IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I IIIM IIIIM ilia 11^ 2.0 1.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 ^ 6" — ► V] <9 /} el. <mA. m r #i V^ c>1 em -y O ^/. 7 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY, 14580 (716) 872-4503 ^\^ <^^<^ % ^\' 'V- ,^" 6= C?, w- w. o^ CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHM/ICMH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques 1980 Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibiiographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual method of filming, are checked below. L'Institut a microfilm^ te meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a 6X6 possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. □ Coloured covers/ Couverture de couleur □ Covers damaged/ Couverture endommag^e □ Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaurde et/ou pellicul^e I I Coloured pages/ Pages de couleur v/ /, Pages damaged/ Pages endommagdes □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurdes et/ou pellicul6es □ Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque □ Coloured maps/ Cartes g^ographiques en couleur n Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) I — T/Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ I !j Pages d^color^es, tachet^es ou piqu^es [7f Pages detached/ Pages d^tach^es I I Showthrough/ Transparence □ Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur □ D Bound with other material/ Reli6 avec d'autres documents Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La reliure serree peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distortion le long de la marge intdrieure Blank leaves added during restoration may appear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajoutdes lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont pas 6t6 film^es. n D Quality of print varies/ Quality in6gale de I'impression I I Includes supplementary material/ Comprend du materiel supplementaire Only edition available/ Seule Edition disponible Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, etc., ont 6t^ film6es d nouveau de fagon d obtenir la meilleure image possible. D Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl^mentaires: ^ 10X This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est filmd au taux de reduction indiqud ci-dessous. 14X 18X , 22X 26X 30X 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: L'exemplaire film6 fut reproduit grSce d la g6n6rosit6 de: :ails du }difier une nage ' University de Sherbrooke The images appearing here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and in keeping with the filming contract specifications. University de Sherbrooke Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le plus grand soin, compte tenu de la condition et de la nettetd de t'exempiaire filmd, et en conformity avec les conditions du contrat de filmage. Original copies in printed paper covers are filmed beginning with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impression. Les exemplaires originaux dont la couverture en papier est imprimde sont film^s en commenpant par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires originaux sont filmds en commenpant par la premidre page qui comporte une empreinte d'impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par la dernidre page qui comporte une telle empreinte. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol — ^ (meaning "CON- TINUED "), or the symbol V (meaning "END "), whichever applies. Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: Un des symboles suivants apparaitra sur la dernidre image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: le symbole — ^ signifie "A SUIVRE", le symbole V signifie "FIN". Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent §tre film^s d des taux de reduction diffdrents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre reproduit en un seul cliche, il est film6 d partir de Tangle supdrieur gauche, de gauche d droite, et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants illustrent la m^thode. arrata to pelure, )n d D 32X 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 ■"iin' I 1 1 fi m mmm ' i ' . ' } <9 ^ ^ »■ ■ ■ ■ ' t rn w ■y- a MEMOIliS, n f I •v. INCIDENTS (t mailNISCKNCES or nil; kaim.v irisioiiv oi riii: NE\\' CHURCH IX MICHIGAN, INDIANA, ILLINOIS, AXn AD.IACENT STATKS; AND CANADA, I IIY IIEV. (i. FIELD. ^ ^ jti/-<)j f collection H0UD6 >j TORONTO, Canada: II Causwki.i, .t Co. NEW YORK: E. U. Swixxkv. 20 Cooi-Kit Umox. London, E.\«;:,.vxi): Jamks Si-i:ihs, 36 Bloomsiriry .Stkkkt, W. C. 1879. '! ' ; T tZ f iU * •• t -^.<^^^^ .f (tl^ ' ^A a f TO THE IIEADEP.. In all prol>ability tlieie will bo two classes of persons who will read this hook,— whom we arc ficcnstoiiioa to dosif'nato as " Ol.l Chnrdi," and '• New Church :" hy the former we mean all those who are meinhors of . - heen trained and educated in the faith of,— or under the influence of, some of the various relij,'ious denominations into which the collective Christian world is (""ivided; -whether called Catholics or Protestants; Evanjielicai, Apostolical, Orthod.^x, or Heterodox ;— these heiuf,' hut sects, or parts of what was ori'jiually the one Christian, or Catholic Church; having in j^eneral a com- mon platform of Doctrine, and separating, or disintegrating mainly on some one particnlai- dogma of faith ; or on some n;ode of Church government. These an^ embraced by us in the one comiirehensive term " Oi-p CmiiCTi;" as contia-distinguished fiom those who are desigiuited by the term "Nkw Church." These latter not being a sect, or split, or division of that former, oi- original Church; but a A'c/r {■hun-h itsrn\aH distinct from the first Christian Church, as that was originally from the Jewish Church. Thus not separ- ating on account of a difference of belief on some one or more points of faith; but a complete and total difference, with almost nothing in common. For though we have precisely the same I'.ible, our understanding of it is tnto rc'h different from the universally prevailing one; being so much nioie full and comprehensive. And though we alike believe in a God,— a Spiritual world,— a Heaven and a Hell.— a Hesurrec »• IV TO THE T^EADER. tion and .Tiulgmciit, Ac, iVc. ; yet our iindorstiinding of tliofle tliiiif^H is HO widely diffcrfiit from tlie coinmoii ideas roHpcctiiifj them;— or perhaps it inij^'lit he iiioie correct to say, innit nf 'ulcdK, \h».i they couhl in no wise niinf,'lo : the one faitli heing positive,- the otlier httle more than ne^'utive, opinionative, or specnhitive. Nothinj^ hoin*,' known or helieved in, — in the Christian world at tin's day, tlum the simple fact that there in (I (loil: hut whether personal or impersonal ; visihle or invisi- hie; real or ideal, — nothing,' whatever is known; or even pro- fessed to he known:— the le<,'endary creeds present contrary and impossihle mystifications of llim us a tri-personal heinj;, and yet impersonal: — without form, "l)ody, parts, or pas- sions:" — as cominjj and f^oing, ascending, and descending from one place to another; and yet omnipresent. Whilst in regard to the Spiritual world, the most incongruous and inconsistent speculations : and impossihle and contradictory imaginings are all that the Church has to ol'fer to satisfy tlie requirements of her children ; so that those of intelligent and reflecting minds. re|)udiating such sophistical traditions as unsuhstantial food, hut too often hecome secret, or avowed sceptics and infidels. This is why those of the New Church have nothing in com- mon witli what they helieve to ho a Church that is Christian in name only ; and in consequence of which is now consum- mated ; and hence they see and acknowledge the need of a rational and consistent faith; one in which there will he no conflict with reason, science, or universal laws. And it is hecanse of this vastated and disrupted state of the Primitive Christian Church, that the houd, or ligature hy which influence ■; from God and Heaven might more effectually reach man ; to enlighten, strengthen and save him, that new revelations have been made : not new Scriptures written ; but the clouds of error and ignorance removed by which the Scriptures had been obscured ; and their true and living mean- ing restored; — a true idea of God made known, and His laws th,\ / TO TTIF, TlEAPKTl. T of providence and life: us also of the UeRurrection,— the T<ftst Judgment,- Heaven and Hell, and tlie life after death. Tl'.ese, like all previous revelations, it is believed, were made by, and tlin)n<,'li, % luunaii instrument, as tliey could be made in no other way : and we believe that instrument was Knianuo! Swedenbor^, whose writings bear the fullest and clearest evi- dence of the truth of his missir'n;— and it is because they do so, that we receive theMi. And the advent of tliis Church was foretold and epitomized more especially in the 21st chaiiter of the Revelation, i)y the symbolic iniaj^ery of tlie New Jerusalem as descendinff froni (lod out of Heaven. And we believe that this Church will be the crown of all the preceding Churches, and will endure for ever. And the Doctrines of this Cliurch are those which are ad vocated in this Boolv. lUit it must not bo thouj^'bt from this, that every one jiro/r'fxiiiii to receive them, dors rrdlhj rciwiri- tlit'in. Tiicy contain so uiuch. and rc(]iiire, not oidy that tlu; false and perverted habits of thinkinj^, l)elieviii;^ and actin;,', which have grown with our growth, and become strengthened and confirmed by liabit and association, should l)e given up; but that moie unsuUish, elevated, rational, and spiritual ideas should take their place; and the winkle mental fabric as it were, recast, so that tlie Divine prediction may be fultiiled, "Behold, I make all things new." And that those truths should be nuide practical in a life of Love, Charity, and Use. But who is there that cannot see how impossible it would be for this to be done at once ; and how unreasonable it would be to suppose that those who become interested in these heavenly doctrines, — who perceive and acknowledge their rationality and their harmony and consistency with all known truths, should at once have them fully embodied in their lives : it were as x'easouable as to suppose that as soon as a child is born, he becomes a full-grown man I He first receives them intellectually;— and this even but in part, and by degrees; vi TO TTTR nKAPTin. ypt ^'i'a(liiall.\- tlicy i-o-cast and ro-fonn the wliole lifo : but (liiriiif; this pi-occss tlic old is foi' ii lout,' tiino more or less eom- iniii^lcd witli the new; -mid tho iinw is often si'cn very ohHPurcIy ; and tlio old nuin often prevails over the new man; niid tor awliiie it ninst nerds lie so, during tliis transition state: and this will peihaps explain why many tliiu<»s are done hy profoHsin{:» New Chnrelimen that are l)y no moans illustrations of the Doctrines they profess; and may often seem even to tlirow discredit upon them. Whilst it is very different with those in whom these Doctrines have taken deeper root, and with whom the old is no lon<,'er minf,'led with the new. Much injury is often done to the cause of the New Clinrch hy self-confident men, who, with but a very shght and imperfect acquaintanee with its teachin<,'s, speak and act as if tiiey really knew and tmde:stood them ; and it may be that many things recorded in these reminiscences, that might seem to be (piestionable, oi- even mijust, may be accounted for in this manner. Perhaps, liowevei", tliis miglit be urged in ex- cuse of unjustifiable actions in any religious community; but the genuine test is in knowing what are the standards of faith and life which such religious lK)dies really teach: and I am not aware of a single Church in Christendom that has incor- ]);)i'ated into its Creed, eitlier the Doctrine of Clidritij : tlie J.tiir ()/■ Lore : or a TJJ'e o/ (/-.v. Tt is all F.vrrn, — F.uth AiiOXF, ; and even that, unhappily, a faith in what is not true; or in what could not l)e made practical in our daily life. And the practices of a Church ouglit not to be expected to be better than its principles. Whilst the Creed of the New Church teaches and declares that, " If 1 would be saved, I must shun all evils as sins against God; and live a life according to the Ten Command- ments." And "That Charity, Faith, and Good works are unitedly necessary to man's salvation ; since Charity without Faith, is not spiritual, but natural; and Faith without Charity (► .., '. ( c^ To TIIR nKAnKi;, VII is not livii.-, l,„t dc.ul; uiul In.th Cl.anty an.l I'uitl. without Good works arc merely .ueiital uiul perishable thiii««, because without use „v lixedness. And tliat n.-thiiit,' <»f Faith, of Charity, or of Good unrks, is of nmii ; but tliat all is of the Lord. a. 1.1 all tiio iiurit is Jlis aloj.e." Which is thus co.u- prelieiiHively eiuiuciated: "All i-eli^'ion has rehitiou to life; aud the life of religion is to do ;^ood." Some ai)olo^<y is due to the reader f<.i' the want of a better chronological order; and i)erhai)s liiore methodical urnii.^c- meut of these memoirs; all that I can oiler, is, that they were written at irref,'ular times, and often witii l, i<i inter\ais bi- tween ; and the scenes kept changing. Many places that >vere but small villages when these records commenced, have mucc become flourishing cities. A large portion too, of those whose uames are here given, have long since passed to their homes in the eternal workl. 1 have presented the best and most perfect statement of these early jnemories of New Church Uistojy in this region of the Western world, 1 have been able t.. do. 1 knew that if I did not, no one else could; as no other person had either the documents or the infornjation. I leave it as a legacy for the New Chuicli to read and reflect upon ; and may 1 also hope, to IHolit by. - (. j,,j^^^ DiiXltOIX, MltUIGAX. i I c I i m DA", PA I MEMOIRS, INCIDENTS AND REMINISCENCES OF THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE NEW CHURCH or MICHIGAN, INDUNA, ILLINOIS AND ADJACENT STATES; AND IN CANADA. AS no one person can, Trom his own knov.ledge, write a history of the New Church in the United States, whoever therefore may he its historian, he must depend to a great extent upon such informa- tion and materials as he mav be able to collect and compile from the labors of others ; and as such a history will certainly be required, I desire to con- tribute as much information as I may be able, in the region where I have labored, with a view to its being tributary thereto. There is very little that is reliable left to us of the early history of the Christian Church, at least during the first century, except what is written in the Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, and the Epistles. But those records are justly regarded as unspeakably precious; and there can be no good reason to suppose but that in the ages to come 2 PAUL S TRIBULATIONS. much value will be attached to the detail of those events which narrate and describe the state of the human mind in regard to religious subjects, the manner in which the doctrines of the New Church were received, and the mode of their promulgation by its earliest preachers and missionaries: and though none of us may be able to recount, with the apostle Paul, that we have been flagellated with stripes, as he was; nor to say, as he does, "Thrice was I beaten with rods; once was I stoned; thrice I suffered shii^wreck; a night and a day I have been in the deep;" or have been as he was, "in j)erils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by his own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, and in perils among false breth- ren : " or, like him, "In weariness and painfulness ; in watchings often ; in hunger and thirst ; in fast- ings often ; in cold and nakedness." Nor could we thus, even though so disposed, ,"take pleasure," as he did, "in infirmities, in reproaches, in neces- sities, and in distresses:" for, not only do we live under a different form of government, but the state of the times is changed. Still, though we have been subject to no such dangers as the Apostles and Disciples were, in the commencement of the Christian era, there are yet many events connected with the first promulgation and establishment of the Church of the New Jeru- salem, at least in this western region, that are not devoid of interest, or tame for want of opposition; and the experience of many years has convinced ^ t, HOW NEW TRUTHS ARE RECEIVED. a f me — however encouraging the appearances may sometimes be, that the field of the human mind is ripe for the reception of truth, spiritual and divine truth, and that the world is eager for a religion which teaches it, that such an appearance is not real. Multitudes may indeed be attracted by some- thing new and rational, and be interested for a time by the beauty of the truth of the New Church; but the feeling is in general evanescent .and ephemeral, and is soon succeeded by indiffer- ence and neglect. But in the winnowing of this chaff, it is often found that a few grains of wheat are left, yet out of the thousands who for a time have sat and listened with satisfaction to the doc- trines of the New Church, how few, how very few, have received them with gladness, and remained stedfast to their convictions. But an opening has been made, and the way prepared in the wilderness, for the time when *' the plowman shall overtake the reaper," and more ex- tensively prepare the way for "the treader of grajjes to succeed him who soweth the seed." The spread of the doctrines of the New Church seems to have followed the pathway of the sun. Of their first reception in the Eastern States I have no personal knowledge. My first acquaintance with its members was in the city of New York in the year 1836, at which time I was received as a member of the Society meeting for worship in the chapel on Pearl street. There were then about a dozen persons, mostly t DEPARTURE FOR THE WEST. English, members of the New Church, who used occasionally to meet socially at the house of Mr. Purcell or Mr. Slade, on a Sunday afternoon or evening, and talk over the affairs of the Church,, and our duties in relation to it ; but we had na hired room or any kind of public meetings. About this time I first became acquainted with Mr. Henry Weller, who afterwards identified him- self with the New Church in the West. Mr. W. was then a member of a Unitarian Society in England, calling themselves " Free-thinking Christians," and knew nothing, and seemed to care nothing,, about Swedenborg or his writings. During the summer of this year (1837) I removed to Glen Cove, L. I., where I delivered a number of lectures on the- Doctrines of the New Church, in the school-house of that village. In the Fall of the following year, I left Long Is- land with the intention of going to Illinois ; but on my arrival in Detroit, November 5th, 1838, 1 found that all the steamboats for Chicago were laid up for the winter ; and as there was no railroad going west further than Ypsilanti (27 miles), I concluded to remain in Detroit till the Spring. At this time I did not know of a single receiver of the New Church Doctrines in that city, nor indeed in the whole State ; but Mrs. Dorr* must at that time have been living at Springwells, in the vicinity of the city ; and there were perhaps in all about half a dozen professed believers in the Doctrines in Michigan. f^rn ' * Mrs. Dorr has siuce, removed to the spiritual world. /- ^ A NEW CHURCHMAN FOUND. t» I left Detroit somewhat earlier than I had at £r8t intended, having suffered myself to be allured and brought into the wilderness ; though I did not sing there as in the days of my youth, but rather realized the sentiment of the poet who says : " Foud hope is theirs by fancy fed, Least pleasing when possessed." For it was here, that by a singular course of events, I was again brought into relationship with Mr. Henry Weller, in whose society I lived for a few months, and during which time Mr. Weller was in- •duced to read and investigate the Doctrines of the New Church, and finally to profess his full accept- ance of them. We were then residing in Calhoun County, Michigan (between Marshall and Battle •Creek). But my situation not being at all congenial in the place, I did not long remain ; though during the time of my sojourn here, I lectured frequently •on the Doctrines of the Church in the neighboring school-houses, and by this means became acquaint- ed with an old gentleman living near Marshall, a farmer, who for many years had been a profess- ed receiver of the Doctrines — (Mr. Jacob King), — and formerly a member of Dr. Beer's congregation, in Danby, in the State of New York. This was the first person I had found, or even heard of, in the State of Michigan, who made a profession of this belief. In the Fall of the year 1840, I removed to the village, now the city, of Battle Creek, only six miles "distant, where I soon commenced giving Lectures mmmmm^mfmim^ 6 A SOCIETY FORMED IN DETROIT. on the Doctrines of the Church, and holding meet- ings for worship on the Sabbath ; soon after which I learned, to my great surprise, that there was a small New Church Society in Detroit, and meetings for worship held every Sabbath. Little more than 18 months had elapsed since I left that city. Still, up to this time, I had not heard of there being a single receiver of the doctrines living there. But I afterwards learned, that very soon after I left Detroit, others had come to live there from distant places ; and that the Eev. Holland Weeks, of Henderson, Jefferson Co., in the State of New York, being on a visit in the city, an application was made to him, signed by seven persons, to in- stitute them into a Society, in accordance with the Eules of the Convention ; and that accordingly, on the 25tli day of August, 1839, in an upper room, at the house of Mr. Nathan Goodell, in the city of Detroit, they were so instituted and organized.* A constitution was drawn up, adopted, and signed by the 'following persons, viz.: * This was more tliau two years before the first New Church Society was instituted iu lUinois, which was in Canton, Fulton Co., iu that State. This latter Society was instituted by Rev. Dr. Lemuel Belding, of Lo Kaysville, Pennsylvania, October lOtb, 1841 consisting of thirteen members. Six of whom were at that time baptized, as also were eight infants. The Holy Supper was administered to the Society by Eev. L. Belding who also preached a sermon from Rev. xix. 7. On the day previous, two other sermons had been preached ; one from Mai. iii. 16, and the other from the 11th chap, of Mark. The above Society in Detroit was formed a little less than two months after the institution of the Illinois Association, — See paye 12. WHO CONSTITUTED IT. re u Edwin Burnham, now deceased. Elizabeth K. Burnham. Justus Dobbin, now deceased. George Bigelow, now deceased. Robert H. Murray, now deceased. Mary F. Bout vvell, (afterwards Mrs. Murray,) re- moved to Cahimet, 111. Hannah M. Goodell, since of Green Bay, Wis. There were also present, — Mrs. S. M. H. Dorr, a resident of Detroit, but a member of the Boston Society ; Mrs. Ann H. Adams, a member of the Hender- Bon (N. Y.) Society, then on a visit ; Mr. E. D. Fisher, since of Yarmouthport, Mass.; now deceased ; and one or two other friends. At this meeting Mr. Murray and Mrs. Boutwell were baptized into the faith of the New Church, the others having previously been so baptized. William B. Boutwell, aged four years, son of Mrs. B., was also baptized. The Holy Supper was then administered to the above adult members- of the Church by the Rev. Holland Weeks. The same evening, Mr. Edwin Burnham was for- mally elected Leader and Secretary of the Society ; after which Mr. Weeks preached a sermon from John vi. 15, at the City Hall, to an audience, res- pectable both as to numbers and character ; and notice was given that meetings for worship would be held regularly on the Sabbath, at 11 a.m., at the house of Mr. N. Goodell. The names of Mr. and Mrs. E. D. Fisher and Miss Jane Bamlett, "were soon after also signed to the constitution. 8 MR. ABIEL SILVER. i This was the first organized form of the New Church in Michigan, or so far west of Cincinnati. A short time after the organization of this So- ciety, Mr. Abiel Silver of Edwardsburgh (Mich), who was then engaged in mercantile pursuits, hav- ing occasion frequently to visit Detroit for the pur- chase of goods, soon formed a business acquaint- ance with Mr. Edwin Burnhara; and Mr. S. hav- ing a short time previously lost his left arm, Mr. B. one day, — after their business had been dis- posed of, — enquired of him what his sensations were in regard to the arm he had lost, — this led to an extended and interesting conversation concern- ing man's spiritual body, awakening in Mr. S. a desire to know more on this subject, and that of the spiritual world ; — the result of which was, — Mr. Silver borrowed some of Swedenborg's works to read ; — but so new, — so peculiar, — and so differ- ent from those of the Episcopal Church in which he had been educated, — was everything which he found in those books, that though delighted beyond measure with them, it was a long time bef3re he would even let his wife know what he was reading ! But eventually she became equally interested, and equally recipient of these heavenly Doctrines ; and who can tell what may be the results growing out of this comparatively unimportant event ; or how little did Mr. S. think, when the knife with which he was pruning his apple tree slipt and cut the artery in his wrist ; or when the Doctor so bung- lingly tied it up, that it mortified, and his arm had to be cut off above the elbow to save his life, that I •-i AND OTHER RECEIVERS. 9 it would be the means of leading him to a know- ledge of Doctrines of faith and life that he had •scarcely even heard the name of before, — much less that he would, as a result growing out of this •apparent misfortune, himself become an honored minister of the Lord's New Church, and the moans •of leading so many others into the gates of the New Jerusalem. Is it not true, in a good sense, as well as in a bad one, *' Behold how great a matter a little fire kindleth ? " How wonderful is ■the providence of the Lord. The Society at Detroit continued to hold their meetings at the same house during the Fall and "Winter succeeding their organization ; Mr. E. Burnham officiating as their Leader, and also as "the Instructor of a small Sunday School of some •seven or eight children. The Book of Worship and the Hymns of the Thiladelphia Liturgy, were used l)y the Society. "The only accessions to their number during this "time were Mr. John T. Little, Mr. S. Y. Atlee, and Mr. and Mrs. E. D. Fisher. In June, 1841, l)etween forty and fifty dollars worth of books were received from Boston for sale, which were quickly •disposed of, Mr. Hans Thielson, then of Dexter (47 miles W. of Detroit), an Engineer on the Michigan 'Central R. R., who was becoming interested in the Doctrines, purchased many of them. It was in August, 1830, when Rev. Holland Weeks first visited Detroit, instituted the Society, and preached to them, and in a little more tlian two .years after, they were again gladdened by the 10 DR. BELDINO IN DETROIT. presence of another New Church Minister. On the 24th Septemher 1841, Rev. Lemuel C. Beld- ing, of Leraysville, Penn., then on a missionary yisit to IlHnois to institute a Society at Canton (under the auspices of the Central Convention), — arrived at Detroit ; (see note on page 6) ; — and on the following day he preached in the evening at the City Hall, from Ex. iv : 1-4. The next day (Sunday), J)i\ B. preached again at the same place, in the afternoon, to ahout 800 persons, and in the evening to between four and five hundred. In the morning Divine worship was held at the house of Mr. E. D. Fisher, who, together with his> wife. Miss Jane Bamlette, and Mr. Little, were baptized, and received into tJio Society, and the Sacrament of the Holy Suj^per administered. This visit was received with peculiar satisfaction, and was a very happy and joyful one. In October of this year (1841), another package of books was. received from Boston, — nearly fifty dollars worth, some of which were sold at once, and the others placed in a book store for sale. Thus far did it seem that the prospects of the N. C. Society in Detroit were most encouraging ; — but how futile are all appearances, and how soon are all our fondest hopes dissipated and scattered to the winds. In May, 1840, Mr. and Mrs. Burn- bam left the State, to go and reside in Jefferson Co., N. Y. ; and Mr. Dobbin left the City to reside in Ann Arbor, (Mich.) to which place Mr. and Mrs- Murray had also removed. In September, 1841, Mrs. Goodell left Detroit for Green Bay, Wis. JABEZ FOX APPEARS. 11 And in May, 1847, Mr. and Mrs. Fisher removed to Oakland Co., 35 miles N. from Detroit, so that there was no male member of the Society left, residing in the city, and only about live or six females, as Mr. Little had also removed to Farmington (20 miles N.) Mr. Atlee not having joined the Society ; and Mr. G. Bigelow had removed to Springfield, Oakland Co., about forty miles N. — and finally not one was left of that recently pleasant and promis- ing little Society : the only member of the Church remaining, being Mrs. Dorr, who had never united with the Society, — but, as before stated, still re- tained her membership in the Boston Society. Here then, for a while I leave Detroit, and re- turn to Calhoun Co., about 120 miles west. I have previously stated that in the fall of 1840 I re- moved to Battle Creek, but some time previous, whilst lecturing at Marshall, a village twelve miles east of it, I learned that there had once resided there a young man by the name of Fox, who was a ** Swedenborgian," but that he was at that time down South (in South Carolina), althougli expect- ed to return before long. Mr. F. did return, and his history has since been very considerably in- terwoven with that of the New Church in this State. He is now known as the Ilev. Jabez Fox, Pastor of the New Church Society in Washington, D. C. I have already stated that soon after taking up my residence at Battle Creek, I learned to my surprise that there was a New Church Society in Detroit, and it was but a few weeks after this that I received a letter from Mr. E. D. Fisher, inform- 12 ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FORMED. ing me that Dr. Belding would pass through B. C. •OP the 28th of September, 1841 , on his way to Can- ton, Illinois, to institute a Society there. * I had not seen a N. C. Minister since leaving New York, and was eager again to meet one, so I left home the day before, and, for want of other conveyance, walked to Marshall (12 miles), to meet Dr. B. there. I arrived in the evening, and slept at the hotel ; then in the morning awaited the coming of the stage : there were several stages full of passen- gers, but in some way which I do not understand, they all passed through the village on their way * A little more than two years before this, a meeting had been held at this place (Canton), of the Readers and Eeoeivers of the Doctrines, for the purpose of forming and organizing the Illinois Association of the New Church. On the 3rd of June, 1839, a circular hud been issued for this purpose, signed by J. Young Scammon, of Chicago, and Jonas Eawalt and John F. Randolph, of Canton, inviting the mem- bers and friends of the New Church to meet at the above vil- lage for that purpose, on Saturday and Sunday, July the 6th jind 7th of the same year. This was accordingly done ; the meeting was held in the College Building, at which ten per- sons were present. Communications were also received and read from friends in Chicago, Alton, Farraington, Charleston, Bochester, Peoria, Petersburg!!, Darwin, Springfield, St, Charles, Elgin, 111. ; and St. Louis, Mo.: John F. Randolph was elected President ; and J. Y. Scammon, Secretary of the meet- ing. An address was delivered explanatory of the Doctrines of the Church, and the articles of Faith wore read, and steps were taken to secure the services of a New Chui'ch Minister. Rules of Order were adopted, a President, Secretary and Trea- surer ; and an Executive Committee for the ensuing year were elected; and additional circulars issued. It was also stated that New Church books were kept on sale at Mr. Gale's book store in Chicago. See N. J. Mag., for Sept., 1839. DR. BELDINQ IN BATTLE CREEK. la West, without my being able to see Dr. B., and as he did not expect to see rae there, of course he did not inquire for me, but passed on ; so I had na other alternative than to walk back again, and with no further expectation of seeing him. But on reaching home in the afternoon I was agreeably surprised to find ])r. Belding at my house awaiting my return ; and as he was obliged to resume hia journey the next day, we made a hanty arrange- ment for him to deliver a lecture at my house that evening, which ho did to about twenty persons The next morning he baptized my second son, (Henry,) and then resumed his journey to Canton, passing through Chicago without stopping there ; — an account of which is recorded in the New Church - man, vol. 1, page 418. Soon after this, whilst giving a lecture at the School House, introductory to a course on general scientific and literary subjects, I incidentally stated that something could not bo made out of nothing, — nor was the earth created out of nothing ; — at the end of my Lecture the Presbyterian Minister,. (who had but recently come to Battle Creek), a^ked my permission to offer a few remarks, which being granted, he arose and spoke for nearly half an hour, attempting to show that what I had said was infidelity in disguise, and subversive of sound re- ligious Doctrine, and warning the audience of the danger of listening to such teaching. "When he had concluded I stated to the audience that it was too late that evening to enter into a re- ply to what had been said, — but that at a very 14 DISCUSSION IN BATTLE CREEK. 1 early day I would deliver a lecture specifically upon that subject, with a view to show the injustice of this censure. Many of the most respectable and intellij:;ont people in the village were present at my Lecture, and they were exceedingly displeased with what they regarded as the captious opposition of an almost entire stranger, as this Minister was, and next day the subject was very generally can- vassed in the village ; — the result of which was that a special committee of the members of the Lyceum called on me to know if I would bo willing to discuss this subject in their meeting, to which I readily consented ; they then called on the Presby- terian Minister with the same request, to which he also assented, and eventually the question for de- bate was put into the following form: — "Do the first chapters of Genesis treat of the creation of the physical earth?" My opponent taking the affir- mative, and I the negative. The evening was ap- pointed and the arrangements duly made, and the house was full of people, but my opponent was not there ! I was therefore requested by the chair- man to say something to the people ; so I made a few remarks to them about the Garden of Eden; and an appointment was made for another evening, and a special committee appointed to wait on this minister, and see that he attended ; so they called on him next day and notified him of what had been done ; but he said he could not attend as he had an appointment to preach on the evening after, and must leave on the day appointed for the dis- cussion, so as to be there in time, as he would ON THE FIRST CnAPTER OF GENESIS. 16 have to walk ; they then promised to drive him •over in a bugf^y, without expense to him, and in good time, if he wouhl fuHil liis previous engage* ment with them ; but ho positively declined, and 80, after further deliberation, and with my consent, they secured the services of two Methodist Minis- ters, a Doctor, a Judge, and two Justices of the Peace ! — the strongest force to be obtained in that part of the country, who were unitedly to maintain the affirmative position. And the question was discussed for six evenings ! when, in accordance •with the rules of the Lyceum, a vote was taken (by rising) on the weight of argument, when not more than six or seven rose in support of the affir- mative, and two or three of those were the speak- ers on that side ! whilst nearly the whole audience rose to sustain the negative. One of the ministers admitting that they had been pretty well " used up." Still had tlui vote been on the mcnts of the question, it is not likely that this would have been their decision. In consequence of the interest excited by this dis- cussion, I was induced, subsequently, to devote my attention more especially to this subject ; which led to my preparing a course of lectures on the Creation of the Universe, and the Deluge, in the light of Revelation and Science. Perhaps it was the circumstance of Dr. Beld- ing's visit that awakened the desire to ascertain if there were any persons residing in the western part of the State who were receivers of the doc- trines of the New Church. It was on the 28th 16 KALAMAZOO AND CONSTANTINE. day of September, 1841, that Dr. Belding came to" Battle Creek: and shortly after that time I sus- pended my Bchool, and made arrangements for a tour of exploration and investigation, by stopping at every village I came to, and either lecturing or teaching by giving lessons in writing or steno- graph}^; that thus I might have an opportu- nity of making the enquiries I desired to. The- first place at which I stayed was Kalamazoo, 25 miles west of Battle Creek. Here I be- came acquainted with Mr. Thos. Atlee, son of Dr. E. Atlee, a well known N. C. man; though Mr T. A. was an Episcopalian. I also formed the acquaintance of Mr Dutton, principal teacher in the Branch University, who had, at one time, read a volume of Swedenborg's, although he did not understand it ; but desired to read more ; I was fortunatel}' able to let him have the very book he wanted, "Heaven and Hell." Mr Atlee also had a copy of De Charms' Sermons. I next went south, and stopped at Schoolcraft, where I saw a son of the late Mr. Copley, of Little Prairie Kondc, whose family belong to the New Church. I also saw and conversed with a Mrs. Church, who seemed to be a good deal interested in the doctrines. I next went to Constantine, where I delivered a lecture on the Inspiration of the Sacred Scriptures, at which Gov. Barry was present. Mr. B. expressed himself much pleased with the lecture, although not much of a believer in any religion ; but he had been very well acquainted with the Hon. C. P. Bush, member of the State Senate, then ELKHART AND EDWAUDSBUllG. 17 residing in Livingstone Co., and also with Condy Raguet, Esq., both well known New Churclimen. I also wrote a long letter to Gov. Barry, and sub- sequently had many conversations with him on these topics. On the 20th of December, I lound myself in Elkhart (Ind)., a few miles south of the Michigan boundary line ; where I remained two weeks. Here I delivered several lectures which were well attended ; mdeed the school-house was crowded, and the subject of the lectures the con- stant topic of discussion ; one of the storekeeper's sending for some of the N. C. books to keep oa sale. Having hoard that there was a Mr. Silver, whose name I have referred to above, living at Edwardsburg, (10 miles north of Elkhart), who, though an Episcopalian, was much interested in the writings of Swedenborg, I had intended to pass through that village on my way ; but had been diverted from it ; s:), whilst at Elkhart, I wrote a few lines to Mr. Silver, better known as *' Judge Silver," informing him of my being tliere, as also of my object, and regretting that I should not be able to call upon him. He immediately came over to see me, and invited me to his house, and promised to come for me as soon as I should be at liberty. This he did on New Year's day, 1842, and I stayed with him about two weeks, dur- ing which time I delivered a number of lectures ; some at the school house, and some at the Baptist Church. Mr. S. then returned with me to Elkhart, where I soon found there was more work for me to do. Rev. Mr. Cooke, (of Goshen, Ind.) being then re^wxiBjpr 18 DISCUSSION IN ELKHART. in Elkliart, (10 miles distant) having heard of the sensation produced by my lectures, made a direct attack on the teachings of Swedenborg, at a meet- ing of the Lyceum (Jan. 14th). I was then deli- vering a course of lectures in Elkhart on the Creation, Garden of Eden, Flood, &c., &c., and a. Mr. Babcock, a preacher among the " Christian Brethren," sent me a challenge to discuss with him the following question, "Do the Scriptures teach, (according to King James' translation), that Christ died for the people '?" I objected to the wording of this question, as it really left nothing to disci.ss ; as he could easily bring plenty of pas- sages to aftirm his position, as far as the mere words go ; but without any regard to their mean- ing. I therefore objected to the phraseology ; and desired it to be so put as to involve the meaning of the words ; but he would allow of no change ; and so, knowing that if I declined, he would at once proclaim that he had silenced me with a word. I thereff)re concluded to accept it, and make the best ex})lanation I could. 8o a time was set, and three Moderators clioson to decide upon the weight of argument. The house was crow^ded long before the time unpointed to commence, and crowds were around outside, at the door and windows. It was with ditticulty I could reach the stand. My op- ponent confined himself almost exclusively to quot- ing those i)assages from the Epistles, which aihrm thatChrist died for us ; whilst I endeavoured to show the meaning of His dying; and that it was not vicarious, or as a punishment for our sin ; but as THOSE WHO WERE INTERESTED. 19 the :ect eet- leli- the id «' itiaii with bures , that 3 the thing [ pas- mere niean- ; and ling of and once kd. I tie best three Ight of I before Is were Lt was ^ly op- qiiot- aftirm lo show las not Ibut as the means by which the Lord opened up the way for man's salvation, by providing the means for cm' dehverance from evil. Of course I labored under great difficulties in this effort ; tbe ideas were all new, and entirely at variance with estab- lished opinions ; and the wording of the question was against me ; — but I believe that notwithstand- ing tbat, the sympathies of the audience were most- ly with me — and after a long debate, the Modera- tors unanimously decided that the weight of argu- ment was in my favor. One of the audience, in alluding to the manner in which my opponent confined himself to the literal expressions of the Scriptures, said he kept " paddling away in his canoo " all the time. When I was in Elkhart this time, a Mr. Thos. Harris, a lawyer from Goshen, called on me to know whether I would not take Goshen in my way ; he said that the people there had heard of mo, and wouLl like me to come. This was out of my intended course, but on further consideration I concluded to go there. On leaving Elkhart the following persons were very much and very favourably interestt.'d in our doctrines ; viz., Mr. Bearup, a school teacher. Dr. Beardsley and wife, Mr. Coinpton, Mrs. Beebee, Mr. Horace Cook, Mr. Philip Smith, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Lauder, Mr. Pease, Mr. llawlins and Mr. Simonton. And at Ewardsburg, Mr. and Mrs. Abiel Silver, Mr. and Mrs. Lee, Mr. Kellogg, and several others who were more or less inter- ested. «■■ 20 PKOPOSEI) DISCUSSION. I arrivtid at Goshen l»y privrjte conveyarce, (there were not even stages running then ; the mail being carried on horseback) ; on Saturday, Jan. 22, 1842 ; and quite unwell ; and I had not been at the hotel where I put up more than an hour, before 1 received the following note from Rev. N. Cooke, Presbyterian minister, who had so recently been at Elkhart. "It will give him pleasure," says Mr. C, "to controvert publicly Mr. Field's position relating to the Creation, — his position relating to the Deluge, — his assumption relating to the person, character and mission of Jesus Christ ; his views of Church history ; and last and least, Mr, Cooke will endea- vor to prove that Emanuel Swedenborg was a blasphemer — an insane person — or a knave, (if Swedenborg's works can be obtained)." This I had had no alternative but to accept, and I so responded. Mr. C, at once without any further preliminary, had his note to me, and mine in reply, published m the next paper that came out, and also stated that the discussion would take place in the Metho- dist Church, — the largest one in the village, the use of which had been readily granted, as it was supposed this modern Goliath would soon demolish such idle conceits as I might present. Three Moderators were duly appointed, and the discus- sion commenced on Tuesday morning, Feb. 1st, (1842), at nine o'clock, and also the whole of the next day ; closing on Wednesday evening at nine o'clock. There were present all the time from three to five hundred persons ; many coming from AVI'ni Ml!. COOK IN (4(»SIIEN. 21 ^nary, iialied itated :etho- the it was Lioliali Three liscus- 1st, .f the nine from from Elkhart and the adjoining country, on purpose to attend. At the conclusion of the debate, 1 pro- posed that a vote be taken on the weight of argu- ment ; or that the Moderators should decide it ; but Air. Cook objecting, it was not done. I think that Mr. C. was well satisfied that he had failed to maintain a single point wlii'^h he had undertaken, and he was also satisfied that the audience knew it ; and I think they felt that his air and manner were over-ruling and brow-beating. At the con- clusion of this discussion I publicly enquired of the Trustees of the Church, if I could have the use of it for a Lecture, the next Sunday evening ; knowing that it was not used at that time. Joeing thus called upon, they had no opi)ortuiiity to make up an excuse ; and though perhaps not very will- ingly, they told me I could liave it. 1 then gave notice that I would, on that evening, give a lecture on the claims and credibility of Swed«>nborg. The house was crowded, not less tlian <")00 being pre- sent. My lecture was three hours long ! yet scarcely a person moved from his seat till I had concluded. Not expecting to get the use of that church, or indeed any other one in that village, for any more lectures ; some of my friends, for I soon found I had quite a good many there, had provided the use of the Court house for me, in which to deliver more lectures. The Court house was not a desirable place, being cold and uncomfortable : but two great fires were made in it, and seats arranged as well as could be : and so T announced that on th'^ next < — T- 22 WHAT THE PAPERS SAID. Sunday evening I would deliver a lecture there, on the nature and character of the Spiritual world. The ^lethodists now began to be troubled ; their Chi'rch and congregation was much the largest in the village ; and though they were not in the habit of having Sunday evening meetings ; the Minister gave notice that they would have one that evening ; but I was informed there were not more than a dozen present ; whilst the Court house was crowd- ed. As an indication of the interest these subjects awakened I will quote the remarks made by the editors of each of the two weekly i)apers published in the village. The " Goshen Democrat," whose editor was a Presbyterian, after referring to the discussion and the subjects canvassed, says, " The debate was one of unusual interest, was numerous- ly attended, and the subject handled with ability." The " Northern Indianian," whose editor was a non-professor, says, — " Pursuant to the notice in our last number, the Eev. Messrs. Cook and Field met, at the Methodist chapel in this town, last Tuesday, for the purpose of discussing the subjects contained in the note of Mr. Cooke. The discus- sion was continued until nine o'clock last evening. The subjects of discussion were contained in the following i)roposition, viz : — 1st. The Book of Gene- sis does not treat of a physical, but a mental crea- tion. Mr. Field took the aftirmative of this (ques- tion. 2nd, The Bible does not treat of a physical, but a moral deluge. Afiirmative, Mr. Field. 3rd, That Jesus Christ was both God and man, and that He came into the world to offer Himself as a SUBJECTS DISCUSSKD. 23 a in s a vicarious or exi)iatory sacrifice for the sins of the people. Affirmative, Mr. Cooke. 4tli, That all the different denominations of Cliristians of the pre- sent day, are seceders from, and hranchos of, the Roman Catholic Church. Affirmative, Mr. Field. 6th, That Emanuel Swedenl)org was an insane person, or a blasphenn'r and a knave. Affirmative, Mr. Cooke. The discussion was one of great in- terest, and the ability displayed by the disputants was of no ordinary character. During most of the time the house was crowded, and the most anxious attention was given by the audience. E. G. Cham- berlin, (Recorder), Dr. E. W. H. Ellis and T. G. Harris, Esq., acted as Moderators ; and we take this occasion to remark that they fulfilled the deli- cate duties of the station in a manner creditable to themselves, and highly satisfactory to the audience. "We will not presume to give our opinion as to the weight of the arguments advanced on either side in support of the general propositions. Suffice it to say, that we consider it altogether immaterial to the scheme of salvation, whether the world was created in six days, or a thousand years ; or whether it was deluged with water or false- hood. The debate on the third proposition was the most lengthy and labored, Mr. Cooke contending that Jesus Christ was both God and man, and also that Christ and the Father were two persons. Mr. Field insisted that there was but one person in the Godhead, and that Jesus Christ was the Almighty and only God ; and that while He was on the earth, veiled in flesh. He was 24 HOW IT KNDKD. omniia'esGiit by virtue of the Divi'iity."" After noticing the 4th and 5th propositions, the Editor furtl'er says : — ** On the wliole, for one, "we were highly pleased with the discussion. The object of de})ate is to discover the truth ;Vand by comparing all systems, we are only able to discover the true wone. When we see a person who is averse to dis- / cussion, we are apt to conclude that he suspects / that his system is rotten, and is afraid that it will be found outV^ Jjut the more a Hubj(>ct is agitated the niore apparent will be the truth. ^Superstition and ignorance form the rubbish that conct-al it from the view. > " Truth, cruHlied to earth, will rise again, The cteiiial years of Cod are liers : — J^ ]3ut error, wounded, writhes in })ain, And dies amid lier worshippers." *^ After giving the two lectures already referred to ; by particular re(piest, 1 remained and delivered a series on the following subjects, viz, — The Language of Scripture, — the Divine Trinity, — Heaven and Hell, — and other subjects ; all being well attended, and attracting much attention. Those who ap- peared to be most interested were Mr. and Mrs. Rollin, Mr. Carr, Mr. T. Harris, Mr. Brown, Mr. Chamberlin, A. M. Haskell and brother, and about a dozen others. Soon after I left Goshen a com- munication appeared in the "Goshen Democrat," in opposition to some views which 1 had presented whilst there, on tlie OrUjin of Thouf/hts ; to which I sent a reply, which also was published, vindicat- ing my position, which was that Thoughts come to us from the spiritual world ; sometimes mediately, I DISCl'SSJON IN' THK NKWSPAPKRK. '25 and Hometimes immediately, which I oxplainod and illustrated. To this no reply was made ; hut the editor of tlie other [)apor. " 'I'lie Northern In- dianian." the next week, of his own accord, repub- lished the Address of the Central (Jouvention of the New Church, wliich had just appeared in the "New World." This brought out Mr. Cooke again in a long article, headed, " Speech for IJimkum," ii\ which he endeavored to weaken or destroy tlie influence it might have. This induced me to write again, to refute tlie false statements and sophistries that had been somewliat freely indulged in : and this corres- pondence was continued for several weeks, until Mr. C. became irritated, and rather wild in his re- marks, when the subject was dropped. One of the storekeepers said he should get some of the books and keep them for sale ; another proiaised to send for one of the New Church [x.'riodicals. I also, soon afterwards, received a letter trom Elk- hart, from a gentleman, who had just returned from a visit to Goshen; in which Ik^ says, " Mr. H. Piollin is much pleased with the new way of reading the Scriptures, and also tht; writings of Swedenborg, so far ; he wishes you to com- there as soon as you can, and bring some small books. He says that there is quite a stir in Goshen, and many quite inclined to fall in with the doctrine." Judge Blackman, who lives about 2Q miles S. of Goshen, is a very warm receiver of the Doctrines, and lent some of the Arcana to people in the vil- lage, after my visit there. After leaving Goshen 2G AT MIRHAWAUKA. I had to pass throiij,'!! Elkhart at,'ain, when I de- livered a lecture on the nature and character of Heaven and Hell, to a full house ; and from thence went on to Mishawauka, (Ind.), where I arrived, Feh. i)th. This village is 12 miles W. of Elkhart, and does an extensive business in the manufacture of iron. I at once applied for permission to use the Pres- byterian Church to deliver some lectures in, which, however, was refused me. Mr. Cooke, of Goshen, having written to one of his friends there about me, in advance of my coming, telling them how dangerous, and yet alluring the doctrines were, that I should advance — or to use his. own language, that I should prepare the jjill and gild it over so attractively, that they would all swallow it. I then applied for the use of the Methodist Church ; but the alarm had spread, and so that also was refused me. It was much more Qustomary in the earlier set- tlement of the country, when churches were very few, and generally built by public contributions, to allow them to be used by other religious deno- minations, than it has become since. Failing in my efforts to obtain a Church, I readily succeeded in obtaining the school house ; although not near- ly so desirable a place, I gave several lectures on the Trinity, Atonement, Language of Scriptures, &c., which were so well attended as to induce the Methodist Minister, on the Sunday evening, to preach against what he supposed to be the New Church doctrines ; and ridiculed the idea of fire F(JOLIBH UEl'ORTS. 27 denoting; love. There must be a f^ood dral of Lor^ said lie, in Hell-lire ! But it wan tliou^dit to ))e a more effectual way to silence my effortH, by pub- liHbinp; in the " Tocsin," a weekly paper owned and edited by Mr. Storey, — now the editor and i)ro- prietor of the " Chicago Times," — that I was the absconding cashier of a Wildcat ]3ank wliich had failed at Battle Creek some time before. I then learned for the first time that there had been such a bank at Battle Creek, and that its cashier was named Field ; but this bank had ceased to exist a long time before I ever saw Battle Creek. I sent a communication to that effect to Mr. Storey, who promised to j^ublish it ; but I do not know whether he did or not. After remaining at ^lishawauka nearly two weeks, I went to South Bend, about 12 miles west, even then quite an important place ; but I did not attempt to deliver any lectures there, as there were two protracted meetings then going on ; so, after remaining there a few days, I went to Niles, (Mich.), about ten miles N., where I was kindly permitted to use the Methodist Church to deliver two lectures in ; at the first lecture there were about 500 present, and at the second even more, the house being quite crowded. The subject of this lecture was the language of the Sacred Scriptures. Dr. E. Atlee, 1 was told, had preached there once, some two or three vears before. At this place I had the pleasure of l)econiing acquaint- ed with Mr. and Mrs. Ward, receivers of the N. C. Doctrines. (Mrs. W. was a sister of ]\Ir A. B. Copley, of Little Prairie lionde, near Schoolcraft), / •28 NIIiKS AND I, A PORrK. who Were then living in Niles. A Mr. KoundB, a Free-will 13apti8t, also hecame very much interest- ed in the doctrines ; and a ^h. Goodman, a book- seller livinj^ in the village, although very sceptical on religions subjects, and who never went to church, attended my lectures at the Methodist (Jhurch, as also others which I gave at the school house, with great regularity, and talked with me a good deal about them. After remaining in Niles over two weci^s, 1 again started West, and my next Btop]>ing [dace was La I'orte, Indiana, where 1 ar- rived March 14th, 184*2. At this ])lace I gave two public lectures at the ('ourt House; one on the Trinity, and the other on the Atonement ; the at- tendance here was not very large, but I had the pleasure of forming the acquaintance of JIarvey Strong, Ks(|., visiting at his house and taking tea with his family. It was on one of tliese occasions, whilst we were conversing on religious suojects, (Mr. Strong's family were IJiiptists^, that some one asked me what church I belonged to; O, 1 said, if 1 told you, you would not understand it any bet- ter ; but they insisted on my telling ; so I said, the New Jerusalem Church. I at once saAv curious and significant glances pass from one to the other, and all seemed to be no little astonished : this led me to enquire its meaning, when I was informed tliat one of the daughters, a short time previous, had had a very singular dream ; she dreamed that the judgment day had come and all the people had to be judged in the churches to which they belonged, and that they were all gathered together under YOUNCi LADY H DKEAM. 29 their roflpective leaders, and the members of each clmrcli had to cross a wide river hy passing over a bridge ; and tliat the Catholics first commenced crossing; hut before they got over, tlie bridge gave wav, and let them all fall into the river below ! But on looking up again, she saw that the bridge was repaired ; and the Kpiseopalians wore about to cross it ; and whilst yet wondering whether it was made strong enough, she saw it give way as before, and all the thousands who stood u^jon it went down into the river and were drowned. Affrighted at this catastrophe, and looking to see how much daiiage was done, she saw the bridge restored, and tht Presbyterians about to cross over it, and whilst stili ; azing at the multitudes as they passed, the bridj^. .igain divided asunder and pre- cipitated them into the stream below ! So in like manner the Congregationalists, Universalists, and Unitarians, all met a similar fate. Next came the turn of the Baptists; and oh, she said, how I did pray that the bridge might be strong enough to bear them safely across, and how eagerly I watched their progress ; but alas ! it was of no use, lor they all went down, just the same as the others. Then next she heard called the "New Jerusalem Church," to pass over ; but as the Baptists had all gone down, and as she knew nothing of the New Jeru- salem Church, never having even heard the name before, she felt entirely indifferent about them ; yet she thought, as she had seen all the others go down, she would see them go down too. So she carelessly saw them pass along ; they reached the "^r 80 MICHIGAN CITY. middle and the end, find all passed safely over, and the bridge did not break ! Then she awoke. It was the remembrance of this dream, that caused so much surprise, when I told them I belonged to the New Jerusalem Church. This also induced them to make further inquiries in regard to the doctrines of that Church. Mr. Strong said he would send for a copy of the True Christian Reli- gion ; which 1 afterwards understood he did. Whilst in La Porte, I attended a series of lectures on Medical Jurisprudence, Inflammation, Obstet- rics, and Astronomy ; as also a lecture by Prof. Morse on Volcanoes ; and formed an acquaintance with some of the Professors. After leaving La Porte, I went to Michigan City, the only outlet on Lake Michigan to the State of Indiana. I was not very favourably impressed with the appearance of this almost deserted village ; built on a sand bank, and of a very forlorn aspect ; but I delivered several lectures there. I had the use of the Methodist Church when it was not otherwise occupied ; it was the only church building in the place — the Presbyterian church iiad been burned down some time previous, and they were then using an un- occupied store. i applied for the use of this ; when the Methodist church was occui)ied ; which the trustees of the church property were not willing to grant me ; so I applied to the owner of the store, who let the Presbyterians have it gratuitous- ly, and he was perfectly willing that I should have it ; so the trustees reconsidered their previous re- fusal and rescinded it, although not very gracious- HOMEWARD BOUND. 81 ly. I delivered a lecture on the Atonement in this building, which some of the Presbyterians attend- ed ; one of them expressed his wonder that the roof did not fall down upon them, as a judgment upon them for being there ! On the k:?unday I obtained the use of the school-house to lecture in ; but when I went there in the morning for tliat purpose, I found the door locked, and the key could not be found ! But those who were waiting outside, not wishing to be disappointed, invented a very simple kind of key with which they opened the door for me ! Two gentleman in Michigan City, (Universalists), were much interested in my lectures ; and said they did not know when they had been so much gratified l)efore ; tliey invited me to take dinner and tea with them, and expressed a wish to hear me again ; they said they would pur- chase " The Plenary Inspiration of the Scriptures," and the work on " Heaven and Hell. ' 1 now turn- ed my face homeward again, but in doing so, by especial and earnest request, I again made a visit of a few days at Edwardsburg with Mr. Silver ; wliere I delivered two lectures, one at the liaptist church, and the other at the school-house. 1 also went with him to see a Mrs. Wealthy Evans, an elderly lady, then l)etween GO and 70 years of nge, and who had been nearly all her life in the Epis- copal church ; she lived about eight miles south ol Edwardsburg, near the state line. For some time past she had been reading New Chuxch books with much interest, and had become quite in earnest on the subject ; she was especially pleased with the mmmi w' W^ < WiT ' " 82 now 1 MUCCEIiDED. Bcience of Correspoiulence. She also was prepar- ing a letter to send to her Episcopal minister in- forming him of her ciiange of views, and consider- ing how she could form a N. C. Sabbath School. And Mr. and Mrs. Silver were no less earnest and indefatigable in their elforfcs to make known to all who had ears to hear, the beautiful truths and glad tidings of great joy, which are now made known to the world in the heavenly doctrines of the New Jerusalem. On leaving the abode of ray kind en- tertainers at Edwardsburg, which I did in their company, riding with them in their carriage about sixty miles of my homeward journey, I turned my face again toward Battle Creek, where I arrived in April, 1842. During the six months I was absent I paid my own way, by giving lectures on other sulijects occasionally; by teaching penmanship, stenography, &c., and taking up collections; so that I was not only able to pay my travelling ex- penses and hotel bills, but to send money home to my wife from time to time, for all necessary uses. I again recommenced school-teaching for the sum- mer ; but as there were now a number of persons in Battle Creek, who were receivers of, or more or less interested in the N. C. doctrines, we held meet- ings for worship at my school-room on the Sabbath mornings. Amongst those most interested at this time were Mr. and Mrs. E. Astley, Mr. and Mrs. J. Bailey, Mr. and Mrs. W. G. Wheaton, Miss Annie Parker, and Mr. L. H. Stewart. Occasion- ally I would lecture at Marshall, Verona, Baton Centre, &c. AGAIN LEFT HOME. 33 or on During this summer (1842), a correspondence was commenced among the more active friends of the Church, inchiding Mr. R. II. Murray, E. D. Fisher, and A. Silver, with a view to inaugurate the establishment of a New Church Association, to include Michigan and Northern Indiana ; which subsequently culminated in a called meeting for that purpose during the next winter, of which, in due time. I have already stated that it was during this summer that the little society in Detroit be- came dispersed, till not one was left of it ! In tlio autumn of this year I again made preparation for another missionary tour, intondhig this time to penetrate into Illinois ; so on the 2()th of Septem- ber, (18-12,) I again turned my face westward tak- ing the stage for Kalamazoo, then private convey- ance southerly to White Pigeon, from which place I went direct to Edwardsburg by wagon, where 1 arrived at our friend Silver's on Saturday after- noon, and next day delivered a discourse there to a small audience ; and on Tuesday morning, Oct. 1th, left Edwardsburg in company wifli Mr. Silver, lor Goshen. On the way called on and saw Mr. and Mrs. Smith, of Cleveland, Elkhart Co., found them deeply interested in the doctrines of the Church ; and had formed, in connection with Mrs. Evans, (before referred to), a Sabbath School of 30 scholars ! Mr. Smith was also intending to read a sermon in public every Sunday ; he wished me to remain awhile there and deliver a few lectures ; but I could not do so then. We made a short stay in Elkliiirt, and proceeded at once to c 84 RECEIVERS IN GOSHEN. Goshen, wliere we arrived in time for me to deliver a lecture there the same evening at the school- house, which was full. I now stayed with Mr. and Mrs. Rollin, who had become full receivers of the doctrines, and warmly attached to them. I might mention here that I left with the editor of the *' Northern Indianian," the copy of a letter ad- dressed by Mrs. W. Evans, to her late Hector, the liev. Mr. Price, giving her reasons for withdrawing from the Episcopal church, which was duly pub- lished. I delivered two discourses from the words : " What think ye of Christ ? Whose Son is He ?" and one each on Jehovah our Saviour — Tlie second coming of the Lord — The liesurrection — Tlie Last Judgment; and then a course of six others, on the Creation, Garden of Eden, Flood, &c., concluding on Friday evening, Oct. 14. There were now quite a considerable number of persons in Goshen who professed their faith in the doctrines of the New Church, among whom were, Mr. and Mrs. Bollin, Mr and Mrs. Ball, and daughter, Mr. and Mrs. Clarke, Mr. Heglin, Mr. Hucli, Mr. Julian, Mr. and Mrs. Cooke, and Miss Williams, Mr. Elbridge Chamberlin, Mr. Abner Blue, Mr. and Mrs. Carr, Mr. C. Haskell, and A. N. Haskell, Mr. Ebenezer Chamberlin, (Circuit Judge,) Mr. and Mrs. Dun- bar, Mr. T. G. Harris, Mr. John Blue, Mr. Basor, Mr. A. Stillson, Mr. S. Brown, Mr. Jackson, Mrs. Winder, her husband and daughter being both very favorable; and the average attendance at the lectures on week days were about <S(), and on Sun- day about 150. Every effort was made that could MODE OF OPPOSITION. 85 who New ;ollin, Mrs. Mr. •idge Carr, nozer )iin- iiisor, Mrs. 1 very the Sun- could ])e made, to keep the members of the other clmrches from attending the lectures ; a prayer- meeting was commenced and continued during my stay there, i.i the Methodist church : and prayers offered up for the especial benefit of those who were being deluded by false and deceptive teaching ; which prayers were aided in their efficacy by sta- tioning zealous members of the church in the way, to intercept and turn back any of the flock that might be straying to the lectures ! Whilst I was in Goshen this time, Mr. Rollin received about a dozen volumes of New Church books which lie had sent for, (among which were three vols, of the Arcana,) all of which were in great demand for reading. Several articles also appeared in the " Northern Indianian, ' written by Mr. A. Silver, Mrs. Evans, and mys(;lf in favor of the New Church. Thus notwithstanding the op- position, the prospects seemed every way favorable for the establishment of a New Church Society there, as large, or even larger, than any of the Old Church. On Saturday evening, Oct. 15th, I left Goshen in company with Mr. Jas. Blue, with a kindly expressed wisli for my speedy return, and went to Elkhart again, and was cordially invited to stay there at Dr. and Mrs. Beardsley's. I de- livered two lectures there on the day after my arrival (Sunday), and afterwards six others, on the following subjects, viz : The coming of the Lord - - Hell — Second Coming — Resurrection — Last Judgment — Miracles of Egypt, and meaning of the Son of Man. The attendance was good at every mm^imm 86 KLKITART AND YANKKETOWN. lecture, many expressing tliemselves deeply inter- ested in the subjects advanced ; cspeciaDv Dr. and Mrs. Beardsley, besides whom I now found Mr. and Mrs. Lander, Dr. Weyner, Mr. and Mrs. Bear- up, Mr. H. Cook, Mrs. Beebee, Mr. Kellaman, Mr. Philip Smith, and Squire Heaton and wife, who lived five miles from Elkhart. The avera^^e atten- dance during the week days was about GO. Elk- hart at this time was but a small place ; not a church building had as yet been erected there, the school-house being the only church ! I left Elk- hart on Saturday evening (after my lecture), Oct. 22nd, in company with Mr. Walters, and went to Yankee Town, 4 miles distant ; staying with Mr. Walter's and ^Ii*. Smith ; and on the following day (Sunday), I delivered two lectures at Mr. Smith's house, on the Trinity, and Redt-mption to about 10 persons. This place is also the residence of Mrs. Evans, before mentioned, where the Sal)- batli school was commenced ; they wert; then waiting to get suitable books. From this little settlement 1 went to Edwardsburgh again, (8 miles distant) ; and next morning, in company with Mr. Silver, rode over to Niles, where I remained two weeks and delivered l-J lectures, part of them at the Methodist Church, and the others at the school house. These lectures were on the Creation of the Universe, Flood, &c., and also on the Divine Trin- ity as centred in the person of the Lord Jet us Christ, Human Redemption, the Second Comhig of the Lord, the IJesurrection, and Last Judgment. Those who were most interested in Niles at this LECTUUES IN NILES. 87 time, were IMr. and ^[is. Warrl, Jonathan Brown, Esq., "Nfr. Forres. "Mr. Jacob Brown, Mr. Bounds, Elder Fellowes Mrs. Perkins, Mr. MeWilliains, T^fiss Huston, and Miss Folwell, ]\[r. I^arrow, and Mr. Williams. During mv stay in Niles T boarded with Mr. and ]\[rs. Perkins. It was whilst I was here that it was decided to ca-1 a meeting of the Beceivers of tlu; Doctrines of the New Church to be held at Albion, on tlie 2nd day of January, 18 JB, for the i)urpose of forming and organizing an Association to embrace Michi- gan and Northern Indiana. On tlu^ Sth of Nov. 1 left Nil(>s for St. Joseph (on Lake Michigan\ where I delivered six lectures on the Creation and Deluge, and on the Sal)bath. two Icctur^^s, on t\w Doctrines of the Lord and Bedcmption, and after- wards on the Divine Attributes. Tlies" lecture ^ were well attended, and attracted nnicli attention, many persons becoming very much interested. I jiiigliL especially mention J. X. Bogers, Esq., who seemed to be awakened from the depth of scej!- ticism into an entirely new life. T was commis- sioned to purchase for him ii^id others, such books as I might think most useful for tiiem to read, and they soon obtained the True Christian Beligion, the Four Leading Doctrines, lltaven and [[(dl, Nobhi's Ai)peal, a;id Plenary liHpiration. ! might also give the names of some others wlu) were much interested, viz., ^Ir. .losiah Piogers, Thompson, Hoyt, Sutherland, ^Ir. Plum, and Dr. and Mrs. Wheeler. With these latter I was kindlv invit(d to spend the last three or four days of my visit to St. Joseph. / 38 ST. JOSEPH AND CHICAGO. On Monday evening, Nov. 21st, after waiting two or three days for a violent gale to subside, I left St. Joseph in the last boat crossing the lake that sea- son, for Chicago, distant about 60 miles, which we were nearly fifteen hours and a half in veaching. I went to the City Hotel, where I remained two or three days and made arrangements for delivering my Course of lectures on the Creation and Flood ; and on Wednesday evening, Nov. 23rd, gave my first, or introductory lecture. It was a very stormy night, and not more that 70 or 80 persons were present. At the second lecture, which was on Thanksgiving evening, there was a good atten- dance ; all the other lectures were well attended. The hall, which was in the saloon l)uilding, was conveniently situated, and would hold !il)i)ut 400 persons, and was generally well filled, especially so on Sunday evening. After I had concluded the above course, I, by particular request, delivered another course of five lectures on the doctrines of the New Church, at the same place, whicli also were well attended. Soon after my arrival in Chicago I called upon Mr. J. Y. Scammon, who was almost as well known in Chicago then, as he is now ; who gave me a cor- dial invitation to make his house my home whilst in Chicago, which I was much pleased to accept ; he also, preferring that the lectures should be free, volunteered to pay all the expenses connected with their delivery, and pay me for my services in giv- ing them, to which I consented, and I think, or at least hope, we were mutually satisfied. Chicago HOW A LOT WAS OBTAINED. 