Nlod»c-Ojr\ CourvcJ l C Isd VATICAN II Digitized by the Internet Archive in ?nifi https://archive.org/details/decreeonecumenisvati VATICAN 11 DECREE ON ECUMENISM —with introductory preface and discussion questions— COPYRIGHT, 1966 NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CATHOLIC MEN NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CATHOLIC WOMEN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PORTION OF THIS BOOKLET MAY BE REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CATHOLIC MEN AND THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CATHOLIC WOMEN 1312 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20005 FOREWORD The great hope of the Council Fathers gathered in Rome for Vatican II was that out of their hours, day and years of work would come enduring and relevant charters for world-wide action. Of the 16 documents prepared and passed by the Council and promulgated by the Pope, perhaps none is more a mandate for such positive action than the Decree On Ecumenism , reprinted here in its entirety. Yet before anyone can commit himself to the kind of dedicated program of action called for by the Council, he or she must undergo a “conversion.” A conversion to ecumenism generates conviction that there is a need for eumenical action, that there are real benefits to be gained from such action, that the time is ripe to begin such action. All these effects are implied in the word “decisive”; the Decree On Ecumenism is just that. Because it is a decisive document, the Decree requires and deserves careful study by Catholics and all other persons interested in the dynamic interaction of the Church and the world. In order to facilitate such study and to stimulate individual thinking about the divisions among Christians, this pamphlet includes an interpretive preface to the Decree and an appendix of discussion questions. The preface seeks to amplify the essential concepts of the Decree , explore its implications and relate it to the more general declarations of the Constitution On the Church. While a private reading of the Decree will prove profitable to anyone, it is recommended that it be studied in a group (preferably of mixed religious back- ground). The merit of this technique is obvious and the method is simple: each of the participants in turn reads a paragraph of the Decree aloud while the others follow in the text. At the completion of the text, the appended questions (and any others that may arise) can be discussed freely and con- versationally. This form of group reading is itself an ecumenical activity; it is to be hoped that it will be the first of many to the mutual enrichment of Christians. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We gratefully acknowledge the generous as- sistance and advice accorded us in the preparation of this program by members of Catholic, Protestant and Jewish ecumenical bodies. We wish especially to thank representatives of the Bishops’ Commis- sion for Ecumenical Affairs, NCWC, Washington, D.C. PREFACE On November 21, 1964, the Second Vatican Council put forth before the world, by proclamation of Pope Paul VI, a Decree on Ecumenism. It is a brief document, by comparison with other Council declarations, but it is one of the most potent of all the sixteen great charters forged at Vatican II. The decree is, in large part, the Council’s fulfillment of Pope John’s promise that, for the future, friendship and openness would characterize the Catholic Church’s approach to the rest of the Christian community. As the late Pope said in an address to a group of Protestant ministers: “We do not wish to put anyone in history on trial. We shall not seek to establish who was right and who was wrong. Responsibility is divided. We only wish to say: let us come together, let us make an end to our divisions.” This appeal surpasses all prior expressions of regret and hope for reunion by the Holy See, and supplants them with a new note of real hope. That note lies in the notion that accusation, recrimination, blame, guilt, etc., have no place in the vocabulary of ecumenism; that fault-finding is as useless and destructive to the Christian family as to the private family. The decree echoes the true seriousness of Pope John’s effort to begin the work of reconciliation. Addressing itself to the Catholic faithful, it affirms that, for Catholics: “Their primary duty is to make a careful and honest appraisal of whatever needs to be done or renewed in the Catholic household itself, in order that its life may bear wit- ness. . . And further: “It is right and salutary to recognize the riches of Christ and virtuous works in the lives of others who are bearing wit- ness to Christ, sometimes even to the shedding of their blood. . . . nor should we forget that anything wrought by the grace of the Holy Spirit in the hearts of our separated brethren can be a help to our own edi- fication.” i The Decree itself, reprinted here in its entirety, consists of an in- troduction and three chapters: "Catholic Principles of Ecumenism,” “The Practice of Ecumenism,” and “Churches and Ecclesial Com- munities Separated from the Roman Apostolic See.” Briefly, these three deal with 1) the basis for an ecumenical movement, 2) the guidelines for the movement, and 3) the partners in the movement. Deeply interwoven with the treatment of Christian disunity and the desirability of interreligious cooperation is the pervasive theme reflected in the excerpts above: that the quest for Christian unity has as both a motive force and a primary purpose the renewal of the individual Christian. It is by the example and the charity expressed in individual acceptance of reform that there is hope for ultimate unity; and it is the point of that desired unity that it will enable each individual to renew himself by closer communion with all. The tragedy of disunity is not only in its effect on the institutional com- munions but in its effect on their members. Realizing that there is a variety and disparity among denominational creeds, the individual may feel that his commitment to one creed implies rejection of all others, that there is nothing good in them. It is a distortion of God’s Fatherhood to give it this kind of partisan character, and it is equally a distortion of mankind’s brotherhood. Dialogue among Christians is never a matter of Mr. A’s defeating Mr. B in religious argument. Both A and B are “right” when they are thinking and working for each other; neither is “right” when he is not. Christ Himself made that clear: “By this shall they know you, that you love one another.” The roots of the Decree on Ecumenism are to be found in the Constitution On the Church, the thirty-thousand word statement on the nature of the Church. In its nuclear concept of the People of God, the Constitution expressly states that the Church “is linked with those who, being baptized, are honored with the name of Christian, though they do not profess the faith in its entirety or do not preserve unity of communion with the successor of Peter. For there are many who honor Sacred Scripture . . . they lovingly believe in God the Father ii Almighty and in Christ, the Son of God and Savior . . . Many of them rejoice in the episcopate, celebrate the Holy Eucharist and cultivate devotion toward the Virgin Mother of God. . . . Likewise we can say that in some real way they