GUIDE TO POLICE MAG-ISTRATES AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. ► A PRACTICAL GUIDE I^OLICE MAGISTRATES JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. WITH AN ALPHABETICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW AND AN ANALYTICAL INDEX BY JAMES CRANKSHAW, B.C.L., MONTREAL A, hoc,,/, „.iu/ lin-ishui ll(trrl>if,T : Anllu,,- (>/".!/< Ayiuotatal IMition „r f/ic Criminal Codr of Ciiiimla, ISUJ.'' MONTHEAL: WIHTKFORI) \- Tiri;()IN<7r. LAW 1500KSELJ,EItS, PlULISMEIiS, LMl>OHTEH.S AND MLNDKHS 2a AM) 25 ST. .LvMES STREET. 180.5 EnTKKKI> ACCORTIINO TO ACT OK PAIU.I A M KNT OK C A \ ADA, IN Tiiio YKAH WJn, iiY WHITEFOHD & TIIK()1{KI'. ix thi: OFFICE OF THE MINI8TKR OF AGRICUI/I'lHK, Ar OlIAWA. TO THE HONORABLE SIR CHaRLES HIBBERT TUPPER, K.C.M.G., Q.C. MINISTER OF JUSTICE OF THE DOMINION OF CANADA THIS WORK MOST RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED. PHKFACE. Encouraged by tlie favor with which his aiinotatt'd edition of the CanfiNAL Code op Canada lias been received by the profession throngliout the Dominion, and prompted, also, by the urgent solicitation of his publishers, the Author ventures to make another effort in the field of legal literature. The present work is inteiided for the guidance of Justices of the Peace, and to be of practical use, — as a book of ready reference, — to Police Magistrates, Magistrates' Clerks, and legal practitioners. It is based, mainly, though not solely, upon the Criminal Code; and, with the view of bringing the work up to date, the latest statutory changes and amendments, including those made by the Dominion Parliament in 1894, as well as the most recent judicial decisions of importance have been incorporated and carefully noted in their proper places. After a short introduction on the origin of the office of a Justice of the Peace and the growth of the institution to its present state of importance, the work is divided into four divisions. The first treats of the modes of and the formalities attending the appointment of Justices of the Peace and Police Magistrates and of their respective powers, duties and respon- sibilities ; the SECOND treats of the parties to the commission of crimes, and of the extent of the Criminal Law as to time, persons, and place ; the third deals with the prosecution of criminal offenders, the jurisdiction of the criminal courts and of Magistrates and Justices of the Peace, the general powers VIII I'UACTIl'AI. (HIDE T<> MAll I SI'KATES. of HUimuary arrest ol" t'riiniiml ofteiiders, tliu modes of prose- cuting iiidictalde ott'eiices, the procedure l)etbre and at the Itrcliniinary enquiry into eliarges triahle by indictment. \]iv procedure in Hiinimary trials of indictable oftences, 8[»ee(ly trials, and triah- of juvenile nffendern, and the procedure in connection with tlie summary trial and convicttion of persons charged with non-indictable ottenees, including the subsecjuent proceedings by way of appeal, reserved case, certiorari, and habeas rorjms ; while the fouktii division consists of an alpha- betical synopsis of the criminal law. Besides all the necessary forms, appropriately distributed according to the several subjects to which thcj' relate, a tiible of indictable offences is placed at the end of the chapter upon procedure in preliminary enquiries, and at the end of the chapter on sumniary convictions a table is given of non-indict- able offences. J. C. Montreal, Slat January, 1895. TAHLK OF CONTKNTS. — •♦• — • Preface vii AMln'cviatioiis ^vji Table of C'uHes xx.' INTKODUCTION. Origin of the Office of Justice of the Peace. Karly Knulisli Courts I ('oiiHcrviildrH of the IVace IH Institution (if .lust icfs (if t lie I'eaee Ill (Creation of their .Suimiiary Jurisdiction IV FIEST DIVISrON. Appointment of Justices of the Peace and Police Magistrates: and their Powers, Duties and Responsibilities. CHAl'TEK I. JusTiiKs (IK THio I'kaci;. I'AGB How Constitnterl i ' Their Aiipointinent 4 Proi)ert.v (^ualilleation d Oatli of Q\iiilitlcation 7 Oaths (if Allegiance and of OfHce Id CHAPTER II. Appointment of Police Macistkates. In Ontario y In Quebec j^ In Xova Scot ia, Manitoba, and Keevvatin I7 In British Columbia and X. W. Territories 1« CHAPTER III. The Powers, Duties and Resi'onsihii.ities of Juhtuks and Police Maiustkates. Nature and extent of their Powers 18 Disijualifying interest, bias or partiality 2.5 Ouster of Summary Jurisdiction 32 Power to Maintain Order ;^(j Liability for IllcKal Acts [[ [ ;ji) Formalities of Actions against Justices .50 Mandiunus 51 Rule in the Nature of a Mandamus 5<5 X PRACTICAL, GUIDE TO MAGTSTKATES. SECOND DIVISION. Parties to Crimes : Extent of the Criminal Law, as to Time, Persons and Place : Special Sestrictiona. CHAPTER IV. PAKTIES to CiMMlSS. I'AGK Principal Ollenders .58 AccessoriL's after the Fact (J3 CHAPTER V. Extent of the Chiminai. Law as to Time, Persons and Place. Liinitations of Time under the Criminal Code (i.T Othur Limitations (f? Computation of T>imiti'd Time (38 Limitations in Summary I^rosecutions 70 Persons to whom the Criminal Jjaw extends 72 Extent of the Criminal Law of Canada as to Place 73 CHAPTER VL Special Restrictions. Prosecutions requiring consent of Gov.-Gen 77 Prosecutions recjuiring consent of Atty.Gen 77-78 Prosecutions reciuiring consent of Min. of Mar. and Fish 78-79 THIED DIVISION. Prosecution of Criminal Offenders. CHAPTER VIL Indictable and Non-Inpic table Offences ; Jurisdiction ; Summary Arrest. Jurisdiction of Criminal Courts 80 Exclusive Jurisdiction of Superior Criminal Courts 81 Concurrent .Jurisdiction of General or Quarter Sessions 82 Where Offenders may be Tried 83 Magisterial Jurisdiction 83 Exorcising Powers of Two Justices 84 Local .Jurisdiction in Special Cases 85 Summary Arrest 90 Justification of Summary Arrest 95 Statutory power of Arrest 98 Justification of Force used in Arrests 98 Duty of Persons Arresting 99 Preventing Escape 99-100 TABLE OP CONTENTS. Xl CHAI'TKH VIII. Proskcution ok I.\imTAHi,E Offenck.s. r.xoK Modes of Prosecution 1"<' ("oiiipi'lliiiK AppciiiMiR'i' befr)iv Justices lOl OIlViiccs Committed out of Magistrate's Jurisdiction W.i Liiving Information 1'" Ileariiitr Information and Issuing Summons or Warrant 105 Warrant in Cases of OlFeiKes Committed on tlie Iligli-Seas 101) Contentsof Sunnnons, Service 107 I'xeeution of Wairants 10!) 11 1 Endorsed Warrants ll'> Proceedings in Canada on Warrants issued Elsewliere 110 Search Warrants 117- LSI Forms under Part XLIV of tlie Code 135 Additional Forms 1-1 ICxamples of the manner of stating Ofrences 143.1811 CIIAPTKP IX. {Putt XLW vf the Cuili:) Pi{()(i:mi£K O.N Ai'1'KABANc;k op Accused.— Pudi.imi.nahv ExyuiHY. When Prellmiiiarv En(|iiiry to 1)0 llehl IIKI Property found on prisonei' lUO VJ2 I rregularity in Procuring Appearance Iit2 I 'rocuring .\ttendance of Witnesses 103 Evidence Under Commission KKi Conunitment of Witness Refusing to he E.xainined 19S Disciftion of .liistice at Preliminary Knciuiry 1!K) Accused Persons Under Ki to be Kept Separate 2tKl Hall on Remand 201 Evidence for the Prosecution 202 Interest or Crime no Har to a Witness' Competency 204 Accused a Comi)etent Witness 204 Oi'dering Witnesses Out of Coui't 2(M Evidence on Oath or Atlirmat Ion 205 Modes of Adoilnistering the Oath 207 Evidence of Mute • 20!) Evidence of Foreign Witness 20!) Examination in Cliief 200 Cross-i'Ixaminatlon 210 Re-Examlnation 211 Evidence of Young Child 211 Evidence to be Read to the Accused 212 Caut ion to the Accused , 212 I*;vlden('e of Confession or Admission 213 I'lvldence foi' the Defence 210 Expediency of Callinu Witnesses for Defence 217 I )lscharge of the Accused 220 Committal for Trial 221 Recognizances to Prosecute or Give Evidence 222 Xll PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. i-a(;e Transmission of Documents 22H null- as to Hail 221 Bail After Committal 22() Warrant of Di'liverance 22S Warrant to Arrest a Hailed Person About to Abscond 228 Delivery of Accused to I'rison 22!) Forms Under Part XLV of the Code 229-241 Additional Forms 245 24!) l.isl of Indictable Offences 2:)1 2(((> CHAPTER X. (Parf IJV of the Cod,:) Si'EKDY Trials ok I n dicta hi. k Ofkknces. Application. -Meanings of cxpretisions "Judge," etc 267 Judge to be a Court of Record 2ttS Otlences Triable Cnder this Part 208 Duty of Sherirt' After Committal of Accused 2(t8 Arraignment 2(i!) Costs 20!) Compensation to Bona Fide Purchaser of Stolen Property 271 Restitution of Stolen Property 271 I'ersons Joiiu iy Accused 273 Klection Afier Refusal to be Tried by Judge 273 Flection After Committal Under Part LV or LVI 274 Tiial of Accused 274 Powers of .Judge 275 Reserving Questions of Law 278 Appeal "When Question Not Reserved 270 Admission to Bail 27!) Adjournment.— Powers of ^Vmendment 270 Recognizances to Prosecute or Give Evidence 270 Attendance of Witnesses 280 Forms Under Part LIV of the Code 281-284 Additional Forms 285 CHAPTER XI. {I'tirt LV of thr Code.) Summary Tuiai, ok Indk tahi.u; Okkencks. Dennitions 287 Otlences to be Dealt With under this Part 288 When Magistrate sliall have Absolute .lurisdictitin 289 Summary Trial in certain cases in Ontario 290 Summary Trial in Certain Other Cases 290 I'roceedlngs on Arraignment of Accused 2tK) I'uiiishmenis under this Part 291 Proceedings for Otlences in liespect to I'roperty Worth Over Ten Dollars, and I'unishment on Plea of Uuilty in Such Cases 292 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Xll PAGE INIii^ist rati' May Decide Not to Proceed Sumiuiirily 2!>2 Klcitioii (if Tiiiil liy Jury to be stated hn V/arniiit of Coniinittal 2!W F.ill Defence Allowed 20:1 Proceedings lo l)e in Open Conrt. 2!):{ Procuiinjj; Attendimee of Witnesses 2!):! Service of Summons 2!M Dismissal of t'liame.- Ktl'ect of Conviction 204 Certidcate of Disnussal a liar to Fuitlier Proceedings 294 I'roeeediHKs not to l)e Void for Defect in Forn) 2!)") Hrsnli of Hearing; to i>e Filed in t'ourt of Sessions 21(i> Evidence of Conviction or Dismissal 2tM) llestitul ion of Propert y 2!M> Remand for Further Investigation 2!l() Non-appearance of Accused Under Kecogni/ance 2(M> Aiijilication nf Fines 2i)7 Certain Pro\ , ins not Api)licat)le to this Part 2i)S Forms under Part LY. of the Code 21)8 299 CHAPTER XII. (Pitrt LVI. of the Code.) TKr.M. Ol' .IrVKNIIiK Ol'l-'KXnKKS FOR IndICTABLK Oir'KNtKS. Definitions 800 P\inisliment for Stealing :t01 Procuring Ap|iearance of Accused ;{01 Ueniand of Accused a02 Accused to Elect How he Shall he Tried ;«)i! Wlien Accused Shall not be Tried Summarily 'M'S Summons to Witness. — Hinding Over Witnesses :{()H Wai'rant Against, Witness 'M'.i Si'rvice of Summons ',M Discharge of Accused :>0l Form of Conviction ;{()! Further Proceedings Dai'red 1504 Conviction and Kecogni/ance to l)e Filed 'MiH Quarterly Helurns :!()") Hi'stitution of Projjerty 'Mii Proceedings When Penalty Imposed on Accused is not Paid .105 Costs.- Apiilicat ion of Fines :j(X) Costs to be Certified by Justices ;107 Ai)plication of tliis Part :10H No Imprisonment in Reformatory in Oniario Under this Part liOH Otiier Proceedings Against .Invenile Otl'enders Not Affected ;t08 Forms Under Part UVI. of the Code 308-309 XlV PBACTICAIi GCIDE TO MAGISTRATES. CHAI'TKIf XIII. {Part L\ III. of the Coih:) SUMMAKY CoNVIcriONS. l'A(iK Intei'prctiit ion.— Application ;il(l Time Within W'liich Proceedinf^s Shall hp Coninicnced 311 .Inrisdiction 311 Iloarin^ Mofoi-e Justices 312 Hacking U'ai rants 314 Irfoiniations and Uoniphiints ; . . . 315 Ci'i'tain Oh.jcct ions not to N'itiatc FrceoediriKs 310 SuninioMs or U'aiiant to Witness 311) Hfarinn to lie in Open Conrt 31)) Counsil for Part ies 310 Evidence .320-324 NonapjH'arnnce of Accused oi- of Prosecutor 32.5 32M Proceedinj^s When Moth Parties Appear 32H ArraiKmiit'iit. — Adjournment 32!) Adjudication.— Form of Conviction Ml-IWi I)if<l)osal (»f Penalties on Conviction of .Joint Otleiulers IWH First Conviction in Certain Cases 338 Certiticate of Dismissal .'ttO Disohedieiice to Order of .fust ice :i31) Assa\ilts.— Disnussal of Complaint for Assault 'Mi) Kelcase from Further ProceediuKN 340 Costs 342 Recovery of Costs 342-343 Fees 343 Provisions Respecting Convictions 345 Order as to Collection of Costs 347 Kndorsement of Warrant of Distress 'Ml Distress Not lo Issue in Cei'tain Cases 'M8 Remand of Defendant When Distress is Ordered - 348 Cumulative Punishments 348 Recoyn izances 340 Appeal 3.TO-;i55 Conviction Not to he Quashed for Defects of Form 355 Certiorari 3.50 Conviction to be Transnutted to Appeal Court 350 Conviction not to be Held Invalid for In-egularity 3.50 .■^(iO Protection of .Justice Whose Conviction is Quashed 3(H) Condition of Hearing Motion to Quash 301 Imperial Act Superseded ;^61 .Judicial Xotic! of Proclamation 301 Refusal to Quash. — No procedendo necessary on 362 Costs 302 Abandomneiit of Ap])eal ;^03 Statement of Case by .Justices for R«;vie\v 363-307 Ilaimas Corpus 308-370 TABLE OF CONTENTS. V Tciulcr and I'.iyim-iit '^71 Hflnins lU'spcctiiiK Ct'iivictioiis H72 I'i'.bliciitioii, cK-., of Ht'tunis 1173 I'fOsocutiiiiiH for Penalties Under Art. Wi 374 Hcinedies Saved -174 Dt'ffctive HetnrnH '174 ( 'crtain Dcfeits not to Vitiat^^ Proceedings 374 Pi-csci'viiifi Order in Court 375 l{esist;ince to I'lxecntion of I'' .^<ss 375 {■'ornis I'nder I'art LVIII. of tlie Code 375 3i)8 Additional Forms 3iW-402 Tal)le of N'onIndictal)le OHences I'ncivr the Code 4()3-40S CIIAPTKR XIV. {Piirf LIX o/ thf Codr.) KiaO(iNIZANlKS. Kendcr of Accused by Surety 409 IJail After Wender .' 400 Uischarfie of Kecoj^nizauce 409 Render in Court 410 Sureties not Discliarged liy Arraijinnient or Conviction 4U> Hin'lit of Surety to Render 410 Entry of Pines, etc., on Record anil Recovery Thereof 410-411 Ollieer to Prepare Lists of Persons I'nder Recognizances Mnkinfi' Default 412 Proceedings on Forfeited Recognizance 412-415 Apiiroiiriation of Moneys Collected by Slierilf 415 Special Provisions as to Quebec 415-417 Form under Part LIX of the Code 118 CHAPTER XV. {I'arf /.AT of thv Code.) SiTRETIES KOR KkEI'IXC TIIK PeacE. Persons Convicted may be Fined and Bound Over to Keep the Peace. . 419 Recognizaiu'cs to Keep the Peace may be Recpiired of Per,*)ns Charged With Ofl'ences or U))on Complaint of a Person Threatened 419-421 Proceedings wlien a person does not find .sureties 42 I'orms under Part LXV of the Code 422-425 FOURTH DIVISION. Al.PH AHETK'AL SyXOI'SIS OK THE CRIMINAL Law CE CANADA 420 fi72 XVI PRAOTICAI, UUIIlE TO MAGISTRATES. APPKNDIX. TiiK KxriiADiTioN Act. PAGE ExtnuUtion frr.ni C"iiiiii<la. 07H Kxtrudit'on from Foroitin State 07,5 Kxtnulition of iTinuiiiilh iH'twce 1 Canada and I'. S (W! List of oCieuces extraditable but veeu Canada and U. S (VIT Forms (i77, (ufi TiiK Kii(irnvK OrrKXiiKns Act. Ap|)lication of Act, and crimes allected by it (i78, Cuit Manner of return of fugitive • (W(l Evidence 081 Amkn'ojiknt to Tin: Codk. An Act to further amend the Criminal ("ode, I8!)2 ()82 YOUTHFUI- OlIKNDKRS. An Act respecting the Arrest, Trial ami Imprisonment of youthful of- fenders (W) An Act respecting juvenile olFenders in New Brunswick ()87 CrE:NEEAL INDEX G8'J ABHREVIAFIONS AND REFKRENCKS. Ad. & K. ((**• A. & E.) Adolpliiis & i;ilih" Hcpdrts. A Hull Allen's New Hruiiswick Heports. Am. Hi']) Amci'iciiii Reports. .\iiii. Hl'H Aiiiiiial l{e}.?isiei-. Anon AnonyniDUN. Areh. Cr. PI. & Ev Arclibold's ('riniinal I'leadin^i- and Kvidoiice. 15. & Aid Banu'wall it Alderson. B. & Ad Marnewall & Adolplms. H. & B. {or Brod. & B.) Broderip & BhiKlnini. B. & C. (or B. & Cr.) Barnewall Hi Cre.sswell. Barn Barnai'diston. Hell CO BelTs Crown Cases. B. &S Best & Sniitli. B. .t P. {or Bos. & 1».) Bosan(|uet it Buller. Bln^ Bingham. Bisli. \e\v Cr. L. Com Bishop's \e\v Criminal Law Commentaries. Hi. Com Blackstone's Commentaries. Broom's I.e^c. Max Broom's Lefj;al Maxims. Broom's Com L Broom's (,'ommon Law Commentaries. Bull. X. P Buller's Nisi I'rins. Bur. DiK Burliridfje's Dijiest Criminal l,aw. Burr Burrow's Reports. (^ald Caldeeolt's I'ases. Camp Camphell's Reports. Can. L. J Canada Law .Journal. ("an. L. T. (oc C. L. T.) Canadian Law Tinu's. Can. S. C Canada Supreme Court Reports. ("arr Carrington's Criminal Law. (' & K Carriufj;tou & Kirwan's Reports. C. & M. {or Car. & M.) Carrington & Marsliman's Reports. C. & P Carrington & Payne's Reports. Cliit Clntty's Criminal Law. Cliit. Rt'p Chitty's Reports. Cartli Cnrtliew's Rei)orts. CI. & F Clark * l''inuelly. Co. Litt Coke upon Jjittleton. Comb Comberbach. C S. Consolidated Statutes of Canada. C. S. L. C " " Lower Canada. C. S. U. C " " Upper " Cranch Crancli's U. S. Supreme (^ourt Reports. B XVIll AHiiKEVIATIONS AND 11EPEKENCE8. ("f. li. Man Criminal Law IVIiiK<ixiiu>. ("roirii). &, M Cromptoii it Mccsoh'm HcportH. ('. M. (fe H Ciomplon, Mcfsoii i\: Hiiscou'm Ht'iHirtH. ■C. C. R Crown Cuscm IJe.scrvecl. Cowp Cowper'.s Hi'port.s. Cox U. C Cox'.s Ci iinintil Cases. Dalt Diilton's Justice of the Peace. 1). & M Diivison it Meriviil's Hcports. Dears Dearsley's Crown Ciiscs. Dears. & H Dearsley & McM'm Crown Cases. Den Denison's Crown Cases. Dick Dickinson's Quarter Sessions Practice. Dor. Q. B Dorion's Queen's Dendi Hep. (Quchec.) DouK Douglas' Reports. Dowl DowlinK's Ueports. Dowl. & L. {or D. & L.) Dowlinj^ & Lownde's Reports. D. & R DowliuK & Ryland's RejMjrts. East East's Re))()rts. East P. C East's Pleas of the Crown. E. & B Ellis & Blackhurn's Reports. E. H. & E Ellis, Blackl)urn& Ellis. E. & E Ellis & Ellis. Esp Espinasse. F'ort Eortescue. F. & F Foster & Finlason. Fost Foster's Crown Ca.ses. Greenl. Ev Greenleaf on Evidence. Greenw. & M. Mag. G Greenwood & Martin's Maptisterial Guide. Hale, P. C Hale's Pleas of the Crown. Han Hannay's \ew Brunswick Reports, Hawk. P. C Hawkins' Pleas of tlie Crown. H. L. C House of Lords Cases. How. St. Tr Howell's State Trials. H. & N Hurlstone & Xornian. Inst Institutes (Coke's). ^ Ir. C. L. R Irisli Common Law Reports. Ir. L. T Irisli Law Times. Jur The Jurist J. P Justice of the Peace. Keb Keble's Reports. Kel Kelyng. L. J. (M. C.) Law Journal (Magistrate's Cases). L. J. (P. C.) ... Law .Tournal (Privy Council). L. J. (Q. B.) Law Journal (Queen's Bench). AHUREVIATIONS ANI) REFKRENCES. XIX I,. IS. App. C'li l.iiw H('|)orlM (Api)ciil fuses, ||o\ist- of Lords mid I'rivy ('oiiiicih. L. H., C. C. U I'iiw lU'ports (Crown ('uses Rt'siTvcd). L. H., F. & I) I"iw lifiioils (I'lolmtc & Divorce). L. H.. Prol) I^iiiw Reports (rioliiite). L. R., Q. H Law Reports (Queen'- Heiich). I,. M. & I' Lowndes, Maxwell & Polloek's Reports. L. T Law 'I'iines. L. N LckhI .News (Montreal). L. * C LcIkIi i^ ("ave's ("rown Ca.ses. Lev Levinz. Lew liewins ('rown Cast's. Ld. Hayni Lord Raymond. L. C. .1 Lower Canada .Iiirist. L. ('. L. .1 Lower Canada Law .lonni.d. L. C. R I jO wer Canada Report s. Leacli Leach's Crown Cases. M. & G. (or M. & Gr.) MannhiK & Gran^ier's Repoits. Mall. L. R Manitoba liaw Reports. Marsh Marshnll's Reports. M. & Sel Manle & Selwyn. M. & W Meoson & W'el.shy, Mod Modern Reports. Moo Moody's Rejiorts. M. & M Moody & Malkins Reports. Mon. L. 1) Monthly Law Digest (Montreal). M. L. R. (Q. U.) Montreal Law Reports (t^neen's Bench). M. L. R. (S. & C. C.) Montreal Law Reports (Snperior and Circuit Courts). Moo. & R Moody & Robinson's Reports. M. & P Moore & Payne's Reports. M. & S. {07- Moo. & S.) Moore & Scott's Reports. N. B. R New Brunswick Reports. N. S. R Nova Scotia Reports. Odg. Lib. & SI Odgers on Libel & Slander. Oke's MaR. Syn Oke's Magisterial Synopsis. Ont.^App. Rep. {or Ont. A. R.). .Ontario Appeal Reports. Ont. B. (or O. R.) Ontario Reports. Palcy I'aley on Summary Convictions. P. E. I. Rep Prince Edward Island Reports. P. & D Perry & Davidson. Plow, (or Plowd.) Plowden. P- & B Pugsley & Burbridge's Reports (N. B.). P"Ks Pugsley's Report.s (N. B.). Q. L. R. . .T Quebec Law Reports. Que. Otr. Rep. (Q. B.) Quebec Official Reports (Queen's Bench.) XX AHHREVIATKlNS AND KKKERENCEH. a R. &H R "Till! Hi'ports" (Clmncery Division). in. &i)i{ " " (Ciiu'fii"« Uciicii Appi'iiiH). .") |{. & 10 it " " (Ciufcn's lifiicli DiviNJon.) It. S. I' •. I{('vi»i'(l Sditiili's ill' Caiiadii. R. S. U.C " " Uiili-h ("olnmliiu. R. S. .\. U " " Nt!\v Miuiiswick. R. S. N. S " " NoviiScollu. R. S. O " " Ontario. R. S. Q " " Quel)ec. Rev. r,('g Ri'vnc Lejjiilc (Qnclicc). Hoscoc Cr. Ev Roscoe's Ci-iininiil K\ idcnct'. liuss. & CiM. (id- R. &(;.) Husscll &(;cl(U'rt'H Reports (X. S.). l{. & It. {or RuKH & Ry.) Rnssi-ll & Ityan. RuHs. Cr Russell on Crinii's. R. & M. (m- Ry. & M.) Ryan & Moody. Sallv Salkuld'H Reports. Saund Saunders' Reports. Show Shower's Reports. Sid Siderdn's Reports. Sir T. Rayni Sir 1'. Itaynmnd's Rejiorts. Sni. L. t.' Smith's Leading Cases. Stark. f<]v Starkie on Evidence. Stark Starkie's Reports. Steph. Com Stephen's Commentaries. Slepli. DIk- Cr. Pro Stephen's Digest of Criminal Proeedurc. Steph. (ien. V. C. L Stephen's (ieneral X'it'w of Criminal Law. Steph. Hist. C. L Stephen's History of the CJriniinal Law. Str StraiiKe's Reports. Stev. Dig Steven's Digest of New Hrnnswiek Reports. St. Tr State Trials. T. R Term Reports (I)nrnford & East). Tayl. Ev Taylor on Evidence. Taunt 'I'aunton's Reports, Tyrw. (or Tyr.). . . Tyrwhitt. U. C, C. P Upper Canada, Common I'leas. U. C, Q. H Upper Canada, Queen's Bench. Ventr Ventrls. * Ves Vesey's Reports. W. Bl William Blnckstone's Reports. W. N Weekly Notes. W. R Weekly Reporter. Whart. C. L Wharton's Criminal Law. TAHLK i)V (^ASPX CITKD BY NA.MIv I'.UiK Aiiron, (Louis) and others R v. , 128 AI)l)Ott, U. V 5!H(» Alinihiiiiis, H. V 5;W Accrro, V. I'etroni 210 •\(krov<l, H. V 'M'i Ailimis, 1{. V :>!»:(, (««» Artiuiison, U. V 54, n(l, ai(!, 5;«I AicUleM, U. V 546 Aiken, R. v :H21) Ali'xiindi'r, R. v a^tt Alliiii, R. V (M, :C)0 Allen and others, R. v iVtH Allen, R. v, , . M2, 45, 74, :«7, H5H, 47(1, (144 Allen V. Worthy 72 Allen V. Wright !>« Allison, He 3(W, H71 Allison, R. V 475, 470 All Saints, Southanipton, R. v.. a) Alwartl, R. V (HKl Anderson, R. v % . . 74 Andrews, R. v (KW Angel, S. V 4!)K .4/(0(1 2<i, fi59 Apothecaries Co., v. Jones tilH Archer, R. v 5;«, 5(59 Armstrong, R. v 75 Armstrong v. McCafl'rev 37 Arnold, R. v " 21 Arrowsmith, R. v 41 Arscott V. Lillie 47 Aspinall, R. v 5()7 Aston, R. V .57, 72 Aston V. Blagrave 38 Atc^^eson v. Mallow 501 Athay, R. V 42 Atkinson, R. v 00, 522, (««) Atty.-Gen. v. Bradlaugh .32:1 Gen. {Hong Kong), v. Kwok-a-Sing 72 (Jen. (N. S. Wales), Mnk- ens and Wife, v 526 Gen. (N. S. Wales), Mc- Lend, V 76, HS, 478 (ien. V. Radlott' 323 Gen. V. Sheffield Gas Con- sumer's Co (529 Gen. V. Sillem 323 At well, R. V 047 .Vit wood, V. .lolilfe 44 .Vttwood, R. V 439 Andl.-v, 1{. V 044 .Austin. K. V 68, 588 Ayard v. ( 'avendish 21, :W2 Azzopardi, R. v 76 Hadger, R. v 43, 220 llaileyA Collier, Ri- 371 Haines, R. v 308 Baker. R. v 4.55. 0.50 Ballv Castle, Magistrate of, R. V 35 Bannen, R. v 60 Barliere, iV/""'''^ 32 Barclfiy v. Bearson . 013 Uavkt-y, Ex jKirte ,597 Barker, B. v 45, 337 Barnard, R. v 535 Barnes, H. v 532 Barrelt, lir 689 Barr tt. R. v 09 Barratt, v. Burden 615 Barron, R. v 40, 43 Barronet's Ca.se .570 B.'Vrronet, R. v 49(5 Bartlett, R. v 621 Barton v. Brieknell 47 Baselie v. Matthews 47 Basten v. Carew 44 Bate, R. V 215 Bates, R. V 203 Bauld, R. V 581 Baylis, R. v 42 Beard, R. v .55 Beekwitli v. Philby 90 Beeching. Kr parte 370 Beetner, R. v 20 Bell V. Oakley 121 Berry, R. v 577 Bellamj', R. v . (i!) Bennett, R. v 4, 336, 586, .599 Berkshire, ,1. J., R. v 5!)9 Best, R. V .502 Berwick on Tweed v. Murray. . . .524 Bertles, R. v 53)5 Bessell v. Wilson 191, 329 xxii TAIII.E OK ('AHF8. I'AllK licit luMil, S, V .">H2 Hctii'iwoiih, H. V .">;( Miitiiv. /iV .. ;wi. :ii:» HilliiiKH, H. V ; 21 IliiiKstnck, 11. V ■'».■! Kiiiiii'V, K. V :ri7 ItiicliV. I'ctkins IH llcinif v. .MiiiHliiill :«l ifir'dii, |{. V .'i7 Mil I If, 1{. V :wt( lijiiriiscM, U. V 7;< niiuk, u. V .")i»i lllair. 1{. V olW Hliiki-. H. V nOn llliss V. Iliill (121) Ilolinu'lnokf, U. v :«) Molion, U. V ST)?, :H70 Moiid V. Plumb 47;< IlDi.th, It. V 4;io lioli V. Ackiovd 47 Moiillhci'. I{. V :tt7 How (1. 11, 1{. V (MW Ilo\v(ll..|'s Cwe :itll Hiiw ver, U. V 452 lidNNViT V. IVrcy Supper Club. . 588 M.pwl, 1{. V 213 lli.ylf, it. V 10 l{()/:mi|ui'l V. Wiiodfonl 20 Itiiulfonl, H. V (120 Miailv V. .McArgle 514 Miady, It. V 5!^4 Mi'iiliiun V. .lojce 340 Mr.wstcr, 1?. V (12 HriuKldc, It V 421 Hrissoii V. LiifDiitiiiiie ."ilH hristdl. .1. .1., It. V 57 Hilttaiii V. Kliinaird 44 Hr.iadluirsI, It. v 21 Mrod.ilp, It. V 54 Urouk." and others, II. v 41 Mrookcs. H. V 27ti |{r(;()ks, H. V (IS, ;T'24 nniniiic. It. V 22(i Hross V. lluber 21, Xi Hroiijilitoii, 1{. V ."j31 Mrowii, H. V 55, 104, HW Hrown V. liinden 1147 HrnwiK'll, It. V (121 liuilgc V. Parsons 513 Mull, It. V 524 Hiilliick, R. V 27(1 HiiMii, I{. V 50-1, :m\ Murdi'tt, R. V 87, 277 Uni'ncss, R. V .502 Mur^on, It. v .-,3(i Huniaby. R. v 133 Murridjii", R. v (14 Riirrows Case 570 Mush, R. V 4 Hutterworth, R. v 277 H\itterv, R. V H7 Bvkerdike, R. v 277 T'A(iK ( 'a<lby, /•.'.'■ /iiirtr 5'|(l ("allanhan v. .'-inc. , (7r 511 Caiid.ridticsh, .1. ,1., R, v 21 Caniliriduc RtM order, R. V 32 Cainpliell, R. V 5K7 Caniplii'll V. .MeDonuld 31 ("anipliii, R. v 015 Canadian rrisonern Cane Oiuiii Re WaiHon) 71 Cai'den, II. V 271 Carr. It. v 74 CaiMin, It, V 277 Carler, It. v 21, 5!+!, (I4H Caiiier v. lini'ian<t 44 Carlwriuhl v. (Jreen (101 Cams WiisoMM Case 3(10 ('asl)oll. It. V (W, (IP Case, It. V 403. (H5 Casey. It. v 185 Cashiohnrv, R. v 350 Cass, It. V.' 213 Cassidv. R. V .-)24 Calell V. Ireson 323 ("aton. It. V 315, ..■>5 Cave V. .Mountain 44 Cent. Cr. Ct., .1..!., R. v 272 Chandler. R. v 108 • 'lian<ller v. Home 205 Chauev \ . I'avne 45, 33S Chai.niiin. It.V 27, 210 Cliapple, R. V 04 Charles. R. v 502 Chassen. It. v Ill Cheesenian. It. V 518 Chellenhain Coniinrs., It. v.... • 27, 32, 357 Cheney, C. v 471 Chester. .Mcrei'is & Ironinon- iU'Vs Co. V. Ilowker 25 Child, It. V 70 Christopher, R. v 2(M, tiOl ('Itv of .Stewart v. Cunniiifihani. (i;t5 Cla'rUe V. Mradiautfh 2(Ki Clark, it. V 218, .'.iw ('le<! V. Oshoni 57 (^lissold V. .Maehell 30 t'ohheltv. Hudson 205 Cohen v. M(U'gan lOti ( 'ole oujih, R. V 51S Coleman. It. v (MiO Collins, It. V 4(i7 Collyer. R. v :W Ctjionial Hank of .\ustralftsia, v. Willan 358 Complon. It.V 270 Conner, It. v 510, ."»0!) Connolly, It. v 450, m> Connor, R. v 535 ("onnor v. Kent 581 Cooke, R. V 645 Cook. It. V 1»3, 204 C loper, R. V fil Coote, R. V 215 TAIII.B OK CASES. XXIII Paor (•(irl)cl V. ]\i{\nh nlKI Coinwill V. K t«M Corriw 'll V. SaiidtTs 'Ml Ciiritdi'ilidii III' lhililiiiK<l<>ii & .\l.)ir .Wl ('(Pipoiuiidii (pf St. I''ri.n (iIh <le .S.ili's, St. Ainuiir v nHTi lostar 1. llftlii'rinKl"". T^. '-SM, 'M'i Coiioii. u. V :«' (•oiiJM.n. n.\ (IIH Ciiiiiitv >V DitiKiviiii, H. V K7 CiiiirtiMMi V. 'PdiiNf 21(1 C'owiip ■. Allii'iloii 'M CdWiiid V. Hiuldcli'y 4r)7 CdwicH \ . Diiiiliiif JKl ('d\, |{. V 524, (H7 Cd/ui s. K. V Ill, 12 Ciiimi), li. V i:i2, W.'i CniMsliiiw, I!. V 570 ('n'P|)-,\. Diinli'ii 31(1 CrUlliiiKl, U. V :« Cijsi., I{. v." mi CroniM , |{. V 455 Cross, H. V (K«l Crd-slcy, |{. V ( 'i-owdcr v. Tlnklff. . ( 'rduliui'si, H. V ('rnziiT V. Ciindy . Crnsc, It. V Crvcr, It. V Ciidily, It. V I'idlcM V. 'riliidili'. . . , ('iiiiiiiii^liaiii. H. V . . Ciirtrciu I'M, li. V . . . . Ciiri'.iii, li. V ('iiii'iui V. 'ri'flciivon . DnUKcIt V. ("attcrus. Dale, It. V Daltdii, h'.fjKirtf. . . . Dalldii V. Colt , llalv. It. V Dam, It. V lla\ idsoii, It. V Davi.'s, It V Davis, It. V Davis V. Itusscll D lyniaii, II. v Dawsdti, It. V I)cl!t'i'ciii;i't'. It. V Dclilcv. I!. V Do Mill Ids. It. V Dcnl.i^dislijiv, .I..f., li. v.. DL'iiiiiaii, I!. V . . . . Dt'iiiiis, V. Lane Dcriiiv V Tliwaitiis Di'iiy,' It. V Deny and others, R. v Di'Hiidycis V. Hazin D('|iai'dd, H. V Dospatii', Kr piirfc Df Wilt Wire Cloth Co. v .lcr>cy Win- Cutli Co.. 40, 4!l:i ilO, :W2, I12!l 211) 121 .-)7(l H7 m\ 72 177 ii:i .-)Sl Xevv 472 i:i2 'MS 208 071 5()i» ;t4 :« 04S Oli 37 545 507 210 7.< :!.T:t 105 420 421 :i.57 594 7:i 071 501 I»A(!K Dillon V. O'lJrli'ii llo Dlim-'s Case. !«l. :i7ii Dime's V. (Jmiid .liuict. Can Co 25. :t2 Dixon. If. V .-.Id Dixi.n. V. WidU IIMl ■.)l(liin, It. V lilt ilodds. It. V Ill I Dodson. H. V ;i;i Ddhirlv, U. V 421 llolii riy V. .Muiivn :tl7 Diiiini'i'lv. /.'<• .-)hO Dns-rll.' It. V 451, .-)20 Ddwcll V. MrnniuKtlidd 00 Dowry, It. V 5;{4 iliw ninK V. t'apid Kl DiMKi'. It. V lUK Drisidll. h'.i' jKi rfr IlO, 5S7 l)iur\. It. V :i:«t Dndil'v, H. V 75 Dii-aii, /•;./• /iiirfc 001 Duiidas, It. V .");I4 Dinii'iiii V. 'I'liwaiti's iiiiH Diinldp. /■.'.!■ /Kirtt' 5il.'i DiiMii, It. V 421. 51.-., Ids Dniiiii'll, II. V 5114 Diiniiin)^'. It. v :i24 Dkvyi'i'. It. V 177 Kau'lfldii It. V 4(«l Kfid.'s. It. V 507 Iviinoiids V. IJowu 20H I'^ichcnl.rr^;. Com. v 11:14 lO^I-iiilon, /;'.•■ /iiirfr IKW I'llilcr. r. S. V 5S2 Kldcishaw, It. V 044 Kldiidir,.. H. V 2i:{ Kli, H. V ao, 22S Kllins, 11. V 277 Kiiiot, u. V my KlriiiKton, H. V 205 ICIsci. V. ,S nith 120 KIw.dl, a. V :ioo hmmoiis V. C'ty of Lowi.ston. . . (Wl lOMti-i'hman's Case 207 Ksdaili-. It. V .->0S Ksop. It. V 570 Ksscr, It. V H7 Ks.srx, .1. .1., H. V ;40, :152 Kvans, It. V 277 Kwan. It. V 41 KxftiM' (.Mayor of) V. Heaman.. :W0 Kf iKiitv Marhcre. !12 HarktT 507 Heoching :t70 — — Cadhy 540 Dal I (in 511(1 Dfspatie 071 DrLscoll :iO, 587 DuKaii 001 Dunlop 503 E^rginton :KW I'Vntiman 40, I;) XXIV TAHLE OF CASES. PAliK Ex /itirti Fonlkfs 341) — Klcmiii'j: 303 Fitzpat rick ... 0)13 (Irk'Vi's :i!t - Hopwooil 327, 32'J, 357 Jackliii ; 3(18 .loliii.soii 332 I.e^'ori' (101 . I.ewis 37 Lu^z 313 {'.iveeii mil - Martin 22 Farke oSl) — - Ransley 337 - Hi'id. . ■ 5ti HiL't',.Ioiu>s lOS Robert Tiionms 35 Simkiii (lit Sniitli HIS Tiin-ion 371 Wallace 31 Whalen («I2 White (i(H) Willianison 4 Woodhouse 3S(i Falkiiigham, R. v 427 Faiienf, R. v 20 Farrant, H. v 27 Farre's Case 401 Farrow, R. v 432 Fearman, R. v 20 FY'ist, R. V 31(i Fonnell, R. v 400 Feiitiniaii, Kv parte 40, 43 Field V. Jones 71 Fdewood, R. v 10 Fitz|)atrii-k, A'/> pnrfi; H03 F'inklesteiii. R. v 548 Flaniiagan v. Hisliop of Wear- iiiouth (571 Flattery. 1{. v MS F'lemin)?, E.r parte 593 Flint. R. V 534 F'liuton, R. V 071 Fontaine. R. v 477 ForVies, R. v 4«2, .540 F'oulki'.s, Ex parte 340 F\)x, R. V 40 Francis. R. v .'i2((, 051, 062 F'ranks, R. v 311 Frii.zer v. McKeiizie 9 Freeman, R. v 01.5 Freeman v. Reed 71 French, R. v 89, :}30, .587, 588 Fretw II, R. v 5(57 Friel v. Ferguson .52 F iller-i V. Foteh 44 F'lilhvood's Case 428 Furnival, R. v 4!K) Gaisford, R. v 28, 30 Oallaut V. Young 31 (iardner, R. v (>(i3 (Jarreis v. Alexander 547 (Jaseoi^ifie's Case 491 (iiilley. R. V .502 tiauvm V. Moore 30 (iavin, R. V 215 (ieaeh, R. v .546 (Jee, 1{. V 3:'() (ieerini;. R. v 32() Ceswood. lie 3(58 (iihlx n's Case 492 (ii'lxins V, I'epper 4.50 (iihson V. Lawson .581 (iiles, R. V .510, .533 (iilham. R. v 207, 214 (iillis, R. V 214 (iillyani, R. v 337 (iirdwood. R. v 87 Cloneestershire, .T. .1., R. v .'522 Coddard, R. v 210 Coodnniii, R. v 275,4.52 (Jou-h, R. V 332 (lonld V. .Tones 347 (Jonid, R. V .543 (iraliam V. McArlhur 47 (Iran 'lis R. v 58() (irant. R. v 4.52 Gray, R. v 4.51, 319 (Jraham v. Cookson 45, 3157 (ire});orv, R. v 01, 400 (Jrey, \\. v .5(59, ()02 (irieves, £",<• parte 29 (iritlin, R. v 519, 569 Gritliths, R. v 191 (irimwade, R. v (563 (Jroom bridge, R. v 495, ()44 (it. Yarmouth, R. v 20 Gudridf^e, R. v 20 (Juthrie, R. v 4(54 Hadtield, R. v 020 Haigh V. Shedield Town Council 472 Hall, R. V 214, 327, •Xii\ Hallett V. AVilniott 44 Hallidav, R. v 5(i2 Hamilton. R. v 317, 6&5 Hamilton v. Bone 623 Hancock v. Somes 72, 294, 342 Hands, R. v m.) Hann& I'rice, R. v 40 Hanson. R. v 35(5 Hants, .T. .1., R. v .55 Hanwav v. Boulthee 93 Hardy f{. v 210, (520 Hardy v. Ryle .52, 71 Hargreaves "v. Diddanis 3:5 Harley, R. v .547, 5(50 Harmaii, R. v 3.58 Harnier. R. v 220, 4.53 Harper, R. v 613 H iriier v. Marcks 51.3 HarriuKton v. Fry 347 Harris, R. v .' 451, 590 TABLE OF CASES. XXV PA(iK IliU'Khnmii, H. V :i-l lliirt, H. V im llailli'V, H. V :m ll;irv.y. H. v 477, WH) 11 irvi'V V. Faniic 477 II.ilcli'v. Taylor 52 lliitton's Case. . 22 lliiwlcy, U. V 4;W II, ly lock V. Sparks 47 1 lav wood, H. V 624 Hazel, K. V 51H llazlctoii U. V 5:« llcani, K. V 21:1 llcarh, K. V 5!)7 llcllV'rinan, Pt v ;W0 llclici- V. IJi'iiliursl 20 llciniiin'. U. \' 43 Ilciniiiilifi, H. V (i(i5 llciiiiiiiiigs, H. \ 051 1 Iciiilfr.son, R. V fiHo ll.'iikiMs, H. V 42!) Ilcmiali, R. V 432, 435 llcn-fonl, J. J., R. V 2() Hit. fortlsh, .1. J., R. V 52 llfi riiiKloii, R. V 341, 342, 351) Hcrtfor.isli,.!. .]., R. v 2t) 1 l('s<'ot I 's Case o'M llcvnian, v. R ,5()5 llU'kliii. R. V 58() llkks, R. V .55 llijJKiiis, R. V 460 Hill V. ("oombe 210 Hill V. Thorncroft 71 Hill. I!. V 277, 545, &18 lliiululin'e's Ca.se 400 lliiilev R V 88 lloaiv V. Silverlock 608 1 lo(i;;e, R. V 24, 58;^, 505 Hodge V. R 5Ki Hodge V. S 514 Hodgiiis, R. V 10 Hodgson, R. V 045 HoKtr V. Ward JXi HoRg, R. V 038 llolhorii, R. V 20 Holland, R. V .503, 505 Holland V. Foster 40 Hollingherry, R. v 276 Hollis, R. V 4;^l_ 432 llolloway V. R 465 Holniaii," R. V 30 Ho nie.s. R. v 463, 645 Hood, R. V 114 Hopkins, R. V .'. 430 Hopley, R. V 518, .560 Hop^vood, Rv parti' ...327, .320, 3.57 Horn 'I'ooke, R. v .547 Horsen\an, R. v 505 HosiNtson, R. V . 25 H.iwarth, R. v 93, 019 H well, R. V o;^ Howell v. Armour SS, 121 Hoye v. Rush 114 PA(iE 34, .571 20, 210 Hudson, V. Maerae Hughes, R. V Hull. R. V Hunt, R. V Hunter's License, lie Hunter, R. v Huuingdon (Corporation of) v. Moir Huntingdon, R. v Huntley, R. v Hunt.sworth, R. v Huston, V. Corheil Hutton V. Fowke 32 Imperial (Jas Light & Coke Co. V. Rroadbent 029 Ion, R. V .548 Isaacs, R. v 432 68 277 585 .534 584 337 5m 371 40 .Jaeklin, E.r parte 368 .lackson, R. v 40, 534, («rt .laeohs, R. v 470 .lacoml) V. Dodgson 71 .lames, R. v .:«, 193 ■V<(1 .lamiesou, H. v 614 Jarvis, R. v (U, 203 .leffreys, R. v 22 .Ieirries& Bryant, R. v 60 .Jenkins, R. v 210 .Jennison, R. v 533 Jepsoii, R. V 065 .Jessop, R. V 535 .TolniHon, E.v pnrfe .3.52 Johnson, R. v.. 104, 327, 497, .53.3. t«i7 John.son v. Colam .21. ;«4 Jones, R. v 4i)0, 5;« .Tones v. Grace 48 .Toyce, R. v .58?! .Jordan, R. v 4<X) Judge V. Bennett .581 .Jukes, R. V 571 Justices of Berkshire, R. v.. 509 Bristol, R. V. . .-)/ Cambridge, R. \ 21 Cent. Cr. Ct., R V. . 272 Denbighsh, R. \ 3.5:1 Essex R. V. 30 352 Gloucestersh., H . V. ;}22 Hants, R. v 55 Hereford, R. v. 20 Herefordsh.. R. V. . . 52 Hcrtfordsli., R. V. . 26 • Lancashire, R. V . . 41 Llanfillo, R. v.. 30 MertlnrTydvill, R.v 518 Middlesex, R. v :«:< Salop, R. V :i.59 Shropshire, R. \ 52 Stallbrdsh, R. v 40 SuHblk, R. V... .. 2(t Surrey, R. v . . . 20 West Riding (York- sLire), R. v. :«2 XXVI TABLE OF CASES. P Kaylor, R. v Ki'ir V. IjeeiTiiiii Kellv H. V Ki'iillall V. Wilkinson Kl'Mt, 1^ V Kerr, \i. v 52, Kcyn, H. v Kllhiiiiistcr, R. V Kill^^ H v (i2, 441, ri«8, 589, Kin- V. 1' Kiniicrsley, R. v Kinni'r.slcy v. Orpo Kinvoy, R. v Ki|)pH, R. V Kirby, R. V Kitclien v. Shaw Kite & Lane's Case KiisDM, R. V Kleui]), R. V Knidit cSc Rodev R. v Kniglit V. llalliwell Kdliri, R. V Alii'} 428 502 51) 47 ;u« (Mil 78 70 (U7 471 505 101 m) 525 •a 152 :« 402 72 l-al)ric, R. v 042 Lai'oursieie, R. v 30 hancashive, .I.J.. R. V 41 Lancaster v. (i raves lO Lanjitord. R. v 30, 45(i Landlord & ot liers, R. v 485 Laiinley. R. v 38 Laiij^tMcad, R, v 047 LauKwil li, V. Dawson 20 Lara, R. v 534 IjatlesH V. Holmes 71 Lawrence v. Hill KMi Lear, R . v (Mil Lecleiv V. Copeland 40 Lee. R. V 5";;, 5:14 Leete v. Ilarte 93, «i Lejjere, A,'.c /itirtc 001 LejjK V. I 'ardoe 33 LejiKct. R. V 519 Leonai'd AVatson & others, Nf . . 308 Lester V. (iarland 71 Leveciiuc, R. v 671 Levitt, R. V 571 Lewis V. Kernier 514 Lewis, E.r piirtr 57 Lewis V. Lew (K)7 Lewis, R. v.." 73,490, 507 Liwht, R. V 402 Linl'nrd v. Fit/roy 220 Lindsav v. Leigh 44, ;W7 Little, R. V. ... :ia5 I-lantillo. .F.J., R. V 30 Lloyd, R. V 0(i5 Lindsay v. Rook 540 Local ()ption Act, tie 584 Locost, R. V 492 Lolly. R. V 477 London iCHi/ of), R. v 273 liopez, R. V 74, 75 Lord Vane's Case 421 Paok Lorl V. Mutton 421 Love, R. V 208 Lovett, R. V 310 Lul'kin, Coin, v 514 Lntz, Ex lutrte 313 Lyons, R. v 590 McAthcv, R. V 047 McCadeitv, R. v 213 -MeCann, R. v 407 .McCarthy, R. v 45, XM McC;iuley R. v 587 M<I)i)Maj.;h. R- v .s7 McDonald, l{. y :«, 58(i McDonald v. Sfackey 53 McCilverv v. Gait. . .' .22, 53 McKecn. A'.c imrtv fMIl McKenzie, R. y 08 :\IcLcan, R. v 594 Mcl,eo(l. Atty. Cell. (N. S. Wales). V 70, S;!. 178 McMahon, R. v 210, 017 McNicholl. R. v 323, 589 AIcNafililen's Case 575 Mal)c<', R. V 320 Macarlv, R. v 507 ^Macanlev, R. v 050 Mackerel, R. v 024 Mac^raih. R. v 000 .Maden v. Calaiiagh 200 Maiiuille v. I'oitras 013 Mainwarinji, R. V 09, 475 .Makeiis & Wife, v. Alt. Cell. N. S. Wales 520 Mallinson, R. v 420 Mankleton, R. v 4;iO Mauley, R. v 00 Mann v. Devers 44 Mannin^j;, R. v 451 Margate I'icr Co. v. Ilannen 10 Marois V. Holdnc 49 Mai'iiott y. Shaw 310 Marshall, R. v 540 Martin. Kr jjarte 22 Martin, R. v.. . .480, 512, 502, 580, 045 Mason, S. v 70 Mason v. Barker 10, 337 Mason y. Rihby 108 Massey v. .lohiisJii 45, 52 Mathews. R. y 310 Matthews, R. V 022, 001 Mayers. R. v 045 Mayhcw v. Lo( ke 38 Mayor of Ivxef er v. Ileanian .... 330 Mayor of Hereford's Ciuse 25 Mead v. Young .... 545 :\Ieakiii, R. v 530, 570 Mee V. Reid 208 Mellor. R. V ;10S Mcllor V. Denham 323 .Mcrriman v. Clii|)peiihani Hun- dred 052 TABLR OF CASES. xxvn Pagk Mftc-ilf, AV (KI4 .Mcrtliy 'lydvil, .I..I., H. v niM >Ii'nuifr, /I'c I)7(i M.'vci>. 1{. V (i2i) .\li('ha.-l, U. V 5C.7 MidilU'scx. .1..!., H V ;i.'):{ Middlesex, (Sheritrof), H. v.... :m MidlMiii. U. V 4."), ;t:i7 MMdi-Diie, K. V 20,s .Miles. 1{. V 2i)5, -XV.) Millaid. I{ V .")4S Milledjie, U. v iS .Miller, l{. v 4-J.U Miller, S. V .ni Mills, I!. V .");(.-) .Mi liter Hart, K. v Mti Mitihelj. 1{. V 88, m< . Miteliell v. Defrie.s niS Mileliell V. Foster 72 .Miin-iil Sle iiLsliip Co., V. Mcdre- -■(.r r,oi .Moiidelet, l{. V 42!t .MDiMiiciutli, I!. V 52 .Moore, I!, v 8J), 5S((. 05() .Moruaii, H. V 207 .Mor,i;aii v. Hr.v(l!.ces 524 .Moriraii V. Ilii;;lies 10 .Moiiev, i{. V um .Mount lord, 1{. v 507 .Morris, I{. v 205, (i:fO .Most, a, V 542 .Mnlcaliev V. U 505 -Mullikin, S. v 582 Miillins v. Collin.s 441 .Mnrlis. |{. V 524 Miirphv V. .Maiiiiiiifj 514 .Mnrpli.v. I{. V .524, 504 .Miisseii. 1{. V 'Xi .Myeock, H. V 420 .Myei's, (". V 4i)H Myer.s, H. v 28 Xalal, {I.DrtUiislinpof) Ih... i'M Navlor, U. V ' Ti\-^ -Neill V. .Me.Millan 52 ' Newhoiild V. C'ol'iiian 20, 47 Neu man v. Jon .s 441, 588 .Newton Ferrers, v 20 -Newton, I{. V 40. .5:{, 475 Nieliolls, H. V 505 .Vieholls V. DowdiiiK 20!) Niiiin, 1!. V ;{;i5 Niiuiiely, H. V :{4, ;j7o Olirien, I{. v ;i4 O'Donnell, H. v. . . . !{){ Ollord, U. V '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. 575 t)'(!rady. I{. v ' 9(} <>':i er,'H. v 42!) ^'I'VT. H. V 277, 4({4 Oniielnind v. Harker 207 Osliorn V (!oujj;ii g;j| Oshorne V. Veiteli .' . . . 4.55 ]'AUK Owen, H. V 405 Owens, H. V 024 Oxford, 1«. V 575 I^iddle, R. V l'aliniali-;j:ay, K. v I'aley V. liircii I'alnier v. Hndson, \\. \ Palmer. U. v 548, I'arke, /■'.r/mrtr I'arkes, H. v Parker, v. (ireen Parker. P. v (W, 450, Parkin, H. v Parkvn v. Staples Pariildl, l{. V I'arrart, li. v Peat, H. V Peekliani, P. v Peerless, /.V 22, I'ellew V. Inliahilants of Woii- ford 71, Peltier, ){. v Peinl)letoii, P. v Penn v. .Mexander Perluv, H. V Perry, U. v 1 Vt ers V. Cowie Petrie, P. V I^liariiiaeetitieal Soc. v. Arinson. V. Delve... v. Piper. . Philips, li. V 00, Pliiliniore, H, v I'hipo.', U. V Pierce, P. v I'ierson, P. v , I^ifjeoti V. .Vlainvillc P()<-oek, P. V Povnton, P. V Price, P. V I'rice V. Me.sseiijier Prince, P. v. . . .4;10, .5a2, 571, 580, l^riee V. Saiiio Purdv, P, V Pyni,'R. V flfin 200 :« 00 501 58!) 545 ;j2:i 015 8t> 5:4 421 214 051 (!!) ■.m :i52 542 025 5!M> ;«:4 428 071 278 040 (UO 04t) (i44 57 cm 27;i 471 OW ':w 051) 457 121 (MiO 211 ;15H 5ii3 Queen's Case. Qnigley, P. v 211, 215 ... 108 Rudelirte, P. V 5:42 Palelide v. Partholoinew 71 Padford, P. v 547 Patlles. P. V :W7 PauK, P- V 5:14 Piiinsav & Foote, P. v 470 Pand, i{. V 28 Randall, P. v flUO Rankin, S. v OHO Ransford, R. v 4(!fl Ransley, /■'■v/Kir/r IW Pawlinjis V. Tell 450 Ray, K. v 475 XXVIU TABLE OF CASES. I' .204, .;i6K, Rend v. Hunter Heed, I{. V ]{ediiiaii, H. V Heed v. Nutt Hees V. Diivies Heid, n.v Hevel, H. V Jir Allison . Bailey & Collier... Barrett ■ Bibby 331, Donnelly Geswood Hunter's License Leonard, Wat.son & others. Local Option Hct Lord Bisliop of Natal. . . . Me, calf - — -Meunier Peerless 22, • Robert Hunter's License. . . . Sjjain • Taylor Watson (Canadian Prison- er's Case) Smith ( M'Uliam) Rice, li. V Rice, .Tones, Ex parte Richards, R. v 54, (io, Richardson, R. v Riley, R. v 463, Risliton, R. V 2(5 Histeen, R. v Roberts, R. v 270, 4(i7, 5()7, Ri)l)-rt, Thomas, E,e parte Robins, R. v 4:W, Robinson, R. v Roddy, R. v Rodgers, R. v Roebuck, R. v Rojiers v. Hanard Rogers, R. v Rosinskv, R. v Russell, 'R. V 450, Russell V. R Sainsbury, R. v 23, Salop, ,L J., R. V £aii(tinuin v. Breach. . ..104, 315, Sansonie, R. V iianta Clara V. M. & L. Co. v. Hayes Satchwell, R. v Sattler, R. v Saunders, R. v 62, 226, Saunderson, R. v Schmidt, R. v wScolield, R. V Scott's Case Scott, R. V Shellard, R. v Sellwood V. Mount 45, Serva, R. v 32(i (Mil (Mil) 342 33 573 38 371 371 .iWI 343 .")S!» :«)H ."i,S5 3(i8 5H4 437 (i04 ()7(i 334 586 635 317 371 327 471 108 213 587 645 32 ,599 002 55 650 660 323 546 535 106 ■Mi 4.55 629 sm 40 3sH) 055 212 301 452 75 4()2 600 649 466 .531 37 .505 .3:17 206 P Sharp, n. V 76, Sliarpe, R. v Sharpc's Case Shaw, H. V Shaw V. Morley Shetlield B. Co., R. v Sherwood, H. v Shore V. Wilson Shropshire, .IJ., R. v Shurmer, R. v .Simkiri, K.r parte Sinimonds, 11. v Sinniions, R. v 23, 28, Sini)).ion v. Wells Simpson, R. v 327, Siaverton v. Ashburton Slavin, R. v Smith, R. V 219, 32ti, 477, 489, 4JK), Smith ( Williain), lie Smith V. R Smith, E J" parte Solomons, R . v Societv for Prevention of Cruel- ty to Animals v. Graetz Sol'tau V. De Held Somerset v. Hart Soper, R. V Somerset v. Wade Somerville v. Mirehouse Southey v. Nash Southwick, R. V 2i), Spain, Re Sjjarham, R. v Sponsonby, R. v Spotland, R. v Spring V. Anderson Sproule, R. v St. Amour v. Corp. St. Francois de Sales St. (ieorge, R. v Stainforth, R. v . . . . Stapvlton, R. V Statlbrd, R. v Staffordshire, .T. .!., R. v Stallion, R. v Stanton, R. v Starkey, R. v 22, Stephens v. Myers Stephens v. Stephens Stephens v. Watson Steward, R. v Stimpson, R. v Stockton, R. V Stone, R. V 32, lOt, Story V. Chall lUds Stripp, R. V Suffolk, J. J., R. V Surrey, .1. J., R. v Surrey, R. v 54, Suter, R. V S wendon's Case Swindall, R. v A(iK 510 89 89 4m 472 3.57 .534 478 52 198 69 SH 215 33 658 20 63 2I(i .597 327 (!71 108 660 513 629 441 ;W2 571 47 204 .590 ti35 3:i3 547 41 40 27 585 4.55 20 317 .587 40 4.50 295 ;M3 ^5(i KMi 582 650 34 20 327 m.) 203 20 2!' 3lti .531 428 ,569 TAHI.E OK CASKS. XXIX Svlvi'sti- Syiiioiis, •, V. S. li. v.. Paiik .. 471 .. 3U 'I'iiccv. H. V I'afl," I{. V 'I'arrv v. Newman ■I'iivll.r. Hi I'a'vl"!'. li- v.. 8fi!t, 453, 404, 4fi7, 'I'liylor, V. Oriiin Ti.ylDi >'. Siiietton Tt-anue, H. V I'ha.Mi-, I{. V riu'Xtmi, R. V ■I'liomas, H. V 213, (K«», '^il()IUll^oll, R. V 213, ■riimliorn, R. v «5H, TidltT. R. V 'I'illadani v. Rristol Inhabitiints Tiiiiiiuiis, R. V 'riiiisoii, K.r parte. Tisdalf, R. V TolU'v, H. V Took!', R. V 'I'otiuss, R. V 'I'owci.s, R. V Townlev. W. v 'I'ract'y, R. v Train, 1{. v Trogaitlien, R. v 'I'uckwell, R. V TuUcv V. C'orric lunuT, R. V 49H, 519, 'I'uriU'i' V. Rostniaster-Geii 'rni'sU'toii, R. V Tu icklcr, R. v 'I'wosf, R. V Tyrcl, R. V 025 540 44 317 003 307 «13 545 505 \M\ 0(W ('><)2 («il 024 («» am 371 5:hi 0!» 27 20 502 575 220 029 421 00 434 509 32 430 210 454 497 I'sill V. Hrea.sley 008 (.'hirke 00« Iliilfis 008 N'aiR' (Lord) Case of 421 Vau-'han, R. v 57, 204 N'aiix's Case ,59 Villcnskv. R. V 049 \'iiicciil, R. V 480, 524 Vokc, H. V 451 Wailo, R. V Wagstair, R. V Wakolii'ld V. West Riding and (irinishy liy Wallace, hj.v nurte Wallac,., R. V WallinKford, R. v Walls, R. V Walker v. Brewster Walker, R. v Walklev, R. V Walne.'R. v Walsh, R. V Walton, R. V 059 («i5 32 31 3:^0 55 (toO 582 295 214 534 059 050 FA(iK Ward, R. V 03O AN'are v. Staiistuad 22 Wari'iufiliani. H. V 213 Warw 'id<sliairs Case 213 Warwickshire Slicrill', R. v 32 Wasoi., R. V 324 Wasoii V. Walter 008 Watkins v. Major. ;W, 35 Watson, lif 371 Watson, R. V 522 Watson (Leminnl) and others, Re 368 WattH, R. V 203 Weale, R. v 22 Wehster, R. v 41 Weeks v. Honhain 693 Weir V. Snivth 9 Wellard. R." v 573 Welcii, R. V 023 Welnian, R. v 5;« Weltje, R. V 39 W.dsh, R. V 511, 599 West, R. V 5:«, 024 West Ridin^MVorA-.s-) .1,1., R. v.. 'Xfl West V. Small wood 44 Wes.lake. R. v 58ft Westlev, R. V 205 West wljod, R. V 489 Whalen, Ex parte (02 Whatelv, R. V 43 Wheeler, R. v 494 Whitchurch, R. v 323 Wliite, A'.i- jmrte 000 White, K. V 200, 427 AVhite V. Beckham 505 White v.tJardiier 532 Wliitehead, R. v 359 Whitenian. R. v 025 Whittier V. Dihlde 4S Whictingham, R. V 022 Wliittle V. Frankland 319 Wigg, R, V 519 Wild, R. V 214 Wild's Case 400 Wilev, R. V (U7 Wilkins, R. V 435 Wilkinson, R. v 659 Wilks, R. V 540 Williams, R. v , 40 276, 327, 330, 471, 498, 589 V'illiams v, Adams ;ifl William Smitli, Re 327 Williamson, Ex jxirte 4 Wilson's Case 36 Wilson, R. V 220, 432 Wilson V. Stewart 441 Wiltshire, R. v 475 Windmill Loc. Bd. of Health v. Vint 503 Wittman, R. V 500 Wood, Com. V 514 Woodhead. R. v 524 Woodhouse, Ex parte 58ft X X X TABLE OP CASES. PAdK VVoodlDck V. Dickie 001 Workington Overweers, R v 'M Wiiiv V. Toke 31fi Wri^iiit, H. V 477, 540, («)H Wrottcsli-y, R, V : :« Wynne, R. v (Hil Yiirl pole, R. V 20 Pack Yea, R. V 40 Yeiidon, H. v 277, 404 YounK V. Siiylor ;W YouiiKiV I'itts, R. V 42 YounK V. Higf^ins .52 YounK, R. V. ;«1, ;«4, 490 Zoucli V. Empsey 72 INTRODUCTION. ORIGIN OF THE OKFICK OF JUSTICE OF THE l*EA('E. I<iai*l.i KiikIImIi €'4»iiriN. — The icrritonal divisidns liciii'inir ii|ii)ii tlic sulijcct nt till- inliiiinisl nilinii ol' justice in lMiii;liiiiii. at iho time of till- Xui'iiinii ( 'oiKiiU'st, were tin' K l.Vd hum, t lie iin nty or SIIIKK. ill!' IIINHUKI) III' WAPKNTAKK. illlil tilt' I'lrillNCi. I'l >\V NS|| If or I'AKisii. llic iiTciitci' towiisliiits l)i'inif callt'd 6a/7ts. Tlic Iluiidivds or Wa|H'iital<fs were larn'c dist ricts or divisions ot' t lie ( "oiinl y ; and tlic tow iisln|is. titiiinys. iiarislii's, and burh^, or Itoronu'lis. wi-i'i' sniidivisions of tlic llundivd. Vav cacli county or sliirc tlicrc was an e<ddon)ian. — (whose ot1ici> l)ceanic. alioiit tin' time ot tlie Coininest. nicri^i'd in the titnlar dii;-nity of an earl ). — and there was also a viscount or sheriff tor ea(di county. Tlu're were, for cacli township or lithinji'. a reeve and foni" other |irinci|ial inhahitants, and their was, vi'ry likely, a chief officer for every liun<lrcd. This orii;aiiization fornu'd the ])oliee .system of the eonntry. and, nominally, at U'ast, continues to the |treseii1 day. Kor Kiiy'land still has its shires witii their sheriffs, its liniidreds with — until IStJl), — tlii'ir hiii'h hailitfs. (diief constaMes. or other siudi otlicers. and its parislu's. townships, or tithini^s. with. — until IS72. — their pari.sli constahU's : althouydi the |)oiice functions of tliese \arious ollicerw wvvv. liefore tl'.c dates just mentioned, practically superseded hy mori' modern police arraiiyemcuts. From a perioil nundi iMiiier than tlii' Com^iiest. tiie Kinu; of Kiiiijland. had come to he rcifarded as tlu' " source of Justice, the lord and patron of his people, and the owner of the jiuidic lands.'' Occasionally, lu' I'xercisod his lii<;h ]treroa:ative of administering pistiee either ptTsonally oi- hy his offieers in inunodiatc attendance n INTIlKDICTroN. upon him. I>iit I In- rcifiilnr aiid stattMl mctliiMl of doiiii^ so was lliroii;;li tlic local coiii'ts, licid lictui-c Ills ollici-rs in tlii' Coimlii's und tiu- llundi'cds. i>u(di siu li coui'l hciiiii; in llic Mature of a |iul)lic mei'tin/ij iittoiidiMl by HpiH-iHod -suitors" or nu'inlu-rs. 'VUv suitors at the ![undn*d (-'ourt wrrc the parish priest, tlus reeve, and the lour prin('i|)al men of eaeli to\vnsiii|i in tiie Hundred ; and. at tlu' County <' )urt. the suitors were the same jiersons from every town ship. |)arish oi" tithini^ in the whole county, toifether with all the county's liind owners und puhlic olHcers. These County and Ilundreil Courts had <'ivil and ci'iminal jurisdiction. On the erimiiuil side the Court was called t lie ^owrn or circuit of the Sheritf, wiio. wIkmi the ealdorman's oHice was merged in the eari, became, in connection with tlu- administration of justice, the chief officer of the county; and then' appeals, in reality, to have been no distinction, for the ))urposes at least of (Ti'mmai jurisdiction, bet ween thi' Hundred Court and the County (Jourt ; the Shevitf's tourn or circuit Iteing simply the County Court held in and for a particular Hundred. Tlie Court seems to have consisted of tlu- suitors collectively-; but a representative body of twelve men (possibly the predecessors of the Grand Jury of later time.s), appears to have been instituted as a Judicial Comniitteo of the Court. The procedure eonsistod oi' accusotion and trial; the accusation being made either by the above meiitioned Committee, by the reeve and the four ])riiu'ii)al men of a townshij). or by a private accuser ; and, as the ])roceedings Avere conducted orally, the mem- orials of the Court wore entrusted to the recollections of the Witan. the Judges by whom tin; decrees were pronounced ; so that if evidence was required of judicial transactions, the proof was made by the Hundred or the Shire in its corjiorate capacity, the suitors bearing witness to the jiulgments jtronounced b}' them or their predecessors. (1) I>o('liii<' ot'the County or Hundred <'oiirtN. — It will thus be seen that, before the Conquest, the ordinary Court in (1) 1 Steph. Hist. Cr. L., 65-68. INTItnlHCTinN. Ill criiiiiiial tiiscs was tin- ("tuiiity ur lluiidrixl C'oiirl, whii-li, liowovor, wiis siil.icct to till' 1,'t'tu'ral sii|u'rvisi(iii iiiiil <'()Mcurn'iit jurisdictioii nfilic Kiiin's ("(iiirt : ami tlu' saiiu' stall' dT iliiiii;-s was ('(iiiliiiiicil liv tlic ('(iiKiuiTiir and liis sons, with this (lilli-fi'iicc. liiat'thf supfrvisinii ot'tlic Ivins^'H Court and thi- I'Xfiviso <it' its coiu'iiriviit jm'isdicliDM wiTf ifrailually incrcasi'd and tlic jurisdiction and iinpoi'tanci' of tin- local coufts were i,n'adiwilly narrowed and diin- iiiisiicd : aid as llic Kiii;j;"s Court di'velo|K'd into the Court ot Kinu;s lU-iuh and tho Courts of tiic Kini^'s .Iiisticcs of Assize Ovfi- and Terminer and Caol I)elivoiiv. and as the exercise of tlie criminal jurisdiction of these Courts and of the (Quarter Sessions oft lie local Justices of tiu' I'eacc, estahlished under Hdmird III, Itecame more and nutre j^encral. tiie ri'sult was tinit. in the rcii^n of Kdward IV, the County Court, althoui^h it still retained a separate existeiico, wiiH virtually ahoiishod. 4'<»iiN('i'% Htoi'M ol tilt' ■■«MM*«'. — The^mce in its hroaiU-st scMsc coni|>risc<l the whole of the criminal law. ALost offences were said to he ai^ainst the peaci'. and all tiio.so magistrates who hail authority to take coifnisance of criminal otfences wore con- sidered as i;;iiardians aud conservators of the ])eace, ex officio. Sue h. for instance wero tlie Kini!;s .Justices, the inferior Judi^es, and the Sheriffs, Ileeves, Constahles, Tithing men, lleadboi-oughs, and .so on. The other keepi'rs and conservators of the peace, — custodes or comervatores pads, — were tiio.se wlio, — without having any othei' ottice, — were simply and merely conservators of the peace, either hy prescription, or hj'the tenure of their lands, or l)y liaving lieeii elected hy the freeholders asseinhled in full County Court, in pursuance of the writ directed for that purpo.se to the .Sheriff (l)- IiiNtitiitioii ofJuNticfM ot the Peact'.— The statute instituting Justices of the peace, — 1 FaUv. Ill, st. 2, c. Iti, passed in IH27. — ordained tluit. for the hetter maintaining and keeping of the i)eace in every county, goo<l aud lawful men should he assigned hy commission of the king. The election of conservators of the ])eacewas tlius taken from the people, ami their appointment given (1) 2 Steph Comm., ()42-644; 2 Reeves i:ng.L. (Finl.) 228, 329. IV INTKiilil ( TKi.V, to the Kini,'. Hut, altlioiiLch l»y tlic 4 Kdw. Ill, <■. 2. (wliicli coii- tiiim-d also llu' rc^iilatinns tor a|>|H)iiiiiii!^ tin- .luKticcs of Assi/c and (iaol hdivciT ),^ — ^lln' powers oi' the new coiiscrvalors cij' (lie licaci' wcrt' incrcast'd, and althoinjli \<\ ilic is Kdw. Ill, st. 2. c. '2. it waw I'liat'tcd tiiat, wlicii lu'cos.xarx . t hey — jointly with nthers wite and Uarned in the laiv. — slioidd lu- nssii^ued. hy tin- Kiii;,;s ('oimiiis >ioii, to hear and tleJermine in\\\\i\H\ otlcuci's, — tliey were not called ./(Mfj'ccs of the peace milil. hy latei' lei^islatioii, they, themselves. independent I ij of others learned in the law, wei-e empowered to hold courts, four times in l lie year, for I he t rial of criminal otVeiiders ( 1 ). Oculioii <>r ilioir Niiiiiiiiary J.ji*iM«li«*(li4»ii. — \\y successive statutes the powers e.xereisulile liy .luslices in \Miarter Sessions foi- the ti'ial of otfeinlers were miwdi e.xlemled ; Imt they had MO ^I'lieral powers of summaiw e(mviction. and, except in cases i)ftoreil)le entry (2). or of riot (;{). or on the coutession in certain cases, ol the |)arty (duiriji'il (4). they could oidy proceed aecordinii; to tiie common law modi' of trial liyjury. until the passiui<; ot t he '1 Ih'U. T, c. .5, liy which individual .lustices weri- authorised, at their discretion, to hear and <letei'mine ujjon iid'ormalion (tor the king) all otfeuccs, short of felony, against any statute then in Iteing. Under this statute Justices of the Peace were i-nahled to. summarily, and without any preseiitnu'ut or trial ly Jury, deal with and punish all oti'ences short of felony. Hut it was repealed hy the I lien, S, e, (! ; and the earliest instance which wi- find re- corded of a Hummary conviction hy a .lustiee of the Peace, upon a pi'ual statute, is one rendei'ed on the statute IJIJ JTeii, S. c. (i. against the practice of carrying dags or short guns. (5). In the reign of .lames I. great additions were made to the |)owers of Justices of the Peace : and the pjissing in that and the two fol- lowing veigns of numerous statutes res[)ecting ale hou.ses. |(rofane swearing, drunkenness, embczzloment, the excise, the regulation ot (1) 34 Edw. Ill, c. 1; 3ti Kdw. Ill, st. 1, c. 12; 2 Steph. Com., (;44 j 2 Keeve's Ent?. L. (Fin).), 330, 332. (2) 12 Ric. 1. c. 2. (3) 13 Hen. 4, c. 7. (4) 2Hen. 5, St. l,c. 4. (5) Paley Bum. Conv. (5 Ed. 10. INTKiinrcTKlN, Ira.l.', iiihl III.' (lam.. Act ( I'l.' aii.l li.i Car. 2. c. 2.')). .)ccasi.,iu'.l a niDiv h-c.|iiciit ivcouiNi. to llu' <'.\i'rfis(. oftlu'ir.siiiiiiimiy junsdii'- tioii. ( I ). At lirst. the jii(|o;Mifiils <•(• 111,' .liistic(.s <,(tl„. ['..aci" wciv final. Tlicrc was no apjical tV<im ii .lii.sticc s dccisioii in simnnurv Mialt.'i> until the 22 Cm: 2, c. I.— called l Iw ('..nvcnticic Act.— jraVc arit,'!.! «)fa|.lK-id t(. the vi-rdict ofajiii-y iit llu- n.'xt (^^ul•lc«l• So.sHion.s : uiul tlii.s was sliortly iiftorwanls ulttToil. liy (iu" '2.2 and 2:i Car. 2 f. 2r>. lo an a|i|u'al to tiic .Insticcs in Se.ssions. witliont a Jiirv. (2) (.-'). (1) Kerr's Mag. Acts, 2, :5; Carter, 22. (2) f'lirter, l'.'!. FIRST DIVISION. Appointment of Justices of the Peace and Police Ma(jistrates : aM their Powers. Duties and Responsibilities. ClIAPTKE I. JrSTICES OK TIIK I'KACE. How Coiistitlitt'd. — ,lusti^•o^s of the peare avo gonorally (lividc'd into two ilasses. nanu'ly, those who are such by virtue of and while hohiiuif some otlier otHee, and those who arc eonstituted such hy conunission. •IllNtic't'N Kx-01li«*io. — Of those who are justiees of the ]H'a(e by virtue of and wliile lioldini; some other ottiee are the Judu^es of all the Su]>erior Courts of hiw, inehuliiig the Supreme and Kxeliequer Courts of Cana«hi, the Supreme Court of Judicature in Ontario, and the Court ot (Queen's Bench of the province of (^(U'hec ; (1) and every ])olice or sti[)endiary magistrate, recorder, nniyor, alderman, counsellor and reeve is, during his tenure of ottice as such, a Justice of the peace ex officio. (2) Kvery comndssioner of police ap])ointed hy commission of the (Jovernor (ieiu'i'al in council, for anyone or more of the provinces, territories, or districts of Canada, or for any one or uiore of the districts or counties in any province, territory, or district or for any temporary Jmlicial district in Ontario, is given, for the carry- ing out of the criminal laws and other laws of Canada the right of (1) R. S. O., c. 71, sec. 1 ; R. S. il, Art. 2447. (L') R. S. Q., Arts. 2485, 24S9, 2492 ; R. S. O., c 72. sec. 18 ; C. S. B. C, (1888), c. 78, sec. 3 ; R. S. Man., (1S91), c. 93, sec W ; 52 Vic, (Que.), c. 79, s. s. 13, Ki. A I'HACTK'AI, oriltK Ti> JlAdlSTRATES. oxi'i-ci.-ini;-. witliiii tlu' limits of liis jiii'isdiftioii. all thf powci's. authority, rifjlits aiwl ])nvik'i!;fs liy law a|)]K'rtniiiinii; to jiistiri's of thi> peace ii;i'iierally. (1) Kvi'i'v commiNsioiu'r ami cvc'ry assistant coniinissioiu')' of tlio Xortli West Mounted I'olic-e Koree is vested with all the ])o\vers of two Justices ot the peace, under the Mounted Police Act, lSit4. or any other .\ct in force in tlie North West Territories; and evi-ry supt'rintcndcnl of the force is ex officio a justice of the jieace. (2). For all tiie ]mrposcs of thi' Indian Act. or of any other Act re- sjjectinn- Indians, and with rey-ard to any offence ay'ainst tlie |»ro- visions of such Acts, or atfainst the provisions of Article !)S of the Criminal Code {Inciting Indians to riotous acts), or of Article l!ll) (Prostitution of Indian women), and with referi'nci' to any otfeiu-e !)y an Indian a<;'ainst any of the provisions of I'art Xlll of the Criminal Code (Offences against morality), cwvy Indian a,ii:(!nt is e.i- offlcio a Justice of the I'eace. and is vested with the power and authoritv of two .Instices of tlu' I'eace. anywlu're witinii the terri- torial limits of his jurisdiction, as di'tined liy his appointnii'Ut or otlu'rwisi." detint'd hy the (iovei-nor in Council, whether the Indian oi" Indians chari^ed with or in any way concerned in or att'e(;te(l i)y the otience. matter or thiny- to he tried, invi'stiu'ated or dealt with, art' or ai'c not within his ordinary jurisdiction, (duirye or supervision as an Indian a.nH'iit : (3) and in the N'oi'th West terri- tories, and in the jn'oviiu'es of .Manitoha and Biitish Columhia. every Indian aifent is, tor all siudi ))ur])0ses. and with ivspect to any smdi offence as aforesaiil. a justice of tlii^ |)eace p..x-ojficio. and has the power and authority of two justices ot the |ieace any- wlu'rt' in the said territories or jirovmces within wliich his aijency is situated, wliether or not the territorial limits of his juris- diction as a justice, as dctined in his a|i)iointnient or otlu'i'wise de- tiiied. e.xtend to the phu'c where he may havi" occasion to act as su(di justice or to exercise such ))ower oi' authority, and whether the Indians charged with ov \\\ any way concerned in ov att'ected (1) R. S. C, c. 184, 8.8. 1, ;!. (2) .'>7 and .')8 Vict., c. 27, sec. 0. (3) 57 and .")8 Vict., c. 32, sec. 8. .irSTICKS OF TI!K PKACK. KX (iKKirro. '^ liy tlu' offi'iicc. inattor or tliiiii;" to lie triod. iiivostif^atod or other- wise (U'iilt with, an' or arc not within liis ordinary jurisdiction, cliariiH' or su])rrvision as Indian aj^tMit. (1) The Governor General in coiineil may, l>y tlie retfuhitions to he niaiU'. from time to time, for the enforcement of the ]»rovisions of tile (Quarantine Act, constitute any (luarantine otticer to he, hy virtue of ins ottice or employment, a Justice of the peace for and in connection with the ((uarantiiu' station to which he is assigned, whether su( h otticer lie otherwise (jualiticd oi' not. (li) Kvery fishery officer appointed undei- the Fishery Act is. for all the pui'posesof the .\ct and the ri'n'ulations nuule under it. a justice of tiie peace ex officio within tlie district for whitdi he is ap|)ointed to act as such fishery officer. (3) ruder the •■ Dominion Elections Act." every returning officer and every deputv returning officer is. from the time of his falling the oath ofotfici'. on the occasion of an election, until the day after tlie closing of the election, a conservator of the peace, with all the jiowevs a](|iertaiiiing to a justice of the peace. (4) Some of the provincial statutes confer similar powers upon returning officers and tlu'ir di'puties during elections for the local legislatures. (5) And on the occasion of any poll for taking the votes of the electors of a county or city for and against the adoption of ii petition for hringing the • Canada Ttmperance, Act " into force, every returning officer and every deputy returning officer is. from the timeof taUiiig his onth of office until the day after the summing u|iof the vott's. a conservator of the peace investeil with all powers appertaining to a justice of the peace. (6) Whenever a vessel of Her Majesty's Xavy enters the (lulfofSt. Lawrence. cver\- otficer attached or helongino- to such vessel, and (1 ) 57 and 5S Vic, c. 32, sec. 8. (2) R. S. C, 0. 08, sec. 5. (3) K. S. ('., c. !)fi, sec. 2. (4) R. S. C, c. 8, sec. 73. (5) See R. S. Q., Art. 3!).-,, and ;V, Vict., (Ont.), c. 3, siec. 137. (0) R. S. C, c. 106, sec. do. 4 I'HACTICAI. (ilJlDK TO MAOISTR.VTKS. lK)l(lini;; llio ('oiniiiissioii of vicc-adiiiiral. |iost-cii])tiiiii. caiitiiiii, or conimaiKU'r in Ilcr .Majesty's iiavv. and any lit'uti-nant in siicli navy, liavinu; tlio comnnind of any sue li vessol is, while siioh vessel remains witiiin the limits of the iirovince of (i\U'\)Vi\ ex officio a justice of the peace for the districts of (Jaspi'. SaLfuenay and Rimouski, without takina; any oath of ottice and without being subject to the general requirements of the law as to residence and property qualitication. (I) •lllNti<'«'N hy C'oiiiitiiNMioii. — Of this class are those com- monly known as Justices assiifneil to keep the ])eace in and for some ])artieular county, district, or place. Their u]>|>oiiitiiii'iit in <'uiiudu. — Although the prc- ro<i;ative riijht to a])])oint Justices of the i)eace within the Dominion of Canada and in eacdi of the |)rovinces is e.xerciseable by the ("nnvn, directly, the power to up})oint them is also vested in the Dominion Government by virtue of the British North America Act ; but as the administration of Justice is by that Act delegated to the provinces, the appointments are, for that reason, and by virtue, moreover, of various Acts of the Dominion and Provincial legislatures, invariably made in each province by the Jjieuteiumt (tovernor in council, who names, for each county, disti'ict or plaee^ any number that he may deem necessary. (2) In Ontario, Justices of the peace may be ■ J'pointed in and for any county, city and town, and in aiul for any provisioiuil Judicial, temporary Judicial, or territorial district or provisional county, or for any jtortion of the territory of the jtrovinee not attached to any county for ordinary' municipal or Judicial purposes. (3) The Lieutenant-Governor of Quebec a])))oints as Justices of the jteace in the several districts of the ])rovinee the most eflrtcient jiersons dwelling in such districts res])ectively : and all qualitied (1) R. S. Q. Art. 2567. (2) R. S. Q., Art. 2545 ; R. S. O., c. 71. sec. 3 ; R. S. C, c. 50, sec. 64 ; R. S. C, c. 53, sec. 23; R. v. Bush, 8 C. L, T. 131 ; R. v. Bennett, 1 Ont. R., 446 ; Ji^x parte Williamson, 24 Supr. Ct., (N. B.) 64. (3) R. S. O,, c. 71, sec. 3. JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. BY COMMISSION. 5 ])or8()iis so :i])pointC(l liiivf all llie ])<)\vi'rs. authoritit's. ri<;-lits and privileges ami are sul>jeet to all the duties, oldiifations and resjion- sihilities conferred or impo.sed upon Justices ot'tlie peace. (1) In till' ])rc)vince of Quebec the Lieutenant-tiovernoi- in ( 'ouiicil may also from time to time a])i)oint justices of the ]ieace with Jurisdiction extending outside the territorial limits assigned to any district or county in the 2)rovince and over places Avhich. though comprised Avithin the limits of a district, are in remote jiarts of the ])rovince ; and. in regard to any such justice, it is not necessary for him to he resident within or to possess any ])roperty qualitica- tion whatever in that pai't of the province for which he may bi- appointed or over which his jurisdiction may extend. (2) The Licu- tenant-tiovernor in Council may. moreover, by special commission. a])point one or more Justices of the peace with Jurisdiction extend- ing over the whole of the jirovince of Quebec, oroversuch districts as may l)e na..ied in such special commission ; every justice so appointed being invested with all the rights and ])owers of one or more Justices of the peace ; and it being unnecessary for him to ivside or possess real estate in the province. (3) In each of the Provinces of Xova Scotia and New Brunswick the Lieutenant-Governor ma}' appoint, in and for the sevei-al and respective counties of the Province, such justices of the peace as may be deemed expedient and ])roper. (4) The Lieutenant-Ciovernor of the Xorth AVest Territoi-ies of Canada may ajjpoint justices of the' jieace, with jurisdiction as such throughout the Territories. (5) And the CTOvernor-General of Caiuida in Council, or such 2)erson as he de])utes for the purpose, may a])])oint game guardians in the Xorth West Territories to can-y out the ])rovisions of the North West Game Preservation Act, 18!t4 ; and. after taking the oath of office prescribed by the Act. every gaine guardian so ajipointed has. for the pur])Oses of the Act, within the district for which he is a])]iointed game guardian, all (1) K. S. Q., Arts. 2545, 2562. (2) lb., Arts. 25ti5, 256(5. (3) K. S. Q., Arts. 2572, 2573, 2574. (4) R. S. N. S. (1884), c. 101, sec. 1 ; C. S. N. B. (1877), c. 2i), sec. 1. (5) R. 8. C, c. 50, sec. 64 ; 57 & 58 Vic. c. 17, sec. 7. G PRACTICAL (iriDK TO MAdlSTltATKS. tlu' jiDWors (ila .lustier ol' tlu' IV'acc in and lor tiii' North West Torritorics. (1) In .Manitol)a. jnstioi's of tiic |n'ac(' may lio ajipointt'd liy tiu' Lit'Uti'uant-liovt'i-nor in or tor any city, town or other muiiici- l>aHty in the Provinee, or for the whole Province ; and tliey must he ciiost'n from the most competent persons dvvellini>; in the places for whieii tiiey are ajijiointed. (2) And the Lieuteiiant-tiovernor of Manitoi)a — wiio is ex-officio Lieutenant-Governor also of Keevvatin. u se])arate district of the North West Territories — is authorized to ap]ioint justices of the |)eace for the Keewatin district. ("5) In Uritish Columhia. Justices of the ])eace may i)e appointi'il in and for any eounty or electoral district in the Provinee. or in or for any less extensive jurisdiction. (4) The Commission aii])ointin^ Justices of the jieaee may be general or special. It is a ii-eneral commission of the ])eace when it names or replact's all the Justices of a certain district, coutity or |)lace : and it is special when it names oni' or moi'c Justices to 1)C added to tlu' ii'enrra! commission. The commission, whether i^enoral or special, bears the siifuature of the Jiieute\iant-( Jovernor and the i^'reat .seal of the Froviiu'c wlu're it is issued. It is addri'ssed to the persons therein uanu'd, and it is sent to and remains deposited with the clerk of the ])eace. I*r«l»«'rty <|llHlili(*»tioil. — With rei>:ard to a Justice of the jieace who is sueh exqfficio. no ))i'o])erty timilitication is required of him. and some of the statutes exi)ressly declare that the ])rovi- sions of the law as to jjroperty qualitication shall not ap])ly to the .Members of Her .Majesty's l^LKCcutive Council, nor to the .ludu'cs of the Su])reine Court of Judicature, or of the courts of (Queen's Bench or of the County courts, nor ti) any i)olice maii'ist rate, nor to Her .Majesty's Attorney-Ceneral. nor to any of Her Ma- (1) 57 and 5S Viet., c. 31, sec. 22. (2) li. S. Man. (1S!)1), c. 93, ss. 4, 6. (3) E. S. C, V. 53, 88. 3, 4, 23. (4) 55 Vict. (B. C), c. 29, sec. 6. QIAI,ll''l(ATIn.V. jcsty's ( 'oiinsi'l Ifjinicil in llic liiw. who. \>y reason of tlicir otticn, :trc justicrs of llu- |ii'ii('i'. iioi' )o iiiiy mayor, iildcniuin. coiiiicillof. rt'i'vr or (lf|iuty reeve of any ninnici|iality wlio is ex o{fi(v'o a justice of tlie Jieaee. (\) Hut. a justice ot (lie peace appointefl liy contniission. must as a rule, have a property qualitication. In tlie jirovinet's ot Ontario ami (^uel)ec it is s|ieeiall\- enacted that in ail cases not otherwise ju'ovided liy law. no person shall he a Justice of the |ieace, or act as siudi within any district or place, (except. — as to the province of (^uehec. — the Magdalen Islands. and the counties of Chicoutimi and Say-uenay). uide.ss he has in his actual possession, for his own proper use. an interest in real estate, lyiii^ and heinij; witiiin tlu' |)rovince. of or ahove the vahu-of 81200, over and ahove all encumhrani'i's. rents and charii'es pavahle out of or aHectiuij: the sanu'. (2) In Manitoha. a Justice of the peace must, in all cases not olhei'wise i)i'ovi<led. he the owner, in fee siiujile. for his own proper use, of lands lyini;- and heiny- in that province, ot or ahove the net value of goOO. ovei- and ahove wluit will satisfy and diseharn'e all eiu'\imlirances affecting- the same, and over and ahove all rents and chai-yes payaiile out of or attectinj;- I he same : (:{) and in the .North west Territoi-ies. a Justice of the peace must he the owner in fee simple of lands there of tlu- not value of 8:30(1. and have hcen three years resid in <-• in the Territo- ries. (4 flatll or 4tiiulili4'alioii.— A Justice of the peace, mimed l.y y,'eneral or s|)i'cial commission, must, hetore actin-.' as su(di. take and suhscrihc an oath that he has the property (jualitication i'e(|uin'd hy the law of his pi-ovince. In the province of (^uchec the oath of (jiialificati..n is taken l>efore the clerk of the peace, or hetore .some Justice (.f the peace I'M- (he disiricl for which the new Justice intends to act. or hefore a commissioner cliaro-ed l.y dedlmus potesiaiem to administer oaths :ind receive declarations, and it must he in the tWliowiny- foi'in ;— 24,S8^ '^4ni' -vV»' '^' '''''■ " ' ^' ^' ^^^''' ^^'''^^^' "■ '*^' '^''" -' ' ^- ^- '^•' ^'*'- VI) K. S. O., c. 71, sec. 9 ; R. 8. Q , Art- 2547. (a) K. 8. Man. (1801), c. 93, sec. 9. (4) 57 & 5S Vic. c. 17, sec. 7. 8 l'UA( TICAI, (II [|)K Til JIAdlSTKATKS. ■1, A. H.. ill) swciir lliiit I truly and bond fide \mi\<'. \i> and i\iy mv own |ir<>|ifr use iuul lifiu'tit. siicli an estate {sfn'citijing the some by its local description, rents, or nni/thiiKi else), as dotli ipialitV me to act as a Justice of tlie |teace for tlu' district of. accordiui;- to llu' true intent and nu'unini; of section second of diajiter fourtii of title sixtli of the .UeviHod Statutes of t lie Province of (^ueiiec. ri'spectiiiiC tiie (|ualitication of jiistices of tlie peace; (lint lire of such estate, whether land, and if land, designatimj it), and that the same is lyiny; and heiuif. (or issuiui^out of lands, tenoments and hereditaments, situate) within the township, {jarish or seigniory) ,,(• (or in the si'vei-al townsliips ( parishes or seigniories) of (or as the case may be). So help me (iod." (1) In tlie |)rovincc of Ontario tin' oath of (lUalitication must he taken within three months from the date of the commission under which the justice is appointed, or the commission so far as it relates to him, is deemeil to lie ahsolutely revoked and cancelled. (2) it is taken hefore some other .lustice of the I'eacc or liefoiv any jierson a))l)ointed hy the Lieuteiuint-(iovt'rnor to a<lminister oaths and declarations, or hefore the clerk of the peace for tlu' county or district for which the new justice intend.- to act. and it must he in the following; form : " I. A.H., do swear that I truly and bond fide have to and for my own proju'r use and henetit such an estate as iiualities me to act as a justice of tlu' ])eace for the county, (or as the case may he), of _ accordiuij; to the. true intent and mean- ing of the Act reH])ectini>,- the qualification and appointment of justices of the jieace. to wit. {nature of such estate, whether land, and if land, designating), and that the same is lying and heing, (or, is issuing out of lands, tcnoments and hereditaments situate), within the townshi]) (or. in the several townsliips. or. as the case may he) of So help me (Jod."' (H) In the ])rovince of Manitoha the oath of qualitication is taken (1) R. S. Q., Art. 2547. (2) 54 Vict., (Ont.), c. Iti, sec, 2. (3) R. S. 0.,c. 71.8. 10. (lATIl III' (ilALIKICATlnN. {) Jii'lorf some jii>lici' III' t lie |K'iict' or (M licr pfi'soii autlioi'izi'd to tako alli(lii\ ils. ,ni(l is in the t'oHowiiin' t'oriii ; "I. A. 15.. of in tlic province of Manitoba, <lo .swear llnit I Inilyand bond fide liave, to and for my own proper use and iienetit. an estate in tee simple in lands situate in tlu- province ot .Manitolia of such a value as dotii (|ualifv uu' to act as u Justice of llie peace, accordinu,' to the I rue intent and meaninjj; of tiie statute in tiiat iKduilf. and that sucli lauds are the followinif : {fiarish, township, ranije etc.) So help me Ood." (1) In the North West Teri'itories. the oath of <|ualitication is in a .similar form, and it and the oath of ottice must he taUen hefore tlu- liieulenant ( iovernor. a Supri'uie ( 'ourt judu'e. or .some other j\is- tice of the peaci'. (2) A certiticate ot' the oatli of (pialification luiviuif l)een so taken nnd suhscrihed must in the provinces of (^uehec and Ontario he forthwith de]tosited.— hy the justice of the jieace who has taken the «anu'. — with the eh-rk of the peaei- lor the district or county witlnn whiidi the newly a]ipointed justice is to act ; (:>) and in tlie ])rovince of .Manitoha such a certiticate must ho fortliwith (leposited in tlu' ottice of the provincial secivtary. (4) If the land u|)on wiiicdi a Justice of tlu' peace qualifies he moi't- juraged. it will he sutticient. if over and ahove the amount of tlu- inorti>-ai,'e it he of the ni't value rc(|uiri'd hy the law tixin<r the pro]ierty ([ualitication. (5) Tlie (>i^e/rsn)f a Justice of the peace in property in respect of whi(di he (|iudities as such, under the H. S. O.. c. 71, sec. 9. need not he in itself worth $Um. It will l,e sutticiont if ho hnxo. inlands which are of the raluf ot ^Vim over and above what will satisfy and discharge all encumbrances affecting the same, such an estate or inter- est as is nuMitioned in the section, no matter what may he the actual value of the estate or interest whi(di he possesses, ((i) (I) K.S. Man., (1891), c. 93, 8- 9. (■J) 57 <& 58 Vic. c. 17, sec. 7. t;i) K. S. Q., Alt. 2548 ; E. S. 0., c. 71, s. 12. (4) R. 8. Man. (1891), c. 93, p. 10. (5) Frazer v. McKeiizie, 28 U. C. Q. B., 255. (B) Weir v. Smyth, 19 App. Rep. (Ont.), 433 ; 12 ('. L. T. 347. 10 l'U\<TI<"AI, lil IliK TO M AfilSTIIATES. A |pi'rs()ii wlio iicis iis ii Justice dI' I lie iiciicc witlmnl li:iviii;f liiUi'ii or HuliHci'ilii'd (111- oiitli of (|iiiiliti(iiti<iii i>v wiilioiil ImviMt!; till- ri'(iiiii'('<l |ir()|icr1y (lUiiliticiitioii is iiiilili' In :i |iciiiilty. wliicli in ciicli (tf llu' |ir<)viiic('s ol' (^iiclicc. Oiitai'in iiiid Mjiniloiiii is (ixcd al 61tl(». (1) Mill iintw itiisliiiiiliiii;- liis liiilii!ily to a pi'iially. it seems lliat wliei'e a pei'soii. uliost' name is in t lie commission, acts as a jnst ice of t lie peace, witlioiit liavini'- tlie necessary in'operly (|iiali- ticatioii. his acts ai'e not. on tliat acco\iiit. invalid. (2) .\ ditfereiit rule. lio\\i'\i'r. prevails if a justice of the peace acts in a matter over wliicli lie lias no Jiirisdiclion : so tliat a Jiistici' ulio committed a man for a supiioscd oll'eiici'. wlicn. in fact, lliere was no aecusa- titiii an'ainsl liini. was held liahle to an action in I respass. (;{) .\ |ierson who assnmes to act as a .liisliee <if the Peace hy virtiu' of his lieinn" an aldi'rman of a city, and not under a c<miiiiissioii of the peace, is not K\ii;ally (|naliticd to so act as a .Instiee of the I'eace until he has taken the oath oj'tpmlitication re(|iiired of him as an alderman under the .Municipal .\cts. (4) Mut when lu' haslaUeii his oath of i|Ualitication as an alderman he docs not (as we ha\e alrt'ady seen) need any additional i»rt>perly (|nalificatioii. nor to taUe any further oalh. to eiiahle him to act as a .Instiee of tln^ I'eat'c ity virtue of his ottiee as an alderman. (5) llufliM of All4'K;iunc'0 uikI of 4^fli«'«>. — The new .rustici^ of the I'eact- must. 1 1 'fore eiilei'iiiii' upon tin' duties ot his ollit'c, take the oath of alicn'iance and an ojitli of ottiee. In the pro\iiice of ( )ntario these oal lis may Ik' lakt'ii hefore any other jiistict' of the peace, or hefoi'c any other person appointed hy the Jvieutenant-iioveriior to adniinisu-r oaths and declarations, or ln'fore thecK'rk of tlu' ])t'ace (d' t hi' county or district in wliitdi the new Justice is to act : and the oaths must then hv forthwith. transmitted or delivered to and tiled iiy the clerk of the peace of (1) R. S. Q., Art. 2ri!iO ; K. S. 0., c 71 , s. 1 ') ; R. S. Man., (1891), c. 93. s. i;5. (2) Margate I'ier Co , v. Haiinen & JJysoii, ;5 B. iV A., 26H ; R. v. Hodtjins 12 Ont.;Rep. ;i67. (3) Morgan v. Hughes, 2 T. R. 225 ; Lancaster v. (iraves, 9 B. & C. f)2S ; Mason V. Barker, C. & K. 100. (4) R. V. Boyle, 4 C. L. J., N. S., 25(5 ; 4 P. R. (Ont.) 2o(>. (5) R. S. O., c. 71, sec 2 ; R. S. Man- (1891), c. 93, .sec. 21, ci7. at p. 7 ante. OATHS (>!•' AI.I.Kdr.WrK A.\l» or orKICK. 11 llic coiiiil V or (listricl witliiii wliicli I lie new justice is to jut. (1) And cvci'v piTsoii ;i|)|)()iiitf(l a Jiistici' of the pciu'c in ()iitano, al'ti'f tlu' iiassiiiif ortlii'r)4 Vict.. (Oiil.). c. Ki. iiiiist. a<'coi-<liiii; to section '1 oi'tlial .\cl. tako tlic oatli ot'olficc as well as the oatli of ([iialificalion witliin three months froni t lie ilate of i lie conimission nndei' wliicli lie is a|i|)ointeil, oi- llic commission so far as the saino I'eiates to liini. is deemed to In' alisoluteiy revoUed and cancelled. In the iiroviiices of Nova Scotia and .New liniiiswiclv the new Justice is sworn Ind'ore the cli-i'lv tjf the |ieaic for tliw county or city and county for which sucii Justice is a|ipoiuted, and tju' clerk id' the peace must keep a ri'cord thereof. (:i) , In the province of lii-itish ("olumliia t he nafhs of alle^'ianei' and ^ ofotHeemusl lie taken liefore some oiherJusti<'e of the peace with- in t/iirti/ (\i\\s after the appointment, .ind they must witliin the same delay, he transmitted to the Provincial Seeri'lary to he tili'd hy him ai'.oMM' t|,,. recoi-ds (d' his oUice. Qi) ForillN <»r4»alli of AII«'u-iailC«'.— The tfeneral form of I he oath (d' allegiance is as follows: •• I. A. 15.. do sincerely promise and swear that I will he laithful and liear true allenianee to Her .Majesty (^ueeii N'ictoria {or the reigning Sovereign for the time being) as lawful Sovereiu-ii of tho United Kiiii^dom (d' (Ireat Mritaiu and livland. and of this l)omin- . ion of Canada. de|iendeiit on and helon^-iiii;- to the sai<l l\iiiy'dom and that I will defend Her to the utmo.st (if my [lowei' aii-ainst all Itraitoroiis conspii'acies or attempts whatever. Mliich shall he nuido laj^aiiist Her person, crown and diii-iiity. and that I will do my [Utmost endeavor to disclose and make known to Her .Majestw Her leirs or successoi's. all treasons or traitorous conspiracies and Isittempis wlii(di I shall know to he au-ainst Her or any of t hem ; rand all this 1 do swear without any e((nivoeation. mental evasion fov secret reservation. — So help me <iod.' (4) (1) R. S. 0.,c. 71,8. s. 11, 12. (2) R. S. N. S. (1884), c. 1(11, sec. 3; C. S. N. B. (1877), c 29, sec 3. (:'.) C. S. B. C. (ISSS), c. 7S, m\ t) ; 55 Vie. (B. C), e. -."J, sec. !). (4) K. S. C.,c. 112, 8. 1. 12 IMIACTICAI. (II IDK Td .MAlilHTIlATEH. Ill the province of IJritisli ( 'oluiiiliiii. flic I'onii of oiitli of iillr- yiiiiici' r('i|iiiml of t'\iT\ person appoinleil a Jiisliee of llie peiieo or a siipeiidiary iiia«,istrali' in as follows : (I) •• I (jo soloiniily pr<»iiiis»' and sweav liial I will lie faillifiil and liear true alle;;ianee to Her Majesty (^men Victoria. IKt lii'irs or successors. — So help me (Jod. (Si\fnature of Stipendinry j\Ta(jistrafe on J. P. Sworn and snhscrilied liy tlie said before inc. at this (lav of \.l). lH!t ForillM 4»f'Oalll <»!' fiflioo. — The ti.-eiieral forni<d'natli of idlici' is as follows : " I. A. 15.. do swear that I will well and truly serve oiir Sovereign T;a(ly. «^iieen N'ictoria. in the otiice of justice of the peace, in and for the district (or county, etc.) of and I will do riyht to all manner of people, uccordinu; to the laws and iisa!.::es (if tliis province, without fear or favor, alleclion oi- illwill. — So help nu' (iod." (2) In the I'rovinci' of ( )ntario the form of the oath of oftice is as follow.s : " I. A. I{.. of in the county of do swear that 1 will well and truly serve our Soveivifj^n Lady, {^ueeii Victoria, in the otticc of Justice of the peace, and J will do ri,u;ht to all manner of peoph' after the laws and iisai^es of tliis Province, without fear, affection or illwill. — So help me (Iod." (3) In the Province of IJritish Columhia the form of the oath of oftice to lie taken hy every person ajipointed a stipendiary magis- trate or a Justice of the peace is as follows : (1) C. S. B. C, (1888), c. 78, sec. 6- (2) Oke's Mag. Syn., 13 Ed., 5. (3) R. S.O, c 71, sec. 11. I'KllSnNS Willi CANMIT ACT AS .MMTICKS. 13 • I swciir tliiil. as a sti|M'iiiliary m;i,tci''ti'ati' (ni' iM-<licf III' ill.' |(i'iicc), for llic cnuiily (or clcfloral ili-lrict. ni' jiarl of till' I'lniiity or clri'lural ilisi i-ii'l) of ill tlic I'l'ovincc of Hriti-<li ( 'oluinliia. in all articlfs in tin- <^ni'i'n's nanic to nn- ilirrdt'd. I w ill do ('ipial rii^li' <o tlic poor and In I lie ricli, at'li'i' my I'lniniiiy'. wit and |po\vi'r. anil at'lcr I In- lawn and rnstoms ol' tlic realm and stalnli's tlicri'in made and that I will lake niitliinic for my otlii'c of sti|K'ndiary maifistratr to lie doiu' Imt of till- (^iit'cn, and fees acciistomi'd and costs limited liv statute. — So lu'lp me (iod. {Siijnnture of Stijiendutri/ Magistrate <>r J P.) Sworn and siiliserilied l>y tliesaid Iiefore me. at tliis ^ day of \.l).. 1S!I .-(1; l*('rM4»iiM l*iM»liil»if4>«l ir4»iii Avf iiiu' um .liiMti<'('M of til*' l"«'U«**». — ("I'rtain persons and ottieials are sonu'tiines pro- liiiiited IV.'in aetinu' as justices of the peace, h'or instance, the Ontario statute I'elatini;' to justices of the peace enacts that, ex- c('|)t where otherwise specially provided hy law. no solicitoi-in anv eo\irl whati'ver sliall he a Justice of the peace duri lit; tlie time he continues to practice as a solicitor ; ami tliat no person haviui;. usinii" or exercisiiiif tlu' ottice of slu-ritf oi- coroner, in and for any county, district or place in Ontai'io. shall he coinpetent or ([iialitiod to be H ju^tiee of the peaee. or to act as such for any county, dis- trict or |)laeo wherein he is sheriff or coroner, duriiii; the lime that he uses or exercises such otiice ; and that every act done hy ji sheriff or coroner hy autliority of any commission of the peace durini:; the time aforesaid shall he void. (2) in the province of (^)ui'hec. no coroner can act as a justice of the Peace in cases arisiiii;- out of facts which have heon the suhject of ail}' iii([uest held hy him ; and every act .s«) done hy sudi coroner is iilwolutely voiil. (3) (1) C. S. B. C. (1S88), c. 7cS, 9ec. <J ; .■)5 Vic.(B. C), c. 29, sec. 8. (2) R.S.O.,e. 71,88.7, 8. (:]) r)7 Vic. (tiue.), c. 26, sec. 1. u rKArTicAi, (aiOK to maciisthatks. \() shcrifV in tlic districls of (^iu'Ihh- iiiid Mmitrciil ciiii In' a jiistict' of tlu' |n'ii(H' for till' district wherein lie is slieritf. diiriiiy; tlie time lie exei'cises siieli oHice : and evt'iy act (loni- liy siudi slieritf. as a Justice of the peace diiriiii;- such time is al>solutely void. ( 1 ) When not otherwise specially provided hy law. no advocate can 1)1' a justice of tln' peace in and for any district f)f the ])rovince of (^hiehec dnriini,' the time he continues to practice his professiim. (2) In .Manit(diu. when not otiu'rwise proxidcd liy law, no harrister. attoriu'y. or solicitor in any court whatever, shall he ajipointed or act as a Justice of the I'eace in and for any jiovtion ot the province diiriiiii' tlie tinu' lu' continues to practice as sucdi. (H) ClIAPTKR II. Al'l'OINT.MK.NT Ol^' PoLICE MaiUSTRATKS. Ill Olltai*i4». — In the province of Ontario a .-^ilaried police maicisti-ate is apiiointed by the Lieutenant-Governor for every city and for every town haviiiii; more than o.ddO inhahilants. and also tor every other town. — that is, every town of less than r).(l(MI in- hahitaiits. — if two-thirds of tlu' inenihei's of its council pass a I'esolution atiirmiiii;' tlu' e.xpedii'iicy tlu'reof : tlu' salary of such l»olict' mas^'istrati' to he paid hy the city or town for which he is appointed. (4) The rjieutenant-(ioveruor may. moreover, at all times appoint an unsalaried police maii,'ist rate for any town ot' less than ,"),(H)n inhaliitants. without any resolution tVom its council. (5) (1) 57 Vic (Que.), c. 2(i, sec. 1. (2) K. S. Q., Art. 2540. IS) K. 8. Man. (ISOl), c. 9:5. sec. 7. (4) R. S. 0., c. 72, SH. I, 2, :5. (.')) lb., sec. 5. Al'r JINTMKNT DP I'llLICK >IA(ilSTHATKS. 15 A siiliirii'd )Hilicf iniiifist rail' may also In' appoiiitt'd tor am- (.•(iiinly ol' Ontario, wliose county I'oiiiicil |)a-<sf.s a I'csolution attirni- iiiif tlio oxjirdit-ncy tlu'ivol'. tin' salary of such m a u;! strati' to lio |iaiil liy I lie county ; (I) and every sucli county nia.u;ist rate is vested witli and exercises, witliin the county for which he is appointed, all the jiowers liy law appi'i'tainiuir to police nia^'ist rates appointi'il for cities : (2) and he need not lie actually resident within the county or district for which he is appointed (;>). The Lieuteiumt-Oovernor of Ontario may appoint more ])oliee maifistrates than one for any county oi- union of counties or disti'ict or part of a disti'ict in which the Canada Temperance Act or a like Act is in force ; and any sncii niai;-istrati' holds ottice durinii' jileas- ure. save that he ceases to lie s'lch |)oiice nuiij;ist rate in case anil from the tinu' that the said .\ct <ir any new Act sulistituted there- fore ceases to lie in force in the county or district or ])arl of a district aforesai<l. (4) The following- is the oath of otHce to be taken by a Police Magis- trate in Ontario : '• i. A. H.. of in the CVninty of do swear that I will well and truly servo our Sovereit>-n Lady, Queen Victoria, in the office of j)o]ico iua_s>:istrati'. and \ will do right to all manner of ]ieople. after the laws and usages of this Province, without fear or favoi'. affection or ill-will. — 80 help me God." (5) 'Phis oath may lie taken liefore any justice of the peace or before any pei'son appointed liy the Lieutenunt-Uovernor to administer oaths or declarations, or liefore the clerk of the peace for the eounty or district in which the police magistrate is to act. and it must W forthwith transmitted by him to the clerk of the peace. (C) (1) H. S. 0., c. 72, sec. 8. (2) Ih., sec. 12. (3) //)., sec. 15. (4) oO Vic. (Ont.), 0.11, seel. (5) K. S. 0., c. 72, ss. 22, 2.'?. ((i) lb. 16 I'KAc rrc.vi, oiidk t>> M\t;\sr\\\rv.s. In Onliirio ii |i(ilicc iiKm'ist rate ik'1'<|s nn |)ro|)crty (|ualiHciiti(iii. iini- lo takf ... _ otliiT tliaii llu' tDrcii'ttiiig' nalli. to oiiaMc liiiu to act as a jiisti(H' of tlic peace. (1) III 4|ii«'Ikm*. — 'I'lic lacut('iiant-( iovcnioi' of tlic I'roviiici' (jf (^iiclicc may a|ipoiiit sti|u'iiiliai'y inan-ist I'alcs. called judi^H's ot" the se^ssi()lls of the ]teace. for each of the cities of Montreal and (^ue- hec. with jurisdiction over tiie wiioh' Province, to execute the duties of justices of tlie peace and such otlier duties as may l>c from time to time directeil hy tiie provincial seci'ctary. foi- thi' more otiieient ailminist ration of the police witlun tlie limits of the sai('l cities. (2) and they are declared to he. in virtue of their ottico, justices of the peace f(n' the districts in which the said cities are respectively situate, with jurisdiction as su(di ovei' the whole Pro- vince and ^vith all tlu' )po\\i'rs and authority of any one or two justices of tlu' ]»(.'ace. as the case nniy recpiiri'. notwithstandini; that they may not ])ossess the property ([ualitication re(|uired l)y law of any other pi'rson performini;- the duties of jiistices of the ])eace. (;>) Befoi'e heyinning- to execute the duties of' his otticc every person appointed a judsje of the sessions of the peace for the city of (Que- bec or for the city of AFontreal must talce. hidbre a judije of the Court of (Queen's Hi-neh. or <>{' the Superior Court, the followiuij oath : " I. A. B.. do swear that 1 will faithfully, impartially and honestly, aeeordiuii' to the hest of my skill and knowledy-e. execute all the |)owers and dutit'sof a judn'e of sessions of the pi'ace. un- der and hy virtue <d' sections fourth and tifth of cha])ter third of title sixth of the iii'vised Statutes of the Pi'ovince of (^uehec." (4) Police magistrates imiy also he ap])ointed hy the Lieutenant- Govei'iior of (^uehec within any one or more districts of the Pro- vince or in any ju<licial district : and no ]»oliee mai^istrate so appointed need possess any property (lualitication, nor he domiciled (1) R. S. 0., c. 72, sec. 24. (2) R. S. Q., Art24S5. (3) lb., Art. 2488. (4) R. S. Q., Art. 2487. AI'l'DINTAIKNT OK I'lUJCK M \(i ISTHATKS. 17 oi' iiiiuiillv iTsiilcnt williiii any disfrici I'm' wliicli lie is ap- pointcil ; (1) ami tlic iiolicc iiiau'ist rates so aiipoiiitcd liave ami exercise ail tiie jiowei's and autliority, riiflits and iiriviley-es appor- laiiiinji' til ]i(ilice nia,u:ist rates of eities (exeejit as rey;ards ortencoM auainst niiniieipai iiy-laws an I as reii'ar<ls other purely inuiiieipa! matters), and all t lie powers and antlmrity. rin'lits and privileges appertainini;' to justiees ol' the peaee g-enerall}'. (2) III ^o«» ^>4*otia. — rpon the I'ejiort oi'a eommitteeaitiiointed ii|)on pt'tition in that liehalf hy thetJeiieral Sessions of any county or district in the I'mvinci' of \ova Scotia, any place mentioned in and assiii'ned liy su(di rejiort may. after com]iliance with certain tornnilitics. he formed into a police division, to wiii(di one or more stipendiary juslices are a]ipointcd frinn iimoni; the justices of the peace rcsidiuLC within tin- limits of such police division, the st'ke- ti( II heinii; made hy the majority of such justices asscnihled at, a ineetinif s|)ecially called forthat |iurposi' hy the clerk of the peace ; and the stipendiary justice or Justices s(j selected, or one of them, acts as a police court within the limits of the saiil division wiien- ever occasion re(|uircs or he or they thiidv necessary. (3) III .Ylaiiit4»b)l. — In .Manilidia the Lieutenant-dovernor ia Council may appoint one or more police maicistrates. and may detine the territorial limits of their sejiaratc and ri'spcctive juris- dictions. (4) III l4('('\VJliiii. — 'I'lie (ioveriior-tieneral in Council may ap- point, hy commission under thi' i^riMt seal, one or m(jri> tit and pro|ier persons as stipendiary magistrates within the district of Kccwatin : ami I'very su(di stipendiaiy manMstrate I'.xercises within the district (d' 'vccwatin. or within such limited portion of the --ame as is prescrilu'd hy the (iovernor-< Jencral in Council, the powi'rs appertaininii: to any justice of the peace, or to any two (1) R. S. Q., Arts. 2490,2491. (2) lb., Art. 2492. (o) R. S. N. S. (1804), c. 12S, as amended and contained in Appendix A, \l. S. N. S. (1884), pp. 15-16. (4) K. S. Man. (1891), c. 93, sec. 2. 18 PHACTICAI. (IflDK Tfi .HAdlSTHATES. juHlict's of tlu' pi'iU'i'. uiidci' any laws or ordiiianeos in t'oi-co from tinu' to tiiiu- in thai district. (1) III ISritiNli <'ollliiihiH. — In l^ritisli ('oiiunl)ia stipoiidiavy luau'lst rail's may Ix' a|i]pointi'd liy tlic liiiMitcnant-dovcrnor in ('ouncil. to ai't as siu'li for any coiuity or cii'ctoral district in llic I'rovincc. or lor any less extensive jurisdiction. (2) Kvery person api^ointed a stipendiary may;istrate in Britisli Columliia must taivi' the oaths of oHice and of alien-iancc within thirty dn\'< from liis a])pointmcnt (uidi'ss such time is extended hy tl\e liicutcnant-liovernor in Council), or his appoiutnu'Ut ahso- lutely ceases and determines. (3) III <li«' Xortli-Wost T«'rrit«»ri<'N. — In the North- West 'rerritories. the Judges of the Sujiri'ine Court id' the territories are vested with all tlu- powers, authority and jurisdiction of stijien- diary mai;ist rati's ; and the (iovernor (ieneral in Council may aj)- ]>oiut ])olice mag'istrati's in the Territories with all the powers of Iwo justices of the jieace under any law in <!aiuida : hut no person can be so appointed unless he has practiced as an advocate, liarris- ter oi- solicitor in Canada for three years, or unless he is a nuigis- trate of three vears standin;;' inCaiuida.. (4) CHAPTER III. TllK I'oWKKS, DlTlKS. A.M> UksPONSIIU I.ITI KS OF ,Ti;STK'j:s 01' TlIK I'KACK and I'oI.K'K .M AlilSTIt.VTES. ]Vaf iiiH' aiiKl <':vt«'iii <»!' Ilicir |»4»n«'rN. — The o-eneral powi'rs of justices of the peace ari' dcrivi'd tVom the commission (d' tlu' peace whi(di is addressed to and assinns the persons therein mimed jointly and severally to keep the peace in a particular (1) R. S. C, c. 53, 8.8. 24, 25. (2) 55 Vic. (13. C), c. 29, sec. 5. (3) 55 Vic. (B. C), c. 29, sec. 9. For the forms of oath of office and alle- giance, gee pp. 12, 13, ante. (4) I{. S. C, o. 60, 8ec. 54 ; "i? it 5S Vic. c. 1 7, sec. 7. I'UWKHS, DITIES AND HESPONSFHI MTIKS. 19 (■(iiiiilv. ilisti'ict. city, til' ](l;ici'. with :ill tlic iiown-s aiid privilcnTs li\- law anil of riyht aii]H'rtaiiiiiii«- to tlif otMcc of Jiistiot,- of t lu' jicaci'. Bosidos tlu' i^i'iu'rai ])o\vt'rs wliidi tlicy (Icrivo from tlic coin- inissioii of tlu' ]K'ac('. — which include all the powers of the ancient conservators of the ))eace. at the common law. to su]tpress riots, to take securities for tlu' ]ieact' and to ap]»rehend and commit criminal ollenders. — there are nuiuy other jiowers and duties, (including;; tl>e holdiny of sj)ocial sessions for the ii-rantini>; of licenses and other special Inisiness). which hy virtue of <>-eneral and local legislation, devolve upon justices (d' t he peace, and in the e.\'iM'cise of whi<di they have sometinu's ci\il as well as criminal jurisdiction. In their civil jurisdit'tion are included cases in whiidi tlieyai't- called upon to ht'ar and determim- complaints hetween nuisters and sei'vants. and claims for assessments, rates, and other matters of a similar nature, under pi-ovmcial Acts and civic and municijial hy-laws. Ihil their most important functions are those whi( h they I'xercise in I'rimimd iiuitteis ; and tlu'se are so exten- sive that, while, as a n-eneral and almost invariahle rule, the case (d'l'very person accused and lu'ought to trial upon an indictment must, in the first instance, luive heen enquired into hcfoi'e a ma<j;is- t rate or a justice of t he ]ieat'c. and have heen hy him sent for t rial, and while, in tlu- general or (puirter .sessions cd' the ])eace. certain .May-ist rates, have (under Article 5;{!l of tlie Code). Jurisdiction. — concurrently with the Su]ierior Courts of criminal jurisdictiou. — to try a i^'rcat many indictahle oflences. and while, moreov r. exclusive jurisdiction is oiven. in some cases to a single jtistice, and. in others, to two justices, to try and determiiu'. in a sunnnary manner, out (d' sessions and without the intervention of a jury, a multitude of ortence- Mhich are not indictahle. and whi(di are punishahle either under the Crinunal Code and other statutes of Canada, or under tiu' statutes of tlu' different ])rovinces. or the hydaws of cities, towns and municijtalilies. they have. also, umli'r sjK'cial coiulitions. the rii^dit to summarily try and (lis|iose of some otleiu'cs whi(di. in the alisi'iu-e of siudi special conditions, are indictahle. It will he readily .seen that the jurisdiction and ]mwers of justices of the peace are in .some cases ancillary to — whilst in others they 20 ritACTICAl, lillhK T(i MAdlM'UATKS. arc suli.-lilulcd tor — tlioso of a siijicrior ti'iliiniiil; ami t lu'ir acts nw c]\]\vy iin'nisterMl ov judicial. In so fai" as llu'ii' acts relate to tlic |ircsci'vatioii of' the peace, tlic |ireliiiiiiiary iiivestiifatioii ot' iii(li<talile otleiici's trialile ■ liy aiiollicr trilmiial. tlie issiiinjf of a suiniuoiis or a warrant, tin- liiiidiiitf over of tlu' [larties to prose- cute or ot' t lie witnesses to ifive evidence, tlie aiiniission of tlu- accused to liaii. or coniniittin.i;: Idni foi' trial, tlu'varc ministerial acts: liui witli rei;'ar<l to olh'nccs ovi'r whiidi they I'xoi'cist' sum- mary jui'isdiction. their acts arc liotii ministerial and judicial : ministerial, in causing' the ott'endcr to he hrouu'ht licforo them, and Judicial, in lu'arinn; and examinini;' the t'videiu'c and in determinini:; till' case; the test of an act heiiiu; minisicrial or judicial liein<f wlu'tlicr tlie justices are entitled to withhold their assent, if they thinU tit. or whether they can he compelled, citlii'r \)\ vinndamus or hy a rule in the nature of a mandamu<. to do the act in (|ucsti(ui. (1 ) Tile Judicial acts of a Justice lu.st lie done witiiin llic territorial limits (d' the district, county or place tor whicli he is aii]»ointO(l ; (2) uiik'ss lie he spcciaiiy iiutiiori/.ed hy statute oi- otiicrwisc to i-xi'r- cisi' his judicial functions I'lsewiierc 'i'lu' judicial acts of a Justice (wlio is not so sjiecially aiithori/ed) are. wiieii done outside of tiie territory tor wiiicii lie is appointed, ahsoiuti'iy null and void. (15) 111 tiie alisence. iiowcvci". of ovidt'iicc to tlic contrary, a ma^'is- trate will \n' presumed tt) lie actiny; witiiin tiie territorial limits of his Jurisdiction. (4; And. witli reijard to acts wiiicii arc nicrolv ministi^riai. tlie ride is tiiat tliey may always lie done iiy a Justice iicyoiid the limits (jf iiis district. (5) (1) /Vr Wifrhtman, J., in Staverton v. Aslibnrton, 1'4 L. J. M. C. 53; 4 El. & B. 5-2(1. (2) R. V. Totness, 18 L. J. M. C. 4(! ; R. v. Stockton, 7 Q. B. 520; R. v. Newton Ferrers, <) Q. B. 32; R. v. Holborn, (i E. & B. 715; 51) L. J. M. C. 110 ; NewbouUl v. C'oltman, 6 Exch. 18!) ; 20 L. J. M. C, 14!), 151, 152. (3) Helier V. Benliurst, Cro. Car. 211; R. v. All Saints, Southampton, 7 B. »fc C. 785 ; Bosan(inet v. Woodford, 5 Q. B. 310; R. v. Hughes, 5 Russ. & Gelil. 194 ; R. V. Beemer, 15 Ont. R. 2()(i. (4) R. V. Fearman, 22 Ont. R. 456. (5) R. V. Slainforth, 11 Q. li. CG; Langwith v. Dawson, .".O U. C. C. R 375. iMiWKKS. I ITIKS AM) U F.SI'i iNSI It 1 1. Ill KS, 21 Tlif |i(i\V('rs n'ivcn to Justices hy stilt life law imisl In- <'.\('rcis((l liy ilifiii ill strict iicconlaiicc with tlic statutes liy wliicli tlic |i(i\vcrs are iijiveii and under wliich tliey act. hi oilier words, tlicii- statu- tory powers iiiiist l>e n-iveii to tliem in exprt-ss terms, and not liy ine)-e mference. At coiMinon law. justices of'tlie jieace have no juris- diction to convict suninuirily in any case, it is not Ipccaiise a statute creates an ottence tliat justices liave power to try it. IMs- tinet loiijislative authority to deal with it suniniavily must lie >i-iveii to them. (1) Hut where, owiny; tti some omission in a statute, the |iowt'r to summarily try and convict is not n'ivt'ii in express \vords. the justici's may still proci'cd. it' from the rest of the statute it imiy lie reasonalily implied that such jurisdiction was intendcil to lie H'iveii to them. Thus, where a statuti' declared that any person <'xposiiiii'. in a piililic place where animals art' commonly exhihited lor sail', any animal infecti'd with a contaifious or infectious dis- ease, siiould he deemed n'uilty of an ott'cnce and he lialde to paA' ii penalty, it was held that, althouifh theri' were no express words making the penalty recoverahh' hy sumnuiry procedure, a juris- diction to deal summarily with oti'enees under tiie statute was imj'liedly confei'red ujion justices. (2) Wiiere tiu' statute pre.serihes any particular justice or descri])- tioii of justice, the justice must lie shown to come within that deseri]>tion. (3) Whcnevei" the concurrence of two or more justici's is ri'(|uisito, the cjeueral rule is that they must he present, acting- together, duvinjif tho whole of the liearinu: :iiid determiiiatiim of tlie ease. (4) And wliere a view is re(iuired to ln' had hy two justices, it should lie i\ joint view. (5) Whei-e more than two justices arc actiu"- (I I Ayard v. Cavendish, Saville, 134; Bross v. Hiiber, IS U. C. (i. B. -JSii; i;. v. Carter. 5 0. R. 651. (!') C alien v. Trimble, L. R., 7 Q. B. 416; 41 L. J. M. C. 1:!l>; .Tolnison v. ( olam, L. K., 10 Q. B. 544 ; 44 L. J. M C. 135 ; Greenw. & M. ]Msg. G., I ; Pal. Sum. Conv., 6 Ed., IS- IS) K. v. Broadlmrst, 32 L. J. M. C. 168. (4) Billings V. I'rinn,2 Bla. Rep. 1017 ; R. v. Arnold. 1 Str. 101. See also snb-sec. 6 of Art. 842 of the Code, post. (5) R. v. Cambridgesh. .1. J., 4 A. & PI 111. 22 I'HArTICAI- uriiiK TH mauisthatks. loifi'tluT Judiciiilly. tlic net dlllic iiiiijority ik'i'idi's ; (1) iiml wlicrc the stiituti' rctrrs tin' niiitltT In iiny luo jiistices. tlicv must lie justices actiiiu; witliiu tlie limits of tlieirjurisdietiiui. (2) Tlie autluu'itv i,'iveh l>y statute to two justices cannot in f^eiioral 1k' exei'cised liy one justiee. (3) Sotliat wlu'i'e a statute riMpiires the conviction of an ott'i'UcK'r to lie licfore two justices, a convic- tion hy one, alt)Uo. is liad. (4) And where an act pi-ovides that tlio prosaeutioii is to l)i' brought heforo any police mai^istrate or before any two Justiees of the jjeaee, it seems tiuit. as ilu' layiiKj of the information is tlie hriiujin<j of the prosecution, it (the layini>- of the information) must l> • done either liL'fore a police nuigistrate or hefore ^u;o justices ; and where in a case suhjeet to sueh a statute, the information was laid before only owe justiee. the eonvietion wa-^ quashed for want of jurisdiction, althonii'li heard and detei-mined by two. (5) Hut whert' the direction in the statute is that the final determination of a thinii; is to be by tiro justices, one of these justices may receive the complaint and grant his warrant to arrest the oH'endev and brin<j liim before the same or any other justiee to tind surety for his appeai'ance at the sessions ; ((3) and if the authority is y-iv^'U to one justice, it may. of course, be exerci.sed by any ^'reater number. (7) A power e.K|iressly o-ivi-n to a justice of the ])eaee to do a par- ticular act cannot be enlarged, by infen'uce. Thus, wlu're the (! (Jeo. '1. c. ;il. gave a single justice authority in bastardy cast's, to take the examination of any unmarried woman if she should charge any person with having gotten her with child, it was held that the statute did not incidentally give the justice jiowev to compel tlu woman to be examined. (S) So. although justices of the |)eaee (1) K. V. Jeflreys, 34 J. P. 727 : 2 1.. T. (N. S.) 78(5. (2) lie reerless, 1 A.I. & Ell 143; 1 Q. B. 143, 153. (3) Dalt. c. (>; 4 Co., 4(i. (4) McGilvery v. Gait, Pugs. & B. (141. (5) R. V. Starkey, 7 M. L. R., 43 ; Aff'. on apjieal, lb., 489. (li) Ware v. Stanstead, 2 Salk., 488; R. v. Simmons, 1 Pugs., loS; See also- Art, 842 of the Co(le,;)o.'i<. (7) Hatton'8 Case, 2 Salk., 477 . R. v. Weale, 5 C. & P., 135. (S) Ex purte Martin, 6 15. & C. 80; d Dowl & Ryl., GO. I'oWKHS. DITIKS AND HKSlMl.N'Snil I, ITI KS. 23 were y;i\t'ii jiirisdict ion. Iiy tlu' (i (Ico. ."{. c. -'). to flctciiiiiiif (lis|Mil('s lictwfcii iiKislci'^ ami servants employed in mamifuctures or traile. it was lu'ld tlial lliisiliil not M;ivc tln'iii jurisdiction to settle dis|)iites lietweeii masters and /lOl/seAoW sei-vants. (1) All tlu* justiees of a district are er|iial in antliority : Init tlic jurisdiction attaclies in any iiarticiilar case to tlie tirsi set id' didy aiitlioi-ized nni^i'ist rates, wlio Inive possession and coi;ni/,aMee id' t lie matter, to the e.Nchision of the s,'|parate jurisdiction of all oi liers ; and tliouctsof any ol liers exce|)t in conjunction witli tlie tir>t are wliolly void. (2) In Ontario, it is expressly ciuicted tliat no justice of the peace shall admit to hail or discduii'i;*^ a prisoner, or adjudicate u|ion or otherwise act in any case for a town or eit\' when' thiu'e is a police man-ist rate, except at the Court of (Jeiu-ral Sessions id' the Peace, or in the case of the illness or aiisence or at the request of the police maifistrati". (15) Hut in the case of justices for a county, in which a town hni>in(j no police ma<j;istrate is situate, their jurisdic- tion over otlences committed in such town is in no way interfereil with, (l) The appointment of a jtolice ma^'ist rate for a county or district ill Ontario may exclude any city or town wiiiidi has a ]iolice iiKiiiist rate ; and. otke.nvise. a police mai^'ist rati' a])pointed for a county or dist rict has jurisdiction in the whole of the countv or district, inclusively of every city or town therein, whether suidi city or town has also a police maii'istratu of its own oi- not : (5) and a jjolice ma,ii,'istrate for a county or part ot' a county niav sit or hold his courts within a town separated from tlie count\' or a city situated within the limits of the county for juilicial purposes, whether such city or town has a police mau'islrate or not. and may, ill siiidi town or city, hear com|(laints and dispose thereof as police niaii,Mst rale ill respect of all matters arising within the countv or (1 ) Kitchen v. Shaw, (i A. & E., 729. iL') H. V. Sainshiirj', 4 T. R. 450. (3) R. S. 0., c. 72, sec. li. (4) //)., sec. 7. (5) R. S. ()., c. 72, sec. 11 ; 50 Vict. (Ont), c. II, sec. 5 I -t I'HACTICAI, (illKK TO M.Xd ISTIIATKS. till' |i;(rl nf I 1h' ciMiiily tor wliicli lie is n|i|ii)iii(c(l. ami do :il! iK'ts. malttTs and lliiiii^s in llic iliscliari^'c of t lie diilics and iiowci's i>\' liis office as I'lillv as wiicn siitinifor lioldinij conrl in anv oilier |>art of the county lor wliicli he is a|i|iointe<l. (I) .hislices of tlx' peace are ex|ii'essly ])roliilMted. in Ontario, from interferini;- wi'li proeei'dinii's liail liefore jiolice nianist rates. (2) Hut iioihinn' is to lie construed to interfere willi tlie Jurisdiction of just ices nf t he peace in cases in which the initiatory proccedinifs ai'c not taken hy the ]ioliee nian-ist rate, nor to prevent ot Ium' justices iVoiii actiiin; with the po|i<'e niai^'istrate at tiie police niai;is- trate's I'lMjuesi. (."!) And. in case of the ah.sence or illiii'ss. or at the reipiest of a police luan-ist rale, any I wo or more justices of t he peact- may act in his place in any matter within the jurisdiction of tlu' police niaii:istrate ; and tiie justices or a majority of them shall, in such case, htive ail the powers whi(di hy any statute arc <fivon In the Jiolice mai;-isl rate ; and any one Justice of I he |n'uce miv so act foi' the police maii'ist rate in casi's in whi(di hy law one justice of till' peace has i.-eiu'rally Jurisdiction in that hciialf. (4) When- ever any Justice of the jieace acts for a police niay:istrate in case of till' hitter's illness or ahsence. or at his ri'(|uest. the \i\n\'\\\\ omnia praesumuntur rite esse acta applies, and the Justice who so acts for u police mairistrate is i»resunied to he properly authorized, uiile.s.stho contrary ajipear. (5) No |ioliee magistrate in Ontario need act in any case arisiii<r outsidi' of the limits of the city, town m- place for which lie is police maii'ist rate, unless he sees tit so to do. (b'_) And. except in eases of urn-eiit necessity, no atteiidaiici' hy him at the police otKco is reipiired on Sundays or ot her holidays or on any day set apart hy the muiiici[)al council as a civic holiday. (7) (1) R. S. 0., c. 7?, see. K! ; oO Vict. (Ont.), c. 11, sec 7. (2) R. S. O., c. 72. sec. 13. (3) R. S. 0., c. 72. sec. 14. (4) Ih., sec. 20. (5) R. V. llodfie, 23 Ont. R., 450. (6) R. S. O.. c. 72, sec. 26. (7) //-., sec. .SO. rNTKUK"*?. ItlAS, (lit I'ATIAI.ITV 25 l»iMqiiiilil> iiiK IiiIoim'mI. ItiaM or l*ai*liiilil,y.— N'n 111111,'isl rail' ami no jiislii'c ol' tin- pcafc lias a i'iy;lil li> act jinliciallv ill any <asi' in ulncli In- liini^clf is a |iarty. nr in w liicli lie lias any iliri'cl ur imlii-.'ct |H'ciiniary intci-csi. Ikiwh'Vit small. The |>laiii |ii'iii(i|i!c 111' justii'c llial no oiii- can lie a jndii'c in liis iiwii causi' pcrvailcs every lirancli ot I lie law. andisasuld as t lie law itsell': ami everv iiroceediii!;,' in i'es|)cet nf wliicli lliis uiticclion exists, is. — illlie (ilijeclion ajilieais upnii llie lace ol' I lie pi'ucced- iiiM-. -alisolnleh xnid : and e\iM'y |iriiceediiii;'. in res|iect iit'wliicli tills nliiccliim exists. ilimiMdi nut a|i|(carin^' n\\ its face, is voiil- al.le. (1 ) Tliere are instaiii'es n|iiin record of man'ist rates bcini;' |iMnislied liy atta(dinicnt for actiny' as Judnjes in matters in wliiidi tiiey tlieniselvt's weri' parties. (2) Wliere a crimnial inforniiitioii was moved for airaiiist a justico of tlie peace who. ii|Mni a complaint made hefore liim. in liis maii'isleria! ca|iacity. Ky his own liailitf. had coiivicle(| and sen- teiici'd to piiiiisiunent a lahorer employed on his ( tho Justice's) own fai'in. for refusiiii; to perfoi-m his woriv accordiiii; to contrai't. tiie Kiiu'lisli Coui't of (Queen's Bench i,n-anted a rule to show cause, and only declined makiiiij the rule ahsojutc. from a consideration that, under all the circumstances, liie stt'jis taUen appeared to proceed from an error in judirment. rather than a had motive : hut at the sanu' time t hoy severely re|)ridiendi'd the conducl of tho man-istrate in sitiiiit;' in jud,i;mont upon a cliary;e in whicii he him- self was to ho considered as the i-eal coni|)lainant. thoun'h in form .the complaint was pri'terrod hy his hailiti'; and they declared tliat it was a most almsive inter|)i'etatioii of the law that a man should presiuiu' to erect liimself into a criminal Judice o\-er the servants on his own farm {'iw an otft'uce aijainsl liimstdf. (.!) (1) Co. T>itt. 141« ; Dimes v. Grand June. Can. Co.,.". H. of L. Cas. 759-785; Cliostor Mercers \ Ironmonjiers Co. v. Bowker, 1 Str. (339. (.■-) Mayor of Hereford's case, per Holt, C. J. 2 Ld. Raym. 76G; 1 Salk. 201 ; 306. (3) R. V. Hoseason, 14 East, 6!i6. -ft I'llACTIlM, iirir>K TH M AiilSTH ATKS. Ma<;iHli'iiii's aiul jiistici's *>{' the |iciii'c jir>' imi unly disiniulitit'il tVitiii ailiiiix JiKlicially in any liisi- in wliich llicy llu'iiisclvcs ari- partits. lull also in any ra^' in wliicli lln-y liav«' any din'tl intcrcsi. Imucvt'i" small; ami I licy slioiild. mori'DVtT. refrain from takiiii;' any part in |iniccciiiiin's in w liidi llicy an- iiulirertlif intcn'sicil ; fur. ajtliou^'li tht'ir coniliu't may Ik- tin* most Inuioralilc. llic fad o|' llicir iu'ini; in any way. (alllioiii;li only imlircd ly ). inlcn'stcd in tlu' mutter at issue. U'uves them opi'n to suspn'ion. (1) It is most esseiitiul for liie satisfactory administration of jnstii'e lliat parties interested in a ileeision sjionid not oidy laUe no paiM in I lie deeision. lull that they slionid avoid i;'i\inii' any t;'ronnd for the lielief that tliey intluenee oiliei's in arrixinLt' at a decision. (2) So jealously have (lie Sujicrior ('onrls rciiarded pi-occed inn's in whicli the ap|ieai'ance of partiality conl<l exist that when one ot' a s,'t of man'istrates who heai'd u case at t he si'ssions was inti'rested in tlie result, tin- I'",nii'lish Court of (Queen's MiMudi (|inished the ordei' made in the ea-e. inasmuch as tin' interested inaifistrato appearc(l to have joined in diseussiui;' the matter wit h t he ol her maii'ist rates, althouii'h there was a majority in favor of the Judy;- ment, without re(d<oninii; ins vote, and althoui;h he withdn'W licfore the other maijistrates rendereil their decision; and the courl would not eiiier into a discus>ion as to the e.xteut of tlu- ilitlueue ' e.\er<'ised iiy t he intel'este(| party. (.J) I'lven where an interested luaii'istrate had decided (/(/(j/nsMus own interest it was held, nevertheless, that in cases where tlu-y are directly or indirectly interested. maij;ist ratesshonid not intertei'i'.( t) In another case three ma.i^ist I'ates. who were inlcresteil in tin' matter at issue, joined eii^ht otiu'r nia.i^ist rates in the proceedin<;s in a cast' taki'n under an Ael wiiicdi took away, in e.xpi'ess ti-rms. (1) Anon., I Sulk. :!!•(! ; H. v. Yarlpole, 4 T. R. 71 ; K. v. Gt. Yarmouth, tl B. & C, G46 ; K. v. Risliton, 1 Q. B. 47!) (w). (2) U. V. Suffolk, ,1. J., I'l L. J. M. V. 1()9; 18 (l B. 410. And see R. v. Hereford, J. .1., •_' D. &. L. 500; and R. v. O'Grady, 7 Cox C. C. 247. (3) R. V. Hertfordsliire. J. J., 6 Q. B 75;1; 14 L. ,i. M. ('. 7".. (4) R. V. Gudridge, 5 B. i^c C. 459. INTKKKST. IIIAS. nil I' \ 1111 \ I. ITV. 27 ill.' ri:;'lil Dit'erti'iruri. I'imhi an ii|»|«li<'iili'iii l.riiiii' iiiiidr tnr;i \\v\l ,,\' I'.rti'iniri \\ was rcsisti'il. llu'rcrnrc. "u ilic irrniiinl^ l.lliat lln- wi-il ll^(•c/*^■or(^r^■ \viis'c.\|iri'>sly liiUi'ii away lpy llic Ad. aml.li. Iliat lllc lircsclirc nl' tlic llllTf illhTi'sU'il Justices iliil lii>l allfi't llic .Iccisimi. as llic result woiiM liave lieeii the same had they l)eeii al.selll. |{llt l-nni Deliliiail. ('..I., said. •The ehlll-e wliich laUes a\\a\- I lie certiorari (h)es not iireciiuh' <>iir exereisiiiu; a sii|ieriiiteiid .•iH-e (i\cr liie pvueeediiiu-s so I'ar as tn see Jiisjiee executed, .\iiil liere 1 am (dearlv nf >i|iiniiiii liiat justice has iml heeii eNcciited. It i- clear liial. dm tlie sei'dlid day. lliree man'ist rates who were inter- ested took a |iarl in tiie ijecisioii. It is eiioiiii'li to siiow tliat this decision was joliowed ly an order; and I will not eni|iiire wliat the imi'ticuhir (|uestion was. nor liow llie majority was made up. nor wlial the resnll would lia\e lieeii it' the inlerested imiiiist rates iiad retire(|. The court was im|iro|ierly con^liiuled. and that rendered the decision invalid." (I) It has heeii iield that where a iimirislrate siuino' on a ca-e was called as a witness, this did not dis(|ualiiy him iVom t'lirt her actiuii' in the case. {'!) .\nd a mau'istrale is not di.s(|iialitie(l IVom sittiiii;' in a ease hecaiis' he has heeii suli|i(en!ied and i-- lo he called as a witness at iIk- hearini;'. (."!) Any pi'cuniary interest, howi-ver siii^^lit. and even allliouu'li it may In' indirect, will as a rule dis(|iiality a inai,'ist rate from lakiiiii: jiarl in tiie <le(isi(ni of the case. Thus, where a deleiidiiiit was convicted ot' a hreatdi of a miiiiiciiial hy-law. in haxiiii:; made an auction sale without license, ami two of the convicliny' Justices, who were licensed auctioneers. p('rsiste(l in sittinj.^- after heini; oliiecled to as iiv'iiii;'. on that aciiuinl. interested, it was held that they were dis(|iiaiified ; and the coii\ietion was. on that y'roiiiid. i|ua^hei| witli costs a li'ai list tlu'in. (1) 'I'he interest, in onler lo he a dis((ualifyiiiy one. need not he a pecuniary one. hut. if not peciiiiiarv, it must he siihsiantial. The mere poasihiliti/ (d' hias in favor of one of the parties (h)es not ij)io (1) H. V. Cheltenham Commrs., 1 Ad. it K. (N. S.) 4(i7; 10 L. J. M. C. 9!». CJ) R. V. Spn.nle, 14 Out. 1{. 875. (H) H. v. Farrant, L'd q. I). I). 5S. See aho R. v. Tooke, ".I W. R. 753. (4) K. V. Clmpuian, 1 Out. 1!. ."82. 2S I'HACTICAl, (il IllK, TO MAOIS'l'UATKS. f-icto iwo]!] llu' Justice's (Iccisiou. In oi'dci' to liaxc tliat cll'cct tlu^ bias mii'^t licsliowii at least to Ke real ; and it' a iiiai;'ist rate liassiicli a siilisiantial interest — whether pecuniary or not — as to nial<e it liUeiy t'oi' liiui to luivi' a rt'al liias in l!u' matter, he slH)uhl not onlv taUc no ]iart iu tlu' (h'cision whicli would render it void, hut sluuild entirely withdraw diirin;;' the whoU-ease. ( 1 ) Where, for instance, a jusiiie was a nu'Uilter of a di\isi<Mi of ilie Son> ot' 'l'eni|(ei'auee whicli carried on a |)roseculion for selling' li(|Uor. he was iiehl in- coiu)ieli'nt to try the case, and a eonxiction ohtained hefore him was held 1)H(1. (2) And. where, at a vest i-y meeliui;- held to con- sider the ohst ruction of a hii;'hway. the re>olntion. direeiiui;' that the otleuder he called u]iou to remove tlu' (dist ruction, was the r.'snlt td' a nu)lion nuide hy a justice of the peace who afterwards sat. and. witli aiH>tlu'r justice, adjudicated upon the hearinn- of a case taken ay'aiust the olfender for lunini;' deposited the ohstiaic- tiou and tor having' failed to remo\'e it after heiuii- notitii'd to do so. it was hehl that tlie justice wiio had moved the rt'solution was (lisqualitied from adjiKlieatiuii' upon the case, hecaus;' the fact of his haviiiii' moved t he resolution afforded u'round for a reasonahle sus]iicion of huis oil his part, althonnh there iiiii;ht not ha\'e heeii any liias in fact, (yi) 111 ])ursuaiice of a resolution, jiassed hy tin- town council of W., to take steps to remove a nuisance, a summons was issued aii'aiust the owner «d' t he premises on wlii(di the nuisance existed, and at the lieariiig an order was made for the ahateiiieiit of the nuisance. Two ot' tiie justiei's who sat in tlie case wi-ri- iiiemhers of the town council when the rt'solutioii was passed ; and it .was held that they iiad siudi an intert'st as niii;'lit n'ive tlu'iii a Mas in the matti'r. and that theyouii-ht not, to liavt' sat as justices upon t he heariiiii,' of I he suniUKUis. (4) Where a uumlier of persons were associated tou'etherto aid iui'u- foveinuMlie Canada Temperance Act, audoueof tliem. X.. with money (1) R. V. Myers, L.R., 1 Q.B.D., 173; 34 L.T.N.S. 1'47 : R. v. Hand, 35 L. J. M.C. 157; L.R.I Q.B. 230. (2) R. V. Simiiioiis, 1 Pugs. loO. (3) R. V. Gaisford, L.R., 1 (l-B., :W1. (4) R. V. Milledue, L.R., 4 (i.B.D. 332. INTKHKST. litAS. (lit I'AUTrAMTV. 29 lnnii>lic(l li\- jiiiiitlicr lit' tlicm. purclKiscil li(|uor in i)i-(1»t Id iiiaiii- liiiii a pfdsi'cution, ami liu' iiii'oriiial ion was laid at llic i'i'((ut'st of (iliici- iiu'iiilior?* of llu' association wlio fnrnislicil nioncy for carry- iiiH" on liu' [n'oi-i'dlinii-s. ami <in the cviilcnci- of X.. who was a cnnsin of llif justice who iricil i he case, tlie detendant was con- victed, it was held that the justice was not inconi]HMeul to try the case. ( 1 ) Where, duriuii; the heariui;' of an appeal from a refusal to u'rant a license, one of the justices who haii I'etused the license was pi'cs- ent on the liencii. and conversed with some of tiie ina<i:istrates who were lieariuii' the a])iieal. on some nnitler unconnected witii the a]ppeal. it was hehl that. hciuLC ju'cscut. he formed part of the coui't. and that. alllioui;-li in reality he did not act in the heariui; or deteriniuatiou id' the apjieal. the order of the Sessions was invalid. (2) .\l the sumuniry trial of a d(d'eudant for an otfence aii-ainst the Liipior Ijceuse .\ct. the hench at whicdi the inau'isi rates sat con- sisted of a desk on a rais.'d jilat foi'm. at t he end of i he court i-o(uii, and on this platform, some four fe.'t \'v(i\\\ the desk, tlu'i-e was a chair for the use of tin- constahle, hnrin<i' the trial a liecnst' com- missioner, who was also a justice of the |ieace. went from tlie counsers tahU'. where he had heen sitting, and sat in the cou- stahle's chair on the ]datform. There was no I'vidence that lie in any way improperly inlei'fered in the triid : and it was held that i under the circumstances he could not he dei'mcd to ha\e heen sit- ting;- (HI the hem-h and taking' part in the trial. (I!) Where ])rost'cutions for otfences ay'ainst \\\i' Canada Temperance lyl('M\ei'(.' taken hefore nniii'ist rates who were notoriously •■ thoronyh- jgoiiig Scott Act men. " it was alle^'cd that these man'ist rates had Baiil tluit in no case (f conviction wotdil they inflict a less line t inm J.ilf and that one of tliem was. moreover, a memln'r of a local com- linittee for takiiii!; jirosecntions under the Act; hut it transiiiiod that he had. hefore llu' .\ct came into oju'ration in the c(Mintv resiii'ueil fi'iun the commiltee: and i( was held hv the court that there was no disipialifyinn' interest In ihe may;ist rates, nor any (1) Ex parte Cirieves, 29 S.C". N.B. 543. •2) K. V. Snrrpy, .1. J., 1 Jnr. N. S. li;!8 ; 21 L. J. M. C, 1<)5. (3) R. v. Southwick, 12 ('. L, T. 173. 30 I'UACTICAI, (illDK Til MAli I STKATKS. rciil iM' suli>laiili:il liias all rilmtalilf ti> lliciii. nor any reason wliy I licy slioiiM not law't'ully adjuilicatc in the case. (1) 'J'lu- tiU'l tliat a jiistiee of tlie jK'ace is a i'aU'|iayer ]ieciiniariiy intei'esteil in tiie I'esull (j|' a ease may <lis(|uality iiiin from takiiiii' |iurl ill liie lieai'iiii;' of it. (2) Sometimes, liowever. a Justice ot t lie peace is e.\|n'cssly em|iowereii to act . ail iioiiy'li inlei'csted to some extent in llie I'esult of a decision. Foi' instance, tiie Imperial statute. Id (ieo. II.. c. IS. sec. 1. pvoxiiU's tliat justices of tlie peace may enforce tlic law as to rates made in any parisli witiiin tiieir jurisdiction, altiiouyh tiiey tlieinsei\-es are cliaryealije to rates made in the sami' parisli ; and in a casi' inxolviui;- a lull considi'ration of the )n'ovisions of that statute and id' the Union Assesaiiient Commit- tee Amnuimtnt Art. ]S(i4. (."i) it was ri'cciitiy held (hccemlier. 1S!I;{). liy the I'lnulish Court of A)ipeais. that, under tlu-se Acts, a justice of the peaci- is not dis(pialilie(l frimi actiiiii'. at Special Sessnins. in the determination (d'a ratiiii;' ap]ieal l>y reason of his heiii<;- a rate- payer in the parish in whiih the rate appealed ayaiiist was made. (4) In like manni'r llu' ]ioli(H' iiiaii'ist rate of Si.,Iohn. New l>rui wick, is not dis(|iuditii'd from trying' offenci's aii'ainst the Li(|iio license Act hy reason (d' liis hciiiu' ;i ratepayi'r. there iK-iiiii,- a local statute prexentiiiii' such dis(|nalilicat ion. (5) l>elatiotishi|i may he a i;'round id' dis(|ualilication. Thus, in a case of assault, where t he complainant was the daiiii'li lei'id' the con\ictinn' mai;'isl rait', tlii' conviction was (|uashcd. ((1' \\\i\. in a prosecution, fo; cruelty to aninnils. taken ay;ainst the father of the (diildreii who ,\cie alle^'cd to ha\e comiidtled the acts complained of. the justice was the father of the eoni]ilaiiiani ^ and. on tiiis i>-round. the eon\ictioii was i|uaslu'd. (l) (1) K. V. Klemp, 10 Ont. R. 14;). ii,c nhn R. v. Eli., In 0\\\. R. 7l'7. (2) R. V. GaiNford, L. R., 1 Q. B. 381. [Z] L'T and -'S Vict. (Imp.), c ".U. (4) T^.c ;)aWc Workiii^tton Overseera, 5) R. (Feb. 1894). Fullnuivg, R. \. Boliiifibroke, 5 R. 5'M; 02 L. .1. M. C. ISO; Oi) L. T. 717; imil R. v. Esses. J..I..ri M. its. r.i.s. (5) Ex parte Driscoll, 27 S. C. N. B. 210. ((i) R. V. Lantrford, L") Ont. R. 52. (7) R. V. Holtnan, ;i Riiss. & C'lies. 375. is- r INTKKKSr. )!1AS. (I U I'A KTI Al, I T V 31 A mai;is(riitc was lu-ld lo Ik' (lis(nialili*'<l in a casi' in wliicli tin- (li'lrmlant. Iicrscit'. was tiic widow nt' tlu- niaii;isl rate's (li'ci"ast'<l sou. (1 ) liiit wiii'i'c (111' iji'lrnilant was the husfiand of llic widow of tiic nian'istrati's (U'coasi'd son. it was licld tiiat t lie luaijist rati' wa> not dis(nialiH('d. (2) A iiiaiiiM rate wliosi' n'randfatlu'r is a iirothcrof tlu' drfcndant's '^wn\ n'l'aiidniotlu'r is inconiiR'ti'nt under the Canada Temj erance Art. (.',) Wiicrr. on appeal from eouxiriions liy four jiisiiees in se\eral cases of assault arising' out of tiie same nuitter, it ap])ear,'d tlutt oneof tlu' four justices was a tirsi cousin ot' tiu' principal rcspiuid- cnt.ami that llie other ri'si)on(K'nts. tlioundi not rciated to any of tile justiees. Were, at the time of the allcn'cd assault. scr\'ants of itiic i)rincipal rcspondent.it was luld that no distiuction could he liiuulc hetween the case ot the principal rcs|)undent and the cases lof liis sei'vants. and that all the convictions must Ik* set aside. (4) Where it appeared that at the time of a trial hcfori' a I'arish iCourt ( 'ommis>iouer. the plaintiff in the case was a servant ol' tlu- connnissioner. it was liehl. upon a rt'view of tlu' conuuissiouer s deci>ion. that it was improper for liim to act wInU' under such relatious with the jilaintilf; ami a nou-suit was ordered. (.")) I'nder the Trades Union Act. a master and tiu' father, sou or lu'otlier of a masti'r in the particulai' t rade or husiiie.ss. iu or in con- nection witii wiiieh any olfeiiee under tlu' Act is cluirL^'ed to iuivc lieen coiundtted. arc respectively disinuditied from actiui;,' as a jus- lice of llu' peace, or as a memhcr of any court heariny; an\' aiM'cal undei' the Act. ((]) There is a similar provision coutained in the Act relatiuu' to threats and intimidations. ( 7) In ()iitario no police maiiMstrate and no partner or clerk of an\' (1) E.r parte W-.MM-e, L'7 S. C. N. B. 174. (2) Ex part,' WalliU'o, '.'(i S. C. N. B. 593. (3) A'.r parlt Jonos, '11 hi. C. N. B. r)o2. (4) Caiupbell v. McDoniikl, 1 W E. 1. 423. (o) Gallant v. Youiik, 11 C. 1.. T. 217, 218. (tn H.S.C.c. 131,8. 21. (7) U. y. C, c. 17;i, sec. 12,8.8.5. I'KACTICAI, (M IliK I'd .MAdlSTHATES. |iiilicf miiii'isl rate can acl as an'cnl. sdlicitor or counsel in any case. iiialU'v. prnsi'ditini: oi' |iv(icc('(linii- of a crniiinal nature; nor can tsiU'h ]>()lici' niaii'istrate. partner kv eiei'l< ait as afort'said in any case -wliicli liy law may \iv investiii'ated or tried lietuve a nnin'ist I'ato or justice of the peace. ( I ) 'I'iie |iriipcr course to lie pursni'd. in i)Vi\vv \i) preoent a nni^istrale tVoiu actinn' in and adjndicatiui;' u|M)n a case in wliicli he is iuter- esii'd, is to apply lor a writ id' projiiliition. (2) Bui. when tliis course liy proliiliition is not a<lo|iled. and the intevesti'd magis- trate ii'oi's on with and adjudicates upon ihe case, llie ohjt'ction of interest may he used as a i;round n\' error t<i attack and set aside his jndii'nu'nt. (i!) The uiijection that a ma,u;isti'ate or a justice is di.stiualitied. hy inlevr.M. from sittini;; in and adjudicaliiin' uj)Oii a case may he waived : .'ind. therefore, tlu' ohji-ction siiould Ite raised In-fore tiie e\idi'nce is taUen : for if a jiarty. knouiui;' of tlu' inli'rest. <lo not raise the ohjeotion, hut i;<) on with tli/ casi-. and take the chance of a (h'cision in Ins fa\(n'. there will lie a waivi'r ol'the olijectioii of interest, and the jn'oceedings will not he void on the yrouiid of (sutdi interest. (4) lint the ohjection is not waived liy reason of its not lieinti; lalcen at the lieariny. unless the jiai'ty entitU'd to take the ohjection was then aware of the judu'e's interest. ( .")) €>iinI«'i* **V 1Ii«' Mil miliary .liiriMilioiiiiii itt tTiiK- ti<'<'H. — Whenewr jiniperty or title i> in ([uestion oi' there is a hi'ma fide claim of Ici^'al riyht to do tin' act complained of. justices are ousted of their jurisdiction to hear and determine in a summary manner, and their hands art' lii'd from interfei'iui;'. althouii;h the (1) R. S. O, r. 72, sec. 27. (2) Hutton V. Fow ke, 1 Keb. 64S ; Anon., 1 Salk. 330. (3) l'(r Baron I'arke, in Dimes v. Urand Junt'tion ('anal Co., 3 H. of L. Ca?. 7.59-785. (4) R. V. ClieUenham Comnirs. 10 L. .1. M. C. 911; R. v. Riahton, 1 Q. !!• 47il; R. V. Allen, nil L. .1. IM. C. !i8 ; Wakefield v. West Ridlntt k Grimsby Ry., 3") 1 . J. M. C. 09; R. v. Stone, L'3 Ont. R. 4G ; Turner & anor. v. Post- master-Gen., 34 L. J. M. ('. 10; Ex parte Barbere, 12 C. L. T. 449. (5) R. V. Recorder of Cambridfi;e, s El. ct Bl. 037; 27 L. J. M. C. 160; K. V. Warwickshire Sheritf, 24 L. T. 211. Ml STKH <>K Si;M.\rARV .11 KISDrCTION. 33 \\\vl> lie silcli ;l^ lIli'V t it IliTwisc liavr illlt lliil'it V to tilUc ru^ui/.aiict) of. (1) ■ • ' Tills jii'liuliilf is not f'ouiiilcd iii)on any k-ijlslativo provHioh. i.ut is a (|ualiticatioii wliicli the law itself raises in iho execution of penal statutes, and it is always implied in tlieii- consti'uetion. (2) It is sonieliines. also, the sulijeet of special statutory cnaclnient. {•'(U' instance, tlu' ('ode provides that no Justice shall hi-ar and detennine luiy case of assault or liattery in which any c[uestioii arises as to tiie title to any lands, hereditaments, or any interost therein or accruinii' iherolVom. or a- to any hatdcruptcy or insol- ! vet icy. or any execution under t he process of an_\" court of justice, f;!) 11* The jurisdiction of a justiei' is not to he ousted, however. Ip\- an\' ii\>-n- /ircJence o\' tith-. (4) or even hy a buna fide claim of a li^dit wlii(di cannot, in law. exist. (5) There niu>t he some color for the claim (d' title, ((i) And it is for t he justices to determine, from ;dl the facts and circumstanci's ^'Hi.of the case, whether a claim of I'iii'ht. when juit forward, is madi^ bona fuk and with a showof i-i'a.son. (7) Jf they determine that it i.s not so made.it is their iluty to pi-oceed witii and decide the case, (8) Still, if t he grounds u|!oii wliicii Justices decide an-ainst the fairness and rt'asonahleness of a claim of rindit he iiisutticient. the court will review their iletermiuation and ovi'rrule it. (!l) If the justices I.elieve that there is a 6o/(a _/7Vfi question of title they have no jurisdiction. (10) And, even when the juatti'r is (1) Paley, 4 E.l. 41; R. v. Cridland, 7 E. & B. Ho?,\ '21 L. J. M. C. 28 ; iinjrstoik v. Raynor, -Ifi J. P. 240; Watkins v. Major, 44 ].. J. M. ( . 164; Denny v. Tiiwaiie.s. 4(i L. J. M. C. 141. (2) l'alov,4 !•:,]. 117. (.'!) (ode, Art. 842, sub sec. .S, po.s«. (4 I H. v. Wrott»8ley, 1 B. & Aid. 048 ; R. v. Speed, 1 Ld. Raym. r..s3 ; R. v. Biirnahy 2 l.d. Hiiyni. 9ii0; Kinnersley v. Orpe., Doug. 41)9. (•">) Simpson v. Wells, 41 L. .1. M. C. ln5 ; llargreaves v. Diddams, 44 L. .1. M. C. 1 7.S. {()) Roes V. Davies, 8 C. B. N. s. ,-,0. (7) K. v. Dodson, !) Ad. & El. 704. (8) R. V. Mussett, 26 L. T- N. S. 427. (i>) R. V. Dodson, »vpra; Paley v. Birch, 1(1 L. T. N. S. 410. (10) I.egg V. Pardee, !» ('. B. N. S. 28'J. 34 I'HACTICAI, (il nil', I'll MAiilSTItATKS. <l(nilit fill, il Will lie rn<)U<j;li In stop tlicir |)rocci'(l i luff's ; itiiil tlu-y viiniiot i>,i\(' llicmschi's jurisdictiiiii liy a false (Iccisioii. (1) rpoii an iiitorinatidii I'nr •• iiiilawt'iilly and williilly" lishini!: in a nun-navii^'aiilc river, tlie |ii'i\iile pniperty dC anollier. a claim of i'iy;ht, liy I he defendant as one of tlie piililie. to tisli in tiie river was lield not to oust tlie jnstiei's id' inrisdietinn. as siudi a I'iii'lil eonid not [lossiMy lie aeiiuired. and tlu' bona fide lielief of t lie dcdeiidant that he had tlie riiiht to lisli \' unld not |ire\ent his lieiiiii' coiiNicted. a n'nilty mind not lieini;- an essential ingredient to constitute t he otVeuee. (2) NVhere. in an action of trespass t<> land, tried hefore a justice of the peace, the defendant set u|i a title, and otlered a deed in evidence, and the plaintitV also jirodnced evidence of deeds au<l of a lilh' arising' li\' csto|>pe|. on w lii( h t he just i<-es undei'ioid< to decide. it was held tiiat the title was bi'ma fide in (|nestion. and that the justice's jui'isdict ion was ousted. (."I) Where in a prosecution for an injury, amountiiiii' to twi-uty-five cents, doll" to o-rowinn- t rees. the defendant si-i up and proved a binui fidi claim of title, the ( 'ourt held that t lie jurisdiction of I he justice W;is ousted. (4) And wiiere a defendant was convicted under a statute which |)rovided that iiothiiiy; therein contained slioidd e.xti'iid to any case in \\lii(di the jiai'tx' acted under a fair and reasonalilc supposition I hat he had a ri^dit to ilo i he act complained of. and it appeared liy the e\ideiice adduced hcfoiH' the mau'lst rate. that there was a disjiute lietwcen the parties as to the ownership, it was held that a title to land came in (|tiestion. and that the defendant was imiirojierly convicted. e\cii thonydi the mauisti'ate did not helieve that the defendant had a title. (5) I'poii a idiai'ii'c of t resjiass upon a lishery. the defendants, who claimed a i'ii;lil to tisli tiu'rein. jiroduced evidt-'uci- of lon^,' usi'i- and ottered security tor costs in case the comjilaiuant would institute a (1) R. v. Nuunely, E. B. & E. 852; '-'7 L. J. M. C. 2(J0; K. v. SlimiisoD, :\2 L. .]. M. C. lW. (L') Hudson V. :Macrao, ;!:^ L. J. M. C. C") ; 9 L. T. N. S. GTS. (:j) R. V. Harshiiiiui, 1 Pups. [U6. (4) R. v. O'Brien, 5 Q. I-. R. 1(11. (5) R. V. J)avidson, ^5 U. C. (l B. 91. IIISTKK OK Sr.M.MAHY .llHISlUCTIn.V, 35 civil uclinii ; and it was iicld tlml lliis was siicli a bona fide claiiii nf title tlial llir jiii'iMliclioii cifliic inan-isl I'atc:- was oiisd-d. (1) Wlicii. ill order to constitute an otlcnce a mens rea oi- crimiiial intention must lie shown, an lioiiest claim of I'iudit will avoid a Mimmarv conviction ; Imt. wliere tlic aiisencc of a cfiminal intent is not iiecessai'ily a defence, the piivty settinii,' iij) the claim of rin'lit must show soiiu' eTound for its assertion, and if he fails to do so he is lialile to he convicted of the otVt'iice (diaru'cil. (2) S. owned a lot of land in X. in iStii; he sold the west lialf of it to the comiilainant. reservinii;. howe\er. a strip of t iiirty feet along tlie mu'tli line tiicreof. as a road, for himself and successors in title. to and from the east half of t he lot. S. put uji a nale at tlic west limit of the land, when' it met tiu' hiiidiwav. which i;-ate remained there from iSlKi until it was removed hy tlie ih'feiidants. who wi'i'c the siu'cessors in title to S. The defemlunts vi'inoved the u'ate in (piestion as an olistrnction : and they were convicted on a (diary'e |f of lia\'inn' nnlawfiiUy and maliciously hrokeii and destroyed tiio yate as the iiroperty of the com|ilainant . Held, that in claiminii' a riii'lil to remove the i^'ate the did'endants were acting' in ^'ood faith and under a fair and ivasonahle supposition of riii'iit todotiie act complaiiu'd id': and tlie conviction was tiierefore ipiashed. Held, also, that the (piestion cd' fair and reasonalile supposition of riyht to do the act (■om|)lained ot was a fact to he determined hy the justice, and his decisictn upon a matt(.'r of fact would not. as a nth', he reviewed ; hut t his rule did not iijiply where, as here, all t he facts showed that the matter or (diar^H' itself was one in wliiidi smdi r.'ascmalile supjiosition existed ; that is. where the case and the e\-iilenee were all one way. and in favor of the defendants. (."J) OiK'Ovide l.acoiirsiere. on lieiiiy; (diari;'ed with reei'iviiiy- a hed- stead. k'uowiiii;' it to he stolen, claimed to he tlic owner of it. hut. hciiiy summarily tried and convietiMl. he sii;Mied. in consideration of not lieiiiii' sent to li'aol. a written aiii'>'*'nieiit providiiiii- for his dis- ciiarn'e from conviction oii restorim;- the iK'dstead. and on pavinji- the costs and S.")ll daiiiaycs to the jirosecutor within Hfteeii days. (1) li. v. Magistrate, Bally Castle, 9 L T. R., N. S. 88, (:.') Watkin.-! v. Major, L. K. lli C. P. (i(i2 ; .'53 L. T. l\., N. S, .3.")2. (.'!) i;. V. .McDonaki, VI O. \l. 381. 36 rit\( TICAl. Ill IDK T.I MA(i|STI!ATKS. lu' iiUii anTcciiin' llial tlu'i'c sliniilil lu' im jiplK'iil i>r |ir(i(ri'(liii<;-.s ai^iiinst I lie ciHiNicliiiii. I'|i(iii itn ii|i|ilicaiii>ii t<>r ii rcrttorari. llic I'oiirl lo()l<i'i! l<i t lie cxiik'iicc In sec if it criiniiial hIIcik'c whs coni- luiltcd. and it was licld thai tlicrc was a Iudki ji'/e claiiu ol' title wiiicli sliiiiilil iiavc inis!i'(l liic justices' Jiirisdict inn, thai the writ- ten iijureeineiil was wiilionl \aliil consideratinn and entirely ille- iral and voi<l. and tluit llie action ni' tlie justices was an almse of the |)i'ocess |irovided liy tlie ei'iniinal law. (1) 'I'lie acts of a jiersou's servants under his H-ui<lance in assert in li; a riifiit would uoi I'cnder tlicni liaMe to conviction, if the master himself lie not so liahle. (2) .Mthoiiifh. as a ride, justices iiave no power to eu(|nire into a ease iiivolviim; u ([uestion of iitle to real |)ro|K'rty. yet when the title is itself the ([Uestion wldtdi thiy havi' to tlecide. or of thi' very essi'iiee of the en(|uiry lud'ori' them, their jurisdiction remains. (,'{) .\nd the juris(|i(ti(Mi of justices is not ousted in cases in whicdi the\' lia\e ))ower l>y statute to <lelermini' the rin'lit to which the (daim is made. (4) l*4»tv('i* to .llaiiiiaiiii IIimIoi* aiii«t to 4'<»iiiiiiif Vur €'4»iil('iii|»l. — 'I'here are some few ca.se.s — tornduii'. as it wei'e. an exct'jition to the ifeiK'i'al ruK' — in whiidi. from neci'ssiiy and from the special nature of the occasion, a jiavty altlmiiii'li interested is allowed to aiijudicate. it lieini;' considered a less (■\ii that he should do so than that there shoidd he an entire failure of Justiei'. '^herl^ are cases in whicdi cii'ciimstances of su(di a iduiractt,'!' arise that* it liecomes the \infort uiiate duty of the court to act as hoth jtarty ;ind judye. (5) j-'or instance, justices ot' t he jieace. acting' judicially in au_\' i-ase in whicdi they have the riydit to tine and imprison, are Jiidii'cs of rccorcl. with jiower to maintain order, and to orally ami (1) K. V. Lacoiirsiere, 12 C L. T., 3;!4. 4//. in appeal, S \' an. L. U. :]02. (!') li. V. Thexion. '.'S .1. P. 323; J'.irnie v. Marshall, 35 L. T. 373; 41 .I.P. 22 (3) U. V. Llaiitillo (I'.recknockshire), J. ,1.. 15 1.. T. N. S. 277; 31 J. P. 7 ; William.s v. Adams, 31 ].. J. !\I. C. lO'.i. (4) K. V. Young, 52 L. .1. M. ( '. 55- (5) Per Lord Denman, C. .1., Wilson's Case, 7Q. P.. lOlo; Dime's Case, 12 Beav. (i3; 14 g. P.. 554. .MAI .VIA I MM I nItliKH. 37 'Aitliniil wiiiTiiiil (iiiniiiil pciv-niis to prison for conlciniil (■oinmiltcd ill tilc liicc of 1 lie couiM. ( 1) I'mlcf .\rti<'l(' oS.") of llu'('oiir. wiiicli liiis rt'fcrciicc |o lln' in'c- liiiiiiiiif\' (•.Xiiiiiiuiitioii of persons cliiiryi'il \vitli indicliiipli' otlfiiccs. llic in\u'stin'iilin,n' nnii^ist rule Inis tlic power \<y Marriint to eoniinit for eonleinpt any )ierson. wiio liaviiii;' iijipeiireil niider <iilipo'iia or iieiiii;- otiierwise present, refnses to ije sworn or to answer sneii iiuestions as are pnt to him. or ri'fnses to pnxlnee any (loeiiineiits oi' to siii,-n liis (K'position. And Artiele ilOS (d' tlie Code expressly provides that ever\' jndii'e of sessions of t lie jieaee. (diairiiiaii id' the eonri of (leiieral Sessions of the ])eaee. ]>oiiee man'ist rate, distriet nnii^'ist rate or slijiendiary nia^'istrate sliall liave sncdi and liie iii<e powers and autliority to presi'i've oivU'r in tlie said coni'ts diiriiii;" I tlie hoi<liiii;' there(d' ami liy the iiUe ways and means a-^ now hy law are or may he e.\ereised and used in like eases and for the like purposes iiy any court in Canada, or hy the indices thereof durini;' the sitting's thereof. .\ecordiny. however, to a recent Ontario decision, (conlirini'd in appeal) the powers n'ivi'i I hy ,\rticie '.Ids of the Code are not exer- eisahie iiy a sin^-h' justici' of tlu^ peace, in this case a lawyer ■while acting' as counsel for the <lefeiice in a suimnary trial 1k'- fore a Justice of the peace was arri'sicd hy order (d' tin- Jiistict' and. without any formal adjudication or warrant, excluded from the court and imiirisoned. for an allcii'i-d conti'iii|il and disoj'- (lerly conduct hefore the court ; and. in an action foi- assault and false arrest and imprisonment an'ainst the Justice of tlu' peace and a.ijfainst the conslahle \\ho made tlii' arrest upon the Justice's order. it was held that the Justice' had no jiowt'i" to summarily punish for a contem|il committed in the fact' of the court, at any ratV not Avithout a ftu'inal adjudication an<l a warrant settiiii;' out the con- tempt in (piestion ; hut it was held that a Justice has the rin'ht to B remove iicr.sons who hy ihi'ir disoi-dei-ly conduct oiislruct or inter- i fere with the hiisine.ss of the court ; and it was also held that the ' propi-r exercise of the priviley;e (d' counsel in examiuiiiii; witnesses (hK's not constitute an interruption of the proci'i'diiiii's so as to warrant his excdusion : hut. that, if tiu' justice in this case had (1) .Armstrong v. ^h (•'affrey, 1 Ilannay, 517. And .ve U. v. Siott, 2 U. C L. .J.N. S. 82:). ',\8 I'llACTICAI. Ill IDK T." M A(l I STH ATKS, issued Ills wiiiTiiiit I'lir llic ((111111111 Micnt <if llic |iliiiiilil1' tor tlic ulk'lii'il i()iil('lii|i| , illid liiid stilled lliereill sllrtieieiit i^roilllds tor siic'li edimiiiliiieiit. llie e(Hirt would not liiivi' revii'wed t lie facts tliei-eiii iilK'!j:e(l ; liiit tliiit iis lliere was no warrant oC (•oniniit inenl, tlie ju-liee Wiis lioiind to estalilish sueli fuels as would iiistifv the eolll'se lie li;ld lilkell. (!) Tliere seems to lie no doiilil lliiit justices, while ;icliiii;- in t lie ))evtoniiance of their judicial duties, lia\(' the jiowit id |>ro|ecl themselves from shinder and almse. And if a |>erson ( hai'ii'es a iiia^i>t rate to his face or in his |iresi'nce with a<Miiiii' corru|itiy or |iartially. the iiKiL;'istrale may. if this lie said while he is acting' judicially, fort iiwit h commit the oll'eiider, jtrovided su(di conmiit- nieiit he made out in writing- and he duly sii;-iied. (2) It iinist. however, he a commitment tor a time certain: and. therefore, a cominiimeiit until the clef enilant he discharged hy due course of law \s had. (;!) A niai:;istrate thus ahnsed and iiisiilteil while actiiiy: Jndieially may insti-ad of exercisinn-. himself, the jiower of committ.il for eontem|it. |iroeeed. if he thinks til. in a U'ss sunnnary maniK-r iiy way of indiclmeiil an'ainst the oilender. (4) It is said tiial the jiroper coarse is. first, to ohlin'e the oilender to tind sureties for his i^-ood li(dia\iour. and in default of his doiiiij; so tlu'ii to commit him until the lu'xt ([iiarler sessions, unless he sooner tind sin h suri'tics and also enter into his own recoii'iiisanco for his n'ood hidiavior. (5) the result of such a course heinii' t" ohiiye him to answer any indict meiit \\hi(di may he prtderreil aii'ainsi him for the coiitem|il. It seems ihat the power of committal for sticdi contemiit docs not exist wlu'ii the almse or insult is ottered while the justice is merely actiiii^ ministerially. ((!) (1) Yonnj; v. Saylor,23 Ont. K. 513. Af. in Appeal. 2(\ .Vpp. Rep. (Ont.'), 1140. (2) Aslon V. r.laiirave, 1 Str. (ilT. (:!) i;. V. .lanics, .") B. iSt A. Si»4. (4) fi. v. (ollyer, 1 Wils., 3:!L'; U. v. Kevel, 1 Str- 420. (5) H. V. Langley, Ld. Ray., 1030, per Holt, ('. .1. (()) May hew v. Locke, V Taunt. 63; It. v. Jame.s, mpra. I.I.MIM.ITV rmt II.I.I'.ciAl, ACTS. 39 Hill M iiiiiii'i>l I'.itc is iii)| willioiil ml COS. if Nl.'iiidfr or iilnisc is intrinlrii ii|»iii liiiii iil ii tinir w lifii lie is uni acliny Jiidirinlly. lie iiia\' liji\>' iiii actiiiii I'df siK'li words jis ilic Inw di'cins aclioiiiililc : or lie may causr llic s|i('al<i'r to he. Ity aiiotlicr jiislici' oi- maifis- Irah', lioinid oxer for liis ;.;'oiid Ixdiaxjor. (1) ll scciMs tliat. willi rrii.'ai'd to slmidcroiis words s|ioI<cii of a Jiisiici' l)(diiiiil liis iiack. lln'V arr iioi iiidiclalik'. Tims, where a defeiidanl said of a .Midillese.s mau'istrale. I hat he was a scniindrel and a liai'. and the words wei-e ma<le the sulijeei of an iii<licl iiieiit jU'eferred aii'ailist the did'endalit. as ha\■in^■ heeli s|)id<t'ii of the |irosceulor ill his eharaelei' of a Justice and with intent to dcfaine him in that cajiacity. Lord Kllcnhoroiioh iiiler|ioscd and said that as the words wtTc not spoken to tiic Justice, they wen- not indicl- ahie. (2) The ini|ioriaiice of mainlainini^ |>i'o|pei- respect for and <leconim lieforc Justices in the I'.xecutioii of t heir duty should render them careful not to lie t^uilty. ihcinselvcs. of any outraL'c wliiidi nia\- he the occasion of \ioleiice or aliiise heinif ust'd towards t lien i. W here, npoii an ap|i!icatioii for an inforinatioii ai;ainsi a nerson for sirikiny a mayor in tiie execution of his duty, it a|i|iearc<i that the mayor struck the first Mow. tiic court refused lo liranl tiie information. (;;) Tiiey should also he careful not to ahiisc their ])»)sition and not to iiiliicl a wroiii,^ ujioii or iiialii'ioiisK |Miiiish a ])arty or witness, hy the use of iiisultiuii,- or ini|iro|ier laii^niaifc. A Justice who makes u.se of laiii^uaii'c of this idiaracter. without any legal Jusiiticaiiou. will he liaMe for exemplai''- damai;c, (4) liiabilil.v of .^iiKiMiralt'^ and .IiinHoivh of Ilic l»«'a«'«' r«r lll<'K-al A«'<« — .Ma,--ist rates and Jiisti.e- of the peace who I'Xercise their functions illen-illy uiay render themselves liahle ill daiiiai;'cs and I'vcii to criminal iiroccedinys. <'riiiiiiial Uabilil^v.— They are suhject to a criminal infor- mation or to a iiroseciitioii hy indictment when their acts. , hesides ll) K. V. Cotton, 8. ('., 2 liernard, :^13: W. Ke.l. i;)3. ('.') i;. V. Weltje, 2 ('ami)b. 142. iiee K. v. Pocock, 2 Str. 1157. (:i) H. V. Symons. Ciia. Temp. Hardw. 240; (irady's C. P. 2!). (4i Clissold V. Macliell, 2.-) U. C. Q. J5. SO; 2(j U. C.t^ li. 422. 4(1 I'UAithai. hiihk ■{■!> mauisiiiatks. Iiciiiu- illciTiil niid iirmlnrtivf of |iriviili' injury, hit ilnm- dislioii- csllv nr t<)iTii|(lly. nr witli |iiirtiiilily, "f IVnni viii(licti\ •• or n|.- |ir*'Ksivi' iimtivt's. (1) Till- iiTnUllil> ll|inll wllicll llic rolll'l ".vill i III crrcri' liV i;Til III i Hi;' 11 criiiiiiKil iiilnriiiiitinii iin' iml ildiiiilc i'IhmilcIi In iiilniil nt iiiiv tixi'il rule; liiil il iimy lie mi'mI llml. w 1 I'licvci- I lie iinwi-rs of Justices in tlic ^iiiiiiiuirv fXt'ciilioii ol" |i('iiiii laws iii'f fxcrcisiMl liy liiciii tVom .•,,i'ni|ii (ir iiiT-niKil iiiniivt's. tiiis iin.clf cif |iinii>liiiiriii will lu- cxlciiilol. (•_') CriiniiKil iiilnniiations liavc iicfii -jraiitt-il airaiiist ina,i,'ist rales in the tolldwiiij,' aiiidii;;- t'ilier ea-es ;— t'nr a «(//'«i i-efiisal t<> perfonii tlieir (liil\- ; (;!) for (./7o/-^'';n iimlei- ccilor of nllii'e : {[ for ailjiidi- eatiiii,' ii|ioii a mailer in wiiieli lliey liave a direcl |ie.iniiary interest ; (."») for grant iuf^. in order lo serve eieetion purposes, a di-.t ress warrant for poor rales. ai,Miiis| tlie oeeiipiers of a iiouse. after tile iaiiiliord liad tendered tiie amount to t lie overseer ; ((1) for refnsiiiii' lieeiist'N to piiliiieaiis wlio. at a iioroiitjii eieetion. liad voted aifiiinsl llie candidates recomiiieiided iiy tin- magistrates, tlie maijistrates liaviii^'. iii't'ore llu' election. iiireatene(| to witliiiold liceiiM's from tliose win) slionld so vole: (7) for refiisine' a lieer licen-e to an innkeeper merely from a nioiiveof resentment against liiiii for liaving Joined in an atlidavit made in sujiport of some in- terest adverse to tiiat (■spoused i.y tiie Justices and llieir friends : (S) for improjierlv ii'rantiiiir iin ale license to a per.-on to w lioni tiie <;cneral nieetinu' of matiistrates liail. on tlie ground of mislieliavior. refused a license ; (!•) and in anotiier ease tlie iua,ni>t rate was. for a similar ott'eiiee. prosecuted liy indictment. (I(>) (1) Ej pnrh Fentiman, 2 Ad. iS: Kl. 127; R. v. .Iiickson, 1 T. R. fio:^ ; H. v. liarron, ". 1!. & Aid. 4;!2 ; R. v. StafJ'ordsliire, J. .1., 1 Ciutt. li. 217. {'.') Paley, 4 I'.d. 42o. (3) R. V. Vox, 1 Str. 21 ; R. v. Newton, 1 Str. 413. (4^ R. V Yon. ctf. 1 (Inde.'s Cr. Pr. \\l,vott: Seealsu R. v. Junes, I Wilg. 7. (5) R. v. Davis, l.oll't. f,2. (0) R. v. ( "o/.ens, 2 Done- 42(1. (7) R. V. Williams, :'> 15nrr. 1:517. (8) R. V. llanii & Price, :> Rnrr. 1710. (!)) R. V. Holland it Foster, 1 T. R. ()92. See also R. v. Filewood 2 T. H. H,"). (10) R. V. Saiusbury, 4 T. R. 451. < IILMIN.M. I.IAIIII.ITV. 41 It i>< lint lli'fiw^iiry In >lin\\ ii cnl'I'Mlil Inulisr in | lit' nnlinjll'V •srii-f III' llic wiii'il • (ui'i'iipt." I r t lie illc;,'al jicl of tin- iiiiiiiisi rale i> ilniii' ri'iiin /)iis«iiin "T ojijiosiliim on liis [tiii'l. lliMl. ininnlini; In .\sliiir-l. .1. i- ;i- I i'ri'ii|p| ji- if lie artcd tVdin |ii(iiiiiiirv tiiii>i(|i'iii- rh.ii>. (1) So. lliiil. wIiiTf ciTtiiiii pcrsniis wci'c (Inly runiniilh'd liy n nni^is tnilc lor riMirlfcii (l;iy>. nndcr I lie \'iii,n'iinl Ad. (IT ( iru. 2. c .')). ami w I'lT. liy ni licr nut L;isl fill cs. disclnii'^fcil IVnni cnsidiU' dii ^^JTiny li;iil In a|p|ii';inil llu'nt'Xl i|M;irlci' s(.^>iiins In |irn>ccnl(' :ni ii|i|M';d. llwcniii'l luiidf iil»nliut' 11 iMilc I'nr :i criniinid intni-niiition iij^aiiist tin- lallcr nia<j;itl riili'-. llirir aclinn licini^ cnnsidcr.'d yrnxs mis- l)i'iia\ inr wliicii cniild nnl iir iMi|iiit('d l<> Micrc inisiakc nr i<;nni'aiici' *<\' liir law. (:.') in annlliri' ra>f a rnic nisi was issn('(| a/^idnsl a inairislralf i'i>y having', in iii> nllicc ny fajiacily as sucli. s|ink('n alMisivcl\- .rf ni Imm' niajjislraU's. and {'>>\- liavin^ ini|inli'(| In lln- lallcr cmTiiiiiinn in lin-ir adiiiiiiislralinn n|' jnslicc, (."!) .\ criminal injnrmalinn was yranicd aj^ainsi jnsiico \i,y niakinij a false I'cinrn in a inandanms ; (4) luil in a sulisciiufnl case the iniirt cxin'i'ssi'd a dnul)l wlu-l Iht a;» iiitui-nnitinii slinnld lie yranird in siwli a case, iinlt'ssilic i-clnrn was cniTniilly and wilt'nll\- lalsr. (5) An intnrnialinii will not lie ^ranlt'(l 'i^ainsi a nni^iNl rale tnv (•nnvictinii-. unless. Iiesides setting; InrtJi the nlliei- essential grninid-. the a|i|ilieanl sweai's in Ids attidavil tlial lie is imioocnt nf tlie <-liarge aiiainsi liini. ((i) An iiiini-nuitinn was I'l'tused against a nnigistrale {\<v an a^-aull cohiniitti'd hy luiii nn an attorney who liad sevi-fal davs previnusly (•nndneted certain pfoceedings anainst inni liel'nre n| Iter magist rates, tlie assanll nnl l.eing niie cnrnmilted l.y luin in Ids inililie and niagisterial l>nl in Ins [irivate ca|)acil\-. (7) (1 ) R. V. Brooke and otliers, 2 T. U. H)o. (•-') lb., ]!I5. (:i) Expurtf Ewen, 25 .1. I'. 339. (4) K. V. Spotlund, ('as. Temp. IFanl 1S4. (•')) R. V. l.aMca.sliiro, .T. ,1., 1 I). iS: Ry. 4s.-). (<!) R. V. Webster, :!T. K. :!8S. (7) H. V. Arrowsmith, 2Do\vI, N. S. 704. IL' I'liACTICAl. (illl)K Til M.\(i|STI(ATKS. 1 1' I lit' ;ict (liiiic liy ii iiiaijjisi I'iilc lie, (ili(>ii,y;li illegal). lli«' n'Mill of lioiii'st ci'i-nr nr dl' a iiii'i'c inisiakc of iu(li;-inriil. lie will incur no criminal rcs|i<insiliilil y. in R. r. ^o::rns. (1) l^ord Mansticld said; — -No justice of the peace ougiil I o sutler lor igniu-anct' wliei'e tlie heart is right ; on ijic otiier hand wiiere magistrates act from undue. corru|it or indirect motives, they are always |Minisiied hy this court." in anotlu'r I'ase. which was an aiiplication for a <'riniiiial int(M'mati(Mi against justices for arhit rarily. ohstinately ami uureasonaMy I'cfus- iug to gi'anl an alehouse license tiie same learned judge saiil : — ••The court has no power oi' claim to rv'view the reasons ot justices of the peace upon wiii(h they form I heir judgnu'Uts in gi'autiiig licenses, hv way of appeal from thi-ir judgments oi^ iiverruliug llu' dis-relion entruste(| to them. Hut if it cleai'ly apjiear that the justices have heeii partially, nuiliciously or corruiitly intluenced in the exercise of this dist'retion. and have consequent ly ahused the trust repose(l in them, tliey are liahle to prosecution hy indict nient or iuformalion or even jiossihly hy action if the malice he very uross and injurious. 1 f their Judgment he wrong, yi't their heart ami intention pure, (iod forliid that they should he ]iuuished." (li) .\ criminal iulormation will not he granted, theretoi'c. i'mIcss. coupled witli llu' illegal act. tluu-e he some di>houest. coi iijit or opjiressive motive: under wlii(di <lescription. Ahhott. ( '. .1.. .says tiial fear and favi.i- mtiy gi'uerally he included. And if. on an apldication for a criminal infornuitiiin. an order nisi lias heeii gi'auted. the court will dischiirge it on seeing that the magistnite did not act fr<un thecoi'i'upt motives charged. (:>) The wends of Ahhott. C .1.. are as follows : — -Tliey are indeed, (the justices), like any other suiiject. aiiswerahle to tiie law for tht' faithl'ui and upright disciiarge of tlieir trust and duties. Hut whenever they have lieeii ehalU'iiged upon this head, either hy way of indietment or application for a criminal information, the (iuesti<in has always Iteeii. not whetiier the act done might upon full investigation he found strictly right. Imt from what motive (1) H. V. Cozcnfl, 2 Dong. 416. (•2) R. V. Yonng & Pitts, 1 Hnrr. 55(i. (M) H. V. Bayhs, 3 Burr. K-.KS; R. v. Ailiay. •_' Burr. (m-J. CUIMINAI, I.IAIill.lTV. 43 it liiid |prnccc(K'(|. wliftlici- tVnii. a dislioiicst. opju-cssivc or corriiid iii(ili\c — (uiidiT wliicli tear and lavnr iiiuy <^i'ii('rally he iiicludcil). — or rrniii luislakt' nr error. In tlif lomii'i' cast-, alone, liny liave iieciMne 1 he oiijeels o|' jinni^linnMil . (1 ) It', llmuiili the nnigi.^trate was iiol actuated liy any coriMiiit iiioii\-e. Ins act was an illegal one. the eoniM. in diseli.ii'giiig t In- fule against liini. may make liim pay tlie costs. (2) 'i'lius. w hcfe a magistrate i-el'nscd. as hail, eei'lain )iei'soii> uf lUKjUestionalilc snllici(.'iH-y. Iieeause they wei'c ( 'Inii'tist I cade is — I lie <liarge against the prisoni'i- sought to he hailed heiiig sediiiou — and it apjieat'ed. u|ion cause shown against a rule tor a crimimil information, that the magistrates acted only in |mrsuaiH'c of a resolution |irevi(m>ly come to at a general nu'ctiiiif ot' the mayis- 1 rates of the comity, witii the sanction of the Lord Lieutenant, the court disciiarged tlu' rule, hut the magist rati-s were orderi-d to pav 1 he costs, as t heir refusal of hail, merely on t he ground of personal character or political opinions, was illegal, (,'i) The motion for a rule /ks/ to tile a criminal inlormation should always he made prom|)tly. ami hefoi'cit is made, a notice of si.\ davs must he given to the justice of the intended aiiplieati(m agaiiist him. in (U'der that he may show cau.st' against the apiilicatioii. in the first instance, if he thinks Ht. (4) A rule nisi was gi'auted against a justice for iiegleetiug his duty as a county magistrate hy refusing to c'all in the inilitar\- n\- to <stah|isli a suMicieiit force to repress a i-iot at an i-leetiou : hut the rule was discdiargcd hecaiisc the requisite notice had not heen given. (;")) It is expressly enacted hy tlu' CriiMiiuil Code that any justice of ilic pence who corruptly accepts or ohtaiiis or agrees to accept or attempts to ohtain for himself or for any other poi-son any nionev orvaluahle consideration, ottic*'. place or employment, isguiltv .if an indictahle otfence and liahle to fourteen y.'ars iinprisounienl'. ((;) (I ) R. V. Jiarron, 3 B. & Aid. 4;!4. (:.') I{. V. Whately, 4 M. <S: Ry. 4;!l. (?>) R. V. Badger, 4 (^ B. 4(i8 ; (1 .Inr. <,l<)4 ; 7 Jur. 'Jdl. (4) Ej- parte Fentinian, 4 N. i<: M. li'tj; 2 Ad. i*c V.\. 127. (5) R V. lleming, :> J5. i*i Ad.fiGC. (<>) Code, Art. i;i2. 44 PKACT[CA1. (UIHK to MA(iISTltATKS. C'ivil ■iial»illlj'.— The goncval rule of magisterial lialiility is tluit it is only in I'ascs whero a magistrate or justice of tlie peace has no jurisdiction or where ho exceeds liis jurisdiction, that lie is liahle in damages to the |iarty aggrieved hy his acts, and that, where he has jurisdiction over the subject matter liefore him and acts judicially, he is not liahle for any act done hy him within his jurisdiction, however erroneous the conclusion at which he arrives may lie. (1) The pi-ojiositinii that a magistrate is not liahle to an action for anv act done hy him judicially in any matter within iiis jurisdic- tion is so weli estalilislu'd that in the event n\' an action heing hrought against him for false im]>i'isonment oi' for causing a seizui'e. under the conviction, to he made of the phiintift's goods, a conviction valid on its face will, if prodiict'd at the trial, he con- clusixc evidence of the facts tlu'rcin stated, and iif) ])roof in denial theri'of will he allowt-d to he adduced : (2) jirovidcd. of course, that the conviction was not made maliciously and without reason- able and ])rohahle cause, and provided also that the execution U'vied thereunder has been regular: altliotigh the magistrate in nuiking the conviction may have foi'med an erroneous judgment upon the facts. (I!) The liability of justices in cases where they either have no juris- 4lictiou. or exceed it. must not be taken in its limited sense, but must be understood to include not only those cuhoh where tliere has biH'n an absence of jurisdiction in fact over the case, but also Avlu'i'c some statutable or formal requisite has been omitted, if such requisite lie an I'ssential ingi'edient. (4) The defendant is entitled, upon a]tplicaliou. to a copy ,)f the (1) Dice's Syn. 13 Kd. 40; West v. Small wood, '.) M. & W. 418; Cartier v. Bnrlan 1, 2 Rev. Leg. 47."i ; Birch v. Perkins, 2 Pugs. 327: Ilallett v. Wihnott, 40U. ('. Q. n. --'6;!. (2) Basten v. Carew, 3 B. <.t ('. (149; Brittain v. Kinnaird, 1 Brod. & Bing, 432; Mann v. Denvers, ;'. B. & Aid. 103; Tarry v. Newman, ir> M. it W. 65!! Cave V. Mountain, 1 Man. & Gr. 257. (3) iMillers V. Fotch. Holt, 287. (4) Lindsay v. Leigh, 17 L. .1. M, ('. bO; Attwoml v. Jolift'e, 3 New Sess. Cas. IIB. civri, i.iARii.tTv. 45 (•(iiiviciiiiii (Vciiii llif cniivictiiig inagistriilcs. (I) TI103- aro not liniiiid. Iidwcvcv. Iiyllic t'ojiy they dcliviT : and if it sliould be rniiiid to lie dcrcctivc oi' infonnal. from misstating tlic nanicof flio inlni'Micr oi- any otlii'i- fact, witlnmt liu'rc hciug any Ira ud or iiiti'iiliiin In niislt'ad. a more coiTcrl oni' may i)c rctiiriu'd to tlio sessions: and liiccouiM can only tai^o iiotic<" df tlie latter. (2) It seems, indeed, that the formal conviction ma\' he drawn nji at any time hefore t hi' retui'n of tlie certiorari, altiiough such return lie after a commitment. (H) or afti'r the j)enalty has heen levied by distress. (4) or after action hrouglit against the magistrates. (5) A magistrate has even heen aihiwed to I'ctui'n an amended i-mx- viction to the sessions after iiaviiig returned an erroneousoiu' : ((J) iiut it \va,s held that he couiil not do this after tlu' conviction as first relurne<l iiad heen (|uashed either on apjieal or iiv tlio Court of (^»ueen's Heiudi. nor after the dis(dnirge of the defendant iiy tJie (j»uei'ns Hen(di hy reason of t lie convict ion recited in the warrant of commitment iieing had. (7) in many of the provinci's the(|uestion of the liahility of magis- trates and Justices of the jieace is the suhject (d'exjiress statutorj- cmictment. In Ontario, the act relating to justices of the j)eace jtrovides tiiat. in case of an action hoing brought against a ])olice magistrate or otiier justice of the |ieace. for any act done hy him in the execu- tion of his duties as such ju.stice. with respect foanynmtter witliin his Jurisdiftion as such justice, whether such duties ari.se out of the common law or are imposed l)y any act either of the Tmperiul or Donunion Tarliament. or of the legislature of the ])rovince. it •shall he expressly alleged in the statement of claim that the act A\ as done maliciously and without reasonable and probable cause and that, if at the trial of the action the i)laintitt' fails to prove ( (1) K. V. Midlam, 3 Burr. 1720. {'>) R. V. Allen, 15 East, 333, 34(5. (3) Massey v, .Fohnson, 12 East, 82; R. v. McCarthy, 11 O. R. 657. (4) R.v. Barker, 1 East, ISti. (5) Lindsay v. Leigh, 11 Q. B. 455; Gray v. Cookson, 16 East, 13. ((>) Sellwooil V. Mount, 9 ('. & P. 75 ; 1 Q. B. 729. (7) Chaney v. Payne, 1 Ad. & Ell. (N. S.) 712; 10 L. J. M. C. 114. 4(5 I'liACTKAI, <il IHK. Ill MAiilSI'UA'I'KS. sucli allcf,'iiti<>ii. lie sli:ill lie iioH-siiiU'd. or :i vcrdicl ov iinlgiiu'iit. shall lit' jfivi'ii tor tlir (iflciidiml. (1) 'PIk' siiinc stiilutc also jn'ovidcs that, lor any art done hy a justice ol'tlu' iK'acc ill a matter in which, hy law. he has not jiifisdictioti. ov ill which he has I'xceeded his jurisdiction, or tor any act done under a conviction of order made or wananl IssiumI hy the justice in studi matter, aiiv iiei'son injured t hcrehy may maintain any action against the justice that in the same ca.se he iiii<,dit havedone hefovc t!u' iiassini,^ of the act. without making any allegation in his stateineni o1' claim that the act c(miiilained of wasdone maliciously and without reasonahle and prohaMe •-•insc : (2) and further that, if one justice niid<cs a c(mviction or order, and another iu>tiee. in good faith. grants a warrant of distress or cominitnu'iit thereunder, the action, if any. must he against the justice who made the con- viction or <irder. (.!) It is also jirovided that no acticm. as mentioned in the \i\. shall 1k' iu'otight for anything done ui-ler a conviction or order until the conviction or order has l.eei (|'n. lied, either njion ajipeal or njion aii])licati.ni to the high co'.rt. and *hat m. such action -hall he lirniighl for anything dom under any w ;., v:'.iit issued hy such justice to jirocure the aiipi':' .•ance of the iiarty. and whi(di has heeii followed hv a conviction or order in the sami' matti-r. iintti the conviction or order has heeii <iuaslied as aforesaid. (4) In ease of a justice of the peace having gi-anted a warrant of diHtvess or a warrant of comnulnient upon a conviction or order which, either hefore or after the granting of the warrant, has l.eeii contirnied n|ion appeal, it is jirovideil that no action is to he hrought against the justice hy reason (dany defi'ct in the convic- tion or order, for anything done under the warrant. (5) It has heeii held that section 4 (ahove set forth) of llu' U- S. O. c. 7:5, prevents any action heing hrought for anything done under a conviction so long as the conviction renniins niHUiashed and in (1) K. S. O.,o. 73, sec. 1. (2) R. S. O., c. 73, sec. 2. (.^) R. S. O., c. 73. eec. 3. (4) R. S. O., c. 7;i. t-ec. 4. (5) R. S. 0.,c. 7;*., sec. 7. civil. I.IAIIII.I TV. 47 (■(ircc. wlicllicr llicfc Wiis jii iiliction to iiiiiUf tin- cnnvictioii or M..1. ( 1) 'Die jusiici' is not (k'lirivrd oT llic |irolr((ion oT tlic Act liy a lucre ii'iTii'iiliU'ily ill (Iniwiiii;- up llui conviction, such as lcaviii<f a liiaiii< lor liic amount ol' costs to he al'lerwarils tilled u|i liy tlu' clerk, (li) Tlie iirsi and second sections of I lu' Iiu|ierial Act. 11 iV \'2 N'ict. c. -14. are to tlie same idt'cct as llic Hi'st and second sections (aliove set I'ortii) (dtlie l>. .•<. O. c. T-"! ; :ind it lias Ih'cii lield. in I'lngiaiid. tliat lliese two sections must lie ri'ad logel her. and t iiat secti(ni 2 aiijilies only to those cases wlu're tiie |iarliciilar iiroceeilinif in I'cs- liect of winch an a<-tion is |p|'>)Ufj;lit af^ainst the justice is in itself an I'xcess of jurisdiction ; sotliat where a justice convicte(l liie |dain- titVin a penalty and costs and adjinlgt'd that this penalty inid costs should he levied hy distress and sale, luit exceeded his jurisdiction in ordering the plaintiff, in default of payineiil. to he .set in the sto(l<s. which however was never done — hut tlu' penalty was levied ly distress, it was hehl that an action of trespass for soi/.ing the goods undor the disti'c'ss wari'ant was not within section 2. and was not inaintainai)le uu(h'r st'ction 1. whicdi re(|uires tlu' action to he one on tlie case and to allege malice and want of reasoiialde ml prohalile cause. ('!) The falsity <if tlu' cliarge in an inforiiiatioii laid hefore a iiiagis- ate canirot give a cause of action against tiie magistrati' who acts upon the assumption and helief of the truth of tlie charge : and where an iiifonnation contiiined every material avernieiii necessary to give tlie magistrate jurisdiction to make an order to tind sureties to Ui'cp the jieace. hut also contained additional matter which, us was contemled. so ([ualitied these averments as to remler them iiugatoiy. it was held that this was a Judicial question for tho magistrate to decide, and that, therefore, in issuing his wari'ant for (1) Arscott V. Lilley & al., 11 Ont. R. 285 ; Af. in Api^eal, 2:1 C.L..I. -JSS. Graham v. McArtliur, 2.") U.C.Q.B. 478. (2) Bott. V. Ackroyd A anor. 28 L.J.M.C. 207 ; 33 L.T. 89. (3) Barton v. Brlcknell, 20 L. J. M. ('. 1 ; 16 L. T. 212 ; Somervilie v. Mire- houae, 3 L, T., N. S. 294; See also Newbould v. ( bltman, 20 L. J. M. ('. 149 ; Haylock v. Sparke, 22 L. J. M. C. 72; Kendall v. Wilkinson, 24 L. .1. M. C. 94 Basebe v. Matthews, 36 L. J. M. C. 93. a ti 48 I'liACTUAl, (illDK Til .MAdlSTHATKS. till' ;i))|pi'iiv:iiic(' of ihr luiuscd. lie wiis ii(i( acting Avitlmul jurisdiit- tiuii. even iilthoiigh a suiK'rior coiii't might •|iiash his order to find sureties. (1) ft is only ill casi's wlicrc llic |iroductioii of a (•oiiviction would justify the act ujiou which an action ot'daniagcs is iiascd tiiat the (|iuisliing of the conviction is ni'ccssary hcl'orc bringing the action. Jt IS therefore uiinecessarv to qinisli tlie conviction iiefore bringing an action against a magistrate wlio lias haci<cd a warrant of com- mit nieni in a county otlier tiian that in wliieh tiie conviction took jiiace. for tliis cannot he an act ihuie under the conviction or an act wliirli tlie conviction justities the magistrate in doing. (2) It lias hccn held ill Xew limnswicU that wiiere a justice of tiie [leace issues a warrant witlnuit jurisdiction, as on an iiisutticieui information, he is liahle to an action of tn's|>ass for assault and false imiirisonment ;U tlu' instance of the person arri'sted under such warrant, and that the ([uesiion of reasoiiahU' and jirohaliie cause cannot arise in such a case as this, hut only in a case in Avhieh the justice has jurisdiction, (li) Hiiactmeuts. similar in effect to those aiiove cited from the Ontario slatnte. are contained in the statutes of the |irovinees of Xova Scotia. Xew BriinswicU and i'riuee Kdward Jsland. it being tliere jn'ovidi'd that every action against a justice of the peace or a stijiendiary magistrate for any act done in the execution of his ottiee. with respect to any matter witliin his jurisdiction shall expressly allege that the act complained of was done maliciousl}' and without reasonable and jirobahle cause ; and that in case of the plaintiff failing at the trial to jirove this alk'galion. judgment shall be given for the defendant ; (4) and. furthei'. that no justice /wn(//?(/e issuing a warrant of distress or commitment founded on the conviction of another justice shall be liable for iiuy defect in the conviction or order or other want of jurisdiction in llie justice who made it. (;")) (1) Sprung v. Anderson, L'li U. C.,C. P. 152. (2) .lones v. (irace, 17 Ont. R. tiSl. (3) Whittier v. Diblee, 2 Pugs. 243. (4) R. S. N. S. (1884), c. 101, sec. 12; C. S- N. B. (1877), c. 90, sec. 1 ; Acts of P. E. 1. 185:! to 1862), c. 16, sec. 1. (5) R. S. N. S. (1884), c. 101, sec. 15, C. S. N. B. (1877), c 90, sec. 3; Acta of P. E. I. (1853 to 1802), c. 13, sec. 3. civil- I.IAJJIMTY. 49 Tt is nlso provided tlisit ;iii action liroiii^lit aLfaiiHt a jiisiicc of the peace lor an act done in a nnitter wliei'e In- Inis no jurisdiction or exceeding Ids jurisdietitm need not alle:i;e malice and want of reasoiialile and proiiaMe cause, iiul tiiat no action in such a case, siudl he hrouu'ht until such conviction shall iuive heen «[uaslied. (1) In Nova Scotia and .New Brunswick, it is turther pi'ovided tinit. where a warrant of distress or coiiiniitmeiit siiall hi' ifraiited hy a- justice o| the peace u|>on a conviction ()!• oi'der winch, eithi-r hefoi'w oi" aftei- the n'ranliuy- of the warrant, shall havi- heen continued ui>on appeal, no action shall he hroui;-ht an'ainst the Justice ^-rant- ing the warrant, for anylliin!.i- done thei'i'uuder. hy reason of any detect in suidi conviction or order. ('2) ruder the ()ntario .Vct.no action can he hroui^dit a^'aiiist any Htipeudiary ny police magistrate or justice of tlu' pi'ace for anv act done liy him under tin- supposed authority of u statute or statutory provision of the Province or of the Dominion of ('anaila. which 'Statute or statutory provision was heyond the lenishitivi' jurisdic- tion of the Li'.ii-islature of the J'rovince or of the Parliament of Canada, as the easi^ may he. jirovided tlu' action would not lie a,i,'aiiist him if tlu' stiitute or statutoiy lu-ovisiou had heen within the le.n'islative Jurisdiction of tlu' I'arliament or Legishiture which assunu'd to enact tlu- .same : (3) and that where an order is niado quashing a suiniuary conviction, tiie court may. if it thinks tit so to do. provide tluit no action for a trespass shall he l)rought again.st the Jusiice of the peace win) made the conviction. (4) Til the I'rovince of (Jue h'c. it has been held that in order to ren- der a Justice of the pea( ■ lial)le in damages there must he malico and a want of reasonable and i»robal)le cause whether the act com- plained of is within his jurisdietion or not. (5) U^iere Justices of the peace acted illegally and maliciously, iu committing a person to gaol for refusing as a witness to answer (I ) R. S. N. 8. (1884), c. lul, sec. 13 ; C. S. N. B. (1877), e. 90, ss. 1, 2 ; Acts of P. E. I. (1853-1 S(i2), c. 13, sec. 2. V2) R. S. N. S. (1884), c. 101, sec. 17 ; C. S. N. B. (1877), c. 9(i, sec. (i. (3) R. S. 0., c. 73, sec. 8. (4) R. S. 0., c. 73, sec. 10. (0) Maroisv. Bolduc, 7 Rev. Ug. 148; Leclerc v. Co.,eland, Ramsay's A pp. Cas. l>35; Huston v. ('orbeil, 7 L. N. 325. 60 I'KArTICAl, (il IIiK, TO .MA( ; I STK ATKS. an irri'lrxiiiil i|ii('s|inri at a trial wliuli i<m)U |p|a(i' ln'lurc | licm. — -tlic ordi'V i)f iiii|H'is()iiiM('iil liciiiif siii-iicd out ol' court soiiic ilay> al'lt'f the tcnniiialioii of tlir trial, and iiiidcr circiiinstaiici's indicaliiii;' inaliff.--! licy wci'c held rcspoiisililc in daiiian'cs. (1) M|><'4'ial l*r4»viNi4»iiK4»l llio ('4»4I«'iim f <» l<'4»i*iiialili«'N itV A4'ii4»ii. — Tlic ( 'I'iiiiiiial ( 'o<lf contains t he I'oMdwini;' |iro\'i- sions witli rci;ard to tlic lorinaiitics necessary to l>e (disei-ve(| in coiinectioii witli actions aiiainst [lersons ailniinistcrinu' tlie criminal law : liiiiiil»H4»ii 4»l Tiiii«' aiKl I'Iikm' <»!' A4*li<»ii. — Mvery action and prosrcution an'ainst any person for (tni/thinij purportliuj to be done in pursuance of any Act of the Parlinment of CanaJa relatimj to criminal law. shall, unless otlierwise provided, lie laid andtrie(| in tlu' district, county oi' other judicial divisiou, wliere the act was counnitted and not elsewliere. and shall not he coin- menced t-xcept within six nunillis ni'Xt at'lei- tht- act coniinitted. (Art. !I7.").) X4»tio«' ol A«'ti4»ll. — Notice in wi'itinn' of smdi action and of the cause thereof shall he y-iven to the defendant one month at least hefore the commencement cd' the actitm. ( Ai'l. !t7<i.) llofViK'C. — In any su(di action the defendant may i>lead the iicueral issue, and ii'ivi- the pro\isi()us of this title an<l the special matter in evidence at any trial Innl thereupon. (Art. DTT.) Tt'iidcr <»r l*»yiii«'iif in ('4»iirt. — No |ilaintilf shall recover in any su(di action if teiuU'r of sutHcient amciids is made hefore sucdi action l>roui>;ht. or ii' a surticient sum of n\oney is paid into court hy or on heludf of I lie defendaid after sucli action brouiylit. (Art. !I7H.) €'oMtN. — If sucli action i.s commeiu-ed after the liiiu- liereliy limited for hriun'in^ the same, or is hrouii;ht or (iu- venue hiid in any other ])lace tlian as aforesaid, a vei-dict shall lu' found or judgment shall he given for tlie dofendaid ; and thereupon, or if (1) Gauvin v. Moore et al., 7 Mont. L. R. ^76. KnItM M.ITIKS iiK ACTlnNS AliAlNST .MSTICKS. 51 llic |iliiin(itl' luM'oiiu's iKnisiiit. or iliscoiiliimcs any siicli nctioii iit'tor isKiic jniiicd. or il' ii|m>ii (Icimirri'r ni- otlicrwisc iii(li;-iii"iit is Lcivcii imiiiu-l iIh' |ilaiiilitV. tin- (Icffiiilaiil sliall. in tiif liiscrctioii of tlio court. I'ccovci- \\\> full costs as Ih'Iwccii solicitor and client, aixl sliall iiavc the liUc remedy for the sanu' as any defendant lias l)y law in other cases ; and allhoiiiidi a verdict or judii'nient is y'lviMi for the plaintilV in any su(di action, sncli jdainlilf shall not have costs au'ain^l the ih'fendant. unless ihc jndi;-e licfore whom the I rial i-' had cert i lies ins approval of the action. ( .\ rl . HTH. ) miicr ll«'iii«"«li«'« ^aiv«'«l. — Notliinii' herein sliall prevent ihcclVeit of any Act in lorce in any Province of Canada, for the protection o|' justice- of i lie peace (U- other otlicers trom vexatious actions for thiim's purjiorlinu' to he done in the |ierforniance of llieir duty. ( .\rt. MSd.) NpiM'iiil l*i*4»viHi4»ii!s 4»l I'iMiviiK'ial Aol*>». — The sia tutes of iIh' l*ro\inccs of ( )nlario. (^ludiec. Nova Scotia and New iirunswi(dv provide that no ai'lion shall he l)r(Uindit aiiainsi a Jus- tice of the in'ace foi' any thiui;' done iiy liini in the i'.\ecutioii of lii.s ottico. unless t lie saiiu' is coniiuenced within six nionlhs after the act coniplaiiu'd of was cominilti'ij : (1 ) nor unless notice in writing (d' such action and of the cause tliereid' siiail Ite niven to tlio defendant one month at least lieforo the conimencenieut of tiio acticni. (!') In I'rince Kdward island tiu' time limited for commencinn' an action aiiiiinst a justice of the peace for any act done i>y him in the execution of his otHce. is tliree Tiioutiis: and there must he ii month's notice in writing; given before the action is commenced. (3) As to the computation of the limited time where tiie cause of action is a continuing one. — imiu'isonment for instance. — the action, wlien the limited time is six montlis. may ht' l)rought within six months from the last day of the imi)risoiimcnt ; and wlicrc in a (1) R. S. O., 0. 7;'., sec. i:'.; R. S. Q., Art. 25!t8; R. S. N. S. (1884), c. 101, sec. 19; C. S. N. B. (1877), c. 29, sec. 19. (2) R. S. 0.,c. 73, sec. 14; C. C. P. (Que.), Art. 22; R. S. N. S. (1884), c. 1 1(1, sec. 20 ; C S. N. B. (1877), c. 90, sec. 8. (3) Acts of P. E. I. (185;'. to I8(*2), c. KJ, ss. 7, 8. 6'J I'HACTICAI. (il lliK 'I'n M \(i ISTIIATKS. imrliculiir cii-^c llic impi'isinniU'Ul fxpii'i'd im ilic lUli I >r(tiiilici'. iiiiil llic wril ill llic iii'lioii was siK'd <ml on the I Uh .Funr fullow- iii^', it was licid tiiiil llic loniiiT day \va> tu ln' cxcliidt'd, and tlial. I licri'Inrc. tlic ariiuii was in time. (1) As. Iiy ArticK' it'd (aliovc set lorlli) of ilic Code, ilic notice of action iinist lie given one iiiontli. (tt least, iiel'ore ilic suit i- coin iiieiiccd. llic liay ol'giviiiu: llic notice and tlic day of .Miing (nit tin- writ ill the action arc lioili to l>c excluded. (2) In Ontario, it has lieeii licid ilial wliere a nian-i--t rate act- in direct coiit ravciil ion of the statute in issuing a warrant, without, the |iro|iei' inforination under the statute, or without e\-en a verhul charge having heeii laid against the |)laiiitiff. and t Iicih' is no evidence (d' goiKl faith on hi> part, he is not eiilitlcd to notice of action. (I!) Ill another Ontario case.it was held that where a magistrate acts ciearl_\' in excess of. or without Jiirisdiciion. he is lu'verthcU^ss (jjitilk'd to iiotiei'. unless the lionajides of his conduct he dis|>roved : hut that the |ilaintill' may roqiiiro the ([uesHon to lie left to tin- Jury, and that if they find that he did not hoin-stly helieve iu- was a(-ting as a magistrate, he has no claim to notice-. (4) When- a justice acts (-itlii-r without jurisdiction, or i-ntirely in excess of his jurisdiction, the notice of action lu-i-d not contain an alh'gation of inaliee. (5) A justice of the pence is entitled to iiotici- of action whenever the act coiiiplained of has heeii dom- hy him in the honest helief that he was acting in the exc-cution of his duty as a imigist rati-. (G) ill an action against a Justice of the peace and a ciJiistahle for having issued and executed a search warrant against rhe plaintiff for having and concealing goods helonging to another, it was held that the notice of action and statement of claim being each ol them (1) Hardy v. Ryle, 9 B. & C, 003; Massey v. Johnson, 12 East. 67. (2) Young V. Higgins, (i M, & W. 49, 5L'; R. v. Herefordshire J. J., 3 B. & Aid. 581 ; R. v. Shropshire .T. ,1., 8 A. & E. 113. (3) Friel v. Ferguson, 15 U. C. C. P., 584. (4) Neill V. McMillan. 25 U. C, Q. B., 485. (5) Hatch V. Taylor, 1 Pugs. 39. (6) Sprung v. Anderson, 23 U. C. C. P. 159. SI'KflAI. I'ltn\ ISKiNS iiK I'Hn \' I N(l.\ I. ACTS. 58 t'oiiii(lf(l ii|i()ii ii fiiiiM' of iiclinii iiriNiiin- ill ii cnxc in wiiicli \Uv iiiiiLcislriilf liad JiirisdiclioM. vert- (IcH'clivc lor Wiint of ihr iillc^'ii- tioii tliiil llii' jiislicc liiiil iictcil niiiiicioiisly uikI witlioiil ivasoiiiihlo itiid |.n>liiil>if rinisf. :mil tluit llic >t:itfiiiciil of chiim wiis also ilcfin!- livc ill nol slmwiiii,' a rii;lit to rt-slil iilioii of tlic proiicrtv. altlioiiifli liic |ilaiiititV was aciiiiiltcd of any wrongful taking, ilclciition or coiHcaliin'iil of llic same. (1) Tlic nolicc of aclioii niiist ^tal(• tlic tiiii.> wlnn ami llic placo ulicrc llii' acl forming tin' hasis of ilic aclion looU plafc ; (2) and it nuisl stall' tlic I'avisc of action cxplicilly. WIutc. for instance, a jiislicc liad issued a void warrant directing the constaMc lo taUc the |ilaiiitills goods, and. m (/fi^du/^ o/f/wt/s. to take his liody. and (he coiistalilc. under this warrant, arrested the iilaintitf. although there weri' g Is which he might have levied, a nolici' id' action alleging a joint trespass agaiiisi the justice and the eoii-talijc was lleld defective for liol clea rlv set t ilig t'oi'lh the grounds t<\' the jiisiicc's lialiiiiiy. (^) Tlic notice iiiiisl slate the iiaiiie ami place of aliode of i he phiiii- tifl's attorney ; and it will he siillicieiit if it appears on any jiart of the notice. (4) .\ nolicc of action dcscriliiiig the phiintitf's attoriuy's roidcnce as (d' Uiriniiigiiain generally is siitHcicnt. (5) A notice descrihing the plaint iff s residence as of I lu' township of H,. in the coniity of I*., is sutticieiit. (if) Jn the provinei- of (^lichee, it is i-xju'e^sly Jirovidcd that every justice of the pcaei' and other dersoii fiiltilling a puliiie duty shall, in all cases. Ipceiilitled to tlu' henetit of the iM'oteclivc clauses of the statute with refereiiee to the limitation and notice of action, tender of ainends. and otlierwise. altliough he may not ha\'e acted bona fide in the execution of his duty, and altliough in the tloing of (1) Howell V. Anuour, 7 0. K, :!(;". (2) I'arkyn v. Staples, 19 U. C. C. P. 240 ; Bettersworth v. Hough, Ki L. C. K. 411». (;'.) Mc'tiilvery v. Gault, 1 Pugs, it Bur. 641. (4) Bross V. Huber, L") U. ('., Q. B. 62."). (5) Osborn v. Gougli, :! B. & P. 551. (<;) McDonald v. Stuckey, 31 U. (J., Q. ]}. 377. 54 I'KAfVJ'K AI. (JIIIIK TO MAOISTIIATKS. tin iict doiH' liy liiiii 111' lijis rxc-i'i'dcil liis powi'i's or jurisdiction uini luis acted clearly coiitrarv to law. (1) <'oiii|»4'lliii^: JiiNtivcM. hy iiiuikIuiiiiin. f<» ex«'i*- oiMC tll«'ir lillK'tillllK. — Ifa (diargc la- laid lie to re a Justice, ami there lie no ri'asoiiai)le utouihI ibr doiihtiiii;- liis jurisdiction or tlu' proiirii'ty (d' exercisiun- it. the Justice ou<i;ht to receive the iiit'oriuation or coni|ilaiut and issiu' the summons or warrant ; and it' lie should refuse he may l)e conii)elled to do so, as otherwise the \nw would r.'inain unadmiuistei'i'd. Hut if the justice has reason- ahle yirouud for douhtinii- his jurisdiction, tlu' court will not com|iel him to do an act whiidi niin'ht sul)iect him to an action. (2) if Justices rt'Ject an aii]ilication. on the erroneous i;roiiud that they have no power to li'rant it. the court will interfere, so far as to set the Jurisiliction of the Justices in motion, hy directiui;- them to hear and didermine u)iou the a|i|)lication. {'^) If persons excrcisint'' au interior Jurisdiction ri'fi\se. on a inis- tai<en view of the law. to hear a case, they erroneously decline to exercise their Jurisdiction : and the c(nirt will compel them, hy numrlanms. to hear and decide it. (4) AVhen an infci'ior court alistains from entering- u|Min the mei'its of a case, in consi'(Hience (d its arriving at a wronu,- decision ujion a prelinnnary point of law. this will he re,u;arded as a refusal to hear: and a mandamus to hear and determine will l)e granted. (5) A statute whiidi provides that a Justice may issue a summons or warrant, if he thinks fit, gives him a discretion in the issuing of the summons or warrant ; l>ut he is Ixmnd to I'xercise this disci-etion. on the evidence oY a criminal olfence whi(di the information dis- closes : and if. on a consideration of something I'xtraneous or extvu-Jiidiciiil. he refuses the summons or wan-ant. the court will order him to issue it. (6) (1) R. S. (i., Art. 2m\). (2) R. v. Broderip, 5 B. & C. 2159 ; 7 I). & R. 861. (3) Pit Lord EUenboroiigh, in R. v. Kent, 14 E^at 397. See also R. v. Surrey, 2 Show, 74, n. (4) Per Blaekburn, .!., in R. v. Monmouth, L. R. 5 Q. B. L'56. (,'.) Per Coleridge, J., in R. v. Richards, 2u L. J. li. B. 3.')2. (6) R. V. Adamson, L. R., 1 (J. B. D. 201, MAN DAMPS. 55 Where. iipDii a cliar^^e being laid against a di'fendant (or violat- ing, in tlie Connty of Cumlierlaiid. tlie ^^ Canada Temperance Act.'' tiie justiees deeiined to i.ssue a warrant, on tlie ground that the notice to the Seeretavy of State required to be tiled with the sheriff or registrar of deeds of or in the eouiity was not regnlarh' tiled, ieasnineh as there were two registrars of deeds in Cumberland County, and the notice had only been de|tosite(l with one. and that therefore the Act was not legally in force in the county, it was held bj' tlie court, in gi-anting an aiiplication for a writ of mandamus, that the ])rovisions of tlu- Act with regard to the tiliuii' of the notice were inert^ly directory, that the proclaniatiou having issued and the election having taken place and resulted in the ailoption of the Act. the Act was in force, and that at all events, it was not oiien for the justices to ijuestion the ivgularitv tf the pre- liniinary prociH'dings for bringing the Act into forc(^ (1) A mandamus has been issued in the following cases : — to receive an information or coiniilaint ; (2) to i>sue a distress warrant for costs upon a conviction ; (;!j to hear a complaint when the justices have declined jurisdiction. (4) A munilamus was granted against a justice who refused to pro- ceed upon an information under the PawnbroUers' Act. (;i!t and -id (leo. ;i. c. ilil). on the erroneous ground that it was not a case for a HUinmaiy conviction in a penalty witliin the statute; (■")) and in another case it was granted against justices who refused to hear and determine an ap[)lication for a bastardy oi'der. on the erroneous supposition tliat they had no jurisdiction. ((1) In oni' case, the Court granted a mandamus to compel justices to hear and determine an a|ii)lication for a suninions against certain persons for unlawfully conspiring to break the peace and do griev- ous bodily harm ; although there was no misapprehension of the m. and the ju.stices heanl all the evidence ottered, before they de- (1) I.', v. Hicks, 19 X. S. H. SO. (2) R. V. .^Hwton, i Hr. 413. C!) H. v. Hant., J.l, 1 K. ^ Ad., (154 ; See Ex parte Robert Thomas, Ki L. .1- M. ( . 5(. (4) K. V. Brown, 2(> L. J. .M. ('. i,s3. (5) H. V. Hoard, 12 Kast, (i72. (6) Hj; parte Wallinj^Cord, 9 Dowl. 987. 56 • I'KAC'frrAI, (HIDK to MAiasTHATKS. cliiu'd to issiicllic summons, :iii(l alllioiii^li tlio words of the sta- tutu, (11 cS: 12 Vict. (Im]).). r. 42, .soc. !•)■ w^^v tliat the justicoH may, if th^l/ shall think fit. \s>^\u' a summons. Tlio Court jtroceodod on tlic ground tliat tlu' cvidcnci' g'iviMi in suii])Ort of tho ajipiica- tion was so stvony; as to induct' a belief that the justices must have acted upon a consideration of something extTaneous and exti'a-ju- dicial. wiiich ouglit not to have affected their decision, and tliat this amounted to a declining of jtirisdiction. (1) AVhere a magistrate refused to issue a summons for perjur}' upon an int'ormation setting fbi'th facts on \vlii(di no jury would convict, the court would not. under tliese circumstances, grant a mandannis to interfere with the magistratt''s discretion. (2) The Ontario statute provides that no action or other proceeding shall 1k' commence<l or prosecutt'd against any person or [)ei'sons for or by reason of anything done in obedience to a peremptory writ n\' mandamus. (;>) In the ])i'ovince of (Quebec, the code of civil proci'dure provides that a mandamus nuiy issue, whenever any pt'rson hohling any office in any corporation. ])ublic body, or court of inferior jurisdiction omits, neglects or refuses to perform any duty belonging to such ottice or any act whiidi by law he is bound to perform, and also in all cases where a mandamus would lie in Kngland. (4) ltiil«' ill tlio ^ ait lire of u ]VIuii«Ihiiiiin. — The statutes of some of the provinces, in imitation of linpi'rial k'gislation. ])r()- viile us with a useful sul)stitute for the writ ^A' mandamus, in such simple questions as may be conveniently argueil and disjtosed of upon a rule, the more important (|Uestions ln'ing still the pro|ier subject of an apjilication foi-the writ u\' mandamus.^ This j>rovision. which is to the same effect, variously worded, in the statutes of different pn)vinces. provides that, in case of a justice of the peace or a stipendiary nmgistrate refusing to do any act relating to tlu' duties of bisollice. tlu' party re(juiring sntdi act to (1) K. V. Adanison, mpra. (2) KxparhRe\<\,WK\\eOU. ' ^ ^ (3) R. S. O., c. 7:5, sec. 124. ' ' ' (4) C.C. v. (Que.) Art. 1022. lU I.K [\ THE NATUKE *>V A MANDAMUS. 57 be il(iiu> may. upon an affidavit oftlio facts, apply, in the ])i'<)vince of Ontario, to the High Court, or a County Court judge, and. in the ])rovinoe,s of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, to the Supreme Court, or a Judge tluMvof. for a rule calling ujjon the ju.stice and also ui)on the party to be atfet ted by such act, to show cause why such act should not be done, and if. after service of such rule, good cause be not shoAvn against it, the court may make the rule absolute, with or without co.sts. as may seem meet ; and the jus- tice or sti|)cn(liarv magistrate, upon lieing served with the rule absolute, shall obey the same, and do the act required ; and no action or jn-oceeding shall be commenced or prosecuted against him for having obeyed such rule. (1) The course here ])rovidcd is not intended simjjly for the benetit I of justices, or ccmtined to cases in Avhich their jurisdiction is doubt- I ful ; l)Ut it extends to all cases in which they refuse to do an act ■ relating to the duties of their office. (2) ■L It does not ap|)ly where a mandamus woidd not luive been ^granted : (3) nor is it intended for cases in which the justice has heard and adjudicated and done what he believes to be his duty, whatever may be the eonclusion to which, in the exercise of his (lis( ivtion. he has arrived. (4) ft applies only to cases in which tiic magistrale does not consider the pro[)riety of doing or not doing the act in ([uestion. (5) (1) K. S. 0., c. 7r., sec. 6; R. S. N. S. (1884), c. 101, see. 25 ; C, S. N. B. (1877i, (!. 90, sec. ■"). (2) R. v. Aston, 1 L. M. & P. 491 ; R. v. Fhilimore, L. R. 14 Q. B. D. 474 ti. ; 51 L. T. N. S. 245 ; R. v. Biron, 51 L T. N. S. 429. (:5) R. V. Bristol, .T. .1., 18 .Jur. 421! n. 14) Re Clee I'i Osborn, 21 L. J. M. C. 112; R. v. Dayman, 26 L. .1. M. C. ^29; H. V. Vauglian, 9 B. & S. 329. (5) Ex parte Lewis, 16 Cox 449. SECOND DIVISION. Parties to Crimes ; Extent of the Criminal Law as to Time, Persons, and Place; Special Restrictions. CMAVTVAl IV. I'aktiks to tiik Commission ok Oh kkncks. I*riii«*i|»ul OftVn«l'i<'rM. — Kvcry oiic \- a party to and i^niilty of an otVciH'i' wlio — » (a) actually coimiiiis i) ; or (/<) (Iocs or omits an act tor the •)ur|tosc of ai(lin<>; any person to coinniit tlu' ott'cncc ; oi" (c) abets any i»crson in the commission of the ott'encu^ ; or (d) counsels or pi'ocures any |ti'rson to commit the ott'ence. it' several persons form a common intention to |)rosecute any unla\vf\il |i irpose. and to assist t'ach other tlierein. each of them is a pai'ly to I'very otfeiuH' cominitti'd hy anyone of tiiem in the ])ro- seciition of such common purpose, the commission of whicli otfenci' was or ou<>-ht to have heen known to be a probable conseciuence of the ])rosecution of such common ]mrpose. (Code. Art. (51.) Hvi'ry oni' who counsels or procures another to be a i)arty to an otfeiice of whi(di that other is afterwards ifuilty, is a party In that otl'ence. althou,ii;h com nifled in a way ditterent from that whicii was counselled oi' suit<j;'ested. Every oui- wlio counsels or procun-s anotluu' to bi' a Jiarty li an otfence is a party to eveiy ott'ence which that other commits in consequence of siudi coiinsellini^ or procuring, and which tlu person counsidlini;' or procurinii; knew, or ought to have known to be likely to be committed in consequence of such counselling m procuring. (Code. Art. <i2.) PKINOIPAI- OFFENDERS. 59 Tlu' distinctions lu-twci'ii |)riiicii)iils of the first luul second degree ami iK'tweeii jtrineipiils and accessories before the fact are here done away witli. and all are expressly made principals or [larties to. and cfjually u'nilty of an offence, who (a) acfnally commit it, (b) who do 01' omit anythiny; to help its commission, (c) who abet or assist at its commission, or (d) who connsel or procure its com- mission. . Ill reality, and for all jiracfical pur|)osos. the distinctions between lirincipals and accessories before the fact were removed years ago both in Kngiand and in Canada ; (1) and have since existed only ill name. The Criiiiiiiai < 'ode has di'o[ipi'd these unnecessary nominal dis- tincti(ms. and it gives only two classes of persons as being, in re- garil to the degree of their guilt. |>arties to or implicated in a cri- minal oft'eiice. namely, principdls. and accessories after the fact. .\ principal may lie the actual perpetrator of the act, that is, Ithe f)iie who. with his own hands or through an innocent agent, does the act itself: he may be oiu^ who. before the act is done does or omits something to help its commission ; he may be one who counsels or ]>rocuves the doing of it. or who does it through the medium of a guilty agt nt ; or he may be one who is present aiding ami abetting another in >1 he doing of it . .ii'tiial r«'r|M'lralor tvitli His i^wu HandN.— To be the actual perpet rator of the deed, with his own hands, the offender may or may not be present when it is consummated. .\.. i)ur])Osely lays |)ois()n for B. who takes it. and dies from it. A. although absent wiieii the poison is taken, is tlie actit.^1 per- ])elrator of the deed. (2) .iciiial l*4'r|»(>tratoi* TIii>ouk:Ii liiiiocont Ag;oiit. —To be the actual perpetrator of the deed, by means of an innoceni agent, is. for instance, where an offender, who may be absent when the act is done. uses, as an instrument lo (■ttcct his purpose, a (1) 24 and 25 Vie. (Imp.), c. Si; R. S. C, c. 145. (2) Fost. M{) ; 1 Ruas. Cr., 5 Ed., 161 ; Burb. Di^j. Cr. L. 42 ; Vaux's Case, -I Co. 44 ; Bish. New Cr. L. Com., s. 651. See aho R. v. Kelly, C. & K. 379. 5 60 l'HA( TICAI, (IIIDK Til MA(irSTKATF,S. child luidei' ymirs of discrotioii. a inadmaii (V Dtlior porson of defective mi'iital capacity, or any (Hie excuwod from ivsjioiisiliilit y liy iii'iioraiice of fact or otiicr canst'. (1) Where A induced 15. a cliiid of nine, to take money from his father's till, and give it toliim. A. it was hd't to the jury to sav whe- ther H was uctina,' unconsciously of i;-uill at the dictation an<l as tlie innocent a,i::ent of A. (2) A ii'ivi's to H. a note \\lii<di he knows is forced, and asi<s him to H'et it eashi'(h If H n'ets it caslied. not knowiuLj; it to lie forii'ed. the innocent ntteriiii;' liy him is the guilty uttering of A. tliough A is alisent wlien it is done. {'4) if a per.sou lunployed as an instrument is aware of tlie nature ot' tlie act, hut mcreh' concurs in it. in ordei- to detect and punish the person omi)loying him. hi' is. in that case, also consideri'd and treated .is an innocent agent. (4) K<>ii4loi*iii}>' Aid Bdoroliaiid. — A ]ierson who. before tlie commission of an offence, does something to aid in its heing committed, may also he a ]irincipal. without heing ]iresent when it is actually committed or com)ilete(l. A. a servant, let \\ into his master's house to steal therein his masters money. M continued inside until he committed the theft, hut A left tilt! house before the theft was actually committed. A was a liarty to the offence ; (5) and would now he held a lirincijial. A. u servant, unlocks the door of the house, that H nuiy enter and steal therein, which he doc^s aliout 20 minutes after A has left the house. A is a ]irincipal otfender. ((>) ('oiiiiNelliii^: or AdviNiii^ an Oftc>iic*(>. — A person who counsels or pi'ocures the commission of an ort'ence. or who (1) Fost. 349 ; 1 Bish. Cr. Law Com. s. 651. (2) K. v. Manley, 1 Cox. C. C. 104. (3) R. V. Palmer i*!; Hudson, i New Rep, 9(). (4) R. V. Bannen, '-' Mood, C. C. 309 ; 1 C. & K. 295. (5) R. V. Tuck well, C. & M. 215 ; 1 Russ. Cr. 158. (G^ R. V. Jeffries & Bryant, Gloucester Spr. Ass. 1848, Cresswell iV Patterson, JJ., MSS., S. G., 3 Cox, C. C., 85 ; 1 Russ. Cr. 159. COUNSEI.MMi (iH ADVfSFNd AN OFB'ENCK. 61 (ln(> ii ilirou;:,li llu' iiu'diiiiii ot'u (juiUij a^i'iit is noci'ssiirily iihsnit wlicn tlic ott'oiife iw actuiilly (Minuuilti'd ; or. if ])ivsi>iit. \w would lie dninu' or iiidiiig iit tliu very act itself. It sct-ins to 1k' in tin- very iiiitiirt' of tldnii's that there sliould he no dislinclinii drawn hetwceii tlu- n-uill of one wiio |iro(!invs a erime to heihtne and tliat of the ai^-ent wlio does it tor iuiii ; or. at least, the distintition. if any. >hoidd not lie in favtir of tlie procurer. It is only rii,'ht that the iiroeurer or any one who commits an otfeiice hy the ai,'encv of another should he treate(l as a |(riii(i|ial. whether his agent or in>trunient l>e a guilty or an innocent one : for qui. facit per alium I'acit per se, — what one causes to he done hy another is regarded as done hy himself. ( 1 ) The procurenu'nl nuiy he personal hetween the procurer and the iloer : or it may he through the intervention of a tldrd party: and it will he sulticient even though the emjiloyei- merely direct his agent to jjrocure some otlier person, without nanung'him. (2) It may he direct.