;; S^; CONTAINING THE SPEECHES H. G. WARD, ESQ. M.P. SIR W. MOLESWORTH, BART. M.P. RIGHT HON. HENRY LABOUCHERE, M,P. W. WARBURTON, ESQ. M.P. AND RIGHT HON. VISCOUNT HOWICK, M.P. CORHECTED BY THE SEVERAL SPEAKERS, •%- LONDON : RIDGWAY, PICCADILLY. 1839. WASTE LANDS OF THE COLONIES. Speech op H. G. Ward, Esq. Mr. Speaker, — I am aware of the difficulty, at a time when party spirit runs high, and party struggles occupy too many of those hours which ought to be given to the practical purposes of legislation, of inducing the House to give a patient hearing to a question, which not only has no party interest to recommend it, but which it is necessary to illustrate by a particular class of facts, and details, to which very few members of this House are in the habit of attaching that importance, which in my judgment, they deserve. Feeling this, and know- ing how little it is in my power to impart any attraction to the subject, beyond that, which its intrinsic merits may command, I should have shrunk from bringing forward the Motion of which I have given notice, if 1 had not felt that the question was one, which not only ought to be brought under the con- sideration of the House, but which could not, in justice to the country, be deferred. I admit that there are no hopes of legis- lating upon it during the present Session ; but I call upon the House to fix the grounds, upon which future legislation must rest, — to affirm the principles upon which the Government must act, — and to permit me to shew what there is in the esta- blishmcQt of those principles interesting to the community at large, and more peculiarly to that portion of the community, whose industry is their daily bread. No man who thinks at all, can look at the present condition of the Working classes, the state of excitement that prevails amongst them, and the wild theories, that have been broached by their leaders at the public meetings which have recently taken place, without B 2 feelings both of commiseration, and alarm. I have watched narrowly the course of the present movement, and, when I look to the fact, ihat the peace of England has been endangered, during the last twelve months, by an agitation against property — against law— against society itself, I think myself entitled to ask, even those who have least faith in the possibility of a remedy, whether anv experiment that holds out the hope of a remedy ought not to be tried ? Sir, I am convinced that no great popular movement has ever taken place, without having economical causes at the bottom of it. It is physical suffering that engenders political discontent. In the present instance this is pre-eminently the case. Chartism is a knife and fork question — a bread and cheese question, as Mr. Stephens has called it — an attempt to effect great social, through the medium of great political changes — to acquire property by acquiring the franchise — to get rid at once, of political dis- abilities, and distress. We, in this House, know perfectly well, that these hopes are illusory, and that the welfare of the Working classes in this country, depends, in a great degree, upon the preservation of that very artificial system which they denounce, and would destroy if they had the power, to-mor- row ; — since, without the assistance which capital and credit afford to the poorer classes in this country, they could not exist. In lieu of the comparative comforts which many enjoy, they would be left a prey to absolute starvation. But how convince them of this ? How reason with empty stomachs? How persuade men, who work fourteen, fifteen, and even sixteen hours a day, for a pittance barely sufficient to sustain life, that there is not something unsound, and rotten, in a system that produces such results? And it must not be forgotten, that the sufferings of the poorer classes in this country are enhanced by the constant contemplation of the luxuries of the rich. They see every comfort, and blessing, that it is possible for wealth to purchase, or human ingenuity to devise, showered down upon the affluent, as if in mockery of their own distress, while they were entirely, and hopelessly, deprived of all anticipa*^ tion of ever participating ia blessings, which they may learn to appreciate, but can never enjoy. I have visited many countries, and I have no hesitation in saying, that in no part of the world does there exist such a fearful distinction between the richer, and poorer, classes, as here — in no country is the line of demarcation between them so rigidly drawn, and so seldom crossed, — in no country are the extremes of wealth and poverty brought into such fearful, and dangerous, juxta-posi- tion. I can well understand, under these circumstances, how the feelings originate with which the Chartists have been taught to regard what they term the Property classes in this country. Feelings of jealousy, hatred, and distrust have been excited against all who possess property amongst us, and a belief has been engendered in the minds of the la- bouring classes that they are money-mongers, profit-mongers, blood-suckers — men who would grind the faces of the poor for their own unworthy ends. Expressions of this kind are invariably applied to the property classes by the Chartist orators and the Chartist press ; so that those who have nothing, are induced to regard as their natural enemies, all who have any thing to lose. Much ingenuity has been shewn by some of the Chartist leaders, iii enforcing these doctrines by the most sin- gular misapplication, and perversion, of Scriptural texts. Every one must have observed this who has been in the habit of reading the productions of the Chartists ; for it was only in a newspaper of Sunday last, that advocates their principles, that I saw a most singular interpretation of the text " Be ye fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it," which was construed not only into a permission, but a command, to every man of the age of twenty-one, to marry, whether he could support a family or not, with the assurance that, if labour failed him, he might claim as his inheritance a portion of the land. He was told that if he could not obtain the means of subsistence otherwise, he was justified in demanding, or taking it, from the produce of the land. This feeling has been en- couraged still more by the language of persons, who have refused to countenance the resort to physical force, or other outrage. An honourable friend of mine, whom I regret to see not in bis place, I mean the Member for Birmingham — who has always kept honourably aloof from the violent proceedings of the Chartists, has nevertheless given the sanction of his autho- rity to some of the extravagant opinions which they put forth. He has said, that it should be in the power of every man to procure " a fair day's wages for a fair day's work, and a full day's wages for a full day's work." Now, I cannot help express- ing my regret at finding such a doctrine held by such a man, who has thus given the sanction of his name to what I cannot but regard as a gross politico-economical heresy- It may be said that the diffusion of education would put a stop to such errors, but we have not time to wait for the result of education when opinions like these are generally entertained. I listened with deep interest to the opinions expressed on the subject of educa- tion the other night by my honourable friend the member for Liskeard ; but looking to the state of so large a portion of the population, I should like him to explain how we can expect to educate men, whose lives are spent in procuring the means of living from day to day? What is the state of the popula- tion employed in the Factories? They are engaged in long hours of wearisome toil every day of their lives — and in pro- curing food for the body, have no time to think of food for the mind. The Hand-loom weavers are still worse off!. I re- collect in the debate on the Corn-laws, I referred to the case of a man named Marsden, which made much impression on the House, but several honourable members immediately asked me whether this man was not a Hand-loom weaver, when I had described the privations endured by him, and on my answering in the affirmative, many turned away, as if they were not surprised at such sufferings when they heard the occupation of the man. But are the Hand-loom weavers ** Pa- riahs?" Are they outcasts from society ? Are one million of human beings to be exposed to such sufferings without pity or prospect of relief? It is now well ascertained that their distress 7 is not caused by the mere competition with machinery ; for it was proved before the Commissioners appointed to enquire into their condition, that one great cause of the pressure on the Hand-loom weavers is, the competition that exists in the trade itself. It was called by Mr. Symons " the common sewer of our industry/' because so easily acquired, and there- fore always overstocked. But how are we to bring education to bear upon men whose condition is so wretched, yet who form such a large mass of the population, as they amount in number to upwards of a million ? Mr. Symons, in his report upon their state, and prospects, says, ** When a man's whole faculties are strained to the utmost, from sunrise to sunset, to procure a miserable subsistence, he has neither leisure, apti- tude, nor desire for information. He is assimilated to the beasts of burthen, and gradually partakes of their animalism, for in the degree in which extreme privation bars out civiliza- tion and refinement, is scope given to each brutalising impulse and passion." He says also, " that there is a total decay of reading amongst them — that there is little scope for the exer- cise of prudence — and that religion has lost its influence, — as their only care and anxiety is how to procure their daily meal. Their children are growing up in a state of semi- barbarism, and yet they have the strongest desire to educate them. There is no communication between them and the wealthier classes, for rarely do the language of sympathy, or the kindlier influences of charity, gladden their damp, and dreary dwellings." The pressure is very great on other classes as well as the Hand-loom weavers. If we inquire, we shall learn that in the Factories the hours of labour are increasing, while the amount of wages is gradually growing less. If we go to the Agricul- tural districts, more particularly in Devonshire, we shall find that wages during the last winter were only six, or seven, shil- lings a week, while wheat was ten shillings a bushel. Again, what is the condition of at least one-half of the human race in this country ? We are in the habit of boasting of being a 8 moral country, and of the distinction, and care, with which women are treated amongst us. Yet in no country with which I am acquainted does there exist so vast a mass of female misery, and degradation, as here. Not more than one woman out of three can marry at an early age, because such is the pressure of population upon the means of subsistence, that not more than that proportion of men can afford to do so. Employment of any kind is so difficult to be procured by females, that after working sixteen, or seventeen, hours a day at needlework, they hardly obtain sufficient to give them a bare subsistence — I be- lieve not more than Sd. a day. The consequence is distress, and prostitution, to an extent, and beginning at an age, unheard of in any other Christian community. Thousands every year are running their brief career of misery, drunkenness, dis- ease, the canal, or the unknown, and unhallowed, grave. This is the fate of a large portion of that sex, which we profess to love, to honour, to revere, and which, under happier circum- stances, sheds the brightest influence over our lives. Sir, these things may shock delicacy, and wound national pride, but they ought to be known. They are truths that must be told, for they are part of the system, with which we have to deal, and of the evils that we have to remedy, if we wish to avoid the danger of what are termed Revolutionary principles. Revo- lutionary principles are harmless in a sound, and healthy, state of society, but they become highly dangerous when put forward in a state of thing? like that which this country now sees, when men, in a condition of intense suffering and poverty, add to ignorance, an organization of numbers, with little or nothing' to hope from things as they are, and who are consequently prepared to welcome any, and every, change. Among the popu- lation of this country, there is an immense mass of disaffection arising out of physical suffering, combined with ignorance, — with a consciousness of civil, and political, rights, a sense of injustice done, and a hopelessness of redress, which give a most formidable charact'^r to the present movement. But it is said, '* Oh, we can easily stop this movement, and put down 9 the Chartists." No doubt it is easy to suppress any temporary acts of violence ; but Chartism cannot be put down in this way. The Legislature can only deal effectually with Chartism, by going to its source, and by removing, or mitigating, the pres- sure, which occasions it. It is an evil of a purely economical character — a social evil, — the growth of freedom, not of poli- tical abuse. It is not an evil which has arisen from bad govern- ment, or bad laws, — it would be impossible to point out any law, the removal of which would place the Working popula- tion of this country at once in a healthy state. It is to be traced clearly to the disproportion between our population and the field for the employment of labour, in spite of the thousand channels which capital and credit have opened to our industry. And not only in the humblest classes does this disproportion exist. The Church, the Bar, the Army, the Navy, Trade, all are subject to it. Every department is overstocked. There is but one prize for one hundred blanks. Profits are less — the demand for educated labour is less — for every open- ing there are twenty competitors. No man can rise above his original position in the world, and the most persevering in- dustry is often cheated of its reward. Even the wealthier portion of the community, though placed far above the reach of poverty, feel the pressure, to some extent, for their children, and connections, if not for themselves. The picture. Sir, which I have drawn, is not an exaggerated one. I have no wish to ex- aggerate it. It is a picture which no lover of his country could contemplate without deep distress, if the hopes of alleviation were limited to the confines of the British islands. Fortu- nately, however, this is not the case. There is another, and a mightier, resource available, — a resource to which I have re- ferred in my Motion, this evening. I believe this resource to be an almost inexhaustible one. And why? Because it consists in a proper disposal of the Waste lands in our Colo- niesj'and is limited only by their extent. , And what is that extent? Look at the British Colonial empire — the most mag- nificent empire that the world ever saw. The old Spanish 10 \> i boast that the sun never set in their dominions, has been more truly realised amongst ourselves ; and not only do we possess in our Colonies every poEsible variety of climate, and of soil, but the power of producing almost every article, of which our manufacturing industry stands in need. These are the trea- sures that Providence has bestowed upon us. To what account have we turned them ? How have these materials of wealth been dispensed ? Have Colonies been regarded as an integral part of the empire? — a place of refuge for thousands; who arc wasting their lives in profitless labour here ? No ; thert has been no principle, or system, or plan, in our Colonial policy, at all. Government has simply looked on the Colonies as a field for patronage, and the Legislature has regarded them as a source from which contributions to the revenue might be drawn. The Legislature had done nothing. The Government nothing. Whatever good had been achieved is due to individual enterprize, and to individual enterprize alone. But surely the land in our Colonies is intended to serve higher, and better, purposes than those, to which I have referred. What are termed the Waste lands are emphatically Public lands, the inheritance, — the patrimony of every poor man in England, Ireland, and Scotland, who pays allegiance to the Crown, — and as such I claim them. They are a trust, which the Government of this country is bound to administer for the public good; and, further, so to administer, as to afford the means of reaching the Colonies, if they desire it, to all those whose poverty, not their will, binds them to our shores. Fortunately, the attainment of this great object is attended with little difficulty. In the first place, you cannot introduce any sound, o.' equal, or practical system of deal- ing with the lands in the Colonies, without creating a revenue from them ; and, judging from the result in other countries, in which the experiment has been tiied, this revenue must be very large. Take, for instance, the United States, which are situated somewhat like ourselves in this respect. In forty-two years they have realised from this source a sum of not les^ than Seventeen wi 11 Millions sterling, while during the very poriod in which they have heen doing thi^, with inoalculahle national advantages, our Waste lands have remained Waste lands in every sense of the word. Yet the American Colonies, — for their's are Colonies as much as ours, there being no essential difference between an emigrant's going to the Back-settlements from the coast towns of the United States, and his going to Australia from England, — so far from having been retarded by what might appear to be a heavy tax, have actually flourished, not only in spite of the tax, but in fact, in consequence of it, to a degree, which is quite unprecedented in the history of the world. They have ad- vanced, by the most rapid strides, to wealth, power, and internal comfort. New towns, new States, have every where sprung up, while, on the other hand, the land in our Colonies, which has been lavishly granted for the most unwise purposes, has pro- duced no revenue, created no wealth. Our settlers are few, and full of just complaints. Sir, I cannot help thinking that this lamentable contrast in itself sufficiently bespeaks the fact, that there must be some fundamental error in the principle, on which we have proceeded. That fundamental error was pointed out some ten years ago, in a work called ** England and America," the author of which is now known to be Mr. Gibbon Wakefield ; a work, which — whether I look to the admirable clearness, with which the theory of Colonization is developed in it, the vast array of facts brought to bear upon it, or the great practical results, to which it must lead — all the offspring of one man's mind — I cannot but regard as an honour to the country, and the age. I only trust that the theory thus developed will be taken up, and acted upon by the Government of this country on a large scale, and within the shortest possible period of time. Mr. Wakefield, in *' England and America," lays it down as the first principle of Colonization, rightly understood, not to disperse labour, but to concentrate it ; to keep the population together, so as to secure for the Colony, from the first step in its career, the advantages of co-operation, and of a continuous supply of combinable 12 labour. He has shewn further, that some pressure from with- out is necessary to produce this eflfect — to check the natural tendency of every man who emigrates to a new country, from one, where people are plentiful, and land scarce, to become a proprietor of land himself, under the idea, which he carries out with him, of the value attached to land in his own country ; for- getful that land, without combinable labour to employ upon it, is of no more value than the sky above, or the sea around it. The consequence of this fallacious tendency, wherever it has been indulged, has been to isolate the settlers — to divide labour into fractional parts, — the single pair of hands of the single individual, — to prevent combination, exchange, or progress of any kind. All history, all experience prove that when once a Colony is suffered to fall into this state of stagnation, it never advances. Where there is a disper- sion of settlers, there can obviously be no co-operation, and consequently no improvement. Nova Scotia ia a proof of this, amongst our own Colonies. The Gauchos of the Pampas are another. The Spaniards there, are precisely, what their forefathers were before them, 300 years ago ; and if there are other colonies, which have not shared this fate, it is because the successors of the original settlers, being men of greater energy, and capital, have corrected the vice of their position, by having recourse to the labour of Slaves, in default of a supply of free labour, by the aid of which Slave labour, they have raised a vast amount of exchangeable produce, and created an abundant trade. This is the real history of Slavery, which, in a certain state of society, steps in to supply the place of that hired labour, which capital can always command in a country where people are plentiful, and land scarce, but which no capital can command in a country where this proportion be- tween land and people is reversed. Hence, too, it is that the Colonies of all nations have undergone, in their infancy, the curse of slavery, for even where black slavery is not practised, there is white slavery to supply its place. To this day there is white slavery in Australia, and it produces an infinitely worse 13 moral effect than the black slavery, which it has cost us twenty millions to get rid of in the West Indies. At the present mo- ment, however, but for the white slavery, which is called the Convict system, in New South Wales, that Colony would be absolutely ruined, as it has no other combinable