are joined with us in the Holy Spirit, for to them too He gives His gifts and graces whereby He is operative among them with His sanctifying power. ... In all of Christ’s disciples the Spirit arouses the desire to be peacefully united, in the manner determined by Christ, as one flock under one shepherd, and He prompts them to pursue this end.” The Decree On Ecumenism expands and develops this concept at length, relating it to the call for self-renewal, dialogue and coopera- tion that will lead to a gradual reunion in Christendom ... a reunion stable in its mutual charity, dynamic in its diversity. In treating this urgent effort to convert present dissension into a natural diversity, special mention of the Orthodox Churches is indi- cated. The schism of East and West is the oldest and saddest rent in the seamless robe of Christ. The friction that developed between Rome and Constantinople between the sixth and eleventh centuries was more liturgical than doctrinal, and to this day there is no question but that the Orthodox bishops, priests and sacraments are valid. The Decree On Ecumenism honors the Eastern Church, citing its important doctrinal contributions “on the Trinity, on the Word of God Who took flesh of the Virgin Mary.” As to the liturgical differ- ences that have grown up under local, autonomous prelates in the East, the decree states that “far from being an obstacle to the Church’s unity, a certain diversity of customs and observances only adds to her splendor . . .” With regard to the preservation of autonomy in the Eastern Churches, the Council “solemnly declares that the Churches of the East, while remembering the necessary unity of the whole Church, have the power to govern themselves according to the disci- plines proper to them, since these are better suited to the character of the faithful, and more for the good of their souls.” iii When, on December 7, 1965, Pope Paul and Patriarch Athenagoras deplored the writs of excommunication exchanged 900 years before by Rome and Constantinople, they converted that 11th century fusil- lade of political exasperation into a 20th century concordat of Chris- tian love. (It might be pointed out that the excommunication of the Patriarch of Constantinople in 1054 was issued by papal legates who may or may not have exceeded their authority. In any event, the Church of Constantinople itself was not, and never has been, excom- municated by the Holy See.) The whole tenor of the Decree On Ecumenism is one of realistic fraternity. It is realistic in that it does not try to gloss over the deep differences that persist between Christians; it does not envision a mass migration back to Rome. It is fraternal in the reverent respect it extends to all who seek God. Religion is, then, for all people as people. That Protestants, Catho- lics and Jews are, first of all, human beings, is a truism that needs to be affirmed more often that it is. Co-humanity is the ultimate basis— the only true basis—for co-religion. It is not any institutional, national, racial, political, or even intellectual unanimity that makes men unite in religious communion. It is in the realization that we are all “in one flesh.” If this were not true, Christianity would be just another faction and the word “Catholic” a travesty. In the words of Maximos IV, Patriarch of Antioch, Syria: “If one cannot be a Catholic unless he gives up his own liturgy, hierarchy, patristic traditions, history, hymnography, art, language, culture, and spiritual heritage, and adopts the rites, philosophical and theological thought, religious poetry, liturgical language, culture and spirituality of a particular group, be it the best, then the Church is not the great gift of God to the whole world but a faction ... a human institution subservient to the interests of one group. Such a Church can- not be the true Church of Christ.” iv To non-Catholic Christians, the rupture in the Church’s solidarity that occurred in the 16th century created the space for diversity and dissent in what was becoming a monolithic and stifling religious structure. Doctrinal and liturgical disputes were certainly no tragedy in themselves. The thousand political and ethical pressures that led to the Reformation could have given rise to a new Christian mode and range. The tragedy lay in the failure of the new Christian polarity to be incorporated with the old. The tragedy lay not in the rift but in the mutual rebukes and reprisals that came from it. Christians have a great deal to learn from one another, and Catho- lics have a great deal to learn from the Decree On Ecumenism. There are important new statements on the manner in which Church teach- ing is expressed and interpreted, statements which have profound implications. They are not designed to appease the critics of hierarchic authority but to apprise those subject to it of their own active, con- tributive part in the governance of the Church and the Kingship of Christ. Here are a few of the highly charged portions of the Decree relating to the exercise of teaching authority in the Church. —From Para. 6: “Christ summons the Church to continual reforma- tion as she sojourns here on earth. The Church is always in need of this . . . Thus if, in various times and circumstances, there have been deficiencies in moral conduct or in church discipline, or even in the way that church teaching has been formulated. . . . These can and should be set right at the opportune moment.” —From Para. 11: The way and method in which the Catholic faith is expressed should never become an obstacle to dialogue with our brethren. “Moreover, in ecumenical dialogue, Catholic theologians . . . should remember that in Catholic doctrine there exists a ‘hierarchy’ of truths, since they vary in their relation to the fundamental Christian faith.” v —From Para. 17: “What has . . . been said about the lawful variety that can exist in the Church must also be taken to apply to the dif- ferences in theological expressions of doctrine.” These passages represent something of the tone adopted in the Decree and the kind of pregnant pronouncement to be found in its pages. Clearly the Council Fathers have found a new purchase on the problems confronting Christ’s Church in the 20th century—and that purchase is diversity, the plural approach. Just as we can all learn from one another, so can we all contribute to one another’s under- standing of the continuing mystery of the Church. vi PAUL, BISHOP, SERVANT OF THE SERVANTS OF GOD TOGETHER WITH THE FATHERS OF THE SACRED COUNCIL FOR A PERMANENT RECORD OF THE MATTER DECREE ON ECUMENISM INTRODUCTION i. T he RESTORATION OF UNITY among all Christians is one of the principal concerns of the Second Vatican Council. Christ the Lord founded one Church and one Church only. However, many Christian communions present themselves to men as the true inheritors of Jesus Christ; all indeed profess to be followers of the Lord but differ in mind and go their different ways, as if Christ Himself were divided . 1 Such division openly contradicts the will of Christ, scandalizes the world, and damages the holy cause of preaching the Gospel to every creature. But the Lord of Ages wisely and patiently follows out the plan of grace on our behalf, sinners that we are. In recent times more than ever before. He 1 Cf. 1 Cor. i, 13. 