IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 /> 
 
 
 <^ 
 
 1.0 
 
 I.I 
 
 UiK» |2.J 
 
 ■50 ■^~ mlBE 
 
 la. 
 
 
 1.25 |||.4 1.6 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 6" 
 
 ► 
 
 
 
 '/ 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 23 WIST MAIN STREIT 
 
 WEBSTER, N.Y. 14SS0 
 
 (716) 872-4503 
 

 
 % 
 
 r/. 
 
 di 
 
 
 ^^J"^ 
 
 '^ 
 
 p 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiquas 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notca/Notcfl techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute hat attempted to obtain the beet 
 original copy available for filming. Features of thie 
 copy which may t>e bibliogrephically unique, 
 which may alter any of the imeges in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covere/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 r~~1 Covers damagi^d/ 
 
 D 
 
 Couverture endommagte 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur^ et/ou peiliculAe 
 
 r^ Cover title missing/ 
 
 titre de couverture manque 
 
 loured maps/ 
 Cartes giographiques en couldur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue 
 
 Encre de couleur (I.e. autre que bieue ou noire) 
 
 |~~| Coloured maps/ 
 
 I I Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 
 I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 
 El 
 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 ReilA avec d'autres documents 
 
 rri Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 along Interior margin/ 
 
 La r« Mure serrte peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 
 distortion le long de la marge IntArieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, 
 male, lorsque cela Atait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas M filmtes. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires supplAmentaires: 
 
 L'Institut a minrofilmA le meilleur exempiaire 
 qu'il lui a 4t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exempiaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mAthode normale de filmago 
 sont indiqute ci-dessous. 
 
 I — I Coloured pagee/ 
 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagAes 
 
 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaurtes et/ou pelliculAes 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages dAcolortes, tachettes ou piqutes 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d^tachtes 
 
 r^ Showthrough/ 
 
 Transparence 
 
 Quality of prir 
 
 Quality InAgaie de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary materii 
 Comprend du materiel suppltfmentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Mition disponible 
 
 r~pr Quality of print varies/ 
 
 I I Includes supplementary material/ 
 
 I — I Only edition available/ 
 
 D 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totaiement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata. une pelure, 
 etc., ont M filmtes A nouveau de fapon 6 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est filmA au taux de rMuetion indiqu* ci-dessous. 
 
 10X 14X 18X 22X 
 
 MX 
 
 30X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 v/ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 16X 
 
 20X 
 
 24X 
 
 2BX 
 
 32X 
 
 The copy f 11 
 to the genei 
 
 Csna 
 
 The imeges 
 possible coi 
 of the origii 
 filming com 
 
 Original eof 
 beginning v 
 the last peg 
 sion, or the 
 other origin 
 first psge v« 
 sion, and er 
 or illustrate 
 
 The last rec 
 shall cental 
 TINUED"), ( 
 whichever i 
 
 Maps, plata 
 different rei 
 entirely inci 
 beginning ii 
 right and to 
 required. Tl 
 method: 
 
cemplaire 
 ir. Lea details 
 I uniquaa du 
 uvant modifiar 
 nt axigar una 
 ala da ffilmaga 
 
 tad/ 
 ilAaa 
 
 foxad/ 
 )u piqutea 
 
 rial/ 
 mentaira 
 
 urad by arrata 
 rafilmad to 
 
 8/ 
 
 allamant 
 rata, una palura, 
 u da fa9on A 
 isibla. 
 
 30X 
 
 32X 
 
 Tha copy filmad hara hat baan raproducad thanka 
 to tha ganaroaity of: 
 
 Mttropditan Toronto Library 
 Canadian Hittory Dapartmant 
 
 Tha imagas appaaring hara ara tha baat quality 
 poaaibia conaidaring tha condition and lagiblllty 
 of tha original copy and in kaaping with tha 
 filming contract apacificationa. 
 
 Original copiaa in printad papar covara ara filmad 
 baginning with tha front covar and anding on 
 tha laat paga with a printad or illuatratad impraa- 
 aion, or tha back covar whan appropriata. All 
 othar original copiaa ara filmad baginning on tha 
 firat paga with a printad or illuatratad impraa- 
 aion, and anding on tha laat paga with a printad 
 or illuatratad impraaaion. 
 
 Tha laat racordad frama on aach microficha 
 ahall contain tha aymboi — ^- (moaning "CON- 
 TINUED "), or tha symbol ▼ (moaning "END"), 
 whichavar applias. 
 
 Maps, platas. charts, ate. may ba filmad at 
 diffarant raduction ratioa. Thoaa too larga to ba 
 antiraly includad in ona axposura ara filmad 
 baginning in tha uppar laft hand cornar, laft to 
 right and top to bottom, as many framaa aa 
 raquirad. Tha following diagrams illustrata tha 
 mathod: 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 L'axamplaira fiimA fut raproduit grAca k la 
 ginAroait* da: 
 
 Mstropolitan Toronto Library 
 Canadian Hittory Dapartmant 
 
 Las imagas suivantas ont 6t€ raproduitas avac la 
 plus grand soin. compta tanu da la condition at 
 da la nattat* da l'axamplaira film*, at an 
 conformity avac las conditions du contrat da 
 fiimaga. 
 
 Laa axamplairas originaux dont la cof jvartura 9n 
 papiar ast ImprimAa sont filmto •(% commandant 
 par la pramiar plat at an tarminant soit par la 
 darniira paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 d'impraaaion ou d'illuatration, soit par la sacond 
 plat, salon la cas. Tous las autras axamplairas 
 originaux sont filmAs an commandant par la 
 pramlAra paga qui comporta una amprainta 
 d'impraaaion ou d'illuatration at 9n tarminant par 
 la darnlAra paga qui comporta una talla 
 amprainta. 
 
 Un das symbolas suivants apparaftra sur la 
 darniAra imaga da chaqua microficha, salon la 
 cas: la symbols ^-^ signifia "A SUIVRE", la 
 symbols V signifia "FIN". 
 
