Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín
0304-2847
2248-7026
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n2.91828

Recibido: 19 de febrero de 2021; Aceptado: 1 de abril de 2021

Review on the ecophysiology of important Andean fruits: Passiflora L.

Revisión sobre la ecofisiología de frutos andinos importantes: Passiflora L.

G. Fischer, 1 D. Miranda, 1

Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. gfischer@unal.edu.co, dmirandal@unal.edu.co Universidad Nacional de Colombia Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá Colombia

ABSTRACT

The development of Andean fruit crops is viewed as an important and healthy contribution to global food consumption but ecophysiological studies on these fruit trees are scarce. 96% of approximately 520 Passiflora L. species are distributed in the Americas, especially in Colombia and Brazil. Many of these species originated on the edges of humid forests in tropical valleys. The four species: yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa Degener), sweet granadilla (Passiflora ligularis Juss.), purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. edulis Sims) and banana passion fruit (Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima (Kunth) Holm-Niels & P.M. Jørg) are widely cultivated in Colombia, and their ecophysiological findings are described in this review. The demands, in terms of temperature (°C) and altitude (masl) are, for yellow passion fruits: 15-28 °C and 0-1,300 masl; sweet granadillas: 15-23 °C and 1,800-2,600 masl; purple passion fruits: 15-22/12-14 °C (day/night) and 1,600-2,300 masl; and banana passion fruit: 13-16 °C and 1.800-3.200 masl; all of them have high requirements for solar radiation, a minimum of 7 h of sunshine per day, to encourage flowering and fruit quality. Cloudy days decrease growth, flower bud induction and flower opening. Temperature and photosynthetic active radiation are the climatic factors that have the greatest effect on plant development. Relative humidity between 60 and 80% supports effective pollination and fecundation. Passiflora L. crops do not support long periods of waterlogging, with a maximum of 4 days for yellow passion fruit. Climatic events such as prolonged rain, intense droughts, strong winds and hail are harmful for these plants.

Keywords:

Altitude, Banana passion fruit, Purple passion fruit, Solar radiation, Sweet granadilla, Temperature, Yellow passion fruit.

RESUMEN

El desarrollo de los cultivos frutales andinos se proyecta como una contribución importante y saludable para el consumo global de alimentos, pero los estudios ecofisiológicos de estos frutales son escasos. El 96% de aproximadamente 520 especies de Passiflora L. están distribuidas en las Américas, especialmente en los países Colombia y Brasil. Muchas de estas especies se originaron en los bordes de los bosques húmedos en los valles tropicales. Las cuatro especies: maracuyá (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa) granadilla (P. ligularis), gulupa (P. edulis f. edulis) y curuba (P. tripartita var. mollissima) son las más cultivadas en Colombia y de las cuales se describen hallazgos ecofisiológicos en esta revisión. Sus exigencias en temperatura (°C) y altitud (msnm) son para maracuyá: 15-28 °C y 0-1.300 msnm; granadilla: 15-23 °C y 1.800-2.600 msnm; gulupa: 15-22/12-14 °C (día/noche) y 1.600-2.300 msnm; curuba: 13-16 °C y 1.800-3.200 msnm, todas tienen altos requerimientos de radiación solar, necesitando mínimo 7 h de brillo solar por día lo que fomenta especialmente la floración y la calidad del fruto. Los días nublados disminuyen el crecimiento, la inducción de botones y apertura floral. La temperatura y la radiación fotosintéticamente activa son los factores climáticos que ejercen el efecto más grande sobre el desarrollo de las plantas. La humedad relativa entre 60 y 80% favorece una polinización y fecundación efectiva. Estos cultivos (Passiflora L.) no soportan periodos alargados de anegamiento, máximo por 4 días en maracuyá. Eventos climáticos como lluvia prolongada, sequías intensas, vientos fuertes y granizo son perjudiciales para estas plantas.

Palabras clave:

Altitud, Curuba, Gulupa, Radiación solar, Granadilla, Temperatura, Maracuyá.

INTRODUCTION

Fruits of the tropics, with their production and supply throughout the year, open up a world of possibilities to expand crops and increase exports (Blancke, 2016). Nevertheless, much is lacking for proper cultivation and understanding their agroclimatic requirements (Fischer et al., 2016). Thus, the development of Andean fruit crops is seen as an essential and healthy contribution to global food consumption (Viera et al., 2019).