89 at this time did not contain more than about 8,000 inhabitants ; but even then it was very hopeful of great things. It was true there was no railroad there, nor even a canal, although one had been commenced to connect Lake Michigan, at Chicago, with La Salle, on the Illinois river, but it was a question between fear and hope whether it would €ver be completed. The Canal Commissioners at this time were giv- ing building lots to such religious societies in Chi- cago as needed them, to erect churches upon ; and Mr. Scammon, willing to take time by the forelock, thought the opportunity ought not to be overlook- ed ; so with his usual zeal in the cause of the New Church, he called a meeting at his house for the purpose of organizing a New Church Society, and applying in an orderly way for one of these lots ; not having any doubt but that " in the course of human events " it wonhl be wanted, to erect a New Church Temjiiie upon. So a meeting of the mem- bers of tlie church was held accordingly, and it consisted of Mr. .1. Y. Scammon, Mrs. Scammon, and a Mr. Lovell. Mr. S. was duly elected Presi- dent, and Mr. Lovell Secretary ; and resolutions were drawn up in due form, unanimously adopted, asking for one of said lots ; which, on being pre- sented to said Commissioners, was duly honored, and a lot was granted and deeded to this embry- otic society. This lot was then away off on the commons, on the outskirts of the city ; i)ut which, in the course of time, was found to })e situated on Adams street, between the two most fashionable 40 NOTICK FN *' WKSTKIIN (^FTIZKN." avenuos in tlie city, and on what is destined to be an important business stroct. Wliilst I was de- livorinf; the ahovo course of lectures at Chicago, Kev. J. B Hibbard who was then living on a farm in Lucas Co., Ohio, was on his way to Canton, Illinois, where ho was going on a visit to the Society, then recently instituted there by Dr. Beld- ing, ot which I have i)ofore spoken. j\[r. Hibl)ard was on horseback, and his horse died whilst on the way, before reaching Chicago. A favorable and friendly notice of these lectures app. Jired in the "Western Citizen," n jiapcr rb(>ii published in Chicago, in which, iilLer soni',- personal remarks concerning ine, the writei* says: — " Jjast winter he lectured in Goshen and Klkhart, Tnrliana, and his lectures were attended by large audiences, and with absorbing interest." Then, after referring to the more recent lectures given in Goshen, I'^lkhart, Niles, and St. Joseph, says, " j\lr. Field belongs to a class of jn'ofessed Christians who believe that tilt second coming of the Lord, foretold in the New Testament, is not a literal coming, or a coming in person, but a coming in spirit, by revealing the in- ternal or spiritual sense of the Word of God. Ac- cordingly he and they believe that the Bible throughout, has an internal or spiritual sense, so that every word has a meaning within the letter, and distinct from it,'' and that " the Mosaic ac- count of the Creation and the Deluge cannot be literallv true and was never intended to be so understood, that it vas written in a symbolical age, when natural images and language were used liECTUREH IN JOLIET. 41 to express spiritiuil things, and that the J^ook of Genesis, instead of troatinp; of a literal creation and dostniction of the world, treats of the regener- ation of man, thus showing that tlic investigations of geology, whieh aro sup])03ed to contrndict the Mosaic act.'ount of the creation, may be true, witli- out detracting from the authority of Scripture." After 8i)onding two weeks quite pleasantly at Chi- cago, I again resumed my journey, and en the evening of the day on which I left, (Dec. Oth,) I found myself at Joliet, about 40 miles distant, where I deliver(Ml foui- lectures, which, thougli not numerously attended, L had amongst my hearers the Episcopal and Universjilist Ministers, Judge Peck, Squire Ilawley, nnd other people of note. On Saturday evening, (Dec. 10th,) I left Joliet for Ottawa, where I arrived the followiiig morning at half past thre?, and [)ut up nt the Mansion House. At tliis place i gave a Course of Ten Lectures at the Court flouse. These Lectures were on the Creation and J)cduge ; th- Miracles of Egypt; and the life alter death. The Court House was full every evening, and the Lectures listened to with profound attention: and were the constant topics of conversation. x\mongst those who seem- ed to be the most interested were Mr. Hise, editor of the Free Tiadcr, Messrs. Ueddiek, Cott(m, True, Ware, Stone, Thompson, Dickey, Champlin, l\[on- roe, Dr. Hurlbut, kc. The Free Tnuler of the next week had an editorial on the subject of the Lectures, in which they are thus spoken of, under the head of " Mr. Field's Lectures. The atten- 42 ^"ADERi, COMMENTS. House „„tl,e«oer„::'!'""''-r' ''' "- Court Jen.salo,„ Church •• h f , "'"'"*"'I^e» "'o ' New lecturer, eanie amon» us „ l- ^^'- *'^'''. 'he "«. in proportion to ti e .7 r '" "™"«''''- ''"J lectures, the anviety L! !T """'"' ^^ *''« e<l to know somSn" '" ''■"'•' l'*'*'" in^'-eas- An extract is tZ^'il'"'" ''"<"" '"e leoturer.- i" relerenee to m^" " ^^ '™V''" "'^^"■'■« «"««. <"■'- wlu-eh the c'/itore' «^ "/^-'•^""'-edents, purpose to mve nnv . A •"" ^^ ^^ ^ot our "-0 lectur::" SCL^ '""'^^'' ^"^'"'^ "' ^oom to ,Io it, even s on, ' ""■ '™"''' "»' have '•-1 cou>pete„'t, m" et frll' """ '"' ^ "" «<" ^f our reader,, who IM .^ "'"■^' '" *''™ "'ose After making another „lt f , "" ''°' '"n'^-" «"-«. .leseript V o he r """ "'^ "'■>'-■« concludes l.is emarh tt 'T'' ."'^ '""'"^ ""'« ami •i»as.s,Mniu<Mn.,,n ■ , , , '* " ^'"•^ ""odest •noreensasin, :,";"/: ^'"''-"^ "^^^'^^ heard a to the ei:,cMari:rc^^^t ;";:."- ^^"« -"'■' ''-S scientific knowledge or ",",^^'' \Sreatev hind of 'eft a deep i,npres°o'n L Z'l ' ""'^- '^^' ''- -11 induce a search fo;i,Sr"j ''"^'.''''' " one of immense interest n„„ ^^ ™''J'"=' thorough investigation itUn weU w„,,,,y „, ^ o 'on. it will not do to treat with t ARiaVAL AT PKORIA. 43 indifference or contempt, doctrines which hear with them such a fair show of reason, and which come ostensihly hacked hy what are at k^ast conceived to he the discoveries of geolo :ists : hut, if met at all, they must he met l)y reason and argument." On Wednesday evening Dec. 21 st, f loft Ottawa for Teoria : the weather was very cold, and tlie stages very comfortless. I arrived at Peoria the next evening, and put up with ^Ir. King, at the Clinton House. Mr. E. N. Powell, hrother of Rev. David Powell, w^as the only New Churchman living there, and he was al)Si3nt at the time, in Springfield, where the Lui'islature was in session.* * Tu a coiiimiiiiiciitioii to tlm H'i'stfni ''miri'iit inn, which met 11 Ciiiciiiiiiiti ill 1SJ;{. Mr. K. N. Powell, of I'eoria, says; "Dr. BeUliiig preacliecl the first New Church serinou in Peoria, in the Fall of 1H41 (when on his way to Canton). Ho liad to preach under the most unfavorahle circumstanceH, and liis •conf^ret^atioii was small."" He delivered two discourses. Aud ahout a year afterwards, Mr. Powell says, " Mr.Prescott visited Pooria and prea'ilifd for us three times." Then he (^ives an account of my visit in January. 1813, and adds; "And T am liappy to s:iy that the spark which had heen ij^nited hy Dr. Beldiiif^, and made to hurn hy Mr. Prescott, was fanned into a flame hy Mr, Field."' •' .Mr. Field's power of reason, aud the force ill whi;h he jtrt'seiiti'd tlie truths of the New Church was such, that it almost silemed opposition." " His lectures were attended hy the most iiitellii,'ent and virtuous of our citizens; iuid he has made an impression in favor of the truths of the N w Church, which I trust will never he effaced." "Upon airivinti home, (he says): I found that a niitjhty revolution had taken place in the minds of many, in re^jard to the True object of reUf{ious worship, and of love to God, and our neighbor ;" and "a deep toned desire— to know the tmi' way of interpreting the Sacred Scriptures:" Ac, iVc. 44 '^ now I GOT TflE COURT HOUSK. The next day I sought tlio shcrilT to ohtain tlie use of the Court house for my lectures ; l)ut it was a long time hefore I conkl find him ; and wlien I did he as positively as politely informed me tliat I could not have it ! I remonstrated and hosought in vain ; he said the hall had heen so abused by being used by every one who catne along, that they had concluded not to grant the us(! of it any more for any other than City or Council purposes. But as this did not at all comport with the purpose for which T had come to Peoria, I thought T would not take "No," for nn answer: so I continued to be- siege him in the most agreeable! way T could; mentally resolved not to leave him till he had con- sented. So presently 1 took out a posting bill, which 1 Jiad with me, ;)nd filled out the blanks to the effect that I should deliver the first Lecture of the Course at the Court House in Peoria, on Mon- day evening, Dec. 'J(')th. I showed this to the Sheriff, who said notjiiu';: 1 then went to th(? out- side door, and tncked it ui)on it! Wliilst I was doing so, he came out, and apologized to me for for being so hard-hearted, and said T could have the room for that one lecture, but for no more ; so that much was gained. The next day 1 had my advertisements circulated about town, which creat- ed some talk : the prevailing opinion however was that it was a humbug. Still the lecture was well attended, and attentively listened to, and seemed to make a favorable impression. At its close I stated to the audience what I proposed doing, and suggested the way I wished it to be done. I said t AliPAN(ii;MENT FOR LKCTUUKS. 45 that it" tlioy would like vO hear the Course of Lee- tures, (tliey were on the Creation, &c.,) that I would deliver theui on these conditions, viz : they must furnish me with a suitable room or hall for that purpose, and warm and light it ; I told them the difliculty I had had with the sheritT in regard to obtaining the Court House for that evening, and that he would not let me have it again. That they must advertise the Lectures, appoint a door-keeper, and take up a collection every evening ; and that if they collected enough to satisfy me, I would go on with them, if not, I should stop ; or if they were dissatislied, they weri; to let me know. And I said, with a view to ascertain whether this method will suit you, I propose that you nominate a chairman, and take the sense of the meeting ; and, if approved of, that he aiipoint a committee of six persons to make the necessary arrangements. This was at once agreed to, and Dr. Dickinson, (Unitarian,) was called upon to take the chair, which he did ; and the plan which I suggested was at once adopted. There was now no dilliculty in obtaining the use of the Court House, and suitable persons were ai)pointed to warm and light it, and ring the l)ell, and take up the collections. The Lectures were well attended, and for the first two or three evenings the amount collected was quite satisfactory, alter that they fell olf ; so the connnittee announced that no person should be allowed to come in who did not give something; and as there was no currency then smaller than live cents, they iiuisfc pay at least so much. The t 46 WHAT THE PEORIA REGISTER SAID. first evening after this, many who came without any money, had to go away, or go and get some ; some returned, and some did not ; but after that they all brought something, and the collections were again satisfactory, and the attendance large and respectable. After finishing the Course on the Creation, &c., I was urgently requested to deliver some on the peculiar theological views of the New Church, which I did, giving in all eleven lectures. The editor of the Peoria Recjister, who was a deacon in the Presbyterian church, in his paper of Dec. 80th, thus notices my lectures. "Mr. Field a lecturer of some celebrity at the Nortli, com- menced a course here on Monday night which has been received with great acceptance. His subject is The Creation — a boundless field. We have not been able to be present, but learn from those who have, that they have been highly entertained, and on some points instructed. ' On Wednesday even- ing,' says a correspondent, 'the manner in which the sun, earth and other planets were produced was the subject. The positions taken b}- him are at least novel, and however our fancy may have been pleased, our judgment is not yet convinced. Tliis evening the proper signification of the first chapter of Genesis is announced to be given, and a rich treat is expected." Mr. F. is a believer in tiie theological doctrines of Swedenborg, though whether his scientific views are derived from him, or whether they are his own, we know not." In tlie next issue of the same paper, (Jan. 6th, 1843) the editor thus comments ; — " Mr. Field's Lec- f I FURTHER COMMENTS. 47 f TURES. Mr. Field closed his course of Lectures, on the Creation, Deluge, and the Doctrines of the * New Church ' last night, drawing crowded audi- ences. We were able to be present at one only — the first of the theological series. It would require more room than we have to spare to present an outline of this, and we shall therefore offer none. A word or two upon the lecturer must suffice. That he is a highly intelligent gentleman all will acknowledge. His manner is entirely free from declamation, and without any effort at oratory, he rivets the attention of his hearers, while he unfolds his meaning with the clearness of light itself. His theological views are those of Emanuel Sweden- l)org, a Swedish nobleman, who flourished about a hundred years ago. Buck speaking of him says ;'' — Here, although hv had no room to give even " an outline " of my lecture, he quotes at length what Buck says. And thus he concludes : " Some of our readers may possil)ly be reminded by this ex- tract of some later prophets, who have sprung u^), professing to hold colloquial intercourse with ' saints and angels,' but we dismiss all such 'cor- respondences.' In all gravity we think the theo- logical doctrines of the first seventeen cfuturies the safest, and shall therefore adhere to them. Mr. F. goes from here to Springfield wlience he may proceed to St. Louis, in both of which cities he will produce a * sensation.* '" Before leaving Peoria, 1 had an opi)ort unity to learn that the following named persons had become deeply interested in the Doctrines of the New 48 LEFT FOR SPIiIN(iFlEIiD. Church, aiifl -(lesh'ous of loarniiig more alrout it, viz : Dr. and Mr3. Dickinson, J)r. lious, Mr. Alex. Cooper, Amos Bartlett, Ealph Ilanihn, II. Lightner, Merriman, Taylor, Greene, Tuttle, Bryon, Bester, Ingraham and wii'e, Eamen, Smith, Durst, Laman, Howell, Keller, Mrs. Davis, and Rev. Mr. Allen ; besides Mr. and Mrs. E. N. Powell. Having so satisfactorily accomplished the object for which I visited Peoria,* 1 again made ready to continue my journey ; and about the middle of the night of Jan. <">th, 1843, I was awakened by the horn of the stage driver summoning me to pursue my way, and on Friday evening (the >Uh,) 1 arrived at the American Hotel, Springlield, at which place I stayed for awhile. Here I found a small society of New Church people, viz ; Mr. Isaac S. Brittain, Mr. and Mrs. C. G. McGraw, Mr. and Mrs. Farns- worth, Miss Cannon, W. L. Tal)or, Mr. and Mrs. J. C. Planck, Mr. AVright and llansome. I obtain- ed the use of the hall of the House of Piepre- sentatives for my Course of eight Lectures on the Creation and J)eliige. This was by the friendly assistance of Mr. J. Y. Scammon, of Chicago, who was present, and of Mr. E. N. Powell, of Peoria ; both of whom I had the pleasure of meeting here. These lectures were well attended by from two to four hundred persons each. One of these lectures was on the life after death. On Sunday morning, Jan. 15th, I had the plea- * After leaving I'ooiia a very long notice of my lectures ; from a cornspondent, occupying nearly three columns, ajipeared in the liajitttr ; to wliich I sent a reply. AT JACKSONVILLE, ILL. 49 sure of meeting with our New Church friends, at the house at Mr. Phinck, for worship ; on wliich occasion I explained the meaning of Blood, and why there was no remission, without shedding it. During the latter part of the time I was at Spring- field, I was kindly invited to make my home in the family of Mr. McGraw. Before I left I learned that many other persons had become interested in the Doctrines ; among whom were Mr. Peet, Mrs. Hicock, Mrs. Bowman and Mr. Jankevitch. On Thursday night, Jan. 19th, I left Springfield for Jacksonville, 25 miles distant. There was a railroad to this place, (the only one I believe in the State,) but as I was desirous of getting to Jackson- ville in good season, I concluded it to be safest and quickest to go by the stage ! which I did, and arrived there the next morning by 10 o'clock, and stayed at the Morgan House. I soon made my arrangements for a Course of Lectures here, the same as I had delivered in other places on the Creation, &c.; part of which I delivered in the Town Hall, and the other in the Court House, and Presbyterian Church. These Lectures were well attended, and attracted much attention. After I had finished, Mr. Turner, Professor of llhetoric and Belles Lettres in Illinois College, (wliich is located here,) announced his intention of delivering two lectures in refutation of my main points, at the New School Presbyterian Church, which was willingly granted him for that purpose. I could not but consider that 1 had an antagonist indeed in such a person ; the more especially as Jackson- 50 PKOF. TURNERS ATTACK, ville was noted as the seat of learning, and Athens of Illinois ! For besides the Illinois College, in which Mr. Turner was a Professor, the Methodists, and Campbellites had each a College; and there was a Seminary, or High School for young ladies. It had also two Presbyterian Churches, a Con- gregational, Methodist, Episcopal, Baptist, and Campbellite Church. And besides, Prof. Turner had so recently won much renown by the publica- tion of a work entitled '* Mormonism Exposed." So I braced up my nerves as well as I could, and went to hear how this redoubtable giant was going to demolish, in his two lectures, all that I had at- tempted to establish in about seven. And for style, for elegance, for chasteness and purity of expres- sion, I think he could scarcely have found an equal ! Let me, however, attempt, — feeble as the effort may be, to show how completely he refuted all the laws and principles, and facts, which I had advanced with so much preparation and study. " Swedenborgianism (he said), was a subversion of everything decent and sensible, — an extermination of human decency; " and that "this grotesque and upheaving system of Swedenborgianism, brings fires of desolation ; " that it " exterminates the idea of God's omnipotence;" and we "are called upon to tear up our Bibles, and believe it, on peril of our immortal souls ; yet it is only dreams, dreams, dreams ! The dreams of the Joe Smith's, and of the Swedenborgians ; " for " Joe Smith was a par- allel to Swedenborg, — only that Joe Smith had common sense, and Swedenborg was a learned AND MY REPLY. 51 fool ; and those who receive his writings, perfect fools ; " for ■*' Swedenborg's common sense was ground out by book-knowledge ; " he was " an amiable and devout rehgious maniac." His sys- tem is a " chaos of commingled blasphemies and absurdities." Tliat there is " no alternative but to be Swedenborgians or infidels ; " and their object is "to reconcile conscience to a life of sin." That this " hideous and rabid credulity, — this sneaking and drivelling system attacks Christianity and runs, or like Judas, betrays with a kiss, or stabs in the dark." It is "a mockery and mummery of religion," &c., &c. This was the style of his anathema ; but for me to reproduce his coarse, extravagant, and grotesque parodies of my argu- ments, would require much more ability than I possess, so I will not attempt it. But I was at once importuned to stay and reply to these two so- called lectures, and was I to admit that I attacked Christianity (oid ran I Or should I endeavor to do as David did, when met by the haughty Philistine ? I concluded to make the effort at least. 1 was at once surrounded by a host of friends, all desirous to aid me, by procuring a suitable place, and pay- ing me for my time and services ; but no Church could be obtained for my use ! So it was announced that I would give two lectures at the Court House in reply to Prof. Turner's two. The Court House was packed full each evening ; hut Prof. Tamer was not there either time.' But for a man that was absent, it was very generally admitted that he was about as well dissected as he might ever expect to 52 NEWBPAPKR NOTICES. ii I be. I know that those wlio had felt most outraged by his coarse and rude attack ui)on the ])roi)rietiea and amenities of civihzed society, breathed freely again ! With all his prestige they pronounced him a " used up man ; " and they predicted that he would not interfere with the next stranger, who- ever he might be, who came to Jacksonville to lec- ture. Since then I have learned that Prof. Turner had admitted his error; and that if he does not fully accept the doctrines of the New Church, he at least has great respect for them, — and in latter years we became very good friends. After this, by very particular request, 1 was induced to deliver five more lectures on the Doctrine of the Lord, and human lledemption and Salvation ; and the life after death ; and I may mention, as among those who became much interested in, and very favor- able to the doctrines, Jas. Berdan, Esq., J)r. Owen, IJr. C. B. Tabriskie, M. Long, Andrew. F. Wilson, Jos. W. King, Elizur Wolcott, Jacob W. Tabriskie, ifec. The Editor of the llUnoian published at Jacksonville, gave a somewhat ludicrous account of Swedenborg in the next week's papers ; but eased it off by saying, " It must be gratifying to Mr. Field to know that his lectures have been well attended, and much anxiety manifested in his be- half." But the following week there appeared an article of two columns and a half in length, headed, " Mr. Field's Lectures in Jacksonville, — his system of geology, and the outcry of the preachers of the different churches against the lecturer." In which, after giving a brief synopsis of what I had K FAVOllABLE COMMENTS. 53 said in regard to the modus operandi of the creation of the earth, conckided by saying, "Thus miicli for Mr. Field's views of the formation and subsequent changes of the earth. They are not original with him, neitlier are they pecuhar to him. Those views are held by the most learned men of the present age, and are clearly supported by known facts, and the rosearches of the geologist. There is one thing that is a mat- ter of some astonishment to us, and that is, that the preachers of the Gospel, and the believers in the Mosaic account of the creation, in this vicinity, should take alarm at the promulgation of those views ; and what is worse, tliat they should, by ridicule and abuse, attempt to prevent the subject from being examined; or what is the same thing, attempt to prevent the people from going to hear the question discussed. If they would study the sciences, and read their Jiildes, they would see that those views do not necessarily militate against the account of the creation and the cU'luge, as shown in the Book of Genesis. But whether it does or not, shall the subject not be examined ? Does the evidence of the truth of that account rest upon such a doubtful basis, that it will not stand the test of human scrutiny ? No, it will stand the test ; and the truths of geology will only tend to corroborate its truths, and make its recital more manifest. Do those gentlemen, in their fanaticism and tyranny, intend to gag this community, and to smother investigation? If their doctrines are true, (and I believe they are,) why should they fear 54 LECTURES IN ALTON to have them examined ? It ia a poor coinpliment upon their creeds and system of religion, that they fear to have them examined, and compared with any other system. Now the Bihle, and the Chris- tian religion never lost anything hy free enquiry ; the more it is examined, the clearer and hrighter will its truths appear ; therefore we would advise those gentlemen hereafter to adopt the following motto, for their guide upon this and all other sub- jects : — * He that will not reason is a bigot, — he that dare not is a slave, — and he that cannot is a fool.'" On the Otli of February, 1843, I left Jack- sonville and proceeded to Alton, whore I delivered a course of seven lectures, which, although well attended, did not attract the attention they most likely otherwise would have done, from the fact Dr. Boy neon had the public ear at that time, he having preceded me by a few days, — and was lec- turing and experimenting on Mesmerism, which had just th(>n begun to be famous, and being a very popular lecturer, and having secured the best nail in the city, the popular attention was directed to him — and as his exhibitions took place every even- ing, I labored under considerable disadvantage in my efforts to interest the people, either in a new Theology, or a new Cosmogony. Still my lectures were very respectably attended, and attracted a good deal of attention. I found here a few silent receivers of the New Church doctrines, Dr. Skill- man, Capt. llider, Mr. Leonard, Mr. Buffom, Mr. Arnold, and there was living within three or four miles, a Mr. Copley, (brother of the Mr. C. in AND BELLEVILLE, ILL. 55 Michigan), but some of these gentlemen I did not see. Some few others also became interested in the Doctrines. On the lOtli of February I found myself at St. Louis, wliere I was kindly received and entertained by our friend and brother in the Church, Mr. Francis B. Murdoch ; but after remaining there nearly a week and finding every public hall en- gaged, and no immediate prospect of obtaining one, I concluded it best to go to Belleville, (111.,) 15 miles from St. Louis, and lecture there, and then return. So, on the 21st, I went there, and put up at the Mansion House, — the dining room of which Mr. Dickens had made famous in his then recent work, entitled "American Notes," as a Coio Shed .' In this village I delivered eight lectures ; which were not very r merously attended; the population being mostly German and illiterate, still there was much to interest me here ; one person, Mr. Chas. Gleim, was highly delighted with all that he heard, and received it gladly ; another person also seemed not less so ; this was Dr. James Mel- rose, then practising Phrenology, who, under a fictitious name, was made to figure in a very over- drawn manner, by the same distinguished writer (Chas. Dickens), who met with him at the above hotel, which he had reached, as he said, by wading through a continuous sea of mud from St. Louis, — in which there was no variety, except in its depth ! Besides Mr. Gleim and Dr. Melrose, there were several others who became deeply interested in the Doctrines ; among them I might name Dr. iwn 5C LKFT FOR ST. LOUIS. Eandle, — Mr. F.M. Gleim, — L. D. Cabanne, — \Vm» C. Davis, — John Riggles, — A. G. Bragg, and Isaac Terrill. Mr. Cabanne gave me five dollars to ex- pend for him in the purchase of N. C. books at St. Louis, and send him, which I did ; and I learned they were read with great avidity and satisfaction. Soon after I left Belleville 1 received a letter from Mr. Gloira, in which he says, — " I hear that you are lecturing to a very large and respectable audience. I am glad to hear it, as your lectures will induce many like myself, to get more know- ledge of Swedenborg. It seems that the people here have got hold of John Wesley's writing in opposition to the New Church, and all hold on to it with much power. I would like to get an anti- dote, because I feel conscious within me that Wesley is wrong, though the motive which urged him might be pure; if I could explain this matter, I could glide along smoothly ; if Mr. Murdoch has anything in refutation, please get it for me, and send it over; I will take good care, or I will buy it, if it can be had for money. I have read nearly all those books you purchased for me, and have re- ceived new light. I feel as though I can see my way clear towards heaven; not to worship a dread- ful God, — but one of love and truth." On the 28th of February, having accomplished "vv^'•t I could at Belleville, I paid my fare to go by stage at 4 o'clock next morning, to St. Louis j 1 4 the driver failed to call for me, so I had to hire 4 liorse and buggy; and Dr. Melrose was kind enough to drive me over. It was a bitter, cold day ; 1 I MY LECTURES THEIlE. IT \ but I was obliged to go, as arrangements had been made for me to commence a Course of Lectures in St Louis that evening. I was again kindly received and entertained during my stay in the City, at the house of Mr. F. 13. Murdock. I commenced my Lectures in the Lyceum Hall ; but afterwards had fitted up for me a very good room in the Meclianics' Institute. I delivered my Course of Lectures on the Creation and J^uluge, which then consisted of seven, and afterwards, by urgent request, I deliv- ered six others, on the Doctrines of the Church. The Lectures were well attended, and (excited a good deal of interest and enciuiry. A communication appeared in the St. Louis Evening Gazette, written by a Catholic, who attended my Lectures, in which he thus speaks of them : " There has not been a greater source of infidelity on matters of religion than the apparent discordance of revelation with the theories promulgated during the last century, concerning the creation of the world. Many to whoin the mysteries of Christianity, (on account of their incomprehensibihty,) had given rise to doubt and distrust as to their Divine origin, — had their doubts confirmed, and their distrust verified by the researches of the geologist. The atheist exulted, whilst the Christian deplored that these investiga- tions should sap the su])erstructure upon which his faith and hopes had been built. The Book of Genesis received a new construction in the hand of the theologian, and forced interpretations, to suit the views of the new theories, were advanced by the learned. Speculations have succeeded 58 OPINIONS OF THE PRESS. I speculation, ■which have only tended to enveloj^e in still greater mystery and ol)scurity the significa- tion of the "Word of God. Men have involuntarily rejected the Scriptures, as the evidences in the material world tended to prove that the relation, given in the Mosaic account of the creation was untrue. Eeason was the light by which they had been guided to these conclusions, — and therefore, all that would not admit of actual demonstration, was not assented to. Voltaire, Volney, Paine, and other infidel writers, are then sought after, as the / advocates of the infallibility of human reason.^ The wholesome restraints of Christian morality are then disregarded as incompatible with the liberty of man, and the Christian has thus been trans- formed into the sensualist.^' Now if an interpreta- tion of the Book of Genesis can be made so as to accord with the known laws of physics, and the established principles of geology, so as to bring conviction to the mind of the infidel of the agree- ment of the Bible in the most minute particulars to these laws and principles, — much will be at- tained.^ I had designed to have given some of the views advanced in a Course of Lectures on the Sun ; — earth, and other planets, which have elicited the above refiections ; but having already encroached on your columns, I must forbear, — assuring your readers, that in case Mr. G. Field delivers another Course, they will find the above assertions fully sustained in the originality of his opinions, deliv- ered in the peculiarly argumentative and forcible language, interspersed with beautiful and sublime , ! RESPECTING MT LECTURE8. 59 images and comparisons, at once pleasing and impressive." The Union Banner also had the fol- lowing editorial notice, under the head of " Lec- ture ON THE Creation of the Universe. The introductory Lecture was exceedingly interesting. Although not abundant with the blandishments and graces of oratory, his thoughts were conveyed in such a natural spiritedness of style, earnestness of manner, and simple elegance of diction as would enchain the attention of the most fastidious. The subject was treated in a powerful and brilliant manner. The reasoning was profound and per- spicuous ; minute, and comprehensive ; the allu- sions appropriate and illustrative; the arrangement ingenious ; — the method and ideas, to us, strikingly original, and clothed in pleasing and sparkling imagery. As he progressed, the gates of the mind seemed striving to burst asunder, that the sublime infinity of the subject might enter, to expand and elevate the soul. Such entertainment makes depravity ashamed ; carries back the heart to ages of primitive piety, — prompts it to legitimate exer- cise, refines and ennobles our being ;^nd gives the Christian that confidence and assurance in His Maker's word, as enables him to sustain with forti- tude and resignation, the jeers and calumny of •^nfidelity." There were a few receivers of the /Doctrines of the Church at St. Louis at this time. / A few months previous, i.e. in September, 1842, ' + the Rev. T. 0. Prescott had been to St. Louis, and delivered two or three discourses there. He then •went to Illinois, and returned to St. Louis about 60 REPORT OF WESTERN CONVENTION. the first of November, when he delivered a Course of very able and interesting Lectures on the Doc- trines of the Church, at Lyceum Hall ; which, though not largely attended, seemed to make a good impression,, On the 20tli of the same month, Mr. P. baptized three adults and nine children ; and instituted a Society composed of the following members, viz., Josej)h Barnard, Timoth.y Keith, Charles E. and Eliza B, Anderson, Susan Barnard, Margaretta Barnard, John Barnard, and F. B. Murdock. This Society met for worship at their respective houses every Sabbath, Mr. Jos. Barnard being elected leader. It was three months after this that I made my first visit to St. Louis, and in re- ference to which the Society say in their report to the " Western Convention," at its session, the fol- lowing May : ** In February (1843), Mr. George Field, of Battle Creek, Michigan, came to St. Louis and delivered eleven lectures upon scientific and theological subjects. IMost of these lectures were delivered in the Hall of the Mechanics' Institute, which was fitted up for him. They were well at- tended, and excited in the public mind a high de- gree of interest ; — we may say astonishment. It was interesting to see, night after night, the same persons, occupying almost the same seats, listen- ing with the most profound attention to a man who seemed to them to have unravelled all the mysteries of creation and of the Divine Word. He is still talked about, and will long be remembered. Mr. Field's labors here arrested the attention of -••■ A NEW CHURCH LIBRARY FORMED. 61 many persons. One of the most remarkable con- sequences of these labors is the formation of a Society, (which originated amongst, and is com- posed principally of, persons not members of the Church,) called ' a Society for the examination of the writings of the Hon. Emanuel Swedenborg.''^ The purpose in forming this Society, was, to raise by subscription, a fund, for the purchase of the Theological and Scientitic Works of Swedenborg, which, when obtained, are to be kept by a librarian for the use of the members; and to be loaned out to persons not members, upon paying a small com- pensation. Fifty dollars have already been raised, and as much more, we doubt not, will be obtained, if wanted." " This Society was organized a few days ago by the adoption of a Constitution, and electing Dr. Chas. F. Lott, President, and F. B. Murdock Secretary, Treasurer and Librarian." That Society was composed of persons who were Catholics, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, Metho- dists and New Churchmen, and were to *' meet €very two weeks, (or oftener if desired,) at the Li- brary, for the purpose of conversation upon the writings and doctrines of the New Church." Dr. Boynton, whom I had met at Alton, came to St. Louis while I was there, to lecture on Mesmerism ; he professed to be fully convinced of the truthful- ness of Swedenborg's teachings, altliough he rarely let anyone else know it. He afterwards liecame a very popular lecturer, and was well known all over the country. Among others who became most in- terested in the doctrines, in addition to those I 62 DEPARTURE FROM ST. LOUIS. have already named, I may mention Mr. Charles Barnard, Mr. Hale, Mr. and Mrs. Stephens, Mr. Gooson and wife, Mr. Anderson, Sen., Mr. Moffat and wife, Mr. Powell, Mr. Morton, Mr. January, Mr. Edgar and brother, Mr. Hardy, Capt. Fithian, Capt. Burnham, Miss Mary McKee, Wm. Mckee, and Mrs. Murdock. Whilst lecturing in this city, I received three letters, remailed to me from Belle- ville, by the same post, although written at inter- nals of a week apart, informing me of my wife's suddjen and severe illness ; next of its being dan- gerous ; and the third one that I received that I must hasten home if I would see her alive. So I made immediate arrangements for leaving, and on Thursday morning, March IGth, took stage for home. But travelHng was slow and tedious then, and there was considerable snow on the ground, sometimes even covering the fences; but by Sat- urday evening I arrived at Peoria, where I received another letter informing me that my wife was better ; so I stayed to rest at night, and on the Sabbath, when, by urgent request, I delivered a discourse in the morning and afternoon ; and in the evening again took the stage for home. The The lectures at Peoria were delivered in the Court House, to very large and attentive audiences; and a strong desire was expressed for me to come and make Peoria my home, and devote myself to the uses of the ministry in accordance with the order and usages of the Church. Indeed, I was told that a subscription paper was in circulation to see how much they could raise for t RETURN TO BATTLE CREEK. 63 that purpose, and they ah-eady had $500.00 sub- scribed towards the first year. But, as I had no thought or desh-e at that time of leaving Michigan, I told them I could not respond to their kind wishes. I arrived in Chicago on Tuesday after- noon, March 21st, stayed over night at Mr. Scam- mon's, and next morning proceeded on my way, and on Thursday reached Edwardsburg, where 1 received another letter informing me that my wife was dead ! and at the time I received the letter she had been buried three days ! Next morning I hastened onward to Constantine, thence to Kala- mazoo, from which place I hired a man and a cutter to take me to Battle Creek, where I arrived on Saturday evening, March 25th, 1843, at half-past nine o'clock. I found strangers living in my house, my three little children scattered into as many families, and all of us without any home. After collecting my bills for the many expenses which had been incurred, and defraying them, I found that I bad expended almost all the little that I had received over and above my expenses during the six months I had been away : but as there had been other work provided for me during my absence, the time for entering upon which, however had not yet fully arrived, I shall take advantage of the in- terval, whilst recuperating for a few weeks at Battle Creek, to go back a little, and state what had been done in Michigan during my absence in Illinois, ii-c. I have already stated that whilst I was at Niles, arrangements had been completed for calling a meeting of the Readers and Receivers of 64 THE MEETING AT ALBION. the Heavenly Doctrines in Michigan and Northern Indiana to assemble at All)ion, for the purpose of Instituting a New Church Association on the 2nd day of January, 1843. This was done by Mr. A. Silver writing to all such persons as were known to reside West of Albion ; and by Mr. E. I). Fisher to those who lived East of that place. In conse- ■quence of which there assembled at the house of Mr. R. H. Murray on that day, the following persons, viz.: Mr. Jacob King, and Mr. Charles Hinkle, of Marshall ; ^Ir. David W. Howell, and Mr. and Mrs. W. G. Wheaton of Battle Creek, Mr. Abiel Silver, of Edwardshurg ; Mr. Hans, and Mr. Henry Thielson, of Jackson ; Mr. and Mrs. E. D. Fisher, of Woodruff's Mills, Brighton, (near Kensington,) Livingstone Co.; Mr. and Mrs. R. H. Murray, of Albion ; Justus Dobbin of Ann Arbor ; also Mr. Henry Weller of Marshall ; and Miss Ann Parker of Battle Creek ; the two latter, though being in- terested in the Doctrines, took no part in the Pro- ceedings : — in all,numbcring fifteen persons. Letters of encouragement and assistance were also received and read from J. Y. Scammon, of Chicago, 111., M. H. Piollin, of Goshen, Ind. ; John T. Little, of Farmington, Oakland Co. Mich.; C. P. Bush, "of Genoa, Livingstone Co., Mich., George Corselius, of Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Saml. Hall and Mrs. S. M. H. Dorr, of Detroit, Mich.; and Mr. John Harford, of Lima, Mich. After the necessary con- sultation in regard to what they proposed to ac- complish, the following Resolution was adopted, via : — a. ^ ASSOCIATION ORGANIZED. 65 ^ " Reaolreil, That we, now present, Readers and Receivers of the Doctrines of the New Jerusalem Church, do hereby form ourselves into a Society to be known as the ' Association of Readers and Receivers of the Doctrines of the New Jerusalem Chm-ch in Michigan and Northern Indiana.' " After which, Rules for organization, and the election of a President, Secretary and Treasurer were adopted ; and Mr. Jacob King, (the oldest Receiver of the Doctrines in the range of the Association), was elected President ; and Robert H. Murray Secretary and Treasurer. What was next done I copy from the rannuscript of the Secretary of that meeting as recorded in his Book : which states that — " The following Preamble and Resolutions were then successively offered, and unanimously adopt- ed by the Association : — ''WJurcas, Mr. George Field, of Battle Creek, in this State, is personally well known to several members of this Association ; and to the remain- der, by well f!stablished reputation ; and whereas we consider him to be a man of good moral char- acter, and well qualified to teach and preach the Doctrines of the New Jerusalem Church, — there- fore, " Resolved, That the Secretary be, and he is hereby requested to prepare a certificate of these facts, and a recommendation, in the name of this Association, of Mr. George Field, for ordination into the New Church Ministry ; and, with the pro- ceedings of this meeting, to forward the same to the Ecclesiastical Committee of the Western Con- E 66 RESOLUTIONS. vention of the New Church, soliciting its action, and that of the Acting Committee, for the imme- diate accomphshment of the wishes of the Associa- tion. *' lieHolred, That the Secretary be, and he is hereby requested to forward to Mr. George Field, the proceedings of this meeting, and to tender him, in the name of the Association, a call to the Minis- try of the New Church, in the district of country which it includes ; conditional upon his receiving ordination, or license to preach ; and on that con- dition, to pledge to him in its name, should he accept this cail, the sum of money guaranteed at this meeting for his services during the present year. " Resolved, That all receivers, and readers of the Doctrines, residing in the State of Michigan, or in the northern part of Indiana, are invited to become members of this Association, — to be present at its meetings, — to communicate to it any information they may have in relation to the state of the Church in their vicinity, and to make any sugges- tions which they may deem of use to the Associa- tion. '' liesolvid, That we herebv recommend to each other, and to those who, with us, are willing to contribute to the support of the objects of the Association, that they pay to Mr. Field himself, should he become our jMinister, upon his visiting them, the proportion of the amounts intended for him, due upon the circuit. *' licsoked, That it be recommended to Mr. Field, f^. CHICA30 INCLUDED. er in the case heretofore provided, that he make his circuits or tours, semi-annually; stopping one, two, or three weeks in a place, according to its size, — the effect apparently produced, and the amount subscribed for his services. '* Whereas, a communication from Chicago, 111., solicits the ministerial services of Mr. Field, at that place, and offers to pay a proportional part of his salary, — therefore, " liesolvcd, That it be recommended to Mr. Field, upon his becoming our Minister, to extend his cir- cuit to that city. " liesolvcd, That the Secretary be requested to prepare for publication, and forward an account of the proceedings of this meeting to the Editors of the New Jerusalem Magazine and New Churchman, also to the Acting Committee of the Western Con- vention.* ^^ Resolved, That the next Annual meeting of this Association be at Battle Creek, on the first Wed- nesday of January, 1841, Adjourned. "PtOBT. H. :^[rRRAY Secretary. "Albion, January 2nd, 1813."' The following is a " Sfcatemont of Subscriptions for the salary of Mr. George Field, during the full year of his engagement," which he was to collect himself as he might be able, while on his tour : viz. • A brief account of the Kame, together with tlie above Resolutions, appeared in the ^V. jerusaletn Ma<h< vol. IG, page 317, — and in the New Churchman, toI. 2, page 188. t 68 I '3 II AMOUNT SUBSCRIBED. By Jacob King, for Marshall $15 OO " Charles Hiukle, for Marshall 10 00 " Abiel Silver, for Edwardshurg 25 00 •' David W, Howell, for Battle Creek . . , 15 00 " Hans and Henry Thielson, of Jacksou 25 00 " E, D. Fisher, of Brigliton 10 00 " R. H. Murray, of Albion 20 00 " J. Y. Scammon, for Chicago 60 00 •• J. T. Little, of Farmington 5 00 " M. II. RoUin, for Goshen, Ind 40 00 " Mrs. J. R. Dorr, of Detroit 15 00 $2H0 00 EXPECTED FROM C. P. and R. Bush of Genoa $20 00 Detroit 10 00 Ann Arbor 10 00 Dexter and Lima 5 00 Prairie Roude 20 00 Homer 5 00 St. Joseph 30 00 Elkhart 20 00 »120 00 Total $350 00 The following is a copy of the communication sent to the Ecclesiastical Committee of the New Church Western Convention : — ** Dear Brethren, — Inclosed I send you the Minutes, of the Proceedings of a meeting of Eead- ers and Eeceivers of the Doctrines of the New Jeru- salem Church, convened at this place on the 2nd inst., to which I respectfully ask your attention.* In accordance with the instructions therein given me, as Secretary of the Association then organized, *A copy of the above Proceedings, together with a reference to my Missionary tour just published, accompanied this. i APPLICATION TO CONVENTION. 69 ^ i I beg leave to represent to the Committee, in behalf of said Association, that Mr. George Field, the bearer ot this communication, is personally well known to a majority of those present at the meeting above mentioned ; and by reputation to the remainder ; that all testified their perfect confidence in the goodness of his moral character, and his fitness for the duties of a* Minister ; and that by a unanimous vote, the Association gave a formal ex- pression to these sentiments. The Association of Keaders and Receivers of the Doctrines of the New Jerusalem Church, in Michigan, and Northern Indiana, therefore, entertaining these opinions, and desirous of engaging brother Field as Missionary for the region of country represented by the Asso- ciation does hereby recommend to the Ecclesiastical Committee of the Western Convention, that Mr. George Field, of this State, be ordained a Minister of the Lord's New Church, fully authorized and empowered to lead in public worship, — to preach the truths and doctrines of the New Jerusalem Church, — to administer the ordinances of Baptism, and the Holy Supper, to officiate at funerals and weddings ; and, under the authority, and at the request of the Western Convention, and in such a manner as it may prescribe, to ordain others into the Ministry of the New Church. And we respect- fully request that the Committee will, as soon as may be, give to this, our recommendation and desire, a favorable consideration, and we hope, if it be admissible, that without waiting for the meeting •of the Convention, the Acting Committee may I i ill f!( 70 I ACCEPT THE CALL. accord a confirmation of your compliance with our earnest wish. Signed, Jacob King, President, Ilobt. H. Murray, Secretary, Abiel Silver, E. D. Fisher, Hans Thielson, Henry Thielson, Charles Hinkle, David W. Howell, William G. Wheaton, Justin Dobbin. " By EoBT. H. Murray, "Secretary. "Albion, Michigan, Jan. 29th, 1843." Together with the above documents, Mr. Mur- ray, as Secretary of the Association, wrote me a very kind and hopeful letter, in which also he gave me a cordial invitation to come to his house when I came to Albion, for I think it was fully expected that I should accept the offer thus made mo. This letter, and the accompanying documents had been detained for some time in the hands of the Secre- tary, before they were mailed ; but reached me whilst I was in St. Louis ; but the circumstances then occurring and already related, prevented me from replying sooner than the 28th of March, whilst in Battle Creek. The proposition was in every way agreeable to me ; and it opened up an orderly and legitimate way of promulgating the Doctrines of the Church, as well as conducting its public worship. I am conscious that I had already been transcending my proper function and use in the manner I had pro- claimed and taught the Doctrines. It certainly was not my intention to do so ; but I often found myself exposed to great uncertainty as what I ought to do in the peculiar circumstances in which INADEQUATE PROVISION. 71 ',; I found myself placed, and with no one to consult with, or advise me ; and this ditliculty increased as I went on, rather than diminished. But now a way presented itself by which this irregularity could be avoided, by being, with the full consent and approbation of my brethren, ordained into the Ministry of the New Church ; and I therefore wrote my acceptance of their call to the IMinistry, and to become their Missionary. Still the means provid- ed for doing this were not j^articularly encourag- ing. Here was a range of country for me to visit, of nearly three hundred miles in length, from East to West; i.e., from Detroit to Chicago; and by cross country routes, often without any stages, from Goshen, Ind., to the heavy timbered lands of Livingston and adjoining Counties in Michigan. And whilst tlnis travelling, my tlu-ee little children, now motherless, the oldest only eight years old, and the youngest only a year and a half, had to be put out to board. And what were the means pro- vided for me to meet my expenses with ? For the year, there was prnmiaed $'280.00; and in expect- ancy, si'iO.OO more, which, if all realized, would be $320.00 ; and out of this I had to pay my ex- penses for board, &c., whilst staying eight weeks at Battle Creek, till tlie Convention should assem- ble at Cincinnati; and also to pay my fare, &c., in getting there. But nothing discouraged by the prospects I re- solved to do the best I could, and trust in the [)ro- vidence of the Lord for the rest. So, on the lltli of May, 1843, I again left Battle Creek, on my way ill l> I i>l IM I: n W'- 72 I SET OUT FOR CONVENTION. to attend the meeting of the "Western Conven- tion," soon to assemble at Cincinnati. I stayed one day at Albion, with Mr. and Mrs. Murray, — and about four days at Detroit, with ]\Ir. and Mrs. Dorr. Mrs. D. was a member of the Boston N. C. Society, and besides her, there were then living in Detroit a Mrs. Abby Russell, sister of the late Samuel Wood worth, — Mr. and Mrs. Samuel Hall, (Mrs. H. being a sister of liev. N. C. Burnham), and a Mr. and Mrs. Wood, recent receivers. I next proceeded rui Sandusky City, and Tiflhi, to Columbus, Ohio, where I remained two days with Mr. Josiali Espy, one of our sterling New Church- men. Whilst there I delivered a lecture at the Court House, on Thursday evening. May 18th, on the nature of the eternal world. From thence I went to Springfield, and stayed a day or two, and delivered the same lecture that 1 had given at Cclumbus ; both lectures being well attended. Thence I proceeded to Dayton, and arrived there in time to deliver a discourse (to the few New Churcli friends who lived there), on Sunday morn- ing ; staying, whilst there, with my very old and excellent friends, Mr. and Mrs. Amos Richards. On IMonday evening. May 22nd, I left Dayton by Canal Boat, for Cincinnati, where I arrived on Tuesday morning. May 23rd, and was kindly re- ceived and entertained at the house of Mr. and Mrs. Milo G. Williams. The next day (Wednes- day), the Convention assembled in the House of Worship, which was then on Longworth street. My credentials were duly presented, and the Eccle- i MY ORDINATION. 73 siastical Committee reported to the Convention, that they had " taken the above appUcation into careful consideration, (and) would recommend the above application to the Western Convention, now in session, for its concurrence ; and that Mr. George Field, be empowered to lead in public worship, to preach the truths and doctrines of the New Jeru- salem Church ; to administer the ordinances of Baptism, and the Holy Supper ; and to officiate at weddings and funerals: and to perform all otlier duties appertaining to the Ministerial Office, except that of ordaining other ministers. (Signed,) " Maskell M. Carll, " Adam Hurdus, " Nathaniel Holley, " T. 0. Prescott." The above Report recommends a comi> ianee with everything that was asked for by the M. & N. In. Association, "except that of ordaining other Ministers." And it will be seen by the lieport of the Convention for that year, that " Mr. George Field was, by the imposition of hands, ordained into the ^Ministry of the Lord's New Church, by the Revs. M. M. Carll, and A. Ilurdus," with the power aforesaid. It will be perceived that all the authority asked for by the Association had not been conceded. There was a somewhat divided sentiment in the New Church in regard to degrees in the Ministry; some favoring only one order, some two, andotliers three. In the General Convention at that time, three were recognized ; but in the Western Conven- .asmamsmum r 74 THE AUTHORITY BESTOWED. iii tion only one; although indirectly admitting more, but without defining the province of each; only making such ''regulations as occasion may de- mand ;" and " which maybe changed and modified according to exigencies;" so that neither the doctrine of jMrity was recognized, — nor of three distinct degrees ; — but I was ordained with certain powers, giving me authority to perform certain Ministerial acts, which in ^luded all that is contained in the full powers of an Ordaining Minister, as then recognized by the General Convention, except that of ordaining othere, which was a part of the pre- rogative of the third degree.* So that really my ordination was equivalent to the exercise of all the functions of the first and second degrees, as provided for in the General Convention, and a portion of those of the third, which therefore als(j gave me power to "institute and receive Societies into the New Church," and, (although, it would seem as if this should only be, in the absence of a fully ordained Minister), — "to preside at the meetings of Conven- tion, and of Association; and to administer the Holy Supper on those occasions. Jiut there was • It will be seen tliutthe form used, and the powers granted, were substantially the same as those used in the ordination of David Powell, of Steul)enville, Ohio; and Eichard II. Goe, near Wheeling, V: .inia ; each of whom was ordained by M. M. Carll, as " a priest, and teaching minister in the Lord's Church of the New Jerusalem, with power to conduct public worship, to celebrate the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, marriages, baptisms, and funerals ; and generally to perform all holy rites and Divine ordinances if the Church, except that of ordaining other priests aud miuisterp ," See iV. J. Mag. \o\\ 44, page 503. ON MY MISSIONARY TOUR. 75 also another Clerical use, not then entertained by the General Convention, but which was by the Western, — which was the granting of Licenses for limited periods; and as this did not involve ordain- ing powers, was clearly included in those functional uses into which I was inaugurated. My first Sermon as an ordained Minister, was preached before the Convention in the afternuon of the same day that I was thus ordained, viz., Sunday, May 28th, 181:3. After the adjournment of the Convention, I deliv- ered, by especial request, my Course of Lectures on the Creation and Deluge? at College Hall, in Cincin- nati ; which were well attended, and were the sul)jects of numerous editorial and other remarks in the newspapers ; but as my intention is to give my reminiscences of the first promulgation of the New Church Doctrines in tlie West ; and as a Society of the New Church had been in existence many years in this city, I pass on to other places, and other scenes ; with the remark that, Ijefore leaving Cincinnati, I went over to Covington (Ky.), on Sunday p.m., June the 11th, and delivered a Discourse there on the nature of the Life after Death.* June 15th, I left Cincinnati for Cokanbus; and on Saturday evening, the 17th, gave my Intro- ductory Lecture to the Course on the Creation, &c., at the Old Court House ; being kindly entertained whilst there at the house of Mr. and ^[rs. Evan * A pretty full account of the newHpaper controversy in Cinciunati, respectiiif^ my lectures tliere, may be fouud iu the • Retina," at pages iH) and 100. 76 LECTURES IN COLUMBUS. Gwynn. There were a few New Church people living here then, but no Society, or meetings for worship, and little or nothing known of the Doc- trines beyond these few ; so I shall state briefly how the views I presented were received. Although the weather was very warm, being the middle of June ; and the evenings short, my Lectures were well attended, and by the most intelligent people in the place. The Lectures were free, and no collec- tions taken up ; but at their close, a few gentlemen said to me, that they had been highly entertained and much instructed, and wished to make me an acknowledgment of it ; and at the same time pre- sented me with a purse containing $>20.00. As an expression of the interest manifested I will present fiome of the comments, and points of discussion raised by my Lectures in the city papers. The •Ohio State Journal, of June 22nd, after stating the subject of my Lectures, says: "Mr. Field is a man of thought and of science, and whatever may be tlionG;lit of his positive declarations of the opera- tions of natural laws, and ot the truths and out- ward existences to the phenoiAena of mind, his Lectures are very interesting, and he makes him- self clearly understood. We suppose, of course, that in investigating that su])ject which he seems to have so much at lieart, for the truth's sake, he has had due reference to the ori(jinal, in consider- ing the import of words, sentences, and figures ; but in our understanding of his system, it seems to us that a true translation of the word 'light,' in the expression * Let there be light,' would militate !il ON THE WORD " LIGHT." 77 against it, we were informed, in a late conversation with one of the first scholars and philosophers of this country and age, that the proper signification of the word rendered * light,' is Unhtninfi, electricity, or the elements of natural light, according to the theory of solar light and heat, as entertained by- many of the philosophers of the present day." To the above I sent the following reply, which was duly inserted. CRITICISM ON THE WORD LIGHT. " To the Editor of the State Journal. " Sir, — I notice in your paper of this afternoon, a criticism on the word * Light,' on which you* say in our understanding of his [myj system, it seems to us that a true translation of the word ' light,' in the expression * Let there be light,' would militate against it. Wo were informed in a late conversa- tion with one of the first scholars of this country and age, that the proper signification of the word rendered 'light,' is liiilttniiifj, — electricity, or the element of natural light, &c. Permit me here to observe that every effort has been made to recon- cile if possible the iirst chapter of Genesis with the philosophy of the natural creation ; with this end in view, some have endeavored to prove that tho sun was created on the Jlrst day, in order to account for the presence of light ; others, as you shew^ would have it appear that thf lighi, was not pro- ■" I" --- -- »...««.». -Ml, 78 LIGHT OR LIGHTNING. If] ' I i i 1 i perly light, but I'uihtning, electricity, or light in a latent form ; yet that these views are far-fetched, and that they militate against each other, might easily appear. That the word 'light' is correctly translated there can be no room for doubt ; not only from the fact that all known translation^ ^ so render it, and the ablest philologists admit it ; but the context demands it. *' In Bellamy's translation he says, the sentence reads thus, 'Be light, and light was:' and not only that " the w^ord aour means the lujht, but also that it conveys the idea of the light as flowing from the sun. This would fully appear from the subject treated of, " And God divided the light from the darkness, and God called the I'uiht day ; and the darkness He called night ; and the evening and the morning were the first day. Now if for the word 'Ucjht,' 3'ou will substitute 'Uf/htnuifi,' or 'electriciti/,' you will perceive that it will make no sense at all. The very terms morning and evening,-day and night, necessarily impl}' tlie presence or absence of Ufiht, and not Hiihtnliiri. 'And God called the light (aour) day,' (yom). Profs. Stuart, and Granville Penn, both eminent Hebrew scholars, have taken the most decided stand as to the literality of the word ' 'hii/ ;' and insist that it means that which we alone understand by that term, that is, a period of twenty-four hours ; and, says the former gentleman, — ' If Moses has given us an erroneous account of the creation, so be it, — let it come out, and let us have the whole. But do not let us turn aside his language to get rid of difficul- SYMiiOLic Language. 79 ties that we may have in our speculations.' — I therefore submit that the transLations of these words is correct ; and the more my attention is called to this subject, the more fully do I see the force of the position I have laid down ; namely, that natural images are made use of, to present, in the beautiful language of (■orrcspondences, men- tal, or spiritual trutlis, which was the language of high anticjuity ; and of which I have shewn that fragments remain to this very day ; and by gath- ering up a few, permit me to hope that I may have thrown some I'KjJit, on this hitherto obscure subject; and that the Ixuiius of truth may illiuninate our dark ti CSS ; and that the Sun of heaven may be a li(jht unto our feet, and a lamj) unto oni' jjaths ; for at present it is but too true, that * The world is wrapped in shade,— the darkest &^e pansini/, Has hardly stirred the drapery yet, that Jiangs upon the nations ; Olden tliiwjs will soon give place to ne r, for lo, A 7iew heaven and a neir earth arc forniinij. Look around wliere Science strn<j()linij with the shades of fiirfht. Breaks like the Borealis, througli the gloom, stax'tling the ilniui menty A heavenly sign that virtue is rex^irintj among men. truth, And the celestial marriage, so long lost, of goodness with its Shall be restored.' "I am, yours very respectfully, "George Field, "Columbus, June 12, 1818. *' P. S. — The words italicised in the latter part of this communication, are to shew that without such natural things and actions, borrowed from the material world, no mental ideas could be coiutnun- icated." rn EDITORIAL CRITICISM. To this was appended the following editorial re- marks. "We cannot enter into a full discussion of even this one point, in which we differ from Mr. Field ; and had almost determined to publish his criticism without any intimation whether it had, or had not removed our objections. We will however barely state, that we are not convinced that the true translation of aour, is 'light,' and not matter of light. Nor are we prepared to admit that the latter translation w^ould give us merely latent light, and not that light requisite for the growth of vegetation, and for the distinction of day from night. " What the particular agent may have been which rendered those elements active, or called forth sensible light, we do not know ; but it may have been the proximity of one of these dark bodies known to sometimes interpose be- tween us and stars — perhaps a twin sister in the same stage of creation. Late investigations in electro-magnetism have resulted in discoveries which threw doubts upon the old theories of geological deposits and formations, and may thoroughly revolutionize the science (so to speak) of geology — rendering it, as they do, probable that this 'matter of light' produced an instan- taneous stratification of the primitive or interior substances of the earth. Assuming this to have been the case, we account for the mass hav- ing been thrown, by sudden condensation, into a state of fusion, and hence deduce, that by degrees the great heat at the surface was dissipated ; this - *i .■.^■t^..^Uh-^'S>^i4».. WK\K OI5.IECTION3. 81 dissipation and coolin;^, naturally progressing most rapidly at the poles, and causing, in con- junction with the centrifugal tendency of the re- volving mass, the flattening at the poles, and en- largement of the diameter at the equator, that therefore, vegetation commenced at the poles, and progressed towards the equator as rapidly as the sulHcient cooling of the surface i)rogressed, there being no rain, but the vapor, or ' mist ' condensed upon the cooler surface, supplying the moisture necessary for the growth of those gigantic tropical phmts, the remains of which are found in high northern latitudes, and many of which have now become extinct in the tropics, or have dwindled into dwarfish specimens of the luxuriant vegetation of earlier periods. But we must forbear further re- mark, not having leisure to give the subject that thouglit necessary for a proper and concise state- ment of our views ; and we trust no one will infer from what we have said that we iuive failed to receive pleasure and profit from Mr. Field's lectures." I did not reply to this ; — it did not seem neces- sary. In fact, there was nothing to reply to, but mere fanciful assumptions, which were not even attempted to be sustained by facts or philosophi- cal considerations. My points and arguments were neither disproved nor disputed, but an imag- inary supposition was raised as an attempt to ac- count for a literal ti'anshition of the text. Whilst in Columbus I delivered eight pul)lic lectures, and two discourses on the Doctrines of the Church at the house of Mr. Espy. 82 LECTURES IN DAYTON. I ) On Monday, June 20th, I left Columbus for Springfield, and stayed with Mr. John Murdoch. I delivered my course of seven lectures tliere on the Creation, &c., and also one on the doctrine of the Lord, as the alone Saviour and liedeemer ; these were at the Court House, and one other at Mr. Murdoch's house, from Luke xxiv. 41. Two or three persons came from Fairfield to attend the lectures, but the weather was so sultry and the evenings so short that they were not as fully at- tended as they would otherwise have been ; but those who did attend seemed to be very much in- terested. Among others, I may mention Mr. John H. Miller, who has since been a minister and mis- sionary in the New Church ; but is now removed to the spiritual world." On the (jth of July, 1 left Springlield, and the same evening, by previous arrangement, com- menced a course of twelve lectures at Dayton, in the Court House, (Court Houses were our New Church Temples in those days, although rarely suital)le for holding religious meetings in). These * Rev. T. O. Prescntt luid broken ground iu this place by the delivery of a Course of Lectures ou the Doctrines of the Churcii in February, 1812. lie api)lied first for the use of the Pres- byterian Church, but unsuccessfully ; then for the Methodist, which was kindly granted ; and he delivered two Lectures in it to little more than a dozen persons. He then obtained the use of an unconsecrated Episcopal Church, in which he de- livered two Lectures ;, then he went to the Court House and finished the Course, except two, which he subsequently de- livered in the Methodist Church, and these were much better attended. See Mr. Preacott's Letter iu Precursor for May, 1842. ,!^jM.mjmLiniMMVM,yu\-^^ < Mmjm i FIRST ACT OF BAPTISM. 8» lectures, notwithstanding; the hot weather and short eveninj^s, were well attendi-tl and attracted liiuch attention. There were, at that time, quite a nuinher of Now Cliureh peoide living in the city and the vicinity, and tlier^! liad been mucli talk of buildinj^ a New Church house of worship thero ; but as yet it has not l)een done. Whilst in Dayton I baptized Mrs. Broadwell, and Mr. Alfred Carter ; the latter (in coni[)any with Mr. Lord) came eleven miles to attend the lectures ; but, I am sorry to say, that in his old age he became a Spiritualist, and not only denied the Scriptures, but treated them with contempt. Whilst in Dayton 1 made my home with ^Ir. and Mr^'. Amos llichards, with whom was also living at the time Mr. Denman Koss and Mispi Caroline Cathcart (now the wife of Uuv.W. G. Day) . A reporter for one of the Dayton papers attended the lecture s, and made copious notes with the in- tention of giving a detailed outline of them in suc- cessive numbers ; but, for some reason or other, did not do so. But in the Journal and Advertiser y api)eared a long communication, from which 1 make the following extracts : — "These Lectures have now been continued to the fourth evening, with a continued increase of numbers, — and no less increase of interest, to an attentive audience ; although with some, his views are considered as the mere fruits of fantasy, or the chimeras of a delusion. This is by no moans strange, since there is no doctrine, however false, without its followers ; nor any without its opposers, however true ; if they be at war with the popular i\ \\ m 'ISI :LI IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) // i/ .<^^%' 'ip i.O I.I IM |||||2^ "^ ililM illM IIM 1 2.0 1.8 1.25 '4 1.6 M 6" 1»> V] <^ o ej e". e: /a o^ o ^;. 'm % Photographic Sciences Corporation ^^ iV s :\ V \ 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 872-4503 ^<b .V ^ '^ ^^ % V 49 O &?- w. 84 THE DAYTON PRESS opinions of the age, whether the same be of a moral, civil, scientific, or religious nature." — *' Since Mr. Field has been among us, delivering his course of Lectures, some few, who had been forced into scepticism, have seen a new light, and we hope will be able to see that there is now a highway out of Egypt. ]\rr. Field has established beyond the power of contradiction, that the Bible is written in a peculiar language, which was transmitted from God to man, through nature; and in the language of nature itself; and hence the most pure of all languages. This fact he not only proves l)y the Bible's own authority, but by ancient and profane history." " I shall now only say in conclusion, that every one who feels a desire to enquire after TRUTH for the sake of truth, may find a rich reward by going to hear IMr. Field. He appears to be a man profoundly learned in all the sciences, and has an uncommon fund of historical knowledge, and withal, they will lind him a very pleasant speaker." These remarks, however, besides being far too compliuK'iitary, contained a statement which I thought would leave a wrong impression : I have not quoted it, but its import was, that (ill the Bible w'as purely symbolical, and luid no literal sense. So I wrote a reply, in which after properly introduc- ing tlie subject, I said, "Had your correspondent said, as I have no doubt, but he intended; that these observations hold good only to the first eleven chapters of Genesis, which treat of events up to the time of Abraham, and were therefore written in that style of pure allegory which then prevailed, AND MY REPLY TO IT. 85 both in treating of things sacred and profane, there would have been no misunderstanding; l)ut at that period the knowledge of this universal language being lost, at the confusion of tongues ; a more external language began to prevail, as the character of men became more external, natural, or literal ; and that thus whilst the Divine language could be no other than the same, yet in accommodation to the state of man, for whom it was intended, the internal meaning, which before was purely allegor- ical, or symbolical, now became invested with a literal sense, and thus literally true; although, this mode of communicating Divine truth was not 80 much for the sake of the letter, as for the spirit which was within ; — and sometimes this literal sense was not intended to be strictly understood, even after the above referred to epoch, as may often be seen in the prophetic writings. But the Divine Word was first like a naked child, which afterward became clothed, exce[)ting the face and hands. And so was the Divine Word : when used by men in a celestial, or child-like state of innocence, it was naked; but as the wickedness of man rendered the mental or si)iritual atmospheres colder, as he receded from the Tree of Life, he clothed himself with fig-leaves, representative of the natural state ; or of the spiritual sense of the Word, being clothed with the letter ; and this clothing became thicker, and thicker, as it was necessary more and more to preserve from profanation the holy things of the internal sense, which renders so much of the genuine sense of the Word obscure, save where 86 ST. LOUIS AND PEORIA. the hands and face thereof arc seen." Thus, "in the Jewish dispensation, the internal sense is clothed with the literal, which is for its protection ; for over all the (/lory, it is written, there shall be a covering, or defence. George Field." Mr. Prescott had preceded me at this place by delivering a few lectures there, nearly a year and a half previously ; and there were nearly twenty adult receivers of the Doctrines in the place ; but no Society, or meetings for worship. On concluding my labors in Dayton I returned to Cincinnati, where I remained for a few days, during which time I preached at the Temple, and also at Covington, liy., and on Tuesday p.m., July 2;">th, 1 took the steamboat for St. Louis, which being rather a long journey I had a little time to rest Ijefore again resuming my Missionary labors. As the amount which I received for my services was usually quite small ; my travelling expenses consumed nearly the whole of it ; I therefore con- cluded to try the experiment of going by my own conveyance ; so, whilst I was in St. Louis I bought me a horse, buggy, and harness, for that purpose. In this way I travelled to Peoria, Avhere I stayed and delivered another Course of Lectures. This time I made my home whilst there with Mr. Ham- lin, where I was kindly entertained ; although I had to put up my horse at another place. The famous revival iireacher, Elder Knapp, was at that time attracting much attention there ; and his ful- minations against Swedenborg, and *' Swedenbor- CHICAGO, GOSHEN, ETC. 87 gians," was in his usual denunciatory style. From Peoria, I went to Ottawa, where I found com- fortable quarters with our brother Stone ; and thence to Chicago, where I was again enter- tained at the hospitable home of Mr. Scam- mon. I delivered fourteen Lectures in this City on the leading or fundamental doctrines of the New Church, which met with a very favorable reception. Thence I went to Niles, arriving there September 12th, and delivered five Lectures ; and four at Edwardsburg, (ten miles distant,) delivering them alternately at each place, every other evening. On Monday morning, September 2;")th I again went to Goshen (Ind.), 20 miles south, where I delivered a •Course of ten Lectures, which were very well attended. It was whilst I was in Goshen that I heard of Mr. Blackman, a new Churchman, living some twenty or thirty miles south, so I concluded to ride over and see him. My way was by a very rough road, through heavy timbered land, and the people very primitive and simple. Upon enquiring for Mr. Blackman, I was asked, "Ain't you Judge B's preacher ? " Upon my replying that I did not know, I was answered, " Well, he wants you to go •over and see him ; but liuding him absent from home, I was addressed by another person who said to me, " Here are the Books, (presenting two or three New Church Books), and you are to explain your religion to this man ; he's come on purpose ; but perhaps you don't know him ; he's Judge B's neighbor, — and this, (pointing me out to another), is his man." Whilst I was in Goshen this time, a ' I 88 ELKHART, ALHION, ETC. meeting was held for the inirpose of purchasing Books for the estahlishiutnt of a New Church Lihrary, in shares of one (k)nar each. A Consti- tution was franKcl, and very soon thirty shares Buhscribed for, and arrangements made for obtain- ing the Books. On ^londay October Otli 1 went to Elkhart again, where 1 (klivered a Course ol seven Lectures, which were very well attended. As I lectured every evening, I concluded this, course in a week. I then returned to Battle Creek where I had left my children, having l)een ahsent nearly half a year. I put my two youngest children out to board, and took the oldest one with me. Whilst in Battle Creek this time, 1 bai)tized the three children of Mr. and Mrs. Astley, — (Thomas, Hannah, and Edmund C.) — and deliverc d live Lectures. 