IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) fe ^/ /^^#> C v^-^ :/. 1.0 I.I l^|28 |2.5 us US 2.0 1.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 ^ 6" - ► ^ ^ /a ^/). ''a > ■> ■^^.^v *> (9 / s Photographic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) 872-4503 signifie "A SUIVRE ", le symbole V signifie "FIN". Maps, plates, charts, etc., may be filmed at different reduction ratios. Those too large to be entirely included in one exposure are filmed beginning in the upper left hand corner, left to right and top to bottom, as many frames as required. The following diagrams illustrate the method: Les cartes, planches, tableaux, etc., peuvent dtre filmis d des taux de reduction diffdrents. Lorsque le document est trop grand pour dtre reproduit en un seul clich6, il est filmd d partir de Tangle supdrieur gauche, de gauche i droite, et de haut en bas, en prenant le nombre d'images ndcessaire. Les diagrammes suivants illustrent la mithode. 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 I OSG t .< ' T\U'. EXPOSITORS BIJiLi:. EDITED BY THE REV. W. ROr.KRTSON NICOLf,,. M..\, EMoy of " T/i? Expositor," THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. BY TIIK REV. C. J. BALL, M.A. \\- TORONTO : l.l.Akh TRACT !)i;i>(.)SITOR\- A\i) niillK DKl'OT, Corner of Vonge and Temi'erance SxKELTb. 1890. THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE. 1889-90. C>vivn Zvo. Cloth. Price ys, 6d. each. JUDGES AND RUTH. By the Rev. R. A. Watson, M.A. THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. By the Rev. C. J. Ball, M.A., Chaplain of Lincoln's Inn. THE PROPHECIES OF ISAIAH. Vol. II. Completing the Work. By the Rev. Gkorge Adam Smith, M.A. THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW. By the Rer. I. Monro Gibson, D.D., London, Author of "The Mosaic Era,'" etc. THE BOOK OF EXODUS. By the Very Rev. G. A. Ciiadwick, D.D., Uean of Armaph. THE BOOK OF THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. By the Rev. G. T. Stokes, D.D., Professor of Ecclesiastical History in the University of Dublin. 1888-89. Cnnvn St'i?. Cloth. Price ys. 6(1. each. THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS. By the Rev. Professor G. G. Finijlav, B.A., Headingley College, Leeds. THE BOOK OF ISAIAH. Chap. I. to XXXIX. By the Rev. George Adam Smith, M.A., Aberdeen. THE PASTORAL EPISTLES. By the Rev. Alfred Plum- MER, D.D., Master of University College, Durham. THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. Professor Marcus Dods, D.D. THE REVELATION OF ST. JOHN. By the Rev. Professor W. Milligan, D.D., of the University of Aberdeen. THE EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN. By the Right Rev. W. Alexander, D.D., D.C.L., Lord Bishop of Derry and Raphoe. 1887-88. Crown ?,vo. Cloth, Price js. 6d. each. THE EPISTLE TO THE COLOSSIANS. By Alexander Maclaren, D.D., of Manchester. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MARK. By the Rev. Prebendary G. A. Chadvvick, D.D., Dean of Armagh. THE BOOK OF GENESIS. By the Rev. Professor Marcus DoDS, D.D. THE FIRST BOOK OF SAMUEL. By the Rev. Professor W. G. Biaikie, D.D., LL.D. THE SECOND BOOK OF SAMUEL. By the same Author. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. By the Rev. Principal T. C. Edwards, M.A. yo f . ^ THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. M\X\ a ^Mt)i j)f Jis gifi; anj^ g^ij^t^ g^ BY THE UEV, C. J. BALL, M.A., Chajilain of Lincoln's Inn; CONTRIBUTOR TO BISHOP ELLICOTT's "COMMENTARY. " THE speaker's COMMENTARY,'" KTC. TORONTO : WILLARD TRACT DEPOSITORY AND BIBLE DEPOT, Corner of Yonge and Temperance Streets. 1890. CONTENTS. PAGE PRELIMINARY SKETCH OF THE UFE AND TIMES OF JEREMIAH I I. THE CALL AND CONSECRATION • • • . • 58 II. THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT . 74 III. ISRAEL AND JUDAH— A CONTRAST 114 IV. THE SCYTHIANS AS THE SCOURGE OF GOD 134 V. POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION 149 VI. THE IDOLS OF THE HEATHEN AND THE GOD OF ISRAEL .21$ VII. THE BROKEN COVENANT 248 VI CONTENTS. VIII. THK TALL OF PRIDE • • rAr.E . 2 So IX. THE DROUGHT AND ITS MORAL IMPLICATIONS • • • 300 X. THE SABBATH — A WARNING . . 364 XI. THK DIVINE POTTER • 377 XII. THE BROKEN VESSEL — A SYMBOL OF JUDGMENT . 3Q8 XIII. JEREMIAH UNDER PERSECUTION . 411 PRELIMINARY SKETCH OF THE LIFE AND TIMES OF JEREMIAH. A PRIEST by birth, Jeremiah became a prophet by the special call of God. His priestly origin implies a good literary training, in times when litera- ture was largely in the hands of the priests. The priesthood, indeed, constituted a principal section of the Israelitish nobility, as appears both from the his- tory of those times, and from the references in our prophet's writings, where kings and princes and priests are often named together as the aristocracy of the land (i. i8, ii. 26, iv. 9); and this fact would ensure for the young prophet a share in all the best learning of his age. The name of Jeremiah, like other prophetic proper names, seems to have special signifi- cance in connexion with the most illustrious of the persons recorded to have borne it. It means lahvali foimdeth, and, as a proper name, The Man that lahvah foundeth ; a designation which finds vivid illustration in the words of Jeremiah's call : " Before I moulded thee in the belly, I knew thee ; and before thou camest forth from the womb, I consecrated thee : a spokesman to the nations did I make thee"(i. 5). The not un- common name of Jeremiah — six other persons of the name are numbered in the Old Testament— must have appeared to the prophet as invested with new force and I 7 PREUMINAKY SKETCH OF meaning, in the light of this revelation. Even before his birth he had been " founded " ' and predestined by God for the work of his Hfe. The IIili., rcligiott) of their God (Isa. xlii. l) : I will get me unto the great men, and will speak with them ; for they know the way of lahvah, the rule of their God : " he again seems to suggest a prior ministry, of how- ever brief duration, upon the smaller stage of Anathoth. At all events, there is nothing against the conjecture that the prophet may have passed to and fro between his birthplace and Jerusalem, making occasional sojourn in the capital, until at last the machinations of his Hitzig, Vorbemerktingen. lO PRELIMINARY SKETCH OF neighbours (xi. 19 sqq.), and as appears from xii. 6, his own kinsmen, drove him to quit Anathoth for ever. If Hitzig be right in referring Psalms xxiii., xxvi.-xxviii. to the prophet's pen, we may find in them evidence of the fact that the temple became his favourite haunt, and indeed his usual abode. As a priest by birth, he would have a claim to live in some one of the cells that surrounded the temple on three sides of it. The 23rd Psalm, though written at a later period in the prophet's career — -I shall refer to it again by-and-by — closes with the words, " And I will return unto (Ps. vii. 17; Hos. xii. 7) the house of lahvah as long as I live," or perhaps, "And I will return (and dwell) in" etc, as though the temple were at once his sanctuary and his home. In hke manner, Ps. xxvi. speaks of one who " washed his hands, in innocency " {i.e. in a state of innocency ; the symbolical action corresponding to the real state of his heart and conscience), and so "compassed the altar of lahvah"; "to proclaim with the sound of a psalm of thanksgiving, and to rehearse all His wondrous works." The language here seems even to imply (Ex. xxx. 19-21), that the prophet took part, as a priest, in the ritual of the altar. He con- tinues : " lahvah, I love the abode of thine house, And the place of the dwelling of Thy glory ! " and concludes, " My foot, it standeth on a plain ; In the congregations I bless lahvah," speaking as one con- tinually present at the temple services. His prayers " Judge me," i.e.. Do me justice, " lahvah ! " and " Take not away my soul among sinners. Nor my life among men of bloodshed ! " may point either to the conspiracies of the Anathothites, or to subsequent persecutions at Jerusalem. The former seem to be intended both here, and in Ps. xxvii., which is certainly THE LIFE AND TIMES OF JEREMIAH. II most appropriate as an Ode of Thanksgiving for the prophet's escape from the murderous attempts of the men of Anatiioth. Nothing could be more apposite than the aUusions to " evil-doers drawing near against him to eat up his flesh " (/>., according to the common Aramaic metaphor, to slander him, and destroy him with false accusations); to the 'Mying witnesses, and the man (or men) breathing out (or panting after) violence" (ver. 12); and to having been forsaken even by his father and mother (ver. lo). With the former, we may compare the prophet's words, chap. ix. 2 sqq.^ " O that I were in the wilderness, in a lodge of way- faring men ; that I might forsake my people, and depart from among them ! For all of them are adulterous, an assembly of traitors. And they have bent their tongue, (as it were) their bow for lying ; and it is not by sincerity that they have grown strong in the land. Beware ye, every one of his friend, and have no confidence in any brother : for every brother will assuredly supplant " (ipv* 2)\)V a reference to Jacob and Esau), " and every friend will gad about for slander. And each will deceive his friend, and the truth they will not speak : they have taught their tongue to speak lies ; with perverseness they have wearied themselves. Thy dwelling is in the midst of deceit. ... A murderous arrow is their tongue ; deceit hath it spoken ; with his mouth one speaketh peace with his neighbour, and inwardly he layeth an ambush for him." Such lan- guage, whether in the psalm or in the prophetic oration, could only be the fruit of bitter personal experience, (Cf. also xi. 19 sqg., xx. 2 sqq., xxvi. 8, xxxvi. 26, xxxvii. 15, xxxviii. 6). The allusion of the psalmist to being forsaken by father and mother (Ps. xxvii. 10) may be illustrated by the prophet's words, chap. xii. 6. 13 PNRr/.VLVARY SKETCH OF Jeremiah came prominently forward at a serious crisis in the history of his people. The Scythian in- vasion of Asia, described by Herodotus (i. 103-106), but not mentioned in the biblical histories of the time, was threatening Palestine and Judea. According to the old Greek writer, Cyaxares the Mede, while engaged in besieging Nineveh, was attacked by a great horde of Scythians, under their king Madyes, who had entered Asia in pushing their pursuit of the Cimmerians, whom they had expelled from Europe.^ The Medes lost the battle, and the barbarous victors found themselves masters of Asia. Thereupon they marched for Egypt, and had made their way past Ascalon, when they were met by the envoys of Psammitichus I. the king of Egypt, whose "gifts and prayers," induced them to return. On the way back, some few of them lagged behind the main body, and plundered the famous temple of Atergatis-I erceto, or as Herodotus calls the great Syrian goddess, Ourania Afrodite, at Ascalon (the goddess avenged herself by smiting them and their descendants with impotence — dqXeiau vovaov, cf. I Sam. v. 6 sqq.). For eight and twenty years the Scythians remained the tyrants of Asia, and by their exactions and plundering raids brought ruin everywhere, until at last Cyaxares and his Medes, by help of treachery, recovered their former sway. After this, the Medes took Nineveh, and reduced the Assyrians to complete subjection ; but Babylonia remained independent. Such is the story as related by Herodotus, our sole authority in the matter. It has been supposed^ that the 59th Psalm ' The Cimmerians arc the Gomcr of Scripture, the Gimirraa of the cuneiform inscriptions. -• Ewald, Die Psalmen, 165. THE I. HE AND TIMES OF JEKEMIAU. »3 enng lixares their , and but story the salm of the was written by king Josiah, while the Scythians were threatening Jerusalem. Their wild hordes, ravenous for plunder, like the Gauls who at a later time struck Rome with panic, are at any rate well described in the verse " They return at eventide, They howl like the clogs, the famished pariah dogs of an eastern town — And surround the city." But the Old Testament furnishes other indications of the terror which preceded the Scythian invasion, and of the merciless havoc which accompanied it. The short prophecy of Zephaniah, who prophesied "in the days of Josiah ben Anion king of Judah," and was therefore a contemporary of Jeremiah, is best explained by reference to this crisis in the affairs of Western Asia. Zephaniah's very first word is a startling menace. " I will utterly away with everything from off the face of the ground, saith lahvah." " I will away with man and beast, I will away with the birds of the air, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumblingblocks along with the wicked {i.e. the idols with their worshippers) ; and I will exterminate man from off the face of the ground, saith lahvah." The imminence of a sweeping destruction is announced. Ruin is to overtake every existing thing ; not only the besotted people and their dumb idols, but beasts and birds and even the fish of the sea are to perish in the universal catastrophe. It is exactly what might be expected from the sudden appearance of a horde of barbarians of unknown numbers, sweeping over a civilised country from north to south, like some devastating flood ; slaying whatever M pKF.r.nriNARY sKF/rcir of crossed their path, burning towns and temples, and devouring the floci'^ ji THE r n-'E Asn times or ieremiah. »5 The public clanger, which stimiiUitccl the retlcxion and lent force to the invective of the lesser prophet, intensified the impression produced by the earlier preaching of Jeiemiah. The tidt* of invasion, indeed, rolled past Juden, without working much permanent harm to the little kingdom, with whose destinies were involved the highest interests of mankind at large. But this respite from destruction wouUl be understood by the prophet's hearers as proof of the relentings of lahvah towards His penitent people ; and may, for the time at least, have confirmed the impression wrought upon the popular mind by Jeremiah's passionate cen- sures and entreaties. The time was otherwise favour- able ; for the year of his call was the year immediately subsequent to that in which the young king Josiali " began to purify Judah and Jerusalem from the high places and the Asherim, and the carven images and the molten images," which he did in the twelfth year of his reign, i.e. in the twentieth year of his age, according to the testimony of the Chronicler (2 Chron. xxxiv. 3), which there is no good reason for disallowing. Jere- miah was probably about the same age as the king, as he calls himself a mere youth (na'ar). After the Scythians had retired — if we are right in fixing their invasion so early in the reign — the official reformation of public worship was taken up again, and completed by the eighteenth year of Josiah, when the prophet might be about twenty-five. The finding of what is called " the book of the Law," and " the book of the Covenant," by Hilkiah the high priest, while the temple was being restored by the king's order, is represented by the histories as having determined the further course of the iTlinn IBD, 2 Kings xxii. 8; nn^n "IBD, 2 Kings xxiii. 2. i6 PNEl.lMINAKY SKIil'Cir Oh roval reforms. What this book of tlic Law was, it is not necessary now to (h'scuss. It is clear from the language of the hook of Kings, and from the references of Jeremiali, tliat tlie substance of it, at any rate, closely corresponded with porti^.ns of Deuteronomy. It appears from his own words (chap. xi. i-8) that at first, at all events, Jeremiah was an earnest preacher of the positive precepts of this hook of the Covenant. It is true that his name do«s not occur in the narrative of Josiah's reformation, as related in Kings. There the king and ids counsellors iiKpiireof lahvah through the prophetess Iluldah (2 Kings xxii. 14). Supposing the account to be b(jth comj)]! te and correct, this only shows that live years after his call, Jeremiah was still unknown or little considered at court. Hut he was doubtless included among the "prophets," who, with "the king and all the men of Judah and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem," " and the priests . . . and all the people, both small and gnat," after the words of the newfound book of the Covenant had been read in their ears, bound them?clves by a solemn league and covenant, "to walk after lahweh, and to keep His commandments, and Mis laws, and His statutes, with all the heart, and with all the soul" (2 Kings xxiii. 3). It is evident that at first the young prophet hoped great things of this national league and the associated reforms in the public worship. In his eleventh chapter, he writes thus : " The word that fell to Jeremiah from lahvah, saying : Hear ye the Avords of this covenant " — presumably the words of the new- found book of the Torah — " And speak ye to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And thou shalt say unto them " — the change from the second plural "hear ye," " speak ye," is noticeable. In the first instance, no doubt, the message contemplates the leaders I I \ THE 1. 1 IE ANn TIMES Of JEN EM I All. 17 of the rt'forminj; movciiuiit gciu rally ; tin- pn»plut is siHcially acldrcssctl in tin- words, "And thou shalt say iiiUo tli«iM, Tims said lalivah, thr GikI of IsiacI, Cursi-d is till- man tiiat will not hear the words of this covenant, wliicli I connnandcd your fathers, in the tlay when I brought them forth from the land of Kgypt, from the iron furnace, ;:aying, Ih-arken to My voice, and do them, accoiiiing to all that I connnand you; and ye shall become to Me a people, and 1 — I will become to you EU)him : in order to make good the oath that I sware to your fathers, to give them a land flowing with milk and honey, as at this day. " And I answered and said. So be it, lahvah ! "And lahvah said unto me, l^roclaim all these words in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem, saying, Hear ye the words of this covenant, and do them. For I solemnly adjured your fathers, at the time when 1 brought them up out of the land of Kgypt, (and) unto this day, with all earnestness [earnestly and incessantly], saying, Hearken ye to My voice. And they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, and they walked individually in the stubbornness of their evil heart. So I brought upon them all the words of this covenant" — /.<■., the curses, which constituted the sanction of it : see Deut. iv. 25 sqq., xxviii. 15 sqq. — " (this covenant) which I commanded them to do, and they did it not." [Or perhaps, " Because I bade them ih, and they did not ; " implying a general prescription of conduct, which was not observed. Or, " I who had bidden them do, and they did not" — ^justifying, as it were, God's assumption of the function of punishment. His law had been set at nought ; the national reverses, therefore, were His infliction, and not another's.] This, then, was the first preaching of Jeremiah. " I lear i8 rNFJ.IMlNARV SKinCH OF ye the words of this covenant ! " — the covenant drawn out with such |)r(!cision and legal formality in the new- found book of the Torah. Up and down the country, " in the cities of Judah " and "in the streets of Jerusalem," everywhere within the bounds of the little kingdom that acknowledged the house of David, he published this panacea for the actual and imminent evils of the time, insisting, we may be sure, with all the eloquence of a youthful patriot, upon the impressive warnings embodied in the past history of Israel, as set forth in the book of the J. aw. But his best efforts were fruit- less. Eloquence and patriotism and enlightened spiritual beliefs and lofty purity of purpose were wasted upon a generation blinded by its own vices and reserved for a swiftly approaching retribution. l*erhaf)s the plots which drove the prophet finally from his native place were due to the hostility evoked against him by his preaching of the Law. At all events, the account of them immediately follows, in this eleventh chapter (vers. 1 8 ^v/V-)- ^^^ '^ must be borne in mind that the Law-book was not found until five years after his call to the office of pro bet. In any case, it is not difficult to understand the i)opular irritation at what must have seemed the unreasonable attitude of a prophet, who, in spite of the wholesale destruction of the outward symbols of idolatry effected by the king's orders, still declared that the claims of lahweh were unsatisfied, and that something more was needed than the purging of Judah and Jerusalem from the high places and the Ashe rim, if the Divine favour were to be conciliated, and the country restored to permanent prosperity. The people probably supposed that they had sufficiently fulfilled the law of their God, when they had not only demolished all sanctuaries but His, but had THE LIFE /N/y TIMES OF JEREMIAH. 19 done away with all those local holy places where lahvah was indeed worsiiipped, but with a deplorable admixture of heathenish rites. The law of the one legal sanctuary, so much insisted upon in Deuteronomy, was formally established by Josiah, and the national worship was henceforth centralized in Jerusalem, which from this time onward remained in the eyes of all faithful Israelites "the place where men ought to worship)." It is entirely in accordance with what we know of human nature in general, and not merely of Jewish nature, that the popular mind failed to rise to the level of the prophetic teaching, and that the reform- ing zeal of the time should have exhausted itself in efibrts which effected no more than these external changes. The truth is that the reforming movement began from above, not from below ; and however earn- est the young king may have been, it is probable that the mass of his subjects viewed the abolition of the high-places, and the other sweeping measures, initiated in obedience to the precepts of the book of the Covenant, either with apathy and indifference, or with feelings of sullen hostility. The |)riesthood of Jerusalem were, of course, benefited by the abolition of all sanctuaries, except the one wherein they ministered and received their dues. The writings of our prophet amply demon- strate that, whatever zeal for lahvah, and whatever degree of compunction for the past may have animated the prime movers in the reformation of the eighteenth of Josiah, no radical improvement was effected in the ordinary life of the nation. For some twelve years, indeed, the well-meaning king continued to occupy the throne; years, it may be presumed, of comparative peace and prosperity for Judah, although neither the narrative of Kings and Chronicles nor that of Jeremiah 20 PRKUMINARY SKETCH OF gives us any information about them. l)oubtIess it was generally supposed that the nation was reaping the reward of its obedience to the law of lahvah. But at the end of that period, circ. n.c. 608, an event occurred which must have shaken this faith to its foundations. In the thirty-first year of his reign, Josiah fell in the battle of Megiddo, while vainly opposing the small forces at his command to the hosts of Egypt. Great indeed nuist have been the " searchings of heart" occasioned by this unlooked-for and overwhelming stroke. Strange that it should have fallen at a time when, as the people deemed, the God of Israel was receiving His due at their hands ; when the injunctions of the book of the Covenant had been minutely carried out, the false and irregular worships abolished, and Jerusalem made the centre of the; cultus ; a time when it seemed as if the Lord had become reconciled to His people Israel, when years of peace and plenty seemed 10 give demonstration of the fact ; and when, as may perhaps be inferred from Josiah's expedition against Necho, the extension of the border, contemplated in the book of the Law, was con- sidered as likely to be realised in the near fuiure. The height to which the national asjiirations had soared only made the fall more disastrous, complete, ruinous. The hopes of Judah rested upon a worldly founda- tion ; and it was necessary that a people whose blindness was only intensified by prosperity, should be undeceived by the discipline of overthrow. No hint is given in the meagre narrative of the reign as to whether the j)rophets had lent their countenance or not to the fatal expedition. Probably they did ; probably they too had to learn by bitter exj^erience, that no man, not even a zealous and godfearing monarch, is necessary to the fulfilment of the Divine counsels. And the THE I.Il'E AND TIMES OF 'EA'EM/.Uf. agony of this irretrievable disaster, this sudden and complet(.' extinction of liis country's fairest lio|)es, may have been the means l)y which tiie Holy Spirit led Jeremiaii to an intenser conviction that ilh'cit modes of worshij) and coarse idolatries were not tlie only things in Judah olTensive to lahvah ; tiiat something more was needed to win back I lis favour than formal obe- dience, however rigid and exacting, to the letter of a written code of sacred law ; that the covenant of lahvah with Mis j)eoplc had an inward and eternal, not an outward and transitory significance ; and that not the letter but the spirit of the law was the thing of essential moment. Thoughts like these must have been present to the prophet's mind when he wrote (xxxi. 31 •''Vy.) : "Heboid, a time is coming, saith lahvah, when 1 will conclude with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a fresh treaty, unlike the treaty that I concluded with their fore- fathers, at the time when I took hold of their hand, to bring them out of the land of Egypt ; when they, on their part, disannulled my treaty, and I -1 disdained' them, saith lahvah. For this is the treaty that I will conclude with the house of Israel after those days [J.c. in due time], saith lahvah : I will put my Torah within them and upon their heart will I grave it ; and I will become tf) them a God, and they -they shall become to me a people." It is but a dull eye which cannot see beyond the metaphor of the covenant or treaty between lahvah and Israel ; and it is a strangely dark understanding ' Comparing Uic H(l)i(\v veil) willi tlic Ai.ihic J.ju '. i— > liniiiil, fnstidivil. I, XX., Kci7u; ■f}ixi\y]na avTwv. CI. Jcr. iii. 14. Gcsciiiiis rc.ulcrcd fuslidivit, irjccit. 22 Ph'El.lMINANY SKETCH OF \ ! that fails to pfrccivo hero anfl clsowhfTe a translucent figure of the eternal relations suhsistinj^ between Grxi and man. The error is precisely that aj^ainst which the prophets, at the.- high wat(Tniark of their inspiration, are always protesting — the universal and inv(;terate errfjr of narrowing down the ref|uirements of the Infinitely Holy, jiist and (iood, to the scrupulous ob- servance of some accef)t(.'d body of canons, enshrined in a book and duly interprrted by the laborious application of recognised legal authorities. It is so comfortable to be sure of possessing an infallible guide in so small a compass ; to be spared all further con- sideration, so long as we have paid the priestly dues, and kept the annual feasts, and carefully observed the laws of ceremonial purity I From the first, the attention of priests and people,' including the official l)rophets, would be attracted by the ritual and cere- monial precepts, rather than by the earnest moral teaching of Deuteronomy. As soon as first impressions had had time to subside, the moral and spiritual element in that noble book would begin to be ignored, or confounded with the purely external and mundane prescriptions affecting public worship and social pro- priety ; and the; interests of true religion would hardly be subserved by the formal acceptance of this code as the law of th(; state. The un regenerate heart of man would fancy that it had at last gottc.n that for which it is always craving something final — something to which it could triumphantly point, when urged by the; religious enthusiast, as tangible evidence that it was fulfilling the I)ivine law, that it was at one with lahvah, and therc'fore had a right to expect the con- tinuance of His favour and blessing. Spiritual de- velopment would be arrested ; men vrould become THE urn AND TLMES DJ- fEKEMlAU. n satisfud witli having « rt'octcd c^.Ttaiii ut the first sym|)tonis of declining power on the side of their oppressors would un- doubtedly be the signal for conspiracy and rebellion in the distant parts of tlu; loosely amalgamated emjiire. Until the death of Ashurbanipal, the last great sovereign who reigned at Nineveh, it may be assumed that josiah stood true to his fealty. It appears from certain notices in Kings and Chronicles (2 Kings xxiii. 19; 2 Chron. xxxiv. ()) that he was able to exercise authority even in the territories of the ruined kingdom of Israel. 'Jhis may have been due to the fact that he was allowed to do I retty much as he liked, so long as he |)roved an obedient vassal ; or, as is more likely, the attention of the Assyrians was diverted from the West by ■Jill: i.ii'r. .JNP rnir.s oi- jI'.ni.mi.in 25 )H of by tnnjblcs nearer lioiiw in coniK'ction with tlic S( ytliians or the Mcdes and I>ahylonians. At all events, it is (Kit to be supposed that when Josiah went out to oppose the Pharaoh at Me^iddo, he was niciiif; tlu! forces of Kgypt alone. The thin}; is intrinsically im- probable. TIk; kinjf of Judah nnisc have headed a c(.'alition of the petty Syrian states aj^ainst the couuiion enemy. It is not necessary to su|)pos(.' that tin; l*al< s- tinian principalities resisted Necho's advance, in the inter<;sts of their nominal suy.erain Assyria. I-'rom all we can feather, that empire was ncnv tott* lin^^ to its irretrievable fall, under the feebhj successois of Asliin- banipal. The ambition of Kgypt was doidjtiess a terror tcj the combined jx.-oples. 'i'he fuither results of N(.'cho's cam|)aij4n are unknown. i'Or the moment, Judah experienced a chan;.;e of niastn it all icerning the day [days of s plain Iher the single number S. and Dry; or , »» the tference ?ss the Je them irnings of his Isuch a lethod of attaining that purpose. Such a review for practical purposes might well be comprised within the limits of a single continuous composition, sucli as we find in chap. XXV., which opens with a brief retrospect of the prophet's ministry during twenty-three years (vers. 3-7), .'I'id then denounces the neglect with which his warn- ings jiave been received, and declares the approaching subjugation of all the states of Phenicia-Palestine by the king of Babylon. But the narrative itself gives not a single hint thai such was the sole object in view. Much rather does it appear from the entire context that, the crisis having at length "arrived, which Jeremiah had so long foreseen, he was now impelled to gather to- gether, with a view to their preservation, all those discourses by which he had laboured in vain to over- come the indirterence, the callousness, and the bitter antagonism of his people. These utterances of the ])ast, collected and revised in the light of successive events, and illustrated by their substantial agreement with what had actually taken place, and especially by the new danger which seemed to threaten the whole West, the rising power of Babylon, might certainly be expected to produce a powerful impression by their coincidence with the national apprehensions ; and the prophet might even hope that warnings, hitherto dis- regarded, but now visibly justified by events in course of development, would at last bring " the house of Judah" to consider seriously the evil that, in God's Providence, was evidently impending, and " return every man from his evil way," that even so late the consequences of their guilt might be turned aside. This doubtless was the immediate aim, but it does not exclude others, such as the vindication of the prophet's own claims, in startling contrast with those of the T 36 / ' A' /'.- /. IMINA R J ' Sh -/■: 7 V '// (> /' I I false prophets, who had opposed him at every step, and misled his countrymen so grievously aiul fatally. Against these and their d/. ift/r.). Jen-miah woidd know that haste was in(om|)atibl<.- with literary finish ; he wrjuld probably feel that it was ((iiially incompatible with th(? proper execution of what he had recognised as a l)ivine command. The i)rophrt hardly had all his past utterances lyin^ before him in tin forni of linislx-d compositions. " And Jeremiah commanded IJaruch, saying: I am detained (or confmed) ; I cannot enter the house of lahvah ; .so enter //lou, and read in the roll, that thou wrot<;st from my mouth, the weirds of lahvah, in the ears of the people, in the house of lahvah, upon a day of fastiiif( : anci also in the ears of all judali Cthe Jewsj, that come in (to the templej from their (several^ cities, thou shalt read them. Perchance their suppli- cation will fall before lahvah, and they will return, every one fiom his evil way ; for ^reat is the an^^er and tli(,' hot displeasure that lahvah hath s|)okrn (threatened) un4:o this jieople. And liaruch ben Neriah did accfjrding to all that Jeremiah the j)ropl)et com- maiuhul him, reading in the !>ook the wr>rds of lahvah in iahvah's house This last sentence might b regarfied as a general statement, anticipative of the detailed accoiuit that follows, as is often the case in Old Testament narratives. But I doubt the application of this well-known ex-getical device in the presc-nt instance. The verse is mf)re likely an interpolation ; unless we su|)p(jse that it refers to clivers readings of which no particulars aie given, but which preceded the memorable one described in the following verses. The injunction, " And also in the ears of all Judah that come out of their citii s thou shalt read them ! " might imply successive." readings, as the |)eoj)le Hocked into Jerusalem from time to time. Hut the grcnd occasion, t I 3« PRFJJMtNAKY SKETCir OF if not the only one, was without doubt that which stands recorded in the text. " And it came to pass in \.he fifth year of Jehoiakim ben Josiah king of Judah, in the ninth month, they proclaimed a fast before lahvah, — all the people in Jerusalem and all the people that were come out of the cities of Judah into Jerusalem. And Baruch read in the book the words of Jeremiah, in the house of lalivah, in the cell of Gemariah ben Shaphan the scribe, in the upper (inner) court, at the entry of the new gate of lahvah's house, in the ears of all the people." The dates have an important bearing upon the points we are considering. It was in the fourth year of Jehoiakim that the prophet was bidden to commit his oracles to writing. If, then, the task was not accomplished before the ninth month o( the ffth year, it is plain that it involved a good deal more than penning such a discourse as the twenty- fifth chapter. This datum, in fact, strongly favours the supposition that it was a record of his principal utterances hitherto, that Jeremiah thus undertook and accomplished. It is not at all necessary to assume that on this or any other occasion Baruch read the entire contents of the roll to his audience in the temple. We are told that he " read in the book the words of Jeremiah," that is, no doubt, some portion of the whole. And so, in the famous scene before the king, it is not said that the entire work was read, but the contrary is expressly related (ver. 23): "And when Jehudi had read three columns or four, he (the king) began to cut it with the scribe's knife, and to cast it into the fire." Three or four columns of an ordinary roll might have contained the whole of the twenty-fifth chapter ; and it must have been an unusually diminutive document, if the first three or four columns of it contained no more THE Lil'E AND TIMES OF JEREMIAH. 39 which )ass in Judah, before ill the ih into words cell of (inner) house, ave an than the seven verses of chap. xxv. {^l-^)y which declare the sin of Judah, and announce the coming of the king of Babylon. And, apart from these objections, there is no ground for the presumption that " the purport of the roll which the king burnt was [only] that the king of Babylon should * come and destroy this land.'" As the learned critic, from whom I have quoted these words, further remarks, with perfect truth, "Jeremiah had uttered many other important declarations in the course of his already long ministry." That, I grant, is true ; but then there is absolutely nothing to prove that this roll did not contain them all. Chap, xxxvi. 29, cited by the objector, is certainly not such proof. That verse simply gives the angry exclama- tion with which the king interrupted the reading of the roll, " Why hast thou written upon it, The king of Babylon shall surely come and destroy this land, and cause to cease from it man and beast ? " This may have been no more than Jehoiakim's very natural inference from some one of the many allusions to the enemy " from the north," which occur in the earlier part of the book of Jeremiah. At all events, it is evident that, whether the king of Babylon was directly mentioned or not in the portion of the roll read in his presence, the verse in question assigns, not the sole import of the entire work, but only the par- ticular point in it, which, at the existing crisis, esi)ecially roused the indignation of Jehoiakim. The 25th chapter may of course have been contained in the roll read before the king. And this may suffice to show how precarious are the assertions of the learned critic in the Encyclop. Brit, upon the subject of Jeremiah's roll. The plain truth seems to be that, perceiving the imminence of the peril \ I 40 PRELIMINARY SKETCH OE that threatened his country, the proplict was impressed with the conviction that now was the time to commit his past utterances to writing ; and that towards the end of the year, after he had formed and carried out this project, he found occasion to have his discourses read in the temple, to the crowds of rural folk who sought refuge in Jerusalem, before the advance of Nebuchadrez- zar. So Josephus understood the matter (Ant., x. 6, 2). On the approach of the Babylonians, Jehoiakim made his submission ; but only to rebel again, after three years of tribute and vassalage (2 Kings xxiv. l). Drought and failure of the crops aggravated the political troubles of the country; evils in which Jeremiah was not slow to discern the hand of an offended and alienated God. " How long," he asks (xii. 4), " shall the country mourn, and the herbage of the whole field wither ? From the wickedness of them that dwell therein the beasts and the birds perish." And in chap. xiv. we have a highly poetical description of the sufferings of the time. "Judah mourneth, and her gates languish; They sit in blacic on the ground ; And the outcry of Jerusalem hath gone up. And their nobles, they sent their menial folk for water; They came to the pits, they found no water ; They returned with their vessels empty; They were ashamed and confounded and covered their head. On account of ye ground that is chapt, For rain hath not fallen in the land, The plowmen are ashamed — they cover their head. For even the hind in the field — She calveth and forsaketh her young ; For there is no grass. And the wild asses, they stand on the scaurs ; They snuff the wind ' like jackals ; Their eyes fail, for there is no herbage." ' />. To scent food afar off, like beasts of prey. There was no occasion to alter A.V THE I.IFE AND TIMES OF JEREMfAH. 4» And then, after this graphic and almost dramatic portrayal of the sufferings of man and beast, in the blinding glare of the towns, and in the hot waterless plains, and on the bare hills, under that burning sky, whose cloudless splendours seemed to mock their misery, the prophet prays to the God of Israel. " If our misdeeds answer against us, O lahvah, work for Thy name sake ! Verily, our fallings away are many ; Towards thee we arc in fault. Hope of Israel, that savest him in time of trouble ! Why shouldst thou be as a sojourner in the laud. And as a traveller, that turncth aside to pass tht night ? Why shouldst tliou be as a man stricken dumb. As a champion that cannot save? Yet Thou art in our midst, O lahvah, And Thy name is called over us : Leave us not ! " no And again, at the end of the chapter, " Hast Thou wholly rejected Judah ? Hath Thy soul loathed Zion ? Why hast Thou smitten us, That there is no healing for us ? ' We looked for welfare, but bootlessly. For a time of healing, and behold terror ! We know, lahvah, our wickedness, the guilt of our fathers: Verily, we are in fault toward Thee ! Be not scornful, for Thy name's sake ! Dishonour not Thy glorious throne ! \i.e. Jerusalem.] Remember, break not Thy covenant with us ! Among the Vanities of the nations arc there indeed raingivers ? Or the heavens, can they yield showers ? Art not Thou He (that doeth this), lahvah our God ? And we wait for Thee, For 'tis Thou that madest all this world." In these and the like pathetic outpourings, which meet us in the later portions of the Old Testament, we I 42 PNEI.IMINAKY SKETCH OF may observe the gradual development of the dialect of stated prayer ; the beginnings and the growth of that beantiful and appropriate liturgical language in which both the synagogue and the church afterwards found so perfect an instrument for the expression of all the harmonies of worship. Prayer, both public and private, was destined to assume an increasing import- ance, and, after the destruction of temple and altar, and the forcible removal of the people to a heathen land, to become the principal means of communion with God. The evils of drought and dearth appear to have been accompanied by inroads of foreign enemies, who took advantage of the existing distress to rob and plunder at will. This serious aggravation of the national troubles is recorded in chap. xii. 7-17. There it is said, in the name of God, " I have left My house, I have cast off My heritage ; I have given the Darling of My soul into the hands of her enemies." The reason is Judah's fierce hostility to her Divine Master : " Like a lion in the forest she hath uttered a cr}^ against Me." The result of this unnatural rebellion is seen in the ravages of lawless invaders, probably nomads of the desert, always watching their opportunity, and greedy of the wealth, while disdainful of the pursuits of their civilised neighbours. It is as if all the wild beasts, that roam at large in the open country, had concerted a united attack upon the devoted land ; as if many shepherds with their innumerable flocks had eaten bare and trodden down the vineyard of the Lord. " Over all the bald crags in the wilderness freebooters (Obad. 5) are come ; for a sword of lahweh's is devouring : from land's end to land's end no flesh hath security" (ver. 12). The rapacious and heathenish hordes of THE LIFE AND TIMES OF J ER EM I A II 43 the desert, mere liuman wolves intent on ravage and slaughter, are a sword of the Lord's, for the chastise- ment of His people; just as the king of Babylon is His " servant " for the same purpose. Only ten verses of the book of Kings are occupied with the reign of Jehoiakim (2 Kings xxiii. 34- xxiv. 6) ; and when we compare that flying sketch with the allusions in Jeremiah, we cannot but keenly regret the loss of that " Book of the chronicles of the kings of Judah," to which the compiler of Kings refers as his authority. Had that work survived, many things in the prophets, which are now obscure and baffling, would have been clear and obvious. As it is, we are often obliged to be contented with surmises and probabilities, where certainty would be right welcome. In the present instance, the facts alluded to by the prophet appear to be included in the statement that the Lord sent against Jehoiakim bands of Chaldeans, and bands of Arameans, and bands of Moabites, and bands of bene Amnion. The Hebrew term implies marauding or predatory bands, rather than regular armies, and it need not be supposed that they all fell upon the country at the same time or in accordance with any preconcerted scheme. In the midst of these troubles, Jehoiakim died in the flower of his age, having reigned no more than eleven years, and being only thirty-six years old (2 Kings xxiii. 36). The prophet thus alludes to his untimely end. " Like the partridge that sitteth on eggs that she hath not laid, so is he that maketh riches, and not by right : in the midst of his days they leave him ; and in his last end he proveth a fool" (xvii. n). We have already considered the detailed condemnation of this evil king in the 22nd chapter. The prophet Habakkuk, a contemporary of Jeremiah, seems to •M rNEI. /Af/y.t A' ) ' .SA-£ TCI! i V ' have had Jehoiakim in his mind's eye, when denouneing (ii. 9) woe to one that " getteth an evil gain for his house, that he may set his nest on high, that he may escape from the hand of evil !" The alhision is to the forced labour on his n(.'W palace, and on the defences of Jerusalem, as well as to the fines and presents of money, which this oppressive ruler shamelessly ex- torted from his unhappy subjects. " The stone out of the wall," says the prophet, " crieth out; and the beam out of the woodwork answereth it." The premature death of the tyrant removed a serious obstacle from the path of Jeremiah. No longer forced to exercise a wary vigilance in avoiding the vengeance of a king whose passions determined his conduct, the prophet could now devote himself heart and soul to the work of his office. The public danger, imminent from the north, and the way to avert it, is the subject of the discourses of this period of his ministry. I lis unquenci:- able faith appears in the beautiful prayer appended to his reflexions upon the death of Jehoiakim (xvii. 12 sqf/.). We cannot mistake the tone of quiet exultation, with which he expresses his sense of the absolute righteous- ness of the catastrophe. " A throne of glory, a height higher than the first (?), (or, higher than any before) is the place of our sanctuary." Never before in the prophet's experience has the God of Israel so clearly vindicated that justice which is the inalienable attribute of His dread tribunal. For himself, the immediate result of this renewal of an activity that had been more or less suspended, was persecution and even violence. The earnestness with which he besought the people to honestly keep the law of the Sabbath, an obligation which was recog- nised in theory though disregarded in practice ; and THE I.IFR .tXf^ T/AfF.S O/' fEKF.MIML 45 his strikiiif; ilUistmtidii of tin: true relations !)et\v«'t'n lalivah and Israel as parallel to those that hold hetween the potter and the elay (chap. xvii. 19 >'/ XXV. 6 with ver. 16. And ver. 18 is virtually repeated, chap. xv. 20, which belongs to the same period)." The first part of this is an obvious inference from the narrative itself. The prophet's own statement makes it abundantly clear that his conviction of a call was accompanied by doubts and fears, which were only silenced by that faith which moves mountains. That lofty confidence in the purpose and strength of the Unseen, which has enabled weak and trembling humanity to endure martyrdom, might well be sufficient 64 THE rROrHEClES OF JEREMIAH. to nerve a young man to undertake the task of preach- ing unpopular truths, even at the risk of frequent persecution and occasional peril. But surely we need not suppose that, when Jeremiah started on his pro- phetic career, he was as one who takes a leap in the dark. Surely it is not necessary to suppose him pro- foundly ignorant of the subject-matter of prophecy in general, of the kind of success he might look for, of his own shrinking timidity and desponding tempera- ment, of ** the measure and direction of the Divine help." Had the son of Hilkiah been the first of the proph(,'ts of Israel instead of one of the latest ; had there been no prophets before him ; we might recognise some force in this criticism. As the facts lie, however, we can hardly avoid an obvious answer. With the experience of man}' notable predecessors before his eyes ; with the message of a Hosea, an Amos, a Micah, an Isaiah, graven upon his heart ; with his minute knowledge of their history, their struggles and successes, the fierce antagonisms they roused, the cruel persecutions they were called upon to face in the dis- charge of their Divine commission ; with his profound sense that nothing but th<.' good help of their God had enabled them to endure the strain of a lifelong battle ; it is not in tlie least wonderful that Jereniah should have foreseen the like experience for himself. The wonder would have been, if, with such speaking ex- amples before him, he had not anticipated "the measure and direction of the Divine help " ; if he had been ignorant " that opposition awaited him " ; if he had not already possessed a general knowledge of the "con- tents " of his own as of all prophecies. For there is a substantial unity underlying all the manifold out- pourings of the prophetic spirit. Indeed, it would »\i THE CALL ANL^ CONSF.CKATIOX. 65 seem that it is to the diversity of personal gifts, to differences of training and temperament, to the rich variety of character and circumstance, rather than to any essential contrasts in the substance and purport of prophecy itself, that the absence of monotony, the impress of individuality and originality is due, which characterises the utterances of the principal prophets. Apart from the unsatisfactory nature of the rer°ons alleged, it is very probable that this opening chapter was penned by Jeremiah as an introduction to the first collection of his prophecies, which dates from the fourth year of Jehoiakim, that is, circ. b.c. 606. In that case, it must not be forgoiten that the prophet is relating events which, as he tells us himself (chap. xxv. 3), had taken place three and twenty years ago ; and as his description is probably drawn from memory, something may be allowed for unconscious transformation of facts in the light of after experience. Still, the peculiar events that attended so marked a crisis in his life as his first consciousness of a Divine call must, in any case, have constituted, cannot but have left a deep and abiding impress upon the prophet's memory ; and there really seems to be no good reason for refusing to believe thr.t that initial experience took the form of a twofold vision seen under conditions of trance or ecstasy. At the same time, bearing in mind the Oriental passion for metaphor and imagery, we are not perhaps debarred from seeing in the whole chapter a figurative description, or rather an attempt to describe through the medium of figurative language, that which must always ultimately transcend description — the com- munion of the Divine with the human spirit. Real, most real of real facts, as that communion was and is, it can never be directly communicated in words ; it can ^^tf^^m^m^^t^mnmnt tl 66 rJ/£ PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. only be hinted and suggested through the medium of symbolic and metaphorical phraseology. Language itself, being more than half material, breaks down in the attempt to express things wholly spiritual. I shall not stop to discuss the importance of the general superscription or heading of the book, which is given in the first three verses. But before passing on, I will ask you to notice that, whereas the Hebrew text opens with the phrase Dibre Yirmeydhu (•I'^JPT. *j5'n), " The words of Jeremiah," the oldest translation we have, viz. the Septuagint, reads : " The word of God which came to Jeremiah " (to pr\iia tov Geov o iyevero eVl ' Icfjefiiav). It is possible, therefore, that the old Greek translator had a Hebrew text different from that which has come down to us, and opening with the jame formula which we find at the beginning of the older prophets Hosea, Joel, and Micah. In fact, Amos is the only prophet, besides Jeremiah, whose book begins with the phrase in question (didu nm — Aoyoi Aficaf) ; and although it is more appropriate there than here, owing to the continuation " And he said," it looks suspicious even there, when we compare Isaiah i. i, and observe how much more suitable the term "vision" (lirq) would be. It is likely that the LXX. has pre- served the original reading of Jeremiah, and that some editor of the Hebrew text altered it because of the apparent tautology with the opening of ver. 2 : "To whom the word of the Lord (LXX. tow Qeov) came in the days of Josiah." Such changes were freely made by the scribes in the days before the settlement of the O. T. canon ; changes which may occasion much perplexity to those, if any there be, who hold by the unintelligent and obsolete theory of verbal and even literal inspiration, THE CALL AND CONSECRATION. 67 um of guage wn in eneral given , I will opens "The have, which ■TO ilTL Greek t which ; j.ame e older ,mos is begins /ifim) ; here, looks h i ivision s pre- t some of the : " To in the Ibes in :anon ; those, it and ■ration, but none at all to such as recognise a Divine haiul in the facts of history/ and are content to believe that in hoi}' books, as in holy men, there is a Divine treasure in earthen vessels. The textual difference in question may servj to call our attention to the peculiar way in which tie prophets identified their w^rk with the Divine will, and their words with the Divine thoughts so that the words of an Amos or a Jeremiah were in all good faith held and believed to be self-attesting utterances of the Unseen God. The conviction which wrought in them was, in fact, identical with that which in after times moved St. Paul to affirm the high calling and inalienable dignity of the Christian ministry in those impressive words, " Let a man so account of us as of the ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mys- teries of God." Vv. 5-10, which relate how the prophet became aware that he was in future to receive revelations from above, constitute in themselves an important revelation. Under Divine influence he becomes aware of a special mission. Ere I began to fonn (mould, fashion, 1^% as the potter moulds the clay) thee in the belly ^ I knew thee ; and ere thou begannest to come forth from the womh^^ I had dedicated thee, not ** regarded thee as holy," Isa. viii. 13 ; nor perhaps " declared thee holy," as Ges. ; but ** hallowed thee," i.e. dedicated thee to God, Judg. xvii. 3; I Kipgs ix. 3; especially Lev. xxvii. 14; of money vnd houses. The pi. of consecrating priests, Ex. xxviii. 41 ; altar, Ex. xxix. 36, temple, mountain, etc.) ; perhaps also, " consecrated thee " for the dis- charge of a sacred office. Even soldiers are called ' Even in the history of the transmissi ■)n of ancient writings. .' Isa. xiiv. 24, ppD ^^V1^ xiix. 5, 1*? njri' pao ny* 6t THE rROPHFXfES OF JEREMfAH. til consecrated (D^*'J?i5D Isa. xiii. 3), as ministers of the Lord of Hosts, and probably as having been formally devoted to His service at the outset of a campaign by special solemnities of lustration and sacrifice ; while guests bidden to a sacrificial feast had to undergo a preliminary form of consecration (i Sam. xvi. 5 ; Zeph. 1. 7), to fit them for communion with Deity. With the certainty of his own Divine calling, it became clear tr ti e prophet that the choice wab not an nrhif.ra. c:i.i k ^ ; it war. the execution of a Divine purpose,, aniC'.i 'ed long, long before its realisation in time a»id ; ^ tee. The God whose foreknowledge and will directs the wiioic course of human history — whose control of events and direction of human energies is most signally evident in precise!}' those instances where men and nations are most regardless of Him, and imagine the vain thought that they are independent of Him (Isa. xxii. 1 1, xxxvii. 26) — this sovereign Being, in the development of whose eternal purposes he him- self, and every son of man was necessarily a factor, had from the first " known him," — known the individual character and capacities which would constitute his fit- ness for the special work of his life ; — and " sanctified " him ; devoted and consecrated him to the doing of it when the time of his earthly manifestation should arrive. Like others who have played a notable part in the affairs of men, Jeremiah saw with clearest vision that he was himself the embodiment in flesh and blood of a Divine idea ; he knew himself to be a deliberately planned and chosen instrument of the Divine activity. It was this seeing himself as God saw him, which constituted his difference from his fellows, who only knew their individual appetites, pleasures and interests, and wpre blinded, by their absorption in these, to the THE CALL AND CONSFXh'ATlON. 