IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) /. MJ.. .sr A^ ;^> .C^-f y 1.0 I.I ■ 5 '""^== M 20 1.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 ^ 6" - ► Photographic Sciences Corporation s. 4? V -U^7 / i THE PAPACY. BY rUOFEBgOR KINO. The title of this Lecture, which has been stated, not by myself, but by those who drew out the plan of this course, may be viewed in two ditFerent aspects. It may be taken as a proposition with the affirmative word understood ; and which, when fully expressed, would constitute this assertion, — " The Papacy is a conspiracy against civil and religious liberty." Taken in this sense, it would be required that we should lay the subject before you as persons who deny, or who at least may not be prepared to admit the truth of the proposition ; and the object would be tj establish it by proofs. The other aspect in which the title may be viewed is that in which, according to the plain and simple meaning of the words in which it is expressed, no affirmation is made, but a subject simply is proposed,— " The Papacy— a conspiracy against civil and religious liberty." It takes it for granted that the Papacy is such a conspiracy, and it wishes you to look at it in this character. Addressing myself, as I understand I am row doing, to Protestants, I shall so far respect the profes- sion under which you appear htre as to take it for grant- ed that you have a general understanding of the meaning of that Protest on the ground of which, as adhering to its principles, we are called Protestants. I will not enter upon a formal proof, to which justice could not be done within the compass of a single Lecture. But, in inviting you to look at the object that is thus described, I will endeavour so to pre- tl sent ,t, as tliat no intelligent and impartial listener can fail to Ik. n„,,™,,ed with the eonvi.'ion that, deny it who may, the F1«I system „ ,ho most stupendous conspiracy ever fonned ag-a.ast e.vd and religious liberty. In s making of it how- ever, as a conspiracy, I a™ not to be held a., ascribing either the ammus or the conduct of conspirators to all the member., of that system.^ As ,s generally the e. ,e in conspiracies, many •nay be assocmted with the band who may be alto..othc:r unconscious of the treasonable nature of the plot, man^ ,„ay he employed as instruments to help it on who are little aware of the u.se that ,s made of them. But whatever may be the MOWS of >ndmdual>*-amid the changes which in the'lapse of ages may take place in the agents-notwithstanding the change of tacfcs wh,ch mayat tin,es have been adopted-allowing for all the vancty of motives, some good and some bad, b^ wluch mdmdual actors may have been influenced, compirjn IS the appropnato term to be employed, in .speaking ff thai eeclesmstico-pontical association, the Church of Rome with the Pope at its head in all his assumed infallibility and Lupre- nmcy. All is dii-ected, and is made to conspire towards the accompl,.shment of his own ends, by that spirit spoken of in senpture, as the oM serj^nt, and as the great red dragon with .even heads and ten horns, which has its central seat in the seven hdled city, and which exercises ts power, and directs the move- ments of Its varied in.struments to secure this, " That as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed- and that no one might buyer sell, save he that had the mark' orthe name of the beast, or thenumber of hisname." Eev' xin. 15, 17. 1. Let us, in the first place, then, look at some of those pecuhar prmcples of the Papal Church which go to establish and Illustrate her character as a conspiracy against civil and religious hberty. On this part of our subject, wo perhap., «annot begm more appropriately than with the Creed of Pope Pius IV. ; ill wliich he sums up the faitli of the Romisli (Jimrch, as it had boen, a few years before ho promulgated his Bull, declared at the Council of Trent. It is of course writ- ten in Latin, but the following is a correct translation of it : "1. I most steadfastly admit and embrace the apost^tlical and ecclesiastical traditions, and the rest of the observations and constitutions of the same Church. "2. I also admit (or receive) the Holy Scriptures according to that sense which the Holy Mother Church, (to wliom it belongs to judge of the true sense,) hath held, and doth hold ; nor will I ever understand and interpret it other- wise than according to the unanimous consent of the Fathers. ** 3. I profess, also, that there are truly and properly Seven Sacraments of the New Law instituted by Jesus Christ, our Lord, and necessary to the salvation of mankind, though not all of them necessary to every man, viz : Baptism, Con- firmation, the Eucharist, Penance, Extreme Unction, Orders, and Matrimony, and that they confer grace ; and that of these. Baptism, Confirmation, and Orders, cannot be re- peated without sacrilege. "4. I likewise