IMAGE EVALUATION 
 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 
 
 ^0 
 
 
 1.0 J^isfil 
 
 I.I 
 
 1^ 1^ I 
 
 2.5 
 2.2 
 
 lU 
 
 I4£ 12.0 
 
 iiiiim 
 
 L25 iJ^ 11^ 
 
 V] 
 
 0% 
 
 7^ 
 
 
 7. 
 
 
 Photographic 
 
 Sciences 
 
 Corporation 
 
 23 WIST MAIN SmilT 
 
 WnSTH.N.Y. USSO 
 
 (716)I72-4S03 
 
 SJ 
 
 v 
 
 ;V 
 
 ^\ 
 
 4 
 
 
 
 i\ 
 
 '^ 
 

 
 '/. 
 
 \/^0 
 
 ^li. 
 
 "9) 
 
 % 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 
 Microfiche 
 
 Series. 
 
 CIHM/ICMH 
 Collection de 
 microfiches. 
 
 Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions / Institut Canadian de microraproductions historiques 
 
Technical and Bibliographic Notes/Notes techniques et bibliographiques 
 
 The Institute has attempted to obtain the best 
 original copy available for filming. Features of this 
 copy which may be bibliographically unique, 
 which may alter any of the images in the 
 reproduction, or which may significantly change 
 the usual method of filming, are checked below. 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 D 
 
 Coloured covers/ 
 Couverture de couleur 
 
 I I Covers damaged/ 
 
 Couverture endommagde 
 
 Covers restored and/or laminated/ 
 Couverture restaur6e et/ou pellicul6e 
 
 Cover title missing/ 
 Le titre de couve 
 
 I ' Coloured maps/ 
 
 I I Le titre de couverture manque 
 
 Coloured maps/ 
 
 Cartes gdographiques en couleur 
 
 Coloured ink (i.e. other than blue or black)/ 
 Encre de couleur (i.e. autre que bleue ou noire) 
 
 I I Coloured plates and/or illustrations/ 
 
 Planches et/ou illustrations en couleur 
 
 Bound with other material/ 
 Relid avec d'autres documents 
 
 Tight binding may cause shadows or distortion 
 along interior margin/ 
 
 Lareliure serr6e peut causer de I'ombre ou de la 
 distortion le long de la marge intirieure 
 
 Blank leaves added during restoration may 
 appear within the text. Whenever possible, these 
 have been omitted from filming/ 
 II se peut que certaines pages blanches ajouttes 
 lors d'une restauration apparaissent dans le texte. 
 mais, lorsque cela 6tait possible, ces pages n'ont 
 pas 6t6 filmdes. 
 
 Additional comments:/ 
 Commentaires suppl6mentaires; 
 
 L'institut a microfilm^ le meilleur exemplaire 
 qu'il lui a 4t6 possible de se procurer. Les details 
 de cet exemplaire qui sont peut-Atre uniques du 
 point de vue bibliographique, qui peuvent modifier 
 une image reproduite, ou qui peuvent exiger une 
 modification dans la mdthode normale de filmage 
 sont indiquds ci-dessous. 
 
 I I Coloured pages/ 
 
 n 
 
 ^/ 
 
 D 
 
 y 
 
 Pages de couleur 
 
 Pages damaged/ 
 Pages endommagdes 
 
 Pages restored and/or laminated/ 
 Pages restaurdes et/ou pelliculies 
 
 Pages discoloured, stained or foxed/ 
 Pages dicolordes, tachet^es ou piqu6es 
 
 Pages detached/ 
 Pages d6tach6es 
 
 Showthrough/ 
 Transparence 
 
 D 
 
 This item is filmed at the reduction ratio checked below/ 
 
 Ce document est film6 au taux de reduction indiquA ci-dessous. 
 
 I I Quality of print varies/ 
 
 Quality in6gale de I'impression 
 
 Includes supplementary material/ 
 Comprend du materiel suppldmentaire 
 
 Only edition available/ 
 Seule Edition disponible 
 
 Pages wholly or partially obscured by errata 
 slips, tissues, etc., have been refilmed to 
 ensure the best possible image/ 
 Les pages totalement ou partiellement 
 obscurcies par un feuillet d'errata, une pelure, 
 etc., ont 4t6 film6es A nouveau de fa^on A 
 obtenir la meilleure image possible. 
 
 10X 
 
 
 
 
 14X 
 
 
 
 
 18X 
 
 
 
 
 22X 
 
 
 
 
 26X 
 
 
 
 
 Wk 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 s/ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12X 
 
 
 
 
 16X 
 
 
 
 
 20X 
 
 
 
 
 24X 
 
 
 
 
 28X 
 
 
 
 
 32X 
 
 
The copy filmed here has been reproduced thanks 
 to the generosity of: 
 
 University of Windsor 
 
 L'exemplaire film6 fut reprodult grflce A la 
 gdnirositA de: 
 
 University of Windsor 
 
 The images appearing here are the best quality 
 possible considering the condition and legibility 
 of the original copy and in keeping with the 
 filming contract specifications. 
 
 Original copies In printed paper covers are filmed 
 beginning with the front cover and ending on 
 the last page with a printed or Illustrated Impres- 
 sion, or the back cover when appropriate. All 
 other original copies are filmed beginning on the 
 first page with a printed or illustrated Impres- 
 sion, and ending on the last page with a printed 
 or illustrated impression. 
 
 The last recorded frame on each microfiche 
 shall contain the symbol — ^ (meaning "CON- 
 TINUED"), or the symbol y (meaning "END"), 
 whichever applies. 
 
