Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín
0304-2847
2248-7026
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v75n1.95804

Recibido: 4 de noviembre de 2021; Aceptado: 22 de noviembre de 2021

Antifungal effect from Zingiber officinale, Aloe vera and Trichoderma sp. for control of Moniliophthora roreri in Theobroma cacao in Huánuco, Peru

Efecto antifúngico de Zingiber officinale jengibre, Áloe vera y Trichoderma sp. para controlar Moniliophthora roreri en Theobroma cacao en Huánuco, Perú.

R. Chochocca, 1 E. Avila, 1 J. Rojas, 1 J. Suazo, 2 A. Cruz, 13 M. Mohamed, 4

1 Universidad Peruana Unión. Lima, Perú. rociosoto@uepeu.edu.pe, elenagonzales@upeu.edu.pe, hugof@upeu.edu.pe Universidad Peruana Unión Universidad Peruana Unión Lima Peru
2 Universidad Tecnológica del Perú. Lima, Perú. julio_as_1@hotamail.com Universidad Tecnológica del Perú Universidad Tecnológica del Perú Lima Peru
3 Universidad Nacional Intercultural de la Selva Central Juan Santos Atahualpa. La Merced, Perú. alebut2@hotmail.com Universidad Nacional Intercultural de la Selva Central Juan Santos Atahualpa La Merced Perú
4 Universidad Peruana Los Andes, Perú. d.mhadi@upla.edu.pe Universidad Peruana Los Andes Universidad Peruana Los Andes Perú Peru

ABSTRACT

Theobroma cacao is the main raw material to produce chocolate, as well as for use in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries. However, Moniliophthora roreri is one of the most destructive fungal diseases and the main limiting of cacao production worldwide. Thus, this work aimed to assess the inhibitory effect of extracts of Zingiber officinale (T1) and Aloe vera (T2), and Trichoderma harzianum + Bacillus subtillis. (T3) on Moniliophthora roreri infection in Theobroma cacao; in addition, a control (T4) was also evaluated. Each treatment was applied to six plants of cacao. Incidence of monilia infection and fruit weight were monitored every 15 days (in total four periods) after the application of the treatment by spray. Significant differences (P<0.05) were found among treatments for incidence. It was observed that spraying entire cacao trees after two times (approximately 30 days) showed a reduction of monilia infection. After all periods, T1, T2, and T3 showed an incidence of monilia infection by 20.5, 17.7, and 14.9% respectively, compared to cultural control of 41.1%. This reduction of moniliasis infection translates into an increase in fruit weight average for T3 (8.4 kg), T2 (7.3 kg), and T1 (6.9 kg). In contrast, in the control (T3), the fruit weight average decreased by 5.3 kg. Biological control showed efficient management of pathogens as M. roreri. It is recommended to use such antifungal (Aloe vera) spray over at least 120 days which would decrease infection incidence even more.

Keywords:

Biological control, Moniliophthora roreri, Peru, Theobroma cacao, Fungicides.

RESUMEN

El cacao es la principal materia prima para producir chocolate, así como para su uso en las industrias alimentaria, cosmética y farmacéutica. Sin embargo, Moniliophthora roreri es una de las enfermedades fúngicas más destructivas y la principal limitante de la producción de cacao en todo el mundo. Así, este trabajo evaluó el efecto inhibidor de extractos obtenidos de Zingiber officiale (T1) y Aloe vera (T2), y Trichoderma harzianum + Bacillus subtillis (T3) en la infección producida por Moniliophthora roreri en Theobroma cacao; además, un cultivo control (T4) también fue evaluado. Cada tratamiento se aplicó a seis plantas de cacao. La incidencia de la infección por monilia y el peso de la fruta se monitorearon cada 15 días (en total cuatro períodos) después del tratamiento por pulverización. Se encontraron diferencias significativas (P<0.05) entre los tratamientos por incidencia. Se observó que la pulverización de árboles enteros de cacao después de dos veces (aproximadamente 30 días) mostró una reducción de la infección por monilia. Después de todos los períodos, T1, T2 y T3 mostraron una reducción en la infección por monilia de 20,5, 17,7 y 14,9% respectivamente, en comparación con el control cultural de 41,1%. Esta reducción de la infección por moniliasis se tradujo en un aumento del peso promedio de los frutos en T3 (8,4 kg), T2 (7,3 kg) y T1 (6,9 kg). En cambio, el control cultural (T3), el peso promedio de la fruta disminuyó a 5,3 kg. El control biológico mostró un manejo eficiente de patógenos como M. roreri. Recomendamos el uso de este tipo de antifúngicos (en especial Aloe vera) aplicados durante al menos 120 días lo que disminuiría más la incidencia de la infección.