69 f the mally Til by while rgo a Zeph. ng, it lot an Divine ion in ;e and whose jies is where n, and perception of any higher reality. It was the coming to this knowledge of himself, of the meaning and purpose of his individual unity of powers and aspira- tions 111 the great universe of being, of his true relation CO God and to '7ian, which constituted the first reve- lation to Jeremiah, and which was the secret of his personal greatness. This knowledge, however, might have come to him in vain. Moments of illumination are not always accompanied by noble resolves and corresponding actions. It does not follow that, because a man sees his calling, he will at once renounce r \ -^nd pursue it. Jeremiah would not have been hun:an, i:id he not hesitated a while, when, after the 'a "arc light, came the voice, A spokesman, or Divir int.rpreter (N*33), to the nations appoint I thee. To have passing flashes of spiritual insight and heavenlj -^.jjiration is one thing ; to undertake now, in the actual present, the coi.rse of conduct which they unquestionably indicate and involve, is quite another. And so, when the hour of spiritual illumination has passed, the darkness may and often does become deeper than before. And I said, Alas ! O Lnd hdivah, behold I know not how to speak ; for I am but a youth. The words express that reluctance to begin which a sense of unpreparedness, and misgivings about the unknown future, naturally inspire. To take the first step demands decision and confidence ; but confidence and decision do not come of contemplating oneself and one's own unfitness or unpreparedness, but of steadfastly fixing our regards upon God, who will qualify us for all that He requires us t.. do. Jeremiah does not refuse to obey His call ; the very words " My Lord lahvah " — 'Adoiiai, Master, or my Master — imply a recognition 70 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. it i of the Divine right to his service ; he merely alleges a natural objection. The cry, " Who is sufficient for these things ? " rises to his lips, when the light and the glory are obscured for a moment, and the reaction and despondency natural to human weakness ensue. And lahvah said unto tnc, Say not, I am but a youth; for unto all that I send thee unto, thou shall go, and all that I command thee thou shall speak. Be not a/raid of them ; for with thee am I to rescue thee, is the utter- ance of lahvah. ** Unto all that I send thee unto " ; for he was to be no local prophet ; his messages were to be addressed to the surrounding peoples as well as to Judah ; his outlook as a seer was to comprise the entire political horizon (ver. lO, xxv. 9, 15, xlvi. sqq.). Like Moses (Ex. iv. 10), Jeremiah objects that he is no practised speaker; and this on account of youthful inexperience. The answer is that his speaking will depend not so much upon himself as upon God : " All that I command thee, thou shalt speak." The allega- tion of his youth also covers a feeling of tiniidit}', which would naturally be excited at the thought of encountering kings and princes and priests, as well as the common people, in the discharge of such a com- mission. This implication is met by the Divine assurance : " Unto all " — of whatever rank — " that I send thee unto, thou shalt go " ; and by the encourag- ing promise of Divine protection against all opposing powers : " Be not afraid of them ; for with thee am I to rescue thee." ^ And lahvah put forth His hand and touched my mouth : and lahvah said unto me. Behold I have put My words in thy mouth ! This word of the Lord, 1 For the words of this promise, cf. ver. 19 inji-.^ xv. 20, xlii. II. THE CALL AND CONSECRATION. 71 says Hitzig, is represented as a corporeal substance ; in accordance with the Oriental mode of thought and speech, which invests everything with bodily form. He refers to a passage in Samuel (2 Sam. xvii. 5) where Absalom says, " Call now Hushai the Archite, and let us hear that which is in his mouth also ; " as if what the old counsellor had to say were something solid in more senses than one. But we need not press the literal force of the language. A prophet who could write (v. 14): "Behold I am about to make my words in thy mouth fire and this people logs of wood ; and it shall devour them ; " or again (xv. 16), " Thy words were found, and I did eat them ; and Thy word became unto me a joy and my heart's delight," may also have written, " Behold I have put My words in thy mouth ! " without thereby becoming amenable to a charge of con- fusing fact with figure, metaphor with reality. Nor can I think the prophet means to say that, although, as a matter of fact, the Divine word already dwelt in him, it was now " put in his mouth," in the sense that he was henceforth to utter it. Stripped of the symbolism ot vision, the verse simply asserts that the spiritual change which came over Jeremiah at the turning point in his career was due to the immediate operation of God ; and that the chief external consequence of this inward change was that powerful preaching of Divine truth, by which he was henceforth known. The great Prophet of the Exile twice uses the phrase, " I have set My words in thy mouth" (Isa. li. 16, lix. 21) with much the same meaning as that intended by Jeremiah, but without the preceding metaphor about the Divine hand. .• See I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out and to pull down, and to destroy and to overturn; to rebuild and to replant. 7a THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. I Such, following the Hebrew punctuation, are the terms of the prophet's commission ; and they arc well worth consideration, as they set forth with all the force of prophetic idiom his own conception of the nature of that commission. First, there is the implied assertion of his own official dignity : the prophet is made a paqid (Gen. xli. 34, " ofiicerr, " set by Pharaoh over Egypt ; 2 Kings xxv. 19 a military prefect) a prefect or superintendent of the nations of the world. It is the Hebrew term corresponding to the ^TrtWoTro? of the New Testament and the Christian Church (Judg. ix. 28 ; Neh. xi. 9). And secondly, his powers are of the widest scope ; he is invested with authority over the destinies of all peoples. If it be asked in what sense it could be truly said that the ruin and renascence of nations was subject to the supervision of the prophets, the answer is obvious. The word they were authorised to declare was the word of God. But God's word is not some- thing whose efficacy is exhausted in the human utter- ance of it. God's word is an irreversible command, fulfilling itself with all the necessity of a law of nature. The thought is well expressed by a later prophet : " For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and spring; and yieldeth seed to the sower and bread to the eater : so shall My word become, that go^^th forth out of My mouth ; it shall not return to Me empty (Dp^i), but shall surely do that which I have willed, and shall carry through that for which I sent it" (or "shall prosper him whom I have sent," Isa. Iv. 10, 11). All that hap- pens is merely the selfaccomplishment of this Divine word, which is only the human aspect of the Divine will. If, therefore, the absolute dependence of the THE CAl.l. AND CONSECNATION. 73 prophets upon God for their knowledge of this word be left out of account, they appear as causes, when they are in truth but instruments, as agents when they ' are only mouthpieces. And so Ezekiel writes, " when I came to destroy the city" (Ezek. xliii. 3), meaning when I announced the Divine decree of its destruction. The truth upon which this peculiar mode of statement rests — the truth that the will of God must be and always is done in the world that God has made and is making — is a rock upon which the faith of His mes- sengers may always repose. What strength, what staying power may the Christian preacher find in dwelling upon this almost visible fact of the self-ful- filling will and word of God, though all around him he hear that will questioned, and that word disowned and denied 1 He knows — it is his supreme comfort to know — that, while his own efforts may be thwarted, that will is invincible ; that though he may fail in the conflict, that word will go on conquering and to conquer, until it shall have subdued all things unto itself. 1 1 II. THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. Jkremiah ii. l — iii. 5. THE first of the prophet's pubHc addresses is, in fact, a sermon which proceeds from an exposure of national sin to the menace of coming judgment. It falls naturally into three sections, of which the first (ii. I- 1 3) sets forth lahvah's tender love to His young bride Israel in the old times of nomadic life, when faithfulness to Him was rewarded by protection from all exter.ial foes ; and then passes on to denounce the unprecedented apostasy of a people from their God. The second (14-28) declares that if Israel has fallen a prey to her enemies, it is the result of her own infidelity to her Divine Spouse ; of her early notorious and inveterate falling away to the false gods, who are now her only resource, and that a worthless one. The third section (ii. 29-iii. 5) points to the failure of lahvah's chastisements to reclaim a people hardened in guilt, and in a self-righteousness which refpsed warning and despised reproof; affirms the futility of all human aid amid the national reverses ; and cries woe on a too late repentance. It is not difficult to fix the time of this noble and pathetic address. That which follows it, and is intimately conne.-ed with it in ii. !-iii. 5.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. 75 substance, was composed " in the days of Josiah the king " (iii. 6), so that the present one must be placed a little earlier in the same reign ; and, considering its position in the book, may very probably be assigned to the tliirteenth year of Josiah, i.e. b.c. 629, in which the prophet received his Divine call. This is the ordinary opinion ; but one critic (Knobel) refers the discourse to the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim, on account of the connexion with Egypt which is mentioned in vv. 18, 36, and the humiliation suffered at the hands of the Egyptians which is mentioned in ver. 16 ; while another (Graf) maintains that chaps, ii.-vi. were composed in the fourth year of Jehoiakini, as if the prophet had committed nothing to writing before that date — an assumption which seems to run counter to the impli- cation conveyed by his own statement, chap, xxxvi. 2. This latter critic has failed to notice the allusions in chaps, iv. 14, vi. 8, to an approaching calaniity which may be averted by national reformation, to which the people are invited ; — an invitation wholly incompatible with the prophet's attitude at that hopeless period. The series of prophecies beginning at chap. iv. 3 is certainly later in time than the discourse we are now considering ; ))ut as certainly belongs to the immediate subsequent years. It does not appear tiiat the first two of Jeremiah's addresses were called fortii by any striking event of public importance, such as the Scythian invasion. Mis new-born consciousness of the Divine call would urge the young prophet to action ; and in the present discourse we have the firstfruits of the heavenly impulse. It is a retrosp( ct of Israel's entire past and an examination of the state of things growing out of it. The prophet's attention is not yet confined to Judah ; he deplores the 76 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. rupture of the ideal relations between lahvah and His people as a whole (ii. 4; cf. iii. 6). As Hitzig has remarked, this opening address, in its finished elabora- tion, leaves the impression of a first outpouring of the heart, which sets forth at once without reserve the long score of the Divine grievances against Israel. At the same time, in its closing judgment (iii. 5), in its irony (ii. 28), in its appeals (ii. 21, 31), and its exclamations (ii. 12), it breathes an indignation stern and deep to a degree hardly characteristic of the prophet in his other discourses, but which was natural enough, as llitzig observes, in a first essay at moral criticism, a first outburst of inspired zeal. In the Hebrew text the chapter begins with the same formula as chap. i. (ver. 4) : "And there fell a word of lahvah unto me, saying." But the LXX. reads : "And he said. Thus saith the Lord," {koX elire, Tahe \eyei Kvpios:) ; a difference which is not immaterial, as it may be a trace of an older Hebrew recension of the pro- phet's work, in which this second chapter immediately followed the original superscription of the book, as given in chap. i. 1,2, from which it was afterwards separated by the insertion of the narrative of Jeremiah's call and visions ("IDKI : cf. Amos i. 2). Perhaps we maj' see another trace of the same thing in the fact that where- as chap. i. sends the prophet to the rulers and pco|)le of Judah, this chapter is in part addressed to collective Israel (ver. 4); which constitutes a formal disagreement. If the reference to Israel is not merely retrospective and rhetorical, — if it implies, as seems to be assumed, that the prophet really meant his words to affect the rejnnant of the northern kingdom as well as Judah, — we have here a valuable contemporary corroboration of the much disputed assertion of the author of ii. i-iii.5.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. 77 Chronicles, that king Josiah abolished idolatry " in the cities of Manasseh and Ephraim and Simeon even unto Naphtali, to wit, in their ruins round about" (2 Chron. xxxiv. 6), as well as in Judah and Jerusalem ; and that Manasseh and Ephraim and " the remnant of Israel" (2 Chron. xxxiv. 9, cf. 21) contributed to his restoration of the temple. These statements of the Chronicler imply that Josiah exercised authority in the ruined northern kingdom, as well as in the more fortunate south ; and so far as this first discourse of Jeremiah was actually addressed to Israel as well as to Judah, those disputed statements find in it an un- designed confirmation. However this may be, as a part of the first collection of the author's prophecies, there is little doubt that the chapter was read by Baruch to the people of Jerusalem in the fourth year of Jehoiakim (chap, xxxvi. 6). Go thou ami cry in the ears of Jerusalem : Thus hath lahvah said (or thought: This is the Divine thought concerning thee !) / have remembered for thee the kindness of thy youth, the love of thine espottsals ; thy following Me (as a bride follows her husband to his tent) in the wilderness, in a land unsown. A dedicated thing (CJ'n'P : like the high priest, on whose mitre was graven nin)? tn'p) was Israel to lahvah, His ftrstfntits of increase ; all who did eat him were held guilty, ill would conw to them, saith lahvah (vers. 2, 3). — " I have remembered for thee," i.e. in thy favour, to thy benefit — as when Nehcmiah prays, " Remember in my favour, O my God, for good, all that I have done upon this people," (Neh. v. 19) — ''the kindness" — "il^n — the warm affection of thy youth, " the love of thine espousals," or the charm of thy bridal state (Hos. ii. 15, xi. 1); the tender attachment of thine early days, of 7« THE PROPHECrRS OF JEREMIAH. thy new born national consciousness, when lahvah had chosen thee as His bride, and caMed thee to follow Ilim out of Egypt. It is the figure which we find so ela- borately developed in the pages of Hosea. The " bridal state " is the time from the Exodus to the taking of the covenant at Sinai (Ezek. xvi. 8), which was, as it were, the formal instrument of the marriage ; and Israel's young love is explained as consisting in turning her back upon " the flesh-pots of Egypt " (Ex. xvi. 3), at the call of lahvah, and following her Divine Lord into the barren steppes. This forsaking of all worldly comfort for the hard life of the desert was proof of the sincerity of Israel's early love. [The evidently original words " in the wilderness, a land unsown," are omitted by the LXX., which renders : " I remembered the mercy of thy youth, and the love of thy nuptials {reKeUoaL<^, con- summation), so that thou foUowedst the Holy One of Israel, saith lahvah."] lahvah's "remembrance" of this devotion, that is to say, the return He made for it, is described in the next verse. Israel became not " holi- ness " but a holy or hallowed thing ; a dedicated object, belonging wholly and solely to lahvah, a thing which it was sacrilege to touch ; lahvah's " firstfruits of increase " (Heb. nnxnn n*:;'N"i). This last phrase is to be explained by reference to the well-known law of the firstfruits (Ex. xxiii. 19 ; Deut. xviii, 4, xxvi. lo), according to which the first specimens of all agricul- tural produce were given to God. Israel, like the firstlings of cattle and the firstfruits of corn and wine and oil, was 7\'\7\'h Lrnp consecrated to lahweh ; and therefore none might eat of him without offending. " To eat " or devour is a term naturally used of vexing and destroy- ing a nation (x. 25, 1. 7; Deut. vii. 16, "And thou shalt cat u\ all the peoples, which Jehovah thy God is -.1 ii. i-iii.Sl THE TRUS7 TN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. 79 about to give thee ; " Isa. i. 7 ; Ps. xiv. 4, " Who eat up My people as they eat bread "). The Hteral transla- tion is, " All his eaters become guilty (or are treated as guilty, punished) ; evil cometh to them ; " and the verbs, being in the imperfect, denote what happened again and again in Israel's history ; lahvah suffered no man to do His people wrong with impunity. This, then, is the first count in the indictment against Israel, that lahvah had not been unmindful of her early devotion, but had recognised it by throwing the shield of sanctity around her, and making her inviolable against all external enemies (vv. 1-3). The prophet's complaint, as developed in the following section (vv. 4-8), is that, in spite of the goodness of lahvah, Israel has forsaken Him for idols. ^^ Hear ye the word of lahvah, O house 0/ Jacob, and ah' the clans oj the house of Israel!" All Israel is addressed, and not merely the surviving kingdom of Judah, because the apostasy had been universal. A special reference apparently made in ver. 8 to the prophets of Baal, who flourished only in the northern kingdom. We may compare the word of Amos "against the whole clan J' which lahvah "brought up from the land of Egypt" (Amos iii. i), spoken at a time when Ephraim was yet in the heyday of his power. Thus hath lahvah said. What foumd our fathers in Me, that was unjust, (7JV a single ar» jf injustice, Ps. vii. 4 ; not to be found in lahvah, I at. xxxii. 4) that they went far from Me and followed the Folly and were befooled (or the Delusion and .ere deluded) (ver. 5). The phrase is used 2 Kings x 1. 5 in the same sense ; ^'y!}'^'} " the (mere) breath," " the i< thingness " or " vanity," being a designation of the idols which Israel went after (cf. also chap, xxiii. 16; Ps. jxii. ir ; Job Ro THE PKOPIIF.CIES OF JEREMIAH. i xxvii. 12); imicli as St. Paul has written that "an idol is nothing in the world" (i Cor. viii. 4), and that, with all this boasted culture, the nations of classical antiquity * became vain," or were befooled " in their imagin- ations " (€fjuiTai(i)6r)aav=)h2T]^), "and their foolish heart was darkened" (Rom. i. 21). Both the prophet and the apostle refer to that judicial blindness which is a consequence of persistently closing the eyes to truth, and deliberately putting darkness for light and light for darkness, bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter, in com- pliance with the urgency of the flesh. For ancient Israel, the result of yielding to the seductions of foreign worship was, that "They were stultified in their best endeavours. They became false in thinking and believ- ing, in doing and forbearing, because the fundamental error pervaded the whole life of the nation and of the individual. They supposed that they knew and honoured God, but they were entirely mistaken ; they supposed they were doing I lis will, and securing their own welfare, while they were doing and securing the exact contrary" (Ilitzig). And similar consequences will always flow from attempts to serve two masters ; to gratify the lower nature, while not breaking wholly with t!ie higher. Once the soul has accepted a lower standard than the perfect law of truth, it does not stop there. The subtle corruption goes on extending its ravages farther and farther ; while the consciousness that anything is wrong becomes fainter and fainter as the deadly mischief increases, until at last the ruined spirit believes itself in perfect health, when it is, in truth, in the last stage of mortal disease. Perversion of the will and the affections leads to the perversion of the intellect. There is a profound meaning in the old saying that, Men make their gods in their own likeness. ii. i-iii.5.J rilE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF ECVrT. Si As a man is, so will God appear to him to be. "With the loving, Thou wilt shew Thyself loving ; With the perfect, Thou wilt shew Thyself perfect ; With the pure, Thou wilt shew Thyself pure ; And with the perverse, Thou wilt shew Thyself fnnvard " (Ps, xviii. 25 sq,\ Only hearts pure of all worldly taint see God in I lis purity. The rest worshij) some more or less imperfect semblance of Him, according to the varying degrees of their selfishness and sin. Ami they said not, Where is lahvah, ivho brought us up out of the hud of Egypt, that guided us in the 7vihieruess, in a laud of ivastes and holUnvs (or desert aud defde), in a hud of drought and darkness (dreariness nioSv), /";/ a hind that no nuin passed through, and zvhere no mortal dwelt (ver. 6). " I hey said not, Where is lahvah, who brought us up out of the land of Kgyjit." It is the old complaint of the prophets against Israel's black ingratitude. So, for n.--,^nce, Amos(ii. 10) had written : " Whereas I — 1 broi^ta you up from the land of Egypt, and guided you in the wilderness forty years ; " and Micah (vi. 3 sq.) : " My people, what have I done unto thee, and how have I wearied thee ? Answer against Me. For I brought thee up from the land of Egyjit, and from a house of bondmen redeemed I thee." In common gratitude, they were bound to be true to this mighty Saviour ; to enquire after lahvah, to call uj)on Him only, to do His will, and to seek His grace {cL xxi.x. 12 sq.). Yet, with characteristic fickle- nes*;, they soon forgot the fatherly guidance, which had never deserted them in the period of their nomadic wanderings in the wilds of Arabia Petraea ; a land which the prophet poetically describes as "a land of wastes and hollows" alluding probably to the rocky defiles through which they had to pass — and "a land ! i I «2 nil: rKoniEciKs oi- jekkmiah. of drought and darkness ;'" the latter an epithet of the Grave or I lades (Job x. 21), fittingly applied to that };reat lont* wilderness of the south, which Isaiah had lallcd "a fearsome land" (xxi, i ), and "a land of trouble and anguish " (xxx. 6), whither, according to the poet of Job, "The caravans go up and are lost" (vi. 1 8). And J hnniglil yon into llw ^iinhu /aiu/, to cat its fntits and its choicest things (np.lD Isa. i. 19; Gen. xlv. iS, 20, 23); and yc entered and dejiled My /and, and My domain ye made a loathsome thing ! (ver. 7). With the wilderness of the wanderings is contrasted the " land of the carnicl,'' the land of fruitful orchards and gardens, as in chap. iv. 26.; Isa. x, 18, xvi. 10, xxix. 17. This was Canaan, lahvah's own land, which He had chosen out of all countries to be Mis special dwelling-place and earthly sanctuary ; but which Israel no sooner possessed, than they began to pollute this holy land by their sins, like the guilty peoples whom they had displaced, making it thereby an abomination to lahvah (Lev. xviii. 24 sq., cf. chap. iii. 2). The priests they said not, Where is lahvah ? and they that handle the laiv, they kneiv (i.e. regarded, heeded) Me Aot ; and as for the shepherds (i.e. the king and princes, ver. 26), they rebeUed against Me, and the prophets, they prophesied l)y (through) the Baal, and them that help not {i.e. the false gods) they followed (ver. S), In the form of a climax, this verse justifies the accusation contained in the last, by giving particu- lars. The three ruling classes are successively indicted (cf. ver. 26, ch. xviii. 18). The priests, part of whose ' niD/V, !^" f^^' 'IS tlic pimctuation supgosts that the term is a compouiid, nicaiiine "shadow >>1 dciitli," is one of tin fictions of the Masorcls, hkc D^iVNa*? and D'«3<'n and n3?n in the i'aalnib. «*^^:v'fiF ii. i-iii.5.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGVVT. 83 duty was to " handle the law," i.e. explain the Torah, to instruct the people in the requirements of lahvah, by oral liadition and out of the sacred law-books, gave no sign of spiritual aspiration (cf. ver. 6) ; like the reprobate sons of Eli, " they knew not" (l Sam. ii. 12) " lahvah," that is to say, paid no heed to Ilim and His will as revealed in the book of the law ; the secular autlioritie.s, the king and his counsellors (" wise men," xviii. 18), not only sinned thus negatively, but positively revolted against the King of kings, and resisted Ills will; while the prophets went further yet in the path of guilt, apostatizing altogether from the God of Israel, and seeking inspiration from thi Phenician Baal, and following worthless idols that could give no help. There seems to be a play on the words Baal and Belial, as if Baal meant the same as Belial, "profitless," 'Svorthlcss" (cf. i Sam. ii. 12 : "Now Eli's sons were sons of Belial ; they knew not lahvah." The phrase •17VV"^5'? " they that help not," or "cannot help," suggests the term 'V!?? Belial ; which, however, may be de- rived from v3 "not," and ^y " supreme," "God," and so mean " not-God," "idol/' rather than " worthless- ness," " unprofitableness," as it is usually explained). The reference may be to the Baal-worship of Samaria, the northern capital, which was organised by Ahab, and his Tyrian queen (chap, xxiii. 13). Therefore — on account of this amazing ingratitude of your forefathers, — / zi'/// again plead (reason, argue forensically) with you (the present generation in whom their guilt repeats itself) saith lahvah^ and tvith your sons' sons (who will inherit your sins) wi// I plead. The nation is conceived as a moral unity, the cha- racteristics of which are exemplified in each successive generation. To all Israel, past, present, and future, l4 THE VKorUECIES OF JEREMIAH. lahvah will vindicate his own righteousness. For cross (the sea) io the coasts of the Cttiearis (the people of Citium in Cyprus) atui see; and to Kedar (the rude tribes of the Syrian desert) send ye, and mark well, and see li'hefher there hath arisen a ease like this. Hath a nation changed gods — alheit they are no-gods ? Yet My people hath changed his (true) glory /or that which helpeth not (or is worthless). Upheave, ye heavens (iDtJ' D*DL". a fine paronomasia), at this, and shtidde; (and) he petrified ("^^P •l^'in Ges., " be sore amazed" = DDL" \ but Ilitzig " be dry "=stilT and motionless, like syn. t^3* in I Kings xiii. 4), saith lahvah ; for two evil things hath My people done : Me they have forsaken — a Fonntain of living water — to hew them out cistenm, broken cisterns, that cannot (imnerf. = potential) hold water (Meb. the waters : generic article) (vv. 9-13). In these five verses, the apostasy of Israel from his own God is held up as a fact unique in history — unexampled and inexplicable by comparison with the doings of other nations. Whether you look westward or eastv ard, across the sea to Cyprus, or beyond Gilead to the barbarous tribes of the Cedrei (Ps. cxx. 5), nowhere will you find a heathen people that has changed its native worship for another ; and if you did find such, it would be no precedent or palliation of Israel's behaviour. The h"Jithen in adopting a new worship simply exchanges one superstition for another ; the objects of his devotion are "non-gods" (ver. 11). The heinousness and the eccentricity of Israel's conduct lies in the fact that he has bartered truth for falsehood ; he has exchanged " his Glory " — whom Amos (viii. 7) calls the Pride (A.V. Excellency) of Jacob — for a useless idol; an ob- ject which the prophet elsewhere calls " The Shame " (iii. 24, xi. 13), because it can onl^ bring shame and ii. i-iii.S.J THE TkUST IN TIIR SIIAPOW OF FAl\n\ S5 ('onfiision npdii those whose hopes clepnul upon it. The \voiuI»r of the thin^ might well be supposed to strike the pure heavens, the silent witnesses of it, with blank astonishment (rf. a similar appeal in Deut. iv. 26, xxxi. 28, xxxii. I, where the earth is added). For the evil is not single hut twofold. With the reject'on of truth goes the adoption of error ; and both are evils. Not only has Israel turned his back upon "a fountain of living waters;" he has also " hewn him out cisterns, broken cisterns, that cannot hold water." The " broken cisterns" are, of course, \\\c idols which Israel made to himself. As a cistern full of cracks and fissures dis- appoints the wayfarer, who has reckoned on finding water in il ; so the idols, having only the semblance and not the reality of life, avail their woi shippers nothing (vv. 8, 11). In Hebrew the waters of a spring are called •* living " (Gen. xxi. 19), becatise they are more refreshing and, as it were, life-giving, than the stagnant waters of pools and tanks fed by th< rains. Hence by a natural metaphor, the mouth of a righteous man, or the teaching of the wise, and the fear f^^ the Lord, are called a fountain of life (Prov. x. 11, xiii. 14, xiv. 27). "The fountain of life" is with lahvah (Ps. xxxvi. 10); nay, He is Himself the Fountain of living waters (Jer. xvii. 13); because all life, and all that ustains or quickens life, especially spiritual life, proceeds from Him. Now in Ps. xix. 8 it is said that ** The law of the Lord — or, the teaching of lahvah — is perfect, reviving (or restoring) th( soul" (cf. Lam. i. 1 1 ; Ruth iv. 15) ; and a comparison o{ Micah and Isaiah's statement that "Out of Zion will go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem " (Isa. ii. 3 ; Mic. iv. 2), with the more figurative language of Joel (iii. 18) and Zechariah (xiv. 8), who speak of "a IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET {MT-3) % ^- 1.0 11.25 116 |2^ 12.5 1^ IIIII2.2 us I.I I "^ 1^ Mm p / o^ ; 86 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. fountain going forth from the house of the Lord," and " hving wat. rs going forth from Jerusalem," suggests the inference that " the living waters," of which lahvah is the perennial fountain, are identical with His law as revealed through priests and prophets. It is easy to con- firm this suggestion by reference to the river " whose streams make glad the city of God" (Ps. xlvi. 4); to Isaiah's poetic description of the Divine teaching, of which he was himself the exponent, as " the waters of Shiloah that flow softly " (viii. 6), Shiloah being a spring that issues from the temple rock ; and to our Lord's conversation with the woman of Samaria, in which He characterises His own teaching as " living waters" (St. John iv. 10), and as "a well of waters, springing up unto eternal Life " {ibid. 14). Ts Israel a bondman, or a homeborn serf? Why hath he become a prey? Over him did young lions roar; they uttered their voice; and they made his land a waste ; his cities, they are burnt up (or thrown down), so that they are uninhabited. Yea, the so«s 0/ Noph and Tahpan(h)es, they did bruise thee on the crown. Is not this what (the thing that) thy forsaking lahvah thy God brought about for thee, at the time He was guiding thee in the way? (vv. 14-17). As lahvah's bride, as a people chosen to be His own, Israel had every reason to expect a bright and glorious career. Why was this expectation falsified by events ? But one answer was possible, in view of the immutable righteous- •ness, the eternal faithfulness of God. The ruin of Israel was Israel's own doing. It is a truth which applies to all nations, and to all individuals capable of moral agency, in all periods and places of their existence. Let no man lay his failure in this world or in the world to come at the door of the Almighty. Let none venture ii. i-iii.5.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT 87 to repeat tlie thoughtless blasphemy which charges the All-Merciful with sending frail human beings to expiate their offences in an everlasting hell ! Let none dare to say or think, God might have made it otherwise, but He would not! Oh, no; it is all a monstrous miscon- ception of the true relations of things. You and I are free to make our choice now, whatever may be the case hereafter. We may choose to obey God, or to disobey; we may seek His will, or our own. The one is the way of life ; the other, of death, and nothing can alter the facts ; they are part of the laws of the universe. Our destiny is in our own hands, to make or to mar. If we qualify ourselves for nothing better than a hell — if our daily progress leads us farther and farther from God, and nearer and nearer to the devil — then hell will be our eternal home. For God is love, and purity, and truth, and glad obedience to righteous laws ; and these things, realized and rejoiced in, are heaven. And the man that lives without these as the sovereign aims of his existence — the man whose heart's worship is centred upon something else than God — stands already on the verge of hell, which is '' the place of him that knows not (and cares not for) God." And unless we are prepared to find fault with that natural arrangement whereby like things are aggregated to like, and all physical elements gravitate towards their own kind ; I do not see how we can disparage the same law in the spiritual sphere, in virtue of which all spiritual beings are drawn to their own place, the heavenly-minded rising to the heights above, and the contrary sort sinking to the depths beneath. The precise bearing of the question (ver. 14), "Is Israel a bondman, or a homeborn slave ? " is hardly self-evident. One commentator supposes that the ' ■: 88 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH implied answer is an affirmative. Israel is a " servant," the servant, that is, the worshipper of the true God. Nay, he is more than a mere bondservant ; he occupies the favoured position of a slave born in his lord's house (cf. Abram's three hundred and eighteen young men, Gen. xiv. 14), and therefore, according to the custom of antiquity, standing on a different footing from a slave acquired by purchase. The " home " or house is taken to mean the land of Canaan, which the prophet Hosea had designated as lahvah's "house" (Hosea ix. 15, cf 3) ; and the " Israel " intended is supposed to be the existing generation born in the holy land. The double question of the prophet then amounts to this : If Israel be, as is generally admitted, the favourite bondservant of lahvah, how cc les it that his lord has not protected him against the spoiler? But, although this interpre- tation is not without force, it is rendered doubtful by the order of the words in the Hebrew, where the stress lies on the terms for "bondman" and "homeborn slave " ; and by its bold divergence from the sense conveyed by the same form of question in other pas- sages of the prophet, e.g. ver. 31 infr., where the answer expected is a negative one (cf. also chap. viii. 4, 5, xiv. 19, xlix. I. The formula is evidently characteris- tic). The point of the question seems to lie in the fact of the helplessness of persons of servile condition against occasional acts of fraud and oppression, from which neither the purchased nor the homebred slave could at all times be secure. The rights of such persons, however humane the laws affecting their ordinary status, might at times be cynically disregarded both by their masters and by others (see a notable instance, Jer. xxxiv. 8 sqq.^. Moreover, there may be a reference to the fact that slaves were always reckoned ii. l-iii.5.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT S9 e in those times as a valuable portion of the booty of conquest ; and the meaning may be that Israel's lot as a captive is as bad as if he had never known the blessings of freedom, and had simply exchanged one servitude for another by the fortune of war. The allusion is chiefly to the fallen kingdom of Ephraim. We must remember that Jeremiah is reviewing the whole past, from the outset of lahvah's special dealings with Israel. The national sins of the northern and more powerful branch had issued in utter ruin. The "young lions," the foreign invaders, had "roared against" Israel properly so called, and made havoc of the whole country (cf. iv. 7). The land was dispeopled, and became an actual haunt of lions (2 Kings xvii. 25), until Esarhaddon colonised it with a motley gathernig of foreigners (Ezra iv. 2). Judah too had suffered greatly from the Assyrian invasion in Hezekiah's time, although the last calamity had then been mercifully averted (Sanherib boasts that he stormed and destroyed forty-six strong cities, and carried off 200,000 captives, and an innumerable booty). The implication is that the evil fate of Ephraim threatens to overtake Judah ; for the same moral causes are operative, and the same Divine will, which worked in the past, is working in the present, and will continue to work in the future. The lesson of the past was plain for those who had eyes to read and hearts to understand it. Apart from this prophetic doctrine of a Providence which shapes the destinies of nations, in accordance with their moral deserts, history has no value except for the gratification of mere intellectual curiosity. Aye, and the children of Noph and Tahpanhes they bruise {? used to bruise ; are bruising: the Heb. lun^ may mean either) thee on the crown (ver. 16). This obviously 90 THE PROrHRClES OF JRREMTAH, refers to injuries inflicted by Egypt, the two royal cities of Noph or Memphis, and Tahpanhes or Daphnae, being mentioned in place of the country itself. Judah must be the sufferer, as no Egyptian attack on Ephraim is anywhere recorded ; while we do read of Shishak's invasion of the southern kingdom in the reign of Rehoboam, both in the Bible (l Kings xiv. 25), and in Shishak's own inscriptions on the walls of the temple of Amen at Karnak. But the form of the Hebrew verb seems to indicate rather some contem- porary trouble ; perhaps plundering raids by an Egyp- tian army, which about this time was besieging the Philistine stronghold of Ashdod {Herod., ii. 1 57). " The Egyptians are bruising (or crushing) thee " seems to be the sense ; and so it is given by the Jewisii commen- tator Rashi (IVXT diffringunt). Our English marginal rendering (" fed on ") follows the traditional pronuncia- tion of the Hebrew term (IVI'!), which is also the case with the Targum and the Syriac versions ; but this can hardly be right, unless we suppose that the Egyptians infesting the frontier are scornfully compared to vermin (read ^V'\\ with J. D. Mich.) of a sort which, as Herodotus tells us, the Egyptians particularly dis- liked (but cf. Mic. v. 5; Ges., depascunt, "eating down.") The A.V. of ver. 17 presents a curious mistake, which the Revisers have omitted to correct. The words should run, as I have rendered them, " Is not this" — thy present ill fortune — " the thing that thy forsaking of lahvah thy God did for thee — at the time when He was guiding thee in the way ? " The Hebrew verb does not admit of the rendering in the perf. tense, for it is an impf., nor is it a 2nd pers. fem. {j\^Ti7\ not ^SJ^m) but a 3rd. The LXX. has it rightly {ovxi> ravra ji. i-iii.5.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. 91 eiroLi^ae aoi to KaTaXiTrelv ae i/xe ;), but leaves out the next clause which specifies the time. The words, however, are probably original : for they insist, as vv. 5 and 31 insist, on the groundlessness of Israel's apostasy. lahvah had given no cause for it ; He was fulfilling His part of the covenant by "guiding them in the way." Guidance or leading is ascribed to lahvah as the true " Shepherd of Israel " (chap. xxxi. 9 ; Ps. Ixxx. i). It denotes not only the spiritual guidance which was given through the priests and prophets ; but also that external prosperity, those epochs of estab- lished power and peace and plenty, which were pre- cisely the times chosen by infatuated Israel for defection from the Divine Giver of her good things. As the prophet Hosea expresses it, ii. 8 sq., "She knew not that it was I who gave her the corn and the new wine and the oil ; and silver I multiplied unto her, and gold, which they made into the Baal. Therefore will 1 take back My corn in the time of it, and My new wine in its season, and will snatch away My wool and My flax, which were to cover her nakedness." And (chap. xiii. 6) the same prophet gives this plain account of his people's thankless revolt from their God : " When I fed them, they were sated ; sated were they, and their heart was lifted up : therefore they forgot Me." It is the thought so forcibly expressed by the minstrel of the Book of the Law (Deut. xxxii. 15), first published in the early days of Jeremiah : "And Jeshurun waxed fat and kicked; Thou waxedst fat, and gross and fleshy ! And he for- sook the God that made him, And made light of his pro- tecting Rock." And, lastly, the Chronicler has pointed the same moral of human fickleness and frailty in the case of an individual, Uzziah or Azariah, the powerful king of Judah, whose pro«iperity seduced him into pre- !! 92 THE PROPHECIES OE JEREMIAH. sumption and profanity (2 Chion. xxvi. 16): "W n he grew strong, his heart rose high, until he t ..t corruptly, and was unfaithful to lahvah his God." I need not enlarge on the perils of prosperity ; they are known by bitter experience to every Christian man. Not without good reaf^on do we pray to be delivered from evil "In all time of our wealth ;" nor was that poet least conversant with human nature who wrote that " Sweet are the uses of adversity." And now — a common formula in drawing an infer- ence and concluding an argument — what hast thou to do with the way of Egypt, to drink the tvaters of Shihor (the Black River, the Nile) ; and what hast thou to do with the way to Assyria, to drink the ivaters of the River? {par excellence, i.e., the Euphrates). Thy wickedness a/recteth tiiee, and thy 7'evolis it is that chastise thee. Know then, and see that evil and bitter is thy forsaking lahvah thy God, and thine having no dread of Me, saith the Lord lahvah Sabaoth (vv. 18, 19). And now — as the cause of all thy misfor- tunes lies in thyself — what is the use of seeking a cure for them abroad ? Egypt will prove as powerless to help thee now, as Assyria proved in the days of Ahaz (ver. 36 sq.). The Jewish people, anticipating the views of certain modern historians, made a wrcmg diagnosis of their own evil case. They traced all that they had suffered, and were yet to suffer, to the ill will of the two great Powers of their time ; and supposed that their only salvation lay in conciliating the one or the other. And as Isaiah found it necessary to cry, woe on the rebellious children, " that walk to go down into Egypt, and have not asked at My mouth ; to strengthen themselves in the strength of Pharaoh, and to trust in the shadow of Egypt ! " (Isa. xxx. i sq.), so ii. i-i.i.5 J THE TKUSF IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. 93 now, after so much experience of the futility and posi- tive harmfulness of these unequal alliances, Jeremiah has to lift his voice against the same national folly. The "young lions" of ver. 15 must denote the Assy- rians, as Egypt is expressly named in ver. 16. The figure is very appropriate, for not only was the lion a favourite subject of Assyrian sculpture ; not only do the Assyrian kings boast of their prowess as lion- hunters, while they even tamed these fierce creatures, and trained them to the chase ; but the great strength and predatory habits of the king of beasts made him a fitting symbol of that great empire whose irresistible power was founded upon and sustained by wrong and robbery. This reference makes it clear that the pro- phet is contemplating the past ; for Assyria was at this time already tottering to its fali, and the Israel of his day, Le. the surviving kingdom of Judah, had no longer any temptation to court the countenance of that decaying if not already ruined empire. The sin of Israel is an old one ; both it and its consequences belong to the past (ver. 20 compared with ver. 14) ; and the national attempts to find a remedy must be referred to the same period. Ver. 36 makes it evident that the prophet's contemporaries concerned themselves only about an Egyptian alliance. It is an interesting detail that for "the waters of Shihor," the LXX. gives " waters of Gihon " {Ti]{av\ which it will be remembered is the name of one of the four rivers of Paradise, and which appears to have been the old Hebrew name of the Nile (Ecclus. xxiv. 27 ; Jos., Ani.y i. I, 3). Shihor may be an explanatory substitute. For the rest, it is plain that the two rivers symbolize the two empires (cf Isa. viii. 7; chap. xlvi. 7) ; and the expression " to drink the waters " of them must 94 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. imply the receiving and, as it were, absorption of whatever advantage might be supposed to accrue from friendly relations with their respective countries. At the same time, a contrast seems to be intended between these earthly waters, which could only disappoint those who sought refreshment in them, and that " fountain of living waters" (ver. 13) which Israel had forsaken. The nation sought in Egypt its deliverance from self- caused evil, much as 3aul had sought guidance from witches when he knew himself deserted by the God whom by disobedience he had driven away. In seeking thus to escape the consequences of sin by cementing alliances with heathen powers, Israel added sin to sin. Hence (in ver. 19) the prophet reiterates with increased emphasis what he has already suggested by a question (ver. 17): "Thy wickedness correcteth thee, and thy revolts it is that chastise thee. Know then, and see that evil and bitter is thy forsaking of lahweh thy God, and thine having no dread of Me I " Learn from these its bitter fruits that the thing itself is bad (Read "h^ ^^'i'ns as a 2nd pers. instead of ^ri'^OB. Job xxi. 33, quoted by Hitzig, is not a real parallel ; nor can the sentence, as it stands, be rendered, " Und dass die Scheu vor mir nicht an dich kam ") ; and renounce that which its consequences declare to be an evil course, instead of aggravating the evil of it by a new act of unfaithfulness. For long ago didst thou break thy yoke, didst thou burst thy bonds, and saidst, I will not serve : Jor upon every high hill, and under each evergreen tree thou wert crouching in fornication (vv. 20-24). Such seems to be the best way of taking a verse which is far from clear as it stands in the Masoretic text. The prophet labours to bring home to his hearers a sense of the ii. i-iii.S.] THE TKUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. 95 reality of the national sin ; and he afiirms once more (vv. 5, 7) that Israel's apostasy originated long ago, in the early period of its history, and implies that the taint thus contracted is a fact which can neither be denied nor obliterated. (The punctuators of the Hebrew text, having pointed the first two verbs as in the 1st pers. instead of the 2nd feminine, were obliged, further, to suggest the reading "'''31?^ X7, " I will not transfards Me the back and not the face; but in the time of their trouble they say (begin to say), O rise and save us ! But where are thy gods that thou madest for thyself? Let them arise, if they can save thee in the time of thy trouble; for numerous as thy cities are thy gods become, O Judah ! (vv. 26-28). " The Shame " (nt^'nn) is the well-known title of opprobrium which the prophets apply to Baal. Even in the histories, which largely depend on prophelic sources, we find such substitutions as Ishbosheth for Eshbaal, the "Man of Shame" for "Baal's Man." Accordingly, the point of ver. 26 sqq. is, that as Israel has served the Shame, the idol-gods, instead of lahvah, shame has been and will be her reward : in the hour of bitter need, when she implores help from the One true God, she is put to shame by being referred back to her senseless idols. The "Israel" intended is the entire nation, as in ver. 3, and not merely the fallen kingdom of Ephraim. In ver. 28 the prophet specially addresses Judah, the surviving representative of the whole people. In the book of Judges (x. 10-14) the same idea of the attitude of lahvah towards His faithless people finds historical illustration. Oppressed by the lOO TFIE rROPHECIES OF JRREMTAH. Ammonites they "cried unto the Lord, saying, We have sinned against Thee, in that we have both forsaken our own God, and have served the Baals ; " but lahvah, after reminding them of past deliverances followed by fresh apostasies, replies : " Go, and cry unto the gods which ye have chosen ; let them save you in the time of your distress ! " Here also we hear the echoes of a pro- phetic voice. The object of such ironical utterances was by no means to deride the self-caused miseries in which Israel was involved ; but, as is evident from the sequel of the narrative in Judges, to deepen penitence and contrition, by making the people realize the full flag- rancy of their sin, and the suicidal folly of their desertions of the God whom, in times of national distress, they recognised as the only possible Saviour. In the same way and with the same, end in view, the prophetic psalmist of Deut. xxxii. represents the God of Israel as asking (ver. 37) " Where are their gods ; the Rock in which they sought refuge ? That used to eat the flesh of their sacrifices, that drank the wine of their libation ? Let them arise and help you ; let them be over you a shelter ! " The purpose is to bring home to them a conviction of the utter vanity of idol-worship ; for the poet continues : " See now that I even I am He " — the one God — " and there is no God beside Me" (with Me, sharing My sole attributes) ; " 'Tis I that kill and save alive; I have crushed, and / heal." The folly of Israel is made conspicuous, first by the expression " Saying to the wood. Thou art my father, and to the stone, Thou didst bring me forth ; " and secondly, by the statement, " Numerous as thy cities are thy gods be- come, O Judah!" In the former, we have a most interesting glimpse of the point of view of the heathen worshipper of the seventh century B.C., from which it ii. i-iii.5.] THE TRUST 11^ THE SHADOW OF RCrYPT. loi le, e 1st P it appears that by a god he meant the original, i.e.^ the real author of his own existence. Much has been written in recent years to prove that man's elementary notions of deity are of an altogether lower kind than those which find expression in the worship of a Father in heaven ; but when we see that such an idea could subsist even in connexion with the most impure nature- worships, as in Canaan, and when we observe that it was a familiar conception in the religion of Egypt several thousand years previously, we may well doubt whether this idea of an Unseen Father of our race is not as old as humanity itself. The sarcastic reference to the number of Judah's idols may remind us of what is recorded of classic Athens, in whose streets it was said to be easier to find a god than a man. The irony of the prophet's remark depends on the consideration that there is, or ought to be, safety in numbers. The impotence of the false gods could hardly be put in a stronger light in words as few as the prophet has used. In chap. xi. 13 he repeats the statement in an amplified form : " For numerous as thy cities have thy gods become, O Judah ; and numerous as the streets of Jerusalem have ye made altars for The Shame, altars for sacrificing to the Baal." From this passage, apparently, the LXX. de- rived the words which it adds here : " And according to the number of the streets of Jerusalem did they sacrifice to the (image of) Baal " {eOvov rrj BdaX). Why contend ye with Me? All of you have rebelled against Me, saitli lahvah. (LXX. '^o-e/S/jaaTe, KoX 7rdvT€^ vfjL€L<; i^vofjLi](TaTe et? e'/ze. " Ebenfalls authentisch" says Hitzig). In vain have I smitten your sons; correction they (i.e., the people; but LXX. ehe^aaOe may be correct), received not! your own 1 02 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH, sword hath eaten up your prophets^ like a destroying lion. Generation that ye are ! See the word of lalivah ! Is it a wilderness that I have been to Israel, or a land of deepest gloom ? Why have My people said, We are free ; we will come no more unto Thee ? Doth a virgin forget her ornaments, a bride her bands (or garlands, Rashi) ? yet My people hath forgotten Me days with- out number (vv. 29-32). The question, "Why contend, or dispute ye (innn), or, as the LXX. has it, talk ye (nnn) towards or about Me {h^) ? " im- plies that the people murmured at the reproaches and menaces of the prophet (ver. 26 sqq.). He answers them by denying their right to complain. Their re- bellion has been universal; no chastisement has reformed them ; lahvah has done nothing which can be alleged in excuse of their unfaithfulness ; their sin is, therefore, a portentous anomaly, for which it is impossible to find a parallel in ordinary human conduct. In vain had •' their sons," the 3'oung men of military age, fallen in battle (Amos iv. 10) ; the nation had stub- bornly refused to see in such disasters a sign of lahvah's displeasure, a token of Divine chastisement ; or rather, while recognising the wrath of heaven, they had obstinately persisted in believing in false explana- tions of its motive, and refused to admit that the purpose of it was their religious and moral amendment. And not only had the nation refused warning, and despised instruction, and defeated the purposes of the Divine discipline. They had slain their spiritual monitors, the prophets, with the sword ; the prophets who had founded upon the national disasters their rebukes of national sin, and their earnest calls to penitence and reform(i Kings xix. 10; Neh. ix. 26; St. Matt, xxiii. 37). And so when at last the long deferred judgment arrived, ii. i-iii.5.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. 103 it found a political system ready to go to pieces through the feebleness and corruption of the ruling classes ; a religious system, of which the spirit had long since evaporated, and which simply survived in the interests of a venal priesthood, and its intimate allies, who made a trade of prophecy ; and a kingdom and people ripe for destruction. At the thought of this crowning outrage, the prophet cannot restrain his indignation. " Generation that ye are I " he exclaims, " behold the word of the Lord. Is it a wilderness that I have been to Israel, or a land of deepest gloom ? " Have I been a thankless, barren soil, returning nothing for your culture ? The question is more pointed in Hebrew than in English ; for the same term (nai; 'abad) means both to till the ground, and to serve and worship God. We have thus an emphatic repetition of the remonstrance with which the address opens : lahweh has not been unmindful of Israel's service ; Israel has been persistently ungrateful for lahvah's gracious love. The cry " We are free ! " (in*i) implies that they had broken away from a painful yoke and a burdensome service (cf. ver. 20) ; the yoke being that of the Moral Law, and the service that perfect freedom which consists in subjection to Divine Reason. Thus sin always triumphs in casting away man's noblest prerogative ; in tramphng under foot that loyalty to the higher ideal which is the bridal adornment and the peculiar glory of the soul. Why hurriest thou to seek thy love ? (Lit. why dost thou make good thy way? somewhat as we say, "to make good way with a thing") (ver. 33). The key to the meaning here is supplied by ver. ^6 : Why art thou in such haste to change thy way ? In (Of) Egvpt also thou shalt be disappointed, as thou wert in Assyria. I04 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. The "way" is that which leads to Egypt; and the " love " is that apostasy from lahvah which invari- ably accompanies an alliance with foreign peoples (ver. 1 8). If you go to Assyria, you "drink the waters of the Euphrates," i.e., you are exposed to all the malign influences of the heathen land. Elsewhere, also (iv. 30), Jeremiah speaks of the foreign peoples, whose connexion Israel so anxiously courted, as her " lovers " ; and the metaphor is a common one in the prophets. The words which follow are obscure. Therefore the evil things also hast thou taught thy ways. What "evil things"? Elsewhere the term denotes misfor- tunes, calamities (Lam. iii. 38) ; and so probably here (cf. iii. 5). The sense seems to be : Thou hast done evil, and in so doing hast taught Evil to dog thy steps ! The term evil obviously suggests the two meanings of sin and the punishment of sin ; as we say, " Be sure your sin will find you out ! " Ver. 34 explains what was the special sin that followed and clung to Israel : Also, in thy skirts — the borders of thy garments — are they (the evil things) found, viz., the life-blood of innocent helpless ones; not that thou didst find them house-breaking, and so hadst excuse for slaying them (I^xod. xxii. 2) ; but for all these warnings or, because of all these apostasies and dallyings with the heathen, which they denounced (cf. iii. 7), thou slewest them. The murder of the prophets (ver. 30) was the unatoned guilt which clung to the skirts of Israel. And thou saidst. Certainly I am absolved ! Surely His wrath is turned away from me ! Behold I will reason with thee, because thou sayest, I sinned not I (ver. 35). This is what the people said when they ii. i-iii-S.