—hy hire, counsel, (u- command, or hy conspiracy ; or it imiy he indirect.— hy expressly evincing, (that is. evin.'ing hy some words or actions), a liking for, approhation of or assent to another's criminal design of coiumitting an ortenee. (I',) StU' a mere silent acquiescence would not he sutticient. (4) The procurement must he continuing ; for if th.' procurer re- pent, and. hetbre the otience is cunmitted. actually countennaml his order, and the person whom he has ordered coun.sellcd or procured per.sists in comnut ting the offence, in spite of the ccmnter- mand. it seems that the original contriver will not he held re- nponsihle as a party to the offence. ; (5) but, by having counsulled the commi.ssiou of the crinu>. he may be held guilty of an attempt to commit it, notwithstanding his subsequent repentance. For when a per.sou with crimimil intent advi.ses another to commit an offence winch the other does not commit, the soliciting or advising, in that ca.-e. constitutes, on the part of the per.son counselling and ail i vising, an attempt to commit the offence solicited by hini! (t;) (1 ) Broom's Leg. Max.. i' VA. 643 ; Co. Lit. 258 a. (2) Fost. 121, 125 ; R. v. Cooper, 5 C. & P. 535. (3) R. V. Cooper, 5 C. & P. 535. (4) R. V. Atkinson, 11 Cox C. C. 330. (5) Arch, Cr. PI. 11. (6) R. V. Gregory, L. R. l C. C. 77 ; 10 Cox, C. C. 459. 62 PKACTICAL (iriDK To MA(1 ISTRATES. ll' 11 purHon ordrr, uoiinsi'l or advisi- oiu- criiiu'. ainl llu- itiTson ordered, counsi'llod or lulviMed intentionally cominit anotlu'r. as, for instance, ii" ho bo ordered to Imrn a Iioiisc and instead of tliul lie coinmit atliet't. or if his instniclions arc toconiinil a crinie au"ainst A, and instead oi' doinju; so \w purpose 1 1/ (lunmit (lie crime ai;ainst IJ, the person so ordering will not In' answerable. Mill if it be merely by mistake that he eonmiits the ottence ay-ainst H instead of A, in that ease the person ordcrinif would l)c responsililc. (1) And it is eleaily laid down by liic above Art icii'. (!2. tliat be who eounHels or procures the eommission of any ntlciHc is a parly to it, althongh the oll'ence itself be eonimitled in a way ditlerent from that which was connselled, and he is a party to every ottence which is eoinniittcd in coiise(incnce of siicli coiinscilini;', and wbicli he knew or onglit to have known (o be likely to be coiiiiiiittcd in consequence of sueh eonnselliny ; and. therefore, both by this Article and Ijy the common law, he is liable for every t hi nn' that ensne-> upon the execution of (he unlawful act counselled or com- manded. A comnninds B to beat ('. and B beats bini to such an extent that he dies. A is a part}' to the iiiurdi'i". (2) A commands B to burn C's bouse, and in the burniiiy;. the lumse of I) is burned also. A is a party to the otfence of burniii!;- D's house. (H) A hires B to kill (' by means of poison, .ind instead of poisoning him. B kills C by shooting liim. A is a ]>arty (o (hi' murder. (4) Not only is a person liable for what is done under his actual or jiresumed authority ; (5) but the agent also is liable for an un- lawful act done by him under the express or implied authority of bis jirincipal. (6) AidiiiK aiiKl Al»ettiii}i; at tlit' C'uiiiiiiiM.sioii ol tli*"^ OIlViK**'. — A jierson may be considered as a principal (1) Fost. :570 et seq. ; 2 Hawk., P. C, c. 29, s. 22. (2) 4 Bl. Com. 37; THale, ()17. (3) R. V. Saunders, PJowd, 475. (4) Fost. 3(19, ;i70. (5) R. V. King, 20 U. C. C. P. 248. (6) R. V. Brewster, S U. C ('. P. 208. ArCKHSORIKS AKTKR TlIK FACT. 63 in'csfut aiiliiiLf iiiid iiln'ttin.!;- in tla- I'omiiiissioii of an dH'cnei', with- out Ills |iriscnri' lit'ini,' siu-li a strict, actual. inmuMliatc ))rcsonco as \V(,ulii iMiilo' liim !iii eye or car witness of wluit is |»assini,' ; it may lie a (■on>liMicliv(' iircsciu-c. (I) So that if a nnniluT of jxtsoiis set dill toi-'dlicr, or in small parties, iijion one common design, lie it nnirdcr or an\- oiher otVence. or for any other unhiwful purpose. *an<! each taUcs the part assi-iMied to him; Homo to commit the act. (ilhci's to watch at pi'ojK'r distances and stations to prevent a sur- priNC or Id favor if in'cd lie the escape of tliose more immediately enuimcd. lh"V are all. provided the act he committed, present at il. in the eye of ilie law. for the jiart talien by cadi miin in his parlicnlar sialmn tended to o-ive countenance, cm-ouragemcnt an<l proteclioii to ihe whole n'aiin- and to ensure the success of their common cnterpi'isi'. (2) If. however, the oriji'inal purjtosc of per- sons assemhlinii' and setting out togetlier he a lawful one, and if their t-ommon jinrpose he prosecuted hy lawful mi-ans. aiul opposi- tion to them he made hy others, and one of the o])[iosing party is killed in the slrngnle. the |ierson actually hilling may be guilty of culpable homicide, but the |)ersons engage<l with him will not be involved in his guilt, uidess they actually aided and abetted him in the fact. (■!) .!<•«•«'«!»««» I* ii'.s an«'i' <li«' FaH. — Article (JiJ of tlie Code declares that. "An accessory after the fact to an otlence is one who receives, comforts or assists any one who has bei'U a l>arty to smdi olVence. in order to emihle hiiu to esca]ic, knowing him to have ln'cn a i)arty tliereto : and. that, no married j)er.son whose h\isband or wife has been a pai'ty to an ott'ence shall become an accessoiy after the fact thereto, by receiving, comforting oi* as- sisting the oth'r of them, and no married woman, whose Imshand has been a ]iarty to an offence, shall become an accessory after the fact thereto, by receiving, comforting or as-sistiug, in his presence and by Jiis authority, any other person who has been a party to such (dfence. in order to enable her husband or such other person to c^ca]K'. (1) 1 Russ. Cr. 5 Ed. 157. (2) Fost. ;^50 ; R. v. Howell, 9 C. & P. 437. Sea also R. v. Slavin, 17 U.C. C. 1'. 205. (3) Fost. 354-5 ; 1 Russ. Cr. 163-4. 64 I'llACTK Al. (il IKK TIP M.\<1 ISTHA IKS. The evident luisis ol' this otVeiice i>. lluit li> iissisi iin oU'eiMler to esca|K' |iimishmt'iit is. in principle, iiii olislnielinn nt' |iiil>lie justice, ol'tlie snine iiiitiire as reslstinn- a peace i>tliecr in niai\in^ an arrest, or resciiinii' a prisoner under arrest, and otiier iiki' otVencL's. 'I'o lie an accessory after tin' tact, a man must lie aware of the •;Miiit of tlie |)crson wlioin lie harliors or assists And one does not lieeonu' an accc'ssory after the fact hy mei-ely nci^'iectinn' to inform ihe authoi'ities that a crime has liecn committeil. or hy forln'ariny to ai'vest the oll'ender. (1) 'l"he accused niiist ha\'i' done some act to assint tlie pvineipal otti'iider in relation to the crime whiih he has eoniniitti'd. (2) liul if a person employ another to harhor or relievo the priiici|ial otfeiider. he is e(|iially n'li'lty as an accessory after the fact as if he did the harhoriny,- and i'elic\ inn' per.sonally. (8) The test of an acci-ssory alter the fact seems to lie that he reii- dorw tlie princii»al ottondtM' some active personal help to eiialile him to escape jiunislinient. as. hy furnishiiii;- him with money or food to s\ip])()rt him in liiilin<;-. or hy siipplyinn- him with a horse to eiiahle him to tly from his pursuers, or a house or other shelter to ooncoal him in. or hy using open force and \ ioleiice to protect him. or hy conveying instruments to an ott'ender to enahle him to hreak jL^aol, or hy hrihiii<>- the ii;aoler to let him escajK-. (4) Of course, when a ])i'rs()n actually I'cscucs an oth'udcr from jirison or from lawful custody, the rescuer is not tndy uuilty of heing an acci'ssory after tlie fact to the otlier's ott'eiice. if he has actually eomniitted one, but also of the suhstantive oti'enee of rescue ; and lie may be indicted either way at the election of the ])rosecutioii. (5) Hut where the reseue is ejected hefore the princi|ial ottender has heeii eonvictcHJ. the pro.secntion would ]irolialily prefer to prosecute the rescuer on the suhstantive otfence of rescue : for. when a person is in ])risoii or in lawful custody upon a criminal dnirge. it is an ottence to reseue him oi- to he)]) him to hreak ]»rison. whether the j)risoner be guilty or not of the crime charged against him. ((!) (1) IHale, P. CGI 8, 619. (2) R. V. Chappie, 9 C. & P. 955. (3) R. V. .Tw.rvis, 2 M. & R. 49. (41 4 Bl. Colli. 3H. (5) R. V. ^iirridge, 3 P. Wms. 439, 483,485, 493. (6) See Articles 1G5-167 of the Code. R. v. Allan, Car. ili M. 295; R. v. Haswell, R. & R. 458. rj.MITATHiNS iiK TIMK. I NhKIt TIIK ciiDE. 6S Wlifi'c si'\('riil itriiicipil otlciidi'i's iu'c n'liilly of ii JninI cfiiiic. I lie jpfrsiPii li;irlMiriiiii' lliciii is tfiiilty nt' n si'|iiinit(' oflciicc tui- caili nl' I lie (iHcllilfr'^ wliolll lie liill'lpol's, (I) CMAI'TKIf V. I'lXTKNI' (iK IIIK ('itl.MINAI. L.WV AS TO Tl.MK. PkUSUNS. AM> I'l.A.K. !\o liiiiiilalioii 4»f' Tiiii«' iiikIoi* <Ii4> (oiiiiiioii lill%v. — I iiilcr t lie cominoii liiw. lliiM'c is n<> tiiiic limited lortlu^ pi'dsi'ciitioii of iirocei'diiin's jil tlic suit uf tlic Crowii ; and. tlicro- tofe. tlif iiroccfdinn-s in all iTimiiial cases, in relation to wliieli tho lime is not limited hy stat ute. may lie |iroseeiile(i durinfr the lifo of tlie jierson (diarized, at any leiiL'tli of lime after tin' eomiiiission of llie otfeliei'. liiiiiitalioiiNot' Tiiiio iiiidoi* llicfriminal <'od<>. — It is |irovided. hy Article i)'>\. llial no iiroseciilion for an ott'eiu'o ay-aiiist tlie Code, or action for penalties or forfeitures, shall bo eonimenced — (a) after tin e.\|iiration of tiikkk vkahs from the time of its commission, if siudi otience he — 1. TREAso.N. e.\ce|it treason hy killini'- Her ^rajesty. or wliere tlie overt act alle.i>-ed is an attemjit If) injure the person of Her .Majesty (section (J5) ; 2. TUK.\so.vAiii,K oKPENCES (section (i!t) ; :!. any offence a.^ainst Part XXXIII.. relatiiijn' to the KRAiiU- ri.KNT MAHKi\(i OK .mkrcha.ndisk ; nor (b) after the c.vpii'alion of two veahs from its commission, if smdi otfenei' lie — 1. A FUAIil ll'o.V THE (iOVERNMENT (sOCtioU VVi]) • 2. A roRRiri'T PRACTICE IN MUNICIPAL AFt^'AIRS (sCCtiOTl VAG) \ 3. CNLAWFIM-V SOI.E.MNIZINO .MAKRfAliE (soetioH 27!)) ; (c) after the expiration of one veak from its commissi ir.. if such otfence ho— (1) K. V. Richards, L. R. 2 (.1. B. D. :ill. 66 PUACTUAI. (il riiE TO MACJISTRATKS. 1, OPPOSlNd KKATtlNll OK KIOT ACT Ulul ilSScmllHllH- ilf'tOV ))VOC,]a- iimlioii (st'ction s;^) ; 2, KEFUSING TO DKI.IVKK WKAI'ON to JISTK'K (si'ctioll 1K5); 3, COMINO ARMED NEAR I'l BLIP MEETIXC (scctioil lit) ; 4, I,YtN<i [N WAIT NKAR I'lHI.K' MEETINti (si'ctioil 115); 5, SEDiTTioN ul'jj;-irl iiiidi'V sixti'on (soct-'oii ISl) ; 6, SEDUCTION iinik'T promise of mavriiigo (section 1H2) ; 7, SEDUCTION of il wai'd. clc. (section ISi-J) ; 8, UNIiAWKUUUy DEKll,IN(i \V(t.MEN (section IS')) : 9, PARENT OR (ilARDlAN PROCURlNCi DEKl I.K.MENT OK GIRL (Sec- tion 1S(>) : 1(1. IKiUSEilOLDERS PKRMITTINO DEFILEM Eh'T ol' (ilRLS OX THEIR PREMISES (section 1ST) ; nor (d) after the ex|iiiMtion of SIX :montiis from its commission, if the otfenee be — 1. UNLAWFUL DRiLLiXd (section S7) : 2. BEING UNLAWFULLY DRILLED (section SS) ; 3. IIAVINO POSSESSION OF ARMS for ])UViJOses thmgernus to the l)nl)lic peace (i'art VI.. section 102) : 4. PROPRIETOR OK NEWSPAPER PUBLISHING advertisement oti'er- ing REWARD for recovery of stolen i)ro|K!rty (section 157, pi.ra,i;ra])h (d) : nor (p) after the e: i iration of three months from its commission, if tlie offence be — 1. cruelty to ANIMALS (under sections 512 and 5i:]) : 2. railways vioLATiNti PRoAMSiONS relating to conveyance of cattle (section 514) : 3. REFUSING PEACE OFFICER ADMISSION To CAR. etc. (section 515) ; nor (f") after the ex})iratioii of one month from its commission, if the otfence be — 1. IMPROPER USE OF OFFENSIVE WEAPONS (sections KKS. and 1(I5 to 111. inclusive). And the same Article furthei- i)rovides as follows : — No person shall be prosecuted, under the provisions of section (i5 or section (!!» of the Code, for anv overt act of treason. itTllEK LIMITATIONS. 6*7 t'xpivsscMl or (lecliiird \>y (^pcii and mlvisi'd sjioakiiig-, unk'ss iiifonu- ation of suoli overt act, and of the words by wliicli the same was exprcHst'd or declared, is u-jvoii u|ioii oath to a justice within six DAY.s after the words are spoken, and a warrant for tlie a])pre- hension of tlie oti'eiider is issm-d within tk.\ days after such information is yivi-n. Otlit>r UiilitatioiiM.— An infornialion or eo!n|tlaint in summary proceedings in respect of any otfence under tiie follow- ing Acts, must lie laid within twki.vk months from tlie time when the matter a'-ose. namely, in respect of — (a) .Vny otfence agair.st the Steamboat Inspection Act; (1) or (Jj) Any ortence against the Inspection of Ships Acts; (2) o. (c) Any otfence against (he Deck and Load Linei Act. Qi) All ijroceedihgs under the Trade Marks Act must he hrouglit within twelvk months froni the commission of the otfence. (4) Kvery penalty and torfeiture incurred under the Cullers' Act must (excejil where otherwise provided) he. sueil for within TWELVE MONTHS after the otfence is committed, (f)) No action ov i.vosecution tmder the Copyright Act can he com- menced more than two vkaks aftei' the cause of action ari.ses. (6) ; IVnalties under the Fisheries Act. or the regulations made under [ it. must he sue.l for within two ye.vhs from the commission of ! the offence. (7) And i)ru.seeuti()ns under the Electric Light Inspec- tion Act must he commenced within three .months, (8) No information or complaiul. in suTiimary proceedings, in the ca.se of any violation of the Montreal Harbor Commissioners' Act. 1S!)4. or of any hy-law uiuh-r that Act. can he made or laid after (1) 52 Vic, c. 23, sec. 5. (2) 54 and 55 Vic, c 37, sec 13. (3) 54 and 55 Vic, c 40, sec. 18. (4) R. S. C.,cap. 03, sec. 3(i. 15) R. 8. C, c 103, sec 43. (6) R. S. C, c 62, sec, 34. (7) R. S. C, c. 95, sec 19, subsec. 3. (8) o7-58 Vic, c. 39, sec 'M. G8 I'KAITIC.VL (II IIIK rn MA<;lSTKATKS. lln' i'X|iiriitii)ii of TWit YKAKs tVoin tlic tinu' wIumi llic inuttor of i-()iii)»liiiii1 (H- iufonnatioii arnsc. (1) I'roci'i'diiiys for tlu' rccovorv of any iK-iialty uikKt tlie Act of 1888. aiiK'udiiig the Weights and Measures Act as to packages of salt. must In- instituted within twknty i>Ays after (kdivery of the l)acka,ii:e of salt, in res pee t of \vlii(di a contravention of tlie Act is ehiinu'd to have been eonimitted. (2) Coiiipiitatioii of the liiiiitoil time. — In a ease based n]»:in the re|)eakMl statutes relatinif to coin, it was iield that the information and jtroeeediiiifs liefore the magistrate, upon the de- fendant helng taken, was to lie (U-emed tlie ••commencement of the prosecution." Q\) Where the wan-ant of eojnmitinent for ti'ial for the otfenee was within the time limited. b\it the indictment not till afterwards, it was held suttieient. (4) The mere isSMmi/ of a warrant to apprehend the tlefendant was held not to bt a commencement of the prosecution ; (5) but that it was necessary to show, in addition to the issuing of the warrant, that it was executed within the tinu» limited for the commencement of the prosecution. (0) Proof of a warrant to apprehend the defendant was held not to be evidence of the commencement of a jivosecution within the time limited by the 9 Geo. 4. c. 6J>. s. 4. although the warrant was issued within the twelve months prescribed by that section, and although it recited the laying of the information, but it was held that the information itself shoiUd have been given in evidence. (7) • Bringing the prosecution " is not the hearing or trial, but it is tlie initiation of the proceedings by the prosecutor. (8) (1) 57 and 58 Vic, c. 48, sec. 52. (2) 51 Vic. c 25. sec 4. (3) R. V. Willace, 1 East, P. C. 186. *- aho R. v. Brooks, 1 Den. 217. (4) R. V. Austin, 1 C. & K. 621. (5) R. V. Hull, 2 F. & F. 16. (6j R. V. Casbolt, 11 Cox, 385, 38(). (7) R. v. Parker, L. & C. 43? ; 33 L. J. (M. C.) 135. (8) R. V. McKenzie, 23 N. S. R. 6. ('(».MPirTATIf)N IIF TlIK M.MITKI) TIMK. (I!) Wlu'ir till' liiw ivquiirs tliat the |»avty sluill l)i' prosecuted nr tluit Ihi' prosiTiitioii shall Ik- CDinmeiiced within a limitod tiiiu' after the coniiniHsion of the ottcnce .it i.s Muffic-ioiit ti) make the e()in|ilaiiit oi' lay the iiilbi-matioii within that time, althoiii^h tlio eonviotioii may "<>t taUe |)lace until after the expiration of the time limited. (1) Mut where the law provides tlnit the part}- shall lie ronvicted with- in a stated timeafterthe eommis.sion of the otfenee. the mere laying of the information witliin that time will not sufliee ; in that ease, ilie eonvietioii itself must bj maile witiiin the limited time, or it will he void. {'!) '•Sunday" must he eounted, uidoss expressly excluded. (;{) Verbal pr 'that a prisoner, cdiarged with a treasonable otl'enee respeeting the coin, was apprehended, within three montlis after the otieiice was committed, that being the time limited for j)i'osecuting. was held insutticieut. where the indictment was after tliree months, and the. warrant to apprehend or to commit was not produced. (4) Where the prisoner was imlieted, in 18(5!). for nighl ])oaeiiing alleged to have been committed in 1S(>3. and pleaded guilty, he was allowed to withdraw his plea, and plead not guilty, and no infornuition or warrant being produced showing that the prosecu- tion had hoeii commenced within twelve calendar months as directed by !> <Jeo. 4, c. CO, sec. 4. Byles. ,]., directed an acquittal. (5) The time limited [\\y the commeucomont of a criminal prosecu- tion liegins to run as soon as the act whidi constitutes the otfenoe has taken place. For instance, it was hehl in an American case that the crime of embezzlement was committed, and the statute of limitations, relating to that otfence. began to run wlien the defen- dant, as treasurer of a county, failed to i)ay over the county's money, in his lumds. to his successor in otftce. and that the mere (1) R. V. Barrett, 1 Salk. ;!,S3. (2) R. V. Mainwaring, E. B. & E. 474; 27 L. J. M. C. 278 ; Dowell v. Ben- ningfield, 1 C. & M. 9; R. v. Bellamy, 1 B. & 0. 500; R. v. Peckham. Comb 439; R. V. Tolley, 3 East, 4(i7 ; 1 Oke's Syn. 13 Ed. 13G. (3) Ex parte Mmkin, 2 E. & E. 392; 29 L. J M C '>3 (4) R. V. Philip.s, R. & R. 3()9. (5) R. V. Casbolt, ,-mpra. See, also.Tilladam v. Inhabitants of Bristol, 4 N. & M., 144 ; 2 A. & E. 388 ; 4 L. J. M. C 35. / 7tt I'RACTICAI, (il riiK Til MAiilSTIIATES. tact of ii subsequent (Iciniiiid and refusal did not lake tlu' case out of the oiteratiou of the statute. (1) A defeiK-e l)ased upon the provisions of Article 551. !is to the limitation of the prosecution., need not lie specially |iieade(l. but may, under Article (iUl of the ('o<lo. be relied on under the ]ilea of not guilty. The Supreme Court of Kansas recently helil that the failure of a defective indictment and the jireseutation of a new and correct one, after the statute of limitations has lie«>-un to run, does not revive the statute: but that the statute is put aside by the iiresen- tation and tiliiiif of an indictment ajLjainst a defendant, and renniins silent until the legal proceedings thereon are terminated : and. that if a defective indictment is withdiawn by means oi'nnolle prosequi, or dismissed with consent of the court, and an information is tiled charging the defendant with the same otl'ence, the information continues the legal proceedings which were commenced by the presentation and tiling of the original indictment. (2) In an Knglish case, an indictment for night p)oaching preferred against the defendant. MMthin twelve months after the commission of the otl'ence, was ignored. Four years afterwards, another bill was laid and found against him. for the same olfence. and. upon an objection that the proceeditig was out of time, Coleridge. J., doubt- ing whether the tirst indictment was not a proceeding sutticient to entitle the prosecutor to jiroceed. reserve<l the ])oint : but the defendant was acquitted by the jury, on the merits. (H) liiiiiitatiuii ot'tiiiii' in Niiiiiinary rroNC'ciitioiiN. — In the ease of any offence punishable on summary conviction, if no tivxe is specially limited for making any complaint or laying any information in tin; Act or law relating to the ]iarticular case. the complaint must be made or the information must be lanl within six months froni the time when the matter of complaint or informa- tion arose, except in the Northwest territories, where the time within which such complaint may be nuide or such information (1) 8. V. Mason, (Ind. Supr. Ct.), 8 N. Eaat Kep. 71l). See, also, Labal- mondiere v. Addison, 1 Ei. & El. 41. (2) S, V. Child, 24 Pac. Rep. 952. (3) R. V. Klilminster, 7 C. »t P. 228. MMITATION IN SUMMAK JT I'ROSEOUTIONS. Yl mav hv laid shall l)o oxtoiuU'd to twelve months from the time wJu'ii tlio luattcr of the eoinphiint or information arose. (Code Art. S41.) Although this article mentions the making of the complaint and ihe laymj of the information as the necessary thing to be done within the time iimiied. th" making of the complaint or the layin" ofthe inl'ormation. as the ease maybe, should be followed uj) by u.seful proceedings in the shape of a warrant or summons, and the arrest of or otherwise bringing the 'lefendant before tlie magistrate or justice. The tinu' limited is counted from when the matter which gives rise to the ( ffence or cause of information or complaint is com- plete. (1) The general rule is that where the law rcuiuires an act to be done witiiin a certain time after the hajtjjcning of an event, the day of the hai)i)ening of the event — for instance, the day of the coinniission of the otlence, or of the arising of the matter of com- jiiaint— is to be excluded, and that on which the act is done— for instance, the laying of the information or complaint — is to be included. (2) So that where the law required the com))laint to be made within on", calendar month after the cause of complaint should arise, and it appeared that on June 30th a comjdaint was made in respect of an offence committed on May HOth. it was lield to be made in time. (3) Fractions of a day are not taken notice of. (4) The w(jrd month " means a calendar month. (5) Some offences may be continuing offences, such as, for instance, neglecting to nniintain a family, punishable under the law as to (1) Hill V. Thorncroft 3 E. & E. 257 ; Jacomb v. Dodgson 27 J. P. 68 ; 32 L- J. M. C. 113. ^i'^vM.'^'"' ''■ ^"'"''^"^"tsof Wonford, 9 B. .t C. 134; Hardy v. Ryle, ib., bb3; Williams vs. Burgess. 12 A. ct E. 635 ; Freeman v. Reed, 32 L. J. M. C. C') Radfliffe v. Bartholomew, L. R. 1 Q. B. 161. (4) Lester v Garland, 15 Ves. 248 ; Field v. Jones, 9 East. 154 ; Latless v. Holmes, 4 T. R. 660 ; Freeman v. Reed, supra. (5) See Interpretation Act, R. S. C, c. 1, sec. 7, par. 25. 7- PRACTICAL OriDK TO MAC1I8TRATES. vagrants : and tlicsiMiiaA'-lii' always williin ilic limited tinu' ; and tlicii' aiT Dtlonc-i's \vl)i(di may bi' constantly vt'cnrrini;-. as wliore tlu^ law imiiosos a ])onalty foi' disoboying a notice or order, and each disobedience is a distinct otl'enoe, a fresh penalty beinif incurred every lime a similar order or notice is served and disobeyed. (1) in su(di c.ises the time for ayini>- the infornnition runs from the • late of the service of the f ret h notice or order. (2) •• Imme<liatel3' " and -forthwith" do not mean on the instant. but with reasonable ])romptne,ss. and without unreasonable delay, iiavinu rei!;ard to all tlu' cii'cumstances of the case. (;^) Where a statute dii'ccts any act to be imide within somi.iydays. or a notice to be given so many days -at the least." these words mean •clear days." i. e.. a number of intervening days. (4) PcrNoiiN to whom tliv i'riiiiinul I^hw Kxtc'ndN. — The criminal law extends to all jjcrsons. cxce|it the I'eigning Sover- eign, who is absolutely exempt from it. and foreign ambassadors, who are exempt to an extent not precisely determined. (5) liXtoiit of tlio I'riiiiiiial Ijau' of Canada aw to l*la<'l'. — ft is said that, " tlie criminal law of Canada extendM to all otleiu'cs committed in Canada, or on su(di ]iart oi' the sea adja- cent to the coast of Canada as is witlun one marine league trom ordinary low water mark, or is deemed, by International law. to be within the territorial sovereignty of Her Majesty, or committed by any jierson on board any Mritish shi]) or l>oat,on the great lakes or on the high seas, or in any place wliere the Admiralty of Kngland has jurisdiction, and to [)iracy by the Law of Mations wherever committed." (6) • (1) Allen V. Worthy, L. R. 5 Q. B. KCi (2) Knight v. Halliwell, L. R. 9 Q. B. 412. (;!) R. V, Aston, 1 L. M. & P. ''.91 ; 19 L. J. M. C. 2:56 ; Hancock v. Somes lEl. iS: El. 795; 28 L. J. M. V i96; Costar v. Hetherington, 28 L. .1. M. ('. 198; Hudson v. Hill, 43 L. J. C. P. 273; R. v. Berkshire, J. J., 48 L. J. M. C. 137. (4) Mitchell v. Foster, 12 A. & E. 472; Zonoh v. Empsey. 4 B. <& Aid. 522. (5) 2 Steph. Hist. Cr. L., 2-9, and 43-56. (B) Bur. Di).'. Cr. L. 9 ; R. v. Cunningham, Bell,C. L. 72 ; Atty.-Gen. (Hong Kong) V. Kwok-a-Sing, L. R.7 P. C, 179; 2Stepli. Hist. Cr. L. 27. KXTKNT OK TIIK TRIMINAI, LAW. AS To IM.ACE 73 All Ai'ticlc to tlii.s ottl'ct wiis coiitiiiiu'd in our ( "rimiiiiil Code, wlu'ii tivst inti'odiU'od. I)ut. in comnutti-o. it was allnwrd to diMji, ;illlinuii:li considi red to 1h' a correct statement of tlie law. A tbreiiiiici' who comnxits a criminal ottenoe against anotlu'i- forciii'iier. or aii,'ainst a lii'itisli snl)ject. on hoard a foreign ship, on the 'iii:;h seas, outside of tiie territorial waters of Her .Majesty, is not triahle in ITer Majesty's Dominions. (1) This was held even in I lie case of a slii|> wliicli (thou^di foreiii,-n hnilt) carried the iiritisli tinix. 'I'he jirisoiier was one of tiie crew of a slii|i Imilt in ilol^tein. whence she .mailed to Louihin. Huijland. All the olticers and crew were foveifjners. The reifistored solo owner, one H.. was an alien horn, tlnm^ih described in the register as 'of London. Mcrcliant. " The shi|i sailed on a voyage from London, under the liritisli flag. While on the voyage, tlie prisoner killed the master. on lioard the vessel, when several thousand miles from England. and 200 miles from land. On tho trial for murder, no evidence was given that \l. the owner of the ship, luid heen naturalized, or had (ihtained letters of denization ; and it was held that there was HO cvidi'iicc that the ship was British, and that, consequently, the prisoner could not he convicted in England. (2) * ■ Kormcriy. liei' Majesty's Courts luul no jurisdiction over an otteiH-e committed hy a toreigner on hoard of a foreign ship, even if at the time of the crime heing committed, the ship was within the tci'ritorial waters of Her .Majesty's dominioTis. It was ,so held in the case of H. v. Keyn. (•{) That deci.sion led to the jiassiiig of the Imperial Statute. 41 & 42 Vie. e. TA. (The Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act 1878), amending the law. so tliat a foreigner.as well as a British subject on board a foreign shi]. nniv he tried by tiie courts of Kngland or of any of iler Majesty's Doi.'i- unons for an otfence committed on the open .sea. ])rovided the occurrence takes place w(//tm the territorial waters of Jler Majesty's donunions (section 2). and subject to the consent, as to the United Kmg<lom, of one of Her Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, (1) R. y. Lewis, 26 I.. J. M. C. 104; U. v. De Mattos. 7 C. & P. 458; K. v. Kohn, 4 K ct F. 6(i ; R. v. Depar.lo, R. <.t R. 134. (2) R. v. Bjornsen, 34 L. J. M. C. 18(i. (3) K. V. Keyn, 46 L. J. M. C. 17. 74 PRACTICAL (HIDE T<l MAGISTRATES. or. — US to casoH iirisiiKjf in any part of IIov Majosty's dominions oulHidi' of tiic; United Kingdom, — Hubjt'ct to the consent of the Governor of that part, (section 3). • The jurisdiction of tlie Admiralty extends over British ships, not oidy on the high seas, l)ut also ii. foreign rivers, helow bridges where tlie tide ebbs and Hows, and where great ships go. although the muniei])al authorities of tlie foreign country may be entitled to concurrent jurisdiction. (1) So. that a person, wliethera Urilish subject or a ibreigiu-r, on board a liritish ship, on the high seas, or in foreigi\ rivers below bridges, where the tide ebbs and Hows, and where great ships go, is subject to the laws of Kngland,the same as if he were on Hritish soil, such a ship being, in law, part of the territory of the United Kingdom. (2) Thus, where a foreigiu'r was eonvicted. in Hiigland. of man- slaughter committed on board a British shi[» in the river Garonne, in France, about H5 miles from the sea, and about ;{00 yards from the nearest shore, within the ebb and How of the tide, the convic- tion was upheki. (Ii) So. also, where a ])erson committed a larcetiy on board a Britisli ship lying aHoat in the open river at IJotterdani. moored to the ([uay in a i)lace where large vessels \isually lay, 18 miles from sea, between which and the ship there were no bridges, and within the ebl) and How of the tide, it was held that the larceny took place within the jui'isdiction of the Admiralty, and, therefore, that a person who. afterwards, in England, received the property so stolen, could be tried at the Central Criminal Court, as the thief himself, even if he had been a foreigner, not one of the crew, might have been so tried. (4) U])on an indictment for larceny on board a vessel lying in a river at Wamjiu, in China, the jtrosecutor gave no evidence as to the tide Hewing ; but the judges held that the Admiralty had jurisdiction, it being a place where great ships go. (5) (1) 11. V. Anderson, L. R. 1 C. C. K- IGl. (2) R. v. Lopez, Dears & B. 525. (3) R. v. Anderson, supra. (4) R. V. Carr, 10 Q. B. J). 76 : 52 L. .7. M. C. 12. (5) R. V. Allen, 1 Mood C. C. 4!)4. EXTENT OP THE rillMINAf, LAW, AS TO PLACE. tB It lias Id'cii lu'ld that tlic litil)ility of a t'om^rior is not uflbotod l>y tlic tiicl tliat 111' waH. ill tlii' first iiistanci', brought, illi-guliy on lidiini llic siii) . uii'i'ss llio oHence committed by him was one com- iiiitti'd iiu'ri'iy IWr tiic |)uriioso of frociiig liimscif from sucli uiilaw- fiii n'stniiul. Tiicrofuiv. whoro a foi'oigiior, Inving commiltod a criiiii' ill Kiighind, had tied to Hamburg, and was there arrested iiiid torcfd on board an English shii), and, wliilo kept in custody on board such slii],. on I be high seas, he killed the oftict^r wlio had arrested him. not in order to escape, but of malice pre[)ense, it was held that, even assuming such arrest and detention to l)e illegal, he was guilty of murder. (1) liy section 2(57 of the .Merchant Shipping Act, 17 and 18 Victoria, chapter 1(14. (Imp), all otiences against property or ])er.son com- mitted ill or at any place either ashore or afloat out of Her Majesty's dominions, by any inastor, seaman, or apprentice, who at the time when tlieotienceis committed is, or, within throe months previously, i has been employed in any liritish sliip. shall be deemed to be offences of the same nature resjtectively and be liable to tlie .same imnishnieiits respectively, and be enquired of, heard, tried, deter- mined, and adjudged in the same manner and by the same courts and in the same jilaces, as if such offences had been committed within the Juri.sdiction of the Admiralty of Kngland. (2) F A hulk containing the general ait[)()intments of a ship, registered as a British ship and hoisting the liritish ensign, although only used as a floating warehou.se, is a l^ritish ship within the meaning of the above enactment. (3) Section 21 of the 18 & V.) Vic. c. !»1, enacts that if any Brifisb subject charged with liaving committed any crime or offence on board any Hriti.sh ship on the high seas, or in any foreign port, or harbour, or if any person not being a British subject charged with having committed any crime or offence on board any Jirilish .ship on the high seas is found (that is to say, is found to be at the time of his trial), (4) within the Jurisdiction of any court of justice in Her Majesty's dominions, which would have had cognizance of I] ) R. v. Sattler, Dears & B. 525. (2) R. V. Dudley, 11 Q. B. D. 273 ; 54 L. .1. M. C. 32. ^ (3) R. V. Armstrong, 13 Cox, 184. (4) R. V. Lopez, Dears & B. 525. 76 I'llACI'K AI, (11 IliK Til MAdlSTKATKS. siicli criiiic orolVi'iicf il' (■(iimiiiltrd w itliiii I lie limits of it > nnliiijii'V iiirisilictiiiii. sucli coiirl sinill liuvi- jiiriHiliclidii to Urnv ainl li-v I lie OiiNC. as if siicli criini' nr olVfiicc liail Kcfii (•niiiiiiiUcil williin siidi limits. My soctioii 11 of'llu'i^d & :{1 Vict, c 124. if ii Mritisli sul.Jirt coiumits il criiiic on lioai'd a l?ritisli sliip. or on lioiinl a forriirn KJiiu to wliicii iu- (iocs not iicioni;. any court in tiic (^iici-n's doiiiiiiioiis. w iiicli would liavc c(i(>'iiizancc of sikIi crime it committcil on lioard a Hi'itisli slii|i williin tlic limits of tlic oi'dinavv jurisdiction of sucdi court, shall liavc jurisdiction to licai' and determine till' cast", as if the Huid ci'imc had liceii c(unmitted as last aforesaid. (1) . " I iider section :»of2-l(&2r) Viet. c. KKt. a British suliject who. in a forcin'u country, within the dominion of a forci^-n powci'. nuirdcrs a Mritisli suhjcet or a foi'eiu;ncr. is triable in Kngland. This, in fact, was the stale of the law lieforo the passing of 24 & 2.') Vict. e. loo. (2) The leij;islalive jiowersofa colonial Icii'islature areeiuilined toils own territorj-, and it cannot leijislate foi- ort'enees eonunitted heyond the limits of tlie colony. (."5) A magistrate has authority to enquire into otl'ences eommitti'd on the i!;reat inland lakes ot Canada. thoULjli in American waters, for they are witliin the admiralty jurisdiction and as thouii'ii com- initte(l on the hitfh seas. (4) Section 7 of the Territorial Waters Jurisdiction Act delines the territorial ivaters of Her Majesty as hein.«r ••such i>art of the sea adjacent to the coast of the l'nite(l Kin,i>;doin, or the coast of some other part of Her Majesty's dominions, as is deemed, hy inter- national law. to he within the territorial sovereii;-nty of llci' Majesty." and declares that, ••for the purposes of any otiemc declared hy the act to be within the jurisdiction of the Admiral. any part of the open sea Avithiu ouo marine league of the coast. (1) See Arcii. Cr. Fl. & Fa-. L'l Ed. p. 30. (2) See R. v. Azzopardi, 2 Mood. C. C 2H8. (3) See McLeod v. Ally. (ien. N. S. Wales, 14 L. N. 402-405. (4) R. V. Sharp, 5 P. R. (Out.) 135. vSee, also, Art. 5(10 of the Code, p. 106, po^l. HI'KOIAI. HKSTIirOTrnNS. 77 iiu-fisiircd I'niiii Inwvviilci' iimi'U. shiill In- (Iccincil fn lie opt'ii mcu within till- Icn-itiiriiil watci-s of llci- .Miijcsty'sdoiuiiiiiius. ' Si'ctioM IS ofilic Iiii|>oriiil stutiiti', 5:^ & "t'.l Vict., c (i.{ (77te Interpretation Act, IHS'.l). (Iwlairs that tlio oxiuvhsIoh •• (iovi'i-rntr ' >liiill, as ivs|)i'cts Cuiiadu ami Imlia, moan tlu^ (Jovi'i-iior (n'Mcral, and incliidi' any piM'son who, foi- the time hoiny;. has the |iowcrs of I he (Jovi'i'nor-dt'noral. ( Mr APT MR VI.- Si'KciAi, Rkhtrictionh, \ IMloSKCl TIO.NS liElil IKl.NO ('(INSKNT OK Til K ( i OV KII.Noll-( J KN KKAI, . OHciMTw by Foi*(>i(>;ii<>^rN in Ad mi rally JiiriM- -di<'li<»il,— The criminal code of Canada conforms to (he ahovc mentioned Imperial enactments iiy providin<jj, in article .")42. that procoodiiiirs for the trial and punisliim'nt of a person who is not a Kuhject of Ifer .Majesty, and who is char<red with any ott'once com- mitted within the jurisdiction of the Admiralty of F.ni^'land shall not he instituted in any court in Canada, except with the leave of the (lovcrnor-Cronoval. and on his eertiticate that it is expedient that snih proceedings should lie instituted. Proseci;tco.\s liKm;iiu\u tiik Co\sk.\t of tkk Atim.hnky- (tKNEKAI,. 4»l»laiiiiiiK ««• <'oiiiiiiiiiii«>utliiK OfKriai liilor' |llialioil — Xo person shall he prosecuted for the otR uce of unlaw- [fidly ol.tainiiiii: an<l communicatiniu; ofKcial information, as deHned 'in se.-ti(ms 77 and 78. of the Code, without the consent of the At- t..rney-Gencral or of the Attorney-tieneral of Canada r \rt -)4! "ft he Code.) ^' JlKlioial l!«rrii|»tioii.-Xo one holdin- anv jmlicial olKce shall he prosecuted ibr the oftence of judicial corruption, as detined n. section \?A ot the Code, without the leave of the Attorney-Gene- ral of Canada. (Art. 5-14.) 7H VRACTICAI. (iriUE TO MAUISTRATES. .^ukiiiiK or llaviiiK KxploMivf'M. — It' imy ikm-sou is chiirgod hot'oro uJuHtic-o of tin* poiifc with tlii' ottbiici* ofmakiug or having cxploHivo HuhstiiiiccH, as dcHiu'd in section 1((0 of the ('oth', IK) ftirthcr prococdiiig shall Ik" taUi-n against, sucdi |u'rson without till' consont of thn Attorncy-titnu-ral, oxccpt such as tlu- justico of the peace thinks necessary, by remand or otherwise, to secure the safe custody of such person. (Art. 545.) €'riiiiiu»l llrcucli <»! TriiNt. — Xo proceeding or prose- cution against a trustee for a criminal hrcach of trust, as dctiiuMJ in section 'AGH of the (!ode. shall he corunieiiced witliout the sanction of theAttorney:<reneral. (Art. 547.) C'oiii'caliiitC KiK'UiiibriiiiccN. — No prosecution for c(>n- cealing deeds and cncunihraiiccs, as dctincd in section ."{TO of the (Jode.shall he commenced without the consent of tlie Attorney- General, given after previous n()ti<'e to the person intt'iided to he prosecuted of the ap])licatioii to the Attorney-<Tencral for leave to prosecute. (Art. 548.) IJttcrilli; Dc'latU'd 4*oill. — No jirocecding or prosecution for the otfi'iicc of uttering defaced coin, as defined in section 476, of the Code, shall he taken witliout the consent of the Attorney- General. (Art. 54!t.) Prosecutions REQtiiRiNO the Consent op uhe Minister of Marine and Fisheries Nondiiifi^ or Takiii;>; an UiiNcauorf liy Nliip to Mt'a* — Xo ])ersoii shall he prosecuted for any otfence under section 256 or section 257 of the Code, without the consent of the Minis- ter of Marine and Fisheries. (Art. 546.) Live Stock Shii'PInu Act. — Xo ]>rosecution under section 7 of this Act can he instituted except by or with the consent of the Minister of Marine and Fisheries. (54 & 55 Vic. c. H6, sec. 7.) Ofkences aoainst the Safety of Siiirs Act. — No prosecu- tion under section ID A f)f the Act respecting the Safetij of Ships and the prevention of Accidents thereon, (namely, sending or carrying dan- gennis goods) can be instituted without the consent of the Ministei- of Marine and Fisheries. (54 &. 55 Vic. c. 3?!. ) Sl'KdrAf, UESTKirTIONM. 79 Deck anh Ijoad liixKs Act. — Xo prosocution iiiidcr this Act ciin lu' instituted oxcopt by or with t\w coiiMmit ol' the MiriiMtor of .\[aniu' iiiid Kislu'rii'H., (si & 5'. Vic. c. 40, hoc. I'.t.) ('4»iiM«'iil Xoo<l X«l Ik* Avo»*r«'d. — It is uniiocoHsuiy to stiitf in iui indictment tii:it any coi,«oiit required liy the above Articli's of tiie Code liiis lieen oi)tainc{l. (\) (1) Code, Art. 01 :!(/«). THIRD DIVISION. Prosecution of Criminal Offenders. CIIAPTKJJ VII. Indictable and XoN-lNDrrTAHLE Offences. — Jurisdiction. Summary Arrest. IiKlicfakli' and ^I'oii-liidictablo OftViK'cs.— £3- the C'riminal Code, the di.stinction l)et\veon felony juul misde- meanor has been abolished : and eriniinul offences are divided into •• indictable offences." — that is. ott'enees which may be ]irose- euted by indictment. — and, •• offences " Avhich are. not indictable, but which are punishable on summary conviction. (Code, Arts. 535, 530). With regard to indictable oitences, justices have merely the power, as a general rule, to hear, by way of |)reliminary enquiry, the evid- ence on both sides, and, if they think it sutticieut to put the accused on his trial, to commit him accordinglj^ for trial by a highei- Court, while, with regard to non-indictable offences and certain indictable offences specially provided for. they have the right to hear and de- termine them in a summary manner, that is. to hear all the evid- ence on both sides, and either to convict or make an order against the accused, or to dismiss tlie case. *liiriMlii*tiwii ot tlit' CViiitiiial C.'ourtN.— In regard to some indictable otfences. the power to tiy them is vested exclusively in the Superior Courts of criminal jurisdiction ; while, in regard to others, the Courts of (neneral or (^uai'ter Sesnions of the Peace have jurisdiction concurrently with the Superior CourtB. |>l{i>SK( ITl'iN OF riUMINAI- (tPFENPERS. — JUlUSDICTrnN. SI JiiriMliHioii of the Nii|M'rior Oiminal <'oiii*tN. KvtTV Su|K.'riov Uoiirt of criiuiiiiil jurisdiction, and ovovy jiulgt! of siicli court sitting as a court for the trial of criiuiiial causes, and every Court of Oyer and Terminer and (reiicral flaoi delivery, has powi-r to try any indictahie otl'enee. ((!o(le. Art. oMS. ) The Superior <'oiirtN of* Oiiiiiiiiil JiiriN4li('ti4»n in the several I'roviiit'ON, — The expression •• Superior Court of I'riniinal jurisdiction" means and includes the following couvts : 1. ill till' jirovince of Ontario, the three divisions of the High ( 'ourt of .lustiee : 2. In the province of Quebec, the Court of Queen's Bench : '.>. hi till' provinces of Nova Scotia. Xew Brunswick and British Colniniiia. and in the .North West Territories, the Su[)renu' Court ; 4. In the province of Priiu-e Kdward Island, the Supreme Court of .ludicat.ire : .'). Ill the ]irovince of .Manitoba, the Court of tiucen's Bench (Cmwii side). (Code. Art. '-i >/■) KxeliiMive Jiiri.s<li«*f ion of Niiporior Courts.— The indictable ott'ences which the Superior Courts of criminal jurisdiction have the exclusive power to tr}' are enumerated in Article o-tU of the code ; and. iilphabetically arranged, they are as follows : Ass.vii/rs ON TMK (it'EEN, (Art. 71 of the Code.) AnMl.NISTKKI.NO. TAKIMi. OR PROCURING UNLAWKCl. OATlIt!, (Arts . 120. 121.) Breach of Trist bv Pinuac Oipi^er. (Art. IHf).) Co.MRI.VATIO.NS IN RESTRAINT O •' TUADE. (Art. 520.) CoMMlNICATING INFORMATION OBTAINED BY HOLDINd OFFICE ■ (Art. 78.) CoRHii'Tio.v OF Judges. (Art. \S1.) CoRRii'Tio\ OF Proseci;ting Okpicers. (Ai-t. 1:52.) CouKii'T Practices in Municii-al Affairs. (Art. I'M.) Defamatory Libei,. (Arts. 285 to :{01'.) 82 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAOISTRATKS. Frauds on the (tovernment. (Art. 133.) Inciting to Mutiny. (Art. *72) LiEELs ON Foreign Sovereigns. (Art. 125.) Murder ; Accessory after the Fact to Murder ; and Attempts, Conspiracies, and Threats to Murder. (Arts. 231 to 235.) Piracy. (Arts. 127 lo 130.) Eape ; and Attempt to Eape. (Arts. 'ZGI, 2CH.) Selling or Purchasing Offices. (Art. 137 a.) Spreading False News. (Art. 126.) Treason ; Accessory after the fact to Treason ; and Treasonable Offences. (Arts. (J5, 67, 68, 60. 70.) Unlawfully Obtaining and Communicating Official In-' formation. (Art. 77.) Conspiring to commit, Attempting to commit, or Being Ac- cessory AFTER THE FACT TO ANY OF THE ABOVE OFFENCES. Article 540, as originally passed, included the otlences punish- able imder Articles 159 to 169 of the code (Escapes and Eescues), as being within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Superior Courts. At the last session of the Dominion Parliament this was altered, so as to give the General or Quarter Sessions concurrent jurisdiction over them. (1) Concurrent . I iiriNcliotioii ut (j}en(>ral or 4|iiurti>r St'NNioiim.— All indictable offences, other than those above enumerated as being within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Superior Courts, may be tried either by a Su])erior Court of criminal jurisdiction, or by any Court of (lenei'al or (Quarter Sessions of the Peace, when presided over by a Superior Court judge or a County or District Court judge, or — in tlie cities of Montreal and Quebec — by a recorder or a judge of the Sessions of the Peace ; and, in the province of Xew Brunswick, they may be tried by any County Court judge. (Code, Art. 539.) (1) 57 & 58 Vic. c. 57, sec. 1. PROSECUTION OF CRIMINAL OFFENDERS. — JURISDICTION. SJ:} Wliere Oltenders may he Trioil. — Subject to Artitlos 538. 5iJ!> anil r)4(), ovory <H)urt of criniiual jul•i^s(lic!tioll in ('aiiada is competent to tiy all ott'encos, w/ierfiyer committed, if the accused is found ov apprehended within the jurisdiction of such court, or if he lias been committed for trial to such court or ordered to be tried before such court, or before any other court, the jurisdiction of which has by lawful authority been transferred to such first men- tioned court undei- any Act for the lime being in force : Provided that nothing in this Act authorizes an}' court in one province of Canada to try any person for any offence commitied entirely in iuuither ])rovince. except in the following case : Every proprietor. ])ublisher. editor or other person charged with the pnlilication in a newspai)er of any defamatory libel, shall be dealt with, indicted, tried and ])unished in the province in which he resides, or in which such newspaper is printed. (Code, Art. 640). The words ■■all offences wherever committed" used in this Article, nnist be interpreted to mean otf'encos committed wherever the criininal law of Canada extends. (1) .1lsi$;iNtoi*ial •liiriN(li4*tion —Of the many duties and functions devolving upon, and exerciseable by, magistrates and justices ot tiie jieaee, the most important are: 1, the ministerial functions wiiicli I liey exercise in the ])reliminary investigation of indictable otl'ences triable before a jury ; 2, the ministerial and judi- cial functions which they exercise at and in connection with the summary trial, without a jury, of non-indictable offences, and of indictable offences subjected under special conditions to their sum- mary jurisilietion ; and, ;^, the judicial functions exercised by the magistrates authoriy.ed, under Article 5:59, to preside at the trial of the indictable offences which are within the jurisdiction of the 'General or (Quarter Sessions. The ])reliminary investigation of indictable offences may, under the Code, be initiated by and be held before a single justice of the ])eace or more justices than .>ne ; (2) the iiulictable" otfences ren- dered subject to summary trial under certain special conditions, are triable before a magistrate or other functionary or tribunal having (1) McLeod V. Attorney-Gen. N. S. Wales, 14 L. N. 402-405. (2) Code, Arts. 654, 557, pp. 1(11, 103, post. 84 PRACTICAI, (IIIIIE TU MAUISTKATES. du' |ii>\\xTs of two justices i»f the iK'a(.'i':(l) !iii(l.iii fho summary Iriiil i)t' U()ii-iii(lictiiblc! oHi'iu-es. a siui^le justice will iiave jurisdie- tioii. unless. Iiy the eniU'tmeut under which tlu' otleuee is triable suniMKirily. two or luore justices are speeitied. (2) Kxt'r<*i*«iii^^ lli«' P<»\v«'i*K 4>l Two •liiNtiot'N, — The Judiff oft lie Sessions of the IVact' for the city of (^lU'liee. the Judge of the Sessions of the Peaee for the city of ^^()ntveal. and every recorder, police magistrate, district magistrati' or stipendiary nui- gistrate aiipointed for any leri'itorial division, and ever}- nuigis- trate iiuthorizod. i>y the law of the Province in which he acts, to ]ierform acts usually required to he done hy two or more justices of the peace, may do alone whatever is authorizeil hy tins Act to he done hy any two or more justices of the ])eace. and the several forms contained in tlu^ Code may he varied as fur as necessary to render tlu'iu applicahle to sucdi case. (Art. r)41.) ^'^orlli-Wf'Nt Tori'itorio.s aii«l li«'«'%t-atiii. — The pro- visions of the Crimiinil Code extend to and ari' in fore in the North-West Territories and the District of Iveewatin. exee]»t in so far as tiny are inconsistent with the ]»rovisions of tlie iVbr(/i-PFes^ Territories Act or tlie Keewatin Act aiul the ami'udments tliereto. (3j XTn(h>r the North- West Territories Act. tlie judges of tlu' Su])renie Court of the Territories are vesteil with all the powers, authority and jurisdiction vested, before the passing of the Act, in the .-.tipeiuliary magistrates of tlie Territories : and the Uovernor- (ieneral in Council may a|)point jiolice Magistrates in the Terri- tories witli all the powers of two justices of the peace. (4) Every jiulge of the Supreme Court of the Xorth West Territories is given and exercises the powers of a justice of the peace, or of any two justices of the peace under any laws or ordinances in force in the territories; (5) and everv such judge has also the same (1) Code, Arts. 782,783. (2) Code, Art. 842. (3) Code, Art. 983. (4) R. S. C, c. 50, sec. 54 ; 57 & 58 Vic, c. 1", sec. 7. See p. 18, ante. (5) R. S. C, c. 50,,sec.GG. I'ltosKCHTloN OK CRFMINAL (IKH'KMIERS. — JtJRISDK Tln.X. K.") powcc iiinl iiiillioi'ity tni' Iryiiiif otii'iu-fs in tlu' district of Kccwal in as iriippoiiitcd asti))oii(liiiry niiigistratc uikIit \\w KeewatinAct. (1) OtlVMiocs a,u;ai list t lie Uii'jrf/anised Territories' Game Preserration Act. I8!)4. may (after llu- 1st .laTuiarv. l.S!)6) lie sii larily tried l.y (a.) Any judirc of tlic Sujuvme Conrt of tlic Xoi-tii-wost Ten-i- tories. (b.) Any jiislice of tlio iK'ace in and for tlie Xortli-west Terri- toi'ies. (c.) Any conimissinnod otWcor of tin- Xorth-wost Mounted Police (d.) Any game guardian appointed under the Act. (2) F«slior.v O1li«'0rN— Under the Fisheries Act. any tisliery offi- cer or other Justice of t lie peace may. on view, convict of anvof the otfences punishuhli' under the ])rovisions of the Act. (ij) liO<'al .liiriHilivfioii ns to Offf4>ii<'«>N Coiniiiittcd iiiMlcr N|»«'«'ial <'ircuiiiNtuii<'C>.s.— For the purposes of the dnU'. the following provisions shall have effect with respect to tlie jurisdiction of justices : (a.) Where the offence is committed in any water, tidal or otlier, hetween two or more magisterial jurisdictions, such offence may be considered as having heen committed in cither of such jurisdictions ; (6.) Where the offence is committed on the bounttary of two or more viagisterial jurisdictions, or within the distance of five liundred yards from any such boundary, or is begun within one magisterial Jurisdiction and completed within another, such offence may I.e considered as having been committed in any one of swh juksdic- tions ; (c.) Where the offence is committed on or in respect to a mail, (.r a person conveying a post-letter bag. jiosl -letter oranything sent by |"'s(. or on any i)ers(>n, or in respettt of any propertv."m nvup.vi any vehicle employed in ajourney,or on board any vessel employed on an'v uavigable river, canal or other inland navigation, the person accused (1) R. S. C, c. 53, sec. 28. (2) 57-58 Vice. 31, sec. l(j. (3) R.S. C.,e.9o,8ec.I7. W(J I'UAOnOiVL (iriDK TO MAOISTRATES. shiill bi' foiiMidered as liaviiig i-oinmitted hucIi ottenco in any magis- torial juvindiction tlirough which wueh vehieie or vohsuI passed in the conrso of the Journey or voyage during wliieh tlieott'enee was com- niitted : and wliere tiie eentre or .other ])art of tiie road, or any navigalile river, canal or other inland navigation along which the vehicle or vessel passed in the coui'se of such journey or voyage, is the i)oundary of two or more magisterial jurisdictions, the person accused of having committed the offence may lie considered as hav- ing committed it in any one of such jurisdictions. (Coile, Art. i)5'A) This Article is, in etfect. a i*e-enactment of .sections 10, 11, and 12 of l{. 8. ('., c. 174. whidi were derived from sections 12 and 13 of the rm])crial statute, 7 (xeo. 4, c. (34, clause (b) being only slightly varied from the wording of section 12 of 7 (Jeo. 4, c. (i4. which is as follows : " Where a felony or misd'iineanor is committed on the boundary of two or more counties, or within the distance of tive hundred yards from any such boundary or is begun in one county and completed in another, the venue may be laid in either county. in the same manner as if it had been committed therein.'' In oases of murdei- or manslaughter, where the cause of death arises in one magisterial jurisdiction and the death takes place in another, the ])ri.soner may. under the above Article, be iiulicted in citlu'r jurisdiction. (1) If a man commit theft in one nuigisterial jurisdiction and carry tlu* stolen goods with him into another, he may be iudicteil within the limits of the jurisdiction where he committed it, or in the place into which, or any of the places through which he car- ried the goods ; for in contemplation of law there is such a taking and carrying away as to constitute the ott'ence of thett in every jtlace through which, at any distaiu',o of timo, the gt)i)ds were car- ried b\' him. (2) For instance, where a prisoner, on the 4th of November, stole a note in Yorkshire, ami, upon the 4th of March, he carried it into Durham, the judges wore clojir, upon a case re- served, that the interval between the first taking and carrying the note into Durham did not prevent it from being a theft in Durham, and that the conviction in that county was right. (3) (1) 1 Russ. Cr. (by Greaves), 4 Ed. 753. (2) 1 Hale, 507 ; 2 Hale, 163 ; 3 Inst. 113 ; 4 Bl. Com. 304. (3) R. v. Parkin, 1 Mood. C. C, 45. PROSECUTION OP CRIMINAL OFFENDERS. — JURISDICTION. 87 A countvy l»ank notfl was stolen during its transit, througli the post, from Swindon, a town in Wiltsiiiro, to the (vity of Bristol, which lies hetween the counties of Somerset and Gloucester, and the same note was afterwards enclosed hythe defendant in a letter posted by him in Somersetshire and addressed to the bankers at Swindon, requesting payment of it, which letter, with the bank note in it. arrived in <lue course at Swindon. The defendant was held triable in Wiltshire, the po.s.session ol" the po.st office servants or of the bankers at Swindon, in Wiltshire, being held, for this pur- po.se, the defendant's possession, (1) A charge of sending a threatening letter may l»e prosecuted either in the Magisterial jurisdicition where the prosecutor received it. or in the place from which the offender sent it ; becau.se the ort'ence. in such a case, is begun in the one and completed in the other. (2) Where money obtained by a false pretence was transmitted in a letter ])oste(l. in accordance with the defendant's request, in Countv A.. l)ut which reached him in County B.. it was held that this was an obtaining of the money in County A. (3) If two persons steal a thing in one county, though one of them alone carry the ])roperty into another county, yet if both after- wards co-operate to secure the thing in the latter county, both nuiy be indicted there ; for the subsequent concurrence may be connec- ted with the previous taking. (4) Where two jointly committed a theft in one county, and one of them carried the stolen goods into another county, the other still acconijianying him. without their ever being separated, they were held both indictable in either county ; the possession of one beino- the po.ssession of both, in each of the counties, as long as they con- tinued in company. 5) (1) K. V. Cryer, Dears & B. 324 : 36 L. J. (M. C.) 102. {2)R. V. Ginlwood, 1 Leach, 142; R. v, Esser, 2 East. P. C. 1125- R. v Burdeit, 4 B. & Aid. 95. (3) R. V. Jones, 1 fieri. 551; 19 L. J. (M.C.) Iti2 ; R. y. Buttery, 4 B. & Aid. 179. •" (4) R. V. County & Donovan, East. T. 181(i, M. S. Bailey, .7., 2 Russ. 175. (5) R. v. McDonagh, Carr. Supp., 2d. Ed., 23. 88 I'KAcrrcAi, m'lDK to ma<iistii.\tks. 'I'lic tiiUiiin' into llic 1)1 lu'i' (MHiiity IT Jiirisdiclioii must \>v aniino tunmdi. For instiiiK-o, a constahli' upiu'clii-iMli'd a |)ris<)iu'r with twostoli'ii horses at ('roy(h»ii in Surivv. On hcinifso arrested, the |>i'isonei' saiil lie Inid lieen at Doi'Uiiii;' to t'etcli tlu' iiorses. and tliat tliey liel()ni,a'd 1u iiis lirot liei-. who lived at Urondey. 'Die polico eonstalihi offered to yo with liini to Di'omley ; and tliey took the liorses and rode toi^vtlier as fai' as |{eci<enlnun Cliundi. wiien tlio prisoner said lie had left a i>iireel at the Black Ilnrse. in some plaeo in Kent. The eoiistahle. aeeordinj^ly. went there with idm each ridini;- one of the horses. When they ,i;"ot there, the eonstable i^avc the horses to the osth-r. The pi'lsoni-r did not (uujuire for any paret'i. hut miide his eseape. and was. afterwards. a,i>'ain appre- lieiided in Surrey, iind indiiMi'd in i\enl for steaiini;' the two horses. Tjion a case resei-vt^d. tlu' jud^'es were unaniiaously of opinion that there was no evidence to he left to the jury of stealing in Kent. (1) Where a thett was committed in County A., and the receivinjj; of the propi'rty tooU place in Counly J}.. it was hold that hoth woro trialili- in A., and that the stealiui^' and reci'iving could both hi- aiU'U'ed to have heeii in A. (2j Where an offonce has lieen committed within 500 yards of the hoiindary between two maf^isterial Jurisdictions, it seems that ( 'lause [b) of Article 5515 will not enable the pro.secutor to lay it in one jurisdiction and try it in anotlier, but it merely gives him tlie option of both laying and Irving the offence in either juris- diction. (;j) With regard to (.'lause {c) of Article 55;j. it seems that, in order to maintain an indictment in a magisterial jurisdiction other tlian that in which an offence has been committed, in resjiect of property in or upon a vehicle or vessel enijiloyed in a journey, etc.. it would be necessary to prove that the offence was committed in or upon the vehicle or vessel itself. For instance, a defendant was held to bail to ap])ear at the Cumberland Assizes to answer a charge of steal- ing committeil on a journey. He had acted as guard of a coach ■ • (1) R. V. Simmonils, 1 Mood. C. C 408. (2) R. v. Hinley, 2 M. & Rob. "^24. (:ij R. V. Mitchell, 2 (4. & Day. 274 ; 2 Q. H. (iSS. IMliiSKl TTIiiN iiF CltlMINAI. OKFENDKRS. — JI'HISItlCTH'N. H!t (Vnrii I'l'iii'illi ill till' (•((uiily of ( 'iiiiilH'i'laiul to KcmkImI in Wot- iiioi'cIiiimI. iiiiil vvit^ •'ii'i'ii^'<'il ^vitli :i hiiiikcr's jmrcd. cuntiiiiiiiiu; hiiiiU iidii's Mini l\vi> sovcri'iii'Ms. ( )ii cliiiiiLfiiii!; horses al smm' ilis- Ijiiict' IVniii I'i'iiritli. lu' carricil tlu' |iarccl to a |>rivv. and wliilc tlit'ic took out nfil 1 lie sovcri'iyiis ; and I'arkc 15.. licld tlial.astlic ;ict of sti'aliiiic was iiol " in oi- ii|ioii tlio foucli." the case was not within llie statute, and the teinny liaviiii!; heeii coiMmilted in West- niorehind. thi'indietnieiit onyiit to he |irefen'ed in tliat county. (1) Clause ic) is not eonliiii'd to the cari'iaii'es of eoninion eari'iei's or to |»uiiiie conveyances, luit extends to any vehicle employed in ;iny journey, (li ) Clause (c) applies to an otl'ence coinniitted in a cafi'iaye of a train niiiniui;- through several Jurisdictions. (!{) A jirisoner was tried at (^uehec and convicted tliere of luan- slauii'hter. lie an<l the deceased had lieeii serviiiir on hoard a British ship and the latter had died, in the district of Kaniouraska. where the -hip was loadiiii;'. from injuries inflicted hy tlu' pri.soner on lioiird tlie ship whih' on the higdi si'as. llild. that ;is the injuries were intlicted at sea. tliat is. witliin the Admiralty Jurisdiction and tlie tleath happeiu'd in the ilistrict of Kamouraska. he should have heon tried in tlie latter district, and not in the district of(^ut'hee. (4) If any otleiice ai,'aiiist the Fisheries Act be committed in upon oi- near any waters t'orniiiii;- the houndary hetween different counties or ilisti'iets. or fishery (list ricts. such offence mtiy he ])rosecuted hetbri' any Justice of the peace in either of sucli counties or dis- tr".'ts. or hefore the tishery oftieer for either of such districts. (5) Kvery offence against the Animal Contagious Diseases Act is. for the i)ur]ioses of pnieeedings under the Act. deemed to have heen committed and every cause of complaint under the .Vet is deemed to liave arisen either in the place where the same actually was (1) Sharpe's Ca.se, 2 Lew. 23:!. (2) R. V. Sharpe, Dpars. 41."); 24 J,. .1. M. ('. 40. (3) K. V. Frencli, s Cox C. (\ 252. (4j 'li. v. Moore, 8 t.1 L. K. » (5) li. S. ('. c. 05, sec ] 7, sub sec. :!. !•(» PRACTICAL mil UK Til .MAOIHTRATEH. corainitti'il or arose, or in any placf in wliicli thf porsoii diurged or conipltiini'd against ha|i|ionH to he. (1) Under the Canadian Government Vessels Discipline Act, any jus- tice ol'tlie jKuico tor the county or district in vvhieh is nituiiled the port where tlie vessel, on hoard of whicli an ott'enee against the provisions of tiie Act has Imhmi eoniinitted, tonehes next after the time of its eoniniission, is given juritidiction over the ofrence. (2) And with regard to offences against Hcctionn 10 & 11 of the Act resjiecting tiie Safety of Ships. Jurisdiction is given to any justice of the jieaee either in (lie place where tlu' otl'enee is coniniilti'd, or, if committed while the steamer is under way, then, in the place where it next stops. (;i) In any complaint, information or conviction under the Dairy Pro- ducts Act 18!K{, the matter coinjilained of may he declared and shall Ik' lu'ld to have arisen at the place where the (diei'se oi* hutler com- plained of was manutiictured, sold, offered, exposed, or had in ])Ossession for sale. (4). In any complaint, information or conviction under the Act against frauds in supjilying milk to (du'cse and hutter nnmufactur- ers, the matter complained of nniy 1k( declared and will he held to have arisen at the |)lace whei-c the mdk com]ilained of was to he manufactured, notwithstanding that the detei'ioration thereof was etfected elsewhere. (5) Nliiiiiiiury Arrt'Nt. — The first paragraph of Article 552 of the criminal code provides that any one found committing an^' of the oHences therein enunu-rated ma}- he ari'csted. withoit WAR- RANT, hy ANYONK ; and tlie following is an alphabetical list of sudi oftences ; Abduction. (Artu-le 281). Administering, taking, or procuring uiUawfnl oaths, (Articles 120, 121). (1) R. S. C c. 69, sec. 45. (2) R. S. C, c. 71, sec. 14. (3) R. S. C, 0. 77, sec. 2(1. (4) 50 Vict. c. 37, sec. 7. (5) 52 Vict. c. 43, sec. 8. SUMMARV ARllKST. 91 Arson, sctlini,' flros, otc. (Articlos 482, -t^iJ, 48-1, 485). Assaults (III the (iiu'oii. (Article 71). .Vtti'iiipt to (lamui^o by explosives. (Article 488). Hciiigat large while under sentenee of" iinprisoiimont, (Article KV.i). lireaUing [irisoii, (Article l(il). bringing stolen i)roporty into (Jauudu, (Article :{55). lireaivini^' place of worship. (Articles 408, 409). ' lUiiglarv. housebreaking, shopbreaking, etc. (Articles 410, 411, Hi'. 4 i:!. 414). r.ciiiij; t'oiiiHl in a dweljiiig by night. (Article 415). I'niui;- finiiid armed with inteiit to break a dwelliiighou8e,(Ai*ticle lltl). Being (lisi^'uised or in jiossession of housebreaking instruments ; (Article 417). Clippinu' ("urreiit coin ; Possessing clippings ; (Articles 4()8, 4'70). ('iiunterfeiting seals : Counterfeiting stam]>s. (.Vrtides 425. 435). ( 'oimlerfeiting gold and silver coin: Making coining instru- ments : and Uttering counterfeit current coin. (Articles 402, 40(). JT7). ('(iiiiiterfeiting cojiper coin. (Article 472). ('iiiiiiterteitiiig foreign gold and silver coin. (Article 473). I letiiing children, (Article 2()!)). • • heniandiug i)y threatening letters, (Article 403). Iicniaudiiig with intent to steal. ( .\rticle 404). . ■» lliidangering ])ersons on railways. (Ai'ticles 250. 251). Kscapes, (Articles 1(;3. I(i4). I'Alortion by threats, (Article 405). Fulsitying Registers, (Article 436). I'iMciliiy compelling executiou of documents. 'Article 402). I'(it'i;ery ; Uttei'ing forged documents ; Possessing forged bank 92 PHACTIfAI. (irillK I'D MAdlSTUATKrt. noti'H ; Uniiij^ prolijilf olitaiiiccl liy toi-gi-ry or perjury ; Miikiiig. luiviiig, nr using t'orgory in«tninu!Mts, (ArlicU'H 42U, 424, 480, 432 Iiiciliiig t(» mutiny. (Article 72). Injuring III' attcnipting to injui'i' ity expioMivos, (ArticleH 247, 248). Injuring elcetric tek-graplis, el<., (Article 402). Interfering with murine signals. (Article 4!tr).) Mur<ler ; Atlemjit to murder; AeccsHory ti> murder. (ArtieleH 2:ji. 2:52. 2;ir)). Manslaughter. (Article 2:^(1). Mi.schiefou railways, etc.. (Articles 48!t. 4itS, VM)). Piracy : Piratical actb ; Piracy witli violence, (Articlen 127, 128, 12!t). Personation. (Article 458). iJiot act. oti'ences respecting reatling of. (Article S;-}). ItiotouH deHtruction : Piotous damage. (Articles 85, 80). Rape ; Attempt to commit rape, (Articles 2(57, 2(58). Keceiving stolen jiroperty. (Article :U4). Hohherv ; Aggravated rol)l)ery ; Assault with intent to roli. (Articles :{<>H. :5il!t. 4(M»). Sto])ping the mail. (Article 4(»1). Suicide. attemi)t at. (Article 2:58). Stupefying in order to commit iudictahle oirence. (Article 244). Treason : Accessory ; 'rreasonalile otlences. (Articles ti5 (17, (58. 6!1, 7<l). Theft hy agent, etc., (Article 320). Unnatural otlences. (Article 174). Wounding. (Articles 241. 242). Wreck. ]ireventiiig escajie from. (Article 254). Wrecking ; A(temi)t to wreck. (Articles 4!»3. 4!t4.) "Found committinu " has lieeii held to mean either seeing tin- party actually committing the otfence or pursuing him immc- SUMMAIIV AUKEHT. O'.i .liaii'lv i>r ii'iitinuoiisly ul'tcr he lias Ik'i'm seen ctiminittiiij? it ; so that !'• juHtify tho iinvst, without warrant, of an ott'cndor. on tin* irroiUKl of liiM licini; found committimj mi oti'cncc. In- must li(« tiikfii in tlu' wry tut of comniittini^ it. or lliiTo nuist ho such frosh ami coiitiiiuoiis pursuit of liini from his lii'lni^ soon and surprisod in tho act until his uctiuil capture, tiiat the liiidin^ him in tlio act and his suhsciiuciit itursuit and capture iimy In- coiisidt^rcd to constituto one transaction. ( 1) " Imincdiatciy means innnedialcly alter tlio commission of tho otfonco, and not inunodiatoly after the discovery of its commission. I'nrsuit after an interval of three hours wouhl not he a fresh pursuit. (2) It seems that if the oft\'nder he seen in tho commission of an otVeiice hv one person, he may hi' ai'i'osted l»y anotlu'i- person who (lid not see him commitliiny it. (3) Clause 2 of .Vrticlo '152 provides that a I'Eack ofkiper may arrest, without warrant, any one found committing any of tlie tulldwiiiij otl'eiices : .Vlteiiipliiii; to injure or poison cattle (Article T)!)!)). ( nu Ity to animals (Article 512). ( 'iitliiii; hooms. or hreakiiii^ loose rafts or ci'lhs of timlior (Article 4!IT). ('iniiilerfeitini^ foreign copper coin (Article 473). K\|MirtiiiL!,' couutorfoit coin (Article 4()5). Keepiiiif cock-pit (Article 513). Ohtainiiin' hy 1'al.se pretence (Article .'J5it). olitainiiii;- execution of valuahh' securities hy false pretence (Article 300). I'ossossing counterfeit current coin (Article 471). I'osscssing counterfeit foreign gold or silver coin (Article 473). A i'KA( K oKFicEK uuiy ari'cst. without warrant, any one whom lie tinds (•(ijiimitting any ott'ence against the ("ode. and anv I'EHSon (1) H. V. Ciirran, 3 C. & P. TO? ; 1 Russ. Vr., 5 Ed., 715; Hanwny v. Boult- hee, 1 M. i\: K. 15. (■-') Downing V. ('ai»l, L. 1{. 2 C. P. 4(il ; Leele v. Hart, 37 L. J. C. P. 157. i;^) H. V. liowarth, R. c»i M., C. (". H., 207. !»4 PRACTICAL GUTDE TO MAGISTRATES. miiy iirrest, without warnint. tiny one whom lie finds by night coni- mittiiig any ott'ence against the (!o(le. (('otU'. Avticlf 55ii. })iU". 3). AN"i' ONE may arrest, without warrant, a pci-son whom he, on reasonable and probable grounds,' believes to have committed an otifenje, and to be e8C'a])ing from and to be freshly i)ursue(l by, those whom the person arresting, on reasonai)ie and probaltle grounds, believes to have lawl'ul authority to ari-est such person (Code, Article 552, par. 4). The OWNER of any property on or in respect to which any person is found committing an ott'ence against the Code, or any jiorson authorized by such owner, may arrest, without warrant, the person so found, who shall forthwith l)e taicen before a justice of the peace to be dealt with according to law. (Code. Art. 552. par. 5). Any OFFICER in Her Majesty's service, any warrant or petty OFFICER in the navy, and any non-cOiMMissioned officer of marines may arrest, without warrant, any person found committing any of the offences mentioned in section ll'J of the (!ode. (Code, Art. 552. par. 6). Any PEACE OFFICER may, without a warrant, take into custody any i)erson whom he finds l^'ing or loitering in any highway, yai'd, or other place during the night, and whom be has good cause to suspect of having committed, or being about to commit, any indict- able ott'ence. and may detain such person until be can be brought i)efore a justice of the peace, to be dealt with according to law. No pei-son who has been .so apjjrehended shall be detained after noon of the following <' ay, without being brought before a justice of the peace. (Code, Article 552, par. 7). The expression ''peace officer" includes a mayor, warden, reeve, sheritf, dei)uty sherirt", sheritt 's officer, and justice of the peace, and also the warden, keeper or guard of a penitentiary and the gaoler or kee])er of any prison, and any police officer, police constable, Itailifl'. constable, or other person em])Ioyed for the preservation and nnuntenanceof the public jjcace, or for the service or execution of civil process (Article 3 s). "Night" is the interval between !» p. m. and (! a. m. of the follow- ing day (Article ;{ q). SUMMARY ARREST. 95 Till' Crimiiiiil I'rocodiuv Act, li. S. ('.. clui]). 174. — section 26 of w liicli cniiH'Wt'ivd persons, to wlioni snoods susjiectcd to bo stolen wvvv otli'ivd for sale or for |):i\vn. to arrest and carry before a jus- tice anv one so ottering. — is now repealed. But the Pawnbrokers' Act. which is still in force, provides, ijy sections 9 and 10, that if anv |)erson otters to any ])a\vnl)rol<er by way of pawn or pledge, etc.. any goods, and is. by giving an unsatisfactory uccount of the goods or otherwise. sus]iected of having stolen or illegally obtained such goods, the pawnlu'oker may seize and detain such person, or anv person trying to redeem ))awned goods to which ho is not entitled, and cari-y him before a justice of the poaoe, who, upon examination and enquiry anil ui)on tinding cau.se to suspect a theft of the gooils. or an attein])t by (he person so apprehended to redeem (idodstd whicdi he is in)t entitled, may commit lum for safe custody, iuid. if lie tind the goods to be stolen, etc.. lie may, unless the otVencc iiulhorizes commitment by any other law. commit the otVender to gaol for any term not exceeding tliree months. riuii r tlie Indian Act. any constable or peace officer may arrest without warrant any person or Indian found gambling, or drunk, or witli intoxicants in Ins possession, on any jtart of a reserve, and may detain him until he can be brought before a justice of the peace, and such person or Indian shall be liable u])on sum- mary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three iiiontlis. <ir to a penalty not e.xceeding tifty tlollars and not less than ten doliai's. with costs of jirosecution. half of whicdi penalty shall lu'long to the informer. (1) Any constable may. witlu)iit warrant, apprehend any j)erson found committing any ofl'ence against the Animal Contagious Di- seases A v\ with I'cspect to infected places, and lake any person so a|ipr('licnded before a justice of the peace to be dealt with accord- ing to law. (li) Jiisfificalioii 4»f' Niiiiiinary Arrest l»y Peace Olii<'<>r ol'SiLspeeteU Ofteiider.— Article 22 of the Code provides that, every ]ieace otticer who, on reasonal)le and probable gro'.Mids. believes that an otfence for which the oflender may be (1) 57-5S Vice. 32, sec. 7. (2) 1!. 8. C, f. (iit, see. 44. 06 I'KACTICAL (iirDK TO MAOISTRATKS. arreeted witliout wavrant has been committed, whether it has been committed or not. and who. on reasonable and ])rol)al)le ujrouiuls, believes that any [lerson has committed that ott'ence, is Justified in arresting such person without warrant, whether sueli person is guilty or not. JiiNtifiration of'PerNoiiN ANfiiii«tin}r Poa<H' Ottict^r to Arri'St ^UHpeet. — Kvery one called upon to assist a peace officer in the arrest of a person .sus])ected of having coinniitted such offence as last aforesaid is justified in assisting, if he knows that the i)erson calling on him for assistance is a jjcace officer, anil does not know that there is no reasonable ground for the suspicion. (Code. Art. 2;i) As the common law justitied a c(mstable in making an arrest witliout wari'ant. upon a reasonable ground of suspicion of a felony luiving been committed, although no felony luid in fact been com- mitted. (1) it was. in .so tar as felonies were concerned, identical with the law as now made api)licable by Article 22 of the Code to the particular offences (enumerated in Article 552), for which offenders nuiy be arrested without warrant. Of course, the grounds of belief upon which a peace officer ads under this ])rovision of the law must, as shown by all the authori- ties in point, be such as woulil lead any reasonable person, acting witliout bias or [»rejudice, to believe the arrested party guilty ol the offence. (2) JiiNtifi<'uti4»ii of NiiiHiiiary Arrest hy Private IndivillualN. — Kvery one is justified \\\ arresting without war- rant any person whom he finds committing any offence for which the offender nuiy be arrested without warrant, or may be arrested when found committing. (Code. Art. 24) If any offence, for which the offender may he arrested without warrant, has been committed, any one who, on reasonable and pro- (1) Beckwith v, Philby, C B. & C. (i35; Davies v. Russell. .'> Bing. ;!5t ; Hogg V. Ward, 27 L. J. Ex. 443; Cowles v. Dunbar, M. L<tM. 37; 2 Oke's Syn. 913. (2) Allen v. Wright, 8 C. & P. 522; Leete v. Hart, L. R., 3 C. P. 3'JJ; Greenwood & M's Mag. G. 2 Ed. 117. jrSTIFICATION OF SUMMARY AllHEST. 97 hiil>lt' i^nmnds. iK'lii-vcs that any person is ,i;;uilty oi'tliat ottonco is justified \\y nrrt'stinL!; him without warrant, whotlior such person is H'liiity HI' not. (("odo. Art. 25/ l';v('r\- one is protected from c.riminnl. responsibility tor arresting wiliiout warrant any person whom he. on rea.souahle and prohable o founds. Iielii'ves lie finds eoininittiniLj l)y night any offence for wliicdi tiie ottender nr-y be arrested without warrant. (Code, Art. 2G). JiiNtifu'atioii oi Arrewt by P(>a<'e Oftieor of* a PorNoii Whom Hv FiiidN C'OniniittinK an Of- lVii<*«*. — I'Ai'ry jieaee offieer is justified in arrestiii/:i; witliout war- rant anv person wliom he finds eoniniit.ting an oft'enct^ ((,'odo. Art. 27) JiikU ligation of* Arrc'st of Pitnoii Found Com- iiiitfiii}>- Any Offence at Bfi{>;lit. — Kveiy one \^ Justified in arrest inii' without warrant any i)er.son whom he finds by night coMiMiittiny any ottenee. 2. I'.vi ly pi'aee otfieer is justified in arresting witliout warrant anv person whom he firuls lying or loitering in any highway, yard (ir other i>lace. by night, and whom he has good cause to susjioet of li:iving conmiitted or being about to commit any ottenee foi" which an olVender may be arrested without warrant. (Code, Art. 28) Arrest l>nrin}r Flight.— i''.veryone is protected from criminal ret^nonsiiility for arresting without warrant any person whom lie, on reasonable and probable grounds, believes to have coiumitteil an offence and to be esea]iiiig from ;ind to be freshly pursued by those whom he, on reasonable and probable grounds, lielicvcs to iiave lawful authority to arrest that person for such otfence. (('ode. Art. 2J»). it will noticed that, in some of the foregoing articles the word ■/usi'iV/er/ " is used, while in others the words iisod are ^' protected from criininnl resjionsUdlity." The different meanings intended to be lonvcvcd by these two exjires.sions are (explained in the following cxiiiict. from the Uoyal Commissioners' report on the Knglish i Matt Code : -There is a dift'ei'onee in the language used in the 98 PRACTICAL tUJIUK TO MAUISTUATES. sections in this i>art wliicli jn-oluilily rt'ciuiivs oxplatiatiou. Somi'- times it is said that ihc person ihjiiiif an art is -justified' in so (loinir under itartienhir eircunislances. The ett'eet of an enaet- ment usin<f that wonl would he. not only to relieve him t'roni punishment, hut also to attbrd him a statntaiiie defenee a-^ainst a eivil action for what he had done. Sometimes it is said that tin- person doin^ an act is ■•protected from criminal responsibility' undci- particular eirenmstanees. The etfoct of an enact ment using this langiuiift' is to relieve liim from ])nnishment. imt to leave his liahility to an action for danuiges to be determined on Other grounds, the enactment neitlier giving a defenee to sucli an action where it does not exist, nor taking it away where it does." statutory Power ot Arrest. — The ('ode jirovidcs that nothing therein contained shall take away or diminish any author- ity given by any Act in force for the time being to arrest, detain or put any restraint on any ])erson. (Code. Art. :^(»)- JiiHtififutioii ol Forc'o iiNod in Arrests. «lro.— JOvery om; justified ov protected from criminal responsibility, in execut- ing any sentence, warrant, or ]»rocess. or in nuiking any arrest, and everyone lawfully assisting him. is justified or protected from criminal responsibility, as tlu' case nmy lie. in using sn(di force as may be neces,sary to overcome any force n.^'ij in ri-sisting sn(di execution or arrest, unless the sentence, processor warrant can ln' execute(l or the arrest cH'ected by n^asonalile means in a less violent manner. ((>)de. Art.:n). This article is ba.sed n]ioii the jirincijile that, as in nniking an arrest or in executing any sentence, warrant, di-der. or jiroccss. a peace officer or other jierson legally anthori/.ed acts under legal command or coiiqiulsiini. he may. if resisted, i-ejicl force with force; and if. in nsing reasonable and necessaiy force to ovi'rcomc resist- ance, the otticer should hajipi'n. in the struggle, to kill the jiersoii resisting or any of his acconqiliecs. he will be exonerated : while, on the other hand, if death should ensue to the otticer or any one assisting liim. the ]iersonsso resisting will be guilty of murder. (1). (1) Fost. 270,271, 318 ; 1 Hale, 494; R. v. Porter, 12 Cox, C. C.444. IHTV (IK I'EltSONS ARRESTING. 99 I>iity ol I'orsoiiN Arr«'Ntiii^;^ — It is tlic duty of ovoiy- onc oxooutiug any process or uan-aiit to have it with him. and to produc'i' it. if required. It is liu' duty of every one arn-stiiiii,- another, whether with or witliont warrant, to i^ive notice, wlu-rc praelicalilc, of tlie ])rocess or warrant under wliieh lie aets, or of I lie eause of arrest. A failure to fultil either of tiie two duties hist mentioned shall not of itself, deprive the person exeeuting the process or warrant. or his assistants, or the per-son arresting, of protection from crimi- nal responsihility, hut shall he relevant to the inquiry whether the proces.s or warrant might not have lieen executed, or the arrest etiected, by reasonable means in a K'ss violent manner. (Code. Art. :{2). l*iM'V('iitili}>: KN<*a|>«' hy Fli}»:lit.— Kvery peace officer proceiMling hi\ 'ully to arrest, witli or without warrant, any jterson tor any otlence for whicli tiie otfendei- may be arrested without warrant, and every one lawfully assisting in such arrest. \s justified, if the ]iers()n to be arrested takes to flight to avoid ai'rest. in using such iorcc as may be necessary to ])revent his esca])e bv such flight , unless such escajie can be ])reveilled by rea.sonable means in a less violent manner, (("ode. Art. 31!) Kvery private pei'son proceeding lawfully to arrest without war- rant any person for any offence f'oi' which the offender may be anvsted without warrant is /;/5^//7>(^/. if the per.s.;n to be arrested takes to Hight to avoid arrest, in using such force as may be neces- sary to prevent his esca])e liy flight, unk'ss such escape can be ))revente(l by rea.><onable means in a less viok'ut manner: Provided. that such force is neither intended nor likely to cause death or grievous hoilily harm. (Code. .\rt. :]\). Kvery one |irocee(ling lawfully to ari^'st any person foi- any cause other than sucli offence as in the last section mentioned is jusUfied, if the pei-son to be arrested takes to flight to avoid arrest, m using such force as nuiy be necessary to prevent his escape by tliglit. unless such escape can be prevented by rea.sonable moans in a less violent manner: Provided such force is neither intended nor likely t<i cause death or grievous b.Mlily harm. (Code. Art. Ha) 100 I'UACTICAI. (il.IDE Ttl MAGISTUATKS. i'rt'voiitliiK Kh«'ii|>o or HoNCiie al'tor ArroMt.— Iahtv OIK' wlu) liiis lawdilly iinvstt'd any iiorsoii tor any oIU'Iict for which tlu- (.mMHU'i- may Ik- arirstiMl without wurnint \s protected from criminal responsibil'tij in usini; siu-li torn- in order to iMrvciit thcn'scuoorosc-uiR'ofthi' jhtsou anrsti'd as he hidicvi's. on irason- ahh' icrouuds. to ho necessary for that iMirposc. (('.xh'. Art. :!»))■ Kvery oni' who has lawfully arrested any jicrson for any cause otlicr than an otlence for wliich the ortendcr may he arrested with- out warrant, is proteded from criminal responsihUitij in usin^r su(di force in order to |)rcvent"his escape or rescue as he I.eliovcs. on rcasonahle gn.uuds. to he necessary for that purpose; Provided tliat such force is neither intended nor likely to cause .leath or ■rrievous hodily harm. (("ode. Art. :5T.) C'lIAJ'TlvH VI II. Prosecution of Indictable Ofkences : CoMi'Ki.i.iNci Aitear- ANCE ; Laying Information : Simmons : Warrants ok Arrest ; Search Warrants. :ilo<leN of Prosecution of IndictabU' «ffoii«t'>« Before the C'ode.— Before tlu> comini,^ into force of the cri- minal c.xU". there were four dirterent modes of proceeding against a person accused of having committed an indictahle ott'ence — ^rs^ hy Uiking him hefore a umgistrate an<l having him committed for trial ; srcond. hv means of an indictment, without heing so commit- ted : third, in the case of homicide, by committal for trial upon a coroners in(iuisition ; nud fourth, hy means of a criminal niform- ation tiled either hy the Attorney-deneral. ex'-#m. or hy the clerk of the Crown, liy leave of a Sujjcrior Court. (1) Present Wodes of Proseention.— No oiu. exeei.t tlu Attoruey-Geiu'ral or some one hy his direction, can now. in any case or" lor anv otfence, jn-efer a hill of indictment hefore tin' .rrand jury, uiiless he has first had the charge investigated hetoiv (1) As to criminal informationa, see Crankshaw's Cr. C. 244-248. I'KUSECUTI(»N OF INDIOTABLK OKKKNCES. 1(11 ;i iiiiiiri"! '"••*' '"■ justici' of tlio poiiCL', and \)vvu IkiuikI ovci' to lirosi'ciitc. or unless he has the written eoiiseiit of a court of criniiiial jurisdietictn, or of the Attoruey-tienerul, or of the court l)c1nn' vvliicli tlie liill of indictment is to he jireferred ; (1) and. as (■riniiiial informations are very rare. and. as no one can now lu' trieil n|ion a coroner's iiuiuisition. (2) the practical result and the ircmral rule is that no one is iniw tried upon an indictment witiitiut a pi'evious preiiminarv enquiry into tlu' change. Iiefore a niiinistrate or justice of tne )>cace. \ortli-W('Nt Territori4'N uii«l Keewatiii. — No i,M'aiid jury is summoned or sits in tiie \orth-West Territories. (3) iKir in tiic District of Keewatin. (4) Coiiipt'lliii); Appearance Bet'ore JiiNticcN. — Kv( TV justice nuiy issue a warrant or summons as hereinafter nuiiliiined to compel the attendaiu'c of an accused person hefore iiiiu. U>v the purjto.sc of preliminary iufiuiry.'in any of the folldwiiii;- cases : (((.) If such |)erHon is accused of having committed in any place whaii'i:er an indictahle ottence triahle in the provinee in which such justirc icsidcs. and is, or is sus|)ected to he. within the limits over wliicli such justice has jurisdiction, or resides oi- is suspected to reside within snch limits ; (i.) It such person, wherevt'r he nuiy be. is accused of having ciMnmitleil an indictahle otl'encc within such limits ; (r.) If su(h person is alleged to have anywhere unlawfully receiveil jiropertv which was unlawfully obtained within such limits ; ('/.) If such person has in his po8se.ssion, within such limits, any stiilen |ir()|ierty. (Code. Art. S")-!). OftViu'CN C'oiniiiitted in C't'rtaiii PartN of Oii- tiirio. — Ail ottenees committed in any of the unorganized tracts 111' country in the province of Ontario, including lakes, rivers. (1) fodo Art. ()41. ('-') Code, Art 642. (31 H. S. ('., c. 50, sec. 65. iM K. S. (',,c. 53, sec. 27. 102 PRACTICAL OUIDK T(l MAdlSTKATKH. and other waters therein, not einltraccd witliiii the limits of any orsfanized eounty. or within any provisional Judicial district, may l>e laid and (diarj^cd to have heen committed an<l may l)e enquired of, tried and punished within any county of su(li jirovinee ; and such otl'cnccs shall l)e within tiie jurisdiction of any court having jurisdiction over oti'ences of tlie like nature committed within the limits of such county, hefore which court such otVences may he prosecuted ; and su(di court shall proceed therein to trial, judgment and I'xecution or other punishment foi' such otl'ence, in the same manner as if such olfencc had heen committed within the county whore sucli trial is had. 2. When any |)rovisional judicial district oi" new county is formed and estahlished in any of such unorganized tracts, all oti'ences committed within the limits of such provisional judicial district, or new county shall he in(]uired of, tried and |)unishcd within the same, in like manner as such olfences would have heen in(|uircd of, tried and punished if this section had not heen passed, ;}. Any person accused or convicted of any ott'ence in any such ])i'()visioiud district may he committed to any common gaol in the ])i'ovince of Ontario; and the constahle or other otiici'r having charge of such jjcrson and intrusted with his conviyance to any such common gaol, may ])ass through any county in su(h province witli such ))erson in his custody ; and the ki'e])i'r of the common gaol of any county in such province in which it is found necessary to lodge for safe keej)ing any such person so hcing couvcA'cd through such county in custody, shall receive such jicrson and safely keep and di'tain him in such common gaol for such period as is reasonahli' or necessary ; and the kecpei' of any common gaol in su(di province, to which any such i)erson is committi'd as afon'- said, shall receive such per.son and safely kee]) and detain him in such common gaol under his custody until dischargi'd in due course of law, or hailed in cases in which hail may hy law lie taken. (Code. Art. 555). ,„ ,,•- OftVncH'S C'Oiiiiiiit'tlMl ill CaaNpe — Whenever any otfence is committed in the district of Gaspe, the ott'onder. if com- mitted to gaol hefore trial, may he conunitted to the common gaol of the county in which the offence was committed, or may. in law, be deemed to have been committed, and if tried before the I'llOHEOUTrON OK INinCTABI.K oKKENf'KH 108 Coiii't of (^lU'cMs Mcneh. lie .shall U' so tried ut tiic Hitting of huoIi court liclil in the eounty to tlio gaol of whieh ho has heeii comiiiittcil. and if iinjjrisoned in the eominoii gaol after trial lie shall lie so iin|M'isoMed in the eoninion gaol of the e.ouiitv in \vhicli he has heen tried. (Code, Art. 55()). OfteiioeN <'oininitto<l out of IflatsiNtratr^M Jiir- iMliffioii. — The preliininarv iininiry may he held either hy one Jiistiee or hy more justiees than one : I'rovided that if the iHciised person is hrought hefore any Justice charged with an ort'ence conimitted out of the limits of the jurisdiction of such jiistiee. siudi justice may. after hearing hoth sides, order the accused at any stage of the iiuiuiry to he taken hy a constahle hefore some justice having jurisdiction in the place where the (itlcncc was committed. The justice so ordering shall give a war- rant for that i)urp()se to a con.stahle, which may he in the kokm A IN scuEDi i.E o.vE of the Codc, (1) or to the like etlcct, and .shall, deliver to such con.stahle the information, depositions and recogniz- ances, ifiiny, taUen under the provisions of the ("ode. to he deliver- ed to the Justice JH'fore whom the accu.sed jier.son is to he taken, and such di'iiosiiions and recognizances shall he treated to all in- tents as iflhcy hail heen taken hy the la.st mentioned ju.stice. 2. Upon the constahle delivering to the justice the wai-rant, information, if any. depositions and recognizances, and proving on oath or artirination, the handwriting of the justice who'^has suhscribed the same, such justice, before whon'i the accu.sed is produced, shall theren]K)n furnish such con,stahle with a receipt or certiticale in the koh.m H m sphkoule one of the Code, (2) of his having received from him the body of the accused', together with the warrant, information, if any, depositions and recognizan- ces, and of his having proved to him. upon oath or altirmation the handwriting of the justice who issued the warrant. .■{. If such justice does not commit the accused for trial, or hold iMin to hail, the recognizances taken before the first mentioned .lustice shall be void. (C^ode, Art. 557). (1) For Form A, see p. 13.^), pofl. (2i For Form H, see p. i:So, poKt. l(Mi PKAOTIOAI. (M'lDK TO MA(USTRATKS. IjayiiiK III lor mat ion. —Any dmc who. upon rciiKoiuililc or iirolmlilf i^rouiids, liclii'vi's (liat iiiiy JJorKon Iuih coiimiittcil iui iii(Uetul)U' otVi'iico ai^iiiiist tlic < 'otio may luako a foniplaiiil or lay an int'oriiiatioii in wi-itintc and undci- oath hcforc an}' niai^i.stratc or jiislicc of Ihi' |»oa('i' haviiiif Jui'isdiction to i.ssuo a warrant or sum- mons a jj;ainsl siicli acciiwd |)(M'Hon in rcMpi'ct of such oft'i'iicc. 2. Sncli comphiint oi' information may Ik- in tlu' koii.h C in sciiKnri.K o\K of tlic ("odf. (I) or to thclii<c ctVcct. (("odo. Art. 55H). Hy ArticU' 5;^t of tin- ('o<U' no civil remedy for any act or omis- sion is to Ik' suspended hy reason ofsu<'li act or omission aniount- in<; to a criminal otU-nee. Tlie information and complaint siiould contain the Informant's or Complainant's name, occupation and address, (2) tlie (hite and jihice of preferring it. with theiuime and stylo of the justice before whom it is laiil or nuide. (;{) and the name and description of tiie ))erson charjfcd. (4) Iftiie Act under whicli tiie proceedings are taken extends only to iJCi-sons of a jiarticular class, ottice. or situation in life, tlie party charged should he shown to conie witliin the description of such persons, hearing in mind the hroad rule, for construing statutes, as laid down hy Lord Tenterden, tliat, 'where general words follow particular ones, the rule is to construe, them as applicaijle to i)ersoii> ejusdem cjeneris. (5) The iirosecutor may ])rosecutc all or any of the parties, and the omission of u partireps criminis cannot, as in casesof joint contracts in civil actions, he taken advantage of !)V tho.se who are prosecute<l. The al)ove Article 55H recpiires the information or eoni|)laint l'< he in writing and under oath, and to he in the form (' in schedule (1) Fpr Form C. see p. 13(), y^os/. (2) R. V. Sione, 2 1x1. Kaym. lo4o. (3) K. V. Johnson, 1 Sir. 261. (4) K. V. Dobbin, 2 Salk. 473. (5) Saiullman v. Broacii, 7 1!. ^ ('. 100. (ti) R. V. Brown, 26 L. J. M. C. 183. I-AYINd ANIl IIKAKINd INI-'CMJMATION. 105 ..lie nftlic Codo or to llu' like clloct ; hiit fonn ('. (Iocs not show liow tlK'oth'iice is to lie (k-scnl.c(|. For »'.\aiii|.k's of tl„. imikmkt orsljilini,' otrt'iiccs. set' |i|). 14.'!. cf ^^^'(^.. post. Thf .lcsiTi|.tion ofllu' cliiifi-v in (1h> iiiforniufioii and i'OMi|.laint siiniild inchidc, in ('xpn'ss terms, every ini,Mvdi..'iit rwiiiin-d hv the slatnle to.— or a statement of facts which— eoimtitiite the ottence (1) It is. however, pn.vided l.y .\rticle 57S <>f' tiie ( 'ode. posr that no irreirniarity or defect in the sub.stance or form of Mie summons or warrant, and that no variatico Ijetwecn the ehiir|L?e contained in I lie sunnnons or warrant and the charjre contained in the information nrhetween i^ither and tlie evidence ad<lneed on the part of tho prusccntion at the en.piiry siiail atiect the validity of the proceed- in->al or suhseqneni to the hearin.ir. The possil.ilily of (aUinir ('■'■iumal ohjections either to the information or com"|)lainl or to tlH' .as,, as made out in the evidence addnced at the preliminary iiiveMi,i;ation of an in.li.Mahle otfenee is thus done away with. '■''"' ii'l'-niiation or complaint in the case of an indictahle ..f- 'n<e is taken merely for the purpose of enahlini,^ the justice to .lud-e whether or not he should interfere, an.l to i-Miid'e his dis- ereiH,!, ;,> I,, the propriety of issuin.ir a summons or a warrant ; (-') so tiiai ;,ncr the summons or warrant issues the inforni- ""<"' '"•.nnipiainl ceases to he of any importance, an.l it neces- sanly f,.ll„us that if the evi.lence taken hefore the justice re- veaUan mdirtahle oilVnce as havin- heen committe.l l.y the party '"" "''"i-TJMvhendod. thoui^h it mav not he the same otlencu as the one ciun-ed in the infonnati.n. ..r complaint, he is h.mnd """'.l"'l"'i>te upon the evidence and to dischariro. hind oyer or -mnnt ,!,.. ,„.,.„sed. as directed hy Articles 57il, 58.J, 5»7, 5<.4 an.l •)•'•). /lOSt. "*'»'•'"«: I II tor mat ion. rpou receiyinic any such '•;;'"l'l"""-"'inf,.rmati,m the justice shall hoar and c.msi.lcrthe ='l;',^^.t,ons of the complainant, and. if of opini.mthat a case tors., 'l'""^- is made out. he shall issue a sunnnons or warra.U, as the case ('I li- V. Kennutn, ! Cl.i.t. Kep. 152: E:v parte Askew, 15 J. P. J85. 106 I'RACTICAI. (il IliK T" M A(MSTKATKS. Jiuvy l>i'. ill iniiiiiu'r li«Tciiiatlt'r iiifiitioiu-d, iiiiil .su(!li Jiislici' sliiill not iTi'iiMi- to issin' siu'li siiiiiintiiis or wiirrimt. only lu'ciiuso tho ulk'^c'tl ort'enco is one (or wliidi an oll'cndci- iiiiiy In- arri'sti-il willi- out warrant, (('ode. Art. r>r)!t) This Article expressly provides that the justice sAr»// hear and consiiier the alle.i^at ions of the complainant. Iielore issiiin/j; a smu- ii'ons or warrant. The siuninons or tlie warrant, as the case may he, should bo issueil liy the nia^'ist rate who hours tin- int')riniition. TMie Courts disapprove of the pi'actice of tho ma,t,'ist rale's clerk hearini,' tho conijilaint ami lillin<;- up the summons oi- warrant and getting it sigm-d hy the mai^istrato, without the latter havini; pi-r.soimlly heard the party comphiinini;. (1) Tlio infonnation should he taken as nearly as possible in the lanirua<;e of the party coniidainiu.u; ; (2) and :i niaj^isti-ate should not place u[ion the eonipiainant's words a legal eonstruidion whicdi t hoy do not boar. If, for instunco, tho complainant's statomont sliows only a civil trosjiass. it should not be construed by the nu\gistrate as an indictable otlenco. nor should he so describe it in the information. (3) If tho infonnation discloses no otVence in law, it will not authorize tho issue of a warrant, us it contains nothing to found the magis- trate's jurisdiction. (4) Mut, if it can. by reasonable intendment bo road as disclosing u criminal otfenco, the rule is to so read it. (5). Thoro are cases, oooasiomilly, in which it nuiy ho thought advis- ablo to issue merely a summtms ; but it is very seldom that this procoss is doomed suttioient upon an information being laid for an indictable otlence. Tho usual course is to issue a warrant of appre- hension. Warrant in C-aNON of tHIVncoH (Joniniitfed on tht' IIIkIi Svt%Hi Ktc— Whenever any indictable otrenco i,s committed on tho high sous, or in any creek, harbor, haven or (1) Dixon v AVells, 2.t Q.B.D. 249. (2) Cohen v Morgan, D. & R. 8. (?)) lUifiers v. llassard, 2 App. Hep. (Ont). ofi7. (4) Stephens v. Stephens, 24 U.C.C.P. 424. 15) Lawrence v. Hill, 10, Ir. C.L.R. 177. i\UltKST OV MISI'lCTKIi DKSKIITEIIM. 1((7 ullicr |ilii(i' ill wliich llic Adiuii-nlil v ol' Kiii,'lniiil Imvc or clniin to lijivc iiii'isiliclioii, and, wlii'iii'vor any oUciicc is (•(.nuuitU'd on hind hcyniid I he seas tor \vhi(di an indictnuMit iua_\- lie |ir«'f'on-n(l. or tho oUciidcr may lie arrcsti'd in Canada, any Jiistifi' lor anv tfrritorial division in wliiidi any person (dnu'i,'i'd with, or,siis|)('<'t»'d (d', havinij coniniiltccl any snidi (dU'iifc is or is suspci-tt'd to he, niav issnc luH warrant, in iUv form D in schedule one of the (!odo, (1) or to the lil<c cllfcl. to a|i|>i'(diend sindi |ter.son, to he dealt with as hci-ein and hcrehy direeled. (('o(h'. .Vrt. 'idO). As lo otlences eoniniitted willun tlie jnrisdiclion of the .Vdmir- idiy. see eomnients and authorities at jiji, 72-77.. an^e. .il'IM'N* 4»f Nll.S|MM't4Ml I»«'N«>r<«'rN.— Every one who is ivas.nial.ly suspected of heini,' a deserter from ITer Majesty's sor- vier may he apinehenih'd and hrou;--lit for examination liefc'ire anv JMsiice of the pcaee, and, if ita|)i)ears tinit he is a deserter, he sjiall l>e euntined in o'aol until chiinied hy the ndlitary or naval anthori- lies, nr |ir()cee(|e(l au;ainst aeeordini;- to law. -'• ^'' fsliidl hrealv open any huildint,' to sear( h tor a deserter, iihless he liasohiaiiied a warrant for that purj.ose from a justice of I lie peace.— such Warrant to he founded ..n atlidavit tliat there is ivasiiM to I.elicve that the deserlei" is concealed in sueh huiidin^-, and thai adiiiittanee Inis heen demanded and nd'nsed ; {•>) ainl every one who resists the execution of any sutdi warrant shall iiKur a penalty of ei.odity (hdlars. reeoveral.le (.n summary con- victiiMi HI like manner as other penalties under the Code Vcode • An. r)iil., ^ ' roiiiviilM or .SiiinnioiiN.-Nervu.<'.— Kverv summons is.sue(l hy a justice under the ( 'ode shall hedirected to the aeeiised, i'Hd shall re,piire him to appear :.t a lime and place to he therein ""nli"iied. Such summons may he in the form K i.v .schkhulk o.sk "'■ t '"■ < '.'de. (;{) or to the like idfeet. No summons shall be signed ui I'link. (1) I'or Form I), see p. 137. pnsl. (•-') Korform of inloimalion to <,l)taiM u search warrant, .so^ n 140. post. ['■'<) I'or Forni E, see p. 137, ),nM. jog I'ltAITlCAI, (illDK T" MACISTRATES. 2. Kvcry such suiuimoiis shall lu' scnvd l.y a coustiihk' or other iR.act" otti(Vr iii.oii thi- iK>rsou to wlioiu it is (lirocti'<l. I'itht-r by (K'livcriui;' it (.. liim iicrsoiially. or. if such pcrsou i-anuot con- vcMiienth'lH. uu't with, l.y Icavi.i- it lor him at his last or most usiuU i.'lai-c ot al.n.k.. witli sonu' iunuitc ih.n'i'oW apparently not under sixteen years of (Hje. :j Tlu' service of auv such suunnoi.s uiay he proved l.y the oral fstinumv of the pers,m elle.-tiu- the sau.e or hy the alli.lavit of such i.erson imrportiii- to he lua.le hefore a justice. (Code. Art. This article re.,unvs that service shall he etVected hy deliveriu.o- the su.umous itself to the party personalU/. or hy leaviu- the sauu' :„ Lis last or most usual i-lace of ahode. with s..iue luinate thereot apparently not under sixteen y.'ars of a,!i;e. Where the service is ..tlected hy leaviu-.- the su.uuuu.s will, •n.other person, the coustahle must tell the person wit h whom he leaves it that i; is tor the defendant, and the jierson with whom liicsmnmonsis left should he .nade to- understan<l the nature .,1 it.(l) The words •• last or most usual place of ahode - uu'au the parly s pveseut place ni aho.le. if he has any. au.l the last place of ahode whicdi lie had if he has ceased to liave any. (2) The dclivry -d' the sninm.Mis to a person oii^ the premises upiuirently residin- there as a servant is sutlicient. (3) ■The service ..fa notice, under the " Public llealtli Act." 11 i 12 Vic (imp), c. .;:;. upon a clerk at the ottice ..f the ••owner, where the owner carried ..n his husiness. was hehl to he a servin- upon ■• some inmate of his place of abode. - un.ler section 1..0 ot that . Act. (4) ' ;.. Uaiiaiii i» \ryvHi In th*' Fi»Nl l..«tai.*t - Tlu warrant issued hv a justice for the api.reh.M.si..ii of the i.ers..., a...ainst whom an infornialion or complaint has heeii laid. n. (1) i?x/;(ir/t Smith, oil . I. !'• (.1-1- (2) Ex parte lJi(v, .tones, I L. M- i*^ I'- •''•">'• _ . ■ (3) R. v. Cliandler, 14 East, 'JeT. (4) Maton v. Ihhhy, i. h T. N. S. .W2; ;!P. L. .h M. C. S5. BXKCVTIOX OK WAKKANTS. 10!) |ii-ii\i(l(M| ill scctii)ii five liiiiidird and Hfty-«'iiflit. may ho in the Foiui F i.v sciiEULir.E ONE of {\\v ( \nU'^ (!) or to (lio liivi' t'tt'ect. No such warrant shall be signed in blank. •1. Kvfiy sucii warrant shall he nndiT llie hand and seal of the Justice issninir the sainc. and may he directed, cither to any constahle hy name, or to such eonstahle. and all other eonstahles within the territorial Jurisdiction of the Justice issuinij it. or H-eiieraily to all eonstahles within such Jurisdiction. :;, The warrant shall state shoi-tly tlie ott'enee for wliich it is issued, and sludl name or otherwise deserihe tlie ott'ender. and it shall order the otticer or otticers to whom it is diivcted to ai'iu'elieiid the olfender and hrinu; him hefore the justice or justices issuing- the warrant, or hefore some other justice or justices, to answer to tlu' charire contained in the sidd information or coiii|ilaint. and to he furlhei' dealt with aecordiii(r to law. It shall not he necessary to make such warrant returnahle at auv IMriieular lime. I.ut the same shall renmin in force until it is e.Xcculed. I. The fact that a summons has heen issued shall not prevent any Justice from issinni,^ such warrant at any time hefore or after the time nientiniied in the summons for the a|i])earance of the accused ; and. where the service of the summons has heen jn-oved. aiul the accused does not appear, or when it apjjcars that the summons cannot he served, the warrant (foum (i) mav issue (•>) (<'o(le. .Vrt. r)(;;i) F.:«o<'iitioii of U'arrjnitN.— Hvery sued, warrant may !"• <xecuted hy anvstino- the accused, wherever lu' is lound in |1"' "'n'ilofial jurisdiction of the Justice hy whom it is issued, or III the ease ollVesj, pursuit, at any jjlace in an adjoinin;.- territorial 'livision uitl, in seven miles <d' the hor.ler of the first -n.enth.ned ili\ i^ioii. -'. Kvery sueli warrant may heexe.aited hy anv consfahle named "'"■'■'•I'l- "!• hyan\ one ,.f the eonstahles to whom it is .lirected, (1) I'or Form F, see p. 138, ,,oH. (-') Fer Form G, see pj.. 138, 139, poH. For form ,.f dep.sition provini; service „l .summons, see p. ) 41 , ;)o.<!/. \ 110 rUACTICAl, (JlIliE TO MAGISTRATES. whi'Mu'v or not tlu' pliict' in wliicli it is to lie oxcoiited is witliiii tlic place I'oi' \. . ic'li he is constaliic 3. Evoiy warrant authorized liy tlu- Code may he issued and executed on a Sunday or statutory holiday, (("ode. Art. 564) The exprossiDO •holiday" includes Sundays. Xew Year's l)ay. the Kpiphany. (iood Friday, the Ascension. All Saints' Day. .Con- ception Bay, Easter Monday. Ash Wednesday. Christmas J)ay, the liirtiiday (or the day iixed ly proclamation for the celehration ol the liirthday) oi' the reigning Sovereign. Dominion Day, Lahor Day, (first Moii(h>y in Se|)teml)ei'). and any daj' appointed ly pro- chimation tor a gei"'ral fast or thanksgiving. (1) The ])olice have a right, under a warrant for the arrest of a per- son (duirged with stealing goods, to take |)osseession of the goods ; and any ]n'()|)erty found in the ])Ossession of a person arrested for an indictalilc otl'ence may. — if helieved to have heen used foi- the ])urposi' of committing the ott'enee, — Ijo seized and detained as evidence in supjiort of the diarge. (2) A warrant issui'd under the Extradition Act may lio executed in any ])art of Canada, in the same manner as if it had heen originally issued, or suhse([uently endorsed, hy a justice of the peace havini;' juris(iietion in the jjlace wliere it is executed. (;5) and everythinu' found in the possession of the fugitive at the time of his arrest which may he material as evidence in making proof of thecrinu', may i)e delivered up with tlie fugitive on ids surrender, suhject lo all rights of third pi'rsons with regard thereto. (-I-) A fugitive ottender accused of having committed an otl'ence in some part of Her Majesty's dominions outside of Canada may W apprehended in Canada uudt'r an endorsed warrant or a provisional warrant. (5) A Magistrati' in Canaila may issue a jjrovisional warrant for tlio apprelu'usion of a fugitivi^ who is or is suspecteil of heing in or en his wav to Canada, on such inforniation and under sui..i circuiii- (1) R. S. C.,0. l.sec. 7, par.26;r)6 Vic, c.ao.eec. I ; 57& 5S Vic, c55. ser, I. (2) Dillon v. O'Brien, 16 Cox, 245. (3) K. S. C, c. 142, EBc. 7. (4) Jb.. sec 18. (5) K. S. C, c 143, sec 4. As to endorsed warrants, see pp. 115, 116, /*"■•/. EXECUT£i»N OF WARRANTS .lUSTIFIEn. Ill stiiiiccs as \vi)iil<l. ill liis opinion, jiistity i'k' issiu' of a warrant, if the oIli'iHi' of wiiich the fugitive is iiceusad liad iici-n t'ommitted wiliiiii Ills jurisdiction : and su(di warrant may in' lia(d<t'd and cxccutfd ac<'or(iini,d_v. (1) FiXOi'iifioii oT I-.awfiil Process JiistifitMl. — Kvory niinisti'i-iai otHoi-r of any court duly autliori/A'd to execute any lawful process of sudi court, whether of a civil or criniinal nature, and every iierson lawfull}^ ussiHting him, is jwsf'l/jerf in executing the >ianie -. and every gaoler who is required under such process to receive and detain any person is justitied in receiving and detain- iiiii- liiin. (Code. Art. Iti ) KxiHMitioii oflitiwriil Warrants <Tiistifi<'4l. — Hvery one duly aulhori/.ed to execute u lawful warrant is.sued l)y any court or justice of the i)eace or other person having Jurisdiction to issue su(di warrant, and I'very ]ierson lawfully assisting him. is justijicd ill execiUiug siuli warrant ; and every gaoler who is re- quired under siudi warrant lo receive and detain any per.son is Justin'ed 'u\ receiving and delaiiiing him. (Code, Art. 17) Where, upon warrants iicing issued for tiie arrest of parties accused of having committed an otVence in one county, pcr.sons from another comity came to assist the constahles of the county avIumv llu' otfence was committed in making the arrests, the per- sons so assisting were held cut il led tu the saiae protection as the consiaiiles. (2) Kx<M'iitioii 4>l* fr^rroiiouiis Koiitciice or l*roc<>ss Jlistifiod. — If a sentence is passed or jirocess issued hy a court liiiving juri.sdiclion under any circumsiances to jiass such a sen- teiici' or i.ssue such |irocess. or if a warrant is issued hy a court or pri'MMi Iniving jurisdiction under any circumstances to issue such a wiinanl. the .sentence passed or process or warrant issued shall he siillicieiit {(> Justifi/ tho offii-or or per.son authori/,e<l to execute the le. and every gaoler and person lawfully assisting in executino- larryiiig out such .sentence, process or warrant, althougli the irt passing the sentence or issuing the process had not. in the (1) //'., sec. 0. '-M U. v. Cliassen, 3 Pugs. 546. 112 I'UACI'KAI, (illDK I'd MAGISTRATES. pai'ticiilar rasf. iuUliority In pass ilic scntfiicc or td issue tlic |ii'i)- cess, or altliougli tlu' (.-oiirt. justice or other person in the particular case had no jurisdiction to issue, or exceeded its or his Jurisdiction in issuiiii;- the warrant, or was. at tiic time when sucii sentence was |iassed or process or warrant issui'd. out of the district in oi- tor which sutdi court, justice or person was enlilled to act. (('oih'. Art. 18.) In their coninients upon sections of the Hni^lish Draft (.'ode ot the same import as tlie foren'oinn" Articles l(i to IS. tlu' Ko_\al ( 'om- niissionei's say: ■ 'IMie result ot' tiie anthovitii's justities us in saviny,- tiiat whcrexer a ministei'ial otticer. who is hound to ohey t he orders of a court or maii'isi rate. (as. for instance, in exi'cutinn' a sentence or etlectiuif an arrest under warrant), and is punishahle hy indict- ment for disohedience. merely oheys the oi'der whitdi he has re(-n'i\'e(l. he is Justified, if that order was within the Jurisdiction o| tlu' i)erson ii'iviny it. And we fhiid\ thai llu' authorities show- that a miinsterial otticer oheyinii; an order of a court or the war- rant of a maii'istrate. is ju->tifi('<l if the order or warrant was one whi(di the court (U' nuiiiistrali' could umU'r any circumstances law- fully issue, thoiiii'h the order or warrant was. in fact, ohtaiiied iin]>roperly. oi- lhoUi>-li there was a tlefect of Jurisdiction in the particnlar cast.' whi(di miii'ht make the magistrate issuini'' the war- rant civilly responsihlc. on the plain primiple thai llie nnni>teri;il otticer is not liound to omiuire what went the n'rounds on whi(li the order or warrant was issued, and is not to Idame for acting- on the supjiosition that tlu' court or nninMslrate had Jurisdiction." Wll«>1l fiX4M*llti4»1l 4»r M«>llt«'1IC*(' 4»l* l*ro<*4'NM Witli- 4»llt •llll*iM4li4'ti4»ll is ■*r4»t4'4*<4'4l. — I'lvery ollicei'. i;'ao|er. or |K'rson executiuij;- any sentence, process or warrant . and every |iersnii lawfully assisting such otHcer. gaolei'or |)erson shall \)v protected from criminal responsibiliti/. if he acts in good faith, under tlu' heli(d' that the sentence or process was that of a court having Jurisdiclion. or that the warrant was that ol a court, justice of tlu' peace, or otlni' pei'son having authority to issue warrants; and if it 1k' proved tlnit th«' person jyassing the sentence or issuing the jiroct'ss actcil us such a court under color of having some a|ipointnu'nt or com- mission lawfully autliori/.ing him to ai't as sucdi a (M)urt. or lliat the |ierson issuing the warrant acU'il as a justice of the peace 'H' AltKESTINCi TIIK WKiiM; I'KUSoN. 1|;; otluT i>crsi)ii li;iviiin-siich iuit liorit y. ail Imuii'li. in fact, sudi a|iii(iint- iiiciil (If ciiiiiniissioiMliil 111)1 oxisl.or liail cxiiirt'd. or alllioiin-li. in lad. ill!' ctiiiil 'ly till' jK.'r.'^on passinii,- llic srHtcncc or issniny liio |iro('i'ss was not tlic court ov tlic |)crson aullnifizc(l liy tin' coniniis- sion to act. or tiu' jicrson issuing' tiic warrant was not duly autlmr- i/,c(l so to ad. (Code. .\rt. lit.) It will lie seen tliat Article IS prolcds an otliccr who executes llie sentence or warrant of a court or |iei'>^on haviui;- Jurisdiction, ii;eiierally sjieakiuii'. luit actiuii'. in tlie pai'ticular case in Inmd. eitlici' witliout oi- in excess ol' sutdi Jurisdiction, oi- outside ot' liis oi- its district ; and tliat Article I'.t protects an otiicer in executiui;'. in ii'odd t'aitli.a sentence oi- warrant which lu' helieves has licen jiassed nv issued liy ^ui h court, or |icrson under some color of lawful authority. In c<ininieiitinii- iijioii the latter clause t he i-jii^'lish c<unniissioner.s say ; • Though cases ot' this sort ha\'e rarely arisen in |)ractici'. wo think we are Ju>lilied iiy the opinion of Lord ilale(] [lak'.4it8) in sayihii,- that the ordei' of a court, haviiiii' a coloi- oi' jurisdiction, thdiiijh acting erroneously, is enough to justify the ministerial otiicer. " .ii'iM'NiiilK' lli4> \%'roil{r Pei'NOil.— Mvery one duly autliori/.e(| to execute a warrant \o arrest, wiio thereupon arrcNts a person, iielieviug. in ^-ood faith and on ivasonable and prohahle grounds, that he is the person named in tlie warrant. >hall lie protected froin criminal, respomilnliti/ to tlie same extent and sulijed to the same |irovision as if the person arrested had heeii llie |iei'>(iii named ill I he warrant . I'lvery iiiir called on to assist the person nuiking sucdi arrest, and I'l'iieving that llie person in whose arrest he is called on to assist is ihe person for whose arrest the warrant is issued, and every Uirnlcr who is iv.piired to receive and detain such |)er.son. shall ho i'rutcdod. to the same extent and suhjoct to the .same provisions as 'I ilie arrested person had lieen the jierson named in the warrant. (' ' .\i'l. I'd. ) llii> .\rticle ot' the Code made an important (diaiige. \W tho c<>iii!!i-i. law. if an otiicer. having a warrant for ono porson. ar- rested an.. ilier. the anvst was illegal and unjustitiahle. Kor instanoo, I 114 PHACTICAI. lillDK Tii MAdlSTRATES. ill OIK' case.;! nuiu^istratc issiu-d a warrant n\H>\\ a criiuinal diarize against a man wlio was (U'scrilu'd in tlio warrant iiy the name of John H. IJiuU-r lliis warrant llic (•(iiistai)l(' arrcstcil lliciiai'd II.; and. altliongli till' man so arrest im I was. in reality. I lie person against whom tile warrant was intendi'd. and was pointed out as sncii to the constahle liy tin.- prosecutor, wiio supjiosed tiie man's name to be Jolin II.. Mr. Justice Coltnian directed the jur}-. and his ruling was afterwards npiield. that a person conhi not lie lawfully taUeii under a warrant desei'ihing liim l>y a name that did not heloiig to him. unless he hail assumed or called himself liy tlu' wrong name. (1) Of courst', as a constahle could always a|)|»rchcnd. without war- rant, any oni' suspcctt'il on ri'asonalile grounds of ha\ing committed a felony, he was ahle to justify an arrest on that ground, although he had a warrant which happened to he illegal. (2) The ri'marUs of the I'higlish commissioners in support of a simi- lar clau.se in their Draft Code aiv as follows: •• Tliis is new. As an otiici'r ai'resting foi- felony without warrant is hy the common law justitied. even if he, hy niistaUe. arrests the wrong person, we think that tlu' one who arrests any person with a warrant for any otfcnce shall at least he protected from criminal I'cspon.sihilify. The right of action is not atfected hy it."' Irr«'}>;iil»r Warrant <*v ProocsN. — Kvcry one acting undci' a wai-rant or process which is liad in law. on account of Home defect in suhstance or in form apfiarcnt on tlie face of it. if he. in good faith and without culjiahle ignorance anil negligence, believes that tlu' wan-ant or proeess is good in law. shall he pro- tected from crivdi'ttl resjionsibiUty. to the same extent and suhj<'ct to the sann' provisions as if the warrant or ]»rocess wiu'c good in law, and ignorance of the law shall in such case he an excuse : providcil that it shall he a (|Ui'stion of law whethei' the tacts of which there is evidence may or may not constitute ctdpahlc ignorance or negli- gence in his ,so helieving the warrant or pi'oeess to hi' good in law. (Code. Art. 21.) (1) Hoye V. Bush, 1 M. iS: Gr. 77.'), 780. 1 Rnss. Cr., otli F,d., 738; R. v. Hood, \{. ik M. C.C. K. 281. (!') Hoye V. Bush, . M. & Gr. 775, 780. I'UncEEDINdS IMlElt EN'DDUSEI) WAHIIANTS. Uf) III I'd'crcnci' ti> this claiiM tlu- Kiii>'lisli coinmissiiMicrs say : "It. is ill Ifiisi ijiiiiliU'iil. oil tlu- cxistiiii;' autlioritics. wiictiici' a piTson Ii()ii('>li\ arliiii'' iiiiiit^r a iiad warraiil. (Ict'i'ctivf on tiir ta<'i' i>t' it, lias aii\' (icCi'iKT. tli()iifz;li doiiii;- only what would hnvv honn Iuh iliitv it' tlu- warrant was ijood. Tlii' section as tranu'd protects him. 'riic proviso is new. hut .seems to lie reasonahle. Jt does not toucli the (piestion of civil responsibility." l*iMM*«'«>diii^N Wli«'ii IIro OftViiflcr is not Within flic «lllNti('<'*M JliriMlictioil. — If the per.soa a>>'ainst whom aiiv warrant has hecn issued cannot be found within the jurisdiction of liie jiistice by whom the .same was i.ssued. but is or is suspected to lie in any other part of Canada, any justice within whose juris- diction he is or is suspected to be. upon pi'oof bi'ing luadi' on oath or atlirniation of the handwriting of the justice who i.s.sued the same, shall niaUe an endorsement on the warrant, sii^ned with his name, authorizing the execution thereof within his jurisdiction ; and such endorsement shall be sufticient authority \i> the person luiniiini; sucli warrant, and to all other persons to whom the same was oriu'lhidly directed, and also to all constables of the territorial divi>ion w iiei'e the warrant has been so endorsed, to execute the .same llici'eiii and to carry the per.son against whom the warrant issiieij. when a|ij)reheiuled, bid'ortMlu' justici' who isstu'd the Wiir- rioil. or hetore soiui' other justices for the same teri-itorial division. .Sueli endorsement may be in the fohm il in sciikim i.k onk of the Code. (]) (Code. Art. 565). iliK|»4>Mal of'l*«'rMoii ArroNtcd on KndorMMl ivar- railt. -If the jirosecutor or any of the witnesses for the j)rosecu- lion are in the territorial division where such jierson has been api)re- liiiiilnl u|ioii a warrant endorsed as provided in the last preceding section, the constable or othei' person or persons who have appre- liemled him nuiy. if so directed by the justice endorsing the warrant, take iiiin before such justice, or before .some other justice for the same lerritoria! division; and the said justice nuiy thereupon take the examination of such ]»i'osecutoi' or witni'sses. and proceed in I'very lesjiect iis if he had himself issued the warrant. (Code. Art. 506). (1) For Form H. see p. 13tt, poxt. 11() I'UACTII'AI. (illDK T.I MAOISTKATKS. W l*r4»«'«'«Mliii^;N ill t'aiiiiKlii 4»ii warruiii ImmikmI l<ilM«'- ill«'l*«'.- W'lu'iu'vcr ii Wiirranl liiis lici'ii issucil in ;> purl d' Hit .Miijfsly's (loiiiitiidiis lui' tlu' iiiiprt'lu'iisioii of a t'liifitivt' from tliiit |iiirt who is. or is siis|i('ct('(i lo he in or on tlic Wiiy to ('iiiuKln. tlu) tJovci'noi'-di'nci'iil or ii Jiidj^c of a court, if satisH('(| l lial I lif warrant wasissni'd iiy sonic person liaxini;,' lawfnl ant liorit y to issue t lie same, may indorse sncli wai'rant in manner provided liy tiie Fu</ifive Offenders .1'7. and llie warrant so indoi'sed sliail lie a sutlieient avitliority lo appridiend the fui^itivi' in Canada and iirini;- liim lie- fore a ma.iiisl I'ale. (1) .\ii endorsement ot a wari'anl. in pursuance of tli<' Fugitive Olf'enilers Act. must lie sii^ned liy the autiiority cndorsiuii; llic same, and it authorizes all or any of the ])ersons mnned in the endorse- ment and all or any of the persons to whom the warrant was oriirinally directed, and also eveiy constalile. to e.\ecute t he wari'ant within Canada hy apprcdiendiny the piu'son named in it. and liring- ing him hefoi-e a maf^istrate in Canada, whetlu'r lu' is the niaii'is- trate named in tiii' indoi'seineut or sonic other. (2) Itriiig-iiiK' Arr«>Nl«Ml l*«>rMon BcIoim' a Jiiistioo. — When any pei'snn is arreste<l upon a warrant, he shall, except in the case jn'ovided foi" in .\rti(de i'UUi. lie lii'onn'ht . as soon as is practicalile. Iielore the justice who issued it or some other justice for the same terril<iiMal division, and su(di justice shall either proceed with the iiMpiiry or postpone it to a future time, in which latti'r case he shall ei; her commit the accused person to proper custody, or admit him to hail, or permit him to lie at larii'e on his own re- eon-nizauct'. accor<lini!,' to the provisions hereinalter contained. (Coile. Art. rxiT). Coroiior*« lii<|iiiNiiioii.— Kvery coroner, ujion apy iu- <)uisitioii takt'ii liefore him. whendiy any ]K^rson is (duu'^;ed with nuuislaujfhter or murder, shall (if tlie jier.son or ))ei'sons. or either of them, atfecti'il hy stndi verdict oi' tindiiii:; he not already (harifiMl with the said otl'ence he fore a mayist I'ati' or justice), hy warrant under his hand, dii'eet that such person he taUen into i-ustody ami (1) K. S. C.c. 143, sec. 5. (2) Ih. sec. 14. SKAIU II WAItKANTS. ( i KN Kit A I.I.Y. 117 lie I'Diivc'vcil. witli iill coiivfinciit speed. In'torc ii iiiiii^nst rut r or Jus- tice : or siieli enroiier iiiiiv direct siieli |iers(iii to t'liter into a reciiniiizMiiee lielnre liim. witli of witlioiit ii surety or sureties, to ;i|i|ieiir iielore II iniiii-ist riile, or justice. In either ease, it siudl lie the diitv t'l' the coroner to triiiisinit to sueli maii'istnite or justice, llie lU'liositioiis taken hefore him in I lie matter. I'poii aii\ sik h person lieiiiii; lii'oui^ht or ai»peariiin' liefore any such ma.ii'istrate or justiee. he shall pi'ocv'ed in all nspi'ctsas tluuinh siicii per.son had liceii hroiiy'hl or had appeared het'ore him upon a warrant or suiu- iiioiis. (( 'ode. Art. TidS) \ii one can now he trie(l upon a coroinu's iii(|iiisition. (('ode. .\rl. (IPJ). Noai'4'li warraiilN. €ir«'ii«'r«II,v. .Vny justice wiio is salisticil hy iiil'oriuation upon oath in tiie i'ok.m .1 in sciiKuri.K o.nh; III' liie ('ode. (1 ) that thort^ is re!is()nul)le <>;round for hclievinn' that there i- in any huildinu;. reeejitacle. or place — ((() aiiythinn' iijioii or in resjieet of \vhi(di any otienci' against the Code has heeii or is suspected to have heeii commilted : or ih) any! hini^' which tluu'e is reasonahle tfround to helii^xc will allord evidence ;is to the e(uiiniissioii ol'aiiy sindi otl'emH' : or ((•) aiiythiiiii' wlii(di t Ihu'i' is reasonahle n'round to helieve is in- tended to he used tor the purjiose ofcominittinu' any otlence ai^'ainst the person for whicdi the otl'i^nder may Ik- arrested without warrant, —may at any time issiio a warrant uikUu' his hand aiit liorizin<r siiiiie rn\\~.\n\,U'. or other person named therein, tosearcli smdi huildiii<if, iMTcptai'le or piacl^ for any siudi thiiiif. and to seize and carry it 1 let ore llir justice issuiiiir the warrant, or some other justice for the same territorial division to he hy hiiu dealt witii accordinii' to law. -. I'lvcry searcdi warrant shall he execiiti'd. hy day. unh'ss the justice shall hy the warrant authori/,e the eonstahh' or ot her pers(ui to execulr it. at niii'hf. • , , .'). I'lvery search warrant may he in llie kokm I in sciir.mi.K onk. of the Code. (2) or to tlie liUe etiect. (I) For form J, see p. 140, pnH- (■-') For Form I, see p. I Id, pout. lis PIIAOTIOAI, (lllltK IM MAOISTUATKS. ' 4. Wlii'ii iiiiy siicli tliiiiii; is seized ami in'oiiiclil Iteture >iieli Jiislico. lie iiiiiv (letiiiii it. talviiiif reiis(iiiiil)le cure tn preserve it till tlie coii- clusioii i>\' I lie ill vest igatieii ; and. if aiiv nne is ediinnilled I'ur i rial, lie may order it rurtiier to lie delaiiieil for tin? |ini'|iose of evidence on the trial. If no one is coinniitted. die justice sliall direct such tliini!; to lie re>*ore(| |o I lie iii-rsoii from \vli<»m it was taken, except in tlie cases iie.\l liercinafler nieiilioiied. unless lie is autliorized or rc(iuire(l liy law to dispose of it ollierwise. in ease any ini|irovi'd arm or ammunition, in respect to which any otfiMice under section one hundred and si.\tecii has hcen committed, has lieen sci/A'd, it Hhaii lie foi'l'citi'd to 1 he ( 'rowii. 5. if. iMidei' any such warrant. I here is liroun'hl, lieforc any justice, any forifed hank note, hank note-paper, instrument or other tliiiii;'. the jios.session whereof in tlieahsence of lawful excuse isan ott'encc undei' any jn'ovision (d'the Code, or of any other. Act. the court to wliicli any such person is coniniiltcd for trial or. if there is no commitment for ti-ial. such Justice may causi' such tliiiii;- to hi' de- faced or destroyed. t). if. under any sucli warrant, there is hrou<rlit hefore any Justice, any counti'rfeit coin (U- other tliiiii;; the possession of which, with liiiowledge of its nature and without lawful excuse, is ;in indictalile otlenc(' underany jirovision of I'art XXXV. of the ("ode, (l)every such thinir. as soon as it has liccn product-d in evi<lence. or as soon as it appears that it will not he reciuired to he so jii'oduced. shall forthwith lie defaced or otherwise disposed of as the Justici' or the court directs. 7. I'lvery ]iersoii actiny- in the execution of any sucli warrant may seize any explosive suhstanct' whicii lie has i^ood cause to suspect is intended to he used for any unlawful ohject, — and shall, with all convenient Hpecd. after the seizure, remove the same to such proper place as he thinks tit. and detain the same until oi'dei'cd hy a Judge of a Superioi- Court to restori' it to tlu' person who claims the sanu'. H. Any explosive suhstancc so seized shiill, in the event of the person in whose jjosscssion the same is found, or of the owner thereof, heing convicted of any oft'enee under Part VI. of the (1) Part XXXV of the Code deals with offences relating to the Coin. SKAUCll WAIUIANTS. UKNKIIAM.V. ll!t Codt', ( 1) I"' I'orl'fitc"! ; ami tlic same sliall iKMlcHd-uycd or hoM iiiiili'i- till' iliri'flioii of lilt' roiirt lu'lon- wlildi such in'i'soii in I'on- \ii.|,.,|, jiiiii. ill llic case of sail', tlic |iroctH'(l.s arisiiiif llitM'cfrom ^liidl 111' paiil lo till' Minister ol' Finaiicc and iiccfivcr (Jcncral, foi- ill,' |iiil)lic uses of Canada. '.I. If olfi'iisivc wcaiMHis. Iiclii'vcd lo he daiii;'i'i'on.s lo I lie inililic iicacf. iirr st'i/.fd under a search warrant, t lie same shall he kepi in safe (UstddN- ill such [daee a-- l he justice directs, unless t lie owner thereof proves, lo llu' .satisfaclion id' such Juslice, that sindi idfen- sive weapons were not kept for any purpose (lan.!j;eriMis to the piiiilie peace : and any iierson from whom any such otfeiisive wea- Mdiis are ^o taken may. if the justice of the peace upon whose warrant the same are taken. u|ioii application made for that pur- pose, refuses to restore I he same, apply to a Jiidi^'e of a superior or (■iiuiit\' court for the restitntion of siudi olfeiisivi' weapons, upon i^ivini;' ten days' previous notice of siudi application to siuh Jus- lice : and such Judii'e shall make such ordei', for I he rest it ut ion or safe custody of such olVeiisive weapons, as u[ioii such ajiplieation appears to him to he proper. III. If o-oods or thiiiii's hy means of which it is suspected that an (ilVenee has heen committed under Part XXXill. are seized under a search waiM'aiit, and hrouijlit hefori' a justice, such Justice a i<l line or more other Justice or Justices shall determine Hunimarily whether the same are (U- arc not to he forfeited under the said I'art X X\l 1 1. (2) and if the owner of any <>'oods or thinn-s whi(di, if liie owner tiiereof have lieeii eouvieted, would he forfeited under ilic I 'tide, is unkuowu nor cannot lie found, an information or eom- I'laiui may he laid for the purpf)se only <d' enforciiiii,' such for- ri'iture. and the said Justice may cause notice to he advertised statinir that unless cause is shown to the contrary at the time and place naiiu'd in the notice, such goods or things will he declared forfeited : and at such lime and place the justice, unless the owner, er any person on his helialf. or otlier ])ers()n interesU'd in the ifiMiils or things, shows cause to the contrary, may declare such goods or things, or any of them, forfeited, ((.'ode, Art, 5(!!t,) (1) Part Vf, of tlie Code deals with the unlawful use and possension of ex- plosivB substances and offensive weapons. I-') PiirtXXXllI, of tlie Code deals with forgerj- of trade marks and I'raiululent inarkinjjof merchandise. 120 PH.\< TICM. lillliK Ti» MAillSTKATKH. It HoiiH'tiiiH's liii|>|u'iis tliiil. willmiit iiiiy flirt'ct pniol' uf ^iiill cx- isfiiijif a^^aiiist a |iiii'ly. llict'c is I'vidciicc of liis liciiii; in iiosscssimi of <;()(nls wliicli Imvc liccii stuli'ii mill wliidi llif nwiu'i' is altU* to idciiliiy. Ill smii ii (iiM-. (•nmiiial- |)roci'i'(liii<^s may lie iiiitialcil |»y an a|i|ilii'aliiin lo a jiisticc tor a scurdi warrant, wliicli licinu; grunti'il. llif siis|i('cl('(l |ii'cmisfs ai'c scarclii'il hy a constaliii', and »lioul<l the ijoods lie discovered, lliey are taken piLsscssioii of. untl tlie oeen|iier of llie |preiiiises wliereoii tliey are found is liiniself apprelieiiiled and iiroiiirlit liefore I lie magistrate lo answer the (•liarixe eillier ot' iiaviiiij stolen tlieiii or of having reieived tliem knowiiii;' tlieiii to have lieen s|(den, Wiieii tiie eharL''e is lii<ely lo nionid itself into one of reeeiviiii; ^oods knowing' I hem lo have heen sloieii. t he ohlainin^' of a seartdi warrant in the llrsi in>laiiee will he the most advisahle course, siiiee the |ii'oseeiitor is therehy enahleij al the same lime not (inly to sei/e the :;'oo(|s u|ion the premises liefore I hey are made away witii. — and soolitain eoii,ciil evidence in siippijrl of his cune. — l)iil ul«o to apprcdiend t he parly siis|pceted of ifuilt in the transaction : where- as, if merely a warrani to apprehcml he ohtained in the tii'sl in- stance, ^reat dillicully may afterwarils he c.\perienced in i;-etlim( al till' propertw and a ease, otherwise almost conclnsive. may fail for want of t he nceosary evidence to support it. When, thei'd'on-. a jiarly whose i;'(((m1s have heeii stolen has rea sonahle L;r.iuiii|s tin' suspecting that they are upon the premises of Homeolher person, he should ijo hefore a juslice having; jurisdictidii in the district where (he premises to Ik^ searched arc siluale. ami make oath hy himself or hy witness of the facts upon which he liases his application ; and. ii])on the justice lieiny,- satisfied cithci- that the i;'oods have heen stolen, or that there is reason to snspcci tliey are stolen, and I hat there is also rea.soii to helieve they are ii])on the premises indicated, he will grunt his warrant to search the premises and si'ize tlie goods and also to ajiprehend the party in whose jiossession they may he found. (1)) The aho\'e A rl icle .")(!!) aut hori/es 1 he issiu^ t»f a si'arch warrani whenever the justice is .satisfied hy information upon oatli thai tlierc is reasonahle ground for helieving that tlnM'c is in any ]»rein (1) Elsee V. Smith, 1 D. cS: K. !I7. SKAItCII KiiH I'lllMf STlillKH. 121 im's. 1. aiivtliiiii!; iipKii iir in rfspcct ol'wiiicli iiiiy otU-iici' has licfii or i> xiispfttcil til have Ik'cii committt'il. or, 2. aiiyl liiiiij wliicli iIutc In i-cii'i'iiaMi' yrniiiiil to lii'licNi' will all'ord cvidciict' as ti> tlu' cotii- iiii>-ii>ii lit any olVciicc. or. II. anylliin^ wliidi ilicrc is rcasoiiulilc ijroiinii to liclii'vc is intemliul to he imeil to cotnniit any oMciicc tor wliicli the otrcnilcr may Itc arrt'sicil williont warrant. Till' foh>talili' to wlioni a srarcli warrant is (jircclcil ami to wIkmh il i>< I'nl rnstcd si ion Id n>c ^I'fat rant ion in i he cxccntion of it. He slioidd lie acronipanicd to llu' [ircniiscs l>y llif owner of tjic pro- pcru or l>y sonn- ollii'i" pt-rson aide to point onl and swear to ijic tfoods in (picsiion. If tlic prcndscs jirt' elosrd and t lie consiaMi' is denied adnns>ion after nuiUinn' demand ofadnnssion and dis(dosini; ills aul liorily and I lie oliiffl of Ins visit, i he premises may l>e forced open liy Inm. ( I) In making the searcdi. care innsi lie tiiU'cn that no o'her .yjoods llian I hose desiivnali'd in the warrant. (-) or sutdi as have heen acliially stolen, (.-i) he sei/eil. .sijiould the i^oods souvht lor he found, the ccmstahle will sei/.e and keep I hem in his po>ses>iun. and he will t hen, also, hy \irt ne of lii^ warrant . ajipridiend I he person on whos;' pi-eniises they have keen lonnd and take him hid'ore tlu' man'istrate l<i answer the cliari,'e wdn(di will then he preferred ai^ainsl him. W'iiere. on I he preiinnnary enipHry into a (dniri^e of havini;' and cnncealin;;- pi'operly helonyinij to iinother. the prisoner was acipiillecl of any wrony;fnl taking;, detention or concealment theiv- I'l'. it was held tlnil the magistrate was still entitled lo retain the piopei'iy. it proved to Iiuve heen .stiden, until tiu' otienee could he I I'ied. or nniil for sonu' sutticient reason no trial eouhl he liail ; Itnt that if il appiiire(| that the properly was not stolen it should he returned to the owner. (4) Koarcli for l*iil>li<> NIoroN.— Any <'onstalile or otlier otiicer. if deputed hy any puhiie de|iarlment. nniy. within the limits (1) Saunders Prac Mag. Cte. 5 Ed. 198, 19'9. (2i IVice V. Mosseuser, 2 B. & R 158; Bell v- Oakley, 2 M. & Sel. 259. (31 Cro/ier v. ruiidy, G B. & C. 232. (4 ) Howell V. Armour, 7 Ont. R. 303. 122 PRACTU'.Vl, (il'lliK TO M.VOISTItATKS. for wliich 1k' is such coiistabli' <>i' pi'ticc ortiiH'i'. sti)|i. <U'taiii and st'arcli any iktsoii irasoiial)!}' Kuspocted of havinijj or coiiv-yiiig in any manner any public stores dcrincd in section aS.! of tlic (,'ode, stolen or unlawfully oiuained. o.r any vcssi'l. Iioat or vtdiiclc^ in or on wliich there is reasim to sus[)ect that any puhlic stores stolen or unlawfulh' ohiained may bo found. 2. A constable or other peace ottieer shall be deemed to be de- l)uted within the nu'anini^- of this section if lu' is doputod by any writiui^- siirned iy the ])ersou who is the lu-ad of such department, or who is authorized to siga documents on behalf of such de[iart- iiient. (Code. Art. 570.) The expression ■ pulilic stores " includes all stores under the care, superintendence or control of any jiuiilic department or of any jierson in (beser\ice of su(di de])arlment. (Code. Art. .'JS;!. b. ) Noarrh Warrant lor ITIiiii'd (irold, Kilver. otc. — On complaint in writiiii;- made to any Juslit'cof tiie county, district, or place, by any person interested in any miinim; claim, that mined gold oi- yokl-bearing quartz, or mined or unmauufacturi'd silver or silver-ore. is uidawfully depositc'd in any place, or held by an\- per- son contrary to law. a general .search warrant nuiy be issued by such justice, as in the case of stolen goods, including any number of places or ])ersons nanu'd in sucdi complaint : and if. ui)on such 80ur(di. any such gold or gold-bearing (|uart/,. o'- silver or silver-ore is found to be unlawfully deposited or held, the justice shall nnike such oi'iler for the restoration tiiereof to the lawful ownt'r as he eon.siders right. 2. The <lecision of the justice in su( h casi' is subject to apjieal ;ts in ordinary casi-s coMiing within the provisions of Pari L\'lll. (Co<le. Art. 571.) Part LVIIl of the Code relates to SumiTiaiy Convictions. Sec post. Koar«*li l>y Fea<*o <>fti«*or for l>«>taiiio«l IjIiiiiImm*. «»t<*. — If any constable or olhei- jieace otiicer has I'easonable ca\i--t' to suspect that any timbei'. mast. s|)ar. saw-log. oi- otherdesci-iptidii of lumber, belonging to any lumbernuin or owner of lumln'r. ami bearing the registeri'd trade nnirk id' su(di lumberman (u- ownei" nl' SEARCH WARRANTS. 123 liimluT, is kvp\ oi' (lotaiiuid in any suw-miil. inill-yanl. boom or raft, wiliioiit tlic knowlodyo or consent of the owner, such constable or ntlici- |>cacc officer may enter into or upon tin; same, an<l searcli or examine for the purpose of ascertaining whtitlier such timin'r. nuist s|)ar. saw-loy or other description of lumber is detained tlierein, without such knowledge and consent. (Code, Art. 572.) K(>ur«*li lor and Noixiiro of Iiitoxicatiii;; i^fq- iior.s on Her Jlajt'Nty'.s Ships.— Any otlicer in Her .Majesty's service, any warrant or |)etty officer of the navy, or non- commissioned oihcer of nuirines, with («• without Hcameii or persons under his command, may search any boat or vessel which hovers about or approaches, or which has hovered about or approached, any of Her Majesty's ships or vessels mentioned in section 1 1!). I'art \'l. nf the Code, and nuiy seize any intoxicating liquor found on liiiurd such l)oat or vessel ; and the li(|uor so foutid shall be forfeited to the Crown. 0"'><l^'- Art. ,")7;!.) Warranto f o Noarcli IIoiinon olTlI-laiiio.- Whenever ilirrr i> reason to believe that any woman or girl mentioned in sec- tion IS,"). PaiM XIII, of the (!ode has been inveigled or enticed to u house of iil lame or assignation, then, upon complaint thereof bein"- luadf under oath by the parent, husband, master or guardian of such woinaii orgirl, or in the event of such woman or girl having no known |iaiviit, iiusband, nuister nor guardian in the place in which liic ollrnie is alleged to have bei-n committed, by any othei' pi-rson, lo any jusiice of the pi-ace, or to a judge of any court authorized to issue warrants in cases of alleged otfences against the crimiiuil law, Midi jusiice ,,| the jieace or judge of the court may issue a Wiu-rant lo enter by day or niglit. such iu)use of ill-fame or assignation, and, if necessary, use force for the i)urpose of ettecting such entry whether hy breaking o]ten doors or otherwise, and to search lor siuh woman or girl. an(! bring her, an.l the person or jHu-sons in whose kee|mig and po.ssession she is. bi'fore su(di justice of tlu> |""ii>' or judgeof the court, who may. on examinati(m. or.lcr her to '»' delivered to her parent, husband, master or guardian, or to he discharged, as law and justice re.|uire. (Code. Art. r)74.) Article 1S5 of the Code deals with oftcnces against women and 9 U'U 124 PRACTICAI, GUIDE TO MAOISTKATES. S<'»i*<'liiii}>' tiiaiiiiiiy; IIoiinon, liettiii^; lloiiMrN, anil IjO<<«'I*I*'«. — If llu' chiof t'onstablo or deputy chief coiistiilili' of any city or town, or other oiticor authorized to act in his absence, reports in writinijj to auy of the coiuinissioners of poHce or mayor of sucli city or town, or to the j)ulic(^ niagistrat(^ of any town, that tiiere are good grounds for believing, and that he does believe, that any house, room or p]ac(i within the said city oi' town is i<cpt or used as a common gaming oi' iictting-house as de- fined in i'art XIV.. sections l!t(i and ll»7 of the ("ode. or is used for the purpose of carrying on a lottciy. or for the .sale of lottery tickets, contrary to the pi-ovisions of Part X.V., section 205 of the (Jode. whether admission thereto is limited to those possessed ot' entrance keys or othi'rwisi', the said commissioners or commissioner, oi" nui\'or, or the said ])olieeiuagisti'ate. may. by ordi'r in writing, authorize the chief constable, tleputy chief constable, or other ofticcr as afore- said, to enter any su(di house, room or place, with su(di constables as are deenu'd ri'ijuisitc by the chief constable. de])Uty chief constabk' or otlu'r otticer. — ami. if necessary, to use force for the ])uri)ose of I'tfecting such entry, whether i)y breaking open doors or otherwise. — and to take into custody all persons who are found therein, and to si'ize. as the (asi' may be. 1. — all fables ;ind instni ments of gaming, or betting, ami all momys and securilies for money, or 2. — all instrunuMits or <levices for the cai'rying on ot sucli lottery, and all lottery tickets found in su(di house oi' ]i remises. 2. The (diief constable. de])Uty (diicf constalile or other oHicei' nmUing siudi I'litry. in oliedjence to any order, may. with the assis- tance of one <u' more constaiiles. si'iircb all parts of the lionsv'. room or place which be has so enti'ieil. where he suspi'cts that tables oi' instruments of gaming or betting, or any such instrunu'uts or dcNMces for the carrying on of such lottery (U' any lottery ticUets. arc conct'alcil. and all ))ersons \\hom lu' tinds in sindi honsc or jiremisi's. and sei/.e all tables and instruments of gaming, or bet ting, or any such insti'uments or devices or lotler\' tickets, wlii. li he so tinds. ;». The police magistrate or other .jiistlcc of the peaci- before ■whom any |ierson is taken by \irtue of an order or warrant luider this section, may direct any cards, dice, balls, counters, taldes or other instrnnienis of gaming, used in playing any gann-. ami SKAI<rill.\(i ()AAI1N(J ICOr.SES. 125 seized unilcr I lit' ('(xk' in any placv usi-d as a common <famino-- liousc. oi- any taldi's and instfunu'uts of l>ottin<f so si-ized in anv jilacc used as a coiiinion l)ottiiig-h()nsc oi- any siudi instrunicnts or dcviros I'oi' llic caiTvinif on of u lottery, or of anv siudi lottorv iicl<('ts as afori'said. to lie fortiiwitli dcstroyfd. and anv monoy or sccnrilic's si'izod nndor thisscotion sliall he forfoitod to tlio Crown tor I ill' |iul)li(' uses of Canada. 4. Tic expression •chief constable" includes chief of police, city marshal, or otlier head of the ])o]ice foirc of anv city, town or place. ;■). The expression ••deputy chief constable " includes deputy chief of iiolice. deputy or assistant city marsiial. or otiier deputy head of tlie |iolice force of any city, town or place, and the expres- sion • iioiice magistrate " includes stipendiary magistrates. (Code. Art. ."jT."). as amended by iiT-oS Vic., c. 57. sec 1.) A COIUIIKHI UAMlNa-HOUSE i.s — (,7.) a house, room or place ke|)t by any p(>rson for gain, to which ).ersons resort for the purpose of playing at any jrame of chance ; or (h.) a house, room or place kept or used for Jilaying therein at any -ame of cIkiimc. or any nii.xed game of chance and skill, in which — (i.) a l)ank is kcpl by one or more of the players exclusively of the others : nr (ii.) ill whicii niiv --aine is played the (dianccs of wlii.d. i .v not :dike lavonraMc in all the players, inclmling anmng the jilayers 111'' banker or other persmi by wh..m the game is n.anaged. or a-amst wlmni the game is managed, or against whom the other playeiN slake, play or bet. (Code. Art. liXI.) A comnioi, BETTlN.i-HousE is a Inmsc. .itfice. room or other place — " ' "l"'i"'d. kept, or us,.,| tor the purj.osc of betting between pciM.h- r(.s,.rtiiio. ilicrcto and — '!:^ " ^^'i"''- '"•'■npier or keeper thereof : (" ' anv person iwjng ilu. same ; 126 I'RACTICAl- GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. (iii.) any jjoason prociuvd or oiui)loyed l)y. or iu'tiiig lor oi- on behalt'ot' any sui-h jtcrson ; (iv.) any ]n'rson having tlu- caro and inanagonionl. or in any maimer condiifling tlio business thoroof ; oi- (6.) opened, kepi, or nsi'd tor liic pur|)oso of any money or vain- able thing being rotvived by or on bohalf ol' any sn(di person as aforesaid, as or for the considoration — (i.) for any assurance or undei'laUing, express or implied, to pay ov give thereafter any money or valnalile thing on any event or eontingeney for or I'elating to any liorse-i-ae(M)r other raee, tight, game, or s])ort : or (ii.) for seenring the paying or giving by some other person of any money or valuable thing on any sueh event or eontingeney. (('ode. Art. l!)7.) Article 201. par. ;!. of the Code makes a bueki't-shop. that is (n sav. an otiiee or plaee of liusii\e.ss in \vhi(di gaming in stocks is earric'l on. a c(unmon gaming-house. The above Article 575. with reference to warrants to search houses suspected of being common gaming-houses. ])rovides that such a warrant may be issued to the chief r.-^nJabk or deputy cfvef constable of any city or town ; and by claust's 4 and 5. it detines tlic expression '•chief constable" as iiududing thi' chief of police, city marshal, or other head of the police force of any city, tnwn or place. and the expression '• <leputy (diief constable " as including llu- deputy c hi ff of police, etc.. of any city, town w place. It woidd app-'ar. therefore, that such searcli warrants are only to be issued to and i'xecuted by the head or deputy head oVupolice force of a citi/. toKn or place, (tlu^ word • idace" being probably meant tn incliule places under the control of the head of a jirovineial or ;i county police force), and that, under the terms of Article 575. tiny cannot be issued to or executed by. for instance, the high constalilc or deputy high {'unstable of the district of .Montreal, (who seems to be more of a head or chief bailitf of the Criminal Courts than ;i police otticer) nor by any other constable or otticer unconnecicii with and not occu])ving the ])osition of head oy deputy head of lln' police force of a city or town or the head or de[)Uty head of a pro- vincial or county police force. SKARflllNIi GAMI.NMi HOUSKS. 127 l*>iil. qunere. siipiiose a coiistaltk' or other peaci' ofHoor not i>ccii|iyiiiii' till' |ii)sitioii of he(vi or deputy head of a police, force, wcm-c to rt'ccivc ami ad upon siicli a warrant, and lo tiii'l. iii>oii ciitorinij the siis|icct('(l prciuisi's. ij, niiml)L'r of ifainiiiu; in.striimi'iits and soMic iKTsoiis ciiii'aLfi'd tlicrt- in iilayini>\ would lie not have thi' riii'lit (ind('|icn(h'ntly of any warrant), to apprt'luiud siicli p^'rsons. undci' the authority of clause Hof A rticK' r)")^. (inte. wliicdi pi-ovides I hat ANY I'F.AcK oi'i'icKH may arrest. icUhout warrant, any one whom he finds ctnnmittinn- an ott'enee a,i"'ainst tliis Aet ? (^r, would the fact of su(di coustahle. or peace ottici'r not hein^- the proper ottieer authoriy.ed liy .\rticle 575 to receive and act upon a warrant to scarcdi a susi)ecti'(| n-aniiui.,^ house, dehar him from makiiii;- any valid arrest of jjcrsons found in the premises entered liy him liy virtue of sued: a warrant. .\ case soMU'whai in point recent ly arose in tlu' city of Montreal. On the l-Mli Octol.ci'. !S!i;i. a warrant was issue(|. (uiiilei- Article 575). hy I'nlice .Magistrate Duii'as to l)e])uty .lli<>;h Constalile IJis- sotinctte to sear(di jiremi.ses allej^'ed to lie kept hy oni* Mahmev as a common naniin.i;' house. I'lider tliis warrant Hissonnette, with the assistance of several other otth-ers entered the premises and found therein a numher of oiuniuii- insti'unu'uts consisting- of cards, I (lice, halls, counters, rcudctte tahles. card cutlers or nuirkers. etc., ^ and live or six pers(>iis seated at a n'aminii' tahle. Tlu' otHcers ■^5* .sci/.ed and carried away the iiamiui:; instruments together with ;^; several thou.sand dollars in cash, and tlicy appre'hended .Maloney ,;!^ and tlie five or six jtersons found in the premises. On the follow- "^i inn- .Monday (ItJlh OcK.hcr). .Maloney was (diari^-ed. un(ler;Artiele ',r 1!1S of the Codi'. with the iiulictahle otfeiu'c of kee|)ing a ifaiuinjif ' liousc. and .Judge l.)ugas. after fixing a tinu' for liolding the pre- liminary iiivcsfigafion and after hearing 'special evidence as to the nature of the articles seized, ordci'ed the destruction of |iu- gaming iiisti'umcnts and the conliscation of tlie monies. With regard to the persons t, ,1111(1 in the premises, they were h rough t hefore Polieo Magisii'.it,. Dcsnoycrs to he sumnuirily tried under_Artiele ]!»!• of ilie ("o(h>. for the non-indictahle olfcuce of having licen found I'laymg in a common gaming Ikuisc. The counsel for the defen- dants raised the ohjcclion that iiissonnette the Deputy High Con- siahlc was not smdi a ficer as is autJK.rized umler Article 575 to i'<''ive and c.veculc .i warrant to .search a suspected gaining house, 128 rKACTICAr. (il IDK TO .MA(ilSTRATKS. itiiisiinu-li as 111- is only a I)i')iiily lliu'li Cniistal)!*' in (•oiMicctiiin will) tho ('riiniiial ("diii-Is ami not tin- lu'ad oi- (l('|iiily head ol' any liolice foire. l)Ut tlial the |)ni|HTi)tH('oi' to ri'ci'ivc and t-xi'cuti' sncli il warrant was tlu' Cliicfor l)i'])nty Cliii'f of tlu' police t'oi'co ol'tlu' City of NFontival. lliat tlu' warrant and the entry ihcnMindiT of the ]>ivn)ises in (piestion iieiny; ilK'^'al. the arresi made at the sanu' time of the defendants was also illeji-al. and that therefore they conld not lie lei;-aliy tried njion theidiarii'e |>'eierred a^'ainst ihem. .luciije Di'snoyers tooU a note (d' tlu' ohjeetion. the defendants pleadeil not .'i-nilty. the trial was proei'ed with, and at its elose the Tiidge reserved his deeisiim nntil ihe l!;>rd Oetoher, ISiKS. when he rendered judginent against the defendants, linding theii gnilly of being fouie' ])laying in a gaming house and imposing a fine upon eaeli. lie held that, whatever force there miglit be in the ohjee- tions raised hy the defendant's eoimsei. they wcmv of no avail in the ease against the defendants, although tliey might he found to have some value in that hraneh of the tran.saetion wliiidi related to the case against Maloney. as the keeper of the house, and in deciding that tlie defendants were ivgnlarly before him, he relied upon Articles 22, 24, 552. 557 and 84H of the Code, and jiartieulai'ly upon Article 24, "which," he said, -gives any private individual the riglit of arresting without warrant any person whom he tinds com- mitting an ott'euce." and upon .\rticle 577. whicdi (when read in connection with .\rticle S4H). provides that when any person accused of an otfenee-is before a justice whether voluntarily or upon summons or after being a|)itr(dien(led icith or without a warrant, the .Fustioe shall proceed to eu(iuire into the matters charged against such person. (1) Sections!) and 10 of H. S. (',. tdiap. 15S. (whi(di are unre]ieale(l i. empower a Polici' Magistrate to swearand examine, wlu'u brought before him. any ])ersons found in any gaming liouse entered and searched under the ]>rovisions of Article 575. Tliese sections are as follows : " The police magistrate, mayor or justice of the peace, before whom any person is brought who has been foun<l in any Iioum'. room or place, entered in jinrsuanee of any warrant or order issmd (1) R. V. Louis Aaron and others, Crankshaw's Cr. C. 646, 647. SKAHl'llINd (iA.MIN<i IIIHSES. 129 iiiidfr tlic CimK'. iniiy ivtiuiiT any «iu"li ixTson to l)o oxamiiiccl on oalli iiml In n'ivo t-vidt'iu'c louchiiii!; any u.,lji\vful i^ainiiiujin such liniisc, I'oinii or iilaci^. or toiicliiiiy; any a. t ilonc for the jinrposo of lirt'vcntiu!;-. olistrni-tinii- or dolayinu; the entry into sncli liousc, room or plai't'. or any purl llu'rt'of, of any constaltk' or olHcior antliori/i'd as afori'saul ; and no person so roquiriMl to l)i' cxanuncd as a witncssslnill l)i' excnsi'd from licinif so examined wlion brought, licfore su(di police nuit;Mst rate, niayoi' or justice of tlio peace, or from lieinu; so examined at any sui)se<iuent time liy or before the police nuiiiistrate or nniyor or any Justice of tlie jteace. or by or iieforc any court, on any proceedinif. oi- the trial of any indictment, information, action or suit in anywise reiatiiii;' to such unlawful liiinnui;- or any nucIi acts as aforesaid, or tVoni answerinii; any i|ueH- lion put to bini toU(diinif the nuitter afon'said. on tlu' ground tluit his evidence will tend to eriniiiuite himself ; and any such person so re(|uired ui lie examined as a witness who refuscN to nuike oath accor(linii-ly. or lo answer any suidi (pu-stidn. sluiU he siibject to b<' dealt wilh in all respects as any person appearing; as a witness l»e- forc any justice or court in obedience to a summons or sul)]>(Bna and refusing-, without lawful cause or excuse to be sworn or to y-ivc I'vidence. nniy. l>y law. be dealt witli ; l)Ut notliing in this sec- lion shall rentier any offender, liable on his trial to examination licreunder." (Sec. It.) ■■ l^ver}' person so re([uiri'd to be examined as a witnt'ss. who, Upon su(di examination, nuikes true disclosure, to the best of his knowledge, of all things as to which lie is examined shall receive [^irom the judge, justice of the peace, magistrate, examiner or othei" Judiciiil otticer before whom sutdi proceeding is had, a certificate in writing to that etiect. and shall be freed from all criminal [jrosecu- tioiis and penal actions, and from all j)enalties. forfeitures and )unis|imciits to which he has become liable for anything done be- ifore that time in respect of the matters regarding which he has pK'cM examined ; but sindi certificate shall not be effectual for the p)urpose aforesaid, urdess it states that such witness made a true [disclosure in respect to all things as to which he was examined ; |an<l any action, indictment or ])roceedings pending or brought in lany court against .such witiu'ss. in re.s))eet of any act of gam- ling regarding which he was so (examined, shall be stayed, upon the hu'oduction and proof ..fsu.di certificate, ami upon sununary appli- 13(1 I'RArTirAI, (il IDE TO MAOISTHATES. <'.iiti()M 1() llic court ill wliicli siicli aclioii. iiKlicliiiciit or profci'd- iiiii; is |K'ii(liiiii;, oi" iiny jiid^t' tlu'i'cot. or iiiiy jinlifi' of any ol' tlut supoi'ior rourls of iiiiy province. ' (Sec. 1((.) Warrant lo Scarrli lor I'ayjraiiixj. -Any sti|nn(li:iry or |iolicf iniiffistratc, mayor or warden, or any two justices of llie peace. u|ion inlbrniation Ind'ore tlicni made, llial any iierxni de- .scrilicd in I'arl }iY . of t lie ( 'ode as a loose, idle or disorderly person, or van'raiit. is, or is rt^asonalily suspecteil to In-, harliored or coneealeil in any <iisorderly house, liawdy-liouse. house of ill-faiiie. tavei'ii or boardiny-hou.se. may, hy warriint. authorize any constnhle or other ]terson to enter, at any time, such housi' or tavern, and to appre- hend and hrinif hefori! them or any other Justii-es of the |H'acc, <-ver}' person found therein so suspccteil as aforesaid. (('ode. Art. r)7tf.) <ltli«>r Srarrli Warranto and l*4»w«'rM 4»r ^ioaroli or ol" l<jlltr;|°. — Any fishery otticer or other jiistiei- of the peace may scar(di, or <rrant a wan-ant to seartdi. any vi'ssel or phuc \vhere there is reason to l(clie\'e that any tish taken in violation of the Fisheries Ad, or anything used in violation thei-cof. is con- cealed. (I) And certain ortici^rs and persons are empowered hy the .1,"/ respectimj Fishin;/ hij Foreign Vessel.^, and its amendiiu'iits. to liriny,- into port any ship, vessel or hoat. hcinn' wit liiii an_\' liarhor in Caiuula, or hovcrinif in British wati'rs within threi' marine miles <d' any of the coasts, hays, creeks or liarluirs in ('aiiada. and to si'ar( li her carijjo. (2) ruder the Wrecks and Salvage Act. a wreck receiver, who sus- pects that any wreck is secreted or concealed, may (ditain from any justice' of llie peace- a search warrant to search for. rc'inove. and detain the secreted wre(d<. (.!) Whenever a warrant for the ap])rehonsion of a person accused <d'an offence' has iiecn endorsed in pursuance i)t' [\)v fui/itice Offend ers Act. in Camula. any iiiaf>'ist rate in Canaila has tlu' .same power of issuing a warrant to search for any property alleged to have > (1) K. 8. C, c. Kj, sec. 17, par. 2. (2) 40 Vic, c. 114, sec. 1. (:i) H. S. C, c. 81, sec. 41. UTIIEII SEAKCII WAIUIANTS. 131 lifcii st(ilfi) ni' fo lie olii'.'i'wisc uiiljiwCiilly (alvcii or ulilaincd liy Micii iicrsoii. oi' iitlu'rsvisc to lie liic siiliji'ct of sucli otl'dK't', as tliiit iiiaifistrali' woiiM liavi' iC llic |ii'o|ici'ty liad \)vv\\ stolen oi- otlu'r- wise uiilaw't'nily taken or olitained. or the oll'enee Inul hoen eoni niitled \vli(dly uitliin tiie jnrisdielion (d'sii(d» niagiistruto. (1) Any coniinissioner aiijiointed nnder the Act respeetinu,' tlie Pri' sensation of the. Peace, in the I'irinitj/ of Publie Works, or any Jnstiee of tlie peace liaviiii;- autlioi'ity within the place in \vhi(di the Act is at the time in foi'ci', may — u|)on liie oath of a crodihle witness that he helieves that any weapon is in the possession (d' any person, oi- in any Ikmisc or place, contrary (o the provisions (d' the Act — issue his warrant to any constahle or peat'e otlici'r to suarcdi for and si'ize tlie same ; and he or any person in his ai<l may sear(d> for and seize the same in the poss(>ssion of any ])('rson oi' in any such house or place. (2) And a warrant may l>i' issued to searcdi for intoxieatini;- Iniuoi- witli respect to w]n(di a \iolation of the ]irovision> of tlu' Act is hi'lieved to have hcen committed oi' to he intended t(. lie conunitted. ('!) In the Xorth West Teri'itoi'ies, any Justice of the peace or anv judjie of the Sujireme Court of the Territories, upon complaint nnide hcfore him. supported hy t he evidence of one ei'edihle witness, that any intoxicating- li(|Uor is manufactured, imported, sold. I'x- eiiangcd. traded or hartercd in violation (d' the North West Terri- tories Act. may issue a searcdi warrant as in eases of stolen j^oods. (4) And in I he district of Keewatin a sinnlai' wari'ant to searidi foi' intoxicatiriii' li(pior may. upon a like complaint, he i.ssued liy any .judi;'e. stijiendiary ma^'istrate or Justice of the peace. (5) Hy the North West Mounted Police Act, 1S!)1, it is provided that, u|ion infoi'nuitio! .o- upon reasonalile i^'rouuds of suspicion, and without the necessity of any intervention or process of law. the iiiemhei's of the force nuiy, -in tho.se portions of the Xorth West Territ<M-ies in whicdi the law relating- to the jirohiliition of into.xi- canls remains in force. — enter any shop, store, hut. tent. wi>--wam, (1) R. S. C, c. 14:i,.sec. 12. (-') R. 8. C.,c. 151, sees. (3) /fc., sec. 16. , (4) K. 8. C. c. oO, sec. i)l. (5) H. S. C. c. 53, sec. 37. l;}2 l'lt.\( TIPAI, (il IliK Til MAtilSTKATES. (Iwclliim; or Idiililini;'. oc idiirc. oi' ciiclosun'. iiiid also t-iitcr iiiid for such |nii'|((is(' s(<i|i iiiiil (liMaiii wliilc ti'iix cHiim,- iiiiy vessel, cunuc. c'urriiijjfe. \va,iiu;nii. ciirt. sleiiili. orntlier veliicle or nieiiiis ><{' edii- vciymuio ot'iiny liesri'iptinii. iiiid searcli all parls iliereuf. ami any kcijs. harrcls. eases, iioxes. m- |)aekati;es or reeejilaeles of any kind, I'oi- spirits, sli'oiii;- walers. s|iirilnoiis licniors. wines, or t'ei-nienteil or eoHi|)onn(led liipiors. oi' iuto.xieatini;' drink ol' any kind, and break and destroy any sindi keu;s. hurrels. eases. Iioxes or |ia(d\ai^eH or otiier receptacles of any kind found eontainini;' tlu' sanu'. and ponr ont and destroy all spirits, slronu; waters. spiritn<nis ii(|iiors, wiiH's. or fermented oi' coin|)ouiiiled licpiors oi- intoxicatinii" drink ; l)ut no constaliie slnill so enli'r any liut. tent. wi<;wain or dwellinti;. iiidess accojiipanied jiy or nndei- tlu' tu'der of a eoniniissione<l otlieer. (1) Hndi'i' tlie Act for tin' preserxation of y'ame in the un.irgani/.eii portions of the North West Territories, any n'arne y-nai'dian who lias reason to suspect that a iireach of any of t lie provisions ol the Act has heen committed, or that any ln'ast, hird oi- e^'.i!,'^ in resjiect of whndi siudi a lireach has heen eominit ti'd, or any part of any heast or hird. in rcsjiect of wliich smdi a lirea(di lias hei-n com niitted. is likely to 1k' in any lent or on any |)rcrnises or on hoard any ve.s.sei or in any conveyaiKH'. may hy warrant under his hand autliori/.e any constahle to enter and search smdi tent. |)remises, ve.s.sel or conveyunee. and if found to seize any sutdi heast. hird or eggs or any such part of any heast or hird. (2) Tinder the Seamen's Ac^ justices of the peacoat any jiort or place in the Provinces of Q\iehee. Nova Scotia. New liruuHwiek, I'l'ince .Kdward Island and Uritish Colnnihia, are authorized to grant war- rants to .search for seanu-n oi- apprentices unlawfully concealed or secreted ; (;i) and any police otHcor or constable recjiiired by the Act, to assist in apprelu'ndingaiiy seaniun orapitrcntico unhnvtully absenting himself from his ship, may eiitei- any tavern, inn. alc- liouse. beer house, seamen's boarding-house orolher house or phui of entertainment o'' into any liquor shop or other I'cfreshment place or any house of ill-faim\ (-1) And luider the Inland Waters Sea (1 ) 57 & 58 Vic. v.- '11 , sec. 13. (2) 57 & 58 Vic. c. 31, sec. 20. (:!) R. S. C. c. 74, sec. 1 19. (4) //;.,Keo. 124. iTIIEII SEMK'II WAItllANTS. i;!:5 meii'.s Art iiiirl in ( '. ^imiliir jinwcrs an' y;ivcii In jiislici's of llic |i('iici'. ill iniv 'iiiimla. In ii-raiil \\iirraiit> to si'im-li forsfiimi'ii iiiihiw rully I, ;,,•!.<. ivil ,.!• secret. 'il. aii'l I" |>"li''«' "llicers and constal.li's to eiitiT taverns, etc. ( 1 i Any siii.i-rintenilent of liarlmr and river police and any conslal.ie j,|,|„,i'iiic(| under llie autliority of tlie Ad respeHiii.^; llie llarlmr and Uiver I'.dice of llie I'roviiiee of (^uel>ee. may lioard any vessel for the imrpose of arrest in j^; or seareliin.i-' for any person I'or whoso arrest a warrant lias lu'i'ii issueil. (2) Anv inspector or other ollicer appointeil under the Animal Con- tagious Diseasfs Art may. at any time, for the purpose of eai-ryini;- into elleel any of the provisions of the Act. t'liter any eonimotij ' ■ ■' ' s within his district, in tield. stalde. cowshed or other preniisei wlii(h he has reasonahle i;'rouiid for supposinif that any animal atVi'cted with any infectious or conian'ious disease is to lu' found, iiut shall, if reipiired. slate in wrilinm the g'nuind on which he so enters. (:>) lie may also at all times enter on hoard any steiuuship. steamer, vessel or hoat in respect whereid' he has reasonahle n'roiind for supposing that any coniiiany or pei-son has faih'd to eoni]ily with the requirements id' any ordei- rospuctinii; the cleansing and (lisinfectiiitr of steamshiiis. steamers, vessels, hoats. pens, eavriages, trueUs. horse-hoxi's or vehicles used hy such company or jierson i'or the carriage of animals, and on pl■enlise^ where he has reasoii- iihlo ground for supposing that any pen. carriage, ear, vessel, truidv, hoi'sc-hox or vehicle in respect wlierecd' any eoiniiuny or person has on any occasion so faileii, is to lie found. (4) Any jieaceotticeror eonslahle may. at all times, enter any jprem- fises where he has reasonaiile ground for su|)|iosing that there is hiiiy cai'. truck, or vehicle, in respect of whicdi any compan\' <ir jiei'son [lias tailed to comply with the jirovisions of .\rticle 5 14 of the ('o(le. Mis to the treatment of eiittle while in transit hy rail or water, or to [enter on hoard any vessel in respect of which he has reasonahle ground for supposing that any comjiany or person has, on any occasion, so failed. ((Jode, Art. 515). (1) R. S.C. c. 75,8.8.42,43. (2) R. S. (". c. 89, sec. 6. (3) U. S. V. c. G9, sec. 34. (4) lb. sec. 35. . 134 I'KACTICAI. Ill I UK Ti> MAdlHTKATErt. Any iCiis iiispcctnr :i|i|M)iiil('(l iiiidfr tlif <7rj,s fns/ierfion Act. inav at all rt'asoiialtlc hours imiIit any placid witliin liis (listrict wIut.- any inoU'i* Ih umimI for im^aHiiriii^ j^as (Iclivcri'd (o a imrcliascr. tor tlu- |tiir|ioMi' of ins|»i'ctinif tlu- nu'h'r so usivl ; (I) iuid, uiidcr tin- Petmleuin fim/ii'' tion Ant. any duly aiil liorizrd inspcclor may. at any tiiiu- diiriiii; ordinary JMisiiicNS liours, i-ntci- the rclim-rv slioii or wari'lioiisc of any person who refiucs or ki-cps petroleum oi- naptiia for sale, ill oi-der to test the (|iialily of the petroleum or naptha found tiierein. (2) A u-eiu'lils' and measures' inspeetoror his assistant miiy at all rea- somilile times, without notiee, enter any sliop. store, warehoii.se, stall. yard or place, within hin divisioii, where any commodity is houijcht. sold. oxpOHwl or Icopt for sale, or where a chary;i' is made for the carriau'i' <»!• conveyance there(d' liy weiifhl ny measure, and tluu' • examine ail wciirhts. measures, scales, steelyards or other weii^hini;- maciiines. (.{) I'liiler the Kli'ctric fjight rnspei-tion Act. any ofli^er of the con- tractors furnishin/j; electricity for lii^htinjjj pur|)()Si^s may. \>y writ ten authority of the inspector. I'liter. at all reasonahle times, anv jiremises (o whi(di elect ricity is or has hcen sup|iiied hy the contrac- tors, in order to inspect their electric wires, nutters, accumulators, tittinifs, works and ajiparatiis for the supply of electricity, oi- for the purpose of ascertainini^ the ipiantity of electricity c(nisume(l or su|iplied. or. where a supply of electricity is no Ioniser rei|uire(l or the contractors are autliorize(l to take away and- cut otl' the su[»ply of electri(Mty from any pi'emises, for the purpose of removing any electric lines, accumulators, tittings. works and apjiaratus helong- ing to the contractors, repairing all damagt' caused hy such entry, inspection or removal. (4) (1) H. S. Co. 101, sec. 6, (2) R. 8. ('. c. 102, sec. 17. (3) R. 8. C. c. 104. sec. 45. (4) 57 and 58 Vic, c. 39, sec. ll. VOKMM. liif) FORMS i;:^i)KR I'Airr siav, ok thh (Jode. A.— {Section ^^1.) WMIUANT I'H I'DNVEY HEKOKK A .JUSTICE OK ANOTHER rOUNTV. ( 'Miiaila. I'roviiiiM' of Cniuilv el' 1 Wlicrciih iiitKriiiiilinii ii|i(>n nulli was this dny mukIc hcfori' tlio iiiMlirsigiH'd. lliat A. R. of , on llic day of , ill ilii' yoar . at. , in I lie t'oiinly of , (state the rhanje. (1) Ami ulici'cas I have taken llir deposition o|' X. Y. as to tiie said ollcnee. And wliereas tlie (dnu'ge is of an otl'ence conunilted in tlieconnty el' Tiiis is to eonmiand you to eonvey tiie said {luivie ol acfusfd), of . Iiefore some jusliei^ of tiie last-numtionod ronnty, near liie aliove |ilaee. and to deiivei" to Inni t Ids warrant and lln' said ile|iiisilioii. jiatcd at . in the said county of , tili^ day of , in tiie your .1. s.r J. /■*.. {Name of coiniti/.) To of n.-iSeciion 557.') IlKrKII'T IM liE (IIVEN TO TlIK CONSTABI-E HV TIIE .lUSTlrK FOR TMK ('01 NTV IN WHICH THE OFFENCE WAS COiM.MITTKl). • 'aiiada. ") i'rovnice of , C Ceuiily of . ) I 0) Fur I'lirms of Statements ofOfiFeoces, see pp. 143, et seq., pa^l. I'I'I I'liACTICAl, (HIDE Td .MACUSTKATES. I. .1. Ij.. ii juslicc (if llic peace in and tbi- tlie counly (if , liereliy eei'tity tliat \V. '\\. peace oHicer oj' (lie county of , liiis. (Ml iliis (lay of . in the year of , by \irHie of and in olu'dience (o a warrant of ,1. S.. I']s(|uire. a Justice of the jieaee in and for the ('(uinty of . prodnced lii'fore me one A. B.. cliari;-ed liefore the said. I. S. with havini;- (eti\. statimj shortUj the offence), and (lelivere(| hint into the cus- tody of . l)y my direction, to answer to tlie said ( harye. and further to lie dealt with aecordiui;- to law. and has also deiieered unto me the said warrant, toi^'ether with the information {if any) in liiat hehalf. and the de])osilion (s) i>\' ( ". D. (and of ). in the said warrant mentioned, and tliat he has also pi'dved to me. upon oalii. tlie handwriting of the said .1. S. si.liserilied to t lie same. I>ate(| the day and ye.ar first ahove mentioned, at . in the said count\' of J. L., J. P.. (Name of county.) ('.— (Section rm.) INKOIl.MATION A.\n COMPLAINT FOR AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE. ( 'anada. Province of Count V of :t 'The information and e()mj)laint of ('. I), of (yeoman). taki'U this day of , in the year hefove the undersiirned (one) of ITer ALaJesty's justices of the peace in and for the said county of . who saith that (1) on at , (<l''C.. statinij the offence). (2) (1) If the offender is merely sn-spected to have committed tiie offence, and the informant did not see him commit it, insert liere, — " he hath jn.<<t catw to believe and mupcct, and doth believe and suspect that." Then insert the name and address, etc., of the otfendor, if known, or, if his name and address, etc., be not known, insert his description, as follows : — " a certain man " (or if he be a foreigner, "a certain Italian, or, as the case ma>i be") ''whose name is not knoim, l)Ut the description nf }rhose person is staled in tlie margin hereof." t'J) For Forms of statements of offences, see pp. 143, et seq., post. FOHMS. 137 Sworn tn'iurc (me), llic ihiy and year first above nuMitionod. at .1. S., J. P., (^Name of county.') ll— (Section niid.) WARRANT TO APPREHEND A PERSON CHARGED WITH AN INOICTABLE OPKENCE COMMITTED ON THE HIGH 8EAS OB ABROAD. For offences committed on the high seas the warrant may he the same as in ordinary cases, but describing the offence to have been committed ■ on tlu' Ilit!;]) seas, out of tlic liody of any district oi- county ot' Canada ami witiiin tlu- jurisdiction of the Admiralty (d' lOn^'land." For offences committed abroad, for which the parties may be indicted in Canada, the loarrant also may be the same as in ordinary cases, but describing the offence to have been committed ■• on land out of Canadu, to wit : at in the Kingdom of . (or. at . in tlic Island of , in the West Fndies. or at . in the East Indies, " or as the case may be.) V..— {Section 5(12.) SU.MMONS TO A PERSON CHARGED WITH AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE. ( "anada, '\ rroviucc of , j- * 'oinity of , J To A. IV. of , (labourer) : Whereas you have this day heeu charged before the undorsigned , a justice of the peace in and for the said coiinty of , for that you on . at (stating shortly the offence) : Tliese are therefore to command you, in Her Majesty's name, to he and appear before (me) on . at o clock in the (fore) noon, at . or before such other j\istice Of justices of the peace for the same county of . as sjiall tlicii lie there, to answer to the said (diarge. and to be further dealt with according to law. Herein fail not. <uven under (my) haiul and seal, this day of . in the .^*''"' , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal.] J. P., (JVame of coun'y.) 138 IMlACTirAI, (illUK TO M AdISTHATES. F. — (Section r)!)'}.) WAKHANT IN THE I'lliST INSTANCE TO AI'I'KEIIENil A I'EUSON CllAKUED WTl'll AN INItlCTAHI.E Oh'h'ENCE. ''aiiiida. ) J'voviiu'i' ol' . >■ ('ouiity of , 3 To all and any of tlic coiistalilcs and oIIut iioacf oftici'i's in the said county of Whcivas A. U, of , {labourer), lias this day been charged uiion oath licforc the undersigned , a justice of the peace in and for the said county oi' . for that lie, on . at . did (t&c, stating shortly the offence) : These are there- fore to command you, in Her Majesty's name, forthwitli to appre- hend till' said A. H.. and to liring liim before (me) (or some otlu'r justice of the peace in and for the said county of ). to answer unto the said charge, and to be further dealt with according to law. Given under (7?(j/) hand and Hcal, this day of . in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. .1. S.. [seal.] J. P.. {Name of county.) G.— {Section 5G;3.) warrant when the summons is disobeyed. Canada, ^ Province of , >• County of , J To all or any of the constables and other peace officers in the said county of Whereas on the day of . (instant or hist pa.st) A. H.. of , was (diarged before {me or us.) the undersigned {'r name the justice or justices, or as the case may he), (a) justice of tlie jieace in and for tlie saiil county <>{' j , for that (&e., as in th". suinmonx) ; and whereas 1 {or he the said justice of the peace, or we or t lu^y the said justices of the peace) did then issue {my, our, liis or their) summons to the said A. I).. oniiiiKiiiiliii;;' liiiii. ill lli'i' >riijcsty"s ikiiiic to he ;iiiil !i|i|ici(r lii'loi'c {iiie) nil III o'clock ill tlic [lore) noon, ill . or lu'lorc siicli oi lici' jusiicc oi- jusliccs of t lie iicacc •■i^ sli MiM liu'ii li,' iliT.'. lo aiisw.T to till' said cliarii-.' ami lo be t'lii'liiT (ictli wiih ac ■ ir.liiin' lo law; ami wlc'i'i'as i h;' saiil A. IJ lia> iK'U'lccicil lo lio or appear at the lime and place appointed in ami liy llie ^aid ^uiiiinoiis. allli<uin'li it lias now been prowd to (me) up. Ml oath th:it liie >aid siimiuKiis was dulv served upon thi' said A. I). : Til '^ ■ are I li 'ivt'orc to coniiuand you in Iter .Majesty's name, forlhwitii to apprehend the said A. H.. and to liriiiL;- him he- I'ore (me) or s;,nii. otli ■!• jiisiee of ih' p,'a-e in and for lit' said "•"•""y "I' . lo aii>wer liie said (diari;-e. and lo lie furl her dealt w illi aeeonliiiL;' to law. (riven under (mij) iiand and seal, this day of . in the yctyy . at in the couiily aforesaid. •I. S.. [seal.] J. P.. {Xame of county. y If. — Section ')(i'>. ENDORSEMENT IN BACKING A \^ARRANT. ( 'anada. J'roxince of , County of J Wliemis proof upon oalh has this day been made before lue . a Justice of the peace in and for the said county of .tliat the uan.eof .1. S. t.> ihe within warrant sub.scribo.i i.s.if tlu' ;l.andwr,i,ii. of the jnslice of .ho peace witl.in luentioued ■ I do :thcrcfure hereby auihorixe W. T.. who brings to me this wan-ant and all other persons to whom this warrant was orio-inallv directed or Uy whom i, n.ay he lawfully exocute-L and also all peace office x '', \'\'' r' ::"■"•; "' > ^^ ----ute the sanle w.thin the said last mentioned county. (iiven inider my hand, this dav of • <,, .,, . . "*'•> '" , III llieyear ' *y ■ 111 the county aforesaid. J. S.. ^. P., (iVawie of county.). 10 140 I'UACTICAI. .;rll>K rn MAdlSTUATES. WAKKANl' T'l SKAltCll. ('aiiiiiUi. ^ l'rii\'iiuT of . r ( 'nUllty lit' , J Wl.,.,va-^,tap|K.a">nntlu.oathofA. n.of . tl.alllKMV i. roasoM tu siis,,..ct ihat {Dcmb,' tlun<,s 1o b.' mirrhed for. and ofience. in respect of ivhich search is made) arc coiiccali'd iu '' 'Plus i. tlu'ivfoiv. t.. autlH.riz." ai.'l nM,uiiv y..u to .■nl.'V Ixtwocn ,1,, hour> oUas the /iistice shall direct) \uio llu- sai.l ]>rvuM^vs. ainl ,,,s.-a.vl, for tlu. sai.l things, ami to l.rii.g tlu' saiur Mnvr mm, sdiiic tulicr justice'. Dated at (lav of ■ ii> '1'*' .^■'■'" ill the sai<l county of iii- To .1. S.. J. P.. (iA^flMU' 0/' county). of j._(Seci(on 5(i!»). INKOIOIATION TO OHTAIN A SKAHCll WAUKANT. Canada. Province of County of ;! The intorniation ot A. n., oi county (i/eoman). tiikeii this t c n '•' , ' ,iu the year ■ 1»'<'"'^> me. J. S. Esqunv. a iustiee of the peace, in an.l for the county, of ' who savs that (£>escrihe things to be searched for and offence mrespe>t of wMck search is made), have heen stoU-n. (or as the case may h.. ,,„., „,at he has just and reasouahU. ..ausc to sns,.eet. and sus,,eH. ,,,,, tue said goods and chattels, or sonu' part of them are coneealr in'the (dwelling-house. &c.) of C. D.. of • i" the sanl ..ountv (Here add the causes of suspicion, whatever they may b) . Wlu.rcl"ore (he) prays that a s..arch .arrant nu^y h' granted to ADIHTKl.NAI. KdHMS. 141 liiin 111 M'lircli tlic ('hvellinij house, d-c ) lA' thcsniil ( '. I),, as ai'nre- >aiil. till' iIk' -:iiil udiiils and cliatti'ls so uiilawt'ully- stulcn. (or as the case miuj be), a^ alnroaiil. SwniMi (0;' allii'iiu'.l) lii'lWri' nil' ilu' day and ycai' tirst aluivc nien- tidiicil. al . in llir said ('(iniity (d' . J. S.. .7. P.. {Name of county.) AI'IMTloNAI- I'olJMS. liKl'.isriliiN. Ill' Cii.NSTAm.K <ilt iil'MKIi IKACK nlTICKlt, 111'' SKHVICI', 1)1' SIMM. INS. ( 'anada. U'ri'Nincc 111' , IC'iiunty (or. District, etc.) di) I ill' d('|iii^itii>ii iif A. 1!.. nf laUi'n Fal ' in tln'^aid {County) of tliis day id' A. !>.. 1S!I . Ixd'uri' iiu-. tlu- iniU'iNi^'iH'd. a Jnsticc ui' ilu' jicaci' (dp. as the case may be), lor tin- ■paid {county) nT wlm lu'inn' duly swnni dutli dt'|iosi' and say lliat al in llio {county). <il' on Ih! day 111' he tlio said A U. did serve (M). f witli ih;' smiiiiions licri'imto aniicxcil n'arU'cd A. ov. icithin set forth). \>y iK-livorin-;- a diiplicaU' llu'ivot' to liinitlu' luid CD.. HI jirrson. [ur. tjy leavin'j a duplicate thereof, for him th". lid ' '.!>., at his last, (m- most usual) place of abode, to wit. at Xo. treet, -« icith an inmate thereof apparently not under si.itecn ears of aye.] I'alvi'ii and swoi-n. Iii'ldrc mi'. ) it ihis dav ,' Sr A.D. ls;i . ■ ) A. B. 142 l'l!A( TliAL t:\ IHE I'l' MAMSCIiATKS. IiYI.\(i liKCl.AKAI'ltiN. IN (ASKS nP I'KltSo.NA 1, IN.II ItlES. (1) ('illKlilll. ") ri'iixilUT of >• <'in\t]\y(^iu\ District, eti:.) n\') ■ I, ('. !>.. nf ill ilic -;ii(l {County) ot (1(1 lici'cliy -olciiiiily ;iii(l --inccrcly (Ircliirc iliai [Here set out the statement in the renj irords used.J Ttikci! lict'tirc inc. ill lliis I I ^ (liiy ..f A.D. isii y ■'■ ' ■ One (if llci' .Maji'siys justices of the peace for 1 lie said (County) of (1) No particular form of this declaration is necessary: bnt it maybe somewhat lil^e the above. The iirincijial intrredienis of such a declaration, in order to render it admissable in evidence a).'ainst the accused after tliL' declarant's deatli, are, 1. The cause of tlie death of the declarant must be the 8iil)ject of en(|uiry; 2. 'Jhe circuiiistances of the deatli must be the subject of the declaration ; and .'1. It must iipiiear to have been made at a time when the declarant (diccamd) was well aware of his danirer and entertained no hope of recovery. If the accused can be brought into the ])resence of the person injured, the examination should be taken in the usual form. STATK.MKNTS (iK dl' K KNC KS. l^l* EXAMPLES OF THE MANNER OF STATING OFFENCES. (0 ABANDONIN<r CHILD UNDKH TWO YHARS OF AGE. Qf^ at A. unlawfully did aliiiiuloii and expfise A., a i^liiM then under the age of two yeais, whereby the life of the said A. was and is endanj:erod ; (or " the health of the said A. has been and is permanently injured.") ABUUCTION. On at A. unlawfully did take away (ar "detain") a^'ainst her will a certain woman, to wit, B., with Intent to marry {or " eanudly know ") the said V,. ; [or "with intent to cause ^er, the said B., U> ne married to (or " earnally known by ") l'."J ABDUCTION OF AX HEIRESS. ; C)n at , A., from motives of fiiore, did nniawfidly take away 'or "detain," or "takeaway and detain") against lier will, a certain woman, lo wit. B., she then iiaving a (certain lG>:al {or "etiuitable") present absolute (or "future absolute" or "future condi- tional" or "continijent") interest in certain real {or "personal") estate, to wit (DiDrrihr the estate or propirti/), with intent to marry (or "carnally know") the said B.. [or with intent to cause her. the said B , to be married to (or '' caniallv known bv ") C] OR, On at , A, from motives of lucre, and with intent to marry (or "carnally know") a certain woman, to wit. I!., did niilawfully take away (or "detain ") atrainst lier will, her, the said r.., she then beinsr a presumptive heiress [or "co-heires-s " or " pre- snmiitive next of kin"] to C, a person then liaving a certain legal (or "eqnitalile") present absolute or " future absolute," or " future conditional " «r " contingent ") interest in certain real [or " personal"), estate, to wit. (pe'scrilii the eatutf or propt rtij. \ ABDUCTION OF A MINOR HEIRESS. <'n at A., with intent to marry [or ''carnally know") a certain woman, to wit, B., then being under (I) See Form FF of Schedule One of tlie Criminal Code, as authority for these examples. f; 1 144 l'HA( TK'AI, (il lUK I'll MA'lI^TIiATEs. tho ai^o of twenty-one years, did tViindiilt nily allure {or "take away" or "detain") tl'e said I', nut of tho |iiis.sn-Hicn and U'-'aiiiHt tiie will of C, her fatlier ("c " motlier," rtr.), slip, the said \'., ilien liavin>; a certain lejjal (tic.) interest {etc.) in certain real estate, to wit, [or " heint; a iiieanniptive lioiress. etc., to D., a person then liavin;.' a certain le^'al interest, il,:] {Folium Uh I'onyoh (J, wroTiVmg to c'lrcvv^nioi cis.) ABDUCTION OF A (llitL r.MtKU SIXTHEN. On at , A. unluwl'nlly did taki' ((((• " cause to be taken ") a certain nnniarried j^iil, to wit, B., then und.er the ajie of sixteen years, out of the possession and avrninst tiie will i»f C, her father [or " mother" or " a person iiaving the la« fid care and cluirge of her, the said B."). AI'.o.MINAI'.LI': CKM.MKS. (1) BKSl'IAMTY. A., on at , with a certain inun^ ("uni/ otlnr liiiroj creoiim'') nn^awi'uWy, wickedly, and a^^ainst the order of nature, did have a venereal all'air, and then aiul there unlawfully, wickedly, and ajiainst the order of nature, did, with the said mare, comnut and per- petrate ihat detestable and ahonunable ('rime of bngjzery. SODOMY. A., on at ■ ' - unlawfully did assault, and then and there unlaw'.uUy, wickedly, and a^rainst the order of nature, have a venereal affair with and carnally know B., and then ami there unlawfully, wickedly, and a^aiuf-t the order of nature, with tlie :^;iiil B., did commit and perpetrate that detestable and abominable crime of iniL'- gery. ATTEMPT TO COMMIT SODOMY. A., on at unlawfully did assault B., and then and there unlawfully did attempt to wickedly, aiil against the order of nature, have a venereal affair with and to carnally kim" and commit and perjietrate, with the said B.. that detestable and ah. niii:- able crime of buggery. ABORTION. (2) On at , A., with inteii thereby to procure the miscarriage of a certain woman to wit, oneH-,il:^ (1) For " Indecent Assaults," see p. 14S, po,'!<. (2) For " Concealmoi:' of Birth," see p. 157, po.it. STATEMENTS ii|' oFKENCES. 1 IJ unlawfully iulniinistcr to (or " imiish U> \m tiikoii l>y"') lier tli(( sai.l 1^., a c.t- taiii ilrii;: [or "a certain noxious thing") to wit. [Ihm-rihr lli,' driuj itrmixiinm Ihiiltj iisal- and uhiitinu lite 'lUanlltil.) OR, Qn at , A., witii inttMit tliereliv to proi'iiiv tliL> ini.s('arria.ri' of a certain woman, to wit, o:ih B., did nnlaw- fiilly use upon tiit< pnrson of the sail 15., a uerlain instrument, to wit, [Uc ncrllit till iiinlriiKii lit iisril.) 01!, On at , A., a woman, did, witli intent tlmrehy tn procnro lier own miscarria'.;<!, unlawfully administer (or " |x»rmit to bo administerod") to liorst^lf a certain drutf (or " certain noxion.s tinntj") to wit, ( 7)('«Ti'» thi <lriii/ nr i'o.i/i/ks thiiuj, itml ininlion llir inumtlh/ iimiL) Ol!, On at , A., unlawfully did Isupply (or " piocuro") a certain drir.: (or "a (iertaln noxion.s tliinji") to wit, \{DeKrri>H: mill mi'iilion thr iiuinilili/ (if il) hti the Haiil A., then knf)win<: that tlie laine wax intemled to lie unlawfully used or employed with intent to pro- loure Uw uuscarria<_'e of a certain woman, to wit, one U. [At'CESSOliY AITKR Till': FACT TO AX INDICTABLK OFFENCE, PROSIX'UTED WITH Till', I'KINCIPAL. {Ajtir lUKCvihincj the offence nf the principal nffinder, A., proceed thim) : — And that C; of well kiio\vin<r the said A. to have done band comuutted the said offence, a.s aforesaid, <li<l, after the same was so done jind committed, as aforesaid, to wit at aforesaid, on the lay and year aforesaid, (or, nn the daij of ), unlawfully pceive, comfort and assist him, the said A., in order to enable him to escape. tCCE.SSOKY AFTER THE FACT, PROSECUTED WITHOUT TH 15 PKIXCIPAL, OR WHERE THE PKINCrPAL IS UNKNOWN. At on A., (or, .lomt' perKon or lersons unkrwim h/i name), did {Describe the offence of the principal or princi- pah). And that C, of , well knowing' the said A., (or, pemou pr persona laihiown) to have done and committed the said ofl'ence, as afore- said, did, afterwards, to wit, at aforesaid, on the day and |rear aforesnid (or, on the dai/ of ), unlawfully receive coni- nrt and assist him, the said ('., (or, prrmn or per mm unknown), in order to Enable him (or them) to escai:.). in; IMlArlliAI, 1,1 lUK In MAi; ISIHAI'K'^. ACJESSOUY Al'TKll 'I'HK FACl' I'KOSKcrTKI) Al.oNK, TlIK I'lMN- CIl'Al. IlAVINli BKEN (ON\ K'Tlll). (Afbr MutiiKj IIk' jirliicijxtl ojl'i no , mitl tin prhiciiKi/ "jl'i ndi r'-i rnurirtioii, i>iii- ceeO lhn» ) ; — Andtliat C, woU knowing; the fiiiiil A. to hiivc lUnie iiiul coiiiinitteil tlie eaid otl'enco sih aforesaid, did, afterwards, to wit, at aforesaid. ,,„ til,. day of miiawfuily receive, comfoit. and asaist liiin, the saitl A., in order to enalile iiiiii to e.^caiie. AUHON. \X on , A., unhiwfnily, wil- fully, without lenaljustiticrtlionor excuse, and without color of ri^riit, did wi lire to a cortain l)iiildin<;, to wit, a dwellingdmiiso l)e]'ini_'ini:- tf) H., and -Kitiiited in aforesaid. OH, At on , A., nnhnvfully, wil- fidly, without lenal justification or excuse, witiiout color of ri^'hl, and with intent to defraud, did 6et fire to a certain huildiii^', to wit, a store situated in aforesaid and lielonjiin^' to him the said A. 01{, At on , A., unlawfully, wil fully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of rij;ht, did set fire "to a certain sta-k of vejietahle produce (or " mineral" (»,• vej;etable fuel") to wit, (Dincrih,' tluslnck) helon<:in^: to B. ATTEMl'T TO COM-MIT AKSt)N. \t, on ' . A., unlawfully, wilfully, without lejial justification or excuse, and without color of right, did attempt to set fire to a certain building, to wit, a dwelling-house belonging to B., ami situated in atbresaid. WILFULLY t^ETTINO FIltK To CUoFS, TliEES, F/rr. At on , A., unlawfully, wilfully. ■witlioutlegaljustificationorexcu.se, and without color of right, did set lire to a certain crop (or "tree," or "wood," or " forest,"' or "coppice," or "plan- tation," or "heath," or "gorse," or "furze," or "fern"), to wit [Deixrihe iu»l give the niluaiion of the crop, etc.], the jjroperty of B. NEGLIGENTLY SETTING FIRE TO FOREST, Etc. At on , A., negligently, recklessly, and with wanton disregard of consequences (or " in violation of a certain STATK.MENTS (i|' nllEM ES. I 17 (.roviiii'ial law, to wit, "l, 'iiil niilawfiilly wet liro to a ciTtaiii fornst <»r "tree," or " inanui'ai'turod lllmlJl^r," rtc), fitiiateil {or "beiii'-'"; im the Crown ilumain (or "hind leased or lawfully lield for the [iiirpns;* nf ciittinj; timlipr,'' itc). so that the said forest («■(-■.) was injured {or ' destroyed ">• ASSACI.T. (1) On at , A. assaulted (or "assaulted and lieat" i me this deponent loc " 1'..") . ASf?AULT CAUSLNir ACTUAL BODILY 11AU^L On at , A., did make an assaidt up lU and heal and oecasion actual bodily harm to me Una dejMjnent, (or !•.)• A <_i (. i U A \' A'l' V. U A SS A L' LI'. On at , A., ill and upon un'. this deiH.nent (or " B,") did make an assault, w ith intent to commit an in- dictable ollenee, namely. { Dincrih, til' oil'divc iiiUml((l.) ( 111 On at , A„ in and upon me this deiTOuent i or "B "'), a public ollicer (or " a peace ollicer," or '' a baililf "). then and tiien* enL'ay;ed in tlie execution of his duty, to wit, while [Descriln' the iJuty heiiiij pa'jormal), did unlawfully make an assault. OK, On at , A., in and upon me this deponent (or '• B."), did unlawfully make an a.ssault, with intent to resist (oc " prevent ") the lawful ai)preliension (or "detainer") of him the said A. (or "one C") for a certain offence, to wit. (Sktte the offence.) OR, <^» at , A. did unlawfully make an assaidt upon B., who was then and there, in his (piality of a duly ; appointed bailitfof , enjra^'ed in the lawful execution of a certain : process a-ainst [or "in the making of a lawful seizure of") lands (or "jrgods"). OK, <5n at , A. did unlawfully make an assault upon me this deiwnent (or " B."), a duly appointed bailiff ^^ . «itli intent to re>cue certain troodd then and there taken and held by me this deponent (or " the said B."), under legal process (or " distress " or " seizure "). ( 1 ) For " Assaults on the Queen," see Forms under the head of " Treason," post. MS l'U.-\( TKAI, lillKE TO .MA(iISTIt ATES. OR, At on , a clay whereon a poll fur the election of mnaii-'ipal ronneillovi, for the tnunicipalhy of , was heinj: proceeded witli.A., being then and there, within two miles from the place wheresnch poll was iieinir held, did anlawfnlly make an assault ujion and beat nie this deponent, {or " B."). INDIX'KNT ASSAULT OX A I'EMALE. (1) . On at , A, nnlaAfnlly and indecently did assanlt I!., a female. INDECENT ASSAULT ON A MALE. On at , A., a male person, unlawfully and indecently did a.ssault B., another male person. ATTEMPT TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE. At on , A. unlawfully did attempt to steal one ^old watch, of tlie value of sixty-five dollars of the goods and chattels of B. OR, At on' , A. unlawf'illy did attempt, by fahe pretences, to obtain from B., one horse, of the value of seventy dullars, the property of the s.i<d 15., with intent to defraud. OR. At on , A. unlawfully did S'llicit and advise R. to unlawfully steal one jiiano of tho jzoods and chattels (if C, whereby he the said A. did unlawfully attempt to commit the indict- able offence of theft. OK, At on , A. unlawfully did attempt to co^nmit the indictable offence of bigamy [or "burglary," etc.), by then and there. (Sd nut tin' niixnin unnl in maki)}g the altcnipl.) CHOKINC OR niSAP.LING WITH INTENT To COMMIT AN INDICTAliLi: OFFENCi:. At on , A., with intent thereby to enable him the saitl A. (or " one B.") to rob C, unlawfully did attempt to choke (or "suHocate," or " strangle") the said C. OR, At on I A., with intent thereby to enable liim the said A. (oc "one B") to rob (nr " to commit a raiw upon"! (1 ) For " Indecent Acts," see p. 10", po.< STATEMENTS OP OFKEXCES. 149 ('., iinlawfiilly dicl attempt to render the said C. insensible (or " nncon- sc'ions," or " incapable of resistance "), by gagsiing (or ";_'arrottinp, or "sand- hajiging," or [.Vention the nrhial minvf iinfd]). tlie said V. in a niannLT calcu- lated to choke (or "sutlbcate," or "strangle"] the said ('. HRUGGING WITH INTENT TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE 01"FE>'CE. \t on , A, with intent thereby to enable him the said A. (or "one B.") to rob (or " to commit a rape upon") C, nnlawfnlly <lid apply and administer (or " attempt to apply and adminis- ter"') to (or "cause to he taken by") the said C. certain chlorofbrin ["r " laudanum," or ( Mention the gtvpefying or over powering drug, molltr or thimj Hsal.) ] BIGAMY. (1) On at , A., being already tlieretofore, married to and having as and for his lawful wife (or "her lawful husband"), one !'>., did unlawfully marry and go through a form of marriage with and take to wife (or "hus\>aud ") another '.vomau, (or " man"), to wit, C, and, to her (or " him ") the said C, was then and there married,— his, the said A's, said first wife (or " her, the said A's, said first husband", being still r>., alive. BLASPHEMOUS LIBEL (2) On at A., unlaw fully did pub- lish a certain hlas[)liem()us, indecent anil |)iofane lilxd of and concerning the Holy Scriptures and tin- Christian religion, in one part of v>hich said libel there were and are con tai noil, amongst other things, certain blasphemous, indecent and profane matters and things, of and coiicerniiig the Holy Scrip- tures and the Cliiisiian religif]n, of the tenor following, that is to say, (Here ml mil thr lihdloan ^MumyA, to the high disi)leasure of Almighty God, and to the great scandal and reproach of the Chri.>stian religion. I'.UEAKING PRISON. <>n the day of at A., being then a prisoner confined in the common gaol or piis in in and for the county (or " district") of on a criminal charge, did unlaw- (nlly, hy force and violence, break the said gaol tr prison, liy cutting and removing two iron bars of the said gaol or prison, and by also then ami there breaking, cutting and removing a (piantity of stone, parcel of the wall of the gaol or prison aforesaid, with intent thereliy, then and there, to f-et himself, the said A., at liherly. (1) For " Polygamy " see p. 177, post ; for "Feigned Marriages" see p. Kid, pott ; and for ".Soltfttnuizing Marriages unlawfully," see p. ISi-, ;>„.«/. (-') For " Defamatory Libel," see p. Vi\\poKt. 150 PKAf'TK'AL (illDE TO MAdlSTRATES, BURGLARY. At on , about the lioiir oC twelve, ot night. A., unlawfully ami bur<:larlously did break and enter tlie dwellinjr-liouse of B., there situated, with intent unlawfully and burglariously to steal the goods and chattels of the said B., then and there in the said dwellintr-house, {or " with intent to commit, in the said dwellinghouse, an indictable offen'-e, to wit." [Dairriljc the oj/rticc] ). OR, At on , about the hour of twelve, «/ tiiijhl, A., unlawfully and burglariously did break and enter the dwelling-house of B., there situated, with intent unlawfully and burglariously to steal the goods and ibatttls of the said B., then and there in the said dwelling-house ; and he the said A., having so broken and entered and then being in the said dwelling-house did unlawfully and burglariously steal twelve silver forks and twelve silver spoons of the value of forty dollars, of the goods and chattels of the said B., in the said dwelling-house then being found. OR, At on A., then being in the dwelling-house of I!., inilawfully did steal twelve silver foiks and twelve silver spoons of the vahie of forty dollars of the goods and chattels of the said B. in the said dwelling-house, and the said A., being so as aforesaid in the said dwelhng-liouse anil having rouunitted the theft aforesaid, did afterwards, to wit, on the day and year aforesaid, about tlie hour of twelve, at night, un- lawfully and burglariously break out of the said dwelling-bouse. HOUSE BREAKING. At on , A, unlawfully di'l brenk and enter hi/ ilaii, the ilwelling-house of B., here situated, and, twelvi^ silver forks cf "je value of twenty dollars, the property of the said B., tlieii and there being found therein, did then and there unlawfully stea'. OR, At en , A, unlawfully did break and enter, b;/ dnii, the dwelling-house of B., there situated, with intent to commit an indictable ollence therein, to wit, to steal the goods then and there being in the said dwelling-hoUso. BREAKING 81I0B. Krc. At on , A., unlawfully, did break and enter t:.e shop of B., there situated, and five boxes of cigars of the STATEMKNTS OK OFPEXCES. 151 Viilno of twenty dollars, the property of tlio said !>., tlieii and there being found therein, did, then and there, unlawfnlly steal. OR, At on , A., unlawfully, did break and enter a certain buildinj?, there situated, and being within the cur- tilage of and occupied with tiie dwelIin<?-hoiise of B., hut not connected with or forniinji part of the said dwellinghouse either ininiediately or by means of any covered or enclosed passage, and one horse of the value of seventy- five dollars the proi)erty of the said B., then and there in the said buildinj: did tlieii and there unlawfnlly steal. OR, ^^ on , A., unlawfully did break and enter the shop of B., there situated, with intent to commit an in- tli<ttal)le olfence therein, to wit, to steal the jioods and cliatteis of tli9 said B., then and there in the said shop. r.EING FOUiND IN A DWELLING-HOUSE, BY NIGHT. "^^ on about the hour of twelve, at nifiht, A. unlawfully did enter (or " was in " ) the dwelling-liouse of B., there r situated, with intent the goods and chattels of the said B. unlawfully to steal. BEING FOUND ARVIPZD, WITH INTENT TO BKEAK AND ENTER. > , '\' . , «" A., was found, by dav, I {or by night), unlawfully armed with a certain dangerous and offensive I weapon {m- " instrument ", to wit, [D.s-cribe !l] with intent to break and enter the dwelhng-hou.e lor a certain building) of P.. there sitmited, and to commit therem an indictable offence, to wit, unlawfully to steal the goods and chat- tels of the said B. then being in the said dwelling-house, (or building). HAVING POSSES.SION, BY NIGHT, OF H0USE-BRE\K1NG INSTRUMENTS. li ' I ,. , . . °" , A., was found, about Ihe hour of twelve, at night, imlawfully an.l without lawful excuse in nos- fcession of certam house-breaking instruments, to wit. (Dei>cr!hc them). HAVING POSSESSION, BY DAY, OF HOUSE-BREAKING INSTRUMENTS, WITH INTENT. ^^ on ::■¥!'