Palabras clave:

Control biológico, Monilia, Perú, Cacao, Fungicidas.

Theobroma cacao (L.) or cacao tree is cultivated mainly in tropical areas of Latin America due to its economic and ecosystem importance (Toala et al., 2019). Traditionally, cacao seeds have been exploited for the manufacture of mainly chocolate and candies but based on their organoleptic and nutritional characteristics are used also in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries (Delgado et al., 2018; López et al., 2020).

According to the Ministry of Agriculture of Perú (MINAGRI), in Latin America, Brazil, Ecuador, Perú, and Colombia are the countries with the highest cacao production, while Costa de Marfil, Ghana, and Nigeria are the largest producers in the African continent (about 50% of world production) (MINAGRI, 2019). Peru owns 60% of the world´s cacao varieties and its production has been growing at an average annual rate of 15.6% for 10 years consecutively (MINAGRI, 2019). However, in Peru, the moniliasis is the main limiting of cacao production by reducing their production up to 40% (López et al., 2020). As consequence, many cacao fields are abandoned or replaced by other more profitable activities (Berget et al., 2021).

Cacao production worldwide is limited by fungal diseases, and it is estimated that they cause about 30% of loss and generate an economic imbalance for exporting countries (Delgado-Ospina et al., 2021). The most destructive pathogens for cacao are of the genus Moniliophthora sp., especially M. perniciosa (Dos Santos et al., 2020) and M. roreri (Bailey et al., 2018), which cause moniliasis and the witches' broom disease, both endemic and highly invasive in cacao. Moniliasis caused by M. roreri exclusively affects the cacao fruits at any stage of development and may cause losses of up 90% of production (Bailey et al., 2018). These fungi reproduce on the cobs and are dispersed by spores that come into contact with other cobs (Tirado-Gallego et al., 2016). Symptoms include bumps, premature yellowing or maturation, and oily and necrotic spots, which cause total loss of seeds or a decrease in their organoleptic quality (Joya-Dávila et al., 2015).

To control and reduce these diseases, many times farmers have preferred the application of chemicals (Tirado-Gallego et al., 2016); nonetheless, its use can generate high costs and cause serious damage to the environment, soil, and human health (Anzules-Toala et al., 2021; Torres-de-la-Cruz et al., 2019). Other types of control are cultural control (phytosanitaryness), agronomic practices, the use of biological agents (especially Trichoderma sp. Bacillus sp.) of fungus and bacteria since these are friendly to the environment and easy application (Toala et al., 2019; Villamil et al., 2016; Villamizar-Gallardo et al., 2017). For instance, Seng et al. (2014) applied Trichoderma sp. to control M. roreri in Costa Rica and reported a monilia reduction of 11% in only 35 days.

In addition, Joya-Dávila et al. (2015) used an extract of Zingiber officinale and reported from 88 to 100% control over this pathogen formation and germination. De Rodríguez et al. (2005) evaluated the inhibitory effect of Aloe vera pulp and liquid fraction on three phytopathogenic fungi (Rhyzoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Colletotrichum coccodes) isolated from a potato crop. Results showed an inhibitory effect on F. oxysporum and a reduction in the rate of colony growth. Similarly, Rosca-Casian et al. (2007) evaluated the antifungal activity of Aloe vera against four pathogenic species Alternativa viz., A. alternat, A. citri, and A. tenuissima, founding significant inhibition on growth and biomass production.