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT. 105 murdered the prophets. They, and doubtless their false guides, regarded the national disasters as so much atonement for their sins. They believed that lahvah's wrath had exhausted itself in the infliction of what they had already endured, and that they were now absolved from their offences. The prophets looked at the matter differently. To them, national disasters were warnings of worse to follow, unless the people would take them in that sense, and turn from their evil ways. The people preferred to think that their account with lahvah had been balanced and settled by their mis- fortunes in war (ver. 30). Hence they slew those who never wearied of affirming the contrary, and threatening further woe, as false prophets (Deut. xviii. 20). The saying, " I sinned not ! " refers to these cruel acts ; they declared themselves guiltless in the matter of slaying the prophets, as if their blood was on their own heads. The only practical issue of the national troubles was that instead of reforming, they sought to enter into fresh alliances with the heathen, thus, from the point of view of the prophets, adding sin to sin. Why art thou in such haste to change thy way? {i.e. thy course of action, thy foreign policy). Through Egypt also shalt thou be shamed, as thou hast been shamed through Assyria. Out of this affair also (or, from him, as the country is perhaps personified as a lover of Judah ;) shalt thou go forth with thine hands upon thine head (in token of distress, 2 Sam. xiii. 19 : Tamar) ; for lahvah hath rejected the objects of thy trust, so that thou canst not be successful regarding them (vv. 36, ^y). The Egyptian alliance, like the former one with Assyria, was destined to bring nothing but shame and confusion to the Jewish people. The prophet urges past experience of similar undertakings, 10b THE PROPHECIES 01' JEREMIAH. i in the hope of deterring the poHticians of the day from their fooHsh enterprise. But all that they had learnt from the failure and loss entailed by their intrigues with one foreign power was, that it was expedient to try another. So they made • liaste to " change their way," to alter the direction of their policy from Assyria to Egypt. King Hezekiah had renounced his vassalage to Assyria, in reliance, as it would seem, on the support of Taharka, king of Egypt and Ethiopia (2 Kings xviii. /; cf. Isa. xxx. 1-5) ; and now again the nation was coquetting with the same power. As has been stated, an Egyptian force lay at this time on the con- fines of Judah, and the prophet may be referring to friendly advances of the Jewish princes towards its leaders. In the Hebrew, ch. iii. opens with the word "saying" (lbs?). No real parallel to this can be found else- where, and the Sept. and Syriac omit the term. Whether we follow these ancient authorities, and do the same, or whether we prefer to suppose that the prophet originally wrote, as usually, " And the Word of lahvah came unto me, saying," will not make much difference. One thing is clear ; the division of the chapters is in this instance erroneous, for the short section, iii. 1-5, obviously belongs to and completes the argument of ch. ii. The state- ment of ver. 37, that Israel will not prosper in the negotiations with Egypt, is justified in iii. I by the consideration that prosperity is an outcome of the Divine favour, which Israel has forfeited. The rejec- tion of Israel's "confidences" implies the rejection of the people themselves (vii. 29). If a man divorce his ivife and she go away from him (WND de chez lui), and become another man's, doth he (her former husband) ii. i-iii.S] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGVrr. 107 return unto her again ? Would not that land be utterly polluted? It is the case contemplated in the Book of the Law (Deut. xxiv. 1-4), the supposition being that the second husband may divorce the woman, or thaL the bond between them may be dissolved by his death. In either contingency, the law forbade reunion with the former husband, as "abomination before lahvah;" and David's treatment of his ten wives, who had been publicly wedded by his rebel son Absalom, proves the antiquity of the usage in this respect (2 Sam. xx. 3). The relation of Israel to lahvah is the relation to her former husband of the divorced wife who has married another. If anything it is worse. And thou, thou hast played the harlot with many paramours ; and shalt thou return unto Me ? saith lahvah. The very idea of it is rejected with indignation. The Author of the law will not so flagrantly break the law. (With the Heb. form of the question, cf. the Latin use of the infin. " Mene incepto desistere victam ? ") The details of the unfaithfulness of Israel — the proofs that she belongs to others and not to lahvah — are glaringly obvious ; contradiction is impossible. Lift up thine eyes upon the bare fells, and see ! cries the prophet/ where hast thou not been forced ? By the roadsides thou safest for them like a Bedawi in the wilderness, and thou pollutedst the land with thy whoredom and with thine m/(Hos. vi. 13). On every hill-top the evidence of Judah's sinful dalliance with idols was visible ; in her eagerness to consort with the false gods, the objects of her infatuation, she was like a courtesan looking out for paramours by the wayside (Gen, xxxviii. 14), or an Arab lying in wait for the unwary traveller in the desert. (Tliere may be a reference to the artificial baniuth to8 rilE PROPHECIES OE JEPEMlAir. or " high places " erected at the top of the streets, on which the wretched women, consecrated to the shameful rites of the Canaanite goddess Ashtoreth, were wont to sit plying their trade of temptation : 2 Kings xxiii. 8 ; Ezek. xvi. 25). We must never forget that, repulsive and farfetched as these comparisons of an apostate people to a sinful woman may seem to us, the ideas and customs of the time made them perfectly apposite. The worship of the gods of Canaan involved the prac- tice of the foulest impurities ; and by her revolt from lahvah, her lord and husband, according to the common Semitic conception of the relation between a people and their god, Israel became a harlot in fact as well as in figure. The land was polluted with her "whoredoms," i.e., her worship of the false gods, and her practice of their vile rites ; and with her " evil," as instanced above (ii. 30, 35) in the murder of those who protested against these things (Num. xxxv. 33 ; Ps. cvi. 38). As a punishment for these grave offences, the sJunvers were imthholden, and the spring rains fell not; but the merciful purpose of this Divine chastisement was not fulfilled ; the people were not stirred to penitence, but rather hardened in their sins : but thou hadst a harlofs forehead ; thou refusedst to to be made ashamed ! And now the day of grace is past, and repentance comes too late. Hast thoii not but now called -unto Me, My Father ! Friend of my youth wcrt Thou? Will He retain His wrath for ever ? or keep it ivithout end? (vv. 3, 5). The reference ap- pears to be to the external reforms accomplished by the young king Josiah in his twelfth year — the year previous to the utterance of this prophecy; when, as we read in 2 Chron. xxxiv. 3, " He began to purge Judah and Jerusalem from tlie high places, and the ii. i-iii.5.1 THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGV/'T 100 r e Aslurim, aiul the carvcii images, ami the molten images." To all appearance, it was a return of the nation to its old allegiance ; the return of the rebellious child to its father, of the erring wife to the husband of her youth. By those two sacred names which in her inexcusable fickleness and ingratitude she had lavished upon stocks and stones, Israel now seemed to be in- voking the relenting compassion of her alienated God (ii. 2/, ii. 2). But apart from the doubt attaching to the reality of reformations to order, carried out in obedience to a royal decree ; apart from the question whether outward changes so easily and rapidly accom- plished, in accordance with the will of an absolute monarch, were accompanied by any tokens of a genuine national repentance ; the sin of Israel had gone too far, and been persisted in too long, for its terrible con- sequences to be averted. Behold — it is the closing sentence of the address ; a sentence fraught with despair, and the certainty of coming ruin ; — Behold, thou hast planned and accomplished the evil (ii. 33) ; and thou hast prevailed I The approaches of the people are met by the assurance that their own plans and doings, rather than lahvah's wrath, are the direct cause of past and prospective adversity ; ill doing is the mother of ill fortune. Israel inferred from her troubles that God was angry with her ; and she is informed by His prophet that, had she been bent on bringing those troubles about, she could not have chosen any other line of conduct than that which she had actually pursued. The term " evils " again sug- gests both the false and impure worships, and their calamitous moral consequences. Against the will of lahvah, His people had wrought for its own ruin, and had prevailed. rtfeiiTtflm 110 Tirr. rKOrilEriES of JEREMfAII, And now let US take a farewell look at the disrourso in its entirety. Beginning at the beginning, the dawn of his people's life as a nation, the young prophet declares that in her early days, in the old times of simple piety and the uncorrupted life of the desert, Israel had been true to her God ; and her devotion to her Divine spouse had been rewarded by guidance and protection. " Israel was a thing consecrated to lahvah; whoever eat of it was held guilty, and evil came upon them" (ii. 1-3). This happy state of mutual love and trust between the Lord and His people began to change with the great change in outward circumstances involved in their conquest of Canaan and settlement among the aboriginal inhabitants as the ruling race. With the lands and cities of the conquered, the conquerors soon learned to adopt also their customs of worship, and the licentious merriment of their sacrifices and festivals. Gradually they lost al' sense of any radical distinction between the God of Isrc^cl and the local deities at whose ancient sanctuaries they now worshipped Him. Soon they forgot their debt to lahvah; His gracious and long- continued guidance in the Arabian steppes, and the loving care which had established them in the goodly land of orchards and vineyards and cornfields. The priests ceased to care about ascertaining and declaring His will; the princes openly broke His laws; and the popular prophets spoke in the name of the popular Baals (vv. 4-8). There was something peculiarly strange and startling in this general desertion of the national God and Deliverer ; it was unparalleled among the surrounding heathen races. They were faithful to gods that were no gods ; Israel actually exchanged her Glory, the living source of ail her strength and well- being, for a useless, helpless idol. Her behaviour was li. i-iii.5.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT, m fy le g [O \v as cr.izy as if she had prtferrcd a cistern, all cracks and fissures, that could not possibly hold water, to a never- failing fountain of sweet spring water (vv. 9-13). The consequences were only too plain to such as had eyes to see. Israel, the servant, the favoured slave of lahvah, was robbed and spoiled. The "lions," the fierce and rapacious warriors of Assyria had ravaged his land, and ruined his cities ; while Kgypt was proving but a treacherous friend, pilfering and plun- dering on the borders of Judah. It was all Israel's own doing; forsaking his God, he had forfeited the Divine protection. It was his own apostasy, his own frequent and flagrant revolts which were punishing him thus. Vain, therefore, utterly vain were his en- deavours to find deliverance from trouble in an alliance with the great heathen powers of South or North (vv. 14-19). Rebellion was no new feature in the national history. No ; for of old the people had broken the yoke of lahvah, and burst the bonds of His ordi- nances, and said, I will not serve ! and on every high hill, and under every evergreen tree, Israel had bowed down to the Baalim of Canaan, in spiritual adultery from her Divine Lord and Husband. The change was a portent ; the noble vine-shoot had degenerated into a worthless wilding (vv. 20-21). The sin of Israel was inveterate and ingrained ; nothing could wash out the stain of it. Denial of her guilt was futile ; the dreadful rites in the valley of Hinnom witnessed against her. Her passion for the foreign worships was as insatiable and headstrong as the fierce lust of the camel or the wild ass. To protests and warnings her sole reply was : " It is in vain ! I love the strangers, and them will I follow ! " The outcome of all this wilful apostasy was the shame of defeat and disaster, the humiliation 112 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH n of disappointment, when the helplessness of the stocks and stones, which had supplanted her Heavenly Father, was demonstrated by the course of events. Then she bethought her of the God she had so lightly forsaken, only to hear in His silence a bitterly ironical reference to the multitude of her helpers, the gods of her own creation. The national reverses failed of the effect intended in the counsels of Providence. Her sons had fallen in battle ; but instead of repenting of her evil ways, she slew the faithful prophets who warned her of the consequences of her misd( eds (vv. 20-30). It was the crowning sin ; the cup of her iniquity was full <^o overflowing. Indignant at the memory of it, the prophet once more insists that the national crimes are what has put misfortune on the track of the nation ; and chiefly, this heinous one of killing the messengers of God like housebreakers caught in the act ; and then aggravating their guilt by self-justification, and by resorting to Egypt for that help, which they despaired of obtaining from an outraged God. All such negotia- tions, past or present, were doomed to failure before- hand ; the Divine sentence had gone forth, and it was idle to contend against it (vv. 31-37). idle also it was to indulge in hopes of the restoration of Diyine favour. Just as it was not open to a discarded wife to return to her husband after living with another; so might not Israel be received back into her former position of the Bride of Heaven, after she had " played the harlot with many lovers." Doubtless of late she had given tokens of remembering her forgotten Lord, calling upon the Father who had been the guide of her youth, and deprecating the continuance of His wrath. But the time was long since past, when it was possible to avert the evil consequences of her misdoings. She had, as ii. i-iii.S.] THE TRUST IN THE SHADOW OF EGYPT 113 it were, steadily purposed and wrought out her own evils; both her sins and her sufferings past and to come : the iron sequence could not be broken ; the ruin she had courted lay before her in the near future : she had "prevailed." All efforts such as she was now making to stave it off were like a deathbed repentance ; in the nature of things, they could not annihilate the past, nor undo what had been done, nor substitute the fruit of holiness for the fruit of sin, the reward of faith- fulness and purity for the wages oi' worldhness, sensu- ality, and forgetfulness of God. Thus the discourse starts with impeachment, and ends with irreversible doom. Its tone is comminatory throughout ; nowhere do we hear, as in other prophecies, the promise of pardon in return for penitence. Such preaching was necessary, if the nation was to be brought to a due sense of its evil ; and the reformation of the eighteenth of Josiah, which was undoubtedly accompanied by a considerable amount of genuine repentance among the governing classes, was in all likelihood furthered by this and similar prophetic orations.' ' Perhaps, too, the immediate object of the prophet was attained, which was, as Ewald thinks, to dissuade the people from alliance with Psammitichus, the vigorous monarch who was then reviving the power and ambition of Egypt. Jeremiah dreaded the effects of Egyptian influence upon the religion and morals of Judah. Ewald notes the significant absence of all reference to the enemy from the north, who appears in all the later pieces. III. ISRAEL AND JUDAH : A CONTRAST. Jeremiah iii. 6-iv. 2. THE first address of our prophet was throughout of a sombre cast, and the darkness of its close was not relieved by a single ray of hope. It was essentially a comminatory discourse, the purpose of it being to rouse a sinful nation to the sense of its peril, by a faithful picture of its actual condition, which was so different from what it was popularly supposed to be. The veil is torn aside ; the real relations between Israel and his God are exposed to view ; and it is seen that the inevitable goal of persistence in the course which has brought partial disasters in the past, is certain destruction in the imminent future. It is implied, but not said, that the only thing that can save the nation is a complete reversal of policies hitherto pursued, in Church and State and private life ; and it is apparently taken for granted that the thing implied is no longer possible. The last word of the discourse was : " Thou hast purposed and performed the evils, and thou hast conquered" (iii. 5). The address before us forms a striking contrast to this dark picture. It opens a door of hope for the penitent. The heart of the prophet cannot rest in the thought of the utter rejection of his people; the harsh and dreary announcement that his iii.6-iv.2.] ISRAEL AND JUDAH: A CONTRAST. H5 people's woes are self-caused cannot be his last word. " His anger was only love provoked to distraction ; here it has come to itself again," and holds out an offer of grace first to that part of the whole nation which needs it most, the fallen kingdom of Ephraim, and then to the entire people. The all Israel of the former discourse is here divided into its two sections, which are contrasted with each other, and then again considered as a united nation. This feature distin- guishes the piece from that which begins chap. iv. 3, and which is addressed to " Judah and Jerusalem " rather than to Israel and Judah, like the one before us. An outline of the discourse may be given thus. It is shown that Judah has not taken warning by lahvah's rejection of the sister kingdom (6-io); and that Ephraim may be pronounced less guilty than Judah, seeing that she had witnessed no such signal example of the Divine vengeance on hardened apostasy. She is, therefore, invited to repent and return to her alienated God, which will involve a return from exile to her own land ; and the promise is given of the reunion of the two peoples in a restored Theocracy, having its centre in Mount Zion (11-19). All Israel has rebelled against God; but the prophet hears the cry of universal penitence and supplication ascending to heaven ; and lahvah's gracious answer of acceptance (iii. 20-iv. 2). The opening section depicts the sin which had brought ruin on Israel, and Judah's readiness in fol- lowing her example, and refusal to take warning by her fate. This twofold sin is aggravated by an in- sincere repentance. And lahvah said unto mc, in the days of Josiah the king, Sawest thou what the Turncoat or Recreant Israel did? she would go up every high Ii6 THE PIWJ'IIECIES or JEREMIAU. hill, and under every evergreen tree, and play the harlot there. And methought that after doing all this she would return to Me; hut she returned not; and the Traitress, her sister Judah saw it. And / ' saw that when for the very reason that she, the Turncoat Israel, had committed adultery, I had put her away, and given her her bill of divorce, the '^raitress Judah, her sister, was not afraid, hut she too went off and played the harlot. And so, through the cry (cf. Gen. iv. lO, xviii. 20 sy.) of her harlotry (or read 21 for hp, script, defect, through her manifold or abounding harlotry) she polluted the land (tl^nril ver. 2), iyi that she committed adultery with the Stone and with the Stock. And yet though she was involved in all this guilt (lit. and even in all this. Perhaps the sin and the penalties of it are identified ; and the meaning is : And yet for all this liability : cf. Isa. v. 25), the Traitress Judah returned not unto Me with all her heart (with a whole or un- divided heart, with entire sincerity'^) but in falsehood saith lahvah. The example of the northern kingdom is represented as a powerful Influence for evil upon Judah. This was only natural ; for although from the point of view of religious development Judah is incom- parably the more important of the sister kingdoms; the exact contrary is the case as regards political power and predominance. Under strong kings like Omri and Ahab, or again, Jeroboam II., Ephraim was able to assert itself as a first-rate power among the surround- • ' She saw : Pcsh. This may be right. And tlu; Traitress, her sister Judah, saw it : yea, saw thai even because the Turncoat Israel had committed adultery, I put her away .... And yet the Traitress Judah, her sister, ivas not afraid, etc. 2 I Kings ii. 4, nnN3 = D;;ii>-^23 ii.6.iv. 2.] fSKAFJ. ANI> JlfDAH: A COMTRAST. 117 r / ing principalities ; and in the case of Athaliaii, we have a conspicuous instance ofthe manner in which Canaanite idolatry might be propagat('d from Israel to Judah. The prophet declares that the sin of Judah was aggra- vated by the fact that she had witnessed the ruin of Israel, and yet persisted in the same evil courses of which that ruin was the result. She sinned against light. The fall of Ephraim had verified the predictions of her prophets ; yet " she- was not afraid," but went on adding to the score of her own offences, and polluting the land with her unfaithfulness to her Divine Spouse. The idea that the very soil of her country was defiled by Judah's idolatry may be illustrated by reference to the well-known words of Ps. cvi. 38 : " They shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and their daughters whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan ; and the land was defiled with the bloodshed." We may also remember FJohim's word to Cain : " The voice of thy brother's blood is crying unto Me from the ground!" (Cen. iv. loj. As lahvah's special dwelling- place, moreover, the land of Israel was holy ; and foreign rites desecrated and profaned it, and made it offensive in His sight. The pollution of it cried to heaven for vengeance on those who had caused it. To such a state had Judah brought her own land, and the very city of the sanctuary; "and yet in all this" — amid this accumulation of sins and liabilities — she turned not to her Lord with her whole heart. The reforms set on foot in the twelfth year of Josiah were but superficial and half-hearted ; the people merely acquiesced in them, at the dictation of the court, and gave no sign of any inward change or deep-wrought repentance. The semblance without the reality of sorrow for sin is but a mockery of heaven, and a heinous ii8 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. aggravation of guilt. Hence the sin of Judah was of a deeper dye than that which had destroyed Israel. And lahvah said unto me, The Turncoat or Recreant Israel hath proven herself more righteous than the Traitress Judah. Who could doubt it, considering that almost all the prophets had borne their witness in Judah ; and that, in imitating her sister's idolatry, she had resolutely closed her eyes to the light of truth and reason ? On this ground, that Israel has sinned less, and suffered more, the prophet is bidden to hold out to her the hope of Divine mercy. The greatness of her ruin, as well as the lapse of years since the fatal catastrophe, might tend to diminish in the prophet's mind the impression of her guilt ; and his patriotic yearning for the restora- tion of the banished Ten Tribes, who, after all, were the near kindred of Judah, as well as the thought that they had borne their punishment, and thus atoned for their sin (Isa. xl. 2), might cooperate with the desire of kindling in his own countrymen a noble rivalry of repentance, in moving the prophet to obey the impulse which urged him to address himself to Israel. Go thou, and cry these words northward (toward the deso- late land of Ephraim), and say: Return, Turncoat or Recreant Israel, saith lahvah; I will not let My counten- ance fall at the sight of you (lit. against you, cf. Gen. iv. 5) ; for I am loving, saith lahvah, I keep not anger for ever. Only recognise thy guilt, that thou hast rebelled against lahvah thy God, and hast scattered (or lavished: Ps. cxii. 9) thy ways to the strangers (hast gone now in this direction, now in that, wor- shipping first one idol and then another ; cf. ii. 23 ; and so, as it were, dividing up and dispersing thy devotion) under every evergreen tree; but My voice ye have not obeyed, saith lahvah. The invitation, h I lii.6.iv.2.] ISRAEL AND JUDAH'. A CONTRAST. iig i " Return Apostate Israel ! " — r'* htj'D nair* ' —contains a play on words, which seems to suggest that the exile of the Ten Tribes was voluntary, or self-imposed ; as if, when they turned their backs upon their true God, they had deliberately made choice of the inevitable consequence of that rebellion, and made up their minds to abandon their native land. So close is the connexion, in the prophet's view, between the misfortunes of his people and their sins. Return, ye apostate children (again there is a play on words — D''33VJ' D''33 niK^ — Turn hack, ye back-turning sons, or ye sons that turn the hack to Me) saith lahvali; for it was I that iveddcd you (ver. 14), and am, therefore, your proper lord. The expression is not stranger than that which the great prophet of the Return addresses to Zion : " Thy sons shall marry thee." But perhaps we should rather compare another passage of the book of Isaiah, where it is said : ** lahvah, our God ! other lords beside Thee have had dominion over us" (-IJ-I?^? Isa. xxvi. 13), and render: For it is I that will be your lord ; or perhaps, For it is I that have mastered you, and put down your rebellion by chastisements ; and I will take you, one of a city and two oj a clan, and will bring you to Zion. As a " city " is elsewhere spoken of as a " thousand " (Mic. v. i), and a "thousand" (fi^N) is synonymous with a " clan " (nnaK>tt), as providing a thousand warriors in the national militia ; it is clear that the promise is that one or two representatives of each township in Israel shall be restored from exile to the land of their fathers. In other words, we have here Isaiah's doc- \ce 'As if "Turn back, back-turning Israel!" i.e. Thou that turnedst th}' back upon lahvah, and, therefore, upon His pleasant land. 120 THE PROPflRCIES OF JE REM I AIL trine of the lemnant, which he calls a "tenth'" (Isa. vi. 13), and of which he declared that "the survivors of the house of Judah that remain, shall again take root downwards, and bear fruit upwards" (Isa. xxxvii. 31). And as Zion is the goal of the returning exiles, we may see, as doubtless the prophets saw, a kind of anticipation and foreshadowing of the future in the few scattered members of the northern tribes of Asher, Manasseh and Zebulun, who " humbled themselves," and accepted Ilezekiah's invitation to the passover (2 Chron. xxx. 11, 18); and, again, in the authority which Josiah is said to have exercised in the land of the Ten Tribes (2 Chron. xxxiv. 6 ; cf 9). We must bear in mind that the prophets do not contemplate the restoration of every individual of the entire nation ; but rather the return of a chosen few, a kind of " firstfriiits " of Israel, who are to be a "holy seed" (Isa. vi. 13), from which the power of the Supreme will again build up th(.' entire people according to its ancient divisions. So the holy Apostle in the Kevelation hears that twelve thousand of each tribe are sealed as servants of God (Rev. vii.). The happy time of restoration will also be a time of reunion. The estranged tribes will return to their old allegiance. This is implied by the promise, " I will bring you to Zion," and by that of the next verse : And I will give you shepherds after My own heart ; and they shall shepherd you with kno7vledgc and wis- dom. Obviously, kings of the house of David are meant ; the good shepherds of the future are contrasted with the " rebellious " ones of the past (ii. 8). It is the promise of Isaiah (i. 26) : " A A I will restore thy judges as at the first, and thy counsellors as at the beginning." In this connexion, we may recall the fact iii.6-iv.2l ISRAEL AND JUDAH: A CONTRAST. 121 that the original scliisiii in Israel was brought about by the folly of evil shepherds. The coming King will resemble not Rehoboam but David. Nor is this all ; for // shall come to pass, when ye multiply and become f ruitf III in the land, in those days, saifh /ahvah, men shall not say any more, The crk of the covenant of I ahvah, (or, as LXX., of the Holy One of Israel ; nor shall it (the ark) come to mind ; nor shall men remember it, nor miss it; nor shall it be made any more (pointing i^]^}^!'. although the verb may be im- personal. 1 do not understand why Ilitzig asserts " Man ivird keine andere machen (Movers) oder ; sie wird nicht wieder gemacht (Ew., Graf) als wilre nicht von der geschichtlichen Lade die Red'?, sondern von ihr begrifflich, konnen die Worte nicht bedeuten." But cf. Exod. XXV. lO; Gen. vi. 14; where the same verb riK*!; is used. Perhaps, however, the rendering of C. B. Michaelis, which he prefers, is more in accordance with what precedes : nor shall all that be done any mm'e, Gen. xxix. 26, xli. 34. But IpD does not mean nach- forschen : cf. I Sam. xx. 6, xxv. 15). In that time men mil call Jerusalem the throne of lahvah ; and all the nations will gather into it (Gen. i. 9), for the name of lahvah [_at Jerusalem : LXX. om.] ; and they (the heathen) will no longer follow the stubbornness of their evil heart (vii. 24 ; Deut. xxix, 19). In the new Theocracy, the true kingdom of God, the ancient symbol of the Divine presence will be forgotten in the realization of that presence. The institution of the New Covenant will be characterized by an immediate and personal knowledge of lahvah in the hearts of all His people (xxxi. 31 sq.). The small object in which past generations had loved to recognise the earthly throne of the God of Israel, will be replaced by Jerusalem 122 THE PKOPHRCrES OF JEREMFAH. itself, the Holy City, \mA lucrily of Jiidah, nor of Jiulali and Israel, but of the world. Thither will all the nations resort "to the name of lahvah ; " ceasing henceforth "to follow the hardness Cor callf)nsness) of their own evil heart." That the mon; degraded kinds of heathen- ism have a hardening effect upon the heart ; and that the cruel and impure worships of Canaan especially tended to blunt the finer sensibilities, to enfeeble the natural instincts of humanity and justice, and to confuse the sense of right and wrong, is be^yond question. Only a heart rendered callous by custom, and stubbornly deaf to the pleadings of natural pity, could find genuine pleasure in the merciless rites of the Moiech-worship ; and they who ceased to follow these inhuman supersti- tions, and sought light and guidance from the God of Israel, nu"ght well be said to have ceased " to walk after the hardness of their own evil heart." * The more repulsive features of heathenism chime in too well with the worst and most savage impulses of our nature ; they exhibit too close a conformity with the suggestions and demands of selfish appetite ; they humour and encourage the darkest passions far too directly and decidedly, to allow us to regard as plausible any theory of their origin and permanence which does not recognise in them at once a cause and an effect of human depravity (cf. Rom. i.). The repulsiveness of much that was associated with the heathenism with which they were best acquainted, did not hinder the prophets of Israel from taking a deep spiritual interest in those who practised and were enslaved by it. Indeed, what has been called the univercalism of the Hebrew seers — their emancipation ' Cf. also the Arabic ' * pravus, term. "" A pravilof!, with the Hebrew iii.6-iv2.1 rSKAFJ. AND JUDAIf: A CONTRAST, «23 in this respect from all local and national limits and prejudices — is one of the clearest proofs of their divine mission. Jeremiah only reiterates what Mirah and Isaiah had preached before him ; that " in the latt(;r days the mountain of lahvah's House shall be estab- lished as the chief of mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all the nations will flow unto it " (Isa. ii. 2). In ch. xvi. 19 .s^. our prophet thus expresses himself upon the same topic. " lahvah, my strength and my stronghold, and my refuge in the day of dis- tress ! unto Thee shall nations come from the ends of the earth, and shall say : Our forefathers inherited nought but a lie, vanity, and things amr)ng which is no helper. Shall a man make him gods, when they are no gods ? " How largely this particular aspiration of the prophets of the seventh and eighth centuries n.c. has since been fulfilled in the course of the ages is a matter of history. The religion which was theirs has, in the new shape given it by our Lord and His Apostles, become the religion of one heathen people after another, until at this day it is the faith professed, not only in the land of its origin, but by the leading nations of the world. So mighty a fulfilment of hopes, which at the time of their first conception and utterance could only be regarded as the dreams of enthusiastic visionaries, justifies those who behold and realize it in the joyful belief that the progress of true religion has not been maintained for six and twenty centuric.s to be arrested now; and that these old-world aspirations are destined to receive a fulness of illustration in the triumphs of the future, in the light of which the brightest glories of the past will pale and fade away. The prophet does not say, with a prophet of the New Covenant, that all hrael shall be saved (Rom. xi. 26). 1S4 THE Ph'orifFciEs or rPRFMrAir. We iii.'iy, lu. never, fairly intcr|)ret the latter of the true Israel, the rvmuaut according io the rlrctiou of irrnrc, rather than o^ Israel accorditifr to the Jlrs/i, and so both will be at one, and both at variance with the unspiritual doctrine of the Talmud, that A/i fsivc/, irrespective of moral ciualifications, will have a portion in the world to come, on account of the surpassing merits of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and even of Abraham alone (of. St. Matt. iii. 9; St. John viii. 33). The reference to the ark of the covenant in the sixteenth verse is remarkable upon several grounds. This sacred symbol is not mentioned among the spoils which Nebuzaradan (Nabu-zir-iddin) took from the t<'mple (Hi. 17 sqq.)\ nor is it specified among the trea- sures appropriated by Nebuchadrezzar at the surrender of Jehoiachin. The words of Jeremiah prove that it cannot be included among " the vessels of gold " which the Babylonian conqueror "cut in pieces" (2 Kings xxiv. 13). We learn two facts about the ark from the present passage : (l) that it no longer existed in the days of the prophet ; (2) that people remembered it with regret, though they did not venture to replace the lost original by a new substitute. It may well have been destroyed by Manasseh, the king who did his utmost to abolish the religion of lahv. ' However that may be, the point of the prophet's allusion consists in the thought that in the glorious times of Messianic rule the idea of holiness will cease to be attached to things, for it will be realized in persons ; the symbol will become obsolete, and its name and memory will disappear from the minds and affections of men, because the fact symbolized will be universally felt and per- ceived to be a present and self-evident truth. In that great epoch of Israel's reconciliation, all nations will Iii.6-iv.2.1 ISh'AF.r ANP JUPA/f: A CON/'KAST. 125 recognise in Jerusalem tlw f/iroHc of lahvali, the centre of light and source of spiritual trutli ; tin- Holy City of th(.' worlel. is it the earthly or the heavenly JtTUsaU'm that is meant ? It would seem, the former only was present to the consciousness of the prophet, for he concludes his beautiful interlude of promise with the words : In those days nnll the house of Jmiah ivalk hrsuie the house of Israel ; and they luill come together from the land of the North [and from all the lands: LXX add. cf. xvi. 1 5 J unto the land that I caused your fathers to possess. Like Isaiah (xi. 12 sqq.) and other prophets his predecessors, Jeremiah forecasts for the whole repentant and united nation a reinstatemcnc in their ancient temporal rights, in the pleasant land from which they had been so cruelly banished for so many weary years. "The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." If, when we look at the whole course of subsequent events, when we review the history of the Return and of the narrow religious commonwealth which was at last, after many bitter struggles, established on mount Sion ; when we consider the form which the religion of lahvah assumed in the hands of the priestly caste, and the half-religious, half-political sects, whose intrigues and conflicts for power constitute almost all we know of their period ; when we reflect upon the character of the entire post-exilic age down to the time of the birth of Christ, with its worldly ideals, its fierce fanati- cisms, its superstitious trust in rites and ceremonies ; if, when we look at all this, we hesitate to claim that the prophetic visions of a great restoration found fulfilment in the erection of this petty state, this paltry edifice, upon the ruins of David's capital ; shall we lay ourselves open to the accusation that we recognise no 126 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. r ■! element of truth in the glorious aspirations of the prophets ? I think not. After all, it is clear from the entire context that these hopes of a golden time to come are not inde- pendent of the attitude of the people towards lahvah. They will only be realized, if the nation shall truly repent of the past, and turn to Him with the whole heart. The expressions "at that time," "in those days" (vv. 17, 18), are only conditionally deter- minate ; they mean the happy time of Israel's repentance, if such a time should ever come. From this glimpse of glorious possibilities, the prophet turns abruptly to the dark page of Israel's actual history. Me has, so to speak, portrayed in characters of light the development as it might have been ; he now depicts the course it actually followed. He restates lahvah's original claim upon Israel's grateful devotion (ii. 2), putting these words into the mouth of the Divine Speaker : And I indeed thought, How will I set thee among the sons (of the Divine household), and give thee a lovely land, a heritage the fairest among the nations ! And methought, thou wouldst call Me ' My Father,^ and wouldst not turn back from following Me. lahvah had at the outset adopted Israel, and called him from the status of a groaning bondsman to the dignity of a son and heir. When Israel was a child, He had loved him, and called His son out of Egypt (Hos. ii. i), to give him a place and a heritage among nations. It was lahvah, indeed, who originally assigned their holdings to all the nations, and separated the various tribes of mankind, fixing the territories oj peoples, according to the number of the sons of God (Deut. xxxii. 8 Sept.). If He had brought up Israel from Egypt, He had also brought up the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Arameans from Kir (Amos ix. 7). iii.6-iv.2.] ISRAEL AND JUDAH: A CONTRAST. 127 But He had adopted Israel in a more special sense, which may be expressed in St. Paul's words, who makes it the chief advantage of Israel above the nations that unto them were committed the oracles of God. (Rom. iii. 2). What nobler distinction could have been conferred upon any race of men than that they should have been thus chosen, as Israel actually was chosen, not merely in the aspirations of prophets, but as a matter of fact in the divinely-directed evolution of human history, to become the heralds of a higher truth, the hierophants of spiritual knowledge, the universally recognised interpreters of God ? Such a calling might have been expected lo elicit a response of the warmest gratitude, the most enthusiastic loyalty and unswerving devotion. But Israel as a nation did not rise to the level of these lofty prophetic views of its vocation ; it knew itself to be the people of lahvah, but it failed to realize the moral significance of that privilege, and the moral and spiritual responsibilities which it involved. It failed to adore lahvah as the Father, in the only proper and acceptable sense of that honourable name, the sense which restricts its appli- cation to one sole Being. Heathenism is olind and irrational as well as profane and sinful ; and so it does not scruple to confer such absolutely individual titles as " God " and " Father " upon a multitude of imaginary powers. Methought thou loouldst call Me * My Father, and wouldst not turn back from following Me. But{Zeph. iii. 7) a woman t's false to her fere ; so were ye false to Me, O house of Israel, sai'th lahvah. "^he Divine intention toward Israel, God's gracious design for her everlasting good, God's expectation of a return for His favour, and how that design was thwarted so far as man could 128 THE PR0PHECi:2S OF JEREMIAH. thwart it, and that expectation disappointed hitherto; such is the import of the last two verses (19, 20). Speaking in the name of God, Jeremiah represents Israel's past as it appears to God. He now proceeds to shew dramatically, or as in a picture, how the expectation may yet be fulfilled, and the design realized. Having exposed the national guilt, he supposes his remonstrance to have done its work, and he overhears the penitent people pouring out its heart before God. Then a kind of dialogue ensues between the Deity and His suppliants. Hark! upon the bare hills is heard the weeping of the supplications of the sons of Israely that they perverted their way, forgot lahvah their God. The treeless hill-tops had been the scene of heathen orgies miscalled worship. There the rites of Canaan performed by Israelites had insulted the God of heaven (vv. 2 and 6). Now the very places which witnessed the sin, witness the national remorse and confession. (The * high-places ' are not condemned even by Jeremiah as places of worship, but only as places of heathen and illicit worships. The solitude and quiet and purer air of the hill-tops, their unobstructed view of heaven and suggestive nearness thereto, have always made them natural sanctuaries both for public rites and private prayer and meditation : cf. 2 Sam. xv. 32 ; and especially St. Luke vi. 12. In this closing section of the piece (iii. 19 — iv. 2) * Israel ' means not the entire people, but the northern kingdom only, which is spoken of separately also in iii. 6-18, with the object of throwing into higher relief the heinousness of Judah's guilt. Israel — the northern kingdom — was less guilty than Judah, for she had no warning example, no beacon-light upon her path, such iii.6-iv.2.] ISRAEL AND JUDAH: A CONTRAST. 129 as her own fall afforded to the southern kingdom ; and therefore the Divine compassion is more likely to be extended to her, even after a century of ruin and banishment, than to her callous, impenitent sister. Whether .t the time Jeremiah was in communication with survivors of the northern Exile, who were faithful to the God of their fathers, and looked wistfully toward Jerusalem as the centre of the best traditions and the sole hope of Israelite nationality, cannot now be deter- mined. The thing is not unlikely, considering the interest which the prophet afterwards took in the Judean exiles who were taken to Babylon with Jehoiachin (chap, xxix.) and his active correspondence with their leaders. We may also remember that '' divers of Asher and Manasseh and Zebulun humbled themselves" and came to keep passover with king Hezekiah at Jerusalem. It cannot, certainly, be supposed, with any show, of reason, that the Assyrians either carried away the entire population of the northern kingdom, or exterminated all whom they did not carry away. The words of the Chronicler who speaks of " a remnant . . . escaped out of the hand of the kings of Assyria," are themselves perfectly agreeable to reason 3nd the nature of the case, apart from the consideration that he had special historical sources at his command (2 Chron. xxx. 6, 11). We know that in the Maccabean and Roman wars the rocky fastnesses of the country were a refuge to numbers of the people, and the history of David shews that this had been the case from timt immemorial (cf. Judg. vi. 2). Doubtless in this way not a few survived the Assyrian invasions and the destruction of Samaria (b.c. 721). But to return to the text. After the confession of the nation that they have perverted their way (that is, their mode o^ worship, 9 130 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. by adoring visible symbols of lahvah, and associating with Him as His compeers a multitude of imaginary gods, especially the local Baalim, ii. 23, and Ashtaroth), the prophet hears another voice, a voice of Divine invitation and gracious promise, responsive to peni- tence and prayer : Return^ ye apostate sons, let Me heal your apostasies ! or If ye return, ye apostate sons, I will heal your apostasies ! It is an echo of the ten- derness of an older prophet (Hos. xiv. i, 4). And the answer of the penitents quickly follows : Behold us, we are come unto Thee, for Thou art lahvah our God. The voice that now calls us, we know by its tender tones of entreaty, compassion and love to be the voice of lahvah our own God ; not the voice of sensual Chemosh, tempting to guilty pleasures and foul im- purities, not the harsh cry of a cruel Molech, calling for savage rites of pitiless bloodshed. Thou, lahvah — not these nor their fellows — art our true and only God. Surely f in vain (for nought, bootlessly, i Sam. xxv. 2 1 ; chap. V. 2, xvi. 19) on the hills did we raise a din (lit. ^ hath one raised ' ; reading nirap and C}n) ; surely, in lahvah our God is the safety of Israel ! The Hebrew cannot be original as it now stands in the Masoretic text, for it is ungrammatical. The changes I have made will be seen to be very slight, and the sense obtained is much the same as Ewald's Surely in vain from the hills is the noise, from the mountains (where every reader must feel that from the mountains is a forcible-feeble addition which adds nothing to the sense). We might also perhaps detach the mem from the term for * hills,' and connect it with the preceding word, thus getting the meaning : Surely, for Lies are the hills, the uproar of the mountains ! (Cin jlDn. ■ • ■ Dnj^t?'?) ; that is to say, the high-places are devoted to delusive non- i iii.6-iv. 2.] ISRAEL AND JUDAH: A CONTRAST. •3' ^ Ihus the that ion- entities, who can do nothing in return for the wild orgiastic worship bestowed on them ; a thought which contrasts very well with the second half of the verse : Surely, in lahvah our God is the safety of Israel ! The confession continues : And as for the Shame — the shameful idol, the Baal whose worship involved shameful rites (chap. xi. 13; Hos. ix. 10), and who put his worshippers to shame, by disappointing them of help in the hour of their need (ii. 8, 26, 27) — as for the Shame — in contrast with lahvah, the Safety of Israel, who gives all, and requires little or nothing of this kind in return — /'/ devoured the labour of our fathers front our youth, their flocks and their herds, their sons and their daughters. The allusion is to the insatiable greed of the idol-priests, and the lavish expense of perpetually recurring feasts and sacrifices, which constituted a serious drain upon the resources of a pastoral and agricultural community ; and to the bloody rites which, not content with animal offerings, demanded human victims for the altars of an appalling superstition. Let us lie down in our shame, and let our infamy cover us ! for toward lahvah our God we trespassed, we and our fathers, from our youth even unto this day, and obeyed not the voice of lahvah our God. A more complete acknowledgment of sin could hardly be conceived ; no palliating circumstances are alleged, no excuses devised, of the kind with which men usually seek to soothe a disturbed conscience. The strong seductions of Canc'uinite worship, the temptation to join in the joyful merriment of idol-festivals, the invitation of friends and neighbours, the contagion of example, — all these extenuating facts must have been at least as well known to the prophet as to modern critics, but he is expres- sively silent on the point of mitigating circumstances in 132 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMfAH the case of a nation to whom such light and guidance had come, as came to Israel. No, he could discern no ground of hope for his people except in a full and unreserved admission of guilt, an agony of °hame and contrition before God, a heartfelt recognition of the truth that from the outset of their national existence to the passing day they had continually sinned against lahvah their God and resisted Mis holy Will. Finally, to this cry of penitents humbled in the dust, and owning that they have no refuge from the conse- quences of their sin but in the Div'ne Mercy, comes the firm yet loving answer : If thou wilt return^ O Israel, saith lahvahf unto Me wilt return, and if thou wilt put away thine Abominations [out of thy mouth and, LXX.] out of My Presence, and sway not to and fro (i Kings xiv. 15), but wilt swear 'By the Life of lahvah!^ in ^ood faith, justice, and righteousness ; then shall the nations bless themselves by Him, and in Him shall they glory (iv. i, 2). Such is the close of this ideal dia- logue between God and man. It is promised that if the nation's repentance be sincere — not half-hearted like that of Judah (iii. 10; 2 Chron. xxxiv. 33) — and if the fact be demonstrated by a resolute and unwavering rejection of idol-worship, evinced by the disuse of their names in oaths, and the expulsion of their symbols from the Presence, that is, out of the sanctuaries and domain of lahvah, and by adhering to the Name of the God of Israel in oaths and compacts of all kinds, and by a scrupulous loyalty to such engagements (Ps. XV. 4; Deut. X. 20; Isa. xlviii. i); then the ancient oracle of blessing will be fulfilled, and Israel will become a proverb of felicity, the pride and boast of mankind, the glorious ideal of perfect virtue and perfect happiness (Gen. xii. 3; Isa. Ixv. 16). Then, nd of ds, nts he ael ast ind en. . I iii.r)-iv.2l ISKARI. AND jaPATT: A CONTRAST. n\ all the nations will leather to^rr titer ii/ito Jerusalem for the Name of lahvah (iii. 17); they will recognise in the religion of lahvah the answer to their highest longings and spiritual necessities, and will take Israel for what lahvah intended him to be, their example and priest and prophet. Jeremiah could hardly have chosen a more extreme instance for pointing the lesson he had to teach than the long-since ruined and depopulated kingdom of the Ten Tribes. Hopeless as their actual condition must have seemed at the time, he assures his own country- men in Judah and Jerusalem that even yet, if only the moral requirements of the case were fulfilled, and the heart of the poor remnant and of the survivors in banishment aroused to a genuine and permanent repent- ance, the Divine promises would be accomplished in a people whose sun had apparently set in darkness for ever. And so he passes on to address his own people directly in tones of warning, reproof, and menace of approaching wrath (iv. 3-vi. 30,) !.«*• > IV. THE SCYTHIANS AS THE SCOURGE OF GOD, Jekemiah iv. 3-vi. 30. IF we would understand what is written here and elsewhere in the pages of prophecy, two things would seem to be requisite. We must prepare ourselves with some knowledge of the circumstances of the time, and we must form some general conception of the ideas and aims of the inspired writer, both in themselves, and in their relation to passing events. Of the former, a partial and fragmentary knowledge may suffice, pro- vided it be true so far as it goes ; minuteness of detail is not necessary to general accuracy. Of the latter, a very full and complete conception may be gathered from a careful study of the prophetic discourses. The chapters before us were obviously composed in the presence of a grave national danger ; and what that danger was is not left uncertain, as the discourse proceeds. An invasion of the country appeared to be imminent ; the rumour of approaching war had already made itself heard in the capital ; and all classes were terror-stricken at the tidings. As usual in such times of peril, the country people were already abandoning the unwalled towns and villages, to seek refuge in the strong places of the land, and, above all, in Jerusalem, which was at once the iv.3-vi.30.] SCYTIUANS AS THE SCOURGE OF GOD. 135 capital and the principal fortress of the kingdom. The evil news had spread far and near ; the trumpet-signal of alarm was heard everywhere; the cry was, Assemble yourselves y and let us go into the Jenced cities ! (iv. 5). The ground of this universal terror is thus declared : The lion is gone tip from his thicket, and the destroyer of nations is on his zvay, is gone forth from his place; to make thy land a desolation, that thy cities he laid waste, without inhabitant (ver. 7). A hot blast over the bare hills in the wilderness, on the road to the daughter of my people, not for winnowing, nor for cleans- ing; a full blast from those hills cometh at My beck (ver. 11). Lo, like clouds he cometh up, and, like the whirlwind, his chariots; swifter than vultures are his horses. Woe unto us ! We are verily destroyed (ver. 13). Besiegers (lit. watchmen, Isa. i. 8) are coming from the remotest land, and they utter their ery against the cities of fudah. Like keepers of a field become they against her on every side (vv. 16-17). ^^ the same time, the invasion is still only a matter of report ; the blow has not yet fallen upon the trembling people. Behold, I am about to bring upon you a nation from afar, O house of Israel, saith lahvah; an inexhaustible nation it is, a nation of old time it is, a nation whose tongue thou knowest not, nor understandest (lit. hearest) what it speaketh. Its quiver is like an opened grave; they all are heroes. And it will eat up thine harvest and thy bread, which thy sons and thy daughters should eat; it will eat up thy flock and thine herd; it will eat up thy vine and thy ftgtree ; it will shatter thine embattled cities, wherein thou art trusting, with the sword (y. 15-17). Thus hath lahvah said : Lo, a people cometh from a northern land, and a great nation is awaking from the uttermost parts of 136 THE PROPHECIES OF JEh'EM/AII. earth. Bow and lance they hold; savage it is, and pitiless; the sound of them is like the sea, when it roareth; and on horses they ride ; he ts a frayed as a man for battle, against thee, O daughter of Zion. We have heard the report of hint; our hands droop; anguish hath taken hold of us, throes, like hers that travaileth (vi. 22 sq). With the graphic force of a keen observer, who is also a poet, the priest of Anathoth has thus depicted for all time the collapse of terror which befel his contemporaries, on the rumoured approach of the Scythians in the reign of Josiah. And his lyric fervour carries him beyond this ; it enables him to see with the utmost distinctness the havoc wrought by these hcrdes of savages ; the surprise of cities, the looting of houses, the flight of citizens to the woods and the hills at the approach of the enemy ; the desertion of the country towns, the devastation of fields and vineyards, confusion and desolation everywhere, as though primeval chaos had returned ; and he tells it all with the passion and intensity of one who is relating an actual personal experience. In my vitals, my vitals, I quake, in the walls of my heart! My heart is murmuring to me; I cannot hold my peace; for my soul is listening to the trumpet-blast, the alarm of war! Ruin on ruin is cried, for all the land is ravaged ; suddenly are my tents ravaged, my pavilions in a moment! How long must I see the standards, must I listen to the trumpet-blast ? (iv. 19-21). / look at the eartlt, aud lo, His chaos: at the heavens, and their light is no more. I look at the mountains, and lo, they rock, and all the hills sway to and fro. I look, and lo, man is no more, and the birds of the air are gone. I look, and lo, the fruit- ful soil is wilderness, and all the cities of it are over- thrown (iv. 23-26). At the noise of liorseman and 1 ' i iv.3-vi.30,l SCYTHIANS AS THE SCOVRGE OF COP. 137 archer all the city is in Jlii^ht / They are ^oue into the thickets f and up the rocks they have clonih : all the city is deserted (ver. 29). Mis eye follows the course of devastation until it reaches Jerusalem : Jerusalem, the proud, luxurious capital, now isolated on her hills, bereft of all her daughter cities, abandoned, even betrayed, by her foreign allies. And thoiif that art doomed to destruction, what canst thou do ? Though thou clothe thee in scarlet, though thou deck thee with decking of gold, though thou broaden thine eyes with henna, in vain dost thou make thyself fair ; the lovers have scorned thee, thy life are they seeking} The "lovers" — the false foreigners — have turned against her in the time of her need ; and the strange gods, with whom she dallied in the days of prosperity, can bring her no help. And now, while she witnesses, but cannot avert, the slaughter of her children, her shrieks ring in the prophet's ear : A cry, as of one in travail, do I hear; pangs as of her that beareth her firstborn ; the cry of the daughter of Zion, that panteth, that spreadeth out her hands : PVoe's me ! my soul swooneth for the slayers ! (vv. 30, 3 1 ). Even the strong walls of Jerusalem are no sure defence ; there is no safety but in flight. Remove your goods, ye sons of Benjamin, from within Jerusalem ! And in Tekoah (as if Blaston or Blowick or Trumping- ton) blow a trumpet-blast, and upon Beth-hakkerem raise a signal (or beacon^ ! for evil hath looked forth ' The modern singer lias well cai;ght the echo of this ancient strain. " Wilt thou cover thine hair with gold, and with silver thy feet ? Hast thou taken the purple to fold thee, and made thy mouth sweet ? Behold, when thy face is made bare, he that loved thee shall hate : Thy face shall be no more fair at the fall of thy fate. " Atalanta in Calydon, t3« THE PROPHECIES OF fEKEMIAH from the tioyth, and mi^ihty rnin (vi. i, 2). 