THE 
 
 ritisfi Empire League. 
 
 Offices at 
 
 BOTOLPH HOUSE, EASTCHEAP, E.G. 
 
 (C. FREEMAN MURRAY, Secretary). 
 
 ^«%. 
 
 epovt of 3t><^^ch 
 
 L'Y 
 
 fk RllpHT HON. JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P., 
 
 ON 
 
 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25th, 1896. 
 
 ^RlSf- 
 
 Printed by kind permtssiun of tbe Author. 
 
 4lt^ 
 
 mi 
 
|lte?;ibfnt : 
 
 HXS GRACE THE DXJKE OF DEVONSHIRE. K.a 
 
 Son. Ijxmslxxzx - 
 
 THE RIGHT HON SIR JOHN LUBBOCK. Bart., M.P. 
 
 Cl^airmuit oi €xecutil)C : 
 
 SIR ROBERT G W. HERBERT, G.C.B. 
 
 W. HERBERT DAW» F.S.I. 
 0» FREEMAN MURRAY. 
 
 H 
 
 J' 
 
»/. ^^3C^>^^* /^ 
 
MR. CHAMBERLAIN 
 
 ON 
 
 "A ZOLLVHREIN FOR THE EMPIRE;" 
 
 TiiK recent speech of The Iviglit Hon. J. Cliiimherlain, M.P., 
 to the Canada Chib, l)eini>' the leading ollicial pronouncement 
 on one of the principal subjects specified in the Constitution of 
 the liritish lOnipire League, the Executive Committee have 
 thought it desirable to reprint for the use of the members 
 an authentic report of this s})eech, witli Mr. ('hamberlain's 
 sanction. 
 
 They do not thereby commit the League to any present 
 opinion on the important proposition set out by Mr. Chamberlain 
 for general consideration : but as the members of the League 
 are specially interested, and may not improbably take part, 
 in the discussi(jn which it is desired to elicit, it ha.s appeared 
 opportune to supply the speech in a convenient form to the 
 League. . 
 
 SPEECH BY THE RIGHT HON. JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P. 
 
 Mli. CUAMiiKKLAlN. who on risin;^- to rt'spond to the toa^tof '*Tho 
 (lovenior-tiouerai (iho Earl of Aberdeen) and the Douiiuion of 
 Canada." was roctnvoil with prolouj^a^l cheers, salt! : — " Mr. President 
 and (ientlemen, — I feel lioiiourod in lifiiiji' a-<:-iociuto«l in this toast 
 with Dr. Montague, a meinber of the Ministry and of the PurHument 
 of Caniula, and I hav<^ nuich pleasure in meeting so many representa- 
 tives of that great Donunion. which, whethiir \\v have ro<jar<l to the 
 area of its tt^rritory. to its population, to its natural resources, or to 
 any other test by which wc ^laufie the ;rreatness of a j>cople. stands 
 to-day first amou^ the i/roup of kindretl natiuui' which tojrether with 
 
the United Kin}r<lom I'ormtlit' IJriiish Empire. (Chcor^.) I Imvcoii 
 two ocuJiHioiiH had the itk!U><ure of virtitin^'- Canada, and I liavu luwl 
 tho opiM)rtunity of niakin^r the aiKiuaintanco of many of her lejuliny 
 Htatesmcn. and notably of the late Sir John Maodonald. that most 
 Imperially- minded man (eheers). whose ^^'uidin^i' idea throujrhont 
 his lon<j: political life was to maintain intact the local independence 
 of Canmla in clo«; alliance with the mother country. (Cheers.) I 
 think that at times he had no easy task. (Hear, hear.) There were 
 prominent men on both sides of the Atlantic who at one tini(i 
 assume<l that the manifest destiny of Canada was to be absorbed into 
 the jcreat Republic on its southern frontier, (•' Xo, no" ; " Never.") 
 Thit was the opinion. (Hear, hear.) It is an ancient controversy, 
 and I do not think it necessary to refer to it to-ni}j'ht oxcei)t to mark the 
 contrast b ^tween tli • doubt, and hesitation of those days and the 
 determination now of every son of Canada to maintain his local 
 institutions, his stiparatt; idenaty. and at the same time to draw closer 
 the bonds which unite him to the ^-reat parent State. (" Hear, 
 hear," and cheers.) 
 
 CANADIAN LOYAIiTY. 
 
