Ir_ .U'iI .... "" .. , .. 'd.xu"p

�lje �rutb·
�bout ctCatbolit�

New Edition, July 1, 1935



CONTENTS

Foreword -----______________________________________________________ 1

Church or Bible ---------------_________________________________ 2

Questiop.s and Answers, Masonry,
K. C. Oath ----------------- � --4-5

Why Be a Catholic 6

The Visible Church 7

The Rosary Explained ,.______ 10

Confession .. 11

Purgatory 12

Adoration of Mary 13

Catholic Countries Unprogressive __ 14

Why Priests Do Not Marry � , 14

Protestant Marriages ---------------------------------- 15

Departure of Non-Catholic Bodies from

Apostolic Teaching , 16

History of Sects 20

.. The Bible an Authority only in Catholic
Hands ' '______________________________________ 21

The Church and Science 28

Abstract of Title from St. Peter to Present

Pope 29

• Is the Catholic Church the Church of
the Ignorant? 32

Catholic Beliefs Back Cover

What Protestant Historians Say Back Cover

Modern Minds Shall Pass Away,
But- Back Cover



FOREWORD

Dear Non-Catholic Friends:

Before you mislay this Booklet ask yourself three

questions:

AM I RIGHT?

Four hundred years ago all English speaking peo­
ple were Catholic. Many of the greatest minds of

the age-scientists, philosophers, reformers, poets,

critics, etc., have become convinced that the Catho­

lic Church is the Living Representative of The

Greatest Mind of all time, Jesus Christ, The Son

of God. ARE THEY RIGHT OR AM I?

AM I JUST?

As an American I do not deny, even to murderers,
the hearing I refuse to the Catholic Church. I con­
demn her upon the evidence of her enemies only,
and in doing so I forget that men once so con­

demned Jesus Christ Himself. IS THIS JUST?

AM I PRUDENT?

JESUS founded a Church to teach all nations

(Matt. 28.19.); (Mark 16.15), and to endure "to the
end of the world". (Matt. 28.20.) To Her teachers
He said, "He that heareth you heareth Me". (Luke
10.16.). "He that believeth not shall be condemned",

(Mark 16.16.) .

. History tells me that she is the only world wide
Church that has preserved her identity, authority and

worship from Apostolic times, and that she is the

only Church founded by the Infallible Son of God.
She is, therefore, as different from other Churches

as Her Divine Founder is different from other Church

founders. AM I PRUDENT IN FAILING TO

INVESTIGATE HER CLAIMS?

Rev. Joseph B. Ward,
175 High St., Lewisham, London, S. E. 13

1



CHURCH OR BIBLH?

Which was appointed by Christ to teach mankind

the- true Religion l

When our Divine Saviour sent His Apostles thru­

out the universe to preach the Gospel to every crea­

ture, He laid down the conditions of salvation thus:

"He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved,
but he that believeth not shall be condemned." Here

then our Blessed Lord laid down two conditions­

Faith and Baptism. (Mark. 16 :16.)

What is this Divine Faith which we must have in

order to be saved? It is to believe, upon the author­

ity of God, the truths that God has revealed. Now

if a man is at liberty to believe any kind of religion
provided he be a good man, then what use for Christ
to send out His Apostles to teach all nations? Are

men and nations at liberty to reject the teaching of
the Apostles? Therefore if a man would be saved

he must profess the true Religion.

Now if God commands me under pain of damna­
tion to believe what He has taught He is bound to

give me the means to know what He has taught.
Has God given us such means? "Yes", say all

Protestants, "He has". And so say the Catholics.
What is the means God has given us whereby we

shall learn what He has taught?

"The Bible say our Protestant friends and nothing
but the Bible."

But we Catholics say "No"; not the Bible but the
Church of God". For if God had intended that man

should learn his religion from the Bible, surely God
would have given that book to man. Did He do so?
He did not. Christ sent His Apostles thruout the
universe and said: "Go ye therefore, and teach all

nations, baptising them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, teaching them
to observe a.Il things whatsoever l have commanded

you. Matt. 28 :19.

Christ did not say, sit down and write Bibles and

let every man read and judge for himself. T'hat in­

junction was reserved for the sixteenth century, and
we have seen the result of it in the founding of about
500, religions by men, all quarreling with one an­

other about the interpretation of the Bible.

Jesus never wrote a line of scripture nor did He

command His Apostles to do so, except when He di­

rected St. John to write the Apocalypse 1 :11, but

ordered them to "teach all nations". Matt. 28 :19.

In Matt. 18 :17, He does not say "He that will not

read the scriptures, but "he that will not hear the

Church" is to be considered a heathen and publican.

The Apostles never circulated a single volume of

scripture, but going forth, preached everywhere, the

Lord cooperating with them. Mark 16 :20. Tis true

our Lord said on one occasion: "Search the scriptures,
for in them ye think ye Irave eterna] Hfe, and the



same are they that give testimony to me". This

passage is quoted in favor of private interpretation
but proves nothing of the kind. Our Saviour speaks
here only of the Old Testament because the New
Testament was not yet written. He addressed, not

the Apostles, but the Pharisees, and reproaches them
for not admitting His Divinity. All Religions out­
side the Catholic Church teach that the Bible is their

rule of faith, and that men cannot be saved without
the Bible.

The Church established by Christ existed about 65

years before St. John wrote the book of Revelation.

During these 65 years how did the people know what

they had to do to save their souls? Was it from
the Bible th e'y learned it? No, because the Bible
was not yet written. They knew it precisely as we
know it, from the teaching of the Church of God.

Before the art of printing and papermaking were
invented about the fifteenth century, everything had
to be done with a pen upon parchment or sheepskin,
and in those days a Bible would have cost about

$8000. Not one in 50,000 had a Bible.

Would Our Divine Lord have left the world for

1500 years without that book if it were necessary
to man's salvation? Most assuredly not. But sup­
pose that all had Bibles. What good will that book
be to one half of the people of the world who can­
not read?

Now with regard to the King James edition learned
Protestant Preachers and Bishops have written vol­
umes to point out the errors that are in it, and
various denominations acknowledge it. Some years
ago there was held in St. Louis a convention of min­

isters to which all demoninations were invited, the

object being to arrange for a new translation of the
Bible. In that convention a very learned Presby­
terian stood up and urging the necessity of a new
translation said, that in the present Protestant Bible
there were no less than thirty thousand errors.

Protestants say the man who reads the Bible

prayerfully has truth. Let us suppose: here is an

Episcopal minister; he reads the Bible in a prayerful
spirit and he says it is clear and evident there must
be bishops, for without bishops there can be no

priests, without priests there can be no Sacraments
and without Sacraments no Church. The Presbyte­
rian, a sincere and well meaning man, deduces from
the Bible that there should be no bishops, only Pres­

byters. A number of sects hold that baptism by im­
mersion is correct while others approve of baptism
by sprinkling.

Next comes the Unitarian who calls them a pack
of Idolators worshipping a man for a God and he

quotes several texts from the Bible to prove it.

I have here brought together a number of de­
nominations understanding the Bible in different

ways. What then, if l brought together 500 de-

a



Rev. Arnold Damien. S. J.

nominations all differing. One says there is no hell.
Another says there is a hell. One says Christ is God,
another says He is not, etc.

IS ANYONE FOOLISH ENOUGH TO DELIEVE

THAT THE CHANGELESS AND ETERNAL HOLY

GHOST IS DIRECTlNG THOSE .FIVE HUNDRED

SECTS TELLING ONE YES AND ANOTHER NO.

DECI.JARI�G A THING TO BE BLACK AND WHITE,
FALSE AND TRUE, AT THE SAlUE TIll'lE.

If the Bible were intended as the guide and teacher
of man, would St. Peter have declared that "In the

scriptures are things hard to be understood, which
the unlearned and unstable wrest to their own de­

struction". 2 Peter, 3 :16.

If sa Ivation tl�pends upon believing truths, can
we suppose that God would have each individual de­

termine what these truths are? In His Kingdom
there are no sects but harmony and unity, yet His
Kingdom on earth, established by His own Blood,
should be a house, "divided against itself". Five
bundred contradictory sects 'with about 1000 offshoots

during the past 4001 years because of understanding
the Bible in different ways.

When George Washington and his associates wrote
the constitution they did not say to the people, "Let
every man make his own explanation of the consti­
tution." What did Washington do? He appointed
his Supreme court to give the true explanation of
the Constitution to all citizens, from the President
to the beggar, and it is this alone that has pre­
served the Union of the United States.

So our Divine Saviour established His Supreme
Court, His Supreme Judge to give us the meaning of
the scriptures and the Son of the Living God has
pledged His Word that the Supreme Court is in­
fallible in Matters of Faith and morals. John 16 :13.

I have now proved to you that the private inter­
pretation of the scripture cannot be the guide or
teacher of man.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

1. Don't you Catholics adore relics and Saints l

We don't. If we did we would be idolators. Now

idolatry is worse than murder, for murder is di­
rectly against one's neighbor, idolatry is directly
against God.

2. Are you not narrow to believe that yours is

the only true Church of Christ?

We are not. Are you narrow for believing your
God to be the only true God? Truth is one and can't
be mixed with untruth. Since Christ set up but

4



4. Your Church is intolerant.

Yes: she hates untruth, vice, humbug, and what­

ever Christ, her Bridegroom,. hates. She therefore

condemns books that contain false doctrines, or are

calculated to injure the morals of peoples. Again,
if men make use of politics to suppress or violate

her rights or Christian Morality, then she exercises

her rights from above, to protect her children and

herself from evil.

one Church, we refuse to believe more than one

Ch urch to be true.

3. What about so many bad Catholicsf

What about the millions of saintly ones who attend

Mass daily before going to work? Our Lord told

us not to be scandalised when we see "cock] e and

wheat in His Church". But why blame the Church

for bad Catholics? All the bad Catholics of the world

are not the Catholic Church. Then, they are bad

because they forget their Catholic duties and dis­

grace their exalted condition, a matter of "fallen

angels", not to be seized with much eagerness: so

long as there is life there is hope for them. Is it

not more profitable to speak about the unnumbered

Ca tholic Martyrs and Saints?