 Les images suivantes ont 6t6 reproduites avec le 
 plus grand soin. compte tenu de la condition et 
 de la nettetd de l'exemplaire film6, et en 
 conformity avec les conditions du contrat de 
 filmage. 
 
 Les exemplalres originaux dont la couverture en 
 papier est imprimie sont fiimds en commenpant 
 par le premier plat et en terminant soit par la 
 dernidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'Impression ou d'illustration, soit par le second 
 plat, salon le cas. Tous les autres exempiaires 
 originaux sont filmis en commenpant par la 
 premidre page qui comporte une empreinte 
 d'Impression ou d'illustration et en terminant par 
 la dernlAre page qui comporte une telle 
 empreinte. 
 
 Un des symboles suivants apparaUra sur la 
 dernidre image de cheque microfiche, seion le 
 cas: le symbole — »- signifie "A SUIVRE", le 
 symbols y signifie "FIN". 
 
 Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at 
 different reduction ratios. Those too large to be 
 entirely included in one exposure are filmed 
 beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to 
 right and top to bottom, as many frames as 
 required. The following diagrams illustrate the 
 method: 
 
 Las cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre 
 fllmte A des taux de rMuction diffirents. 
 Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre 
 reprodult en un seul cliche. 11 est filmi A partir 
 de Tangle supArieur gauche, de gauche d droite. 
 et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre 
 d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants 
 illustrent la mithode. 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 32X 
 
 1 
 
 2 
 
 3 
 
 4 
 
 5 
 
 6 
 
 1:, 
 

 i 
 
 
 
 
 r-./ 
 
 
 • 
 
 
 r 
 
 
 • 
 
 ** 
 • 
 
^ iJ ^ >■■■ 
 
 I CANADA AND ILLINOIS 
 
 .*• 
 
 ^4 
 
 COMPARED! 
 
 BEING AN ANSWER TO CAIRO'S 
 
 SLANDERS ON CANADA. 
 
 BY THE LATE WILLIAM IIUTTOX, ESQ., SECRETARY TO THE 
 BUREAU OF AGRICULTURE. 
 
 S 
 
 i(| 
 
 'I 
 
 •i 
 
 •J 
 
 FIFTH EDITION. 
 
 PRICE, FIVE CENTS. 
 
 ON SALE AT EOWSELL's BOOK STORE, KING ST. EAST, AND AT THE BOOK 
 BTALL AT THE H09SIN HOUSE. 
 
 1862. 
 
 ■1^ ' 
 

 ii I 
 
 |?S.. 
 
 .^s< 
 
To the Editor oj the ''Old Countryman,'^ 
 
 Mr. Editor, — 
 
 Goethe has said, "It is not by attacks on the false, but by the calm 
 exposition of the true, that good is to be done." Taking the above as an 
 excellent rule of action, I have given Mr. Caird's pamphlet, entitled, 
 "Prairie Farming in America," a very attentive perusal; and I think 
 Mr. Caird deserves much credit for the candid way in which he haa 
 treated the subject of the British settlers' prospects in Illinois, in very 
 many points of vital importance. The inferences, however, which may 
 be fairly drawn from the facts and figures he has given us, are in many 
 instances calculated to produce widely different results from those which 
 he appears to have anticipated, and no doubt expects his reader to arrive 
 at. Without dwelling upon the report that Mr. Caird is personally and 
 largely interested in the Illinois Central Railroad Company, and their 
 lands, I proceed to examine the merits of his pamphlet. 
 
 The prevalence of ague, to which Mr. Caird has alluded in pages 11, 
 12, 28, 29, 40, 59, G4, 75, 95 and 9G, New York edition, especially in 
 pages 95 and 96, where he gives the experience of a leading physician 
 of twenty years' practice, cannot fail to be very apalling to intending emi- 
 grants who carefully peruse his work, especially as this physician plainly 
 states that in his opinion " old people ought not to come (to Illinois) at 
 all, as the ague is very fatal to them;" and adds by way of solace, that 
 " Chicago (being an older settlement) was now almost free from ague, 
 that typhus had taken its place in a greatly modified extent, and that 
 pneumonia and rheumatism were the only other diseases that were 
 severe." Candid and explicit as these warnings are, it may be fairly 
 added, that the very great prevalence of ague, and the total prostration 
 with which it is accompanied, often extending oven to weeks and months 
 together on these prairie lands, is not sufficiently portrayed. It not 
 