labour at all. What is the remedy for these evils ? — ^To change the system ; — to create a sufficient check on the power of acquiring land, to secure the advantages of combined labour at once ; — to pre- vent the poor emigrant from becoming, upon his landing, a poor, and useless, landholder ; and to prevent the capitalist from surrounding himself with a desart which he has no means, or hope, of cultivating. There must be a power somewhere to give land, and a power to withhold it. In whom should this power be vestv?d? — In the Government, or the individual? Both are bad. If we vest the power in the Government, a glance at all past Colonial history shows what the result will be. If, on the other hand, it be vested in the individual, a few selfish persons, acting upon the true dog-in-the-manger principle, may take possession of a great tract of country, and shut out all other settlers from it. There must, therefore, be some estab- lished principle, some fixed rule, by which all parties are bound ; and I believe that the more this subject is investigated, the more it will be seen that there is no fixed rule so fair, so equal, so just in its operation as between man and man, as " Price." Price is the only basis on which a sound principle of Colonization, in reference to the disposal of Waste lands, can be founded. True, Price may, and will, vary according to the circumstances of each Colony ; as for instance, the price of land in the West Indies, where half an acre of land suffices to support a family in abundance, must, under any system, be more than the price of land in Canada ; but the principle is that the price of land in every instance should be a " sufficient." price to secure to every capitalist a supply of hired labour, while it holds out to the labourer the prospect of such wages, as will enable him to become in turn a capitalist himself. Upon this part of the subject I may be allowed to quote two i4 I I I I'; I jf);: I! i passages from a very able Circular addressed by the Government to the Governors oi the West Indian Colonies, in January, 1836. The circular said : — '* In order to prevent tliis, (the indisposi- tion of the Apprentices to work for hire) it will be necessary to prevent the occupation of any Crown lands, by persons not possessing a proprietary title to them, and to fix such a price upon Crown land, as may place them out of the reach of persons without capital. The natural tendency of the popula- tion to spread over the surface of the country, each man settling where he may, or roving from place to place, in pursuit of virgin soil, is thus impeded. The territory, expanding only with the pressure of population, is commensurate with the actual wants of the entire community. Society, being thus kept together, is more open to civilizing influences — more directly under the control of the government — more full of the activity, which is inspired by common wants, and the strength, which is derived from the division of labour, and altogether is in a sounder state — morally, politically, and economically — than if left to pursue its natural course." Sir, it is my conviction that these principles fairly worked out, will produce everywhere the proper proportion between laud and people, give the fullest scope to industry, and the greatest encouragement to exertion. They will secure a rapid advance, and render the Colony to which they are applied, equally attractive to the capitalist, and to the labourer, by en- suring to the one high wages, and to the other high profits, while they give to every man fair play. The field of employ- ment will be always ready to expand, but not too rapidly. If we look only to the Colony, then, leaving the Mother country out of the question, it is desirable that a price should be affixed to land ; but the interests of the Mother country are not less concerned. A price cannot be put on land, with- out producing a revenue, and this revenue, if applied in a sound way to the purposes of Emigration, affords the best Emi- gration fund that the Mother country, or the Colony, could de- sire. By securing a certain supply of labour, it encourages the capitalist in the mother country to invest capital in land, while of th th pr 15 the more land is bought, the more labour can be supplied. In> deed, in the regulations of the South Australian Colony, which is founded on the principles that I am now advocating, I find the word " price" defined to be " a contribution to the Emigration fund," and it is stated by the Commissioners as the proud dis- tinction of the Colony, that " this is the sole condition on which land can be obtained there." As to the probable amount of this Emigration fund, having no experience of our own to guide us, we must look again to the United States, and inquire what has been the system pursued there, and what the results. In the first place, I find that the right to all lands, with some exceptions in the old Atlantic states, is vested in the Federal Government by Act of Congress. That Act of Congress has been at the bottom of all the good, which the system has produced. There is one miiform price fixed of 1 4 dollar per acre — a price which has been considered too low by the economists best informed on the subject. No credit is given. There is a perfect liberty of choice, and appropriation, at this price. Immense surveys are carried on, to an extent which strangers have no conception of. 140,000,000 of acres have been mapped and planned, at a cost of 2,164,000 dollars. There is a general Land-ofliceat Washington, with forty subordinate district offices, each having a Registrar, and a Receiver, with salaries of 500 dollars, and one per cent, upon sales. Maps, plans, information of every kind, are accessible to the humblest persons. There is also the best check on the proceedings of these offices, by the means of annual reports to Congress, while at the same time every facility is given to individual enterprise. A man, if Le pleases, may invest a million of dollars in land. If he miscalculate, it is his own fault ; the public is, under any circumstances, the gainer. What has been the result of this system? Since 1795, when it was first established, the amount actually realized and paid into the Public Trea- sury has been eighty-four millions of dollars. The National debt is paid off. There is a surplus revenue to divide; — and these results are perfectly intelligible whon we look to the produce of the land sales since 1795. 16 I DOLLARS. In 1796, the proceeds were only 4,836 In 1811 . . 1,040,237 1819 . . 3,274,422 1835 . . 11,000,000 1836 , . 24,000,000 These are the pecuniary results of a system of diHposing of Waste lands by sale, fairly and honestly carried out. The moral results, if I may so term them, are equally great. The whole of the Western wilderness of America has been converted into the most thriving combination of States that the world ever saw, full of the elements of prosperity, public and private, — fast in- creasing in population, wealth, happiness, and power. How melancholy a contrast does this present to the state of things which a contrary system has produced amongst ourselves! What was the English system up to 1831, when some beneficial changes were made in it ? There was no Act of Parliament,— no responsible board, or officer, — no Land offices, — no infor- mation to be had — plenty of Surveyors in the Colonies, well paid, but no surveys, no maps or plans, — no publicity— contra- dictory regulations constantly emanating from the Government as to the disposal of land, all in force at the same time ; — the public lands, in short, were regarded as a sort of secret service fund, out of which lavish grants were made to any individual, who happened to possess political, or personal, influence at home. The whole system was a system of favour- itism, and jobbing; and, as a necessary consequence, the public derived not one shilling of advantage from all these lands, while to individual colonists the system was equally fatal. I might mention many instances of this, but I will con- tent myself with one, — the case of the Swan River. Never was there a Colony founded with more legitimate purposes, or with higher hopes. A cousin of one of the ministers of the day (Mr. Peel) was at the head of it; he took out a capital of ^50,000, which was invested in stock, seeds, agricultural labourers, and implements of various kinds. Many highly respectable indivi- duals were joined with him in the undertaking ; but all these 17 advantages were neutralized, and destroyed, by the absurd prin. ciple on which the land was then disposed of. Mr. Peel began by taking to himself a grant of half a million of acres ; the Governor took 100,000 acres, another person 80,000 ; and so an embryo right of proprietorship was spread over half the colony before a settlement oi any kind was formed. In addi- tion to these grants made in England, land was sold in the colony at 1*. 6c?. an acre; and the consequence of these con- tradictory proceedings was, that the labourers who went out with Mr Peel deserted him, and dispersed themselves over the wilderness ; the stock was destroyed, the seeds rotted on the beach, and the colony itself was only saved from starvation by- liberal supplies from the neighbouring colony of Van Diemen's Land. But in 18.31 a new system was introduced; and cer- tainly I cannot speak of that system in the presence of the Noble Lord, the member for Northumberland, without express- ing my thanks for the service which that Noble Lord has ren- dered to the cause of common sense and to the public interests, by the part he has taken in reforming the mode in which the Crown had previously disposed of the Waste or Public lands. The Noble Lord has given up a great deal of what was most exceptionable in the former system. He introduced a system of sales in the colonies. He laid down a general rule that there were to be no further grants of land in any place, to any person, of any class, whatever his influence might be, — a fair and equal principle, as far as it went. My only complaint against the Noble Lord is that his principle does not go far enough, and that even as far as it does go, it has not been honestly worked out. As to its not going far enough, the first objection to which it is open, is, that there is no gua- rantee for permanency, no stability, no act of Parliament, no responsibility; — that it is considered as mere waste paper in America; and that it is subject to be changed with every change in the Colonial Office, since it is upon the will of the ministers of the day that it is made to depend ; and, when the House reflects how many changes have occurred in this department in c 18 if m the course of only the last ten years, it will, I think, admit that any thing which is to be called a national system should not rest on so precarious a foundation. Since 1830, that is to say in nine years, there have been no fewer than seven Colonial ministers ; Sir G. Murray, Lord Goderich, the Noble Lord the Member for North Lancashire, the Right Honourable Gentleman the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Aberdeen, Lord Glenelg, and now the Marquess of Normanby; and he must be a bold man who would predict who would be Colonial minister in June 1840. Now, no two of these ministers have agreed precisely upon the application of the principle which Lord Ripon intro- duced. The Chancellor of the Exchequer, when minister for the Colonies, undid a great part of what Lord Ripon had done, but in return he gave a Charter, on very sound principles, to South Australia, which his predecessor (Lord Stanley) had refused. The first step in the Right Honourable Gentle- man's colonial career, however, was to devote a large por- tion of the funds arising from the land sales in New South Wales to colonial purposes, to colonial police, for instance, and not to immigration. Upon this subject Dr. Lang, in his excel- lent work, makes these observations: — " It was thus virtually enacted by the Secretary of State for the Colonies, that a large portion of that revenue, which had been so unexpectedly, and beneficently, created, as if by the immediate interposition of the providence of God, for the counteraction of the enormous moral evils that had resulted from the past mismanagement of the transportation system in Australia, and for ensuring the moral welfare of these Colonies in all time to come, through the impor- tation of virtuous, and industrious, free emigrant families from the mother country, and to the exclusive application of which to that object the inhabitants of New South Wales were look- ing with intense anxiety, should be applied towards the per- petual maintenance of the Colony as a mere gaol, and dunghill, for the British Empire." Sir, if this fact be true, and I am certain that it cannot be denied, I must tell the Noble Lord, the Member for North Lancashire, that I consider it a misapplica- 19 tion — a bastard application, of the principle which was sanc- tioned by him in 1831, and I feel myself entitled to call upon him to assist me in ensuring to it the fair trial which it deserves. The Noble Lord understands the principle too well not to see the absolute necessity of giving a Parliamentary sanction to it, before it can be worked out to any practical extent. He knows that the land sales must be anticipated before we can judge of their probable amount ; he knows that competition for land, if it is to produce any extensive, or beneficial, results, must not be confined to the Colony; that we must bring Englishmen, and English capital, into the field, as well as colonial capital. Be- sides, we are bound to consider the peculiar position in which our Colonies are placed. We have no backwoods, no continu- ous communication with the Colonies. We are separated from them by a great gulf, which the poor cannot pass over unless they are assisted. We must bridge it over for them ; we must give them a conveyance if we wish to take them there, and this on a sufficiently large scale to effect what is wanted, both in the colony and here. The actual produce of the land sales will not sufiice to do this, but they will serve as an ample secu- rity for any money which may be required for the purposes of emigration, so as to bring the system into practical operation at once, if we have an act of Parliament as a guarantee. What, for instance, might not the United States raise upon a branch of their revenue, which has produced four millions sterling in one year? If we wish to equal America — if we wish to give the same impetus to our population — we must adopt her system. We must pass an act of Parliament as she passed an act of Congress ; — we must create a responsible Land Board, — we must give to all classes the same advantages, and facilities, and then, but not till then, we may arrive at the same results. With an act of Parliament there will be no lack of capitalists to put the machinery in motion. The security is known, and liked, in the British money market already, and well it may be, since the whole loan is spent in adding to the value of the security. The land sales in New South Wales, though the land 20 ■ iilM is sold at a most inadequate, and insufficient, price, (d«. an acre,) while land in South Australia is selling at 205., without the aid of English competition, or an adequate supply of labour in return, have realized a very large sum. Acres, we sold 20,860 for 29,001 - 91,399 - - 271,946 - In 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 £. 6,513 - 12,528 - 28,689 - 87,097 - 105,464 £240,091. Now £240,000. would be a security for a million of money, if required as an Emigration fund, but not without the aid of Parliament. What then, is the objection to the interference of Parliament? It may be said that it is an invasion of the Prerogative of the Crown ; but the Prerogative of the Crown, in this matter, simply means [that the Crown is entrusted with the administration of the Waste lands for the public good. It is a great, and responsible, trust. It is a moral trust. And I ask the Government, and more particularly my Honourable Friend the Under Secretary for the Colonies, whether, standing in the position in which he stands in this House, he can without a blush, make himself responsible for the manner in which the Prerogative of the Crown has hitherto been used ? I ask him to look at the contrast between two cases — between the case of Canada, where the Prerogative has exercised its virtues to the fullest conceivable extent, without check, or limitation, of any kind, and the case of South Australia, where the Pre- rogative was very wisely waived. With the leave of the House — if I am not already tiring them — I will refer to those two cases more particularly. I wish that all the facts should be before the House, in order that it may the better judge of the results, which the exercise of the Prerogative will inevitably produce. The House will find in the contrast between Caijada, and South Australia, some encouragement to give extension to 21 the principles of Colonization for which I am contending. Canada was specially excluded by my Right Honourable Friend the Judge-Advocate (Sir G. Grey) from the inquiries before my Colonial Land Committee in 1836. The abuses in Canada had arisen long before my Right Honourable Friend had become connected with the Colonial administration ; and I am convinced that my Right Honourable Friend's only motive was, for the sake of the country, to prevent disclosures, which he knew must be made. Unfortunately, however, for my Right Ho- nourable Friend's views, Lord Durham's Report has since been published. Lord Durham has investigated the whole case, and has declared the result of his inquiries. There is therefore, now no hope of preventing a disclosure of the real facts, however discreditable they may be to this country in the eyes of the civilized world. And what is the inference that must be drawn from the statements of Lord Durham ? Why, that the land question is mixed up — closely and inextricably mixed up — with the whole history of our difficulties in Canada. The strongest dissatisfaction exists there with the manner in which the Prerogative has been exercised, with regard to the disposal of land. The system adopted has been one pernicious to the Colony, and useless to us. In the evidence taken before the Commission, of which my Honourable Friend the Member for Liskeard was at the head, there is nothing to be found but a tissue of peculation, jobbing, mismanagement, and favourit- ism, countenanced by all the responsible officers of the Crown, by Legislative councillors, by the Government themselves — every man, in fact, who had any influence, trying to make something out of land, to the ruin and destruction of every- body else. And what were the results ? In Upper Canada, out of 17,653,000 acres which had been surveyed, there re- main only 1,597,019 acres unappropriated, 450,000 of which are required for roads. In Lower Canada, out of 6,169,963 acres surveyed, no less than 4,600,000 have been alienated. In Nova Scotia, of 6,000,000 acres surveyed, 6,750,000 are alienated. In Prince Edward's Island, it appears from the evidence, that 1,400,000 acres were alienated in one day, in blocks of from twenty, to one hundred and fifty thousand acres. The greater part of this land has been granted to persons who have never taken possession of it at all, though, upon the true dog-in-thc-manger principle, they excluded every one else. Three millions of acres are left to this day as Clergy reserves, and Crown reserves, scattered over the whole sur- face of the Colony, and operating as a bar to all improve- ment. Not one-tenth of the land thus wantonly squandered has ever been occupied, and not one-tenth of the part occu- pied has been brought into cultivation. I find, moreover, that the whole System of surveying in Canada, has been conducted with the same reckless expenditure of means, and with the same unsatisfactory results. I find one gentleman receiving a salary of £500. a year for ten years, for super- intending the sale of 100,000 acres of wild land. All titles are doubtful in consequence of the inaccuracy of the surveys. Every duty of a Government has been badly performed, while the country has been put to an enormous expense. With respect to Emigration, of which the Noble Lord the Member for Northumberland, spoke in terms of very strong approba- tion, so far at least, as the Emigration agents are concerned , on the occasion of the discussion upon New Zealand last year, — with respect to emigration, I find Lord Durham distinctly stating in his Report, that nothing can be more inefiicient, or worse, than the system of Emigration to Canada as now con- ducted. There is great mortality in the Emigrant ships, great distress on landing, no sort of interference by the Government on behalf of the emigrants, no attempt to make provision, or give assistance, during the time that assistance is most required. The people in the interior of the Province are disptrsed, and isolated, from the want of roads. Most of the Settlers are exceedingly poor. The markets are few, and almost inaccessible. There are no schools, and the Clergy reserves fail to afford the consolations of religion to one-half of the population. The Colony is in a state of complete stagnation I and decay — The farmers are ruined by the Iubh of llieir capital through the want of communications, which they ought to have, and of the emigrants from this country not less than three-fifths have been forced to re-emigrute to the United States, who gain by our mis-management in population, and national wealth. Such is the state to which the Prerogative has reduced one of our finest Colonies — a possession, which, under happier auspices, might have been one of the most brilliant appendages of the British Crown. Wehave no means of getting over the difficulties which have been created by our own folly, but by retracing our steps. We must act upon the system, which Lord Durham has, with so much firmness and acuteness, recommended. We must impose a tax on wild land, sufficient to bring a portion of it every year into the market, by making it too dear to keep ; and we must then apply a sound principle of Colonization, and Emigration, to the Canadas, as the only way of making amends for the immense evils inflicted by the bad system pursued up to the present time. I ask my Honourable Friend, the Under Secretary for the Colonies, if he can gainsay one word of the statement which I have made, as to the system adopted in Ca- nada, by each successive Governmentfor thelast sixty years ? My Honourable Friend cannot do it. When he stands up, he must admit not only that the whole of those evils exist, but that they have been produced by the manner in which the Prerogative has been hitherto applied to the disp' >a\ of land in that Colony. But have we no example of an opposite system to look to ? Yes, we have the example of South Australia, where. the Pre- rogative of the Crown has never been allowed to interfere ; and I must now beg the attention of the House to the facts which I am about to state, respecting this Colony, as they are extremely curious. South Australia was founded on the 15th of August, 1834, by an Act of Parliament. The Commis- sioners of Crown lands wtre appointed in May 1836, and the first vessel was chartered on the 24th of March, 1836,— three years ago, — at which time South Australia was a desert, on which u a human foot had hardly eve** trod. What is its condition new ? The sales of land in South Australia up to the present time, (24th of June, 1839), were :— Acres. A, ount. 60,643 at 12*. per acre . . £36,404 88,095 at 20*. ditto . . 