5. Why can't Catholics be Masons?

One reason is that Masonry is a man-made religion
with a doctrine and a ritual of its own; hence Catho­

lics cannot belong to it any more than they can be­

long to, say, Islam.

6. You don't deny the oath of the Fourth De­

gree, K. of C.?

We do emphatically. Since 1922 an oath of this

kind has been invented and spread all over the coun­

try to poison America against Catho lics generally
and the Knights particularly. Our Courts have proved
that oath to be the "'invention of an impious and

venomous mind". Numbers of fa.ì r-m tnd ed 32nd and

33rd degree Masons, past Grandmasters, such as Mot­

ley Hewes Flint, Dana Reid Weller, William Rhodes

Hervey and Samuel E. Burke, of California, have in­

vestigated the alleged oath and declared it to be

"scurilous, wicked and libelous". (Congressional Rec­

ord, Vol. 52, P. 2817).

7. What is the use of Monks and Nun8?

Their lives are lives of prayer as those of Angels
in Heaven. Every Order has its own peculiar spirit
and work. You find our Monks and Nuns spending
themselves in the service of their neighbor, in schools,

hospitals, homes for the aged, refuges of the unfor­

tunate and neglected; the care of prisoners, orphans,

lepers; the safeguarding of virtue among the unpro­
tected. No lives are more benevolent to poor suffer­

ing humanity.



S. Can't you keep your religion to yourselve�,
leaving non-Cathloics alone?

We can't. 'Ours is the Gospel of the Holy One
who said, "Go ye and teach all nations ... Ye
are all brothers . . . Love each other as your­
selves !"; and not the Gospel of Cain who said, "Am
I my brother's keeper?" We are for truth, virtue,
peace, Legitimate Authority, (everybody his due, tax
to whom tax, honor to whom honor, in short, for all
the cures needed by Society).

RATHER THAN OBSTRUCT OUR MISSION, COME
AND BE A TORCHBEARER OF TRUTH, A HEALER
OF WOUNDED HEARTS, A ""VORI<ER FOR THE
KINGDOM OF GOD, A SOLDIER OF CHRIST; IN
ONE "WORD, A CATHOLIC. GREAT WILL OUR
REWARD BE HEREAFTER.

Rev. A. Copperstone,
lVIa Ha.

WHY BE A CATHOLIC?

By Fr. Bernard Vaughan, S. J.

I was asked-Why am I a Catholic? I said that
among other reasons was this-that I had the strong­
est objection to going to hell. Then came this further
question: Do you then believe that all non-Catholics
go to hell? I replied that I hoped the vast majority
of mankind would go to heaven-in fact, all outside
the Catholic Church seemed to be furnished with

through tickets. I do not say that those outside the
Catholic Church rw

ì

l l be lost, because so many,
through no fault of their own, cannot accept the
Catholic faith or believe in hell; but as all Catholics
believe that the Catholic Church is the one and only
true church of Jesus Christ, and as they believe in
hell, I say that if we were not loyal we should go to
hell. There is no heaven for us outside the Catholic
Church. If we thought there was, we would cease to
be Catholics. Our Divine Lord has set up one church
and has told Peter what church it is, and we are
Catholics today because we find the Roman Catholic
Church is the only one that responds to our Lord's
description of His church; the only one which claims
to be in unity with Peter; the only one which has
shown during 2000 years that its principle of unity
and stability is Peter living in his successors.

Why be a Catholic? Because we want to be mem­
bers of some church, and therefore we would -be
members of that particular church against which our
Lord says that the gates of hell shall never prevail.
You may have two houses exactly alike, but if the
one is built on a rock you will go to it rather than to
the one that is built upon sand, because you know it
will not last. So you may find around us many churches

reselnbling the Catholic Church, but when you come
to look at Our Lord's teaching you find that His
church is the church in unity with blessed Peter;
that its source of stability and unity rises from that
fact.



THE VISIBLE CHURCH

The Church established by Christ is still on earth,

"Like a city on the mountain top," despite the slanders

and persecutions of 19 centuries, not changing with

the whims of the ages, but teaching doctrines which

are, in all respects, identical with those
of the first

teachers of the gospel. (See Page 16.)

Amid the continual changes in human institutions

she is the one institution that never changes. She is

the greatest kingdom which men have
established

upon earth; and the only one of the old kingdoms

which still lives in the same city which saw th e rise

and fall of the proudest of all earthly kingdoms. To

her alone was given the command, "Go teach all

nations." (Matt. 28 :19.)

Open the New Testament or read profane history

and you will learn that Christ was visibly
on earth

but a very short time; ·that the term of His public

teaching comprised only three years;
which was occu­

pied chiefly with the instruction of
TWELVE men,

who under a chief, were to constitute His first repre­

sentative corporate Teaching Body; they would be

commissioned by the Son of God to "go forth and
teach

all nations" in His name. They would have successors

in office, since the Kingdom of Christ
was not only to

be world-wide, but would endure until the end of time;

"of His Kingdom there shall be no end" (Luke I, 33).

And though Jesus would return to Heaven,
He would

not be dissociated from His visible Teaching Body
in

the Church: "Behold I am with you all days, even unto

the consummation of the world," (Matt. 28 :30.)

Well, then, does this Kingdom of God upon
earth

merit the appelation of St. Paul: "'The Church of
the

living God" (I T'im. 3 :15); and how
evident that it

must be "the pillar and ground of truth (Ibid.)?
How

plain that the gates of hell will not prevail against

it" (Matt. 16-18)? How reasonable: "if
he will not

hear the Church, let him be to thee as the heathen and

publican" (Matt. 18-17). How logical:
"He that

heareth you heareth Me" (Luke 10-16). IN
VAIN DO

THEY WORSHIP ME TEACHING DOCTRINES
AND

COMMANDMENTS OF MEN. MAT'l'. 15:9.

How could this "Church of the Living God" with

Christ's identical mission have less authority to teach

than Christ Himself? Less power to remove
sin? "As

the Father hath sent Me, I also send you" (John 20:

21) .

This sublime nature of the Church Christ founded,

its divine origin, its supernatural character, preclude

all possibility of one church being as good as another,

of there being any more than one church. In fact, any

religion but His own established
1900 years ago,

is the invention of men and must be severely

condemned by God. "He that despises you, despises

Me" (Luke 10 :16). "He that is not with Me,
is

against Me" (Matt. 12:30). "And there
shall be

one fold and one shepherd" (John 10:16); "How

7



shall they preach unless they be sent" (Rom.
10 :15); "But though we, or an angel from Heaven,
preach a gospel to you beside that which we have
preached to you, let him be accursed" (Gal. 1:8).
How could any religious society not founded by God
be as good as the one founded by Him? How could
500 contradictory sects founded by Henry VII!., Martin
Luther, et al, be "the pillar and ground of truth" (l
Tim. 3 :15)? How can one Church be as good as an­
other, if one teaches truth and the other falsehood?

With non-Catholics the whole Blatter should resolve
itself into a question of fact. Was Jesus Christ God l
Yes, or no? If not, tbere is no use proceeding, as the
whole Christian platform falls and all Christianity is
an imposition. If He was God, He is divine Truth, and
all that He says and proluises are tl."ue. Did He estab­
lisb a visible church l Yes, or no? If He did not,
there is no use looldng for I't l , If He (Ud, then it is
some"vher� in the world today for He declared it ,vas
to last until the end of the world (Luke 1:33).

Did He guarantee His Cluuch agaimoit error f Yes, or
no r If not, "ve never know when it must he believed;
it is not a true guide; it cannot represent Him. If He
did guarantee it against error, then it never has erred
(John 1(; :13). If Inen employ every m.enns, in the'ir
powee for the perpetuation of their ,vorl,;., can we
imagine that God left his great work to drift along
ull�'uidNl and unprotected l If the Bible teaches any­
thing plainly it is tbe visibility of Christ's Church. It
is ('ollll)osed of rulers and subj�cts (Acts 20:28); its
nlemh�rs nre ndmitted hy n visible external rite; they
must hear, and obey. Christ conllJares His Church only
to things visible: a "flo(Ok," a "bouse," a "body," a
"city seated on a mountain." a "kingdoDl.." He calls
it "MY" Church, "THE" Church.

If the Church is not a visible organization what can
St. Luke mean by saying: "There were added (to the
Church) 3.000 souls?" What does the clause in the
creed mean: "I be l ieve in the holy Catholic Church ?"
What does St. Paul mean when he speaks of overseers
appointed by the Holy Ghost "to rule the Church of
God" (Acts 20 :28)?

All history, Pagan, Jewish and Christian, inform
us that Christ founded a Church on Peter some nine­
teen centuries ago, and that it was the only one hav­
ing a right to call itself Catholic. Two Churches
could not both be Catholic as both could not have come
directly from Christ, and have existed throughout the
centuries since Christ, yet we have the "Catholic Epis­
copal," "The Reformed Catholic," etc., all owing their
origin to Luther.

The recorded words of Christ in laying the founda­
tion of His Church are, "Thou art Peter, and upon
this rock I build my Church."

That edifice was built to last until the sunset of the
ages (Luke 1 :38). Christ did not say to Luther "Thou
art Martin, a.n d on you I build my Church"; you shall
establish a heirarchy and have your bishops, and be
Episcopalian, notwithstanding the many absurdities in
point of doctrine of which you will be guilty. (See
Pages 9 and 10.)



"On you Edward, I build my Church." You will

have an altar whereon to offer sacrifice.

"On you James, I build my Church." You shall have

no altar in your Temple.
"'On you Henry, I build my Church." You shall per­

petuate my last supper by means of bread and wine

that are mere figures of the figurative expressions

about My Body and Blood. "Feed my lambs, Feed

my sheep."
Henry divorced his first wife groundlessly, killed

his second, killed (divorced) his fourth, divorced,

(killed) his fifth.
Luther started German Protestantism, a new Re­

ligion, just as Mahomet started a new Religion.
Now what authority had the one more than the

other to do such a thing?
Was Luther, an apostate Monk and a breaker of

vows, the right person to reform Christ's own

Church? Then again to deny the Sacraments, to

defy legitimate authority, throw parts of the Bible

away, etc., etc .. Was that a wise Reformation?