 The recent isolation of the United Kinydom, the dan-^crs which 
 seemed to threaten us. have evoked from all our colonies, and 
 especially from Canada, an outburst of loyalty and affection which 
 has reverberated throujjhout the world, which has had a <,''reat effect, 
 and which testifies to a sentiment that is <lceper than words can 
 express. (( 'hetns.) \Vo have been told by cynics that these expressions 
 of loyalty and affection are superfluous — that they are the ornaments 
 of after-dinner oratory ("No, no"), but that they would not bear 
 the tost and trial of serious conflict, that if a war should ever arise 
 the mother country would bu left to her fate (" Xo. no"), and that 
 the colonies would take care of themselves. That idea, at any rate, 
 must have been ilisjxjlled by what has recently happenetl. (Hear, 
 hear.) The shjwlow of war did darken the horizon, and to none of 
 her Majesty's subjects was that shadow more ominous than it was to 
 our fellow citizens in Canada; but there was no hesitation, althoujih. 
 if that hiul hapiHjned which would have been abhorrent to all of us, 
 the brunt in the first instance would have fallen on Canada. A 
 unanimous voice went up from the peo})le and Parliament of Canada 
 to say that this matter, although it did not directly affect their 
 interests, yet affected the honour of the British Empire, and they 
 made common cause with us. (Cheers.) They were jireparetl to 
 stand shoulder to shoulder and to bear their share in all the evils 
 that miyht come upon us. Their decision was emphasized in 
 
thp debate to which you. l^Ir. President, have referred, which took 
 place recently in the Dominion Parliament, and the moral of whicli 
 wan summe<l up in the conclusion of the elofjuent speech of Mr. 
 M'Xeill. the mover of a loyal and patriotic resolution, when he said, — 
 ** The British people are one people, aniraatwl by one spirit, and 
 •letermined to stand to;rether as one man in defence of their common 
 rijjfhts and in the maintenance of their common interests." (" Hear, 
 hear," and cheers.) " We desire peace before all, we rejfard war 
 with horror, but wo are prejmred to accept it with all its con- 
 sequences, come from what (juarter it may. if it be necessary to do 
 so in order to defend the honour and the inte},''rity of our own 
 Empire." (Cheers.) I call your attention to the last v ords of the 
 orator. He speaks of " our own Empire." and he struck the ri^ht 
 chord, for the Empire of (Jreat Britain i-> the common heritajre of all 
 her sons, and is not the appana;,'e of the United Kinjfdom alone. 
 (Cheers.) Xow. in the course of that debate many sj)eeches wen- 
 made all to the same etfect, and the resolution was unanimously 
 passed with acclamation. 
 
 IMPBKIAL FEDERATIOiN. 
 
 But a^-ain and a<rain allusion was made to the opiwrtunity, to tht 
 occasion, which every well-wisher to the unity of the Empire wa^ 
 bound to seize, and a hope was expressed that somethinjr mijrht be 
 done to brinjr us nearer to^^ether. Sir, we share that hope. ('' Hear, 
 hear," and cheers), and I ask you now, trentlemen. is this demonstra- 
 tion, this almost universal expression of loyalty from all our 
 Colonies, to pass away without a serious effort upon the part both ol 
 colonial and Imperial statesmen to transform these hiyh sentiments 
 into practical results .' (Cheers.) I have, at any rate, thou^'ht that 
 it was my duty the first time I had the opportunity of speakinjr at 
 least to call attention to the position of this ;rreat question, which 
 has been before us now fcr a «ood number of years, which has 
 appealed stronjfly to the sentiments of the people, but which has not 
 up to the present time resulted in anythin;r like a practical scheme. 
 In the year 1884 a lea^'ue was formed — the Imi)erial Federation 
 Leajfue — under the most favourable auspices. The late Mr. Forster 
 was its president, and it afterwards enjoyed the a.ssistance of a lon^r 
 series of distinjruished statesmen and prominent personaj^es ; but two 
 years a{fo it was dissolved without havinjr accomplished its object, 
 unless, indeed, its chief object was the education of public opinion to 
 the importance of the subject. Sir, I think that we may, at all 
 events, learn from its ex}>erience that the realization of our Lopes, if 
 they arc in the direction of a federation of the Empire — their final 
 