receive and admit all the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, in the solemn admin- istration of all the above-said Sacraments. " 5. All and everything which was defined and declared about original sin by the most holy Council of Trent, I embrace and receive. " G. I profess, likewise, that in the Mass is offered to God a true, proper, and propitiatory Sacrifice, for the quick and the dead ; and that in the most holy Sacrament of the Eucharist there is trrdy, really, and substantially, the body and blood, together with the soul and divinity, of our Lord Jesus Christ; and that there is a conversion made of the -whole substance of bread into his 1 idy, which conversion the Catholic Church calls Transubstantiatian. "7. I confess, also that under either kind (or species) only, whole and entire Christ, and the true Sacrament, is received. "8. I steadfastly bold that there is a Purgatory, and that the souls there detained aro helped by the suffrages of the faithful. If « *;0. Ah, also, that tlio Saints who roi> toffother with thriHt, are to l>e voneratod and iuvocatod ; and thS thoy offer prayers to God for u. ; and that their reliques are to bo venerated. ^ w «« Ji ]?' iJ\x^^^' ?"?;* ?""^^ ""^^^'^ *'^»* t*»« ima^e of Christ, and t}ie Mothc^r of God, the always Virgin, as also oZv Samts are to be had a,ul rtWd, aiuT due honor and veneration to be bestowed upon thorn. iJ' i^' J ^f'y'\^^^A}^''\ ^'^ F^^r ^ iadulgonces was left by Chns ,nh.s Church, and that tl».ir uTe is most wholewme to Christian people. T^arlfn r J «f "^^^'Jg^ J»^« H^lj OatlUic and Apostolic Koman Church to be tlie Mother and Mistress of all Churches «nd I promise and swear true obedience to the Bishop of ^^rr^^- '"'-'^ '''' ^^^-'^ ^ ^^«^^- -1 "la. All fhc rest also, delivered, dofined and declared bv the sacred canons and accumenical Councils, especially by the doub.. And likewise, all things contrary, ainl whatsoever heresies, condemned, rejcn^ted, and anutlfematized, by tile Church, L m hke manner, condemn, reject, and anathematize. -This true CatlM)lic faith, without which no man can be saved, which at present I freely i>rofess and truly hold I will rnost constantly retain and confess entire and inviolable (by God s help) to my last breath ; and take care, as much as leth m me that it bo held, taught, and pi-oacM, by my ^ubjeots, or those whose eare belongs to me as my office ^h^e^y^S;.^"' ^"^ ^"^"- '^ ''^'^' - ^^' -^ According to the Bull of Pope Pius IV, every ecclesiastic, of whateypr grade, is to receive nnd swear to this creed and solemnly to profess his obedience to the Roman Church in this form, and no other, under the penalty of the curse of the Councd of Trer^t. He concludes the Bull in words to this eftect : - To no n^an on earth is it permitted to infringe this expression of our >yill and mandate, or Fesumptuously to gainsay it. If any ope shall preen.me to attempt it, let him i>».. :.» be received simply, without qualification, and as foundation principles ; the latter are to be received only acooi'ding to that sense which the Holy Mother Church hath held, and doth hold ; nor are they «>ver to be understood and interpreted otherwise than according to the unanimous consent of the Fathers. The last clause may be considered as excluding the Scriptures altogether from any attempt at interpretation, for it will try the research of the most learned priest in the ilomish Church, to produce an interpretat'on of a single chapter in the Bible, in support of which he can plead the unanimous consent of the Fathers. Not even the standard text. Matt, xvi. 18 — •' Thou art Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church," can boast of an interpretation iu which the Fathers are unanunous. According tx) Hilary, Gregory of Nyssa, Am- brose, Chrysostom and others, the " rock " means (he truth which Peter had just acknowledged — the fundamental aiticlc of the Christian faith — "Thou art the Chri.t, the 8 «od, m his Word, speaks directly to min „ w creature, and as a sinner- and t.n. r T , * """' be saved. •■ WisdoJ: ^^ J til"^^'. hT' "^ the way in the plaees of the pat s ; 1 'eriil t t^'t ' at the entry of the citv nf ihn • ^^'"^ ^ates, I.er proelaition T^'^^^'^f ^ f ^^ •-' »<» voice is to the sons of man " J ■ . • ' """^ ""' apHnted to expound tZ' trnt 1 7;.! T*'':^^ '"'" to press them upon the conscience bl 7 ™'"'' ""' the ministry must be minister: he tlf^t: ,","''""' under the Old Testament wa. ■ To tht , J''^ ""f "'"'r' testimony : if thev s-,eak not 1 ,• , ^ ""'' »" "'« cause the're is no li!l t ,1""'"^ '^ *'« ^"-'- '*- '- the charge is giventot libers ofl C^T "T''^'"" New Testament : •• Beloved, bl^ L te'^ r^ ^ ^ the spirits whether they are of Gn that it renders theni Mvbfect to the Churchy whence she justly seizes theqi as deserters from her caiiip ; aud accordingly Dens tells us : * '* Heretics, Schismatics, Apostates, and all sunilar