J'': - '"y OeaddMid Frequent Holy Communion: Why? God’s Supreme Gift to Man By REV. JOHN A. O’BRIEN, Ph.D. The University of Notre Dame With the Decree on Daily Holy Communion T he greatest gift which a loving and merciful God has ever bestowed upon mankind is Jesus Christ. For Christ is God incarnate. His delight was to be with the children of men. That He might be with them always as their changeless Friend, their inspiring Counsellor, and their great High Priest, He instituted the sacrament of the Real Presence. In myriad tabernacles scattered among all the countries of the world, the Eucharistic Christ is dwelling among His people. Not only does He dwell among them, but He gives Himself to them for the nourishment of their souls. Jesus Christ, the Son of the Eternal Father, consubstantial with the Father, gives Himself, body and blood, soul and divinity, to mortal man in Holy Communion. Through a miracle of divine power, Jesus Christ gives Himself to us for Our Daily Bread. Here is divine omnipotence emptying itself in the frail bosom of humanity. Here is divine love ex- hausting itself in the heart of man. Stripping Him- self of the outward effulgence of the Godhead that He might not overawe man with His dazzling splen- dor, Jesus Christ comes under the lowly appear- ance of the Eucharistic Host to weak and mortal m man. Truly, this is God’s supreme gift to man. The mind reels and staggers in trying to conceive how even an infinite God could bestow upon man- kind a greater gift. The tremendous implications of this mighty truth are thus pointed out by Robert Browning; / say the acknowledgment of God in Christ Accepted by thy reason, solves for thee All questions in the world and out of it. Christ who cleansed the lepers, restored sight to the blind, healed the sick, pardoned sinners and died on Calvary’s Cross for the redemption of mankind is present in the Eucharist. When Christ appeared to His Apostles in the upper chamber after His resurrection, the doors and windows were closed. Yet Christ stood suddenly in their midst and spoke to them. In that same glorified body which tran- scends the properties of matter, Christ is present in the sacrament of His love. The real presence of Christ in the Eucharist stands, therefore, as an antidote for the vagueness of contemporary thought and as an anchor against the shifting currents of modern uncertainty and doubt. It takes God out of the mists of speculation and brings Him into our very midst to be our Coun- sellor, our Inspirer and our changeless Friend. In Holy Communion He comes to us as our heavenly manna, the bread of angels and the nutriment for our souls. All who hold steadfast to this central doctrine of historical Christianity will find in it an invincible armor against the assaults of modern un- belief. It is the soldier’s shield against danger and temptation. The Teaching of Christ Let us glance briefiy at the teaching of Christ on this subject. It is stated with great clearness in the [ 2 ] sixth chapter of the Gospel of St. John in the fol- lowing verses: “Amen, amen I say unto you : He that believeth in me, hath everlasting life. I am the bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna in the desert, and are dead. This is the bread which cometh down from heaven; that if any man eat of it, he may not die. I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever ; and the bread that I will give, is my flesh for the life of the world. The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying: How can this man give us his flesh to eat? Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say unto you: Except you eat of the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath everlasting life : and I will raise him up in the last day. “For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, abideth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father; so he that eateth me, the same also shall live by me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Not as your father did eat manna, and are dead. He that eateth this bread, shall live for ever. These things he said, teaching in the synagogue, in Caph- arnaum. Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it? . . . “After this many of his disciples went back ; and walked no more with Him. Then Jesus said to the twelve: Will you also go away? And Simon Peter answered him: Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life. And we have be- lieved and have known, that thou art the Christ, the Son of God.” [ 8 ] Christ fulfilled the promise to give them His fiesh to eat and His blood to drink at the Last Sup- per, the night before He died. St. Matthew thus records the fulfillment: “And while they were at supper, Jesus took bread, and blessed and broke and gave to His disciples and said : Take ye and eat. This is my body. And taking the chalice. He gave thanks and gave to them, saying : Drink ye -all of this; for this is my blood of the new testament, which shall be shed for many unto remission of sins.” With the words, “Do ye this in commemoration of me,” Christ authorized and commanded the Apostles and their successors to do the same as He had just done. St. Paul reflects this belief and prac- tice of the Church in the first century, which is the same as that of the Church in the twentieth cen- tury, when he writes to the Corinthians: “The chalice of benediction which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? and the bread which we break, is it not the partaking of the body of the Lord?” Such then is the clear teaching of Christ concerning the Holy Eucharist—^the Sacra- ment bringing to us His body and blood as our food and nourishment. Such is the belief of the Apostles and of all the members of the Church founded by Christ for more than nineteen hundred years. "The Word of Christ Is Sufficient . . /' One day a messenger, breathless with haste, burst in upon King Louis IX of France with sur- prising news. “Your Majesty,” he cried, “hasten to the Church! A great miracle is occuring there. A priest is saying Holy Mass, and after the conse- cration instead of the host there is visible on the altar Jesus Himself in His human figure. Everybody is marveling at it. Hurry before It disappears.” [ 4 ] To the astonishment of the messenger, the saintly monarch calmly replied: “Let them go to see that miracle who have any doubt regarding the real presence of our Lord in the Holy Sacrament. As for me, even if I saw Jesus on the altar in His visible form, and touched Him with my hand, and heard His voice, I should not be more convinced than I now am, that He is present in the consecrated Host. The word of Christ is sufficient for me. I need no miracle.” Such too should be the faith of every be- liever in Christ. For what greater credential can there be for any Christian than the word of Christ Himself? We come now to the question : What use are we making of the greatest gift within the power of