tt 
 
 rciili/ation — is a matior ot such vast ma;;nitu(k' and such uivat coui- 
 l)lication that it cannot be undertaken at tlie present time. But it 
 'l(»es not follow that on that account we should i;ive up our aspira- 
 tions. (Hear, hear.) It is only a proof that we must approach the 
 ^•oal in a diflFerent way. that we must not try to do everythiuy all at 
 once, that we must seek the line of least resistance. To create a new 
 u'overnment for tlie British Emi»in — -a new government with larj^'-e 
 l)(>wers of taxation and lejrislation over countries sei)arated by 
 thousands of miles of sea, in conditions as various aw those which 
 prevail in our several dependencies and colonies — that, indeed would 
 hi- a duty from which the bolde^^t statesman mitjht shrink appalled. 
 We may, however, approach this desirable (jonsnmmation l)y a process 
 »f gradual development. (Hear, hear.) We may bear in mind the 
 words of an ohl poet — that 
 
 " No vast desiyn was ever snatched in haste; 
 " 'Tis patience heaves it on." 
 ( Cheers.) 
 
 COMMON INTERESTS AND OMMGATIONS. 
 
 We may endeavour to establish connnon interests and common 
 ol)ligations. When we have done that it will be natural .that .»ome 
 sort of representative authority should j^jrow up to deal with the 
 interests and the oblij^'-ations we have created. What is the greatest 
 of our common oblii:ations .' It is Imperial defence. What is the 
 irreatest of our common interests .' It is Imperial trade. (Hear, 
 hear.) And those two are vei'y closely connected. It is very 
 difficult to see how you can ])retend to deal with the great question 
 of Imijerial defence without having first dealt with the question of 
 Imperial trade. Imperial defence is largely a matter of ways and 
 means, and ways and means are dependent upon the fiscal and 
 other commercial arrangements you may make; and, therefore, the 
 conclusion to which I arrive is this — that if the people of this 
 country and the people of the colonies mean what they have been 
 saying, and if they intend to approach this (juestion of Imperial 
 unity in a practical spirit, they must approach it on its gommerqial 
 4tle. ,, , ' ,,. ,.;.^! 
 
 THE EXAMPLE OK THE GEKMAN EMPIRE, 
 
 We have a great example before us in the creation of the German 
 Empire, How was that brought about .' You all recollect that, in 
 the first instance, it commencetl with the union of two of the States 
 which now form that great Empire in a commercial ZoUverein. 
 They attracted the other States gratlually — were joined by them for 
 commercial purposes, A council, a Reichsrath, was formed to deal 
 
with thoso commercial (lUestioiH. (irailually in their discussion"* 
 national objects an«l political interests were introtluceii. and so, from 
 startinjf as it did on a purely commercial basis an<l for commercial 
 interests, it dovelope<l until it became a Ijond of unity and the founda- 
 tion of the German Empire. We have another reason why we should 
 approach this subject from its commercial side, and that is that in 
 rejrard to this the colonies, to whose f eelinys we must pay the utmost 
 deference, who mu.st. in fact, in one sense at any rate, take the initiative 
 in any movement, have clearly ])ointed by their action to commercial 
 union as the point upon which, as they consider, the whole subject 
 is most ripe. Why. what happened at the }rreat conference at Ottawa 
 which was held in 1HI)4 .' The princijml resolution — princi]>al. at all 
 events, in rejrard to its importance — which was passed at that 
 conference, was in the followin<r terms : — •• That this conference 
 records its belief in the advisability of a Customs arranjrement 
 between Great Britain and her colonies, by which trade within the 
 Empire may be placed upon a more favourable footinof thau tlia<-. 
 which is carried on with foreij:n countries." (Cheers.) It is quite 
 true that that was the declaration of a {general principle, and that 
 no definite jilan was submitted to or mlopted by the conference, but 
 we have other means of information. We are acquainted with the 
 -speeches that were made there, and we know what was in the minds 
 of the dele;rates. I observod in The Thnea this morninjjr a tele^raixT 
 from Canada which tells us that I\Ir. M'Neill. the gentleman who 
 move<l the patriotic resolution to which I have already referred, has 
 move<l another resolution in the House of Commons of Canada, by 
 which he proposes to declare that it is desirable in the interests of 
 Great Britain and of the colonies that a moderate ad valorem duty, 
 independent of any existinjr duty, should be imposed both by the 
 colonies and by the mother countrj' upon all imports from foreijrn 
 countries. (Cheers.) That, therefore, is the sujifg'estion, for I will 
 call it no more, it is not a formal proposition, but it is the sug-,i?estiou 
 that has been made to us by our colonies for carryinjr out a system 
 of commercial union. At any rat? a proposition of that kind is 
 entitled to respectful consideration, and if we object to it. we ou^ht, 
 r think, to propose an alternative, or we oujjht — and this is the only 
 other thin*,' for us to do — t ) say at once that all that we have said, 
 Jill that we have done, all that we have thou<rht about Imperial unity 
 ha- been thrown away and that that idea must bj abandoned as an 
 empty dream. Now, bir, do not let us minimiz .1 the proposition we are 
 asked to consider. It would involve in the oi^e of the United Kinjrdom 
 a mo*t serious disturbance of our trade ; it would be a jrreat chanjfe 
 