 Las cartas, planchas, tablaaux, ate pauvant Atra 
 filmte A das taux da reduction diff Grants. 
 Lorsqua la document ast trop grand pour Atra 
 raproduit an un saul ciichA. il ast fiimA A partir 
 da I'angia supAriaur gaucha, da gaucha A droita, 
 at da haut an bas. an pranant la nombra 
 d'imagas nAcassaira. Las diagrammas suivants 
 illustrant la mAthoda. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
/f 
 
 The Church's Warfare 
 
 A SERMON 
 
 TRKACHEI) BEFORE THE SYNOD OK THE DIOCESE 
 
 OF TORONTO, IN ST. JAMES' CATHEDRAL, 
 
 ON TUESDAY, THE I4TII OF 
 
 JUNE, 1892. 
 
 BY 
 
 THE REV. J. LANGTRY, D.C.L, 
 
 RECTOR OF S. LUKE'S CHURCH, TORONTO, 
 
 'Vublisbed at the request and expense of some who 
 
 beard it. 
 
 TORONTO : 
 TiMMs & Co., Printers, 13 Adelaide Street East. 
 
 i* 
 
 1892. 
 
i I'i 
 
 ®he ®l)urch'0 ^at-fave 
 
 ^ 
 
 "That ye stand fast In one spirit, with one mind, striving together for the 
 faith of the Gospel."— Phil. 1-27. 
 
 No one can rejul St. Paul's Epistles attentively, without being 
 struck by the fact, that they are full of illustrations, drawn from the 
 battlefield, the- stadium, and the arena. Indeed it has beed com- 
 mented upon as a matter of surprise and reproach, that the chief 
 herald of the Gospel of peace, should have hjul his eyes closetl, as it were, 
 to the teaching of nature in heaven above, and on the earth beneath, 
 and should have moved so constantly as he does, amid the imagery of 
 war and confl! b. The Christian in his apprehension is, before every- 
 thing else, a soldier of Jesus Christ ; as such, his business is to tight. 
 And if he would not prove himself a coward in the day (»f battle, he 
 must prepare himself to endure hardness. He is exhorted to light the 
 good fight of faith, and lay hold on eternal life — to wage a gtXHl war- 
 fare, holding faith, and a good conscience — earnestly to contend for 
 the faith once delivered to the saints. His course is a race, a wrestle, 
 a pugilistic encounter, in which the utmost watchfulness, skill, and 
 energy, must be used, if he would not be defeated and overcome. 
 And so everywhere throughout the Epistles, we hear the clang of the 
 soldier's arms, and see the agony of the athlete's efforts. We have, if I 
 mistake not, two of these illustrations implied in the text, the word 
 stekefa, star i fast, calls up before our minds, the picture of a battal- 
 ion or an army, standing firm and unbroken against the assaults of their 
 foes. And the words atmuthlounteti, striving together, carries us away 
 to the stadium to witness over again the fixed purpose, the desperate 
 effort, the unflagging energy of those who ran in a race, or the 
 struggle, and the agony of those who engaged in the wrestle or the 
 pugilistic encounter. This is the picture which St. Paul presents to 
 us of the life to which we are called, and this, as a moment's reflection 
 will show us, instead of being as has been supposed, an incongruity in 
 the great Apostle's life, is one of those undesigned harmonies, which 
 go to establish the authenticity of the Epistles. The pictures he drew 
 were but the reflection of his own life's experiences And the exhor- 
 tations which he addressed to others, were but the echo of the voices 
 that were ever sounding in his own ears. His life was, as he has told us, 
 one long agony and battle for the faith of the gospel — lived among the 
 tumult of angry mobs, confronted everywhere with stonings, and 
 
ite 
 
 together for the 
 
 without being 
 awn from the 
 jjis beed ctnn- 
 that the chief 
 »se(l, as it were, 
 tjarth beneath, 
 the imagery of 
 i, before every- 
 less is to fight, 
 ly of l)attle, he 
 ted to light the 
 ;e a gtXHl war- 
 to contend for 
 race, a wrestle, 
 ness, skill, ami 
 and overcome. 
 le clang of the 
 . We have, if I 
 text, the word 
 re of a battal- 
 iissaults of their 
 carries us away 
 , the desperate 
 a race, or the 
 wrestle or the 
 lul presents to 
 lent's reflection 
 incongruity in 
 rmonies, which 
 ctures he drew 
 Lud the exhor- 
 lo of the voices 
 he has told us, 
 ived among the 
 stonings, and 
 
 shipwreck, and stripes, and bonds, and imprisonments, and ravenotts 
 beasts, and deaths oft, fightings within, and fears without. And so, 
 when the conflict was practically over, and the end nearing, he sums uphis 
 apprehension of what he had passed through with the exulting cry, 
 " 1 have fought a good fight, T have flnished my course, I have kept 
 the faith." Nor is this view of the Christian's lite peculiar to St. Paul. 
 It runs through the entire New Testjiment, and is plainly enough pro- 
 claimed by our Blessed Lord Himself. I am not come to send peace 
 on earth, but a sword. A man'.'* foes shall be they of his own house- 
 hold. I send you forth as sheep among wolves. Ye shall be hated 
 of all men for my sake and the Gospel. Yea, the time is coming, when 
 whosover killeth you, will think h > doeth God service. But he that 
 endureth to the end shall be saved. Straight is the gate and narrow 
 is the way. Strive to enter in. Conflict and strife and peril are His 
 representations of the life to which He has called His followers. And in 
 the closing book of the canon, which pourtrays the history of the Church 
 to the end. He himself is pictured as going forth to war, the armies 
 of heaven following Him, amid scenes of conflict, battle, and blood, to 
 the end. And what these figures imply, and these predictions proclaim, 
 has been, as you know, abundantly fulfilled in the history of the 
 Church. What a picture does the record of her life unfold as we look 
 back over it ! Victory and defeat, success and failure, humiliation 
 and triumph, have been strangely intermingled in her whole career. 
 Who can realize now the awfulsignificanceof the baptism of blood, during 
 those ten long persecutions, by which she had infused into her the 
 spirit of steadfast endurance ! Who can understand the humiliation 
 and anguish of mind endure'.? by those who were striving together 
 amid overwhelming multit ,»t- i heathen, for the faith of the Gospel, 
 when the Docetic, Arian, ana Macedonan heresies arose and spread, 
 and for a while triumphed. And who can fail, from our bitter experience, 
 to understand something of the humiliation, and weakness, and dis- 
 heartenment, which faithful men knew, when on mere questions of 
 discipline, the Montinist, Novation and Donatist schisms rent the 
 Christian host, and embittered the hearts, and the lives, of Christian 
 men. You know how the worldliness and superstition and debase- 
 ment, and then the unl)elief, fignosti. xsm and atheism have continued 
 the conflict, and fulfilled the predictions down to our own times. 
 