IS IT POSSIBLE 'ro BELIEVE THAT JESUS

FOUNDED A CHURCH TO MISLEAD THE WORIJD,

AND THEN AFTER 1500 YEARS APPROVED OF soo

CONTRADICTORY SECTS FOUNDED BY SUCH MEN

AS THE ABOVE?

But you ntay say, the Protestant Church is the

Church of Chl"ist, purified of error, and only this pur­

fled fornl dates from Luther. I ans'wer tbat you must

choose behveen Luther and Christ. Jesus said His

Cburch would never teach error (John 16:13,); Luther

says it did teach error. If Luther is right Christ is

wrong; if Christ is right, Luther and all his follow­

ers are wrong.

Was Luther a man to be depended upon in the great
concern of religion? Was he divinely inspired or call­
ed in an extraordinary manner? If so, why did God

permit him to fall into so many absurdities in point
of doctrine, a few of which are given here.

1. "'Thou shalt not covet' is a commandment which

proves us all to be sinners; since it is not in any
man's power not to covet, and the same is the drift
of all the commandments, for they are all equally im­

possible to us." De Lib. Chris. tom. 4 :2.
Here is God represented as a merciless tyrant com­

manding things which we have it not in our power
to perform and punishing the non -performer with
eternal tormen IS.

2. HA person that is baptised cannot, though he

would, lose his salvation by any sins how grievous so­

ever, unless he refuses to believe. For no sins can

damn him but unbelief alone." Capt. Bob. tom. 2 foI.
74:1. (See James 2, 17, 20.)

3. "Sin boldly but believe more boldly. Let your faith

be greater than yOUI' sin. It is enough for us, through
the riches of the glory of God, to have known the

Lamb of God who taketh away tile sins of the world.

Sin will not destroy in us the reign of the Lamb, al­

tbough we were to contnlit fornication or Dlurder a

thousand tiDles in one day," Luther; )f"tter to Mf"lan ..h­

thon. Ang. 1. 1521. Andin p. t78.

9



4. "The papists teach that faith in Christ justifies,
indeed, but that God's commandments are to be kept."
Now this is directly to deny Christ and abolish faith.
Ep. Ad. Gal tom. 5, foI. 311: 2.

5. "A prince may gain heaven by bloodshed better
than by prayer." Weimer Ed. Vol. 18, p. 358.

6. "It is not in opposition to the holy scriptures for
a man to have several wives." De-Wette, Vol. 2, p. 459.

Such are the teachings of the first so-called reformer
of Christ's Church, as may be verified by calling at

any first-class library.

But, you may say, was not the Church in a deplor­
able condition in the sixteenth century; were not the
lives of some of its high clergy scandalous? I reply,
yes; it is only too true, but Christ did not guarantee
His Church from scandal, but against error (John
16 :13). There were scandals in the Church even while
Jesus was with it. Judas was a thief, a traitor and
a suicide; Peter, the head, swore to a falsehood;
James and John quarreled over s upremacv : St. Peter
and St. Paul were at variance over circumcision, and
St. Paul excommunicated one of the faithful for un­

speakable lust.
The Church is made up of men, not angels. The

Triumph of the Church is not in being composed of
sinless mortals, but in supplying sinful men with
means to carryon the struggle against their vicious
tendencies. For that reason the Catholic Church has

always been the friend of sinners, although hating
sin. But Jesus by His Divine power granted that
His Church, even if composed of weak and sinful men,
would never teach error. The Church may have needed

house cleaning in the sixteenth century, but the way
to clean house is not to dynamite it.

A child may have a very dirty face and yet be ab­

solutely pure and healthy of skin. A doctor may be a
bad man but a very good doctor. And the Church

may have been scandolous in the lives of some of its

higher dignitaries in the sixteenth century, but nev­
ertheless it was absolutely free from error.-Rev. Ar-

nold Damiens, S. J.
�

THE ROSARY EXPLAINED

The Rosary helps Catholics to learn the Sacred

Scriptures with the right spirit and enables them to
know God better. Prayers in the Rosary, as in
the Mass, are taken from the Bible, and are there­
fore a more perfect expression of our minds to the
mind of God.

Rosary beads have been used from the earliest

times to count prayers. According to a tradition the
Blessed Virgin appeared to St. Dominic in the Thir­
teenth Cen tu ry and asked him to spread the devotion

of the Rosary as an antidote against the heresies of
the time.

The Rosary is comprised of fifteen decades, each

consisting of one Our Father and ten Hail Mary's.
During the recitation of each d ecad e one mystery

10



Confession was instituted by Christ on the day of

His resurrection when He said to the first pastors of

His Church: "As the Father hath sent Me I also send

you." John 20-21. And then as if to clear up all

doubt as to his power He immediately adds, "Receive

ye the Holy Ghost, whose sins ye shall forgive they
are forgiven them." John 20-23.

Even in the old law we see that confession was

made to man as the restitution of the principal and

5th part must have been made to man. Num. 5:6 ,7.

"If we confess our sins He is faithful and just to

forgive us our sins." I John 1 :9. In other words God

who is faithful and just will keep the promise He

made to His first pastors when He said: "Whose sins

you shall forgive they are forgiven." John 20 :23.

Do you consider that a murderer makes a real con­

fession by merely confessing his sins in his own mind

to God? No. Almost every execution proves that he

does not. From experience we know that it is much

easier to tell God our sins in secret, than to go to a

fellow man. But it is just this faith and humility that

God asks.

In James 5 :16 we are told to confess our sins to

one another and pray for one another that we may be

saved. This, however, does not mean public or gen­
eral confession to a friend or neighbor, who has no

power to absolve and may destroy one's character, but

it does mean p ub l ìc or private confession to pastors

of the church to whom God has given the power to

absolve. John 20 :23.

"And many that believed came, confessing their sins

and showing their deeds and many of them also which

used curious arts brought their books together and

burned them before all men and they counted the

price of them at 50,000 pieces of silver." ACTS 19 :18-19.

11

from the life of our Lord or His Mother is con tem­

plated upon.

It is customary to divide the Rosary into three

parts, each part consisting of five decades or mys­

teries, namely, the joyful, the sorrowful, and the

glorious.

The five joyful mysteries are: the annunciation to

the Virgin Mary of Christ's conception; her visit to

her cousin Elizabeth; the birth of Christ; His pres­
entation in the Temple; and His discovery in the

Temple by His parents when as a youth He remained

to dispute with the priests of the Temple. The five

sorrowful mysteries are: Christ's agony in the Gar­

den of Gethsemane; His scourging at the pillar; His

crowning with thorns; His carrying the Cross; His

crucifixion. The five glorious mysteries are: the

resurrection of Christ; His ascension into Heaven;

the descent of the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles;
the assumption of the Blessed Virgin into Heaven;
and her coronation as the Queen of Saints.-Our Sun­

day Visitor, Huntington, Ind.

CONFESSION



PURGATORY

Why should they confess their sins, show their
deeds and burn their books unless they Were compelled
to do so? Here we have contrition, confession and
satisfaction, which clearly shows that St. Paul and
the converts of Ephesus did exactly as the pastors of
the Catholic Church and their people do at the pres­
ent day.-Our Sunday Visitor.

In Catholic Doctrine Purgatory is defined as a condi­
tion of temporary punishment for those who depart
this life guilty of lesser faults, or without having suf­
ficiently atoned for grevious sins already forgiven.

Sins cannot be forgiven in Heaven, for nothing de­
filed can enter there. Neither can they be forgiven in
Hell, for out of Hell there is no redemption. They
must, therefore, be pardoned in some intermedia-te
state or condition of temporary punishment, as may be
plainly seen from the following passages of scripture
taken from the King James Edition of the New Testa­
ment:

"Whoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall
not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in
the world to come." Matt. 12:32. Does this not show
that some sins may be forgiven in the world to come?
Otherwise this passage of scripture would be non­
sensical.

"But I say unto you that every idle word that men

speak, they :- hall give an account thereof, in the day
of judgment." Matt. 12 :36.

This shows there must be a place of temporal pun­
ishment hereafter where slighter faults shall be pun­
ished. Surely God will not consign men to hell for
unrepented idle words.

Would a human judge order a man to be hanged
for a sligh t infraction of law?

"If any man's works burn he shall suffer loss, but
he himself shall be saved yet so as by fire." I Cor.
3 :15.

"I tell thee thou shalt not depart hence, till thou
hast paid the very last m ite." Luke 12 :59; Matt. 5 :26.

Could the apostles have expressed more clearly their
belief in PURGATORY than they have done here? See
2 Peter, 1 :15. This shows that Saint Peter believed in
praying for his friends after his death.

The doctrine of praying for the dead is plainly con­
tained in the Old Testament, and piously practiced
to this day by the Hebrew people and three hundred
and fifty million Catholics.

"And making a gathering he sent 12,000 drachms of
silver to Jerusalem for sacrifice to be offered for the
sins of the dead thinking well and religiously con­
cerning the resurrection.

12



"It is, therefore, a holy and wholesome though t to

pray for the dead, that they may be loosed from sins."

II Mach. 12 :43-46.

Finding they could not, by evasion, weaken the force

of this text, the reformers threw overboard the books

of Machabees like a man who assassinates a
hostile

witness.-OUR SUNDAY VISl'rOR.

ADORATION OF MARY?

It is false to assert that Catholics give the Supreme

honor to Mary which is due to God alone. 'Tis true

Catholics retain pictures and statues of the Virgin

and Saints as a loving mother the pictures of her dear

departed ones. 'Tis also true that Catholics
honor

the Blessed Virgin and invoke her intercessions, be­

lieving she has the power to hear their prayers
and

help them. If the angels and sain ts can
hear our

prayers, and help us, why not she who is justly styled

Queen of Angels and Saints? Gen. 48 :15; Tobias

12:12; Luke 15:10; Zach. 1:12-13, 1 Cor., 6:3.