1 has been rousing divided Christians to remorse over their divisions and to a longing for unity. Everywhere large numbers have felt the impulse of this grace, and among our separated brethren also there increases from day to day the movement, fostered by the grace of the Holy Spirit, for the restoration of unity among all Christians. This movement toward unity is called "ecumenical." Those belong to it who invoke the Triune God and confess Jesus as Lord and Saviour, doing this not merely as individuals but also as corporate bodies. For almost everyone regards the body in which he has heard the Gospel as his Church and indeed, God's Church. All however, though in different ways, long for the one visible Church of God, a Church truly universal and set forth into the world that the world may be converted to the Gospel and so be saved, to the glory of God. The Sacred Council gladly notes all this. It has already declared its teaching on the Church, and now, moved by a desire for the restoration of unity among all the followers of Christ, it wishes to set before all Catholics the ways and means by which they too can respond to this grace and to this divine call. CHAPTER 1 CATHOLIC PRINCIPLES ON ECUMENISM 2 . W hat has revealed the love of God among us is that the Father has sent into the world His only-begotten Son, so that, being made man. He might by His redemption give new life to the entire human race and unify it. 2 Before offering Himself up as a spotless victim upon the altar, Christ prayed to His Father for all who believe in Him: "that they all may be one; even as thou. Father, are in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us, so that the world may believe that thou has sent me".3 In His Church He instituted the wonderful sacrament of the Eucharist by which the unity of His Church is both signified and made a reality. He gave His followers a new commandment to love one another, 4 and promised the Spirit, their Advocate,5 who, as Lord and life-giver, should remain with them forever. 2 Cf. l Jn. 4, g; Col. i, 18-20; Jn. n, 52. 3 Jn. 17, 21. 4 Cf. Jn. 13, 34. 5 Cf. Jn. 16, 7. 2 After being lifted upon the cross and glorified, the Lord Jesus poured forth His Spirit as He had promised, and through the Spirit He has called and gathered together the people of the New Covenant, who are the Church, into a unity of faith, hope and charity, as the Apostle teaches us: "There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to the one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one Baptism"'. 6 For ""all you who have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ . . . for you are all one in Christ Jesus "".7 It is the Holy Spirit, dwelling in those who believe and pervading and ruling over the Church as a whole, who brings about that wonderful communion of the faithful. He brings them into intimate union with Christ, so that He is the principle of the Church's unity. The distribution of graces and offices is His work too, 8 enriching the Church of Jesus Christ with different functions ""in order to equip the saints for the work of service, so as to build up the body of Christ'". 9 In order to establish this His holy Church everywhere in the world till the end of time, Christ entrusted to the College of the Twelve the task of teaching, ruling and sanctifying . 10 Among their number He selected Peter, and after his confession of faith determined that on him He would build His Church. Also to Peter He promised the keys of the kingdom of heaven , 11 and after His pro- fession of love, entrusted all His sheep to him to be confirmed in faith 12 and shepherded in perfect unity . 13 Christ Jesus Himself was forever to remain the chief cornerstone 14 and shepherd of our souls . 15 Jesus Christ, then, willed that the apostles and their successors—the bishops with Peter's successor at their head—should preach the Gospel faith- fully, administer the sacraments, and rule the Church in love. It is thus, under the action of the Holy Spirit, that Christ wills His people to increase, and He perfects His people's fellowship in unity: in their confessing the one faith, celebrating divine worship in common, and keeping the fraternal harmony of the family of God. 6 Epk- 4/ 4-5* 7 Gal. 3, 27-28. 8 Cf. 1 Cor. 12, 4-11. 9 Eph. 4, 12. 10 Cf. Mt. 28, 18-20, collato Jn. 20, 21-23. 11 Cf. Mf. 16, 18, collato Mt. 18, 18. 12 Cf. Lc. 22, 32. 13 Cf. Jn. 21, 15-18. 14 Cf. Eph. 2, 20. 15 Cf. 1 Petr. 2, 25; CONC. VATICANUM I, Sess. IV (1870), Constitutio Pastor Aeter- nus: Collac 7, 482 a. 3 The Church, then, is God's only flock; it is like a standard lifted high for the nations to see it: 16 for it serves all mankind through the Gospel of peace 17 as it makes its pilgrim way in hope toward the goal of the fatherland above.18 This is the sacred mystery of the unity of the Church, in Christ and through Christ, the Holy Spirit energizing its various functions. It is a mystery that finds its highest exemplar and source in the unity of the Persons of the Trinity: the Father and the Son in the Holy Spirit, one God. 3. Even in the beginnings of this one and only Church of God there arose certain rifts, 19 which the Apostle strongly condemned.20 But in subsequent centuries much more serious dissensions made their appearance and quite large communities came to be separated from full communion with the Catholic Church—for which, often enough, men of both sides were to blame. The children who are born into these Communities and who grow up believing in Christ cannot be accused of the sin involved in the separation, and the Catholic Church embraces upon them as brothers, with respect and affection. For men who believe in Christ and have been truly baptized are in communion with the Catholic Church even though this communion is imperfect. The differences that exist in varying degrees between them and the Catholic Church—whether in doctrine and sometimes in discipline, or concerning the structure of the Church—do indeed create many obstacles, sometimes serious ones, to full ecclesiastical communion. The ecumenical movement is striving to overcome these obstacles. But even in spite of them it remains true that all who have been justified by faith in Baptism are members of Christ's body,21 and have a right to be called Christian, and so are correctly accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church. 22 Moreover, some and even very many of the significant elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church itself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church: the written word of God; the life of grace; faith, hope and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit, and visible elements too. All of these, which come from Christ and lead back to Christ, belong by right to the one Church of Christ. 16 Cf. Is. 11, 10-12. 17 Cf. Eph. 2, 17-18, collato Me. 16, 15. 18 Cf. 1 Petr. 1, 3-9. 19 Cf. 1 Cor. ii, 18-19; Oal. i, 6-9; 1 Jn. 2, 18-19. 20 Cf. 1 Cor. 1, 11 sqq; 11, 22. 21 Cf. CONC. FLORENTINUM, Sess. VIII (1439), Decretum Exultate Deo : Mansi 31, 1055 A. 22 Cf. S. AUGUSTINUS, In Ps. 32, Enarr. II, 29: PL. 36, 299. 