aS^ ^ / « IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET {MT-3) 1.0 I.I 144 BZ8 ■ 50 l^^" |Z5 22 »? 10 1.8 7 Photographic Sciences Corporation M/, /./ ^.^. y ■^ />V >/ ■% V '•2^- III '-^ III 1.6 .< 6" ► # \ ^ \ \ rv ^J^ ^ .^J^ ;\ 13 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTEtt.N.Y. 14580 (716)873-4503 <. ^4? '%^^ %> ^#. CIHM/ICMH Microfiche Series. CIHIVI/ICIVIH Collection de microfiches. Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microreproductions historiques Technical and Bibliographic Notss/Notas techniques et bibliographiques The Institute has attempted to obtain the best original copy available for filming. Features of this copy which may be bibliographically unique, which may alter any of the images in the reproduction, or which may significantly change the usual rhethod of filming, are checked below. D D n D D D Coloured covers/ Couverture de couieur |~n Covers damaged/ Couverture endommag6e Covers restored and/or laminated/ Couverture restaur6e et/ou pelliculAe r~n Cover title missing/ Le titre de couverture manque Coloured maps/ Cartes giographiques en couieur □ Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ Encre de couieur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noiie) □ Colourfid plates and/or illustrations/ ''I 'lanches et/ou illustrations en couieur Bound with other material/ Reiii avec d'autres documents □ Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion along interior margin/ La re liure serrde peut causer de I'ombre ou de la distorsion le long de la marge intirieure Blank leaves added during restoration may a'^pear within the text. Whenever possible, these have been omitted from filming/ II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouties lors d'uns restauration apparaissent dans le texte, mais, lorsque cela 6tait possibl«, ces pages n'ont pas iti fi!m4es. Additional comments:/ Commentaires suppl4mentaires: L'Institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire qu'il lui a iti possible de se procurer. Les details de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-dtre uniques du point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une modification dans la m^thode normale de filmage sont indiqu6s ci-dessous. □ Coloured pages/ Pages de couieur □ Pages damaged/ Pages endommagies □ Pages restored and/or laminated/ Pages restaurdes et/ou pellicul6es Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ D D Pages dicoior^es, tachet6es ou piqu^es Pages detached/ Pages ddtachdes r~^ Showthrough/ Transparence Quality of prir Qualiti indgale de i'impression Includes supplementary materii Comprend du materiel supplementaire Only edition available/ Seule idition disponible r~n Quality of print varies/ r~n Includes supplementary material/ I I Only edition available/ Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata slips, tissues, etu., have been ref limed to ensure the best possible image/ Les pages totalement ou partiellement obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelur^ etc., ont it6 filmies i nouveau de facon d obtanir la meilleure image possible. T t< T P o fi b t\ si o fl si o Tl si Tl w M dl er be ril re This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ Ce document est film^ au taux de rMuction indiqui ci-dessous. 10X 14X ^^r 22X 26X 30X _L_ J 12X 16X 20X 24X 28X 32X Ills iu difier ine age The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks to the generosity of: Library of the Public Archives of Canada The images appearing here are the best quality possible considering the condition and legibility of the original copy and In Iteeping with the filming contract specifications. Original copies In printed paper covers are filmed beginning with the front cover and ending on the last page with a printed or illustrated impres- sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All other original copies are filmed beginning on the first page with a printed or Illustrated Impres- sion, and ending on the last page vflth a printed or Illustrated Impression. L'exemplaire film* fut reproduit grAce A la gAnArositi de: La bibiiothique des Archives publlques du Canada Las images suivantes ont 6t6 reprodultes avec le plus grand soln, compte tenu de la condition at de la nettetA de rexemplairo film6, et en conformity avec les conditions du contrat de flimage. Les exemplaires orlginaux dont la couverture en papier est imprimde sont fllmAs en commenpant par le premier plat et en termlnant soit par la derniire page qui compoite une emprelnte d'impression ou