1 then went to Marsliiill (12 miles East), where 1 deliv- ered a Course of seven Lectures ; and to N. Mar- shall, where I delivered two; this was the home of Jacob King, the President of the Association ; — four miles from the village. I then returned to Battle Creek, Nov. 6th, and next day left for Albion, where I delivered eight Lectures on the Doctrine of the Lord, Bedemption, Divine attributes, the Second Coming, Last Judgment, Blood of Christ, and Hea- ven and Hell. The first Lecture was on Sunday evening at the Presbvterian Church ; and the others at the School House ; and although the nights were dark and disagreeable, I had a very good and atten- tive congregation. i left Albion on Saturday morning, Nov. 18th,, LECTURES AT JACKSON. 89 through roads almost impassable, I arrived at Jack- son the same evening, and on the following evening (Sunday),! delivered a Lecture at the Court House, on the Language f the Sacred Scriptures ; pre- paratory to the Course I intended to commence on the Creation of the Universe, and the lirst chapters of Genesis. These Lectures were mostly given at Porter's Hall, which had been previously engaged for that purpose by Mr. Thielson, (who was then living in Jackson. The audiences were large and respectable, increasing in number, every evening, and were the general topic of conversation. The Presbyterian, Congregational, Baptist, and Metho- dist IMinisters attending some of them. But these latter did not like them, and they did all they could to keep peojile away. On one occasion, at the close of a Lecture, the Presbyterian Minister asked leave to propose a few questions, which was readily granted ; but instead of doing so, he turned himself to the audience and commenced declaiming against what I had said. I made but a brief reply to this but reminded him that he had asked permission to make a few inquiries of me, which he had not done : but which he was then invited to do, but he had no questions to ask. I afterwards learned that the Methodist Minister, who sat beside him, had urged him to do this ; being unwilling to do it himself. Not so however with the Congregationalist Minister, — he needed no one to urge him, his own zeal being sufficient for him, and this he manifested in much loud tongue-work and acrimonious declamation. Again and again would he speak, being as he j (i i i 90 REPULSE AT JACKSON thought fully armed for the contest ; his weapons being drawn from the armory of the Rev. J. G. Pike's uncrupulous attack on the Doctrines of the New Church which was puhlishcd in England more than twenty years hefore, entitled " Swedenborg- ianism depicted in its true colors" ; although a full and most copious refutation of its false and distorted statements had very soon after been published by Rev. Robt. Hindmarsh; but that was not heeded. So Swedenborg was denounced as insane and as a blasphemer; and this was the way my Lectures were refuted! Again did the dragon seem to be in the act of expelling water from its mouth as a flood, to destroy the man child as soon as it was born, — and when this was not sufficiently effectual, they induced Mr. Porter to withdraw from the agree- ment he had made with us for the use of his Hall ; which he did in the following laconic note, addressed thus: "Mr. Thielson. You cannot have the use of my Hall any longer for your lectures. Respectfully yours, B. Porttr. Sabbath evening, Nov. 26th, 184B." Rev. Mr. Chichester, (Presbyterian), and Rev. Mr. Harrison, (Baptist), made speeches in opposition to the Lectures. The above note was received by Mr. T., as appears upon its face, on Sunday evening, just before I commerced deliver- ing my eighth Lecture, at the Court House, which had been engaged for this evening, in anticipation of a larger audience than Porter's Hall would ac- comodate ; and it was crowded, over four hundred people being present. At the conclusion of my Lecture I read the note which Mr. Thielson had AND STUONG OPFOSITION 91 received, statin<^ tliat we could not have the Hall for any more Lectures ; and asked the audience what we should do. Thoy at once appointed a Moderator, and a Committee of live persons to secure another room, and make arrangements for me to deliver another course ; wliich I did. This Course was on the Divine attributes, the eTewish Dispensation, — the miracles of Egypt, the standing still of the Sun and Moon, — Redemption, Resurrec- tion, Heaven and Hell, lI-c, in all sixteen. These Lectures were delivered at a School house, — a i)Oor place, and in an inconvenient situation ; but it was the best, indeed the only place, that could be ob- tained. Whilst I was delivering these Lectures every effort was made, that could be made, to destroy their inlluence ; and, as in other places, the columns of the i)ul)lic press were resorted to for that purpose. In the State Gazette an article appeared occu- pying more tiian two columns, headed " Sweden- borgianism," which commenced thus. " We are requested to publish the introduction to a work by J. G. Pike, author of *' Persuasives to early piety," " Guide .for young disciples," &c. It is proposed to publish next week, the entire work in pamphlet form, if siiflicient encouragement is given. The title is 'Swedenborgianism depictedinits truecolors ;' or a contrast between the Holy Scriptures, and the writings of Baron Swedenborg, on a variety of sub- jects. The pamphk't contains some curious extracts from Swedenborg's writings, which it is presumed will not be contained in the Lectures now being delivered in town." And then, after lamenting 92 CONTROVERSY ■i ] K bemg., to .ternit^, ,vi,o n. v '■";;' "' '"'" f""'"^" Not a few „f tl,,„, ^re .Jltn ""'" '" l"'""l'I«- °f."'e al.o„,;natious e!^u- '{ .'«"''™'" »f "mny ;'-"i"gs." TJ,e„ l,e 2! T' !" "'^-'^ l"-opl.efs *eacl,i„„,of Swe.Jbo ' ' %'"/''"^ """ ti^e of Cla-i.stia„it,.,. l.„t"^'t ";,"'"'« various sects MaI.o,net the Bivi" T Lc C'l ""i ^« «'"-' or '^t™. and ^homwesJo, , '. ''■'"""«•" ''''odd "''''-easoise.vaetiv;'^^-;;^^'- question J««>>« Christ, orSwecienCl ■ "' '' "'^' ^-ord ■•^vere, a„d ti,e l'ead^.°T^^''°'-'^''^' «'''«''o='ld ^'''I'^ce ? Tins sl^e'^t L'" ""''™" "'^ ^'-ouW q"^«ti«", and tins is the cor27"''" "f "™ °'' "'^ t^o systems of tl,e Lord T ' "'"• ^"'^ the "'■<■. «« Mill here he^J'T^" ^"^''^■"I'org, oi-l»«od, tinit it is as inn on "' '" '«">"«Weali; ^oih at tl. same il ;':';:: . H """"■" '" «-'» ''o a Christian, and \r 1 ' "" '*'""'' '"»<'. to ""-i a i.eatl,en ■ 1 l,e T""' '' "'^ '■' C)"-t an train of nn-srei,rese,Ua on r "•'"'"'' ""■""«'' » 'ong IN THK NEWSPaPHRS. 98 .S Jin personal '' «fiys he 1(1 III <'*'.(. «*'s no "'« A'iJ,)\v- ^^^iplvH of "' '>ut the ' Vituihle. of many ^^■fJpJiet's ^ii-dt the tmo kind »iis sects Jiiestion 1 exactly between ^sion of irist or should i^iestion * Lord should iJioiiJd >i' the )r the borg, CaJJy ihein e, to ti an 'ong eet- veu fitatinp; what I had said, hut ignorantly dechiiming and denouncing wliat ho supijoscd to be, and de- clared was, the teaching of Swedenl)org. Tims tliey sought to create an alarm, and doubtless to a very considerable extent succeeded in doing so. However tlu^y did not meet with success sullicient to warrant their re-publication of Pike's pani[)hU!t. In the next week's (rdzcttc, the following I'eply, from me, was inserted, hearing date Dec. 7th, 1843. — " Sir, I have just seen your paper of the 30th ult., in which appears a lengthy article, fur- nished by an anonymous correspondeut, headed 'Swcdenborgianism.' That communication would not rei^uire any answer but for certain parts, which are recorded as facU, and unless noticed, might leave an impression with some, that they really were so. I have, during the last two weeks been engaged in delivering a series of Lectures on the Creation, Deluge. Langn:i;^o of Scripture, and other subjects interesting to our common widfare. These Lectures appear to have given offence to some persons, who, being desirous of nullifying any influence it may be supposed thtiy might have, in leading to a deeper investigation of these important subjects, a correspondent has favored you, and the public generally, with the communication al)Ove referred to. Instead of controverting, or disprov- ing any of the positions, facts, deductions, kc, advanced by me, the object is to prove that iMuanuel Swedenborg was a madman, or an impostor ! If the latter assumption were fully sustained, in what manr.er, I would inrpiir?, would it affect the posi- 9i pike's attack, tions taken by mo «' P'on^h I freely anaZj°' ^ """ "' """» ? ■jo Measure of present^. „ , " ""^^« ^''"vo had I'mve in every iustane "J^^^ ''om,a„„it^, yet own merits, and the testinrvoT/'''^'" "" "'^'^ wason, philosophy, and „" Z . ''^' '""l"'"-''. 7"» W these al-o tr 11 " ^"'"'""'^ S^e^l'y of .Swedenborg is an 1^ , tr"''';'" '"'''"''^^ «ay be proper to say a few wo'/' '''''''• ^«' '* tljo re,nar,.rnade „pL .sTedl j" "'•^'"«''- '» ihepamphletrefcrre,! t^ 1 °' ontitled -Svvedenbor", i,J-V^'".'r"™«Po»''<'nt. colors, was published a 2 vl """"'' ''" "^ '"'" ^y the liev. J. G. Pike^i J,r': "'" '" ^"«'-". Poso to that in wbiea it is „„? ' " """'"• l'"" P»l'«-. An answer wa soon ' r^'"'^'' « >'ow published by the Key T If f '"■''"''■^'' »"<! 'A Vindication of the 1 ^^'"'''""^h. entitled of the Hon. E„,an, el "^'T"'"' ""'' ^^'i'-s i'^ko of J)erby,. 4e.' If "ot ^ "" ''^"- '^^ «• pondent is desirous thaf » T°".>'""'»» eorres- ^"l-ject shoul.1 be jrose'L • * "'""' "" ""« before the connnunit; "t^j" ' ':",''"'"<' ^o™ P^sent both »ides of « e " 'e, T v """» «o object, I will fu,„i,i, ^.^'^ And ,f this be his marsh's answer for that " '"'^•>' "f Hind- AND HINDMAUII S REPLY. 9& ^^ quoted ^^ thinn ? my in. ^in,V(; had ^^^ty, yot on their cnpture, norally ; insanity i'etit ence to ondent, ^^ trim i^'land, "• pur- 1 your >tl and ititJed 'Itinga *t tlio J. G. )rres- tiiis form U' to J his ind- 31*0- )er- bas )ns contained in our prophtt's writings.' Wo have had many Huch friends, who in a similar manner have warned us of our dan<;er, so that wc* may he said to be witliout excuse in this matter. J3ut it has uniformly happened that the very persons, who have thus alfectod to pity us, and warn us, had no proper knowledge of the matter themselves; nay, did not know so much about it as those they cau- tioned ! This has in every inst. nee been proved. We shall always take it kindly, if any i)erson, knowing at least as much on the subject as wo do ourselves, will shew us where we are in error. Now in reference to your present communication, your cor- respondent calls Swedeiiborg a ' Prophet ^^ we do not regard him as such. He savs there is as much dilfer- ence between ' Swedcnborgianism and Christianity as there is between Iiilidelity and Christianity ; and that it is no more possible to believe in the writings of Swcdenborg and tlu; Scriptures than at the same time to l)e both Christian and Heathen.* It may not be easy to designate assertions like these ; they try our patience somewhat ; but they ave more painful than true. The best way is. to lei Swedenborg's own writings answer for themselves ; those that really desire to know the truth, will here find the best way of discovering it. We believe that Swedcnborg has presented the only real anti- dote to infidelity and one wdiich I think the infidel will not attempt to controvert, although it demol- ishes every argument he has used against the Scriptures. If we are at issue with other denomi- nations of the Christian world, we will not appeal i! 96 noble's argument I- 'I «-ptures them ,;; , f, "'*"",":>■• ''"' *« "'e ''■•>e, does it signifvwht.the. ^ . , ^"'■''^'''O'-g be -*'' "'« B,in-t;u i:^^ ^ ,': Mrr""''"-'"''" Wi..y so sonit'o :i'' , 7; tr ?"'• "^'"""-'^ ^ .A'fe<^C/„./.Y„.' ])oc,t, ° """'"'«'•« '"'^'e been were imposters, i.rove tl,., « f ', ^*™"'«s, Ac, well migl.t it l,e . rC U aTl ^'"""^'"1'°'- "'a. ? As J3rabe, and otiK^/taf, ;,?'"' '°'""^-' 'i^''" fore Copo..„ie„.s and ;;:;;:; ^^T'^y' "-re- sortion of |,ei„g ^ < Tea,.I„... ' , ''" ™''™ a^- /"'•'> evidence ti,at such a LT ■"'" '^'"'' ^"•'■"- condition;. In re j/ „ ' ''" "''^'"'"''^ '"«n.y .years aRo, in he % T v ' "'""°«^ '°«de, ^"^ the I,ev. g' Cui :l^r.t' '''«""^''' taet..,l u-on, his 'Ann;u ;„?'';, .'" ^"="1«". ex- 'I7;'en,al world, a,;r::.t''''.'^:"'7-»-f an-itlie more recent ones P ! '" ''™1'''<"' "'ent:-.Ma|,omet was a f ^ ° T'"'"' '''■«"■ Keeve and JfuK-leton « ? l'™l''«^'.-«o were ""Other. ii„t°rs .;".';'■'■':" ^--'-borg was f-e of y„„,. ,,,;:: ;,;;;'-;»a.e„s see the -pectsSwe.,enborgr;^™bKu:;at^^^^^^^^^ WITH AN OPPONENT. 97 to the refuse * Every one vho professes to have received a Di- vine commission is insane ; Mahomet, Muggletou, all che apostles and prophets, with Swedenborg, did this ; therefore Mahomet, Muggleton, all the apostles and prophets, with Swedenborg, were insane ! But, Sir, you should have known, that neither Mahomet, nor Muggleton have been ranked as false prophets, simply because they pretended to Divine revelations ; but because their pretended revelations contained nothing worthy of the source to which they ascribed them. That Mahomet's system is in every respect diametrically opposite to Holy writ, is well known. Nor will the parallel you would institute between Swedenborg, and Reeve and Muggleton, hold in any other way, than in the way of contrast. More disgusting stulf cannot be conceived than tills the pages of those ignorant drivellers ; yet, though nothing bordering on such rubbish is to be found in the writings of Sweden- borg, you are not ashamed to represent him, (and this you affirm seriously,) as treading exactly in the steps of Reeve and Muggleton : not abating an atom of their fanaticism and delusion ! And yet you profess yourself ready to abide by my appeal to his works ! Read them lirst. Sir, and learn what they are. At least, read some one of them straight through, giving a candid attention to every part of its contents ; not looking only for such things as may be distorted into subjects of ridicule, as infidels have treated the Bible. P. 200, 2nd Eng. Ed. "Who among our adversaries will accuse Paul of o bi\ iji m f ^; Til I « I ^i I 98 WHAT WESLEY SAID. insanity for speaking of the * abundance of his re- velations !' Or John, for being * in the Si^irit,' and seeing, and hearing, the wonderful things recorded in his ' Revelations !' Or Zechariah, or Ezekiel, and others? — Has Luther been accused of insanity, because of his recorded conference with the devil ? Or Wesley, — Mrs. Fletcher, or others, who have, in a similar maHner, testified to their views of the Spiritual world ? Did not Wesley himself declare that " We may now burn all our books of theology,- — God has sent us a Teacher from heaven, and in the doctrines of Swedenborg we may learn all that is necessary for us to know /' Some of the most emi- nent of Wesley's preachers, as well as Clergymen from the Church of England, and from other De- nominations, became receivers, and preachers of Swedenborg's doctrines ; and although Wesley afterwards circulated the report of Swedenborg's insanity, he did it, not on any knowledge of his own, but * on the authority of a Mr. Brockmer, as well as of Mathesius ; — this however was only be- cause Mathesius told him, (Wesley), that he derived his information from Brockmer ; but this, Brockmer totally denied'. And it was nearly forty years after- wards that Mathesius 'fabricated the tale with which he imposed on Mr. Wesley.' And more re- markable still, the very man, (Mathesius) who pro- pagated the story of Swedenborg's insanity, died himself a lunatic! It will easily be seen that the frieuds of Swedenborg have not, and do not allow, that ho ever called himself the 'Messiah,' or any of the ridiculous stories propagated respecting HISTORY REPEATED. 99 him, — they are all false. Want of room prevents my saying more ; hut if any persons wish to state all the facts of the case to the puhlic, I can assist them with many documents which may be necessary, "I am, very respectfully yours. George Field." There was no reply made to this letter, or any further notice taken of it ; nor was the pamphlet of Pike's republished, as i)roposed. But instead of an active opposition, we experienced a jKtssirc one. I visited Jackson several times after this ; but always found a difficulty in obtaining any suitable place to Lecture or preach in. The school room, before referred to, being almost the only place that could be had ; and this was very unsuitable, but when we used it, it was well filled. Before I left Jackson, arrangements were made for obtaining the necessary Books for the establishment of a New Church Library in the village. It will be seen from this that no inconsiderable impression was made upon the minds of the people here, in regard to the Doctrines of the New Church ; still the opposition was but a repetition of what had occurred at Goshen, Jacksonville, and other places ; and it was the same feeling of hostility and prejudice as Paul encounter- ed among the Jews and heathen at Tliessalonica, Athens, and other places, where they said, " These that have turned the world upside down, are come hither also." But as I had other work to do, I now left Jackson ; and on Monday, December, 4th, I found myself at Lima, a cross-road settlement, a few miles distant, where a Naw Ciiurchman by the name of Harford lived. m m 1 ' 'f ^ 1* n It • 1= \'\ • 1 ,i 100 RETURN TO DETROIT. I delivered a Lecture there, that evening at the school house, to a small audience ; and next day went on to Ann Arbor, where I made a very brief stay ; but loft 18 volumes of New Church Books with Mr. George Corselius, (a N. C, brother, and Editor of one of the village papers), for him to have presented to the Library of the Ann Arbor Uni- versity. On the 6th of December, (1843,) I arrived at Detroit, and, by invitation, made my abode with Mr. and Mrs. Josiah Dorr, of whom mention has been made before. They then lived in Springwells, on the Detroit river, about a mile from the city. I gave an introductory Lecture to my proposed Course, at the City Ilatl, on the 9tli (Saturday), and on Sunday, one on the Doctrine of the Lord. But on account of the Court being then in session, I could not obtain the use of the Hall again till the 18tli. It will be remembered that the Society which ' was instituted in this City by Eev. Holland Weeks, in August, 1889, — was by August 1842 entirely dispersed and scattered; not one of the original number remaining. Mrs. Dorr, however, still lived there ; but she had never, as before stated, joined the Society ; preferring to retain her membership in the Boston Society. But there were a few other persons, who had since come to reside there, mem- bers of the Church, at the time of my present visit, viz., Mrs. Ably Paisseil, to whom I have before re- ferred as a sister of Samuel Woodworth, then of New York, (author of the "Old Oaken Bucket,") Mr. MEETINO AT BATTLE CREEK. 101 ig at the next day ery brief li Books ;^ier, and a to Lave ^or Uni- I'ived at xle with tion has ngwelJs, 3 city. I'oposed turday), e Lord, session, till the which Weeks, ntirely I'iginal 1 lived joined 31'Sllip other niein- visit, :e re- in of ) Mr. and Mrs. Samuel Hall ; and Mr. and Mrs. Herrick, who had just removed there, from Boston. — When I again had the use of the City Haii, I delivered six other Lectures of the Course on the Creation, &c., this was up to Saturday the 23rd. On Sunday afternoon and evening, (the day before Christmas), I delivered a Lecture there on Human Kedemption; and on Heaven and Holl, and on Christmas day, — on the nature of Miracles; but could not conclude the Course the next evening, on account of the Hall being engaged ; nor did I ever deliver that last Lecture, as I was obliged to leave the city, to be in time to attend the next meeting of the Mich- igan and Northern Indiana Association, which was to assemble at Battle Creek, on Wednesday, January 3rd, 1844. After the close of the last lecture which I did give there at that time, a well-known gentleman residing in the city (Mr. Brush") came to me and enquired if I would accept a small purse of money, which several of those who had attended the lec- tures, would like to present to me, as a token of acknowledgement of the [)leasure and gratification they had received from the lectures, and upon ex- pressing my willingness, I was to receive it at the close of the next lecture, (the last of the Course), which lecture, as I have stated, 1 did not deliver, nor did I receive the " token " which was to follow it ! Before I left Detroit a proposal was made to me by Messrs. Dorr, Hall and Herrick, to make that city my home, teach school, preach, and )>uild up a society there. As an inducement to do so, j;' !.. 102 Hall, a hundred doJia s ,td m"""'" ''"'■ *^^- «wo doJJarB; for which iCl f '^ ,^/"'«t. «>%■ on Sundays, using „,„ schnM "'■'""' P^acb as additional pupils wn„^! '"'' "' '"""I* more deliberation Uc'eeptlrt e'"/ "V ^"^ "«» "-' »»''" as suitable arranit'-' ?°'"'»«"ce as carrying it out. On WeT . """''' '''^ ""ade for I i«ft Detroit for Batt I (tlf^ "'""'"S. ^ec. 27' annual meeting of the Lt w ° """"'' ""« second ^''y at Ann Irbo at S"' ''"''^'"^ »" 'J-' Jackson in tin^e to delTver tZ^ '"" """"-i at ^-owe on Sunday. TheT »ft "' "' "'« ^ourt «'ay at Albion, on Tuesd^'pf', """'■"/ « short Creei, and made n,v T "^-"-.I arrived at Battle Wi^aton during LZ ^'"^' ^'"' M''- and Mr " O'clock on Wetaf ™^^ -J-™ there S ^«^^. tl- Associates ir;; '"§ -^""-^ M ^oom, 25 being preset V r^"''^-^'^ ^'''ool- P«side„tbeingl~,r-^'i- '""'"' ^'"8- ">« «'>at a meeting should b hi,! 7 " ^™^ ^^^"'^^d, °" «'at and the following!! '"•■ P"""'" «<»-Bhip Sacrament of Bapti Hfou dT'^ """ '''■•" '''^ «-« e'ose of the service tlit '"'.™">'^'»ed at Holy Supper be adm inl* . '"''"'"S ' and the afternoon "at a p Se n!^' °" "'^ ^""owing -^ M-r;- :i - ^e:;- anrrS ---.ofSpiSt-,--r.r.Oe^^^^ TO JOIN GENERAL CONVENTION. 103 e mington, Oakland Co., John Harford, of Lima, Washtenaw Co., M. H. Rollin of Goshen, Ind. ; J. Y. Scammon, of Chicago, 111. ; Edwin Burnham, of Henderson, Jefferson Co., N. Y. : and also a letter from Prof. Whiting, of the Ann Arbor Uni- versity, in acknowledgement of the receipt of the donation of books from the General Convention. A communication was received from the Illinois Association on the subject of representation in the Western Convention, which, after considerable discussion, terminated in the adoption of a Resolu- tion for the Association to apply for admission into the General Convention; and Mr. Hans Thielson and myself were elected as delegates to represent it at its next session. The use of the Presbyterian Church having been granted for our evening meetings, we met there at seven o'clock, when in accordance with a previous resolution, I delivered a discourse from Mark xvi., 16 : *' He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved ; but ho that believeth not, shall be condemned." After which the following adults came forward and were baptized, viz ; — Abiel Silver, and Mrs. Ednah H. Silver (his wife). Hans Thielson — Henry N. Thielson, — Charles Hinkle, and Edwin Perry. And two children brought by their respective parents, viz: Ednah C. Silver, and Harriet E. Murray. This service was felt to l)e most impres- sive and affecting. On the following afternoon, at the house of Mr. W. G. Wheaton, the Holy Supper was administered to twelve communicants. During the session of :?^. ^41 ; I J lOi NEW ARRANGEMENTS. '•««3ons, I felt oblJt!,' "' ^"'" ''^ f«'- «"'er Missiona,,. labors .^^f, 1',;:"';".""' '^' '"«»'»' »"y permanent l,o n -tr '" '""''^' "«''-°it «« a» annual one, to hi l/e ' r^ ""'"'«-^' '''^ ^'«I1 '" "'e Association; an ,' ,"^"""" '"^''^^ 'vith- ™ontl, eao), wint,,/.: "''"' ^ ^^»"''" devote one ^a» approved .f?''"-^' '"'""•• ^'''- l"'"" «- Phee for the ne . „ i:," "''':."""' "f"'' "s son for the first „uartc,- v '"""''"S; an.l Jack- ^ -.ning anoC :,::':"'"• "" "'^ ■^'""- I'^sbyterian Chnrcl, to T "' ^''"""'"'^ '" tha dience. ""' '" <* '"•■«« and attentive au- -WM t;i';scf " "r' "■« ^"""-' -». J'^ar, was $115,,; "•' ""^^ ''"'■'"« tl'e con,ing Herrick,-He„r,, WeL ;'"; ^.^'•- •^''''» I«aac Newn,an,-.Jabjl"::^::7"'-;„^-'7.-Wi„iam Home,— Jx V T r.i Valni,— L. M TJ'omas Welle;. VH"Ar'"'~'^"""«' I'-'''-.- don Millerd,-Jrr .n 1 \r "T '"'"'' ^"''".-Cory. Mi- Ann Parke 'an .blrt' P' '''"«'''™'' »"d were reported as I eld rs a'd T ""''"" '^^^-"^ 'nnes, within the limts of ,/"'""'*''« ^^»«- "eeting was alto.ethrr 1 ! ^^''""'ation. The LECTURES AT ANN ARBOR. 105 ^sequence ^^I'cii the i'or other ' JMroit '^^■»g tile '^ tiiat I ^es with- '^^0 one i'""^ Vhn 'i'f>n as i -fact, '^'^iurs- in the ve au- it sub- 3ming Isaac 'iiam M. ory. and ons 'oc- ^he nd 3d. After leaving Battle Creek I went to Marshall, where I delivered a lecture at the Court House to a f^ood and attentive audience. From Marshall I went to Albion, where I delivered a Course of seven or eight Lectures, which were very well attended. I also delivered one lecture at Smithfield. I next went to Ann Arbor, by way of Lima, Dexter, and Jackson. In this village (Ann Arbor), I de- livered a full Course of Lectures to large and attentive audiences. There, almost everything yielded to the popular movement, which was to go and hear the Lectures. The Court lloase, at which I delivered them, had been previously en- gaged by a Methodist ^Finister for tliree evenings of the week ; so on those evenings I was allowed the use of the basement of the Methodist Church ; a very ineligible place; but as tliis gentleman could not obtain an audience on the evenings I was lec- turing, he dismissed his own meeting, and came to hear me ; and at my la^t Lecture expressed a de- sire to ask me some questions, which was readily granted : but his object seemed to be rather to ridiculo than to entpiire ; and at this he had very poor success, — the feelings of the audience were against him ; and he retired discoinlitcd. 1 soon after preached several times at Ann Arbor, and always to large and attentive audiences. A New Church Library Society was started there, similar to the one in Goshen. During my stay in Ann Arbor, I made my home with Mrs. C. Bawson (now Mrs. Levanway), and on the 20th of Jan., 1844, again started on my journey, leaving my illl i : II :| ii 1 ■): 1 1 i 1 f ' 1 106 "SITED MR. mMARB. "«' point was Davton m, 7"^ '" ^"'''oi'- My *h-e I thought iTo M a,: i '"".''^^<'" '^-S ^«'d on hia far™, i„ L„ca, Co ^^;^'°«'- Hib much out of my way bTl ?. ' "' '' ''""''^ "ot be I had to spend thfittV™'." "'--»<'»' "<»". in which there "wL" th.' '""'^ "' <"■« trundle-beds, and over TZ , ''"''' ''««''<Je» '>«" •' Then, soon afTer th '"'""^ »"<* "'"l- <"■ «'« road, sick wth CO '."i^'"'"^ '"^ -Jown another night; hut finallv f'f, "^"'"'"'^ ■»« ,^«etmg and spendingoi . "" l''^''^''™ of ,»^f •/• B. Hibbard L tl?'" ^'■"' *^^- """l 'f » Dayton, „■„ Maumeepiri '''™- '^''^' ' B'ac ic Swamp, which, ho" el/ ^""""S''' »"<' the «f aJiUs terrors and eventfuli. T ""' ''^P"^«<i "macadamised road was made t?'' "^ " S""" « sl.ort cali on Mr. Gwynn, It r,"""'', "^ ^ «'"'« John JIm,,o,j, SimWfi ;. '"'"''"^'""'IMr. ^^b. 6th, (1844) ZTf: '"■"^"'« ™ Dayton a^.V home with my steeiT;" ""''^ "^ '^"Por- I preached at the AfpHf"'^'''™''"" ("'e llth) fl-ctable audience an 'I 1- ^!i""'' '" " ^-^ "e. ^^« Dayton the next morn '"' '''" "'"W''^" I ^""sday evenings ;te,rd"';!r'°" M°"day and Springfield. Here It, t " "'« ^«'"-' House in ;!«h A-in,,ly cxcha^g^d "1'""= ^'^''' ^^- M". ---outfu'rstShr-!^^^^ COMMENCE IN DETBOIT. 107 Af bor, till I etroit. My efore going 'Other Hib- o"^d not be the woods, Jse of one 8, besides and cbi]. ^^y down ained me 'easure of Mf. and • 31st), I ' and the deprived s a good J made and Mr. Dajton, 'empor- id Mrs. 'llth), ery re- en. I ^jand use in Mur- !o, on a bus, 3U8e. went to Detroit ; arriving at Mr. Dorr's on the 23rd of February, with a view of making that City my home, in accordance with previous arrangements. On the 1st of March (1844,) I rented, and took possession of a room, to be jointly occupied as a School room during the week, and for a Church on the Sabbath. It was not a very attractive place, being a back room, up one flight of stairs on Jefferson Avenue nearly opposite to the Michigan Exchange ; (then numbered 53). At this time this was about the outskirts of that part of tlie City, and but little business was done there. On the 14tli day of the same month I commenced teaching ; and on the 27th commenced the re-delivery of my Course of Lectures on the Creation, &c., at the City Hall. This was done at the especial request of one of the citizens, who wished them to be free, and volun- teered to pay all the expenses himself. On the 27th of April I went to Jackson to attend the first Quarterly meeting of the Association. As this was not a business meeting; but de- signed expressly for ttie religious and social inter- course of such as resided in that region of country, a large meeting was not expected. It may however be interesting to put on record the names of some of those who attended — which, as well as can now be ascertained, were Mr. J. I. Herrick, Mr. Hans Thielson, Henry N. Thielson, D. J. Holden, Jabez Fox, C. Hinkle, and Howe, Hasbrook Calender* Perry, Millerd, R. H. Murray, wife, and children, Mrs. Eawson, Mrs. McClara, Mrs. Mann, Mrs. ^*j 4-41 108 MKETINO AT JACK80K. Johnson, and myaelf On M,„t April 27tl., 18441 I ,,,,i<'™""'8. (Saturday m the afternoon administered t'^frTT" = """ ten communicants,, an.l deli", 'a w"''!'"'" '° evening. After the service ZV ,"" '" "'« Mr. Corjdon Jfillerd ,7„e » '"*■' "'""'"S- The Secretary, in irl ' p"'"' ^~ ''■■'I'"''ed. meeting, say.s, '' A Z"'tZ "?""'" "^ """ i« ''"I'e.!. ..rofitalile e ,t o 7 '"""""'"' ""'' « -•-tod '.y.,.arati:nr; j;::::''-''"^^- '^'■ ■"emlicr., parted however witH J T ■'""• ^'"' Pation of again meetin. \nl"l"^T"'" """«'- larger number of tlieir hZ "''"' '"""' «'"' a fellow citizens of N 1 "" '"i "'" ^'"-''' ""d Quarterly meetin. va7r,.f !,"'"•" '^''"^ '"^^ Ann Arbor. On «,e 8tb " 7r '' *" ^" ''«''' at Course of Leetureson he /'^.' ™"'='"''«' ""y Hall ; and on tiie „W * ^^"'^ ^^ ."- CitJ mence,! a Course of I ,. .7 '*' "'"'"'"S eom- «'« «'"eh at :; Lt:'~j::,:,.^''-''- <>' tinned every Sunday eveninlti'l. « *■■'''' """■ June; when I left Detro t t » 1 ''"' ^''<^'''' « Convention of the New cLnO ,'"'/'" «''"<'™' held in New York wbel r , 1 ' '™' '» ''« June, 1844. The;c 1 'Tbe' "' "" "'" '^'l' "f »tate and l^-os^cts o ' l' ch^r '' ™r '" '''^ «mce I left it i„ October 1838 "uM'; ■""" ^"^' intend to speak of nor ^f « . "' "'" ^ ''« not -ntion. B'ut on ,:; '^Tf 1 "" ««"■ •nvitation to Henderson fn T„T ' ^ '"'"'• ">? •naice a little Missioi:" ^^iShT ''"; ^^ ^- '" y visit in that neighborhood. (Saturday "" at the . ... and P^i^per to ^"*' in the «f tljfs «ind it ^vas ter- ^^- The A' 'intici- 'i witj, a *'c^i, and '^^G next ^Jei(i at fi(3d my 'ie City Coin- in es of 'e con- oefc in ^neral to be th of 1 the ^Jty, not 'on- , to 5d. SAUBATII WORSHIP IN DETUOIT. 109 I was very kindly received and entertained by my esteemed friends Mr. and Mrs. Kdwin Burnham, who then resided there. On Saturday evening, June the 22nd, I delivered a Lecture at the School House, and on Sunday morning and afternoon, preached at the Universalist Church there ; and in the evening, at Sniithville, (five miles distant), then the home of Dr. Seymour ; many ])erbons coming from within a range of eight miles tonttend. Next evening I lectured at Smithville again, at the Union Church. I also visited Sackett's Harbor, then the residence of Mr. Dyer Jiurnham, and delivered two Lectures there, in the Methodist Church ; and at the close of the second Lecture, started again on my way to Detroit, where I arrived on the 30th. On Wednesday, July 3rd, I again left ]^etroit to go and see my two little boys at Battle Creek; and on my way back stopped at Ann Arbor, to attend the Quarterly meeting which was to be held there. On the Sunday 1 preached twice there, in Hawkin's Saloon, and had a Social meeting in the afternoon. I have no further account of this meeting, but think there were not many present. On returning to Detroit we com- menced, for the first time, holding meetings for worshi[) on Sunday mornin;/, July 14th, 1(3-14, at my School room ; (previously we had met at Mr. Samuel Hall's house). At that first morning, there were present 15 adults, and children. These meetings were now continued regularly every Sun- day morning with an average attendance of 20 persons. '< I 110 REVISIT 008F2N. In August I mar?A o son to comp fn n * ^'"^^^g^ements for m.r Tfent by private coavev.Z ^ "' ""'^ "«' day fore on Saturday, tIT 28, °''""'' ""^'"g "''-nge that had tat.pjf ,' 'l ''^'>, ^nch was thf ttat n,eniorabie Lecture on S r'?"^ ^ ''"liyered ^'3cuss,on with Mr. Cook « ?t''"'"'^8' ''«^r my permuted ,0 „,e the Met .'odtl Jh "'^ ""'' "«"« i de vered a Sermon the dav „f °'' ' '° '^''''eh Si "rr -" "Si /r^'^r'' r "■'' l,„tl. ^^' *'^'' Pi-eached in . "^xt day t-otli morning and eveni^„1. " '*"" Cimrch fo'-vering , Sermon "ri;,;;- "'^ ""'«'"«. after tutirr" ""-""*" ir' "^ "- ^"-i'' J i^ieasant and ffraf if v« -^niswas »»'y Pl<'asa„t to know ?ff ■':« "^^''"S.- " was nu fat ullage who could t'^^ '""" '" "'any in J;"-! and Saviour Je „^ ^t' ""''""^vledge ^he 2^'^^!-man^arth,a deSlr "" ""'■'• «»d FAVORABLE CHANGES. Ill Society for His worship ; but also to know that the general sentiment of the place was so favorable and friendly to the New Church. Only one year before, when application had been made for the use of the Presbyterian Church, we were re- fused, with the remark, that "If Mr. Field waj to use that pulpit, they did not believe that Mr. Broughton (their Minister), would ever go into it again; he would not stay with us !" But at this time, both Presbyterians and Methodists invited us to use their pulpits, and the only reason why we did not use the Presbyterian, was, because their building was not large enough. Pre- vious to my going to Goshen this time, there had been some question about the need, or the propriety of those who had been previously baptized into the Old Church, being again baptized into the faith of the New, but my Sermon on the subject on Sunday morning, seemed to produce general conviction. One •old lady of 70 years, who had been a member of the Ei)iscopal Church all her life, voluntarily came for- ward to make this her public acknowledgement of her reception of the Doctrines of the New Church, according to the form and mode of the Lord's appointment. Another, an old gentleman of 60, the President of our Association, and who had for years before been a member of a New ■Church Society in the state of New York with- out having been l)aptized ; now, seeing and feeling its importanet' and propriety, though his natural feelings rebelled again.st it ; did not come forward with the otliers, but retired, went to his p 1 m ': 1 iLl' ;r>H 1 mm i: % t 112 AT DETROIT AGAIN. i I I room ; and took the fever and ague ! but sent for me after dinner to Baptize him, as he lay in bed; which I did. Two others held back a little longer, but next day, asked me to baptize them before I left, which I also did. Whilst I was in Goshen, Eev. H. N. Strong, who had been residing in Ohio, having heard of the prospects of the New Church in this village came over with a view of making his home here, and preaching to the Society ; and arrangements were soon effected for his doing so ; and a school prepared for him to tear*.h. His family came soon afterwards. On the 30th I left Goshen in company with Mr. Jacob King, M>. and Mrs. Silver, and Mrs. W. Evans, and went to Edwards- burg, calling on Dr. Biardsley, at Elkhart on the way. I preached at Edwardsburg the same even- ing, and next morning proceeded on my way home, calling on Mr. Murra>-, who was then living at Kalamazoo. Made a short stay at Battle Creek ; went to Marshall, and preached there at the Court house on Friday evening, October 4th; and next evening preached in Ho,wkins' saloon, at Ann Arbor, and on the following afternoon and evening (being Sunday), at the Court House ; on which occasion I baptized three Adults, viz., Mr. George Corselius, Mrs. Charlotte Rawson, and Mrs. Evelina Rawson ; and two children, viz., Edward and Charlotte Bawson. I also learned that since I was last there a New Church Library had been established. On Monday I reached home, and the next morning re- commenced my school ; and on the following Sunday resumed our meetings for worship, in my school ASSOCIATION MET THERE. 118 room, at which there were as many as 30 in attendance. The third annual meeting of the Association was held in Detroit, commencing Fri- day morning, January 3rd, 1845. There were persons in attendance from Ann Arbor, Farming- ton, Oxford, Springfield, Pontiac, N. Marshall, Kalamazoo, and Detroit. The meeting was quite pleasant : On the Friday and Saturday evenings I delivered Lectures at the City Hall; and on Sunday morning, at my School room. A social meeting was held at the house of Mr. Dorr, and the Lord's Supper administered to 14 persons. Three adults, and two children were also baptized. On Sunday evening I lectured again at the City Hall on the New Jerusalem. I remained in Detroit, preaching every Sunday, at my School room, till Saturday, April 5tli, when I went to Ann Arbor to attend the quarterly meeting of the Association; on which occasion I administered the Holy Supper; and on the Saturday evening lectured at the Court house, on the Second Coming of the Lord; on Sunday afternoon and evening, on the Blood of the Lord; On Monday evening, on the Resurrection of man ; and on Tuesday evening, on the Resurrection of the Lord ; On Wednesday evening, on the Interior memory ; On Thursday, on Lot's wife, and on Fri- day evening, on the Lord's hungering and thirsting. On Saturday, returned to Detroit. On the 27th of April I resumed my Sunday evening Lectures at my Scliool-room, which were very well attended ; and on the 2nd of June, left Detroit for Boston, to attend the meeting of the General Convention,which < 1 TIM 114 REVISIT HENDERSON. place I reached in five days! But of this I shall Bay nothing, nor of my visit to the Brooke Farm phalanx, or my introduction to the celebrities there; as all this would be foreign to my purpose; nor of my pleasant visit to New York city ; nor any of my adventures until I again arrived at Henderson, the home of our brother in the Church, Edwin Burnham, and at Smithville, — where I, by previous arrange- ment was to deliver my Course of Lectures on the Creation, &c., which, however, was preceded by my preaching on Sunday morning, (June 29th), at the Universalist Church at Henderson. On Sunday evening I gave my introductory Lecture at the Union Church. Many persons came from a distance of several miles round to attend these Lectures ; and it is no exaggeration to say that they produced a very decided sensation in that vicinity, and notwithstanding the weather being very unfavourable — raining much of the time — the house was not only full, but often crowd- ed. Elder Sawyer appeared to be very much ex- cited, and denounced the whole system, pronounc- ing it to be demoralizing and infidel ! And at the conclusion of my Course delivered a lecture in opposition, to a large audience ; he said that he had never before heard so great a perversion of the truth in so short a time ; and if he did not shew it, it was because he could not. The next evening I replied to all Mr. Sawyer's objections, to a large and attentive audience, after which Mr. S. said he did not wish for any more discussion ; but would like to know when we intended having a meeting sackett's harbor, etc. 115 to receive our new converts, as he did not know but that he might join us himself ! This, of course, he said satirically. During the intermediate even- ings of some of my lectures at Smithville, I went to Henderson, and Sackett's Harbor, and delivered discourses at those places ; also baptized Mr. Edwin Burnham's youngest son (Louis Tafel), and administered the Holy Sup]3er to twelve commu- nicants, at Mr. B.'s house. On Monday, July 9th, I commenced the repetition of the same course, (on the Creation), at the session house of the Presbyterian Church at Sackett's Harbor ; but as I did not lecture there every evening on the inter- mediate ones I went to Smithville, or Henderson, and lectured there. On Sunday I preached in the Methodist Church at Sackett's Harbor in the morn- ing, and in the evening at Smithville. These Lectures were all very well attended, but did not attract so much attention as they had done at Smithville ; some of the officers residing at Sackett's Harbor asked some questions in relation to certain points in the Lectures, which were at once replied to. On Monday, July 21st, I left Sackett's Harbor for Cleveland, Ohio, intenduig to deliver the same Course of Leo.tures in that City. The Methodist Episcopal Church had been engaged for me for that purpose ; and on Monday evening, July 28th, I delivered my Introductory Lecture there. The Church was large, and was about half full. The second and third Lectures I also delivered there; but just before I commenced the third one, one of the Trustees of the Church ! 116 CLEVELAND AND BOCKPORT. informed me that, after that evening, I could not have the use of the Church any more ! So I made this announcement at the close of the Lec- ture, and asked the audience, which was quite large, what I should do. A Chairman was chosen, and a committee at once appointed to provide me another place, and of which they would, as early as possible, give public notice. The Wesleyan Metliodist Church was at once offered me, which though not quite so large, was very convenient, and a very desirable place, and the audience about i&lled it each evening. The Lectures attracted a good deal of attention. I afterward delivered two Lectures on Swedenborg at the Court House. On the two Sundays, during the time I was delivering these Lectures on the week days, I preached at Eockport (4 miles dis- tant), and attended Social meetings there. I re- turned to Detroit August 12, 1845 ; and on the 19th again left for the west on a Missionary tour. De- livered two Lectures at the Court House at Ann Arbor ; made a short stay at Marshall, and at Battle Creek, and proceeded to Kalamazoo, where, on the evening of the 23rd, I Lectured at the Branch University on the necessity of a New Dispensation of Divine Truth ; and the next evening (Sunday), on the Divine Trinity, to a full house. On Monday and Tuesday evenings, I Lectured on the Atonement and liesurrection, to good and attentive audiences. Before leaving Kalamazoo — (on the Sunday after- noon,) I went, in company with Mr. R. H. Murray, with whom I was staying, to the Phalanx, at CASSAPOLIS, ETC. 117 Galesburgh (nine miles distant), where I preachep a Sermon on the Divine Attributes ; but the state of feehng tliere, was so divided, and so unhappy, that I doubt whether there was much interest iu anything beyond knowing how they could extricate themselves from their entanglements. I left Kalamazoo a few hours after delivering my last Lecture there, for Edwardsburg ; and in company with Mr. Silver called on Rev. H. N. Strong, who had removed from Goshen, and was now living here.* August the 28th I left Edwardsburg for Cassapolis, in company with Mr. and Mrs. Abiel Silver, where I was to deliver my Course of Lectures on the Creation and Flood. Whilst there, I was the guest of Mr. Jacob Silver, brother of Abiel. — I de- livered my first Lecture that evening to about a hundred persons, which number increased as the Lecture progressed to 150 and 200. These Lectures were the topic of conversation for a long time ; and I had no few questions to answer respecting some of my positions ; but tlujy were very favorably received. On the Sabbath which occurred during my stay there, I went back to Edwardsburg, and preached there in the mommg at the School house, and in the afternoon at the Presbyterian Church, to a very fair audience : we had a Social meeting in the evening at Mr. Silver's where I had the pleasure of meeting Dr. and Mrs, Beardsley, from Elkhart, Judge Page and wife* • The Edwardsburg Society was instituted in April, 1845 hj Rev. H. N. Strong, on which occasion he baptized eight adults and four children. 118 AT PONTIAC. from Springfield, Ohio, Mr. and Mrs. Jacob Silver of Cassapolis, Mr. and Mrs. Manning, Mrs. Evans, and others. Left Cassapolis, in company with Mr. A. Silver, Sept. 6th, for Edwardsburg ; thence to Kalamazoo, where I preached on Sunday morning and evening, Sept. 7th, at the "Branch," to very fair audiences. On Monday and Tuesday evenings I lectured again in Battle Creek, at the School house, which was well filled. Whilst here I met Mr. and Mrs. Henry Weller. I next went to Marshall, where I delivered a Course of five Lectures at the Session House, on the Spiritual world, besides preaching on Sunday, and returned to Detroit on the 15th. On the 29th, I visited Pontiacand delivered my Course of Lectures there, on the Creation, at the Court House ; these were very well attended, meeting with favor by many, and opposition by others. Mr. Brewster, Editor of the Oakland Gazette, wrote a very long article in review of the Lectures, although he had heard but one, in which he endeavored to sustain. the popular theological opinions by the accommoda- tion of science. To this I felt bound to reply, and shew how untenable such positions were ; this led to the publication of a series of articles between us, which continued for several weeks. On the Sunday which I spent in Pontiac, we held a meeting for worship at the Court House in the morning ; and I deliv- ered a Lecture on the Spiritual world, and life after death in the Universalist Church in the evening. Mr. and Mrs. Perley Hale were boarding at Pontiac. at this time. ^^mmm^'i^mnfmwmm m SOCIETY AT SPRINGFIELD. 119 From Pontiac I went to the town of Springfield, (about 15 miles N.), to attend the Quarterly meet- ing, and Lecture and preach. On Sunday morn- ing (Oct. 12th, 1845) I delivered a Discourse at Petty's School House, on the subject of Baptism ; and in the evening on the Spiritual world at Hurl- burt's School House. After the morning service I baptized 12 adults, and 9 children ; and in the afternoon, at the house of Mr. E. H. Day, admin- istered the Holy Supper to 15 Communicants ; and (the proper application having been made to me,) I instituted a Society of 14 persons. On the following evening I delivered another Discourse at Young's School House ; and next morning returned to Pontiac, and delivered a Lecture there, at the Court House to a very good audience. I then returned to Detroit. Some short time before this Mr. and Mrs. S. Hall, had left Detroit, and gone to the State of New York to live ; and I no longer boarded with Mr. and Mrs. Dorr. On the 2.5th of October, I again started for the West, on a Mis- sionary tour. Lecturing that evening at the Court House, at Ann Arbor, and in the afternoon and evening of the following day (Sunday). The next day was the annual meeting of the Ann Arbor N. C. Library Society, when they bought some addi- tional books. After making short stops at Mar- shall, Battle Creek, Kalamazoo, Edwardsburg, and Elkhart, I proceeded to Goshen, in company with Mr. Silver, arriving there on the 2nd of November, in time to preach there in the evening. The morning of that day (Sunday), Rev. Mr. Kedzie, , 120 ELKHART, ETC. had thought it proper in his sermon, to compare Swedenborg to Mahomet and Joe Smith. My Lecture was given at the Court House in the even- ing to a large audience, on the Interior memory. I continued to Lecture every evening of the week following, and on the Sabbath, at its close, I preached in the morning also. In the afternoon thirty persons were present at the social meeting. Mr. Kedzie delivered several Lectures against the New Church, but I do not think they made much impression. My Lectures were well attended, and the time passed pleasantly, and I hope profitably, nott^ithstanding the opposition of Mr. Kedzie. On Monday I left Goshen, in company with Judge Chamberlin for Elkhart, arriving there in time to Lecture the same evening ; several of our friends from a distance being present. I also Lectured every evening that week, making my home whilst there with Dr. and Mrs. Beardsley. I concluded my Course by preaching on Sunday morning and evening on the blood of Christ. Twenty persons came over from Goshen, (10 miles distant,) to attend the services on the Sabbath. A social meeting was held in the afternoon at Dr. Beards- ley's, which was very pleasant. Rev. H. N. Strong, from Edwardsburg, was also with us. On the 17th, in company with Mr. Strong, I went to Edwards- burg, where I gave seven Lectures, and preached one sermon, but the weather was so inclement most of the time, that the audiences were much smaller than usual. From Edwardsburg I went on the 26th, to MR. BRIANT OPPOSING. 121 Niles, where I delivered four lectures; but the weather was still so stormy, and unfavorable, that they were but slimly attended. On the Sunday I preached in the new Baptist Church, and baptized two adults, and two children. In the meantime my discussion was still going on in the Oakland County^ Gazette, with Mr. Brewster, on the subject of my lectures in Pontiac. And, since leaving lid wards- burg, I had learned that Bev. Mr. Briant had been preaching in opposition to the views I had presented there concerning the first chapters of Genesis. So it was thought best that I should return to Edwards- burg, and make that case clear, which I did ; and on the 2nd of December, Mr. Silver again drove me over to Cassapolis, where I delivered two lectures on the Divine Trinity and Atonement. Mr. Briant was there, but did not come to hear my lectures. The next day I returned with Mr. S., to Edwards- burg where I delivered four lectures, at one of which, Mr. Briant was present; after which, in his sermon on Sunday, he took occasion to misrepresent, and speak ill of the New Church, and of Swedenborg, but as it was rather by inuendo, and by coarseness, I could do no more in replying than state the facta in their true light, which I did. Mr. Silver, next day (Dec. 8th), took mo with him to Little Prairie Ronde, (the home of the Copley family), calling on the way at Cassapolis, where we learned that Mr. Briant had been preach- ing against Swedenborg there also: — however, I did not stay, but proceeded at once to Mr. A. B. Copley's house ; and delivered three lectures at the 122 FOURTH ANNUAL MEETINO , , School house, in his neighborhood ; and baptized six adults, and four children. I then went to Kalamazoo, passing through Pawpaw, but not stay- ing there. At Kalamazoo I delivered two sermons on Sunday, at the "Branch," and on Monday com- menced delivering my Course on the Creation of the Universe, &c., also at the Branch of the University. These Lectures were not very numerously at- tended ; but they evidently awakened a spirit of enquiry in those who did attend ; many questions being asked and difficulties proposed for solution. I remained over another Sabbath, preaching as before ; and on Wednesday, the day before Christ- mas, went with Mr. Murray, as far as Battle Creek, where I again delivered four Lectures and preached twice on the Sabbath, at the Long Room, in the Eagle Block. On Monday, the 29th. I left Battle Creek, and the same evening commenced the delivery of my Lectures on the Creation, &c., at the Session House, in Marshall. These Lectures were very well attended and seemed to awake con- siderable interest ; many people rode over in their waggons each evening from Ceresco, Marengo, Eckford, Sec, to attend them. At their conclusion I went to Battle Creek to attend the Fourth Annual meeting of the Michigan and N. Indiana Associa- tion, which assembled there, in the Long Room, in the Eagle Block, (where the Receivers of the Doc- trines met for worship on the Sabbath,) on Friday morning, January 9th, 1846. There were present at this meeting Messrs. Dr. OF MICHIOAN ASSOOIATIOE. 123 E. A. Atlee, Hans Thielson, James Bailey, Thomas Weller, Henry Weller, William Newman, D. S. Calender, Abiel Silver, Orrin Silver, Chas. Hinckle, Jabez Fox, 11. H. Murray, S. W. Shaw, A. B. Cop- ley and G. Field ; also of ladies Mrs. S. Bailey, Mrs. Maria Astley, Mrs. M. F. Murray, Mrs. C. L. Rawson and some ten or twelve others. Communi- eations were also received and read from the Penn- sylvania and Illinois Associations, an I from Spring- field, Oakland Co., Mich. ; Ann Arbor, Edwards- burg, Jonesville, Ypsilanti, Mich. ; and from Goshen, Cleveland, and Noble County, Indiana ; and Green Bay, Wisconsin. Meetings for rship were held at the Friends' Meeting House, ... the evenings of Friday, Saturday and Mont^ on which occasions I also delivered J)iscour3ea on the Doctrines of the Church. On Sunday morning our meeting was held in the " Long Eoom" ; after the usual service two persons were baptized, and the Holy Supper administered to 13 persons. A social meeting was held in the after- noon. The Report of the Committee on Communi- cations at the meeting says, *' that tliere are within the Association, 160 adult Receivers of the Doctrines; (of whom 73 are baptized) ; and 137 interested Readers ; making in all 297 Readers «,nd Receivers." There were also known to be 117 New Church periodicals taken, within the Associa- tion ; also two N. C. Libraries, besides about 20 Tolumes of New Church Books in the Library of the University. Three organized Societies were reported as being formed within its limits, 124 FAVORABLE PROSPECTS. li i I viz : at Goshen, Edwardsburg and Springfield. Mr. Jacob King, the President of the Association was absent at this meeting, and Dr. E. A. Atlee presided in his stead ; and, in the election of officers for the ensuing year, — perhaps in consequence of the Report from the Goshen Society, saying, *' the Society is in favor of limiting eligibility to office, to members of the Church ; and considering that a Minister, if present, should preside at all meetings ;" — the Association so altered its Constitution as to make the President to be the " Presiding Minister "; and in accordance with which provision, I was elect- ed to that office. The meeting was pleasant and harmonious, and felt to be a season of refreshing encouragement. The Secretary in his Report of this Session, says the "meetings were well attended, and a favorable impression towards the New Church appeared to prevail in the place." And in the Re- port to the Convention this year, a similarly favor- able account is given ; " The Lord's Second Advent (it says), is gradually becoming manifest ; buc with- out noise or excitement ; and it is pleasant to know that men of intluence and talent are becoming re- ceivers ; and that the Doctrines of the Churcli are not inoperative upon their lives." January l'3tli, 184G, I returned to Detroit, and soon after this I rented the room on the ground floor, under my school-room, (intended for a store,) and bought benches, and had them painted ; arranged a pulpit, put up a stove with other con- veniences, — for holding our meetings for worship in ; as our audienr js were increasing. On the 7th QUARTERLY MEETINO. 125 of February, I went to Farmington to officiate at the funeral of Mr. Herrick's infant child, who before it had lived six months in this world, was removed to the Spiritual. I preached a funeral sermon there, on the occasion, at the Baptist Church ; and also baptized a child of Mr. T. Little. Owing to my being so much absent from my school, and engaged so much in preaching and Lecturing in Detroit, and in Missionary work, my School could not receive so much of my attention as it ought to have done. At this time, to enable me to meet my expenses, I kept "Widower's Hall," at my school room, and had my children with me, using my school-room as my kitchen, and a room adjoining for a bed-room. It was the best I was able to do. But on the 9th of March, having received an offer from Judge Bell, who was then Auditor-General, (having his office in the city,) to be engaged as a temporary clerk. I gave up my school, and accepted the offer. April lltli, 184G, the quarterly meeting was held in Detroit; there were not very many pr<'sent from a distance; but all who did attend appeared to be refreshed and encouraged. Two adults and two children were baptized after the morning service. There being now quite a number of people in Detroit who had become regular attendants at our public worship, and professed believers of our Doctrines, it seemed proper that they should do something themselves towards meeting our current expenses. I therefore proposed that they should obtain a more desirable place for our meetings for worship ; and as a very pleasant front room, up one I ii 126 MOVED TO BETTER ROOM. i pair of wide stairs, was for rent, in a more central place on Jefferson Avenue, in Kepublican Block, — ■which would seat nearly a hundred persons, they agreed to take it, and pay the rent, which was quite low; I also agreeing to furnish it, and have it warmed and lighted and kept clean ; and preach gratuitously, so on Sunday, May, 3rd (1846), we used it for the first time ; morning and evening ; and on the 8th a choir of singers was formed. I continued in the Auditor-General's Office till Satur- day, July 18th, when I quit it, not finding the em- ployment at all congenial, and the salary was but $500.00 a year. So I returned to School-teaching again, commencing on the following Monday, with three scholars, but more promised. I continued to preach to the Keceivers and others with scarcely any interruption till I made another short Mission- ary visit to Cleveland and Eockport, on Sunday September the 27th ;* morning and afternoon, I preached at the latter place ; and the following six evenings I delivered Lectures on the Doctrines of the New Church in Cleveland; and the next day (Sunday), preached in Eockport again; — On Mon- day, October 5th, I returned to Detroit. The Hon. Lucius Lyon, formerly a U. S. Senator, and now ** Surveyor General of the United States," and resid- ing in Detroit, had become an ardent receiver of the Doctrines of the New Church ; and he, being 1 •A Quarterly meeting of the Edwardal:arg and Goshen Societies was held at this time, iu Edwardsburg, at the Baptist Church, Mr. Strong attended, and preached, and Bap- tized 10 Adults. LECTURES ON THEOLOGY. 127 an intimate friend of General Cass, then Secretary of State, obtained from him permission for us to use the United States District Court Eoom for any of our meetings, when the Court was not in session; BO our room in Repubhcan Block was given up; and, in order to let our true position be as fully, and as clearly known as we could make it, the following Posting bill was pretty widely circulated through the city. "Lectures on Theology. "A course of lectures will be delivered by the Rev. G. Field, at the U. S. Court Room, (over the Post Office), commencing on Monday evening October 19th, [1846] , and continuing every evening until completed, on the following subjects:— THE NEW CHURCH in contrast with THE OLD CHURCH ;— or the Doctrines taught by Emanuel Swedenborg compared with those of the leading Sects of Christendom. First Position : That the First Christian Church has come to its end, or is consummated, as was the Jewish, at the time of the Lord's First Advent. Reasons will be presented for this assertion, in the fact that that Church, (the First Christian), is divided into Sects, among which there is not only no cohesion, but antagonism ; and that so far as there are fun- damental Doctrines, common to them all, as among the Roman Catholics, Episcopolians, Methodists, Presbyterians, Baptists, and minor divisions of the same general Sects, — so far they are substantially wrong ; and in the absence of all true knowlv3dge re- specting the Lord, — the Trinity, — Redemption, — if •t* I" 1 i 128 MOVED TO U. S. COURT ROOM* the Sanctity of the Word, — Faith, Charity and Life, — Regeneration, — Heaven and Hell, — the Human Soul, — the State of Man after Death, — the Resurrection, — Judgment, — Second Advent, — Angels, — Eternity, — Infinity, &c. These remarks will apply with equal force to Universalists, Uni- tarians, &c. Second Position: That in conse- quence of the ahove, the prophetic enunciation is now fulfilled, 'Behold I make all things new;' and that at this day a New Dispensation of Divine Truth is revealed to man, in which a full know- ledge is imparted of everything relating to man's spiritual well-being, — the laws of the spiritual world, and its relation to the natural ; and of all those realities which man, in his long degenera- tion, has lost, — and that, in the words of Sweden- borg, — ' This New and true Church, which the Lord is establishing at this day, will exist to all eternity ; — that it will be the crown of the four preceding Churches; and that it has been fore- seen from the creation of the world, — proved from the Word of both the Old and New Testaments.' Coronis to T, C. R. These pretensions will be esteemed as idle as the Doctrines of Swedenborg have been deemed visionary, by those who are ignorant of their value, and too prejudiced to be informed. Still the conviction is gradually pres- sing itself on the minds of men, that this judg- ment must be reversed; for it does not explain the fact, that so far as they have been investigated by men of unquestioned virtue, and the soundest, and most cultivated minds, — these claims have PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT. 129 re been allowed. No one understanding them has ever rejected them. Not only Laymen, but Clergymen also, of the highest talents, from the Episcopal, Presby- terian, Methodist, Baptist, Universalist, Unitarian, and other denominations, are continually receiv- ing and proclaiming the Heavenly Doctrines of the New Jerusalem. In these Lectures, the Doc- trines of the various Sects of the Old Church, will be freely and candidly examined, and compared with those of the New ; and, the premises being admitted, the conclusions will be such as cannot be gainsaid. And lest the assumed premises should even be remotely wrong, an opportunity will be afforded for their correction ; and notice will be given in advance, of the subject to be canvassed ; the object being to prove, beyond contradiction, the absolute truth of these pretentions. *'The effort will be to present this whole subject in the clearest light ; and at the same time with the utmost good wall, and with the kindliest feelings towards those whose errors may be exposed. The religiously disposed and reflecting, among the Laity, and Clergymen of ever}-^ Denomination, are especial- ly and most respectfully invited to attend. Lect- ures Free. To commence precisely at a quarter past seven o'clock." It may be dilHcult to tell precisely what effect Buch an announcement would have upon the mind of the public : doubtless it would be different with different persons ; — and there may be those who would think it was imprudent to make such decla- rations ; they would say it would prejudice people m i 180 AVOWAL OF FAITH. i . in advance, and keep thera away, and would there- fore be injurious. Perhaps it would have this effect on some; — but then it is also very doubtful if such persons would have attended had none of these things been said ; — or, if they had attended, as soon as they learned what the New Church really meant, they would have kept away: or even if they still had come, they would always bring their fears, and their doubts with them, and have rather neutralized the efforts of others, than really aided them. In saying these things, it was only saying what Swedenborg had said again and again ; and saying it too in his own words, as in the True Christian Keligion ; the Coronis, Canons of the New Church ; and in other of his works. And if the Old Church has not come to its end, what need is there of a New one ? And if we an- nounce a New Church, have we not a right to give our reason luhy a New Church is needed ? It was in the light of these considerations that the above handbill was issued ; and though it might have disturbed some, there was a much larger number that it attracted. The first lecture was not largely attended ; at the subsequent ones the audiences were much larger. A Universalist Minister who attended, asked a number of questions ; as also did another gentle- man. I lectured every evening, and concluded the Course on Monday the 25th. when I was requested to deliver another Course of Lectures. After some deliberation and consultation it was thouglit best to repeat my Course on the Creation, with some NEW COURSE OF LECTURES. 131 auditions. Another posting bill was therefore cir- culated over the city, of which the following is a copy. LECTURES ON THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE. The Deluge, — Standing Still of the Sun and Moon — Miracles, Magic, aucl the long-lost Science of Corretpondeiices, or Key of Kiiowlodgo. By particular request, the Rev. G. Field wiU repeat, and extend his Course of Lectures on the Creation aud Deluge ; and in addition, will explain, by laws not hereto- fo.'e known, the phenomena of Miracles ; aud the abuse of thoB« laws in Magic, Sorcery, and Witchcraft, at the U. S. Court Room, (over the Post Office), commencing on Wednesday evening, November, 11th, [1846J , and continued every Wednes- day and Saturday evenings, until completed. Admission Free. PROGRAMME. Lecture Ibt. — Primeval language. The nature and laws of the God-given tongue. Tacit, vocal, and written speech. Leciure 2nd. — Origin of Mythology, Astrology, and the signs in the heavens ; and the symbolic style prior to the days of Abraham. Lecture 3rd. — Proofs, rational, inductive, and philosophical, that the first chapters of Genesis do not, and are not intended to treat of the Creation aud destruction of the material earth. Lecture -Ith. — On the Creation of the Universe ; more particularly of our Earth, and the Solar System. LicTURE 5tu. — The true meaning of the first chapter of Genesis. Lecturk 6tii. — The laws of Creation, and Spiritual influx. Primeval formations in the Vegetable aud Animal Kiugdoma. TYlq first Man. Lecture Tth. — The second chapter of Genesis. What it does not mean, and what it does. The Garden of Eden, Rivers, Trees, Serpent, Adam, Eve, &c. Lecture 8th. — The Flood, Proofs absolute, that no such Flood as is recorded in Genesis, ever literally occurred upon the earth; or could have occurred, — examined on its own authority ; rationally philosophically, and geologically. i I *!« :|i| 182 INTEREST MANIFESTED. Lkcture 9th. — "Wliat js tlie meaning of the inundation of the earth, on the accepted Canon, of the Scriptures being their own interpreter. Lkctdke 10th. — The standing still of the Sun and Moon, at the command of Joshua. Lecture IIth. — On Miracles, Magic, Incantation, Sorcery, Witchcraft, and Animal Magnetism. Lecture 12Tn. — On the Miracles of Egypt, and why the Magicians could not turn the dust into hce, when yet they performed all the preceding miracles of Moses and Aaron." Then followed a number of selections of Notices of the Press: At the first Lecture, although the night was dark, and the streets were muddy, there was a good audien«.j. At the second Lecture, although the weather was equally unfavorable, the audience was yet larger. At the third Lecture, which was two hours and a quarter long, the audience still increased ; and so also at the fourth Lecture, which was a yet longer one ! And though the weather continued to be so unpleasant, the audience at the fifth and sixth lectures kept in- creasing. At the eight and ninth lectures the Court House was quite full; and so continued, even to being crowded, to the close of the Course. There was a great deal of interest manifested in these Lectures, and people from most of the Churches in the City attended them, although one gentleman said they were the rankest infidelity, universalism, and fatalism ! Before I concluded the Course, one of the merchants in the city, on behalf of a number of those who had attended, pre- sented me a purse containing fifty dollars in gold; and a special committee from the Young Men's MORE OPPOSITION. 133 Society called on me with an invitation to deliver a Lecture before them, which I did,* and was elect- ed an honorary member of their body. I was also requested to deliver another Course of Lectures on the Doctrines of the Church. It was not, however, till the 6th of December (1846), we gave up the use of the lioom in Republican Block, and com- menced our meetings for wornhip on the Sabbath in the U. S. Court Room, which we had rent free. About a week previous to this, I had again given up my School, to accept the situation of Draftsman in the Surveyor General's Office. During this time our audience on the Sabbath was continually increasing, there being generally about a hundred present in the morning, and more in the evening. Among these were some who were members of other Churches; and, as might be expected, their Ministers began to feel uneasy and excited. This feeling at last culminated in a direct assault ; not in argument or refutation, or even an attempt to shew that anything that I had advanced was un- true ; but by slander, calumny, and vituperation, to endeavor to make us appear infamous ! The Editor of the Christian Herald, a Baptist paper published in Detroit, and edited by Rev. Jas. Inglis, led off in this assault, ai)parently irritated b .-yond endurance, because at this time, at the opening of the Session of the Legislature, my name had been proposed along with several other clergymen of the City, as Chaplain to the Senate ; and I was I i * The subject of this Lecture was tho iufluence of the ciron- latioQ of the Scriptures on the Arts and Sciences. I i 134 THE CHRISTIAN HERALD. almost unanimously elected. Then the vials of wrath were opened, and poured out like rain. In the issue of the ChriHian Herald for January 17th, 1847, a leading editorial appeared, of great length, headed " Attempts to foist Stvedenbonfidnism into notice.'" It is difficult to find words with which to descrihe the shameful character of this article ; nor do I possess a copy of it, although its leading and salient points may be seen in what follows. As soon as it appeared however, some of the most active and inlluontial of the friends of tlie New Church met together to consider what should be done about it ; among these were Hon. Lucius Lyon, Surveyor-General of the U. S., Hon. D. V. Bell, Auditor-General, Hon. John Allen and H. P. Bush, State Senators, Amos T. Hall, Deputy State Treasurer ; and the Chaplain of the Senate. — Indeed it was now called the State Church, on account of our having so many persons holding office who were receivers of the New Church Doctrines. At this meeting it was unanimously agreed that I should be requested to write a reply to this scur- rilous article, and demand its publication in the same paper. I accordingly wrote a reply, and called another meeting of our friends for the purpose of submitting it to them ; and, it meeting their entire approval, Mr. Lyon was appointed to take it to Mr. Inglis, and request its insertion in the Herald. But Mr. Inglis positively refused to let it appear ! Then the question arose. What shall we do now ? , A REPLY TENDERED. 185 And it was decided to have it published in the Detroit Daily Advertiser, and in its Weekly Issue. And also simultaneously in the Detroit Free Prest, and its Weekly issue. And at the same time it appeared in the two Ann Arbor papers, each edited by a New Churchman, (the one by Geo* Corselius ; and the other by John Allen). Also 600 copies were printed in Tract form for circula- tion ; so that it had more than ton times the num- ber of readers it would have had, if it had been published in the Herald, as requested. As this reply quotes very fully from Mr. Inglis' article, as well as replies to it, although very lengthy ; yet on account of its importance in its relation to the effect it had on the growing interest of the New Church in Detroit at this time, I venture to give it in full, as a Document connected with its history. It was headed thus : — "lleply to the Attack made on the New Church, by the llev. James Inglis, in the Michif/<in Christi<in llcndd; on the tendency o^ the writings of the Honble. Emanuel Swodenborg." After which, addressing him in propria per4ona, I say : *' To the Rev. James Inglis, Editor of the Michiijan Christian Herald : " Sir: — There is an editorial in your paper of this day's date, of considerable length, purporting to tell what * Swedenborgianism' is ; and (although perhaps unintentionally,) really telling what it is not. If you had simply stated that to which we Jjad no right to take exceptions, or had no just ground for so doing, we should be content to let it ' ¥ : 186 SCANDALOUS CHAROES. pass unnoticed, but it is not so. We do protest against ar.l deny the view that you have presented of us ; we affirm that we are injured and scan- dahzed by that article, and as such, think that we do not ask too muc}» ''n requesting the insertion of this reply. Should . deny it, it will but add to the obloquy which such a course of treatment can- not fail to inflict upon yourself. You speak of us in the most contemptuous terms. — You call us '* infatuated," and describe us as " shallow quibblers, cowardly infidels, self-indulgent boasters, and morbid doaters on earthly mysteries :" — as using ** substitutes for religion, cloaks for infidelity," — and you say that " in the cunning efforts of its ministers to beguile unstable souls, may not those we love be drawn into their pernicious ■ways'?" — Andindee' hat we " have enticed and entrapped the honcL iC sincere and the lovely," &c. And after much more to the same effect, •which we shall notice in order, you thus conclude your chapter of expletives and declamations : — ** Such a thing may thrive in the licentious courts and capitals of Europe, — the people of Michigan will spurn it from their shores !" Yet, (on the opposite side of the same paper, and it is well it is the opposite), you say, ^'Jhlelity and honestif, com- bined with vharitji and Jorhearance, are eminently demanded (!) of the advocates of a pure and spiritual Christianity !" and " from our defence and our ad- vocacy we shall seek to exclude all bitterness and wi'dth, and anger, and clamor, and evil speaking, and in all our dealings with brethren of every name. IN BAPTIST PAPER. 