an Omnipotent God to bestow upon mankind—the real presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist? We can avail ourselves of this divine benefaction by attend- ing Holy Mass and offering in union with the priest the Eucharistic Victim in atonement for our sins, by visiting our Eucharistic King in the tabernacles on our altars, and particularly by receiving our divine Lord in Holy Communion. No devotion is dearer to the Church than that of frequent, even daily Holy Communion. Our Holy Father, Pius XI, encouraged all the faithful to receive frequently this heavenly food. It offers the greatest assistance in living an upright and holy life, and constitutes our sure defense against all the temptations which assail us. Fruits of Sacrament The fruits of this sacrament are manifold. It deepens our sense of the reality of God, makes us conscious of His comradeship, enables us to perceive Him as the witness of our every deed, the auditor of our every word, the spectator of the thoughts and [ 6 ] aspirations which stir inarticulately in the silent kingdom of the soul. Closer is He than breathing, Nearer than hands or feet. It thus frees us from the tyranny of the senses with their dependence upon the visible, the tangible, the palpable. It helps us to realize that the most profound realties of life are those which are spirit- ual and lie beyond the reach of the senses. It en- ables us to understand what St. Paul meant when he said: “The things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are unseen are eternal.” It prompts us to exclaim with the holy souls of every age: “Ah! Christ, impalpable, I grasp Thee; inap- prehensible, I clutch Thee.” It delivers us from the narrow prison cell of time and place by making us one in spirit with the choice souls of every generation to whom the pres- ence of God is the most abiding reality in life. It enables us to break through the shell of external circumstance and grasp the kernel of spiritual re- ality which alone gives meaning and significance to human life. This sharpened perception of spiritual realities, this heightened sense of the presence of God constitutes the essential difference between the religious-minded person and the worlding. While making a pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1925, I chanced to pass through Smyrna in Asia Minor. It was shortly after the Turks had pil- laged and burned the city, and put hundreds to the sword. Still standing among the ruins was a con- vent. Among the nuns was one from Ireland. “Do you not feel lost,” I asked, “in this out-of-the-way corner of the world, so far from your home in Ire- land?” Pointing to the tabernacle she replied: [ 6 ] “Father, wherever the Blessed Sacrament is, there I am at home. For there is my Lord and my God.” How true that is! They are the words which every religious, priest, nun, or lay person can utter. How effectively does the Eucharistic Lord dispel the touch of nostalgia from the heart of the missionary arriving in a foreign land. For where our Lord and our God is, there can be no homesickness. For He is the essential element in every home. Hidden Source of Strength I have visited homes in Mexico where Sisters, wearing the dress of laywomen, were carrying on the work of Christian education in spite of the gov- ernment’s prohibition. No religious picture, image or symbol could be displayed. No tabernacle, no altar, no chapel was permitted. Yet in every such home, I would be led into a room where hidden away in a bureau, bookcase or other furniture was the Blessed Sacrament. There the Sisters repaired to draw strength and courage to continue their uphill fight against the systematic efforts of the revolu- tionary government to stamp out religion from the land. Take away their garb, their altar, their chapel, their crucifixes and all the external sym- bols of their faith, but leave them their Eucharistic Lord and King, and you will have left them all that matters. To that hidden place they go to give themselves Holy Communion, and thus to keep alive in the twentieth century the glorious traditions of the Church of the Catacombs. That which has kept the faith alive in Mexico, in spite of the savage perse- cution it has suffered, is the Holy Eucharist which has been kept in thousands of homes, barns and caves beyond the spying eyes of the minions of the gov- ernment. The gentle Christ Who said, “My delight [ 7 ] is to be with the children of men,” is fulfilling His promise and is providing the Catholics of Mexico in the hour of trial, with their hidden source of strength and courage. With their backs to the wall and their faces to the stars, the Eucharistic Christ will hearten them for the combat until they have shown once again to the world the futility of machine guns and firing squads to crush the naked human soul when steeled with a deathless faith. It is not only to missionaries in distant lands, and to Christians under the fire of persecution, how- ever, that the Holy Eucharist brings strength and intrepidity, but to all lonely and homesick souls. On the day I write these lines a student said to me: “Father, when I came to the University a few weeks ago, I was homesick and lonely. It is so large an in- stitution and it’s my first time away from home for any length of time. But after receiving Holy Com- munion all feelings of loneliness and homesickness vanished.” He little knew that he was but voicing the experience of every student and of every person away from the warmth of the family fireside and the loving atmosphere of home. It is the experience of every soldier and sailor as well. When Christ comes into our heart, there we are at home—in any city or in any land. Every one who has felt the warm intimacy of the love of Christ in frequent Holy Communion is able to make his own the words of a contemporary poet: Whoso has felt the Spirit of the Highest Cannot confound nor doubt Him nor deny: Yea with one voice, O world, tho’ thou deniest. Stand thou on that side, for on this am I. Another fruit of Holy Communion is the strength which it gives to resist temptation and to [ 8 ] break any habit of sin previously acquired. There are some who think that frequent Holy Communion should be the exclusive privilege of holy souls far removed from the dangers of sin. Yet the Sacred Congregation of the Council thought otherwise. For in its Decree on Daily Holy Communion the Council expressly declares: “The desire of Jesus Christ and of the Church that all the faithful should daily approach the sacred banquet is directed chiefly to this end, that the faith- ful, being united to God by means of the sacrament, may thence derive strength to resist their sensual passions, to cleanse themselves from the stains of daily faults, and to avoid those graver sins to which human frailty is liable ; so that the honor and rev- erence due to our Lord may be safeguarded, or that the Sacrament may serve as a reward of virtue be- stowed on the recipients. Hence the holy Council of Trent calls the Eucharist ‘the antidote whereby we are delivered from daily faults and preserved from deadly sins.’ ” It is therefore needed most of all by those who are weak and are struggling to break the manacles of a sinful habit. It is the supreme remedy against temptation and the most powerful influence in free- ing one from a vicious practice. There is no habit, no matter how strong the links in the chain of its practice, which can long resist the sledge hammer blows of this sacrament. The manacles of sensu- ality, intoxication, anger, jealousy, greed, all fall into smithereens before the devastating blows of this divine power. This truth is illustrated by an incident related by a missionary. As a result of a long life spent in ministering to the youth of Rome, this holy priest was wont to declare that frequent Holy Com- munion was not only the most eiiicacious means of [ 9 ] safeguarding virtue, but was also the only effective means of breaking the chains of certain habits of sensuality. One day a youth came to his confes- sional and said: “Father, I am bound hand and foot by the chain of a sensual habit which I have tried in vain to break. In spite of all my efforts to reform, I find myself falling again and again. I would do any- thing if I could but free myself from its galling tyranny which is making my life a living hell.” “Do you really wish to break yourself of this habit?” asked the confessor. “Father,” replied the youth, “give me any pen- ance and see if I will not gladly do it.” “All right, then,” said the priest, “I will give you an infallible remedy. You go to daily Holy Com- munion for a month. If you should be so unfortu- nate as to experience a single relapse, which may God avert, I ask you to rush immediately to con- fession, and then to Holy Communion.” This the youth did. At the end of the month he was able to say : “Father, for the first time in years I am able to draw the breath of a free man. Not only has daily Holy Communion freed me from this practice, but it has filled me with such a revulsion for that vice that I feel confident I will never again stoop to that degradation.” In the experience of that young man there is mirrored the experience of all mankind, young and old. So true is this that every confessor can say to any penitent groveling in the mire of sensuality, manacled by the chains of an oft-repeated act : “My friend, do you really wish to break this habit? Then if you do, you will go to daily Holy Com- munion until you have broken this habit. If you are not willing to do this, then you are making a mockery of the purpose of amendment. You are [ 10 ] lacking in determination and in sincerity.” It is high time for penitents to realize that purpose of amendment means more than a mere moving of the lips. It means the -whole-hearted utilization of a remedy of demonstrated effectiveness. In short, it means having recourse to daily Holy Communion. "But Now I Am Strong ..." . . During the persecution of the Roman Emperor Diocletian many Christians paid with their life for their faith in Christ. Among the number seized on one occasion were a father and his young son. Brought before the pagan tribunal, the Emperor commanded the father to offer incense to the gods of imperial Rome or pay the penalty with his life. “Rather than betray the Faith,” replied the father, “which has been purchased for me at the cost of the precious blood of Jesus Christ, I will die.” Whereupon he was cast into the arena and there before the howling savage mob he suffered the gladiator’s sword to sever his head from his body, thus sealing with his life’s blood his faith in the crucified Christ. As the son, a little boy of twelve witnessed the cruel death inflicted upon his father, he was over- come with horror. His face grew pale with fear. Tears filled his eyes. The Emperor, seeing the ter- ror-stricken condition of the boy, said: “You surely will not do such a foolish thing as your father. Come, offer incense to the gods of Rome, and I will not only spare thy life but will give thee anything thy youthful heart will ask.” The boy had taken a few steps toward the in- cense pyre when suddenly he stopped spellbound in his tracks. What was that voice he heard echoing in his inner ear? It was the voice of his martyred sire uttering his dying words. [ 11 ] Turning about, he walked quickly over to the spot in the arena where the sand was still crimson with the warm life-blood of his father. He stooped, and clenching it in his hand, said : “But a few moments ago I was weak and about to yield, but now I am strong with the blood of my father. Rather than deny the faith purchased for me by the blood of Jesus Christ and of my own mar- tyred father, I too will die,” With a smile lighting up his youthful counte- nance, and a prayer on his lips, he placed his head upon the swordsman’s block. As the head fell, severed from the body, the blood trickling down in the sand mingled with the warm lifeblood of his father. Devout Christians who stood near by saw in that union a reflection of that other union that took place beyond the skies, where father and son were clasped in the arms of the Master to receive from His hand the glorious crown of martyrdom. Those words of the martyred youth in ancient Rome are the words which every communicant can truthfully utter: “A little while ago,” he could say, “I was weak and about to yield. But now I am strong with the blood of my Father and my God, Rather than betray Him by the commission of a deliberate mortal sin, I too would be willing to die. For in Holy Communion we do not merely clench in our hands sand crimsoned with blood, but we re- ceive into our very hearts the body and blood, the soul and divinity of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, We become partakers of a divine life and secure a foretaste of that union with Christ in the beatiflc vision which constitutes the essential hap- piness of heaven, Notre Dame Men Testify While Notre Dame is famous throughout the land for her prowess on the gridiron, where her [121 stalwart sons are adding year after year new luster to the glorious tradition of Rockne, Gipp, Pilney and the other immortals, she has won still greater laurels in Catholic eyes for her marvelous success in draw- ing a vast army of her students to the daily Banquet Table. More than 1,600 daily crowd the altar rail- ings in the chapels of every hall on the campus. It is the most inspiring sight at Notre Dame. During the past fall the writer noticed among the hundreds of others a husky young student hob- bling to the altar rail, despite bruises and injuries which made the “going tough.” After football practice and scrimmaging, and injuries to boot, it would have been easy to sleep through till his eight o’clock class. But every morning found him at the rail. When the curtain fell upon another unbeaten team at Notre Dame, the name of this young gladi- ator was upon the rosters of All-Americans picked by the experts of the land. Who but God will ever know how much of that courage and strength he found at the Banquet Table of the Lord ? In response to the question. What does frequent Holy Communion mean to me? the students tell in their own words: 1 “I go to Holy Communion every day because I need God’s help in temptations and because I can do so much good for the Poor Souls. My Com- munions make me feel much nearer God and I can- not describe the wonderful feeling that comes over me.” “Frequent Communion gives, first, a peaceful conscience ; second, strength against temptation ; third, greater power of concentration in studies and in religion.” tl3] “If one starts frequent Communion it seems to me that he acquires a grace whereby he wishes to continue. If you miss, it seems one less chance to gain grace and do right.” 