According to the Ministry of Agriculture of Peru (MINAGRI), cacao cultivation is of the largest economic importance in the province of Leoncio Prado. Nevertheless, its production in this province is affected by moniliasis between 12 to 24% (MINAGRI, 2008). Biological control is considered a promising alternative to cope with agrochemicals and plant diseases because is less costly and gives protection to the crop or fruit throughout the crop period. Likewise, their application does not cause toxicity to the plants, is safer for the environment and for the people who apply them. Thus, this work aimed to assess the inhibitory effect of extracts of Zingiber officinale, Aloe vera, and Trichoderma harzianum + Bacillus subtillis, in the incidence of Moniliophthora roreri on Theobroma cacao.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site

The study was carried out at the 14-year-old commercial cacao plantation (CCN-51) during January - February from 2021 in the Jose Crespo and Castillo district, Leoncio Prado Province, Huánuco-Peru (08°56'00"S; 76°02'30"O). The plantation was located at 540 masl, showing a tropical climate, with annual precipitation of 3179 mm, an average temperature, and relative humidity of 23.8 °C and 86%, respectively (SENAMHI, 2021).

During the study period (3 months) the maximum temperature was 34.4 °C and the average was 30.4±2.4 °C. Likewise, the minimum temperature was 19 °C and the average of 21.5±0.7 °C, average precipitation was13.4±22.3 mm with the highest values among January-February (97.7 mm day-1) (Figure 1).

Maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), and precipitation (PP) during the development of the study.

Figure 1: Maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), and precipitation (PP) during the development of the study.

Experimental design

The experiment was conducted employing a random block design (DBCA) with 4 treatments and 3 replications. The experimental area was 630 m2 with 96 plants of cacao divided into two plots. Each plot had 48 plants (6 columns with 8 plants) at 3x2 m2. Data were taken from three central plants to avoid the edge effect.

Treatments

In total, four treatments were applied; three biological treatments as fungicides: i) T1: Zingiber officinale (it was macerated, and 333 mL of juice obtained was diluted in 20 L of water), ii) T2: Aloe vera (it was carried out a mixture of 200 g of Aloe vera, 200g of paico leaves (Dysphania ambrosioides), 200 g of dried horsetail (Equisetum arvense), and 200 g of soap glycerin solid blue, all diluted in 2 L water), iii) T3: a combination (20 L total) of Trichoderma harzianum T-22 (w/v, 14 g 10 L-1 water) and a biofungicide Serenade® (Bacillus subtillis QST173 (v/v, 15 mL 10 L-1 water), and iv) T4: cultural control (nothing applied). The cultural control management was applied (sanitary pruning + removal of sick cobs) every 15 days. Treatments were applied throughout four periods in 2021: P1 (11 January), P2 (27 January), P3 (11 February), and P4 (26 February), using a nutrifield PH-B20 manually operated backpack sprayer. Sprays were delivered at a rate of 10 L min-1, wetting the entire trunk, leaves, fruits, and branches from the ground up to 3 m.

Monitoring process

Fruits were monitored for monilia infection on 6 plants; each plant may contain a number determined of cobs in the four periods: 11 (first evaluation after treatment application) and 27 in the second period in January, and 11 (third period) and 26 (fourth period) in February 2021. At each period, the fruits greater than 15 cm were assessed, considering: i) the number of healthy cobs; ii) the number of cobs affected with M. roreri; iii) the number of seeds in healthy cobs, and iv) total weight of the seeds. Before applying any treatment, it was observed that most cobs of cacao were infected by M. roreri. Thus, fruits infected totally with monilia were cut and removed, from their trees, burned, and buried to avoid their proliferation (Figure 2). Incidence (%) of cobs harvested with moniliasis were quantified using the following equation: I(%)=(CI/CH)x100. Where I(%): Percentage of fruits infected with the disease; CI: Number of infected cobs; and CH: Number total cobs harvested) (Toala et al., 2019). The total weight was calculated by weighing (kg plant-1) the grains extracted from ripe fruits harvested during the period of evaluation.

Cacao fruits: A) infected with monilia, B) Burned, and C) Buried.

Figure 2: Cacao fruits: A) infected with monilia, B) Burned, and C) Buried.