 1 
 
I 
 
 >n* 
 
 I 
 
 unfrequently happens that whole families are so prostrated, that it is 
 with difficulty any one member of it can be found able to alleviate the 
 sufferings of the rest; and in remote situations it is often extremely diffi- 
 cult to procure aid from other families. The effects of this prostration 
 are often very seriously felt in the delay and even non-performance of 
 the necessary farm-work, the neglect of cattle, and often the partial loss 
 of a season's crops. For this reason, if farmers are determined to settle 
 on prairie land, they should make arrangement for three or four or more 
 families to settle together, and, in charity, Mr. Caird should have sug- 
 gested this ; but it is my purpose to shew that settlers in the bush of 
 Canada have much better prospects in every way than in the prairies of 
 Illinois, not only as regards the comparative freedom from ague, but for 
 acquiring actual prosperity and speedy independence. In endeavouring 
 to show this I will take Mr. Caird's own representations as the basis ; 
 although very great errors have crept into his work, seriously affecting 
 the general character of Canadian soils and Canadian farming. The quo- 
 tation of a few passages will serve to show how hurried must have been 
 his ride through the country, how very erroneous the ideas which he 
 formed. At page 20 he says : " From Prescott to Kingston, and thence 
 to Cobourg, the country is but partially cleared ; very often the train 
 shoots for many miles together through the primeval forest, a path hav- 
 ing been cut in the woods for the railway track, and the felled tiv. a ard 
 branches still lying where thrown on botli sides of the line." This latter 
 assertion may be literally tnie, but Mr. Caird himself, as well as his 
 readers, will be surprised to learn, that at least seven-eighths of this very 
 route is through a remarkably fine agricultural country ; through lands 
 held by the very best and most successful farmers, having very large 
 clearances, comfortable dwellings, and out-houses, and good orchards. 
 The counties from Prescott to Cobourg, through which Mr. Caird's route 
 lay, contain 240,000 inhabitants. For twenty years there have been fine 
 herds of Ayrshire and Durham cattle little inferior to the best cattle in 
 England, and even 40 miles back of the frontier may be seen farms of 
 from 200 to 400 acres, well cultivated, heavy crops, excellent horses, 
 cattle and sheep. The railway track passes through the rear part of their 
 farms, purposely reserved "a primeval forest," for firewood; three- 
 fourths, more probably, of their large farms being under cultivation. 
 The railway company purchased the land in rear because the farmers 
 did not wish their farms to be intersected by railroads, and they sold the 
 land in the rear cheaper than they would have sold any other part of 
 their farms. The quotation above given, shows the great danger of 
 judging a country merely by a railroad ride ; and the danger of publish- 
 ing the impressions thus erroneously acquired, especially by so well 
 known a man as Mr. Caird, is greater still. 
 
 This may be further illustrated by extracts from pages 26, 27, 28, and 
 29 ; and it is certainly much to be regretted that Mr. Caird remained so 
 short a time in Canada, and took such a very cursory glance of the col- 
 
V 
 
 \ 
 
 V 
 
 that it is 
 viate the 
 ely diflS- 
 'ostration 
 Imance of 
 rtial loss 
 to settle 
 jr or more 
 have sug- 
 bush of 
 Irairies of 
 I, but for 
 lavouring 
 le basis; 
 affecting 
 The quo- 
 ave been 
 hich he 
 
 d thence 
 he train 
 
 •ath hay- 
 
 *v.,8 ard 
 
 •is latter 
 
 1 as his 
 
 his very 
 
 ?h lands 
 
 ry large 
 
 rchards. 
 
 's route 
 
 9en fine 
 
 attle in 
 
 rms of 
 
 horses, 
 
 >f their 
 three* 
 
 i^ation. 
 
 irmers 
 
 Id the 
 
 irt of 
 
 er of 
 
 blish. 
 well 
 
 and 
 ed so 
 I coI« 
 
 -^/ 
 
 ony. Many of his rem irks are truthful and valuable, but no individual, tra- 
 velling as Mr. Caird did, could form a correct opinion of the agricultural 
 status and prospects of Canada. At page 26, &c., he says, "the country 
 from Hamilton to Paris is undulating, and seems an easier and more 
 fertile soil ; very little of it is wholly cleared ; certainly more than half 
 is still an unbroken forest, but the trees are immensely tall, and show 
 the rapid growth which only a fertile soil could produce. Though this 
 district is quite within the limit profitable of the culture of Indian Corn, 
 a small proportion only of the land seems to be occupied by that crop. 
 Its great value is every where admitted, but on this description of soil its 
 cultivation demands too much labour. The last grain crop can hardly 
 have been great, for in very few instances indeed are ricks to be seen 
 outside the bams, and they are not capacious enough to contain large 
 crops," &c. 
 
 Had Mr. Caird journeyed through this country in any other way than 
 by railway, he would have formed a much more correct opinion of the 
 extent under cultivation : this he has very much underrated. Fully three- 
 fourths of this whole district of country is cleared and enclosed, and a 
 large portion of it highly cultivated. If there was little Indian Com in 
 1868, it was because other crops promised to pay better, and the spring 
 of 1868 was peculiarly wet and cold; but there is a very large extent of 
 it this year, and although a little late it will prove an abundant crop. 
 The absence of ricks outside the barn, as alluded to by Mr. Caird, is 
 owing to the great abundance of timber, and the great facility with which 
 Canadians construct large barns, quite sufficient to hold even very luxu- 
 riant crops. Every good Canadian farmer provides substantial covering 
 for his whole crops, instead of having recourse to ricks with their tem- 
 porary covering of straw. The material, except nails, they have within 
 themselves, and most of them can help to build them. The work of 
 building a barn 60 feet by 30, and 18 feet post, can be done for £40 ster 
 ing; and most farmers have two if not three of these large bams, 
 besides long sheds in which to store hay, &c.; so that the u -sc nee of ricks 
 is no criterion of deficiency; but, on the contrary, their presence is 
 rather a sign that the farmer is a aew settler, and as yet unable to put up 
 the permanent covering for his produce, which old and successful farm- 
 ers universally provide. As to Mr. Caird's assertion that on this " easier 
 and more fertile soil" the cultivation of Indian corn demands too much 
 labour, it may be safely urged that labour is cheaper in Canada than in 
 Illinois, and that the corn crop is nearly as productive in the district he 
 alludes to as it is in Illinois, and being of a much superior quality sells 
 at a much higher price. The fact is, that wheat m this district has been 
 hitherto so fine, and selling at such high prices, that the growth of Indian 
 Cora has been neglected too much for the welfare of the farmer. This 
 very part of Canada which Mr. Caird describes in the above quotation 
 is noted for producing the very finest samples of wheat, weighing 62 lbs., 
 and even 63 lbs., to the Winchester bushel, and has for years carried off 
 