'I'he two towns mark the route of the fugitives, making for the wilderness of the south ; and the trumpet-call, and the beacon-light, muster the scattered companies at these rallying points or haltingplaces. The beautiful and the pampered one will I destroy — the daughter of Sion. (Perhaps : The beautiful and the pampered woman art thou like, daughter of Sion ! 3rd fem. sing, in -/'.) To her come the shepherds and their flocks ; they pitch the tents upon her round about; they graze each at his own side (i.e. on the ground nearest him). The figure changes, with lyric abruptness, from the fair woman, enervated by luxury (ver. 2) to the fair pasture-land, on which the nomad shepherds encamp, whose flocks soon eat the herbage down, and leave the soil stripped bare (ver. 3) ; and then, again, to an army beleaguering the fated city, whose cries of mutual cheer, and of impatience at all delay, the poet-prophet hears and rehearses. Hallow ye war against her! Arise ye, let us go up (to the assault) at noontide ! Unhappy we ! the day hath turned; the shadows of eventide begin to lengthen ! Arise ye, and let us go up in the night, to destroy her palaces! (vv. 4, 5)- As a fine example of poetical expression, the dis- course obviously has its own intrinsic value. The author's power to sketch with a few bold strokes the magical effect of a disquieting rumour ; the vivid force with which he realizes the possibilities of ravage and ruin which are wrapped up in those vague, uncertain tidings ; the pathos and passion of his lament over his stricken country, stricken as yet to his perception only ; the tenderness of feeling ; the subtle sweetness of language ; the variety of metaphor ; the light of imagi- I lv.3-vi.3o.l SCVrfffAJVS AS THE SCOVRCF. OF CO/). 139 nation illuminating the whole with its indefinable charm ; all these characteristics indicate the presence and power of a master-singer. But with Jeremiah, as with his predecessors, the poetic expression of feeling is far from being an end in itself He writes with a purpose to which all the endowments of his gifted nature are freely and resolutely subordinated. He values his powers as a poet and orator solely as instru- ments which conduce to an efficient utterance of the will of lahvah. He is hardly conscious of these gifts as such. He exists to " declare in the house of Jacob and to publish in Judah " the word of the Lord. It is in this capacity that he now comes forward, and addresses his terrified countrymen, in terms not calcul- ated to allay their fears with soothing suggestions of comfort and reassurance, but rather deliberately chosen with a view to h(M'ghtening those fears, and deepening them to a sense ( )i approaching judgment. For, after all, it is not the rumoured coming of the Scythian hordes that impels him to break silence. It is his consuming sense of the moral degeneracy, the spiritual degradation of his countrymen, which flames forth into burning utterance. Whom shall I address and adjure^ that they may hear? Lo, their ear is uncircnmcised, a?id they cannot hearken ; lo, the word of lahvah hath become to them a reproach ; they delight not therein. And of the fury of lahvah I am full; I am weary of holding it in. Then the other voice in his heart answers : Pour thou it forth upon the child in the street, and upon the company of young men together! (vi. 10, 11). It is the righteous indignation of an offended God that wells up from his heart, and overflows at his lips, and cries woe, irremediable woe, upon the land he loves better than his own life. 140 THE PROrHECIF.S OF JERRMTAH. He begins with encouragement and persuasion, but his tone soon changes to denunciation and despair (iv. 3 sq.\ Thus hath lahvah said to the men of Judah and to Jerusalem, Break you up the fallows, and sow not into thorns ! Circumcise yourselves to lahvah, and remove the foreskins of your heart, ye men of Judah, and ye inhabitants of Jerusalem ! lest My fury come forth like fire, and burn with none to quench it, because of the evil of your doings. Clothed with the Spirit, as Semitic speech might express it, his whole soul enveloped in a garment of lieavenly Hght — a magical garment whose virtues impart new force as well as new light — the prophet sees straight to the heart of things, and estimates with God-given certainty the real state of his people, and the moral worth of their seeming repentance. The first measures of Jcsiah's reforming zeal have been inaugurated ; at least within the limits of the capital, idolatry in its coarser and more repellent forms has been suppressed ; there is a shew of return to the God of Israel. But the popular heart is still wedded to the old sanctuaries, and the old sensuous rites of Canaan ; and, worse than ti^iis, the priests and prophets, whose centre of influence was the one great sanctuary of the Book of the Law, the temple at Jerusalem, have simply taken advantage of the religious reformation for their own purposes of selfish aggran- disement. From the youngest to the oldest of them, they all ply the trade of greed ; and from prophet to priest, they all practice lying. And they have repaired the ruin of [the daughter] of my people in light fashion, saying. It is well, it is well ! though it be not well (vi. 13, 14). The doctrine of the one legitimate sanc- tuary, taught with disinterested earnestness by the disciples of Isaiah, and enforced by that logic of events iv.3-vi.30,] SCYTHIANS AS THE SCOUh'GE OF GOD. 141 I which had demonstrated the fee'^leness of the local holy places before the Assyrian destroyers, had now come to be recognised as a convenient buttress of the private gains of the Jerusalem prieiithood and the venal prophets who supported their authority. The strong current of national reform had been utilized for the driving of their private machinery ; and the sole out- come of the self-denying efforts and sufferings of the past appeared to be the enrichment of these grasping and unscrupulous worldlings who sat, like an incubus, upon the heart of the national church. So long as money flowed steadily into their coffers, they were eager enough to reassure the doubting, and to dispel all misgivings by their deceitful oracle that all was well. So long as the sacrifices, the principal source of the priestly revenue, aboumied, and the festivals ran their yearly round, they atfirmed that lahweh was satisfied, and that no harm could befal the people of His care. This trading in things Divine, to the utter neglect of the higher obligations of the moral law, was simply appalling to the sensitive conscience of the true prophet of that degenerate age. A strange and a startling thing it is, that is come to pass in the land. The prophets, they have prophesied in the Lie, and the priests, they tyrannise under their direction; and My people, they love it thus ; and what will ye do for the issue thereof? (v, 30, 31.) For such facts must have an issue ; and the present moral and spiritual ruin of the nation points with certainty to impending ruin in the material and political sphere. The two things go together ; you cannot have a decline of faith, a decay of true religion, and permanent outward pros- perity ; that issue is incompatible with the eternal of humani rcgui progri nty. 142 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. One sits in the heavens, over all things from the beginning, to whom all stated worship is a hideous offence when accompanied by hypocrisy and impurity and fraud and violence in the ordinary relations of life. What good to me is incense that cometh from Sheba, and the choice calamus from a far country ? your burnt offerings (holocausts) are not acceptable, and your sacrifices are not sweet unto Me. Instead of purchas- ing safety, they will ensure perdition : Therefore thus hath lahvah said : Lo, I am about to lay for this people stumblingblocks, and they shall stumble upon them, fathers and sons together, a neighbour and his friend; and they shall pe) h (vi . 20 s^. ). In the early days of reform, indeed, Jeremiah himself appears to have shared in the sanguine views associated with a revival of suspended orthodoxy. The tidings of imminent danger were a surprise to him, as to the zealous worshippers who thronged the courts of the temple. So then, after all, " the burning anger of lahvah was not turned away " by the outw ard tokens of penitence, by the lavish gifts of devotion ; this unex- pected and terrifying rumour was a call for the resump- tion of the garb of mourning and for the renewal of those public fasts which had marked the initial stages of reformation (iv. 8). The astonishment and the dis- appointment of the man assert themselves against the inspiration of the prophet, when, contemplating the helpless bewilderment of kings and princes, and the stupefaction of priests and prophets in face of the national calamities, he breaks out into remonstrance with God. And I said, Alas, O Lord lahvah f of a truth, Thou hast utterly beguiled this people and Jeru- salem, saying. It shall be well with you ; whereas the sword will reach to the life. The allusion is to the iv.3-vi.3o.] SCYTHIANS AS THE SCOURGE OF GOD. 143 promises contained in the Book of the Law, the read- ing of which had so powerfully conduced to the move- ment for reform. That book had been the text of the prophet-preachers, who were most active in that work ; and the influence of its ideas and language upon Jeremiah himself is apparent in all his early discourses. The prophet's faith, however, was too deeply rooted to be more than momentarily shaken ; and it soon told him that the evil tidings were evidence not of unfaith- fulness or caprice in lahvah, but of the hypocrisy and corruption of Israel. With this conviction upon him, he implores the populace of the capital to substitute an inward and real for an outvvard and delusive purifica- tion. Break up the fallows ! Do not dream that any adequate reformation can be superinduced upon the mere surface of life : Sow not among thorns ! Do not for one moment believe that the word of God can take root and bear fruit in the hard soil of a heart that desires only to be secured in the possession of present enjoyments, in immunity for self-indulgence, covetous- ness, and oppression of the poor. Wash thine heart from wickedness, O fenisalem ! that thou mayst be saved. How long shall the schemings of thy folly lodge within thee ? For hark ! one declare th from Dan, and proclaimeth folly from the hills of Ephraim (iv. 14 sq.). The " folly " {'awen) is the foolish han- kering after the gods which are nothing in the world but a reflexion of the diseased fancy of their wor- shippers ; for it is always true that man makes his god in his own image, when he does make him, and does not receive the knowledge of him by revelation. It was a folly inveterate and, as it would seem, here- ditary in Israel, going back to the times of the I iges, and recalling the story of Micah the Ephrainiite and the I 144 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. Danites who stole his images. That ancient sin still cried to heaven for vengeance ; for the apostatizing tendency, which it exemplified, was still active in the heart of Israel/ The nation had "rebelled against" the Lord, for it was foolish and had never really known Him ; the people were silly children, and lacked insight ; skilled only in doing wrong, and ignorant of the way to do right (iv. 22). Like the things they worshipped, they had eyes, but saw not ; they had ears, but heard not. Enslaved to the empty terrors of their own imag- inations, they, who cowered before dumb idols, stood untrembling in the awful presence of Him whose laws restrained the ocean within due limits, and upon whose sovereign will the fall of the rain and increase of the field depended (v. 21-24). The popular blindness to the claims of the true religion, to the inalienable rights of the God of Israel, involved a corresponding and ever-increasing blindness to the claims of universal morality, to the rights of man. Competent observers have often called attention to the remarkable influence exercised by the lower forms of heathenism in blunting the moral sense ; and this influence was fully illustrated in the case of Jeremiah's contemporaries. So complete, so universal was the national decline that it seemed impossible to find one good man within the bounds of the capital. Every aim in life found illustration in those gay, crowded streets, in the bazaars, in the palaces, in the places by the gate where law was administered, except the aim of just and righteous and ' The second 'awcii, however, probably means "trouble," "calamity," as in Hab. iii. 7. The Sept. renders Ttdvog, and this agrees with the mention of Dan in viii. 16. As Ewald puts it, "from the north of Palestine the misery that is coming from the further north is already being proclaimed to all the nations in the south (vi. 18). " iv.3-vi.30.] SCYTHIANS AS THE SCOURGE OF GOD. 145 ted ind merciful dealing with one's neighbour. God was ignored or misconceived of, and therefore man was wronged and oppressed. Perjury, even in the Name of the God of Israel, whose eyes regard faithfulness and sincerity, and whose favour is not to be won by professions and presents ; a self-hardening against both Divine chas- tisement and prophetic admonition ; a fatal inclination to the seductions of Canaanite worship and the viola- tions of the moral law, which that worship permitted and even encouraged as i)leasing to the gods ; these vices characterized the entire population of Jerusalem in that dark period. Run ye to and fro in the streets of Jerusalem, and see now, and know, and seek ye in the broad places thereof, if ye can frnd a man, if indeed there be one that doeth justice, that seeketh sincerity; that I may pardon her. And if they say. By the life of lahvah ! even so they swear falsely. lahvah, are not thine eyes toward sincerity ? Thou smotest them, and they trembled not; Thou consumedst them, they refused to receive instruction ; they made their faces harder than a rock, they refused to repent. And for me, I said (methought). These are but poor folk; they behave foolishly, because they know not the way of lahvah, the justice (ver. i) of their God: let me betake myself to the great, and speak with them ; for they at least know the way of lahvah, the justice of their God: but these with one consent had broken the yoke, had burst the bonds in sunder (v. 1-5), Then, as now, the debasement of the standard of life among the ruling classes was a far more threatening symptom of danger to the commonwealth than laxity of principle among the masses, who had never enjoyed the higher knowledge and more thorough training which wealth and rank, as a matter of course, confer. If the crew turn drunken and mutinous, the ship is in un- 10 146 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. P questionable peril ; but if they who have the guidnrtcc of the vessel in their hands, follow the vices of those whom they should command and control, wreck and ruin are assured. The profligacy allowed by heathenism, against which the prophets cried in vain, is forcibly depicted in the words : Why should I pardon thee ? Thy sons have forsaken Me, and have sworn by them that are no gods : though I had bound them (to Me) by oath^ they committed (spiritual) adultery, and into the house of the Fornicatress (the idol's temple, where the harlot priestess sat for hire) they would flock. Stallions roaming at large were they; neighing each to his neighbour's wife. Shall I not punish such offences, saith lahvah ; and shall not My sotd avenge herself on such a nation as this ? 'I he cynical contempt of justice, the fraud and violence of those who were in haste to become rich, are set forth in the following : Among My people are found godless men; one watcheth, as birdcatchers lurk; they have set the trap, they catch men. Like a cage filled with birds, so are their houses filled with fraud : therefore they are become great, and have amassed wealth. They are become fat, they are sleek; also they pass over (Isa. xl. 27) cases (Ex. xxii. 9, xxiv. 14 ; of. also i Sam. x. 2) of wickedness — neglect to judge heinous crimes; the cause they judge not, the cause of the fatherless, to make it succeed ; and the right of the needy they vindicate not (v. 26-28). She is the city doomed to be punished ! she is all oppression within. As a spring poureth forth its waters, so she poureth forth her wickedness; violence and oppression resound in her; before Me continually is ' With a different point : " When I had fed them to the full " (cf Hos. xiii, 6). i iv.3-vi.30.] SCYTHIANS AS THE SCOURGE OF GOD. 147 all nd ts (cf fl sickness and wounds (vi. 6, 7). There would seem to be no hope for such a people and such a city. The prophet, indeed, cannot forget the claims of kindred, the thousand ties of blood and feeling that bind him to this perverse and sinful nation. Thrice, even in this dark forecast of destruction, he mitigates severity with the promir,e, yet will I not make a full end. The door is still left open, on the chance that some at least may be won to penitence. But the chance was small. The difficulty was, and the prophet's yearn- ing tenderness towards his people could not blind him to the fact, that all the lessons of God's providence were lost upon this reprobate race : They have belied the Lord, and said, it is not He; neither shall evil come upon us; neither shall we see sword and famine. The prophets, they insisted, were wrong both in the significance which they attributed to occasional calami- ties, and in the disasters, which they announced as imminent : The prophets will become wind, and the Word of God is not in them ; so will it turn out with them. It was, therefore, wholly futile to appeal to their better judgment against themselves : Thus said lahvah^ Stop on the ways, and consider, and ask after the eternal paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and find rest for your soul: and they said. We will not walk therein. And I will set over you watch- men (the prophets) ; hearken ye to the call of the trumpet ! (the warning note of prophecy) and they said We will not hearken. From such wilful hardness and impenitence, disdaining correction and despising reproof, God appeals to the heathen themselves, and to the dumb earth, to attest the j\istice of His sentence of destruction against this people : Therefore, hear, O ye nations, and know, and testify what is among 148 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. them ! Hear, O earth ! Lo, I am about to bring evil upon this people f the fruit of their own devisings; for unto My words they have not hearkened, and as for Mine instruction, they have rejected it. Their doom was inevitable, for it was the natural and necessary consequence of their own doings : Thine own way and thine Own deeds have brought about these evils for thee ; this is thine own evil; verily, it is bitter, verily, it reacheth unto thine heart The discourse ends with a despairing glance at the moral reprobation of Israel. An assayer did I make thee among My people, a refiner (reading mecnref Mai. iii. 2, 3), that thou mightest know and assay their kind (lit. ivay). Jeremiah's call had been to ** sit as a re^er and purifier of silver " in the name of his God : in other word's, to separate the good elements from the bad in Israel, and to gather around himself the nuclei's of a people " prepared for lahvah." But his work had been vain. In vain had the proplietic fire burnt within him ; in vain had the vehemency of the spirit fanned the flame ; the Divine word — that solvent of hearts — had been expended in vain ; no good metal could come of an ore so utterly base. They are all the worst ( i Ki. xx. 43) of rebels (or, deserters to the rebels), going about with slander; they are brass and iron; they all deal corruptly} The bellows blow; the lead (used for fining the ore) is consumed by the fire; in vain do they go on refining (or, does the refiner refine ^) / and the wicked are not separated. Refw^e silver are they called, for lahvah hath refused them. ' This term — mashchithim — is certainly not the pinr. ot the masli- chith, " pitfall " or " trap," of v, 26. The meaning is the same as in Isa. i. 4. The original force of the root shachath >3 seen in tlu Assyrian shachatu, "to fall down." '' The form — cdrof — is like bdchon, "assayer,'' in ver. 27. ' iV \1, - '). Iin , V. POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. Jeremiah vii.-x., xxvi. IN the four chapters which we are now to consider we have what is plainly a finished whole. The only 'possible exception (x. l-i6) shall be considered in its place. The historical occasion of the introductory prophecy (vii. 1-15), and the immediate effect of its delivery, are recorded at length in the twenty-sixth chapter of the book, so that in this instance we are happily not left to the uncertainties of conjecture. We are there told that it was in the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim son ofjosiah, king ofjudah, that Jeremiah received the command to stand in the fore-court of lahvah's house, and to declare to all the cities offudah that were come to worship there, that unless they repented and gave ear to lahvah's servants the prophets, He would make the temple like Shiloh, and Jerusalem itself a curse to all the nations of the earth. The substance of the oracle is there given in briefer form than here, as was natural, where the writer's object was principally to relate the issue of it as it affected himself. In neither case is it probable that we have a verbatim report of what was actually said, though the leading thoughts of his address are, no doubt, faithfully recorded by the prophet in the more elaborate com- K ISO THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. position (chap. vii.). Trifling variations between the two accounts must not, therefore, be pressed. Internal evidence suggests that this oracle was delivered at a time of grave public anxiety, such as marked the troubled period after the death of Josiah, and the early years of Jehoiakim. All Judah, or all the cities of Judah (xxvi. 2), that is to say, the people of the country towns as well as the citizens of Jerusalem, were crowding into the temple to supplicate their God (vii. 2). This indicates an extraordinary occasion, a national emergency affecting all alike. Probably a public fast and humiliation had been ordered by the authorities, on the reception of some threatening news of invasion. ^ " The opening paragraphs of the address are marked by a tone of controlled earnestness, by an unadorned plainness of statement, without passion, without exclamation, apostrophe, or rhetorical device of any kind ; which betokens the presence of a danger which spoke too audibly to the general ear to require artificial heightening in the statement of it. The position of affairs spoke for itself" (Hitzig). The very words with which the prophet opens his message, Thus said lahvah Sabaoth, the God of Isrady Make good your ways and your doings , that I may cause you to dwell {permanently^ in this place I (ver. 3, cf. ver. 7) prove that the anxiety which agitated the popular heart and drove it to seek consolation in religious observances, was an anxiety about their political stability, about the permanence of their possession of the fair land of promise. The use of the expression lahvah Sabaoth "lahvah (the God) of Hosts" is also significant, as indicating that war was what the nation feared ; while the prophet reminds them thus that all earthly powers, even the armies of heathen invaders, are controlled and vii.-x.,xxvi.J POPULAR AND TRUE KELIGION. «5« directed by the God of Israel for His own sovereign purposes. A particular crisis is further suggested by the warning : Trust ye not to the lying words, ' The Temple of lahvah, the Temple of lahvah, the Temple of lahvah, is this ! * The fanatical confidence in the inviolability of the temple, which Jeremiah thus deprecates, implies a time of public danger. A hun- dred years before this time the temple and the city had really come through a period of the gravest peril, justifying in the most palpable and unexpected manner the assurances of the prophet Isaiah. This was remembered now, when another crisis seemed immi- nent, another trial of strength between the God of Israel and the gods of the heathen. Only part of the prophetic teachings of Isaiah had rooted itself in the popular mind — the part most agreeable to it. The sacrosanct inviolability of the temple, and of Jerusalem for its sake, was an idea readily appropriated and eagerly cherished. It was forgotten that all depended on the will and purposes of lahvah himself; that the heathen might be the instruments with which lie executed his designs, and that an invasion of Judah might mean, not an approaching trial of strength between His omnipotence and the impotency of the false gods, but the judicial outpouring of His righteous wrath upon His own rebellious people. Jeremiah, therefore, affirms that the popular confi- dence is ill-founded ; that his countrymen are lulled in a false security ; and he enforces his point, by a plain exposure of the flagrant offences, which render their worship a mockery of God. Again, it may be supposed that the startling word, Add your burnt-offerings to your (ordinary) offerings, and eat the fksh {of them) (vii. 21), implies a time of i m THE rKoriiEciEs of jeremiaii. unusual activity in the matter of honouring the God of Israel with the more costly offerings of which the worshippers did not partake, but wliich were wholly consumed on the altar ; which fact also might point to a season of special danger. And, lastly, the references to taking refuge behind the walls of ' defenced cities' (viii. 14; x. 17), as we know that the Rcchabites and doubtless most of the rural populace took refuge in Jerusalem on the approach of the third and last Chaldean expedition, seem to prove that the occasion of the prophecy was the first Chaldean invasion, which ended in the submission of Jehoiakim to the yoke of Babylon (2 Kings xxiv. i). Already the northern frontier had experienced the destructive onslaught of the invaders, and rumour announced that they might soon be expected to arrive before the walls of Jerusalem (viii. 16, 17). The only other historical occasion which can be suggested with any plausibility is the Scythian invasion of Syria-Palestine, to which the previous discourse was assigned. This would fix the date of the prophecy at some point between the thirteenth and the eighteenth years of Josiah (b.c. 629 — 624). But the arguments for this view do not seem to be very strong in themselves, and they certainly do not explain the essential identity of the oracle summarized in chap. xxvi. 1-6, with that of vii. 1-15. The "undisguised references to the prevalence of idolatry in Jerusalem itself (vii. 17; cf. 30, 31), and the imwillingness of the people to listen to the prophet's teaching, (vii. 27)," are quite as well accounted for by supposing a religious or rather an irreligious reaction under Jehoiakim — which is every way probable considering the bad character of that king (2 Kings xxiii. 37; Jer. xxii. 13 sy^.), and the <: . vii.-x.,xxvi.J rorUl.AK AND TRUE RRI.IGION. t53 fS serious blow inflicted upon the reforming party by the death of Josiah ; as by assuming that the prophecy belongs to the years before the extirpation of idolatry in the eighteenth year of the latter sovereign. And now let us take a rapid glance at the salient points of this remarkable utterance. The people are standing in the outer court, with their faces turned toward the court of the priests, in which stood the holy house itself (Ps. v. 7). The prophetic speaker stands facing them, "in the gate of the Lord's house," the entry of the upper or inner court, the place whence Baruch was afterwards to read another of his oracles to the people (xxxvi. lo). Standing here, as it were between his audience and the throne of lahvah, Jeremiah acts as visible mediator between them and their God. His message to the worshippers who throng the courts of lahvah's sanctuary is not one of approval. He does not congratulate them upon their manifest devotion, upon the munificence of their offer- ings, upon their ungrudging and unstinted readiness to meet an unceasing drain upon their means. His message is a surprise, a shock to their self-satisfaction, an alarm to their slumbering consciences, a menace of wrath and destruction upon them and their holy place. His very first word is calculated to startle their self- righteousness, their misplaced faith in the merit of their worship and service. Amend your ways and your doings ! Where was the need of amendment ? they might ask. Were they not at that moment engaged in a function most grateful to lahvah ? Were they not keeping the law of the sacrifices, and were not the Levitical priesthood ministering in their order, and receiving their due share of the offerings which poured into the temple day by day ? Was not all this honour 154 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. enough to satisfy the most exacting cf deities ? Per- haps it w.?s, had the deity in question been merely r*3 one of the gods of Canaan. So much lip-service, so many sacrifice's and festivals, so much joyous revelling in the sanctuary, might be supposed to have sufficiently appeased one of the common Baals, those half-womanish phantoms of deity whose delight was imagined to be in feasting and debauchery. Nay, so much zeal might have propitiated the savage heart of a Molech. But the God of Israel was not as these, nor one of these ; though His ancient people were too apt to conceive thus of Him, and certain modern critics have uncon- sciously followed in their wake. Let us see what it was that called so loudly for amendment, and then we may become more fully aware of the gulf that divided the God of Israel from the idols of Canaan, and His service from all other service. It is important to keep this radical difference steadily before our minds, and to deepen the impression of it, in days when the effort is made by every means to confuse lahvah with the gods of heathendom, and to rank the religion of Israel with the lower surrounding systems. Jeremiah accuses his countrymen of flagrant trans- gression of the universal laws of morality. Theft, murder, adultery, perjury, fraud and covetousness, slander and lying and treachery (vii. 9, ix. 3-8), are charged upon these zealous worshippers by a man who lived amongst them, and knew them well, anrl could be contradicted at once if his charges were false. He iells them plainly that, in /irtue of their fre- quenting it, th** temple is become a den of robbers. And this trampling upon the common rights of man has its counterpart and its climax in treason against vii.-x., xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 155 ' God, in burning incense to the Baal, and walking after other gods whom they know not (vii. 9) ; in an open and shameless attempt to combine the worship of the God who had from the outlet revealed Himself to their prophets as a "jealous," i.e., an exclusive God, with the worship of shadows who had not revealed them- selves at all, and could not be "known," because devoid of all character and real existencfi. They thus ignored the ancient covenant which hid constituted them a nation (vii. 23). In the cities of Judah, in the streets of the very capital, the cultus of Ashtoreth, the Q leen of Heaven, the voluptuous Canaanite goddess of love and dalliance, was busily practised by whole families together, in deadly provocation of the God of Israel. The first and great commandment said, Thou shalt love lahvah thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve. And they loved and served and followed and sought after and worshipped the sun and the moon and the host of heaven, the objects adored by the nation that was so soon to enslave them (viii. 2). Not only did a worldly, covetous and sensual priesthood connive in the restora- tion of the old superstitions which associated other gods with lahvah, and set up idol symbols and altars within the precincts of His temple, as Manasseh had done (2 Kings xxi. 4-5) ; they went further than this in their " syncretism," or rather in their perversity, their spiritual blindness, their wilful misconception of the God revealed to their fathers. They actually confounded Him — the Lord who exercised loving kindness, justice, and righteous- ness, and delighted in the exhibition of these qualities by His worshippers (ix. 24) — with the dark and cruel sun- god of the Ammonites. They rebuilt the high-places of the \ Hinnom, on the north side Tophct, valley of 156 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. of Jerusalem, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; if by means so revolting to natural affection they might win back the favour of heaven — means which lahvah commanded not, neither came they into His mind (vii. 31). Such fearful and desperate expedients were doubtless first suggested by the false prophets and priests in the times of national adversity under king Manasseh. They harmonized only too well with the despair of a people, who saw in a long succession of political disasters the token of lahvah's unforgiving wrath. That these dreadful rites were not a "sur- vival " in Israel, seems to follow from the horror which they excited in the allied armies of the two kingdoms, when the king of Moab, in the extremity of the siege, offered his eldest son as a burnt-offering on the wall of his capital before the eyes of the besiegers. So appalled were the Israelite forces by this spectacle of a father's despair, that they at once raised the blockade, and retreated homeward (2 Kings iii. 27). It is prob- able, then, that the darker and bloodier aspects of heathen worship were of only recent appearance among the Hebrews, and that the rites of Molech had not been at all frequent or familiar, until the long and harassing conflict with Assyria broke the national spirit and inclined the people, in their trouble, to welcome the suggestion that costlier sacrifices were demanded, if lahvah was to be propitiated and His wrath appeased. Such things were not done, apparently, in Jeremiah's time ; he mentions them as the crown of the nation's past offences ; as sins that still cried to heaven for vengeance, and would surely entail it, because the same spirit of idolatry whic.i had culminated in these excesses, still lived and was active in the popular heart. It is the persistence in sins of the same character which vii.-x., xxvi ] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 157 involves our drinking tj the dregs the cup of punish- ment for the guilty past. The dark catalogue of for- gotten offences witnesses against us before the Unseen Judge, and is only obliterated by the tears of a true repentance, and by the new evidence of a change of heart and life. Then, as in some palimpsest, the new record covers and conceals the old ; and it is only if we fatally relapse, that the erased writing of our misdeeds becomes visible again before the eye of Heaven. Perhaps also the prophet mentions these abominations because at the time he saw around him unequivocal tendencies to the renewal of them. Under the patronage or with the connivance of the wicked king Jehoiakim, the reaction- ary party may have begun to set up again the altars thrown down by Josiah, while their religious leaders advocated both by speech and writing a return to the abolished cultus. At all events, this supposition gives special point to the emphatic assertion of Jeremiah, that lahvah had not commanded nor even thought of such hideous rites. The reference to the false labours of the scribes (chap. viii. 8^ lends colour to this view. It may be that some of the interpreters of the sacred law actually anticipated certain writers of our own day, in putting this terrible gloss upon the precept. The firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto Me (Ex. xxii. 29). The people of Judah were misled, but tliey were willingly misled. When Jeremiah declares to them, Lo, ye are trusting, for your part, upon the words of delusion, so that ye gain no good ! (vii. 8) it is perhaps not so much the smooth prophecies of the false prophets as the fatal attitude of the popular mind, out of which those misleading oracles grew, and whicli in turn they aggravated, that the speaker deprecates. He warns 1*^ IS8 THE PROPHECIES JP JEREMIAH. them that an absolute trust in the prcescntia Numinis is delusive ; a trust, cherished like theirs independently of the condition of its justification, viz., a walk pleasing to God. What ! will ye break all My laius, and then come and stand with polluted hands before Me in this house (Isa. i. 15), which is named after Me ' lahvah's House, (Isa. iv. l), and reassure yourselves with the thought, IVe are absolved from the consequences of all these abominations ? (vv. 9-10. Lit. IVe are saved, rescued, secured^ with regard to having done all these abominations : cf. ii. 35. But perhaps, with Ewald, we should point the Hebrew term differently, and read, " Save us ! " to do all these abominations, as if that were the express object of their petition, which would really ensue, if their prayer were granted : a fine irony. For the form of the verb, cf. Ezek. xiv. 14.) They thought their formal devotions were more than enough to counterbalance any breaches of the decalogue; they laid that flattering unction to their souls. They could make it up with God for setting His moral law at nought. It was merely a question of compensation. They did not see that the moral law is as immutable as laws physical ; and chat the consequences of violating or keeping it are as inseparable from it as pain from a blow, or death from poison. They did not see that the moral law is simply the law of man's health and wealth, and that the transgression of it is sorrow and suffering and death. " If men like you," argues the prophet, " dare to tread these courts, it must be because you believe it a proper thing to do But that belief implies that you hold the temple to be something other than what it really is ; that you see no incongruity in making the House of lahvah a meeting-place of murderers {spelunca latronum : Matt. vii.-x., xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 159 xxi. 13). That you have yourselves made it, in the full view of lahvah, whose seeing does not rest there, but involves results, such as the present crisis of public affair's ; the national danger is proof that He has seen your heinous misdoings." For lahvah's seeing brings a vindication of right, and vengeance upon evil (2 Chron. xxiv. 22 ; Ex. iii. 7). He is the watchman that never slumbers nor sleeps ; the eternal Judge, Who ever upholds the law of righteousness in the affairs of man, nor suffers the slightest infringement of that law to go unpunished. And this unceasing watchfulness, this perpetual dispensation of justice, is really a mani- festation of Divine mercy ; for the purpose of it is to save the human race from self-destruction, and to raise it ever higher in the scale of true well-being, which essentially consists in the knowledge of God and obedi- ence to His laws. Jeremiah gives his audience further ground for con- viction. He points to a striking instance in which conduct like theirs had involved results such as his warning holds before them. He establishes the proba- bility of chastisement by an historical parallel. He offers them, so to speak, ocular demonstration of his doctrine. / 6 THE Ph'OnihC/ES or JENEMIAH. certain that the institution of sacrifice was of extreme antiquity in Israel as in other ancient peoples, it is equally certain, from the plain evidence of their extant writings, that the prophets before the P'xiie attached no independent value either to it or to any other part of the ritual of the temple. We have already seen how Jeremiah could speak of the most venerable of all the symbols of the popular faith (iii. 1 6). Now he aflirms that the traditional rules for the burnt-offerings and other sacrifices were not matters of special Divine institution, as was popularly supposed at the time. The reference to the Exodus may imply that already in his day there were written narratives which asserted the contrary ; that the first care of the Divine Saviour after He had led His people through the sea was to provide them with an elaborate system of ritual and sacrifice, identical with that which prevailed in Jeremiah's day. The important verse already quoted (viii. 8) seems to glance at such pious fictions of the popular religious teachers: How say ye, We are wise, and the instruction (A. V. "law") of lahvah is with us? But behold for lies hath it wrought — the lying pen of the scribes I It is, indeed, difficult to see how Jeremiah or any of his predecessors could have done otherwise than take for granted the established modes of public worship, and the traditional holy places. The prophets do not seek to alter or abolish the external-, of religion as such ; they are not so unreasonable as to demand that stated rites and traditional sanctuaries should be dis- regarded, and that men should worship in the spirit only, without the aid of outward symbolism of any sort, however innocent and appropriate to its object it might seem. They knew very well that rites and ceremonies were necessary to public worship ; what they protested f vii.-x.,xxvi.J roVULAR AND TKUE KEI.liilON. I# against was the fatal tendency of their time to make these the whole of religion, to suppose that lahvah's claims could be satisfied by a due performance of these, without regard to those higher moral requirements of Ilis law which the ritual worship might fitly have symbolized but could not rightly s-upersede. It was not a question with Ilosea, Amos, Micah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, whether c- not lahvah could be better honoured with or without temples and priests and sacrifices. The question was whether these traditional institutions actually served as an outward expression of that devotion to Him and His holy law, of that righteousness and holiness of life, which is the only true worship, or whether they were looked upon as in themselves comprising the whole of necessary religion. Since the f)eople took this latter view, Jeremiah declares that their system of public worship is futile. Hearken unto My voice: not as giving regulations about the ritual, but as inculcating moral duty by the prophets, as is explained immediately (ver. 25), and as is clear also from the statement that they walked in the schemes of their own evil heart [omit : in the stuhhoniness, with LXX., and read moa(;dth stat. constr.], and fell to the rear and not the front. As they did not advance in the knowledge and love of the spiritual God, who was seeking to lead them by His prophets, from Moses downwards (Deut. xviii. 15), they steadily retrograded and declined in moral worth, until they had become hopelessly corrupt and past correction. (Lit. and thry became back and not face, which may mean, they turned thti*" backs upon lahvah and His instruction.) This steady progress in evil is indicated by the words, and they hardened their neck, they did worse than their fathers (ver. 26). It is implied that this was the lai.- with f 1 68 THE PKOPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. earh successive generation, and the view of Israel's history thus expressed is in perfect harmony with common experience. Progress, one way or the other, is the law of character ; if we do not advance in goodness, we go back, or, wha* is the same thing, we advance in evil. Finally, the prophet is warned that his mission also must fail, like that of his predecessors, unless indeed the second clause of ver. 27, which is omitted by the Septuagint, be really an interpolation. At all events, the failure is implied if not expressed, for he is to pronounce a sentence of reprobation upon his people. And thou shalt speak all these words unto them \and they will not hearken unto thee, and thou shalt call unto them, and they will not answer thee : LXX. omits]. And thou shall say unto them. This is the nation that hearkened not unto the voice of lahvah its God, and received not correction : Good faith is perished and cut oj^ front their mouth (cf. ix. 3 sq.). The charge is remarkable. It is one which Jeremiah reiterates: see ver. 9, vi. 13, viii. 5, ix. 3 sqq., xii. I. His fellow-countrymen are at once deceivers and deceived. They have no regard for truth and honour in their mutual dealings ; grasping greed and lies and trickery stamp their everyday intercourse with each other; and covetousness and fraud equally characterise the behaviour of their religious leaders. Where truth is not prized for its own sake, there debased ideas of God and lax conceptions of morality creep in and spread. Only he who loves truth comes to the light ; and only he who does God's will sees that truth is divine. False belief and false living in turn beget each other ; and as a matter of experience it is often impossible to say which was antecedent to the other. I In the closing section of this first part of his long address (vv. 29-viii. 3), Jeremiah apostrophizes the country, bidding her bewail her inimii:ent ruin. Shear thy tresses (coronal of long hair) and cast them away, and lift upon the bare hills a lamentation I — sing a dirge over thy departed glory and thy slain children, upon those unhallowed mountain-tops which were the scene of thine apostasies (iii. 21); for lahvah hath rejected and forsaken the generation of His wrath. The hopeless tone of this exclamation (cf. also vv. 15, 16, 20) seems to agree better with the times of Jehoiakim, when it had become evident to tho prophet that amend- ment was beyond hope, than with the years prior to Josiah's reformation. His own contemporaries are 'the generation of lahvah's wrath,' i.e. upon which His wrath is destined to bo poured out, for the day of grace is past and gone ; and this, because of the desecration of the temple itself by such kings as Ahaz and Manasseh, but especially because of the horrors of the child-sacrifices in the valley of ben Hinnom (2 Kings xvi. 3, xxi. 3-O), which those kings had been the first to introduce in Judah. Therefore behold days are coming, saith lahvah, and it shall no more be called the Tophet (an obscure term, probably meaning something like Pyir or Burningplace : cf. the Persian tab-idan "to burn," and the Greek duTTTco, rat^-klv "to bury," stii'tly " to burn " a corpse ; also TV(f>a), *' to smoke," Sanskrit dlnip : to suppose a reproachful name like "Spitting" = " Object of loathing," is clearly against the context: the honourable name is to be exchanged for one of tlis- honour), and the Valley of ben Hinnom, but the Valley of Slaughter, and people shall bury in \jhe^ Tophet for ivant of room (I'lsewhrre) ! A great battle is contem- plated, as is evident also from Deut. xxviii. 25, 26, the 170 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. latter verse being immediately quoted by the prophet (ver. 33). The Tophet will be defiled for ever by being made a burial place ; but many of the fallen will be left unburied, a prey to the vulture and the jackal. In that fearful time, all sounds of joyous life will cease in the cities of Judah and in the capital itself, for the land will become a desolafion. And the scornful enemy will not be satisfied with wreaking his vengeance upon the living ; he will insult the dead, by breaking into the sepulchres of the kings and grandees, the priests and prophets and people, and haling their corpses forth to lie rotting in face of the sun, moon and stars, which they had so sedulously worshipped in their life- time, but which will be powerless to protect their dead bodies from this shameful indignity. And as for the survivors, death will be preferred to life in the case of all the remnant that remain of this evil tribe, in all the places whither I shall have driven them, saith lahvah Sabaoth (omit the second that remain, with LXX. as an accidental repetition from the preceding line, and as breaking the construction). The prophet has reached the conviction that Judah will be driven into banish- ment ; but the details of the destruction which he contemplates are obviously of an imaginative and rhe- torical character. It is, therefore, superfluous to ask whether a great battle was actually fought afterwards in the valley of ben Hinnom, and whether the slain apostates of Judah were buried there in heaps, and whether the conquerors violated the tombs. Had the Chaldeans or any of their allies done this last, in search of treasure for instance, we should expect to find some notice of it in the historical chapters of Jeremiah. But it was probably known well enough to the sur- rounding peoples that the Jews were not in the habit of vii.-x., xxvi.j POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. \^\ \ burying treasure in their tombs. The prophet's threat however, curiously corresponds to what Josiah is related to have done at Bethel and elsewhere, by way of irre- parably polluting the high places (2 Kings xxiii. i6 sqq.) ; and it is probable that his recollection of that event, which he may himself have witnessed, determined the form rf Jeremiah's language here. In the second part of this great discourse (viii. 4-23) we have a fine development of thoughts which have already been advanced in the opening piece, after the usual manner of Jeremiah. The first half (or strophe) is mainly concerned with the sins of the nation (vv. 4-13), the second with a despairing lament over the punishment (l4-23 = ix. i). And thou slialt say unto tlwm : Tims said lahva/i, Do men fall and not rise again ? Doth a man turn back, and not return ? Why doth Jerusalem make this people to turn back ivith an eternal (or perfect, utter, absolute) turning back ? Why clutch they deceit, refuse to return ? (The LXX. omits " Jerusalem," which is perhaps only a marginal gloss. We should then have to read 3?1K' shobab for nji^lL" shobebah, as "this people" is masc. The I/e has been written twice by inadvertence. The verb, how- ever, is transitive in 1. 19 ; Isa. xlvii. 10, etc. ; and 1 find no certain instance of the in trans, form besides Ezek. xxxviii. 8, participle.) / listened and heard; they speak not aright (Ex. x. 29 ; Isa. xvi. 6) ; not a man repcnteth over his evil, saying (or thinking), " What luve I done ? " They all (lit. all of him, i.e. the NoTKON vii. 25. — The word answering t<» " daily " in the Hcb. .simply means "clay," and ought to be omittrd, as an accidental repetition cither from the |)revious line, or of thn last two letters of the preced- inj; word "prophets." Cf. ver. 13, where a similar phrase, "rising early ami speaking," occurs in a similar context, but without "daily." 173 THE PROrHEClES Oh' JEKEMIAiL w people) turn back into their courses (plur. Heb. text ; sing. Heb. marg.), like the rushing horse into the battle. There is something unnatural in this obstinate per- sistence in evil. If a man happens to fall he does not remain on the ground, but quickly rises to his feet again ; and if he turn back on his way for some reason or other, he will usually return to that way again. There is a play on the word * turn back ' or ' retur.i,' like that in iii. I2, 14. The term is first used in the sense of turning back or away from lahvah, and then in that of returning to Him, according to its metaphori- cal meaning " to repent." Thus the import of the question is : Is it natural to apostatize and never to repent of it ? ( Perhaps we should rather read, after the analogy of iii. i, " Doth a man go aivay i^'^JiX) on a journey, and not return ? ") Others interpret : Doth a man return^ and not n/urn ? That is, if he return, he does it, and does not stop mid- way ; whereas Judah only pretends to repent, and does not really do so. This, however, does not agree with the parallel member, nor with the following similar questions. It is very noticeable how thoroughly the prophets, n'ho, after ill, were the greatest of practical moralists, identify religion with right aims and right conduct. The beginning of evil courses is turning aNvay from lahvah ; the beginning of reform is turning back to lahvah. For lahvah's character as revealed to the prophets is the ideal and standard of ethical perfection ; He does and delights in love, justice and equity (ix. 23). If a man look away from that ideal, if he be content with a lower standard than the Will and Law of the All '^erfVict then and tiiereby lie inevitably sinks in the scale ! nioi-iity. The prophets are not troubled by I the idle question of mtdieval schoolmen and sceptical moderns. It never occurred to them to ask the question whether God is good because God wills it, or whetlier God wills good because it is good. The dilemma is, in truth, no better than a verbal pizzle, if we allow the existence of a personal Deity. For the idea of God is the idea of a Being who is absolutely good, the only Being who is such ; perfect goodness is understood to be realized nowhere else but in God. It is part of His essence and conception ; it is the aspect under which the human mind apprehends Him. To suppose goodness existing apart from Him, as an independent -object which He may choose or refuse, is to deal in empty abstractions. We might as well ask whether conve/. can exist apart from concave in nature, or motion apart from a certain rate of speed. The human spirit can appreiiend God in His moral perfections, because it is, at however vast a distance, akin to Him — a (iivinee pavticula aunx ; and it can strive towards those perfections by help of the same grace which reveals them. The prophets know of no other origin or measure of moral endeavour than that which lahvah makes known to them. In the present instance, the charge which Jeremiah makes against his contemporaries is a radical isehood, in- sincerity, faithlessness : they clutch or ig to deceit, they speak ivhat is not right or honest, aightforward (Gen. xlii. ii, 19). Their treason to Cjod and their treachery to their fellows are opposite s ..cs of the same fact. Had they been true to Iahva'\ '.hat is, to His teachings through the higher propht ^ and their own consciences, they would have been true to one another. The forbearing love of God, His tend^ r solicitude to hear and save, are illustrated by the words : / listened 174 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. I and heard . . . not a man repented over his evil, saying^ What have I done ? (The feeling of the stricken con- science could hardly be more aptly expressed than by this brief question.) But in vain does the Heavenly Father wait for the accents of penitence and contrition : they all return — go back again and again (Ps. xxiii. 6) — into their own race or courses, like a horse rushing (lit. pouring forth : of rushing waters, Ps. Ixxviii. 20) into the battle. The eagerness with which they follow their own wicked desires, the recklessness with which they " give their sensual race the rein," in set defiance of God, and wilful oblivion of consequences, is finely expressed by the' simile of the warhoise rushing in headlong eargerness into the fray (Job xxxix. 