1 “Since I have begun the practice of daily Com- munion I find myself more careful in my speech. It makes me try to k.eep from mortal sin; it makes me receive the Holy Eucharist with more fervor; it makes it easier to approach the confessional.” Still More Fruits Among the other fruits of Holy Communion are an increase of sanctifying grace, the remission of venial sins, a strengthening of the will, an increased horror of sin and the remission of the temporal pun- ishment due to sin. Even mortal sin is washed from the soul of the person who, unmindful of such an offense, receives Holy Communion in good faith. This implies that the communicant have sorrow for all his sins and that if the mortal sin should later come to his mind, he will mention it in his next con- fession. The reason for this indirect remission of mortal sin through Holy Communion is to be found in the fact that it infuses sanctifying grace into the soul of the person who does not knowingly place an obstacle in the way. But sanctifying grace not only beautifies the soul, but also removes any sin, mortal or venial, that may be there. Hence, Holy Com- munion indirectly remits even mortal sin. Treating of the efficacy of the sacrament in strengthening the will to resist temptation, the Catechism of the Council of Trent says : “In the holy mysteries is, moreover, such efficacy as to preserve us pure and unhurt from sin and from the assault of temptations, and prepare the soul, as it were by [ 14 ] a heavenly medicine, against the easy approach and infection of virulent and deadly disease. ... It also restrains and represses the lust of the flesh; for whilst it inflames souls more with the Are of charity, it of necessity extinguishes the ardour of concu- piscence.” (Part ii. chap. 4, ques. 51.) St. Thomas Aquinas, the prince of the Church’s theologians, thus sums up the far-reaching effects of Holy Communion: “The Sacrament of the Body of the Lord puts the demons to flight, defends us against the incentives to vice and to concupiscence, cleanses the soul from sin, assuages the anger of God, enlightens the understanding to know God, in- flames the will and the affections with the love of God, Alls the memory with spiritual sweetness, con- firms the entire man in good, frees us from eternal death, multiplies the merits of a good life, leads us to our everlasting home, and reanimates the body to eternal life.” The person who is strengthened to resist tempta- tion is by that very fact heartened to fight more courageously for virtue, honor, right, manliness. One who knows he is free from sin and whose friend- ship with his Lord and Maker has been deepened and made more intimate through Holy Communion throws himself into his undertakings with greater courage and abandon. Knute Rockne's Story Knute Rockne, the famed coach at Notre Dame, tells of the deep impression made upon him by wit- nessing his players arise on the morning of a game and go off to receive Holy Communion. His observ- ant eye could not fail to notice the abandon with which such players threw themselves into the game and fought with the courage of untamed tigers. Here, in brief, is the way Rockne tells the story : “I used to be deeply impressed at the sight of my [ 16 ] players receiving Communion every morning, and finally I made it a point of going to Mass with them on the morning of a game. I realized that it ap- peared more or less incongruous, when we arrived in town for a game, for the general public to see my boys rushing off to church as soon as they got off the train, while their coach rode to the hotel and took his ease. So for the sake of appearances, if nothing else, I made it a point to go to church with the boys on the morning of a game. “One night before a big game in the East, I wS.s nervous and worried about the outcome of the game the next day and was unable to sleep. I tossed and rolled about the bed, and finally decided that I’d get up and dress, then go down to the lobby and sit in a chair alone with my thoughts. It must have been two or three o’clock in the morning when I arrived in the deserted lobby, so I took a chair and tried to get that football game off my mind by engaging some bellboys in conversatidn. “Along about five or six o’clock in the morning I started pacing the lobby of the hotel when suddenly I ran into two of my players hurrying out. I asked them where they were going at such an hour, al- though I had a good idea. “Then I retired to a chair in the corner of the lobby where I couldn’t be seen, but where I could see every one who went in or out of the door. With- in the next few minutes, my players kept hurrying out of the door in pairs and groups and finally when they were about all gone, I got over near the door so I could question the next player who came along. In a minute or two, the last members of the squad hur- ried out of an elevator and made for the door. I stopped them and asked them if they, too, were going to Mass, and they replied that they were. I decided to go along with them. 1161 “Although they probably didn’t realize it these youngsters were making a powerful impression on me with their piety and devotion, and when I saw all of them walking up to the Communion rail to re- ceive, and realized the several hours’ sleep they had sacrificed in order to do this, I understood for the first time what a powerful ally their religion was to those boys in their work on the football field. This was when I really began to see the light; to know what was missing in my life, and, later on, I had the great pleasure of being able to join my boys at the Communion rail.” Requirements for Daily Communion What are the requirements for daily Com- munion? In answer to this question, the Sacred Congregation of the Council decreed on December 16, 1905, as follows: “1. Frequent and daily Communion, as a thing most earnestly desired by Christ our Lord and by the Catholic Church, should be open to all the faith- ful, of whatever rank and condition of life; so that no one who is in the state