187 we wouW bo actuated l)y the apostolic precept, "forbearing one another, even as God for Christ's sake, hath forgiven you." Wo appeal to your own heart and ask if you have thus dealt with us? "What can we say to such chart^es, but that they are unfounded, and unworthy of aChristian minister to make ? We ask what evil have we done ? We learn in our church that every injury inflicted upon another, wounds those most who inflict it, and if you had known this, you might, perhaps, have been more sparing in your denunciations. Still, we do not complain that such an article will do U8 any permanent injury ; it oversteps propriety far too much for that ; but it may mis- lead some minds, and give them erroneous impres- sions, which you, as a Minister of Truth, would certainly wish to see corrected. But before speak- ing of these particularly, I would notice the lead- hig idea, and I suppose the most painful of all, viz : — That in the election of Chaplain of the Senate of this state, Mr. Inglis received two votes* and Mr. Field eleven.* Now you would seek to rescue this commonwealth from the obloquy and disgrace that will attach to our humiliating position in the eyes of sister states" by this act, and for this purpose you would enlighten our Senators* shew them that they have not been less " infatuated" than ourselves, by lending " their sanction and influence" to the teacher of these " mysteries," and • The vote stood thus :— Rev. Dr. Duffield. 1 ; Rev. J, B. Davidson, 1 ; Rev. Stebbins, 1 ; Bishop McCoskry, 1 ; Rev. J. A. Baughmau, 2 ; Rev. J. IngUs, 2 ; Rev. G. Field, 11. 138 FALSE STATEMENTS. thus "by an overt act sought to enrol 'Us] among Christian denominations !" With deference we submit that our honorable Senators are competent to judge for themselves who shall be their Chaplain ; l)ut was there the most remote su&^jicion for the thought that they repented of their choice, the present incumbent would instantly withdraw, and afford an opportuni- ty for the Senate to make a re-election. You call us infidels ''cowardly infidels,'" seeking by ** an overt act, to be enrolled among Christian deno- minations ;" but here you do but reveal how lament- ably ignorant you are of our true position. We assure you, Sir, that we are not infidels, but so far othciwise, that our doctrines are the oiili/ jyroper antidote Jor infidelitif. Hence it is that so many who have been made such by the inconsistencies and contradictions presented in what is termed orthodox}', have become sincere believers in the Divine Word, through the light of the New Jerusa- lem ; and what is remarkable, — no person, once intelligently receiving this enlightened faith, was ever known to forsake it ! And as for being coward- ly, we know of no act of ours that can come under that reproach. We openly avow our belief to the whole world, and are ready to defend it when assailed. You appear but now to have discovered that those you love may be drawn into our " pernicious ways," and that we have " enticed and entrapped the honest, the sincere and the lovel3\" It is certainly true that those, and especially those who are ** honest, sincere and lovely," are such as find a DENIED AND REFUTED. 139 kindred home witbin the walls of our New Jerusalem, and there we believe, none others will seek to enter. But it is not true when you say that they are ** enticed and entrapped." What inducements could we offer ? They would know that they must be expo«ed to such revilin.'^s as your present notice is a specimen of ; but did you know the joy they experience in these heavenly doctrines, notwith- Btanding this, you would hardly say that they felt entangled. Besides it does not explain the fact that ministers of your own denomination, have embraced our faith. The last I know of, is the Rev. Mr. Wilkes, of New York, who has been 23 years a Baptist minister, and about a year ago was re-baptized into the New Jerusalem and is now a licenced preacher. If you should think that he was entdnyled, I will furnish you with a copy of his public address, (for insertion in your paper,) de- livered upon his renunciation of the Baptist faith, and embracing that of the New Jerusalem, which will convince you that however much he might have been entangled before that he is free now. Or should one such case be insufficient, it is easy to furnish more. But "Job Abbott" has unravelled the tangled thread of Jiaptist orthodoxy, morG successfully than perhaps any other person, and before you attack us again, you had better read that book. Let me here reason with you a moment, — You call our Church a " revived delusion, which may entrap immortal souls," and as being unworthy of being classed among " Christian denominations," !i ■' I'll 140 THE FUTURE NEW CHURCH. I I i i &c. &c. Yet, I cannot but think, that had you made yourself better acquainted with our doctrines, you ivould not, you could not have said this. So far from seeking to enrol ourselves under one or other of your peculiar standards, or even as taking common ground among you — we utterly dis- claim it. All your sects and parties bear the same relation to us, that the Jewish Church did to the primitive Christian. We hold that all that first Christian Church, (by whatever name now called,) is consummated. And notwithstanding your expressed conviction, that the New Church now being estab- lished upon the earth, is but an ephemeral delusion' we affirm that it will be the crown of all Churches, the (jlory of the whole Earth, and trill endure for ever. You say that "it is right that it should be known, that out of this city there is not an organ- ized body of Swedenborgians in the state." — Here, Sir, your statistics are slightly at fault ; for we have not as yet an organized body in Detroit, at all. But we have three in the state, and certainly more than one ordained minister. And if you should have any further use for information of this kind, I would say that we are even now very few in number, every where. But about five years ago, there were not more than a dozen receivers of our doctrines known in the state, now, however, they are scattered in almost every part of this peninsula, and will increase, with the growing intelHgence of the people. Turn we now to Swedenborg, and how stinted are your encomiuma. You seem to think that he OPINIONS OF MAGAZINES. 141 possessed nothing more than " a general smatter- ing of science," &c. How unbecoming it seems for one in your responsible situation, to thus determine without knowing, (see Prov. ch. 18, v. 13,) or if knowing, then, worse still, to refuse credit. The editor of the " Southern Literary Messenricr," who has for " the last 20 years" noticed with the *' curious eye of a spectator,'" the growth of the New Church, speaks of Swedenborg as acquainted " with the principles of almost every art and science within the range of human inquiry ;-— was minute and accurate, and whose contributions to philosophy, to the mathematics, and especially to theology, rare and wonderful in their kind, are more voluminous, probably, than those of any other author, living or dead." And the editor of the " Monthly Review," says : — " We have seen that in philosophy, mineralogy, magnetism, anatomy, physiology, algebra, ethics, theology and geometry, he excelled all other authors of his age." " Men of slender pretensions, and even those taking high rank among the jjeritissimi of the day, have been accustomed to dismiss with a sneer, or condemn with a scowl, all mention of or reference to, Emanuel Swedenborg. The " enthu- siast, visionary, monomane, the man who affected to converse with beings of another world, the cal)a- listic mystic, — in short, the madman dreamy." ** A person" say they, "who pretended to enjoy intercourse with invisible beings ; — who affected to be able to converse with the spirits of the de- parted, and who indulged in the delusive fancies of 142 GENIUS OP SWEDENBORQ. a heated, if not distempered brain, can surely lay no claim to the title of a man of science, and pre- tend to be expositor of the all but hidden laws of nature," &c. " This, or something like this, is the opinion, either expressed or implied, of most persons with •whom we have conversed respecting Swedenborg and his works. And it is not derogatory to us to say, that until we perused some of his works — such is the influence of early academic prejudice, — that we were just as much inclined to unite in the general censure, as are those to whom we have just now alluded." But, he continues, *' visionaries do not deal in geometry and algebra, and mathe- matics, nor do they make great discoveries in the brain." " In fine, we record our opinion, positively, and not relatively ; wholly, and without reservation, that if the mode of reasoning and explanation adopted by Swedenborg, be once understood, the anatomist and physiologist will acquire more in- formation, and obtain a more comprehensive view of the human body, and its relation to a higher sphere, than from any single book ever published. Nay, we may add, than from all the books which have been written (especially in modern times,) on physiology. Swedenborg reasons not on any hypothesis, nor on any theory, nor on any favorite doctrine of a fashionable school, but on the solid principles of geometry, based on the immutable rock of Truth. And he must and will be considered at no distant period, the Zoroaster of Europe, and the Prometheus of a new era of reason — however SWEDENBORG S DISCOVERIES. 143 at present the clouds of prejudice may intervene, or the storms of passion obscure the coruscations of his intellect." — Monthly Review, June, 1844. Still you say, " with what discovery is his name identified ? What contribution has he made to human knowledge ? Unless we concede that his dreams are true revelations of the spirit world, none, — it is not pretended." Though we consider it to be of little consequence whether he did make any discoveries in science, or not, yet when it is thus denied that he made any, and that it is not even pretended that he did ; we are led to inquire if you have ever read, or even seen, in Latin or in English, Swedenborg's ** Principia,'" (2vols. 8vo.) — his "Animal Kingdom,'' (2vols., 8vo.,) — his " Economy of the Animal Kingdom,"" (2 vols., 8 vo.,) — his work on the Brain, or on Iron, Copper and Brass, &c. ? Or are you aware of the discovery •which Swedenborg made of the coincidence of motion between the brain and the lungs ? or of " a passage of communication between the right and left, or two lateral ventricles of the cerebrum, afterwards attributed to Dr. Monro, as the ^* Foramen of Monro V — Or of his discovery of a seventh planet 40 years before it was proclaimed by Herschel ? If you do not know these things, it is useless to ask further. You have certainly shown how ably you can criticise the Master Genius of the age ! *' We follow you now in your expositions of * Swedenborgianism ! ' as you are pleased to term it, to the account you give of Swedenborg's pecu- ^'1 »«1 ■■i ■W" 144 SHAMEFUL ATTACK. i liar psycological condition. You say that 'he was in a superior Mesmeric state ! — he was the Prince of Clairvoyants ; ' and this, you affirm, is stating his claims as they were presented by his friends ! ' " " Now we do most distinctly affirm, that the friends of Swedenborg never do, or have said any such thing ; but that on the other hand, they have uniformily protested against everything of the kind. Indeed, no one could know enough of Swedenborg to be his friend, who would say any such tiling. And now we come to notice the last and most dis- reputable thing of all. You say that this system * panders to each corrupt propensity,' and ' offering to the heart in all its corruptions, unlimited indul- gence. There is not a demand of passion, any more than an emotion of pride, that is not flattered with a license ! ' And you ask in triumphant cli- max, whether parents * will be willing to furnish mistresses for its disciples, from the fairest of their daughters?'" ** Oh, Shameful ! Shameful ! — What spirit could possess any man, so to write ? — If you were ignor- ant why did you not learn '? But if you knew, why did you say so? Did you not think that then you had made the fatal stab ? But did you examine the quality of the spirit that dictated it ? The world knows of nothing so pure and spotless as our heaven- ly doctrine of conjugial love. — Nothing can exceed its beauty, or equal its exalted virtue. It is the hal- lowed love of those angels nearest to the throne of God ; and Swedenborg everywhere presents this as the proper life of those who shall constitute the Lord's New Church. REFUTED AND EXPOSED. 115 " But besides this celestial or angelic love, he describes that which is infernal — tlio lusts and con- cupiscences of devils, which he denominates * the pleasures of ijimnity concerning Scortatory Lov<\' " Have you read, Sir, the treatise on Conjugial and scortatory love ? I infer that you have not, because I notice that you quote precisely the same passages, and in the same words, that Dr. Wood does in his work against our author, (whicli are not correctly quoted by him, conse({uently, not by you !) and which you bring forward in a far more unjust manner than even he does. Suppose an infidel were to object to the truth of the Scriptures, because of the conduct of Lot's two daughters, (den. ch. IJ), from V. 131 to end of ch., also the 8th v. of the same ch.,) and Abraham's intercourse with Hagar — or Sampson, (see Judges, 10th ch. v. 1st. — and Amos, 7 ch. 17th V. — or Hosea, cii. 1 v. 2, &c. &c.) then how would you reason ? " Whatever your answer may be, it will apply to your own position. Swedenborg everywhere des- cribes lusts and fornications of every kind, as sins, and teaches that they should be shunned as such — and that no one, in the love and indulgence of these passions, can enter heaven. But that the vilest of the Hells are composed of adulterers, and also says that " at this day that Hrll increases, owing its increase particularly to those who are of the Christian world, so called, and who have their chief delights inadulteries.'- -And that ' there have been some of each sex from that part of the world called Cliristendom, who during tlieir life in the ii 14G TIIK WICKED IN HELL, if Ixtdy, have t]ioii<^lit arlulterieR not only lawful, but likewise holv, and have thus considered what the\' hav3 impionsly termed common or jn-omiscuous marriages, under an appearance of holiness. 1 observed that such were sent to Gehenna.' * Thev ft' who ensnare,' he says, ' by pretending a regard for conjugial love, and for love towards children, be- having themselves in such a manner, that a hus- band has no suspicion but they are chaste, innocent and frieudlv guests, and who under such and various other appearances, commit adultery with greater security. These are in a hell beneath the back parts, in the most filthy ordure, and are vas- tated to such a degree as to become like mere bonejs, because they rank with the treacherous ! ' And ' it was told them that it is as impossible for such adult- erers, void of conscience, to come into Heaven, as for a fish to live in air, or a bird in ether ; because on the instant of their approach thereto, they feel, as it were, a suffocation, and their adulterous de- light is changed into a most offensive stench ; — And further, that they must needs be thrust down into hell, and become finally, like bony substances, with little life in them, because they have accpiired to themselves a life so wicked, that when tlicy lose it, there remains so very little of life truly human." * All such ' he continues, ' suffer the most grievous punishment in another life, inasmuch as their life in this world has been contrary to all ordtr, natural, spiritual, and celestial; and not only contrary to conjugial love, which in Heaven is accounted most holv, but also contrary to innocence, which they AND THK WICKKD ON EARTH. 14' wound and kill, by engaging innocent virj^inB in a life of prostitution, who might 1)0 initiated intoconju- gial love. The destroyers of such love are interior homicides ; they must needs sutler in another life the most grievous punishment.' "And yet, Sir, while we believe such dreadful results liapp(!n in the other life to fornicators and adulterers, you actually say we give these passions 'unlimited indulgence,' and either ignorantly or wilfully present us as luring into this dire and in- fernal life, ' the honest, the sincere and the lovel}' I ' and appeal with subtle craft, to woman's dearest treasure — to lacerate and wound her finest sensi- bilities, by so ruthless and cruel an attack. Oli, Sir ! could you see the face of your own soul, as it will be seen in the eternal world, you would not again try by such a desperate effort, to pour out poisoned water upon the fair fame of the daughters of the New Jerusalem. P]very honest female, every truth- ful heart will brand this artifice with the stamp it merits, and recoil indignantly from such a charge. And shame, hiirniiKj shame, will yet mount into your face, and cause your ears to tingle. Yet Swedenborg teaches that there are different degrees of enormity amongst the sensual, the brutal and filthy; and distinguishes between them, and shows that there are cases, where the pre- servation of the life, or of the reason c^ould not otherwise be effected, than by the permission of certain lesser evils, according to the law of the Divine Providence, which is that Irsser eiuJs are permitted a-hen theij will prevent greater, because ^:ii^ ■ i :i \r' 148 SCORTATOUY LOVE. thus successively all rr/7.s can be removed, when otherwise they could not at all. And this we helieve to l)e tau^^ht in the internal sense of these words: — "And Jehovah, thy God willput out those nations by little and little. Thou raayest not con- sume them at once, lest the (wild) beasts of the field increase upon thee." (Deut. 7. 22.) And Sweden- borg's work on Scortatory Love, or infernal lusts, from which you have quoted, (through J)r. Wood), is for the use of such abandoned and prostituted creatures as are in the connnission of the vilest and most inordinate passions, that they may be elevated, step by step, from the lowest wretched- ness, even to angelic hai'pincss. "It was for the same reason that minor evils were permitted among the -Tews, ' because of the hardness of their hearts," or they would have rushed into the most dreadful enormities, and from whicli they were thus withdrawn. And Paul seems to have acted upon the same principle with his Gentile converts, permitting tln-m to do what was not allowed to the converted Jews. — Acts, 15 ch. vs. 10, 19, 20, 28, 21). And the Jews did then, what you would fain do now. -See Acts. ch. 13, vs. 50. And thus, though our author says so distinctly and plainly, that all such sins are contrary to the law and life of Heaven, and no one can be received in the Church who does not acknowledge that all evils must be shunned as sins against God, and that we must live a life according to the Connnand- ments ; yet you say that these things are not only 'flattered with a licence," and allowed ' milimited K SWEDENHOIUl S WUITINOS. 141) in(lulp;oncc,' but even intimate that they are pmctiaed by the nicinbers of the New Church ! l^jither, Sir, coine forward at once and renounce this Ciihiinnious assertion, or it must and will redound to your discredit — not only now, but will ])e written on your book of life to eternity. " In conclusion, we intreat you and your readers to examine carefully and i)rayerfully, these won- drous writings, for they will brinf; peace and hap- piness to your soul. In the words of the writer in the Southern QaartcrJif licricir, we may say ' how- ever slow their progress may have been in times past, and in however little pojjular favor held, 'they; are destined to impart a new impulse to social progress, and infuse new life into the body politic and theological: we cannot hesitate to assign to them that prominence which they seem to v^ vO fairly entitled to claim at the hands of patriots, philanthropists and Christians. Their influence even now is beginning to be more deeply felt than is generally imagined. Some of the most masterly writers of our day and country, are deeply imbued with the spirit and general tone of thinking, of the Swedish seer — appear to have sounded the depths of his spiritual philosophy, and to have slaked their thirst with liberal and refreshing <lraughts from the overflowing fountain of his writings.' And * that the promised period already approaches — that tli(! seals are already broken — that light already streams with a new and living splendor, from the sacred page : jind they accordingly turn to that new star which alreadv glitters in the East 'tii 150 Mil. INOLIS INDIGNANT. with reverence and joy, as the harliiiigir of a brighter and a better day.' " How {greatly Hhines the illuHtrious Hcribo, whose pen UnfoldH the preciouH scieuce of GocVa Word ; How Hiiik tlie labors of all other men, Coinnarcd with his wliose li{»ht was from the Lonl. *' These, grovelliiij^, strive to reach the vast profound Of Truth Divine, to men and anj^els j^iven ; While lie, triurnphunt soars al>o\e the i^roiuid, And ri'ads the sacred oracleH in Heaven. " In that hri<,'ht li^'ht what f^lories meet his eye I From that hrij,'ht sphere, what wonderH fill his mind ; lie learns angelic wisdom in the sky, And bears it down to earth to bless mankind. " Yours, very respectfully, " George Fikld. ''Detuoit, Jan. 18tb, 1847." ^Mr. Inglis was indignant that any other papers should have consented to publisli this Reply, after he had refused to do so ! But, not having accom- l)lished his purpose in this his first essay, he re- solved to try again ; and to this he was undoutedly additionally uiov«.h1 from the fact, that not less than six of the members of his Church had become avowed receivers of the New Church Doctrines, and attended our meetings. So the next move was to get a cojiy of the work on Conji((/ial Lor-' -I'l out from it the append- ed treatise on ^ » sures of insanity concern- ing Sd ' . presenting this sundered append. > the 1 .Uing and most influential clergy- men of the so ailed Evang(;lical Churches in the TRYING AGAIN. 151 IX city ; requested them to read it, and then give him their opinion in writing, of the character and ten- dency of Swedenhorg's writings ! This they readily agreed to do, — excepting one, and that one was Bishop McCronky, of the Episcopal Church, — he declined, — not, however, hecause he felt any more friendly to the New Church than the others did ; hut, as I was informed, his answer was, — " No Sir, I shall have nothing to do with it ; and allow me to say that I think tjon will do quite as well to do nothing with it either ; at all events I am deter- mined to give no help to it, or to let Swedenbor- gianisra ride into notice on my shoulders." But, not heeding this, Mr. Inglis persevered, and in due course of time obtained his desired documents, and so, on the 15th of March, the following Editorial appeared, together with the above communications: " SWEDENBOlKl's WRITINGS." " We proceed to redeem a pledge, formerly given, that we should bring forward conclusive testimony as to the immorality and licentiousness of the writings of Swodenborg. Wlion the justness of our first remarks on tliis subject was disputed, we felt that no other course remained open to us, — for while we were conscious of having made ;i mild re- presentation of the case, rather tiian an exaggerat- ed estimate of its enormities ; we were, from the nature of it, shut out from an opportunity of a full justification. For we dare not assume the respon- sibility 01 s[)rcading out but'oro readers of all ages and conditions, the polluted, and polluting princi- ples of this system. The oi)inions expressed below !il-f| 152 IGNORANCE DISPLAYED. i' ■v >( will, doubtless, satisfy all candid readers, — and warrant a repetition of the opinion that, ' such a system may do for the licentious courts and capitals of Europe ; but the people of Wichi{j;an will spurn it from their shores.' Before introducin<j; our testi- mony, it may be proper to say a word or two on the general tendency ot the system. It may be supposed that we have selected the treatise on Scortator}- love, as being the worst, and most ob- jectionable part of the writings ; and that all the rest are characterized by purity. Now while the principles of that work are of such a character, as, in themselves to settle the question of the Divine origin of the system of which they form a part ; we may remark, that in almost every part of the sys- tem are to be found principles as ungodly, and views as base. It will be admitted that one of the fairest and most unquestionable tests of a religious system, or a man's religious principles, may be found in the character of the heaven to which they lead; — here you have their full development, — their perfected results. And what is the charac- ter of the Swedenboxgian heaven '? Swedenborg, who asserts that the i\Iahometan religion is of Divine orighi, places the Mahometan paradise on the outside of the Swedenborgian heaven ; and the readers of the Alcoran would, perhaps, fail to see any very good reason why they should be in any way separated. We will admit that the .sentiment is elevated somewhat in the writings of the Swedish pretender ; but, after all, the picture he draws is of the same / OF THK STATE AFTER DEATir. l.")3 \ I order. According to liim, distinction of sex remains after death, — love of the sex, and conjugal love re- main — and consorts in Heaven, after all are suitably mated ' 'enjoy intercourse with each other, similar to that which they enjoyed in the world, hut more pleasant and bli'ssed, and without prolitication.' And this is heaven I This is that for which patri- archs, and prophets, and apostles, waited, and looked, and longed!! And for this we are to ex- change the hope of the inheritance incorruptil)l(', undefiled, and that fadeth not away, eternal in the heavens ! ! ! The conversation of angels, as reported by the strange intruder into the spirit world, would not be tolerated by respectable people in America ; and where it is not gross in its allusions, it is so childish as to be intolerable to any but lovesick swains. We might open at random for instances : but as we have already bestowed more space upon it than many of our readers will think warrantable, we shall merely refer to two. In one of his relations, regarding the spirit world, ho makes an (iiincl say to certain strangers, to whom he had shown some things in heaven ; ' In heaven wo love virgins for their beauty, and the elegance of their manners, and we love them intensely and chastely.' In reply to which, his companions said, 'Who can behold such beauties neiir, and not feel some desire.' In another relation, he gives an accountof a discussion, which was held by the spirits of three new comers of distinction, who luid been permitted to see the magnificence, and the virgins, III 154 ORIGIN OF BEAUTY. Ill i ; and wives of heaven ; * on the origin of the heauty of the female sex." The last speaker thus sums up, * What is beauty hut the delight of the sight ? Whence is the origin of this delight, but from the sport of love and wisdom. From this sport the light is brilliant, and this brilliancy darts itself from eye to eye, and forms beauty. What makes beauty of face but red and white, and the beauti- ful mixture of these with each other ? Is not the red from love, and the white from wisdom, these two T have seen manifestly in the face of two con- sorts in heaven. The redness of whiteness in the wife ; and the whiteness of redness in the husband, and I have observed that from looking at each other, they shone forth, v/e could almost venture to alhrm that the speaker would have l)een hissed out of the Lyceum of a Lunatic Asylum, l)ut in the palace above they have a different standaud of common sense, from what is known in this dull sphere, for the assembl}'' of spirits 'clapped their hands, and shouttil. He has conquered : and sud- denly a llamy light, which is also the light of con- jagial love, tlien'hlled the house with splendor, and their hearts, with pleasanfcuess.' And must we actually stoop, at this day, and in this country, to discuss tlie inspiration of such a man '? We do not believe it can ever come to that. Those who are acquainted with the Baron's writings, know that we have still kept back the worst of this com[)()und of profanity, obscc'nity, and folly. We shall be sorry to be driven to unveil it. The following ex- pression of opinions, will speak for themselves. ^ DR. DUFFIELD S LETTER. 155 i "DETRoir, March lOtli, 1847. The Bev. J. Inglis, l)E\n Siu. — At your request I have examined the treatise of Swedenborg, entitled, 'The pleasures of insanity concerning Scortatory love.' Its language and thoughts, in many pages, cannot but prove injurious to youthful minds. It aliirms false and dangerous positions in morals, and is eminently adapted to minister a salvo to the consciuncesol some whose actions are lascivious. He falsely and dangerously teaches that actions which the Scriptures condemn as criminal, such as fornication, can be rendered excusable and good, by good purposes or ends. Concubinage, he says, in the same way, may become lawful. Other things of kindred character, with great particularity, are set forth as Divine revelations! I am perfectly disgusted with its pages. The dissemination of such a work cannot fail to excite a most pestilentijil influence in Society, by corrupting the minds, and morals of youth. That any should for one moment, conceive it possible that the num who wrote such a iilthy treatise, can lay claim to Divine inspiration, would lead me to question, as well, their sense of X)urity, as tiie sanity of their judgment. I regard it of kindred character with somi' of the Jesuitical writings on the subject of morals. "Yours truly, •' Geo. Duffield." " [A few words in the connuencement of thenext letter have become illegible ; the meaning is, tliat he has been en<j:n;ied in the unwelcome taski of i ^Iti* m I ) •&"o" reading the transhition of Swedenborg's treatise on 15G Mil. HAMMOND 8 LETTKK. Itl: 'fornication' and ' eoncul)inaf?e.' T speak of it as an umvelcome tusk. — Siu'ely yon will sympathize with me, and well understand the stateuient. I had, from various sources, received some inthnation of what I might expect ; hut the actual reading of such sentiments exceedingly shocked and disgusted me. As I turned over the polluted pages, I was often reminded of the words of another; — 'Thave touched pitch and am defiled.' The moral influence of these treatises cannot hut he mischievous in the extreme. For a professeiily relujioua treatise to apologize for licentiousness under novel and soft names ; and actually to advise certain forms of it, by making great distinctions, where there are no differences, is strange conduct. And that its strangeness and absurdity are not at once seen, and loathed by all who have enjoyed the pure light of the Bible, is perhaps still more strange. It can be explained however by the l)ook, which declares that ' men love darkness rather than light, ])ecause their deeds are evil.' I would write more at large, but for want of time. "Yours sincerely, "H. L. Hammond. " Detroit, March 18th 1847." "Dkar Sir, and Brottikr. — I have read with care, the treatise on Scortatory love ; and in com- pliance with your request, for an expression of my opinion as to its moral character and tendency, I freely state tliat both are decidedly bad — its general dissemination could not fali to produce r(>sults damjeroHs to socirtij : and especially tlie youth be- MR. BAITGHMAN S LETTER. 157 i \ coming familiar with its views, and embracing them as true, mxiai nccesmrllff become corrupt therc- }>y. Should the views therein inculcated on con- cubinage, become common, they would inevitably break ap the vert/ fomuhdion of society and domestic order, and brint/ disgrace and ruin upon families. Its justifiable .^rounds of concubinage may occur in any family, and at any time ; and I might ask with propriety, what lady of sensibility and refine- ment would unite her destiny with any man, subject to such misfortune or caprice. With regard to your remaining questions, I should say, that the production of such a treatise, must in itself be fatal to all claims of the author to inspiration. "Yours very n-spectfully, " J. A. Bauqhman." l>ear Sir, I have examined the pleasures of in- sanity concerning Scortatory love, and am free to t^xpress, that it is a work wholly unlit for the public eye. Its tendency is of a eorrnptiiuj and demoraliz- ing character ; and the diffusion of such principles mustl>c regarded in the light of agreat moral calamity . As it regards the author's claim to inspiration, nothing could be more absurd, it is blasphemous to say that the God of inlinite purity and holiness, i\\ciiii^i\\m\iQ'\\A(;i-,>iomanifeiitUi<)bsceneandlicentious. I cannot better express my opinion on this whole subject, than in the language of the Tiev. John Wesley,— Who illuminated either Jacob Behmen, or Baroii Swedenborg, to contradict these things, (the Scrii)tnres)? It could not hv the God of the holy prophits, for lie is always consistent witli ' m ;' U. 1)' 1 i 158 Mil. DAVIDSON S LKTTEK. Himself ; — certainly it was tlio spirit of darkness. And indeed " tlie light that was in them was dark- ness," while they lahored to kill the never-dying worm, and to put out the unquenchahle ih'e. And with what face can any, that profess to ])elieve the Bible give any countenance to these dreamers, — tJiat filtlui dreamer in imrticuhir, who tales care to provide harlots, in stead of fire and brimstone for devils, and damned spirits.'' I am, Dear Sir, Yours in the bonds of a free and holy gospel. J. H. Davidson." Of course, in whatever light we might view it, this was a severe trial to imdergo. Here were five of the most inthiential Clergymen of Detroit, — Mr. Inglis, of the Baptist Church, — Dr. Dutlield, of the Presbyterian, — Mr. Hammond, of the Congrega- tional, — Mr. Baughman, of the Methodist ; and Mr. Davidson, the presiding elder of tlie Methodist Church ; with John Wesley added ; — all combined and arrayed against us ; determined if i)()ssible to crush and exterminate us ! and we so few in num- bers, and having so little influence. Besides, the assault was so unfair; it took Jalse ground, as if it was the true firound ; it dealt almost altogether in invective and appeals to ])rejudice, endeavoring to excite alarm by making a charge of immorality and licentiousness. It is true no effort was made to sustain these charges, because that would have shewn their falsity ; and the few garbled and mis- tated extracts which Mr. Inglis made from the Book in question, although really having no bear- ing on the Doctrine of life, as taught by Swedenborg, yet from the manner of their presentation to those. ; t ' ■'^:^-^.^jt A REPLY REFUSED. 150 ! i as ignorant, of his teachings, as the}- knew most of those who wouhl read them, and their invectives, would be ; would not fail, as they also knew, to poison the public mind against us. Well, what was to be done '? The same friends again met, and held a council as before, and it was again resolved that I should be requested to write a reply for publication, which I accordingly did, and pre- sented to them, and it mot their full approbation. Mr. Lyon was also, as before, deputied to wait on Mr. Inglis, and request him to publish it in his paper, but this he again positively refused to do ; so the same arrangements were made as before ; it was published in the Daily and "Weekly Adccr- tiser ; and in the Daily and Weekly Free Press ; and the next week copied into the two Ann Arbor newspapers ; and extra copies printed in tract form for distribution. The following is a copy of the second reply to Rev. James Inglis' on the writings of Swedenborg, as published in the il//('// ///a// Chris- tian Herald of March 15, 1847 ; together with Let- ters from four Clergymen. Both replies having been refused insertion in the Herald. Detroit, March 17, 1847. " Gird up thy loins, and speak unto them, all that I command thee : be not dismaved at their faces, lest 1 confound thee before them. For behold, I have! made thee, this day, a defeuced cit.y, and an iron pillar, and brazen walls against the whole land. And they shall fight against thee, but they shall not prevail against thee; for I am with thee, saith the Lord, to deliver thee." — Jer. i., 17, 18, 19. m «p 1()0 THE REFUSED REPLY. To THE Editor of the Michigan Christian Herald : Sir — Again have you rendered it necessary to i(!ply to you, and unwelcome as tlie task is, I am induced to undertake it. I would ask of your sense oiJiiHtice, that you give this rejoinder an insertion in your next paper, but that experience has made thisa very doubtful ground to rely u})on. Still, it is right to give you the choice of publication ; it may be that expediency will dic- tate what higher claims cannot effect ! It is painful — it is humiliating — to see men fill- ing so high and responsible stations, so unwilliiKj • to do right, or so incupuhlc of seeing what right is. In the commencement of your last article you say, ** While we were conscious of having made a mild representation of the case, rather tlian an exagger- ated estimate of its enormities, we were, from the nature of it, shut out from an opportunity of a justification." And then, because you " dare not assume the responsibility"' of presenting "the pol- luted and polluting principles of this system," you will " submit to the public, the testimony of well known citizens of Detroit, to the character of these principles, so soon as they shall have an oportunity of forming an opinion of the work — >mch testimony as the friends of Swedoihortj nill not attempt to gain- say T' Did you know so little of the nature of man, — of the first principles of jurisprudence, that we should not object to an exparte statement like this ? — a jury pannelled by yourself— composed of men as hostile to our doctrines as you are ! Yet, such testimony, ice should not attempt to (jainsay ! Why 4 > \ DISINGENUOUS CONDUCT. 161 . did you not, in plain terms, call us imbeciles ? It would have classed well with the other vituperous epithets you have applied to us. And, now, Sir, you have not only selected your jury, hut with more than legal skill, you h&\e select- ed the evidence. It appears that you have cut up a hook, and taken out of it that which you supposed would answer your purpose hest, to secure a verdict in your favor ; and you deemed this necessary, even after you had chosen your own judges ! In a work consisting of 438 pages, on Conjugial and Scortatory Love, you have taken ahout a 100 pages, and sent round to such persons as you thought would condemn it ; the notices of which we shall duly consider, but first in reference to yourself. You say that you feel " conscious of having made a mild representation of the case." I would respect- fully ask then, what a secerc one would be ? But our ground of objection is, that it is neither true nor faithful. As if the inspired penman had in prophetic gaze, seen your conclave performing their so " un- welcome task," he says, " their tongue is an arrow shot out ; it speaketh deceit," for they have taken up a reproach to slay the innocent ; but the word of the Lord hath gone forth, and "the scorner is consumed, and all that watch for iniquity are cut off ; that make a man an offender for a word, and lay a snare for him that reproveth in the gate, and turn aside the just, for a thing of nought." Before Inoticeyour misstatements, and misrepresentations, permit me to ask why, supposing it were true, that Swedenborg allowed all manner of fornication and I ' :f ri n ^i 162 COMMANDMENTS OMITTED. adultery, and approved it most highly, why are you the first to object ? Is it held in so much disrepute among your body ? Do any of your clergy ever read to your congregations this command from the Decalogue. "Thou shall not commit adultery?" Or do any of the four clergymen ■whose condemnatory epistles you have published ? How is this, Sir, that neither you nor they deliver this command- ment of the Lord to your people ? Can it be because, that if they read this portion of the Divine law, they must also read that which says, " Thou shall not hear false witness against thy neighbor.'' Let us glance hastily at some of your descriptions of our unhappy and abandoned state ! I perceive that you not only select your own subject, cut up our books, to present it, and choose your own arbitra- tors ; but you also ask questions about our doctrines, ajid answer them yourself: thus you say, what is the character of the Swedenborgian heaven ? And then instead of showing its character, answer that it is contiguous to the Mahometan Heaven, and that "readers of the Alcoran would, perhaps, fail to see any good reason why they should be in any way separated." Perhaps I do not know what idea you meant to convey by this relationship, but it is certainly not true. Swedenborg teaches that in the spiritual world, nearness and remoteness are according to the acknowledgment and confession which are made of Jesus Christ as the only Lord ; therefore ai in the old Christian Church, no such acknowledg- ment is made ; that since the establishment of the OENDERLESS ANOELB. 163 New Church, new heavens have been formed which are the inmost of all — and that the order of their circumferences are as follows: — Ist, the lieformed — 2nd, the Papists — 8rd, the Mahometans, and 4th, in the extreme circumference, the Gentiles, (L. J., No. 48, and in the Cont. of do 08.) Thus, though you say the Mahometans are outside the "Sweden- bor^^ian heaven," in such a way as to imply the immediate proximity, you omitted to say that the Eeformed and the Papists come in between ! But, yet apprehending that this might not fully serve your purpose, you next present, as if it were some- thing shocking, indeed, and as an almost incredible fact, that " distinction of sex remains after death, and consequently the love proper to man in his translated state ; and with astonished emphasis you say, " And this is heaven." It may seem sin- gular to you that Swedimborg, the prophets, and the angels who appeared to them — disciples, and " penmen of the sacred Word," should all have agreed upon this, that an{ieh have sex, and that the human race, in becoming inliabltants of the Spirit- ual world, are angel men, or angel women, or male and female devils I — but could they all have erred so widely ! Yet, they nowhere recognize the idea, as conveyed by you, that they become epicene ! And now, that you attirm it, its truth is not the lees doubtful. Let us try it by a practical illustration. Young says, I • Ml "Angels aro men of a suiierior kind — Angels are nien in lighter habit clad. 164 THE SEX OF ANGELS. i'ij But by the negation of sex it would read : Angels are thingi of a anperior kiud — AHjj'els are things iu lighter habit clad." And the same change would have to be effected in the version of the Scripture ; thus it would l)e, " and the thhu/ that stood among the myrtle trees." ** The angel that talked with me, went forth, and another angel went out to meet it." And not only for man must we use the word thing, or some neuter substitute, but for woman also, thus, "This is a thimi that sitteth in the midst of the ephah." " Then lift I up mine eyes, and looked, and behold there came out two things, and the wind was in their wings" — see Zech. chs. 1, 2, 3, & 5, Sec, Sec. And how far from recognizing the truth of your assumption, must John have been, for when intro- mitted into the Spirit world, he classes the angels into male and female, never seeming to suppose that angels have no sex, and should be described by a neuter pronoun ! Thus, he saw an angel with a rainbow " upon/<<5 head, and his face was, as it were, the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire ; and he had in his hand a little book open ; and he set his right foot on the earth"— (Rev. 10, 1, 2.) Do you suppose, Sir, that he was in error, thus to describe anr/els, as having heads, faces, hands, and ,/eet and in always using the male and female pronouns ? Did he really believe that angels have no sex, when yet, not only he, but all the sacred writers make mention of them as male and female ; and by one, Joshua the high priest, was seen in SEX AFTER DEATH. 165 the spiritual world, standing before the angel of the Lord, clothed with filthy garments, &c. (Zech.3.) And in the Apocalypse John, describes an angel that ho talked with, who said, " I am thy fellow servant, and of thy brethren, that have the testimony of Jesus " — (Rev. 10, 10.) Thus, Sir, do we see the holy Scriptures teach, with Swedenborg that man's identity is, and must be preserved, or he can- not exist at all, for the very ground of his being is destroyed if your supposition is true. But do not your own doctrines teach it? Do they not affirm that man is raised in the very same body which was put off at death, and consequently has the same personality, and conscious identity, the same affection and thouglit, indeed that he is the same, and not another ? How then, can it be possible, that he is neither male, nor female } Only consider in what trouble such a view must plac© you. And yet, your indignant emotions seem awakened at the idea of husband and wife being re united in another and butter world, and enjoy- ing the chaste and blessed delight of conjugial love, for this seems to you so altogether indecorous, that it shocks you to convey to your pages such "pol- luted principles." Did YOU, Sir, never ascend so far out of a dog- matic theology, as to enquire on rational and phil- osophical grounds, what would constitute identity in another world ? Have you supposed man seg- mented, cut up, as you have done our books ! a portion of his being abstracted from him, that he becomes a formless conjictiire, or an '^organized noth- i li iiWii :ii7iiri-im 166 SPIRITUAL ORGANIZATION. kl I. \ I r ing f" Your clear and rational elucidation of the nature, form, and identity of sjaritual being, or pBychological existence, would be as interesting, as it seem::' necessary. Is it not beaause you do not realize the fact that the spiritual world is not merely composed of ab- stract non-entities, but real, living, spiritual and BMbstantial forms, that you object to our author's testimony? He reveals it as a continuance of life, in anoth'3r and better world. Man is man still, and woman is woman still ; and their affections and thoughts which made them what they are, viust remain, or they can have no conscious identity ! And if this be so, they must tJiink the same, and feel the same. If it be true that man's state is fixed at death, whatever was the state of his love, or of his understanding, it must continue so Jor ever. Noth- ing can be more puzzling than to dispute it. for it is attempting to contradict self-evident ^'acts ; and notliing but a perverted theology could ever have denied it. Therefore man would talk about the things he loved, as well after he had put off his house of flesh as before, whether they were good or whether they w'^re evil. And though you profess to make quotations from Swedenborg's writings in reference to the conver- sation of novitiates and others in the spiritual world (without reference,) I can find no such words. It is true that 1 can find some that I suppose to be those you intend to quote, but so singularly altered, that I acknowledge it to be conjectural. Thus you Bay in one place, that an angel says "in heaven we WHAT MAKES BEAUTY. 167 t love Tirgins for their beauty, and the elegance of their manners, and we love them intensely and chastely." Now, the nearest approach I can find to this is in Conj. Love, 55, which is a description of what chaste conjugial love is, ** free from every idea of lasciviousness." And in another place you tell us, or rather you should tell, the idea of three persons just departed from the world, on the "origin of the beauty of the female sex;'" the first affirming that love was its origin, and that its affection going forth into the looks, stamped them into corresponding forma, I therefore (he said), conclude that love forms beauty into a likeness of itself. The second maintained that "wisdom is the origin of beauty:" who sum- med up his argument thus: "In a word, wisdom is as the light or splendor of fire which strikes the eyes, and as it strikes them, forms beauty." Whilst the third maintained that " love by means of wis- dom, forms that beauty ; and wisdom from love re- ceives it ;" and also described how love was the origin of red (or warm) colors, and wisdom of white (or cold) colors, and that these principles were the origin or cause of the variations of color in the face, for said he, "love is red from its fire, and wisdom is white from its liglit." — (C. L. 381, et seq. 9.) And such conversation in the spiritual world you are pleased to consi.ler as improper and inde- corous ! If they had said as much before they crossed the " narrow sea," you actually alfirm, that they would have been, (i. e. if meeting their just deserts), " hissed out of the Lyceum of a Lunatic ill l-li \ H ' M: 168 LIFE IN THE SPIBITUAL WOBLD. Asylum !" (well, perhaps this was better said than you intended.) Lunatics only, would hiss at such Bentiments as these. In Hades at least, with kinder feelings, our author says "when the third had spoken, the assembly clapped their hands and shouted, he has conquered." Why should it be thought incredible with you, that these things should be ? Is it not because all your ideas of the spirit world are so loose and vague ? Swedenborg commenced this work (Conj. Love) by saying, " I foresee that many who read the relations immediate- ly following, and those annexed to the chapters will believe that they are inventions of the imagina- tion ; but I assert in truth, that they were not in- vented, but truly done and seen ; nor seen in any state of the sleeping mind, but in full wakefulness." He also presents the ideas which different people have of the joys of heaven, one of which is thus expressed. ** The joys of heaven and its eternal happiness are nothing olse than the perpetual glorification of God ; a never ceasing festival of praise, and the blessedness of divine worship with Bongs and jubilee ; " &c. And they were let into this state, and after tico daya, they began to weary and feel uneasy, and, (although very disrespectful perhaps you would say, and deserving of being hissed,) said, " end your discourses, for our ears are stunned, your words are no longer distih^j lished, and the very sound oi your voices becomes pain- ful;" and leaving their seats they rushed out: " The priests hereupon followed them and clung close beside them, teaching, praying, sighing, and I \ THE BODY THE FORM OF THE SOUL. 169- i 1 Baying, celebrate the solemn festival, and glorify God, and sanctify yourselves," il-c, (9.) How would the editor of the Christian Herald supj^ose such conduct should be punished ? But we pass on, that we may notice your remark in reference to the love of the sex. *' According to him [E. S.] distinction of sex remains after death, love of the sex, and conjugial love remain," &c. This seems to disturb you considerably sir, but if thev do not remain, what becomes of them ? The questio'^ again returns, what is an inhabitant of the spirit world ? Be assured sir, that reason and revelation teach us, that man is such as his God has made him, and intented that he should be, as to the organism of his frame, and whether in the natural world or the spiritual, he is not the less human. Neither does distinction of sex originate in the body, but in the mind ,- the body is })ut the effigy of the nifections and thoughts, or rather the organ- ized form thereof. Thus our author says, that in heaven "there are also virgins and youths, virgins of such beauty, that they may be called beauties in its form ; and youths of such morality that they mav be called moralities in its form,'' And when some novitiates enquired if love of the sex were there, *' the angelic spirits answered, your love of the sex is not given there, l)ut the angelic love of the sex, which is chaste, and wholly free from the allurement of lust." At which they said, and it almost seems as if the words had been written for your edification. *' If a love of the sex is given ^ i Si 111 M \ m mmmSim m. 170 CONJUOIAL LOVE. which is without alhirement, what is then the love of the sex ?" They did not see that it was heaven- ly love, a conjunction of affection and thought from intimate to ultimates, but ** when they thought of this love, they lamented and said, how empty is the joy of heaven ! What young man can then wish for heaven ? Is not such a love barren and ■devoid of life?" Here, thon, we sec that the very kind of love that you suppose Swedenborg to teach as being in the spiritual world ; Swedenborg de- scribes some new-comers as lamenting because it was not there ! And when they repudiated this pure and heaven- ly love " the angelic spirit replied with indignation. You are wholly ignorant what a chaste love of the sex is, because yourselves are not yet chaste." " Think more deeply — consider the matter well, and you will perceive that your love of the sex is a love extra conjugial, and that conjugial love is quite another thing ; the latter being distinct from the former, as wheat is from chaff, or rather as the human is from the bestial." Such a love "breathes after an eternal union, which is when two are one flesh."— (C. L. 44.) Proceed we now to notice the criticisms of your ecclesiastical brethren, wlio have lent their aid to crush, if possible, this iiltby dreamer ! " But they know not what they do, and they do not even un- derstand what they say. " Must we actually stoop (you ask,) at this day, and in this country to dis- cuss the inspiration of such a man ; " and very con- tentedly reply, " we do not believe it can ever coma 1 1 HOW THE WICKED LIVE. 171 to that." No, sir ; there is a more summary method — one that doubtless will be much easier, viz : ridi- cxile, abuse, slander and evil speaking ; and of this method your present efifusions would afford no mean testimony. And whilst you shrink with well described horror from the descriptions which our author gives of the dreadful condition of the hells, 3 "^u have no hesitation in presenting? the most cal- umnious aspersions, as a veritable statement of the tendency of our author's writings ! If you could have stooped to discuss this matter, you would, instead of proceeding with such loud denunciations, have first replied to the positions presented in my former letter. But as you did not I will again call your atten jn thereto, trust- ing that you will yet see, that though it may be an act of humiliation on your part to " stoop," to re- ply to legitimate argument, you will in the end discover, that it has a better effect, than the harshest denunciations, even though they may be uttered by a thousand voices. I before said ; " Suppose an infidel wore to object to the truth of the Scripture, because of the conduct of Lot's two daurjhters, (Gen. ch. 19; from verse 81 to end.) also 8th verse of same chap. — and Abraham's inter- course with Hagar — or Samson, (Judges ch. 16, v. 1,) and Amos ch. 7, v. 17 — or Hosea, ch. 1, v. 2, &c., [to which might be added such narrative as in Ezek. chs. IG and 28. Then how would you rea- son ? Whatever your answer may be, it will apply to your own position." But you have given no answer at all, and seem I 1 172 HOW MEN JUDGE. m \<^0P f ■ to think it beneath you to do bo. Yet if you really thought us so contemptible, how is it that you deemed it necessary to engage so much additional aid to enable you to accomplish your purpose ? What a waste of power to crush a worm ! Did you all feel that the subject was not worthy of an argu- ment ? If so, how pitiable is your delusion, — yet judging from your several letters it would really seem so. And yet you might have known that Clergymen of the first talent, reputation and virtue, and in no respect inferior to yourselves, and from your own religious bodies in this country and in ■ England ; as well as laymen, deep read, erudite and learned, and of pure and blameless lives, and some of the most talented writers of the age, are ardent and affectionate receivers of the heavenly doctrines of the New Jerusalem. Yet you, gentle- men, after having read this sundered extract of a few pages of the voluminous writings of this master mind, on the licenses allowed to the insane ; you quietly sit down, and pronounce your judgment with as much complacency as if you were compe- tent to judge ! — Now, gentlemen, [and I use that word for obvious reasons,] I call upon you by all the regard you have to truth and candor to shew cause for your censure. We accuse you of having done us injustice ; and, outraged charity, like the voice of thy brothers' blood, will repeat that cry, till restitution be fully made. And in preferring this request, let it always be remembered, that the trea- tise on scortatory love is 7iot the law oj life for Christ- ian men and ivomen, but is provided for the benefit S i EVILS TOLERATED. 173 of those who do not acknowledge the Christian law; it is written for those who live in the wanton indul- gence of unhridled lust : that wliero men are so hrutal as to acknowledge no Divine Law, thny may be led by means adapted to their state to shun their evil courses, by the very faithfulness of their por- traiture and see their damning guilt. To present tli^ Christian law to men whose indulged passions have made them insane, is a mockery; and their brutal laugh reveals its im potency. On this prin- ciple, the apostle Paul did not require the rude con- verts from among the Gentiles to keep the Jewish Law — knowing well they could not l)car it, — neither did he ask of them the full requirements of the Christian faith and life, but to these he says, " we gave vo sucJi coinDiandincnt.'" (Acts 1B:29.) And the Lord teaches that because of the hardness of their hearts y" the Jews also were allowed to do things^ that were not. so in the beginning. All the providence of the Lord is merciful, and, in accommodation to man's estate, he hath prepared a ladder of ascent ; and whilst the lowest rounds come down to man's depraved nature, the highest steps will elevate him to heavenly happiness — and the angels of the Lord are ever ascending and des- cending upon that ladder of life, to bring man, by means of permitted evils, of a less degree of guilt, to a pure and spotless life — '* And, as we can bear the sight. He shews his face in clearer hght ;" Still, whilst man is in evils, milder or of deeper guilt, all the consequences proper to such actions '% ]:1? I i 174 LKS8 EVILS PERMITTED. 1,-t 11; ;i: ,1 must follow ; for every cause produces its own effect, and must do so. Adultery, theft, murder, false witness, &c., Sec, are all violations of the Divine Laws, and must bring with their performance their attendant punishments : Yet as in civil law, the ofTonce of manslaughter is not bo great as that of wilful murder, or petty larceny as that of burglary, or highway robbery, so, therefore, the punishment is less. And who would not rather, where there is no alternative, but a choice of evils ; who would not rather choose the less than the greater ? On this principle the hord permits many things to be done in the world, which are nevertheless evil, because thereby greater calamiticis can be avoided. So every wise man should see that where perpe- tual inchrietij cannot be avoided, that the occasion- al and limited use of ardent spirits is a much less evil. And is this not the reason why the Lord commanded the Jews to do many things, that in themselves, purely considered, were evils, because by permitting these, the mind was weaned, and gradually alienated from sins of far deeper enor- mity ? Those who reject this mild and judicious course, must be answerable for the consequences that issue, and they are neither light nor trifling. This is the economy of the Divine Providence ; the practice of all good men in all ages ; the voice of reason, and the teaching of Eevelation. It is a principle true in spiritual, moral, civil and political life. It is only in the questionable orthodoxy of modern dogmatic theology that it is denied, and I TO PREVENT GREATER ONES. 17& there only theoretically. Let us again glance for a moment at the approved practices of men. In physics, when the eye is injured or diseased, does not the wise physician prescribe that the li(jht be excluded, or admitted but in a very limited degree ; or when the body is wounded is not the air shut out, lest it should irritate and inflame the injury? And at other times are not poisons given for medi- cine, because they are l)etter adapted to the vitiat- ed condition of the body ? But who complains then ? Yet is not the light good — and the air good, and healthy food better than poisonous drugs ? Yet does not every one see that the laws of order require that in such cases these substitutes be preferred, m accommodation to that diseased state ? This in- deed is seen to be the only means of restoring to health. So also in political economy, it has ever been found necessary to tolerate lesser evils, to avoid greater ; instead of allowing a wide and indiscrimi- nate range to civic disorders, to narrow them down to limited boiDularies, where they can more easily be eradicated. Does not this city afford a practical illustration of this principle ; when in accordance with the spirit of your favourite theology, the cor- poration thought to compel men into sobriety, by refusing to grant licenses for the sale of intoxieat - ing liquors, was the evil lessened ? In all probabil- ity it was increased, and entailed upon it the vio- lation of a corporate law ; and has not the impolicy of this act, since been recognized '? Thus, the granting licences for the sale of ardent nimf ! i| ii 176 WHY EVILS ARE PERMITTED. ! I .i i spirits, is seen to be as necessary, as for the Jews to be permitted to do many things whicli, abstract- ly considered, were not good. And who cannot see, that amongst the depraved and vile, the ex- crescences of humanity, who would prey upon the innocence of maidens, and the chastity of wives, who know no law ))ut their unbounded and craving passion, and with unbridled lust, range the face of society, and phindcr where they list ; who, wo ask, cannot see it were better that such lepers limit their indulgence to some paramour, rather than domestic relations be thus jirofaned and polluted ; when, only by such allowances, the greater evil can be avoided ? And if any one should yet deny it, then we can only say, that should his own domes- tic hearth be thus invaded by some such human fiend, he might learn, perchance, too late, and bit- terly, the truth of Swedenborg's teaclnng. Still, we affirm, that whilst these things are thus necessarily permitted, to lead man from the com- mission of more terrible offences, they cannot, even in their mildest forms, be done with 'nnpunity, they must and will be punished — but the punishment will be moderated to the offence. No confirmed violator of the laws of chastity, or any law of the divine order, can find a home in heaven — (see Kev. xxi. 27, and xxii. 15.) Bui their punishment in hell will be according to the nature of their crimes. Let us now return, to notice what vou have said of the tendency of Swedenborg's writings, after reading this little book, which pictures forth the permissions, to those in the moral Lazar house, '&• i' ji; I BUT GOOD ALWAYS REQUIRED. 177 i the iinconfined lunatics, who, in the pleasures of their ihsaniti/, roam over the face of the earth. Suppose some strangers, from a foreigu hind, should come to this country, and visit the jails, the penitentiaries, insane asylums, and hospitals ; and then report the code of laws and treatment of the patientsi, there adopted, (in the laws of this Re- public, and inter from tlience, the character of its inhaljitants, would you not feul that justice and truth had been violently outraj^ed ? And yet, this is precisely the course that five dis- tinguished clergymen, in the city of Detroit, have adopted in reference to the writings of the Hon. Emanuel Swedenborg ! and those who receive hia testimony, are indirectly charged with impurity and insanity, with loving ''darkness rather than light, because their deeds are evil,'' &c. Had there been anything like argument, or rea- son in these communications,- there might have been something that might have reached the public understanding; but unless our opponents can deal in something better than harsh denunciations, fire, brimstone, devils, and damned spirits, with which your talented array of writers conclude their male- dictions, they will find that they will produce but little effect on such minds as have already broken the shackels of prejudice, and allowed the mind to reason. But it is saddening to think that all the pure, holy, and heart-Hearching princii)les of our venerated author, should all have been overlooked, and nothing seen but this dismembered treatise ! What could there have been in it so congenial to M IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 I.I 1.25 IK lilM " ilM |||||Z2 12.0 11111= U III 1.6 6' .^, ^ y}. ^ o% /} ^l. 9..% ..;•• '^^ %%" V // O^,. m. Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 872-4503 .<' c^ 4!p C/j W ^ i^. '4 I I «f^ ^m 178 CONTINUED OPPOSITION. your minds ? And why, forsaking all else, did your genius lead you to this ? You say, you have "touched pitch, and are defiled," — did it then defile you so quickly ! Is there in your composition any secret affinity for pitch, that it should so soon pollute ? Of the Lord's disciples we learn, " they shall take up serpents, and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them.'' But though most of our New Church friends have this work, (on Scortatory love), they very seldom read it; to them, happily, it has hut few attractions; it is intended, as we have shown, for another class of persons, such, as your preachings, perhaps, might never reach ; or who could not, and would not, try to step at once from their abandoned loves, to a life of holiness. In conclusion, we ask you to refrain from this persecuting spirit, and if you speak of Sweden- borg's writings — first study them, — and then do them justice. Eespectfully yours, George Field. After this, nothing more appeared in the Christian Herald against Swedenboig, or the New Church. Whatever eiforts may have been made in opposition thereto, were of a less public character. But we were not to be let alone, for during tlie delivery of the last Course of Lectures as above stated. Dr. Duffield delivered a Lecture against us on the "Modern Phase of Infidelity," and Mr. Stebbins, the Universalist Minister, was desirous of having a discussion with me, on the subject of "Hell;" but I declined. Then, shortly after, I received a letter from Mr. J. J. Moss, a Minister of A NEW ANTAGONIST. 179 ' the " Christian," (or Campbelhte) Church, inviting me to a public discussion with him ; — this I also de- clined. And soon after the following handbill, in very large letters, was posted all over town : " TO THE PUBLIC. Having been informed in the Country, and in the City, that Mr. Field, of the New Jerusalem Church, in this place, had invited open discussion or investigation, I opened a cor- respondence with him, in which he disclaimed all intention of giving a challenge for a public discuB- sion ; and altogether declined entering into one. Attention is therefore called to the following Course of Lectures ; at each Course, said correspondence will be read, with some remarks thereupon. Yours respectfully, J. J. Moss. Religious Notice ! A Course of Lectures on the Doctrines of the New Church, with a special reference to the eight ques- tions proposed for discussion in the above corres- pondence, — will be delivered by J. J. Mobs, for- merly of Cincinnati, 0., in the Hall formerly occupied by the New Church, Republican Block, Jeflersou Avenue ; to commence on Saturday evening 30th, P. M.; and each evening next week, till closed ; and Mr. Field is respectfully invited to attend, and reply, if he wishes. Detroit, 30th Jan., 1817." Well, I thought I would go and hear how this redoubtable champion would annihilate what- ever might be left of us, after the assault of our more ponderous assailants. I found the room tolerably well filled, and saw quite a pile of New Church books, upon the desk, which Mr. Moss had borrowed to let his audience see that he knew 180 LIBRARY IN DETROIT. there were such books, although it became very manifest that he had never read them. After repeating some of the stale, and oft refuted objections to the New Church, and shewing how incompetent he was to lecture upon a subject on which he was almost entirely ignorant ; he invited me to reply. I had no wish to say anything, and did not ex- pect to, but being thus publicly called upon. I rose and said a few words to the effect that if he had been acquainted with the contents of the books thus displayed to the audience, he never would have said the things he did. I made him acknowledge that he had not read them ; and really knew nothing of what he was proposing to explain. And so Mr. Moss subsided. But other matters of more interest to the prospects of the New Church in Detroit were meantime going on. On the 25th of January, 1847, a meeting was held to commence the operation of a New Church Library, and a Constitution was adopted, and officers elected : there were forty shareholders. During the past year a copy of Clowes' affectionate address to the Clergy was sent to every known Clergyman within the Association ; and between three and four hundred dollars worth of New Church Books were sold in Detroit within that year ; and the third Course of Lectures was still in progress. On Friday, February 5th, 1847, the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Michigan and N. Ind. Association I FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING. 181 ! held its session in Detroit, in the Hall, in Republi- can Block. At this meeting there were present Mr. and Mrs. A. Silver, and Mr. Jabez Fox, of Marshall ; Mr. Jacob Silver, of Cassapolis ; Mr. Robt. Children, Senr. and Robt. Children, Jr. of Flat Rock, Honble. J. Allen, and G. Coraelius, of Ann Arbor, Mr. Geo. Bigelow, and Mr. and Mrs. Perley Hale, of Pontiac ; Mr. Eli H. Day, and Mr. and Mrs. Hurlburt, of Springfield (Oakland Co.); Mr. C. Merriman, of Battle Creek; Mr. and Mrs. D. V. Bell, Lucius Lyon, P. S. Titus ; Mr. and Mrs. Burnham, Dr. and Mrs. J. Ellis ; Dr. Wheaton, E. U. Blake, Mr. and Mrs. A. Chope, E. Chope ; Mr. and Mrs. J. R. Dorr, Mrs. R. Dorr, Geo. Dorr, Mr. and Mrs. J. L Herrick, Mr. and Mrs. A. T. Hall, Mr. and Mrs. Burpee, G. W. Thayer, Mr. Whitcomb, Wm. Bell, Mr. McCartney, myself, and others, of Detroit. Communications were also received and read from Edwardsburg, Saline, Truago,* and Jonesville, Mich., and Goshen, Ind. The Sacrament of Baptism was administered, after the morning service, on the Sabbath, to Mr. Chaa. L. Merriman, Mr. John Allen, Mr. Martin W. Burpee, Mrs. Diana Burpee, Mr. Amos T. Hall, Mrs. Lucy Hall, Mrs. R. Dorr, and to four children. In the afternoon the Holy Sup[)er was adminis- tered to twenty-two persons. The Services, morn- ing and evening, were attended by large audiences. The Report of this session of the Association says, " A social meeting was held at the house of • Now Trenton. rff F 1" ^ai I li I 182 A TIME OP REST. Mr. J. R. Dorr, on Saturday evening, at which were present a larfi;er number of New Church people than ever before assembled at one place in Michigan ; the meeting was eminently happy and refreshing ; and all, we think were encouraged to look forward with hope to the better time that is yet to be, — to new states of refreshing from on high, when Jerusalem shall be a praise, and a joy, in the whole earth." After this we had a time of peace, and I also of rest. The Church continued to increase and grow, and iti prospects everywhere within the As^socia- tion appeared to be most encouraging : a Commit- tee had been appointed to make efforts to sustain one or more Missionaries to be actively employed ; but the effort had failed for want of pecuniary support ; and from exi)erience, I had found that often I received but little more than sufficient to pay my travelling expenses ; and sometimes not even that : thus I was obliged to seek such employ- ment as would enable me to support myself and children. I therefore continued in Detroit this year (1847,) in the Surveyor General's office, but preaching and lecturing regularly on the Sabbath, as before, and as we now had the use of the U. S. Court House, rent free, and my services were gratuitous, I was in hopes that sufficient inoney could be raised to purchase a Lot and erect there- on a small Temple for our use. But although I made a strenuous effort to do this, I was not suc- cessful. During this year I went to Pontiac, and on Saturday evening, an^l Sunday morning and THE CHRISTUN VISITOR. 