Data analysis

Data were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subsequent Tukey´s test (value of P<0.05 was significant) to compare the mean among different treatments applied. Graphs and statistical analysis were performed using R software, version 3.3.6 (R Team Core, 2019).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This study shows the inhibitory effect of three biological agents (Zingiber officinale, Aloe vera, and Trichoderma harzianum + Bacillus subtillis) for the management of moniliasis on cacao fruit in the study area. This work was carried out in the field for 3 months, where biological agents were sprayed (at each start of monitoring) on trees and fruits, and the incidence of moniliasis was monitored every 15 days.

Figure 3 shows the percentage of healthy and infected cobs by Moniliophthora roreri, evaluated at each period (P1, P2, P3, and P4) and using three biological treatments: Zingiber officinale (T1) Aloe vera (T2) and Trichoderma harzianum + Bacillus subtillis (T3), and control (T4). It was observed among the period an increase of healthy cobs and a reduction of infected cobs. For instance, T1 showed a decrease of infected cobs among periods: 51.9% (P1) to 10% (P2), 20% (P3), and 0% (P4). Likewise, in the P1 (after 15 days of evaluation and the first application of treatments) the T1, T2, T3, T4 were reported that 51.9, 38.9, 45.5, and 55.6% were still infected, respectively. In contrast, in P2 (after 30 days of evaluation and second application of treatments) for T1, T2, T3, and T4 were found that 10.0, 16.6, 0.0, and 44.4% were still infected, but showing an infectious reduction. For P3 (after 45 days of evaluation and third application of treatments) T1, T2, T3, and T4 showed cobs infected of 20, 33.3, 25, and 44.4%, respectively. Finally, P4 (after 45 days of evaluation and third application of treatments) presented cobs infected of 0.0, 6.2, 0.0, and 20% for T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. T1 and T3 after four periods of analysis number of infected cobs was eliminated. Nonetheless, T2 showed a minimal presence (6.2%) of M. roreri, and T4 (cultural control) kept almost the same number of cobs infected for all periods.

Percentage of healthy and infected cobs by Moniliophthora roreri, at each period (P1, P2, P3 and P4) and treatment (T1, T2, T3 and T4).

Figure 3: Percentage of healthy and infected cobs by Moniliophthora roreri, at each period (P1, P2, P3 and P4) and treatment (T1, T2, T3 and T4).

These results showed that the use of biological treatments for moniliasis control can reduce (T2) and eliminate (T1 and T3) the incidence of this fungal disease present in fruit cacao. Joya-Dávila et al. (2015) produced hydro-distilled Z. officinale to inhibit the moniliasis infection and reported from 88 to 100% control over their formation and incidence. Besides, Tamayo et al. (2016) also reported the effectiveness of Z. officinale on moniliasis with a reduction ranging from 40 to 50%. The antifungal or antimicrobial effect of Z. officinale corresponds to the gingerol, zingerone, and paradol (bioactive compounds) who contains high flavonoid, phytochemical, and pharmacological contents (Nortaa and Kankam, 2020). These results found in other studies are according to those carried out in this research.

Aloe vera (T2, Figure 3) as fungicide showed a decrease in moniliasis on Theobroma cacao. In the scientific literature, there is no reported information on the application of Aloe vera and its antifungal and antibacterial effect on moniliasis. However, this bio-fungicide showed successful resulted to control the inhibition of Mycosphaerella fijiensis (Jaramillo et al., 2017). Mendy et al. (2019) evaluated two types of Aloe vera extract against mycelium growth of four pathogenic fungi of papaya fruit: Fusarium sp., Aspergillus niger, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, and Lasiodiplodia theobromae, and was observed a reduction of incidence on papaya fruit after 72 h inoculation. Sitara et al. (2011) reported a complete inhibition of Drechslera hawaiensis and Atternaria alternata and partial inhibition of Penicilim digitatum when was applied Alove vera gel (0.35%). Likewise, Castillo et al. (2010) found efficacy in inhibiting mycelium growth of two common fungi: Penicillium digitatum and Botrytis cinerea when added Aloe vera gel at several concentrations.

On the other hand, Seng et al. (2014) reported monilia infection reduction by 11% in only 35 days when Trichoderma sp. (T3) was used as a spray on the entire cacao tree. This result was similar to the present findings (after 30 days). Likewise, Carvajal et al. (2015) assessed the antagonistic activity of two isolated species of Trichoderma sp. over M. roreri under field conditions and found damage reduction of 19.5 and 11.2% in only 28 days, respectively. However, significant differences among treatments were not reported.