of grace and who ap- proaches the holy table with a right and devout dis- position, can lawfully be hindered therefrom. “2. A right disposition consists in this : that he who approaches the holy table should do so, not out of routine, or vain glory, or human respect, but for the purpose of pleasing God, of being more closely united with Him by charity, and of seeking this Divine remedy for his weaknesses and de- fects.” From this it is evident that any person who is not certain that he is in the state of mortal sin, and who approaches the holy table for the purpose of nourishing his soul with this heavenly bread, is to be admitted to the sacrament. Mere scruples or [ 17 ] doubts are not sufficient to prohibit him. Nothing but the absolute certainty of mortal sin. Furthermore, it is not necessary for one to go to confession every time one wishes to receive. This would impose some inconvenience on a person and would doubtless deter a number. The Council is explicit in declaring that nothing need keep a person from approaching as often as he wishes, provided only that he is in the state of grace and has the proper disposition. By making daily Holy Com- munion so easily available, the Church shows her profound solicitude in having the faithful approach with the greatest frequency. "The Food of Life" Speaking at the National Eucharistic Congress at New Orleans, Archbishop Cicognani, Apostolic Delegate to the United States, declared: "We call ours a Christian civilization. Now Christian means followers of Christ, and the substance of Christian- ity is the life of Christ within us, in our thoughts and in our private and public actions. If such a life is lacking, there remains nothing of Christianity but the name; and this is left to us not as a glory but as a reproach. “Our altars are the center of this life—^the cen- ter for the priests who there offer the Eucharistic sacrifice, and there make known the word of God; the center for the faithful who gathering in the churches before the altar strengthen their souls at . the tabernacle. We must not think of the taber- nacle simply as a shrine to be visited, nor must we regard the Eucharist merely as a sacred symbol to be honored. It is a food to be received, it is the food of life, of the Christian life—^which therefore ought to be a Eucharistic life, and a Eucharistic life cannot be but an apostolate.” [ 18 ] After pointing out evils which distress him, the Holy Father in his radio address to the Congress said: “May we not discern, however, a promise of better things for the Universal Church in the re- flowering among you and among all peoples of Eucharistic love and the daily increase of ardent de- votion for the august Sacrament? , . . While we ex- hort you from our paternal heart to most holy zeal towards the Blessed Sacrament, we fervently pray with you that, strong in youth, your people, who stand forth in wealth and power, may also be a shining example of Catholic faith and Christian virtue.” Let us now consider some of the objections to frequent and daily Communion. “Unworthy to Receive” 1 do not consider myself worthy to re- ceive Holy Communion often. This objection is based upon a misconception of the primary purpose of Holy Communion. It is not so much a reward for virtue as it is an antidote for sin. “If you are not worthy to communicate every day,” asks St. Ambrose, “are you more worthy after abstaining a year from Communion?”^ The very fact that you feel yourself weak and easily drawn into sin is the very reason why you should receive often. The Church bids you to repeat with the priest before Communion the humble acknowledgement: “Lord, I am not worthy.” The longer you abstain from this heavenly food the less worthy do you be- come to receive, since it is, as the Council of Trent points out, “the antidote whereby we are delivered from daily faults and preserved from deadly sin.” 1 De Sacramentia, lib. V. C. IV. [ 19 ] Paderewski tells us that when he failed to prac- tice on his piano for a single day, he would notice the difference in his playing. V^Hien he remained away two days, his wife could notice the difference, three days, his friends could observe it, and when he remained away four days, the whole audience could notice the difference. So too it is with those who are accustomed to keep not their fingers but their hearts and consciences sensitive to the music of divine grace and the warmth of divine love by daily Holy Communion. Each day’s abstention leaves its perceptible effect in dulling the sensi- tivity of the conscience to the music of divine in- spiration and in blunting the delicacy of the love for the Eucharistic Lord. Mechanical Routine I am afraid of losing my respect and de- votion for Holy Communion by too great familiarity. The reception will become too much of a mechanical routine. Loss of devotion will result from improper preparation. But if one prepares devoutly for Holy Communion, frequent reception will deepen the sen- timents of reverence and love. Familiarity in the sense of intimacy and union with Christ is not to be deprecated but is the object of all prayer and spir- itual exercise. In regard to routine, two kinds are to be distinguished. There is the routine objected to in Rule 2 of the Decree on Daily Holy Com- munion. This is the purely mechanical reception of the Sacrament with an attitude of irreverence or at least of indifference, in short, with an absence of “a right and devout disposition.” This attitude is the very opposite of the one engendered by frequent [ 20 ] Communion when care is taken to prepare properly for this great act by the arousal of sentiments of reverence and love. “They that eat me, shall yet hunger, and they that drink me, shall yet thirst.” This saying of Ecclesiasticus reflects the experience of every devout recipient of frequent Communion. The second kind of routine is that which is synonymous with habit. In this sense routine in- dicates a facility of action which is most desirable in regard to all virtuous deeds. Thus it is emi- nently desirable to make the daily recitation of one’s morning and evening prayers a matter of routine or habit. Hence too it is most desirable to make the devout reception of daily Holy Communion a matter of habitual practice instead of being dependent upon whim or caprice. The whole aim of the spiritual life is to render the performance of virtuous actions a matter of routine or habit. "Nof Without Confession" I don't like going to Communion without confession and I don't have either the time or the opportunity to go to confession each day. The Church teaches that one may receive Holy Communion repeatedly without going to confession, provided of course one is not conscious of any mor- tal sin. Why then should you insert an action not required by the Pope? The Decree on Daily Com- munion explicitly states that only two conditions are requisite, namely, the “state of grace” and “a right and