 I hs re thought it well, my brethren, to recall to your remem- 
 lierance at the outset this predicted and verified character of the 
 Church's History. For I am persuaded that we are entering upon 
 days of great perplexity and peril to the faith of many. The manifold 
 divisions of the Christian host have practically destroyed all authora- 
 tative guidance. And now it is being whispered through the land, 
 that the very foundations, upon which Christians of every name have 
 stood in the past, are being undermined and dug up by the very men 
 who have been set as watchmen on the wall. No wonder, therefore, 
 that they who have but little knowledge of the history of the past, 
 and of the trials of Faith, which it enfolds, and who have looked for 
 peiM^ and sure guidance in the Kingdom of Christ, should be perplexed 
 
 i ■'. 
 
 l- 
 
 *f 
 
! ! 
 
 and (liHinayed, oh thoy Uxik out upon the Rpectacle of the divided and 
 distracte<l Christendom of to-day. In the face of this danger it is 
 surely well for us to reinendjer that no new thing is happening unto 
 us. Nothing that was not forseen and foretold, that the trial of our 
 Faith is the key to the i)erplexities of life, that we are called not to 
 j)eace but to war — that we are soldiers t»f Christ, and the time of 
 victory is not yet It is said by those who have experience, that the 
 surprises, reverses and disappointments of the battlefield are l)eyond 
 all conception amazing and distressing. The light wing or the left, 
 has made a desperate charge and is sweeping all liefore it, when 
 wtM'd comes that the centre has [teen crushed, and is falling back in 
 disorder. A seeming victory is in an instant turned into defeat. 
 And often when all seems lost, tiiumph is at hand ; or in another 
 departnient, a fortress hjis l)een made impregnable when lo, it is dis- 
 covered that it has been undermined by the enemy. It has been thus 
 in the conflicts of the Church, in the centuries past ; it will be so in 
 the years to come. Let us not then be discouraged by any dangers or 
 disasters that may threaten our time. We are still in the swirl of tlie 
 battle. It will often be ours not to reason why — but just to do our 
 best and die. We know that we are soldiers in the army of Him who 
 has gone forth conqueriny and to conquer. But enough of generalities. 
 Let me invite your attention to what I consider to be the special 
 dangers of our time. The enemies against whose Jissaults we hav^e to 
 stand fast, and upon whom we must wage war. They are tracable to 
 one source, the creeping materialism of the age, the growing spirit of 
 unbelief in the supernatural. But let us confront them as they present 
 themselves to us in the open plain. 
 
 Now the first and greatest danger of the present time is, I am per- 
 suaded, the renewed and wide-spread attack that is being made 
 upon the integrity, and therefore upon the authority of the Bible. 
 From the first general council of the Church at Nicea to the present 
 hour, when any matter of faith or morality was in dispute, the first 
 question asked was, " what saith the Scripture ? The testimony and 
 authority of the Church were invoked to settle what was Scripture, 
 and to witness to the intended meaning of Scripture, which is Scripture ; 
 but when once the canon was settled, and the true meaning ascertained, 
 the voice of Inspiration was an end of all controversy. But now, through 
 the spread of what calls itself scientific or higher criticism, the 
 most ancient and uniform testimony of the Church is ruthlessly flung 
 aside. We are practically told that there is no canon. The integrity, the 
 genuineness, and the authenticity of a large part of the Bible are 
 denied. And we are lieing taught that we must determine by some 
 internal verifying faculty, some real or imaginary testimoniunt Spiritus 
 Sancti, what part o^ the remnant that is left is inspired, and what is 
 not. The Penteteuch, they tell us, was not written by Moses. It is a 
 mere compilation patched together from previously existing docu- 
 ments by some unknown Jewish writer in the days of Manasseh or 
 Josiah. Its earlier narratives, before the call of Abraham, are of the 
 nature of myths; myth being defined to be the product of mental 
 
 activity not i 
 
 or, in other 
 
 what is fact 
 
 book of Deut< 
 
 but not writt 
 
 it claims to h 
 
 never took pi 
 
 tabernacle of 
 
 existence, ex< 
 
 years afterwa 
 
 of the Tempi 
 
 elaborate fict 
 
 delled accord 
 
 •were falsified 
 
 Levi had beei 
 
 dated from tl 
 
 that the Psa 
 
 David, but b 
 
 and that the 
 
 hundred yea 
 
 writes Bisht 
 
 " should mee 
 
 and startling 
 
 considerable 
 
 occupying hi 
 
 But it is so ' 
 
 length of th 
 
 subject in a i 
 
 Gore, for ins 
 
 lessen -unset' 
 
 of Christ ; *' 
 
 intentions D 
 
 patible with 
 
 says, with n 
 
 the English 
 
 always be s 
 
 accept any r 
 
 Dr. Driver, 
 
 of ourselves 
 
 of Wellhaus 
 
 in his intr 
 
 extravagant 
 
 Kuenen wa 
 
 by Colenso 
 
 and introdi 
 
 Ranan. B 
 
 any narrati 
 
 prophecy oi 
 
 consideratic 
 
divided and 
 
 danger it is 
 
 ppening unto 
 
 e trial of our 
 
 called not to 
 
 the time of 
 
 Mice, that th«' 
 
 d are l)eyond 
 
 g oi- the left, 
 
 ore it, when 
 
 Uing back in 
 
 into defeat. 
 