d'lllustration, soit par le second plat, selon le cas. Tous les autres exemplaires orlginaux sont fllmAs en commen9ant par la premiere page qui comports une emprelnte d'impression ou d'iilustration et en termlnant par Is derniire page qui comporte une telle emprelnte. The last recorded frame on each microfiche shall contain the symbol —*»l! meaning "CON- TINUED"), or the symbol y (meaning "END"), whichever applies. Un des symboles sulvants apparaftra sur la derniire Image de cheque microfiche, selon le cas: ie symbols -^ signifle "A SUiVRE", le symbols V signifle "FIN". Maps, plotes, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely Included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left h^nd corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams Illustrate the method: Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent Atre filmte d des taux de reduction dlff6rents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour Atre reproduit en un seu3 clich6, 11 est fllm6 d partir de Tangle supArieur gauche, de gauche A drolte, et de haut an bas, en prenant ie nombre d'Images nAcessairo. Les diagrammas sulvants illustrent la mAthode. ita luri ] 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 THE ■^Hfc COERESPO^DEICE BETWEEN THE MOST REV. THE METEOPOLITAN AND THE REV. THE RECTOR OF THE PARISH OF MONTREAL. Montreal t PRINTED BY JOH^ LOVELL, ST. NICHOLAS STREET. 1874. m '■m m «l 1 1 "¥ CORRESPONDENCE. Bishop's Court, April 27th, 1874. "$> H5* My dear Baldwin, You will not I think be surprised when I tell you that my connection with the Cathedral is becoming more and more embarrassing, and until some fresh arrangement is made I feel that I cannot attend the service with any degree of comfort, I allude 10 the entire ignoring of my position in what I have always wished to consider as the Cathedral Church of my Diocese. There is some idea of bringing the matter before the Synod ; but before encouraging such a step I feel that it will be better to call our Chapter together, when I could speak more freely and amicably of the grounds of my complaint. I propose therefore to call a meeting in the Chapter House, on Wednesday, May the 20th. I name that day, as I think it will bo more convenient than any other. Yours very faithfully, A. Montreal. May 2nd, 1874. My dear Lord. I received on Thursday evening your letter of the 27th, and most sincerely regret that your Lordship should see any cause in the. present management of the Cathedral to inter- fere with your pleasure in attending, or to lead you to with- draw your friendly sympathies. Before calling the meeting of the Chapter to which you allude, I would take it as a kindness if your Bordtship would freely state in wi'iting that which you consider to bo a reasonable ground of complaint, iti order that, if possible, a speedy and amicable solution of the difficulty maj- be arrived at. With all respect, Your obedient servant. Maurice S. Baldwin. The Most Rev. The Metropolitan. Bishop's Court, May 2nd, 1874. My dear Baldwin, However unwilling I might be to enter into particulars on paper, your request that I should do so is so reasonable that I caiiHot refuse it, and I am sure you Avill prefer that I should frankly tell you what my grievances are respecting the Cathedral. First, however, let me say that there are many little things which have from time to tinie annoyed me, as indi- cative of a wish to exalt the Parochial character of the Church, at the expense of its C^athedral character, and which I cannot mention in writing. But the main points which I complain of are the follow- ing:— 1. That as Bishop of the Diocese I do not enjoy the right of preaching in my own Cathedral, or of introducing a preacher when I desire to do so ; but I am forced to make the proposal subject to a refusal. The inconvenience of this I specially felt two months ago, when, after having preached a sermon on Public Worship 5 ■ which I proposed to continue on n subsequent Sunday, you throw an obstacle iu the way (intentionally or unintention- ally) which made me resolve never a^min to subject myself to a similar objection. I feel that in my own Cathedral this should not have occurred. 2. That inasmuch as the Cathedral is my proper church, and I must needs be specially interested in all its ministra- tions, there has been little or no consideration of my wishes either as to the mode of conducting the services, or as to the introduction of fresh members of the clerical stuff, During the late Dean's incumbency ituas otherwise in both these respects. 