88,095 148,738 £124,499 These were principally sales effected in England, but the total in- cluded the sales effected in the Colony, up to the 22nd January, 1839, which amounted to 22,000^. As to Emigration from this country, it appears that 7,482 persons have gone out, in seventy- one vessels of 39,107 tons, at a cost of about 18Z. for each adult. Adding to these 900 Germans, and about 600 emigrants from the neighbouring Colonies, the total would be 8,982. The po- pulation of South Australia, therefore, is probably by this time be+waen 9,000 and 10,000 souls. In the port of Adelaide the number of vessels which entered the harbour bearing the Bri- tish flag, in 1838, was 101. The rise in the value of land in Adelaide is something perfectly incredible, but it only corre- sponds with the increase which the Colony has made in every other respect. Captain Hindmarsh, the first Governor, pur- chased two Rural Sections of 134 acres, for 80Z. each. They were sold when he was leaving the Colony for 1 ,000 guineas each. The town of Adelaide now contains 700 houses of stone, brick, wood, and pise, and about 300 mud and rush huts, according to the latest returns. Single acres in Adelaide have been sold for lOOOZ. each. The twentieth part of one of these acres, which cost originally 12*., was recently sold for 70/. Mr. John Rigge, a proprietor of the town, lets a Town acre at a rent of oOl. per annum. Others have realized higher profits on their purchases. The half of one of Cap- tain Hindmarsh's Town acres has been let at 50/. per annum, and an Honourable Friend of my own, who was amongst the earliest of the fortunate adventurers in South Australian lands, has informed me that he has just let a Town acre, for 25 which he gave I2s., in 1836, to a highly respectable, and re- sponsible tenant, at an annual rent of 100/. The ordinary profits of Sheep fai ming in the Colony are estimated at 80 per cent. Thereare two banks in Adelaide, and a third is in progress. We have now South Australian Packet ships, — a South Aus- tralian Railway Company with a capital of 95,000Z. for constructing a Railway from Adelaide to the Port, about six miles ; and in addition to the two South Australian newspapers established in the Colony, we have the South Australian Record in England, which has a circulation of 2,000 numbers every month, among those who take an interest in th_ new sources of prosperity which Colonization is opening to this country. Now, I entreat the House to contrast these facts with the Stat ments made by Lord Durham with regard to Canada a few months ago. The new principle of colonization in South Aus- tralia has been fairly tested, and the increase of the land sales in 1838, as compared with 1837, is the best proof of its sound- ness. The money realised by sales of land in the last five months of these two years was as follows : — 1837. August - - £480 September • - 160 October - - 480 November - - 560 December - - 480 Now, it is my desire to see the principles acted upon with regard to South Australia universally applied. I want to see them applied to all Colonies, in which they can be fairly brouo-ht into operation : but they can only be applied to other Colonies in the same way, namely, by an Act of Parliament. It is not a thing that Prerogative, without the interference of the Legis- lature, can do. I insist on this point the more, because it is one on which her Majesty's Ministers seem to entertain a doubt. Without an Act of Parliament the system is worthless as regards the public at large : it never can pioduce any thing hut. half measures on the part of Government, and the most unsatisfactory, 1838. £4,640 2,960 2,640 1,760 11,400 r 1 •i 26 and insufficient, results. I may be told that the question of jurisdiction is full of difficulty. No doubt it is. Difficulties may be raised, which it will require some management to meet. But the right of the Mother country is unquestionable, for the Sovereignty of a Colony is never abandoned by the parent state. It is not enough that men have been located upon one portion of a Colony, in order to have a claim over the remainder. The colonists have their rights within the limits of the settled lands, but the home government retain its original rights; and in giving a local government to those, who occupy part of the land of a Colony, it by no means follows, that the inherent rights of the Crown to deal with the Waste land which remains, is given tc them also. The right of disposing of it is not delegated to any number of settlers, or to any Colonial legislature that may be formed. But juppose there be a disputed jurisdiction : we know from Lord Durham's Report that the Colonial Legisla- tures would gladly concur in the introduction of a sound system of Colonization, in which they would have as great an advantage as the Mother country. In fact, they claim the sove- reignty over Waste lands only in the hope of preserving them from abuse, and as a security against jobbing. The present system is just as destructive to them, as to us. Th3 question of jurisdiction may therefore be very easily settled by the concur- rent action of the Imperial Parliament, and the Colonial Legis- lature, if the Government be willing to act upon any defined, and intelligible plan. We must always retain a great power over the Colonies, because they want the stream of emigration which it is in our power to direct upon them. Over emigration, at all events, the Mother country has perfect control. If Canada interpose difficulties in the way of a sound system of Coloni- zation, this country may dir^^ct its emigration to Australia. England is in fact bound to direct her emigrants to those places in which, as colonists, they will be enabled to apply their energies in the most eflfective manner, and derive from their labour the most ample reward. It is perfectly clear that we have duties as a nation to discharge towards Emigrants, whom '27 we induce, on the faith of our representations, to forsake their native land. There is one passage in Lord Durham's Report in which he lays down the full extent of the national obligations towards colonists, in the strongest terms. After speaking of the disasters to which emigrants to Canada have been exposed, Lord Durham says : — "In the report on emigration, to which I have alluded before, I find favourable mention of the principle of entrusting some parts of the conduct of emigration rather to * charitable committees' than to an ordinary department of Government. From this doctrine 1 feel bound to express my entire dissent. I can scarcely imagine any obligation which it is more incumbent on Government to fulfil, than that of guard- ing against an improper selection of emigranta, and securing to poor persons disposed to emigrate every possible facility and assistance, from the moment of their intending to leave this country to that of their comfortable establishment in the Colony. No less an obligation is incurred by the Government, when, as is now the case, they invite poor persons to emigrate by tens of thousands every year. It would, indeed, be very mischievous if the Government were to deprive emigrants of self-reliance, by doing every thing for them ; but when the State leads great numbers of people into a situation in which it is impossible that they should do well without assistance, then the obligation to assist them begins ; and it never ends, in my humble opinion, until those who have relied on the truth and paterna^ re of the Government, are placed in a situation to take care of themselves." In this doctrine I entirely concur, and I hope that whenever the question is dealt with by the Government, as it will be, and must be, eventually, this portion of the bjbject which is most important, since it relates to the well-being of thousands of humble individuals who have not the information necessary to enable them to protect themselves, will receive the most anxious, and ample, consideration. The Government, however, both in this, and in its mode of dealing with the Waste lands, has only, in my opinion, to act on a sound 28 and intelligible principle, to insure the hearty concurrence of the Colonial legislatures. I have stated in my Resolutions that a separate department would be required to take charge of the details of the plan. My Honourable Friend the Under Secretary for the Colonies will admit, that with the manifold duties which the Colonial Office has already to discharge, it would be utterly impossible to add to them a task of such magnitude. It is a task, which will require the time, and ability, of many able men. The interest, and feeling, about Emigration are now universal. That feeling the Government may guide, but cannot dam up, or control. We find now in this country what has not been seen before for the last two centuries, men of high connections, and family, interesting themselves in Colonization adventures- disposed to give up the refinements of highly-civilised life, with the dependence which is the lot of younger brothers in this country, whose energies can find no outlet in our over-crowded professions, — and prepared to carve out their own fortunes in the wilderness. Why should they not have full scope for these feelings, highly honourable, and manly, ias they are, and not only honourable to themselves, but beneficial to us ? My Honourable Friend the Under Secretary for the Colonies, and the Noble Lord the Member for Northumberland know that the Government cannot check the tide of emigration. Last year Ministers were entreated to take into their own hands the guidance of the movement, by which New Zealand is about to be colonized; and had they consented, they might have prescribed the conditions, and laid down the rules, by which all parties would have agreed to abide. They refused, however, and what is the consequence? New Zealand is colonizing itself. Enterprise and energy in this country cannot be repressed by the refusal of the Government to aid them in their attempts. Some of the first men in the kingdom are talcing part in the colonization of New Zealand, in a spirit similar to that which distinguishes the history of Maritime Adventure in 29 the reign of Elizabeth. Lord Durham is at the head of the New Zealand Land Company. Lord Petre is one of the Directors. So are the Honourable Member for Thetford (Mr. F. Baring), the Honourable Member for Hull (Mr. Hutt), the Honourable Member for Caithness (Sir G. Sinclair), the Honourable Mem- ber for Chichester (Mr. J. Abel Smith), and the Honourable Member for Sunderland (Alderman Thompson). The brother of the Honourable Member for Leeds (Sir W. Molesworth) has embarked his fortune in this Colony, together with the sons of Lord Petre and of the Member for Caithness. The feeling, which influences these gentlemen cannot be repressed, but it may be regulated, and guided by the co-operation of the Legis- lature. This New Zealand Association has sold up to this day 666 Sections, containing 67,266 acres of land, and the sale has produced within a fraction of £70,000. There is another part of our Colonial dependencies — Natal, and the South-eastern coast of Africa, with respect to which there is an absolute necessity that the Government should adopt some measures. We have had petitions presented from Glasgow, from Liverpool, from the merchants connected with the African trade in London, calling on us to deal with this question of Natal. There are still more cogent reasons for doing so. There has been a re-emigration from the Cape of 5,000 armed Boors, of the old Dutch race, who have declared themselves independent of Great Britain, and have seized a large tract of unoccupied territory, which forms the district, or country, of Natal. This re-emigration is owing as much to economical, as to political, causes. Population at the Cape is becoming cramped for room, while in the Natal country there are fifteen millions of acres of fertile, and well watered, land, unoccupied by any Native Tribes. Under these circumstances emigration in Southern Africa will go on, and the only question is, whether it shall go on uncontrolled, and under irrespoiisible guidance, or whether it shall be properly directed. This calls for the instant attention of the Government, which cannot leave matters as they are. The evils of the false, and bastard, system ao 1. ^ ff ^.:-:i on which we are now proceeding, are most acutely felt. The Honourable Member for Kent, whom 1 now see in his place, has taken great interest in the question of the Aborigines. Now both in Southern Africa, New Zealand, and the other Islands of the South Seas, the Aborigines have been the great suffbiers by the existing system of Emigration, which has inflicted upon the native inhabitants the worst evils of the worst periods of Colonization without any of the good. The scum and refuse of the population of this country are directed there, instead of the best, and most orderly. Mr. Williams, the Missionary, gives an account of one fiend, in human shape, who has taken up his abode in one of the South Sea islands. Having brought with him the arts and weapons of civilization, it is stated that he has destroyed, without risk to himself, 700 human beings during the space of four or five years. The Settlers in New Zealand have introduced muskets, gunpowder, rum, spirits, lawless habits, and whatever it is most desirable to exclude. The worst evils of civilized society are thus engrafted upon the passions of the barbarians, and the seed thus sown is pro- ducing a plentiful crop of immorality, and bloodshed. Against this I ask the friends of the Aborigines to set the establish- ment of regular intercourse, under fixed, and well ascertained, laws, and the gradual introduction of civilized habits, arts, industry, and Trade, which must be the best preparation for Christianity itself. I cannot understand that false, and mawkish, sensibility as to the state of the Aborigines, whic'^ opposes a bar to Colonization, when with proper precaution it ought to be as beneficial to them, as to ourselves. I shall be told, perhaps, that the two races will not amalgamate, but this is not true. It may be true of the Warrior tribes of North America, but there are at this day eight millions of Indians employed in Agriculture in Mexico, Columbia, and Peru. The ^- at desideratum is, to regulate upon principles of strict jus- tice he intercourse between civilized, and uncivilized, man, and to this a proper disposal of Colonial lands is the road. The rights of the Aborigines ought to be respected. The) should 31 be most carefully, and tenderly, treated, and justice should be done them in every way ; and therefore, I repeat it, they ought no longer to be left a prey to the present system of Coloni- zation, which inflicts upon them all the evils of civilization, without communicating any of the good. Why not apply this principle at once to Natal, — a country repeatedly ceded to British subjects by Chaka and Dingaan, the Zulu chiefs, — rich in pastures — admirably adapted to sheep farming, — the na- tural emporium of the Bechuana, and Interior trade, — and placed by steam communication, within four days of the Cape, — in lieu of leaving it in its present most anomalous state, an English garrison being stationed, at the present moment, at Natal, for the express purpose of excluding British ships, which are not allowed, without a special license, to enter the port ? Sir, in preaching this doctrine of Colonization, 1 do not look to any barren extension of territory ; I look to a great impulse being given to our Manufactures, and Trade — a relief from pressure here — a rapid increase in our Colonies, in consequence of that very relief, Colonial markets are the best, and least fluc- tuating, of markets for the manufactures of this country. They afford a market, which will survive the convulsions of war, or Revolution itself. Plant a colony of men imbued with English wants, tastes, habits, and feelings, upon a virgin soil, where each man can raise ten times theamount of exchangeable produce, that he could have raised at home, and you create at once the most certain demand for every article that the manufacturing in- dustry of England can supply. A very short reference to the state of our Trade with different Foreign countries as compared with our Colonial trade will prove this, the one being stationary, the other always an increasing Trade, when the Colonies have fair play, and this whether we retain our political connection with them or not. It grows with their growth, and strengthens with their strength, even where the connection with the Mother country is dissolved. Thus I find from some old returns at the Board of Trade, that the Exports from England to the United States before the war of Independence, amounted in 1762 to 32 i| In £1,667,286, and in 1773 to £2,462,148. The ruin of England was predicted when these Colonies were lost ; but how far in reality has trade suffered by their independence? In 1827, the Exports from England amounted to £7,018,'^72; in 1831, to £9,053,583; and in 1836 to £12,425,605, or to more than one-half of the value of our shipments to the whole of Europe, with a population fifteen times as great as that of the United States. Look, on the other hand, at our Trade with European countries, fluctuating as it does in consequence of political changes, and of alterations in their tariffs. To Russia, with its enormous population, our Exports in 1827 were only £1,408,970; in 1834, £1,382,300; and in 1836, £1,743,433. The Exports to other countries were — In 1827, 1836. £174,338 - £160,782 4,654,618 - 4,463,729 1,400,044 - 1,085,934 906,772 - 439,994 Compare with this the Trade with our own Colonies. The Ex- ports to the British North American Colonies were, in 1827, ^1,397,350, and in 1836, in spite of the Canadian disturbances, 362,732,291. The Exports to the West Indies were, in 1827, ^3,583,222, and in 1836, ^63, 736 ,453, notwithstanding that those Colonies have undergone the greatest social change that was ever accomplished without bloodshed. The increase of Trade with other Colonies shows something of the rapidity which marks the case of South Australia, to which I have already referred. The Exports ^\ ere — In 1827 To Prussia - - - - Germany . - . Portugal - - - Mexico & Colombia New South Wales & Van Diemen's Land - - Cape of Good Hope - - Algoa Bay alone - - ^449,892 216,558 1836. 361,180,564 482,315 55,201 in 1834 236,000, considerably exceeding the total amount of our Exports to Sweden, Norway, and Denmark in 1827, which was 36190,776, 33 and nearly equalling it in 1836, when it readied ^6284 ,079. The Exports of Van Diemen's Land have risen in twelve years from ^614,000 to ^420,000; the amount of Wool exported being in 1827, 192,075 lbs., and in 1835, l,948,800lbs. The Exports of New South Wales were, in 1828, £84,008, and in 1836, £513,976 ; the quantity of Wool in 1828 being 138,498 lbs., and in 1836, 5,240,090lbs. Sir, these facts are my case. I have now done with details. There are some people, indeed, who say we don't want to ex- tend our Colonies — we have " Colonies enough." I ask in return, have we markets enough? Have we employment enough? Are wages high enough, and profits high enough? Is there no political discontent — no physical suffering? Yet the National Petition, with its twelve hundred thousand signa- tures, stands for discussion to-night ; a petition which, as I began by proving, is at once the child, and the emblem, of national distress. That distress may be overcome, but not by refusing to look the danger in the face. Our Trade is diminish- ing — our Exports are changing their character — Foreign compe- tition is growing up. Is it not desirable, and wise, to open a safety-valve in time ? I believe that the most effectual remedy will be found in the Resolutions which I have laid upon the table of the House. I believe that they will tend to promote the welfare of many millions of human beings, and to enlarge the Sovereignty of the British Crown. The Government is not called upon to incur any risk in order to make the attempt, but simply to lay down sound principles, which individual energy, and enterprise, will work out. If I am asked what is to be the result of such an experiment, I say the creation of new communi- ties, in which the laws, the language, and the virtues of England will be preserved long after the ties, which connect them with the Mother country are dissolved. As to our future hold upon these communities, we may let futurity take care of itself. It is enough for us to know that, in the plan proposed, there is neither cost, nor outlay, nor risk ; while if it succeeds—and it will suc- ceed — if we have the wisdom to let our Colonies govern them- 34 selves, we may have nioi'e people in the Colonies, and more people at home, and all better olF. I hope there will be no lurking indisposition on the part of the Government to entertain the question fairly, in all its comju'ehensive bearings ; and I trust that my Honourable Friend, the Under Secretary of the Colonics, will not, by comujitting himself ngainst it, shut him- self out from the greatest career of practical utility, that has ever been opened to an English statesman at a most critical time. With these feelings. Sir, I beg leave to move the following Resolutions : — 1. That the occupation, and cultivation, of Waste lands in the Bi'itish Colonies, by means of Emigration, tend to improve the condition of all the industrious classes in the United Kingdom, by diminishing competition for employment at home, in conse- quence of the removal of superabundant numbers, creating new markets, and increasing the demand for Shipping and Manu- factures. 