Many of these "exotic" fruits are classified as important functional foods (Moreno et al., 2014; Campos et al., 2018), not only in their countries of origin but also for populations in higher latitude regions (Ramadan, 2011), resulting in an excellent export opportunity for many Andean countries, which has been increasing in volume since the beginning of this century (Moreno-Miranda et al., 2019).

The Andean region, geographically, is a mountain range, with a length of about 8,500 km, from Chile to Venezuela, passing through countries as Argentina, Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Colombia, with altitudes between 3,000 and 4,000 masl, surrounding the coastal zone of the Pacific Ocean (Guerrero et al., 2011). Its width ranges from 250 to 750 km and occupies an area of about 2'870,000 km2 (Orme, 2007). The tropical Andes represent 15% of total global plant richness, standing out as a region with very high biodiversity (Peyre et al., 2019; Campos et al., 2018), and many fruit species originate in these South American areas (Ligarreto, 2012). Izquierdo and Roca (1998) characterized this "ecoregion" as one of the most fragile and misunderstood, where more than 60 million people live, half of them working in fields and many of them have very low income.

Ecophysiology studies examine environmental effects on plant physiology (Fischer et al., 2016), describing physiological mechanisms that interact with physical and biotic environmental factors during plant growth and development (Lambers et al., 2008). This information is of the utmost importance to achieve maximum production and quality on farms, which is only possible when environmental conditions are close to optimal for a species in order to benefit its genetic potential (Pérez and Melgarejo, 2015). Studies on environmental physiology have been widely used to improve species management or to recognize differences between different varieties (Restrepo-Díaz et al., 2010).

Factors such as temperature, solar radiation, altitude, rain, wind, and air pressure are the principal factors that influence these Andean crops (Fischer and Melgarejo, 2020; Restrepo-Díaz and Sánchez-Reinoso, 2020). On the other hand, the tropics do not have the marked temperature seasons seen in temperate zones; thus, the wet and dry seasons define the seasons to which plants react physiologically (Fischer and Parra-Coronado, 2020).

In nature, ecophysiological factors act holistically (Mittler, 2006), meaning studies under controlled environments with only one or two factors are questionable, and the concept of multidimensional ecophysiology makes it difficult to compare results obtained in different areas and countries (Fischer and Orduz-Rodríguez, 2012). As such, as Restrepo-Díaz and Sánchez-Reinoso (2020) stated, the results from recent years that are being used to improve fruit tree productivity need to be reevaluated considering the effects of climate change.

Climate change will strongly affect the high Andean tropics; on the one hand, it will increase precipitation by 20-25%, and, on the other, warming in the mountain region will be more intense than in the lowlands (Marengo et al., 2011). Rain not only predominates because of climate change in the high Andean zone, but precipitation is also the climatic factor that most affects the reproductive phase of plants (73.4%), compared to the influence of air temperature in this phase (19.3%), solar radiation and photoperiod (3.2%), as shown by a study on the phenology of plants in the Neotropics by Mendoza et al. (2017). The species more affected by climate change mainly include fruits and vegetables, for which Shukla et al. (2019) warned that production and quality will decrease as warming increases, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. Carr (2013) concluded that climate change and variability have impacted growing conditions in passion fruit production regions, which may lead to changes in productivity and commercial viability in these crops. Also, Posada and Ocampo-Pérez (2013) stated that the vulnerability of these crops to climate change will depend on their adaptation capacity in accordance with the genetic plasticity of the species (ecophysiology, genotype x environment). On the contrary, there are also indications that global warming may increase production in fruit trees in some areas (Devenish and Gianella, 2012), and Tito et al. (2018) and Fischer and Melgarejo (2021) assume that a too high rise in the crops growing temperature could be avoided in the Andes by using higher altitude areas (with lower temperatures).

The development of many promising crops that have great potential in international markets is affected by a lack of knowledge on climate impacts on growth, production, and quality (Fischer et al., 2009). There are few studies on ecophysiology in Passiflora crops despite the fact that Ocampo (2013) highlighted its importance given that much of the knowledge comes from the observations of fruit growers who cultivate them in different areas of the country (Pérez and Melgarejo, 2015).