Figure 4 shows the healthy, infected, and total of cobs studied by treatment during all periods. It is noted that the healthy cobs followed this order: T3 (Trichoderma sp., 87.3%) > T2 (80.4%1) > T1 (70.2%) > T4 (65.4%). Significant differences (P<0.05) were found among treatments. The better effect of Trichoderma sp., may be explained because this fungus is a natural antagonist of M. roreri and their species produce over 40 different metabolites capable of inhibiting several phytopathogenic microorganisms (Leiva et al., 2020).

The percentage of healthy and infected by M. roreri, monitored for each treatment.

Figure 4: The percentage of healthy and infected by M. roreri, monitored for each treatment.

The infected cobs are ordered of the following manner: T4 (34.6%) > T1 (29.8%) > T2 (19.6%) > T3 (12.7%). Significant differences (P<0.05) were found among all treatments. The control sample was less effective compared to other treatments. Toala et al. (2019) reported no control (even was observed an increase of 2% when compared to the initial and final incidence) of this disease when only a control treatment was applied.

Table 1 presents the moniliasis incidence (%) and fruit weight (kg) for each period and treatment and their average on control of M. roreri. Incidence of moniliasis average is ordered as follows: T4 (41.1%) > T1 (20.5%) > T2 (17.7%) > T3 (14.9%). Likewise, fruit weight average was: T3 (8.4 kg) > T2 (7.3 kg) > T1 (6.9 kg) > T4 (5.4%). T3 (Trichoderma sp. + Bacillus subtillis) showed better performance reducing the incidence of moniliasis and obtaining the higher fruit weight. De Sousa et al. (2021) evaluated five isolated Trichoderma spp., on seed treatment and seedling production of Theobroma cacao and found fungi incidence of 26.5% only in the control treatment, while incidence fungi was 0% for all Trichoderma isolates. Likewise, Seng et al. (2014) reported a significant reduction of incidence of monilia infection by 11%. As well, significant differences (P<0.05) were reported among incidence and fruit weight (except T1 and T2). Increasing fruit weight is probably related to better bio-fungicide control. A similar finding was reported by Trocoli et al. (2017) who reported an increase in fruit weight among 30 to 56.5% of pineapple after applying Trichoderma sp. on Fusarium guttiforme. Likewise, Siswanto et al. (2020) revealed better quality and weight of cacao beans after fruit be sprayed by biological and botanical pesticides.

Table 1: Moniliasis incidence (%) and fruit weight (kg plant-1) per period and treatment to control the disease of M. roreri.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that the use of biological fungicides decreases the incidence of moniliasis and increased fruit weight. T3 (T. harzianum + bacillus) showed better performance in decreasing moniliasis infection than T1 (Zingiber officinale) and T2 (Aloe vera). Likewise, T3 showed a higher increase in fruit weight compared to other treatments. However, Aloe vera plant should be studied to apply more different extraction methods with different concentrations to find better antifungal effects.

Acknowledgements

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Universidad Peruana Unión for the academic support.