25). Also (or even) the stork in tlie neavens knowcth her appointed times, and turtledove, swift and crane observe the season of their coming; but My people know not the ordinance of lahvah — what He has willed and declared to be right for man (His Law ; jus divinum, relligio divind). The dullest of wits can hardly fail to appre- ciate the force of this beautiful contrast between the regularity of instinct and the aberrations of reason. All living creatures are subject to laws upon obedience to which their well-being depends. The life of man is no exception ; it too is subject to a law — a law which is as mucii higher than that which regulates mere' animal existence, as reason and conscience and spiri- tual aspiration are higher than instinct aad sexual impulse. But whereas the lower forms of life are obedient to the laws of their being, man rebels against them, and dares to disobey what he knows to be for his good ; nay, he suffers nimself to be so blinded by lust and passion and pride and self-will that at last he does not even recognise the Law — the ordinance of the vii.-x.,xxvi.l rOPUr.AR AND TRUE RELIGION. 175 Eternal — for what it really is, the organic law of his true being, the condition at once of his excellence and his happiness. The prophet next meets an objection. He has just alleged a profound moral ignorance — a culpable ignor- ance — against the people. He supposes them to deny the accusation, as doubtless they often did in answer to his remonstrances (cf. xvii. 15, xx. 7 sq.^ Hoiv can ye say, '* Wc are wise" — morally wise — " and the teaching of lahvah is with usf" [^but behold: LXX. omits : either term would be sufficient by itself] /or the Lie hath the lying pen of the scribes made it ! The reference clearly is to what Jeremiah's opponents call " the teaching (or law : torah) of lahvah " ; and it is also clear that the prophet charges the " scribes " of the opposite party with falsifying or tampering with the teaching of lahvah in some way or other. Is it meant that they misrepresented the terms of a wr't' document, such as the Book of the Covenant, or L^uitronomy ? Hut they could hardly do this without detection, in the case of a work which was not in their exclusive possession. Or does Jeremiah accuse them of misinterpreting the sacred law, by putting false glosses upon its precepts, as might be done in a legal document wherever there seemed room for a difference of opinion, or wherever conflicting traditional interpretations existed side by side ? (Cf. my remarks on vii. 31.) The Hebrew may indicate this, for we may translate : But lo, into the lie the lying pen of the scribes hath made it ! which recalls St. Paul's description of the heathen as changing the truth of God into a lie (Rom. i. 26). The construction is the same as in Gen. xii. 2 ; Isa. xliv. 17. Or, finally, does he boldly charge these abettors of the false pro- phets with forging supposititious law-books, in the If« THE PNOrilECIES OF JEREMLML interest of their own faction, and in support of the claims and tioctrines of the worldly priests and jirophels? 'I'his last vi(.'w is quite admissible, so far as the Hebrew goes, which, however, is not free IVom ambiguity. It might be rendered, But behold^ in vain^ or huotlcssly (iii. 23) hath the lying pen of the sondes lahonred; taking the verb in an absolute sense, which is not a common use (Ruth ii. 19). Or we might transpose tlie terms for " pen " and " lying," and render, But behold, in vain hath the pen of the scribes fabricated falsehood. In any case, the general sense is the same : Jeremiah charges not only the speakers, but the writers, of the popular party with utta»ing their own inventions in the name of lahvah. These scribes were the spiritual ancestors of those of our Saviour's time, who " made the word of God of none effect for the sake of their traditions" (Matt. XV. 6). For the Lie means, to maintain the popular misbelief. (It might also be rendered, for falsehood f falsely, as in the phrase to swear falsely, i.e., for deceit ; Lev. v. 24.) It thus appears that conflicting and competing versions of the law were current in that age. ills the Pentateuch preserved elements of both kinds, or ,s it homogeneous throughout ? Of the scribes of the period we, alas ! know little beyond what this passage tells us. But Ezra must have had predecessors, and we may remember that Baruch, the friend and amanuensis of Jeremiah, was also a scribe (xxxvi. 26). The, " wise " will blush, they will be dismayed and caught ! Lo, the word of lahvah they rejected, and wisdom of ivhat sort have they i' (vi. 10). The whole body of Jereniiah's opponents, the populace as well as the priests and prophets, arc intended by the wise, that is, the wise in their own conceits (ver. 8); there is an ironical reference to their own assumption of the i vii.-x.,xxvi.] P9PUI.AK AND TRUE NRI.lCION, ii7 title. These self-styled wise ones, who preferred their own wisdom to the guidance of tiie prophet, will be punished bj the niuitilication of discovering their folly when it is too late. Ihcir folly will be the instrument of their ruin, for '• He taketh the wise in their own craftiness" as in a snare (Prov. v. 22). They who reject iahvah's word, in whatever form it conies to them, have no other light to walk by ; they must needs walk in darkness, and stumble at noonday. For Iahvah's word is the only true wisdom, the only li ut. i^uidc of man's footsteps. And tiiis is the kind of wisdom whicli the Holy Scriptures offer us; not a merely speculative wisdom, not what is commonly understood by the terms science and art, but the price- less knowledge of God and of His will concerning us ; a Icind of knowledge which is beyond all comparison the most important for our well-being here and here- after. If this Divine wisdom, which relates to the proper conduct of life and the right education of the highest faculties of our being, seem a small matter to any man, the fact argues spiritual blindness on his part ; it cannot diminish the glory of heavenly wisdom. Some well-meaning but mistaken people are fond of maintaining what they call " the scientific accuracy of the Hible," meaning thereby an essential harmony with the latest discoveries, or even the newest hypo- theses, of physical science. But even to raise such a preposterous question, whether as advocate or as assailant, is to be guilty of a crude anachronism, and to betray an incredible ignorance of the real value of the Scriptures. That value I believe to be inestimable. But to discuss "the scientific accuracy of the Bible" aj)pears to me to be as irrelevant to any prolitable issue, as it would be to discuss the meteorological 12 178 THE PKOrHECIRS OhJRRRMlAH, precision of the Mahabharata, or the marvellous chemistry of the Zendavesta, or the physiological reve- lations of the Koran, or the enlightened anthropology of the Nibclungenlied. A man may reject the word of lahvah, he may reject Christ's word, because he supposes that it is not sufficiently attested. He may urge that the proof that it is of GOD breaks down, and he may flatter himself that he is a person of superior discernment, because he perceives a fact to which the multitude of believers arc apparently blind. But what kind of proof would he have ? Does he demand more than the case admits of? Some portent in earth or sky or sea, which in reality would be quite foreign to the matter in hand, and could have none but an accidental connexion with it, and would, in fact, be no proof at all, but itself a mystery requiring to be explained by the ordinary laws of physical causation ? To demand a kind of proof which is irrelevant to the subject is a mark not of superior caution and judgment, but of ignorance and confusion of thought. The plain truth is, and the fact is abundantly illustrated by the teachings of the prophets and, above all, of our Divine Lord, that moral and spiritual truths are self-attesting to minds able to realize th'jm ; and they no more need supplementary corroboration than does the ultimate testimony of the senses of a sane person. Now the Bible as a whole is an unique repertory of such truths ; this is the secret of its age-long influence in the world. If a man does not care for the Bible, if he has not learned to appreciate this aspect of it, if he does not love it precisely on this account, I, in turn, care very little for his opinion about the Bible. There may be much in the Bible which is otherwise valuable, vil.-x.,xxvi.] POrULAK AND TRUE RELIGION. •79 which is precious as history, as tradition, as bcaning upon questions of interest to the ethnologist, the anti- quarian, the man of letters. But these things are the shell, that is the kernel ; these are the accidents, that is the substance; these are the bodiU' vesture, that is the immortal spirit. A man who has not felt thij, has yet to learn what the Bible is. In his text as we now have it, Jeremiah proceeds to denounce punishment on the priests and prophets, whose fraudulent oracles and false interpretations of the Law ministered to their own greedy covetousness, and who smoothed over the alarming state of things by false ass-irances that all was well (vv. 1012). The Septuagint, however, omits the whole passage after the words, Therefore I ivill give their tvives to others, their fields to conquerors ! and as these words are obviously an abridgment of the threat, vi. 12 (cf Deut. xxviii. 30), while the rest of tl '^ passage agrees verbatim with vi. 13-15, it may be supposed that a later ditor inserted it in the margin here, an generally apposite (cf. vi. 10 with ver. 9), whence it has crept int' the text. It is true that Jeremiah himself is fond of repetition, but not so as to interrupt the context, as the "therefore" of ver. I O seems to do. Besides, the " wis* " of ver. 8 are the self-confident people ; but if this passage be in place here, •' the wise " of ver. 9 will have to be under- 'ood of their false guides, tiie prophets and priests. Whereas, if the passage be omitted, there is manifest contin' ity between the ninth verse and the thirteenth : " / ivill sweep, sweep them aivay" saith lahvah ; no grapes on the vine, and no figs on the fig tret and the foliage is tvithered, and I have given them dest ruction (or blasting). The opening threat is apparently quoted from the IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-S) k A {/ .y X i(g .V 4 < V A %^ ^ 1.0 L'l- tii 1.1 r-^Kfi >'... 1^ IL25 i 1.4 1.6 ^(^ Sk y y; -^ > ^ ^ ^# fliotpgraphic Sciences Corporation 23 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. MSSO (716) Ezi^soa iV iV ^^ N> ^''•- 6^ vl^^ i8o THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. contemporii y prophet Zephaniah (i. 2, 3). The point of the rest of the verse is not quite clear, owing to the fact that the last clause of the Hebrew text is undoubtedly corrupt. We might suppose that the term " laws " (D'*i'?n) had fallen out, and render, and I gave them laws which they transgress (cf. v. 22, xxxi. 35). The Vulgate has an almost literal translation, which gives the same sense : " et dedi eis quae praetergressa sunt."^ The Septuagint omits the clause, probably on the ground of its difficulty. It may be that bad crops and scarcity are threatened (cf. chap, xiv., v. 24, 25). In that case, we may correct the text in the manner suggested above DnnLJ*) or jK'na xvii. 18, for Dn?r ; or ns'iK' Amos iv. 9, for the D-n^y! of other MSS.). Others understand the verse in a metaphorical sense. The language seems to be coloured by a reminiscence of Micah vii. i, 2 ; and the "grapes " and "figs " and " foliage " may be the fruits of righteousness, and the nation is hke Isaiah's unfruitful vineyard (Isa. v.) or our Lord's barren fig tree (Matt. xxi. 19), fit only for destruction (cf. also vi. 9 and ver. 20). Another passage which resembles the present is Hab. iii. 17: " For the fig tree will not blossom, and there will be ' Wa'ctten lahem can only mean " and I gave (in prophetic idiom ' and I will give ') unto them," and this, of course, requires an object. " I will give them to those who shall pass over them " is the rendering proposed by several scholars. But lahem does not mean "to those," and the thought does not harmonize with what precedes, and this use of "13r is doubtful, and the verb " to give " absolutely requires an object. The Vulgate rendering is really more in accordance with Hebrew syntax, as the masc. suffix of the verb might be used in less accurate writing. Targum : " because I gave them My law from Sinai, and they transgressed against it ; " Peshito : " and I gave unto them, and they transgressed them." So also the Syro-Hexaplar of Milan (participle : "were transgressing ") between asterisks. i i i vii.-x.,xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. i8i no yield on the vines ; the produce of the olive will disappoint^ and the fields will produce no food." It was natural that tillage should be neglected upon the rumour of invasion. The country-folk would crowd into the strong places, and leave their vineyards, orchards and cornfields to their fate (ver. 14). This would, of course, lead to scarcity and want, and aggravate the horrors of war with those of dearth and famine. I think the passage of Habakkuk is a precise parallel to the one before us. Both contemplate a Chaldean invasion, and both anticipate its disastrous effects upon husbandry. It is possible that the original text ran : And I have given (zvill give) unto them their own work (i.e., the fruit of it, Dnniv : used of field-work, Ex. i. 14; of the earnings of labour, Isa. xxxii. 17). This, which is a frequent thought in Jeremiah, forms a very suitable close to the verse. The objection is that the prophet does not use this particular term for " work " elsewhere. But the fact of its only once occurring might have caused its corruption. (Another term, which would closely resemble the actual reading, and give much the same sense as this last, is U'y[2'0, "their produce." This, too, as a very rare expression, only known from Josh. v. II, 12, might have been misunderstood and altered by an editor or copyist. It is akin to the Aramaic 1-13V, and there are other Aramaisms in our prophet.) One thing is certain ; Jeremiah cannot have written what now appears in the Masoretic text. It is now made clear what the threatened evil is, in a fine closing strophe, several expressions of which recall the prophet's magnificent alarm upon the coming of the Scythians (cf. iv. 5 with viii. 14; iv. 15 with viii. 16; iv. 19 with viii. 18). Here, however, the ' w I I'H i! l82 THE PROPHECfES OF JEREMIAH. colouring is daikcr, and the prevailing gloom of the picture unrelieved by any ray of hope. The former piece belongs to the reign of Josiah, this to that of the worthless Jehoiakim. In the interval between the two, moral decline and social and political disintegration had advanced with fearfully accelerated speed, and Jeremiah knew that the end could not be far off. The fatal news of invasion has come, and he sounds the alarm to his countrymen. Why are we sitting still (in silent stupefaction) ? assemble your- selves, that we may go into the defenced cities, atid be silent (or amazed^ stupefied, with terror) there ! for lahvah our God hath silenced us (with speechless terror) aud given us water of gall to drink ; for we trespassed toward lahvah. We looked for peace (or, ii)eal, prosperity'), and there is no good ; for a time of healing, and behold panic fear! So the prophet represents the effect of the evil tidings upon the rural population. At first they are taken by surprise ; then they rouse themselves from their stupor to take refuge in the walled cities. They recognise in the trouble a sign of lahvah's anger. Their fond hopes of returning prosperity are nipped in the bud ; the wounds of the past are not to be healed ; the country has hardly recovered from one shock, before another and more deadly blow falls upon it. The next verse describes more particularly the nature of the bad news ; the enemy, it would seem, had actually entered the land, and given no uncertain indication of what the Judeans might expect, by his ravages on the northern frontier. From Ban was heard the snorting of his horses ; at the sound of the neighings of his chargers all the land did quake : and they came in (into the country) and eat up the land and the fulness thereof, a city and them that dwelt s vii.-x,xxvi.l POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. iS: therein. This was what the invaders did to city after city, once they had crossed the border ; ravaging its domain, and sacking the place itself. Perhaps, how- ever, it is better to take the perfects as prophetic, and to render : " From Dan shall be heard . . . shall quake : and they shall come and eat up the land," etc. This makes the connexion easier with the next verse, which certainly has a future reference : For behold I am about to send (or simply, I send) against yon serpents, basilisks (Isa. xi. 8, the ^if'oni was a small but very poisonous snake ; Aquila ^aaCKlaKo^, Vulg. regulus),ybr whom there is no charm, and they will bite you! saith lahvah. If the tenses be supposed to describe what has already hap- pened, then the connexion of thought may be expressed thus : all this evil that you have heard of has happened, not by mere ill fortune, but by the Divine will : lahvah Himself has done it, and the evil will not stop there, for He purposes to send these destroying serpents into your very midst (cf. Num. xxi. 6). The eighteenth verse begins in the Hebrew with a highly anomalous word, which is generally supposed to mean " my source of comfort " (>n^:''^3D). But both the strangeness of the form itself, which can nardly be paralleled in the language, and the indifferent sense which it yields, and the uncertainty of the Hebrew MSS., and the variations of the old versions, indicate that we have here another corruption of the text. Some Hebrew copies divide the word, and this is supported by the Septuagint and the Syro-Hexaplar version, which treat the verse as the conclusion of ver. i y, and render " and they shall bite you incurably, with pain ofyouf perplexed heart^^ (Syro-Hex. "without cure"). But if the first part of the word is " without " {hv^ " for lack of" . . .), what is the second ? No such root as the existing f! 'I -: I i i84 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. letters imply is found in nebrew or the cognate lan- guages. The Targuni does not help us : Because they were scoffing (p3''i;^D) against the prophets zvho prophesied unto them, sorrow and sighing will I bring (^rCN) upon them on account of their sins : upon them, saith the prophet, my heart is faint. It is evident that this is no better than a kind of punning upon the words of the Masoretic text.^ I incline to read "How shall I cheer myself? Upon me is sorrow ; upon me my heart is sick." (The prophet would write /V not yV. for "against," without a suffix. Read 113* *^V ^T^^^ ^P Job ix. 27, x. 20 ; Ps. xxxix. 14.) The passage is much Hke iv. 19. Another possible emendation is : " lahvah causeth sorrow to flash forth upon me" (nin'» ^''^aD ; after the archetype of Amos v. 9) ; but I prefer the former. Jeremiah closes the section with an outpouring of his own overwhelming sorrow at the heart-rending spectacle of the national calamities. No reader endued with any degree of feeling can doubt the sincerity of the prophet's patriotism, or the willingness with which he would have given his own life for the salvation of his country. This one passage alone says enough to exonerate its author from the charge of indifference, much more of treachery to his fatherland. He imagines himself to hear the cry of the captive people, who have been carried away by the victorious invader into a distant land : Hark ! the sound of the imploring cry of the daughter of my people from a land far away f "Is lahvah not in Sion ? or is not her King in her ? " (cf. Mic. iv. 9). Such will be the despairing utterance of ' It seems to take the w each time as 'w = IIHvr and to read *n*N D*a*i;'?D for ^n*3*^3D: thus getting "Scoffers! I will bring upon them sorrow ; upon them my heart is faint." /» f ! f vii.-x.,xxvi.l POPULAR AND TRUE REIJGfON. 185 the exiles of Judah and Jerusalem; and the j)rui)het hastens to answer it with another question, which accounts for their ruin by their disloyalty to that heavenly King ; O why did they vex Mv itnth their ij^ravctt images, ivith alien vanities ? Compare a similar question and answer in an earlier discourse (v. 19). It may be doubted whether the pathetic words which follow — The harvest is past, the /riiit-gathering is finished, but as Jor us, we are not delivered ! — are to be taken as a further complaint of the captives, or as a reference by the prophet himself to hopes of deliverance which had been cherished in vain, month after month, until the season of campaigns was over. In Palestine, the grain crops are harvested in April and May, the ingathering of the fruit falls in August. During all the summer months, Jehoiakim, as a vassal of Egypt, may have been eagerly hoping for some decisive interference from that quarter. That he was on friendly terms with that power at the time appears from the fact that he was allowed to fetch back refugees from its territory (xxvi. 22 sq.), A pro- vision for the extradition of offenders is found in the far more ancient treaty between Ramses II. and the king of the Syrian Chetta (fourteenth cent. b.c). But perhaps the prophet is alluding to one of those frequent failures of the crops, which inflicted so much misery upon his people (cf. vers. 13, iii. 3, v. 24, 25), and which were a natural incident of times of political unsettlement and danger. In that case, he says, the harvest has come and gone, and left us unhelped and disappointed. I prefer the political reference, though our knowledge of the history of the period is so scanty, that the particulars cannot be determined. It is clear eno'.gh from the lyrical utterance which follows (vv. 21-23), that heavy disasters had already be- ^'1 ^'■\ ,11 I I: i iS6 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. fallen Judah : For the shattering of the daii^htc, of uiv peoph' am I shattered; I aw a mourner; astonishment hath seized me ! This can hardly be pure anticipation. The next two verses may be a fragment of one of the prophet's elegies (qinoth). At all events, they recall the metre of Lam. iv. and v : Dot/i balm in Gilcad fail ? Fails the healer there ? Why is not bound up My people's deadly ivound? O that my head were springs, Mine eye a fount of tears f To weep both day and night Over 7ny people's slain. It is not impossible that these two quatrains are cited from the prophet's elegy upon the last battle of Megiddo and the death of Josiah. Similar fragments seem to occur below (ix. 17, 18, 20) in the instructions to the mourning-women, the professional singers of dirges over the dead. The beauty of the entire strophe, as an outpouring of inexpressible grief, is too obvious to require much comment. The striking question " Is there no balm in Gilead, is there no physician there ? " has passed into the common dialect of religious aphorism ; and the same may be said of the despairing cry, " The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved ! " The wounds of the state are past healing ; but how, it is asked, can this be? Does nature yield a balm which is sovereign for bodily hurts, and is there no- where a remedy for those of the social organism ? Surely that were something anomalous, strange and unnatural (cf. viii. 7). Is there no balm in Gilead? Yes, it is found nowhere else (cf. Plin., Hist. Nat., xii. vii.-x.,xxvi.] POrUrAR AM^ TRUE REfJGfON. 187 , 25 ad iiiit. "Scd omnibus odoribus pra?fcrtiir halsamiini, tmi terranim Judcect concessum "). Then has lahvah mocked us, by providing a remedy for the lesser evil, and leaving us a hopeless prey to the greater ? The question goes deep down to the roots of faith. Not only is there an analogy between the two realms of nature and spirit ; in a sense, the whole physical world is an adumbration of things unseen, a manifestation of the spiritual. Is it conceivable that order should reign everywhere in the lower sphere, and chaos be the normal state of the higher ? If our baser wants are met by provisions adapted in the most wonderful way to their satisfaction, can we suppose that the nobler — those cravings by which we are distinguished from irrational creatures — have not also their satisfactions included in the scheme of the world ? To suppose it is evidence either of capricious unreason, or of a criminal want of confidence in the Author of our being. Is there no balm in Gilead ? Is there no healer there ? There is a panacea for Israel's woes — the •' law " or teaching of lahvah ; there is a Healer in Israel, lahvah Himself (iii. 22, xvii. 14), who has declared of Himself, / wound and I heal (Deut. xxxii. 39; chap. xxx. 17, xxxiii. 6). Why then is no bandage applied to the daughter of my people? This is like the cry of the captives, Is lahvah not in Sion, is not her King in her ? (ver. 19). The answer there is, Yes! it is not that lahvah is wanting; it is that the national guilt is working out its own retribution. He leaves this to be understood here ; having framed his question so as to compel people, if it might be, to the right inference and answer. The precious balsam is the distinctive glory of the mountain land of Gilead, and the knowledge of lahvah is the distinctive glory of His people Israel. Will no one, then, ai)i)!y the true remedy to the hurt of the state ? No, for priests and prophets and people know not -they have refused to know lahvah (ver. 5). The nation will not look to the Healer and live. It is their misfortunes that they hate, not their sins. There is nothing left for Jeremiah but to sing the funeral song of his fatherland. While weeping o\ er their inevitable doom, the prophet abhors with his whole soul his people's wickedness, and longs to fly from the dreary scene of treachery and deceit. O thai I had in the wilderness a lodij^ing- place of IV ay faring men — some lonely khan on a caravan track, whose bare, unfurnished walls, and blank almost oppressive stillness, would be a grateful exchange for the luxury and the noisy riot of Judah's capital — that I might leave my people and go away from among them ! The same feeling finds expression in the sigh of the psalmist, who is perhaps Jeremiah himself : O for the ivings of a dove! (Ps. Iv. 6 sqq.) The same feeling has often issued in actual withdrawal from the world. And under certain circumstances, in certain states of religion and society, the solitary life has its peculiar advantages. The life of towns is doubtless busy, practical, intensely real ; but its business is not always of the ennobling sort, its practice in the strain and struggle of selfish competition is often distinctly hostile to the growth and play of the best instincts of human nature; its intensity is often the mere result of confining the manifold energies of the mind to one narrow channel, of concentrating the whole complex of human powers •and forces upon the single aim of self-advancement and self-glorification ; and its reality is consequently an illusion, phenomenal and transitory as the unsubstantial prizes which absorb all its interest, engross its entire vii..x.,xxvi.] POPUrAK AND TRUE RF.T.IGIOM. 189 devotion, and exhaust its whole activity. It i^i not upon the broad sea, nor in the lone wilderness, that men learn to question th^' goodness, the justice, the very being of their Maker. Atheism is born in tlie populous wastes of cities, where human beings crowd together, not to bless but to prey upon each other ; where rich and poor dwell side by side, but are separatt d by the gulf of cynical indifference and social disdain ; where selfishness in its ugliest forms is rampant, and is the rule of life with multitudes : — the selfishness which grasps at personal advantage and is deaf to the cries of human pain; the selfishness which calls all manner of fraud and trickery lawful means for the achievement of its sordid ends ; and the selfishness of flagrant vice, whose activity is not only earthly and sensual but also devilish, as directly involving the degradation and ruin of human souls. No wonder that they whose eyes have been blinded by the god of this world, fail to see evidence of any other God ; no wonder that they in whose hearts a coarse or a subtle self-worship has dried the springs of pity and love can scoff at the very idea of a compassionate God ; no wonder that a soul, shaken to its depths by the con- templation of this bewildering medley of heartlessness and misery, should be tempted to doubt whether there is indeed a Judge of all the earth, who doeth right. 1. I. il There is no truth, no honour in their dealings with one another ; falsehood is the dominant note of their social existence : They are all adulterers y a throng of traitors ! The charge of adultery is no metaphor (chap. v. 7, 8). Where the sense of religious sanctions is weak ned or wanting, the marriage tie is no longer respected ; and that which perhaps lust began, is ended by lust, and 1 90 THE r/WPHF.C/ES OF J Eh' EM/. til. man and woman arc faithless to each other, because they are faithless to (iod. And they bend their tongue, their bow, falsely.^ The tongue is as a bow of which words are the arrows. Evildoers '* stretch their arrow, the bitter word, to shoot in ambush at the blameless man " (Ps. Ixiv. 4 ; cf. Ps. xi. 2). The metaphor is common in the language of poetry ; we have an instance in Long- fellow's " I shot an arrow into the air," and Homer's familiar cTrea irrepoevTa, " winged words," is a kindred expression. (Others render, and they bend their tongue as their Iww of falsehood, as though the term shef/er, nicndacitint, were an epithet qualifying the term for " bow." I have taken it adverbially, a use justified by Pss. xxxviii. 20, Ixix. 5, cxix. 78, 86.) In colloquial English a man who exaggerates a story is said to ** draw the long bow." Their tongue is a bow with which they shoot lies at their neighbours, and it is not by truth — faithfulness, honour, integrity — that they wax mighty in the land; their riches and power are the fruit of craft and fraud and overreaching. As was said in a former discourse, " their houses are full of deceit, therefore they become great, and amass wealth " (v. 27). By truth, or more literally unto truth, according to the rule or standard of truth {cL Isa. xxxii. i, "according to right;" Gen. i. II, "according to its kind"). With the idea of the verb, we may compare Ps. cxii. 2 : " Mighty in the ' The irregular Hiphil form of the verb — cf, I Sam. xiv. 22; Job xix. 4 — may be justified by Job xxviii. 8; we are not, therefore, bound to render the Masoretic text : and they make their tongue bend their lying bow. Probably, however, Qal is right, the Hiphil being due to a misunderstanding, like that of the Targum, " And they taught their tongue words of lying." vii-x..xxvi.] rorULAK AND TRUE REIJGION. 191 land shall his seed become" (cf. also Gen. vii. 18, 19). The passage chap. v. 2, 3, is essentially similar to the present, and is the only one besides where we find the term " by truth " (n3iON^ k'emimali). The idiom seems certain, and the parallel passages, especially V. 27, appear to establish the translation above given ; otherwise one might be tempted to render : they stretch their tongue, their how, for lying (ip:;'^* v. 2), and it is not for truth that they arc strong in the hnd. ".Noblesse oblige " is no maxim of theirs ; they use their rank and riches for unworthy ends. For out of evil unto evil they go forth — they go from one wickedness to another, adding sin to sin. Appar- ently, a military metaphor. What they have and are is evil, and they go forth to secure fresh conquests of the same kind. Neither good nor evil is stationary ; pro- gress is the law of each — and Me they knoiv not, saith lahvah — they know not that I am truth itself, and there- fore irreconcilably opposed to all this fraud and falsehood. Beware ye, every one of his companion, and in no brother confide ye ; for every brother will surely play the Jacob, — and every cotnpanion will go about slandering. And they deceive each his neighbour, and truth they speak not: they have trained their tongue to speak falsehood, to pervert (their way, iii. 21) they toil (chap. xx. 9; cf. Gen. xix. 11). Thine inhabiting is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know Me, saith lahvah (3-5).^ As Micah had complained before him (Mic. ' Ewald prefers the reading of the LXX., which divides the words differently. If we suppose their version correct, they must have read : "They have trained their tongue to speak falsehood, to distort. They are weary of returning. Oppression in oppression, deceit in deceit ! They refuse to know Me, saith lalivah." But I do not think this an improvement on the present Masoretic text. THE PKOPHECIES OF JRKEMIAH. !l vii. 5), and as bitter experience had taught our prophet (xi. 18 sqq.^ xii. 6), nf^ither friend nor brother was to be trusted ; and that this was not merely the melan- choly characteristic of a degenerate age, is suggested by the reference to the un brotherly intrigues of the far-off ancestor of the Jewish people, in the traditional portrait of whom the best and the worst features of the national character are reflected with wonderful truth and live- liness.^ Every brother will not fail to play the Jacob (Gen. XXV. 29 sqq.^ xxvii. 36 ; Hos. xii. 4), to outwit, defraud, supplant ; cunning and trickery will subserve acquisitiveness. But though an inordinate love of acquisition may still seem to be specially characteristic of the Jewish race, as in ancient times it distinguished the Canaanite and Semitic nations in general, the tendency to cozen and overreach one's neighbour is so far from being confined to it, that some modern ethical speculators have not hesitated to assume this tendency to be an original and natural instinct of humanity. The fact, however, for which those who would account for human nature upon purely " natural " grounds are bound to supply some rational explanation, is not so much that aspect of it which has been well- known to resemble the instincts of the lower animals ever since observation began, but the aspect of revolt and protest against those lower impulses which we find reflected so powerfully in the documents of the higher religion, and which makes thousands of lives a perpetual warfare. Jeremiah presents his picture of the universal deceit and dissimulation of his own time as something ' If Jeremiali wrote Ps. Iv., as Hitzig supposes, he may be alluding to the treachery of a particular friend; *cf. Ps. Iv, 13, 14. vii.-x., xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. »93 peculiarly shocking and startling to the common sense of right, and unspeakably revolting in the sight of God, the Judge of all. And yet the difficulty to the modern reader is to detect any essential difference between human nature then and human nature now — between those times and these. It is still true that avarice and lust destroy natural affection ; that the ties of blood and friendship are no protection against a godless love of self. The work of slander and misrepresenta- tion is not left to avowed enemies ; your own acquain- tance will gratify their envy, spite, or mere illwill in this unworthy way. A simple child may tell the truth ; but tongues have to be trained to expertness in lying, whether in commerce or in diplomacy, in politics or in the newspaper press, in the art of the salesman or in that of the agitator and the demagogue. Men still make a toil of perverting their way, and spend as much pains in becoming accomplished villains as honest folk take to excel in virtue. Deceit is still the social atmosphere and environment, and through deceit men refuse to know lahvah. The knowledge, the recognition, the steady recollection of what lahvah is, and what His law requires, does not suit the man of lies ; his objects oblige him to shut his eyei. to the truth. Men do not will and will not, to know the moral impediments that lie in the way of self-seeking and self-pleasing. Sinning is always a matter of choice, not of nature, nor of circumstances alone. To desire to be delivered from moral evil is, so far, a desire to know God. Thine inhabiting is in the midst of deceit: who that ever lifts an eye above the things of time, has not at times felt thus ? " This is a Christian country." Why ? Because the majority are as bent on self- pleasing, as careless of God, as heartlessly and system- 13 194 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. atically forgetful of the rights and claims of others, as they would have been had Christ never been heard of ? A Christian country ? Why ? Is it because we can boast of some two hundred forms or fashions of supposed Christian belief, differentiated from each other by heaven knows what obscure shibboleths, which in the lapse of time have become meaningless and obsolete ; while the old ill-will survives, and the old dividing Unes remain, and Christians stand apart from Christians in a state of dissension and disunion that does despite and dishonour to Christ, and must be very dear to the devil ? Some people are bold enough to defend this horrible condition of things by raising a cry of Free Trade in Religion. But religion is not a trade, not a thing to make a profit of, except with Simon Magus and his numerous followers both inside and outside of the Church. A Christian country ! But the rage of avarice, the worship of Mammon, is not less rampant in London than in old Jerusalem. If the more violent forms of oppression and extortion are restrained among us by the more complete organization of public justice, the fact has only developed new and more insidious modes of attack upon the weak and the unwary. Deceit and fraud have been put upon their mettle by the challenge of the law, and thousands of people are robbed and plundered by devices which the law can hardly reach or Kestrain. Look where the human spider sits, weav- ing his web of guile, that he may catch and devour men ! Look at the wonderful baits which the company- monger throws out day by day to human weakness and cupidity ! Do you call him shrewd and clever and enterprising ? It is a sorry part to play in life, that of Satan's decoy, tempting one's fellow-creatures to their I vii.-x., xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 195 1 ji ruin. Look at the lying advertisements, which meet your eyes wherever you turn, and make the streets of this great city almost as hideous from the point of view of taste as from that of morality ! What a degrading resource ! To get on by the industrious dissemination of lies, by false pretences, which one knows to be false ! And to trade upon human misery — to raise hopes that can never be fulfilled — to add to the pangs of disease the smart of disappointment and the woe of a deeper despair, as countless quacks in this Christian country do! A Christian country : where God is denied on the platform and through the press ; where a novel is certain of widespread popularity, if its aim be to under- mine the foundations of the Christian faith ; where atheism is mistaken for intelligence, and an inconsistent Agnosticism for the loftiest outcome of logic and reason ; where flagrant lust walks the streets unrebuked, un- abashed ; where every other person you meet is a gambler in one form or another, and shopmen and labourers and loafers and errand boys are all eager about the result of races, and all agog to know the forecasts of some wily tipster, some wiseacre of the halfpenny press ! A Christian country : where the rich and noble have no better use for profuse wealth than horse-training, and no more elevating mode of recreation than hunting and shooting down innumerable birds and beasts ; where some must rot in fever-dens, clothed in rags, pining for food, stifling for lack of air and room ; while others spend thousands of pounds upon a whim, a banquet, a party, a toy for a fair woman. I am not a Socialist ; I do not deny a man's right to do what he will with his own, and I believe that state interference ■ 1, ■ 196 THE rROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. would be in the last degree disastrous to the country. But I affirm the responsibility before God of the rich and great ; and I deny that they who live and spend for themselves alone are worthy of the name of Christian. A Christian country : where human beings die, year after year, in the unspeakable, unimaginable agonies of canine madness, and dogs are kept by the thousand in crowded cities, that the sacrifice to the fiend of selfish- ness and the mocking devil of vanity may never lack its victims ! There is a more than Egyptian worship of Anubis, in the silly infatuation which lavishes tender- ness upon an unclean brute, and credulously invests instinct with the highest attributes of reason ; and there is a worse than heathenish besottedness in the heart that can pamper a dog, and be utterly indifferent to the helplessness and the sufferings of the children of the poor. And people will go to church, and hear what the preacher has to say, and "think he said what he ought to have said," or not, as the case may be, and return to their own settled habits of worldly living, as a matter of course. Oh yes ! it is a Christian country — the name of Christ has been named in it for fifteen centuries past ; and for that reason Christ will judge it. Therefore^ thus said lahvah Sabaoth : Lo, I am about to melt them and put them to proof {]o\i xii. 1 1 ; Judg. xvii. 4 ; ch. vi. 25.) ; for how am I to deal in face of \jhe wickedness of LXX : the term has fallen out of the Heb. text: cf. iv. 4, vii. 12] the daughter of My people ? This is the meaning of the disasters that have fallen and are even now falling upon the country. lahvah will melt and assay this rough, intractable human ore, in the ^tvy furnace of affliction ; the strain of insincerity that rurs through it, the base earthy nature, can only vii.-x.,xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 197 } thus be separated and purged away (Isa. xlviii. 10). A deadly arrow [LXX. a wounding one, t'C, one which does not miss, but hits and kills] is their tongue ; deceit it spake : with his mouth peace with his companion he speaketh, and imvardly he layeth his ambush (Ps. Iv. 22). The verse again specifies the wickedness complained of, and justifies our restoration of that word in the previous verse. Perhaps, with the Peshito Syriac and the Targum, we ought rather to render : a sharp arrow is their tongue. There is an Arabic saying quoted by Lane, " Thou didst sharpen thy longue against us," which seems to present a kindred root ^ (cf. Ps. Hi. 3, Ivii. 4 ; Prov. XXV. 18). The Septuagint may be right, with its probable reading : deceit arc the word< of his mouth. This certainly improves the symmetry of the verse. For such things (emphatic) shall I not — or should I not, with an implied ought — shall I not punish them, saith lahvah, or on such a nation shall not My soul avenge herself.'* (v. 9, 29, after which the LXX. omits them here.) These questions, like the previous one. How am I to deal — or, how could I act — in face of the wickedness of the daughter of My people f imply the moral necessity of the threatened evils. If lahweh be what He has taught man's conscience that He is, national sin must involve national suffering, and national persistence in sin must involve national ruin. There- fore He will melt and try this people, both for their punishment and their reformation, if it may be so. For punishment is properly retributive, whatever may be alleged to the contrary. Conscience tells us that we ' Shalmdhia lisdnaka 'alaina. In this case, we should follow the Heb. margin or Q're. vi • *«/*IMlH«rf>'n • 198 THE PROPHECIES OF JEKEMTAH. desert'e to suffer for ill-doing, and conscience is a better guide than ethical or sociological speculators who have lost faith in God. But God's chastisements as known to our experience, that is to say, in the present life, are reformatory as well as retributive ; they compel us to recollect, they bring us, like the Prodigal, back to ourselves, out of the distractions of a sinful career, they humble us with the discovery that we have a Master, that there is a Power above ourselves and our apparently unlimited capacity to choose evil and to do it : and so by Divine grace we may become contrite and be healed and restored. The prophet thus, perhaps, discerns a faint glimmer of hope, but his sky darkens again immediately. The land is already to a great extent desolate, through the ravages of the invaders, or through severe droughts (cf iv. 25, viii. 2o(?), xii. 4). Upon the mountains will I lift lip weeping and zvailing, and upon the pastures of the praine a lamentation, for they have been burnt up (ii. 1 5 ; 2 Kings xxii. 1 3), so that no man passeth over them, and they have not heard the cry of the cattle : from the birds of the air to the beasts, they are fled, are gone iv. 25). The perfects may be prophetic and announce what is certain to happen hereafter. The next verse, at all events, is unambiguous in this respect : And I will make Jerusalem into heaps, a haunt of jackals ; and the cities of Judah will I make a desolation without in- habitant. Not only the country districts, but the fortified towns, and Jerusalem itself, the heart and centre of the nation, will be desolated. Sennacherib boasts that he took forty-six strong cities, and "little towns withou*. number," and carried off 200, 1 50 male and female captives, and an immense booty in cattle, before proceeding to invest Jerusalem itself; a state- sJ \l vii.-.x., xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION'. 199 % which shews how severe the sufferings of Judah might be, before the enemy struck at its vitals. In the words / will make Jerusalem heaps, there is not necessarily a change of subject. Jeremiah was authorized to " root up and pull down and destroy " in the name of lahvah. He now challenges the popular wise men (viii. 8, 9) to account for what, on their principles, must appear an inexplicable phenomenon. Who is the (Jnie) ivise man, so that he understatids this (Hos. xiv. 9), and who is he to whom the mouth of lahvah hath spoken, so that he can explain it [unto you? LXX.]. Why is the land undone, burnt up like the prairie, without a passer by? Both to Jeremiah and to his adversaries the land was lahvah's land ; what befel it must have happened by His will, or at least with His consent. Why had He suffered the repeated ravages of foreign invaders to desolate His own portion, where, if anywhere on earth. He must display His power and the proof of His deity ? Not for lack of sacrifices, for these were not neglected. Only one answer was possible, to those who recognised the validity of the Book of the Law, and the binding character of the covenant which it embodied. The people and their wise men cannot account for the national calamities ; Jeremiah himself can only do so, because he is inwardly taught by lahvah himself (ver. 12): And lahvah said. It may be supposed that ver. 1 1 states the popular dilemma, the anxious question which they put to the official prophets, whose guidance they accepted. The prophets could give no reasonable or satisfying answer, because their teaching hitherto had been that lahvah could be appeased ''with thou- sands of rams, and ten thousand torrents of oil " (Mic. vi. 7). On such conditions they had promised peace, 20O THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. and their teaching had been falsified by events. There- fore Jeremiah gives the true answer for lahvah. But why did not the people cease to believe those whose word was thus falsified ? Perhaps the false prophets would reply to objectors, as the refugees in Egypt answered Jeremiah's reproof of their renewed worship of the Queen of Heaven : " It was in the years that followed the abolition of this worship that our national disasters began" (xliv. i8). It is never difficult to d''lude those whose evil and corrupt hearts make them desire nothing so much as to be deluded. And lahvah said: Because they forsook (lit. tipon-= on account of their forsaking) *^ My Law which I set before them " (Deiit. iv. 1 8), and they hearkened not unto My voice (Deut. xxviii. 15), and walked not therein (in My Law ; LXX. omi s the clause) ; and walked after the obstinacy of their own {evil: LXX.) heart, and after the Baals (Deut. iv. 3) which their fathers taught them — instead of teaching them the laws of lahvah (Deut. xi. 19). Such were, and had always been, the terms of the answer of lahvah's true prophets. Do you ask upon what ground (al mah) misfortune has overtaken you ? ITpon the ground of your having forsaken lahvah's " law " or instruction. His doctrine concerning Himself and your consequent obligations towards Him. They had this teaching in the Book of the Law, and had solemnly undertaken to observe it, in that great national assembly of the eighteenth year of Josiah. And they had had it from the first in the living utterances of the prophets. This, then, is the reason why the land is waste and deserted. And therefore — because past and present experience is an index of the future, for lahvah's character and purpose are constant — therefore the deso- ' vii.-x.,xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION, 201 lation of the cities of Judah and of Jerusalem itself, will ere long he accomplished. Therefore thus said lalivah Sahaothf the God of Armies and the God of Israel; Lo, I am about to feed them — or, / continue to feed them — to wit, this people (an epexegetical gloss omitted by the LXX.) with wormivood, and I will give them to drink waters of gall (Deut. xxix. 17. An Israelite inclining to foreign gods is " a root bearing wormwood and gall " — bearing a bitter harvest of defeat, a cup of deadly disaster for his people ; cf. Am. 'i. 12), and I will "scatter them among the nations," "whom they and their fathers knew not" (Deut. xxviii. 36, 64). The last phrase is remarkable as evidence of the isolation of Israel, whose country lay off the beaten track between the Trans-Euphratean empires and Egypt, which ran along the sea-coast. They knew not Assyria, until Tiglath Pileser's interven- tion (circ. 734), nor Babylon till the times of the New Empire. In Hezekiah's day, Babylon is still " a far country" (2 Kings xx. 14). Israel was in fact an agricultural people, trading directly with Phenicia and Egypt, but not with the lands beyond the Great River. The prophets heighten the horror of exile by the strangeness of the land whither Israel is to be banished. And I will send after them the sword, until I have con- sumed them. The survivors are to be cut off (cf. viii. 3); there is no reserve, as in iv. 27, v. 10, 18; a " full end " is announced ; which, again, corresponds to the aggravation of social and private evils in the time cf Jehoiakim, and the prophet's despair of reform. The judgment of Judah is the ruin of her cities, the dispersion of her people in foreign lands, and exter- mination by the sword. Nothing is left for this doomed nation but to sing its funeral song; to send for the professional wailing women, that they may come and It IN 202 THE PPOPHRCIES OF JEREMIAH. I chant their dirges, not over the dead but over the living who are condemned to die : Thus said lahvah Salnwth (here as in ver. 6, LXX. omits the expressive Sahaoth), Mark yc well the present crisis, and what it implies (cf. ii. 10; LXX. wrongly omits this emphatic term), and sum- mon the women that sing dirges, that they come, and unto the skilful women send ye, that they come [LXX. omits], and hasten [LXX. and speak and'] to lift up the death-ivail over us, that our eyes may run doivn with tears, and our eyelids pour down waters. The " singing women " of 2 Chron. xxxv. 25, or the "minstrels" of St. Matt. ix. 23, are intended. The reason assigned for thus inviting them assumes that the prophet's forecast is already fulfilled. Already, as in viii. 19, Jeremiah hears the loud wailing of the captives as they are driven away from their ruined homes : For the sound of the death-wail is heard from Sion, " How are ive undone I We are sore ashamed ^^ — of our false confidence and foolish security and deceitful hopes — "/or, after all, we have left the land, for our dwellings have cast (tis) out I " The last two lines appear to be parallels, which is against the ren- dering. For men have cast dozvn our dwellings. Cf. Lev. xviii. 25 ; chap. xxii. 28. From the wailing women, the address now seems to turn to the Judean women generally ; but perhaps the former are still intended, as their peculiar calling was probably here- ditary and passed on from mother to daughter : For hear, ye women, the word of lahvah, and let your ear take in the word of His mouth ! and teach ye your daughters the death-wail, and each her companion the lamentation; for • " Death scales our lattices, Enters our palaces, To cut off boy without, The young vienfrom the streets.'^ vii.-x.,xxvi] rOPUI.AR AND TRUE NFJ.IGION. ao) And the corpses, of mm will fall —\.\\t tense certifies the future reference of the others — like duiiir (viii. 2) on the face of the field (2 Kings ix. 37, of Jezebel's corpse) — left without !)urial rites to rot and fatten the soil — and like the corn-swath behind the render, and none shall gather (them). The quatrain (ver. 20) is possibly quoted from some familiar elegy ; and the allusion seems to be to a mysterious visitation like the plague, which used to be known in Europe as "the Black Death " (cf. xv. 2, xviii. 21, xliii. 11). In this time of closed gates and barred doors, death is represented as entering the house, not by the door, but "climbing up some other way" like a thief (Joel ii. 9; St. John x. i). Bars and bolts will be futile against such an invader. The figure is not continued in the second half of the stanza.^ The point of the closing comparison seems to be that whereas the corn-swaths are gathered up in sheaves and taken home, the bodies will lie where the reaper Death cuts them down. Thus said lahvah : Let not a wise man glory in his ivisdom, and let not the mighty man glory in his might ! Let not a rich man glory in his riches, but in this let him glory that glorieth, in being prudent and knoiving Me (LXX. omits pronoun, cf Gen. i. 4), that /, lahvah, do lovingkindness {and : LXX. and Orientals), justice ami righteousness upoti the earth ; for in these I delight, saith lahvah. It is not easy, at first sight, to see the connexion of this, one of the finest and deepest of Jeremiah's oracles, with the sentence of destruction which pre- cedes it. It is not satisfactory to regard it as stating ■ Speak Zhou, Thus saith lahweh^ is undoubtedly a spurious addition, and does not appear in the LXX. Jeremiah never says A'oh iie'uni lahvah, and never uses the imperative dabber !" m 204 rfIR PKOrUEClRS OF JEREMIAH. " the only means of escape and the reason v;hy it i? not used" (the latter being set forth in vv. 24, 25); for the leading idea of the whole composition, from vii. 13 to ix. 22, is that retribution is coming, and no escape, not even that of a remnant, is contemplated. The passage looks like an appendix to the previous pieces, such as the prophet might have added at a later period when the crisis was over, and the country had begun to breathe again, after the shock of invasion had rolled away. And this impression is confirmed by its contents. We have no details about the first interfer- ence of the new Chaldean power in Judah ; we only read that in Jehoiakim's days Nehtichadrczzar the king of Babylon came up, and Jehoiakim became his scnmnt three years : then he turned and rebelled against him (2 Kings xxiv. i). Hut before this, for some two or three years, Jehoiakim was the vassal of the king of Egypt to whom he owed his crown, and Nebuchadrezzar had to reduce Necho before he could attend to Jehoiakim. It may be, therefore, that the worst apprehensions of the time not having been realized, in the year or two of lull which followed, the politicians of Judah began to boast of their foresight and the caution and sagacity of their measures for the public safety, instead of ascribing the respite to God ; the warrior class might vaunt the bravery which it had exhibited or intended to exhibit in the service of the country ; and the rich nobles might exult in the apparent security of their treasures and the new lease of enjoyment accorded to themselves. To these various classes, who would not be slow to ridicule his dark forebodings as those of a moody and unpatriotic pessimist (xx. xxxvii. li), Jeremiah now 7, XXVI. II, xxix. 26, speaks, to remind them that if the danger is over for the present, it is the loving- vil.-x.,xxvi.l POPULAR AND TKUF. RELIGION. 205 1 kindness and the righteous government of lahvah which has removed it, and to declare that it is only suspended and postponed, not abolished for ever : Behold ^ days are comin^^ saitli lalivali, when I tvill visit (his guilt) H/)on every one that is eircunicised in foreskin (only, and not /"// heart also) : upon Egypt and upon Judah, and upon Edoni and upon the bene Annnon and upon MoaO, and upon all the tonsured folk that dwell in the wilderness : For all the nations are uneireinneised, and all the house of Israel are uncircunicised in heart. Egypt is mentioned first, as the leading nation, to which at the time the petty states of the west looked for help in their struggle against Babylon (cf. xxvii. 