Therefore, this article aimed to collect the information on the ecophysiology of passion fruit species cultivated in the Andean region, with an emphasis in Colombia, in order to understand the climatic requirements of each crop and the effects on their physiological processes, which are key to adaptation, management and improvement of the crop.

Some ecophysiological characteristics of the higher altitude tropics

The Andean region offers growing conditions for numerous fruit species that may thrive up to 3,000 masl or more, whether they are frost-resistant crops or avoid frost during the flowering season or in recently set fruits (Fischer and Orduz-Rodríguez, 2012). For instance, in Colombia frost does not occur below 2,400 masl, and banana passion fruits are found up to an altitude of 3,200 masl (Angulo and Fischer, 1999). Solar radiation in the highlands encourages the thickening of the fruit epidermis and a greater number of parenchyma layers, and the high ultraviolet (UV) radiation results in a greater formation of antioxidants, factors that favor the quality of these fruits (Fischer et al., 2016; Fischer, 2000). Therefore, trellis systems (sistema de conducción or emparrado) are recommended in areas with excessive radiation (Fischer et al., 2009).

As thermal altitude classification confirms, temperature is the most influential climatic factor, which changes as altitude increases, with a decrease of about 0.6 °C per 100 m of elevation, mainly affecting the duration of growth cycles and the phenology of fruit trees (Fischer et al., 2009). Likewise, with an increase in altitude, the partial pressure of gases, such as O2, CO2 and N2, and air humidity decrease, along with a reduction in precipitation, from the altitude of 1,300-1,500 m (Fischer and Orduz-Rodríguez, 2012). On the contrary, these authors indicated that ultraviolet, visible, and infrared radiation increase with altitude, along with wind speed.

The leaf thickness increases, and the leaves become smaller when exposed to the UV light, which may be due to the stress caused by increasing altitude (Fischer et al., 2016). In addition, UV radiation affects the production of auxins (Fischer and Melgarejo, 2014). Buchanan et al. (2015) stated that UV light causes a lower synthesis of gibberellins in internodes, which means that high- altitude fruit trees reduce the longitudinal growth of the stem, compared to plants in the lower areas.

Passifloraceae

Rodríguez et al. (2020a) and Ocampo et al. (2021) reported that South America is the center of diversity for most cultivated Passiflora species. The high biodiversity of Passiflora in South America puts the continent as a region of great potential for utilization of these species (Hurtado-Salazar et al., 2021). There are about 520 species of passion flowers, and approximately 96% of these are distributed in the Americas, being Colombia and Brazil the centers of the diversity with 30% (Cerqueira-Silva et al., 2014). These species include herbaceous and woody vines, usually with tendrils, and a few are shrubs or trees (Ocampo et al., 2021). The species of this family are native to tropical and subtropical regions of both hemispheres and grow in low- and high-altitude habitats, where temperatures are moderate (Paull and Duarte, 2012). Ocampo et al. (2007) stated that the passion fruit plants are originated in the edges of humid forests in tropical valleys, with 20 to 30 °C average air temperature and high environmental humidity and precipitation rates but these conditions does not appear, in all cases, to be optimal for growth and production (Hurtado-Salazar et al., 2021). These are semi-perennial fruit-bearing species of a climbing habit (Primot et al., 2005).

This family, given its permanent production in the interior tropics because of its indeterminate growth habit, requires well-distributed rainfall throughout the year (Fischer et al., 2018). Jackson et al. (2010) recommended areas that are not too cold for these species, with high solar brightness and winds that are not strong. However, as these authors pointed out, regions with very hot summers decrease crop longevity, and frost below -2 °C causes severe damage to plants.

Colombia has the greatest diversity of passion fruit species (Ocampo et al., 2007), where nine species are cultivated to meet the needs of local markets and export demands (Ligarreto, 2012), with greater production in the departments of Antioquia and Huila, especially for yellow passion fruit, sweet granadilla and gulupa (Fischer et al., 2018). The species requirements for altitude and temperature vary widely. The banana passion fruit plants are well-adapted to the cold climate (Table 1).

Table 1: Origin of four important passion fruit trees cultivated in the Andean region.