in the principles which for many yeary pa»t have jruided our commer- 
 cial policy. It involves the imposition of a duty, it may be a small, 
 but it is a duty upon food and upon raw material. an<l whatever 
 may be the result of imposing such a duty as to which, if I had time. 
 I could discourse for many minutes — whatever may be the actual 
 result — the tendency is to increase the cost of livini? which would in- 
 crease the pressure upon the working-classes of this country (No, no 
 and hear, hear), and it would also have a tendency to increase the cost 
 of production, which would put us, of course, in a worse position 
 than now in competition with forei«i:n countries in neutral markets. 
 
 THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE PROPOSAL. 
 
 1 see no use in shutting my eyes to the consequences of the proposition 
 (cheers), which I desire to consider with an impartial mind. The first 
 thinfr is to establish the facts, and the facts are as I have stated. In 
 return, under this proposal we should ^'et a small, and a very small, 
 consideration in the shape of a preference of. it may be 2 per cent., it 
 might even be 5 percent., in our competition with forei<fn manufactures 
 in the colonial market. Now. what. then, is the propo-ial we are 
 asked to consider 1 It is a very startlinj^ proposal for a free-tra<le 
 country (hear, hear), and I say that in its present form it is a proposal 
 which it is impossible for us to adopt. (Cheers.) I do not say that 
 merely becaus*^ a proposal of this kind is contrary to free-trade 
 l)rinciples. because althoutrh I am myself a convinced free-trader in 
 the sense of believinjr that the the theory is undoubtedly the theory 
 on which the world would become most prosperous, yet I have not 
 such a pedantic admiration for it that, if sufficient advantag'e were 
 offered to me. I would not consider a deviation from the strict 
 <loctrine. (Hear, hear.) Mr. Cobden himself took this view, and 
 compromised his principles in makin^j the French treaty; and it 
 cannot be expected that we, his disciples, should be more authodox 
 than the apostle of free trade himself. (Hear, hear, and laujfhter). 
 But my point is that in the proposal and the su<rtirestion v-hich has 
 hitherto been made there is not sufficient qtiid pro quo, the advanti^e 
 offered is not enough to induce this country to take the certain loss 
 and the possible risk which would be involved in revising altogether 
 its present commercial policy. Having regard to the amount of the 
 colonial duties which are at the present time levied upon British 
 produce, it is evident that a fixed addition such as is suggeste<l 
 would be a much smaller preference in the case of goods going to 
 the colonies than it would be in the case of goods coming from the 
 colonies to this country. In the case of this country the preference 
 is given on the present cost price of the goods, but in the colonies 
 
the j)ret'erencu is only added to the cost of the ;»'oods plus the heavy 
 duties now imi)0scd. The percenta<,'e tliereforc would be much more 
 in favour of the colonies than it would be in favour of the United 
 Kinj^dom. (Hear, hear.) But the second point, which is much more 
 important, is that our foreijrn trade is so jjiyantic in proportion to the 
 foreign trade of the colonies that the burden of an arran^jement of 
 this kind would fall with much jTreater weij^ht on the United 
 Kinj^dom than upon our fellow-subjt^cts in the coloni&s. I therefore 
 think we may very fairly ask our fellow-subjects in the colonies to 
 better their offer if. as I believe, they desire to proceed upon those 
 lines, and if those lines do really offer the best direction in which 
 we can procxd. • . , ,.. 
 