devout intention.” It is not the mark of a good Catholic to be more exacting than the Pope. Consequently, one may go to Communion for sev- eral weeks if he desires on the one confession. [M] "Inappropriate For Men" Frequent Holy Communion is all right for women and children, hut it is some- what inappropriate for men. With God there is no double standard of morality or piety, one for women and another for men. Prayer and the sacraments are the means of grace alike for men, women and children. Because men are frequently more exposed to temptation than women, there is a correspondingly greater need for this divine antidote to sin. It is a complete mis- conception of the purpose for which Christ insti- tuted the Holy Eucharist to think that it was meant chiefly for women and children. It is meant for all and especially for those who are exposed to danger. It is their best fortification. The martyrs who walked out into the arena of the Roman ampitheater to face the gladiator’s sword or the savage lions found in the devout reception of the Holy Eucharist the strength which sustained them for their ordeal without faltering. “The strongest among the pure,’’ said Jean Paul Richter, “and the purest among the strong, Christ with His wounded hands lifted empires from their hinges and changed the stream of centuries.’’ He who bows his head in the frequent reception of this divine manna, becomes the strongest, the most manly and the most courageous among men. When Frederick B. Snite, Jr., was stricken with infantile paralysis while traveling in China, the doctors gave him about a week to live. Years have now elapsed and he is still alive and apparently winning his battle against the dread disease. True, his parents with princely generosity and a devotion that has never faltered, have provided him with every help known to medical science. But this does not explain the secret of his indomitable courage, his [221 buoyancy and his unfailing cheerfulness. If you ask him, he will tell you that it is the Eucharistic food which comes to him each day. After the malady had paralyzed the muscles used in breathing, it then rendered him unable to utter a single word. The walls of the iron lung closed in upon him, leaving only his head free. Un- able to move, unable to breathe by himself, unable to speak. What a plight! Yet in this awful crisis the priest brought to him each day a hidden source of strength and courage. After months elapsed, his father disclosed to me when I visited his son, he regained the power to utter a single word barely audible to those standing near him. It was the single word “God !”—the first word he uttered upon emerg- ing from that breathless and speechless world in which he had been so long imprisoned. Slowly he regained a little more strength and became able to say a whole phrase. When the priest one morning held aloft the Eucharistic host, prepara- tory to giving him Holy Communion, there came from his lips as he gazed at his Eucharistic Lord the scarcely audible ejaculation, “0 God! How I thank Thee for this Gift!” Truly is the Holy Eucharist the source of courage, of strength, of manliness. It is the Bread of Angels and the food of heroes. "Don't Have Time" I do not have sufficient time for proper preparation for Holy Communion nor for the thanksgiving afterwards. Hence, I cannot receive often. True, there should be due preparation. But does this mean the recitation of many prayers, the per- formance of many devotional exercises? Not at all. The best preparation for Communion is a good life [ 23 ] and the sanctifying of one’s ordinary daily actions. Moreover, “frequent Communion is the best prepa- ration for Communion,” says a Lapide. “One Com- munion is thanksgiving for another; and the Com- munion of today is the best preparation for the Communion of .tomorrow.” “Therefore,” says St. Alphonsus Liguori, “if you have not time to prepare yourself, in consequence of some good work or some duty of your state, do not abstain from Communion on that account. Only take care to avoid useless conversations and occupations that are not urgent.” If one is hurried, it will still be possible to make the immediate preparation while going to the Church, and to continue the thanksgiving on the way home. There are two axioms which apply here, namely, “Where there is a will, there is a way,” and “Love will find a way.” The individual who has once experienced the warmth and intimacy of daily union with Christ in Holy Communion will laugh at the trivial excuses which deter the faint-hearted and the indifferent. "Can't Keep It Up" Why should I start the practice of daily Communion when I know that I shall not be able to keep it up? Because a half a loaf is better than none at all. Even if the practice cannot be continued when one leaves school, or moves to a different location, it will nevertheless be a matter of supreme importance to have fortified one’s character and deepened one’s virtue and piety by having received frequently for even a limited period. The fact is that young people during the plastic days of their youth stand in need of greater spiritual reinforcements than they will after their characters are formed. During ado- [241 lescence new passions are awakening within them. Their experience is very limited and offers but little help in restraining the forces striving for the mas- tery. During this crucial period when youth is sculpturing his character for weal or for woe, it is an immense advantage to form the habit of frequent Communion so that he will have the most powerful ally in the world on his side. There can be no doubt of the successful outcome if youth will employ the most effective antidote for the temptations that press round about him on every side. The habit of frequent Communion will tide him over the critical years of adolesence and plant so deeply in his young soul the seeds of piety and vir- tue that the after years will bring an abundant harvest. Daily Holy Communion for the youth of every school and college in our land is the ideal placed before us by the Sovereign Pontiff. A min- istry of more than a quarter of a century among students at Illinois and at Notre Dame has crystal- lized in me the unshakeable conviction that the for- mation of such a habit is the best guarantee of their enduring faith and character and the most valuable contribution we can render to them. "Christ Knocks, But You Must Open" In the chapel of Keble College, Oxford, there hangs the famous masterpiece, The Light of the World, by Holman Hunt. It depicts the Master standing and knocking at a door upon which vines are growing. The hinges are rusty from long dis- use. In His hand He holds a lantern. “Behold!” He is saying, “I stand at the door, and knock.” When Hunt had finished his painting, he invited his fellow artists to inspect it. They viewed it care- fully from this angle and from that. Loud were they in their praise. [ 26 ] “It is a masterpiece