W , 8 1946 THE CATHOLIC HOUR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY THOMAS H. MAHONY The sixteenth in a series of addresses by prominent Catholic laymen entitled ‘‘THE ROAD AHEAD/^ delivered in the Catholic Hour, broad- cast by the National Broadcasting Company in cooperation with the National Council of Catholic Men, on September 22, 1946, by Thomas H. Mahony, of Boston, Massachusetts, outstanding authority on inter- national affairs. After the series has been concluded on the radio, it will be made available in one pamphlet. National Council of Catholic Men Washington, D. C. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS The Declaration of Indepen- dence of 17.76 asserts /That all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Lib- erty, and the pursuit of Happi- ness. . . In the preamble to a ''State- ment of Essential Human Rights,’' prepared by an inter- national group of jurists select- ed in 1943 by the American Law Institute, it was stated that, "Upon the freedom of the in- dividual depends the welfare of the people, the safety of the state and the peace of the world.” It is more and more apparent every day that human rights and their protection are of para- mount importance in a peaceful post-war world. The phrase "human rights” as thus used may be described as those fundamental rights of the individual which, by reason of their origin and the purpose of their exercise, antedate in point of time and validity, and trans- cend any governmental author- ity. They are not given by any political society—they are God given. They cannot be surrend- ered to or destroyed or trans- Preamble of Statement—infra. grossed by any nation—they are unalienable. . These unalienable and funda- mental rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and those rights which are incidental thereto are sometimes classified as basic (the right to life), civil (the right to due process of law, etc.), political (the right to the ballot, etc.) economic and social (the right to social security, etc.) and scientific (the right to free- dom of scientific inquiry and in- formation). The committee of jurists, re- ferred to earlier, composed of members from many nations list- ed in their "Statement of Essen- tial Human Rights,’”^ the follow- ing rights and freedoms: 1. "Freedom of belief and of worship. . .” 2. "Freedom to form and hold opinions. . .” 3. "Freedom of expres- sion. . .” 4. "Freedom of assembly. . .” 5. "Freedom to form . . , as- sociations of a political, eco- nomic, religious, social, cultural, or any other character for pur- poses not inconsistent with these articles. . .” Am. Law Inst. Com.—Annals of Am. Acadm. Pol. and Social Sc., Jan., ’46, pp. 18-26. 6. ''Freedom from unreason- able interference with his per- son, home, reputation, privacy, activities and property. . 7. . , the right to have his criminal and civil liabilities de- termined without undue delay by fair public trial by a competent tribunal before which he has had opportunity for a full hear- ing. . 8. ". . . the right to immedi- ate judicial determination of the legality of his detention. . 9. The right not to be "con- victed of crime except for vio- lation of a law in effect at the time of the commission of the act charged. . 10. ". . . the right to own property. . 11. . . the right to edu- cation. . 12. "...the r i g h t t o work. . r 13. ". . . the right to reason- able conditions of work. . 14. ". . . the right to ade- quate food and housing. . 15. ". . . the right to social security. '. 16. ". . . the right to take part in the government. . 17. ". . . the right to protec- tion against arbitrary discrimi- nation in the provisions and ap- plication of the law because of race, religion, sex or any other reason/' 18. "In the exercise of his rights every one is limited by the rights of others and by the just requirements of the democratic state." The Inter-American Judicial Committee late in 1945 published a "Draft Declaration of the In- ternational Rights and Duties of Man""^ in which substantially those same rights were included. Certain additional or rather more specific rights were includ- ed. Among these were the fol- lowing : . . . the right ... to petition the government for redress of grievances or . . . in respect to any other matter of public or private interest. . ". . . the right to a nation- ality. . . " . . the right to be free from interference in his family re- lations." ". . , the right to share in the ^benefits accruing from the dis- coveries and inventions of science. . ." More recently the Committee on Human Rights of the Com- mittee to Study the Organization of Peace issued a proposed Inter- national Bill of Rights contain- ing substantially the same sug- gested rights. The United Nations Charter * Ibid.—Pan. Am. Union, March, 1946—pp, 5> 7> 9. pledges the member nations to promote ^'universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms.” It does not, however, confer any power upon the United Nations, as an organization, to enforce observance of these rights or freedoms. The Charter further provides for the establishment of a Com- mission on Human Rights with power to recommend to the Eco- nomic and Social Council or the General Assembly the formula- tion of an international bill of rights. The question of whether these rights will be observed and, if so, how and to what extent observance will be enforced, is still to be determined by the indi- vidual nations. The failure or refusal of any nation to recog- nize or to enforce such rights does not lay it open to any penalty or punishment. The Inter-American Juridical* Committee suggested the adop- tion of its Declaration by every nation as part of its domestic law. It also suggested that in the case of decisions against aliens resident in a country other than their own the national state of the alien should have the right to appeal to an international court for a review of the adverse decision. One of the delegates to the present peace conference at Paris recently suggested that there be written into the peace treaties, in addition to a coven- ant to recognize and to protect' fundamental personal rights, a provision for the establishment of a European Court of Human Rights with original jurisdiction, and appellate jurisdiction over national courts, in all matters involving such personal rights. This suggestion has not yet been adopted. There is, therefore, at the present time, no means whereby any nation can be compelled to recognize these funda:mental human rights, or to adopt them as a bill of rights or to enforce them, if that nation refuses to do so. There is no international or world authority with any such power of enforcement, The United Nations has no present authority to enact or to adopt and enforce an international bill of human rights. So, too, there is no inter- national or world authority, with power to enforce the fundamen- tal rights of