In 2 Peter 1 :15, we read: "Moreover I will endeavor

you may be able after my decease to
have these things

always in remembrance." This shows that St.
Peter

believed in praying for his friends after his death.

St. John saw four and twenty ancients "who fell

down before the Lamb and all had harps and golden

vials full of odors which are the prayers of the

saints." This proves that the saints in Heaven pray

for us.

Mary was in God's mind from all eternity, when He

decreed that His Divine Son should become incarnate

through her. She was referred to by God when
He

cursed the tempter of Eve.

"I shall place enmities between thee and the woman,

thy seed and her seed." Gen. 3: 15.

She was referred to by Isaias: "A virgin shall con­

ceive and bear a son, and His name shall be called

Emmanuel."-Isaias 7:14.

Thirty-three verses of St. Luke's gospel are devoted

to her. An angel is sent from God to honor her in

the name of God, to pronounce her "blessed among

women," to acquaint her with the lofty dignity to

which God had deigned to elevate her.

Mary is not deserving of adoration, despite her dig­

nity, but think you she deserves to be
almost de­

spised? Will Jesus count as His friends
those who

neglect or insult His mother?

"Behold from henceforth all generations shall call

me blessed." Luke 1 :48. The Catholic is the only

Church whose children, generation after generation,

have pronounced her blessed. While some ministers

of the gospel are loud in their praises of Sarah, Re­

becca, Rachel, etc., they not only ignore Mary's
exalt-

13



ed virtues, but parade her alleged imperfections and
sinfulness.

Father Faber answers the objection of those who
misconstrue Catholic devotion to Mary, which is by
no means an adoration, in these stanzas:

"But scornful men have coldly said
Thy love was leading me from God;
And yet in this l did but tread
The very path my Savior trod.
They know but little of thy worth,
Who speak these heartless words to me.
For what did Jesus love on earth
One-half so tenderly as Thee?"

-OUR SUNDAY VISITOR.

CATHOLIC COUNTRIES UNPROGRESSIVE

This is another common charge against Catholics,
who say in reply: Look at poor Lazarus and look a t
rich Dives. Were the early Christians, who were
flung into the jaws of the lions, doomed to hell, while
Nero and his crew were carried up to Heaven? Did
Jesus come in purple and fine linen? Did he say to the
poor, "Blessed are the rich for theirs is the king­
dom of Heaven?" D'id He say, "The rich have the
gospel preached to them? Did He say it is easier for
a camel to crush through the eye of the needle than
for a poor man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven'1-
Rev. Bernard Vaughan, S. J.

Why Priests Do Not Marry'
Because Christ, the great exemplar of the clergy,

whose ambassadors they are, was not married; St.
John, the Baptist, the immediate forerunner of Christ.
eulogized by Jesus, as "the greatest man born of
woman," was not married.

St. John, the Apostle, the "disciple whom Jesus
loved," is known as "the virgin apostle." The only
apostle who was married, as far as can be learned,
was St. Peter, and if he had a wife at the time he
was called to the ministry, he left her, because he
declared: "We have left all things and followed
Thee." Matt. 19-27.

St. Paul distinctly tells us that he was not married
(I. Cor. 7-8), and he gives an excellent reason why
the clergy should not marry. He says: "He that is
without a wife is solicitous for the things that bélong
to the Lord, how he may please God. But he that is
with a wife is solicitous for the things of the world.
how he may please his wife, and he is divided." I Cor.
7, 32-33.)

Now if any person should be solicitous for the things
of the Lord, the minister of Christ should be. He has
ta ken the Lord as "the portion of his inheritance" and

14



should know no other love. Again Paul tells us:

"Every high priest taken from among men, is or­

dained for men in the things that appertain to God."

(Heb. 5 :1.) He is ordained for men; his time, his tal­

ents, his life, belong to the people committed to his

care; he must be a father to all his parishioners, and

no family ties may stand in the way of efficien t

service.

But does not St. Paul authorize the marriage of

the clergy when he says: "Have we not power to

carry about a woman, a sister, as well as the rest of

the Apostles?" The King James edition mis-translates

this passage by substiting the word ''WIFE'' for

"woman." It is evident that St. Paul does not speak

here of his wife, since he had none (1 Cor. 7-8), but he

alludes to those pious women who voluntarily waited

on the Apostles, and ministered to them in their miss­

ionary journeys. (SEE PHILIPPIANS, 4, 3.)

It is also objected that the Apostles seem to require

that a Bishop be "the husband of one wife" (I Tim. 3,
2). The context certainly cannot mean that a Bishop
must be a married man, for the reason already given,
that St. Paul himself was never married. The sense

of the text, as all tradition testifies, is that no candi.

date should be elected to the office of Bishop who

had been married more than once. It was not possible
in those days always to select single men for the

Episcopal office. Hence the Church was often com­

pelled to choose married persons, but always with this

restriction, that they had never contracted nuptials a

second time. They were obliged, moreover, if not wid­

owers, to live separated from their wives.-OUR SUN­

DAY VISl'rOR.

How About Protestant Marriages?

The Canon Law of the Catholic Church declares

that the marriages of Protestants are to be regarded
as valid, and this should settle the question.

Everyone knows how sacredly the Catholic Church

regards marriage, and how unalterably she is op­

posed to divorce. She teaches that the marriage con­

tract differs from all o thers in this that it had the

Almighty for its direct author, that God Himself unit.

ed our first parents as man and wife; that at the

time He directed them (Genesis 1, 28) "'to increase

and multpily." He blessed them. Hence marriage
from the beginning had a religious aspect. In the

New Dispensation Christ emphasized both the divine

origin of marriage and its indissoluble character

when He said: "What therefore God hath joined to·

gether, let no man put asunder." Christ's union

with His Church is a religious and holy union as

well as lasting; yet St. Paul compares it to the union

of husband and wife. Therefore Christians' marriage
was to be both sacred and indissoluble.-O. S. V ..

Hun tington, Ind.

15



DEPARTURE OF NON-CATHOLIC BODIES FROM APOSTOLIC TEACHING.

FROM "THE FAITH OF OUR FATHERS"

Thefollowing parallel lines show the departure of Protestant bodies from the primi­
tiveteachings of Christianity, and the adhesion of the Catholic Church to them.

APOSTOLIC CHURCH CATHOLIC CHURCH PROTESTANT

1.OurSaviour gives pre-eminence to Pe- T h e C a t h o l i c CHURCH
terovertheother Apostles: "l will give to Church gives the pri- All other Christian
theethekeys of the kingdom of heaven." macy of honor to Pe- communions practic-
Matt.16:19."Confirm thy brethren." Luke ter and to his succes- ally deny Peter's s u ,
22:32."Feedmy lambs; feed my sheep." John sors. premacy over t h e
21:15-16. ---

.
other Apostles.

The CatholIc

Church alone, of all

the Christian com­

munions, claims to

exercise the preroga­

tive of infallibility
in her teaching. Her

ministers a l way s

speak from the pul­
pit as havIng author­

ity and the faithful
receive with implicit
confidence what the

Church teaches, with­

out once questioning
her veracity.

2.TheApostolic Church claimed to be in­

fallibleinherteachings. Hence the Apostles

spokewithunerring authority, and their

wordswerereceived not as human opinions,
butasDivine Truths.

"Whenyouhave received from us the word

ofGod,youreceived it not as the word of

men,but(asit is indeed) the word of God."

r,Thess.2:13.

"Ithathseemed good to the Holy Ghost

andtous,"say the assembled Apostles, "to

laynofurther burden upon you than these

necessarythings." Acts 15 :28.

�4Thoughan angel from heaven preach a

gospeltoyou besides that which we have

preachedtoyou, let them be anathema." Gal.

1:8.

16

A I I Protestant

Churches repudiate
the claim of infalli­

bility. They deny that
such a gift is pos­
sessed by any teach­

ers of religion. The
ministers pronounce

no authoritative doc­

trines but ad vance

opinions as embody­
ing their private in­

terpretation of the

Scripture. And their
hearers are never re­

quired to believe

them, but are to

draw their own con­

cI usions from t h e

Bible.



APOSTOLIC CHURCH

3.OurSaviour enjoins and prescribes rules

forfasting:"When thou fastest, anoint thy

headandwash thy face, that thou appear not

tomentofast
* * • and thy Father who seest

insecret,willrepay thee." Matt.6:17-18.

TheApostles fasted before engaging in sa­

credfunctions. "They ministered to the Lord

andfasted."Acts 13.2. "And when they had

ordainedpriests in every city, they prayed
withfasting." Acts 14 :23.

"Andthedays will come when the brides­

groomshallbe taken away from them and

thentheyshall fast." Luke 5 :35.
.

"AndwhenHe had fasted forty days and

fortynights,afterwards He was hungry.

Matt.4:2.

4."Letwomen," says the Apostle, "keep

silenceinthechurches. For, 'it is not permit­

tedthemtospeak
* • • It is a shame for a

womantospeak in church." I. Cor. 14:34, 35.

CATHOUC CHURCH

T'h e Church always
prescribes fasting to

the faithful at stated

seasons, particularly
during Lent.

A Catholic priest is
always fasting when

he officiates at the

altar.

He breaks his fast

on ly after he says
Mass.

When Bishops or­
dain priests they are
al ways fasting as
well as the candi­

dates for ordination.

The Catholic

Church never permi ts

women to preach in

the house of God.

17

PROTESTANT

CHURCH

Protestan ts h a v e

no law prescribing
fasts, though some
may fast from pri­
vate devotion. They
even try to cast ridi­
cule on fasting as a
work of supereroga­

tion, detrae ting from
the merits of Christ.

Neither candidates

for ordination, nor
the ministers who

ordain them, ever
fast on such occa ,

sions.

Women, especially
in this country, pub­
licly preach in Meth­
odist a n d o t h e r

churches.



APOSTOLIC CHURCH

5.St.Peter and St. John confirmed the

newlybaptized in Samaria. "They laid their

handsonthem and they received the Holy
Ghost."Acts 3 :17.