188 evening, July 3rd and 4th, I lectured andjpreached there, in the Universalists' Church. And on Saturday and Sunday, August 7th and 8th, I went to Marshall, to attend a Quarterly meeting, where I also lectured and preached to good audiences, at Mechanics' Hall, and administered the Holy Supper. Next day I went to Battle Creek and delivered a lecture there in the Quaker Meeting House, and from thence returned to Detroit. In the month of October an attack was made on the New Church by the Rev. J. V. Watson, in the Christia^i Visitor, a Methodist paper, pubHshed at Adrian, to which I replied : and this produced a second article in opposition to our Doctrines, to which also I sent a reply : but it was refused insertion ! These articles were headed "A chapter on New Revelations;" and were written by the Rev. S. D. Symonds, of Detioit, In consequence of this refusal to insert my reply, I had the whole of the four articles published as a Tract, entitled " Correspondence between a Methodist Minister and a Minister of the New Church, respecting Swedenborg, and the Doctrines of the New Jerusalem." As soon as this appeared Mr. Symonds called on me, and wanted me to permit him to append to it the scurrilous remarks of Mr. Wesley concerning Swedenborg, and also some additional remarks of his own ; which I declined. Mr. S. then published his ap- pendix in the form of a small Tract, entitled "Mr. Wesley's views of Baron Swedenborg, and hia writings, with Notea, <kc., by S. D. S." Mr. S. also desired to have a public controversy with me on 184 A NEW SOCIETY IN DETROIT. ( • I the subject ; but I did not agree to it. At that time Mr. Symonds was very severe against Sweden- borg, and his Doctrines ; but since then, has not only become a receiver of them, but advocates them, in a periodical of which he is the Editor in San Francisco, entitled " The wav of Life." * To- wards the close of this year Mr. A. Silver, (who was then, and had for some time past been living at Marshall), wrote a letter to the President of the Convention (Rev. T. Worcester), respecting the course then being pursued by himself, Mr. Jabez Fox, and Mr. Henry Weller, of Lecturing in various places on the Doctrines of the New Church, and holding stated meetings for worship, without ordi- nation, license, or other authority, on the ground of a present necessity, in the absence of sufficient Ministerial Labor ; and not from a belief that it is the orderly and proper way in which to proclaim the Heavenly Doctrines of the New Jerusalem ; on which ground, it seems to have met the approba- tion of Mr. Y/orcester. This letter is published in the N. J. Mag. for Feb. 7, 1848; Mr. Strong also had a letter of his published at about the same time, giving a very encouraging account of the man- ner in which the New Church Doctrines are re- ceived in Western Michigan ; Goshen, Ind. &c. It now began to be thought desirable that a New Church Society should be instituted in Detroit, as the one established there in 1839 had long ceased to exist. So, after due deliberation, and finding that there were twelve adult members of the This has since been dis continued. NEW CHURCH QUARTERLY REVIEW. 185 Church residing in the City, they made the usual application to me, to meet them, and, in accordance with the regulations of the General Convention, institute them into a Society of the New Church, which I did on Sunday, the 30th day of January, 1848. The names of those twelve persons, were, Mr. John I. Herrick, Mrs. Rebecca Herrick, — Mr. A. T. Hall, Mrs. Lucy Hall,— Mr. Martin W. Burpee, Mrs. Diana Burpee, — Rev George Field, Mrs. Jane E. Field,— Mr. De Witt C. Whitcomb, — Mr. Edw. U. Blake, — Mrs. Rebecca Dorr, and Mrs. Abby Russell. I was then invited to become the Pastor of the Society ; which invitation I accepted, and was, by a simple form inducted as such. In the Neiv Church Quarterly Review, vol. 1, published in London, Eng., in 1847, there is quite a lengthy historical and statistical account of the New Church in the United States, collated from various sources J in which, after noticing the Society at Goshen (Ind.,) the writer says, " The zeal of the scattered members of the New Church here, is deserving of all commendation. They have united with the receivers in Michigan, in forming an Association, to which the Holy Supper is administered every alternate quarter. These meetings have, thus far, been very interesting and satisfactory. They have been attended, notwithstanding bad roads, by receivers from the distance of 10, 12, 20, 23, and 80 miles : so that persons residing 53 miles apart, have met together on these occasions. In January last, the Presiding Judge of the Circuit, E. M. Chamberlain, with his wife, and m hk '. • i! !i.. l. ■f mm 186 NEW CHURCH IN THE WEST. Ill three children, were baptized by Mr. Stropfj. There are also receivers at the following placeg in this State, — Bristol, Cleveland, Elkhart, Enterprize, Eugene, Evansville, Home, Langhery, Madison, New Albany, Noble, Richmond, and Scipio." In Illinois, the writer also notices the Society in Canton, which he says has 30 members; and the one in Sprinpjfield, which has 11. In Peoria, there are about 17 receivers, besides many others interested, who have been formed into a Society, and have built a " small but comfortable House of Worship, which is already free from the incumbrance of debt." The Chicago Society has 16 members, who meet for worsliip " in the room for- merly occupied as the City Council room." " On the whole, (he says), there is a gradual, though slow spread of the light of the New Church in this part of the West." Then he speaks of the Socie- ties, and incipient societies in Michigan. In Edwardsburg, he says there are 13 members, and the Rev. H. N. Strong is the Minister of this Society, preaching also at other places in the vicin- ity. Detroit, (he continues), the residence of the Rev. G. Field, the presiding Minister of the Asso- ciation, is the seat of an incipient New Church Society, and to which he ministers when not en- gaged elsewhere on missionary duty. Mr. Field has been very successful in making the doctrines known in this region ; and his abilities as a preach- er are so highly regarded, that he has recently been elected Chaplain to the State Senate, during its present session. He now preaches in the Dis- SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING. 187 trict Court room to large and attentive audiences." Then he adds, there are receivers in the following places in the State, viz : — Convis, Dexter, Emmett, Parmington, Genoa, Grand Rapids, Hillsdale, Homer, Iosco, Jackson, Jonesville, Kalamazoo, Lima, Little Prairie Ronde, Marshall, Ontwa, Oxford, Pennfield, Pinckney Rosefield, Smithfield, and St. Joseph." On Friday, the 4th of February, 1848, the sixth annual meeting of the Michigan and N. Ind. Asso- ciation was held in Detroit, — in Mechanics' Hall. There were present at this meeting : from Detroit, 23 persons; from Pontiac, 0; from Marshall, 3; from Niles, 3; from Flat Rock, 3; from Pawpaw, 2; from Jackson, 1; from Saline, 1; from Indepen- dence, 2; from Springfield, 1; from Troy, 1; from Ypsilanti, 1 ; from Ann Arbor, 1 ; and one visitor from New Hampshire. Communications were re- ceived and read from the Goshen and Springfield Societies; also from Lima, Flat Rock, Marshall, Jackson, Edwardsburg, Pittsfield, and Noble Co., Ind.; as also from the Illinois Association. At the previous meeting of the Association a Commit- tee had been appointed to make a report on Mis- sionary labor, that ComraiUee this year presented its Report, the point of it was, as to " who should be employed as public teachers of the Doctrines of the New Cliurch; " and the ground taken was, that the Association, as a constituent of the General Convention, should be amenable to its rules and regulations ; and that they provide for an orderly mode of proclaiming the Doctrines, either by or- 188 WHO SHOULD PREACH. !i dained Ministers, or Licentiates preparing for the Ministry, in accordance with the principles and practices of the Church, as taught in the Word ; and as confirmed hy Swedenl)org ; and that this is necessary, wherever there is an organic Church, to secure it from being misrepreHentod by erroneous or incompetent teachers. Quite a lengthy argument was presented on this subject ; and the recommen- dation of the Committee was, that tlie Missionaries who should be recognized and approved by the Association should be " approved Ministers, or Licentiates, in accordance with the rules and principles above presented." This Report led to a lengthy and animated discussion, when Mr. Murray offered the following Resolution, which was adopted. '* That a Committee of five be ap- pointed, * * to take into consideration the subjects presented in the Report of the Committee * * upon Missionary labor; and enquire whether any, and what measures may be necessary in order to avoid the dangers and disorders supposed to be connected with the practice of Lecturing on New Church Doctrines, by those not licensed for that purpose; and report at the next annual meeting." That Committee consisted of Messrs. Murray, Field, Hans Thielson, Merri- man and Silver. Mr. Herrick then offered the following as a Standing Recommendation, which was referred to the above committee, viz : "Any person wishing to become a public teacher of the Doctrines of the New Church within the States of Michigan and N. Indiana, will apply to the Presid- MISRIONAKY LAnOR. 189 rri- the Ich py Ihe of id- ing Minister for a license ; and if in the opinion of the MinintcrB of tlie AHHOciation, and the ActingCom- mittoe, tho aijplicant in a Huital»le person to become a pul)lic teacher, the Presiding Minister shall license him to preach." Looking back on these proceed- ings after the lapse ot thirty years, it seems to the writer to be a matter of deo]) regret that the above Report on Missionary labors was not at once adopted ; as also the above Standing llecommendation ; liad they been, the Association would have had a very dif- ferent history, and a much more useful one, than unfortunately resulted. At this meeting fifteen dol- lars was raised to purchase New Church Books for the use of the Library in the State Prison at Jack- son. Social meetings were held on Friday and Saturday evenings," which were very fully attended, and highly agreeable." Our meetings for worship, both morning and evening, on the Sabbath, were well attended. Mr. Silver also delivered a Lecture in the afternoon, "in the usual familiar and conversa- tional style of his discourses." On this occasion T baptized two adults and one child ; and administered the Holy Supper to 28 persons. The following year was a remarkable one : — in it there were many things that were encouraging ; and many that in- dicated a change, either for better, or for worse. As I still continued in the Surveyor General's office, I could not be away, as I had been, on Missionary work; though I still continued to preach on every Sabbath in Detroit, but our meetings were much broken up on account of the U. S. Court, being so often, and so long in session, during which time we ■U II 190 FLAT ROCK. could not have the use of their room ; and some- times we had to discontinue as long as five weeks at a time ; when we met at private houses. But our quarterly meetings were continued ; though I could only attend those that were held in Detroit. At one of these quarterly meetings held this year, at Marshall, at which Rev. H. N. Strong and wife were present, and also Messrs Merriman, Griffin, Wetmore, Hinkle and wife. Freed, Dewey, Galium, King, Murray, Knight, Dobbin, Morton and wife, Titus, Kent, Parkhurst, Silver, H. Weller, wife and son, — T. Weller and wife, Andrews, Harris and wife, Goodrich, Hicks, Fox and wife, Mrs. Rawson, Miss Parker, and others. Mr, Strong preached at the Court House. At this meeting a Resolution was present- ed and adopted for the ordination of Mr. Henry Weller into the Ministry of the New Church, and in the following July, he was so ordained by the Rev. J. R. Hibbard of Chicago. At Flat Rock, I officiated at the funeral of Mrs. R. Children, and preached a funeral sermon there on Sunday, September 24th ; Baptized two adults, and four children ; and administered the Holy Supper to lien persons there. At this time there was a considerable amount of zeal manifested in the cause of the New Church ; and in the minds of many a strong desire to lecture and preach, on the part of those who were recent receivers of the Doctrines; and as yet, but imperfectly acquainted with them; but they were unwilling to be restrained; and although a Resolution on this subject was still pending in the Association, there was no disposition SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING. 191 to await the action of that body upon it ; and this feeling was encouraged by most of the recent re- ceivers of the doctrines, and even apparently sus- tained by the President of the Convention ; wha did not really understand the true state of the case. The consequence was, that many entirely er- roneous ideas were promulgated as the teachings of the New Church ; some of them utterly wild and unfounded, and even dangerous in their tendency. During the year a strong desire was expressed either to purchase a building for the use of the Society in Detroit as a Church : or a lot to erect one on : but although several attempts were made, — none of them were successful. Nothing else seems to have occurred worthy of especial notice during this year, till the assemblmg of the seventh Annual meeting of the Association at Niles, on Friday, February 2nd, 1849. That was not only the larjjest assemblage of the New Church in this region of country ; but also one of the most important; — and perhaps the most unfavorable in its results. It has been said that history repeats itself ; not in j^nrisely the same way ; but in very similar ones. In the first establishment of the Chris- tian Clnurch, there was much zeal and unity, whilst passing through the fiery ordeal of persecution ; but when that subsided, then there began to be in- ternal dissentions, — strivings to take the lead, and to see who should be greatest ; thus party feelings sprung up, divisions and jealousies. And unhap- pily, in our Association, feelings and actions, some- what akin to these, soon began to be developed; VM) ii^ s : I- I , 192 WHO WERE PRESENT. and which the approaching session of the Associa- tion, but too sadly reaUzed. As the proceedinjrs of this meeting were so important it may be proper to give the names of those who were present, as well as a brief statement of the events and circum- stances connected with it. Those in Roman letters were members of the Church ; those in Italics, Readers and Receivers of the Doctrines. From Battle Creek. — Mr. Joseph A. Kent. Mrs. C. L. Rawson, Mr. C. L. Bird, Miss Ann Parker, From Berrien. — Mr. F. B. Murdoch. From Cassapolis. — Mr. Jacob Silver, Mrs. Sher- man, Miss M. Silver, Mrs. Silver, Mr. Sherman, Mrs. Chadfield, Mr. C. Colby. From Cleveland, Indiana. — Mrs. W. Evans, Mrs, Keliog, Mr. L. Kellog. From Detroit. — Rev. George Field, Mrs. Jane E. Field, Mr. L. Lyon, Mr. Ralph Phelps. From Edwardsburg. — Mr. S. W. Jones, Mrs. Jones, Mr. D. B. Sherwood, ^Irs. Sherwood, Mr. Orrin Silver, Mrs. Silver. From Flat Rock. — Mr. Robt. Children, Sen'r. From Goshen (Indiana). — Mr. E. M. Chamber- lain, Mrs. P. A. Chamberlain, Mr. M. H. KoUin, Mrs. A. Rollin,Mr. J. M. Ball, Mr. Peter Kerstetter, Mrs. Mary Kerstetter, Mr. A. B. Clark, Mrs. Clark, Mrs. Martha Cook, Mrs. Cecilia Cook, Mrn. Mary A. Winder, Mr. John Jackson, Mrs. E. Chamber- lain, Mrs. W. Cook, Mrs. Cook, Mrs. Idella Clark, Mr. Aaron Clark, Mr. W. Earl, Mr. J. Mayfield, Mr. S. Chamberlain, Miss Lathrop, Miss Powell. WHO MET AT NILKS. 198 Lmber- liollin, tetter, Iciark, Mary [imber- \ciarh, \vdl. Grand Rapids. — Rev. Henry Waller. Jackson. — Rev. H. N. Strong, Mr. C. L. Merri- man, Mr. D. J. Ilolden, Mrs. Holden, Mr. J. B, Boyle, Miss H. Davis. Little Prairie Ronde. — Mr. G. L. Rogers, Mr. L. B. Lawrence, Miss Eveline E. Copley, Mr. B, Hathaway, Mrs. Hathaway. Marshall. — Mr. Abiel Silver, Mrs. E. PL Silver, Mr. Jacob King, Mr. Jabez Fox, Mr. Hans Thiel- son, Mrs. Mary L. White, Mrs. A. W. Snider, Mr. Robert Andrews, Mr. W. B. Buckingham, Mrs* Buckingham, Mr. A. E. Bliss, Mr. C. R. Robson, Mrs. Thielson, Mrs. E. Wcller. Niles. — Mr. R. H. Murray, Mrs. Mary F. Mur- ray, Mr. H. N. Thielson, Mrs. Lydia E. Hale, Mrs. Mary Rood, Mr. Perlcy Hale, Mr. H. Rood, Mr, H. R()U)ids, Mr. DunJ)ar, Mrs. Dunbar. Pokagon. — 3//'. Charles Evans. Pontiac. — Mr. Jacob. Loop, jr., Mr. Wm. Loop, Mr. Algernon Merriweather, Mr. A. T. Howard. Tecumseh. — Mr. John Allen. These numbers indicated a large increase in the reception of the Heavenly Doctrines from the time I started on my first tour in 1841; although of course they were but representatives of the collec- tive body. In my Ivcport to that meeting, as the Presiding Minister, I state, among other things, that tliere were then three ordained Ministers in the Association, and live societies. Tliat the De- troit Society then contained 28 members, with as many more interested receivers. That during the past year an incipient society luid sprung up in N m 194 THE MEDIUM. the vicinity of Almont, consisting of 12 persons, mostly from Scotland,* and the nucleus of another one at Flat Eock, consisting of 8 persons, mostly from England. That during that year Rev. H. N. Strong had been elected Chaplain of the State Prison, at Jackson ; and had commenced the pub- lication of a New Church semi-monthly paper, called The Medium. \ I also stated that Dr. West- lake, a member of the Methodist Church at Grand Eapids, had been expelled from that Church for receiving the Doctrines of the New Church. Mr. "Weller had also removed to Grand Eapids, and was attracting much attention there by lecturing and preaching on the Doctrines of the New Church. "Witliin the year I had baptized 36 persons ; and * Subsequently, ou the occasion of a Missionary visit to this region, by Rev. Jabez Fox ; they instituted theraselves into a society, (after the English and Scottish manner,) consisting of 17 persons ; and Mr. Fox administered the Holy Supper to them ; but they never united with the Association, This was on Sunday, June 30th, 1850. Mr. J. Marshall was elected Leader. t The first number of this paper was published in Jackson, December 25th, 1848, but a few weeks afterwards, (March Ist, 1849,) it was removed to Marshall, where it was edited and puhliKhcd by Mr. Fox ; and (soon after), at the time Mr. Fox removed to Detroit, he took it with him, and issued it there, jointly with Mr. E. Barber; this was on the 15th of January, 1850. Afterwards it was transferit d to Cincinnati, and edited by Eev. J. P. Stuart; but its name was changed from the Medium to the Mrsseiitjer ; the first number under this name appeared Feb. Ist, 1803. It was still a bi-monthly. But was subsiquentiy made over to the General Convention, and published at New York, under the joint editorship of n v. W. B. Hayden, and Mr. John I-. Jtwett, as a weekly paper, under tin li n.c ofthe AVir Jcrumlem ^Itssenyer. I ,1- MAJORITY AND MINORITY REPORT. 195 ersons, Liiother mostly .H.N. B State he pub- paper, r. West- ii Grand urcb for i\\. Mr. )ids, and lecturing V Cbarcli. ons; and visit to this elves into a lousisting of Supper to TbiH was was elected I in Jacksou, [(March Ist, I edited and [me Mr. Fox lul issued it I the ISth of Cincinnati, Las chantied Iniher under . \)i. monthly. ] Convention, Kliip of »' V. leekly paper, Mr. Strong, five or six. All this presented a very encouraging exhibition. At this meeting a resolu- tion was offered to have Rev. Henry Weller, who had been ordained into the New Church Ministry, about half a year previous ; inaugurated into the functions of an Ordaining Minister ; but as this did not seem to meet with much approbation, the Resolution was withdrawn at his own request. But the subject which seemed to excite the most inter- est at this time, was the Report on the subject of ■"Lectures and Licences;" or more properly, on the preaching and teaching of the Doctrines of the Church. The Committee appointed to report on this, at the last meeting of the Association, had not been able to agree upon it; four, viz., Messrs. R. H. Murray, Abiel Silver, C. L. Merriman, and Hans Thielson, — were agreed, the fifth was myself, and I, unfortunately, as it seemed, could not con- cur in the views they had presented in their Re- port; and so I had drawn up one, presenting, what I considered to be the teaching of the Divine Word, and the Doctrine of the New Church upon the sub- ject, which they were unable to agree to ; so there were two Reports presented to the Association, a Majority Report and a ^linority one. The Majority report was tirst read ; its principal points were in regard to the general principles, functions and organs of man, and of the church ; and that each could best perform his own use ; and in all this there was no difference of opinion : it then also fully admitted tiie lay and clerical func- tions ; but in doinjj; this denied that those who were m ''I 'I r 't J 196 WHO ARE THE CLERGY. I ' i ! [ practically to constitute the Clergy in the Church, need to be inaugurated by any external clerical act of ordination, in order to perform the functions of that office. The language of their Report, on this subject, id, " That internal men are the clergy,and external the laity ; and that, independent of any external ordination." The Report proceeds to say, " Arguments have been adduced to shew that inter- nal men became clergy, only after a formal ordina- tion, or inauguration into the priestly office.'' And then affirms that this is an error. But as Sweden- borg had distinctly stated that, " the clergyman, because he is to teach out of the Word, doctrines concerning the Lord, and concerning Redemption, and Salvation by Him, should be inaugurated by the promise of the Holy Spirit, and by the repre- sentation of its translation ;" (Canons ch. 4 and 7), this was pronounced to be " a mere ritual,'* and not binding upon the Church ; indeed the whole is classed under the term *' Apostolical succession;" and declared to be " an invention from the love of dominion over the holy things of the Church, and over heaven, grounded in self love, which is the devil, as is also the transferring of the Holy Spirit from one man to another." And this extract is taken from A. R. 802, to disprove the position that those who officiate in the Clerical functions should first be inaugurated into that use by ordination ; but it really has nothing to do with it : Sweden- borg's application of it is to " the Pope's viearship ;" and the succession of Peter, and the inherent power of that Chvu'ch ; all of which he says, " is an inven- liurch, cal act ions of an this gy,and of any to say, Lt inter- ordina- ." And aweden- :gyman, octrines jmption, rated by e repre- and7), al,'" and whole is ession ;" lO love of rch, and h is the ly Spirit .tract is ion that .8 should ination ; Sweden- \\i power m inven- AND WHO SHOULD I'HEACH. 197 tion and fiction, whicli ought to l)c rejected," Nor had the question of " Apostolical succession" ever been claimed for the New Church in the sense re- ferred to by Swedenl)org ; or any thing founded upon it, nor any such idea advanced, as "the transferring of the Holy Spirit. /)v>m one nutx. to tuiother ;" or that any one should be ordained " without any agency o^ the general body of the Church;" all of which is assumed in this majority lieport as having been claimed ; when yet nothing of the kind had either been expressed or desired : only that it was dis- orderly, and tended to had results, for every one who felt disposed to assume tlic functions and office of a Clergyman, without being first inaugurated into that use, in an orderly manner, />// the consent and approbation of the Church: but this form and mode of inauguration by ordination, was declared in this lleport to relate " to the order of a corrupt Church ;" and what Swedcnborg says about none others teaching truth in a public, or official capacity, but those who are " teaching Ministers," is explained away ; and the question asked, *' who would presume to say, that a layman really born of water and of the spirit," truly "baptized with the Holy Ghost and with tire" into the "body of Christ;" would still be unable to inseminate truth into another, without giving birth to heresies"? — But does not say who was to be the judge of whether such person was realltf so born, — or so "truly baptized"; or how it should be known whether he had zeal without knowledge; or was carried away by enthusiastic spirits. But to i III ;^ri -;3 4 IJ 198 INCONSISTENT ACTION. Ti m Bustain this view several passages from the Word were quoted, as supposed, by inference, or implica- tion, to involve the idea that as the gospel is free, and salvation is free, so preaching is free, to all "who think, or feel they have an inner call to preach ; and that no other burden should be laid upon them ; yet, the writers of this report do not desire to repudiate an ordained ministry in the Church ; but rather to permit it for all those who choose to avail themselves of it ; but, it continues, " we do, nevertheless believe, that no obstacle, or prohibition, should be laid by the Church upon the free action of its members to teach, severally as they receive the gift, the glorious truths of the New Jerusalem," but rather, that they should be "stimu- lated and encouraged," so to let the light they have thus shine. — Such was the substance of this report; its tendency was to tolerate the existing clerical order ; but to make it cutireli/ optional with tho.^e who believed they had this inward call to preach, whether they complied with the outward order or not. And what seemed to be most remark- able about this, was — that the very persons who wrote this lleport, were those who had taken the lead in inviting me to become the Missionary of the Association ; but had expressly made my ac- ceptance of it conditional upon my being ordained as a Minister in the usual way; and had even pointed out the time and place where I should be 80 inaugurated. And subsequently, three of the four who signed that Report, were among those who passed a Eesolution, asking for the ordination of Mr. H. LATINO ON OF HANDS. 199 Weller, "into the second grade of the New Church Ministry," by an " Ordaining Minister of the New Church," that he might thus be empowered to preach ! And, because he was ordained only into the first grade of the Ministry, at this very meeting of the Association to which the above Report was presented, another resohition was offered, asking that he might again be ordained, with higher powers, as an Ordaining Minister ! And, but for the objections which I made to it, and his own desire to have the Resolution withdrawn, I had every reason to believe it would have been adopted . And yet this majority Report was urged and en- forced by unusual, if not extraordinary efforts ! After it had been read, I asked leave, (which was granted), to read my Minority Report, or Protest ** against that part of the majority Report which acknowledges the right of Lay inauguration into the Priestly office ; and of preaching without Ordina- tion, or License." But as several of the points which were made in the Majority Report, and are here replied to, have already been noticed, I will not again introduce them. The first position in that Report which I dissent from is the declaration therein made, that the laying on of hands in the act of ordination into the ministerial office is not to their knowledge "the exclusive, or even the appro- priate function of the priesthood." To this I reply, that when the Lord ordained His twelve apostles, and sent them forth to preach His gospel, that He ** lifted up His hands, and blessed them "; because by this is denoted influx, or the reception of the 'u I: : i ;■ -srr il 200 ORDER OF INFLUX. I : i::; «! f *i m i I Holy Spirit; and this, says Swedenhorg, **is the reason why inauguration into the Ministry is per- formed hy the imposition of hands," see D. L. & W. 222, and C. L. 390. For, as he says in another place, "to put the hand on the head, \ittifi represented that hlessing was communicated to the intellectual and to the voluntary, thus the man himself, the same ritual remains even at this day, and is in use in inaugurations, and also in l)enedictions," A. C. 6292 — But it was objected, that if tlie laying on of hands, was a part of the service, it does not follow that it needed to l)e the hands of a priest, the hands of a layman being as effective, and as orderly; and that it is questionable w'hether such was a part of the Divine law ; and in evidence, reference is made to Swedenborg's exposition of Nmnbors viii., 9 to 14 ver. ; when yet nothing is there said about ordinations or inaugurations into the priesthood ; but to the an-'mals that were to be sacrificed : and even there, when Jereboam, who was not authorized, put forth his hand u[)on the altar, it " dried up, so that he could not pull it in again to him" ! A. C. 878. And nowhere is it recorded that a priest was ever consecrated by the laying on of tlie hands of a lay- man ; but everywhere that it was the especial func- tion of the ]}riestli/office. And yet a question of doubt was raised as to whether it was so ? My lieport covers this whole subject so fully that it would seem to be impossil)le to question it ; and in conclusion, I adduce the words of Rev. S. Noble in his address to the English Conference ; who says, ** But to suppose that a Society, or Congregation, can itself rUKACHlNCi AND KVANGELIZIXfi 201 'is the is per- inotlier isented [lectual elf, tliG ill use " A. C. g on of t follow jst, the »r Jerly ; cli was ference ii'S viii., l1 about stliood ; (1 : and Jiorizcd, I up, so . C. 878. i-as ever if a lay- al func- of doubt lieport lid seem elusion, address ' But to m itself 1 duly ordain its Minister, is to suppose that influx can fiow from the external which the laity denotes,] into the internal; denoted by the clergy, and in- deed that the external can produce tlie internal, and the expanse the centre." I also shew the in- correctness of the allegation, that " the Holy Spirit id transferred from oiu; man to another ; but that, as Swedenborg says, "the Divine principle, which is Hiiderstood by the Holy Spirit, proceeds fuo.m the Loud, by the clergy to the laity" (Canons, ch. 4), and thiit this is what is meant by what is recorded in the Acts, "that through lay ingon of the Apostles' bands, the Holy Spirit was given.'' (8:18.) I also dwell at considerable length on the differ- ence between preachuui, and erioit/eUziiKj ; and shew that these words have each a distinctive meaning. The Aposth'ti were ordained, and sent out to prmch (prsedico) ; the Disciplns, who were not ordained ; — were sent out to evanfjdizc ; /'. e. to be the bearer of good news ; to go from house to house, proclaiming the joyful tidings ; but never publicly preacliing or performing any of the functions of an ordained apostle. This is shewn to be sustained by the facts in every instance. But no one, under the ap- probation of the Divine law, ever went forth to teach the Doctrines of life and Salvation, as they are re- vealed from heaven, unless in accordance with the same law^ by which that revelation was made : this is shewn from all, and every case recorded, both in the Old and New Testaments. For " no one in the Jewish Church, could preach, or teach truths from heaven to man, without authority, or being f .f Ji ^02 ADDED AUTHORITY. n commissioned, any more than he could officiate at the altar, without incurring the censure of being a false prophet, or priest of Baal, &c." Nor in the Christian Church, unless lirst ordained and commissioned ; for, as the Apostle Paul pertinently asks, " How shall they hear, without a preacher ? And how shall they preach, except they be sent ?" For, as Swedenborg states, it is the province of the Clergyman alone " to teach out of the Word, doctrines concerning the Lord, and con- cerning lledemption, and Salvation, from Him.'' Private and social instruction, in an informal manner could always be given by the laity ; but, "we are taught that the proper function of a Priest is jn-eachinc/, as well as private instruc- tion, (D. C.) And that Priests ** ought to teach men the way to heaven ; and also to lead them." And Priests are also " appointed to administer those things which relate to the Divine Law and wor- ship." (H. D., 351.) But in that Minority Report, I cover the whole ground in extcnso ; and not only so, but I adduce the corroborating testimony of several of our most distinguished and talented ]\[inisters in support of the position I had advanced ; these were the Revs. Thos. Worcester, M. M. Carll, B. F. Barrett, Thos. P. Rodman, Richd. De Charms and Saml. Noble ; besides referring to the able work on this subject by N. F. Cabell, Esq. Yet conscious of the fact, that though I believed I had made my position an unanswerable one ; and •doubting whether it would be tested upon the real \ -i IMPUESSIVE ADDUEH8. 203 merits of the case, knowing as I did, how much feeling, and the prejudice of previously formed opinions might stand in the way, I appeal to them to take time to consider, and weigh the 8u))ject de- liherately and calmly in their minds, before coming to a decision ; — T said " surely we ought not hastily to adopt 80 important a measure as this, without a certain conviction of its truth ; for much of the future weal, or woe of the Church, may depend upon it ; for whatever is not true, or according to order, must be injurious to the welfare and pros- perity of the Lord's New Church." I concluded this Report in the words of the liev. li. DeCharms, thus: "'All then that I have to say to you, who are the guardians of our Church's true Order, and the honored pioneers of her heavenly principles in the great and growing West ; and I do say it from the depth of a most profound love for man's eternal good, in the lasting success of our holy faith ; — be cautious how you, in seemingly plausible accomo- dation to your present wants and exigencies, sow the tares of heresies, which will hereafter spring up and ripen, in the disturbance and rending asunder of our heavenly Church in your borders, by the toleration of lay preaching, instead of the provision of a properly qualilied, well appointed and duly sustained body of regular teaching Minis- ters. It is much easier to begin right, than to correct the late evils of early errors.' " — These two Reports having been read, it was proposed to put them to a vote ; and as there was evidently a strong desire to obtciin as large a number of ••i: II r • « 1 , i ii _,:: »■-■— -'»-3 It. ; 204 PARTY SPIRIT votes as possible for the Majority Report, enquiry was made if all present could not vote ; but the Chair decided that according to the Constitution of the Association, none but members of it could vote. Then it was asked if the Ladies, who were members could vote ; to which the Chair replied that the Constitution said nothing on that subject, consequently there was nothing but the established usages of the Church to go by; and that it had not been the custom for ladies to vote. A llesolution was at once offered that the Ladies should vote on this question, wliicli WaS carried; after which a vote was taken on the adoption of tiie Majority Report ; the vote standing in the allirma- tive 24 ; and in tho negative 5. So that out of fifty-four persons entitled to vote, only twenty-nine votes were cast : twenty-live not voting at all. There was undoubtedly a painful feeling in the minds of many of these, and they did not feel prei)ared to vote either way ; indeed, with the exception of a few, they were so little acquainted with the merits of the case, as to render them really unable to vote understandingly upon it ; and, but for the feeling which had been excited upon the sul)ject, it is doubtful if a dozen would have voted at all. By the afternoon this feeling had somewhat subsided ; amongst others, Mr. Lyon had done what he could to reduce it, and to induce the meeting to act more advisedly ; so, after awhile Mr. Silver made a motion that the vote on this subject, taken in the morning be reconsidered ; and it was so. Mr. Allen then " offered the following Preamble and AND UNFAIR COURSE. 205 Kesolution, which were adopted by a small majority, *' Whereas the Reports from the Committee on Lectures and Licences, relate to a subject of very great importance, on which full reflection and deliberation should be bestowed previous to decisive action, — Resolved, That the whole subject be re- ferred i)ack to the same Committee for further consideration, and to report to the next Annual meeting of the Association." The question after- wards arose as to whether my Minority Report should be published with the Proceedings of the Association, as well as the Majority Report. There was a very decided unwillingness on the part of many to allow it to be so printed ; but finally it was agreed to. And, although not in the order of the proceedings, yet in direct connection with the subject, I may here state, that when the Pro- ceedings were printed, — in a large number of copies, my ^linority Report was left out ; and these were sent to the Editors of the \ew JcrusdloH Mdijazine, and the N. C. Repository ; the latter of which copied nearly the whole of the Mti- jontif Report into its pages, with very laudatory comments ; at that time knowing nothing of the Minority Report, as that was left out in the copies so sent ! And this report as it ap])eared in the Re- pository, w^^ copied into the EngUsh S. (\ Quarterly as soon as it was received by it, witli equal expres- sions of approl)ation. As soon as I discovered this, I sent uninutilated copies of the proceedings, contain- ing both reports, to these periodicals ; and though the English Quarterly did little more than acknow- *ii II P i \i 206 OFFICERS ELECTED. (I I ; ledge its receipt ; Prof. Bush inserted a large por- tion of it, with qualifying praise ; he said, however, " that the two Reports embodied in this pamphlet exhibit a very able discussion of a very important subject, and would make a very useful tract for circulation in the Church, were they published by themselves," which was a very great concession for Prof. Bush to make ; his leanings being so very de- cidedly toward th(i views of the Majority Report : but he always desired to be candid. In the No. for April, 1850, at page 187 ; he published a letter from me in which I explained how this Majority Report was treated in the session of the Association, as well as afterwards. But to return to the doings of the Association, which then proceeded to the elec- tion of officers for the ensuing year ; and Rev. H. N. St'-ong was declared elected as the Presiding Minister, anl R.H. Murray as Recording Secretary, A. Silver as Corresponding Secretary, and Hans Thielson as Treasurer ; the balance of the Acting Committee being, E. M. Charaoerlain, Jabez Fox, and Lucius Lyon. So my name no longer appear- ed among the officers of the Association; and after the reading of my Report the Association appeared to have nothing more for nK; to do. Mr. Allen was a[)pointed to Lecture on Saturday evening ; Mr. Strong to preach on Sunday morning, and admin- ister the Sacraments of Baptism ; and the Holy Supi)er in the al'tenioon ;* and Mr. Weller to lec- •Mr. Strong also nnitetl in marriage Mr. L. B. Lawrence to Miss 11. E. Coplty. MISTAKE CORRECTED. 207 ture in the evening. That this gave great dissap- pointment and dissatisfaction to many I very well knew; and though unwilling, yetto satisfy the urgent request of many of my friends, I consented to make Bome remarks at the close of Mr. Weller's Lecture on Sunday evening. Mr. and Mrs. Hale also wish- ed me to baptize their young child, (Perley,) at their house, which I also did. Let me not however for- get to say, it was subsequently announced that, " by an oversight on the part of the Recording Secretary, who counted the ballots, and announced the result of the election of officers," a slight mistake had been made ; the rectifying of which made me still to be the 'Corresponding Secretary. The Baptists had kindly let us have their Church on the Sabbath for our worship ; and the Odd Fellows the use o^ their Hall for the business and other meetings. This was the largest assemblage of New Church people that had ever been held in this region of country ; and but for that difference of opinion on the subject of the Ministry, would have also been the happiest. Nearly a hundred persons were pre- sent, from sixteen different places. The events of the next year will take less time in recounting. In Jackson, Rev. H. N. Strong, wlio was still Chaplain at the State Prison, com- menced meetings for public worship in a room pre- paivjd for that i)urposo, over IMerriman's storo, on Sunday evening, .January 7th, 1841). The New Church Library was also in operation there. On Sunday, Feb. 2.oth, the Chicago Society was "con- secrated as a religious Society; " having 20 mem- 'lll )i i|; {i •208 ALIENATION OF FEELING. bers, and about 50 persons attending the public worship. Rev. J. R. Hibbard being the Pastor. At this time Mr. Fox, of Marshall, delivered lec- tures on Sunday afternoon, at Mechanic's Hall, Marshall; Mr. John Allen and Mr. A. Silver, also occasionally lectured at various places around. On the 16th of June, at the meeting of the General Convention, Mr. Abiel Silver and Mr. Jabez Fox, were ordained as Ministers of the New Church. Although I continued to officiate gratuitously to the Society in Detroit, I had for some time past felt and seen that my services were no longer as acceptable as they had been ; the positions taken in my Minority Report were regarded as objection- able, and seemed to engender a feeling of dissatis- faction and coldness towards me on the part of a few, who made their influence felt upon others ; and there was no longer the kindness and sympathy manifested towards me that there had been. So, ■after long and earnest reilection on this subject I -came to the conclusion to send in my resignation, as Pastor of the Society ; which I did on the 15th of July, 1849. In doing so I gave a somewhat de- tailed statement of the reasons which had impelled me to take this course; offering, however, to con- tniue to officiate for them as l^efore, until such time as they should be able to obtain the services of another pastor. There were many in the Society who were unwilling to accept my resignation, and a number of meetings were held during several weeks to endeavor to compromise matters; but the strong and persistent opposition of two influential REV. J. FOX ENQAQED. 209 oth de- nied ?on- luch lices liety land 3ral the tial members, at last convinced the others that it would be best to accept it. On the 12th of August, reso- lutions were therefore adopted to that effect by a majority of one; also thanking me for my services in the past, and accepting my offer to continue to officiate for them until such time as they should obtain the services of some other person to be my successor; which was not, however, until tht fol- lowing year. For some time past there had been a good deal of objection made by different partiep to our having the use of the U. S. Court room for meetings, and so the permission to do so was withdrawn ; so, on Sunday, September 16th, we met there for the last time. One week prior to this Eev. J. Fox, of Marshall, had been engaged to succeed me in Detroit, as soon as he could make arrangements to move to the city. In^the mean- time the use of the County Court room had been obtained for our meetings, for worship, and evening lectures, in wliich we met for the tirst time on Sunday morning, Sept. 23rd and on Sunday Oct. 7th, Mr. Fox preached there, and Mr. Si'.ver ad- ministered the Holy Supper, it being the (quarterly meeting of the Society. On the loth of Novembei, I attended the meeting at Urbana, 0., as a delegate from the Detroit Society, to determine upon the establishment of a New Church College. And on Friday evening, November 3()th, I com- menced the delivery of my Course of lectures on the Creation and Flood, for the fourth time in Detroit, they were delivered at the County Couit room, every Friday, Monday and Wednesday evenings. The o .11=1 ; f 'I d m ?! ■fiJM 11 il III 210 EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING. room was usually crowded, and many additional seats brought in. This time there was not a word of unfavorable notice from any of the papers ; but some that were highly eulogistic. On the 22nd of December, I went to Jackson and delivered four lectures on the Doctrines of the Church, and preached on Sunday morning. The audiences were very good and attentive. On Friday, Feb. 1st, 1850, the Eighth Annual meeting of the Mich. & N. Ind. Association was held in Detroit — in Mechanic's Hall. But there was already a great falling off from the attendance of the previous year ; and as no other record was made of the proceedings than a letter from the Cor. Secretary, (J. Fox), to the N. J. Mag. — in which it is stated that there were six societies, as before, and that lectures had been delivered at various places by Mr. Siiver, Mr. Weller, Mr. Fox and myself ; and that Prof. Bush's ** Statement of Reasons" had been pretty widely distributed, also that a Eesolution had been adopted strongly urging that the name of the Genl. Con- vention be changed to that of General Conference ; and that it only meet triennially, and be merely advisory in its character. It also stated that the meeting " was a very pleasant one. The snl ject of Lay Lectures and License, was harmoniously, and finally settled by adopting the recommendations of the Majority report! " Saying however that they were " a compromise between views, which, in the abstract conflict," but expressing the conviction that "in their practical operation" they would be " a satisfactory settle- il LEFT FOR ST. LOUIS. 211 jons Imise but Itical Ittle- ment of the whole matter " (?) I took no part in the proceedings of this meeting, as the time had now arrived when I was to dissolve my relations with the Detroit Society, and the Michigan Association. But on Sunday morn- ing (Feb. 3rd,) I preached for the last time, and, by their own particular request, baptized Judge Bell, and Sally, lioseby, Vincent, John, and George Bell, Mr. F. Finster, Mr. C. Risdon, Mrs. Paull, Mrs. Allen, Miss E. Storry, and Miss C. Merriweather. In the afternoon Mr. Silver administered the Holy Supper to about 40 communicants, — assisted by Messrs. Fox and Strong. After which Mr. Fox preached a Sermon ; and Mr. Weller officiated in the Evening. Some time previous to this, the St. Louis N. C. Society having learned in some way, that I was about to dissolve mv connection with the Detroit Society, had opened a correspondence with me, and invited me very urgently to accept the Pastorship of their Society — this however I did not do ; but I agreed to make them a visit and Lecture and preach to thum for two mouths : so on the day the Association adjourned i.e., Monday Feb. 4th, I left Detroit, intending to make several Missionary visits on my way to St. Louis. My first stopping place was Ypsilanti, where I delivered three Lectures to good audiences ; on February 4th 5tli and 0th; thence I went to Chicago and preached there on Sunday morning, Feb. lOfcli. Next day I left for Peoria, and commenced the delivery of my Course of nine Lectures there on the Creation, &c. the second time, to audiences of nearly 300 persons. S 212 ON MY WAY. Preaching also on two Sabbath days. On the 26th I deUvered a Discourse to the passengers on the Steam Boat Prairie Bird on my way to St. Louis, where I arrived the next day : and on the 28th commenced the same Course of Lectures for the second time at Wyman's Hall, to audiences varying from 100 to 500 persons. Before leaving St. Louis I again received a very unanimous and cordial invitation to become their Pastor : ])ut as we were not entirely agreed in regard to the distinctive difference between the Sacrament as administered in the Old Church and the New, I did not feel at liberty to accept, — but stated to them the ground of my objection. After some discusion on the sub- ject my views were acceded to, and I accepted their call ; but was not to enter upon my duties till the ensuing autumn, April 25th, 1850. 1 lelt St. Louis on my way back to Detroit, delivering another Lecture on the Boat. On my arrival in Chicago, by previous arrangement I also commenced on the delivery of the same Course of Lectures there, the second time, on Wednesday evening May Ist, at the Saloon building. They were well attended. On the I3th, I left Chicago, and next day was again in Detroit. In June, I attended the Convention in New York, and on my return delivered two Dis- courses on tlio Doctrines of the New Church in the Rev. S. May's Church, at Syracuse. On the 6th of September, 1850, I left Detroit, with my family and household goods for St. Louis, stayed over the sabbath at Chicago, and preached there ; and also at Peoria ; from thence I went to SAFE ARUrVAL. 213 Canton, 111., where I delivered a Course of Six Lectures to the Society and others; and adminis- tered the Holy Supi)er to 15 Communicants ; arriving at St. Louis on the 25tli, and comuKuiced our regular Sahbath worship on Sunday morning, Oct. 0th (1850.) at the Church on the corner of St. Charles and Sixth streets , and on the 27th was received as Pastor of the Society. The events of the past year were among the most trying and pain- ful I had ever experienced. For the previous ten years my life had been devoted to the promulgation of the Heavenly J)octrines of the New .Ferusalem mainly in ■Michigan and Northern Indijiiia ; and in this ettbrt I had labored with what ability I possess- ed, through much opposition and many trials, and no small share of ol)lo(piy. Part of tlie time left alone with three little children, and not knowing how to provide for them, or vwn to su[)ply their daily wants. I yet pressed onward, trusting in the jirovidence of the Lord to sustain me ; and He did sustain me, and uphold me ; though often sorely tried by those to whom I looked for encouragement and support ; still I experienced that the mercy of the Lord is from everlasting to everlasting ; and that lie never forsakes. And not only so, but that He provided for all my needful wants. I was also ha])py in knowing that I had many true friends whose kindness will ever be remembered. Among these, none were more so than Mr. and Mrs. Dorr; and Mr. Lucius Lyon. But being satisfied that my services were no long- er appreciated as they had been, at least by an active ■ i) S n II i'll: 214 TO MEET NEW TRIALS. few, who had produced discord and division ; I re- olved to depart in peace as soon as my place could be filled, which, as I have already stated, was in due time accomplished. I also gave notice that as soon as my successor should come, I should resign ray position in the Surveyor General's office, which I accordingly did, without, at that time, the most distant idea of where I should go, or what I should do. And it was a great surprise to me, that so soon afterwards I should have received a letter in- viting me to become the Pastor of the St. Louis Society ! For though the pecuniary compensation would not be two-third ) of what I received for my secular employment in Detroit, it would yet enable me to devote all my time and energies to the cause of the Church. Still it was with a feeling of much sadness and regret that I left Michigan lor a dis- tant and almost unknown state, to begin again in a new field of labor ; ar.d again to experience new trials, and now difficulties. It was expected that a new building, the upper part of which was to be used as a House of Wor- ship for the New Church Society, would be com- pleted by the time 1 returned to St. Louis; but this was found to be impracticable. I arrived at St. Louis on the 25th of September, staying on the way from ])etroit, at Chicago, and preaching there on the Sabbatfi ; then attended the annual meet- ing of the Ilhnois Association at Peoria, and preaching there on the following Sabbath; then delivered five lectures at Canton, and commenced my pastoral duties by preaching at the Church on VISIT TO QUINCY. 215 the corner of St. Charles and 0th streets, on Sun- day, October 6th, 1850. During my stay at St. Louis, I went to Quincy, lUinois, with the inten- tion of deHvering a course of lectures there, on the Creation and Deluge ; but, owing to its being too early in the season, (September /ith,) the atten- dance did not seem to warrant ray doing so. I therefore delivered but ono lecture, and then in- serted a valedictory Card in the Daily Journal, with a few gentle hints expressive of my regrets &c., which the Editor pleasantly alluded to, as shaking off the dust of my feet, as a testimony against th • mdifference of the people; adding, how- ever, that my remarks were " well delivered;" and making additional strictures in support of them; and summing them up with the compliment, "Mr. Field is eminent as a Lecturer; we regret that his success was no better." Soon after my return to St. Louis, I went to Peterborough, near Springfield, Illinois, where I delivered twelve lec- tures at the Court House, which were very fairly attended, although it was raining almost all the time I was there. On my way back I stayed at Springfield long enough to deliver two lectures on the Itesur- rection, and the Spiritual world, which also were well attended. About the middle of October (1851), I went to Alton, and delivered ten lectures there, and one sermon; these were on the first chapters of Genesis, the Life after Death, and the unchaugeableness of God ; they were well attend- ed. These lectures were delivered at Concert Hall. >m. ■ I I 216 MR. WELLEU H CLAIM, About thin time, or soon after, un unexpected and somewhat remarkable event occurred in the Michi- gan Association, evidently produced by certain dis- turbing elements in the World of Spirits, which, in connection with other, and kindred influences, were seeking to paralyze and destroy the man-child of the New Church as soon as it was born. In the beginning of the year 1852, several of the Ministers of the New Church and leading and inHuential lay- men received each a comnuuiication from i{ov. Henry "Weller, then of (irand Papids, Michigan, notifying them that they were to attend a meeting he had appointed, to be held in that city about the middl(! of i'ebruary, that same year, to commence, and lay the foundations of the New Church, under his directions and supervision. That he received authority lor doing this from iSwedenborg ; and that he was chosen as the Lord's High Priest on earth, with authority to appoint all those who were to officiate in the Ministerial office. This meeting was appointed to be held in Grand Uapids on the same days that the Tenth Annual meeting of the Michi- gan and N. 1. Association was to be held in Detroit. The letter which I received at St. Louis, requir- ing me to attend, Mr. Weller informed me, ' was ■written by direction of Lucius Lyon, your fmy] old friend in Detroit ; but now as you will know, the Lord's instrument for establishing true order in the Church." Mr. Lyon was then living in the Spirit- ual world. The letter was as follows : — *' To George Field. — You are hereby informed that a meeting of the brethren called to lay the foundation of the AND HIS I,KTTER TO MK. 217 it- ge of the Lord's Church on earth, will be hold at Grand Rapids on the 13th, 14th, and 15th of next month; at which meeting you are rerj nested to attend. Moreover it \h the Lord's willtluit yon he then, and there present, if it be possible, to receive sueli in- structions as may b(> given you by me, througli the Lord's High Priest, who is already known to thee; and within whose jurisdiction thou hast been placed in vision, l)y the Lord's servant, Knianuel Sweden- borg, who hast given thee a testimony in the jjatiu language, a language thou canst not write ; and which few can writi' at the present day. Wiierefore it is the Lord's will that you bring tluifc testimonial with you, to be ])r()duced, how, and wh(!n, and where, the Lord pl(;aseth : Lirnrs Lyon, through the hand of the Lord's High Priest Hknry " This was dated January '22nd, lHr)2. I was as much bewildered as 1 was surprized, to receive such a communication. It was inexplicable, and yet it was absurd and pnjsumptuous. I had received no such document, either in Latin, or any other language, as he said I had ; and so of course I could not bring it ; and if 1 had, I sliould not. Of course I did not attend the meeting ; nor did I answer, or pay any attention to the summons. A few, (a very small few), did attend, and inaugu- rated a sort of spiritualistic fraternity, seeking open intercourse with the spiritual world ; and a kind of spiritual wife system, together with other peculiari- ties and assumptions, and follies, which led to much discord and unhappiness. * ^^ m 218 RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED. All this was distinctly and emphatically repudiat- ed at the regular meeting of the Michigan and N. I. Association ; at which meeting Mr. R. H. Mur- ray offered the following Resolutions, which were unanimously adopted : viz : — ** Whereas, — A communication received by this Association from Henry Weller, of Grand Rapids, together with various other letters received by members thereof, and others, from the same source, do most conclusively demonstrate in him, a state of mind eminently unfitting him for the useful dis- charge of a pastor, or minister : therefore. Resolved imanimously, — That this Association no longer recognize the said Henry Weller as a Minister of the New Church. Resolved, — That A. Silver, E. M. Chamberlain, and John B. Niles, be appointed a Committee to correspond or confer with said Henry Weller and endeavour to draw him, as a misguided brother, from the lamentable delusion into which he has fallen. Resolved, — That recent occurences afford new testimony in support of Swedenborg's oft repeated cautions of the dangers of open intercourse with spirits ; and should be received as a special warnir^g to New Churchmen." The following year, (1853), the Association met at La Porte ; it was a stormy and unhappy meet- ing. Mr. Weller it seems had the control of the pulpit in the Society's House of Worship ; and in- sisted upon preaching there on the Sunday morn- ing ; this was held by Mr. Fox to be a claim for VISIT TO 8T. CHARLES. 219 -g n- 'or him to be recognized as a New Church Minister, although repudiated as such at the last meeting of the Association ; he therefore decidedly objected to his doing so. Mr. Fox was sustained by Mr. Hib- bard, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Niles, Mr. Andrews, and others ; Mr. Weller refused to recede. At last he could bear the pressure no long«ir, and very unwil- lingly and ungraciously gave up the pulpit. The Convention also removed Mr. Weller's name from the list of Ministers. In March, 1852, by invitation of Mr. Judge, I went to St. Charles, Missouri, and delivered three Lectures on the Doctrines of the New Church, to very respectable audiences. In May, I again at- tended the annual meeting of the Illinois Associa- tion, held at Peoria, where I preached once, and delivered two Lectures: one on being graven on the hands of the Lord, and the other on the origin of the human race. I continued my pastoral re- lations with the St. Louis Society till the autumn of 1852; and then as suddenly as unexpectedly, they were dissolved. There had been a disturbing element in the Society from the beginning which had divided and weakened its power for use, and finally separated it into two nearly equal parts; but the majority still continued to maintain public worship; and were just about to lay the founda- tions for their long contemplated Church edifice, when another apparently slight and unimportant event occurred which resulted in the non-renewal of my engagement with the Society as its pastor ; and I preached my farewell sermon there on Sun- i'l' V : 1^ 220 LECTURES IN CARROLTON. day, September 26th, 1852. Notwithstanding the difficulties which had unhappily occurred to divide the Society, my own personal and social relations to the members had always been kind aud pleasant^ and have continued so to the present day. Eight years afterwards, by invitation, I made them a long missionary visit when I received a very cordial and unanimous call to again become Pastor of the Society ; but the portentous sounds of the approaching civil *\ar were so threatening^ and the generally disturbed state of the country, were of themselves sufficient reasons to deter me from its acceptance: still 1 shall ever cherish in my remembrance the many pleasant hcurs I have passed in St. Louis, as also the many land friends I have found there. On the 2nd of October, 1852, I left my family in St. Louis, and went in search of a new home, going first to Carrolton, Illinois, where by previous arrangement, I was to lecture. j\[r. Curtius, with whom I stayed, had engaged for me the use of the ^lethodist Church for a course of lectures ; the lirst of which I delivered on the evening of my arrival there ; it was introductory to the Course on the Creation of the Universe, &c» The roads were very muddy, and the audience was not large. The next evening on going to the church with Mr. Curtius, we found the door locked, and tlie inside dark and cold ! Neither key nor sexton could be found; and this was the way we were refused its further use: so no lecture was de- livered that evening. The next day Mr. C. ob- tained for me the use of the Presbyterian Church EN3AGED AS MISSIONARY 221 in which I concluded the course ; nine lectures in all. For various reasons, as may easily be under- stood, they were not numerously attended ; one was, it was on the eve of a presidential election, and perhaps the subjects ranged somewhat higher than the ordinary grade of thought in that locality ; and they had to meet the usual amount of pre- judice against anything that was out of the or- dinary current of established prejudices. Whilst at Carrolton I met, by previous arrangement, the Kev. J. R. Hibbard, President of the Illinois As- sociation, and accepted an engagement to act as a missionary for the Illinois Association till it should meet at Peoria on the 27th day of May following ; with the exception of three weeks, which I reserved to attend to my family whilst removing from St. Louis to our new home in Jacksonville, Illinois : making six months for missionary labor, for which I was to receive $300.00 and pay my own expenses, in addition to the supporting of my family in St. Louis, (aided by such incidental help as 1 might meet with on the way). To do this as economically as I could, I ])ought me a horse and Imggy, for which I paid $1(10. 00; this also saved me the ex- pense of freight for books I carried with me for sale. After leaving Carrolton, I revisited Jackson- ville, where, some ten or eleven years before I had lectured, and encountered the renowned Prof.Turner. This is a very pleasant town ; and finding a loca- tion that I tliought would be desirable, I made ar- rangements to remove there with my family as soon as mv encagement with the Illinois Association should 3' S I "IPn 222 TREMONT AND PARMINOTON. be terminated. I repeated my Course of Lectures on the Creation and Deluge at the Universalist Church; and, this time, without opposition; at least not of a direct, or opon character ; but many vrere very favorably impressed. I went from Jacksonville to Pekin intending to lecture there ; but owing to the incessant rain and deep mud did not attempt it ; but proceeded to Tremont, where I found hospitable entertainment with our esteemed friends Mr. and Mrs. Emerson. I delivered seven lectures here on the leading Doctrines of the New Church ; — being permitted by the courtesy of the Kev. A. Andrews, to use the Presbyterian Church for that purpose ; my lectures also were well at- tended. Hence I went to Peoria, the scene of my earlier labors (in the winter of 1842-3), and lectured on three successive evenings. I next visited Farmington, (by previous arrange- ment), and delivered six lectures in the Universalist Church, on the Resurrection and the Spiritualworld. This place was a sort of head quarters for Spiritua- lism ; although it seemed to me to he more allied to Naturalism ; judging from the rude and uncultured aspect of the surroundings ; it w:is the least attrac- tive of any place I visited, and, I should think, least receptive of the New Church Doctrines. My next stopping place was Galesburg, at wliich place I gave eleven lectures, touching upon all the fundamental Doctrines of the New Church, com- mencing Decemher 2nd, 18r)2. By the intluonce of our N. C. brother Judge Lan',)here, I was permitted the use of the Baptist Church for nine of them ; OALESBUKO AND PRINCETON. 228 although it was reluctantly granted ; and Mr.. Newton, the Baptist Elder was evidently a good deal disturbed at the views I presented ; and gave two or three lectures which were intended to refute them. The use of the Universalist Church, or "Liberal Institute" was freely granted, and my lecture there on the Divine attributes was listened to by a very large audience. One lecture I gave at a private house. There was of- course, a considerable diversity of sentiment in regard to these Lectures ; as also a good deal of prejudice on the one hand, and indifference on the other; but the lectures awakened new trains of thought, which it is hoped might be useful. From Galesburg, I went to Princeton. This was a tedious and perilous journey, it was the depth of winter, and bitterly cold ; in crossing the open prairie I got out of the way, the track being partly covered by thii. ice and snow and the wind blowing a hurricane ; and I was yet three miles from Providence when it grew dark, so that it needed the utmost watchfulness to keep the track ; at last the glimmer of a distant light was my only guide ; and it was with great thankfulness that at last, stiff and well-nigh frozen, I found poor shelter, and a comfortless night's lodging at Providence. Next day, (Friday, Dec. 17th), I arrived at Prince- ton where 1 found a pleasant resting place in the house of ]\Ir. A. 13. Thayer and wife. Here I deli- vered a Course of Ten Lectures at the Court House cliietlv on the Creation and Flood. Here, of course I encountered the usual opposition ; and here 1 met w i II l<l 1 ' 1 M-, M m b 1 ■ill I i- I FSF 224 DR. SAMUEL MARSHALL. with a very marked character, a member of the Presbyterian Church ; a man who by unconquerable perseverance, and very Hmited education, had, from being a journeyman mechanic, obtained a diploma as an eclectic physician, and was then practicing medicine in Princeton ; he attended all my Lec- tures; became deeply, and enthusiastically interested in them ; obtained N. C. Books, and soon proclaim- ed himself as an earnest receiver of the Doctrines: this of course brought him into trouble with the Presbyterian Church, and caused his dismissal: but nothing discouraged, he was instant in season, and out of season, advocating and proclaiming them. He has since become a Homceopathic physican, but is now living in Southern California, and plodding over the old and new Testaments in their original tongues ; and as zealous as ever in the cause of the New Church ; and only grieving that no N. C. Minister has as yet como that way ; if any should do so, let them enquire for Dr. 8. Marshall. I left Princeton on the 80th of December ; and the next day commenced a Course of Lectures on the Doctrines of the New Church at Dixon ; making my home, whilst there, with ]\[r. Wm. Patrick, and Mr. Heaton. There was a Ba[)tist and a Methodist Church in this village, and I was freely tendered the use of each for my Lectures. Seven I deliver- ed in the former ; and one in the latter. There appeared to be a struggle between these two Churches to see whicli should be the greatest ; nor were they very particular as to what their members believed, especially if they had means and influence. I UOCKFORD AND BRLOI!'. 225 id it Id re 10 r Is Quite a imniber became very iniieh interesteil in my Lectures, which woro on tlio Doctrine of the Lord — Tlio Atononiont — -The Sacred Scriptures — Heaven and Hell, iVc. I dehvered niy last discourse in Dixon, January (Uh, 185:5, and coninienced a Course of Eight Lectures on the leading Doctrines of the New Church, in the Unitarian church at •liockford, on the 8th. Mr. Windsor, the Unitarian Minister attending most of them ; and was very courteous and attentive^ during their delivery. I stayed whilst at liockford, with my old friends, Mr. andlSlrs Wheaton, (formerly of Jiattle Creek ; ) ana an earnest desire was expressed that I might stay longer, and extend the Course ; ])ut my arrange- ments would not [x-rmit me. ^Fr. Henry Weller, hap[)i'ning to pass through Piockford at the time, preached then; on the first Sunday afternoon, after my arrival. 1 left liock- ford on the! morning of Jan. 17th, and the same evening comuienci'd a Cours<i of I'jleven liectures on the Creation of the Universe, t?(e Flood ; and the Divine Attributes, at Deloit, Wiscon. These Lectures had to be given in iliree diiVerent places ; the first (me in tlu; basement of the Congregational Church; and tlie others in School rooms a mile apart from* eacli other : i)ut the rooms were filled every evening; somethnes as many as 100 persons being present. They produced quite a sensation, and were generally well received. J^'rom lieloit I went to Milwaukee, where 1 arrived January •28th, and stayed there between two and three weeks, de- livering in all liftcen Lectures in Young's Hall, to i II ! ! fi 5 li| 226 MILWAUKEE, ETC. congregations of from 300 to 400 persons ; abstracts of which were pubHshed in the Daily papers. My subjects were the Creation ; the Divine Attributes ; Heaven and Hell ; &c., &c. There were then quite a number of professed receivers of the Heavenly Doctrines living in Milwaukee, among them were my Host and Hostess, Mr. and Mrs. William l^ell, Hr. PersonSjMr. Ladd,Mr. Stringfellow,and others. From Milwaukee I went to Waukegan where I delivered four Lectures, on the Language of Scrip- ture, the Spiritual World, &c., to very full and at- tentive audiences. This place is another centre of Spiritualism, against Vv'liieh,iay Lectures, although of course aggressive, were very favorably received. I arrived at Chicago on the 19th day of February (1853); made a flying visit to Detroit, and returned to Chicago, where I preached twice. During my stay here, I was kindly and hospitably entertained by my friends of the olden time, liev. Mr. (and Mrs.) Barrett. On the 3rd day of March, after a wearisome and tedious journey, over roads al- most impassible for mud, I found myself again at Ottawa, where, about ten years before my Lectures had awakened so much interest. Here I was the guest of Mr. and Mrs. Jacob Stone, who had now become full receivers of the N. C. Doctrines ; as also had many others ; and there was a very kindly recollection of my former visit. I delivered this time ten Lectures on the Doctrines of the New Church, at the Court House, wiiich were well at- tended. I also renewed my acquaintance with Mr. Hise, of the Free-trader, whose columns had .1 HENRY, PEIEUSBURO, ETC. 227 as Ibis few at- rith tiad contained so kindly a notice of my Lectures. After leaving Ottawa, I delivered one Lecture in the School House at ^Faj^nolia ; and tiien set my face for Henry, where I found myself on the l/)th day of March, safely sheltered in the friendly home of Dr. C. l>avis. Here I gave seven Lectures ; six of them in the " Christian Church," and one in the Protestant ^Methodist Church. j- These Lectures were on the Sacred Scri{)ture8, the Atonement, Pleaven and Hell, d-c, and were very well attended. On the 2ard of IMarch (1853), I left Henry, and the next day delivered a Dis- course in Peoria on the correspondence of the Serpent, and its tem[)tations. On the '25th, I sttirted for Jacksonville, which was to be my future home, passing through Tremont and Springfield ; and after a tedious and wearisome journey I arrived safely at my destined haven on the 30th ; and next day went to Naples to meet my two youngest children, on their way from St. Louis whom I had not seen for the past six months. My wife did not arrive till the 27th of April. I ex- pected now to have a rest ; but the expectation was an illusive one, for within a few hours of her arrival, I w;is on my way to fulfil an engagement to Lecture at Petersburgh, where I was absent nine days ; being detained by incessant rains which had caused the rivers to overflow their banks, and drown the bridges, where there were any. I re- turned to Jacksonville on Saturday, the 7th day of May, at 8 o'clock in the evening, alter a very toil- some and dangerous journey. ill 'nu ^■M fll f i --r * I ll'l I IHI : 228 REPORT TO ASSOCIATION. I I In my lU;port to tlio Jllinois Association, I say, " \vitliin the past ciglit months I have visited, and lecture d at seventeen difTerent i)hices, giving in all, 124 disconrses. In most of the places 1 visited the Doctrine had never hefore hecn piil»licly pro- clnimed. In many of the i)laces the resident Clergy- men attended the Lectures ; sometimes once, at other times frecpiently ; hut only in one place, (Gale^hurj;), did anyone attem[)t to controvert my arguments. Although ]\Ir. llihbnid had jtrcccded me in most, or all the pla-cs 1 visited, l)ut a few weeks hefore, nnd had nlready sold a large stock of N. C. Books, 1 nevertheless disposed of hetween eighty 'and ninety dollars worth; Jind it may reason- ahly he expected that the seed thus sown will not all perish ; hut will much of it, if not all, yield fruit for future harvest." I conclude my report thus : ** I have said nothing in the ahovc narrative of how I got from one place to another, hecause this was of little importance to the Association to know : yet it nuiv ho allowable for me to say, that for full three fourths of the altove time, travelling was toilsome, dil'licult, and ])erilous. The roads were like a plowed lield, soaked with water, — only full of holes and ridges ; or, as on the prairie sod, sometimes llooded and saturated, or like a shallow lake. Twice 1 had to get other horses to haul my buggy from bottomless nuul holes ; once nearly drowned in fording the deep and rapid Vermillion, swollen by heavy rains; once to pass through a wide lagoon of water four feet deep, and cross a bridge underneath it, sometimes drenched through INADEQUATE MEANS. 