 or in another 
 
 n lo, it is dis- 
 
 has been thus 
 
 will be 8o in 
 
 any dangers or 
 
 he swirl of the 
 
 ust to do our 
 
 y of Him who 
 
 of generalities. 
 
 be t)ie special 
 
 ilts we hav^e to 
 
 ire tracabie to 
 
 owing spirit of 
 
 as they present 
 
 le is, I am per- 
 is being made 
 of the Bible. 
 bo the present 
 ipute, the first 
 testimony and 
 was Scripture, 
 jh is Scripture ; 
 ig ascertained, 
 i now, through 
 criticism, the 
 uthlessly flung 
 3 integrity, the 
 the Bible are 
 rmine by some 
 mium Spiritus 
 \, and what is 
 iloses. It is a 
 sxisting docu- 
 l Manasseh or 
 am, are of the 
 iuct of mental 
 
 activity not yet distinguished into history and poetry and philo8«)phy; 
 or, in other words, a compilation in which it is impossible to tell 
 what is fact and what mere fancy. Practically they tell us that the 
 book of Deuteronomy is a fiction, founded, perhaps, on floating tradition, 
 but not written for eight or nine hundred years after the date at which 
 it claims to have been written. That the whole solemn scene of Sinai 
 never took place, that the Law was not given by GcmI at all, that the 
 tabernacle of witness, and everything connected with it, had never any 
 existence, except in the fabricated history, written nearly a thousand 
 years afterwards. That so far from the Tabernacle being the prototype 
 of the Temple, it was the Temple that suggested the delilierato and 
 elaborate fiction of the Tabernacle. That the older Bo<jks were remo- 
 delled according to the Mosaic form ; and that Chronicles especially 
 were falsified by Priests and Levites to sustain a l)elief that the tribe of 
 Levi had been set apart from the days of Moses, and that the Priesthood 
 dated from that time (Bishop Ellicott's charge) ; — They tell us fui'ther 
 that the Psalms, with perhaps one exception, were not written by 
 David, but by some one, unknown, at the end of the Babylonian Exile 
 and that the Book of Daniel is practically a forgery, written at least four 
 hundred years after the death of the prophet ; " That such a view, 
 writes Bishop Ellicott, in his now famous Christius Comprobator, 
 " should meet with acceptance in any Christian country, is sad enough 
 and startling enough ; but that it should meet with acceptance to a 
 considerable extent, at the hands of members of our own Church, 
 occupying high positions, is full of very sad augury for the future. 
 But it is so " It is true that the English advocates do not go the full 
 length of their (ler^nan teachers, they for the most part approach the 
 subject in a reverent, believing spirit. The aim of some of them, Mr. 
 Gore, for instance, as he tells us, was simply to remove perplexity, to 
 lessen ninsettlement ; to enable earnest encjuirers to rest in the Faith 
 of Christ ; " to succour a distressed Faith." But in spite of his good 
 intentions Dr. Liddon at once denounced his concessions as not com- 
 patible with loyalty to our Lord Jesus Christ. And Bishop Ellicott 
 says, with reference to the moderation of statement so far observed by 
 the English advocates of this new departure, " this however, may 
 always be said — that the tendency of unbalanced minds is — if thfy 
 accept any modified view — to pass onward to the unmodified." Besides, 
 Dr. Driver, the leader of the English section, has, we are told by one 
 of ourselves who knows his position, frankly endorsed the conclusions 
 of Wellhausen and Kuenen. He has almost copied Knoble's preface 
 in his introduction. And these are the authors of the monstrously 
 extravagant statements about the Bible which I have given above. 
 Kuenen was translated into English and introduced to English readers 
 by Colenso as justifying his position. He was translated into French 
 and introduced to the French people, as endorsing his position, by 
 Ranan. Both these writers start with the a priori assumption that 
 any narrative that implies the supernatural, that is, that contains a 
 prophecy or the account of a miracle, is to be rejected, without further 
 consideration, as a myth or fiction or forgery. 
 
 i: 
 
6 
 
 u 
 
 I 
 
 , !P 
 
 "The real harm, then," writes Bish* p Ellicott, " that has Ijeen (lone 
 by recent English writers lies in the plain fact that they have actually 
 prepared the way for shaken and unstable minds to arrive at results 
 which will at last l>e found to involve inability to accept the super- 
 mitural, and so lead to a complete shipwreck of faith" 
 
 I am quite aware that this is not what they intend or desire. 
 They speak in glowing terms of the inspiration and authority of the 
 Bible, and express their belief that tlie disencumbered faith will glow 
 out more brightly than ever when their work of criticism is finished. 
 But what kind of inspiration, I would ask, could we assign to a l)ook 
 made up to a large extent, at least, of myths and ttctions and forgeries ; 
 whose solemn divine enactments, as we have believed them to 
 be, turn out, we are told, to be only the expression of cumulated 
 human wisdom? What authoritv would such enactments have for the 
 selfish, the tempted, and the weak ? And, indeed, when we come to 
 enquire what they mean by all this fine languige about inspiration, we 
 find that their definition of it would make every man his own inspired 
 teacher, law giver and guide. " We determine the inspiration of the 
 Book," writes r e of them, who seems to be speaking for the whole com- 
 pany " from its internal character, and the voice of the Holy Spirit speak- 
 ing in it to the believer." In a word, the settlement of this vital question 
 becomes wholly subjective, a mere matter of individual feeling. The 
 testimony of the Church, the canonicity of the Book, the judgment 
 of Catholic writers, the authority of the Lord Jesus Christ, must all 
 become as nothing ; the judgment of the individual who, whatever his 
 character may be, is at liberty to assume that the Holy Ghost is speak- 
 ing to him, is the sole arbiter. " It is not now," writes Dr. Morgan 
 Dix, " so much a question of historic testimony and external evidence, 
 but the implement for settling date and authorship is human intuition. 
 The firm ground of history is abandoned for that of theory, impression 
 and conjecture," And so, as the Essay and Revicv^ people taught long 
 ago " truth will vary according to the individual who is looking for it." 
 " Nothing," writes Bishop Ellicott, " is more melancholy in this whole 
 controversy than the reckless manner in which the judgment of the 
 Church, which the Apostle declares to be the ground and pillar of the 
 truth, is set aside by Christian teachers in endeavoring to find some 
 new basis for belief in God's Holy Word. 
 