2. That the prosperity of Colonies, and the progress of Colo- nization, mainly depend upon the manner, in which a right of private property in the Waste lands of a Cohmy may be acquired ; and that, amidst the great variety of methods of disposing of Waste lands which have been pursued by the British Govern- ment, the most effectual, beyond all comparison, is the plan of Sale, at a fixed, uniform, and " sufficient" price, for ready money, without any other condition, or restriction ; and the em- ployment of the whole, or a large fixed proportion, of the pur- chase-money, in affording a passage to the Colony, cost free, to young persons of the labouring class, in an equal proportion of the sexes. 3. That in order to derive the greatest possible advantage from this method of Colonizing, it is essential that the perma- nence of the system should be secured by the Legislature, and that its administration should be intrusted to a distinct subor- dinate branch of the Colonial Department, authorised to sell Colonial lands in this country ; to anticipate the sales of land 35 by raising loans for Emigration, on the security of future land sales, and generally to superintend the arrangements by which the comfort and well-being of the Emigrants are to be secured. 4. That this method of Colonizing has been applied by the Legislature to the new Colony of South Australia with very remarkable, and gratifying, results, and that it is expedient that Parliament should extend the South Australian system to all other Colonies which are suited to its operation. SIR WILLIAM MOLESWORTH. — In seconding the motion of my Honourable Friend, I need not, after his able speech, enter into any lengthened discussion of the principles, upon which his motion is founded. My Honourable Friend proposes, first, that in every one of the colonies a certain price shall be affixed to its waste lands, that price to vary according to the circumstances of each colony ; and, secondly, that the net proceeds of the land-sales shall constitute an emigration fund, each colony to be furnished with emigrant labour in pro- portion to its own land-sales. The object of these regulations is first, by a fixed price to put an end to the favouritism and other abuses, which have always resulted, and must, in my opinion, necessarily result from any system of free or conditional grants of land. Secondly, the fixed price ought to be a considerable one, in order to prevent individuals from acquiring large tracts of land, without any intention to cultivate them, and merely in the hope, that, at some future period, they may become valu- able by the increase of wealth and population. And here I may remark, that all experience and reason have shown, that such excessive appropriations are most injurious to a new community, by interposing deserts, and cutting off com- munication between its cultivated parts. And, lastly, the object of employing, in the promotion of emigration, the funds raised from the sale of land, is to afford a profitable field of employ- ment for the surplus population of this country, and to provide the purchasers of colonial land with a steady supply of labour, wherewith to render their land productive, and worth the price d2 30. put Upon It. For land, without labour to cultivate it, is worth- less. It is evident indeed that a few half sterile acres in this densely peopled country are, on account of the facility of obtaining hired labour, far more valuable than millions of the most fertile acres in a place, where no labourei's can be obtained to reap .he fruits of the soil. Now, if the regulations of my Honourable Friend be adopted, the purchasers of colonial land would not merely purchase a certain number of acres, but would indirectly buy the services of a number of labourers proportioned to the amount of land bought. As the chief object of putting a considerable price on waste land is to obtain a supply of labour, it is evident that the price of waste land ought to be so high, as to ensure a sufficient sup- ply of labour to cultivate the appropriated land in the most ad- vantageous manner; that is, to raise from it the greatest amount of produce compared to the number of hands employed :'for in that case wages and profits would be high, and the community flourishing. For this purpose the price of land in each colony should be such, as, firsts to produce a fund sufficient to convey to the colony the number of labourers required ; and, secondly, to prevent the labourers, so conveyed, from passing from the state of labourers to that of land-owners, before their place can be supplied by fresh immigrants. These are the objects of the motion of my Honourable Friend. They are founded upon the self-evident fact, that land, without labour to cultivate it, is worthless. My Honourable Friend therefore proposes to make the waste lands of ihe colonies valuable, by making them the means of conveying labour to the colonies. My Honourable Friend's motion is likewise founded upon the now acknowledged fact, that individuals (particularly from this country) will not labour for hire, when they can easily bacome independent landowners, even though their pecuniary gains as petty landowners be much less, than the wages they could earn as labourers. Therefore, if the price of waste land in a colony be very low, emigrant labourers too rapidly pass from the condition of labourers to that of landowners, and steady labour for hire is unattainable; consequently in a colony ar IS g Bocircurastanced there would be very little or no combination of labour, no division of employment, no extensive branches of in- dustry, and no profitable investment for capital; and this com- bination ofcircumstances-n'ould ultimately occasion a cessation of any demand for labour, consequently wages and profits would be low, and the community poor and half civilized. The history of colonization offers but too many instances of such a result having been brought about by an excessive facility of acquiring land. On this account, my Honourable Friend proposes to render the acquisition of waste lands difHcult, by putting a considerable price upon them. In support of this plan I must observe, that experience has shown that, (except when accidental circumstances have ob- structed in some considerable degree the appropriation of waste land) the only colonies, in which there have been from their commencement combinable labour and extensive production, and which have rapidly increased in wealth, have been colonies, in which slavery, in some shape or other, has been established; such, for instance, as that of the negroes in the southern states of Amnrica, and in our own West Indian colonies ; of inden- tured labourers in the early times of Pennsylvania, and of con- victs in the penal colonies of Australia. As far ul production is concerned, the effects of \he plan of my Honourable Friend would be the same as those of slavery; namely, it would ensure the existence of combinable labour, of extended and profitable production, and of wealth. The moral means by which this result would be brought about, would be far different from those of slavery. Under slavery, the labourer is directly compelled to toil by the lash, without any prospect of bettering his con- dition. Under the plan of my Honourable Friend, the labourer would be indirectly compelled by the price of land to sell his labour, during a certain time, for high wages, with a hope, however, of ultimately not only acquiring landed property, but likewise of becoming an employer of labour himself: and this hope he could not entertain, were the price of land so low that, in a short period of time, the mere emigrant labourer could ac- quire a sufficient amount of land to maintain himself upon. 38 I will not, after the able exposition of my Honourable Friend, enter into any further discussion of the principler upon which his motion is founded. Though but recently discovered, the justice of those principles have been acknowledged by most persons, well versed in the science of political economy. They were first put forth about the year 1829 by my friend, Mr. Wakefield, to whom, as my Honourable Friend^ the Member for Sheflfteld most justly observed, the great merit of their discovery is exclusively due. In 1833 they v ore fully d'iveloped, in an admirable work of Mr. Wakefield's, called " England and America." The preceding year they had been partially adopted by the Colonial Office, in certain regulations, known by the name of Lord Howick's Regulations, to the utility of which, as far as they went, ample testimony has been borne. In 1833, they were embodied in the Act for creating the colony of South Australia, and they constitute the basis of that rapidly flourish- ing comr^ unity. lu 1836, Ihey were distinctly recognized by Lord Glenelg in a circular addressed to the West Indian colonies, but unfortunately for the industry of those colonies, they have since that period been entirely overlooked. In the same year they were carefully investigated and approved of by a committee of the House of Commons, of which my Honourable Friend, the Member for Sheffield, was the chairman. Last year they were fully confirmed by the numerous and intelligent witnesses examined before the Transportation committee. They form no inconsiderable and by no means the least valuable portion of Lord Durham's report on Canada. My Honourable Friend, the Member for Liskeard, (Mr. C. Buller) has adopted thjm in his able report on the waste lands of the North American co- lonies. And, lastly, within a few weeks, a company with a capital of £250,000, has been established on these very prin- ciples, to colonize New Zealand. Ths facts, which I have just stated, show how carefully the principles contained in the reso- lutions of my Honourable Friend hpve been examined, and how highly they have been approved of by shrewd and intelligent men. 29 1 will now, with the permission cf the House, attempt to comply with tlie wish of my Honourable Friend. My Honour- able Friend has requested me, as having paid much attention, to the affairs of the penal colonies of Australia, and having; been chairman of the Transportation c< mmittee to show to how great and important an extent the priuciples, upon which his measure is founded, are immediately applicable to New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land. For that purpose 1 must first make a few remarks with regard to the history of the industry and pro- ductions of those colonies. The House is aware, that the colony of New South Wales was founded in 1788, as a place of punishment for criminals. For many years after its commencement it was inhabited almost entirely by convicts, their superintendants, and the soldiers ap- pointed to guard the prisoners. The first persons, who acquired landed property in that colony, were some officers in the regi- ments quartered there ; some convicts, the period of whose sentences had expired ; and a very few emigrants. To these persons the government made grants of land, frequently on the condition that they should maintain a certain number of con- victs, xhese convicts became the servants, or rather the slaves of the settlers ; for they were subjected to iiagellation auu other punishments for neglect of work. They were employed by their masters in cultivating the land, from which they raised a surplus produce. For that surplus prodace the government and convict establishments afforded a most excellent market. By these means, and by others of not so creditable a description, the first settlers rapidly made mont^y ; they obtained more land, and more convict servants, and accumulated capital: emigrants arrived from this country, and the colony appeared to be most flourishing. The history of the industry of Van Diemen's Land is nearly the same as that of New South Wales. It was first settled in 1803, as a dependency of New South Wales, and in 1825 was made independent of that colony ; it is indebted for its wealth to the slave labour of transported convicts, and to the large sums expended on it ])y this country. 40 In proof of the rapid progress of these colonies in producfion and commerce, I will read to the House a few facts which I have collected from Parliamentary returns. The House is aware, that wool is the staple produce of Aus- tralia. The sheep are chiefly of the Merino breed, with a sliglit cross of those from Bengal and the Cape of Good Hope. Their fleeces are of the finest quality, averaging about two and a hpjf pounds weight, and worth from one to three shillings u pound. In 1796, the number of sheep in New South Wales wasouly 1,631 ; during the next year. Captain M* Ar- thur (a name which will ever be celebrated in the industrial history of that colony), obtained three rams and four ewes of the Merino breed. He applied himself to the rearing of fine- wooled sheep; he obtained at different times considerable grauis of land from the government (in all, 18,000 acres), and a number of convicts as shepherds. His flocks were the best in the colony, and to his exertions in no small degree is to be attributed the »t*aordinary success of this branch of industry in Australia. About the beginning of this century the number of fheep, in New South Wales, amoanted only to 6,757; in 1821 they were estimated at 120,000; in 1830 they had reached 500,000 ; in 1834 they were not less than one million ; and now they probably exceed three millions. The first return, that I am able to find, of the quantity of wool exported from New South Wales, is for the year 1807 ; it amounted only to 245ibs. ; in 1815 it had increased to 32,000lbs. ; in 1820 to 100,0001bs. ; in 1828 to 834, OOlbs ; and in the same year from the two colonies of New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land 1,574,000 lbs. were exported. Since 1828 the quantity of wool received from those colonies hap increased fivefold ; last year it amounted nearly to 8,000,000 of pounds weight, the value of which could not have been less than £600,000, probably somewhat more. Thus the Australian colonics, which at the commencement of the century did not export a single pound weight of wool, now supplies us with about one-seventh of the whole quantity of wool im- ported. And I feel persuaded that in less than another half 41 century, if those colonies be properly managed, our commerce} with them in wool alone will exceed our whole trade in that commodity at the present moment. There is known to be, in Australia, an all but indefinite amount of the finest pasturage lands ; on these lands, flocks of sheep, with proper care, will double themselves in every two or three years ; all that is wanted is a sufficient amount of labour, and how, by adopting the principles of my Honourable Friend, that amount of labour can be obtained, I will presently show. First, however, I will state some other facts with reference to the progress of the industry of the penal colonies. The value of the fisheries of Australia has increased with great rapidity. They consist chiefly in the pursuit of the black and sperm whales. — In 1828 they produced about £38,000; seven years after- v:cH '■). 1835, they had increased nearly sixfold, to £214,000. The value of the exports from New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land in 1828 did not exceed £181,000; in 1836 they amounted to £1,168,000, or about £15 a head for every free person. The value of the imports into those colonies in 1828 was £811,000; in 1836, it had more than doubled, being about £1,795,000, or £23 a head for every free person. The shipping of these colonies has likewise doubled during the last eight years. The number of vessels entered inwards in 1828 was 268, with a tonnage of 66,000 tons; in 1836 the number of vessels er^'^'od inwards was 661, with a tonnage of 124,000 tons. In i"'. he number of vessels entered outwards was 202, with a x..nrj^-e of 44,000 tons ; in 1836 the number of vessels entered outwards was 641, with a tonnage of 116,000 tons. Comparing the trade, revenue, and expenditure of the penal colonies with those of the United Kingdom, I find that, in proportion to their respective populations, the exports of the penal C'Onies, are seve:i times, the imports ten times, the revenu ; twice, and the expenditure one and a half times, as great as rliose of the United Kingdom. For the purpose of showing the great commercial importance ifi l!M It/ ll'.: , 'it; 42 of these colonies, and their value to this country, as compared with other portions of our colonial empire, I have instituted a comparison between their trade, and that of the larger of our other colonies. 1 find that in 1836 the commerce (including under that term the sum of the exports and imports) of this country with the penal colonies, whose population did not then exceed 125,000 persons (convicts as well as free), was equal to four-fifths of our commerce with the two Canadas, containing a populatior of one million ; to three- fourths of our commerce with Jamaica, containing a population of 361,000; to nearly double that with the Mauritius, and to one-third of that with our Indian empire. The extent of the market of colon, j >» the products of the industry of this country may be inferred ora the fact, that in 1836 the exports of British produce and manufactures to New 3outh Wales and Van Diemen's Land were equal in value to about one-eighth of the whole of our exports to the colonial empire, whose population was nearly one hundred millions; to two-fifths of the exports to the North American colonies ; to three-sevenths of the exports to India ; they were nearly equal to the exports to the West Indian colonies, both insular and continental ; and were four times as great as those to the Mauritius. And, lastly, I must state as a proof of the wealth of these colonies, that in the immediate vicinity of Sydney the value of land is from £100 to £1,000 an acre ; and in Sydney itself it has been sold at the rate of £10,000 an acre. I wish to direct the attention of the House to the facts I have just stated, in order to impress the House with the importance of the subject which I am now about to discuss; namely, the causes which threaten the industry of these colonies, and the necessity of adopting the principles of my Honourable Friend, in order to provide them with the supply of labour, requisite to maintain them in their present state. I have already remarked, that the rapid progress of these colonies is to be attributed, not to the circumstance that the government has furnished the settlers with land free of expense; 43 but that it has provided them with the combinable labour which renders that land productive, and which consists in con- vict slaves, transported at the cost of this coun. y; and in addition to this, that the government has created an excellent market in the fivrm of convict, military, and civil establish- ments, paid for out of the British estimates. Since the com- mencement of the two colonies, the government has granted away nearly seven millions of acres, only a trifling portion of which, and that during the last three or four years, has been paid for. About 110,000 convicts have been transported, most of whom have been assigned as labourers ; at the present mo- ment there are probably between 30,000 and 40,000 convicts in private service. The amount of British funds, expended upon these colonies since 1786, was estimated by the Transpor- tation committee to have been at least eight millions of pounds sterling ; the sum defrayed out of the public purse for these colonies, in 1837, was £461,000, having increased from £354,000 in 1831. These were the elements of the wealth of the penal colonies ; namely, land well adapted to the growth of wool and other produce ; a steady market at hand ; and a constant and abundant supply of labour. As long as a suffi- cient supply of labour can be obtained, so long will these colonies prosper; and this brings me to the consideration of the present state of the Australian colonies, and to the defi- ciency of the supply of labour which exists at present and will augment, unless means be taken of providing those colonies with labour from other sources than from the gaols of this country, which have of late become inadequate. During the earlier period of thepj colonies the supply of convict labour exceeded the demand, and the government granted various indulgences to the settlers, who would take convicts under their charge. At a subsequent period the sup- ply of convict labour only equalled the demand ; then there was no difficulty in disposing of convicts, and the