In addition to these four commercially important passion fruits, Colombia has other species of great importance, such as giant granadilla "badea" (P. quadrangularis) and stone granadilla "cholupa" (P. maliformis) (Rodríguez et al., 2020b).

Yellow passion fruit

The most cultivated and well-known passion fruit species is the yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa Degener), also known as acid passion fruit; it is a product of great commercial and economic importance in Brazil, thanks to the quality of its fruits and its high industrial yield (Faleiro et al., 2020). It can be cultivated between 0-1,300 masl (Table 1), according to Fischer et al. (2009), it is the most tropical passion fruit with better adaptation to the lower marginal zone of the coffee region in Colombia.

The yellow passion fruit grows optimally in temperatures between 23 and 25 °C, while in regions with temperatures below 15 °C and a photoperiod with less than 11 h light per day, there is little flowering stimulation (Faleiro et al., 2020) (Table 2). Regions with average temperatures higher than 28 °C, accelerate vegetative growth but with a reduction in production because of dehydration of the stigmatic fluid (Fischer et al., 2009). Cleves (2012) recommended a minimum of 5 h of direct sunlight on plantations and highlighted that fruits directly exposed to the sun have a higher concentration of ascorbic acid and total soluble solids, with a thinner rind, however, growers always have to avoid sunburn damage.

Table 2: Climatic factors for the growth and production of passion fruits in Colombia (modified according to Fischer et al., 2018)

Relative humidity below 30% reduces pollination and fruit development (Faleiro et al., 2020); these very dry conditions inhibit photosynthesis by closing stomata and burning the tender shoots of plants (Fischer et al., 2009). Faria et al. (2020) irrigated yellow passion fruit seedlings with 25, 50, 75 and 100% of the capacity of the pot substrate, and found that, in 50%, the plant height and the stem diameter were very similar to those plants with greater amounts of water (up to 175%) and stated that the plants possibly have water reserves in the stem and roots. Likewise, these authors observed that the number of leaves, the transpiration and the biomass of the plants constantly increased up to 100% of the capacity of the pot substrate.

Yellow passion fruit plants do not tolerate waterlogging for more than four days, which especially affects roots and stem growth (Basso et al., 2019). As shown in Table 3, flooded yellow passion fruits increase the relative water content, but the photosynthetic and transpiration rates decrease, along with the stomatal conductance (Govêa et al., 2018; Faria et al., 2020). Nonetheless, because of the formation of an aerenchyma in the cortex of flooded plants (Govêa et al., 2018), passion fruits have mechanisms of adaptation to higher humidity conditions in the root environment for a time; thus, Faria et al. (2020) classified this fruit as moderately sensitive to water excess in the soil.

Table 3: Effect of waterlogging on the physiological response of yellow and purple passion fruits.

Sweet granadilla

In Colombia, the sweet granadilla crop (Passiflora ligularis Juss.) is the second one in species of the genus Passiflora because of its economic importance (Ocampo et al., 2015). It adapts well to elevations between 1,800 and 2,600 masl, with optimal temperatures between 18 and 20 °C (Table 1) (Miranda, 2020). Temperatures higher than 23 °C cause thermal stress, and those between 15 and 18 °C increase the duration of the production cycle but decrease the productivity (Miranda, 2012). As this author affirmed, there are problems with temperatures below this range, namely those between 12 and 15 °C, which increase the abortion of flowers, reduce fecundation, and cause cracking of recent set fruits. Rivera et al. (2002) reported that below 1,800 masl, the incidence of insect-pests increases, and smaller fruits develop. Also, below 1,500 masl, the viability of pollen is low.

In the municipality of Santa María, Department of Huila (Colombia), Fernández et al. (2014) ecophysiologically characterized sweet granadilla in situ at 2,060 masl (average temperature 17.15 °C, PAR (photosynthetic active radiation) 1,186.2 μmol photons m-2 s-1) and at 2,270 masl (16.24 °C, PAR 470.9 μmol photons m-2 s-1). At 2,060 masl, the maximum photosynthetic rate (Amax) 23.6 μmol m-2 s-1 of CO2, the darkness respiration rate (DR) 2.24 μmol m-2 s-1 of CO2 , and the compensation point per light (Ic) 34.6 μmol m-2 s-1, were higher than at 2,270 masl (17.5 Amax; 1.34 DR and an Ic of 21, respectively), while for the two locations, the foliar water potential (about -0.2 MPa), the edaphic one (about -0.01 MPa) and the predawn values of maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm; >0.86) indicated that the plants did not suffer any stress, concluding that both sites are suitable for the commercial cultivation of sweet granadilla (Fernández et al., 2014).