persons, who have been baptized, are Iwund by the laws of the Church whicii concern them, nor are they uKire released from her laws than subjects rebellmg against tJieir lawful Prince are released from th<3 laws of that Prince." " They remain personally subject to the Chureli wheresoever they iiiay he." Having proposed the (j[uestion, Wliat are the punishments decreed against tljiose infected with the stain of Heresy? Peter Dens giyes the following answer : t " Heretics that are kiio^n to be such are infamous from this very cause, and ai-e deprived of burial connected with the rites of the Church, f heir temporal goods are for this very cause confiscated ; '* j " Finally, they are also justly visited with other punish- ments, even such as are corporal — as banishment, imprison- ment, &c." Nor does he leave us in doubt as to what may be coniprehended under this ** &c." The question is distinctly proposed, Are heretics justly punished with death ? and the answer is ready, — % " St. Thomas answers, Yes — because forgei-s of money or other disturbers of the State, are justly punished with death, therefore, also, heretics, who are forgers of the faith, and, as experence testifies generally, disturb the State. This is confirmed, because God, in the Old Testament, ordered the false prc»phet to be slain ; and in Deut. xvii. 12, it is decreed that if any one will act proudly and will not obey the commands of the Priests, let him be put to death. See, also the eighteenth chapter. The same is proved from the condemnation of the 14th article of John Huss, in the Council of Constance." We have sh«wn how much they are opposed to the reading of even their own approved version of the Bible without their o Den« ii. 289. 2 t Dens, il. 88. : Ibid, ii. 89. 14 If own explanatory notes. Hero, then, is a note, which, in the fourth edition of the Douay Bible, published in Dublin in 1816, was appended to the passage just referred to in Deuteronomy : " Here we see what authority God was pleased to give to the Church guides of the Old Testament, in deciding without appeal all controversies relating to tho law, promising that they should not err therein : and punish- ing with death such as proudly refuse to obey their decision ; and surely he has not done less for the Church guides of the New Testament. ^^ But the theory of the Papacy is not exhausted when we spoak of the Pope as being the Head of the Church, and the proper depositary of all the power which is claimed for it. The Pope, as the representative and Vicar of Christ, who is not only Head of the Church, but is the head over all things to his Church, claims a supremacy in temporal things also ; he claims to have a right, when he may see it expedient, to interfere in all temporal matters, and even to dispo.se of crowns and of kingdoms. The Papacy is bot;Ji spiritual and secular. *' It is," as it has been well expressed,* " a tyranny which fetters humanity in its religious, its social, and its political elements.'' The claim to political supremacy, potwithstanding disclaimers by certain Koman writers, who have their own present objects to serve, has been ostentatiously urged and formally declared by the Bishop of Rome, as resting upon divine right, and as necessarily included in his ecclesiastical office. The full amount of the claim was not stated all at once. Wliat had only been, as it were, in the germ at an early period, was propounded with great boldness by Gregory VII., towards the close of the eleventh century; so that in his day the supremacy of the Pope over the Church, and the Church over the State, assumed the shape of a *' Europe's Crisis, by the Rev, James Wright: a valuable work, and very .flcasonublo. 15 perfectly organized system. In his quarrel with Henry IV., the Emperor of Germany, he asserted his supremacy to such an extent that he excommunicated the Emperor, absolved his subjects from their oath of allegiance, and forbid any one to fierve him as King ; nor was the excommunication removed till Henry had made the most abject submission to him at the Castle of Canosa. Innocent III., in the thirteenth century, asserted the same principle towards John, the King of England, whom he brought to submission by first laying his Kingdom under an interdict, then actually deposing him from his throne, and making his kingdom over to the King of France. At a later period, that is, at the beginning of the fourteenth century, the principle on which this claim was founded was thus set forth by Boniface VIII., in his Bull, Unam Sanctam :* " There is one fold, and one shepherd. The authority of that shepherd includes the two swords, — the spiritual and the temporal. So much are we taught by the words of the Evangelist, * Behold here are two swords,* namely, in the Church. The Lord did not reply, * It is too much,' but ' It is enough.' tJertainly he did not deny to Peter the temporal sword : he only commanded him to return it into his scabbard. Both, therefore, belong to the jurisdic- tion of the Church — the spiritual sword and the secular. The one is to be wielded for the Church, the other by the Church, — the one is the sword of the Priest, the other is in the hand of the Monarch, but at the command and sufferance of the Priest. Ic behoves the one sword to be under the other — the temporal authority to be subject to the spiritual power." " Moreover, we say, determine and pronounce, that every human creature is subject to the Roman Pontiff, as of absolute necessity to salvation." Now, this supremacy must not be identified with the temporal dominion which belongs to the Pope, as sovereign » Gleseler's Ecclesiastical History, iii. 146 ; also, Wylie'8 Prize Essay on the Papacy— p. 08. .It 16 of what «r«f balled the States of the Church, in Italy. Hi» temporal authority as a petty sovereign is indeed one of the features hy which wo are enatlet? to identity Jiini, hs he i» described in the Bibte, and it is iBipoi-tant, as en«biing- «* to understand, when we look at the «;ondition in which his own immediate subjects are held, 1k»w hostile Popery is, where it has full sway, to liberty whether civil or religions. But the supremacy of which we speak belongs to the Pope, and 1» claimed by him, not as a p judge all perstins in all spiritual causes, by calling them t*> his cognizance, oi* delegat- ing judges for tliem witli a final and peremptory sentence ; to receive apjieals from all e< closiastitjal judicato-les and to reverse their j«idgnients, if he find cause ; to be himself un- accountable for any of hi^ iniugs, exempt from judgment, and liable to no repnHif; to erect, transfer, abolish episcopal sees ; t*) exact o'j,t}is of fealty and obedience from the clergy ; to found religious ordei-s, or to raise a spiritual militia for pnipagatioji and defence of the Church ; to yununon and coram issionate, soldiers by croisade, &c., to figlii agamsi Infir dels, ;vijd i/) perseciite infidels." No>v, wliile in claims »*uch as these, we see Popery )n a light tUat corresponds most acdu-ately with the deserii^tion which the Wo.u oi;' xrad. gives of tbe man o" sin, as one ' who opposeth arl exaltetli hunseli' above al' diao is called Lrod, or thai, is vorshipi>«d ; .>o that he ai* Uo«l sitteth m tJie teuip*'^ of God, showing himself tlial he \s God ;" we see, also, what koid of agents iljese men may \m in 'tarrying t)nt their oitjects. Au'ong tlie royjilties lere asi^ertei' Tor the Pope, is xH^PoWttU OF VOIDING PHOMISt'S, VoWS, OAiHS, OBUOATJOvS TO I.AW, iJY ms nisKENSATidiMS. It ie possib'e thai, you uay iiave heard it denied Ly Roman OaihuUcs that any sutli power Is t'.'old to Iselong to the Pop. In the case Oi' the Papacy, which claims infallibility, -m^ e^tj.-equently "mDnitability . evei. ancient writings, which testify abundantly to the fact of tlie ciaiw, might be aufficient to establish the point. I shall give you. ii II 22 however, a late authority : Alphonso Liguori was a living author about seventy or seventy-two years ago, and he was raised to the rank of a Saint about twenty years ago.^ In 1803 the sacred congregation of rites declared " that in all the writings of Alphonso Liguori, edited and inedited, there was not a word that could justly be found fault with." In 1831 the sacred congregation still further answers in the nega- tive to this question, ** Is there any occasion for inquietude in the confessor who, in th- sacred tribunal of penance, practically follows all the opinions of Blessed Alphonso Liguori, upon this sole ground, that the Holy Apostolic See hath declared that not a word in all his works can justly be found fault with?" His opinions, therefore, may be safely acted on. Yet this Liguori tells, in book 4, No. 256, "That the power of dispensing belongs to all prelates who have jurisdiction in forn externo, or the privilege of it from the Pope. Hence, the following persons can grant dispensations : 1. The Pope, to all the faithful, from all vows whatsoever. 2. Bishops, to their own subjects. 3. Exempted Superiors of religious houses to their own religious and novices." In book 1, No. 189, he says, " It is certain that the Pope and his prelates can dispense with vows, since herein they hold the place of God." And in book 6, No. 1119, he says, " It is asked if the Pope can ever dispense in things which are established by God, of jus divinum ? In these things in which the jus divinum has its origin in human will, as in vows and oaths, it is certain with all that the Pope has the faculty of dispensing with them." He adds, still further, " In those things which are absolutely ywrerf/y mo, [such as the law of nature itself.] Sanchez, and many others, say, with great probability, that the Pope has the power, in tmy particular case, not indeed of dispensing with then\ but of declaring that the divine law NO