strange system of confiding the punishment of offenders to the discretion of private individuals (called the assignment system) acquired its 44 :''! full extension. At present the supply of convict labour is much less than the demand ; and the competition for labourers is very great. New South Wales, especially, is suffering from this cause. The flocks of sheep, from the want of shepherds, are twice the size they ought to be ; numbers of sheep perish for want of care; and many proprietors, I have been informed, have been obliged to destroy their lambs. It was estimated last year, that no less than ten thousand labourers were re- quired for that colony alone. Every arrival of late from 'New South Wales has brought complaints of the want of labour. The diminution in the general and in the land revenue last year may in some degree be attributed to this cause, the effects of which will every year become more striking, unless vigorous measures be adopted to remove the disproportion now existing between the demand for, and the supply of labour. That disproportion is the result of a variety of causes ; first, of the great increase c'' cupital to which I have already referred ; and which has occasioned a great increase in the demand for labour, in order to render that capital productive. Secondly, the deficiency of labour may be partly attributed to the manner in which the Australian colonies have been peopled ; namely, chiefly by convicts, with a very unequal proportion of the (wo sexes. Population has, in consequence, increased very slowly ; as the convicts who die rarely leave behind them children to supply their places. The fresh importations of convicts does little more than fill up the void occasioned by deaths, and by the secession of convicts from the class of labourers. Thus the transportation of convicts does not actually afford any additional supply of labour to the settlers in New South Wales, nor enable them to extend their field of production, in pro- portion to the extension of their capital. Thirdly, the employment of criminals as labourers has made various descriptions of labour discreditable for persons who have not been convicted. The free emigrants, who of late years have arrived in New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land, are there- fore disinclined to adopt occupations similar to those performed 45 by convicts ; they are unwilling to labour in company, and thus to confound themselves with criminals under punishment. Precisely the same feelings act upon free persons in the penal colonies as operate upon the white population in the southern states of America, and which make it disgraceful for a white man, and cause him to be stigmatised as a mean white, if he consent to work in those kinds of industry which are the usual employments of the black race. And, lastly, this disinclination to labour for another is strengthened in the Australian colonies by the facility with which land can be obtained. For the price of land is so low that any person, who has obtained a small sum of money, can set up for himself; and even the mere emigrant labourer can in a short time, by the savings from his high wages, become the independent proprietor of a small plot of land. These are the main causes of the disproportion between the supply of, and the demand for labour in New South Wales. In Van Diemen's Land the same causes do not operate to the same extent ; because the territory of that colony is compara- tively limited, and most of the fertile land is already occupied. In Van Diemen's Land, therefore, the yearly importation of convicts from this country is nearly sufficient for the labour market of that colony. In New South Wales this is not the case. If however that source of labour be cut off, without new channels of supply being opened, the want of labour would be most intensely felt in both colonies. Now I feel convinced, that no government can long permit the existence of the present system of transportation. The employment of convicts as slaves (that is the assignment system), has been condemned by every authority, as a most unequal and improper punishment. It was allowed, even by those most interested in the economical prosperity of the penal colonies, to be the source of innumerable and ir calculable moral evils ; and to have produced communities, as depraved as they are wealthy ; in both respects without parallel in the world. Its discontinuance .has been recommended by the Noble Lord the Member for Stroud (Lord John Russell), 46 'i' i n ,1 and by the late Secretary of State for the Colonies (Lord Glenelg). Orders have been transmitted to the governors of these colonies to the effect that no more convicts shall be assigned to settlers. Whether or not convicts should conti- nue to be sent to these colonies to be punished in gaols or penitentiaries is (though in itself a question of great impor- tance) one that I will not now discuss. I shall call the attention of the House to this subject on a future, and I trust early occasion, when I shall bring under the consideration of the House the report and resolutions of the Transportation Com- mittee. It is the continuance or discontinuance of convict slavery ; that is, of the assignment system, which affects the pecuniary interests of the penal colonies. The colonists want convicts to rear their flocks, and till their fields, and for no other purposes. Their present prosperity will vanish if they be deprived of their present s'^pply of convict labour, unless they obtain labour from some other source. They will cease to flourish, especially in New South Wales, even if they retain the present supply of convict labour, unless an additional quantity of labour be procured from other quarters. How, I ask, can such a supply of labour be obtained, as will compensate for the abolition of transportation, or at least of the assignment system, and will furnish a regularly increasing amount of labour in proportion to the increase of the field of production ? So severely was the want of labour felt in New South Wales, that it was proposed to import Hindoos, as inden- tured labourers, who were to be returned to their native country, at the end of a certain period of time. With regard to this plan, I must observe, that experience has fully shown, that it is impossible to enforce bonds of indenture without a system of punishment, that would make the indentured labourer almost a slave. It has generally happened, when the indentured labourer was of the same race as his master, and equal to him in intel- ligence, that he has broken his indenture and sold his labour to the highest bidder for it. On the other hand, when the labourer was of an inferior race, he was first entrapped, and subsequently reduced by his master to a state of bondage. 47 Now, every one, wlio is aware of the ignorance and helplessness of tlie Hill-coolies (the particular cast of Hindoos proposed to be imported as indentured labourers), must at once perceive, that this mode of supplying New South Wales with labour would, in reality, establish a species of slavery in that colony. The Colonial Office has, therefore, very properly refused to assent to such a proceeding. Moreover, if the indentured labourers were to be ultimately sent back to their own country, the importation of a few thousand Hindoos annually would be a mere temporary expedient, wholly inadequate to that extension of industry of which New South Wales is capable. On the other hand, if they were permanently to settle in the colony, they would form a separate class, distinct in colour, language, and religion; and a state of society would ensue, such as, I think, no statesman would desire to produce in Australia, after the ample experience, which we have had, of the pernicious consequences of a similar state of society in our West Indian colonies and in the Southern States of America. Emigration from this country is, therefore, the only source from which labour can be advantageously supplied to New South V'^ales. But here several difficult questions arise. If transportation continue, the emigration of free labourers to the same place, where criminals are sent to be punished, is most ob- jectionable ; first, because it would destroy a great portion of the terrors of transportation, inasmuch as the condition of a labourer in the penal colony is represented to be better than that of one in this country ; and the mere banishment, which is generally considered to be the greater portion of the punishment, would in consequence be considered rather in the light of a benefit than of an evil. Secondly, because transportation has produced, and tends to perpetuate, in the penal colonies, a state of morality worse than that of any other community in the world. This has been amply proved by the Report of the Transportation Committee. I entertain, therefore, the most serious doubts whether the Government is morally justified in encouraging the ipdustrious classes of this country in emigrating to a community, 48 ■.{': < f. ■I i I It where it is all but certain that their moral principles will be subverted by association with the criminals, who are compelled to accompany them. To send 5,000 criminals and as many free emigrants to labour together in the same place is an anomaly in legislation, in defence of which no arguments of any validity can be urged. If transportation continue, it would be far better to circumscribe the penal colonies, to allow none but offender? to dwell in them, and to make them nothing else than large gaols, such as was the condition of Van Diemen's Land under Sir George Arthur. New South Wales should then be limited to the territory which is now occupied. And the remainder of it, especially Port Philip, and the surrounding district of most fertile land, called Australia Felix, should be established into a new colony, untainted by convicts, and inhabited only by free, industrious, and intelligent emigrants. Such a colony would in a short time afford a market for the productions of this country, and a commerce, as extensive as those of the present penal colonies. It is true the penal colonies would still be the sinks of iniquity and vice they now are ; they would not become worse; that is impossible. They would not, however, contami- nate the whole of that vast and fertile district, which at present is included within the boundaries of New South Wales. Un- doubtedly this proposition is one highly injurious to the interests of the free settlers of New South Wales. But it is the only alternative which, in my opinion, the continuance of trans- portation permits. Some of the inhabitants of New South Wales claim a vested interest in the labour of the criminals of this country ; if so, they must take it with all its consequences. They have selected a gaol as their abode, they must submit to its inconveniences and sufferings. They have chosen to dwell amongst offenders, they must not expect that the legislature will encourage, or even permit innocent men to become their compa- nions. For I consider the legislature to be equally bound to guard over the moral, as well as the economical interests of its subjects. It ought to prevent those, over whom it exercises authority, from sacrificing their dearer and more important, though 49 remoter, interests, for the sake of some minor, though immediate, advantage ; especially when such persons are liable to act in ignorance, as is the case with the greater portion of the emigrant labourers. I myself cannot conceive how any virtuous, any high-minded man, any person in whom the desire of pecuniary gain has not obliterated every other and better feeling, can consent to become an inmate of these colonies, if transportation continue, unless under the most erroneous impressions of the consequences of that system of punishment. Indeed, I feel firmly convinced that, with the continuance of transportation, all the better portion of the inhabitants of these colonies, and of the emigrants, will remove to the other Australian commu- nities, that are now springing up, where similar descriptions of industry are carried on, where a better state of society exists, and where free institutions will soon be established, which can never be the case in the penal colonies, as longs as convicts are transported. Sir, if transportation be abolished, I see no obvious difficulty in maintaining the present economical prosperity of these colonies, and in purifying them. The motion of my Honourable Friend points out the means ; all that is required is the incli- nation and the determination on the part of the Government vigorously to adopt those means. In order that New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land mav continue in their career of wealth, the place of the thirty or lorty thousand convicts, who are now labourers in the penal colonies, must be supplied by a similar number of free labourers. And here I must remark, that 40,000 free men will produce far more than 40,000 convicts ; for there was no fact better established before the Transportation Committee, than that, even at the present high rate of wages, free labour, when it can be obtained, is more profitable to its employer than the com- pulsory labour of unpaid convicts. And, likewise, I should observe, that the whole of this amount of labour would not be required at once ; for a certain period of time must elapse before the whole of the convicts, who are now employed as labourers, £ 50 I, i J r can be withdrawn from private service, or could become free by the expiration of their terms of punishment. This period should, in my opinion, not exceed four or five years; after which no persons should be permitted to be owners of convict labourers. In addition to these circumstances, it should be remarked that a considerable portion of the now convicts would, on becoming free, become labourers. It is therefore evident, that the emigration, during the next four or five years, of 40,000 labourers would fully compensate for the abolition of transpor- tation. But, as I have already observed, the present supply of convict labour is insufficient for the demand for labour in New South Wales ; therefore some additional free emigration would be required for that colony, in order to prevent any check to the progress of its industry. It is all but impossible accurately to calculate what that additional emigration ought to be. I feel persuaded that, if these colonies were provided during the next four or five years with 100,000 emigrants, of equal pro- portions of men and women, not only would the cessation of the assignment system, and of the supply of convicts from this country, not be felt on the industry of these communities ; but they would be amply furnished with labour, and with a popu- laiion which, unlike the preset one, would rapidly increase. So far with regard to the effects of such an amount of emigration on the industry and production of these colonies. Its moral effects would be still more striking. Whereas at present, with a small free emigration, a considerable transportation of convicts demoralises the free emigrants, and is a perennial source of vice ; a large free emigration and no transportation would soon swamp the remainder of the convict population, and establish a new standard of morality. At the last census, in 1836, the population of these colonies consisted of 120,000 persons, half of whom were, or had been, convicts. Now, it is no exaggeration to suppose, that if 100,000 emigrants were carried out free of expense during the next five years, what with those who would emigrate at their own expense, and with births, the population of these colonies would at the end of that 51 period be not less than 300,000 souls, of whom not more than one-seventh, or between forty and fifty thousand would have been convicts. This result, the House must acknowledge, would be a most desirable one ; the permanent prosperity of these colonies would be insured ; an increasing trade witli this country would be certain ; and their population would be constituted of such materials, as would fit them for receiving those free insti- tutions and that self-government, without which good colonial government is impossible. It will be asked, what would \^e the cost of such an amount of emigration, and how could the money be raised ? Twenty pounds a head would, under a proper system of management, more than cover the expenses of passage, of salaries to the agents of emigration, and of all incidental expenditure. For I find tha t the cost to the Government for the passage of convicts to the penal colonies was between thirteen and fourteen pounds a hnd in 1836. Seventeen pounds a head were allowed 1); the G iment to the Committee for Female Emigration to Aus- truua ; and that committee contracted with their own secretary, Mr. John Marshall, to procure women and convey them to Australia for sixteen pounds a head, out of which he is said to have made a very large profit. According to the Commis- sioners of Colonization for South Australia, the whole cost of emigration to that colony was about eighteen pounds for every adult. For these reasons it appears to me that twenty pounds a head would be more than sufficient to defray all the expenses of rhe emigration, which I have proposed. At this rate two millions would be required for the emigration of one hundred thousand persons ; and this sum, spread over a period of four or five years, would amount to between four or five hundred thousand pounds a year for the next four or five years. How can this sum be raised? I think, if it were necessary, that a good case could be made out for calling upon this country to contribute a portion of the money, in consideration of the evils which it has inflicted upon these colonies, by making them an abode of criminals; and in consideration of the enormous 62 lu ft! 4 'll extension of commerce) which such an emigration would un- doubtedly occasion. It is not, however, in my opinion, in any way necessary that there should be any call upon the public purse for this object. The resources of :hese colonies are amply sufiicient for the purpose of carrying on that amount of emi- gration. The <*um required might easily be raised on the security of the salts of waste lands. In proof thereof, I wish to cail the atteniio.1 of the House to the amount of the sales of waste land in the penal colonies. In 1832 the system commenced of selling waste land at the upset price of 5s. an acre; in that year £27,000 were raised from the sale of land ; in 1833, £33,000 were obtained; in 1834, £48,000; in 1835, £104,000; in 1836, £160,000. I'his large sum has been raised at the upset price of five shil- ?'ngs an acre ; a price universally acknowledged to be far too low ; in consequence this year the govern'.ient has raised the price of land to 12*. an acre. I believe that £1. an acre, the price recommended by the Transportationcommittee, would not be too high. For the fixt^d price of land in the neighbouring colony of South Australia is £1 . an acre, and it appears from a statement, with which the colonization commissioners of South Australia have ftivoured me, that that price has not been found to be exorbitant. Since the commencement of that colony in 1836, the commissioners have sold 133,195 acres; the first 58,995 a*:res at 12*. an acre, the remainder at £1. an a^re; they have received for the sales of land £109,597 ; they have sent out 7,115 emigrants in 66 vessels, containing 36,294 tons; the whole air.ount of population is not known, but I believe, what from births and from the emigration from the other Aus- tralian colonies, it is not at present less than 10,000 souls. In October last the number of sheep and lambs were 22,500, and of horned cattle 2,176. The future sales of land this year, taking as a guide the land which has been sold since the com- mencement of 1839, are estimated at not less than 6,000 acre:^ a month, and the number of emigram,!) this year will be more than 5,000 persons. These facts, I think, cannot fail to pro- If 53 duce the conviction, that ^1. an acre is by no means too high a price foi the wealthy communities of New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land. At this price the land revenue of the penal cplonies would greatly increase, if it be entirely em- ployed ir, emigration. At the present moment the sale of land is limited by the deficiency of labour, arising partly from the small emigration ; for only an inconsiderable portion of the existing ' — \ fund has been devoted to emigration; and partly from the low price of land, which has tempted many of the emigrants immediatply to become small proprietors. Now; if there were the security of an act of Parliament that the price of land would not be lowered, as might be the case, according to the whim and caprice of every honourable gentleman who becomes Colonial Secretary ; if the regulations of my Honour- able Friend were confirmed by the Legislature; and if a facility be given to the disposal in this country of colonial lands by the sale of land warrants ; I am convinced that I do not exag- gerate, when I suppose that, with an emigration of 20,000 per- sons annually, and with a price on waste lands from 12s. to £^, an acre, the land revenue would soon increase from ^160,000, the amount in 1836, to above £200,000 a-year. Therefore, I conceive that upon thi> security of thoee sales a sum of two mil- lions could easily be raised, at less than the colonial rate of in- terest, namelv, 10 per cent. ; still more easily could the sum of four or five hundred thousand pounds be raised every year for the next four or five vears, at the same rate of interest. But this amount of interest would be excessive, and would put the colony to an unnecessary expense. If the government would guarantee a loan, it is evident that the sum of two millions could be raised at a very small premium on the rate of govern- ment securities, say between three and a half and four per cent. : at this rate