 No one can seriously consider all that the new teachers are present- 
 ing for our acceptance without feeling that, in the first place, they are 
 going to give us, instead of the Word of Life, a topsy-turvy Bible, 
 beginning, as some of them tell us, with the Minor Prophets, and even 
 in its fragments, deprived of all divine and constraining authority. 
 No one, I venture to think, can ponder the lucid statement of this 
 whole question by Principal Cave, the powerful argument of Stanley 
 Leathes, the dispassionate and masterful consideration of the more than 
 four hundred endorsations of the Old Testament contained in the New, 
 by Bishop Ellicott, the powerful protest of Canon Liddon, the two 
 able articles in the Church Quarterly for January, 1892, without feel- 
 ing that the whole truth of God is involved in this discussion, and that 
 
m8 Ijeeii (loiif 
 have actually 
 fvo at results 
 fcpt the super- 
 
 nd or desire, 
 hority of tin* 
 [lith will glow 
 in is finished, 
 ign to a l)ook 
 nd forgeries ; 
 ed them t(» 
 •f cumulated 
 have for the 
 n we come to 
 ispiration, we 
 own inspired 
 ration of the 
 e whole com- 
 y Spirit speak- 
 i vital question 
 feeling. The 
 the judgment 
 hrist, must all 
 , whatever his 
 i host is speak- 
 !S Dr. Morgan 
 rnal evidence, 
 man intuition, 
 ry, impression 
 le taught long 
 looking for it." 
 ' in this whole 
 gment of the 
 1 pillar of the 
 I, to find some 
 
 's are present- 
 'lace, they are 
 -turvy Bible, 
 lets, and even 
 ig authority, 
 sment of this 
 it of Stanley 
 ;he more than 
 \ in the New, 
 Ion, the two 
 without feel- 
 Jion, and that 
 
 the concossions <hat we heingg rashly made are inconsisteiit with Ih'liet' 
 in our Lord Himself as our Infallihle Teacher and (iui*le. 
 
 When we encjuire what are the reasons for this tren..Mulous change 
 A front, the answers that are given are far from being clear or satis- 
 factory. Canon Driver says that it is im{X)ssible to tell us how he 
 has arrived at the results which he so unhesitatingly accepts (Pre. p. ix). 
 We are only told that schfilars have proved the conclusions an- 
 nounced. That all critics are agreed almut the composite character, 
 for instance, of the Hexateuch, thenumWr and order of the documents 
 quoted, the modern date of the different parts of the Bible, and that 
 they have retvched results that are scientiHcally sure. " The 'Critic " 
 writes Moi-gan Dix again, when, asked how he has made these 
 astounding discoveries, replies, "my criticism proves them, modern 
 learning estaV)lishes them ; they are the ascertained lesults of the 
 best thought of the day," and yet they are nothing Ijetter than guess- 
 work and fancy. They are the result of the process correctly descriljed 
 as "free conjecture operating upon the sacred text." And s«j, when 
 we enquire further, we find that scholarship is not specially involved. 
 That literary criteria, according to the confession of their leaders, are 
 altogether unreliable. That the conclusions do not, to any large extent, 
 depend upon linguistic distinctions, but upon the contents of the 
 Books and their history ; so that it is not the knowledge of specialists 
 which others cannot grasp which is alleged i:^ justification of this 
 tremendous change. 
 
 Then, — as was abundantly proved by Principal Wace, in his 
 masterful reply to Huxley's savage attack upon Christianity — on 
 the ground of the conclusions of the higher criticism, and more 
 recently by the second essay in the Church Quarterlif, the scholars and 
 critics, so far from bein<r agreed, are at hopeless contradiction on 
 almost all the points that are claimed to be settled. So that when 
 Principal Grant announces that he feels bound to accept the conclus- 
 ions of these specialists, we may ask him which specialists 1 Those who 
 say that the writer of the Penteteuch copied from two documents, or 
 those who say that he must have had three ; or those who insist that 
 there were four of those who say that there were none. Must we ac- 
 cept the conclusions of those critics who assert that the Priests Code, 
 as they call it, was the oldest of iihese decuments or of those who say 
 that it was the latest, or those who say that the Psalms were written 
 during the exile, or of those who say that they were written after the 
 time of the Maccabees. Surely with this beautiful unanimity we are 
 at liberty to believe any of them we like, or far better for the present 
 at least to withhold believe from them all. 
 
 Then further we find that these scientifically certain results are not 
 scientific at all. They have not been reached by the scientific method 
 of careful collection of facts and extended induction. They are mere 
 theories. Each writer adopts the conclusions of his favorite precede- 
 cessor and then tells that all scholars are agreed. That critics have 
 proved what he says. He however takes good care to rule out of the 
 category of critics, all who have adopted a diflferent theory from his 
 
 ■51 
 
8 
 
 own. HcngsU'nljerjyf, Euwaki, Keil, Kurtz and even DeleitZNclj are coii- 
 teiiiptuously <'X[)elle(l from the company of the critics, and after all 
 Dr. Driver's main positi(»n as to the hitedate of the Priest;s C<Kle is only 
 endorsed by three critics Wellhausen, Kuenen and (.Jrabe — -And yet 
 ujKin this the whole fal)ric of his destiuctive criticism is based. 
 
 T ask your attention brethein to these facts that you may not Ix; 
 dismayed by the rash and confident assertions of these new teachers. 
 