 •4 
 •I 
 
6 
 
 ii I 
 
 1 1 
 
 I 
 
 I' 
 
 1 1' 
 
 1 1 1 
 
 the Canada Company's prize of 100 dollars; and it was in this distr ic 
 that the prize wheat exhibited nt the Crystal Palace in England was 
 grown. There are often from 50 to 150 acres of wheat on one farm in 
 this section. The great inducement to sow wheat has hitherto caused 
 many farmers to trespass too much, perhaps, upon the properties of the 
 soil required for this crop ; but if Mr. Caird were this year to visit this 
 part of the country, and view it (not from a railway car window) he 
 would find more extensive fields of his fa\ ourite crop, and likely to pay a 
 higher acreable profit than the Illinois prairie land, because the prices 
 in Canada are almost double those of Central Illinois, where the corn is 
 of a coarser description. This perseverance in the growth of wheat is 
 an evil that time will remedy ; especially as the growth of other grain, 
 and also sheep and dairy farming, are more certainly remunerating. 
 Another extract from page,2S gives a remarkable instance of misguided 
 judgment and grievous misrepresentation, the first clause, however, of 
 the extract being perfectly true. 
 
 Mr. Caird says, " a light sandy loam of good quality, only half cleared, 
 is still valued at from £7 to £S an acre, (sterling no doubt, as all his 
 pounds are sterling throughout the pamphlet.) It is this comparatively 
 high price of land in addition to the cost of clearing off the timber, that 
 forces the emigrant westwards to a country where better soil with equal 
 facilities of transport, can be bought for less than the mere cost of clear- 
 ing this of its timber." 
 
 Taking the word ''westwards" to mean Central Illinois, which seems 
 to be the summit of Mr. Caird's American predilections, it may be most 
 safely asserted that the soil there is not better, that the facilities of trans- 
 port are not equal, and that even supposing land in Illinois could be 
 bought for less than the mere cost of clearing in Canada, (say £3 lOs. 
 sterling per acre,) Mr. Caird has omitted to state the value of the timber 
 cleared off. He will be surprised to be told that many pine trees on these 
 very farms are and were worth from 6s. to 15s. each. It it not unusual 
 for one tree to produce five saw-logs of twelve feet long each, worth 48. 
 to 5s. sterling, each log. The timber alone, of well-grown cedar swampg 
 in all the settled districts of Canada West, is worth £4 to £5 per acre, 
 on the spot ; and even if the hard wood is all burnt to ashes, the ashes 
 of three acres will, with very little outlay of capital or labour, produce a 
 barrel of potash worth £6 sterling. T le value of the timber on our wild 
 lands in good situations, where saw-mills, or rivers to float saw-logs, are 
 accessible, is very considerable. Our forests, instead of being a bugbear 
 to the intelligent emigrant, are a very great source of wealth, and enable 
 him to pay for his land, and erect the required buildings, and supply 
 fence rails, and fuel, sugar, &c., which the settler on the prairie has to 
 purchase, and sometimes at very high rates. That the soil is not better 
 in Illinois than in Canada West can be easily proved. Which gives the 
 largest crops of wheat per acre of the best quality ? Decidedly Canada 
 West. The probable average of Illinois is stated by Mr. Caird, at pages 
 
of 
 
 65 and 89, as twenty bushels per acre, but at page 64 he gives the pro- 
 bable yield at eighteen to twenty, and the real yield ''nothing but shrivel- 
 led husk;" and again at page 52, as nearly a total failure, and six 
 hundred acres killed by frost, and at pages 75 and 76, he gives the yield 
 of 1857 as little more than six bushels per acre ; and according to the 
 United States Census of 1850-1, Illinois did not yield ten bushels per acre, 
 whereas the average of all Canada West that year was 16, 14-60 ; and of 
 the counties to which Mr. Caird alludes to in the above extract, the aver- 
 age was twenty-one bushels. Then as to quality of wheat, that of Cen- 
 tral Illinois is notoriously inferior. Merchants in Toronto import large 
 quantities of it at about half the price of Canada wheat for distillery pur- 
 poses, not being fit for making flour, except what is denominated by the 
 Americans "stump-tailed flour," being of a third or fourth rate quality, and 
 this is the general character of the prairie wheat in Central Illinois. 
 Then as to price, Mr. Caird quotes it in several places at 3s, sterling, 
 (75 cents.) At the very time Mr. Caird quotes this as being the price 
 in the Illinois markets, Canada wheat was selling in Toronto and Hamil- 
 ton and all our frontier markets, at exactly double that amount, 6s. ster- 
 ling, (li dollar;) and at this date Upper Canada wheat is selling in our 
 markets at double the price of Illinois wheat in Illinois markets. 
 
 Let old country farmers remember this, that evon supposing the yield 
 of bushels per acre to be the same, the price in Canada is double, and of 
 course the value per acre double, and giving Mr. Caird's own averages, 
 20 bushels per acre, and his own prices, 3s. sterling per bushel, the Cana- 
 dian farmer would pocket £3 sterling per acre more than the prairie far« 
 mer in Illinois ; and this £3, be it remembered, is good interest for £50 
 on every acre of land sown in wheat, say one sixth of the whole arable 
 land, or £8 6s. 8d. per acre on all the wheat-producing land on the farm. 
 