3 That my position in the Chancel has, especially of late, been extremely distasteful, owing to the irreverent conduct of certain of the choir, which must be very disturbing to an}' one who wishes to take part in the service. Of this I have more than once complained to yoa, but without the least effect. 4. That I have on several occasions made suggestions for the improvement of the Cathedral worship, but these have been disregarded, and no steps taken to bring them before the proper authorities ; whoreas it would have been but an act of courtesy to have done so. 5. That the position of the Dean and Canons has of late been scarcely recognized, their stalls having been virtually obliterated by the erection of new seats for the Lector and his assistants in a prominent, but totally distinct part of the church, and the capitular stalls having been gradually absorbed by the choir. 6. That for many months past no pains have been taken by the Cathedral clergy for the decent celebration of Divine Service on week days, as was always the case previous to your incumbency, and according to the prevailing custom in all Cathedrals. These arc some of my main complaints, which at your r iquest I have put upon paper ; but there are many things which have combined painfully to convince me that the 6 foelin/^ which now prevails with those who have the man agemont of the Church is to build it up in its Rectorial capacity, but gradually to divert it of its original Cathedral character, ignoring as much as possible the presence and authority of the Bishop. I send you my grievances in the same spirit os that in which you asked for them. Yours very faithfully, A. MONTREAF.. The claims of the Bishop arc as follows : — 1. That, in accordance with the Queen's Patent, the Parish Church, called Christ Church, shall always bo recognized as '• the Cathedral Church of the said Bishop of Montreal." 2. That the Bishop's right either himself to preach in the Cathedral, or occasionally to introduce a stranger, if he shall desire it, on giving due noticeto the Rector, be hereby admitted. 3. That the ordering of the Services in the Cathedral, and the appointment of the clergy thereof, shall bo subject to the api)roval of the Bishop. 4. That, of the Stalls hitherto assigned to the Dean and Canons, a sufficient number shall be appropriated for their exclusive use, and shall be kept distinct from those used by the Choir. 5. That due provision shall be made for Daily Service in the Cathedral, during at least seven months of the year, ac- cording to the custom prevailing heretofore in this Church, as well as in Cathedrals generally. In order to bring matters to an amicable issue, the Bishop has drawn up the above claims, which he feels to be the minimum of what he may fairly require, and to which he conceives that the Rector (having the dignity and well being of the Cathedral at heart, as well as himself) should bo will- ing to assent. The Bishop desires further to state his decided opinion ^ that the present location of the Rector, and his assistants, in a block of stalls, at a distance from the Choir, from the Capi- tular Stalls, and from the Episcopal Throne, is very objec- tionable, as tending to create a distinction between the Paro- chial and Cathedral Clergy, and effectually separating the Choir from the main body of worshippers. Bishop's Court, May 11, 1874. My dear Balixwin, As I leave for Bedford this afternoon, only returning hero to-morrow evening for one n'ght, I must remind you that I have received no answer to my last letter. I am anxious to receive your reply, as I shall bo guided by it as to whether it will be desirable to send out notices for a Chapter meeting on the 20th. As my demands wore as moderate as 1 could make them in justice to myself, I hoped that you would have felt desirous at once to concur in my proposals. Yours very faithfuiij'', A. Montreal, Montreal, May 12th, 1874. My dear Lord. Finding my answer to your last communication may bo delayed a few days further, owing to my anxiety to give it all due consideration, I write in the meantime to explain that which, I grieve to say, has caused your Lordship trouble. You refer to a sermon which you j)roposed to preach, and in the way of which, you say, I intentionally, or unintentionally, threw an obstacle. Now, my Lord, I can only say I acted unintentionally in Hi 8 tho matter; and the furthost idea frcm my mind was that of cither opposing' or Blighting you. Seeing, however, by your Lordwhip'H letter that I really did wound you, I ofter you my most