4 The brethren divided from us also use many liturgical actions of the Christian religion. These most certainly can truly engender a life of grace in ways that vary according to the condition of each Church or Community. These liturgical actions must be regarded as capable of giving access to the community of salvation. It follows that the separated Churches 23 and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church. Nevertheless, our separated brethren, whether considered as individuals or as Communities and Churches, are not blessed with that unity which Jesus Christ wished to bestow on all those who through Him were born again into one body, and with Him quickened to newness of life—that unity which the Holy Scriptures and the ancient Tradition of the Church proclaim. For it is only through Christ's Catholic Church, which is "the all-embracing means of salvation," that they can benefit fully from the means of salvation. We believe that Our Lord entrusted all the blessings of the New Covenant to the apostolic college alone, of which Peter is the head, in order to establish the one Body of Christ on earth to which all should be fully incorporated who belong in any way to the people of God. This people of God, though still in its members liable to sin, is ever growing in Christ during its pilgrimage on earth, and is guided by God's gentle wisdom, according to His hidden designs, until it shall happily arrive at the fullness of eternal glory in the heavenly Jerusalem. 4. Today, in many parts of the world, under the inspiring grace of the Holy Spirit, many efforts are being made in prayer, word and action to attain that full- ness of unity which Jesus Christ desires. The Sacred Council exhorts all the Catholic faithful to recognize the signs of the times and to take an active and intelligent part in the work of ecumenism. The term "ecumenical movement" indicates the initiative and activities planned and undertaken, according to the various needs of the Church and as opportunities offer, to promote Christian unity. These are: first, every effort to avoid expressions, judgments and actions which do not represent the condition 23 Cf. CONC. LATERANENSE IV (1215) Constitutio IV: Mansi 22, 990; CONC. LUGDUNENSE II (1274), Professio fidei Michaelis Palaeologi: Mansi 24, 71 E; CONC. FLORENTINUM, Sess. VI (1439), Definitio Laetentur caeli: Mansi 31, 1026 E. 5 of our separated brethem with truth and fairness and so make mutual relations with them more difficult; then, "dialogue" between competent experts from different Churches and Communities. At these meetings, which are organized in a religious spirit, each explains the teaching of his Communion in greater depth and brings out clearly its distinctive features. In such dialogue, everyone gains a truer knowledge and more just appreciation of the teaching and religious life of both Communions. In addition, the way is prepared for cooperation be- tween them in the duties for the common good of humanity which are demand- ed by every Christian conscience; and, wherever this is allowed, there is prayer in common. Finally, all are led to examine their own faithfulness to Christ's will for the Church and accordingly to undertake with vigor the task of renewal and reform. When such actions are undertaken prudently and patiently by the Catholic faithful, with the attentive guidance of their bishops, they promote justice and truth, concord and collaboration, as well as the spirit of brotherly love and unity. This is the way that, when the obstacles to perfect ecclesiastical com- munion have been gradually overcome, all Christians will at last, in a common celebration of the Eucharist, be gathered into the one and only Church in that unity which Christ bestowed on His Church from the beginning. We believe that this unity subsists in the Catholic Church as something she can never lose, and we hope that it will continue to increase until the end of time. However, it is evident that, when individuals wish for full Catholic com- munion, their preparation and reconciliation is an undertaking which of its nature is distinct from ecumenical action. But there is no opposition between the two, since both proceed from the marvelous ways of God. Catholics, in their ecumenical work, must assuredly be concerned for their separated brethern, praying for them, keeping them informed about the Church, making the first approaches toward them. But their primary duty is to make a careful and honest appraisal of whatever needs to be done or renewed in the Catholic household itself, in order that its life may bear witness more clearly and faithfully to the teachings and institutions which have come to it from Christ through the Apostles. For although the Catholic Church has been endowed with all divinely re- vealed truth and with all means of grace, yet its members fail to live by them with all the fervor that they should, so that the radiance of the Church's image is less clear in the eyes of our separated brethern and of the world at large, and 6 the growth of God's kingdom is delayed. All Catholics must therefore aim at Christian perfection 24 and, each according to his station, play his part that the Church may daily be more purified and renewed. For the Church must bear in her own body the humility and dying of Jesus , 25 against the day when Christ will present her to Himself in all her glory without spot or wrinkle . 26 All in the Church must preserve unity in essentials. But let all, according to the gifts they have received enjoy a proper freedom, in their various forms of spiritual life and discipline, in their different liturgical rites, and even in their theological elaborations of revealed truth. In all things let charity prevail. If they are true to this course of action, they will be giving fever better expression to the authentic catholicity and apostolicity of the Church. On the other hand. Catholics must gladly acknowledge and esteem the truly Christian endowments from our common heritage which are to be found among our separated brethem. It is right and salutary to recognize the riches of Christ and virtuous works in the lives of others who are bearing witness to Christ, sometimes even to the shedding of their blood. For God is always wonderful in His works and worthy of all praise. Nor should we forget that anything wrought by the grace of the Holy Spirit in the hearts of our separated brethern can be a help to our own edifica- tion. Whatever is truly Christian is never contrary to what genuinely belongs to the faith; indeed, it can always bring a deeper realization of the mystery of Christ and the Church. Nevertheless, the divisions among Christians prevent the Church from attain- ing the fullness of catholicity proper to her, in those of her sons who, though attached to her by Baptism, are yet separated from full communion with her. Furthermore, the Church herself finds it more difficult to express in actual life her full catholicity in all her bearings. This Sacred Council is gratified to note that the participation by the Cath- olic faithful in ecumenical work is growing daily. It commends this work to the bishops everywhere in the world to be vigorously stimulated by them and guided with prudence. 24 Cf. lac. 1, 4; Rom. 12, 1-2. 25 Cf. 2 Cor. 4, 10; Phil. 2, 5-8. 26 Cf. Eph. 5, 27. 7 CHAPTER 11 THE PRACTICE OF ECUMENISM 5. 1 he attainment of union is the concern of the whole Church, faith- ful and shepherds alike. This concern extends to everyone, according to his talent, whether it be exercised in his daily Christian life or in his theological and historical research. This concern itself reveals already to some extent the bond of brotherhood between all Christians and it helps toward that full and perfect unity which God in His kindness wills. 