 As far, therefore, as the culture of wheat is concerned, the settler in 
 Canada West has a vast advantage over the settler in the Illinois prairie, 
 the yield, the quality, and the price, being all superior in Canada West. 
 The peninsula of Upper Canada consists of soils similar to those of the 
 Genesee valley, in the state of New York, distinguished for the finest 
 quality of wheat, which the American miller eagerly buys to mix with 
 the coarser wheats of the western states. Canadian wheat makes the 
 very finest flour, whilst western wheat makes only second and third rate 
 qualities. The area of the fine wheat-growing lands on this continent is 
 very limited, and Upper Canada occupies a large portion of it. 
 
 But, says Mr. Caird, ''Indian corn is a great staple in Illinois." Let 
 us take him at his own showing, and let us see the result. The average 
 produce he gives in two places is 50 bushels per acre, and at another 40. 
 The price at page 61 is 8d. per bushel; at page 74, lOd.; and at another 
 place, page 51, one farthing per pound, or Is. 3d. per bushel; at 
 page 87 and 89, is Is. 8d. per bushel. Taking the price at Is. 3d. 
 sterling on the spot, and the produce per acre at 50 bushels, (which 
 is far too high an average, 40 ^being much more like the truth,) 
 
8 
 
 l! i1 
 
 WO hftve £3 2s. 6d per acre the produce of a good average com 
 crop in Illinois. The cost of twice ploughing, planting, horse-hoeing, 
 &c., is at least £2 2s. 6d. per acre, and the prairie farmer has £1 per 
 acre at this showing for himself for interest on his purchase money, fenc- 
 ing, buildings, Ac. Mr, Caird ha-s truly and admirably said (page 54): — 
 "If a man buys GOO acres and has not the means of cultivating more than 
 60, the 540 acres are a dead loss to him. He has to pay either the price 
 or the interest of the price of this large, unproductive extent of land. 
 The produce of the sixty acres is called upon to bear not onK 'ts own 
 burden, but that of the nine-tenths which are idle. The lean ki o thus 
 eat up the one fat one." Probably four-fifths of the settlers buy what is 
 called one quarter section, (being 160 acres,) and are not able for two or 
 three years to cultivate more than the fourth of it ; thus, the forty or 
 eighty acres under cultivation, or whatever it may be, have to pay the whole 
 interest on the purchase money of the 160 acres, and buildings erected. 
 The rent or interest of course will vary, but taking the price at £3 ster- 
 ling, and the fencing at lOs. per acre, and the buildings, Ac, at £100, 
 the rent of forty acres cropped, with house built, would be about £42 
 lOs., — thus: 
 
 First cost of land, at £8 per acre £480 
 
 Cost of fencing 160 acres, at 16s. per acre, being 640 rods, at 
 
 4s. sterling 128 
 
 Buildings, Well, &c., &c 100 
 
 £708 
 This £708 at six per cent, would be about £42 10s., or 21s. 3d. sterling 
 per acre, leaving the farmer minus Is. 3d. sterling per acre, on the 
 actual cost, giving him barely labourer's wages, and no interest for his 
 working-cattle, implements, &c., &c. The fencing of 160 acres requires 
 ■640 rods of fence, which at a very low calculation, is worth $1 per rod, 
 or 4s. sterling. Mr. Caird makes the expense of fencing £60 per mile 
 (see page 55 ;) but considering that price too high, I have taken £40 per 
 mile. If a whole section is purchased (a mile square,) the outside fence 
 on all sides would be four miles, and the acreable cost of enclosing would 
 be much less than where only a quarter section is purchased ; but every 
 prairie farmer as well as every other farmer requires subdivisions of his 
 farm, and 16s. sterling per acre is a very low estimate of the cost of 
 fencing on any farm. So that Mr. Caird's represention at pages 89 and 
 90, where he says, " The third year begins by the prairie farmer finding 
 himself the unencumbered owner of his land, all fenced and improved, 
 with a stock of horses and implements, and the whole of his original 
 capital in his pocket," is a monstrous delusion, calculatcl to do immense 
 injury to his readers, who may be thereby tempted to settle on the aguish, 
 treeless, shelterless, and arid prairies of Illinois. The idea, too, expressed 
 at page 90,;that " he may continue to crop his farm with Indian com, 
 from which he will reap very large returns on his capital," is, to say the 
 
 I 
 
9 
 
 ■age corn 
 •hoeing, 
 s £1 per 
 ley, fenc- 
 :e 6i) :-_ 
 lore than 
 •he price 
 of land, 
 ts own 
 ki thus 
 y what is 
 3r two or 
 forty or 
 he whole 
 erected. 
 £3 ster- 
 at£100, 
 )out £42 
 
 50 
 
 ?8 
 )0 
 
 >8 
 
 . sterling 
 on the 
 
 t for his 
 
 requires 
 
 per rod, 
 
 )er mile 
 
 £40 per 
 
 le fence 
 
 ? would 
 
 It every 
 
 s of his 
 
 cost of 
 
 89 and 
 
 finding 
 
 iroved, 
 
 'riginal 
 
 imense 
 
 iguish, 
 
 tressed 
 corn, 
 
 ay the 
 
 least of it, a much too glowing and sanguine view of the prairie farmer's 
 prospects. At page 00 ho gives the opinion of a Mr. Brown, an old far- 
 mer in the country, "that more money has boon made, and may be made 
 in this state by stock farming than by corn-growing ;" and adds, (pago 
 61,) "but he has not found short-horned stock so succesafnl on the 
 natural prairie grass, of which, on his own lands, ho has no longer any." 
 