sincere and humble apology, an I have no other wi.sh than to act with all duo courteny and respect. Your obdt. servant, Maurice S. Baldwin. Mv DEAR Baldwin, I willingly accept j'our explanation about the sei'mon, und believe that you did nut intentionaUy prevent my preaching it. Ah some of our Canons live at a di.stanco, and will require a few days' notice in the event of a meeting on tho 20th, I hoi)e that you will let me hear from you at Lachine on Saturday. Yours faithfully, A. Montreal. Bishop's Court, May 13, 1874. Montreal, May l-4th, 1874. My dear Lord, In answer to a communication received from your Lord- ship on Friday the 8th of May, through the Very Reverend tho Dean, I beg to submit tie following reply: humbly hoping your Lordship will admit the justice of my several conclusions. As tho subjects brought forward by j'our Lordship aro of the gravest importance, I shall consider them seriatim. Claim No. 1. — " That in accordance icith the Queen^s Patent, the Parish Church, called Christ Church, shall be always recog- nized as the Cathedral Church of the said Bishop o/ Montreal." In replj'' to this I may state that not having seen tho Queen's Patent, I cannot affirm more than that I am willing to recognize the legal rights of the Bishop of Montreal in all matters. ii 9 Claim No. 2. — " That the JJinhoji's right, cither hiimctf to preach in the Cathedral, or occanionalfi/ to introduce a sfran' ger, if he shotdd desire, on giving due notice to the Rector, be hereby admitted.'^ I cannot mlmit those cluimH, an thoy intorforo with tho rightH of tho IJoctor of the Parish of Montreal unilor tho Patent. In order, however, to avoid all mistakes in the future, I promiso, as an act of courtesy, to furnish your Lordship, on tho tirst of every month, with a blank form of Lho services t.) bo held in tho Cathedral throuj^hout that period, on which your Lordship ma}- writedown when it will bo your pleasure to preach, which appointments shall be loyally observed. With regard to strangers, while I shall ever be desirous to meet your Lordshi])'s wishes, occasions might arise Avhon I would be compelled to assert my right of objection. Chdm No. 3. — " That the ordering of the services in the Cathedral, and the apjyointment of the Clergij thereof, shall be subject to the approval of the Bishop." As this claim is wholly at variance with the liberty grant- ed to the Rector by il>e Patent, it is inadmissible. Claim No. 4. — " lltat of the Stalls hitherto assigned to the Dean and Canons, a sufficiei^t number shall be appropriated for their exclusive use, and shall be kept distinct from those used by the choir." On all occasions when the Cathedral Chapter maj' be ex- pected at Divine Service, due provision will be made in tho Stalls for their accommodation. Claim No. 5. — " That due jm) vision shaV. /■?, made for daily Service in, the Cathedral, during at least s> en months of the year, according to the custom prevailing heretofore in the Church, as well as in Cathedrals generally." It is my wish and intention to hold daily Service in tho Cathedral as heretofore. Note A. — " The Biship desires further to state his decided opinion that the i>resent location of the Rector and his assistants, in a block of Stalls at a distance from the Choir, from the Cap i I If 10 i ^\ tular tStui '«, and from the Episcopal Throne, is very objection- able, as tending to create a distinction between the Gc*hedral and the Parochial Clergy, and effectually separating the Choir from the main body of the worshippers'' Tho Seats now used by the Rector and his assistants were erected by the Church authorities for the purpose of giving more suitable accommodation, and without any intention of creatinr a distinction between the Cathedral and Parochial Clergy. I would also respectfully disclaim all idea whatever of building up the Church in its Rectorial capacity at the ex- pense of its Cathedral character. Note B. — " That I have on several occasions mide suggestions for the improvement of the Cathedral worship, but these have been -^^ 'regarded, and no steps taken to bring them before the proper authorities, whereas it would hare been but an act of courtesy to have done so." Of the suggestions made by your Lordship as to tho improvement of the Cathedral worshi]), some could only be settled by myself ; others needing the consent of the Church authorities, I found had already been investigated, but, owing to the fact that tho approval of the proprietors of pews was necessary, were considered impracticable. Your Lordship has been pleased to inform me of your intention to convene a meeting of the Dean and Chapter i \ the Cbnpter House of the Cathedral. Now, my Lord, while I do not wi«h to exercise my right of objection to the use of the Cathedral building, your Lord- ship will readily perceive I cannc attend the meeting con- vened for the purposes above specified. With all respqct, Your Lordship's obedient servant, Maurice Scollard Baldwin, Rector of the Parisli of Montreal. To THE Most Rev. the Metropolitan. 