REFERENCES

  1. Anzules-Toala V, Pazmiño-Bonilla E, Alvarado-Huamán L, Borjas-Ventura R, Castro-Cepero V and Julca-Otiniano A. 2021. Control of cacao (Theobroma cacao) diseases in Santo Domingo de los Tsachilas, Ecuador. Agronomía Mesoamericana 33(1): 45939. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v33i1.45939 [URL] 🠔
  2. Bailey BA, Evans HC, Phillips-Mora W, Ali SS and Meinhardt LW. 2018. Moniliophthora roreri, causal agent of cacao frosty pod rot. Molecular Plant Pathology 19(7): 1580-1594. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12648 [URL] 🠔
  3. Berget C, Verschoor G, García-Frapolli E, Mondragón-Vázquez E and Bongers F. 2021. Landscapes on the move: land-use change history in a mexican agroforest frontier. Land 10(10): 1066. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10101066 [URL] 🠔
  4. Carvajal JEV, Rosero SEV and Orozco WLV. 2015. Aplicación de antagonistas microbianos para el control biológico de Moniliophthora roreri Cif &Par en Theobroma cacao L. bajo condiciones de campo. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía 68(1): 7441-7450. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v68n1.47830 [URL] 🠔
  5. Castillo S, Navarro D, Zapata PJ, Guillén F, Valero D, Serrano M and Martínez-Romero D. 2010. Antifungal efficacy of Aloe vera in vitro and its use as a preharvest treatment to maintain postharvest table grape quality. Postharvest Biology and Technology 57(3): 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.04.006 [URL] 🠔
  6. De Rodríguez JD, Hernández-Castillo D, Rodríguez-García R and Angulo-Sánchez JL. 2005. Antifungal activity in vitro of Aloe vera pulp and liquid fraction against plant pathogenic fungi. Industrial Crops and Products 21(1): 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.01.002 [URL] 🠔
  7. De Sousa WN, Brito NF, Felsemburgh CA, Vieira TA and Lustosa DC. 2021. Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. isolates in cocoa seed treatment and seedling production. Plants 10(9): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10091964 [URL] 🠔
  8. Delgado-Ospina, J., Molina-Hernández, J. B., Chaves-López, C., Romanazzi, G., & Paparella, A. (2021). The role of fungi in the cocoa production chain and the challenge of climate change. Journal of Fungi 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030202 [URL] 🠔
  9. Delgado J, Mandujano J, Reátegui D and Ordoñez E. 2018. Development of dark chocolate with fermented and non- fermented cacao nibs: total polyphenols, anthocyanins, antioxidant capacity and sensory evaluation. Scientia Agropecuaria 9(4): 543-550. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2018.04.10 [URL] 🠔
  10. Dos Santos EC, Pirovani CP, Correa SC, Micheli F and Gramacho KP. 2020. The pathogen Moniliophthora perniciosa promotes differential proteomic modulation of cacao genotypes with contrasting resistance to witcheś broom disease. BMC Plant Biology 20(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2170-7 [URL] 🠔
  11. Jaramillo E, Barrezueta-Unda S, Luna E and Castillo S. 2017. In vitro evaluation of the Aloe vera gel on Mycosphaerella fijiensis, causative agent of black Sigatoka disease in Musa (AAA). Scientia Agropecuaria 8(3): 273-278. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2017.03.10 [URL] 🠔
  12. Joya-Dávila JG, Ramírez-González SI, López-Báez O and Alvarado-Gaona ÁE. 2015. Hidrodestillates antifungal effect from Zingiber officinale Roscoe on Moniliophthora roreri (Cif & Par). Ciencia y Agricultura 12(2): 21. https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.4350 [URL] 🠔
  13. Leiva S, Oliva M, Hernández E, Chuquibala B, Rubio K, García F and de la Cruz MT. 2020. Assessment of the potential of Trichoderma spp. strains native to bagua (Amazonas, Peru) in the biocontrol of frosty pod rot (Moniliophthora roreri). Agronomy 10(9): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091376 [URL] 🠔
  14. López YMC, Cunias MYR and Carrasco YLV. 2020. Peruvian cocoa and its impacto on the national economy. Revista Universidad y Sociedad 12(3): 344-352. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2218-36202020000300344&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es [URL] 🠔
  15. Mendy TK, Misran A, Mahmud TMM and Ismail SI. 2019. Antifungal properties of Aloe vera through in vitro and in vivo screening against postharvest pathogens of papaya fruit. Scientia Horticulturae 257: 108767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108767 [URL] 🠔