 1 am (juite aware that some of you, who are listening to me are 
 saying in your hearts, wliat f<»lly ! what an ill judged thing, to bring 
 this subject b'^fore a general assembly like tliis, and so liefore the 
 public. It is only calculated to awaken needless alarm and to create 
 a panic in the public mind — I can only say, Brethren, that I am not 
 responsible for bringing the ({uestion l)efore the public — The new 
 opinions are being sedulously propagated by every possible agency, in 
 Ser*nons, in Reviews, in Magazines, in Newspapers, in Novels and in 
 College halls. And I want to sound the alarm. I want to create a panic, 
 I want to put unsuspecting Christians on their guard, I want them to 
 know that this insidious attack which deprecates alarm does not rest 
 upcm any such sure foundations as its advocates assume. It is no new 
 thing in the world. It was propounded more than 100 years agj by 
 German sceptical writers. It was known and the foundations on which it 
 rests were known to such masters of Hebrew and theology as Dr. 
 Pusey and Dr. Joseph McCaul and Bishop Wordsworth, and they re- 
 jected it deliberately — yes! and there have been no new facts discovered 
 which give it the overmastering potency which its advocates assume. 
 It is thefashion, just now, like other fashions ; it will have it's season and 
 pass away. But for individual souls, the fashion is full of peril and so 
 I entreat you in the words of the apostle " Stand fast " in the old faith 
 Hold the traditions which teach and have taught from the l)eginning^ 
 that the Bible is God's own inspired word. Let no man's heart fail 
 when he reads strange and painful statements made by learned 
 Hebraists about the Bible and its inspiration. There are many just 
 as learned Hebraists who entirely deny the validity of modern 
 scientific criticism and stand firmly in the old paths. *' The ark is safe' 
 though the oxen may shake it." 
 
 Another great danger of our time against which we must stand 
 fast, and upon which we must wage, war grows out of the same root, 
 and is akin to the last. It is the popular dislike to what is called dogma,^ 
 that is to all positive and distinctive doctrinal teaching ; for dogma is- 
 only the Greek for doctrine, and doctrine is only the statement, in the 
 most exact language we can command, of the facts and truths of Re- 
 velation. " This is a fact," writes Bishop Ryle, in his last charge, 
 " which I am loth to say wants realizing and recognizing far more than 
 has been the case lately. Whether we like to hear or not ; it is a sore 
 disease in the land. It is a pestilence walking in darkness, and 
 threatening the well being of the rising generation ; the evidences 
 of this dislike to positive doctrine are abundant all around us. 
 Look at the subjects of the sermons that are advertised — and the 
 preached sermons that are published, all sorts of popular topics, are- 
 
 treated just as 
 of Christian w( 
 only tli«^ vague 
 the vague ton«' 
 subjects. Tin 
 Christian doct 
 if treated with 
 all Christian 
 l^<ok at the p< 
 doctrine in t 
 Christian is li 
 a root. Then 
 more todenou 
 of intellectual 
 this to have t 
 morality and 
 of this growin 
 very serious ii 
 an inunense a 
 fall into it, to 
 of doctrine, ^v 
 grasp of the < 
 that is in th<fi 
 know what t 
 peril as this t 
 ers to strive 1 
 for the Faiith 
 to l)elieve it, 
 children, to ) 
 tunity. Let 
 worship of C 
 teach clear, ( 
 course an en 
 it reveals Ch 
 guards His j 
 ceptions con( 
 for the Faitl 
 I have s] 
 of Life, and 
 shirk the ba 
 to stand fasi 
 one or the o 
 inch. 
 
 There i 
 growing ou 
 against whi 
 the Cause o 
 alize, natur 
 or the trutl 
 
tzsfh are cuii 
 and after nil 
 « CVnle is only 
 be— And yet 
 ItiiNed. 
 [u may not 1m? 
 w teacherH. 
 !>g to nie arc 
 ing, to biing 
 "» before the 
 lind to create 
 hat I am not 
 ic — Tlie new 
 •le agency, in 
 Novels and in 
 •reate a panic, 
 want them to 
 doe.v not rest 
 It is no new 
 years agj by 
 lis on which it 
 "l<jgy as Dr. 
 and they re- 
 cts discovered 
 )cates assume. 
 it's season and 
 i peril and so 
 1 the old faith 
 he l)eginning 
 "s heart fail 
 by learned 
 re many just 
 of modern 
 e ark is safe 
 
 '■ must stand 
 lesame root, 
 ailed dogma,^ 
 for dogma is- 
 ment, in the 
 ^uths of Re- 
 last charge, 
 ir more than 
 ; it is a sore 
 rkness, and 
 e evidences 
 around us. 
 J — and the 
 topics, are 
 
 9 
 
 treated just as a lieatlien pliilosophor might treat tlieni, with a spice 
 of Christian words and phrases and sentiments thrown in ; but witii 
 only the vaguest si^tting forth of the fiiith »f the (jos|h;I. L«M)k again at 
 the vague tone of our newHpa|H>rH, win they ttmch u|H)n religious 
 subjects. They ai-e always reiwiy to praise Christian morality, but the 
 Christian doctrine u|kmi which that morality is based, if not sneered at, 
 if treated with scant courtesy. See li<tw r<'ady they all are t«» shovel 
 all Christian truth aside under the vague name of ' Sv<ctat-ianism.' 
 [^«/ok at the popular fictions and ntivels, how they avi<Ml anything like 
 doctrine in the potraits they give us of Christians. Their nuMlel 
 Christian is like a cut tlower at a Hower show, a mere bliHim without 
 a root. Then you know how (Hipular siHtakers an; growing more and 
 more todenouncf? all dogmatic statements as tnly f(>ttering the freedom 
 of intellectual activity. There is a morbid unreasoning desire in all 
 this to have the fruits of Christianity without the nntts. Christian 
 morality atul welldoing without Christian doctrine. Theconse«|U(!nces 
 of this growing dislike to positive and distinct doctrinal teaching are 
 very serious in the j)r<went day. It creates and fosters and keei)s up 
 an inunense amount of instability in r<;ligion. Jt exposes those who 
 fall into it, to great jxirils ; tlu^y are tossed to aiul fro by every wind 
 of doctriiui, ever ready for any new thing liecause they have no firm 
 grasp of the old," and utterly unable to reiuler a .'eason of the hop«> 
 thatis in tlufm. They Imvii such dread of dogma that they do not 
 know what they l)elieve or where they stand. It was against such a 
 peril as this that an Apostle wjis guarding, when he called his follow- 
 ers to strive together for the Faith of the Gospel earnestly to contend 
 for the Faith, and so T would entreat you Brethren tt) hold the Faith, 
 to l)elieve it, to teach it, tleHnitely, clearly, unhesitatingly, to your 
 children, to your Congregations, to your neighbors as you have oppor- 
 tunity. Let others catei* for the patronage of the word ; turn the 
 worship of Cod into Sunday entertainment. -But let us resolve to 
 teach clear, distinct and well defined doctrines. Doctrine is not of 
 course an end, Imt only a means to an end. It brings men to Christ, 
 it reveals Christ, enshrines Chi'ist, proclaims His excellent greatness ; 
 guards His pearless honor, saves men from base and unworthy con- 
 cei>tions concerning Him ; therefore, let us resolve to strive together 
 for the Faith of the Gospel. 
 