6. Every renewal of the Church 27 is essentially grounded in an increase of fidelity to her own calling. Undoubtedly this is the basis of the movement toward unity. Christ summons the Church to continual reformation as she sojourns here on earth. The Church is always in need of this, in so far as she is an institution of men here on earth. Thus if, in various times and circumstances, there have been deficiencies in moral conduct or in church discipline, or even in the way that church teaching has been formulated—to be carefully distinguished from the deposit of faith itself—these can and should be set right at the opportune moment. Church renewal has therefore notable ecumenical importance. Already in various spheres of the Church's life, this renewal is taking place. The Biblical and liturgical movements, the preaching of the word of God and catechetics, the apostolate of the laity, new forms of religious life and the spirituality of married life, and the Church's social teaching and activity—all these should be considered as pledges and signs of the future progress of ecumenism. 7. There can be no ecumenism worthy of the name without a change of heart. For it is from renewal of the inner life of our minds, 28 from self-denial and an unstinted love that desires of unity take their rise and develop in a ma- ture way. We should therefore pray to the Holy Spirit for the grace to be genuinely self-denying, humble, gentle in the service of others, and to have an 27 Cf. CONC. LATERANSE V, Sess. XII (1517), Constitutio Constituti: Mansi 32, 988 B-C. 28 Cf. Eph. 4/ 24. 8 attitude of brotherly generosity towards them. St. Paul says: "I, therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, beg you to lead a life worthy of the calling to which you have been called, with all humility and meekness, with patience, forbearing one another in love, eager to maintain the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace". 29 This exhortation is directed especially to those raised to sacred Orders precisely that the work of Christ may be continued. He came among us "not to be served but to serve". 30 The words of St. John hold good about sins against unity: "If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us".31 So we humbly beg pardon of God and of our separated brethem, just as we forgive them that trespass against us. All the faithful should remember that the more effort they make to live holier lives according to the Gospel, the better will they further Christian unity and put it into practice. For the closer their union with the Father, the Word, and the Spirit, the more deeply and easily will they be able to grow in mutual brotherly love. 8. This change of heart and holiness of life, along with public and private prayer for the unity of Christians, should be regarded as the soul of the whole ecumenical movement, and merits the name, "spiritual ecumenism". It is a recognized custom for Catholics to have frequent recourse to that prayer for the unity of the Church which the Saviour Himself on the eve of His death so fervently appealed to His Father: "That they may all be one".32 In certain special circumstances, such as the prescribed prayers "for unity," and during ecumenical gatherings, it is allowable, indeed desirable that Cath- olics should join in prayer with their separated brethern. Such prayers in com- mon are certainly an effective means of obtaining the grace of unity, and they are a true expression of the ties which still bind Catholics to their separated brethern. "For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them". 33 Yet worship in common (communicatio in sacris ) is not to be considered as a means to be used indiscriminately for the restoration of Christian unity. 29 Eph . 4, 1-3. 30 Mt . 20, 28. 31 1 Jn . 1, 10. 32 Jn . 17, 21. 33 Mt . 18, 20. 9 There are two main principles governing the practice of such common worship: first, the bearing witness to the unity of the Church, and second, the sharing in the means of grace. Witness to the unity of the Church very generally for- bids common worship to Christians, but the grace to be had from it sometimes commends this practice. The course to be adopted, with due regard to all the circumstances of time, place, and persons, is to be decided by local episcopal authority, unless otherwise provided for by the Bishops' Conference according to its statutes, or by the Holy See. 9. We must get to know the outlook of our separated brethem. To achieve this purpose, study is of necessity required, and this must be pursued with a sense of realism and good will. Catholics, who already have a proper grounding, need to acquire a more adequate understanding of the respective doctrines of our separated brethern, their history, their spiritual and liturgical life, their religious psychology and general background. Most valuable for this purpose are meet- ings of the two sides—especially for discussion of theological problems—where each can treat with the other on an equal footing—provided that those who take part in them are truly competent and have the approval of the bishops. From such dialogue will emerge still more clearly what the situation of the Catholic Church really is. In this way too the outlook of our separated brethem will be better understood, and our own belief more aptly explained. 10. Sacred theology and other branches of knowledge, especially of an his- torical nature, must be taught with due regard for the ecumenical point of view, so that they may correspond more exactly with the facts. It is most important that future shepherds and priests should have mastered a theology that has been carefully worked out in this way and not polemically, especially with regard to those aspects which concern the relations of separated brethren with the Catholic Church. This importance is the greater because the instruction and spiritual forma- tion of the faithful and of religious depends so largely on the formation which their priests have received. Moreover, Catholics engaged in missionary work in the same territories as other Christians ought to know, particularly in these times, the problems and the benefits in their apostolate which derive from the ecumenical movement. 11. The way and method in which the Catholic faith is expressed should never become an obstacle to dialogue with our brethren. It is, of course, essential 10 that the doctrine should be clearly presented in its entirety. Nothing is so foreign to the spirit of ecumenism as a false irenicism, in which the purity of Catholic doctrine suffers loss and its genuine and certain meaning is clouded. At the same time, the Catholic faith must be explained more profoundly and precisely, in such a way and in such terms as our separated brethren can also really understand. Moreover, in ecumenical dialogue. Catholic theologians standing fast by the teaching of the Church and investigating the divine mysteries with the separated brethren must proceed with love for the truth, with charity, and with humility. When comparing doctrines with one another, they should remember that in Catholic doctrine there exists a "hierarchy" of truths, since they vary in their relation to the fundamental Christian faith. Thus the way will be opened by which through fraternal rivalry all will be stirred to a deeper understanding and a clearer presentation of the unfathomable riches of Christ. 