LONGER BINDS." You must obscrvo that according to Jesuitical morality, which Liguori understood well, a person '4\ 23 is quite safe in acting upon an opinion which, as being main- tained by some eminent doctor, is probably right, even though he himself should not concur with the doctor in his opinion. The teaching here, therefore, amounts to this, that where the Pope grants tlio dispensation, what in other circumstances would be one of the greatest sins against nature is no sin at all. Sin you know is the transgression of the law, but here no law has been violated. In the case supposed, its action has been suspended, it ceased to impose an obligation. And is not he who impiously pretends to this power justly described as one who sets himself above all that is called Grod ? And are not men who can embrace principles such as these, wonclrously adapted for working out the scheme of the mystery of iniquity ? But besides the secular clergy the cause of the Papacy is maintained and promoted by whole hosts of what are called reoTilar clergy, that is, the various orders of monks and friars who are bound by the three grand rules of poverty, chastity, and obedience. While we have no doubt that their profes- sions of a rigid observance of the first and second rules help to secure for them considerable influence with the people, we have as little doubt that their training under the authority of the third rule, by which their wills are subdued, and they are brought to unreserved obedience to their ecclesiastical supe- riors, renders them very fit instruments in carrying out the objects of this conspiracy. The Dominicans particularly have signalized their devotion to the cause, by their eagerness in hunting out heretics, by the cruelties which they ha,ve practised upon them when in their power, and by the zeal which they have manifcbLcd in perpetrating the deeds of the Inquisition. Even they, however, must yield the palm to the followers of Ignatius Loyola. It was in 1534 that that fanatic founded the order of the Jesuits, but it was not till six years thereafter that they were 24 established, by the Bull of Paul III. In addition to the three usual oaths of poverty, chastity, and oljedieiice ; they take an oatli of special obedience to the Pope. Amid all his subjects, they are }>ecuiiarly his devoted vas&als, and are bf»th bound and trained tc» the most anreasoning obedience. Seyrnour, in his " Tuomings with the Jesuits at Home," p. 17, tells as thai :j,i accomplished member of that order stated to him, " that the <»Teat and cardinal principle was, that obedienhje was the greatest Ohristiaii duty, and humility the highest Christian virtue, and that this principle was the grand eleutent ov their (KJwer. He showed how in their early schooling they ti-ained the mind to the m(>8i strict and rigid obedienee, binding everything so as to impart the principle of obedience, and create the hibit of obedience : and in the end, admission to the Order is securea only through the vows of the most implicit and unquestioning obedience. "When admitted into the Order there is no right t« judge or question, to demur or hesitate, as to any command that may be issued by the General and Council of the Order ; the duty of every member being to render, in all humility, a simple and unhesitating obedience.*' As ic any objection that commands might be given in opposition to his judgment, revolting to his feelings, and wholly hostile to his deliberately formed opinions, his answer was, (p. 33,) "That it argued greater humility, modesty, and self-denial to render obedience under such circumstances, and therefore such obedience was held to'^be more meritorious in the sight of God. He stated that if such a command was issued to him, he would feel it his undoubted duty to forego his own judgment, to neglect his own feelings, to abandon his o^vn family, to renounce the interests of his country, and to give an implicit and unquestioning obedi? ence ; that such self-denial was meritorious, and that be felt the amount of merit accruing to him, would be great ii^ proportion to the pain and difficulty he experienced, in so jMP' 25 umbling himself as to render such obedience to the desires of the Order." Now, we ask, what can be expected from the successful operation ef such men but the extinction of Christian morality, and the fastening down of society, in all its relations, in the chains of the most absolute despotism ? These most earnest and devoted men are so very virtuous, forsooth, that they will never trouble themselves to exercise then: own mind m inquiring whether what they are ordered to do is a thing which, in itself, is right or wrong. The more merit to them if it is something abhorrent to nature. They hav.3 such a strong sense of duty, that they can think of nothing but obedience to the orders of their superiors. When they set out to fulfil these orders, they do