■ 15l' I'llACTICAL (iUIDK To MAGISTRATES. BEING FOUND DISGUISED BY NIGHT. At on , A., was fomul, by nijilit, unlawfully ami without lawful excuse, with liis face masked (or "blackened"). • . . BEING TOI'XD DISGUISED, BY DAY, WITH INTENT. At on , A., was found, by day, unlawfully and without lawful jxcuse, in a certain disguise, to wit/ Difcriln- tltc ilhguise) with intent then and thereto commit an indictable oli'ence, to wit, [Mention tJir o/Zlxci). CAUSING DANGKROUS EXPLOSIONS. On tit ' , A., by a certain ex- plosive substance, to wit, unlawfully and w ilful'y did cause an explosion of a nature likely to endanger life, (or "of a nature like- ly to cause injury to property.") CONSPIRACY TO CAUSE A DANGEROUS EXPLOSION. On at ,A.p.nd B. nn'awf'iily did conspire, confederate and agree together to cause, by a certain explosive substance, to wit, an explosion of a nature likely to endanger life (or " likely to cause t^erious injury to property.") :MAKING, ok POSSESSING EXPLOSIVES. On at , A. unlawfully am! wilfully did make {or "have possession" or " control of") a certain explosive substance, to wit, with intent, by means thereof, to endanger life (or ''to cause serious injuty to profierty" or '' to enable C, by means tiiereof, to endanger life," or "cause seriouB injury to property.") OR, On at A. unlawfully did make (or " knowingly have possession " or "control of ") a certain exj)losive siili- stance, to wit, , under such circumstances as to give rise to a reasonal)le suspicion that his making [or "liaving possession " nr " control of") it was not for a lawful object, the said circumstances being as follows: (Rtlate them.)] CAUSING BODILY INJURY, BY EXPLOSION. On at , A., by the explosion of a certain explosive substance, to wit, , unlaw fuily STATEMKNTS Ml' i iI'l'ENf'ES. 15;{ ilid Imrn, (or '• maim," or " distigiire," or "disable," or "do grievious bodily liarui to ") B. CAUSING EXPLOSION, WITH INTENT TO INJURE. At on , A., witli intent tiioie- \<y to burn (or " maim," or " disiij-'ure," or "disalilo," or " do <:rievous bodily barm to") B. (or "any person "j nnlawfully did cause a certain exi'losive substance, to wit, , to exi)lode. SENDING AN EXl'li<)SlVE SUBSTANCE, WITH INTKNTTO INJUR K. -^t' on , A., with intent there- by to burn {nr " maim," or "disfi^'nre," or " disalile," or "do p-ievous bodily barm to") B., unlawfully did send (or "deliver") to, (or "cause to be taken into the possession of" or "to be received by ") the said B., a certain ex- plosive substance, to wit, I'LAdNc; DESTRUCTIVE FLUIDS, Etc., WITH INTENT TO INJURE. ') ' 0" , A ., with intent thereby to burn lor maim," or "disfigure," or " disable," or " do grievous bodilv harm to")B., unlawfully did F>"t and lay, in a certain place, to wit, (D,srn7;<- the place) a certain tluid [or "destructive" or "explosive substance") to wit, {Describe the jiuid or siihHlnnce.) I CASTING DESTRl t'TIVE FLUIDS, Ere, WITH INTENT TO INJURE. . ^^ , °" . A., with intent there- by to burn (or " maim," or " disfigure," or "disable," or " do grievous bodily liarm to") B., unlawfully did cast and throw at and u[X)n the .said B., a cer- tain corrosive fluid (or " destructive "or " explosive substance ") to wit ( Dck- crtlie the Ihdd or >'iihMance ti/'ed.) COMBINATION IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE. .■^V ,. , °" A., unlawfully con- spired, combined, agreed and arranged with B., C., and D., and with the Company, to unduly limit tlie facilities for trans- port:ng,(or "producing," or "supplying," or "storing," or " dealing in "or " manufacturing,") cotton goods (etc.).. a subject of trade and commerce. OR At „ • I , . , *^" -A., unlawfully con- spired, combined, agreed and arranged with B., C, and D., and with the 154 I'HACTir.M, (illDK TD MAillSTRATES. COMMON BAWDY-HOUSE. ^j. on > aiiil 'J" 'in'l ^^t divem (Java anil times since that date. A, and 15.,— the wife of tlie ^aid A.,— unlaw- fully did keep and maintain a disorderly house, to wit, a common bawdy- )'ouse, bv keepins? and maintaining,' a certain house (or '-room," or " set of rooms " lie. ). situate and being , for purposes of itrostitution. COMMON GA^IIXG-HOUSE. ^i on I and on and at divers other days and times since that date. A., (or "A., B., and C.,") unlawfully did keep and maintain a disorderly house, to wit, a common uamin'r house, by keepinji and maintainin«; for gain a certain house {or '• room" elr.), situate and being to which persons did and do resort for the purpose of playing at games of chance. OR [Commence as ahore) unlawfully did keep and maintain a disorderly house, to wit, a common gaming-house, by keeping {or " using") for gain, a certain house {or " room " (•(<■.), situate and being for playing therein at games of chance and mixed games of chance and skill. an ■ in which a bank was and is kept by one or more of the players exclu- sively of the others, {or " hi irhicli, in the (james played therein, the chances are not alike fuvoruhle to all the players.") COMMON NUISANCE, ENDANGEiaNG LIFE, kc. Q .jt , and on and at divers other days a . times before and since that date, A., unlawfully, and injur- iously did, and he does yet continue to {Set out the particular act or omimon, complained of) and thereby unlawfully did commit and does continue to commit a common nuisance endangering the lives (or " safety " or " health ") of the public. COMMON NUISANCE, OCCASIONING PERSONAL INJURY. p^^ on and on and at divers other days and times before and since that date. A., unlawfully and injur- iously did, and he does yet continue to {Set out the particular act or omisiti(m complained of) and thereby unlawfully did commit and does continue to commit a common nuisance by which the public were and are obstructed in the exercise or enjoyment of a right common to all Her Majesty's subjects, to wit, {Set out the common right obstructed) and which common nuisance dul at afw/esaid on the day of occasion actual injury to the person of B. STATEMENTS <1P (IPKEXCES. 155. OR At on , and on and at divers other days ai(d times before and since that date, A., unlawfully and injnr- ously did and he does yet continue to (Set out the particular act or omixitlon complaiiinl of) and thereby unlawfully did commit and does continue to commit a common nuisance, endangering the property (or "comfort") of the public and which common nuisance did at aforesaid on the day of occasion actual injury to the person of B. CHEATING AT PLAY, Etc. At . on , A", unlr*wfully, and' with intent to defraud B., did cheat in playing at a game with cards (or "dice.") COININ( i AND COUNTERFEITING. COUNTERFEITING CURRENT SILVER COINS. -^t on A., did unlawfully m ake (or "besrin to make") and counterfeit twenty pieces of false and counterfeit coin resembling (or " apparently intended to resemble and pass for ") current ^ silver dollars \or " half dollars," or " ten cent pieces.") IMPORTING OR EXPORTING COUNTERFEIT COIN. /^* 0^ , A., did unlawfully an^t without lawful authority or excuse* import and receive 'nto Canada (or '■ ex- port from Canada"), twelve pieces of false and counterfeit coin resembling (or "apparently intended to resemble and pass for") current silver dollars he the said A., then and there well knowing the same to be counterfeit. MAKING COINING INSTRUMENTS. L."^* °" ' A., unlawfully and Irithout lawful authority or excuse, did make, (or " mend," or" begin or pro- feed to make or mend ") one puncheon (or " counter puncheon " etc.), in and Ipon which there was then made and impressed (or " which would make Ind impress " or " which was adapted and intended to make and impress ") Ihe fi.L'ure and apparent resemblance of one of the sides, to wit, the head-side of a current silver dollar. • BHINGINc; COINING INSTRUMENTS INTO CANADA. I, "^^ , .„ ,, ,, ?" . , A., unlawfully, know- ingly and without lawful authority or excuse, did conve" out of Hsr Majesty's 'Mints into Canada, one puncheon (or -'counter-puncheon," or "matrix" etc ) Bsed or employed in or about the coining of coin. 11 ISt; PRACTICAL OlTDK TO MA(i ISTUATKS. CLIPPING CUlMtKNT COIN. ,\^ on . -■^•1 *'''! nnlawfiilly impair (or "aiminish," or " ligliten,") twelve pieces of cnrront silver coin c'iiUed dollars, with intent that eiV(!h onhe said twelve pieces so inii>aired, (or " diminished," or " li;_'htenod") miuht i)ass for a current silver dollar. DEFACING CUKRENT COIN, AND TENDERING SAME. j^+ OP , A., unlawfully diii deface ono jiiece of cnrront silver coin, called a dollar, by then and there .stampiuii thereon certain names {or " words,") to wit, , and did .afterwards unlawfutly tender the said current silver coin, so defaced as afore- said. POSSES.SIN(f COUNTKRFEIT COIN, WITH INTF.NT. j^^ on . A., unlawfully, had in hiscustodv and pr.ssession twelve pieces of counterfeit coin resenihliuir ('/)• ' apparentiv intended to resemble, and i)a8S for ") current silver dollars, with intent to utter the same, he the said A., then well knowing the same to he .fouuterfeit. COUNTr.RFI'.ITING CURRENT COPPFR COIN. . 0,1 , A., unlawfully, did make and counterfeit two hundred pieces of fal.-e an.i counterfeit coinresen. bl'insi (or •' apparently intended to resemble and pass for") the current copper icoin^called a one cent piece. COUNTERFEITING FOREKlN COIN'. ^^ on - -^v unlawfully, di.l luile (or « he-'in to make ") and counterfeit coin resembling (or " apparently intended to resemble and pass for") the silver coi.. of a foreign country, to wit, tiie silver coin of the United States of America, called a dollar. BRINGING COUNTERFEIT FORF-IGN COIN INTO CANADA. ^ on . -■^•. unlawfully and without lawful authoritv or excuse, did bring into (or " receive in ") Canada. wentv pieces of false and counterfeit coin resembling (or "apparently intended to resemble and pass for") the silver coin of a foreign country, to wit the silver coin of the United States of America called a dollar, he the said A , then well knowing the same to be counterfeit. UTTERING COUNTERFEIT COIN. on . A., unlawfully, did .utter to B., one piece of counterfeit coin resembling [or " apparently intended STATE.ME.NTS (pF (IKI'ENCES. 157 to resomblc uiul pass for'M tlie current silver coin called » dolUr, [or tlie cui- renlcoiipor coin <'alled one cent,) knowin;^ it to he (lounterfeit. UTTERING LIGHT COI> At on , A. nnUwfiilly did litter, as hein^ current, a certain silver coin, to wit, a silver dollar of le.«s tliiin linviiil wei'jrlit, he the said A. well knowin>: the said coin to have hecM inipaired (!■■ " diiiiinisiied," ")■ " lij,'htoned ") otherwise than by lawful wear. ■■ . UTTi;RIN(i U.NCUllKKNT COIN. At on , A., unlawfully and with intent to (IcCrand, did utter, as heiiif; current,, a certain silver coin, not liein^i a current silver c(;in, Imt re.senil)linj:> in size, liirure and color, a current silver dollar, and heini; of less value than a current silver dollar. UTTERING MEDALS, Etc., AS CURRllNT fOIN. At on " , A., nnlawf'idiy and with intent to defraud, did utter, as being a current silver dollar, a certain medal (or " piece of metal") resembling, in size, figure and color, a current silver dollar, and being of less value than a current silver dollar. COUNTE RFEIT I NG SEA LS. At on A., unlawfully did make an i counterfeit a certain public seal, to wit, the public seal of the Dominion of Canada. UTTERING COUNTERFEIT SEALS- ■At oil A., knowing a certain seal, to wit, a seal jmrporting to be the public seal of the Doininion of Canada, to be counterfeited, did unlawfully use the said cornterfeit seal. COUNTERFEITJNii REVENUE STAMPS. ^t on A., unlawfully and fraudulently diC counterfeit a certain revenue stamp, to wit, (di'scribe it). SELLINti COUNTERFEIT REVENUE STAMPS. -^t on A., unlawfully and knowingly, did sell (or -'expose for sale" or "utter" or "use") a certain counterfeited revenue stamp, to wit, {descrihe if). CONCEALMENT OF BIRTH. (1) *^" at , A., was delivered of a child, and (hat, subsequently, on at aforesaid the saiddiild being dead, the said A. (or "B") unlawfully did dispose of the (1) For " Neglect to procure Assistance in Chilibirth " see p. 175, posi. 168 PRACTICAL aUIDE TU MACIISTKATES. dead body of the said child, by secretly burying it (or State the actml mcaiiK u$ed), with intent to conceal the fact that the said A. had been delivered of such child. CONSPIRACY TO BRING FALSE ACCUSATION OF CRIME. ^(. ,,n A. B. and M. B.,— his wife,— C. I), and E. F„ unlawfully did conspire, combine, confederate and agree together to prosecute (1. H. for an alleged offence, to wit, upon u false charge and accusation, falsely charging and accusing that he the said G. H. had, then, lately before, unlawfully assaulted, ravished and carnally known the said M. B., without her consent, they the said A. 15., M. B„ C. 1>. and E. V. then well knowing the said G. II. to be innocent of the said alleged offence. That, afterwards, at aforesaid, on the day and year afore- said, the said A. B. and M. B., (his wife,) C. D. and E. F., in pursuance of their said conspiracy, did attend together before .T. N., Fsciuire, one of Her Majesty's .Justices of the Peace for tlie District of , to whom they the said A. 1'.. and M. B., (his wife,) ( '. D. and K. F., .lid, then and there, make the said false charge and accusation, falsely charging and accusing the said G. H. with and of the rape aforesaid ; and, then and there, before the said .T, N., she the said M. B., in the presence of and in company with the said A. B, C D. and E. F., and in further pursuance of the said conspiracy, did make her written and sworn information and complaint, falsely charging and accusing that the said d. II. had, then, lately before, unlawfully assaulted, ravished, and carnally known her, the said .M. 1".., without her consent. That, afterwards, to wit, in tho Court of Queen's Bench (or [Name the court] as tlie ca^e in'uj he) of tlie province of , holden at , in and for the district (or " county ") of , on in the year aforesaid, they, the said A. B. and M. B., (his wife,) ( '. D. and E. F., in further pursuance of their said conspiracy, did cause and procure to be falsely laid and exhibited, before the Grand .Fury then and there sworn he- fore the said Court, a bill of indictment falsely charging and accusing the said (i. H. witti and of the rape aforesaid; which said bill of indictment was by the Grand .lury, then and there, retu rned into the said Court, thus endorsed :— " No Bdl."' CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE. At on , A. B. and C, unlawfully, did conspire, combine, confedeiate and agree together to commit a certain indictable ofifence, to wit, the crime of arson (or " burglary " or " aggravatwl assault," or " rape," or " forgery," etc.), by then and there conspiring, com- bining, confederating, and agreeing together to unlawfully, etc.. set fire to [or " unlawfully break and enter" or, etc, (Describe the crime agreed up nn STATEMEATS OF OFFENCES. 1,")!) and mentiun Ihf proptrtii or penon, or both, as the case may be, to be affected Iherthij.) ] (A clause nu.y be added setting out the overt acts of the con- spiracy.) CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD. At on , A., B. and C. did, unlawfully, conspire together to defraud the public (or"D") by deceit, [or " falsehood," "r " by the fraudulent means following, to wit,'' {Set out the fraudulent means agreed upon], CRIMINAL BREACH OF CONTRACT. At on A., unlawfully and wil- fully did break a certain eoitract, to wit (describe it), theretofore made by him, well knowing 'or "having reasonable cause to believe") that the probable conseciuences of his so doing would be to endanger human life (or '■ cause serious bodily injury,' or "expose valuable property to destruction," or "serious injury "). CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST. •^^ o" , A., then being — under and by virtue of the will of B.— a trustee of certain property, to wit (Describe it), for tjie use and benefit of ( ., D., E. and F., did, unlawfully, and in viola- tion of his trust, convert the same to a use not authorized by the said trust, with intent to defraud. DEFAMATORY LIBEL. ^" at A. unlawfully did publish on, and of and concerning B., a defamatory libel, in a certain letter directed to C, which libel was in the words following, that is to say (Set out the part of the letter complained of a.« libellous), and which libel was written in the sense of imputing that the said B. was yas the case maij be.) PUBLISHING A DEFAMATORY LlBEu KNOWING IT TO BE FALSE. i ,. ?". »t A, unlawfully did pub- , hsh, in a certain newspaper called the , a defamatory libel, on. and of and concerning B., he the said A. well knowing the same to be false, which libel was contained in the said newspaper in uu article therein hea.lBd (or 'commencing with") the following words, to wit, (Set out the heading, or the commencing, and, if necessary, the concluding words of the libel, or otherwise give so much detail as is sufficient to furnish the accused with reason- able rvformatwn as to the part of the publication to be relied on against him), and which hbelv.M written in the sense of imputing that the said B. was (as trie case may be-) 160 T'liACTrCAI, (IlIUK T(l ,M AO ISTIiATKS. EXTOUTION BY DEFAMATORY LIBEL. On at , A., nnlavfiiUy did publish (or "threaten to publish" ur "LtFer to abstain from publishing" tic.) a ilofiiniatorj' libel of and ooni'eniinjz I?., with intent, thereby, then and tiiere, to extort money from the said B., (m- " from C") OR, On at A, unlawfully dill pub- lish (or "threaten to i)ublish" or "offer to abstain from or prevent the pnbli.shins.'of') a defamatory libt'l of and concorniuir B., with, intent thereby, then and there, to indut-e t>.e said B., [or "one i'."), to confer upon, (or "procure for") the said A., (or "one D,") a certain appointment (or '•otlice") of profit (or " trust") to wit, {^f(•)^tiot) the uppoiiitiiinit or ojlicr in qxu-Mlon.) OR, On at A, uidawfully did pub- lish (nr '• tlirealcn to publish") a defamatory Hbel of and corii'ernin>; B. in conseiiuence of the said A. having been refused money theretofore demanded l)y him the said A. of and from tiie siud B. (or " in consecjuence of the said A. having been refused a certain appointment, i/c, theretofore sought by hi\ii the said A., of or from or at the hands or by the influence of the said B.") i>i:fili-;.mi:nt ov wo.mii.n and (iiiiLs. PKoCUUINt; DEFILEMENT OF A WdMAN UNDEli AUE. On at A, unlawfullly did procure [or "did attempt to procure") B, a girl, (or "woman") then under tiie age of twenty-one yir-ars, to wit, of the ago of years, and not being a prostitute nor of known immoral character, to have uniauful car- nal connection with another i)erson (or "other persons"). ENTICIN^(i A WOMAN, UNDEll AGE, TO PROSTirUTION. On at A, unlawfully did in- veigle (or " entice') B, a girl, (or " woman"), tiien under the age of twenty- one years, to wit, of tlu\ age of , and not being a prostitute nor of known immoral character, to a house of ill-fame, (or " as-signation'), fr the purjmse of illicit intercourse (or " prostitution";. CONCEALING A WOMAN SO ENTICED On at A, unlawfully and knowingly did conceal, in a house of ill-fame, (or " assignatioi»"), B. a girli (or "woman"), then being under the age of twenty-one years, to wit, of the age of years, and not being a common prostitute nor of known STATEMENTS fiK (iri'ENCES. •, 1(U iinnioial cliiiracter, slio the saiil B, luiviiiii been unlawfully inveiirled, {or "onticed") to the said house of ill-fame {or " ussignatiou") for the pur- jwse of illicit intercourse {or " prostitution".) PUOCUKING A WOMAN TO BECOME A PROSTITUTE. On at A, unhuvfully di<l pro- raro (or "attoiupt to procure"), B, a womau {or "<2;irl") to become, within Canada, (or "out of Canada"), a common prostitute. PROCURING A WOMAN'js DEFILEMENT BY THREATS. Oil at A, unlawfully and by threats (or "intimidation") did procure {or "attempt to procure") B, a woman {or •'s,'irl") to have unlawful carnal connection within Canada (or "out of Canada") DEFILIN(i BY ^IRANS OF DRUGS. OU at ' A, unlawfully did apply (or "administer") to and cause to be taken by B, a woman, (or "sirl"), acertiin drug, t(i wit, (or "some in toxicatinii liiinor,' or some other matter or tliini.', ax the cow mai/ he), with in tent to stujiefy (or 'overpower") her the said' 15, so as thereby to enable the said A (or " a cer- tain man, to wit C,") to have unlawful carnal connection with her the said B. CONSPIRACY TO INDUCE A WOMAN TO COMMIT ADULTERY OR FORNICATION. On * "t A, and B, unlawfully did conspire, combine, confe;lera'.e, and a>.'ree tofrether, unlawfully, and by false pretences, false representations, and other fraud ulent means to induce ( ', a woman, to commit adultery (or " fornication") with D. EXTORTIf)N, BY THREAT.S TO ACCUSE OF CERTAIN SERIOUS; CRIMES. (!) '■^' on A., unlawfully, did ac- . USB (or " threaten to accuse ") B,, of having: committed an offence punishable by law witli death (or "imprisonment for seven years or more") to wit, tnnrder, (or "for^rery," or "bur>;lary," or "bigamy," etc.), with intent' thereby to extort and gain money from the said B. OR, ^* "» A., unlawfullv,did ao- '•use^or " threaten to accuse") B. of having committed an assault wuh intent (1) For '-Threatening Letters " and " Demandini: with threats," see p. 1S8. i poM. lor "Threats to Murder," see p. l7i,post. 162 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. to commit a rape, (or "attempted or endeavored to commit a rape"), with intent thereby to extort and gain money from the said B. OR, At on A., unlawfully, did ac- cuse (or " threaten to accuse ") B. of having committed an infamous oflFence, to wit, the abominable crime of buggery, with intent thereby to extort and gain money from the said B. OR. At on A., with intent to ex- ■♦ort and gain money from B., unlawfully did cause the said B., to receive a certain document accusing {or " threatening to accuse") the said B., of hav- ing counselled and procured one C, to commit an infamous offence, to wit, the abominable crime of bugpery, he the said A. then well knowing the con- tents of the said document, which is as follows : (Set out the document.) EXTORTION, BY THREATS TO ACCUSE OF OTHER '"RIMES. At on , A., unlawfully did accuse (or " threaten to accuse ") B., of having committed the offence of poly- gamy (or "libel" or "aggravated assault " or " gaming in stocks," or " frequent- ing bucket shops," or " corrupting jurors," or " obtaining money by false pre- tences," or "defrauding creditors" etc), with intent, thereby, to extort and gain money from the said B. FALSE PRETENCES. At on , A., unlawfully, and by false pretences, did obtain from B., five barrels'of flour of the value of with intent to defraud. OBTAINING EXECUTION OF VALUABLE SECURITY BY FALSE PRETENCES. At on , A., unlawfully, and by false pretences, did cause and induce B., to execute (or " make " or " accept," or "endorse" or "destroy "i a certain valuable security, to wit, a promissory note for one hundred dollars, with intent thereby to defraud and injure tlie said B. OBTAINING PASSAGE BY FALSE TICKET. At on , A., fraudulently, un- lawfully, and by means of a false ticket (or " order "), lid obtain (or " attempt to obtain ") a passage on a carriage or car of the Montreal Street Railway Company, (or, as the case muy be)- STATEMENTS OF OFFENCES. 163 FALSE ACCOUNTING BY CLERK. \^ on • A., then being a clerk in the employ of B., did, unlawfully, with intent to defraud, destroy (or " alter," or " mutilate," or " falsify ") a certain book (or " paper," or " writing,'' or "valuable security,") to wit, [describe the book, etc.), belonging to (or "in the possession of," or "received by the said A., for and on behalf of") the said B. FALSE WAREHOUSE RECEIPT. j^t on A., then being the keeper of a warehouse, etc., for storing timber, etc., unlawfully, knowingly, wilfully and with intent to misled (or "injure." or "defraud,") did give to B. a certain writing purporting to be a receipt for, (or "acknowledgment of"), certain goods, to wit, (describe thtm), as having been received into his the said A's warehous«, etc., before the said goods had been received by him, the said A., as aforesaid. FALSE STATEMENT BY A PROMOTER, DIRECTOR, PUBLIC OFFICER OR MANAGER OF A PUBLIC COMPANY. At on , A., being then a pro- moter, (o?" "director," or "public officer," or "manager") of a certain body corporate {or " public company ") then intended to be formed and to be called , (or " then actually existing and called ") did, unlawfully, make, circulate, and publish (or " concur in mak; ing, circulating, and publishing ") a certain prospectus (or " account " or "statement,") well knowing the same to be false in certain material particu- lars, to wit (slate them), with intent to induce certain persons unknown, to this deponent, to become shareholders or partners (or "with intent to deceive and defraud the members, shareholders and cieditore,") of the said body, corporate {or " public company.") FALSE TELEGRAMS. At on , A., unlawfully, and with intent to defraud, did cause and procure a certain telegram, in the words and figures following, [Set out the telegram) to be sent, (or "delivered,") toB., as being sent by the authority of C, knowing that it was not sent by such authority, and with intent that the said telegram should be acted on as being sent by the said C. SENDING FALSK TELEGRAMS, OR LETTERS, WITH INTENT TO IN.IURE OR ALARM. /^^ on , A., unlawfully and with intent to injure (or "alarm") B., did send (or "cause" or "procure to be sent") to the said B., a certain telegram (or "letter,") containing matter 1(1-1: I'UAf'TlCAL (il'IIiE TU MAUISTHATES. which he the saiil A., know to be false, to wit, a telegram {or " letter,") in the words and figures following, (.>>< out the telegrum or Ultir). FALSIFYING REGISTERS. At on , A., unlawfully, did destroy («r ''deface " or " injure ") a certain register then and there lawfully kept as the register of births {or '"baptisms," <>r " marriages," or " doatlis " or " burials"; of Ihe parisli of OR, At on , A., unlawfully, did insert in a certain register then and theielawfully keptusthe rejiister of births, (.'(", of tlie parish of a certain entry, known by him, the said A., to be false, and relating to the birth (or " marriage," uc,) of OR, At on i*., unlawfully, did eraze from a certain register then and there lawfully kept as the register of births (or " marriages," (tc ), of the parisli of a certain material part of such register, to wit, {Dcpcriie the mutLrial part i:ra:id). FALSELY CERTIFYING EXTRACTS 1<R0:\I REGISTERS. At on A., being a i)erson au- thorized and required by law to uive certified copies of entries in a certain register then and there lawfully kept as the register of births {or •' marriages'' lie), of the parish of , unlawfully did certify a certain writing to be a true copy of (or "extract from ") a certain entry in the said register, to wit, an entry of the birth (or " marriage," etc.), of FRAUD BY OFFICIAL. ^t on , A, then being a dir- ector or " manager," etc.i of a certain body corporate called did unlawfully destroy (or "alter," or "mutilate," or "falsify,") a certain book (or " pafier," or " writing," or " valuable security ") to wit, {Dincribe thi hook, etc.), belonging to the said body corporate, with intent to defraud. OR, At on A., then being a dir- ector, itc, of a certain body corporate called did unlawfully, and with intent todefraud, make(rr "concur in making") in a certain book of account, to v,it, (dcscrihi' it) of the said body corporate, a certain false entry, by then and tliere falsely entering in such book (Describe the fahe entrtj). ei STATEMENTS OF OFFENCES 165 OB, . . on . -^'i then bein<: a Jir- •tor clc, of a certain body corporate called did, unhv.vfuHy and with intent to defraud, omit {or "concur hi omitting") ceriaiu material particulars f>om a certain book of account of tl^.e said body corpo/ate, to wit, (Dm-Tibe the omimon). FKAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT BY A DEHTOIJ. .. on A. .unlawfully, and with intent to defraud his creditors, did make (or "cause to be made") a gift, {or " oonveyaiice," or " assignment," or " sale," or " transfer," or " delivery," I of Ills property, to B. OR, j^t on ^^'i unlawfully, did re- niovf, lor " conceal," or " dispose of") hie property, with intent to defraud his creditors. IRAUDULENTLY RECEIVING A DEBTOR'S PROPERTY. At on A., unlawfully, au<l with intent that B. should defraud his creditors, did receive, the property of the suid B., tlien and there given, or " conveyed," or " assigned," or " sold," or " transferred," Of "delivered,'' or "removed," or "concealed," or "disposed of") hy the said B., with intent to defraud his creditors. FRAUDULENT CONVERSION 1^' A PERSON ENTRUSTED WITH :\10NEY. At on , A.,— liavini: thereto- fore received from B., the sum of one hundred dollars, on terms reijuiring him, the said A., to pay over the same toC, — did fraudulently convert to his own use and thereby steal the said sum of money. FRAUDULENTLY DESTROYING D0( UMENT OF TITLE TO GOODS. At on , A., unlawfully, and for a fraudulent purpose, did destroy, (or "cancel" or "conceal," or "obliterate") a certain document of title to goods, to wit, (De><cribc il). FRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF STOCK. At on , A., a transfer of a certain share and interest of and in certain sto(;k, (annvily or oUur public fmtJ), transferable at the Bank, to wit. the share and interest of B., of and in ( J/en/ion the amount and description of the i^lock, df.), did unlaw- fully, and with intent to defraud, make, in the name of C, he the said C. not ICl) PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. being then the true and lawful owner of the said stock, etc., or any part thereof. : FEIGNED MARRIAGE. At on , A., did unlawfully procure a feigned and pretended marriage between himself, the said A., and a certain woman, to wit, B. " OR, At on , A., did unlawfully aid and assist B., in procuring a feigned and pretended marriage between him, the said B., and a certain woman, to wit, C. . FORCIBLE ENTRY. A, B, C, and D on unlawfully, forcibly, and with a strong hand, did enter into a certain dwelling-house situate and being at and then in the actual and peaceable possession of E, and unlawfully, forcibly, and with a strong hand, did expel and put out the said E. from the said dwelling- house, in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace. ■ -''.•■■ ■ - , ■ ■ . ,.,•-/■ .,, FORGERY. At on ^ A., unlawfully and knowingly did forge a certain document, to wit, {Describe the document by itn usual name, OT, set forth a copy of it). ■ - , UTTERING A FORGERY'. At on A., knowing a certain document, to wit, {describe it) to be forged, did unlawfully utter (or " use " or "deal with," or ''act upon," or "attempt to u«e," etc.), the said forged docu- ment, as if it were genuine. FURIOUS DRIVING. ' - On at , A. being in charge of ft certain veliicle, to wit, a four-wheeled cab, did, by his wanton and fur- ious drivinjf, {or '"racing") of and with the said vehicle unlawfully do (")' '' cause to be done ") bodily harm to B. INCEST. On at A,, and B., being and knowing themselves to be brother and sister, did unlawfully commit incest [or " did unlawfully have sexual iiitercourse ") with each other. STATEMENTS OF OFFENCES. • 107 INDECENT ACTS. - . On at A., a male person, in public (or " in private") -lid commit auact of gross indecency, with B., ano- ther male person. OR, On at A., a male person was a party to the commission of {or "did procure the commission of" or " did attempt to procure the commission ol") an act of gross indecency, in public, (or " in private" ) by B., also a male person, with C, another male person. INTIMIDATION. At on A., and B., unlaw- fully, and without lawful authority, did use violence to ior " injure the pro- perty of")C., by [Dcucriln' the personal i^iolence or the injtcrii to property, (as the case may In')], with a view to compel the said C. to employ D., E., and F., whom he the said C. had a lawful right to refuse to employ {or " to comjjel tiie said C. to discharge from and refuse to keep in his employ G., and 11., whom he the saidC. had a lawful right to retain in Ids employ.") OR At on A., B., and C, being workmen in the employ of D., unlawfully, wrongfully and without lawful au- thority did, by means of threats of using violence to (oc ■ ' of injuring the pro- perty of") the said I)., intimidate the said D., with a view to compel the said D., to raise and advance the wages of them the said A., B., and C. Ol{, • . , . , . •'^^ on A., and B., unlawfully, wrongfully, and without lawful authority, did persiste ntly follow C, from Ijlace to place, with a view to comijol the said C, to cease working for D., he the said C, having a lawful right to continue to work for the said D. I>'TIMIDATION, BY PICKETING. °" • and on divers other days before and since that date, A ., and B., unlawfullv, wrongfully, and with- out lawful authority, did beset and watch the building, workshop, and prem- ises of C, where D., was then working in the employ of the said C, with a view to compel the said D., to cease from working in the employ of the said C he the said D., having a lawful right to continue to work in the employ of the said C, (or "with a view to comj^el the said C, to discharge and to chscontinue employing the said D., he the said C, having a lawful right to continue the said D., in las employ.") l(iS PRACTICAL aUIDE TO MAUISTKATES. INTIMIDATION, BY ASSAULTS Oil THREATS, IN PUKSrANCE OF AN UNLAWFUL COMBINATION. At on , A., B., and C.havinK before then, unlawfully conspired, combined, confederated and agreed to- getlier to raise tlie rate of wa,;?es, then usually payable to worlvnion in a cer- tain trade, business and manufacture, to wit, the trade, business and manu- facture of brass fornding (or "calico printing,'' or ''cotton spinniu<x" or ""Bilk weaviu'j ' or "enjiine making" or " cigar makinu;" or " brickmaking," etc.), did, then and there, in pursuance of the said conspiracy, unlawfidly make an assault upon (or " use violence " or " threats of violence to") B., witli a view to liinder hiui friKii working {or " being employed") at such trade, business and manufacture. KIDNAPPING. On at , A., unlawfully, forcibly, and witiiout lawful authority, did kidnap B., and did unlawfully, forcibly, anil without lawful authority, seize, confine and imprison him, within the Dominion of Canada, with intent to cause the said B., to be secretly confined and iinf)risoned in Canada aforesaid, against his will, (or " with intent to cause the said B., to be unlawfully sent and transported out of Canada aforesaid.") MANSLAUGHTER. A. unlawfully did kill and slay B. at on OR, At on A. did commit man- slaughter. 311S<'inKF : ()I{ WJLFUL DAMAdE, DHSTJIUCTIOX. AXD I XJU J{y. WILFULLY DAMAGING A CANAL, Etc. At on A. unlawfully, wilfully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did damatrt' a certain canal (or " navigable river "), to wit {Describe it), by interfering with and breaking down the flood-gates {or "sluices") thereof, with intent, and so as thereby, to obstruct the navigation thereof. WILFULLY DAMAGING MANUFACTURING M.VCJHINES. At on A., unlawfully, wilfully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did damage (or "destroy ") certain agricultural {or "manufacturing") machines, to wit {Decr'ile them), the jjropjrty of B., with intent thereby to render them use- less. I STATKMENTS nK (iKh KNCKS. 109 WIM'CJLLY DAMA(;lN(i A POSr LETTER BA(;, Etc. At in A., unlawfully, wilfully, without lej;al justific-ation or excuse, and without color of right, did damage (or 'destroy") a certiiin post-letter b:i<.r (or "post-letter," or "ofeet letter ipox." Of "pillar box"), the property of tlie Postmaster-* leneral. WILFULLY I)AMA(;iN(l A PARCEL SENT BY POST. .\t on A., unlawfully, wilfully, without le<,'al justification or excuse, and without color of right, did damage ('•r "destroy") a certain parcel sent by parcel post, the property of the Postmaster-General. WILFULLY DAMAGING A PRIVATE FISHERY. At on A., unlawfully, wilfully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of riglit, did da.nage a certain private tiwluM'y (of "salmon river"), by putting into it a large ijuantiiy of liine, willi intent, thereby, to destroy the fish therein. WILFULLY DAMAGING A SHIP. WITH INTENT TO DESTROY OR RENDER IT USELESS. At on A., unlawfully, wilfully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did damage a certain ship, {Dcfcrihc it), with Intent to destroy it, (or "render it use- less.") WILFULLY DAMAGING THE SLUICE OF A PRIVATE WATER. -U on A., unlawfully, wilfully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did damage (or " destroy ") the flood-gate (or " sluice ") of a certain private water, to wit, the fish pond of 15., situated in aforesaid, with intent to take (or "destroy" or "to cause the loss of") the fish therein. AVILFULLY DESTROYING BIUDGES. f"^^ on , A., unlawfully, wilfully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did destroy (or "damage") a certain bridge (or "viaduct," or "aqueduct") situated in aforesaid, and over (or " under") which a certain high- way (or "railway," or "canal") to wit, (dcsxribe it), passes, and the said destruction {or "damage") was so done by the said A., with intent and so as to render the said bridge {or "viaduct," etc.) dangerous and impassable. WILFULLY DESTROYING CATTLE, Etc. , ,f * on , A., unlawfullv. wil- fully, without legal justification or excuse and without color of rigjit, did ItO 1'aA.OriOAL, OriDK to MAdlSTIlATES. destroy (or "damage") one cow, the property of B., by then and there killing {or "maiming," or "poisoning," or "wounding") the said cow. WILFULLY DKSrROYING GOODS IN PROCESS OF MANUFACTURE. At on ■ A.,unlawfiilly,wilfully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did destroy {or "damage"') certain goods. {Describe them) the property of B., then in process of manufacture, with intent thereby to render them useless. WILLFULLY DKSTROYING A HOUSE, ETC., AND ENDANGERING LIFE. At on , A., unlawfully, wil- fully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did, by means of an explosion, destroy (or "damage") a certain dwelling-house (or "ship," or "boat") to wit, {VeKcribe it), the property of H., there being certain persons to wit, C, and D., then in the said dwelling-houso, etc., and the said destruction or "damage") did then and there cause actual danger to life. WILFULLY DESTROYING A UIVIOR BANK, 1:TC., AND CAUSING DANliER OF INUNDATION. At on , A., unlawfully, wil fully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did destroy, {or "damage") the bank (or -'dyke") of a certain river, {Same it), whereby there was actual danger of inundation. WILFULLY DESTROYING OR DAMAGING, BY NIGHT, PROPERTY TO THE AMOUNT OF TWENTY DOLLARS. At on A., unlawfully, wilfully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color of right, did damage, {or " destroy,") by night, seven birch trees, {or " thirty-five patterns for the making of waterproof coats,") the property of B., thereby then and there in- juring the said trees {or "patterns") to the amount of twenty dollans. WILFULLY DESTROYING, BY DAY, PROPERTY TO THE AMOUNT OF TWENTY DOLLARS. At on , A., unlawfully, wil- fully, without legal justification or excuse, and without color cf right, did damage {or "destroy,") by day, one crate of crockery ware, the property of B., thereby injuring the said crockery ware to the amount of twenty dollars. WILFULLY DAMAGING OR DESTROYING TREES IN A PARK, Etc. At on A.,unlawfully,wilfully, without legal justification, and without color of right, did damage {or "des- ' STATEMKNTS (iK nl'KKNCES. 171 troy") two lir trees, the property of B., then growing in a certain park, (or "l)leii8uro >.'ronn(l," ")' "),'arden," or "land adjoining and belonginii to tlie (hvolling house") of the said B., thereby injuring the said trees to an ex- tont exceeding live dollars. WILFUIdA' DKSTROYING OR DAMAGING VEGKTABLE PRODUC- TIONS GROWING IN A GARDEN, Ivrc, Ai^TER A PREVIOUS CONVICTION. At on , A., nnlawfnlly, wil- fully, without legal justidfiation or excnse, and without color of right, did damage (or -'destroy ") forty caulillowers, tue property of B., then growing in a wrtaiii garden of the said i>., situated in aforesaid. That, heretofore, to wit, at on ( before the committing of the above mentioned offence,') the said A., was duly convicted before C, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace, for the district of of having at on {Set (lut Iht (ill'cnccj'orininy the lidnii^ of the Jlrst roif vkliou,) and was adju^'cd, for his said offence, to pay, {fir.), and in default of payment, etc., to be imprisoned, {etc.) And that, therefore, on the day and year lirfst aforesaid, the said A., did uidawfuUy, wilfully, without legal ju>- tilication or excuse and wiihout color of right, damage (or "destroy "i the said foity caulillowers al'ler having been previously convicted of a like of- fence of wilfully damaging (or "destroying") vegetable i)roductions in a garden, ttr. WILFUL INJURIES TO BUILDINGS, BY TENANTS. At on , A., being then pos- sessed of a certain dwelling-house situated in aforesaid, and thou held by him the said A., as tenant tht'reof, for an unexpired term of three years, did unlaul'idly, wilfully, without legal ju^tilication or excuse, ■without color of right, and to the prejudice of B., the owner thereof, pull down and demolish tiie said dwelling-house. ■ MISCHIEF ON RAILWAYS. ^^ on , A., unlawfully and in a manner likely to cause danger to valuable property, to wit, to certain cars of the Canadian Pacific Railway, on their railway at aforesaid, did displace a rail {or " sleeper, etc.), on and belonging to said railway, (or "did make a false signal on {or near] the said railway.") MISCHIEF ON RAILWAYS, WITH INTENT. ^^ on , A. did unlawfully break and injure a rail (or "sleeiier") on and belonging to the railway of the Grand Trunk Railway Company, at aforesaid, with intent 12 172 I'liACTICAl. (11 mi', '!•(( M \(ilSTII.\'l'KS. t'lereby to t'lmst! daiijjor to certain curs (jf tlio Haid liiiilw../ (jinpany on tlieir said railway. WJI.FUI.LY DKSTUUYING OR DAMAGING A RAILWAY. At on , A., nnlawfully, wilfully, without lejxal justifi(;ation or excuse, and without color of ri^ht, did dostroy (iif "daina)J!e") a certain railway, {Dmcrilif it), with intent and so as to render the same danj^orous and iniyassablo. WILFULLY RK.MOVlNti MARINp: SIGNALS. At on A., unlawfully, wilfully, without le^'al justification or excuse, and without color of rif;ht, did alter (or " remove," <>r " conceal ") a certain sitrnal 0"' '' buoy ") used upon the river ijt. Lawrence for the purpose of nuvigatioii. INTENTIONALLY EN1)AN< IKRING RAILWAY PASSEN(iK]!S. On at , A., u[)()n and across ft certain railway {Drscribe it), a certain piece of wood {or "stone,'' etc.) did unlawfully put (or- "throw") with intent thereby to injure or endanger the safety of jiersons travelling (or "being") upon the said railway. OR On at , A., a certain point (or other machimrij) then being upon and belonging to a certain railway (£>i*- ori6(^ i7), did unlawfully turn ((*r " move," or " divert", with intent thereby to injure or endanger the safety of persons travelling (or "being") thereon. OR, On at , A., unlawfully, did make (or "show," or "hide," or "remove") k certain signal (or "light") upon {or "near to") a certain railway {Drfcrilie ■il), with intent, thereby to injure or endanger the safety of persons travelling (or "being") upon tlie said railway. OR, On at , A., a certain piece of wood {or "stone," etc.), unlawfully did throw {or " cause to fall " or ''strike") at (or "against," or "into," or "upon") a certain engine (" or "tender," "c "carriage," or "truck "), then being used and in motion upon a certain rail- way (Describe it), with intent, thereby, to injure or endanger the safety of B., then and there being upon the said engine {or "tender," etc., or "an- other engine, etc., of the train of which the said llrst mentioned engine, ('(•, then formed part.") STATK.MK.VTS i p |' (H'l'KXCKS. 17;{ NKGUGKNTLY r,ND.\.\< iKRiNG TIIK SAFETY OF RAILWAY PASSl'.NGI'JUS. ^^" " «H , A., l)y wilfully omitting and iie^floctin.i; to do liis ihity, tn wit, 1)y wilfully orr'''in^' and lU'tilm'tin^r to (Sil mil III, piirlirnldf art iiiiiith'il), wliicli it was i.ien liis duty to do, unlawfully did endan<:er (or " ninse to he endanjiered ") thesafetyof i^er- sons tiien conveyt'd (../■ "tminn") i'> aiid upon a certain railway there called MURDEli. A. nnirdered I!, ut on Oil, •^' on A. did commit murder. ATTEMl'T TO .MUUDKl;, iJY OROVVNING, '^^ «» , A., unlanfullv did atte;iii)t t.> drown (or •'snllWate," or "stranijle") 1!., with intent, thereby, to nuink.r the said 1',., (or '■ witli intent, thereby, to commit nuirder"). ATTEMI'T To MURDER, I'.Y EXPLOSION. /^' , . „ '^" .A., unlawfully, did, by the ex|)lo8sion of a certain exi)lusive substance, (1 ) to wit, (Difcrihc the explo- kIi-c], d(^slroy (or "damaiu'e " a certain building; situate ami lunng in conuui, murcM.' "' ^'°'''-'"^' ^^"'' '""^"*' '^'^'''^- ' *" ATTEMPJ To MURDER, IJY POISONING ult SHOOTING. ^!' \. , . ?" • '•^•' unlawfully did with a certain gun (.)/■ pistol, or revolver), shoot at {or unlawfully did ad- minister, or cause to be administered certain jwison, or a certain destructive , "■'"*-'• .'" ^^■''' to) me, (or B.), with intent, tberebv, to 1 commit murder. ' ■- ATTEMPT TO MURDER BY WOUNDING, Etc. , , ., . ""^ . A., unlawfully did wound [or cause grievous bodily harm") to B. with intent, thereby to murder the said B. (or " with intent, thereby, to commit murder "). ATTEMPT TO MURDER BY ANY MEANS. f , . , . °" . A., by cutting the rope of a certain hoist lor "breaking the chain of a certain elevator '' i in a certain buiklini: situate and being in ♦ . • ... street m aloresaid, (or, Olherwise describe the actual deed) did imlawlully attempt to murd«r B. (or " to commit murder "). (1) See arlicle 3 (i), of the Code, for definition of explosive substance." 174 PRACTICAL Gl'IDi: TO MAOISTRATES. CONSPIRACY TO MUKDEK. At 'on , A., B. and C. did unlawfully conspire and a;:;ree together to murder D., (or " to cause I),, to be murdered.") COUNSELLING MURDER. At on , A., did unlawfully counsel (or "attempt to procure") B., to murder C. THREATENING, BY LETTER, TO KILL OR MURDER. At on ". , A., unlawfully did send (or '' deliver "), to {or " cause to be received by ") B., a certain letter (or '•writing") tlireatoning to kill (or "murder") the said B., he the said A., then knowing the contents of the said letter (or " writing"). OR, At on , A., unlawfully did utter a certain writing, (or "letter"), threatening to kill (or "murder") B., he the said A., then knowing the contents thereof. NEGLECT OF DOMESTIC DUTIES, ETC. (1) OMISSION OF FATHER TO PROVIDE NECESSARIES FOR CHILD UNDER SIXTEEN. At on , and on divers other days before and since that date. A., being the father of !>., a child under sixteen years of age, then and there a nieud)er of the said A.'s house- hold, and the said A., being as such fathei', under a legal duty and boun.l by law to provide suMicient food, clothing lodging and all other necessaries for the said B., did, in disregard of his duty \u that behalf, unlawfully, re- fuse, neglect, and omit, without lawful excuse; to provide necessaries for the said B., his said child, by means whereof the said B's life has been and is endangered ; (or "the said B's health is now and is likely to be permanently injured.") OMISSION OF HUSBAND TO PROVIDE NECESSARIES FOR WIFIv. {Commenrc as abov: ) A., the husband of B., lieing, then and there, under a legal duty and bound by law to jirovide sullicient food, clothing and lodging und all other necesisaries for B-, his said wife, did, in disregard of his duty in that behalf, unlawhiily, refuse, neglect and omit, without lawful excuse, to provide necessaries for her the said B., by means whereof the said B's lifu has been and is endangered, (or, " the said B.'s heallh is now and is likely to bo permanently injured.") (1) For " Abandoning Child," see p. 141!, a?i/f'. STATEMENTS OF OB'FENCES. 175 OMISSION OF MASTER TO PROVIDE ]SECESSARII':S FOR SERVANT OR APPRENTICE. {Commence as above) A., being the master of B., a Bervant, (or " an apprentice"), under sixteen years of age, and being under contract and legalh- bound to provide necessary food, clothing and lodging for the said B., as his servant, {or "apprentice,") did in disregard of such contra(!t and the legal duty imposed upon him by law, in that behalf, un- lawfully refuse, neglect and ora^t, without lawful excuse, to provide neces- sary fooil, clothing and lodging for tho said B., by means whereof the said B's life has been and is endangered; (or "the said B's health has been and is likely to be permanently injured.") CAUSING BODILY HARM TO SERVANT OR APPRENTICE. On at A., being the master ofB., a servant {or "an apprentice"), ivdlawful'y did do and cause to be done bodily barm to the sai<l B., whereby the life of the said B. was and is endangered; (or "the liealth of the said B. has been and is likely to be per- manently injured.") NEGLECT TO OBTAIN ASSISTANCE IX CIIILD-BIRTII. ^^ oil , A., being with child and about to bo delivereil thereof, unlawfully, with intent that the child should not live, did, neglect to provide reasonable assistance in herdeliverv in consequence of which neglect her said child was and is permanently injured, (or " died during or shortly after birth.") OR, {Commence an above) witli intent to conceal the fact of her having had a child, did neglect to piovide reasonable assistance in her delivery, in consequence of which neglect, her said child was and is perma- nently injured, {or " died during or shortly after hirth.") ' ' OBSCENE ACTS. ' °" ** , 1 in a certain open and j.ublic store of him tlie said A., there situate, unlawfully, knowingly, and without lawful justification or excuse, did hell (or " ex|K)se for public sale," or " expose for public view,") a certain, lewd, wicked, indecent, and obscene picture (or " photograph" or •' model") representing a naked man and a naked woman in a lewd, indecent, and obscene (Misture together, (or, 09 the case may be), and having a tendency to corrupt morals. OFFEN.SIVE WEAPONS. ^" at A., unlawfullv did carry (^or " have in Ids i ossession," vr " custody") a certain offensive weapon, 116- PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. to wit, a sword {or "an air-gun," or " a dasrgrer," or " a pistol," w "metal knuckles"), for a purpose dangerous to tlie public peace. SMUGGLER? CARRYING OFFENSIVE WEAPONS. On at • , A., did unhuvfully have possession of certain goods, to wit, {describe Hum) liable to seizure {or " forfeiture") under {mention the Act or lair) relating to inland revenue, (or " the customs," or " trade," or " navi^ration") knowing them to 1)b so liable, and that he did then and there and at the same time unlawfully carry a cer- tain offensive weapon to wit. {describe it.) OFFICIATING CLERGYMAN,— OP.STRITTION OF. A., on at unlawfully did, by force, (tlirratu or force) obstruct and prevent B., a clergyman from celebrating divine service in the parish church in the parish of C, (or " in the perfor- mance of his duty in the lawful burial of the dead in the church yard of the parish church of the parish of C") STRIKING OR ARRESTING OFFICIATING CLEilGYMAN. A., on at unlawfully did arrest upon a certain civil process, {or " did .strike," or did offer violence to") B., a clergyman whilst he, as such clergyman, was going to perform divine service, he, the said A., then well knowing that the said B., was a clergyman going to perform divine service PERJURY. A. committed perjury, with intent to procure the conviction of B. for an offence punishable with imprisonment for more than seven years, namoly, robbery, by swearing on the trial of B. for the robbery of C, at the Court fit' (Quarter Sessions for the < 'onnty of on the day of 18 ; JirM, that he, A. saw B. at on the day of ; secovdly, that B. asked A. to lend B. money on a watch belonging to C. ; tliinlly, etc. OR, \. committed perjury, en the trial of B. at the Court of Quarter Sessions held at on for an assault alleged to lia^o been committed by the said 15. on C. at Toronto on the day nf , by swearing to the efl'oct that the said 13. could not have Ijecii at Toronto at the time of the alleged assault, inasmuch as the said A. Iiad seen him at that time in L'ort .\rthur. SUBORNATION OF PER.IURY, Same an last form to the end, and thi . proceed : — And that before the committing of the said jierjury by the said A. to wit, STATEMENTS nK OFt'ENCES. ITT on the ilay of . at , C unlawfully, (lid counsel and procure the said A., to do and commit the said iJerjury. PERSONATION, ^j on , A. unlawfull}' did personate B., (or " tlie administrator," or " widow," or " next of kin of the late C," or "the wife of D.") witli intent thereby fraudulently to obtain {Dcfmbe the monnj or property intended to he obtained.) PERSONATION AT AN EXAMINATION. ^Yt on , A., unlawfnlly falsely and with intent to ^rain an advantage for himself, {or " one H.") did personate C„ a candidate at a comjietitive (or " qualifyins;") examination held under authority of law, {or " in connection witli the McGill College University, "or " tlie I.aval University " of Montreal."] PERSONATING AN OWNER OF STOCK. At on , A., unlawfully, false- ly and deceitfully did parsouate B., the owner of a certain share and in- terest in certain stock {amndty or ollter public fund) to wit, {<jire the amount and discrijilinii of the fiaid 8lock, etc.), then transferable at the Bank, and did, by means of such personation, transfer (or "en- deavor to transfer,") llie said share and interest of the said B., in the said, stock, etc., as if he the said A., were tiie lawful owner thereof. ACKNOWLEDGING AN INSTRUMENT IN A F.\LSE NAME. At on , A., did, before the Court of Queen's Bench for the Province of Quebec, sitting? in and for the District of Montreiil, (or "tlio Honorable Mr. Justice — " etc.), unlawfully, and without lawful authority or excuse, acknowledge in the name of B,, a certain recognizance of hail, (or " cagnovit actionem" etc.), to wit, {Describe the instti-ument and the cause, nction , or proa ediug to which itrelates.) PIRACY. A., B., and ('., on with force of arms, upon the high seas, to wit, in and on board a certain ship called the Alabama, in a certain place n])on the high seas about ten leagues from Baltimore in the Uriited States of America, then being, did in a!idn|)on certain mariners whose names are unknown, then and there being, unlawfully, piratically and violently make an asisault and them, the said mariners, put in bodily fear and danger of their lives. POLYGAMY. ^* on , and on divers other days before and since that date, A., a male person, and B., C , and D., three ITS PRACTICAL (HIDE TO MAQISTRATES. females, unlawfully, did practice, (or " agree to practice ") polysamy toge- ther. OR At on , A., a male person, and B., C, and D., three females, did unlawfully, by mutual consent, enter into a form of polygamy together. OR At on , and on divers other days before that date, A., unlawfully did practice (or " agree to practice") polygamy with certain women, to wit, B., C, and D. OR At on , A.,amaleiierson,and B., C, and D., three females, did unlawfully enter into a conjugal union {or •' spiritual or plural marriage," etc ), together, by means of a contract [or" the rites" or "rules," etc., "of a certain denomination," or "sect" or "society" called Mormons, [or " called" etc.) ] PUBLIC STORES— UNLAWFULLY APPLYING MARKS TO THEM. At on . A., unlawfully and without lawful authority, did apply, in and on certain stores, to wit, fifty yards of canvas, and twenty yards of fearnauglit, a certain mark, to wit, a blue line in a serpentine form. OR, At on , A., unlawfully and without lawful authority, did apply in and on certain stores, to wit, fifty yards of bunting, a certain mark, to wit, a double tape in the warp of the said bunting. UNLAWFUL POSSESSION, Etc., OF PUBLIC STORES. At on , A., unlawfully, and without lawful authority, did receive (or " possess," or "keep," or "sell," or "deliver") certain public stores, to wit, twenty five pounds of candles, bear- ing a certain mark, to wit, blue threads in each wick, to denote Her Majesty's property therein. RAPE. On at , A., in and upon B., a woman, not his wife, did unlawfully make an assault, and did unlawfully ravish and have carnal knowledge of her the said B., without her consent. OR, On at , A., did unlawfully have carnal knowledge of B., a woman, not his wife, with consent by him STATEMENTS OK OFFENCES. IT!' obtained from the said B., unlawfully, and by throats, (or "iinlavi fully and by personating the husband of the said B.," or "by false and fraudulent re- presentations as to the nature and quality of the act.") ATTEMPT TO COMMIT RAPE. On at , A., in and upon B., a woman, not his wife, did unlawfully make an assault, with intent to un- lawfully ravish and have carnal knowledge of her without her consent. CARNALLY KNOWING A GIRL UNDER FOURTEEN. On at , A., did unlawfully have carnal knowledge of B., a girl under the age of fourteen years, to wit, of the age of thirteen years and six months. ATTEMl-T TO CARNALLY KNOW A GIRL UNDER FOURTEEN. On at , A., did unlawfully attempt to have carnal knowledge of B., a girl under the age of fourteen years, to wit, of the age of thirteen years and six months. RECEIVING PROPERTY STOLEN, OR OBTAINED BY ANY INDICTABLE OFFENCE. At on , A., did unlawfully receive and have one piano, belonging to B., and theretofore unlawfully stolen [or " obtained by an indictable offence, (o wit, by false pretences," or (Dencribe the njlenrc b;i iiliich thr piano vas obtained], he the said A., then well knowing the said piano to have been so unlawfully stolen, (or "obtained by the said indictable ofl'ence.") OR, At on , A., unlawfully stole one piano belonging to B. And, that, afterwards, at on C^, unlawfully did receive and have, the said piano so stolen as aforesaid, he, the said C, then well knowing the same to have been stolen. RIOT. On at A., B., and C., with divers other per- sons unknown, unlawfully, riotously and in a manner causing reasonable fear of a tumultuous disturbance of the peace, did assemble together, and, being so a.ssenibled together, did make a great noise, and thereby began and conti- nued for sometime to disturb the peace tumuliuously. RIOTOUS DESTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS. A., on at , with two other persons at least, <lid unlawfully, riotously and tumultuously assemble together to the distur- 180 PRACTICAI, (iriDK J'li AfAOISTRATES. r . I- . ' ■ bance of the public peace, and with force did unlawfully demolish and pul) down {or " begin to demolish &c"), a certain building of B. . RIOTOUS DAMACiE TO BUILDINGS. ' A., on at , with two other j^ersons at least, did un- lawfully, riotously and tumultnously assemble together, to the disturbance of the public peace, and with force did unlawfully injure and damage certain machinery of B. NEGLECT TO SUPPRESS RIOT. On at the city of . within tlie juris- diction of A., then the mayor of and present in the city of , there was a riot, and the said A., then havini: notice thereof, unlawfully arid without any reasonable cause, did omit to do his duty as such mayor in suppressing the said riot. OMITTING TO AID PEA( E OFFICER TO SUPPRESS RIO'". On at , there was a riot, and that A., B. and C, then and tiiere present, being called upon and requested by D., a peace officer in the exercise of his duty in that behalf, to render him their assistance in suppressing the said riot, did unlawfully and without any reasonable cause refuse and omit to do so. ROBBERY. f - ' At on , A., unlawfully, and by means of violence {or " threats of violence") used by him to and against the person [or "property ") of B., to prevent [or "overcome ") resistance, did steal frem the person {or "in the presence") of the said B., and against his will, moneys of him the said B., amounting to fifty dollars. ROBBERY BY SEVERAL PERSONS TO<iETHER. At on , A., B. and ('., being then and there together, did, with and by means of violence {or " threats of violence ") used by them to and against tiie person {or " property ") of B., to jirevent (or "overaome") resistance, unlawfidly and violently steal from the person (or "in ihe (iresence"') uf the said B., and against the said B's will, moneys of the said B., amounting to one hundred dollars. ROBBERY Bi' A PERSON ARMED WITH AN OFFENSIVE WEAPON. At on , A., being armed with a certain offensive weapon, to wit, a brass knuckle-duster {or "lead- loaded cane," or "sand-bag," or "pistol," or "knife"), did, with and by means of violence (or " threats of violence"), used by him to and against the person (or " property ") of B., to prevent {or " overcome ") resistance, STATEMENTS OF OKt'E.VCKS. 181 unlawfully and violently steal from the person (or "in the presence") of the said 1!., and ajrainst his will, one diamond rinii: belon<;iug to the said B. ROBBERY, WITH WOUNDING, Ere. At on , A., with and by means of violence {or "threats of %iolence") used by him to and aj^ainst the per- son [or "property") of B,, to prevent (or "overcome") resistance, did nnlawfully and violently steal from the j)er.«on {or "in the presence") of the said B., and against his will, one gold watch belonging to the said B. ; and that at the time {or "immediately before," or "immediateh after") he 80 robbed the said B., \wi the said A. did unlawfully wound (or " beat," "r " strike," or " use personal violence to ") the .said B- AS.SAULT, WITH INTENT To KOB. .At on , A., in and upon !>. unlawfully did make an aesaidt, with intent the moneys, and goods of the said B., unlawfully and v'olenUy to steal from the i)erson and against the will of the said B. ASSAULT BY AX ARMED PERSON. -At on , A., then being armed with a certain ofiensive weapon, to wit, a heavy bludgeon, did, in and upon B., unlawfully make an assault, with intent the moneys of the said B., un- lawfully and violently to steal from tlie. i)erson and against the will of the .saitl B. , • , ' STOBPlN(i THE .AIAIL. ^* . on , A., unlawfully did stop a certain mail, to wit, the mail for conveying letters between ""'^ . I with intent to rob (or "search") the same. • ROBBERY, BY FORCIBLY COMPELLING EXECUTION OF A DOCUMENT. ., o"^ . A., bv means of un- lawful violence to {or " restraint of") the pe-son of B., did unlawfullv compel the said B. to execute {or "sign," or "destroy") a certain deed; to wit, [Ui!>cTthe H), with intent to defraud (or " injure "). ( )H, , ■ *"* , A., by means of a threat to employ unlawful violence to (or "restraint of") tlie i)erson of B., |hd unlawfully compel the said B. to sign {or "accept," or "endorse," or itestroy," or "alter") a certain promissory/note {etc.) to wit, (Dci^cribe it), with nitent to defraud (or "injure"). 18li I'HACTICAL (HIDE Tl» MAOISTRATES. SEDUCTION OF GIRL r.ETWEEN FOURTEEN /VND SIXTEEN. Ou at , A. juilawfully did seduce (or "have illicit connection with") B., a girl of previously chaste char- acter, then being of {or "above") the age of fourteen years and under the age of sixteen years. SEDUCTION UXDKU PROMISE OV' .MARRIAGE. On at , A., then above the ago of twenty-one years, did, unlawfully, and under promise of mar- riage, seduce and have illicit connection with B., an unmarried female, of previously chaste character, and under twenty-one years of age. SEDUCTION BY GUARDIAN OF WARD. On ' at , A., then being the guardian of B., unlawfully did seduce {or ''have illicit connection with") the said B., his ward. SEDUCTION OF FACTORY E]MPLOYEE. On at A., unlawfully did seduce {or "have illicit connection with") B., a woman of previously chaste char- acter, and under the age of twenty-one years, to wit, of the age of years, and then also being in the said A's employ, in the said A's factory {or •' mill," or " workshop"). SETTING SPRING-GUNS, Etc. On at , A., unlawfully did set and place {or " cause to be set and placed ") in a certain place {Describe nhere set) a certain spring-gun {or "man-trap") calculated to destroy human life {or " inflict grievous bodily harm") with intent that the same {or " whereby the same") might destroy {or "inflict grievous bodily barm upon") any trespasser or other person coming in contact therewith. SOLEMNIZING MARRIAGE WITHOUT .AUTHORITY. On at A., without lawful authority, did unlawfully solemnize {or "pretend to solemnize") a marriage between B. and G. OR, On at , A., then knowing that B. was not lawfully authorized to solemnize a marriage between C and D., did unlawfully procure the said B. to unlawfully solemnize a mar- riage between the said C. and D. SOLEMNIZING A MARRIAGE CONTRARY TO LAW. At on , A., a clergyman of , having lawful authority to solennize marriages, did solemnize STATEMKXTS OK ttFFENCES. 183 n uiarriape between B. and C, unlawfully, and in violation of tlie laws of the province of , in which the said marriage was so solemn- ized, to wit, by solemnizing the same without any previous publication of banna, and without any licence in that behalf (or; ^V< out the particular violn' tion complained of). STEALING CATTLE. At on , A., unlawfully did steal one horse the property of B. . ST i; A LING CHILDREN UNDER FOURTEEN. On at , A., unlawfully did take (or " entice ") away {or " detain ") one B., a child under the a<?e of four- teen years, to wit, aged twelve years, with intent, thereby, to deprive C, the father {or " mother," or "guardian" etc.), of the said B., of the possession of the said B. [or with intent thereby, then and there, to steal certain articles, to wit, (Mention lliem), then being on or about the person of the said B.] OR, On ^^ > -^•. unlawfully did receive (or " harbor") one B., a child under the age of fourteen years, to wit, aged years, knowing the said 1>. to have been tliere- toforo taken (or "enticed") away, with intent to deprive ('., the father (o?- " mother," or " guardian " etc.) of the said B., of the possession of the said B. STEALING FROM A DOCK. At on , A unlawfullydidsteal from a certain dock, (or " wharf") adjacent to the navigable river St. Law- rence, one sack of flour belonging to B., and then being upon the said dock. STEALING FROM THE PERSON. At on , A., unlawfully did steal one gold watch, and one silver watch-chain from the person of B. STEALING IN A DWELLING-HOUSE. -^t on , A., unlawfullv did steel twelve silver spoons, of the value of twenty-five dollars, belonging to B. in the dwelling-house of the said B., situated in aforesaid OR, ^\ oil , A., unlawfullv did steal twelve silver forks belonging to B., in the dwelling-house of the said B. situated in aforesaid, there then being in the said dwelhng-house,one<'.,who was put in bodily fear by the menaces and threats of the said A. ISl I'I1A( TICAI, (it IDK TO M.\(ilSTIIATKS. STEALING GOODS IN IMANUFACTORUvS. At on * , A., r.nhiwfiiliy did steal forty yards of calico worth five doilars. liclonginj,' to B., in a certp.in weaving shod of the said P.., situated in aforesaid, whilst tiip same woro tiiero oxposed upon the looms of tlio sai<l 13., diirinjj; a certain stage, process or progress of tho niannfactnro thereof. FRAUDULENTLY lUSl'OSING OF GOODS ENTRUSTED FOR MANUFACTURE. At i>n , A., did frnndnlontly dispose of one hiuidied yards of tweed cloth, tho iiropcrty of l'>., which the said A. had been tlieretofore entrusted with to manufacture. STF.ALING IN OK FROM RAILWAY STATIONS, Ere. At on . A., unlawfully did steal one umbrella and one rug belonging to B., in (w "from,") a certain railway station, to wit, a station of the Grand Trunk Railway Company {or " the Canadian I'acltic Railway Company ,"j and situated at aforesaid. STEALING IN A SHIP ON A NAVIGABLE RIVER. At on ' , A., unlawfully did steal in a certain ship called the " Nepigon " twelve bars of iron of the goods and merchandise of B., then being in tho said ship, upon the navigable river St. Lawrence, (or " in a certain port of discharge, to wit, the port of Montreal.") STEALING OYSTERS.. At on , A., unlawfully di<t steal from a certain oyster-bed, called , tho property of P.. one hundred oysters. STEALING A POST-LETTER BAG, POST-LETTER, Etc. At on , A., unlawfully did steal one jiost-letter bag, {nr "post-letter" or "parcel in transit through the post,"') the property of the Post-Master General. STEALING A P0ST-L1:TTER FROM A POST-LETTER BAG, Etc. At on , A., unlawfully did steal one post-letter, ihe property of the Post-Master General, from a post- letter bag, (or " from a post-ofllce " or " from an officer employed in the jiost- office of Canada.") STATEMKNTS dl' (iKTKVCKS. STEALING A POST-Ll'-TTHl! AViril MONKY IN IT. 185 fi ^j, on - ''■' "nlawfnlly did steal one" post-letter, the property of the Po8t-^[a8ter General which post- h.tter fontaine.1 a certain chattel, to wit. (I>>'^rribi- U), [or "certain money to wit, [Amount), " or " a certain valuable security, to wit," {Descnlw it).'] STEALING MONF.Y, Etc., OUT Ol' A POST-LETTER, Etc. . 'on t -^-i 'inlawf"lly did steal a certain chattel, to wit, (D.Kvlhe it), [or "certain money, to wit, ( imoiml) " nr ■' a certain valuable security, to wit," (Disrribc <l], from ai.d out of a post-letter (or " parcel,") the property of the Post-Master (General. STEALlN(i TREES WOWTll MORE THAN $2."). ^^ oil , A., unlawfully did steal one ash tree worth twenty-six dollars, the property of B., tiieu growing in a certain field of the said 15., situated in aforesaid. STEALING A TREE (WORTH *5), IN A PARK, Etc. \^ ' on • . A., unlawfully did steal one apple tree, of the value of six dollars, the property of 15., growing in a certain orchard of ttie said 15., situated at aforesaid. STEALING TREES AFTER TWO PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS. At on A., unlawfully, did steal one shrub worth fifty cents, the property of 13., then growing in a certain plot of land situate in aforesaid ; that at on (before the committing of the above mentioned oflfence), the said A., was duly convicted, before ('., one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace for tne district of , of having at on [Set out tht olflnce forminy the basis of thejirsl convi- ction) and was adjudged, for such offence, to pay, etc., and in default of pay- ment, etc., to lie imprisoned, e<c. ; that at on (before the committing of the firstly above mentioned ofl'ence, but after the next hereinbefore mentioned conviction, the said A., was again duly convicted, before D., one of Her Majesty's jus- tices of the peace for the district of of having at on {Set out the necond conviction) ; And, therefore, on the day and year firsi aforesaid, the said i\.., did unlawfully steal the said slirub worth fifty cer'd, after having been twice convicted of tlie ofl'ence of stealing a shrub, ( r " tree," f^c), worth at least twentv-five cents. 1*^0 I'ltAcriCAl, (Jl IliK Til MAfilSTltATES. STEALING WKE( K. At on , A., unlawfully di<l steal one coil of roiie, and ono com puss, lielnj; jwrtionH of the tackle of a cer- tain ship, called the "Havk," the proparty of B., and other perKonB, which sliip was then and there lying stranded and wrecked. OR, At on , A., unlawfully did steal one bale of raw silk helonjjinj: to B., and forming part of the cargo of a certain ship called the " J 'omcnrnian," then and there lying stranded and wrecked. 8 UK TDK. AIDING AND ABETTING SUICIDE. At on , and on divers other days before that date, A., unlawfully did counsel and procure B., to commit euicide, in conseciuence whereof the said B., then and there, did commit suicide- ATTEMra 10 COMMIT SUICIDE. A., at on unlawfully did attempt to commit suicide, by then and there endeavouring to kill himself. TIIEET BY A BANK OFFICIAL. .\t, on A., being then and there a cashier {or " assistant cashier," or " manager" or ' '•k," etc.,) of the Bank, {or "Savin^.s Bank ), did imlaw fully steal certain money, to wit, five thousand dollars, [or "bonds," or "obliga- tions," etc., [Deacribc tlitm],) belonging to, {or "lodged," or " deposited") in the said Bank, [or " Savings Bank."]. THEFT BY A CLERK OR SERVANT. At on A., being a clerk, {or " employed for the purpose and in the capacity of a clerk") to B., his master, (or " employer"), did unlawfully steal certain money, to w it, one hundred dol- lars, certain goods, to wit, one gold watch, and a certain valuable security, to wit, one promissory note for twenty dollars, belonging to (or " in the po8se.s- sion of") the saiJ B., his master, {or " employer.") THEFT BY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE. At on A „ being employed in the service of Her Majesty, {or " the (Tovernment of Canada," or " the Gov- ernment of the Province of Ontario," or " Quebec," or " the Municipality of I STATEMENTS (IK (iKKE.NCK.S. 18T' ") and boin^, by virtue of his said employment, in poH- sosHion of certiiin moneys to the amount of ten thousand dollars, [or "cer- tain valuable securities, [Describe them]), did unlawfuily steal the said moneys, elc.'') THEl'T IJY HOLDER OF A POWER OF ATTORNEY. At on , A., having been then tofore entrusted, by B., with a power of attorney to sell certain land am' buiitliugs, to wit, (Dewrihc the properti/,) and haviuf,' theretofore sold the spid land and l)uildin>;8, did, fraudulently convert tiie proceeds of the said sale, to wit, till! sum of two thousand dollars, to a purpose other than that for which lie was entrusted with the said power of attorney, by applying and converting.' tlie said money to his own use. THEFT BY MISAPPROPRIATING MONEY HELD UNDER DIRECTION, At on A., having theretofore re- ceived from B., the sum of one hundred dollars, with a direction from him tiie said B., to ilio said A., tluit tlie said money should be paid to (',, did, in violation of good faith and contrary to the terms of the sa'd direi^tion, fraudulently and unlawfully convert to his own use and thereby steal the said sum of money. THEFT BY A PARTNER. At on , A stole one car load of coals of the value of the property of a co-partnership composed of the said A. and one B. th:;ft by a tenant. -^^ "" A., being then and there a tenant, (oc "lodger") of or in a certain house (or "lodging,") to wit, (Dcitcribe the pmnms), did unlawfully steal a certain chattel, (or "fixture")', to wit, (Iks'rihe it), belonging to B„ and let to be used by him the said A. in or «ith tiie said house, (or "lodging.") - , * THEFT OF A DOCUMENT OF TITLE. ^^ 0" , A., unlawfully did steal a certain document of title to goods, (or " to lands"), to wit. one bill of lading, (or "deed." or "map," or "paper." c<c.,) containing evidence of the title, (or " a part of tlie title") of B., to certain goods, (or " real proi)erty,") to wit, (d>'scribe the property), belonging to the said B. (or " in which the said B. has an interest.") ■ ■ 13 188 PRACTICAL (iUIDE Tli MAorSTKATKS. : ] , / THEFT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS, Etc. At . on , A., unlawfully diil steal, a certain record, (or "writ," or "petition," ilc, forminji i)art of a cer- tain record") of and helon^inir to the Superior Court of Lower Canada, for the District of Montreal, in a certain cause {iJencribc the cauw, matter or pro- ceeding,) then (or "theretofore") depending; in the said Court. THEFT OF THINGS UNDER SKIZURE. At on . , A., w'ithout lawful authority, did unlawfully take or car'-y away, one horse of the value of belonging to the said A., (or "one B,") and tlien and there be- ing under lawful seizure. THEFT OF A WILL. At on A., did unlawfully steal a certain testamentary instrument, to wit, the last will and testament [or " a codicil to the last will and testament") of B. THRI-'.ATENING LETTER. (1) At on , A,, did unlawfully send to (or "cause to be received by") B., a certain letter (or "writing") de- manding of him the said B., with menaces, a certain sum of money, to wit, , the said demand teing witb.out reasonable or probable cause, and he the said A. then well knowing the contents of the said letter (oc "writing"), which is as follows. (Set il out.) ., DEMANDING, WITH THREATS, WITH INTENT To STEAL. At on , A., with menaces, tinlawfuUy did ilemand of me, this deponent (or " B."), one liundred dol- lars, with intent to steal the same from me, ("r " the said B.") TRADE MARK,— FORGERY OF. At on , A., unlawfully did forge (or " cause to be forged"), a certain trade-mark, to wit, (Describe it). FALSELY ArPLYIN(i A TRADE-MARK. At- on , A did unlawfully, falsely apply (or " cause to be applied ") to certain goods, to vf\t,(I)eitcrihe them) a certain trade-mark to wit, (Describe il), ("r "a mark so nearly resembling a certain trade-mark to wit" (Describe it), "as to \>& calculated to deceive.") (1 ) For "Extortion by Threats," see p. 161, ante. STATEMENTS OK OKKKNCES. 189 TREASON. On at . within Her Majesty's Jioininions, A, with clivers other false traitors unknown, and armoil, ariayed, ami assembled together in warlike niaiinor, did nniawfiilly and traitorously levy and make war against our Sovereign Lady the (^ueen, with intent tliereby to depose Her Majesty from the st>le, honor and royal name of the Iiiii)erial Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and of Her other IXmiinions. ASSAULTS ON TFIE QUHEN. ( )n at A., a certain pistol, which he the said A., in his right hand then had and held, unlawfully, and wilfully did point, aim, and present at (*'ator near lo") the person of our l.iiily the Queen, with intent, thereby, to alarm our said liady the Queen. INCITING TO MUTINY. A., on at , unlawfully, and for a traitorous and mutinous jmrpose, did endeavor to seduce one B., he the said B. then being a person sers'ing in Her Majesty's forces on land, from his duty and allegiance to Her ^lajesty. UNLAWFUL OATH,— ADMINISTERING OR TAKING. A., on at did unlawfully take, (nr '' administer and cause to be administered to B."), a certain oath and engagement purporting to bind the said A., [or " I!.") not to inform or give evidence against any associate, confederate or other i)er8on of or belonging tn a certain unlawful association or confederacy, (Add, — in cam of u cliargefcr ixkiiKj thr <Hi(h,~" he the said A. not being then comi)elled to take the said oiilh and engiigenient," <ir,—ih ruse of a chanjc for wlimimttrimj,—'- and whicli snid oiUh and engagement was tlien and there taken by the said B.") WOUNDINii, AVITH INTENT TO MAIM, Etc. ^'" at A., with intent to maim (or "disligure," or "disable" or "do grievous bodily harm to") B,, uid.iwfully did wound (or " cause grievous bodily harm to") the said B. (or " unlawfully <iid, with a certain loaded gun, or putol or revolver, shoot or attempt to discharge a loaded arm at the said B,"] OR, . ° at , A., with intent to re- sist the lawful apprehension (or " detainer") of him the said A. (or " of B.") unlawfully ,lid wound (or "cause grievous bodily harm to") C. [or "unlaw- 100 PKACTICAr, litlPK TO MAGISTRATES. fully did witli a certain loaded gun or pistol, or revolver, shoot {or attempt to discharge a loaded arm at) C] WOUNDING, WITHOUT INTENT. On at , A., unlawfully did wound [or " inllict grievous bodily harm upon ") B. WOUNDING A PUBLIC OFFICER. At on , A unlawfully did maim (or " wound") B., a public oliicer engaged in the execution of his duty, (or " a i)erson acting in aid of C, a public olficer engaged in the execution of his duty.") CJlAl'Tlvli IX. (Part XL V of the Code) I'llOC'EKIHliE (i\ Al'I'EAHANCE i>l' A(('rsEI>. I'ltEI.I.MINAHV EM^iriliV. 577. — M lii'ii I'rt'li ill ilia i\v I'^iiqiiiry i** !»*' Il«>l<l. — Whoii any ])its(iii aoi'usi'd ol' an iiHJii'taldo oIloiK'f is iu't'oiv a \ns\\vc, \\\\r\\\vv voluntarili/, ov upon summons. i>r al'tcr iiciuu- apprc- Iwnded, with or iritkout warrant, up wivk in custodij tWr ihr same nr aii\' DthiT Dli'ciicc, till' justice slial' |ii'i>cci'il tn iiwpiirc into the matliTs eliargi'd a!j,'aiiist siicli piTson. in tlu' iiiaiiiu'r licrcinat'tei- (IcIilH'd. l*i*o|»«'i*<.v I'oiiikI ii|»oii a l*i*i!S4»ii«>r uli«'ii .i|»|ii'«'- llciKlt'll. — if, ujion iiis ap|)i'i'lu'iisii)ii, tlio aci'U.st'il has ln'cii di'- iirivL'd liy the ciiiistaliio of his money and other \ !ilnal>les, it will be ]>ropi'r, undov certain ciniiinstaiu'cs, to make an ajijilicatioii to the magisti'ale tof theii' festoration. Tliere can lie im dnuiil tlial, when a peison is a|i|)i'ehendeil upon a criminal charii'e, it is rii;hl and proper that all weapons as well as evervthinu" conneeteil with or liaviny a tendency |o (lirow light >p)on the siilijeet matter of the ehari>;e shn\ild be searched for and taken from liini, and lie kept in safety until I he chari;'!' is in sum (■ way PKELIMI.VARV ENQUIRY. 191 <li-.|)ii>((l 111', or somo order niade in reference thereto. Hut to deprive ;i |iri-nncr of liis])ro]KM;ty forany other pnri>ose is Ijoth iinjiistitiiible mid ( Tiu'l., as he may lie tiiereliy deprived of his best, if not his only. iiH'iiiis of (U'feuce. ■ To searcii a |)arty on his api^rehension, and, without scruple, to lake from him every particle of property in his ])o,ssession, without rciiiinl to the nature of the charge upon which he is ap|ireliended is not riii'lit, and is too frecjuently the course adopted by constables and other otficers, r|i(in tills subject, .^^r. Justice Patteson, in a case which came iHturc liiiu, remarked as follows : "The prisoner complain.s that his money was taken from him and that he was tlierel)y deprived of the means of nmklnii his defence. (Jenerally speaking, it is not right that a nnin's money shoidd be taken away from him, unless it is connected, in some way, with the property stolen. If it is con- nected with the r(ddiery, it is (|nite ])ro])er that it should hi' taken, lMit,\udess it is, it is not a fair thing to take away Ids money which lie nught re(juii'i' for his dcfen<-e." (1) Sonic imjiortant observations wen' also made, u])on this snbji^ct, liy Lord Campbell, ( '. .1., in the case of Hesscll v. Wilson. (2) In that case, which was an action of ti'esjtass. the plaintiff had been sniiinioned for an infringement of the (lopyrijht of Designs Act, and ordered to pay a tine and costs, upon non-|>ayment of which he wa> -^iiiiimoned to show ciuise why he did not pay according to the aiijuilieation : and, as he did not attend persomdiy, but only by counsel, toshow cause, lie was arrested, undera warrant to compel liis liei'Miiial attendance, and taken to |M'ison, where he was searched aiiil detained until iirought before the magistrates. Suitsequently, the conviction was (juashed ; and hence the plaiiititf'saction of tres- pass, in tlie eourst> of which, his Lordship said; "At the conclu- Moii iil'tlif trial of this case, fexpressed my disapprtdiation, — whidi I now ic|iei(t, — of the luannci- in wlii(di the plaintiff was searched "lien taken to the station-honst'. Tiiere is no right, in a case of tins kind, to inflict the indignity to which the plaintiff wassubjected. (1) R. V. O'Donneil, 7 C. & P.. 138. See also R. v. Kinsey, 7 C & P„ 449 R'V. <iritlitli8, 9.1. 1'. (iti. (2) Bcssellv. Wilson, 17.1. l'.. 52,567. 192 PEACTICAr. GUIDE TO MACUSTRATES. But 1 am intoi'iiuMl that an I'l-roneoiis iiii|trossi(Tii of what I said lias i^'onc aliroail, and tliat it has Ih'cmi siijiposo/l tliat I. assortoil that tiieiv was no ri<jht in any one to search a prisoner. I havo not said so. It is oi'ton liic duty of an otliccr to suan-h a prisoiu'r. If, for in- stanc't', a man is takt'U in Ihi' commission of a iVlony, lu' ma\' In' scarrlu'd to see whcthov the stolen articles are in his possession, oi- whether hi' has any instrument of violence ahout him. I have never said that scarehini;- a prisoner was a foi-hiddcn act What 1 said applied to circumstances such as existed in the present ca->e. If a tradcsnuin he charged with au otlence such as that with which the ])laintitV in the jiresent case was charged, and he apjjcar hy counsel and not in person and a warrant Ik- issued against him, not chai'ging him with any crime, hut merely to make him appear in person, the act of sear(diing him is contrary to law."' If, therefore, tlu' accuHod has been deprived of his property upcm his apprehension, an a|)i)liciition should l)e nuide to tlu^ Uiagistrate to order its restoration ; and if it ajiitcars to the justice, after due consideration of the circumstances, thai there is no connection lie- twei'U the suhjcct matter of the charge and the jpropcrty applied for, and that su(di propi'rty is not the produce of crimes which may form the subject (d'enipiiry, he will act wisely in ordering it to he restored, jirovided, of course, that tlu' projK'rty itself is not of a dangerous nature. 57<S. — lrr«')i;iiinrit^Y in l*ro<Mii*iiiK; A|»|»«>Hi'aii<*t'. — No irregularity or defect in the substance or form of the sum- mons or warrant, and no variance betwei'U the charge contained in the summons or warrant and the charge contained in the informa- tion, or between either and the evidence adduced on the part t>\' the prosecution at the inquiry, shall iitfect the validitv <d'any ])Toceed- ing a( or subsequent to (he hearing. This Article does away with all possibility of taking any technical objection to the information or complaint, oi' to the case as madt' out at the preliminary cn(|uiry. Jf the evi<lence ailduced tends to show (he comnnssion, by the accused, of an indictable otfcnci' — whethei' it be tlu' same as, or ilitferent from, the one (diarged by the information ()r comi)laint — the magistrate is bound to proceed upon and examine the evi<lence adduced, and to cithi'i' dis(diaigi' PKKLIMIN.\RY ENQUIRY. 193 f .11' ;i(i used — if lie ciiiisidtM's tl\t' evidence insufficient — or commit iiim fill- trial fni- (lie crime disclosed liy such evidence — it' he con- .-'(Ici's it sufficient. HiJii' — il«1j«»iiriiiii«^iit. ill CiiNO of Varinii«*<'. — Tf it iipiiciirs to tlie justice that the person charged has heen deceived or iiiiskMl hy any such variance in any summons or wai'rant, he may adjourn the hearinu; of the case to sonu' future "lay, and in tlie meanlimc may I'cmand siu-h person, or admit him to hail as herein- after nientioned. •IMO.— l*ro4'iii*iii};- tUv Attt'iidaiK't' of WitiicNNt'N.- If it a|»|)ears to the justice lliat any jierson, being or residing w/Y/art the province is iiUeiy to give material evideru'e either for the prose- cution tiy for the act-usi'd on such iii(|uiry, lu' nuiy iss\u' a summons under his hand, requiring such pei'son to ajipeai" hefoi'c him at a time and place nu'ntione^. therein to give evidence res]>ecting the charge, and to lu'ing with him any docunu'uts in his possession or- luider his control I'eiating theri'to. 2. Such summons nuiy he in the kok.m K in sciieiule one. or to the iiki' etfect. (1) HHi, — N€'i'vi«*o of !!4lliliiiloiiN for WitiiCNS. — Eveiy Mich summons shall he served hy a coiistahle or other peace otticer upon llie person to whom it is directed, either personally, or, if such person cannot convt'iiicnlly he met with, iiy leaving it for him at iiis last or most usual place of aliode with souuf inmate thereof aiiparcnlly not under sixteen years of age. Sec .\ ft. 5(12. and notes and authorities thereon, at p[i. 107. 108, onte, as to si'rvice of summons. A witness, upon heing serveil with tlu' summons or with a siih- pieria, cannot refuse to attend until his e.xptnses are paid : and it is not necessary, tlu'ivfore. to lendi'r him his expenses. (2) '>Ht2.— Wurruiil for 1%'ifiK'NN after Niiiiiiiioiin. — ilaiiv one to whom such last-mentioned sumnu)ns is direcleil does (1) I'or Form K, see p. 221), post. (-') H. V. .lames, 1 (". it P., 322 ; R. v. Took, 1 C. & P., 321. 194 ' PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. not appear at tlu' timo and jihifi' appoiiiti'd tlu'i-i>^iy. au<l no j\ist oxcuso is ofVeivd for siudi nou-appcaranci'. then (after proof upon oatli that snc-li ^sul^nlons lias buiMi sorvt^d as aforesaid, or tliat tlu' person to whom the summons is directi'd is Icrepinii' out of tiic wav to avoid service), the justice, before' whom such jicrson onylit ti> have ajjpeared. being .satisfied by proof on oath that he is liixoiy to give materia] evi(h>nce, may issue a warrant under liis hand to bring siudi ])erson. at a time and place to Ite therein mentioned, .before him or any other justice, in order to testily as aforesaid. 2. The warrant may be in the fokm L in scuedii.k one. (1) </r to the like effect. Such warrant may be executed anywhere within the territorial jurisdiction of the justice by whom it is issued, or. if necess;iry. endorsed as ])rovided in section 5(1;"). and executed any- where in the province but out of such jurisdiction. 3. If a person summoned as a witness under the provisions of this part is brinight before a justice on a warrant issued in consecpience of refusal to obev the summons, such person mav be detained on such warrant before the justice who issued the summons, or Ijefore any other justice in and for the sanu- territorial division who shall then be tliere, or in the common gaol, or any other place of contiue- meut, or in the custody of the person having him in charge, with a view to secure his presence as a witness on the day fixed for the trial ; or. in the discretion of the justice, such per.son ma}' be released on recognizance, with or without suretu-s. conditioned for his appearance to give evidence as therein mentioned, and to answer for his default in not attending upon the said summcms as for contempt ; and the justice may. in a summary manner, examine into and dispoBe of the charge of contempt against such ])erson. who. if found guilty thereof, may be fined orimpri.soned, or both, such fine not to exceed twenty dollars, and such im])ri.sonment to be in the common gaol. Avithout hard labour, and not to exceed one month, and may also be ordered to pay the costs incident to the .service and execution of the said summons and warrant and of his detention in custody-. (The conviction under this section may be in the for.m IT in scnEni:LE one. (2) (1) For Form L, see p. 230, poH. For Form of Deposition that a person is a material witness, see " Additional Forms" at end of this chapter. (2) For Form PP, see Forms at end of Chapter X, poH. PRELIMINARY ENQJriRY. — WITNESSES. . 195 o.h:<. — War rant I'wr Witii<'NN(>N in FirMt liiNtunoe. — It'tlu' justico is satisHi'd by evideiK'e. upon oath, that any person witliin till- i)i'ovin(.'0. liUoly to giyi- mutorial oyidcnee either for the proseention or for the aceused, will not attend to give evidence without being compelled so to do. then instead of issuing u sum- iimns, he may issue a warrant in the tirst instance. (1) Such wav- canl nniy he in the form M in sciieoii.e one of the Code. (2) or to the like effect, and may he executed anywhere Avithin tlie Jurisdic- tion of sucli justice, or. if necessary, endorsed as provided in section .")(>'). and e.Kecuted anywhere in the province hut out of sucl> juris- diction. I . !iH4m — l*ro4*nriiig; Att('ii<lan4*t' of Witnc'NM«'N bc- ;^'Oii<l til*' I*ro%'iii<'t'. — Jf there is reason to helieve tluit any |iersoii resiiling anywhere in Canada, out of the province, and not lieing Avithin the province, is likely to give material evidence either Inr the prosecution or for tlie accused, any judge of a superior court or a county court, on application therefor hy the informant or complainant, or the .Vttorney-(ieneral, or hy the accused per- son or his solicitor t)r some person authorized hy the accused, may cause a writ of sul)j)(ena to be issued under the seal of the court of which he is judge, requiring such per,son to appear before the jus- tice l.)efore whom the incpiiry is l)eing held or is intended to be held, at a time and place mentioned therein, to give evidence respecting the charge and to bring with him any documents in his ])osses8ion or under his control relating tliereto, 2. Such suhpiena shall be served personally u])on the person to whom it is directed anil an attidavit of such service by a person etfecting the same. purj)orting to be made before a justice of the |>eace. shall be sufficient proof thereof. ;{. If the person .served with a subpcena, us provided by this .section. does not appear at the time and place specified therein, and no just excuse is offered for liis non-appearance, the justice holding the inquiry, after proof upon oath that the suhpiena has been served, may issue a warrant under his hand directed to any constable or liiace officer of the district, county or place where such person is, or (1) Tor Form of Deposition, see " Additional Forms," po.f<. ' (2) For Form M, Bee p. 231, po.<i< 10(5 PRACTICAL OUIDK Tn MAGISTRATES. to all constablen or peace offlt'ers in suc-li district, county oi" jilacc, directing them or nuy of them to arrest such })erson and bring liim hcfore tlie said justice or any other justice, at a time and phico nu'utioned in sucli warrant, in ordei* to testify as iifonsaid. 4. The warrant maj- i)e in tlie kob.m N i.\ sciiemi i,e one. (1) or to the like effect. If necessary, it nia}' lie endorsed in the manner provided by section oti'). and executed in a <listrict. county or place other than the one therein mentione<l. l*ro«*iiriii{^ Alt«'iidan<*«> of* ii l*riM»ii<'i* tiis a Wit- iil'NN. — When the attendance of any person confined in an}' pri- son in Canada is re(|uired in any court of criminal jurisdiction in any case cognizable therein by indictment, the co\u't before whom such prisoner is required to attend may, or any judge of such court, or of any superior court or county court nniy. before oi" duriny any such term or sittings at which the attendance of such person is i-eciuired. make an order ujion the warden or gat)lcr of the pri.'^on. or u))on the sherilf or other ju-rson having the custody of such jtrisoner. to deliver such prisoner to the ))erson named in such order to receive him : an(l such person shall, at the timi' prescribed in such order, conve}- such prisoner to the place at which such j)erson is re([uired to attend, there to receive and obey siuh further order as to the said court seems meet. (Code, Art. (180.) T»kiii;i( Kvid(Mi4'4'. iiii(l«'r ('oiiiiiii.sNioii, of |>4>r- N01I l>»lig;i'roUNly 111. — Whenever it is made toajtpear at the instance of the ci'own. or of the prisoner or defendant, to the satis- faction of a judge of a sui)ei'ior court, or a jutlge of a county court having criminal jurisdiction, that any person who is dangerously ill, and who. in the opinion of some licensed medical iwactilionei", is not likely to recover from such illness, is able and willing to give material information relating to any indictalde offence, or relating to any ])erson accused of an}' sucli oflence. such judge nuiy. by order under his hand, ap))oint a commissioner to take in writing the statement on oath or affirmation of such person. Such commissioner shall take such statement and shall subscribe the same and add thei'eto the names of the persons, if an}', present (1 ) For Form N, see p. 232, post. EVfUKNCE INKKII r<lMMlSSI(»\. IHT at till' taking thoreot', anil, if tlu' (lei»ositioii ivhitcs toanv indiclai)!*' (ittencc tor wliicli any acciiM-d in-rsoii is already eiimiiiitti'd or haik'il l(» a[i]it'ar foi- trial, sliall traiisniit tin- >aiiu'. with tlicsaid addition, to the |in)|H;r otllcrr of till' I'onrt at \\iii(di sncli accnscd person is to lii' tried : and in o\ei'y oilier case lie sliall transniit liie same to the elerk of the jioace of the eonnty, division or city in whieh he has taken tlie same, or to suidi other otlieer as hasehar'j;e of the reeords and ])rofeedin<;'s of a superior court (d' criminal jur- isdiction in such county, division or city, and such clerk of the peace or other otticer shall pr.iserve the same and rile it (d' record, and upon order of the court or of a Judifc transmit the same to tjie proper otHcer of the court where the same shall he reijuircd to he useit as evidence, (("ode, Art. (iKl.) l*r«>Neii<*4' of* I'riNoiici* a( nik'Ii FiXaiiiiiiatioii. — Whenever a [irisoiier in actual custody is served with, or receives, notice of an intention to take the statement mentioned in the last jireceding section, the Judn'c who has ajipointi'il the coinniissionci" may, hy an order in writing', direct the otlieer or other person hav- iiii!,- the custody of the jirisoiier to convey him to the [ilace men- tioned in tiie saiil notice for the purpose of liciiiL!,' i)rescnt at the taking of the statement ; and such officer or other jicrson shall convey the ])ris<)ner accoi'dinglj'. and the expenses of such convey- ance shall lie ]iaid out of the funds apjilicalde to the other expenses • d'the jn'ison from which the prisoner has been conveyed. (Code. Art. (582.:) Koudiiig; WcpoNitioii 4»f' a Kick WitiiCNN ait tlio Trial. — Jf the evidence of a sick person has heeii taken under eommission. as provided in the aliovc section. (!S1. and upon the trial of any ottender for any offence to which the same relates, the [lersoii who made the statement is jiroved to lie dead, or if it is proved that there is no rcasonalde jirohaliility that siudi jierson will ever he able to attend at the trial to ,i;'ive evidence, siudi state- ment may, upon the production of tlie judge's onler ajipointing such commi.ssioner, he reail in evidence, either for or against the accused, without further proof thereof, — if the same ])ur[iorts to he signed hy the commissioner hy or hefore whom it purports to have heen taken, and if it is ]iroved to tiie satisfaction of the court that 1!>S I'llACTtCAl, (iUIKK TO .MAlilSTUATKS. 7 ensonaltle tiotice oi' i\n- intention to inkr siicli statrnu'iit teas served upon tlic jK'i'son (wIu'IIht proHeciitoi' of iiccuscd ) iigaiiist whom it is |ivi>|ioso(l to l)c I'l'iul in I'V'idiMici'. and that siicii pi'i'son oi- Ids C'ounsi'l ov solicitor hatl. ov nii,ii;hl have hail, il' he had eiiosen lo be present, full opiMirtiinity of eross-exainining the person who iniule the same. (Code. .\rt. fJSd) In viewed' the proviso at tiieend of this Article, (»S(!. no state- ment pr(dessedly taUcn undi'r the provisions thereof and under the provisions of Article (iSl. can he availahk' as such at tlu' trial, unless, hcfore taUinn" it, uotiec has been given of the intention to taUe it ; (]) and such notice must he in writing; otherwise the stalcnieut cannot at the trial he read against tlu' prisoner, although he may have l)een piv.sent when it was taUen and have had a full o]i]>ortuidty of cross-examination. (2) Tuliiiiu' fiVi4l«'ii<*o. l'n<l<'r 4'oiiiiiiiNNioii, of ^Vit- IICMM'M out of* (*lliia4la. — Whenever it is made tu ap- jicar. at the instance of the crown, oi- of the prisoner or defen- dant, to the satisfaction of tlie Judge of any su])erior court, or tlie judge of a county court having criminal jurisdiction, that any ])er- son who I'csidcs out of Canada is able to give nmterial information Vidating to any indictable otl'ence for which a prosecution is pend- ing, or relating to any per.son accused of such offence, such, judge m::iy, liy ordei- under his hand, ajjpoint a commissioner or commis- sioners to take the evidence, upon oatli, of such jjcrson rntil otiierwise provided by rules of court, the practice and ]tvocedure in connection with the appointment of commissioners under this section, the taking of depositions by such commissioners, and the certifying and return tliereof, and the use of such de])osi- tions as evidence at the trial shall be as nearly as practicable the same as those whi(di ])revail in the respective courts in connection with the like matters in civil caust's. (tV)de, Art. (JSH.) ^HH. — Coiniiiitiiiont of'a M'itneNN K('tiiNiii}>; tobc KxainiiK'd. — Whenever any person api)earing, either in obedi- ence to a summons or subpcena, or by virtue of a warrant, or (1) R. V. Quigley, L. T., N. S. 211, Mellor & Lush, J.I. (2) R. V. Shurmer, 17 Q. B. D. 323 ; 55 L. J. M. ('. 153. IHSI'HKTIONAKY I'OWEK.S < F THE KXA.MI \[.\tl .H STK K. l'.M> ln'iiiH' |>n'sfiil and liciiii^ vi'i'lially ri'qtiircd liy I lu' jiisticc to i;ivo cxidnu'i', I'l't'usi's to lie sworn. i>r having liccn sworn, ri-fuscs to an- swer siu'li ([uostions as arc ]iut to him. or rct'usi's oi' ncgU'cts to ]i1'o(1mcc any docnnicnts which ho in rtM^niri'd ti> |iroduci', or ict'usrs to sii;-n iiis depositions, without in any sn(di case oll'eriny any just, I'xruse tor su(di refusal, sueh justice may adjourn tin- proceeilings for any period not exoeediny ei^iit clear days and may in tjie meantime hy wai-rant in form O in sciiedi i.E one of the (,"ode, (I) or to the liUe etlV'ct, commit tlu' ])i'rson.so refnsiiiii-. to n'aol, un- less h(! sooui'r consents to do what is re(|nirc(l of him. If such person, upon heing hrought up. u|ii)ii such adjourned hearing, again refuses to do what is so re(|uired oi' him. the justice, if he sees tit. may again adjourn the })roceedings, and commit liim for the Jikt) jicriod. and so again IVom time to time until such |ierson consents to do what is rt'cpured of him. 2. Xothing in this section shall prevent smdi justice from si-nding any su( h ease tor trial, or otherwise dis])osnig of the sanu' in the meantime, according to an}' other suflicient I'vidence taken liv him. •>.S(>. — l>iK<*i*«'tioiiui\y l*ow«'r«« ol llio •liiKli«*4> at llio PiTliiiiiiiar.v i^xaiiiiiiatioii. — .V justii < iiojiiing i|h. prelimintiry iu(|uiry may, in his discretion : (rt. ) permit or refuse pernusssun to the prosecutor, his c<iun>el or attorney to address him in support of the (diarge, either liy wav ot' opening or summing \i\) the case, oi- by way of reply upon anv evidence which may he produced liy tlu' jierson accused : (b.) receive further evidence on the part of tiie [irosecutor afti'r iiearing any evidence given on hohalf of tlie accused ; {c.) a<ljourn the hearing of the matter. tVom time to time, and change the place of hearing, if, from the alisence of witnesses, the inahility ofa witness who is ill to attend at the place where the justice usually sits, or from any otlier reasonahle cause, it appears desiralile to do so, and may remand the accused, if re(|uired. Ii\ war- rant in the I'or.m J* in .>^CIIE1)L l.E one of the Code : (2) I'rovided that no such remand sliall he for more than eight clear da\s, the (1) For Form 0., see p. 233, post. (2)' For Form P, see p. 234, post. -(M> IMIACTICAI. iJI IIpK Th M A II ISTIl ATK.S. (liiy rolliiwiiij^ tli;ii mi w liidi ilic i-ciiiiin<l is mimiIc licini;' I'luiiilcil as 1 lir lii'st (lay ; a ml t'urt Iht |iMPvi(lri|, I ha I it' the rem a ml is I'nr a liiiic ihil cxccciliiii!,' llii'<'r clear ilays^ I he justice ina\' vcrlialh' ni'ilcr llic ciiiislalilc iii'Dtlici- |M'i'siiii ill wliiiM- ciislddy tlic accused IJicii is. iiy any nilier iii!i>,ialile nv |iersini iiaiiieil liy I lie justice in thai. Iiehall. lu i<cc|) the accused iiei'snn ill his cusindy and lo iii'iiii;- liini liid'nfe I lie same or siii'h other justice as shall he t here aiMiiii; at I lie tunc a|i|ioiiiied I'm' cuni iniiiiii:' the cxaiiiiniitiMU ; (<l.) order thai iio |pei-mi, of/n'r tli<iu fin; /iroairiitor and ocuscil. t/ti'ir counsel ond solid f'lr, ^hall have accesN to nr remain in the room or Imildiiiii' in which i lie iiii|uiry is held, (wjiich slut 1 1 not he an ()|)en court), if it ajijiears lo Inm thai l he ends o|' justice will he hest answered hy so (loiny ; (('.) reu;nlali' I he eoiir^e ol' I he iiH|niry in aii\' \\a\' \\hi(di nia\' a|i|pcar lo him desirahle, and w hi( h is not iiieimsisti'iit wil h liie pi'u- vi^imis (d' I he < 'ode. • ll will he seen hy I his a ft icie ( pa I'. '/j t hilt I he justice's power to exclude pefscnis from I he place of holdiun' the pivdiminary i'm(uiry docs not extend to I he cminsel or solicitor of cit lier of the pari ies ; and that. here, as well as in .\rticle .')!((!. post, there is a distinct rccou-iiiiiiiii iif ill,. dcf(.ndanl s riii'iit to he represeiil"d. !it tlie pre- liminary em|uiry. hy hi-- eoun>cl or solicitor. A4*4MIK('4l l*«'r!^4»ll*<i I'lMlf'l* Sixl4'«>ll 1 4» l»«> li«'|»t M4'pail*ill<'. >ouiii:- persons apparently under I lie an'c of sixteen w ho are : — (a) arrested upon any warrant, or (A) cimnnitled to custody at any sta^'c of a preliminary emjiiiry into a (diar^'c for an indiclahle otfence. or (c) committed to custody at any stai^e of a trial, either for an indlctahlc ollence oi' for an olfeiice punishahle on suiiimary con- \i( timi. or (a') committed to custody after siudi trial, hut hefcu'e impriscui- ineiit uinler sentence. — SHAM, lie kept in custody separate from older pci'.sons charn'cd with criminal olieiices ami scjiiiratc from all persons un(ler(joinij I'ltKI.IMINAIIV KNI^I IIIV. IIAII. UN llEMANIi. 20.1' Hi'titences of imprimnmcnt. jiimI sii.m.i. mit he ciiiirnuMl in tlic locU- ii|is or |)(>lic(' sliitioiis witli iildci' imtsiuis cliiir^fd witli criiniiiiil (itlciici's. 11(11' witli iii'diiiary (•i'imiii;ils. (I) Ai'liclf ri.">(l (iT I lie Ci'iiniiiiil ('(i<ic. as oriijinally passi-d. diff(t<'(| I lie trial id' |h'1S(ims apliarciil ly iiiidcf si.\t(H'ii vi'ars of iif^c to tiil<n |>lac<' wit limit |iuliiicity. and sc|tai')ifrly and apafl IVoin tliat of i-tlifi- ar(iiM'i| |M'i's(ins. so I'd r <ts if xhoulil iipfii'dr cxiiedient and /iracti- < itlilc. Hut tliis aftitli' lias, at tlic last session ol' Parliament. Iteeii lelVaiiH'd, l.y stfiUinu,- out tlie words almve italicized, and thus inakini!,' it i \ii'K(t ati \ K tliat tlie trials of all yoiinii,' persons, appai'ently under tlie ai,'e td' si.\teen years, siiai.i, take plai-e witlioni pulilieity. and separately and apart IVom llie trials o|' otliei- ae( Used persons, (li) .>M7'« -Ifiilil **** llt'lliaild. — II' tlie aceiised is remanded under tlie next preeedini;' sect ion. t lie justice may discdiar^-e iiiiii, upon liis eiiterinu,' into a reeoi;'iiizaiiei' in tlie koii.m (^ in sciiKlni.K o\K.(;!) with (U' wit liont siir«-ties. in the discretion of 1 lie Justice, eonditioiicd for his appiaraiiet' at the time and place ap|iointeil for the eontinuaiice <>!' the exainiiiatioii. •IMS.- ll«'iiriiiK- ytny hv <lr4l«'i*«'d to l*r<M'<'«'d during; ill«' lime 4»f' lt«'lliail«l.— The Justice may order tin* accused jierson to Ix' liroiiu'lit Ixd'ore him. or liefore any othiT justice for the same territorial division, at any time hefore tlm expiration id' llie time for whitdi such person has heeii remanded, ami the u;aoler or otlicer in whose oiistody he then is shall <luly oliey sindi order. rSMII.— Ilr«>a4*li 4>r lt4'<*4»)>;iiiK»ii<'<' 4»ii If4'iiiaiii4l. — If tlu'aci'used person does not appoar at the time and place mentioned in the recogni/.anOe. the said Justice, or auy other justice who is then and there presi-nt. having- certified upon tlie hack of the reeogni/',- aiici' the iion-ap|iearaiice of sindi accused person, in the fokm U in scilKitri.K ONK of the Code, (4) may transmit the recogiiiziiiico (1) 57 & .-),s Vic, c. 58, sec. L'. (2) 57 & 58 Vic, c 58, sec 4. (o) For form Q, see j). 2155, pOKt. (4) For form R, see p. 230, post. •202 I'HArTir.M, (irn»K to .maqistrates. to till' dork of llif couvt wlicrf tlu- accusi'd porsmi is to lie tried, orotlu-r projuM" ulticcr a|iii()int(.'(l liy liiw. to l)c proci'i-dod iipoii in liUi' luiuiiu'r as otluT rocogiiizaiici's ; and su(di ci'rtiticati' slnill \n' prima facie i^yuWuci.' ol' the non-appcai'anco of (he aci'iisi'd |it'r- sou. ■ . ' ' ■ 51*0. — KvidoiK'i' Tor tlie l*ro>*o<*iilioii.— Win n ilio accnsi'd is bctbri' a justice lioidinii- an in(}niry. siudi jiisliio shall take the evidenei' of the witnesses called on the i)art ot' tlu' prosecution. 2. 'I'hi' evidence (tf the said witnesses shall lie iriven upon oath. and in the presence ot' the accusi'd ; and tlie accused, his counsel oi- ,)licitor. shall lie entitled to cross-exanune them. ;5, The cvideiH'c of eaidi witness shall he taken down in writing- in the foi'iH <d' a deposition. Avhieh may lie in the foum S in scuK.nri.K ONK. (1) or to I he like elfcct. 4. Su(di deposition shall, ut some time before tlie accused is callc(l on for liis defence, he read over to and signed hy the witui'ss and till' justice, the accused, the witness and justice heiny all present together at the linieofsiudi reading and signing. "). The signature td' the justice may eitliei' he at the end of the deposition of each witness, nr at the end of several nicilall the depositions in siudi a form as to show that the signature is meant to aulheiiticate each separate deposition. (!. livery justice hulding a preliminary iiKjuiry is herehy rei|uii'ed to cause the depositions to he written in a legihle hand and on <ine side only of ea( h sheet of paper (111 w hieh they are w ritten. 7. Provided thai the e\ ideiice upon suidi ini|uiry <ii' any jiart of 1 he same may he taken in shorthand l;y a stenographer who may he ap[)oiuli'd I ly the justice, and w ho he fore acting shall make oat h that he shall truly and faithfully I'eporl the evidence; and. where evi- ileiice is so taken, it shall not he necessary that such evidence he read over to or signed hy the witness, hut it shall hesulHcieiit if the transci'ipt he signed hy the justice and he aceomiianied hy an alli- davit of the steiiograplier that it is a true reporl of the evidence. (1) For form S, see p, 2;)(>, post. EVIDKNCE Knli THE I'Ki ISKCITID.N. 20:> This Articlo ('X|ircssly |ir(ivi(lcs tliiil tlic iiccuscd, his coiuiscl. or solicitor siiall In- fiitilird to cross-cxitiiiiiK' thi- witnesses for tlie jiro- secution ; and it thus reeon'iiises the riglit of the (Ud'eiKhmt to lie represented, at the prelinunary investiifidinn. liy Ins eiumsel or attorney. It also |)rovi(h's that the evidence of the witnesses shall lie given in the presence of the accused, and, therefore, the preliminary en- quiry eanni)( lie pi'dceeded with in his ahstMU-e. A defendant charged with tlu' coniniissii)n of an indictable ott'ence is not to lie ealleil n]M)\\ \n plead ; hut the case is to he suhstanliated against him, in the first instanct' ; for, with tlu- cxce|ition of the CJlses provided \\,v ],y .\rlieles 7()5, 783 and Sin, post, justices have no I'ower in indietalile otl'ences to deal witli the accused, sum- marily, even tlmiigh he openly ailnut his guilt. The manner iif taking the de|iositions varies : In some places it is usual in all indietalile eases to take down the e\idem-e in the form of a depo'^ition. at once ; in o t he rs, a 1 il i re \'i a ted notes are taken of the examination hefore the tnagistrate, copied vi'rhatim, and afterwards read o\-er to t he witnesses in the [iresenciMd' theacciised, the l.ittei' lia\ing cwvy opportunity of cross-t'xamination and of uuiking oliieciions. The former of these two modes is the more eorri'ct : luit the latter has lieen approved, and depositions so taken have heen held admis>il)le. (1) [f the latti'r plan is adoptetl, the depositions should he merely a plain copy of tiie notes; and the clerk >honld not. in the alisence of the nnigistrate, ask the witni'sses any (iiiestions to i'om|iletc the depositions; (2) even though tln^ accused he ])resent at the tinu'. (i!) The e\idence shmild he taken down as nearly as jiossihle in the witness' own w<irds, and the (h'position should contain the cross- exam i mi lion and re-examination as well as the examination in child'; and any inlerrnplion or ohservation which may he made hy the accused should also he taken down. It may he evidence against him. (t) Hut it should he made to appear. n)>on the depositions, under what circumstances t he ohsi'rvation was made. (."> ) (\) K. V. Bales, 2 F. ^ F. olT. (•-') U. V. Chri.stoi.her, 14 .1. 1'. 83; 10 L. J. M. C. 103. (;!) U. v. Watts, 33 L. .1. M. C. 63, (4) R. V. Siripp, 1.'5 L. .1. M. C. 109. (o) See K. v. .larvis, L. K. 1 ( '. C. R. 94 ; 37 L. J. M. C. 1. - - 14 204 PRACTICAL (HTDE TO MAGISTRATES. liitcrc'Mt oi* CViiiie. iio liar to a WitiicMN* C'oiii- pi't*'H«*y.— A i)erson simll not be iiicoinpoteiit to j-ive evidence by reason of interest or cri; . (Can. Ev. Act. 1S1),'{. SO A'ic. e. HI, see. .{). Act'iiNCMl uiid lliiMhaiKl aii«1 Wife ('onipetciit. — Every per.son charged witii an otience. and the wife or hu.-^jjand, us the case may be, ot'thi' |)er.son so charged, shall be a conij)etent witness, whether thi' person so charged is charged solely or Jointly with any other per.son. Provided, however, that no husband shall be com])etent to disclose any connuunication made to him by his wife during their marriage, and no wife shall be competent to dis- <'iose any communication made to her by her husband during their nnirriage. (Can. Ec. Act, iSttli, .see. 4). ^'iiiiibor of WitneMSON Xooessary. — As a rule, one witness is stitlicient. if he can prove tlu' necessary facts, liut, with regard to certain ottences. it is specially provided by Article 6S4 of the Criminal Code that no pei'scm charged with any ol' such of- fences shall lie convicted u]»on tlu' evidence of one wit ni'ss. unless such witness is corrolioratcd. in some material particular, liy evi- di'iiee im])licatiug the accused. The oHences subject to this special ])i'o\isioii ari' the following : KoROEKV. (Article \'1'.\ of the Code.) I'erjiry. (Articii' 1 Mi.) I'RociRi.Nu A Feioned Marriacje. (Article 277.) Sedi CTioN ANii Defilement OF Females. (Articles ISl to l!K».) Treason. (Artick' (If).) flrderiii^ Wiliio«N<'N l^iit of Court. — On the a]i|>li- cation of either of the partu's. an order will, as a general rule, be given for all witnesses, except the one nndei- exanunation. to leave the court. This order may be applied for at any stage of the eufjuirv. and it is rarely withheld ;(1) alth(Uigh the authoi'ities are somewhat contlicting as to whether it can i>e denutnded of strict right, especially with regard to a jirisoner. (2) (1 ) Southey v. Nash, 7 C. it P. 632. (2) Stark. Kv. 162; 2 Tayl. F.v. S Kd., sec. 1400; R. v. Cook, 13 How. St. Tr. ;W8; R. v. Vaiighan, Ih., 4W4. EVIDENCE MrST. AS A RILE. HE KI'O VTII. 205 If any of tlu' witnesses ivinain in court aftor an ordov lias hc'cn made to withdraw, the justiees will have no right to oxelude llieir ti'stiniony, however niueh the witness" wilful disohedienee of the order may lessen the value of his evidence. {I) With regai'd to ordering witnesses out of court, an exception is made in favor of medical witnesses when their evidence is merely to nu'dii-al facts. And. of co.irse, the defendant, although he is to lie called as a witness, will also luive the right to renuiin. F.vi«l<'ii4'4' j^ffiiNt. UN a Kiilo. I»e 1'|ftoii Oatli. — The second ]i;iragra|ih of the aiiove Article. ')[){). rc(|uires the evidence of the witnesses to he given tipon oath. But a person who. when called upon tt) give evidence, objects, on grounds of c(»nscieutiou8 scruples, to take an oath, or who is obi-ct''d to as incompetent to liike an oath. , lay (hy virtue of section 'IH of the Canada Evidence Act. isy3) make an aHirinatiou in the following form : • I solemnly allirin that the evidence to he given by me shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing hut the truth." And upon maknig such sok'nin atiirmalion. llu' I'vidence of the person so atlirming is to be taken, and to have the same etlect as if taken under oath. The general form of oath is as follows . — "The evidence you shall give touching thi> information (or complaint, or the jiresent chanje, or as the case may he), wherein is the ii\formant (or complainant, or. ns the case may be), and is the defendant ((u* as the case may he), shall lie the irulh. the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help you <iod." The N\'W Testament should, if tlu' witness is a Christian, be held by him in his right hand, dui'ing the adminiKtration of the oath ; and at its conclusion he should ki-^s the book. The form of oath is to be accommodated to the religious perssuu- sion which the swearer entertains of (iod. and is to be administered in such a manner as is binding on the witness' conscience. (:i) (1 ) Chandler v. Home, L' M. A Rob. 42:? ; Cobbett v. Hudson, '22 U J. Q. H. 13. (2) Uoacoe. Ev. 5 Ed. 122. 206 PKACTICAL (iUIDE TO MAdrSTRATES. It' a iRTson ottered as a witness atlinits tliat he lias no helicf in (rod or in a future state, lie eaunot he sworn, and. formerly iiis evidence could not he received at all. (1) Hut \hc Evidence Aviendment Act, l^Ci\h (2) made an imiiortunt change, in lOngland. Section 4 of that Act providt'd that, if any jierson called to give evidence in any Court of Justice should ohjecl to take an oath, or he ohjected to as incompetent to take an oath, such per.son should, upon the presiding judge heing satisfied that the taking of an oath would have uo hinding ett'cct on his con- science, make a solemn ])romisc and declaration to tell the truth. ■\nd. in the famous case of ('larkc v. Hradlaugh. it was held hy .>[athews. J., (contirmed in Appeal), that, although the Act did not give to a memher of parliament, hnvimj no relir/ious belief, the right to atiirm instead of taking the oath rc(|nired of him iiy the Farliavientary Oaths Act. ISiJG. (:>) heforc taking his seat in ilu' jrouse.it enahled and even required ii<jrH{)\\s. having no religious be- lief and upon ivhose consriewe on oath woul<l have no binding effect, to ifi\e evidence, hv solemnlv atlirming and dcidarin"- instead of swearing. (4) Later on, it was enacted, by the OatJis Act, 1888, (5) that, in all jilaci's. and i'i)v all purposes, where an oath is rc(]nirc(l. hy law. every Jierson. u]ion o'ljccting to iV' sworn and stating as the ground of such ohjection. either, that he has i\o religions helicf. or that the taking of an oath is contrary to his i-eiligious belief, shall he pei- niitti'd to make his solemn declaration and atHrnnition, instead of taking an oath, ami that snch atlirmation shall he ol' the same elVect as if he had taUeii the oath. Ill Canada, we lia\'e now. in elVeet. the same law. in section 'S.'t ot the Canada Evidence Act, ISiKJ. supra. A witness who stati's that he is a Christian caiimjt he furlher ([Uestioiied hefiu'c heing sworn. ((!) (1) Anon,\ Leach, ;J41 (ii); R. v. White, I Leach, 430, Maden v- Catau- agh. 2<i J. P. 248. (•_') 3-'-:);'. Vic, (Imp.), c. tis. (3) lili Vic. (Imp.), c. 29. (4) Clarke v. Bradlaugh, L. 1!., 7 <i. 15. D. lis. (5) 51-52 Vic. (Imp.), c. 47, sec. L ((i) R. v. Serva, 2 ( '. \ K. 56. MOUES OF ADSirNISTERINO THE OATH. 207 A .]v\\ is sworn on tlu> Pontateiicli, an'l he keeps his head covered •<hiving the administration of the oath. (1) But a Jew who stated that he professed Ciiristianity. althougli he had never been ba])- tized. and hail never formally renounced the Jewish faith was billowed to bi^ sworn on the Xew Testament. (2) A Mahomedan is sworn on the Koran. I'lacing his right hand Hat upon the book and the other liand to his foreliead, he brings tlie toji of his forehead down to the book, which lie touches with his head. He then looks, for some time, upon it ; and. being asked whiit elfect that ceremony produces, he answers that he is bound by it to s])eaU tin- truth. (H) A Parsee swears in a similar nuinuer. except that instead of the i\onui. he swears upon the Parsee prayer book. (4) Tart of the ceremony of swearing a (ientoo (a native of India or Iliudostan professing the Hrahmin religion) consists in his touch- ing, with his hand the fool ot a Brahmin. If the witness, him.self, is a priest, he touches the Brahmin's haml. (5) This, however, does not ai)pear to be the only mode of swearing among the Hindoos ; and it seems that, in some parts of India, the natives swear on a portion of the waters of the (ianges. (6) A Chinese witness on entering tlie witness box. kneels down, and a china saucer being placed in his hand, he breaks it against the box. The clerk then aihninisters the oath to him (through the interpreter) in these words. — ■ Vou shall tell the truth and the whole truth ; the saucer is cracked, and. if you do not tell tlie truth, your soul will be cracked, like the saucer." (7) It is said that, in the Island of Ilong Kong, even since it became an lOnglish possession, jiart of the ceremony of swearing a riiinese (1)2 Hale, P. C 279 ; (hnichund v. Barker, Willes' Kep. u4() ; Roscoe Kv. -■> K<]. 12;i. (2) R. V. Gilhaiu, 1 Esp. 285. (8) R. V. Morgan, 1 Leacli.C. L., 54. Hoaooe Ev., 5 Ed. 123. (4) Kerr'a Maj?. Acta, 21 ; Best on Ev., U*i'X (■>) Omichund v. Barker, 1 Atk. 22. (()) Best on Kv., 'iUY.\. (7) Eatrehman'8 Case, 1 C. & Mar. 248. 208 ,, PRACTrrAL orinK to magtstratks. witness consists in cuttinu: ott' llic lu'ad of a iivo cdck oi-dthci' fowl. (1) A witness, who stated tliat he believed iioth the Old and Xew Testament to be the word ot'(iod. bnt that as tlie latter proiiiljited and the t'ormer eountenaneed swearing, he wished to be sworn on the former, was perniitted to be sworn aeccn'dinjujly. (2) And. where a witness refused to be sworn by laying his riyhl hand on the book, and afterwai'ds kissinj*; it. but desired to be sworn ly having;' the liook laid open Ijefore him and holding up liis right hand, he was sworn accordingly. QV) Where, on a trial for higli treason, a wilnt'ss retused to be sworn in the nsual manner, but put his hands to his buttons, and in reply to a (juestion whethei- he was sworn stated thai he was sworn and was under oath, it was held snttieient. (4) A Scotch witness has bei'U allowed to be sworn by holding up the hand without touching the liook. or kissing it. and the foi'iu of oath administered to him was. • ^'on swear according to the custom of 3'our conntry and of tlie religion you profess that tlie evidence, etc.. etc." (5) Liu'd (ieoi'ge (iordon. before he turned Jew. was sworn in the same manner, upon exhibiting .\rticles of the jieaee in the King's Bench. ((I) • \. The following is given as tlie form of oath of a Scotch ('oxenan- ter : — •' I. A. ii.. do swear. l)y (lod himself, as 1 shall answer to him at the great day of judgment, that the evidence i shall give. tonching the nuitter in question, is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. " (7) An Indian, who was not a ("hi'istian. and who knew of no cere- mony, in use among his tribe, for binding him to speak the truth, was offered as a witness in a murder trial. As lieappeare(l to have a full sense of the ol)ligation to speak the truth, and as he and his (1) Berncastte's Voya^'e to China, 'M ; 2 Rest on Kv. SKi.'!. (»). ('-') Fdnionds V. Rowe, Ky. i*t Moo. N. P. C. 77. (3) Dalton v. Colt. 2Sid. (i. ■■■ (4) R. V. Love, 5 How. 8t. Tr. 113. (5) R. v. Mildrone, 1 Leach, 319, 412; Mee v. Ueid, I'oake, N. 1'. C 2:!. (6) Rcscoe Ev., 5 Ed. 123. (7) 1 Leach, 412 (n). ^ V . >? ,r EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES. 20!> tribe Iwul ii liclict' in a Supreme Hoiiii";. wlio ereated all things, and in a future state of ivward and punishment, he was allowed to be sworn in the usual way on the New Testament, and his evidence was lield admissihle. if. however, his tribe had had in uso among thom any particular eereniony for binding- them to speak the truth, the witiu'ss would have had to bo sworn according lo that ceremony, however strange and fantastical it might be: because everything should 111' doni' that can be done to bind the I'onscience of the wit- ni'ss according to his notions bowcvi-r supi'rstilious they may b(^ (1) KvirteiK't' or.llllto. — .V witness who is unable to speak may give his evideiu'C in any otiier numner in which he can muki' it intelligible. (2) l<jvi(l«'ii4«o «»!' Foroi);;'!! %Vitii «•>*•«»»'«,— A witness who does not speak the language spoken l<y the justice should be sworn, and give his evidence through the nu'dium of another per.son duly qiuUitied to inter|)ret him. the inter[)reter being tirst sworn faithliiily to interpret what the witness may say. The oath of the interpreter may be as follows : — ■ •■ You shall truly and faithfully inti'riPi'et the evidence about to be given, and all other matters and things toindiing the present int'orinatioii (i)V charf/c. or as the case may be), and the Italian (or (ierman. or as the case mai/ he) langmige into the i-]nglish (or French) langiuige. and the Kngiish (or French) latigiuige into the Italian (or German, or. as the case may be) language, according to the best of your skill and aiiilit)'. .So helji you. <io(l." Kxuiiiiiiatioii in <iii«>t'.~lii e.Kamination in chief, a witness must not, as a rule, be asked any leailing questicms. that is. ([uestions in su(di a form as to suggest the answers (lesin'd, (3) There are. however, several exce]itioiis to this rule. It is not applied, for instance, to that part of the examination which is merely introductory of that which is material. (4j And even (1). K. V. Pah-mah-jray, 20 U. C. Q. B. 195-198. (2) Van. Ev. Act, 1)39;5, sec. 6. (3) 2 Tayl. Ev. 8 Ed., sec. 1404; 1 Stark. Ev. 1(«9. (4) Nicholls V. Dowdint', 1 Stark. R. SI "JIO PRACTICAI. (ilTDE T(i M.\(i ISTHATKS. Avith ri'ganl to luiitoriiil })(>ints. K'iidiiiii; ([urstions may sonu'tiini's Ik' allowi'il to 111' put ill a direct t'xaminatioii ; as. for iiistaiK;e. Avliore tlie witness b^' his coiuluct in the hox obviously appears to lie hostile to the party jirodncing him. or interested for the other party, or unwilling- to give evidence. (I) So. where the oiijeet is identification, a witness may lie directed to look at a particular person, and say whether he is the man. (2) A witness will sonn'times he allowed to be led wlieiv an omission in his testimony is evidently causetl by want of recollection, which a sivjijes'lon may assist. Thus, when a witness stated tliat he could not recollect the names of the members of a tirm. so as to re|)eai them without suggestion, this was permitted to be <lone. (;>) Where a witness is called to establish a contradiction, leading (questions Juay be allowed. Kor instance, where a witness was called to contradict another respecting the contents of a lost letter, it was held that after exliausting the witness' memory as to the contents of the U'tter. he might be ashed if it contained a ]iarticu- lar passage recited to him. (4) And. where a witness was called to contradict another who hud denied having used certain expres- sions, counsel was permitted to ask whether the particular words /lenied were not in fact uttered by the former witness. (5) C'roKN-Kxniiiiiitif ion. — in cro.ss-examiiiation. leading ques- tions may in general be asked ; but this does not mean that counsel may go the length of putting into the witness" mouth the very words whicli he is to echo back again ; (0) nor does it .sanction the jtutting of a question, assuming that facts have been jiroved which have not been proved, or that particular answers have been given, contrary to I lie fact. (7) The rule sho\dd also receive some further ([ualitication where the witness is evidently hostile to the party calling him ; for, although (1) R. V. Chapman, 8 C. & P. 559. (2) K V. De Berenger, 2 Stark. R. 129 {») ; R. v. Watson, .•')2 How. St. Tr. 74. (3) Acerro v. Petroni, 1 Stark. R. 100. {4) Courteen v. Touse, 1 Campb. 43. (5) Edmonds v- Walter, 3 Stark. R., 8. (6) R. V. Hardy, 24 How. St. Tr. 659, 755- (7) Hill V. Coombe, at. 1 Stark. Ev. 188, n. ?). EVIDENCE T<t UK READ To THK ACCI.SKD. 211 it a|t])oiirs to have hcen laid (Uiwn in oiio catsi- that leudiug questions may always lie ])ut in cross-i-xaniinatioii. whether a witness be willing or not. (1) some restriction should surely be imposed where the witness betrays a vehement desire to serve the cross-examining j.arty. (2) Ke-Kxuiiiiiiutioil. — A re-examination should be confined to showing the true color antl beai'ing of the answ«'rs elicited by tlie cross-examination : and. without the permission of the court, new facts and new matter, not tending to explain the witness' answers in cross-examination, should not be allowed to be gone into. (8) KviddiiH' of Voiiii|)^ Child. — Section 25 of the Canada Evidence Act, 1S!»8. provides that in any legal proceeding where a child of tender years is tendered as a witness, and such child does not. in theopiiuon of the jiulge. Justice, or other jiresiding officer, understand the nature of an oath, the evidence of such child may be received, though not given upon oath, if, in the opinion of the judge, justice. 'or other presiding officer, as the case may be, such diild is possessed of sufficient intelligence to justify the reception of the evidence, and understands the duty of speaking the truth ; but that no ease shall be <lecided upon such evidence alone, and that such evidence must be corrol»orated by some other material evidence. 5!ll. — Kvidenee to bo road to the Aoousod. — After the examination of the witnesses produced on the ]»art of the prose- cution has been completed, and after the (le])ositions have been signed as aforesaid, the justice, unless he discharges the accused person, shall ask him whether he wishes the depositions to be read again, and. unless the accused dis])enses therewith, shall read or cause theni to be read again. When the depositions have been again read, or the reading dispensed with, the accused shall be addressed b^' the justice in these words, or to the like ett'ect : "JIaving heard the evidence, do you wish to say anything in answer to the charge ? You are not bound to say anything, but (1) Parkin>, Moon, 7 C. & P. 409. (2) 2 Tayl. Ev. 8 Kd., sec. 1481. (3) Prince v. Same, 7 Ad. i<: E. 627 ; Queen's Case, 2 B. & B. 297. -'- l'H.\( rrcAl, (illDK TO >rA(USTHATKS. wlmtovcryoii do sav will lie taken down in writinuf mid iiiav lit- ifivcii inovidi'iicfai'-ainst you. at your trial. Voii must c'U-arly inidiTstaud lliut you liavi' iiolliiii<r to 1io|k' iVoin any ]ironiise ot favour and noiliing to ti'ur tVoni any tlircai wliicli may luivc licfii ln-id out to you to iiidiu'c you to iiuiUi' any admissio?) Or coiili'ssion ol'ifuilt, liut whatever you now say nniy lie .u;iven in evideiu-e against you n|ion youi- trial, not witlistandinif suidi [ironiise or tlireat." 2. Wluitever tlie accused tlien says in answer thereto shall he taken down in writini; in the i-'okm T in scMEitri.E o.ne. {\ ) or to tlie like etlect. and shall he signed hy the Justice and !<e)it with the de|iositionsofllie witnesses and dealt with as iierei natter mentioned. The caution contained in this Article is two-fold. In the tirst part of it. the accused is told tiuit iu' is not hound to say anything, hut that wliatever iu' does say will he written down and may bo given in evidence against liim at liis trial; and. in Iheseeonil part, he is told that he must clearly understand that hi' has nothing to hope from any promise of favor and nothing to tear from any threat whii h may have heen hehl out to him to induce iiim to make any admission or confession of guilt. Although the second part of the caution is only of imj»ortance in cases where some prt'vious prcunise of favoi- or thi'eat has. iu fact, heen held out. (J) it is better, in all cases to give both parts «d' the caution, as the Justice nuiy not have tlu' nutans ot' knowing whether a ]>ri'vious promise of favor or tiuvat lias been held out or not. ,; . 'I"lu' (diject of giving the caution eoulaine(l in the above Articde is to t'uable the prosecution to give in evidence upon tlie trial of the accused, any contessiou oi- iulmission that he may afterwai'ds make, notwithstanding any previous promise of favor or threat that may have been held out to him. ' ■ ' ' ' - The stateinciil made by t he accused jierson before the justice may if necessary, upon tlK' trial of smdi person, bi' given in evid- • K'lice against him. without further proof thereof, unless it is jiroved that the Justice did not iu fact .sign it. (('odo. Art. (iS!);. (1 ) For Form T, see p. i';'>7, pout, (•J) K. v. Sansome, 1 Den. C. ( '. 545 ; 1!J L. J. M. C. HS. N KVIDKNOE (iK f'<iNKEHSION oil AriMr-iSinN. 218 Whon tlio torrn pi'i'S('i'ili('(l Ity tln" ahovf Aiticlc ')!»!. is |n||()\vc(|, tin- prisoiuTs stiid'iiu'iit imrpoi'tiiii!; to \h' atlt'stcd liy tin- sin'iiiitiiro of iIk' exiiiiiiiiin^ Justice thus iiuiUfs proof of itself. uikKt Arli- clo (>S!t. Mut. wlu'ii till' prt'scrilu'd form has not hcen followed, the caution, the prisoner's statement, and the Justice's si^'nature may still he proved liy tlie Justice, oi" his clerU. oi- l>y some per- son who was present at tlie examination. (1) {S1II2.— f'Vid<'iic«' 4»r €'oiit«'.NHi4»ii 4»r AdiiilNMioii. — Nothini^ herein conliiincd shall present any prosecutor from ^iviiiuj in evidi'uce any atlniission or confession, or other statement made at any tinu' hy the person accused or chari^'cd. which, hy hiw. would lie admisMii)le. A confession must, in order to he admissahle. he entirely free and voluntary. Wiien it is oiitained from the accused hy the (latti'ry of hope or the torture ot' ft'ar. it comes in so (|ncstionahle a shape, when it is to he consi(leri'd as evidence of i;Mnh. that no. reliance can he |ilaced upon it. and no credit should he ni\en to it. 'I'aUe the followiui;' case as an I'xample : — 'I'lirce men wci'c tried and con\icte(i n\' tiic murder id' a .Mr. Harrison. One of tiiem. undei' promise of |)ai'don. confessed him- self guilty of tlu' fact. Thi' confession, tlu'refore. was not n'ixen in evidence a.^'ainst him; an<t a few years afli-rwards it turned out that .Mr. Harrison was still alive, (."i) 'I'he confession will not he adnussihie. if it he procured hy a threat to take the defendant hid'ore a maifisti'ate utdess he i;ivi' a mort' sutisfiu'tory account. (4) or hy a threat to send for a constable for that purpose ; (5) or hy .sayiuii,-, -'I'dl me where the thiiii^s ari', and I will he favonrahle to you ; " (d) or hy saying, •' Von luul hetter split, and not sutfer for all id' them ; " (T) or hy (1) R. V. Boyd, 1!) L. .1. M. ('. 141 ; U. v. Uearn C tt M. 109. (2) Gihb. Ev. 123; R. v. Eldrid>re, R. & H., ('. C. R., 440. (3) 2 Hale, 2S5 ; R. v. \Varrin>.diam, 2 Den. 447; WarwickshallV case, 1 Leach, 2(j3. . , . ,, ; (4) R. V. Thompson, 1 Leach, 29. , (5) H. V. Richards, 5 C. ,& P. ;^18. («) R. V. Cass, 1 Leach, 29;{. Sre aho R. v. McCafferty, 25 S. C, N. B. 3!>i;. (7) R. V. Thomas, « C. & P. 353. 214 I'ltACTrcAI, (ini)K, rn MA<!ISTHATES. Miyini;. "It would liiivc liccii lii'tU'r il' you had told at first ;" (1) ov by sayiiiu;. " Vou liad lirtti'i- tell mctlu' truth. It will he hcttiT for you." (li ) Whiri' till' jiroHi'cutor askiMl the dcffiidiiiif for tin* moiii'y Avliich 1k' had taUi'ii ; and, hidorc it w^h j)rodui'i'd. .said ; •' I only want my moni'v. and if you i^ivc nu- that, you may jjjo to tho di'vil. if you |ilt'asf." upon which llic (U'fi'ndant took part of thr nioiu-y fri>m his pocket, and .said that was all he had left, ii majority of the judii;cs heUl that the evidiMici' was inailinissihle. Qi) A confession made with a view, and under a hop»'. of hein^ thereby jiermitti-d to tui'u (^lU'en's evidence, or of obtainiiii;; a pardon, or reward, has been held inadmissible. (4) And this is i'lcarly so where such hope is the reasonable ri'sult of a communi- cation from, or the conduct of a person in autliority. (5) Tlic inducement must refer to a temporal benefit. Hopes which are referable to a future state merely are not within the principle whii-h ren<lers a confession obtainiul by improper infliieni'e in- admissible, (t!) Tlius. where a prisoner, under fourti'cn years of a^t'. was arrested on a < harge of murder, and was spoken to by a man who Avas ])re.sent at the time of the arrest, as follows : •• Xow. kneel down ; I am goin.iT to ask you a very serious question, and I hope you will tell me thi' truth in tlie i)reseiK'e of the Almiifht}'." and tiie prisoner in consequence made a statement, it was held admis- r-ible. (T) It was. ill a ri'cent case, held by A. L. Smith, .1., that, although a jior.son who is suspecti'd of a crime may. before be is ehai'ged or is in custody, be asked what lie has to say in answer to or exjilan- ation of the matter, yet. after be is in custody, the police have no (1) H. V. Wall^ley, 6 C. & P. 175. (2) R. V. Fenneli, 50 L J. M. C. 126. (3) R. V. Jones, R. & R. 152; R. v. Parratt, 4 C. & P. 570. (4) R. V. Hall, 2 Leach, ri50. (5) R. V. (dllis, 11 Cox, 69. (ti) R. V. Uilham, R. it R., C. C. 18(). (7) R. V. Wild, 1 Mood. C. C. 452. EVIDKNCE liK coNl'FSSIiiN (i|t AH.M ISSION. 215 ri^lit Id iisk liim (iiicstinns. iiiwl itti !iiliiiis>i((ii or (•()iili's>i(>ii ulitaiii- cd in tliiit way is iMiiiliiiissiMc in cxidi'inc. (1 ) Wlicn lln' |iris(incr lias liccn ilniy caulidn*')! Iiy tin' nni;;isi ralf, in |inrsiianci' <if Ai'liclc .■)!•!. anylliinif >ai(l liy liim. tlicrciiiion, will liu adniissilik' in I'vidcncf a^'ainsl liini «>n Ids t rial. alilHMii;li, ut .sonic tinu' i)ivviniis to su(di caution hy tlic niau'ist rate, llici'c may liavc Keen a im-ommsc or threat held oiii to him to induce him to cont'ess. (:i) Bct'orc thu passinjj^ of tiio Canada Kvidence .\ct. iSli;!. it was held in the case of a |)i'isouer iudii'tcd for arson, that his de|io>itioii laki'U on oath at a previous eri((uiry. hefore the |''ire ('omndssion- iM's into the cause of the tire, was admi>^ilile a^ evidence ai^'ainst him. (:;) Hvil sec. 5. (d'tlu' Canada Kvidence .\ct. IS'.t."!. now ])rovides that •• Xo person shall he exeusi'd from an^werin^- any (|ucsii(in upon the n'round that the answer to su(di <|Uestion nuiy tend to crinun- ate him. etc. ; proxided. however, that no exidence >o o'ixcn >hall ho used or ri'ceivahlo in evideiiei' against su(di ]ier>on in any crim- inal pnurc'diuu; thcreal'ter instituted ag'ainst him. other than a pi'o.soculion for perjury in givini^- such evidence.' What a prisoner has iieeii overheard t<i say to another, or to himst'If is e(|uaily admi.ssihii' ; thougdi it is a species ol evidence to be acted on with nuudi caution, as heing lialde to he uiiiiiteiitiun- ally misre]ircsented hy tho witnesses. (4) Jn all cases, the whole confession should he proved ; i'ny it is a general rule, that the whole of the account whiih the |>ai'ty ii;ives of a transaction must he taken together; and his admission of a fact disadvantageous to himself shall not lie received without ri'- ceiving at the sanu> time his contomjioraneoiis ••sserlion of a fact favorahle to him. (5) DYING KECLAKATIONS. — "NVhcu t he (leat li of a person is the sub- ject of a criminal (diargc the (k'clavatioiis made hefore death hy the (1) R. V. Gavin, 15 (.'ox, 056. (2) R. V. Bate, 11 Cox, (i8(i. (3) R. V. Coote, L. K., 4 P. C, 5i>» ; 42 L. J. P. C-, 45. (4) R. V. Simmons, 6 C. & P., 540. (5) Taunt, 245 ; Queen's Case, 2 B & B., 294. •Jh; l'l(A( rii'AI, (JIIDK Ti> MAillSTIIAIKS. (l(Ti;|-.ci| JHTXIII inliccnil ML,'' I ll<' Cllllsi' llllll ci I'd! lllsl i| IICI'N 1)1' llli' ili'iii li ii I'f n(|mi->Mlili' ill r\ idciicc Inr (ir {itfiiiir-il llu' iiciiiscil, il' llic (|(ilai;il inn wnr iiiadi' liy lln' iIitchsciI wiili n lull (■l)||^<•i(lllsll(■^s mill lii'lii'l'. williniil liii|ii'. oT ti|i|irii:i('liiii;^ ilc'il II. (I) i'lii' i|\iiii^ ilnhi lii I iiiiiN III' ;i I'rh) (leaf, were held tu lie ^(mm| (U'i (Icinc jiLiiiiii^l a |iri'Miii iiidiiti'il t'nr assisliiij^ I he di'ci'aHcd in Ids hi'h iiiiirdir . and I in' niaincil \ id' I lie jnilffcs were id' ii|iiiii(in I hat IImn i-\idi-nii- Wnllld cp|' il>rlr III' Mllliciclll to cnlivirl. a II lliilll^ll llii' |i-lniinn\ (d' I 111' a((iini|iliir. ir li\ in;^'. wniild iml . inilfss riin'olidi'- add li\ iillnr c\ idciMi'. ( 'J I 'I'liis caM' i> iiu iidrini;! nii'iil ul'llic /ii-iirrai nili- llia( a iiiaii-^ nwii roii l'r--iiiiii is. as^indi. im cvidcnrc a^■aillst hi-. ai-i'uiii|ilii !• ; I'nr an arcuni |iIht is aiiiiiissililc as a inluens ayain-'l lii-- I'rllnws. and a d vin^' dcrlaral inn niadr liv a jicrsnn who, il iili\f wiMild \>r adiiiiN-'ildi' its a wilm'^s. i> adidssililc as i'\ idrni-c \S iicli' iIm' di'alll id' llir dcirascd is I lir snliircl id' I lir rliar^i'. and llii' rail'-i' id' lln- dcalii lln' --illpU'rl nl'llir 1 1_\ i li;^- drrla ra I h m . {'.',) I'lir I 111' in id I »\ iiin I >irla I'al imi. -^n- |i I | J dntc. liWl. 10% i4l<'ll«M' t'iH' ilM> lll'I't'lKM'. Alli'l I III' |il'i> ci'idiii^'^ ri'.|niiiil li\ --riliiin ;V.ll an' iiiiii|p|i'liil .llir acriiscd shall 111' a-ki'd i I III' w i'-lii'- I II lall anv \s il iir-^>rs. J. K\i'i'\ w il iii'ss callfd li\ I 111- aiTiisi'd. w lii( li'sl ilii"^ In an\ lail I'i'lt'V aiil In I lie I'iisi' hall 111 hi'ai'd. and his di'|Misiliiiii shall hr lakin in I 111' same inaiini'i' as I he ih'|insilinnf< oi' the witiicssfs lni- t lu' |)i'n sciiil inn. I ' lull' I' this A I'l iili- I 111' lliaL;'isl rale is nhli^'cd In laUr. al I ln' |)l'r liniinary in\ i "^1 i|:;al inn llir di'jinsil inns id' any wiliit'HHCM thai lln- |il'isn|i('l' nia \ U l-'h In i'\aillilli' as well as I Imsr id' I he W il ni'sscs In I' 1 lir [il'iisirlll inn This. hnwi'Ni'r, dill'-- mil anllmi'i/i' ihr nia^^isl ralr In 1 1'\ ihi' i'ii^>«' . iini' dnrs il is'wr I lii' di'triidiiiil I he i'ii;'lil. I'm' in-'laiiri', in a |H'ii^('rlll imi Inl' |illlili^ilil|i;- a lilii'l. In |)l'n\i', al I llf prcli lni liai'V (I I Kcrr'M Mnu AiIm, •..'^•, Il v. .Idiiknin, II dix, '..'51); It. \. (mmIiI.uiI, IT) Cox, 7; U. V. Kiiiilli, liKux, r;ii; K. v. Mi'Mttlioii, IHOiit,. K. TiOL' ; li. v. Mil (•hell, 17 Cox.WA. (•_•) II. V. Twicklur, 1 Kahl, I'. C '.M. , ' ' Ci) Anil. ( 'I. ri. .V I'A. -Jl I'M. 27-1. K\IIiI':M'K I'lilt INK DKI'KM K. aw <'Mi| 111 ry. I lif I nil li ol' 1 ln' imil Icr fliur;;*'<l un ii lilu'l ; Inr il Iimm liccii liclil ill I'limliiml, >iin't' I 111' icriiiiliiin', Ihi'i'c. nl' I lie ri^lil lo ciili wil lUiHSI'S fur I lie ilcl'clKC ill :i |M )| ice ('(III I'l i M\'i'hl i;^j|| joll, I Iml . j||| ||il||j[r|| wlicrr I lie cliiiriif wiiMlliiil III' iiiMrKiuiisly /(((/*!/.s////('/ ;i ili'l'iiiiiiilory lilirl KN'nWI.Nd IT 'I'M III''. lAI.SK, I lie lllilt;'i^l fill <• ll(t(l jll l'iN(|icl inll |i) I'ccciv'c i'\ idt'licf 1)1' ihc Inilll ol' I 111' iiiicl. M) UN In lli'u;illi\r I lin ull<'i;':il iiiii lliiil I III' iIi'Ii'IhIiiiiI knkw il In lir I'lilst'. lie liiiil iiid siii'li juii>iliil inn w lii'i'i' till' clijii'L!.'!' ^^il'^ lli.it nl' >iiii|ily iiuilii'iniisly yulilmhimj n lirriiiiiiilnry liiifl, (|^ I<i\|»4'4li<'ll4'y 4>r 4'illlillK' %V i<ll4'^iN«'H i\*V I II 4' Il4'- iVll4*4>. A- In llir i'\ |ii'(|irli(y of raililii;- wi I l|i'>.M'.s inl' I he i|r IciHc, ill I ill' |iri'liiiiiiiiiry riii|uiry. Iliis uill t^i-i'iilly (|i-|irii(| ii|inii I 111' mil II I'l' n I I 111- ruse I'sliililislirij liy t lie | p I'nsccu I inl i iilid I lie |M'nli\ Illilc li'Mlll 111' llir rlli|llll'\. Il llirrilM' I'Sl lllilisllii I ill I In rjiif^i' ul' llll' CSiilcHir I'nl' I lif | il'nsccll I in|| is Midi lllill ;|||\ jirnnl' In lii< ili|i|l|i'i'i| nil llir |i!il'l nlllli' ill'rusrij will iilll\ illlinlllil ill IlinMl, In ji inllllirl 111' ('\ jijcliri'. il W i 1 1 linl I ir ilil V isil lilr In liiilkr ll'-'i' nl il ill lIllN Mliitji', cilice, illl linillill llll' |ilr|Mi|ii|iTii||(i' Wnlllij. j I' |||(' IK Tllscil s wil ll(•,ss(■^ Wrrr rXillili lli'i 1 . Iir ill Ilis I'ilVnr, ||ic |llhliri' Wiilllil. Ill ill! |irnliiiliil||y , iniillllil I'nr Iriill. il liiillL;' lin |iiil'l n|' his llllly III ililrnililli' lis In llll' ;;l|i|| i)|' i 1 1 1 inccl ll'c n I' i| |il||'lN' llinlrl' Hllcli li rcllMlsl iiliccs, 'I'lirrr illr, linW cV c r. Iiliili\ I'ilsi'K nl liruilll l<(cie u,'iiill w liicli I III' jii'i'iiMil iiiiiy. Iiy I'lillin^ w it iirssi'ii. Iir niiilili'd MO III i'\|)lllill lis In I'li'iir ll|i ill nlll'C llll' illl|illlill inn t|i|'jiiiis| liiiii 'I'lllls, |l{inli il cliiil'uc ol' llicl'l. il niil\ 111- lllill till' only |irnnr nl' ^(llill lliiilillsj liilil is Ills |inHHCHHillll nl I III' slojcii |i|n|M'|'l\ ; i|||{| il iiiiiy liii|i|M'ii lllill he is in a silimtinii In .-imw liy ImmIijv ri'^incliilili- ti--'ruiinll\ lllill 111' liri'lllili' pnsscssril ol llu' |)rn|i('rty ill il licll'i'i'llv lilir ilinl li'HH'st nilllilli'l' Imliril. in iill tlnsc ciisi's. \\ lirrc llid ri'iiiiiiuilily 111 till' jiiii'ly iiccnscil itsIs iiii'ii'iy ii|inii tlir |ii'rsiiiii)i liiill nl' hiw w liiili I lie iH't'llHi'il is II I ill' I o <'\ |iiiilli liy f\ ii Ic'IH r, silrji rviili'iH'i' iiiiiy 111' iiililiK'i'il willi gi I't'iisonalilr rx|M'<'liilioii of siif I'CKh. 'I'll!' i|lli'sl|o|i lo 111' llsKi'il. llinlrr >nrll li I'rII lllsl illlii's, lii'lori^ iiiiiliK'iii^j; cviiifiK-f, slioiilil lie Will I 111' |ii'iii|ii('lioii ol llll' nviilciirr III' riliist likely III I'csiiil ill ihc liisrlnii'^c nf (lie |trisnlii'i' 'i* If' it will. I lien il will lie jinlieioiiN III uH'ci- il ; hill il' such ii result is nut ;l) |{. V. Ciiriloii,.'. ii H. D. I ; 111 I.. .1. M. (;. I. 218' PUACTIfAI, (iirnE TO MA(fISTHATES. likely, then its prdductidii at liio |nrliiiiiiiavv riHiuiry will not he ailvistible. It is soim'tiini's iinaii'iiiod that, if the aceused has exciilpatory evideiiee. and tails to olVer it at the prelijniiiary eiii|iiiry iieliu-e the magistrate, adxaiitaye may he taUeii of tlie oiuission on his after- wanls iirodueiiig it on his trial. iJiit K-ariied judges have ot'teii n'|>i'eheiided ohservatioiis made, upoii this grciiiutl. hy iiroseeuliiig eoiiusel. I'^or instance, in a ease in whiidi the |irison<.'r's eounsi'l. after addressing the Jury. oliser\ed that he should call witnesses to ])i'o\-c an alibi ; that thesi' witnesses were not examineil before the eommitting magistrate, and that perhaps some observation might be maiU' on that account, but that the witnesses had gone to the preliminary en(|uiry bet'ore t he magistrate and. on the advice of t hi' |»risoner'.s attorney, were not called. — Pollo(d\. ('. 15., said that in his opinion no siudi observation should be made a> to witnesses not iii'ing called foi' a jirisoner ^vhen being examined before the magis- trate, and if made il would be \<-yy improper. When', at the preliminary emiuiry. one oi- nn)re witnesses s[ioke of the accused as the pers(ui by wlioni the crime imiuired into was committeil. it would be the duly of the magi.-trate to conimil. ami it would bi^ (|uiti' useless to call witiicsscNon the part ol' the prisoner eil her to ]U'ove an a/zii' or anything else m his tavor. It woubl be useless ex|K'nse to call them, at (inec. to prove the same t hing as could be ]u'o\cil at the trial, and a thing whiidi no discreet attorney (Might to ad\ isf his client to <|o. This, the learned Judge s;i id. had always been his opinion, and thcrcfoi'e he ue\H'r allowed >U(di ob>ervations to lie made. (1) It will -ometinu's happen, where a jiai'ty is charged with theft. an<l t he only i'\idcnce against him is that ot' recent po.ssessicm ol' the stolen article, i hat he defends himself by asseHing tliat he received the properly in (piestion from a particular |M'vson w bom he names, it Mudi pei-son so named is procurable, and there is nothing to show that the statement of the pri-oncr is an utter liibricalion. he (the person namc<i by I he prisoner) slmulil be sent for and examined as to i he alleged fact. I'pon this point, several judgi's have expressed a strong ojtinitui. in one case, the prisoner was indicted for stealiuij; a piece of wood, the projieriy of a persnn (1) 1!. V. Clark, o Cox, C. ('• l'3u. EVIDENCE K(iH THE DEFENCE. lil!) iiiimod Herman, and it aiipcaivd from the ovidiMu-c t'ortlic i>rosc- cution that on tlie jiioco of wood boing found \)y a ])olici'man in tho prisonev's shop. al)out live days after Ilei-man liad lost jtosses- sion of it, the ]»risoner stated that he had l)ouglit it from a i)er.s(m named Nash, who lived ahout two miles otf. Xash was not jiro- duced as a witness for the proseention. and the prisonei- did not eall any witnesst's. Hiiroii .Mderson, in sumnunii' up. said : •■ in cases of this nature yon may take it as a general principle, that where a man in whose jiossession stolen property is found given a reasonahk' account of how he came liy it. as hy stating the name f)f the person from whom he rei't'ived it. antl who is known to he a real persoji. it is iiu'umlient on tl«e [irosecution to show that that account is false: iiut if the account given liy the jiri- soner In' uni"east)nahle or inqirohahle on the face of it. the o/ia,s of proving that it is ti'ue lies on him. Supposi'. for iiisiMiicc. a person were to charge me with stealing his watch, and i wi're to say I hought it from a |iarticulai' tradesman, whom 1 name, that is prima facie a reasonalile account, and 1 ought not to lie convict- ed, unless it is shown that that account is a fal.se one." ( 1) This ruling was conlirmed in the case of J{. v. Hughes. (2) .\nd.in a more recent case. TiOrd J)ennnin. C.J., a]i[)roved >:f it. and expressly laid ilowu his view, of tlu' duties of justices in sucdi a case, in these words. — • J tjuite agree Avith the case of K. v. Crow- hurst. It was nuMitioneil to me j>y jiaron Alder.son. at the time when it occurri'd. If a person in whose ]iossession stolen proj)erty is found give a reasonahle account ot' how he came liy it. ami makes reference to some known ])erson as tlie pi'rson from w honi he re- ceived it. the magistrate should send for that jierson and e.xanuue, him; as it may he that iiis statement nuiy entirely exoiu-rate the accused person, and put an cud lo the charge.'' (;>) Tills rule, of course, will apply only to the case of a reference not inconsistent with tlie other facts of the cjise ; for. if t he pris- oner himselt' ha\e given \ arioiis accounts (d' iiow lie came possessed of tiie property. (I) or if tliere are in the case circumstances wliicli (1) K. v. Crowlnirst, 1 C. I'c K. 370. (2) R. v. IlnLdie.s, 1 Cox, C. C- 170. (3) H. V. Smith, L' C. & K. 107. (4) H. V. Deiiloy. 2 C. itK. 81S. 220 PUACTICAL GUIDE TH MAGISTRATBS. icinlci' till' jirisom'j's at'count unvoasonable or its truth improbable, t!u' burden tboii of ])ro(lucing tbi' party referred to will be cast U)><in tlu- accused. (1) >>!M. — l>iM4'liai'K'«' of A«*«*iin<m1. m lioii ii4» Niifli<'i<'iit. 4'a.so. — When all the wituosscs on the jiart of tlic ])rosccuf ion and tiic accused have been heard. tbe justice shall, if upon the whole of the evidence he is of o]iinion that no sutficient case is made out to ])ut tlie accusi'd u])()n his trial, discharge liini : and in such case any recoi;-nizances taken in respect of the idiarn'c shall itecome void, unless some person is bound over to ])rosecute under the provisions ne.Kt hereinafter contained. When witnesses are ])roduced and examined on tbe jiart of the prisoner, at tlu' preliminary investigation, the pro])er course to be followed by tbe magistrate seems to be this. If the prisoner's witnesses are believed, and tlieir evidence, without actually contra- dicting the testimony of tbe Avituesses for tbe proseciftion, tends merely to explain Ibe fads proved in support of tbe charge, and to thus show the prisoner's innocence, they will have nnule out on lu'half <if tbe accused a defence whi(di woidd renib-r any further pi'oceedings unnecessary, liut. if the prisoners witnesses contradict those for the prosecution, in nniterial points, tlu' case would then be a itrojx'r one tr be sent to a Jury to ascei-ttiin and decide whi(di of the two conflicting statements is tbe truth. It sliould not be supposed that, because the bearing iiefore the justice is only preliminary, and not (d' a final nature, .slight evi- dence alone will be suttieient to warrant a committal for trial. Justices have a right, in tbe pvlirainary investigation of an in- dictable oit'enco. to expect, and ought to insist upon baving the best evidence that exists in file case : and although in a ]n'elimin- ary en(|uiry if is not for them to balaiue tbe evidence, yet such evidence as is produced ought to W- of tbe same nature and quality as that which would be admitted at tbe trial of the accused. All tbe evidence, therefore, that would be re(juired to support the (duirgi' u])on tbe trial should be carefully gathered togelber for use u]ion tbe prelimiiuiry examinatiiui. (I ) R. V. Harmer, 2 Cox, C. O. 487 ; R. v. Wilson, 2 Dears, C. C. 167. COMMITTAL FOH TRIAL . 221 •>1I»>. — l*i*ow<>4'iitoi* .Hlo«t«'«l to bt' Ifioiiud Ov«>r to liidi««t.— If tlu' justico discharges tlie accused, and the per- son iirctiM'i'iniJc 1 lu' charii,'c (li'siivs to prefer an in(iictment respect- ing tlie said cliai'ye. he may require the justice to liind him over to prefer and pntsecute such an indictment, and tliereupon the justice slijill tal<e liis i-ecognizauce to prefer antl ])rosecute an iiidictnieiit a^'aiiist tlie accused iiefore the court liv wliich sucli accused would he tried if such justice had coininitted him. and the justice shall deal with the recognizance, information and depositions in the >ame way as if he had ((uumitted the accused tor trial. 2. Such recognizance may lie in the b^orm U in sciiBnri,EO.\F,. (1) or to the like effect. 3. If tlie |)rosocut()r so bound over at his own request does not prefer and |)rosccute such an indictment, or if the grand juiy do not tind a trui' liill. or if the accused is not convicted u])on tlie in- dictment so jireh'rred. the prosi'cutor shall, if tlu' court so direct, ])ay to the accused person his costs, including tlie costs of his ap]iearauce on the preliminary inquiry. 4. The court before which the indictment is to be tried or a judge thereof may in its or his discretion order that the i»rosec\itor shall not be permitted to prefer any such indictment until be has given siu'Ui'ity for such costs to the satisfaction of siudi court or judge. f>!N>.— foililllittul l4»l* Trial.— if a justice holding a preliminary im]uiry thinks that the evidence is sutticieut to jmt tlie accused on his trial, he shall commit liim for trial by a warrant of commitment, which may be in the kor.m \' in sciiedi'LK one, (2) or to the like effect. SOT* — C'opiOM oi*l>«'|»ONitioiiN. — Kvery one who Inisbeen commilted for trial, whether he is bailed or not. nniy be entitled at anytime before the trial to have copies of the depositions, and of his own statement, if any. from the officer who has custody thi'reof, on ])aynn'nt of a reasonable sum not I'xceeding five cents for i-ach folio ot' one hundred words. (1) For Form V, see p. -SS, post. (2) I'or Form V, lee p. 23it, poM. 222 I'llACTICAL (irillE 'I'll MAdlSTItATKS. 51»H. -ll«'«*o>{iii*aii<M' <o l*r»M4'4*iil4' 4»r tflvo K* i- «|4'II4*«'. — VVIhmi iuiy (iiic is coiiuMitlffl lor I rial 1 lie just ice liiiltliiiii,' tlu! prcliiniiiiiry iiKiiiiry iiiiiy ImihI over, to |>r()scciitc. some [ktsoii willinji; Ut lu' so IkiuikI, and liiml ovur i-vi-ry wiliu'ss uliosc (li'|iosi tion lias liiHMi taken, and whose evidenee in liis opinion is nialei'iai. to fjive evidence at tlu' eonri liel'oi'e wiiieli the aeeiised i> to hi- indi<'ted. \i. Kveryrceoi^nizaiiee so entered into shall specify the name and surname of till' |ierson eiiti'riiin' into it. his occupation oi- piof'ssioii if any. tlu' place •)!' his I'esidence ami I he name ami niimlier, if any, ofuny street in which it may he. and whcihei' he is owner ■>!• ten ant thereof or a lodi^er thei'ein. i :{. Such recoifni/.aiice may he either at the foot of the depohilion or separate therefrom, and may he in tlii' J'on.M W, \ or ^' in scme Dil.K (»NK of the ("ode. (1) or to the liUe etfect.and shall he acknow ledo'eil hy the per.son eiiteriiif^ into the saiin'. and he siihscrihed hy tlu' iusti<'i! oi- one of the Justices hefore whom it is ackiiowledu'ed. •I. I-Acrv sn( h recoirni/.ance shall hin<l I he pcr.'-oii cnteriiiif into it Id prosecute, or ,i;ive evidence, (hoth or eit her as the case may he), hidore the court hy which the accused shall he tried. 5. All siitdi recoijnizances and all otln'i' recogui/ances taken iimler tlie ('o(h' shall he liahle to he estreatetl in the Hanu^ inaimer as any fui'fcited recoMiii/.aiH'e to apjicar is hy law liahle to he estreateil hy ihe court hefore whi( h the priiici|ial party ther<-to was hound to ai.i'ear. (1. Whenever any person is hound hy recognizance to givi! evi deuce hefore a Justice of the |ieace. or any criminal court, in res|)(^ct of any otVence under the ( 'ode. any Justice of the peace, if he see^ tit. upon information I icing niadi' in writing.? and on oat h. t hat micIi person is ahout to ahscond, or has ahsconded. may issue hi> warrant for the arn'st of such person: and if su(di per^im is arrested any iuslice ol' the peace. Upon heing satisfied that the cuds ot' justic wouhl otherwihc he defeated, may commit such pel.■^ou to prison until" the time at whi(di he is liound hy siiidi re<ognizaiicc to give eviileiice. uule.ss ill the meantime he produces sullicieiil Mirt'ties , (1) For Foruis W, X and Y. m<m' pp. '-'4(i, nnd '-M1,;>,,w, UECddNlZANCK I'll I'llusKCITK (Ht IIIVK KVIKKNCK. -li.'J 1)Ut iiiiy |iccs()ii so aiTcstcil sliiill lie chtitlfil (III (Icim.'mkI to rccc'ivn ii cojiy nf 1 he iiil'uniiiitiiiii u|)(iii wliicli tliu wiin'Mil lor liis arri'st was issiiiMl. I r I lie wit iios iniiniiillcd lor I riiil clfcls :i s|K'C(|y 1 im;iI iiinifr I Ihs jirovisioiis ol I'll It I/I \'. oT I lie ( 'oiif, rcialini;- lo s|)c('(l\ t rials of in - <liclal)l(' ollciiccs, any rfcoifiii/.aiici' taken iinflcr tlic alio\t' ai'liclc^ r»!(S, \\)v liindini;' a |M'osi'cMlor or a witness will lie olilii^atorx' on eaeh peison liound lliei'eliy. as to all tllini;s lliel'ein mentioned with ret'ci'enee to sn(di speedy trial, as if sncdi reeonnizanee InnI lieen oi'i.H'inally entei'ed into I'oi' tiiedoini:; of sneli tliinii,'s with lud'ereiu'e to sncli speedy trial; prosideij. iiowexei'. that at least forty eiij lit hours' nofu'c. shall he i;i\'eii. either personallv or hy h'axini;' the same at the place of residence of the persons honnd. to appear lieliire the jndi;'e at tlu' place where Mieli speedy trial is to he hail. (Codi'. .\rt. 77'.>. jxist.) •SSm. %%'illl4>N.S ICclllKillU' <<» l»4' It4»llll4l 4l%«'r.-- Aii\' witness who refuses to enter into or aiduiowleili^e any sindi recognizance as aliiresaiil may hecommittcil hy the insiice holding' llie iminiry by a warrant in the roiiM Z in sciiKiiii.i.; onk of llie <!()ile, (l) or to the lik<' ellect. to the pi'ison for the jdace where tlic trial is to he had. there to he kept until alter the trial, or until the witiie-s enters into sncii a rccoi^ni/.ance as afoi'esaid, liefore a ^justice of the peace iiaxiui;' jurisdict ion in the place where till! |MMson is situated ; l'ro\ided that, if tiie accused is afterwards disclwiriicd. any ju>ti(e havini;- snidi jurisdiction may onier any sucli witness to lie discharni'd liy an oi'der wliieii may he in the i'okm A A in the s.M n sc ukimlk. (2 ) or to t lie like etlect. <»4IO. TraiiNiiiiiHMioii nV IIo4'Iiiii«'iiIk. Tin l(dlowiu<; <iocuments >hall. as soon as uniy he alter tiie committal id' liu' accused, he transmitted totiu' clei'k or other ju'iijicr ojlicer of the court hy w iiich the accused is to he tried, that is to say. the infoi'- nuttion. if an\ . the depositions ^d■ the witnesses, llie exliihils tlioi'c- to, the statement of the accused, and all recoi;ui/,ances enfereil into, and also any depositions taken hefore a eorom-r if any sueli huvo heeu sent tot he just ice. t (1) For Form Z, w«o p. '_'ll, putt. (2) For Form AA.Heop. 'lA'i^poH. -24 H.lLCi I'KACTICAL (JL'IDK TO MAUISTKATBS: 2. Whon any order changing tlie place ol' trial is made, the per- son obtaining it shall serve it, or an office copy of it. upon the person then in possession of the said documents, who shall tliere- upon transmit the indictment, if found, to the officer of llie court before which the trial is (o take place. Section 12 ol' the North West Territories Act (54-55 Vict., c. 22) directs that every justice of the peace or other magistrate holding a )»reliminary investigation into any criminal offence, whicli may not be tried under the provisions of '• The Summary Convictions Act," shall, immediately after the conclusion of such investigation, trans- mit, to the clerk of the Court for the judicial district in which the charge was made, all informations, depositions, recognizances, and papers connected with such charge, and that the clerk of the Court shall notify the judge thereof. <»OI. — Kill*' aw to Bail. — AVhen any person appears before any justice charged with an indictable otfence punishable by im- prisonment for more than five years. — other than treason or an otfence ])unishable with death, or an offence under Part IV of the Code, (1) — and the evidence adduced is, in the opinion of such jus- tice, sufficient to put the accused on his trial, but does not furnish such a strong presumption of guilt as to warrant his committal for trial, the justice jointly with some other justice, may admit the accused to bail upon his procuring and producing such suret}' or sureties as, in the oitinion of the tivo justices. yy\\\ be sufficient to insure his appearance at the time and ]>lace when and where he ought to be tried for the otfence ; and thereupon the two justices shall take the recogni^iinces of the accused and his sureties, conditioned for his appearance at the time and jiiace of trial, and that he will then surrender and ta're his trial and not depart the court without leave ; and. in any case in which the offence committed or suspected to have been committed is an offence ])unishal)le by impi-isonment for a term less than five years, any one justice, before whom the accused appears, may admit to bail in manner aforesaid ; and siub justice or justices ma}', in his or their discretion, require such bail to jus- tify upon oath as to their sufficiency, which oath the said justice or (1) Part IV of the ("ode, deals with Treason and other offences against tfie Queen's authority and person. RULE AS T(t BAIL. 226 justiceH miiy iulminisUT ; iind in (lotiiult ol' such person procuring Kufficient bail, such justice or Justices may commit him to prison, tliere to be k^pt until delivered according to law. 2. The recognizance mentioned in this section shall be in the form Bli in SCIIBDLLE ONE. (1) In the case of a prisoner charged with an indictable otl'enct- pun- ishable by more than live years imprisonment. — other than treason or an otlence punishable with death, or any ott'ence against Part IV of the Code — this Article gives to two justices, or. (by virtue of Ar- ticle 54] of the (!ode, ante,) to a judge of sessions, police magis- trate, recordei", or other functionary vested, by that Article, with the powers of two Justices, a discretionary- power to admit him to bail ; and in the case of a prisoner charged with an ott'ence pun- ishable by less than Hve years imprisonment, he may be adniitttid to bail by one Justice. In deciding whether the accused should or should not be ad- mitted to bail it should be borne in mind that, the purpose of a committal to jirison before trial is to ensure the appearance of the accused at the time and place when and where he is to be tried ; and justices should consider the circumstances of each case, with this object onl}' in view. As this duty involves an enquiry in which discretion must be exercised, no general rule can be laid down. Usually, however, it will be sufficient for the justices to look at the nature and magnitude of the charge, the position in life of the accused, the cogency of the evidence against him. and the probable severity of the punishment likely to follow a conviction : and, if they consider it probable that the accused would sooner that he and his sureties should forfeit a sum of money than run the risl« of a trial and conviclirin and the sentence likely to follow, they should rvjfuse to a<lmit the accused to bail. The amount of the recognizance is entirely in the justice's dis- cretion, and should depend upon the nature of the charge and the position of the i)arties. .... A magistrate must not. however, in a case in which the accused is entitled to be admitted to bail, require excessive bail, so as in (1) For Form BB, .soe p. 243, post. 22(! I'KACTICAI, (iUIDE Tn MAdlSTKATES. cltluM to ainoiint lo a dciiial of bail ; or he may ruiulov lumsolf liable to an action at tlu' suit of (he ])('rsoii wrongfully imprisoned, or cM'n to a criniinal proscculion. (1) Stili.it lias been iicld tliat the power ol.' a inayislrate to aL'('e|)t or refuse iiail.even in cases where the accused has a right to be hailed. is a judicial function, and that an action will not lie against him for refusing to take bail in such cases, in theabsenceof jjroof of express malii-e. even thoui;h the sureties tendered are found suiHcicnt. (2) For (lie purpose of determining the sutticiency of the jiersons tendered as sureties, the justice may require their names to be given to the ]trosecutor. some time previousl3'. say 24 or 4H liours. and lie may 'administer to the |)ersous tendered an oath •• to nuilce true answer to all such (puvstions as may be 'demanded of theni" ; and he may then put to them the usual qtu'stions as to their means, property and liabilities and whether or not they are solvent, and so on : but the justice ought not to interfere in any way to dis(|uiet them from becoming bimnd as bail : (H) nor can he legally enquire into the jiensonal eharaoter or political opinions of the per- sons ottered as bail. His iluty is restricted to an enquiry into tlie sufliciency of the property of the sureties to meet the recogniz- ance. (4) In a case which came before .Martin B.. that learned judge is reported to have stated his opinion to be that if the justice is satis- fied of the solvency of the persons tendered as bail, he is not justi- fied in rejecting them on account of any alleged objections to their moral character, or from the fact of their being indemnitied by tlie defendant. (5) ,: ^ ' • «0!J. Bail .liter Coiiiiiiittul.— In case of any ortence other than treason or an ott'ence punishable with death, or an ott'euce under Part IV. of the Code, where the accused has been finally committed as herein ])rovided. any judge of any superior or (1) R. V. Badger, 12 L. J. M. C. (W ; 4 Ad. & T-:. 4(>8; R. v. Tracey, 15 L. J. M. C 145. (2) Linford v. Fitzroy, 18 L. J. M. C. 108; 13 Q. B. 240. (3) K. V. Saunders, 2 Cox, C. C. 240. (4) R. V. Badger, mpra. (5) R. v. Broome, 18 L. T. 19. llAir, AKTKK ro.MMrTTAI,. ZSl comity ctiiirl. liaviiin' jurisdiftiiin in tlic county or district witliin the limits of wliicli tlio aocusotl is contiiicd. may, in his discivtion. on a|)|)iii'ation made to him for llnit |)nri»osc. order the accused to he admilti'il to liail on I'nterini^ into recoynizance with siitlicii'iit surotios iiefore two Justici's. in smdi amount as tiie Judi:;c directs, and thei'cupon the Justices shall issue a warrant of deliverance as hereinafter )irovided. and shall attaidi thereto the order of the Judge dii-eclini;' the admitting of the accused to hail. 2. Su(di warrant of deliverance shall he in the form ('( ' in SCHKDUI.E ONE. (1) . A <»OJfi. Iliiil hy Nii|>4'i*ioi* Court. — Xo Judge of a county court or Justices shall admit any |»i'rson to hail accused of treason or an otVence punishahle with death, or an otlencc under I'ai't I \^ of the Code, nor shall any such j)erson he ailmitti'd to hail. exce])t hy order of a Sui»erior Court of Criminal Jurisdiction lor the province in whicdi the accused stands committecl, oi- of one of the Judges thereof, or. in the provinci' ol' (^uehec. hy order of a Judge oi' the (Joui't of (^uei'u's JJencdi or Superioi- Court. «04. A|i|»li<«atioii for Kail Al'tor <'omiiiittal. — When any [K'rson has heen committed for trial l>y any Justice, the jjrisoner. his counsel, solicitor or agent may notify the commit- ting Justice, (hat lie will, us soon as c(mnsel (-an be heard, move be-, fore a Superior Court of the province in which suidi ])erson stands committed, or one of the Judges thereof, or the Judge oi'tlie county court, if it is intended to apply to sucdi Judge, uniler secti..:; (i02, for an order to tlie Justice to admit such prisoner to bail, — vhere- upon such committing Justice shall, as soon as nniy be, transmit to the Crown, or the chief clerk of the court, or the clerk of the county court, or othei- propi'r otticer. as the case may be, endorsed under his iiand and seal, a certitied co))y of all informations, examinations and other evidence touching the oflence wherewitli tlie ])i-isoner has been charged, together with a copy of the war- rant of conimilment, and the packet containing the same shall be handed to the ))erson applying therefor, for transmission, and it shall be certitied on the outside thereof to contain the information concerning the case. (1 ) I or Form CC, see p. 244, post. 228 I'RArTioAL (irriiE to maoistuates. 2. Upon such iipplicutiou to any such court or judge the sumo order concerning tlie prisoner being hailed or continued in custody shiill he luiido as it' th<' prisoner was hrouglit uj* upon a habeas corpus. 3. If any justice neglects or offends in anything contrary to tlie true intent and meaning of any of the j)rovision8 of this section, the court to whose otticer any such examiinvtion. information, evidence. i)aiiment or recognizance ouglit to have been delivered, shall, upon examination and proof of the otl'ence, in a summary manner, impose such liiu^ upon every such justice as the court thinks fit. 605. Warrant of llt'livcrant*«'. — Whenever an^- jus- tice or justices admit to bail any person who is then in any prison charged with the offence for which he is so admitted to l»aii, sucli justice or justices siiali send to or cause to be lodged with the keeper of such prison, a warrant of deliverance under his or their hands and seals requiring the said keeper to discharge the person so admitted to bail if he is detained for no other offence, and upon such warrant of deliverance being delivered to or lodged with such keeper, he shall forthwith oljey the same. (>04>. Warrant tor ^lrr«'Nt 4»1' Bail<'«l l*<'rN4»n About to AI>N('ond. — Whenever a person charged with any offence has been bailed in manner aforesaid, it shall be lawful for any justice, if he sees tit, upon the ap))lication of the surety or of either of the sureties of such person, and upon information being made in writing and on oath by such surety, or by some ])er.son on his behalf that there is reason to believe that the person so bailed is about to abscond for the purpose of evading justice, to i.ssue his warrant foi' the arrest of the jterson so bailed, and afterwards, upon being .satisfied that the ends of justice would otherwise be defeated, to commit such pei-son wlien so arrested to gaol until his trial, or until lu' produces another sufficient surety or other suf- ficient sureties, as the case may be, in like manner as before. For Forms of Information of Sukety. and of Warrant, and Commitment thereon, see "Additional Forms 'after the general forms, at the end of this chapter, (pp. 247-250, ^os<.) KoiiMS. . 229 007* l>ollv«'ry ol AcriiN4>«l in PriNOii. — The con- Htablo or any of the coiiHtiiblos, or otlu'r |K)rHoii to whom any war- rant ol'commitnuwil autliorizi'd by the (!riininnl Codo or any other aot or hiw is din^ctod, Hhall coiivy the uct'UHed person therein named or (Uiseribeil to the gaol or other priso?! mentioned in such warrant, and there ileliver him. togetlier with the warrant, to the keeper of Hueli gaol or jtrison, who HJiall thereupon give the eonHtal)le or otiier person delivering th(^ |)i"isoner into his custody, a receipt for the prisoner, setting forth the state and condition of the prisoner when (U^livered into his custody. 2. Such receipt sbull be in the fokm DI) in scHEDur-E one. (1) As to Recognizances generally, and remedies thereon, when for- feited, see Chapter XIV, yos^ FORMS UNJ)K1{ PART XLV OF THE CO DM K— {Section 580.) SU.M.MO.NS TO A WITNESS. (Janada, Province of County of 1 To K. F., of , {labourer) • . Whereas information has been laid^before the undersigned , a justice of the peace in and for the said county of , that A. B. (&c., as in the summons or warrant against the accused), and it lias l)een made to ap[)ear to me upon {oath), that you are likely to give material evidence foi- {the prosecution) . ; These arc therefore to require you to be and to a[»pear before me,.on next, at o'clock in the {fore) nooji. at . or before such other justice or justices of tlie peace of the same county of .^as shall then be there, to testify what you know ( 1 ) I'^or Form DD, see p. 245, poM. 280 I'llArTrCAI. guide to MACir.STRATKS. cdiK^'iMiiiiy tlu' siiiil fluirgc so iiiiuli' against tlu- saiil A. U. as aibiv- said. llfi'ciii tail not. (liven nndt'i' my hand and seal, lliis (l;i\' (d' ill t lie year , at ■ , in tlic county at'oi'i'said. .1. S.. [SEAI,.] ./. P.. {Na7ne of county) \..—{Sedim r),s2.) WARRANT WHEN A WITNESS HAS NOT OHEVI-W) THE Sl.MMONS. ("a- 'da. 1 I'rovinci' o, , /• (.'(umty of ,3 'I'o all or any (d' tlie ••onstalik's and oMu'V peace officers in tlu' said county of Wlieivas infornnition having hecn laid before . a Justice of the peace, in and for the said county of , that A. B. {&c., as in tliesuvxmonn) ; and it having Ixrcn made to appear to (vie) ujion oath tliat E. V. of . (labourer), was likel}- to give material (nddence for (the prosecution). (/) duly issued (my) sum- mons to the said E. l\. requiring him to bo and appear before (me) on . at . or before such other Justice or Justices of tiie )»eace for the same county, as should then i)e 1 here, to testify what he knows respecting tlie said charge so made against the said A. 1^. as aforesaid ; and whereas ])roof has this day been made ii])on oatli bcdore (ine) of such summons having been duly served ui)on the said K. F. ; and whereas the said I'j. K. lias neglected to ap])ear at the time and ))hice a])pointed iiy the said summons, and no just excuse has l>een ottered for such neglect ; These are there- fore to command you to bring and have the said K. F. before (me) on at o'cl()(d< in the (fore) noitn. at or before such other Justice or justices for the same county, as shall then be there, to testify what he knows concerning the said charge so made against the said A. \i. as aforesaid. (iiven under (my) hand and seal. tluM day of FliUMS. '2,11 , in llu' yt'iir , at , in the cuinily at'ort't^iiiil. .1. S . [seal] /. P., {Name of coitnti/.) yi.— {Sectional) WARRANT FOR A WITNKSS IN TIIF, FIRST INSTANCE. Cuinula, 1 Province of , >■ ('onnty of . ) To all or any of the constahles and other peaee oftieers in tlie sai<l count}- of . Whereas information has been laid hetore the undersigned , a justice of the peace, in and for the said county of hat (<fc., as in the summons) : and it having heen nnide to ajtpear to (Hie) u])on oath. (1) that K. F. of . (labourer), is likely to give material evidence for the prosecutitni, and that it is prohahle that ; he said K. F, will not attend to give evidence unless compelled to do o ; These are therefore to command you to hringa id have the said . '. F. before (me) on . at o'clock in the (fore) noon, at . or before such other justice or justices of the peace for the same county, as shall then be there, to testify what he knows concerning tlu^ said charge so nnule sigainst the said A. H. »n afore- said. (liven under my hand and seal, this day of , in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. .1. S., [SEAI,.] ./. P. (Name of county.) (1) For Korni of neposition that a i)er8on is a material witness, see p. 245, fast. 2;J2 PKAOTrCAI- CiirnK Th MAdlsrUATES. ^.—(Seetion 584.) WARRANT WHKN A WITNESS HAS NOT OBEYED THE SUBPUSNA. Ciiiiixla, ■) Province of , >- County oi' , ) To all or any ofllic constaMi's and otlitr |n'iict' otHccrs in the said counly ol' Whoiva.- inlbnnation iia\ ing been laid befoiv , a Justioo of the ])OiU'c, in and for the said county, that A. li. (&c., as in the summons) ; and there lieing reason to lielievethal E. F., of in tlie province of . (labourer), was likely to give material evidence for {the prosecution), a writ of subpo-na was issued byordi-r of , jixly^' 'd' (name of court) to the said 10. F„ requiring him to be and a])i)ear befori" (me) on , at or before sueh other justice or Justices of the j)eace for the same county, as shouUl then bo there, to testify what ho knows respecting the said charge so made against the said A. li., as aforesaiil ; and whereas proof has tliis day been made u])on oath bei'ore (me) of such writ of subpu'iui having been duly served upon the said K. V. ; a. id wliereas the said il F. has neglected to ap]»ear at the tinu! and place appointed by the said writ of sul)p«?na, and no juMt excuse has been ottered for siu'h neglect : These are tlierefore to command you to bring and have tiie said K,« F. before (7ne) on at oclock in the (fore) noon, at , or before <uch other justice or justices for the same county as shall then In- lher«', to testify what he knows concerning tlie said charge so nuide against the said A. 15. as aforesaid. Given under (m//) hand and seal, this day of , in tlie year , at , in the county aforesaid. .1 S.. [SEAI,.] J. P. (Name vf county.) FORMS. 233 O.— (Section SS").) WAKHANT UK CDMMITMKNT or A WITNESS FOR RK^•|'sr^■(i Tn HE SWORN OR TO (JIVE EVfDENCE. Caiiada. "1 Proviiu'i: of , 1- County di' I J To all 111' ;iny <>| tliu (.•on^<tables and otlior poaoc otficcrs in the county of , and to tho keeper of the common gaol at . in tho said county of Wlu'i'ras A. 1). was lately cdiarycd Ijefore , a justice of tiic peace in and for the said county of , for that (Ac, as in the summons) ; and it having been made to appear to (me) ujion oatii tiiat E. F., of , was liicely to give material evidence for the pi-osecution (I) duly issued (my) sum- mons to the sail! 10. F., i-equiring him to be and appear before me on . at . or In-fore such otlier justice or justices of the ])oace for the .same county as should then be there, to testiiy what he knows concerning the said charge so made against the said A. B. as aforesaid ; and the said E. F. now appear- ing before (7ne) (or l)eing brought before [me] by virtue of a war- rant in that behalf.) to testify as aforesaid, and being rc.pured to nuike oath or affirmation as a Avitness in that behalf, now refuses ho to do (or being duly sworn as a witness now refuses to answer cer- tain questions concerning the premises which ai'O now here put to him. and more |)articularly the foUowing : ) witbout ottering any just jxcuso for such refusal. These are there fore to command you, the said constables or peace officers, or any one of you. to take the said E. F. and him safely to convc}' to the common gaol at , in the county aforesaiil, and there to deliver him to the keeper thereof, together with this jirecept : And (I) do herebj' command you, the said keeper of the said com- mon gaol to receive the said H. F. into your custody in the said common gaol, and him there safely keep for the space of days, for his .saiil contempt unless in tho meantime ho consents to, he examined, and to answer concerning the premises ; and for your so doing, this shall be your sufficient warrant. -M PRACTICAL (ilU)K TO MACilSTHATES. (Tivi'ii uiidcr (my) haiul and seal, this day of in tho vrar , at , in tlic county at'oivsaid. J. S. [sEAIi] . . J: P.. {Name III' county) V. — (Section ")S(;.) WAIUiANT KE.MANlUNMi A I'UISONEK. t'linadii. "^ Province o]' . V County of , j To ill) or any of tlic oonstalilos and other peace otHcers in the naid county of . and to tlie lce»'j»i'r of tin' common gaol at . in tiie said county. Whorea8 A. B. was this (hiy chargi'd hefon- the ,. . 'ersigned . a Justice of tiie peace in and tor the said v,ountv of . for that (itc.. as in the uarrant to ap' rehend). ai'd it appears to (me) to in' nect-ssary to riMuand the sa'd A. W. : Th<'se are therefoi-e to comnuind you. tlie said co'.stahles and ])eace officers, or any of you. in Iler >[ajesty"s mime, forthwitli to convey the 8Hi<l A. H. to the common lijaol at . in the said county, anil tlu're to deliver him to the keeper tliert'of. together with this precept ; And I lu'reliy command you the said keeper to receive the said A. H. into your custody in tiie said common gaol, and there safely keep him until the day of (instant), when I hereliy comnuind you to have iiim at . at o'clock in the (fore) noon of the same day liefon- (//le) or hefore such other ju>tici' or Justices of the peace for the said county as shall then he there, to answer further to the said charge, aiul to lie further dealt with according to law. unlews y<m shall he otherwisi' ordered in the meantime. (tiven undei' my hand and si'al. this day ot in the year .at . in the county aforesaid. .1. S.. [SEAI,.] ./. P., (Name of county.) F )RMS. 235 Q.— (Section 587.) HECOONIZANCK OK HAII. INSTKAl) tiF RK.MANl) l)N AN All.IOL'RNMKNT OF EXAMINATION. Caniula, "I I'roviiu'c ol' , > (youiity of , 3 Ho it vemembored that nu the day of , in tlu' year . A. B.. o.' , (labourer). L. M., of . (grocer), ami X. ().. of (butcher), per- sonally caini' liofori' nio. , a justice of tlio jK-ace for the said county, and severally acknowledged them- selves to owe to our Sovi'reign Lady the Queen, her heirs and suc- cessors, the several sums following, that is to say : the said A. B., the sum of . and the said L. M. and N. O.. the sum of ea(di. of good and lawful current money of Canada, to he made and levied of their several goods and chattels, lands and tenements, ivspectively. to t'le use of our Lady the Queen, her heirs and successors, if he, the said A. E., fails in the condition endorsed (or hereunder written.) Taken and acknowledged the day and year fii-st above mentioned at before me. J. S., J. P., (Name of county.) CONDITION. The condition of the within (or above) written recognizance is- such. that, whereas the within luiunden A. B. was this day (or on last past) charged before me for that (<tr., as in the warrant) ; and whereas the examination of tlu' witnesses for the prosecution in this behalf is adjourned until the day of (instant) : If, therefore, the said A. 1}. appears before me on the said day of (instant), at o'clock in the (fore) noon, or itefore such other justice or justices- of the peace for the said county as shall then Ik- there, to answer (further) to the said charge, and to he further dealt with aecording^ k; 2:5); I'UACTroAi, ourDE to maoistrates. ti> l;i\v. till' Niiid i'('f(i,i!;iiiz!iiicc to lu' void. olherwiHo lo stand in full i'orcf ;tnd virtue. \l.— {Section oSK.) CK.UTIKrCATK < > 1' N ON A I'l'KA HANOK TO UK KNOOKSKO ii\ TllK UKOOG- NI/iANOE. I lii'i't'liy ccrlify llial the said A. H. lias not a])])('ared at the; timo and place in tiu' above condition mentioned, l)Ut therein has made a <let'aull. Iiy reason whereof (he within written recognizanco in jbrfeited. .1. S., J. P., (Name of county.) S.— {Section r)!M».) DErOSITtON OV A WITNESS. ( 'anada, Province of Counlv of :! The deposition of X. Y., of , taken l)ofore the undcr- signed. a justice of tho peace for the said county of , this day of , in the yeai- , at {or after notice to C. D.. wlio stands committed for ) in the presence and hearing of (1 D., who stands <diargeil that [s^tote the charge). The said deponent saith on his {oath or affirmal ion) as follows : ( fnsert deposition as nearly as possible in words of icitness). (1) (1) Wliere the acc'iised interpoFes an oliservation during the examination (if a witne«8, insert it, as follows : — " The prisoner here voluntarily says " ( f*ut hifi verij worih) [or " The prisoner — havinj; at this stage of the proceed- \u'^H, said he desired to make a statement, and having been given (clearly to iinderHtand that he was not obliged to say anything, now, but that whatever tm did say ould be taken down in writing and might be used as evident Hgiiinst hiin, — voluntarily says, as follows: — {Put hii> venj words), or," The prlHoner, tieing asked whether he wished to put any question to the witness, voluntarily says, {I^ut hin verij wordu). ] Kdlt.MS. 237 (// dejidsHionH of serernl witnesses are taken at the same time, they may he. ttihtn and siijned im follows : ) The (l(.'iH.sili()iis (.r X,, i.f . V..of , Z., ol' . iV'c. t;ikcii ill llic |ir('S('ii(H' iuiil lu'iiriiiy of C D., who stani|> cliMri^'cd I liiil 'I'lic <lc|ii)Mciii \. (on his oath or af/irviation) says as iollows : 'I'lic (lf|((>ii('iil \ . (on his oath or afflrmatinn) says as follows : Till' (li'|MiiicMt Z. (on his oath, <tc., d-c.) ( The dtjnature of the justice may he appended as follows :) Tlic (l('|iositi()iis of X.. Y., Z., iVc. written on IheHovenil slicotH of l»:i|n'r. to tin- last of wliicli iii_>' siy;iiatiif(' is aiiiiexed, wuro taken in till) |)resonce and lieariiiif of C D.. and siijned i)j- tin- said X., V., Z., roH|iecliv('ly. in ids pivsciico. fn witiioss whereof 1 have in ilio prcsenci' of tlie said ( ". D. sii^ned my name. J. S., J. P., {Name of county.) '[\— Section .")!»].) Caiuuhi, Province of County ol HTATKMKNT Ol-' THK AOOirSKD. ,\ A. B. stands eharufod liefore the undersiifiied , a JuHlice of tlie |)eaee in and for tiie eounly aforesaid, this day of . in the year , for that the said A. M., on , at (ibc, as in the captions of the depositions) ; and the said cliarn'e hein^ wml to the said A. M., and tlie witnesses for the proseeiition. ('. J). an<i K. F., ho'r.g sovoraily exuininud in liis prt'sence. tlie said A. H. is now addressed liy me as follows : " lliiving heard the evidence, do you wish to " suy anything in answer to the charge ? Vou are not ohiiged to " suy anything uidess >i>ii desire to do so ; hut whatever you Hay '• will be taken down in writing, and nni}' he given in eviuf'co 2:58 PRACTICAL (HinE TO MAGISTRATES. '• agiiinst y«>ii s't your triul. You must cli'iU'ly UMdcrstantl that. " you have nothing to liojx' from any promisi' of favour, and " notliinir to fear from any throat which may iuivc hccu iicid out '■ to indufo you to mako any admission or confession of guilt. Iiul '• whatever you now say may be given in evidence against yon '■ upon your trial, notwithstanding su(di promise or threat." Whereupon the .said A. H. says as follows ; {Here state whaterer the prisoner says, and in his very words as nearly as possible. Get him to sign it if he icill.) (1) A. W. Taken before me, at . the day and year first above mentioned. .1. S. [seal.] J. P. {Name of county.) v.— (Section 5i»5.) FORM OK RECOGNIZANCE WUEKE THE l'K(...ECITOR REQt IRES THE JUSTICE TO BIND HI.M OVER TO PROSECUTE AFTER THE CHARGE IS DISMISSED. . ' ^ . Canada, ') Province of , >• County of , 3 Whereas C. D. was charged before me upon the information of E. v., that C. 1). {state the charge), and upon the liearing of the said charge I discharge the said C. I)., and the said K. P. desires to prefer an indictment against the said C. .0. respecting the said charge, and has required me to bind him over to prefer such an in- dictment at {here describe the hext practicable sitting of the court by ivhich the person dischargtd would be tried if committed.) (1) When there are several persons oliarged with the same offence, thert> need not be a separate statement for each person accused; but all their namee should be stated at the coniinencement of the above form ; and then, in the latter part of the form,— alter giving the statement of the prisoner, whose name comes first, — say, for the second one in order, — "And the said says, as follows;"— (Acre give the statement of the gecond prisoner) and so on, with each of the several persons accused. FCtHMS. 2H!) Till' niulersii^iuMl K. K. lu'ivhy hiiuls hiinscif to perforin tlic fol- lowin/:^ ()l)liy;ali()ii, that is to say. tliat lie will ])iTf'er and prosieulc an inilii'tment rospootiiig tho said chalet' ai^ainst the said ('. I), at (as above). And the said K. F. aeknowledgos himself bound to forfeit to the Crown the snni of S in case he fails to per- form the said ohliijfation. K. F. Taken before me. J. S.. ./. P.. (Name of coxiidy.) Y .—(Section 5\Ul.) WARRANT OK COMMITiMKNT. Canada. Province of , , County of , ) I To the constable of , and to the keeper of the (common gaol) at , in the said countj'' of Wliereas A. B. Avas this day charged before me, J. S., one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said county of , on the oath of C D., of , (farmer), and othei-s for that (&c., stating shortly the offence) : Those are therefore to command you the said constable to take the said A. B., and him safely convey to the (common gaol) at aforesaid, and there to deliver him to the keeper thereof, together witli this precept : And I do hereby command you tho said keeper of the said (common gaol) to receive the said A. B. into your custody in the said (common gaol), and there safely keep him until he shall be thence delivered by due course of law. Given under my hand and seal. thi,s day of , in the year , at .in the county aforesaid. J. S.. [seal] J. P., (Name of county.) 240 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. W.— (^Section 598.) RKCOGNIZANCE TO PROSECUTE. Canada, Province of County of :1 Be it remembered that on the day of , in the year , C. D., of , in the of , in the said county of , (farmer), personally came before lae , a justice of the peace in and for the said county of , and acknowledged himself to owe to our Sovereign Lady the Queen, her heirs and successors, the sum of , of good and lawful current money of Cahada, to be made and levied of his goods and chattels, lands and tenements, to the use of our said Sovereign Lady the Queen, her heirs and successors, if the said C. D. fails in the condition endorsed (or hereunder written). Taken and acknowledged the day and year first above mentioned at ' ' , before me. J. S., J, P., (Name of county.) ' CONDITION TO PROSECUTE. The condition of the within (or above) written recognizance is such that whei'eas one A. B.. was this day charged before me, J. S., a justice of the peace within mentioned, for that (ifcc, as in the caption of the depositions) ; if, therefore, he the said C D. appears at the court by which the said A. B. is or shall be tried * and there duly prosecutes such charge then the said recognizance to be void, otherwise to stand in full force and virtue. X.— (Section 5dS). COGNIZANCE TO PROSECUTE AND GIVE EVIDENCE. (Same as the last form, to the asterisk, * andthenthus) : — And there duly prosecutes such charge against the said A. B. for the offence FORMS. 241 f ulbresiiid and gives eviilenco thereon, as well to the jurors who shall then inquire into the said ottenco, as also to them who whall pass upon the trial of the said A. li., then the said recognizance to be void, or else to stand in full force and virtue. Y.— {Section a'.tS). (Same as the last form but one, to the asterisk, ■^- and then thus:-^ And there gives such evidence as he knows upon the charge to be then and there ])refeiTed against the said A. E., for the offence aforesaid, then the said recognizance to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and virtue. Z.— (Section 500.) COMMITMENT OF A WITNESS FOR REFUSINU TO ENTER INTO THE RECOGNIZANCE. Canada, ~\ Province of , > County of ,J To all or any of the peace officers in the said county of , and to the keeper of the common gaol of the said county of , at in the said county of , Whereas A. B., was lately charged before the undersigned (name of the justice of the peace), a justice of the peace in and for the said county of , for that (tfcc, as in the summons to the witness), and it having been made to appear to (me) upon oath that E. P., of , was likely to give material evidence for the prose- cution. (I) duly issued (my) summons to the said E. F., requiring him to be and appear before (me) on , at or before such other justice or justices of the peace as should then be there, to testify what he knows concerning the said charge so made against the said A. B. as aforesaid ; and the said E. P. now appearing before (me) (or being brought before (me) by virtue of a warrant in that behalf to testify as aforesaid), has been now examined before (me) touching the premises, but being by (me) required to enter 242 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. into ii recognizance conditi'^ned to give evidence against the said A. B. now refuses so to do : These are thei-efore to command you the said ])eact> otttcci-s. or any one of you. to take the said E. F. and him safely convey to tlie common gaol at , in the county aforesaid, and there deliver him to the said keeper thereof, togetlier with this precept : And I do liereby command you, the said kee])er of the .said common gaol, to receive the said K. K. into j-our custody in the said common gaol, there to imprison and safely keep him until after the trial of the said A. M. forthe offence aforesaid, unh'ss in the meantime the said K. F. duly enters into such recognizance as aforesaid, in the sum of before some one justice of the ]»eace for the .said county, conditioned in the usual form to appear at the court by which the said A. B. is or shall be tried, and there to give evidence ujion the charge which shall then and there be preferred against the said A. B. for the offence aforesaid. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in tlie year , at , in t'le county aforesaid. J. S.. [SBAF,.] J. P., {Name of county.) A A. —(Section 509.) SUBSEQUENT ORDER TO UISCIIAHOE THE WITNESS. Canada, Province of (younty of :1 To the keeper of the common gaol at , in the county of , aforesaid. Whereas b>- (my) order dated the (hiy of (instant) reciting than A. H. was lately before tlu-n charged before (me) for a certain offence therein mentioned, and that E. F. having ai)peared befoi-e (wie) and being examined as a witness for the pro- secution on that behalf, refused to enter into recognizance to give evidence against the said A. B., and I thei-efore tliereby committed the said K. F. to your custody, aiul required you safely to keep him until after the t 'al of the said A. B. for the offence aforesaid ; un- less in the meantime he should enter into such recognizance as FORMS. 243 aforesaid ; and wherouH for want of sufficient evidence against the said A. B.. the said A. H. lias not been committed or holden to bail for the said offence, but on the contrary thereof has been since dis- charged, and it is therefore not necessary that the said E. F. should be detained longer in your custody' : These are therefore to order and direct you the said keeper to discharge the said K. F. out of 3^our custody, as to the said commitment, and suffer him to go at large. (liven under my hand and seal, this ; day of , in the year , at . in the county aforesaid . ■ .1. S., [seal.] ' J. P., (^Name of county.) BB.— (Section 601.) RECOriNIZANOE OF BAIL. Canada, ^ Province of , >• County of . j Be it remembei'ed that on the day of , in the year , A. B. of , (labourer.) L. M. of (grocer), and N. O. of . (hutclier). personally came before (us) the undersigned, (two) justices of the peace for the county of , and severally acknowledged themselves to owe to our Sovereign Lady the Queen, her heirs and successors, the several sums following, that is to say : the said A. B. the sum of , and the said L. M. and N. O. the sum of each, of good and lawful current money of Canada, to be made and levied of their several goods and chattels, lands and tenements res- pectively ; to the use of our said Sovereign Lady the Queen, her heirs and successors, if he, the said A. B., fails in the condition en- dorsed (or hereunder written^. Taken and aknowledged the day and year first above mentioned, at befoi-e us. J. S., J. N., J. P., (Name of county.) 