IMAGE EVALUATION
TEST TARGET (MT-3)
1.0
I.I
1.25
;.? * iiiJi
14 II 1.6
Photographic
Sciences
Corporation
/
o
W.r
Vx
S.
a?
i\
^V
^^A
^9)
'#^;^^:'
^ ^-^ ^^^4^
^
'\y\^ # '
23 WEST MAIN STREET
WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580
(716) 872-4503
i
'if
■^
L
signifie "A SUIVRE", le
symbols V signifie "FIN".
Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre
filmAs A des taux de reduction diffArents.
Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre
reproduit en un seul clichA, il est film* A partir
de I'angle supArieur gauche, de gauche A droite,
et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre
d'images nAcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants
illustrent la mAthode.
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
-— '^
THE COST
•1^
-Ol' TME»
Nakusp and Slocan Railway
PCS SinZORN TO BY ENGINEERS.
And compared with the Cost of Other Railways.
i
A Return brought clown to the House on
the 27th of March, 1894, in reference to the
cunstructiiin of the \aku-.ip ..V SI. Mrt.ilhvray^
wliich was for all the bonds of the Company
and contained a marked cheipie for $112,000.
" Three other lenders were opened, one for
$20,000 per mile in bonds and $5,000 in paid
«p slock of ihe '."ompany , one for $25,000 in
lxmd^ and $4,000 in paid up slock ; and one
for $20,000 in Urnds \K-t mile, none of which
cc:np!ieil wilh the form of lender issueil, or
Were ."ccc>mpanied by eillier chcfpie or deposit,
nnd which consctpiently could not receive con-
sideration. The U.-it mentioned tender was
)nime<1iately withdrawn after receipt.''
MR. IUTMESNAY's E'^IIMAIP..
Mr. Dnrhe^nny, civil engin««r, apptfintiftl
\jy the C. I*. R. to examine the line and report
on the cc^l, Mates a^ follow? in his al^itiavil :
** My estimate for the several 48
" From ticaJ St.viin I.iikc lo \VilM->n Crrfk, '
5S i"tlc« I'' $I4,JJ4 -jKiii
'* Fri>m WiliMut CriH-k to Three P»)rk», H}^
miles w< $ji,7'o >ui,6io
$57'*." I
*• Mf.in avtrajfe ,(8 tiijl«t ti.att
"This estimate was exchi-*ive of all rolling;
stiick, efpiipment, and plant whatever.
*' This was the eslimaie which I comniuni-
cak'd to Mr. Abbott, and in pre)>arin^ the
Mime I went upon the assuniptiun. from (he
vuircc iif my instructions, that the ('anadi.in
I'ncific Railway (onij>any pru(niM.'d thenisclvcs
to bi^iM the road aH they ha-l dxnr in the case
of the ("ohmibia and KjMitenay Railway, of
which I had U-en ihe Kn^vu-cr in charj;e of
corislrucliiin. The al»ove eslimale (a» men-
tioned in a telejjram from Mr. AblM>tt lo Mr.
Van Home on the jr 1 now do,
that a margin of 15 )K-r cent shouhl be allow
cfl t'} covi-r any omissions in my rstimate anortalion anerintendent of the Pacific Division *jf the
C. P. R., are the foHnwing : — ;
*' We found the work nfconsttucliont «o far
a.s it had pro^resKed, to Ik.- well done, and
such as would Itc, in our opinion, accepi.able
lo the Canadian Pacific Railway t'ompany for '.
opt-ration, ami up to the siantlard retptired by
the Dominion (".overnment regulations for a
subsidized rond in a mineral country. So '\\r
as insiit.'cted the j;radienis antl curvature are,
, in my opinion, not excessive, and are Ihe best
I the country will allow within reasonable limit!. 1
of expcndiuirc in consiruition. >
" I am lamiliar with the estimate made by
Mr. liuchcsnay, ami in my itpinion the total i
cost as placed by him al $6^*4, 054 was a mo*i- i
crate estimate even undtr the favorable con-
(liiitms which he mentions as intUiencing him |
in its preparation.