6.TheSaviour and His Apostles taught
thattheEucharist contains the body and

bloodofChrist. "Take ye and eat; this is my

body.Drinkye all of this for this is my
blood."Matt.26 :26, 28.

.

"'Hethateateth and drinketh unworthily
eatethanddrinketh damnation to himself,
notdiscerning the Lord's body." l. Cor. 11:29.

(Ifitwereonly bread and wine, how can a

manbedamned for partaking unworthily?)

"Unlessyeeat the flesh of the Son of Man

anddrinkHisblood, ye shall not have life in

you."Whenour Saviour, on repeating the

above,beheldJews and many of His disciples
abandoningHim, did he apologize or explain?

Onthecontrary, turning to the chosen

twelve,Hesaid: "Will you also go away?

CATHOLIC CHURCH

E ver y Catholic

Bishop, as a succes­

sor of the Apostles,

imposes hands on

baptized persons in

t h e sacrament of

C o n fi r m ation, by
which they receive

the Holy Ghost.

The Catholic

Church teaches, with

our Lord and His

Apostles, that t h e

Eucharist con tains

really and indeed the

body and blood of

Jesus Christ under

the appearance of

bread and wine.

(If God has given
us the functions to

change bread and

wine into our body
and blood can we

question His Word

when He says "This

is my Body, This is

my Blood?)

18

PROTESTANT

CHURCH

N o denominations

performs the cere­

mony of imposing
hands in this country

except Episcopalians,
and even they do not

recognize Confirma­

tion as a Sacrament.

Christ says, "Un­

less you eat My Flesh

and drink My Blood

you shall not have

life iri you." Protes­

tan ts except, perhaps
a few ritualists, con­

demn this doctrine

of our L o r d as

idolatrous, notwith­

standing t h e f a c t

that t h e y cannot

show any text of

Scripture which de­

clares the Eucharist

to be mere bread and

wine. Christ says:

"This is my body"-



APOSTOLIC CHURCH

And Simon Peter answered Him: Lord, to

whom shall we go? T'hou hast the words of

eternal life." John 6 :68, 69.

(You, my dear reader, must take your
choice. Will you abandon Him or reply with

Peter?)

7. The Apostles were empowered by our

Saviour to forgive sins: ttwhose sins ye shall

forgive they are forgiven." John 20:23.

"God," says Paul, "hath given us the min­

istry of reconciliation." II. Cor. 5 :18.

"And many that believed came, and con­

fessed and shewed their deeds." Acts 19, 18.

Why did they confess their sins and show

their deeds unless they were bound to do so?

This shows that the Apostles heard confes­

sions and forgave sins in accordance with

the power conterred upon them.

8. Of marriage our Saviour says: "Who­

ever shall put away his wife and marry an­

other committeth adultery against her. And if

the wife shall put away her husband and be

married to another, she committeth adult­

ery." Mark 10:11, 12; I. Cor. 7:10, 11.

CATHOLIC CHURCH
There are 14 pas­

sages of Scripture to

prove the real pres­
ence in the following
texts: Matt. 26:28;
Mark 14 :22, 24; Luke

22:19, 20; I. Cor. 11;

23, 25, 27, 29; John 6:

51, 60. 66; I. Cor. 10:

16.

PROTESTANT

CHURCH

The Bishops and
Priests of the Catho­

lic Church, as the in­

heritors of Apostolic
prerogatives, profess
to exercise the min­

istry of reconcilia­

tion, and to forgive
sins in the name of

Christ.

F o l low i n g the

Apostles injunction
the Catholic Church

forbids husband and

wife to separate; and
i f t h e y separate,
neither c a n marry

again during the life
of the other.

19

They say: "It is
not his body."

Protestan ts, on the

contrary, affirm that
God delegates to no
man the power

. of

pardoning sin.

The P I' o t e s t a n t

Churches, as is w e ll

known, have so far
relaxed this rigorous
law of the gospel, as
to allow divorced

persons to re-marry.



HISTORY OF SECTS

Anabaptists

Year PROTESTANT

AUTHORITY QUOTED

NAMEOF SECT

Baptists

Lutheran

Congregationalists
Q,uakers
Do----

. __ .. . _

CatholicChurch

PLACE OF

ORIGIN

Germany .... I Nicolas Stork .. -.-----.

FOUNDER

Rhode Isld ... I Roger Williams .--- ..

Branch of the Meth.

Episcopal Church _

Do ... - .. - .... ---.- ... ----.----

Do .- . . _

Delega tes of Meth-
odist denom. -------­

General Assembly __
General Assembly ._
Henry VIII. .. ._

Free-WillBaptists

----.---.--.,
New

Hamp.,
Benj. Randall . __ . ._

Seventh-DayBaptists ---.-- U. States ._._ General Conference
Campbellites,or Christians Virginia __ ... _ Aex. Campbell .. ------
MethodistEpiscopal .-- .. --- England .. . John Wesley ... --.---- ..

ReformedMethodist -- .. -.-. I Vermont _

MethodistSociety .------- .. ---. New York __
MethodistProtestant o. Baltimore __
TrueWesleyan Methodist New York

Presbyterian(Old School) Scotland
Presbyterian(New School) Philadelphia
Epsicopalian.... -.--.--.--- .. -.-.... England .

.

Germany ._._ Martin Luther --------

England . __ Robert Browne _

England ._ George Fox .. _
America Williain Penn

Jerusalem ._ Jesus Christ

20

1521.. Vincent L. Millner, "Reli­
gious Denominations."

1639 __ "The Book of Religions,"
by John Hayward.

1780 __ Ibid.

1833 .- W. B. Gillett.
1813 __ "Book of Religions."
1739 __ Rev. Rat. Bangs, in His­

tory of all Denominations

1814 __ Ibid.

1820 __ Rev. W. M. Stilwell.
1830 __ J: R. Williams.
1843 __ J. Timberman.

1560 __ J. M. Krebs.
1840 __ Joel Parker, D. D.
1534 __ Macauley and other Eng­

lish Historians.
1524 __ S. S. Schmucker in His-

tory of all Denominations
1583 __ E. W. Andrews.
1647._ English Historians.
1681 __ American Historians.
33 New Testament.



THE BIBLE AN AUTHORITY ONLY

IN CATHOLIC HANDS

It Is Necessa1'y to Prove Reliability of the Book

A logical discussion between a Catholic and a
Protestant on the thesis: "Which is the true Reli­

gion ?" could not get beyond the starting point. The
Protestant admits his church's fallibility as well as
his own, therefore what does his interpretation of
Scripture amount to? If he admits the infallibility
of the Catholic Church, no arguments against her

teachings can hold. If he rejects the infallibility
of the Catholic Church, he kicks the ground from
under his own feet, because without such infallibility
he could not prove that the Bible contains God's

revelation at all. Yet he pretends to base his b e l'ief
on that book.

Let us suppose an oral debate were to take place.
To be logical, it would start something like this:

Catholic: Before launching into this discussion, it
seems to me that we must first determine what will
be the authority mutually recognized whereby we
shall each endeavor to prove our claims.

Protestant: Agreed; and, it goes without saying,
that ..this authority will be the Bible.

Cath.: But the Bible can be reliable authority only
for me.

Prot.: What impertinence! Every Protestant recog­
nizes the Bible as authority, in fact the only author­
ity in religious matters.

Cath.: But most inconsistently; and surely it can­
not be so regarded by these judges, who are to de­
cide the merits of our arguments in this debate.

Prot.: Why, I do not understand you; and I doubt
whether the judges, or anyone else here present,
understands you.

Cath.: Then I will explain: Neither you nor the
judges are sure that the Bible contains God's revela­
tion, pure and un adu l tera ted, whilst I am. If you
are not sure of this, how can you appeal to it as
decisive au thorfty?

Prot.: But I am sure of it.

Cath.: l would be pleased to hear your proofs.
And you surely will concede that the reliability of
the Bible, as undisputed authority, must be settled
before we can presume to prove anything from it.

Prot.: Why, where is there a Protestant Christian
who hesitates to accept the Bible as a book contain­
ing God's revelation? And since the judges are not
unbelievers, why try to prove what is accepted as a
fact?

Catll.: Our audience will probably comprise some
unbelievers; and even if it did not, since our argu­
ments are to be supported by the Bible, the solidity
of this foundation is the first point to prove.

Prot.: It is a recognized fact both by yourself and
me, and that should be sufficient.

Cath.: It is a fact accepted solely on my Church's
word, which you claim may err, and, therefore, might

21



ha ve erred when she declared the
Bible's authenticity

and inspira t.ìon. Moreover, there
are many in this

audience possibly some of our judges,
who are not

sure that the Holy Book is what we claim
for it.

Prot.: Anyone familiar with the Bible
must be

convinced that it was written at the instigation
of

God.

Cath.: Some parts of the Old Testament bear
con­

trary earmarks. The
Mohammedans say about the

Koran, and the Mormons about
Joe Smith's Revela­

tions, what you say about the Bible; yet you
and I,

and millions of others, fail to see it that way.
No

book or written document proves its
own authenti­

city. A last will or other important
document is

accepted as genuine only when proved to
be so by

credible living witnesses. Moreover, none of
the

Apostolic writings, unless it be Revelations,
whose

authenticity many Protestants deny: assert
their own

inspiration. St. Paul tells us that "all scripture
di­

vinely inspired is profitable," but he nowhere
tells

us what portion or books are inspired. The present

Bible omits many writings which were long reputed

to be inspired.
Prot.: There were such witnesses as you demand.

Cath.: Do you know this from the Bible?

P1·ot.: No.

Cath.: Then even your first act of faith is not

based on the Bible, is not supported by the Bible; yet

you say the Bible is the sole foundation
of the faith

which you profess. If you cannot prove the first

fundamental of your creed by the Bible, how can you

say that the Bible is your only rule of faith? More­

over, consistency is the first requisite which judges

must require of a disputant. If the "Bible and Bible

only" theory and the "Private Judgment" theory are

the boasts of Protestants, people must needs expect

that they are provable.
Prot.: I have said that we have witnesses to prove

the genuineness of the Bible, but you do not admit

them.