3). The prophet numbers Judah with the rest, not only as a member of the same political group, but as standing upon the same: level of unspiritual life. Like Israel, Egypt also practised circumcision, and both the context here requires and their kinship with the Hebrews makes it probable that the other peoples mentioned observed the same custom (Herod., ii. 36, 104), which is actually portrayed in a wall-painting at Karnak. The " tonsured folk " or " cropt-heads " of the wilderness are north Arabian nomads like the Kedarenes (xlix. 28, 32), and the tribes of Dedan, Tema and Buz (xxv. 23), whose ancestor was the circumcised Ishmael (Gen. xxv. 13 sqq., xvii. 23). Herodotus records their custom of shaving the temples all round, and leaving a tuft of hair on the top of the head (Herod., iii. 8), which practice, like circumcision, had a religious significance, and was forbidden to the Israelites (Lev. xix. 27, xxi. 5). Now why does Jeremiah mention circumcision at all ? The case is, I think, parallel to his mention of another external distinction of the popular religion, the I 'I I ■■.^^-^^a.^ -."c--^ 206 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. Ark of the Covenant (iii. 15). Just as in that place God promises shepherds according to Mine heart which shall shepherd the restored Israel with knowledge and prudence, and then directly adds that, in the light and truth of those days, the ark will be forgotten (lii. 15, 16); so here, he bids the ruling classes, the actual shepherds of the nation, not to trust in their own wisdom or valour or wealth (cf. xvii. 5 sqq^, but in being prudent and knowing lahvah, and then adds that the outward sign of circu.ncision, upon which the people prided themselves as the mark of their dedica- tion to lahvah, was in itself of no value, apart from a " circumcised heart," i.e., a heart purified of selfish aims and devoted to the will and glory of God (iv. 4). So far as lahvah is concerned, all Judah's heathen neighbours are uncircumcised, in spite of their ob- servance of the outward rite. The Jews themselves would hardly admit the validity of heathen circumcision, because the manner of it was different, just as at this day the Muhammadan method differs from the Jewish. But Jeremiah puts ''all the house of ^-rael," who were circumcised in the orthodox manner, on a level with the imperfectly circumcised heathen peoples around them. All alike are uncircumcised before God ; those who have the orthodox rite, and those who have but an inferior semblance of it ; and all alike will in the day of judgment be visited for their s"ns (cf. Amos i.). With the increasing carelessness of moral obliga- tions, an increasing importance would be attached to the observance of such a rite as circumcision, which was popularly supposed to devote a man to lahvah in such sense that the tie was indissoluble. Jeremiah says plainly that this is a mistiiken view. The outward -VX vii.-x., xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 207 sign must have an inward and spiritual grace corre- sponding thereto ; else the Judeans are no better than those whose circumcision they despise as defective. His meaning is that of the Apostle, " Circumcision veriiy profiteth, if thou keep the law ; but if thou be a breaker of law, thy circumcision hath become uncir- cumcision " (Rom. ii. 25). "Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, hut the keeping of the coininandmeitts of God^* scil. is everything (l Cor. vii. 19). It is "faith working by love," it is the " new creature " that is essential in spiritual religion (Gal. V. 6, vi. 15). Hcec dicit Dominus : Non glorietur sapiens in sapientia sua. Glancing back over the whole passage, we dis- cern an inward relation between these verses and the preceding discourse. It is not the outward props of state-craft, and strong battalions, and inexhaustible wealth, that really and permanently uphold a nation ; not these, but the knowledge of lahvah, a just insight into the true nature o-f God, and a national life regu- lated in all its departments by that insight. At the outset of this third section of his discourse (ix. 3-6), Jeremiah declared that corrupt Israel knew not and refused to know its God. At the beginning of the entire piece (vii. 3 5^.), he urged his countrymen to amend their ways and their doings, and not go on trusting in lying words and doing the opposite of loving- kindness and justice and righteousness, which alone are pleasing to lahvah (Mic. vi. 8), Who delighteth in lovingkindness and not sacrifice, and in the knowledge of God more than in burnt-offerings (Hos. vi. 6). And just as in the opening section the sacrificial worship was disparaged, taken as an " opus operatum," so here at the close circumcision is declared to have no inde- \i y<^ 208 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. pendent value as a means of securing Divine favour (ix. 25). Thus the entire discourse is rounded off by the return of the end to the beginning ; and the main thought of the whole, which Jeremiah has developed and enforced with so much variety of feeling and oratorical and poetical ornament, is the eternally true thought that a service of God which is purely external is no service at all, and that rites without a loving obedience are an insult to the Majesty of Heaven. X. 17-25. The latter part of chap. x. resumes the subject suspended at ix. 22. It evidently contemplates the speedy departure of the people into banishment. Away out of the land with thy pack (or thy goods ; LXX. viroaraai';, " property," Targ. " merchandise," the Heb. term, which is related to " Canaan," occurs here only), O thou that sittest in distress ! (or abides! in the siege : Hi. 5 ; 2 Kings xxiv. 10). Sion is addressed, and bidden to prepare her scanty bundle of bare necessaries for the march into exile. So Egypt is bidden to " make for herself vessels of exile," xlvi. 19. Some think that Sion is warned to withdraw her goods from the open country to the protection of her strong walls, before the siege begins, as in viii. 14; but we have passed that stage in the development of the piece, and the next verse seems to shew the meaning : For thus hath lahvah said, Lo, I am about to sling forth the inhabit- ants of the land this time — as opposed to former occa- sions, when the enemy retired unsuccessful (2 Kings xvi. 5, xix. 36), or went off satisfied with plunder or an indemnity, like the Scythians (see also 2 Kings xiv. 14) — and I will distress them that they may find out the truth, which now they refuse to see. The aposiopesis that they may find out ! is very striking. vii.-x., xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 209 The Vulgate renders the verb in the passive : " Tribu- labo eos ita ut inveniantur." This, however, does not give so good a sense as the Masoretic pointing, and Ewald's reference of the term to the goods of the panic-stricken fugitives seems flat and tasteless (" the inhabitants of the land will this time .... not be able to hide their goods from the enemy ! "). The best comment on the phrase is supplied by a later oracle : Z,o, / am about to make them know this time — / will make them know My hand and My might; that they may know that My name is lahvah (xvi. 21). Cf. also xvii. 9; Eccles. viii. 17. The last verse ( 1 7) resembles a poetical quotation ; and this one looks like the expHcation of it. There the population is personified as a woman ; here we have instead the plain prose expression, " inhabitants of the land." The figurative, " I will sling them forth " or "cast them out," explains the bidding of Sion to pack up her bundle or belongings — there seems to be a touch of contempt in this isolated word, as much as to signify that the people must go forth into exile with no more of their possessions than they can carry like a beggar in a bundle. The expression, " I will distress them," seems to shew that " thou that sittest in the distress " is proleptic, or to be rendered " thou that art to sit in distress," which comes to the same thing. ( tl tiig. And now the prophet imagines the distress and the remorse of this forlorn mother, as it will manifest itself when her house is ruined and her children are gone and she realizes the folly of the past (cf. iv. 31):— " Woe's me for my wound/ Fatal is my stroke ! 14 2IO THE PROPHECIES OF [EREMIAH. (perhaps quoted from a familiar elegy). And yet I — / thought (chap, xxii. 21 ; Ps. xxx. 7), Only this — no more than this — is my sickness : I can bear it ! (ni "|N SXK'N ""^^n ; LXX. aroVf Vulg. ntea). The people had never fully realized th*^ threatenings of the prophets, until they began to be accomplished. When they heard them, they had said, half-incredulously, half- mockingly. Is that all ? Their false guides, too, had treated apparent danger as a thing of little moment, assuring them that their half reforms, and zealous outward worship, were sufficient to turn away the Divine displeasure (vi. 14). And so they said to themselves, as sinners are still in the habit of saying, "If the worst come to the worst, I can bear it. Be- sides, God is merciful, and things may turn out better for frail humanity than your preachers of wrath and woe predict. Meanwhile — I shall do as I please, and take my chance of the issue." The lament of the mourning mother continues : My tent is laid waste and all my cords are broken ; My sons went forth of me (to battle) and are not; There is none to spread my tent any more, And to set up my curtains (cf. Amos ix. 11). Overhearing, as it were, this sorrowful lamentation (qinah), the prophet interposes v;ith the reason of the calamity : For the shepherds became brutish or behaved foolishly, stulte egerunt (Vulg.) — the leaders of the nation shewed themselves as in- sensate and silly as cattle — and lahvah they sought not (ii. 8) ; Therefore — r.s they had no regard for Divine counsel — they dealt not wisely (m. 15, ix. 23, xx. 11^, and all their flock was scattered abroad. Once more, and for the last time, the prophet sounds the alarm : Hark / a rumour ! lo, it cometh ! and a great uproar from the land of the north ; to make the vii.-x.,xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 211 Ig-) in- not vine "}» inds d a the . f cities of Judah a desolation^ a haunt of jackals ! It is not likely that the verse is to be regarded as spoken by the mourning country ; she contemplates the evil as already done, whereas here it is only imminent (cf. iv. 6, vi. 22, i. 15). The piece concludes with a prayer (vv. 23-25), which may be considered either as an intercession by the prophet on behalf of the nation (cf. xviii. 20), or as a form of supplication which he suggests as suitable to the existing crisis. / knoiv, lahvahy that man's way is not his own ; That it pertaineth not to a man to walk and direct his own steps : Correct me, lahvah, but with justice ; Not in Thine anger, lest Thou make me small! (Partly quoted, Ps. vi. i, xxxvi.'i. I.) Pour out Thy fury upon the nations that know Thee not, And upon tribes that have not called upon Thy name; For they have devoured Jacob [and will devour hint], [and consumed him'], and his pasture they have desolated ! (Ps. Ixxix. 6, 7, quoted from this place. In Jer. the LXX. omits "and will devour him;" while the psalm omits both of the bracketed ex- pressions.) The Vulgate renders ver. 23 : " Scio, Domine, quia non est hominis via ejus ; nee viri est ut ambulet, et dirigat gressus suos." I think this indicates the correct reading of the Hebrew text (l*3n\"^7n; cf. ix. 23, where two infinitives absolute are used in a similar way). The Septuagint also must have had the same text, for it translates, " nor will (=can) a man walk and direct his own walking." The Masoretic punctuation is certainly incorrect ; and the best that can be made of it is Hitzig's version, which, however, disregards the accents, although their authority is the same as that of the vowel points : / know lahvah that not to man belongeth his way, not to a perishing (lit. "going," " departing ") man \'.: 313 THE PROPHEC/ES OF JEREMIAH. — and to direct his steps. Any reader of Hebrew may see at once that this is a very unusual form of ex- pression. (For the thought, cf. Prov. xvi. 9, xix. 21 ; Ps. xxxvii. 23.) The words express humble submission to the im- pending chastisement. The penitent people does not deprecate the penalty of its sins, but only prays that the measure of it may be determined by right rather than by wrath (cf. xlvi. 27, 28). The very idea of right and justice implies a limit, whereas wrath, like all passions, is without limit, blind and insatiable. " In the Old Testament, justice is opposed, not to mercy, but to high-handed violence and oppression, which recognise no law but subjective appetite and desire. The just man owns the claims of an objective law of right." Non est hominis via ejus. Neither individuals nor nations are masters of their own fortunes in this world. Man has not his fate in his own hands ; it is controlled and directed by a higher Power. By sincere submis- sion, by a glad, unswerving loyalty, which honours himself as well as its Object, man may co-operate with that Power, to the furtherance of ends which are of all possible ends the wisest, the loftiest, the most bene- ficial to his kind. Self-will may oppose those ends, it cannot thwart them ; at the most it can but momentarily retard their accomplishment, and exclude itself from a share in the universal blessing. Israel now confesses, by the mouth of his best and truest representative, that he has hitherto loved to choose his own path, and to walk in his own strength, without reference to the will and way of God. Now, the overwhelming shock of irresistible calamity has brought him to his senses, has revealed to him his vii.-x., xxvi.] POPULAR AND TRUE RELIGION. 21 n* ily a powerlessness in the hands of the Unseen Arbiter of events, has made him see, as he never saw, that mortal man can determine neither the vicissitudes nor the goal of his journey. Now he sees the folly of the mighty man glorying in his might, and the rich man glorying in his riches ; now he sees that the how and the whither of his earthly course are not matters within his own control ; that all human resources are nothing against God, and are only helpful when used for and with God. Now he sees that the path of life is not one which we enter upon and traverse of our own motion, but a path along which we are led ; and so, resigning his former pride of independent choice, he humbly prays, " Lead Thou me on ! " Lead me whither Thou wilt, in the way of trouble and disaster and chastisement for my sins ; but remember my human frailty and weakness, and let not Thy wrath destroy me ! Finally, the suppliant ventures to remind God that others are guilty as well as he, and that the ruthless destroyers of Israel are themselves fitted to be objects as well as instruments of Divine justice. They are such (i) because they have not " known " nor " called upon " lahvah ; and (ii) because they have " devoured Jacob " who was a thing consecrated to lahvah (ii. 3), and therefore are guilty of sacrilege (cf. 1. 28, 29). It has never been our lot to see our own land over- run by a barbarous invader, our villages burnt, our peasantry slaughtered, our towns taken and sacked with all the horrors permitted or enjoined by a non- Christian religion. We read of but hardly realize the atrocities of ancient warfare. If we did realize them, we might even think a saint justified in praying for vengeance upon the merciless destroyers of his country. But apart from this, I see a deeper meaning in this prayer. The justice of this terrible visitation upon Judah is admitted by the prophet. Yet in Judah many righteous were involved in the general calamity. On the other hand, Jeremiah knew something of the vices of the Babylonians, against which his contemporary Habakkuk inveighs so bitterly. They " knew not " nor " called upon " lahvah ; but a base polytheism reflected and sanctioned the corruption of their lives. A kind of moral dilemma, therefore, is proposed here. If the purpose of this outpouring of Divine wrath be to bring Israel to "find out" (ver. i8) and to acknow- ledge the truth of God and his own guiltiness, can wrath persist, when that result is attained ? Does not justice demand that the tdrrent of destruction be diverted upon the proud oppressor ? So prayer, the forlorn hope of poor humanity, strives to overcome and compel and prevail with God, and to wrest a blessing even from the hand of Eternal Justice. -». .'. VI. THE IDOLS OF THE HEATHEN AND THE GOD OF ISRAEL. Jeremiah x. i-i6. THIS fine piece is altogether isolated from the surrounding context, which it interrupts in a very surprising manner. Neither the style nor the subject, neither the idioms nor the thoughts expressed in them, agree with what we easily recognise as Jere- miah's work. A stronger contrast can hardly be imagined than that which exists between the leading motive of this oracle as it stands, and that of the long discourse in which it is embedded with as little regard for continuity as an aerolite exhibits when it buries itself in a plain. In what precedes, the prophet's fellow-countrymen have been accused of flagrant and defiant idolatry (vii. 17 sqq., 30 sqq.')) the opening words of this piece imply a totally different situation. To the way of the nations become not accustomed, and of the signs of heaven be not afraid ; for the nations are afraid of them} Jeremiah would not be likely to warn inveterate apostates not to " accustom themselves " to idolatry. The words presuppose, not a nation whose idolatry was notorious, and had just been the subject ' LXX. " for they are afraid before them," : Dn^js"? HDH inn' 'D. 2l6 THE rKoriiEciEs of jekemiah. of unsparing rebuke and threats of imminent destruc- tion ; they presuppose a nation free from idolatry, but exposed to temptation from surrounding heathenism. The entire piece contains no syllable of reference to past or present unfaithfulness on the part of Israel. I lere at the outset, and throughout, Israel is implicitly contrasted with " the nations " {ja edvrj) as the servant of lahvah with the foolish worshippers of lifeless gods. There is a tone of contempt in the use of the term goyitn — "To the way of \.ht goyim accustom not your- selves ... for the goyim are afraid of them " (of the signs of heaven); or as the Septuagint puts it yet more strongly, " for they (the besotted goyim) are afraid {i.e., worship) before them ;" ^s though that alone — the sense of Israel's superiority — should be sufficient to deter Israelites from any bowings in the house of Rimmon.^ Neither this contemptuous use of the term goyim, " Gentiles," nor the scathing ridicule of the false gods and their devotees, is in the manner of Jeremiah. Both are characteristic of a later period. The biting scorn of image-worship, the intensely vivid perception of the utter incommensurableness of lahvah, the Creator of all things, with the handiwork of the carpenter and the silversmith, are well-known and distinctive features of the great prophets of the Exile (see especially Isa. xl.-lxvi.). There are plenty of allusions to idolatry in Jeremiah ; but they are expressed in a tone of fervid indignation, not of ridicule. It was the initial offence, which issued in a hopeless degradation of public and private morality, and would have for its certain conse- quence the rejection and ruin of the nation (ii. 5-13, 20-28, iii. 1-9, 23 sqq.). All the disasters, past and ' This is the most natural interpretation of the passage according to the Hebrew punctuation. Another is given below. I / \ il X. 1-16.] HEATHEN mors AND ISRAELS GOD. 217 present, which had befallen the country, were due to it (vii. 9, 17 sqq., 30 sqq., viii. 2 etc.). The people are urged to repent and return to lahvah with their whole heart (iii. 12 sqq., iv. 3 sqq., v. 21 sqq., vi. 8), as the only means of escape from deadly peril. The Baals are things that cannot help or save (ii. 8, 11); but the prophet does not say, as here (x. 5), " Fear them not ; they cannot harm you ! " The piece before us breathes not one word about Israel's apostasy, the urgent need of repentance, the impending ruin. Taken as a whole, it neither harmonizes with Jeremiah's usual method of argument, nor does it suit the juncture of affairs implied by the language which precedes and follows (vii. l- ix. 26, X. 17-25). For let us suppose that this oracle occupies its proper place here, and was actually written by Jeremiah at the crisis which called forth the preceding and following utterances. Then the warning cry, " Be not afraid of the signs of heaven ! " can only mean " Be not afraid of the Powers under whose auspices the Chaldeans are invading your country ; lahvah, the true and living God, will protect you ! " But consolation of this kind would be diametrically opposed to the doctrine which Jeremiah shares with all his predecessors; the doctrine that lahvah Himself is the prime cause of the coming trouble, and that the heathen invaders are His instruments of wrath (v. 9 sq., vi. 6) ; it would imply assent to that fallacious confi- dence in lahvah, which the prophet has already done his utmost to dissipate (vi. 14, vii. 4 sq.). The details of the idolatry satirized in the piece before us point to Chaldea rather than to Canaan. We have here a zealous worship of wooden images over- laid and otherwise adorned with silver and gold, and robed in rich garments of violet and purple (cf. Josh. 2 IS TlfE PROPHECIES OF JEKEAt/AI/. vii. 2i). This does not agree with what we know of Judean practice in Jeremiah's time, when, besides the worship of the Queen of Heaven, the people adored " stocks and stones ; " probably the wooden symbols of the goddess Asherah and rude sun-pillars, but hardly works of the costly kind described in the text, which indicate a wealthy people whose religion reflected an advanced condition of the arts and commerce. The designation of the objects of heathen worship as " the signs of heaven," and the gibe at the custom of carrying the idol-statues in procession (Isa. xlvi. i, 7), also point us to Babylon, " the land of graven images " (1. 38), and the home of star-worship and astrological super- stition (Isa. xlvii. 13). From all these considerations, it would appear that not Israel in Canaan but Israel in Chaldea is addressed in this piece by some unknown prophet, whose leaflet has been inserted among the works of Jeremiah. In that case, the much disputed eleventh verse, written in Aramaic, and as such unique in the volume of the pro- phets proper, may really have belonged to the original piece. Aramaic was the common language of inter- course between East and West both before and during the captivity (cf. 2 Kings xviii. 26) ; ^nd the suggestion that the tempted exiles should answer in this dialect the heathen who pressed them to join in their worship, seems suitable enough. The verse becomes very sus- picious, if we suppose that the whole piece is really part and parcel of Jeremiah's discourse, and as such addressed to the Judeans in the reign of Jehoiakim. Ewald, who maintains this view upon grounds that cannot be called convincing, thinks the Aramaic verse was originally a marginal annotation on verse 15, and suggests that it is a quotation from some early book I X. 1-16.1 HEATHEN IPOLS ANH ISRAEL'S GOP. 219 similar to the book of Daniel. At all events, it is improbable that the verse proceeded from the pen of Jeremiah, who writes Aramaic nowhere else, not even in the letter to the exiles of the first Judean captivity (chap. xxix.). But might not the piece be an address which Jeremiah sent to the exiles of the Ten Tribes, who were settled in Assyria, and with whom it is otherwise probable that he cultivated some intercourse ? The expression "House of Ismer' (ver. i) has been supposed to indicate this. That expression, however, occurs in the immediately preceding context (i\. 26), as does also that of " the nations " ; fac^s which may partially explain why the passage vre are discussing occupies its present position. The unknown author of the Apocryphal Letter of Jeremiah and the Chaldee Tar- gumist appear to have held the opinion that Jeremiah wrote the piece for the benefit of the exiles carried away with Jehoiachin in the first Judean captivity. The Targum introduces the eleventh verse thus : " This is a copy of the letter which Jeremiah the prophet sent to the remnant of the elders of the captivity which was in Babylon. And if the peoples among whom ye are shall say unto you. Fear the Errors, O house of Israel ! thus shall ye answer and thus shall ye say unto them : The Errors whom ye fear are (but) errors, in which there is no profit : they from the heavens are not able to bring down rain, and from the earth they cannot make fruits to spring : they and those who fear them will perish from the earth, and will be brought to an end from under these heavens. And thus shall ye say unto them : We fear Him that maketh the earth by His power," etc. (ver. 1 2). The phrase " the remnant of the elders of the captivity which was (or who were) 220 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. in Babylon" is derived from Jer. xrix. i. But how utterly different are the tone and substance of that message from those of the one before us ! Far from warning his captive countrymen against the state- worship of Babylon, far from satirizing its absurdity, Jeremiah bids the exiles be contented in their new home, and to pray for the peace of the city. The false prophets who appear at Babylon prophesy in lahvah's name (vv. 15, 21), and in denouncing them Jeremiah says not a word about idolatry. It is evident from the whole context that he did not fear it in the case of the exiles of Jehoiachin's captivity. (See also the simile of the Good and Bad Figs, chap, xxiv., which further illustrates the prophet's estimation of the earlier body of exiles.) The Greek Epistle of Jeremiah, which in MSS. is sometimes appended to Baruch, and which Fritzsche refers to the Maccabean times, appear to be partially based upon the passage we are considering. Its heading is : " Copy of a letter which Jeremiah sent unto those who were about to be carried away captives to Babylon, by the king of the Babylonians ; to announce to them as was enjoined him by God." It then begins thus : " On account of your sins which ye have sinned before God ye will be carried away to Babylon as captives by Nabuchodonosor king of the Babylonians. Having come, then, into Babylon, ye will be there many years, and a long time, until seven generations ; but after this I will bring you forth from thence in peace. But now ye will see in Babylon gods, silvern and golden and wooden, borne upon shoulders, shewing fear (an object of fear) to the nations. Beware then, lest ye also become like unto the nations, and fear take you at them, when ye see a multitude before and X. i-i6.] HEATHEN IDOLS AND ISRAEL'S GOD. 221 behind them worshipping them. But say ye in the mind : Thee it behoveth us to worship, O Lord ! For Mine angel is with you, and He is requiring your lives." The whole epistle is well wor*h reading as a kind of paraphrase of our passage. " For theif tongue is carven (or polished) by a carpenter, and themselves are over- laid with gold and silver, but lies they are and they cannot speak." " They being cast about ivith purple apparel have their face wiped on account of the dust from the house, which is plentiful upon them" (13). " But he holds a dagger with right hand and an axe, but himself from war and robbers he will not (= cannot) deliver" (15), cf. Jer. x. 1 5. " He is like one of the house- beams" (20, cf Jer. X. 8, and perhaps 5). "Upon their body and upon their head alight bats, swallows, and the birds, likewise also the cats ; whence ye will know that they are not gods ; therefore fear them not" (cf. Jer. x. 5). "At all cost are they purchased, in which there is no spirit" (25; cf Jer. x. 9, 14). " Footless, upon shoulders they are carried, displaying their own dishonour to men " (26). '•' Neither if they suffer evil from any one, nor if good, will they be able to recompense " (34 ; cf. ver. 5). " But they that serve them will be ashamed " (39 ; cf. ver. 14). "By carpenters and goldsmiths are they prepared ; they become nothing but what the craftsmen wish them to become. And the very men that prepare them can- not last long; how then are the things prepared by them likely to do so ? for they left lies and a reproach to them that come after. For whenever war and evils come upon them, the priests consult together where to hide with them. How the 1 is it possible not to perceive that they are not gods, who neither save themselves from war nor from evils ? For being of saa THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. I wood and overlaid with gold and silver they will be known hereafter, that they are lies. To all the nations and to the kings it will be manifest that they are not gods but works of men's hands, and no work of God is in them" (45-51; cf. Jer. x. 14-15). "^ wooden pillar in a palace is more useful than the false gods " (59). " Signs among nations they will not shew in heaven^ nor yet will they shine like the sun, nor give light as the moon" {^^). ^^ For as a scarecrotv in a cucumber-bed guarding nothing, so their gods are wooden and overlaid with gold and with silver^' (70; cf. Jer. X. 5). The mentior. of the sun, moon and stars, the lightning, the wind, the clouds, and fire "sent forth from above," as totally mlike the idols in " forms and powers," seems to shew that the author had verses 12, 13 before him. When we turn to the Septuagint, we are immediately struck by its remarkable omissions. The four verses 6-8 and lO do not appear at all in this oldest of the versions ; while the ninth is inserted between the first clause and the remainder of the fifth verse. Now, on the one hand, it is just the verses which the LXX. translates, which both in style and matter contrast so strongly with Jeremiah's authentic work, and are plainly incongruous with the context and occasion ; while, on the other hand, the omitted verses contain nothing which points positively to another author than Jeremiah, and, taken by themselves, harmonise very well with what may be supposed to have been the prophet's feeling at the actual juncture of affairs. " There is none at all like Thee, O lahvah ! Great art Thou, and great is Thy Name in might ! Who should not fear Thee, O King of the nations ? for 'tis Thy due; X. i-i6.] HEATHEN IDOLS AND ISRAEL'S GOD. 22- 1 For among all the wise of the nations and in all their kingdom there is none at all like Thee. And in one thing they are brute-like and dull ; In the doctrine of Vanities, which are wood ! But lahvah Elohim is truth ; He 1 ji a living God, and an eternal King : At liis wrath the earth quaketh. And nations abide not His indignation." As Hitzig has observed, it is natural that now, as the terrible decision approaches, the prophet should seek and find comfort in the thought of the all-over- shadowing greatness of the God of Israel. If, however, we suppose these verses to be Jeremiah's, we can hardly extend the same assumption to verses i2-i6, in spite of one or two expressions of his which occur in them ; and, upon the whole, the linguistic argument seems to weigh decisively against Jeremiah's authorship of this piece (see Naegelsbach). It may be true enough that " the basis and possibihty of the true prosperity and the hope of the genuine community are unfolded in these strophes " (Ewald) ; but that does not prove that they belong to Jeremiah. Nor can I see much force in the remark that " didactic language is of another kind than that of pure pro- phecy." But when the same critic affirms that " the description of the folly of idolatry ... is also quite new, and clear'y serves as a model for the much more elaborate ones, Isa. xl. 19-24 (20), xli. 7, xliv. 8- 20, xlvi. 5-7 ; " he is really giving up the point in dispute. Verses 12-16 are repeated in the prophecy against Babylon (li. 15-19); but this hardly proves that " the later prophet, chap. 1. li., found all these words in our piece ; " it is only evidence, so far as it ^o^s, for those verses themselves. The internal ' connexion which flwald assumes, is i!i I ':l 224 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. not self-evident. There is no proof that '' the thought that the gods of the heathen might again rule " occurred for one moment to Jeremiah on this occasion ; nor the thought that " the maintenance of the ancient true religion in conflict with the heathen must produce the regeneration of Israel." There is no reference through- out the disputed passage to the spiritual condition of the people, which is, in fact, presupposed to be good ; and the return in verses 17-25 "to the main subject of the discourse" is inexplicable on Ewald's theory that the whole chapter, omitting verse 11, is one homo- geneous structure. Hear ye the word that lahvah spake upon you, O house of Israel! Thus said lahvah. The terms imply a particular crisis in the history of Israel, when a Divine pronouncement was necessary to the guidance of the people. lahvah speaks indeed in all existence and in all events, but His voice becomes audible, is recognised as His, only when human need asserts itself in some particular juncture of affairs. Then, in view of the actual emergency, the mind of lahweh declares itself by the mouth of His proper spokesmen ; and the prophetic Thus said lahvah contrasts the higher point of view with the lower, the heavenly and spiritual with the earthly and the carnal ; it sets forth the aspect of things as they appear to God, in the sharpest antithesis to the aspect of things as they appear to the natural unilluminated man. Thus said lahvah : This is the thought of the Eternal, this is His judgment upon present conditions and passing events, whatever your thought and your judgment may happen or incline to be ! Such, I think, is the essential import of this vox solcnnis, this customary forn^ula of the dialect of prophecy. r I 7 ,■) X. i-i6.] HEATHEN IDOLS AND ISRAEL'S GOD. On the present occasion, the crisis in view of which a prophet declares the mind of lahvah is not a poHtical emergency but a rehgious temptation. The day for the former has long since passed away, and the depressed and scattered communities of exiled Israelites are exposed among other trials to the constant temptation to sacrifice to present expediency the only treasure which they have saved from the wreck of their country, the faith of their fathers, the religion of the prophets. The uncompromising tone of this isolated oracle, the abruptness with which the writer at once enters in inedias res, the solemn emphasis of his opening impera- tives, proves that this danger pressed at the time with peculiar intensity. Thus said lahvah : Unto the ivay of the nations use not yourselves. And of the signs of heaven stand not in awe, for that the nations stand in awe of them! (cf. Lev. xviii. 3; Ezek. xx. 18). The "way" of the nations is their religion, the mode and manner of their worship (v. 4, 5); and the exiles are warned not to suffer themselves to be led astray by example, as they had been in the land of Canaan ; they are not to adore the signs of heaven, simply because they see their conquerors adoring them. The "signs of heaven" would seem to be the sun, moon and stars, which were the objects of Babylonian worship; although the passage is unhappily not free from ambiguity. Some expositors have preferred to think of celestial phenomena such as eclipses and particular conjunctions of the heavenly bodies, which in thoGe days were looked upon as portents, fore- shadowing the course of national and individual fortunes. That there is really a reference to the astrological observation of the stars, is a view which finds con- siderable support in the words addresse^^. to Babylon 15 226 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH, I I on the eve of her fall, by a prophet, who, if not identical was at least contemporary with him whose message we are discussing. In the forty-seventh chapter of the book of Isaiah, it is said to Babylon : " Let now them that parcel out the heavens, that gaze at the stars, arise and save thee, prognosticating month by month the things that will come upon thee" (Isa. xlvii. 13). The signs of heaven are, in this case, the supposed indications of coming events furnished by the varying appearances of the heavenly bodies ; and one might even suppose that the immediate occasion of our prophecy was some eclipse of the sun or moon, or some remarkable conjunction of the planets which at the time was exciting general anxiety among the motley populations of Babylonia. The prophecy then becomes a remarkable instance of the manner in which an elevated spiritual faith, free from all the contaminating and blinding influences of selfish motives and desires, may rise superior to universal superstition, and boldly contradict the suggestions of what is accounted the highest wisdom of the time, anticipating the results though not the methods nor the evidence of science, at an epoch when science is as yet in the mythological stage. And the prophet might well exclaim in a, tone of triumph. Among all the wise of the nations none at all is like unto thee, O Lord, as a source of true wisdom and understanding for the guidance of life (ver. 7). The inclusion of eclipses and comets among the signs of heaven here spoken of has been thought to be barred by the considerations that these are sometimes alleged by the prophets themselves as signs of coming judgment exhibited by the God of Israel ; that, as a matter of fact, they were as mysterious and awful to the Jews as to their heathen neighbours ; and that X. i-i6.] HEATI/EX IDOLS AND ISRAEL'S GOD. 227 at what is here contemplated is not the terror inspired by rare occasional phenomena of this kind, but an habitual superstition in relation to some ever-present causes. It is certain that in another prophecy against Babylon, preserved in the book of Isaiah, it is declared that, as a- token of the impending destruction, "the stars of heaven and the Orions thereof shall not give their light : the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause his light to shine " (Isa. xiii. 10) ; and the similar language of the prophet Joel is well known (Joel ii. 2, 10, 30, 31, iii. 15). But these objections are not conclusive, for what our author is denouncing is the heathen association of " the signs of the heavens," whatever may be intended by that expres- sion, with a false system of religious belief. It is a special kind of idolatry that he contemplates, as is clear from the immediate context. Not only does the parallel clause " Unto the way of the nations use not your- selves " imply a gradual conformity to a heathen religion ; not only is it the fact that the Hebrew phrase rendered in our versions " Be not dismayed ! " may imply religious awe or worship (Mai. ii. 5), as indeed terms denoting fear or dread are used by the Semitic languages in general ; but the prophet at once proceeds to an. ex- posure of the absurdity of image-worship : For the ordinances (established modes of worship ; 2 Kings xvii. 8 ; here, established objects of worship) of the peoples are a tnere breath {i.e., nought) \for it (the idol) is a tree, which out of the forest one felted (so the accents) ; the handiwork of the carpenter with the bill. With silver and with gold one adorneth it (or, maketh it bright) ; with nails and with hammers they make them fast, that one sway not (or, that there be no shaking). Like the scare- crow of a garden of gourds are they, and they cannot 1! I 22« THE Ph'ori/Ec/Es OF J EK ran All. speak ; they are carried and carried^ for they cannot take a step (or, march) : he not a/raid of them, for they cannot hurt, neither is it in their power to benefit ! " 13e not afraid of them ! " returns to the opening charge : " Of the signs of heaven stand not in awe ! '' (cf. Gen. xxxi. 42, 53 ; Isa. viii. 12, 13). Clearly, then, the signa cceli are the idols against whose worship the prophet warns his people ; and they denote " the sun, the moon, the constellations (of the Zodiac), and all the host of heaven" (2 Kings xxiii. 5). We know that the kings of Judah, from Ahaz onwards, derived this worship from Assyria, and that its orig'nal home was Babylon, where in every temple the exiles would see images of the . deities presiding over the heavenly bodies, such as Samas (the sun) and his consort Aa (the moon) at Sippara, Merodach (Jupiter) and his son Nebo (Mercurius) at Babylon and Borsippa, Nergal (Mars) at Cutha, daily served with a splendid and attractive ritual, and honoured with festivals and pro- cessions on the most costly and magnificent scale. The prophet looks through all this outward display to the void within, he draws no subtle distinction between the symbol and the thing symbolized ; he accepts the popular confusion of the god with his image, and identifies all the deities of the heathen with the materials out of which their statues are made by the hands of men. And he is justified in doing this, because there can be but one god in his sense of the word ; a multitude oi gods is a contradiction in terms. From this point of view, he exposes the absurdity of the splendid idolatry which his captive countrymen see all around them. Behold that thing, he cries, which they call a god, and before which they tremble with religious fear ! It is nothing but a tree trunk hewn in the forest, and trimmed -.^ X. i-ifi.l rTRATTTEN I HOIS AND /SK/1FJ:S GOD. 229 into shape by the carpenter, and plated witli silver and gold, and fixed on its pedestal with hammer and nails, for fear it should fall ! Its terrors are empty terrors, like those of the palm-trunk, rough-hewn into human shape, and set up among the melons to frighten the birds away. "Olim trimcus eram ficulnus, inutile lignum, Cum faber, incertus scamnum faceretne Priapum, Maluit esse deum. Deus inde ego, fiirnm ariumtjue Maxima formido." (Hor., Sat. i. 8, i, st/q.) Though the idol has the outward semblance of a man, it lacks his distinguishing faculty of speech ; it is as dumb as the scarecrow, and as powerless to move from its place ; so it has to be borne about on men's shoulders (a mocking allusion to the grand pro- cessions of the gods, which distinguished the Babylonian festivals). Will you then be afraid of things that can do neither good nor harm ? asks the prophet ; in terms that recall the challenge of another, or perchance of himself, to the idols of Babylon : Do good or do evil, that wc may look at each other and see it together (Isa. xli. 23). In utter contrast with the impotence, the nothing- ness of all the gods of the nations, whether Israel's neighbours or his invaders, stands for ever the God of Israel. There is none at all like Thee, O lahweh ! great art Thou, and great is Thy Name in might ! With different vowel points, we might render. Whence (cometh) Thy like, O lahvah ? This has been sup- ported by reference to chap. xxx. 7: Alas ! for great is that day. Whence (is one) like it ? {me'ayin ?) ; but there too, as here, we may equally well translate, there is none like it. The interrogative, in fact, presupposes a negative answer ; and the Hebrew particle usually 23© THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. \ I :! ii; rendered there is tiof, are not {'nyin, 'en) has been explained as originally identical with the interrogative n'/iere ? ('aym, implied in fiie'ayin, " from where ? " "whence?" cf. Job. xiv. ro : ivhere is he?=hc is not). The idiom of the text expresses a more emphatic negation than the ordinary form would do ; and though rare, is by no means altogether unparalleled (see Isa. xl. 17, xli. 24 ; and other references in Gesenius). Great art Thou and great is Thy Name in might ; that is to say, Thou art great in Thyself, and great in repute or manifestation among men, in respect of might, virile strength or prowess (Ps. xxi. 14). Unlike the do- nothing idols, lahvah reveals His strength in deeds of strength .(fr. Exod. xv. 3 sqq.). Who should not fear Thee, Thou King of the nations ? (cf. v. 22) for Thee it bcseemeth (=it is Thy due, and Thine only) : for among all the wise of the nations and in all their realm, there is none at all (as in ver. 6) like Thee. Religious fear is instinctive in man ; but, whereas the various nations lavish reverence upon innumerable objects utterly unworthy of the name of deity, rational religion sees clearly that there can be but One God, working His supreme will in heaven and earth ; and that this Almighty being is the true " King of the nations," and disposes their destinies as well as that of His people Israel, although they know Him not, but call other imaginary beings their kings (a common Semitic desig- nation of a national god : Ps. xx. 9 ; Isa. vi. 5, viii. 21). He, then, is the proper object of the instinct of religious awe ; all the peoples of the earth owe Him adoration, even though they be ignorant of their obligation ; worship is His unshared prerogative. Among all the zoise of the nations and in all their realm, not one is like Thee ! Who are the wise thus contrasted X. r-i6.] HEATHEN /POLS AND ISKARl.'S COP. 231 with the Supreme God ? Are the false gods the re- puted wise ones, giving pretended counsel to their deluded worshippers through the priestly oracle ? The term " kingdom " seems to indicate this view, if we take " their kingdom " to mean the kingdom of the wise ones of the nations, that is, the countries whose " kings " they are, where they are worshipped as such. The heathen in general, and the Babylonians in par- ticular, ascribed wisdom to their gods. But there is no impropriety from an Old Testament point of view in comparing lahvah's wisdom with the wisdom of man. The meaning of the prophet may be simply this, that no earthly wisdom, craft or political sagacity, not even in the most powerful empires such as Babylon, can be a match for lahvah the AH- wise, or avail to thwart His purposes (Isa. xxxi. i, 2). "Wise" and *• sagacious " are titles which the kings of Babylon continually assert for themselves in their extant in- scriptions ; and the wisdom and learning of the Chaldeans was famous in the ancient world. Either view will agree with what follows : But in one thing they — the nations, or their wise men — will turn out brutish and besotted: (in) the teaching of Vanities which are wood. The verse is difficult ; but the expression " the teaching (or doctrine) of Vanities " may perhaps be regarded as equivalent to the idols taught of; and then the second half of the verse is constructed like the first member of ver. 3 : The ordinances of the peoples are Vanity, and may be rendered, the idols taught of are mere wood (cf. vei 3 b, ii. 27, iii. 9). It is possible also that the right reading is " foundation " (musad) not "doctrine " {mnsar) : the foundation (basis, substra- tum, substance) of idols is wood. (The term " Vanities " — habalim — is used for "idols," viii. 19, xiv. 22; (i •$• THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. Ps. xxxi. 7). And, lastly, I think, the clause' might be rendered : a doctrine of Vanities^ of mere wood, it — their religion — is I ' This supreme folly is the " one thing " that discredits all the boasted wisdom of the Chaldeans ; and their folly will hereafter be demonstrated by events (ver. 14). The body of the idol is wood, and outwardly it is decorated with silver and gold and costly apparel ; but the whole and every part of it is the work of man. Silver plate (lit. beaten out) from Tarsliish -from far away Tartessus in Spain — is brought, and gold from Uphaz (Dan. x. 5), the ivork of the smith, and of the hands of the founder — who have beaten out the silver and smelted thti, gold : blue and purple is their clothing (Ex. xxvi. 31, ^xxviii. 8): the work of the wise — of skilled artists (Isa. xl. 20) — is every part of them. Possibly the verse might better be translated : Silver to be beaten out — argentum malleo diducendum — which is brought from Tarsliish, and gold which is brought from Uphaz, are the work of the smith and of the hands of the smelter ; the blue and purple which are their clothing, are the work of the ivise all of them. At all events, the point of the verse seems to be that, whether you look at the inside or the outside of the idol, his heart of wood or his casing of gold and silver and his gorgeous robes, the whole and every bit of him as he stands before you is a manufactured article, the work of men's hands. The supernatural comes in nowhere. In sharpest contrast with this lifeless fetish, lahvah is a God that is truth, i.e., a true God (cf. Prov. xxii. 21), or lahvah is God in truth — is really God — He is a ' It is against usage to divide the clause as Naegelsbach does, "Vain instruction! It is wood!" or to render with Ewald "Simply va'n doctrine is the wood ! " which would require the article (ha'cf). li X. I-I6.1 irKATirPN mors and !snaf.i:s con. 2.11 f livinf[ Ci(uf, muf an ftrninf Kiyig ; the sovcrtM'pn whose rule is independent of tlic vicissitiuies of time, and the caprices of temporal creatures : at His 'a or.' :• to bring about a reversal of the policy of ref' rii . and a return to the old system ; and certainly sug/ sting that the heart of the nation, as a whole, vas disloyal to its Heavenly King, and that its ren< ,v:d apostasy was a 'vicked disavowal of lawful allegiance, and an act of unpardonable treason against God. But the word further signifies that a bond has been entered into, a bond which is the exact antithesis of the covenant with lahvah ; and it implies that this bond has about it a fatal strength and permanence, involving as its necessary consequence the ruin of the nation. Breaking covenant with lahvah meant making a cove- nant with other gods ; it was impossible to do the one thing without the other. And that is as true now, under totally different conditions, as it was in the land of Judah, twenty- four centuries ago. If you have broken faith with God in Christ, it is because you have entered into an agreement wth another ; it is because you have foolishly taken the tempter at his word, and accepted his conditions, and surrendered to his pro- 17 258 THE PKOrHRCIES OF JEREMIAH. l!i posals, and preferred his promises to the promises of God. It is because, against all reason, against con- science, against the Holy Spirit, against the witness of God's Word, against the witness of His Saints and Confessors in all ages, you have believed that a Being less than the Eternal God could ensure your weal and make you happy. And now your heart is no longer at unity in itself, and your allegiance is no longer single and undivided. Many as thy cities are thy gods become, O Judah ! The soul that is not unified and harmonized by the fear of the One God, is torn and distracted by a thousand contending passions : and vainl> seeks peace and deliverance by worship at a thousand unholy shrines. But Mammon and Belial and Ashtardth and the whole rout of unclean spirits, whose seductions have lured you astray, will fail you at last ; and in the hour of bitter need, you will learn too late that there is no god but God, and no peace nor safety nor joy but in Him. It is futile to pray for those who have deliberately cast oflF the covenant of lahvah, and made a covenant with His adversary. Intercede not for this people ^ nor lift up outcry and intercession for them ! Prayer cannot save, nothing can save, the impenitent ; and there is a state of mind, in which one's own prayer is turned into sin ; the state of mind in which a man prays, merely to appease God, and escape the fire, but without a thought of forsaking sin, without the faintest aspiration after holiness. There is a degree of guilt upon which sentence is already passed, which is " unto death," and for which intercession is interdicted alike by the Apostle of the New as to the prophet of the Old Covenant. What availeth it My beloved, that she fulfilkth her \ xi., xii.] 77//? liUOh'EN COVRNANr, 259 intent in Mine iiousc. / Can vows nnne and uttered by Divine authority may be ascribed directly to God Himself. And regarded in the Ught of the prophet's commission " to pluck up and to break down, and to destroy and to overthrow, to build and to plant'' nations and kingdoms (i. 10), all that is In re said may be taken to be the prophet's own deliverance concerning his country. This, at all events, is the case with verses 12, 13. What ! do I see my domain {all) vitl/itrcs {and) hyenas ?^ Are vultmrs all around her ? Go ye, assemble all (he beasts of the field! Bring them to devour (vei 9). The questions express astonishment at an unlooked-for and unwelcome spectacle. The loss of Divine favour has exposed Judah to the active hostility of man ; and her neighbours eagerly fall upon her, like birds and beasts of prey, swarming over a helpless quarry. It is so the prophet puts it— it is as if a proclamation had gone forth to the vvolves and jackals of the desert, bidding them come and devour the fallen carcase.'' In another orm ; he speaks of the heathen as "devouring Jacob" (x. 25). The people of lahvah are their natural prey (Ps. xiv. 4 : " who eat up My people as they eat bread ") ; but they are not suffered to devour them, until they have forfeited His protection. ' Lit. "Is my doinuin vultures, hyenas, to inc?'' The, dative ex- presses th<" interest of tiie speaiter in the fact (dat. ethic.). 'Ihe Ileb. term yi3Vonly occurs herr. It is tl..: Arabic dhabn, " hyena " (so Sept. ). St. Jerome rendc is avis t/iscolor. So tlie Turguin : " a .strewn " "sprinkled," or "spottc il fowl." '^ The ref«;renres to "birds of prey," "beasts of the field," and "spoilers" (ver. i .'), are interpreted by the phrase " mine evil luigh- bours" (vcr. 14); and tuit> couiilitutcti a link between vv. 7- 14 and 14-17. 18 ^ ^ ^7^%^ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) 4 ^^^^% < <;? A f/. % 1.0 1^ US ISA 1^ 1^ 1^ 11112.2 us I.I !.«' H^ 1.6 11.25 llll 1.4 V] <^ /i -a ^. 7 Photographic Sciences Corporation 33 WEST MAIN STREET WEBSTER, N.Y. 14580 (716) B72-4S03 .^ ^ o LV 6^ '<^ ^% i : r 274 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. The image is rnw exchanged for another, which approximates more nearly to the fact pourtrayed. Many shepherds have marred My vineyard; they have trodden down My portion ; they have turned My pleasant portion into a desolate wilderness. He (the foe, the in- strument of this ruin) hath made it a desolation; tt mourneth against Me, being desolate; desolated is all the land, for there is no man that giveth heed (vv. 10, 1 1 ). As in an earlier discourse, ch. vi. 3, the invaders are now compared to hordes of nomad shepherds, who enter the land with their flocks and herds, and make havoc of the crops and pastures. From time immemorial the wandering Bedawis have been a terror to the settled peasantry of the East, whose way of life they despise as ignoble and unworthy of free men. Of this traditional enmity we perhaps hear a far-off echo in the story of Cain the tiller of the ground and Abel the keeper of sheep ; and certainly in the statement that " every shepherd was an abomina- tion unto the Egyptians " (Gen. xlvi. 34). The picture of utter desolateness, which the prophet suggests by a fourfold repetition, is probably sketched from a scene which he had himself witnessed ; if it be not rather a representation of the actual condition of the country at the time of his writing. That the latter is the case might naturally be inferred from a consideration of the whole passage ; and the twelfth verse seems to lend much support to this view : Over all bare hills in the wilderness have come ravagers; for lahvah hath a devouring sword: from land's end to land's end no flesh hath peace} The language indeed recalls that ' Such seems to be the best punctuation of the sentence. It involves the transfer oi Athnach to H/Dfe?. xi., xii.] THE BROKEN COVENANT. 275 of ch. iv. lo, 1 1 ; and the entire description might be taken as an ideal picture of the ruin that must ensue upon Jahvah's rejection of the land and people, especially if the closing verses (14-17) be considered as a later addition to the prophecy, made in the light of accom- plished facts. But, upon the whole, it would seem to be more probable that the prophet is here reading the moral of present or recent experience. He affirms (ver. 11) that the affliction of the country is really a punishment for the religious bUndness of the nation : there is no man that layeth to heart the Divine teaching of events as interpreted by himself (cf. ver. 4). The fact that we are unable, in the scantiness of the re- cords of the time, to specify the particular troubles to which allusion is made, is no great objection to this view, which is at least effectively illustrated by the brief statement of 2 Kings xxiv. 2. The reflexion appended in ver. 13 points in the same direction : They have sown wheat, and have reaped thorns; they have put themselves to pain (or, exhausted themselves) without profit, (or, made themselves sick with unprofit- able toil); and they are ashamed of their^ produce (ingatherings), through the heat of the wrath of lahvah. When the enemy had ravaged the crops, thorns would naturally spring up on the wasted lands J and " the heat of the wrath of lahvah " appears to have been further manifested in a parching drought, which ruined what the enemy had left untouched (ver. 4, ch. xiv.). Thus, then, Jeremiah receives the answer to his doubts in a painfully visible demonstration of what the wrath of lahvah means. It means drouglit and ' So the LXX. This agrees better with the context than " So be ye ashamed oiyour fruits." 