the interest upon the loan of two millions would be between seventy-five and eighty thousand pounds, or about one- half of the amount of the land revenue of these colonies in 1836; leaving, therefore, even if the land revenue did not in- crease?! (an e2:travag..iit supposition), a considerable sum for 64 gradually paying off the debt. I think the House must per- ceive that in every one of these statements I have put the cost of emigration, the number of emigrants required, and the ex- pense of the loan at the highest amount. I am, therefore, warranted in concluding that there would be no difficulty in carrying into effect the plan I have proposed. This plan is the result of much and careful consideration on my part. It has unexpectedly received the strongest confirmation of which it is susceptible. I have within a few days obtained from New South Wales the report of the Committee of the Legislative Council on emigration, which committee sat towards the close of last year. From that report it appears that a plan precisely similar to my own, namely, of raising £200,000 on the security of waste lands, to be expended on emigration, has been sub- mitted to the Legislative Council ; and that a letter had been addressed to the Council, giving the sanction and approbation of numerous persons of property and intelligence to the pro- posal in question. I understand the committee referred this proposal to eighty-four of the most intelligent and extensive proprietors in the colony; that fifty-eight expressed themselves in terms of the highest approbation of the measure ; eight only declined to give an opinion : and eighteen objected to it, chiefly from the fear of its becoming a job, and that there was no security that the whole money would be applied to immigra- tion, as the colonial government had already applied a consi- derable portion of the proceeds of the land sales to other pur- poses than those of immigration. If the motion of my Hpnour- able Friend were carried, the only objection to this plan would therefore be removed, and I am assured that the colony would be unanimous in its support. To conclude, I entreat the earnest consideration of the House and of the government to this subject, as the only means of abolishing transportation without endangering the prosperity of the penal colonies; as the only means of continuing that prosperity, and improving the moral state of these communi- ties. It is a means, likewise, of affording, without any expense 55 to this country, the most extensive fields for the employment of our surplus population. It would create a commerce 20 vast that the imagination could hardly form a conception of what, in a brief period, it might not become. I am profoundly con- vinced that the southern regions of the globe, Australia, New Zealand, and the myriads of islands of the Polynesian sea, might ere long form the most important markets for the pro- ductions of the industry of Great Britain, and amply compen- sate for those markets, which we are on the eve of losing in the old world ; provided those fair and fertile portions of the earth's surface were peopled with men of the British race, with wants, feelings, and desires similar to our own ; and this I firmly believe might be accomplished by that plan of systematic emi- gration, which was proposed by my Honourable Friend, and to which I give my most cordial support. Mb. LABOUCHERE said, that whatever difference of opinion might be entertained on this subject, or on the general principle involved in the resolutions proposed by his Honourable Friend the Member for Sheffield, or in any of those various details by which his Honourable Friend proposed to carry those resolutions into effect, he was quite suvo that it was the unanimous opinion of the House, that no ^m ater or more important subject, no question more truly deserving the serious attention of the Parliament, could possibly be brouglii under their consideration ; he agreed with his Honourable Friend> that as it was the duty at all times of the Government of this country, and of the colonies, to encourage emigration, by every fair and legitimate means, it was a dut^ still more incum- bent upon them on many accounts at the present time. During the short period of time which he had had the honour to be con- nected with the Colonial Office, it was impossible for him not to have been forcibly struck with the circumstances that had been adverted to, that not only on the part of the labouring classes of this country, but also on the part of a class of persons who had hitherto shown a reluctance to leave their native country, many 1*1 ,:. persons in luC higher conditions of life, and possessed of small capital, had shown a most remarkable desire at the present mo- ment to seek in other colonies, and in the distant possessions of the British empire, the means of acquiring an honest indepen- dence, which was not so readily afforded in the mother country. He agreed in the sentiment of his Honourable Friend, and so far from this being a matter of reproach to those persons, and so far from those persons being discouraged, it reflected the highest honour upon them, and he rejoiced in thinking that in leaving this country they did not estrange themselves from its real and permanent interests, but on the contrary, they proved their at- tachment to those interests by trusting themselves to those dis- tant possessions to which they were proceeding. He would say, therefore, that assuredly he had any thing rather than a preju- dice against emigration ; on the contrary, it always appeared to him among the many glories and blessings permitted to this coun- try, as a means by which Providence had allowed the English race and language to spread over so vast a surface, the manner, laws, liberties, and institutions of this country ; there could be no more solemn duty imposed upon them than that they should avail themselves to the utmost of the vast means which Providence had been pleased to put into their hands, in order that they might effect the greatest blessing given to the human race, namely, wherever there were unoccupied lands, affordliig the means of extending the influence of the British nation, that they should avail themselves of such opportunities. He must fairly confess to the House that he could have wished, consistently with his duty, not to have been called upon to deal with this question so soon after his connection with the Colonial Office, or to have addressed the House upon a subject of so much com- plication and difficulty, to which many gentlemen present had had an opportunity of paying much more attention than he had been able to afford to give it. At the same time he felt bound , to make some statement in reply to the motion of his Honoura- ble Friend. His Honourable Friend began his speech by at- tacking the system of disposing of the waste landa of the Crown, 67 which before the last ten years had prevailed. He could assure Lis Hoi?ourable Friend and the House that of this system they should hear no defence or apology from him. System he could hardly call that which would be more accurately described as a total want of all system. It was really quite melancholy to see the mischief that had been done by that pestilent system of jobbing that existed. It was impossible to read the Earl of Durham's account of the North American colonies, and to re- flect upon what had been done there under the old system, and what they might have been under another system, and what they were now, without the strongest feelings of indignation and regret. He could, therefore, assure his Honourable Friend that he would be disappointed if he expected that he (Mr. Labouchere) "'iould in any degree defend that former system. But, like many other things, it was difHcult to retrace their steps. " Revocare gradum superasque evadere ad auras Hie labor, hoc opus est." Immediately to return to sounder principles might be at- tended with very considerable difficulties, and a just and rea- sonable Government must proceed with caution in a question surrounded by so many difficulties, and in which the rights and feelings of the people of the colonies and the legislatures were 80 much involved. He could only assure the Rouse, on the part of the Government, that he should extremely rejoice if he found a disposition, as he had reason to believe existed, among the local legislatures of the North American provinces to take the most effectual means of getting rid of the existing abuses, pnd so far from throwing any impediment in their way, the Govern- ment would be glad to assist them in getting rid of them. As to the resolutions of his Honourable Friend, in the first place he was not prepared to deny what the Honourable Member called the fundan.ental principle of the disposition of colonial lands. He quit*^ agreed with his Honourable Friend that free grants were altogether an abuse ; and he altogether agreed with him that the only just means for the disposition of the lands of 68 i the Crown in the colonies was by impartial sale at a just and sufficient price. But while he entirely assented to that prin- ciple, he found several details in his Hone arable Friend's speech from which he would not say that he entirely dissented, but upo'ii which he confessed he had not sufficient means to give any decided opiuicn ; bui; he did say this, that there was enough of difference of opinion among persons whose authority was great in that House — persons of official station and personal ex- perience in the colonies — persons who had the best means of understanding the subject, and who had considered it impar- tially and closely — to induce him to think that it would be ex- tremely unadvisable that that House should pledge itself not only to the general principles of these resolutions, but to the details by which he sought to carry them into execution. The first important principle in these resolutions was that contained in the second res lution, in which it was stated "that amidst the great variety of methods of disposing of waste lands which have been pursued by the British Parliament, the most effec- tual beyond all comparison is the plan of sale at a fixed, uniform, and sufficient price." This plan obtained at the present moment in the colonies, where the mode of sale was by auction to the highest bidder, with a minimum price. He found many of the , most intelligent persons with whom he had had communication — some of them governors of colonies, who had the amplest means of forming an opinion — who all believed that it would be unwise to act on the principle recommended by his Honour- able Friend, namely, that all lands, however different in situa- tion and soil, however circumstanced as to the convenience of rivers and towns, should be sold precisely at the same price. He found a different scheme more generally recommended, namely, setting on a sufficient minimum price, and then throwing the land into the market, leaving it to competition to determine by auction whether a greater price ought not to be given. His own impression was certainly in favour of selling by auction, which was the system which had been adopted in the United States of America. He thought that under the new system 69 proposed, there would be extreme difficulty in guarding against jobbing and unfair preferences where there happened to be valuable land. He would on this subject refer the House to the opinion of an intelligent and distinguished public officer. Sir G. Gipps, Goyernor of New South Wales, who said, in one of his despatches, that nothing, in his opinion, was so essential to the prosperity of a colony as to maintain inviolate the prin- ciple of selling all lands by public auction to the highest bidder. He warned the House against committing themselves to a prin- ciple like that proposed, until they had had further time for in- vestigation. He would come to the next part of the resolution, which went on to recommend ** the employment of the whole or a large fixed portion of the purchase money in affording a passage to the colony, cost free, to young persons of the labour- ing classes, in an equal proportion of the sexes." He agreed, as a general principle, that it was most desirable that a large proportion of the money received from the sale of land, should be devoted to the purpose of promoting emigration ; but he ob- jected to the House pledging itself to any strict and definite pro- posal on this subject. The colony of South Australia was held out as a model for all future colonies, and in the fourth resolu- tion it was stated that " this method of colonising had been applied to the new colony of South Australia with very remark- able and gratifying results." Now he begged to call the attention of the House to what had actually taken place in that colony. The fundamental principle on which that colony was founded was that the net proceeds of the land should be devoted to the purposes of emigration. It was quite true that in their first bill this prin- ciple was strictly and rigidly laid down. The commissioners- were forbidden from devoting a shilling to any other purpose whatever, and he was quite sure what he was going to say would be a warning to the House against precipitately laying down abstract rules. For what was the fact Not « year pas- sed over when the promoters of the first bill came and asked for an important qualification. They had been borrowing 60 'I ' h, 'f .■: i money at £10 per cent, to carry on the general government of the colony, and finding this a very extravagant mode of pro- ceeding, whilst they were getting money through the sale of their land, they brought in a bill to enable the land fund to be loaned to the fund for the general government ; or, in other words, to apply the proceeds of the land fund to the general government. Was he not, thei. , justified in calling upon the House to pause before they committed themselves to any plan of a similar description ? But there was a claim of a more sacred and important nature to be provided for than even emigration, most important as that was — he meant the pro- tection of the interests of the aboriginal inhabitants. One of their first objects should be to see that those persons were duly protected and taken care of out of the proceeds of the land funds. There were also other expenses, such as road-making and surveying, which might very properly be charged upon the land funds. These were grounds against laying down a strict and unvariable rule, which, however well they looked on paper, would, he was sure, fail in practice. The next point adverted to in the resolutions to which he would call the atten- tion of the House, was the recommendation "that in order to derive the greatest possible advantage from this method of colonising, it is essential that the permanence of the system should be secured by the legislature, and that its administration should be entrusted to a distinct subordinate branch of the colonial department, authorised to sell colonial lands in this country, to anticipate the sales of land by raising loans for emigration on the security of future land sales." He was very far from saying that it might not be right and proper, under circumstances, to anticipate the land revenues of a country for purposes of this kind ; but he felt that this was a principle which ought not to be brought into action without the greatest caution, and under very strict limitations, and he for one would object to Parliament holding out vague promises which it might not be expedient to act up to afterwards. He had already ventured to read a passage from a dispatch of Sir. G. at Gipps, on one part of this subject, and he would beg leave to read another, as he was sure it would have much more weight than any thing he could say. Sir G. Gipps said, that with re- gard to the project of pledging the land revenue to purposes of emigration, it should be recollected that this was the only fund which the executive government had to defray any charges which the Legislative Council might be disposed to reject ; that it was impossible to maintain in a distant colony a suffi- cient check over imprudent expenditure. He begged pardon, he was reading a wrong extract. He was not by any means sorry that he had read it, but the passage he had meant to read was, that the carrying on of emigration on a large scale by means of a loan, would be to create a perpetual debt against the colony, which experience had taught them would not easily be got rid of, and moreover, it would be extremely difficult to administer the government of the colony with a proper economy in the midst of the factitious wealth produced by the loan. His Hon. Friend the member for Sheffield had only done justice to his Noble Friend near him (Lord Howick), when he stated that he had been instrumental in placing the system with regard to the disposal of the land revenues on a much better footing than it was previous to the year 1831. At this period the regulations of Lord Goderich were adopted and the effect produced by them on the land revenues of Aus- tralia, and the emigration to that country was very remarkable. In 1830, the land revenue of New South Wales amounted to £1,896. This was under the old system. In 1831 they amounted to £3,018; in 1832, to £13,683; in 1833, to £26,272 ; in 1834, to £43,489 ; in 1836, to £89,875 ; in 1836 to £108,568 ; and in 1837, to £127,866. This afforded a most encouraging proof of the extent to which these resources had been called into operaiion under a fair and proper system. He would state how the money had been applied to emigration during that time. In the year 1832, £5,177 had been devoted to emigration, in 1833, £9,026; in 1834, £7,979; in 1835, £10,764; in 1836, £11,794; and in 1837, £44,729. The 02 ■\>i i i I i House would observe that the year 1837 was the first year in which the government system of emigration had been really carried into operation. In 1838, when the system came fully into operation, no less a sum than .£110,000 was devoted to the purposes of emigration to New South Wales alone. No less than 24 emigrant ships went out, containing 6,500 persons ; and during that year the total number of emigrants to New South Wales amounted to 10,000. He thought that this state- ment would satisfy the House, that there was every disposition on the part of the Government to give encouragement to well regulated emigrations, but he must warn the House against supposing that it was impossible to send emigrants to a colony in too great numbers, in the absence of previous enquiry and regulations. Great temporary evil might occur from taking to a particular colony at a certain time a very large number of emigrants ; and at that moment, by the last account from Sir G. Gipps, it appeared that even in New South Wales, owing to the accidental circumstance of a long drought, there was no demand for labour, and persons might be seen with their hands crossed, unable to find employment. If they took from the colonies all control, and gave it to an office in London, he did feel that the results might be very disastrous and unfortunate. He did not wish to trouble the House with any further obser- vations. He was truly sensible of the deep importance of this subject, and he might say for the Noble Marquess who held the seals of the Colonial Office, that there was no subject on which he was more anxious. He could assure his Honourable Friend and the House that his Noble Friend approached this subject with a mind wholly unprejudiced, and that he was most anx- ious at the first season of leisure to examine the question in all its details, with a sincere anxiety to do what was best for the interest of the colonies and of the mother country. He hoped that his Honourable Friend would resi satisfied with this assu- rance, and that he would be of opinion that this was a question which might more properly be left to the executive. He did not say this with any wish to evade the question, as he was aa animated solely by a desire cautiously and carefully to come to a conclusion that would most conduce to the interest and the welfare of the colonies and of the mother country. Mr. WARBURTON said he hoped his Honourable Friend, the Member for Sheffield, would not rest satisfied with the mere assurance of the Government that this matter would re- ceive from them due consideration. The question stood ripe for the decision of the Government upon it. What was asked for by the present motion was this : that certain fixed principles should be laid down, on which the Government, in all future sales of colonial land, and in the application of the produce of those sales, should be bound to act: that the Colonial Office should be deprived of that discretion which it now did, or might in future, exercise according to its will and pleasure, of acting or declining to act upon those principles. The Govern- ment understood those principles ; for they had already acted upon them, to a limited extent, in New South Wales and in the new colony"of South Australia ; and by these two experiments which had been eminently successful, the practical importance to this country of an adherence to these principles had been fully ascertained. Why then delay passing an Act which should be a rule for the guidance in time to come of the Colo- nial Office. In the place of such a rule what had they now to depend upon but the capricious exercise of the Prerogative ; and with what utter disregard to the interests of the colonies that Prerogative was exercised, an example was afforded in the case of Nova Scotia. What could be thought of the attention paid by the mother country to the interests of that colony, when, in order to pay a gambling debt of the Duke of York, all the mines and minerals of Nova Scotia were at one fell swoop granted away to that Royal Duke? The grant was sold to a London silversmith, to whom these important rights were thus transferred in perpetuity. The important coal-mines of that colony, situated like