Catll.: Because that is tantamount to an admission

of Tradition as a "Rule of Faith," which you reject.

However, tell me who those witnesses are.

Prot.: The early Christian writers.

Cath.: Not very early, because the New 'I'es tam en t

writings were not gathered together and declared to

be divinely inspired, until the fourth century. More­

over, these witnesses were Catholics, and accepted

the Scriptures as divinely inspired, because their

Church declared them to be so. Was their Church

infallible then?

Prot.: I am not prepared to grant that it was.

Cath.: Then how can you hold as an infallible

truth that the writings, known as the Sacred Scrip­

tures, for whose reliability you have the Catholic

Church's word alone, are inspired? It is, as I fore­

knew: you simply take for granted, and most incon­

sistently, (because you say you accept nothing in

religion, unless it is supported by the Bible) that the

Bible contains God's revelation. You take more than

this for granted, viz.: that followers of the Ca.th o-

22



lic Church transcribed and translated the original
writings without making any errors, that they never
altered a line, that they preserved them until the
sixteenth century in their original purity and same­
ness. Unless you grant all this, while believing that
the Catholic Church fell into gross errors otherwise.

you cannot appeal to the Scriptures, as they now ex­
ist. as divine authority.

Prot.: (silent).
'Ve Advance Another Step

Cnth.: Let us, for the sake of advancing one step
further, suppose that both of us can consistently re­
gard the Scriptures as inspired, and hence as author­
ity for determining what is revealed truth or not.
Are the present day versions of the Bible sufficiently
accurate to warrant an appeal to them?

Prot.: They have been carefully co mpa.r'e d with
the original a number of times, and declared not to
differ materially.

Cath.: The original apostolic writings have been
lost for centuries, and hence such comparison is
impossible.

Prot.: But old Greek and Latin copies still exist.
Catlt.: But being only copies of the original, how

know you that they themselves are not faulty?
Prot.: If the old Catholic versions were faithful

copies, present-day Bibles must be equally reliable,
because they conform very closely with the former.

Cntlt.: But if the Catholic Church be the institu­
tion which you have always held it to be-one that
has greatly erred, that became corrupt, is it not
likely that she tampered with the Scriptures, changed
them to support her errors (?), etc.?

Prot.: We have no authority to presume this.
Catlt.: And you have no authority not to presume

this. Errors could have crept in to copies and trans­
lations, even though they were not intentionally
made. Remember that the oldest versions now ex­
tant might be copies of a long series of copied ver­
sions.

Prot.: Well, l have as much right to presume they
are reliable as you have.

Cath.: No, you haven't. I believe that my Church
was divinely protected from error when she declared
the Vulgate to be a faithful version of the original
Scriptures, while you do not so believe. Moreover.
it is admitted that the King James version is faulty
in several thousand points. You are ever breaking
away from your theory of "Nothing but the Bible,"
and basing your arguments on Tradition, or on the
authority of the Catholic Church, which you, on
principle, repudiate.

Since the Protestant world accepts the Bible solely
on the authority of the Catholic Church, which in
all other matters it disowns, it has to l)reSUme, in­
consistently, that no uninspired books are included
in the Bible, and no inspired ones excluded; that
every book, chapter, and verse is a faithful and
accurate rendition of the original. Isn't this pre­
suming too much? Isn't it a weak foundation to
base "The Bible Only" theory on? Surely yOU do not

23



pretend to be able to prove these all important
de­

tails in their connection with the reliability of pres­

ent-day copies of the Bible, do you?

Prot.: (silent).

Concession M�de by Catholic to Enable Argument

to Con.tinue

Cath.: We shall assutne, in order to advance an­

other step, that our present-day Bible is an accurate

rendition of the original inspired writings. Now, I

am prompted to ask whether the "Bible alone, inter­

preted by Private JU(lgnlent" was ever in tended
to

be the Christian's rule of faith.

Prot.: I do so hold.

Cath.: I await your proof with eagerness.

Prot.: Christ gives it in these words: "Search the

Scriptures, for in them ye think ye have eternal

life, and they are they which give testimony of

me" (John V, 39).
Cath.: You surprise me, my friend. At that time

there was not a line of the New Testament written.

Christ was talking to the Jews, whom neither His

words nor works could convince of His divinity.

He told them to "search the Scriptures"-the Old

Testament prophetic writings-which testified con­

cerning Him. Moreover, His remark contained the

same rebuke, which I am administering to you­

"in them YE THINK ye have eternal life." The

Jewish religion existed before the Old Testament was

written, just as the Christian Church existed before

the New Testament was written.

Prot.: The Christian .religion existed before the

New Testament was written?

Cath.: Surely. Peter converted three thousand be­

fore the first word of the New 'I'est.arnen t was writ­

ten. Paul had converted hundreds of Romans and

Corinthians, and Galatians and Thessalonians before

he wrote his epistles to those congregations; and

all the Apostles were dead, and multitudes had died

martyrs, before St. John wrote the last part of the

New Testament. Until the end of the first century

the "Word of God" could have been delivered only

by word of mouth; people received their faith "by

hearing" (Rom. X, 71).
Prot.: Well, it is evident that the Apostles' in­

spired pr-eachfng was as good as their inspired writ­

ing.
Catll.: But before the Apostles wrote, many others

were preaching who were not inspired; for instance,

Timothy, Titus, Polycarp, Clement, Ignatius, Ire­

naeus. The New Testament was not completed until

thirty-five years after Peter and Paul and most of

the other Apostles were dead; many of their imme­

diate successurs had been martyred and it is likely

tha t the third or fourth successors of the several

Apostles were converting souls without the Bible
.

when St. John finished his writings. In fact, the

whole Roman Empire was Christian, at least 10,000,-

000 people were true to Christ unto a martyr's death,

the Church enjoyed her golden age, before anybOdy

ever saw the New Testament. For four centu rf es

people received their faith "by hearing."

24



Prot.: How, then, do you explain Acts XVII and
11? In verse 2, we are told that St. Paul reasoned
with the Thessalonians on three Sabbath days "out
of the Scriptures," and in verse 11, Paul says, that
the Bereans '''search�d the Scriptures whether these
things were so." Now, verse 2 surely implies that
St. Paul used the Bible; and verse 11 that the Berea.ns
had it.

Cath.: But not the New Testament, for very little
of it was written at that ime. Read verse 3, and
it will be plain that he was appealing to the pro­
phetic writings of the Old Testament, showing them
that Christ was to suffer and to rise again. He
didn't prove from the Scriptures that Christ had al­
ready suffered. The same applies to verse 11.

It was late in the fourth century that the Catho­
lic Church declared which among the many doubt­

fully inspired writings, scattered throughout the
world, were really inspired. It was this late in the
Christian era before the present New Testament writ­
ings were gathered together ìn one book. You seem
to surmise that the Bible was given from Heaven like
the Ten Commandments were-as the Christian's rule
of faith; or that Christ wrote the New Testament;
or that the Apostles were ordered to write it as a
text book. Its origin is quite different, and nothing
is better established by history than that the first
Christians were not Bible Christians. Are you able
to offer contradictory proof?

Prot.: ---- (silent).
'rhe "Bible Only" Theory Is Not Historical

Cath.: Not only was the Bible not the Christian's
Rule of Faith during the first four centuries, but it
was not during the next thousand years.

Prot.: Granting that it was not, that is not evi­
dence that it should have been. We know that your
Church kept it from the people.

Cntll.: That charge is as historically untrue as
was your impression that the early Christians had
the Bible. The generality of Christians had not the
Bible before the fifteenth century, because it was not
possible for them to have it.

Prot.: Why was it not possible for them to have
the Bible?

Catll.: For the simple reason that there was no
paper to print on until the thirteenth century, and
the printing press itself was not invented until the
year 1438, more than one thousand years after the
true canon of the Bible was determined. Without
the printing press, it was surely impossible to dis­
tribute Bibles by hundreds of thousands. It required
several years of work, distributed over many hours
of the day, to produce one copy of the Bible. All
Bibles that existed were in manuscript-from Genesis
to Revelations.

Prot.: So your Church hadn't the Bible until
Protestants gave it to you in the fifteenth century?

Cath.: You misunderstand me; there were thou­
sands of copies, each written by hand on vellum, an
expensive material, but they were too expensive for
the people to own. The first Protestants took our
Bible, and not we theirs.

25



Prot.: Who copied these by hand?

Cath.: The lazy ( ?) monks you have often read

about. In most monasteries, from the early centuries,

the daily occupation of many monks
consisted in

copying the Scriptures for the benefit
of the world.

Some excellent specimens exist, one of them
now

being displayed at the Congressional Library,
in

Washington, D. C.

Prot.: Were they written to be sold to the people?

Cath.: They were written to be at the people's

service. A copy of the manuscript-Bible was usually

placed on a large table in church,
where the people

who could read might have the benefit of it. It

should be plain that few people could afford the price

of a manuscript Bible, which required several years'

work and costly material for its production.

Prot.: Why, does not history tell us that your

Church chained the Bible so that people might not

learn anything from it?

Cath.: An anti-Catholic fable, not history, teaches

that. The thick cover of the Bible was chained to

the floor, so that no one might steal the
valuable

work; but the Bible was displayed in
the church,

wide-open, precisely that it might be read.

Prot.: Does not history tell that Martin Luther

accidentally discovered the Bible in the library
of

the University of Erfurt?

Cath.: That also is a canard, fabricated by ene­

mies of the Catholic Church, for those who have

never read, and never will read true history. Why,

the printing press was invented forty years before

Luther, and acco rd.ing to Hallam, a Protestant his­

torian, the Catholic Bible was the first book printed.

In 1877 there were exhibited hundreds of old Bibles,

at South Kensington, England; it was called the

"Ca.x ton Exhibition," and among them were nine

German editions of the Bible, printed in Ge rrrrarry,

before Luther was born; and there were more than

one hundred editions of the Latin Bible, the very

thing Luther is pretended to have discovered. This

led the Protestant "Church Times" to write:

"This will be very useful for one thing, at any

rate, as disproving the popular lie about Luther

finding the Bible at Erfurt, about 1507."