not need to be very scrupulous as to the means ; the same worthy Saint Liguori (book 4, No. 151) instructing them m this wise : " It is certain, and commonly held by all, that it is lawful to use equivocation, and to confirm it with an oath. The reason is, that we do ieceivb our neighbor ; but for some good reason suffer Mm to he deceived, and are not obliged to speak to his understanding, if *here be just cause : such cause being af- forded by any honest purpose to preserve good things useful for the soul or lody. ' * Book 4, No. 1 53 : * * A confessor may affirm, even upon oath, that he has no knowledge of a sin which he has heard of in confession — meaning, as a man^ not as a minister of Christ. The reason is, the interrogator has no right to know ought but communicable knowledge, and that obtained in confession is not such." In like manner, book 4, No. 147, " A penitent when asked by a confessor about a sin that that has been already confessed, may swear that he did not commit it ; meaning, in his own mind, that which he has not confessed." Book 4, 154: ** A criminal or a witness interrogated not legitimately by a judge, [and the church teaches that, although her members may submit to circum- 3 Ill m \\ * 26 stances no iudgc can a«t legitimately who does not hold his Sy L unL the supremacy of the Pope] may swear that Snows nothing of the orune though he does know it, mean- ".Zh^lcnJsno crime, of which, in the oircumtances^ he Iti— . --W r; or that "he<^es no W ,•( so as to give evidence about it." Book 4 No. 201 . U lU one intends indeed to promise, yet not te bmd hunseHby 21 Z2., his vow is null and void." These n^strucbons t™e tl explain the difficully of getting e^denee from ::L parties I crmunal .rials. In expounomg wh=^ ^ aEomlist, he calls the fifth, butwkch .s '«»lly *« «'^^ Lmmandment of the moral law, the same P« ^am^ LteToiidoclaies, (book:*. No. 364,) "that they only are to be STted assa^inswhocommitahomicideonthosupubuon It he who employs them shall P^y them a temporal reward_ The significant remark of Pascal tho Yom-ger upon tbs is, that " fpriest's blessmg. or the promise of heaven would not te a temporal consideration." Once more, book *. No. 381. .. Although on accomit of any insult, ^^ ^^^''^V^^'J J^^^ «^. .hould sfy te a gentleman. You lie. it >s not l*™^ to Ml another person ; because the affront may be, and nsuaUy ^ ,iped off in another manner ; yet if the aggressor should try Tapply a stick or a blow to a man of honorable rank, and he'snot able otherwise to avert the insult Drnna. Lossms, Hurtado. and twelve others, agree that it is lawtul. ■ Such, then, axe the men who are every where now spread over the world, with the design of brmgmg ite mhabitante into subjection to the Pope. From the time of the institution of the order in 1634. they m^de rapid progress, ai i were to be found everywhere; whUe they seem to have laid them- «,lves out rticularl, to secure for themselves the education Tf the young, and the direction of affaurs in tho courta of Princes Their intri£ues, and the disturbances winch hey created, led their expulsion torn Engle id m 1604 ; from 1 27 Venice, two years later; from Portugal, in 1759; from France, in 17M; from Sicily and Spain, in 1767; although they soon returned again to some of these countries. Even the Popes found that these seemingly devoted adherents were not so much the servants of the individual Pope, as of the Papacy ; and that their real head was the General of the order. ig^Ganganelli, known as Pope Clement XIV, suppress- ed the order m 1773, but his death, supposed to have been from poison, followed soon after. Pope Pius VII restored the order, for Kussia, in 1801, and for all the world in 1814 ; so that again they are the most mfluential element in carrying out the designs of the Papacy. m. Having thus with all postiible brevity noticed, first, the principle, and secondly, the organization of this conspu:acy, let us now, in the thkd place, say a few words as to the fruits. And here we have to remmd you that, as claiming infallibility, the Papacy not only consistently must, but actually does claun immutability ; and that it will not do to tell us, as some not very intelligent Protestants would have us to believe, that Popery is greatly improved from what it once was, and that it^is not by a reference to the sayings and domgs of what are called the dark ages, that we are to learn what it now is. She herself denies the allegation. She sees indeed the expe- diency, and she yields to the necessity, in particuljir cu:cum- stances, of holding some of her claims in abeyance, of relax- ing^some of her restrictions, and, as Peter Dens has mformed us, of allowing to her subjects who live among heretics, indulgences which she does not permit where she has them fully in he. power. But anything of this nature, which may be referred to by her apologists as indications of