those of our own country, near the sea 64 ii Hi: . -■■■(■■ coast, on the proper working of which in future time might depend the navigation by steam of those seas, and the main- tenance in that quarter of our naval superiority, the Crown by one lavish grant, had assigned away. If a man wished for a libel upon our system of Colonial Government, where could he find a stronger one than in the fact he had adduced ? Acts, pregnant with mischief, such as these, done in utter dis- regard to the interests of the colony, would almost justify rebellion. The Under Secretary for the Colonies had stated that other demands than demands for emigration, might be made upon the land revenues ; demands which ought to be defrayed from that source : for the sake of argument, grant that to be the case. He would then say let one-fourth or one-fifth be applied for those demands, and let three-fourths or four-fifths be applied for the purposes of emigration. Let them only lay down a fixed principle, not to be set aside or over-ruled by the mere dictum of a Colonial Secretary, but a permanent basis to which the country could look with certainty. After the luminous ex- position of that principle given by the Honourable Member for Sheflield and the Honourable Baronet the Member for Leeds, he did not consider he need expatiate on that part of the sub- ject. He only wished to express his conviction that the present and future prosperity of our colonies mainly depended on the car^^ing into complete effect these principles, first expounded by the clear intelligence of Mr. Wakefield. He sincerely trusted that some distinct statement would go forth from the Government that they intended steadily to apply the proceeds of the colonial land revenues in aid of emigration. There was one part of the plan of his Honourable Friend, the Member for Shefiield, from which he dissented, and that was the reservation to the Commissioners of power to raise loans by way of mortgage, in anticipation of the annual re- venue, to accrue frem the sale of lands. This would occasion an unsteady and fluctuating demand for emigrant labour in the mother country, a great demand in those years when the 66 capital thus received by loan was to be expended,, a slack demand in those years when they liad only the surplus annual revenue to apply. Now it was of importance to the Mother country, that the yearly demand for the labourers who were to emigrate, and for the shipping to be employed in conveying the labourers, should be, as nearly as might be, constant, or steadily p'-ogressive. Desirous as he was of promoting this plan of emigration, as a means of relieving the pressure of our population on the means of subsistence, he begged to guard himself against his being supposed to maintain the doctrine, that the Legislature, by affording this manner of relief, was in any degree exempted from the obligation of taking those other measures which would give life to industry at home, and advance the prosperity of the operatives; from the obligation of allowing our artisans freely to exchange the work of their hands with the produce of other countries of whatever description. Free trade in articles of biibsistence, and a well devised system of emigration, were ihe means best calculated to promote the permanent prosperity of the working classes in this country. LORD HOWICK. I HAVE observed with very great satisfaction the apparently general concurrence of the House in the important principle, with respect to the disposal and occupation of land in the British Colonies, which has been so well stated la his speech by the Honourable Member tor Sheffield. Nothing certainly can be farther from my intention than to express any difference of opinion from the Honourable Member respecting this prin- ciple ; on the contrary^ I entirely agree with him as to its soundness and extreme importance, and I think also with him, that its discovery reflects great honour upon the jientleman by whom it was brought to light, and who first pointed out its influence upon the success of all schemes of colonization. As far as I am aware, the benefits to be derived from the prevention of an undue dispersion of settlers in a new territory, with the F 6G •1 .'; .Ill S '3 m means by which this ubject can best be accomplished, and the necessity of combined labr ir, which, in a new country, can o:Jy be secured by artificially maintaining a proper proportion between the numbers of the population and the extent of land which they occupy, had entirely escaped the notice of all writers upon political economy, until they we.t stated in those works of Mr. Wakefield to which the Honourable Member for Shef- field has referred in terms of well-deserved commendation. I consider these principles to be not less important than they were novel at the time they were brought into notice by Mr. Wakefield, and they will also, I am convinced, be found to be of very general application. They apply not only to the Australian and North American colonies, but, as the Honour- able Member has justly observed, it is in them that we must seek for the real cause of the introduction of slavery into our West Indian colonics, ai?d it is only therefore, I believe, by measures founded upon them that the difiiculties which have followed its abolition can be effectually removed, nor will the great measure of emancipation be rendered productive of all thj good v.'hich ought to flow from it, unless the legislatures of these colonies, by a wise application of the principles I have now referred to, endeavour to procure a regular supply of free labour. But however fully I agree with the Honourable Member for Sheffield as to the importance of the leading principle of the resolutions he has moved ^ I must at the same time express my strong doubts whether it would be expedient that they should be adopted by the House. The first resolution states only an abstract truth, which it is I believe, impossible to deny; I have therefore no other objection to otFer to it, except that it is unnecessary, and that taken by itself, and if not followed up by others tending to practical measures, it could lead to no useful result. But the second and third resolutions, which do point to practical measures, are expressed in terms much too absolute and too general to be safely adopted by the House, at least in their present fowii. These resolutions would imply that the 67 adoption of that policy with respect to the occupation of land for which the Honourable Member contends, should at once be enforced in all the British colonies by the authority of Parlia- ment. Now, at least so far as regards the North American colonics, which have attained considerable wealth, civilization, and importance, and which have legislatures of their own, this would, in my opinion, be a most inexpedient course ; it would be an interference with the local legislatures, which would be in the highest degree impolitic and improper. It is perfectly true, as the Honourable Member has stated, that there have been in these colonies very great abuses and much mismanage- ment in the way in which land has been granted ; but I cannot concur with him in attributing this mismanagement entirely, or even principally, to any thing like corruption, or a desire to promote improperly their own individual interests on the part either of the Government or oi the Colonial authorities. I had no connexion with the Government in the days in which these things took place, and I have therefore no interest in under- taking its defence; but, in justice to it, I must say, that although I am not prepared to deny the existence of jobbing in some cases, *\e mismanagement in respect to grants of lands was mainly i ,tributable to the ignorance which then generally prevailed of the principles upon which this most important part of the administration of a colony should be conducted ; the evil arose principally from mistakes honestly committed, and mis- takes, I must add, for which the Colonial legislatures were certainly not less to blame than the Government. The popular feeling in these colonies was altogether in favour of facilitating the acquisition of land by the bona fide settler, and this was the object which the Government had in view; but neither the Government nor the Colonial legislatures perceived that it was one which could not practically be accomplished in the manner it was attempted. It was in vain to declare that no individual should obtain a grant of more than a certain size. Large tracts of land, wMch they could not improve, were still monopolised by individuals, who evaded the regulation by purchasing, at a f: I i I 1 I If' , n '\« i| (I G8 nominal price, the grant? which poor settlers liad a right to claim, and this evasion could not be prevented by forbidding for a certain time, the alienation of land which had been granted, without greatly impeding the application of capital and the improvement of the land. In the same manner, the most stringent regulations which could be devised to enforce the settlement and improvement of the land which was granted have always failed, from the impossibility which has been experienced of enforcing the rules which have been laid down, and compelling parties to perform fhe conditions attached to their grants. The whole system upon which these measures were adopted was, in my opinion, unsound ; and it was the far wiser and better principle, which Mr. Wakefield was the first to recommend, that every man should be allowed to obtain, not by grant but by purchase, as much land as he chose, free from all conditions and all restrictions as to the use he might make of it, trusting that by requiring a sufficient price to be paid, a regard for their own interest would prevent individuals from seeking to obtain more land than they could occupy with advantage to themselves and to the community. In answer to a complaint of the Assembly of Lower Canada upon this sub- ject, the reasons for the adoption of this principle in the disposal of the Crown lands were stated by Lord Ripon, in a despatch with which I am sure the Honourable Member for Sheffield is acquainted, and of which I am equally sure that he must entirely approve. But, Sir, the Honourable Member must be aware that the views stated in this despatch, however consistent with his opinion and with sound policy, failed to command the assent of the Colonial Legislature. The Assembly, and I be- lieve I may add the colonists generally, still continued to prefer the policy of granting land, and of endeavouring to facilitate as much as possible its occupation by the poor settler. Nor is this the popular opinion only in our own colonies; it extends equally to the United States, and the Honourable Member, when he so highly commends the system which has there been adopted, cannot be ignorant that there is, at this moment, a 69 strong and general feeling amongst a large part of the popu- lation in favour of what is termed the ** easy occupation of land," aird that a proposition has been made (nor am I sure that it has not been adopted), for a reduction of the price of land, already far too low according to the principle for which the Honourable Member contends. Indeed, I so far differ from the praise which the Honourable Member for Sheffield has bestowed upon the management of their public lands, by the'tJnited States, that I think these States at this moment afford a* very striking proof of the bad effects which result from neglecting that most important prin- ciple of restraining the natural tendency to disperse in the settlers of a new country, which it was the main object of Mr. Wakefield's writings to enforce. Formerly, from being sur- rounded by hostile tribes of warlike savages, the settlers in what are now the United States were compelled to keep closely together, for the purposes of mutual succour and defence, but now that they are no longer under the influence of the same motives, they have scattered themselves to immense distances over extensive tracts of land, and it is this dispersion of the population which has not been checked by the too low price demanded for land, which has in my opinion been the principal cause of that almost barbarous state of some of the Western States, in which we hear of Lynch law, and of so many other moral and social evils. I have mentioned these things, in order to show how exceedingly strong ii prejudice pervades the whole North American continent, in favour of giving every facility to the settlement and occupation of land ; if therefore, by Act of Parliament we were to attempt to run counter to this strong popular feeling, and to enforce the adoption of a wiser policy, I fear it would be at the risk of entirely failing in the measures we might adopt. By persuasion and influence we may do much towards introducing that system, which I agree with the Honourable Member for Sheffield, in approving ; but if we carry our interference too far, and endeavour to act with au- thority, we may produce an effect the very opposite of that 70 1 1 jj hi } ' which we desire, and at the same time the most disastrous po- litical consequences. It must not be forgotten, that since the Crown revenues in the North American colonies have been given up to the Assemblies, the Imperial Government has no power to act in these matters, except with their concurrence. With their concurrence much no doubt may be done, and I trust that all proper means will be adopted to obtain it, but I must most seriously caution the House against encouraging any attempt to proceed by coercive measures. For these reasons, I think the resolutions which have been proposed are inapplicable to our North American colonies, nor are they less so to those in the West Indies; the Honourable Member said, that the principle which should be followed in the disposal of land had been very recently stated in a despatch, addressed to the governors of the West Indian colonies by Lord Glenelg, but he complained that this despatch had been al- lowed to become a dead letter. I admit that this despatch has not led to any important results, but the Honourable Member has not adverted to the fact, that the reason of its having been so nearly inoperative is, that most of the land in these colonies had already previously been granted to individuals. Even in the large island of Jamaica, of which so small a portion is yet occupied, I am informed that the right of property in only about 5000 acres remains to the Crown ; it is not, therefore, by merely restricting the grant of land that the principle of the Honourable Member can ba practically carried into effect ; it is in vain for the Crown to put a high price on the land of which it still retains possession, while so much belonging to indivi- duals can be brought into the market, and by competition will necessarily keep down its value. Under these circumstances the only manner in which the principle of restricting the occu- pation of land can be carried into effect, is by the measure to which the Honourable Member himself adverted, namely, the imposition of a tax upon land. Undoubtedly this would in my opinion be a most advisable measure, nor do I believe that in a majority of the West Indian colonies, a regular supply of 71 labour will ever bo obtained, until the greater part of the re- venue necessary for carrying on the public service shall be raised by a direct impost upon the land, instead of by indirect taxa- tion ; but here again it is only by the intervention of the colonial legislatures that this policy can be adopted ; the resolutions, therefore, which the Honourable Member has proposed in terms 80 general and extensive, are as inapplicable to the West Indian, as to the North American colonies. There remain then, only the Australian colonies, as to which the resolutions of the Honourable Member can with propriety be applied, and I would ask him, what are the grounds upon which, even as regards them, he conceives it to be necessary for the House to adopt such a step ? The intervention of Par- liament is surely not required fov the purpose of inducing the executive government to adopt that policy, in the disposal of land in Australia, which he has advocated, since he has himself stated, that this policy was first suggested in some writings of Mr. Wakefield, about ten years ago, and in the beginning of 1831, that is, within two years or little more, of the time when the suggestion was made, it was adopted by Lord Ripon, so far as regards the Australian colonies. But then, the Honourable Member said, it is not sufficient that the system should be adopted by the Government, what one Secretary of State has done, another may undo, and with the rapid succession of different persons at the head of the Colo- nial office, there can be no security for that permanence in one line of policy upon this subject, which is so essential for its success. No doubt this is a plausible objection, but have we practically experienced those constant changes in the sys- tem of disposing of land in Australia, which the Honourable Member apprehends must be the consequence of frequent changes in the Colonial office ? On the contrary, though Lord Normanbf is the fifth Secretary of State, who has held that office since Lord Ripon's resignation, the rule which was laid down in 1831, that Crown land should be alienated by public sale, has ever since been strictly adhered to. It is true, some 72 grants have been made, but tbese have only been grants to which parties were entitled under engagements entered into by the Government, previously to 1831, and I am sure, the Honourable Member is the last man who would contend that the change of system then adopted, would have justified a breach of engagements with private individuals, which had already been contracted. For the purpose, then, of ensuring a permanent adherence to the system adopted by Lord Ripon, so far as regards the alienation of the Crown lands in Austra- lia, exclusively by public sale, I think the Honourable Member cannot possibly contend, that it is necessary for the House to come to the resolution he has proposed, or to legislate upon this subject. But, I think I hear the Honourable Member say, that there has not- been equal steadiness in adhering to the policy adopted by Lord Ripon, with regard to the appro- priation of the revenue derived from the sale of land, that the money so produced, ought to be exclusively devoted to the promotion of emigration, and that in 1834, a large proportion of it was improperly diverted to other objects. 1 agree with the Honourable Member in thinking, not only that land ought to be alienated exclusively by sale, but also, that in the present condition of the Australian colonies, the encouragement of emigration is the most useful object to which the proceeds of the land sales can be applied. But though I concur so far in the opinion -of the Honourable Gentleman, 1 cannot admit that it is proper to lay down any strict and inflexible rule, that the whole, or even any given and large proportion of the revenue derived from the sale of land, shall be laid out in carrying on a system of emigration. It must in the first place, be admitted by all, that the expense of col- lecting the revenue, must at all events, be defrayed out of it, and in this, must be reckoned not only the expense of survey, but other very large items of expense, in the formation of roads, and the building of bridges, schools, and churches, which are necessary for the advantageous settlement of the cou itry, The sums so laid out, may justly be regarded as employed in 73 5 preparing more land for sale, and increasing its value, and augmenting the future revenue ; and as such means of com- munication and public buildings, are absolutely essential for. the existence of civilized society, if the funds necessary for effecting these improvements, are not provided from the pro- ceeds of the sales of land, they must, in the settlement of a colony, be defrayed by taxes, which every Government, includ- ing that of the United States, has found it very difficult and very disadvantageous to impose upon such infant com- munities. I perceive that my Honourable Friend the Member for Lis- keard, cheers in a manner which implies a contradiction of what I have now asserted. I understand what he means, I know that he would imply, that the great superiority of the system of settlement adopted by the United States, over that pursued in the adjoining British Colonies, is, that in the former there exist municipal institutions, which by the power they possess of imposing rates, provide for those important local objects to which I have just adverted. I do not deny this ad- vantage on the part of the United States, I am aware that the improvements of civilized life, make their appearance in an early stage of their settlements, as compared with those of Canada, I am far from undervaluing the achievements of their extraordinary energy and enterprise ; but still, unless we are to disbelieve the accounts of every traveller who has described the condition of the Western States, it is impossible to doubt that the manner in which the wilderness is first occupied by the backwoodsmen, who have been termed the pioneers of civilization, is rude and barbarous in the extreme ; each family settles upon the land cleared by its own labour, separated often from its nearest neighbours by impenetrable forests, without roads, without schools, without churches, without all those advantages which constitute the whole difference between civi- lization and barbarism. The Honourable Member says, that the only revenue which by lavv they can raise for such objects as these, is that derived from local sales ; but, Sir, it is because 74 ■Ml m ';?