 LORD KIPON's despatch. ' 
 
 The arjjuments I have used, and a jiood number of oI.hers with 
 which I should not think of wearying- you. have been very ably stated in 
 an imjjortant despatch which was addressed by my predecessor, Lord 
 Rijwn. in 18*.);"), to the Governors of all the colonies, and that despatch 
 has been {^fenerally assumed to be an absolute negative to the projwsals 
 of the colonies. That is a mistake. That despatch is conclusive, 
 in my opinion, as to the particular proposal which has up to the 
 present time been suj-tjested for our consideration. l)ut it does not 
 bar the door to other proposals, which, bein^»- more favourable, mi^'ht 
 receive a more favourable consideration. There is one passaj^'-e in 
 Lord Ripon's despatch, most important in my eyes, which somehow 
 or other seems to have escaped jicneral attention. It is a paraj^raph 
 to this effect : — " The resolution (that is. the resolution of the 
 Ottawa Conference) does not advocate the establishment of a 
 Customs union eomprisinji- the whole Empire, whereljy all the I'xist- 
 inji' barriers to free commercial intercourse between the various 
 meml)ers would be removed, and the agfrre^iiite Customs revenue 
 eciuitably apportioned amony- the ditt'erent communities. Such an 
 arrangement " says Lord Ripon. " would be free in principle from 
 objection, and, if it were jiracticable. would certainly prove effective 
 in cementing the unity of the Empire and jiromoting its progress 
 and stability." Now that is another suggestion. That is a sugges- 
 ticn of an alternative to the proposition which I have btrn consider- 
 ing ; and I would like to be allowed, in order to nuike the course of 
 my argument perfectly clear, to summarize what I have said to you 
 U{)on this point. 
 
 i-'ouu ruopoHiTioNb. 
 
 I have laid down four iiro|M»sitions which I think cannot be con- 
 troverted. The first is that there is n universal desire among all the 
 
10 
 
 mcraberH of the Erapiro for a closer union between the several 
 branches, and that, in their opinion as in ours, this is desirable — nay. 
 it is essential for the existence of the Empire as such. My second 
 proposition is that experience has taujrht us that this closer union 
 can be most hopefully approached in the first insttance from its com- 
 mercial side. My third proposition is that the suyjrestions which 
 have hitherto been made to us, althouj^^h we know them to have been 
 made in ^rood part, are, when considered from the point of view of 
 British interests, not sufficiently favourable to be considered by this 
 )untry. My fourth jjroposition is that a true Zollverein for the 
 Empire, that a free trade established throughout the Empire, 
 although it would involve the imposition of duties against foreign 
 countries, and would be in that respect a derogation from the high 
 principles of free trjide and from the practice of the Unittnl Kingdom 
 up to the present time, would still be a proi)er subject for discussion 
 and might probably lead to a satisfactory arrangement if the colonies 
 on their part were willing to consider it. ("Hear, hear," and 
 cheers.) It ha.s been assumed, in Lord Ripon's despatch and in many 
 other documents, that the colonies must necessarily refuse to consider 
 a proposition of this kind because it would interfere with the 
 necessities of their revenue, that they are obliged to rely upon 
 indirect taxation for the funds by which their Administration is 
 carried on, and that they could not enter on such an agreement as 
 this without providing way and means by methods which, at present 
 at any rate, are altogether unpopular in many of our colonies. I am 
 not convinced of the truth of that statement, and I want especially 
 to jx)int out that the advantages of such a proiKjsal are so great 
 to the colonies, as they would undoubtedly lead to the earliest 
 jHjssible development of their great natural resources, would bring- 
 to them population, would open to them the enormous market of the 
 United Kingdom for their proilucts, their food, their timber, their 
 sugar — the advantages, I say, are so important that it appears to me 
 that the colonies themselves would be bound to give to any sugges- 
 tion, of this kind at all events, a careful reconsideration. 
 
 AN INDIHPENSABLE CONDITION. 
 
 My second {H)int is that we are dealing with an entirely exceptional 
 state of things, and that we cannot, even if we wished, imitate 
 exactly the German Zollverein. We are not conterminous countries; 
 we are countries, as I have said, s(*parat<Ml by thousands of miles, in 
 some cases, and the circumstances of our different countries vary so 
 considerably that it is evident that in any arrangement as to general 
 free trade within the Em|)ire excei)tions must be made in the case of 
 