229 with rain, and no holp for it; at other times ahnost frozen with a hitter north-west wind, l)lowing like a hurricane over a [)rairie where, for miles, neither house, fence, or tree, could he seen; crossing 4'i vers when only half frozen, hetween great holes in the ice ; and riding after dark on the open prairie, and guessing at the road in the dei)th of winter; some- times losing my way on these waste wildernesses, or passing the night in rude houses, only next to being in the open air. Yet this hy no means coji- "veys an idea of the travelling in this new country for eight months, — from October to June ; neither can I tell the dread I felt in commencing a fresh journey. ]^ut I have experieuct.'d the mercy and protection of the Lord in all my sojourning; and, with hut sliglit exception have had good health, and good courage to [)ursue my way. I have, to the hest of my ahility, accom[>lished my engage- ment witli the Association, and shall now hj glad to take a little rest." In presenting this ile{)ort, I added verbally, that although I had used the utmost economy in the support of my family, and in my travelling expen- ses, I had found it impossible to meet them for the amount the Superintendent of the Association had agreed to pay me ; and that I had been obliged to expend an additional hundred ilo'iars from my own pocket to enablo me to pay my way. After the reading of my Report, and mv making the above statement, it was moved by i)r. Melrose, and seconded by liev. T. Storry, " That this Associa- tion pay the Kev. G. Field the sum of one hundred n ■ I 'A: i i- - 1 i; l! l» 230 AT JACKSONVILLE. dollars extra for his services as Missioiuiry during the past winter." This, ai't'jr some discuHsion, was "referred to tiie lOxecutive Coiiiiuittee, with power, to act at discretion." Thev did do so, and declined payinj^ me jin additional cer ' ^'ut sent a hundred dollars to (iermany and Frr> to aid in disseminating the Doctrines there; and then re- ported thsit they " have a sum still in the Treasury, and continually accumulating, as a means of fur- ther effort." This ended my engagement with the Illinois Association. Having met with so little to encourage and sustain me in mv labors in this cause, I now felt disposed to rest, and retire within myself, and minister to the recuperation of my natural wants, and the requirements of my family; trusting that it might still he true that " Th«'y al nrve, who and stand wait." I therefore settled down on mv little homestead at Jacksonville, with a view to making it a perma- nent home. And for awhile this occupied all my energies ; still I felt the need of spiritual sustenance and intercourse with those of a kindred faith. There were Mr. and Mrs. llamsey. Dr. .Jones, and a few others living there who were either full, or partial receivers of the Doctrines ; and so, after awhile we concluded that we wouhl hold public meetings on the Sabhath for religious worshi[) and instruction. Accordingly on Sunday, Jan. 28th, 1855, we com- menced meetings for this purpose in ^[assey's school-house ; about a mile from my house, and two miles from town. They were very fairly at- LKTTKR FROM DETROIT. 231 tendod, not only by tlio residents round about, but also l)v nmnv who drove over IVoin the villa''e in tlie al'tcnK^oii to attend. I'Ik^si' were continued re<i;ularly, with but one exception, on aceou!it of rain, to tlu; ond of Ma}'; when it beinj; so close and warm in the sehool-rootn, it was proposed, and agreed to, that we meet in JJceroft's drove, a plea- sant and suitable place close by. We met there regularly with but three exceptions, (on account of rain), till the close of August; — [ having delivered in all 28 discourses on the Doctrines of the Church, in addition to stated worship). Then, for various reasons, thev were discontinued. On the 12th of January, 185l>, 1 r(;c,eived an in- formal letter from the Detroit Society, (dated the 6th), desiring to know if I would be willing to return to ^fichigau and fjecture in the State, at various places, for about three months, or longer ; or act conjointly 'th Mr. Fox, in pastoral and missionary work in the > >y and State. In reply, I referred to some of the causes which had induced me to send in my resignation, and the unworthy reasons which had been asigned for its acceptance ; adding if they were withdrawn and a Resolution expressive of re" gret for receiving them, unanimously adopted by the Society, I should feel myself at liberty to make arrangements with thom in regard to missionary work in Michigan. And in due time this was done not only by the Detroit Society ; but also by the Executive Committee of the Michigan Association in regard to their own conduct towards me. I therefore willingly accepted their offer to return to V l L !! n 232 llETUKN TO MICHIGAN. Michigan for the winter, and Lecture at such places as should he agreed upon, and these places were, first Detroit, where I arrived on Saturday, ¥eh. {)tli and the following evening delivered a Discourse at the Church on Jefferson Avenue, (formerly the Congregational Church), on lietril>-iion ; and on the following Tuesday commenced a course of Lectures on the Spiritual world ; the language of Scripture, the Trinity &c., and on Saturday, March 1st, (185G,) I went to Jackson, where I gave 12 Lectures on the general Doctrines of the Church ; one of which was to the captives in the State Prison, — on the ]jook of Life. The following Sunday (March IG) I delivered the first of four Lectures on th^ Spiritual world, Modern Spiritualism, Sec, at Battle Creek. Thence I went to Charlotte, and delivered eight Lectures in the Court House on some of the fundamental Doc- trines of the Church. From Charlotte I went to Lansing, jind delivered 13 Lectures in the Senate Chamber, commencing with one on Swedenhorg as a philosopher : — then on the necessity of a New Dispensation of Divine Truth : these were followed by the Course on the Creation of the Universe ; — the Laws and vunhis operandi of its production — the symbolic history of the Creation as given in Genesis, *.Vc. From Lansing I went to Grand Ra- pid s, where I delivered a similar Course, making in all twelve Lectures and Sermons : these were given in the Society's House of worship in that City : the attendance was somewhat varied on ac- count of the rain ; but was upon the whole very ' CALLHD TO DETROIT AGAIN. 233 good. I stayed in Gr.and Ilapids between two and three weeks ; 'Mr. llihhnrd passed throuf,di wliilst I was there, and preaclied on Sunday mornin<j;, April 13th (1850). [ next visited Porthmd, where 1 de- Uvered four Lectures in the Universahst Church, on the Doctrine of the Lord, and Human redemp- tion, the Resurrection, and Heaven and Hell. Thence I returned to Grand Rapids, and preached there twice on Sunday, the 4th day of May ; this ended my engagement with the Michigan Associa- tion ; and on the next day I left for homo, (via Chicago), where I arrived on the 7th. I had Lec- tm'ed in eiglit different places, and delivered in all seventy one Discourses ; besides calling at several other places, and making visits where was no con- venience for holding public meetings. I found a ready and kindly welcome in every place I visited, and a readiness to do all that was required in pecu- niary aid. Wliilst in Detroit, and subsccpiently, I was ^3l\y earnestly requested by the leading and influential members of that Society to rtturn to Detroit, and again resume my pastoral relation to the Society there; Mr. Fox, (their then pastor), also uniting in this desire ; as for various reasons, he did not expect to remain there ; and whilst at Lansing I received a formal overture from the So- ciety, again to become its pastor ; asking me, at the same time, on what conditions I would accept it. So strong was the desire for my return that one individual otfered to give $300 a year towards defraying ex- penses; another olYered to give !?200; another $100; several $50 each ; and there seemed to be no dilti- In. I I i:: M 234 CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE. culty in raising sufficient to meet all incidental ex- expenses, in addition to $700.00 a year assured me fcr my services. In my reply in regard to the required conditions, I said, among other things, that it would be a " most deceptive fallacy to think that WB can live as a Church, any more than as a nation, without Laws for guidance and control ; — nor can it he optional with man whether he will observe them or not : and the very fact of any one's being received as a member of the Church whilst he yet declines to submit to the Laws the Lord has given to his Church, which are but truths in form, is an indication that there is a disturbing and way- ward element within, which must sooner or later manifest itself in dividing and rending the Church asunder." "And, as far as possible, to prevent any misunderstanding, I will at once state to you some of the settled convictioiis of my own mind of what is the true and orderly course by which a person should l)e received as a member of the New Church; or any of its Societies, viz: ''That he make an open and i)ublic avowal of his belief in the sole and supreme Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ, as the only object of worship in the New Jerusalem ; and that in order to be saved he must shun all evils as sins against God ; and live a life according to His Commandments; and that he be baptized into that faith and life by a Muiister of the New Chuich;" — and, " that I should not be expected to administer the Sacrauu'ut of the Holy Supper to any one who had not been so l)aptized." I also added th< hope " that this should become the KEGARDING THE SACRAMENTS. 235 deep and earnest conviction cf every meniLer of the Society ; for it is the strongest conservative element winch can liind a society together; and because they would feel it us a Divine Law wliich they woukl love to obey." But clear and self- evident as this seemed to he to me, the Societv did not see it in the same light ; nor did they accept my standpoint; they regarded this matter as an open question, or as a matter of ophiion ; and hence that the opinion of one should not constrain the opinion of another; whereas 1 did not so regard it; for if it had been, they would have been clearly right; but 1 took higher ground; I recognized the New Church as the Lord's, and not ours ,• and that He had Himself nuide and estabhshed tlie Law and the order of His own Churcli, which neitlur 1, nor any one else could set aside at our pleasure; hence it was not a matter either of our own choice, or our own conscience; and that the order of the Divine economy was, that there were two Sacraments which were the symbolic types of the Church, re- spectively called /^/^j^j.sm, and the Stijtpcr ; these, in the writings of the Church are called the two Gates to eternal life ; one the outer, and the other the inner; the outer Gate being liaptism, and the inner Gate the Supper; ; and that the inner Gate can only be reached by tirst passing through the outer, unless it be done by scaling the wall, or climbing up some other way. But no person is compelled to enter either of them ; though if he desires to do so, it must not be done by violence to the Divine order. :1 •T ■ (: 236 THE SOCIETY DEMORALIZED. And the Clmrcli is tlio ciistoilian and guardian of the J)ivine Law, and has im y'lifhl to permit it, knowingly, to he invaded. Thus, recognizing it as a Dic'iHc Laic, hoth Minister and Society are ahke amenahle to it; and no one should claim the right to set it aside. This was the ground I took; hut the eyes of the Society were holden, so that they could not see it; they, however, respected mij vision, and were will- ing that I should act upon my own convictions of the truth; and as I hoped and helieved that they would soon pass out of this transition state, I accepted their call to become the Pastor of the Society, as soon as I could make the necessary arrangements to return to Detroit ; this, however, I was not able to do before the 2;h-d day of October, 185(5, and commenced preaching on th;* Sunday follownig ; the Society then met for worship in the Churcli (formerly Congregational), at the corner of Jefferson Avenue and 13eaubien street ; Avliich they had unfortunately contracted to purchase whilst I was in St. Louis. — It was now past the time, when the annual meeting of the Michigan Associa- tion should have been held ; and no steps had been taken towards it : indeed it had so run down that Dr. Drake in writing to me about it, had said, " I think it is in a comatose condition at present ; if not moribund ; and unless you get here soon I fear our Society will foUow from inanition." 1 therefore, by concurrent action of the Society, sent out circu- lar notices to as many as couhl be reached in the State, inviting them to meet in Detroit, on Friday, CENTENARY OF TirE NEW CHIRCH. '237 that I if fear "ore, re li- the ilay, November Ttli (18r;<)j, at Avliicli time the l;5tli An- nual moetini; wiis lield: the attendance was ne- ■cessarilv smnll : liut it served as a lij^atiire by which it was held to^^other. Tlie following year (1857), was the close of the first centenary of the New Church : the Convention behijjj hidd that year in Cincinnati, it was commemoratid l)y addresses delivered there by ^fessrs. AV. ]>. Ihiydeii, T. Wor- cester, T. 1). Ilaywnrd, A. Silver. C. Giles, J. Pettee, J. 11. Hibbard, T. Storry, .1, P. Stuart, and myself ; from the clergy; and IMissrs. S. iiccd, J. Y. Scam- mon and N. F, Ca])ell, from the Laity ; the sub- jects were Swedenborg, the Last Judguient, Ibc New Jerusalem, and Permanence of the New Church. Successive Churches, Freedom, Education and Literature, ^ly subject was " Tlie Progress of the Ages.'" These were suljsequently jublished in a volume, < ntitied " Centenary Addresses." On Sunday. .)uly l'2tli (1857', the Society used the church on Jefferson Avenue for the last time, having, as tluy believed effected a sale for it, and thus r('li( vtd tlumselves of a great incumbrance. Tlu' n( \t Sal»lialh. tlie UKU'liiig for worship was held at uiy house : and the following day a num- ber of my friends Kindly came to see me oil, and l)id me (lod-speed, on a visit to Lugland, where j was about two inonths in attending tlie centenary celebration of the New Cliurcli dining the session of the (leueral Conference, held that year at Man- chester ; and revisiting old sci-nes, friends and relatives, lleturned to Detroit, on Saturday P.^L, September, 'iOth, and preached the following day i I j ! .[■' 238 SIXTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING. in the new hall (No. 15 Woodward Avenue, a little north of the Campius Martins), wliich the Society had leased for two years, during my absence, and fitted it up with seats, &e. for public worship. It was a front room, up one pair of stairs, narrow, and not very easy of access. The following month (October), the IGth Annual meeting of the Associa- tion was held in Detroit. Owing to my absence, and but recent return from England, but little had been done by way of recuperating it from its pre- vious decline ; but this being the Centennial year an effort was now made to re-invigorate and restore it. There were visitors present from Jackson and Portland i^Iowa Co.) and Chicago: and ])r. A. E. Small, of Chicago, by special invitation delivered an able historical address on the first and second coming of the Lord, on Friday evening, October 23rd (1857), and on the following Sunday morning I entered into a more specific detail of the succes- sive steps of progress which characterized the coming of the new age in which we are now living, as the result of that second coming of the Lord ; and in the evening I delivered a Lecture on the relation of Emanuel Swedenborg to the Church of the New Jerusalem, and the memorable epoch of 1757. These discourses were publislied in neat pamphlet form, together with the Proceedings of the Association : as also a " Public declara- tion and announcement to the Christian World'' respecting the claims of the New Church to their attention and consideration ; briefly stat- ing what had been done, and what was now i < mgs •Id" to stat- now LECTURES REPEATED FIFTH TIME. 23» in progress ; concluding with tliese words : — " Gradually and slowly, but surely, tliese Doctrines are permeating Society ; they have been embraced with earnestness and affection by such as are in the love of truth for its own sake, and for the good to which it leads ; and by men in every walk of life. The ignorance ond bigotry which first assailed them are either hiding their heads in shame, or seeking other objects of attack : the greatest foe we now encounter is indifference ; and this perhaps, rather because we are classed with the religious world at large, than because our Doctrines are appreciated, — and therefore neglected, &c." To this was added a brief synopsis of what we do not believe : and what we do believe. In December following it was thought desirable that I should deliver my Course of Lectures on the Creation of the Universe, &c., a lifth time in the City ; and the Young Men's Hall was engaged for that purpose ; a formal application having been made to me to that effect, signed by many of the leading men in the City. Previous however to their delivery, I published in the Jhdly Advertiser a brief statement of the circumstances which gave rise to the pro- duction of these Lectures ; and the places at which I had delivered them. The first Lecture of the Course was given on Saturday Dec. I2th to an audience of about 500 persons ; admission to the Lectures was by Ticket, (single Lecture 25 cents). They were not all equally well attended ; still they seemed to awaken a very lively interest in the ;t- ^40 SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL MEETING. >• minds of many, and tliis time tlioy mi;t with no (outward) opposition, as tlioy had dono when de- livered hero ten years hefore. At tlie annual meet- ing of the Society, held in January 18ij8, lifteen months after my return to Detroit, a Resolution was adopted offering to renew my engagement at the reduced sum of $()()(). 00 a year. This was done after three months of the year had expired, and without a word of iirevious notice ! The Society had urgently pressed me to come but a little more than a year hefore; and had agreed to pay me $700.00 a year : I paid all my own expenses in removing, disposed of my property at considerable loss in order to do so ; and now, at the end of the first yearit was reduced to i^OOO.OO, although the Society had very considerably in- creased in numbers during this time, it is true there had been a great commercial panic, and all business had suffered in conse(]uence — but if all had been laithhil to their ability there would have been no mnd of this defection : on the contrarv, the subscriptiims might have been increased. In October (1858) the 17th Annual meeting of the Association was held at Jackson, at which there were now del(>gates and visitors from Detroit, Dexter, INEai'^hall, St. Clair, Charlotte, Pewamo, Little Prairie llonde, Eckford, Ypsilanti, ]3arnum, Adrian, Dover, and Jackson, Mich. ; and Laporte, Ind. Letters were also received and read from Kev. A. Silver, Rev. H. N. Stroiig, Rev. Rich. Hooper, ^fr. W. 1^. Morton, (Almont), N. ]3igelow, <Springlield), Dr. Shepard (Grand Rapids), Mr. E. NUMBERS AT CIIUUCII AND SCHOOL. 241 111 ere Iroit, I1.U10, mm, brte, I'rom lich. [low, •. E. Bailey (Portland) and Mr. Jacob Silver (Cassapolis); all of an encouraging kind; and the Secretary of the Detroit Society said that that Society had, during the past year " been marked by an unusual increase of members, and attendants u[)on public worship :" we have, he says, preaching in the morning of every Sabbath, with an average attend- ance of about one hundred and twenty-live persons : Sunday Schiol in the afternoon, witli an average attendance of thirty-iive children and seven teachers. We have also a Doctrinal Class after Sunday school, which is attended by about twenty-five persons," &c. The Rev. Jabez Fox had, at this time returned to Michigan, and was Pastor of the Society at Jackson. The Secretary in concluding his Report of this Session of the Association says, " Thus closed one of the most pleasant and useful meetings of this Association that had bcien held for several years past." But alas, a seed of discord was again sown, which not only foreboded, but also produced, troul)le and division in the Association, which soon terminated in its dissolution. It was the 6ne 1 had been so solicitous to guard against in the Detroit Society ; and whi(di I had liopcd wouLl not present itself again ; it was the virtual repudiation of the Sacra- ment of Baptism in the New Church ; it being re- garded as a merely human institution which might be observed or not, at the option of the novitiate who should claim the privilege of partaking of the Sacrament of the Supper ; and was altirmed that the Church had no right to protect the Table of the \\ J^' I 242 ENEMY SOWING TARES. 1 j f i II Lord by the Gatewliich the Lord Himself had pro- vided and commanded. It was the old Church idea, from which they were not yet lib* rated, tiiat Baptism was bnt a formal, or ecclesiatical mode of reception into the Church ; and as that outward form was similar in the Now CI lurch to the old ; it was but a repetition of it ; anii hence not necessary ; not seeing or acknow- led^n'ng that the very essential of this form is just as different from that of the former ]3a)itism as the Doctrines of the New Church are from those of the Old ; for it is the ])octrine which is professed to be believed in at Bai)tism that gives it its virtue. Yet because this was not seen, it could not be acknow- ledged. But I believed that that light had come to me, and I could not be so recreant as to be unfaith- ful to its teachings. And because I could not, the enemy took advantage of it, and came and sowed his tares there ; and they soon began to grow. My mind was greatly disturbed at this, and I did all I could to explain it. After the meeting had adjourn- ed I wrote a letter to the members and i^rofessed receivers of the Doctrines in the Association, which I had printed, and sent them each a copy for their consideration and investigation, before the next annual meeting should be held. ]3ut no one r('i)lied to it, because no one could gainsay it ; so I awaited the result ; and meanwhile prepared my next Ad- dress, so as more specifically to meet this ques- tion from every point of. view from which it could be seen ; and when fhe 18th annual meeting of Ihe Association was held at Marshall, in October 1859, I delivered it. COMMITTKK ON " ADDRESS." 243 vvre nal, •ch ; New '. it; 110 vv- just stlie f the to be . Yet vnow- me to faith- t, the owed My 1 all I ourn- fessed which their next (■plied Aiiited t Ad- quc'S- could of the 1859, At the cloae of tlie Addross tho siil)ject of it was discusf^ed by Messrs. Fox, EHis, Fariisworth, Lail)le, Hatch, Dodge, Dewing, Smith, llaininoiid, myself, and others: and various Uosolutioiis and Subsitiites were pro[)Ose(l in re:^ard to it, which either avoich'd meeting the [)oints presented, or else virtually admitted them ; but deijhued to a'loi)t them. Finally the following Ui'solution was a'l()[)!i- ed by a vote of thirteen to six : — 'I'hat it be ret\'rred to a Committee of seven to report at the next An- nual meeting ; and the Chair was requested to nomi- nate that Committee. And as I was in the Chair, I nominated seven persons, all of whom 1 bdi'V.d to be opposed to the views [)r('senteil in my Adlress. When that Committe re[)orted, instead of doing as the mover of the Uesolutiou re'[uired, /. c, that they " be instructed to reply to tiie arguments, and [)re- sent the op[)Osite side;" ihi^y did nnt repJi) to <inii one of them ; nor even notice thera : although the mover himself was one of that Committee. They found the arguments were unanswerabln ; and so did not attempt it!* And yet, so determined were they not to adopt it, that, probably regarding discre- tion as the better part ot valor ; they contented themselves by presenting the following as a reply to perhaps the fullest and most coni[)rehensive and exhaustive argument on that subject that has vet been written, viz : "Your Committee, to wiiora was referred the Address of ilie Presiding Minister ou the subject of Baptism, would simply report unani- *'J'hia Addross will bo found in full iu tlio A^)peudix to tUose Romiuiacencea. It I r - ir V i i j i|^ t 1 i: ! [ 244 RKCA STATION OF KRUOn. r ! ri ii I •! moMsly, that tlioy believe the AsHOciation oupiht not to exclude from tlie lloly Siipi)t'r any person of good life, who in a receiver of the II(!aveniy Doc- trines ; and who heheves that he has been truly baptized." — Signed by the Committee. I forbear to give their names, as 1 think they would hardly like to see them appended to anch (( reply to the arguments of the Addrcsss ; the more especi- ally as one of them, in a subsequent Report from the Detroit Society to the Association, says, that the constitution of that Society has been so worded "that there can be no doubt as to the proper mode of entrance into the Society of the Church ; and now it distinctly states that persons desiring to become members, must ih*st be bai»tized into the faith of the] New Church, if not already 80 baptized; and we believe the future prosperity of the Church would be advanced by the Associa- tion taking ecpially affirmative grounds upon the same question." — October, 18(52. And on the following year another of the signers of that memorabli! reply to the arguments prest-nted in my Address, gave notice of the following amendment to the Constitution of the Association, viz.; that "no person shall be entitled to a vote in ecclesiastical matters who is not a member of the New Church," meaning thereby, l)aptiz(;d into the faith of that Church. And the next year ♦' tution was so revised, as to contain II i. It must have been seen so ur. )y t se who gave any attention to the b gect v .itever, that to con- tend against it was but an fort to repudiate and THK DIVINI-; LAW AND OUDKIi. '2t5 lo gave to con- Lte and set aside ; or at least, not to endorsci and ado[)t a law of Divine order and couiinandmtnt ; but to permit any candidate for admission into the Church to prescribe and determine the manner in which the Church should admit him! — or, if any condi- tion was required it was, either that the candidate should say for himself " I am a person of good life ;" or to be /</w.vc//'satislied that lie is a receiver of the Heavenly Doctrines ; and that his baptism into the belief in a tripersonal God, the Vicarious Atone- ment &c. &c., was just the same as being biiptized into an acknowli'dgment of the Faith of the New Church ! — In the one case the man jtidfics hiniHel/; in the other, the Society sits in judgment on the qnalitt/ of his life; or else \w. breaks down the hedge, and tramples upon it ; or climbs up some other way to get into th(j Vincjyard ! whereas all that the Church has any right to do, is to see that the Law of the Divine order is complied with ; and to instruct the candidate what that Law and order is ; for "not one of the stakes thereof shall ever be removed ; neither sliall any of the cords thereof be broken." — But they ircir broken and removed, for, although there was an outward compliance with the Divine Law, there was but too evidently an inward repugnance to it, which induced a state of aliena- tion and disalfection towards those who maintained it. This eventually became so marked as to pro- duce an unbrotherlv state of feeling, even amount- ing to discourtesy and intolerance ; till, feeling un- able to bear the pressure any longer, on the 1st day of January IHO'), I resigned my Pastoral re- %. (It' II 1 I ■ 1 li < i 24G EFFOUT TO IIESUKCITATE. lation to the Detroit Society, and in the following Octol»or, when the Association met at Grand rkai)ida, I announced my intention not to accept any ollice therein, and so retired from it ; and this was i)ractically the last time the Association ever met, for thou^^h it was afterwards called to meet at Detroit, there were not a suflicient numher of persons in attendance to make it seem desirahle even to open the Church doors ! Thus, after twenty- five years of earnest and lahorious effort to huild u}) the Church in Mi^diif^nn, did this Associa- tion, once so flourishing, and with such hopeful prospects, pass away into oblivion, with the things that were; and because "freedom" is so clearly recognized in the New Church, it was strained into the persuasion that every man is a law to himself, and that he is free to remove the J)ivine landmarks. An att( nipt was made eleven years afterwards, (in September, 1877), to resuscitate the Michigan Association, but as there was still the same hostile feeling towards the Divine Law concerning the Sacranunts, Hjpy had so far removed themselves Iron' tlie means by which tlie Divine Providence could aid them, that nothing was accomplished, for '• except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain." But 1 have somewhat anticipated events. After the adjournment of the r7th annual nuieting of the Association, which was held at Jackson, in October, 1858, I continued preaching to the Society at Detroit, on the Sabbath, and Lecturing and preach- ing at various [daces within the Association whore LECTUHES AT PITTSBURG. 247 there were small, or incipient societies, besides occasionally visiting contii^uoas places in Ohio. This I continued to do for two years, till I left Detroit, October 15th, ISUO, for a three months en- gagement at St. Louis, (Mo.) During this timi^ I delivered four lectures at Vermillion, (Ohio), on the Doctrines of the New Church ; one at Niles, (Mich.), on Modern Spiritualism ; nine at South Bend, (Ind.), on the Creation and its relation to Genesis, and a sermon on the true idea of God. Three Lectures at Pewamo, (Midi.), on the leading Doctrines : one at Lyons, on Heaven and Hell ; seven at Davisburgh, (two visits) ; three at Marshall, (two visits) ; eleven at Berrien, (two visits) ; one at Flat Rock, (a funeral sermon) ; three in the town of Berlin, (near Almont) ; three at Holly, and two at Port Huron. Besides which on the 5th of February, I com- menced the delivery of a Cours;; of nine Lectures at Lafayette Hall, Pittsburg, on the Creation of the Universe, and the first eleven chapters of Genesis; and preached three times in Apollo Hall, to the Society meeting for worship th -re. After which I went to Philadelphia and repeated the same Course there in the Haydn and Handell Hall. The notices in tlie public press in both these cities were not only favorable, but highly eulogistic. The Editor of the Pilttihiu'fi DispdtcJi said, " We were glad to find a respectable and intelligent audience assembled at Lafayette Hall, to hear the introductory Lecture of Mr. Field's Course, on " The Creation of the Universe." It is but little indeed to say that it 1! i\ f ' )' . u 248 EDITORIAL NOTES. was a most delightful one, as evinced by the ab- sorbed attention of the audience. The Lecturer is a man of sound, deep learning, beyond all ques- tion, very sincere, and full of his great theme, with all the power of expression and elucidation necessary, clearly to convey his meaning to his hearers. We can assure all who attend that the fault will be their own if they are not thrice com- pensated for the time, and trifling expense of at- tending the Course of Lectures. Don't miss one Lecture of the Course." After a subsequent Lecture, the Editor says: "We have rarely felt so well repaid for the time spent at a public entertainment. In fact nis Lec- tures are calculated to set every faculty of the mind in most active exercise, in the attempt to grasp the great theme so finely presented by the learned speaKer. Jle affords a stock of informa- tion scarcely to be obtained in years of reading, and appears perfectly master of his subject." In Phila- delphia the Press not only pul)lished a very copious abstract of each Lecture, but, among other favor- able comments, said, " The vast amount of scien- tific knowledge brought to bear upon this immense theme by the gifted Lecturer, is a matter of won- der and admiration with all who hear him. They are at once intensely interesting and instructive." In the lieport of the Pennsylvania Association to the General Convention, in 18(K), the President says, " In February last Eev. George Field visited our State and delivered two Courses of Lectures ; one in Pittsburg, and the other in Philadelphia. ij TEMPLE ON MACOMB AVENUE. 249 itc'd Ilia. These Lectures excited much interest in the puhlic mind, and were listened to hy attentive audiences, constantly increasinpj in number, until the last, when the room (Haydn and llandell Hall), was crowded to its utmost capacity : and mucli regret was expressed that Mr. Field's engagements would not permit a repetition of liis Lectures in Philadel- phia. \Vliilst delivering these Lectures in Phila- delphia on week-day evenings, I went to Wilming- ton, (Delaware, ) every Sunday, by invitation of the Society, and preached there four times. Put these excursions in tlie East are rather an ei)isodo to the intent and purpose of these Pieminiscences of the commencement of the establishment of the New Church in the Wist. On the28rd of March, 1800, I returned to Detroit, and continued preaching in the Pvoom on Woodward Avenue; and in the follow- ing ^lay, d. divert d three Lectures at Holly. About this time arrangements were commenced to be made for changing a small double cottage, owned by the Society, on ^lacomb Avenue into a house of 1 ublic Worship, which was eli'ected at an (xpeuse of $000.00; and on Sunday, August 2Gtli, IHGO, it was duly opened and dedicated ; my text on this occasion l.eing from Is. xl: 5. " The Glory of Jehovah sliall be revealed, and all flesh shall see together; for the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken." Previous to dedication, an explanation was given of the correspondence and use of external forms wdien thev embodied internal thoughts and feedings ; and also why the Woao of tue Loud Bhoukl have a special place in the House of the H II f jiiL 1 t\ \ V I 1 il ». I, m 250 REVISIT ST. LOUIS. Lord ; and of the Sacraments of the Church ; and of the order of worship. The next month (September), I delivered two discourses at Port Huron ; and one month later I again left l)(;troit on a three months missionary visit to St. Louis (Mo.), where I repeated my Course of Lectures on the Creation, &c. (a full ab- stract of each lecture being published in the St. Louis Republican) ; and preached and lectured on the Sabbaths. Whilst I was in St. Louis, the Micliigan Association hold its 19th session in Detroit (October 19th, 20th and 21st, 18(10). There was a very good attendance, about twenty persons, outside of Detroit were present, from Jackson, Kalamazoo, St. Clair, Marshall, Flat Rock, Monroe, Almont, Ypsilanti, and La Porte, Ind. llev. Jabez Fox was the presiding minister— also chaplain of the State prison at Jackson — and acting, when- ever priicticable, as the Missi(mary of the Associa- tion ; as also had llev. G. N. Smith of Grand Rapids been so acting, but who had now left the State. The services in Detroit during my absence were conducted by one of the members of the Society, iiefore leaving St. Louis I received an earnest and cordial invitation to again become the Pastor of their Society ; but for various reasons it did not seem best to nie to accept it ; and so lelt St. Louis on the 21st of January, 18G1, after a very pleasant visit, Jind again returned to Detroit, where, ci the 3rd of February following I recom- menced preaching : but soon after made another Missionary visit to Vermillion (Ohio), where 1 de- n NOT TO PREACH ON BAPTISM. 251 livored nine Lectures on the Doctrines of the New Church. Soon after I went to JJuffcalo (N. Y.), and delivered my Course of Lectures on the Creation, Deluge, &c., part of them in the American Hall ; and a part in the Kremlin Hall : returning to Detroit, and preaching there again on the 24th of March. ;;, Tiiese various places I visited, alforded me main- ly the means for my support, whilst my time anu lahor was chiefly devoted to the cause of the New Church in Detroit. There had l)een at this time, as I have already stated, an intensely hostile feeling on the part of a few of the more active members of the Society, against requiring as a condition of meml)ersliip, or of admission to the Sacrament of the Supper, that the candidate sliould lirst make a profession of his faith in the fundamental Doctrines of the New Church ; and be baptized into that faith ; and everv elTort was made that could l)e nuide, to induce m(i to forego this condition ; but as this was found to be unavailing, the Society passed a lie- solution exju'essing a " retjuest that (I) sliould not preach on the subject of re-baptism, either dirt!ctly or indirectly, without ex[)resHly stating that his (my) views on that subject, are not the views of the Society " ! What a request was this f(n* the Society to make; and to embody it in a Resolntion/ es- pecially after the Society had nuide this a consti- tutional requirement. 1 did all that 1 could do; or ought to do, to satisfy them : but my nllegiance to the Lord, and to His Commandments ranked higher than my obedience to them ; and because M i!i H l» 252 VALEDICTORY SKRMON. I would neither bow clown my knee to Baal ; nor recognize their repudiation of one of the Sacra- ments of the Church, a hitter feeling was engen- dered which was continually manifesting itself in faultfindings and accusations ; till the sphere be- came so unpleasant ; and my usefulness so abridged, that I believed it would be better for me to retire. I did so ; and on Sunday, July 14th, 18G1, 1 delivered my valedictory. In that sermon, I said, " It lacks six weeks of one year since this temple was 0[)eni'd and de(licat<'d ; and yet, several times since tlieu I have thought that I was entering tliis [)ul[)it for the last time : but I havt' never felt this so fully as I do to day. It is a singular co-incidence too th:it it was on this very day (-Tuly 14th). seventeen years ago, that I preached my first sermon in Detroit ; and when I look baek on all thr dtiys tliiit have passed since then and sec; thai, of all those who then attended our meetings for worslii[)^ — that I alone am left! it fills me with a sadness I cannot express ; nor can I well resist the thoughts that arise from my heart. More than eleven years ago one or two influential and dissatisfied persons made so nuieli trouble and difficulty in the Society, making my services (though gratuitous), so un- acceptable that I resigned my office as pastor of the Society, and left the city and the state. J3ut six vears after I was recalled, and urgentlv re- quested to resume my former [)astoral duties ; many of you can remember tliis time ; and how for a long time the Societv seemed to flourish and prosper ; and you can remember the many, and LAST WORDS. 253 lio I lOt Ill- of 5ut •0- ()\V m\ U(l pleasant, and liapi\v meetinj];8 we have had together. You will often think of our social parties, — our pic-nics, and other festive gatherings ; and I shall not fail to rememher the kindly tokens which I have more than once received at your hands. But evil times came upon us ; and, as in 1850, so also in 18G0, similarly disturhing causes occurred to mar the peace, and arrest the progress of the Society. Again there is discontent ; and either direct, or indirect eftbrts have for some time heen made to silence my preaching; and the Society are either willing or indift'erent. It is very sad; and 1 feel it very discouraging and disheartening. 1 have given my whole heart to this Society ; it was ray first charge ; and, as far as my own wishes were concerned, would have heen my only one. I have had many other calls; l)ut have declined them all for this. Amid all discouragements, against all opposition, I liave struggled onward, so long as there was anyone to sustain me ; and if 1 have not accomplished much, it was not from want of will- ingness, hut inability." And after expressing my earnest hopes for the future prosperity of the Society, I thus concluded niv farewell sermon: *' May the Lord guide you; may He give you the disposition, — the earnest, seli-sacrilicing disposi- tion, to do right, and to do good; and may He hless you in your eft'orts to do it." In delivering this Sermon I never again expect- ed to preach from that pulpit; but the whole ex- perience of my life has been that man proposes, but God disposes. 1 did not leave Detroit at this if I I I 254 PARTING ADDIiESS. M I'll 1 1 time ; I had no where else to go; indeed I did not desire to go anywhere ; I rather wanted rest and relief; so, with the exception of a visit to Hull- prairie, Ohio, to which I was invited hy the Ohio Association about a year afterwards, where I de- livered two Discourses ; and another visit to Davis- burgh, Mich., where 1 also preached twice, I em- ployed myself in attending to my own personal affairs, and so awaited the ordering of the Divine Providence. Ten davs after the deliverv of the above f-'ermon, I received the following memorial, which I shall ever preserve and cherish, as the kindly testimony of regard, which, notwithstanding ad- verse inliuences, was still entertained towards me, and which 1 thus put on record. "Detroit, July 24th, 1861. liEv. George Field : — Dear Sir, — The undersigned, members of the New Church and Congregation in Detroit, have heard with regret that there is a probability of your ceasing to be Pastor of the Society ; and they can- not permit such an event to take place without giving expression to their views and feelings on the sul)ject. It is said that actions speak louder than words ; and we must acknowledge that all your actions shew tiiat you have had the good of the Society at heart fro;n its first foundation, when you worked faith- fully without fee or reward, until you saw it increase in numbers, and in strength : then you no doubt felt grateful to the giver of all good for having so blessed your labors, iiut evil times came, slight oai)t ig so light OF MEMBEUS AND OTHERS. 255 differences being imagined into grave and serious ones, until they now threaten the dissolution of the Society ; or at least, to snap the tie that has bound you and it together : but however it may end, be assured that for one moment we have never doubted the sincerity and purity of your motives ; nor, tliat the good of the Society was the end you had in view. Such being our views, be assured that we shall deeply regret any action that shall tend to sever your connection with the Society and Congregation ; and hope that sober, second thought will tend to mollify the feelings of all, and restore us to unity and harmony under your Ministry and leadership again. But, if there is no recoLciliation to take place, the undersigned, wlio have been edified and instructed by you, will always remember you with affection and esteem ; and will [)ray that after having fought the good fight, our Heavenly Father, who knows all our motives, will receive you with, "Well done, good and faithful servant: enter thou into the joy of thy Lord." Alexander Drysdale. Emily L. Davis. Mrs. E. Drysdale. Mary Davis. Mrs. Hannah H.Brennan Mrs. E. Chope. Francis P. Fisher. Mrs. Henrv Seitz. Mrs. C. Fisher. Edward Chojie. Mrs. Anna Mathison. William Mocre. Henry. A. Sealey. Mary Sealey. Jane Sealey Jane A. Labram. Harriet Lahram. Mrs. Alex. iMathison. C. F. Davis. Mrs. J. B. Wayne. J. B. Wayne. Henrietta J)arrow. Mary A. Battisoii. Julia Pattison. James Bothwell. H. Benson. if ' ^ \ III 25G INVITATION TO UETUUN. But tlio iidverso influences prevaih'd ; and tlie separsition remained; the Society becoming more disunited and demorali/ied ; and ho continued for more than a vear. About threo monthH from the above date, i. e., on Friday, Oct. 18th, 18G1, the 20th Annual meeting of the Micliigan Association commenced its session at Kahimazoo. There were present Rev. Jabez Fox, who still continued to l)e Chaplain of the State Prison at Jackson ; as well as Pastor of the small New Church Society in that City : — Kev. G. N. Smith, of Grand Rapids ; and about a dozen other persons, including those residing in Kalamazoo. Nothing of much importance seems to have i)een done. About nine months afterwards, (piite unexpectedly, I received the following notice of a Resolution un- animously adopted at a meeting of the Detroit So- ciety held on the 8th day of July, 18()2 ; viz : Itesolccd, — That the Society hereby cordially in- vite the Rev. George Field to become its Pastor ; and from this date. J. B. Wayne, Sec. July 7th, 18G2. This was accompanied by an earnest request that I would accept the invitation. To this in due time I re[)lied, and after expressing my acknowh dgments, and presenting for consideration the imi)ortance of united and concurrent action between Society and Pastor, 1 add, " The welfare and prosperity of a Society cannot long continue to exist unless they are founded upon acknowledged principles and actions, in which both Pastor and Society wholly i MY REPLY. 257 111- ttor ; k liat 1 ine I ?nts, Ice of and [of a Itliey anil II oily and unconditionally agree. If not so, a tearing and rending aaunder must .sooner or later occur ; not only ia this true in principle, but all experience has proved it to bo 80 in practice. 1 jiold it there- fore to be essentially and absoluttdy necessary to the continued advancement of any Society, not only that the Pastor and peo[)le are mutually agreed ; but that they are so — not on grounds of policy or expediency merely, but on the clear and distinct teaching of the Wohd, and the Doctrines of the Church ; which shall be recognized as the final authority on every subject where opinions or pre- judices may be in opposition." I then illustrate tuis, by shewing the incongruity which existed in the Society on the subject of Baptism. They required it, as a pre-re({uisite con- dition of membership, but were indifferent as to what faith the candidate had made a profession of, claiming that if he, (the candidate), believed that the baptism " into a false and idolatrous faith " was the proper Gate of introduction into the Church of the New Jerusalem, the Pastor and Society should so far respect his convictions as to recognize it also ! " because the sign and the seal of that false faith were similar to the one used in testi- fying to a true faith!'" If I say, " the New Church was a .sect of the old, having a faith in common therewith, then no new Baptism could be necessary, because there would bo no new faith to confirm and testify to. But the New Church is not a sect of the old ; nor has it a faith in common ' therewith ; and baptism is but tho sign and seal to the faith of R !!! I .t 258 rilOPOHAL TO UNITK. Jill n the Church, a faith wliicli is taupilit, and to he ac- knowlodfJicd andconfcKsod at tlie Door of admission into the Churcli; or, as Swodonhorfi; says, ** Biip- tisra is introduction into the Cliristian Church," not the consuniniatcd Church, which he says "was Christian only in name ; hut not in essence and reahty," (T. C. H. G(i8) : hut the True Christian Church, — which is the Ni<;w Chukcu. — More to the same effect I also stated, and concluded my remarks on thissuhject hy saying'. "These positions are, or ou^lit to he self-evident to the mind of every New Churchman ; and the only wonder in times to come will he, that it was possihle that any man in the light of the New Churcli could ever for a moment have thought otherwise." I next adverted to, and dwelt upon the importance of a mutual recognition of the Ministerial Oftlce; its duties and functions, — the Pulpit and the Pastoral office, and concluded by saying, " If the Society are prepared to concur with me in the above, and thus to unite with me in a renewed effort to advance the spiritual prosperity and welfare of our beloved Church in this city, I shall be ready and willing to do all that is in my power to accomplish it, for I feel that I have already stood idle too long, and that I ought to be at my proper work." But the Society did not concur either with the Spirit, or the letter of the views I had submitted to them ; l)ut by Eesolution, adopted by a vote of ten to two, affirmed that they differed and dissented ** more or less" from them, " yet being desirous to promote the harmony and highest good of our ON A KALHK I'UINCIPLK. 259 .ions. Aided oncur ue in )erity •ity, I in my heady at my ii the Imitted /ote of jsented lous to )f our Society, and the; Church ; witliout pivsuminp; to know what course, under tlie circumt'tances will hest promoto these ends ; do now, in accordance with our present hest judj^nicnt, waivo all differences of oi)inion and disHcntinfj; views to Afr. Field's conditions and views ; and agree to hold them in abeyance ; to the intent that Mv. Field and the Society may co-operate; together harmoniously, and in peace in the performance of the uses of the Church ; and on our part ask only to he regarded as those referred to in No. 318, of the Heavenly Doetrines i. c. " He who believes otherwise than the priest, and makes no disturbance, ought to be left in peace ;" and thus leave to time, and the future, by a peaceful process, the harmonizing of our views and opinions, as far as may be;, with those of the Pastor upon the subjects involved." But declining to so alter the Constitution as to make it accord with them; though discountenancing "any controversy in opposition to" them. To- gether with these ilesolution, of the Society, I re- ceived the earnest and cordial expression of the Secretary that I would accept this compromise ; he regarding it as a " golden o[)portunity" for re- conciling and uniting tlie Society in a common cause. But all the convictions of my reason ; and all the knowledge 1 had accpiired in the experiences of the past, told mo otherwise ; and I felt distressed and pained, that instead of closing up the gulf that was between us ; the effort was rather to build a temporary bridge across it. In my reply to them I express my regret that professing as we both do, i 'II i'h < ■ II irS DIFFICULril'TS AND DANGERS, U .•^0 acknowledge the supreme and absolute authority and teaching of the Divine Word; and the Doctrines of the New Church ; yet that when they are ap- pealed to, their authority is evaded, and held m abeyance ! And what is professedly regarded as the Pastor's opinions, or perhaps his prejudices, is allowed to rule, rather than the Divine Law ! For 1 said, "Your standpoint seems to be that it is the Society's church ; and that they have the right to make just such Laws of order and government for it as they please. Whereas 1 contend that it is not their Church, any more than it is mine ; and that neither of us have any such privilege, when the Lord Himself has established and revealed His own Lp.sv of Divine order. Our duty is only to learn and obey it. The positions, (I said) upon which I stand, arc either right or wrong : if they are right, on what pretence do you refuse to make them obligatory '? If they are wrong, by what authority do you permit me, and co-operate v/ith me, in doing them '?" Instead of understanding for themselves, ! say, " You take shelter behind the fact that some few men of mark in the New Church hiv f^ held opinions different to mine ; and therefore assert that they are open questions!" But I add, ** The same men have repudiated the New Church priesthood ; the New Church Convention ; and the p.'ithority of Swedenborg; and therefore these ought also to be open (piestiona, to for ever disturb the peace of the Church. But, (I say,j neither these men ; nor any other men, have ever disproved ; or attempted to disprove the position which jrr-'"£^-?"a£- ANP INCONSISTENCIES. 261 hority jtrineB re ap- . as the ices, is t \ For at it is lie right irnmeGt ,liat it is ne ; and o'c, when jaled His I only to ^id) upon if they to make \)y what irate with ..nding for [ehind the ,w Church therefore [i3ut I add, iW Church 1^; and the hese ought inturb the .ther these disproved ; lion which I have taken on New Church Baptism : nor can it ever be done." I then refer by name, to several of those who hold this to be an open question, whom I had invited, and even challenged to refute my positions respecting it; but who had never attempted. One of them having " acknowledged my position to be incon- trovertible; though, he said, what use was it, when people made up their minds not to admit it." Two others had said, that if it "-3 admitted that l^aptism is a)t external imVinmice of tin- Church, then my position 7conld he 'nnprecjnahU'. And then I ask» how is it met by the Society? '' With an admis- sion of its truthfulness; and with no attempt to refute it; and yet, "at the same time with a de- claration that they will not adopt it ! " Is such a course, I ask, " calculated to be productive of good results '?" or be "the one step that shall once more make this Society feel united, instead of (lieing) factiously divided ?" It would rather be "a going down to Babylon, instead of going up to Jcrnsal'.'m." And I further way, " I stand within the walls of Jerusalem, and invite all to conie through her <nrn (jati;s ; " and 1 invoke the Society " to uphold ai)d sustain me in this, by all the authority they possess; and 1 will aceept tiieir call, and take my place in a lawful jiud orderly manner.*' And in the strength and earnestness or my ci-n- victious, I mtide this solemn appeal: "May the Lord sustain and strengtlu-n me, as reverently I stand before Him, aeknowledging Illin, and His Law alone, as supreme and absolute. On the 262 PLEADING WITH THEM. Society and their children will be tlic issues, if they decline thus to receive me in His name. I can say no more; my heart is full of foreboding sorrow." Stil) the consequences for the future seemed to me to be so full of importance ; and as this would probal)ly be the last opportunity I might have to plead with them, that I was unwilling to let it pass by without a further effort on my part to shew the fallacy of any merely temi)orizing policy in the vain expectation tliat it would promote either the peace, harmony, or welfart; of the society: for, I said, in tlie course you propose to adopt you '* only speak for yourselves, and for the presenl ,- how can you tell who luay unite with tlie Societ}' with- in a, year, or even six. months. These would not be hound by your [)rotnises; nor would you, your- selvos !)(( bound by them, if any new circumstance should hereafter arise to make you think that you had not acted wisely. What a scene of difiiculties and contentions; or oi" dissatisfaction and separa- tion dofS the begiiniing of such a future present. You cannot have considered it, or you would shrink from its consequences." " What is a society with- out a law as a stan^lard of a[)p 'al and arbitra- ment'?" Then I say, you have already declared yoiu" belief in a Constitutional Law by making it obligatory that a candidate for membership in the Society shall have been ba[)tized ; but seem to be perfectly indifferent as to what faith he was bap- tized into ; appearing to regard it as of no conse- quence whether it was into a belief in a tri-))ersonal TO REACH THEIR UNDERSTANDINGS. 263 s, if !. I iding ed to vould ve to ; pass w the n the 3r the lor, I ' ' only iNV can with- Id not , yo^^r- istance it YOU iciiltiea epava- )rescnt. Hlirink V witli- arbitra- ii'Aared ikin^ it ill the Bii to he as liap- conHO- orsonal God, and a vicarious atonement ; if only the out- ward ceremonial form was passed through ! To me it seemed so marvelous, that in tlie light of the New Church, it should be possible for any one to assume such a position, much less to insist upon it, and conhrm himself in it. ]\[uch more I said ; and I know that my reasons and arguments were unanswerable. There was no attempt to answer them, either then or at any other time : 1 was esto[)ped only as by a dead wall. This reply was sent to the Society, August 4tb, 18G2 ; and ten days afterwaias I received a note from the Secretary to sa,y, that the Society would hold my letter to them under advisement ; and as soon as practicable give me their reply. I know that the Society felt tronbled about it, as well as myself; I liad no reason to think that they wtre not sincere and earnest in the position they had taken ; indeed it was evident to mo tliat they were ; and could 1 have done so, 1 would willingly and gladly have complied with their wishes : but 1 could not; my convictions in regard to it had l)een well expressed l)y Prof. Bush, when he said, (althougl' not in this relation), " It commend sitself to my best reason, as given of God;" " and so believing I dare not confer with flesh and blood." " If then this truth has come to me, and throned itself in the central convictions of my soul ; it brings with it the most sacred obligation '" to bo " faithful to it." — The So:-iel.y had no such conviction to the contrary ; with them it was exclusively a matter of r.rpedicncfj ; hence they never even attempted to shew me that 1 'i ! » i. 264 A COLD ACQUIESCENCE I was wrong ; but in taking this ground, they claim- ed the same right which the Cathohc Church does, to set aside or remove any Divine Law which they may regard as inconverient. After this, instead of investigating my jiosition to see wliether or not it was true or well-founded ; and giving me the reason for their conclusions ; they decided to lay the case before the lievs. T. Worcester ; J. 11. Hibbard, and A. Silver ; and be guided by their advice ! They therefore wrote to them, giving them such informa- tion on the subject as they thought necessary ; and awaited their answers. In due time the answers came ; all of them advising the Society to accept my conditions ; and they did so. On the 24th of September, the Secretary notified me, that the Society had agreed to have their Con- stitution so revised as to make it read : " that Ar- ticle 4, Sec. 2, of the Constitution be so amended as to read, after the word baptized, " into the New Church."* The following llesolution was also adof)ted ; " that when this Society has occasion to resort to Lay reading, a suitable place outside of the Pulpit shall be provided for the same." And with this the de- sire was expressed to know if T would at once resume my pastoral relations to the Soi-iety. It might .seem from this as if I should have been glad that the Society had at last complied with every requirement that 1 had made ; and yet, I do not think I was. i dare say it will be said that I was * This is precisely as the ConBtitution readwheu it was adopt, ed on the 27th of April, 1863. 1 iil AND RENEWAL OF LABORS. 266 ,liat Lay lall de- mme been jvery not was adopt. hard to please ; perhaps it may be so ; and yet I fihould always bo glad to please and to be pleased ; but the reason why I was not so glad on this occa- sion, was, because the Society had not yielded to reason, to evidence and conviction ; but rather to authority, or necessity. In this concession therefore 1 saw but little to rejoice at ; it was not the forerunner of an auspi- cious future. — Of course I accepted it. — In all this discussion no pecuniary considerations ever entered into it. Not a word was said about what the So- ciety was to pay me, — or whether they were to pay me anything ; nor, in any of my relationships to the Society hud that ever been regarded as a lead- ing feature. So after an interval of fifteen months, I, on Sunday, October, 5th 18G2, rc-commeneed my pastoral duties to the Society, my sermon on that c^casion was from these words, " Thine eyes shall see Jerusalem a (juiet habitation : a tabernacle that shall not be taken down : not one of th(; stakes thereof shall ever be removed ; neither shall any of the cords thereof be broken," Is. xxxiii : 20. — i3ut my prognostics had not deceived me ; our Jerusahm was not built " as a city which is united together ;'' nor was there peace within her walls ; and hence was not as yet " a (juiet hai)itation." The old feelings remained, and the ideas which were en- gendered in them : and so, amid a constant con- flict of opinion, 1 labored under great disadvantage for three years more, and on the 20th day of July, 1805, I sent in my resignation again, and on the |i! Iiii III h ism t ( •; I" ''1 i % i ^^H 1 A Ik • 1 !i ' m \d SL. 266 MY LAST WORDS last (lay of that year I preached my farewell sermon from the words of the Psalmist, " We spend our years as a tale that is told." In the course of that sermon I said : — "The life of a man, or of a nation are equally under the operation of the same laws 5 and are amenable to the same results. The principles entering into the government of our Country are those which will sooner or later ripen into fruit; and that fruit will eitli(;r be bitter in the belly ; or sweet as honey in the mouth, according to the ends that it has in view ; and the means it makes use of to accomplish them. And so also in a Society, its growth, its progress, advancement and prosperity, will always be commensurate with the ends it has in view in its formation ; and the means it maki>s use of to accomplish them. If we are in real earnest, that oarnestucss will be visible and manifest in all ourelTorts; — we shall then not be slow to perform our religious duties ; for the manner in which our external acts are performed, are the measures of our real affection for the life that promi)ts tlicni. If we are slow, — indifferent, — late, — cold, or negligent, — our ends will be no better than the means we make use of to accom- plish them. And if our own seliish cares and interests so absorb us, tbat we make our religious duties and obligations altogether secondary and subservient, then we cannot expect them to be very productive, or even healthy. And if the money that we make by this constant absorption of our time to our selhsh interests, is also to be appropriated to equally seliish purposes, AND VAIN EFFORTS. 267 m not the iiied, life ;rent, )C no :oni- and liious O and very Lstant jts, is )08e8, then the moral of the tale of its life will soon he told;" for it will he manifest in its comatose con- dition ; and the little value that it sets upon its acts of puhlic worship. And there is another aspect in which "life is a tale ;" and that is, my own life in relation to this Society; a life which is now heing drawn to its close ; and consecjuently when its moral will have to he nad, and the quality of its fruits tested, as will as the amount, and it mij^lit not he an nnprofitahle lesson to review all the past, and see what has heen the end, and what have heen the means for accon)plishin^i; it. In doing this, whilst 1 readily acknowledge my ineiliciency, — my iiupLrlV'ction, and lack of judguKint, 1 hclieve that I have ever endeavored to act u[)()i; true principles, and true order ; and with a sincere desire to inculcate and establish those; prin- ciples in life, and in worship ; and yet, no one knows better than 1 do, how little i have accomplished; indeed I have often thought my efforts were; an entire failure, so far as I could read results; ai.d no one knows how sincerel}' I have deph red it, and wished that 1 had been more capable, or that those efforts had been better adapted to the desired end." 1 then adverted to what I had said in my inaugural Sermon, (on my return to J)etroit, some nine oi- ten years before); " Upon these duties, ([ had tliiu said), with a con- sciousness of my own weakness and imperfections, do 1 now re-enter, conliding in your forbearance, and in your aid and syrii[)athy to sustain me, to help me, and to bear patiently with me in all i i \i\ 'm 268 HEKKINO REST. ■fill* ■I m my weakness and incompetence. With a willing heart I resura»j my labors among you : this was my first pastoral charge; my wish is (was), that it may also be my last." " Such (I said), were my thoughts and feeling in 1856 ; and I wish they had all remained unchanged to 1866." But they were not so, for I find in my Diary of that datu the fol- lowing entry : " This day terminates my pastoral relation to the Detroit Society, and for forever." My convictions and impressions were so strong that with the influences then ruling that Society I should never be called to minister to it again ; nor did it seem probable that I should be likely to out- live them ; and subsequent events have seemed to fully verify those impressions. My valedictory Sermon was preached on Sun- day, J)ecember 31st, 1865 ; but I remained in De- troit until the 4th day of May, IHIUI. I had no where else to go, and was too weary from the con- flicts and discouragements I had passed through to desir(i to run the hazard of encountering them again ; so I sought and found a quiet home in the retired and pleasant City of Adrian, where 1 should have leisure to carry out an intention I ha I long been contemplating to publish in book form the Course of Lectures I liad so often delivered on the Creation of the Universe, and the Language of the Sacred Scriptures. But I have passed o/er the events which occurred subsequent to October, 1862, when 1 recommenced my pastoral relations to the Society, and my Missionary labors in the Asso- ciation, and its immediate surroundings ; but to A (JENERAL Sl'MMARY. '269 avoid a tedious repetition I will classify and sum- marize them up to tlie time of leaving' the States to go to Canada to live, in September, 1872. In these ten years I made seven visits to Davishurgh and vicinity, (Oakland Co. Mich.,) preaching and lecturing, sometimes twice, and sometimes three times; delivering in all, seventeen Discourses there. In the town of Berlin, Lai)eer Co., during the same time, I went there six times, delivering from one to four Discourses each time; in all iit'teen, besideR attending social gatherings ; these were between the years 18(13 and 18(50. And between IHiV) and 1870, I visited Marshall six times, d< livering in all twelve sermons and lectures ; Strathroy, Canada, live times, delivering twenty-seven Lectures and Sermons ; and Chatham, Canada, four times; delivering nine Lec- tures; Napoleon, Ohio, three times, delivering in all eighteen Lectures and Sermons ; these include the Course of nine Lectures on the Creacion, &c. Two visits to Bowling Green, (Ohio,) where I delivered 17 Lectures, (including my Course on;the Creation). Two in Urbana, in which place I delivered the same Course, — in all 12. Twice in Teeumseh, Mich., (4 Lectures). Twice iu Monroe, (Four): Twice in Wyandotte, (Four) : Twice in Flat Rock ; a funeral Sermon each time. Once in Berrien, where 1 de- livered seven Lectures. And once eaclr at the fol- lowing places, where I either Lectured, or preached as follows, viz : In Adrian, 3 ; (before going to live ther:*); Grandville, 1 ; Grand llapids. 1 ; Jack- son, 9; (on the Creation); Belleiountain, Ohio, 3; Newark, Ohio, 2; Defiance, Ohio, 10; (9 on the 270 F.FFOIITS IN ADRIAN. Creation) ; Marengo, Mich., 1 ; (a funeral Sermon); Charlotte, 10; (also includin;^' the Course on the Creation); lliohmond, Ind., 11 ; Do., (hefore f^oinp; to live there); Laporte, Ind., 2 ; Trafalj^'ar, Ind., 4. Besides preaching and Lecturing at Springfield, Mass., 15 times ; and at Thompsonville, Conn., 9 times ; &c., &c. Soon after removing to Adrian the few receivers in that vicinity commenced meeting at my house, on Sahl)uth mornings for worship ' and on the 17th of Nov., 1860, 1 delivered my Course of nine Lectures on the Creation, in the New Hal), and ahout a year afterwards, (Nov. lOth, 1807), commenced Sunday evening Lectures on the Doc- trines of the New Church in a commodious lioom we had fitted up for the purpose in the Masonic Temple ; and the following January \vc also met there in the mornings for Sahhath worship ; and about tlie same time commenced holding (,)uarterly meetings, at which our New Church friends from the surrounding country (in Mich., Ind. and Ohio), at- tended ; when the Sacraments were administered. These continued to January, 1809, soon after which time I left Adriail for Richmond , Indiana.* The ri':! *Haviiif» beta vory frequently requested t/ publish in Book form, my Course of Lectures on the Creation of the Universe^ and the meaniu]f« of the syinliolic imogery in tho lirt:t chaptoi's of GenoHis, I, whilst liviuj,' in Jacksouville, (J 11.,) fur the nrst time wrote them out in full, as a preparation for doinj? so ; and sub- sequently nnido an effort to get them published by Lippincott, of Philadelphia; but without success: afterwards I made the same attempt with the Harpers of New York ; but was equally unsuccessful. I then tried tha Appletous and Scribner firms; but could effect no satisfact.'ry arrangement. I' 21 8T AND 22nd meeting. 271 Book iverHe, laptors At time liniiott, Ido fue [jqually I lirms ; last meeting of the Micliigan Association that I mentioned, was hold inKalaninzooin 18(51. The next one, (the 2l8t,) was held in (Irand liapids in Octoher 1862. This was shortly after I had resumed my relations to the Detroit Society ; hut only one per- son was present from Detroit at this session. Rev- G. N. Smith, the resident Minister of Grand Rapids ; the Rev. Richard Hooper, of Grand ville ; and Rev. J. R. Hibhard, as a visitor, were also tliere ; and t'.velve others outside of Grand Rapids. At this time Rev Jahez Fox had removed to Peoria, 111., but sent a long and important communication to the Association, earnestly advising it to come into a more orderly and organic form; whilst the Reports from the Detroit Society strongly advised that the Constitution be so altered as to require its nu mbers to consist of those who had been baptized into the faith of the New Church ; — which was so done. The Twenty-second meeting of the Association was held in Detroit, in October, 1803. There were 39 persons present from 18 different places outside of Detroit; and 08 persons were present at the Holy Supper. The Report of the Secretary says, "This meeting of the Association was better attend- ed than any previous one for three or four years past; and was accompanied with hopeful signs of an improving future." The Address of the Rev. G. N. Smith, as also that of Mr. A. Drysdale, on "The Church, and what we can do for it;" contained each many excellent remarks, and were well worthy of adoption. The 23rd meeting was also held at Detroit, in II IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) A V m / &< t^ f/u fA 1.0 I.I 1.25 nil IIIII15 HIT ■? M 2.2 !- !i^ 12.0 .8 U IIIL6 I % y). & /a '/a el. ^l A f ''W o / Photographic Sciences Corporation €^ ,\ ^ 4 ^<fe V c> a> '^'^;%<' 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY 14S80 (716) 872-4503 L<P te' m. ip.. ■272 23rd, 24th and 25th meeting. : I iM \ i October, 1864. On this occasion there were pres- ent 25 persons from 13 places out of Detroit; and more than a hundred were present at the Social gathering. The Holy Supper was administered to 60 communicants ; and every one found it was good for him to be there. The 24th Annual meeting was held again in De- troit, in October, 1865. There were present on this occasion 39 persons from 19 places beyond Detroit ; and the Report of the Secretary says, " The Asso- ciation was more largely attended than it had ever been before, in Detroit;" and that "the meeting was pleasant and satisfactory to all present ; " and ** nearly 150 persons were present at the social gathering, at which all seemed to enjoy themselves very much." Thus it was made manifest that the making it a distinctly New Church organization, composed of those only who were baptized mem- bers of the New Church, instead of retarding its progress and increase, was constantly adding to it. But again a dark cloud intervened, and evil coun- sels prevailed, introducing discord. The Detroit Society were embarrassed by unfore- seen pecuniary liabilities, which they felt unable to meet, and pay for the services of a Pastor. I then offered to preach without any pay till the Society should be able to clear themselves of their indebtedness, but my ofifer was declined ; only five voting ; two for accepting it, and three against ! So I \vithdrew. The next year the Association met for the 25th time, in October, (1866) ; its session this year being at Grand Eapids, at which 21 per- III THE ASSOCIATION ENDED f 278 lill the their lly five lamst ! )n met lesBion U per- sons were present, out of the place of meetmg, from lime different localities. I was then living at Adrian; hut "the Detroit Society invited the Eev. AVillard G. Day, of East llockport, Ohio, to make them a Missionary visit, and administer the Sacrament at their regular quarterly meeting in July last." This was practically the winding up of the Michigan Association ; for although a meet- ing was called to assemble in Detroit in 1867, there was not a sufficient number in attendance, as has already been stated, to make it desirable to open the doors of the Temple ; so the few who came met in a private house, and adjourned sine die ! This was a sad and mournful termination of the earnest labors and struggles, which through so many years I, together with others, had sought to make known the ])octrines of faith and life of the New Church in this State and vicinity. All the causes which led to this result originated in the re- pudiation of one of the Sacraments of the Church • a removal of, or allowing to be removed, the guiird for safety and protection which the Lord had provid- ed for it ; and a substituting ; or permitting to be substituted, the faith of the old and consummated Church, for that of the New and true Church ; or taking the Gate away altogether ! How truly luis the lesson been verified which is contained in tlie prophetic words of the Apocalyi)se : " And if any man shall take away from the words of the 13ook of this prophecy ; God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life ; and out of the Holy City ; and from tlie things which are written in this Book." 8 II i % m III 274 PUBLISHED MY BOOK. So far as the visible existence of the New Church in Michigan is concerned, with the exception of a feeble tenure still retained in Detroit ; it is practically blotted out; and, under such influences, can never be restored. Whilst residing in Adrian, a few persons interested in the Doctrines of the New Church, conceived the Idea of forming a N. C. Library, for the purpo!R> of lending such Books to all who might desire to read them ; and in January, 1867, about twent}' persons subscribed, and paid $80.00 for this purpose : which amount was afterwards considerably increased ; and, with Books afterwards added ; about 120 volumes were purchased for this purpose. Tliis however includes a donation of a set of the Arcana Celestia by the Swedenborg Printing and Publishing Society of New York ; and some other donations. As many as 25 different persons availed themselves of the use of this Librar} in Adrian ; and about 90 volumes were lent out. During my residence in Adrian, having the leisure and means, I made arrangements for publishing the series of Lectures on the Creation of the Universe, and the Flood, which, as previously stated, I had already prepared in manuscript, luit could not get published. This made a volume of about 500 pages, entitled "The Two Great Books of Nature and Bevelation; or the Cosmos and the Logos" ; with a Lecture on the One IicUf/ion, and other additional matter. (See page, 270. Note.) I had a thousand copies of this work printed and bound in Detroit ; nearly all of which have since REMOVED TO RICHMOND. 