34 12. Before the whole world let all Christians confess their faith in the triune God, one and three in the incarnate Son of God, our Redeemer and Lord. United in their efforts, and with mutual respect, let them bear witness to our common hope which does not play us false. In these days when cooperation in social matters is so widespread, all men without exception are called to work together, with much greater reason all those who believe in God, but most of all, all Christians in that they bear the name of Christ. Cooperation among Christians vividly expresses the relationship which in fact already unites them, and it sets in clearer relief the features of Christ the Servant. This cooperation, which has already begun in many countries, should be developed more and more, particularly in regions where a social and technical evolution is taking place be it in a just evaluation of the dignity of the human person, the establishment of the blessings of peace, the application of Gospel principles to social life, the advancement of the arts and sciences in a truly Christian spirit, or also in the use of various remedies to relieve the afflictions of our times such as famine and natural disasters, illiteracy and poverty, housing shortage and the unequal dis- tribution of wealth. All believers in Christ can, through this cooperation, be led to acquire a better knowledge and appreciation of one another, and so pave the way to Christian unity. 34 Cf. Eph. 3, 8. li CHAPTER 111 CHURCHES AND ECCLES1AL COMMUNITIES SEPARATED FROM THE ROMAN APOSTOLIC SEE 13. VV e now turn our attention to the two chief types of division as they affect the seamless robe of Christ. The first divisions occurred in the East, when the dogmatic formulae of the Councils of Ephesus and Chalcedon were challenged, and later when ecclesiastical communion between the Eastern Patriarchates and the Roman See was dissolved. Other divisions arose more than four centuries later in the West, stemming from the events which are usually referred to as "The Reformation". As a result, many Communions, national or confessional, were separated from the Roman See. Among those in which Catholic traditions and institutions in part continue to exist, the Anglican Communion occupies a special place. These various divisions differ greatly from one another not only by reason of their origin, place and time, but especially in the nature and seriousness of questions bearing on faith and the structure of the Church. Therefore, without minimizing the differences between the various Christian bodies, and without overlooking the bonds between them which exist in spite of divisions, this holy Council decides to propose the following considerations for prudent ecumenical action. I. The Special Consideration of the Eastern Churches 14. For many centuries the Church of the East and that of the West each followed their separate ways though linked in a brotherly union of faith and sacramental life; the Roman See by common consent acted as guide when dis- agreements arose between them over matters of faith or discipline. Among other matters of great importance, it is a pleasure for this Council to remind everyone that there flourish in the East many particular or local Churches, among which the Patriarchal Churches hold first place, and of these not a few pride them- selves in tracing their origins back to the apostles themselves. Hence a matter of primary concern and care among the Easterns, in their local churches, has 12 been, and still is, to preserve the family ties of common faith and charity which ought to exist between sister Churches. Similarly it must not be forgotten that from the beginning the Churches of the East have had a treasury from which the Western Church has drawn extensively—in liturgical practice, spiritual tradition, and law. Nor must we undervalue the fact that it was the ecumenical councils held in the East that defined the basic dogmas of the Christian faith, on the Trinity, on the Word of God Who took flesh of the Virgin Mary. To preserve this faith these Churches have suffered and still suffer much. However, the heritage handed down by the apostles was received with dif- ferences of form and manner, so that from the earliest times of the Church it was explained variously in different places, owing to diversities of genius and conditions of life. All this, quite apart from external causes, prepared the way for divisions arising also from a lack of charity and mutual understanding. For this reason the Holy Council urges all, but especially those who intend to devote themselves to the restoration of full communion hoped for between the Churches of the East and the Catholic Church, to give due consideration to this special feature of the origin and growth of the Eastern Churches, and to the character of the relations which obtained between them and the Roman See before separation. They must take full account of all these factors and, where this is done, it will greatly contribute to the dialogue that is looked for. 15. Everyone also knows with what great love the Christians of the East celebrate the sacred liturgy, especially the eucharistic celebration, source of the Church's life and pledge of future glory, in which the faithful, united with their bishop, have access to God the Father through the Son, the Word made flesh. Who suffered and has been glorified, and so, in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, they enter into communion with the most holy Trinity, being made "sharers of the divine nature". 35 Hence, through the celebration of the Holy Eucharist in each of these churches, the Church of God is built up and grows in stature 36 and through concelebration, their communion with one another is made manifest. In this liturgical worship, the Christians of the East pay high tribute, in beautiful hymns of praise, to Mary ever Virgin, whom the ecumenical Council of Ephesus solemnly proclaimed to be the holy Mother of God, so that Christ 35 2 Petr. 1, 4. 36 Cf. S. IOANNES CHRYSOSTOMOS, In loannem Homelia XLVI, PG 59, 260-262. 13 might be acknowledged as being truly Son of God and Son of Man, according to the Scriptures. Many also are the saints whose praise they sing, among them the Fathers of the universal Church. These Churches, although separated from us, yet possess true sacraments and above all, by apostolic succession, the priesthood and the Eucharist, whereby they are linked with us in closest intimacy. Therefore some worship in common (communicatio in sacris), given suitable circumstances and the approval of Church authority, is not only possible but to be encouraged. Moreover, in the East are found the riches of those spiritual traditions which are given expression especially in monastic life. There from the glorious times of the holy Fathers, monastic spirituality flourished which, then later flowed over into the Western world, and there provided the source from which Latin monastic life took its rise and has drawn fresh vigor ever since. Catholics therefore are earnestly recommended to avail themselves of the spiritual riches of the Eastern Fathers which lift up the whole man to the contemplation of the divine. The very rich liturgical and spiritual heritage of the Eastern Churches should be known, venerated, preserved and cherished by all. They must recognize that this is of supreme importance for the faithful preservation of the fullness of Christian tradition, and for bringing about reconciliation between Eastern and Western Christians. 