 I have spoken to you v)f the struggle that is upon us for the Word 
 of Life, and for the Faith once djBlivered to the Saints — we cannot 
 shirk the battle, we cannot avoid the result ; we can, however, resolve 
 to stand fast ; we can determine that they who would rob us of the 
 one or the other will have to fight their way foot by foot, and inch by 
 inch. 
 
 There is another attack peculiar, I think, to our own time, 
 growing out of the same root, and closely allied to the other ; but 
 against which we must stand ever on our guard, if we would not l)etray 
 the Cause of Christ. It is the attempt which is being mode to ration- 
 alize, naturalise, and theorise out of existence, not the Holy Scriptures, 
 or the truth which they teach, but the Church of the living God which 
 
 ('.-It 
 
 / 
 
i 
 
 i T: 
 
 10 
 
 the Apostle declares to be the "ground and pillar," of that truth, and 
 which we profess to believe in as the witness to, and keeper of Holy 
 Writ. 
 
 It was customery with those who in the sixteenth century 
 separated from and assailed the Church, to maintain that Holy 
 Scripture gave positive and detailed directions aiM)ut the constitution 
 and government of the Church ; and those directions, it was main- 
 tained, were cleanly contrary to the historical order of things 
 retained in the Chuich of England. So arrogant, and overbearing 
 were the maintuineis of this new theory, that the great Hooker was 
 fain to cry for quai'ter, and set himself in his immortal book to prove 
 that the ( lovernment of the Church was not necessarily everywhere 
 the same, though his argument proved that it had been always the 
 same, and that same the i-e verse of the conteiition of the Innovators. 
 The calm and exhaustive discussion of this question, that has since 
 taken place has so completely reversed the position of the contending 
 parties that those who maintained that Holy Scripture taught their 
 system, and no other, are now fain to take shelter in the contention 
 that not only does the New Testament t«ach no definite system of 
 organization and government, but that there was no divinely con- 
 stituted (.'hurch at all; that Christ, therefore never fulfilled His promise 
 — "upon this rock / vxUl build my Church." That St. Paul was mis- 
 taken when he proclaimed that He luwl built it upon the foundation of 
 the Apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the head Corner 
 Stt'ne. Tluit He just taught His truth, and wrought His miracles 
 and . ved His life, and died His death, and left them to produce whac- 
 ever e ects they would upon the world, and that the Church instead of 
 having any divine origin or authority grew up in a natural v^'^ay like 
 .any other society. The people who believed Christian doctrine or held 
 Christian sentiment, formed a club, and the club or guild, thought it 
 would be a nice thing like other Cuilds to have a Club meal. The meal had 
 to have a chairman to preside, and waiters to distribute. Under the influ- 
 ence of the superstitious spirit of the next age, we are told the club meal 
 grew into the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper ; the chaiiTnan into the 
 Bishop or the Presbyter ; the waiters into the Deacons. This is the 
 folly that is gravely propounded in Brampton lectures, and taught in 
 Canadian training colleges of young men for the ministry, when it is 
 pointed out that this contention is contrjwlicted by the plain statements 
 of Holy Scripture ; and every child knows that it is contradicted,- -then 
 some of the bolder spirited, a Hatch, or Phleiderer, deny the authen- 
 ticity of the Scriptures, which contradict their theory ; and grave men 
 and earnest, grasp at this desperate remedy rather than abandon the 
 btiseless belief which they have inherited. This is another enemy 
 against which we must stand fast. It is a part of the great revolt of 
 an unbelieving age against the supernatural. Either we mnst abandon 
 the Scriptures as our guide, or we must abandon this contradiction of 
 their plain and oft-repeated statements. It is an evident part of the 
 great enemy's plan of attack at the present time, to set aside not only 
 the guiding light of divine revelation, the guiding voice of the Faith 
 
 once delivered, 
 tuted, to he not 
 God through th 
 for extending 
 activities whic 
 the world one 
 developed out 
 building of Gck 
 of authority v 
 its fellowship li 
 Therefore, s 
 selves like mer 
 not be made tl 
 1 had intei 
 not on the def 
 "standfast" c 
 as presented t< 
 determined, ui 
 our duty now. 
 in the Faith, 
 realizing its ti 
 and then seco 
 bined, concen 
 vieing with oi 
 Lord, and for 
 ing men. T 
 recall. Is ii 
 we not conte 
 make almost 
 and escape t 
 together for 
 coldness am 
 This half-hes 
 people, for ii 
 bet and win 
 money in h» 
 of the bal 
 of what is 
 doubt, but t 
 shame by tl 
 we are falli 
 the noble s 
 Now I 
 upon you v 
 parish or i 
 clergy in m 
 visitors, or 
 about you I 
 anyway re 
 
11 
 
 mt truth, and 
 3eper of Holy 
 
 eenth century 
 in that Holy 
 
 ie constitution 
 
 it was main- 
 
 ier of things 
 
 id overbearing 
 
 at Hooker was 
 book to prove 
 
 ly everywhere 
 
 sn always the 
 
 he Innovators. 
 