Among the physiological disorders of sweet granadilla, sunburn is the most important physiopathy, caused by excess solar radiation in fruits unprotected by leaves, accentuated after pruning of branches in the fruitful part of the plant or by a drought that also reduces the leaf area (Rivera et al., 2002). Fruit cracking is a physiopathy related to sudden changes in day to night temperature but can also be caused by a high Ca deficiency (Miranda, 2020), irrigation or a heavy rain after a prolonged dry season that increases the senescence of the epidermis and its extensibility (Fischer and Orduz-Rodríguez, 2012).

Regarding the water factor, a commercial sweet granadilla plantation requires rainfall between 1,500 and 2,500 mm year-1 and an atmospheric humidity of 60 to 80%, which favors the activity of pollinators, while higher humidity increases the incidence of fungal pathogens (Rivera et al., 2002; Miranda, 2020). As in other passion fruit species, water stress in the reproductive stages, from the pre-flowering stage to the filling of the fruit, causes the abscission of the floral structures and considerably reduces yield (Miranda, 2020). Likewise, this detrimental effect in the reproductive phase is related to the deficiency of nutrients, such as P, K, Ca and B. Under a moderate water stress in sweet granadilla plants generated a decrease in leaf area, number of leaves and longitudinal growth of branches, while the root/aerial ratio of the plants increased with the duration of water stress (Casierra-Posada and Roa, 2006).

According to Table 2, the light in a technical cultivation of sweet granadilla requires 1,500 to 1,600 h year-1 of sunshine (Miranda, 2020) because this luminosity highly encourages the differentiation of floral primordia, flowering and fruit coloration (Miranda, 2009).

On the other hand, excessive winds are detrimental to this passion fruit species since they affect pollination agents, bees and bumblebees, and can damage flowers and pollen germination as a result of drying of the stigmatic surface, while calm environments ensure better fruit set (Miranda, 2009).

Purple passion fruit

While Blancke (2016) confirmed that the purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis f. edulis) is cultivated not only in the subtropics but also in high Andean areas, in Colombia, Ocampo et al. (2020) reported that crops are found from 1,600 to 2,300 masl, avoiding very steep slopes, with the best results in terms of production and quality found in areas from 1,700 to 2,000 masl. Ocampo and Posada (2012) specified this as the optimal range to develop good genetic vigor, good pollination and fecundation, and low incidence of pests and diseases. Interestingly, Rodríguez et al. (2019), who studied 50 purple passion fruit genotypes at two different altitudinal locations, Pasca (Cundinamerca, 1,800 masl, 18 °C) and Susacón (Boyacá, 2,500 masl, 13.1 °C), found that the 34 landraces had a better adaptive physiological response at the higher altitude than the commercial genotypes, which is because they are more suitable for plant breeding programs in the current climate change scenario. Carr (2013) observed that the purple passion fruit can be cultivated up to 3,000 masl in the tropics.

Optimal temperatures for purple passion fruits are in the range of 15-22 °C day and 12-14 °C night (Table 2) (Pérez and Melgarejo, 2012), tolerating temperatures ranging between 10 and 24 °C (Ocampo et al., 2020). In their ecophysiological study at three different locations in Cundinamarca (Colombia), Pérez and Melgarejo (2015) concluded that climatic conditions similar to those in the municipality of Granada (2,230 masl, 15 °C), which has a day/night temperature of 18/13 °C, a vapor pressure deficit close to 0.05 kPa and radiation that does not exceed 1,000 μmol photons m-2 s-1, greatly favor the physiological performance of purple passion fruits. Temperatures over 30/25 °C day/night affect flower production (Jiménez et al., 2012); adult plants resist low temperatures but can be damaged by temperatures between -1 and -2 °C (Paull and Duarte, 2012).