275 rr the for ;ion of lion sly ^t, l)Ut line of ioks of id the u, and S^ote.) id and since been sold : the larger portion of them where I had delivered them orally. I also had stereotyped a Tract of 12 pages, (the type for which I set up my- self), on (iod and the Sjnrltiud World ; and what is known concerning them, many copies of which I printed and distributed. Soon after removing to Adrian, I finished the printing of a Liturgy and Hymns which I had com- menced in Detroit, (intended for the use of that Society), which had been prepared under their auspices, and ordered to be printed for their use. This I did at my own expense, and with a press and type bought expressly for that purpose, but which when completed, they neither aecepted or acknowledged. This Liturgy however was subse- quently adopted by the Toronto N. C. Society, and is still used bv them. On leaving Adrian for llichmond, (with the con- sent of the contributors to it), I removed this Library with me ; and whilst there, loaned 75 volumes to 25 different persons. Afterwards, on removing to Toronto, (Canada), as many as 160 vohnnes were lent to 58 persons, or families in that city. And not a single book has ever been lost ; or injured, otherwise than by such wear as was unavoidable. 1 remained about two years and a half in llich- mond, where I preached and Lectured regularly every Sabbath ; but, questioning my ability to successfully cultivate a mental soil com])osed mostly of Quakers, Spiritualists, Lutherans, Roman Catholics and the so-called Evangelists ; all of I 8 1 I, El 276 NEW CHUHCH IN CANADA. whom seemed to bo so well satisfied with their present convictions, as not to care to know about any other faith, I doubted the propriety of remain- ing there ; and having a very cordial invitation to accept the pastorate of the New Church Society at Toronto, Canada, I accei)ted it, and early in October, 1872, I commenced my work in that city. * ]3ut before continuing this record in relation to the New Church in Toronto, it may l)e v,ell to brieHy state something concerning its commencement in this region of the liritish dominions. The first known receivers of the Doctrines of the New Church in Canada, were ]\[r. John Harbin, his wife, and her sister, (Miss ^Vheeler), who in 1830 left Salisbury, England, for Montreal, Canada. Mr. H. then being 37 years 'of age. He had l)een a Local preacher among the Methodists in England; but on receiving the ])o(!trines of the New Church, had, in 1827, been baptized by the liev. T. Goyder, and soon after originated the New Church Society in Salisbury. These three first came to Montreal, * Whilst living,' in Kichraoiul, an firticle appeared in one of the city papers on a Hciinun 1 hud recently delivered, in which article it was stated tliat the Yicurious Atonement wan a '• Hoax."' This criticism produced a reply hy the Rev. Thos. Comstock, (Methodis ^linister), in which he defended the doctrine; and repudiated thetei-m by whicli it was dosif^nated. This led to a long scries of articles which appeared in the Richmond Ti-liujiniii; (14 in all), hetweeu August, 1870, and Januaiy, ISTl ; in which, whilst no defence was made of the teiiu " hoax ; " I endeavored to shew the utter untenableness of the doctrine of Vicarious Atonement ; whilst Mr. C. as con- fidently maintained it. MR. HARBIN S LABORS. 277 lie of liich ;iH a ^108. 1 the ated. the and if the enesH 8 con- biit remained there only during the winter ; and after visiting several other locaUties, settled them- selves in Chinguacouchy, — about 20 or 25 miles north from Toronto, — in Canada West, (now Ontario), where they resided some years, and where a Mr. Bagwell, (also an Englishman), had erected a very commodious Log Chapel, in which Mr. Harbin preached regularly ; and soon there were known to be a number of scattered receivers of the Doctrines in various places. An effort was also made to obtain the services of a regularly ordained New Church Minister, to make a permanent, or temporary abode with them, but without success. On the 9th of January, 1842, Mr. Christopher Enslin writjs from Berlin, (Waterloo Co., Ontario), and says : *' Besides myself there is only one receiver of our Doctrines, and three occasional readers,'' but he says, " in the rear of Toronto, (some 70 miles from this), there are several re- ceivers, having a regular preacher" ; meaning Mr. Harbin. And in 1844, Mr. x\dam Ruby said tliere was an increased number of members and receivers, and the work goes bravely on. In February, 1854, Mr. and Mrs. Harbin, sister and children, removed to Berlin ; and with the few others then living there, constituted the first organic Society of the New Church in the Dominion of Canada. Thirty-two years afterwards (in 1877), that Society reports 208 adult members ; and had the largest and best House of worship in that Town. In 1859 another small Society of the tii '; t I i i Si i-- ir 278 DEP.LIN, STRATHROY, ETC. New Church was instituted at Wollesly, a few miles distant from Berlin, which in 1877 contained 56 members, and had a House of Worship of their own. These two Societies consist mainly of native Germans, although they nearly all speak the English language. The following year (1860), a small Society was also instituted in Strathroy ; composed mostly of English and Canadians. The birth of this Society was probably hastened by a rude and vehement assault which had been made ujDon a few professed receivers of the Doctrines living in the village : the most conspicuous of whom was the Eev. IJich. Saul, a Minister of the Primitive Methodist Church who had distinctly and boldly declared tho change in his religious convictions ; (to those of the New Church). This seems to liave excited a united and intense feeling of opposition ; and a determination if possible, to stamp it out, and extinguish it. In the Clinst'uui Guardian of August 24, 1859; published in Toronto; and in other religious periodicals, the following anathema was published ; headed " Swedenborgian- ism in Strathroy." " The Ministers, and certain laymen of the differ- ent Denominations in Strathroy and vicinity, have unanimously adopted the following Resolutions, for the purpose of counteracting the strenuous efforts made b}' the advocates of Swedenborgianism in this place, to circulate their literature, and dis- seminate their heretical views ; especially among the young and more credulous of other denomina- tions. Resolved, 1st. That we, the Ministers and PIERCE OPPOSITION. 279 Laymen of the diflferent sections of the Church of Christ in this vicinity, deeply deplore the introduc- tion of the Doctrines of Baron Swedenborg into our Country, and among our people, thereby un- settling the minds of the weak ; and furthermore, that we give it as our matured and deliberate opinion that such doctrines are infidel and heretical in their character ; and so dangerous in their tendency, as to render it extremely unsafe for the young especially to meddle with them. Resolvedy 2nd. That whereas Swedenborgianisni has doubtless received its chief sanction from the fact, that the leader of that party ' n this place, has represented John Wesley as being favorable to it ; and the doctrines ot Wesley as differing only slightly from that of Swedenborg ; we deem it our duty to state that Mr. Wesley unhesitatingly declares the doc- trines of Swedenborg to be " contrary to Scripture, to reason, and to itself ;" and the whole to be the work of a disordered imagination; and that **if Swedenborg was inspired, he was inspired from the bottomless pit." Mr. Wesley further declares that the waking dreams of Swedenborg, are so remote from Scripture and common sense, that we might as easily swallow the stories of " Tom Thumb", or "Jack the Giant Killer ": and the cele- brated Richard Watson declares the whole system to be, "inadmissible of any rational defence." Resolved, 8rd. That we believe Swedenborg's idea of Heaven and Hell so absurd, low, and grovelling, and his absurdities so numerous as to render his whole system fearfully demoralizing in its tendency; I 280 RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED and should therefore receive no countenance from any of our people. Resolved, 4th. That whereas the policy of Swedenborgianism is so perfectly Jesuitical, we, as Ministers and Laymen of the different Churches, enter our solemn protest against any person or persons holding Swedenborjian views ; or favoring directly, or indirectly that abominable system, being members of our Churches, or Teachers in our Sabbath Schools ; and any such being identified shall immediately ha dismembered, un- less amendment be solemnly promised ; and further- more, we are of theopinion that professing Christians of any of the orthodox Churches shew very great disrespect to the Bible ; and are in danger of suffering spiritual injury themselves ; and are set- ting an example that may prove ruinous to others by countenancing with their presence any Sweden- borgian meeting. Itcsolvcd, 5th. That we, as Christian Ministers, feel it oui* duty to preach at all our appointments, the pure doctrines of the Bible against the grievous errors of Swedenborg ; and earnestly invite the co-operation of all those who take the Bible for their guide,in discountenancing that fearful system. Resolved, 6th. That we join heartily and pra.yerfully in inviting all such as have been separated from other communities, through delusion by the Swedenborgian system, to recant their views, and to return to the bosom of their respective Churches, from which they weru excluded. Resolved, 7ih. That in order to preserve our respective Churches from any errors in doctrine, the officers and teachers in our Sabbath Schools AND PUBLISHED. 281 IS be subjected to a rigid examination as to their doc- trinal views, similar to the examination to which the other public instructors amongst us are sub- jected ; the time of such examination to be optional with their Minister in charge, and two of the oldest members of Committee. Resolved, 8th. That as the advocates of Swedenborgianism in this place strenuously exert themselves to disseminate their Books and Tracts among our people, thereby poisoning the minds especially of the young and more credulous, we urgently recommend that our people positively refuse to admit any of their litera- ture into their families. Resolved, 9th. That the editors of the Strathrov Times, the Christian Guardian, the Kclto, the Canada Christian Advocate, the Mornintf Star, the Kvan(jdical Witness, tlic Christian Messcnffer ; and all other editors favorable to our orthodox Christianity, be requested to pub- lish the foregoing liesolutions in their respective Journals, accompanied with a brief synopsis of the leading Doctrines rejected by the Swedenborgians, together with some of their absurdities. (Signed.) Eev. N. Brown, Wesleyan Methodist, "W. Chapman, do do B. M. Cr.AiiKE, Episcopal do Geo. Sharp, Free-will Baptist, Jas. Baskervili.e, New Connection Methodist,. T. E. Owen, Baptist. R. Cowan, M.D. Officiating Episcopalian. Robert Pegley, J. P. Methodist, C. Nappen. Methodist L. P. 282 PREJUDICE AND INTOLERANCE (( (( (I Rev. James Cooper, Methodist. '* Richard Kerr. Do. R. S. " A. N. Johnson. Edit. Strathroy Times. D. C. McIntyre, M.l). Baptist. Edward Dodge. Do. Joseph Little. Methodist." These Resolutions will remind the reader very much of the days of the Spanish Inquisition ; at least one could hardly think that the professors of such a religion belonged to an enlightened age ; or that they regarded those whom they addressed as being any more intelligent than themselves. Such intolerance and despotism however could have no influence on the minds of those who might be pre- 2)ared to receive the Heavenly Doctrines of the New Jerusalem. But it may seem surpri/ing to the thoughtful mind that such an ebullition as the above, should have been produced by the visit of two laymen from Berlin ; each of them delivering a Lecture on the Doctrines of the New Church, and then returning. What power there must have been in the few truths ■which they thus uttered to awaken such a storm of feeling; and such a combination of all their obtain- able forces to put them down, and endeavor to stamp them out ! And what could those few friends of the New Church do in such a case ? Ostracised, ■excommunicated, denounced and vilified ; and de- nied the privilege of even replying. It was well they could not also add the Stake, the faggot, and the Auto da fe. Replies were sent to some of these papers ; but, as might have have been expected, ^ OUADUALLY OVERCOME. 288 vrere refused insertion ; whilst another long and virulent assault was made on the New Church in the columns of the so-called ChriHtian (hKxrdian hy Elder Tucker. What reraarkahle courage and bravery they manifested in this crusade against a windmill, or less than a windmill; only a " wakinrf dream,'" told by two travellers ! And because these moral and religious forces were insufficient to sub- due them ; they subsequently resorted to these final and most convincing arguments of brick-bats and rotten eggs ! Thus was the New Church inaugu- rated into Strathroy. Of course for a time it was repudiated; but who does not know that "Truth crushed to earth shall rise again" ? It did so tlien. About live years from the time this onslaught was made, i.e., in November, 18(54, by invitation I made my first visit to Strathroy, and delivered three Lec- tures there, in the Town Hall. These Lectures were well attended, and seemed to make a favorable impression ; the number of receivers had consider- ably increased, and at that time I baptized three adults and one child into the faith of the New Church, and administered the Holy Supi)er to twelve persons, all members of the New Church. A number of our Books were also disposed of. Since the Strathroy Society has been instituted it has been gradually increasing, and now they have a neat little Church building of their own ; and there is no hostile feeling toward them from any quarter. The Toronto Society had its trials and persecutions also to pass through, although not of so severe a character as were those at Strathroy. In the sum- !■ 284 A SOCIETY FORMED. mer of 1863 eight persons, receivers of the Doc- trines of the New Church, met together at a private house to take action in regard to the propriety of hiring a suitable Room, or Hall, in which to hold meetings for public worship. Mr. John Parker, a receiver of the Doctrines, from London, England* was present, and being regarded as a suitable per- son, was invited to act as tboir Leader. They con- cluded to rent a Room belonging to the Mechanics* Institute, and hold religious services every Sabbath morning. At their first meeting eleven were pre- sent, which number soon increased to from 16 to 18 : and when they advertized their meetings there were sometimes from 25 to 35 in attendance. In due time a general meeting was called for the purpose of instituting and organizing a Society ; when 25 persons were received into membership — this was in April, 1864 ; and in the following February, four more were added ; in addition to which a number of others were becoming much interested in the doctrines of the church. During this time they had received but one Ministerial visit ; this was from the Rev. Edwin Gould, of Montreal, who administered the Holy Supper to 16 persons ; and baptized two children. Their room could scarcely contain the number of those who then attended. The Lecture delivered by Mr. G. was on the Resurrection. Many Books and Tracts were also sold and given away. In 1867, Rev. J. A. Williams, a Wesleyan Methodist Minister of Toronto, issued a Tract entitled " IVhtj I am not a Sicedenborgian ; " in a letter to a friend, at the ' OPPOSITION IN TORONTO. •285 11 request of the " Association of Wesleyan Ministers, in the city of Toronto." This Tract manifests a very superficial and imperfect knowledge of the subjects it attempts to discuss : and a pre-deter- mined disposition to reject whatever was not in accordance with his stereotyped convictions ; and is written in such a rtip[)ant and self-conceited style, as to make it to be really undeaerving of attention. But, as it gave an opportunity of re- futing some of the many widely circulated misrepresentations respecting the character and claims of the New Church ; a somewhat full and elaborate reply was prepared by Mr. Parker, (the leader of the New Church Society) ; and the two Tracts were bound together, (and sold and given away), under the title of" (-nod and EcilS' Two years later, in the " Home and Foreign record of the Canada Presbyterian Church," for November, 18()1>, another attack was made upon the ])octrines of the New Church. To this, there was published in Tract form, a response, bearing these words on its title page : " Prcshiitcrinmsm iind Siccdenborfj'iuniani ; being a defence and reply to a piece upon, and against, Swedenborgianism." kc, "By a member (not a Minister) of the New Jerusalem Church Society, of Toronto, Canada." This was a trenchant and masterly rebuke, and refutation of the misconcei)tions and i)t>rvor.sions ■of this assailant, as well as a turning of the tables upon him. To neither of these replies was there any response. After this, so far as outward and visible opposition was concerned, the New ChiUTh 7 286 ASSOCIATION ORGANIZED. I :.i \ !l m in Canada had a season of rest. Eev. F. "W. Tuerk, (formerly a Lutheran Minister) was ordained as Pastor of the Berhn Society in 1857 ; and con- secrated as an Ordaining i\[inister in 1864. Mr. Edwin Gould was ordained as Pastor of the Montreal Society in 1862, and Mr. J. Parker, of the Toronto Society in 1868. The Montreal Society is, and always has heen, quite small; and has not had so severe an ordeal to pass through as have those in a Protestant com- munity ; the Eoman Catholic Church apparently not regarding the New Church as sufficiently worthy of their notice to give it any trouble. A small society was formed at Port Elgin as early as 1859, with Mr. J. J. Lehnen as their Leader ; but apparently without much active life ; and owing to its mem- bers migrating to other places, it gradually passed away. Eeceivers of the Heavenly Doctrines, however, soon began to multiply in numerous other places, mostly in the Province of Ontario ; so that in 1862 it was deemed advisable for these collected, and scattered members to gather together in one body, and form an organization under the name of an AsHocidtioii. At the Ih'st meeting, held in Berlin, 41 persons were present, from 20 different places ; and 37 by proxy, from six additional places. This Association was an entirely independent body, and was organ- ized after the pattern of the English Conference, to, and from which, it sent and received yearly addresses. But at the Tenth meeting of the Asso- ii! VISIT STRATHROY AND TORONTO. 287 ly 0- ciation, held in Berlin in 1871, it was Resolved to apply to the General Convention of the New Church in the United States to be received into its con- federacy of Associations, in common with them. This was accordingly done. My second visit was made to Strathroy in »Tan. 1867, when I delivered live Lectures ; preached twice ; Baptized two adults, and administered the Holy Supper to 15 Communicants. In September of the same year, I again visited Strathroy, when I delivered three Lectures — preached once ; baptized one adult, and administered the Holy Supper to 18 Communicants. On my next visit, in October, 1869, I preached twice, and Lectured six times : Baptized two adults ; and administered the Holy Supper. Again I visited Strathroy in May, 1872, and preached once ; Lectured four times ; l^aptized one adult, and one infant ; and administered the Holy Supper to 17 Communicants. I have already stated that I visited and Lectured at Chatham four times to good audiences ; persons sometimes com- ing from a distance of from 12 to 20 miles to attend them. All this was previous to my going to Canada to live ; or even thinking of going there. In Miiy, 1872, I received an invitation to make a Missionary visit to Toronto, which I accepted, preaching there twice ; and delivering a Coarse of eight Lectures on the Doctrines of the Church, to good and attentive audiences. The Toronto Society rt this time had a neat and convenient little Temple, which will seat about 200 persons, with a School room in the rear, and in a very II ,4 •288 llEMOVED TO TORONTO. •desirable location. This building was erected, and dedicated in 1870, after a long and labored effort. At first it stood upon a Lot having but 40 feet frontage (on Elm Street) ; but '20 feet more have since been purchased, which adds much to its pleasantness. The Society here has undergone many vicissitudes and changes ; but still continues its stated meetings for worship. Soon after my arrival in Toronto, to reside, in October 1872,* I commenced the delivery of my Course of Lectures •on the Creation of the Universe, cl'C. These did not draw out as large audiences as they had done in the States ; nor were they noticed by the Press. Indeed neither the mental or religious atmospheres appeared to be receptive of ideas so far in advance of the standard dogmas of the times ; still there were some that were made glad by them. There was also much to do in organizing the Society, which for some time had been without a Pastor, *Al).)ut this tiiiu! the Society in J)i'ti'oit, (Michigan), hud ■cciupletod their new Ilonse of Worship on the S. W. corner of Cass Avenuo and lli>,'h Street, a very ehfj;il)le and j)lea8aut location, o)i a liOt 7') feet hy 100, the cost of whicli (witliout the buildinf;) was ^1750.00. Attached to the main huildiuf,' are rooms for Sabbath School and other Church uses; the whole having quite an attractive aspect both within aud without. The records of their Society say, that " To day (November Jh-d, lH72),our new Temple was formally dedicated l)y the Rev. Jabez Fox, assisted by tlie Revs. A. (). Brickman, L. P. Mercer, and E. S. Ilotliam." The latter (E. S. Hotham), was not, uor ever has been an ordained Minister of the New Church, although ho oflliciated for this Society for a short time as thei^ Minister. NEWSPAPER PREJUDICES 289 had ■r of isaut the are [hole The :u-(l, abez Ircer, uot, irch, :hcir But eventually we all got into working order, and the prospects were by no means discouraging. I preached regularly every Sabbath morning, and delivered Lectures in the evenings, during the winter ; visiting also, and Lecturing at such of the surrounding towns and villages as facilities were afforded for. In February, 1873, I visited Strathroy again, preaching there once, and deliver- ing six Lectures ; also administering the Sacra- ment. And in the next month, (March), by special invitation, I went to Berlin, and delivered six Lectures on the leading Doctrines of the Church. The English speaking portion of the Community had requested this ; as Mr. Tuerk usually preached in German. These Lectures were well attended, and gave very general satisfaction. As an illustra- tion of the popular prejudice against the New Church in Toronto, the Globe, the leading paper in the Province, if not in the Dominion, refused to jmb- lisli as an advertisement, the notice of our Sabbath evening Lectures, it was only by a very strenuous effort ; and perhaps the fear of the consequences that refusal might produce, that this intolerance was overruled. The same thing occurred the following year in Montreal : — One of the papers there, pro- fessedly the most liberal, also refusing to publish the advertisement of a New Church Sermon ! In the following June, (1873), I preached one Sermon, and delivered one Lecture in the village of Wellesley, whilst the Canada Association was in session there. In January of the following year, again by invita- tion, I delivered a Course of seven Lectures in T I PF 290 REPLY TO PROF. HIRSCHFELDER. Berlin, and preached once ; end the following month, visited Stratford, and delivered three Lectures there, in the Town Hall. These Lectures attracted a good deal of attention ; a Baptist, and a Methodist Minister attended them, and at the close of each Lecture asked a multitude of questions ; and made remarks intended to prejudice the minds of the audience; although it was evident they felt dis- comforted, this continued till near 11 o'clock on one evening. But the impression made was not favorable to them. Three months afterwards I was invited to return to Stratford, which I did, and gave three more Lectures; but the Ministers did not present themselves again ; although indirect efforts were made to arouse a feeling of opposition to the New Church. If these visits could have been con- tinued for awhile, there was every reason to believe that an influential society might soon have been formed: but the time had not yet come. In July, (1874), I preached on one Sabbath in Montreal; and in October following delivered three week-day Lectures in Toronto in review of a Course of Lectures on the Creation, delivered by Prof. Hirsch- felder, in the University in that city, in March, 187B, and afterwards published. These Lectures appeared to be intended as an antidote to the views presented by me in my Lectures on the same sub- ject delivered the year previous. Prof. H. assum- ing in his Lectures, that the Creation which Geologists teach, was all swept away, and destroy- ed ; and [a waste and chaos ensued ; and that it was from this that our jDresent vegetable, animal ARTICLE IN THE " NATION." 291 and human creations were produced in six days as literally and historically recorded in Genesis. A reporter of the Mail, (one of the daily papers pub- lished in Toronto), noticed my Lectures in review of this theory very favorably ; which called forth a very lengthy article from Prof. Hirschfelder in de- fence of his views, and in contravention of mine. I would have rejilied to this througli the same channel, but the editor positively refused to permit me. Soon after this, (in Sept., 1874,) Prof. Tyndall's address at Belfast was published in many of the Papers, which led to many editorial comments : amcng them the Editor of the Xation, (a weekly literary paper of Toronto, under the control of Goldwin Smith) ; in which the Editor says, " Does he (Tyndall), really believe that if the deca3'ing civilization of ancient Ptome had continued ; and Christianity had never been, that Science would have benelitted by its continuation ?" And that he (Tyndall), seems to have forgotten that it was not one of the despised Christians, but the Caliph Omar, of the enlightened Arab race who counnitted to the flames the literary treasures of Alexandria. This la'oduced a somewhat caustic and hostile rei)ly from a correspondent over the signature of C. Rice, claiming that this outrageous and atrocious act was not done by order of the Caliph Omar ; but " by the Christian Bishop, Theophilus ; who also demolish- ed the Temple of Serapis ; reducing it to a heap of rubbish:'' and attributing every act of vandalism, intolerance and destruction to the intiuence of H i^ !l 292 REPLY TO A SCEPTIC. Christianity ; and of all i)ro^ress, refinement and civilization to an atheistic science ! This was not permitted to pass without an ahle and talented criticism by the Editor ; yet, as I thought, without reaching the real point of attack, which was Christi- anity itself ; therefore I wrote the following reply, which was readily inserted. THE INFLUENCE OP INFIDELITY AND CIIEISTI- ANITY COMPARED, To the Editor of The Nation. Sir, — I feel moved to say a few words, by your permission, in reply to some very bold and unmis- takable sentiments, presented by your correspon- dent from Perth, growing out of previous notices of Prof. Tyndall, which I think calculated to produce erroneous impressions. I will follow them in the order in which they are presented. The query as to whether science would have been Ijenefitted by the decaying civilization of Home, had Christianity not been introduced, is answered by the admission that it would not. But, if a decaying civilization would not benefit science, would science benefit a decaying civilization ? Or could it exist in such a soil? Or could it take root there and grow ? Evi- dently it could not ; for in other lands, where there had been an advanced civilization, and no Christi- anity, as in Egypt, Greece, Arabia, and even in liome before the Christian era, civilization had become Tfell nigh effete, and the people degraded and sen- sualized ; idolatry and superstition had cast their deep shadows over lands that had once been mag- nificent in beauty and in works of art; and the ABOUT ALEXANDRIAN LIBRARY. 293 lag- the science of Pythagoras had been superseded by that of Tycho Brahe, and Ptolemy. Science in itself has no creating life in it — nor even any self-sus- taining life — but was, and is, inert and dead. Why, therefore, attribute the decadence of the Roman Empire to the introduction of Christianity ? Besides it could not properly be called Christianity at this time: for what went by that name was only the heathen idolatry, with Christian names appended. For as Mosheim very truly says of the fifth and succeeding centuries — " it was difficult to tell whether Paganism was most Christianized, or Christianity most Paganized." But this is true, that wherever, and in the degree that the Scrip- tures have been freely circulated. Science has found a foothold ; has taken root, expanded and grown. If this is so, it disposes of the first part of your cor- respondent's objection. And in reply to the ques- tion raised concerning the Alexandrian Library, it may be said that perhaps it is not fair to take Gib- bon's statement unqualified ; that the Iconoclasts who destroyed the Temple of Seraphis under the in- stigation of a so-called Bishop of a Christian Church and by authority of a so-called Christian Emperor, did also destroy a vast number of books and manu- scripts there, need not be denied ; any more than that subsequently a greater number still was des- troyed by the Saracens ; nor was there much to choose between the Emperor Theodosius or his Bishop Theophilus, and the Caliph Omar. A true Christianity should not be held responsible for any such outrages. But the animus of your correspondent 294 TEST OF RELIGION, 1 I towards the Christian religion is very observable throughout, and it leads him to a false position in regard to it, and to false conclusions. Thus he says, ** There is no religious hypothesis in existence verifiable by experiment." That is, I suppose, it cannot be put in a crucible and melted, or proved and analyzed by chemical tests. Well, I suppose not. Still, I think there ts a way of testing and proving it ; and it furnishes itself the means for doing it. Thus, in one place we read, " With what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged ; and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again." And " ]3y their fruits ye shall know tlieni." This is the crpcrivientum criicis ; and it is a most perfect one. But lot us adopt the method suggested by your somewhat dogmatic cor- respondent, of changing a word in his lemma, and read it thus : — " There is no sciciitijic In'pothesis in existence veriliable l)y principle.'' Science is mere fact ; and sciences are but accumulations of facts ; there is no law of causes ,- no philosophy of principles ; it is simply a dead fact, and nothing more. It does not make people better ; it has no tendency to do so ; it has no vivifying power in it ; -or any moral or religious influence. A man may be a learned scientist and vet be a thief, an adulterer, or a murderer, without the least com- punction ; but not so with a man who is religious in the proper sense of that word. Then we are asked, "Are there any beliefs implanted in the universal consciousness of man, as a fact ?" I should be content to answer No ; any more than there ALSO OP SCIENCE. 296 of of llg no it; [nay an om- ious are the ould here are any scientific facts thus implanted in the universal man. The child, when horn, knows no more of science, than he does of religion. In fact he knows nothing ; hut is horn with a capacity for knowing, and with faculties for receiving hoth natural and spiritual knowledge ; hut they must first he communicated, or taught, and provision is made for hoth. Stuenco is no more innate than religion is ; therefore, again to paraphrase your correspondent's language, I must say : " The in- fant has no scientific beliefs, and if taught none, like a Hottentot, or a New Zealander, he would live and die like them, witliout any." Nor are either scientific facts, or religious principles or ideas self-ingenerated, but irroiled, — the first to his phijsical senses, — for man does not create the facts he sees ; and the other to his nientdl fucalties, for man never created the idea of a God, of a spiritual world, or of his having a human soul. The facts of science he receives, as they are revealed to him by the organs of sight, lio.iring, feeling,and the lower frontal organs oi the brain. The truths of religion he receives by corresponding mental faculties, and the higher frontal and coronal regions of the brain. And both these classes of mental faculties are capable of perversion — the one may run into the vagaries of the atomic theory, the eternity of matter, self-creation, or other absurdities ; whilst the other may' run riot in persecutions, witchcraft, or other forms of fanaticism. And so, to shew the superiority of science over a true re- ligious faith it is sagely argued, that *' the material 296 WHAT TRUTH TEACHES. universe exists to-day because it existed yesterday,'* and therefore there is good reason to believe that it existed always. So man exists upon the earth to-day, because he existed yesterday ; and hence there is good reason to believe that he existed al- ways. But did the earth exist ten thousand years ago in the same condition that it does to-day ! Was there not a time when neither man, animals, nor vegetables existed upon ii ? Was there not a time when neither the Alluvial, Tertiary, nor Secondary formations were in existence? Was there not a time when the primitive granite was in a state of fusion ? In a gaseous state ? Even when it was in- visible and imponderable ? And if so, did it always exist ? And if not, was it not created? And " if we have no reliable guide but the senses," of what use is that portion of the brain which rises above the perceptive organs of the j^liysical senses ? And if these are, or ought to be quiescent, it would indeed be folly to speculate about the "Infinite," when all our researches ought simply to be confined to the pleasures of animal recreations, and the delights of our sensuous appetites. Your correspondent from Perth does not do well to draw' his conclusions from falsified or perverted views of religion, any more than it would be just to judge of a true science from the opinions which prevailed in the middle ages, or even the later crudities of Tyndall and Darwin. Yours, &c., G. Field. , Toronto, 26th October, 1874. HOW SCEPTICS ARGUE. 297 Mr. Rice replies to this, by assuming that what was called Christianity, was such^ and that there was DO other; and that it was not true to say that science has only found a home and encouragement where the Sacred Scriptures have been freely circulated and cherished ; for he says, " Science took root, expanded and grew, centuries before the Scriptures had an existence, the oldest books having been written in the time of the Jewish Kings." And that " since the advent of Christianity the same thing has occurred where the Scriptures have never been known." And that "it is doubtful whether the Scriptures ever would have been circu- lated had not scientific scepticism and doubt, pre- pared the way for a more free enquiry into the dogmatic teaching of the Church." Then he calls what I say about science being but an accumula- tion of facts; and possessing no law of causen ,- oi* philosophy oi pr'uiciplcs, and as having no tendency to make people better ; or as possessing any vivifying, moral, or religious influence ; "jargon," and "unmitigated nonsense "! " One would think (he says), the writer had just made his escape from the Asylum." Then, after a further laudation of scientific infidelity, and its moral status as com- pared with that of the Christian world, (still assum- ing that Christianity so-called is the standard of a true religion) ; and repudiating any known belief either in a God, a spiritual world, or the human soul, he concludes by expressing his regret that he has occupied so much space " in trying to winnow a few grains of wheat from a car-load of chaff.' )» 1 1 ^98 TRUE AND FALSE SCIENCE. il , To this I sent the following response, which was duly inserted in the "Nation.'' THE KELATION OF RELIGION TO SCIENCE AND CIVILIZATION. To the Editor o/The Nation. Sir, — After so rude an onslaught as I have already experienced at the hands of your doughty correspond- ent of Perth, you may perhaps have thought that I should hardly dare enter the list again against so formidable an opponent ; one who reminds me of a man, who in a state of undue elation, once said, " I came down from Heaven, I am forty feet high, and I weigh a ton and a half.*' Nor, sir, do I really wish to do battle with such an Ajax, or Achilles, or attempt — " To break a lauce against Ithuriel's spear." I shall therefore omit all reference to that peculiar style of bravado and contempt which I trust may be found to be the exclusive province of those onl}^ .sdio repudiate with so much disdain the courtesies and amenities which characterize the Language and the tone of the Chri-itian gentleman ; and w^tli your permission notice a few of the points raised in regard to the relation which religion and science bear to each other. The first ])oiiit is : that science is in no way dependent u[)on leligion for its support, or propagation ; but flourishes independently of it ; or rather that religion serves to extinguish it ; although sometimes it prevails in spite of it. But surely it must be allowable to distinguish between a true and a false philosophy. A false religion will sustain and encourage a false philosophy, as it did that of TRUE AND FALSE RELIGION. 299 y ])e .vlio and [the your !:!;ard ir to lis in ;t, or It; or lough true Istain lat of Ptolemy ; but not a true philosophy, as that of Copernicus or Newton ; which a true religion would sustain and cherish. This will always be found to be true. But as the difference between a true and a false religion might not be agreed upon, I will substitute this alternative by saying the Bible, in- stead of a true religion, and put the position thus : Science flourishes wherever the Bible is allowed freel}- to circulate, as may be seen by n-fercnce to all Protestant countries ; but tbe Bible does not (nor is it permitted to), circulate freely, under the auspices of science. This was made manifest in France under the rule of the Academy of Sciences, the Encycloptedists, and at the French revohition. And when I say the Bible, I say it as a u-liole, and the influence as such, which it exercises, and the effects which it produces wherever it is freely read. Nor do I think that this positioncau be controverted. But, your correspondent sa^'s that " Literature, Arts, and Science flourished among the Saracens, when the Christians had no better mode of curing diseases " than by the relics of the dead, etc. Jkit this is not the true religion 1 mean, nor the result which would be produced by the free and uiu'c- stricted reading of the Scriptures in the vernacular tongue. And yet we are told tliat " Literature, Arts and Seiences " flourished at the same time among the Saracens. And this is the way they flourished : Genghis Khan, during his lifetime is reported to have put to death, or caused to be slain, more than fourteen million human beings ! AVas that an evidence of advanced civilization? And T 300 HEATHEN CIVILIZATION. Tamerlane, who succeeded him, was scarcely less brutal and savage. Could literature, arts, or science, make any progress whilst the earth was thus being depopulated? Then we have the ravages and the slaughter of Alaric, and of Attila (the scourge of God ;) and the widespread havoc and ruin effected by the Huns, the Goths, and the Vandals, who, with the Saracens, rather helped to lay the would in ruins, than to advance either science or civilization Then we are told that "at the advent of Christianity the civilization of the old Eoman Empire was at its zenith." Why then did it not continue to flourish ? Did the fact of a few simple and illiterate men and women, pro- cessing a new religion, put a stop to it '? An event regarded as one of so little importance as scarcely to be even noticed bv a heathen writer of the times, and which could in no way have affected the litera- ture of tlie age, before the fourth or lifth century ; and then, as in reality was the case, Christianity became a convert to Paganism rather than Pagan- ism to Christianity; it is very difficult to see what responsibility attaches to the Christian religion for the decadence of literature or civilization. If (Chris- tianity had not been captured by heathenism, and dragged down by it, the long dark night of ignor- ance and semi-barbarism would not have set in. But what is the evidence that " at the advent of Christianity the old Roman Empire was at its zenith?" Was it manifested in its tolerance, its justice, its clemency, or any ennobling virtue ? Read the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistles ; read the ADMIXTURE CF TRUTH AND ERROR. 301 letter of the 3'ounger Pliny to the Emperor Trajan, which is one of the authorities your correspondent cites, is forced to admit is genuine, (I mean the ex- reverend Uobert Taylor, author of the "Devil's Pul- pit," and the "Diegcsis;" though he calls in ques- tion the testimony of Tacitus;) and in what way did these uohlc ii'om^nts treat these poor simple-hearted, devout and loving men and women who worshij)ped Christ as God; they drove them from city to city • they cast them into prison ; they scourged their naked backs ; they cast them to the lions ; had them torn to pieces by dogs ; or smeared with pitch and set fire to, to illuminate Nero's gardens. Even this gentle Pliny, by his own account, put to the torture two women (deaconesses), to make them confess ; but he says, "I discovered nothing beyond an austere, an excessive superstition." And this was the civilization which is so vaunted, as so superior to the one which has been fostered under the influence of the circulation of the sacred Scrip- tures ! Let it not be retorted tliat as bad things have been done in the name of the Christian reli- gion ; such things have never been done where the Scriptures have been frtely circulated and read. Although, in such case, great wrongs have been in- flicted ; and those, because those Scriptures were read under the false ideas which had been inculcat- ed by the Pagan doctrines which had been incor- porated into the creeds of professing Christians. If those Scriptures were read in their spirit and their life, there would be no persecutions or bitterness ; but civilization, science and art woukl expand and r r ii ^ 302 CHANGE IN LANGUAGE. i ! flourish under their influence, as all nature revives undsr the warmth and hght of the sun. And al- though tJiis has not yet been proved, it has been proved that civiUzation, literature, science and art have, and do, flourish most wherever those Scrip- tures are read and loved. And although there is an antagonism at this day between the teachings of science and the alleged teachings of Divine lievo- lation, the antagonism is not really between Science and Scripture, but the falsified interpretations of Scripture. When the nature and character of the pre- historic languages are better understood, the true intent and meaning of the prophetical and his- torical style of the Scriptures wdll, in the same de- gree be better understood also; L e. that which is called Scripture history. And this we are already approaching; within the past century the researches that have been made in Egyptology, and in Archae- ology generally, especial!}^ in Hieroglyphics, is a step in that direction. And when we reach the purely symbolic language we shall see and under- stand the true meaning of those records which were originally written when all the earth was of one lan- guage ; and when it was disrupted, we shail, in trac- ing it through the long ages of its transition periods, be able better to imderstand the earlier history of the Hebrew and Israelitish people. We shall also learn that "the oldest books" were not " written m the time of the Jewish kings," but that there were other books of greater anticpiity, some of which are referred to in our existing Scriptures, but which have long since been lost. Among these are the MERE SCIENCE IS DEAD. 303 13 lan- trac- iods, of ll also ieii in were 111 are ,'lucli 3 the Book of Jashcr ; the Wars of Jehovah; and the Prophetic Eimnciaiions ; to say nothing of the Jehovah Documents ; the Elohim Documents ; the Generations of Adam," etc., etc. It would occupy too much of your space for nie to enter into the proof that Science of itself is dead ; but it is so ; it cannot even be said to be a Truth ,- but only a Fact ,- for a trut)i involves a imiicipJr, which has a living power within it ; but a mere fact has not. Philosopluj is not dead, for that includes an active principle, a reason, a cause ; but Science is only the conclusion arrived at ; and is stationary — immobile. And as to the "idea of a God, a spiritual world," or a "human soul," I must for the same reason, pass them by with the observation that whether they exist objectively or not, they cer- tainly do subjectively ; and I mean to say that even so, man never could or would have created the i(]ea of them. And as to Creation, I do not believe that the world was created out of nothing any more than I do that it eternally existed ; nor do I jire- sent my remarks as a defender of " orthodoxy" so called. With these remarks I leave your redoubtable and heroic Philistine, who " To his owu prowess all the glory gave ;" Only regretting that he should have taken u}) so much time, and wasted so much powder, in shooting (( snipe," "when bull'alo were within range." G. Field. Toronto, Nov. IG, 1874. 304 VISIT TO STREETSVILLE. Mr. Rice replied again, but in so venemous, •contemptuous and abusive a stylo tbat the editor refused to insert it. Then he wrote again in a more moderate and subdued manner ; but all the time taking shelter behind the assumption that a perverted and falsified system of Christianity was the true religion ; and by indulging in sarcastic and acrimonious retorts and recriminations, when he was unable to answer a question argumentatively; or to refute its point by reason or by proof. Still he did not talk so proudly as at first. This subject attracted the attention of some of the most intelligent and literary minds in Canada ; one of whom, in a communication to the editor, after alluding to the " abusive letter " of Mr. liice, gives him a problem to solve on the subject of Evolution, which would have puzzled him to answer. This was almost the only time or opportunity I ever had to get a hearing in a To- ronto paper. About the middle of December, 1874, arrangements were made for me to go to the village of Streetsville, and deliver three Lectures on the Doctrines of the New Church, in the Town Ilall ; which I did ; my subjects were, the True idea of God ; human ledemption, and the resurrection. The doctrines were entirely new to the people ; and there was nothing particularly inviting in the out- look ; and not much of an audience was expected; but the Hall was comfortably filled at the first Lecture ; with more at the second ; and was crowded at the third ; and the people seemed to be quite interested : the Ministers not having had time LITURGY AND HYMNS. 805 Lie of ada; Utor, nice, ^-ct of n to ae or To- 1874, illage l)n tlie Hall; dea of ction. 3; and e out- ected ; e first d was d to be ,d time to interpose their dissent. The following month (January, 1875,) I was sent for to Berlin, to preach the funeral Sermon of Mrs. Harbin, widow of Mr. J. Harbin, whose family, as already noticed, were the harbingers of the New Church in Canada, and in June following, whilsi; attending the annual meeting of the Canada Association in the same Town, I lectured once and preached once. At the time of my going to Toronto, the Society were not suited with the Liturgy they were using, nor any other that they had seen. I had shortly before finished printing the one that the Detroit Society had ordered for their own use, including also a collection of Hymns ; but which, when sent to them theyneither accepted nor acknowledged. I presented a copy of one of these to the Toronto Society for their acceptance ; which, on examination, they were pleased with, and at once adopted. But as there were not a sufficient number of Hymns, and no Chants, a Committee was elected by the Society to review an enlarged and improved collection which I had prepared as a substitute for those tlien used. After a long, and careful examination, and, to some extent, revision of these Hymns, they were reported to the Society as well worthy of their adoption. The Society at once made arrangements to have them printed and bound for their use, in a neat and ornate style ; and in November, 1875, they took the place of the former Hymns in their public worship; and were received with much satisfaction. This was accomplished whilst as yet it was re- garded as very doubtful whether either the Con- u III; li ! 806 MOUNT FOREST. vention, or the Ministers' Conference, would agree upon their proposed rehgious services. Early in the following year, having heard that some Lectures on the Doctrines of the New Church would be favorably received at Mount Forest, I wrote to ob- tain further information : but could not learn that there was a single person there who either knew, or cared to know, anything about the New Church in that neighborhood ; but being advised that it would be well to make the effort to introduce them, I sent an advertisement to the editor of one of the papers published there, that I would deliver three Lectures at the Town Hall, (having previously engaged it for that purpose), on the evenings of February 15, 16 and 17th, 1876. I accordingly arrived there in due season, and at the appointed hour wended my way to the place of meeting, with no apparent prospect of a single hearer ; but there was a very fair attend- ance ; and I presented my, to them, new views, to an attentive, if not receptive audience. At its con- clusion two or three persons desired to present questions to me concerning statements x'/hich I had made, that were intended to be refutations of them. I distinctly stated that I did not come there to argue, or discuss the doctrines with them ; but simply to present them ; and they would accept, or reject them, according to the evidence I gave of their truthfulness. But this did not suit them at all ; they were resolved that I must answer their questions, and so I did as well as time would per- mit. The second Lecture was better attended than the first one : there were three Ministers attending PLEASED, YET NOT PLEASED. 307 them, (Church of England, Presbyterian, and Methodist). At the close of the second Lecture, the Presbyterian Minister voluntarily came forward and spoke to the audience in the most laudatory manner of the Lecture, saying that it was all true ; and more too. At the close of the third Lecture, when the interest seemed to be increasing, the subject being on the Eesurrection, the same Minister came forward and spoke of the views presented in the highest terms of approval ; and siiid that there was a strong de- sire on the part of many that I would come again and deliver some more Lectures. What was my surprise however to learn, after I had returned home, that this same Minister had given notice to his congregation that he would de- liver two Lectures in review of mine, which ho said were an insult to the intelligence of the peo- ple of Mount Forest; for that, according to them, "God Himself was dethroned"; and that he had "no patience with such people" ! and using much hard and censorious language : his object being to prove that there were three separate and distinct persons in the one God. • This Sermon was published in full in the Mount Forest Kxaminer ; in which paper an abstract of my own Lectures had appeared. To this I sent the following reply, which duly appeared the next week: MR. FIELD'S REPLY TO REV. J. ERASER. To the Editor of The Examiner. Dear Sir — I notice in your issue of the 25th inst., that the Eev. J. Eraser has delivered a very i 808 IDEA OF OOD. critical sermon in review of the first of my three Lectures recently delivered in Mount Forest. You will not, I trust, therefore, think it unreasonable if I ask your permission to reply to some of the more salient points of objection now made by Mr. Fraser to that lecture. Mr. Fraser, it seems, fully concurs with me in the acknowledgment of the Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ ; that he is eternal, omnipotent, omniscient, creator, and, "over all, God blessed forever." And that as such He is a distinct per- sonality ; but, says Mr. Fraser, — one of the three distinctive persons — and, not to leave us in any doubt about what he means by the word person: he defines it as "a being who is independent in action — has free will in choice ; has a reasoning, self-determined power within him, and is responsible for his actions and volitions." And there axe three such persona to constitute one God ; that the second person is a distinct individual — **a living, moving independent agent — apart from God the Father," (the first person) : as much so as two men are dis- tinct and separate from each other. Now, if I should ask which of these is God? Would the answer be, neither of them alone is God ; but that each is a third part of God ? Surely not. Then is each one alone, by Himself, God ? If so, is He the only God? — if not, then there must be more than one God ! If each is an independent Divine Person and each is God — how is it possible that there is but one God ? If God is infinite, is infinity divisible into three infinities ? If not, can each be infinite ? Or is one Divine nature common to the three ? If so, Ili INCONSISTENCIES. 309 is it not like three men with one mid to the three bodies ? But have they one nature in common ? Is not the Father's nature full of vindictive justice, demanding a victim to satisfy His justice ? Has the second or third person any such stern or in- dignant feelings to be satisfied ? Is not the Son represented as suppliant and interceding? Has the Father any such characteristics '? What feel- ings are in common between them, or, in what re- spect do such opposite qualities constitute equality, or oneness, or present the idea of a God in whom there is no variableness, nor shadow of turning ? How forcible and to the point is the language of a clergyman of New England, who says, " To say that God exists in three persons, is to say there are three self-conscious Beings ; and the concep- tion is produced instantly in the mind, of three Gods. You may protest that you are not using language in its common acceptation ; but what does the protest avail, if you go right on and as- sign such offices and functions as inevitably beget the notion of three self-conscious actors in the believer's mind ? Is it the words on his lips, or is it the inmost thoughts of your heart that God regards in worship ? We may. say : ' One God' with the mouth all day, and all night ; and yet, if the attitude of the soul within is toward three Persons, each with an independent, self-conscious- ness, and each having Divine attributes, then the motions of the mouth are as empty sounds, while the act of the soul is an unblest idolatry." The highest and truest idea we can have of God, is, that 810 THREE ESSENTIALS. I W, He is absolutely and indivisiblyONE. One in Essence, and One in Person. No such words as three per- sons, or their equivalents, ever occur in the Scrip- tures ; and it is only by a sensuous thought that we attribute personality to the names of the three es- sentials which constitute the One person of the Lord. The Jews had in their Scriptures throe distinc- tive names of their One God — Jehovah, Elohim, and lliKich, answerinf^ to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, of the New Testament ; l)ut the thought never occurred to them tliat there were three per- sons in their Monotheistic worship, because the words do not convey any such meaning. Tiie Hebrew word, Ruach, answers to the Greek word Pneuinn : its literal meaning is Breath ; l)ut as breath is the sign indicative of Life, it therefore stands for Life ; and as such is rendered Spirit, from the answering Latin word Spirit us. Thus^ the Spirit of God is the same as the Life of God, or the Breath of God ; i. c, His proceeding, out- going life, as in Gen. i., 2 : "The Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters": /'. c, the Breath (liuach) of God, emanated, or flowed forth from Him. But that Breath (or Spirit) was not 2b jicrson I So the Greek word Pnciuna, translated Spirit, or Ghost, is also Breath ; as when Jesus breathed on his disciples, and said : lleceive ye the Holy Breath, Spirit, or Life. He did not breathe a Person on His Disciples ! Nor, when He said He would baptize them with the Holy Spirit, (Breath, or Life), did He mean that He would ir NOT THREE PERSONS. 811 baptize them with another Divine Person. It is true that the Spirit, and the Holy Spirit are often pei'sonijied, but tliat does not constitute them real, or actual persons. Personification is the constant language of Scripture. Death is personified, Sin, Wisdom, Undorstaiiding, etc., etc, are personified, or are addressed as persons ; but tliey are not persons. So also the soul is often addressed as anotli(>r person : as — " my soul, come not thou into their secret." " my soul, tliou hast trodden down strength." " Wiiy art tliou dis([iiiotod, my soul?" etc. Nor does the word Father, in the language of Scripture, any more nece?- warily con- vey the idea of personality, than the wi ' Spirit does. The Father is the all-begetting > ; the inmost cause of action. When our life is like the Divine life, because received from it, and appro- priated, then God is our Father, and ire are His children ; but not in a personal sense. Jhit when we do the works of the Devil — thcai the Devil is our father ; but this is not personal either. And when we say, " the wish is father to the thought,'' we do not mean that the " wish" is a person; but it is the inmost moving spring of action, and the generator of the thought. And when the feelings and the thoughts are in unison, they act as a one. And this is fully and beautifully explained by the words of the Lord in answer to Philip, who wanted to see the Father : " He that hath seen Me, hath seen the Father ; I and the Father are One. The Father is in Me. The Father that is within Me doeth the works," etc. But the rebuke of the Lord 812 MEANING OF HOLY SPIUIT, is as applicable now as it was then : ** Ye neither know Me, nor My Father." But the Son, or the Divine Humanity, brings forth the Father to view, as the body does the soul, for the Father is in the Son, as the soul is in the body. And the Father sending the Son, is but the innermost Divine life descending into the outermost manifes- tation, which was when the Word was made Flesh, and dwelt amongst us ; it was not one God sending another God, or one Divine person sending another one ; but it was by Jehovah Himself assuming Humanity, by birth in our world. All the Prophets announce this; thev all declare that Jehovah Him- self would come to be our Saviour and Redeemer. There is no mention in the Old Testament of any then existing Son of God ; or any Holy Spirit ; but the Humanity He assumed in the world, it is said, " shall be called the Son of God." Nor do thev speak of any then existing Holy Spirit, i^or Ghost); but of the Sj>irit of God, and the Breath of God ; for the "Holy Spirit was not till Jesus was glori- fied", or till He had made His Humanity Divine. The Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is the profanation and rejection of the Divine life, (which is the life of the Divine Son or wisdom), when done wantonly and wilfully. It is indeed singular '^aid even astonishing, when the Scriptures are so plain, explicit and emphatic in teaching us, that Jehovah our God is One Jehovah ; and that " thou shalt know no God besides Me": that " I am Jehovah, and there is none else." " There is no God else beside Me, a just God and a Saviour; there is none '\ "WHY NOT UNDERSTOOD. 313: beside Me" — that men should have multiplied other Gods, or have divided the One God into three ;^ when yet the word Jehovah itself is not only abso- lutely singular, but does not even admit of a plural form. And this One Jehovah is constantly declared as Himself coming to be our Saviour and Redeemer. And when He came into the world and took upon Him His new name, Jesus, (or Saviour), then was fulfilled the prophetic enunciation : "And it shall be said in that day, Lo, this is our God ; we have waited for Him, and He will save us ; this is Jehovah, we have waited for Him, we will be glad and rejoice in His salvation." " We have found Him," said Philip, " of whom Moses in the Law and the Prophets did write." And the Lord Him- self, "beginning at Closes, and all the prophets, expounded unto them, in all the Scriptures, the things concerning Himself.'' And they did not understand it then, any more than men understand it now, for the Lord said to them. " O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken." Had I time, or did I think you could spare the space, I would show how utterly unfounded is the comparison of the Doctrines of the New Church up- on the assumption of Humanity in our world by Jehovah, to the teachings of Sabellius, or the Patri- passionists — it has already been refuted more than a score of times ; and because men will not learn before they accuse and condemn, may yet have to be done as often again. Let this suffice for the present. Yours, very truly, G. Field. -' I ^ i I S14 MR. YEWENS APPEARS To the above, the Editor, who is a member of Mr. Frazer's Church, cautiously added the following •wise suggestion : [Ed. Note. — Though not endorsing the above views, we feel bound in all fairness to Mr. Field to give him full space in our columns for their ex- pression. All we would desire to say to our readers is this — honestly and candidly compare the respec- tive systems presented in our issue of this and last week, by the common standard claimed by both disputants. Apart from all mere human reason and assertion, wliich of the two has more fully ex- hibited the truth as it is revealed in the Holy Scriptures. — Ed. Ex.] To the above Mr. Frazor made no reply ; but shortly afterwards the Rev. II. L. Yewens, of the Church of England, who attended my Lectures, felt an irresistible desire to silence any heresy or schism which might creej) into his Church ; he therefore sent the following communication to the Examiner, which appeared in due season. SWEDENBORGIAN THEOLOGY. To the Editor of the Ex.vminkr. Dear Sir. — The llev. Mr. Field, in his lecture in this place some time ago, on the Idea of God, spent a largo part of his time in endeavoring to make it appear that the Doctrine of tlie Holy Trinity, as received in the Church of Christ, is un- reasonjible. I will not now dwell upon what struck me as the needlessly mischievous tendency of that part of his lecture, nor upon other points in it open IN BEHALF OF HIS CREED. 815 to criticism ; but there is one point which is re- peated in his recent letter, in your columns, upon which I would like to make some remarks. It is expressed in the letter thus: "The Jews had, in their Scriptures, three distinctive names of their One God — Jehovah, Elohim, and liuach, answering to Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in the New Testament." This, if true, is a most im- portant fact. Let us test it by two distinct lines of enquiry. It is certainly reasonable to say, that, if the above assertion be true, we may, in all cases, where ''Elohim" and " JiinovAH" occur in the Old Testa- ment, put in the place of " God " and " Loud," by which they are represented in our English Bible, the new Testament s^^nonyms (on this theory) of "Father" and "Son." Let us see, by a few instances, how the theory works. First, I will take a few examples from the lirst three chapters of Genesis : Chapter i., 1 — 2. " In the beginning the Father created the heaven and the earth. * * * And the Spirit of the Father moved upon the face of the waters," CuAPTKii ii., *2. "And on the seventh day the Father ended His work which He had made." 4. " These are the generations of the heavens, and of the earth, when they were created, in the day that the ,SV*// Father made the earth and the heavens." 10 — 17. "And \\i<i Son I-'atlier coiunuinded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat ; but of the tree," etc. .1 ► ( < 816 HE PERVERTS THE TEXT. Chapter iii., 1. " Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the Son Father had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath the Father said, ye shall not eat," etc. Now let us make a few selections from later books of the Old Testament: Psalm ii., 7. "I will declare the decree ; the Soil hath said unto me. Thou art my Son ; This day have I begotten Thee." Psalm vii., 1. "0 Son, my Father, in Thee do I put my trust." Isaiah, xi., 1 — 2. " The Spirit of the Son Father is upon me : because the Son hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek, etc., etc. To proclaim the acceptable year of the Son, and the day of vengeance of our Father/' It appears to me, Mr. Editor, that these few specimens are quite sufficient to show that this theory, as to tlie Hebrew names of God, does not present the language and meaning of the Bible in any more reasonable, or intelligible light than does the common doctrine of the Holy Trinity. But now let us test this theory in another way. It is evident that in the Old Testament, the names ** Lord" {Jehovah) and " God" {Elohun) are used to a very large extent synonymously. Each of course has its distinct meaning in the original ; but those meanings do not correspond to "Father" and " Son." The former is used, we know, with a special reference to the covenant relationship assumed by the Almighty to Israel, — see Exodus iii. But, apart from this, they are used synonym- ^msmmmmmu TO SUPPORT HIS ARGUMENT. 317 ously, so that, in multitudes of cases, we might ex- change the one for the other, without spoiling the sense of the passage. Where "Lord" occurs alone, we might in most cases put " God" in its stead; and where *' God" occurs alone, we might put ** Lord" in place of it, without producing any con- tradiction of the original meaning ; we should only, in some cases, obscure the special reference to covenant relationship expressed by Jehovah. But very different would be the effect if we were to ex- change "Father" for "Son," and "Son" for *' Father" in the New Testament. We should make every such passage contradict its true mean - ing. We should produce utter confusion through- out the volume. For personal acts and works are attributed to each separately and distinct from the other. So that what is true of the Father is not true of the Son ; what is true of the Son is not true of the Father. By these two tests, then, Mr. Editor, I tliink it very i^lainly appears that the assertion, that the Hebrew names "Elohim" and "Jehovah" answered to the Christian or New Testament names "Father" and " Son," is utterly contradicted by the facts in the case. Very truly yours, Harry L. Yewens. Mt. Forest, 16th March, 18^0. To this I at once forwarded the following reply, which appeared in the next issue of the Examiner : MR. FIELD'S ANSWER TO REV. MR. YEWENS. To the Editor of The Examiner. Dear Sir — I begin to see that my work in Moimt ? I 318 A TRI-PERSONAL GOD, '■1 ! 1 1 '^^^^^H 1 i^l^^H \ ''^^^H ' [ t .{<iH^H '• i^^^H ! i Forest is not quite completed, but that statementa "which I made in my former communication are called in question by another defender of the Athanasian Creed, and are supposed to be refuted by the letter published in your issue of the 17th inst. May I ask of your courtesy permission to reply ? Your correspondent has thought proper to intro- duce for the first time the name of Swedenborg. I have no objection to his doing so, although I have not deemed it necessary to do it myself. Mr. Yewens objects to my shewing that "the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity, as received in the Church of Christ is unreasonable." As I like to be exact, as well as correct in my words, I would say that it was not the Doctrine of the Trinity that I present- ed as unreasonable, but that of the Tri-personalitif of (iod ; this I uflfirm is not only unreasonable, but unscriptural and idolatrous ; because the descrip- tions which are given of this conception of the Deity are, that there are not only three distinctive Divine Persons each by himself being God and Lord, and Almighty ; but that one sometimes sits at the right hand of another, either on the same Throne, or on another one ; and sometimes one stands before the other, and pleads and supplicates ; then again they separate, and one comes down to earth, whilst the others remain in heaven; but afterwards returns and takes his seat again *' at thtt right hand of God, the Father"; and that each of these Divine Persons is to be regarded as an object of worship ! How is it possible that this can AND OTHER FALLACIES. 81^ present to the mind the idea of One God? No intelligent mind can so conceive of it. Nor does the language of Scripture really convey such an idea. In the revelations made of the Lord in the Sacred Scriptures, His attributes are personified, as I have already shown ; l)ut that lends no count- enance to the idea that those attributes, or essentials are persons, nor can it justly be said that my exposition of this fallacy, and the presentation of the genuine truth, is in any sense " mischievous." Then, I presume, inadvertly, Mr. Y. has mis- conceived what I said about Jehovah, Klohim and Ruach : my point was not to show that they were the answering equivalents in the Old Testament to Father, Son and Holy Sjtirit in the New ; but to show that, although the Divine Being was revealed by three distinctive names in the Old Testament, the Jews never understood them as being the nami s of three Divine Persons ; and there is no more reason for believing that the names in the New Testament convey this idea than those in the Old do. It is not claimed that one name is j^reciscli/ equi- valent to the other, because the circumstances in the one case were different to those in the other, but, so far as the circumstances were the same, so far do the names bear a relative signification. The difference in -the circumstances is, that the one class of names designate the Lord before He came into the world, and the other, after. But it is somewhat remarkable that in this juxtaposition Mr. Yewens has in every case misplaced their order, and put Son as the equivalent of Jehovah, 820 NAMES OF GOD. instead of Father, and put Father as the synonjnn of God, instead of Son, and thus shewn their in- congruity ! Jehovah is the name of the inmost and unap- proachable essence of the Divine Being — the hid- den life — the moving spring and generative source •of all creation, of which the name Father is not a remote correspondence ; each being alike expres- sive of the Divine Love. Elohim (or God), is the form or manifestation of Jehovah, as the Divine Truth in which Jehovah is revealed ; as the Father is revealed, or brought forth to view, in the Son ; or as the solar heat is manifested in the light of the solar disc ; and the radiation of its heat and light, which is the effulgence of the solar glory, is typical of Ruach (pneuma) the proceeding life of spiritual heat and spiritual light, which is ever efflow'jg from Him who is the Sun of Eighteous- ness ; and is, in the language of Scripture, called the Spirit of God, or the Breath of God — the Para- clete, or Comforter. Creation was ejected from Jehovah, hy Elohim,- or from Divine Love, by (or by means of). Divine Truth or Wisdom. Kedemption and Salvation were in like manner effected from the Father (or Divine Love), by, or by means of, the Son (Divine Truth); and their blessings and benefits are con- veyed by the saving influence of the breathings forth of His pneuma hagion (Holy Spirit). The compressed form of expression in the Hebrew language, needs some expansion to adequately ex- press it in the English, which requires preposi- DENOTING QUALITY. 321 tions to be introduced where, in more primitive languages, they are understood, as in the name Jehovah-God, where, instead of saying Jehovah in God, the very combination of the words is intend- ed to imply it ; being equivalent to the Greek form of the Father in the Son ; or the English mode of the ioul in the body ; or the heat in the light. If the same ideas were expressed in Hebrew phrase- ology they would be Father-Son; soul-body; and heat-light ; but such terms would sound quaintly to us and be obscure, because they are not in accord with the genius of our language. Hoping this will prove satisfactory to Mr. Y., I cone hide ; if not, I will willingly try again. Respectfully yours, G. Field. Toronto, Ontario, March 20th, 1870. But Mr. Yowons was stratog:!tic: and when he found himself unsuccessful in one point of attack, he, like a skilful general, sought some other one that might seem to be more vulnerable; accord- ingly, in the next week's issue he renews his at- tack in another form, as will be seen by the fol- lowing : — SWEDENBORGIAN THEOLOGY. To the Editor of The Examiner. Dear Sir, — Mr. Field remarks that he did not mention Swedenborg ; but he does not object to ray doing so. I will also remark, that I did not <;all myself a defender of, or say anything about the Athanasian Creed ; yet I do not object to his bringing it in. That Creed expresses the Scrip- 822 rERVERHIONS OF TRUTH. ture Doctrine of the Trinity which has heen re- ceived in the whole hody of the Christian Church from the beginning in a scholastic, but very explicit manner. At the same time, in my letter I defended nothing, but simply showed that Mr. Field's asser- tion as to the relation of Jehovah, Elohim, and Ruach in the Old Testament to Father, Son, and Holy Ghost in the New was utterly untenable. I shewed this by two general considerations. One he does not attempt to teach. As to the other he says that I misunderstood his meaning. All I can say is that I answered what his language expressed. If he did not mean that, it was no fault of mine. Warning was given, long ago, in the writings of St. Paul that in the latter days there would be a wide-spread rebellion against the Truth of God as given to, and held forth by the Christian Church, and a multiplication of false teachings on Chris- tian topics. Among the fulfilments of these pro- phetic warnings is the rise of the comparatively in- significant sect that has received the opinions and fancies of Emanuel Baron Swedenborg as of co- ordinate authority with the inspired Scriptures. Baron Swedenborg was a very remarkable man. He attained to considerable eminence in the science of his day ; but at the same time he was an extra- vagant enthusiast on the subject of religion He supposed himself to have visited the heavens, and to have learned a great part, if not all, of their secrets. And he undertook to tell a great deal about the manner of life of the inhabitants, as corres- ponding minutely with that of earthly people. Ta tlK CONFIRMED AND PERPETUATED. 