 hat has since 
 
 the contending 
 tiiught their 
 
 he contention 
 inite system of 
 [) divinely con- 
 ed His promise 
 
 Paul was mis- 
 3 foundation of 
 le head Corner 
 
 His miracles 
 produce whac- 
 urch instead of 
 itural way like 
 octrine or held 
 ild, thought it 
 
 The meal hfid 
 ^nder the influ- 
 
 theclub meal 
 i-man into the 
 This is the 
 nd taught in 
 y, when it is 
 lin statements 
 dieted,- -then 
 y the authen- 
 nd grave men 
 abandon the 
 other enemy 
 reat revolt of 
 nnst abandon 
 itradiction of 
 It part of the 
 lide not only 
 of the Faith 
 
 once delivered, but the guiding fellowship of the society divinely consti- 
 tuted, to he not only the ground and pillar of the truth, the habitation of 
 God through the Spirit, but the Body of Christ, and s(» the instrument 
 for extending the incarnate life, and of carrying forward all the 
 activities which the energies of that life awakens anumg men. Let 
 the world once l^lieve that the church is only a hi)man device, 
 developed out of human wisilo'n to meet human needs, and not a 
 building of God, which His Spirit created and ccmiinues, and its voice 
 of authority will soon be silenced, its oracles questioned and rejected, 
 its fellowship lightly esteemed and easily forsaken. 
 
 Thei'efore, stand fast against this third insidious foe and quit your- 
 selves like men who can read and think for themselves, and who will 
 not be made the dupes of any blind leader of the Blind. 
 
 1 had intended, when I Viegan tliis sermr»n, to speak t«» you chiefly, 
 not on the defensive side of the Christian warfare as enjoined in the 
 "standfast" of the text; but of the j)ositive, active, aggressive side 
 as presented to us in the picture of the Athletes detinite aim, and 
 determined, unflagging effort. I can only touch upon that side of 
 our duty now. It is a most imj^ jrtant side. We can only continue 
 in the Faith, and stand Arm and unmoved in its defence, Hrst by 
 realizing its truth and solenui significance to ourselves and to all men ; 
 and then secondly, by setting ourselves, with fixed resolve and com- 
 bined, concentrated effort, to live the truth and to propogate the truth 
 vieing with one anothei-, to be first in holiness eind in nearness to our 
 Lord, and foremost in bearing the glad tidings of salvation to perish- 
 ing men. That is the picture which the contests of the stadium 
 recall. Is it the picture, my brothers and sisters, of our lives ? Are 
 we not content with the lowest attainments in holiness 1 AVilling to 
 make almost any compromise with the world that we may live at ease 
 and escape the peril of the battle ? The effort and the t(»il of striving 
 together for the faith of the gospel ? Is not this the very secret of our 
 coldness and deadness, and want of success in the things of God. 
 This half-heartedness, this compromise with the world. Who are th* 
 people, for instance, here in Toronto, who throng the theatres ; who 
 bet and win and lose on the race course, who get up and lavish their 
 money in barbaric display or on the senseless panide and extravagance 
 of the ball-room and the party ; who perform in the silliness 
 of what is called Rotten Row ? They are not all Church-people, no 
 doubt, but two-thirds of them are. No wonder that others put us to 
 shame by the generosity of their giving to the cause of God ; that 
 we are falling behind those who have not htul half our advantages in 
 the noble strife for the Faith of the Gospel, as they understand it. 
 
 Now I want to press this matter upon you laymen, and especially 
 upon you who are here as the representative men of the Church in your 
 parish or mission. There is a good deal of complaining al)out the 
 clergy in many places : they are not good preachers, or they are not good 
 visitors, or they are not as conciliating as they might be. But what 
 about yourselves 1 Does your parish or missions present a picture in 
 anyway resembling that drawn by the Apostle's hand ? Are you as a 
 
12 
 
 congregation striving together for the Faith of the Gospel ? li(M >' » -!y<»!a.i., 
 taken pains to ascertain that Faith, to understand it with your minds, 
 to embrace it with your hearts, to live it in your lives? Do you 
 confer together about the interests of the Kingdom of God? 
 Do you combine and organize, and strive togetlier, each one doing his 
 best — not merely in giving, but in working to extend and to defend 
 the Kingdom ? Is that the picture, or do you just fold your hands, 
 and leave all to the Parson ; go to church, })erhaps, (mce on a Sunday ; 
 perhaps criticise the sermon ; jierhaps go to sleep. Never pray for tlie 
 clergyman; nevorread a lKK)k in explanations orillustrationof the Faith; 
 never si)eak to a neighbor about the interests or the claims of the Church, 
 well content to leave him alone, if he will leave yt)u alone — is that the 
 picture ? And then you wonder that the clergy don't attract large 
 congregation, that the Chureh does not succeed. The loftiest com- 
 mendation that Newman ever gave of his fellow-workers in the 
 Tractarian Movement was, that they were "brimful of schemes for the 
 Church's good." Is not that just what is lacking in most people's lives? 
 They are brimful of schemes for their own good — for the good of their 
 childi en — for the good of society — but for the Church of Christ 
 never a thought or a plan or care. Brethren, to be indifferent about 
 the truth, to be inactive in the cause of Christ, to leave things tc^mke 
 their own course, not to use the best thought and judgment and 
 energy and skill that we have, not to stand fast, not to be striving 
 together for the Faith of the Gospel, is to be a traitor to our Captain 
 and our King, and to prove ourselves unworthy of our privileges and 
 of Him. The kingdom of God was meant to be a kingdom of workers, 
 as it exists in most of our parishes it is a kingdom of drones. What 
 are you doing ? I ask you, one and all, that you can think of as a 
 striving together for the Faith of the Gospel, what are you doing to 
 extend the Truth, to defend the Faith to uphold the Kingdom ? What 
 would you think of an army whose generals and colonels and captains 
 were the only men that ever tried to learn their drill, that bore arms, or 
 tired a shot in the day-battle ! would you be surprised at their failure, 
 at theii utter defeat ? 
 
 Soldiers of Christ arise, 
 
 And put your, armour on, 
 Strong in the strength which God supplies 
 
 Through His Eternal Son. 
 
 >^