Erratum to: Clinical audit of POM-V / POM prescriptions by remote consultation via a veterinary video telemedicine smartphone application
Dr Sheila Mary Smith BVMS MRCVS1
1Vet-AI, Ebble House, Odstock, Salisbury, England, SP5 4JB
*Corresponding Author (adele.williams@vet-ai.com)
Vol 7, Issue 2 (2022)
Erratum published: 20 Jun 2022
Original paper published: 08 Jun 2022
The original article was published in Veterinary Evidence Vol 7, Issue 2 (2022): 10.18849/VE.V7I2.553
DOI: 10.18849/VE.V7I2.627
Unfortunately the original version of the article had the following two errors.
Within the Results section after Figure 6 under the sub-heading Complete / expected response to treatment was changed from:
Complete / expected response to treatment
60.3% (2,135/3,541) of remote consultations which were prescribed a POM-V / POM product resulted in the outcome complete or expected response to treatment.
Of the consults where the outcome was known (when the outcome category ‘no treatment outcome available’ was removed) 89.0% (2,135/2,399) of all treatment outcomes were complete / expected response to treatment.
To:
Complete / expected response to treatment
60.3% (2,135/3,541) of remote consultations which were prescribed a POM-V / POM product resulted in the outcome complete or expected response to treatment.
Of the consults where the outcome was known (when the outcome category ‘no treatment outcome available’ was removed) 89.0% (2,135/2,399) of all treatment outcomes were complete / expected response to treatment.
This error was in both the HTML and PDF versions. This has now been updated in both the HTML and PDF versions.
Within the Results section after Figure 6 under the sub-heading No treatment outcome available was changed from:
No treatment outcome available
Of the 3,541 consultations in which a prescription was purchased, 32.3% (1,142/3,541), had no treatment outcome available for the following reasons:
To:
No treatment outcome available
Of the 3,541 consultations in which a prescription was purchased, 32.3% (1,142/3,541), had no treatment outcome available for the following reasons:
Intellectual Property Rights
Authors of Knowledge Summaries submitted to RCVS Knowledge for publication will retain copyright in their work, and will be required to grant to RCVS Knowledge a non-exclusive licence of the rights of copyright in the materials including but not limited to the right to publish, re-publish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the materials in all languages and all media throughout the world, and to licence or permit others to do so.