323 sucli high position do his followers elevate his fancies that they are thus mentioned in tne offices of BaptiRin used hy the sect. An exhortation re- quires the newly baptized to he made, or to become acquainted " with the Holy Word, and with the heavenly doctrines of the New Jerusalem, as re- vealed htf the Lord in the writings of Ilia Servant^ Emanuel Sn-edcnhonj/' The Italics are mine. Mr. Field presents anew the spectacle so often Been in the advocates of false doctrines that in con- troverting the ancient doctrine of the Church of Christ, he is forced to light against the very terms of God's Word written. His charge against tiie Church's doctrine is " that there are not only three distinctive (distinct) Divine Persons, each, hy himself, being God, and Lord, and Almighty; but that one sometimes sits at the right hand of another, * * and sometimes one stands be- fore the other, and pleads, and supplicates; then again tkey separate, and one comes down to earth, whilst the others remain in heaven ; * * and that each of these Divine Persons is to be regarded as an object of worship ! " Every one of these particulars is the subject of plain and unmistake- able statements of the Holy Scriptures which there- fore the Church receives as they stand. Yet Mr. .Field docs not hesitate to say: "Nor does the language of Scripture really convey such an idea." What blank astonishment must have sat on the countenances of many of your readers when they came to that sentence, Mr. Editor. " What does he mean ? " they doubtless asked Why those are I 824 SPIRITUAL LIGHT EXCLUDED, the very words of the Bible ! What kind of a Bible does he use ? Permit me to throw a little light upon these befogged intellects. The Swedenborgian has a most convenient Article in his Creed, by means of which he is able to turn the plainest statements of facts in the 'e into a mystical sense, that serves to deny its .ae meaning, and make it support Bomething altogether the opposite of what it was intended to convey. This precious Article is the 8rd in the Swedenborgian Confession of Faith, and reads thus, in the copy before me: " I believe that the Sucred Scripture, or Word of God, is the Very Divine Truth, cotiUdning a celestial and spiritual sense in all and every part, from whence it is divinely inspired, as well as a literal sense, wherein Divine Truth is in its fulness, sanctity and power. Thus it is ?commodated for the instruction of of angels men." It is easy to see how con- venient for tiib holder of heretical opinions such a fancy as this is. One instance of its perversion of Scripture Mr. Field gave faint intimation of, in the brief discussion that followed his first lecture here. John XX., 17. "Touch me not; fori am not yet •' ascended to my Father," having been referred to, he said, in a casual way, that he did not under- stand by that an actual going up of Jesus into, heaven, but a mystical meaning of rising morally, spiritually. Mr. Field says: " In the revelations made of the Lord in the sacred Scriptures, His attributes, are personified." This assertion I am under the It AND CALLED INTKLLKCTUAL PllIDK. 825 necessity of saying is altogether contrary to fact, as regards the New Testament, in the Old Testa- ment there are some personifications of attributes of God, as Wisdom in the Book of Proverbs, and 80 forth. But in the New Testament there is nothing of the kind. "Father " is not an attribute, but a Person. *' Son " is not an attribute, but a Per- son. If a man chooses to say — " Father" doesn't mean Father, but soni&thing else — " Son" doesn't mean Son, but something else. And if to support these assertions, he further says, ** The Bible has an interior meaning that only the initiated under- stand " — then he puts himself out of the reach of right reason and common sense into a field pecu- liarly his own, where it is inconvenient to argue with him, because you have nothing to hold him by. It must be observed, however, that the root of this Swedenborgian error, in regard to the Holy Trinity, lies in an intellectual pride that will not take the simple revelation of God, as Himself has given it, but will attempt to explain that which is above man's comprehension. '*How can these things be?" is an old question, at which pride is continually stumbling. But to the humble student it is a necessary thought that the manner of God's Being must be different from the manner of any other Being — that it must be incomprehensible by man. " Oh no," says the Swedenborgian, **I can tell you all about it. The Trinity is perfectly easy to explain, if you will only receive my dictum as to the meaning of the words used in the Bible ! " 826 VAIN NOTIONS llKBUKEl). Such vain notions, liowever, have their stern rebuke already provided in the very words of Scripture. " Canst thou by searcliing lind out God ? canst fhou iind out the Ahnif];hty u'lto per- fection? ]t is as liigh as heaven ; what canst ///om do? deeper than lie 11; wliat cause thou know? The measure 'here of is longer thanthe earth, and broader than the sea." Apologizing, Mr. Editor, for the length of this letter, in which, however, I thought it proper that I Bhoi.id give your readers some information possibly not within the reach of all. I am, yours faithfully, Harry L. Ye wens. Mount Forest, March 31st, 1870. Comparatively unimportant as were these stricturt'-s, when the more essential points were virtually con- ceded ; still as the obvious intention was to make it appear that our Doctrines were entirely depend- ent upon what was regarded as the merely specu- lative opinions, or fanciful inuiginations of Sweden- borg, in contradistinction from long and venerable ecclesiastical authority: I at once sent the follow- ing reply ; which duly appeared. REV. Mil. YEWENS CORRECTED. To the Editor of Tue Examiner. Dear Sir — 1 really liavo no desire to enter the polemical arena with ]\lr. Yewens, or any one else. I came to Mount Forest to present to those who were w'illing to hear some of the Doctrines of the New Church, which we believe was foretold by the AFTER MR. VEWENS MANNER. 327 symbolic figure of the New Jerusalem, descrnding from God out of heaven ; and if Mr. Ye wens had come to Toronto to declare what he believes the Apostles taught, I should have recognized his right to do so, without my interferenci'. However, if Mr. Yewcns regards it as his duty to challenge me, I have not t'.ie lea.'^t objection — only 1 ought to ex- pect that he will do it fairly, omitting those ad- jectives which cnly express his o[)inion8, or his prejudices. Mr. Yewens returns to my former re- marks on the relation of three names i)i the Old Testament, and the three relatively similiar names in the New, as designating the constituents of the One Divine Person of the Lord, as revealed before and after His coming into the world, and insists that those names do not designate aspects, or phases of character, of the One Divine Person, but separate and distinct persons, as proclaimed in the Athana- sian creed ; which creed, he says, " expresses the Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity." Certainly it can onlv be bv infcmnee that it does, because the word *' Persons,"" or " Three Persons,"" in relation to the Lord, never occurs in the Old or New Testa- ment. And the only ground on which that infer- ence is founded, is, the use of the words P'dthcr, Son, and lloJif Spirit, and their occasionally represen- tatively addressing each other. But the fallacy of this reasoning, as I have already shown, is evident from the clear and explicit teaching of the Scrip- ture itself. The Lord Jesus Christ was one Person, and he sayi The Father is in Mo, and I in Him" — 828 MY REPLY TO Hni, " He that Lath seen Me, Lath seen the Father" — " I and My Father are One" — manifestly One, as Soul and Body make one man ; or as the natural man and spiritual man, both for a time in one per- son, as the old man and the new man, and one or the other in the ascendancy, not one Person in another Person ! And the one addressing the other does not convey the idea of their being two sepa- rate persons, any more than it does when the man said : "I will say to my soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years," etc. ; or, " my soul thou hast trodden down strength ; " or, ** Why art thou cast down, my soulf and why art thou disquited within me ? Hope thou in God." But soul is not used in a personal sense ; no more is Father: if it were, the Devil might be our Father personally; for the Lord said — "Ye are of your Father, the Devil, and the works of your Father yo will do," etc. And the Ifoh/ Spirit (Saxon, Ghost), is not a Person; but, as I have already shown, is, in strict Enghsh, Breath. And Jesus breathed this Holy Breath of Life upon His Dis- ciples. He did not breathe a person upon them. Indeed, 1 have shown this so fully before, and no at- tempt has bien made to controvert what 1 have said, that I need not repeat it nj^ain. But instead of ad- mitting this, an effort is made to raise new ques- tions, which 1 regard as disingenuous. Let me add in further conliimation of what I have already said, that in all the Thcophanies in which the Lord is described as having been seen in both Old and New Testaments, and these cases are very many, it is AND HIS ERRORS SHEWN. 829* sepa- 3 man goods y soul 'Why t thou ' But Qore is ather f your leather Saxon, Iready Jesus is Dis- them. noat- e said, 1 of ad- ques- me add \y said, ord is id New y, it is ■^ always in One Personal form, as an infinitely glori- ous Divine Man, and never otherwise. Never in three personal forms, or two — never but in One. And what can, or ought to be, more convincing than this ? But, as I have said, Swedenborg is in- troduced, and that, too, as "an extravagant enthu- siast on the subject of religion." But Swedenborg was rather the reverse of this ; he certainly was no- enthusiast, but was one of the mildest, most mod- erate and amiable of men ; his manners were methodical, exact, and systematic, and this style pervades all his writings. Then, Mr. Yewens^ says that we receive " the opinions and fan- cies of Emanuel Baron Swedenborg, as of co- ordinate authority with the inspired Scriptures.'" Mr. Yewens ought to have known better than this ; and if he did not, it was unbecoming in him to say it, because it is not true. The highest claim we make for him is, a highly illuminated expounder of the Scriptures. And whilst professing to quote the words we use in our Baptismal service, he not only in- terpolates, but puts his interpolations in italics, as well as in quotation marks ! All those words fol- lowing are interpolated: " as revealed by the Lord in the writings of His servant, Enuiimel Sweden- borg." No such words are to be found either in the form used by us in England, the United States, or Canada. The alleged quotation from Article '6 of our Doctrines of Faith, is equally spurious : no such wonh arc there as: "containing a celestial and spiritual sense, in all and every part." Not that we should object to it ; but when an opponent «■ S30 WHERE THE FALSE TEACHING COMES IN, professes to quote oui- language, he should do it, as we ourselves give it ; when this is not done, a sinister motive is apt to be suggested. The lan- guage we use is as follows: "That the Sacred Scripture, or Word of God, is Divine Truth itself, containing a spiritual sense heretofore unknown, whence it is Divinely insi)ired and holy in every syllable, as well as a literal sense, which is the basis of its spiritual sense; find in which. Divine Truth is in its fulness, its sanctity, and its power." But to eke out the want of argument, and a truth- ful presentation of fact, we are told that '* warn- ing was given long ago in the writings of St. Paul, that in the latter days then; would l)e a wide- spread rebellion against the Truth of God, * * a,nd a multiplication of false teachings rtftd Chris- tian tonics." And that the comparatively insigni- ficant sect that has received the opinions and fancies of Emanuel iJaron Swedeuborg,'" is includ- ed among them. Well, well, I really think if Mr. Yewens had read Ecclesiastical History more carefully, ho need not have gone so far down the stream of time to discern who the Apostle alluded to : for even as early as the third and fourth cen- turies he would have found (inostics, and Arians, and Athanasians enough to liave veritied all the Apostle had said about false teachers. And these errors then propagated have been continueil to the present day ; and constitute what is now, with so much emphasis, designated as the Apostolic and Evaniu'llcal ClinicJi ,- wliethor as distributed among the various religious denominations as the compo- AND MR. Yl-WKNS SUMSIDES. 331 do it, ane, a e lan- Micred itself, Luown, every is the Divine »ower." , trutli- ' warn- t. Paul, I wide- * •*• I Chris- insigni- 113 and includ- tliink if rv more own the jiUuded rth cen- Arians, all the d these d to the with so tilic and 1 among compo- n nent parts of One ('liurcdi ; or whether as concen- trated in the one cxehisive Kcct, called the Church of England. They all alike helong to the former things which are to pass away, and usher in that New Dispensation (whiidi Mr. Y. regards so lightly), that was in-eligured hy the New Jerusalem in Re- velation xxi., not as a sect ; hut as a New Church. Yours truly, G. Field. Toronto, April 4th, 1876. It appeared however, as stated hy the Editor, that Mr. Yewens had a copy of one of the earlier Liturgies, puhhshed in London, in 1810, in which the words used were *' substantially the same as given in his letter last week." But this was non- important; as I distinctly said, ''Not that we should object to it;" but that it seemed like an undue straining to make a point, to go back to a form pu])lis]ied in Enghmd more than sixty years ago ; and which was utterly unknown to any per- sons now living. Mr. Yewens himself wrote a note to the Editor to say that being so near Easter Sunday he could not write that week; but the next, he would again buckle on the sword and finish his work : but Easter passed by, WJiit Sunday, Trinity, and all tlio holy dnys, and other diiys ; but Mr. Yuwons never returned to the charge ; and so again there was peace. But there were many now in Mount Forest that wanted to know more obout the Doc- trines of the New Church ; and after awhile an 1 832 REVISIT MOUNT FOREST. eflfort was made for me to return and deliver some more lectures ; which in due time 1 did. On the evening of April 11th, (1876), I delivered the first of a Course of three Lectures on the Spiritual World : but the time was unpropitious ; the Presbytery was then in session, and a case of great local importance was then before it. Three other Churches were also exercised in " revival " meetings ; and the roads were almost impassable with deep mud ; and the rain falHng all the time. Still I had very fair audiences ; but no opposition raised this time. A very fair and full abstract of these three Lectures appeared in the Examiner ; and soon after, the Confederate, (the other village paper), whose editor is a Ba^Dtist, j)ublished the following synopsis of them : — THE SPIRITUAL WORLD :- HEAVEN, HELL, AND- THE WORLD OF SPIRITS. The following is an account of the lectures de- livered, in the Town hall, here, by Eev. G. Field, of Toronto, week before last : — In commencing his first lecture Mr. Field gave as a reason for calling attention to this subject, the absence of all reliable information upon it, at this day, in the Christian world. Whilst it was almost universally admitted that there was a life after death, a heaven and a hell, it was claimed that no information existed as to their real character; where they were, or by what means they were reached, or what we should be, or be like, when there, and that the absence of any such knowledge is the cause of so much grief and desolation of ABOUT THE SPIRITUAL WORLD. 333 eliver L. Lvered n the bious ; ase of Three ivival " issable e time» )osition tract of xminer ; r village tied the .L, ANI> iurca de- Field, of Lcld gave )ject, the , at thia almost fe after I that no laracter ; hey were ike, when nowledge olation of lis feeling at the loss by death of our loved friends and children. This was iUustrated by quoting from a letter recently published in the most widely circu- lated religious periodical in America, in which the mother so pathetically bewails the loss of her darling child. *' The house," she says, " is cold and dark." I go from room to room, but there is no bright spot anywhere. His face was as the sun to me, it made everything bright ; and his voice, — how sweet it was ! But his lips are silent now. The light has gone out of his beautiful eyes, and his lovely presence has faded away. There is such a. void in my heart, and it aches so. Will it over be filled? Shall I ever find relief from the pain? I suppose it is wicked to feel so, l)ut 1 cannot help it. I try to be calm and to be reconciled. I know it is all for the best. I say it over and over again to myself: but I cannot feel so : the loneliness, and the aching, and the sadness will come." Then she says, she prostrates herself in humble supplica- tion before the Lord, and tries to believe that (iod is merciful and just whilst yet her heart rebels. Then she appeals to the editor of the paper, — a minister of world-wide reputation, — to give her some assur- ance of the welfare and whereabouts of her child. But he could give her no such relief; he knew no more of the condition of her child than she did, and could only offer some common-place platitudes about resignation, and trust, and time, as the great consoler. Indeed, he said, in regard to those who pass through the gate of death, " It behoves us to be very modest." " Men know so little, and con- 334 NOTHINO KNOWN OF HEAVEN, jecture so much about it, that we tliink a profoun(? conviction of liiiuian ignorance in regard to the details of a futiirehl'e would be exceedingly healthy."" And this response might l)e stereotyped for multi- tudes of otlicrs ; at least such was the ojiinion of the lecturer. Mr. F. then alluded to the prevalent opinion in the Christian world of heaven l)eing somewhat up high above the clouds, or the stars, as originating in the exceedingly literal interpreta- tion given to descriptions which are purely sym- bolical: and also as being a tradition from the ideas formed during the dark and media3val ages, when the stars were supposed to be either the paving stones of heaven, or openings in the crystal sphere surrounding the earth, through which the angels looked to behold the doings of the dwellers upon earth; whilst hell was somewhere in the bowels of the earth, of which the craters of burning mountains were the entrance. And that preachers drew upon their fancy or imagination to produce sensational impressions of the happiness or the misery of these two regions. But, said Mr. Field, there is no assured knowledge or reliable informa- tion given, or believed to be possessed by any of the religious denominations in the Christian world on this important subject. We follow our friends through sickness and suffering to the gate of death, and there we part with them, and they are to us afterwards as a total blank ; professedly believing in a spiritual world, but yet know no more of it than by name. And instead of lifting up our eyes to the world to which they have gone, we only do. OR WHAT CONSTITUTES IT. 835. ountl ) the thy.; aulti- ion of talent ])emg stars, preta- sym- m the ,1 a}:!;es, ler the crystal ich the Uvellers in the lUining leachers nrodace or the . Field, iorma- any of ,11 world friends if death, e to us elieving •re of it |our eyes only do. as the gentile sisters of Lazarus did, — go to the grave to weep there. And yet, knowing no more than this, we say, " Sliftll wo, whoso souls are lighted By wisdom from on high ; Bhall we to man, bcnighttd, The lamp of life deny ?" Mr. F. then referred to the assured knowledge which these gentile nations Lad of thc^ reality and organic existence of the spiritual world ; alluding to the teachings of Plato, Socrates, and others ; re- marking how it had been said of them, " See how these old heathen shame us." Now, said Mr. F., either there is a spiritual world ; or, there is not. And the universal Christian Church acknowledges there is. But if so, what is it that constitutes it such '? In illustration of the meaning of this ques- tion, he said, there is also a material world ; but of what does this world consist ? Is it not composed of mountains, bills, valleys, plains, woods, gardens, cities, mansions, etc. ? And are not all these com- posed of material substance ? If there was no material substance where would they be ? And so, by parity of reason, the spiritual world must be composed of spiritual substance, or it could have no existence. All its " Sweet fields beyond the swell- ing flood," its "never withering flowers," its hills and vales, its palms and crowns, and harps of gold, are not idealities, but realities, and are as certainly composed of the spiritual substances of that world, as their counterparts are of material substance in this. But if it be denied there are ill :tJ3r> 8T. AUGUSTINE 8 ARGUMENT. 1:1: such things there, then what is there there ? Is there anything'! If so, what ? — for whatever it may he it must be composed of spiritual substance. And it there is nothing there — then there is no spiritual world at all. This, said the lecturer, is the only alternative we can come to. And that there are such things there, was illustrated and •elucidated by numerous evidences. One case was that of a remarkable dream recorded by St. Au- gustine. His friend Sennadius, although amiable and virtuous, did not believe in a spiritual world ; but he dreamed one night that a radiant youth •came to him, and took him to a city, where he heard sweet and heavenly music and singing. Soon after he awoke ; after which he fell asleep again, when the same youth came to him as before and asked him if he remembered him. He said he did. Then he asked liim if it was whilst asleep or awake that he had seen him. 1 was sleeping, he said. True, he replied, it was in your sleep that you heard and saw these things ; and what you now see and hear is also in your sleep. Where then is your material body ? In my bed-chamber, he replied. But, he said, are not the eyes of that body closed and inactive. With what eyes then do you see these tilings / But, as he could not answer, the youth said : As the eyes of your body, which now lie asleep, are inactive and useless, and yet you have eyes by which you see me and other things, so after death, when the eyes of your ma- terial body will fail you, you will find yourself as now with a spiritual body and organs, by which ALL EVIDENCE DENIED. 337 you will see. Doubt therefore no longer that there is a life after death. And Sennadius said, I was convinced, and all doubt removed. Mr. F. then referred to the remarkable case of Nicolai, the philosopher of Berlin, and his peculiar intromission into the adjacent regions of the spiritual world ; and the people that he saw there as distinctly as anything that ever he saw in this world ; and yet, because he did not and would not believe there was a spiritual world, he endeavored to account for these appearances by attributing them to a diseased imagination or a depraved state of the bodily organ- ization, as if disease or disorder could create and produce living human beings, who could talk to him, and even try to console and comfort him ; whilst at other times, by his own volition, he never could succeed in reproducing the faintest appear- ance of them. Mr. F. especially called attention to the case of the young man of Elisha, at the time the Israelites were threatened by the overpowering numbers of the Syrian army, and his saying to Elisha, " Alas ! my master, wiiat shall we do ?" And EHsha prayed to the Lord that He would open his eyes that he might see. It was evident, he said, that it was not his physical sight that was opened, as it was because that w<(s open],. that he was alarmed at what he saw. It must, therefore, have been his spiritual sight, i. e., the sight of his spiritual body, which was further evident from the fact of his seeing the mountains around filled with chariots and horses of fire, which things do not exist in the material world. Thus, he argue d, it w 838 THE INTERMEDIATE WORLD. is evident that the spiritual world is as near to us as the material world ; and that it is only the veil of flesh which separates the one world from the other. And that when angels were seen, they were seen in their own world, by the opening of the spiritual sight, which at once disclosed them ; and as it was gradually closed again, so they seemed to vanish. Mr. F. then referred .to the way in which thoughts come to us ; often altogether un- expected, and imparting ideas that we never had before. We do not create them ourselves, nor do they come to us from the dead things around us, for they are not in them ; but they come to us, or flow into us, from the spiritual world around us, although to us unconsciously. The rev. gentleman commenced his second lecture by affirming that the Scriptures as plainly and dis- tinctly revealed a world intermediate between heaven and hell, as the common receptacle of all who leave the world by death, as they do heaven and hell themselves, and that this was not only known and believed in the primitive Christian church but also in the Jewish, and in the churches preceding the Jewish, the traditions of which exist among all heathen nations. And it had never been questioned in the Christian church until it was repudiated by Luther, and this because, as he afHrmod, it had been pet verted and corrui)ted into r jif purgatorial punishment, out ♦" *'■ could be delivered by priestly ap. n f i the offering up of masses, and mus nifio a source of extortion and revenue to the THE SPIRITUAL IMAOED BY THE NATUHAL. 339 church. And in protesting against those abuses the early Reformers not only rejected the errors and the abuses, but also repudiated and denied the existence of any such world at all. And in trans- lating the Scriptures they corrupted the text in such a way as to wipe out the evidence they so clearly present of this tnost important truth. Mr. Field explained this by stating that, both in the Old Testament and in the New, the spiritual world was described as being tri-partite, and that these regions are described and pictured by the scenery of the natural world and by such objects as would bear a correspondent relation to them. Thus, he said, there is a natural heaven where the sun, planets, moon, and stars are ; but this is not the heaven where the angels live, but is only a type or symbol of it. So also there is a natural hell ; this is that region which is on the South of Jeru- salem — a dark, gloomy, desolate place, where all impure and filthy things were cast and burnt, the flames of which were never extinguished ; where sacrifices were offered to Moloch, and the degrad- ing .scenes connected with the worship of Baal, Asliteroth, etc., were ex]iil)ited. This, he said, was the natural hell, Gia-h'uni 01)1,01' the Valley of Hin- nom, also called the Valley of Slaughter, and Toi)het, and was used as the symbol of the spiritual hell, where the wicked would dwell after death. But, besides these two regions, there was an inter- mediate one, described by the Hebrew word shcol. But the translators of the Bible into English have in almost all cases, rendered this word hell, too. 11 340 EACH WORLD TRI-PARTITE. although it has no such meaning. But in some places, where it was so self-evident that it could not mean hell, they have translated it grave. Thus, when Jacob was persuaded to believe that Joseph had been slain and devoured by wild beasts, he says, in his grief, "I shall go down into sheol unto my son mourning." But the translators make iiim say, ** I shall go down into the grave to my son," etc. But Jacob no more thought his son was in the grave than he did that he was in hell. SJteol is the intermediate world between heaven and hell, the common receptacle of all departed spirits im- mediately after death. It is in that world they are judged, and go from thence either to heaven or hell. And these three regions of the spiritual world are, in the Hebrew Scriptures, named Sha- mayim, (Heavens), Sheol (World of Spirits), and Gia-hintwm, (Hell). And in the New Testament the answering Greek words are : Uranos, Hades and Gehenna. And the Septuagint, in translating the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek, invariably use the word Hades for the Hebrew Sheol. And that Gehennaifi the Greek of Gia-hinnom needs no proof. Mr. Field illustrated the above by a diagram, some- thing like this, in which he showed the relation of these departments to each other, and their names in each language. Thus : — HEBREW. GREEK. ENGLISH. Shaiiiayim. Uranos. Heavens. Sheol. Hades. World of Spirits. Gia-hinnom. Gehenna. Hell. The translators, he said, had taken the same liberty -. •■• ♦^^I' SHEOL AND HADES. 341 ;irits. iberty with the Greek word Hades that they had with the Hebrew Sheol ; always translating it either as hell, or as the grave, when yet it means neitlier. Thus, in one place, they make the Scriptures read, "Death and hell were cast into the lake of fire," whereas the lake of fire is hell ; thus it would mean that hell was cast into hell. But it is "Death and Hades,'' or all those who were spiritually dead (the wicked) in Hades were removed into Hell. Mr. F. further explained that Hades, or Sheol, was the tri- partite : the depths of Sheol, or the land of dark- ness below, being separated from the inferior para- dise, which is above. It was in this paradise where the malefactor on the cross would meet the Lord immediately after death, i. c, in the upper regions of Sheol. So also, he said, the answering word Hades is also tri-partite, its upper region being Elysium, — the same as the inferior paradise of Sheol, — and its lower region Tartarus, — the same as the gloomy abodes of Sheol. It was in Hades, said Mr. F., where the rich man and Lazarus met after death, and not heaven nor hell. But Dives was in that place called Tartarus, and Lazarus in Elysium, with only a chasm or gulf between them. Heaven, or rather heavens, in the i^lural, as it almost al- ways occurs, said Mr. F., in harmony with a uni- versal anplogy, was also three-fold, or composed of three distmctive heavens, to the highest of which (the third), the Apostle Paul aftirms he was once admitted. The hells, in like manner, consisting of three : but that in each of these (heavens and hells) there are innumerable societies, all, as it were gra- 342 WHO GO TO HEAVEN OR HELL. ded, according to the state and quality of the life of those who dwell there : and that the mere fact of ad- mission into heaven would not give happiness, hut that the quality of the life of each constitutes the happiness, or conversely, the misery of each. And that the Lord admits no one into heaven, by a mere act of mercy, or by entreaty, for if they were so admitted they would not be happy, unless their life was heavenly. And for the same reason the Lord casts no one into hell, or sends them there to punish them, but that they go there as by a law of spiritual gravitation, each being drawn to his like, as "Birds of a feather will flock together." Mr. F. said a good deal more on this subject, which we are obliged to oniit, but the whole opened up, as it were, a new realm of thought, which, whether true or not, is certainly interesting, and in the way in which it was presented by the Lecturer, could not fail to be practical and useful. The weather during Mr. Field's visit was very unfavor- able, the roads exceedingly muddy, and it was rain- ing mos*- of the time, in addition to which the Pres- bytery wiia in session and important local and reli- gious matters were occupying the attention of very many ; but all who attended the lectures seemed to be much interested in them. Thus ended my work at Mount Forest : quite a number became interested in, and favorable to the New Cliurch Doctrines ; but there was not sufficient money in the Treasury of the Association to meet the expenses of further Missionary efforts ; and so the seeds thus sown have not been watered. And f' lii TORONTO ANNIVERSARY. 343 this, with the exception of another sermon dehvered in Strathroy, at the annual meeting of the Association in July, 1876, was all the work I did outside of Toronto, during the five years of my residence there. In the city itself I preached and lectured regularly on the Sabbath, save the few times when absent attending Conventions, meet- ings of Associations ; or occasional Missionary work. During that time I baptized into the faith of the New Church, more than one hundred per- sons — adults and children ; the majority of whom were adults ; and although many were constantly leaving to reside in other localities, yet the Society constantly increased in numbers, and every effort was made that we were able to make, to extend a knowledge of these Doctrines to others. Some- times a syllabus of the proposed Course of Lec- tures was printed and circulated over the City by the Post Office, the Newspaper, and by private effort ; sometimes Sermons published and scattered in a similar manner. Every year tho com- mencement of the Society was commemorated by a public social entertainment, and l)y Addresses suited to the occasion. At the eleventh Anniver- sary, in 1875, one of the members prepared and delivered a metrical essay in which he forecast the manner in which the 70th Anniversary, (in 1934), would bo celebrated. The scene was laid in the "Educational Metropolis of the Dominion of Canada;" and in the ''spacious Lecture Hall of the University, on Swodenborg Street, and almost in the centre of the great city of ;JO(),003 inhabi- I ■■■ 344 EVENTS ANTICIPATED, tants. The scene (lie says), is a brilliant one, up- wards of 5,000 persons are assembled, and the Chief servant of the people, who is the Iluler of the Dominion (he omits his titled, by special request, oc- cupies the Chair. The soft, but bright electric light, illuminates the Hall, and lights up the lively, intel- lectual and comely countenances of the assembled thousands ; and the decorations of the Hall glow with the living beauty of flowers in clusters, with rich and artistic painted landscapes and portraits, and groups of truthful statuary symbolically arran- ged." " It is (he says), a happy, hopeful, loving gath- ering, a picture true of scenes oft seen in Paradise." Then the speaker, '* an aged man," whose *' hair is white with four score winters' tinge," makes his Address ; and in his retrospective review of the amazing developments, and wonderful improve- ments of the past century, thus alludes to the time they were then commemorating: " 'Twas ou the sixth Of this, the present month, that iu that year, Was held th' eleventh annual mental feast Of this Society ; and I was there, A well f,u'«^\n youth, just ent'riiig manhood's life." " We met ; not in this spacious, hfuuteous hall, But .71 an humble Temple, imadorued, Though dedicate to wisdom and to love, And to the Lord, essentially their source." " A lowly band they were That gathered into Elm Street New Church fold." ' ' To them the daily, weekly press, was closed ; " And Doctors of Divinity most wise, Did point the finger at them, oft in scorn ; And then would laugh at the conceit absurd. That one Gkoroe Field could set them all aright, In Doctrine and Theology." ' fc. AND PROSPECTS CLOUDED. 345 But alas, if this was the prospect then, how soon the vision faded ! We cannot forecast the future ; we do not even know what a day may hring forth. It is only in the present that we hve ; and though that present is pregnant with all the future, we cannot see it until it is born. But if we make the present right, we need have no fear but that the future will do justice to it. In that present all our duty lies; and all our effort should be to make it accord with the orderly operations of the Divine Providence ; and to be at one with the Divine Love and the Divine Wisdom : then, however obscure, or dark it may have been in the past, tlie future will be bright and cloudless ; and there will be no night there : but it " shall be as the light of the morning, when the sun risetli ; even as a morning without clouds ; as the tender grass springing out of the earth by clear shining after rain." 2 Sam. 23:4. I have now briefly passed in review forty years of varied, settled, and Missionary life in the Western States and in Canada ; from the time when neither the name of Swedenborg, or the New Church had ever been heard in this newly settled region of the habitable Globe, to the time when, notwithstanding all discouragements and difticul- ties, they are stranger sounds no longer ; and the receivers of these Doctrines are scattered as seed blown by the wind over almost all that widi) region which these memories have traversed. But few of those who first received and lovingly embraced these heavenly Doctrines, are yet lingering so- journers here; one by one they have successively 346 HAVE THE BEST MEANS BEEN USED? passed away, and I can almost say I alone remain to tell the story, or to write the record.* And in review of all the past, the question forcibly presents itself for consideration, — Have the means that have been employed in the various efforts that have been made for the promulgation of these Doc- trines been the wisest, or the most judicious ? Or is there no lesson to be gathered from the experi- ence of the past ? My own convictions, arising both from theory and practice are, that, if they could be realized, it would be I jtter to make more concen- trated efforts : to establish as many, or as few centres as means would permit, and build up cir- cumferences around them ; rather than scatter so broad-cast, without the means of cultivating and fostering the tender germs in their isolated and far apart localities, where, surrounded by uncon- genial relations, they dwindle away, and leave no seed behind them. A Society of as many as six persons holding meetings for worship every Sabljath, establishing a Sunday School ; and visited by a [Missionary regularly once a month, or even once * Siuce my ordination in 1848, I liave baptized into tlie faith of tho New Church, tlie following number of persons, viz : Adults, 205 ; Children, 215. Total, 510. Of these, there were in the Michigan and N. lud. Associa- tion : Adults, 170 : Children, 1 17. Total, ;U7. And of these, tliere were in Detroit: Adults, 100; Children, 70. Total, 170. And in Toronto, (Canada): Adults, 55; Childx'en, l-l. Total, yy. In addition to which there were 20 Confirmations. A large number of the above have siuce passed into the Spiritual World. ■^^^l :\IINGLING OLD WITH NEW. 847 in three months, together with a New Church Library for gratuitous circulation, (and one or more New Church periodicals), would be far more efl&cient than all the occasional and irregular efforts of the most talented Ministers (although at much greater expense), could ever accomplish. Especial- ly is it desirable to cultivate a united feeling ; and for all to find guidance and direction under one common law ; and that, the Divine Law (as enun - ciated in the Doctrines of the New Church), be ac- cepted as supreme : — not mingling the old with the new ; for it is that which makes conflict and division ; and yet, in the transition from the one to the other, this is often found to be so difficult to avoid. And there are so many who from time to time are attracted by the beauty and the ration- ality of these heavenly Doctrines ; who, often with a merely cursory and imperfect knowledge of their real character and requirements, class them with some of the liberalistic notions of the Jige ; or under the broad banner of freedom and charity, seek to establish some dogma or opinion of tlieir own self- derived int^^lligcnce, aud demand that it shall be recognized and adopted as the glorious privilege of the New Church ! It is the same feeling, and the same spirit that infused itself into the early Christian Church ; and divided and tore it asunder : and the same enemy is sowing the same seeds amongst the converts to the faith of the New Jerusalem. But we have every confidence to believe that with the increasing power and clfulgence of these Divine Truths, it will only be necessary clearly 348 GREAT CHANGES. to understand them, to see their unity, their order, and their harmony; and for all who embrace them to stand unitedly together under one banner, and under one Law ; and so to co-operate as to pro- duce one common efifect — then will Jerusalem be- come a praise in the earth, for then will "the glory of the Lord be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together." And when I contemplate what has already been done in preparing the way for the Second Coming of the Lord, in the power and glory of His Divine Truth ; although in the prepara- tion of the soil there may have been many difficulties to encounter, yet the way of the Lord is onward ; and amid all discouragements there has always been so much to comfort and sustain. And in writing this record of the past, and of the varying events which have occurred since the doctrines of the New Church were first proclaimed in these broad regions of the Western world, very many things will have unquestionably been omitted, which in a history would have been inexcusable ; but this does not profess to be a history ; but rather personal reminiscences ; and being such, will, I am fully aware very often present an ap- pearance of egotism which I would fain have avoid- ed : but it did not seem practicable for mo to do so without casting the whole narrative into an his- torical form, in which aspect its shortcomings would have been more manifest, and more object- ionable than in its present less pretentious charac- ter. I have recorded all that I remember, that appears to me to be of importance ; and I have MATERIALS FOR HISTORY. 349 undoubtedly inserted many things that some will think had far better have been left out ; but then it would not have had that stamp of idiosyncracy which is really a part of the record. As it is, I present it to the members and friends of the Church at large as so much material out of which, when the time conies, the future historian of the Church may gather information for a more perfect digest. Anjtnow, although my work is done, as far, and as well, as 1 could do it, my thoughts and feelings still retrospectively linger over the scenes and the events of the past ; over all the way which the Lord my God hath led me these forty years in the wilderness : and though sometimes suffered to hunger, yet oft-times fed with manna when I did not see from whence it came : — in every trial and difficulty I have been led and cared for ; and 1 know that I have been wonderfully sustained and preserved when all seemed dark before me ; and my heart is tilled with gratitude and thankfulness for all these mercies ; and in its inmost recesses " This ono, long-loved remembrauce yet, Lives like the dark soft violet there." THE END. APPENDIX. [REFERRED TO AT PAGE 243. J ADDRESS ON THE SACRAMENTS OF BAPTISM, AND THE SUPPER^ BY EEV. G. FIELD, Presiding Minister, Delivered before the Michvian and N. Indiana Asso- ciation of the New Church, at the A7imial Meeting, held at Marshall, October 29, 1859. Dear Brethren,— In accordance with establish- ed usage, I present to you an annual address. Dififerent subjects have been presented to 5'ou for consideration or adoption, from year to year, bear- ing more or less upon the states and needs of the Church, — its progressive order and establishment on earth. And we now seem to have come to the consideration of its ordinances and sacraments, and what is or should be required concerning them ; and as your minds have all been doubtless some- what exercised upon this subject during the past year, and as it now comes l)efore us not only in a practical form, but in one which the welfare of the Church requires should be, if possible, properly understood and definitely settled, it has, therefore, 862 THE TWO GATES. seemed to me desirable to invite your undivided attention to some remarks concerning it. The Sacraments of Baptism and the Holy Supper are of Divine institution. They are, as it were, the ligaments or nexus uniting the Church on earth with the Church in heaven. They take the place in the Christian Church of all the rituals and sacrifices in the Jewish, and correspond to the uses of the heart and lungs in the human body. It cannot, therefore, but be important that we should have a true knowledge of our duty in regard to them: and, in what I shall now say, you will perceive that I appeal to no arbitrary rule or law, to no decision of merely human authority, or dic- tate of societies, associations, or conventions, but to the law and the testimony; i.e., to the Divine law and to the testimony concerning it in the writings of the Church, and in such light as shall enable it to be clearly seen by every rational mind. And, in order that it may be thus seen, we ought to know, first, what Baptism is, or what it means, before we can determine what is the duty of the Church in regard to it, or what is its relation to the Sacrament of the Supper. Baptism, says Swedenborg, is ** introduction into the Christian Church," and takes the place of circumcision, which was introduction into the Jewish Church. The Church is described as a city, with walls and gates ; and as a vineyard, with a hedge around it ; and as a sheepfold, with a door or sheepgate ; or as a tabernacle and temple, with inner and outer doors {ostium and janua); and these doors or BAPTISM AND THE eUPPER. 353 ision, eb. walls L'ound gate; outer gates are the modes of inlet therein. And these "two sacraments — Baptism and the Holy Supper are, as it were, (the) two j^ates to eternal life," of which Baptism is the first or outer gate, and the Holy Supper the inner (T.C.ll. 721); and that the Lord is Himself the door, and tluit it is by Him, or by the acknowledgment of Him as the alone shep- herd of His fold, the true vino of His vineyard, the tree of life of His garden, the Lord of His heavenly Kingdom, or the alone God in His Divine Humanity in His Cinirch, that entrance can h) had. To make any other confession or acknowltHlgment, or to come in any other way, is to be a thief and a robber, because it robs the Lord of what is exclu- sively His. About this there can be no possible doubt in the mind of any one who professes to re- ceive our doctrines at all. But there are some who may think that bai)tisni is not required as an ex- ternal act, but is only an internal or spiritual operation ; and, therefore, that the non-observance of this ritual should be no bar or hindrance to partaking of the Holy Supper. Neither, indeed, should it, if both are placed on the same ground ; as, of course, they ought to be: i.e., if baptism is only to be regarded as an uitcniul and spiritual act, so also, by parity of reason, should the Holy Sup- per be also ; and thus the one should be partaken of in the same manner as the other. But if it is claimed that the baptismal sacrament at the outer door is only an internal operation, but the euchar- istic sacrament at the inner door is an outward , external, and visible one, it must be seen to be so t rt-i-"ii r^i'-'-YuHim 854 Till-: ESSENTIAL OF HAPTISM. inconsistent and so unrea^sonable as to need no re- futation. It is to those, therefore, who recognize and acknowledge that bai)tisni also is an outward and visible act, the sign and token of an internal and spiritual one, that these remarks are more especially offered. If the Holy Supper is a sig- niticative, external, and visible ordinace, it is be- cause it is a constitiu-nt part of an organic; and visible church, of which the l)aptisnial service is the outer and introductory door. To these pre- mises it also supposed no exception will be taken. If, therefore, we are only agreed as to irhat consti- tutes tluit Ixiptisni, the question must at once be settled. But, as this is with some the disputed point, it will now be necessary to have it clearly understood. It is commonly supposed that Baptism is onlv a ceremonial form of Christianity, the mode of which is by innncrsion, pouring, or siu'inkling with water, by a Minister, and his pronouncing over the head of the candidate the formula of words commanded by the Lord, or, as Swedenborg says, t'jat " any one might say or mutter to himself, ' What is bai)tism but the pouring of water on the head ".*'" and that it is nothing more than a cere- mony (T.C.Il. GOT), if this were so, however, it might as well be dispensed with altogether ; for, in the New Church, mere emi)ty forms can be of no value, and will never be tolerated, because they have no virtue in them, and are, therefore, utterly use- less. But the essential of baptism, (which is the rea- son why^ifc is admission or introduction into the Cliurch), is the achwiclahjnicnt of the Lord and Jus no re- ;ognizo utward nternal e more a sig- , is be- lie and rvice is 'se pre- > taken. t consti- onre be lisputed , clearly Ijoptism Ibe mode rinkling lomieing of words )rg says, iiimself, on the a cere- wover, it ; for, in be of no u y have eriy use- the rea- iiito the / (tnd his ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE LORD. 355 commandments, or law of life ; and that, in this Divinely commanded ritual, the first thing which is required to be done, is to make a declaration and profession of faith, which is certified to by the sign and seal which the minister imposes in the presence of the Lord, and the congregation before whom that profession of faith is made. But this profes- sion of faith may be a true or n.faUc one. If it be a false faith ; if it declares a belief in a tripersonal God, a vicarious atonement, and a resurrection of the flesh : or if this is understood or implied, and the candidate assents to it, and desires (or, if an in- fant, his parents desire for him) to l)e initiated and inaugurated into its acknowledgment, as is done in the various sects of the former and now consum- mated cliurch, — which is there coniirnied by testi- fication, imposition of hands, and the application of water to the body, — how can any one believe that this is tlie door of adinission into the New Jerusalem '} Or can anv one, who for a moment thinks it is, be a proper and suitable person to be a member of tbe New Church, or to come to the table of the Lord thereof, bearing with him the ensign of a tripersonal Deity? It would be like the subject of a foreign nation bringing his flag with him, and under it, cLiiraing the privileges of an American citizen. Is it not in reason, does it not commend itself to the convictions of even the most simple mind, that admission into any constituted or organized body, whetlier it bo civil or ecclesias- tical, political or moral, requires the candidate to acknowledge and profess his acceptance of the 856 ENTRANCE BY THE GATE. J principles, covenant, constitution, or articles of that body, either by an oath, or solemn public de- claration, sign, or seal, or both? Neither is this ever left to his voluntary choice, but is obligatory. And is not this profession the very essential of that covenant? Of what use ^vould the forms and ceremonies be, unless they were to ratify and con- firm that declaration? or of what avail would the ceremonial of baptism be, without the profession of faith, of which it is only the corresjjondent sign and seal ? And is not the Sacrament of the Holy Supper the inmost act of Divine worship ? Is it not denoted by the inner gate of the temple-wor- ship, or the Holy of Holies, around which tliere is a plain, and bej^ond which is the wall of the outer gate ? (T.C.E. 0G9) And at this outer gate all must come in who come at all. There the gospel of the Lord is proclaimed, inviting men to come. There Teter stands, with his keys, to teach the truths of faith, and to admit those who receive them; or, rather, thei the Lord Himself stands the Divine Truth itself, which Peter represents, and vhich is to be received and acknowledged : and it is there where the servants of God receive His seal in their forehead. And there is no other way or mode of admissioH, no other path, no other gate, and no other faith, because no other Lord and Saviour than the Lord Jesus Christ in his Divine Humanity : r, as Swe- denborg says, " the^e is only one true faith ; and that is in the Lord God, the Saviour Jesus Christ, the God of heaven and earth." But he says, there is TO WHAT IT INTPODUCES. 357 cles of blic de- is this igatory. iitiiil of ms and id con- Ill] d the ^fession mt sign le Holy ? Is it :)le-\vor- tliore is le outer ^ate all ) gospel come, ich the receive stands^ [its, and and it lis seal mission, r faith, le Lord as Swe- nd that ist, the ,here is a spurious faith " with those who climb up some other way ; " one which " adopts the falscs of heresies," and which is an adulterous faith ; one " which acknowledges three Lords of one church, — a faith which is meant by those of whom the Lord speaks where he says, " Verily I say unto you, He that goetli not in through the door into the sheepfold, but climbcth up some other way, is a thief and a robber" (T.C.ll. 378-380). Now, let it be remembered, it is not merely said that a person should thus believe, (or should say that he be^^ves) in this faith in order to enter the gate, but that his profession must also be certified and sealed, and thus take the solemn obligation of an oath. And the formal rite of baptism is that act of certification; which is why "he that be- lie veth and is baptized (into that belief), shall be saved : " and every one, who believes in the ordin ance at all, admits it by saying, " 1 have been baptized," even though be must know that his baptismal vow was in a spurious faith,- -the faith of a church no longer in existence, — into a church which " was Christian only in name, but not ia essence and reality." (T.C.R. G()8). How, then, has such a person approached the inner sanctuary, or the table of the Lord of the New Jerusalem ? There are but these two univer- sal gates ; and Baptism is the outer one, the only door of introduction into the organic church ; and the essential thereof is the acknowledgment of the Lord in his Divine Humaiuty, as revealed in the doctrines of tne New Jerusalem : because, as 358 WHO ARE TO BE RliCEIVED. Swedenborg says, " the knowledge of the Lord is the universal of all things of doctrine, and thence of all things of the Church : (because) from it all the worship derives its life and soul ; for the Lord is the all-in-all in heaven and the Church, and thence the all-in-all in worship " (A.E. i;i25). If this acknowledgment is, therefore, the gate of the church, then how did he gain admission without making it? And, if he did not so gain admission, on ■what plea can he even persuade himself that it is his privilege to enter the door of the innrr temple of the New Jerusalem before he does gain admission by thus passing through the door of its outer tab- ernacle ? And yet it is said that this is an open question in the Clmrcli, or that there are differences of opinion concerning it among its members. There may, indeed, be differences of opinion re- garding it among professed receivers of the doc- trines ; but the teachings of the Word and the doctrines of the Church give no uncertain sound. Indeed, they are most plain and explicit ; and they appear to come home to the reason with an irres- tible conviction. And not only does Swedenborg say that none may enter the gates of the New Jerusalem but those who are in these truths derived from the good of love, but that, *' if such as are aliens enter, they are not received, because they are not in agreement ; and, in this case, they either depart of their own accord, on account of their not being able to bear that light, or they are cast out.'' (A.K. 922). They are those described by the Lord as not having on the wedding garment. CIRCUMCISION AMONG THE JEWS. 359 they A precisely similiar obligation and reqnirement was comnmmlcd in the Jewish as in the Christian Church ; the only dilYercnce being, that, instead of Baptism, their outward sign and seal of the cov- enant l)etween man and the Lord was Circumcision, • — corresponding to the circumcision of the heart ; which was, loving ''the Lord our God with all the heart and with all the soul." (Deut. xxx. 0). And a? circumcision denoted the character and quality of the faith professed by the Jew, as distinctive and peculiar from that of the surrounding nations ; so also baptism into the faith of the Now Church » in a like manner, distinguishes it from that of the surrounding sects who are in a spurious or false faith. And no one was allowetl to eater the inner sanctuary of the temple who had not been circum- cised ; " for *' thus saith the Lord God, No stranger, uncircumcised in heart or uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter into my sanctuary, of any stranger that is among the children of Israel." (hlzok. xliv. 7, 9). The children of Israel were prone to admix their wor- ship with tlie idolatries of the surrounding nations. They were willing to mingle with them at their altars, and to unite with them at their saoritlcos ; which, throughout the Word, is every where de- nounced as denoting spiritual adultery. Thus : "They sacrilice [with the Gentiles upon the tops of the mountains, and burn incense upon the hills." (See IIos. iv. 12, &;3.). And thef/ wore willing also to receive them at the altars of Jehovah, in despite of the Divine prohibition. They were commanded, through the Prophet Ezekiel, to observe "all th^ or- „__ X— 360 INTEIINAL KErUGNANCE. i!i dinances of the lioiise of Jehovah, and all the laws thereof, and marlv well theenterin^-in of the house ;'' and the rebellious sons of Israel were constantly pro- hibited from permittinf? it to be desecrated. "In that ye have brought into my sanctuary strangers, uncircumcised in heart and uncircumcised in flesh, to be in my sanctuary to pollute it, even my house, where ye offer m^' bread " (Ezek. xliv. 5-7). This intermingling of the true with the false, is also rep- resented by the Jews marrying wives of Ashdod ; of whom it is said, " Their children spake half in the speech of Ashdod, and could not speak in the Jews' language." (Neh. xiii. 28, 24). There may, indeed, sometimes seem to be a principle of good within : but, so long as it is con- joined to an external profession of what is false, it speaks through it, producing an uncertain sound ; and the good within is delivered over to those who seek to destroy it, as Samson was, when he married a daughter of the Philistines. In such case, the real quality of that good seems to be doubtful ; for we know that every one is intcrnaUy joined to his own love, even without his being conscious of it. And, if that love is not in a genuine affection for truth, it will seek to avoid making an open profes- sion of it. There will be felt not only an internal repugnance to doing so, but often a moral inability to do it. It will be like the Ephraimites, who would fain have passed for the men of Gilead; but, when they tried to say shibboleth, they always said sibboleth ! And Swedenborg says, that, in the spiritual world, those who do not internally ) AVHEJ; IN NO (iKNllNE lAlTH. aei V 1 believe tliat Jkshs is the one only Lord ramut say so ; but that those who had confirnicd them- selves in the doctrine of a Trinity of persons, when they tried to say ''Our (rod,'' "twisted and folded their lips into many folds, and could not articulate"' it. They could say ''Christ," and also " (iod tlir Father;'' but they could not Bay " One God," neither could they say "* Divine jliiman," because, in their interior thought, they did not recognize it (T.C.Pi). 111. And it can only be for a similar reason, however much it may be con- cealed from us, that there is in this world such a repugnance to openly avowing it, or to making this profession at the door of the New Jerusalem. Many are willing to come to the inner door, where no such 2>rofessi(»i is required to be made, who are yet unwilling to come in through the outer door, where it is required ; although that door is always open, and they are continually invited to come in thereat. This peculiar state is very clearly illus- trated bv the Ilev. 11. Edleston, in the case of the pilgrim seeking the Immortal Fountain, who, when she came to the Gate of Obedience, "felt an oppres- sive pain upon her forehead," and her sight became dim ; and, when the angels saw this (ho Hays), " they sighed, and tears of pity rolled down their cheeks :" so she " was compelled to withdraw to the outside of the gate. " We know by this (said the first angel), that you cannot reach the fountain; for none can breathe the air of our land but those who in spirit and life are like us. Now, this gate is closed against no comer ; for it is the will of our I §i 302 A TRUE AND ORDERLY LAW. great blaster that all slioukl outer : but, when any one retires with pain [or repu;^nance| , we perceive that he is as yet^ unfit to pass through our land." Hence it is that a gate is a test of litness for enter- ing into a new state : for, if any one feels an internal repugnance to its quality or character, there will he an unwillingless to make such public avowal and testification. It is probably for a similar reason that many foreigners never become naturalized in this country ; because, though will- ing to avail themselves of tho advantages of its government and laws, the}' are internally attached to the land of their birth. And because this is so, and because it is seen and admitted by all nations and people to be orderly and right, every govern- ment, society, or constituted organic body, has required such a test of litness, of faith, or of obedi- ence, before admission. Thus the requirement of a profession of faith being made at the door of the Church, and the conlirmation thereof by the sign and seal of baptisnuil waters and benediction, is neither arbitrary nor miusual, but most orderly and proper ; and it is dillicult to conceive of a valid objection to it. The fallacy of the reason sometimes alleged, of hari)i(j been htipt'Lrcd, when it means no more than having been duly initiated into the acknowledgment of a tripersonal God, and the doctrine of faith alone, simply because the form of uiaufiuratlon was the same as (or similar to), that used in professing a belief in the fundamental doctrines of the New €hurch, is equivalent to saying that, — because the T "1 NOT A MKIIK lOmiATi ACT. 81)3 ung a New se the raarriagG servico liiul l)eon used in solcinni/ing nuptials, afterwards, when tlie wife died, or when, for tho cause of adultery, the liusbaud i)ut her away, and united liinisolf instead to a virgin daughter of Jerusalem — no nnxrriago service was reijuired on the occjision, the former one heing all snfticient ; or that the new oldi^titions would llow into the former ceremony, and till it. Thus, to say that he has already been hapizcd, is just as pertinent as to say he has aln^ady been married ! Still, that there is virtue in that original act of baptism cannot be doubted. It is not only a means of conjunction with that sect or society in the re- ligious world on earth which is in tlie same faith as was professed in uniting with it ; but, as thought brings presence, so also it is a sign which is per- ceived in the spiritual uorld, and ])rings the person thus initiated into conjunction there also with those who are of a similar faith, or into association with *' such spirits as make one with their life and faith" (T.C.H. ()77). But the only reason why baptism represents rcrjcnc ration, is because it acknowledges the Lord and His connnandments, or laws of life, by which alone regeneration can be effected ; and unless rej:eneration can as well be effected by an idolatrous object of worship, and by faith alone, as by the true God as our Saviour and lledeemer, it must be obvious that baptism into such a faith is not the means for accomplishing it. Nay, it is not only incflicient to this end, but it must be actually injurious in its inlluence on a genuine receiver of the New-Church doctrines, because it becomes to him a door of influx for the infestation of falses. ■am 3G1 KEV. II. DK CIIAIIMS KXrKUIENCi:. A striking, though it inay ho soinowhat extreme view of this is given hv Mr. Do Charms in his o\Tn experience, he having heen ])aptiz(!(l into tlio faith of a tri-personal (iod; so that long after liis recep- tion of the J)octrines of the New Jerusalem, the spirits in the; world of spirits, who had then heen associated with him, continued to flow into his thought, and excite in him the ideas of that faith. "Such (he says), were the horrifying injections of those spirits into our mind, when we attempted to address our prayers to the Lord, as the only God, that we would oftentimes spring up involuntarily and spasmodically from our knees, in veriest terror of them ! In short such were the infestations of our new faith hy those spirits, such their tempta- tions of us, hy the suggestion of harrowing douhts respecting its heavenly verities, that we were thrice driven to the utmost verge of despair." And this went on accumulating, he says, until ho was bap- tized into the faith of the New Church ; when, he continues, "the sign of our old baptism seemed to be wiped from our spirits, or to be veiled from the view of other spirits, by the superinduction of ihe new sign : for, ever since that time, we have never known what it is to f^'el the slightest doubt in re- gard to any truth of the New Church, much less its fundamental one, nor have we suffered any of our previous infestations from Old-Church spirits." That experience, he says, and the profound study of the subject for a period of thirty years, " brought us to our present very clear convictions and most decided advocacy of the necessity of a new and ^^^If FROM THE OLD TO THE NEW. 3G5 treme 3 o\Tn faith rccep- 1, the 11 been ito his , faith. ions of [)ted to y God, intarily it terror iions of tempta- doubts ■e thrice nd this as bap- hen, he mod to om the 1 of ihe never in re- [ich less any of pirits." id study brought d most ew and •distinctive baptism of tlio New Jerusalem." (Ext. Church, p. 7*2). Indeed, instead of the baptism into a false faith and idohitrous worship, admitting any one within the walls of the Now .h'rusalcm, it only removes liim so much furtbcr from them ; and it is rt'allv wonderful tluit anv profi'sscd receiver of the doctrines of tlu* New Clmrcli should not see this, or that he should think the mere formula of l)aptism was the all of baptism. Why, thos^ sim- ple, naturally-minded men, wIkj were baptized by John in the Jordan, with all the jiroper fornia of baptism, before the Lord in his Humanity was made known to them, n-evc (Kjain haptized by Paul, ■when th(!V received this faith, into the name of the Lord Jesus ; and then the IIol}' S[)irit was given to them : for this can only be received by those who acknowledge Him in his glorilied Humanity (Acts XIX 5). To recognize a baptism into the faith of the Old Church as valid, is virtually to admit the New Church to be a sect and constituent part thereof, instead of being a New and distinct dis- pensation, in which all things are to be made new; i.e., new doctrines and new rituals, new wine and new bottles, a new fig-tree and new organic body. What then have we to do with the old ? Or, what right have we to commingle it with the new ? Is it mir church that we may do as we please with it ? Is the Eucharist our feast, that we may invite whom we choose ? Is it not the Lord's Church and the Lord's table ? and what have we to do but to obey His teachings ? Or have we any right to set aside His divine order, or to invite anv one who IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) V // .// :/ c^- '7^., 1.0 I.I IM ilM 13.2 IM 2.0 1.8 1.25 u 16 ^ 6" » v^ <^ /^ '(^1 c- VI ^# % ■r# •■> % o ^\ /A ''^f 7 Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, NY. 14580 (716) 872-4503 •^ <? i^- 36G NOVITIATES TO OBEY. has not thus acknowledged Tlim ? If baptism is the outer door, and that tabic is the inner door, of His church, and the officiating priest (who is His ministering servant), there and then invites in the name of the Lord, those who are to approach it, have we any right to invite anyone in any other way, than by that baptismal door where the Lord is first acknowledged and professed? Or by what authority can any one assume to set aside a condi- tion which the Lord himself has enjoined ? Has a Minister of the church any such right *? or liave any number of men the ability to bestow it ? It was not singular, fifty years ago, when the New Church was just coming into form and visibility in the world, that, in its then transition state, there should for a whih^ have been some admixture of the old with the new. But is this state always to con- tinue? or has not the New Church assumed a separ- ate and distinct organization long enough yet, to see and admit that neither Ordination, Baptism, or the Eucharist, in the Old Church, are, or can be, any constituent parts of the New. But do you say, " Yes, ire see and admit this all as true and proper for us, but not for others ; and, if there are any who do not see it as we do, we have no right to require it of them?" But, in saying this, what do you do, but virtually invite those, who are so disposed, to climb over the wall ? The Minister who invites to the Supper, has no prerogatives beyond what the Lord has taught and commanded him. It is neither oiii' table nor our feast, for us to do as we please ; but it is the Lord's AND NOT TO DICTATE. 867 Church and the Lord's table, and he has Himself made the requirements ; and we have no more the privilege to set them aside, than we have to dis- pense with the Decalogue, or to grant indulgences. A novitiate receiver may not know this ; but we know it, or ought to know it, and we should so in- struct him. Th(! walls of the church are for its pro- tection and defence, the doors for admission ; and so long as ]]aptism is tluit door, and the essential of baptism is the acknowledgment of the Lord in His Divine Humanity, and the signing and sealing of that testimony is by water and the spirit, we have only to obey ; and those who cannot do this, or are unwilling to enter this outer door, ought not to enter the inner, but should wait till they can ; and if thev are in earnest, and in the real affection for truth they will not have to wait long. But if any yet refuse to come in this Divinely appointed way, and still complain of being excluded from the benefits of this sacrament, they must be most un- reasonable and inconsistent indeed : because this table is open to them in every sect of the Old Church, into the faith of which they have been baptised ; and if they are so well satisfied with that baptism, how can they be otherwise than equally well satisfied with that communion ? It may be, indeed, that you can cite me cases, in which Ministers of the New Church will recwve, or even invite others to come, who have never been thus baptised into the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, but who, ins^tead of coming in by Ilim alone as the door, have acknowledged a tripersonal God. '^•--. 868 THE CASE OF SWEDENBORO. But would you cite such cases? Especially are you willing to sanction it m our Association ? It may be said that Swedenborg received the sacrament of the Supper before his death, without having been baptised into the faith of the New Church. But, at that time there was no organized New Church on earth, or any New Church Minister; conse- quently no possibility of being thus baptised. Nor did Swedenborg desire thus to receive the Supper. He said "the otfer was well meant ; l)ut that being a member of the other world lie did not need it." Still he consented to take it, but arranged the form and manner himself, the attending minister only consecrating the elements ; and this "to show the connection between the church in heaven and the church on earth." But you will also remember that as Swedenborg had not been baptized by a minister of the New Church, so neither did he re- ceive the Holy Supper at the hands of one, because the time had not yet come. Thus this case is not at all in illustration. Nor can any authority be adduced for receiving the Holy Supper, in the New Jerusalem, until the candidate has entered her sacred portals as the Lord has taught and required. And they shall be blessed who thus come, because they do his commandments ; and then they shall have a right to the tree of life in the midst of the city, and to eat thereof, and live forever, because they thus " enter in through the gates." May the Lord in His mercy help you to see this subject in in its true light and aid you by his wisdom, to do His will ! Amen. • are you It may ament of ing been ill. But, f Churcli r ; cons e- jed. Nor ; Supper, hat being need it." [ the form ister only show the a and the remember ized by a lid he re- le, because ;ase is not Lthority be .n the New itered her d required, le, because they shall idst of the jr, because ' May the subject in dora, to do The work roferrod to as embodying the Course of Lectures so often referred to in these pages on tl,e Cukation ok thk Univkrse, etc., entitled, The TiVB Great Booh of Nadife aod hMm of the roSMOS AND THE L()(;()S: Being a History of tlie origfn and progression of the Universe, from cause to effect ; more particularly of Tlie EARTH and the' SOLATl SYSTEM .-the n,o.J,. oprnuuN of the creation of ^EOKTABLKs, Animals Axn Man ; and h.nv they are tvpes and symbols by which the Creator wrote the LOCJOS. Illustrated by the first chapters of Genesis. .^00 pages. May he had of the author (Detroit, Mich.) at the reduced price of Si..-.,),, or of E. H. Ssvinnoy, 20 Cooper Union, New Yoik. ALSO The difference between SHEOL, HADKS. and (iKHENNA- and the meaning of the word INFE K NUH ; by the same author.' May be had as above, prices 1,1 cents.