of all time,” they said. “But,” said one of them, “you have forgotten one thing.” “What is that?” asked Hunt. “You have forgotten to place a knob on the door.” “No,” said Hunt, “I have not forgotten it. I have omitted it purposely. For that is the door of the human heart and it opens only from within.” Christ may knock. Christ may plead. But it is only we who can admit Him. Christ is standing today before the door of every human heart, plead- ing for admittance in the Sacrament of His Love. Will you not open it each day and let Him in? If Catholics but understood how easy and sim- ple it is to receive Holy Communion frequently, even daily, and how fruitful is this practice, the number of frequent communicants would grow by leaps and bounds. Certainly, weekly reception is most easy. We all are obliged to hear Mass on Sun- day. Why not arise, at the Communion time and walk up to the railing and receive the Source of all goodness and the Author of all holiness? Why not thus receive the maximum fruit of the Eucharistic Sacrifice? Will you not, dear reader, put aside all vacilla- tion and hesitancy and do your part through fre- quent Communion in bringing about that Eucharistic renaissance which means so much for the happiness of the individual and the peace and welfare of the world? Let us show the world once and for all by the eloquence of our actions that we believe with a profound and deathless faith the words of our divine Master, Jesus Christ: “My flesh is meat in- deed; and my blood is drink indeed. . . . He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath ever- lasting life : and I will raise him up on the last day.” [S«] APPENDIX Decree of the Sacred Congregation of the Council on Receiving Daily the Most Holy Eucharist December 20, 1905 1. The Council of Trent, having in view the unspeak- able treasures of grace which are offered to the faithful who receive the Most Holy Eucharist, makes the following decla- ration: ‘‘The holy Synod would desire that at every Mass the faithful who are present should communicate, not only spir- itually, by way of internal affection, but sacramentally, by the actual reception of the Eucharist.” ^ Which words de- clare plainly enough the wish of the Church that all Chris- tians should be daily nourished by this heavenly banquet and should derive therefrom abundant fruit for their sanctifi- cation. 2. And this wish of the Council is in entire agreement with that desire wherewith Christ our Lord was inflamed when He instituted this Divine Sacrament. For He Himself more than once, and in no ambiguous terms, pointed out the necessity of eating His Flesh and drinking His Blood, espe- cially in these words: “This is the bread that cometh down from heaven; not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth this bread shall live for ever.” 2 Now, from this comparison of the food of angels with bread and with the manna, it was easily to be understood by His dis- ciples that, as the body is daily nourished with bread, and as the Hebrews were daily nourished with manna in the desert, so the Christian soul might daily partake of this heavenly bread, and be refreshed thereby. Moreover, whereas in the Lord’s Prayer we are bidden to ask for “our daily bread,” the holy Fathers of the Church all but unanimously teach that by these words must be understood, not so much that material bread which is the support of the body as the Eucharistic bread which ought to be our daily food. 3. Moreover, the desire of Jesus Christ and of the Church that all the faithful should daily approach the sacred ban- 1 Sesa. XXII, cap. vi. [ 27 ] 2 John vi. 69. quet is directed chiefly to this end, that the faithful, being united to God by means of the Sacrament, may thence derive strength to resist their sensual passions, to cleanse them- selves from the stains of daily faults, and to avoid those graver sins to which human frailty is liable; so that its pri- mary purpose is not that the honor and reverence due to our Lord may be safeguarded, or that the Sacrament may serve as a reward of virtue bestowed on the recipients. Hence the holy Council of Trent calls the Eucharist “the antidote where- by we are delivered from daily faults and preserved from deadly sins.” ® 4. This desire on the part of God was so well understood by the first Christians that they daily flocked to the holy table as to a source of life and strength. “They were per- severing in the doctrine of the Apostles, and in the com- munication of the breaking of bread.” ^ And that this practice was continued into later ages, not without great fruit of holiness and perfection, the holy Fathers and ecclesiasti- cal writers bear witness. 5. But when in later times piety grew cold, and more especially under the influence of the plague of Jansenism, disputes then began to arise concerning the dispositions with which it was proper to receive Communion frequently or daily; and writers vied with one another in imposing more and more stringent conditions as necessary to be fulfilled. The result of such disputes was that very few were consid- ered worthy to communicate daily, and to derive from this most healing Sacrament its more abundant fruits, the rest being content to partake of it once a year, or once a month, or at the utmost weekly. Nay, to such a pitch was rigorism carried that whole classes of persons were excluded from a frequent approach to the holy table; for instance, those who were engaged in trade, or even those who were living in the state of matrimony, 6. Others, however, went to the opposite extreme. Under the persuasion that daily Communion was a divine precept, and in order that no day might pass without the reception of the Sacrament, besides other practices contrary to the ap- proved usage of the Church, they held that the Holy Eucha- rist ought to be received, and in fact administered it, even on Good Friday. Under these circumstances the Holy See did not fail in 8 Sess. XIII, cap. ii. [ 28 ] 4 Acts ii. 42. its duty of vigilance, for by a decree of this Sacred Congre- gation, which begins with the words Cum ad aures, issued on February 12, A. D. 1679, with the approbation of Innocent XI, it condemned these errors, and put a stop to such abuses, at the same time declaring that all the faithful of whatso- ever class—merchants or married persons not at all excepted —might be admitted to frequent Communion, according to the devotion of each one and the judgment of his confessor. And on December 7, 1690, by the decree of Pope Alexander VIII, Sanctissimus Dominus, the proposition of Baius, postu- lating a perfectly pure love of God, without any admixture, or defect, as requisite on the part of those who wished to approach the holy table, was condemned. 