improvement, i* the mere result of external influences, and of influences which she herself regards as adverse. Yielding to the pres- sure from without, she may draw in her horns for a little, but only to protrude them again when the pressure is removed ; -.1 il 28 and whether the horns be drawn in. or be protruded there Z 1 an important part of her system, and a cl>araet«ns Ser wh is represented as drunk with the blood of the samts^ ieulwas when her call would assemble the u,—d hosts of potentates acknowledging her supremacy « persecute ev ^ to L death the bible-loving Albigenses and Waldenses, nTh south of France, or the adherents to the truA am^ng the valleys of the Alps. Her call is not so authontative now, i h X"rit is not changed. Its unchanged character >s !1 even in Britain and in Ireland, not, indeed, m the bum- : tie persons who read the bible-she dare not attomp ^"a^lbut in burning the bible itself, the P-' P^tto .h oareful at the same time to lift the obnoxious book into the rH tongs, lest he should be i^ected ^U it« Who has not heard of the fires of Smithfield? Who has noUeard of the treacheries and horrors of t^e --a^eof Bartholomew, for which thanksgiving was ff^^^l by order of the Pope t Germany, Ho land, he Netherlands France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, have their tales to te 1 of he Iciti s 'that were practised within *- ^--j^;, ^ *^^ instisation of this Man of Sin. to restram liberty o thought ::^^'^ action m things civil and sacred, and to bind aUm et,.rs of absolute slavery. Jl-/-\;trL' Adriatic, too. will yet disclce the victims who, in the s ence of the nisht, were brought from the dungeons of Venice to Iniate tte mortal sin of loving the Bible. They were placed nTplaS between two boats' On a signal^ the boats were larated by a few strokes of the oar. A plunge was heard 3 tte watL closed over thehereties. Doesnot the present Ite of Madeira, from which Dr. Kalley. a British subject W Mculty in scaping with his life a few years ago. and tmih multitudes of the natives had to become enles, in e of their religious liberty, show the working std of this conspiracy t What does the experience of the Madia 1 I 29 tell, on this subject ? What does the esperienee of the Mortara family tell — deprived of their child on the ground that having been surreptitiously baptized, it has become immutably the subject of the Pope ? What is the testimony from the dungeon of Poerio ? What is the voice from the many dungeons in Naples and in Rome ? K the Papacy is not a conspiracy against civil and religious liberty, will any one try to explain how it is that, everywhere, it is just as Popery triumphs that liberty suffers ? that there is such an utter extinction of it in Naples and in Rome — the head- quarters of Popery ? Or how is it that it is only the Roman Catholics who dwell in lands where the Word of God has free course, and is glorified, who dare to raise their voice in favour of civil and religious liberty ? They may profess to admire it here ; they may use the phrase as a watchword here ; they may assert their claim to it here : and find abundant sympathy. Yes ! from the bottom of our hearts do we wish that they would rise up as one man, and assert tlieir civil and religious liberty. But I have to remind them that that is a blessing which cannot be enjoyed under Popish rule — it is known only where Protestantism prevails. Even France, with all her pretensions, is a stranger to it. Not only are Protestants there, in the administration of the laws by Roman Catholics, deprived of their constitutional rights and liberties ; but, according to late accounts, a distinguished writer, an earnest Roman Catholic, was about to be put on his trial for stining up dissatisfaction among the people, because he had expressed his persuasion that there was liberty, and national progress, and prosperity in Britain, beyond what was enjoyed in France. There is no reason to suppose that the Emperor of the French, at least, has any doubt about the correctness of that opinion : but Popery cannot bear the light. Our conclusion, therefore, is, that if we Protestants, and our Roman Catholic fellow subjects, are to contmue in the enjoyment of civil and MM 30 religious liberty, it is to be. secured, net by placing ourselves under the inflence of the Priests, but by doing what we can to secure, through the blessing of God, that the administration of our public affairs shall be in the hands of men who fear God and hate covetousness — men in whom we have confidence that they will not show contempt of God's Word, by neglecting to secure a due place for it in schools supported by provincial funds for the education of the young; ami who will not, by supporting with the public funds those who teach Popish error, involve us in the guilt of aiding and abetting those who are agents in a conspiracy against civil and religious liberty. ■3^^ I