Sunlight from 7 to 9 h day-1 favors fruit quality (Pérez and Melgarejo, 2012), while Ocampo and Posada (2012) stated that excessive cloudiness during fruiting delays ripening, and decreases the content of soluble solids (° Brix) and the quality of the juice. The purple passion fruit is very susceptible to changes in solar radiation because they affect the productivity of plants; thus, cloudy days decrease growth, induction of flower buds and flower opening. A reduction of light of 1-4 weeks decreases flowering and plant production. Besides, an excess radiation generates sunburning on fruits and decreases normal plant development (Jiménez et al., 2012).

Ocampo et al. (2020) recommended relative humidity (RH) between 60 and 70% for cultivation, which sustains effective pollination and fecundation, so the stigmas remain hydrated and adhesive. Rain during flowering affects the functionality of pollen because it can burst and cause abscission of flowers (Jiménez et al., 2012). Carr (2013) reported that rain up to 2 h after pollination prevents fruit set. Sánchez et al. (2013) found a negative correlation between RH and stomatal opening on a purple passion fruit plantation, but positive correlations between solar radiation and temperature with stomatal opening.

According to Ocampo et al. (2020), well-distributed rainfall between 1,800 and 2,300 mm year-1, is favorable for the growth and production of the purple passion fruit, while for the reproductive phases, i.e. between the sprouting of flower buds and fruit enlargement, water stress causes very small fruits or aborted fruits (Jiménez et al., 2012). Paull and Duarte (2012) reported that a water stress less than -1.3 MPa leads to a strong reduction in the development of the foliar area, flowering and plant yield, pointing out that the lack of water can be one of the environmental factors responsible for production fluctuations in these passion fruits.

In another purple passion fruit maypop (P. incarnata), García-Castro et al. (2017) found a moderate tolerance to short water deficit periods because of its stomatal mechanism and other non-stomatal factors (up to 10% of evapotranspiration, ET), with an exponential reduction in the photosynthetic rate with a water stress more negative than -1.0 MPa; however, the plants quickly recovered their gas exchange properties when they were irrigated again at 100% ET. Also, Crane et al. (2019) classified passion fruits as moderately water-stress tolerant plants that can withstand this stress for several days but with reduced plant growth and yield. Carr (2013) observed that the production of new leaves ceases at a leaf water potential -2.0 MPa, and the expansion of new leaves is considerably reduced to -1.5 MPa in P. edulis.

In general, the purple passion fruit, like the other passion fruits, does not resist periods of waterlogging (Crane et al., 2019); however, Chebet et al. (2020) found that mycorrhized plants (with a mixture of Glomus caledonium, G. etunicatum, Gigaspora magarita and Scutellospora sp.) better tolerate this adversity, producing more osmoprotectant proline and chlorophyll and thus, retaining their leaves and foliar N and P for longer than non-mycorrhized ones (Table 3).

Strong winds affect pollinating insects, which do not fly at high wind speeds (Fischer and Orduz-Rodríguez, 2012) and can damage flower structures and dehydrate pollen and stigma, along with damage to plantations and conduction systems (Ocampo et al., 2020).

Banana passion fruit

The banana passion fruit (Passiflora mollissima f. tripartita) is favored by altitude because UV radiation promotes the thickness of the epidermis, increasing resistance to diseases, mainly anthracnose (Campos and Quintero, 2012). There are commercial plantations between 1,800 and 3,200 masl in Colombia (Fischer et al., 2020), with the best conditions between 2,000 and 3,000 masl (Angulo, 2003). In countries such as Bolivia and Peru, there is cultivation up to 3,300 and 3,400 masl (Blancke, 2016; National Research Council, 1989). Mayorga et al. (2020) studied banana passion fruits at altitudes of 2,498 and 2,006 m in Pasca (Cundinamarca, Colombia), observing that, in the higher altitude, larger fruits were formed, with higher levels of citric and ascorbic acid but with less total soluble solids (°Brix), and recorded temperature and photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) as the climatic factors that exerted the greatest effect on plant development. To resist large fluctuations in temperature and high radiation (UV) in high Andean zones, plants develop soft hairs on the entire vegetative part (Angulo and Fischer, 1999). Sunlight between 1,300 and 1,600 h year-1 are necessary to guarantee favorable growth and production conditions for plants (Angulo, 2003).