 To give us an idea of stock farming, Mr. Caird leiis us (page Yl) that 
 " oxen of three years old, largo and in what we should reckon fair con- 
 dition for sUvll feeding, are valuod here, i. e., Central Illinois, at not more 
 than £4 I" And again at page (51), ho quotes the price of beef at 2d. per 
 lb.; and at page 72, a Kentucky farmer admits that two acres of his best 
 bine grass land in Illinois were noeded to fatten a three-year old short 
 homed ox. At these prices stock farming cannot be profitable at all, 
 and if better than corn-growing, what inference may we draw ? The 
 story of the ox and two hogs eating a hundred bushels of Indian corn 
 (page Y4,) and then being sold at 2d. per lb., is not calculated to give 
 very favourable views of prairie farming. It is well Mr. Caird has so 
 frankly represented these facts to enable British farmers to judge for 
 themselves. It may be well to state hero that cattle, shcop, beef, mutton, 
 pork, and grain of all kinds in Canada, are fully double the prices quoted 
 by Mr. Caird as being the prices in Central Illinois; and intelligent 
 British farmers will no doubt govern themselves accordingly, especially 
 as all other crops, except Indian com, are more productive in Canada 
 West, and labour quite as cheap. These high prices may be supposed to 
 militate against mechanics and manufacturers, but where agricultural pro- 
 ducts are high, mechanics find more employment and better wages than 
 when they are low. The farmers being more prosperous, are better able 
 to carry on improvements of all kinds. Mr. Caird, at page 50, quotes 
 the wages of a journeyman carpenter at 4s. por day, with his board ; 
 these wages are rather lower than in Canada, but the colony has suffered 
 80 severely by the late exceptional reverses, that there is little employ- 
 ment for tradesmen at present at high wages. If we have a good harvest 
 and an average crop, times will improve rapidly ; but it may be safely 
 stated that it is not probable that either Illinois or Canada will ever again 
 reach that state of inflated prosperity, caused by the late expenditure of 
 millions of dollars in the purchase and formation of railway routes. The 
 benefit of the colony will be permanent and substantial, but the first 
 pioneers of the benefit will probably be severe sufferers. Mr. Caird has 
 well said, and it appears true with regard to Canada also, that, "the de- 
 velopment of railway accommodation has been too rapid, and has for the 
 present outrun the immediate requirements of Illinois." 
 
 I have alluded to the fact that wheat and all other grain, except Indian 
 com, are more productive in Canada West than in Central Illinois. The 
 circumstances of climate are, perhaps, the chief cause of the superiority 
 of Canada West. The great wheat-producing countries of Europe lie be- 
 tween the 50th and 59th degrees of north lattitude, where the summer 
 
 '•>. 
 
 ->«i*M 
 
10 
 
 I' ) 
 
 I 
 V » 
 
 I' 
 
 !;■ 
 
 I'; 
 
 temj)erature is from 55 ° to C5 ° ; but in Central Illinois, where the lati- 
 tude is about 38 ° , the summer heat is 78 ° , and often as high in ihe 
 shade as from 90 to 100 ° in June, July, and August. This climate is 
 too hot for the profitable culture of European grains or grasses ; they 
 grow there, it is true, but are generally of a very inferior description. 
 The wheat this year (1859) is fortunately a very tolerable sample, and 
 the yield a fair average ; much of it was harvested the first week of July : 
 one very large field, I was told by a farming friend who witnessed the 
 operation, was cut with a "heading machine," i. e., the heads of the 
 wheat were cut off immediately bolow the ear, and dropped into a box 
 which was emptied into waggons accompanying the machine. The straw 
 being of little value was left standing. 
 
 As far as regards the wheat crop, this year is an improvement upon 
 several of the past years ; but as to other crops, barley, oats, rye, and 
 peas, there does not appear to be much change for the better., With 
 the exception of Indian corn, they are not ])y any means extensively or 
 successfully cultivated. 
 
 By the last census of Canada, token in 1851-52, her population was 
 about 1-13 of that of the Union, her occupied acres about l-17th ; yet 
 her growth of wheat ^vas very nearly one-sixth of that of the whole Union, 
 of barley it was more than one-fourth, and of oats one-seventh. Of all 
 grain, exclusive of Indian corn, Canada produced one-sixth of that of the 
 whole Union, territories included. 
 
 These are important facts for the consideration of British emigrants, 
 who, instead of settling on the bleak prairies of the United States, may 
 wish to enjoy a climate not very different from their own, and decidedly 
 healthful ; and who may wish to cultivate the same species and description 
 of grain that they have been used to, or to continue their dairies, or to 
 indulge in their beef and mutton producing tendencies, with a fair hope 
 of remuneration. 
 
 The prospect of having but little fruit in Central Illinois, is another 
 very important consideration. The land wliere trees do not naturally 
 grow, can scarcely be expected to be very congenial to fruit trees. It is 
 only too true that in many parts of Illinois fruit trees will not thrive. 
 
 Another extract fiom Mr. Caird (page 29) is worthy of comment, as it 
 portrays a great want of knowledge of facts with regard to the relative 
 increase of population in Canada and Illinois, and is calculated to mis- 
 lead his readers. Mr. C. says, " Canada West is richer than Canada 
 East, and is more populous ; but there is a richer territory still farther 
 west, where labour is yet more productive, and, though in the present 
 state of the country the risk of health is greater, it is ten times more po- 
 pulous, for men push on to the land in which they can most quickly and 
 easily earn an independence." 
 
 What will Mr. Caird himself say, when he is told that Canada West has 
 increased in population in a much greater ratio than his favourite state of 
 Illinois I 
 
11 
 
 |the lati* 
 in ihe 
 
 |imate is 
 , they 
 
 [:ription. 
 