16. Already from the earliest times the Eastern Churches followed their own forms of ecclesiastical law and custom, which were sanctioned by the approval of the Fathers of the Church, of synods, and even of ecumenical coun- cils. Far from being an obstacle to the Church's unity, a certain diversity of customs and observances only adds to her splendor, and is of great help in carrying out her mission, as has already been stated. To remove, then, all shadow of doubt, this holy Council solemnly declares that the Churches of the East, while remembering the necessary unity of the whole Church, have the power to govern themselves according to the disciplines proper to them, since these are better suited to the character of their faithful, and more for the good of their souls. The perfect observance of this traditional principle not always indeed carried out in practice, is one of the essential prerequisites for any restoration of unity. 17. What has just been said about the lawful variety that can exist in the Church must also be taken to apply to the differences in theological expression of doctrine. In the study of revelation East and West have followed different *4 methods, and have developed differently their understanding and confession of God's truth. It is hardly surprising, then, if from time to time one tradition has come nearer to a full appreciation of some aspects of a mystery of revelation than the other, or has expressed it to better advantage. In such cases, these various theological expressions are to be considered often as mutually comple- mentary rather than conflicting. Where the authentic theological traditions of the Eastern Church are concerned, we must recognize the admirable way in which they have their roots in Holy Scripture, and how they are nurtured and given expression in the life of the liturgy. They derive their strength too from the living tradition of the apostles and from the works of the Fathers and spiritual writers of the Eastern Churches. Thus they promote the right ordering of Chris- tian life and, indeed, pave the way to a full vision of Christian truth. All this heritage of spirituality and liturgy, of discipline and theology, in its various traditions, this holy synod declares to belong to the full Catholic and apostolic character of the Church. We thank God that many Eastern children of the Catholic Church, who preserve this heritage, and wish to express it more faithfully and completely in their lives, are already living in full communion with their brethren who follow the tradition of the West. 18. After taking all these factors into consideration, this Sacred Council solemnly repeats the declaration of previous Councils and Roman Pontiffs, that for the restoration or the maintenance of unity and communion it is necessary "to impose no burden beyond what is essential".37 It is the Council's urgent desire that, in the various organizations and living activities of the Church, every effort should be made toward the gradual realization of this unity, especially by prayer, and by fraternal dialogue on points of doctrine and the more pressing pastoral problems of our time. Similarly, the Council commends to the shepherds and faithful of the Catholic Church to develop closer relations with those who are no longer living in the East but are far from home, so that friendly collabo- ration with them may increase, in the spirit of love, to the exclusion of all feel- ing of rivalry or strife. If this cause is whole-heartedly promoted, the Council hopes that the barrier dividing the Eastern Church and Western Church will be removed, and that at last there may be but the one dwelling, firmly established on Christ Jesus, the cornerstone, who will make both one.38 II. Separated Churches and Ecclesial Communities in the West 37 Acts 15, 28. 38 Cf. CONC. FLORENTINUM, Sess. VI (1439), Definitio Laetentur caeli: Mansi 31, 1026 E. 15 i g. In the great upheaval which began in the West toward the end of the Middle Ages, and in later times too. Churches and ecclesial Communities came to be separated from the Apostolic See of Rome. Yet they have retained a particu- larly close affinity with the Catholic Church as a result of the long centuries in which all Christendom lived together in ecclesiastical communion. However, since these Churches and ecclesial Communities, on account of their different origins, and different teachings in matters of doctrine on the spiritual life, vary considerably not only with us, but also among themselves, the task of describing them at all adequately is extremely difficult; and we have no intention of making such an attempt here. Although the ecumenical movement and the desire for peace with the Catholic Church have not yet taken hold everywhere, it is our hope that ecumenical feeling and mutual esteem may gradually increase among all men. It must however be admitted that in these Churches and ecclesial Communi- ties there exist important differences from the Catholic Church, not only of an historical, sociological, psychological and cultural character, but especially in the interpretation of revealed truth. To make easier the ecumenical dialogue in spite of these differences, we wish to set down some considerations which can, and indeed should, serve as a basis and encouragement for such dialogue. 20. Our thoughts turn first to those Christians who make open confession of Jesus Christ as God and Lord and as the sole Mediator between God and men, to the glory of the one God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. We are aware indeed that there exist considerable divergences from the doctrine of the Catholic Church concerning Christ Himself, the Word of God made flesh, the work of redemption and consequently, concerning the mystery and ministry of the Church, and the role of Mary in the plan of salvation. But we rejoice to see that our separated brethren look to Christ as the source and center of Church unity. Their longing for union with Christ inspires them to seek an ever closer unity, and also to bear witness to their faith among the peoples of the earth. 21. A love and reverence of Sacred Scripture which might be described as devotion, leads our brethren to a constant meditative study of the sacred text. For the Gospel "is the power of God for salvation to every one who has faith, to the Jew first and then to the Greek". 39 While invoking the Holy Spirit, they seek in these very Scriptures God as it were speaking to them in Christ, Whom the prophets foretold. Who is the Word 39 Rom. i, i6 . 