11 ,1. Lachine, May 18th, 1874. My dear Canon Baldwin, It grieves me to say that your letter of May the 14th is anything bnt satisfactory to mo. The spirit in which it is written only confirms me in the opinion, which I had already expressed, that your aim seems to be to " build up the Parochial, rather than the Cathedral character of your Church." As regards the first point mentioned, namely the recogni- tion of the Church as " the Cathedral Church of the Bishop," since you seem unwilling to accept the statement without having it verified, I herewith send you a printed copy of the patent, from which you will see that I copied it cor- rectly. As to my preaching in the Cathedral, I cannot consent to do so as a mere matter of courteous permission, though I am persuaded that the courtesy you promise 1 should always have received at your hands. Had you assented to my proposal, I need hardly say that, judging from the past; you might have felt very sure that I should never have undufy pressed my claim, either by desiring to preach ofteuer than I have hitherto done, or ty not cordially consulting you as to your own wishes. During the late incumbency, although your predecessor urged me to "'aim the Pulpit whenever I felt so disposed, you yourself will boar testimony to the fact that I never availed myself of that privilege without first consulting you as to your feelings and convenience. You have further declined to accord to me the privilege of cifering the Cathedral Pulpit to a brother Bishop, or to any other stranger. This being the case, I feel that I cannot ask permission to do so with the contingency of being refused, an event which you yourself contemplate as pos- sible. In the ordering of the services, I desired some consenting voice ; for it is surely an anomaly to regard the Church an "the Cathedral Church of the Bishop," and yet to make 12 h .1 li ii him uii ontire cipher in this respect. And hero again I think you know me well enough to repose a fuller contidenco in me than your objection implies. Also, as to the appointment of tlio Cathedral clergy, can it be right that the Bishop should not even be consulted since the choice of a fit or unfit person would so closely affect him, and since also, from his official position, he has a more intimate knowledge of the clergy than others. I speak feelingly on this point, as I understand that you have recently engaged a clergyman to act as one of the per- manent cathedral ^ia^ without even mentioning his name to me. In the present instance it so happens that I know nothing against his personal character, but rather the reverse. It might, however, have been otherwise. With regard to the Dean and Canons, I must still insist upon their claims to have special scalls allotted to them, as was the case during my predecessor's time, so that they may occupy them whenever they are present at any service, instead of depending upon casual provision being made for them on special occasions. I presume that the present stalls were originally erected with that intent. You Avill bear in mind that I only asked that a certain number of these should be appropriated to them. And now I must close this cori-espondenee, which was en- tered upon because I felt m^'self sorely aggrieved, and be- cause T hoped that you would meet me in a generous and fair spirit — the same spirit that 1 have (as I think you will acknowledge) ever shown towards you. I also conceived that you wou^d have desired to make an equitable adjust- ment of the clai«is both of the Rectory and the Cathedral, and that you would have shown a little more anxiety to place your Bishop in a position becoming his office, instead of rcn- dering him dependent on the courtesy of the Rector. I am very sorry that in these respects our correspondence has failed. Yours very faithfullj^, A. Montreal. ii 13 I regret that you decline to attend the meeting of tho Chapter which I have called. I should not have pressed you to do 80 against your inclination, but I think you will see that you were hardly right^in your refusal.