7. Yet the poison of Jansenism, which, under the pretext of showing due honor and reverence to the Holy Eucharist, had infected the minds even of good men, did not entirely dis- appear. The controversy as to the dispositions requisite for the lawful and laudable frequentation of the Sacrament sur- vived the declarations of the Holy See; so much so, indeed, that certain theologians of good repute judged that daily Communion should be allowed to the faithful only in rare cases, and under many conditions. 8. On the other hand, there were not wanting men of learning and piety who more readily granted permission for this practice, so salutary and so pleasing to God. In accord- ance with the teaching of the Fathers, they maintained that there was no precept of the Church which prescribed more perfect dispositions in the case of daily than of weekly or monthly Communion; while the good effects of daily Com- munion would, they alleged, be far more abundant than those of Communion received weekly or monthly. 9. In our own day the controversy has been carried on with increased warmth, and not without bitterness, so that the minds of confessors and the consciences of the faithful have been disturbed, to the no small detriment of Christian piety and devotion. Accordingly, certain distinguished men, themselves pastors of souls, have urgently besought His Holi- ness Pope Pius X to deign to settle, by his supreme author- ity, the question concerning the dispositions requisite for daily Communion; so that this usuage, so salutary and so pleasing to God, might not only suffer no decrease among the faithful, but might rather be promoted and everywhere propagated—a thing most desirable in these days, when re- ligion and the Catholic faith are attacked on all sides, and [ 29 ] the true love of God and genuine piety are so lacking in many quarters. And His Holiness, being most earnestly desirous, out of his abundant solicitude and zeal, that the faithful should be invited to partake of the sacred banquet as often as possible, and even daily, and should profit to the utmost by its fruits, committed the aforesaid question to this Sacred Congregation, to be looked into and decided once for all. 10. Accordingly, the Sacred Congregation of the Coun- cil, in a Plenary Session held on December 16, 1905, submitted this matter to a very careful scrutiny; and, after sedulously examining the reason adduced on either side, determined and declared as follows: (1) Frequent and daily Communion, as a thing most earnestly desired by Christ our Lord and by the Catholic Church, should be open to all the faithful, of whatever rank and condition of life; so that no one who is in the state of grace, and who approaches the holy table with a right and devout disposition, can lawfully be hindered therefrom. (2) A right disposition consists in this: that he who approaches the holy table should do so, not out of routine, or vain-glory, or human respect, but for the purpose of pleas- ing God, of being more closely united with Him by charity, and of seeking this Divine remedy for his weaknesses and defects. (3) Although it is most expedient that those who com- municate frequently or daily should be free from venial sins, at least from such as are fully deliberate, and from any af- fection thereto, nevertheless, it is sufficient that they be free from mortal sin, with the purpose of never sinning in future; and if they have this sincere purpose, it is impossible but that daily communicants should gradually emancipate them- selves even from venial sins, and from all affection thereto. (4) But whereas the Sacraments of the New Law, though they take effect ex opere operato, nevertheless pro- duce a greater effect in proportion as the dispositions of the recipient are better, therefore care is to be taken that Holy Communion be preceeded by careful preparation, and followed by a suitable thanksgiving, according to each one’s strength, circumstances and duties. (5) That the practice of frequent and daily Communion may be carried out with greater prudence and more abun- dant merit, the confessor’s advice should be asked. Confes- sors, however, are to be careful not to dissuade any one from [30] frequent and daily Communion, provided that he is in a state of grace and approaches with a right disposition. (6) But since it is plain that by the frequent or daily reception of the Holy Eucharist union with Christ is fos- tered, the spiritual life abundantly sustained, the soul more richly endowed with virtues, and an even surer pledge of everlasting happiness bestowed on the recipient, therefore parish priests, confessors and preachers—in accordance with the approved teaching of the Koman Catechism ®—are fre- quently, and with great zeal, to exhort the faithful to this devout and salutary practice. (7) Frequent and daily Communion is to be promoted especially in religious Orders and Congregations of all kinds ; with regard to which, however, the decree Queviadmodum, issued on December 17, 1890, by the Sacred Congregation of Bishops and Regulars, is to remain in force. It is also to be promoted especially in ecclesiastical seminaries, where stu- dents are preparing for the service of the altar ; as also in all Christian establishments, of whatever kind, for the training of youth. (8) In the case of religious institutes, whether of solemn or simple vows, in whose rules, or constitutions, or calendars Communion is assigned to certain fixed days, such regula- tions are to be regarded as directive and not preceptive. In such cases the appointed number of Communions should be regarded as a minimum, and not as setting a limit to the devotion of the religious. Therefore, access to the Eucha- ristic table, whether more frequently or daily, must always be open to them, according to the principles above laid down in this Decree. And in order that all religious of both sexes may clearly understand the provisions of this Decree, the Superior of each house is to see that it is read in community, in the vernacular, every year within the octave of the Feast of Corpus Christi. (9) Finally, after the publication of this Decree, all ecclesiastical writers are to cease from contentious contro- versies concerning the dispositions requisite for frequent and daily Communion. All this having been reported to His Holiness Pope Pius X by the undersigned Secretary of the Sacred Congregation in an audience held on December 17, 1905, His Holiness rati- fied and confirmed the present Decree, and ordered it to be 6 Part II, cap. iv., quest. 68. [ 31 ] published, anything to the contrary notwithstanding. He further ordered that it should be sent to all local ordinaries and regular prelates, to be communicated by them to their respective seminaries, parishes, religious institutes, and priests, and that in their reports concerning the state of their respective dioceses or institutes they should inform the Holy See concerning the execution of the matters therein deter- mined. Given at Rome, the 20th day of December, 1905. VINCENT, Card. Bishop of Palestrina, Prefect. Cajetan De Lai, Secretary. L. m S. ? SpS the RiAPlko OF THIS I 0 X