244 PKA-OnOAI. GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. CONDITION. The condition of the within (^or above) written recognizance, is such that whereas the said A. B. was this day charged before (us), the justices within mentioned for that (&c., as in the warrant) ; if, therefore, the said A. B. appears at the next court of oyer and ter- miner (or general gaol delivery or court of General or Quarter Ses- sions of the Peace) to be holden in and for the county of , and there surrender himself into the custody of the keeper of the common gaol (or lock-up house) there, and pleads to such indict- ment as may be found against him by the grand jury, for and in respect to the charge aforesaid, and takes his trial upon the same, and does not depart the said court without leave, then the said re- cognizance to be void, otherwise to stand in full force and virtue. GC— (Section 602.) WARRANT OF DELIVERANCE ON BAIL BEING GIVEN FOR A PRISONER ALREADY COMMITTED. Canada, Province of County of :1 To the keeper of the common gaol of the county of at . , in the said county. Whereas A. B., late of , (labourer), has before (m) (two) justices of the peace in and fo*. the said county of , entered into his owr reco-^niizance, and found sufficient sureties for his appearance at the next court of oyer and terminer or general gaol delivery (or Court of General or Quai'ter Sessions of the Peace), to bo holden in and for the county of , to answer our Sovereign Lady the Queen, for that ((fee, 05 in the commitment), for which he was taken and committed to 3-our said common gaol : These are therefore to command you. in Her Majesty's name, that if the said A. B. remains in your custody in the said common gaol for the said cause, and for no other, you shall Ibrthwith suffer him to go at largo. FORMS. 245 Given under our hands and weals, this day of , in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. • " J. S., [seal.] , ; J. N., [seal.] ' \ /' , J. P., {Name of county.) DT>.— (Section 601.) ' i" , > : .i gaoler's receipt to the constable for the prisoner. I hereby certify that I have received from W. T., constable of the county of , the body of A. B., together with a warrant under the hand and seal of J. S., Esquire, justice of the peace for the said county of , and that the said A. B. was sober (or as the case may be), at the time he was delivered into my custody. P. K Keeper of the common gaol of the said county. ADDITIONAL FORMS. PBPOSITION THAT A PERSON IS A MATERIAL WITNESS. Canada, Province of County (or. District, etc.,) of :! The deposition of A. B., of , taken at , in the said (County) of , this day of , A. D., 180 , before me the undersigned, a justice of the peace (or, as the case may be), for the said (County) of , who, being duly sworn, doth depose and say that , of , is likely to give material evidence on behalf of the prosecution (or " accused ") touching the matter of the annexed (or '" within ") in- formation (or " complaint ') ; and that he the said A. B. verily 246 PRACTrCAI, OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. believes that the said will not appear volun- tarily for the pur]ioso of being examined as a witness without being compelled so to do. Taken and sworn before me. at ") tl'.is day f A. li. of , A. D. 189 . 3 ORnER TO BRINO UP ACCUSED BEFORE EXPIRATION OP REMAND. Canada, Province of County (or District, etc.) ot :1 To the keeper of the common gaol of the (Comity) of at , in the said (County) Whereas A. B. (hereinafter called the " accused ") was on the day of comnutted by (wie) to your c ustcjdy in the said {common gaol), charged for that (jstc, as in the warrant remanding the prisoner), and, by the warrant in that behalf,* you were commanded to have him at on the day <»f now (next) at o'clock in the fore- noon, before such justice or ju.stice of the peace for the said (county) as might then be there, to answer further to the said charge, anil to be further dealt with, according to law ; (or, slhortly, from the asterisk,-^- " he was renumded to the day of next '), unless you should be otherwise ordered in the meantime ; And whereas it appears to me. the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the .said county) of , (or, " one of the said justices ") to be ex])edient that the said accused should be further examined before the ex- jdration of tlie .said renuvnd ; These are therefore to order you in Her Majesty's name to bring and have the said accused at , at o'clock in the (fore) noon of the same day before (me) or before such other justice or justices of the ])eace for the said county as shall then be there, to answer further to the said charge, and to ADDlTIONAIi FORMS. 247 be further dealt with aecording to hiw, unless you shall Ik- other- wise ordered in the meantime. (iiven under my hand and seal, this ilay of in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., .7. /*., {name of county). MEMORANnUM TO BE WRITTEN ON DOCUMENTS PROUUCED IN EVIDENCE. This is the plan (or " letter." or, as the case may be) produced to ine, the undersigned, one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace for I lie (^county) of , on the examination of A. B., •harged with arson (forgery, etc.). and referred to in the deposition • if (1 1). touching the said charge taken before me this ..ay of , 189 . J. S. INFORMATION AND COMPLAINT OF SURETIES FOR A PERSON CHARGED WITH AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE. 80 AS TO HAVE HIM CO-MMITTED IN DISCHARGE OF THEIR RECOGNIZANCES. Proceed as in form C. at p. 136, ante., to the words, " who saith, ' (altering tt to the plural when the complaint is by two or more sureties, <ind then continue thus:) that the said ('. D. anil E. V. (names of ■sureties complaining) were on the day of now last ])ast, several!}' and respectively duly bound by recogniz- ance before ,]. l\. Ksquire, one of ller Majesty's justices of the peace for the said (county) of , in the sum of each, upon condition that one A. B., of , should appear at the next term of the Court of (Queen's Bench (f-'rown side) for the district of , (or Court of Oyer and Terminer ami fieneral (laol Delivery, or Court of (Jeneral or (Quarter Sessions of the Peace) to be holden in and for the (county) of , and there surrender himself into the custody of the keeper of the (common gaol) there, and plead to such indict- 248 I'HACTicAr, (uriDE to maolstrates. iiu!iit as might bo found aguinst him by the Grand Jury for (»r in respect of the cliarge of (stating the charge shurtly), and take his trial upon the same and not dejiart the said court without leave ; and that these comphiinants have reason to suspect and believe, and do verily susped, and believe, that the said A. E. is about to depart fi'om this part of the country ; and therefore they pray of me the saiii justice that I would issue my warrant of apprehension of the said A. Ji in order that he may be surrendered to ])rison in discharge of thcni his said bail. Taken of and ■ i sworn before me at~ in the (county) o\' , this day , 189 . ■ J C. B E. F, WARRANT TO APPREHEND THE ACCUSED UPON THE INFORMATION OF HIS SURETIES. "Canada, "j Province of , > County (or District, etc.) of .J To all or any of the constables and other peace officers in the said county of , and to the keeper of the common gaol at , in the said county. Whereas you the said C D. and E. F. were, etc. (as in the infor- mation and complaint, p. 247, aiite, to the end) : These are therefore to autliorize you the said V. B. and E. F., and also to command you the said (constable or other peace officer), in Her Majesty's name forthwith to a])pxehend the said A. B., and to bring him before me or some justice or justices of the peace in and for the said (county) to the intent that he may be c(»mmitted to the (common gaol) in and for the said (county) until the next Court of Oyer and Terminer and General (niol Belivery (or Court of General or Quar- ter Sessi<ms of the Peace), to be holden in and for the said (county) of , (or, etc., as the case may be), unless he find new and sufficient sureties to become bound for him in such recogniz- ance as aforesaid. ADDITIONAL FORMS. 240 Given undei* my haiKi and soal, this day of , in the year of our Lord , at . in Iho {county) aforesaid. COMMITMENT OF THE ACCUSED ON 1118 APPREHENSION AT THE INSTANCE OF HIS BAIL. Canada. '\ Province oi" . >• f 'oiinty (or District, etc.) of . ) To all or any of the tojistahles and other peace officers in the said county of . and to the koe])er of the common gaol at , ill the said county. Whereas on the day of , instant, com- plaint was made to me, the undersigned (or J. S), one of Her Majesty's justices of the peace in and for the said (county) of , by C. I), and E. F. of that {as in the information and complaint, p. 147, ante, to the end) 1 (or the said justice) thereupon issued my warrant authorizing the said C. D. ami V). F., and also commanding the said constables ot and all other peace officers in the said (county) of . in Her Majesty's name forthwith to appre- hend the said A. B., and to bring him (follow to end of warrant, supra) ; and whereas the said A. B. hath beeT\ apprehended under and by virtue of the said warrant, and being now brought before me the sai<l justice (or. me the undersigned, one, etc.) and sur- rendered by the said C. I), and E. F., his said sureties, in discharge of their said recognizances, T have i-equired the said A. B. to tind new and sufficient sureties to become bound for him in such recognizances as aforesaid, but the said A. B. hath now refused so to do : These are tlierefore to command you the said constables (t other peace officers) in Her Majesty's name forthwith to take and safely to convey the said A. B. to the said (common gaol) at , in the said (county), and there deliver him to the kee])er thereof, together with this precejit : and T hereby command you the said keeper to receive the said A. B. into your custody in the said (common gaol), and him there safely to keep until the next 250 PRACTICAL (HUI)E TO MAdlSTIlATES. Court of Oyer and Tonniiicr aiui (roneral Gaol Dolivory {or Court of (Joiicral or (iuartor Sessions of the Peace), to he holden in and for the said (county) of , unless in the meantime the said A. B. shall tind new and sultieient sureties to liecome bound for him in such reeognizanee as aforesaid. (Jiven under my hand and seal, this day of in the year of our Lord, , at . in the (county) aforesaid. J. S. [i.. s.] INDICTABLE OKFENCBS. 251 TABLE OF INDICTABLE OFFENCES UNDER THE CODE, Offences against public order, internal and external. Treason and other offences against the Queens authority and i'erson. Abt. 05 67 68 70 71 72 73 Treason Accessory atter fact to Treiuoii- Levying war, etc Offkhcb. Treasonable offences Conspiracy Co intimidate a Legis- lature - Assaults on the Queen Inciting to mutiny 'D Enticing soldiers or seumun to desert Unlawiully obtaining official in- formation Communication of information by official. If to a foreign Stitte.. In any other case J Punishment. Death . ... Two years. Death Life Fourteen years dcven years whipping.. . Lite and Five years One yearorSlOOflne Life One year and $!00 fine, or both — Tribunal. Sup.CourtCr. Juris do Sup.CourtOr. Juris. or Cuuri Martial.. Sup.CourtOr. Juris. do do do General or Quarter Sessions. Sup.CourtCr. Juris, do do 3 years. 3 years. LIMITATION. Nate. It will be understood that, with regard to offences mentioned in this tabic as triable in a Sup. Court of Cr. Juris., those offences cannot be tried in a Court of (ienoral or Quarter Sessions, and that with regard to offences mentioned as triable in a Court of Ueneral or Quarter Sessions, the latter Court has not o.Yclusive juris:diction over these offeiooi, but that, in relation to them, its jurisdiction is concurrent with thatot the Superior Cour'- of Cr .1 uris. Unlawful Assemblies, JIiot.s, Breaches of the Peace. Art. 81 82 83 86 86 87 I 88S 89 90 91 99 Offence. Unlawful assembly . Riot Opposing Reading cf Riot Act. Riotous destruction Riotous damage Unlawful drilling Forcible entry or detainer.. Affray Challenge to tight. Inciting Indians to riot. PUNISHJIKNT. One year Two years Life Life Seven years Two years One year One year: with hard labor. Three years Two years Tribunal. General or Quarter Sessions, do do do do do do do do do limitation. one ye 6 mentha (I) Enticing soldiers, etc., may also be tried summarily. Fine $2U0, and not less than $50, In default of payment, six months imprisonment. 17 252 I'llACTICAIi GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. UNLAWFirL USE AND POSSESSION OF EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCBS AND Offensive Weapons. Art. 1011 101 104 li:i lU 115 Ofpkncb. PUNISHIIKNT. Causing dangerous explosions — Life llaving explosives Fourteen years MakinK explosives iSeven years jllaving arms for dangerous pur-l j poses IFiveycars.. iSiuuggiers carry! nu arms ^Ten yoar.'< . . 'Refusing to deliver weapon to a iustioe Five years.. Cuming near meeting armed $10t' tine, or (i m'ths or both Lying in wait near meeting i$2U0iine, or 3 m'ths or both Tribunal. Sup.CouttCr. Juris- do do do do do do do LIUITATION, 6 months, one year. do do SEDITIOUS OFFENCES. Ab;. i 120 I'.'l 124 lai 126 Offence. PU.N'ISHUBNT. Administering or taking oath to com- mit an Indictable oflenoe Fourteen years. Administering or taking other unlaw- ful uaths Seven years...., Seditious offences » Two years 'Libels on foreign sovereigns One year Spreading false news One year Tribunal. Sup. Ct. Cr. Juris. do do do do Piracy. Art. Offknck. PrNISHMKNT. Tbibunal. 127 Piracy by the Law of Nations Death or Life Impri- sonmont Sup. Court Cr. Juris. 128 Life Death Piratical Acts endangering Life Not Fighting Pirates. do 129 Six months Imprison- do INDIOTAnrE OFFBNOES. 253 Offences Against the Administration of Law and Justice. CORHUPTION AND DISOBEDIENCE. Art. 131 132 133 13.i i;J6 lS7a l.W 139 140 Ml 142 143 144 Corruption of JuiIkcs and Logij latora Corruption xf ott'ioers of justice. Frauds upon tiio Govornnient. Brench of trust by public otlicer Corrupt practioes in municipoJ nffitirs Offknob. Selling ofiioes, t&o PONlaHMENT. Fourteen years • . . Fourteen years.... «l,(in() fine and one year, also (S luos extra in default of paying fmu. Dis- abled from con- tracting with or holding office un der Government. Five years Sup.CourtCr.Jiiris do do do $l,tiO01ine and two years, also 6 mos, extra in defauh of paying tine Five years. (.See Art.9.il) Disability from holding of- fice One year One year Two years. One year. . Disobedience to a statute Disobedience to orders of Court. . Neglect of peace officer.<4 lo sup I)re88 riot Neglfct to aid peace officer in sup- pre.^'sing riot Neglect to aid peace officer arrest- ing offender {Six noiiths Misconduct of officers entrusted! with warrants, etc !Fine and imprison- 1 ment. (See Arts. I »3t&951) Obstructing public officer Ton years Obstructing peace officer. (1) . Two years Tribukal. do do Gen'lorQu'tr. Sessc do do do do do do tilHITilTIUN. 2 years. 2 years. Misleading Justice. Art. ] * 146 147 l.W 151 162 153 1S4 155 lfi6 157 158 Offbxck. PuNmRHRNT- Perjury Fourteen year.« and Subornation of perjury False oaths False statements Fabricating evidence Conspiracy to bring false accusa- tion Administering oaths without authority Corrupting jurors or witnesses Compounding penal actions. . Fourteen years. Seven years.- •• Two years Seven years. ... Corruptly taking reward for helping to recover stolen property Advertising reward for stolen property -». , Signing false certificate of eze- euting death sentence Fourteen years and ten years .ii.W fine or 3 mos. Two years Fine not exceeding penalty com pounded for.... Seven years. $250 penalty. Two years . . . Tribunal,. Qen'l or Qu'tr Sess. do do do do do do do LIMITATION. do do Civil Court Gen'l or Qu'tr Sesg. 6 months U\T''\? "ff*"*®' ''6»W«? being indictable, may also be tried summarily, before two justices, and in that case the punishment upon conviction is 6 months with hard labor, or $100 fine. 254 practical guide to jiagistrates. Escapes anh J?escues. Art. 159 180 )fil 162 167 I 168 Opfkn'ck. I PCNISHMRNT. Being at large while under sentence. . Two years". . Assisting eseapo of prisoner of war- ■ Five years Prison-breach Seven years . Attempted priiion breach Two years... Escapes from lawful custody jTwo years... Rescuing prisoners or assisting escape Seven years and 5 yearf .Conveying anything into prison to aid: I escape jTwo years Unlawfully procuring prisoner's dis-' ' charge Two years Tribunal. (jcn'l or Quarter Sess. do do do do do do do Offences against Religion, Morals, and Public Convenience. Offences AiiAixsi Reliuion. Art. Offknck. PUNISHUKNT. 170 i Blasphemous libels Oneyear. 171 172 iObstructing otRciating clergyman. iViolence to ofliciating clergyman. Two years ■ Two years Trii-.unau Genl. or Quar. Ses^, do do OfFE.VCES A(iAI\ST ^rORALlTY. Abt. 174 175 176 178 179 180 181 182 181 181 185 186 187 188 18!) 1!W Ol-FKNCK. PUXISHMKNT. Tribunal. iUHITATION Unnatural offence ^Life Attempt to commit sodomy i I'di :,«iir.< Incest i Fourteen years and whipping Acts of grosp indecency Five years Publishing obscene matter Two years Posting immoral books, etc Two .year Seduction of girl under sixteen. . Two yei.rs SeduetioMunderpromiseol m'riiige Two years Seduction of a ward or a servant, fiictory girl, etc .. Two years Seduction of female passengeis on vessels MOfiflneoroneycar Unlawfully defiling women Two years with hnrd labor Parent or guardian proo ring de- Fourteen yeors and filement of girl live yoars . ... Householders permitting dcfile- inent of girl.'i. Ton years & two yrs Consiiiracy todellle I wo y^ars ... Carnally knowing idJD'S Four years Prostitution of Indiiin wmnen ShVI fine orsix mths Qenl. or Quar. Sess. do I do I d. I do do do do do o do do do do do do One year. do do One year, do do Art. 192 194 198 ■201 202 203 204 205 206 indiotabiie offences. Nuisances. 255 Ofrkncr. Common nuisance , Selliniz things unfit for fond Keeping disorderly house, (bawdy house, earning house) (1) flaming in stocks, etc Frequenting bucket-shops Gambling in public conveyances (rail ways, steamers, etc.) (2) Betting and pool-sel linii .. Lot tcries Misconduct towards human remains . PUNISHMRNT. One year, or fine. Art. 934) One year (See One y ar Five years and $500 fine One year TRrnuNAL. One year One year ^nd §1000 fine Two years A- $2000 fine Pive years flenl. or Quar. Uess. do do d d; o o ' o Offences against the person and reputation. Duties tending to the pheservation of life. Art. 215 Ofkknck, PONISHHENT- 'Neglecting duty to provide necessa-: ries Three years., 216 Abandoning ohildren under two years, 1 of age Three years. 217 Causing bodily harm to apprentices or servants Three years. . Triiiunal. Oeneral or Quarter Ses- sions. do do Homicide, Murdeu, Manslauqiitbr, etc. Art. Ofpknck. PomSIlUKNT Tribunal. 231 Murder Attempt to commit murder Death Sup. Court Cr. Juris- do 232 Lite 233 Threats to murder Ten vfliirs do 284 235 Conspiracy to murder Accessory after the fact to murder. . . Manslaughter Aiding and abetting siricide Fourteen years Life :.... do do 236 Life Glen, or Quarter Bess, do 237 Life Two years Life, or 238 239 Attempt to commit suicide Neglecting to obtain bBEictanoe in child birth do do 24C Concealing dead body of child Two veiira do (1) These ofTenoes, as well as being indiotable, may also be tried summarily under arliolei 783 and 784, jkm^ (which see). (2) Railway conductors, steamboat officers, station masters, etc., are obliged to arrest and prosecute offenders under this article and arc liable to $100 fine, for m gleet to do so. Every company or other owner of a railway oar, or steamboat must keep a copy <if the above Article, 203, posted up conspicuously in their railway oar. or steamboat, and are lia- ble, for neglect to do soi to $100 penalty. 266 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTBATE3. Bodily injueies, and acts and omissions causing danger to THE person. Abt. 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 256 257 Oppenoe. Wounding with intent. Unlawful wounding Shooting at H. M's vessels. Wounding j)ubUc officer DisabKng or dragging with criminal intent Endangering life by poison, etc. ■ • Administering poison with intent to injure Causing bodily injuries by explosives. Attempting bodily injury by explosives Setting spring guns and man traps. . . . Intentionally endangering persons on railways Negligently endangering persons on railirays Negligently causing bodily injury Injuring persons by, furious driving. . . Preventing ihe saving of person ship- wrecked Sending unseaworthy ships to sea.. . Taking unseaworthy ships to sea PU.VISHMINT. life Three years. Fourteen years. ... Life and whipping. Fourteen years Three years Life Life or fourteen years. Five years Life. Two years. Two years. Two years. Seven years . Five years. . Five years... Tbibuhal. Qenl. or Qoar. do do do do do do do do de do do do do do do Assaults. Abt. Ofkknck. POMSUHRNT. Tbibunal. 2.59 260 262 Indecent assaults on females (1) Indecent assaults on males Assault causing actual bodily harm.. ■ . Aggravated assaults, assault on public Two years and whipp'g Ten years and whippi'g Genl. or Quar. Sess. do do 263 do 264 Seven years One year or $100 fine.. do 265 (2) do (1) Under Article 783, jmut, whenever a person is charged before a magistrate with having committed an aggravated n«sauU, or with having committed an assault upon any female whatsoever, or upon any male child under fourteen, or with having assaulted, obstructed, molested or hindered any peace officer or public officer in the lawful performance of his duty, the magistrate may, subject to the provisions of part LV of the Code, try the charge sum- marily. See also Article 785, pual, whieh in reiiard to the Province of Ontario, gives, to a police magis- trate or stipendiary magistrate, power to try summarily, with the accused'n consnit, any per- son charged before him, with any offence triable in a court of General or Quarter Sessions. (2) This offence ifi also triable in a summary manner, and is then punishable by a fine of $30 and costs, or two months imprisonment, with or without h. 1. indictablb offences. Eape and Procuring Abortion. 261 Abt. 267 288 209 270 271 272 273 274 Offrnoi. Rape Attempt to commit rape Defiling itirl under fourteen Attempt to defile ^rl under f mrteen. KillinK unborn child Procuring abortion •_ Woman procuring her own misoar riage Supplying means of procuring abor- tion Pdnishment. Death or life imprison- ment Seven years Life and whipping Two years & whiiining. Life Life Seven years Two years Tbibunal Sup. Ct. Cr. Juris. do Gen. or Quarter Se 88. do do do do do Offences against Conjugal and Parental Rights — Bigamy — Abduction. Art. 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 QpraNOK. Bigamy Feigned marriages Polygamy Solemnization of marriage with out lawful authority Solemnization of marriage con trary to law Abduction of i woman Abduction of an heiress Abduction of an unmarried girl under sixteen Stealing children under fourt en. PONIBHMBNT. Tribunal. LIIIITATION- Seven years (second oflence fourt' nyrs) Seven years , . Five yrs.ife $500 fine Pinei 1) or two years Qen. or Quart, Sess. do do do do do do do 4 2 years. Pine CI) or one year Fourteen years Fourteen y.ars ... Seven yeard Defamatory Libel. Abt. Ofpbhor. PuNisniiRifT. Tribu.val. 300 Rxtortion bv deffunatorv libel Two years or $600 fine, or both PublishiriK libel knowing it to be false. DefiLtnatorv libel • Sup. Court Or. Juris, do 301 Two years or|400fine, or both 302 One year, or $200 fine, do — (1) See Article 984 of the Code, aa to regulation of fine. 258 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAOISTRATES. Offences aqaimt rights of property and rights arising out of contracts, and offences connected with trade. TUEKT AND JtECEIVING. (1) AttT. Oppenck. PUMSHMRNT. Uenl. or Quar. Sess. do do do 300 356 307} 33U 308 320 309 J 320) :^ios SliO) 312 S 354) 314 315 319 321 322 .■i23 324 326 327 328 (2) 329 330 331 ;M4 334 335 33b 338 337 .333 341 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 ;j60 351 353 S 323 j ^ ^ ^ (1) Under Article 783, of the Code wheneyer a perBon is charged before a magistrate with having committed theft, or obtaining property by false pretences or receiving stolen pro- perty, and the value of the property in (|uestion dues not exceed ten dollars the magistrate may, subject to the provisions of Part lv of tlie Code, tr>- the charge summarily. (2) R.S. C.,c. 36, »ec. 80. (3) The fine is in the discretion of the Court. (4) This means live cattle. The stealing of a dead oow, etc., is punishable under Art. 356, by seven years. Theft of things under seizure 'Seven years; 2nd of- . fence, ten years. Killing cattle, with intent to steal the carcase, etc Fourteen years. .. Theft by Agent Fourteen years. . . Theft by holder of power of attorney . Tourtecn years . . . Misappropriating money, etc., held un-i der direction Fourteen years.. . . Fraudulent concealment of gold, etc.,' by mining partner Two years Receiving stolen property Fourteen years... Receiving .stolen post-letter, elc Five years Thefts by clerics, servants. Rank em- ployees, (iov'ment and other ollicials Fourteen years. . . Public ."ervants refusing to deliver up books, etc Fourteen years • • • Theft by tenant or lodger Two years k four years Stealing a will ILife Stealing a document of title Three years iSU'aling .indicia I or otllcial documents. Three years Steiilfhg post-letter l)ags, etc Life Stealing a post-letter, etc Seven years Stealing other mailable matter Five years. Unlawfully opening a post-letter, etc . Five years. Stealing election documents Fine, (S) <ir 7 yrs, or Stealing railway, tramway, or steamer both ticket Two years Stealing cattle (4) Fourteen years. ... Stealing oysters or oyster brood.. Seven years Dredging in oyster beds Three months Stealing fixtures in buildings or lands Seven years Steolingtrees, etc., worth $25 Two years Stealing trees, otCj, worth .$5, in a gar- don, etc Two years Stealing a tree, etc., worth 25c. after two other convictions Five years Fraudulently taking, etc., drift timber, etc Three years Stealing plants, etc., in a garden after one other conviction Three years . Stealing ores of metils, etc iTwo years Stealing from the per.«on Fourteen ye»rs.... Stealing in a dwelling-house Fourteen years. . .. Stealing l)y picklocks, etc il'ourteen years Stealing goods in process of manufac-; ture ...'Five years Fraudulent disposal of goods ent.-ustedi to manufacture ]Two years . Stealing from ships, wharves, etc ; Fourteen years, Stealing wreck Stealing from a railway ^^tation, or en- gine, etc Fraudulently destroying a will .... Tribunal. seven years. Fourteen years. .. Life INDICTABLE OFFENCES. 259 OBTAININd BY FaLSE PrETENCES, ClUMKVAL HrEACII OF TrUST, AND Other KkaijDs. Art. 353 324 354 355 ;tr,6 359 3ti0 361 362 3(t3 364 (6) (6) (7) 365 366 36" 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 380 381 382 385 386 387 390 OPKRNCE. Krniiiliilcntly destroying other docu- ments Kriiudulent concealment nf property. IJrinuinK stolen r>roperty intoCiiniida Stealinp in ciises not othorwise pro- vided lord) ObtnininR by false pretences Obtaininn pxeeutionof valuable secur- ity by false pretences Falseb' protending to send money etc in a post-letter ObtaininK passage by false ticket Criminal breach breach of trust. .... False accounting by a director or oli'.cial ofa corpo-ato body... Fraudulent preference by a bank resident, director, etc . ■ ■ Fiilse bank returns, etc., by bank otllcials Unlawlully using thetitleof " Dank,' etc Making fal.se prospectus or statement by promoter or director, etc, of Company False accounting by olcrk or servant False statenieni by public ofllnor — Fraudulent transfer by a debtor Fraudidcnt falsification of books by a debtor Concealing encumbrances, etc Frauds in rospect of registration of titles Fraudulent sales of real property Fraudulent hypothecation of real pro- perty • ■ Frauilulent seizures of land, in Quebec Fraudulent dealings in mined gold or silver Giving or using false warehouse re- ceipt Disposal of merchandise in fraud of consignees Making false receipts for grain, etc. ■ Unliwfully selling wreck Secreting wreck, or receiving or keep ing it, etc. (4) Buying marine stores from persons under sixteen, (after two other con viction«) Unlawfully applying nnirks to public stores Taking marks from public stores Unlawfidlypiissessing public stores. (5) Receiving regimental necessities- ■ (6) Three years Two years. . .Seven years. PtjmShMKNT. Genl Soven y.-.i -itfence ten y I'hrce years Three 'years.. Three years Six months.. Seven years. Seven years.. Two years Five years Fine .^lfl(K)or live years Tribonal. Five years Seven years Five years Fine $800 and one year I'en years Fine or 2 years, or both Three years. One year. ... One year and $100 fine. One year Two year8 . Three years. Three years- I hree years. Seven years. . Two years... Five years. Two years . Two years. One year. . . Five years. or Quar. Sess. do do do do do do . do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do (1) Art 35i provides that when the value of property stolen ezooeds $200, two yean shall be added to the punishment. (2) R.S.C.c. 31, sees. 97,09. i3) //,., Sees. 100 and 101. (4) This may also bo dealt with summarily, and in that case the penalty is 4400 or six months imprisonment. (5) When Ifhe value of the stores is less than $25, the offence is punishable summarily by a line of $1(10, or six months imprisonment. (6) This may also , be dealt with summarily, the penalty in that case being $40 or six months. 260 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES, FALSE Pretences, etc. (Continued) Art. Ofpbnck- PUNIBHMKNT- Tbibdnal. 391 Receiving neoesaar le from marines or deserters. (1) Receiving a seamen's property, by purchase, exchange or pawn. (2) Conspiring to defraud : Five vea^^ Qenl. or Quar. Sess. t do 392 394 395 .Seven years Three years One vear. do do 396 Fortune-telling, witohoratt, etc do Eobbery and Kxtortion. Akt. 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 OVFENCK. Robbery with 'pounding, etc., or by a person arme i Robbery Assault with intent to rob Stopping mail with intent to rob Compelling execution of documents- . . Sending threatening letter demanding money, etc Demanding with intent to steal Extortion by threats to accuse of capi- tal or infamous offences Extortion by threats to accuse of other offences Life and whipping. Fourteen yean Three years Life Life Punishment. Fourteen years. Two years Fourteen years. Seven years — Tribunal. Qenl. or Quar. Sess. do do do do do do do do Burglary and Housebreaking. A«T. 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 Breaking a church, etc., and commit- ting indictable offence jFourteen years jGenl. or Quar. Sess. Breaking II church, etc., with intent- {Seven years, 2n i offence ' fourteen years I Burglary Life — House breaking Fourteen years. Opprncb. Punishment. Tbibunal. House breaking with intent Breaking shop, etc Breaking shop with intent Entering or being found in a dwelling- bouse, at night Seven vears . Fourteen years. Seven years Being found armed with intent break into a dwelling-house.. . , . . . Being disguised tools to Seven years, 2nd offence fourteen years or having burglars Seven years, 2nd offunoe fourteen years Five years, 2n<l offence fourteen years do do flo do do do do do (1) This may also be dealt with summarily ; penalty $120 or six months. (2) On summary conviction, tbepenalty is $100. INDICTABLE OFFENCES. FOROEBY. 261 Abt. 423 A (a) (6) (c) {ff) («/) (e) (/) (A) (.•) U) m (m) (n) (o) (P) («< (r) <«) («) {«) (r) (le) (X) B (a) (i) C ((a) (d) (e) (/) (ff) (A) (0 ./) i^) (« (m) (n) 425 426 427 42H 429 Offrn'cr. FORGERY :- Of |)abliodooument, (Imperial, Col onial, Dominion or Provinoial). . . Of doc '■mentr of title to land Of registers of title to lands Of land registration doouments .... Of Notarial Acts etc Of register of births, cto Uf copy of register of births, etc. .. Of wills or probates, etc Of transfer of public tunds, etc Of transfer of stocks, etc of transfer in share of crown lands Of power of attorney for transfer of crown lands Of entry in book of shares or stock, etc Of liscnequer bills , Of bank notes, bills of exchange, 6tc Of scrip in lieu of land Of document of title to any public debt Of deed, bond order, etc Of accountable receipt Of bil's of lad'ng. Insur. Policy, etc Of Warehouse Receipt, Dock War rant, etc Of any document relating to registry! of personal property Fourteen years (1) . Of anjf public register, not above mentioned Fourteen years. ... PCNISHMBNT. Life. Life. Life Life. Life Life. Life. Life. Life. Life. Life Life. Life. Life. Life. Life Qenl. Life.. Life.. Life.. Life . Life Of Court Records, Judicial Doou ments, etc regis Of Magistrates' Documents, ters,etc Of Copy Letters Patent, etc Of Marriage Licenses or certificates. Of contracts.. Of powers or letters of attorney Of request for money or goods, etc. Of ac(|uittanoes vouchers, etc Documents to be given in evidence in .iudicial proceedings Of rail way, tratnw'y or steam'r tickets Of any other document Counterfeiting public seals, cto Counterfeiting seals ot Courts, Re- gistries, cto Unlawtully printing proclamations etc Sending fraudulent telegrams in a false name . Sending a false telegram or letter with intent to alarm, etc. Tribunal. Seven years. Seven years. Seven years.. Seven years. Seven years. • Seven years-. Seven years , Seven years.. Seven years.. Seven years Seven years. . Life , Fourteen years. Seven years (2) Two years or Quar. Sess. do do do do do do do do do -lo do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do (1) The Uttering of a forgery is subject to the same punishment as the forgery itself. Code, Art. 424.) (2) Same punishment as for forgery of a document to the same oflfoot as the telegram. ( Art. 262 PRACTICAT, nUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. Prei'arai^ion for Forgery and Offences resembi.ino FoROERY. Abt. Opfr.<ok. PuNISHMINT. Tribunal. 430 431 432 434 43S Receiving or having forged bank- notes Fraudulently malting a document without authority Using a forged will or other instru- ment, or probate, etc., obtained Fourteen years (1) Fourteen years Fourteen years Fourteen years Fourteen years Ten vears do do do Qenl. or Quar. Soss. do CO do do do do do Making, having, or using* etc.) instru- 436 Cniintorf^itincr stamns fito 4.'j7 FalsifvinfiT reiristors 433 438 Falsifying extracts from registers. . . Falsely certifying entries in or ex- tracts from resistera Seven vears 440 Forging certificates, certifying false Two years FourtcPn years Sevpn verm 441 Making false entries in books relat- ing to public funds, etc IssninirfR.lae dividend wnrrsnts . • Forgery of Trade Marks — Fraudulently marking op Merchandise. Akt. Offence. Punishment. J 447 1 Forging a trnde-mark ; or apply- } 460 S ing a forged trade-mark (4) — Two years & forf t of goods 5 jS i iSelling goods falsely marked Two yean & forft. '*'^^ \ ofgoods Selling marked bottles without^ assent of proprietor of trade-Two years & forft, mark (4) ; ofgoods S449| 450 1 Tbibunai.. Limitation. Genl. or Quar. Sess 3 years, do do do do (1) Same punishment as for forgery of the document so fraudulently made without author- ity. (Art. 431.) (2) These may be dealt with summarily ; in which case the punishment is four months im- prisonment, and $10U, fine, as well as forfeiture. INUICTAIJLB OFKENCES. I'EItSONATION. 263 Abt. Opkknc.;. PUNISMMKNT. jt^l i Fraudulent personation Fourteen years 457 Personation at Exatninatioii. ..-■ One year, or $10(1, fine 45H lAokDowledgiDit an instrument in I false name Seven years Tribunal. Qeui. irQuar. Sesci. do do Offknces Relating to the Coin. Art. 462 463 465 466 467 46S 469 470 471 471 471i 47S 474 475 4H0 Counterfeiting (if-^, current gold or silver coin Dealing in or importing counterfeit gold and silver coin ... . Eiporting counterfeit coin Offenck. PUNISVMRNT. Life Life Two years, 2nd offence seven years Life Life Fourteen years. Makinn, buying, or having counter- feiting instruments Bringing coining instruments into Canada Clipping current gold or silver coin. DetacinK current coin and afterwards tendering same ;Ono year, 2nd offence „.,.., 1 seven years, Possessing cuppings of curren.' gold ori silver coin Seven years.2nd offence „ . ^ , I fourteen years, PosseFsing any counterfeit gold or sil-j ver coin, with intent to utter same.. Three years ,2nd offence seven years. Throe years, 2nd offence sevon Tears, Three years. 2nd offence seven years. Possessing three or more oonnterfeit copper coins Counierfeiting current copper coin, or dealing in same, etc Counterfeiting foreign coins or utter- ing same, etc Uttering counterfeit gold or silver coin Uttering light coins, medals, base copper coins, etc •■ Three years, 2nd offence seven years Fourteen yrs, 2d offence life Advertising counterfeit money, oto. . Threeyear8,2nd offence seven years Five years Tbibunal. Qenl. or Quar. do do do do do do do do do do do do do do 264 PRACTICAL OiriDE TO MAOtSTKATKS. MI8MIIEK. Art. 482 483 484 485 4«6 487 488 489 489 490 492 493 494 495 496 496 497 498 499 A (a) (6) (c) Ofkkncs. (rf) B ('.) (ft) C W m (<•) W)l («) I \^>) {0)1 (A) (1) ii' (a) (/') (c) id) (e) 'Arson ; At tempt to oommit arson Setting Ore to crops, eto j Attempt to lire crops, eto Heoklessly settinfc fire to forest, etc., on Crown domain. (1) Seodinit letter threatening to burn buildings, eto Attempt to damage any building, etc, ! by oxplosive:' •• Obstructing a railway in a manner I likely to endiintter property — Ob.<(ructing a railway with intint to I endanger properly Obstructing construction or free use of railway Destroying, damaging, or obstruct- ing telegraphs, telephones, electric lights, tire alarms, eto Wrecking Attempting to wreck Willully altering, removing, or con- oealing marine signals, buo^seto. . Wilfully preventing the saving of a wrecked vessel Wilfully preventing the saving of wreck. (2) Injuring rafts booms, piers, etc — Mischief to mines PUNISHMKNT. Life Fourteen years. Fourteen years- Seven years Two years Ten years Fourteen years. Five years Life Two years. Wilfully damaging a ship, house, eto , and causing daniier tn life Wilfully damaging a river or Fea bank dyke, etc., and raniiino danger of inundation Damaging bridges, viaducts, aque- ducts, etc., and n ndering Kami' or highway or railway, etc .dangrrouH or imiHumahlc Damaging railway with intent to rendir it impaanable Wilfully damaging a ship in distress, eto I Wilfully destroying or injuring cattle by killing, maiming, etc jWilfully damaging ship with intent to render it useless (Wilfully damaging navigation sig- ! n«l, etc Wilfully damaging a river or sea bank, etc Two years Life Fourteen years. Seven years. . Seven years. Twoyeors... 1 wo years.. . Seven years. Life. Life. Life. Life. Fourteen yean. Fourteen years. Seven years. S«ven years. Seven years. Wilfully damaging river or cai,al, private water, etc iSeven years. . Mischief to goods in process of manu-' faoture ISeven years. Misohief to machinery, etc Seven years. . Mischief to hop-binds, ets Seven years.. Mischief to garden trees, etc Five years. , . Misohief to post-letter, letter boxes, po't parcelst etc IFive years... Mischief (by night) to any propertyi worth *an jFive years. ■ • Tbibunal. Genl. or Quar. Scss. do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do (1) This may be dealt with summarily, and, in that ease, punished by fine (W>), or six months imprisonment. (Art. 486, sub. sec. 2.) (2) This IS punishable summarily by fine ($400), or six months imprisonment. INDICTABLE OFFENCES. Mischief. — Continued. 2(i5 Abt. (a) 5110 sol 6<)2 502 504 505 506 508 509 OrFRNCR. MiBobief to any property, worth $20 by day Attempt to maim or kill cattle . . KillitiK. maiming or injuring other animalu after another conviction PuNisnHlNT. Tribunal. Two years 'Oenl. or Qua> . Sess, Two years. Fine, (1) or imprison- ment, (2) or both Two years Written threats to injure cattle.. InjtirinR poll-books, voters' lists and other election dooumenta Seven years. Injuries to building by tenants Five years • Injuring Provincial, Municipal, etc., boundary marks Sevenyears Injuries to other land marks Five years. Injuring trees totheamountof twenty- five cents, alter two other convictions Two years.. Injuring vogetAble productions in gar- dens, etc., after another conviction.. Two years.. do do do do do d* do do do Offences Connected with Trade and Breaches of Contkaot. Art, 620 520 521 521 521 ."123 524 525 526 Offbncr. Pdnishmbnt. Combiriation in restraint of trade (thej offenders being persons) Pino $4000 or two years Combination in restraint of trade (the! offender being a corporation) I Fine $10,000 Criminiil breaches of contract, by per-j sons (3) 1 Fine $100 or 3 months. Criminal breaches of contract byMuni-i oipal Corporations, etc 'Penalty $1001 Criminal breaches of contract by rail-i way companies Penalty $100 Intimidation, by violence, threats of violence, picketting, etc. , (4) Fine $100 or 3 months . Intimidation by assaults, or violenee or threats of violence used in pur- suance of unlawful oombination Two years Intimidation of Wheat Dealera, sea- men, etc, (4) Fine $100 or 3 months. . Intimidation of bidders for public lands Fine $4U0, or two yean i er both TaiBUNiL. ' Sup. Ct. of Cr. Juris. do Genl.or Quar. Se8S> do do do do do do (1) Sec Art. 934, uf the Code, as to regulation of fine. (2) See Art. 951, of the Code. (3) This offence may be prosecuted either by indictment or summarily. (4) These may be dealt with summarily or by indictment. 266 PRACTICAL (lUIDK TO MAdlHTRATES. Attempts — Consi-iraoieh — Accessories. Abt. 627 52H •V20 531 632 OrPRNOK. P(INI8IIHKNT, CongpiraoioR (mil hrrrinhifim pro- vliliil /or) to comiDit iiii indiclnble offence 'Seven years. Attempts {wit hifon: proriilnl for) toi ' commit an indiutable offonco (1) Aoo'ssory alter the Inct to nn indict-! able offence (in runin not priiridiil for) Ollll .(1). Tkiiiiinai.. Oenl. or (Jnar. See*. do do (1) In cases (not otherwiir prorldedfor) of attempts to commiti or of acces8orio<) after the fact to an indictable offence, the punishment will be seven years, when the indictable i>f- luDoe itself is punishable by fourteenyearsor more, (?ode, Articles 52<)and53t),or one half of the loHKcst term of imprisonment for indictable offence itself when such longest term is less than fourteen years, (Code, Articles 52U and 532.) Cases of conspiracy to commit, of attempt to commit or of beinK accessory after the fiiot to an indictable oS'ence are not triable in a Court of Oeneral or Quarter iSessions, unless the offence itself is so triable. (Code, Art. 540.) SI'EEDY TKtALS OK INDICTABLE OFFENCES. 2U7 CHAPTEJi X. {Part Lir of the Code.) Si'KEDY TlUAI.S OF iNDICTAHFiB OFFENCES. 702. A|»pll««tloii, — The proviHioiis of this part do not, apply to tho North- WoHt Torritories or tho District of Keewiitin. 7tt^* ^vaniiiKN of* ('xprvMNioiiM. — In thiH part, uiiIumh the context otherwiHC requires, — (a.) the expression • .hidge ' means ami includes, — (i.) in the pi-ovince of Ontario, any judge of a county court, junior judge or deputy judge authorized to act as chairman of the (ieneral Sessions of the Peace, and also the judges of the pro- visional districts of Algoma and Thunder Bay, and the judge of the district court of Muskoka and Parry Sound, authoi-ized res- pectively to act as chairman of the General Sessions of tho Peace ; (ii.) in the province of Quebec, in any district Avhevein there is a judge of the sessions, such judge of sessions, and in any district wherein there is no judge of sessitjns hut wherein there is a district magistrate, such district magistrate, and in any district wherein there is neither a judge of sessions noi- a district magistrate, the sheriff of such district ; (iii.) in each of the provinces of Nova Scotia, New HKirNswiCK and Prince Edward Island, any judge ot a county court ; (iv.) in the province of Manitoba, the Oiuef Justice, or a j)uisne judge of the Court of Queen's Bench, or any judge of a county court ; (v.) in the province of British Columbia, the Chief Justice or a puisne judge of the Supreme Court, or anj' judge of a county court ; (6.) the expression •' County Attorney " or " Clerk of the Peace " includes, in the Provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island, any clerk of a county court, and, in the Province of Manitoba, any Crown Attorney, the Prothonotary of 18 2().S I'ttACTIOAL GUIDE TO MAOFSTRATES. till' Cniiii of (^neon's Bciicli. and any Doputy ]'volhoiiotaiy there- ot. any (U'|iiity ('k-rU of the l^cacc. ami tho dojnity Clovk of the (rnwii and i'lcas for any district in tlu' said ]trovineo. 7«4. ilii«lu;(> to hv a <'oiii*t of* K«'<*ord. — Tho Judge (sittina; on any trial nndrr this |)art of tho Codo, for all the piir- ]K>si's tlu'rcof and ])roi'i'odings coiuifctrd therewith or relating tlieretn. shall lie a Court of Uee.-rd. and in i^very ])rovinee of Can- ada. E\( Ei'T THE I'HovmcE OF (ii.EBEc. sueh Court (shull be called '• 'The County Court Judge's Criminal Court " of tho county or union iif counties or judicial district in which the same is held. •J. 'I'he record in any sucdi case shall lie tileil among the records of the Court over which the judge pre.sides, and as part of such records. T<>fl> l^itViK'OK ti'iablo iiii<l«'r tliiM part. — Every person ci>mmitted to gaol foi- trial on a charge of being guilt}' of any of the otlences which are mentioned in .section 5;}!). (1) as being within the jurisdiction of the (ieneral (U' (Quarter Sessions of the Peace, may. witii his own consent, (of which consent un entry shall then be nuide of record), and subject to the jirovisions herein, bo tried in any itrovince. under tlie following ]ti'ovisions. out of ses- sions and out of the regular ti-rni or sittings of the Court. Avhether the Court before which, but for suidi consent, the said j)erson would be triable for (he ott'ence charged, or tho (irand .lury there- of, is oi- is not then in session, and if such person is convicted, he may be sentenced by the judge. This Article applii's t') the speedy trial of persmis actually roM- MiTTEn i''oii TiUAi.. ill any ]irovinci' of tlu' Dominion, foi- any of the otiences triable i)efore a (^ourl of <Jeueral or (Quarter Ses.sious. liut Articii' 7S5. post, contains |)rovisions under which j)ersonH chaigeil in Ontahio. with offences, triable at Sessions nniy, — not only after being committed for trial, but evi-n wue.n charoeo witli any such otVence. before a |»olice Magistrate, or before a Stipeiui- iary .Magistratt'. — elect to be tried before such Magistrate. 74><i. nniy ol' Nlioritt' ai'tor coiumittal of a«' <*<IN«'4l. — Every sheritt' shall, within twenty-four hours ai'lei- any (1 ) For Art. 53!), see p. X2, ante. AKRAIGNMENT OP ACCUSED FOK SPEEDY TRIAL. 269 prisoiKi' (liui'gotl. as iilorcsaid. is (.•ouiinitted to gaol foi- trial, noti- fy the jiKlge ill writing that such prisoner is so confined, stating his naiiif and tlic nature of the charge preferred against him, where- upon, witli us little delay as possible, such judge shall cause t lie prisoiu'i- to he hrought before him. 707. .ii*i*aip;iiiii<*iit of aeviiNi'd Itofbre «lii«l)i;e, — Tbe judge, upon having obtained the dejiositions on which the prisoner was so eoinmitted. shall state to him, (a.) that he is charged with the ottence. describing it ; (6.) that he has the option to l)e forthwith tried before such Judge without the intervention of a ■lury. or to remain in custody, oi- under bail, as the Court deci<les. to In' tried in the ordinary way by the Court having criminal jurisdiction. 2. If the prisoner demaiuls !i trial by Jury, the judge shall re- mand him to gaol ; but if lie consents to be tried by the judge, without a Jury, the county solicitor, clerk of the peafce, or other prosecuting otticer shall jirefer the cliargc against him for which he has been committed for trial, and il". upon being araigned upon tbe charge, the jirisoner jileads guilt}', the prosecuting officer shall draw up a record as nearly as may be in one of the foi'ins MM or \X in schedule one of the Code. (1) such plea shall be entered on llu' record, which shall have the same force and eti'ect as if passed by any Court having Jurisdiction to try the otfeiice in the ordinary way. C'owIm. — Article 832 of the Code )>rovides that, upon any per- son being convicted of an indictable ottence, any Court by whicli, and any judge, undtr Part LI V. by whom judgment is pronounced or recorded, ma}', — in addition to sucii sentence as may otherwise be passed,— condemn such person t(, the ])aynient of the whole or any part of the costs or cxpen.ses incurred in and about the jirose- cution and conviction for the offence (d' which he is convicted ; and that the payment of such costs may be ordered to be made out of any monies taken from such |>erson on his apprehension {if such monies ore his oicn) or may be enfin-ced at the instance of any jier- son lialile to pay or who lias paid the same, in the same manner, (1) For Forms MM and NN, see pp, *.»81, and 2H2. post. 270 PRACTICAL (JUIDE TO MAOISTRATES. (Hubjoct to the provisions of" the Codo) as tho payment ofan}- costs ordered to be ]>aid by the Judgment or order of any Court of competent jurisdiction in any civil action oi- jirocceding may be enforced ; that until the rec(/very of such costs and ex]teuses from the person so convicted, or from his estate, the same sliall l)e paid and ])rovided for in the same manner as if this section (S;^2) had not been passed ; and that anj- money recoveird in respect thereof from the person so convicted, or from his estate, shall be a]tplica- ble to the reimbursement of any ])erson or fund by whom or out of which sucli costs and expenses have been paid or deirayed. And it is provided by Article 8;^5 of the Code that any costs order- ed to bo paid. i»y a Court pursuant to the foregoint; provisions shall, in case there is no tariff of fees provided with respect to cri- minal ]»roceedings, be taxed by the proper otticer of the Court ac- cording to the lowest scale of fees allowed in such (\>urt in a civil suit; and that if such Court has no civil Jui'isdiction. the fees shall be those allowed in civil suits in a Supei-ior Court of the province according to the loAvest scale. The provision contained in the above Article, 832. is to the same etfect as the Imperial statute. 3;{-;54 Vict. c. 23, sec. 3. except that the latter oidy applies to treason and felony and not to convictions for mi.sdemeanor : and the Knglish Act does not contain the words. •if such moneys are his own," above italicised. In a case in which a prisoner, anvsted on the 4tli Ajtril. was convicted at the following .May Sessions of the Central Criminal Court, the Court after i)iissing sentence, made under the above provision of the Imperial statute, an order for the payment of the costs of the jtrosecut ion out of the money taken from him at the time of his aiijirehension. On tlic 2-4th of April — between the tinu' of his a])prelu'nsi()n and bis coMviction— he had been adjudged bankru|jt ; and it was held — >vitbout deciding what would have been the case if the nioui'V in question, though in the |)ossession of, had not really belonged to the prisoner, or if the act of bankniptcy had been previous to his apprehension — that the order was valid, on the ground tbaf the subseijuent banki'uptc}- coubl not affect the right of the Crimimd Court to nuike the order, such right having vested at the time of the apprelu'iision and befoi-e the bankruptcv. (1) K. V. Ro»)«r>, -43 L. J. M. C. 17; L. li !) (^ 15. 77. COSTS, COMPENSATION. AND RESTITUTION. 2*71 Article 834 of the Code, provides thtit, if u i»ers(tii convicted on an indictment for assault, whether with or without hatterj- and woundiuij. is ordered to pay costs as provided in section S;>2. lie shall lie lialile uidess the said costs are sooner j)aid, to tliree months' imprisonment, in addition to tlie term of imprisonment, if any. 1o wiiich he is sentenced for the otl'ence, and the court may. by war- rant in writing. onU'r the amount of such costs to he levied by distress and sale of the goods and diattels of tlie ortender. and paid to tiie jirosecutor. and the surplus, if any. arising from sueh MaUi, to the owner : and if such sum is so levicil, the ott'ender .shall be released trom such imprisonmi-nt. 4'oinp«'iiNatioii to lloiiit-Fiilt* Piirc]iaN4>r of* Moloil l*roj»t'rt;|»'. — When any prisoner has been convicteil, cither summarily or otherwise, of any theft or otlierott'ence. includ- ing tlie .stealing or unlawfully obtaining any ])ro))erty. and it ajipeai's to the court by the evidence, that the prisoner sold sneii ])i-operty or part of it to any jierson who Iiad no knowledge that it was stolen or unlawfully obtained, and that money has been taken from the ])ri8oner on his aiiprehension, the court may. on applica- tion of such ]iurchascr and on restitution of the jiropertj' to its owner, ortler that out of the monej" so taken from the prisoner. (*/ it is his), a sum, not exceeding the amount of the proceeds of the sale, be delivered to such purchaser. (Code, Art. 8^7.) KcMtitiitioii ol'Ntol«>ii Pro|»«>rt.y.— Article 8HS of the Code, (as amended by ')(> Vict. c. ;{2). ])rovides that if any person, who is ginlty of any indictabk otfencc in stealing or knowingly receiving any pm])crty. is indicted for such offence by or on behalf of the owner of the pi'operty. or his executoror administrator, and convicted ilu'rcof or is. \inder any of the provisions of the Code relating lo the trial of indictable oticnces. tried before a judge or J\isticc for .such offence and convicted thereof, the ]tro]ierty shall be restored to the owner or his rejtresentativc. By clause 2 of the same Article, it is jirovided that, in every such case, the court or tribunal, before which such person is tried for any such oHencc, shall have power to award, from time to time, writs ' i restitution for the said i)roperly or to order the restitution thereof in a sumnuiry manner ; and that the court or tribunal nniy also, if it sees tit. award restitution of tlu> i)ro])erty taken from the 272 PKACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. prosecutor, or any witness for the prosecution, by such offence, although the. person indicted is not convicted thereof, if the jury declares, as it may do, or if, in case the ottender is tried without a jury, it is proved to the satisfaction of the court or tribunal by Avh9m he is tried, that such property belongs to such prosecutor or witness, and that he was unlawfully deprived oi' it l>y such offence. And clause 3 provides that, if it a])pears, before any award or order is made, that any valuable security has been bona fide paid or dis- charged by any person liable to the paj'ment thereof, or being a negotiable instrument, has been bond fide taken or received by transfer or delivery, b}' any j)erson, for a just and valuable consid- eration, without any notice or without .my reasonable cause to suspect that the same had, by any indictable offence been stolen, or if it appears that the ]»ropert3' stolen has been transfci'red to an innocent purchaser for value who has acquired a lawful title thereto, the court or tribunal shall not award or order the restitution of such security or pi'operty. This third clause makes an exception in favor of an innocent third party who has purchased, for value, the stolen pro]ierty, and who Ms acquired a lawful title thereto, that is, a lawful title accord- ing to the law as to civil rights, of the proviiice where the offence has been committed. For instance, by the law of the Province of Quebec. " If a thing lost or stolen be bought in good faith in a fair or market or at a public sale, or from a trader tlealing in similar articles, the owner cannot i*eclaim it, without rc-iml)ursing to the purchaser the price he has paid for it." and ■• If the thing lost or stolen hv sold under the authority of law. it cannot l>e reclaimed. " (1) The power to award restitution of property undei- the al)Ove Article, 83H, extemls to the proceeds of the pi-operty as well as the property itself Therefore, if the property stolen has been sold before the conviction, an a]ipiication may be made to the court, before which the criminal is convicted, for the restitution of the proceeds, which, if the}' are in the hands of the criminal or of an agent who holds them for hira, should be granted. (2) (1) See Civ. Code L. C, Arts. 14H9, 1490. (2) R. V. .lustices Cent. Crim. Ct, 17 Q. B. D. 598 ; 55 L. J. Q. B., 183 ; Aff. 18 Q. B. D., 314 : 56 L. J. M. C. 25. RE-EI-ECTIN« AFTER COMMITTAL. 2*73 Where, iiftcr the tri.al and conviction of a prisoner for larceny, the judges who presided at the trial ordered property found in his possession, when arrested, to be disposed of in a partic\ilar manner, such property not being part of that stolen nor connected there- with, it was held tluit the order was bad, as the judges had no jur- isdiction t(> make it. (1) Clause 4 of the above article, 838, provides that nothing in that article contained shall apply to the case of any prosecution of any trustee, banker, merchant, attorney, factor, broker, or other agent entrusted with the possession of goods or documents of title to goods, for any indictable ottence uu<ler sections 320 or 363 of the Code. TOH. Pe«HOii« Jointly Acciisefl. — If one of two or more prisoners charged with the same ottence demands a trial by jury, and the other or others consent to be tried by the judge without a jury, the judge, in his discretion, may remand all the prisoners to gaol to UAvait trial by a jury. 70». Klcctioii Alitor Kcl'iiNal to Im> Tried by Jll4l{re.— If under Part LV. (2) or Part LVE. (3) any person has been asked to elect whether he would be tried by the magis- trate or justices of the peace, as the case may, or before a jury, and he Inis elected to bo tried before a jury, and if such election is stated in the warrant of committal for trial, the sheritland judge shall not be required to taice the proceedings directed b}* this part. 2. Hut if such person, after bis said election to be tried by a jury, has been committed for trial, he may, at any time before the regular tonn or sittings of the court at which trial by jury would take |)liU('. n<3tify the sheritf that he desires to re-elect ; where- Mpmi it shall be the duty of the sheritf to proceed as directed by section Tliti. and, thereafter, the person so committed shall be pro- (1) R. V. City of London, E. B. A E. 509; 27 L. .1. M. C. 231 , 1{. v. Pierce, Bell, 235. (2) Part LV. (comprising Articles 782-808) relates to the Snmmary Trial of Indictable Offences. See post, (3) Part LVL (comprising Articles 809-831) relates to the trial of Juvenile Oflenders for Indictable Offences. See post. 274 PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. cooili'd against as if his sai<l eloctioii in (lie tirst instance liad not boon made. 770. C'oKtiiiiiuiKM' of Profe<><liii)rN Before An- other .llld^re. — Proeoodings under this part of the Code com- moneed before any .judge may, where such judge is for any reason unal)le to act. be continued liefore anj' other Judge competent to try prisoners under (his part in the same judicial district, and such las( mentioned judge shall have the same ])OAVi'i's Avith respect to such ]»roceedings. as if such proceedings had been commenced be- fore him. and may cause such ])orti(m of the i)roceedings to be repeated before him as he shall deem neeessary. 771. Kleetioii After Coiiiiiiittal Under Part ■iV. or l^VI.— If. on the trial, imder Part LV. or Part LVI. of the Coile, of any person eharged Avith any otfence triable under the provisions of this part, the nxagistrate or justices of the peace decide not to try the same summarily, but commit such ]>erson for trial, siudi ])erson may. afterwards, with his own consent, be tried under the provisions of this part of the Code. 772. Trial of Ae<^iiNe4l. — If the prisoi\er, upon being so arraigned and consenting as aforesaid, pleads not guiltj^, the judge shall api)oint an early day, or the same day, for his trial, and the county attorney or clerk of the peace shall subpoena the witnesses named in the de])ositions. or such of them and such other witnesses as he thinks requisite to prove the charge, to attend at the time appointed for such trial, and the judge may proceed to try such prisoner, and, if he be found guilty, sentence shall be passed as hereinbefore mentioned ; (I) but if he be found not guilty the judge shall immediately discharge him from custody, so far as res- pects the charge in qtiestion. 773. Trial of Oft'eneeN Other Than Thoive for Whieh A<*enNe<l In Committed. — The county attorney or clerk of the peace or other prosecuting officer may, with the (1) See Art. 767 at p. 269, ante. See pp. 269-270, ante, as to costs, also p. 271, ante, as to comi'knsation to bona fidb i'Urchaser of stolen property, and pp. 271-272, ante, as to restitution of stolen property. TRIAL. 215 consent of the judge, pri'lbr iigiiiiist the priHoner u eharge or charges for any otYonoe or ott'ences. for which he may l)e tried under the ])rovisions of this part, other than tlie charges for \vhi« li he has been conuuitted to gaol for trial, although such eharge or charges do not appear, or are not mentioned, in the depositions upon which tlie prisoner was so committed. It seems, however, that when other charges than those for wliieh the accused has hcen e(nnmitte(i for trial are ])referred against him. his consent to a spee<ly trial of .such other charges must be shown. Thu.s, in a case where some ])risoners were chaiged with having defrauded the ])rosecutor by means of the tliree-card monte game, they consented to be tried sumnmrlly. When thej' were In'ought up for trial, the Crown aUorney applied for and obtained leave to substitute a charge of coml)ining to obtain money by false pretences ; but the i)risonei"s objected. The trial was then pro- ceeded with, withont the consent of the prisoners to be tried summai'ily for this substituted otfence being obtained. And. upon error brought, it was held tliat the consent of the prisoners to be summarily tried on the substituted charge should distinctly ap- pear, and that, by reasim of its absence, the conviction was bad. (1) 774. Powers of Jud^^e. — The judge shall, in any case tried before him. have the same ]H)wer as to acquitting or convict- ing, or convicting of any other otfence than that cliarged, as a jury would have in case the ])ri8oner were tried at a sitting of any court mentioned in this ]iart, and may render any verdict which may be rendered by a jxiry upon a trial at a sitting of any such court. By Article 711 of the Code, (wliich, together with Articles 712 and "ilH. post, will, under the terms of the above Article 774, apply to "Speedy trials of Indictable Ott'ences"), it is provided that when (he complete commission of tlie otfence charged is not jiroved, but the evidence establishes an attempt to commit the oti'ence, the accused may be convicted of such attempt. And Article 712 provides that when an attempt to commit an otfence is charged, but the evidence establislies the commission of the full otience, the accused shall not be acquitted, but may be convicted (1) Goodman v. R. 3 Ont. Rep. 18. 276 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. of the attempt, or the court may, in its dist'rctioii. direct such per- Hon to be indicted for the complete otfence ; but it also provides that after a conviction for such attempt the accused shall not be liable to be tried again for the olfence which he was charged with attempting to commit. Artidle 713 of the Code provides that if the commission of the offence charged against the accused includes the commission of any other offence the person accused may be convicted of any offence so included which is proved, although the whole offence charged is not proved, or he may be convicted of an attempt to commit any ott'ence so included. This article follows the common law rule (now con.siderably ex- tended by the abolition of the distinction between fehmies and misdemeanors"), under which it is not necessary to prove, to the full extent laid, the offence charged in the indictment. ])rovided the facts actually proved constitute an offence punishable by law, and for which the defendant may by law be convicted on that in- dictment. (1) Under this rule, if, upon a charge of burglary and stealing goods, there be no burglary but only stealing proved, or, if upon an indictment for robbery there be proof of the stealing of the property but not that it was taken from the person by violence or putting in fear, the prisoner may be convicted of the simple theft. (2) Indeed, upon an indictment for burglary and stealing, the prisoner may be conviced either of burghuy,, of entering a dwelling-house in the night with intent to commit an indictable offence therein, of houisebreaking, of stealing in a dwelling-house to the amount of $25 (if the property stolen be laid in the indict- ment to be of that value), or simply of theft, according to the facts proved. (3) Ui)on a charge of assaulting and unlawfully wounding and ill- treating the prosecutor, and thereby occasioning him actual bodily (1 ) B. V. HoUiugberry, 4 B. & C. 330 ; R, v. Hunt., 2 Camp. 583 ; R. v. Williams, 2 Camp. 246. (2)2 Hale, 203. (3) R. V. Compton, 3 C. & P. 418 ; R. v. Bollock, 1 Moo. C. V. 423 ; R. v. Brookes, C. & Mar. 543. POWERS OF JUIXJE IN SPEEDY TRIALS. 277 hiiriii, the (leJendiint may be eonvicted of a coinmon assault. (1) Upon an indictment for conspiring to prevent workmen from continuing worli, it is sutttcient to prove a conspiracy to prevent one. workman from working. (2) Where two intentions are ascribed to one act — as that an assault was committed on a female with intent to nhise and to camallif know her — proof of either of the intentions a8cril)ed will be suf- ficient. (S) Upon a charge of stealing, if any one of the articles enumerated in the charge be proved to have been stolen by the defendant, it will be sufficient. (4) Upon an indictment for extortion, alleging that the defendant extorted twenty shillings, it was held sufficient to prove that he extorted one shilling. (5) On a charge of obtaining money by false pretences, proof of part of the pretence alleged was held sufficient where the money was obtained upon that pai't of the pretence which was proved. (G) Where several are indicted for burglary and theft, one may be found guilty of the burglar} antl stealing, and the others of the stealing only. (7) View. — Article 732 of the Code, i)rovides that on the trial of any person for an offence against the Code, the court n\ay direct that the Jury shall have a view of any place, thing or ])ci"sf)n. But it does not apj)ear to empower the taking of such a view by the court or judge in the case of a trial without a jury. Thus, where upon an indictment for unlawfully displacing a railway switidi. a prisoner was tried without a jury by a county couTt Judge, exercising jurisdiction under the '• Speedy Trials Act,'' (1) R. V. Oliver, Bell, l.\S7 ; 80 L. J. (M. C.) 12 ; R. v. Yeadon, L. i<c C 81 ; :n L. .1. (M. C.) 70. (2) R. V. Bykerdike, 1 M, & R. 179. (3) R. V. Evans, 3 Stark, 35; R. v. Dawson, 3 Stark, 62. (4) 2 Hale, 302. See R. v. EUins, R. & R. 188. (5) R. V. Biirdett, 1 Ld. Raym. 149. See R. v. Carson, R. & R. 303. (6) R. V. Hill, R. & R. 190. (7) R. V. Butterworth, R & R. 520. 278 PRACTICAr. OUIDK TO MAdlSTHATES. and ut'ter hearing the ovidonci- and tin* addresHOs of couhhoI, tho judgi' iVHi'VVt'd his decision, and. tiion, lielbiv giving it, having occasion to pass the |)laci'. he examined the switch in qnestioii, ni'itlier tlie prisoner nor anj' one on ins beliaif ijeing present, and tiie prisoner was fonnd guilty ; — it was lield that there was no avithoritj' for the judge taking a vieiv of the place, and that even if he had the right to take the view, tlie manner of his taking it, without the i)resence <>i' the prisoner or of any one on his l)ehaH". was unwarranted, and, further, that the question whether the judge had the right to take a view was a question of law arising on the trial and was a proper question to reserve under the J{. S. C.,c. 174, sec. 25!t, (1) KeNorviiii; <|H<'NtioiiN of Iwiw. — Article 74H provides as follows : 1. The coui-t before wliich any accused person is tried maj-', either during or after the trial, reserve an^ </Mes?ion of iau; arising either on the trial or on any of the proceedings ^jreijwimary. subsequent, or incidental thereto, or arising out of the direction of the judge, for the opinion of the Court of Appeal in numner hereinafter pro- vided. , 2. Either the prosecutor or the accused may, during the trial, either orally or in writing, apply to the court to reserve any such question as aforesaid, and the court, if it refuses so to reserve it. shall nevertheless take a note of such objection. 3. After a question is reserved, the trial shall proceed as in other cases. 4. If the result is a conviction, the court may, in its discretion, respite the execution of the sentence, or postpone .sentence till the question reserved has been decided, and shall in its discretion com- mit the jjerson convicted to prison or admit him to bail, with one or two sufficient sureties, in such sums as the court thinks fit, to surrender at such time as the court directs. 5. If the question is reserved, a case shall be stated for the opinion of the Court of Appeal. (1) R. V. Petrie, 20 Ont., Rep. 317. I'llOCKSS (IK AMBNI>MKNT. KTC. 27!> Appeal ivlien 4|ii(<«Ntion not K<>MC>rv«>d. — If tho court rct'nsos to ivMorv*' the question, tlio i'ahty amm.yino may, with the leave, in writing, of the Attorney-lieneral, move the Oourl of Appeal, after notiee to the accused or 1'Roseci;toh, as tlie ease may be, for K-ave to appeal ; and, if leave to ap|)eal is granted, a case shall l»e stated for tlie oiiinion of the Court of Appeal as if the question had been reserved. (Code, Art. 745.) 7T5. A«1iiliNNioil to Ball. — If a prisoner elects to be tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury, the judge may, in his discretion, admit him to bail to appear for his trial, and extend the bail, from time to time, in case the court bo adjourned or there is any other reason therefor ; and such bail may be entered into and perfected before the clerk. 77«S. Bail In Vane ofKlcction of Trial by Jury. — If a prisoner elects to be tried by a jury, the judge may, instead of remanding him to gaol, admit him to bail, to appear for trial at such time and place and before such court as is determined upon, and such bail may be entered into and perfected before the clerk. T77. Acljonrnincnt. — The judge may adjourn any trial from time to time until finally terminated. 77H. Powers of Antendniont. — The judge shall have all powers of amendment which any court mentioned in this part would have if the trial was before such court. Article (>29 of the Code, provides for the amending of defects apparent upon the face of an indictment when attacked by demurrer or motion to quash ; and Article 723 of the Code provides for the making of amendments when there are variances between the cliiirge as laid in the indictmeut and the evidence given on the trial. (1) 77SI. Kccoicnixanee to Proweente or f^iw Evid- cnee. — Any recognizance taken under section 598 of the Code, for the purpose of binding a prosecutor or a witness, shall, if the (1) For these Articles 029 and 723, and full comments anc' -xuthorities there- on, see Crankshaw's Cr. Code, pp. 591-592 and 054-()56. 280 I'RACTtOAI, milDK TO MACIISTKATKS. ])(>rH()H CDininiKcil lor trial elects to !»' tried iiinler tlie |ii'ovisiitiirt of this |iurt, lie oldiii'iitory on eaeli of tlu' persons liound tliei'el)y, us to all tilings tlierein mentioned with rei'ei'eneo to 1 lie trial hy t lie Jii(li;e under tiiis part, as if siieli recoifiiizanee had lieen oviji^- inally entered into for the doing of such things with ivference to such trial : I'rovided, that at leaht furty-eiuut hours notice fn witiTiNd suALi, HK (iiVEN, either personally or hy leaving the sumo at the \ilaee of residence of the* persons hound hysuch recognizance as therein descrihed. to appear hoforc the judge at tlio place whoro such trial is to Ik- had. 7M4K Witii«'MN4'N to iittoud tliroii)r|ioiit trial. — Kvery witness, wluitheron lu'half of the prisoner or a|^ainst hiju. duly suninioned or suh[Meiuied to attend and give evidence before such Judge, sitting on any such trial, on the day ai)pointed for the same, shall he bound to attend and remain in attendance through- out the trial ; and if he fails so to attend he shall be held guilty of contempt of cour., and may be pi-occeded against therofoi- accord- ingly. 7HI, ('oiiipc'lliiiK att«>iidaii<*« of l¥itii('NN<'N. — Upon proof to the satisfaction of the judge of the sei'vice of sub- jidMia u]>on any witness who fails to attend before him as required by such suhpd'iui, and upon such Judge being satistied that the presence of such witness before him is indispensuble to the ends of justice, he may. by his wai'rant. cause the said witness to be a]>pre- hended and forthwith brought before him to give evidence as re- quired Ijy such subpcena, and to answer for his disregard of the same ; m\t\ such witness may he detained on such warrant before the said Judge, or in the common gaol, with a view to secure his presence as a witness ; or, in the <liscretion of the Judge, such wit- ness may be released on i-ecognizance, with or without sureties, conditioned for his api)earance to give evidence as therein men- tioned, and to answer for his defa\Ut in not attending upon the said subptena. as for a contempt ; and the Judge may, in a sum- mary manner, examine into and dispose of the charge of contempt against the said witness, who, if found guilty thereof, may be lined or imprisoned, or both, such tine not to exceed one hundred dollars, and such imprisonment to be in the common gaol, with or without FORMS. 281 hard liilxjur. and not to oxfoed the toriii of ninety diiyn. and ho may alsct lu> oi'di'red to pay tho costs incniont to tlu* execution (d" such warrant and of his detention in custody. 2. Sucli warrant may l)e in the form 00 (1) and the conviction for contempt in the form I'P in schedule one of tlie ('o(U>, (2) and tiio same shall be autliority to tho persons and otttcers therein re- quin d to act to do as therein they arc respectively directed. K()i{.Ms rxhKij I'Airr lit of the'cobk. At MM.— (Section H]1.) PiiltAC or IIECOHO v'.IIEN THE I'KISONER PI-EAnS NOT GUILTY. ( 'anada. Province of County of :! Be it remembered that A. B., being a ]»risoner in the gaol of the said county, committed for trial on a charge of having on the day of , in the year , stolen, &c. (one cow, the property of ('. C. or as the case may be, stairng briefly the offence) and having been brought before me (describe the Judge) on tho day of , in the year , and asked by mo if he consented to be tiied before me without the in- tervention of a jury, consented to bo so tried ; and that upon tho day of , in the year , the siiid A. B.. being again brought before me for trial, and declaring liinisolf ready, was arraigned upon the said charge and pleaded not guilty ; and after hearing the evidence adduced, as well in support of the said charge as for the prisoner's defence (or as the case may be). I find him to be guilty of the olt'ence with which he is charg- ed as aforsaid, and I accordingly sentence him to (here insert such sentence as the law allows and the Judge thinks right,) (or I find him (1) For Form 00, see p. 283, pott. (2) For Form PP, see p. 284, pott. 282 PRACTICAL (It'IDE TO MAGISTRATES. not guilty of the offonco with which \w is riiargod. and discharge him accordingl}'.) Witness my hand at , in the county of , this day of , in tho year O. K.. yi^i.— {Section 7ti7.) POR.M (IK KECORO WHEN THE I'RFSONKR PLEADS OflLTY. Canada. Province of County of :! Be it rememhoi'cd that A. B.. heing a prisoner in the gaol of* the said county, on a charge of having on the (Uiy of i \ the year , stolen. &c., {one cow, the property of C. D.. or as the case may be, stating briefly the offence), and l)eiiig hrought be- fore nu' (describe the Juittje) on the day of in the year . and asked in' me if he consented to he tried Itefore me without the intervention of a .huy. consented to he so tried ; and that the said A. B., Ijcing then arraigned upon the said ( harge. he jdeack'd guilty thereof, whereupon I sentenced the said A. B, to {Itere insert such sentence as the law <dlous and the Judge thinks right.) Witness my hand this »hiy of , in the 3'ear O. K.. Judge. FORMS. 283 OO.— (Section 781.) WARRANT TO AIMMIKHENH WITNESS. CailiUlil, 1 I'roviiu'o of , > County of . > To all or uny of tho constables and other peace officiTs in the .said county of Whereas, it haviiiL' l)eon made to ajiju-ar before nie. tliat E. F., of . in the said county of , was likely to give material e\ndenee on behalf of the ]irosecution {or defence, an tfus case may be) on the trial of a certain charge of (theft, or as the case may be), against A. B., and that the said H. V. was duly sub- jxened {or bound under recognizance) to appear on the day of . in the j'ear , at in the said county at oclock (forenoon or afternoon, as the case mai/ be), before nie. to testify what he knows concerning the said charge iigainst tlu' said A. B. And whereas, proof has this day been made before me. ujion oath of such subpiena having been duly served upon the said E. F.. {or of the said K. K.. liaving been duly bound under recognizance to appear before me, as the case may he); ami whereas the said K. F. has neglected to appear at the trial and place appointed, and no just excuse has been otfcreil for such neglect : These are therefore to command you to take the said K. K. and to bring him and have him forthwith before me. to testify what he knows concerning the said charge against the said A. B., and also to answer his contempt lor such neglect. (iiven under my hand, this day of . in tlie year (). K.. Judge. ll> 284 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. Vl\ — (SertirMlSl.) .; ; V CONVICTION FOR CONTEMPT. raiiinlii. "^ . ■ V l'ri>viiict' ol' . > ( 'cuiily of \j ■ ' , ; ■ ^; Hi' it rt'iiu'iiihcrcd tliiit on tlie day of in tin- year . in tlu' oouiitj- of , E. F. is convicted before mo. for that he the said E. F. did not attend lieforo me to jujive evidence on tiie trial of a certain ciiarge ai^-ainst one A. H. of (theft, or as the case may be). aithoii<rh duly sujKcnacd (or l)onnd by recognizance to a])pear and give evidence in that behalf, as the case mail he) but made default thci'cin. and has not shown before mo any sutticiont excuso'for siu-h default, and J adjudge the said H. F.. for his said otfence. to be imprisoned in the common gaol of the county of . at , for the s])ace of . there to be ke])t at hard labour (and in case a fine is also intended to be imposed, then proceed.) and I also adjudge that the said K. F. do forth- with pay. to and for the use of Her Majesty, a tine of dollars, and in default of ])ayment. that the said tine, with the cost of collec- tion, be levii'd by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said iv F. (or in case a fine alone is imposed then the clause of imprison- ment is to be omitted.) (liven under my hand at . in the said county of , the day and year first above mentioned. (). K.. Judge. ADDITIONAL FORMS. 285 A1)])ITIUXAL FOEMS. ACCUSATION. Ill the ("ounty Court Judge's (■rimiiial (Vjurt for tlu' county ftf [or •■ Fn tlu' Court of tho Judge of sessions of the |jcLi(c t'T tlir district id' ,^ ") Canada. ) The day of Province of ^ ; ^ V ^ : ,. " ; ^ A. D. 18i> , at ('ountv of ■ ' : , J' ' ' i" the countv (or distrirt) of hefore h]s([uirc. ('ouuty .ludgc of tlic saidicounty (or Judije of the sessions of the peace for the said district) exercising crimiiud jurisdiction uniler the provi.sions of Part LIV of the (Viminal Code, relating to the Si)ee(ly Trials of Indictabk'Otfences, A. B. who is committed for trial to tlu' common gaol of the said c(uinty (or district), and is now a jjrisoner in clo.se custody therein, stands charged this day. before tlie said judge, sitting in open court assemhled for the trial of the said \. 15.. as follows: FIRST coiNT. for that he the said A. \i.. on the day of , in the year A. D.. ISO , at did (svf out the o{f>nce to be charjjed in the first count.) SKCOND COINT, and for that, he, the said A. li., on the day and year last aforesaid at aforesaid did {set out the offfnce to be charqed in th'- second count.) .T.N. County attorney, county of (or clerk of the peace, district of ). A. B.. within (orab'/ve) named, upon the within (nv above) charge licing rea<l to him by the judge in open court, and being informed l)V the judge that he has his opti»m either of being forthwith tried without the intervention of a jury upon the .said (diarge, or of remaining untried until the next court of Oyer and Terminer of this county (or district), consents to be now tried uiion tlu said (barge, by the .saiil judge, witluuit a juiT. and the jirisoner i)leads not guilty to the said charge. 286 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. SHERIFFS NOTICE. To llis Honor tlio County .hulge of (or (he Judge of sessions of the peace for ) Pursuant to Article 76() of tlio Criniiniil Code roliitin<;- to the Speedy Trials of Indietable oH'cneiss, J. sherili" of the said county (or district) certify that the several per- sons whose names are mentioned in the first column of tlu^ schedule hereunder Avritten were committed for trial to the common giiol of the said county (or district), and were received by the gaoler of the said gaol on the days severally mentionetl in the second column of the said schedule, opposite the names of the said persons respec- tively, anil were so committed to gaol and severally received under and by virtue of a warrant from charged with the commission of indictable ottences triable at a ('ourt of (ieneral or Quarter Sessions of the peace, and that the nature of the chai'ge against each of the said persons is set forth in the third column of the siiid schedule opposite each of the names of the said several persons. SCHEDULE AHOVK KKFERHED TO. Name of Prisoner. A. B CD E.F T i m e w h e n c o lu- mitted fur trial. iNature of charge as contained in the warrant of commitment for trial. (Signed) X. Y., Sheritfof the county (or district) of SUMMARY TRIAL OF INDICTABLE OFFENCES. 287 CIIAPTl^i XL . (Part LV. of the Code.) - , ,. • Summary Trial of Indictable Offences. 7H*2' 0<'lillitloils.— Ill this |)ai't, mik'ss the contoxt other- wise requires, (a) the ex])res8ion • Mai^istrate "' means iivul ineludes — (i.) ill the proviiues of Ontario. (iiEHEc and Manitoba, any reeorder. Judye of a ('oiuity Court, lieiiig- a justice of the peace, coiuinissioiier of police, judye of tlie Sessions of the Peace, pohce inau;is(rate. district magistrate, or other functionaiy or tribunal,' iiivesled liy tlie proper legislative authority with power to do alone such acts as an usually requireil to he done hy two or more justices of the peace, and acling within the local limits of his or its jurisdiction : (li.) ill the provinces of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, any recorder, judge of a (^)unty Court, stipendiarj' magistrate or ]»olice magistrate, acting within the local limits of his jurisdiction, and any commissioner of ])olice and any functionary, tribunal or jursoii invested by the |)roper legislative authority with power to do alone such acts as are usually required to be done by two or more justices of the peace ; (iii.) in the ])rovinces of Prince Kdward Island and Uhitisii Columbia and in the district of Keewatin, any two justices of the [leace sitting (ogether. and any functionary or tribunal luiving the ])owers of two justices of the peace ; (iv.) in the North-west Territories, any judge of the Su- |)reme Coui't of the said territories, any two justices of the peace sitting together, and any functionary or tribunal having the powers of two justices of t lie peace ; (6) the expression ''the common gaol or other place of confine- ment." in the case of any otfender whose age at the time of his conviction does not, in the oiiinion of the nmgistrate, exceed sixteen yeai's, includes any reformatory prison provided for the reception 288 PKACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. of juvenile offenders in the provim-e in which the conviction re- ferred to takes place, and to which by the law of that province the offender may be sent ; and (c) the expression ••proj)erty '" includes everything included under the same expression or under the expression " valuable security," as detined by the Code, and in the case of any '-valuable security ' the value thereof shall be reckoned in the manner prescribed in the Code. 7M». OftencoN to hv l>ealt With Under ThiN Part. — Whenever any pei'son is charged bei'oi-e a magistrate, (a) with having committed theft, or obtained money or prop- erty by FALSE PRETENCES, or Unlawfully received stolen prop- erty, and the value of the property alleged to have been stolen, obtained or received, does not, in the judgment of the magistrate, exceed ten dollars ; or (6) with having attempted to commit theft ; or (c) Avith having committed an aggravated assault by unlaw- fully and maliciously inflicting upon any other person, either with or without a Aveapon or ijistrunient, any grievous bodih' harm, or by unlawfully and maliciously wounding any other person ; oi" (d) with having committed an assault upon any female what- soever, or u]»on an}' male child whose age does not. in the opinion of the magistrate, exceed fourteen years, such assault being of a nature wliich cannot, in the opinion of the magistrate, be suf- ficiently punisiied l)y a summary conviction before him under any other part of this act, and such assault, if upon a fenuile, not amounting, in his opinion, to an asuault with intent to commit a rape ; or *•''■*■■■■■. / (e.) with having assaulted, obstructed, molested or hindered any peace officer or I'UBLir servant in the lawful performance of his duty, or with intent to |)revent the ])erformance thereof ; ov (/.) with keeping or being an in.mate or habitual frequenter of any disorderly house, house of ill-fa.me or hawdy-house ; or ; (g.) with using or knowingly allowing any part of any premises under his control t(j be used — WHEN THERE IS ABSOLUTE JURISDICTION. 28!» (i.) for the purpose of RBCORDINQ or registering any bet or WAGER, or SELLING ANY POOL ; or (ii.) KEEl'INO, EXHIBITING, Or EMPLOYING, or KNOWINGLY ALLOW- ING to bo kept, exhibited or eini)loyed, any device or a]>paratus for the purpose of recording or registering any bet or wager, or SELLING any POOL ; Or (h.) becoming the custodian or depositary of any money. ]»rop- erty, or valuable thing staked, wagered or ])ledged ; or (i.) recording or registering any bet or wager, or selling any pool, upon the result of any political or municipal election, or of any race, or of any contest or trial of skill or endurance of man or beast, — The Magistrate may, subject to the provisions hereinafter made, hear and determine the charge in a summary way. tH-i. When ^ai^iMt rnte Hliall liavo abwoliitc •luriMlic^tioil. — The jurisdiction of such Magistrate is ABSO- LUTE in the case of any person chargeil with keeping or being an INMATE or HABITUAL FREQUENTER of any DISORDERLY HOUSE. HOUSE OF ILL-FAME or BAWDV-iiousE, and does not depend on the consent of the person charged to be tried by such Magistrate, nor shall such person be asked whether he consents to be so tried ; noi- do the provisions of this part affect the absolute summary jurisdiction given to any Justice or Justices of the Peace, in any case l)y any other }>art of the Code. 2. The jurisdiction of the Magistrate is absolute in the case of any person who. being a seafaring person and only transiently in Canada and having no permanent domicile therein, is charged, either within the city of (Quebec as limited for the purpose of the police ordiiumce, or within the city of Montreal as so limited, or in any other seaport, city or town in Canada where there is such Ma- gistrate, with the commission therein of any of the offences HEKEINBEPOHB MENTIONED, and also in the case of any other person charged with any such oftence on the complaint of an}' such sea- faring person whose testimony is essential to the i)roof of the of- fence ; and such jurisdiction does not depeiul on the consent of any such person (o be tried by the Magistrate, nor shall such person be asked wliether he consents to be so tried. 290 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. 8. Tho jurisdiction of ii Sti|H'iKliary Magiisf nilo in tho province of Prince Kuward Islano. and of a .Matjistrato in the district of Keewatin. under tliis part, is ai)solute. without tlic consent of the person charged. 7.H3. Niiiiiiiinr,v trial iii certain eaMVN, in On- tario. — If any person is ciiaroeu, in the province of t)NTARio, before a Police ^Fagistrate or Itefore a Stipendiary Magistrate, in any county, district or provisiouid count}' in sucli province, with having committed any offence for which he may be tried at a Court of (teneral Sessions of the Peace, or if any person is COMMITTED To A uAOL in the county, district or ])rovisional county, under the warrant of any Justice of the Peace, for trial on a charge of being guilty of any such otfence, such person may, with his own consent, be tried before such Magistrate, and may, if found guilty, be sentciu-ed by the ^lagistrate to the same punishment as he would have been liable to if he had been tried before the (Jourt of (xeneral Sessions of the Peace. 7H6. Proct'«Mliii^;!« on arraign in cut ol* aociiNCMl. — "VVlienever the ^lagistrate, before whom any person is (diarged as aforesaid, ])roposes to disi)ose of the case summarily, under the provisions of this part, such Magistrate, after ascertaining the na- ture and extent of the charge, but before the formal examination of the witnesses for the prosecution, and before calling on the per- son charged for any statement which he wishes to make, shall state to such ])erson the substance of the charge against him, and (if the charge is not one that can ha tried summarily without the con- sent of the accused) shall then say to him these words, or words to the like effect ; "' Do yoii consent that the charge against you shall be tried by me, or do you desire that it shall be sent for trial by a .lury at the (naming the court at which it can probably soonest be tried) ; " and if the person charged consents to the charge being summarily tried and determined as aforesaid, or if the power of the Magistrate to try it does not depend on the consent of the ac- cused, the ^lagistrate shall reduce the charge to wi'iting and read the same to such person, and shall then ask him whether he is guilty or not of such charge. If the person charged confesses the charge the Magistrate shall then proceed to pass such sentence PUNISHMENT ON SIMMAKV CONVICTIONS. 2!>1 Upon him as by law may lu' passed in ivsjKiet to siu-ii offcnco, sub- ject to the provisions ot this Act ; but if the jtcrsun charged says that he is not guilty, the Magistrate shall then examine the wit- nesses for tin' |)rosecution. and when the examination has been (■om[ileted. the .Magistrate shall inquire of the person charged whet- her he has any defence to make to such charge, and if he states that he has a defence, the Magistrate shall hear such defence, and shall then |)roceed to dispose of the case summarily. 7S7. PiiiiiNliinciit for 4H'rtaiii oft«'ii«>i>N under tlliN part* — In the case (dan ottencc charged under ])aragraph (a) or (6) of section 7H;{, the .Nfagist rate, after hearing the.wholc ca.se for the ])r().secution and for the defence, shall, if he tinds the charge proved, convict the j)er.s()n charged and commit him to the common gaol or other place of confinenuMit, there to be imprison- ed, with or without hard labour, for any term not exceeding six MONTHS. 7MH. 1*11 niMli III cut for certain other oftViiecN — In any ease summarily tried under paragraph (c). (d). (e), (/), (y). (h) or (e) of section 7S3. if the Magistrate tinds the charge ])roved. he may convict the perscm charged and commit him to the common gaol or other place of continenu'nt. there to be imju-isoned, with or without hard lab(uu\ foi- any term not exceeding six MONTHS, or nui}- condemn him to pay a tine not exceeding, with the costs in the case, one hundred dollars, or to both tine and im])rison- ment not exceeding the said sum and term ; and such tine nuiy be levied l)j- warrant of distress under the hand and seal of the Ma- gistrate, or the person ccmvicted may be condemned, in addition to any other imprisonment on tlu' sanu' conviction, to be committed to the common gaol or other place of continement for a further term not exceeding six months, unless such tine is sooner paid. The Magistrate nniy, in addition to any sentence imposed upon the pei-son convicted, require him forthwith to enter into his own recognizance, or to give security tt) keep the peace and be of good behaviour for any term not exceeding two years. (Code, Art. 958.) Instead of at once sentencing a person convicted op a first of- fence the 31 agist rate may direct him to be released on entering into a recognizance to keep the peace and be of good behaviour 292 I'RACTXCAL GUIDE TO MAGISTKATES. and to appear and rocoivo Judgment when called upon, if it appears to the Magistrate that, i-egard beinjf had to tlie youth, character and antecedents of the offender, to the trivial nature of the otfenco and to any extenuating circumstances under which the otfenco was committed, it is advisable to so release him on probation of good conduct. (Code, Art. St71.) 7M9. Proi'cefliiiKN for Ofl'e»<*i'M in KPNpc<*( of* Property Worth Over Ten Dollars.— When any person is charged before a magistrate with theft or with having obtained property by false pretences, or with having unlawfully received stolen property, and the value of the property stolen, obtained or received exceeds ten dollars, and the evidence in support of the prosecution is, in the opinion of the magistrate, sufficient to put tht pei-son on his trial for the offence charged, such magistrate, if the case appears to him to be one which may properly be disjiosed of in a summary way, and may be adequately punished by virtue of the powers conferred by this part, shall re- duce the charge to writing, and shall read it to the said person, and, unless such person is one who can be tried summarily without his consent, shall then put to him the question mentioned in sec- tion TSC), and shall explain to him that he is not obliged to plead or answer before such magistrate, and that if he does not plead or answer before him, he will be committed for trial in the usual course. 7SIO. PunlNlinient on Plea ol' Unilty in Mueh C'aNe. — If the person charged as mentioned in the next preceding section consents to be tried by the magistrate, the magistrate shall then ask him whethoi be is guilty or not guilty of the charge, and if such person says that he is guilty, the magistrate shall then cause a plea of guilty to be entered upon the proceedings, and sentence him to the same punishment as he woiUd have been liable to if he had been convicted upon indictment in the ordinary Avay ; and if he says that he is not guilty, the magistrate shall pi-oceed as provided in section 78G. 701. 9laKiHtrate Hay Oeeiile not to Proeeed Nuntinarily. — If, in any proceeding under this part, it ap- pears to the magistrate that the offence is one which, owing to a ELECTION OF TRIAL BY JURY. 293 prckvious conviction of the porson charged, or from any other circumstanceK, ought to be made thi^ Hubject of jiroHecution by indictment rather than to be disposed of Hunimarily. such magis- trate may, before the accused ])erson has made his defence, decide not to adjudicate summarily upon the case ; but a previous con- viction shall not prevent the magisti-ate from trying the offender summarily, if he thinks fit so to do. ■7 OS. Klcc^tlon of Trial hy Jury to hv Ntatvd on Warrant of* Coniniital. — If, when his consent is necessary, the person changed elects to be tried before a Jury, the magistrate shall proceed to hold a prelimiiuiry inquiry as |)rovided in Parts XL IV. and XLV of the Code, ante, and if the person charged is committed for trial, shall state in the warrant of com- mittal the fact of such election having been made. TiKi, Full I>et*en«!e Allowed. — In every case of sum- mary proceedings under this part, the person accused shall be allowed to make his full answer and defence, and to have all wit- nesses examined and cross-examined by counsel or solicitor. 7114. Proeeedlnus to be In Open C'ourt. — Kvery court held by a magistrate for the purpose, of this part shall be an open public court. 7)15. Procuring Attendance of WitneNNCN. — The magistrate before whom any person is charged under the pro- visions of this part, may, by summons, require the attendance of any person as a witness upon the hearing of the case, at a time and place to be named in such summons, anil such magistrate may bind, by recognizance, all persons whom he considers necessary to be examined, touching the matter of such charge, to attend at the time and place appointed by him and then and. there to give evi- dence upon the hearing of such charge ; and if any person so summoned, or required or bound as afoi-esaid, neglects or refuses to attend in pursuance of such summons or recognizance, and if proof is made of such person having been duly summoned as here- inafter mentioned, or bound by recognizance as aforesaid, the magistrate before whom such person should have attended may issue a warrant to compel his appearance as a witness. 2!)4 PRACTICAL aUIDE TO MAOISTItATES. 7»»«. N«'rvi«*i' ol* NiiiiiiiioiiN.— Kvuiy Hummoiis inHucd under tlio provisions of tliis juirt nmy Iw sorvi'd by dolivorin^ u copy of till' suniinons lo the person suninioiu'd, or l)y delivering a eopy of the sunnnous to some inniute of sueh person's iisual jduce of altode apparently over sixteen years of aye; and evi-ry |)erHon so recpiired l»y any writing under the hand of any magistrnto lo attend and give evidence as aforesaid, shall he deemed to have been duly summoned. As to service of summons, see comments at [>]>. 108 and 19H, anf'-. 7f»T. l>l»illiN«ul of <liar|t;i'. — Whenever the magistrate finds the ottence not prove<l, he shall dismiss the charge, and make out and deliver to the person charged a certificate under his hand stating the fact of such dismissal. 708. Kfl«>«*t of Conviction. — Kvery conviction under this ])art shall have the same effect as a conviction upon indict- ment for tlie same ofi'ence. 799. Ortiii<'at«' of'lliNniiNNul 11 Bar to Fnrtlicr Pr4»4*C'('<lin}>;N. — Kvery person, who obtains a certificate of dis- missal or is convicted under tlie i)rovisions of this part, shall be released from all further or other criminal proceedings Fou THE SAME CAUSE. It has been held in England, under statutory provisions similar to the above Article 709, that, where a case summarily dealt with has been dismissed, by the magistrate or justice, on its merits, the defendant has the right ex debito justitiui to rin^ah'o the certificate of dismissal. (1) The certificate of dismissal should only be granted when there has been a full bearing on the merits. If granted on a withdrawal of the charge before hearing, it will be no bar to subsequent pro- ceedings for the same offence. (2) A summary conviction for assault has been held to be a bar to a suosequent indictment for a felonious stabbing based on the same (1) Hancock v.Somes 1 E. &E. 795; 28 L. J. M. C. 196. Costar v. Hether- iiigton, 1 E. & E. 802 ; 28 L. J. M. C. 198- (2) Reed v. Nutt, 24 Q. B. D. (J69. PRUCEEDI.NdS NOT TO BE VOID FOR DEKKCT IN KOKM. 295 tranHiictioii : (I) iind il huH boon hold u bur to iin indictiiu'iit for unlawful wouiuliiiu; uiid an assault occaHJoning actual iMuliiy liarm, arining out of the numu drt'umstauces. (2) A summary conviction for assault has, however, been held not to be u bar to a subsequent indietmeut for manslaughter, in a case where the man, who was assaulted, afterwards died in consequence of the assault. (H) It appears that the production of the cortiticate of dismissal is of it.self sutticient evidence of such dismissal, without proof of the signature of the magistrate or justice ; (4) and if the defendant api>eared before the magistrate or justice, tlie recital, in the certi- rtcate, of the fact of a complaint having been made and of a sum- mons having been issued, is sufficient evidence of these facts with- out producing the complaint or summons. (5) NOO. ProccedliiKN not to be Void for DcfVvt In Form. — No conviction, selftence or proceeding under the pro- visions of this part shall be quashed for want of form ; and no warrant of commitment upon a conviction shall be held void by reason of any defect therein, if it is therein alleged that the offender ha.s been convicted, and there is a good and valid conviction to sustain the same. jHOl. KcMult ot* Hearing: to be Flletl in Conrt of NeHMionw. — The magistrate adjudicating under the provisions of this part shall transmit the conviction, or a duplicate of a certi- ficate of dismissal, with the written charge, the dejiiositions of witnesses for the prosecution and for the defence, and the state- ment of the accused, to the next Court of General or (Quarter Sessions of the peace or to the court discharging the functions of a Court of General or Quarter Sessions of the peace, for the district, (1) R. V. Stanton, 5 Cox, 324 ; R. v. Walker, 2 M. & Rob. 446. (2) R. V. Elrinittoii, 1 B. & S. fl88 ; 31 L. J. M. C. 14 ; R. v. Miles, 24 Q. B. D. 42:i ; 59 L. J. M. C. 56. (3) R. V. Morris, L. R., 1 C. C. R. 90; 36 L. J. M. C. 84. (4) See The Canada Evidence Act 1893, sec. 10. See also Art. 802 of the Code, mjri'. . (5) R V. Wettley 11 ( ox, 139 ; Arch. Cr. PL & Ev. 21 Ed. 155. 296 PRACTICAL (illDK TO MAGISTRATES. county or iiliuc tlicrc to Ix' kept liy tlic pi'oju'r officer iimonif the records of the court. MOIS. FiVi4l«'iic«' of Coiivi<*tion or DiNiiiiKNal. — A copy of. such conviction, or of such cortiticate of disiui.ssiil, certitied by tlie i>ro])er otficor of the court, or proved to be a true copy, shall be sutticient evidence to prove a conviction or dismissal for tlie otflince mentioned therein, in any h\i>;al pi'oceedings. Him. IC<>Ntitiitioii ol" l*ro|»ert;»'. — Tlie magistrate by whom any [lerson has Iteen convicted under the ])rovisions of this part may order restitution of the j)roperty stolen, or taken or oi)tained liy false pretences, in any case in which the court, before whom the [)erson convicted would have been tried, but for the pro- visions of tills |)art. might by law order restitution. As to the ])ower of the .Magistrate to order hestitl'tion. and as to the further power to order co.mpensation to be made to a bona proE T'UKcnASER of STOLEN PRopKR'i^^'. see pp. 27(I-2T3. ante. ^04. Ifi<>iiiuii«l I'oi* fiirllii^r I ii%'<'Nti Ration. — Whenever any pcr.son is (diarged before any Justice or justices of the peace, with any otfence mentioned in section 783 of the Code, and in the opinion of suidi Justice or justices the case is proper to l)e disposed of summarily by a magistrate, as herein provided, the Justice or Justices bcfori' whom such person is so cdiargi'd may, if he or they sec tit. remand smdi ]ierson for further examination before the nearest magistrate in like manner in all I'espects as a Justice or Justices are authorized to remand a person accused for trial at any court, under Part X LW section 58(1 : (1) but no justice or Justices of the peace, in any province, shall so remand :iny i)er- son for further examination or trial before any such magistrate in any other jtrovince. Any person so remanded for further examin- ation betVire a magistrate in any city, may be examined and <lealt with Ity any otlu'r magistrate in tin- same city. mm. ^oii A|»|»«'ai*nii<*«> oi* AcciimimI iiii<l«'r K«'- 4*0)(iiiKail<*«'. — if any person suU'ercd to go at large upon enter- ing into such recognizance as the justice oi- Justices are authorized, (1) See p. 17'J, iiiilr APPLICATION OF PINES. 297 undei' Pavt XLV.. section 58*7; (1) 1<> take on the remand of a per- son ac'cusod. t'onditio\K'd for his a]>pcaranoc before a magistrate, does not afterwards ap]>ear. pursuant to such recognizance, the magistrate l)ofore whom he sliould have appeared shall certify, under his hand, on the ijacU of the recognizance, to tlie clerk of the peace of the district, county or place, or other proper officer, as the case may lie. the fact of such non-appearance, and sudi recog- nizance shall lie proceeded u])on in like manner as other recogniz- ances ; and such certificate sliall lie prima facie evidence of such non-appcaniMce without ])roof of the signatun' of the magistrate. SO<». Application of FiiiC'W. — Hvery tine and penalty imposed under the authority of this part shall be |>aid as follows, thai is to say : — (a) In the province of Ontario, to the magistrate who imposed the same, or the clerk of the court or clerk of the peace, as the case may be. to be paid over by him to the county treasurer for county })urposes. (6.) In any new district in the province of Quebec, to the sheritf of such district, as treasurer of the building and jury fund for such district, to fonn part o\' such fund. — and, if in any other district in the said province, to the [)rothonotary of such district, to be ai)|)lied by him. under the direction of the Lieutenant- (iovernor-in-Council. towards the keeping in repair of the court house in such district, or to lie added by him to the moneys and fees collected by him for the erection of a ccuirt house and gaol in such district, so long as such fees are collected to defray the cost of such erection ; (c) In the provinces of Xova Scotia and Xew l}run,swick, to the county treasurer for count j' pui-poses : and (c/.) In the ]»rovinces of Prince Kdward fsland. Manitoba and iJritish (^)lumbia. to the treasurer of the province. 807. ForiilN to he l>H'd.— Kvcry convictiim or certiti- catc may lie in the form Qt^, JilJ, or SS, in schedule one of the (1) Seep. 2(il,"?(<e. 2!>8 PRACTICAL OnilE TO MAOISTUATES. (Jode, applicable to tho caso. or to tlu' liko offoct, (I) niul wlii'iu'vor the iiatuvo of the L-a^o requires it. siicli forms may l)e altered liy omitting the words statiuuj the eonsent of the person to lie tried hefore the mai^istrate. ajul liy .. Iding the requisite words, statiiijj^ the fine imposed, if ainy. and the imprisonment, if any. to wlneh the jier.son eonvieted is to lie subjected if the fine is not snoner |iaid. HOS. Ortain ProviNionN not Applicable to this Part. — The provisions of the Code relating to jtreliminary inquiries before Justices — e.veept as mi^ntioneil in sections S04 antl H05 — and of Part LVIII., (2) shall not a|)ply to any prtieeedings under this ]tart. Xothing in this part shall affect the provisions of Part LVI. ; (3) and this ])art shall not extenil to persons pun- isliablcA under that part .so far as regard.s offences for which such persons may be punished tlu'i'i'under. FOK.MS UNDKIt PAKT LV. OF TIIH CODE. (HI— {Section SOT.) C<»NVUT10N. Canada, Province of . , County of ■ j I lie it remembered that on the day of in fill' year .at . A. H.. lieing I'liargi-d before me. the undersignt'd. . of the said {citt/}. and con- senting to my trying the charge sumnniriiy. is convicted liefore me. for that he. the said \. \i. ((tc, statttuj the offvnce. and the time and place when and where comviitted). and I adjudge the said A. U., for his .said otVence. to lie imprisoneil in the (and there ki^pt to hard labour) for the term of ' { I ) Fur Forms HR and S.S, see p. '-'!«•, }>ii>'i. (2) Uelatiiin to Siiminrtfy Coiivii'liuiic, see poH- (3) Relating to the Trial of Juvenile OtTendenj for Indictable Offen<!e8, see I'OR.Ms. 299 (liven uiidiT my liaud mid seal, the day aii I year tirst uliove ineiitii)iied. at al'oi'esaid. J. S.. [SKAI,.] J. F. {Name of counti/.) R\l.~l^Section S(iT.) CONVlCTIiiN ll'dN A I'l.KA OF GlILTV. Canada. ^ Pr<j\ini'e ot' , > County (if . J I5e il renieniheied iliat (Ui tlie day of in tlie year . at , A. B.. lieinii; eliar^'etl hetore nii' llie undersio-iu'd. . of tlie said {citi/) aud eonsentinij; to my iryiuii' the ( liarge smnmarily. for tliat he the said A. H. (ifci?., statimj the offence, and the time and place when and irhere committed), and pleading- j^uilty lo sncli ( har^-e. lie is ihere- u|ioii eonvicled iK'tni-f nie of the said ofltMU'e ; and I a<ljudge him the said .\. 1!.. for hi> said otfeiieo, to he imiirisoiied in the (^and there ke[it to hard labour) for the term or (li\-en niider my iiaud and seal, the day and year tirst ahove meiil iiinc(l. at aforesaid. .1. S.. [SKAL.] ./. P. (A^aine of county.) ■ ■:■■ >/ S<,.— (Section S(l7.) ' .'.'',-. CKItTiricATIO Ol- DISMISSAL. ( 'anada . ] Province of . > County of .J 1. the undersii;-iied. . of the city (or as the case may be) of . certify that on the day of , in the \ear . ut 20 300 ' PRACTir.Ai. r;rii)K to maoistrates, ufovejsaid. A. B.. ln'iiiii- charii'i'd licfori' iiu' (ami coiist'iitirig to my tiyiiig the cliaryi' suiiiiiiavily). fur tliat lu'. llio said A. M. ((£•<?., stalimj the ojfcnce chanjeil and the time and placa ichen and where alleged to have been committed). 1 did. al'tcr liaviiiy sinnmarily tried the said cdiai'i!;c. disiniss ilic sunic'. Given under my hand and si'al. this day ol' , in tlic year . at al'oivsaid. J. 8., [seal.] ./ P. {Name of county.) ciiAi'TKi; xrr. {^Part L VI. of the Code.) Trial of .Tl VENII.K OkKENKERS for rNJUCTAllLE Ob'FENCES. MOW. I>l'lillitioilN. — In tlns^iart. uidoss the eontext other- wise requires, — (a) Tlie ex])ression "two or moi-e justices," or "the justiees" inchules. — (i.) in tlie provinces of Ontario and ^NFanitoba any judge of the county court heing a Justice of the peace, judice magistrate or stipendiary magistrate, or any two justices of the peace, acting within tlieirrespectivi'jtirisdictions ; ; (ii.) in the province of Quebec any two or more justices of the peace, tlie slicritf of any <listrict. except ^[ontreal and Quebec, the deputy sheritf oi' (iasp*?. and any recorder, judge of the sessions of the peace, police magistrate, district magistrate or sti]»endiary magistrate acting within the limits of their respective juris- dicticms ; (iii.) in the provinces of Xova Scotia. Xew Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and British Columbia, and in the district of Kee- watin, any functiomiry or tribunal invested by the proper legis- lative authority with power to do acts usually requii-od to be done by two or mor<' justices of the peace ; I'L'NlSiniENT OK VOITIUIL OFFENDERS. lidl (6.) Till" expression • the coinmon i>-u<)I or otlier ])liiee ot'c<tiitiiie- ment'" ineliules uiiy n'tbriiiiitory in-ison proviiled for the reception of juvenile offenders in the province in wliicli tlie conviction re- i'erri'd to takes place, and to wlucdi, liy tiie law of that proviiuc. theoJfeiuU'r may lie sent. - •HIO* I'liiiiNliiiK'iit for Ntealiii)^. — Kvery person <dKir!i;e(l with liavinii: committed, or haviny attempted to commit any oifence whicli is tiikft. or punisliaiiie as theft, and whose a!j,e. at the period of llie coniiiiission oi' attempted commission of sncii otfenci'. (h)es not. in the ojiinion of the Justice l)efore whom lie is lirouf>'lit or ajipi'ars. exceed the agt' of si.XTEEN vears. sIkiH. upon conviction thereof in open court upon his own confession or upon )iroof. l)efore any two oi- more justices, he committed to tlie com- mon gaol or other place of continemeut within the jurisdiction of such justices. thiM'e to lie im])risoned. with or without hard lahour. for any term not exceedino three .months, or. in the discretion of sucii justices, shall forfeit and ])ay su(di sum. not e.vceedino twenty dollars, as su(di justices ailjudge. Mil. l*ro«*iiriiiK; Appvairaiit'e of AociimimI. — When- ever any person whosi^ age is alleged not to exceed sixteen veabs. is charged with anv otfence mentioned in the next itrecediuir section, on the oath ot' a cri'dilile witness, hefori' any justice of the ])eace. such justice nuiy issue his summons or warrant, to sumnu)n or to a|»prehend the person so (duirged. to appear hid'ore any two justices of tlu' peace at a time and place to lie nanu'il in sucli sum- mons or warrant. Section 2 of oT and 58 \'^ic.. c. 5S, provides as follows : — Young |(ersons apparently umh'r tlu' age of sixteen who are,— (a) arrested upon any warrant, or (b) committed to custody at any stage of a preliminary en(£uiry into a charge for an indictahle oifence. nr (c) committed to custotly at any stage of a trial, eitlu'r for an indictahle offence or for an otVence punishahle on sumnuiry con- viction, or (d) committod to custody after sucii trial hut hefore InipriHon- niont under sentence. — 3(12 I'UAt'TICAI, (il IDK Til .MAGrsTUATKS. SHALL be kept in custody se]tiir;iU' tVi>iu alAvr iicisoiis cliarii-cd witli criininal (itVi'iioes aiul sojiaratc Irom all persons undergoing sentences of imprisonment, and suai.i, not lie lonlincd in tlu- JncU- iijis or ]ii)lici' stations witli older ]k'1soii-. cliarii'ed witli criminal offenees. nor witli orilinary criminals. • • Article o')!) of tlie Code, as anu-nded liv s,ic. 1 of the aliove Act. makes it i.mi'EHAtive tliat the trials of persons, apiiarently under sixteen siiAi.i. take place ■\vithoiil imldiciiy. and separately ami apart from the trials of oilier accused persoii>. (1) Hi:2. ItolliaiKl 4»r A<*<*IIW<mI. — .\ny justice of llii> peace, if lie thinks tit. may renuind for further e.xaiiiiiiatioti or for trial, or suffer to go at large, ujiou his tinding <utlicient sureties, any sueli jterson cdiarged hcd'ort' him with any sue h olVence as afore- said. 2. I'lvery such surety shall he liound \<y recogni/.aiice conditioned for the api)earunci' of siudi person hclore the same or scmie other justice or justices of the peace for furt her examination, or for trial hel'ore two or mori' justices (if the peace a>- aforesaid, or for trial hy indictnu'iit at the ])roper ( 'ourl of < 'riniiiial .lurisdiction. as t hi' case may i»e. ."!. I'A'ery such reeogui/ance may he enlarged, from time to time. liy any su(di justice or justices to siuh liirthcr time as he or they ap|)oiiit ; and every such recognizance not so enlarged --liali he iliscliargeil without fee or reward, when the person lias appeared aecoi'diiig to the conditi<ui thereof. Htii. A<'4'IIM«><1 in VAvvi lloti ll<> Nliall Im' Triod. — The justices hel'ore whom any person i> ( hargi'd and proceeded against under the provisions of this part.licfore suidi person is asked whether he has any cause to show why h<' slnmld not he CI nvictcd. shall say lo the |ierson ^o < harged. tln'sc words, or words to the like etfi'ct : • We shall have to hear what you wisli to say in answer to (he ihai'ge against you; hut if vmi wish to he tried lp_>- a Jury, you must ohject now to our deciding u|ioii it at once." (1) As to disposal of yciun^' children charged with ofleiicus in Ontario, see sees, o, 4, 5, of 57 tS: OS Vic, o. oS, in the .\ppendix,;io.-(. Acri SKIi I'D El. KIT .MiMiK <>V TIUAI.. '.WA 2. And il'sucii pfi'sdii. or ;i piii'ciit or <i;uar(liitM of sucli in-rson, then oltjocts. no fui'tlirr |iroci'c(lin<fs sluill Ik- lisid nndi'r tlu' [trovis- ionsot'llds ])iirl ; l>iit I lie jusiiccs niaydfid wit li tlu' case according to tlu' provisions set out in I'arts XJilV, and Xl-N'.. (1) as if tlie act-nsi'd were lieforc llniii tiiereunder. Ml 1. %%'li«'ii .i<'4*iiK«'«l hIiiiII not lie Tri«>4l Niiiii- lliarily. — if the Justices are of (»|)inion. lie fore tiie jierson charged lias nuide Ids defence, tiiat tlie t iiarge is. from any circumstances, a tit sniiject foi' |(rosecnlion iiy indi<-tment. or if tiie |)erson cdiarged. ujiou licing caili'd uiion to answer tiie ciKirge. objects to tlie case lieing suininariiy dis|io-.cd of under tiie provisions of this part, the Justices sliali not di'al wiiii it summarily, hut may proceed to hohl a preliminary in(|iiiry as provided in I'arts XLIV. and XFiV^. '2. In case the acrusrd lias elected to he tried liy a Jury, the Jtis- tict's shall stale in tiir warrant of c(Miiniitnien( the fact of such eifclion haviiiii' heeii made. Ml«>. Kllllllll<»1IK t4» WillK'KN. — .Vliyjuslii-e of tlic peace may. hy suninions. re(|iiire the alteiidam'c (d' any |)ersoii a> a wit- ness upon the hcariiii;' of any case ln'fort' two Justices, under the authority of this jiari. at a lime and place to lie named in sucli suinnioiis. <SIH. ItiiKliiiK' <»v«'r Witn*'N». — Any such Justi<-e may reiiuire and hind \>y reeogni/.ance every jierson whom he consiilers necessary to lie examini'il. touching the matter of sucdi change, to attend, at 1 he time ami plaee appointed hy him. ;ind then and tlu-re to give eviileiice ujion llie hearing of su(di charge. H17. M'arraiit au;siiiiNl \%'itiiowN. — if any person, so summoned or re(|nired or Ipound. as aforesaid, lu'glei'ts or ri'tu.ses to attend ill pursuance of >u(di summons or recognizanci'. and if proof is gi\-eii of siudi person having hci'ii duly summoned, as hei'c- inafter im-ntioned. or hound hy recognizance, as aforesaid, eitiiortd' t lie Justices hefore wiiom any such person should have attended. n\ay issue a warrant to compel his appearance as a witness, (1) Kelaling to the preliminary investigation of indictable offences. 804 PRAOTirAI. (ii:n>E T(l MAGISTRATES. MIN. N('rvi4*e ol* Niiiiiiiioiim. — Kvcrv summons issued iimler the autliority of this part may itosiTvod hy delivoviiig a copy thovoof to llu' person, or to some inmate, apparently over stXTEKX YEARS OF A(iK. at sueh per.>ion's usual place oC ahode ; and every person .so renuired hy any writing under the hand or hand.s of any Justice or Justices to attend and give evidence as aforesaid, shall lie deemed to have heen duly sum?noned. HIU. DiM4*llur^«' 4>r .i<*4>IIN(Ml. — if the Justices, upon the licarini;- of any such case, deem tlu' otfence not provi'd. or that it is not expi'dient to iutiict any i)unishment. * .ley shall tlismissthe per- son charg'ed. — in the latter case on his tin. ling sureties for ids future good hehaviour. and. in the former ease, without sureties. — and then make out and deliver to the pejson charged a cei-titicatc in the FORM TT in scheuile one to this Act. (1) or to the like etlect. under tlie hands of sueh Justices, stating the fact of suiii dismissal. H20. Form ol* €'<»iivi<'tioii. — 'i'hc Justices, hcfore whom any ]»erson is suniMuirily convicted of any otVeuce hereinheforc mentioned, nuiy I'ause the conviction to he drawn up iu the fohm W, in scnE])ii,E one of the Code. (2) (u- in any other form to the same ett'ect, and the conviction sliall he good and ettectual to all intents and jiuriioses. 2. Xo such convictii)u shall he ([uashed for want of form, oi- he . removed by cerr/orrtn or otherwise into any court of record : and no warrant of commitment shall he held void hy reason of any defect therein, if it is thei'cin alleged that the person has heen con- victed, and there is a good and valid conviction to sustain thesame. S2I. Fiii'tlit'r l*i*04*«>«'«liiiK; BariH'd. — Kvery person who obtains such certiticale of dismissal, oris so convicted, shall he released from all further or othei- crinunal ]inicci'dings for the same cause. See comments and and authorities under .\i'ticle T'.tO. at jip. 2!)4- 21^5, ante, us to the certificate of nisMrssAi,. and its etlect as a bar to further proceedings. (1) For Form TT, see p. 308, poH. (2) For Form UU, see p. 309, post. UBSTITITION. 305 M2S« C'oiivi4*i ion » 11(1 K<>«*4»KiiiKaii<*eN tolic Filed. — Tho justices iK't'ore whom any jhm'soii is convicted iiiulor the pro- visions of this |)ai't shall fortiiwitii transmit the conviction and Tocognizanci's to tiio clerk of the jieatH' or other proper otiicer, for tlie district, city, county or union of counties wherein tlie ottonce was committed, tliore to l)e l<eitt liy the proper otiicer among the records of tlie Court of (leneral or (Quarter Sessionsof tlie peace, or of any otlier court dischar<^-ini;- the functions of a Court of (leneral or (Quarter Sessions of the jieace. MSSi. 4|uart«»rlj|- K4>tliriiK. — i-lveiy derU of the peace, or other proper otticer. shall ti'ansniit to the Minister of Agri- culture a quarterly return of the names, otlences and punishments mentioned in the convictions, with >uch other pai'ticulars as are, from time to time, requireil, HS4. ICi'Htitliiioii «!' ■■iM»|it*rt,v.— No conviction under the authority id' this jtai't shall he attended with any forfeiture,, except such jienalty as is imposed hy the sentt'uce : but whenever any person is a<ljudged guilty under the provisions of this jiart, the presiding justice may ordci- I'cstilution ot' [iroperty in respect of which tlie ott'ence was committed, to the owner thereof or his re])resentatives. 2. If siud) property is not then fort hconnng. the justices, whether tliey awartl iiunisliment or not. may inquiri^ into and ascertain tlie value thereof in money : and. if they thinU projier, order payment of such sum of money to the tnu- owner. Iiy the person convicted, either at one time or hy instalments, at smdi pei'iods as the justices- tleem I'l-asonahli'. ii. The jierson ordered ti> pay sm h sum may he sued for the same as a debt in any court in whith debts of the like amount are, hy law. recoverabl(>. with costs of suit, according to the jn-actice of eucli court. H*Hi, l*i*4»<'<'«Mliiip; on ^'on-pay inent of Penalty lni|»ONlMl. — Whenever the justices adjinlge any ott'eiider to for- feit and pay a pecuniary penalty under the authority of this part, and such penalty is not forthwith paid, they may. if they deem it expedient, apjioint some future diiy for the payment thereof, and 30(l PIlACTIfAI- (JIIDK TO M.\(; I STIt ATKS. ordiT till' (itU'udi'v to 111' (Irtaini'd in >iil't' fiistdily uiilil llii' day so iipiioiiiti'd, uidi'ss suidi otlriidiT i;'ivi's st'i'iii'ily to tin- satistiu'tioii of till' Justici's. lor Ills a|)|)i'araiiri' on siirli day ;• and the Jnstict's niav taki) Hiudi si'curily by w'ny of I'd'oonizanci' or otliiTwisi' in tlii'ir <Uiseretioii. 2. ri' at any tinu' so ai>]iointrd sucli |icnalty lias not Ih'imi paid, (111' sanio or any otlirr justir>s of tlif prair may. Iiy wai'rant. iindi'T tlu'lr hands and soals, coniniit tlic oilrndiT to tlic coimiion gaol or otlior phu'i' of I'oiifiiirnii'iit within their jiirisdictioii. tlioiv to ri'inaiii for any linii' not I'xri't'dinn' three inoiitlis. ri'cl<oiied from the day of sueli adjiidieation. MtS<>. C'o^In. — The justices liefore whom any person is proso- cuted or tried for aii\' otleiu'e eon-iii/;il>le under this ]»arl may. in their discretion, at the ri'(|uest of the prosecutor oi" of any other person who appears on recoyni/.ancc or summons to prosecute or give evidence against siudi jierson, onh'r payment to the |prosceiitor and witnesses for the jirosecution. id' such s\ims as to them seem reasonahle and sulticieut. to reimlmrse such proseeiitor and wit- nesses for the expenses they lia\e ■severally incurred in attending hefore them, and in otherwise carrying on sucii |irosecutiou, and als(.) to compensate them for their troiilije and loss ot' time therein. — and may order jiayment to the constaliie> and other peace ottie- ers for the ap]tn'liension and dctuution of any )iersou so charged. 2. The Justices may. although no conviction takes place, order all or ;uiy of the jtayments aforesaid to he made, when they ai'e of opinion that the persons, or any of tlieiii. have acted in good faith. H'i7. Application of Fill«>M. — l-'.vcry tine imposed undei- the authority of this part shall lie ptiid and applied as follows, that is to say : — (a.) in the jirovince of Ontario, to the justices who imjiose the same or the derU of the county court, or the clerk <d' the ]ieaee. or other proper oiiicer, as the ease may lie. to he hy him or them paid over to the county treasurer for county purposes ; (6.) In any new district in the province of (^uehec. to the sheritt' of such district as treasurer of the liuilding and jury fund for siu'h district to form part of such fund, and in any other district in tlio COSTS. 307 |iroviiicc" oC (^iiflii-c ti) tlic jtrollioiiotiiry oi' such district, to lie applicil by liiiu, iiiidci' tlu- direction of tlio Ijioutcimnt-dovciMiov- in-CouiK'il. towards tiic koc[)in^f in r('i»iiir of the court house in su(di district or to he iid(h'd hy idin to tlu' money or fees col- lected hy hiiM for the erection of a court house or gaol in such district, so loii^ as siuli fees are collected ti> defray the coHt of su(di erection ; (c.) Jn the pi'ovinces of Xova Scotia and Xew Hrunswick. to the county treasurer, for county- jturposes ; and (d.) In the [irovinees of l^rince Kilward Island. .Manitoha and British Coluinhia to the treasurer of the province. H2H. 4'oKtM lo he CVrtified b.y JiiNticvN. — The amount of expenses of attending before the justices and the coin- pensatiou for t rouble and loss of time therein, and allowances to the constable and other peace otticers for the ap|irehension and deten- tion of the ort'ender. and the allowances to be jiaid to the jirose- cutor. witnesses and constables j'or attending at the trial or examination of the otfender. shall Ite ascertained by and certitied under the hands ot' such Justices; but the amount of the costs, charges and e.\|tenses attending any such pi'osecution. to be allowed and paid as aioresaid, shall not in any one case t^.xcet'd the sum of eight dollars. 2. Every su(di oi'der of ])aynu'nt to any ])rosecutor or otlu'r ])er.sou. after the amount thereof has been certitied by the proper juistices of the jieace as aforesaid, shall be forthwith made out and deliveivd by the said justices or one of them, or by the clerk of the })eace or other proper otticer, as the case may be. to such prosecutor or other person, u])on such clerk or otticer being paid his lawful fee for the same, and shall be made u])()n the otticer to whom tines imposed under the authority of this part are required to be paid ovi'r in the district, city, county or union of counties in which the otfence was i'f)mmitted. or was supjjosed to have been committed, who, u])on sight of every such order, shall forthwith pay to the person named therein, or to any other person duly authorized to receive the sanu' on his behalf, out of any moiu^ys received by him under this part, the money in such ordei- men- tioned, and he shall be allowed the same in his accounts of such moneys. i{()S PHArrrrAi, (tlinK t<» mAoihthatIcs. M2!l. .i|>|»li4'Hlioii of lliiM l*art.— Tlu' jM-nvisioiiH <>t' this jiiii't shall not apjily to any otli'iuH-. comiMilti'd in the provinces of I'l'inct' Kdward Ishiml or Hritisli ("olunihia. or the district ot" Kt'i'watin, |iiinisiiai)li' hy iniprisonnu-nt lor two years and up- wards ; and. in smh provinct's and district.it slndl not he neces- sary to transmit any recoi^in/ancc to tlic clerk of the peace or other pro|ier otlicer. HilO. .\o liii]>riM»iiiii«'iit ill ltororiiiHtor.v in On turio. iiiid«'i* tliiM Plirf. — Tlie provisions of this part sliall not anthori/e two or more justices of the peaci- to sentence oHcn- dcrs to imprisonment in a reformatory in tht' |)i'ovince of Ontai'io. Hlil. Otiioi* l*ro<*('«'diii)>;M A^tiiiiMt Jiivoiiilo Oi- IVll4i4'rw. — Xothin^f in tiiis part shall prevent tiu' summai'v con- viction of any porsou. who niiiy he tried thi'i'eundcr hefoi'c one or nioro justices of tlie jd'acc, foi- any otl'ence for wliich he is liable to ho so convicted undi'r any other jiart of the (.'ode or undei' any otlier act. FORMS rXDIOli I'AHT LVI., OK TIIK CoDlv TT.— (Section H\\).) - , ; ' CEHTII''l<'ATE OK KIS.MISSAl,. Taiiada, ") "We , JMsti<-es of Province' of , V the peace for the of County of , J , { or if a recorder ; &c., I, a , of the of , as the case may be), do herehy cerlity tiiat on the day <if , in the year at , in tlie said of , A. B., was hrought before us, the said justices (or me. the said ) charged with the folloAviug otience, that is to say (here state briefly the particulars of the charge), and that we, the said justices, for I, the said J thereupon dismissed the sai(i ciiarge. (iivi'ii uiidif iMir liands iiiid seals, (or my liaiul ami seal) this (lay of , in I lie year . at at'tuvsaid, .1. I', [sea I,.] .1. I{. [seal.] or S. .f. [sBAt,.] UU.— (Sed<onS20.) CiiNVICTION. :! Canada. Province of Connty of Beit .vememliercd tliat on tlie day of ,iu tlie yeai- , at , in tlie county of . A. H. is convicted iK'foiv lis. ,F. 1*. anil .1. W., justices of tlie j)cace for the said county (or me, S. .1.. recorder, of the , of . or as the case maij be) for tlial ho, the said \. M., did (s/iecif;/ the ojlcnre arid the fime and place when and where the same was committed, as the case may be. but without setting forth the evidence), and wi' the said J. P. and J. U. (or I, the said S. .1.), adjudge the said A. H.. for iiis said oH'ence, to ii(> imprisoned in the (or to lie imiirisoned in tlu' . and there l<e[it at hard laliour), for tlie s|iace of , (or we) (or 1) adjudge' the said A. H.. for his said offence, to foi-foit and pay (here state the penalty actually imposed)^ and, in default of immediate iiayincnt of the said sum, to he im- prisoned in the (or to he imprisoned in tlu- and kept at hard lahoiir) for the term of ,niilessthe said sum is sooner jiaid. (iiven under our liands and seals (or my hand and seal), the day and year first ah<ivo mentioned. J. \\ [ska I..] J. JJ. [sea I-.] or S. J [seal.] :!i(i I'I{A( TICAt, (MIlPK T(i .\rA(ilSTHATKS '. ("llAITKi; XIII. (Part L VIJL. of the Code.) S I M .M A H V Ci I N VICT r< • .\ S, H'.IU. llll«>l*|»IM>lalioil.— In tliis |.;irl. lllil.'ss IJic coiilrxl 111 liii-\\ i^c n'([iiii'cs : {a.) the i'\|)rrs>i(Mi ■•.liislicc " iiu'iiiis ii Juslicr of tlir pciicc mikI inciudi-. l\\(i or nun\' Juslico il' two or iiioi'i' Jvistii'i's act or iiavi' Jiii-isdictioii. uikI aUo a police ina-'istratc, a sli|u'ii(liary iiiai;-istrati' -> and any pcison liaviii;;- ilic powoi- oi' aiitliofitv of two or more jus- tices lit' t lie jicacc : (/'.) llic cNprcssi.in ••Clerk of tlic Peace" includes tlie proper oflicei- oi ill,' conn havinu- jni^i^diclion in ajipeal under tli is part, as in'ovided liy sectinn ^T'.i : (c I the e.xpi'es^ioii • lerrit orial division" means ilistrict, count)-, uniiui ot eonntio, township, ciiy. town, parisli or otlier judicial divisiiin or place ; ('/. ) tlie e\pre>x|,,ii 'di-.iricr' or •• cmiuty " includes any terri- ttu'ial or Judicial divi-iMii or place in and for wliicli there is such JiKlge. Jiisiiec. jii>iice\ court, otlicer or priMiu as is mentioned in tiu' context : (('.) 1 he expression ■• eoinn. on y^aid " lU' •■ prison '■ means an\- place •' other than a penileiiliary in which persons char^^ed with olt'euces are usually kepi and delained in custoilv. ' .HlO. A|)|>li«'jili4»ii.— Siihieet to any special provision otlK'r- wiseeiiacieil with rc-pect to such olleiice. act or matter, this part shall a ppl\' lo ; (d.) K.x'Kin c.v.sK in which any iierson coniniits. or is suspected <d' having coiiimitteil, any otfeiu'c or act oVKit wiiinii riiK i'.vki.ia- MKNTOK CA.\AI>.\ HAS I,E(i 1 Sl.ATI V K AlTllolUTV. ami for which sucil person is liahle. on summary conxictioii. to iiuprisoninent. tine, penalty or other punishment ; SI .M.MAHY CONVICTIONS. :5ll (b.) KVEHY CASE ill wliicli !i (■omi)l!iiiil is iiuiilr to any justice in relation to any malter. ovkk which tiik I'AKI.ia.mk.nt ov canaha HAS I.KIIISI.ATI VK AITHiilUTV. ail<l witll IVSpi'ct to wliirii SUcll jus- tifc lias authority iiy law to iiiake- any onior tor tlu' jiayniciit of monov or otlicrwisc. Mil. Tiiiio uitliin wliieh 1*i*4»4'«'<><liii}rM isliall hv C'4»iiiiii<'1I«*«mI. — In till' casL' of any otti'iicc |iniiis|ialiK' on suni- niary conviotion. if no time is specially liniilcil for nial<iiii;- any (•oin]ilaint, or iayinn' any infornuition. in tlic Act or law rclatiiiii' to the jiarticniar case, the complaint shall he iiiailc. or the infonnation shall he laiii within six months from the time when the matter of com|ilaint or information arose, exccjit in the Xorth-wx'st Terri- tories. where the time within which such coiii|ilaiiit may lie nneh'. or such intorniation may he laid, shall in' extemleil in rwEi.VE .MONTHS from the time \vlieii ihe matter of ihe ciiiii|(laiiit or infoV mat ion arose. It will he seen hy thi> .Vrticle that in summary matter^, not <itherwise specially limited, the |)roseculion mu-'l he commenced l>i/ the makinij ot the complaint or the layini;' of thi' information wiihin six months, (in all places except the X. \V. Territories where the time limiti'd is tweUe months) from \\w lime when the maltcr <if complaint or information arose. liui lln' layim;' nf ihe cnmplnint or t he malsiiiii' of t he infoi'iiialion should lie lollowed up l>y useful proeee(|ini!;s in the shape ofa warrant or summons aiel the arrest of or otherwise hrinuiny tiie defendant hefore the mayiistrate or justice. Sei' autluu'ilies and comiin'iits. ujion this vnhjcci. at pp. tlS- '-. (inie. .S Iti. •lliri.S<li<*f i<»ll.--l''.very comphiinl and infoi'inal ion shall he heard, tried, determined and adjiidu'ed hy one ju-tice or t wo or more Justices as direct ei I hy the Act or law . ujioii whit h the eomplainl or intorniation is iVameil or l>y any other .\el or law in that hehalf. '1. 1 f there is no siudi di reel ion in any .\ct <m' law, then the com- plaint lu' infornuition may he hea n I, trieil^ determined and adjiidtjed iiy aii\ one justice for the territorial division whefe the matter ot' ihe complaint (U' information arose: Provided that every 'Uie who aids, ahets, counsels or procures the e<mimission ot' any I'lfenee 312 PRArTLCAK (11 lUK T<> MAOISTKATES. Ituiiisliiililo on suiiimai'v coiivictioH, niiiy lie procot'dod against and c-onvifli'd t'itln'rin the territorial division or jilaeo where the jirin- eipai olVender may he eonvieted. or in that in whieh tlie otleneo of aiding, ahetting, counselling or procuring was eoniniilted. .!. Any one justiee may reeeive the information or eomplaint, and gi'ant a summons or warrant thereon, and issue his summons iir warrant lt> eomjiel the attendance of any witnesses for eithiu" party, and do ail oihei' acts and matters necessary preliminai'V to tlie hearing, even if hy the statute in that iiehalf it is jirovided lliat the infovmatiou or eomplainl shall he heard and deternnnetl li\' two or more Justiei's. 4. After n tii>v has heen hi-ard and detei'tnined one Justice may issue ail wari'ants ot' distress or commitment thereon. (I) ' ."). It shall not lie necessary for the justice who acts hefoue or Ai-TEK the hearing to he the justice or one (d" the justices hy whom the ease is- to he oi' was heard and deternuni'd. (i. It' it is re([uircd hy any Act or law that an information oi- coinjilaint shall lie heard and dcternuncd hy two or mori' justices, or that a conviction or order shall lie maile hy two or m<ire justices, such justices SlIAM, HE I'KESENT ANO ACriNd TOliETUER iHlil.NtJ THE WHOLE OF THE IIEAHIM; ANH UETEK.M r.NATIO.N of the case. 5, No justice shall hi'ar ami detci'mine any case of assault or liallcry. in w hiidi any <|Ucstioii arises as to the title to :iny lands, tt'iienienls. liei'editanients. or any interest therein oi' accruing tlu'rc- from. or as to any hankruptcy or insolvency, or any exi'culion un<iei' ihe process <it' any court ot' justice. As to the ousti'r of the sunnuuvy jurisdiction of justicis when ju'operty or title is in (juestion or theri' is a bona fide (daim of legal right to do the aci rouiplaincd ot'. sei' comment:; and authorities jit p]i. 'i\'l-M\. ante. A43. l*r4»4'«M><liiiKM bt'lort' JiiMtitH'M. — Tiie pi'ovisions of Parts XLIV and AJi\', of the ('ode. relating to com|telling the apjiearance of the accused hefore tlio justice receiving an iiifor- niation under section ^'tS. and the |irovisions res[iecting tiic attcnd- (1) See also Art. H85 po^t, enij)owerin>; any other justice than the justice who 'jonvicts to issue a warrant of distress or oonimitment. PROCEEDIN'ciS llKKdKE .lUSTICES. 313 mice of wiliu'sscs on a itivlimiiiiirv iiKiuiry and tlu- taking of evidence lliereim, siiall. so i'ar as tiu' same aiv ap|tiicai)ie, except as varied Ity sci'tiniis immediately following, ap]ily to any hearing \nidei' the ]>i'ovisions of this ])ai't : Provided that whcnevei' a war- rant is issncd in the tii'st instance against a person charged witli an otfenci- ]innishal)li' nnder the provisions (d' this part, the Jnsticc issuing it shall fui'nish a copy or cojiies thereof, and cause a copy to he served on the person arrt^-iied nt t!'.'.' time of SUuh aiivsi. 2. Notliing herein contained shall ohlige any justice to issue any summons to piMcnrc the attendance of a ])erson cliarged with an otfence hy infoi'mation laid hefoi'c sucdi Justice wlu'nevei' tlie apjtli- cation for any or(ler may. Iiy law. lie made ex parte. Till' ahove pi'ovision as to service of a copy of tlie warrant is merelj' directoy ; and it has heeii held tliat. whei'c the defenchmt apjiears and does not claim to he pT'ejndiced nor ask tor further time, the omissnni to serve upon him a copy of the warrant at tlie time of his arri'>t does not go to the magistrate's jurisdiction, and is no ground for (|uasiiing a conviction. (1) The wording of these two Articles indicates tiiat tliey are to he read in conjunction with and as if tlie jirovisions of Parts XLl V and XLV relating to compelling the a})pearance of persons charged with rxKtcr.MU.E otfences were here repi'ated in n'lation to non- iNnicT.viiLK. otfencos ; and. tlu'refore. it seems that a Justice may comiiel the appearance of an accused ]ierson for the purpose of heing tried siimmaril}- in any of the cases mentioned in Article r)")4, ante, namely : (rt.) Ifsuth pei'son is accusi'd of having committed in any place (c/w^eyer an (dlcnee Iriahle in the province in which siudi Justice resides, ami is. or is suspected to lie. within the limits over which such Justice has Jurisdiction, or resides or is suspected to reside within such limits : (J).) if such iierson. wherever hi' nuiy he. is accu.sed of having ctunmitled an otl'ence within such limits ; (c.) if su(h person is alh'ged to have anywhere unlawfully received property which was unlawfull}' obtained within such limits ; , (1) Ex parte Lutz, 27 8. C N. S. 491. 314 I'RACTICAI, (il IDE To .\IA(i I STUATKS. (r/.) Il'siicli pi'i'soii liiis ill his possi'ssioii, williiii siuli iiiuils, any stolon property. ' ^ Soi' Artie U' 7h),-i. antf. as to ort'i'iu't's (•(iniiniilcil on or in>artlu' boundary oftwo or more magisterial jurisdietion^-. or eommitteil 11)11)11 any veliieleor vessel in tlie eoiirse of a journey orofan iniaiul river or lake voyage, llirougli several magisterial jiiri'-ilietion.-. And. as lo ott'eiiees committed on the high seas or in any piaci' witiiin the iurisdiction of tlu' Admiralty, see Article "xiO. anie. and comments and authorities, on the same siiliject. at ]t]\ Tli 77. ante. .SI4. Ifiai'liiii^; WarraiilN. — 'I'he provisimisnt' section ,")(;') of t lie Code, relating tot lie endorsement of warrants nIkiII apply to the ease of any warrant issued under the jirovisions ot this part against tlu' accused, whether hkkouk or akteh conviction, and whetiicr for the A im'Kkiie.nsion or i.Mi'KisoN mknt of any muIi [lerson . This section, when reailwith .Vrtiele rxl,") (p. ll."). rt/if*;). empowers the hacking not only of a warrant (d' arrest, hut also of a wai'raiit id' coininitmeiit issued upon a conviction made in one county or district, lor the purpose of arresting the convicteil per-on in any other part of ( 'anaila. , .S4fl. liilViriiialioiiM aii<l 4'(»iii|»l)iiiifK It shall not he necessary that any coiiiiplaint upon whndi a justice may maUe an OHDER for the payment of niom-y or oilnrwi-e -hall he i\ waiTlNti, unless it is .>o remiired hy some [larticular .\ct or law ujion whi( h sin h comjilaiiit is founded. li. Mvery ('o.mi'|,.\int up hi whi(di a justice is authori/.rd hy law to make an order, and every i.nko|{.m.*tio.\ lor aiiv otVetice or act lum- ishahle on suinniary conviction, may. unless it is herein or hy .some |)iirticuliir Act or law otherwise jirovided. he madeorliad wrniori' AW OATH ol< Ah I'IKMATION as to tie' Iriilh thereof. .">. I']\'ei'y coniplaini shall he for om', .m.vttku or compi-.m.nt only, ami not loi* two or more matters of com|ilaiiit, and every informa- tion shall he for onk oFrKNCK only, and not for two or moi-e otlV'ii- ces ;!ind every eom|>laiiit or informatitui may lie laid or made hy the complainant or inloriiiaiit in |ierson, or hy his <ouiis(d or att'ir- iicy Of other person authorizeil in that hehalf. TllK INFORMATION oR fOMl'LAINT. ;>45- Tlu' distiiK'tioii irciHTiilly iiiiKlc between ;in inforniiUion ami a coinpliiiiit is as follows : AVIurn I lie iiroccediiii;- is one tiiUen aguiiist a ])arty cliai-yeil witli the eoiuniission of, or who is susjiected to have eoinmitted a enm- iiial aet or offeiiee f'oi' wiiich he is liahle. on suiiiinary eoiivietioii, to iiiiprisomiient. tine, pt'iialty or othei iiunij^hnient. an information is laid ; and when th<' proeeedin<«- is oin' aijfunst a iterson liiihle ]>y law io iiave an order niaile ii|ion hiin to pay a snni of money or to do some aet whieii lie has illcii;ally failed, nejifleeteil or refnsed to do. a cOMiM.AiNT is made. Altlionjili the ahuve Ai'tiele S-i") does not expressly n^([\\\ro an TNFORM.\TiON to he taken in writing', it evidrnlly im|ilies that it slionld he sii taken, hy s|H'cially inenliiminn- that a co.mI'I-aint need not be in writinii;. nidess so re(|iiired by some partieular Act <>!• law ii]ion whi(di the iMim|ilaint is founded. The iNF(»R.MATioN should contain the infornnint's name, oeenpa- tion and addre.ss. the date and |daee of laying- it. with t he name ami style nf t he justice before whom it is laid, and the name, occii- jtation and address (if known) of the |n'rson (dniru'ed. or, if his itami', occniiatioii and address be unk'nown. then scunt' othi'i' des- cription of him. When the .\ct Of law undi'r which the |iro<'ccdini;'s are tak'en extemis only to persons of a particulai' class, ollice or situation in life, tile party (dnirifcd >hould In- shown to come within thedeserip- tion of such persons. (1 And where any tiling is declared to be an otVence stth modo only, the facts should be averred with the necessary modilication. l-'or instance, in jn'occcdinn' ai;'ains| a per- son for sellinu; intoxicatin ;■ li(|Uor without a licen.so. it would not be suHicieiit to simply alleifi- that he sold the li([uor, but it would b(MU'eessarv to aver that he sold it. without having a liceii-e to sell intoxicaliii;!,' lienor. The above Artich' S4r) n'miires that every information shall be for one olVcnce only, and not for two or more olVeni'cs ; but .Vrticde W^l.pont, provides that no information, etc., sluill be held to cliargo l\\ () oll'ences or be held to be uncertain, on account ol' its stating the oU'enee to have been coinmitled in ditlerent modes, or in i-espfct (1) Sandmuui v. Breach, 7 B. ^ C. lOn ; K. v. Caton, l(i Unt. R. 11. ^ _ ^ :_., . : -21..-:---'-^ 3)16 TRAOTrCAL (illl)K Tn >r AOrSTH.VTRS. of oui' or ollu'i- of several articlfs eitlu'r (•(Hijinu lively or (lisimiet- ively. It' distinct ami soparati^ acts are ooiumitteil on dillerenl days, tlio oti'onees are distinct and sniiject In sei»arale jienaities. (1) Hnt aniitignily arises upon a repetition of similar acts npon the same day. With i'e<;'ard to cases of this kind, no i;\'ni!ral ride can helaid down ; hut the law in I'acdi case must he delerniined hy tlu' nature of tlio otience and the numner in \vhi(h the particular statute applieahle to if is worded. l\illinn' se\eral hares on the satne day has been held to he a sinu'lc otfeiu-c ; and so. likewi.se. is ', .\ercisin<i- trade on a Sunday a fiingle otfence. althou<;di sevei-al sales have taken place. (2) See further comments at pjt. o3r)-33i). post. If a justici', u|ion an infornuition or a complaint lieini;- laid or imide hefore him, declines or refuses |o act. a mandamus will In- granted, and the court will set the Jurisdn'tion of the Justice in nu)tion hy directing- him to hear ami d(-terminc the nnitter; (.'!) and altiiough a Htatuti'. which provides that a justice may issue a summons or warraid, if he thinksjit, gives him a discretion in the issuing of a summons or w;u-rant, he is hmmd to exei-(-ise this dis- cretion, and if. on a (-onsideration id' something extram-oiis. lu- refuses tlu- summons or warrant, the court will ordei- him to issue it. (t) H4G. ('«>i*ttiiii <ll»jc>««ti4»iiK ii4»l !<» ^ ilial«> I*im»4*«m>4I- ill^;Mo — No infoi-nKitii>n. coiujilaint. warrant, conviction or other procee<ling under this part shall lie deemed ohjci-tiomihle or insulii- cient on any of the following groumls. that is to say : (a.) that it does not contain tin- name ot' the person injured, or intended or attempted to he injuicd ; or (b.') thiit it does not state who is the owner of any pi-operty therein mentioned : or (1) R. V. Mathews, 10 Mod. 27. (2) Marriott v. Shaw, Cowp. 278; R, v. Lovett, 7 T. R. 152; Creppe v. Burden, Cowp. (i4(i ; 1 Smith's L. V. 37S ; Wray v. Toke, 12 Q. B., -ini). (H) R. V. Kent, 14 F^ast. :m ; R. v. Surrey, 2 Siiow. 74 n. (4) R. V. Adamson L. R. 1 (i. H. D. 201. See comnientH and authorities at pp. 64-57, ante, as to comi)elling justices to exercise their functions. OHKEKINi. Kl HTIIKR I'.VKTICII.AHS. Sl^ (r.) tliat il iltn's lint s]iccity tlu' nu'itiis liy whicli I lie olUiicc was o()iuinilt('<l ; (If ((/.) tluit it il(M'> iKii iiiinu' 111- (U'sci'ilic \\itl\ pi'ccisioiiaiiy [km'soii or lliiii;;; : " I'rnviiii'il iliat t lie justice iii;iy, il' s;iiisli('ii tluit it is iu'ci'ss;tr\' I'M' a i'air ti'iai. iirdci- iIkiI ;i parliciilar. rurllu'i' (U'sfriliiiig siicli incans. ])('rsnii. |)la<c ny lilill^•. lie fiirnislic(l liy ilic jifoscciitDr. All ap|iliialii>ii ini' |)ai'ticiilars is aildivssrd to tlu' judicial disci'c- lioii of the jn'csidiii^' judii'c or iiiaii'istratc, wlio will exercise such discrctioii upon ilie t'act> as ilicy arc uuide to apjicai' Ik'I'oi'c hiui. accordiii';' lo c>t;ili|i>|icd riilo ami judicial u>a!^c. (^1) rpoii ail applicalioii lor part iculars, ii should he >liowii that there is ivasoiialilc lu'cosiiy tor iiior<' spccilie iiit'oriualioii lli.iu is contained in the chariiH' as laid ; and. thcrelorc. whei'c in a case of enihc/./leniciit liie did'enihuit had aiiiplc time to no over iiis iioidis. which were to proNc his cinlic/./.lenicnt . hi-. ai)plication for a hill of |>arlicnlars wa^- denied. (2) The limit of the rii;-lil of a ileteiidanl to a hill of particulars has he II laid down, in an i'jiii'lish -Xisi Prius t-usr. to he that, on the one hand, the jiarticulars shall i;-ive him the same infonnaiioii whi<-h a special emint would i;'i\'e. and on the other hand thai the specilic acts wit h lime ami place need not he stated. (IJ) In a laler ca^c hcforc the l'!ni;'li>h ('oiirt oft^hieen's liemdi. it was held thal.<in a >|iecial count tor conspiracy aliening owrt acts, ihe coui't would not order iiarliciilars to he furnished, in the ahsi'iiccofan alhdavit hy t he defendant denying UnowK'd,i>'^' of the acts chare-ed and ot' vullicient informalioii lo eiiahle him to meet tliein. '■ 'I'he general principle " said Lord ( "oleridyc,' apjilii's only to this exteur. — to give sucii information a> is sullicicnt to enahlc the defendant faii'ly to defend himself wlu-n in court ; lull, on the ot her hand, not to fetter tlie proseciilor in the conduct of his case. (/i) (!) /)* i-c Taylor, 1.. H. 4 ('!<. lOH; Doherty v. Alman, L. K. ;'. App. 728. (:.'> Stato V. Miller, ;^. N. J. L. J. 3>^1. {:!) K. V. Hamilton, 7 C. iV: P. 4-18. (4) R. V. >tapylton, S I'o.'c ('. C. (;!>. ;{18 PUACTICAI, (illUE TO MAOISTIiATKS. S4T. Variant**'. — Xo objection sliall lu- allowed to any in- t'orinatioii. complaint, suinnions or warvanl tor any alloijod dot'eot therein, in suhstanco or in form, or for any variance lietween sucli information, complaint, summons or warrant and tlie evidence adduced on the part of the informant or I'cnnplainant at the hear- ing of such information or^com|)laint. 'I. .\ny variance between t lie inlorniation for any otlence or act punishable on sunnnary couvictiou and the evidence adduced in sujiport thereof as to the time at which suidi otl'enci^ or act is alleged to have been committed, shall not be deenuMJ material if it is proved that such infornuition was. in fad. laid within the time limited Ity law for laying the same. 3. Any variance between the information and the evidence ad- duced in support thereof, as to the place in which the olfence or act is alleged to liave been committed, shall not lie (U-emed material if the otlence or act is proved to have been committed within the jurisdiction of the justice l)y whom the information is heard and deternuned. 4. If any such variance, or any other \ariance between the information, complaint, summons or warrant, and tiie evidence adduct'd in support thereof. aj)pears to tlie justice present and act- ing at the bearing to be such that tlu' detendanl lias bei'ii thereby deceived oi' misled, the justice may. upon >ucli terms as he thinks til . adjourn I lie hearing of t he case to some I iii ure day. ' ' v It will lie sei'U by the lerms of Arliele .sS:.'. post, that evei'V objection to any information for any alleged defi-ct therein, in substance or in form, must be taken before liie magistrate at the cfimmencement of the trial, or it will be waived. And upon any ai)pea'. from any summary conviction or order, the case is. accord- ing to Article SS.;}. post, to lie heard and <lettM'mined upon the merits, notwithstanding any defect in substance or in form in the conviction or oi'der ajipealed from. The variance betwei'U the information laid anfl the evidence adduced, referri'd to in the above article. SIT. as iieing immaterial, is merely a ditference between the mode of slating and the mode of proving one and tiie same thing in substance ; and. therefore, where the evidence adduced establishes something entirely ditt'er- ent from that whiidi is cdiarged, the objection to the variance may I'KO( ri(IN(i ATTENDANCE (F WITNESSES. 319 li(- taki'ii iiiid :ill(>\vt'(l. As. if a dofi'iidaiit wove suinnumed i'or an assault, and the cvidi'iicc. instead of I'.italilisliiiig-any assault, showed lliat the dofi'iidanl had coiuinitted soiiu' slii'-iil daiuagc to proiirrty. lor which, it' cliai'ncd lli(.'i'i'with. hi- might liavc lict'u summarily tried, t he variance \\iiui(l lie a iijood uTound of ohjeclion. and oui^ht to be sustained. Where an i\irorrnation ditfers from the c\idence hy stating the com|ilainant> to hr ''r. l!. and his |iai'tnt'rs. " instead of an incor- porated eomiiany hy its ci(r|i(irate nanu' it is sue h a variance as is cure(l iiy the ahovc article. (1) .SlH. ^»iiiiiiii4»iiK 4»r Warrant to Witiit'NMOK. — .\ summons nniy he issued to procure tlu' attendance, on tlu' hearini;- ot any charge under the provisions of this ]iart. of a witness wiio resides out of liic jui'lsdiction of the Justices hefore whom such charge i> to \iv heard, and smdi summons and a warrant issued to ]>rocure the attendance of a witness, whetlicr in consequence of refusal hy su<-h \\itnc» lo ajipear in ohedience to a summons or othcrwi-e. may he respectively servi'd and e.\ccutcd hy the con- stal)le or uthrr peace otHcer l<i whom the same is doliveriul. or liy any other pei'son. as well heynnd as witliin t]\e territorial di\ision of the justice who issued the same. .S Ml. Ilcariii^' in he in 0]»«'ii <'<»iirt. — The room or ]ilacc in which the justice sits to hear and try any com|ilaint or information shall he deemed an open and puhlie couiM. to \vhi(di the puhlie generally may ha \c access so far as tiic same can con- veniently contain t hem. . .S.>0. <'4»iiiiM'l r«r I'articM. — Tlie person against wliom the complaint is made or infoi'mation laid shall he a(lmitte(l to malce his full answer and <lefence thereto, and to have the wit- nessi's e.\-amincd and ci'oss-exanunf'd hy counsel or attormy on his liehalf 2. Kvery eom|ilainant or inliu'nnint in any such case shall he at liberty to conduct th<' complaint oi- information, and to have the witnessi's cNamined and cross-e.\amine(l hy counsel or attorni-}' on his behalf. (1) See Wliittle v. Franklaad, 31 L. J. M. C. SI. ,'{2(» I'U AC I'lCAI, (UIHK I'll MAUISTIIAI'KS. \Vc liiivi' ali'i'iuly si'i'ii tliiit. uikIit si'dion 1 nl' llif Cunola Eri- dence Act ISJKl. (1; every iicrsmi (•li;ir<;t'(| with :iii ntlciici' :niil tlio liusliaiid nf will' of (lie iicrsoM I'liiirgi'd aiv (•(Hii|h'1ciiI \viliK's«ics. \\\\\ lIuTc is sonic (litlcvciici' ol' opinion as lo wlu'tlicr tliis section rcMilcrs a dct'endant coniiietcnt as a witness on iiis own hclialt'. wlicn ciiai'ii-ed witli an otlencc |mnislialile under a |ii'ovincial sta- tute oi' a nuinici|ial liye-law. wiien llierc is an alisence of |(rovin- ciai leyislaliou renderiuij liini so coni}ietent. Till' (lue-tion is of some iiici-ty and ini|iortance. and si-enis to dc- ]ii'iid upon the construction to lie plai'cd upon I he sections of l lie 15. X. A. Act reijulatinn' the resju'ctive powers of liie l»oniiiMon and Provincial le^'isiaturi's in relation to criminal law and pi'ocedure. In other words, doi's sulisection 27 of section Ml of the 15. N. A. Act. extend so far as to vest in the Dominion I'arliantent exclusive K'yislativc authority to regulate procedure, (including, of course, evidence, as a hrauch of jn'ocedurc). in relation to am. criminal offences, no mattt-r liy what authority piiuishalple. — that is. whe- ther punishahle l>y vivtui' of Domiinon. l'ro\incial. .Municipal oi- ot hei' laws '.■' ())•. is sulisection 1") ot' sect ion '.t'Jot'ihe 11. .\. \. \(-\. (which gi\es pro\incial legislatures authority to make laws im|)os- inglhe punishnn'iit hy tine. ptMialty, or imprisonment lor the en- forcement of jirovincial laws), to he construed as conferring on the [)rovincial legislatures the power to regulate ami fix the proce- dure in regard to oll'ences against provincial laws? .\nd. if this ho so, are there, therefore, as some have conteucled. two sets of ci'i- miiial olVences. — FK!)i:iiAi, crimes, and I'kovi.nciai. crimes ? Sec. 91, subsection 27, of the 15. .\. A. .\(t. declares that the ex- clusive legislative authority of the Dominion I'arliainent extends to all mattei's relating to the (MUMl.xAi. law. except tlu' constitu- tion of the ( 'ourts. luit including \\w ckockdihk in citiMiNAT. .mat- ters. This language is very broad, and certainly seems to cover ^iroce- dure in all criminal matters whatsoever ; ami. as sulisection 15 of section !t2 says nothing at all aliout ])roce(liire, i' seems that, in emjiowering provincial legislatures to impose a line (ir ju'iialty or iTn|»visonnieiit for infraction of provincial laws, it merely con I'ers (1) Seep. 204, anfe. KVIDENCE OF THE ACflSElt. 'A2\ Upon tlu' |>rovin(ial l('ii;isliitiirt!s a sPEmAL and mmited iuithority coiicurrciit witli and in aid of flic (ibnehal authority which the J)ominioii Parliament possi'sscs over all criminal mattors and cri- minal procedure. W'len. under tlu' limited uutliovity confenvd iii»ontheni, provin- cial legislatures impose, a tine, or a penalty or imprisonment, lor a disoliediencc of a |)rovineial law. (hey do not tlierehy cirate the criminal otience involvt'il in suidi disohedionce. IMHoheilienco of a statute is a crime under tlu- common law. It is a crime under the [feneral criminal law of the country : and tlie Criminal Code itself (hy ArticK' 1HS) expressly makes it an indictahle olVence to unlaw- fully disohey any .\c( of any liCgislalure in Canada, and enacts that the otlender shall lu- liahlo to one year's imprisonment, unless there is some other punishnu'ut e.\])ressly provided hy law. So, that, if the limitcti authority given to the provincial legisla- tures l)y the iV N. A. .Vet were not in e.Kistence at all, or. if.though in cNistence. it were not exercised, a contravention of a ]>rovincial statute would he punishahle under the general criminal law con- trolled liy the dominion I'ai'liamcnt. And. surely, the mere fact that the provincial legislatures are granted a limited right to the extent of fixing the |iunishment in the case of a criminal offence Avhi(di contravenes a ]>rovincial statute. — a limite<l right which docs not ovi'i'ride. hut is in aid of the general powers of the Dom- inion Parliament. — cannot give them tlie further right to regulate, in rcgai'd to sn(di otfenct^s, the criminal procedure, over which the ])ominion i'arliament is given exclusive control ; suel; exclusive eorttrol lieing .so given to the Dondnion Parliament in order, uo doul)t. to secure in the trial t)f criminal offences, uniforndty of pro- cedure and evidence all over Canada. It is not easy to reconcile tlie decisions in sonieof the cases which have arisen upon the (juestions involved in this suhject. and wliich are hrietly noticed helow. Mul there seems a good deal of reason in the contention tiiat when the suhject matter of a ])roceeding he- fore a Justice or a Magistrate is in the nature of a criminal offence, it should have applied to it the gi'ueral law of crinunal ]irocedure and evidence, whetlier it is liased upon an infraction of a jirovin cial law or otherwise. In .Roddv's case, the defendant wlio was accused, in Ontario, of :J22 I'HArTlCAl. (illDE Til M Ali ISTKATES. K(>lliii<;' iiiloxiciiliiiu,' lii|iii>i- nil ,-1 Siiiwliiy. in vinlitiinii ot' (lie Licniso Ai'(. :;? \'ict. (Oiil.). <•• •'{2. si'cs. 2H iS: .•',4. wiis cniivicti'd nf tlic nf- f'l'iicc DM liis own cvidi-ncf ; tlic |ir<isi'ciilion luivini;' ciilli'd liiin as a ■witness (iiy-aiiist liis own |ir(>(fst), nndcr t lie iiulliority of .'{(i N'ict. (Onl.). <■. 1(1. sec. i. rcndi'i'in^ a defendant a coiiiiirtcnl and com- PEl.LAHLE witness in any niatlfi'. not iieinu a ( rime ; tlic |iosilioii laio'M ln'inu; tliat a violation of tlu' iici-nsf laws ivas not a (cinii'. but a nil"*' violation of |H'ovin(ial laws. In a|i|n'al. tlic (|Hfsiion Avas tlioiou^Idy ii'onc into ; and Harrison. ('. ,!.. in rcndcrini,' tliii judtfnicnl of the ( 'onrt (|nasliinu; tlic coii\ictioii rcfcri'cd to sec. !)], siili-scr, 27 of the I}. N, .\. Act. ami said tlial. as tlic iirovincia! Ic- yislatui'cs iiavc no direct power to le<fislatc citlii'r as to crime or criminal iiroccdnrc, t lie ijiicstion was wlietlicr the (diari^c at;'ainst tlic (jcfcndaiit was a cliai'n'c of crime or nol. lie tlieii ijiiolcd from I'aley on ( 'onvictions as tollows : — • Tlic (|Ucstioii. wliat is a crimi- nal |>roceedin^ as tlie siiliject of summary coiix'iction dcjiciids on the maniu'r in wlii(h the Legislatui'e have created the cause of coiii|ilaiiit. and for this |iur|iosc the scope iiiid olijcct of the sialiite as well as the lan::-uage of I he jiarticnlar enact men 1- >houl<l he con - sidei'cd. As a n'cncral I'ulc. every |iroceediiin' licforc a .Maii,'isi rale where he has [lower to conoict. — in cont radisiinciion to t he [lowcr ot' makinij an order. — is a criminal procct'din;;-. whether the .Manistrate he autliori/.ed. in the lirst instance, (o direct payment of a sum of money as a penally, or. at once, to adjudy-c tlic defendant to he inijirisoncd ; and il must he hoi'iie in mind thai where a statute ordi'fs. eiiioins. or proliiiiits an act. every disohediciicc is jninishahle at common law hy indictment . In su(di cases, the addition of a ]ienalty to he recovered hy sumniaiy conviction can hardly pre- vent I he |)roceediii>i' from heiiiix a criminal one, ' (1) After reviewing a iiumher of decisions as to what jiarticnlar otieiices are crimes, the learned chief justice conclmleil that the otfeiice of selliii;;; li(|Uor on Sunday heing one of pnhlic interest and heiiig |iiinislialile hy tine or imiirisonment with hard lahour. it was so tar of a criminal nature thut tlu' defendant ought not to have heeii compelled to give evidence against iiimself. under the author- (1) laley Sum. Conv., 5 Ed. tlL', 113 ; ti Ed. p. 1J8 ; .See K. v. J.I., Glouces- tershire, L. R. 4 Q. B. -l-l'y ; ;J8 h. .1. M. (X, 73. ■ KVIDENOE OK TUB A("CUSBD. S23 itv of a provinciiil stiitutc n'tidi'i-iii^ him coinpoloiit Jiiid 0(imiu'lla- lilf as a witness ill any iiiatU'i- not iuMni; a criiiu'. (1) In Knuland. tlic |uirti»'s and tlu' linsl)ands or wivi-s of (ho parties loan aetinii or civil proceeding are competent witnesses on their own ludialf or t'oi- or against each otlier, hut they are not cf>mpe- t*'nt, as a general rnk'. in any criminal procccdinn's whether triahle on indictment or snmmai'ily ; (2) and tlie (jiiestion (d' whether a defendant coidd lie cxamine(| as a witness in a proceedin;^- hefore a justice or a magistrate has heen ln'ld. there, in a numher of cases to di'pi'ud uit,>n the further (|Ucstion whether it was a criminal proceediu";' in wliich the detendaut was chai'ged with c(nunntting an olVi'iici- punisluil)le on summary conviction. h'oi- instance, wliere a licensed piildic house kiH'pei" was prosecuted, under tin- Enfj,-|isli I,i(|Uor i.icensi' liaws, for uniawfidly pi'miittinu; personscd' notoriously hail ( haractei- to assi-mldo tog-etlier in his house, against the tenor of his license, it was liohl tliat he was not a comjietent witness ; Wiglnman. .!.. hcing of opiidon that the slat nte treated the otl'encc a> a crime. (.! ) In a case auainsi a physician idiarged witii violating a law of the ]iroviiicc of ()ntario. hy piai'tising without heing n'gistei't'd. it was Jield that, as this was aei'ime. the defendant coidd not he a witness under Md \'ic. c. lO. sec. 4. (Out.) (4) In anollier Ontario case, the dcfcn(lant was (duirged with the violation of a minncipal hy-law. and, as the act c<>mplained (d' was a crinnnai otfence. he was held incompetent to give e\ideiM-i'. (.">) fn a recent casi'. u|ion tlie trial, hefore a police magistrate, id' an (dfence against a city hy-law in erecting a wooden huilding within the tire limits, the defendant was eonnudled to give evidence under (1) U, V. Uoddy, 41 U. ('. Q. 15. '.'fll. (2) 14 & 15 Vict. V. it!t, sees 2 & :i, (Imp) ; 16 ct- 17 Viet., c. 83 (Imp). (3) Parker v. (ir^en, 9 Cox V. C. Kit); 2 B. & S. 299; :!1 L. J. M. C. 133; See Catell v. Ireson K. J{. iV; K. Ml ; 27 L. J. M. C. 1G7 ; Atty.-Gen. v. Radlotf, 10 p]xch. 84; 23 L. .T. Exch. 240, S. C; Atty.-Gen. v. Sillem .32 L. .7. Exch. 92, 101 ; Mellor v. Denluim, r, Q. B. I). 467 ; R. v. Whitclnirch, 7 Q. B. L). 534 ; Atty.-Uen. v. Bradlaugli, 14 (.}. B. D. <!(i9 (4) K. V. Sparham, 8 0nt. Uep. 57(1. (5) R. V. McNiclioll, 11 Ont. Kep. <i59. 324 PRACTICAL (iriDK TO MAUISTM ATES. sec. n. Ii. S. ().. c. (il, wliicli fiiiicts iliiit H|ii>ii tin' triiil lu'tni-c :iiiy justice of tlu' |iciicc. Miiiyor. or police in:in'isli-ale of any matter or (inestioii 7iot beiruf a crime, the party opjiosiiii;- or ilefciKliiii!,- shall he com]ieten1 and compellahle to i^ive cviilence : ami. the defemhint beinn' convictcil, it was helii iylln' Common IMca- hivisioii. in linashini!,' tiie eonxiction. that an ort'enee ai.'^ainsl the hy-law iiM(ues- tion was a criminal oll'eiu'e, and that theri'fore tin defendant was not a com|ietcnt nor ci>m|iellahle witness. \ 1) in a still nioi'e recent case, howi'ver. a dili'ereni dcciMon .seems lo have lieen ari'i\'edat. A defendant wa^ convicted, hy the police inaji'ist rale of Toronto, on a (dnir:;'*' ot selliuii' inio.\icatinii' licpior without a license, (coiit rary to sec. 7" of the Liquor License At't, li. S. ()., e. ]!I4). I'lKUi a motion to (puish the conviction, on the ground o. Cfcndant's e\idence on his own ludi.-ilf haviuii' hecn vejecled. it was contended for the (h'fendant. t hat he was a com- l»etent witnes v.ndi'r sec. 114. H. S. ('.. v. Hm; [The, Canada Tem- per ance Act) : hut it was eontendiMl for the prosecution that si'c. 114 of the Canada Temperance Act was ultra vires ot' the honunion J*iii'liainenl, and that ihe )iro\ince alone has the riiihl to re<i'ulate the proceilure under the Licpior l.iceuse Act ; and the Common JMeas l>ivision ((iait. C. .1., and .Mc.Mahon, .L). held that, notwith- standing the reservation of crinnnal pioccdui'c to the Dominion Pavliann'Ut. hy suhsection 27 id' section HI ot the 15. N. A. Act. a ]»rovincial Icii-islature has ])ower to reuulati' and provitle for the courseof trial and adjudication of otVeiu'cs ayainst ilslawfnl enact- ments, sucdi as a In-each of the Lii|iu)r License Law. even tlionyh HUeh ott'ences nniy he termed erinus. and tiiat therefore they liavo power to ri'n'nlate theifiving of evidence l)y t lie defendant in sncli il case, as is done hy II. S. ( ).. c, (!L set. !t. hy jirovidiny; that where the )iroceedin!i' is a crinu' under the jiroxineial law. tlie defendant is neithi-r a competent nor ecunpellalilc witness. (U) H!it. Witii«>NM«>.s to !>«' fWiiiiiiiK'il on 4latli or AflinilHlioil. — Kvei-y witness at any heariuir shall i>e examine<l U|ton oath or allirniation. and the justice hefore whom any witiu'ss (1) R. V. Hart, 20 Ont. Uop. (ill. See R v. VVasoii. 1 7 .Vpp. Uep. (Out.) 221 ; K. V. l)lInnin^^ 14 Ont. Rep. 52. (2) H v. Hittle, 21 Ont. R. im. I'ROCEKDING IN DEFKNDANTS AHSENCE 1^25 appears t'ov the i»ur|i()st' ol' hciiii^ cxainiiuMl sliall liavc full |i(>\vi'r and authority to administer to ovory witness tlie usual oath or artirmation. (1) H!i'£ l<]vi<l«'ii<«<' of F:K(>iii|»li4»iiK aiBil F<K«*«>|»(ioiiN. — 1 1' the inforrnation or complaint in any case ni'iiativcs any exemption, exception, proviso or condition in the statute on which the same is founded it shall not \k' necessary for tlu' prosecutor or complainant to prove sucli negative, hut the defendant may jtrove the atlirinative tlu'reof in his defi'iice if he wishes to avail him- self of the same. HHit ^'4»ll>A|»|»«'ai*ail<'«' of* AccIIMImI. — In case the ac (•used doc> not appear at the lime and |>lace aiPi>ointc(| hy ;iny sum-mons issued hy a justici' on infornnition hefore him <d' the commission of an otVence punishahle on sumnnii'V conviction, then, if it appears to the satisfaction of the justice tlnit the summons was <l\dy served- a reasonahle time hcfni-c the linic foi' appeai'auce. su(di justice may |)roeeed e.r jiarte to hear and determin.' the case in the absence of the defendant, as fully and elfecinally. to all inients and purposes, as it' the defendanl had personally appeared in ohedienci' lo stiidi summons, or the justice may, if he lliiid<s lit, issue his warrant as provide(| hy section 7^{V,i of the Code, (2) and adjourn the liearinu,' of the complaint or uiforination until tiie defendant is aiijirehended. Met'ore proeeedin<;- in the ahsenee of the did'endant, as provided hy this article, the service and manner of service of the summons should lie sworn lo. and llie Justice slnuild he satistied that a reasoualde time Iwis elapsed since the service to enahle the (h'teml- ant to oiiey it. He should have strong grounds for comdudiug that the summons has reached or come to tlu' knowledge (d" the defendant, and that he is wilfully disoheying it ; and thei'videiice to satisfy him of this should he miudi stronger wjicre thi' sumin(U\rt was not sei'ved p<'rsonally than where it was served [H'i'>onally. (1) As to the different modes of adniiniHtorin^ the oatli to Miit the ro- hjrious persuasion of the witness, and as to the eases iu wlroh the wit- ness may aHirm instead of sweariii}:, see pp. l'06-2(iy, ante. (2) yee pp. Iii8-10",», ((«<<■. 32fi PRACTICAL (IITDE TO MAGISTRATES. (1) III I'iisi' ot (loul)t. tin' otlu'i' course of issuing' a waiTaul should 1h' taUi'U. An inroniiatiini was, on the i)tli of .Mai'cli. laid aii'ainsi tiic df- fondaiit for an assault alli'g('(i to luivi- lu^eii coiuiniltcd (in the (itii of till' sainr month; wlnTcupon thi' Jiis'ticos issui'd a sunnnons, wliifdi was. on liic Knli, left at the house of the dct'cndant's mother, w Ik re he li\'ed n\ hen at home. I poll the return of tiie summons on the 12th. the defeii<lant did ni>t a|)|>ear, and tlu' ease was lieard e.r parte: ami the defendant was convicted and sentenced to si.\ luoiillis' ini|)risoniiient witii liard laliour. 'I'iie defendant heing afterwai'd- a|p|>reheiide(l u|ion a warrant umU-r tliis coiuiction. a vule for a cirtiorart was mo\-ed tor to hring up the conviction in order thai it might he (|iiaslieil upon tin- ground of want of Juris- diction in the justices to make it. Tiie ground of tlu' motion was thai I he det'eiidanl had not luH'ii legally served with the summons. It appeared that lie was a lishermaii. and on I he Hth of .March (the <lay oil \\hi(di llie summon-- was applied tin- and the ilay liefori' it was >er\cd) he wciii to sea and reiiiaineil on hoard a lugger, tishiiig olVihc coast, until the l.'illi of Mandi. when he landed and was immeiliately arreste(| upon the warrant issued under \\\v e.v //arte conviition. lie denied that he had any knowledge of thi' sum- mons having Ikh'Ii issueil (U* served until after iiis comietion, ami there wa- additional in idence of the summons not having come to his know ledge. In support of the eoiivietiou.it was argued that the ((Uesiion of the sultieieiiey of (lie service of the siiniinoiis was one entirely for tlu' justieos. and that, according to tlio cases o| |{. V. l-",\aiis and <iale. and Re Williams, the service was sulHiMeiit. The court, however, were unanimous in their judgment that the st-rvice was liad. ( "o(d<hurii, .1., in deliviM'iiig judgment, said: '" This is a \ery ilangercuis I'xi'rcise id' power on the jiart of the magistrates. Tlie alternative c(Mirse of issuing their warrant to appndiciid the deleiidant and liriiig him In-fore them to answer tlie eoin|(laiiit would have heeii much safer. They ought not to l"ivi' acted as they have doiu' unless they were certain that the .man was keeping out of the way in order to e\ade service of the summons. ■^- ■'• ■■' It is true tliat the latter part id' section (1) R. V. Sm 1 1, I-. K., Ill Q. H , (in4 ; K. v. Malej, 17 (). K. 1!»4 ; h'ead v. Hunter. S V. I.. T. 4L2. I'ROCKEDLNii IN DKFENDANTS AllSENCE. .'527 i oftlu' 11 and Vl \\c. c. 4;!, i)rnvi(los (hat. if tlu' parly siuiini(>Mc<l tails t(i appear, tlicn. if it lie prDVcd on oath or attirniation. lo the Jnslicc orJiis1i<H's then jirt'scnt. that such suninions was duly scrvi'd upon such party a rcasonaldc tinu' bi'foiv the day so appointtul for his a.ppcarancc. as atorcsai<l, it sliall he hnvful for such justice oi' justices of the peace to |»roceed ex iiarte and adjudicate as if su(di pai'ly had |iersonally apjiearcd : hut, on tliat, I think it siiould he shown that the circumstances were such, and tiiat the lime lictween the leaving- of the summons and the time appointed for ap)iearance were su(di as to lead to the conclusion thai I lie summons must ha\e reached the defendant.' (1) It thus appears to lie well estahlislu'd that, to ;^'i\'e Justices jur- isdiction to jiroceed ex jiarte on the non-appearance of the delcii- dunt, it must appear that the summons has liecn either scr\cil personally, or has heen left with some pers((n for him at his last (U' mo~^l usual |dace of ahinle. and that, in the latter ca>e. t here are circumstances to lead to the conclusion that the summons must have rea(du'd the defendant. it also appears that, where 1 he casi' is not within the opei-ation of the < 'ode. and where in that case there is no mode of ser\ice of the summons jirovided ior hy the statute under \vhi(di the ]u-o- cei'tliiii;' is taken, tiu' service of the summons must lie persdual. so as to autiu»ri/e the justices to proceed ex parte. It is laid 'lown in Burn. iJoscaveii. Nares. and other text hooks, that persniiid ser- vice of the summons is necessary, unless nhere it is ex}>re.islu dis- jicnsed with by statute. (2) Tile .lustices must determine what is a reasonahle lime ot service (having- regard to the nature ami circumstances of tlie charge against thi' defendant), and also as to tiie sutllciemy of the ser- vice : hut the (hdendant's apjiearance will, as a ruK'. he a wai\-er of iiny irri'gularily in (he service. (;i) Still, the time allowed hetween (he .service and the hearing must he surticient for the defendant to prepare his defence. For instance, (1) AV William Smith, 3:.' ].. T. N. S., 3il4 ; 'M J. P. '292, :V22. {2) Per Bay ley, .1., in K. v. Hall (1 D. & K. M ; and Parker ].. C. .1 , in K. V. Simjison, U) Mod. 'M'l. (i) H. v. Joluiaoji. 1 8tr., L'lil : K. v. Stone, 1 Kast, (i4U; ex parte Hopwood, 19 L. J. M. C, 197 : U. v. Williams, L>I L. J. M. C, 4li. 328 I'RACTrCAI, CHIDE TO MAGISTRATES. ii --uiiiinniis. ciillinn' u|ioii ;i (li't'ciidaiil to ;n»l>;';ir ;it 8.;}0 A.M.. tin u I'l'i'tain day. was siTvcd at I l'..M.. on tlu' previous day, aiul, at S.L") A..M. <m lln' day ti.Ncd lor llic dclVMidaiit's a|)]K'araiicc. two othrr suiuinoM.si's tor similar otVciicrs wcro .si-rvi-d iT(|uirini;- tlu' dct'i'u- daui to aii|K'ar ln't'orc liic .Mai^'isti-aii' at A. .M. on t hr same (lay. Wlu'ii lin'('iuirl nirt. ihr lirst case was coninuMncd. Iiul lic- t'oi'c ii was rloscd tiu' jn'osccntor aslvt'd tlu- Manisl rate to takr up t iir oilici' I wo casi'.-. Tlic di'l'endant sai<l 1k' had not undcr^iood t iir niraniiii;' of till' -fcond summons, as it was siT\-('d wliilc he was in tlicact of K'a\ini;' lionic to allcnd tlic first case ; and. I>y liis connscrs ad\ii('. lie refused to plead. 'JMu- Magistrate entered a plea, in eaeli ease, of not guilty, and proceeded with liot li cases, the defendant ami his counsel remaining in Cmirt awaiting the completion id' the exideuce in the lirst I'ase. hut refusing to ])lead or take any part in the second and third cases, or to ask for their adjouviinieiil . .\fter hearing all (lie evidence in the lirst case, the -Magistrate, al llie rei|Ue^t of I he detendant. adjoui'iicd that case, hut. in each of the other case> he proceeded to a< mviction. It was held that tlie procei'dings were contrary to n-.M.."il pistiiH'. the sunimonses lieingserved almost iiuiuediati'ly b'i'ore il'e sitting of ihe( 'ourl. at wlii(li tlu' defendant had ali'ead, lu'eii sumiu. :"'d to attend; and the ciuivictioiis were ([uashed with costs against the jirosecutor, (1) M>>4. ^'4»ii-»|»|»caraii«*t' of l*i*OMi'cut4»r. — If. upon the day and at the place so appointed, the dtd'endant ajipears volun- tarily in (diedienee to the siunnious in that lieluilf served u|)on liim. or is hrought hefore the justice l>y virtue of a warrant, then, it tlu' conii»lainant or informant, having had diu' notice, (hx's not appear hy himself, his counsel or attorney, the Justice shall dismiss the complaint or information, uidess ho thinks projier to adjourn the hearing of the sanu' until some other day, upon such tornis as lie thinks lit. <S{S*1. Pro('«MMliii)i-H %%'lioii lluf li Pairtit'M A|»|>(Mir. — It liotii jiarties appear, eitlier personally or by their respect- ive foiNSEi, OK ATTORNEYS, before the justioo Avho is to hear and il) R. V. Kli, 10 Out. R. 727. ARKAKINMENT OF ACCIJSKD. 320 ili'tt'i'iniiu' tlif ((iiiipliiiiit or inroriiialioii. >iicli justice shall procci'd to hear ami (k'tt'i'iiiiiic the saim-. The a|i|i('araiicc dt' liDih (irriiluT pai'ty may lu' liy coimst'l or at- tiirncy willmiit |ii'i)nt' of the srrvicr of t he siiiiimous ; (1) and will ln' sutlicii'iit 111 warrant the Jiistico in in'oe-t'eding to the hearini;;. iink'ss thi'iT i>- any special pi-nvision to the contrary in the statute on which the inl'orniatiiin is laid. (2) The (let'endant's appearance, either liy hini-eU'iir ins atlnriu'y. waives all irn'i;-ularity in tiie ser- vice of the warrant nr summons, or e\H'n tlu' want of one. ('.)) H!i^. ArraiiK'Hiiiciii **t' A<'4*iik«'(1. — If the defendant is jivesent lA the heariuii'. tlu' sulivlance of the information oi- coni- pl.iinl shall he stati'd (o him. and he >hall he asked if he lias any cause to >ho\v w hy he should not In' con\ ieled. or why an order sho\dd not he made ayainsi him. as the case may he. 2. If the defendant thereupon adud-^ the truth of the infoi'ma- tion or complaint, and shows no siitticient cause why lie should not he convicted, or why an order sliould not lu' made aii'ainst him. as the case may lie. tlie Justice present at the hearing shall convict him or maUe an order against him accor<lingl\ , 3. If the defendant (hn's not admit the truth of the information (M- complaint, the justice shall prot eed to inquire into tlii' charge, and. for tlie purpose of su(di inquiry, shall take the evidence of witnesses lioth for the coin]>lainant and accuseil in the manner provided hy Part XLV. in the ease of a jn-eliminary inquiry. (4) Provided that the prosecutor or com|)lainant is not entitled to give evidence in reply if the did'endant has not adduced any evidence other than as to his general character; provided further, that in a hearing under this section the witnesses need not sign their depositions. HH7- AdjouriiiiU'iit. — Mefore or during the hearing of any information or complaint the Justice may, in his discretion adjourn the hearing of the same to a certain time and place to he (1) Ejc parte Hopwood, 10 L. J. M. C. 197, 15 Q. B. 121. (2) Bessell v. Wilaon, 22 L. J. M. C. 94 ; 1 E. & B. 489. (3) R. v. Aiken, 3 Burr. 1785. (4) See p. 2(t3. ante. .33,0: PRACTICAL (illDj: Td MAOISTKATES. llioii iippoiiitoil and stali'tl in tin- invst'iico jiiid licariiiy <>f the pai-ty or parties, or of tlu'ir ri'spi'ctivi' solicitors or agents tiien present, but no such aajournment shall be for more than eight days. 2. It', at tlie time and plaee to whicli tlie hearing' <>r i'lirther liearini;- is adjoui'ned, eillu'r or l)OlIi of tlu' |)arties do not a])pear, jtersnnaiiy or liy his oi* tlieii' cDunsei or solicitors respectively, liet'ore the justice or such other justice as shall then he tlu'i'e. the justice who is then there may proceed to the heai-inti' or further heavint"- as if the party or parties were jiresent. '.]. If the prosecutor or complaiinint does not appear, tin- justice luav dismiss the infoi'uiation. with or without costs, as to him seems tit. 4. Wheiu'vev any justice adjourns tlie hi'arini>- ot" any case, he may sutler the defendant to i^o at large or nuiy commit him to the common gaol or otlier jirison within the lerritoj-ial division for which such justice is then acting, or to such ofhei- safe custocly as su(di justice thinks tit. or may dischaige the defendant upon his recouni/.ance, with or without suivtii's. at the discreliou of siu-h justice, conditioned for his appearand' ai the time and place to whiidi s\udi hearing or further heai'ing is. adjourned. 5. AVheneverany defendant who is discharged u|(ou recognizance, or allowed to go at large, does not ap|>eai' at the time mentione(| in the recognizance or to which the hearing or further hearing is adjourned, the justice nniy issue liis warrant for his apprehension. Adjournments cannot exceed eight days, I'ven with the consent of all parties. (1) Hut if an adjournment for longer than the prescrihed ])eriod is made at the defendants request, and he afterwards attend on the resumed jiroccedings. and take his i hance of. and urge a dismissal of the charge, upini the merits, lie will beestop])ed from afterAvurds ohjecting that suidi resumed ))roceedings were illegal hy reason of the adjournment heing for longer than the j)rescrihed period. (2) And it has been held in Manitoba that tlie absence of a formal a<l- (1) R. V. Fre-'ih, 13 Ont. R. 80. (2) R. V. lleuerman, lo Ont. R. 010. HEAHINO AND ADJi; I)It'ATl<i.\. ;J31 joiiniiiu'iit <if'llu' |ir<)C(H'(lini!;s licforc a miiu'i-^ti'iile inav he wuivcil li_v llic ili'Tciiilaiit's siilisi'iiiu'iit a]i[K'araiu'i'. (1) Tlif ailjniiniiiR'iit of the lu'aviii<f ul' tlic case is ciitirfly in tli<- Jiislici-'s discretion, ami may lake place iimk'i' sevi'i-al ilitt'ereiit, cir- cumstaiu-es. iiaiiiel\ : I. Hel'ore or lini'iiio' tiie lieariiii;-. whereuiion tlie (leleiidaiil is >et a( large, oi- committed, or released, ii-iving hail for his future aiipearauci- : 2. Where the ilefendaut iloes not appear uj)on I lie summons, and a warrant is granted, and he is a|)preheu<led and hrought lielore the justice, who ihei-enpon orders hini to he kojit in custody ami liroughl u|) at a future time, of wliich ihe coDipiainant or informant is lo have notice ; and l ju-n. if the latter do not appear hy him.-elf or his attorney, the Justice may dismiss the ( hnrge. nnle>s for sonu' reason he thiuUs proper to adjourn upon su(di terms as he thinks tit. in which case I he defendant is. (••Mumilted or hailed ; and. :!. Where, upon the lu'aringany variance hetwecn the infornuilion. or com|dainl. or summons or warrant ot' a|)])i'(diension. and the i-vidence adduced on the part of the com- plainant or informant shall appear to the justice to have deceived or misled the did'endant. tlie Justice may njion sucdi terms as he thinks Hi adjourn the hearing, in wln'eii case tlie defendant is eom- mitteij or hailed. .Vs lo the separate trial .d' youtliful otlenders. and the necessity tor keeping yiuilhful (dfendcrs. wlK'n in cu.stody. separate aud apart tVom older pei-sons ciiarged with or convicted of crime, see r)7-:»s \'ic. ( . -j.s. wiii(di is set out in full in tiie A] )pen(l i x. ;)os^ aud sections ] and 2 of whi"li are noted at ]>p. ;j<H-;^02, ante. HUH, A«ljii4li<>Htioii hy JiiHti«*«> Tlie justice, having lu5ard what each |)arty has to say. au<l the witne.s.ses and evidence adduced, siudl consider the whole matter, and. unles.s otherwise provided, determine the same and convict or make un order against the (lefenchmt. oi- disjnisH the information or complaint, as the ca.se may he. We have ali-eady seen that, at common law. justices have no jur- sdiotion to ccmvict summarily, in any ease, but that distinct legis- (1) He Bibby, 6 M. L. R. 472. 09 ;j.>_ PRACTICAL GirilK TD MACJISTRATES. lativi' ur.tlidiMty nuist \)v given to iK-al witli a case suimiiarily ; (1) altlumgli.as wo have also socn. IIk' justifi's may procfcd summarily, wlicrc. owiiio- to some omission in tlic statuU'. tlic |ii)\\cr of sum- mary trial and conviction is not given exprfsslij. it' iVoni (he rest of the statute it may be reasonably implied that such jurisdiclion was intended to lie given to tliem. (2) The adjudication is contined within the limits o| the information or i'om])lainl. (sul)j(.'ct however to tlie jtrovisions of Articli' S4". relating to variances between the informalion ami tlu: evidence adduced). Tluis. where on an a|ij)lication for sureties to keep the peace, an assault as Avell as a threat was proved and the Justices not nnl\ ordered ihe defendant to find sureties, but also, notwithstand- ing the jM'ote.-t of the complainant, convicted the defendant of the assault, a certiorari was granted to (piash the conviction. (.!) After tlie evidence has been ailduced and tlu' case heard and ■closed, the justices may a<ljourn the adjudieation and determination of the charge ; but in that case they should name a day for deliv- ering their judgmi'iit. For. the defendant is entitled to be present .at the rendering of the judgment, in order to protect his rights. In a case tried in Nova Scotia under the Liquor License Act. the magistrate, at the close of the evidence, adjourned the case for judgment, without fixing any particular day. On a subsequent day. he gave notice in open court that he would give judgment on the next day. The defendant appeared on the day so named for judgment, and was convicted after being called and examined as to a previous conviction ; his attorney not being present. Held, that the conviction was illegal, because the case liaving been closed, there could be no adjournment for the adduction of further evi- dence, and also because the defendant should have been first found guilty of the offence under consideration, before being questioned as to the previous conviction. (4) (1) See Ayard v. Cavendish, Saville, 134, and other authorities cited at p. 21, ante, (2) See Cullen v. Trimble, and other authorities cited at p. 21, ante. And for full comments and authorities as to the general powers, duties and res- ponsibilities of justices and police magistrates, see chap. Ill, pp. 18-57 ante. (3) R. v. Deny, 20 L. J. M. C. 189. And see R. v. Soper, 3 B. & C. 857. (4) R. V. Gough, 22 N. S. R. 516. oowicTFOx, 333 'Plif iuljiiuniiiu'iil li'i' ili'livci'iiig jiidifinciit is iiol. like iKljouni- tnoiits. 1)0 ton- or (liii'iiin- t lit' Iriiil. liiintcil It) ('iy,'h( ihiys ; I nit iikiv I if tor a loii^or ]K'rioil. ( 1 ) » .S5!l. Foi'iil <»!' €'4»ilvi<'tioii. — If thf justifc cnnvicts t-i- iniiki's an t)nlfi' iin'ain-l till' tlcl'cuilaiil. a iiiiiiutc tn' ini'intu-aiKliiiu tlicrctit' shall tiikv lif luaiU'. — t'oi' wliicli iit) IVc shall hf |)aiil. — ami the convict ion tir tu'ilci' shall at'tcrwarils he ilrawii up hy the Just ice. on iKirclunont or |ia|K'i'. umlcr his jianil ami seal, in such om- of the forms of conviction lU' of i>rilci' from \'\. tt) AAA, inclusive, in ,sciiKi)ii-E ONK t)f the ( 'title. (2) as is a|)]>licahle to the casi-. or tti the like etlcct. - The minute t)r meintiramlnm of the fonvictitih tir ortler. as the case may he, is here reiiuii'ed to he niatlc. at once, that is. immc- tliately u]ion the JiuluMiu'iit jiromiuiicing the coiivictit)n or order heiiiy reiith'retl ; antl this iiiiniite t)r memoramliim shtnild stati'. in suhstance. the wlitile of the ailjuilicatitui of the justice, as to the l>unisliiiu'nt intlitteii. or the line tir penalty, or the aintiunt o1' money ortleri'd to he jiaitl tir tiic thing t)rdercd to ho dtmo. antl tlio mode of onftircing it. whether hy distress or imprist)nmont. (;>) For. tho conviction tir tinier, which is the formal ri'ctirtl. is tti he hasotl ujitm tho minuti'. It is inerely a short statt'inont in writing in any form of wtirds, such as thi' folhiwing ; •■ 1 find tlio defendant guilt}^ of the assault herein charged against him. and adjudge him to jiay a fine of ten dtillars, together with costs tti tho amount of four tlolhirs. antl that in default of payment ho he iniprisoneil for one month." The defendant is entitled, under tho ahove Article, to tho minute or memonindum of the conviction or order, without any fee. The judgment in case of a conviction consists of two parts namely, the atljndicath)!! of conviction, and the sentence or award of ])unishment. WluM-e the nuigistrale imposes a fine ami fixes an imprisonment which are within his (liscretion and jiowor. the formal convictitm (1) R. V. Hall, 12 P. li. 142 ; R. v. Alexander, 18 Oat. R, 169. (2) For Forms VV, to A A A, see pp. 375-381, post, (■i) R. V. Perley, 25 S. C. N. B. 43. 384 PHAOTIOAI, mi UK I'o MAdlMUAl'KS, must (.■nrrf>|i(iii(l witli the ;iiljii<lifii(i(iii ;is coiiiiiincd in l\\v iiiiiiutc or iin'iuovaiKlmu ri'quircd to In- insKk- nl tlu' ri'iidcfiiii;- of (In- jiidi;-- iiu'iil . lirciinsc it must lie iiccdi'diiiy; ti> I lie tiict. iiiid 'lie liict is :is slinwii liy till' minute or mfmoriimlum. (1 ) V Ai'ticli' IIS2 of t 111' ( 'o(U' di'cliiri's tliiit till' scvci'mI I'orms in srlic- diile one t lici'c'to. Viiricd to suit tlu- ciisi'. or forms to tlic lii\i' ctVcct, shall lie diH'MU'd i^ood. Vidid. and sullicicut in law. Tlu' conviction must show the place for which tlu' justice acts; and it must also show eitiu'V ll\at the ott'ence, (d' whicli the olt'ender is convicted was committed within the limits of the justices' jui'is- dictiou ortliat there are special facts, — whicii must he mentioned. — <>-ivinii: luvisdiction heyond those limits. (2) For instance, in eases of jui'isdiction j^'iven, to justices of the territorial division in which th>' olleuder is t'ound. over an otl'ence committeij in another teri'i- toi'ial division, it will he ni'ci'ssniy to mention wheri' the (dVenee was committeil and tlu- fact ot' the person accused of the otVence being found within the linnts i>\' the convicting justices' jurisdic- tion. ('^) l-'or. an Act which declares that, '■ an otl'ence or a cause of complaint shall he di-emeil to havt' heen comnntted or to have arisen eithei- in the place where the same was actually committed or arose, t>r in any place in which the person changed or eoni]>lained a,a;ainst is found or happens to he, " does not n'ive justices jurisdic- tion to convict a person summoned t'l'oni heyoml their jurisdiction for an otl'ence that has taUen place out of their jurisdiction; for (such person hy appearing in answer to their summons is not found and does not happen iobeM such jilace and within their jurisdiction. (4) Where the offenders were taken on hoard a smuggling hoat within the harbor of Folkestone, — which luul an exclusive local jurisdiction, — and were afterwards taken, with the boat, to the port of Dovei', and convicted before two justices of that port and town, the conviction, which merely stated that the offenders had been found in a l)oat in the harbor of Folkestone, was held to be- (1 ) R. V. Hartley, 20 Ont R. 485. (2) R. V. Young. 5 Ont. R. 400. (3) Re Peerless, 1 Q. B. 143, l.i4. (4) .Johnson v. Colam, L. R. 10 Q. B. 544 ; 44 L. J. M. C. 185. CONVICTION. 335 1)1x1, US not sliowiiiii; jiifisdiclioii. The Just ici's of Kolkcsloiic iiloin' hiid authority to convicl. tlioy lieiiifi; the jiistici's ot' tlic tirsi |iort or ]iliiii' into wliicli till' vi'ssi'l was oarricd. (1) Ir tlic law undci" wliicli tlic iirocccdiii^'.- art' laUcii is dirt'ctt'il au,ainst a parlicular il('scrij)tion of jicrsons. tlic conviction, in si-t- tiuii' out t lie (dVcnco. must show that the ddcndant is willun tlic (k'scriptioii of |n'rsons aifuinst whom tlic law is directed. So that, where. Milder liic i)y-iaws of a town, no transient trader or other person. occu|iyiiiii; a place <d' linsiness in the town for ;i temporary period of k^ss than a year anil not duly entered on the asst-ssmi'iit roll foi' the cnrri'iit year, was allowed to olfi-r goods for sale within the limits of the town, without having a license, it was held, ujion a cf)n\iction ohtained nmler this bj'-hiw, that Ihi' omission in the conviction of an allegation that the defendant was a transient trader not duly entered (in the (hS'St<vient roll for the current year was fatal. (2) A coiivictii>n for trading as a hawker and pedlar without a license was hei<l nol to lie supj)orteil liy evidi'iice <>f a single act of selling a |iarcel of silk handkertdiiefs to a itartieular pei-sou ; for tlu' hare act of sale, it was iield. did not show the det"endant to have bei'ii such a [lerson as by law is required to take out a license. (3) We have seen, by Article 84(5, ante, tliat a conviction is not to be deemed insuiticient for not containing the name of the person injured, nor for omitting to state who is the owner of any ])ro])erty therein mentioned, nor for omitting to specify the means by which the ott'ence has been committed, nor that it does not luime or describe any person or thing with ])recision. The time when the ott'ence was committed ought to be statetl. But the precise day need not be named ; and it will be sufficiently certain if the fact be alleged to have hajipened between such u day and such a daj'. j>rovided the last of the days s]KH'itied be within the limited time. Thus, where the information charged the ottence to have been committed on the 4th of October and on divers other days and times between that day and the I'jth of November, and the convic- tion stated the ott'ence to have been committed on the 8th of (1 ) Kite & bane's Case, 1 B. & C. 101. See also R. v. Nunn, 8 B. & C. 644. (2) R. v. Caton, Ki Ont. R. 11. (3) R. v. Little, 1 Burr. 610. 3Hfi PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. Xovi'iubor. it was held to be valid. (1) .\nd where, in a convic- tio.i under the Canada Temperance Act. there was a statement alloginu; that the ott'enee was committed between the thirtietli of ■lune and the thirty-tirst of July, it was h'ebl to be a sutlioiently certain statement of the time. (2) And a conviction for keeping a house of ill-fame on the eleventh of October and on other days and times before that ilay was also held sutticientlv' certain as to time ; the only offence (diarged by thiise words l)eini'' the keeping and maintaining of a house of ill-fame : ancl the fact that the parties accused kept such a house on the eleventh of October and on other days before that day <lid not constitute a distinct and separate otfence against them upon ea(di of those days. (;^) When the summons alleges the offence to have been ccunmitted on a certain day. and at the hearing it is proveil to have been, in fact, committed on some other day. the justices should amend the summons byjdtering the date. (^4) Under the second clause of Article ^^M. supra, any variance b.'tween the information and the evidence adducc'd. at the sum- mary trial thereof, as to the tinu' at wbieb such offence is alleged to luive been committed is not to iu' deemed matei'ial. if it is proved that the information was in fact ]ai<l wilhin the time limited by law t'or laying it. Before proceeding to a conviction, the Justiees should have evi- dence whicJi is reasonably sufiicient to show that the otfence (diarged has Ih'cii committi'd. Where, in a case uikU'i- the Canada Tiviperance Act, the defendant swore at the trial that lu' did not sell any intoxicaiing liquor on the day chargeil. an<l there was no otin^r evidence showing yiositively that the lifiuor sold was intoxi- cating liquor, the evidence for the Crown being merely that it RKSEMBi.Ki) intoxiealing liquor, it was held that, under the.se cir- cumstances, there was no evidi-nce on whiidi to t'ouml a eonviction for selling intoxicating liquor. (5) . (1) Onley v, Gee, :!() L. .1. M. C. 2'1'1. (2) R. V. Wallace, 4 Ont. R. 1'.'7. (:$) R. • . \Villiam8, 'Al U. C. Q. B. 540. (4) Mayor of Exeter v. Heamati, ;i7 L. T. 6o4. (")) R. V. Benne',c, 1 Ont. K. 44."). CONVICTION. SSI' So. where, on a eoiiviction under tlio 11 Geo. 1. (Imp.), e. oO. see. l(i, for Unowingly harbouring and keeping certain spirit)* liable to ex'ise duty, it ai)peared, from the evidence, that .search iuivin f been made in the defendant's house durintr the defenchmt's absente. but in tiie |»resence of his wife, the 8j>irits were found concealed in an inner room therein, that tlio (Ud'endant before the convicting justices produced no evidence, but insisted that the room in which the st'izure Avas ma<U' was (U'tached from his dwelf- inghousi' and had a door always left unlocked, it was held that the t'videnci' was too sligiit to found a conviction, and that the mere- naked fact of the spirits being found in the defendant's house- during bis absence — although abundant as a ground of suspicion — could not be considered as satisfactor}' evidence that the defend- ant ivNow[.