Prot.: (silent).

'1'he Bible Always Existed in the Language of the

People

Prot.: Were not most of the copies of the Scrip­

tures before the Reformation written in Latin?

Cath.: Most of them, yes.

Prot.: How could the people be benefited by an

open Bible then?

Catb.: In which language do you think they should

have existed?

Prot.: Why, in the language of the people, of

course.

Cath.: But Latin was the language of the people

until the ninth century. Hence St. Jerome's t ra.ns la ,

tion of the fifth century was called "T'he Vulgate,"

Le., the Scriptures for the people. Latin
was the

principal language of the educated until the
so-called

26



Reformation. Therefore, the Bible was al ways 1n

the language of the people. What our unreasonable

critics need most is a correct knowledge of history.
Most modern languages were not only formed from

the Latin, but for several centuries were so similar

to it, that the common people of Italy, France, Spain
and Portugal understood Latin.

Prot.: I would thank you for proof that the Catho­

lic Church made good use of the Bible in instruct­

ing the people before the Reformation.

Cath.: Proof is so abundant that it will be a pleas­
ure to accommodate you. The Mass, which has al­

ways been the principal service of the Church, is

almost all Scripture; at every Mass it was customary
to read a selection from the Bible and to preach a

sermon bearing on the same; to inspire respect for

the Holy Word of God, the people were asked to

stand in reverent attitude while the Gospel of the

day was read; the priest always kissed the page
from which he read, in order to increase the rever­
ence of his people. The sermons of the middle-ages
were, so to speak, made of the Scriptures. The di­

vine office (the brevta.ry) , which was publicly chant­

ed in church, was almost wholly composed from the

Bible. The Rosary, a popular devotion, was to help
instruct the people in the Scriptures; the whole life
of Christ, and the fundamentals of New Testament

teaching are meditated on when the Rosary is prop­

erly said. To instruct the p eo p l e, before the world

possessed any printed books, the "Miracle Plays,"
"Passion Plays" were everywhere staged, so that
the common people knew far more about the Scrip­
tures than they do today. How do you suppose that

Chaucer, Dante, Shakespeare and other Christian au­

thors received their intimate knowledge of the Scrip­
tures? What enabled Michael Angelo, Murillo,
Raphael and other Catholic sculptors and artists to

portray in stone and on canvas such significant Bible

lessons?

Prot.: Are there any Protestant historians who

repudiate the charge that the Bible was not circu­
lated before Luther?

Cafh.: Many of them. I shall mention only a few

now; but if you want more testimony, you may have
it for the asking. Dr. McGilfert (Martin L'u'th e r

nnd His Work," page 2,73) says:
"If Luther was ignorant of the Bible, it was

his own fault. The notion that Bible-reading was
frowned upon by ecclesiastical authorities of that

age is quite unfounded."

Dr. Maitland in his ("Dark Ages," page 469) writes:

"The fact is . . . the writings of the Dark

Ages are, if I may use the expression, made of
the Scriptures."
MurzeI ("History of Ger:many," vol., II, p. 22,3) says:

"Before the time of Luther the Bible had al­

ready been translated and printed in both High
and Low Dutch."

Prot.: (silen t).

Our Sunday Visitor Press,
Huntington, Ind.

27



THE CHURCH AND SCIENCE

Have Catholics been blind to scientific discovery

and literary merit by reason of their Faith?

They have, if you. rely on the enormous amount

of defamatory literature sent out by the enemies

of Christ's Holy Church. But a glance at a few

names here given speaks louder; these are people

known alike for their devotion to their Catholic

Faith and for their contribution towards untold

blessings enjoyed here, there, everywhere.

AstronoDly-Algue, Copernicus, deVico, Ga.s sen d y ,

Laplace, Regiomontanus, Secchi, Torricelli.

Biology-Bernard, Carnoy, Fabre, Detussien, O'Dwyer,

Windle.

Botany-Cesalpinus, Charles and Louis Tulasne.

Chemistry-Becquerel, Chevreul, Despretz, La Vosler.

Paracelsus, Van Helmont.
"

Ele'ctricity-Ampete, Carre, Caselli, Conbomb, Fau­

couIt, Gramme, Madame Currie, Marconi,
Volta.

Geology-Collona, Delauny, Harey, Muller, Spada,

Stensen.

Mathematics-Boscorvitch, Charles, Ferari, ylanudes,
Sestini, Vieta.

Mechanics-Boselli, Burke, Castelli, Charpentier,

Jouffrey, Mariotte, Parsons, Pascal.

Music-Beethoven, Bellini, Elgar, Gounod, Haydn.

Mascagni, Mozart, Palestrino, Perosi, Verdi.

Medicine-Avenbrugger,

Fabricius, Morgagni,
Vesalius.

Navigation-Cabot, Columbus, Cortes,

Polo, Santa Cruz, Butler, Durer.

Columbus, De

Muller, Murphy,

Chaulic,
Pasteur.

Magellan,

Painting-Angelico, Giotto, Michael Angelo, Raphael,

Reub en s, Ferrati.

Physfcs-Babinet Biot, Fresnel, Grimaldi,
Mollet.

Plateau, RegnaIt, Schwann, Zamboni.

Printing-Guttenberg, Merganthaler, Horgan.

War-Barry, Castellan, Foche, Joffre, Petain, Sobieski.

We might add innumerable writers, theologians, and

philosophers such as Dante, Leonardo da Vinci,
James

Harris Rogers, Claudel, etc., etc.

CATHOLIC LIT'ERATURE SOCIETY.

28



NAME

Date of

Election Date
or Con- of
secratìon Death

St. Melchiades

St. Sylvester ..
St. Mark .....

St. Julius

St. Liberus

St. Damasus ..

St. Siricius

St. Anastasius I

St. Innocent L

St. Zosimus

St. Boniface I

St. Celestine I
St. Sixtus III.

St. Leo I ....

St. Hilary
St. Simplicius.
St. Felix III..

St. Gela.s
ì

u s

St. Anastasius

II .

St. Symmachus
St. Hormisdas

St. John I. ...

St. Felix IV ..

Boniface II ..

John II .

St. Agapetus I
St. Silverius

Vigilius
Pelagius l .
John III .

CATHOLIC CHURCH ABSTRACT OF TITLE

FROM ST. PETER TO PRESENT POPE

As recorded in History and in the Registers of the
Catholic Church.

Every believer in the Divinity of Christ confesses
that He was the TRUTH; therefore, any departure
from His doctrine must have been away from the

TRUTH, and any reformation of His Church or moral
standard would change the TRUTH into a falsehood.
The word of the Lord endureth for ever. Rom. 1.25.

Therefore in the matter of which Church there should

be no room for opinion. What the Son of God taught
is all fact.

HERE IS THE ABSTRACT OF TITLE OF THE

CATHOLIC CHURCH without a single break, brought
down from ST. PETER to the present Pontiff.

ABSTRACT-SUPREME PONTIFFS

NAME

Date of

Election Date

or Con- of

secratìon Death

St. Peter 41

St. Linus 67

St. Cletus 79

St. Clement I. 91

St. Evaristus. 100

St. Alexander. 109

St. Sixtus 119

St. Telesphorus 128
St. Hyginus .. 138
St. Pius 142

St. Anicentus 157

St. Soter 168

St. Eleutherus 177

St. Victor I .. 190

St. Zephyrinus 202
St. Cal ixtus I. 218

St. Urban I 222

St. Pontianus. 230

St. Anterus .. 235

St. Fabian ... 236

St. Cornelius 251
St. Lucius 253
St. Stephen I. 254
St. Sixtus II.. 257

St. Dionysius. 259
St. Felix 269

St. Eutychianus 275
St. Gaius 283
St. Marcellinus 296
St. Marcellus. 307

St. Eusebius 309

65-67

79

91

100

109

119

126

137

142

156

167

176

189

202

217

222

230

235

236

250

253

254

257

258

268

274

283

296

304

309

309

310 314

314 335

336 336

337 352

352 366

336 384

384 398

398 401-2

402 417

417 418

418 422

422 432

432 440

440 461

461 468

468 483

483' 492

492 496

496 498

498 514

514 523

523 526

526 530

530 532

532 535

535 536

536 538

537 555

555 560

560 573

29



ABs'rRACT-CONTINUED

NAME

Date of

Election Date

or Con- of

secratìon Death

578

590

604

606

60'7

615

618

625

638

640

642

649

655

657

672

676

678

681

683

685

686

687

701

705

707

708

715

731

741

752

752

757

767

768

772

795

816

817

824

827

827

844

847

855

858

867

872

882

884

885

Stephen VI

Formosus

Boniface VI ..

Stephen VI

(VII)
Romanus

Theodore IP ..

John IX

Benedict IV ..

Leo V

Christopher
Sergius III ..
Anastasius

Lando .

John X .

Leo VI

Stephen VIII .

John XI

Leo VI (VII).

Stephen IX ..

Marinus Il ...

Agapetus II ..

John XII ....

Leo VIII

Benedict V ..

John XIII

Benedict VI ..

Benedict VII ..

John XIV

Boniface VII .

John XV .

Gregory V .

Sylvester II ..
John XVII ...

John XVIII ..

Sergius IV
Benedict VIII.

John XIX

Benedict IX ..

Gregory VI ..

Clement II

Damascus II ..

St. Leo IX .

Victor II .

Stephen X .

Benedict X ..

Nicholas II ..

Alexander II

St. Gregory VII

Victor III ....

NA�1E

Date of

Election Date

or Con- of

secration Death

1 Antipope.
2

Pope Theodore II's pontificate lasted only twenty

days.

Benedict I

Pelagius II ...

St. Gregory l.

Sa.b
ì

n
ì

anu s

Boniface III ..

St. Boniface IV

St. Deusdedi t .

Boniface V ...

Honorius

Severinus ....

John IV

Theodore I .

St. Martin .

St. Eugenius I

St. Vitalianus.

Adeodatus ...