# ■>: ■ r 'ill such is the case, it is because a higher price is not put upon land, and the purchase money applied to these most necessary purposes, that they are altogether neglected in the early stages of settlement, when the population is thinly scattered, and money cannot be raised by local contributions^. My Honour- able Friend may have a different account to give of all these things, he may tell us, that even in the back settlements of the United States, good roads, public buildings, and all the evidences of a highly civilized society are to be found, but he must excuse me for saying, that the three or four months which he has had the advantage of passing on the other side of the Atlantic, do not quite entitle him to knock down at once, with his authority, what those, who have not tra- velled like himself may advance, on what they consider sufficient evidence. Travellers' tales should proverbially be received with caution, and though I am well aware that nothing can be farther from my Honourable Friend's inten- tion than to mislead us by erroneous information, I cannot help thinking that he saw so much, and heard so much, during his short visit to America, that his recollection is not upon all points quite so clear as might be wished ; nor can I help reminding him, that this is not the first time that he has used his authority as a traveller, to give me a point blank contradiction upon a matter on which he has since turned out to be completely in the wrong. I am aware that I am going a little out of the subject immediately under discussion, but I trust I may be excused for mentioning to the House one circumstance, as a proof of the necessity of our placing some limit to that credence, which we are always disposed to yield to the bold and positive statements of these travelled gentlemen. The House may perhaps remember that some time ago, during a discussion upon the alleged insufficiency of the force in New Brunswick when threat- ened with hostilities from the State of Maine, the Honourable Gentleman made himself very merry at my expense, for having asserted that Sir John Harvey might, in case of neces- I 76 uty receive agsistance from the Governor of Lower Canada ; he treated with supreme contempt the ignorance which such a supposition implied, and told me that the succour upon which I calculated, could not possibly, at such a time, reach New Brunswick from Lower Canada, unless indeed, the troops who were to afford it, could be carried in a balloon. Now, it so happens, that at the very time it was said to be so entirely impossible, a regiment was marched without the slightest difficulty from Lower Canada to New Brunswick, that it arrived there in ample time to have afforded the aid, which it was apprehended that Sir John Harvey might have required, and when this was found not to be the case, it marched back with the same ease that it had come. I have mentioned this fact only to show to the House the pro- priety of receiving with a little caution the somewhat hasty state- ments of the Honourable Gentleman ; — to return to the ar- gument I was pursuing, I must repeat, upon the concurrent testimony of every traveller, except -my Honourable Friend, that in their infancy, the new settlements of the Western States of America do not enjoy the advantage of tolerable roads, of schools, and of similar marks of civilization. I contend that if in the colonization of Australia we would realize the views of Mr. Wakefield, and occupy the country notwith a population falling back into a rude and semi-barbarous condition, but with one enjoying all the advantages of civilization and of a regularly organized society, we must not only take care to prevent tiie undue dispersion of the inhabitants by requiring a sufficient price for the land, but we must also apply a part of the revenue thus obtained in effecting those necessary local improvements which cannot by any other means be so well provided for. I have always thought that the money derived from the sale of land in the colonies should be regarded as a part of their ca- pital, which as such should be invested in their permanent im- provement, not applied in common with the rest of the oi-dinary revenue to the purpose of current expenditure. Upon this prin- ciple it seems to me that in the present condition of the Aus- 76 I I tralian colonies, there is no permanent object to which these sums can be devoted of equal importance with the encourage- ment of emigration, and I therefore entirely concur with the Honourable Member lor Sheffield in thinking that the largest part of these funds ought to be so applied for the present ; but when the Honourable Member i'f^v Bridport hence argues, that we ought to fix by positive law the proportion of tlie land revenue which shall be strictly reserved for this exclusive purpose, I would point out to him the objection to this course which arises from the fact that the proportion which he would invariably fix, is lisible to constant alteration. It is obvious that al- though at the present moment it may be expedient to apply much the larger proportion of the funds in question to emigra- tion, and reserve only a smaller sum for those local objects which I have mentioned, as the colony increases in population and in extent, this will cease to be the case, as the necessity of emi"^ i- tion will diminish, and the amount of expenditure required in preparing new tracts of land for the occupation of the native in- habitants will increase. But the Honourable Member no doubt will say that even the principle I have now endeavoured to lay down was widely departed from by the diversion, in 1834, of a large part of the revenue derived from the sale of land in New South Wales to the maintenance of th'^ police. I admit this to have been the case, and I regret with the Honourable Member the necessity which existed of so applying this money ; but at the same time I must observe that this necessity arose from the reluctance of the colonists to provide by other taxes for an expense which, in justice, they were bound to defray. The expense of the police in New South Wales is a charge which upon no principles of fairness can be imposed upon the people of this country ; for though it may be true that the necessity for keeping up so large and expensive a police force in that colony may arise from the character of the convicts sent from hence, it is no less true, as was well observed by the Honourable Baronet the Member for Leeds, that the astonishing wealth of our penal n colonies is almost entirely derived from the labour of these same convicts. Surely, then, the colonists cannot expect at once to enjoy this advantage, and to be relieved from the burthen by which it is accompanied? I conceive, therefore, that the charge for the police was properly thrown upon the colony, and that as its inhabitants were unwilling; to provide for the charge by other taxes, it was only just that it should be met by a diver- sion of the land revenue from an object in which they are chiefly interested, instead of throwing the burthen upon the people of this country. These considerations justify the conduct in this particular, of the Government in 1834, which was objected to by the Honourable Member for Sheffield, and I can conceive many cases in which it would be better to divert a portion of the revenue arising from the sale of land to meet the necessary expenses of the colony, than to press too severely upon the revenue of a young and growing society by premature taxation ; nor is it a little remarkable that this is the course which has been actually followed both in the United States and in South Australia — the examples which the Honourable Member for Sheffield particularly pointed out to us for imitation. As to the United States, indeed, I think that when the Honourable Member for Sheffield said that we ought to follow their foot- steps, and that if we meant to pursue the same wise policy as to the disposal of land, we must take the system as a whole, and not attempt to adopt it only in part, he must surely have forgotten that although the sale of land may be conducted in that republic in a manner conformable to his views, this cer- tainly is not the case with respect to the application of the revenue thus obtained ; on the contrary, not one shilling of the money so obtained is applied in assisting emigration from the eastern States ; it is not even applied to those purposes of local improvement, which I regard as one of the most legitimate modes of employing it, but it is, on the contrary, almost entirely expended as a part of the ordinary revenue in carrying on the public service. This is the mode of appropriating the sums T» li ^'\:h ,i :lf| M''i:^ '■■f & mi'- P i received from the sale of land which appears even to me an unwise one, though I am not prepared to push to the same extent with him the principle for which the Honourable Member contends. * But the example of South Australia is still more remarkable. T .'.s colony was founded for the very purpose of practically trying that system of colonization which it is the object of the Honourable Member to recommend to us. Its admmistration is principally entrusted to Commissioners, who are almost all gentlemen particularly distinguished for their advocacy of this system. The Secretary of State has left them to pursue their own course, almost free from any interference on his part ; and yet even in this colony, so founded and so governed, it has not been found practically possible to adhere rigidly to that mode of appropriating the funds derived from this sale of land, which the Honourable Member now calls upon the House to declare by his proposed resolution that the Legislature ought to enforce generally in all our colonies by a strict enactment. I confess I was greatly surprised that ths Honourable Member in his speech totally omitted all reference to that very remarkable circumstance to which I now allude, and which was stated by my Right Honourable Friend the Under Secretary of State, namely, that the Commissioners of South Australia had been compelled to obtain the authority of Parliament for diverting to other objects a part of those funds arising from the sale of land, which by the original act were made exclusively appli- cable to emigration. It is true some explanation of this has been attempted, but to what does it amount ? Why simply to this, that to meet the necessary expenses of the first settlement of the colony it was better to take a part of the funds derived from the sale of land, than to borrow money at so high an interest as ten per cent, on the credit of its future revenue. No doubt it is so, and it is on that account I say Parliament ought not to lay down a strict and unvarying rule which experience has shewn that it is impossible in all cases to adhere to without great inconvenience, since even in South Australia it has been 79 found that an application of a part of the funds derived from the sale of land, which the resolutions of the Honourable Member would, under no circumstances, permit, afforded the only method of avoiding the necessity of saddling the colony with the burden of a loan on very high interest. I perceive the Honourable Member for Hull is listenins to what I have now stated ; if I am wrong, I shall be glad to hear from him an account of the revenue hitherto raised in the colony from any source but the sale of land, and therefore applicable, ac- cording to the original scheme, to its ordinary expenses. Some- thing, no doubt, may have been raised by duties on importa- tion, but I am much mistaken if as yet funds have been levied by these or any other taxes nearly sufficient to meet the neces- sary expenses of the government, leaving these, therefore, necessarily to be defrayed either by loan, or by a partial diver- sion from their intended object of the funds obtained from the sale of land. These considerations seem to me clearly to establish the inexpediency of laying down so strictly, as the Honourable Member would recommend, the princple, that money obtained by the sale of land is to be reserved for the encouragement of emigration, but I think there is a still stronger objection to that part of the resolutions, in which it is proposed that for this pur- pose the revenue derived from that source should be anticipated. I might leave this part of the case upon the admission of the Honourable Member for Bridport,who, though he supports the resolutions, has yet shewn the inexpediency of adopting without much more enquiry than has yet been bestowed upon the sub- ject, the principle of anticipating the revenue in the manner which has been suggested. But I must add that I think the course proposed would be in the highest degree imprudent, be- cause if the number of emigrants were to be at once so much increased there would be considerable danger, that moro might arrive at one time than it would be possible adequately to pro- vide for. Should this occur great distress and difficulty would be occasioned to the emigrants of which the most exaggerated 80 ?f:i?>: 11'! 1J^ J i » 'f' I. accounts would be circulated, and thus the disposition to emigrate, which is now so strong in this country, would receive a check from which it might not for many years recover. Those who remember the effect produced in discouraging emigration lo Canada by the distress and suffering to which the emigrants were exposed in 18:J2, by the unfortunate breaking out of cholera at Quebec and Montreal, and the panic which the disease created, will perceive how important it is, that no similar interruption should occur in the progress of emigration to Australia. Bearing this in mind I must believe that upon further consideration, the Honourable Member himself will agree with me in thinking, that it would be unwise to increase in the manner he has proposed the number of emigrants who are sent to Australia ; and when he reflects that the present population of New South Wales being only about 100,000 my Rig^ht Honourable Friend has stated that it has received in the last year an addition by emigration of about 10,000 persons, or an increase of 10 per cent, he must concur with me in thinking that this is as fast as it is yet prudent to go. If we allow things to take their natural course the labour of the emigrants already sent out will increase the resources of the colony, and thus each year the funds for emigration and tlie means of receiving and providing for the emigrants on their arrival will increase ; while if we do not produce confusion and distress by attempting unduely to hasten the flow of the current, we may calculate that the emigrants will iu general succeed and prosper and that their letters to their friends and relations in this countiy will be the most effective =<'mulants to further emigration. I must add rs another reason for abstaining from the attempt to in- crease emigration by means of a loan, instead of leaving the stream to become stronger and more rapid by degrees, that I believe, even now, the agent for emigration does not find the number of eligible candidates for emigration to New South Wales much to exceed that for which with the funds at his disposal, he is enabled to provide tue means of conveyance. For these reasons, I trust the Honourable Member will not 81 on to eceive cover, -aginp' upon If will press the House to adopt the resolutions he has moved ; and if he should be inclined to do so, I hope at least he will make some change in the words as they at present stand. Tiiese words, I perceive, contain a declaration that laud in the colonies should be sold at a *' fixed, uniform, and sufficient price ;" but the Honourable Member in his speech has not given us a single reason for establishing a rule, which, at first sight at least, appears so contrary to every principle of justice and of common sense, as that of affixing the same price to all land, however it may vary in fertility and in natural advantages. Why, I would ask, is this to be ? One piece of land may possess the advantage of water frontage, which renders it far more valuable to the occupier than another ; one allotment may have a much more productive soil than that which is next to it. Surely, therefore, it is reasonable that there should be some difference in the price of land, of which the coni})arative value is subject to such extreme variations. If one uniform and arbitrary price should be affixed to all land, whatever may be its quality, we should once more give rise to all those complaints and difficulties which arose under the system of grants. I well remember how im- possible it was, under that system, to give satisfaction to the parties to whom grants were made ; each man thought that his neighbour's allotment was better than his own, and there was no end to the dissatisfaction that was created, and to the com- plaints and applications to change one piece of land for another which were continually pressed upon the attention both of the Governors of the Colonies and of the Secretary of State. All these diiHculties have now been effectually got rid of by the simple expedient of public sale and free competition, but they would all ugaiu recur, if we were to adopt the principle recom- mended in the resolutions, of affixing one uniform and fixed price to all land, v^-hatever might be its natural advantages. In conclusion, I have only to repeat, that the resolutions which the Honourable Member has moved are not called for by any practical necessity, and that, in their present shape, they are liable to serious objections. I trust, therefore, that he will agree with me, that it is better for the success of that policy which he has advocated, and for which I am not less sincerely anxious than himself, that he should be satisfied with the dis- cussion which has taken place, without pressing his motion to a division, which, I fear, would not look very well in our votes to-morrow. I s ( t . m 83 MR. WARD'S REPLY. I was aware, Sir, that, in bringing forward the Motion, which has occupied so much of your time, one of the difficulties, with which I should have to contend, would be its novelty, and the startling nature of some of the propositions contained in it, to which few men become reconciled without a deeper examination of the subject than Members of this House in general have time to enter upon. With the Noble Lord, the Member for Nor- thumberland, who perfectly understands the principle, upon which the new system of Colonization rests, I differ principally as to the possibility of carrying it out without the aid of an Act of Parliament, which I hold to be indispensable. The Noble Lord, indeed, disputes the necessity of Loans ; but, I must beg to remind him that Loans in anticipation of the land-sales, are just as much a part of the theory developed in the works, upon which he has bestowed so high, and just an eulogiura, as any of those other parts, which he himself adopts. My Right Honourable Friend the Under-Secretary for the Colonies, has grati^c'^ ne much by not attempting any defence of the old system, which I denounced. He admits its enonnities, but says that they never can return. I wish I could think so, but the passage which, by an unfortunate lapsus lingucSf my Right Honourable Friend read from the despatch of Sir George Gipps, proves that Colonial Governors are just as much inclined as ever to keep a control over the Land revenue, " as the only disposable fund upon which the Colonial Executive can draw in an emergency.'* Now it was this very feeling in Canada, that destroyed the sinews of our strength there, and led to the very abuses, which my Right Honourable Friend has condemned ; and unless the Colonial Governors are limited to a small, fixed, pro- portion of the Larid revenue in their casual demands, and com- pelled to employ the remainder in Emigration, those abuses will be repeated, with the best intentions no doubt, under the present Government, as under all thof.e that have proeeded it,, This is the principal difference between us. With regard to m p T; M W;' >n ml m 1 . Auction, if he wish to produce the greatest possible amount of money from land, there is a great deal in what he has alleged. If he wish to produce the proper proportion between land and people in the Colony, he will find Auction decidedly inferior, as a system, to the fixed and uniform price. In what he has said respecting South Australia, he must allow me to set him right. There has been no change of principle, or system, there, since the Act of 1834 was passed, but as the Commissioners, (for the security of the emigrants), find it expedient to pay only one half of the passage-money in advance, and have consequently one moiety of the Emigration fund always idle upon their hands, for twelve months at a time, they took power last Session, to make advances from the Emigration fund to the Revenue fund, from time to time, in order to avoid the necessity of borrowing money at 10 per cent. These advances, however, are repaid within the year, the Commissioners regarding it as their most sacred duty to maintain inviolate the principle of applying to Emigration the whole proceeds of the Land sales, without deduction of any kind. Sir, I have already trespassed too largely upon the indulgence of the House to weary it with any fartl: ^r details, and shall only now add, that if I had brought forward t ..s question at an earlier period of the Session, I should not have shrunk from testing by a division the soundness of my principles j but, as I have admitted the impossibility of legislating this year, I shall leave the matter now in the hands of the Government, hoping that it will be so dealt with during the Recess as to make it unnecessary for me, or any other independent member, again to take it up. I shall, therefore, beg leave to withdraw my Resolutions, and content myself, for the present, with the hope that they have been the means of bringing, for the first time, a most important subject fairly under the consideration of the House. THE END. n MOBlf AM AMD SKISIT, PBIMTEBS, MAIDEN LAMK, COVBMT OABDEH. nt of jged. and f as a said right, since r the half ' one s, for [nake from loney n the duty in the kind, ^ence only arlier rbya nitted latter be so r me, s, and have ortant ^^