\<ii,v barlMtiii-ed or permitted the s]>irits to remain in the liouse : and the conviction was (puishcd. (1) The defendant, upon being convicted, is entitled, ujion applica- tion, to a copy of the conviction ; (2) an<l a justice who refuses it may have to pay the costs of a certiorari to obtain it. (;}) Hut the justices are not bound by tlu' copy they deliver; and if it shoubl be found to be defective or infornuil, from misstating the name of the informer or any other fact, without there Ijeingany fraud or intention to nnslead. a more correct one may be returnt'd to the sessions ; and the court can only take notice of the latter. (4) It seems, indi'e(l. that the formal conviction may lu- drawn up at any time before the return (d' the certiorari, allbmigh suidi re- turn be after a commitment. (5) or after the jK-nalty has been Icvii'd by distress. ((1) or after action brought against the nuigis 1 rates. (7) A nnigistrate has even been allowi'd to retiii'u an amended con- viction to the sessions after having returned an erroneous one ; (S)i , (1) Jix parte Ransiey, ;'> D. i^i R. 572. (I!) K. v. Midlam, 3 Burr, 17l.'0. (3) K. v. Himiin^'don, r» D. i<i It. 688. (4) K. V. Allen, 15 Eaat, 333, :i4tl. (5) Massey v. .lohnson, 12 East, .S2; R. v. McCarthy, 11 0. R. 057. (6) R. v. Barker, 1 Kast, 18(i. (7) Lindsay v. I^igh, 11 (^ B. 455; Gray v. Cookson, 1() East, 13. (8) Sellwood V. Mount, !) C. it P. 75 ; 1 Q. B. 729. 33S PRACTICAI, (MtllE TO AIAiilSTKATES. Iiiit it was liold that lio could not do tliis at'liT tin- coiivictioii as first returned had been quashed either on appeal or by the Coui-t of (Jueens l?eneli, nor after tlie <liscliarni' of the dcfemlant l)y the Queen's l^eneh by reason of the eonvietion iveited in tlu' wai'rant of oommitment lieing bad. (1) MftO. l>iN|»ONnl of |»t'iiulti«>.s 4»ii «*oiivi«'(ioii ol' joint ollV'lldt'rw. — When several persons join in the conimis- sion of the same otfonee, and upon eonvietion thereof eaeh is ad- judged to pay a penalty Avhieh ineludes the value of tlie property, or the amount of the injury (b)ne. no further sum siiali i)e paid to the [)ersou aggrieved than sueh amitunt or value, and costs, if an}*, itnd the residue of tlie ])enalties imjiosed shall be applied in the same nuiuner as other penalties imposed by a Justice are directed to be api)lied. HUl. FirNt convictiuii in <'('rlHiii 4'a.*«<'N. — AVlien- ever any person is sumnuirily convicted before a .lustice of any of- feuee against Pai-ts XX. to XXX. inclusive, or I'art XX.Wll. of the Code, and it is a first conviction, the Juslice may. if he thinks tit. discharge the offender from his conviction upon his making such satisfaction to the pei-son aggrieved, for <laniages and costs. or either of them, as are aseertaint'd by the .Justice. Parts XX. to XXII I. relate to Assailts. K'ai'jk. laiiEL. etc.; ]iarfs XXIV. to XXX. relate to TiiEFT, Burolahy. etc.. and part XXXVII. relates to Mischief. A person summarily convicted of any offence for which no pun- ishment is specially provided shall be liable t<» a penalty not ex- ceeding 850. or to im])risonment Avith or without hard labor for a term not exceeding 6 mcjuths, or to both. (("ode. Art. !»5]. sub-soc. Whenever the offence of which the defendant is convicted is. in the ojiinion of the justice, directly against the peace, and if the justice is of opinion that the oti'enee was committed under eircum- sfances rendering if probable th'it the person convicted will be ugain guilty of the same or some other ofl'encc unless bound over (1) Chaney v. Payne, 1 Ad. iSt Ell (N. S.) 712 ; 10 L. J. M. C. 114. CERTIFICATE OF DISMISSAL. i{H!t to good iH'liuviour. sueli justice ma}', in julditioii to or in lieu of any other sentence, require the accused to give security to keep tin- peace and be of good behaviour for any teiMu not exceeding twelve months. (Code. Art. !»5!».) As to Costs, see p. H42. post ; and as to Compensation to the BONA VIDE I'URCUASEK OF STOLEN PROPERTY, SCC p. 271, UUte. H^a. VvrtiHvtkiv ot'iliMiiiiNMal. — If the Justice dismisses the information or complaint, he may. when requii-ed so to do, make an onler of dismissal in the form RBH in schedule one and he sliail give the defendant a certiticate in the form CCC in the said schedule. (1) which certiticate, upon being after- wards ])roduced. shall, without further ])roof, be a bar to any subsequent information or complaint for the same matter, against the same defendant. At common law and independently of statutory enactment, a former conviction or acquittal, whether on a criminal summaiy pro- ceeding or i>n an indictment, will be an answer to an information of a criminal nature before justices founded on the same facts. The true test to show that such previous conviction or acquittal is a bar is whether the evidence necessary to support the second proceeding would have been sutficient to procure a legal conviction on the tirst. (2) See comments and authorities at p]). 2!t5. ante, and H4(l-;}42, post. HHii. »iM»lM>di<'n«*<> to CIrdvr wf JiiNti<*t>.— When ever, by any Act or law, authority is given to commit a person to prison, oi- to lev\- any sum upon his goods or chattels by distress, for not obeying an order of a .lusticc thedefendant shall be served witli a copA of tiie minute of the order before any warrant of com mitment or of distress is issued in that behalf; and the order or minute shall not form any part of the warrant of commitment or of distress. (1) For Forms BBB and CCC, eeo p. 382, 3S3, post. (2) Per Coleridge, J., in R. v. Drury, 18 L. J. M. C, 189. 340 I'aAoncAL oirinK to mahistrate.s. S64I. AssanltM^ — Whenever any person unlawfully assaults or beats any other person, any .lustice may summarily hear and determine the charge, unless at the time of entering ui>on the in- vestigation the person aggrieved or the person aceused ohjeets thereto. 2. If such Justice is of opinion that the assault or battery com- plained of is, from any other circumstance, a tit subject for prose- cution by indictment, he shall abstain from any adjudication there- upon, and shall deal with the case in all respects in the same manner as if he liad no authority tinally to hear and determine the same. H^a. niMiiiiNNal ol'foiiiplaiiil lor ANMiiilt.— If the justice, upon the heabino of any case of assault or battery upon the merits where the coinitlaint is ])referred by or on belnilt of the pers(m aggrieved, under the next preceding section, deems the otfence not to be proved, or finds the assault or battery to have been justified, or so trifling as not to merit i^ny i)uiiishmenr, and accordingly dismisses the complaint, hv shnW fort hw it, h make out a certificate under his hand stating the fact of such disniihsal, and shall deliver such certiticate to the person against whom the com- ]»laint was |ireferred. soft. Kt'leuMC from I' irtli«>r l*ro«*<'('<liii)(N. — If the jter.son against whom any such comjilaint has been preferred, by or on behalf of the person aggrieved, obtains such certificate, or. having lieen convicted. ])ays the wl\ole anKumt adjudged to be ])aid or suffers the imprisonment or iiuitrisoument with hard labour, awarded, he shall be released I'roni idl lurther or other ])roceedings, civil or criminal. /or the same cause. In R. V. Miles, already citi'd at ]). 2'J5, ante, a case was stated for the consideration of the Court for Crown Cases Ifeserved. The defendant had been convicted at the Central Criniiiuii Court upon an indictment charging him (in the first count) with .ndawfiilly and maliciously wounding the ))rosecntor ; (in the second count) with utilawfully and maliciously inflict ng grievous bodily harm ; (1,1 the third count) with causing tictual liodil}' harm to the jjros- ecutor : and (in the fourth count) with common assault. The defendant pleaded and jjoinfed out at the trial the following con- RELEASE FKOM Fl'RTllER I'ROCBEIUNUS. 341 victioii ill fosjieot of thi8 sanu' assimlt before a Court of Summary Jurisdiction : ' (i. J. .Miles, iiereinafter called tiic defendant, is this day convicted for that he did unlawfully assault an<l beat one t'hubs Living, and the court being of o|)iiiion that the said offence was of so trifling a nature that it is inexpedient to inflict any other than a nominal inuiishment. and the defendant, having given security to the satisfa -tion of the court to be of goo<l behaviour, is discharged.' The (iiu'stion for the .opinion of the court was whether the above summary conviction was a bar to the |>roceed- ings against him at the Central Criminal Court for the .same offence, Poland. H. C, and Warburton. for the defemlant, said ; • Kxpress j)ower is given by the Summary Jurisdiction Act. 187!t (42 k 43 Vict. c. 4!>), s. 1(>, i^ubsec 2. to Justices, upon convicting a person of assault, to discharge him c(mditionally on his giving security to be of good behaviour : and the ]>rovisions in 24 it 25 Vict. c. 100, s. 45, must now be read with the section above referred to. Moreover, apart from statutes, the sunnnary conviction formed a bar at common law to the ])rescnt indictment. " hockwood. (IX).. and Mesley. for the prosecution, said : ■The 24 k 25 N'ict. c. 100, s. 45. only operates as a bar where a defendant shall have paid the whole amount adjudged or shall havesuffered tlu' im]»risonment awarded ; but the Court neither fined nor inii)ris(UUMl ihe d<'fcndant. The proceedings under the Siimniary .lui'isdiction Act b^SO. did not bring the case within section 45 of the earlier statute." Cur. adv. vult. The court (Lord Coleridge, C. .1. Pollock. H.. Hawkins, J.. Charles, .1., and (Jrantham. .1.), upon Ihe aliove tacts, held that the summary conviction was a good answer at common law tt» the indictment. a])art altogether from the (question whether the lelend- ant was entitled to the protection affor<led by 24 & 25 Vict. c. 100, sec. 45 ; and t^uashed the conviction. (1) The objection of rgsjuf/'cafa must when raised against a second ])rosecution for an offence already disposed of. be taken before the magistrates at the hearing and not reserved as a ground fortjuasii- ing the conviction or onler after it has been made. (2) The previous proceeding when used as an answer to a new one (1) R. v. Miles, 13 L. N. 79; 24 Q. B. D. 423 ; 50 L. .1. M. C. 50. See other eases oit. at p. 295, ante. (2) R. V. Herri ngton, 12 W. R. 420. 342 PRACTICAL OUn>E T(» MAGISTRATES. hIiouUI hiivi' Ik'oii cari'iod to a dooision u])()ii tlio merits. (1) And it seems tlia) tiio ccrtiHcate of" dismissal can only W granted when tliere lias lieen a iiearing upon the merits. (2) The graiiting of the certificate mentioned in the aliove Article 8(!() is a ministerial act. and the application f^or it need not he made ill the |)re.sence of the other party ; and. as it seems, it may he made at any time, the word kortmwitu in Article SG5 meaning forthwith on application for it. and not forthwith on dismissal of the information. (8) HttT. CoNtN on <'oiivi<*tioii or 4lr«lor. — In every case of a summary conviction, or of an order made hy a justice, such Justice, may. in his discretion, award and order, in and hv the con- viction or order, that the defendant shall j»ay to the prosecutor or complainant such costs an to the said justice seem reasonahle in that hehalf and not inconsistent with fees estahlished hy law to he ttiken on proceedings had hy and hefore justices. .HON. <'ONtM on DiNniiNNltl. — Whenever the justice, in- i ead of convicting or nuiking an order, dismisses the infori'iation or com])laint. he may in his discretion, in and hy his order of dis- nusfial, award and order that the prosecutor or comjdainant shall ]»ay to the defendant such costs as to the said justice seem reason- ahle and consistent with law. M60. Hec'over^i' ol' ConIh on C'on%'iftioii or Din- uiiNNal. — The sums so allowed for costs shall, in all cases, he specified in the conviction or order, or order of dismissal, and the same shall he recoverahle in the same numner and under the same warrants as any penalty, adjudged to he paid by tlie conviction or order, is to he recovered. The recovery of penalties is |)rovided for hy Article 8t2, infra. A conviction which imposes an amount of costs in excess of those authorized hy the statute under which the conviction takes place (1) R. V. Hernngton, 3 N. R. 468 ; 12 W. R. 420. (2) Keed v. Nutt, 24 J. B. D. 06!). (3) Hancock v. Somes, 1 E. & E. 795 ; 28 L, J. M. C. 196 ; Costar v. lleth- eiington, 1 E. & E. 802; 28 L. J. M.C. 198. FEES. 343 will bo invalid. (1) Hut where the statute authnrizing the justice to award costs does not fix any tariff, the justice may award ^u(•ll costs as ho thinks roas()nai)]c. (2) Whoro justices signed a conviction and warrant of comniitnient leaving blanks for the amount of costs to ho inserted, it was held to be an irregularity, but not an excess of jurisdicticm rendering them liable to an action. (Ji) STO. Kvv»\evj of i.'ostH wUvn tlit're In iio Pt'ii- ulty. — AVlienever there is no such ]ienalty to bo recovered, siuh costs sludl be recoverable by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the ]iarty. and in default of distress, by imjirisonmont, wit.) i'v without hard labour, for any term not exceeding one MONTH. 871. ■'"'CH'S. — The fees mentioned in the following taritf and on others shall be andconstiluto the fees to i>e taken on procood- ings be foi'o justices in proceedings under this part : — Fees to be taken by Justices of the Peace or their Clerks S cts. 1. Fuformation or complaint and warrant or summons...... 50 2. Warrant whore summons issued in tirst instance (I ID ;{. Kach necessary copy of summons oi- warrant 10 4. I'lach summons or warrant to oi' for a witness or witnesses. (Only one summons on each side to bo charged for in each case, which may contain any number of names. If the justice of the case requires it, additional sum- monses shall be issued without charge) 10 5. Information for warrant for witness and warrant 50 (5. Each necessary eo])y of summons or warrant for witness. TO 7. For every recognizance 25 8. Forbearing and determining case 50 0. If case lasts over two hours 1 00 (1) Re Bibby, 6 M. L. R., 472. (2) R. V. Starkey, 7 M. L. R. 489. (3) Bolt V. Ackroyd, 28 L. J. M. C. 207. ;!14 PBACTICAI. GUrDE To MAdlSTUATES, 10. Wlu'iT oiu' jiisticf iiliHU' ciuiiiot lawfully lu'ar iiiid dolor- mine tlio case, tlio Haino loo tor hoariiig and dotoniiiii- ing to 1)0 allowod to the assooiato justioo. 11. For each wai-rant of distress or oommitniont 25 12. For making u]i rocord of oonviotion or order wlioro tlio samo is ovdorod to Ito ri'turiiod to sessions or on cerliorari 1 (in Hut in all eases wliieli admit of a summary proeoed- ing liufore a single Justice and wherein no higlior l)enalty liiau ^2(» can bo imjioscd. there shall i»o ehargod for the reeord of oonviotion not more than 5n \'\. For eo|)y of any otliei' paper eonneeted with rnyeaso, and tlu' minutes of the same if demanded. |)er lolio of 1(1(1 words (I 05 14. For I'very l>ill of costs when demanded to he made out in detail 10 (Items i;{ and 14 to he oliargoahlo only when there has hoon an adjiulieation.) Constables Fees. 1. Arrest of eacdi individual upmi a warrant. (1) 1 50 2. Serving summons , 25 ;>. MiU'age to .servo summons or warrant, per mile (one way) nooossarih' travelled 10 4. Same mileage when service cannot ho t'tfeoted. hut only upon proof of duo diligence. 5. Mileage taking prisoner to gaol, oxolusivo of dishurso- ments noeossarily expended in his oonveyanco 10 C. Attending justices on trial, for each day neeossarily em]>lovod in one or more cases, when engaged less than four hours. (1) 1 GO *7 Attending Justices on trial, for each day necessarily em- ployed in one or more cft'^es, when engaged more than four liours. (1) 1 50 (1) As amended hj 57-58 Vic., c. 57, sec. 1. FEES. 345 8. Mileage ti-iivelU'il lo atloiid trial (when |mltlie convey- juiee ean lie taken only reasonalile (lishursenients to be alloweii) one way. |)er mile (• !<• ft. Serving warrant of distress anil returning same 1 00 10. Advertising undi'r warrant ol' distress 1 (lO 11. Travelling to make dislres.s, or, to seareh tor goods to make distress when no goods are found (one way), per mile <• 10 12. Apiiraisenients. whetlu'r by one a|)))raiser or more, 2 eents in the dollar on the value of the goods l;{. Commission on sale and delivery of good,><, 5 eents in tlie dollar on the net produee of tbe good.'^. Witnesses Fees. 1. Eaeh day attentling trial 75 2. Mileage travelled to attend trial (one way) per mile 10 N73. ProviNioiiK KcNpectiii}*; Coii% ictioiiM. — AVhenever a eonvietion adjndge.s a j>eeuniarv ,.Mialty or com- pensation to be jiaid. or an ord-r requires Ihf payment of a sum of money, whether the aet or law authorizing sucji conviction or order does or does not provide a mode of raising or levying the penalty, ecmipensation or sum of money, or of enforcing the pay- ment thereof, the justice by his conviction, or order after adjudg- ing |»ayment of such penalty, compensation or sum of money, with or without costs, may order and adjudge — (a) that in default of payment thereof forthwith, or within a limited time, such penalty, compensation or sum of money shall l)e levied by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the defend- jint. and, if sufficient distress cannot lie found, that the defendant be imprisoned in the manner and for the time directed by the act or law authorizing such conviction or oider or by the Code, or foi- any period not exceeding three months, if the act or law author- izing the conviction or order does not specify imprisonment, or does not specify any tei'm of imprisonment, unless such penalty, compensation or sum of money and costs, if the conviction or 'Mii PRACTICAI, (it IliE T(» MA0ISTHATE8. oi'dcr IS nia(U' with costs, ami llu' i'X|k'iisi's dI' liic distress and of coiivt'yiii.ii; (lio dcfoiidaiit lo ijaol ai'c sooner paid ; (l)()f (b.) tliat in (k't'anll oJ' piiA'mi'Ut ol" lliv saiil |ienalty. compen- sation or sum ol" money, and costs, if any, t'oiMliwitli. or williin a limited lime, tlie defendant lie imprisoned in the manner and for the time mi-ntioned in the saiil act or law. or for any period not exceedini;' three months, if the act or law autln»rizinii' the convic- tion or order (hu-s not spi'cily imprisonment, or does not sjiccity any term of imprisonment, unless the said sums with the like ci>sts and e.\]»cnses are sooner ])aid. (1) 2. 'Phi' Justice making the con\iction or onler mentioned in the paragrajth lettered (a) of suhaoction one id' this section ma^' issue a warrant of distress in the form DDl) or bllvK, as ilu' case re- quires ; (2) and in the case of a conviction or order under the |)ara- graph lettered (b) of the said suhsectiou, a warrant in one of the forms KKJ-' oi' (UKr (8) may issue ; (a.) If a warrant of distress is issued and tli(> constable or pi'ace otticev duiryed with tlie execution thereof rclui'ns (form III) that he can find no gooils or chattels whereon to levy thereunder (4) the justice may issue a warrant of commitment in the fonu .I.TJ.'(5) . I{. Where, by virtue of an act or law so authorizing, the Justice by his conviction adjudges against tin- defendant payment of a ]ienalty or compensation, and also imprisonment, as punishment, for an otl'encc. he may. if he thinks tit, order that the imjirison- nieut in default of distress or of payment, as ]irovidcd for in this section, shall commence at tlie expiration of the imprisonment awarded as a punishment for the otl'ence. 4. The like proceeding may be had upon any conviction or order made as provided by this section as if the act or law authorizing the same had exjircssl}" provided for a conviction or order in the above terms. (1) As amended hy 57-58 Vict., c. 57, sec. !• (2) For forms DDD and EEE, see pp. 383 and 384, poM. (3) For forms FFF and GGG, see pp. 385-387, pod. (4) For form III see p. 388, pott. (6) For form JJ.T, see p. 389, post. LEVVINd FINKS, f()8T8, ETC. 347 When iinpriHoniiient is clirocted as a mode of punishmont Cor an oHbiKc, tlie ilofondunt mufst stay in prison for the period ordered. But when imprisonment is directed as a mode of onforciiiir pay- ment of a penalty or fine, the defonchvnt may ])ay, and thns avoid tb.e imprisonment ; or, if he does not pay at onee, and is sent to gaol, he can ctbtain his release before the end of the time by paying. When the judgment orders the monej* to be levied by disfress, an<l that, in default of there being sufficient goods, the defendant shall be imprisoned, the distress warrant should be issued tirst, and it should be ascertained that there are no sufficient distress iipon which to levy, and a retiirn to that etiect should be made before the warrant of commitment is issued. And it seems that the tle- fendant's goods cannot be sold for part of the penalty and costs, and the defendant sent to gaol for the balance. So that, if the de- fendant has ])aid part of the jienalty, it must be returned to him before he can be sent to gaol for non-pajnnent. (1) H7li. Order hn to Collection ot* C^osts on a «liN- nilNNlll. — When any information or comi)laint is dismissed with costs, the justice may issue a warrant of distrei-s on the goods and chattels of the ])rosecutor or complainant, in the form KKK, for the amount of such costs ; (2), and. in default of distress, a war- rant of commitment in the form LLL may issue. (3) Provided that the term of imprisonmeni in such case shall not exceed one MONTH. MT4. KndorNenient of* Warrant of* UiNtreNN.— If, after delivery of any warrant of distress i.ssued under this part to the constable or constables to whom the same has been directed to be executed, sufficient distress cannot be found within the limits of the jurisdiction of the justice granting the warrant, then upon proof lieing made upon oath or affirmation of the liandwriting of the justice granting the warrant, before any justice of any other territoi'ial division, such justice shall thereupon make an enrJjise- ment on the warrant, signed with his hand, authorizing the exocu- (1) Brown v. Linden, 17 Ont., App. Rep. 173. (2) For form KKK, eee p. 390, poH. (3) For form LLL, see p. 391, post. 23 348 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. tion of the warrant within the hmits of liis jurisdiction, by virtue of which >varrant and endorsement the penalty or sum and costs, or so much thereof as has not been before levietl or paid, shall bo levied by the person bringing the warrant, or by the person or persons to whom the warrant was originally directed, or b}' any constable or other peace officer of the last mentioned territorial division, by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the defendant therein. 2. Such endorsement shall be in the form HUH in schedule one of the Code. (1) N7>1. nistreNH not to lMi«tiir in Certain C'uncn.— Whenever it ap])ears to any justice that the issuing of a distress warrant would be ruinous to the defendant and his family, or whenever it appears to the justice, by the confession of tlie defend- ant or otherwise, that he has no goods and chattels whereon to levy such distiess, then the justice, if he deems it tit, instead of issuing a warrant of distress, maj' commit the defendant to the common gaol or other prison in the territorial division, there to be imprisoned, with or without hard labour, for the time and in the manner he would have been committed in case such warrant of distress had issued and no sutflcient distress had been found. M70 Kcniand of Ui'f'ondant Wiion UiNtroNii is Ordered. — Whenever a justice issues a warrant of distress as hereinbefore provided, he may sutler the defendant to go at large, or verbally, or by a written warrant in that behalf, may order the defendant to be kept and detained in safe custod}', until return lias been made to the warrant of distress, unless the defendant gives sutflcient security, by recognizance or otherwise, to the satisfaction of the justice, for his appearance, at the time and place appointed for the return of the warrant of distress, before him or before such other justice for the same territorial division as shall then be there. ^•77, Cnmulative Pnniiilinient. — Whenever a justice, upon any information or complaint, adjudges the defendant to be imprisoned and the defendant is then in prison undergoing im- (i) For form HHH, see p. 388, post. RECOGNIZANCES. 349 prisonraent for any other oftence, the warrant of commitment for the snbsequent offence shall be forthwith delivered to the gaoler or other officer to whom it is directed ; and the justice who issued the same, if he thinks tit, maj- award and order therein that the imprisonment for the subsequent otfence shall commencofat the expiration of the imprisonment to which the defendant was previously sentenced. When the defendant is not already in prison upon some other conviction, the imj^risonment upon a warrant of commitment is to be calculated from the earliest moment of the day of the arrest under the warrant of commitment. (1) MTS. KectlgiilKances. — Whenever a defendant gives se- curity by or is discharged upon recognizance and does not after- wards appear at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance, the justice who took the recognizance, or any justice who is then present, having certified upon the back of the recognizance the non-apj)earance of the defendant, ma}^ tian.'^mit such recognizance to the pro])er officer in the jirovince a))])ointed bj' law to receive the same, to be proceeded u])on in like manner as other recogniz- ances ; and such certificate shall be prima facie evidence of the non-appearance ot the said defendant. 2. Such certificate shall be in the form MMM in schedule one of the Code. (2) The proper officer to whom the recognizance and certificate of default are to be transmitted, in the province of Ontario, shall be the clei-k of the peace of the county for which such justice is acting, except in the district of Nipissing, as to which district the proper officer shall be the clerk of the peace for the county of Renfrew ; and the Court of General Sessions of the Peace for such county shall, at its then next sitting, order all such recognizances to be forfeited and estreated, and the same shall bo enforced and collected in the same manner and subject to the same conditions as any fines, forfeitures or amercements im])osed by or forfeited before such court ; and in the other provinces of Canada the proper officer to vf hom any such recognizance and certificate (1) Bowdler's case, 12 Q. B. 612; Ex parte Foulkes, 15 M. & W. 612, Braham v. Joyce, 4 Exch. 487. (2) For form MMM, see p. 392, pott. 350 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. shall be transmitted shall be the officer to whom like recognizances have been heretofore accustomed to be transmitted under the law in force before the passing of the Code ; and such recognizance shall be enforced and collected in the samq manner as like recog- nizances have heretofore been enforced and collected. . HTO. Appeal.— Unless it is otherwise provided in any special Act under which a conviction takes place or an order is made by a justice for the payment of money or dismissing an information or complaint, any person who thinks himself aggrieved by any such conviction or order, — the prosecutor or complainant, as well as the defendant, — may appeal, — in the province of Ontario, to the Court of general sessions of the peace ; in the province of QUEBEC, to the Court of queen's bench, crown side ; in the provinces of nova scotia, new Brunswick and Manitoba, to the COUNTY court of the district or county Avhere the cause of the information or complaint arose ; in the province of pbince edward ISLAND, to the SUPREME COURT ; in the province of British col- U.MBIA, to the COUNT! or district court, at the sitting thereof which shall be held nearest to the place where the cause of the information or complaint arose ; and, in the north-west territor- ies, to a JUDGE of the supreme court of the said territories, sitting without a jury, — at the place where the cause of the infor- mation or complaint arose, or the nearest place thereto where a court is appointed to be held. 2. In the district of nipissino, such person may appeal to the Court of GENERAL SESSIONS of the peace for the county of Renfrew. See Article 900 of the Code, post, as to 'ating a case for review. .sNO« Certificate of* Appeal. — Every right of appeal shall, unless it is otherwise provided in any special Act, be subject to the conditions following, that is to say : — (a.) If the conviction or order is made more than fourteen days before the sittings of the court to which the appeal is given, such appeal shall bo made to the then next sittings of such court ; but if the conviction or order is made within fourteen days of the sittings of sut'h court, then to the second sittings next after such conviction or order ; APPEAL. 351 (6.) The appellant shall give to the respondent, or to the justice who tried the case, for him, a notice is writing, in the formNNJiT IN SCHEDULE ONE of the Code, (1) of such appeal, within ten days after such conviction or order ; (c.) The appellant, if the appeal is from a conviction adjudging imprisonment, shall either remain in custody until the holding of the court to which the appeal is given, or shall enter into a recog- nizance in the form OOO in the said schedule (2) with two suffi- cient sureties, before a justice, conditioned personally to appear at the said court; and to try such appeal, and to abide the judgment of the court thereupon, and to pay such costs as are awarded by the court ; or, if the appeal is against any conviction or order, whereby only a penalty or sum of money is adjudged to be paid, the appellant (although the order directs imprisonment in default of payment), instead of remaining in custody as aforesaid, or giv- ing such recognizance as aforesaid, may deposit with the justice convicting or making the order such sum of money as such justice deems sufficient to cover the sum so adjudged to be paid, together with the costs of the conviction or order, and the costs of the appeal ; and upon such recognizance being given, or such deposit being made, the justices before whom such recognizance is entered into, or deposit made, shall liberate such person, if in custody. (d.) In the case of an appeal from the order of a justice, pur- suant to section 571, for the restoration of gold or gold-bcai"ing quartz, or silver, or silver ore, the ai^pellant shall give security by recognizance to the value of the said property to prosecute his appeal at the next sittings of the court and to pay such costs as are awarded against him ; (e.) The court to which such appeal is nuide shall thereupon hear and determine the matter of appeal and make such order therein, with or without costs to either party, including costs of the court below, as seems meet to the court, — and. in case of the dismissal of an appeal by the defendant and the affirmance of the conviction or order, shall order and adjudge the ajipellant to be punished according to the conviction or to j)ay the amount adjudged (1) For Form NNN, see p. 392, pott. (2) For Form 000, see p. 393, post. 362 . PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES, hy the said order, and to pay such costs as are awarded, — and shall, if necessary, issue process for enforcing the judgment of the court ; and whenever, after any such deposit has been made as aforesaid, the conviction or order is affirmed, the court may order the sum thereby adjudged to be paid, together with the costs of the convic- tion or order, and the costs of the appeal, to be paid out of the money deposited, and the residue, if any, to be repaid, to the appellant ; and whenever, after any such deposit, the conviction or order is quashed, the court shall order the money to be repaid to the appellant ; (/.) The said court shall have power, if necessary, from time to time, by order endorsed on the conviction or order, to adjourn the hearing of the appeal from one sitting to another, or others, of the said court ; (g.) Whenever any conviction or order is quashed on appeal, as aforesaid, the clerk of the peace or other proper officer shall forth- with endorse, on the conviction or order, a memorandum that the same has been quashed : and whenever any copy or certificate of such conviction or oi'der is made, a copy of such memorandum shall be added thereto, and shall, when certified under the hand of the clerk of the peace, or of the proper officer having the custody of the same, be sufficient evidence, in all courts and for all purposes, that the conviction or order has been quashed. In computing the ten days within which the notice of appeal is to be given, the daj' of the conviction is to be excluded. (1) The TEN days within Avhich the notice of appeal is to be given under the above Article must be calculated from the day of the adjudication and not from the time when the formal conviction or order is made up and signed. (2) The notice should state that the appellant is aggrieved by the conviction or order appealed from. (3) The object of the notice is to inform the respondents of the par- (1) Se« Pellew v. Wonford, 9 B. & ('. 134, and other authorities at pp. 71, 72, ante. (2) Ex parte Johnson 32 L. J. M. C. 193. (3) R. V. J. J. West Riding of Yorks., 7 B. & 0. 792 ; R. v. J. J., Essex, 5 B. & C, 431. PROCEEDINGS ON APPEAL. 353 ticular conviction appealed against ; and the Justice before whom the conviction took place, and the nature of the conviction itself should be mentioned in the notice. But the notio« will not be cri- tically construed, and, if it substantially give to the respondents the requisite information, it will (apart from statutory provision on the subject), be held sufficient. (1) 881. JProceedMngs ot appeal. — When an appeal against any summary conviction or decision has been lodged in due form, and in compliance with the requirements of this part, the Court appealed to shall try, and shall be the absolute judge, as well of the facts as of the law, in respect to such conviction or decision ; and any of the parties to the appeal may call witnesses and adduce evidence, whether such witnesses were called or evid- ence adduced at the hearing before the Justice or not, either as to the credibility of any witness, or as to any other fact material to the inquiry ; but any evidence taken before the justice at the hear- ing below, signed by the witness giving the same and certified by the Justice, may be read on such appeal, and shall have the like force and effect as if the witness was there examined : Provided, that the Court appealed to is satisfied by affidavit or otherwise, thai the personal presence of the witness cannot be obtained by any reasonable eft'orts. If when the appeal comes up for hearing, the appellant be surprised by the production of a conviction dilferent from the copy previously delivered to him, he may apply for time, and the appeal should be adjourned. (2) The fii'st step after the appeal is called on is for the appellant to prove his notice, unless it is admitted. Where an appeal is called on and then adjourned to the next sittings of the Court appealed to, the re8i)ondent's counsel, although the adjournment takes place on his application, may nevertheless require proof of due notice of appeal. (3) After the notice of appeal has been proved or admitted, the clerk of the Court reads the conviction i*eturned by the convicting jus- (1) R. y. J. J. Denbighsh, 9 Dowl. P. C, 509. (2) R. V. Allen, 15 East. 346. (3) R. V. J. J., Middlesex, 2 Dowl. N. 8., 719. 364 PRACriCAL aUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. tice ; and if there are any objections raised as appearing on the face of the conviction, the appellant usuuUy begins by stating all his objections thereto at once, in order that they may be met by the other side. But if thore are rjo such objections taken, or if when taken they are overruled, the respondent opens his case on the merits, and calls witnesses ; and, if the Court thinks the case thus opened and proved requires an answer, the appellant then opens his case and calls his witnesses. And when the appellant's case is closed, the respondent has a general reply upon the whole case. I. SM2. Appeal on matters of t'oriii. — No judgment shall be given in favour of the appellant if the appeal is based on an objection to any information, complaint or summons, or to any warrant to apprehend a defendant issued upon any such informa- tion, complaint or summons, for any alleged defect therein, in sub- stance or in form, or I'or any variance between such information, complaint, summons or warrant, and the evidence adduced in sup- port thereof at the hearing of such infortnation or complaint, un- less it is proved before. the Court hearing the appeal that such objection was made before the Justice before whom the case was tried and by whom such conviction, judgment or decision was given, or unless it is proved that notwithstanding it was shown to such Justice that by such variance the person summoned and ap- pearing or apprehended had been deceived or misled, such Justice refused to adjourn the hearing of the case to some further day, as herein provided. SS3. Judi^nient to bo upon the merits. — In every case of appeal from any summar}' conviction or order had or made before any Justice, the Court to which sutdi appeal is made shall, notwithstanding any defect in such conviction or order, and not- withstanding that the punishment imposed or the order made may be in excess of that which might lawfully have been imposed or made, hear and determine the charge or complaint on which such conviction or order has been had or made, upon the merits, and may confirm, reverse or modify the decision of such Justice, or may make such other conviction or order in the matter as the Court thinks just, and may by such order exercise any power which the Justice whose decision is appealed from might have ex- PBOGEEDINQS ON APPEAL. 355 ercised, and such conviction or order shall have the same effect and may be enforced in the same manner as if it had been made by such Justice. The Court may also make such order as to costs to be paid by either party as it thinks fit. 2. Any conviction or order made by the Court on anpeal may also be enforced by jjf ocess of the Court itself. Sf^4. Costs wlicii appeal not prosecuted. — The Court to which an appeal is made, upon proof of notice of the appeal to such Court having been given to the person entitled to receive the same, — whether such notece has been properly GIVEN or not, — though such appeal was not afterwards prose- cuted or entered, may, if such appeal has not been abandoned ac- cording to law, at the same sittings for which such notice was given, order to the party or parties receiving the same, such costs and charges as are thought reasonable and just by the Court, to be paid by the party or parties giving such notice ; and such costs shall be recoverable in the manner provided by the Code for the recovery of costs upon an ajjpoal against an order and conviction. (1) HHS, Proeeediii|i;s when Appeal Fails. — Tf an appeal against a convioticm or order is decided in favour of the respondents, the justice who made the conviction or order, or any other justice for the same territorial division, may issue the war- rant of distress or commitment for execution of the same, as if no appeal had been brought. HfiG. Convietion not to be 4|uaslied for ]>ef'eets of Form. — No conviction oi* order affirmed, or atfirmed and amended, in appeal, shall be quashed for want of form, or be removed by certiorari into any Superior Court, and no warrant or commitment shall be held void by reason of any defect therein, provided it is thei-ein alleged that the defendant has been con- victed, and there is a good and valid conviction to sustain the same. (1) .'Is amended by 57-58 Vict, c. 57, sec. 1. 356 PHACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. 8S7. Certiorari n«t to lie when Appeal Is Taken. — No writ of certiorari shall be allowed to remove any conviction or order had or made before any justice of the peace, if THE DBVENDANT HAS APPEALED from such convictloii Or order to any conrt to which an appeal from such conviction or order is authorized by law, or shall be allowed to remove any conviction or order made upon such appeal. The writ of certiorari is a writ issuing out of a Superior Court for the purpose of procuring the inspection of the proceedings of any court of inferior jurisdiction. It requires no special law to authorize the certiorari, for it is a matter of course that all courts of inferior jurisdiction shall have their proceedings removable for the purpose of being examined by a Superior Court. In this respect the certiorari ditt'ere from the right of appeal ; for an appeal does not exist, unless expressly given by statute, while a certiorari lies unless expressly taken away by statute. (1) The practice of taking away the certiorari, by statute, which Lord Kenyon thought was too frequent, only began to prevail at the beginning of the reign of William III, not long after the introduction of appeals to the sessions, which, as already observed (2), came into use at the latter end of the reign of Charles II. The power of granting a certiorari is considered as so beneficial to the subject that it is not allowed to be interfered with by any- thing short of an express statutory prohibition ; and it is not taken away, unless there be express words to take it away. (3) And, even where a statute in express terms declares that the pro- ceedings shall not be removed by certiorari, this does not prevent its issuing at the instance of the prosecutor ; for (4) to restrain the pre- rogative of the Crown, in this particular, there must either be ex- (1) R. V, Hanson, 4 B. & Aid. 521 ; per Abbott, C. J., R. v. Cashiobury, 3 D. & R. 35. (2) See Introduction, p. V., ante. For Forms of Certiorari and of Recogn- izance thereon, see " Additional Forms " at the end of this Chapter. (3) R. V. Morley and others, 2 Burr. 1041. (4) R. v. Allan 15 East, 334, 341, 342. CERTIORARI. 35*7 press words for that purpose, or an intention, manifestly appear- ing upon the Act, that the Crown, as well as the subject, shall be i«'ohibited from lomoving the proceedings. (1) It is in fact beneficial to the subject that th's privilege should exist on the part of the Crown, for, in several instances where the certiorari is taken away from the defendant, the Attorney-General has assisted defendants, — where a doubtful judgment has been given below, — to have their cases reconsidered by applying on behalf of the Crown for the certiorari. Where there is a want or excess of jurisdiction, (2) — (which may be show.i by affidavit), (3), or where the court has been illegall}' coiii5tituted, (4) or the conviction has been obtained by fraud, (5) — express words taking away the certiorcri will not be applicable. And, notwithstanding that there were express words taking away the certiorari, the writ was allowed to issue in a case where the magistrate convicted of an assault upon a complaint asking only for sureties to be found to keep the peace. (6) The following objections have been held not to go to the juris- diction, namely ; that the defendant was convicted on a summons giving an unreasonably short notice, and in the absence of himself or anj'oiie on his behalf except an attorney authorized to apply only for an adjournment, and that the conviction took place with- out proof of service of the summons, the justices having jurisdiction over the subject matter. (7) So, where costs were ordered to be paid to the clerk of the com- missionei-s instead of the clerk of the peace, it was held to be a defect in form only. (8) If a summons is taken out under one statute, and the defendant (1) 15 East, 337; Paley Conv., 6 Ed. 429. (2) R. v. Sheffield Ry. Co., 11 A. & E. 194 ; R. v. Boultbee, 4 A. &. E. 498. (3) R. v. Bolton, 1 Q. B., 96. (4) R. v. Cheltenham Commre. 1 Q. B. 447. (6) R. v. Gillyard, 12 Q. B. 627. (6) R. v. Deny, and others, 20 L. J. M. C. 189. (7) Ex parte Hopwood, 15 Q. B. 121. (8) R. V. Binney, 22 L. J. M. C. 127. 868 PRACTICAL OniDE TO MAGISTRATES. is convicted under another, it is an excess of jurisdiction ; and a certiorari will bo granted. (I) Where the ai^plication for a writ of certiorari rests on the ground of defective jurisdiction, matters on whicli the defect depends may be apparent on the face of tiio procoedingn, or may be brought before the Superior Court by atfldavit. (2) And objections of this kind may bo founded on the character and constitution of the inferior court, the nature of the subject matter of the enquiry, or the absence of some preliminary proceeding which was necessary to give jurisdiction to the inferior court. (3) The rule for a certiorari is sometimes aljsolute in the tirst instance, but it is usual to grant it nisi oidy, and the argument thereon generally decides the case ; for, if it be made absolute after argu- ment, the conviction is quashed almost as a matter of course when it is afterwards brought up on the certiorari. (4) The rule for the certiorari must specify the omission or mistake or other defect objected to in the conviction, order, or judgment sought to be removed. By the above Article, 887, no certiorari is to be allowed to remove any conviction oi- order had or made before any justice of the peace, if tuk defendant has appealed from such conviction or order. But it appears that, under a proper interpretation of this Article, the defendant may waive his right to ai)peal, and apply for a certiorari. (5) It seems, also, that where the objection taken to a conviction goes to the jurisdiction of the justices, a certiorari may issue, even although the party applying for it has induced the nuigistrate to state a case for the oiiinion of a superior court, and although such case is .still pending before the court. (6) (1) E. V. Brickhall, 33 L. J. M. C. 156. (2) Colonial Bank of Australasia v. Willan, L. R. 5 P. C 417 : 43 L. J. C. P. 39. (3) lb. (4) See E. v. Purdey, 34 L. J. M. C. 4. (5) E. v. Harman, Andr. 343. (0) R. V. Allen and others, 33 L. J, M. C. 98. See Article 900 of the Code, post, as to stating a case for review, on matters of law. CONVICTIONS. — IRRBOULARITIES THEREIN. 869 Still, even where there is no objection to the certiorari issuing before the time for appealing has expired, the court in the exercise of its dis'-retion will refuse to grant it, if, upon the afti- davits in supp(»rt of the applicalion, it api)ears that the ground alleged for it is more j>roperly the subject of appeal (1), or if the defendant before raising the objection to the jurisdiction of the justices endeavored to obtain their decision on the merits; (2) or if the objection is one which ought to have been takon at the hear- ing, instead of being reserved as a ground for qiuishing the convict- ion or order, after it has been made, e, g., the objection of res judi- cata. (3) HHH. Conviction to be TranMniitteil to Appeal Conrt. — Every justice before whom any person is summarily tried, shall transmit the conviction or order to the court to which the appeal is herein given, in and for the district, county or place wherein the offence is allegeil to have been committed, before the time when an appeal from such conviction or order may be heard, there to be kept by the proper officer among the records of the court ; and if such con,viction or order has been appealed against, and a dejiosit of money made, such justice shall return the deposit into the said court ; and the conviction or order shall be presumed not to have been appealed against, until the contraiy is shown. 2. Upon any indictment or information against any person for a subsequent oftence, a copy of such conviction, certified by the proper otticer of the court, or pi'oved to be a true copy, shall be sufficient evidence to prove a conviction for the former ottence. HH9. €on%ietion not to be Hel«l Invaliil for Irre||;nlarlty . — No conviction or order made by any justice of the ])eace and no warrant for enforcing the same, shall, on being removed by certiorari, be held invalid for any irregularity, infor- mality or insufficiency therein, provided that the court or judge before which or whom the question is raised is, upon perusal of the depositions, satisfied that an offence of the nature described in the conviction, order or warrant, has been com>nitted, over which (1) Per Lord Mansfield, R. v. Whitehead, Doug. 550. (2) R. V. J. J. Salop, 29 L. J. M. C 39. (3) R. V. Herrington, 12 W. R. 420. 360 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAOISTRATES. sufh juHtioo has jurisdiction, and that tho piinishiiU'iit imposod is not in excess of that which mi;^ht have hccn liiwl'iiliy inii>oscd for tho said ott'cnco ; and any statemont -wliich, iukUt this act or otherwise, would lie suHicient if contained in a conviction, sliall also be sutticient if contained in an information, summons, or war- rant : Provided that the court or judi^e, where so satisfied as afore- said, shall, even if tho punishment imposed or the order made is in excess oi" that which mif^ht lawfully have been imposed or made, have the like powers in all resi)ects to deal with tho case us .seems just as aro by section 883 conferred upon the court to which an appeal is taken under tho provisions of section 87!*. MHO. Irri>Kiilaritc>N Within tiio Prt'4*('«liii)>; N(>«'- tioil. — The following matters amongst others shall be held to he within tho provisions of tlie next preceding section : — (a.) The statement ot the adjudication, or of any other matter or thing, in the |)ast tense instead of in tho present ; {b.) The ininishment imposed being less than tho punishment by law assigned to tho otience stated in the conviction or order, or' to tho otfenco which appears by the depositions to have been com- mitted ; (c.) The omission to negative circumstances, tho existence of which would make the act complained of lawful, whether such circumsta.-ces aro stated by way of exception or otherwise in tho section under which the offence is laid, or are stated in another section. 2. But nothing in this section contained shall be construed. to restrict tho generality of the wording of the next preceding sec- tion. As to the writ of habeas corpus, iu cases of illegal commitment, see pp. 368-311, post. 8SI1. Protection oi* Justice Wliose Conviction is <|uaHlied. — If an application is made to quash a conviction or order made by a justice, on the ground that such justice has ex- ceeded his jurisdiction, the court or judge to which or whom the application is made, may, as a condition of quashing the same, if the court or judge thinks tit so to do, provide that no action shall MOTION TO QUA81I A CONVICTION. 3G1 bo lirouglit ngiiinst tlu' juntico who made Uie conviction, or nj^ainst any oHiccr acting under any warrant issued to enforce such con- viction or order. Hm, €'oii(lill4»ii of lltMirinic Motion to I|iiunIi. — The Court liaving authority to ([uash any conviction, ordci- or otlier proceeding l\v or iu-tbre a justice may prescribe by general order tlwit no motion to ([uasli any conviction, order or other pro- ceeding l)y or before a justice and brought l)ei'ore such court by certiorari, shall bo entertained uidess the defendant is shown to have entered into a recognizance with one or more sulticiont sure- ties, JK'foro a justice or justices of the county or ]ilacc within which Huch conviction or oi-der iuis boon nuide, or before u judge or other officer, as may lie prescribed by sudi general order, or t() liavo made a de|)osit to l»e pi'oscribed in like manner, with a condition to ]n'0secute such writ of certiorari at his own costs and charges, with etfoct, without any wilful or affected delay, and, if ordered ho to do, to pay the person in whoso favour the conviction, order or other proceeding is affirmed, his full costs and ihargos to be taxed according to the course of the court where such conviction, order or proceeding is attirmed. S1I3. Iiiiporlal Aot Nll|»«'rNedo<l. — The second section of the Imperial Act, ])assed in the fifth year of the reign of Ills Majesty King George the Second, and chaptered nineteen, shall no longer ai)ply to any conviction, order or other pi'oceeding by or before a justice in Cana<la, but the next preceding section of the Code shall be substituted therefor, and the like proceedings may be had for enforcing the condition of a recognizance taken under the above section as might bo had for enforcing the condition of a recognizance taken under the said Imjierial Act. H\\4. Jiidi«ial I¥oiiee ofProclnination. — No order, conviction or other proceeding shall be quashed or set aside, and no defendant shall be discharged, by reason of any objection that evidence has not been given of a prodaniation or order of the Governor-in-Council, or of any rules, regulations, or by-laws made by the Governor in-Council in pursuance of a statute of Canada, or of the publication of such proclamation, order, rules, regulations, or by-laws in the Canada Gazette ; but such proclamation, order, 362 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. rules, regulations and by-laws and the publication thereof shall be judicially noticed. M95. ^o procvdciKlo necessary on Ket'nsal to quash. — If a motion or rule to quash a conviction, order or other ])roceeding is refused or discharged, it shall not be necessarj'^ to issue a writ of precede io, but the order of the Court refusing or discharging the application shall be a sufficient authority for the registrar or other officer of the Court forthwith to return the con- viction, order and proceedings to the Court or Justice from which or whom they were removed, and for proceedings to be taken thereon for the enforcement thereof, as if u procedendo had issued which shall forthwith be done. 89tt. Coiiviction not to be set aside in certain eases. — V.'henever it appears by the conviction that the defend- ant has appeared and ])leaded, aiul the merits have been tried, and the defendant has not appealed against the conviction, wiiere an appeal is ailowec^, or, if appealed against, the conviction has been affirmed, such conviction shall not afterwards be set aside or va- cated in consequence of any defect of form whatever, but tlie con- structi(m shall be such a fair and liberal construction as will be agreeable to the justice of the case. HSI7. Order as to eosts.— 'If upon any a]ii)eal, the Court trying the appeal orders either party to pay costs, the order shall direct the costs to be paid to the ('lerk of the Peace or other pro- per officer of the Court, to be jiaid over by him to the person en- titled to the same, and shall state within what time the costs shall be paid. H9H, Reeovery of eosts. — If such costs are not paid within the time so limited, and the person ordered to pay the same luis not been bound by any recognizance conditioned t»> pay such costs, the Clerk of the Peace or his deputy, on application of the person entitled to the costs, or of any person on liis behalf, and on payment of any fee to which he is entitled, shall grant to the per- son so ap])lying, a certilicate that the costs have nut been j)aid ; and upon production of the certificate to any .Justice in and for the same territorial division, such Justice may enforce the payment CASE FOR REVIEW. 363 of the costs by warrant of distress in manner aforesaid, and in do- fault of distress may commit the person against whom the warrant has issued in manner hereinbefore mentioned, for any term not exceeding one month unless the amount of the costs and all costs and charges of the distress and also the costs of the commitment and conveying of the party to prison, if the justice thinks tit so to order (the amount thereof being ascertained and stated in the com- mitment) are sooner paid. The said certiticate shall be in the form PPP and the warrants of distress and commitment in the forms <iQQ and RRR respectively in schedule one to the Code. (1) H99. Abaiidoniut'iit of appeal. — An appellant may abandon his appeal by giving to the opposite party notice im WRITING of his intention six clear days before the sitting of the Court appealed to, and thereupon the costs of the appeal shall bo added to the sum, if any adjudged, against the appellant by the conviction or order, and the Justice shall proceed on the conviction or order as if there had been no appeal. OOO. fitateiiient of cane b;^ Justice for Review. — In this section the expression " the Court " means and includes any Superior Court of criminal jurisdiction for the province in which the proceedings herein referred to are carried on. 2. Any person aggrieved — the prosecutor or complainant an well as the defendant. — who desires to question a cmviction, order, determination or other proceeding of a Justice under this part, on the ground that it is erroneous in point of law, oris in excess op jurisdiction, may apply to such Justice to state and sign a case setting forth the facts of the case and the grounds on which the proceeding is questioned, and if the Justice declines to state the case, may apply to the Court for an order requiring the case to be stated. 3. The application shall he made and the case stated within such time and in such manner as is, from time to time, directed by rulbb or orders under section 533 of the Code. (2) (1) For forma PPP, QQQ, and RRR, see pp. 395-397, pott. ('2) Article 533 of the Code provides that every Superior Coart of Criminal Jurisdiction may at any time with the concurrence of the Judges thereof 24 364 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. 4. The appellant, at the time of making such application, and before a case is stated and delivered to him by the justice, shall, in every instance, enter into a recognizance before such justice or any other justice exercising the same jurisdiction, with or without surety or sureties, and in such sum as to the justice seems meet, conditioned to prosecute his appeal without delay, and to submit to the judgment of the court and pay such costs as are awarded by the same ; and the a])])ollant shall, at the same time, and before he shall be entitled to have the case delivered to him. pay to the justice such fees as he is entitled to ; and the appellant, if then in custody, shall be liberated uj)on the recognizance being further conditioned for his appearance before the same justice, or such other justice, as is then sitting, within ten days after the judgment of the court has been given, to abide such judgment, unless the judgment appealed against is reversed. 5. If the justice is of opinion that the application is merely frivolous, BUT NOT OTHERWISE, he may refuse to state a case, and bhall, on the request of the applicant, sign and deliver to him a certificate of such refusal ; provided that the justice shall not re- fuse to state a case where the application for that purpose is made to him by or under the direction of Her Majesty's Attorney- General of Canada or of any province. 6. Where the justice refuses to state a case, it shall be lawful for the appellant to apply to the court, upon an affidavit of the facts, for a rule calling upon the justice, and also upon the respondent, to show cause why such case should not be stated ; and such court may make such rule absolute, or discharge the application, with or without payment of costs, as to the court seems meet ; and the juBtice, upon being served with such rule absolute, shall state a case accordingly, upon the appellant entering into such recogniz- ance as hereinbefore provided. 1. The court to which a case is transmitted under the foregoing provisions shall hear and determine the question or questions of present at any meeting held for the purpose make rnles of Court, for, — among other things, — regulating, in criminal matters, the practice and pro* cedare in the Court, including the su ojects of mandamus, certiorari, habeas ooBPUs, PBOHiBrrioN, QUO WARRANTO, BAIL, and COSTS, and the proceedings ander Article 900 of the Code. STATEMENT OF CASE. 365 law arising thereon, and shall thereupon affirm, reverse or modify the conviction, order or determination in i-espect ol \, hich the case has been stated, or remit the matter to the justice with the opinion of the court thereon, and may malse such other order in relation to the matter and such orders as to costs, as to the court seems lit ; and all such orders shall bo Hnal and conclusive upon all parties ; Provided always, that any justice who states and delivers a case, in pursuance of this section, shall not be liable to any costs in respect or by reason (>f such appeal against his determination. 8. The court for the opinion of which a case is stated shall have power, if it thinks fit, to cause the case to be sent back for amend- ment ; and thereupon the same shall be amended accordingly, and judgment shall be delivered after it has been amended. 9. The authority and jurisdiction hereby vested in the court, for the opinion of which a case is; stated, may, subject to any rules and orders of court in i-elation thereto, be exorcised by a judge of such court sitting in chambers, and as well in vacation as in term time. 10. After the decision of the court in relation to any such casQ stated for their opinion, the justice, in relation to whose determina- tion the case has been stated, or any other justice exercising the same jurisdiction, shall have the same authority to enforce any conviction, oi'der or determination which has been affirmed, amend- ed or made by such court as the justice who originally decided the case would have had to enforce his determination if the same had not been appealed against ; and no action or proceeding shall be commenced or had against a justice for enforcing such conviction, order or determituition by reason of any defect in the same. 11. If the court deems it necessary or expedient, any order of the court may be enforced by its own process. 12. No writ of certiorari or other writ shall be required for the removal of any conviction, order or other determination in I'elation to whicdi a case is stated under this section or otherwise, for obtain- ing the judgment or determination of a Superior Court on such Case under this section. 13. In all cases where the conditions, or any of thorn, in any recognizance entered into in pursuance of this section have not been complied with, such recognizance shall be dealt with in the 366 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. like manner as is provided by section 8t8 with resjiect to recog- nizances entered into thereunder. 14. Any person who appeals under the provisions of this section againi^t any determination of a justice from which he is entitled to an appeal under section 879 of the Code, shall be taken to have abandoned such last mentioned right of appeal finally and con- clusively and to all intents and purposes. 15. Where, by any sjtecial Act, it is provided that there shall be no appeal from any conviction or order, no jtroceedings shall be taken under tliis section in any case to which such jjrovision in such special Act applies. The general etfect of the pi'0\i8ion8 of this Article is to enable either part}', in a matter determinable by justices in a summarv manner, — if dissatisfied with and aggrieved by their decision, as being erroneous in point of law, — to obtain the opinion thereon of a Superior Court of criminal jurisdiction, by means of a case stated and signed by the justices for that ])urpose. Among the rules and orders made by the Supreme Court of the X. W. T., in reference to the ])rocedure governing the applicatioii for and the stating of a case for the opinion of a Superior Court, (under sec. 28 of 53 Vic, c. 37, now embodied in the above Article 900), are to be found the following : 1. An application to a justice of the peace to state and sign a case shall be delivered to such justice or left with some person for him at his place of abode within four t»,\ys after the making of the conviction, order, determination orother proceeding questioned. Such application shall state the grounds upon which the proceed- ding is questioned. 2. Within pour days after such application has been so delivered or left for him, the justice shall state and sign and deliver to the appellant a case setting forth the facts of the case and the ground.^ on which the proceeding is questioned, 8t>>ting — (a.) the substance of the information or complaint ; (6.) the names of the prosecutor (or complainant) and the de- fendant ; (c.) the (iate of the proceeding questioned ; STATEMENT OP CASE. 36*7 (d.) the evidence, (if any), in full, as taken before the J. P. ; (e.) the substan ce of the conviction, order, df termination or other proceeding questioned ; (/.) the grounds on which the same is questioned ; (g.) the grounds on which the justice sujjports the proceeding questioned, if the justice sees fit to state any. 3. Within twenty days after the delivery to the appellant of a case stated by a justice, the appellant shall deliver or cause the same to be delivered, (a.) To the Registrar of the Court in banc ; or (b.) (If he desires the matter to be heard or determined by a Judge in Chambers), to the Clerk of the Court of the judicial dis- trict in which the justice i-oaides, provided that upon sufficient cause for the delay being shown, the Court or Judge, as the case may be, may hear and determine the matter, although the case Avas not delivered within said twenty days. (1) Although the evidence is set out in the case, the Superior Court does not put itself in the position of the Justices in deciding on the weight or sufficiency of such evide nee ; but it accepts the findings of the J ustices, upon facts within their jui'isdiction, as conclusive, whatever the Superior Court's own opinion may bo as to the na- ture of the evidence. (2) The Superior Court, in such a case, has only to see whether the determination of the Justices is erroneous in point of law. (3) The main question in the case, namely, whether an ofl'ence has or has not been committed within the statute is a subject involving a question of law ; but the subordinate facts leading up to it are left entirely to the decision of the Justice. The circumstances which lead to the conclusion of law are forthe Justices. And it is for the Superior Court to see whether the facts are sufficient to warrant the legal conclusion which the Justices have drawn from them. (1) McGuire's Mania. Handbook, 75-76. (2) Cornwell v. Sanders, 3 B «& S. 206 ; 32 L. J. M. C, 6. (3) Taylor v. Oram, 31 L. J. M. C, 252. (4) R. v. raffles, 45 L. J. M. C, 61. 368 PKAOTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. Habeas corpus. — When there is any fault or illegality in the commitment under which a defendant is imprisoned, he may ob- tain his discharge by means of a writ of habeas corpus ad subji- ciendum, which may be obtained from a Superior Court of Criminal Jurisdiction or from a Judge of such Court. Its object being to effect deliverance from illegal confinement, it commands the party detaining the prisoner to produce his body, together with a true statement of the cause of his detention ; and it maj' be applied for, issued, and made returnable in Chambers. (1) Although the right to remove the conviction by certiorari be taken away, yet, in moving for a writ of habeas corpus, a certified copy of the conviction may be brought before the Court for the purpose of defeating the commitment. (2) But the certified c('py must be verified by affidavit, and the commissioner before whom the affidavit is sworn ought to certify on the exhibit annexed that it is the document referred to in the affidavit. (3) The application may be for a rule calling on the keeper of the prison to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue to bring up the body of the prisoner, and why in the event of the rule being made absolute he should not be discharged, without the writ of habeas corpus actually issuing and without his being person- ally brought before the Court. (4) Although, when this course is pursued, and the rule is made ab- solute, after being o])posed and cause shown, the defendant may be released by virtue of the rule thus made absolute, it apjtears that, — if no cause is shown, — a writ of habeas corpus must, in that case, issue, before the prisoner can be discharged. (5) Objections to the wi-it of habeas corpus for any irregularity are to be taken by way of substantive motion to set it aside, and not upon the motion to discharge. the prisoner on the return. (6) (1) Re Leonard Wataon & others, 9 A & E., 731. (2) R. v. Mellor, 2 Dowl., 173. (3) Re Allison, 10 Exch. 5«1. (4) Ex parte Eggington, 23 L. J. M. C, 44 ; Re Geswood, 2 El. & Bl., 952. For Form of ]Iabea$ Corput. see p. 402, post. (5) Ex parte, Jacklin, 5 C. B. 103, (a.) (6) R. V. Baines, 12 A. & E. 210, 213. HABEAS CORPUS. 369 Upon receipt of the writ, the gaoler, or other officer having tlie party in custody, returns, along with the body of the prisoner, the warrant of commitment, which, if it be illegal or insufficient on its face, will be quashed and an order will be made for the defendant's release. (1) The Court, upon the return to a writ of habeas corpus have nothing before them, but the warrant of commitment ; but they may, nevertheless, refuse to discharge the prisoner until they have the conviction before them. Thus, where a commitment was " un- til the party should pay a fine " without specifying any sum, the Court refused to discharge him upon the commitment alone ; but when, upon the conviction itself being brought before them, it ap- peared that no precise sum was thereby awarded, they ordered the defendant's discharge. ( 2) As, however, the conviction as recited in the commitment, is prima facie taken to be as recited, it is for the party asserting it to be dif- ferent lo bring it before the Court by certiorari, or, if that process is not available, by affidavit ; and in such a case, if the conviction be right, the defect in the commitmbnt will be cured, provided the latter shows the like offence as is stated in the conviction. (3) With regard to the question of whether the truth of the return to a writ of habeas corpus au subjiciendum can be controverted by means of affidavits, a distinction has been drawn in England be- tween cases in which the writ is issued at common law or under statutes containing or not containing, as the case may be, an ex- press provision on the subject. If the case came within the 31 Car. 2, c. 2, Ttho object of which was to provide, more partigularly, against delays in bringing accused pereons to trial) the English Courts would not receive affidavits impeaching the return. (4) But if the case came within the 56 Geo. 3, c. 100, affidavits were received, because they were admissible by the ex/)ress terms of sees. 3 and 4 of that Act. So, that where prisoners, in custody of a Customs Officer, on a charge of smuggling, were brought up by habeas corpus at common (1 1 See Bac. Ab., Tit. " Habeai> Corpus." (2) B. v. Elwell, Str. 794 ; 2 Ld. Raym. 1514. (3) R. V. Taylor, 7 D. & R. 623. (4) Carus Wilson's Case, 7 Q. B., 984 ; R. v. RoRers, 3 D. <{; R., 607 ; R. ▼. Sheriff of Middlesex. 11 A. k E., 273. 370 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. law, they wore held entitled, under the uljove sections of 5G Geo- 3, c. 100, to controvert the truth of the return by affidavit. Abbott, CM., said, "The writs of habeas corpus in this instance are not to be considered as writs issuing under the 31 Car. 2, but as issuing at common law, under the general authority of the Court, and con- sequently the discussion of the truth of the i-eturn is left open by virtue of the 56 Geo. 3, c. 100, sec. 4. The object of 5(5 Geo. 3. was to give the party a summary remedy by controverting the truth of a return, instead of putting him to an action for a false return." (1) But, even in cases \vithin the 56 Geo. 3, c. 100, it does not a])pear that all statements upon the i-eturn may bo contradicted by attida- vit. .There are certain questions which are exclusively within the province of the tribunal issuing the commitment, and which can- not be opened again before another tribunal, except by appeal or upon a case .stated. Such, for instance, is the weight of evidence) the innocence or guilt of the defendant, and the adjudication of contempt. No other Court except the Court to which an appeal is granted is competent to re-investigate these matters, whether the proceeding be brought before it on return to habeas corpus, t>r cer- tiorari, or in an action against the magistrate. (2) It apjtears that affidavits, to show a want or excess of jurisdic- tion, are admissible whether the case is one at common law or under the statute of Car. 2, or Geo. 3, although they may directly contradict facts stated in the return which, if true, would show jurisdiction and no excess of it. The rule appears to be the same as that which is applied to proceedings by certiorari, where a want or excess of jurisdiction may be shown by affidavit as ground for quashing a conviction or order. The exercise of this privilege does not try the guilt or innocence of the prisoner, upon affidavit ; nor does it impugn the rule that matters on which Justices, acting with- in their jurisdiction, decide shall be held to be conclusive, if found by them ; but, on the contrary, it is a consequence of the salutary maxim that no Judge, by misstating facts, can give himself juris- diction. (3) And. accordingly, on a conviction under the Master (1) Ex parte Beeching, 6 D. & R., 209. (2) Dimes's Case, 14 Q. B., 554. (3) R. V. Bolton, 1 Q. B.., 66 ; R. v. Nunnely, 27 L. J. M. C, 260. ' ' HABEAS CORPUS. ■ • g^l and Servants Act, (4 Geo. 4, c. 34), affidavits Wore admitted to show that there was no evidoncfe before the JiiHticiv'of siich facts as were essential to the exercise of his juns(licti<)n,hflweiy. the contract to serve. (1) The I'csult, briefly stated, of the decisions upon this question see?ns to be, that, if tlie fact found be one essential to jurisdiction, or on which jurisdiction depends, it nuvy be shown that there was NO EVIDENCE before the justices to warrant the finding, but, that, if the fact be merely a fact in the case and a part of it, — ^jurisdiction having attached, — their finding is not, as a general rule, review- able on affidavit, or in any manner excej)t on appeal or t>n a case reserved. (2) After the return is put in and read, it is considei-ed as filed, but the Court may still amend it. (3) If tlie return shows a commitment bad upon its face, the Court will not, on the suggestion that the conviction itself is goo<l, ad- journ the case for the purjjose of having the conviction brought up and of amending the commitment. Nor will the Court look at the conviction unless it is before them, having been brought up by cer- tiorari. (4) If the defect be not on the face of the commitment, but in the conviction, the defendant, besides a writ of habeas corpus to bring up the prisoner and the warrant of commitment, mu st sue out a certiorari directed to the convicting magistrate, — or to the ses- sions or other Court where the conviction has been filed, — to retui-n the conviction into the Court above. (5) OOl* Tender and Payment. — Whenever a warrant of distress has issued against any person, and such person pays or tenders t'o the peace officer having the execution of the same, the (1) Re Bailey and Collier, 23 L. J. M, C, 161. <2) R. V. Huntsworth, 33 L. J. M. C, 131 ; Pal. Sum. Conv., 6 Ed., 421. (3) Canadian Prisoners' Case, nom. Re Watson, 9 A. & E., 731. (4) Ex parte Timson, L. R. 5 Ex. 257 ; 39 L. J. M. C, 129. (5) Re Allison, 10 Excb. 661. 372 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. sum or sums in the warrant mentioned, together with the amount of the expenses of the distress up to the time of payment or tender, the peace officer shall cease to execute the same. 2. Whenever any person is imprisoned for non-payment of any penalty or other sum, he may pay or cause to be paid to the keeper of the prison in which he is imprisoned, the sum in the warrant of commitment mentioned, together with the amount of the costs and charges and expenses therein also mentioned, and the keeper shall receive the same, and shall thereupon discharge the person, if he i» in his custody for no other matter. He shall also forthwith pay over any moneys so received by him to the Justice who issued the warrant. HOS. KetiirnH reHpccting convictions and moneys received. — Every Justice shall, quarterly, on or before the second Tuesday in each of the months of March, June, September and December in each year, make to the Clerk of the Peace or other proper officer of the Court having jurisdiction in appeal, as herein provided, a return in writing, under his hand, of all convictions made by him, and of the receipt and application by him of the moneys received from the defendants, — which return shall include all convictions and other matters not included in some previous return, and shall be in the form SSS in schedule one of the Code. (1) 2. If two or more Justices are present, and join in the convic- tion, they shall make a joint return. 3. In the province of Prince Edward Island such return shall be- made to the Clerk of the Court of Assize of the county in which the convictions are made, and on or before the fourteenth day next before the sitting of the said Court next after such convictions are so made. 4. Every such return shall be made in the said district of Nipis- sing, in the province of Ontario, to the Clerk of the Peace for the county of Renfrew, in the said province. 5. Every justice, to whom any such moneys are afterwai'ds paid, shall make a return of the receipts and application thereof, to tha (1) For Form SSS, see p. 398, po»<. RETURNS OF CONVICTIONS. 313 Court having juriHtliction in uppcal as hereinbeforo provided, — which return Hhall be filed by the Clerk of the Peace or the proper ofBcer of such Court with the records of his office. 6. Every justice, before whom any such conviction takes place or who receives any such moneys, who neglects or refuses to make such return thereof, or wilfully makes a false, partial or incorrect return, or wilfully receives a larger amount of fees than by law he is authorized to receive, shall incur a penalty of eighty dollars, together with costs of suit, in the discretion of the Court, which may be recovered by any person who sues for the same by action of debt or information in any (yourt of record in the province in which such return ought to have been or is made. 7. One moiety of such penalty shall belong to the person suing, and the other moiety to Her Majesty, for the j)ublic uses of Canada. In Ontario, returns are required by the Eevised Statutes, c. V6, and must include convictions under Provincial Acts. 003. Fublicatioii ^c„ of KrtiiriiN.— The clerk of the peace ol' the district or county in which any such returns are made, or the j>roper officer, other than the clerk of the peace, to whom such returns are made, shall, within seven days after the adjournment of the next ensuing General or Quarter Sessions, or of the term or sitting of such other court as aforesaid, cause the said returns to be posted up in the court-house of the district or county, and also in a conspicuous place in the office of such clerk of the peace, or other proper officer, for public inspection, and the same shall continue to te so posted up and exhibited until the end of the next ensuing General or Quarter Sessions of the peace, or of the term or sitting of such other court as aforesaid ; and for every schedule so made and exhibited by such clerk or officer, he shall be allowed such fee as is fixed by competent authority. 2. Such clerk of the peace or other officer of such district or county, within twenty days after the end of each Greneral or Quar- ter Sessions of the peace, or the sitting of sv ih court as aforesaid, shall transmit to the Minister of Finance and Eeceiver General a true copy of all such returns made within his district or county. 374 PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. 1104. FroNveii t ioiiN for PonaltleN under Article ttOSi* — All lu-tioiiH for )ienaltieHuri8ing under tlio pio- visioiiH of Hoc'lioii !K(2 sliall ho cominencod within six months next uf'tor the cause of action accrues, and the same siiall bo tried in the dintrict, county or place wVierein such peiuilties have been incurred; and if a verdict or judgment passes for the defendant, or the ))laintitt' becomes non-suit, or discontinues tJie action after issue joined, or if upon denuirrer or otherwise, judgment is given against the plaintitf, the defendant shall, in the discretion of the court, recover his costs of suit, as between solicitor and client, and shall have the like remedy for the same as any defendant has by law in other cases. 009. Rciiie<IIt»s Na%'rd. — Nothing in the three sections next preceding shall have the elt'ect of preventing any ))er8on aggrieved from prosecuting, by indictment, any justice, for any ottence. *'>: commi8si(m of which would subject him to indictment at the time of the coming into force of this Act. 006« Defective Returns.— No return purporting to be made by any justice under this Act shall be vitiated by the fact of its including, by mistake, any convictions or orders had or made before him in any matter over which any Provincial Legislature has exclusive jurisdiction, or with respect to which he acted under the authority of any provincial law. 907. Certain Det'eetfi not to Titiate Proeeed- ln{;;H. — No information, summons, conviction, order or other PROCEEDING shall be held to charge two otfences, or shall be held to be uncertain on account of its stating the ottence to have been committed in ditferent modes, or in respect of one or other of sev- eral articles, either conjunctively 'or disjunctively ; for example, in charging an olfencQ under section 508 of the Code, it may be al- leged that " the defendant unlawfully did cut, break, root up and otherwise destroy or damage a tree, sa2)ling or shrub " ; and it shall not be necessary to detine more particularly the nature of the act done, or to state whether such act was done in respect of a tree, or a sapling, or a shrub. ' I'KB-IERVINO OKDKH IN COUUT. 376 09H, PrcNorviiiK order in Court.— Hvory .lud^o of SessioiiH of till! I'ouw. Clmiriiiiiii of the Court of (lonoral SoHHions of Iho Peace, Police Maoist ruto. District MugiHtnite or Stipendiary MagiHtrate, Hhall have hucIi and lil<e powers an<l aiitliority to pre- serve order in tlie said (Courts during the iiolding tliereof, and by the lilvi! ways and means as now hy law are or may lie exercised and used in lilce cases and for the lilie jiurposos by any Court in Canada, or by the judges thereof, during tlie sittings thereof. See comments and authorities upon this sul»ject at pp. 36-39, ante. O01I. KeNiNtanre to execution of* proeens. — (As amended by 5(1 Vic, c. 32.) Every Judge of the Sessions of the PeacJ. Cliairman of thi- Court of General Sessions of tlie Peace, Eecorder, Police Magistrate, District Magistrate or Stipendiary Magistrate, whenever any resistance is offered to the execution of any summons, warrant of execution or f)ther process issued by him, may enforce the due execution of the same by the means pro- vided by the law for enforcing the execution of the process of other courts in like cases. FORMS UNDKR PART LVIII. OF THK COD?] YY.— (Section 859.) CONVICTION FOR A PENALTY TO BE LEVIED BY DISTRESS AND IN DEFAULT OF SUFFICIENT DISTRESS, BY IMPRISONMENT. Canada, Province of County of } Be it remembered that on the day of , in the year , at , in the said county, A. B. is convicted before the undersigned, , a Justice of the Peace for the said county, for that the said A. B. (cfec, stating the offence, and the time and place when and where committed), and I adjudge the said A. B. for his said offence to forfeit and pay the sura of $ 3*76 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO .MAGISTRATES. (stating the penalty, and also the compensation, if any), to be paid and applied according to law and also to pay to the said C. 1). the sum of , foi' his costs in this behalf ; and if the said several sums are not paid forthwith, (or'on or before the of next). * J order that the same be levied by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said A. B., and in default of sufticient distress, * I adjudge the said A. B. to be imprisoned in the common gaol of the said county, at in the said county of , there to be kept at haul labour, (//■ such is the sentence) for the term of , unless the said several sums and all costs and charges of the said distx-ess (and of the commitment and conveying of the said A. \i. to the said gaol) are sooner paid. Given iinder my hand and seal, the day and year first above mentioned, at . in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal.] J. P., {Name of cotinty.) * Or when the issuing of a distress warrant would be ruinous to the defendant and his family, or it appears he has no goods uheieon to levy a distress, then instead of the w< rds between the asterisks * * say, in- asmuch as it is now made to a])pear to me that the issuing of a warrant of distress in this behalf would be ruinous to the said A. B.. and his family," {or, " that the said A. B. has no goods or chattels whereon to levy the .said sums by distress.'). yfW .—{Section 859.) CONVICTION FOR A PENALTY, AND IN DEFAULT OF PWMENT IMPRISONMENT. Canada, Province of County of :! Be it remembered that on the day of in the year , at , in ♦^he said county, A. B. is convicted before the undersigned, . a Justice of 'the FORMS. 3*77 Peace for the said county for that he the said A. B. (&c., stating the offence, and the time and place when and where it was committed), and I adjudge the said A. B. for his said ottence to forfeit and pay the sum of (stating the penalty and the compensation, if any) to be paid and applied according to hvw ; and also to pay to the said C. I), the sum of for his costs in this behalf ; and if the aaid several sums are not paid forthwith (or, on or before next), I adjudge the said A. B. to be imprisoned in the common gaol of the saiil county, at in the said county of (and there to be kept at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said sums and the costs and charges of conveying the said A. B. to the said common gaol are sooner paid. Given under my hand and seal, the day and year first above mentioned at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal.] J. P., (iVrt/ne of county) XX.— (Section 859.) CONVICTION WHEN THE PUNISHMENT IS BY IMPRISONMENT, ETC. Canada, Province of County of :! Be it remembered that on the day of , in the year , at , in the said county, A. B. is convicted before the undersigned, , a justice of the peace in and for the said county, for that ho the said A. B. (&c., stating the offence, and the time and place when and where it was committed) ; and I adjudge the said A. B. for his said ottence to be imprisoned in the common gaol of the said county, at , in the county of , (and there to be kept at hard labour) for the term of ; and I also adjudge the said A. B. to pay to the said C. D. the sum of , for his costs in this behalf, and if the said sum for costs are not paid forthwith {or on or before next), then * I order that the said sum be levied by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said A. B. ; and in default of sufti- 378 PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. cient distre«8 in that behalf, * I adjudge the said A. B. to be im- prisoned in the said common gaol and kept there at hard labour for the term of , to commence at and from the term of his imprisonment aforesaid, unless the said sum for costs is sooner paid. Given under my hand and seal, the day and year tirst above mentioned at , in the county aforesaid. J. S. [seal.] « J. P. {Navie of county.) *0r, when the isswng of a distress warrant would be ruinous to the defendant and his family, or it appears that he has no goods whereon to levy a distrets, then instead of the words between the asterisks * * say, •'inasmuch as it is now nuide to appear to me that the issuing of a warrant of distress in this behalf would be ruinous to the said A. B. and his family," {or, '" that the said A. B. has no goods or chattels whereon to levy the said sum for costs by distress.") YY.— {Section 851).) ORDER For PAYMENT OF MONEY TO BE LEVIED BY DISTRESS AND IN DEFAULT OF DISTRESS IMPRISONMENT. Canada, Province of County of :} Bo it i^emembered that on , complaint was made before the undersigned, . a justice of the peace in and for the said county of , for that (stating the facts entitling the complainant to the order, with the time and place when and where they occurred), and now at this day. to wit, on , at the parties aforesaid appear before me the said juMtice (or the said C. D. appears bel'ore me the said justice, but the said A. B., although duly called, does not appear by himself, his counsel or attorney, and it is now satisfactorily proved to me on oath that the said A.B. was duly served with the summons in this behalf, which required him to be and appear here on this day before me or such justice or jus- FORMS. 379 tices of the peace for the county, as should now be here, to answer the said coraphiint, and to be further dealt with according to law) ; and now having heard the matter of the said complaint, 1 do ad- judge the said A. B. to pay to the said C. I), the sum of forthwith {or on or before next, or as the Act or low re- quires), and also to pay to the said C. I), the sum of for his costs in this behalf ; and if the said several sums are not paid forthwith (or on or before next), then, * I hereby order that the same be levied by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said A. B, and in default of sufficient distress in that behalf * I adjudge the said A. B. to be imprisoned in the common gaol of the said county, at , in the said county of , (and there kept at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said several sums, and all costs ami charges of the said distress (and the commitment and conveyance of the said A. B. to the said common gaol) are sooner paid. Given under my hand and seal, this day of in the year , at in the county aforesaid. J. y. [seal.] J P. (Name of County.) * Or, when the issuinq of a distress warrant would be ruinous to the defendant and his family, or it appears he has no goods whereon to levy a distrei-s, then, instead of the words between the asterisks * * say. "inasmuch as it is now nuule to appear to me that the issuing of a warrant of distress in this behalf would be ruinous to the said A.B. and his familj'," (or " that the said A. B. has no goods or chattels whereon to levy the said sums by distress.") 7j7j.— (Section 85t».) ORDER FOR I'AY.MENT OP MONEY, AND IN DEFAULT OF PAVMF.NT IMPRISONMENT. Canada, Province of County of :! Be it remembered that on j complaint was made before the undersigned, , a justice of the peace in and for 25 380 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. the said county of , for that (stating the facts en- titling the complainant to the order, with the time and place when and where they occurred^, and now on this day, to wit, on , at , tho parties aforesaid appear before me the said justice (or said C D. appears before me the said justice, but the said A. B., although duly called, does not appear by himself, his counsel or attorney, and it is now satisfactorily proved to me upon oath that the said A. B. was dul}' served with the summons in this behalf, which required him to be and appear here this da}' before me, or such juntice or justices of the peace for the said county, as should now be here, to answer to tho said complaint, and to be further dealt with according to law, and now having heard the matter of the said complaint, I do adjudge the said A. B. to pay to the said C. D. the sum of forthwith (or on or before next, (or as the Act or law requires), and also pay to the said C. I), the sum of for his costs in this be- half ; and if the said several sums are not ]iaid forthwith (or on or before next), then I adjudge the said A. B. to be im- prisoned in the common gaol of the said county at , in the said county of . (there to be kejit at hard labour if the Act or law authorizes this) for the term of unless tho said several suras (and costs and charges of commitment and conveying the said A. B. to the said common gaol) are sooner paid. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in the year , at . in the county aforesaid. • J. S., [seal.] J- P., (Name of county.) AAA.— (Section 859.) ORDER FOR ANY OTHER MATTER WHERE THE DISOBEYING OF IT IS PUNISHABLE WITH IMPRISONMENT. Canada, Province of County of :! Bo it remembered that on , complaint was made before the undersigned, , a justice of the j^eace in and FORMS. 381 for the said county of , for that (stating the facts en- titling the complainant to the order with the time and place where and when they occurred) ; and now on this day, to wit, on , at , the parties aforesaid appear before me the said justice (or the said C D. appears before me the said justice, but the said A. B., although duly called, does not appear by himself, his counsel or attorney, and it is now satisfactorily proved to me, upon oath, that the said A. B. was duly served with the summons in this behalf, which required him to be. and appear here this day before mo, or such justice or justices of the peaqe for the said county, as should now be here to answer to the said complaint, and to be further dealt with according to law) ; and now having heard the matter of the said complaint, J do adjudge the said A. B. to (here state the matter required to be done), and if, upon a copy of the minute of this order being served upon the said A. B., either l»orsonally oi' b}' leaving the same for him at his last or most usual place of abode, he neglects or refuses to obey the same, in that case I adjudge the said A. B., for such his disobedience, to be im- prisoned in the common gaol of the said county, at , in the said county of , there to be kept at hard labour (if the statute authorizes this), for the term of unless tlie said order is sooner obeyed, and I do also adjudge the said A. B. to pay to the said C. D. the sum of for his costs in this behalf, and if the said sum for costs is not paid forthwith (or on or before next), I order the same to be levied by/listress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said A. B,, and in default of suflflcient distress in that behalf I adjudge the said A. li. to be imprisoned in the said common gaol (there to be kept'^at hard labour) for the space of , to commence at and from the termination of his imprisonment aforesaid, unless the said sum for costs is sooner paid. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [sbal] J. P., (d/ame of county.) 382 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. BBB.— (Section 8(J2.) FORM OK ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF AN INFORMATION OR COM- PLAINT. Canada, ^ Province of , > County of , } lie it reniemberocl tliat on , information was laid (^or complaint was made) before the iindorsigiu'd. , a justice of the peace in and for the said county of for that ((fcc, as in the sumvions of the defendant), and now at this day, to wit, on , at , (if at any adjournment insert here : " to which day the hearing of this case was duly adjourned, of which the said C. D. had due notice,") both the said parties api)ear before me in order that I should hear and determine the said information (^or complaint) (or the said A. B. appears before me. but the said C. I)., although duly called, does not appear) ; [whereupon the matter of the said information (or complaint) being by me duly considered, it manifestly appears to me that the said intV>rmation (or complaint) is not proved, and] (vY the informant or complainant does not appear, these words may be omit- ted), I do therefore dismiss the same, and do adjudge that the said C. D. do pay to the said A. B. the sum of , for his costs incurred by him in defence in his behalf ; and if the said sum for costs is not paid forthwith (or on or before ), I order that the same be levied by distress and sale of the goods and chat- tels of thesaid C, I)., and in ilefault of sutticient distress in that behalf, I adjudge the said C. D. to be imprisoned in the common gaol of the said county of , at , in the said county of , (and there kept at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said sum for costs, and all costs and charges of the waid distress (and of the commitment and conveying of the said C. 1). to the said common gaol) are sooner paid. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal.] J. P., (Name of county.) FORMS. 383 CCC— (Section 862.) FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF DISMISSAL. I hereby certify that an iiifoi-mation (or complaint) preferred by C. I). again.st A. B. for that (&c., as in the summons) was thin (lay considered by me, a justice of the peace in and for the said county of . and was by me dismissed (with costs). Dated at , this day of , in the year J. S., J. P., (Name of county ) DDT).— (Section 872.) WARRANT OF DISTRESS UPON A CONVICTION FOR A PENALTY. Canada. Province of County of ;i To all or anj- of the constables and other peace officers in the said county of Whereas A, B., late of , (labourer'), was on this day (or on last past) duly convicted before , a justice of the peace, in and for the said county of , for that (stating the offence, as in the conviction), and it was thereby adjudged that the said A. B. should for such offence, forfeit and pay (&c., as in the conviction), and should also pay to the said C. D, the sura of , for his costs in that behalf ; and it was thereby ordered that if the said several sums were not paid (forthwith) the same should be levied by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said A.B., and it was thereby also adjudged that the said A. B., in default of suiftcient distress, should be imprisoned in the common gaol of the said county, at , in the said county of (and there kept at hard labour) for the space of , unless the said several sums and all costs and charges of the said distress, and of the commitment and conveying of the said A. B. to the said common gaol were sooner paid ; * And whereas the said A. B., being so 384 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. convicted as aforesaid, and being (now) required to pay the said sums of and has not paid the same or any part thereof, but therein has made default : These are, therefore, to command you, in Her Majesty's name, forthwith to make distress of the goods and chattels of the said A. B. ; and if within days next after the making of such distress, the said sums, together with the reasonable charges of taking and keeping the distress, arc not paid, then to sell the said goods and chattels so by you distrained, and to pay the money arising from such sale unto me, the convict- ing justice (or one of the convicting justices), that 1 may pay and apply the same as by law directed, and may render the overplus, if an}', on demand, to the said A. B. ; and if no such distress is found then to certify the same unto me, that such further proceedings may be had thereon as to law appertain. Given under ray hand and seal, this day of , in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal] J. P., {Name of county.) EBB. -(Section 812.) warrant of distress upon an order for the pay.ment of money. Canada, Province of County of :! To all or any of the peace officers in the said county of , Whereas on , last past, a complaint was made before , a justice of the peace in and for the said county, for that (&c., as in the order), and afterwards, to wit, on , at , the said parties appeared before (as in the order), and thereupon the matter of the said complaint having been considered, the said A. B. was adjudged to pay to the said C. D. the sum of , on or before then next, and also to pay to the said C. D. the sum of , for his costs in that behalf ; and it was ordered that if the said several sums were not paid on or before the said then next, the same should be F0RU8. 385 levied by distress and sale of the goods a^d chattels of the said A, B., and it was adjudged that in default of sufficient distress in that behalf, the said A. B. should be imprisoned in the common gaol of the said county, at in the said county of (and there kept at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said several sums and all costs and charges of the distress (and of the commitment and conveying of the said A. B. to the said common gaol) were sooner paid ; *And whereas the time in and by the said order appointed for the payment of the said several sums of , and has elapsed, but the said A. B. has not paid the same, or any part thereof, but therein has made default : These are, therefore, to command you, in Her Majesty's name, forthwith to make distress of the goods and chattels of the said A. B., and if within the sjmce of days after the making of such distress, the said last mentioned sums, together with the reasonable charges of taking and keeping the said dis- ti'esH, are not paid, then to sell the saiil goods and chattels so by you distrained, and to pay the money arising from such sale unto me (or some other of the convicting justices, as the case may be), that I (or he) may pay or apply the same as by law directed, and may vender the overplus, if any, on demand to the said A. B. ; and if no such distress can be found, then to certify the same unto me, to the end that such proceedings may be had therein, as to law ap- pertain. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal.] J. P., {Name of county.) FFF.— (Section 872.) WARRANT OF COMMITMENT UPON A CONVICTION FOR A PENALTY IN THE FIRST IN8TANCK. Canada, Province of County of To all or any of the constables and other peace officers in the county of , and to the keeper of the common gaol at , in the said county of :l 386 I'RACTICAI, UUrDE TO MAGISTRATES. Whereas A. "B., late of , (^labourer), wuh on this day coiiviotod hetbre the uiulersigned , a justice of the |)cace in and for the said cotmty, for that (stating the offence, as in the conviction), and it was thereby adjudged that the said A. B., for his ortenee, should forfeit and pay the sum of (jbc. as in the conviction'), and should ))ay to the said C. D. the sum of for his costs in that behalf ; and it was thereby further adjiulged that il'the said several sums were not paid (forthwith) the said A. U. should be im])risoned in the common gaol of the county at , in the said county oi' (and there kept at hard labour) for the tei-m of , unless the said several sums (and the costs and charges of conveying the said A. li. to the said common gaol) were sooner paid ; And whereas the time in and by the said conviction a})pointed for the payment of the said several sums has elapsed, but thesaid A. B. has not paid the same, or any part thereof, but therein has made default : These are, therefore, to command you, the said peace otiicers, or any of you, to take the said A. B, and him safely to convey to the common gaol at aforesaid, and there to deliver him to the said keeper thereof, together with this precept : And I do hereby command you, the said keeper of the said common gaol, to receive the said A. B., into your custody in the said common gaol, there to imj)rison him (and keep him at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said several sums (and costs and charges of carrying him to the said common gaol, amounting to the further sum of ), are sooner paid unto you, the said keeper ; and for your so doing, this shall be your sufficient warrant. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , 't: the year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal.] J. P., {Name of county.) FORMS. SSiT GGG.— (Section 872.) WARRANT OV CO.MMITMENT ON AN ORDER IN THK FIRST INSTANCE. Camidn, ") Province of , >■ County of , ) To nil or any of the constables and otlier peace officers in the sai<l county of , anil to the keeper of tiie common gaol of the county of , at , in the said county of Whereas, on last past, complaint was ma<le before the under.signed , a justice of the peace in and for the said county of , for that (d-c, as in the order.) and afterwards, to wit, on the day of , fit A. B. and C. D. ajjjieared before me, the said justice (or as it is in the order,) and thereujion ha\-ing considered the matter of the com- plaint, I adjudged the said A. B. to pay the said C. D. tlie sum of , on or before the day of then next, and also to pay to the said C. 1). the sum of , for his costs in that behalf; and I also thereby adjudged that if the said several sums were not jiaid on or before the day of then next, the said A. B. should be imprisoned in the common gaol of the county of , at , in the said county of (and there be kept at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said several sums (and the costs and charges of conveying the said A. B. to the said common gaol, as the case may be) wei'o sooner paid ; And whereas the time in and by the said order appointed for the payment of the said several sums of money has elapsed, but the said A. B. has not paid the same, or any part thereof, but therein has made default : These are, therefore, to command you, the said peace officers, or any of you, to take the said A. B. and him safely to convey to the said common gaol, at aforesaid, and there to deliv'cr him to the keeper thereof, together with this precept : And I do hereby command you, the said keeper of the said common gaol, to receive the said A. B. into your custody in the said common gaol, there to imprison him (and keep him at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said several sums (and the cost and charges of conveying him to the said common gaol, amounting to 388 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAQISTRATEB. tho further sum of ), are sooner paid unto you the said keeper : and for your so doing, this shall be your sufHcient warrant. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in tho year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [SKAL.] J. p., (^Name of county.') :! JIUH.— (Section 874.) ENDORSEMENT IN BACKING A WARRANT OF DISTRESS. Canada, Province of County of Whereas proof upon oath has this day been made before me , a justice of the peace in and for the said county, that the name of J. S. to the within warrant subscribed is of the handwriting of the justice of the peace within mentioned, I do therefore autho- rize W. T., who brings me this warrant, and all other persons to whom this warrant was originally directed, or by whom the same may be lawfully executed, and also all peace officers in the said county of , to execute the same within the said county, Given under my hand, this day of , one thousand eight hundred and O.K. J. P., {Name of county.) III.— {Section S12.) constable's return to a WARRANT OF DISTRESS. I, "W. T., constable, of , in the county of , hereby certify to J. S., Esquire, a justice of the peace in and for the county of , that by virtue of this warrant I have made diligent search for the goods and chattels of the within mentioned A. B., and that I can lind no sufficient goods or chattels of the said A. B. whereon to levy the sums within mentioned. Witness my hand, this day of , one thousand eight hundred and W. T. FORMS. 389 J3J.—(^Section 872.) WARRANT OF COMMITMINT FOR WANT OF DISTRESS. Canada, ^ Province of , > County of , J To all or any of the constables and other peace officers in the county of , and to the keeper of the common gaol of the said county of ■ , at , in the said county. Whereas («&(?., as in either of the foregoing distress warrants, DDD or EKK, to the asterisk^* and then thm) : And whereas, afterwards on the day oi" , ip tlie year aforesaid, I, the said justice, issued a wai'rant to all or any of the peace officers of the county of , cotnmanding them, or any of them, to levy the said sums of and by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said A. B. ; And whereas it appears to rac, as well by the return of the said warrant of distress, by the peace officer who had the execution of the same, as otherwise, that the said jjcace officer has made diligent search for the goods and chattels of the said A. B., but that no sufficient distress whereon to levy the sums above mentioned could bo found : These are, therefore, to command you, the said peace officers, or any of you, to take the said A. B., and him safely to convey to the common gaol at , aforesaid, and there deliver him to the said keeper, together with this precept : And I do hereby command you, the said keeper of the said common gaol, to receive the said A. B. into your custody, in the said common gaol, there to im- prison him (and keep him at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said several sums, and all the costs and charges of the said distress (and of the commitment and conveying of the said A. B. to the said common gaol) amounting to the further sum of , jire sooner paid unto you, the said keeper ; and for so doing this shall be your sufficient warrant. Given under my hand and seal, this day of ," in the year , at .in the county aforesaid. J. S. [SBAL.] J. P. (Name of county.) 390 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. KKK.— (Section 873.) WARRANT OP DISTRESS FOR COSTS UPON AN ORDER FOR DI8.MISSAL OP AN INFORMATION OR COMPLAINT. C'anuda, Province of County of :1 To all or any of the constables and othei' peace officers in the said county of Whereas on last past, information was laid (or com- ])laint was made) before , a justice of the peace in and for the said eounty of . fur that (dr.. as in the order of dismissal) and afterwards, to wit. on - . at , botii parties appearing before , in order that (I) should hear and determine the same, and the several ])roofs ad- duced to (mo) in that behalf, being by (me) duly heard and con- sidered, and it manifestly a]>pearing to (nie) that the said informa- tion (or complaint) was not proved, (I) therefore dismissed the same and adjudged that the said C. B. should pay to the said A. B. the sum of , for his costs incurred by him in his de- fence in that behalf; and (I) ordered that if the said sum for costs was not paid (forthwith) the same .should be levied on the goods and chattels of the said ('. 1)., and (1) adjudged that in default of sufficient distre.s.sjn that behalf the said ('. D. should be imprisoned in the common gaol of the said county of , at , in the said coun.ty of (and there kept at liard labour) for the space of . unless the said sum for costs, and all costs and charges of the said distress, and of the commitment and conveying of the said A. B. to the said common gaol, were sooner ])aid ; * And whereas the said 0. D. being now required to ])ay to the said A. B. the said sum for costs, has not paid the same, or any part thereof, but therein has made default : These are, theret'ove, to command you, in llev Majesty's name, forthwith to make distress (»f the goods and chattels of the said C. D., and if within the term of days next after the making of such distress, the said last mentioned sum, together with the reasonable charges of taking and keeping the said distress, shall not be paid, then to sell the said goods and chattels so by you FORMS. 391 (lislniined. and lo pay tho money arising from such Bale to (we) that (I), may pay and apply the same as by hiw directed, and may render the overplus (if any) on demand to the said C. I)., and if no distress can be found, then to certify the same unto me (or to any other justice of the peace for the same county), that such pro- ceedings may he had therein as to law appertain. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in the year . at , in the count}' aforesaid. J. S.. [SKAL.] J. P., {Name of county.) Lhh.— (Section STH.) WARKANT OF CO.MMITMENT FOR WANT OF DISTRESS. Canada, Province of County of :i To all or an}' of the constables and other peace olticers in the said county of , and to the keeper of the common gaol of the said county of , at .in the said county of Whereas (&c.. as in form KKK to the asterisk, * and then thus) : And whereas atterwar<ls. on the day of , in the year aforesaid. I, the said justice, issued a warrant to all or any of the ])eace otficers of the said (.'ounty, commanding them, or anyone of them, to levy the said sum of , for costs, by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said ('. D. And whereas it ajtpears to me, as well by the return to the said warrant of distress of the peace otticer charged with the execution of the same as otherwise, that the saiil jieacc officer has made diligent search for the goods and chattels of the said C. 1>. hut that no suffi- cient distress whereon to levy the sum above mentioned could Ihj found : These are, therefore, to command you. the said peace officers, or any one of you, to take the said C. I)., and him safely convey to the common gaol of the said county, at aforesaid, and there deliver him to the keeper thereof, together with tiiis precept : 392 PRACTICAL GUIDE fO MAGISTRATES. And I hereby command yoii, the said keeper of the said common gaol to receive tl.<. lid C. D. into your custody in the said common gaol, there to imprison him (and keep him at hard labour) for the term of , unless the said sum, and all the costs and charges of the said distress (and of the commitment and conveying of the said C. D. to the said common gaol, amounting to the further sum of ), are sooner ]>aid unto you the said keejier ; and for your so doing, this shall be your sufficient warrant. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal] J. P., {Name of county.) yiMM.— {Section 878.) certificate of non-appearance to be endorsed un tile defendant's recognizance. I hereby certify that the said A. B. has not appeared at the time and place in the said condition mentioned, but therein has made default, by reason whereof the within written recognizance is forfeited. .1. S., [seal] J. P., {Name of county.) NNN.— (Section 880.) notice of appeal against a conviction or order. To C. D., of , and {the names and additions of the parties to whom the notice of appeal is required to be given.) Take notice, that I, the undersigned, A. B. of intend to enter and prosecute an appeal at the next General Sessions of the peace {or other Court, as the case may be) to be holden at , in and for the county of , against a certain conviction {or order) bearing date on or about the day of instant, and made by (you) J. S., Esquire, a justice of the peace in and for the said county of , whereby I, the said A. B. FORMS. was convicted of having (or was ordered) to pay , {here state the offence as in the conviction, information, or summons, or the amount adjudged to be paid, as in the order, as correctly as possible.) Dated at , this day of , one thousand eight hundred and A. B. Memorandum. — If this notice is given by several defendants, or by an attorney, it may be adapted to the case. 000.— (Section S80.) FORM OF RECOONIZANCE TO TRY THE APPEAL. Canada, "^ Province of , > County of , 3 Be it remembered that on . , A. B., of {labourer), and L. M., of (grocer), and N. O. of , (yeoman), personally came before the under- signed , a justice of the peace in and for the said county of , and severally acknowledged themselves to owe to our Sovereign Lady the Queen, the several suras following that is to say, the said A. B. the sum of , and the said L. M. and N. O. the sum of , each, of good and lawful money of Canada, to be made and levied of their several goods and chattels, lands and tenements respectively, to the use of our said Lady the Queen, her heirs and successors, if he the said A. B. fails in the conditio-' endorsed (or hereunder written). Taken and acknowledged the day and year tirst above mentioned, at , before me. J. S., J. P., (Name of county.) The condition of the within (or the above) written recognizance is such that if the said A. B. personally appears at the (next) (loneral Sessions of the peace (or other court discharging the functions 304 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. ' of the court oj General Sessions, as the case may be), to be hoUlon ni , on the day of , next, in and for the said t-ounty of , and tries an appeal against a certain conviction, bearing date the day of {instant), and made by (me) the said justice, whereby be, the said, A. H., was convicted, for that he. the said A. B., did, on the day of , at . in the said county of , (here set out the offence as stated in the conviction) ; and also abides by the judgment of the court upon such a])[»eal. and pays sudi costs as are by the court awarded, then the said recognizance to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and virtue. FORM OK NOTICE OF SUCH KECOONIZANCE TO BE GIVEN TO THE APPELLANT AND HIS SURETIES. Take notice, that you. A. Ji.. are bound in the sum of and you L. ^I. and X. O. in the sum of . each, that you. the said A. B. will personally appear at the next (Jeneral Sessions of the peace to be holden at , in and for the said county of , and try an apjteal against a conviction {or order) dated the day of . {mstant) whereby you A. B. were convicted of (or ordered, &c.). {stating offence or the subject of the order shortly), and abide by the judgment of the court ui)on sucli a])i)eal and pay sudi costs as are by (he court awarded, and unless you the said A. H. personally ai)pear and try such appeal and abide by such judgment and pay such costs accordingly, the recognizance entered into by you will forthwith be levied on you and each of you. j Dated at , this , day of , , one thousand eight hundred and ' ' FORMS. 3!);") 'PPP.—iSectMi 8!tS.) CERTIFICATE (»F CLERK OK THE PEACE THAT TIIK COSTS 01' AN Al'l'EAr. ARE NOT I'AIO. OHice ot'llu' cli'rk of the pojicc for Uio comity of Title of the Appeal. T lu'vcbv certify that at a court of (u'licral Sessions of tlic poju-o, or other c(Airi (Itsrhnrijing the functions of the' court of General Semons, as the ease maij be), liohlcn at , in and for the said county, oiii ■ - hist past, an appeal by A. 15. ai^ainst a conviction (^or order) of J. S., Ksijuirc. a justice of the peace in and for the Kjiid county, came on to be tried, and was tliere heard and determined, and the said court of (icnerul Hessions (or other court, as the case may he) thereupon ordered that the said conviction (or order) should bo coiilii'med (or (luashed), and that tlie said (a])peliant) should pay to the said (respondent) the sum of . for his costs incurred by him in tiie said ai)]ica]. and which sum was thereby ordered to be jiaid to the clerk of the peace for the said county, on or before the (lay of {instant), to be by him handetl over to the said (respi;ndenl), and 1 further certify tliat the said sum for costs lias not, nor has any jiart thereof, been paid, in obedience to the said order, , Dati'd at .this day of , one thou- sand eight hundred and cj. jr., Clerk of the Peace. (^(l^l— {Section 808.) WARRANT OF DISTRESS FOR COSTS OF AN AI'PEAL AUAINST A CON- VICTION OR ORDER. Canada, "| Province of , >• County of , } To all or any of the constables and other jieacc otiicers in the said county of ^ 26 3!M) IMlACTirAI, (ll'fDE TO MAGISTRATES. Whereas (t£-c., fl.s in the warrants of distress, BDD or EEE, and to the end of the statement of the conviction or order, and then thus) ; Aiul whoroas thosaid A. 15. a])|»oiili'(l to llu'conrl of (loncral Sessions of ilu' poavc {or other court discharyimj' the functions of the court of General Sessio)iS, as the case rnaii be) for tlic said i-ounty. against tlio said conviction or ordir. in wliidi apjtoal the said A. !>. was the a])pcllant, and tlio said (". I), {or J. S., I'Isqniro, llic jiistii^'of tlic peace wlio made the said conviction or ordei') was the res])ondent, and wiiieli said api)eal came on to Ik^ Irii'd and was hrard and deter- mined at the hist General Sessions of the ]>eace {or other court, as the case may be) for I he sai<l county, holden at , on ; and the said conrt therenpon orderi'd that the said conviction ('//• order) shonld lie contirnitMi ('jnjuashed) and that I he said (a|)pellani) should pay to the said (n-spomlent) the snni of , for ins costs incurred hy lum in the said appeal, whith said sum was to he ])aid to the clerk of the peace tor the said c(mnty. on or before the day of . one thousand eight hundred and to l)e by him haui.ed over to the saiilC. J). ; and whereas tin' clerk of tlie peace of the said county has. on tlu' day of (ms^anif), 'Inly certilied that the said sum for costs had not been paid : * These are. therefore, to command you. in Her Majesty's name, forthwith to make distress of the ii'oods and (diattels of the said A. H..and if. within theterin of days next after the making of sued i distress, the said last nu'ntioncd sum. together with the reasonable chargi's of taking and keeping the said (li>tress, are not jiaid, then to sell the said goods and (diattcls so by you dis- trained, and to ]iay the money arising from such sale to the clerk of the peace for the .^^aid county of . that he nniy pay and ajiply the sanu' as by law directed ; and if no s\udi distri'ss can ho found, then to certify the same unto me or any other justiceof the ])eace for the same county, that sn(di proceedings nuvy be had therein as to law apiiertain. (liven undi'r uw hand and st'al. this da\' of in lln' year . at , in the county aforesaid. O. K., [seal.] J. P., {Name of county.) Fou.Ms. 397 ]iER.—( Sec<(on .S!)8.) WARKANT OK COMMITJIENT b'OR WANT 01" DISTRESS IN THE LAST CASE. raiiiula, Proviiioc of County of :! To all or any ol' [\\v oonstal)k's and other [loace otKfors in tlio said I'oiinty of . : / ' Whereas (d'-r.. as in form (iH,)Q, to the asterisk * and then thus) : And wliereas. afterwards, on tlie di\y of , in the year aforesaid. I. the unch'rsigned, issued a warrant toalloranyof the peace ofiieers in the said eonnty of , eoinniandiiii.^ them, or any of them, to levy the said sum of , for eosts, i)y distress and saU' <>{' the iroods and chattels of I lie said A.H. ; And whereas it appears to me, as well l)y the return to the said warrant of distress of the ])eaee otlioer who was eharged with the execution of the same, as oiherwisi'. that the said ])eaee otHcer has made dili- ii'ent s('ai'<di for the yoods and (diatteis ot' the said A. 15. , l)Ut that no sntlicii'ut distress wlii'reon to ii'vy the said sum ahove mentioni'd could l)e found : Tlie.so are. therefore, to comMUind yon, the said jieace otlicers. or any one of you. to lake the said A, H., and him sately lo con\ey to t he eonimon gaol of I he said county of , at aforesaid, and there deliver him to the said keejier thereof, togi'ther with tiusprece]»t : And 1 do hereby command you. the said kee])er of the said common gaol, to receive the said A. B. into \«uii' euslody in the said common gaol, there to imprison him (and keep him at hard laliour) for tiie term of . unless the said sum tind all costs and charges oi' the saiil distress (and for the conuuitment and conveying of the said A. H. to the said common gaol, amounting to tlu' further sum of ), are sooner i)aid unto you, the said kei'per ; and for so doing this shall be yoursutli- oienl warrant. (iiveii under my hand and seal, this day of in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. (). K.. [seal.] J. P., (Name of county.) 3 IS PHAf'TICAI, (JiriiK TO MAGISTRATES. SSH.— (Section 1)02.) IJErriiN oi'foiivictioiis madi' liy iiu' (or us. ^.s the ciise may be), dur- ing tlio (juarlci' oudiiig .IS O S3 O « c a; s i5 ^ <« *; c.= •■-rl 41 ! i J c J . s cr. .Z ,: If not paid, why not, and jipneral ob- servations, if any. z. -^ {<: .-H H '51 ^ . J. S,. Convietiiig .lusticc or J. S. and O. Iv.. Convicting Justii-os (as the case may be.) ADDITIOXAL FOUMS. JIDUMENT OF AFKIIIJIANCE. ON AN APPKAL A(iAIN.ST A fONVICTION. Canada ^] Province of . > County of , J At (Describe the (^ourt appealed to) hold at on the day of ill the year of our Lord, 1811 , before J. W, of in tlie (cmmty) of aforesaid, (farmer) entered an appeal to and against a conviction under the ADDITIONAL FOHMS. 31>'J hand iind seal of J. 8., Esquire, one of llor Maji-sty's justices of tho peace, for the county (or district) afDrcsuid. dated and made the (hiy of IS!) , for (Here state the o(f'ence as in the convirtioh) , and hy which said conviction, lie tiie said ,1. S. did ad- judge that the said .F. ^V. sliould, for tiie said olfence, forl'eit the sum of together with for costs, and did order the said sums to be paid l)y the said J. W. on or before the and that ii\ default of payment on oi- lieforc tliat day, he tlie said .1. S. did \)y the said conviction, adjudge the said .1. W. to be im- prisoned in the common gaol at in the (county) afore- said for the space of unless the saiil sums should be sooner paid (and no on, giving the terms of the conviction.) Now, therefore, at the said court so holden as aforesaid, upon hearing the saiil apjieal, it is here okoeued and adjudueo,, i)y the said court tliat the said conviction be and the same is iiehehv, in all things, affirmed, and it is now, here, by the said court kubtiier ordered and adjudged that the said .F. W. be dealt with and pun- ished according to the said conviction, and also that he the said .1. W. do and shall i)ay to the said . the respondent in the said appeal, the sum of the amount of costs sus- tained by the said and b}' him incurred by reason of the said appeal, and now by the said court, here, adjudged to be paid to him by the said J. \V., according to the statute in such case niade and provided. writ of certiorari to a justice of the peace, to retlrn.a conviction. Canada, ") Victoria, by the Ch-ace of God, of the Province of , ;. United Kingdom of (Ireat Britain and Ire- County of , J land, (^UEEN, Defender of the Faith. To one of our justices, assigned to keep our ]ieace, in and for the county (or district) of and also to hear aiul determine divers offences in the said (county) com- mitted qreetino ; We, being willing for certain reasons that all and singular records of conviction of whatsoever trespasses and contempts against the 400 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. Criminal Code of Canada (^or against the Ibrm of a certain siatute, etc.), whoroof C. D is lief'oro yon convicted (as it is said) be sent by you before ns, do command yoi; that yon send nnder your hand and seal before the Jlonorable in days from (^or immediately on the receipt of this writ) all and singnhir the said records of conviction with all things touching the same,, as fully and perfectly as they have been made by you and now remain in your custody or power, together with this our writ, timt we may further cause to bo done therein what of right and according to law we shall see tit. In WITNESS witEKEop, WE liuvc causcd the seal of our court of to be hereunto aflixed at our (city) of this day of in the year of our reign , Clerk of the Crown. CERTIORARI — RECOGNIZANCE. Be it remembered, that, on the day of in the year of the reign of Our Sovereign Lady, Yictoeia. (etc.), (J. ir. of {merchant), and M, \V, of [gentleman) came before me. .1. S., Esquire, one of the keepers of the peace and justices of Our Lady, the (^ueen, in and for the (county) of and acknowledged to owe to Our Sov- ereign Lady the Queen the sum of to be levied upon their goods and chattels, lauds and tenements to Ilcr Majesty's use, upon condition that if C. D. shall prosecute with eli'ect, without any wilful or atfected delay, at his own i)roper costs and charges, a writ of certiorari issued out of the court of our said Lady the Queen, at to remove into the said court all and singular the records of conviction of whatsoever trespasses and contem])ts against the Criminal Code of Canada (or against the form of a certain statute efc), whereof the said C. D. is convicted before me the said J. S., and shall pay to the prosecutors vnthin next after the said record of conviction (or order) shall be confirmed in the said court, all their said full costs and ADDITIONAL FORMS. 401 chiircjos lo 1)0 taxed iiccording to the couvho of the said court, tlien this rocognizaiice to he void, or else to remain in full foree. Takkn and aoknowledged the day and ') Cr. II. year aforesaid, at hofore >■ mo, 3 M- ^• J. S. Note. — A hlank recognizanee is usually transmitted with tho writ of cer^'oran from the otiieo of the court issuing it. and when taken and acknowledged the recognizance is returneil with tha writ. If tho conviction he quashed, the recognizance is cancelled by being struck through, and is marked, in the margin "discharged, because the conviction is quashed." HETURN TO A WRIT OP CEKTIORARI BV A JUSTICE OK THE PEACE. (To be endorsed on the Certiorari.) The answer of one of ller Majesty's Justices assigned to keep tho peace in and for the county (or district) of Tho execution of this writ appears in tho schedule hereunto annexed. Justice of the peace. (The following to be written as a separate document.) I, one of the keepers of the peace of Our Lady the Queen, assigned to keep the peace within the said (county) of and to hear and determine divers ottences com- mitted in the said (county), by virtue of this writ of certiorari to me delivered, do, under ray seal, certify unto Her Majesty, in Her court of , the record of conviction of which mention is made in the said writ. 40li I'HArrlrAI, OITDK to AfAUrSTIlATKH. In -wirNRss wiierkhk. I llu-said luivo to (licsc preson'.s sot my wal. GiVBv iit in the siiid {county) this i\i\y of ill llu" vi'iir ol' our Lortlj'lS'.t {Name of convictimj ma<jisfrate.) [L. S.] NOTK. — 'Piu' cotivii'tioii is (() Ik- iiiiiioxrd to t lie writ and returned along with it, imt not tlie inforimition or depositions. WlUT OK llABKAS roUI'lS AH SUIt.l icr EN PIM. Canada. ~\ Victohia, lp_v tiie (iraee of (iod. of the Province of , >• Tnited Kin^chun of (ireat Mritain and County (or District) of } liehiiui, (i>i kkn. Oefender of the Faith. To the kooners of our common gaol for our county {or district) of or his deputy or dejmties, and to eacli of them (iRKKTtNU : \Vb co.\imani> Yoi; that you have hofore tlie IConorahle for at the Judges' Chanihers in the Court House in our (city) of immediately after the receipt of this writ, the hody of being committed and detained in our prison, under your custody (as it is said), together with the day and cause of the taking and detaining of the said by whatsoever name the said be called in the same, to undergo and receive all and singular such things as our said shall tiicn and there consider of him in that behalf, and that you have then and there this writ. In witness whereof, we have caused the seal of our Court of Queen's Heneh for Lower Canada (or, as the case may be) to be here unto affixed, at our (city) of this day of in the j*ear of our reign. Clerk of The Crown. TAHLB <)K NON-INl>I0TAni.E (>I-'KEN»"K8. 4i):i TAHLK OK XOX-INDICTAlVIil-: OKFKXOKS rXDKR TIFK CODK. With tlie exception of tiiose Hiwciully noted as beinj; triable by indii;tment fl8 well am suniinaril}', all the otl'ences in tliiH li.st are iioii-iiulictuble 512 501 513 307 332 333 265 Ai2 515 514 476 477 UFKKNOK. ANIMALS. Cruelly to Irjiincs to iiiiimiiU ( tieliiK ciittli.') (I) PrNISIIMKMT. I'eniilty .>i5(), nr 3 niontoH, with without ti. I. or both 10 or 3 nil or KecpiiiK cock pit (,,„, rl'ei.alty *lll "' 'h mm.ilw w 5 ; wulioMt li. r KilliiiK ilo(!s, birds, etc., with inluiit to .itcal the i<kiii, pluiii»Ke, ct) Killing or taking pigooiia . ASSAUr/r. Common assault (I) BANK NOTKS, ETC. Printing or ii-ing circulars or business cards in the like- ness of UATTLB. Refusing Pence Offlcoradmis eion to cattle car, oto Violating provisions as to con veyaticeof cattle , CO NAGE OFFBNCES. Manufacturing or import- ing uncurrent coiiper coin Uttering defaced coin. ] Uttering uncurrent copper ! coin ■... .... 1 J Peiialtv iS '0 or inonihs, (l)csid< lorleiturc , . . Penally $-JII (.!) or one luonili will, h. I. , 2nil otVcnce, three months Willi li, 1 I'enalty iilii (3). .. :i2() tine or 2 mos impri>onm'iit willi or nittiout li. 1 Fine, $100. or 3 months, or bulb. I'enalty S2i', or 3ii days Two Justices . One Justice . . Two Justice,". One Justice- do Penalty $100. IRURLRRKFURR Penalty $20 for every pound ; be- sides forteituro. . Penalty $10 Peimlly double the nomiiiil value ol the coin or eight days One Justice. . Two Justices One Justice. I.lMITATtON. 3 months ( Art. 551() 'S\x months (2) |3 months (Art. 551. •) Six months do do Two Justices. One Justice. . do do do 3 months (Art. 551<) 3 months (Art. 551() Six months. (2) do do (1) This otfence is, under Art. 501, indictable, when committed after a previous conviction. (2) Art. 841 limits (in all ofces not otherwise limited) the pro..ieculion of summary offences to SIX uoNTHS, except in the N. W. T., where the limitation in such cascSi when not other- wise provided for, is twklvb months. (3) In addition to the value of the animab bird, or article in nuesti< n. (4) Th B may be irosecutcd cither by indictment or sumumrily. 4U-1 PRACTICAL <a n>K TO MAGISTRATES. TABLE. — Continued. ART. 521 521 521 522 6'.'2 110 103 105 111 117 107 108 100 117 116 106 106 75 74 PU.NISHMKNT. CRIMINAL BREACHES OH CONTRACT. By individuiiKs (1^ By Municiiial Corporat'n.'i (1) l!v Kaihviiy Coiiipiiiiii'S. (1) Municipal Corporaticin or Company failinR to po<t up the provisions of Art. 521 Injuring copy of provisions when posted up DANGEROUS WEAPONS. Carrying any bowio knife or 1 other H'ensive weapon 1 I J Carrying any oft'ensive wea- | |)on publicly - j Carrying a pistol or air-gun r Carrying sheath knives . . . Concealing weapon in or about public worlis Having weapon when nr- ( rested I Having weapon with in- ! tent to injure any one. f I Pointing an.\ lire uriu at I any one. [ Possessing weapon ne.-ir pub- lic workt^ .... Selling anus-' in N. W. T Selling pi,>^tol, etc., to a minor under 16 Selling pi.-^tol, etc., without keeping rieord DE6EKTERS. Enticing militia or mounted Iiolico men to du.<crt Resisting warrant fordcsert'rs triahlkhkkurkI limitation. Fine $100 or3mo8. with or without h.l' Two Justices Penalty $U)o I Penally $10U . do do Penalty $20porday|0no Justice. Penalty $10 iOne Justice. Penalty S.'iii (not le>s than .•Jid). In! default of pay-i luent SO days wiih; or without hard' I labour .... Two Justices. l.*10Uue. In default I I of pa.Muent thirty days do l$i'") tine (not less than j; ), or one[ luiinth One Justice . . ,^tu (not loss than' $m. In def;uillj 'M days with or' without h I Two Justices. . Penally ,$100 (not le.«s than $Hi. .. ,Oiio Justice. • ■ .■*i01incnr ,S months with or without li. I Two Justices . Penalty $-Mt (not le.'^s than $ 0), or 6 months with or without, h. I d'i .■SlO.l (not less than .slO), or ,3i days with or without h.l do Penalty $1 each weapon >ne Justice- ■ • .ii2'i0 fine or 6 mos. or both I Two Justices.. $50 fine lOne Justice. .. $25 fine. i months with or without h. I — $80 penalty. i do do Two Justices. ■^i.t months- do do do do 1 month (Art. 551/) 1 month (Art. 551/) 1 month (Art. 551 /) I month (Alt. 551/) iis months 1 month ( Art. 5")1/) do do Six months do 1 month. (Art 551 f) do Six month* do (I) This may be prosecuted either by indictment or sumia:irily. TABLE OF NON-INDICTABLE OFFENCES, 405 TABLE. — Continued. ART' 200 199 200 203;' 203'' 177 352 523 119 118 OPKRNCE. DISGRDKRLY HOUSE. Wilfully preventing, ob- i structinK or delaying ofii- I cer entering ( (See Vagrancv.) FIRE ARMS. (See Daxukrous wkapons.) (lAMBLINO. Playin PUNISHMKNT TRIAHLK BKKORR Penalty SKX). and months, with or without b. 1 Two Justices. Six months. laying or looking on at p'ay Penalty $10" ; In in a gaming house ' default2 inonths'J ir;ir.,ii.. ^1. .i *.• -_ j_ / n u.. .r.inn „„ 1 ,' n IS Two Justices. Wilfully obstructing or de laying officer enteri I gaming house, etc (See Vagrancy.) ig or de- 1 tering a < 8 ( Penalty $100 and (i months wilh or without h. 1 Two Justices. Railway or Steauiboa t Com- 1 pany ntgleotingtopostup I Penalty $100; not in their conyevanoes the i- less than $20 iCivil Court(See Art. 929) provisions of Art. 203 1 against gambling J Railvvav or Steamboat olli- 1 cer neglecting to arrest ' persons Kiim')ling in their ', conveyances J INDECENT ACTS. Penalty .■iUKi: noK less than $20. ...One Justice. which thel !s'iO, In any place t public have access or in [ (1111/ place with intent to ' insult or oH'end any one.. J INDIAN GRAVES. 1 riPonalty .■^lOO, Stealing or Injuring things ! 3 montii". in ' fine, or sii niontlH, wilh or without h !.. 01 both I'wo Justices. or •?n<l oftiiiri, sit)) and! C months, h. 1 — One Jastice. .. INTIMIDATION. Fine, $10(1. or 3 By violence, picketing, lie. (1): month." with or I without h. 1 Two Justices. Of Wheat Dealers, Seamen, etc. (1) Fine. $lllO, or 3 months with or without h. I. INTOXICATlNt} LIQUORS. Conveying cm board H. M's.'SSO fine: 1 monlh; ships ! n ilcfiinlt ' ( \Ui ■■fl'inir: I'enaltV; I I $10 iind costs. Ill I lielault, 3months. I {Krfrii Oirllii r njTfti- ■i VI : samepemiliy; andimprisonm'nt in defauit.togeth- er with a lurtherl imprisonment of 6 months, do do Selling, near public works- LIMITATION. One Justice. do do do do do do do do do do (1) This may be prosecuted either by iiidiotuient or summarily. 400 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MACIISTRATKS. TAHLE. — Continued. ART. 382 382 485 510 607 491 507a 5)1 508 509 486 25S 457 93 94 95 OFKBNCK. PUNISHMENT. . TRIABLE BKFORE! LIMITATION. MARINE STORKS. | ! Buyinir murine stores from |ier.«oii.s uinlcr si.itoen Receivinu iniirine stores be- tore sunrise tr after sunset. MISCHIEF. j FiislenirR any vessel, ete., toi a buoy, etc, IiijurioK cultivated roots,)! etc ^( lujurint? fences, etc Ponnlty i5I. 2n(l; ".l>'' iici , $0 One Justice. Penalty, .-?5. 2n(l (tlt't ncr, j,~ Jo InjurinK gooils, ctcin rail- wiiy stnliiin. etc. tent to steal. 0.. in rail- i ..with in- < Injuring haibor bars Injuries not ollierwise pro vidcd for. In.iurinir trees, etc.. where- ) .>ioevcr (.'rowing, (1) ^ IrjuriuK vcKetahlc produc- tions in gardens, etc., (1). Reckl'sslys'tting tire to forest etc., on Crown doiuainj U) NE(!Lt(JENCE. Leaving holes in ice, or e\- | cnvHtions.elc., unguarded i OFFENSIVE E.APON.^^. (See Damjkrous wkai'ons.) PERSONATION. At a"y qualifying or competi- tive e.xamiiMitioii (.'>) Peinilty silO, or one iniintli Penally;i;5.('2) ornne inonih. 2nd ".il'i ii-\ •■r,:i moiillis h.l I l'eii:ilty,-i;2(l. (.')2:Hli iilt'i'Hfc, S U)oiith.-l h. I ! Penalty ^?20. (aliovel valueofinjuryjoi' 1 month (with or I with'th.l.orboth Penalt> .iioO Penalty 1*20 (2) . . Penally $25, (2) or| ■-' monttis. 2nd </- h llrr. 3 MIOIltllg I'einilty $20, (2) '2 luonihsin detault I Fine .S5<1. In de- fault, <i months. . Fine or imprison- ment, .vitli or without li. I., or both One year, or .iilOO tine PRIZE riiillTING. Challenge to prize fight ■ . Principal in a priie fight. Attending prize tight. $10f)Oliiie (not leas I than Slfii); or 61 , months (with or without h. I.) '-r I both itine year with or witlioiit h. I '$50(1 tine (not Icr than is'iO) or on* year (with or witfiout b. I. or both do do do do do do do do do do ilo do do ; months do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do (1) ThisotTouce is indictable i( cuinmilted after two previous oonvlotioni'. (2) Ihis is in atlditlon to the amount of injury done. (4) See note (4) at foot of p. .;07, opposite. Aft. 97 9tt 388 389 o87 173 316 391 390 TABLE OF NO.\-[NDICTAIU,E (IKKENCES. 407 TABLE. — Continued. PUNISllMKNT. TRIABLE nKfORKl LISIITATIOX. Finht on a quarrel . . IlischarRc, or S"'i i line One Justice. .. I \$i > ' ('Kll k'S'i til, I II Leiiviiic Ciiniiilii to attend ' | .S">ti), or ^'' niontli.'- II |>ri/,') iiKlit ]j witli or Wilhoul I h. 1 : do PUBLIC STOKES. i Six Not sntisfyiii!: Jnslioe of | lawl'iil i)os.<ii"^ion of 'Fine !?'-5 Uiil»wrully (IreilKing fori stores iFine siiS, or S in'.s.. I'lilinviully i)0>se.ssin(!: public | store.-^ nut c.xceeiiing the I value ot .ri.'n (1) •■■ Fine .'JlOli. ort)nio.<i.' withorwilhouili.l r UIJLIC WOHSUIP. I Di-turb.incc of S.S Mine. One montli I ill default iRECEIVINd. I months, do o do do One Justice . Six mopllis Cwo Justices., do Anytliine unlawfiillv oh \ t.'iineiltliesieiiliiiuiif which I i.'i imnishalile ."iiinniarily Siiine puiiisliiucnil ii.< for .-iteuliiiK it.' do Ncces.sari»8 from M»riiie or I'eserterlS) Penalty .^I2n;()in()s.- in defiiiill .. .! Iwo Justices Ueitiinentiil necessaries (^).. Penalty SH-. or Ki;i| mouths do (•'ee .MaKink St.iRK.s.) (SeeSKAMAN'.sl'KOfKR >.) (••^ee I'l Hl.Ki SrotlKs.) I ( See Wiii-.rK.) I do du do 342 330 311 340 SMA.MAN'.-^ PKOPKItTY. | Not satisfy initJu.«t ice of law-: fut posses 'ion of Fine Si.^ Heceivin.. by purc.n.se. } ''«X;::ef' "k:.,^;;' exchlln^'e, or pawn (,•»... ^ j.,„ , ^^'^j^' ,„,,,^- .STBALIN'). ! Cultivated ron,., etc.. in | ''"onfuumUi •"*-nd l.nd not being a garden, numtli . „n(l «fc I Fences, gates, etc 8 monthr 11 Pen ]\ oil ^ h. otfeiie h 1 PenKlty $20 ((i> ; "Jo olTencc, 3 month!' h. 1 (iar len plants, fruits, etc (7. Penalty $-0 (fi) or 1 month Not satisfying Justice of law iiil possessi'in of liee, etc Penally ^1" Hi) i Penalty $ •'i. ('!) 2i\ Trees, etc , worth 2'c at least I ott'eiice 8 months (1) (Seep 4(lti, opposite.) ( h. 1 . ■•■ (See I.Mil . tiRAVKs.) One Justice do do do do do do uionihs. du do do do du do (.->) This olfence is iiidielahle when the value 'S over 3>2i. (4) This is an indictable offence, but inii.V be dealt with by the magistrate, suiuiuirily when (lie eonseciuenccs have not been serious. (5) This is also indictable (6) This is in addition to the value of the article in i|Ucstion. (7) Thia ulVunoe, when cominiitcd after a previous cuuviotiun, is indlotuble. 408 PRACTrOAT, (HIDE To MACUSTRATES. TA « L K . — Continued. ART. Ill KKNTK. pi'XisnMKNr. TRIAULR BKPORK TRADE MARKS. 451 Falsely represent iiiKBoodcn* I iniii-utMctiirc'(I for ller.Mii- j jesty or :iiiy (jovernineiit. I'ciiiilly SH'O, ( Koiir Mioiitlis, or 460 Offences iipiiinst I lie iirovi- I .-'■lOd line: 2iiii of- .«ioiis ol I'lirl XXX 1 11 MS ] t'cMce. ti rims, or to Trade iMarks. (1, I ,S-Sl) fine, liesides 1 1 lorlciliiro 4i2 Unlawfully imiiorting gooiU' liiilije 10 I'drlViliire under IViialtv >;.'i'(i \ for- i I'artXxXIll kidire (.1 Koods . IVAOIIANCY. Inclu<ling publicly exposing 1 indecent .-liow, In Kuini-', loitoriiK, sweiiiinjr, beiiiK I drniik iinddisiirderly.ele. I ill strci'l. (Irl'aeirm siiri 8, lireiiUinpr w'lidows, etr., 2flT ) eoiuinon pruwitnti.in. r(i8 S iiiplit walkiiiu'.eu'.. kei'p- I.IJIITATIOX. Olio .Justice. . . Si.\ inoiitlis. do do .f")''(inc,or liiiioiillis' (Willi or wiiliiiui li- I.), or liolli .. Two .lu.-'ticc?. iiiK or biiii); inmate of or Creiiiientiiiir illMinli^r- ly liouses, liviiic liy KainiiiK ">■ criiiio or by the avails ot i rostitution i 496 381 WllIXK. ! Pni.illv $m, or (! PreveiiliiiBSavinn of. (1)... iimmlis with or will t li. 1 yecreling, or rcceivinj;, or keeping wreck. (1) do o do dr do do (1) Tbi8 in also inuictable. BECOGNIZANCES. ' ' ". 409 CllAI'TKIi XIV. (Part LI A. of the Codr.) < HKfMKiNIZ.VNCKS. !M(>. Uvinlor oi" A<'<'llM'd hy Nlirt't.y.— Any surdy lor iiiiy person oliiiri^cd witli any indictalik- oH'cMot' may. ujion jiHuhivil sliowinii- tlic ^-rounds llu'i'ffoi'. willi a ccrlitii'd copy ot'llu- vccnirni/.ance. olitain Irom ajudifoof a Superior Court or from u judge (d' a Counly Court Iiaving eriiuinal Jurisdietiou, or in tho pvovinci* of (Juidx'e from a district nia.n'istrate. an order in writina; under his liand. to render suidi jiersou to tlie common _ua(d of llie connl\' w iiere ilie olleiice is to lie tried. 2. 'I'lie suri'ties. nndt'i' su(di order, may arrest su( li person, and deliver lum. witli tlie ordei', to I lie gaoler named tlierein. w lio shall receive and impi'ison him in the said ,i;'a(d. and shall he (harti'eil with the keeping' of smdi ]iei'son until lie is dis(diarij,'ed i)y due (■(Uirse ot' law. (1 ) fill. Ilsiil al'lt'l* Ifi4'il4l«>l*. — The |ierson rendered niay apply to a Judi;H' of a Supi'i'ior ( 'ourt or in cases in which a Judgo of a ( "onnty ( 'oui't nniy admit to hail, to a Judge of a ( 'ounfy ( 'ourt. to he again admitted to liail. who may on examination allow or r(d'use t he .^anie. and nnike such order as to the nundier of tlu^ sureties and tlie annnint of the recognizance as he deems nu'ct. — wlnidi order shall ho dealt with in the same numner as the tirst order for hail, and so on as often as the easi* ri'ipiires. !>|t2. lliN4>iinr(>'«' of Ifi«>«*4»i;>-iiixaii4«4'. — On due proof of such render, and certiticate of tlu^ sheritl'. proved hy tim atlidavit of a suhserihing witness, that su(di pei'son has heen so rendered, a Judge of the Superior oi- County Ctiurt, as the case may he, shall ordi'r an entry of su(di render to he maile on the reeognizaiu-i' hy (1) See Form of Information of Snroty aj.'ainst a person bailed under Part XI, V of the Code, and Forms of Warrant and Commitment (hereon, at pp. L'47-li-l!», <nilc. 410 PRACTICAL (UIDK Ti> MAUIlSTKATKS. tlio oflic'ci' ill oliiirw tlieivof. wliicli sliall vacate tlu- rccosriiizanco. and may Ik' |)lva(l('(l or alU-gcd in discliarm' tluTcol'. l»i;$. KoikIoi* in t'oiirl.— Tlic suivtics nniy liriny- thu |R'i'S(>n cliarift-MJ as atorcsaid into the court at \vhi<di lie is hound to appear, during tlic sitting thereof', and tlu^n. hv leave of the court, render iiini in discharge of sucli recognizance at any time hefore trial, and ^such person shall he committed to gaol, tliere to remain until discharged hy due course of law ; hut suc!i court mav admit, su(di i)erson to hail for his ajipearance at any time it deems meet. Ill 1. NiirotioM not ]>iN<*liar;i;«'<l l»,v Arraign in cut Ol* Conviction. — The arraignment or conviction of any pei-soii charge(l and hound as aforesaid, shall not discharge the i-ecogniz- ance. hut the same shall he ellectual for his a|ipearance for trial or si'nteni'c. as t he casi' may he ; ncvi-rtheli-ss tlu' court may comniil su(di person to gaol upon his arraignment or ti'iai. oi' may rccpiiro ni'w Ol- additional sureties for his appearance for trial or sentence, as the ease may he. notwithstanding siudi recogni/.ance ; and such comniitment shall he a discharge of the sureties. !>■•>. Ki^lit <»f*Niir<'t^ to K«>n«l«>r n4»t AtiVctod. — Nothing ill the foregoing provisions shall limit or ri'strict any right which a surety now has of taking and rendering to custody any person (harged with any suidi ollence. and for whom hv issiu h surety. ^_ _ tllO. fiiitr.y of FincN cVc. on K<M'oimI aiiid Kc- «'OV«'P;i' Tii«'r«*of. — Unless otherwise provided, all tines, issues, amercements and fortV'itedrecognrzances, the disposal of which is. within the legislative authority of the I'arliament of Canada, set, imposed, lost or forfeited hefoiv any court of criminal jurisdiction shall, within twenty-one days afti'r the adjournment of such court he fairly entered and extracted on a roll by the clerk of tin' court, or in case of his death or ahseiice. by any other per.son. under the direction of the judge who presided at such court, which roll shall bo nunle in du])licate and signed by the clerk of the court, or in ease 1)1' his death or absence, by such judge. 2. If such court is a Superior Court of criminal jurisdiction one RECOr.NIZANCBS. , 411 ot'Huch rolls shall be filed with the clerk, prothonutiry, registrar or other proper officer — V • (a.) in the province ol' Ontario, of a division of the High Court of Justice ; > ^ (6.) in the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and British Columbia, of the Supreme Court of the province ; (c.) in the province of Prince luhvard Island, of the Sui)reme Court of .ludicature of that province ; (d.) in the province of Manitoba, of the Court of Queen's Bench of that province ; and («.) in the North-west Territories, of the Supreme Court of the said territories, — on or before the Hrst dav of the term next succeedins; the court by or before which .such tines (tr forfeitures were imposed or for- feited. 'A. If such court is a court of tieneral Sessions of the Peace, or a County Court, one of such rolls shall remain deposited in the office of the clerk of such court . 4. The other of such rolls shall, as soon as the sanie is ]>reparcd, l)c sent by the clerk of the court making the same, or in ca.se of his death or ab.sence. by such Judge as aforesaid, witii a writ ul' fieri facias and capias, according to the for.m TTT in schedule one to this Act, (1) to the sheriff of the county in and for which such court was holden ; and such writ shall be authority to the sheriff for pi'oceeding to the immediate levying and recovering of such tines, issues, amercements and forfeited recognizances, on the goods and chattels, lands and teiuMuents of the several persons named therein, or for taking into custody the bodies of such persons res- pectively, in case sufficient goods and chattels, lands or tenements cannot be fouiul, whereof the sums required can l»e made ; and every person so taki'U shall be lodged in the common gaol of the county, until satisfaction is made, or until the court into which such writ is returnable, upon cause shown by the jiarty, as hereiti- after mentioned, makes an onU-r in the case, and until such ordei- has been fully complied with. (I) For Form TTT, see p. 4 is, ponl. 27 412 PRACTICAL OriDE TO MAQISTllATES. 5. Tht' clerk of the court shall, at l\w foot of eacli roll made out an heroin directed, make and take an atfidavit in the following form, that is to say : *J, A. li. (describing his office), n\ake oath that this roll is truly and carefully made up and examined, and that all tines, issues, amenHmients, recognizances and forfeitures wliich were set, lost, imposed or forfeited, at or by the court therein mentioned, and whicii. in righr and due course of law, ought to be levied and paid, are, to the best t)f m}' knowledge and understanding, inserted in the said roll ; and that in the said roll are also contained and expressed all such tines as have been paid to or received by me, either in court or otherwise, without any wilful discharge, omission, misnomer or defect whatsoever. So help me God ; " Which oath any justice of the peace for the county is hei-eby authorized to administer, 917. Officer to Prepare liiiitN ot'PerNoiiN under KeeojriiiKaiiee iiiukiii}}; Default. — If an}- person bound by recognizance for his a{)pearance (or for whose ap}»earance any other person has become so bound) to prosecute or give evidence on the trial of any indictable ott'ence, or to answer for any common assault, or to articles of the peace, makes default, the otticer of the court by whom the estreats are made out. shall prepai'e a list in writing, specifying the name of everj^ person so making default, and the nature of the ott'ence in respect of which such person, or his surety, was so bound, together with the residence, trade, ])ro- fession or calling of every such person and surety, — and shall, in such list, distinguish the principals from the sureties, and shall state the cause, if known, wh}' each such person did not appear, and whether, by reason of the non-appearance of such person, the ends of justice have been defeated or delayed. OlS. Proceed in)r on Forreited Kecog;nixance not to be taken except hy Order of Jud|^e, 4kv, — Every such officer shall, before any such recognizance is estreated, lay such list before the judge or one of the judges who presided at the court, or if such court was not presided over by a judge, before two justices of the peace who attended at such court, and such RKOiHiNIZANCES. 413 judge 111' Justices shall oxiiiniiio suc-h list, ainl iiuiko .such order touching the estreating or putting in process any such recognizance as appears just, subject, in tiie jtrovince of (Quebec, to tlie ijrovisions hereinafter contained ; and no officer of any such court shall e.streut or put in process any such recognizance without the written order of the judge or justices of the peace l)ofore whom respectively such list iuis been laid. 1>lfl. Ko<*o){iiixiiii(*o iircfl not be .Kstrcated in (Vrtlliii 4'aNl'N. — Kxcei»t in the ca.ses of persons bound by recognizance for their apiiearance, or for whose appearance any other per.son has become bound to pi"o.secute or give evidence on the trial of an}' indictable otfence. or to answer for any common a.ssault. or to articles of the ])eace, in ever}' case of default whereby u recognizance becomes forfeited, if the cause of absence is made known to the court in which the person was bound to appear, the court, on consideration of such cause, and considering also, whether, by the non-a]ipearance of such person the ends of Justice have l)een defeated or delayed, may forbear to order the recogniz- ance to be esti-eated : and, with respect to all recognizances es- treated, if it appears to the satisfaction of the judge who presided at such court that the absence of any person for whose appearance any recognizaiue was entered into, was owing to circumstances which ren<lered such absence justitiable. such judge may make an order directing that the sum forfeited upon such estreated recog- nizance shall not be levied. 2. The clerk of the court shall, for such purpose, before sending to the sheriff any roll, with a writ of fieri facias and capias, as directed by section 91G, submit the same to the judge who presided at the court, and such judge may make a minute on the said roll and writ of any such ft)rfeited recognizances and tines as he thinks fit to direct iu)t to be levied ; and the sherilf shall observe the direction in such minute wi-itten upoi\ such roll and writ, or endorsed thereon, and shall forbear accordingly to levy any such forfeited recognizance or tine, »30. Hnlv of* liiindN hy Nlierift Under Kstreated Keeo^nizanc'e. — If upon any writ issued under section 916, the sheritt' takes lai|ds or tenements in exeution, he shall advertise 414 PRACTICAL (JUIDE TO MAOtSTRATES. the same in like maiuu'r us he is required to do before the sale of lands in exeeution in other oases ; and no sale shall take plaee in less than twelve months from the time the writ came to the hands of the shi'ritf. 9S1. l>iM<*liar)i;«' Iroiii CiiNtod;)' on 4iiiviii|>; Hv^ vuriiym — If an\- i)erson on whose goods and ehattels a sheritf, bailiff or other ottieer is authorized to levy any sueh forfeited lecog- nizance, gives security to the said sheritf or other oltteer for his ai»])eaninee at the return day mentioned in the writ, in the court into which such writ is returnable, then and there to abide the decisicm of such court, and also to ])ay such forfeited recognizance, or sum of money to be jDaid in lieu or satisfaction thereof, together with all such expenses as are adjudged and ordered by the court, such sheriff or otHcer shall discharge such person out of custod} and if such person does not appear in pursuance of his under- taking, the court may forthwith issue a writ of fieri facias and capias against such person and the surety or sureties of the person so bound as aforesaid, 1I2S* UiNvliarj^e of ForlVitod K('c*o^;iiixuiice. — The court into which any wi-it of fieri facias and capias, issued under the provisions of this part, is returnable may inquire into the circumstances of the case, and may in its iliscretion order the discharge of the whole of the forfeited recognizance, or sum of money ])aid or to be paid in lieu or satisfaction thereof, and make such order thereon as to siu-h court aj)pears just ; and such order shall accordingly be a discharge to tlie sheritf, or to the jnirty. according to the circumstiinces of the case, »a:i. Kotiirn of Writ by Nli4>rift The sheritt to whom any writ is directed under this Act shall return the same on the ilay on which the same is made n'turnable, and shall state, on the back of the roll attached to such writ, what has been done in the execution thereof; and such return shall be filetl in the court into which such return is made, < 924. Koll uikI Kt'tiirii to be TraiiNiiiittcd to Minister of Finance. — A copy of such roll and leturn, certitied by the clerk of the court into which such return is made, ' RB0OONIZANCB8. — QUEBEC. 415 sliull be forthwith transniilted to tho Minister of Finance and lloeeiver-deneral, with a minute thereon of any of the Hiuns tliere- in mentioned which have been remitted ijy order of the court, in wliole or in part, or directed to be forborne, under the authority of section 1)19. • . 935. Appropriation of .Tloiicy.*! €'Oil<>ott>(i by Niierilt. — Tiie sheritf or other officer siiall, witliout delay, i)ay over all moneys collected under the pro'.isions of this part In him to the Minister of Finance and UeceiviM'-General, or other person entitled to receive the same. tl2tt. €|lH'i»ef.— The provisions of sictions !>16, !H!t to 924, both inclusive, shall not apply to tho province of Quebec, and the following provisions shall apply to that province only : i ; 2. Whenever default is nuide in the condition of an}' recogniz- ance lawfully entered into or taken in any criminal case, proceed- ing, or matter, in the province ok Quebec, within the legislative authority of the Parliament of Canada, so that the penal sum tlierein mentioned becomes forfeited and due to the Crown, such recognizance shall thereuj)on be estreated or withdrawn from any ' record or proceeding in which it then is, or, — where the recogniz- ance has been entered into orally in open court — a certiticate or minute of such recognizance, under the seal of the court, shall be made from the records of such court ; (a.) Such recognizance, certiticate or minute, as the case may be, shall be transmitted by the court, recorder, justice of the peace, magistrate or other functionary before whom the cognizor, or the principal cognizor, where there is a surety or sureties, was bound to appear, or to do that, by his default to do which the condition of the recognizance is broken, to the Superior Court in the district in which the place where such default was made is included for civil purposes, with the certificate of the court, recorder, justice of tho peace, magistrate or other functionary as aforesaid, of the breach of the condition of such recognizance, of which and of the forfeiture to tho Crown of the penal sum therein mentioned, such certificate shall bo conclusive evidence ; (6.) The date of the receipt of such recognizance or minute and certificate by the prothonotary of the said court shall be endorsed 416 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES thereon by him, and lie slmll enter judgment in favour of tho Crown agaiuHt the (M)gnizor for the penal Hum mentioned in wuch reeognizanee, and exeeution may issue therefor after the same delay as in other eases, which shall he reckoned from tho time when the judgment is entered by tho ])rothonotary of the said court ; (c.) Such execution shall issue upon fiat or prcecipe of the Attornoy-General, or of any person thereunto authorized in writing by him ; and the Crown shall be entitled to tho costs of execution and to costs on all ])roeeedings in the case subsequent to exeeution, and to such costs, in the discretion of the court, for the entry of the judgment, as are fixed by any tariff. (d.) The cogiiizor shall be liable to coercive imprisonment for the payment of the judgment and costs. (e.) When sutHcient goods and chattels, lands and tenements cannot bej'ound to satisfy the judgment against a cogiiizorand the same is certified in the return to the writ of execution or appears by the report of distribution, a warrant of commitment addressed to the sheriff of ibe district may issue upon the fiat or pran'ipe of the Attoi'ney-General, or of any ])erson thereto authorized in writ- ing by him, and such wai'rant shall be authority to the shoritf to take into custody the body of the cognizor so in default and to lodge him in the common gaol of the district until satisfaction is made, or until the court which issued such warrant, upon cause shown as hereinafter mentioned, makes an f)rder in the case and such order has been fully complied with. f/.) Such warrant shall be returned l)y the sheriff on the day on which it is made returnable and the sheritt' shall state in his retuni what has been done in execution thereof. {g.) On petition of the cognizor, of which notice shall be given to tho clerk of the Crown of the district, the court may inquire into the circumstances of the case and may in its discretion order the discharge of the amount for which ho is liable or make such order with respect thereto and to his imprisonment as may appear just, and such order shall be carried out by the sheriff. (1) (1) As amended and added to by 57-58 Vic, c. 57, sect 1. RECOONI/iANCES. — QUBBEC. 417 3. Nothing? in this Hoctioii contained shall prevent tlie recovery of the Huin forfeited by tlie breach of any recogni74ince from being recovered by suit in the manner provided by law, whenever the Hame cannot, for any reason, bo recovered in the manner provided in this Hection ; (a.) Tn Huch cane the suni forfeilcd by tlie non-perfoi-mance of the conditions of such recognizance shall be recoverable, with costs, by action in any coui't having jurisdiction in civil cases to the amount, at the suit of the Attorney-General of Canada or of Quebec, or other person or otHcer authorized to sue for the Crown ; and in any such action it shall be held that the jiersoii suing for the Crown is duly empowered so to do, and that the conditions of the recognizance were not ]terf()rmed, and that the sum therein mentioned is, therefore, due to the Crown, uidess the defendant j)roves the contrary. (6.) The cognizor for the recovery of the Judgment in any such action shall be liable to coercive imiirisonment in the same manner as a surety is in the case of judicial suretyship in civil matters. (1) 4. In this section, unless the context otherwise requires, the expression "cognizor" includes any number of cognizors in the same recognizance, whether as principals or sureties. 5. When a person has been arrestetl in any district for an ott'enco committed within the limits of the province of Quebec, and a jus- tice of the j)eace has taken recognizances from the witnesses heard before him or another justice of the peaces for their appearance at the next session or term of the court of competent criminal juris- diction, before which such person is to undergo his trial, there to testify and give evidence on such trial, and such recognizances have been transmitted to the oifice of the clerk of such court, the said court may j)roceeil on the said recognizances in the same manner as if they had been taken in the district in which such court is held. (1) As amended and added to by 57-68 Vic. c. 57, sec 1. 418 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. FORM UNDER PART LTX, OF THE CODE. TTT.— {Section inc>.) V * WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS. Vii'torin. hy the Grace To the sltevirtof , Cireeting : You are hereby commanded to levy of the goods and chattels, 'unds and tenements, of each of the persons mentioned in the roll oi- ext.'act to this writ annexed, all and singular the debts and suras of money upon them severally imposed and charged, as there- in is speeitiod ; and if any of the said several debts cannot be levied ' by reason that no goods or chattels, lands or tenements can be found belonging to the said persons, respectively, then and in all sucIj cases, that you take the bodies of such jiersons, and keep them safely in the gaol of your county, there to abide the judg- ment of our court {as the case may be) upon any matter to be shown by them, respectively, or othei-wise to remain in your cus- tody as aforesaid, until such debt is satisfied unless any of such persons respectively gives sufficient security for his appearance at the said court, on the return day hereof, for which you will be held answerable ; and what you do in the premises make appear before us in our court (as the case may be) on the day of next, and have then and there this writ. Witness, etc., G. H., clerk (as the cask may be). ARTICLES OP THE PEACE. 419 CllAl'TlvK XV. {Part Ly^V., of the Code.) SuRETfES FOR KEEinNO THE PEACE. 1>5H. PorNOiiM C*oiivi<*t4Ml may l>«' Fined and Bound Ov«'r to Keep tlie Peaee. — (^As amended by 5G Vic. c. 32.) — Kvory court of criminal jurisdiction and every magis- trate under Part LV of the Code, l)efore wliom any person shall be convicted of an otfence and shall not be sentenced to death, shall have power, in addition to any sentence imposed upon such per- son, to require him forthwith to enter into his own recognizan- ces, or to give security to keep the peace, and be of good beha- viour, for any term not exceeding two years, and that such person in default shall be imprisoned for not more than one year after the expiry of his imprisonment under his sentence, or until such recognizances are sooner entered into or such security sooner given, and any person convicted of an indictable offence, punish- able with imprisonment for five yeers or less, may be fined in ad- dition to or in lieu of any punishment otherwise authorized, in which case the sentence may direct that, in default of payment of his fine, the pei-son so convicted shall be imprisoned until such fine is paid, or for a jjcriod not exceeding five ykars, to commence at the end of the term of imprisonment awarded by the sentence, or forthwith, as the case may require. 05tt. Kecognizanee to Keep the Peace.— When- ever any person is charged before a justice with an offence triable under Part LVIII., which, in tne opinion of such justice, is directly against the peace, and the justice, after hearing the case, is satis- fied of the guilt of the accused, and that the offence was committed under circumstances which render it probable that the person con- victed will be again guilty of the same or some othei- offence against the peace unless ho is bound over to good behaviour, such justice may, in addition to, or in lieu of, any other sentence which may be imposed upon the accused, require him forthwith to enter into his own i-ecognizances, or to give security to keep the peace 420 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. and be of good behaviour for any term not exceeding twelve months. 2. Upon complaint by or on behalf of any person thai, on account of threats made by some other person or on any other account, he, the complainant, is afraid that such other person will do him, his wife or child sotne personal injury, or will burn or set tire to his property, the justice, before whom such complaint is made may, if he is satisfied that the comjilainant has reasonable grounds for his fears, require such other person to enter into his own recogniz- nizances, or to give security, to keep the peace, and to be of good behaviour, for a term not exceeding twelve months. 3. The provisions of Part LVIII. shall apply so far as the same are ai>plical)le to proceedings under this section, and the com- plainant and defendant and witnesses may be called and examined, and cross-examined, and the comjdainant and defendant shall be subject to costs as in the case of any other complaini. 4. If any person so required to enter into his own recognizances or give security as aforesaid, refuses or neglects so to do, the same or any other justice may order him to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding twelve months. 5. The forms WWW, XXX and YYY, with such variations and additions as the circumstances may require, may be used in pro- ceedings under this section. (1) The application for sureties to keep the peace, — on account of threats. — should be made soon after the cause of fear, upon which it is based, has arisen (2) ,and the threat complained of should not be merely a conditional or contingent one, to be executed in case only of the complainant doing something which he has no right to do, or which it is not necessary for him to do in the course of his business. But if it is so necessary then a threat so made may be a proper foundation for the application for sureties. (3) The Magistrate will form his own opinion and satisfy himself as to whether or not the facts stated amount in reality to a threat of (1) For forms WWW, XXX and YYY, see pp. 422-424, po««. (2) Dennis v. Lane, « Mod., 131. (3) K. V, Mallinsen, 20 L. J. M. C, 33. ARTICLES OF THE PEACE. 421 personal violence. It is not enough that the complainant sweai's to an apprehension of personal violence. lie should disclose facts which show that he has i-easonable grounds for his fears and that the defendant's conduct is such as would make that impression upon the mind of any impartial and dispassionate man. If the Magistrate is satistied ujton this subject, he issues either a summons or a warrant to bring the defendant l)efore him. And the defendant, upon his a)ipearance, is asked if he has any cause to shew why he should not enter into his recognizance and give the required sureties to keep the peace. It has been held that, as the binding over to keep the peace, on account of threats, is in reality a means of preventing an appre- hended breach of the peace rather than a punishment (1), the de- fendant should not be allowed to adduce evidence to deny having used the alleged threats (2), and that, in case of the allegations of the complaint being untrue, his remedy should be by action or by indictment for perjury, and that he should be merely allowed, — either by cross-examination or by witnesses of his own. — to explain any ambiguous portions of the complaint, or to show that his words or acts do not fairly raise the inference sought to be raised from them, and do not really contain any threat creating' fear of bodily injury (3) ; or that the complaint is made from malice or ill-will. (4) The third paragraph of the above Article, 959, expressly pro- vides, however, that the provisions of PartLVIIl, — (relating to summary convictions), — shall apply, so far as applicable, to proceed- ings there under, and that the complainant and defendant and witnesses may be called and examined and cross-examined. Where, on an a|>plication for sureties to keep the peace, proof is made not only of the alleged threats, but also of the commission of an assault, not alleged, the justice cannot convict the defendant of the assault, but can only order the giving of sureties as applied for. (5) (1) Lort v. Hutton, 46 L. J. M. C, 95. (2) Lord Vane's Case, 2 Str. 1202; R. v. Dolierty, 13 East, 171 ; R. v. Dunn, 12 A. &E.,699. (3) R. v. Bringloe, 13 East, 174, n; R. v. Tregarthen, 5 B. & Ad., 078. (4) R. v. Parnell, 2 Burr. 806. (5) R. V. Deny, 20 L. J. M. C, 180. 422 PRACTICAL GLIDE TO MAOISTKATES. !N(0. Procec<liiig;N for Wot Fiii«liii)>^ NiiretieN to Ke«'p the Peaoo. — Whencvei- any pi'i-son, who haw been ro- qiiirod to outer into a recoguizaiu-e with siiroties to keep the peace and he of ajood hohaviour, has, on aceount of his default therein, reniainetl inii)risoned for two weel<s, thes lieritf, gaoler, or warden shall give notice, in writing, of the facts to a judge of a Superior Court, or to a judge of the County Court of the county or district in which such gaol or prison is situate, and, in the cities of Montreal and Quebec, to a judge of the Sessions of the Peace for the district, or. in the North-West Teri-itories, to a stipendiary magistrate — and such judge or magistrate nuiy order the discharge of such person, thereupon, or at a subsequent time, upon notice to the complainant or otherwise, or may make such other order as he sees fit. respecting the number of sureties, the sum in which they are to be bound, and the length of time for which such person may be bound. ~ > ' : ; FORMS UNDKR PART LXV. OF THE CODE. W\y\\.— {Section 951K) COMPLAINT, BV THK PARTY THREATENED, FOR SURETIES FOR THE PEACE. Canada, Province of County of '] The information (or complaint) of C. !»., of • . in the said county of , (labourer), (if preferred by an attorney or agent, say — by I). E., his duly authorized agent [or attorney], in this behalf,) taken upon oath, before me, the undersigned, a justice of the peace in and for the said county of , at , in the said county of , this day of , in the year , who says that A. B., of , in the said county, did, on the day of , (instant or last past), threaten the said C. D. in the words or lo the effect following, that is to say : (set them out, with the circumstances FORMS. 42H under which they were used) ; and tlial from the above and other threats nsed by the said A. H. towards the said 0. D., he, the said C. D., is afraid that the said A. B. will do him some bodily injury, and therefore prays that the said A. B. may be required to find suffieieiit sureties to keep tiie peace and be of good behaviour toward him, the said ('. I). ; and the said (). D. alsp saj's that he does not make this complaint against nor require such sureties from the said A. B. from any malice or ill-will, but merely for the preservation of his p<M'son from injury. XXX.— (Section !»5t>.) >. : POaM OF RF.OOQNIZANCE FOR THE SESSIONS. :! Canada, Province of (Jounty of Be it remembered that on the day of in the year , A. B., of , (labourer), L. M. of , (grocer), and N. O. of (butchtr), jiersonally came before (ms) the undersigned, (two) justices of the ])eace for the county of , and severally acknow- ledged themselves to owe to our Lady the Queen the several sums following, that is to say ; the said A. B. the sum of , and the said L. M. and N. O. the sum of . each, of good and lawful money of Canada, to be made and levied of their goods and chattels, lands and tenements, respectively, to the use of our said Lady the (^ueen, her heirs and successors, if he, the said A. B., fails in the condition endorsed (or hereunder written). Taken and acknowledged the day and year tii-st above mentioned, at before us. J. S. J.T. J. P.'s, (Kame of county) The condition of th. within (or above) written recognizance is such that if the within bound A. B. (of, &c.), * apjiears at the next Court of General Sessions of the Peace, (or other court discharg- 4-4 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAUISTKATKS. ing the functions of the Court of (leneral Sessions), to bo lioldon in and tor tho siiid county of . to do and receive what is then and there enjoined liini by tlie court, and in the meantime '■'■'• Icoejis the peace and is of good behaviour towards Ifer Majesty and i\er liege people, and specially towards C. D. (of. iVcc). for the term of now next cnsuiiiii;. then the said recognizance to lie void, otherwise to stand in full force and virtue. \YY.— (Section [)5H.) KOIIM OP COM.MITMENT I.\ OEFAULT OP SURETIES. Canada, ^ Province of , |- County of , j To all or any of the other |>eace ofHcers in the county of , and to the keeper of the common gaol of the said county, at , in the said county. Whereas on the daj^ of (instant), complaint on oath was made before the undersigned (or J. L., Esquire), a jus- tice of the ])eace in and for the .said county of , by C. D., of , in the said county, (labourer), that A. B., of, (&c.), on the day of , at aforesaid, did threaten (i&c, follow to the end of complaint, as inform above, in the past tense, then) : And where- as the said A. B. was this day brougiit and appeared before me, the said justice {or J. L., Ksquire. a justice of the peace in and for the said county of ), to answer unto the said complaint ; and having been required by me to enter into his own iccognizance in the supi of , with two sufficient sureties in the sum of each, * as well for his appearance at the next (leneral Sessions of the peace (or other court discharging the functions of the Court of General Sessions, or as the cane may be), to be held in and for the said county of , to do what The words between the asterisks ** lobe used only where the principal is required to appear at the sessions or such other court. FORMS. 425 \ shiill t>o then and there enjoined him b}' the court, as also in tlic meantinio * to keep the peace and be of good behaviour towards Her Majesty and her liege people, and especially towards the said (!. D.. has refused and neglected, and still refuses and neglects, to find such sureties : These are. therefore, to command you, and each of you, to take the said A. B., and him safelj^ to convey to the (common gaol) at aforesaid, and there to deliver him to the ket^per thereof, together with this precept : And I do hereby command you. the said keeper of the said (common gaol), to receive the said A. B. into your custody in the said (ct)mmon gaol), there to imprison him until the said next (ieneral Sessions of the peace {or the next term or sitting of the said court dischargin<j the functions of the Court of General Sessions, as the case may be), unless he, in the meantime, finds sufficient sureties as well for his appearance at the said Sessions (or court) as in the meantime to keep the peace as aforesaid. Given under my hand and seal, this day of , in the year , at , in the county aforesaid. J. S., [seal.] J. P. (Naine of county.) The words between tlie asterisks ^^ to be used when the recognizanoe is to be so conditioned- / FOURTH DIVISION ALPHABETICAL SYNOPSLS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW OF CANADA. Abandonment. ■ ■ " ■ / .■ Abaiidoniii}; C'hilfl Under Two If earn 01«l.— Jt is an indiotabk' ortence, piiiiishablc by throe years imprisonment, to unlawlully abandon or expose any ehild nnder two years old, whereby its life is ent':vngered, or its healtli permanently injured. The words ■• abandon " and •' expose "' ineludo a wilful omission to take charge of the child, on the ])art of the person legally bound to take charge of it, and any mode of dealing with it calcu- lated to leave it ex])osed to risk without protection. (Code, Art. lilO.) Two defendants were chargeil with having abandoned and ex- posed a weakly bastard child, live weeks old, and with having thereby endangered its life. The defendants (one being the child's mother) wrapped the child in a shawl and packed it in a hamper, with sliavings and wool, and left it at the railway station at M., the hamper hiding addi-essed to the child's father at G., the father having told the mother, before the child's birth, that, if she sent it t(j him, he would keej) it. The mother j)aid the carriage of the hamper and told the rai4way clerk to be careful of it and to send it by the next train, due in ten minutes. Upon the address were the words, " With cark — Tti be delivered im.meuiatelv. ' The ham|)er arrived at its aildress in (i. in an Jiour from being de- si)atched from M., and, on being opened, the child was alive, but died three weeks afterwards, from causes not attributable to the ABDIf'TKlN. 427 prisoners. Held. :iii aliiiiKlomncnt aiid oxpoHurc •ii(l;iii;;'t'riMir tlio c^liild's life ; and thi' prisoners were found i^uiity. (1) A woman, living apart from lier hushand. left tlu'ir eliild out- side tiie father's door, teiiini!; him slie liad done so. Tiie fatiier i<nowinifly allowed tlie ehild to remain outside from 7 p.m. till 1 a.m., when it was found, cold and stiff. \\\ a eonslalile. who re- moved it. Held, that, although the fathei- had not tlu' aetual possession of the (dnld. yet. as lie was legally hound to ])rovi(le for it, his allowing it to remain wliere he did was an ahandonment and exposure whertd)y the child's life was endangered. (2) ABIJUCTION. AlxliK'tion of any Woman. — Every one is guilty of an indietalde offence and liahle to fourteen years' imprisonment who, with intent to marry or carnally know any woman, whether married or iu)l, or with intent to cause her to be married to or carnally known by any other ])erson, takes away or detains any woman of any age against her will. (Code, "Art. 281.) Ah<lli<*tiou of an llt'ir«'s».— Every one is guilty of an indictahle offence and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment who, with intent to marry or carnally know any woman, or with intent to cause her to be married or carnally known by any ])erson — (a.) from motives of lucre takes away or detains against her will any such woman of any age having an interest, legal or equitable^ |)resent or future, absolute, conditional or contingent, in any real or personal estate, or who is a jiresumptive heiress or co-heiress or presumptive next of kin to any one having such interest ; or (b.) fraudulently allures, takes away or detains any such wonum, being under twenty-one years, out of the possession and against the will of her father or mother, or other jierson having the lawful care or charge of her, with intent to nuirry or carnally know her. 2. Every one convicted of any ott'cnce detined in this section can take no estate or interest, legal or equitable, in any real or (1) R. V. Falkinghain, L. R., 1 C. C. R., 222; 39 L. J. (M. C.) 47. (2) R. V. 'White, 1 C. C. R. 311 ; 40 L. J. (M. C.) 134. 28 428 PRACTICAL (lUIDK TO MAGISTRATES. porsoiiiil i)r()|ii'rty of such woniiiii. or in wliich alio lias any inter- est, or whicli conius to lior as such lu'hvss. co-hoiross or noxt of kin ; and if any such inurriago takes ])hico such propcrtj' shall, upon such conviction, lie settled in such numner as any court of com])etcnt Jurisdiction, ujjou any information at tlic instanci' of the Attorney-(iencra!, appoints. (Code, Art. 282.) li' the wonuin lie taken away, in the first iustaiu'c. with her con- sent, hut afterwards refu.scs to continue with the otl'ender. and, if, then, he still Jetain her, against her will, he is punishahle. If. after having heen. at first forcibly taken uwaj', the woman he afterwards married, or defiled, hy or at the instance of her ahductor. with her own consent, the offence will still he committed within the terms of the ahove enactment. (1) Even if she ho taken away and married with her own consent, yet, if this ho effected hy means of fraud, it will still he within the law ; for, she cannot, whilst under the influence of fraud, be considered a free a^ent. (2) There need not he an actual nuirriage or a defilement to consti- tute the otlenco. The taking aicay or the detaining against the wonuui's will, or, in the case of a minor heiress. X\w fraudulent allu- rement or the taking or detaining against the will of the jiarent or guardian, coupled, in either case, with the intent to marry or car- nally know, or, liavo her married or carnally known, constitute the offence ; and upon an indictment for fraudulent allurement, etc., it is not necessary to sliow that the accused knew that the woman was an heiress, or interested in any projierty ; (3) al- though in the case of a charge under clause (a) of Article 282 it might be necessary, in order to establish that the abduction was from motives of lucre, to prove the accused's knowledge or belief that the woman had an interest in property. Uula^vfliil Taking cf a Oirl Uiuler Silxteen.— Every one is guilty of an indictable otfenco and liable to five years' imprisonment who unlawfully takes or causes to be taken (1) FuUwood's Case, Cro. Car. 488; Swen don's Case, 5 St. Tr. 450; 1 Hale 660. (2) R. V. Perry, 1 Hawk, c. 41, s. 13 ; 1 Russ. Cr. 710. (3) R. V. Kaylor, 1 Dor. Q,B. 364 ; Bur. Dig. 267. AHDUOTION. 429 any unmnrried (jirt. U'iug under (lie aj^c of sixteen years, ^<nii of the possession and ag'ainst rlic will of lirr fatlu-r oi- niotluT, or othor poi'son iia\iny llic lawful i^arc oi- cliargt' of lie r. 2. It is inunatorial whotlu'r tlu! girl is taken witli lu-r own con- sent or at iier own suggi'slion oi* not. H. It is immaterial wlietlufr or not the ott'ender believed the gii'l to Le of or above the ag*' of sixteen, (("ode, Art. 2m;1) The gist of the otVenee is the taking of the girl out of the possession of her parents or any one having legal eure and charge of her. Where the girl — without jiersuasion or indueenu-nt on the jmrt of the defendanl — leaves her father, has got i'airly away from home, and then goes to the defendant, his not .sending her l)aek to her father's possession is no infraction of this article; for it does not say that he shall restore her. but that he shall not take her away. (1) Merely cohabiting with a girl after she has left her father is not an ott'ence within this Article. (2) Jiut a girl's temporary ab.seneo from home will not interrupt the father's possession. And, if while living with her father, a girl leaves the house for a mere temporary purpose, intending to return honn;, she is considered to be still in her father's possession, and if while .so out of her father's house, temporarilj-. the defendant induces her to run away with him, he is guilty of the above ott'ence. (H) A girl em[)lo3ed as a barmaid away from her father's home is under the lawful charge of her employer and, therefore, an in- dictment will not lie for taking her out of her fatlier's pcssesaion. A., a girl under sixteen, who, with her father's consent, was under the care of H., her uncle, was allowed, b}' B., to dine at tlie house of (".. the husband of B's sister. C. took A. for a drive and stayed over night with her. and debauched her, at a hotel. The next day he left her at Hs. Held, that B. had the lawful care of A., and that she was unla\^fully taken out of his possession by C. (6) (1) K. v. Olifier, 10 Cox, 402. (2) R. V. Miller, 13 Cox, 179. (3) K. v. M) cock, 12 Cox, 28. (4) R. V. Heukers, 16 Cox, 257. (5) R. V. Mondelet, 21 li. G J. 154. 430 PRACTirAL OI'IPE Tt» MAGISTRATES. It has boon held, and is so dochirod by tho second clause of the above Article, that the girl's consent is immaterial ; and the taking need not be by force actual or constructive ; nor is it any legal excuse that there is an absence of any corrupt motive, or that the defendant made use of no other means than the common bland- ishments of a lover, to induce the girl to I'lopc with and marry him. (1) And so, where the defendant went in the night to the girl's father's house, placed a ladder against her window, and held it while she descended and she elopi-d with him, this was held a "taking out of the jjossession of her father.' although the girl her- self had proposed the \Anu to the defendant. (2) Where the girl was pcrsuadetl by defendant to go away with him from her fathers house, without her father's consent, and she accordingly left home by a pre-arrangement between them and met the prisoner at an appointed place', without intending to go back, this Avas held a taking of the girl out of her father's posses- sion, since u])to tho time of her meeting tho defendant, as appointed, she had not yet absolutely renounced lioi' father's protection, and was still in his constructive possession, (3) It has been held to be an abduction, under this law, to induce the parents, by false and fraudulent rejiresentations, to allow the de- fendant to take the girl away. (4) The girl of course must bo ])rovod to bo under .sixteen and un- married. But Article 283, clause 3, expressly declares, and it has been so held, (5) that it is immaterial that the olfender believed the girl to be sixteen. , , Kvidonce of cruel treatment of tho girl by her guardian is inad- missible ; but, where persons, prompted by benevolent motives, had taken tho girl from a barn where she had sought refuge, and placed her with tlie defendant, as secretary of a society for protecting (1) R. V. Kipf>8. 4 Cox, lti7; R. v. Boolh, 12 Cox, 231; R. v. Tursleton, 1 Lev. 237; R. v. Hawley, 1 F. & F. 648. (2) R. V. Hobins, 1 C;. & K. 45(). (3) R. V. Manklelon, Dears, 159; 22 L. J. M. C. 115. (4) R. V. Hopkins, C. & Mar. 254. (5) R. V. Prince, L. R. 2 C. C. R. 154; 44 L. J. M. C 122; K. v. Robins^ supra. ABOMINABLE CRIME. — ABOKTION, 431 women and children, it was held that the defendant was not guilty of taking the girl out of the possession of the guardian. (^1) ABOMINABLE CIII.MB. fHotloiiiy. — To commit buggery, either witii a human being or with any other living creature is indictable and punishable with life imprisonment (Code, Art. 174.) And an attempt to commit the ott'ence is indictable and punishable with ten years impriscm- ment. (Code, Art. 175.) Article 200 of the Code, makes it an indictable ott'ence, punishable with ten years and whii'Pino, for any one to a.s.sault an}' penson with intent to commit sodomy, or for any male to indecently assault any other person. ABORTION. UmIiiK ^leanN to Procure Abortion. — Every one is guilty of an indictable ott'ence and liable to imprisonment for life who, with intent to procure a woman's miscarriage, whether she is OR IS NOT with child, unlawfully administers to her or causes to be taken by her any drug or other noxious thing, or unlawfully uses any instrument or other means whatsoever with the like intent. (Code. Art. 272.) And every woman is guilty of an indictable of- fence and liable to seven years' imprisonment who, whether with CHILD OR NOT, Unlawfully administers to herself or permits to be administered to her any drug or other noxious thing, or unlaw- fully uses on herself or permits to be used on her any instrument or other means whatsoever with intent to procure miscarriage. (Code, Art. 273.) Nupplyliig mieans to Procure Abortion. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' im- prisonment who unlawfully supplies or procures any drug or other noxious thing, or any instrument or thing whatsoever, knowing that the same is intended to be uniawfuUy used or employed with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, whether the is OR IS NOT WITH CHILD. (Code, Art. 274.) Where the prisoner gave a woman a drug to procure abortion, (1) R. V. Hollis, 8 L. N. 229. 432 1'RACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. and kIio took it for that purpose, in prisoner's absence, this was held a causing of it to bo taken. (1) The tiling administered must be, either in its nature or by reason of the quantity, noxious ; and it would not be suflicient if, not being actually noxious, in itself, it was merely imagined l)y the defendant that it would have the elt'ect intended. (2) But, if the drug administered actually produces miscarriage. — and there be no other evidence of its nature, — this, in itself, is sufficient evidence of its being noxious. (3) Where the drug is not noxious in itself and quite jnnoxious when administered in small quantities, yet if the quantity adminis- tered is noxious, that makes the drug so administered a noxious thing. (4) It' the drug is such that when administered in large quantities it is noxious, j'et, if the quantity administered by the defendant, is innoxious, he is not guilty of administering a noxious thing, (5) Whore the instrument used to procure an abortion was a quill, which, by its nature, might have been used for an innocent purpose, evidence was allowed to be adduced, — in order to pi'ove the intent, — showing that the prisoner had. at other times, caused miscarriages by similar means. ((5) If, in the attempt to procure abortion or after or in consequence of the abortion being etfected, the woman dies, the crime is murder, iind comes within the detinition of murder contained in Article 227d of the Code. Killing; Uiiborii Child.— Every one is guilty of an in- dictable ott'cnce and liable to imprisonment for life who causes the death of anj' child which has not become a human being, in such , a manner that he would have been guilty of murder if such child had been born. • ^ "-• ■ ^ \ ' -: ^^ .• ■; * (1) R. V. Wilson, 2(5 L. J. M. C. 18; R. v. Farrow, Dears, & B. 164. (2) R. v. Isaacs, L. & C. 220. (3) R. v. Hollis, 1 2 Cox, C. C. R. 463. (4) R. v. Cramp, 6 Q. B. D. 307 ; 49 L. ,T. M. C. 44. (5) R. V. Hennah, 13 Cox, 547. (6) R. V. Dale, 16 Cox, 703. ADMINISTERINO DRUGH. ETC. 433 2. No one in guilty of any offence who, by moann which he, in good tuith, considers necessary for the preservation of the life of the mother of the cliild, causes the deatli of any sudi child before or during its birth. (Code, Art. 271.) By Article 2l!t of the ("ode, a child only becomes a human being when it has completely proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother ; and it is not homicide to kill a child which becomes extinct before it has so become a hunuin being. So, that, Article 271 will meet the case of any wilful and unlawful killing of a child which, in consequence of injuries iiifli(!ted upon it, becomes extinct either while still in tlie womb or while it is proceeding but has not yet completely proceeded from its mother's body. A«l%'ctrtiMiii|>; I>riiKN, KU:, to Pi*ociir<> Abortion. — This is j)unishable under Article 170 of the Code by two years' imprisonment (See p. 43c, post.) ACCESSORIER. (See Parties to Crimes, pp. 58-05, ante). ACTIONS AGAINST PERSONS ADMINISTERING THE CRIMINAL LAW. (See pp. 50-53, ante. And see also Liability of Magistrates AND Justices for Illegal Acts, pp. 39-49, ante). ADMINISTERING DRUGS, ETC. A«liiiiiiisterlii); ]>rii)i[^N in oriler to I>clilt> Fe- nialc'N. — It is an indictable olfence punishable with two years' imprisonment with hard labor, to apply or administer to or cause to be taken by any woman or girl, any drug, intoxicating liquor, matter or thing, with intent to stupefy or overj)OWcr so as thereb}' to emible any person to have unlawlul carmil connection with her. (Code, Art. 185i.) Adniinistcring Poison with Intent to Mnrder. — By Article 232 of the Code, it is an indictable offence punishable by imprisonment for life, to administer or cause to be administered to any person, any poison or other destructive thing witli intent to murder. (See Homicide, post.) 4.S4 PRACTICAI; oinnE to maoisthates. l^riiKiciiiiK with Intent to <'oniinit iin ln«li<*t- abl<> Ottt'MW. — Kvoiy Olio \H guilty of iin in(lictal)lo ort'oiico uiul liahlo to im|>i'isonmc'iit for litV, and to bo whum'ED, who with Intoiil to ciialilo hiniHolf or any otlior poVHon to commit, or witli intent tlioroiiy to assist any othor person in committing any indict- able ort'enco, unlawfully a))i)lieH or administers to or causes to be taken bj', or attempts to apjily or administer to, or altem)it8 or , causes to be administered to or taken by, any person, any chlo- roibrni. laudanum or other stupefying or overpowering drug, matter or thing. (Code, Art.