Donus

St. Agatho ...

St. Leo II

St. Benedict II

John V .

Conon

St. Sergius 1. .
John VI .

John VII .

3isinnius

Cons tantine I.

St. Gregory II

St. Gregory III

St. Zacharias .

Stephen II ...

Stephen III ..

St. Paul I

Cons tan tine IP

Stephen IV
Hadrian I .

St. Leo III .

Stephen V

St. Paschal I

Eugenius II ..

Valentinus '"

Gregory IV ..

Sergius II ...

St. Leo IV

Benedict III ..

St. Nicholas I.

Hadrian II .

John VIII .

Marinus I .

Hadrian III ..

574

578

590

604

607

608

615

619

625

640

640

642

649

654

657

672

676

678

682

684

685

686

687

701

705

708

708

715

731

741

752

752

757

767

768

772

795

816

817

824

827

827

844

847

855

858

867

872

882

884

30

885

891

\ 896

896

897

897

898

900

903

903

904

911

913

914

928

929

931

936

939

942

946

955

963

964

965

973

974

983

984

985

996

999

1003

1003

1009

1012

1024

1033

1045

1046

1048

1049

1055

1057

1058

1059

1061

1073

1086

891

896

896

897

897

900

903

903

904

911

913

914

929

929

93]

936

939

942

946

955

964

965

965

972

974

983

984

985

996

999

1003

100'3

1009

1012

1024

1033

1045

1046

1047

1048

1054

1057

1058

1059

1061

1073

108.5

1087

,



A8S":rltACT-CONTINUED

Date of Date of

Election Date Election Date

NAl\Πor Con- of NAME or Con- of

secration Death secration Death

Urban II 1088 1099 Eugenius IV . 1431 1447

Paschal II ... 1099 1118 Nicholas V ... 1447 1455

Gelasius II · . 1118 1119 Calixtus III .. 1455 1458

Calixtus II ... 1119 1124 Pius II . ..... 1458
1464

Honorius II 1124 1130
Paul II 1464 1471

Innocent II 1130 1143
Sixtus IV .... 1471 1484

· .

Innocent VIII. 1484 1492
Celestine II · . 1143 1144

Alexander VI. 1492 1503
Lucius II ••• ti 1144 1145 Pius III 1503 1503
Eugenius III . 1145 1153 Julius II ..... 1503 1513
Anastasius IV 1153 1154 Leo X 1513 1521

Hadrian IV 1154 1159 Hadrian VI .. 1522 1523

Alexander III. 1159 1181 Clement VII 1523 1534

Lucius III 1181 1185 Paul III 1534 1549

Urban III .... 1185 1187 Julius III .... 1550 1555

Gregory VIII. 1187 1187 Marcellus II 1555 1555

Clement III .. 1187 1191 Paul IV 1555 1559

Celestine III 1191 1198 Pius IV ...... 1559 1565

Innocen t III 1198 1216 St. Pius V 1566 1572

Honorius III . 1216 1227 Gregory XIII. 1572 1585

Gregory IX · . 1227 1241 Sixtus V ..... 1585 1590

Celestine IV 1241 1241 Urban VII 1590 1590

Innocent IV .. 1243 1254 Gregory XIV. 1590 1591
Alexander IV. 1254 1261 Innocent IX 1591 1591

Urban IV 1261 1264 Clement VIII. 1592 1605

Clement IV 1265 1268 Leo XI ...... 1605 1605

Gregory X ... 1271 1276 Paul V 1605 1621
Innocent V 1276 1276 Gregory XV 1621 1623

Hadrian V ... 1276 1276 Urban VIII .. 1623 1644

John XXI .... 1276 1277 Innocent X 1644 1655

Nicholas'III .. 1277 1280 Alexander VII 1655 1667

Martin IV 1281 1285 Clement IX .. 1667 1669

Honorius IV 1285 1287 Clement X ... 1670 1676

Nicholas IV .. 1288 1292 Innocent XI .. 1676 1689

St. Celestine V 1294 1294 Alexander VIII 1689 1691

Boniface VIII. 1294 1303 Innocent XII . 1691 1700

Benedict XI .. 1303 1304 Clement XI 170'0 1721

Clement V ... 1305 1314 Innocent XIII 1721 1724

John XXII ... 1316 1334 Benedict XIII. 1724 1730

Benedict XII . 1334 1342 Clement XII 1730 1740

Clement VI 1342 1352 Benedict XIV. 1740 1758

Innocen t VI .. 1352 1362 Clement XIII. 1758 1769

Urban V ..... 1362 1370 Clement XIV. 1769 1774

Gregory XI · . 1370 1378 Pius VI ...... 1775 1799

,
Urban VI 1378 1389 Pius vn ..... 1800 1823

Clement VII 1378 1394 Leo XII 1823 1829

Benedict XIII. 1394 1423 Pius VIn 1829 1830

Boniface IX 1389 1404 Gregory XVI. 1831 1846
Innocent VII . 1404 1406 Pius IX ...... 1846 1877

Gregory XII 1406 1415 Leo XIII .... 1877 1903
Alexander V 1409 1410 Pius X 1903 1914

John XXIII .. 1410 1415 Benedict XV 1914 1922

Martin V .... 1417 1431 Pius XI . .... 1922

31



IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THE

CHURCH OF THE IGNORANT?

Well, maybe. But note this only partial list of the

many brilliant minds in the literary field alone, who

in recent memory, have come into the Catholic Church

in adult life with eyes wide open:

Sheila Ii:ay-Smith, Sigrid Undset. Paul Claudel, G.

K. Chesterton, Compton Macl�enzie, Alfred Noyes,

Joyce Kilmer, F. Marion Crawford, Giovanni Pnpini,

Johanes Jorgensen, Maurice Baring, Theodore Mayn­

ard, Ronald Knox, Sir Bertram C. A. '''Vindle, Shane

Leslie, "Rh'hard Dehan," Max Penlberton, John L.

Stoddard, Aubrey de Vere, Robert Hugh Benson, Cov­

entry Patmore, "Artemus Ward," Joel CJuuuller Har­

rille, :rtIicha�1 Willianls, Rose Hawtborne, "John Ays­

cough," Henry Harland, C. C. Martindale, Richard

Lynn Ed!iial, Robert H. Lord, Lucas Malet, Mary An­

gela Dickens, Cecil Chesterton, Frank H. SpearnIan,

Selden P. Delany, Charles Wnrren Stoddard" Isabel

Clarke, Mrs. Hugh Fraser, Wilfred Meynell, Enid

Dennis, George Parsons Lathrop, Kathel'ine E. Con­

way, C. Kegan Pani, "Guy Thorne," Jobn William

Conybear, Anita Bartle, Ed'V\'in Harrison Bal·ker,
Olive Constance, Dom Bede Cumm, John S"vinnerton,

Norman Wise, etc.

Of 3,000 American converts 372 "ve're Protestant.

clergymen, 115 doctors, 126 la,vyers, 45. fornler Inem­

bers ot Congress, 12 governors of states, 180 Army

and Navy officers, and 206 authors, musicinns and

persons of cultural pronlinence. You Illay have over­

looked the tolJowing figures gleaned from a recent
issue of. "Our Sunday Visitor."

Yes, the Catholic Church is the church of the ignor­

ant-the church of the intelligentsia-the church for

every man, no matter what his race, color, so eta.l

status or type of mind.

When you hear of the ignorant Catholic, remember

that the pages of history are replete with names in

literature, science, art, progress and learning of every

de�i('ription, of which not only Cntholics, but the

world itself is proud. The above list is of liternry
converts only, by ,vhich we Blean to prove thnt a man

or wom'an does not have to be born and rnised a

CathoJie, does not have to cnnve'rae with a priest or

nun, before seeing the first light of Catholicism.

Catholic Information Society,

Narberth, Pa.

32



I

MODERN MINDS SHALL

BUT-

SS AWAY,

Nineteen hundred years ago a Roman orator was

publicly scoffing at the teaching of the followers of

Christ; and while he was sp ea.k ìng a priest in the

catacombs was saying a Requiem Mass, and a woman
was weeping and smiling and praying.

She 'WRS we,eping because of the loss of a beloved

husband. She 'wus snliling because he had confessed

his sins to a priest and had gone to his death with

lIis God in his IJreast. Site "vas praying because she

be lfeved God would heed her entreaties to tali;e her

Jrusband soon front Purgatory into Heaven.

Today in a famous cathedral a '''modernistic'' cleric
is preaching against the "absurdtt.ìes" of Hell and

Purgatory and other fundamental Christian beliefs;
and while he is preaching other widows are weeping
and smiling and praying for the same reasons as had
the woman in the catacombs nearly twenty centuries

ago.

Nineteen hundred years hence, new leaders of
"isms" will be resurrecting dead and discounted

heresies of the ages before and preaching them un­
der the ego-satisfying names of "Modern Thought"
and "Scientific Enlightenment."

And while they are so preaching, Catholics of the

39th century will be assisrng at Mass, confessing to a

priest, and adhering to a l tIle Catholic beliefs t'hat

we adhere to today-that the Apostles believed and

taught in the first half of the first Christian century.

For e,rery Catholic Icnows
.

that 'neither time nor

man can alter by a whit t'he truths which God r'e­

vealéd to man and about which Christ Himself said:

"Heaven and earth shall pass away but My word

shall not pass away."
.

Every year on the second day 6f November (All
Souls' Day) every CathQIic priest 'thr01lghout the

world O' ers up Mass for all departed sou],s. At all

times, and especially during the month of November,
the Church exllOrts e-,rery Catllolic in the 'wO'rld to re­

me.mber in Itis prayers .the dead O'f all ages unrì all

peO'ples. SO' you see, dear NeighbO'r, ,ve Catholics pray

l·egularly for yO'ur departed ones and some day we

shall be praying fO'r the welfare of your own Im­

mO'1·tal soul.

Catholic Information Society,

Narberth, Pa.

IMPRIMATUR

MOST REV. JOHN J. CANTWELL, D.D.,

BISHOP OF LOS ANGELES AND SAN DIEGO.