 3le, and 
 
 3f July: 
 
 ssed the 
 of the 
 a box 
 
 be straw 
 
 It is 
 
 By the United States Census of 1850, it appears that the three states 
 of Ohio, Michigan, and Illinois, contained in 1830, 1,126,851, and in 
 1850, 3,505,000 ; a little over 320 per cent, in twenty years. Canada 
 West contained in 1830, 210,437 ; in 1850, 791,000, which is over 375 
 per cent, for the same period of twenty years ; so that the increase in 
 these choice states was fifty-five per cent, less than that of Canada West 
 during the same time. Some of our counties in Canada West, viz., Huron, 
 Perth, and Bruce, have increased 571 per cent, in ten years. 
 
 Comparing the last decade of Canada West with that of the United 
 States, we find that the increase during the ten years from 1840 to 1850, 
 was 35*27 per cent., whilst that of Upper Canada was 104*58 per cent. 
 
 We have had no census in Canada since 1851-52 ; but there is every 
 reason to believe that t'.ie ratio of increase, not including immigration, 
 has continued very muca the same, and there is a certainty that Mr. 
 Caird's representation as to comparative increase of population in Illinois 
 is entirely erroneous. Immigration to the United States has fallen off 
 quite as much in proportion as that into Canada. The statement that an 
 independence can be more quickly and easily earned in Illinois than in 
 Canada West, is simply a delusion, and has been frequently proved by the 
 return of settlers, who, like Mr. Caird, were attracted by the more iuviting 
 appearance of prairies to old-country eyes. But as Mr. Caird has given a 
 Dr. and Cr. for Illinois, at page 89, I will give a similar one for Canada. 
 Let old-country capitalists who can command the required sum (say £7 50 
 sterling) diligently compare the two, and keep in mind the permanent 
 difference in the quality and prices of produce, and the healthfulness of 
 Canada, and the choice between the two will be no difficult matter to 
 decide, even in the matter of dollars and cents, without alluding to our 
 British Constitution, our British feeling, British tone of morality, our 
 British social atmosphere, &c., which Britons always appreciate more 
 highly after a short residence in the United States. 
 
 Mr. Caird thus gives the probable Dr. and Cr. of 100 acres of land for 
 two years in Central Illinois. 
 
 Dr. 
 
 Cash price of 100 acres, sterling £200 
 
 Contract price of fencing, breaking, sowing with wheat, reaping 
 and threshing, and building a labourer's cottage, and stable 
 
 and shed 250 
 
 Capital invested in the purchase of four horses, implements and 
 
 harness 110 
 
 £560 
 2nd year, wages of 2 men, horse-keep, taxes and accounts 200 
 
 £760 
 
12 
 
 r '' 
 
 |i ' 
 
 I 
 
 Ml 
 
 I." I 
 
 1^' 
 
 Cr. 
 
 Ist crop wheat, 2000 bushels at Ss. 6d., £350 ; 2nd crop Indian 
 
 corn, 5000 bushels, at Is. 8d., £416 766 
 
 Surplus after second crop, besides the value of land and stock. .£600 
 
 In Canada West the Dr. and Cr. arc on the same basis. Taking 100 
 acres brought into cultivation, they would stand thus: Capitalists can 
 bring 100 acres into cultivation in Canada, as well as in the United States, 
 although such is seldom or never done that I am aware of. 
 
 Dr. 
 
 Cash price of 100 acres of land, at 3s. 3d £16 6 
 
 Contract price for clearing, fencing, and seeding, at £3 10s. per 
 
 acre 350 
 
 Contract price for building a small hcuso or shed. 60 
 
 Capital invested in oxen, (two yoke) chains, &c 34 
 
 Capital invested in potash kettle. 10 
 
 Capital invested in labour making potash and barrels 40 
 
 Second year, board and wages of 3 men and 5 in harvest, ox 
 
 keep, &c 180 
 
 £680 6 
 Cr. 
 
 Potash, 20 barrels, at £0 £120 
 
 Pine timber, say 100 trees, at Gs '. 30 
 
 (Where the timber is good for making potash there 
 is not much pine, for this reason I have set 
 down a small sum.) 
 
 First crop of wheat, 2000 bushels, at 5s 500 
 
 Second crop, barley, rye, oats, peas, and potatoes, 
 
 at £3 per acre, average 300 
 
 950 
 
 Surplus after the second crop, besides land, &c ..£269 15 
 
 This comparison, which is justly and fairly given, shews that the Cana- 
 dian capitalist has the advantage over the prairie capitalist of £269 15s. 
 sterling in two years ; and to shew that these representations are by no 
 means overdrawn, I give below the official published returns by our 
 Government agent, on the Ottawa, of the total produce of 800 acres of 
 newly cleared land, for the yenr 1858, with the prices which he has 
 attached, and which are not, as may be deemed, exceptional. 
 
 Mr. French says : — "Upon those 800 acres there were raised: 
 
 5726 bushels of wheat, at $1 per bushel $5726 00 
 
 2916 ** oats, at 40 cents per bushel 1166 40 
 
 Carried forward $6892 40 
 
 ->:^ 
 

 
 
 
 fng 100 
 
 lists can 
 
 States, 
 
 6 
 
 
 
 
 
 i 
 
 ) 
 
 ) 
 
 ) 
 
 ) 6 
 
 ) 
 
 
 