«244.) AdininiNterinK; Poinon and tlier4>l»;^ Hndan^er- in|i^ Ijit'c. — Every one is guilty of an indictable otfenco and liable tf» fourteen years' imprisonment who unlawfully administers or causes to bo administered to or taken by any person, any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, so as thereby to en- danger the life of such person or to intlict upon such person any gnevous bodily harm. (Code, Art. 245.) Adntinisterlni^ Poison with Intent to Injnre. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to three years' imprisonment who unlawfully administers to, or causes to be administered to or taken by, any other person, any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, with intent to injure, aggrieve or annoy such person. . (Code, Art. 246.) If the poison or destructive or noxious thing is administered merely with intent to injure, aggrieve or annoy, which in itself would bo punishable under Article 246, yet if iL does in fact endanger the life of or inflict grievous bodily hai ni upon the person to whom it js administered, it would amount to the higher oftence covered by and punishable under Article 245. (1) To warrant a conviction under Article 246, it must bo proved that the defendant intended the administration of the poison, etc., to injure, aggrieve or annoy the prosecutor ; and it was held that ■where the defendant had administered cantharides to a woman with intent to excite her sexual passion and desire so as to obtain (1) Tulley V. Corrie, 10 Cox, 640. AHMINtSTKRlNd OATHS. 43R curmvl lofiiu'ctioii with her. it was an a(lmli\i,stcnng with intoiit to " iiijuro, aggi.ovo and annoy " he. (1) Whi'thcr iho tiling is noxious or not may dcjH'nil upon tho quan tity a(iniinintcred. Thus, where the evidence showed that tho Itrisoner luiil administered eantharides to the prosecutrix, that u large dose of eantharides is poisonous, hut that tho quantity ad- ministered was insutticient to produce any ett'ect upon the human .system, it was held that the ])risoner could not he convicted of administering a "destructive and noxious thing," notwithstai'ding that he administered it with intent to injure and annoy. (2) Where the pri.soner was Indicted for having caused to he taken a certain noxious thing, namely half an ounce of oil of Juniper, with intent to procure miscarriage, and the evidence was th'at oil of juniper in considerahly less quantities than half an ounce might be taken without any ill eli'ect, but that half an ounce |)roduces ill effects, and to a pregmint woman 's da;irt''ruus, it was held that the half ounce of junijier oil was " :i lioxioMS thing." (3) Administering Oaths. AdiuliilNterliig Unlawful (tatlis. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to fourteen yeai's' im- prisonment 'vho — (a.) admiuistors, or is present at and consenting to the adminis- tration of, any oath or any engagement purporting to bind the person taking the same to commit an}' crime punishable by death or imprisonment for more than five years ; or (6.) attempts to induce or compel any person to take any such oath or engagement ; or (c.) takes any such oath or engagement. (Code, Art. 120.) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to seven years' imprisonment who — (a.) administers or is present at and consenting to tho adminis- tration of any oath or engagement purporting to bind the person taking the same ; (1) R. V. Wilkins, L. & C. 89 ; 31 L. J. M. C. 72. (3) R. V. Hennah, 13 Cox, 547. (3) R, V. Cramp, 5 Q. B. D. 307 ; 49 L. J. M. C. 44. 486 PRACTtOAIi OUIDI TO MAOIHTRATIS. (i.) to on^ugo in any mutinouH or Hediti«)U8 purpKHo ; (ii.) to (liHtiirb'the public poaco or commit or endeavour to com- mit ai»y ott'once ; (iii.) not to inl'orm and give evidence against any associate, confederate or other j)er8on ; (iv.; not to reveal or discover any unlawful combination or con- federacy, or any illegul act done or to be done or any illoi^al oath or obligation or engagement whicli may iiave been administered or tendered to or taken by any person, or the import of any such oath or obligation or engagement ; or (&.') attemjits to induce or compel any person to take an}' such oath or engagement ; or ((?.) takes any such oath or engagement. (Code, Art. 121.) Any one who, under such compulsion as would otlierwise excuse him, offends against either of the two preceding sections shall not be excused thereby unless, within the period hereinafter men- tioned, he declares the same and what he knows touching the same, and the peisons hy whom and in whoso presence, and when and where, such oath or obligation or engagement was ad- ministered or taken, by information on oath before a justice of the peace for the district, city or county in which such oath or en- gagement was administered ov taken. Such declaration may be made by him within fouhteen days after the taking ol' the oath or, if he is hindered from making it by force or sickness, then within EiunT days of the cessation of such hindrance, or on his trial if it hap])ens before the expiration of those periods. (Code, Art. 122.) These three articles are taken from sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of chapter 10 of the Consolidated Statutes of Lower Canada. With regard to the province of Quebec, there is no doubt that the re- maining sections 5. 6, 7, 8 and 9 (unrepealed) of that Act are still in force, and the law as comained in those remaining sections may probably also apply to British Columbia, Manitoba and the North-West Territorities seeing that the whole statute was simply a re-enactment of the English law on the subject as it stood, in 1837, under 52 Geo. 3, c. 104, and 7 Will. 4, & 1 Vic, c. Ul. ADULTIRY. 487 AdiiilnlNlrrliiK OathM Without. Authority.— Kvory justii'o of tlio |khuh or oilier [u^rHon who mlmiiiistorH or cauHUH or allovvH to lt« ailministerod, or rocoivos or cau8«H or ullowrt to bo roooivctl iiny oath or aftlriimlion, toiicliiii/^ any matter or tiling wherool' suoh juHtico or other porsoii has not JiiriH('ietion or cognizanee l»y Hoino law in fori'o at the time l)eing, or authorized or nuiuired Ity any such law, \h guilty of an indietahlo otfonce and litthlo to a fine not oxeoeding fifty dollars, or to inn)riHonmont for any term not exeeeding three months. 2. Notlung herein contained shall be construed to extend to any oath or affirmation before any justice in any matter or thing touching the i>reservatio\i of tlio peace, or the prosecution, trial or puni<^hment of any oticnce, or to any oath or affirmation required or auth(>rized by any law in (.'aiuida, or by any law of the province wherein such oath or aftinnation is I'ccoivoii or administered, or is to be used, or to any oath or atlirmation, whi(^h is roquired or authorized by the laws of any foreign country to give validity to an instrument in writing or to evidonco lesignod or intended to be used in such foreign country. (Code, Art. 153.) Adulteration. (See Food, post., AnrLTERY. Coni»i»ira<^9' to Induce a Woman to ('oniinit Adultery. — Kvcry one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' imprisonment who consi)ires with any other person, by false pretences, or false representations or other fraudu- lent means, to induce any woman to commit adultery or forni- cation. (Code, vVrt. 18S.) Adultery, fornication and incest are not common law offences ; but in h^nglana they are criminally cognizable under the ecclesias- tical law, although, the only one which is prosecuted in these days is incest. (1) There bting no competent Ecclesiastical Court in Canada, and the ecclesiastical law of England not being in force here, (2) none (1) ij Steph. His. Cr. L. 396. (2) In re Lord BisbcH) of Natal, 3 Moo. C C. N. 8. 115 ; Bur. Dig. Cr. L. 162. 4^8 l'U\CriO\L (MMllK Til MAfllMKATKs. ' of thcHo orti'iut'M liav«' lii'ii'tolort' liwii |iiiiiislmlili' in any piirt ot C)uni(lii. ex('t>|»t Nova Scotia, New Hniiis\viti< ami I'riiic*' Kdwanl iHiaiiii. iiii(i»'i" Hpt'cial ads rl' tilt' local lci,nslaliircN of those provin ci'H for the piiiiiHliiiuMit of iiic<'s(,(l) an<l also, as ri'^ai'ils New ilniDnwicU. for the punishiuont of a<lill(ery. (2) AnVBRTISINd. AilvortiNiiiK Aliordoii iiixl lltlior 4^Iin«*<'ii<' llrilKM. «>(<*.— Il is an in<lictalile otl'eiice |)iiiiishalile \>y two yoHi's' iinprisonnu'nt to knowingly, without lawful justification of excuse, otter to sell, advei'tise, puhlish an advertisement of, or have for sale or disposal any medicine, drut^ or article intended or represented as a nu'ans of preventing concepti(Ui or causinj^ ultortion. (Codo, Art. IT'.t.) Adv«'rtlNiiiK f^oiiiitorloit .^4»iii>y. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable otteiue and liaLjIe to five years' imprison- ment, who (a.) printH, writes, utter , puhlishes, Hells, lends, gives away, circulates or distributes any letter, writing, circular, jtapor, pamph- let, handbill or any written or printed matter advertising, or otter ing or purporting to advertise or offer for sale, loan, exchange, gift or distribution, or to furnish, procure or distribute, any coun- terfeit token of value, or what purj)ort8 to bo a counterfeit token of value, or giving or purporting to give, either directly or in- directly, inforniation where, how, of whom, or by what means any counterfeit token of value, or what purports to bo a counter- feit token of value, may be procured or had ; or {f>.) ]>urchaHOH. exchanges, accepts, takes possession of or in any way uses, or otters to purchase, exchange, accept, take possession of or in any way, use, or negotiates or offers to negotiate with a view of purchasing or obtaining or using any such counterfeit token of value, or what purports so to be ; or (c.) in executing, operating, promoting or currying on any (1) R. 8. N. S. (3rd S.), c. 160, 8. 2; R. S. N. B., c. 145, 8. 2. 24 Vic. (P. E I.),c. 27,8. 3. (2) R. S. N. B. c. 145, 8. 3 ; Burb. Dig. 162. AhVKKTIHiNd, 4:i!t . Hclicmi' tir (Icvitc to ilctVuiKl. l>y tho uhc or \ty int'iiiis itf iiiiy |)a|KM's, writintft, Ii'IIith, circiilui's or wriltni <ir in'intfd nmltt'rs cuiict'i'iiiiii; t he DlVcriiiL; I'nr salt', Itmii. i^if'l , (li«l riltiilidii >>r fxchaii^c of coiintcr- I'cil toUcris ul' valiio, iihcm any tiililii)iiN, I'alsi'nr assumed iiaiiu' iir uddri'MH, or any iianic or address n| her tliaii Ids own rifjclil, propiT and lawt'iil naiiu' ; or ((I.) Ill till- cxt'iMitioii, o|M'ratiiit^, proMiotiiii; or (■arryiiif; on, of any scliciiic or dfvicc otlcriii^ tor saU-. loan, ;rit't or distribution, or |)iir|iortin^ to oiler for salo, loan, ^it't or diniriluitiop, or i/ivin^ or purporting to ^ivo information, directly or indiroitly, whore, how, of whom or hy what means any counterfeit t(du'ii of value may 1k' ohtaiiied or had, Unowi!i|r|y receives or takes from the mails, or from tho post offlee, any letter or pa(d.ai^e addrcsNod to any su<h flctitiouM, false or assumed naiiu' or address, or namo other than his own i'iu;lit, proper or lawful name. (Code, Art. 4H(I.) Priiiiii fill*!*' fivid<'ii<*4' 4»ii I'riirtMMliiiKN t'ur ildvcrtlNillK <'4»llllt«'rt'<>it .^oiioy.— On the trial of any porson charged witli the otfenees mentioned in section 4H(». any letter, circular, writing or paper otferiiig or pur|MMiing tootVer for Hale, loan, gift or distrihution, or giving (>r purporting to give information, directly or indirectly, whore, how, <d" wh^m or iiy what means any counterfeit token of value may he ohtained or had, or coneerning any similar seheine or device to defraud tlu' [luhlic, shall \n? prima facie evidence of the fraudulent character of Hiich Hchome or device, (Code, Art. 093.) An otler to purchase hank notes which are genuine luit fin- signed is not an otler to jiurchaso counierfeit tokens of value, even if tho person otforing to [lurchase them made such otter under the belief that tliey were counterfeit. (1) A«lv(>rtiNinK Reward for Itetiini of Ntoleii Property. — (See Compounding, ;)os<.) Advektiskment. PriiitliiK AtlvertlNCineiitN, C'HrdN, (/irciilikrM, «'tcv ill liikenONM ol'llaiik IVotew.— Every one is guilty of ( 1 ) R. V. Atwood, 20 Ont. R. 574. '■ i ■ 440 I'KAOTirAI. Ill I UK to maiiihthatkh. an otVt'iit'i' and lialilc. mi Kiiiniiiary cniiviction iK'tiirr two jiiHlirt'H oC till* |u'aro. to a liiM- ot' oiu- liiiiHln<<| ilollars m- iIu'in' moiitliK' itii |iriMnmn«'iil, or liotli, who tlonigiiM, fiij^iavt'M, priiitH or in any tiiamu'r maUt-M, fxccutt'H, iittcix, Ihwiich, dislrilmtt's, circulates (»r um'm any ImsincNw or proti-Hsioinj) can!, notice, |ilacani, circniur, hand-hill or advcrtlHcincnt in the likeneMN or Hiniilitiide of any hanU note, or any ohli^ation or s«'curity of any (iovernini'iit oi' any hanU. (Code, Art. 44L'.) Akkrav. v\n utVray i« tht! act of lii;hlini; in a.iy puhlie Htroct or highway, or ti^^htin^ to the alarm of I lie |iiililic in uny othur place to which t lie puhlic have accoHH, '1. KVery one who taken part in an affray in guilty of an indiot- ahle olfence and liaiile to one year's imprisonment with hard labour. (('od(!. Art. !KI.) The i;ssence ol' this (dlence is its tendency to alarm people ut or near the scono of th« ti^lit. it is not necessary that actual terror should exist ; hut it will bo inferred hy the law from tho fuct of \\w li/fhtini; taking place in a puhlic stri't't or highway, or in any other place accessible to the puhlic. AoBNoy. C'riiiiiniil Iiitil»ilit>' of l*riii<'i|»alN uiiil A)i;t'iitN. -T-A person is not, as a geiu'ral ruh', criminall}' ivsponsihli- for tho acts of anotlier; but a man nuiy be brought, under some circuin- Htances. within the crimiiuil law by the acts of his agents or servants. We have scon that where a person omphij's, solicits or advises another to commit a crime, in his absence, he and tho agent aro equally principal olVendcrs. (I) An agent or servant who, knowing the facts, does a criminal act for his principal or master, is answerable to the crimiiuil law precisely as though he had proceeded solf-moved, and for his own personal benefit. The command of a 8U])erior to an inferior, — as of a parent to a child, or of a master to his servant, or of a princi- (1) See Parties to Offences, p. 58, ante. AuiNor. 441 pul to hin iii^oiit, — will not jUHtit'y ii (^riniMiiil net dom* in purNiiarict* of it. (1) Ah iij^oiit, who in H\u'\\ lor civil |tur|M)MCH only, caimot l»y iiii uiiuulliot'i/.«><l it(^t rondtM' IiIn itrinciiMii ahNworahlo tor u hrracli ot th« criminal law. Itut tht* primipal in criininally n>s|)oiiHili|«.> for what tht> a^cnt docH iimloi- hin prinripalH aiilhority. Ami, if tiio biiMinoHN ilHoif involves a violation of lh(< law, the antliorization l>y tho principal or ftnpli>yt'r of an a^cnl nr scrviml to iondiu-t it will hrin^ K"''' np"" •'"' i'l'iiit'ij'iil or ina.slt'r whcnovt-r the thini^dono ihcn'in is a (M'iMiiinil oUcnci' ; and this will not prevent the a^ent (ir servant, will' has d<ine the act, from liein^ eipially guilty with tho principal. Thns. where thu koeper of a place of pnhlic rewort left his premises in the nnimif^ement (d' a servant, and prostitutes were, in vi'datioii (d' the Kn^lish Lieense .\et. sntl'ered to visit and renmin therein, it was held that the nu^'e relation of maHter and servant neither nuid') nor prevented tho latter from hein/Lj an aider and uliettor in the oll'enee, hut that if tlii' servant, in harhorinjf, was carrying out tho nuister'h orders, the master was /^(nilty as principal, and tho servant as aiding and ahelting. (2) i\nd u shopkeeper has Itoen liold crimimdly liable for tlu* uidawful act of u servant in tduirge of the store in selling li(juor without a license, although done in the shopkeeper's absence. (3) Under a ectit)n of the Kng''sli fjicense Act, which nuikos it an otVence foi- a liconsod person to knowingly harbor on his premiHOH any constable on duty, or to siipj)|y him with liquor, etc., it was even held that a master might be convicte<l for the act of his servant, though tho master was personally ignorant ui' it. (t) Hut it has boon hold, in some later casos, that whoro thore is no ovidonco to show any connivance or wilful blindness on tho pai't, of tho licensed jterson — if he does not shut his eyes, and is himself really and bona fide ignorant — he is not liable, and that tho knowledge of the servant, under such circumstances, is not sufficient to justify u conviction against the, master. (5) (1) 1 Bish. New. Cr. L. Com., as 355, 892 ; Broom'B Leg. Max. 2 Ed. 11 (2) Wilson V. Stuart, 32 L. J. Q. B. 311. (3) li. V. King, 20 U. C, C. P. 246. (4) MuUins v. Collins, L. R., 9 Q. B. 292; 43 L. J. M. C. 67. (5) Somerset v. Hart, 12 Q. B. D. 360; 53 L. J. M. C. 77; 48 J. P. 327 Newman v. Jones, 17 Q. B. D. 132 ; 55 L. J. M. C. 113. ' 44B PRACTlrAI, (IIIDK Ti) MAdlHTRATKS. Kill ploy <'r*N liitil»ilil,Y lor ll<>raiiialor.y iiiiiftcr Hold by Ncrvaiii. — Tho walo by a Horviuil o\' any book, niat,'a- zinc, itaiuplih't or other thing, whether periodieal or not, shall not make hiw employer criniinally responnible in respect of defainatory matter contained therein, wn/ess it he proved that such employer au- thorized such sale, knowing that such book, etc., contained defamatory matter, or, in ease of a number or part of a periodieal, that defam- atory matter was habitually contained in such periodical. (Code, Art. 2!>S. 8s. 2.) PIcdKiiiK hy Fa<*tor or A){t'iit. — No factor or agent shall be guilty of theft by pledging or giving u lien on any goods or document of title to goi)d8 intrusted to him for the j)urpo8e of sale or otherwise, for any sum of money not greater than the amount duo to lum from his principal at the time of pledging or giving a lien on the same, together with the amount of any bill of exchange accepted by him for or on account of his principal. (Code, Art. :{05, ss. 5.) AoENTS. TllC'lt by A}(eiit. — £'(/T/-i/ one commits theft who, having received any mone3' or valuable security or other thing whatsoever, on terms requiring him to account for or pay the same, or the pro- ceeds thereof, or any part of such proceeds, to any other person, though not requiring him to deliver over in specie the identical money, valuable security oi- other thing receiveil. fraudulently con- verts the same to his own use, or frouclulently omits t<j account for or pay the same or any part thereof, or to account for or pay such proceeds or any part thereof, which he was required to account for or pay as atbresaid. : > • / . v " J . ' ;• i 2. I'roviiled. that if it be part of the said terras that the money or other thing received, or the proceeds thereof, shall form an item in'a debtor and creditor account l)etween the person receiving the same and the ])erson to whom he is to account tor or pay the same, and that such last mentioned person shall rely only on the persoiuil liability of the other as his debtor in resj)ect thereof, the proper entry of such money or proceeds, or any part thereof, in such account, shall be a sutticient accounting for the mouthy or proceeds, ()r part thereof s<j entered, and in such case no fraudulent conver- AGENTS. 443 8ion of the amount accounted for shall bo decm('<l to luivc lakcri place. (Code, Art. 3(»8.) TIk'IY by lloldt'r of Power of \ttnr^u^^y,—/<:very one commits tlicft who. being ontru.itod, either solely or jointly with any other pei-son. with any power of attorney for tlie sale, mortjjfage, pledge or other disposition oi' nny property, rcid or ])er- Honal. whether callable of lieing stolen or not. fraud u lent I}- sclh, mortgages, pledges or otherwise disposes of the same or any part thereof or IVaudulently converts the |>roceeds of any sale, mort- gage, jtledge or other disposition of such pro|)erty. or any )tart of such proceeds, to some pur|iosc other than that for which he was intrusted with snch power of attorney. (Code. Art. ."50!).) Offences against Articles 308, 30!> and 310, are punishable by 14 years imprisonment under Article 320; and Article 3.')7 pro- vides that when, in cases of theft, the value of the article exceeds $200, two years shall be added to the term ol' iiliprisonnu'nt. Th4>tll l»y .^liMiippropriatiiiH; Fr4»«'<><'<lN II<>I<I under lliri'ctioii, — Eoery one commits theft who. — having received, cither solely or jointly with any other person, any money or valuable security or any power of attorney to sell any property, real or personal, with a direction that such money, oi- any ])art thereof, or the ])roceed8, or any part of the proceeds of such secu- rity, or such property, shall be applied U> any purpose or paid to any pei-son specitied in such direction, — in violation of good faith and contrary to such direction, fraudulently applies, to any other pur|)ose, or paj^s to any other person, such money or proceeds, or any part thereof. 2. Provided, that where the person receiving such money, secur- ity or power of attorney, and the person from whom he receives it, deal with each other on such terms that all money paid to the I'ormcr would, in the absence of any such dii'ection, be properly treated as an item in a debtor and creditor account between them, this section shall not apply, unless such direction is in writing. • , The law, as now contained in the above Articles 308, 309, and 310, is so framed as to appl}' not only to bankers, merchants, brok- ers, attorneys and agents, but to all jiersons whomsoever, and 2!> 444 PRAOTIOAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. they are also ho f'nimod that it shall not be essential, (especially in connoftion with Articles 308 and 310), that the direction, if any, should bo in writiny, nor that the conversion or other wrong- ful dealing, in order to be theit, be against some direction m writ- ing, but. that if there is no written direction, it si ill be sufficient to show that the conversion or other wiongful dealing was against a verbal direction. Aqgres8ion8 by Foreigners. (See Levying War, ^osf)- Aiders and Abbettors. (Sec Parties to Offences, p. 58, ante. ^ Allegiance. Matural and Liocal Allei^iaiive. — The duty of alle- giance is based upon the relation which subsists between him who owes it and the Crown, and upon the privileges derived by the former from that relation. Allegiance is either natural or local. Natui'al allegiance is that which a natural born subject owes at all times and in all places to theiJrown as head of that society of which he is a member. Local allegiance is founded upon the protection which a foreigner enjoys for his pci'son, his family and effects during his residence here ; and if such foreigner while so resident here commit an oifence which in the case of a natural born subject would be treason, he is dealt with as a traitor ; and this is so, whe- ther his sovereign be at peace with us or not. (1) . ' • (See Oaths OF Allegiance, ^osf.) . ' Animals. AiilinaiN capable of being stolen. — (See Theft, post.) ^; '.''■' ■■;'.-.■,..' /;:',V^-: ■;''■:■:.,•''..'• ^- -' Killinig, 9Ialinln)g or Injuring Animals, not being Cattle. — Every one is guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a penalty not exceeding $100, over and (1) Broom'B Comm. on Com. L., 5 Ed. 877, 878. ANIMALS. 445 • ■,...-.-■■.■■■ above the umouiit oC injury done, oi* to three months' impriHou- ment, with or without hard labour, who wilfully kills, maims, wouiuIh, poisons or injuroH any dog, bird, beast, or other animal, not being cattle, but being either the subject of larceny at common law, or being onliiuirily kepi in a state of confinement, or kept for any lawful purpose. 2. Every one who, having been convicted of any such offence, afterwards commits any offence under this section, is guilty of an indictable offence, and liable to a fine or impinsonment, or both, in the discretion of the court. (Code, Art. 501.) The imprisonment under clause 2 of this Article will be five years. (See Art. 1)51, of the Code.) Tlicft ol" uiliiiialiii. — Kvery one commits theft, and steals the creature killed who kills any living creature capable of being stolen with intent to steal the carcase, skin, plumage or any part of 8uci> creature. (Code, Art. 307.) The stealing of cattle is punishable, under Article 331, of the Code, by fourteen years imprisonment ; and, according to Article 30*7, the same punishment will apply to any one killing cattle with intent to steal the carcase, etc., thereof. ^itealiiiK: <Io};n, birdN, l»ea«ti«, etc. — Kvery one is guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a penalty , not exceeding twenty dollars over and above the value of the pro- jjcrt}- stolen, or to one month's imprisonment with hard labour, who steals any dog, i>r any bird, beast or other animal oi'dinarily kept in a state of confinement or for any domestic purpose, or /or any lawful purpose of profit or advantage. -'^ 2. Every one who, having been convicted of any such offence, afterwards commits any such offence, is liable to three mouths' imprisonment with hard labour. (Code, Art. 332.) Plgeond. — Hvery one who unlawfully and wilfully kills, wounds or takes any house-dove or pigeon, under such circumstan- ces as do not amount to theft, is guilty of an offence and liable, upon complaint of the owner thereof, on summary conviction, to a penaUy not exceeding ten dollars over and above the yalue of the bird. (Code, Art. 333.) 440 PRACTirAI, (lur'iE to M.\»1IST1I.\TKS. Undor tho HvHt clauso ol' Arti'ile H(»4 of tlic CoiW, taiiu' |)igt'()iiH, whilo in a doviH'ote, or on llioii' ownor's land arc cajiaMi' of lieini; Htolon. Tlu' pnnishnuMit would Ik' inidor Artick' 'Aii'2. aupra. OyNltTN. — Kvi'ry one is ,i^iiilt3' ol' an indiclalik' ort'cnco and Habit' to sovt'ii years' iniprisonnionl who sttuils oystors or oystor brood. . 2. Kvory one is guilty ol' an indietublo ott'onco anci liable to throe month's imprisonment, wlio uidawl'ully and wilfully uses any dredge or not, i''strunient or engine wliatsocver, within the limits of any oyster bed, laying or ti'^^hery, being the property of any other person, and suftieiently marked out or known as such, for the purpose of taking oysters or oyster brood, although none aro actually taken, or unlawfully and wilfull}', with any not, instru- ment or engine, drags uj)on tho ground of any sueh fishery. Nothing herein applies to any person fishing for or catching any swimming fish within the limits of any oyster fishery with any not, instruments or engine adai)ted for taking swimming fish only. (Code, Art. 334.) (See Cattle, post.) • ' . (See Cruelty to Animals, post.) Arms. '■''' ''\ ■ ■' (See Offensive Weapons, jy&s^) \ * Ahmy and Navy. ' ^ Iiicltini; to :?Iutiiiy.— Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life who. foj- any traitorous or mutinous purpose, endeavours to seduce any j)er.son serving in Her Majesty's forces by sea oi- land from his dut}- and allegiance to Her Majesty, or to incite or stir up any such })erson to commit any traitorous or mutinous practice. (Code, Art. 72.) GiiticiiiK' Noldicrw or H»ilor» to Desert.— Hvery one is guilty of an indictable oft'ence who, not being an enlisted soldier in Her Majesty's sei-vice, or a seaman in Her Majesty's naval service — / AKMY AND NAVY. 44t (a.) by words or with money, or by any other moans whatso- ever, directly or indirectly, persuades or procures, or goes about or endeavours to persinule, prevail on or procure, any such seaman or soldier to desert from or leave ller Majesty's military or naval service ; or {b.) conceals, receives or assists any deserter from ller Majesty's nnlitary or naval service, knowing him to be such deserter. 2. The ott'ender may be prosecuted by indictment, or summarily before two justices of the peace. In the former case he is liable to tine and imprisonment in the discretion of the court, and in the latter to a penalty not exceeding two hundred dollars, and not less than eighty dollars and costs, and in default of payment to im- prisonment for any term not exceeding six months. (Code, Art. 7;{.) This article provides that an ott'ender may be prosecuted either by indictment or summarily, and it specifies the penalty to be incurred on a summary conviction ; but in the case of a conviction upon indictment, although it enacts that the ott'ender shall be liable to tine and impnsonment in the discretion of the couit, it does not specify the amount of the tine nor the length of the imprisonment. Article 951, liowever, provides that a person convicted of an in- dictable ott'ence for which no punishment is specially provided shall be liable to five years imprisonment. Section 9. E. S. C, chap. 169, ;>rovides that one moiety of the amount of any penalty recovered under this Article shall go to the prosecutor and the other moiety to the Crown. Any one reasonably 8U8])ected of being a deserter from Her Ma,je8ty's service may be arrested and brought before a justice of the peace and held till claimed by the militarj'^ or naval authorities. (See Art. 561, Code.) Resisting; Execution of Warrant for Arrest of Deserters. — Every one who resists the execution of any war- rant authorizing the breaking open of any building to search for any deserter from Her Majesty's military or naval service is guilty of an ott'ence and liable, on summary conviction before two justices of the peace, to a penalty of eighty dollars. (Code, Art. 74.) 448 I'RAOTIOAL aUIDK TO MAQtHTRATES. No one is entitled to break open any building to search for a deserter witl"»ut leaving obtained a warrant lor that purpose from a justice of the peace. (See Art. 6({1, Code.) Entit'iiiK Militittinc'ii or IVIoiiiited Police to DeKiert* — l*jVory one is guilty of an ottenco and liable, on sum- mary conviction, to six months' imprisonment, with or without hard labour, who — (a.) persuades any man who has been enlisted to serve in any corps of militia, or who is a member of or has engaged to serve in the North-West mounted police force, to desert, or attempts to procui-e or ]>ersuade any such man to desert ; or (6.) knowing that any such man is about to desert, aids or assists him in deserting ; or (ft.) knowing any such man is a deserter, conceals such man or aids or assists in his rescue. (Code, Avt. 76.) Kecelviiiis Kc||(lmenfal IVcceNNarlcN, etc., from fSoldiern or Deserters. — Rvery one is guilty of an indict- able offence and liable on conviction, on indictment, to five years' imprisonment, and, on summary conviction before two justices of the peace, to a penalty not exceeding forty dollai'S, and not less than twenty dollars and costs, and, in dofauH of payment, to six months' imprisonment with or without hard labour, who — (a.) buys, exchanges or detains, or otherwise receives, from any soldier, militiamen or deserter, any arms, clothiiig nr furniture be- longing to Her Majesty, or any such articles belonging to any soldier, militiamen or deserter as are generally deemed regiTnental necessaries according to the custom of the army ; or (6.) exchanges, buys or receives, from any soldier or riilitiaman, any provisions, without leave in writing from the officer commanding the regiment or detachment to which such soldier belongs. (Code, Art. 390.) See sec. 13 of 38 & 39 Vic, c. 26 (Imp.), and 44-46 Vic, c. 68, 8. 166 (Imp.), and note, at p. 908 of Archbold on Cr. PI, & Ev.> 21 Ed. ARMY AND NAVY. 449 KeeeiviiiK, c^c, MeceNNariea from ]9IarliieN or MeMertvrM* — Kvory ono iH guilty of uii indictublo ortbi»c(» uiul liable, on conviction, on indictment, to tivo youi-s' iinpriHoninont, and on sumrauiy conviction bof'oro two juntico^: of the peace, to a penalty not exceeding ono hundred and twenty doUarH, and not lesh than twenty dollacH and costs, and in default of payment to six months' imprisonment, who buys, exchanges or detains, or otherwise receives from any seaman or marine, upon any account- whatsoever, or has in his possession, any arms or clothing, or any Huch articles, belonging to any seaman, marine or deserter, as are generally deemed necessaries according to the custom of the navy. (Code, Art. 391.) KvcelvInK, etc., a Seainaii'M Property. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable ottence who detains, buys, exchanges, takes on pawn or receives, from any seaman or any person acting for a seaman, any seaman's property, or solicits or entices any sea- man, or is einjjloyed by any seaman to sell, exchange or pawn any seaman's property, unless he acts in ignorance of the same being seaman's property, or of the person with whom he deals being or acting for a seamau, or unless the same was sold by the order of the Admiralty or Commander-in-Chief. 2. The otfender is liable on conviction, on indictment, to tivo years' imprisonment, and, on summary conviction, to a penalty not exceeding one hundred dollars ; and for a second otfenco, to the same penalty, or, in the discretion of the justice, to six months' imprisonment, with or without hard labour. 3. The expression " seaman " means every person, not being a commissioned, warrant or subordinate officer, who is in or belongs to Her Majesty's navy, and is borne on the books of any one of Her Majesty's ships in commission, and every person, not being an offlcor as aforesaid, who, being borne on the booki of aliy hired vessel in Her Majeoty's service, is, by virtue of any act of Parliament of the United Kingdom for the time being in force for the discipline of the navy, subject to the provisions of such act. 4. The expression " seaman's property " means any clothes, slops, medals, necessaries or articles usually deemed to be necessaries for sailors on board ship, which belong to any seaman. 450 I'HAOTICAL UUIDE TO MAUI8TBATB8. 5. Tlif oxprcHNioti "Adiuirulty" iiu-iuih tin* Jjo.'d Ili^^li A<linirul of (lie I'liilod Kinj^iloni, or |1k comiinHHinnorH tor i-xtu-iitin/jf tlio otHco of LonI llif,Mi Admiral. (<'ndf, Art. .-{Uli.) Wot NiitlNtyiuK •liiNtir<> that PomnonmIoii ol'Hca- iiiun*N Property In Ijawiiil. — Kvory one, in whimi pnH- wssioii any HOiimnn'H proporty is found who doos not Niiti«fy the , JuKtico of tho p«aco before whom he is taken or Humnionod that he came Ity Hueh property hiwfuUy, in liable, on nummary conviction, to a tine of iwonty-tive dollars. (Code, Art. 31)3.) Ahrest. (Hoe Summary Abrest, p. 1)1, aute.) Arson. Kver}- one is guilty of the indietahlo ott'once of arson, and liable to imprisonment for life, who wilfully seta fire to any building or strueturo, whether such building, erection orstructure is completed or not, or to any stack of vegetable produce or of mineral or vege- table fuel, or to any mine, or any well of oil or other combustible substance, or to any ship or vessel, whether completed (»a not, or to any timber or matenals placed in any shipyard for building or repairing or fitting out any ship, or to any of Jlor Majesty's stores or munitions of war. ((Jode, Art. 482.) Arson, at common law, was a felony, and was the malicious and wilful burning of the house of another. (1) The burning of a party's own house did not come within this definition ; although the burn- ing of a man's own house in a town or so near to other houses as to create danger to them was a great misdemeanor at common law ; (2) and, to constitute arson at common law, there must have been an actual turning of the whole or some part of tho house, (3) although it was not necessary that any flame should be visible. (4) But clause 3, of Article 481 of the Code, provides that where an (1) 3 Inst. 66; 4 Bl. Com. 220. (2) 1 Hale, 568 ; 2 East, P. C. 1027. (3) 1 Uale. 569. (4) R. V. RuBsell, 1 C. &. M. 641 ; R. v. Stallion, R, & M., C. C R., 398 ; B. V. Parker, 9 C. & P. 45. AHHON, 4S1 oH'ciuH! coiimHtH ill an injury to aiiytliiiig in which tho oHoimUm' huH an iiitorost, tho oxistenc'o oI'mucIj intoruHl Mhiill not pTOVont his act tit'in/; an ort'iMict' if (i(>in> with int«'n» to (U'fraud. Ami, thnn«tori). a jHTstin will l)(i gnilly of arson cvon if liu hv thi< ownor of tho hnilding, etc., if ho wilfully m«tH tiru to it, with intent to defraud: and if ho ho not tho ownor of, hut havo oidy koiho partial intoroHt in tho l)uildin<^, et<'., ho will ho guilty of arsou iiy notting tiro to it. whothor ho dooM it with intont to dofraud or not. It will ho soon, that, iuHtoad of tho words «'///«/ burning, u»od in tho oonunoii law dotinition of arson, tho words usod in Artiolo 482 arc, m)j7/^m//^ 8«<s fire to. nu'roly ; and tho Itnrning of any part of tho huilding, e/c, howovor slight, will bo sutHoiont, although the tire ho aftorwui'da oxtinguishod. (I) Whoro tho quostioii is, whothor tho hurning was acoidrntal or WILFUL, ovidonoo is admissiblo to show that, on anothor occasion, the defendant was in such a situation as to render it ]»robahlo that he was then engaged in tho coniniissiou of the like otfonce against tho same ])roi)orty ; (2) or, that ho had jireviously occupied houses which had hoen on tire and in respect of which he made insuranco claijiis and got paid ; (3) hut on a charge of arson, where the question was as to the prisoner's identity, evidence that, a few days previous to tho tire in question, another building of the prosecu- tor's was on tire, and that the prisoner was then standing by with a demeanor showing inditferonco or gratification, was re- jected. (4) An unfinished house, of which all tho walls, external :».nd inter- nal, are built and finished, the roof on, and completed, the ♦looriug of a considerable part laid, and the intonial walls and ceilings pre- pared for plastering, was held to be a " building.'' (5) It will bo seen, that, Article 482 covers any building or structure whatever, whether completed or not ; and, therefore, the distinct- ions formerly existing, as shown by a number of cases cited in (1) 1 Hawk, c. 39, s. 17; 1 Hale, 569; Dalt. 506. (2) R. V. Dossett, 2 C. & K. 306. (3) R. V. Gray, 4 F. & F. 1102; and R. v. Yoke, R. & R.531. (4) R. V. Harris, 4 F. & F. 3t2. (5) R. V. Manning, L. R. 1 C. C. R. 338; 41 L. J. M. C. 11. 462 PRAOTIOAL (inlDB TO MADIHTKATIH. ArcliboM, (1) ill n^giird to tho (Icrtcriptioii of tlio liiiililiii^, or itH Htiiti! of complotoneHH or iricomplctoiicHH, uro no longor iiiatitrial. Whon n pcrHon Ih (tliiirgtMl with Htittinj^ Urc to IiIm own Iiouho, the Intont to dofraiid, — which, uccorditig to Article 481, cIhiinc .*{, Ih an oHHontial iiigrcdiont of the ofVciicc, — cannot [w inlVrrod IVoin tho act itHcIt', hut muHt be proved l»y other evidence. Where, there- lore, a defendant wiih ciiargud with arnon with intent to defraud un inHuraiicc c(>ni|iany, and a HutKcient notice to produce the in- Riirance policy had not been given, it waH held that Hccoiidary evi- dence of it could not he given, and, that, there being no other evidence of the iiiHurance. the defendant muHt be ac»iuitted. (2) In one case, the counsol for tho proHeculion Hiiggested, an a motive for tho act, the defendant'H deiHire to realiwe the amount of an iiiHurance which hIio had upon her goodn ; and. upon evidence being tendered to hIiow that she wiih in easy circunistances. so as to negative the suggested motive, the evidence was admitted. (3) A (juantity of straw, packed on a luriy, in ctuirse of IransmiH- Hioii to market, and left for tho night in an inn-yard, was held not to be a s<ac/t of straw. (4) Whore a sailor on board a sliip entered a jmrtof the vessel, where Hpirits were kept, for the jturposo of stealing some rum, and, while ho was tapping a cask, a lighted match held by^ him, came in con- tact with the spirits wliich were flowing from tho cask tapped by him, and a tiro ensued, which destroyed the vessel, it was held that a conviction for arson of tho ship could not, under these circum- BtnncoB, be uphold. (5) A pleasure boat, eighteen feet long, was set tire to, and Patteson, J., inclined to think, that it was a vessel within tho meaning of the Act, but the prisoner was acquitted on tho merits, and no decided opinion was given. (6) (1) Arch. Cr. PI. & Ev. 21 Ed. pp. 590, 591. (2) R. v. KitBon, Dears. 187 ; 22 L. J. M. C. 118. (3) R. V. Grant, 4 F. & F. 322. (4) R V. Satchwell. L. R., 2 C. C. R., 21 ; 42 L. J. M. C. 63. (6) R. V. Faulkner. 13 Cox, C. C. R. Ir. 550. (tf) R. v. Bowyer, 4 C, «& P. 659. ARHON. W.i Aitriiipt io <'oiiiiiilt ArNOii.— Kvory ono Im guilty of an iiKlictiihlf otl't'iu** uiul lialiU' to lourU^t'ii yt'iiPH' iiiipriHu iimiil, who wilfully iitlt'ii»|tts to Hi't th'f to imythiiijf mcntioncil in ArlicU' 4H2, or who wilfully sotH lire to any HiilmtaiKo ho Mituatfd that lie knowH that anything nioiitionod in thi< hint pmcotMliMg wt«!ti(»ii in likely to catch tiro thcivfroni. ((!o(U«, ^Vrt. 4H;{.) A, waH char^t'd with attcniptintij to wt Hm to a (Iwi'llinj^-houw, and I), with inciting and hiring; him to coniinit tht< olhtntc Under H'h direct ion.H A. had arranged and placed pieces of hlanki-t Natiirated with coal-oil againnt the doors and HashoH of tlie iionno, liad lighted a match which he held in his lingers till it was burn- ing well, and had then put the light down close to the hlankel with the intention of setting the house on fire, hut just l)efore the hia/.e touched the hlanlcet the light went out, and lie threw away the mat(di without making any further attempt. Held, that the attempt was complete. (1) The men' act of buying a box of mat(dics with the intention of using them to set a corn stack on tire is too remote to constitute an attcmjit to sot tho Hre. But where the evidence showed that the [irisoner had knelt down before a corn stack and had actually lighted a nuitch with the intention of setting the stack on tire, and blew out the light, on observing that he was watched, it was held that this was an attempt to burn the stack. (2) NettiiiK Fire to ('ropN, Ktt*. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable otl'ence, and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment, who wilfully sets tire t<t — (a,) any crop, whether standing or cut down, or any wood, forest, coppice or plantation, or any heath, gorse, furze or fern ; or ' (6.) any tree, lumber, timber, logs, or floats, boom, dam or slide, and thereby injures or destroys the same. (Code, Art. 484.) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to seven years' imprisonment who wilfully attemi'TS to sot fire to anything mentioned in the last precoeding section, or who wilfully sets tire to any substance so situated that he knows that anything men- (1) R v. Goodman, 22 U. C. C. P. 338. (2) R. V. Taylor, 1 F. & F. 511, 512. 454 I'HAirricAi. uhiuk to maoihthatkh. ti<»iu>(i ill thtt luMt |iri>i'tMliii|{ N«>i'tiiiii iH likt'ly li> cittrh Itiv thui't*- In.m. (("(»< If, Art. IHrt.) A ilcri'iKliiiit, who m'l tin' to ii kuiihikm' Iioiihi* in a wood, wliicli lire WHS tlifiu'c rniiiiiMiiiifUtcd to tht< wood, wuh held to lie prii|i«ti'ly convic'ti'd on an iiidictint'iil clmr^in^ liiiii with Hcttiiii; tiro to \h^^ wood. (1) Whvn* u |»riMoiit'r wan iiidiclod tor Hfltiii;; Hit to ^rowiii^ furs'/', Lo|)«'Z, .1.. dii'(<('tt<d thi> jury that it'Nht> mc| tire to the tur/A>, thiiik- iiiK< iiltl'on^h orroiiootiNly, that h\h> had a ri^'lit to do ho. thcyoii^lil not lf» convict hi>r. (2) lt«'4*kl«*NMl;»' NeltliiK FIrt' lo iiiiy For<'Ml« Trfe, Witv* — Kvcry on*) in ><uilty of an indictahii' otfcnco and iiahlc to two yearn' inipriHonrncnt, whi>. hy .such nc;,'ii^cii(c an nhown liiin lo ho rccitk'HM or wantoidy roifardlcMs of coiisi'(|nonccH, or in viola- tion of a provincial or municipal law of tho locality, wts Hiti lo any forost, tree, nninufacturt'd lumhcr, sfjuarc tiniiicr, lo^«or tloatn, hooni, dam or wlidu on the Crown donuiin, or land Icaniid or law- fully hold for tho purpoHo of cutting timhor, <tr on privatt* pro- porty, on any crook t)r rivfr, or rollway, hoach (m- wharf, so that the same »'s injured or destroyed. 2. The ma^iHtratu invoHligating any MUch charg«' may, in his dis- crotion, if tho couwquoncos luvvo not boon HoriouH, diHpoMo of the nuittor Huuinuirily, without wonding tho otiondor for trial, hy im- poaing a tlno not oxeooding fifty dollars, and in default of payment, hy Lho committal of tho otfondor to prison for any torm not ox(!Ood- ing 8ix months, with or without hard labour. (Codo, Art. 480.) ThreatN to Burn. — Kvory one h guilty of un indictable otibnco and liable to ton yoars' impriNonmont who wondH, delivorH or utters, or directly or indirectly cauHOH to l)o received, knowing the oontentH thereof, any letter or writing threatening to burn or doH- troy any building, or any rick or staolc of grain, hay or straw or other agricultural produce, in or under any building, or any ship or veHsel. (Codo, Art. 487.) Clause 2, of Article 969 of the Code, (pp. 419, 420, ante), pro- (1) R. V. Prioe,9C. &P. 729. (2) R. V. Twoee, 14 Cox, 327. AHtAl'LTN. 4&5 vlditH Unit, ii|Miii ('•irii|ilaiiit Ity any porMori, thiit, oii uccoiiiit of ttii'calH or oil any Dtlirr ai roiiiit, the (■oinplainaiil Ih, mi r(>aHOiial)l(t j^nMiiiilft, alVaid that IiIh |iro|i(>rty will lie set tin- (<», tin- jiiHtict' ht<arini{ tlio riiiii|ilaiiit may ivqitiro tho purNon, wlio lian madi' tho tliroalM. to ^iv<' Mcciirily to l<c>i'|» tlio poacu. ANHAriiTH. .iMNiillIt ll<'fiil(>(l.- -All asHiiiilt \H tl.i' act o|' intentionally upplyiii^ lone 1(1 ilic iKTMoii of anotlicr, diivctly or in<liiv<!tly, or aft»'Mi|iliii^ or llircalt'iiiii)^. Iiy any act or j^cHturo. to ajiply f'onu to the |ici-Koii o|' aiioilicr. if the pcrnoii making tlio threat, liitH, or CHUHCM the other to lielieve, Upon reiiMonahle ^roiliulN. that he luiH, pruHeiit ahility to «itl'eet hin purpose, and in oither caHe. without the consent id' the other or with sindi coiiMeiil, if it is ohtained hy fraud. (Code, Art. 258.) The following are given as examples ,if what amt>unts to an Rssault, namely : strikinjj at aiiothtu* with a caiu\ stick or the flRt, although the person striking misHos Ids aim; (1) <lrawing a Hword or liayonet, or throwing a Itotfle or glass with itiient to strike; presenting a loaded gun at a man who is within the ilis- tance to which tiie gun will carry ; (2) dis(diarging a pistol (loaded with powder and wadding) at a person so near that it might have hit him ; (3) and using tho tist in a threatening manner to the face of a person. (4) A person who presents and discliargeB a tirearm, wliitdi he knows to bo unloaded, at another, who does not know that it is unloaded, commits an assault. (5) And Article I0i» of tho Code makes the pointing of an unloaded tiivarm at another a substantive otVeiiee l»unishable l»y 81(K) fine. If a medical man unnecessarily strips a female |iatient naked, under pretence of not being able otherwise to judge of her illnesH, he commits an assault, (fi) (1) 2 Roll. Abr. 554. (2) R. V. Baker. 1 C. & K. 254 ; Osborn v. Veitch, 1 F. & F. 317. (8) R. V. ( ronan, '.'4 U. C. C. P. 102. (4) R. V. Harmer, 17 U. C. Q. B. 565. (5) R. V. 8t. George, 9 C. & P. 483. (fl) R. V. Rosineki, 1 Moo. C. C. 12. 4fi$ PKACTIOAI- GUIDE TO MAC1ISTKATK8. Any attoin|)t unlawfully to upply, directly or iiidiroctly, tho least foree to the jjei-son of uiiother will uniouiit to an UHHault. witliout any actual touching of the person assaulted. (1) Hut mere words of themselves will not amount to an assault. (2) And when the party affected consents to the act done, there is. us a rule, no assault. (3) But this rule has its exceptions. For instance, the altove Article, 258, shows that an assault may be committed upon a person, notwithstanding his consent, if such consent be obtaineJ by fraud ; and Article 2()1 of the Code provides that it shall be no defence to a charge of indecent assault on a young person under fourteen, to prove that he or she consented to tho act of in-, decency. The following are examples of what, under the above Article, would be an assault, and what, under the common law, would amount to a battery, namely : any touching or laying hold (how- ever trifling) of another's body or clothes, in an angry, revengeful, rude, insolent or hostile manner ; (4) as for instance, thrusting or pushing him, in anger ; holding him by the arm ; spitting in his face ; jostling him out of the way ; jiushing another man against him ; (5) throwing a squib at liim ; striking a horse upon which he is riding, whereby he is thrown. (6) It is a good defence to prove that the alleged assault happened by misadventure. Thus, if a horse run away with his rider and run against a man, it would be no assault, and the rider would not be puiushable, unless he were guilty of some culpable negli- gence. (7)" It is also a good defence to prove that the alleged assault hap- pened whilst the defendant was engaged in an amicable contest, as. some sport or game, not unlawful nor dangerous. (8) It is likewise a good defence to prove that the alleged assault was merely the lawful and moderate correction of a child by its (1) R. V. Shaw, 24 U. C. Q. B. 619; Stephens v. Myers, 4 C. & P. 660. (21 R. V. Langford, 15 Oni. R. 52. . ' (3) I{. V. Connolly, 26 U. C. Q. B. 320. (4) Rawllngs v. Till, 3 M. & \V. 28. (5) Bull, N. P. 16. (6) 1 Mod. 24 ; W. Jones, 444. (7) Gibbons v. Pepper, 2 Salk. 637. (8) Post. 260. ASSAULTS SEIiP DEFENCE. 46t parent, or of u sorviint by his master, or of a scholar by his teacher. (1) It is not an assault or battery to merely lay one's hand upon another in order to attract his attention, provided it bo not done in a hostile manner. (2) Nelt'-dofonoo iiKaiiiNt (a) Unprovoked, and (6) Provoked ANNault. — Kvery one assaulted, not having pro- voked such assault, is justified in repelling force by force, if the force he uses is not meant to cause death or grievous bodily harm, and is no more than is necessary for the purpose of self-defence ; and every one so assaulted is justified, though ho causes death or grievous bodily harm, if he causes it under reasonable apprehen- sion of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his ])urpo8e, and if he believes, on reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm. (Code, Art. 45.) • ,. ' ,• Every one, who has without justification assaulted an- other, or HAS provoked an assault from that other, may never- theless justify force subsequent to such assault, if he uses such force under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence of the person first assaulted or provoked, and in the belief, on reasonable grounds, that it is necessary for his own preservation from death or grievous bodily harm : Provided, that he did not commence the assault with intent to kill or do grievous bodily harm, and did not endeavour at any time before the neces- sity for ])reserving himself arose, to kill or do grievous bodily harm : Provided also, that before such necessity arose he declined further conflict, and quitted or retreated from it as far as was practicable. (Code, Art. 46.) ' 2. Provocation, within the meaning of these two articles, may be given by blows, words or gestures. (Code, Art. 46, ss. 2.) (3) (1) 1 Hawk., c. 60, s. 23. c. 62, s. 2. See also Art. 65 of the Code, under the bead, Discipline, poal. (2) Coward v. Baddeley, 28 L. J. Exch. 290. (3) For full illustrations and 'authorities, see Crankshaw's C. C, pp. 30-32. . V 458 PRAOTICAI, aUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. Prevention ol* ANNaiilt with InNiilt. — Every one is justified in using force in tlef'enee of his own person, or that of imy one under liis proiee'.ion, from an assault accompanied with insult : Provided, that h'- uses no more force tlum is necessary to prevent such assault, or the repetition of it : Provided also, that this section shall not Justify the wilful infliction of an} hurt or mischief disproportionate to the insult which the force used was intended to prevent. (Code, Art. 47.) I><>len(*i' of ^4»%'«>al»lt' Property. — Kvery one. who is in peaceable possession of anj' moveable property or thing, and every one lawfully assisting him is jttsU'fied in resisting the taking of such thing by any trespasser, or in retaking it from such tres- ])a88er, if in cither case he does not strike or do bodily harm to such tresjiasscr ; and if. after any one, being in peaceable possession as aforesaid, has laid hands upon any such thing, such trespasser persists in atteTn])ting to keep it or to take it from the ])ossessor, or from any one lawfully assisting him, the trespas.ser shall be deemed to commit an assault without justification or provocation. (Code, Art. 48.) ". •/' ! . '^^ ■ . - :■■ -^ ,'' ;:■■■:-:: '■ ■ - • " Under this article, the fact of a trespasser persisting in attempt- ing to take or keep the thing after the possessor has laid hands upon it, places the latter in the position of a ])crson acting in self- defence, as contemplated by Article 45, supra. Every one who is in j»eaceable possession of any moveable prop- erty or thing under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority; is protected from criminal responsihility for defending such possession, even against a person entitled bj' law to the jios- session of such property or thing, if he uses no more force than is necessary. (Code. Art. 4!l.) Every one who is in peaceable ))ossession of any moveable pro- perty or thing. b"« neither claims right thereto nor acts under the authority of a persoi claiming right thereto, is neither Jus^^e^/ nor itrotected from criminal rcupotisihilitij for defending his possession against a person entitled by law to the possession of such projierty or thing. (Code, Art. 50.) Uetenee of*l>wellinK Honso. — Kvery one wno is in peaceable po8.session of a dwelling-house, and every one lawfully ASSAULTS. — DEFENCE OP PROPERTY. . >- 469 assisting him or acting by his uutliority, is justified in using such force as is nocesssary to prevent the forcible Itreaking and (Mitering of such (Iwelling-liouse, either hv muht or day, l»y any person with the intent to commit any indictable otJ'ence therein. (Code, Art. 51.) '^ ■ - : ;:;■'- • J Every one, who is in peaceable possession of a dwelling-house, and every one lawfully assisting iiim or acting by his authority, is justified in using such force as is necessary to prevent the forcible breaking and entering of such dwelling-house ijy niout by any person, if he believes, on reasonable and i)robable grounds, that such Itreaking and entering is attempted with the intent to commit any indictable otfence therein. (Code, ilrt. 52.) The distinctions made by these two Articles a|)pear to be that, where there is an actual intent to commit an indictable ott'ence, necessary force to prevent the breaking and entering may be used whether it is attempted by night or by day ; but if there be merelj' a reasonable belief ihixt the l)rcaking and entering is attempt- ed with intent to commit an indictable ott'ence, the attempted breaking and entering must occur in the night time, to justify the use of force to i)revent it. While these Articles, — 51 and 52, — have reference to a breaking and entering with intent to commit an indictable ott'ence, Article 5.^, infra, deals with the case of a mere trespasser. IJc'fViK't' of Itcal ■■ro|»erty.— Ever}- one who is in peaceable possession of any house or land, or other real ])roperty, and every one lawfully assisting him or acting by his authority, is justified in using force to prevent any jterson from tresp.\ss[.\(i on such y)roperty, or to remove him therefrom, if he uses uo more force than is necessary ; and if such trespasser resists such attempt to i>revent his entry or to renu)ve him such trespasser shall be deemed to commit an assault without Justitication or provocation. (Code, Art. 53.) A a trespasser enters B's house and refuses to leave it. ^ is entitled to use f'l necessary force to remove A, but not to strike him. If, on B api)lying such necessary force, A resists, which is equivalent to an unprovoked assault, or if he otherwise actually 30 460 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. assault B, B may defend himself, overcome A's resistance, and per- sist in using the nocossury force to remove A from the house. (1) A, on entering his own house, found B there, and desired him to withdraw, but B refused to go. Upon this, words ensued between them, and A becoming excited proceeded to use force, and, by a kick which he gave B, caused hip death. A was not justified in turning B out of the house by m jans of a kick, and was held guilty of manslaughter. (2) A train conductor, who, by the use of no more force than is necessary, attempts to put off the cars a person who refuses, after being several times requested, to pay his proper fare, is not liablo, under the Eailway Act, for an assault. (3) A and his servant B insisted on placing corn in C's barn, which she refused to allow. A and B insisted and used force ; a s(;uiHo ensued, in which C received a blow on the breast, upon which she threw at A, a stone which killed him. It was held that as A re- ceived the blow in an attempt to invade C's barn against her will, and as C had a right, in defending her barn, to employ such force as was reasonably necessary, for that purpose, she was not respon- sibl* for the unforeseen occurrence Avhich hapj^ened in so doing. (4) ANM'rting^ Kl^lit to HoiiHe or litiiKl. — Every one is justified in peaceably entering in the day-time to take possession of any house or land to the possession of which he, or some person under whose authority he acts, is lawfully entitled. 2. If any person, not having or acting under the authority of one having peaceable possession of any such house or land with a claim of right, assaults any one peaceably entering as aforesaid, for the i)urpose of making him desist from such entry, such assault shall be deemed to be without justification or provocation. 3. If any person having peaceable possession of such house or land with a claim of right, or any person acting by his authority, assaults any one entering as aforesaid, for the pui-pose of making (1) 1 Hale P. C. 486; Burbridge Dig. Cr. L. 195 ; 3 Stepb. Hist. Cr. L. 15- (2) Wild's case, 2 Lew. 214. (3) R. V. Faneuf, 5 L. C. J. 167. (4) Hinohcliffe's case, 1 Lew. 161. ASSAULTS. 461 him desist i'rom such ontiy, such assault shall bo deomod to be provoked by the person entering. (Code. Art. 64.) ConiiiiOH aNMaillt. — Every one who commits a common assault is guilty of an indictable oltence and liable, if convicted UPON AN INDICTMENT, to one year's imprisonment, or to a line not exceeding one hundred dollars, and, on buhmaky conviction, to a fine not exceeding twenty dollars and co.-is, or to two months im- prisonment with or without hard labour. (Code, Art. 265.) Clause 8, of Article 842, (p. 812, ante,) enactsthat no justice shall hear and determine any case of assault and battery in which any question arises as to the title to or interest in lands or real property. And Article 864, (p. 340, ante,) provides that a charge of assault shall not bo heard and determined summarily, if, at the time of the investigation being entered upon, the person aggrieved or the person accused objects thereto. If a justice, ujion summarily hearing any cai' • of assault and battery, upon the merits, deems the ott'once not proved, or ju.stified, or too trifling to merit punishment, he shall give the accused a certificate to that effect, and if the accused obtains such certifi- cate, or, having been convicted, pays the whole amount adjudged to be paid, or suffers the imprisonment, ete., awarded, he will be released from all further or other proceedings for the same cause. (1) Afpi^ravated asMaults. — Every one is guilty of an indict- able offence and liable to two years' imprisonment who — (a.) assaults any person with intent te commit any indictable offence, or (b.) assaults any public or peace officer engaged in the execution of his duty, or any person acting in aid of such officer ; or (c.) assaults any person with intent to resist or prevent the law- ful apprehension or detainer of himself, or of any other person, for any offence ; or (I) See Articles 865 and 866, of the Code, and comments thereon at p. 340 ante. 462 PRACTICAL OUIDB TO MAQIflTKATCS. (d.) assaults any porson in the lawful oxoeution of any ]iroc!OHH againHt any lan(ln or gootlN, or in making any lawful (listrosM or seizure, or with intent to rescue any goods taken under such j»ro- cess, distress or seizure. (e.) on any day wheron any poll for any election, parliamentary or municipal, is being proceeded with, within the distance of two miles from the place where such jkiII is taken or held, assaults or beats any person. (Coile, Art. 2({S.) In the case of an assault upon a public or jieaco otiicor, the fact that the accused did not know that the person assaulted was a peace otHcer, or that he was acting in the execution of his duty will bo no defence, if, as a nuitter of fact, the officer was actually engaged in the execution of his duty. (1) A constable who sees an assault committed has the right, there- upon, and, before all danger «)f further violence has ceased to ap- prehend the oti'ender, and if the lattei*, when he is being so arrested, assaults the constable, he may bo convicted of assaulting a consta- ble engaged in the execution of his duty. (2) If a constable is assaulted while making an ai*rost which he is not entitled to make, the person whi> assaults him is not guilty of assaulting a constable engaged in the execution of his duty. (3) As to RESISTINU or WILFULLY OBSTRUCTING a public officer or a peace officer, see Art. 144 of the Code. AsMaiiltii occaHioiiiiiK; bodily harm. — Kvery one who commits any assault which occasions actual bodily hai'm is guilty of an indictable ollience and liable to three years' imprison- ment. (Code, Art. 262.) Indecent anAaultH o.j t'einalen. — Every one is guilty of an indictable otfence and lii ble to two yeors' imprisonment, and to be whipped, who — {a.) indecently assaults any female ; or (1) R. V. Forbes, 10 Cox, 362. (2) R. V. Light, 7 Cox, 389. (3) R. V. Saunders, L. R., 1 C. C. R., 75, INDIGENT ASSAULTS. 4(i.'; (fc.) does anything to any fomalo by her (•()n^sont whicli but for such cionstmt would l)o iin indecent uHHault, Huch consent being ob- tained by I'alse and tVaudulent representations as to the nature and quality of the act. (Code, Art. 259.) If, on an indictment for an indecent assault, it appears that the woman consented to the assault, under circumstances shewing that the consent was obtained by fraud, such consent will constitute no defence ; such u case being ex|)ressly provided for by subsection (6) of the above article. Where a medical man had (tonnection with a girl fourteen years of age under the pretence that he was thercliy treating her medi- cally for the complaint for which he was attending her, she making no resistance solely from the bona fide belief that such was the case, it Avas held that this was certaiidy an indecent assault, and pro- bably a rape. (1) Where, on the trial of an indictment for indecent assault, the pro- secutrix denies, on cross-examination, having had intercourse with a tliird person named to her, such person cannot be called to con- tradict her upon this answer. (2) But, if on cross-examination, the prosecutrix denies having had previous intercourse with the ac- cused, evidence may, in that case, be given to conti'adict her. (3) As to the reception of the evidence of a child of tender years without being sworn, see section 25 of the Canada Evidence Act, 1893, at p. 211, ante. In<1ecent assaults on inaleH. — Every one is guilty of an indictable otfence and liable to ton years imprisonment and to be whipped, who assaults any person with intent to commit sodomy or who, being a male, indecently assaults any other person. (Code, Art. 260.) Consent of child under fourteen no defence. — It is no defence to a charge or indictment for any indecent as- sault on a young person under the age of fourteen years to prove that he or she consented to the act of indecency. (Code, Art. 261.) (1) R. V. Case, 1 Den. 580 ; 19 L. J. (M. C.) 174. (2) R. V. Holmes, L. R., 1 C. C. R. 334; 41 L. J. (M. C.) 12. (3) R. V. Riley, 18 Q. B. D. 481 ; 66 L. J. (M. C.) 52. 464 PRAOTIOAL QUIDS TO MA0I8TRATIS. TluH Article will apply to all otlbncea, which include un indecent AHsault, committed either upon male or t'emiile children. Summary trial of aooravatid and other hkrious indict- able A8HAULT8, ETC. — Under the provisions of Article 783, (p. 288, ante), niiigiHtnitOH are emjiowored, under certain conditions, to sum- marily try, — with the accused's consent, — cases of aggravated as- sault, indecent assault, etc. ASSAULTS included IN OTIIEB OFFENCES. Ol* oll'eiic'ON only partly pruvcfl. — Eveiy count is to be deemed divisible ; and if the commission of the ottence charged, as described in the enactment creating the offence or as charged in the count, includes the commission of any other offence, the ])er8on accused may be convicted of any offence so included and which is proved, although the whole offence charged is not proved ; or he may be convicted of an attempt to commit any otl'once so included : 2. Provided, that on a count charging murder, if the evidence proves manslaughter but does not prove murder, the jury may find the accused not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter) but shall not, on that count, find the accused guilty of any other ottence. (Code, Art. 713.) Upon an indictment for assaulting and unlawfully wounding and ill-treating the prosecutor and thereby occasioning him actual bodily harm, the defendant may, by virtue of the above Article, be convicted of a common assault. (1) Upon an indictment charging that the defendant did unlawfully make an assault in and upon a girl between the ages of ten and twelve and did then unlawfully and carnally know and abuse her, etc., being the ordinary form of an indictment for an otfence against sec. 51 (now repealed) of 24 and 25 Vict., c. 100, the defen- dant might have been convicted of a common assault. (2) The defendant may also be convicted of a common assault upon an indictment charging him with unlawfully wounding and with unlawfully inflicting grievous bodily harm, although the word " assault " is not used in the indictment. (3) (1) R v. Oliver, 30 L. J. M. C. 12 ; R. v. Yeadon. 31 L. J. M. C. 70. (2) R. V. Guthrie, 39 L. J. M. C. 95. (3) R. v. Taylor, 38 L. J. M. C. 106. A8HAt:i,T8. — ATTEMI'T8. 4'{R AHHAIII.TH ON THE QUKEN. Every ono \h guilty of an iiidirtiiblo ortoiu'o and liablw to sevon yearH' iinpriHonmunt, and to bo wiiu'PEO onoo, twice or thrice as the court directs, who — (a.) wilfully produces, or ban near Tier Majcity, any arm or deHtructive or daugerouw thing, with intent to use tlie sanie to injure the person of, or to alarm Her Majesty ; or (6.) wilfully and with intent to ahirm or to injure Her Majesty, or to break the public peace ; (i.) points, aims or presents, at or near Her Majesty, any firearm, loaded or not, or any other kind of arm ; (ii.) discharges, at or near Her Majesty, any loaded arm ; (iii.) discharges any explosive material near ITer Majesty ; (iv.) strikes, or strikes at Her Majesty, in any manner whatever ; (v.) throws anything at or upon Her Majesty ; or (c.) attempts to do any of the tilings sj^ocitiod in paragraph (6) of this section. (Code, Art. 71.) ATTEMPTS. AtteiiiptN «lcfiiie4l. — Every one who, having an intent to commit an ottence, dobs or omits an act, for the purpose of accom- plishing his object, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether under the circumstances, it was possible to commit such offence or not. 2. The question whether an act done or omitted with intent to commit an olfence is or is not mere preparation for the commission of the olfence, and too remote to constitute an attempt to commit it, is a question of law. (Code, Art. 64.) An attempt is ^' an abortive or frustrated effort." (1) A bare in- tention to commit a criminal oflence is not of itself punishable ; but, in order to be so, there must be some act or acts amounting either to an actual or an attempted carrying out of the criminal intention. Thus, if A resolves in his own mind to shoot B, and openly avows it, he thereby commits no criminal oifence ; but (1) HoUoway v. R. 17 Q. B. 317, Broom's Ck)m. L. 5 Ed. 856. Ktti PIlArTICAr, (JirtltK T(t MAdlSTHATEft, wlifii lie (loi'H Moiiu'tliiiij;; III uxt'<'ution of IiIh ili'Mi^ii, and, tiirtxi^h Ihuii^ iiitci'i'iiptt'd or tliroiigti suiuc iiiit'oroHooii i'uiino iiitorvoiiiii^, ho fiillM nliiirt (if tin- iicliiul poi'iK'ti'iition of iIh' intiMulml (tHoiico, ho Ih / guilty of till iittoiiii»l. (1) An Httt'rnpt to commit iicriiiio may Ik' made hy solicitiiij^ aiiotlior to commit it. For, iim, on the one huml. a porHon in guilty, uh ii priiuipal otloiidcr, of an otVciice wliich Iio HolicitH. adviws op incitim aiiotiicr to commit, and wliicli the otlu>r actually does commit, (2) HO, on the other hand, when a person Holicits, advines or incitim another to commit an otteiice whitdi tlie other does not commit, tho uct of Holicitinjj;, advir«iiig or inciting amouiitn to an attempt to commit tln> otVeiu-e in view. (}\) In other woi'dM, one who iiiihuccchh- fully Holieits t)r advises tho commissiim of an otlence is guilty of tin uttompt to commit it ; while ono whos.' > licitution is HUcceHHful in procuring the ticttuil commisHion of an otVence is a party to its com- mission. Thus, where one wrote to a school hoy to meet him for tho purpose of sodomy, hut the boy, without even reading tho loltor, passed it to tho scliool authorities, it was held that the offonco of attompt, by solicitation, was completo. (-1) It is said tlmt an act to constitute an tvttompt must bo such uh directly approximates to or is closely connected with tho actual commission of the intondod otlence. (5) In tho application of this principle, some nice questions have arisen as to what acts, on thoonohan 1. ai'o preparations too remote to bo an tittompt, and what, on tho other hand, ai'e close enougii to the otfence to be an attempt ; it being in man}' cases, ver^'ditlicult, — some sjiy, impossible, — to distinctly detiiie tho dividing line between mere preparation for an o Hence and an actual attempt to commit it. ((i) As an illustration, the case is given of a man who, with intent to commit murder, walks to thi place where he pur- (1) R. V, Sfofield, Cald. 397, 403 ; 1 Ru88. Cr. 5 Ed. 188; R. v. Connoly, 26 U. C. Q, B. 322. (2) See Art. 61 of the Code, p. 58, ante. (3) R. V. Higgins, 2 East. 5 ; R. v. Gregory, L. R. 1 C. C. 77. (4) R. V. Ransford, 13 Cox, C. C. 9. (5) Harris Cr. L. 4 Ed. 16; R. v. Eagleton, Dears. C. 0. 515 ; 1 Rues. Cr. 5 Ed. 190. (6) 2 Stepli. Hist. Cr. L. 224, 226. ' * ATTKMI'TM. 4(i7 poHUH to coniinil i(, ThiH art of wulkin^ to llir |ilti('i> in not foiiNid ui'OfI un act Nutllci««nt to cotiHtitiito an attt>in|>t to niui'dor. (1) Hut if, lu'siduM walUiii;^ to llic plati', tlu" man were, on arrivinj^ thcri'to miHtt ami tire a jiistol nliot at liin inttindcil victim, and fail to kill him, citlici' liy missing liin aim altoiroilicr. or tlirongh llicNiiot, tliou;(h taiiint; utlbct, not [mug fatal. In- would undouhtc<lly be guilty of an attoinpt to murder. Tlu! nicro net of buying a box of matcboH witb the intention of urting them to M«'t a corn Hta( k on lire is loo remote to conHtituto an attempt to Mi*t tire. (2) liut win re the ]ii'isoner bad knelt down before a (M)rn ntack, and had ligbted a matcdi witb the inten- tion of w'tting the Htack on fire, and then be blew out the light on observing that be was watcbeil, ii was held that thin was an attempt to burn the ntack. (.'() There are deciHioiiH wbi(di have gone a long way towanlH treating I'hei'akation to cmim-mit a crime m an attempt to commit it. For iiiMtancc, the procuring of (Th'h for coining bail money has been treati'd as an attempt to coin bad money. (4) It wan fonnerly couHidered that an act done! with intent to com- mit an otVeiut* was not an attempt uidesH done under circuinHtances rendering it i)os8iblo to aocomplisb the object in view; (5) and ho whoro in an Hiiglish case, A ])ut bis hand into B's pocket with intent to steal what was in it, and the pocket bai>pened to bo empty, it was held that A could not be convicted of an attempt to steal. ((>) liut tluH decision has, recently, been overruled by the English f'ouvt of Crown Cases Kescrvod, i)resided over by Lord Chief Justice Coleridge, who, in deliverii\g ju<lgment, said, in refer- ence to the ])ick pocket case, — " This is a decision with which we are not satisfied, lleg. v, Dodd proceeded upon the same view, that a person could not bo convicted of an attempt to commit an (1 ) Per Jerv's, C. J., in R. v. Roberta, 33 Eng. L. & Eq. 553. (2) Per Pollock, 0. B., in R. v. Taylor, 1 F. & F. 512. (3) R. V. Taylor, 1 F. & F. 511. (4) R. V. Roberts, Dears. 539: 2 Steph. Hist. Cr. L. 224. [Art. 466 of the Code makes it a substantive offence,— indictable and punisbable with life imprisonment, — to purchase or have possession of coining iaBtruments.J (5) Stepb. Dig, (Jr. L. 3 Ed. 37, 38 ; R. v. McCann, 28 U. C. Q. B. 514. (6) R. V. Collins, 33 L. J. M. C. 177. KIH PItAOTK'AI. urillK TH MA<IINTKATKM. (itl'uix'o which h«' could not actually commit. \V« iiro «»t' it|)ihi(Hi that Hc^, V. Dtxhl Ih no loii^or hiw. It wart lUu'iiloil on th>< authority of i{t>^. V. CoilinH " (the piclfpookot cuHt*,) " utid tlial caHu in our fipiiiioii in no lonj^i'i* h»\v." (I) It will ht< Ki'on that th»> abovo Articio (14 ot' our ( 'ode, coincidos with lliiH hn|<ling iukI rxprt'NNly dotlarcH that an intont to coniinit an ort't«iict« coruliiiu'd witli an art doiu« or ontitttul for the purpoHoof HcconipliHhin^ lht> ohjoct in viow will coiiNtitiito nn attompt, whothor, undtT thi» cinuniHtanct'M, it was poMKihlo to i-onuuit tibo intended otlonco or not. l*lliilMliiii«'iit «>r lit! <'iii|»In (notothorwlMO oxproHsIy pro- vidoil l'(»r). — Kvcry ont" in j^uilty of an iiulictaldo olViuu'i' and liable to HHvon yoarn' impi'iHoninont who attuinptH, in any ctiHO not other- wiw providod for, to oonunit any inditrtal)lt> otlbnco for which tho puniHhiin'nt is iniprisonnu'iit for lifo, or for fourteen yours, or for any tt>rni longer than fourteon years. (Code. Art. 528.) Kvory one who attumptH to commit any indictable otlonco for committing which the longest term to which the otfonder can be Bontencod is less than fourteen years, and no express provision is made by law for the punishment of such attempt, is guilty of an indictable otl'ence and liable to imprisonment for a term equal to one-half of the longest term to which a j)ers(m committing the indictable offence attempted to bo committed may be sentenced. (Code, Art. 629.) Kvery one is guilty of an indictable otl'ence and liable to one year's imprisonment who attempts to commit any offence under any statute for the time being in force and not inconsistent with tho Code, or incites, or attempts to incite any person to commit any such otfence, and for tho punishment of which no express provi- sion is made by such statute. (Code, Art. 630) Proof* of attempt, on trial for ftill ott'cnce. — When the complete commission of tho oft'ence charged is not proved but the ovidonco establishes an attempt to commit tho offence, the accused may be convicted of such attempt and punished accord- ingly. (Code, Art. 711.) a) R. V. Brown, 24 Q. B. D. 367, 359 ; 16 Cox, C. C. 715. IIANKM AND HANK orrtriAMI. 4I\\) IUnk^, IUnkkhs, and IUnk OrrioiAhM. TheflN hy IBwnk Oltl<*l«lN.— Kvury ono In K^i'^y <>>' *" iiiiiicliililo oirt'iiio iiiitl liulilo to t'oiirtt'oii y«*arH' impriHoiiintnit, who \}v'\Uff 11 cuHliior, iiMHiNtunt t'liHliiiM*. inuiiii^or, otllfor, clerk, or mtrvitnt of liny haiiU, m- miviii^N Imiik, mttMiU any hoiid, oliligalion. hill ohll- jjiitory or ofcn'tlil.of other hill or note, or iiiiy Mueiinty lor nioiioy, or liny money or oIl'i'ttH of mucIi hunk or lodged or ile^waiteU with any Huoh hunk. (Coiht, Articio Ullt b.) It will hit Meun hy thJH Article thut the tiling tillered to ho Htolon hy II eiiNhier or other employee of u Rank may h«« eitlier unythinj^ iiEl.oNuiNu TO or unythint; nKi'oNiTBit with the Dank. ItaiikorM kIvIiik l*rnii<liil«>nl |ir<>f*er«>ii4>«»M.— It Ih emieteii, hy weetion ;»7 >>(' the Hank Act, (M Vie. c. ;{1) thai " Kvery ono in d^uilty ot' u miHilemeanor and liiihle to impriNonment for a term not exceeding two yearn who, heing the preNident. viee-presi- dont, direetor. prineipiil partner en commandite, manager, eaHhlor or other otllcer of the hank, wilfully given, or eoncm-H in giving any crwlitor of the hank, any fraudulent, undue or unfair profor- enco over other creditors, hy giving Neeurity to Huch erixlitor or hy changing the nature of his cliiim or otherwiHe howHoever, and shall further he rcriponsihle for all duinagcH HiiMtainud hy uny por- »o!) in conHe(juonco of sucli prefcrcnco. FalM«' Hank K«>por(N. — By Huction i)9 of the Bank Act, it is enacted that " The making of any wilfully false or deceptive statement in any account, statement, return, report or other docu- ment respecting the atlairs of the hank is, unless it amounts to a higher ort'ence, a misdemeanor, punishahio hy imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years ; iintl eveiy president, vice-president, dire('tor, principal partner en commandite, auditor, manager, cashier, or otiier otticer of the hank, who prepares, signs, approves or con- ciirs in such statement, return, report, or document, or uses the same with intent to deceive or mislead any person, shall be held to have wilfully made such false statement, and shall further be res- ponsible for all damages sustained by any peraon in consequence thereof." AMHuming the Tlt3r of «*Bank," etc.— It is also enacted by sections 100 and 101 as follows : " Every person 470 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGI8TRATKH. uHsumiiig or using the title of ' banii,' ' banking cumimny,' ' bank- ing house,' ' banking assoeialion ' or ' banking institution,' witli- out being autiiorized so to do by this Act, or by some otlier Act in force iu that behalf, is guilty of an otlence against this Act." (Sec- tion 100.) ■■ : ;' " Every person coinmilting an offence declared to be an offence against this Act, shall be liable to a tine not exceeding one thou- sand dollars, or to inii)riMonnient for a term not exceeding tive years, or to both, in tlie discretion of tlie court before which the conviction is had." (Section 101.) ^ ' FniNC KiitriCM um to Public* FiiiidM.— Every one is guilty of an indictable otlence and liable to fourteen y(»ars' impri- sonment who, with intent to defraud — (a.) makes any untrue entry or any alteration in any book of account kept by the Government of Canada, or of any province of Canada, or by any bank for any such (iovernment, in which books are kept the accounts of the owners of any stock, annuity or other public fund transferable for the time being in any su(;h books, or who, in any manner, vnlfuUy falsities any of the said books ; or (6.) makes any transfer of any share or interest of or in any stock, annuity or public fund, transferable for the time being at any of the said banks, in the name of any person other than the owner of such share or interest. (Code, Art. 440.) Bank Clerk lNNuiii;r FalMC <livldciid War- rants. — Every one is guilty of an indictable ott'enco and liable to seven years' ira])risonment who, being in the emploj'ment of the Government of Canada, or of any province of Canada, or of any bank in which any books of account mentioned in the last preced- ing section are kept, with intent to defraud, makes out, or delivers any dividend warrant, or any warrant, for the payment of any annuity, interest or money ])ayable at any of the said banks, for an amount greater or less than that to which the person on whose account such warrant is made out is entitled. (Code, Art. 441.) V > Bawdy House. Common IIaw<ly HouNe <lefined. — A common bawdy house is a house, room, set of rooms, or place of any kind kept for purposes of prostitution. (Code. Art. 195.) nAWKY II01SE8. — HETTINO IKiI'SES. 471 KvopiiiK <> C'oiiiiiion Baudy IIoiino. — This is an indictable oH'oiico piinislialiio with oiio yoars' iniiirisonnu-iit. And any ono who aMi)ears, acts, or bohavos as master or mistress, or as tho person having the care, government or management of any such liouse is deemed the iceepor of it, and liable to bo ])rosecuted and punished as s>U'h, although, in fact, not the real owtier or keeper thereof. (Code, Art. IKS.) If a lodgi-r let hvv apartment for the purpose of indiscriminate jirostitution, it is as much a bawdy house as if she held the whole house. (1) - . - ■ y ' It is not nocessarj' that there should be evidence of any indecency or disorderly conduct perceptible from the outsi<le of the houae. (2) The keeper of a bawdy-house maj' be a man or a woman ; and a married woman may be indicted for the otlence either alone or with her husband. (3) ; The uist of the otlence appears to consist in the allurement which tho place holds out to a miscellaneous and common bawdry corrupt- ing to public morals. Hy way of comparison and illustration, it has been said that, as an inn is for all travellers, so a bawdy-house is for all persons lewdly inclined. Generally — though not neces- sarily — it sup[>lies the girls, who nuiy either dwell in the house, or visit it witii or without the men accomiJanj'ing. for the practice. (4) evil SearcU Warraiitw. — As to warrants to search for any woman or girl inveigled or enticed to a house of ill-fame or assig- nation, see p. 123, ante. Bettino-IIousk. Cuniiiioii B<'ttiii^;-lioiiNt' dc'liiicd. — A common bet- ting-liouso is a liouse. ottice. room, or other place — (a.) opened, kept or used for the purpose of betting between persons resorting thereto and — (1) K. v. Pieraon, 2 Ld. Raym. 1197. . ' (2) R. V. Rice, L. R., 1 C. C. R. 21 ; Sylvester v. S. 42 Tex. 496. (3) R. v. Williams, 10 Mod. Go ; C. v. Cheney, 114 Mass. 281.'' i (4) Kin a V. P. 83 N. Y. 587. \ - ■ ■ ... 472 PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. (i.) tho owner, oecupior, or keeper thereof ; (ii.) any person using tho same ; (iii.) any person i)roc'ure(i or employed by, or acting for or on behalf of any Huch person ; (iv.) any person having the care or management, or in any manner conducting the business thereof ; (b.) opened, kept or used for the purpose of any money or valu- able thing being received by or on behalf of any such person aw aforesaid, as or for the consideration. (i.) for any assui'ance or undertaking, express or implied, to pay or give thereafter anj' nlon^^y or valuable thing on any event or contingency of or relating to any horse-race or other race, fight, game or sport ; or (\i.) for securing tbe paying or giving l>y some other ])er8on of any money or valuable thing on any »uch event or contingency. (Code, Art. 1<»4.) Keeping a CJoiiiiuoii Kettiii)>;-lioiiNe. — This, also, is an indictable otlence punishable with onv year's imprisonment. And any one who appears, acts "or bebaves as master or mistrciss, or as the person having tlie care, government or management of any such house is <leemod the kee]>er of it. and liable to bo prose cuted and jjunished as such, altbougb in fact not th*! real owner or keeper thereof. (Code, Art. 198.) Under the Imperial Betting- Honne Act, which has the woids, ''house, room, or other place," it was bold that the place must, be one of which the accused is or may be the owner or occu]iier, or of which he has the care or management, and that, theretoi-e, a tree in a public park, to which the accused resorted for betting purposes, was not a place within the Act. (1) But a temporary wooden structure erected during a race meeting, (2) and even an umbrella on a race-coui;ge, (3) have each been held to be a J'Lack within the Act. .. > : : ■ (1) Datrgettv. Catterns, 12 Jnr. N. S. 243. '" ' (2) Shaw V. Morley, b. R., 3 Exoli. 137. (3) Haigh v. Sheffield Town Council, L. R 10, Q. B. 102; 44 L. ,1. M. ('., 17. BETTING AND POOL-SELLING. 473 To open or koop a houao or other place for the pcbpose of bet- ting with persons resorting thereto is made an offence by sec. 1 of the Suppression of Betting Houses Act, 1853. (Imp.) ; and it has been held not necessary, — in a prosecution under that Act, — to px'ovo that money had been received as a deposit on bets. (1) ^carcliIiiK SUHpectvd BcttinK-lioiiNt'M. — (See Art. 5*75 of the Code, at p. 124 ante.) Betting and Pool-Selling. Betting and PooI-moHIiik* — Every one is guilty of an indictable ottenoo, and liable to one year's imprisonment, and to a tine not exceeding one thousand doUarw, who — (a.) uses or knowingly allows any part of any premises under his control to bo used for the puri)ose of recording or registering any bet or wagor, or selling any pool ; or (6.) keeps, exhibits, or employs, or knowingly allows to be kept, exhibited or employed, in any part of any promi.sos under his con- trol, any device or api)aratuH for the jiurposo of recording any bet or wagor or selling any pool ; or (c.) becomes the custodian or depositary of any money, prop- erty or valuable thing staked, wagered or ]iledged ; or ((Z.) rocoi'ds or registers any bet or wager, or sells any pool, upon the result — (i.) of any political or municipal election ; (ii.) of any race ; (iii.) of any contest or trial of skill or endurance of man or beast. 2. The provisions of this section shall not extend to any person by reason of his becoming the custodian or deiK)8itary of any money, property or valuable thing staked, to be jmid to the win- ner of any lawful race, sport, game, or exercise, or to the owner of any horse engaged in any lawful race, or to bets between indi- viduals or made on the race course of an incorporated association during the actual progress of a race meeting. (Code, Art. 204.) See Gaming Houses, post. See Lotteries, post. (1) Bond V. Plumb, 10 R. (Feb.) 244. 474 PRACTICAL GUIDK TO MAdtSTHATES. t MlOAMV. ■ ,' l><'fiiiif i4»ii. — iJi^nimy is — ' , (a.) tlie act of u poi'son who, heiiif/ married, got's through u form of niarriago witli any other ])oi*Mon in any part of the world ; or V (6.) tho act of a person who goes through a form of marriage /n any part of the world witli any person wliom ho or she knows to bo married ; or ((?.) the act of a person who goes tlirougii a foriu of marriage witii more than one person simultaneously or on the same day. 2. A "form of marriage" is any form either recoguizod as a valid form by the law ot" the i)lace where it is gone through, or, though not so reeogni/.eil. is such that a marriage celeln-ated there, in that form, is recognized as binding by the law of the ]>laco wliere the otfender is tried. Kvery form shall, for the pur|)08e of this section, be valid, notwithstanding any act or default of tho person charged with bigamy, if it is otherwise a valid form. Tho fact that the ])arties would, if unmarried, luive been incompetent to contract marriage shall be no defence u})on a prosecution for bigamy. ' ' 3. No one commits bigamy by going through a form of mar- riage — (a.) if he or she in good faitli, and on reasonable grounds be- lieves HIS WIFE OR HER HfSBAND TO HE DEAD ; or (b.) if his wife or her husband has been c(mtinually absent for SEVEN VKAU8 then last past, and he or she is not proved to have known that his wife or her husband was alive at any time during those seven years ; or (c.) if he or she has been divorced from the bond of tho first marriage; or ,. ' .'■. ^ ' ?^ '. ' (d.) if the former marriage has been declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction. 4. Xo person shall be liable to be convicted of bigamy in respect of having gone through a form of marriage in a place not in Canada, unless such person, being a British subject resident in Canada, leaves Canada with intent to go through such form of marriage. (Code, Art. 275.) ' BIGAMY. 476 PlliilNlinK'nt. — Kveiy ono who commits bigamy is guilty rf an indictable otteiiee and liable to seven years' imi)ris()nmeiit. 2. Kvery one who commits this offence al'tev a previous convic- tion for a lilce otl'ence shall be liable to fourteen years' imprison- ment. ((!ode, Art. 276.) Proof must bo made of the two marriages, and that, at the time of the second marriage, the first husband or first wife, as the case may be, was still alive. Proof of the first marriage, if it was celebrated out of Canada, may be made by any person present at it ; and circuiustancos should bo proved from which the jury may presume that it was a VALID marriage according to the laws of the country where it was celebrated. The first nuirriage must be a valid one. There can be no bigamy, if the first marriage was actually void. For instance, if a woman marry A, and, in A's lifetime, she marry Ji, and, then, after A's death and whilst B is alive, she also marry (.', she cannot bo indicted for bigamy in marrying C, because the marriage with B was a mere nullity, seeing that, when she married him, her first husband, A, was still alive. (1) Although a first valid marriage must be proved, it is not essen- tial, in order to establish it, that i)roof should be made of the license, or of the publication of the banns, etc. ; but the fact of the mai'riage having been validly solemnized may ije ])roved by some person who was actually present and saw the ceremony per- formed. (2) And in England, it has been held that the prisoner's own admission of a prior marriage may be relied on as good evidence to show that it was lawfully solemnized. (3) ]iut it has been held, in (Ontario, that evidence of a confession made by the prisoner of his first marriage (when unsupported by any other testimony) was not sufficient evidence upon which he could be convicted. (4) (1) 1 Hale, 693; R. v. Willehire, L. R., 6 Q. B. D. 366. (2) R. V. Alison, R. & R. 109 ; R. v. Mainwaring, 26 L. J. M. C. 10. (3) R. V. Newton, 2 M. & Rob. 503. (4) R. V. Ray, 20 Ont. R. 212. 31 476 PRAOTIOAL OmDI TO MAGISTRATES. Whore tho first marriage is not actually void, but merely void- able, there prevails a different rule to that above noticed in regard to a first marriage which is actually void ; and, where, in a prose- cution for bigamy, proof is made of a first marriage which, though voidable, has not been judicially voided, it will be sufficient. (1) Thus, a marriage contracted, in Ij-eland, by a minor without con- sent, — such a marriage being, bj' the Irish Marriage Act, voidable only within a year, — will support a conviction for bigamy, if such first marriage has not been set aside bj' the courts. (2) It is nat necessary to show that the second or bigamous mar- riage was a valid one. The above Article li75 makes it bigamy for any person, being married, to go through a form of marriage with any other person ; and sub-section 2 declares that every form of marriage shall, for the purpose of this section, be valid, notwith- standing any act or default of the person charged with bigamy, if it be otherwise a valid form. So that, after proving the defend- ant's first mafi'iago, it will be sutficieut to make proof of his having gone through a second naarriago ceremony with another woman ; and it will be no defence to an indictment for bigamy to show that the second marriage was not legal but was void, by reason, for instance, of tho parties to it being relations within the prohibited degrees of consanguinity or affinity. (3) The proof that the first wife was living when the second marri- age was solemnized may be made by some person acquainted with the first wife, and who saw her at the time of the second marriage or afterwards. Assuming that evidence is made of the two marriages, the de- fendant may not only, as already intimated, show, as a ground of defence, that the first marriage was invalid, that is, actually void, by reason, for instance, of his first wife being, when he married her, already a married woman with a husband then living, or he may avail himself of tho other defences following, namely ; — 1, Belief, on reasonable grounds, that the first wife is dead ; 2, con- tinual absence of the first wife for seven years ; 3, divorce from the bond of the first marriage ; and 4, that the first marriage (1) 3 InBt 88. (2) B. V. Jacobs, 2 Moa C. C. 140. (3) R. V. Allison, R. & R. 109 ; R. v. Allen, 41 L. J. M. C 97. BIOABIT. 477 (which was a voidable one), has been declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction. As to the defence of seven years absence of the first husband or wife, proof of this fact will entitle the defendant to be acquitted, unless the Crown make evidence showing that the accused knew of the first wife or husband being alive during the seven years. (1) With regard to the defence of a divorce obtained from the bond of the first marriage, or of a judgment voiding the first marriage, it hiis boon thought that no sentence or act of a foreign country or state could dissolve a vinculo matrimonii, an English marriage for grounds on which it would not be liable to be dissolved in England. Although the existence of such a rule seems to have been re- ferred to in the case of R. v. Lolloy, in which a Scotch divorce, — granted upon a ground which would bo insufficient under English law,— was held to be invalid, it Mpjiears that, in that case, the marriage was not only solemnized in England, but that the parties wei'o at the time of the granting of the divorce domiciled in England, and this alone, would ha''o been a good ground for hold- ing the Scotch divorce invalid in l^jugland. (2) In a later case, in which the marriage had" boon solemnized in England, a divorce a vinculo matrimonii was granted by a Scotch court upon a ground for which such divorce is not obtainable in England, but as in that case the husband's domicile was in Scotland, the English Court of Appeal held that the divorce so granted in Scotland was valid in England, on the ground that, although the marriage had been solemnnizod in England, the question of divorce was not an incident of the marriage contract to be governed by the lex loci contractus, but an incident of status to bo disposed of by the law of the domi- cile of the parties, that is to say, the domicile of the husband. (3) A divorce obtained in a foreign court may be impeached by extrinsic evidence showing that such court had no jurisdiction, or that such decree was obtained by fraud. (4) (1) Article 275 (6) ; R. v. Cargerwen, 35 L. J. M. C. 58 ; R. v, Fontaine, 15 L. C. J. 141 ; B. V. Dwyer 27 L. C. J. 20J ; R. v. Smith, 11 U. C. Q. B. 565. (2) B. V. Lolley, R. & B. 238. (3) Harvey v. Farnie, L. R. 5 P. & D. 153 ; L. R. 6 P. & D. 3a. (4) R. V. Wright, 1 P. & B. 363. 478 PRACTtCAI, (MIIt)E TO MAOIHTUATK8. Although, in tlio first part of Arlicit' 27'>, liigiimy in doHiuHJ ti> bo tiic lU't of II jHM'Hon \vl\o, lK<iii|^ miirriiMl. marrios another |)«»rHon, IN ANY I'ABT OF THE WORM), Hul»HiK't,ion 4 modifier thu luttor part of this c'hiuso hy doelaring, that ; — " No porson shall he liable to be convieted of bigamy in respect of huvin/i; ^oiie throuj^h a form of niarria/ije in a \Att(.'\) not in Canada, unless such person, being a British subjeet resident in (-anada. leaves Canada with intent to go through such form of rnarriage." Thin clause is intended to restrict, to our own juii,*dicti(m,the early words of the Article speaking of the act of marrying in any jiart of th" world, ami to thus nuike it an otience to leave Canada WITH INTENT to conuuit bigamy elsewhere ; that being the full extent of the power of the Canadian Parliament, — a colonial legis- lature having, as appears by a decision, in that respect, rendered, by the Privy t'ouncil, in regard to an Australian rarliament, no authority to legislate as to acts ilono beyond its territorial jurisdic- tion. (1) BLASPHEMY. BlaNpllcnioilN l<il»elN. — Hvery one is guilty of an indict- able oHen>'e and liable to one year's imprisonment who publishes a blasphemous libel. 2. Whether any i)articular published matter is a bla8])hemou.s libel or not is a question of law. Jiut no one is guilty of a blasphe- mous libel for expressing in good faith and in decent language, or attempting to establish by arguments used in good faith and con- veyed in decent language any opinion whatever upon any religious^ subject. (Code, Art. 170.) It is blasphemy, scofflngly or irreverently to ridicule or imp.gn the docti'ines of the Christian faith, yet any man may without incurring any penal consequences, soberly and reverentlj' examine and question the truth of those doctrines which have been assumed as essential to it. (2) (1) McLeod V. Atty-Gen., N. (•. Wales, 14 L. N. 4(t2. For full comment* and authorities on Bigamy, see Crankahaw's Cr. Code, pp. 196-214 (2) Per Erskine, J., in Shore v. Wilson, 9 CI. & F. 524-5. Br.AHI'IIKMY. — H(>l)n.Y^IN.U:aY. 479 A MiisplHMnniifl libol in Hiiiil to cniiniMt in tlio piil^lication of any |)roluiHi wohIh vilil'yiiif^ or ridiculing (iod, Jesus ("hnst, the Holy (iliost, the Old and Ni'W TcHtaniynt or ChriNtianity in gom-ral with intont to hIuk-U and insult boliovors, or to porvort or iniHUmd tho ignorant and unwary; and if a publication be full of Hcurrilous and opprobrious language. — if sacretl subjects are treated with levity, if indiscriniinate abuse is employed instttad of argument, — then a design to wound tho religious feelings of others may bo readily inferred. Hut where the work is tree from all otl'ensivo levity, abuse and sophistry, and is. in fact, the honest and temperato expression of religious opinions conscientiously held and avowed, it is not a blasphemous libel. (1) The law, as laid down by Coleridge, J., in U. v. I'ooley. (2), and as since stated by Lord Chief Justice ('oleridge in l{. v. Jtamsay and Foote, is in ort'ect tiuit the publication of any matter which has reference to (rod, Jesus Christ, the Bible, or the, Hook of ('ommon Prayer, intended and calculated to wound tho feelings of mankind or, to excite contempt and hatred against the church or religion or to jH'omote immorality is blasphemous ; but that matters couched in decent and proper language and published anil intended in good faith to advance religious opinions, which the publisher regards as true, are not blasphemous merely because their publication is likely to wound tho feelings of those who have contrary opinions or because their general adoption might tend by lawful means to alterations in religion or in tho constitution of the church. (3) Bodily In.jury. Wllfliilly or IVe|ieliK«iitly Causing Bodily In- Jury. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' imprisonment who, by any unlawful act, or by doing negligently, or omitting to do any act which it is his duty to do, causes grievous bodily injury to any other person. (Code, Art. 252.) Where it was j^rovod that the prisoner, who was nearly the first to leave tho gallery of a theatre at the close of the performance, (1) Odg. Lib. &SI.440, 441. (2) Steph. Dig. Cr. L. 97 (3) R. v. Ramsay & Foote, 48 L. T. 739 ; 15 Cox C. C. 231. 480 PRACTIOAIi (iriDE T(» MAdlHTHATKH. ran down thu rttairu and wilfully put out thu gaH and placud an iron bar acroHs tlio doorway, IhuH caitHJiig, atn<)ii|^ tho pooplu K«av- ing tho gallery, a panic in whicii Hovoral pormtuH woro Horiounly injured through thu prcHsuro of tlu» crowd, it was liold that tho ])risont'r was pn)porly convicted of wilfully cauuing k)odily iu- jurios. (1) HKKAriiiH or THK Pbacii:. It is waid, in regard to tho eriniinal law of Kngland, that " tho foundation of the whole Hywtem of criminal i)rocedure wan tho prerogutivo of keui»ing the peace, which iH aa old as the monarchy itMolf, and which waw, as it still is, embodied in the expression, ' Tho King's Peaco,' tho legal name of the nornuil state of society. (2) It may, therefore, bo safely assorted that, as all crimes, being public wrongs, tend, more or less, to atlect or disturb, directly or indirectly, the good order and tranquility so essential to the general welfare of a community, tho commisHion of an otl'enco will nearly always include or involve a breach of the |)oaco. ]Jut there are some otfencos which are directed more particularly against tho public peaco ; or in which tho breach of tho peaco is tho prominent feature, such, for example, as an attVay, an unlawful assembly, a rioi, and tho like. (3) An atl'ray (from affraier, to terrify), was by the common law tho act of two or more persons lighting in some public place to tho alarm of the public. If the tight were in private, it was no affray, but an assault ; (4) and mere quarrel- some or threatening words would not amount to an affray ; although a person, even when ho uses no actual force himself, may nevertheless be guilty of an affray by, for example, assisting at a prize fight. (5) An unlawful assembly was tho meeting together, — in a manner likely to endanger the peace, — of three or more perions for the carrying out of some common purpose of a private nature, th-^re being no aggressive act actually done. (6) When (1) R. v. Martin, 8 Q. B. D. 54 ; 14 Cox, 633. (2) 1 Steph. Hist Cr. Law, 184. (3) 4 Steph. Com. 7 Ed. 238 ; Harris Cr. Law, 3 Ed. 108. (4) 4 Steph. Com. 251-2. (5) Harris, Cr. Law, 4 Ed. 111. (6) R. v. Vincent, 9 C. & P. 91. nREAOHIH or THE PEAri. 481 tho porMonn thuH uuluwrully aHMt'iuliliKl procontlod or inovod forward to thu exuciitioii of thoir piirpoNv, hut did not go to tho point of actually i-xooutinj^ it, it was ralliMJ a rout ; (1) aiul if tin^y wtMit on to tho a«^lual cxocution of thoif purinmo, in u violent and alarming manner, it was u riot. (2) l*rev<>iitliiK lli*('n<*li ol' tho l*«'ao«>.— Kvcry on« who witm^HNoH a hrcach of tlic pcaris ih justified in intiTfcrin^ to prevent itn (;ontinuun(Ht or nMunval, and may dotain any porMon committiiif^ or ahoiit to join in or renow such lircach of thi" peaco, in order to givt^ liim into tlie cuHtody of a pcaeo otlicer ; Provided that the person interfering uses no mon^ force than is reasonably nocesHury for preventing^tho continiuineo or renewal of sueh breach of tim j)eace, or than is reasonahly proportioned to tho danger to he apprehemled troni the continuance or renewal of Huch breach of tlie [)eaco. ((/'ode, Art. .'{K.) Every peace oHlcer who witnesst-s a bi-each of tlie peace, and every permm lawfully assisting liim. is justijie<' in arresting any one whom he finds coinniiltiug such breach of thu peace, or whom ho, on reasonable and probable grounds, believes to be aboiit to join in or renew such broach of the peace. 2. Kvery peace ofllcor is Justified in receiving into custody any person given into his charge as having been a party to a breach of the peace by one who has, or whom such peace otttcer, upon reasonable and probable grounds, believes to have, witnessed such breach of the peace. (Code, Art. 39.) HlippreNNiiiK Riot. — Kvery sherift", deputy sheriff, mayor, or other head otttcer, or acting head otticer, of any county, city, town or district, and every magistrate and justice of the peace is justified in using, and ordering to be used, and every peace officer is justified in using such force as he, in good faith, and on reason- able and ])robablo grounds, believes to be necessary to suppress a riot, and as is not disproportioned to the danger which he, on reasonable and probable grounds, believes to be apprehended from the continuance of tho riot. (Code, Art. 40.) (1) 1 Hawk. P. C, e. 65, 8. 8. ! (2) 1 Hawk. P. C, c. 66, 8. 1. ' : •. \H2 I'KACTlrAI, UdlDK T<> MAillHTIlATKM. Kvt>rv ohi', wlinthor Huhjuot li» inililuiy liiw nr imt, acting in good t'uilli ill iilicilioiu'o t«> orilui-n j^ivon liy iiiiy Mlu>rirt', fU'piity sher- iff, nuiyiir or oihor lu'iul oHIcit oi'iictiiit^ lit-ud nlHcci'ot' any i-oiinty, rity, town or liiHtricI or l»y iiny iiiai^islrMtt' or JiiHtico of (ho poucu, for th<- Hii|i|>ri-.ssioii ot'ii riot, is Jiistiticii in olioying lh<> ordorK no given unleM mch onlfirs, are. manife*tly unlawful, and i« proteetiul from criminal ri'spDmilnUtji in iiHing nikIi foirc iih ho, on roaHonahIo and prohiilili' grounds, hoiiuvos to ht> lu'ccKHiiry lor rarrying into idFoct Hllcii orders. 2. it sliail !)(• a (jiu'stion of law whclhcr any [larticuhir ordor iH nuiiiil'ustly unlawful or not. (Codo, Art. H.) Every one. whothor Huhjoct to military law or not, "vho in good faith and on ivasonahiu and prohahlu grounds IioHuvoh that nuHouh mistdiiff will ariso from a riot Ih'Iovo tlioro is timo to proniro tho intoivchlion of any ot'lhc autlioritio-t afon'saifl. \» justified '\\\ using HU(di forco as ho, in good faith and on roasonahlo and prohahlu groutidH holiovoH to ho nocoHsary for tho supprossion of sutdi riot, and as is not disproportionod to tho dangor which ho, on roasoiuihlo grounds, holiovos to ho approhondod from tho continuanuo of thu riot, ((!odo, Art. 42.) Evory oiio wlio is bound by military law to obey tho lawful eom- niaiid of his superior otHcor is justified in obeying any t'omniand givon liiin by his superior otHeer for tho suppression of a riot, unless such order is manifestly unlawful ; 2. It shall he a question of law whether any particular order is manifestly unlawful or not. (('ode, Art, 43.) Unlaw fill ANNOiiikly. — An unlawful asHombly is an ftHHombly of three or more persons who, with intent to earry out any eommon purpose, assemble in such a manner or so conduct themselves when assembled as to cause ])or8ons in tho neighbour- hood of sucii assembly to fear, on reasonable grounds, that the persons so assembled will disturb tho ])eace tumultuously, or will by Buch assembly needlessly and without any reasonable occasion provoke other persons to disturb the peace tumultuously. 2. Persons lawfully assembled may become an unlawful assembly if they conduct themselves with a common purpose in such a IIRRACItlN or TIIR l>KAr|. — HfoT. 483 muiinor hn would hiivn mado thoir tixMoinlilin^ unliiwriil il' they had aHHomhU'il in tliiit inatiiu>r tor tliat piir|Mmu. 3. All Uf^Mi'inlily of iliri'c or inoro |H>rm>iiH for tlio |iiir|ioH(> of pro- ti'i'tiny \ho lioiiHo of any oii«' in llirir niiMil)«<r a>,'ainMl pfrHonH tlirratt'iiin^ to Imukk and t-ntfr Hiirli Iioiih*> in order to coinniil any indictaltio otU'iico tlu>ri<iii \h not tiidawt'ul. (Codo, Art. 7i(.) Hiul. — A riot '\H an tinlawt'ul aNHcnibly wliioh liaH begun to diNturl) tlio puaiHi tuniultuouHly. (('od(>, Art. 80.) Kvtiry ntonilKM' of an uidawful aMMiMnldy \h k""'}' "*' »" indit-t- alil(> ottoneo and lial)K> toono yt<ar'MinipriMonnu'nt. (Codt*, Art, Hi.) Kvory rioter is j^uiity of an indictalile otl'enct' and lialile to two yi>ar'« inipriMonniont witli iutrd labour. (Code, Art, H'J.) lt<>ll4llllK tlK* riot nvi, — It in tlic d\ity of every Nli(M*itr, deputy Hlieritl", Muiyor (»r (tthtu" head otllcer, and justice of tlie peace, of any county, city or town, who Iuin notice, that there are within \m juriHcliction perNouH, to the numbur of twelve or more, unlawfully, riotously and tiumiltuoiiHly asHcniblcil ti»/,?etlier to the diHturbanco of the public peace, to resort to the place where nuch unlawful, riotouK and tumult uoiiH a»4Henibly In, and ainon^r the rioterH, or iM nuar to them aH ho can safely come, witli a loud voice to command or cauHc to bo commandod silonco, and after that openly and with loud voice to make or causo to bo made a jiroclan" 'on in theso words or to the like etfect ; — " Our Sovoroign Liuly the (iueen charges and commands nil persons being asHombled immediately to disperse and peaceably to <iopart to their habitations or to their lawful business, upon the pain of being guilty of an otlbnco on conviction of which they may be sentenced to imprisonment for life. God Save tub Qkebn." 2. All persons are guilty of un indictable ott'ence and liable to imprisonment for life who — (a.) with force and arms wilfully oppose, hinder or i.nrt any person who begins or is about to make the said proclam.-tion, whereby such proclamation is not made ; or (b.) continue together to the number of twelve for thirty minutes after such proclamation has been made, or if they know t^iit its 484 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. making was liinclored us iiforosaid, within thirty minutes after Bucli hindrance. (Code, Art. 83.) If the persons so unhiwfnlly, riotously and tumultuously assem- bled together as mentioned in the nt^xt preceding section, or twelve or more of them, continue together, and do not disperse themselves, for the space of thirty minutes after the proclamation is made or after such hindrance as aforesaid, it is the duty of every such sheriff, justice and other otRcer, and of all peivsons required by them to assist, to cause such persons to be apprehended and carried belore a justice of the peace ; and if any of the persons so assem- bled is killed or hurt in the apprehension of such pei'sons or in the endeavour to api>rehend or disj>erse them, by reason of their resis- tance, every person ordering them to be apprehended or dispersed, and every person executing such orders, shall be indemnified against all proceedings of every kind in respect thereof: Provided that nothing herein contained shall, in any way, limit or affect any duties or powers imposed or given by this act as to the suppression of riots before or after the making of the said proclamation. (Code Art. 84.) ^e|i;lect of MitKisttratcfii or Other Peace Offic- ers to NupprcNN Kiot. — Every one is guilty of an indict- able offence and liable to two years' imprisonment who, being a sheriff', deputy sheriff", mayor, or other head officer, justice of the peace, or other mtigistrate, or other peace officer, of any county, city, town, or district, having notice that there is a riot within his jurisdiction, without reasonable excuse, omits to do his duty in suppressing such riot. (Code, Art. 140.) IK^eglect to Aid in SiipprcNftiiig Riot. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to one year's imprison- ment who, having reasonable notice that he is required to assist any sheriff', deputy-sheriff", mayor, or other head officer, justice of the peace, magistrate, or peace officer in suppressing any riot, without reasonable excuse, omits so to do. (Code, Art. 141.) Riotous Destruction of, or Dainai^e to Ruild- ings. — All persons are guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life who, being riotously and tumultuously assembled together to the disturbance of the public peace, unlaw- BREACHES OF THE PEACE. — RIOTOUS DESTRUCTION. 485 fully and with force demolish or pull down, or begin to demolish or pull down, any building, or any machinory, whether fixed or move- able, or any erection used in farming land, or in carrying on any trade or manufacture, or any erection or structure used in con- ducting the business of any mine, or any bridge, waggon-way or track for conveying minerals from any mine. (Code, Art. 85.) All persons are guilty of an indictable offence and liable to seven years' imprisonment who, being riotously and tumultuously as- sembled together to the disturbance of the public jieace, unlaw- fully and with force injure or damage any of the things mentioned in the last preceding section. 2. It shall not be a defence to a charge of an offence against this or the last preceding section that the offender believed he had a right to act as he did, unless he actually had such a right. (Code, Art. 86.) It has been held to be a sufficient demolishing of a house if it were so far demolished as to be no longer a house, there being only a chimnej^ left standing, and that, if any one of Her Majesty's subjects were terrified, it was a sufficient terror and alarm to sub- stantiate that part of the charge of riot, and it was also held that if pei^sons riotously assembled and demolished a house believing it to be the property of one of them, and acted bona fide in the asser- tion of a supposed right, it would not be a felonious demolition, although there would be a riot. (1) Where prisoners wore charged with having unlawfully and riot- ously assembled and with force demolished and pulled down a house and scattered a hay rick contra pacem, it was held that, upon the hy- pothesis that the prisoners had demolished the house, not felon- iously, but in the assertion of a supposed right, the indictment could be sustained as for a misdemeanor at common law, that is, for the riot with the statement of the demolition of the house as an aggravation. (2) By paragraph 2 of the above Article 86, it will be seen that per- sons who riotously destroy or damage a building cannot now reduce their offence to a mere riot, on the plea that they acted in (1) R. v. Langfofl and others, C. & M. 602. (2) R. v. Casey, 8 In Rep., C. L. 408. 486 IMIACTICAL GUIDE TO MAOISTKATES. tho assortion of a right Avhich they boliovod they had, unloss tht-y really had aiieh a right. The ett'ect of the law as it now stands seems, therefore, to he that, if the ott'eiiders or any of them actually have a right to the building, they will only he guilty oi" the riot ; but, if they have not such right, although they believe they have, they will lie guilty of the higher ortenee of riotous destruction or riotous danuige, as tlie case may be. Iiicitiii)!^ IiidiaiiN to KiotouN .detM. — Kvcry one is guilly of an indictable otl'ence and liable to two years' imprison- ment who induces, incites or stirs up any three or more Indians, non-treaty Indians, or half-breeds, apparently acting in concert — (a.) to make any request or donumd of any agent or servant of the Government in a riotous, rontons, disorderly or threatening manner, or in a manner calculated to cause a breach of the peace ; or (6.) to do any act calculated to cause a broach of the peace. (Code, Art. <J8.) (See Affray, ante, p. 440.) Breach op Trust. Ilreavli of TriiMt by Public Ofticer. — Every public officer is guilty of an indictable ofl'once and liable to five years' im- prisonment who, in the discharge of the duties of his office, com- mits any fraud or breach of trust atfecting the public, whether such fraud or breach of trust would have been criminal or not if committed against a private person. (Code, Art. 135.) CriinJiiul Breach of* Trust by TriiMtceH, etc. — Every one is guilty of an indictable otl'ence and liable to seven years' imprisonment who, — being a trustee of any property for the use or benetit, either in whole or in part, of some other person, or for any public or charitable purpose, with intent to defraud, and in violation of his trust, converts anything of which he is trustee to any use not authorized by the trust. (Code, Art. 363.) Bribery and Corruption. Bribery at Elections. — Under sec. 84 of the Dominion Elections Act (E. S. C, c. 8), it is a criminal offence to give money BIUUBRY ANlt CORRUl'TKtN. 487 or proinisi' omployinont to procure votes at a Dominion election Oi . u;ivi' nioiu'V to ohtain tiie return of any person to serve in the House of t'oninions, or to procure sucli return in conset^uence, or to advance money to be used in bribery ; and, under sec. 85, certain acts of voters are punishable as brii>ei*y. Under the new Act to dispuanciiisb votehs who have taken BRIBES, (passed at the last session), every voter is to be held to have taivi'u a bribe who, liefore wr during any election, directly or indirect ly. himself or by any other person on his behalf, receives, agrees itr contracts for any money, gift, loan or vnluai)le consi. deration, for voting or agreeing to vote, or for refraining or agree- ing to r.'frain from voting at any election, or who, after any elec- tion, directlj' or indirectly, himself or by any other person on his behalf, receives any money or valual)le consideration for having voted or refrained from voting. And voters who have taken bribes are to be disfranchised for seven years after the judge, assigned in any i)rovince to make an enquiry under the Act, has reported them to the Secretary of State. (1) JTildiciul C'orrili»tion. — i']very one is guilty of an indict- able ottence and liable to fourteen years imprisonment wlio — (a.) holding any Judicial ottice, or being a member of Parliament or <jf a Legislatui'e, corrii[)tly accepts or obtains, or agrees to accept, or attempts to obtain for himself or any other person, any money or valuable consideration, office, place, or emjjloyment on account of any thing already done or omitted, or to be afterwards done or omitted, by him in his judicial capacity or in his capacity as such member ; or (6.) corruptly gives or offers to any such person or to any other person, any su? bribe as aforesaid on account of any such act or omission. (Code, Art. 131.) Corruption of* Officers Kiuploycd in ProsecH- tinji; Oftenderis. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment who — (a.) being a justice of the peace, peace officer, or public officer, employed in anj-^ capacity for the pi-osecution or detection or pun- ID 57-58 Vic, c 14, sees. 15, 16. 488 PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. ifihmont of offenders, corruptly accepts or obtains, or agrees to accept or attempts to obtain for himself, or for any other pei-son, any money or valuable consideration, otflce, place or employment, with the intent to interfere corruptly. with the due administration of justice, or to procure or facilitate the commission of any crime, or to protect from detection or punishment any person having com- mitted or intending to commit any crime ; or (6.) corruptly gives or otters to any such otlicer as aforesaid any such bribe as aforesaiii with any such intent, (('ode, Art. 1:^2.) CORRUI'TION OF GoVKRNllENT OFFICIALS ANIJ FRAUDS UPON THE Government. (See Articles 133 and 134 of the Code.) Corruption in Municipal Affairs. (See Article 136 of the Code.) • . - Selling or Purchasing any Public Office, Appointment, etc. (St!» Article IS? of the Code.) burglary. 9Ieuiiin),[^ ol' Tt'riiiN in Kolution to ltur)>;lKr9 . (a.) " Dwelling-house" means a permanent building the whole or any part of which is kept by the owner or occupier foi- the residence therein of himself, his family or servants, or any of them, although it nuiy at intervals be unoccupied ; (i.) A building occupied with, and within the same curtilage with any dwelling-house shall be deemed to be part of the .said dwelling-house if there is between such building and dwelling- house a communication, either immediate or by means of a covered and inclosed j)as.sage, leading from the one to the other, but ncn otherwise ; (6.) To "break" means to break any part, internal or external, of a building, or to open by any means whatever (including lifting, in the case of things kept in their places by their own weight), any door, window, shutter, cellar-flap or other thing intended to cover openings to the building, or to give passage from one part of it to another ; (i.) An entrance into a building is made as soon as any part BURGLABY. 489 of the body of the ])erson making the entrance, or any part of any instrument used by him, is within the building ; (ii,) Hvery one who obtains entrance into any building by any threat or artifice used for that purpose, or by collusion with any person in the building, or who enters any chimney or other aper- ture of the building PBEMANENTFiY left open for any necessary pur- pose, shall be deemed to have broken and entered that building. (Code, Art. 407.) Where a servant boy of the prosecutor always slept over his brew house which was separated from his dAvelling house by a public pas.sage, but occupied therewith, it was held, upon an indict- ment for burglary, that as the brew house was used by the prose- cutor's servant boy for sleeping in, it was the dwelling-house of the prosecutor ; although, being sei)arated by the passage, it could not be deemed to be part of the house in which he himself dwelt. (1) A burglary cannot be committed in a tent or booth in a market or fair, even although the owner lodge in it : becau.se it is a tem- porary, not a permanent edifice ; (2) but if it be a permanent building, although used for the purpo.se of a fair, it may be a dwelling-house if a part of it be used as such during the fair. (3) PiiiilNlinicnt of Biirf^lary. — Every one is guilty of the indictable offence called burglary, and liable to imprisonment for life, who — (a.) breaks and enters a dwelling-house by night with intent to commit any indictable oflfence therein ; or • (b.) breaks out of any dwelling-house by night, either after com- mitting an indictable offence therein, or after having entered such dwelling-house, either by day or by night, with intent to commit an indictable offence therein. (Code. Art. 410.) " Ni'/ht " is the interval between nine P.M., and six A.M., of the following day. (Article 3 (q.) of the Code.) The intent to commit an indictable offence ought to be charged ; or it will be necessary to prove the commission of some indictable (1) R. V. Westwood, R. & R. 495. (2) 1 Hale, 567. (3) R. V. Smith, 1 M. «& R. 256. 490 PRACTICAL OUIUR TO MAGISTRATES. offonce in tho Iiouho iiftor the ])ivakinf^ and entorini^. Tims, where an intlietnu'nt was tor bur^lari()U!sly Itroakin^ iuu\ entering a dwelliug-houHO and then and there stealing goods therein and it omitted to state tho intent, it was heUl that the defendant might be eonvieted of tlie iiurglary, if the stealing were proved hnt not otiierwise. (1) , Both a breaking and an entering are neiessary to eonstitute bnr- glary ; and the breaking and ontertng must both be in the night. If the breaking be in the day and the entering in tho night, or the breaking in the night and the entering in the (hiy, it will not bo burglary ; but the breaking may be on one night and the entering on another ; (2) jirovided the breaking be with intent to enter, and the entering with intent to commit an indictable otfence. (3) Every entrance into a house, in the mvture of a more trespass is not suttioient. Thus, if a n\l^.\^ steals in a house which ho enters by a door or window which lie finds open, or through a hole or o^jen- ing which was nuule there before, (unless it be such a permanent opening as a chimney etc., as mentioned in Article 40'7 (b) ante,) he will not be guilty of burglary. (4) Hut see Art. 415, p. 4!K^, post, as to being found in a dwelling-house, at night. There must bo either an actual breaking, oi' a Ineaking by CONSTRUCTION OF LAW, as wliore the entrance is obtained by some threat or artifice, or by collusion with some one in the building, as provided by tke second sub-clause of article 407 (t) ante. Ai'tliul break 111 jf. — Where a cellar window, which was boarded up, had in it a round aperture of considerable size, to admit light into the cellar, and through this aperture one of tho prisoners thrust his head, and, by the assistance of the other pris- oner, he thus entered the house, but the prisoners did not enlarge the aperture at all, it was hekl that this was not a sufficient breaking. (5) The following are some examples of burglarious breakings. (1) R. V. Furnival, R. & R. •14.=>. (2) 1 Hale, 551. (3) R. V. Smith, R. & R. 417 ; R. v. Jordan, 7 C. & P. 432. (4) 4 Bl. Com. 22.-), (5) R. V. Lewis, 2 C. & P. 628. BUROLARY. 491 Mukini^ a liolo in the wall ; forcing oju'ri thodoor ; |»iitting back, picking or opening the lock with u f'alwo key ; breaking the window ; taking a pane of glass out of the window ; putting back the leaf of a \vin(lf)W with an inntrument, drawing or lifting a latch ; turning the key where the door is locked on the inside ; or unloosening any other fastening which the owner has provided. (1) It has been held, and it is expressly declared by Article 407 {!>) ante, that the breaking requisite to constitute a burglary is not contined to the external part of the house, but may be of an inner door after the otfender has entered by means of a part of the house which was open. Thus, if A enter the house of B in the night time through the outer door whicli is open, or by an open window, and, when within the house, turn the key of a chamber door, or unlatch it, with intent to steal, this will bo burglary. (2) C/OllNtrilctiv(> nroakiil{r, — Where, in con.sequence of violence commenced or threatened in order to obtain entrance to u house, the owner, either from a|)preliension of the violence, cr in order to repel it, opens the door, and the thief enters, such entry will amount, in law, to breaking. (3) Where an act is done, in frn^Klem leyi's. the law gives no benefit thereof to the party. Upon this |)nnciple, the getting possession of a (lwelliiig-hou.-*e by a Judgment of ejectment obtained by false alfldavits, without any color cf title, and then rifling the house, was ruled to be within the stiitute against breaking into the house and stealing the goods therein. (4) So, if a man go to a house tinder pretence of having a search warrant, or of being authorized to make a distress, and, by these means, obtain admittance, it is. if done in the night-time, a sufficient breaking and entering to con- stitute burglary, or, if done in the day-lime, house-breaking. (5) If admission to a house be gained by frand, though not carried on under the cloak of legal process, but morelj- by a pretence of business, it will also amount to a breaking by the construction of (1) 1 Ha]e,.Vi2. (2) 1 Hale 5.W (3) 2 East P. C. 48fl. (4) Farre'aCase, Kel. 43. (5) Gascoigne's case, 1 l.eacli,284. 32 492 I'HACTICAI. UIJIDB TD .MAOINTIIATBH. liiw. y\('C()P(liii<;ly, wlicm nnww |h'1'hoiis took lodijjiiifjs in a Ikhihc, iuhI iil'liTwanlH, at iiiy;lil, wliilo I lie pcojilc were at prayfiH, roldtcd tlu'in, it WUH ti>iiwi(lfn'(l thai, the ciitraiHf iiiln tho iioust^ JH-iiig gainod hy fraud, witii an inli'iit to ri)ii, I In- oUciuc was Imrg- lary. (1) I<llltrilil4*«'. — Any, ovon tho least entry witli any jiart ol' the olVendiM's hody or with any jiart of any instinnienl or weapon Uhod hy him is snUicienl. (2) So thai, wliei'e A. in tlie niijht-tiine, ont ii hole in tho window sluiltei's of \Vh sliop, whieh waw part of his dwellin^^-honse. an<l, j)ntting his hand thnuigh tho holo, took ont some watciioH whieh linng in tho Hho]>. within his roacdi, it was held to he hniglary. Qi) The Intent. — There must ho un intent to commit some in- dictahlo otfenee : and if tho iiitontion of tho entry he alleged or ho proved hy tlie I'vidoneo to liavo been only for the pnrposo of eoni- mitting a more trespass, tho olfeneo will not hi' hnrglary. (4) The ItoRt ovidonc'o of tho intent is, tliat the defen<lant aetually committed the otfenee alleged to have lieen intended l»y liim ; (f)) hui any other fuets may bo given in ovidoneo from which tho intent may bo presumed. lloiiNt'-hmikiiifJi;. — Hvery one is guilty of tlie indictable ottbnco called house-breaking, and liable to fourteen years' im- prisonment, who — (o.) breaks and enters any dwelling-house by day and commits any indictable otfenee therein ; or (6.) breaks out of any dwelling-house by day after having com- mitted any indictable otlenco therein. (Code, Art. 411.) Every one is guilty of an indictable otfenee and liable to seven years' imprisonment who, by day, breaks and enters any dwelling- (1) 1 Hawk. P. C, c. 38, s. 9; 4 Bl. Com. 227. (2) See Article 407 (b) ante. See also R. v. Davis, R. & R. 499. (3) Gibbon's case, Fost. 107, 108. (4) R v. Knight & Roffey, 2 East P. C. 610. (5) See R. v. Locost, Kel. 30. liUKAKINO HIIDP. 498 li(niH(> with intent to commit any iii(li(!tiil»li' oIVoiipo thoroin. (Codo, Art. U:i.) ltr«>illiliiK Nliop. — Kvory ono is guilty of an iiniictalilt* otVciicc iiiid lialild to lourtccii years' im|)risonmeiit wiio, eithei' iiy (lay or iii;^lil, hrcaivs and ciilv-rs and commits any indictable otleneo in a Hcliool-liouse. slioji. wareliouso or eonntinf^-lionne, or any l)nildini; witliin tiie ciirtilai>'e of a dwejlinif liouse, l)iit not ho eon- neeled t liei'ewit li as to I'oi'in part <d' it under the provisions lierein- itet'ore {'ontained. (('(tde. Art. Hi^.) Kvery one is ^nilty ol' an indictaiile otlfnee and lialilo to seven years' iniprisonmcnt who, i^ither l»y day or iiigiit, breaks and entorH any of I lie iniildinf^s mentioned in the hist jirect'ding soetioti with intent to commit any indictaiile otlence therein. (Code, Art. 414.) Kntekimi oil Heino Foi'ni) in a Dwem.ino-house at Xiout. — Mvery one is gnilty of an indictable otlence and liable to seven years' imprisonment who unlawfully e.ntkus or is in a dwelliiig- houHe, by night, with intent to commit an indictable offence. (Code, Art. 415.) Hkino Found Ah.mrh With Intent to Hiieai^ a Dwelling, etc.— This ia indictable and )>uinshable by seven years' imprison- ment. (Code, Art 41(i.) Havino Possession ok Hurolars' Tools, or Beino Disguised. — This is indictable and puidshable by five years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 417,) llr«>akiii)[; Plaot* of WorNliip. — Every one is guilty of an indictable otlence and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment who breaks and enters any place of public worship and commits any indictable offence therein, or who, having committed any indict- able oltbnce therein, breaks out of such place. (Code, Art. 408.) Kvery one is guilty of an indictable otfence and liable to seven years' imprisonment who breaks and enters any place of public worship with intent to commit any indictable olt'ence therein. (Code, Art. 40!t.) Upon an indictment for breaking into a parish church, and stealing two surplices and a scarf, it appeared that the surplices 494 I'RAfTICAI, OtriDE TO MAniKTIlATIS. and fiOiirf wore stnU'ii t'n>m a liox kept in tin- cliiinli liiwi-r, Imilt lii^lior lliaii the ('l)un-li, ami having a soparali' roof, hut no oiitur door, the only way ot'/j;nin^ into it licin^ tliron^^li the Imdy dl' the tliurtli, iVoin wliicli tlu' towiT waM not M-parati'd Ity ii ddor or partition. It waH olijootod that tlio stealing of tlitw* urticloH dopoHitt'(| in tho tower wum not Hacrilc^ti, lint it was held that a tower, circuinHtanc't'd an this tower wan, niUHl lie taUeii to he jtart of the ehureli, and that tlie Htualing therein wuh a slealin/^ in the church, (1) Canada Tkmi'kiianc^k Act, (See Intoxicatino LiQL'oR, /)0«^) t Canned (i<ion8. NIllllipiilK or lialM'llillK.— Kvcry packa^-e of canned goods sold or ottered for sale in ('aiiada, for consumption therein, must he Icgihiy lahelled with the naint' and address of the person, Hnn or compaiiv hy whom the same was packed, or of the dealer who sells or otl'er.'i it for sale; and every such package containing goods prepared from ju'oduets previously dried must, in addition, ho lahelled or stamped with the woni 'soaked." A violation ol' any of Uicse provisions is punishahle summarily hcfore a justice o\' the jieace. hy a penalty for a first otVeiicc of $2 foj'cj.'li such package, and for a suhsequent otleiice hy a penalt}' not exceeding Sli(» and not less than $-1 for each sucii package. FalN<> fill boiling. — For placing on any package any lahel. hrand. or mark falsely repi'escnting the date of the packing of tlie goods llierein, or falsely re[trc.si'nting the (nwuitily or weight of its contents, to the extent of throe por cent, or more, the penalty is $2 for each sudi package. The expri'.ssion '-iiackage" means every can, tin, or package in which articles or goods are ])ul up for sale and whi(di are closi'd hy heing heriuetically sealed. (2) (1) R V. Wheeler, 3 C. & P. 58.-). (2) R. S. C, c. 105. OAI'AOITV Knll CHI.MK, — CATTLK. 405 Cai'acmty kok Ciumk. A tliild widiiii I lie a;^t' nl' sovi'ii is cniiNidcrtKl wil limit any caparily lo disccni riifht I'nuii wrmij;, ami is mo cniicliisivtdy pi'OHUiiicd In lie iii('a|)al)l« i)|' ci-iiiic tlial lliis |irt<Muin|iti<in cannot l»o rulMittcd Hclwt'cM tilt' aj^cs (if seven and lomiccn there is still a |>i"<'siiin|>- lioii, lint only /^r/mr/ /<irv>, lliat tlie (diild is incajialile, lliat is, the presiiniption is one wliicli may Ih" relmtted liy clear and eomhisive ovidunce ol'actnal capacity ; (I ) and. tlicrclnre. when a child he- tween scM'ii and loiii'tccii is chari^ed with an olleiice, it mnst he proved not only tliat the (hild coinndtted the act. hnt that iii> did if with a i;nilty knowledge of wroii;j;(loing. {2) (Sue l.NSA.MTV. //U6t.) Catti.k. MH'illillU; 4'af f l<>.— 'I'his is indictalile ami piinishahh* hy 14 years' inipi'isoiniicnt. (Code, Ai't. .'{;{l.) This article iTicrs to live cattle. ^I'he htcalin^' of a dead cow or any |iarl of it would he pnnishahio hy seven years' iniprisonmoiit, under .Vrlicic M.'»(i of the ( 'odo. " CatI le ' includes any horse, mule. iiss. swinc, sheeji or f^oat . ami any neat cattle nr animal of the Imvine spiM-it's, and a|)plies»to oiu; animal as well as to many. (Cdde. Art. ',UI.) Wilfully desti'oyiniy; or damaging cattlo is also ininishahle by li yeai's' ini])ris()nMiont. (Code, Art. 4!>t)i«.) A person who kills any animal included lu the ahove detinition ol' cat tie, with intent to steal its carcaso, skin, otc, is guilty (under Art. .'{I)") of stealinu; it.iind punishahle (under the above Art. 'S.'A ) by 14 years' imprisonment. Attempts and written threats to hill or injure cattlo are punish- able by two years' imprisonment. (Code. Arts, 500 and 51)2.) (Soo Cruem'Y to Animals, ]>. 512-515, ;)os^) ' (1) H. V. Owen, 4 C. & P. 'J3(i; li, v. Groonibridge, 7 C. &. P. 5S2; 4 Bl. Com. 2:$. (2) Coile, Articles 9, 10, 4'l(i CK.VOrK.'At, iintDK Ti» MAdlHTIlATBH. ( 'EKTI'iII \|((, (8i'i' |i|i. ;jriti-;t.'ii», ante.) Cm vi.i.KffdK m PiiiiiT <iiiill<>ii}l'iii|i; |4» l<'lKlif H 4lii<>l. — l-lvory unc \h guilty <>{' an indiclnlilf iiircmc timl liiilili' l<> iIutc yrarn' iiMprij^miiifiit wlio cluillcii^'i's i>v »'ii(|('iiviiiirH liy any iih'iuih to provoUo any pcrHini to Wfihi a <ltu'l, or ciKlcavoiirH |o jirovoUo any {tormtii to chalU'iigo uny otliiir pci-Mon NO to do. (('odo, Art. !i|.) A diu'l is wIm'I'c two iiiM'MoiiH ll^lit widi deadly woupoiiM and by pn>vioiiM niiitiial aificrnicnl . It' in suidi a li.i^lit one ol'llic com- butants kill, (be otiicr. \u' will \>v guilty of nnirdcr ; and tlio HccondH of botli coinbalantrt and all pn'Hcnf giving coiinlonaiifo to tho tranMaction (including uvon Jbc surgi-on), will also lit> ('(jually guilty of Ibal oH'cnci'. (1) (St'c Piti/.K FidiiTs, post.) ClIKATINtl AT I'l.AY. Kv«!ry oii(> is guilty of an indictaMo otlonco and liable to lliroo yoars' inipriNonnicnt wlio, witb intent to defraud any person, clieats in playing at any game, or in bolding tbt« stakes, or in bet- ting oil any event. Tbe Inipi'rial statute 8 iV !> Viet. c. !()!», s. 17. treats ami punishos cboating at play as an obtaining by false pr»'teneeH » ■ > '" Child. ('iiriiiil I4ii4»u l«'4lu^<' 4»r 4iiil4lr4>ii I^ii4l4'i* F4»iir- t('4'll. — Tills is indietable and punisliable b}' iinprisonnuMit for MFB and wiiifPiNO. (('ode, Art. 2(!!>,) And an attonipt to com- Tllit (be otlelice is indietable ami pllllisluible by two ykahs" ini- prisoiinient and wihi'IMNo. (Code, Art. L!7tl.) IJiidor section 5 of the lini)erial Act, 48-4i» Vic, c, (J'.l, it is a mis- doinoanor to carnally know u girl between the ages of i;{ and 16. And it has been i-ecently held that it is not a eriininal otl'enco for n (I) U, V. Young, 8 C, & P. 044; U. v. Barronel, Dears. 53; K, v. Cuddy, 1 C &K. 210. . ^ V _ ■ . , , .-,...,. . ;..,. ciiiMi. 407 ^ii-l, Itftwfi'ii l.'t tiinl !<!, to ui)l ikiid uhot ii inulo poi'Mnu in tin* cori) iniHHioii i){' llii> iiiiHilt'infiiiiDi' of liuvin^ cunukl ruiiii< ctioii witli lu<r, or to Holicit uikI iiicitt* a iiitili> porNiin to coiiimit ilic nit'i'tni' u|>i)h hor. (1) <'iiiimIiih; » 4*IiII<I*m 4l4'iilli b.^ IVlKlifniliiH; II.— A person wliu wiH'iilly IVij^lilcii-t a thilil or hIcU person |u dciiHi in guilty of ciilpiiMc iioniiciilc. (Code, Arliclfs 2l'0. '2\i'A.) ('llAHTIHBMKNT oK ('llll.H. (Sl-i- DIHrll'MNK, /JO^r) KlIJ.INO UnHoHN CiIII.K. (HoO AHOIITION, fln/<?,) Nkoi.bct To Maintain (Jiiii,!). (St'c maintknanck /wa<.) . NIoiilliiK 4'lill4l iiii4l4'r r4»iirl4'4>ii. — KvciT one is guilty of an indictal)!)' olVoiice and lialiic to sevt'ii years' imprisonment wUn.u'iih intent to (Iffnirn Ht\y parent or ^'nanlian, or other person Imvinji^ tiie iawlnl eiiaru;e, td" any <dnld, undir I lie af,'e ol' fourtfen years, of the possession of su(h thild, or with intrnt to utial any article alioiit nv on the person oCsueh ehiid, unhuvfnlly— (a.) takes or entices away or detains any sn( ii < hild ; or (A.) receives or harhours any such c hild knownuj it to have heen dealt with as aforesaid. Ii. Xotliinii; in this section shall extend to anyone who f^ets pos.session of any (diild, claimin^^ in ^ood faith a right to tho posseNsion of the ehild. (('odu, Art. liS-t.) A woman was held riy;htly eonvieti .1, upon evidence that the ehild, having Incn placed hy its mother in the prisoner's service, was afli'rwarils missing, and conid not he discovered, and that tho woman had i^ivcn dillei'ent aceonnls of what iiad heeome of tho <diil(l. hnl ini|(lying that she had given her to some thii'd party, allhon^li lliei'c was no evidence that she still possessed Ihechilil. In an .American case it was held that, where a wife leaves her hushand. taking her two-year old tdiild. and is aasislc<l. in leaving him, liy another person, ami tho ehild, aftor such sepafation, eon- linnesin the custody and under the v ..irol of the \\\\\\ — the irmnoii (1) R. V. Tyrell {Ihrmit^r, IW).'}], 10 R, March, (1894,) 212. (!.') H. v. .lolinson, 15 Cox, ('. ('. R., 481. 4!)S PRACTICAI. (UTDE Tl) MAUISTRATES. SO assisting Iut in leave Iut liushaiid is not ,ij;iiilty, of milawf'iilly taking ami rarryiiifj; away tlio cliild, which the molhcr (iniitiiuu's to retain in hec vnvi.' and possession, (1) ciin,i)iiiKTir. (*Oll4*<>llllll<>lll ol'hirlll. — I'lvery one is guilty of an in- dietalik' oll'ence. and liahie to two yeai's' iinpfisDnnient. who (/(V/Jwes of the dea<l hody of any ehild in any manner, with intent to conceal the fact (hat its ntotlier was delivered of it. whether tlio child died liefore, orilnring. or after hirth. ((^ode. Art. 240.) The more denial of'tlic hirth is not suilicient to convict. Thoi'o nuist he )ivoof of some act of disposal of the hody afti'r tin* child's death. {■!) In order to convict a woman of attempting ti) conceal llu' liirth of her child it has heen held that a dead hody must lie found and idenlilied as that of the child of which she was delivered. (.'!) ^'4'Ki«'oliii;>; !<» olilaiii aMMiNliiiKM' in <*liil«ll»ir||i. — l']vi'ry woman is guilty of an imlictaMe olfence who. with eiilu'i" (d" the intents liert'inafter mentioned, hcing witii child and heing aliont to lie delivered. negh;cts to provide reasonahle assistance in her delivery, if the (dnld is ]ier]nanently injured thendiy. or dies, cither Jnst hefore, or during, or shortly after hirtli. unless she ))roves that such death or permanent injury was not caused liy siudi neglect, oi' hy any wrongful act to which she was a p.'irly, and is liahlc to the tollowing puni.ihmont : (rif.) If till' intent of such neglect be that tin- child shall not live, to imi)risonment i'or life ; (6.) If the intent of such neglect he to conceal the fact of her having had a child, to imprisonment foi- seven years. (('(kIc, Art. 23!>.) " CHINESE I,y.MI(iKAT10N, No vessel carrying (.'hinese immigrants to any port in Caiuida shall carry more than one such immigrant for every tifty tons of (1) State v. Anjrel, (Kan. 8npr. Ct.), 11 Cr. L. Mag. 7S8. See also C. v. Myers, S. C. 2:5 Atl. Rep. KU; 14 Cr. L. Mag. 252. (2) H. V. Turner, 8(\ (S; P. 7o5. (3) R. v. Williams, 11 Cox, 684. CIIINKSK tMMI(H{ATl()N. 4!1!) its toniiag-o. i'onalty, for ovciy Chiiu'sc iinmigTiiiit cjirriod in t'xcoss of I his luiiiilK'r. $50. (1) I'lvcry |)('rsi)ii of ('lnMi'S(M)ri^in sliiill pay into tlu' CoiisolidattMi Itovoniu' Kmid of Canada, on t-nteriii^ Canada, a duly of S')0' But nicinluM's of tlu' Di|)loniati(; Corps or oliirr ^'ovcrnnu'nt ropro- scntativi's. (licir siiilc and their servants and consuls and eonsuhii' ajj,H'nts are t-.xenipt from tliis payment ; and so are tourists, mei'- ehants. men of seienee and stu(h'nts. iiearint;,- eerlitieates of identity' speeifyiiii; t iieir occupation and t lieii- oiiject in eomiu<^- into Canada and endorsed \>y a British Consul at the place of the irranting- of sucli certiticate. {'!) l-'iVery mastei of any vessel, who lands or allows to 1)0 landed any Chinese immii^rant l)efore payment of thi' ahove duty, is liable to a penalty not exceeding- .1?1,0(M), and not less than I?')!)!), and to imprisonment not exceeding twelve months in default of payment ; and the x'essel will lie forfeili'd to Her .Majesty. ('^) No duty is payaide in respect of any woniau of ( 'hinesc oi'igin who is the wife of a )km'soii not of Chinese origin: hut. for the ]iurj)o.so of the Chinese. Imminrdtion Act. such wouuin is deeim^l to ho of the same nationality as her hushand. (4) I'ersoiis of < 'hinest' origin may pass through Canada iiy I'ailway, in transitu from one port or place out of ('anada to another port or place (Hit of Canada, without payment of entry dues, provided that HUidi ])assage is imide under regulations of the Minister of Customs. (•''0 A Chinese person, who wilfully evades or sittempts to evade tiio provisions of the Chinese Imnwjration Aet. as ivspeets the payment of duty, by porsomiting an)' other individual, or who wilfully' makes use of any forged or fraudulent certiticate to evade ihi- ])rovisions of the Act. and everyone who wilfully aids and ahets any sucii Chinese ))crson in any suidi evasion im' attempt, is guilty of a mis- (1) K. S. C, c. (17, sec. 5. i2) lb., sec. S. (3) lb., sei\ l(i. (4) 50-51 Vic. c. 35, sec. 1. (5) 50-51 Vic. c. ;!5, sec. l'. 500 I'liAcrrcAf, niiDK ti» maciistkates. (lomeaiii)r iiiid liiilik' to im|M'is(mMU'iit not oxcooding twelvo montlis or to ii HiH' not fxcei'din^ S'»00 or to both. (1) Ah to cortiliciitcs to ("liiiicso k-iiviiiif Canada and intending to ivturn, wo soc. i;5 of tlic \t. S. ('. o. (!7. All actions to iTcovor diitit's or ])i'nalties uiidor tlio Chinese fmvn- (jration Act and nil prosiJcutioiiH thoreundor for otfenecs not therein declared to be misdemeanors are triable before one or more justices of the peace luiviiig jiii'isdiction where the cause of action arose or the otfence was committed. (2) COMBINATIONS. C'oiiihiiintioiiN ill ItoMlraiiit of Trade. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictaiiie otleiuH' and iiaiib' to a iienaity not exceed- ing four thousand dollars and not less than two hundretl dollars, or to two years' imprisonment, and, if rt corporation, is liable to a pen- alty not exceeding ten thousand dollars and not less than one " thousand iloilars. who consjjircs. combini's. agrees or arranges with any other per.s(ju, or with any I'aiiway, steamship, steamboat or transportation company, iinlaicfulli/-- (ci.) to iniduly limit the facilities i'or trans])orting, pi'oduciug, manufacturing, sup])lying, storing or dealing in any article or commodity wbieh n>ay bo a subject of trade or commerce ; or (6.) to restrain or injure trade or commerce in relation to an}' such article or c<^mmodity ; or (''.) to unduly prevent, limit, oi- lessen the manufacture or pro- duction of any smdi article or conunodity. or to unreasonablj' enhance the |)rice thereof; or (f/.) to unduly prevent or lessen competition in the i)roduction. numufacture, purchase, barter, sale, transportation or supply ot any such article or commodity, or in the price of insurance upon person or jtroperty. (Code, Art. 520.) It is the policy of the law to encourag*^ trade and commerce; and it is against public ])olicy and illegal to enter into a combina- tion or agreement for the purpose of restraining trade, or tending (1) R. S. 0. c. ()7, sec. 17. (L') K. S. C. c. 07, sec. 21. COMBINATIONS. — COMPOUNDING OFFENCES. 601 to take it out of the voiilins of fonipetitioii ; ovoii ulthough it may not appear that tho coml'iiiatioii or agreomoiit hiia actually \n'o- (lucod any result detrimental to public interests. (1) An as.sociation of mannfaeturers of wire eloth, formed for tho avowed j)urpose of rejujulating the j)riee of the commodity, eacl\ member stipulating, under a lieuvy penalty, not to sell at less than a specified rate, was held to be contrary to public policy and illegal. (2) The defendants, (who were shipowners), agreed that, if persons in a certain trade would deal witli them, exclusively, such j)ersons. should have certain advantages at their hands, and that if they (le;dt with any other shipowner, to however small an extent, they should lose all the advantages which they would derive iVom deal- ing with defeiulants. The plaintiffs, (who wore also shipowners.) alleged that this was done for the purpose of injuring them by driving them out of the trade. But the defendants said it was done for the ])rotection of their own trade. Held, that the ques- tion would bo wh'ch oflhe.se two views was in fact, true. (3) Compounding Offences. . ' ;' C'oiii|>onii4liii}>^ |>«'iial uctioiiN. — Kver^' one is guilty of an indictable otl'ence and liable to a tine not exceeding tho penalty comjxjunded for who. having brought, or uuiier colour of bringing, an action against any person under any ))enal statute in order to obtain from him any penalty, compounds the said action without order or consent of the court, whether any offence has in jact been committed or not. (("ode. Art. 155.) C'Oi*rii|»tl,y Taking; lltMvard lor Ilt'l|>iii}>; to Bto«*ovc'r Nt4»li'ii Property. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable otlence and liable to seven j-cars' imprisonment who corruptly takes any money or reward, directly or indirectly, under pretense or upon af count of helping any person to recover any (1) Santa Clara, V. M ci L. Co, v. Hayes, 70 Cai. 387; Atcheson v. Mallow, 43 N. Y. 147. (2) Ue Witt Wire Cloth Co., v. New Jersey Wire Cloth Co., 14 N. Y. Supp. Rep. 277. (3) ]Mognl Steamship Co., v. McGregor, L. R if), Q. B. D. 476. ./ , 5()2 PiiArricAi, (H ide m ma(iistiiates. clialtol, money, valuable security or other propei-ty which, hy any indictalile oll'encc. has liei'u stolen, laUen. ohiaiued. extorted, con- verted or disposed of, unless he has used all due diligence to cause the otl'ender to he hrouglit to trial tor the same, (('ode, .\rt, 15(5,) 1 iilawl'iilly iHlv«'rtiMiii{i^ It4'wiii*«l tor Koliirii of Klolcil l*l'op«'ri,v. — i'lveiy one is lialilc to a |icnally of two iiundi'i'd and fifty dollars for eacii oHeiice, I'ecoverahle with cosfs liy any person who sues for the same in any coui't ot' corn- jiotent Jurisdiction, who— (a.) puhlicly advertises a reward for l,he return of any properly whi(di has hcen stolen or lost, jind in such advertisciuuit uses any words i)ur|)ortinii" lliat ni> (Hiestions will he asUed ; or (6.) makes usct of any words in any puliiic advertisement pur- porting that a reward will he givi'U or paid for any i)ro|)erty Avliich has heen stolen or lost, without .seizing or maUing any in(|uiry alter the per.son ))rodueing such property ; or (r,) pi'omiscs (>)• (lifers in any sucdi puMIc advi-rliscment to re- in I'u, to any ]iawnlii'oker oi' other person who has advaiictd money ly way of loan on. or has bought, any pi'operty stolen or lost, the nuiney ,so advanced or jiaid. or any other sum of money for the return of su(h ]n'operty ; or ((/,) prints or puhlishes any such advertisement, (Code. Arl, 157.) On the suhject of comjionnding otl'ences, Ai'chhold cites a num- ber of eases, (1) Amongst them is one in whicii the plaintill's, a local lioard. had indicted tlie defendants for ohstructing a high- way. At the trial a con>i»romise was luade hy the partit's and sanclionod hy the Judge, and afterwards ccmtirmed hy deed, Hy this deed the di'tendants co\enanle(l to restoi'c the road wilhin seven years, and the plaintiffs covenanted that, when that had heen done, they would consent to a verdict of ■' init guilty" on the indictment. The defendants failed to restore the road, and the lilaintiffs tl)eu hronght an action (mi their covenant. Ilelil, hy the (1 ) R. V. Burgess, 55 L. J. M. C. 97 ; R. v, Gatley, K. & R. 84 ; R. v. Crisp. 1 B. ct Aid. 28-.'; R. v. Best, 9 C. & P. S68; Keir v. Leeman, 13 L. .1, (Q. B,) 359; 15 L.J. Q. B. 300, ele. COMPULSION. ' 503 Court of A|)|iciil. that, as tlic iiidictim-iit wan for u public inju7y, llio a^iToiuent to couseut to a vordict of ''not guilty" was illegal, and that thu i)luiiitirt'H I'ould not maintain ;v;i accion on the dofutid- aiits' covenant. (I) ■ So that, wlu'ii an otfcncc, — oven if it ho not very serious, — is ono of a public nature, tiie compromise of a prosecution l»ased upon it will lie illegal ; Imt if the ()tl'ence is of a light duiracter and ono whi(di miglit bo nnide tho subject of a civil action, such as a common assault or a libel, an agroeinont to witlidraw the prosecu- tion will lie legal ; but where the ])ublic charact'.'ristic of the of- fence predominates, as, in the casi of an assault and riot com- bined, an agreement to compromise the prosecution would be illegal. Compulsion. 4'oiiipiilMion hy TlirctifM. — Kxcept as hereinafter pi'o\ide(l. compulsion, by threats of immediate death or gi'ievous bodily harm from a person actually j»resent jU the commission of the otl'ence, sludl be an excu.se for the commission, — by a person sub- ject to such throats, and who believes such threats will be executed, and who is not a party to any association or conspiracy the being a party to which I'enderetl him subject to comitulsion, — of any ottence other than treason (as detined ni paragraphs a, b, c. d and e of subsection one of section (iT) of the Code), murder, ])iracy, offences ile< nu'd to be piracy, attempting to murder, assisting in rape, forc- ible abduction, robbery, causing grievous bodily harm, and arson. (Code. Art. \2.) C^^4»Jll|»lllMi<»il l».V Foi*c«'. — Although the law will not I'xcus'- the commission of any of the above excepted olTences, — such as murder, piracy, rajie. ar.son, — done under compulsion by thivats even of immediate death, it will be ditVerent with a person who is not a free agent physically, but who is s\ibjocted, — not to threats ojterating on liis mental faculties, — Itut to actual ))hysical force exercised without or against his consent by a third party ai the time of the act being done. If A, by force, take the arm of B, va which is a weapon, and il) Windmill Loc. E. of Health v. Vint, 45 Ch. I). 351. r-,'V $>,'■ •'•"* r'tACTICAI. 01 IDK Til At All ISTIIATKS. Ilifivliy kill (;, A is yiiiil^- ot .minlcr, not M,; (1) lor H, in tliin iiislanco, is as iinwitlin^'ly (In- inst niiiicnt of A iih if he woro iiiiiiiiniito oi- unconscious ; ami liis own will lias nolliini,' al all to do witli the act, wliicji is as exclusively tlio act of A as if the weapon wi-rc in the hitter's hands instead of in \Vh. <'oill|»ulNi4MI l».y XoveWNlly.— Till' law of necessity is paranionnl over all other laws ; and it has hreri well said that every law of man has in it the ini)ilieil i'xecptioii, whii h is of the Hame force as if exprossod, that obedience shall not he requirwl when it is inipossihle, and that an act which is iinavoidahle \h no crini '. (2) And, as everything wldch is necessary for a man to do to Hjive his liff is treated as coin|)elied, it follows that if I am attacked hya ruffian who seeks my life, 1 may kill him if I cannot otherwise })reserve my own life. (3) A i*c i? swimming in the 8ea after a 8hi]»\vrock, get liold of a plunk not large enough to s\ipport hoth, A puslu's otf B, who is tlieroby drowned. A coniniits no crime. (4) A doctor kills a diild in the act of hirth as the .)]\]y way to save the life of tlic mother. The doctor is justified. (5) CoilipillNioil of WilV.— Xo presumption shidl be made that A married woman comnvitting an offence does 8o under coin- ])ulsi<m because she commits it in the prosoncc of her huwband. (Code, Art. 13.) CONSI'IRACY. Ooiii^iTMi Definition. — A conspiracy is an agreeing or combining or confederating together by two jiersons (not being man and wife) or more than two persons to accomplish some unlawful purpose, or to accomplish a lawful purpose by some unlawful means. (G) (1) 1 Ru88, Cr. 5 Ed. 139. (2) R, V. Diuinett, 1 C. & K. 425. (3) 4 Bl. Com. 183. ' (4) Bacon's Max. No. 5; Burb. Dig. 38. (6) Steph. Gen, V. C. L. 77. (0) R. V. Rnnn, 12 Cox, 316-339; R. v. Roy, 11 L. C. J. 93. CONSI'IHAOY. 505 TIitM'()iiiI)imiti()ii Jn'iiif^ tliti ifint n\' {\w otVonoo, ii conmpiiiicy is (•()in|)li'U) as Hooii us (ho coiisiiiriilnrs ('01111)1110 and a^i'cc tD^ctlu'r, although tho conHpiniey hu» not Imcii actually carried into ctl'cct. (1) A conspiracy consists not in llic moro iViYen^/on of two or more, hut ill the (ii/recment of two oi- more, to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act hy unlawful means. So lony; as sutdi design n^sts in inf nit ion only, it is not indicdiide. (2) As a conspiracy must, from its nature, lie l»y two persons, or more, one iiiai' alone cannol be ti'ied and convit'ted of it. unloss ho ho indicted for conspiriiii; with other persons to the Jurors un- known ; or unloss ho ho charged witii having conspired with others who huvo not ap])earod, or who are since dead. (3) The a(;ts and declarations (d'aiiy of the conspirators in further- ance of tho common d(;sigii may he given in evidence against all of thoni. But hoforo ovidonco of tho acts of one conspirator can bo given against tho others, tho existence of tho cniis|(irHcy must bo ju'ovod, and that tho act in question was an act <lone in furthorunoo of tho common design. (4) C.'oiiN|»ira<>y iii KcNtraiiil of' Trade. — A conspinicy in restraint of trade is an agroement lietwoon two or moro persons to (h> or procure to bo done any unlawful act in restraint of trade. (Code, Art. 516.) What ActN ill KoMlraiiit of Trade arc not Uii- lawf'lil. — Tho purposes of a trade union are not, by reason merely that they aro in restraint of trade, unlawful, within the meaning of tho next preceding section. ((!odo. Art. 517.) The expression " Trade Union "' moans such combination.whothor temporary or permanent, for regulating the relation between workmen and masters, or for imposing restrictive conditions on (1 ) R. V. Thayer, 5 L. N. 1()2 ; Horaeinan v. R., 16 Q. B. (Ont.), 542 ; Hey- manii v. li.,li Cox, 383. (2) Mulcahy v. R , L. R. 3 H. of L., 300-328. (3) Hawk 0.72,8. 8; R. v. Kinnersley.l Str. 193; R. v.Niclioll8,2Str.l227 (4) H. v. Sheliard, 9 C. & P. 277 ; R. v. Blake, 13 L. J. M. C- 131. 5U(J I'RACTU'AI. (M'IDK Tit MAUISTIIATK8. the fohduct of iiiiy tnuli- <>r IniHincsH. as would, Iml for tliiH Act, huvo hern dooiiit'cl to lie an utilawt'iil (•oiiiltinalion Ity roasoii of •omo OIK) or inoiv of iIh purpoMi's Itcin^' in rontraiiif of (nuUi, (Sue. 2 of" The Trade. Unions Art:' \l S. C, c. 131.) ProN«>('iiiioii lor Tru<lt> t'oiiNpirtivy.— \o |>i-os«(ii tion simll bo iiiaintaiiialilo against any prrson for conspiracy in rcfusini^ to work witli or for any employer or worUnian, or for doini; any ficMir cansin^' any rir/ to lie done for the purpose of a trade coniltination. uidess such act is an qlfence puiushahle by htatnto. (Code. Art. r)18.) Where the defendants, who wore nierniiers of a traih' union, con- spired together to injure a non-unionist workman, hy depriving him of ids employment, it was hi'ld to he a misdenieanoi", and not for the ]iurpo.ses of their ti'ade combination, wiiliin the meaning of the law. (Ij Mt'tiiiiiiK of ••TrtMl<' <'4Miil»iiiatloii ** and •• A«*l.'* — The cxpi'i'ssion " trd'le. lonihiiuitiun" means any combination be- tween mastt'i's or workmen or other persons for regulating or altering the relations between any pcr.sons being masters or work- nu'U. or the conduct of any nnister or worknmn in or in respect ot' his bnsii\i'ss oi" cmplo_\rni'nt. or contract of employment or si^rvicc ; and the expression ■■itct" includes a default, breacdi oi- omission. ^Codo, Art. r)l!t.) See CII.MHINATIONS IN RKSTIt.MNT OK Tll.VDE. p. 500, ante. C'oiiNpii'iiiK <o l»riii}( a l<''alN«' A<'4'iiNa(ioii.— Every one is guilty of an indictable otfencc who conspires to pro- secute anj' person for any alleged oiVence, knowing such person to be innocent thereof, and shall be liable to the following puidsh- inent : {it.) To imprisonn\t'nt for fourteen years, if such person might. upon conviction for the alleged ollence, be sontenced to death or imprisonment ibr life ; (6.) To imprisonment for ten years, if such person migh* upon (1) K. V. Bunn, 12 Cox, 31C-3'10. OONHl'IKAOV. 507 0()iivictii>n t'lM'lli^ uHi^^ihI otloiKto, bo Hoiitoiicod to impriHoiuiunil lor any term lens limn lilV. (Code, Art. 152.) 4'oiiN|»iriiiK lo 4'oiiiiiiil an liidl4*l»l»l«'4lflVii«M>.— I'lvery oim is guilty of tin imlicitiiblo otVeiiei* ami iiahltt to noven years' iini>i'iHonmi'nt, who, in any caMo rud Imreinhef'oni [jroviiled for, c'oiiHjiire.s with any itcrson to eununtt any uuliutahlo oll'enco, (Code, Art. 527.) <'4»iiN|»irln)C to ll«>l*ruild. — Hvery one is guilty of an indictable ott'enee and liablu to Hovon years' imprisonment who con- spires with any other ptsrson, by doeoit or falsehood or other frau- dulent means, to defraud the public or any person, ascertained or unascertained, or to atl'ect the public market, pricre t)f slocks, shares, mcrchandiso or anything else publicly sold, whether such deceit or falsehood or other fraudulent means would or would not amount to a false prett'iise as heivinbeforc delined. (Oodc, Arl. ;{'J-t.) Tho following are examples oi conspiraciea to defraud : A conspiracy to impose [tivtcnded wine upon a man as and for true and good I'ortugal wine in oxchango for goods (1) ; A conspiracy to defraud tho public by moans of a mock auction, — that is, an auction witli sham jjiddors, who pretend to be real bidders. — for the purpo.se of .selling goods at prices grossly above their worth (2) ; A conspiracy to injure a man in his trade or profession (3) ; A c()nsj)iracy to raise, by false rumors, the price of public funds A conspiracy, by tlie promoters of a joint stock company, to ciicat and defraud, by means of fal.so pretences, those who might buy shares in the company (5) ; A conspiracy by persons to cause them.selves to be rei)utod men of property, in order to defraud tradesmen (6) ; (1) U. V. Macarty, 2 Ld. Kaym. 1179. (2) R. V. Lewis, 11 Cox, 404. (;i) R. V. Eccles, 1 Leadi, 274. (4) R. V. Aapinall, 46 L. .1. (M. C.) 150 ; R. v. DeBer»snger, 3 M. & Sel. 07. (5) R. V. Aspiiiall, 45 L. J. (M. C.) Iu9 ; 40 L. J. (M. C.) 145. (0) R. V. Roberts, 1 Camp. 399. 33 BM I'ltAi THAI, uniliK I'K M AtllsTH ATKS. A (niispiriity ti> <l('rnuitl hy int'iinMot' hiUo n^iuvMoiitatiniiM nf llii« Holvoncy nl'a ImnU <)folln>r mcrraiiliK' t'slulilislinu'iil (I) ; 4'4»iiM|»lrii«',> l4» liilliiihltilo a l<«'tclMliiliir4'.^ (Si'ti Arlicli' TO uT ilic ('(»(!«.) CONTItACT, <'l*illlilltll l»r«Ml«'ll«'W 4»r 4*4»lliril4«i.- Il ift ilH nllclUO, |»miisliiililc, — oil iiiilictiMi'iit, or un siiiiimiiry imii\ ictinn In lure two JiiHtirt's, — liy, (as to pi'i'Moiis), a |)fiially of i;?l()(M>, or ;j ihhmiIih iiii|ii'isoniiu'iil. witli or \villu)ii( liard lalioiir, iiikI by. (as lo iniinici |iiil coi'iMiralioiis. I'Ir.;, a ju'iially of ?<l(MMl. and liy. (as lo railway i-oiii|iaMirs) a jiciially of ii^illO, — |o wiifiiily lircak a contract Uiiow- in^ or liaviii^' ri'as()iial)U' caiiMo to ln'licvc that siidi lii'i'acii will (n.) cii(laii;i;i'r life or |>ro|HM'ty, or {h.) (|i'|irivc tlic inlialiitaiits of a city or placo of tiicir supply of powor, lii,'lit, ^as or water. oi' (^c.) delay, or prevent the rimiiiiig of any loconioti\e, eni;i ih' oi' lender, or any IVoi^ht or passeiii^er train, or cur, on a railway curr^ini;- tlii' mails, etc. (Code, Art. 521.) Kvery such municipal corporation, authority, or company shall cause to he posted up at their works or railway stations, as the case maybe, a ])rinted copy of tiie above section. I'eiially, for default, $21) per day. I'enalty, for unlawfully injuring, defacing or covering such posted copy, $10. Contagious Diseasks. See The Animal Contagious Diseases Act, R. S. C, e. ()!). And see p. 133, ante. Co-Owners and Co-Paiitners. Tlicl't hy Owiiern, 4^o-Oi«n«'rN and l*arlii«>rN. — Theft may bo eommitted by the owner of anything capable of be- ing stolen against a person having a special property or interest therein, or by a jiorson having a special property or interest tliere- in against the owner thereof, or by a lessee against his reversioner, or by one of several joint owners, tenants in common, or partners of or in any such thing against the other persons interested thei-e- (1) R. V. Esdaile, 1 F. & F. 213. (Mtlti'nilATtOMJ. — COl'NTKKFMTtNd. ft(l!» ill, or liy lilt" (lii'crinrH. piiMic owners nr hh'ihIu'in of a |iiil)li(' com- piiiiy. or liody forporiilt', or of an iiiiiiiforporuliMl lioily or nocioty associiitt'd loi^.'llicr I'or any lawful purpose, a^'aiiisl siieji pnlilie eoiiipany or liody corporate or iiniiiL'urjioraleil hoily or Moeioty. (Code, An. .'{ll.) Tlie olleiice is iiidiital>le and piinislnihle (iin(U>r Art. ;{.')<; ol ||io Code) l»y Novon yourn' imprimmnuMit. t'oiM'caliiiu; 4Jol(l or Mil«4>r with liil«>iit !<» lie- IViiiiil I'lirliicr ill .Hilling 4 III i III. -Kvery one eom inilH theft wlio, with intenl |o defraud liis co partncu', eo-iidveii- turer. joint tenant or tenant in eoininon, in any niininif elaini, or in any share or iiiler(»st in any sindi I'hiiin, seeivtiy Ueeps liacU or conwals any fj;old or silver found in or upon or (aUeii frotn sindi I'liuin. (Code, Art. ;J12.) This is iiidietalile and punishahle (under .Vrt. ;151 of the (Vtd(>) liy two years' iin|>risoiinient. ('OKIMIH.VTIONS. ('or|M>rtilioiiN iipix'iir by .iltorii<>,Y.— A corporution against wiioin an indielinent is found shivll ajipt-ar liy attorney ; and no writ of certiorari is necessary to i-eiiiovt^ siudi indictineiit into any Superior Court so as to compel the corporation defendant to plead thereto. ((!ode, Articles »!.{r), ti'.M.) On the tinding of an indictineiit against a c()r|)onition, a notice to |ilead shall he served upon such corporation, for whom, — in case of default to appear and plead, — a plea of '• not guilty" may he ordered to he entered ; and whether the corporation has ajipeared and pleaded, or a plea has been so entered for it, the trial may proceed in its ahsence. (Code, Articles OHTlliiS.) CoUNTEIlKBITrNd. l>4'liiiitioii. — Counterfeiting is the making of false or spuri- ous coin to imitate the genuine. A genuine coin prepared or altered (for instance, by gilding or silvering it"), so as to resemble a coin of a liigher denomination, is a counterfeit coin ; and a coin fraudulently filed or cut at the Bl(» I'HArTirAl. liViur. to mauIhthatrh. Otl^eN NO UN to n>tnov(* tlic lllillill;^^ ami on wliidi ii new inilliii^ Iium Ikm'ii iiilili'tl to rcKtort< tli*> ii|i|it'ui'iuii'<t ol tlii> coin, in uIho u coiiritci'' t'tMl coin. (Cotlc, Art. ItlD.) Wli<>ii 4lfr4>ii4M> Im <'»iii|il«>to.~Kvci-y olVciico oi'nntliin^ an>' cniintfiMcii coin, or ol' Iniyin^', Hcllin^'. receiving. |ia)in^, Icndcrin;^'. nllcrin^. or piitlin^ ol)', or ol' oHorin/i; lo Imy, ncII. roc'civc, pay, nllcr, or |Hit oil', any connlorluit coin Ih (locnn'ii to Im (■oni|>ict(<, althoHijIi the. ''oin ho nnnlc or ci'nntcrr<Ml(<i|, or lion^'lit, Nolil. received, paid, Icndcrcd, uttcrc(| or put oil', or olVcrcd lo lio lion;;'lil, Hold. I'cccivcd, paid, tendered, ultereil or pnl <dr, iins not in a fit state to he uttered, or thr countertrit lliei'i-of iraa not finiaheil or perfeete'l. (Code, .\rl Mil.) 4'oiliil4'i*lVif iiiK 4'4»liiM. «V<'. — KvtM-y on(> In ^niilly (d' an indictalil(< oU'ence and liaMe to imprisonment tor lite \v'lio-~ (ri.) nniUes or hegiiis to niaUo any counturreit coin re.sembrmK. or apparently intt'nded to icsemlde oi- pass I'or, any cnrreni gold or silver coin ; oi* (/'.) gilds or silvers any coin rosemltling, or apparently intended to reseniMc or pass for. any enrrent gold or silver coin ; or (('■) gilds or silvers any piece of silver or copper, or of coarse gold or coarse wilvt-r, or of any metal or mixture of metals r»'spec lively. InMng of a lit si/,e and tignre to lie coined, and with intent that the same shall he coined into coiinterf(*it coin resemhling. or apparently intondeil to reseinhle or pass for. any current gold or Bilvor coin ; or (<l) gilds any enrrent silver coin, or tiles or in any manner alters 8n( h coin, with intent to make the same resemhic or pass for any current gold coin ; or («.) gilds or silvers any cnrri'iit copper coin, oi- tiles or in any manner altci's such coin, with intent to maUe the same i-csemhle or j)ass for any current gold or silver (oin. (Code, Art. K!2.) As to the ottences of Dkai.inu in and imimirtinu coiinterkeit COIN, MaMUFAOTI:RINO OOPI'ER coin ANO IMI'ORTINO unciihrent .OOPPBR COIN, KXI'ORTINO COUNTERKKIT COIN, t^l.IIM'INd (M.RHENT noM) OR 811- VER roiN. Defacing current coin. I'ohsehsino cur- rent COIN Clill'l'INO.*, Po88ES8IN(l GUI NTERKEIT COIN, CoKNTKRFEIT- coi NTHiKKirrNO. oil INti noi'MKK ('i)ivM, ami Mvkinu ii\mk rtiiKiuN (hhnh, m<o ArtiolM 'i<;;i. ii;i, iiir>, oim, ii;!i, i7i». 171. iti' uml 17:1 •>!' iIm> ChIk. AihI hh to llic MaIsINU ok INMTIlliMBNrs FnU r'UNlNU llinl till' hlll.NKINli UV UOININll INHrillMKNTH INTO ('.\IVAI>A, HUO Al'liclxM tdll Ulnl I'i? ot'tllO <'.h|.-. Al»VKIlTIHIN(( CoiJNTKIlK'Ktr Mi»NKV. — (Mw |), l.'IH, ante.) NllM|i4'4*l«'4l 4'4»lil illll,! Ill' I'lll. -Ciiiii li'iidi'i-i'il iiH nir- rctil )Xi>\i\ 1)1' hIKi'I' ciiiii iiiiiy, it' miimimtIciI tn Im^ iliniiiiis|ii>i| nr id Im* cniMili'rri'it, III" (III. Ik'iiI III* limki'd liy tin- |k>iniiii to wlium it is li'iiili ri'ij ; ami il' il in i|iiuiiiiH||(-i| or coiiiilrrt'i-it, tlio pio'soii liMiilxr iii^ il nIiiiII Iii'ui' I III' loss; liiit, il' it lu* ^ooil (•oiii. tlio |m>inoii ciitliii^. Iii'iiiliiii^ III' lii'i'aUiii;^ il nIiuII riM'i'ivii ii at I In' rah- I'ni- wliiili il will ruiiii'il. Any ili^^imlr as lo wlirtliri- nucIi cnin is iliiiiiiiislii'il or riiiiiilcrri'il shall Ih> siiinitiai'ily Iricil liy u JiiHtici.) of tim |inii'c. (I{. S. C. c. 1(17, hit. 2(1.) Noiy.iir** 4»f' lliilimriilly .Yluiiiirii4>iiir4>4l 4»r liii. |M»rl4'4l 4'4»|l|M>r 4'4»ill. — (Sr>< !{. S. ('. I'. t<i7,ss. 2<)~;M.) I ll4'l*lllU; €'4»lllll4'rf'4'il 4d4»l4l 4»l* NI|V4'I* 4'4»illM, — This is iiiiliclalili' ami |miiis|ialili' l>y 1 I yi-ai's' iiin»i'isoiiiin.i|it. (('.hI.'. ,\ri. 174.) WhiToa ^oimI sliilliiif; was IiihhIoiI to a .li-w hoy lor IViiil. ami he pill il iiilo his iiioiil II. iniih'i' |tri"t«Mmo III' tryiii<; it. aiul. lln'ii, (iiisli'ail oj' llu'i;;oo(i shilliiii; hainli'il to hiin). ho look, oiil uf his moiilh.a had sliiijinjf. wliirli In- luimh'il lo iho pi'iisiTiitor. sayiim il was mil <^oo(|, this (which is oiu' of lliciiioilos of riiiijiiii^ iho (dian^os) was hclil lo he an iiIIitIii^ of I In' bail shilling. ( I ) il is an • iillnrin/uj ami putting of." as well as a ' tonili'ring," if (In- coiiiili'rfi'il I'oin lu' ollrrcil in payniriil, tlioiiifh it ho rol'imoil hy thi' pursoii to whom it is olU-roil. (2) l'li4'l*lll}( KK'^^ 4'4»illN« ^l4>4llllN r4>M4'lllbllll|{^ ciir- r<>ll( 4'4»iiiM, «'l<*.. — This is imiiclahio ami |iiiniHhaliiu hy throe years' impriNoiinieiit. (C'odo, Art. 475.) (1) It. V. Franks, 2 houdi, 7;?fJ. ,' (2) U. V. WelBli, 20 L. J. M. C. 101. r)l!i I'llACTK \l. Ul IliK 'I'd MAOISTIIATKS. IJIt«'riiiu: llf'ltMM'll <'oiii.— This in |)(iiiiHlial>l(' siniiniiirily lii'lorc I \v«> JiiMliccs, I III' |)riiiilly ln'iii^f ItMi dulliirs. (Ootlc Afl . 17t<,) l'tl4'riii({ iiiinirroiil 4'4>|»|»4'r 4'4»iii. -'IMiis is piin isliiil)l(' s\iMiiiiiii'ily, I lie |ii'nally licirii^ ijoiihlc I lie iioiniiiul viilur >>{' tli(( iilt(^r('(l cdiii, or t!ij;;lil days im|ii'is.iiiiiH(iit, in (li-taiilt of puy. iiiciil. ((^)(l(f, Art. 477.) l*lllliMlllll(>lll ilfilT l*IM'%'ioilM f .>IIVi«*ti4»ll. -A jit'r- HoM, ('(iiivictcd nl' 11 riiiiiaii'c (illciicr al'lcr a pn^viinis ciMivictidii, is iialilc, ((I.) Id iiii|ii'isdiiiii('iit tdi' lil'c, if, ddii-rwisn, fdiirt(U'ii years would liuvo \)wn tlio loii^rfst leriii, (/a) lo loiirUuiii yoars' iiiiprisou- inerit, if, otiicrwiHc, sovcii years would have Ix^cn the loni^csl ((^riu, iiriii, (n.) to s(!V(Mi yca.'s' iiMprisdiiiueiil, il', otlierwist!, ]\^'. would not liavc! Iiecii liaiili^ to scvt-ii years. H(!t'or(i the prisoner has pleaded guilty or hisen found /fuilty of the suhst!(juent (>Hene(!, t he previous convielion cannot lie /^iven in evidence. (1) CRUELTY TO ANIMALS. . , I'lvery one is j^uilly of an oU'encc! and lial)l<!, on summary convlc!- tion hefore two justices of tiio p(^uce, to ii penalty not e.xeeediiig fifty dollars, or to three months imprisonment, with or withouc hard labour, or to hoth. who — (o.) wantoidy, eruelly or umiec.ccssarilij heals, IiIikIh, illtreats, abuses, overdrives or tortures any ealthi, poultry, dog, domcHtio iniinal or bird ; or (<».) wliilo driving any cattle or oilier animal is by nfv/%enre or iU-US(i(ie in the driving thereof, the means \vherel»y a'ly iniHchief, dariiag(! or injury is done by any Hueh cattle or other animal ; or ('•.) ill any manner encourages, aids or assists at the fighting or bailing of any hull, bear, badger, dog, cock or other kind of animal, whether of donu'slie or wild nature. ((Jode, Art. 512.) lOvery pecuniary penalty recovered, with respect to any Huch ottence shall be ai»j)lied in the following manner, that is to say ; one moiety thereof to the corporation of the city, town, village. (!) Art. (170 of the Code ; R. v. Martin, 39 L. J. M. C. 33. CRUKI.TV TO ANIMALS. " i'tl.'S iovviisliip, piii'isli (If pliUHi ill wliicli (lu! ofVciKM- wiis comiiiilltil. ami tho oilier iiioifty, vvilli Cull (m)mIs, to lli<! pornoii wlio iiironnnl and pfos.Tiited lor tlic Kami', or to hucIi otlu'f poi'Hoii as to t liti jiistici^H of the praii- sci'iiis proper. (K. S. (!., c. 172. h. 7.) 'I'lii' cruelty piinislialile iimler tin; aliove Ai'ticle is (riieityto callle. poultry, <lo^s, (lomestie animals or hirds ; aii<l il lias lieeii lield til, it lizards or American ciiameleons are not domestic animals. This was till! holdini,^ of rulice .Mai^istrate Dii^'as of Montreal, in vofiisiiiL!: a warrant upon an int'ormation (diar/fiii^ cruelty to six lizards, (ollercd lor salt; as pet ornamontH iiiiil toys with rini^s last- <'iied round their necUs to wlii<di chains and pins were attached), hy depriviiii; t hem id' t heir nat iiral^ and propter food, hy exposing them to cold, liy coiiliniiii^ them in pajier hoxes. and hy depii\in^ lliein ol' t heir natural and accustomed warmth and sunshine. (I) A doiiieslic animal is one whi(di has liceii lamed fur I he servico of man ; and it. has iiceii hcliriliat lions k(!p(- in a ea/^e are wild animals l<e|it, in eonliiieiiienl, and iiotdomeslic animals wiliiiii llm Vruelti/ to Aniinali Acta, lS-t!». (ss. 1'. 2!)), ami iSf)-!, (h. 3), (lm|».) (2) ■- Willi ret^anl to the meaninu; of Uus wordw, ^^ wanton " ami " cruel" any act. whi<'li is iiii|iistilial)le__liy Iho (■.ii'ciiiiiNtances. is wanton ; and cniolty exists wlieiiever the animal is Hiihjected to unnecessary pain or sutVeriiig. IJiit I ho luoro inlliotioii olHotne hodily pain will not, oCitsoir, (M)iistilule the ottonco. Thcro muHt \w not only some ill-iisaii;e, Iroiii which , the animal HiilVers, hut tlit! ill-usagd must lio witiioiit nuy wcessili/, aclualiy cxislinjL^ or hoiioHtiy hulit'vod to exist. (^3) Tin; most common case to which tho law would iipply in tluit in which an iinimal is cruelly hoiiton or torUirod for tho more pur- pose of caiisiiiif pain, or I'drMho gratlHcalion of u malignant or vindiclivo temper. The mere incoiivenioiico and discomfort attciidiiiit upon tiietrans- portiition of animals hy rail or_ hy water, docs not constitute cruelty. Andji'siirgcon who pori'orins, upon an aiiinud, sonic oper- ation wiiich^he honestly lioliovos to he of beiiellt to it, will he giiilly (1) iSoc. for Prev. Cruelty v. Grnetz. 17 L. N. 74. (2) lliir|jer v. Mareks, 10 K. Aug. {18!»l) ;«)(). (3) Budge V. I'arsons, 7,.!... T. 18-1 ; Swan v, SuunderB, 60 L. J. M. C;.;07. 514 IMlACTIOAr, OUIDK T(» MA(USTIl.\TKS. of no ofl'onco, iiiidci' tho iibovo Article, iiltlioiiu'li Iho pevformaiico of ilic o|)criili()ii miiyciius(* tlicaniinul sfveri' piiiii uiid sulfL-riiiif. (1) Xor (loi'H tlio law intorft'iH* with llu' infliction of any ciuislisc- mcnt which may ho noccssury foi- tlic traiiiini;- or discipMnc of animals. A man may also pi-otccf himself ami his pniiierty a^'ainst tin; inti'iisions of miscliievoiis and vicious animals. And so where a facniei-'s |)ivmises wcm-c niyhtly invatk'd hy somo animal and his hen's nests hi-ohen up, and lie set in his i^ank'n a steel tra]i in whi(di a do^- was caui^ht hy his tonifue and a jiart of it torn out, it was held that tlie man liad tiie fight to protect his premisi's. and that the ohject of fho statute was to protect auimal.s from wilful or wanton cruelty and not from tho incidental pain casually inllicled hy tiic use of lawful means of protection against tlu'in. (2) Wlienever the ])urpo.so for wiiicli tho act is done is to maUe tlio animal more servicoahlo for tho 1180 of man, tho law ought not to ho hold to apply. And, so, tho castration of hor.sos or otiior anin'als or tlio spaying of sows has boon held not to ho cruelty, if done with roasonabio care and skill, ovon though it bo a mi8taUeu idea that it improves them, (ji) And, the di.shorning of cuttle has been held not to be forbidden by the .statute against cruelty. (4) • , , Tho cutting of the combs of cocks to lit thorn for cock fighting or winning j)rizo8 at exhibitions was held to be cruelty. (5) If an injury be intticted by. overdriving, the overdriving must be wanton. If the driver, while honestly exorcising his judgment, happen to err, he is not guilty. An error of judgment is to be dis- tinguished from more recklessness of consequence or wilful cruelty. (1) Com. V. Lufkin, 7 Allen, Mass. 579. ;" ' V ' (2) Hodge V. S., 12 Lea. (Tenn.) 528. ' ■ (3) Lewis V. Fermer, IS Q. B. D. 532. (4) Callaghan v. Soc. etc., 11 Cox, C. C. 101. And see Brady v. McArgle, 14 L. R. (If.) 174. (5) Murphy v. Manning, L. R. 2 Exch. Div. 312. (()) Com. V. Wood ,111 Mass. 408. CRUELTY TO ANIMAI.rf. 616 Wlu-ro tlu' pivvcntion of cruelty ami sutlcring iscoiu'enied, thei'o \h ])lainly ii dirtbreiu'e bctwooii instantaneous death and Ungerbuj (loath; tlio foniKM- IxMiig goiierally if not always painless. And, in favor of those sports which are considered healthful recri'ations tending to iiroiii()t(^ strength. Iiodily agility and courage, even the pain at- tendant upon a lingering death in the lower animals is often disre- garded in the cuHtonis and laws of humane and highly civilized people; so, that tlio angler, who catches tish for pastime, or tho marksman who »8 an exercise of skill or as a diversion, shoots jiigeons as tluy tly wild in tiie woods, is not consideri'd guilty of any violation of the law in ([uestion. lleoiliiiu; <'0<*k|»if .— Kvery one is guilty of an otfence and liable, on summaiy conviction before two justices of the peace, to a penalty not exceeding tilty dollars, or to three months' imprison- ment, with or without hard labour, or to both, who builds, nuikes, maintains or kee[>s a cockpit on jiremises belonging to oroccui)icd by him, or allows a cock-pit to be built, made, maintainc'l or kept on premises belonging to or occupied by him. • 2. All cocks found in any such cock-]>it, or on the premises wherein such cock-])it is. shall l)e contiscated and sold for the ben- etit of the municipality in which such cock-pit is situated. (Code Art. 513.) Coiivc^'Uiii'e of Cattle- -Treatinc'iit, in truiiNit l»y rail or water. — Article 5U of the Oode d ovides that cattle, while being carried by rail or by water, shall not be confined in any car or vessel for a longei- j)eriod tlum twenty-eight hours with- out tlio same being unloaded for rest, water, and feeding for at least five consecutive hours. Penalty for contravention $100, on summary con»Mction. AVhen cattle arc carried in any car or ves.sel giving proper space and opportunity for rest anil ])roper food and water, these provisions as to cattle being unladen do not apply. DEAD BODIES. Digging lip burled body. — It is an oflFence at common law to dig up a dead body from a grave ; and it is no defence to such 616 PKACTIGAI (HJUIK To .MAOEST.IATKS. a churgi' that the motivcH of {]w (Ict'ciitlant were liuiilal)lo. (I) And a pi'isoii who, without lawful authority, tlisposoH of a drad iiody for di.ssocting [)ui'[)oso.s and i'or ^aiu and j»rotit,iH iudictahlo at fonimoii hiw. (2) ^liNCOIIllllcf ill K<'M|»(>«*t to lllIIIIUll IfOlllllillM. — Kvory one is guilty of aii iudictahk' otlouco and liablo to tivo yoai's" iiiiprisonuirnt who — ((/.) without lawful excuse, ucgloets to |torfuvm any duty oithor imiiiKsctl upon him hy law or undertaken l)y liini with vefereneo to tiie burial of any dead human hotly or human remains ; or (6.) improperly or indecently intei'feres with or oti'ers any indig- nity to any deatl human bt)dy or hunxan renuiins, whether buried or not. (Code, Art. 20(5.) I>EFII,KMENT OK WOMEN OR UIllLH. l*iMM*liriii}>; l>4'fil('iiiviit. — Kvery one is guilty of an indielable otlenee, and liable to two years" imprisonment with hard labour, who — ' ~ [a.) ])rocures, or attempts to procure, any girl or woman urnier twenty-one years of age, iu)t being a common prostitute or of known immoral character, to have unlawful carnal connection, either within or without Canada, with any other person or persons ; or (/>.) inveigles or entices any such woman or girl to a house of ill- fame or assignation for the purpose of illicit intercourse or pi'osti- tution, or knowingly conceals in such house any such woman or girl so inveigled or enticed ; or (c.) procures, or attempts to procure, any woman or j^irl to become, either within or without Canada, a common prostitute ; or (d.) procures, or attempts to procure, any woman or girl to leave Canada with intent that she may become an inmate of a brothel elsewhere ; or (e.) procures any woman or girl to come to Canada from abroad (1) R. V. Sharp, Dears & B. 100 ; R. v. Giles, R. & R. 366, v. (2) R. V. Feist, Dears & B. 590. DEFILEMENT (iK WOMEN OR OIKLS. 517 with intent that sho may become an in mate of a l)rotlK'l inCana- du ; or (/.) procures, or attomptH to procure, any woman or girl to leave lior nsmil placi' oriilnxic in f'aiiaiia, sucli place not bciiiif a bi'olhel, with inlcm that she may become an inmate of a brothel, within or without Canada ; or (g.) by threats or intimidation procures, or attempts to procure any woman or girl to have any unlawful carnal connection, cither within or without Canada ; or (h.) by faNe [iretcnces or false representations, procures any woman or girl, not being a common prostitute or of known immor- al diaracter, to have any unlawful carnal connection, cither witiiin or without Canada ; or (j.) applies, administers to, or causes to be taken by any woman or girl any drug, intoxicating liquor, matter, or thing, with intent to stu))ify or overpower so as thereby to enable any person to have unlawful carnal connection with such woman or girl. (Code, Art. 185.) '.: - , ,..■ ., ■ „. - ^ , As to SEARCH WARRANTS to scarch houses of ill-fame, for females believed to have been enticed there, see p. 123, ante. Parent or Oiiardian Prociiriiii; DeKloint'iit.— A parent or guardian of any girl or woman is indictable and |>un- ishable, by 14 years' imprisoi>ment if the girl is under 14 years of age, or by 5 years' imprisonment, if the girl is above 14. if such parent or guardian procures such girl or woman to have carnal connection with any man other than the procurer, or orders, is party to, or jiermits or knowingly receives the avails of the detile- mcnt, seduction or prostitution of such girl or woman. (Code, Art. 18(i.) Householders Permitting Detilement of Oirls on tlicir Premises — Every owner or occupier of prem- ises Avho induces or knowingly suffers any girl to resort or be in or upon such premises for the purpose of being unlawfully and carnally known by any man is guilty of an indictable oifcr.ce, and punishable by 10 years' imprisonment, if such girl is under 14 years 618 PRACTfCAl, uriDK To MAUISTHATES. of ii^t'. and. liy two years' iinpvisoimiciit if tlic ii;irl isof(.i .ilmvi^ 1-1 and under U!. (Code. Art. 1S7,) It lias lieen held, in Kii^land, lliat, under seetion fi of the Criiiiinnl. Jjdir Ammdinent Art, ISS'). 4S— 1!» \'ie. e. (lit, il is udI an oU'enec^ I'or the oeeujiier of a house to permit a man who has sedueed her ilaujfhter. to come on the pivniises to repeat the immoral inlei'- ct)Ui'se, in ortler to secure his con\ietion for carnallv Unowini; the girl. (1) 4'ariinll.v kiiowiiiK; Ion al<> idiiklw or diiiiiiiiioM. — This is indictahle and punish, ilile liy Hve years' imprisonment, (Code, .\rt. 18!l.) Pr4»Mtiliili4»ii 4»r Indian %%'oiii(>ii. — (See Art. 100 ol" the Code.) DISCIPLINE. I>iKi'i|»lill4' of .IliilorN. — Jt is lawful for every parent, or perHon in the place of a parent, schoolmaster or muster, to use force ii}'^ way of correction towards any child, pupil or apprentice uiulcr his cure, jirovided that sucii force is rcasouuble under the clicumstances. (Code, Art. 53.) The doctrine embodied in this article is that a parent, guardian, schoolmaster or master may inflict upon a minor child, ward, pupil or apprentice under his care, such force by way of correc- tion as amounts to moderate, chasti.sement. liut ho must not go beyond this ; if he does, ho will Ito liable to be indicted for as,sault, or — if his excessive chastisement causes the child's deatii — for culpable homicide, (2) The right of a teacher to cli.astiso his pui)il cannot be greater tlian that of the ]>arent over the child. And so where a schoolmaster beat a scholar for two hours with a thick stick the beating was held unlawful, (3) Nor can the teacher of a (1) R. V. Merthyr Tydvil, JJ.. 10 R., June, (1894), 245. (2) 3 Greenl. Ev. b. 63 ; R. v. Cheeaeman, 7 C. & P. 455 ; R. v. Hazel, 1 Leach, 368, (3) R, V, Kopley, 2 F. & P. 202. See alio Brisson v. Lafontaine, 8 L. C. J. 173, and Mitchell v. Defries, 2 U. C. Q. B. 430. niscii'MNE. f)!!) mum (lay sc^liolur, living with tlic piiri'iits. iisiir|t [\w purontal fuiif- tion of cliaslisiiig tbr faults (•(iminitti'd at lioiun. (I) Wlu'iv an a|)l»^onti<•^^ on iioing chi(U'(l hy his mastor tor nogluct- ing some work, inadf a sharp answer, and tlio niasU'r struck and killed tlif appronticn with an iron l>ar whi(di hi» had in his hand, it was iiold to ho munkn", on account, no doubt, of tlio (hmgcrous nature of tho weapon used. (2) But where, in another case, a mastei" struck his servant with one of his clogs because he hud not cleaned tlieni, and deutii unfortunately ensued, it was lield to be manslaughter oidy, because the clog, although an iin[)roper instru- ment to use for the jturpose of correction, was very unlikely to cause death, and therefore the master could have had no intention of taking life when he used it. (H) Where a mother, being angry with one of her children, took up a poker, and, as the child ran to the door which was open, threw it after him, and struck and killed another child wiio hajjpened to bo coming in at the open doorway, it was held that, ulthougii she did not intend to hit, but merely to frighten, the child at wliom she tiirew tiie poker, it was manslaughter. (4) Where the father of a child, two years old, chastised it, for some childish fault, by beating it with a strap on its back and thighs, and the death of tho chihl wa.s thereby accelerated, he was held guilty of manslaughter ; Martin, B., after consulting witii WiUes, J., ruling that tho law of correction had no reference to an infant of two years old, but only to those capable of appreciating correc- tion, and that, although a slight slap might be lawfully given to an infant by its mother, more violent treatment of one so young, by herfatlicr, would not be justifiable. (5) DlNeiplilie on Ships..— The master or officer in com- mand of a ship on a voyage may use force for the ])urpose of maintaining good order and discipline on board of his ship, pro- (1) 1 Bish. New Cr. Law Com. p. 535. (2) R. V. Gray, Kel. (M. (3) H. V. Turner, Comb. 407, 4()8. See also E. v. Wigg, I Leach. 378rt ; R. V. Leggett, 8 C. & P. 191. (4) K. v. Conner, 7 C. & l\ 438. (5) R. V. .GrifBn, 11 Cox, 402. 520 rilACTICAI. Ui:il)E rn mauisthates. viilt'(i tliiit lie liclicvi's, (tii rt'iisoimhlo i^Toiiiids, tlmt sucli forct> in iK'ii'>sai'y, iiiid it' tlio CoiTf used is rciisonuliic in di'ifrcc. (Cddi*, Art. 6)1.) IHSullKhlK.NCE. l>lH4»l»«>lli4'il<'«> !<» a Nltiliil(>. — i-!v('i-y OIK' is ^Miiily (11:111 iiidirdiliic oll'fiici' and liiil)li' to oni" year's iniprisonnient who. with- out hiwt'iil cxiMisc, disohoys uii}' Act of the I'lirliaiiifiit ol ('aiia(hi Of of any ii'Lfislal iin- in Tanaihi. Iiy wilfully doiiiif any act wiii(di it forliids, or omittin;; to do any act wiiicdi it ivijuircs to lie done, unless some penally or oilier mo<lc of |»unisliineMt is expiussly pro- vided by law. (Code. Art. i.'is.) lliM«»l»(>4li4'ii4*(' 4»f' 4^rdorM of Court. — livery one i.H ifuilly of an iiidieluble otl'enee and iitihle to ono yoar's iniprisoii- ment who. without lawfuloxeuse, ilisobeys uiiy lawful onh'r, other than for the payment of money, made liy any court of Justice, or i)y any person or body of |»ersons authorized by any statute to make or give such onler, unless .somo penalty Ih impoHed, or other mode of proceeding is expressly ]n-()vl(le<i by law. (Code, Art. 13!t.) DISORDERLY HOUSES. Keeping m DiNorilt'rly llmiiHC. — Kvery ono is guilty of an indictable oti'onco and liable to one year's imprisonment who keeps any disorderly house, that is to say, any common bawdy- house, common gaming-house, or common betting-ht)uso, as do- finoil by the Code. (Code, Art. 198.) (See BAWDY-HOUSE, ante, p. 470 ; qaming-house, post, p. 557, and BETTiNG-uousB, ante, p. 471.) DRILLINO. Unlawful drilling;. — The Governor-Gonoral may, from lime to time, by proclamation in the Canada Gazette, prohibit as- semblies, without lawful authority, of persons for training or drill- ing or being trained or drilled in the use of arms or for practising military exercises, etc. ; and training or drilling or being present at assemblies for training or drilling, in contravention of any such KMIIIIACBIIV — KSCAI'KS AMI IIKSCI KS. 621 pr>)('luiniiti()n, will \w iiiilictuldc iiinl puiiislmldc liy two vciun' im- prirtuninciit. (('ode. Articles S", HH.) EI.RCTilK! Miliri'. llr«MI4*ll 4»r4'l»lltl*a(*l lO Mlipply IOI«M'tl*i4* lil^lll.— (Si'O CoNTllAcT. |i. fiKM, (intf.) (Si'ii l.Nsi'KrTiON. post.) MMHE/,/,r,EMENT. — (Sf(* TllKI'T, p'lgt.) KMHllACEKY. iMiiliriici^i'V is an attcnipt (o iiilliu'iui' a jury cnn'iiptly to oiiu side, liy promises, porsnasioiis, oiitroatios, moiioy, oiitorhiiiimcMits, and lln' lil<(«. (1) €'orrii|»liiiK«liirorM »r WIIik'nncn. — It i.< an indiclalilit oIliMico, punishablo l»y two ywirs' iinprisoninont. i'or any o\n'. hy throats, bribes, or oIIhm" corrupt means, to dissuade or attempt to dissuado tioy person from ^ivin^ evidence in any civil or criminal CJiso, or to iiiHueiu'c any juryman, or for any wit news or juryman to accept a bribe or otiior corrupt consideration, or for any one to wilfully attempt in any other waj' to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice. (Code, Art. 154.) ESCAPES AND RESCUES. KncapeM. — It is an in<lictable ott'enco punishable by two years' imprisonment for any one, having been convicted of any otteneo, to escape from any lawful custody in which he may bo under such conviction, or, for any one, whether convicted or not, to escape from any prison whore he is lawfully confined on a criminal charge, or for any one, in lawful custody, other than as aforesaid, on a criminal charge, to escape from such custody. (Code, Articles 163, 164.) KeMmlng or aNsiNtiiiK to llKeapc. — It is an in- dictable ott'once, punishable by seven years' imprisonment, for any one to rescue or assist any person in escaping or attempting to escape from lawful custody, under sentence of death or life im- (1) 4B1. Com. 140. 522 I'HACTU^AI. <U IliK TO M XIIISTUATBS. |iriH()iuii«'ii(. or nt'lci' ((iMvicliun of and lict'di'c Mciitciirc tor, or u'liilu in rnstody \i|ion ii cliai'i,'!- of iiny crinu" pimiMliulili' willi dcalli or lilt' iiii|irisonnii'nt : or tor any pfacc olllci'i' liavin;,niiiy ^w\\ person in his lawful cnslody or for an otHccr of any prison, in whicli snch |)crson is lawfnlly citnlintMl, to volnnlarily and intentionally per- mit liini to escape therefrom. (('o(h«. Art, Itlfj,) .\iid if the person so resened or a.ssisted or porniifl«Ml to oKeapc is nndei' sentence tor or convicted (d'. or (dnii';jed wit h an otfenen pnnishaliie with iinprisonmeni for a term less than life, the pnii- islnnent of Ihn person reNcuing ttr assisting or permitting him to eseape in rivn yours' iniprisoniuenl. (Code, .\rt. !(!(!.) It is an indietal)le otVenee pnnisimlih' hy two years' imprisonment for any one, with intiMil to facilitate u prisoner's esi'ape, to convey oi" cause anything to \n' conveyed iido any prison ; or for any one, knowingly and uiduwfully, under color <d' any pretended authority, to direct or procure the dis(duirge of any prisoner not iMititled to ho so discharged; and the person .so dLsclnirged will he luild to have escaped, (('o(U>. Art. ItlH.) ltr(Mlkill)C l*l*iNOil.— It is an indictahlo otl'ence, punishuhlu by Hovon yourw' inipriHonment. for any one, by force or violonco, to break any pri.son with intent to set at liberty himHelf or any other person contined therein on any criminal charge. (Code. Art. Itil.) And an attempt to hri'ak prison is indictable and puinshahle by two years' imprisonment, (Code, Art. 1«!2.) Il«>iii|( h( 1i»rK«> M liilc iiii«l«»r Nviitt'iK'c of Iiii- prlMOiiiiieiit. — This is indu-table and punishable by two years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 15!*.) AjUMiMtiiiK KNCupo of PriNonrrN of War.— This is indictable and jjunishable hy five years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 16((.) KncapeN from Mefornsator^' NcIiooIn, etc. — Soe 53 Vic, c. 37, sec. 1. EVinENCE. <i}eneral Klilcft. — In general, there is no diflerence in the rules of evidence applicable to civil and criminal cases. (1) But (1) R. V. Wataon, 2 Stark N. P. 155 ; R v. Atkinson 17 U. C. C. P. 304. KvibBNcR. ri2:i (lie iimuiiiit 1)1' dc^riH' nt' |lit> proof (<t lut oxaclfil will vary Willi liio iiiiliiri' of tlic |iro(('i<(iiii/fs. For, wliilo, in lualtcrs of civil jiirisdiclioM, a incrc |in'|ioml('raii('ii of proof will siillicc to CMlalilixli a case, (lie proof o| I lie ilcft'iiilanl's ^iiill in list, in crinuii- al prncci-ilin^rs. he full ami tonvincin^ ; tmd tho lit'fnndiint In cnlillcil to tho lK>nollt of any iloiiht llial may oxint in llic niimls of llu' Jury or in llu' minds of jnHlifOH occupyin;^ llif |»oHilion and cx- I'riisinir thi" fnnctions of a jury. (1) Tlio law prcMunuiH innoconcc until tlu» contpury is provt'd. lIcarHay cvidcnci* is inadniissilik'. ( 'onvi'i'satiiMis wliicli huw taUi-n place out of the hearing ol tlic l)arty to be ailoctcd cannot he admitted in ovidtinee. 'I'iio oviileiice of an accomplice is a(lmissii)lc, hut ou^lit not to he fully relied on, unless corrohorated hy homio collateral proof, The evidence otlbrod should he only sucdi as is relevant to the issue ; and witnesses should he asked only «iu(*stioiis of fact. Ah a general rule the opinions of a witnoss are not adniissihle as evidciue. Hut there is an exception in the case of a slville(i or Hoii'ntitic witness, whose opinions are adniissihle to elucidate mutters of a Htrictly professional orscientilic character, Coiii|»iirlNoii or<liN|iut«'d writiii); with K(>iiiiiii4>. — ("om|)aris()n o< a disputed writing with any writing proved to the satisfaction of the court to he genuine shall bo permitted to ho made hy witncs.ses; and such writings, and tho evidence of witnosses respecting the same may be subniittod to tho court and jury as evidence of the genuineness or otherwise of the writing in disjuito. (Code, Art. (il>8.) Coiiti<l('iitial C*oiii III iinlcutioiiM.— Counsel, solicitors, and attorneys cannot be com])elled to disclose communications made to them iu professional contidenco by their clients. Nor can priests and ministers of religion be coriipelled to disclose secrets confided or confessed to them under the regulations of their respective churches or religious persuasions. A witness cannot bo compelled (1) Kerr'B Mag. Acts, 15. 34 524 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. and will not be allowed to state facts, the disclosure of which may be prejudicial to any public intoi-est. The advice which a solicitor gives to a client in connection with the latter's defence on a criminal charge is privileged ; but the communications made to a solicitor and the advice given by him are not privileged, when the communications are made anil the ailvice is obtained by the client, previous to and with the view of committing the ottence. (1) Kxtent of* Kigali to crosiJ^i-vxaiuiiK'. — If a witness in called to produce a document, — which either requires no proof, or can be identified by some other person, — he need not be sworn, and, if not sworn, he is not subject to cross-examination. (2) But where a person is intentionally called and sworn, and is moreover a competjut witness, the opposite party has a right to cross exam ine him although the party calling him has declined to ask a sin gle question. (3) It is usual for the prosecution to call every witness whose name is endoi'sed on the indictment, and even if he declines to call any such witness he should have him in Court so that he may be called for the defence, if required. (4) And the Judge will sometimes call any witness omitted, so as to give the prisoner's counsel an oi>portunity to cross-examine him. (5) The cross-examination is not limited to the matters upon which the witness has been examined in chief, but extends to the whole case. (6) And therefore if the plaintiff calls a witness to j)rove the simplest fact connected with the case, the defendant is at liber- ty to cross-examine him on every issue, and, by putting leading questions, to establish, if he can, his entire defence. (7) (1) R. V. Cox, 15 Cox, 611. (2) R. v. Murlm, M. &M., 515. (3) K. V. Brooks, 2 Stark, R. 47.'. (4) R. V. Woodhead, 2 C. & K., 520; R. v, Cassidy. 1 F & F. 79. (5) R. V. Bull, 9 C. ,fc P. 22; R. v. Vincent, 9 C. & P. 91. (6) Berwick on Tweed v. Murray, L. J.. ( h., 281, 286. (7) Morgan v. Brydges, 2 Stark, R. 314; R. v. Murphy, 1 A. M. & 0- 20(.. EVIDENCE. 