276 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. famine ; it means the exposure of the country, naked and defenceless, to the will of rapacious and vindictive enemies. For lahvah's wrongs are far deeper and more bitter than the prophet's. The misdeeds of individuals are lighter in the balance than the sins of a nation ; the treachery of a few persons on a particular occasion is as nothing beside the faithlessness of many generations. The partial evils, therefore, under which the country groans, can only be taken as indications of a far more complete and terrible destruction reserved for final impenitence. The perception of this truth, we may suppose, sufficed for the time to silence the prophet's complaints ; and in the revulsion of feeling inspired by the awfu* vision of the unimpeded outbreak of Divine wrath, he utters an oracle con- cerning his country's destroyers, in which retributive justice is tempered by compassion and mercy. Thus hath Jehovah said, Upon all Mine evil neighbours, who touch the heritage which I caused My people Israel to inherit : Lo I am about to uproot (i. 10) them from off their own land, and the house of Judah will I uproot from their midst. And after I have uprooted them, I will have compassion on them again, and will restore them each to their own heritage and their own land. And if they truly learn the ways of My people, to swear by My name, * as lahvah liveth ! ' even as they taught My people to swear by the Baal; they shall be rebuilt in the midst of My people. And if they will not hear, I will uproot that nation, utterh and fatally ; it is an oracle of lahvah (14-17), The preceding section (vv. 7-14), as we have seen, rapidly yet vividly sketches the calami- ties which have ensued and must further ensue upon the Divine desertion of the country. lahvah has for- saken the land, left her naked to her enemies, for her xi., xii.] THE BROKEN COVENANT. 277 causeless, capricious, thankless revolt against her Divine Lord. In this forlorn, defenceless condition, all manner of evils befall her; the vineyards and cornfields are ravaged, the goodly land is desolated, by hordes of savage freebooters pouring in from the eastern deserts. These invaders are called lahvah's " evil neighbours ; " an expression which implies, not individuals banded together for purposes of brigandage, but hostile nations.* Upon these nations also will the justice of God be vindicated ; for that justice is universal in its operation, and cannot therefore be restricted to Israel. Judgment must " begin at the house of God ; " but it will not end there. The " evil neighbours," the surrounding heathen kingdoms, have been lahvah's instruments for the chastisement of His rebellious people ; but they are not on that account exempted from recompense. They too must reap what they have sown. They have in- sulted lahvah, by violating His territory ; they have indulged their malice and treachery and rapacity, in utter disregard of the rights of neighbours, and the moral claims of kindred peoples. As they have done, so shall it be done unto them : ApdaavTL iraOelv. They have laid hands on the possessions of their neighbour, and their own shall be taken from them ; / am about to uproot them from off their own land (cf. Amos i. 3- ii. 3). And not only so, but the house of Judah will I pluck up from their midst. The Lord's people shall be no more exposed to their unneighbourly ill-will ; the butt of their ridicule, the victim of their malice, will be removed to a foreign soil as well as they ; but oppressed and oppressors will no longer be together ; their new • As Hitzig has observed, only a people, or a king, ot a nationa god, could be spoken of as a " neighbour " to the God of Israel. 379 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. settlements will lie far apart ; under the altered state of things, under the shadow of the great conqueror of the future, there will be no opportunity for the old injurious dealings. All alike, Judah and the enemies of Judah, will be subject to the will of the foreign lord. But that is not the end. The Judge of all the earth is merciful as well as just. He is loth to blot whole peoples out of existence, even though they have merited destruction by grievous and prolonged transgression of His laws. Therefore banishment will be followed by restoration, not in the case of Judah only, but of all the expa- triated peoples. After enduring the Divine probation of adversity, they will be brought again, by the Divine compassion, " each to their own heritage and their own land." And then, if they will profit by the teaching of lahvah's prophets, and " learn the ways," that is, the religion of His people, making their supreme appeal to lahvah, as the fountain of all truth and the sovran vindicator of right and justice, as hitherto they have appealed to the Baal, and misled Israel into the same profane and futile course; then "they shall be built up," or rebuilt, or brought to great and ever- growing prosperity, "in the midst of My people." Such is to be the blessing of the Gentiles ; they shall share in the glorious future that awaits repentant Israel. The present condition of things is to be completely reversed: now Judah sojourns in their midst; then they will be surrounded on every side by the emanci- pated and triumphant people of God : now they beset Judah with jealousies, suspicions, enmities ; then Judah will embrace them all with the arms of an unselfish and protecting love. A last word of warning is added. The doom of the nation that will not accept the Divine teaching will be utter and absolute extermination. xi., xii.] THE BROKEN COVENANT. 279 The forecast is plainly of a Messianic nature ; it recognises in lahvah the Saviour, not of a nation, but of the world. It perceives that the disunion and mutual hatred of peoples, as of individuals, is a breach of Divine law ; and it proclaims a general return to God, and submission to His guidance in all political as well as private affairs, as the sole cure for the numberless evils that flow from that hatred and dis- union. It is only when men have learnt that God is their common Father and Lord, that they come to see with the clearness and force of practical conviction that they themselves are all members of one family, bound as such to mutual offices of kindness and charity ; it is only when there is a conscious identity of interest with all our fellows, based upon the recognition that all alike are children of God and heirs of eternal life, that true freedom and universal brotherhood become possible for man. ti VIII. THE FALL OF PRIDE. Jeremiah xiii. THIS discourse is a sort of appendix to the pre- ceding ; as is indicated by its abrupt and brief beginning with the words " Thus said lahvah unto me," without the addition of any mark of time, or other determining circumstance. It predicts captivity, in retribution for the pride and ingratitude of the people ; and thus suitably follows the closing section of the last address, which announces the coming deportation of Judah and her evil neighbours. The recurrence here (ver. 9) of the peculiar term rendered "swelHng" or "pride" in our English versions (ch. xii. 5), points to the same conclusion. We may sub- divide it thus : It presents us with (i) a symbolical action, or acted parable, with its moral and application (vv. i-ii); (ii) a parabolic saying and its interpre- tation, which leads up to a pathetic appeal for penitence (vv. 12-17); (iii) a message to the sovereigns (vv. 18, 19); and (iv) a closing apostrophe to Jerusalem — the gay and guilty capital, so soon to be made desolate for her abounding sins (vv. 20-27). In the first of these four sections, we are told how the prophet was bidden of God to buy a linen girdle, and after wearing it for a time, to bury it in a cleft of / i xiii.] THE FALL OF PRIDE. 281 \ / the rock at a place wliose very name might be taken to symbolize the doom awaiting his people. A long while afterwards he was ordered to go and dig it up again, and found it altogether spoiled and useless. The significance of these proceedings is clearly enough explained. The relation between Israel and the God of Israel had been of the closest kind. lahvah had chosen this people, and bound it to Himself by a covenant, as a man might bind a girdle about his body ; and as the girdle is an ornament of dress, so had the Lord intended Israel to display His glory among men (ver. 11). But now the girdle is rotten; and like that rotten girdle will He cause the pride of Judah to rot and perish (vv. 9, 10). It is natural to ask, whether Jeremiah really did as he relates ; or whether the narrative about the girdle be simply a literary device intended to carry a lesson home to the dullest apprehension. If the prophet's activity had been confined to the pen ; if he had not been wont to labour by word and deed for the attain- ment of his purposes ; the latter alternative might be accepted. For mere readers, a parabolic narrative might suffice to enforce his meaning. But Jeremiah, who was all his life a man of action, probably did the thing he professes to have done, not in thought nor in word only, but in deed and to the knowledge of certain competent witnesses. There was nothing novel in this method of attracting attention, and giving greater force and impressiveness to his prediction. The older prophets had often done the same kind of things, on the principle that aeeds may be more effective than words. What could have conveyed a more vivid sense of the Divine intention, than the simple act of Ahijah the Shilonite, when he suddenly caught away the new rjL sSi THE PROPHECrRS OF /EREMIAH. mantle of Solomon's officer, and rent it into twelve pieces, and said to the astonished courtier, " Take thee ten pieces ! for thus said lahvah, the God of Israel, Behold I am about to rend the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon, and will give the ten tribes to thee " ? (l Kings xi. 29 sqq.) In like manner, when Ahab and Jehoshaphat, dressed in their robes of state, sat enthroned in the gateway of Samaria, and " all the prophets were prophesying before them " about the issue of their joint expedition to Ramoth-gilead, Zedekiah, the son of a Canaanitess — as the writer is careful to add of this false prophet — " made him horns of iron and said, Thus said lahvah, With these shalt thou butt th^ Arameans, until thou make an end of them" (i Kings xxii. 11). Isaiah, Hosea, and Ezekiel, record similar actions of symbolical import. Isaiah for a time walked half-clad and barefoot, as a sign that the Egyptians and Ethiopians, upon whom Judah was inclined to lean, would be led away captive, in this comfortless guise, by the king of Assyria (Isa. xx.). Such actions may be regarded as a further develop- ment of those significant gestures, with which men in what is called a state of nature are wont to give emphasis and precision to their spoken ideas. They may also be compared with the symbolism of ancient law. " An ancient conveyance," we are told, " was not written but acted. Gestures and words took the place of written technical phraseology, and any formula mispronounced, or symbolical act omitted, would have vitiated the proceeding as fatally as a material mistake in stating the uses or setting out the remainders would, two hundred years ago, have vitiated an English deed." (Maine, Ancient Law, p. 276.) Actions of a purely symbolical nature surprise us, when we first encounter xiii.] THE FALL OF FRLDE. 2S3 them in Religion or Law, but tiiat is only because tiiey are survivals. In the ages when they originated, they were familiar occurrences in all transactions between man and man. And this general consideration tends to prove that those expositors arc wrong who main- tain that the prophets did not really perform the symbolical actions of which they .speak. Just as it is argued that the visions which they describe, are merely a literary device ; so the reality of these symbolical actions has needlessly enough been called in question. The learned Jews Abenezra and Maimonides in the twelfth century, and David Kimchi in the thirteenth, were the first to affirm this opinion. Maimonides held that all such actions passed in vision before the prophets ; a view which has found a modern advocate in Hengstenberg : and Staudlin, in the last century, affirmed that they had neither an objective nor a sub- jective reality, but were simply a " literary device." This, however, is only true, if true at all, of the declin- ing period of prophecy, as in the case of the visions. In the earlier period, while the prophets were still accustomed to an oral delivery of their discourses, we may be quite sure that they suited the action to the word in the way that they have themselves recorded ; in order to stir the popular imagination, and to create a more vivid and lasting impression. The narratives of the historical books leave no doubt about the matter. But in later times, when spoken addresses had for the most part become a thing of the past, and when prophets published their convictions in manuscript, it is possible that they were content with the description of symbolical doings, as a sort of parable, without any actual performance of them. Jeremiah's hiding his girdle in a cleft of the rock at " Euphrates " has been 284 V THE PROPIIECIRS OF JEREMIAH, icgardccl by sonu* vvritrrs as an instance (^f such piiitly ideal symbolism. And certainly it is difliLult to suppose that the prophet made the long and arduous journey from Jerusalem to the Great River for such a purpose. It is, however, a highly probable conjecture that the place whither he was directed to repair was much nearer home ; the addition of a single letter to the name rendered " Euphrates" gives the far preferable reading " Ephrath," that is to say, Bethlehem in Judah (Gen. xlviii. 7). Jeremiah may very well have buried his girdle at Bethlehem, a place only five miles or so to the south of Jerusalem ; a place, moreover, where he would have no trouble in finding a " cleft of the rock," which would hardly be the case upon the alluvial banks of the Euphrates. If not accidental, the difference may be due to the intentional employment of an unusual form of the name, by way of hinting at the source whence the ruin of Judah was to flow. The enemy " from the north " (ver. 20) is of course the Chal- deans. The mention of the queen-mother (ver. 18) along with the king appears to point unmistakably to the reign of Jehoiachin or Jechoniah. The allusion is compared with the threat of ch. xxii. 26 : "I will cast thee out, and thy mother that bare thee into another country." Like Josiah, this king was but eight years old when he began to reign (2 Chron. xxxvi. 9, after which 2 Kings xxiv. 8 must be corrected) ; and he had enjoyed the name of king only for the brief period of three months, when the thunderbolt fell, and Nebuchad- rezzar began his first siege of Jerusalem. The boy- king can hardly have had much to do with the issue of affairs, when " he and his mother and his servants and his princes and his eunuchs " surrendered the city, and n/ xiii.] THE FAl.l. OF PKll^R. 285 were deported to Babylon, witli ten thousand of the principal inhabitants (2 Kings xxiv. 12 AV/y.). The date of our discourse will- thus be the beginning of the year B.C. 599, which was the eiglith year of Nebuchadrezzar (2 Kings xxiv. 12). It is asserted, indeed, that the difficult verse 21 refers to the revolt from Babylon as an accomplished fact ; but this is by no means clear from the verse itself. What wilt thou say, demands the prophet, zvhen He shall appoint over thee — albeit, thou thyself hast instructed them against thyself; — lovers to he thy head ? The term "lovers" or "lemans" applies best to the foreign idols, who will one day repay the foolish attachment of lahvah's people by enslaving it (cf. ch. iii. 4, where lahvah himself is called the " lover " of Judah's youthful days); and this question might as well have been asked in the days of Josiah, as at any later period. At various times in the past Israel and Judah had courted the favour of foreign deities. Ahaz had introduced Aramean and Assyrian novelties; Manasseh and Amon had revived and aggravated his apostasy. Even Hezekiah had had friendly dealings with Babylon, and we must remember that in those times friendly intercourse with a foreign people implied some recognition of their gods, which is probably the true account of Solomon's chapels for Tyrian and other deities. The queen of ver. 1 8 might conceivably be Jedidah, the mother of Josiah, for that king was only eight at his accession, and only thirty-nine at his death (2 Kings xxii. i). And the message to the sovereigns (ver. 18) is not couched in terms of disrespect nor of reproach : it simply declares the imminence of overwhelming disaster, and bids them lay aside their royal pomp, and 286 « PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. behave as mourners for the coming woe. Such words might perhaps have been addressed to Josiah and his mother, by way of deepening the impression produced by the Book of the Law, and the rumoured invasion of the Scythians. But the threat against " the kings that sit on David's throne" (ver. 13) is hardly suitable on this supposition ; and the ruthless tone of this part of the address — / will dash them in pieces^ one against another, both the fathers and the sons together: I will not pity, nor spare, nor relent from destroying them — considered along with the emphatic prediction of an utter and entire captivity (ver. 19), seems to indicate a later period of the prophet's ministry, when the obdu- racy of the people had revealed more fully the hope- lessness of his enterprise for their salvation. The mention of the enemy " from the north " v/ill then be a reference to present circumstances of peril, as trium- phantly vindicating the prophet's former menaces of destruction from that quarter. The carnage of conquest and the certainty of exile are here threatened in the plainest and most direct style ; but nothing is said by way of heightening the popular terror of the coming destroyer. The prophet seems to take it for granted that the nature of the evil which hangs over their hf ids, is well known to the people, and does not need to be dwelt upon or amplified with the lyric fervour of former utterances (see ch. iv., v. 15 sqq., vi. 22 sqq.). This appears quite natural, if we suppose that the first invasion of the Chaldeans was now a thing of the past ; and that the nation was awaiting in trembling uncertainty the consequences of Jehoiakim's breach of faith with his Babylonian suzerain (2 Kings xxiv. i. 10). The prophecy may therefore be assigned with some confidence to the short reign of Jehoiachin, to which xiii.] THE FALL OF PRIDE. 287 perhaps the short section, ch. x. 17-25, also belongs; a date which harmonizes better than any other with the play on the name Euphrates in the opening of the chapter. It agrees, too, with the emphatic lahvah hath spoken! (ver. 15), which seems to be more than a mere assertion of the speaker's vera- city, and to point rather to the fact that the course of events had risached a crisis ; that something had occurred in the political world, which suggested imminent danger; that a black cloud was looming up on the national horizon, and signalling unmistakably to the prophet's eye the intention of lahvah. What other view so well explains the solemn tone of warning, the vivid apprehension of danger, the beseeching tenderness, that give so peculiar a stamp to the three verses in which the address passes from narrative and parable, to direct appeal? Hear ye and give hear: be not proud: for lahvah hath spoken ! Give glory to lahvah your God — the glory of confession, of avowing your own guilt and His perfect righteousness (Josh. vii. 19 ; St. John ix. 24) ; of recognising the due reward of your deeds in the destruction that threatens you ; the glory involved in the cry, "God be merciful to me a sinner ! " — Give glory to lahvah your God,^ before the darkness fall, and before your feet stumble upon the twi- light mountains; and ye wait for dawn, and He make it deepest gloom, He turn it to utter darkness. The day was declining ; the evening shadows were descending and deepening ; soon the hapless people would be wandering bewildered in the twilight, and lost in the darkness, unless, ere it had become too late, they would yield their pride, and throw themselves upon the pity of Him who "maketh the seven stars and Orion, and turneth the deepest gloom into the morning " (Amos v. 8). 288 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. The verbal allusiveness of the opening section does not, according to Oriental taste, diminish the solemnity of the speaker ; on the contrary, it tends to deepen the impression produced by his words. And perhaps there is a psychological reason for the fact, beyond the peculiar partiality of Oriental peoples for such displays of ingenuity. It is, at all events, remarkable that the greatest of all masters of human feeling has not hesi- tated to make a dying prince express his bitter and desponding thoughts in what may seem an artificial toying and trifling with the suggestiveness of his own familiar name ; and when the king asks : " Can sick men play so nicely with their names ? " the answer is : " No, misery makes sport to mock itself." (Rich. II., Act 2, Sc. i., 72 sqq^ The Greek tragedian, too, in the earnestness of bitter sport, can find a prophecy in a name. " Who was for naming her thus, with truth so entire ? (Was it One whom we see not, wielding tonqjue happily with full foresight of what was to be ?) the Bride of Battles, fiercely contested Helen : seeing that, in full accord with her name, haler of ships, haler of men, haler of cities, forth of the soft and precious tapestries away she sailed, under the gale of the giant West" (iEsch., Ag.^ 681 sqq^. And so, to Jeremiah's ear, Ephrath is prophetic of Euphrates, upon whose distant banks the glory of his people is to languish and decay. " I to Ephrath, and you to Phrath ! " is his melancholy cry. Their doom is as certain as if it were the mere fulfilment of an old-world prophecy, crystal- lized long ages ago in a familiar name; a word of destiny fixed in this strange form, and bearing its solemn witness from the outset of their history until now concerning the inevitable goal. There is nothing so very surprising, as Ewald Sieems xiii.] THE FALL OF PRIDE. 289 to have thought, in the suggestion that the Perath of the Hebrew text may be the same as Ephrath. But perhaps the valley and spring now called Furah (or Furdt) which lies at about the same distance N.E. of Jerusalem, is the place intended by the prophet. The name, which means fresh or sweet ivater is identical with the Arabic name of the Euphrates {Fttrdt, ol>)» which again is philologically identical with the Hebrew Perath. It is obvious that this place would suit the requirements of the text quite as well as the other, while the coincidence of name enables us to dispense with the supposition of an unusual form or even a corruption of the original ; but Furat or Forah is not mentioned elsewhere in the Old Testament. The old versions send the prophet to the river Euphrates, which Jeremiah calls simply " The River " in one place (ii. 18), and " The river of Perath " in three othe. s (xlvi. 2, 6, 10) ; while the rare " Perath," without any addition, is only found in the second account of the Creation (Gen. ii. 14), in 2 Chron. xxxv. 20, and in a passage of this book which does not belong, nor profess to belong, to Jeremiah (Ii. 63). We may, therefore, conclude that " Perath " in the present passage means not the great river of that name, but a place near Jerusalem, although that place was probably chosen with the intention, as above explained, of alluding to the Euphrates. I cannot assent to the opinion which regards this narrative of the spoiled girdle as founded upon some accidental experience of the prophet's life, in which he afterwards recogniseu a Divine lesson. The precision of statement, and the nice adaptation of the details of the story to the moral which the prophet wished to convey, rather indicate a symbolical course of action, or what may be called an acted parable. The whole 19 290 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. proceeding appears to have been carefully thought out beforehand. The intimate connexion between lahvah and Israel is well symbolized by a girdle — that part of an Eastern dress which " cleaves to the loins of a man," that is, fits closest to the body, and is most securely attached thereto. And if the nations be represented by the rest of the apparel, as the girdle secures and keeps that in its place, we may see an implication that Israel was intended to be the chain that bound mankind to God. The girdle was of linen^ the material of the priestly dress, not only because Jeremiah was a priest, but because Israel was called to be " a kingdom of priests," or the Priest among nations (Ex. xix. 6). The significance of the command to wear the girdle, but not to put it into water, seems to be clear enough. The unwashed garment which the prophet continues to wear for a time represents the foulness of Israel ; just as the order to bury it at Perath indicates what lahvah is about to do with His polluted people. The exposition begins with the words. Thus will I mar the great pride of Judah and of Jerusalem ! The spiritual uncleanness of the nation consisted in the proud selfwill which turned a deaf ear to the warnings of lahvah's prophets, and obstinately per- sisted in idolatry (ver. lo). It continues : For as the girdle cleaveth to the loins of a man, so made I the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Judah to cleave unto Me, saith lahvah; that they might become to Me for a people, and for a name, and for a praise, and for an ornament (Ex. xxviii. 2). Then their becoming morally unclean, through the defilements of sin, is briefly imphed in the words. And they obeyed not (ver. 11). It is not the pride of the tyrant king Jehoiakim that xiii,] THE FALL OF PRIDE. 291 is here threatened with destruction. It is the national pride which had all along evinced itself in rebellion against its heavenly King — the great pride of Judah ana Jerusalem; and this pride, inasmuch as it "trusted in man and made flesh its arm" (xvii. 5), and boasted in a carnal wisdom, and material strength and riches (ix. 23, xxi. 13), was to be brought low by the com- plete extinction of the national autonomy, and the reduction of a high-spirited and haughty race to the status of humble dependents upon a heathen power. 2. A parabolic saying follows, with its interpreta- tion. And say thou unto them this word : Thus said lahvah, the God of Israel: Every jar is wont to be filled (or shall be filled) ivith wine. And if they say unto thee, Are we really not aware that every jar is wont to be filled with wine ? say thou unto them. Thus said lahvahj Lo, I am about to fill all the inhabitants of this land, and the kings that sit for David upon his throne, and the priests and the prophets, and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, with drunkenness ; and I wiL dash them in pieces against one another, and the fathers and the sons together, saith lahvah : I will not forbear nor spare nor pity, so as not to mar them (cf. vv. 7, 9). The individual members of the nation, of all ranks and classes, are compared to earthenware jars, not "skins," as the LXX. gives it, for they are to be dashed in pieces, " like a potter's vessel " (Ps. ii. 9 ; cf. ver. 14). ^ Regarding them all as ripe for destruction, Jeremiah exclaims, " Every jar is filled with wine," in the ordinary course of things ; that is its destiny. His hearers answer with the mocking question, " Do you suppose that we don't know that ? " They would, of course, Also xlviii. 12; Lam. iv. 2 ; Isa. xxx. 14. 292 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. be aware that a prophet's figure, however homely, covered an inner meaning of serious import ; but deri- sion was their favourite retort against unpopular truths (xvii. 15, XX. 7, 8). They would take it for granted that the thing suggested was unfavourable, from their past experience of Jeremiah. Their ill-timed banter is met by the instant application of the figure. They, and the kings then sitting on David's throne, i.e., the young Jehoiachin and the queen-mother Nehushta (who pro- bably had all the authority if not the title of a regent), and the priests and prophets who fatally misled them by false teachings and false counsels, are the wine-jars intended, and the wine that is to fill them is the wine of the wrath of God (Ps. Ixxv. 8 ; Jer. xxv. 15; cf. li. 7 ; Rev. xvi. 19; Isa. xix. 14, 15J. The effect is intoxica- tion — a fatal bewilderment, a helpless lack of decision, an utter confusion and stupefaction of the faculties of wisdom and foresight, in the very moment of supreme peril (cf. Isa. xxviii. 7 ; Ps. Ix. 5). Like drunkards, they will reel against and overthrow each other. The strong term / will dash them in pieces is used, to indicate the deadly nature of their fall, and because the prophet has still in his mind the figure of the wine-jars, which were probably amphorae, pointed at the jnd, like those depicted in Egyptian mural paintings, so that they could not stand upright without support. By their fall they are to be utterly "marred " (the term used of the girdle, ver. 9). But even yet one way of escape lies open. It is to sacrifice their pride, and yield to the will of lahvah. Hear ye, and give ear, be not haughty ! for lahvah hath spoken : give ye to lahvah your God the glory, before it grow dark (or He cause darkness), and be- fore your feet stumble upon mountains of twilight; and xiii,] THE FALL OF PRIDE. 293 ye wait for the dawnj and He make it gloom, turning it to cloudiness ! (Isa. v. 30, viii. 20, 22 ; Amos viii. 9). It is very remarkable, that even now, when the Chaldeans are actually in the country, and blockad- ing the strong places of southern Judah (ver. 19), which was the usual preliminary to an advance upon Jerusalem itself (2 Chron. xii. 4, xxxii. 9 ; Isa. xxxvi. I, 2), Jeremiah should still speak thus ; assuring his fellow- citizens that confession and self-humiliation before their offended God might yet deliver them from the bitterest consequences of past misdoing. lahvah had indeed spoken audibly enough, as it seemed to the prophet, in the calamities that had already befallen the country ; these were an indication of more and worse to follow, unless they should prove efficacious in leading the people to repentance. If they failed, nothing would be left for the prophet but to mourn in solitude over his country's ruin (ver. 17). But Jeremiah was fully per- suaded that the Hand that had stricken could heal ; the Power that had brought the invaders into Judah, could cause them to " return by the way that they had come " (Isa. xxxvii. 34). Of course such a view is unintel- ligible from the standpoint of unbelief; but then the standpoint of the prophets is faith. 3. After this general appeal for penitence, the dis- course turns to the two exalted persons whose position and interest in the country were the highest of all, the youthful king, and the empress or queen-mother. They are addressed in a tone which, though not dis- respectful, is certainly despairing. They are called upon, not so much to set the example of penitence (cf. Jonah iii. 6), as to take up the attitude of mourners (Job ii. 13; Isa. iii. 26; Lam. ii. 10; Ezek. xxvi. 16) in presence of the public disasters. Say thou to the 294 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. king and to the empress, Sit ye low on the i^roiind ! (lit. make low your seat ! cf. Isa. vii. for the construction) for it is fallen from your heads * — your beautiful crown ! (Lam. V. 1 6). The cities of the south are shut fast, and there is none that openeth (Josh. vi. l): Judah is carried away captive all of her, she is wholly carried away. There is no hope ; it is vain to expect help ; nothing is left but to bemoan the irreparable. The siege of the great fortresses of the scuth country and the sweeping away of the rural population were sure signs of what was coming upon Jerusalem. The embattled cities themselves may be suggested by the fallen crown of beauty ; Isaiah calls Samaria " the proud crown of the drunkards of Ephraim " (Isa. xxviii. l), and cities are commonly represented in ancient art by female figures wearing murpl crowns. In that case, both verses are addressed to .he sovereigns, and the second is exegetical of the first. A~ already observed, there is here no censure, but only sorrowful despair over the dark outlook. In the same way, Jeremiah's utterance (xxii. 20 sqq.) about the fate of Jehoiachin is less a malediction than a lament. And when we further consider his favourable judgment of the first body of exiles, who were carried away with this monarch soon after the time of the present oracle (chap, xxiv,), we may perhaps see reason to conclude that the surrender of Jerusalem to the Chaldeans on this occasion was partly due to his advice. The narrative of Kings, however, is too brief to enable us to come to any certain decision about the circumstances of Jehoiachin's submission (2 Kings xxiv. 10-12). 'LXX. dirb Kt(l>a\m vn&v. Read DDWNip = Dp*K>NnD; and cf. Assyrian restt, plur. rt^etu ( •= fllEJ'N^). Xlll ii.] THE FALL OF PRIDE. 295 4. From the sovereigns, the prophet turns to Jeru- salem. Lift up thine eyes (O Jerusalem^), and behold them that came from the north ! Where is the flock that was given to thee, thy beautiful sheep ? What wilt thou say when He shall appoint over thee — nay, thou thyself hast spurred them against thyself! — lovers (iii. 4, xi. 19) for head ? Will not pangs take thee, as a woman in travail? Jerusalem sits upon her hills, as a beautiful shepherdess. The country towns and un walled villages lay about her, like a fair flock of sheep and goats entrusted to her care and .ceeping. But now these have been destroyed and their pastures are made a silent solitude, and the destroyer is advancing against herself. What pangs of shame and terror will be hers, when she recognises in the enemy triumphing over her grievous downfall the heathen " friends " whose love she had courted so long ! Her sin is to be her scourge. She shall be made the thrall of her foreign lovers, lalivah will " appoint them over her " (xv. 3, li. 27) ; they will become the " head," and she the " tail " (Lam. i. 5 ; Deut. xxviii. 44). Yet this will, in truth, be her own doing, not lahvah's ; she has herself *^ accustomed them to herself" (x. 2), or " instructed " or "spurred them on" against herself (ii. 33, iv. 18). The revolt of Jehoiakim, his wicked breach of faith with ' For DDO^r we might read, with LXX., Vat, D(^Jn-|*) -^yii. The Arabic has Israel. But Vulg. and Targ, agree with the Q'r6, and take the verbs as plur. : " Lift ye up your eyes and see who are coming from the north." The sing. fern, is to be preferred as the more difficult reading, and on account of ver. 21, where it recurs. Jeru- salem is addressed (ver. 27), and ^^ your eyes," plur. masc. pron., may be justified as indicating the collective sense of the fem. sing. The population of the capital is meant. Cf. Mic. i. 1 1 ; Jer. xxi. 13, 14. In ver. 23, the masc. plur. appears again, the figure for a moment being dropped. 296 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH, Nebuchadrezzar, had turned friends to enemies (iv. 30). But the chief reference seems to be more general — the continual craving of Judah for foreign alliances and foreign worships. Ami if thou say in thine hearty " Where- fore did these things befall me ? " through the greatness of thy guilt were thy skirts uncovered, thine heels violated (Nah. iii. 5) or exposed. Will a Cttshite change his skin, or a leopard his spots ? ye, too, are ye able to do good, O ye that are zvont to do evil ? If amid the sharp throes of suffering Jerubalem should still fail to recognise the moral cause of them (v. 19), she may be assured before- hand that her unspeakable dishonour is the reward of her sins ; that is why " the virgin daughter of Sion " is surprised and ravished by the foe (a common figure : Isa. xlvii. 1-3). Sin has become so ingrained in her, that it can no more be eradicated than the blackness of an African skin, or the spots of a leopard's hide. The habit of sinning has become "a second nature," and, hke nature, is not to be expelled (cf. viii. 4-7). The effect of use and wont in the moral sphere could hardly be expressed more forcibly, and Jeremiah's comparison has become a proverb. Custom binds us all in every department of life ; it is only by enlisting this strange influence upon the side of virtue, that we become virtuous. Neither virtue nor vice can be pronounced perfect, until the habit of either has become fixed and invariable. It is the tendency of habitual action of any kind to become automatic ; and it is certain that sin may attain such a mastery over the active powers of a man that its indulgence may become almost an unconscious exercise of his will, and quite a matter of course. But this fearful result of evil habits does not excuse them at the bar of common sense, much less at the tribunal of God. The inveterate xiii.] THE FALL OF Ph'/DE. 297 sinner, the man totally devoid of scruple, whose con- science is, as it were, " seared with a hot iron," is not on that account excused by the common judgment of his kind ; the feeling he excites is not forbearance, but abhorrence ; he is regarded not as a poor victim of circumstances over which he has no control, but as a monster of iniquity. And justly so ; for if he has lost control of his passions, if he is no longer master of himself, but the slave of vice, he is responsible for the long course of self-indulgence which has made him what he is. The prophet's comparison cannot be applied in support of a doctrine of immoral fatalism. The very fact that he makes use of it, implies that he did not intend it to be understood in such a sense. " Will a Cushite change his skin, or a leopard his spots ? Ye also — supposing such a change as that — ivill be able to do good, O ye that are taught — trained, accustomed — to do evil !" (perhaps the preferable rendering). Not only must we abstain from treating a rhetorical figure as a colourless and rigorous proposition of mathematical science ; not only must we allow for the irony and the exaggeration of the preacher : we must also remember his object, which is, if possible, to shock his hearers into a sense of their condition, and to awaken remorse and repentance even at the eleventh hour. His last words (ver. 27) prove that he did not believe this result, improbable as it was, to be altogether impossible. Unless some sense of sin had survived in their hearts, unless the terms, " good " and " evil," had still retained a meaning for his countrymen, Jeremiah would hardly have laboured still so strenu- ously to convince them of their sin. For the present, when retribution is already at the doors, when already the Divine wrath has visibly 298 THE PROrilEClES OF JEREMIAH. broken forth, his prevailing purpose is not so much to suggest a way of escape, as to bring home to the heart and conscience of the nation the true meaning of the public calamities. They are the consequence of habitual rebellion against God, And I will scatter them like stubble passing away to ( = before: cf. xix. lo) the wind of the wilderness. This is thy lot {/em. thine, O Jerusalem), the portion of thy measures (others : lap) from Me, saith lahvah ; because thou forgattest Me, and didst trust in the Lie. And I also — / will surely strip thy skirts to thy face, and thy shame shall be seen ! (Nah. iii. 5). Thine adulteries and thy neighings, the foulness of thy fornications upon the hills in the field (iii. 2-6) — / have seen thine abominations ! (For the construction, compare Isa. i. 13.) Woe unto thee, O Jerusalem! After how long yet wilt thou not become clean ? (2 Kings V. 12, 13). That which lies before the citizens in the near future is not deliverance, but dispersion in foreign lands. The onset of the foe will sweep them away, as the blast from the desert drives before it the dry stubble of the corn-fields (cf. iv. 11, 12). This is no chance calamity, but a recompense allotted and meted out by lahvah to the city that forgot Him and " trusted in the Lie " of Baal-worship and the associated superstitions. The city that dealt shame- fully in departing from her God, and dallying with foul idols, shall be put to shame by Him before all the world (ver. 26 recurring to the thought of ver. 22, but ascribing the exposure directly to lahvah). Woe — certain woe — awaits Jerusalem; and it is but a faint and far-off glimmer of hope that is reflected in the final question, which is like a weary sigh : After how long yet wilt thou not become clean ? How long must the fiery process of cleansing go on, ere thou be purged of thine xiii.] THE FALL OF PRIDE. 299 inveterate bins ? It is a recognition that the punish- ment will not be externiinative ; that God's chastise- ments of His people can no more fail at last than I lis promises ; that the triumph of a heathen power and the disappearance of lahvah's Israel from under His heaven cannot be the final phase of that long eventful history which began with the call of Abraham. IX. THE DROUGHT AND ITS MORAL IMPLICATIONS. Jeremiah xiv., xv. (xvii V). T TAklOUS opinions have been expressed about the V division of these chapters. They have been cut up into short sections, supposed to be more or less inde- pendent of each other ;^ and they have been regarded as constituting a well-organized whole, at least so far as the eighteenth verse of chap. xvii. The truth may lie between these extremes. Chapters xiv., xv. certainly hang together; for in them the prophet represents himself as twice interceding with lahvah on behalf of the people, and twice receiving a refusal of his petition (xi\ t-xv. 4), the latter reply being sterner and more decisive than the first. The occasion was a long period of drought, involving much privation for man and beast. The connexion between the parts of this first portion of the discourse is clear enough. The prophet prays for his people, and God answers that He has rejected them, and that intercession is futile. Thereupon, Jeremiah throws the blame of the national sins upon the false prophets ; and the answer is that both the people and ' HiTZiG : (i) xiv. 1-9, 19-22 : " Lament and Prayer on occasion of a Drought." (2) xiv. 10-18. "Oracle against the false Prophets and the misguided People " (Hitzig mistakes the import of the phrase Vl\h UnN ]D, " Thus have they loved to wanoer ver. lo; supposing xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. 301 their false guides will perish. The prophet then solilo- quises upon his own hard fate as a herald of evil tidings, and receives directions for his own personal guidance in this crisis of affairs (xv. lO-xvi. 9). There is a pause but no real break at the end of chap. xv. The next chapter resumes the subject of directions personally affecting the prophet himself; and the dis- course is then continuous so far as xvii. 18, although, naturally enough, it is broken here and there by pauses of considerable duration, marking transitions of thought, and progress in the argument. The heading of the entire piece is marked in the that the "thus" refers to xiii. 27, and that xiv. 1-9 is misplaced). (3) XV. 1-9. "The incorrigible People will be punished mercilessly." Hitzig thinks C. B. Michaelis wrong in asserting close connexion with the end of the preceding chapter, because the intercession, vv. 2-9, does not agree with the prohibition, xiv. 1 1 ; and because xiv 19-22, merely pravs for cessation of the Drought ; while the rejection of "the hypothetical intercession," xv. I, delivers the people over to all the horrors which follow in the train of war. xv. 1-9 may originallj' have followed xiv. 18. But this is far froir. cogent reason- ing. There is nothing surprising in the renewal of the prophet's intercession, except on a theory of strictly verbal inspiration; and xv. I sqq. in refusing deliverance from the Drought, or rather in answer to the prayer imploring it, announces further and worse evils to follow. (4) " Complaint of the Seer against lahvah, and .Soothing of his Dejection," xv. 10-21. Hitzig thinks internal evidence here points to the fourth year of Jehoiakim ; and that xvii. 1-4 originally preceded this section, especially as ch. xvi. connects closely with xv. 9. (5) xvi. 1-20. " Prediction of an imminent general Judgment by Plague and Captivity." Written immediately after xv. 1-9, and falls with that in the short reign of Jehoiachin. (6) xvii. 1-4. " Judah's unfor- gotten Guilt will be punished by Captivity." Wanting in LXX. (as early as Jerome), but contains original of xv. 13, 14, and must there- fore be genviine. Belongs 602 n.c, year of Jehoiakim's revolt. (7) xvii. 5-18. "The Vindication of Trust in God on Despisers and Believers. Prayer for its Vindication." Date immediately after death of Jehoiakim. (8) 19-27. " Warning to keep the Sabbath." Time of Jehoiachin, original by a peculiar inversion of terms, which meets us again, chap. xlvi. i, xlvii. i, xlix. 34, but which, in spite of this recurrence, wears a rather suspicious look. We might render it thus : " What fell as a word of lahvah to Jeremiah, on account of the droughts" (the plural is intensive, or it signifies the long con- tinuance of the trouble — as if one rainless period followed upon another). Whether or not the singular order of the words be authentic, the recurrence at chap, xvii. 8 of the remarkable term for "drought" (Heb. baccdreth of which baccardth here is plur.) favours the view that that chapter is an integral portion of the present discourse. The exordium (xiv. 1-9) is a poetical sketch of the miseries of man and beast, closing with a beautiful prayer. It has been said that this is not " a word of lahvah to Jeremiah," but rather the reverse. If we stick to the letter, this no doubt is the case ; but, as we have seen in former discourses, the phrase " lahvah's word " meant in prophetic use very much more than a direct message from God, or a pre- diction uttered at the Divine instigation. Here, as elsewhere, the prophet evidently regards the course of his own religious reflexion as guided by Him who "fashioneth the hearts of men," and " knoweth their thoughts long before ; " and if the question had sug- gested itself, he would certainly have referred his own poetic powers — the tenderness of his pity, the vividness of his apprehension, the force of his passion, — to the inspiration of the Lord who had called and consecrated him from the birth, to speak in His Name. There lies at the heart of many of us a feehng, which has lurked there, more or less without our cognisance, ever since the childish days when the Old Testament was read at the mother's knee, and explained and xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. PI understood in a manner proportioned to the faculties of childhood. When we hear the phrase " The Lord spake," we instinctively think, if we think at all, of an actual voice knocking sensibly at the door of the out- ward ear. It was not so; nor did the sacred writer mean it so. A knowledge of Hebrew idiom — the modes of expression usual and possible in that ancient speech —assures us that this statement, so startlingly direct in its unadorned simplicity, was the accepted mode of conveying a meaning which we, in our more complex and artificial idioms, would convey by the use of a multitude of words, in terms far more abstract, in language destitute of all that colour of life and reality which stamps the idiom of the Bible. It is as though the Divine lay farther off from us moderns ; as though the marvellous progress of all that new knowledge of the measureless magnitude of the world, of the power and complexity of its machinery, of the surpassing subtlety and the matchless perfection of its laws and processes, had become an impassable barrier, at least an impenetrable veil, between our minds and God. We have lost the sense of His nearness, of His immediacy, so to speak ; because we have gained, and are ever intensifying, a sense of the nearness of the world with which He environs us. Hence, when we speak of Him, we naturally cast about either for poetical phrases and figures, which must always be more or less vague and undefined, or for highly abstract expressions, which may suggest scientific exactness, but are, in truth, scholastic formulae, dry as the dust of the desert, untouched by the breath of life ; and even if they affirm a Person, destitute of all those living characters by which we instinctively and without effort recognise Personality. We make only a conventional use of the \ I ■ 304 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. language of the sacred writers, of the prophets and prophetic historians, of the psalmists, and the legalists of the Old Testament ; the language which is the native expression of a peculiar intensity of religious faith, realizing the Unseen as the Ac*^'ial and, in truth, the only Real. " Judah mourneth and the gates thereof languish, They are clad in black down to the ground ; ■ And the cry of Jerusalem hath gone up. And their nobles have sent their lesser folk for water ; They have been to the pits, and found no water : Their vessels have come back empty ; Ashamed and confounded, they have covered their heads. " Because the ground is chapt, for there hath not been rain in the land. The plowmen are ashamed, they have covered their heads. " For even the hind in the field hath yeaned and forsaken her fawn. For there is no grass. And the wild asses stand on the bare fells ; They snuff the wind like jackals ; Their eyes fail, for there is no pasturage. *' If our sins have answered against us, lahweh, act for Thine own Name sake ; For our relapses are many ; Against Thee have we trespassed. " Hope of Israel, that savest him in time of trouble, Wherefore wilt Thou be as a stranger in the land. And as a traveller that leaveth the road but for the night ? Wherefore wilt Thou be as a man o'erpowered with sleep. As a warrior that cannot rescue ? " Sith Thou art in our midst, O lahvah, And Thy Name upon us hath been called ; Cast us not down ! " . How beautiful both plaint and prayer ! The simple description of the effects of the drought is as lifelike xiv.,xv.] THE DROUGHT. 305 and impressive as a good picture. The whole country is stricken ; the city-gates, the place of common resort, where the citizens meet for business and for conversa- tion, are gloomy with knots of mourners robed in black from head to foot, or, as the Hebrew may also imply, sitting on the ground, in the garb and posture of deso- lation (Lam. ii. 10, iii. 28). The magnates of Jeru- salem send out their retainers to find water ; and we see them returning with empty vessels, their heads muffled in their cloaks, in sign of grief at the failure of their errand (cf i Kings xviii. 5, 6). The parched ground everywhere gapes with fissures ; ^ the yeomen go about with covered heads in deepest dejection. The distress is universal, and affects not man only, but the brute creation. Even the gentle hind, that proverb of maternal tenderness, is driven by sorest need to for- sake the fruit of her hard travail ; her starved dugs are dry, and she flies from her helpless offspring. The wild asses of the desert, fleet, beautiful and keen-eyed creatures, scan the withered landscape from the naked cliffs, and snuff the wind, like jackals scenting prey ; but neither sight nor smell suggests relief There is no moisture in the air, no glimpse of pasture in the wide sultry land. The prayer is a humble confession of sin, an un- reserved admission that the woes of man evince the righteousness of God. Unlike certain modern poets, who bewail the sorrows of the world as the mere in- fliction of a harsh and arbitrary and inevitable Destiny, Jeremiah makes no doubt that human sufferings are due ' The Heb. verb HDri "is broken " may probably have this meaning. " Dismayed " is not nearly so suitable, though it is the usual meaning of the term. Cf. Isa. vii. 8. 20 \ 3o6 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. to the working of Divine justice. " Our sins have answered against our pleas at Thy judgment seat ; our relapses are many ; against Thee have we tres- passed," against Thee, the sovereign Disposer of events, the Source of all that happens and all that is. If this be so, what plea is Left ? None, but that appeal to the Name of lahvah, with which the prayer begins and ends. "Act for Thine ovrn Name sake." . . . "Thy Name upon us hath been called." Act for Thine own honour, that is, for the honour of Mercy, Compassion, Truth, Goodness ; which Thou hast revealed Thyself to be, and which are parts of Thy glorious Name (Ex. xxxiv. 6). Pity the wretched, and pardon the guilty ; for so will Thy glory increase amongst men ; so will man learn that the relentings of love are diviner affections than the ruthlessness of wrath and the cravings of vengeance. There is also a touching appeal to the past. The very name by which Israel was sometimes designated as " the people of lahvah," just as Moab was known by the name of its god as " the people of Chemosh " (Num. xxi. 29), is alleged as proof that the nation has an interest in the compassion of Him whose name it bears ; and it is implied that, since the world knows Israel as lahvah's people, it will not be for lahvah's honour that this people should be suffered to perish in their sins. Israel had thus, from the outset of its history, been associated and identified with lahvah ; however ill the true nature of the tie has been under- stood, however unworthily the relation has been conceived by the popular mind, however little the obligations involved in the call of their fathers have been recognised and appreciated. God must be true, though man be false. There is no weakness, no caprice, no xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. 307 vacillation in God. In bygone " times of trouble " the " Hope of Israel " had saved Israel over and over again; it was a truth admitted by all — even by the prophet's enemies. Surely then He will save His people once again, and vindicate His Name of Saviour. Surely He who has dwelt in their midst so many changeful centuries, will not now behold their trouble with the lukewarm feeling of an alien dwelling amongst them for a time, but unconnected with them by ties of blood and kin and common country ; or with the indifference of the traveller who is but coldly affected by the calamities of a place where he has only lodged one night. Surely the entire past shews that it would be utterly inconsistent for lahvah to appear now as a man so buried in sleep that He cannot be roused to save His friends from imminent destruction (cf. I Kings xviii. 27) (St. Mark iv. 38). He who had borne Israel and carried him as a tender nurseling all the days of old (Isa. Ixiii. 9) could hardly without changing His own unchangeable Name, His character and purposes, cast down His people and forsake them at last. Such is the drift of the prophet's first prayer. To this apparently unanswerable argument his religious meditation upon the present distress has brought him. But presently the thought returns with added force, with a sense of utmost certitude, with a conviction that it is lahvah's Word, that the people have wrought out their own affliction, that misery is the hire of sin. Thus hath lahvah said of this people : Even so have they loved to wander, Their feet they have "hot refrained ; And as for lahvah, He accepteth them not ; 308 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. "He now remembereth their guilt, And visiteth their trespasses. And lahvah said unto me, Intercede thou not for this people for good ! If they fast, I will not hearken unto their cry ; And if they offer whole-offering and oblation, I will not accept their persons ; But by the sword, the famine, and the plague, will I consume them. " And I said, Ah, Lord lahvah ! Behold the prophets say to them. Ye shall not see sword. And famine shall not befall you ; For peace and permanence will I give you in this place. " And lahvah said unto me : Falsehood it is that the prophets prophesy in My Name. I sent them not, and I charged them not, and I spake not unto them. A vision of falsehood and jugglery and nothingness, and the guile of their own heart. They, for their part, prophesy you. '* Therefore thus said lahvah : Concerning the prophets who prophesy in My Name, albeit I sent them not. And of themselves say. Sword and famine there shall not be in this land ; By the sword and by the famine shall those prophets be fordone. And the people to whom they prophesy shall lie thrown cut in the streets of Jerusalem, Because of the famine and the sword, With none to bury them, — Themselves, their wives, and their sons and their daughters : And I will pour upon them their own evil. And thou shalt say unto them this word • Let mine eyes run down with tears, nig'.v and day, And let them not tire ; For with mighty breach is broken The virgin daughter of my people — With a very grievous blow. xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. 