"I submit, for thi- ptiritosc of comparison,
the relative cost uf the Mission Itrauch of the
( '.madian Pacific Kailv\ ay and of 'he ( oljmhia
Kipn.iy Railway, l»oth of which were erm-
strucietl by the Canadian P.tcilii- Railway, and
invler the iinme-|>)utid rails, which are bein^; taken oH .
sections of the ntain line where we have heavy
(raOic and where lar^e locomotives are in use
for the pur|>o>e of being replaced by 72-;M>und
raits, and in this matter ihe Nakusp and Slo-
can Railway is Ikcint^ (rented in an exactly :
(Columbia and Koixenay, and the Arrow I^ke
Hranch."
(Osr OK IIIF. MISSION- HRANCH. i
t'lenriiin. Wwl'hiitK', ^nulinK, irrstlf* and
Friis«-r Ki»cr Sii^.tp-'i i.S
Tmvk, iMlIasliriK, ei>Ki (roni the Canadian Pacific Railwav.
anake.
' "I also maile an estiinale of the cost of a
line frim Nakusp to Three Forks, which was
in excess of the estima(e made by Mr. Duch-
esnay, C.K., with which I am fannliar, but
this excess is principally due to dilTererit sjieci-
ficotions. t however, ihoroii^;hly agree with
the estimate under which .Mr. Duchesnay
places the total cost at $664,954, and llie
average cost per tnile at $17,497, under the
favourable conditions whicli he niention.s .as
influencing him in its preparation."
rosr OF RAM, WAYS KI.SF.UIIKRK.
It will be interesting lo note what the cost
' i)f some of the princip.il railways in (^'anaiia
was. The Star .\Imanac for 1S94 gives a
table showing the co^t \n:r mdc, U»th aciunl
and theoretical (estimated), in 1802. Ro aig
>t exelimitc of the bridge iter«>HN
KiS'l«'in\ Kiwr ■$t.'(8.,s84 .-7
Trnek. biill<. ■tniK« cnfiiKertn|[ aitJ inei-
t'riit.ll expi-iisi-* ■ ,. j«),(vji iH
lliiilJiiiKS M-- 4.^>7 !*('
Totid fo»i ft ilu* r.iiJMn^ rnaJx tor I r.-»lK*".
r%<.lu«iw <>l tbi- l( Sji.iKi.ih per mili
not imlvKting hridifi- .lero^k K>H>ifii.-iy Ki\»T.
Ccrtificsl ii'rnxl
J. I) TOWNI.KY.
.Aeei'tintaiil. P.-u-itie I>i»isior», '.'. P. K \
cd i|^^»^^
4
i'^i'
Si
^i ??S2?*°f-'?'*:H* ;?t* C: '-*
Milr.iK^'- "*■ iNiiJ*' '•' •* Ci»«l 01 $i (.(u5.7i pir mile.
titU iiicluiiiit^ nillintr ntivk t>r tbc bridK*^ nvriMk^ the
Pmaer Rimt.
Certified eorrret.
J. I). TOWM.FV.
Aecouiitaitt, pAcifie Poikiou, C P R'v.
*
■y I L-^ i^
X
11 j|:i1iJl
s
j.i t;i^s E^x i-^-t s;
/.
*y •j'jolUJi.Eli^/'.l.i.
Ji
m
t-3
I'OST Oh IJIF ttoKIli'- KAIIWAVS.
MuIh.nH's Dicnon.Trv "f Sliitiviii". j;ivt-!. iht
Utta\ ini)tra|;c .tihI cost of ronstrmtion fnr
Kinope nnHI.P.
l."o*I r.-r
I'.t^t p.'r
Mil.'>.
Mllr.
M.k...
.Mile.
S40 ...
l.(»79
A'.l.....u
I-.S'.S
t:.,f.Xa.
850. ..
14.465
.7.Hi«i
■».(■.<-«
I.).H
fl6o.
II.HHa
N..J.)1)
l6.,i,4^H<
SK,i
i(ii,7i.j
'1.7'">
"H.44..
17.«'
WOI
t,n>.i«..»
1 1. 1'"'
IVt.iio
il'.UH'
WIIAI MB. Sir.WAH' SAVS.
Ml. v\, K. Stewart, civil engineer, al (»fes*nl
in charge of the Arrow Ijtke limtich erf the C.
P. R.f and one of the most tareful Stid ex
[wrienccd railway en)(>neen in Canadli, says :
The same authoitty for .1 ix-riml lietween
1887 and iSSS gives the average cost of con
structioii \K-t mile fni (he Cni(ed Mates al
t'l2,^^x) ; f"r Australia, I'o.^itx* ; and fctr
Sou[h Africa, £8,900.
The above figures will give a g