525 Coiii|><'lliHK lii<*riniiiiutiii|; AiiNwrrM. — No person shall be excugeJ from answering any question upon the ground that the answer to such question may tend to criminate him, or may tend to establish his liability to a civil proceeding at the in- stance of the Crown or of any other person. Provided, however^ that no evidence so given shall be used or receivable in evidence against such person in any criminal proceeding thereafter instituted against him other than a prosecution for perjury in giving such evidence. (Ca/i. Eo. Act, 189H, sec. 5.) The etfect of this section appears to be that on the trial of a cri. jiiinal charge no ])roof can be nuide of anything which the accused may have said while under examination as a witness in any other case, v/hether, at the time of testifying, he did or did not object to the questions put to him, as tending to elicit self incriminating an- swers. For instance, onu Eose Morrison was charged with bigamy, in having during the lifetime of hertirst husband, Jeremiah Xirby, nuirried one William May. For the defence it was contended that her marriage with Kirby was void, as he (Kirby) was then already a married man with a wife still living ; and Kirby, on being exam- ined as a witness at the ])reliminary investigation, made admissions to that ctlect. At the time of so testifying, Kirby himself was un- der arrest on a charge of bigamy in having married Eose Morrison during the lifetime of his tir.st wife ; and on his being subsequent- ly brought to trial on this charge in the Court of Queen's Bench, at Montreal, in June 1894, the Crown Counsel offered to prove the admissions made by Kirby in his evidence given in the police Court in the case against Eose Morrison. But it was held, by Chief Jus- tice Lact)ste, that this could not be done, that under section 5 of the Canada Eoidenre Act, Kirby was bound to answer the questions put to him, that there would have been no use for him to object on the ground that his answers might incriminate him, and that the latter part of the section was an absolute bar to his evidence being used in any prosecution against him. (1) AdmlsNioHB at Trial. — Any accused person on his trial for any indictable offence, or his counsel or solicitor, may admit (I) R. V Kirby, Q. B.. Montreal, June 1894. {Not Rep.) 526 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. any fact alleged against the accused so as to dispense with proof thereof. (Code, Art. 690.) Kvidencc or other Criminal Actn Coininlttcd by the Aceiised. — It is not competent for the prosecution to prove other criminal acts of the accused outside of those forming the suhject mutter of the charge in hand for the purpose of show- ing that the defendant is a person likely from his criminal conduct or character, to have committed the offence for which he is being tried. Still, the mere fact that the evidence adduced may tend to show the commission of other crimes does not render it inadmissible, if it be relevant to an issue, and it may be relevant if it bears upon the question of whether the acts alleged to constitute the crime charged were designed or accidental. Thus, where, in a case of arson, the question was whether the burning was accidental or WILFUL, evidence was allowed to show that on another occasion the defendant was in such a situation as to render it probable that he was then engaged in the like ott'once against the same property. And where a woman was on trial for having murdered her hus- band by administering arsenic, evidence was admitted to show that two of her sons who had formed part of the same family and for whom, as well as for her husband, the prisoner had cooked their food, had died of poison, the symptoms in all these cases being the same. (2) On an indictment for attempting to obtain money by falsely pretending that a ring was composed of diamonds, when in fact it was composed of crystals, it was held that, to show the defendant's guilty knowledge and his intent to defraud, evidence was admiss- ible of a false pretence by him, on a prior occasion, to another person, that a chain was gold, whereas it was plated, and, on another distinct occasion, that a ring was of diamonds, which it was not. (3) _ (1) R. V. Dossett, 2 C. & K. 3(6. (2) It. v. Geering, 18 L. J. M. C. 215. See also, Makens and wife, v. Atty. Gen. N. S. Wales, 6 R. /aw. (1894) 22. (3) It. V. Francis, 43 L. J. M. C. 97. KVIDENCE. — EXCISE. 627 Documentary Kvidenoc. — Imperial Acts and all ordin- ances of the (xovornoi* General in Council or of any Lieutenant- Governor in Council and all provincial statutes arc to bo judicially noticed. {Can. Ev. Act, 1S93, sec. 7.) See, as to proof of iiroclamations, etc., sees. 8, 9 & 11, Can. Ev. Act. Evidence of any jiroceeding in any court or before any justice of the peace or any coroner, or of any official or public document or of any entry in a public book, or, (in the province of (Juebec) of any notarial document, may bo made by producing a certified copy of or extract therefrom. (Can. Ev. Act, sees. 10, 12 & 18.) But no copy of such book or document can be received in evidence upon any trial, unless the party intending to produce it has, before the trial, given to the party against whom it is intended to be i)ro- duced reasonable notice, such notice to be not less, in any case, than TEN days. (Can. Ev. Act, sec. 19.) Fabricatliii; Evidence. — It is an indictable offence, pun- ishable by seven years imprisonment, to fabricate evidence by any means other than perjury or subornation. (Code, Art. 151.) See, further, as to bvidence, the Competknoy op Accosed as a WITNESS, the Modes of swearing, appirmino, confessions, etc., pp. 203-219, ante. And as to Competency of dependant as a wit- ness on his own behalf, when charged with an oppence pun- ishable UNDER provincial LAWS, SCO pp. 320-321, ante. Excise. Matters subject to excise are regulated by the Inland Revenue Act (R.S.C., c. 34), and its amendments, 51 Vic. c. 16, 52 Vic. o. 15, 53 Vic. c. 23, 54-55 Vic. c. 46, 55-5G Vic. c. 22, and 57-58 Vic. c. 35. The expression " subject to excise" moans subject to the pro- visions of the Inland Revenue Act, or of any other act respecting duties of excise or the inland revenue, or of any proclamation, order-in-councii or departmental regulation published or made under such provisions ; and every place wherein licit or illicit, licensed or unlicenced mashing, fermentation, distillation, rectify- ing, brewing or malting, or manufacturing of tobacco, or of cigars, 528 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAQISTBATES. or mauufaoturing in bond or maim factu ring of any article on wliifh Ihei'e is a duty of exciao or customs, and on which such duty has not been paid, is carried on or |)orfonnud — and every worm, still, mash-tub, fermenting tunor other tool, utensil, appa- ratus or thing which is or might be used for such purposes hiw- fully or unlawfully, are deemed to bo " subject to excise." (1) No person not licensed as provided by the Inland Revenue Act, shall carry on the business or trade of a distiller, rectitier, com- pounder, brewer or malster, or of a numufacturer of tobacco or cigars, or bonded manufacturer, nor use any utensil, machinery or apparatus suitable for carrying on any such trade or business, or any business subject to excise, nor import, make or begin to make any still, rectitier, or other apparatus suitable for the manu- facture of wash, beer or spirits, or for the rectification or com- pounding of spirits. And no person shall import, make, or have in his po.ssession, or keep any still, worm, mash-tub, fermenting- tun, distillery, rectifying or brewing apparatus, or any malt-kiln, or malt-floor or any apparatus for the manufacture or production of malt, or any tobacco press or mill for cutting or grinding tobacco without having given, when such articles came into his possession, and on or before the tenth of July of each 8ub.sequent year, a full and ])articular list, description and return thereof to the Collector of Inland Kevenue of the division in which such article or apparatus is located, of the same nature and in the same form as is required by the Inland Revenue Act in an application for a license to use similar apparatus or machinery. (1{. S. C. c. 34, sec, 9.) If any officer of inland revenue, after having demanded admit- tance into any distillery, malt-house, brewery, tobacco manufac- tory, cigar manufactory, bonded manufactory or other premises subject to excise, is not immediately admitted, he may enter there- in by force. (E. S. C. c. 34, sec. 70.) Tlie collector or other officer of Inland Revenue, or any person or persons acting under him or by his directions respectively, having first obtained a search warrant for that purpose from some justice of the peace, who may grant the same on affidavit (made (1) R. 8. C. c. 34, sec. 8 (6). EXCISE. — EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCES. 529 before him and to his satisfaction, and stating roasoniil)lo grounds for the issuing thereof), may, at any hour •• tween sunrise and sunset, enter into and search any house, building or phvco men- tioned in such search warrant, as being one in whicii it has been made to appear by affidavit that there is reasonable cause to suppose that an unlicensed still, worm, mash-tub, cooler, fermont- ing-tun, malt-floor or kiln, press, cutting-knife, mill or other vessel or implement is unlawfully in use or possession, or that the pro- visions of the Inland Revenue Act are otherwise violated. R. S. 0. c. 34, sec. 71.; Every manufacturer who neglects or refuses to keej) his license posted up in a consjjicuous i)lace in his manufactory shall incur a penalty of $50 for the first offence, and of $100 for each subsequent offence. (K. S. C. c. 34, sec. 82.) All stock, machinery, tools, worms, stills, utensils, manufactured articles, horses, vehielei:^ and other appliances found in any distil- lery, malt-house, brewery, tobacco manufactory, cigar manufac- tory, boixKd manufactory or other p/emises for which a license is required under the Act, but in respect of which no such license has been taken out, are liable to be seized and forfeited. (R. S. C. c. 34, sec. 83.) A variety of punishments by fine and imprisonment are imposed by the Act and its amendments, for violations of their provisions. And, — (under sections 102 antl 103), — every person who violates any ja-ovision of the Act, or who neglects any dutj' imposed upon him thereby — for which violation or neglect no other penalty is therein specially provided — incurs a penalty of $200 ; and whenever any person is convicted of any offence for which a money penalty only ie thereby pi-ovided, the court may, in addition to or in lieu of an}"^ ])unishment authorized by the Act, sentence the offender to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years. Explosive Substances. Causing dangerous explosions. — It is an indictable offence, punishable by imprisonment for life, to wilfully cause, by any explosive substance, an explosion of a nature likely to endanger life or cause serious injury to property, whether any injury is actually caused or not. (Code, Art. 99.) 530 I'KACTICAI, OUIDE TO MAdlSlRATES. noiiiy; any act or poMMCNNiii); Hi>y cxploNivii' wifh intent to cauNC an (-ixplikNion. — This is indicluhlo and punishablo by fourU;;'!! yours' iinprisoiiiiKMit. (Code, Art. TOO.) Unlau'l'nlly n■akin^' or |ftONNt>NNin)>; tvxploNivoN. — This is iiidii'tiiblo and pnnisiuiblo by seven years' iniiirisonnient. (Code, Art. 101.) OanNing bodily injnry hy vx|>lo.sivvN.— It is an indietable otfoneo, pnnishablo by life inipri.sonment, to nnlawi'uliy, and by an explosion, burn, maim, disliguro, disable, or do grievous bodily liarm to any person. (Code, Art. 247.) AtteinptN to canNe bodily injnrioN l»y cv ploNivc'N.— (See Art. 248 of the Code.) NeixHr4>! of cxpioNiveiii. — (See Skarch Warrants, pp. 118, 119, ante.) . nestroyin}^ liuiidinirr*, etc., I>y i>xploNi%4>N. — Wilfully placing or throwing any explosiv^o into or n :\Ra build- ing or ship, with intent to destroy the same or anything therein, is indictable and punishable by fourteen jears' imprisonment whether any exiilosion occurs or not. (Code, Art. 488.) Extortion. In a broad sense, extortion signifies any oppression under color of riglit ; but, in a more strict sen.se, it signifies the unlawful taking, by any officer of justice, by color of his office, of any money or thing of value that is not due. (1) According to Black - stone, it is " any officer's unlawful taking, by color of his office, from any man, any money or thing of value that is not due to him, or more than is due, or before it is due." (2) It has been held to be extortion in any under-sheriff to obtain his fees by refusing to execute process till they were paid, (H) and in a Jailer to obtain money from his prisoner by color of his ( ! / ■' ''f (1) 1 Hawk. P. C. c. 68,8. 1. (2) 4 Bl. Com. 141. (3) Hescott's case, 1 Salk. 330. BXTORTION.— EXTRADITION. — FALSE NEWS. T);'.! office. (1) And whoro magistnites sat togothor, and one of thorn oxat'ted inonoy IVoni a prisoner I'hargod before them with felony, the other not dissenting, it was lield that they might be jointly convicted of extortion. (2) tiXtortioii hy Ucluniiitory lilbel.— (See J jinzL, post.) liXtortion hy TliroutM to AviriiNC ot Crime. — (See Threats, /jos^) ,, . See RoBBEHY, pos^) !,;■,■ KXTHADITION. See The Extradition Act, and a list of offences extraditable between Canada and the United States, in the Aiu'enuix, ^os^ False News. N|»r«>adiii{>; FalNe Mew**. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable otience and liable to one year's imprisonment who wil- fully and knowingly publishes any false news or tale whereby injury or mischief is or is likely to be occasioned to any public interest. In 1778 there was a case of this kind in which the defendant was indi'jted for having imlawfuUy, wickedly and maliciously published false news — whereby discord might grow between the king and his subjects or the great men of the realm — by publish- ing and placarding a printed notice falsely announcing that an order in council had been made by the king proclaiming war with France. (3) False Pretences. Definition. — A false pretence is a representation, either by words or otherwise, of a matter of fact either present or past, which representation is known to the person making it to be false, and which is made with a fraudulent intent to induce the person to whom it is made to act upon such representation. (1) R. V. Broughton, Trem. P. C. 11] ; R. v. Tracey, 6 Mod. 178. (2) R. V. Tisdale, 20 U. C. Q. B. 272. (3) Scott's case, 5 New Newgai Calendar, 284. 532 PRACTICAL OUIDE T(» MAOIHTKATKa. 2. l<]xa;?ijfc'rivto(l commondatioii or d»)i)ivt'iiiti<)n of tho quality of nnythiiig in not a f'alMo pn'teiuo, uiiIosm it '\h carried to huoIi an extent aH to amount to a fraudulent misrej)reHeiitatioii of fact, I^. It is a quoHtion of fact whether sUch commendation or depre- ciation does or does not amount to a frauilulent misrepresentation of fact. (Code, Art. 358.-) PlliiiNliiHOut.— Every one is guiltj* of an indictal)lo offence and liable to throe years' imprisonment who, with intent to de- fraud, either directly or throwjh the medium of any contract obtained bij such false pretense, obtains anything capable of being stolen, or procures anything cai)ai»le of being stolen to be delivered to any other person than himself. (Code, Art. ;^51t.) DiNtiiietioii bctwevii obtaining l*y FalNf Pr«- teiices aiKl Tln't't.— In a case oi theft, tho owner of the thing in question has no intention of parting with his property therein to the party obtaining it, wliile in the case of an obtaining by false pretenses he luis an intention of parting with it, but his conse, t to part with it is brought about by tho ialse pretense made to him, (1) If a servant, acting under a general authority co-equal with his master's, intentionally part with his master's property, under a misconception fraudulently induced by false representa- tions as to the real facts, such property is not stolen, but obtained by false pretences ; but, if the servant, having only a limited authority, and being precluded from j)arting with the property, is, nevertheless, tricked out of it, the offender thus obtaining it is guilt}- of theft ; because the master has never consented to nor authorized the parting with it. (2) To constitute the crime of obtaining by false pretenses there must be ; 1, a false statement, which represents, as existing, some- thing which docs not exist, or which represents, as having hap- pened or existed, something which has not happened or existed ; 2, the offender must also have known, when making the false (li White v. Gardner, 10 C. B. 927; R. v. Barnes 2 Den. C. C 59; R. v. Raddiffe, 12 Cox, 474. (2) R. V. Prince, L. R. 1 C. C. R. 150. ,KAI.HK IMlETKNCEa. 598 Htatomont or ropresontatioii, that it was falHn ; and 3, tho goods in question must have l)Oun ))arl(.Hl with in conscquenco of and through tho t'alHC roprcsontation. (1) A moro roprcHontation a 4 to mma future fact, ova false promise, by tho party charged, that ho will do or means to do a particular act, will not suttioo to constitute a falso pretence ; (2) unless it be conjoinod with a false pretence as to an existing fact. (3) There is a false pretence whoro a person goes to a shop and says that ho is sent by some |)articular customer for such and such goods, which, upon the faith of what he says, are handed to him ; or where money is obtained i»y moans of a begging letter sotting forth false statements as to tho name and circumstances of the accused ; (4) or whoro A falsely represents that he is connected with B, a person of known oi)ulence, and, on the faith of such representation, obtains properly for himself; (5) or, whoro K, with intent to defraud, buys goods, and on taking possession of them pays for them by a cheque, stating that ho wishes to pay ready money for them, but knowing at tho time that ho Las only^ a nominal balance at the bank on which tho cheque is drawn, and that ho has no power to overdraw his account, and not intending to pay money in to meet the cheque. ((J) A. sold to B., a railway pai"s, representing it to bo valid in B's hands, but as a matter of fact it was not transferi-able, but only good to carry a particular person, and could not be used by B., except at the risk of being, at any moment, expelled from the train. A. was hold guilty of obtaining ,by false pretences, the money paid to him, by B., for such pass. (7^ A prisoner who had obtained money and goods by protending that a paper which he produced was tho bank note of an existing (1) R. V. Welman, Dears. 188; R. v. (iiles, L. & C. 502. (2) R. V. Johnson. 2 Moo; C. C. 254. R. v. Lee, 9 Cox, 304; R. v. Bertles 13 C. K (Ont.) 607. (3) R. V. Jennlson, L. & C. 157; R. v. West. 8 Cox, 12; R. v. Crossley, 2 M. & Rob. 17; R. v. Giles. 34 L. J. M. C. 50. (4) R. V. Jones, 1 Den. C. C. 551. (5) R. V. Archer, 1 Dears. 449. (6) R. V. Hazleton, L. R. 2 C. C. 134. (7) R. V. Abrahams, 24 L. C. J. 325. 684 I'UACnCAL (ICIDE to MAtllMTlUTBS. Bolvont hunk, wliii'li Im kiu'W liiul stopped piiymont forty yours bofoiv, wus lu^ld guilty of i)l)tiiiiiiiig hy t'ulso pn'toiicus. (1) If the pmrliuscr intcmls to huy u particular siihstancf. and tho BoMer passi's otVto him u coimterfiMt, — and money is iluis ol)lained, — that is a false pretence within lhi< statii'i' (2) And it may also be conslitnted l»y a frandnlent repres(>iitation as to the (/tiantlfy of goods sold. Kor instance, where ,V. Iniviiiu; ciontractcd to sell and doliver to B. a load of coals at 7d. per cwl. (hdivered to hor a load wliicli lio know weighed only l-t cwt., hut which he stated to her containiMl I.S cut and produced a ticket, to that elfect, whi(di he said he himself had made out, wIivMi tho coals wore weighed, and slio llioronpon ])aid him tho price for 18 cwt, it was hold that A was guilty of obtaining hy false protoncos. (H) ^ A false roprosentatiou that u stamp on a watch is tho hall-mark of tho goldsmiths' Company, and that tho number 18, part thereof, indicates that it is made of 18 carat gold, is a false i)rotonco. (4) A person who sold spurious blacking, which ho roprosentod as " i'jvorotts lilacking,' was held to bo indictable for false protoncos. (6) The pretence need not bo in words ; tho conduct jind acts of the party may bo sutticient to constitute a false pretence, without any verbal represontation. Thus, giving, in payment, for goods, u cheque upon a banker, with whom the defendant has no account, is a false pretonct^ (6) JJut if, at tho time of giving the cheque, the defendant, — although he has no account at the bankers upon whom ho draws the cheque, — believes that it will be paid at that bank on presentation, he is not guilty of a false pretence. (7) Where a person, at Oxford, not being a member of tho Univer- sity, went, for the purpose of fraud, wearing a University com- moner's gown, and, in this garb, obtained goods, it was hold a suf- (1) R V. Dowey, 37 L. J. M. C. 52 ; R. v. Brady 26 U. C. Q. B. 14. • (2) K. v. Rngg, Bell, C. C. 218 ; 29 L. .1. M. C. 86. (3) R. v. Sherwood, Dears & B. 251 ; R. v. I.ee,33 L. J. M. C. 129. (4) R. V. Suter, 10 Cox, 577. (5) R. V. Dundas, 6 Cox, 380. {«) R. V. Lara, 6 T. R. 565 ; R. v. Flint. R. cfc R. 460 : R. v. Oackson. 3 Camp. 370 ; R. V. Hunter, and R. v. Carter, 10 Cox, 642, 648. (7) R. v. Walne, 11 Cox, C. C. R. 647. VAI.KE PRETENCBH. 635 firi(Mit f'lilso pvotoni'O to siitisly i\w stntuto, ulllioiigh no roproHcn- liitiiiii piiMsi'd in wotiIh. (1) Tlio fact that tho tlut'oiulunt, iit Iho time of obtuiniiij^ goods hy fttlHO protoncort, intoiidod to pay for thorn wlionublo to do 8o, utlofils no dofonco. (2) Tho ptirting with tho property muHt 1)0 indncod hy tho false protoiico ; and, tlioroforo, whoro A. in.i<l" false roprosontutions to nnd thorolty induced H., to soli him, A,, sonio horses, but B., ivfter- wiirds, on loarning tho falsity of tho roprosontations, entered into u now agrooniont in writing with tho prisoner, it was lield that tho suhseqiiont dealings ropollod tho idea that tlio pntsooutor liad parted with Iho iiorsos in oonsoquonco of tho false pretence. (8) Wliore the dofondant ottered to pledge with a pawnbroker, a oliain wiiioh h»^ falsely roitresontod to bo silver, but tlio pawnbroker stated that ho advaneed money on it, not in oonsequonee of defen- dant's Btatement but in rolianoo on its withstanding u tost whioh he himself applied to it, it was hold tiiut the defendant oouhl not bo oonvioted of obtaining tho money by moans of tho false protenoo but that he was properly oonvioted of atteiiipUmj to obtain money by false pretences. (4) When the prosecutor himself knows the falsehood of the pro- toneo but parts with his money or goods, notwithstanding, tho defendant cannot bo convicted of obtaining by false pretences ; (5) but in such a case ho may (under Article 711 of the Code), bo con- victed of attemptiug to obtain by false ]»retences, althougli. tho indictment charges him with obtaining. The mere fact of the prosecutor having the moans at hand of acquiring knowledge of tho falsity of the pretence will not of it- self excuse the defendant so as to prevent him from being con- victed of obtaining by false i)rotenco9. (6) Parol evidence has been held admissible to prove the false ))re- toncos hud in the indictment, although u deed made between the (1) K. V. Barnard, 7 C. & P., 784. (2) R. V. Naylor, 35 L. J. M. C. 61. (3) R. V. Connor, 14 U. C. C. P. 529. (4) R. V. Roebuck, Dears. & B. 24; 25 L. J. M. C. 101. (5) R. V. Mi lid, Dears. & B. 205 ; 26 L. J. M. C. 79. («) R. V. Jeesop, Dears. & B. 442 ; 27 L. J. M. C. 70. 636 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. parties and stating a differont consideration for parting with the money was put in evidence for the prosecution ; such deed having boon made for the purposes of the fraud. (I) And it has been decided, upon a case reserved, that the execu- tion of a contract between the parties does not secure froui pun- ishment the obtaining of monej- under false pretences. (2) It will be noticed that Article 359 expressly declares that the obtaining by false pretence, shall be punishable whether it is done DIRECTLY or THROUGH THE MEDIUM OF A CONTRACT. Obtaining Execiitl»ii ot* Yaluable iieciirity by False Pretences. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to three ^'^ears' imprisonment who, with intent to defraud or injure any person by any false pretence, causes or induces any person to execute, make, accept, endoree or destroy the whole or any part of any valuable security, or to write, impress or affix any name or seal on any parchment in order that it may afterwards be made or converted into or used or dealt with as a valuable security. (Code, Art. 361). ) Falsely Pretending to enclose ]fIoney in a I^etter. — Every one is guilty of an indictable otfence and liable to three years' imprisonment who, wrongfully and with wilful false- hood, pretends or alleges that he enclosed and sent, or caused to be enclosed and sent, in any post letter, any money, valuable security, or chattel, which in fact he did not so enclose and send or cause to be enclosed or sent therein. (Code, Art. 361,) Obtaining Passage by False Ticket.— Every one is guilty of an indictable ort'ence and liable to six months' impris- onment who, by means of any false ticket or order, or of any other ticket or order, fraudulently and unlawfully obtains or attempts to obtain any passage on any carriage, tramway or railway, or in any steam or other vessel. (Code, Art. 362.) (1) R. v. Adamson, 2 Mood, C. C. 286. (2i R. v. Abbott, 1 Den. 173 ; K. v. Burton, 25 I.. J. M. C. 105 ; R. v. Meakin, 11 Cox, C. C. R. 270. FALSE TKLEQRAMS, ETC. — FERHIEa. 537 FALSE TELEURAMS OR LETTERS. NeiKliiig nil author ix«d Telegrams. — Every one is guilty of an indictable ott'ence who, with intent to defraud, causes or procures any telegram to be sent or delivered as being sent by the authority o( any person, knowing that it is not sent by such authority, with intent that such telegram should bo acted on as being sent by that person's authority, and is liable, upon conviction thereof, to the same punishment as if he had forged a document to the same effect as that of the telegram. (Code, Art. 428.) Ni>n«1iiig FalHV Telcgranis or I.>etterw. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' imprison- ment who, with intent to injure or alarm any person, sends, causes, or procures to be sent any telegram or letter or other message con- taining matter which he knows to h<> false. (Code, Art. 429.) FALSE WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS. (See FRAVD, post p. 550.) FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR. ]>lstlnction Abolished. — The distinction between felony and misdemeanor is abolished. And offences which are indictable are called " indictable offences ; " while those which are not indictable are called " offences." (Code, Arts. 535 536.) FERRIES. The issuing of licences for ferries is regulated by the E. S. C. c. 97. Sections 3 and 4 (as amended % 51 Vic. c. 23) provide that in the case of a ferry between Canada and any other countiy, a license may be granted for a period not exceeding ten years, and that for ferries between any two provinces, such licenses shall be offered to public competition, and thqt after such public competition they may be granted for any period not exceeding FIVE years. And section 8 provides that every person who in- terferes with the rights of any licensed ferryman shall, upon ■ conviction thereof, before a justice of the peace, for the county, city or district in which either terminus of the ferry is situated, incur a penalty not exceeding $20. 638 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. FIRE ARMS. (Soo OFFENSIVE WEAPONS, pOSt.) (See ARMY AND NAVY, ante, pp. 44G-4-49.) FISHERIES. This subject is regulated by The Fisheries Act, (R. S. C, c. 95) and its amendments, 52 Vic., c. 24, 54-55 Vic, c. 43, and 57-58 Vic. c. 51. Section 6 of the Act, as amended, provides that every one who hunts or kills seals, porpoises, whales, or fish of any kind, by means of rockets, explosive materials, or explosive projectiles or shells shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding $300 and costs and, in default of payment, to imprisonment not exceeding 6 months. Sections 5, 8 and 9 have reference to cod, salmon and trout and whitetish fisheries respectivelv. And section 10, (as amended by57- 58 Vic, sec 3), contains a number of new provisions as to lobster tishing, the canning, preserving or curing of lobsters, the marking, labelling or stamping of cases containing lobsters canned, preserved or cured in Canatla, and of cases of lobsters imported into Canada from other countries, and also some provisions prohibiting the cunning, preserving or curing of lobsters except under license from the Minister of Marine and Fisheries. As to the power to search for Hsh taken in violation of the Act, and as to the power to bring into port and search any foreign YESStL HOVERING IN CANADIAN WATERS, See p. 130 ante. FOOD. Adulteration — The penalty for a wilful adultsration of an}- article of food or of any drug is, — when the adulteration is injurious to health, — $50, (and not less than $10), and costs, for a first offence, and $200, (and not less than $50), and costs, for each subsequent offence ; and, when the adulteration is not injurious to health, the penalty is $30 and costs, for a first offence, and $100 (and not less than $50), and costs, for each subsequent oftence. (1) (1) R. S. C. e. 1(>7, seo. 22. paoD. 639 The penalty for selling or offering or exposing for sale any adulterated article deemed injurious to heahh is $50 and costs, for a first offence, and S200 (and not less than $50) for a subsequent offence ; and for selling or offei'ing or exposing for sale any adul- terated article not deemed injurious to health, the penalty is $50 (and not less than 85), and costs. (1) Provided, that, if the person accused proves that he had purchased the article as the same, in nature, substance and quality, as that demand jd of him by a pur- chaser or the inspector, and with a written warranty to that effect, to be produced at the trial, and that he sold the article in the same state as when he purchased it, and that he could not with reason- able diligence have obtained knowledge of its adulteration, he shall bo discharged from the prosecution, and shall be liable to pay the costs incurred by the prosecutor, unless he has given notice to him that ho will rely on the above defence, in which case he shall be liable only to forfeiture of the adulterated article. (2) The expres.sion " food " includes every article used for food or drink by man or cattle, and every ingredient intended for mix- ing with the food or drink of man or cattle for any purpose what- soever. (53 Vic, c. 26, sec. 2.) And the expression " drug " includes all medicines for internal and external use for man or cattle, (lb. sec. 2 b.) It has been held in England that baking powder composed of in. gredients some of which are injurious to health is not an article of food, within the meaning of the Sales of Food and Drugs Act, 1875, which defines food as being, for the purposes of that vAct, " every article used for food and drink, by man, other than drugs or wa- ter," and that therefore the selling of a package of such baking powder is not a selling of food in contravention of the Act. (3) But such a sale would be an offence in Canada ; because the definition of food, as contained in the above clause b, sec. 2 of 53 Vic, c 26, covers every ingredient intended for mixing with food or drink. A person bought, from Grimble & Co., a cask of malt vinegar, labelled, " Vinegar, — warranted unadulterated, (irimble & Co., Limited, Cumberland Market, London." Some of. the vinegar in (1 ) lb. sec. 2.3. (2) 53 Vic, c. 26, sec. 9. (3) James v. Jones, 10 R. Oct. (1894) 265. 35 ^40 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. the same condition as purchased, was sold to a customer by the person io buying from (.rrimble & Co. The vinegar contained 30 per cent, of added wator. Held, that this was a written warranty- and that the i)er8on so buying from Grimble was protected. (1) If milk is sold or offered or exposed for sale after any valuable constituent thereof hae been abstricted therefrom, or if rater has been added thereto, or if it is the product of a diseased animal or of an animal fed upop unwholesome food, it is deemed to have been adulterated in a munner injurious to health. But skimmed milk. may be sold, as such, if contained in cans bearing on their exterior the word " skimmed," and if served in measures similarly mai'ked. Still, any person supplying such skimmed milk, — unless such qua- lity of milk has been asked for by the purchaser, — shall not be en- titled to set upthe above provision as a defence to or in extenua- tion of any violation of the Act. (2) The manufacture or sale of oleomargarine, butterine and any other substitute for butter manufactured from any animal sub- stance other than milk is prohibited under a penalty of $400 (and not less than $200), and twelve months (not less than three months) imprisonment, in default of payment. (3) The penalty for selling, supplying or sending, — to any cheese, butter, or condensed milk maker or manufacturer, — any milk dilut- ed with water, or in any way adulterated, or any skimmed milk or any milk tainted or partly sour, or any milk drawn from a diseas- ed cow, is $50 (and not less than $6) and costs, and imprisonment not exceeding six months, in default of payment. (4) The making of any cheese from or by the use of skimmed milk to which there has been added any fat foreign to such milk, and the knowingly buying, selling or exposing or having for sale any cheese so manufactured, is punishable by a fine not exceeding $500 (and not less than $25) and costs, and imprisonment, not exceeding six months with or without hard labour, in default of payment. (6) (1) Lindsay v. Rook, 10 R. Dec. (1894) 429. (2) R. S. C, c. 107. sec. 15. (3) R. 8. C, c. 100, sec. 1. (4) 52 Vic. c. 43, sees. 1, 3, 5. (5) 56 Vic. c. 37, sec. 2. POOD. ' 641 Choeso made from or by the use of skimmed milk must not bo sold, offorod or exposed or had in possession for sale, unless the words "8KIM-MILK cheese" are legibly branded, marked or stamped on the side of every cheese, and also upon the outside of every box or package containing the same. Penalty, S5 (not less than $2) and costs, for every such cheese or box or package sold, offered, expos- ed or had in possession for sale ; and three months' imprisonment, with or without hard labour, in default of payment. (1) IScllliiii; Things Unlit for Food.— Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to one year's imprisonment who knowingly and wilfully exposes for sale or has in his possession, with intent to sell, for human food, articles which he knows to be unfit for human food. Punishment, on conviction for a subsequent offence, — 2 years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 194.) Fertilizers. — " Fertilizer" means and includes eveiy natural or artificial manure which is sold at more than $10 per ton, and which contains phosphoric acid, nitrogen, ammonia or nitric acid. (53 Vic, c. 24, sec. 2 b.) Under the Fertilisers Act, 1890, every person who sells or offers or exposes for sale any fertilizer, in respect of which the provisions of the Act have not been complied with, is liable to a penalty not exceeding $50 for the first offence and to a penalty not exceeding $100 for each subsequent offence, besides forfeiture of the fei-tilizer in respect of which the conviction is had. (lb., sec. 14.) And the penalty for forging or uttering or using, knowing it to be forged, any manufacturer's certificate, bill of inspection, certificate of analysis or inspector's tag required under the Act, is liable to two years' imprisonment with or without hard labour. (lb., sec 15.) Forcible Entry and Detainer. Forcible entry is where a person, whether entitled or not, enters in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace, or reasonable apprehension thereof, on land then in actual and peaceable pos- session of another. (1) 56 Vic., c 37, sec. 3. 542 PRACTICAL GUIDK TO MAQISTKATES. 2. Forcible detainer is where a person in actual possession of land, without color of right detains it in a manner likely to cause a breach of the peace, or reasonable apprehension thereof, against a person entitled by law to the possession thereof. 3. What amounts to actual possession or color of right is a ques- tion of law. 4. Every one who forcibly enters or forcibly detains land is guilty of an- indictable otl'ence and liable to one year's imprison- ment. (Code, Art. 89.) Foreign Sovereigns. Ijlbels on Foreign Stovcrcigns. —Hlvery one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to one year's imprisonment who, without lawful justification, publishes any libel tending to degrade, revile or expose to hatred and contempt in the esti- mation of the people of any foreign state any prince or jjerson exercising sovereign atithority over any such state. (Code, Art. 125.) A French refugee in England was held amenable to the law of England for having written a poem suggesting that it Avould be a heroic deed to assassinate Napoleon Bonaparte, and was found guilty by an English jury, although the libel was purely political and attacked England's greatest enemy. (1) Forgery. Definition. — Forgery is the making of a false document knowing it to be false, with the intention that it shall in any way be used or acted upon as genuine, to the prejudice of any one whether within Canada or not, or that some person should be in- duced, by the belief that it is genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything, whether within Canada or not. 2. Making a false document includes altering a genuine docu- ment in any material part, and making any material ar'dition to it or adding to it any false date, attestation, seal or other thing which (1) R. v. Peltier, 28 How- St. Tr. 617. See also R. v. Moat, 7 Q. B. D. 244. FORGEBV. 643 is materittl, ov hj making any material alteration in it, either by erasure, obliteration, removal or otherwise. 3. Forgery is complete as soon as the document is made with such knowledge and intent as aforesaid, though the otfender may not have intended that any particular person should use or act upon it as genuine, or be induced, by the belief that it is"genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything. 4. Forgery is complete although the false document may be in- complete, or may not purport to be such a'document as would be binding in law, if it be so made as, and is such as to indicate that it was intended, to be acted on as genuine. (Code, Art. 422.) ]fleaiiiuff of* «' Dociiiueii V ««Baiik IVotc '' «* Ex- chequer Bill" "False ]>oeiiBiieiit." — A document means, in this part, any paper, parchment, or other material used for writing or printing, mai*ked with matter capable'of being read, but does not include trade marks on articles ^of commerce, or insci'iptions on stone or metal or other like material. (Code, Art. 419.) " Bank note " includes all negotiable instruments issued by or on behalf of any person, body corporate, or company carrying on the business of banking in any part of the world, or issued by the authority of the Parliament of Canada or of any foreign prince, or government, or any governor or other authority lawfully author- ized thereto in any of Her Majesty's dominions, and intended to be used as equivalent to money, either immediately uj^on their issue at or some time subsequent thereto, and all bank bills and bank post bills ; (c) " Exchequer bill " includes exchequer bonds, notes, deben- tures and other securities issued under the authority of the Parlia- ment of Canada, or under the authority of any legislature of any province forming part of Canada, whether before or after such province so became a part of Canada. (Code, Art. 420.) The expression '■^ fahe document" means — (a) a document the whole or some material part of which pur- ports to be made by or on behalf of any person who did not make or authorize the making thereof, or which, though made by, or by 644 PRACTICAL QUIDS TO MAQISTRATKa. the authority of, the person who purports to make it, is falsely dated as to time or place of making, where either is matenal ; or (6)''a document the whole or some material part of which pur- ports to be made by or on behalf of some person who did not in fact exist ; or , • ;, r - , (c.) a document which is made in the name of an existing per- son either by that person or by his authority, with the fraudulent intention that the document should pass as being made by some person, real or fictitious, other than the person who makes or authorizes it. ' ., 2. It is not necessary that the fraudulent intention should appear on the face of the document, but it maj'^ be proved by external evidence. (Code, Art. 421.) The gist of the offence of forgery, as defined by the Code is the knowinyly making of any false document, (defined by article 421), either, 1, with intent, that such false document shall be used or act- ed upon as genuine," to the prejudice of any one, or 2, vcith in- tent that any one shall, by, belief in its genuineness, be induced to do or refrain from doing anything ; and it is expressly declared by article 422, that making shall include any material alteration in or addition to a genuine document ; and that the forgery shall be complete as soon as the false document is made, " with such know- ledge and intent as aforesaid." It is unnecessary that the forgery should reach the i)oint of being actually used or acted upon as genuine, or that it should have actually prejudiced any one. As soon as the false document is made with intent that it shall be acted upon or used as genuine, it is sufficient ; and the forgery is comiilete without any further step being taken, and therefore without any uttering of it. For, although the publication or uttering of the instrument is the usual medium by w^hich the intent is made manifest, the intent may be proved as plainly' by other evidence. The intent necessary is an intent that the false document shall be used or acted upon as genuine to some one's prejudice, or that some one shall be led by belief in its genuineness to do or refrain from doing something ; and therefore, a man, who makes a false note, and issues and gets_money or anything on it will have led ' POROKRY. 545 8omo one to act on it as genuine, and will ho guilty of forgery, al- though ho may mean to take it up, and even if he actually does take it up, at maturity. (1) It is forgery to execute a deed in the name of, and as roprescnt- ing another person, with intent to defraud, even though the pri- soner has a power of attorney from such person, but fraudulently conceals the fact of his being only such attorney, and assumes to be the i^rincipal. (2) If a bill of exchange, payable to A. B. or order, get into the hands of another person of the same name with the payee, and such person knowing that he is not the real payee, in whose favour it was drawn, indorse it, for the purpose of fraudulently possess- ing himself of 'he money, he is guilty of forgery. (3) The general principle upon which making a false document in- cludes altering or adding to a genuine one, (as provided by the se- cond paragraph of article 422), is that an alteration of any mater- ial part of a true instrument changes and falsifies the whole. > Upon an indictment for " making, forging and conterfeiting " a bill of exchange, and for uttering it knowing it to be forged, the prisoners were convicted upon evidence of an alteration of the bill, from £10 to £50. (4) Where a party committing forgery jises a name different from his own, it is immaterial whether the name used be that of f. per- son actually existing or that of a merely fictitious person who never existed. (See Article 421 b.) It is as much a forgery in the one case as in the other. (5) Where the forgery is committed by using the name of an exist- ing person, it makes no difference whether the offender passes him- self off for such person or not. (6) (1) R. v. Hill, 2 Moo. C. C. R., 30; R, v. Cooke,8 C. & P., 582 ; R. v. Geach 9 C. & P., 499. (2) R. V. Gould, 20 U. C C. P., 169. (3 1 Mead v. Young, 4 T. R., 28. (4) R. V. Teague, 2 East, P. C, 979 ; R. «& R. 33. See R. v. Dawson, 1 Str. 19. (5) R. V. Parkes, 2 Leach, 773. (6) R. V. Dunn, 1 Leach, 57. 54() I'RACTIOAI, UIJIDE TO MAUIHTHATES. A person (MKlorwiiif^ u fictititMis naiiu* mi a liill of ('xcluiiigc to givo it currency, will lio miilty of for^oiy, and in ii cawo wliicli was Htatod to till' judges, tliey were all of opinion that a bill ol" exchange drawn in Hctitious names, when thovo are no sucdi persons oxisiting as the bill imports, was u forged bill. (1) If three jiersons. A, H and 0, have authority jointly to draw out money from a bank, and A, one of them, draw out the money by a cheque signed by himself and D and E, two strungors wlio por- sonnto B and C, it is forgery. (2) Tf a person write an accoptancc in his own name to represent a fictitious yirm, with intent to defraud, it is a forged acceptance ; for if an acceptance represent a tlctitious yir/n, it is the same as if it represented a fictitious person. (3) It is immaterial whether any additional credit bo gained by using the false name. (4) ^ But it has been held that where a man, who had long been known by a fictitious name, drew a bill in that name, it was not a forgery. (5) It is forgery for a pei'son, having authority to fill up a blank acceptance or a cheque for a certain sum, to fill it up for a larger amount. (G) Filling in, without authority, the body of a blank cheque,, to which a signature is attached, is a forgery. (Y) If a person put the name of another on a bill of exchange as acceptor without the other's authority, expecting to be able to meet it when due, or expecting that such other person will over- look it, it is forgery. But if the person either had authority from such other person, or, from the course of their dealings, bona fide considered that he had such authority, it is not forgery. (8) (1) R. V. Wilks, 2 East, P. C. 957; Ex parte Cadby, 26 S. C. N, B. 452. (2) R. V. Dixon. 2 Lew. 178. (3) R. V. Roclgers, 8 C. & P. 629. (4) R. V. Taft. 1 Leach, 172. ^ee R. v. Marshall, R. & R. 75. (6) R. V. Aickles, 2 East, P. C. 968. , • (6) R. V. Minter Hart, 1 Mood, C. C. 486. (7) R. V. Wright, 1 Lew. 135. " ' (8) R. V. Forbes, 7 C. & P. 224 ; R. v. Hill, 8 C. & P. 274. FoRilKUY. ] 547 I'lliiiNllillcili. — Tho |)uiiiHliin('iitH tor forgery raii^'t) from iinprisoiunont for lifu to Hovt'ii yoiirH' iiii|iriHoiiiiiont, ncconliiig to the iHirpovt of the docuiiu'iit forged. (Si'o Artk'k' 423 of the Codo.) Tlio |)uiiiHhinoiit for forgciy of any dociinu'iit not enuniorutcd in Artiolc 423 is, under tho lil^st oluuso of that Artitdo, sovon yours imprisonmunt. I'roof*. — TImt tho Migntitiiro or otlier part of tho inHtnnuent nUoged to bo forged is not of the handwriting of the party may be ])roved by an}' person uequaintod with his handwriting, either from having seen him write, or from Ijeing in the habit of corres- ponding with him. (1) It is sulHciont.pn'nw facie, to disprove his handwriting, and ho need not i)o called to disprove an autiiority to others to use his' name. (2) As to ])roof jjy comi)arison of writings, see Evidence, p. 523, ante. Evidence must bo given of the identity of the party whose hand- writing is forged ; that is, it must bo proved, expressly, or from circumstances, that tho alleged forgery was intended to roj)rosont tho handwriting of tho person whoso handwriting it is proved not to be, or that it was intended as tho handwriting of a person who never existed. (3) > Utter in|^ f'orKOil dociiiiiciitN. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable ott'once who, Jcnowing a document to be forged, uses, deals with, or acts upon it, or attempts to use, deal with, or act upon it, or causes or attempts to cause any person to use, deal with, or act upon it, as if it were genuine, and is liable to the same punishment as if he had forged the document. 2. It is immaterial where the document was foi-ged. The mere showing of a forged receipt, to a person with whom tho defendant was claiming credit for it, has been held to be an utter- ing, although the defendant refused to part with tho possession of it. (4) .: , . ..■ ■ . .; * (1) Garrells v. Alexander, 4 Esp. 37 ; Gould v. Jones, 1 W. Bl. 384 ; Hai- rington v. Fry, R. & M. 99 ; R. v. Horn Tooke, 25 How. St.Tr. 71, 72. (2) R. V. Harley, 2 M. & Rob. 473. (3) R. V. Sponsonby, 2 East P. C. 996, 997. (4) R. y. Radford, 1 C. & K. 707. 64S PRAOTICAI. OinOK TO MAdlSTKATKH. A. |)liu't'(l 11 for>?t.iil roooipt for jxxn'-mtt'H in tho haiirls of H., for the |)ur;)Ose of iiiH|UH'tion only, in onlor, by roprtwntin^ liiniBoIf uh n poi'Hon whoso poor-rutos wen* paid, t(t fniudulently induce B. to advance moiioy to C, for whom lie, A., |)ropoHod to l)e('oine surety for itH repayment. Held to ho an uttering : the rule there hiid down by the ('oiirt l)eing that a using of the forgod instrument in Bomo way, in order to get money or credit on it, or by means of it, IB BuiHuiont to constitute the u uico of uttoring. (I) On an indictment for uttering forged bonds in Knghind, it was held that such uttering was sutHciently proved by evidence of the bonds having boon posted in England to a tirm at Hrussols for ne- gotiation. (2) The giving of a forgod note to an innocent agent, or to an ac- complice is a disposing of and putting away of tho note. (3) Upon an indictment for uttering a forgod bank-note, knowing it to be forged, proof that the defendant had passed other forged notes, when proved by legitimate evidence, was held to raise a pro- bable presumption that he know the particular note in question to be fo.ged. (4) FORTITNE TEM.INO. witchcraft. Tor tune-telling;, Ac. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to one year's imprisonment who pretends to exercise or use any kind of witchcraft, sorcery, en- chantment or conjuration, or undertakes to toll fortunes, or protends from his skill and knowledge in an}' occult or crafty science, to discover where or in what manner any goods or chattels supposed to have been stolen or lost may bo found. (Code, Art. 396.) . Fraud. !Det*rau«1in)|; C'rcdltorn. — Every one is guilty of an indict- able offence and liable to a fine of eight hundred dollars and to one year's imprisonment who — (1) R. v. Ion, 21 L.J. M. C. 166. (2) R. V. Finklestein, 15 Cox. 107. (3) R. V. Palmer, 1 N. R. 93; R. & R. 72. (4) R. V. Millard, R. & R. 245 ; R. v. Colclough, 15 Cox, (Ir. C. C. R.) 92. FRAl-D. fi49 (a.) with intent to (lofnuui his cruditopH, or any of thorn, (i.) niiiltoH, or cruhos to bo niRdo, ftny gifY, convoyanco, VHsign- ment, Hale, trauHf'or or dolivory of hiw property ; (ii.) removes, conceals or disposes of any of his property ; or (b.) with the intont iiiat anN one whall so defraud his creditorn, or any of thorn, receives any siu'l property. (Code, Art. 368.) Every one is guilty of jm indictable otlonce and liable to ten yeai-s' imprisonment who, with intent to defraud his creditors, or any of them, destroys, alters, mutilates or falsifies any of his books, papers, writings or securities, or makes, or is privy to the making of any false or fraudulent entry in any book of account or other document. (Code, Art. 3(J1>.) ConvealiiiK DeedNor Kiicunibranc€>Mor Falwlty- iug P4Mli){r<'«>N. — Kvery ono is guilty of an indictable ott'once and liable to a tine, or to two years' imprisonment, or to both, who, be- ing a seller or mortgagor of land, or of any chattels, real or per- sonal, or chose in action, or the solicitor or agent of any such seller or mortgagor (and having been served with a written de- mand of an abstract of title by or on belialf of the purchaser or mortgagee before the coinj)letion of the purchase or mortgage) conceals any settlement, deed, will or other instrument material to the title, or any encumbrance, from such purchaser or mortgagee, or falsities any j)edigree upon which the title depends, with intent to defraud and in order to induce such purchaser or mortgagee to accept the title ottered or produced to him. (Code, Art. 370.) FraiidN in roNpoct to the Kt'KlNtration of'Titlefi to K<aiillN. — Kvery ono is guilty of an indictable ott'ence and liable to three years' imprisonment who, acting either as principal or agent, in any proceeding to obtain the registration of any title to land or other wise, or in any transaction relating to land which is, or is proposed to bo, put on the register, knowingly and with intent to deceive, makes or assists or joins in, or is privy to the making of any material false statement or representation, or suppresses, conceals, assists or joins in, or is privy to the suppression, with- holding or concealing from any judge or registrar, or any person employed by or assisting the registrar, any material document, fact or matter of information. (Code, Art. 371.) 550 PRACTICAL aUIDE TO MAQISTRATKS, Fraii«lulciit MaloM of Kcal Property. ^Evory one is guilty of an indictable oflfence and liable to one year's im- prisonment and to a fine not exceeding $2,000 who, knowing the existence of any unregistered .prior sale, grant, mortgage, hypo- thec, privilege or encumbrance of or upon any real property, fraudulently makes any subsequent sale of the same or of any part thereof (Code, Art. 372.) Frau«lnlently Hypothevatlni; or Jn[ort|;agIng Real Property. — Every one who pretends to hypothecate mortgage, or otherwise charge any real property to which he knows ho has no legal or equitable title, is guilty of an indictable otfence and liable to one year's imprisonment, and to a fine not exceeding $100. 2. The proof of the ownership of the real estate rests with the person so pretending to deal with the same. (Code, Art. 373.) Fraudulent (Seizures of* I^and. — Every one is guilty of an indictable otfence and liable to one year's imprisonment, who, in the province of Quelec, wilfully causes or procures to be seized and taken in execution, any lands or tenements or other real pro- perty, not being at the time of such seizure, to the knowledge of the person causing the same to be taken in execution, the bona fide property of the person or persons against whom or whose estate the execution is issued. (Code, Art. 374.) Fraudulent deallngpi In Oold or l§illver by Ijessees of Mines.— (See Art. 375 of the Code.) Olving or using false Warehouse Receipts. — Every one is guilty of an indictable otfence and liable to three years' imprisonment who — (a.) being the keeper of any warehouse, or a forwarder, miller, master of a vessel, wharfinger, keeper of a cove, yard, harbour or other place for storing timber, deals, staves, boards, or lumber, curer or packer of pork, or dealer in wool, carrier, factor, agent or other person, or a clerk or other person in his employ, knowingly and wilfully gives to any person a writing purporting to be a receipt for, or an acknowledgment of, any goods or other property FRAUD. 551 as having been received into his warehouse, vessel, cove, wharf, or other place, or in any such place about which he is employed, or in any other manner received by him, or by the person in or about whose business he is employed before the goods or other property named in such receipt, acknowledgment or writing have been actually delivered to or received by him as aforesaid, with intent to mislead, deceive, injure or defraud any person, although such person is then unknown to him ; or (6.) knowingly and wilfully accepts, transmits or uses any such false receipt or acknowledgment or writing. (Code, Art. 376.) OwiicrN of merchandise disponing thereof con- trary to agreeincntH with Consignees who have made advances therein. — Every one is guilty of an indict- able offence and liable to three years' imprisonment, who — (a.) having in his name, shipped or delivered to the keeper of any warehouse, or to any other factor, agent or carrier, to be shipped or carried, any merchandise upon which the consignee has advanced any money or given any valuable security, afterwards, with intent to deceive, defraud or injure such consignee, in violation of good faith, and without the consent of such consignee, makes any disposition of such merchandise different from and inconsistent with the agreement made in that behalf between him and such consignee at the time of or before such money was so advanced or such negotiable security so given ; or (6.) knowingly and wilfully aids and assists in making such dis- position for the purpose of deceiving, defrauding or injuring such consignee. ' - 2. No person commits an offence under this section who, before making such disposition of such merchandise, pays or tenders to the consignee the full amount of any advance made thereon. (Code, Art. 377.) Making false statements in Receipts for Pro- perty that can be used under the Bank Act; or iVaudulently dealing with such Property. — £very person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to tnree years' imprisonment who — 552 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAUISTRATES. (a.) wilfully makes any f'ulso statement in any receipt, certificate or jkcknowledgment for grain, timber or other property which can be used for any of the purposes mentioned in the Bank Act ; or (6.) having given any receipt, etc., iov grain, etc., or having obtained any such receipt and passed over to any bank or peraon fraudulently deals with such property. (Code, Art. 378.) Iliiioceiit Partners,— If any offence mentioned in Articles 3*76, 37V and 378 is committed in the name of a firm, company or co-partnei-ship, the pei-son by whom the thing is actually done or who connives at the doing thereof is guilty of the offence and not any other person. (Code, Art. 379.) FRAUDULENT MARK[NO OF MBRCHVNDIZE. (See Trade Marks, post.) FUGITIVE OFFENDERS. (See Appendix, poit.) FURIOUS DRIVING. Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' imprisonment who, having the charge of any carriage or vehicle, by wanton or furious driving, or racing, or other wilful misconduct, or by wilful neglect, does or causes to be done any bodily harm to any pei-son. (Code, Art. 253.) gambling. Oanibling in Pul>llc Conveyances. — Everyone is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to one year's imprison- ment who — (a.) in any railway car or steamboat, used as a public convey- ance for passengers, by means of any game of cards, dice or other instrument of gambling, or by any device of like character, obtains from any other pereon any money, chattel, valuable security or property ; or (6.) attempts to commit such offence by actually engaging any person in any such game with intent to obtain money or other valuable thing from him. GAMBMNG. — GAME. 553 2. Every conductor, master or superior officer in charge of, and every clerk or employee when authorised by the conductor or su- perior otflcer in charge of, any railway train or steamboat, station or landing place where any such oti'ence is comditted or attempted, must, with or Avithout warrant, arrest any person whom ho has good reason to believe to have committed or attempted to commit the same, and take him before a justice of the peace, and make complaint of such ottence on oath, in wi-iting. 3. Every such conductor, master or superior officer who makes default in the discharge of any such duty is liable, on summary conviction, to a penalty not exceeding one hundred dollars and not less than twenty dollars. 4. Every company or person who owns or works any such rail- way car or steamboat must keep a copy of this section posted up in some conspicuous part of such railway car or steamboat. 5. Every company or person who makes default in the discharge of such duty is liable to a penalty not exceeding one hundred dol- lars and not less than twenty dollars. (Code, Art. 203.) GAME. Quebec. — It is forbidden, in the province of Quebec, to hunt, kill, or take, — 1. Deer, between the first of January and the first of October in each yeai-, or, moose and caribou between the first of February and the first of September in each year. It is also for- bidden to make use of dogs for hunting, killing or taking moose, caribou, or deer. (E. S, Q. Art. 1396 ; 62 Vic. (Que.), c. 19, sec. 1.) No person shall have a right, unless he is domiciled in the pro- vince, and has previously obtained a permit from the Commissioner of Crown Lands for that purpose, to kill or take alive, during one season, more than two moose, three deer and two caribou. Such permit shall be granted only when deemed advisable and upon payment of a fee of 05, and can in no case authorize the taking of more than five additional caribou and five additional deex". The Commissioner may exempt from the payment of snob ftsi) any In- dian, whose povei'ty has been established to his satisfaction. (R. S. Q., Art. 1398.) For restrictions as to hunting, killing, or taking beaver, mink. 554 PBAOriOAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. otter, rairten, pekan, have, and musk-rat, or woodcock, snipe, par- tridge, wild duck, blaclv duck, teal, etc, see R. S. Q., Arts. 1401- 1407. Every game-keeper, if he has reason to suspect and if he suspect that game killed or taken during the close season, or peltries or skins out of season, are contained or kept in any private house, store, shed or ^other buildings, can, upon making a deposition to that effect, obtain from a justice of the peace a search warrant to search such house, store or building. (R. S. Q., Art. 1408.) Every infringement of the Quebec Game Laws is punishable summarily ; and prosecutions may be brought either by the game- keeper or by any other before a justice of the peace of the district in which the offence was committed, or the seizure or confiscation effected. (R. S. Q., Art. 1410.) But no prosecution shall be brought after three calendar months from the day of the commit- ting of the offence charged. (R. S. Q., Art. 1412.) The fines for infringements of the Quebec Game Laws are set forth in Article 1410 of the R. S. Q. Ontario. — The law on the subject is contained in the 56 Vic. (Ont.), c. 49. IJiiorgaiiized Portlonii of the IVorth West Ter- ritories. — It is enacted by section 4 of the Unorganized Territories Game Freseroation Act, 1894, (57-58 Vic. (Can.), c. 31), that, except as thereinafter provided, buffalo and bison shall not be hunted, taken, killed, shot at, w^ounded, injured, or molested, at any time of the year until the first day of January 1900. By sections 5 and 7 of the Act, it is enacted that except as there- inafter provided, the following beasts and birds shall not be hunted, taken, killed, etc., during the following times of the year resjject- ively : (a.) Musk oxen, between the 20th of March and the 15th of October ; (6.) Elk or wapiti, moose, cariboo, deer, mountain sheep and mountain goats, between the first day of April and the 15th day of July, and between the first day of October and the first day of December ; GAME. — OAMINO. 556 (c.) Minks, fishers and martens, — between the 15th March and the first day of November ; (d.) Ottere and beavers, — between the 15th of May and the first day of October ; (e.) Muskrats,— between the 15th of May and the first day of October ; (/.) Grouse, partridges, pheasant and prairie chickens, — between the first day of January and the first day of September ; (g.) Wild swans, wild ducks and wild geese, — between the fif- teenth day of January and the first day of September ; and No eggs in the nest of any bird above mentioned, — at any time of the year. . Section 8 contains exceptions, allowing the hunting, taking and killing of the above beasts and birds (except buttalo, bison or musk oxen in their close seasons) — (a.) by Indian inhabitants and other inhabitants of the country to which the act applies ; (6.) by explorers, surveyors or travellers in actual need of the beasts, birds, or eggs for food ; and (c.) by any person having a permit to do so granted under the Act. The Act applies only to the portions of the North-West Terri- tories not included within the provisional districts of Assiniboia, Alberta and Saskatchewan ; and it applies to the district of Kee- watin. (Section 2.) The Act provides for the appointment and remuneration of game guardians and constables, and the infliction of penalties for viola- tions of the Act, which, as to the general provisions thereof, is to come into force on the first of January, 1896. The " Game Ordinance " No 8, of 1893, of the Provincial Legis- lature of the N. W. T. is not to apply to the country in which the Act is in force. Gaminq. Gaming^ In Sltockfi, etc. — Every one is guilty of an indict- able offence and liable to five years' imprisonment, and to a fine of 36 556 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MA0ISTRATB8. tivo hundred dollars, who, with the intent to mako gain or profit by the rise or fall in price of any stock of any incorporated or un- incorporated company or undertaking, either in Canada or else- where, or of anj' goods, wares or merchandise — (a.) without the bona fide intention of acquiring any such shares, goods, wares or mei-chandise, or of selling the same, as the case may be, makes or signs, or authorizes to bo made or signed, any contract or agreement, oral or written, purporting to be for the sale or purchase of any such shares of stock, goods, wares or merchandise : or (b.) makes or signs, or authorizes to be made or signed, any contract or agreement, oral or written, purporting to be for the sale or purchase of any such shares of stock, goods, wares or mer- chandise in respect of which no delivery of the thing sold or puchased is made or received, and without the bona fide intention to make or receive such delivery. 2. But it is not an offence if the broker of the purchaser receives delivery, on his behalf, of the article sold, notwithstanding that such broker retains or pledges the same as security for the advance of the purchase money or any part thereof. 3. Every office or place of business wherein is carried on the business of making or signing, or procuring to be made or signed, or negotiating or bargaining for the making or signing of such contracts of sale or puchase as are prohibited in this section is a common gaming-house, and every one who as principal or agent occupies, uses, manages or maintains the same is the keeper of a common gaming-house. (Cnde, Art. 201.) By Article 704 of the Code, the omis of proving a bona fide inten- tion to sell or purchase shares or goods is thrown upon the person accused of gaming in stocks. Frequenting Bucket Shops. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to one year's imprisonment who habi- tually frequents any office or place wherein the making or signing, or procuring to be made or signed, or the negotiating or bargain- ing for the making or signing of such contracts of sale or purchase as are mentioned in section 201 is carried on. (Code, Art. 202.) COMMON GAMING HOUSES. 557 GAMING HOUSES. Coiiiiiioii <i}aiiiiiiK-lIoiiise. — A common gaming-houso is — (a.) a house, room or place kept by any ])er8on for gain, to which persons resort for the purpose of playing at any game of chance ; or (6.) a house, room or place kept or used for playing therein at any game of chance, or any mixed game of chance and skill, in which — (i.) a bank is kept by one or more of the players exclusively of the others ; or (ii.) in which any game is played the chances of which are not alike favourable to all the players, including among the players, the banker or other person by whom the game is managed, or against whom the game is managed, cr against whom the other playei-s stake, play or bet. (Code, Art. 196.) Keeping^ a Common Oaming-IIouse. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to one year's imprison- ment who keeps any disorderly house, that is to say, any common bawdy-house, common gaming-house or common betting-house,, as hereinbefore detined. 2. Any one who appears, acts, or behaves as master or mistress, or as the person having the care, government or management, of any disorderly house shall be deemed to be the keeper thereof, and shall bo liable to be prosecuted and punished as such, although in fact he or she is not the real owner or keeper thereof. (Code, Art. 198.) Evidence of a Place being a Common Oaming- House. — When any cards, dice, balls, counters, tables or other in- struments of gaming used in playing any unlawful game are found in any house, room, or place, suspected to be used as a common gaming- house, and entered under a warrant or order issued under the Code, or about the person of any of those who are found therein, it shall be prima facie evidence on the trial of a prosecution, under Article 198 of the Code, that such house, room or place is used as 658 PRACTICAL OUIDB TO MAQISTRATBS. a common gaming-liouse, and that the persons found in the room or place whore such tables or instruments of gaining are found wore PLAYING TiiKREiN, although no play was actually going on in the presence of the chief constable or other otflcer entering the same under the Code, or in the presence of the persons by whom he is accompanied. (Code, Art. 702.) It will also bo prima facie evidence, — in any prosecution for keeping a common gaming-house, under Article 198 of the Code, — that a house, room or place is used as a common gaming-house, and that the persons found therein were unlawfully playing therein. (a.) if any constable or oflScer authorized to enter any house, room or place, is wilfully prevented from or obstructed or delayed in entering the same or any part thereof ; or (6.) if any such house, room or place is found litted or provided with any means or contrivance for unlawful gaming or with any means or contrivance for concealing removing or destroying any instruments of gaming. (Code, Art. 703.) In a recent Ontario case (decided 23 June, 1894), a defendant was indicted under Article 198 of the Code, for keeping a common gaming house at Fort Erie, (Ont.), and was convicted upon evidence showing, 1, that he was the person appearing to have the care, government or management of the house ; 2, that the game carried on therein was the game of " policy," the implements used being a wheel, a quantity of numbers, — 1 to 78, — on printed slips, and a board with the same numbers painted thereon ; and, 3, that the manner of playing the game, as carried on by the defendant was as follows : — In Buffalo, (U. S.), there were scattered a number of agencies, where persons desirous of playing went, and there select- ed three of the numbers 1 to 78. The player marked down his numbers on two slips, one of which he gave to the agent, the other he retained, and, at the same time, he paid whatever sum (five or ten cents being the ordinary amount) he desired to stake. The agent delivered these slips and the money so staked to the defen- dant's head office, which was also in Buffalo. In Fort Brie, the other part of the game, namely, determining the winning or losing numbers, was carried on, as follows : The operator went each day, at 12 and at 5 o'clock, to the room where the wheel was kept. He had the individual numbers from 1 to 78, in small individual COMMON GAMINa HOUSES. , 559 boxes, — ono in oach box. Tboso boxes ho deposited in the wheel, — a hollow wheel, resembling a choose box, with glass sides ; and aftoi' revolving the wheel, so as to shufHe the boxes, ho opened tho wheel, withdrew twelve of tho boxes, and called out the numbers contained on the slips therein. He then returned the numbers to the boxes, closed the boxes, deposited them in the wheel, and again wont through the same operation of revolving the wheel to shuttle tho boxes, and of withdrawing twelve, the numborsj^in which ho also road out. Having done this, he telegraphed those numbere, which were the winning ones, — to the head office in Buffalo where printed slips were issued and delivered to the ditt'eront agencies. A player who had chosen three of tho numbers ap- pearing on these slips was a winner and got $2 for oach cent staked by him ; but all tho three numbers chosen by him must bo winning ones in order for him to win ; and tho odds were in favor of the banker or person by whom the game was managed. The only thing done in Canada was the revolving of the wheel and the determining of the winning numbers. The money was staked, and, if won, paid in Buff'alo. Tho implements used in the game were instruments of gaming under Article 702 of the Code ; and it was proved that tho house where tho implements wore used was entered by tho constable (who made the arrest of the defendant) under a search warrant properly issued, that the defendant was there in tho same room where the implements were, and that these implements were seized and retained by the constable until the trial ; and there was no evidence, on behalf of the defendant, that there was ,no gaming going on in the house, to meet the prima facie case established un- der Article 702. The question of whether the defendant was properly convicted of the offence charged was reserved for the opinion of the High Court ; and that Court held that the object of the statute was to ■ save tho unwary from hurtful temptation, to protect the residents of Canada from the injury resulting to them and to society at large from the waste of their substance in gaming ; that it was not to be supposed that the legislation was for the protection of the resi- dents in a foreign state ; that the use of a gaming instrument in PRACTICAL aUIDE TO MAOI8TKATE8. this country for deciding who wore the winnorH of money Htaked, and, if won, paid in a foreign country is not gaming here ; that, in order to constitute gaming, there must bo a stake of some kind, and, there being no stake in'this country, there coukl be no violation of the hiw against gaming'iiERE ; that the statute does not reach such a case as this ; and that the conviction must be quashed. (1) Playing or looking on In Oanilng-HouNe. — Every one who jjlays or looks on while any other person is playing in a common gaming-house is guilty of an offence and liable, on sum- mary conviction before two justices of the peace, to a penalty not exceeding one hur "i-od dollars, and not less than twenty dollars and, in default of payment to two months' imprisonment. (Codci Art. 199.) •, Obmtructlng; Peace Ofltleer entering Oanilng- HoUNe. — Every one is guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction before tw(^ jueticesof the peace, to a penalty not exceeding one hundred dollara, and to six months' imprisonment with or with- out hard labour who — (a.y wilfully prevents any constable or other officer, — duly authorized to enter any disorderly house, as mentioned in section 198, — from entering the same or any part thereof ; or (6.) obstructs or delaj's any such constable or officer in so enter- ing ; or, (c.) by any bolt, chain, or other contrivance, secures any external or internal door of, or means of access to, any common gaming-house so authorized to bo entered ; or (d.) uses any means or contrivance whatever for the purjiose of preventing, obstructing or delaying the entry of any constable or officer authorized as aforesaid, into such a'sorderly house or any part thereof. (Code, Art. 200.) Searching Oanilng-HonseH. — (,See pp. 124-120, ante.) See Bbttino Houses, and comments and authorities, at pp. 471- 473, ante. (1) R. v. Wittman. 25 Ont. R. 469. 14 C.L.T. 447. HOMICIDE. 661 OA8. Criinlnul Breach of Contract to Mupply Wait. — (See CONTRACT, p. 508, anfc.) (SOO INSPECTION, pOS*.) "* ^ ' ! , ,.,"», ' URAIN. ■ , .'.';' ■ ■.'■•■, Iiitimidatlon of Dealer* in <i}rain.— (Hoc intimida- tion, poa^ HABEAS CORPUS. See p. 36S, ante. HARBOR MASTERS. The Harbor Matters Act, (R. S. C. c. 86, as amended by 57-68 Vic. c. 50) authorizes the Governor in Council to appoint harbor masters and deputy harbor masters, and to make regulations in reference to their rights, powers and duties. HAWKERS. . (See Peddlers, post.) HOLES AND EXCAVATIONS. (See Negligence, post.) HOMICIDE. Definition. — Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever. (Code, Art. 218.) By Article 219 of the Code, a child becomes a human being when it has compkUly proceeded, in a living state, from the body of its mother, whether it has breathed or not, whether it has an indejiondout circulation or not, and whether the navel string is severed or not. And the killing of such child is homicide when it dies in consequence of injuries received before, during or after birth. Culpable homicide. — Homicide is culpable when it con- sists in the killing of any person, either by an unlawful act or by an omission, without lawful excuse, to perform or observe 8fi2 PRAOTIOAt. OUIDR TO MACHHTRATKH. ANY i.RUAL Di'TY, or hy both ('oml)ino(l, or by oaiihino a ikm'moii, iiv TIIREATH or KBAR OK VIOLKNOK, or HY DEOEI'TION to do Hl> lU'l wliicli ciiUNOH thiit ihm'hoh'h (lt»ath, or by \vitiKi'i,i,Y FiiKiiiTKNlNd a «'bil(| or nick person. 2. ('iilpablo homicide is uithor murdor or maiislau^htor. 3. Iloinicido which is not uulpublo in not an ottiMure. ((yode, Art. 220.) A man wiio hutl frightonod u oliild into convulwions, from tho oH'octs of wliich it ovontually diod, was convietod, before Denman, J., of manwlaughtor. (1) A man, wlio liad tai<un udvantagu of or had croiited a ]mnic in a theatre and had olwtructed a j)aHsage and rendered it ho ditfiuult to get out of the theatre that some peo|>le were crushed, wuh held unHwerubU) for the conHoquences of what he had done, (2) And where a woman, in order to oHcape from her huHband who hau used throats against her life, got out of a window, and in so doing fell and broke her leg, the husband was convicted of having wil- fully intlicted, upon her, grievous bodily harm. Qi) Pro«iiriii|( ]>eath by falNe evidence. — Procur- ing by false evidence the conviction and death of any pei'son by the sentence of the law shall not be deemed homicide. (Code, Art, 221.) (See PEBJuaY, jjoat.) Death iniiMt be within a Year and a Day. — No one is criminally responsible for the killing of another unless the death take place within a year and a day of the cause of death, (Code, Art. 222.) Killing by Influence on the INIInfl. — No one is criminally responsible for the killing of another by any influence on the mind, alone, nor for the killing of another by any disorder or disease arising from such influence, save, in either case, by WILFULLY FRtGHTFNiNa a child Or sick person. (Code, Art. 223,) (1) n. v. Towers, 12 Cox, C. C. 530. (2) R. V. Martin, 8 Q. B. D. 54. (3) R. v. Halliday, 51 L. J. Rep. (N. 8.) 701. IIOMICIUI. ft6li A reel prat Ion of ll<>atli.— Mvory oiu* who, by uny iirt III- oiniHHioii, (^huhch tlit) iloatli of iniotlior Uilh that perHon, although till* otViHtt of tlio hodily injury cuuMcd to MUch |>ors(»n ho moroly to accolorato hiw death \vhiU> hihouring uudor hoiuo tliMordor or disoaHo ariHiiig from Homo other cuumu. (("ode, A rt, 224.) Klllliiff when Hcntli iiilKlif ■■»¥« l»t'«ii Pre- v«>llt«>4l. — Kvery one, who, by uny act or omiHHion, causeH the death of another, killH that porHon, although deuth from that cuuho niight have been prevented by resorting to proper meunH. (Code, Art. 225.) For inHtan<'e, A injurew H'h tinger. B is advised by a surgeon to aUow it to be amputated, refuses to do ao, and dies of lockjaw. A huB killed B. (1) !Dp»tli following troatiU4>nt ol* Injury Inflieted. — Kvery one, who causes a bodily injury, which is of itself of a dan- gerous nature, to any pei-son, from which death results, kills that person, although the immediate cause of death be treatment proper or improper applied in good faith. (Code, Art. 22G.) A wounds B in a duel. Competent surgeons perform on B an operation which they, in good faith, consider necessary. B dio'n of the operation, the surgeons being mistaken as to the necessity of the operation. A has killed B. (2) ]yon-€ulpablc Homicide — JiMtillable and Kx- cudable. — Homicide which is not culpable may be either justifi- able or excusable. (8) JuHtiliablc Homicide. — is subdivided into, 1, Homicide done under the necessity arising in the exorcise of an otflce, which makes it compulsory — in executing public justice, under judicial command — to put to death a malefactor who has forfeited his life by the laws and verdict of his country ; and, 2, homicide which happens in the advancement of public justice, and in which the act, though not commanded, is permitted : as whei'e the killing (1) R. V. Holland, 2 Moo. & P. 351. (2) R. v. Pym, 1 Cox C. C. 339. (3) Broom's Com. L. 910, 564 VAAOTICAL QUIDS TO MAQISTRATES. happens in preventing crime, (1) or in the arrest of persons guilty or accused of crime,- or in preventing escapes or rescues from arrest or from custody, or in suppressing riots, etc. (2) Kxcufiable Homicide — is subdivided into, 1, Homicide per infortunium, or misadventure, and 2, homicide in self-defence, or ae defendendo. Accidental Homicide, — or homicide pet infortunium, is such as occurs where a man, in the doing of a lawful act, happens — without any negligence, and with no intention to injure — unfor- tunately, to kill another. For instance, if the head of a hatchet, with which a workman is working, flies oif and strikes 'and kills a bystander, it is excusable homicide by misadventure. (3) A whips a horse on which B is riding, in consequence of which the horse takes fright, and, before B can check him, runs over and kills C. This is accidental as to B, but it is manslaughter in A, for his act, being a trespass, was unlawful. (4) Homicide, In fiielf-Hel^nce, — is such as occurs where a man, being violently attacked, is obliged to kill his assailant in order to save his own life. The right of self-defence begins where necessity begins, and ends where necessity ends ; and, therefore, the defending party, in order to be excused, must exercise only such power and apply only such instruments as Avill simply prove effectual ;• nothing more. For instance, homicide to prevent a mere trespass is not justifiable. (5) And one, upon whom another (1) R. V. Huntley, 3 C. & K. 142. See, also, Art. 44 of the Code, which JUSTIFIES any one in using such force as may be reasonably necessary, in order to prevent the commission of any offence for which, if committed, the offender might be arrested without warrant, and the commission of which would be likely to cause immediate and serious injury to the person or property of any one, or, in order to prevent the doing of any act which he, on reasonable grounds, believes would, if committed, amount to any of such offences. (2) See Articles 31, 33 to 37, at pp. 98-100, anU, and also Articles 40-43 and 83 and 84, at pp. 481-484, ante. (3) 1 Hawk. P. C. c. 29, s. 2. (4) 4 Bl. Com. 182, 183. (5) R. v. Moir, Ann. Reg. (1830) vol. 72, p. 344. HOMICIDE. — MURDBR. 665 is making a mere assault with the fist, must not instantly stab him. (See Self Defence against Assaults, etc., at pp. 457-460, ante, and see Provocation, p. 669, post. Murder. — Culpable homicide is murder — (a.) If the offender means to cause the death of the person killed ; (6.) If the offender means to came to the person killed any bodily injury which is known to the ott'ender to be likely to cause death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not ; (c.) If the offender means to cause death or, being so recklesa us aforesaid, means to cause such bodily injury as aforesaid to one person, and by accident or mistake kills another person, though he does not mean to hurt the person killed ; (d.) If the offender, for any unlawful object, does an act which he knows or ought to have known to be likely to cause death, and thereby kills any person, though ho may have desired that his ob- ject should be effected without hurting any one. (Code, Art. 227.) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or not death to ensue, or knows or not that death is likely to ensue : (a.) If he meaiiK to inflict grievous bodily injury for the purpose of facilitating the commission of any of the offences in this section mentioned, or the flight of the offender upon the commission or attempted commission thereof, and death ensues from such injury ; or . . (6.) If he administci-s any stupefying or overpowering thing for either of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from the effects thereof ; or (c.) If he by any means wilfully stops the breath of any pei'son for either of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from such stopping of the breath. 2. The following are the offences in this section referred to , — Treason and the other offences mentioned in Part IV., of the Code, piracy and oft'ences deemed to be piracy, escape or rescue fi'om pri- 566 PBACTICAL GITIDE TO MAGISTRATES. son or lawful custody, resisting lawful apprehension, murder, rape, for- cible abduction, robbery, burglary, arson. (Code, Art. 228;) Puiiilliliiuent. — Every one who commits murder is guilty of an indictable ott'ence and nhall, on conviction thereof, be sentenced to death. ]>iielli]i|^. — (See Challenge to fight, p. 496, ante.) Attempts to murder. — Every one is guilty of an indict- able oft'ence and liable to imprisonment for life, who does any of the following things witli intent to commit murder ; that is to say— (a.) administers any poison or other destructive thing to any person, or causes any such poison or destructive thing to be so ad- ministered or taken, or attempts to administer it, or attempts to cause it to be so administex'ed or taken ; or (h.) by any means whatever wounds or causes any grievous bodily harm to any person ; or (c.) shoots at any person, or, by drawing a trigger or in any other manner, attempts to discharge at any 2:)erson any kind of loaded arms ; or (d.) attempts to drown, suffocate, or strangle any person ; or (e.) dest^'oys or damages any building by the explosioh of any explosive substance ; or (/.) sets tire to any ship or vessel or any part thereof or any part of the tackle, apparel or fui'niture thereof, or to any goods or chattels being therein ; or (g.) casts away or destroys any vessel ; or (h.) by any other means attempts to commit murder. (Code, Art. 232.) Where a female servant put arsenic into coffee which she pre- pared for breakfast, and afterwards told her mistress that the coffee was prepared, upon which the mistress drank the coffee, it was held that this was an administering. (1) (1) R. V. Harley, 4 C. & P. 369. HOMICIDE. — ATTEMPTS TO MURDER. 667 Where A knowingly gave poison to B. to administer as a medi- cine to C, but, B. neglecting to do so, it was accidentally given to C. by a child, this was held to be an administering by A. (1) A person, who fired a loaded pistol into a group of people, not aiming at any particular one, and who hit one of such group, was held guilty of shooting at the person he hit, with intent to do grievous bodily harm to that person. (2) Subsection (h) of the above Article 232, embracing as it does all attempts, by any other v>eans, to commit murder, will include all those cases where machinery used in lowering miners into mines is injured with intent that it shall break and precipitate the miners, who may be passing up or down, to the botton of the pit ; and also all cases where steam engines are injured for the purpose of killing any one, as well as the cases of sending or placing infernal machines with intent to murder. (3) Threats to Murder.— Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to ten years' imprisonment who sends, delivers or utters, or directly or indirectly causes to be received, knowing the contents thereof, any letter or writing threatening to kill or murder any person. (Code, Art. 233.) Conspiracy to ]9Iur4ler. — Every one is guilty of an in- dictable offence and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment, who — (a,) conspires or agrees with any person to murder or to cause to be murdered any other person, whether the ])erson intended to be murdered is a subject of Uer Majesty or not, or is within Her Majesty's dominions or not ; or (6.) counsels or attempts to procure any person to murder such other person anywhere, although such person is not murdered in consequence of such counselling or attempted procurement. Accessory after the Fact to IWurder, — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for (1) R. V. Michael, 9 C. & P. 356. (2) R. V. Fretwell, L. & C. 443; 33 L. J. M. C. 128. (3) R. V. Mountford, R. & M., C. C. 441 ; 7 C. «& P. 242. 568 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. life who is an accessory after the fact to murder. (Code, Art. 235.) (See CHILDBIRTH, p. 498, ante.) (See SUICIDE, post.) 9IaniilailK;l>ter. — Culpable homicide not amounting to murder is manslaughter. (Code, Art. 230.) Every one who commits manslaughter is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life. (Code, Art. 236.) Persons in charge of dangerous things, animate or inanimate, and persons engaged in erecting or making anything which, in the absence of due precaution or care, may endanger human life, are under a legal duty to guard against danger, (See Article 213 of the Code), and are criminally responsible for the consequences of omitting their duty, without lawful excuse. If a man, breaking an unruly or vicious horse, ride him into a crowd of people, and the horse kick and kill one of the pei-sons in the crowd, it would be murder, if the rider in bringing the horse into the crowd, meant to do mischief, or even if he meant to divert himself by frightening the crowd ; for, by reason of his intention to do mischief or to frighten people, he would be doing an unlawful act, which he knew or ought to know to be likely to cause some one's death. If his riding into the crowd were done not intentionally, but carelessly and incautiously only, he would be guilty of manslaughter. So, if a workman throw materials from a house in course of being erected or repaired, and thereby kill a pei-son passing under- neath on the street, it is murder, or manslaughter or homicide BV misadventure, according to whether there is an entire absence of care, or according to the degree of the precautions taken and of the necessity of such precautions. (1) A, having the right to the possession of a gun which was in the hands of B, and which he. A, knew to be loaded, attempted to take by force. In the struggle which ensued the gun accidentally went off and caused the death of B ; and A was held guilty of man- (1) 1 Hawk c. 31, 8. 68; 1 East. P. C. 231. HOMICIDE. — MANSLAUOHTKR. 569 slaughter, inasmuch as the discharge of the gun was the result of his unlawful act in attempting to retake the gan by force. (1) Contributory ITeH^llgcnce of Deceased no De- fence. — It is no defence to show that the death of the deceased was due in part to his own contributory negligence. (2) If the drivers of two carriages race with each other and urge their horses to so rapid a pace that they cannot control them, it is manslaughter in both drivers if, in consequence, one of the carri- ages ujisets and a passenger is killed. (3) Immoderate Correefion. — Where a parent is mode- rately correcting his child, a teacher his pupil, or a master his servant, and death happens to ensue, it is only misadventure ; but if the bounds of moderation be exceeded, either in the manner, the instrument, or the quantity of punishment, and death ensue, it is either manslaughter or murder, according to. the circumstances. (4) Thus, where a master corrected his servant by striking him with an iron bar, so that the suifei'er died, it was held to be murder. (5) And in all cases where the correction is inflicted with a deadly weapon and death ensues, it will be murder ; if with a weapon not likely to kill, though not proper for the purpose of correction, it will then be manslaughter. (6) Provocation. — Culpable homicide, which would otherwise be murder, may be reduced to manslaughter if the person who causes death does so in the heat of passion caused by sudden pro- vocation. 2. Any wrongful act or insult, of such a nature as to be sufficient to deprive an ordinary person of the power of self-control, may be provocation if the ottender acts upon it on the sudden, and before there has been time for his passion to cool. (1) R. V. Archer, 1 F. & F. 351. (2) R. V. Swindall, 2 C. & K. 230 ; R. v. Dant, L. & C. 567. (3) R. V. Timmins, 7 C. & P. 499. (4) 1 Hale, 473, 474. (5) R. V. Grey, Kel, 64. (6) Fost 262 ; R. v. Hopley, 2 F. & F. 201. See, also, R. v. Turner, Comb. 407 ; R. V. Conner, 7 C. & P. 438 ; R. v. Griffin, 11 Cox, 402. 670 PKAOTICAL QUIDS TO MAGISTRATES. 3. Whether or not any particular wrongful act or insult amounts to provocation, and whether or not the person pi-ovoked was actu- ally deprived of the power of self-control by the provocation which he received, shall be questions of fact. • No one shall be held to give provocation to another by doing that which he had a legal right to do, or by doing anything which the offender incited him to do in order to provide the offender with an excuse for killing or doing bodily harm to any person. 4. An arrest shall not necessarily reduce the offence from murder to manslaughter because the arrest was illegal, but if the illegality was known to the otfender it may be evidence of provocation. (Code, Art. 229.) Husband and Wipk. Compulsion of Wife.— (See p. 504, ante.) Duty of Husband to Provide STecesiiarleB. — (See Maintenance, post.) Kot AcceHSorles after the fact to each other's Offences. — (See Parties to Offences, p. 63, ante.) Ntealing by Husband or Wife.— (See Theft, post.) Ignorance. Ignorance of the I^aw.— The fact that an otfender is ignorant of the law is not an excuse for any offence committed by him. (Code, Art. 14.) The general principle that every person ia presumed to know the law (1) is 80 strong that it has been held to be no defence for a foreigner, charged with a crime committed in England, to show that the act was no offence in his own country, and that he did not know he was doing wrong in doing it in England. (2) An exception to the general rule is made in Article 12, which enacts that a person acting under a bad warrant shall, if he, in good faith and without culpable ignorance and negligence, believe (1) Broom'8 Leg. Max. 6 Ed. 247 ; R. v. Crawshaw, Bell, 303. (2) R. V. Esop, 7 C. & P. 456; Barronet's case, 1 E. & B. 1. IGNORANCE. 6tl it to be ^ood in law, be protected from criminal roHponnibility, and tliat ignorance of the law shall in such case be an excuse. (Code, Art. 21.) l|i|;iioraiic*<' of fact. — Tgnoranco or mistake in point of fact will, as a rule, bo a good and sufficient excuse. (I) For it raaf negative the existence of an evil intent; so that whenever any one, without fault or carelessness, is, while pursuing a lawful object, misled concerning facts, and acts upon them as he would be justified in doing were they what he believes them to be, he is legally as well as morally innocent. Thus, A in his own house strikes a blow under the mistaken though bono fid- belief that he is striking at a concealed burglar, but by this blow ho kills B, a member of his own family. A is guilty of no otlence. (2) But if the mistake bo made in the course of doing an unlawful act, and some unintended or unforeseen consequence ensue from an act wrongful and unlawful in itself, or if the mistake be due to negli- gence, the actor will be criminal!}^ responsible. For instance, A kills B, a friendly visitor, through negligently mistaking him for a burglar. Although A cannot bo convicted of murder he may be convicted of manslaughter by reason of his \va\''\\\^^ negligently failed to acquaint himself with the true state of affairs. (3) When a statute makes an act indictable, irrespective of guilty knowledge of some fact connected with it, ignorance of the fact will be no defence. (4) So that, where A. abducted B., a girl of 15 yeai's of age. from her father's house believing in good faith and on i-easonable grounds that H. was 18 years of age, he was held to have committed an offence, although if B had been 18 years of age, she would not have been within the statute. (5) It has been held that a person licensed to sell intoxicating liquors cannot be convicted of 'permitting drunkenness," unless he has knowledge of the drunkenness complained of. (0) (1) 4 Bl. Com. 27. (2) R. V. Levitt, Cro. Car. 558 ; 1 Hale. 474. (3) Hudson v. MacRae, 4 B. & S. 585. (4) Sedg. Stat. Law, 2iid Ed. 80 ; R. v. Jukes. 8 T. R. 536. (5) R. v. Prince, L. R. 2 C. C. R. 154. (6) Somerset v. Wade. 10 R. (Mcli. 1894) 2G3. 3T 572 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. : IMMIGRATION. The Govornor-Gonoral may, by proclamation, whonover lie dooms it nccoHHary. ]troliibit tho landing of paupor or destitute immigrants in all ports or any port in Canada, until such sums of money as are found necessary are provided and paid into the hands of one of tho Canadian immigration agents by the master of tho vessel carrying such im migrants for their temporary support and transport to the place of destination. (1) And the Governor-Gen- eral may by proclamation, when he deems it necessary i)r» 'tibit the landing in Canada of any criminal or other vicious class of inimi- gi-ants, except upon such conditions, for insuring their re-trans- portation to the port in Europe whence they came, as the Governor- in-Council prescribes. (2) Every passenger on board any vessel, arriving in the port or harbor to which the master, owner, or charterer of such vessel engaged to convey him shall be entitled to remain and keep his luggage on board such vessel during 48 houi's after her arrival in such port or harbor ; and every such master who compels any passenger to leave his vessel before the expiration of the said term of 48 horn's shall incur a penalty not exceeding $20 for every pass- enger he so compels to leave his vessel ; and the master of the vessel shall not before the expiration of the said 48 hours remove any berths or accommodation used by his passengers under a like penalty, except with the written permission of the medical super- intendent at the proper quarantine station. (3) As to seduction of female passengers by any master, officer or seaman on board a vessel while in Canadian waters, see Art. 184 of the Code, under the head of seduction, post. INCEST. Eveiy parent and child, every bi'other and sister, and every grand-parent and grand-child, who co-habit or have sexual inter- coui-se with each other, shall each of them, if aware of their CONSANGUINITY, be deemed to have committed incest, and be guilty (1) R. S. C, c. 65, see. 23. (2) lb. sec. 24. (3) lb. sec. 25. INDECENCY. 5*73 of an indictublo ott'oncb and liable to 14 yoars' impri.sonmonl,, and the male i>or8on shall also bo liable to bo whipped : Provided that, if the court or judge is of opinion that the female accused is a party to such intercourse only by reason of the restraint, fear or duress of the other i)arty the court or judge shall not be bound to impose any punishment on such person. (Code, Art. 176.) Indecenct. IiKleceiit Acts. — Every one is guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction before two justices of the peace, to a tine of fifty dollars or to six months' imprisonment with or without hard labour, or to both fine and imprisonment, who wil- fully— (a.) in the presence of one or more persons does any indecent act in any place to which the public have or are permitted to have access ; or « (ft.) does any indecent act in any place intending thereby to in- sult or offend any person. Sec. 6, of 53 Vic, c. 37 (which remains unrepealed), expressly mentions indecent exposure of the person as a punishable offence. It reads as follows : " Every one who wilfully commits any indecent exposure of the person or act of gross indecency in any public place, in the pres- ence of one or more persons, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and liable, on summary conviction before two justices of the peace, to a fine of fifty dollars or to six months' imprisonment with or without hard labour, or to both fine and imprisonment." It has been held in England that the offence of indecent expos- ure of the pereon may be indictable if committed before several persons, even if the place be not public, (1) and that men who bathe — without any screen or covering — so near to a public foot- path that exposure of their persons must necessarily occur, are guilty of an indictable nuisance. (2) (1) R V. Wellard, 14 Q. B. D. 63 ; 54 L. J, (M. C.) 14, (2) R. V. Reid, 12 Cox, 1 ; per Cockburn, C. J. 574 PHAOTICAL GUIDE TO MAOI8TRAT18. '' ,.. '■'''■ IJroNN Iild«»<*eil«'iy, — Every malo povHon is gu'''ty of an iii- (ii(?tal)lo ortbnce and liable to tivo yoarH' IniprisonnieMt and to be whipped who, in publie or private, eoinniitH, or is a party to the comniission of', or proeures or attoinptsto procure tlio eonuniHMion by any mnlo i)erson, of any act of grosK indecency with another malo porHon. (Code, Art. 178.) I»«l4'<*4'nt AmmiiiiIIn. — (See pp. 4(i2, 463, ante.) PoMtiiiK Iiiiinoral HooUn, Ktt*.— (See Art. 180 ,)f the Code.) PiibliNliiiiK oi* KxpoNiiiy; ObNoeii«' ^u<l«'r. — Every one is guilty of an indictablo otVenee and liable to ten years' imprisonment who knowingly, without lawful justification or excuse — \-'^'- •■' ?,.,■■■,■' ■■.'■. (rt.) publicly sells or exposes for public sale or to public view, any obscene book, or other printed or written matter, or any picture, photograph, model or other object lending to corru]>t morals ; or (6.) publicly exhibits any disgusting object or any indecent show ; or (c.) oilers to sell, advertises, publishes an advertisement of or has for sale or disposal any medicine, drug or article intended or represented as a means of jireventing conception or causing abortion. 2. No one shall be convicted of any offence in this section men- tioned, if he j)roves that the ])ublic good was served by the acts alleged to have been done. / 3. It shall be a question of hiw whether the occasion of the sale, ])ublishing, or exhibition is such as might be for the public good ; but it shall be a question for the jury whether there is or is not excess beyond what the i)ublic good requires. 4. The motives of the seller, publisher or exhibitor shall in all cases be irrelevant. (Code, Art. 179.) (See Vaohancy, poBt.) < ■ I indians. — /nsanity. 676 Indians. Till' provisions of tlio Indian Act, K H. C. c, 4.'}, liiivo boon modi- fied un(i umoiKh-d l>y tlu' T)! Vic, c. 22, tlio 53 Vic, c. 2l», tlio 5-1-55 Vic, c ;{(), and tlio 57-58 Vic, c-. ;{2. Iiicif«Miic>iit ut' liidiiiiiM to KiotoiiM Ai'tN.— (Soo p. 48(1, ante.) ■, - •' liKliaii 44ravt'N. — To sloiil ov uniiiwfully injuro or roinovo any image, bono, articlo or thing doposiled in or near any Indian gravo, is an otK'ni'o punishiii)l('. on summary conviction, by a penalty of SlOit oit tbroc months' im]>risonmcnt for a first otfcncc, and by the >;ime penalty ANn six months' im])ri8onment, with luird labour, for a subsequent otl'ence. (Code, Art. 352.) Insanity. IllNunlty. — No person shall be convicted of an otl'ence by reason of an act done or omitted by him when labouring under natural imbecility, or disease of the mind, to such an extent as to render him incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of the act or omission, and of knowing that sucli act or omission was wrong. 2. A person labouring under specific delusions, but in other res- pects sane, shall not be acquitted on the ground of insanity, under the provisions hereinafter contained, unless the delusions caused him to believe in the existence of some state of things which, if it existed, Avould justify or excuse ins act or omission. 3. Every one shall be presumed to be sane at the time of doing or omitting to do any act until the contrary is proved. (Code, Art. 11.) This Article corresponds with the decisions of English .ludges on the sul)ject. (1) Under the law as here expressed, a man may be insane, and still be convicted of an ottence ; in other words, not- Avithstanding his insanity he will be held responsible and pun- i.shable, unless his insanity was such that it rendered him inca- (1) R. V. Oxford, 9 C. & P. 525 ; R. v. Ofl'ord, 5 C. & P. 168; McNaghten'a Case, 10 CI. A F. 200 ; R. v. Townley, 3 F. & F. 839. 576 I'KACTICAL OlIIUK T<» MAHIHTIIATKH. 2)nbio of knowing thiit what ho diil whh wi'oti^ ; and, although a man may bo hiliourin^ uiidor simio doluHioii whoii ho oommilH an oH'onco, ho may still bo oonviotod of and puniNhod for that oH'onco, unloHH tho doluHJon wore Huoh that it mitdo him Ixdiovo that Home- thin/^ thon oxinti'd which if it had boon u roalily would havo juMti- tiod or oxcuhod what ho did, an, forinstanoo, a doiuHion that ho was being violontly atlaokod and in dangor of boinj^ murdorod. and that ho wnH obliged in sulf dofunco to kill hiH HiippoHod antagoniHt. ]lruilk4>ilii«'NM. — With rogard to dorangomont of tho mind by the UHO of intoxicating liquOPH, tho rulo iw that if drunkonnoHs bo contracted voluntarily it will not roliovo a porson from rosponHibi- lity for a crinunal otlonco committod by him while in a drunken condition, whothor at the tinjo he knowH what he \h doing or not. (1) Still, if the act bo one which muHt, In order to render it a cri- minal otfonco, bo done with Homo particular intent, the fact of itH being done when tho oft'ender is in a Htate of intoxication Hhould be taken into account in deciding whether ho ban Buch intent or not. (2) If tho drunkenness bo involuntar}', as if a person be made drunk by stratagem or fraud, or by some mistake, as by a physician un- skilfully administering some drug or intoxicant to a patient, or if a man become intoxicated in any other way than by his own vol- untary act, ho will not be responsible for an offence committed while so aflTocted to an extent which prevents him from knowing what ho is doing or from knowing that he is doing wrong. (3) Or, if, by habitual drinking, a person become afllected by a fixed frenzy, delirium tremens, or other form of in,sanity, whether ]iormanont or intermittent, ho cannot be held responsible for an act done by him while thus affected, if he be thereby rendered incapable of knowing that the act is wrong, or if he bo thereby subjected to some specific delusion causing him to boliove in the existence of some state of things which, if real, would justify or excuse his act. (4) IiiNiinity ot* iie<*iiN<Ml lit time ot* oflVii<*«>.— When- ever it is given in evidence upon the trial of any person charged (1)1 Hale, 32 ; 1 Hawk, P. C. c. 1, sec. 6. (2) R. V. Meakin, 7 C, & P. 297 ; R. v. Cruse, 8 C. & P. 541-546. (:5) 1 Rubs. Cr. 5 Ed. 114. (4) 1 Hale, 30 ; Burrow's Case, 1 Lewin, 26. INSANITY. R77 with Jiny in(li('tiil)l»H>ffon(io, tlmt Hueh porHon was inmiiR' ut thvtiino itf ilie coininiMHioii of huoIi ottbiico, and miicIi jtorson is a('([iiittcd, the jury HJiall lio rcqiiii-ud to tind, HiuH-iaiiy, whether Hueli jkm'hoii wan itiHane at the time of the coiniiiisHioii of istich otleiue, aixl to <h»chire whether lie is aequitted on aceount of such innanity ; and if it tinds that such person was insane at the time of commit- ting Hueh offence, the Court before which such trial is had, shall order such person to ho kept in strict custody in such place and in Huch manner as to the Court sooms flt, until the pleasure of the Lieutenanttiovernor is known. (Code, Art. 73(5.) On the trial of a deaf mute for felony, ho was found guilty, but the Jury also fouinl that he was incapable of underwtandin;^ and did not understand the proceedings at the trial ; upoji which Hnd- ing it was held that the prisoner could not be convicted, but must bo detained as a non sane person during the (Queen's pleasure. (I) IiiNaiiily of* a«*«*iiM<'d on arralKnH>«'i>t or trial. — If, at any time after the indictment is found, and before the ver- dict is given, it ajipears to the C'ourt that there is sufficient reason to doubt whether the accused is then, on ac 'ount of insanity, ca- pable of conducting his defence, the Court may direct that an issue shall be tried whether the accused is or is not then, on account of insanity, untit to take his trial. If the verdict on this issue is that the accused is not then unfit to take his trial, the arraignment or the trial shall proceed as if no such issue had been directed. If the verdict is that ho is untit, on a(!count of insanity, the Court shall order the accused to be kept in custody till the pleasure of the Lieutonant-Govornor of the pro- vince shall be known, and any plea pleaded shall be set aside and the Jury shall be discharged. But no such proceeding shall prevent the accused being after- wards tried on such indictment. (Code, Art. 737.) liiNanc perNoii <lifi<*harKcd for want of prose- <*lltion. — If any accused person, brought before any court to be discharged for want of prosecution, appears to bo insane, a jury shall be empanelled to try his sanity, and if they tind him insane (1) R. v. Berry, 45 L. J. M. C, 123. 578 PRACTICAL, GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. the court shall order him to be detained until the pleasure of the Lieutenant-Governor is known. (Code, Art. 731t.) Custody of* Iiisane PrrNOii. — In all cases of insan- ity so found", the Lieutenant-Governor may make an order for the safe custody of the person so found to be insane. (Code, Art. 740.) INSPECTION. Tliv Ijcneral Iiinipcctiou Act, (ii. S. C, c. 99), and its amendments, 50-51 Vie., c. 36, 52 Vic, c. l(i, 54-55 Vic, c, 48, and 57-58 Vic, c 36. provide for the inspection of the following staple articles of Canadian produce, namely : (a.) Flour and meal ; (fc.) Wheat and other grain, and hay ; (c.) Beef and pork ; (d.) Pot ashes and pearl ashes ; (e.) Pickled fish and tisli oil ; (/.) Butter ; and (g.) Leather and raw-hides. And a variety of pen- alties are imposed for violations of the Act. Section 6, provides that no inspector shall deal or trade in, or have any interest directly or indii-ectl}', in the production of any article subject to ins]jection by him, or sell, or — except for consump- tion by himself and his family — buy any such article. flPenalty, for violation of this provision, $200 and forfeiture of office. Section G (as amended by 57-58 Vic, c. 86, sec. 1), also provides that any deputy inspecjtor, except a deputy inspector of grain, may engage in the purchase and sale of articles insj)ecte(l by him ; but that, whenever he inspects any article in which he has a direct or an indirect interest, he shall brand it untler his name as branded thereon, with the woi'ds " deputy inspector and owner." And every dei'Uty inspector who violates any provision of the Act incurs a penalty not exceeding $100 and forfeiture of office, <^a« Iiispcctlon.— The Gas Tnspertion Act, (li. S. C. c. 101), provides for the appointment, by the Governor-General in Council, of inspectors of gas and gas meters in every i;\\y, town, village or place in Canada where gas is made for u.se, and for regu- lating the verification and stamping of gas meters, for testing the quality and purity of gas, and for punishing otfences against the Act. Amendments to the Act have been made by 53 Vic, c. 25. ELECTRIC LIGHT. 5T9 £lcotric liight. — The appointment of electric light in- spectors, the inspection, vcriticution and stumping of electric light meters, and the testing of electric wires, lines, tittings and apparatus are provided for by the Electric Liqht Inspection Act, (57-58 Vic, c 39.) Section 10 of the Act provides that any person, who maliciously or fraudulently abstracts, causes to be wasted or diverted, con- sumes or uses any electricity, shall be deemed guilty of theft and punishable accordingly. Prosecutions under the Act must be commenced within 3 months after the otl'ence is committed. (Section ;}4.) So soon as the standards and apparatus have been obtained and approved, the (Jovernor in Council nuij' issue a proclamation, fix- ing a day, not less than G months from the date of such proclama- tion, upon which the provisions of the Act respecting inspection shall go into operation, and nuiy, from time to time, determine at and for what places inspectors shall be appointed, and until such inspectors are ajipointcd the Act shall not be deemed to have come into operation with respect to such places. (Section IJ6.) liiM|»e«tioii of Petroleiiiii. — See the Petroleum In- spection Act, {II. S. C, c. 102), and its amendments, 54-55 Vic, c 49, 50 Vic, c. 3(;, and 5*7-58 Vic, c 40. Iiiiwpoctioii of Kliips. — See the Inspection of Ships Act, (54-55 Vic. c 37), amended by 57-58 Vic. c 45. Nteaiiibout liiNpt'otloii. — See the Steamboat Inspection Act, (R. S. ('., c 78), and its amendments. 52 Vic, c 23, 53 Vic, c. 17, 54-55 Vic. c 39, 55-56 Vic, c 19, 56 Vic, c 25, and 57-58 Vic, c 46. INTENT. It is well established, as a general principle, that the essence of a criminal oifence is the evil or wrongful intent with which the act is done. This is the doctrine embodied in the legal maxim, Actvs non farit reum nisi mens sit rea, " The act itself does not make a man guilty, unless his intention were so.' (1) (1) Broom's Leg. Max., 6 Ed. 300. 580 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. This principle, however, is not to be'taken as absolute and without limitation. F'or instance, the law may positively forbid a thing to be done, and declare, in absolute terms, that the doing of it shall be a criminal oft'ence, and in such a case it becomes there- upon, ipso facto, illegal to do it wilfully, or, in some cases even ignorantly. (1) In general, however, the intention of the party, at the time of committing an act charged as an offence, is as necessary to be proved as any other fact laid in the indictment, though it may happen that the proof of the intention consists in showing overt acts only, the reason in such cases being that every man is prima facie supposed to intend the necessary or even probable or natural consequences of his own acts. (2) See Capacity for Crime, p. 495, ante. See Ignorance, p. 570, ante. See Insanity, p. 5'75, anfe. intimidation. Intliiildatloii of* any pernoii. — Everyone is guilty of an indictable oti'ence, and liable, on indictment or on sum- mary conviction before two justices of the peace, to a line not exceeding $100 or to three months' imprisonment, with or without hard labor, who wrongfuUj' and without lawful authority, with a view to compel any other person to abstain from doing anything which he has a lawful right to do, or to do anything from which he has a lawful right to abstain, — (a) uses violence to such other person, or his wife or children, or injures his property ; or (6.) in- timidates such other person, or his wife or children, i)y threats of violence to him, her or any of them, or of injuring his projierty ; or (e.) persistently follows such other person about from place to place ; or (d.) hides any tools, clothes or other property owned or used by such other person, or deprives him of or hinders him in the use thereof ; or (e.) with one or more other persons follows such other person in a disorderlj'- manner, in or through any street (1) lb., 301 ; See R. v. Prince, L. R. 2 C. C R. 154, 175 ; cit. at p. 571, ante. (2) Broom's Leg. Max. 304 ; R. v. Moore, 3 B. & Ad. 188; R. v. Hicklin L. R. 3 Q. B. 375. INTIMIDATION. 681 or road ; or (/.) besets or watches the house or other place where such person resides or works, or carries on business, or happens to be. (Code, Art. 523.) A threat made to a woi-kman that his fellow-workmen will strike, unless he joins a union, or a threat made to a master that the union men in his'employ will strike if he continues to employ non-union men, was held not to be intimidation, because, as strikes are now lawful, the mere threat to strike, — which is a lawful act, cannot amount to intimidation. (1) Clause (/) of the above article expressly forbids picketing, as being an act of unlawful intimidation ; and a threat to picket has also been held to be intimidation. (2) The law allows simple watching or attending near a place to obtain or communicate information. (3) Intiinidation of norkmeii, etc— Every one is guilty of an indictable ott'ence and liable to two years' imprisonment who, in pursuance of any unlawful combination or conspiracy' to raise the rate of wages, or of any unlawful combination or conspiracy respecting any trade, business or manufacture, or respecting any . person concerned or employed therein, unlawfully assaults any person, or, in pursuance of any such combination or conspiracy, uses any violence or threat of violence to any person with a view to hinder him from working or being employed at such trade, business or manufacture. (Code, Art. 524.) Iiitliuiflation of produce dealerin, stevedores, ship carpenters, ship lahorers, etc., I»,y violence or tiireats. — This is an otfence punishable, on indictment or on summary conviction before two justices, b}' $100 tine, ortiiree months' imprisonment, with or without hard labor. Intiniidatiii)^ hiflders at sales of pnhlie lands. — This is indictable and punishable liy $400 tine or three months' imprisonment, or both. (Code, Art. 52C.) (1) Connor v. Kent, Gibson v. Lawson, Curran v. Treleaven, (1891), 2 Q- B., 5-16; 61 L. J. (M. C.) 9. (2) Judge V. Bennett, 52 J. P. 247. ( i) R. V. Bauld, 13 Cox 282. 582 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. See Conspiracy in Eestraint of Trade p. 505, ante, and Trade Combinations, p. 50(!, ante. Conspiracy to Intimidate a Legislature. Seo Art. 70 of the Code. intoxicating liquors.. liiqiior f^cllinv;. — Under the common law, and aside from statutory inhibitions and restrictions, .it is no otVonce to sell or to keep a place for selling intoxicatini; li(iiior without a license, l)rovide(l the i)lace be kept and conducted in an orderly and proper manner. (1) But the place may, by the manner of keeping and (conducting it, become a common law nuisance and a disorderly house, and the keeiDcr thereof may render himself liable to indict- ment (2) by, for instance, permitting dissolute persons to be tippling, carousing, swearnig, hallooing, and the like in and around his premises. (3) Jn such a case, moreover, ho will not be pro- tected from the chai'ge, even if he have a license for selling. (4) For, as has been said, by the court, in an American case, " The license to retail liquor is not, in the eye of the law, a license to keep a nuisance." (6) lfcM|»octi%'e Powers of* Doiiiiiiioii Purliaiiinit aiifl of ProviiK'ial Ije^riNlutiirc^iii. — The "regulation of trade and commerce " is one of the classes of subjects exjiressly placed under the control of the Dominion Parliament, by sect-ion 91 of the B. X. A. Act, which moreover, gives to the Dominion Parlia- ment a general authority to legishite for the peace, order and good government of Canada, and to make laws in relation to all matters not expressly assigned to the i)rovincial legislatures. Section !)2 of the B. N. A. Act gives to the provincial legislatures the right (among other local powers) to legislate as to shop, saloon and tavern licenses in oi'der to the raising of a revenue for ])rovincial purposes. And as an incident to this rjght, and in the exercise of the power (also conferred on them) to legislate as to property and civil rights (1) R. V. Joyce, 2 Show, 468. (2) Stephens v. Watsoi), 1 Salk. 45 ; Walker v. Brewster, L. R. 5 Eq. 22. (3) S V. Berthed, (J Blackf. 474. (4) U. S. v. Elder, 4 Cranch. C. C. 507. (5) S. V. M,ullikin, 8 Blaekf. 2(50. INT )XICATI?JO LIQUORS. 583 and mattci*H of a merely local or private nature, the provincial legirtlatures maj' make reasonable police or municipal regulations in connection with such licenses and may jiass legislation imposing fines and penalties including imprisonment with hard labour, for selling liquor without license. (1) But the closing paragraph of section 91 provides that, — notwith- standing anything in the Act contained, — any matters which come within the subjects placed, by section 91, within the jurisdiction of the Dominion Parliament, shall not be deemed to come within the classes of subjects assigned by section 92 to the provincial legis- latures. And it has been held that the Canada Temperance Act, — the object of which is to promote tcmjierance throughout the Dominion, by prohibiting the sale of anj' intoxicating liquor as a beverage, in any county or city wherein it is adopted, — is an Act which relates to the regulation of trade and commerce and to matters within the Dominion Parliament's general authority to legislate for the peace, order and good government of Canada, and that, although that Act is legislation which, in the counties and cities in which it is adopted, att'ects property and civil rights and interfei'es with shop, saloon and tavern licences and local and private matters, it is constitutional and within the legislative power of the Dominion Parliament ; (2) the principal ground of this and other decisions en the subject being that the Dominion Parliament is the dominant power, and that all bonafide legislation, which it pusses, upon matters comprised in the classes of subjects enumerated in section 91, is within its competency, no matter how much such legislation may art'ect, override or even exclude or sup- ersede the powers of the local legislatures with refeivncc to any of the subordinate classes of subjects enumerated in section 92; and that, in short, whenever the subject matter of any Dominion Act falls within any of the classes of subjects ])laced by section 91 under the control of the Dominion Parliament, it is immaterial to the constitutional legality of such Act 'that it also trenches upon or covers one or more of the classes assigned, by section 92, to the provincial legislatures, and that in such a case the subordinate power i»f the provincial legislatui-e must give way to the dominant (1) R. V. Hodge, 7 Ont. A. R. 246 ; Hodge v. R., L. R. 9 A pp. Cas. 117, (2) Russell v. R., L. R. 7 App. Cas. 829. ,684 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. power of the Federal parliament, as far as may be necessary to render the Dominion statute effective. In places, therefore, which have adopted the Canada Temperance Act, (the provisions of which are noticed further on, at p. 595, post,) that Act overrides provincial legislation on the subject of licences for the sale of intoxicating liquors. But, in places where the Act has not been adopted, the sale of intoxicating liquors as a beverage, and the granting of licenses for the sale thereof may be regulated by provincial statutes. It has been held that sec. 18 of 53 Vic. c. 56 (Ont), and sec. 1 of 54 Vic. c. 40 (Ont), allowing, under certain conditions, municipali- ties to pass by-laws for prohibiting the sale of spirituous liquors is intra oires the Ontario Legislature. (1) And in the province of Quebec it has been held that Article 5(jl of the Municipal Code as amended by 51-52 Vic, c. 29 ((^ue.) sec. 6., (E. S. Q., Art. 6118), by which a municipality is authorized to prohibit, — within a muni- cipality, — the sale of intoxicating liquors in quantities less than two gallons is within the powers of the provincial legislature. ("2) The sale of intoxicating liquors and the granting of licences for the sale thereof are governed, in the province of Quebec, by the II. S. Q., Articles 828 to 942, 52 Vic. c. 52, (Que.), 54 Vic. c. 13, (Que.), 55-56 Vic, c 11, and 56 Vic, c. 16 (Que.) ; in the province of Ontario by the E. S. O., c 194, as amended by 51 Vic. c. 30 (Ont.), 52 Vic, c 41, (Ont.), 53 Vic c. 56, (Ont.) 54 Vic c 46, (Ont.), 55 Vic. c 61, (Ont.), and 56 Vic. c 40 (Ont.) ; in the pro- vince of Nova Scotia, by 50 Vic. chaps. 38-43, (N. S.), 52 Vic. c 17 (N. S.), 53 Vic. c 18, (N. S.), 54 Vic chaps. 26-28 (N. S.), and 55 Vic. chaps. 23, 24 (N.. S.); in the province of New Brunswick by C. S. N. B., c 105 ; in the province of British Columbia by the Li- cense Acts, 51 Vic chaps. 73 & 76 (B. C), 52 Vic. c 10 (B. C), the Liquor Licnse Regulation Act, 1891, 54 Vic. c 21 (B. C), and the License Amendment Acts, 1894, 57 Vic c 28, & c. 29 ; in the pro- vince of Manitoba by the E. 8. (Man.), c 90, 55 Vic. c 24, and 56 Vic. c 18, (Man.) Intoxicating liquors are not allowed to be manufactured, com- (1) In re Local Option Act, Ont. A. R. 572 ; 11 C. L. T. 294. (2) CoriJorAtion of Huntingdon & Moir, 7 M. L. R. (Q. B.) 281. INTOXICATING LIQUOBS. ' 585 pounded or made in the North West Territories, nor in the district of Keewatin, except by special permission of the Governor in Council ; and no intoxicating litiuors are allowed to be imported or brought into the Territories or into Keewatin from any province of Canada nor to be sold, exchanged, traded or bartered, or had in possession, except by special permission of the Lieutenant-dover- nor, (E. S. C. ci 50, sec. 92 ; R. S. C. c. 53, sec. 35.) It has been held that under the Liquor Licensing laws of the province of Quebec, a municipal council has a discretion to refuse the renewal of a license, on the ground of there being no necessity for its existence, although the application for such renewal was supported by the signatures of the requisite number of the resi- dent electors of the parish and complied in other respects with all the technical requirements of the law. (1) It is enacted by the Imperial statute 33-34 Vic, c. 29, sec. 14, that every person convicted of felony shall forever be disqualified from selling spirits by retail ; and this section has been held in < England to apply to persons convicted before the Act was passed. (2) On an application for a shop license under .sub-section 14 of section 11 of the Ontario Liquor License Act, R, S. O., c. 194, as amended by 53 Vic. c. 56, (Ont.) sec. 1, it is imperative that the petition which is to be filed with the inspector before April Ist, be accompanied by a properly signed certificate of the majority of the electors, and the Act does not authorize the granting of such a license contrary to the provisions of that section, and it has been held that where the applicant for such a license omitted to file the certificate until some time after the first of April the granting of the license would on that account be contrary to the provisions of the section ; but that it would be otherwise as to a tavern li- cense, in which case a discretion rests with the commissioners. (3) A regulation by license commissioners requiring the lower half of bar-room windows to be left uncovered during prohibited houi-s (1) St Amour v. Corporation de St. EranQois de Sales, 7 M. L. R. (S. C.) 4:9. i2) Vine v. Leeds, 44 L. J. Ml C. 60. (3) In re Robert H. Hunter's License, 24 Ont. R. 721. 14 C. L. T. 126. *vw. , ^: I 586 PRAOTICAIi aUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. \s valid and reasonable, and a dot'ondant was lu'ld by iho Ontario Court of Appeal rightly eonvieted of iv breach of the regulation. (1) The principal ottences wliich, in places where the Canada 2'em- perance Ac* is not in force, can bo committed in connection with the liquor tratlic are: the sem-ING of intoxicating liquor without a LICENSE ; and the .selling of intoxicating liiiuor by a licensee DURiN(j I'HOiiiHiTED HOURS or iu ANY PLACE in \Vhich he is N(»T authorized by his license to sell it. NelliiiK wItliOHt lit'oiiHC. — Upon a charge of selling in- toxicating li([uor without a license, there must be evidence to show that the liquor sold was intoxicating liquor. (2) It is a question of fact whether the liquor sold is intoxicating ; and a mild beverage which would not cause ])erceptible intoxica- tion to some persons, may be held to be intoxicating if it exhili- rates the parties who drink it, though it might not be sufficiently strong to atlect habitual users. (H) A conviction, ujxrn a charge of selling without license, should contain an allegation that the sale M'as without license. (4) A conviction for that one II did sell wine, beer and other spritu- ous or fermented liquors, to wit. one glass of whiskey, contrary TO LAW, was held bad. for uncertainty, in not showing Avhether the of^'cnce was selling without a license, or selling by a licensee during illegal hours. (.")) A defendant purchased for $2;') from a duly liceased hotelkeeiier the day's receijtts of the bar ; and at the close of the day such recei])ts were ])aid over to him. Held, that a conviction against the defendant for selling li(|Uor without a license, contrary to the Ontario Liquor License Act, could not be supported, and it was accordingly- quashed, ((i) The Licen.se Act in New Brunswick provides that in cities all applications for licenses shall be considered by the nuiyor at a (1) R. v. Martin. 21 Out. A. R. 145. (2) E. V. Grannis, 5 Man. L, R. 153 ; R. v. Bennett, 1 Ont. R. 445. (3) R. V. McDonald, 24 N. S. R. 35. (4) £^ar/)ortt' Woodlionse. 3 L. C. R. 94. (5) R. V. HogKard, 30 U. C. Q. B. 152. (G) R. V. Westlake, 12 C. L. T. 97. . INTOXICATING LIQUORS. ' / \'^y'''' f^' meeting to be held not later than tlie first of April in each year. It was held that the fact of the meeting to consider the applications for licenses not being hold till after the first of April was no defence to a charge of selling liquor without a license. (I) It has been held in Ontario that the quashing of a by-law under which a certificate has been granted and a license issued to sell spirituous liquors does not nullify the license, and that u convic- tion, under these circumstances, for selling liquor without license could not be supported. (2) A conviction for selling liquor without a license is had, if it do not specify the day on which the offence was committed. (3) Under section IVI of the Ontario Liquor License Act, \X. 8. 0., o. 104 (amended by 53 Vic. c. 5(5, (Ont,), sec. 113) the occupant of the house in which an offence is committed is personally liable to the penalty. Thus, where a married woman was the lessee of the premises and the husband in her absence sold liquor without a li- cense, she was held liable to conviction. (4) A defendant, — who had been a licensed hotel keeper, having a bar furnished with a counter and the usual appliances for the sale of liquor, but whose license had exi)ired, — was asked by a couple of persons for whiskey. Ho told them ho could not sell it, and gave them temperance drinks, and, on being paid therefor, he treated them to whiskey, which he obtained from a bottle behind the counter. Ho was convicted under sec. 50 of the Liquor Licetise Act, II, S. O. c. l!)4 for permitting spirituous liquors to be drunk in his house, being a house of public entertainment ; and the con- viction was maintained. (5) It has been held in Ontario that a wife who sells liquor at the husband's place of business, in bis absence, is his agent, so that the husband may be convicted for the act of the wife. (6) It has however been held that if the act of sale by a person other (1) Ex parte Drisc-oU, 27 S. C. N. 13. 216. (2) R. V. Stafford, 22 U- U C. P. 177. (3) R. V. French, 2 Kerr, 121. (4) R. V. Campbell, 8 U. C. P. R. 55. (5) R. v. Richardson, 11 C. L. T., 154. («) R. V. McCauley, 14 Ont. R. 643. 38 688 PRACTICAL ODIDK TO MAOIRTRATRS. than tlio occupant wore an isolatod act, wholly nnauthorizud by tho occupant and not in any way in tho coutho of his busincsH, but a thing done l»y tho unwarranted or wilful act of tho Hubordinato, tho occupant might oscapo personal rosponHil)ility. (1) It has been held, in England, that a sale in a club to a member thereof was not a sale, within the meaning of the Liquor License Acts even when tho liquor was fov cumsumption otl' tho club proniisos. (2) And tho members of a club committee wore held not liable for tho wrongful sale by tho club's steward, contrary to their order and without their knowledge. (3) But where li(iuor was 8Ui)plied — by a limited company carrying on a proprietory club, — to and ]>aid for by a person who had been named an '' honorary' member," ponding cncjuiries and pending his election as an active member and had paid his subsci-ijition, but not being elected as an active member, his subscription was subse- quently returned to him, it was held that there was a sale to him by tho company of tho liquor by retail for which the company were liable in penalties. (4) It has been held that whore, in a club incorporated under the Benevolent Societies Act (R. S. O. c. 172) liquor was sold or supplied to members, but such sale or supjilj' was not the main or special object of the club, there was no violation of tho License Act ; but that it was otherwise whore th« sale or sujjply of liquor was the main object of the incorporation, and that tho question was one for tho decision of the magistrate upon the evidence, and that there being some evidence to support the magistrate's finding that liquor selling wus tlie main (diject of the club with intent to evade the Liquor License Act, tho Court would not interfere with the magis- trate's tinding. (5) Uj^on a motion to quasli a conviction for selling liquor without a license, it ap])eared that at a dinner given at the Ottawa Club, a purely social club, one of the guests, who was not a member of the clul), ordered some wine, in payment of which he gave to the U) R. V. King, 20 U. C. C P. 246. (2) GrafF V. Evans, 8 Q. B. D, 373 ; 51 L. .T. M. C. 25. See cases cited at pp. 441 & 571, anil'. (3) Newman V. Jones, 56 L. J. M. C. 113. - (4) Bowyer v. Percy Supper Club, 5 R. (1893) 472. < (5) R. V. Austin, 17 Ont. R. 743. INTOXICATINO t,lQU<iU8. 58!» waiter liis c'ho(|ui', which wntt dolivorod Ity tho wnitor to the MtDWurd, who, on tlu' following morning, handed it to the defen- dant, the secretary of tho cluh, wiiich wan the Hrst ho icnew of the Nalo, and, ho far an appeared, he wan not aware that the guest was not a memlior. Held, tiiat the wale was complete when tho cheque was accepted by the waiter, hut, an there was no evidence lo show that the defendant was, in any way, aware that the wine was to bo sold to anyone not a member of the club, and as the club was tho proprietor antl owner of the wines and tho steward its agent, and in no sense tho agent of tho defendant, tho latter could not be convicted for the act of any other servant of tho club to which he was neither party nor privy ; und the conviction was accordingly quashed. (1) Where a particular act constitutes tho oft'onco, it is enough to describe tho act in the words of tho statute ; and so a conviction under the 32 Vic. (Out.) c. ;{2, alleging that the defoiuiant sold spirituous liquors by retail without license at such a time and at such a ph'co was hold sufficient without specifying the kind and quantity of liquor sold. (2) Though tho general rule of law is that the burden of proof lies on, tho party substantially asserting the affirmative, there is an e.Kception in the case of a prosecution for selling liquor without a license; and tho burden of proving tho existence of a license, where such is required to legalize tho act, is upon tho defendant. It is for him to show liis license, and not for tho prosecutor to make proof negativing its existence. (3) Melliii|( <liirinK prohibited lioiirN.— It \» only the holder of a license who can bo prosecuted for soiling on prohibited days or in prohibited hours. (4) When a defendant is charged with soiling liquor during pro- hibited hours, there must be proof of tho license in order to justify a conviction. (5) ; ^ v \; (1) R. V. Hodgins, 24 Ont. R. 433(a). • : . , ■. (2) R. V. Kiag, 20 U. C. C. P. 240 ; Re Donnelly, 20 U. C. C. P. 165. (3) Re Barrett, 28 U. C. Q. B. 559 ; Ex parte Parke, 3 Allen, 237 : R. v McNiool, ] 1 Ont R. 659. (4) R, v. Duquette, 9 U. C P. R. 28 ; R. v. French, 34 U. C Q. B. 403. (5) R. v. Williams, 8 Man. L. R. 342. 12 C. L. T. 282, Bl)0 PRACTICAL (li;iI)E TO MACUSTKATEH. Sections 54 and ftH of tlui Ontiirio Liquor f.irtme Act do not Htithorizu tho huIo of intoxicating li(|iior to a lodger during ]iro- hihitud houpN. The nioNt that can bu Haid in that a Hale to a lodger does not mal^c liim an oti'endor. (1) The Imperial Htatuto, HT-iW Vifc., c. 4!>, Hec. 30, providen that \w liccnHcd person is liable to any |ienalty for supplying during pro- hibited hours his private friends, bona fide entertained by biin, at his own expense. Hut, when, on the break-up of a customer's HUp})er party the landlord invited nine of his customer's guests to wine, after hours, it was lield that he was riglitly convicted of KEliMNU oi'EN, as he could not convert those people into jtrivate friends. (2) It has been held .that a constable who, by ortler, visits saloons on Sundays to see whether or not the law with respect to the sale of liquor is being obeyed is a bona fide traveller within the meaning of the Act. (3) The Licensing Acts generally contain some provisicui to enable a licensee to serve drink to a bona fide traveller, on i)rohibitcd days- or in prohibited hours. The test whether a man is a bona fide traveller, who may bo served with drink during prohibited hours, is the object of his journey. A bona fide traveller under tlio Knglish License Acta, is one who travels three miles for business or for pleasure, and does not include one who travels that distance solely with the object of obtaining drink ; and the licensee who serves such a man, if, as in the case in point, he knows the man's object, may be convicted of the ott'ence of selling during prohibited hours. (4) A man left his home on a Sunday morning and walked three (|uarters of a mile to a railway station and thence took the train to another station about 2A miles off, where ho was employed us a porter. He afterwards left the station and walked to certain li- (1) R. v. Southwick, 12 C. L. T. 173. (2) Corbet v. Haijrh. 5 C. P. D. 50. (8) R. V. Harris, 2 Brit. Col. L. R. 177. (4) Pena v. Alexander, 5 R. (1893), 251. I Mon. Law Dig. 578. '* [NTOXIUATINQ MQliOUH. 691 <!enHe(l pruiniNOH vvlioro \w wuh Horvod with hoor. Tho lituiiHi'd piv- iniNOK worn K'mh timn a tnilo from tho Htutioii whoro h« wuh cm- ployod, but more thiin throo miloH from \m rimidi'iu'o. Held that he was a bona fide travollor within tho Kii/^liHh Licensing Act. (1) NellliiK oft tht-^ |jl4'<<«iiN<'(l l*reiuiNeN. — A licoiinu to hoI! intoxicating li([Uor oidy oxtendH to |)ormit ti 8jilo on tho promiHos licoMHod. and not to otht^r promiHos forming no part of tho lioonsod promiMOri, liiough Hiioh othor promiwos holong to tho sanio porson. Tho flofondant, in an Ontario oaso, wan liconHod to ho!1 in and upon promirtOH known aH tlio '■ Palmor Houho," which HtocMJ upon tho front of a doop lot owned by tho dofon(hint, the rear part of sudi lot huviiif^ boon ft)r man}' years oncioMod and UHod as a fair j^round. Facing this ground and opening therein was a l)Ootii, tho iuuU of whicii formed part of u fence which separated tiio fair ground from tlio yard in tho roar of the defendant's hotel. The distance between tho nearest out-building of tlm hotel *ind the l»ooth was 50 yards, and it did not ajjpoar that tho booth was used at all in connection with the hotel. A conviction for soiling liquor without a license in tho booth was held proj)er, inasmuch as it was no part of tho liconsod promises. (2) A company was incorporated under tho Joint Stock Letters Patent Act, H.S.O., c. 157, for establishing a driving park t« imi>rovo the brood of horses, etc., and, for such purposes, to acquire the Duttbrin Park property, on Duttbrin Street, Toronto, with power to erect a <jlub house, and, subject to tho Jjiquor License Act, to maintain and rent or It aso tho same, for social purposes, etc. ; and generally to do all things incidental or conducive to tho objects aforesaid. Held, that the charter did not authorize the company to have a club house at any othor place than that spocitied in tho charter ; and whoro, therefore, tho defendant was found in possession of and soiling liquor at a place called the Occident JIall, on (iueon Street, though claimed to be a club constituted under the charter, and ■of which the uefendant claimed to be the secretary, he was pro- perly convicted under section 50 of the Liquor License Act (1) Cowftp V. Atherton, 5 R. (1893), 86. (2) R. V. Palmer, 4 U. C. Q. B. 262. 5\)2 I'llACTlOAL «H11I)E T<i MAUIHTIIATKH. J{. S. ()., ('.. 1M4, (Out.), ol" uiilawi'ully ku('|»iiifi; li(|u»)r l()i*Halo,',l»artor or (raHic, without a licouHt!. (1) Tlio liii|Ktrial Act, .'{5 ;{(J Vic, c. !>4, irml<i!H it an oll'oiico for any poimn to Holl or oxpONo for Halo by rotuil any intoxicating liquor witliout l)cin/j; <iuly liccnwMl to hoII t lie Hanic, or to soil or cxpoHO for Hale any intoxicating li(|U()r at any I'i.ack wiikiik he is not AUTiioiu/Ei> iiv illH i.i(<ENHE To HEM, THE SAME ; and it has bcon held that, a porson holding, under that Act, a rotail liccnso in one town is not cntith»d (without another license) to have in another town an oflice wiiere his agent takes orders only, aiul wiiich orders are exoiuited at tlio head estalilishnH^tit. The facts were tlmse : S. had in Worcester an estal)lishin<Mit duly Iic,«(nsed, and in Cheltenhani he ha<l an ollice when' no licpiors wen! kt(|)t. An order was given in (!heltenharn hy A., to whom the goods wi^re afterwards sent direct from tlie estahlishinent in Worcester; and it was held that the agent, in ( 'heltenhani, who received the order tlu^n^, from A., was rightly convi<'ted of stalling without a license. (2) And send- ing liijuor to a |)lac«) where it was rallied for, the licensee taking the money, was held to support a conviction for selling at an un- licensed place. (3) It is an oti'ence under tlie TAquor License Act, It. S. .(), c. 1!t4, (Ont.), and anu'ndmonts, thereto, for a chemist or druggist to allow intoxicating liquor, sold l»y him or in his possession, to ho consumed in his shoj) hy the purchaser thereof; and it is not essen- tial that 1h! should he registered ; and a conviction therefor wfts sustained. (4) A conviction for an otfcnce against the TAquor License Acts must show jurisdiction in the nuigistrate, hy stating the place where the oti'ence was committed ; and a clause providing that a »!onviction shall not Wi void for defects in form or substance does not cure an objection of this kind, but only applies when it can be understood from tl>e conviction that it was made lor an oU'encc within the jurisdiction of tin; convicting magistrate, (5) (1) K. V. Charles, 14 C. L. T., 40. (2) Hhellard v. Marks, W Q. B. I). 412 : 47 L. J. M. C. 91. (I!) S«aKer v. Wliite, U\ L. T. (N.H.) 2(il. (•») U. V. MoCay, 13 (.'. L. T. 2();i ; 23 Ont. R. 442. (5) K. V. Yonnj:, n Ont. B. 1H4. INTOXICATING MyilORS. 593 Where llie jiinH(li('ti()ii of tlio JtiHtieo appuai-od on {\\v conviiaioii, the oHdiH-e Ix'iiig iillc^od (o huv(* Ikhui coimnittiMl at tlio town of Moncton, wlicro it waH tricMl, and tin* conviction hcin^ in tlic loriii ]>n!Hchb«Ml hy tlio II. S. (N. M.) c. 13H, and the phicc olnahi Hpokon of at the trial u|»|)earin^ to i)o known to ail parlicH, and there hav- ing Imen no (»hJ(M'tion then nuido that it wawnot within 1 lie justice's juriHdictioii, it was hehl that tlie Jurimlit^tion sutliciontiy appc^ared, though tliere did not appear to i)e poHitiv(ievi(h»nce thai thts oll'enco waH eoniniitted within the liniitH oC the town of Moncton. (I) A (Ud'onchmt was Huinniarily eonvic^tod in N«'w iirunswick of a viohiti(»n oft lie Canada Temperance Act. TliesutnnioiiH was served on tiie defendant's wife at the (Uifendiinl'K hist phice of aho(U«, as directed l)y Article 5(12 of the (!ode (p. 108, ante^. I'pon a rule for a certiorari, — granted on an alHdavit of tJie defendant that from a (hite previouH to the information until aftt^rthc hearing \w had been (!ontiniiously o\it of the iirovim-c, in the State of .Maine, — it was held that the convicting juslict* could not ac([uire any jurisdiction over the person of the dtd'endant while he was out of the j»rovince and that therefore the service was void and tlie conviction must he re- moved. (2) In .Nova Scotia, it has lieeii held that, — vvheni a summons for selling li(|uor contrary tt> law was issued by two justices of the peace, and t lu! case t ried before onti of tluiui aixl another justice who had not signed the summons, — the conviction must be set aside!. (.'{) VVMiere a convicti(»n, — for unlawfully selling licjuor in violation of the provisions of the* .Nova Scotia Liquor License Act, 1S8(!, and amending ,\cts, — omitted to show that the otVenci! was ct)mmilcd within !H» days from the date of the laying of thi* information, it was held that tlu( conviction was bad. (4) Where a defcMidanI was <onvicted for that \w did sc^ll liquor " within !I0 days l»efore the 2Hth August, the date of the informa- tion herein, to wit, between the 2i)th day of May, 18!K), and the (1) Kjpnrk Diinlop, 3 Allen, 281. (2) Exjuirle l-leminj;, 14 C. L. T. 1()0. (3) WeekH v. Honliani, 2 Uuss. i»t Ches. .177. (4) R. V. Adams, 13 C. L. T. 40(5. 594 PRACTICAL QUIDK TO MAQISTRATBS. 28th day of August, 1890, a motion was made to sot aside the con- viction, on the ground that the time of the commission of the offence was not stated in the conviction. Held, that this ground did not cover the objection that ujion the face of the conviction the offence might have been committed on a date burred by the limit of the statute (1) The defendant was detained in gaol under a warrant issued on a conviction of a third offence against the Ontaiio Liquor License Act, the warrant reciting the conviction in question and the first conviction, and also the fact that subsequent to the first convic- tion, on a day mentioned, the defendant was " again " convicted. Held, that the warrant, which directed the levying of a fine and the imprisunment of the defendant, and ordered among the costs to be paid by him, costs of conveying to gaol, was good, and that the word " again " was a sufficient statement that the conviction recited was a second conviction. (2) In oi'der to maintain a conviction for a third offence under sec. 94 of the (Quebec License Law, as amended by 50 Vic, c. 3, sec. 11 (now Article 926 It. S. (J,), the previous convictions need not have been under the same license m)r during the same license year, but may have been under a license of a previous license jear. (3) A defendant was indicted and convicted, under Article 154 of the Criminal Code, of an attempt by corrupt moans to dissuade a witness from testifying upon certain prosecutions against the defendant and another, for offences against the Ontario Liquor Li- cense Act, R. S. O. c. 194. On a case reserved the defendant's counsel contended that the defendant should not have been prosecuted under Article 154 of the Code (which makes a corrupt interference or attempt to interfere with a witness indictable and punishable by TWO years' imprisonment), but that the prosecution should have been under the provincial Act containing a i)rovi8ion against tampering with witnesses, inasmuch as the provision in question in the provincial Act was recognized in the Code, by Article 138, which makes it an indictable offence (punishable by one years' imprison- ment) to disobey any act of the Parliament of Canada or of any (1) R V. Murphy, 13 C. L. T. 242 ; 24 N. S. R. 21. (2) R. V. McLean, 14 C, L, T. 312. (3) Desnoyers v. Bazin, 43 L. C. .1. 225 ; See R. v. Black, 4 U. C. Q. B. 180. '\ / INTOXICATING LIQUORS. — SCOTT ACT. 595 LEGISLATURE of Canada. Held (following R. v. Lawrence, 43 U. C. Q. B. 164), that the provision in question in the Ontario License Act is still Ultra vires the provincial legislature, and that Article 138 of the Code was passed merely to cover any case not other- wise provided for in the Code ; and the conviction of the defendant under Article 154 of the Code was accordingly maintained. (1) The Ontario Liquor License Act, as amended by 52 Vic. c IT, (Ont.) sec. 2, empowers any policeman, etc., to enter at any time any place where liquors are reputed to bb sold, or where he believes that liquors are kept for sale or disposal contrary to the |)rovi8ions of the Act, and to make searches in every part thereof, as he may think necessary. But it has been held that these words attbrd no jjrotcction to a policeman who invades a private house at an unreasonable hour, and without a well founded and honest belief that the law has been violated. (2) Where, in Ontario, the defendants were committed for trial on a chai'ge of obstructing a peace officer acting under a search warrant issued on an information charging reasonable ground for the belief that 8i3irituous liquors were unlawfully kept for sale in an un- licensed house, it was held that the search warrant must be deemed to have been issued under section 131 of the Ontario Liquor License Act, R. S. O. 194 (amended by 55 Vic. [Ont.] c. 12), giving power to force an entrance into the premises, but containing no power to punish an obstruction, and that consequentlj' the proceedings against the defendants for obstructing the officer must be under Article 263 of the Code. (3) The Canada Temperance Act. — Under the Canada Temperance Act (R. S. C, c. 106) and its amendments (51 Vic, c. 34 and c. 35) one-fourth of the qualified Dominion electors of a county, or of a city, may petition the Governor-treneral for an order-in-council to prohibit the sale cf any intoxicating liquor in such county or city. The petition is embodied in a notice addressed and sent to the Secretary of State, after ten days' deposit thereof, for public examination, in the office of the sheriff or registrar of (1) R. V. Holland, 14 C. L. T. 294. (2) White V. Beckham, 14 C. L. T. 475. (3) R. V. Hodge, 13 C. L. T. 204. 596 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. deeds, pursuant to a two weeks' notice in two local newspapers. The Governor-in-Council may then, by proclamation published three times in the Canada Gazette, and tiikeb times in the Official Gazette of the province whore the county or city is situated, direct a poll to be held for taking the votes of the electors for and against the adojition of the petition. In the case of a city which is within the territorial limits of a county, the Act may be brought into force, as to such city, upon petition and vote of the electors of such city alone. (1) If, by the electors of the county or city to which it relates, the petition be adopted, the Governor-in-Council may, at any time after the expiration of sixty days from the day of its adoption, declare, by order-in-council published in the Canada Gazette, that the second part of the Act shall be in force and take effect in such county or city fi:om and after the expiration of certain specified delays, which vary according to whether there are or are not any liquor licenses then in force in such county or city, and according to the time of the expiration of such licenses, if any. (li. S. C, c. 10(5, sec. 95.) A poll had been held in the county of Kings, N.S., and the Governor-in-Council declared by JprocUimation that the second l^art of the Act should be in force and take effect " upon, from and after the day on which the .;nnual or semi-annual licenses now in force in said county will expire."' There were then no licenses in the county, and there had been none for years previously. Meld, that no day had been fixed, either by the statute or by proclama- tion, for bringing the second jiart of the Act into force.( 2) No order in council issued under the Act can be revoked until after the expiration of three years from the date of the coming into force, under it, of the second part of the Act ; and no petition for any such revocation can be submitted to the vote of the elec- tors more than thirty days before the expiration of the three years. (3) ' When a petition for revocation is adopted by the electors of the (1 ) Ex parte Dalton, 27 S. C. N. B. 426. (2) R. V. Lyons, 5 Russ. & Geld. 201. (3) R. g. C c. 106, sec. 96, as amended by 51 Vic, c. 35, sec. 3. INTOXICATING lilQIJORS. — SCOTT ACT. 597 county or city to which it relates, the Governor in Council may, at the expiration of thirty days from its adoption, declare, by order-in-council, published in the Canada Gazette, that the second part of the Act shall be no longer in force. (1) While the Act continues in force in any county or city, no PERSON, by himself, his clerk, servant or agent, shall, therein, KXPOSE OR KEEP FOR SALE, or directly or indirectly, on any pre- tence or upon any device, sell or barter, or, in consideration of the purchase of any other property, give, to any other person, any intoxicating liquor. (2) And every one so exposing or keep- ing FOR SALE, or so SELLING Or BARTERING or GIVING any intoxi- cating liquor, is liable, on summary conviction, to a penalty of not LESS than S50 for the first offence, (3) of not less than $100 for the second offence, and to imprisonment not exceeding two MONTHS for the third and every subsequent offence. (4) And all intoxicating liquoi-s in respect to which any such offence has been committed, and all kegs, barrels, bottles, etc., are subject to for- feiture. (5) Provision, however, is made for the sale — by druggists and VENDORS THERETO SPECIALLY LICENSED — of WINE for exclusively sacramental purposes; (6) and for the purchase and sale by LEGALLY QUALIFIED PHYSICIANS, CHEMISTS OR DRUGGISTS (under certain special restrictions) of the following articles : (a.) the OFFICIAL PREPARATIONS of the authori/.ed pharmacopanas, when made of full medicinal strength, and sold only for medicinal T'jRPOSES ; (6) any patent medicine, unless known to the vendor to be capable of use as a beverage, the sale of which is a violation of the Act ; (c.) eau de cologne, bay rum or other perfumery, (1) 51 Vic. c. 35, sec. 9. (2) R. 8. C, c. 100. sec. 99. (3) The words "not less than $oO" mean just $50; and a conviction im- posing $75 was quashed as being beyond the magistrate's jurisdiction. — R. V. Smith, 16 Ont. R. 454. (4) It has been held that as the Act does not make it an offence to buy liquor, a purchaser cannot be found guilty of an offence in respect of a sale of liquor made to ium. — R. v. Heath, 13 Ont. R. 471. See also Ex parte, Bar- ker, 11 C. L. T., 136. (o) R. S, C, 0. 106, sec. 100. (6) lb., a. 99, sub-sec. 3. .( -, ''• V 698 ; ! PRACTICAL guide to magistrates. ' LOTIONS, extracts, VARNISHES, TINCTURES, or Other pharmaceu- tical preparations containing alcohol, and not intended for use as beverages; (f/.) methylated spirits for pharmaceutical, chemical or mechanical uses; and (e.) spirituous liquors or alcohoi. for PURELY medicinal PURPOSES, Or for bona fide use in some art, trade or manufacture. (1) And there are special provisions en- abling producei"8 of cider, distillers, brewers, vine-growing com- panies, manufacturers of pure native wines, and licensed wholo- sale dealers to make certain sales of their liquors. (2) Prosecutions under the Act are summary and must be com- menced within three months after the alleged ott'enco. (3) ' Prosecutions may be brought before any Judge of the Sessions of the Peace, recorder, police magistrate, stipendiary magistrate, sitting magistrate, commi.ssionor of a parish court, two justices of the peace or any magisti'ate having the power or authority of two or more justices of the peace having jurisdiction where the otfence was committed. (4) As to warrants to search for and power to seize and forfeit and destroy intoxicating liquors and the keg.s, etc., containing them, see sections 108 and 109 of the Act, as amended by 51 Vic, c. 34, sees. 10 and 11. Section 115 of the Act shows the procedure upon an infoi-mation for committing any offence against the Act, in case of a previous conviction or convictions being charged There is no power to punish as for a third offence unless there have been two prior convictions for offences of the same nature, and where neither the record of conviction nor the evidence shows this, the conviction must be quashed. (5) Section 110 of the Act makes it sufficient to state the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor without stating the name or kind of such liquor. So, that, where a conviction under the Act stated that the defendant had sold "spirituous or other intoxicating li- (1) 51 Vic, r. 34, sec. 5; 61 Vic, c 35, sec. 11 ; 55-56 Vic, c 26. (2) R. S. C, c 106, sec. 99, eub-secs. 5-8. (3) Ik, sees. 106, 107 (as amended by 51 Vic, c 34, sec- 9), (4) lb; sec. 103 (cm amended by 51 Vic. c. 34, sec. 6.' (5) R. V. Clark, 15 Ont. R. 49. INTOXICATING LIQUORS. — SCOTT ACT. 59» quors " apd the proof was a sale of brandy, the conviction was. amended, under section 118 of the Act, by striking out the word» " spirituous or other." (1) Pro4»t*. — When a bar, counter, beer pumps, kegs or other ap- pliances, similar to those used in liquor taverns and shops are found in any premises in any municipality where the Act is in force, any intoxicating liquor that may be also found there shall be deemed to be kept for sale in contravention of the Act unless the defenruint proves the contrary ; and the occupant of such ])re- mises shall be taken conclusively to be the pei-son who keeps therein such liquor for sale. (E. 8. (-., c. 106, sec. 111.) Before a person can bo legally convicted, under the Act, of selling liquor, it must be proved, before the magistrate, that the second part of the Act is in force, by the production of the Canada Gazette containing the proclamation. (2) The fact of the Act having come into force must be jiroved as any other fact necessary to give jurisdiction. ('•?) See sees. 8 & 9 of the Can. Ev. Act, 1893, as to proof of proclamations. It is provided by section 120 of the Canada Temperance Act that every one who, having violated any of the provisions of the Act or of any act in force in any province respecting the issue of licenses for the sale of fermented or spirituous liquors, compromises, compounds or settles, or offers or attemj)s to compromise, compound or settle the oifence with any person or persons, with the view of prevent- ing any complaint being made in respect thereof, or, if a complaint has been made, with the view of getting rid of such complaint, or of stopping or having the same dismissed for want of prosecution or otherwise, is gnilty of an offence against the Act, "ud liable, on conviction thereof, to imprisonment at hard labor for m\y term not exceeding three months ; and that every one who is concerned in or is a party to the compromise, composition or settlement men- tioned in this section, is guilty of an offence, and liable, on convic- tion thereof to imprisonment for any term not exceeding three- months. , r (1) R. V. Blair, 24 P. C. N. B. 71. (2) R. V. Histeen, 22 S. C. (N.B.) 51. (3) R. V. Bennott, I Ont. R. 445 ; R. v. Welsh, 2 Ont. R. 200. fiOO PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. Section 121 ])rovi(lcH that ovorj' ono who, on any pvoHccution under any of the said Acts, tampers with a witness, eitlicr before i)r after he is suinmoned or a])pear8 as such witness on any trial or proceeding under any such Act, or by the otter of money, or by threats, or in any other way, either directly or indirectly, induces or attempts to induce any such witness to absent himself, or to swear falsely, shall incur a penalty of tifty dollars for each offence. In a proceeding under this .section for tampering with a witness it is sufficient to i)rove that an information has been laid and a summons issued for a violation of the Act, and that the party tampered with was summoned to be a witness on the hearing of the (charge ; and whore a conviction under this .section, for tampering with a witness, charged the defendant with offering the witness money to induce him to lea.o the country and also with attempt- ing by threats to induce him to absent himself, it was held that though this was a charge of two offences, it was cured by Article 9U7 of the Code. (1) Certiorari aii<l a|»|»eal restricted. — No conviction, judgment or oi'dcr in respect of any offence against the Act shall be removeil by certiorari or otherwise into any court of record, and no appeal is allowed from any such conviction, judgment or order to any court of general sessions or other court whatsoever, if the conviction h^f Vteen made by a stipendiary nuigistrate, recorder, judge of sessions, police magistrate, sitting magistrate, commis- sioner of a parish court, or any magistrate or officer having the powers of two or more justices of the peace. (11. S. C, c 106, sec. 119.) . This section takes away the right to a certiorari, except where the magistrate proceeds without jurisdiction (2), or where there is no offence shown. (3) It has been held that the refusal by a justice to allow the de- fendant to give evidence on a trial of an infoi'mation under the (1 ) Ex parte White, 30 S. C. N. B. 12, (2) R. V. Saunderson, 12 Ont. R. 178. (3) R., V. Elliott, 12 Unt. R. 524. INTOXICATING LIQUORS. — SCOTT ACT. COl Act, is a matter going to tiio justice's jurisdiction, and that, there- fore, a certiorari will Ho to remove the conviction, (1) Where a conviction for selling intoxicating liquor contrary to the jirovisions of the Act, contained no reference to the Act, did not show wht re the offence was committed, and merely adjudged that the defendant pay 8100 for selling intoxicating liquors, the Court held the conviction bad, and that the information and warrant could not be looked at to see that an offence had been committed. (2; A druggist, licensed to sell intoxicating liquors, on prescription, for medicinal purposes, as authorized by the Canada Temperance Act, was convicted of violating the jjrovisions of the second ]>art of the Act, on evidence that his clerk had sold intoxicating liquor for other than medicinal purposes. At the trial the clerk testified that he had been directed by his employer not to sell liquors except on prcscrijttion. On this point the defendant applied for a certiorari, and moved to quash the conviction ; and it was held by the Court, in quashing the conviction, that t here was no offence proved against the applicant, that the act of selling was, under the circumstances, the indeptMident crime of the clerk, and that, therefore, the magis- trate had no jurisdiction. (3) An application was made for a rule for a certiorari to remove a conviction for a third offence against the Canada Temperance Act, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant was the same person who had been convicted of the previous offences stated in the information. At the trial, certificates of these pi-e- viouH convictions against the defendant were put in evidence, as pi'ovided for by the Act. For the defence, it was contended that proof should have been given to show that the defendant was the person named in the previous convictions. Held, that the same name in the pi-ovious convictions was some evidence of the iden- tity of the defendant, and in the absence of proof to the contrary, the niagisti'ate was justified in convicting him. (4) Three summary convictions having been made b}^ a stipendiary (1) Ex parte Legere, 27 S. C. N. B. 292. (2) Woodlock V. Dickie, 6 Rusi. & Geld. 86. (:^) Ex parte McKeen, 13 C. L. T. 24 J. (4) Ex parte Dugan, 13 C. L. T. 249. (102 PRACTICAL UUIUI TO MAOIHTKATEH. mHgiBtrato in ami for the county of Pictoii, tigainHt a defoiidani I'or violation of tlie Canada Temperance Act, u motion was madv for a certiorari to remove them into the Superior Court to be quanhed on the ground, in particular, that the magistrate was not legally appointed, the municipality of IMctou county for which lie was act- ing not having hecii ('onstituted a |)oli(H< division either prior to or at the time of his appointment under the Acts of the Jjegislature of Nova Scotia for 18»1, c. 48, Sec. 2. On reference to the history of the appointment of stipendiary magistrates in Nova Scotia, and the erection of the police divisions over which tliey were to preside, and having regard to the statutory provision that the territorial jurisdiction of the county magistrate should he constituted either prior to or concurrently with his ap- pointment, and it appearing by affidavit that this had not been done, it was held that the nmgistrate's a]>pointment was invalid, and that having acted without jurisdiction the certiorari must issue and that the conviction on its return into court should be<iua8hed. (1) W. was summaril}' convicted under the Canada Temperance Act. The only objections to the con\ietion were, 1, That a justice of the peace can tr}' a summary conviction case oidy in the parish where he resides, and, 2, that a certiticate of dismissal for a similar offence covering the period charged was a bar to the second informa- tion. In this case, the information was for selling liquor on the 8th July, and at the hearing the defendant put in evidence a cer- tificate of dismissal of an information for a like otfeiice " within three months last jtast, to wit, on the TthJuly." Helil that a justice of the peace can hear a summary conviction case in any part of the county for which he is a justice and that a certificate of dis- missal covering three months is no bar to a subsequent infornia- tion for a like ott'ence under the Canada Temperance Act committed during that period unless it is shown that the information i^ for the same olience. (2) By a summary conviction for an oflf'ence against the Canada Temperance Act the defendant was ordered to pay a fine of $50 and costs, and in default of })ayment his goods were to be distrainetl. (1) R. V. Roberts, 14 C. L. T. 481. (2) Ex parte Whalen, 14 C. L. T. 107 INTOXICATING MQtIORW. 603 nnd in dofaiilt of diHtroKH he was to bo imprisoned. Tim Hno not itoing paid a diwtreHH warrant was isHiicd to a t'onHtal)le to whom tho defendant pointed out on his premises a cask of wiiisitey, worth $160, as a siifHcient distress. The constal»le refused lo levy on tho whiskey and returned the distress warrant with tho endorsement tluit he luid searched for and could not tind sutWciont goods of the defendant upon which to levy tho tine and costs. The magistrate thereupon issued a warrant of commitment, under which the de- fendant was imprisoned. Upon application, on tho return of a habeas corpus, for an order to discharge the defendant, it was contended that the constable was not bound to levy on the whiskey, as the sale of it by him under the distress warrant would of itself bo an offence against the Canada Temperance Act. \in\ the court hold that tho whiskey was l)roporty that could be properly taken under tho distress warrant and that there was nothing in the Canada Temperance Act lo pre- vent the sale thereof for judicial purposes; and tho defendant was discharged, as being wrongly in custody. (1) Indians. — As to the punishment of perscms for selling or suj)- plyi!ig intoxicating li(iuors to Indians, and the punishment of Indian'^ for making or having intoxicants or selling them to other Indians, see the Indian Act. II. S. C. c. 43, sees. !)'!-!•(!, and 51 Vic. c. 22. sec. '1. Where an information, laid against the defendant under the Indian Act, charged that hesoltl liquor to two persons on the 5th July and to two persons on the Htli July, and the Justices, notwithstanding that the defendants counsel objected to tho information on this ground, heard evidence in resjiect of all the offences so charged, then amended the information by substituting tho 8th August for the Sth July, proceeded and heard evidence in respect of tho sub- stituteil charge, and dismissed it, but convicted the ilefemlaut for selling to two persons on tho Sth July, tho conviction was quashed, the Court holding that it was the duty of the Justices, when tho objection was taken, lo have amendetl the information by striking out one or other of the charges and to have then heard tho evidjuee a])plical)lo to the remaining charge only. (2) [1) Ex parte Fitzp&trick, 14 C. \ J. T.o I. (2) R. V. Alward, 14 C L. T., 338. - ■ 89 *'<I4 I'KAOTtOAr, orrOR m MAmMTRATES. Till' Canada Temperance Art can have no o|K'ratii»n wlioro (liu Indian Act is in t'ono. (I) I'lrm.ii^ WoitKM, — Ah to proliihilinu; (liy in'oclaniation of tho (JoviTiior (it'ncral in Council), tlu> Kale t>t' inloxicatinjtf liquor in till* vicinity of any puhlic work, si>o U. S. C c. 161, socs. liMK. KIDNAI'l'INri. 14i4liiii|»|»lii}(. — Kv(<ry ono Ih /^^niilty of an in(lictal)l(> otloiifo and lialilo tosi'von yi-ars' iiuprisonnuMit \\\w,withwit lawful authority, forciliiy Hi'izi's and contini'H oi- iniprison.s any other ]>orHou within Caiuida, or kidnu)m any other ])erH()n with intent : — (a) to lause Huch other porHon to bo seeretly eontined or iinpri- Honed in Canada aguinHt his will ; or (6) to cause sueh other person to be unlawfully sent or trans- ported out of Caiuida against his will ; or (c) to onnse such other person to bo sold or captured as a slave, or in any way held to service against his will. 2. Upon tho trial of any oftbnco under this section the non-resis- tance of the person, so kidnap[>e<l or unlawfully contined, thereto, shall not be a defence, unless it appears. that it was not causi'd by threats, duress or force or exhibition of force. (Code, Art. 2(»4.) The intent applies as well to the seizing and ct)ntining or inipri- woning as to the kidnapping (2) LANDI-Oai) AND TENANT. Tln't't by TciiaiitN or li04l|{;«>rN. — Kvery one who steals any chattel or fixture let to be u.sed by bim or her in or with any house or lodging is guilty of an indictable ort'once and liable to two years' imprisonment, and, if the value of such chattel or fixture exceeds the sum of twenty-five dollars, to four years" imprisonment. (Code, Art.;r22.) liiJiirioN to biiildiii^N by t<>iiaiitM, i>tc.— Kvery one is i^uilty of an indictable ott'cnce and liable to five years' imprison- (1) Re Metcalfe, 17 Ont. R. 357. (2) Cornwall v. R., 33 U. C. Q. B. 106 ; Buib. Dig. 246. r,ANI»S MAIIKH. — LEVYINO WAR, 6()6 im^iil, \vli(», lu'iiig poMMOHsi'd of any (IwclliiijLC-lioiiw or^'othor build- ing, or |iar( ol any (Iwciiing-houso oroihor imilding wiiicli is Imilt on lands Hultjcct lo u mortgage oi- whicdi is lu'ld \'i>v any term of yearn or otlier K-hh tei-in, or at will, or held ovi'r after the terminu- tion of any tenancy, wilfully and to the projudiee of the niortgagou i'\- ownei- : — (a) pulls down or demoliHlieH, or liegins to^pull d(»wn or (lumolish the same or any pin't thereof, or removes oi" liei,'inM to remove the Hunu) or any part thereof from the premise.s on whicii it is erected ; or (6) pulls down orsevers from the fretdiold any fixture Hxod in or to Hueh dwi'lling-hoUMe or huilding, or part of hucIi dwelling- house or huilding. (Coile. Art, 5(14.) r.A.NO MAUK8. lii|uri<'Nlo liiiidiiiarkNNliowiiiK;tliol»oiiiiduri<'N of a |»r4»viii<*«s county, <'itj, fo%«ii, «'l<«,— (Soo Code, Articles r)(»5 and 5(Ki.) IiiJiirif'N to fViKM'N. wuIIn or |>om1n oii tli(> l»oiiii«l- ary of any land. «»<<•• — (See Code, Article 5(>7.) r,AUcE.\v See Theft, ;;y5^ LEVYINU WAR. Kvery suhjeet or citizen of aiij' foreign state or country at peace with Her Majesty, who — (a.) is or continues in arms against Her Majesty within Canada; or (6.) commits any act of hostility therein ; or (c.) outers Canada with intent to levy war against Her Majesty, or to commit anj' indictable offence therein for which any person would, in Canada, be liable to sufi'or death , and Every subject of Her Majesty within Canada who — \d.) levies war against Iler Majestj' in company with any of the --\.- 606 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. subjects or citizens of any foreign state or country at peace with Her Majesty : or (e.) enters (]!anada in company with any such subjects or citizens with intent to levy war against Her Majesty, or to commit any such offence therein ; or (/.) with intent to aid and assist, joins himself to any person who has entered Canada with intent to levy war against Her Majesty, or to commit any such offence therein, is guilty of an in- dictable offence and liable to suffer death. (Code, Art. (S.) Pei*80ns offending against the provisions of this article may be tried and punished either by any Superior Court of C minal Juris- diction, or by a Militia court martial. (Code, Articles 539, 540 ; E. 8. C, c. 14b*, sees. 6 and 7.) LIBEL. Blasphemous I^ibel. — (See Blasphemy, ante, p. 478.) Defamatory lilbel. — A defamatory libel is matter pub- lished, without legal justification or excuse, likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or designed to insult the person to whom it is published. 2. Such matter may be expressed either in words legibly marked upon any substance whatever, or by any object signifying such matter otherwise than by words, and may be expressed either directly or by insinuation or irony. (Code, Art. 285.) Publishing a libel is exhibiting it in public, or causing it to be read or seen, showing or delivering it or causing it to be shown or delivered, Avith a view to its being read or seen by the person defamed or by any other person. (Code, Art. 286.) Privileged eommnnlcatlons — Invited or chal. Ien8;ed publleatlons. — No one commits an offence by pub- . liishing defamatory matter on the invitation or challenge of the person defamed thereby, nor if it is necessary to publish such defamatory matter in order to refute some other defamatory state- ment published by that person concerning the alleged offender, if such defamatory matter is believed to be true, and is relevant to LIBEL. 607 the invitation, challenge or the required refutation and the pub- lishing docs not in manner or extent exceed what is reasonably sufficient for the occasion. (Code, Art. 287.) PubliNhliiK Im Courts of Justice.— No one commits all ott'ence by publishing any defamatory matter, in any proceed- ing held before or under the authority of any court exercising judicialaut hority, or in any inquiry made under the authority of any statute or by order of Her Majesty, or of any of the <lepart- mci ,s of Government, Dominion or Provincial. (Code, Art. 288.) l-nblishinj^ Parliauientary Papers.— Xo one com- mits ; n offence by publishing to either the Senate, or House of Commons, or to any Legislative Council, Legislative Assembly or House of Assembly, defamatory matter contained in a petition io any such body, or by publishing by order or under the authority of any such body any paper containing defamatory matter or by publishing, in good faith and without ill-will to the person defamed, any extract from or abstract of any such paper. (Code, Art. 289.) Fair Reports of 1' oceediuj^s of Parliauient and Courts. — No one ( ommiis an offence by publishing in good faith, for public information, a fair report of the proceedings of the Senate or House of Commons, or any committee thereof, or of any such Council or Assembly, or any committee thereof, or of the public proceedings pbelihinarv or final heard before any court exercising judicial authority, nor by publishing, in good faith, any fair comment upon any such proceedings. (Code, Art. 290.) This rule applies to all courts of justice, superior or inferior. (1) It is immaterial whether the proceeding be ex parte, or not ; and recent decisions in England, — where the law, as to reports of pro- ceedings in courts of justice, is not so wide as ours, as now expressed in the above Article, — show that if is also immaterial whether the matter be one over which the court has jurisdiction or not. Formerly, the law was not construed so as to privilege reports of ex parte proceedings before police magistrates or justices of the (1) Lewis V. Levy, E. B. & E. 537; 27 L. J. Q. B., 287. 608 PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. pjace ; and many Judges, by thciv dicta, denied any privilege to fair and accurate reports of ex" joar^e proceedings, even in the superior courts ; (1) but other judges have since taken a dift'eront view. (2) The hiw became settled, by the decision in Usiil's case, in which it was held that the privilege extended to all bona fide and correct reports of all proceedings in a magistrate's court, whether ex parte or otherwise. (3) Fair Kcportft of JPubllc jVIeetIii}i;s. — No one com- mits an olt'once by publishing in good faith, in a newspaper, a fair report of the proceedings of any public meeting lawfully convened for a lawful purpose and open to the public, and if such report is fair and accui*ate, and if the publication of the matter complained of is for the public benefit ; provided the defendant does not refuse to insert, in a conspicuous place, in the newspaper in which the report appeared, a reasonable letter or document of explanation or contradiction by or on behalf of the prosecutor. (Code, Art. 291.) Fair DlHCllStsioil. — No one commits an offence by publish- ing any defamatory matter which he, on reasonable grounds, be- lieves to be true, and which is relevant to any subject of public interest, the public discussion of which is for the public benefit. (Code, Art. 292.) Fair Coninient. — No one commits an offence by pubHsh- ing fair comments upon the public conduct of a person who takes part in public affaii'S ; nor by publishing fair comments on any published book or other literary production, or any com position or work of art or performance publicly exhibited, or any other com- munication made to the public on any subject, if such comments are confined to criticism on such book or literary production, com- position, work of art, performance or communication. (Code, Art. 293.) CoMMEm and criticism on matters of public interest stand on a different footing from reports of judicial or parliamentary pro- (1) Maale, J., in Hoare v. Bilverlock, 9 C. B. 23, Abbott, C. J., in Duncan v. Thwaites, 3 B. & C, 5o6. (2) Cockburn, C. J., in Waion v. Walter, L. R. 4 Q. B. 87 ; and Lawrence J., in R. v. Wright, 8 T. R. 298. (3) Usill v. Hales, Usill v. Breasley, & Usill v. Clarke. 3 C. P. D., 206-324, 47 L. J., C. P. 323, 380. LIBEL. 609 ceedings. A report is tho mcchjiiiical reproduction, more or less condensed or abridged, of what has actually taken phice. comment is the judgment passed on tho circumstances reported by one who has applied his mind to them, fair reports are privileged com- munications ; while fair comments, if on matters of public interest, are as such no libels at all. (1) Necking Ueiiiedy for Orievance. — No one commits an offence by publishing defamatory matter for the purpose, in good faith, of seeking remedy or redress for any private or public wrong or grievance from a person who has, or is reasonably believed by the i)erson })ublishing to haoe, the right or be under obligation to remedy or redress such vvrong or grievance, if the defamatory matter is believed by him to be true, and is relevant to the remedy or redress sought, and such publishing docs not in manner or isx- tent exceed what is reasonably sufficient for the occasion. (Code, Art. 294). AnHwers to Inquiries. — No one commits an offence by publishing, in answer to inquiries made of him, defamatory matter relating to some subject as to which the pei'sou by whom, or on whose behalf, the inquiry is made has, or on reasonable grounds is believed by the pei'sou publishing to have, an interest in knowing the truth, if such matter is published for the purpose, in good faith, of giving information in respect thereof to that pei'son, and if such defamatory matter is believed to bo true, and is relevant to the inquiries made, and also if such publishing does not in manner or extent exceed what is reason"'" ly sufficient for the occasion. (Code, Art. 295.) If A., is about to have dealings with B., but first comes to C, and confidentially asks him his opinion of B., C.'s answer is privileged. (2) Giving; Information. — No one commits an offence by publishing to another person defamatory matter for the purpose of giving information to that person with respect to some subject as to which he has, or is, on reasonable grounds, believed to have, such an interest in knowing the truth as to make the conduct of (1) Odg. Lib. &S1. 36. (2) Story v. Challands, 8 C. & P. 234. 610 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. the person giving the information reasonable under the circum- stances : Provided, that such defamatory matter isx-elevanttosuch subject, and that it is either true, or is made without ill-will to the person defamed, and in the belief, on reasonable grounds, that it is triu'. (Code, Art. 29(!). $4elliiiK perio«liealN containing defamatory I^ihel. — Every proprietor of any newspaper is presumed to be criminally responsible for defamatory matter inserted and pub- lished thei-ein, but such presumption may be I'obutted by proof that the particular defamatory matter was inserted without such proprietor's cognizance, and without negligence on his part. 2. General authority given to the person actually inserting such defamatory matter to manage or conduct, as editor or otherwise, such newspajier, and to insert therein what he in his discretion thinks tit, shall not be negligence unless it be proved that the pro- prietor, when originally giving such general authority, meant that it should extend to inserting and publishing defamatory matter, or continued such general authority knowing that it had been exer- cised by inserting defamatory matter in any number or part of such newspaper. 3. No one is guilty of an oit'ence by selling any number or part of such newspaper, unless he knew either that such number or part contained defamatory matter, or that defamatory matter was habitually contained in such newspaper. (Code, Art. 297.) ISellini; books containing defamatory matter. — No one commits an offence by selling any book, magazine, l>amphletJor other thing, whether foi-ming part of any periodical or not, although the same contains defamatory matter, if, at the time of such sale, he did not know that such defamatory matter was contained in such book, magazine, pamphlet or other thing. 2. The sale by a servant of any book, magazine, pamphlet or other thing, whether periodical or not, shall not make his employer criminally responsible in respect of defamatory matter contained therein, unless it be proved that such employer authorized such sale knowing that such book, magazine, pamphlet or other thing contained defamatory matter, or, in case of a number or part of a periodical, that defamatory matter waa habitually contained in .such periodical. (Code, Art. 298.) LIBKL. — LOTTERIES. 611 When truth in a defence. — It Bhall be a defence to an indictment or information for a defamatory libel that the publishing of the defamatory matter in the manner in which it was published was for the public bei^eht at the time when it was published, and ; that the matter itself was true. (Code, "Art. 2))1>.) Extortion by defainiatory libel. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' imprisonment, or to a fine not exceeding six hundred dollars, or to both, who publishes or threatens to publish, or offers to abstain from ])ubli8hing, or offers to i>revcnt the publishing of a defamatory libel with intent to extort any money, or to induce any person to confer upon or procure for any person any appointment or office of profit or trust, or in consecjuence of any person having been refused any such money, appointment or office. (Code, Art. 300.) PnniNliinent of* defamatory lil»el.— Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' imprison- ment or to a fine not exceeding four hundred dollars, or to both, who publishes any defamatory libel knowing the same to be false. (Code, Art. 301.) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to one year's imprisonment, or to a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars, or to both, who ])ublishes any defamatory libel. (Code, Art. 302.) LOTTERIES. Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' imprisonment and to a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, who — (a) makes, prints, advertises or publishes, or causes or procures to be made, printed, advertised or published, any proposal, scheme or plan for advancing, lending, giving, selling or in any way dis- jiosing of any property, l)y lots, cards, tickets, or any mode of chance whatsoever ; or (b) sells, barters, exchanges or otherwise disposes of, or causes or procures, or aids or assists in the sale, bar- ter, exchange, or other disposal of, or offers for sale, barter or ex- change any lot, card, ticket or other means or device for advanc- ing, lending, giving, selling or otherwise disposing of any property, by lots, tickets, or any mode of chance whatsoever. 612 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. 2. Every one is guilty of an ott'once and liable on summavy con- viction to a penalty of twenty dollars, who buys, takes or receives any such lot, ticket or other device as aforesaid. S. Every sale, loan, gift, barter or exchange of any property, by any lottery, ticket, card or other mode of chance depending upon or to be determined by chance or lot, is void, and all such propei-ty so sold, lent, given, bartered or exchanged, is liable to be forfeited to any person who sues for the same by action or information in any court of competent jurisdiction. ^ ■i. No such forfeiture shall affect any right or title to such prop- erty acquired by any bona fide purchaser for valuable con,sideration without notice. , 5. This section includes the printing or publishing, or causing to be printed or published, of any advertisement, scheme, proposal or plan of any foreign lottery, and the sale or olfer for sale of any ticket, chance or share, in any such lottery, or the advertisement for sale of such ticket, chance or share. fi. This section does not apply to (a) the division by lot or chance of any property by joint tenants or tenants in common, or persons having joint interssts {droits indivis) in any such property ; or (bj RAFFLES for pr.'ZEP OF SMALL VALUE at any BAZAAR held for any chai-itable object, n' permission to hold the samje has been ob- tained from the city or other municipal council, or from the mayor, reeve, or other chief officer of the city, town or other municipality wherein such bazaar is held, and the articles raflled for thereat have first been offered for ssJe and none of them are of a value exceed- ing FIFTY DOLLARS ; ov (c) any distribution by lot among the mem- bers or ticket-holders of any incorporated society established for the encouragdient of art, of any paintings, drawings or other work of art produced by the labour of the member« of, or publish- ed by or under the direction of such incorporated society ; or (<i) the CreditFoncier Bas-Canada, or to the Credit Foncier Franco- Oanadien. (Code, Art. 206.) Article 2920 of the Eevised Statutes of Quebec (as amended by 53 Vic. c. 36, Que.) provides that whenever it is intended to hold a bazaar or lottery, the object whereof is to assist in the construc- tion or support or to aid in the payment of the debt of any church, LOTTERIES. 613 chiipel or other religious building, of an hospital, of an uHyinm or any charitable establishment whatever or of any establishment of public interest or for instruction, or of any educational establish- ment or of a colonization society, within the limits of the province, such bazaar or lottery may take place without any BESTiiiCTtoN AS TO AMOUNT provided always that if they are of a permanent character, it shall be necessary to obtain the previous permission of Lieutenant-Governor in Council ; and provided the things offer- ed or to be disposed of by lottery do not consist of sums of money, notes, bank notes, bonds, debentures or other negociable securities of like nature. But it has been held that this legislation is ultra vires the Quebec legislature and an unconstitutional encroachment upon the powers of the Dominion jmrliament, which alone has the power to legislate on the subject of lotteries. (1) A lottery is defined to be " a distribution of prizes by lot or chance." (2) The proprietor of a paper conducted competitions as follows : In the paper there was inserted a sentence with a word missing. In- tending competitors were required to cut out a coupon attached to the paper, to guess at and write, on the coupon, what they guessed as the missing word, and to then send the coupon with a fee of one shilling for each coupon to the proprietor, who fixed before hand the missing word, and placed it in a sealed envel.i|jo in the hands of a chartered accountant, who verified the result of the competi- tion. Held, that the competition constituted a lottery within the meaning of the Imperial Statute, 42 Geo. 3, c. 119. (3) Where a defendant, being the proprietor of a newspaper, adver- tized in it that, whoever should guess the number nearest to the number of beans, placed in a sealed jar in a window in a publie street, should receive a 020 gold piece, that the person making the second nearest guess should receive a set of harness, and that the person making the third nearest guess should receive a $5 gold piece, — any person desiring to compete being required to buy a (1) Pigeon V. Mainville. and Mainville v. Poitras, 17 L. N. 68. See also R. v. Harper, 1 Que. Off. Rep. (S. «i C. C.) 327. (2) Per Hawkins, J., iu Taylor /k Smetton, 52 L. J. M. C, 101. (3) Barclay v. Pearson, 3 F„ (1893), 388. <J14 PRACTICAL GUIDE T<> MAGISTRATES. copy of the nowspupor atul to write, oti ii coupon to bo cut from the paper, his name and his guess of the number of l>oans, — it was hehl that as the approximation of the number depemleil as much upon the exercise of skill and judgment as upon chance, this was not a Mi»nE of oiiance for the disposal of property within the mean- ing of the Act against lotteries. (1) Where a defendant placetl in his shop window a sealed glass jar full of buttons of (litlerent si/A's. and oH'ered to give, to anyone who should guess the nearest to the number of buttons contained in thejar, apony and cart, the successful guesser being re(|uired to purchase goods of the defendant to a certain amount, it was held that as the approximation of the number of buttons depended on the exercise of judgment, obseiwation and mental eftbrt, this was not a MODE OK CHANCE for disposing of property. (2) A defendant was summarily convicted of an oti'ence against sec. 2 of the l». S. C, c. 15JI, The defendant's mode of operation was as follows. lie held a kind of concert in a certain hotel in Winni- peg, and he then proceeded to sell boxes of what he called " Parker's PaciHc Pens." Before selling, he placed in an empty box 100 en- velopes with a S5 l)ill in each, 15 envelo))es with a $10 bill in each, and one enveloi)e with a $50 in it, making in all $250 in 116 enve- lopes. He also placed in the same box IIC other envelopes con- taining blank pieces of paper. Kvery person paying $1 for one box of pens was entitled to draw one envelope, and a person pay- ing $5 for a box of pens could draw 8 envelopes ; but he would not take more than $5 from any one person in order as he said to pro- tect himself because in case he allowed any one man to take the 232 envelopes he would be $18 out of pocket besides the 232 boxes of pens. He said that if the $50 was drawn out before two thirds of the pens were sold he would put in another $50 bill and 50 more envelopes containing blanks. He also said he was not selling the envelopes ; ho would not take $20 for one of them ; but that he sold the pens and distributed the money to advertize the pens. A box of the pens was worth not more than ten cents. Held, that the defendant was offering for sale and selling the pens as a means (1) R. v. Dodds, 3 Ont R 390. (2) R. v. Jamieson, 7 Ont R. 149 LOTTERIES.— MAINTENANOB. 615 or dovico for dinjioHing of tho proporty cncloBccl in tho onvolopes by a mode of ehiuu-c, that it wan not neceHsaiy to enquire whether the uliogod object of tho accused, — the advertizing of this particu- lar l^ind of pens, — was his I'eal objector a subterfuge, but that an act constituting an otfence under the statute was equally an offence if done to attract attention to particular wares or if tho article dis- posed of had an intrinsic value which might be an inducement to purchase it, and that where tho selling of the article was in itself ii means oi' device for disposing by chance of the money, there was ;i broach of tho statute ; and the conviction was accordingly main- tained. (1) In an Ontario case, a defendant, — who told customers to whom ho sold tea that amongst tho cars of tea which he had on his shel- ves for sale at $1 each, there woro some cans containing articles of value, including a gold watch, a diamond ring, and $20 in money, — was convicted of selling cans of tea as a moans of disjmsing of a gold watch, etc., by a mode of chance. (2) A., a shopkeeper, was convicted of kkepino an unauthorized lot- tery, contrary to the Imperial Statute 42, Geo. III., c. 119, and B., a wholesale confectioner, was convicted of aidinq, abittino, COUNSELLING AND PBocuRlNO A. to commit the offence, it being proved that sweetmeats, some of which contained small money prizes, had been sold by B. to A., with a view to the latter retail- ing these sweetmeats, and the chances which persons buying them would have of winning a money prize, and that A. had a quantity of these sweetmeats in his shop on sale to the public. Held, that the convictions were right. (3) As to WARRANTS TO SEARCH LOTTERIES, ETC., SCO p. 124, ante. Maintenance. ]>iity to provide ncccssarlest ol* life. — Every one who has charge of any other person unable, by reasons either of detention, age, sickness, insanity or any other cause, to withdraw himself from such charge, and unable to provide himself with the (1) R. V. Parker, 13 C.-L. T., 316. (2) R. V. Freeman, 18 Ont. R., 524. (3) Barratt v. Burden, 10 R. Dec. (1894) 505. filfi I'KACTtCAI, (liriDE To MAdlSTKATEH. necessarioH of liCo, is, wlictluT muoIi cliarj^c is uiHlortiiki'ii liy him umk-r any conlract, or iw imposi'd upon liiin liy law, or hy ivasoii of liis iiiilawfiii act, uiidor a Ic/^al iluty t<> supply that porsoii with tho iiiH'ossarios of life, ainl is ('riiniiially rcsponsihii' for omitting^ witliont lawful oxcuso, to porforin sucli tluty if tho di'utli of such porsou is i'aus(^(l, or if his lifo is oiidangi'ivd, or his health lias Itoon or is liki'ly to hv pennaiuiiitly injurod, hy sucii omission. (Codo, Art. 200.) FiVory one who us parent, guardian or head of a family is under u legal duty to j)rovido necessaries for any diild under the age of six. teen years, is criminally i-esponsiblo for omitting, without lawful excuse, to dw so wliile such child remains a momher of his or her iiousehold, whether such child is helpless or not, if the death of Buch child is caused, or if his life is endangered or his health is or is likely io be permanently injured, by such omission. 