309 If I go forth into the field, Then behold ! the slain of the sword ; And if I enter the city, Then behold ! the pinings of famine : For both prophet and priest go trafficking about the land, And understand not." ' It has been supposed that this whole section is mis- placed, and that it would properly follow the close of chap. xiii. The supposition is due to a misapprehension of the force of the pregnant particle which introduces the reply of lahvah to the prophet's intercession. " Even so have they loved to wander ; " even so, as is naturally implied by the severity of the punishment of which thou complainest. The dearth is prolonged ; the distress is widespread and grievous. So prolonged, so grievous, so universal, has been their rebellion agi inst Me. The penalty corresponds to the offence. It is really " their own evil " that is being poured out upon their guilty heads (ver. 16; cf. iv. 18). lahvah can- not accept them in their sin ; the long drought is a token that their guilt is before His mind, unrepented, unatoned. Neither the supplications of another, nor their own fasts and sacrifices, avail to avert the visita- tion. So long as the disposition of the heart remains unaltered ; so long as man hates, not his darling sins, but the penalties they entail, it is idle to seek to pro- pitiate Heaven by such means as these. And xiot only so. The droughts are but a foretaste of worse evils to come ; by the sword, the famine, and the plague will I cousume them. The conditic«i is understood, If they repent and amend not. This is implied by the prophet's seeking to palliate the national guilt, as he proceeds to do, by the suggestion that the people are ' Cf. viii. 9. "And no wisdom is in them." 1)1 lli 310 THE PROPHECIES 0I< JEREMIAH. more sinned against than sinning, deluded as they arc by false prophets ; as also by the renewal of his inter- cession (ver. 19). Mad he been aware in his inmost heart that an irreversible sentence had gone forth against his people, would lie have been likely to think either excuses or intercessions availing ? Indeed, however absolute the threats of the prophetic preachers may sound, they must, as a rule, be qualified by this limitation, which, whether expressed or not, is insepar- able from the object of their discourses, which was the moral amendment of those who heard them. Of the " false," that is, the common run of prophets, who were in league with the venal priesthood of the time, and no less worldly and self-seeking than their allies, we note that, as usual, they foretell what the people wishes to hear ; " Peace (Prosperity), and Per- manence," is the burden of their oracles. They knew that invectives against prevailing vices, and denuncia- tions of national follies, and forecasts of approaching ruin, were un!"kely means of winning popularity and a substantial harvest of offerings. At the same time, like other false teachers, they knew how to veil their errors under the mask of truth ; or rather, they were themselves deluded by their own greed, and blinded by their covetousness to the plain teaching of events. They might base their doctrine of " Peace and Perman- ence in this place ! " upon those utterances of the great Isaiah, which had been so signally verified in the life- time of the seer himself; but their keen pursuit of selfish ends, their moral degradation, caused them to shut their eyes to everything else in his teachings, and, like his contemporaries, they " regarded not the work of lahvah, nor the operation of His hand." Jeremiah accuses them of " lying visions ; " visions, as he explains. xiv.,*xv.] THE DROUGHT. 3«» rs is r- he which were the outcome of magical ceremonies, Ijy aid of which, periiaps, they partially deluded themselves, before deluding others, but which were, none the less, " things of nought," devoid of all substance, and mere fictions of a deceitful and self-deceiving mind (ver. 14). He expressly declares that they have no mission ; in other words, their action is not due to the overpowering sense of a higher call, but is inspired by purely ulterior considerations of worldly gain and policy. They pro- phesy to order; to the order of man, not of God. If they visit the country districts, it is with no spiritual end in view ; priest and prophet alike make a trade ot their sacred profession, and, immersed in their sordid pursuits, have no eye for truth, and no perception of the dangers hovering over their country. Their mis- conduct and misdirection of affairs are certain to bring destruction upon themselves and upon those whom they mislead. War and its attendant famine will devour them all. But the daj^ of grace being past, nothing is left for the prophet himself but to bewail the ruin of his people (ver. 17). He will betake himself to weeping, since praying and preaching are vain. The words which announce this resolve may portray a sorrowful experience, or they may depict the future as though it were already present (vv. 17, 18). The latter in- terpretation would suit ver. 17, but hardly the follow- ing verse, with its references to "going forth into the field," and "entering into the city." The way in which these specific actions are mentioned seems to imply some present or recent calamity ; and there is apparently no reason why we may not suppose that the passage was written at the disastrous close of the reign of Josiah, in the troublous interval of three 3" THE rROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. months, when Jehoahaz was nominal king in Jerusalem, but the Egyptian arms were probably ravaging the country, and striking terror into the hearts of the people. In such a time of confusion and bloodshed, tillage would be neglected, and famine would naturally follow ; and these evils would be greatly aggravated by drought. The only other period which suits is the beginning of the reign of Jehoiakim;' but the former seems rather to be indicated by chap. xv. 6-9. Heartbroken at the sight of the miseries of his country, the prophet once more approaches the eternal throne. His despairing mood is not so deep and dark as to drown his faith in God. He refuses to believe the utter rejection of Judah, the revocation of the covenant. (The measure is Pentameter). " Hast Tliou indeed cast off Judah ? Hath Thy soul revolted from Sion ? Wliy hast Thou smitten us, past healing? Waiting for peace, and no good came, For a time of healing, and behold terror ! " We know, lahvah, our wickedness, our fathers' guilt ; For we have trespassed toward Thee. Scorn Thou not, for Thy Name sake, Disgrace not Thy glorious throne ! Remember, break not, Thy covenant with us ! " Are there, in sooth, among the Nothings of the nations senders of rain ? And is it the heavens that bestow the showers ? Is it not Thou, lahvah our God ? And we wait for Thee, For Thou it was that madest the world." ^ ' So Dathe, Nacgelsbach. - Lit. " all these things," i.e., this visible world. There is no Heb. special term for the " universe " or " world." " The all " or " heaven and earth," or the phrase in the text, are used in this sense. Xlv., XV.] THE DROUGHT, 313 To all this thf Divine answer is stern and decisive. And Inlivah said nnlo inc : If Moses and Samuel were to stand (pleading) before Me, My mind would not be towards this people : send them away from before Me (dismiss them from My Presence), that they may go forth ! After ages remembered Jeremiah as a mighty intercessor, " and the brave Maccabeus could see him in his dream as a grey-haired man " exceeding glorious " and " of a wonderful and excellent majesty," who "prayed much for the people and for the holy city" (2 Mace. xv. 14). And the beauty of t'.ie prayv^rs which lie like scattered pearls of faith and love among the prophet's soliloquies is evident at a glr.ncc. But here Jeremiah himself is conscious that his prayers are unavailing ; and that the office to which God has called him is rather that of pronouncing judgment than of interceding for mercy. Even a Moses or a Samuel, the mighty intercessors of the old heroic times, whose pleadings had been irresistible with God, would now plead in vain (Ex. xvii. 11 sqq.^ xxxii. Ii sqq.) Num. xiv. 13 sqq. for Moses; i Sam. vii. 9 sqq.^ xii. 16 sqq.) Ps. xcix. 6; Ecclus. xlvi. 16 sqq. for Samuel). The day of grace has gone, and the day of doom is come. His sad function is to " send them away " or "let them go" from lahvah's Presence; to pronounce the decree of their banishment from the holy land where His temple is, and where they have been wont to "see His face," The main part of his commission was " to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to overthrow" (i. 10). And if they say unto thee, Whither are we to go forth ? Thou shalt say unto them, thus hath lahvah said : They that belong to the Death (i.e. the Plague ; as the Black Death was spoken of in medieval Europe) to death; and they that belong to I m THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. the Sword, to the sword; and they that belong to the Famine, to famine ; and they that belong to Captivity, to captivity! The people were to "go forth" out of their own land, which was, as it were, the Presence- chamber of lahvah, just as they had at the outset of their history gone forth out of Egypt, to take possession of it. The words convey a sentence of exile, though they do not indicate the place of banishment. The menace of woe is as general in its terms as that lurid passage of the Book of the Law upon which it appears to be founded (Deut. xxviii. 21-26). The time for the accomplishment of those terrible threatenings " is nigh, even at the doors." On the other hand, Ezekiel's "four sore judgments " (Ezek. xiv. 21) were suggested by this passage of Jeremiah. The prophet avoids naming the actual destination of the captive people, because captivity is only one element in their punishment. The horrors of war — sieges and slaughters and pestilence and famine — must come first. In what follows, the intensity of these horrors is realized in a single touch. The slain are left unburied, a prey to the birds and beasts. The elaborate care of the ancients in the provision of honourable restingplaces for the dead is a measure of the extremity thus indicated. In accordance with the feeling of his age, the prophet ranks the dogs and vultures and hyenas that drag and disfigure and devour the corpses of the slain, as three " kinds " of evil equally appaUing with the sword that slays. The same feeling led our Spenser to write : " To spoil the dead of vyeed Is sacrilege, and doth all sins exceed." And the destruction of Moab is decreed by the earlier prophet Amos, " because he burned the bones of the king of Edom into lime," thus violating a law uni- versally recognised as binding upon the conscience of nations (Amos ii. l), Cf. also Gen. xxiii. Thus death itself was not to be a sufficient expiation for the inveterate guilt of the nation. Judgment was to pursue them even after death. But the prophet's vision does not penetrate beyond this present scene. With the visible world, so far as he is aware, the punishment terminates. He gives no hint here, nor elsewhere, of any further penalties awaiting individual sinners in the unseen world. The scope of his prophecy indeed is almost purely national, and limited to the present life. It is one of the recognised conditions of Old Testament religious thought. And the ruin of the people is the retribution reserved for what Manasseh did in Jerusalem. To the prophet, as to the author of the book of Kings, who wrote doubtless under the influence, of his words, the guilt contracted by Judah under that wicked king was unpardonable. But it would convey a false impression if we left the matter here ; for the whole course of his after-preaching — his exhortations and promises, as well as his threats — prove that Jeremiah did not suppose that the nation could not be saved by genuine repentance and permanent amendment. What he intends rather to affirm is that the sins of the fathers will be visited upon children, who are partakers of . their sins. It is the doctrine of St. Matt, xxiii. 29 sqq. ; a doctrine which is not merely a theological opinion, but a matter of historical observation. And I will set over them four kinds — // is an oracle of lahvah — the sword to slay, and the i^ogs to hale, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts of the earth, to devour and to destroy. And I will make them a sport JI« THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. for all the realms of earth; on account of Manasseh ben Hezekiah king of Judah, for what he did in Jerusalem. Jerusalem ! — the mention of that magical name touches another chord in the prophet's soul ; and the fierce tones of his oracle of doom change into a dirge-like strain of pity without hope. " For who will have compassion on Thee, O Jerusalem ? And who will yield thee comfort ? And who will turn aside to ask of thy welfare ? 'Twas thou that rejectedst Me (it is lahvah's word) ; Backward wouldst thou wend : So I stretched forth My hand against thee and destroyed thee ; I wearied of relenting. And I winnowed them with a fan in the gates of the land ; I bereaved, I undid My people : Yet they returned not from their own ways. His widows outnumbered before Me the sand of seas : I brought them against the Mother of Warriors a harrier at high noon ; I threw upon her suddenly anguish and horrors. She that had borne seven sons did pine away ; She breathed out her soul. Her sun did set, while it yet was day ; He blushed and paled. But iheir remnant will I give to the sword Before their foes : (It is lahvah's word)." The fate of Jerusalem would strike the nations dumb with horror ; it would not iiispire pity, for man would recognise that it was absolutely just. Or perhaps the thought rather is, In proving false to Me, thou wert false to thine only friend : Me thou hast estranged by thy faithlessness ; and from the envious rivals, who beset thee on every side, thou canst expect nothing but rejoicing at thy downfall (Ps. cxxxvi. ; Lam. ii. iS-i7i xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. 317 I Obad. 10 sqq). The peculiar solitariness of Israel among the nations (Num. :ixiii. 9) aggravated the anguish of her overthrow. In what follows, the dreadful past appears as a prophecy of the yet more terrible future. The poet- seer's pathetic monody moralizes the lost battle of Megiddo — that fatal day when the sun of Judah set in what seemed the high day of her prosperity, and all the glory and the promise of good king Josiah vanished like a dream in sudden darkness. Men might think — doubtless Jeremiah thought, in the first moments of despair, when the news of that overwhelming disaster was brought to Jerusalem, with the corpse of the good king, the dead hope of the nation — that this crushing blow was proof that lahvah had rejected His people, in the exercise of a sovereign caprice, and without reference to their own attitude towards Him. But, says or chants the prophet, in sohmn rhythmic utterance, " 'Twas thou that rejectedst Me ; Backward wouldst thou wend : So I stretched forth My hand against thee, and wrought thee hurt ; I wearied of relenting." The cup of national iniquity was full, ,'ind its baleful contents overflowed in a devastating flood. " In the gates of the land " — the 7>oint on the north-west frontier where the armies met — lahvah "winnowed His people with a fan," separating those who were doomed to fall from those who were to survive, as the winnowing fan separates the chaff" from the wheat in the threshing- floor. There He " bereaved" the nation of their dearest hope, " the breath of their nostrils, the Lord's Anointed " (Lam. iv. 20) ; there He multiplied their widows. And after the lost battle He brought the victor in hot haste ; .1 r I 'iX •': 3i8 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. against the " Mother " of the fallen warriors, the ill- fated city, Jerusalem, to wreak vengeance upon her for her ill-timed opposition. But, for all this bitter fruit of their evil doings, the people "turned not back from their own ways " ; and therefore the strophe of lamentation closes with a threat of utter extermination : " Their rem- nant" — the poor survival of these fierce storms — "Their remnant will I give to the sword before their foes." ^ If the thirteenth and fourteenth verses be not a mere interpolation in this chapter (see xvii. 3, 4), their proper place would seem to be here, as continuing and amplifying the sentence upon the residue of the people. The text is unquestionably corrupt, and must be amended by help of the other passage, where it is partially repeated. The twelfth verse may be read thus : "Thy wealth and thy treasures will I make a prey, For the sin of thine high places in all thy borders."' Then the fourteenth verse follows, naturally enough, with an announcement of the Exile : •' And I will enthral thee to thy foes In a land thou knowest not : ' For a fire is kindled in Mine anger,' That shall burn for evermore ! " ' * The reference to an eclipse of the sun in the words " Her sun went down, while it yet was day ; He blushed and paled." appears fairly certain. Such an event is said to have occurred in that part of the world, Sept. 30, b.c. 610. 2 13. Read -J^non "Thine high places" for T^nDa vb "without price " ; and transpose flNDnS (xvii. 3). ' 14. Read l^mSUni "and I will make thee serve" (xvii. 4) for *n"13rni "and I will make to pass through. . ." The third member is a quotation from Deu«^ xxxii. 22. In the fourth, read D?W"?I^ "for ever" (xvii. 4) instead of D3''?i; "upon you." xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. 319 The prophet has now fulfilled his function of judge by pronouncing upon his people the extreme penalty of the law. His strong perception of the national guilt and of the righteousness of God has left him no choice in the matter. But how little this duty of condemnation accorded with his own individual feeling as a man and a citizen is clear from the passionate outbreak of the succeeding strophe. "Woe's me, my mother," he exclaims, "that thou barest me, A man of strife and a man of contention to all the country ! Neither lender nor borrower have I been ; Yet all of them do curse me." A desperately bitter tone, evincing the anguish of a man wounded to the heart by the sense of fruit- less endeavour and unjust hatred. He had done his utmost to save his country, and his reward was universal detestation. His innocence and integrity were requited with the odium of the pitiless creditor who enslaves his helpless victim, and appropriates his all; or the fraudulent borrower who repays a too ready confidence with ruin.* The next two verses answer this burst of grief and despair : " Said lahvah. Thine oppression shall be for good ; I will make the foe thy suppliant in time of evil and in time of distress. Can one break iron, Iron from the north, and brass ? " In other words, faith counsels patience, and assures the prophet that all things work together for good ' The tone of all this indicates that the prophet was no novice in his office. It does not suit the time of Josiah ; but agrees very well with the time of confusion and popular dismay which followed i 11 320 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. to them that love God. The wrongs and bitter treat- ment which he now endures will only enchance his triumph, when the truth of his testimony is at last confirmed by events, and they who now scoff at his message, come humbly to beseech his prayers. The closing lines refer, with grave irony, to that unflinch- ing firmness, that inflexible resolution, which, as a messenger of God, he was called upon to mv''intain. He is reminded of what he had undertaken at the outset of his career, and of the Divine Word which made him " a pillar of iron and walls of brass against all the land" (i. i8). Is it possible that the pillar of iron can be broken, and the walls of brass beaten down by the present assault? There is a pause, and then the prophet vehemently pleads his own cause with lahvah. Smarting with the sense of personal wrong, he urges that his suffer- ing is for the Lord's own sake; that consciousness of the Divine calling has dominated his entire life, ever since his dedication to the prophetic office; and that the honour of lahvah requires his vindication upon his heartless and hardened adversaries. " Thou knowest, lahvah ! Remember me, and visit me, and avenge me on my per- secutors. Take me not away in thy longsuffering ; Regard my bearing of reproach for Thee. " Thy words were found, and I did eat them. And it became to me a joy and mine heart's gladness ; For I was called by Thy Name, O lahvah, God of Sabaoth ! his death. That event must have brought great discredit upon Jeremiah and upon all who had been instrumental in the religious chanf s of his reign. xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. ?2I " 1 sate not in the gathering of the mirthful, nor rejoiced ; Because of Thine hand I sate soUtary, For with indignation Thou didst fill me. "Why hath my pain become perpetual, And my stroke malignant, incurable ? Wilt Thou indeed become to me like a delusive stream, Like waters which are not lasting ? " The pregnant expression, " Thou knowest, lahvah ! " does not refer specially to anything that has been already said ; but rather lays the whole case before God in a single word. The Thou is emphatic ; Thou, Who knowest all things, knowest my heinous wrongs : Thou knowest and seest it all, though the whole world beside be bhnd with passion and self-regard and sin (Ps. X. 1 1- 14). Thou knowest how pressing is my need ; therefore Take me not away in Thy lottgsuffer- tng : sacrifice not the life of Thy servant to the claims of forbearance with his enemies and Thine. The petition shews how great was the peril in which the prophet perceived himself to stand : he believes that if God delay to strike down his adversaries, that longsuffering will be fatal to his own life. The strength of his case is that he is persecuted, because he is faithful ; he bears reproach for God. He has not abused his high calling for the sake of worldly advantage; he has not prostituted the name of prophet to the vile ends of pleasing the people, and satisfying personal covetousness. He has not feigned smooth prophecies, misleading his hearers with flattering falsehood ; but he has considered the privilege of being called a prophet of lahvah as in itself an all-sufficient reward ; and when the Divine Word came to him, he has eagerly received, and fed his inmost soul upon that spiritual aliment, wiiicli was 2,1 I- 5 f 3" THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. at once his sustenance and his deepest joy. Other joys, for the Lord's sake, he has abjured. He has withdrawn himself even from harmless mirth, that in silence and solitude he might listen intently to the inward Voice, and reflect with indignant sorrow upon the revelation of his people's corruption. Because of Thine Hand — under Thy influence ; conscious of the impulse and operation of Thy informing Spirit ; — I sate solitary; for with indignation Thou didst fill me. The man whose eye has caught a glimpse of eternal Truth, is apt to be dissatisfied with the shows of things ; and the lighthearted merriment of the world rings hollow upon the ear that listens for the Voice of God. And the revelation of sin — the discovery of all that ghastly evil which lurks beneath the surface of smooth society — the appalling vision of the grim skeleton hiding its noisome decay behind the mask of smiles and gaiety; the perception of the hideous incongruity of revelling over a grave ; has driven others, besides Jeremiah, to retire into themselves, and to avoid a world from whose evil they revolted, and whose foreseen destruction they deplored. The whole passage is an assertion of the prophet's integrity and consistency, with which, it is suggested, that the failure which has attended his efforts, and the serious peril in which he stands, are morally inconsistent, and paradoxical in view of the Divine disposal of events. Here, in fact, as elsewhere, Jeremiah has freely opened his heart, and allowed us to see the whole process of his spiritual conflict in the agony of his moments of doubt and despair. It is an argument of his own perfect sincerity ; and, at the same time, it enables us to assimilate the lesson of his experience, and to profit by the heavenly guidance he received, far more effec- xlv.jxv.] THE DROUGHT, 323 ! tually, than if he had left us ignorant of the painful struggles at the cost of which that guidance was won. The seeming injustice or indifference of Providence is a problem which recurs to thoughtful minds in all generations of men. " O, goddes cruel, that gov6rne This world with byndyng of youre word eterne ... What governance is in youre prescience That gilteles tormenteth innocence ? . . . . Alas ! I see a serpent or a theif, That many a trewe man hath doon mescheif, Gon at his large, and wher him luste may turne ; But I moste be in prisoun." That such apparent anomalies are but a passing trial, from which persistent faith will emerge victorious in the present life, is the general answer of the Old Testa- ment to the doubts which they suggest. The only sufficient explanation was reserved, to be revealed by Him, who, in the fulness of time, " brought life and immortality to light." The thought which restored the failing confidence •and courage of Jeremiah was the reflexion that such complaints were unworthy of one called to be a spokes- man for the Highest; that the supposition of the possibility of the Fountain of Living Waters failing like a winter torrent, that runs dry in the summer heats, was an act of unfaithfulness that merited reproof; and that the true God could not fail to protect His messenger, and to secure the triumph of truth in the end. " To this lahvah said thus : If thou come again, I will make thee again to stand before Me ; And if thou utter that is precious rather than that is vile, As My mouth shalt thou become : 314 THE PKOPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. They shall return unto thee, But Thou shalt not return unto them. "And I will make, thee to this people an embattled wall oi brass ; . ' And they shall fight against thee, but not overcome thee, For I will be with thee to help thee and to save thee ; It is lahvah's word. And I will save thee out of the grasp of the wicked, And will ransom thee out of the hand of the terrible." In the former strophe, the inspired poet set forth the claims of the psychic man, and poured out his heart before God. Now he recognises a Word of God in the protest of his better feeling. He sees that where he remains true to himself, he will also stand near to his God. Hence springs the hope, which he cannot renounce, that God will protect His accepted servant in the execution of the Divine commands. Thus the discords are resolved ; and the prophet's spirit attains to peace, after struggling through the storm. It was an outcome of earnest prayer, of an unreserved exposure of his inmost heart before God. What a marvel it is — that instinct of prayer ! To think that a being whose visible life has its beginning and its end, a being who manifestly shares possession of this earth with the brute creation, and breathes the same air, and partakes of the same elements with them for the sus- tenance of his body ; who is organized upon the same general plan as they, has the same principal members discharging the same essential functions in the economy of his bodily system ; a being who is born and eats and drinks and sleeps and dies like all other animals ; — that this being and this being only of all the multi- tudinous kinds of animated creatures, should have and exercise a faculty of looking off and above the visible xiv.,y.\.] THE DROUGHT, m v'hich appears to be the sole realm of actual existence, and of holding communion with the Unseen ! That, following what seems to be an original impulse of his nature, he should stand in greater awe of this Invisible than of any power that is palpable to sense ; should seek to win its favour, crave its help in times of pain and conflict and peril ; should professedly live, not according to the bent of common nature and the appe- tites inseparable from his bodily structure, but according to the will and guidance of that Unseen Power ! Surely there is here a consummate marvel. And the wonder of it does not diminish, when it is remembered that this instinct of turning to an unseen Guide and Arbiter of events, is not peculiar to any particular section of the human race. Wide and manifold as are the differences which characterize and divide the families of man, all races possess in common the apprehension of the Unseen and the instinct of prayer. The oldest records of humanity bear witness to its primitive activity, and whatever is known of human history combines with what is known of the character and workings of the human mind to teach us that as prayer has never been unknown, so it is never likely to become obsolete. May we not recognise in this great fact of human nature a sure index of a great corresponding truth ? Can we avoid taking it as a clear token of the reality of revelation ; as a kind of immediate and spontaneous evidence on the pirt of nature that there is and always has been in this lower world some positive knowledge of that which far transcends it, some real apprehension of the mystery that enfolds the universe? a know- ledge and an apprehension which, however imperfect and fragmentary, however fitful and fluctuating, how- ever blurred in outline and lost in infinite shadow, is 326 THE moriJEC/ES OF JEREMIAH. yet incomparably more and better than none at all. Are we not, in short, morally driven upon the convic- tion that this powerful instinct of our nature is neither blind nor aimless ; that its Object is a true, substantive Being ; and that this Being has discovered, and yet . discovers, some precious glimpses of Himself and His essential character to the spirit of mortal man ? It must be so, unless we admit that the soul's dearest desires are a mocking illusion, that her aspirations towards a truth and a goodness of superhuman per- fection are moonshine and madness. It cannot be nothingness that avails to evoke the deepest and purest emotions of our nature ; not mere vacuity and chaos, wearing the semblance of an azure heaven. It is not into a measureless waste of outer darkness that we reach forth trembling hands. Surely the spirit of denial is the spirit that fell from heaven, and the best and highest of man's thoughts aim at and affirm something positive, something that IS, and the soul thirsts after God, the Living God. We hear much in these days of our physical nature. The microscopic investigations of science leave nothing unexamined, nothing unexplored, so far as the visible organism is concerned. Rays from many distinct sources converge to throw an ever-increasing light upon the mysteries of our bodily constitution. In all this, science presents to the devout mind a valuable subsidiary revelation of the power and goodness of the Creator. But science cannot advance alone one step beyond the things of time and sense ; her facts belong exclusively to the material order of existence ; her cognition is limited to the various modes and conditions of force that constitute the realm of sight and touch ; she cannot climb above these to a higher plane of I xlv„ XV.] THE DROUGHT. 327 being. And small blame it is to science, that she thus lacks the power of overstepping her natural boundaries. The evil begins when the men of science venture, in her much-abused name, to ignore and deny realities not amenable to scientific tests, and immeasurably transcending all merely physical standards ark! methods. Neither the natural history nor the physiology of man, nor both together, are competent to give a com- plete account of his marvellous and many-sided being. Yet some thinkers appear to imagine that when a place has been assigned him in the animal kingdom, and his close relationship to forms below him in the scale of life has been demonstrated ; when every tissue and structure has been analysed, and every organ described and its function ascertained ; then the last word has been spoken, and the subject exhausted. Those unique and distinguishing faculties by which all this amazing work of observation, comparison, reasoning, has been accomplished, appear either to be left out of the account altogether, or to be handled with a meagre inadequacy of treatment that contrasts in the strongest manner with the fulness and the elaboration which mark the other discussion. And the more this physical aspect of our composite nature is emphasized ; the more urgently it is insisted that, somehow or other, all that is in man and all that comes of man may be explained on the assumption that he is the natural climax of the animal creation, a kind of educated and glorified brute — that and nothing more ; — the harder it becomes to give any rational account of those facts of his nature which are commonly recognised as spiritual, and among them of this instinct of prayer and its Object. Under these discouraging circumstances, men are fatally prone to seek escape from their self-involved 3a8 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. dilemma, by a hardy denial of what their methods have failed to discover and their favourite theories to explain. The soul and God are treated as mere meta- physical expressions, or as popular designations of the unknown causes of phenomena ; and prayer is declared to be an act of foolish superstition which persons of culture have long since outgrown. Sad and strpnge this result is ; but it is also the natural outcome of an initial error, which is none the less real because unper- ceived. Men "seek the living among the dead"; they expect to find the soul by post mortem examination, or to see God by help of an improved telescope. They fail and are disappointed, though they have little right to be so, for " spiritual things are discerned spiritually," and not otherwise. In speculating on the reasons of this lamentable issue, we must not forget that there is such a thing as an unpurified intellect as well as a corrupt aiid unregenerate heart. Sin is not restricted to the affections of the lower nature ; it has also invaded the realm of thought and reason. The very pursuit of knowledge, noble and elevating as it is commonly esteemed, is not with- out its dangers of self-delusion and sin. Wherever the love of self is paramount, wherever the object really sought is the delight, the satisfaction, *he indulgence of self, no matter in which of the many departments of human life and action, there is sin. It is certain that the intellectual consciousness has its own peculiar pleasures, and those of the keenest and most trans- porting character ; certain that the incessant pursuit of such pleasures may come to absorb the entire energies of a man, so that no room is left for the culture of humility or love or worship. Everything is sacrificed to what is called the pursuit of truth, ^"it is in sober xiv., :cv.] THE DROUGHT. 329 fact a passionate prosecution of private pleasure. It is not truth that is so highly valued ; it is the keen excite- ment of the race, and not seldom the plaudits of the spectators v/hen the goal is won. Such a career may be as thoroughly selfish and sinful and alienated from God as a career of common wickedness. And thus e.nployed or enthralled, no intellectual gifts, however splendid, can bring a man to the discernment of spiritual truth. Not self-pleasing and foolish vanity and arrogant self-assertion, but a self-renouncing humility, an inward purity from idols of every kind, a reverence of truth as divine, are indispensable con- ditions of the perception of things spiritual. The representation which is often given is a mere travestJ^ Believers in God do not want to alter His laws by their prayers — neither His laws physical, lior His laws moral and spiritual. It is their chief desire to be brought into submission or perfect obedience to the sum of His laws. They ask their Father in heaven to lead and teach them, to supply their wants in His own way, because He is their Father ; because " It is He that made us, and His we are." Surely, a reason- able request, and grounded in reason. To a plain man, seeking for arguments to justify prayer may v/ell seem like seeking a justification of breathing, or eating and drinking and sleeping, or any other natural function. Our Lord neve, does anything of the kind, because His teaching takes for granted the ultimate prevalence of common sense, in spite of all the subtleties and airspun perplexities, in which a specula- tive mind delights to lose itself. So long as man has other wants than those which he can himself supply, prayer will be their natural expression. If there be a spiritual as distinct from a material world, 330 THE PROPHECIES OF TEREMIAH. the difficulty to the ordinary mind is not to conceive of their contact but of their absolute isolation from each other. This is surely the inevitable result of our own individual experience, of the intimate though not indis- soluble union of body and spirit in every living person. How, it may be asked, can we really t?hink of his Maker being cut off from man, or man from his Maker ? God were not God, if He left man to himself. But not only are His wisdom, justice and love manifested forth in the beneficent arrangements of the world in which we find ourselves ; not only is He " kind to the unjust and the r thankful." In pain and loss He quickens our sense of Himself (cf. xiv. 19-22). Even in the first moments of angry surprise and revolt, that sense is quickened ; we rebel, not against an inanimate world or an impersonal law, but against a Living and Personal Being, whom we acknowledge as the Arbiter of our destinies, and whose wisdom and love and power we affect for the time to question, but cannot really gainsay. The whole of our experience tends to this end — to the continual rousing of our spiritual con- sciousness. There is no interference, no isolated and capricious interposition or interruption of order within or without us. Within and without us. His Will ip always energizing, always manifesting forth His Being, encouraging our confidence, demanding our obedience and homage. Thus prayer has its Divine as well as its human side ; it is the Holy Spirit drawing the soul, as well as the soul drawing nigh unto God. The case is like the action and reaction of the magnet and the steel. And so prayer is not a foolish act of unauthorised pre- sumption, not a rash effort to approach unapproachable and absolutely isolated Majesty. Whenever man truly xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. 33 » prays, his Divino Xing has already extended the sceptre of :-Iis mercy, and bidden him speak. xvi.-xvii. After the renewal of the promise there is a natural pause, marked by the formula with which the present section opens. When the prophet had recovered his firmness, through the inspired and inspiring reflexions which took possession of his soul after he had laid bare his inmost heart before God (xv. 20, 21), he was in a position to receive further guidance from above. What now lies before us is the direction, which came to him as certainly Divine, for the regulation of his own future behaviour as the chosen minister of lahvah at this crisis in the history of his people. " And there fell a word of lahvah unto me, saying : Thou shalt not take thee a wife ; that thou get not sons and daughters in this place." Such a pro- hibition reveals, with the utmost possible clearness and emphasis, the gravity of the existing situation. It implies that the " peace and permanence," so glibly predicted by Jereminh's opponents, will never more be known by that sinful generation. " This place," the holy place which lahvah had " chosen, to establish His name there," as the Book of the Law so often describes it ; " this place," which had been inviolable to the fierce hosts of the Assyrian in the time of Isaiah (Isa. xxxvii. 33), was now no more a sure refuge, but doomed to utter and speedy destruction. To beget sons and daughters there was to prepare more victims for the tooth of famine, and the pangs of pestilence, and the devouring sword of a merciless conqueror. It was to fatten the soil with unburied carcases, and to spread a hideous banquet for birds and beasts of prey. Children and parents were doomed to perish together ; and lahvah's witness was to keep himself unencumberea uy 332 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH I the sweet cares of husband and father, that he might be wholly free for his solemn duties of menace and warn- ing, and be ready for every emergency. " For thus hath lahvah said : Concerning the sons and concerning the daughters that are born in this place, And concerning their mothers that bear them, And concerning their fathers that beget them, in this land : By deaths of agony shall they die ; They shall not be mourned nor buried ; For dung on the face of the ground shall they serve; And by the sword and by the famine shall they be fordone : And their carcase shall serve for food To the fowls of the air and to the beasts of the earth" (xvi. 3-4). The "-deaths of agony" seem to indicate the pes- tilence, which always ensued upon the scarcity and vile quality of food, and the confinement of multitudes within the narrow bounds of a besieged city (see Josephus* well-known account of the last siege of Jerusalem). The attitude of solitary watchfulness and strict separation, which the prophet thus perceived to be required by circumstances, was calculated to be a warning of the utmost significance, among a people who attached the highest importance to marriage, and the permanence of the family. It proclaimed more loudly than words could do, the prophet's absolute conviction that offspring was no pledge of permanence ; that universal death was hanging over a condemned nation. But not only this. It marks a point of progress in the prophet's spiritual life. The crisis, through which we have seen him pass, has purged his mental vision. He no longer repines at his dark lot ; no longer half envies the false prophets, who may xiv,, XV.] THE DROUGHT. 333 win the popular love by pleasing oracles of peace and well-being ; no longer complains of the Divine Will, which has laid such a burden upon him. He sees now that his part is to refuse even natural and innocent pleasures for the Lord's sake ; to foresee calamity and ruin ; to denounce unceasingly the sin he sees around him ; to sacrifice a tender and affectionate heart to a life of rigid asceticism ; and he manfully accepts his part. He knows that he stands alone — the last fortress of truth in a world of falsehood ; and that for truth it becomes a man to surrender his all. That which follows tends to complete the prophet's social isolation. He is to give no sign of sympathy in the common joys and sorrows of his kiud. " For thus hath lahvah said : - Enter thou not into the house of mourning, Nor go to lament, nor comfort thou them : For I have taken away My friendship from this people ('Tis lahvah 's utterance ! ) The lovingkindness and the compassion ; And old and young shall die in this land, They shall not be buried, and men shall not wail for them ; Nor shall a man cut himself, nor make himself bald, for them : Neither shall men deal out bread to them in mourning, To comfort a man over the dead ; Nor shall they give them to drink the cup of consolation, Over a man's father and over his mother. " And the house of feasting thou shalt not enter. To sit with them to eat and to drink. For thus hath lahvah Sabaoth, the God of Israel, said : Lo, I am about to make to cease from this place, Before your own eyes and in your own days, Voice of mirth and voice of gladness, The voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride." Acting as prophet, that is, as one whose public actions were symbolical of a Divine intent, Jeremiah is 334 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. henceforth to stand aloof, on occasions when natural feeling would suggest participation in the outward life of his friends and acquaintance. He is to quell the inward stirrings of affection and sympathy, and to abstain from playing his part in those demonstrative lamen- tations over the dead, which the immemorial custom and sentiment of his country regarded as obligatory ; and this, in order to signify unmistakably that what thus appeared to be the state of his own feelings, was really the aspect under which God would shortly appear to a nation perishing in its guilt. " Enter not into the house of mourning . . . for I have taken away My friendship from this people, the lovingkindness and the compassion." An estranged and alienated God would view the coming catastrophe with the cold indifference of exact justice. And the consequence of the Divine aversion would be a calamity so overwhelming, that the dead would be left without those rites of burial, which the feeling and conscience of all races of man- kind have always been careful to perform. There should be no burial, much less ceremonial lamentation, and those more serious modes of evincing grief by disfigurement of the person,* which, like tearing the h.^'.r and rending the garments, are natural tokens of the first distraction of bereavement. Not for wife or child (np: see Gen. xxiii. 3), nor for father or mother should the funeral feast be held ; for men's hearts would grow hard at the daily spectacle of death, and at last there would be no survivors. In like manner, the prophet is forbidden to enter as ' Practices forbidden, Lev. xxi. 5 ; Dcut. xiv. i. Jeremiah mentions them as ordinary signs of mourning, and doubtless they were general in his time. An ancient usage, having its root in natural feeling, is not easily extirpated. xlv.,xv.] THE DROUGHT. 335 guest " the house of feasting." He is not to be seen at the marriage-feast, — that occasion of highest rejoicing, the very type and example of innocent and holy mirth ; to testify by his abstention that the day of judgment was swiftly approaching, which would desolate all homes, and silence for evermore all sounds of joy and gladness in the ruined city. And it is expressly added that the blow will fall " before your own eyes and in your own days ; " sh ewing that the hour of doom was very near, and would nc more be delayed. In all this, it is noticeable that the Divine answer appears to bear special reference to the peculiar terms of the prophet's complaint. In despairing tones he had cried (xv. lo), " Woe's me, my mother, that thou didst bear me ! " and now he is himself warned not to take a wife, and seek the blessing of children. The outward connexion here may be : " Let it not be that thy children speak of thee, as thou hast spoken of thy mother ! " ^ But the inner link of thought may rather be this, that the prophet's temporary unfaithfulness evinced in his outcry against God and his lament that ever he was born is punished by the denial to him of the joys of fatherhood — a penalty which would be severe to a loving, yearning nature like his, but which was doubtless necessary to the purification of his spirit from all worldly taint, and to the discipline of his natural impatience and tendency to repine under the hand of God. His punishment, like that of Moses, may appear disproportionate to his offence ; but God's dealings with man are not regulated by any mechanical calculation of less and more, but by His perfect know- ledge of the needs of the case ; and it rs often in truest mercy that His hand strikes hard. " As gold in the .' Naegelsbach. m 336 T//E PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. furnace doth He try them " ; and the purest metal comes out of the hottest fire. Further, it is not the least prominent but the leading part of a man's nature that most requires this heavenly discipline, if the best is to be made of it that can be made. The strongest element, that which is most characteristic of the person, that which constitutes his individuality, is the chosen field of Divine influence and operation ; for here lies the greatest need. In Jeremiah this master element was an almost feminine tenderness ; a warmly affectionate disposition, craving the love and sympathy of his fellows, and recoiling r.lmost in agony from the spectacle of pain and suffer- ing. And therefore it was that the Divine disciplirje w^ specially applied to this element »ii the prophet's personality. In him, as in all other men, the good was mingled with evil, which, if not purged away, might spread until it spoiled his whole nature. It is not virtue to indulge our own bent, merely because it pleases us to do so ; nor is the exercise of affection any great matter to an affectionate nature. The involved strain of selfishness must be separated, if any naturally good gift is to be elevated to moral worth, to become acceptable in the sight of God. And so it was pre- cisely here, in his most susceptible point, that the sword of trial pierced the prophet through. He was saved from all hazard of becoming satisfied with the love of wife and children, and forgetting in that earthly satisfaction the love of his God. He was si: /ed from absorption in the pleasures of friendly intercourse with neighbours, from passing his days in an agreeable round of social amenities ; at a time when ruin was impending over his country, and well nigh ready to fall. And the means which God chose for the accomplish- xiv., XV.] THE DROUGHT. 337 le LS ll'. ment of this result were precisely those of which the prophet had complained (xv. 17) ; his social isolation, which though in part a matter of choice, was partly forced upon him by the irritation and ill-will of his acquaintance. It is now declared that this trial is to continue. The Lord does not necessarily remove a trouble, when entreated to do it. He manifests His love by giving strength to bear it, until the work of chastening be perfected. An interruption is now supposed, such as may often have occurred in the course of Jeremiah's public utter- ances. The audience demands to know why all this evil is ordained to fall upon them. What is our gitilt and what our trespass, that we have trespassed against lahvah our God ? The answer is a twofold accusation. Their fathers were faithless to lahvah, and they have outdone their fathers' sin ; and the penalty will be expulsion and a foreign servitude. '* Because your fathers forsook Me (It is lahvah's word !) And went after other gods, and served them, and bowed down to them, And Me they forsook, and My teaching they observed not : And ye yourselves (or, as for you) have done worse than your fathers ; And lo, ye walk each after the stubbornness of his evil heart, So as not to hearken unto Me. Therefore will I hurl you from off this land, On to the land that ye and your fathers knew not ; And ye may serve there other gods, day and night, Since I will not grant you grace." The damning sin laid to Israel's charge is idolatry, with all the moral consequences involved in that prime transgression. That is to say, the offence consisted not barely in recognising and honouring the gods of the nations along with their own God, though that 338 THE PROPHECIES OF JEREMIAH. were fault enough, as an act. of treason against the sole majesty of Heaven ; but it was aggravated enor- mously by the moral declension and depravity, which accompanied this apostasy. They and their fathers forsook lahvah " and kept not His teaching ; " a reference to ,he Book of the Law, considered not only as a collec- tion of ritual and ceremonial precepts for the regulation of external religion, but as a guide of life and conduct. And there had been a progress in evil ; the nation had gone from bad to worse with fearful rapidity : so that now it could be said of the existing generation that it paid no heed at all to the monitions which lahvah uttered by. the mouth of His prophet, but walked simply in stubborn self-will and the indulgence of every corrupt inclination. And here too, as in so many other cases, the sin is to be its own punishment. The Book of the Law had declared that revolt from lahvah should be punished by enforced service of strange gods in a strange land (Deut. iv. 28, xxviii. 36, 64); and Jeremiah repeats this threat, with the addition ot a tone of ironical concession : there, in your bitter banish- ment, you may have your wish to the full ; you may serve the foreign gods, and that without intermission (implying that the service would be a slavery). The whole theory of Divine punishment is implicit in these few words of the prophet. They who sin persistently against light and knowledge are at last given over to their own hearts' lust, co do as they please, without the gracious check of God's inward voice. And then there comes a strong delusion, so that they believe a lie, and take evil for good and good for evil, and hold themselves innocent before God, when their guilt has reached its climax ; so that, like Jeremiah's hearers, if their evil be denounced, they can xiv., XV.] THE PKOUGirr. 339 ask in astonishment : " What is our iniquity ? or what is our trespass ? " They are so ripe in sin that they retain no knowledge of it as sin, but hold it virtue. " And they, so perfect is their misery, Not once perceive their foul disfigurement, But boast themselves more comely than before." And not only do we find in this passage a striking instance of judicial blindness as the penalty of sin. We may see also in the penalty predicted for the Jews a plain analogy to the doctrine that the permanence of the sinful st.ite in a life to come is the penalty of sin in the present life. " He that is unjust, let him be unjust still ; and he that is filthy, let him be filthy still ! " and know himself to be what he is. The prophet's dark horizon is here apparently lit up for a moment by a gleam of hope. The fourteenth and fifteenth verses, however, with their beautiful promise of restoration, really belong to another oracle, whose prevailing tones are quite different from the present gloomy forecast of retribution (xxiii. 7 sqq.). Here they interrupt the sense, and make a cleavage in the connexion of thought, which can only be bridged over artificially, by the suggestion that the import of the two verses is primarily not consolatory but minatory ; that is to say, that they threaten Exile rather than promise Return ; a mode of understanding the two verses which does manifest violence to the whole form of expression, and, above all, to their obvious force in the original passage from which they have been transferred hither. Probably some transcriber of the text wrote them in the margin of his copy, by way of palliating the other- wise unbroken gloom of this oracle of coming woe. Then, at some later time, another copyist, supposing .^40 TITF. PNOrilECIES OF JEKEMIAH. the marginal note indicated an omission, incorporated the two verses in his transcription of the text, where they have remained ever since. (See on xxiii. 7, 8.) After plainly announcing in the language of Deuter- onomy the expulsion of Judah from the land which they had desecrated by idolatry, the prophet develops the idea in his own poetic fashion ; representing the punishment as universal, and insisting that it is a punishment, and not an unmerited misfortune. " Lo, I am about to send many fishers (It is lahvah's word 1) And tlioy shall fish them ; And afterwards will I send many hunters, And tiiey shall hunt them, From off every mountain, .. And from off every hill. And out of the clefts of the rocks." Like silly fish, crowding helplessly one over another into the net,* when the fated moment arrives, Judah will fall an easy prey to the destroyer. And " after- wards," to ensure completeness, those who have sur- vived this first disaster will be hunted like wild beasts, out of all the dens and caves in the mountains, the Adullams and Engedis, where they have found a refuge from the invader. There is clearly reference to two distinct visitations of wrath, the latter more deadly than the former ; else why the use of the emphatic note of time "after- wards " ? If we understand by the " fishing " of the country the so-called first captivity, the carrying away of the boy-king Jehoiachin and his mother and his nobles and ten thousand principal citizens, by Nebu- ' The figure recalls the Persian custom of sweeping off the whole population of an island, by forming a line and marching over it, a process of extermination called by the Greek writers aayi\vtvuv^ " fishing with a seirte or drag-net " (Herod, iii. 149, iv. 9, vi. 31). xiv., xv.J THE DROUGHT, 341 chadrezzar to Babylon (2 Kings xxiv. 10 vsv/