States. The United Nations has no such present au- thority. The exercise of a veto in the Security Council by any of the Great Powers prevents any imposition of any sanctions against any violating State. The recognition of these fundamental human rights and the protection of t-hem is the mark of a political democracy. Lincoln defined political demo- cracy as ‘‘government of the people, by the people, for the people,” and no better definition has since been found. Of recent years the particular form of government has meant little with reference to political democracy. Of two monarchies, one may be a political democracy and the other a totalitarian dic- tatorship. Of two republics one may be politically democratic and the other authoritarian, maintained by a secret police. There are certain minimum re- quirements for political demo- cracy. If a national government possesses them it is politically democratic and if not, it is not, whatever its form may be. There should be a representative legis- lative body, elected periodically, reflecting current popular will. The elections should be by secret ballot, fairly conducted and upon a franchise broad enough to ex- press majority popular will. Po- litical parties should be free to participate in such elections; to offer candidates and platforms and to campaign for them. There should be a judiciary which functions to administer justice independently of any interfer- ence by legislative or executive agencies. No government which seeks to perpetuate itself or its leaders in power by refusing to recognize these fundamental re- quirements or to apply these principles can properly be called a political democracy. Unless these rights are recog- nized and protected throughout the world it is certain that there will be countries where political freedom and economic freedom do not exist. Such areas are the breeding places of discontent, friction and war. In addition to these funda- mental human rights, however, there are also certain fundamtal rights possessed by nation states. The Inter-American Juridical Committee some time ago issued a proposed declaration of such rights based upon principles adopted at various Pan-Amer- ican Conferences. Among those rights they included the follow- ing: “The right to respect for its personality, sovereignty and in- dependenoe.” “The right to judical equality with all other states.” It has also been asserted that states have or should have the right to equitable revision of burdensome treaties, to free ac- cess to necessary raw materials and to free economic intercourse with the people of all other nations. The failure to recognize and to respect such fundamental rights of States has frequently led to war and may do so again in the future. Pope Pius XII has made it clear . in his recent encyclicals and messages that these human rights and state rights must be recognized and sustained if world peace and world order are to be maintained. He points the way in challenging words. In his Christmas message of 1943 dealing with the State as a unit of human society, Pius XII pointed out man’s fundamental rights saying : ‘‘He who would have the star of peace shine out and stand over society should cooperate for his part in giving back to the human person the dignity given to it by God from the very begin- nings. . . “He should uphold respect for the practical realization of the following fundamental personal rights : “the right to maintain and de- velop one’s corporal, intellectual and moral life and especially the right to religious formation and education ; “the right to worship God in private and public and to carry on religious works of charity; “the right to marry and achieve the aim of married life; “the right to conjugal and do- mestic society ; “the right to work as the in- dispensable means toward the maintenance of family life; “the right to free choice of a state in life, and hence, too, of the priesthood or religious life; “the right to the use of ma- terial goods, in keeping with one’s duties and social limi- tations.” In his Christmas message of 1939, Pius XII, in discussing the rights of States, said : “A fundamental condition for a just and hondrable peace is to assure to every nation, large or small, powerful or weak, its right to life and independence. One nation’s will to live must nevei be tantamount to a death sen- tence for another. . .” In his Christmas message of 1940 he again referred to this matter, and asserted as one of the indispensable prerequisites for a peaceful world: “Triumph over those germs of conflict which consist in exces- sive disparities between nations in the field of world economy; hence progressive action, secured by appropriate guarantees, to arrive at some orderly arrange- ment which would give to every state the means of securing for its citizens of all classes a proper standard of living/' In his Christmas message .of 1941 the Pope again emphasizes this point saying: '‘Within the limits of a new order founded on moral princi- ples there is no room for the violation of the freedom, integ- rity and security of other States, no matter what may be their territorial expansion, or their capacity for defense. If it is in- evitable that the powerful states should, by reason of their great- er potentialities and their power play leading roles in the for- mation of economic groups com- prising not only themselves but also smaller and weaker states, it is nevertheless indispensable that in the interest of the com- mon good they, like all others, respect the rights of those smaller states to political free- dom, to economic development, and to adequate protection in case of conflicts between nations, of that neutrality which is theirs according to the natural as well as international law. . THE CATHOLIC HOUR 1930—Seventeenth Year—-1946 The nationwide Catholic Hour was inaugurated on March 2, 1930, by the National Council of Catholic Men in cooperation with the National Broadcasting Company and its associated stations. Radio facilities are provided by NBC and the stations associated with it; the pro- gram is arranged and produced by NCCM. The Catholic Hour was begun on a network of 22 stations, and now carries its message of Catholic truth on each Sunday of the year through a number of sta- tions varying from 90 to 110, situated in 40 states, the District of Columbia, and Hawaii. Consisting usually of an address, mainly expository, by one or another of America's leading Catholic preachers—^though some- times of talks by laymen, sometimes of dramatizations —and of sacred music provided by a volunteer choir, the Catholic Hour has distinguished itself as one of the most popular and extensive religious broadcasts in the world. An average of 100,000 audience letters a year, about twenty per cent of 'which come from listeners of other faiths, gives some indication of its popularity and influence. Our Sunday Visitor Press Huntington, Indiana