2. Kvery one who is under u legal duty to provide necessaries for his wife, is criminally responsible for omitting, without lawful excuse, so to do, if the death of his wife is caused, or if her life is endangered, or her health is or is likely to be permanently injured by such omission. (Code, Art. 210.) lOvery one who, as master or mistress, has contracted to provide necessary food, clothing or lodging for any servant or apprentice under the age of sixteen years is under a legal duty to provide the same, and is criminally responsible for omitting, without lawful excuse, to perform such duty, if the death of such servant or apprentice is caused, or if his life is endangered, or his health has been or is likely to be permanently injui-ed, by such omission. (Code, Art. 211.) ]VeKlectiii}( fluty to provide nceeNNarioN. — Every one is guilty of an indictable ott'ence and liable to three years' im- prisonment who, being bound to perform any duty specified in sections two hundred and nine, two hundred and ten and two hun- dred, and eleven without lawful excuse neglects or refuses to do so ; unless the offence amounts to culpable homicide. (Code, Art. 215. as amended by 56 V., c. 82.) See Abandonment op child, p. 426, ante. mahiuade. — master and skrvant. (517 Mandamus. See |i|). 54-57, ante. , ' . . , Manslauuiitkh. See p. 608, ante. .MARItlAdE. FciKlK'd iiiarriil)(<>K. — Hvery one is guilty of an indictable otlence and liable to seven years' imprisonment wlio procures a feigned or j)rotcnded marriage between himself and any woman, or who knowingly aids and assists in procuring such feigned or pretended marriage. (Code, Art. 277.) Nolciniiixiiiie luurriiiKC without lawful author- ity. — This is an indictable oft'ence punishable by fine, or two years' imprisonment or botli. (Code, Art. 279.) Nol«nini#iatiou of* niarriaK«> coutrary to law. — Every one is guilty of an indictable ott'ence and liable to a fine, or to one year's imprisonment, who, being lawfully authorized, know- ingly and wilfully solemnizes any marriage in violation of the laws of the province in which the marriage is solemnized. (Code, Art. 280.) Master and Servant. Causlui^; bodily harm to a Nervant or appren- tices. — It is an indictable offence i^unishablo by three years' im- prisonment for any master or mistress, legally liable to provide for any servant or apprentice, to unlawfully do or cause bodily harm to such servant or apprentice so that the latter's life is endangered or so that the latter's health has been or is likely to be permanently injured. (Code, Art. 217.) Bfeglcct to provide nc.eosNarloN. — (See Mainten- ance, pp. 615, 616, ante.') See Criminal Breaches of Contract, at p. 508, ante, and Inti- midation, at ]). 580, ante. 618 ' , PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAQISTBATES. MBDICINK AND SURGERY. Art. 3998 of the R. S. Q. impoeos a penalty of $50 on any person who, in contravention of the law respecting physicians and sur- geons and their registration, practices medicine, surgery or raid- wifeiy, in the province of (Quebec, for hire or for or in the hope of money, goods, effects or any reward whatsoever, or who illegally assumes the title of doctor, physician, surgeon, etc., or who in any advertizement in any newspaper or in circulars or on busi- ness cards or signs, assumes any title, name or designation of such a nature as to lead the public to believe that he is duly registered or qualified as a practitioner of medicine, surgery or midwifery, or who offers or gives his services as a physician, surgeon or accoucheur for hire, gain or hope of reward, and if he be not duly authorised and registered in the province. The Ontario Acts, on the subject are the R. S. O. c, 148, and 54 Vic. c. 26 and 56 Vic. c. 27. Sec. 45 of the R. S. O. c. 148, enacts that it shall not bo lawful for any person, not registered, to jiractice medicine, surgery or midwifery for hire, gain or hope of reward ; and if any person not registered pursuant to the Act, for hire, gain or hope of reward, practices or profeswes to practice medicine, surgery or midwifeiy, or advertizes to give advice in medicine, surgery or midwifery, he shall upon summary conviction thereof, for any and every ott'ence, pay a penalty not exceeding $100 nor less than $25. There must be more than one act to constitute jiractising. (1) A conviction under the R. S. O. c. 148, sec. 45, for practising medicine for hire, was held bad for uncertainty in not specifying the particular act or acts which constituted the practising ; and the Court refused to amend, and quashed the conviction where the evidence shewed that the practising consisted in telling a man which of several patent medicines sold by the defendant was suit - able to the complaint which the man indicated, and in selling the man some of the medicine. (2) (1) Apothecaries Co. v. Jones, 5 R. (189.. ), 101. (2) R. V. Coulson, 24 Ont. R. 246. MEDU3INB AND 8URQBRY. — MISCIHEF. 619 But whore a ])or8on went into a druggist's shop, stating that he was sick, and describing his symptoms to the druggist, whereupon the latter said he believed it was the diarrhoea, and, after telling the pereon to live on a milk diet, gave him a bottle of medicine, for which he charged him fifty cents, it was. — upon these facts and upon the druggist's own admission that he had everal kinds of diarrh(Pa mixture and had to sometimes enquire as to symptoms in order to decide what mixture would be suitable, — held, that there was a practising of medicine within sec. 46 of the R. S. O. c. 1*8, and that the fact of the druggist being registered under the Phar- macy Act, R. S. O. c. 151, which entitled him to act as an apo- thecary as well as a druggist, did not authorize the practice of medicine. (1) See Poison, post. MISCHIEF. The subject of mfschief or malicious injuries to persons and to property is cove 3d by Articles 481-511 of the Code. Article 481 enacts that every one who causes any event by an act which he knew would probably cause it, being reckless whether such event happens or not, is deemed to have caused it wilfully : but that nothing shall be an ott'ence under any provision contained in the part relating to mischief, unless it is done without legal justification or excuse and without color of right. The Article also enacts that where the offence consists in an injury to anything in which the offender has an interest, the existence of such interest if partial, shall not prevent his act beiiig an offence, and, if total,, shall not prevent his act being an offence, if done with intent to defraud. As to ARSON, (which is included in the provisions of the Code relating to mischief), see pp. 450-454, ante. ^lischlef* on Kailwa,vs. — Kvery one is guilty of an in- dictable offence and liable to rive years' imprisonment, who, in manner likely to cause danger to valuable property, ivithmit endati- qering life or person, — (a.) places any obstruction upon any i-ailway, or takes up,, il) R. V. Howarth, 24 Ont. K, .501 ; 14 C L. T., 132. 40 620 PRACTICAL GUfDE TO MAGISTRATES. roinovea, disphices, breaks or iiijiires any rail, Hlee2)er or other matter or thing belonging tt» any railway ; or (6.) shoots or throwH anything at an engine or other railway vehicle ; or (c.) interferois without authority with the points, signals or other appliances upon any railway ; or (rf.) makes any false signal on or near any railway ; or (e.) wilfully omits to do any act which it is his duty to do ; or (f.) does any other unlawful act. 2. Every one who does any of the acts above mentioned, with intent to cause such danger, is liable to imprisonment for life. (Code, Art. 489.) , Wilfully obstruvtiiiK tlK* voiiMtriivtioii or uMe of any railway. — This is indictable and punishable by two years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 490.) A line of railway constructed and completed under the powers of an Act of parliament and intended for the conveyance of i)a8,sen- gors by locomotive power, but not yet used for that purpose, but only for the carriage of materials and workmen, is within the above Article. (1) Where a defendant by unlawfully altering some railway signals, at a railway station, caused a train to slacken speed and to come nearly to a stand, he was held guilty of ofcs/rMC^m^ a train within the meaning ol' sec. 30 of 24-25 Tie. c. 97, which is to the same effect as our Article 490. (2) Where a defendant, by holding up his arms in the mode used by inspectors of the line, when desirous of stopping a train, intention- ally induced the driver of a train to reduce his speed, although the train was not wholly stopped, but immediately afterwards resumed its ordinary speed, he was held to be guilty of an unlawful obstruction. (3) (1) R. V. Fradford, Bell, 268 ; 29 L. J. M. C, 171. (2) R. V. Hadfield, L. R., 1 C. C. R. 253; 39 L. J. M. C, 131. (3) R. V. Hardy, L. R., 1 C. C. R., 278 ; 40 L. J. M. C, 62. MISCHIKi-'. 621 A., without the consent of the railway compuny, took u trolley l)liice(l it on tlio tviick. ivnd ran with it, upon the railway for several uiilos ; and althou<j;h it was at a time when, ordinarily, no train was running thereon, A was held to have obstructed the free use of the railway. (1) InJiirloA to PackageN in OiiNtoily of Kailwayn. Kvery one is guilty of an otfeneo and liable, on summary conviction, to a i)enalty not exceeding twenty dollars, over and above the value of the goods or liquors so destroyed or damaged or to one month's imprisonment, with or without hard labour, or to both, who — (a.) wilfully destro3-.sor damages anything containing any goods or liquors in or about any railway station or building or any vehicle of any kind on any railway, or in any wai-ehouse, ship or vessel, with intent to steal or otherwise unlawfully to obtain or to injure the contents, or any part thereof ; or (6.) unlawfully drinks or wilfully spills or allows to run to waste any such liquor, or any part thereof. (Code, Art. 491.) Wilful IiiJiiricN to Klectric Tcl<>|(;rai>lis, Elec- tric IjiglitM, Telephones, or Fire Alariiiii. — This is indictable and punishable by two years' imprisonment. And a wil- ful attempt to commit any s^uch injury is punishable summarily by fine not exceeding $50, or 3 months' imprisonment with or without hard labour. (Code, Art. 492.) M'^reckiilK. — It is an indictable offence punishable by life imprisonment to wilfullj' cast away or destroy any ship, whether com])lete or untinished, or to do any act tending to the immediate loss or destruction of any ship in distress or to interfere with any marine signal or exhibit any false signal with intent to bring a ■ship or boat into danger. (Code, Art. 493.) And an attempt to cast away or destroy any ship, whether complete or unfinished, is indictable and punishable by 14 years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 494.) (1) R. V. Brownell, 26 N. B. R. 579; Bur. Di(j. 164. 622 PRACTICAL GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. Interfering with ^Warine Ni^nalN, Buoyn or Nea 9IarkH. — This is indictable and punirthablc by Hcven years' im- prisonment. And every one who nuil<es fast anj' vessel or boat to any signal buoy or sea mark is liable on summary conviction to a penalty not exceeding $10, and. in default of payment, to one month's imprisonment. (Code, Art. 495.) Preventing the Having ol wreeiced veNweiN or wreclc* — It is an indictable offence punishable by seven years' imprisonment, to wilfully prevent or impede or to endeavor to prevent or impede, (a) the saving of any vessel that is wrecked stranded or abandoned or in distress, or (6) any person in his en- deavor to save such vessel. And a person who wilfully prevents or impedes or endeavors to prevent or impede the saving of any wreck may be punished on conviction or indictment by two years' imprisonment or on summary conviction before two justices by 0400 tine or six months' imprisonment with or without hard labor. (Code, Art. 496.) Injnries to dams, piers, Hlides, ItooniM, raftn, ete. — This is indictable and punishable by two yeai-s' imprison- ment. (Code, Art. 497) jmiseliief* to mines. — This is indictable and punishable by seven years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 498.) If any act covered by this article be done under a bond fide claim of right, it will not be punishable. (1) A scaffold erected at some distance above the bottom of a mine, for the purpose of working a vein of coal on a level with the scaffold, was held to be an erection used in conducting the business of the mine. (2) H iseliief' eansing danger to life an«1 other se. rious flangers. — Article 499a makes it an indictable offence punishable by imprisonment for life for anyone to wilfully destroy or damage a dwelling-house, ship or boat, if the damage be caused (1) R v. Matthews, 14 fox, 5. (2) R. v. VVhittingham, 9 C, & P. 234, Arch. Cr. PI. & Ev. 21 Ed. 616. , MI8CHIEV. 62:^ by an explosion and any person be in such dwolling-houso, ship or boat, and tlio damage causes actiiai, danqeii to livk ; or to wil- fully destroy or damage a bank, dyke or wall of the sea or of any inland water and to thereby cause A(!Ti:ai, danoer of inundation ; or to wilfully destroy or damage any bridge, viaduct or aqueduct and to thereby render the same or any highway, railway or canal passing over or under the same danobkois ok i.mi'Assahi.e^; or to wilfully destroy or damage a railway with intent and so as to render it DANGEiiors < t imi'ASsahi.e. Other iiiiN«*liieffti. — If the object damagad be a ship in distress or if it be any cattle damaged by killing, maiming or wounding, the punishment is fourteen years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 41M)b.) If the damage bo done to a ship with intent to destroy or render it useless or to any goods in process of manufactureoranj' agricultural or manufacturing nuichinesor implements with intent to r>^nder them useless or to any private tishery, etc., etc., the ytunishment is seven years' imprisonment. (Code, Ai't. 499c.) If it be a damage amounting to $5 to a tree shrub or underwood growing in a park or garden, or in anj' land adjoining or belong- ing to a dwelling house, or if the damaged object be a post letter bag or post letter, letter box or any post parcel, or any property real or personal (to the extent of |20), damaged by night, the punish- ment is live years' im])risonment. (('ode. Art. -199D.) And if the damaged object be any property real or personal (to the extent of $iO), for damage to which no special punishment is by law pre- scribed the punishment is two years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 499E.) AVhere a prisoner, charged with maliciously killing a mare, had caused the death of the mare by inserting the handle of a fork into her vagma, and the jury found that the prisoner was not actuated by any motive except the gratification of his own depraved taste, fcnd that he did not intend to kill the mare, but knew that what he was doing would or might kill her, and nevertheless did what he did recklessly, and not caring whether the mare Avas injui'cd or not, it was held that his conviction was right. (1) (1) R. V. Welch, 1 Q. B. D. 23; 45 L. J. (M.C.) 17. 624 PRACTICAL GUIDB TO MAGISTRATES. To constitute u maiming, tho injury inflictod on tiio uninuil must ho a permanent 01W. (1) Whoro it is a wounding that is alloged, .the injury or damugo in- flicted upon or doiio to the aninuil need not be one producing a permanent injury, inasmuch as the legislature used the word " wounding " as contradistinguished from maiviing, which is a per- manent injury. (2) Where, upon an indictment for killing, wounding and maiming a mare, it appeared that the defendant poured nitrous acid into her ears, some of which acid ran into her eye or was poured into it, and blinded her : upon which the owner killed her ; and it ap- peared from the evidence of the surgeons that the injuries done to the mare's ears were wounds ; the defendant was convicted of maiming : and the judges hold the conviction right. (3) See Cattle, p. 495, ante, and ('rublty to Animals, p. 512, ante. The destruction of any part of a threshing machine which has been taken to pieces and separated by the owner is punishable under the above Article ; (4) and so is the destruction of a water- wheel by which a threshing machine is worked. (5) F- ^n if the sides of the machine be wanting, without which it will ily work imperfectly, it will be within the meaning of the above Article. (6) But it has been held, that where the machine had been taken to pieces and in part destroyed by the owner, from fear, the remain- ing parts did not constitute a machine. (7) Where a prisoner, in company with some other persons, unfast- ened and took away a certain part — called the half-jack — of a ma- chine, called a stocking-frame, without which the frame was use- less, but did no fui-thor injury either to the half-jack or to the frame, than the removal of the half-jack, the judges held that this (1) R. V. Jeans, 1 C. & K. 539. (2) R. v. Haywood, 2 East, P. C. 1076 ; R. & R. 16. (3) R. v. Owens, 1 Mood. C. C. 205. (4) R. v. Mackerel, 4 C. & P. 448. (5) R. V. Tidier, 4 C. & P. 449. (6) R. V. Bartlett. 2 Deacon. C. L. 1517. (7) R. V. West, 2 Deacon, C. L. 1518. MI8CHI1P. ' 826 WUH 11 (lumugiiig of tlio I'mmo, as it mudo tho friimo iinport'cct and inoperative. (1) Tho amount of injury dono moanH tho actual injury done to tho troo, etc., itself, and does not extend to consequential injury roHuiting from the act of the defendant. (2) It hiiH heon held that ono who cutH otf a portion of his neigh- bour's trees to protect his own property from the nuisance caused by boys throwing stones at the blossoms on such trees, and to secure the entrance of air and light to his own dwelling, cannot be said to bo acting under a fair and reasonable supposition that he has a right to do the acts complained of. (3) Ab tho act of tho offender must be dono wilfully, it was hold, in a case whore tho defendant threw, at some people with whom ho had been lighting, a stone which struck and broke tho windows of a house, that ho was wrongly convicted of unlawfully and maliciously committing damage, although it was intimated that, if the jury had found that the defendant knew that the window was where it was, when ho throw tho stone, and that he was likely to break it, and was reckless whether ho did so or not, tho decision might have been different. (4) Injuries to animals not being cattle.— (See Animals, p. 44-4, ante.) Injuries to buildings by tenants. — (Seep. 60i, ante) * Injuries to election documents. — (See Code, Art. 603.) Injuries to landmarks, fences, etc. — (See Landmarks, p. 606, ante.) Injuries to harbor bars. — (See Code, Art. 607a.) Injuries to trees, etc., wheresoever growing. — (See Code, Art. 508.) Injuries to vegetable productions growing in gardens, orchards, etc. — (See Code, Art. 509.) Injuries not otherwise provided for — Every ono who wil- fully commits any damage, injury or spoil to or upon any real or (1) R. V. Tacey, R. & R. 462. (2) R. y, Whiteman, Dears, 353 ; 23 L. J. (M.C.) 120. (3) Hamilton v. Bone, IG Cox, C. C. 437. (4) R. V Pembleton, L. R. ? C. C. R. 119. R. v. Welch, mpra. 626 PHAOTIOAI. OUIDK TO MAUISTUATES. porsonal proport)', oithov corporonl or incorpoival, ftinl oitlior of u public or |)riviitu natiiro, tor vvhicli no puiiiHlimuiit '\h otiior- wiHO providod, is ufuilly of an ort'ouco uiul liublo, on Hummary con- viction, to a pohalty not oxciuMling 020, and wucli further miuu not ox(!iHMling 820 as appears to l)e a nMiHonaltio compensation for the ilaniaife or injury done to tlie private property of the person ajjfj^rieveil. lo^i'tluir with costs ; and iniprisonnuMit, not exceeding two niontlis, with or without hard ialioi-, may Ite onhMvd in default of pa^'nu'ut. Hut notliin^ in this article is to extend to — (a.) any case where the pt*rson acted under a fair and reasomihle s\ipposition that ho had a right to do Iho act complained of; or (6.) any tres- pass, not being wilful and malicioiis. committed in hunting or Hsh- ing or in tiie pursuit of game, (Code. Art. 511.) MIHDEU. Soc \). 5t)5, ante. NAVIGATION. Mv'viKiitioii of C^tiiindiiiii untorN. — Chapter 7'.) of tho R. S. C. contains tlie rules with lospwct to lights, fog signals, steer- ing and sailing and rafts, and provides by sec. 2, that such rules shall apidy to all the rivers, lakes and other navigable waters within Canada or within tho jurisdiction of tho parliament there- of ; and by section 4, a wilful default to obey entails a penalty not exceeding $200 and not less than $20. Protection of navigable watcrN. — Section 7 of tho K. S. C. c. Jtl, prohibits tho throwing of any saw du.st, edgings, slabs, bark or rubbish, into any navigable river, stream or other water, under a pemdty of not less than $20 for a tirst ottonce and of not less than $50 for each subsequent ott'enco. NEULIOENCE. Dut.v of permoiiH doliiig daiiKeroiiN actN.— Every one who undertakes (except in case of ncjessitj') to administer surgical or medical treatment, or to do any other lawful act tho doing of which is or may bo dangerous to life, is under a legal duty to have and to use reasonable knowledge, skill and care in doing any such act, and is criminally responsible for omitting, without lawful excuse, to discharge that duty if death is caused by such omission. (Code, Art. 212.) NIDI.ICIKNOE. Iliity of* pcmoiiN In rhnriKO of dnii|i;«roHK( tlllllKN* — I'lvopy onu who Iiuh in liis chiirgd or iindttr IiIh control any tiling wlnitover, wlicthor tiniiiiult' or iiiaiiiiniitc, or who i-roctH, iniikoH or MuiintuinH aiiytliing wluitt'vcr whicli. in tlio uhHunco of proeimtion or c-are, may ondiingur human lit'o, iH tuxlor a loiral duty to tako roaHomil)U' juvcautions against, and use ri'aHoiuihlo caro to avoid hucIi dangor, and \h crimimdly rosponsihio lor llio coiiMoqucnccH of omitting, witliout hiwful oxcuwc, to jiorform Hueh duty. (Codo, Art. '213.) Iliity to avoid oiiiImnIoiin dniiKcroiiN to llfV. — Kvory one who undortakoH to do any act, tlio omiMnion to do whirh is or may hv dangoro\iH to lit'*', is un(Ur a logal <luty to do t'mt act, and is oriminall}' n'sponsihlt' for thi^ cons«'(|uonc'os of omitting, without lawful oxcuho, to itorform that duty. (Codo, Art. 213.) ]¥cKl«M*tlii|{; Child. -(Soo AnANnoNMKNT, p. 42G, ante.) IV4'Klc«'tln)( to |»i*ovld4> iit><*(>NNurii'M.--(Suo Main- tenance, p. (il5, GIG, ante.) M«>KliK«>iitl2»' «'iidaii|C4>riiiK tli«> NutVty oi' pcr- NOllN Oil rullwa,>'N. — Every one is guilty of an indictable oH'ence and liable to two years" imprisonmen! who, by any unlaw- ful act, or Ity nwy wilful omission or neglect of duty, endangers or causes to be endangei-ed the safety of any i)er,>!on conveyed or be- ing in oi" upon a railway, or aids orassists theroii;. (Codo, Art. 251.) IVeKliKoiitly caiiNiiiK; bo<lily injury to any por- Mon. — Kvory one is guilty of an indictable oHence and liable to two yeara' imprisonment who, by any unlawful act, or by doing negligently or omitting to do any act which it is his duty to do, causes grievous bodilj' injury to any other poi*son. (Code Art. 252.) Furious driving. — It is an indictable offence punishable by two years' imprisonment to do or cause any bodily harm to any person by racing, or other wilful misconduct or wilful neglect. (Code, Art. 253.) «;28 I'RACTIOAI, OriDE TO MAtllHTllATEH. li«>nviiiK «'x«*n%nlloiiM, iiiiiim«'4I iiiIik'm or qiiiir- rl«'N, or liolcM or o|i«'iiiiiKN In U'v, iiUKiiurdcd.— (H««(V«li«, Art. 256.) NollTll-WINT Mol NTBI) I'OLIOE, Tho ActH rolatiiig to tlio North-WoHt Mouiitt-d Police lorct> aro uinomk'd iind coiiMolidutt'd by tho Mounted Police Act, 18!t4 (57-fi8 Vic. c. 27)> MK*. IH of whiili t'liumoruloH a iiiinilior of otfoiicoM (iii- cludiiij^ intoxication, o|i|»n'ssioii, tyrannical condiict towardw an inferior, wearing any |iarty emblem, mutinous or iiiHuhordinate conduct, and dewurtion) for tho commiwHion of which a memhor of the force (not heing a comniis8ione<l otHcer) tnay he Hummarily convicted, Ix^fore the comnusMiinier, the asMistant cf)run\iMHi()ner or tho siiporintendent or other comminHioned ofHcor commanding at any poHt or in any dint rid, and jtuniHhed hy tino not oxceoding one month's pay, or by imi)riM(tnmeiU n(»t exceeding one year, with hard labor, or by Itoth fine and impriHoiiment, and, alno, if a non-conimisHionod otllccr, by reduction in rank, in addition in any case to any puniHhment to which the otfendor is liable with rospoct to Hucli otfenco, under any law in force in the North-West TorritorioH, or in the province in which the ollenco Ih committed. SectioTiH 21 and 22 provide for investigations in tho case of a commissioned otHcer being charged with any of tho otlbnces enu- merated in section 18, Section .^2 declares that the Act shall be in force in and apply to the district of Keewatin. Section 33 provides that tho Govornor-Cronoi'al-in-Council mi y, from time to time, enter into arrangements witli the Government of any Province for the use or employment of the force, or any portion thereof, in aiding tho administration of justice in such Province, and in carrying into etl'ect the laws of tlie Legislature thereof. Section 34 repeals the R. S. C, c. 45, and tho 52 Vic, c. 25. North-West Tekbitories. See the North-West Territories Act (R. S. C, c. 50) and its amend- ments, 50-51 Vic, c 28 ; 51 Vie , c. 19 ; 54-55 Vic, c. 22, and 57- 58 Vic, c. 17. NUIRANOIH. 610 NlH8AN(^K8. A voiiiiiioii iiiiIniiii(*4' Ih ail iinliiwt'iil iicl or timiNHioii to diKcliar^t' u logiil duty, whicli act or omiHHioii oiniaii^crH llio livoH, Hatoty, licaltli, property, (t comrort of'tlio puhlir, or liy wliicli Iho pulilic art! olmtrucUHl in llio (^\l)l•(•iHo or oiijoymont ol' any ri^ht common to all llcr Majohty'H HiiliJcctH. (Oodt-, Art. l!H.) A common or piihlic nuiHanc(>, iitidcr tlu* common law, is an in- jury or damago to ail porHonn who come within the Hphcro of itH operation, though it may ho ho iji a gnuittM' dcgrou to Homo than to othorH. (]) Kor oxample, if. in the operation of a manufactory — sucli aH a dyc-vv«»rUH, a tallow funuicu, a Hinclting hounc, a tan- ning factory, or a limo pit for cleaning HkinH — volumeH of rioxiouH Bmoku or poiHonous cfHuvia are emitted ; to pei-MOUH who are within the reach of thcHe operatioim, and whose health may he thereby 'endangered, a nuisance, in the popular sense of the term, is com- mitted. St), also, an obstruction in a highway is, to all who have occasion to travel upon it, a nuisance. It may bo a greater nuis- hnce to those who have to travel over it daily than it is to a person UH'iig it only once a year ; but it is more or lesH a nuisance toovory one who has occasion to use it, and it is, therefore, a common or pub- lic nuisance, (2) although not of so serious a character as a nuisance endangering life or health. Whore, however, the thing complained of is such as to be limited to one or oidy a few individuals, it is a private nuisance. It has boon said that in judging of a public nuisance, the public good it does might, in some ca.ses, whore the public healtli was not concerned, bo taken into consideration, in order to see if the public annoyance was outweighed by tho public benefit doinved ; (i{) but this doctrine was overruled in Ward's case, whore it was held to be no answer, to an indictment for a nuisance in a harbor by erecting (1) Soltau V. De Held, 2 Sim. N. S. 142 ; R. v. Meyers, 3 U. C. V. P. 333. (2) See Alt. (ien. v. Sheffield Gas Consumers' Co., 3 De G. M. and G 304 ; Imperial Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Broadbent, 7 H. L. Ca. ttOO; Crowder v. Tinkler, 19 Ves. «17: Reg. v. Train, 2 B. and S. 640; Bliss v. Hall, 4 Bing. N. C. 183. (3) R. v. Russell, 6 B. & C. 56ti. 630 PRACTICAL aUIDB TO MAGISTRATES. an embankment, that although the work was in Horae degree a hindrance to navigation, it was advantageous in a greater degree to the other uses of the port. (1) No length of time will legalize a nuisance. (2) Common iinlHaiiced which are criminal. —Every one is guilty of an indictable offentie and liable to one year's im- prisonment or a tine, who commits any common nuisance which endangers the lives, safety or health of the public, or which occasions injury to the pei*8on (5f any individual. (Code, Art. 192.) Common nuisanccM which are not criminal. — Any one convicted upon any indictment or information for any common nuisance other than those mentioned in Article 192, shall not be deemed to have committed an indictable oftence, but all such proceedings or Judgments may be taken and had, as hereto- fore, to abate or remedy the mischief done by such nuisance to the public right. (Code, Art. 193.) Article 19,2 deals disjunctively, but distinctly, with two different classes of common nuisance, namely, 1, a common nuisance which endangers the lives, safety or health of the public ; and, 2, a com- mon nuisance which, though not dangerous to life, etc., occasions injury to the person of any individual. Oaths. The Canada Eoidence Act, 1893 (56 Yic, c. 31), provides by sec- tion 26 that any judge, notary public, justice of the peace, police or stipendiary magistrate, recorder, mayor, or commissioner author- ized to take affidavits to be used in Provincial or Dominion Courts, or any other functionary authorized by law to administer an oath in any matter, may receive the solemn declaration of any person voluntarily making the same before him in attestation of any wi-iting, deed or instrument, or of the truth of any fact or of any (1) R. V. Morris, 1 B. & Ad. 441 ; R. v. Ward, 4 A. & E. .384; R. v. Ran- dall, C. & Mar. 496. (2) R. v. Cross, 3 Camp. 227 ; 8. v. Ranljin, 16 Am. R 737 ; 1 Bish. New Cr. L. Com. s. 1078a. OATHS. — OBSCINB MATTER. 631 account rendered in writing ; and that such declaration may bo in the following form : — I, A. B., do solemnly declare that [state the fact or facts declared to], and I make this solemn declaration, conwcientiously believing it tf be true, and knowing that it is of the same force and oft'oct as if made under oath and by virtue of The Canada Evidence Arf., 1893. Declared before me at this day I of A.D. 18 Administibing Unlawful Oaths. — See p. 435, ante. AoMINISTEBtNG OatHS WITHOUT AUTHORITY. — Seo p. 437, OH'e. As to the MoDKs of Administering the Oath to a witness, and as to Affirming instead of taking the oath, see pp. 203-219, ante. Oaths of Allegiance. See E. S. C, c. 112. For general form of Oath of Allegiance see p. 11, ante. See Allegiance, p. 444, ante. Obscene Matter. Selling obscene books or advertlsliiK obscene drugs, etc. — See Article 179 of the Code, at p. 547, ante. Posting Obscene or Immoral Books, Etc. — See Art. 180 of the Code. Obstruction of Public or Peace Officer. See Article 144 of the Code. Assaulting a public or peace officer. — See Aogua vated Assaults, p. 4(51, ante. Offensive Weapons. The expression '-offensive weapon" includes any gun or other firearm or air-gun, or any part thereof, or any sword, sword-blado. 632 PHAOTICAI, OUIDE TO MAQISTRATES. bayonet, piko, pike-houd, spour, upoav-hoad, dirk, dagger, knife or other inHtrument intended for cutting or HtuM)ing, or any nletal knuckles, or other deadly or dangerous Weapon and any instru- ment or thing intended to be used as a weapon, and all ammunition which may be used with or for any weapon. (Code, Art. 3r.) POSSKSISINU OR CARRVtNO ANY OFFENSIVE WEAPON FOR ANY PURPOSE DANGEROUS TO THE PuBLic Peaok, — is an indictable offence punishable by five years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 102.) Openly carryino Offensive Weapons so as to Create Alarm. — This is an offence punishable summarily by fine not exceeding $40 (not less than $10), and 30 days imprisonment in default of payment. Shuoolbrs carrying Offensive Weapons. — Eveiy oneis guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for ten years' who is found with any goods liable to seizure or forfeiture under any law, relating to inland revenue, the customs, trade or naviga- tion, and KNOWING them to be so liable, and carrying offensive weapons. (Code, Art. 104.) Carrying a Pistol or Air-Gun without Justification and without having a Certificate from a Justice of the Peace. — (See Code, Art. 105.) Selling Pistol or Air-Gun to a Minor under Sixteen ; or Sklling a Pistol or Air-(Iun without keeping a Rboord of si;oH Sale. — (See Code, Art. 106.) Having a Pistol or Air-Gun when Arrested for any Offence. — (See Code, Art. 107.) Having a Pistol ob Air-Gun with Intent to Injure Anyone. —(See Code, Art. 108.) Pointing a Firearm (loaded or unloaded) at Anyone — is an offence punishable summarilj- by a fine not exceeding $120. (Code, Art. 109.) Carrying Offensive Weapons. — It is an offence punishable summarily bj' a fine not exceeding $50 (not loss than $10), for any one to cany any bowie knife, dagger, dirk, metal knuckles, skull cracker, slung shot or other offensive weapon of a like character or to secretly carry any instrument loaded at the end, or for any OFFENSIVE WEAPONS. — PEDDLERS. 633 poi-son to soil or oxjioso for sale publicly or privately any Buch weajion, or to bo masked or disguised and carry or have in his possession any firearm or air-gun. (Code, Art. 110.) Cabrtino SiiBATit Knives. — (See Code, Art. 111.) Refuseno to DEMVEa AN Offensive Weapon when Demanded nr A Justice of the Peace. — (See Code, Art. 113.) As to the offences of cominq akmed near a public meeting, and lying in wait for persons returning from a public meeting, sec Articles 114 and 115 of the Code. As TO Sale of Arms in N. W. Territories, and Possessing Weapons near Public Works, see Articles 116 and 117 of the Code. Ontario Factories Act. See E. S. O., c. 208, and 52 Vic, c. 43, (Out.) (JuEBEc Factories Act. See E. S. Q., Articles 3019 to 3053, 52 Vic. c. 32, and 56 Vic, c 28. Patents. See the Patent Act E. S. C, c 64, and its amendments, 51 Vic, c 18, 63 Vic, c. 13, 54-55 Vic. c 33, 55-56 Vic, c 24 and 56 V'c, c 34. Pawnbrokers. See E. S. C, c 128 ; E. S. 0., c 155, and E. S. Q., Articles 954 to 992. A person who engages in a single act of receiving or taking a pawn or pledge, cannot be thereby considered a pawnbi'oker. (1) Peddlers. Every peddler travelling from house to house and from town to town in the province of Quebec, to sell or expose for sale any goods and merchandise, (except those mentioned below), without being the holder of a jieddler's license is liable to a fine of $40 for each (I) R. v. Andrews, 25 U. C. Q. B. 196. 684 PRACVICAL GUIDE TO MAQISTRATES. article which ho sells, barters or delivers under any title whatever. (1) It is however expressly provided that the law as to peddler's licenses shall not apply to persons employed by a temperance society, or by a benevolent or religious society, to peddle and sell temperance tracts and other moral and religious publications under the direction of svich society ; that no person is 'obliged to take out a license to peddle and sell any of the following articles, namely : — Acts of the Legislature ; prayer books an catecnisms ! proclama- tions, gaz ^ttes, almanacs or other documents printed by authority; fish, fruit and vituals or any goods, wares and manufactures when they are peddled and sold by the actual maker or worker, ho being a British subject and a resident of the province, or by his children, apprentices, agents or servants, excepting always, drugs, medicines and patent remedies) ; and that a peddler's license shall not be required from any of the following pereons, namely : — Tinkers, coopers, glaziers, harness repairoi-s or other persons in order to go on the highway to carry on their trade of repairing kettles, casks, household furniture and utensils ; nor from hucksters or persons having stalls or stands on markets in cities or towns for the sale of fish, fruit or vituals, or goods, wares and racrchandiso in such stalls or stands, on their complying with the police regulations of the locality. (2) It has been held that a person, who has a store and travels through the adjoining country soliciting orders which he after- wards tills, is not a peddler within the meaning of a Pcunsylvania law prohibiting " sales, without a license, by a hawker or peddler or travelling merchant. (3) It has also been held in Illinois, that under a statute which au- thorizes city councils to license, regulate and prohibit hawkers and peddlers, a city has no authority to require book canvassers, who solicit subscriptions for books for future delivery, to obtain licenses, since such canvassers are neither hawkers nor peddlei"s. (4) Where manufacturers of household goods of West Virginia sent their agent into North Carolina to sell goods by sample on the^ (1) R. S. Q., Art 993. (2) R. S. Q., Art. 870. (3) Com. v. Eichenberg, 21 Atl. Rep. 258; 13 Cr. L. .Mag. 647. (4) Emmons v City of I^wiston, 24 N. E. Rep. 58; 12 Cr. L. Mag. 865. TEDDIiERS. — I'EK.II HV. 635 iiistalmont i)liin, tho goods to hv dolivevcd to purcluiriiTH by tlio agont uftorwiirds, tho I'uot that tho goods woro to bo dolivorod by the agoiit, was licld not to make liim liable to pay a tax as a peddler under the laws of North Carolina. (1) A person wiio delivered goods i)reviously sold by another person was held not to be a peddler under a State ordinance which pro- vided that any person who should sell, or oltbr for sale, barter or exchange any goods or other articles of value in any street or alley or other ])ublie place or in wagons or other vehicles or at private or public houses should be deemed a peddler. (2) The council of any county, city or town in Ontario is empowered to pass by-laws for licensing hawkers, etc. ; and the word " hawker " under the law of that province includes all persons who being agents for persons not resident within the county, sell or offer for sale tea, drj'' goods, watches, plated-ware, silverware or jewellery, or carry and expose samjiles or patterns of any s\ich goods, to be afterwards delivered within tho countj', to an}'^ person not being a wholesale or retail dealer in such goods, wares or merchaiulise. (3) It has been held thai tho Ontario law does I'ot meet the case of a principal, although it applies to agents. So that where the defen- dant, a wholesale and retail dealer in teas, went out of the county where he resided into another county where he sold teas by sample to private persons, to whom after taking their orders he subse- quently ilelivered the teas which were sent in one parcel to tho county where the buyers resided iind there distributed, it was held that a conviction of the defendant for carrying on a petty trade could not be sustained ; for the defendant was not carrying goods for sale, and, as the defendant could not be classed as a hawker within the meaning of the Act, ho was not liable for ottering goods for sale by sample. (4) Perjury. Definition ol* perjury and Miliornatioii of* per- jury. — Perjury is an assertion as to a matter of fact, oi^inion, (1) In re Spain, U. S. C. C. (N. Car.), 47 Fed. Rep. 208 ; 1 Men. L. Dig. 36. (2) City of Stewart v. Cunningham, Iowa, 55 N. \V. Rep. 311 ; Men. L. Dig. 502. (3) 55 Vic, c. 42 (Ont.) sec 495. (4) R. v. Henderson, 18 Ont. R. 144. 41 636 PRACTICAL (UHl)E To MA0IHTRATE8. luiliofor Uiiowlodji^o, minlo l)y ii witnoHH in a judiiMul procooding as part ot hin cvidoiuio, u])()n oath or aftiriuation, wliothor Huch ovidoiK'Ci In givcui in open court, or by affidavit or otiiorwiso, and whether such evidence is material or no<, isuch aHHortion iuMn^ known to such witnosH to l)o talso, and ln'ing intended by iiini to niisload the court, Jury or porson holding the procciMJing. Evidence intliiK section includes ovidenco given on the voir dire and evidence given before u grand jury. 2. Kvery person Ih a witness within the meaning of this section who actually gives his evidence, whether he wus competent to be a witness or not, and whether his evidence was adnmsible or not. 3. Every proceeding is judicial within the meaning of this section which is held in or under the authority of any court of justice, or before a grand jury, or before either the Senate or House of Com- mons of Canada, or an}' committee of either the Senate or House of Commons, or before any Legislative Council, Legislative Assem- bly or House of Assembly, or any committee thereof, empowered by law to administer an oath, or bcfori' any justice of the ])eace. or any arbitrali>r or umpire, or any person or body of persons autho- rised by law or by any statute in force for the time being, to make an inquiry and take evidence therein ujion oath, or before any legal tribunal by which any legal right or liability can be estab- lished, or before anj- person acting as a court, justice or tribunal, having power to hold such judicial proceeding, whether duly con- stituted or not, and whether the proceeding was duly instituted or not before such court or ])erson, so as to authorise it or him to hold the proceeding, and although such proceedimj was held in a wrong place or was otherwise invalid. 4. Subornation of perjury is counselling or procuring a person to commit any perjury which is actually committed, (Code, Art, 145.) 1*1111 iNllilK'tllt. — Every one is guilt}' of an indictable otfence and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment who commits verjury or snnoRNATioN of perjury. 2. If the crime is committed in order to j)ro('ure the conviction of a person for any crime punishable by death, or im|)risonment for seven years' or more, the punishment may be imprisonment for life. ',\,-> V I,. ..J I'ER.IUllV. — I'KUSONATION. (537 ■7. Any jiuliifd of any Cmirl of [{I'conl, or aiij' conunisHioMur lioforo wliom any ciKjuiry or (rial is held, and which hoisliy hiw rofjuirod or authorized lo lioid, may diri'id tho prosocution ol'any jKn'son i who appears to him to have hoon guilty of pcM'jiiry in any ovidonco ;<* givon, or in any at1i(hivi(, alllrmation, dci laration, deposition, ox- araination or othor proceeding made or taken l)efore iiim. (I{. S. C, c. 154, HOC. 4.) FiiInc OatllN. — Kvery one is guilty of an indielahle ollenco and lial)lti to seven years' imprisoiinient, who, being required or authorized by law to make any statement on oath, alllrmation or solemn declaration, thereupon makes a statement which would amount to ]>crjury if made in a JiidiiMal proceeding, (('ode, Art. 147.) " As to other false oaths, see Articles 148 and 14it. k^<' VnlHV MlatciiK'iitN. — I'lvery one is guilty of an indictable otVence and liable to two years' imprisonment who, up )n any occa- sion on which lie is |)ermittod by law to make any statement or declaration before any otflcer authorised by law to permit it to bo made before him, or before any notary j)ub]ic to be certified by him as such notary, makes a statement which would amount to ]>orjury if made on oath in a judicial proceeding. (Code, Art. 150.) *' ' I'EllSONATION. PorNoiiniioii with iiitont to ohtiiiii any pro- perty. — Kvery one is guilty- of an indictable ott'ence, and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment, who, with intent fraudulently to obtain any property, personates any person, living or dead, or ad- ministrator, wife, widow, next of kin or relation of any person. (Code, Art. 45(i.) Personation at exaininationiii. — Ever}' one is guilty of an indictable oU'encc, and liable on indictment or summary con- viction to one year's imprisonment, or to a tine of one hundred dol- lai's, who falsely, with intent to gain some advantage for himself or some other person, personates a candidate at any eompt^titive or qualifying examination, held under the authority of any law or statute or in connection with any university or college, or who (i'iiS PRACTICAL UUIDE TO MAUISTIIATES. pvocuri'H ItimMcU'or any otiu r ikh'mou Io be porHdimlo*! at any Huch oxaminiition, or who knowiii^^ly availn liiinscit' ol' tlio rcKultH of such pcrHoiitttioii, (C'odo, Art. 457.) P<>rNoiinllon of oi»'ii«>rw of* Nliiir<>N or «1IvI4I«>ii<1n, vto., ill 44ov«>riiiii<'iit or other MtockN. — TImh is un in- dictablo ort'ont'o puniHhahlo by I'ourtooii ycurn' iinpriHoniuoiit. (Codo, Art. 458.) Arkiiowl«MlKiiiK <*■■>' iiiMtriiiiieiit In a FulNe liailli'. — Kvory oiio is guilty of un indietablo otlVnco and liablo to seven years' imiiriHonmcnt who, without hiwful authority or excuse (the proof of whidi shall lie on liini) acknowledges, in tiio name of any other ])erson. before any court. Judge or other person, lawfully autliori/ed in that l>eluilf, any recogni'/ance of bail, or any cognovit actionem, or consent for judgnu'iil, or judgment, or any deed or instrument. (Code, Art. 459.) As to false personation of voters at parliamentary elections, see the Dominion Ekctiom Act, 11. S. C, c. 8, ss. 81), DO, and It)^. It luis been held that in an indictment for the offence of ]»erson- ating a voter, there should be an averment negativing the inden- tiiy of the defendant with the voter alleged to have been person- ated. (1) I'ETROLEUM. See Inspection of Petroleum, p. 579, ante, PlLOTAQE. See the Pilotage Act, 11. S. C. c. 80, (amended by 56-56 Vic. c. 20 Sec. 19 of the Montreal Harbor Commissioners Act, 1894, (57-68- Vic. c. 48), provides that the Harbor Commissioners of Montreal* shall have for the purposes of that Act, jurisdiction within the limits of the port of Montreal, and that under the Pilotage Act that corporation is the pilotage authority of the pilotage district of Monti-eal. (1) R, v, Hojg, 25 U. C. Q. B,, 68. I'lUAOY. — POISON. (53!) I'lKACY. llcfiiililoil. — Tlio usual dotinilioi) of piracy, in KiigliNh lau', is ^' rohlnri/ at sea." Hut robbi'iy at sea, in order to couMtituto piracy must bo without authority tVom any princo or wtuto. II' a jiarty inaiving a capture at Hca do so liy tlio autliority of any princo or stato it cannot he coiisidoivd piracy ; for a luition can never ho doomed pirates, Kixod domain, pul)li(j rovonuo and a certain form of govornmont oxompt a |)ooplt) from tluit charaotei'. (1) l*ira«*y hy fliv law ol'iiatioiiN. — Kvovy Oiio is guilty of an iii(iictai)le otionco who does any act wliich amounts to piracy by tho law of nations, and is liable to tho following punishment : — (a.) To death, if in committing or attempting to commit such crime, the otlendtn- murders, attempts to murder or wounds any person, or does any act by which tlie life of any pci'son is likely to bo ondangered ; (b.) To imprisonment for life in all other cases. (Codo, Art. 127.) .;-.-.. , : ■ , , ,-- ^ ,. —^ , . ;■ As to other piratical acts, seo Articles 128 and 12!) of tho Codo. ; Xnt liglitiiiy; pIratvN.— (See Code, Art. 130.) POISON. It is enacted by Article 4035 of the E. S. Q., that no person, — unless ho be a physician inscribed as a member of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of tho province of Quebec, or be register- ed in accordance with the provisions of the law as to " licentiate OF PHARMACY," — shall keep open a shop for the retailing dispensing or compounding of drugs or of certain poisons in schedule A nor sell or attempt to sell any drug or poison or medicinal preparation containing any of such poisons, nor engage in the dispensing of proscriptions, nor use or assume the title of chemist and druggist, or chemist or druggist or apothecary or pharmacist or pharmaceu- tist or dispensing or pharmaceutical chemist or any other title bearing a similar interpretation within the pi'ovince. By Article (1) Grot 2,0.18,8.2. (MO I'RAOTIOAI, OIIIKE Tt> MA(JIHTHATKH. 404ti, till' |)uiiulty for any inrrin^ciiu-iit ol' llit- law '\» $20 for tin* Hi'Mt oH'oneo mid 8f>0 for citcli HtiliHt>(|Ufnt otrcncc ami cdstN, Arti- (.'!(' 4084 itrt'scrilicH corlain imiU'm to Im» oltwm-vt'd in connt'ciion with tin' Mcliin^ c>f poiHonn liy iifrsmis liavin^ tin- rii^lit to sell (licni. And iindiT ArlicUi 40;{1>, tin- sfllin/jj >>{' ccrtaiii urliilc^ including putont miMlii'inoH Im oxonipti'd from tin' o|u'rutioii n\' ilii> aliovc pro- viHJonM. it lias lu'cn held niidcr tin' Kn^llHli Pharmacy Art. jKfiH, that a poTHon, not lioinf; a lu'i^islcrt'il clu'inist, who hcIIs an ai'ticlc contain- ing u conMidorahUf amount though not consisting solely of \\w poi- Hons nu'iitioncil in the sclu'(lido to the Act, is su'ijccl |o the piii\alty ijn))osed liy section 1') of the Act, that the exemption of pattMil medicines in section KJ from the penalty "idy applies to medicines protected by letters patent, that ehlorodyne was a poison, on account of itH containing scheduled poisons, notably iddorofoi'm and prepn- vations of opium ; that it was not a |>atenl meilicine allhongh ho called, and that therefore it did not come within the exception in section 1(1, in favor of patent medicineH, and that sales thereof must ho conducted in accordance with the regulations to he ohsorved undor section 17 of the Act, in relation to sah's of poisons. (!) Where a defendant was sued for a penalty for keeping open a shop for the retailing, <lisj)ensing or compounding of poisons, — to wit, a jireparation of morphine called liicoitAciNK. contrary to the provisions of the Knglish Pharmacol Act, and where the analyst called on liehalf of the |)laintiH, stated that the actual (|uantity i)f morphine in a bottle of the preparation might have been from one- fiftieth to three tiftieths of a graiii ]ier ounce, and he was not prepared to say whether the taking of the whole contents of the bottle would do an adult an}- harm, it was held that the evidence as to the quantit}' of mor|)hine in the mixture was not sutHcient to entitle the plaintitl'to recover the penalty, and that the prohibi- tion in the Act does not apply to u mixture containing an in- finitesimal quantity of poison. (2) The prohibition against the sale of poisons by un(jualiticd per- sons has been hold in England to extend to tho sale of jiroprietory (1) Pharmaceutical Society v. Piper, 5 R. (1893), 296 ; 62 L. J. Q. B., 305. (2) Pliarmaceutical Society v. I^lve, 10 R. {Rh. 1894), 225. POIHON.— POl.VdAMV. (!4I m(Mli('int<H coiiiainiii^ niii' of Hu< ncIhhIuIoiI imiNoiiH um uti in^rt'tlicnl in Niicli a i|iiiiiilily iiM Id lie hiu-lt'iil to man or rliild, ami lliat llio uxi'inption in lavor of |iutfnt mt'tlicini's In rcslricttMl to nuMlirincN which an< protocU'il hy ii'tliTH patent nmUtr tlm gnuit mouI, and (loi'H not apply to proprietory moilirlnim. (I) Attempt to MURUKa i«y admim8Tk.iiiN(i I'oihon. Sod p. 5(!(!, ante. AliMINISTI'ltINO l>OIH()N AND TIIIIKKMV OAI HINU OANltKH TO LIKE, KTC. S«M« p. 4.'14, ante. I'OIiYUAMV. ■•olyjjHiiiy . — I'lvcry one is guilty of an indictal)!!' oMonco and liaiilc to impi-isonmunt for live yeurn, and to u lino of livo hundred dollars, who — (a.) prueticoH, or, hy the riles, eereimndes, forms, ridos or ens- tonis of any donoiniiuition, sect or society, religious or Heenlur, or by any form <d' eontract, oi- \)y mere mutual consent, or liy any other meliiod wluitsot^ver, and wlietliei' in a nuinner recognizt'il hy law as a hiuding form of nuirriago or not, ugrecH or consents to pvuctiso or enter into (i.) any form of polyiramy; (ii.) uny kiiul of conjugal union with more than one person at the same time ; (iii.) what among the [lersons commonly called .Mormons is known a8 spiritual or plural nuvrriago ; (iv.) lives, colnihits, or agrees or consents to live or cohabit, in any kind of conjugal uiuon with u person wht) is nuirried to another, oi' with u person who lives or cohabits with another or others in any kind of conjugal uruon ; ni- (6,) celebrates, is ii party to, or assists in any sucit rito or core- mony which purports to make binding or to sanction any of tho sexual rolationships mentioned in paragraph (a) of this Hoction ; or (c.) procures, enforces, enables, is a pai-ty 1o, or assists in tlio comi)liance witli, or carrying out of, any such form, rule or ctis- tom which so purports; or (d.) ]M'ocures, enforces, enables, is a pai-ty to, or assists in the execution of, any such form of contract which so purports, or tho giving of any such consent which so purports. (Code, Art. 278.) (1) PhHrmaceutieal Society v. Armson, 9 R. (Sept. 1894), 241. 641 I'HAoricAL iiiiiDi r<i maoimthatih. Moi't< coliiiliitatioii hi>t\vi'i>n u iiiiirricil man ami anotluT inaii'H wil'o Ih iioI HiilMrii'iil In ><iiMliiiM a riiiivirlioii iitnlcr iImm article, luit, titu law hoitiK iiiiucil at llm rrprcNMion nf MnnitoiiiHiii, tlu*ro inttNt bo, hotwt't'ii tli(< |iurti<'H. Hnriu' cuiitract or ronjii^al iiiiinii, ku|)|i<)h(>i| to III' liiiKliii^r ii|iiiii Ihi'in. ami whirli the law wan ihtfiii|<'i| to pi-oliiliil. (1) I'UHT OKKM'K. St'«' llic I'ost Office Act l{ S. (\ v, ;J5, and itn ainiMnlnifntH, BU Vio. ('. L'O and r>7-fiH Vic. c. B4. Swtion !t3 of llic I'ust Ojfii'i' Art (as aniomlcd l>y fiT-SH Vice. 51, sec. 2) «'naclM llial every one w lio encloMcs a letter or leltevH, or writing intended to nerve tlie |iur|MiHe of a letter or post card, in a ]>ar('el poHttxl lor tlie paicel poNt.— (M' in a patliet (d' samples or jtatttTMH posterl to pass at tlio rate of posta^o applicalilu to samploH and pattei'ns, or incloses a letter or post card, or any writini; to servo the pnrpose of a letter or po-*t card, oi* incloses any other thin^, in a newspaper posted to pass as a nttwspaper at the rale of ]»osta^e applicahle to newspapi-rs Texet'pt in (ho case of the accouids and receipts of newspaper pidilishers an<l of the pi'intecl circulars invitint; snliscriplions and the printed envelopes ad- droNHod to sm h pulilishers, whicli will he porniitted to pass tbidod or inchtsed within the newspapers sent hy them to their suhscrih- ors), — ()!• inclosi^s a letter oi' any writing intended to serve tlio ])iirposo of a letter or post card, in any mail matter sent hy post not boiiig a lottor, shall incur a penalty not exceeding forty dollars and not loss than ton dollars In i«aidi oaso. StKAMNU post OFKIOK LKTTKKS, post l.ETTKIl HAOS AND OTHKR MAIL MATTEll. — See Articles :52(!-;{2H of the Code. Undor Hoction 8{( of tho U. S. C. v. 35, it is a misdomoanor pun- ishablo under Art. 051 of tho ('ode. for any one to uidawfully open or wilfully koop or sooroto any post hitter bag 6r post lottor or to nogloet or refuse to deliver up any post letter to the jjorson en- titled to it. I'KI/E FIUHTINO. Dt^fiiiltiom. — The exproHsion 'prize tight*' moans an en- counter or tight with tiHts or handH, between two i^ersons who have (1) R. V. Labrie, M. L, R., 7 Q. B. 211. I>HI/B noilTINO— KAtl.WAYN. 61.1 liit'l for Hiicli |>iif|i(mit Ity proviitiiH ai'ruii>(fiu>*iil iimili' liy <>i- {\,r tlioiu. {.CiuU', An '.»2.) Pliiilnliiiinil. -l<iVi>rv <n\o in guilty <>t' nii (ttli<ii"(' iiml liulilo, Oh Niimiuiii'v I'oiiviclioii, to a pt'iially not o^:(•l'o^iill^ !8l,(MM>, ami not It'MHtlian 6I0II, or to ini|ii'iHoiitii<'iit lor ti term not oxci't'ilin^ nix liioiitliH, witli or without liani lalior, or to liolli, who noikIn or arct'ptH u chaMcii^i" to a pri/o tlj^lil, or who traiiiH lor a pri/,t> ti^ht or ai'lN as traiiii»r or h k-oihI to miicIi a porwon. (Code, Art. It.'l.) Till* principalK in a pri/.u tl^lit an* piiniMhahlo Nuniniarily hy twolvo months' inipriNoninont ; (Codo, Art. !>4.) and cvory porHon ItroHont at a prizo ti^ht as an aid, Norond, Hur^i'on, nnipiro, i)a('Ut>r, asniMtant or rt'porli'r is sninniarily pnnishahh' in a penalty of 8.*)IM( or inipriHi>nnii'nl lor twelve montliK, or Imth. (Codn, Art. !•.').) Canadians Icavini^ Canada to cn^ngo in a pri/.o tight i)oyon(l thu limits tlnMvol' arc liahlc to a pcintlty ol'SlDU or six n.onths' impri- sonmt'iit, or lioth, (('ode. Art. !»tJ.) As to dnty of shcritl's, polices olllccrs, conHtalilcs and other poaco otiicei's to ari'csl pi-rsons lielicvcd to lu> about ttt en/^age in any prizo light within (^mada, and to tbrcihly provont prizo Hglits, boo Jl. S. C. c. 16:J, soch. 11, 7 ami lit. Sm« Akkhav. p. 44tl. ante. I'ROCURINO PIlOHTITtiTION. So« Pkkii.ement ok Females, \k 51(1, mte. KAII.WAV8. Soo tho liailuay Aci^ (.51 Vie. o. 2!)) ami its aniondments, 63 Vio. 0. 28, 55-50 Vie. e. 27, 5(5 Vie. c. 27, and 57-58 Vie. c. 5;{. As to CKrMINAI- HBEACII ok contract by a railway OOMl'ANY, see Contract, p. 5l>8, dnte. €on¥eyuii<>«> of Cattle by Kail.— (Soo p. 518, ante.) Falne Railway TIckvtN.— It is an indictablo ottonco punishabio by G months imprisonment to fraudulently obtain a passage on any carriage, tramway, railway, steamer or other vessel by moans of a false ticket or order. (Code, Art. 362.) Forgery of Railway Tickets.— The forgery of any ticket for a free or j)aid passage on any carriage, tramway, railway 644 PRAOTICAI, GUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. or steamer or other veHsol is puiiiahublo by seven years' imprison- ment. (Code, Art. 423 o. m.) OaniblliiK in Itailwaji' C/Urm. — (Sco p. 552, ante.) MisciUEP ON llAiiiWAVs. — Soo pp. C19-(»2l, ante. Stealing on RAii.WArs. — See Code, Art. 313. JitcaliiiK; Uailttay or i>it;eaiiil>oat TioketM.— The stealing of any railway, tramway or steamboat ticket or order, is indictable and punishable by two years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 330.) Eape. Defiiiltioii. — Kapo is the act of a man having carnal know- ledge of a woman, who is not his wife, without her con.sent, or with consent which has been extorted by threats or fear of bodily harm, or obtained by personating the woman's husband, or by false and fraudulent representations as to the nature and quality of the act. 2. No one under the age of fourteen years can commit this offence. (Code, Art. 2(J6.) Carnal knowledge is complete upon peiietration to any, even the slightest degree, and oven without the emission of seed. (Code, Art. 3cl.) PlinlNhineiit. — Every one who commits rape is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to suffer death, or to imprisonment for life. (Code, Art. 267.) A boy under the age of fourteen years is by law presumed to be incapable of committing a rape. (1) A husband, too, is legally incapable of committing a rape upon his wife ; but a husband may be punished for aiding in the com- mission of a rape upon his wife, (2) and so may a boy under four- teen be punished for aiding in the commission of the offence. (3) (1) 1 Hale 631 ; R. v. Groombridge, 7 C & P. 582 ; R. v. Philips, 8 C. & P- 736. (2) R. V. Audley, 1 St, Tr. 393. (3) 1 Hale 620, 639; R. v. Eldershaw, 3 C. & P. 396 ; R. v. Allen, 1 Den. 864- RAPE. 645 A man who got into bod to a woman while she was asleep and know she was asleep, and had connection with her while in that state, was held guilty of rape. (1) Whore a medical man, by pretending to be treating, medically, a young girl under fourteen, had connection with her, she being led to believe that it was part of the treatment, the prisoner was held to be guilty of an indecent assault. (2) It would now be a rape, and it was so held to be, in a later case, where the prosecutrix, a girl of nineteen, had consulted the prisoner as to her illness, and he, under pretence of i)erforniing a surgical operation, had connection with her, she submitting under the belief I hat he was merely performing the surgical operation. (3) The defendant may adduce evidence to show that the woman is of notoriously bad character, unchaste, and of indecent habits, or that she is a common prostitute ; or to show that she has pre- viously had carnal connection with himself of her own free will ; (4) but he cannot adduce evidence of other particular acts with other jiersons, so as to impeach her chastity. (5) If asked on cross examination whether, outside of the prisoner, she has had carnal connection with other men, named to her in the questions, and if she deny having had any such intercourse with them, her answer will be conclusive and those men cannot be called to contradict her. (()) A man who gave a girl of thirteen, a quantity of intoxicating liquor ^o excite her, and, on her becoming drunk, violated her, while insensible to what he did, was held to have committed a rape. (7) Attempt to coiiiinit rape. — Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to seven years' imprisonment who attempts to commit rape. (Code, Art. 268.) (1) R. V Mayers, 12 Cox, 311. (2) R. v. Case, 1 Den. 580 ; 19 L. J. (M.C.) 174. (3) R. v. Flattery, 2 Q. B. D. 410; 46 L. J. (M.C.) 130. (4) R. V. Riley, 18 Q. B. D. 481 ; 56 L. J. (M.C.) 52. (5) R. v. Hod>!8on, R. & R. 211 ; R. v. Martin, 6 C. & P. 582. (6) R. v. Holmes, L. R., 1 C. C. 334; 41 L. J. (M.C.) 12; R. v. Hodgson, R. & K., ill. (7) R. V. Camplin, 1 Den. C. C. 89. G46 I'llACTICAFi OlIIDE TO MAOIHTHATES. ]>oflliii|( KirlN iiiid«'r f*oiirt<'oii. — Evcvy ono is guilty of ail indictiiiilK otl'ouco iiiul liiiblo to imprisomuoiit for lifif, iiml to bo whipped, who curniilly knows iiny girl under the age )f four- toon years, not being his wife, whether ho believes her to bo of or above that ago or not. (Code, Art. 2G!).) An attempt to have carnal knowledge of any girl under fourteen is punishable Uy two years imprisonment and whipping. (Code, An. 270.) A4liiiini.«(t('riii|{^(lrii|rM in or4l«'r to defile t'eiiialem. — (See p. 4iV6, ante.) C'ariiall;;^' liiiowiii}^; loiiiule idiotN or iliiiiiiiiieM. — (See p. 518, ante.) KECEIVtNG. ' ll4H*eivlii}r Property Olitaiuetl by any liitllct- able Olteiiee — Everyone is guilty of an indictable ort'cnce, and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment, who receives or retains in his possession anything obtained by any offence punishable on indictment, or by any acts wheresoever committed, which, if committed in Canada after the commencement of this Act, would have con- stituted an offence punishable upon indictment, knowing such thing to have been so obtained. (Code, Art. 314.) Keeeiviiig Ntoleu Post I^etter or PoNt-Ijettcr bag. — Every one is guilty of an indictable ort'ence and liable to tivo years' imprisonment who receives or retains in his possession, any post-letter, post-letter bag, or any chattel, money or valuable security, parcel or other thing, the stealing whereof is hereby declared to be an indictable ott'ence, knowing the same to have boon stolen. (Code, Art. 315.) Kccel%'iiig Property Obtained by Offence Pun- ishable fSnniiuarily. — Every one who receives or retains in his possession anj'thing, knowing the same to be unlawfully obtained, the stealing of which is punishable, on summary convic- tion, either for every oft'ence, or for the first and second offence only, is guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, for every first, second or subsequent offence of receiving, to the same RECEIVING. 647 punislimont, us if ho wore guilty of a first, second or subsoquont otlbnco of stealing the same. (Code, Art. 310.) When KeceiviiiK Im Coin|»1<'te. — The act of receiving anything unlawfully obtained is com|)kto as soon as the offender has either exclusivkly or jointly with the tuiep or any other person, possession of or control over such thing, or aids in conceal- ing or disposing of it. (Code, Art. 317.) As long as the exclusive possession of the goods still remains with the thief or other principal offender, the alleged receiver can- not be legally convicted of receiving. (1,) "Where a defendant, who receives the goods has merely rendered some aid in carrying them off, just after being stolen, ho may still be convicted of receiving ; as where A. and B. broke into a ware- house and stole thereout a quantity of butter, which they carried along the street thirty yards, and then fetched C. who, being apprised of the robbery, assisted in carrying the property away. (2) A receiver of stolen property may be prosecuted whether the principal ottendcr or thief has or has not been prosecuted or con- vit.!toil ; and any number of receivers of different parts of property stolen, may be tried together. (Code, Art. 627) If a husband, knowing that his wife has stolen goods, receives them from her, ho may be convicted of receiving. (3) Eecent po.ssession of stolen property is evidence cither that the person in possession stole it, or that he received it knowing it to bo stolen, according to the circumstances of the particular case. (4) The confession of the thief (unless made in the presence of and assented to by the alleged receiver) is not evidence against the person charged with the receiving. (5) To show guilty knowledge, other instances of receiving goods belonging to the prosecutor, from the same j)erson, may be proved ; (1) H. V. Wiley, 20 L. .T. M. C, 4. (2) R, V. Kins?. R. & K. 332 ; R. v. Atwell, '2 Fast P. C. 768. (3) R. V. McAthey, 32 L. J. M. C. 35. (4) R. V. LanKmead, L. & C. 427. R. v. McMahon, 13 Cox, (C. C R. Irish,) 275. (5) B. V. Cox, 1 F. & F. 99. 648 PaAOTIOAL GUIDE TO MAGISTUATES. (I) oven though thoy bo tho subjoct of other indictments and ante- cedent to the receiving in question. (2) In proceedings against a person for receiving or for liaving possession of goods icnowing tiiem to bo stolon ovidonco may, in order to sliow guilty knowledge, be given of his having been fotmd in possossion of other property stolen within the preceiling twelvemonths. (Code. Art. 7 Ki.) It will not be sufficient however merely to prove that other pro- perty stolen within the preceding twelve .months ha^, at S'>wie /'me during the twelve months, been dealt with by the j)ris()ner, but it must be proved that such other proj)er»y was found in tho pri-sonor's j»os8ession at tho time when ho was found in possession of the pro- perty forming the subjoct matter of the indictment, on which he is being tried. Qi) Therefore, where, to show guilty knowledge, evidence was tendered to prove that, a short time proviously, the prisoner had sold tor half its value, and had otherwise dis|)osed of, other ])roperty stolen within tho proceding twelve months, it was held that such evidence was inadmissible. (4) In proceedings taken against a person charged with receiving or possessing stolen goods, evidence of his having been previously eon- victed, W(//K/i_^«e (/mrs/^rts/, of any ortonco involving frauil or dis- honesty may bo given, so as to show that he knew the goods in question to be stolen. (Code, Art. 717.) * KecviviiiK after rcMtoratioii to owner.— When the thing unlawfully obtained has been restored to the owner, or when a legal title to the thing so obtained has been acquired by any person, a subsequent receiving thereof shall not be an ouonce although the receiver may know that the thing bad previously been dishonestly obtained. (Code, Art. 318.) A., after stealing some goods, .sent them (by rail) in a parcel addressed to B. ; C., an officer of the railway company, from infor- mation received, examined the parcel at the place of destination, (1) K. V. Dunn, 1 Moo, C. C. 146- (2) K. v. Davis.GC. & P. 177. (3) R. V. Carter, 53 L. J. M. C. 96. (4) R. V. Drage, 14 Cox, 85. RECOGNIZANCES. — RESTITUTION. — ROBBERY. 64!» and stopped its delivery. It was called for by A., the thief, on the day of its arrival, and refused to him. Next day, a porter, by O.'s direction, took the p;ircoI to a house whieli A. had designated ; and it was there received by B. Held, that B. could not be convicted of receiving, as the goods had ceased to be stolen goods when re- ceived by him from the porter sent by C. to deliver them. (1) Hboounizances. See pp. 409-418, ante. llESTITUTION AND COMPENSATION. Compensation for loss ok property — Article 836 of the Code, provides that a court, on the trial of any person on an indict- ment, may upon the api)lication of any person aggrieved and immediately after the conviction of the offender award any sura of money, not exceeding SlOOO, as compensation for any loss of pro- perty suffered by the applicant by means of the offence of which such offender in convicted ; and that the amount awarded for such compensation shall be deemed a judgment debt duo to the ])erson entitled to receive the same from the person so convicted, and that the order for ])a3'ment of such amount may be enforced in the same manner as in the case of any costs ordei-ed by the court to be paid under Article 8iJ2 of the Code, (p. 2G!>, ante). Compensation to bo.va-fide purchaser op stolen proi>euty — (See p. 271, anie). Restitution op stolen property — (See pp. 271-27 J, 270 and 305, ante.) EioTs. See p. 483, ante. ROBHEKY. Definition. — Robbery is theft accompanied with violence or threats of violence, to any person or property, used to extort the property stolen, or to prevent oi- ovei-come resistance to its being done. (Code, Art. 3!)7). (1) R. v. Schmidt, 35 L. J. M. C. 59; R. v. Villensky (1S92), 2 Q. B. 597. Q(K^ PRAOTICAI- (HIIDE Ttt MAGISTHATKS. PliiiiNliiiK'iit ol* Kol>l»«'ry with l'lol«'ii(>4S— Kvoiy ono irt guilty of an iiidicrlabli' oH'onoo and lialilo to iinpriHoiimont for lifo and to bo vvliipju'd, who — (a) rol)8 any ])or«oii, and at tho time of, or iniinodiatoly bofori!, or immediately after such robbory, wounds, beatu, Mtriken, or uses personal violence to such person ; or (6) being together with any other person or poi'sons, robs, or assaults with intent to rob, any person ; or (c) being armed with an otlensive weapon or instrument, robs, or assaults with intent to rob, any person. (Code, Art. 398.) PiiiiImIiiii«'1i( ol'RoblM'ry. — Every one who commits rob- bery is guilty of an indictable otlonce and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 399.) AMNllllIt with intent to Kob. — Kvery one who assaults any person with inteni to rob him, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to three years' imprisonment. (Code, Art. 400.) The ditferenco between robbery and stealing from the person is that tho former is open and violent, while the latter is generally done clandestinely. In robbery, force is a necessary ingredient ; in simple stealing from tho person it is not. For instance, merely snatching ])ro))orty from a person umiwares, and running otf with it, is not robbery. No such sudden taking or snatching is sutticient to constitute robbery, unless at tho same time some in^ i y be done to tho person, or there be a previous struggle for the possofiskm of tho property, or some violence, or threats of violence, used to obtain it. f 1) If, however, any injury be done to tho person, or if there bo, by the person stolon from, any struggle to keep possession of the pro- perty before it is taken from him, there will be a sufficient actual violence. Thus, Avhoro the prisoner had torn some hair from a lady's head in snatching a heavy diamond pin from it, tho pin having a corkscrew stalk and being twisted in her hair, which was dosel}' frizzed and strongly craped, it was held to bo robbery. (2) (1) Reg. v. Baker, 1 Leach 290; R. v. Walls, 2 C. & K. 214; Reg. v. Wal- ton, L. & C. 288 ; R. v. Steward, 2 East. P. C. 702 ; R. v. Macauley, 1 Leach 287 ; R. v. Robins, 1 Leach 290. (2) R. V. Mcore, 1 Leach 335. I RitllllKUV. Qfi\ \\ is nol iK'cysHuiy lliat tin- tliini; wlu-ii taUt'ii shoiild lie acliiiilly (HI tlif owiH-r's luTsoii. It will lie siillii'it'iit it' l>y iiU'iiiisor violciiiM' or tlii't'iils of violence it lie laUi-ii in IiIh prcsciici'. (1) Tlierot'oi'c, if A., upon Imin^ aHSiuilted liy a thiol', throws his purso or cloak into « huwh, and th«' lliicf takos it up and carries it uwuy ; or if, while A. is flying from the thi(d', he lets fall his hut. and the tliief lakes it up and carries it away, such taking heing done in tlie presence of .\. will he snilieient. (2) if the |)ro[ierty he once taken, tiie otlence will not he purged hy the rohher delivering it liack to the owner. l''or instance, A. re(iuires 15. to deliver his pursii, and he delivors it accordingly when A. finding oidy two shillings in it, gives it to him again. This is u talcimj hy robhery. (;J) The faking, in rohhery. as in all other eases of theft inusi he aniino Jurniidi ; and therefore if a person, under a 6o/((///V/f? impres- sion tiuit tho property is his own. ohtain it hy threats, it is a trews- puss and it may ho an assault l)ut not a rohhery. Thoroforo, whoro A owed 15 money and H violently assaulted A and force(| him l>y that nu'ans to then and there pay him tlu' deld. it was iu^lil thut there was no felonious intent and no rohhery. (t) ,: ' Whore violence is used and the prosecutor forced to deliver his property under circumstances calculated to I'xcite fear, the offence will not the less amount to rohhery on account of the thief Imving had recourse to some et)loi'al>K' or s])ecious pi'otonee, in oi'dt'r the hotter to effoot liis pui-pose. Kor instance, one Hall at tho head of a riotous moh stopped on tho highway a cart ladt^n witli ohoeHos and insisted upon seizing them, for want of a permit. This was a mere protenee, no permit heing nocessury. After some altiu'cation, JIull induced the owner to go with him lieforo a magistrate ; and, while they were absent, tho mob, by preconcerted arrangement with Hall, pillaged the cart. On an action again^.t the hundred, upon the statutes of hue and cry, tlie jury found that the ort'ence was robbery. This finding was confirmed on a motion for new (1) R. V. Francis, 2 Str.lOl.-). . . (2) 3 Inst 08. . . ■ ■ ' , :'■ (3) K. V. I'eat, 1 Leach, 228. (4) See R. v. Hemming^ 4 F. it F. ."iO. 42 652 PRACTICAI, OlIinE TO MAOI8TRATB8. trial ; iind it wuh hold (Iml lh« tirst miizuro of tlm curt iiml ^oodH l»nin^ hy violonoo in invHcncoot' tho ownor it constitutod tluMttl'iMicn olio of rohbory. (1) NtoppliiK il>«' i^ailwltli liitt'iit fo Kob or N«'ar«>li It — iH iiidictui)l(> and piiiiishiiMo hy iinpi-iHoiuiioiit fur iifo (iind not loHH timn f) yoiiVH.) (Code, Art. 401.) Sramkn. Soo ARMY and navy, pp. 44fi-450, ante. Soo uJHo tlio Onvernment Vessels Discipline Act, R. S. C, o. 71, tho Seamen's Act, 11. S. C, c. 74, (witli itH umondnionts, 53 Vio., c. 16, and 57-r)8 Vic, c. 43), and tho Inland Waters Seamen's Act, li. S. C, c. 75, as aniondod hy 56 Vic, c 24. Sbarch Warrants. See pp. 117-134, ante. Seditious Offences. (!)e«litloilN WordN. — Seditious words aro words expressive of a seditious intention. NcditloUN I^ibc'l. — A seditious lihol is a libel expressive of a seditious intention. NcditJouN CoiiN|>iriM*y. — A seditious eonspirucy is an agreement between two or more ])ersons to carry into execution a se<litious intention. (Code, Art. 123.) PuiaiNliiiicnt of NeditioiiN Ofl«'ii<*(>H. — Everyone is guilty of an indictable otl'encc and liable to two years' imprison- ment who speaks any seditious woi'ds or j)ublishes any seditious libel or is a i)arty to any seditious conspiracy. (Code, Art. 124.) Seduction. Me<lii«iioii 4»t' CiiirlN l»«>tw<>eii Fourteen und Mix- teen. — Hvcry one isguilty of an indictable oti'ence and liable to two (1) Merriiiiun v. Oiippeiiliam Hundred, 2 East P. C. 701). 8RIHICTION. yi'iiTH' iiiipriHoniiuMit who soduoos or lias illicit connoction witli any i^irl »)f'))iTvi()usly cluisto cliiimctiT, of or iihovo thii a;,'o of I'ourtonn yciirH and undtd' tho ngo oCHixloun yoarn. (Codo, Art. IRl.) Tliin Articlo haw tlio wnrdH " Hcd ucoh or has illicit connection; HO that while Mcdiiclion, if |)rovod will lii^ i>uniHhal)lc it would Hooni alHo that the more act of carnal connoction with a previously chaste girl lie1wo(Mi the nffi' oC fourteen and sixteen years would ho sulfl- ciont, of itself, to constitute un otVence under this Article. N<Mlii4'tioii under l*roiiilN<> oi* ^iirrliiK«>. — Kvory one, ahove the ajjje of IwtMity-one years, is guilty of an indictahlo oll'ence und liahle to two years' imprisonment who, under promise of marriat/e, seduces am/ has illicit connoction with any unnuirried female of previously (duisto character and under twenty-one years of age. (Code, Art. 182.) Ncdiivtioiiot'WiirdfNerwaiit^Kto. — Hvery one is guilty of an indictahle ortonceaiul liable to two years' imprisonment who, being a guardian, seduces or lias illicit connection with his ward, and every one who seduces or has illicit cotmection with any woman or girl of j)roviously chaste character and under the ago of twenty- one years, who is in his employment in a factory, mill or work- shop, or who being in a common employment with him in such factory, mill or workshop, is, in respect of her employment or work in such factory, mill or workshop, under or in any way subject to his control or direction, (('ode. Art. 183.) deduction of Fc^iiiiile FtiNM<>ii)c«>rM on Y«>nm«1n.— Kvory one is guilty of an indictablo ott'ence and liable to a tine of four hundreddollars, or to oneyear'simprisonment, who, being the master or other officer or a seaman or other person employed on board of any vessel, while such vessel is in any water within tho jurisdiction of tho Pai'liamcnt of Canada, under promise of marriaije, or by threats., or by the exercise of his authority, or by solicitation, or the making of gifts or present<i. wdyu'OH ami has illicit connection with any female passenger. 2. Tho 8\ibsoquent intermarriage of the seducer and the seduced is, if pleaded, a good defence to any indictment for any ottbnco against this or either of the two next preceding sections except in the case of a guardian seducing his ward. (Code, Art. 184.) (]7)4 IMlArTirAt, (llinE to MAHIsTltATKS. Sllll'H, Cahtinci awav till l>KHriioviNti A Smi'. — Sec whecmno, p. (121, ante, uixl hw attkmi'Tm to miihdkk, p. r>fl(i. nntr. I'UKVKNTINU TIIK SaVINU OK A WllKCKKK N'KSSKI,, nil WitErK. — Si'i' p. (ili'J, tintf. Pll»VKNTlN<l TIIK SaVINO OK A Sll II'WIIKCK K|) I'kKSOn's I,1I'K,— (SocCodf, An. 2r)4.) SkNDIN(J oil 'rAMNO \Ny rNSKAWuKTIiy Shii'toSea. — It is nil iinlicliihlo olU'iicc pmiiHiialili' l»y VIVK ^'outh' iiiiprisoiiniont lor iiiiy olu> to sEMi oi- ATTKMI'T TO SBM), or Inl' ally IIUIMhT (o Ullowillgly TAKE liny Cmiadian nliip (in an iiiiscawoi'iiiy slate) to sea or on ti voyage on any of tin* inland walcis ni' Canada, or on a voyago botw<''.'.i thf n'Mpcclivi' ports o|' ihr inland walt-rs of Canada and tlu' inilcd Slates. (Code. Arlieles I'.'dl and LTtT ) .Sou AiisoN, pp. 150 455. ante. SaKKTY ok SiIII'S ami I'UKVKNTION OK .\ (TIUKNTS TIIKIIKoV. See l{. S. ('., e. 77, it'd \if., e. 22, .'JKii') Vie., e. 3S, and .'t7 5S Vie., e- 44. Inspection of Smi'.s and Steamiioats.— .Scc p. .^)7!i, tmte. Siiii'i'iNQ OK liiVE SrofK. — Soo 54-').') \'ic.. e. ;{(;. Markino ok I»E(K a.mi Load Links. — See 54-55 Vie., e. Id. See also 5() Vic., e. 22. SlIooTINd. V SiiooTiNM WITH Intent TO Murdek. — See atte.mi'ts to MriinEH. |). 5()(.!. ante. Siiootinu with Intk.ntto Woind, Ktc. — See woi ndi.no. /)oa^ PoiNTiNu A KiuEAK.M. — See ]). (jii2, ante. See AS. .1.ULT8 ON THE QiJKEN. ]>, l(J5, ante. Spring (Suns. Settino Si'RiNfi »iiiNS AND Man Trai's. — This is indielalile anil punislialiie by FIVE years' iinpri.soiuuent if done with intent to des- troy or iuHiot grievous bodily harm on any trespasser or otiier per- son coming in contact with the instrument .set. (Code, Art. 24!>.) HtTKMDK, — HINttAY. II6A Sii('ii)«, .%i«llll|C IIIkI .iliclllliu; Mlll4'i4l«*.— Kvcryitiic \h u;iiilty ot' ill I iii(lirtitl)l(M)ll'(>iic«aiiil liiililc to iinprisiiiiiMiMil I'm- lil'c wlm <-i>uiinoIh nr pnicuri'M any |K«rHiiii In coiiimit Hiiiiidt-, urlimlly cnniinilliMl in roiisi'qiiciicc III' Hiicli nimiHi'iliiij^ nr |iriiniri'irii'iit. or wlm aiils or alii'ls any |»rsoii in I lu' roinniis^tion of siiiriilo. (Codo, Arl. mUl.) .ill 4>iii|»f l«i 4'4>iiiiiiil Niil4*i«l('.— I'lviM-yonn wlioatti'inplM lo comiiiii siiiciijr is o'liiii V (iT ill! iiKJiiiiilili' oMciii'i' ami lialili'io two ynirn' iniiirisimnicnl. (('oilr. Art. 23H.) SrMiAY. In till' provinri' III' t^iu'licr. it is |irovi(|c(l thai, (with tlu> cxrop- lioii of till' sale at cliiircli ilonrs of count ry pai'isln's o|' the (^H'crts arisini; I'l'oin piiMic gallmrin^M I'or ilif licnciii o|' ciiiirchi's or ilio-.c ili'siiiicii lot' pious pnrposi's). no siiiii>i<kki'kii, I'KDi.AK, iiAWKKiior oTiiEK I'KHsoN siiiiil sill or ri'tiiil any gooils. wai'i's or ini'i'dianilisi' iluriiig Siinilay. uinli'i' a prnalty not I'xi'ociling ^20 for tlii' tirsi oH'oiui' ami no( li- s tlianf^JU or mori' tiiaii ^10 for rvi'ry suiisiMjuont olViMici". ( li*. S. (^.. Art.;iH»S.) Mill no prosi'ciition shall In' insti- tiilcil for any surh liiK' iinli-s.s it he eonuiu'iici'il within two months afti-r till- ollciifo I'oimiiitlfil. (R. S. (l, Art, ;;,'i(ll ) Wlu'i'i- ifcncral wonU j'dllow parliriihir ones thi' rule is to i-on- striir thrill as applicahlc lo pi'rsons ejiis'lein generis ; (1 ) ami, llicrc- forci, tlio wonls 'on oiiir.it pkubon " in the aliovc Articlo, 3498! of the l>. S. <^. niiist hr taken to iiiclmli' only all persons of tin* saino ileseriplioii as ijiose partieiilari/.cil in tliu jircceding words, " HHoi'KEErKK. I'KiiKAR, iiAWKKii," that is to say, all piTsoiiH follow- ing .sonio puvlicMilar calling covorod by thu doscription conlainod in the words siioi'IvEKI'KR. I'Eni-Ait and hawker. Article T2!t of the Code, provides that the taking of the verdict of the Jury shall not he invalid hy reason of its hapiiening on a Sunday. Si RETiEs For the Peace. Soo pp. 419-422, ante. (1) Per Lord Tenterden, in Saiidiniau v. Breath, 7 B. & C. 100. tiftU IMiACTIOAI. onitK TO MAillHTItATKH. TllBKT, TliliiKM 4*a|iiil>l«> ol* Ik'Iiik NIoI«»ii.— Kvi>iy iMiiiiiinulo tliiii;^ \vhal(>v«'r which \h the properly ol uuy porMoii, uml which cilhor ir* or iiiuy lit' iiiiiih' inovcuhU', Nhiill ht'iicct'ortli h«> cnpahh' ol' li«<iii^ mIoU-ii iih mioii iiH it lii'coiiit'N nioV(>ahlt',ullhoii^h il In iiiii<lt' iMovi<uhli> in onlur to Htt'iil it : Provided, timt nolliin^ ^rowiti^ out of tht« eftrth of II viiliie hot exeeedilij^ I went y live ceiils Hhiill (except in tho eawcH olhorwiMo provided) Lo doomed eapuhlu of buiii^ stolwn. (Code, Art. :U)3.) AiiIiiihIn <'n|»nhl«' of I><>Iiik Nlol<>n.— All tmne living Croat 11 rcM, whet Iter tamo hy nature or wild liy iiutiiro and tamed, Nhiill hu eupalilo of boin^ htoleii ; hut tamo pigooiiH Hhall lie capahlo of hoiii^ hIoKmi so loii^ only aH I hoy are in a dovooolo or on iheir owner'H land. 2. All liviii)^ oroaturoH wild ]>y naturo, Nuch as aro not commonly found in a condition of natural lihorty in (*anada, hIuiII, if Uopt in a Htato of oontinomoiit, bo cupablo of hoing Mtolon, not only wlillo thoy aro HO eon ti nod but Jiftor thoy havooneapod from oontinemont. 3. All other living eroaturoH wild hy naturo mIuiII, if kept in a Mtato of conlinement, lie ca|)ahle of heiiij^ Mtolon ho long an thoy remain in conlinomont or aro being uctually pursuod aftor oHcai»ing thorofrom but no longor. 4. A wild living oroaturo Hhall ho doomod to bo in a Htato ol'con- Hnomont ho long aw it Ih in a don, oago or small oi\oloHuro, styo or tank, or is othorwiHo so situated that it cannot oscapo and that its owner can take possession of it at pleasure. 5. Oyfltorsand 03'stor brood ishall ho capable of being stolen when in oyster beds, layings, and tisheries which aro the projjorty of any person, and suffloiontly marked out or known as such property. 6. Wild creatures in the enjoyment of their natural libertv shall not bo capable of being stolen, nor shall tho taking of their dead bodies by, or by tho orders of, tht! person who killed them before thoy aro reducoil into actual possession by tho owner of tlio land on which thoy died, bo doomed to bo theft. 7. Every thing produced by or forming part of any living cmitiironipul)!.. ..f lK.|n« Htolon «|iul| |„, ,.,ip,il,l,. of iK-inir NtoUm (('<hI«', Art. ;j()l.) TiM'f'l I»«>IIimmI.— Tlu^ft or ntottling Ih tin. not o\' fraudulently and »vy/wu^ colour of right taking, ov rmii.lul.'nUy himI wiMu.iU c.ih.ur of riglii, miw^rfiflj/ to the use of imy |hw-.oii, ui.yihin^ cuimhlo of boiiig Nfolon, ivith intent — (rt) to deprive tint ownor, or ;uiy |M«rM.n Imvin;^ imy NjKutial pro- ptu-Jy or iiiti-rcHt thuroin, tKinporurily or alwolutoly of mucIi thing or of Miicli property or itiltiroHt ; or (/>) to pledye Hut wirne or dopoHit it iin Hocurity ; or (c) U, part with it under a condition hh to Kn rotiirii, whiiJi tli" pernoii piirtiiig witli it may bo unable to perform; or (</) to deal with it in mucIi u manner tliat it cannot he restored in tho condition in which it waH at the time of wnch tal<in^' and con vorwion. 2. The taking or convcrMion may lio frandident.allliongh cH'tictod without secrecy or attempt at concc-alment. 8. It in immaterial whether the thing converted waN taken for tho purpoHe of converHion, or whether it wan, at the time of the converMion, in the hiwful itoHMCHNion of the person converting. 4. Theft is committed when the ottendur moveM tlie thing or eauHCH it to move or to be moved, or hi'gins to cause it to beconu) moveable, with intent to steal il. 6. Provided that no factor or agent shall bo guilty of theft by pledging ov giving a lien on any goods or document of title to goods intrusted to lum for the purpose of sale or otherwise, for any sum of money not greater than tho amount duo to liim from his prin- cipal at the time of pledging or giving a lien on tho same, together with the amount of any bill of exchange uccoptod by him foror on account of his principal. 6. Provided, tlnit if any servant, contrary to the ordei-s of his master, takes from his possession any food for tho pi^rpose of giving tho same, or having tho same given to any horse or other animal belonging to or in the possession of his ma8tor, the servant 658 PRACTICAL (lUIDE TO MAdlSTHATKS. su olluiidiiig hIuiII not, by rouHon thevoof, bo guilty ot'thol't. (Code. Art. ;J05. Tho \)h\'mo, ^- without color of right," ioruunir |iai't of the nbovo dotinilioii oi' llu'Ct, soi'ius (u be iulendod to lalo' tlie place of tbo word feloniously, wliieli in coiiueetioii with the deliiiitioii of larceny is usually said to mean •' without color of rinht." (I) Theft niaj" be t-ithei- simple or aygravatetl. Simple theft is wo closely eoniioeted with ci-rtain kinds of fraiids that the two sub- ji'cts run into each other. T\n'i'\ , iii/i/nivatid by tvolenc'.. \s either rohliery or extortion; and thefl, accoin|ianied by wilful ti'espass on a dwelling-house, is either burglary or housebreaking. Theft is no longer restricted to what, under the common law, constituted the otleiice of stealing or larceny — the principal ingre- dient of which was the physical as[(i)rtation or laUing or carrying away of i)ei'sonal pro)»erty out of the ])OSKession and against the will of the owner — but it is extende(l to and madi' to cover all other means of fraudulent misappropriation ; so that theft, as a gen- eral term, now includes ev(uy thing ami I'vi'ry act amounting to larceny under the common law, as one of the dilVerent ways in which the olVence of theft maybe eommilled. Ibit whether the act be a TAKINO of the thing out of the owner's possession, or a ooNVElisioN of it while in the otVender's lawful possession, the essence of the otT'ence will still be tlu^ intent with which the act is done. For instance, if A. were to place his horse and cart opposite to H.'s door, and H., not wishing to have them there, were to lay hold of the horse and lead it away, an<l leave it and the cart at a short distance from where it originally stood, there would be a taking by li. of the iiorse and curt into his temporary i)ossession, but no conversion and no intent to dei)rive \. of his property. H.'s intent being merely to remove the horse and cart tVom oppo.site to B.'s door (where tliey were in A.'s ])ossession), to another place away from B.'s door, whore they still remain in .\.'s ])ossossion. If, iinder color ol' having a claim for arrears of rent, A. distrains the cattle of B., his tenant, this may amount to a civil wrong — a tresjiass, for instance, under the common law of England as to civil matters — but no theft. (2) ( 1 ) R. V. Thurborn, 1 Den. 388 ; 2 C & K. 831 (2) 1 Hale, 509. TIIEKT. 65!) It' A., luiving (1(1110 work upon an urticlo, roturiis it to B., tho owner, and then, on ii dispute tirisiiiy hetwoon thorn as to tho prieo to be jiaid for tlic \vorl<, A. takes and carries oil' tin; article against B.'s will, honestly intending; to hold it as security lor the amount which is alle<rod to ho duo to him, this is no theft, although in ftict it turn out that there was nothing due to him. (1) Under subsootion 4, of article 1^1(5, theft by taking is committed as soon as the otfcndcr moves the thing, or causes it to move or to he moved, or hegins to cause it to licconie nioveahle, with intent to steal it. Where a thief, intending to steal some plate, took il (Uit of a chest in wliicli it mus. and laid it down u|)on tiic floor. Imt was surprised lieforo he eoulil make otf with it, it was held a sutficient taking ; (^2) and where, with the intention of stealing a cask of wine, the thief removed it from the head to tlu' tail of the wagon upon whi( li it lay. il was also held sutlicienl. (3) 'I'lu' transfer, l>y a letter-carrier, of a lettei' from his |)oucli to his pocket was held a sutlicient asportation. (4) AVliere the thief was unable to carry otf the goods on account of their being attached by a string on the counter, (5) or to carry off a pur.se on account of sonu- keys attached to the strings of it getting entangled in the owner's jjocket. ((!) il was heUl m these eases that there was not a sutlicient carrying away to constitute larceny, but that to render tho asporation comjilete in siudi cases there must be a severance. It would seem likel}-, however, that under sub.section 4, of article ;>()5. these cases may now be held to be covered, so as to make them thfft bytnkiiuj; for that sul)section makes it a sutticient taking as soon as th«; olfender moves the thing, or causes it to move, or begins to cause it to be moveable. It is clear that, under the common law not only was it no larceny if the owner himself of his own free-will [)arted with the jiroperty (1) R. V. 'W'ade, UCox, 549. (2) R. v. Simpson, Kel.31 ; 1 Hawk. c. So, s. 2.'>. (:;) R. V. Walsh, 1 Moo. C. C. 14. (4) R. V. Poynton, L. & ( '. 247 ; 32 L. J. (M. C.) 29. (5) i4»oji, 2 East. P. C. 55(). (G) K. V. Wilkinson, 1 Hale, 5C8. 660 PRACTICAL OUIDE TO MAGISTRATES. in the goods taken ; (I) but the same principle applied whenever the servant from vvhon goods were obtained had a general author- ity to act ibr his employer, and while acting under such general authority willingly parted with the goods ; the person to whom they were thus delivered not being guilty of larceny. For instance, where a person obtained money from the cashier of a bank by presenting, knowing it to be forged, a forged order purporting to be drawn by one of the bank's customers, it was held not to bo larceny ; because the cashier voluntarily parted with the money, and was acting within the scope of his general authority. (2) Where a person, having tlie animus furandi, obtained possession of goods by means of some trick or artitice, it was considered lar- ceny, under the common law, even though there was an actual delivery, if the owner did not intend to part with his entire right of property, but only with the temporary possession of the goods. Where A., by means of what is known as the ^urse trick, induced B. to give him a shilling for a pui'se by showing B. three shillings and then making it appear as if he. A., had dropped them into the purse whereas in fact he had only dropped in three half-pence, it was held not to be larceny, but false pretences. (3) Where an automatic box, the property of a company, was placed in a public passage, and was so constructed that, upon a penny being placed in it, through a slot, a cigarette was ejected from it, and the prisoner, instead of putting a penny in the box put into it a metal disc of the size of a penny, and so obtained a cigarette, he was held guilty of larceny. (4) With regard to larceny of lost things, the general rule, under the common law, seems to have been that if a person found goods which had been actually lost or reasonably supposed by him to have been lost, and appropriated them, with intent to take the entire dominion over them, really believing, when he took them, (1) R. V. Macgrath, L. R. 1 C. C. R. 205 ; R. v. Harvey, 1 Leach, 467; R. v Adame, R. & R. 225 ; R. v. Colemqn, 2 East, P. C. 672 ; R. v. Tliomas, 9 C. & P. 741 ; R. V. Atkinson, 2 East, P. C. 673. (2) R. V. Prince, 1 C. C. R. 205. (3) R. V. Solomons, 17 Cox, C. C. R. 93. (4) R. V. Hands, 16 Cox, C. C. R. 188. TBBFT. 661 that the owner coi'.Ul not bo found, it was not hirceny ; but if he tooli them with the like intent, though lost, or reasonubly supposed to be lost, but reasonably believing that the owner could bo found, it was larceny. (1) it was necessary that the pnsoner at the time of finding, should believe that the owner could be ascertained, and without this, un intention to appropriate, at the time of the finding, did not make the prisoner guilty of larceny, although he ascer- tained the name of the owner before converting to his own use. (2) It will be seen that now, under Article 305, a finder of lost goods will render himself liable to prosecution for theft by conversion, if after finding the goods he discover the name of the owner and do not restore them, but converts them to his own use, although at the time of finding them he neither knew the owner nor believed nor had reasonable grounds for believing that the owner could be found. The following are some of the cases decided under the old rule. A. put 900 guineas in a secret drawer in a bureau, and died. B., her son and executor, lent the bureau to his brother, C, who, after keeping it several years, sold it to 1)., who gave it out to be repaired by E., who found the money. Held, to be such a taking, by E., out of the possession of A., as to constitute larceny. (3) If a cabman converted to his own use a parcel left by a passenger in his cab, by mistake, it was larceny, by the common law, if he knew the owner, or if he took him or sot him down at a particular place where he could have enquired for him. (4) In every case where the property was not, properly speaking, lost, but only mislaid, under circumstances which would enable the owner to know where to look for and find it, the person finding and aj^propriiiting property so mislaid was held guilty of larceny * under the common law. The subject of larceny, or, theft by taking, as we may now call it, is intimately connected with the doctrine of property, and more (1) 3 Inst. 108 ; 1 Hawk, c. 33, a. 2. (2) R. V. Thurborn, 1 Den. 388 ; 2 C. <Sr K. 831 ; R. v. Christopher. Bell, 27 ; B. V. Kerr, 8 C. & F. 176; R. v. Reed, C. & Mar. 306; R. v. Matthews, 12 Cox, C. C. R. 489. (3) Cartwright v. Green, 8 Ves. 406 ; 2 Leach, 952. (4) B. V. Wynne, 2 East, P. C €64 ; 1 Leach, 413 ; R. v. Lear, 1 Leach, 415 n (tfi2 PRACTtcAr, (hhhk to maoistuatks. imrtit'ularly with tliiit purl of it wiiich I'l'lati-s to imissession ; iiiid tlu> point upon which. miiU'r llio conuiion law, tlic most sulitlc (|uostioiis iiavc arisen as to possession was .the distinction between theft and ('>nl)<'::l,vu'nt in connection with whitdi it has heen hehi that. Ihoiiifh tile master's possei^nion continued wiien he liiniselt' gave tlie curtail;/ of a tinny; to his servant, it (the inastiTs posses- sion) did not be//in wlien liie servant received from sonu' one else, a thing for or an account of I lie master. So, that, a servant, liaving received something on ids mastei-s account tVom n liurd person, committed emhezzlenient, if lu' appropi-iated it before doing an act to ve.st the pos.session of it in ins master, iiul if he approjiriated it, after doing some such act, he comndtted theft. This useless dis- tinctii>n between 'riiKi'"r and eiulie/./.ienient is now I'Utirely removed bj- Articles 3(l5 and ;5t)S-;Ut» of the Code. Kor sjiecitic acts of tiikft and the diilerenl punishmenis imposed according to the description of the article stolen or the position or occupation of the oll'endcr. set^ .\rticles .■!l!i-;!5T of the ("ode : and see also tlu' t.vule of iNnicTAnLE ofkkncks at ji. "JSS ante, and tlie TAiu.E of No.v-iN'DlCT.viu.K otfcnces at |>. K»'( ante. TiK'ft O^TIlill^-N llll«l4>l* ^»«*i*liro. — lOvery one commits tlieft and steals the thing taken or cari'ied away who. wlielher preteiuling to be the owni'i- or not. secretly or openly. taUes or carries away, or causes to l)0 taken or carried away, without lawful authorit}'. any property under lawful seizure and detention. (Code, Art. 30(1. ) Ntcaliii^r I'lMiiii tlli' I"«'rN«ii. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable (dfence ami liable to fourteen j'cars' imprisonment who steals any ••battel, money or valuable security from the ]ierson of another, ((.'ode, Art. 344.) To constitute this ortence. the thing must be taken either from the person of the prosecutor, or in bis jireseuce. (1) Wliere A. drew a book from the inside of Us coat pocket about an inci> above the top of the pocket, but, whilst the book was still about B's jierson, B. suddeidy put \ip bis band, when A. let go his hold and the book dro])ped back into the pocket. Held not to constitute stealing from the person, but a sim|)le hirceuy. (2) (1) R. v. Francis. 2 Str. 101.5 ; R. v. Grey, 2 East, P. C. 708. (2) R. v. T1jouii)sou, 1 Mood, 7S. TIIEt'T. fi(i3 MloiiliiiK; ill ll«v«>lliiiu;-ll4»llM«'M. — Kvt-ry one is ^'iiilly oraii iiidictahlc olVi'iicc and ialilc to lourhu'ii yi-ars' ihi|>ris()iniu'iil wliit — (n.) steals in any (Iwciliiif^-lioiisc any cliaftt'I. money or vnluahle security U^ tlie value in tiie wliole ol' Uveiily-tive dollars or more ; or, (/;.) steals any chattel, money or valnaMi' seeurit_y in any dwell- ing-honse. and hy any menace or threat puts anyone therein in liodily tear. (Code. Art. ;J4').) Wlu-re a person in ids own d\vellint;-house stole i'rom anotiier person goods of the valne of (JT), it was held to constitnte, nnder the I'Jiylish statute, the ollenee of stealinuf in a dwelliny-honse. (1) A. a lody(,'r, invited B. an aei|uainlance. to sleep at Ins !odgina;s. (without the knowlcMJife of ('., the landlord of the iiouse. ) and durinj.^' the infill. A. stole B's wateh iVom the hed's head. Jlcld. that A. was properly convicted of stcaliny- in the dwelling' house. if one, (jn jfoinui; to heil. put his clothes and money hy his hedside, they are under tlu^ i)rotection of the dwelling house, and utit of the jiurson. (ii) |{i*ill^;ill^' Hlolvii l*i'0|»4'i*ly iiilo C'aiuKla. — livery out! is guilty of an indictal)leo Hence and liaMi^ to seven yi'ars' impri- sonment who, having obtained elsewlu^i'e than in Canada any i)ro- perty l»y any act which if done in (Canada would have amounted to theft, brings such property into oi' has tiie same in Canada. (Code, Art. ;j55.) ' ; . \: v Nl«'aliii{> Tllill^^N ii4»( of IicimvImo I'rovidtMl lor. — Kverj' one is guilty of an indictable ott'ence and liable to seven j-oars' imiirisonment who steals anything, for the stealing of which no punishment is otherwise provided, or c(Mnmits in respect thereof any oH'ence for which he is liable to the .same punishment as if he had stolen the same. il) K V. Bowden, 2 Mood. ('. C. 285; 1 C c^ K. 147. (2) R. V. Tayior, K. ct. H. 418. (3) li. V. Thomas, Cur. .Sup. 21».). 664 I'RACTICAl. UlUDB TO MAUI8TRATE.S. 2. Tlio offondev is Hahlo to iou years' im|>riHoniiH'nt it' ho has iiocii previously coiivietod ot'tiiot't. (Code, Art. ;{5().) TllRKATS. ■ \ €'oin|»<'lliiiK Kx<'ciitioii oi'llo«*iiiiit>iitN h;;^' Forvp or TlimitN oI'VloIoiiCi'. — Kvery ouo is guilty of an indict- al)lo otI'oiH'i' and lialile to ini|irisoninent for life who, with intent to defraud, or injure, hy uidawful violence to, or restraint of the person of another, or hy the threat that either the oltbndor or any other per- son willeinj)loy such violence or restraint, unlawfully compels any person to execute, make, aece|>t, endorse, alter or destroy the whole or any part of an^' valuahle security, or to write, imjiressor attix any name or seal |n])on any paper or parchment, in order that it may be afterwards made or converted into or used or dealt with as a valuable secnrit}'. The ])rovision contained in tliis article, 402, meets such cases as R. V. I'hipoe, in which it was held that where one })ers(m compelled another, by threats, to sign a promissory note it was no robbery, the note being of no value to the party signing it. (1) I>viiiaii«linff with iiitciitto NttMll. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to two years' imprisonment who, with menaces, demands from any person, either for himself or for any other ]H'rs()n, anything capable of being stolen with intent to steal it. (Code, Art. 404.) The gist of the ott'ence is the demand itself accompanied with menaces and an intent to steal ; and, therefore, if such a demand is successful it amounts to an actual theft. As menaces are of two kinds, — by words or by gestures, — it seems that it is not necessary to prove an express demand in words. but that if the words or gestures of the defendant at the time were plainly indicative of what he required and tantamount in fact to a demand, though not in actual words, it would seem to be sufficient proof of the allegation, in the indictment, of a demand. (2) (1) K. V. Phipoe, 2 Leach, (>73. (2) K. v. Jackson, 1 Leach, 2(39. THREATS. 6(;5 Tlir«'nt4'iiiiiff liCttcrw. — Kvory ono in ^'iiilfy o\' un indict- able ortonco and lialtlo to fburtoon years' impriHonnuMit who wonds, dolivovH or ntloi-s, or diroctly or indiivctly cauites to be reffeived. kiiowiiiiuj the ('oi\teiits thereof, any letter or writing demandimj of any person with menaces, and without aiij' reaH()nai)le or ])rohahle cause, any property, ehattol, money, vahuihle security or other va- luable thin<^. It will be sutlieient evidence of the sending or causing to be re- ceived to prove that the defendant placed the letter in a ])Iace where he knew the ])roHecutor would come, and that it tluis reach- ed him, or, that it was there picked up by another piu-son and by him delivered to the jtrosecutor ; (1) or that the letter is in the defendant's handwriting and came to the prosecutor tlirough the post. (2) Sending a letter to A., in order that he maj' deliver it to B., is a sending to B., if the letter is delivered by A. to ii. (3) And the leaving of a letter, directed to A., near A's htmse, with the inten- tion tluit it should not only reacli A. but B. also, was held to bo a sending of it to B., by whom it was afterwards seen. (4) The words " without any reasonable or probable cause " apply to the demand for money, and not to the threatened accusation to be made against the pro.secutor ; and therefore it is immaterial in point of law whether the threatened accusation be true or not. (5) Tlir<'»tN to avciiNC oi' a rupital or liiraiiioiiN vriiiil'. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment who, with intent to extort or gain anything from any person — :' (a.) accuses or threatens to accuse either that person or any other person, whether the person accused or threatened with accusation is (/uiitt/ or not. — of — (i) any ottei\ce i)unisbable by law with death or imprisonment for seven years or more ; (ii) any as.sault with intent (1) R. V. Lloyd, 2 East, P. C. 1122 ; K. v. VVaj,'8tafl', R. & R. S08. (2) R. v. Hemming, 2 East P. C 1116 ; R. v. Jep3on, 2 East, P. C. 1115. (S; K. V. Paddle, R. & R. 484. (4) R. v. Grimwade, 1 Den. 30 ; I C. & K. o92. (5) R. V. Hamilton, 1 C. <k K, 212 ; R. v. Gardner, 1 C. & P. 479. (KUi I'llACTICAL (irrt)E TO MAdlSTUATBN. to ('oiiiiiiii II i'a|K'. or any Htti>in|it or ciKloaxoui' to iniiuiiit a i'a|)(>. or any imlcctMil aHsault ; (iii) carnally Unowin;^ or attfiMplinji; (o know any fliild so an (o l)o iPunisliaMf nnder lliisAtI ; (iv) any infamous oIliMU-i-, thai is to nay lin^ncry, an alti'mpl or assault with int'.^nt to t'oniniit lin!xu;»'ry, or any unnatural |ira('lico, or in- cest ; (v) counselling^ or procurlnif any person to coniniit an}' such infamous otVcncc ; or {h.) ihivali'Ms tiiat any person shall Ixt so accused hyanyot]\er person ; or (c.) causi's any pi-rsoii to ri'ceive a document containing sucli accusation i>r threat, knowing the contents thereof ; or Qi.) I>3' any of llie means aforesaid compels or atleni|its to com- pel an}' ])erson to execute, make, accept, endorse, alter or destroy thi' whole or any part of any valiiaMe security, or to write, impress or allix any name or seal upon oi- to any paper or parchment, in order that it may he afterwards made or converted into or used ov dealt witii as a valuahle si'curity. (Code, Art. 40').) Under tiiis Article, the accusation or the threat to accu.se nuiy he either verhal or in the shaiu' id' a document. It .seems that the thi'cat uee(l not he a threat to accuse liet^oro a judicial trilniual; l)Ut that a threat to make the accusation heforo a third parly is sutlicient. ( 1) I'roof that the prisoner went to the prosecutor, and threatened to accuse his son of an unnatural otlence with a imire uidess the prosecutor would huy the mare foi- ,t!3. was held to sustain an imiictment for threatening to accuse of an ahominahle crime, witli intent therehy to extort monoy. (2) fiXtortioii l».y Tliroatw io A4*<*iiMt' ol' iiii^ oilier OftVllCC. — Kvery one is yuilty of an indictahle olfence, and liable o imprisonment for seven years who — (((.) witli intent to extort or gain anything from any person accuses or threatens to accust^ either that ])ei'son or any other person of any otlence other than tiiose specitied in the last section, (1) R. V. Robiusoii, 2 M. & Rob. 14. (2) K. V. Eledman, L R. 1 C. C. I^. 12. THADl-MAHKH.— THKASON. ^^^,J Whether the person accused or threatened with lucuNuf i„n L, ouilfu ornof ot thiit oH'i'iict' ; or "^ •^ (i.) wi.l. su.-h i„,.nl UH ufbrosui.l, fhroatons tl,a, any ihtkom wluvll bo HO accUHwl by any \m'mm ; or (c.) ,.au...s ai.y|.(M-son to romvo a (I.H.unu.nt contuinino. snch aocusat.o.i or throat knowing thu cont.uits thoroof ; or ('/.) hy any of (ho moans aioroHai.l, ..o,n|u-ls or atton.nts to coin- pH any porson (o oxocuto, n.ako, ac-eopt, on.b.rso, alter or .U-Htrov ""■ ;;;''<'l" ->•• any part of any vahuiblo Hoourity.or to write, inn.ross ••"•artix any nan.o or soal upon or to any paper or parchmen , in <;nlo.- that >t nmy be afterw-anls n.a.U. or eonverte.l iluo or use.l or Uealt with (\H a vainal)le Neeuriiy. (Codo, Art. 40«.) A .ioman.l,-with n.enaee.s,-of money a.-tually due is not a .lo- iiiand with intent to steal. (1) See EXToHTfoN, p. 5:^0, ante. See hohukry, ante, p. t;49. ante. TRADE MARKS. N.. o ■ „„„>.„«M,„E, .00 Arlul,., J4;i l„ 45.1 „r ,!,„ C,,,!,. I' ■ ' U, U. « .„„1 22 „f tho *„./,„„*., Man. Off.,.„s J ,s « 5 .^ Tv-il ;. 35. ■• '■■ ^' "'"' "■- "'"«"<l"'<"■l^ M Vu- «. 14 a,„l TREASON. Tr"* >""-'"' "'*""' I'«»iNl.UM«t tor Tr.„MM..- (a.) the act of kijling Her Majesty, or doing her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, nnvin. or .t.nding'a tl^. act ot impnsoning or restraining her ; or to^tmlwT"^^'"^"^""''^''"^ ^^"" '^^--^ act an intention toj^ll Her Majesty, or to do her any bodily harm tending to (1) R. V. Johnson, U. C. Q. B. 569. 43 068 I'HACTICAL Ut;il»E Til MAm«TI(.VTKS. (Ii'iitli III- ilcstnictioii. iiisiiin or wounding', or In iin|inMoii or to ivstraiii lit'i" ; or {(J.) till' act ot' Uilliiiif tlu' I'lili'st son ami licir a|i|iari'iit of Hit Muifsiv. or till' l^iu'i'ii coiiHoi't ol' any King of llu' I'liitod King (Itiin of (iiral Bi'itaiii anil Irclaml ; or (d.) till' foi'niin^' ami inanifoHtitig, by an oviTt art. an inlcntion to kill tilt' I'liU'st Hon ami hi>ir n|i|ian'nt of lici' Maji'sty, or tin' t^uccn consort of any King of tlu' rnitcd Kingdom of (ircal lii-itain and litdaml : or (e.) conspiring witli any person to kill Her Majesty, or to do her any Imdily harm tending to death or destruction, maim oi' wounding oi' conspii-ing with any pei'son to imprison or restrain her ; or {f.) levying war against Ifer Majesty either — (i.) with intent to depose Her Majesty from the style, hoiionv and royal name of the imperial Crown of the I'nited Kingdom of I i real Mritain and Ireland or of any other of \lvy .Majesty's dominions or coimti'ios ; (ii.) in order, li}' force or I'onstraint. to conipel Wiv Majesty to ( liange her measures or coiinaulM, or in order to intimiilate or over- awe hoth Houses or either House of Parliament of tlu^ United Kingdom or of ( Canada ; or {(J.) conspiring to levy war against Her Majt'siy with any such intent or for any such purpose as aforesaid ; or (h.) instigating anj- foreigner with force to invade the said United Kingdom or Canaila or any other of the dominions of IFer .Majesty ; or («.) assisting any public enemy at war with Her .Nfajesty in such war by any means whatsoever; or (j.) violating, whether with lier consent or not, a Queen con- sort, or the wife of the elilest son and heir apparent, for the time being, of the King or (^ueen regnant. 2. Every one who commits treason is guilty of an indictabU' otfence and liable to sutler death. (Code, Art. (!'».) THKAsr.N. jg^ . ''■•**"'* »»»>«* <'»n«|»lnM..v. -In ..v.rv nis.. i„ wl,i..l. i, IS trnis,,,, In ,.uMH|.iro with any p.-rso,, for unv |M.r|Mw„. flu, ,».t of HO cons,„rin;r, un.l ovory ov..rt <i.t <.f any suol, c.,ns,,i,.a..v i. an overt uct of iivasoii. (Oodc. An. (Ki.) i<-<<'MMirl<M«iin«.rtlM> f-iMl i«Trv„N«i,.--i:v„,von. «s guilty of an in-ILMahlo otlonoc a.wl lial.lo lo two ymrn' iniiMisun- inoiit who — ' (a.) hccomoM an acriMso.-y aft< .• the fa<-t to troason ; ,„■ (A.) knowinsr that any (H-rson is ahoul to ,.oM,n,i( hvasot, dooH "ol wilhal ivasonahh. .h'spatd. gin. infnr.nalion tl.o.vof to u JUHtieo ol tho peace, or „se other reasonal.l.. ..M.leavuurs to prevent llie coniinissioh of tlic same. (Code, Art. (17.) l-«'v.yiiiK; uar 11^,11,1^1 ||,<. <|,M.,.„.-(See p 005, ante. TlMMIMMlubl,. OHV,liM'N.-Kveryone is i..mitvof an i.nliet- aNeort'oneean.i linl.le to i risonn.eut for life who'fonns anv of llH* intentions lureinafler menlione,!, an.j manifests any sueh inli-ntion l.y conspirinn- witii any person to carry it into otteet or l.y any other overt act, or l.y puMishini;' anv printino- <.r wrilin-. ■ that is to say — "^ ' (a.) an intention to depose Her Majestv from the style honour and royal name of the Imperial Crown of the I'nited kin..dom <.f (.mit Hritain and Ireland, or of any other of Her .Majesty's .lomin- lons or countries ; (0.) an intention to levy war a-ainst llor Majesty within anv part ot the I'nited Kingdom, or of Canada, in order l.y force oV constraint to compel her to .■hange her measures or counsels or in order to jmt uny force or constraint upon or in order lo intimidate or overawe l.oth Houses or eitl.er House of I'arliament of th,. United Ivingdom or of Canada ; (c.) an intention t<. move (.r stir any foreigner or stranger with force to invade the «aid United Kingdom, or Canada, or anv oilier o Jler Majesty s d<.minions or countries under the authority of Jler Majesty. (Code, Art. OO.) CoiiNpiriuy t« iutiii.i<l»to a I.OKi«lttt.,re.-(Sce Art. 70 of the Code.) ^ Assaults on the queen.— (See p. 405, a^i^e;.) (170 PRAf'Tlf'AI, til tltr, T<» M.VdIHTRATM. VAtlllA.NCV. Kvorv irni" in ii loom', iillo or diKonlcrly ihthoii or vtii;i'aiit who — (d.) imi liuviii^ iiiiy viMili|«> iiu'iins nf iiiiiiiitaiiiiii^ liiii)m>lt' livvM willioiil riii|i|(>yiiiciit ; (/>.) In'iii^ iiM»' to work iiikI tlicn'liy or hy oiIut iiu'iiiih to iniiiii- lain liiihsflt' ;uiil I'liiiiily will'iilly rt'l'iiM'N or in'^lcrtH to do so : (c.) o|K'iily i'X|ioMt's or I'xhiliiiH ill any Ht root, road, lii^'liwnyor piililic |ilii('t'. any indt't'cnt cxliiliilioii ; (>/. ) willioiil a I'crtillialc ><i>;nt'd. within nix inotiilis. \<y a pricHt ''lci%^yiiiaii or ininiHtcr <d' lh<< tioNpcl, or two jiistiroH of the iicacO) rchidin^ in I lie niiiniiipality whoro tUv ainiH aru l)uiii^ iixUcd. that In- or Hhc in a ili'si'r\ iiii;; olijcft of diarity, waiKh'iis alioiit and Iu'i^k or i^oi's ahoiit from door lo door, or phutw himself or hors If in any ^*tr^'ut, hij,'liway. juissa^*' or pnltlic platf to lu«j^ or rcirivt' almn ; (fi.) loiters on any siret't, road, highway or piihlic place, ami olpslri)<'lH pasx'nii'crs liy standing' across the footpath, or liy using iiisultiii.tc lan^^ua^e, or in any oliu'r way , (f.) caiisi'H a dislurhanc*' in or near any street, road, hi^'hway or piihlic pliicf, hy soreainiiiit?, swearing or singing or hy heingdrunU, or l>y iin|iedil)g or ineommoding peacoalde passeiigern : (ij.) hy diseharging tire arms, or hy riotous or disorderly eon- iluc't ill anystriH't or highway, wantonly disturhs the peaco and quiet of tho inmates of any dwelling-honse near such street or high- way; (A.) tears down or defaces signs, hreaks windows, or doors or door plates, or the walls of houses, roadrt or gardons, or dcstroyw foncoH ; (j.) heing a common |irostitute or night walkor, wandci's in tho fields, puhlic streets or highways, lanes or places of pnhlie meeting or gathering of people, and doe.s not give u satisfactory account of herself ; or (j.) 18 a keeper or Inmate of a disorderly house, bawdy-house or house of ill-fame, or house for the resort of prostitutes ; (/i.) is in the liahit of frequenting such houses and does not give a satisfactory account of hiiunelf or herself; or (I.) having no peaceable profession or. calling to maintain him- self by, for tho most part supports himself hy gaming or crime, or hy tho avails of prostitution. v.\(iKAvrr. gv| Rv.'rv l.ms,., „||,. „!• .liK..i'.lorly |m.|-m ,• vagrant is li,il,l.. oi, HiiMiiniiry coiiviHi-.u l..f..,v tw,. j.isii....sor tli.- |.,.a...., ton tiii.> iH.t ;'-7'' '"'^' Hrty,l.,lhi,.H ,„• to in.priMuMm.nl, with oiMvitl.,,,,! I.ani l.tl.uur, |,,f any Ion., iiof ..x.'o .,|i,„^ nix m .nth., ...• to hath. VVh.-.-.. ,1 vvoM.i,, was ,.o„vi..|,.l of h.i,,^ u n.mn.oi, |..'.)stit..l.. un.lol wa...h<i-ii,« in Iho |.i.l.li,. Mfocts a.„l n„f jrjvm^r a saiisthc torya.v.,„nt ..f h.i-.olt; th,- convirtin,, was hH.l ilh-^al, horaus,. ii .li.l not aiioK'' that tho wun,;i,. was ank..!. i,..!',,,,, h,i„^, „iU..„ „, who., Mh.. was hoinif tukon, to ,.i\v an ac-onnt of h..i-s..|C. ai.M it w.is h..i,| („,.|h..,- that a.. „li..iration -sh.. ;^;ivin^. „„ sutiHfacto.T ';''•■'""". '^"'' •"" '^'"'^^ ""^l any ,.,-iu,- .h.„. ,n1 was mi.!., upon 1. 01- to ^ivo an ufcoiiiii i.rhi'r.si.jf. (i ) VVh.'n a |.n>,son i. ,.ha.xo,| with v.ig.-an.y i„ Ihm..;. ul.lo to work un.l inaii.t.m. hinn.ir a.„l raniily an,l wiifnilv .vlusi,,^. .„. ....irioet- • nir t., ,1., HO, an ol.ii^Mtion t.. in:ii.,tain mnsl ho ostahlinho,! u-.iinsl '"" I""'- i>..stanuo, a man is not ho,.n,| to M,.|,,,..,.t his wife, who has loft htm ,m.l in livi..^. i., a.luito.-y; (2) no,- .an a ium-so,,, .•l.ur!,'o.l .iH ahovo, h. ..onvlHo.l if ho oTo.vs to taUo hack hi.n Whoiv a woman who, bMng .hH.i-fo.l hy ho.- h,.sh:in,l, and havin^. no moa..s of miiiuUiuuu^ ho.- ,-hil.|.-on. loft thuiu so that thoy hJ- canK.char^oabUUothoi,a,-iHh, it was hol.l that shu could not h. convictod, undortho Kngliwh Vag.-ant Act. 5 Uoo. IV, o. 83 s 4 (4 Ho.nK «ln...k in not an otlbnco undoi- cUmso (O ol' tlio ubovo Artich". Tho .)troneo consists in causing a distui-banco by boinir drunk. (5) "^ ° A licensed carter who, contrary to a city o,-dinance. loite.-s on he street near tho enti-ance of a hotel a.ul solicits passc.gers to hire his cab, but who does not ohslinict passengers, is not within clause (e) of tho above article, (tj) (1) R. V. Levecqiie. 30 U. C). Q. B. 509. (2) R. V. Flinton, 1 B. & Ad. 227. (3) Flaniiasfttii v. Bishop Wtfar.noiuli. 8 E. it- B. 451. (4) Peters V. Cowie, L. R. 2 Q. B. I). 131. (5) Ex parte Despatie, 9 L. N. 387; R. v. Daly, 24 V. L. J. l.-,7. Smith V. R. 4 M. L. R. 325 ; Bur. Dig, 188. i 672 PRACTICAL auiDE TO MAGISTRATES. VEXATIOUS ACTIONS. Sow |)|). 50-53, ante. WARElKtrSE RECEII'TS. Si>(' p. 550, ante. WEinnTS AND M^'.ASURES. Soo \\. S. ('., c. 104, 51 Vic, e. 25, unci 52 Vic. c. 17. WIFE OR HUSBAND. Theft by wife or husband from each other, wlioii living «epanito. (See Code, Art. 313). woRsniT'. HiSTURBiNo Public Worship. (See Code, Art. 173). Obstructinu Officiating Clekuy.man. (See Code, Art. 171). WoiNDlNO. Wounding; witli Intent to ifliirder. — Soe attempts TO MURDER by \v(»uiidirig, (Code, Art. 232 (hi), iit p. 5t)(i, ante.) %Voiiiidi]i{r ivitli Intent to ]?luiin. Kte. — Everyone is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life who, with intent to maim, disfigure (n* disable any person, or to do some other grievous bodily harm to any ])er8on, or with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person, unlawfully by t'ny means wounds or causes any grievous bodily harm to any person, or shoots at any person, or. by drawing a trigger, or in any other manner, attempts to discharge any kind of loaded arms at any person. (Code, Art. 241.) H'oundJU|^. — Kvery one is guilty of an indictable otlence and liable to three years' imi)risonment who unlawfully wounds or inflicts any grievous bodily harm »ij)on anj' other ]terson, either with or without aijy weapon or instrument. (Code, Art. 242.) Nhootiu|r at Her ]?luJeNty*M Te»sel8, and Wonnd- ing Publie OitieerM on lluty. — Every one is guilty of an indictable ottence and liable to fourteen years' imprisonment who wilfully — (a.) shoots at any vessel belonging to Her Majesty or in the ser- vice of Canada ; or (6.) maims or wounds any public officer engaged in the execution of his duty or any person acting in aid of such officer. (Code, Art. 243.) APPENDIX. THK EXTRADITJON ACT The law of Canjulaus to procedure in oxtnulition nmttors is con- tained in the Extradition Ant, II. S. C, c. 142, as amended and extended hy the 52 Vic, c. 3(J. The Act applies in the case of imy foreiirn >(tate with which there is, at or after the time of its coming into force, an extradition treat}', convention, or arrangement. (1{. S. V... c. U2. sec. .^.) All judges of the Superior Courts and of the County Courts of any province, and all commissioners. apj)ointed for ihe puri)ose in any province by the (lovernor in Council under the great seal ^f (^anada, by virtue of the act, are authorized to act judicially in extradition matters within the province, and they have, for^the purposes of the Act, all the ])ower8and juristliction of any judge or magistrate of the province, {lb., sec. 5.) KxtriulUioii from Caiiadii — AVhenever the Act applies, a judge may issue his warrant of ari-cst. to arrest a fugitive on a foreign wan-ant of arrest, or on an infortnation or complaint laid before him, ami on such evidence and after such ])rocce(lings as m his opinion would justify the issue of the warrant if fhe crime in question had been committed in Canada. And he shall forthwith send a report of the fact of the issue of the warrant, with certitied copies of the evidence and foreign warrant, information or com- plaint, to the JMinister of Justice. {lb., sec. 6.) A warrant issued under the Act may be executed in any part of Canada, as if originally i.ssued, or subsequently endorsed by a justice of the peace having jurisdiction in the place where executed.' (lb sec. 7.) The fugitive shall be brought before a judge, and the judge shall hear the case in the same manner, as nearly as may be, as if the <>74 PRACTICAL GUIDE T(» .MAOISTRATES. I'ugitivi' was lirou^lit bi'toro u justico of the pi'iuv flmi'i^cd with im in(lietal)lo ott'onoe coinmittod in ("uriiidu, rocoivo the ovidcnci! .»." any witness tendered to siiow the truth of the charge, or tlu^ fact of the conviction ; and also receive an}' evi<lence tendered to show tliat the crime in question is one of a political character, or that it iw, for any other reason, not an extradition crime, or tlnit tiie pro- ceedings arebeing tai<en with a view to prosecute or pnnisli him for an otVence of a iiolitical character, (/i., sec. !l.) Depositions taiven in a foreign state and copies thereof, and cer- tificates of or judicial documents stating the fact of conviction may be received in evidence provick'd su(di papers are dul}' authenti- cated as required by .section 1(( (jf the Act. If, in the case of a fugitive offender alleged to have been CONVIC- TEIJ of an extradition crime, such evidence is produced as would, according to the law of Canada, prove that he was so convicted, uud if. in the case of a fugitive accuskJj of an extradition crime, such evidence is jn'oduced as woiUd, according to the law of Canada, justify his committal for trial, if the crime had been committed in Canada, the judge shall issue his warrant for the committal of the fugitive to prison until sui-rendered to the foreign state, oi- dis- charged according to law ; but, otherwise, the judge shall ordei- him to be discharged. (lb., sec. 11.) If the judge commits a fugitive to prison he shall, on such com- mittal : (a.) inform him that he will not be surrendered until after the expiration of fifteen days, and that he has a right to apply for a writ of habeas corpus ; and, (6.) transmit to the Minister of Justice a certificate of the committal with a cop}' of all the evi- dence taken before him, not already so transmitted, and such report on the case as he thinks fit. (lb., sec 12.) The requisition for the fugitive's surrender is made to the Minis- ter of Justice by a consular offlcer of the foreign state resident at Ottawa, — or by any minister of that state communicating with the Minister of Justice through the diplomatic representative of Her Majesty in that state, — or, if neither of these modes is convenient, then in such other mode as is settled by arrangement. (lb., sec. 13.) v If the offence in question is of a political character or if the pro- ceedings are being taken with a view to jii-osecute or punish the AIM'ENniX. — THE EXTRADITION ACT. 675 I'ugilivo for nil ottbuccof a political cliuvaetov lu' siiall not 1)C liahlo lo 1)0 Hiirroiulorod. {lb., hoc. 14.) If the Minister of .Iiistici', at any timo. dotorminos — (a), that this ottVncL', in respect of which extradition ])roceediiigsarc boin^- taken, i.s of a political character, or (6) that the proceediiigH are lieing taken with a view to try or jmnish the fugitive for an offence of a polit- ical character, or (c) that the foreign state iloos not intend to niakn a re(iuisi1ion for surrender, he may refuse to make an order for surrender, or cancel any order made h)' him or aii}' warrant issued l»y a judge, and order the fugitive's di.seharge. {lb., sec. 15.) A fugitive shall not be surrendered until after the oxpii'ation of FiFTKEN DAy.s froTii liis committal, or, if a writ of habeas corpus is issued, until after the decision of the <;ourt remanding him. (lb., sec. l(i.) If a fugitive is not suri'endered and conveyed out of Canada within TWO months after his committal for surrender, or, — if a writ of habeas corpus is issued. — within two months after the decision of the lourt on such writ, any of the judges of the Superior (Jourts of the Province where such person is contined, having power to grant a habeas corpus, may, upon a])plication being made to him after reasonable notice to the Minister of .lustice. order the fugi- tive to be discharged, unless sufficient cause be shown against such discharge, (lb., sec. ID.) Section 1 of 52 Vie., c. 36, provides for the surrender, to a foi'eign state, of fugitive offenders, charged with or convicied of any of the crimes mentioned in the schedule to the Act, in case of there being no extradition treaty or arrangement with such foreign state or in case of there being, with such foreign state, an extradition ar- rangement which does not include the crimes mentioned in the schedule to the Act. Kxtrudition from Foreign Ntate. — A requisition for the surrender of a criminal who is a fugitive from Canada, and who is or is suspected to be in any foreign state, with which there is an extradition treaty, convention or arrangement, may be made by the Minister of Justice to a consular officer of that state resident at Ottawa, or to a Minister of Justice or any other minister of that state through the diplomatic representative of Her Majesty in that t)76 I'KACTICAI- (lUIDK Td M.\(11STUATE». Htuto, or if neitlior oftlumo modes is convonioiit. thon it\ such oHn-r mode as is settled liy arniiigement. (H. tS. C, e. 142, sec. 21.) Whenever any person aeeused or oonyieted of an extradition erime is surrendered by a foreii^n state in pursuanee of any extra- dition arrangement, sueii person shall not, until after he has been restored or has hud an o])i)ortunity of returning to the foreign state, be subject, in contravention ot any of tlie terms of the ai'- rangement, to any prosecution or punishment in Canada for any otheroti'ence committed prior to his surrender for which he shoulil not under the arrangement be prosecuted, {lb., sec. 23.) Political OftViloO. — An explosion caused by an Anarchist is not a jiolitical otlence ; but, to constitute a political otlen<e, there must, in connection therewith be two parties in the State, each trying to imjiose its own government on the other. (1) Kxtruditioii between <'niia«lu und tlie Uiiiteil !>»tateM — i.s regulated by the Ashbitrton Treaty.— uuuW between tireat Britain and the United States in 18-42. — l>y statutes passed t<) give that treaty etl'ect, and by a convention made between Great Britain and the United States in 1889-1890. The Aiihburton Treaty hixv, been extended by the convention of 1888-1890 HO as to make jjrovision for the extradition, between (rrcat Britain and the United States, of fugitive criminals, accused or convicted of any of the following crimes : — Murder. Piracy. Arson. Rohbery. Forgery ; Utterino ok P'oroekies. Mansi AUditTER when voluntary. COUNTERFEITIMI ; UtTERINU < 'orXTERFElT MoNEY. Kmhez/le.ment ; Larceny ; Receivino any money, valuable secuT'ity or other i)ro])erty knowing the same to have been em- bezzled, stolen or fraudulently obtained. (2) KRAin, by a bailee, banker, agent, factor, trustee, director, mem- ID In re Meunier, 10 R., Oct., (1804), 225. (2) Emuezzi-e-ment and L.\uct)NY are now included in "Theft." AI'I'ENDIX.— THE EXTIUDITION ACT. 677 bor ..,• „mcor ..f any company, made criminal by the laws „f both foun trios. PeR.IIRV ; SiHORNATtON OK PeRJLRV. i?Ai'E; Abduction; ("1111.1) Stealing; Kidnappincj. Bi;R(iLAHy; lIoi;sKBKKAKIN() ; SlIOPBREAKINd. , * Piracy by the law of nations. ' v* IJEVOI.T or Conspiracy to Revolt by two or num. persons on b.mrd a ship on the high was a-ainst the authority of the master- WR0N0FI;LLY .SINKINO or nESTIlOYINO A VESSEL AT SEA ; or ATTEMPT- INO to do so; ASSAULTS ON »,.AHi. A Sill,' on the higii seas with INTENT to do grievous bodily harm. Cri-mes am. ()kkence.s against the laws of both countries for the supjire-ssiou of slavery and slave tradino. Forms IN TMK Second Schedule OK THE Extradition Act. fVarrdiit of Apprehension. To wit : ' " . ., . :. .>■ To all and each of the constables of WHER^^As it has been shown to the un.lersigned. a Judo-e under Ihe Lxiradition Act " that late of is accused [or. coHHCte,^ of the crime of . >, ;. ^vithin the Jurisdiction of This is therefore to command you in Mer Mi.jesty's name forth- with to apprehend the said and to bring him before me or some other Judge uuiler the said Act to be further dealt witli accoi-ding to law for which this shall be your warrant. <JlVEN under my iumd and seal at ■ , . ; ^•"y o^' A. 1). 181» . " " this WARRANT 01' CO.MMITTAL. To wit '^^ one of the constables of a,i,l to the keeper of the at 078 I'RAPTirAI, OUtDK Til MAntSTRATES. V He it iiKMK.MHKUEi) lliiil oil tliis ' day oC , in tlu' your . lit , is lirou^'iit bofoiv 1110. n ,lii(lL,'f tiiidcr " Tlie, Extradition Act," , wlio has liwii apprclii'iKk-d uiidcr (lio said Act, to be dealt with according to hiw ; and I'orasinuch us f liavo detornunod tlmt ho should lie sunrndort'd in puvsiianco of tho sai<l Act, on the ifroiind of his lu'ing uccusimI [or ronvictedl^ of the crime of within the jurisdiction of This is therefore to command you, tlie wiid c(instui)le, in Her Mujesty's name, forthwith to convey and deliver tho suid into the custody of the keeper, of the at , and you the said keeper, to receive the said Given under my hand and seal at thi*. day of . A. D. 18!l . Order of Minister of Justice fur Surrendi r. To the keeper of the at ami to Whereas , late of , accused [or convicted'] of the crime of within the jurisdiction of , Avas delivered into tho custody of you, the keeper of the at , by warrant dated , pursuant to '' 1 he Eitr adit ion Act." Now, I do hereb}', in pursuance of the said Act, order you, the keeper, to deliver tho said into the custody of the said , and I command you, the said ' , to receive the said into your custody and to convey him within the jurisdiction of tho said , and there place him in the custody of any person or persons (or of ) appointed by the said to receive him : for which this shall be your warrant. Given under the hand and seal of the undersigned Minister of Justice of Canada, this day of A. D. 189 . FUGITIVE OFFENDEES ACT. The Fugitive Offenders Act applies to tho following ott'encos, namely : Treason, Piracy, and every otfenco which is, for tho time being punishable, in the part of Her Majesty's dominions in AI'I'ENniX. — FUOITtVK OKFKNDKHH A<"T. <I7!> whii'li it was I'oimiiitlctl, I'illu'i- on iiidiftmi'iit or iiitonnai'nii, liy iinitrisdiiiiK'Ht witli hard labour tor u tenii of twki.ve months or mori'. or by any yiratcr |miiislimoiit ; and tlio Act applies also, so far as is consistent witli the tenor tlierc'of to any person convicted liy a court in any pai't of Her Majesty's dominions of an otVence coniinitteil in Her Majesty's dominions or elsewliere. who is unlaw- fully at lar,ii,'e hefore the exi>iration of Ids sentence, in iikt- manner as it apjilies to a jierson accused of tlie like otfence committed in the part of Her .Majesty's domiiuons in whi(di su(di person was convicted. ( l{. S. ('., c. ]V,l sec. ;{.) Whenever a person accused of haviiiij; committed an otl'ence (to whicii the Act apiilies), in any |iart of llei- .^^aJesty's dominions outside (d' Canada, has left that part, such per.son, as a fugitive from that jiart. if found in Canada, shall he liable to lie appro- bonded and roturnotl to tho jxirt from whidj ho is u fugitive ; and be may be so a]>prehende(i under an indorsed warrant or a provi- sional warrant. {lb., sec. 4.) Whenever a warrant has been issued in a |>art of ller AfaJesty's dominions for tho ai)prehensiou of a fugitive from tiuit part who is. or is suspected to bi', in or on the way to Canada, the Governor- (leiieral or a Judge of a court, if satisfied that t lie warrant was issued by some person having lawful authority to issue the same, may indorse such warrant, and the warrant so indorsed shall bo a sutticient authority to apprehend the fugitive in Canada and bring him before a magistrate, (ft., sec. 5.) A magistrate in Canada may issue u provisional warrant for the apprehension of ii fugitive who is or is suspected of being in or on his way to Canada, on such infornuition and under sucli cir- cumstances as would, in his opinion, Justify the issue of a warrant if the otfence of which the fugitive is accused had been committed within his Jurisdiction ; and such warrant nuiy bo backed and executed accordingly. (76., sec. (J.) A magistrate issuing a provisional warrant must forthwith send a report of the issue, together with the informalion or a certified copy thoi'eof, to the Governor-General ; and the Govornor-Genei'al may, if he thinks tit, discharge tho person apprehended under such warrant, {lb.) <iS(l IMIACTICAI, UI'IDK Tn MAdlSTItATKS. A fii^^itivi' wlii'ii iipprclu'iidnl mIiuII bo l)n)nglit iKtf'oiv a miigiM (rate, wild, Miilpjt'cl tn tlu' pfovisioiiM of tlic Act, ^'liall lii'ar tlic casu ill iIh' saiiio inaiiiii'i' ami liavc \\\v. saiiui Jurisdictinii ami powers, as nearly as may Ik', iiieludiiig the power to iviiiaiKi and udmit to Itail, aH ii' llie fugitive was idiarged with an otlence comniilted within his iiifisdiction. (//>., see. 7, Huhsec. 1.) Wheiievei' the iiiiigist rate eohiniits Ihi' fiigitis'e to prison, he must infonii hini that he will not be siiri'eiidei'ed until after the expiration of vii-tke.n hays, ami that ho has a right to apply tor a writ of habeas corjius or otiier like process. (/6., sec. 7. siibsee. 3.) \ fiigitivo appndmmied on a provisional warrant, may from time to time be remanded for siudi rea.soiialde time, not exceeding seven days at any one time, as seems re(|uisite for the jiroduction of an endorsed warrant, (/t., sec. 7, subsoc. 4.) I'p"'" the expiration of KtKTKKN DAVs after tlu; fugitive's com- mittal to prison lo await his return, or. (if a writ of /tuAci/s co/'/jf/^ or other liUe proci'.ss has been issued with roforoiice to him), after the tinal decision of the court in the case, tiie (rovernor (ieneral by wai-rant under his hand, if ho thinks it Just, may order the fugitive to be returnetl to tlu^ ]iai't of Ilei- .Maji'stys dominions from which he is a fugitive, {lb., sec .S.) If a fugitive committi'd to prison to await his return is not returned out of Canada within two months after Jiis committal the court, ujion ap]»lication, by or on behalf of tho fugitive after reas- onable notice to the ( Jovornor-Oeneral, may, unless cause is sliown, to the contrary, order the fugitive to be discharged, {lb., sec. 9.) ^iimior of Ketiirii of Fii}^iii%<'. — Whetievor a fugi- tive or prisoner is authorized to be returned to any part of Jlor Majesty's dominions in jnirsuancc of this Act, such fugitive or prisoner may be sent thither in any ship registoretl in Canada or belonging to the Government of (!ana(bi : 2. The (rovornor-denoral, for the purpose aforesaid, may. hy the warrant for the return of the fugitive, order the master of any ship registered in Canada, bound to the said part of IFer Majesty's dom- inions, to receive such fugitive or prisoner, and atford a pas.sage and subsistence during the voyage to him, and to the jierson hav- ing him in custody, and to tlie witnesses ; but such master shall API'ENDIX.— KIMltTIVE OKPEMiKKS ACT, 681 iidl lie ri'iiiiiri'il In receive iiinri' tlian oim lii|(ilivf or prisoner I'm' I'vcry luiinlrcil tons of liis nliip's ri'^iMtert'd loiiiiiiijo. oi- ninrc timii one witiH'SH lor ovory ril'ly Ions of such tonnan*' : ;j. Tlic (lovcrnor (icniTiil slinll ciiusc fo In- indorsed upon tlm iigrt'cmcMt of (he sliip sucii pai'ticMliii's wilh respect to any fuirilive prisoner or witness sent in iiei-. as tlie MiniHter of Marine and Fish- erios, from lime to time, rcipiires ; 4. I'lvei'v smdi mast<'r shall, on his ship's arrival in tiie said jiarl of Her Majesty s dominions, cause sncdi fuij;ilive or prisoner, if he is not ill tile custody of luiy person, to ho t^iveii into the custody of .s(»iiio courttahlo tliorc to ho dealt with according to law. 5. Kvery master who tails, on payment or lender of a reasonahlo ainnunt for o.Vjieiises, to comply with an order made in pursuance of this section, or to cause a fuifitive or prLsouer committed to his charn'c to he y;iven into custody as re(|uired hy this section, shall he liahle, on summary conviction, to a penalty not exceediiiir two hundred dollars, (fb,. .sec. 15.) I'iVidoiK'O. — A iua;.C'^>'"it^' "H'.V 'iil<i' ile|>osi(ioiis for the pur- poses of this Act. in the ah.seiiee of a person accu.sed of an otfenco, in liUe manner as Ik- inin'ht take the same if such person was present and accused of an otfenco hefore him. (76., roc. 16.) Beiiositions whether taken in the al)seiice of the futjitive or otherwise and copies thereof, and otiicial certiticates of, or judicial documents stating facts, may. if duly authontieatcd, he received in evidence in proceeding.s under this Act. (//a, sec. 17.) Warrants and depositions and copies thereid'and ollieial certificates of or judicial documeiit.s stating facts shall ho deemed duly aul lien- ticrtted for the jiurpo.sos of the Act, if they are authenticated in nuuiner provided, for the time heing hy law. or if they j)ur|t()rt to he signed, hy or authenticated hy the signature of a judge, inagis- trute, or oflicer of the part of Her .Majesty's dominions in which the same are issued, taken, or made and are authenticated either V)y the oath of some witness or the public seal of a British jtossossion or of a Colonial secretary or of some secretary or minister adminis- tering a dejiartnient of the government of a British possession ; and all courts and magistrates are required to take judicial notice of every such seal and admit without furthei- proof the documents authenticated by it. (76., 18.) 6fl2 I'RAPTICAIi (liriDK TO MAdlSTIlATEH. AN ACT I'rirriiKi,' to a.\ii:m> tiik cin.MiNAii CODK, 1,S!I2. (57-r)S \'ic. c. b^^ * I. 'I'lic Criminal Oode, iSiCJ, Im lioivby uiuondi-d in tlic iiiiimicr set turili in tin- tollnwitiix sclu-diilc* : — SCilKDriJv . Si'itiitii (I."), imriiKrii|il> </> Hy insctliiiK ariiT tin- word " count ricH " in the llllli line till' worii " or." Sfclioii 111? My .siil)HtitiitiiiK in tin- l'"rcncii vci'Mion for llu^ word "Jen" in llii' tontli linu tin; word "parlM," Socllon 2(l7 liy iuldin)^ iit tlii' end lliurt'of I lie roDowinK '^nl)- section : " 'd. 'I'lic cxprcMsion ■ |inl)lic place ' In this sec- tion includes iiiiy open place to winch t he puhlic have or are permitted to luive aecuHs iind any place of puhlic resort." Section 2(W By sirikinK "»t llii' follow injx words in the Hcconil and lliird lines: " he fore two Justices of the peace." Section 2(i;{. paragrapli ('/». Hy inserting after the word " seizure " In the fourtli liiu' the word "or." Sect ion Ulii, paragraph (b).. By adding at I lie end I hereof t lu' wonl " or." Section ."vld By MtrikiuKont tlie words " I 'art XI. I'Iscapes and Rescues ; any of the sections in this part. ' Section .TO Uy inserting after the word "gandng" in the I twenty-third line of suhHcctioii one the words * I "or lietting." dO" By inserting after the woi'd "gandng"' in the ninth line of sul)Hection two the words "or ' l)etling." , ob By inserting aft<'r the word " gandng-houMe " in the sixth line of sulisection three the words " or any tahlcs and instruments of hetting so seized ■ ■ • in any iiiace used as a connnon betting-house." Section 651 By adding at the end thereof, an subsection •'>, the I following:— I ".5. Whenever, in the province of Quebec, it has been decided by competent authority tluit no term of tlie Court of Queen's Bench, holding crindnal jileas, is to be held, at the appointed time, in any district in the naid province witlun which a term of the said court should be then held, 8,ny person charged with an indictable AI'I'K.NDIX. mi Scrliiin (MI2. Si'ctidli M(KI, ""••"U'.; wlios,. (rial mIh.uI.I I.v huv l.r h.'l.l h, tl,,. N..M . iHirlrt. may in i|„. ,„„„„.■>■ I, 'n'i M . I ■ . '•'•'•<l''l Willi III SOI,,., oil,,.,. ,|,sl,i,.| w|,|„„' ,, N. I. |,iovli„... Mu, ..Vll,..,.o,i,.t,„.J,„|K! , » "" "I"' l"'':^'" ^ ••"iil„ii„..| h, (his se,.t|o„ si I ol'luinliiK ,1 ,.|i,ti,K.. of v..,i,i,. u.s alo,...s„l,l," "follllwl','^':' ""' '■'"' ""''■""'• "' ^"'•^'■'••io" -'. <l'" "L'. N,>lwill,Mhl,HliiiKUI,.vlHW, l,s„K,.o|.,.,lslo„i «> t I.. ,.o„t|.,in, .s,.v,.„ unuui .i„,o,N. i„,st,.u y..|v..„s l,..,.,.,„fon. ,v il,.,|H ,i„.; hill , u ■<>v„i.... u|,..r,. th.. ,,„.i,.l of >,n„Hl ji.n.rH is,,',^,, i. I, si, .11 „o| ,,,„„. Miio for,.,. „,„i| a ,hivto l„. "" '•'•>■• IK' <i-v..|i,„rhy his ,.,.,„.h,i„atio," My (uldiiiK Hi II,,' <.ii(l ihi.n.of tl,.. f.,1 l>" illK |,|.|| Section H7I Section 872, sulwc imi'iiKrai)!, Ui} . ctlon one, Section H72, subsc ction one. Section 884. Section 92H. l.)vi.l,..|, ,,,s ,;'n,y-i\s the |„..,v|„e,.s „f ()„ "•„., Nova Scotiau,,.! \..«. Hnii,swi,.|<, thai i| • ...von.,;,, ii, Coniu.ii may f,„,., linuV,.' | . ' em .u T ""''■'■ '•'''* "'■'■''"" '"' VnynhU' to tl..' •0,1 ity (r.-asiii;..,. |,„. ..ounty ,,„r,,os,.H, or anv I';; ■ ""I ll.ereol h.. pai.l toan ■ imu i-i,,,, „ ■ | ",| authority^ whi,.h wholly or in part h.., rs t ,.. •" "■!i>...N .,f llie adiiiinistrati ,( j„sti,... n,,.!,.,. <•- imit. ..rthal the Ma.iie he a ppli... i,, • ' "•••m'.."n..|- .l..e,„..,| h,.st a.lapl..'fl to s..e,.,v i s line it.limnistratioii of sii,.|, pr,, visions." H.y slrikiiiK out •• I (K)" an.l suhstitntiiiK " 1.50" in 111.' (irst item ol ll,e lariU'of eonstahles' fe.ls, and H.yHt..iki.,Koul tl,.. item niunhe,,.,! 7 in the sai.l Ian ami s„hst itntiiiK the followjnji : •i. AII(.|,.li,i|Lc.i„sric,.M on trial, for .-aeh ,lav iKM.eHsari y ...nploy „ ,„„. „, ,„„,,. ^ > •■iiKaKed l,.ss tlian fonr hours, ><\ (N, " /. .M tending Just ices on trial, for eaeh <hiv nec-ssariiy em|.|oy..d in one or mor.- ..a.s..s, w i\ enKiiK..,! more than four hours, .lKl.r,0." ' ' By strikinK out the followinK wor.ls in the tilth s .xth and sev..n|h lines : " in tl,e..ommoi, ja i, ,: other pri.son of the lerritorhil .livision fo^ hi •, the justice i.s then iieiinK." »"iia Hy strikh'K out the followinK words in the thh-.I 1 fourlJ, Itm.s: •' i„ ,he common jail or o le,' prison of the said territorial division." By fnsertii.K after th.; word "saine" in the thirrf ne^the words " whether sucli notice has I •'. I properly Ki\ en or not." BymldiiiKat the end of subsection 2 thereof tlie following paragraphs :— ^"^ . "(f/.) Ihe cognizor shall be liable to eoereiv« am'l ciX'""' '"'■ '"" P**-^"""* "^ tl"- JudgiSn? 44 -684 IMiACTICAI. (»IMI»K TO MAOIHTKATKH. Section 0:211 Sclit'diilc 2. Schecluti; 2. "{!■,) Wlll'll Mllllll'll'llt ({llllllx mill cIlltltl'lM, liiniU III' triii'iiii'iilK niiiiiiii III' I'liiiiiil III HitllMfy I III' ,|iiiIkiiii>iiI iikiiIiihI II ^ll^l|l/.l>^ ami I lir siiiiii- In (■(■rlllli'il III llii' I'l'hit'ii III till- writ iif cM'i iilliiii or ii|i|ii-Mi'M liy llii> i'i'|iiii'i iif iIIhI I lliiiliiiii, u win mill III' riiiiiiiiil iiii'Ml Miiilir<<xi'il III till' hIiitIII' iiF t III- 'llstrll'l IIIM> ImsIH' II|MI|I |I|I> lllll III |ini'<'l|M' • if till' Altiii'iii'v (ii'iH'iiil, or of liny prisun iln'ri-- to iiiitliiii'lxi'd III ui'itliiK In liliii, mill >iii'li wiir- I'linl nIiiiII III' uiitliiii'it \ lo llii' sliiTiir III luUi' Into I'llMtitiiy till' liiiily iiC I III' riiKiii/or hii In ili't'milt anil to liiil^i- lilin in tlic Miniiiinn jull nl' llii' ilU- trict iiiilil sill iHl'arl inn Ih iniulr, or iiiilil lliu court wlilrli Inmiii'iI micIi wiirrmit, il|iiin rmiti) hIiowii 114 lu'ii'lnutlrr nii'iiliiini'il, inaki'H mi iirili'r In lilt' I'lisi' mill siii'li iirdi'i' Iiiih i.i'i'n fully ('oin- (tlil'li w illl. "(''.) Siicli NMiiraiit mIiiiII Itf ri'lnrni'il liy llic .slii'i'lir on till' liny on \vlii<'li it In niiuli' rt'tiirn- iilili- anil Illl' Hlifrlll' hIiuII stair in IiIn ri*lurn what has lici'ii iloni' in cxctnl ion tlii'ri-of, "(f/.lOii iM'lillon of Illl' I'OKiii/or, of wliii'li not li'i' Nliall III' ^;i\ rii to lln- rli'rU of t lii' ("rown of til)' iliHlrirt. lilt' t'oiirt may lnt|iiirf into tin- i ir- ('Uinslaiiffs of till' rasi' ami may in its ilism'tion ortli'i' ilif ilisi'liarut' of tlif amoiinl for whlrli lit> Im lialili' or niiiUt' hihIi onlt'r with rt'.spt'cl tlit'ri'lo mitl III his imiirisoiimi'iii as may apiirai .jiist , anil Hiii'h ortlfr shall !»• t'arrlfti out liy tlif Mlit'riH'." liy atlilin^ al tlii' emi of NuhNi'i'lion :i thi'i-t'of the followln)^ pariivrrajih : "(/<.) 'I'hf foKiiizor for tlif rt'fovt'ry of ihi' JuilKnit'iil in any siirh ai'llon hIimII lit' llalilr to coert'ivt' iniprisonmt'iit in tlif saiiif maniifr iis a Nurfty is In liic t'lisf of .jinllfial siiri'tyship in t'lvil mattii'.s." iHy striking f>nl ":«!" anil siilistiliiliiiK "IITi," in \\w I llfth lint', as tilt' tliaplfi' of tin' Kcvist'tl Sliilutfs rt'.spt'ftiiiK till' I'oMtal St'r\ iff. |ny striking out tin- llgui'c "0" in the fourth line from till' f ml. AIM'KNI»I.\, 686 AX ACT I{i:sr>K<TI.V<l Till.; AIMJKST, T|{IAL AND I.MI'IflSoNMKNT (.F V( .ITII IM' I, OFFKX DMWs. (57- '>H \ic., ,.|,i,|.. rts.) I. SoHion (Iv.. In.h,|.v,| ,uhI (iCy nC Th. rnminal Ojde, IM'O i., l.-.vlo iv|H''«l'"l aiMl IIh. ln||ovvi.,i;H,..tin„ .Ml.sf i( „h.,| (|n.,vf„r T' " ■' .1«0. Tl... irials uC vm,,..,^ |M.,..,ns uppaivntly un.|..r il... auo of MM...... y..ar.. shall .al<.. ,,la.... .i,!...,., ,.„l.|i..i,v ,„„l .s..,,a,.aU.7v ;'.'"' "';"■;' "■;•":""• "•; •■'•"--• ™ ..,..,„;, an,i a. s„i,aMo HUM'S t., Ik. .I..s,;r„,„,.,| a.Hl a|.iHm,t,.,| |„r llu.l |.,.r|M.s...'' a. V.M.r.K pom.ns a|.im,vi,(|y „n.l..i- ilu, a^'.. ..f sixi,...,, v...,rs will) ar.. : — .' " (".) un'.\st..(l ii|i.iii any warrant ; .ir ;''•) ';'->.-nit...,l ,„,.Ms,.„|y „ „.y ,,„,.„„,, i.,o|i,ni„H..y on.iuiry iiiloaclmrgo lorai, iii.lictal.loom'nco ; .,r (;•.) .■oMum.t..,! t.> .•usi.Kly at any s.a.,.. ..r a trial. ..id.cr for an "."'.""'''" """'"'^^ '»'• ♦■'"• "" <>'»'""••" Pm.ishal.l. sum.nary ..on- on .■onnnitt.Ml t.. nis y afU-r sud, (rial. ImU L.-foro impriHon- Hl.all !..._ kc.,,| i„ ,,.s,.„|y s,.,.arat., Iron. ..I.!..,- p,.,.so.,.s ..|,a,w.l ^^" ' "'■"-'">;"• <'in;>H*- an.l s..pa,-ato innn all porH.,„s un,lo,-goTn« s.'..l.-n..c.s,,( Mnp...s.,nm..nl,an.l shall not h. ......fine.l i,. the look ups .>,- p.,lK.o stati.„..s with ..l.l.u. |K.,.sons chur,..,l with criminal otfonces or with oi-ilinary (•.•iinii.als. ». Itany ..hiki. upp(^«rii..i. t.) tho conrt or justico hofo.... whom tlio clnld iHtnod to bo nndor tho a.tjoof fourtcn years, is oonvioted in the pr.n'ineo of Ontu.-io of any otfbnce against the huv of ' amuiu, whetlxM. indictable or p.miHhal.le on s.unma.y convietion such court or juHtico, instead of senteucing tho child to any imin-j- Honment provided bylaw i., such ca.se, may onlor that the chil.l «l.all becomtnittcd to tho charge of any homo for .lestitule and 686 PRACTICAL aUIDE To MAOISTRATES, noglofled childivii, or to tlio t'Imrgr <»!' any cliildiviiH aid society duly ()i'ii;aiii/A'd and a|)|>rovi'd by the Lioiiti'iianl-(J()Vori>or of Ontario in ("onncil, or to any cttrtitiod industrial srliool. 4* Whenever in llus province of Ontario, an information or coni|»laint is laid or made against any lioy tinder the age of twelve years, or girl under the age of ihii'teen years, for iIk' eonimissiou of any olfenee against the law of Caniuiii, whetlier indictable or punishable oii summary conviction, the coui-t or Justice! seized thereof shall give notice iheri'of in writing to tJie executive oHicer of the children's aid society, it there be one in the county, and shall allow him opportunity to investigate the charges made, and may also notify the parents of tlie child, or either of tlu-ni, or other person apparently interested in tlu^ welfare of the (duld. 2. The court or justice may advise and counsel with the said officer and with the j)arcutsor such other person, and may consider any report made b)' the said officer upon the charges. 3. If. after such consultation and advice, and upon consideration of any report so made, and aflei- hearing the matter of information or complaint, the court or justice is of ()))inion that the public interest and the welfare of the child will bi- la'st served thereby, then, instead of committing liie child for trial, or sentencing the child, as the casi' uuiy be, the court or justice nniy, by order: — (a.) authorize the said officer to take the child and, under the provisions of the law of Ontario, bind thechild out to some suitable person until the child has attained the age of 21 years, or any le-ss age ; or (6.) [)lace the child out in some approved foster-home ; or (c.) impose a tine not exceeding ten dollars; or (<1) suspend sentence for a detinite period or for an indelinite period ; or (e.) if the child has been found guilty of the ottence charged or is shown to be wilfully waywartl and unmanageable, commit the child to a certified industrial school, or to the provincial reformatory for boys, or to the refuge for girls, as the case may be, and in such cases, the report of the said officer shall be attached to the warrant of commitment. APPENDIX. (587 «. Whenovop iin order has boon nuulo utidor oitlior of 1 he two .^oc-lions next i)roee<lin,ir. the child may thoreaftor be dealt witli under tbo law of the i)rovii,oe of Ontario, in the same manner, in all respects, as if huoI. order had been lawfully made in respect of a proceeding inntituted under authority of a statute of the province of Ontario. «. No Protestant child dealt with under this Act, shall bo com- mitted to the care of any ifoman Catholic children's aid society, or be placed in any Roman Catholic family as its foster-liome ; nor shall any Koman Catholic child dealt with under this Act, be com- mitted to the care of any F'rotestant children's aid society, or be placed in any Protestant family as its foster-home. But this section shall not apply to the care of children in a temporary home or shelter, established under the Act of Ontario, fifty-six Victoria, chapter forty-five, intituled An Act for the Prevention of Cruelty to, and better Protection of, Children, in a municipality in which there is but one children's aid society. 088 PRACTICAL UUIDE To M AOISTKATKS. AN ACT IJKSPKCTINiJ TIIK ('(-STODY OF .lUVKNILK OFFHXDKIJS, XKW MI{l'NSWI("K. (57-5S Vu-., c. 5!».) 1. ('lia|>tt,'r tliii'ly-tliroo ol'tlic SltiHiti's of iSiK}, intituled An Art relating to the rustoc/i/ of juvenile offent/ers in the province of New Brun- swick, is lii'irhy iiiiu'iKlod by adding to it llic following softion : — " lO. Tlio Governor (itMicral liy wiirrant under his hand may at ail}' time in his disorotlon, on the application of the Attorney (icnei-al of the ])roviiice of Xew Brunswick, cause any hoy who is imprisoned in the Dorchester I'enilenliary. or in any jail in that ]irovince. for an offence within the law of Canada, and who is certified hy any judge of tlie Supi'emc Court or of any County Court to have been, in the opinion of such Judge, at tlietime of his trial uniler the age of tifteen years, to lie transferred to the Hoys' Industi'ial Home in the jirovince. foi- the I'l'nniinder of his tt'rin of imprisonment and for .such further term in addition thereto as tlie (iovernor (ieneral. on the report and recommendation of such judge, deems exi)edient ; provided that the whole term of impri- sonment shall not exceed five years from the comnu'nci'ment of tlie imprisonment in such j)enitentiary or jail." GENERAL INDEX. ABANDOXMEXT l'.\(ii; Of Appcnl :MW Of t;liil(l 42(1 AHATKAIKNT of Niiisiuicc. .. , (ilHI AHDlirnON (Sec Kli/nfi/i- jiiiHj.) 127, I'M AHKTTORS (i2 ABOMTION (if (list iixl ion Ih- Iwccii fcldiiy iiiul iiiisdr- niciiiior ,s(l Of tlii> terms lai'C'env, I'lii- hi'zzU'iiicnl, etc (Ki'i ABOMIN'AHLK CRIME 4.(1 AliOirnON i:)l. i:t2 Killing unborn child V.VJ. ABHOAD. Brinjiing coining in- slrnnifnts from 511 BrinKin.n CMiunloifcif nioncv from '. 510 BrinjiinK stolen property from (HW ACCKLEKATION of (Icntli.... 503 ACCESSORIES 5S-(i5 ACCIDENTAL HOMICIDE 5()4 ACCIDENTS OX SHIPS. Pri-- vention of (i54 ACCOMPLICE, Evidence of.. . 523 ACCUSED, ArraiKnment of 2(«t. 2iM), 32!) Discharge of 220, 3!)4 Insimity of 570, 577 May cull witnesses at prelimi- nary en<|niry 210 May make udmiissionK at trial 525 May testify 204 Speedy trial of 274 Statciiient of 212, 213, 237 ACCUSIXO of Crime (See Thriuls.) 0()5 ACQUITTAL, Vxv.v: A har to new proceedings. 204, ;«I4 330, 310 On ground of iii.sanity ,577 Af'TIOXS against persons ad ministei'ing criminal law . 30-40, ">0-53 Compounding penal 501 AD.IOURXMKXT of prelimi- nary en(|uiry 103, 1!M> Of speeily trial 27!> Of summary trial 320 AlUUDICATIOX by .lustice on summary trial ;j.31 Minute of ;);j;j ADMINISTERING drugs, poi- son, etc 4n;5. Oaths \N ithont authority ! I'ldawful oaths .". .43,5, ADMIXISTERING THE OATH Modes of 205, ADMIRALTY .HRISDIC- TION 72-70, 77, KHi, ADMISSIOXS (See Covf,>i- HKIHS) May he made by accused at trial ADULTERATION 434 4.37 430 201) 107 213 525 .538 437 ADULTERY, Conspiracy to in- duce a woman to conuiiit, . . A D V E R T I S I X G counterfeit money 4;j8 ADVERTISING obscene drugs. 4:18 ADVERTISIXG reward for re- turn of stolen |M-operty 502 ADVERTISEMEXTS, etc., re- sembling bank notes 430 AFFIRMATIOX instead of oath 20.5, ':0« 1690 I'RACTICAI, (lUIDK To .MAOISTKATKS. AFFUAY Paiik .. 440 ACJKNCY 140 AGKNT, TiK'ft by 442 444 ACCKAVATKD ASSAULTS 4(11 AGGI{KSSIONS H Y FOHKKiX- EUS (Sff Ijcryhiff War). . 0()5 AGRKUI/n'RAL MA- CIIINFS, UamaKing • 023, (124 AIDKRS AXl) ABKTTOUS .5H, «2 ALI.KUIANCK 444 AMKNDMENT, Powers of ... . 279 ANIMALS, capable of being stolen ((.lO KillinK. maiming or injuring. 444 Theft of 445 {See Cctttlr.) (See Cruelty to Animn's.) APPEAL from summary con- viction or order 350 Conditions of ;i51, 1153 On matters of form ;i54 Proceedings on 353 Judgment to be on merits. . . . 354 AI)andonment of . . 363 APPEARANCE before Justice. --Compelling 101 Waives summons 190 APPENDIX-Extradition Act.. 674 Fugitive Ofl'ender's Act 678 An Act amending the Crimi- nal Code 682 Acts as to Juvenile Otienders. (Wo -688 APPOINTMENT of Justices of the Peace 4 Of Police Magistrates 14-18 APPREHENSION (See Arrest). AQUEDUCT, Damage to 62:1 ARMS (See Offensive Weapons). ARMY AND NAVY 446 ARRAIGNMENT for speedy trial 269 For summary trial of indict- able ofl'ence 290 In summary trial of non-in- dictable otfence 329 AliREST P.\(JK (.sVe .Siniiwdrt/ A rrt;it). ARSON 45(1 ARTICLES OF THE PEACE. 411) ASPORTATION (See T/ieJt). ASS A I ■ LT defined 455 Srlf-(U'fenc(^ against 457 Prevention of 45H Common 461 A.'gravated 461 Occasioning bodily harm 462 Indecent 462, 4(W On ( he Queen 465 ASSEMHLIES, Ur.lawful. . 480, 482 ASSERTING RIGHT to house or land 460 ATTEMPTS 465, 468 ATTORN E Y-G EN ERA L, Con - sent of, ri'(iuired for certain pro.seeutions. 77, 78 BAC"KING warrants . 115, 139, 194, 314 HAIL, Rule as to 224 After committal 226 After election of jury trial 279 By Superior Court 227 Arrest of i)erson under 228 BANK, Assuming the title of. . 469, 470 False Bank Reports 469 BANK CLERK. Issuing false dividend warrants 470 BANKERS, Giving fraudulent preferences 469 BANK NOTES, Printing adver- tisements, business cards, etc., in the likeness of. ... . 4S\) BANK OFFICIALS, Thefts by. 469 BATHING, In public 573 BATTERY, (See As.mult)... . .. 455 BAWDY HOUSE 470 BESETTING, (See Intimida- tion) 581 BESTIALITY, (See Af>omin- able Crime) 431 OENERAL HCTTlN(i AND I'OOI.- 1>A(ii.; SKLMNC 47H HKTTINC; IIOUSK 471 BIAS, (See Interest) 25 BIGAMY 471-478 BIUTII, Conceahnent of 4i)K BLACKMAIL, (See Thrvats)... 6fl4-(«10 BLASPHEMY 47H BODILY INJURY 47B BODY SNATCHING 515, 51(i BOUNDAKIES, Injuries to. .. . «()5 BOXING, (See PrizeFighting). BRAHMIN Mode of Swearing 207 BREACH OF CONTRACT 508 BREACH OF TRUST 486 BREAKING PRISON 522 BRIBERY AND CORRUl'- TION, At elections 480 Judicial 487 (See Corrujdion). BRIDGES, Damage to «2;i BROTHEL, (See Bawdy House) BURGLARY 488 404 BURIED BODY, Digging up. . . 515, 510 BUTTERINE. Manufacture or . sale, prohibited 540 CANNED GOODS, Stamping and Labelling, 404 False Labelling 404 CAPACITY FOR CRIME 405 CARELESSNESS, (See Negli- gence) (i20, 627 CARNAL KNOWLEDGE 044 CASE, (See Reserving questions of law) 277, ;«W, 307 INDEX. (;i)l CATTLE l'A,i|.; 405 CLAUSING dangerous expIoHidns 5211 CAUTION to dcfendani after examination of wit nesses for prosecution 211, 212 CERTII-'ICATE of Clerk of the Peace, when conviction (|uaslie(l on appeal 352 CERTIORARI \m\ 350 CHALLENGE to flght 400 CHAMELEONS, are not domes- tic animals 513 CHASTISEMENT, (See IHscij). line) ,. 518 CHEATING at play 40fl CHILD, Abandonment of 420 Carnal Knowledge of 400 Causing death of, by frighten- iiiK 407 Stealing 407 CHILDBIRTH, Concealment of 498 Neglecting to obtain assist- ance in 498 CHINESE Inunigration 408, 409 Oath 207 CIVIL REMEDY' not suspended 104 CLERGYMAN, Obstructing.. 672 CLIPPING COIN 510 COCKPIT, Keeping 515 COERCION, (See Compulsion). Sm COIN, Offences respecting. . 509-512 COMBINATION in restraint of trade 500 (See Trade Union) COMMISSION to examine sick witness 10(5 To examine witness out of Canada 198 COMMITTAL for trial 221 J^'or extradition 074, 077, 078 COMMITMENT For contempt.. .30, 30, 108, 100, 375 0!1i P11ACTI(!.VI, (iriDE TO MAinSTK \TKS. lOMMIT.MKNT l'.v(i|.; I'Vir not lliiiliiiK Nun-licN for llic|H'ac(' IliO, 121 Of wiliit'HH rcruHJiiv; to lie sworn or Kivt' t'vidcncc.liis, llMt Of witni'Ns ri'fushiK !<• '>•' liound over tofjivc i'\ idciicf "JJM On siiinniai'V coMN'icI ion . .^tli), :u'7, a'C), :;h7, :(S!», ;iiii. ;tiMi COMMON ASSAll/r 4<U COMMON MAWDY llOl'SK 17(1, 171 COMMON HK'JTrNC, HOISK 171, 172 COMMON CAMINli IIOUSK . .-)57 Kci'pinu; ."wT Kviilcnco. ... .").")7, -V)!! I'lii.vinn or looking on in M) Oli.Htrui'tiii.LC I't'uci' OtHfi'r en- tering .'ititl . SoarfliinK I21-12!l COMMON Nl'ISANCK (t'li, (i:«l COMMON' I'HOSTITrTK (Sec \'ii!/riiii(\i/.) CO.MI'AIMSON of (lisi)ntc(l writin^c with K<'ii'iine '>'Si COMPKN.S\TI()N, for loss of property (ilil To lioiKi Jiilc piircliHser of stolen prop -rty 27i> (See licstitiitiuii.) COMPLAINT (See /n/ori)U>tii)ii diid ('oi)i- pldint.) COMPKI-LING IiicrimiiiatinK .\iiswers .525 COMFOT:NUIX(i I'eMui aetlons .5(11 Corrnptly oirerin^ rewjird for return of stolen property.. 502 t'orruptly takinj; rewanl. ..... .501 COMITLSION, by force 508 My necessity .50-1 HV Threats. .503 Of Wife 504 CONCEALING Encumhrances 540 COMPUTATION of limitations of time 08 CONCE.\LMKNTOF BIKTH. lOS CONCKI'TION I'.\(ii: Advert isinn drills for jn-event ■ iuK |;IK CONDITIONAL IfKLKASK of rlrst ollenihrs. 201, 202. :t.'W CONKI'XSIONS 2i:i CONFIDKNTI.M. COM.Ml'NI CATION.S .52:» CONSENT Of Attorney (ieneral re(|nired for certain proseciit ions. .77. 7.'^ (».'■ (iovernor (iiMieral recpiiicd 77 Of .Minister of .Mar. and I'Msh- eries re(piired 7H Of youn^' child to dellleineni immaterial and no defeiiee 42.S, 420 Of ^irl under Hi to her ahdue tioii Inimaterial Mi. Kit CONSEHVATOItS OF THE PE.KCE Ill (.See /ntruihirliiiii.) CONSPIJLACY .504 111 restraint of trade .505 To hriiiK fJilse accusation. . . .500 To commit an indictahle of- fence .50" To defraud .507 To intimidate a IcKlslatiire.. . . .50S CONTAGIOrs DISEASES, Of animals .508 CONTE.MPT Commit iiicnl for. . :«i, :«», lOS, liKt. 228, 875 CONTHACT, Criminal breach of ")(ts CONTWIHCTOHY NEGLIGENCE. (.See nuniirit/r.) CONVERSION (See T/ie/f.) CONVEYANCE OF CATTLE by rail or water 515 CONVICTION On siimmarv trial of indict- able otVeiice 204 On summarv trial of non- indictable otl'eiice 881, 88H Certain irregularities not to invalidate. 8.5» Not t'> lie (plashed for defects of form •55.5- GENEUAI- INI)KX. 693 (JOOWNKRS AND I'AIM' I'Adi-: NI'MJS, Tlii'fts liy fiOH Concciiliiiji (iold or Hllver wirli iiilont ti> (icl'i'iiud ixii'tner in iiiiiiiii^ claiiii 501) ('()IU)NKI{ Musi send pci'Hoii iilli'ctcil hy liiidiii^ of lii.s Jiirv lu'l'orc a iiiii^^islratr Ilti COHONKirS INQl'ISrTION Xo line can l(c li'icd upon 117 roHI'SIO DiKfiiui;' up aflt'i' liui'ial ol;') .Nf^rlccl to huvy 51(1 Indecent I rcatnicnt of 51(1 COSTS -Mi, ;KK(. :«I7, :M2, :<t:t, ai5, :t47, ;m Security for may lie ordered to l)e furuislied liy pi'ose- cutoi' '. 221 rOHi'OifA'i'lONSnppear, loin diiluu'iit. I)y attorney 50!) CORHl<;CTI()N' (See /Hsrl/i/hir) 5IM. 510 Immoderate 5()0 COKHOhOUA'i'ION (See h'l!- (Ifiiii) I'OIimi'TION, Of judjjes 4S7 At elections 480 Of ollieers empioyed in jiroHC- culinji oll'eniiers 4Hli Of (iovernnient otliciais 488 Selling (M- ]>nrcliasin^ ai.v public ollice .. - ■ 488 In municipal all'airs, 488 Of juror,-, or witnesses 521 t"orNsi';i, At iireliminarv encpiirv. . . liHt, 202, -Wi In summary trials ;tlO COUNTKUFKITIN(; 500-512 COl'KTS, Decline of County or Hundred ('ourts (See Iiitru- ililr/loti) II Early Knglisli Courts I CRIMINAL INFORMATION. 41,4:i, 100 CROSS-EXAMINATION 210 Extent of rlKlit of ,..,.. 524 CREDITORS, Defrauding 548 CRIMINAL IM;SI'0NSI I'.uiK HILITY, I'rolection from.. 07, IW (.See ('ii.imiilj/ for Ciiiiif) (See liihnh (See /i/iitiriiiHr) (See Inniinitu) CRCKLTYTO ANIMALS, ... 512-515 The lawonly Hi)plles todonies- (ic animals 5i;j Caged lions aie not domestic. 51H Cliamcleons arc not domestic. 5111 CrD'AMLK IIO.MKUDK. 5(il ."Mia Alanslaugliter 5(W, ."iiiO Murder ."i((5, 5(i« DAMACE (.See Afisr/iii;,). . . (ilOll2» DAN(iEROrS ACTS, Duty of pensous doing '. . . . 02(V DANdEROlS TIIIN(!S, Duty of persons in cliarg<^ of (i27 DANC EROI 'S WEAPONS (See OlIriiKi'ir W'ltipoHs.) DEAD HODIKS 515 Diguing up, after hurial 515 Neglect of duty to l)ury 51((- Miscoinluet inrespect lo 51(1 DKAK AND DC.MM WITNESS, Hvulence of 201) DEATH, Acceleration of 50:} l''ollo\viirg treatment of injury inllicted '. 5(i:i I'rocui'cd l>y fal<e evidence. . . 502 DEFENCE, Of dwelling-house . 458 Of movable property 458 Of real |)ro])erty 451)' DECEASED WITNESS, Read- ing deposition of, at trial . . . 107 DECLARATIONS In lieu of oaths . (WI DEFACING COINS 510 DEFAMATORY LIRFL COO DEFILEMENT OF FEMALES 516-5 1» DEFINITION OF Abandon 420 Abortion 481 Accessory after the fact (Ki Actual breaking 40O <i!M I'HACTICAI- OUIDK TD M AlllSTKATES. DKKINTIION OK I'AdH Adiillt-nilioii XW AdViiv MO All«'niiiiii'e U-l AiNKii ". 45<) AsMuiill 4iV< Allcmiil jflTi Itiink iiott" o-IH IJiiudv liDiise no Hi'lt injj; lioiiMc 471 HiKiiiiiv 474 Jllusiilifiiiy 47H Uri'iu'h of till' pt'iice 48(1 Uuckt'l >li()|) 55"), rWiO Hiii'^jcliiry 4HH (Jiii'iiiil kiiowh'dKe (U4 C'littl 4il5 Ci'i'tioniri '.m Cliicli-nllHtiihle lii CU'vk of lilt' pciu'C 2i\!. UKI C'oiiiliiiiiitiuiiH ill iTNti'iiiiit (if trade rM) CiiiiiiiKiii liivwiiy hnuRi' 170 Coinnioii lu'tl iiiK house 471 Coiiiiiioii K'i'XiiiiK lioii'^L' 557 Coiiinioii iiiiIniiiil'c 02}) (.'onspiraey 504 Coiispiriicy to defrmul 5(HI Con.si)ii'iit'y in ro.stniiiit of t I'udi' 505 Const rui'tivf hrciikinK 491 Counterfeiting 501) County :no County iittorncy 2«7 Court 772 Culpal)ie lioniieide 5<tl Defainiitorylilu'l (R)6 I)i onierlv house 520 Distriet." 310 "Document" (in relation to forgery) 543 Duel ...' 41M( Dweliinn house 488 Embracery 521 En ranee 488 4)K) Exehe(|uer hill 543 Ex<'usal)le homicide 504 False document 543 False pretence 531 Food ^W Forcil)le entry and detaine.. 540 Forgery 542 Gaming hotise 557 Habeas corpus 3<t8 Homicide 501 Incest 572 Judge (in extradition matters) 073 Judge (in speedy trials) 207 Justice 310 JustiHable homicide 563 Kidnapping 004 Libel 006 Lottery 611 DKKINITIOX OK l>.\(iio .Magistrate 2H7 .Manslaugliter (MIS Mischief HIO Murder B05 Night 489 Non-culpable honiicidu 'i63 OlVenslve \yeapons OU Perjury 535, 5:tfi I'eddle'rs 031, (US Political oll'eiice 070 Priiie llgliting 6-12, 643 Pul)liNhinK <IOtt Piracy fl!«t Police magistrate 287 Proyocation 457,509 Uape B44 Keceiylng. (H7 lliot 480, 4m Hobbery.. (U» He<lit ions conspiracy 053 Seditious libel «6H Seditions \yoids 652 Seduction 053, 654 Self-defence 457, 504 Territorial division 310 . Theft 657, 058 Treason 667 Unlawful assembly 480, 482 Vagrancy 070 Witchcraft 548 DEKHAl'DLNG CUEDITOHS.. 548 DELIHIUM TREMENS 576 (See Jiruii/cnnii'nn) 576 DEMANDING vyith intent to steal 604 ■ DEPOSITIONS, At preliminary en(pnry 203 Copies of 221 DESEHTEHS. {Hi'ii Arm y anil Xini/) 446-448 (See North- [Vest Mounted Po- lice) 628 DISABLING. (See Adminis- ter iim Drvgn, etc.) 433 DISCHAHGE Of accu.sed when no .sufHcient case 220 DISCRETIONARY POWERS of justice at preliminary en(piiry 109 DISCIPLINE of minors 518 , On ships 519 (lENEIlAI, I DISMISSAL I'MiH ("crlillciitf of, 11 l)iir 1(1 fiirllicr linni'Ciliiii^H , L'ill, 2»'}. :«lt. Of (')iiirK('. <») HUiiiiniii'y ti-liil "f iii.liclalilc Dllfmc :!!ll, 2tH» Of cliiir')!!', MM .siiniiniiiii'v li'i;il of lion iiiilicliihU' oll'i'iu't'. . .'CttI Of coinpliiiiil for iissaiilt :<lll, llll DISOIIKIMKNCKlo ii stiitiilf .".2(1 'I'o oiilci's of II I'oui't 520 I)IS()1!I)KI{I-Y H0USK8 5'A) DISTHKSS iMKloi'sciiiciit of wiirrniit of. . ;II7 Not to JHsiii' ill (■(■I'liiiii ciiM's.. ;t4S Tciiilci' itiiil pfi.viiicnt ill (Un- ciiai'Ku of ■ :>"2 DKSTlJUmXO imlilir wcsliip.. (172 DRILLING 520 DHIVINC, Furious,.. ., .■).-.2 DHrrUilNC ,,.. 431 DIMNKKNNKSS ,570 DHUdS, AdiniiiisloiInK i:«{-4:{5 Advert isiii); oliscciic 4HH (St'i- Moliciiif ituil l>ur(ii'ni). . OIH (Sw Poixoii) ' (WO DUTY, ii^i'i' Mithitinauvi) 015 (See X(i/lii/)iici') (120, (127 DYLNd DKCLAIIATION.. 215. 210 l''()rin of 142 KAHLY EN(!LLSH COrUTS. i-ii KLECTION OF TRIAJ- BY J UR Y 273, 274, 21)0, 203, 302 KLKCTKIC FiKillT. (See Con- triict) 508 (See Jiispi'cfitm.) 579 (See MiHc/iicJ) 021 KMllFZZLFxMENT Merged in Thi;!' r 0(12 EMBHACERY .521 EMPLOYERS and Workmen. {SPi\ Infivutlation.) iSi'ii Tra(/c Union.) ENDANCERING LIFE. (See E.vplonirrn) 52!) (See Mischief) 022, 023 NDE.K. 695 E\TI('l\(i Paiik To deserMoii ,,,,,,. ,140, 44H 'I'd iiiiilliiv 447 (See . I /■///(/ "/k/ .Vdc//) 11(1, III) (See ,V. IC! .I/()l(/l^■(/'/'o//(•(■ 02H ESCA PES .WD I1ES("UES ... 52* EN'IDENCE, Accused eoiiijie tent to «ive 20-1 .Must, us It rule, he on oivth.. . 205 .Miis lie on iilliriiiiition. ...205, 324 Of mule.. m) Of fiiici>4ii \vitiie«»eM 201) ()f y iKelilid 211 ' l''or pioseeiil ion ill preliiiiln- ar.V eiMiiiiry 202 'I'likeii III preliniiniiry eiuiniry to lie leiKJ to iieeiised 211 Of eonfe.ssion or ndniissioii , 213 For defence iit preliniiiiiiry en- MUiry ' .. . . 21(1 Expeliency of eiillinn defend- mil's wiliieNseM jil preliniiii- iiry eiKinlry 217 Of licensed when prosecuted under provjnciiil laws, . 320-324 Of e.xeiiipi ions and exceptions 325 Of iiecoinplice 623 General rules of ,522, fil"! Of ot her criininal acts coinniit- led liy licensed ... ."20 l)oeiinieiiiiir\' 527 Of skilled or sclent illc wit- nesses 527 Exainination ill chief 201) C'rossexaniination 510 Extent of ri^ht to cross-ex- amine 624 Ke-exainlniition 211 Of one witncKs siillicient lis a rule 201 In ca.ses of I''()ii(Ji-;i<v, Pi:ii .luiiv, I'koci-uini; a i-iui.n- IM) M.Mtl! I Ad l:, SKLIITC- I'loN and 1)i;i'ii,i;.mi;n"i, and Thkason, one witness not sndicient unless corrobor- ated 204 EXAMINATION IN CHIEF :. 209 EXCAVATIONS LeaviiiK uiifj;uarded 628 EXCIIEliU KR BILL 543 EXCISE 527-520 EXCUSABLE HOMICIDE 664 EX PARTE PROCEEniNGS., Suniinary trials may be pro- ceeded with in defendant'.s absence 325 (!!li I'll \('TI(".\I. (iriDK TO M AdISTRATRN. KXn.OSIVK SniSTAN- PA(iK CKS, I'liiliuiucrliiK •)!' Injur- iiiffi fi' iir |ini|n'il> liy. Wit, WKt KXI'OSINti 111.' iHi.M.ii ."2 KXI'OIM'ION riJKl ll\ ililiMIIJlldIV lilu'l Wl Uv lliiviils. (f^oi- Tliirdt.-). .(WH(«I7 KXTItADITAHI,!'; Ol'KKN'CKS lli't w ('I'll Ciuiiidii mill I '. S. i7i 1177 KXTKADITKIN l''ii)iii C'liiailii . I''l'iilil I'lil'i'igli StHt« lii'i\M>)'ii ('iiiiiulii and I'ltitcit MaU'N FAllHU'ATINC KVIDKNCK KACTOIilKS ACT (Oiihiilm. •' ((iuclifc) , (i7;i (175 il7ii ':i i;i FAC'i'OliS Niil niiilly of llicfl, !)>■ pit'dj;- iliK pliiirmars y,0(<ilH iii ex- tent (if pi'iiii'lpiirN Inilehted- ni'N- to liu'iii 412 (See W'li rtlioHHi- lliirl iifn\,.'M, .Vil KAIH t'O.MMKNT. . KAIW ("lUTICiS.M .. FAII{ DISCUSSION . (KIS . . (KHI . liOH FAII{ UKI'OUTS mi-m) FALSK DOCUMFXT 54:! FAI.SK NEWS, SpioadiiiK 5:u FALSE 1'HFTKN'CH;S 5;{l-5:Mi FALSE RECEIPTS 550 FALSE SIOXALS (120, ((22 FALSI-; TELECHAMS 5:17 FALSF TICKETS, OlXiiiiilng Jiiissajje l)y riVi FALSIFYIXC HOOKS (Si-e l)il'r(tii(Uiifi CrciHlofH). . 54!) (See Unities, liiinkfrs niiil H((iiK()lficifit.s 470 FEAR, (See F r it/It f fining) 502 f*EkS " ^^ ~" To he taken by justices and find their clerks 343 I FELO I)i; SK. I'AUK I I See Siiiriilr) . (a"i FELONY AND .M ISDKM |;AN OK. I)i>>i iiict ion lietween lllinlislied SO FF.MALES, Delilenieiil uf 51(1 FLUE NATIII.E, Aninmls, (See T/ii/h (I5H FKRRIF.S.. m Fi;i{TILI/i;i{S. 541 I'INDINii LOST TIIINtiS, 4'liel't liy (WKi, (Kll FINKS Lev\ liiK ;tl5. ;147 FIRF ARMS, (.See Ojr,' n. -<;,■<• irni/iDHs) 531, 5;t2 FISHERIES 5;w FOOD. .Vdiilleratlcin of r):t,s..-,||i Sellinu- tliiiiK^^ unlit lor 541 FORCIO, (-'onipnlsiini hy 'M FORCIULE FNTRV iiiui de- tainer 541 FOREKiN SOVERElllN, Lil.el on 542 FORtiKR V .letlned 542, 543 Proof uf 517 Hy usjii)iii ll<'titious naine.545, 54(1 I'ORMS OF Oalli'4 of (|U(iliticHtion of ii .1. P », » Gal lis of allegiance tinil of olllee 11, 13, 15 I'ORM OI' Oath to be administered to a witness 205 Oath of an interpreter 2(HI Soleinii declaration in Ueu of oat h K^i Atlirination instead of oath. . . 205 Inforniation and coinplaint for an indictable otl'ence.... 130 DyinK Declaration 142 Summons to accused 137 Dejiosit ion of service 141 Warrants of apprehension of accused 137, 1!W, 13!) aKNKIlAI. INDRX. HOT roit.M OF Pa. IK I'Jiiliii'Hi-iiii'iil ill Imcklri^ II wiuTHiii i;iil W'lii'i'iini Id (■(iiivcy iiccUHi'd lit liiiollii'l' ciMiiil y ! IM,") Inriiriiiiii lull til olitiiiii II NiMircli WMriiiiil. I III W'lirniiii Id sciiitIi I In I'dlt.MS OK .Sialrliicill-. Ill illilii'liihlt' of IVlK'f^ imilM) F(JH\IS III ((iiiiiciiioii with lire liiiilniirv ciiijiiirv, iiiidcr I'lirl \\.V. (il ilic'Cddf.. iJi'iiJI.-, FOU.M Ol' |)t'|iiiMltidii llial a iMTMiii i« IV iiiiitciiiil wil iicsH , , . 2'W Oidc," Id liiintt iiji ac('UHi>(l hv- Idrc ('X|iii'atioii dl' rciiiiiiiil . . 240 McllKi, iiii (Idcilincills pru. iliii-ci| ill cvidcin-c 2(7 liirnriiiall<iii df Mirciii-H to lia\(' acciiHcd (1111111111 tt'il .... 217 W arrant Idapiiri'lii'iiilacfiiHcil ill iiislaiKT of iii.s liail 2IH ('diiiiiiiliiiciit of iicc'H.si'(l, . .. 2tl» I'Oli.M Ol' lii'Cdid in (diiiicciicin witli -'licf'l.v Irial.s 2M1, 2H2 Acca.satiiin in (■oiiiifctloii witli >-|ii'tMly trials 285 Slicriir's iidtici' 2H(I Warnint to ii|)|irt'licnd wit- IICSH ^Kt (-Iciiiviction for contciTiiit 2H4 t'liiivict inns oil siiiiiniuiy t rial df iildictalilcod'cncc ,. 21»H, 2l»il ('I'ltiliciilo of disinis.sal 2I»1» ( 'ci'ti Ileal fdf dismissal on trial <if .Invi'iiilc ollcndi-r ;t08 €i'rtiticate (if disinissal 'M) Smiiiimry coiivii'tions and or- ders for noii-indictiiblo of- ffiiii't's :»7r)-;).s(i Order of disinissal 1182 Certilleate of disiiiisHal IKJ Warrants of distress and war- raiilH of cdiniiiitment ;Wf-;{l»l Certili('at(' df ndii-appearance to lie endorHC'd on defeiid- (lant's recoKiii/anee 302 N'otiee of a|ipeiii from sniu- niiiry convietion or order. . . 'M2 HecoKiiizanee to try appeal. . . Mi Notice thereof 31)4 Certifieate of Clerk of the Peace as to non-ixiyiiiciit of eosfs of appeal 395 AV'arrantof distress and war- rant of coinniitnient for costs 31)5, 307 I'OII.M Ol' |.,^„,.. .liKlmnciil (if allli'iiiaiici' on Writ df e . It . ^ ('(•rlidrail rccoKiilxniice ', if.,, Ileiiiriidf «ril " Will df halieas (nr ' L, Writ of Klcri facias , .ji^ ('iiinplalnl Id dhialii hun'tii'H for I he peace. llccdKllizance to keciit he pea( e |-j:| Cdliiinllnietil |„ d,.f,iii|| of siirci II s Warrant of apprelieiision iii e\tiailitldii iiiatlers (177 Warrant of coininilial for ex- ll'Hilltinll ((7<| Order for suneiiiler of extra- dited fll^tillv,, ,...^... , ffjg T'lncin'KNI.Vt; Child or sick persnn Id death. FrcrrrvK ofkkndkh.s (.see /■'■•■' i<ii/;/;,„n (173 1175 I'roiii Mnii.sl, territory out- side ol Caiiadu (W-tlHl <iAAIMI.l\(; III railway cars, steainlidatH and other public coiivey- aiices oo2 O.A.MK L.VW.S liiQnehec... 55., Ill Ontario 554 (iA.MK l'l{K,si;i{V.\TK)X In nnornanized portions of '^- ^V. T 664 (iAMFXC IN .STQfKS ^55 «;amin(; iiousks 557 (il'ILTY ACKXT 511. 441, 442 (ail/rv KXOWKKDCE. 5^", "71, o7l>, 647, (148 HAnKAS roHiTs m.:m r drill of writ of 402 In extradition matters. . il74 075 I'lider the KiiKitive Odciider.s" •^^■f 680 HAXDWRITIXG, Comparison of i3, 517 HARBOR MASTERS 501 HAWKERS (See Peddlern). aw .IMlAcTtc \I, ill'lltK T<» MAUtHTKATKi^. IIKAIIINt; I'Aiu: () I iiicIImiImiii.v <'iii|ulr.V . iWJ»'^ III siiiiitiiiirv II'Ihin. . , ' . iliAt'iVU liiriiiiiiiiiiiiii UlA, Hl7 IIKIHKSS (Skc Miilurlii>n\ iinni coi'iiT nr .iuhii,.- in Oiitiirio II II Kill 8KAS, OIUiiccH on llir HMl. 107 llhill IIIKASON (Mff Trnisn,,). IIINIXX) Moili' (if Sw nirlnn a. Lt»7 IIOI.KS IN Id-; l.t'iiviiiKMiiiiH' iiiiK'iiai'dcil OliN HO.MICIDK (•iii|iaipi.- m\ Null rul|iiil)li" iVIil K\cil>ulili' «♦« .lllslilliililr BOH All iilciiliil M\ III Ni'll' ili'i'cncH ."((U MaiiHliiiiKlittT tVW MiiriliT iVIS I'niviMiilioM fMHt IIOl SKIIUKAKING (Sic Jliir IIOISK Ol' 11,1, I'AMH iSi'i- /l(iirili/-//iiiisi , Skiic/i W'lir- mill mill \'<i{/riiiir!/). III'MAX HKMAINS (Si'i- /).„,/ Ilnih/) ;il(l iirsiiwi) Dili V III', to II ml lit a ill \\i If. II. 'i, I Hi SlcalliiK liy liiisliaiid or wilV, oil!' from till' otluT \x lii'ii liviii),; apart , (172 (Sfc Afci.sdriis.) l("K lA'aviiiK iiiiKUiirik'il holes in. . (I2S IDIOTS (See JhJII.'tntnt) .-)l(l-nlH IDhK I'KHSONS (S.'f I'd- tjrnmy) (170 ICNOHANCRof law 570 Of fact 57 ILLICIT t'ONxNKCTION (Set- Si(liirfit»t) (152 IMMICHATION .i72 (See CliincHc IininiyrnHtiu).. . IDH INCKST l»A.i|.! m INCI'I'IMI to iniilliiy 44«| To ili'Mi'i'iion 4|ij liiillitiiM to rlotiiiiN artH A7A IN(IJI.MI\ATIN(i ANSWKIJS ,'^:^^ INDIH'KNT ACTS . m I'ost iiiu liiinionil liool<H 574 I'lililUliliiK or i'\|iiihIii(( 1)1)- Hf»'iii' iimlti'r Ti"! INDKCKNT ASSAULTS MH', |ii:i im)K("|";nt HXi'osruK 57:1 iM)i:ci:\T OH OMSCKM': SHOW (Si'i- Viniiiimji) INKI AN AliKNTSaiv .IiiMIion i:i- iijUriii 2 INDIAN (MJAVKS, Sli'iillnw art icl»»H frojii 57ft INDI ANStSiM- III.' /ti,H,t„ All) 07.-1 51W INDIAN WO.MKN I'i'iist it lit ion of. , . INDIcrADLK (>FI''KNCi:S, Tiil.li' of 2.M 2(«1 i'lrliiiiinarv i'iii|iiiry into IINI S| crdv trial of 2(17 Siiniiiiarv trial of 2m7 Trial of Jiivi'iiilc oII'i'IiiIits for IWNI INDICT.MKNT, MinilliiK piim.. iiitor to jirrfiT 221, 222 INKAMOrs (If I. MM (See Aliiiiiiiniilili Criinr) IHI I.NIWNTS (.Sfi- Ciipucihi fin- Criiiir) IIC) INI-'OILMATION Ol! CO.M I'LAINT Layiiin: or iiiakiiiK Idl |{t'i|iiisii('.s of llU Hearing' 105 (o'licral form of HMl To olitaiii Hcarcli warr int. 117 l-'orni of Inforniiition for Mciircli warrant 1 III I'"or otIViict'.s piiiiishalili! hhih- inarily :ill, :U2 Hi'UniHitt's of ;n I, :tl5, 'XVy Didcrcnce lit'twccn an infor- mation ami a romplaint ... 'M't To lit' for out' oHViu'e only H15 Ci'i'iain olijfctionH not to vitiau- :ilfl UKNIHAI. INIilX. b'JU INKOItMATION', V.\nr. Illll or iiiudi'iiliirH ,117 Vai'iiuici'N mill uiiiiMiiliiii'iitN :iltl. Ml TniiiHtiilNHiiiiiiif, on ritiiiiiilititl fi.r friiil t£\ iS.i [m KH (Si-i- Mixrh Iff} (m (Si'i' h'.iiilo.iiiiM) iVU) INNOCKNT A(iK\T 511 INSANITY, I,.khI I1-.I uf . 575 or ai'ciiMi'ii lit I jiiif of iiirciii'i',, 571) 1)1' arniHt'il on liliil 577 ('liHliiily (if iiiHuiiiM'i'iliiiimlH . 57H INSI'KCTION (Ji'ii.'ml InHpcc tioii f,7H < »f RUN 57H Of ••liflilr IlKllt 57» Of |ii'lrili'iiiii 57l» Of slilpK 57lt Of HtuiiiiiliiMitM 57l( INTKNT 57lt, m) (Si'c (')if>iififi//itr (.'rinii'), (Ht'i- l(/n(>''(iticf). INTKHI';STOH HIAS of ft wit- iii'Sh no Imr 204 Of 11 .Inst Ice of llin I't-ace mny ilis.iimlify lilin 25-;W INI'IMIDATION 3H0 Of woi'kini'ii 681 Of IH'OllllCC (ll'llll'IN, HICVC- (lorcH, Nlii|)i'ar|ii-nlci-s, etc. 581 Of liiililerM at miiu of j)ul)lic liiiids 581 I.NTOXICATINd LigrOHS Lli|iior NcJIiiiK R ncrajiy 5H2 Ht's|)('ctlv(> powcfN of tiio l)(l- initilon and I'i'ovlni-ial l.c- Klslatiiri's r,H2, iM, 584 Proviiioliil iictH I'cKiilnti k the Hah' of 584, 585 SflliiiK without lIceiiHe .580, 587, 588, 5«t» In rhil)M 58H ,S('lllng (luring proiiiliitcd iioiirs 'm, 5)»() Hoiui ll<h' travelliT 51)(l SeilinK oil" tlu! Ilct'iisi'd prc- niisi's 51)1, 502, 5!« Sut).si'i|ueiit odiMiccM 51)4 The Canada TiMnpi-rance Act. 51)5 ((Oil Near public works tK)4 JKVV Mode of SvvearinK a 207 JOINT TKNANTS, ]..^„k I'hi'ft liy. M)H •iriMiK Mt-aiilnn of In npitilv ti'laU ', '^yj l'ow«»rHof, 111 Hiwmly tilaU '. 27ft .MMISDICTION of .Siiprilor <'rliiiln il ( 'oiirtM n| Of (ii'iiiTiil or l^nailcr Sc,.. »i"lix . H2 Of MiaulMtiali-N nn III tin- N. \V. T(Trlli>rl«H.. . M Of ILshi'iy oillifiH . H/i Locally, in regard to olli- iiei-N ('oininilti'd on a, journey and under (•erliiiii oilier m|mmI(i| c'irfum.staiu'i'N 85, Htl, K7, 88, Mt», IK) .M'STICKS OF Till-; I'KACK, In.Mtltiitlon of Ill Creation of the .siiniinary ,jnr iMiietioii of , ' IV Kx Olllelo 1 ;j A|iiio|iitnient of, liy eoininlH- Hioii . , " 4 (I Property ipialilieatloii of (I Oatti of i|iialllU'atioii ot 7 |) Oatli.s of allegiance and of olllce of 10 12 I'ernoiiH prohibited from act- liiK an la Nature and extent of the powei-H of 18 24 |)iM|iiallfvinn InlereHt, bliiH or partiality 25 .•12 Ouster of their .sum niarv juri.s- dictioii. :{2" ■;«, ;i4, ;i5 Power of, to maintain order and commit for contempt . .;«! :18 Liabilitvof, for iilcK-tl acts. ..:«) 4U Formiilltles of actions aKainst, under the Code and under provincial Acts SOffil Mandamus to 54 5fi Rule in the nature of a man- damns 5«1 57 Preliminary etii|ulry by 11)0 224 Discretionary powers of, at preliminary eiKiuiry 191) Summary trials lietore HIO ;i37 DiiticH of, in ea.ses of riot. .48:1, 4H4 CarryiiiK oll'ensive weapon.s without certllleate of Ki2 .niSTIFIAULK HOMICIDE.. . 5<W .lUSTIFICATION, Of suuiinary arrests by a i)eace olHcer. . .1)5 97 Of persons assisting peace ofll- cer 96 45 700 PRACTICAL «U;i)E TO MAQISTRATES. JUSTIFICATION Paok Of sHiiiiniirv arrest by private individuivlH ' Wl Of force used In ai rests W •irVENILE OFFENDERS, Trial of when uiuler six- teen :«M)-;«u Punislunent of, for theft MOl Accused person under sixteen must be kept separate and be tried separately from other accused per8ons.S01-;^()2 (Wii May elect to be tried bvajury. 302 In Ontario '. 080 In New Brunswick 08« KEEPING A bawdy house 288, 471 A betting house 288, 472 A gaming house ,5.57 Pool rooms 288, 47:1 KIDNAPPING 004 KILLING A child or sick person by frightening o<12 Animals 444 Cattle 495 Game 553-55,5 By accident 504 By influence on the mind 502 In a duel 490 In self-defence 564 Unborn child 432 When death might have been prevented 503 LAND, Fraudulent seizures of. . 5.50 LAND MARKS, Injuries to ... 605 LANDLORD AND TEN ANT.. 604 LARCENY. (See Theft.) LAW, Ignorance of 570 LEADING QUESTIONS . . .209, 210 LEAVING HOLES in Ice un- guarded 028 LEWDNESS. (See Indecent Acta.) 573, 574 LEX LOCI CONTRACTUS. (See Bigamy.) 477 LEVYING FINES, etc 345, .347 LEVYING WAR 605 LIBEL 600-611 Blasphemous 478 LIBEL Paoe Defamatory Vm Extortion liv defamatory Oil Selling periodicals or l)ooks containing defamatory 010 LICENSES. (See 'ntoxirntiny Lititiov.) (See FediUerH) LIMITAllONS Of actions against justices. ... 50 Of prosecutions under the Criminal Code 05, 06 Of prosecutions in summary n utters, 70-72, 311 Other limitations 07 Computation of limited tlme.08, 69 1^ U'OR. (See Iuto.rUating Liquor.) 582 LIST, Of Indictable olFences. .251-266 Of non-indictable oirences. .403-408 LODGER, Theft by 604 LOOSE, IDLE AND DISOR- DERLY PERSONS. (See Vagrancy.) LORDS DAY, (See Sunday.) LOST THINGS, Theft bv find- ing '...000, 061 LOTTERIES 611 MAGISTRATE. Appointment of 14-18 Powers and duties of (See Jus- tices) 18 MAGISTERIAL JURISDIC- TION .I 83 MAHOMMEDAN Mode of swearing a 207 MAILABLE MATTER, Steal- ing (See Post Office) 642 MAINTENANCE .... 615, 616 MALICIOUS INJURIES (See Mischief) MANDAMUS 54-56 MANSLAUGHTER 568 MARRIAGE, Fti^ned 617 Solemnizing, without lawful authority 617 GENERAL MARRIAGE, Paok Illegal solemnization of 017 MARRIED WOMEN, Compul- sion of 504 MASTER AND SERVANT ... 017 MEDICINE AND SURGERY. . 018 MENACES. (See Threats.) MENS REA. (See Intent) 57!) MILITARY AND NAVAL NE- CESSARIES. (See Army and Nary) 448, 441) MIXES, MLscliief to 022 MINUTE OF ADJUDICA- TION -m MISCHIEF, On railways Oil) 020, 021 To mines 022 To electric telegraphs, elec- tric lights, etc 021 Wrecking 021 Other mischiefs 023, 020 MISDEMEANOR AND FEL- ON Y, Dist ' lion between, abolished 80 MISTAKE, Of fact 570 Of law 571 MORTGAGE, Fraudulent 550 MORTGAGEE, Frauds upon. . . 549 MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS, Cor- ruption in 488 MURDER 505 Attempts to 500 Conspiracy to 507 Threats to 507 Accessory after fact to 507 (See Suicide.) MUTE, Evidence of 209 MUTINY, Inciting to 440 NAVIGATION, Of Canadian waters ; 026 NAVIGABLE WATERS, Pro- tection of 620 NECESSARIES, (See Mainte- nance 615 INDEX. "701 NECESSITY, Paoe Compulsion by. . . 504 NEGLIGENCE Duty of persons doing danger- ous acts 620 Dtity of persons in charge of dangerous things 027 Duty to avoid omissions dan gerous to life 327 NEGLECTING child 426 To provide necessaries 615, 610 \E(;LI(iENTLY endangering railway passengers. (i27 (Causing l)odily injury 64 NEWSPAPER advertisement oll'ering reward for return of stolen property. 502 NON-INDICTABLE OFFEN- CES, Table of 40:^-408 NORTH WP:ST MOUNTED POLICE 628 NORTH WEST TERRITORIES 628 NOTICE of action against Jus- tices ,50 Of Appeal ; 351 NUISANCES 629, 630 OATH, Power to administer ... 630 Of Allegiance n Modes of administering to a witness 203-219 OBSCENE MATTER, Selling. . 547 OBSTRUCTING OFFICERS... 631 OBSTRUCTING OFFICIAT- ING CLERGYMEN 672 OBTAINING BY FALSE PRE- TENCES 531 OFFENSIVE WEAPONS... 631633 OFFICERS engaged in prose- cuting ofTenders, Corruption of 487 OFFICES, APPOINTMENTS, ETC., Selling 488 OFFICIATING CLERGYMAN, Obstructing 672 702 PRACTICAL OUtOE TO MA0I8TIIATES. OMISSION'S I'AiiK (langcrous to life, Duty to avoid 027 ONTAUIO FACTORIES ACT. . (WH OFKNIXGS, LfiiviiiK unguard- ed (L'H ORDER IN' COURT, Maintiiin- ing :«! ORDERS OF COl'RT, Disobe- dience of 5;iO PARENT, Duty to provide ne- ceHsaries 015 POLYGAMY Paoe ..641 P.UISEE Mode of swearing a 207 TARTTeS TO OFFENCES 5,^-154 PATENTS (i;t:i PAWN HROKERS (!:« PEACK, Breaelu's of tlie 4S0 ArticleHof tlie UU 422 PEDDLERS KMUm PERJURY fl:{ora7 PERSON, Stealing from the.. tMi2 PERSONATION «37 PETROLEUM, Inspection of . . . 579 PILOTAGE 0:<s PIRACY mj PLAY, Cheating at 4iM) PLAYINtJ, or looking on at play in a G^iniing House . . . 6(i0 POISON, Sale of, by unautlior Ized persons, prolubited.(K^!», (540 Administering 4:{1, 5(Ki POLICE MAGISTRATES, Ap pointment of 14 l.S Their powers, duties and ros- ponsibilities lH-24 Disqualifying Interest 25 Liability 'for Illegal Acts :«> Power of, to maintain order . IIO, 375 POLITICAL OFFENDER, Not extraditable 670 POOL SELLING.. .^ 473 I'OSTING obscene matter 631 POST OFFICE 642 PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY , . UK) PREVIOUS CONVICTION .. 5i)8 (See T/ii/l) («14 PRINCIPALS 58 62 PRIZE FIGHTING 042, 0!3 PROCEDENDO, not necessary in order to return conviction on r(>fiisal to (|uash it 1)02 PR0(;LAMAT10NS, I'roofof.. 527 PROtU RING DeOlement of fe- males .570 PROFANITY. (See lilnaphemy) 478 PROMISE OF MARRIAGE, Seduciion under 053 PROOF, (See h'riihnce).im, 197, 1!)>-I, 202-217, 320-325, 522-5-29 PROSECU TOR may appear by counsel "200, 202, 203, 319 May bind himself to prosecute after dismis.sal of charge at l)reliminary enquiry 221 May be ordered to give secur- ity for costs 221 PROVOCATION 5(59 PI RLIC WORSHIP '» Disturbing 072 QUALIFICATION of Justices'. 0, 7 QUASHING Conviction ...:M), 301 QUEEN, Assaults on the 465 RAILWAYS 043, 044 Conveyance of Cattle by rail. . 043 Criminal Breach of Contract by 508 Gambling in Railway Cars... . 552 False Railway Tickets 643 Forgery of Railway Tickets. . 0^13 Mischief on 019-021 Negligently endangering pas- sengers on 627 Stealing on — 644 OKNEHAL INDKX. 703 KAILWAYS Pacik Stealing Rjiilwiiy Tickets tH4 HAI'K, Dclliiitionof (}44 I'linisliiiii'iit of 044 Atti'innt ti> ('(iniiiiit 045 Ciirimlly knowing female idiotH ' (UO De(lliiiKKii'l« under fourteen. 040 DniKKinK fenuile.s to detile tlieni 010 RECElVIXt? Property obtniiied l)y indict- able oin-nce 040 Property obtained by non-in- dictable oll'eiice 040 Stolen Postal matter 040 After restoivition to owner 04.S When complete (547 HKCOONTZAXCK Of bail, Kenerally 224, 243 Of Hail, on remand. . .atl, 2^5, :K(2 Breach of 201 Of Bail after committal ..22(i, 227 To i)rosecute or give evidence 222,240, 241, 270, :«i Of Prosecutor binding him.self to prosecute after dismissal of charge 221, 238 Certificate of non-ai)pearance ofja defendantdischarged on 349 On appeal from summary con- viction or order 331, 393 Need not be estreated in cer- tain cases 413 Sale of lands under estreated. 413 Discharge of forfeited 414 Render of accused by surety in dischai'ge of 409 Discharge of 40}) Entry of forfeited 410 PMceedings upci forfeited... 412 S|M!ial provisirMs as to Que- btjc with regard to 413 417 Tqjkeep the peace 42!! RECORD in Speedy Trials. .209, ..281, 282 RECORDER in Montreal or Quebec may preside over General or Quarter Sessions 82 REMAND, Powers of.. IIMJ, 2!X?, „ • • • 302, 329 tor three days may be verbal, 200 Cannot be for more than eight clear days 199 Accused niaj- be brought up before expiration of 201 Bail on 201, 233 Breach of Recognizance on' 201, 202 REPELLING Page trespasser 459 RESCUES 521, 522 RESERVED CASE, Statement of case for review on ques- tions of law ... . 277, 30:^-367 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIME. (See Agency) 440 (See (\>ji(tcify for Crhtic) 495 (See I(/noinii(r of fact) 371 (See Inan niti/) . .'. 575 (See Infi-nt)'. 580, 581 (See Parties to Crlmex) 58-04 RESTrTUTION of stolen pro- perty 271,273, 279, 305 RESTRAINT OF TRADE, Com- binations in ,300, 601 RETURNS Of summary convictions 372 Pul)lication"of ;i73 Defect ive 374 RIGHT AXD WRONG TEST, in insanity 575, 376 RIOT 480, 483 Suppression of 481 Xeclect to suppress 484 RIOT ACT, Reading of 483 RIOTOUS ACTS, Inciting In- dians to , 486 RIOTOUS DESTRUCTION... 484, 485 ROBBERY, Definition of 649 With violence 050 Assault with intent to commit 650 Stopping Mail with intent to rob or search it 652 SAILORS, Entiiement of, to desert 440 Receiving necessaries of 449 (See Army and Navy) SALE Of Adulterated food 539 Of fertilizers ... 541 Of intoxicating liquor witliout license 582, 586 Of ob.scene matter 438 Of offices 488 Of poisons by unqualified per- sons 640 Of things unfit for food 541 704 PRACTICAL GUIDE T(t MA0I8TRATEH. SANITY, I'AdK I'resuniplioii of 575 SCOTT ACT, (See Canada Tem- perance Act\ 595 SEAMEN, (See Army anil Navy) 44tt, 450 SEARCH-WARRANT Iiifornmtioii for 117, 140 Genenil form of 140 Caution to be used in execut- inK 1^1 Disposal of tliingH .seized un- der IIH, 110 To search houses of ill-faine. 12:3 To search for mined gold, cic. 122 To search ganung liouses, l)et- ting houses and lotteries... 124 To searcli for vagrants 130 SEARCH Eor detained lumber 122 For fish talten in violation of the Fisheries Act I'M For game by game guardians. 132 For Intoxiciiting liquor in N. W. T., and Keewatin 131 For intoxicating li(^uor and weapons near public works. 131 For, and seizure of intoxicat- ing liquor on H. M.'s sliips.. 123 For intoxicating liquors by members of N. W. Mounted Police Force 131 For public stores 121, 122 Of foreign vessels hovering in British waters 130 Of vessels by harbor police . . . 133 Of any car truck or vehicle for transporting cattle 133 Under the Animal Conta- gious Diseases Act 133 Under the Fugitive Offenders' Act 130 Under the Seatnen's Act. ... . 132 Under the Wreck and Salvage Act 130 SECURITY FOR COSTS may be ordered to be given by the prosecutor 221 SEDITIOUS OFFENCES (J52 SEDUCTION Of or illicit connection with girls between 14 and Ifl 652 of female passengers. 653 Of ward, servant, etc 653 Under promise of marriage. . . 653 SEIZURE, Fraudulent 550 SEIZFHE. I'AGK Stealing things under 662 SELF- DEFENCE 456, 6t4 SERVICE OF SUMMONS 107, 108, 193 SET riNG SPRING GUNS 054 SHERIFF, Duty of, under pro- visions as to speedy trial . . . 268 SHIPS Casting away or destroying. . . 621 Preventing saving of w-lien wrecked 654 Sending or taking unsea- worthy ship to sea (J54 In.spect ion of 571) SHIPWRECKED PERSON, Preventing the saving of. . 654 SHOOTING With intent to murder 566 With intent to wound iSee W'ounding) 672 Pointing a tire-arm 632 At H. M's vessels 672 (See Assaidts on the Queen). . SMUGGLERS, (See Offensive weapons) 632 SODOMY, (See Abominable Crime) 431 SOLDIERS, (See Army and Navy) 446 SPEEDY TRIALS of indictable offences 267-285 SPIRITUOUS LIQUORS, (See Intoxicating Liquor). STATEMENT Of accused 212, 213, 237 Of case for review on points of law 277,363, 367 STEALING, (See Theft). STEALING from the person ... 662 STEAMBOAT INSPECTION. 579 STENOGRAPHY, Depositions may be taken by 202 STRANGLING (See Attempt to Murder) 566 GENERAL INDEX. •705 STUFKFYIXr. PA(ii; (Si-c Adininlsteriny Dru(in, and Hi'e Murder 43a, 505 SUBOHNATIOX of perjury. . , 030 SUMMARY ARREST, Powers of iMM)5 SUMMARY TRIAL Of indictable odeiices 2H7-:iOH Of juvenile od'enders 3(K)-;{0H Of nonindietable ofleiice.s.. 310-343 SUMMARY JURISDICTION Is absolute over certain in- dictable oH'enees in certain cases 281», 2i)0 SUMMONS In indictable cases 107, 294 Form of I37 Service of 108 Proof of service of 108 Form of deposition of service 141 To a witness 103, IMi, 319 i orm of. 22t) In non-Indictable cases 325 SUNDAY Prohibition of certain sales on a55 Sale of intoxicating liquors on 589, 590 Warrants may be issued and executed on 110 SURETIES FOR THE PEACE. ft55 SURRENDER OF FUGITIVE for extradition 074, 675 TABLE OF Indictable offences 251-200 Noprindlctable offences 403-408 TELEGRAMS, Sending false. . . 537 TELEGRAPHS, TELEPHONES, etc.. Damaging or destroy- ing 621 TENANTS IN COMMON 508 TENANT, Theft by 604 TENDER OF PAYMENT, on (listress warrant 372 TERRITORIAL DIVISION de- fined 310 TERRITORIAL LIMIT of colo- nial power (See Bigamy).. . . 478 TEST OF LEGAL INSAN- ITY Pahi.; . 575 Til EFT Animals capable of being stolen 050 Hringing stolen propertv into Canada ' (jfl;^ Hy conversion ((.57^ 658 My husband or wife when living apart 072 Hy taking (557, [m I'ellned 057 l!i a dwellii'g-house o<>;{ Is simple or aggravated 058 Not otherwise provided for. m\ Of lost things (HK), (ioi Of things under s izure (!(t2 Or stealing from the person . fl()2 Si)ecillc acts of 002 Things capable of being stolen. 056 THREATENING LETTERS... 065 THREATS Compelling execution of docu- ments by (504 Compulsion by 505 Demanding with intent to steal 004 To accuse of crime. . 06.5, 66(3, 007 (See Extortion} 5,S() (See Rot»hery) 049 TIME, Limitations of 05-72 TITLE TO LANDS, Justices not to try questions of ..32, 33, 312 TRADE COMBINATIONS Between masters or work- men 500 The purposes of a trade union not unlawful by bein j mere- ly in restraint of trade 505 TRADE MARKS 667 TRADE UNION 505 TRAINING. (See Drilling.) TRANSMISSION Of conviction to Appeal Court 359 Of conviction of juvenile of- fender 305 Of documents on committal for trial 223, 224 Of recognizances.. 201, 30.5, ;W9, 415 TRANSPORTATION of cattle l>y rail or water 515 TREASON (iOT (108 Accessories afrer the fact to . CiiO 70(J I'RACTICAL OUIPE To MAOISTKATKS. TREAS()NAUI,K CON Vm>k SPIHACY tl(Ht THKASONAHLK OKKKNCKS. (HHt (Sei' .{still lilts oil till- Qiiiiii) . 1(15 (Seo ('oiis/iiriirj/ to J iithiiiiliitr (I Li'i/isliitiiir) itiW (Sen l.ri-yiiig War) tlirt THKSI'ASS. Defeiiceof projaMty (iKiiiiist irrtt TRIAL t'oiiimittiil for 1121 Of juvenile oHeiiderM :«Mt HOS Of ii«)nimlietiil)le <iireiie .s.itlO, ;ti:t III a siiiiiiniin iimniier, uf eer- til in iiulietnlije oU'eiiees 287 Of perHOiis under sixteen must lie separate 2'll, :t01, :t02 (See Spreily 'J'rials). TWO OFFKNCrCS ncn to he cliarKed in iiifonnatiun nr coinplaiiit for non-indietabie offence HU, :n5, HIO UNHORN CHILD, KilliiiK 4H2 UNITED STATES AND CANADA Extradition between 07ft List of ottences extraditalile between «7fl, «77 UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLIES . 480, 482 UNLAWFUL DRILLING 520 UNLAWFUL OATHS 435 UNNATURAL OFFENCE 431 UNSEA WORTHY SHIP, Send- ing or taking to sea 654 UNWHOLESOME FOOD, Sell- ing 541 UTTERING Counterfeit coins 511, 512 Forgeries 547, 548 VAGRANCY 670, 671 VARIANCE Adjournment in case of 103 Between charge made and evide ce taken at prelimi- nary enquiry, immaterial. . . ■. 105, 192 Between charge and evidence ill summary trials not ma- terial and may be amended. 318 VESSEL FAdio (See>7i/y*.s» (to4 VEXATlOlh ACTIONS 5(1-53 VIEW ; iiiit pennisHilile liy a Jildne ill case of a trial without a Jury 277 WACERS (See IMtiiifi iiiiil I'ool-svUiin)) 173 (See also .liirisilirtion to sum- iiiari/j/ til/ rcrfitiii hiiliit- (ih/i lill'iii'rcs 2K0 WAREIIOI'SK RECEIPTS, (iiving or using false 560 WARRANT, Arrest witlumt 1KM)5 Hacking of ll.=i, 110, 314 Disixt.sal of person arrested on endorsed 115 Duty of nei'son arresting with or without warrant 01) Execution of 1(X( For witness 193, 195, 310 In cases of offences coniniitted within the Adniiraltv juris- diction 100, 107 Justification of arrest with- out 95, 97 Justificatiou of arre-st under lawful HI May be issued and executed on a Sunday .)r holiday 110 Not to be signed in blauK 101> Of committal for trial 221 For apprehension of fugi- tive witli a view to extra- dition 073, ()77 Of committal for extradi- tion 674, 077 To apprehend a person under the Fugitive Offender's Act. 079 Of commitment' for not find- ing sureties for the peace. . 420. 424 Of commitment of witness re- fusing to be sworii or to give evidence -. . . . 198, 199 Of commitment of witness re- fusing to be bound over to give evidence , . . . 223 Of commitment on summary conviction. 340, 347, 385,387, 380, 391, 396 Of Coroner 110, 117 Of remand of defendant when distress is ordered 348 Of deliverance of a person bailed 228 Of distress. 346, 347, 3(53, 383, 384, 300, 395 # riENEMAI, WAHHANT |»A,)i.; I'rotcctidii ill ('iiH«' of uiTi'.st of wrniiK pernoii \\\\ Protect idii of person t-xccut- iiiKim'nuliir Ill I'rotection of pcrHoii excut- iiiK uiiiilliorizcd 112 l{«Miiaii(liiiK H iirisoiier. .ll)l», 2;m, am To iipprcluMid (tut of the pro- vine,' H witiiuss diKobeyiiiK snlipn'iwi 11)5 To apprclii'ii;! iii d coniniit witnesH for iioii-iittcii(Iiincf ^ _ lit MjM iMJy trial 2H(), liK'J, 2K4 To arirst a person clmrKt'il Willi an iiKlicialilc odcnce. . 10t< To arrest a juvenile olleiider. . :)()! To arrest a witness rop noii- attendance ;{(C1 To convey before a Justice of ^ allot lier district \(fA To search for deserters i((7 (See Siarc/i W'arnnifn). WATKR. Hreach of contract to supply ais tonveyaiice of cattle by 515 WKAI'ONS (See Otfriisire IVeapoiiH) H;<1, fl;« WKKIHTS AND MEASURES. (172 WIFE, t;onipetent to testify for liusband '..... 2M Compulsioii of 5()4 Theft by, from husband 072 (See Mninfrnanct) 615, ((1(J WILD ANIMALS, Kept in a cage, are not domestic 513 WITCHCRAFT 54H WITNESS Cases in which tlie evidence of one witness must be cor- rolKJrated 204, 211 Commitment of witness re- fusing to be examined. . .198, 109 DepositTlon that a person is a materia] 245 Evidence of, may be on oath . or afBrmation 205, 324, 325 Evidence of, at preliminary enquiry 202 interest or crime no bar to competency of 204 Manner of taking depositions o' 202, 203 INDKX. 707 WIT.NKSS |.^„K .May he comniitted for refus- iiiK to be bound over 223 .May be compelled to give in- criiiiinatinK answers 525 May, if a foreigner, testify through an interpreter '. 200 .Modes of adniiiiisleringoath , f"' ; tm, 200 I'rocuring attendance of a prisoner as a 11)5 Siiiiiiiions for '. . 103 Taking evidence, under coni- nii-sion, of a sick witness ,,. v. ••.■, IIHI, 107 taking evidence,- under com niission, of u witness outof Canada kjh Warrant for, after silm »^w\s. l),;^^ 11,4 Warrant for, in llrst in- •^''I'K'c 105 W ITXKSSEH Attendance of, at prelinii- narveminiry 193 For the defence 2IO Expediency of defendant call- " iiig witnes.ses, at prelimin- ary eiKjuiry 217 Procuring attendance or wit- " nesses beyond the province. 105 In speedy trials 2K) In summary trials of indict- able oHenders 203^ In trials of juvenile offenders. 303; Summons or warrant to,— in summary cases 319 WOMEN, Defilement of 516 WORKMEN. (See Trade Com - binationa) 505, gflfl WORKS OF ART, Distribution of, by lot, by art society, is not a lottery 012 WORSHIP, Disturbing 672 WOUNDING 672 Public officers 672 With intent to maim ff72 With intent to murder 566 WRECKING 621 YOUNG CHILD Evidence of 2II Consent of, in cases of defile- ment, immaterial 428, 429- 46 PRINTKD BV THR GAZKTTK PKINTINO COMPANY, MONTRKAL. iff