16 of God made flesh for us. They contemplate in the Scriptures the life of Christ and what the Divine Master taught and did for our salvation, especially the mysteries of His death and resurrection. But while the Christians who are separated from us hold the divine authority of the Sacred Books, they differ from ours—some in one way, some in another — regarding the relationship between Scripture and the Church. For, according to Catholic belief, the authentic teaching authority of the Church has a special place in the interpretation and preaching of the written word of God. But Sacred Scriptures provide for the work of dialogue an instrument of the highest value in the mighty hand of God for the attainment of that unity which the Saviour holds out to all. 22. Whenever the Sacrament of Baptism is duly administered as Our Lord instituted it, and is received with the right dispositions, a person is truly incorpo- rated into the crucified and glorfied Christ, and reborn to a sharing of the divine life, as the Apostles say: "You were buried together with Him in Baptism and in Him also rose again—through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead".40 Baptism therefore establishes a sacramental bond of unity which links all who have been reborn by it. But of itself Baptism is only a beginning, an inaugu- ration wholly directed toward the fullness of life in Christ. Baptism, therefore, envisages a complete profession of faith, complete incorporation in the system of salvation such as Christ willed it to be, and finally complete ingrafting in eucharistic communion. Though the ecclesial Communities which are separated from us lack the fullness of unity with us flowing from Baptism, and though we believe they have not retained the proper reality of the eucharistic mystery in its fullness, especially because of the absence of the sacrament of Orders, nevertheless when they com- memorate His death and resurrection in the Lord's Supper, they profess that it signifies life in communion with Christ and look forward to His coming in glory. Therefore the teaching concerning the Lord's Supper, the other sacraments, wor- ship, the ministry of the Church, must be the subject of the dialogue. 23. The daily Christian life of these brethren is nourished by their faith in Christ and strengthened by the grace of Baptism and by hearing the word of God. This shows itself in their private prayer, their meditation on the Bible, in 40 Col. 2, 12} cf. Rom. 6 , 4. 17 their Christian family life, and in the worshp of a community gathered together to praise God. Moreover, their form of worship sometimes displays notable features of the liturgy which they shared with us of old. Their faith in Christ bears fruit in praise and thanksgiving for the blessings received from the hands of God. Among them, too, is a strong sense of justice and a true charity toward their neighbor. This active faith has been responsible for many organizations for the relief of spiritual and material distress, the furtherance of the education of youth, the improvement of the social conditions of life, and the promotion of peace throughout the world. While it is true that many Christians understand the moral teaching of the Gospel differently from Catholics, and do not accept the same solutions to the more difficult problems of modern society, nevertheless they share our desire to stand by the words of Christ as the source of Christian virtue, and to obey the command of the Apostle: "And whatever you do, in word or in work, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, giving thanks to God the Father through Him". 41 For that reason an ecumenical dialogue might start with discussion of the application of the Gospel to moral conduct. 24. Now that we have briefly set out the conditions for ecumenical action and the principles by which it is to be directed, we look with confidence to the future. This Sacred Council exhorts the faithful to refrain from superficiality and imprudent zeal, which can hinder real progress toward unity. Their ecumenical action must be fully and sincerely Catholic, that is to say, faithful to the truth which we have received from the apostles and Fathers of the Church, in harmony with the faith which the Catholic Church has always professed, and at the same time directed toward that fullness to which Our Lord wills His Body to grow in the course of time. It is the urgent wish of this Holy Council that the measures undertaken by the sons of the Catholic Church should develop in conjunction with those of our separated brethren so that no obstacle be put in the ways of divine Providence and no preconceived judgments impair the future inspirations of the Holy Spirit. The Council moreover professes its awareness that human powers and capacities cannot achieve this holy objective—the reconciling of all Christians in the unity of the one and only Church of Christ. It is because of this that the Council rests all its hope on the prayer of Christ for the Church, on our Father's love for us, and on the power of the Holy Spirit. "And hope does not disappoint, because 41 Col. 3, 17. 18 God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us". 42 E ach and all these matters which are set forth in this Decree have been favorably voted on by the Fathers of the Council. And We, by the apostolic authority given Us by Christ and in union with the Fathers, approve, decree and establish them in the Holy Spirit and command that they be promulgated for the glory of God. Given in Rome at St. Peter's, November 21, 1964 Paul Pp. VI 42 Rom. 5, 5. 19 DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Continual reformation within the Church is prerequisite to ecumenical action. What evidence is there of Church renewal now in progress in your parish? 2. Why does ecumenical dialogue necessarily involve self-reform? Does such an attitude imply that Catholics have something to be ashamed of in their past relations with Non-Catholics? 3. Do you think that a Catholic can effectively participate in ecumenical activities if he approaches this work as an opportunity to make converts? Why? 4. All Christian truths are interrelated, and form a natural basis for dia- logue. Discuss particular areas that should be the subject of dialogue among Christians. 5. Comment on this statement: 'The Catholic Church is still the Mystical Body of Christ; the Pope is Christ's vicar on earth. What is there to discuss with Non-Catholics if it is not that God intends all men to be Catholics?" 6. Comment on this statement: "I am on rather good terms with all my Non-Catholic friends. Won't I simply risk losing these good relations by putting my religion up against theirs?" 7. Comment on this statement: "When I pray for Christian unity, doesn't that mean that I am praying to hasten the day when all will be one . . . in the Catholic Church? What else can it mean?" 8. The Decree warns Catholics against the dangers of being overly accom- modating in discussing matters of doctrine and morality with Non-Catho- lics. What are some of the areas where this danger might arise, and what can be done now to prevent both a compromise of Catholic teaching and the chance of heated argument? Price Schedule GRASS-ROOTS ECUMENISM PROGRAM COMPLETE PROGRAM KITS One copy of each booklet in a portfolio with Introduction and Program Instructions. 1 Kit $5.50 5 Kits 19.75 20 Kits 57.00 INDIVIDUAL BOOKLETS 1. “First Steps in Ecumenism” 2. “Decree on Ecumenism” 3. “Blueprints for Action” 4. “Project: Open House” 5. “Christian-Jewish Dialogues” Any of These Booklets May Be Ordered For: 20 Copies—$9.95 50 Copies—$17.50 100 Copies—$29.50 NOTE: Special quotations available on larger orders GRASS-ROOTS ECUMENISM 1312 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C., 20005