  16. MINAGRI. 2008. Estudio de caracterización del potencial genético del cacao en el Perú. "Proyecto de Cooperación UE-Perú En Materia de Asistencia Técnica Relativa Al Comercio - Apoyo Al Programa Estratégico Nacional Exportaciones (Penx 2003-2013)" https://www.midagri.gob.pe/portal/download/pdf/direccionesyoficinas/dgca/estudio_caracterizacion.pdf [URL] 🠔
  17. MINAGRI. (2019). Observatorio de Commodities: Cacao 2019. In Observatorio De Commodities: Cacao. https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/1488602/Commodities%20Cacao%3A%20abr-jun%202020 [URL] 🠔
  18. Nortaa KSE and Kankam F. 2020. Harnessing the therapeutic properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) for the management of plant diseases. In: Ginger cultivation and its antimicrobial and pharmacological potentials (1st ed., pp. 609-947). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90464 [URL] 🠔
  19. R Team Core. 2019. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Austria (3.2.6). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/ [URL] 🠔
  20. Rosca-Casian O, Parvu M, Vlase L and Tamas M. 2007. Antifungal activity of Aloe vera leaves. Fitoterapia 78(3): 219-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2006.11.008 [URL] 🠔
  21. SENAMHI. 2021. Boletín pronostico de riesgos agroclimáticos de cultivo de Cacao (Theobroma cacao). Servicio Nacional de Meteorologia e Hidrología del Perú. https://www.senamhi.gob.pe/load/file/04414SENA-20.pdf [URL] 🠔
  22. Seng J, Herrera G, Vaughan CS and McCoy MB. 2014. Use of Trichoderma fungi in spray solutions to reduce Moniliophthora roreri infection of Theobroma cacao fruits in northeastern Costa Rica. Revista de Biologia Tropical 62(3): 899-908. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v62i3.14059 [URL] 🠔
  23. Siswanto, Trisawa IM, Karmawati E and Suhesti S. 2020. Control of Conopomorpha cramerella, Helopeltis sp., and Phytophthora palmivora using botanical and biological pesticides. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 418(1): 0-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/418/1/012086 [URL] 🠔
  24. Sitara U, Hassan N and Naseem J. 2011. Antifungal activity of Aloe vera gel against plant pathogenic fungi. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43(4): 2231-2233. 🠔
  25. Tamayo L, Ramírez S, López O, Quiroga R and Espinosa S. 2016. Extractos por destilación de Origanum vulgare, Tradescantia spathacea and Zingiber officinale for handling of Moniliophthora roreri de Theobroma cacao. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas 7(5): 1065-1076. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342016000501065&lng=es&nrm=iso [URL] 🠔
  26. Tirado-Gallego PA, Lopera-Álvarez A and Ríos-Osorio LA. 2016. Estrategias de control de Moniliophthora roreri y Moniliophthora perniciosa en Theobroma cacao L.: revisión sistemática TT - Strategies for control of Moniliophthora roreri and Moniliophthora perniciosa in Theobroma cacao L.: A Systematic Review TT - Es. Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 17(3): 417-430. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-87062016000300009&lang=es%0Ahttp://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/ccta/v17n3/v17n3a09.pdf [URL] 🠔
  27. Toala VA, Ventura RB, Huamán LA, Castro-Cepero V and Julca-Otiniano A. 2019. Cultural, biological and chemical control of Moniliophthora roreri and Phytophthora spp in Theobroma cacao 'CCN-51'. Scientia Agropecuaria 10(4): 511-520. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2019.04.08 [URL] 🠔
  28. Torres-de-la-Cruz M, Quevedo-Damián I, Ortiz-García CF, Lagúnez-Espinoza L. del C, Nieto-Angel D and Pérez-de la Cruz M. 2019. Control químico de Moniliophthora roreri en México. Biotecnia 21(2): 55-61. https://doi.org/10.18633/biotecnia.v21i2.906 [URL] 🠔
  29. Trocoli RO, Monteiro FP, Santos PO and De Souza JT. 2017. Field applications of Trichoderma reduce pineapple fusariosis severity and increase fruit weight. Journal of Plant Pathology 99(1): 225-228. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44280592?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents [URL] 🠔
  30. Villamil JEC, Sierra LJA, Olarte YL, Mosquera ATE, Fajardo JDC, Pinzón EH and Martínez JWO. 2016. Integration of agronomical and biological practices for the management of Moniliophthora roreri Cif & Par. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas 32(2): 13. https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.153202.9 [URL] 🠔
  31. Villamizar-Gallardo RA, Ortíz-Rodriguez OO and Escobar JW. 2017. Symbiotic and endophytic fungi as biocontrols against cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) phytopathogens. Summa Phytopathologica 43(2): 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-5405/2175 [URL] 🠔