 16 
 
 Cana- 
 9 15s. 
 bj no 
 y our 
 res of 
 e has 
 
 !6 00 
 i6 40 
 
 '2 40 
 
 18 
 
 Brought forward ....$6892 40 
 
 149 bushels of barley, at 60 cents per bushel 74 60 
 
 168 « Indian corn, at $1 per bushel 168 00 
 
 16799 «' potato at 10 cents per bushel 6718 30 
 
 6360 " tuiu ,it 10 cents per bushel 635 00 
 
 87 tons of hay, a'. •. dollars per ton 435 00 
 
 260 tons of straw, at 4 dollars per ton 1040 00 
 
 4012 lbs. of sugar, at 10 cents per lb 401 20 
 
 108 barrels of potash, at 24 dollars per barrel 2522 00 
 
 9169 bushel of ashes, at 8 cents per bushel 739 92 
 
 Making a total of $19626 32 
 
 And showing the average value of each acre to be something over 
 twenty-four dollars sixty cents, or £5 sterling for one year," an amount 
 far above Mr. Caird's representation of the Illinois prairies. For three 
 of the above articles, viz., potatoes, hay, and straw, a market could not 
 be found on a prairie farm ; and three other articles, potash, ashes, and 
 sugar, could not be produced. Mr. French has omitted to give credit 
 for the timber used iu their houses and sheds, or sold to timber mer- 
 chants. 
 
 1. t old-country farmers carefully compare these two statements, and 
 lemember also that they are likely to have good health in Canada, good 
 water, and plenty of it, and no necessity of Artesian wells 127 teet deep j 
 good apples and pears and small fruit, and vegetables of every kind in 
 abundance, good markets for every thing they grow, good timber for 
 their houses and fences and fires, and a good Government that provides 
 handsomely for the education of their families — even much better than 
 in the United States ; and if they will be guided by the honest opinion of 
 a man of twenty-five years' experience in Canada as an agriculturist, 
 they will pause before they prefer the prairies of Central Illinois to the 
 woods of Canada. The woods modify the heat of summer and cold of 
 winter, whilst the prairies of Illinois are subject to temfic winds and 
 storms and snow in winter, and often most dreadful and devastating fires 
 — and the ever-falling leaves of our woods arc ever depositing a rich 
 compost, far superior to that of the long thin prairie grass. There is 
 still another very important consideration regarding these level prairie 
 lands, that is, that many of them cannot be settled on till drained of the 
 sour and unwholesome surface water ; and, from the nature of the coun- 
 try, draining is a very expensive operation, and not unfrcquently entirely 
 impracticable. Deep permanent springs are often very difiicult to find, 
 and there is much suQering both by man and beast for want of reallf 
 good pure water. 
 
 To corroborate what I have said, with regard to the deficiency of the 
 yield of wheat, and other crops in the United States, I give below a quo- 
 tation from a very late and very clever publication by John Jay, being 
 " A Statistical View of American Agriculture, ita Homo Resources and 
 
14 
 
 ;» 
 
 I' ) 
 
 I' 
 
 I it 
 
 Foreign Markets, &c., in an address delivered at New York before the 
 American Geographical and Statistical Society, on the Organization of 
 the Agricultural Section," New York, 1869. " The average number of 
 bushels of wheat to the acre in Alabama and Georgia is five ; in North 
 Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee, seven ; ranging upwards in the other 
 States until it reaches twelve m New York, Ohio, and Indiana; thirteen 
 in Maryland and Vermont ; fourteen in Iowa and Wisconsin ; fifteen in 
 Florida, Pennsylvania, and Texas j and sixteen (the highest average) in 
 Massachusetts. Oats range from ten bushels to the acre through various 
 intermediate gradations, to thirty.five and thirty-six bushels, which is the 
 highest." The Journal of the Highland Society of Scotland thus 
 observes : " If the above statement, as given by Mr. Jay, be correct, 
 the state of farming in many parta of America must be indeed in a 
 wretched condition — the American maximum corresponds to our mini* 
 mum;" adding, however, the following, v/hich appears to be only too true 
 with regard to late years, but reports of this year's crop indicate that 
 the evil is not progressing. "We believe," says the Journal, "that 
 the wheat crop has recently suffered much from the increased ravages of 
 insects, and from various diseases to which it seems to be becoming more 
 and more subject." 
 
 Since the above was written, the prospects of the wheat crop in the 
 United States this year appear to be more promising than usual, and in 
 Canada there is every prospect of a very handsome return. From all 
 quarters of Canada West, reports have been sent to this office of 
 expected large crops of wheat, say from thirty to forty bushels per acre ; 
 and of spring grain most abundant supplies, including that of Indian 
 corn : and corroborative of what I have stated, with regard to the yield 
 of this grain in Illinois not exceeding forty bushels per acre, I again 
 quote Mr. Jay's statements, as given by the same journal : " Commenc- 
 ing," he says, "at eleven bushels per acre, the returns of produce of 
 Indian corn range through various gradations in the difiFerent States, up 
 to thirty-two in Vermont and Iowa ; thirty-three in Missouri ; thirty six 
 in Ohio, and forty in Connecticut." This last is the highest return 
 given. 
 
 1 am, Sir, 
 
 Yours, with respect, 
 
 Toronto, July 22, 1859. 
 
 WILLIAM HUTTON, 
 Secretary to Bureau of Agriculture. 
 
 UHlYERSmr OF WINDSOR UBRARf 
 
 /3o 
 
 777 
 
 1 1 I 
 
fore the 
 ;ation of 
 mber of 
 n North 
 le other 
 thirteen 
 fteen in 
 rage) in 
 varioas 
 h is the 
 d thus 
 correct; 
 d in a 
 ir mini- 
 00 true 
 te that 
 "that 
 ages of 
 Z more 
 
 in the 
 and in 
 3m all 
 ice of 
 
 acrej 
 rndian 
 5 yield 
 
 again 
 menc- 
 uce of 
 es, up 
 •tjsix 
 'eturn 
 
 re.