n 
 
 articlos that arc chiefly taxed for revenue purposes. For instance, 
 we cannot admit free trade in spirits or in tobacco, and to any 
 •rentleman who has any experience other articles will su^-<>-est them- 
 selves, which in one part of the Empire or another are the subject of 
 strictly revenue duties, and nii<,'ht. by common a^a-oement, be ex- 
 cluded from any such arranyfement. But the principle which I 
 claim must be accepted if we are to make any, even the slipfhtest, 
 jjrojifress is that within the different parts of the Empire protection 
 must disappear, and that the duties must be revenue duties, and not 
 ])rotective duties in the sense of protectinj^- the products of one part 
 of the Empire a;'ainst those of another part. It seems to m(^ that if 
 that principle were adopted there would be reason for calling" a 
 council of the Empire, callinji- .epresentativv's from the different 
 States forminji' the Em])ire ; and althoujih the subject would be one 
 of enormous difficulty and the jireatest com])lication, still, with the 
 ••ood will that exists and the ultimate j^oal in view. I cannot but 
 think that something like a satisfactory and a workable arranjjfement 
 miyht be arrived at. (Cheers.) And although in such a case the 
 ])rinciples of free trade would lose somethin^r in their appli- 
 cation to the dealiujis between ourselves and foreign countries, 
 advocates of free trade must remember how much they would yain 
 by its extension to all the States which form the British Empire, 
 States which are after all. whatever may be said of their present 
 position, more likely to develop and incrc^ase in prosperity and popu- 
 lation and wealth and power and commerce than any of the foreit^n 
 States with which we have relations. 
 
 OUR ULTIMATK OlUKCrf. 
 
 Mr. President, I feel that I owe you some apoloj^y for dealing'- at 
 such lenjfth with a subject which mi^ht be thought to be too 
 serious for after-dinner oratory, but there is no doubt that we all 
 feel that it is a subject of enormous imix)rtance. and I desire very 
 much to call attention to it. I speak on this occasion for myself 
 only. I want, not to lay down a course of policy which must be 
 followed, but I want to provoke discussion — to provoke di8cus.sion in 
 this country and to provoke discussion, above all, in the colonies ; 
 and if the details of such a subject as this are prosaic, at all events 
 the ultimate aim that we have in view appeals to our hij,^h(;8t senti- 
 ments of patriotism. To orjranize an (nnpire — one may almost say to 
 create an empire — trreater and more potent for peace and the civiliza- 
 tion of the world than any that history has over knf>\vn (cheers)— 
 that is a dream if you like, but a dream of which no man need be 
 ashamwi. (Loud cheers.) We appreciate and we cordially respond 
 
12 
 
 to the notes, the stirriiij^ notos. of loyalty and affection that have 
 been evoked from our colonies when th(* threat mother country has 
 appeared to be in dan<,''er. \\'e look forward with hope and with 
 confidence to the development of those countries which are populated 
 by our children and by our kinsmen, but these sentiments alone will 
 never make an empire xinless they are confirmed by bonds of material 
 interest, and we can only found Imperial unity \ipon a common weal. 
 (Cheers.) And so, if you will j)ermit me, I will conclude in the 
 words of a (■anadian ])oet who. addressing!' the st:itesmen of the 
 Dominion, said : — 
 
 " Unite the Emjiire — make it stand compact. 
 '• Shoulder to shoulder let its members feel 
 " The touch of British brotherhood ; and act 
 •• As one ^^reat nation — stron;a and true as steel." 
 (Loud cheers.) 
 
 ..I 
 
 » 
 
 I'rlntod by A, Coi'i-uhkv & Co., Ltd., 0, KaBtchoap, London, K.O. 
 
TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP. 
 
 Miniraum Subscription of Membership, One Guinea per annum. 
 
 The Friends of the L«a<fue are reminded of the jrreat expense 
 necessiirily inourre<i in the production and in the distribution under 
 the existinjr postal system, oif its correspondence and literature. 
 
 SubscriptionH is excess of the above towards meetin^r this ex- 
 penditure will be gladly roceived,iind acknowledged by the Secretary. 
 
 STAN 61NG ORDER 
 
 To 
 
 Messrs. _ ...- ^ Co. 
 
 Pay to the Order of the Briti:ih Empire League now, 
 and hereafter^ on the let January in each year until further 
 notice the sum oJ\. 
 
 BlONATUKE 
 
 Adduess 
 
 Date 
 
 £ ■■ •• 
 
 7'At# Order to te returned to the Secretary. Jiritigh Empire League, 
 , Butolph ffaiue, Easicheajt, B.C.