This species is the commercial passion fruit most adapted to cold tropical and subtropical regions (Blancke, 2016). Mayorga et al. (2020) established the base (minimum) temperatures for the growth of primary branches, flower buds and fruits as 4.3, 3.1 and 0.01 °C, respectively. Zones with temperatures between 13 and 16 °C are recommended for cultivation, but temperatures below 0 °C can affect flower buds, flowers, fruit set and non-lignified vegetative parts of the plant (Campos and Quintero, 2012). Given that this fruit grows at altitudes higher than the frost limit, P. mollissima f. tripartita lines have formed tolerance to temperatures of -5 °C for a short time (National Research Council, 1989).

Rainfall of 1,000 to 1,500 mm year-1, well-distributed throughout the year, is optimal for commercial crops (Fischer et al., 2009); therefore, supplying moisture in dry periods with artificial irrigation is necessary, especially in the reproductive phases. Climatic events such as prolonged rain (waterlogging), intense droughts and hail can affect the cultivation and production of plants (Fischer et al., 2020). Campos and Quintero (2012) recommended a relative humidity between 70 to 80%, which favors pollination and pollen germination; considering that drier airs increase the risk of frost in the high Andean zone, while a higher atmospheric humidity benefits some diseases, especially anthracnose. Light winds facilitate the transport of pollen through the air and the flight of pollinating insects, which are necessary since the banana passion fruit is an allogamous plant. Strong winds must be controlled by planting windbreak barriers using native plants (Fischer et al., 2020) that also protect against flower fall (Angulo, 2003).

The cultivation of passion fruit plants in Colombia reveals a positive impact of plastic roofing oriented over the plant rows with a PE plastic (175 µm thickness) 1.50 m wide, which is placed on a "T" type structure located at 2.2 m above the ground. This structure protects the plants from heavy rains and direct solar radiation and regulates the circulation of air inside the canopy, reducing relative humidity. These factors improve the production and quality of the fruits and contribute to reduce the incidence of critical fungal diseases, such as Alternaria sp. and Cladosporium sp. Nevertheless, the use of this technique is still scarcely reported since it is necessary to carry out physiological studies of these crops that explain the variables of yield and quality of the fruit production.

CONCLUSIONS

The temperature requirements for the studied passion fruit species are, generally, between 15 and 23 °C; only the banana passion fruit requires a temperature range between 13 and 16 °C. For altitude requirements, the yellow passion fruit is the most "tropical" species, growing at the elevations between 0 and 1,300 masl, and the banana passion fruit is the most "Andean" one, which is found between 1,800 and 3,200 masl.

Sufficient solar radiation and PAR are crucial for flower induction and flowering, while a relative humidity between 60 and 80% favors pollination and fecundation.

Sweet granadilla and purple passion fruit plants require precipitations rates between 2,300-2,500 mm year-1. On the other hand, a new technology consisting in the plastic cover placed over the rows of purple passion fruit plants protects the plants against heavy rains and the fruits against direct sunlight. This technology allows for a lower incidence of pests and diseases and, therefore, provides a higher fruit quality and production; however, there is a lack of studies to understand better these beneficial effects.

These crops are moderately sensitive to waterlogging, having a resistance mechanism of aerenchyma and, on the other hand, the mycorrhizal plants better tolerate this abiotic stress. The passion fruit plants withstand a moderate water shortage; however, very dry conditions at reproductive stages, starting from the pre-flowering up to the fruit filling, cause the abscission of the floral structures and can considerably reduce the yield.

In addition to hailstorms, strong winds are very harmful to Passiflora plants, since affect the activity of pollinating insects and can damage flower structures and dehydrate pollen and stigma along with the damage produced to plantations and conduction systems.

The current climatic variability affects the physiology of plants and orchards and requires the implementation of new agronomic practices for special management of the temperature and precipitation effects.

REFERENCES

  1. Angulo R. 2003. Frutales exóticos de clima frío. Bayer Crop Science S.A., Bogotá. 136 p. 🠔
  2. Angulo R and Fischer G. 1999. Los frutales de clima frío en Colombia. La curuba. Ventana al Campo Andino 2(2): 24-28. 🠔
  3. Basso C, Rodríguez G, Rivero G, León R, Barrios M and Díaz G. 2019. Respuesta del cultivo de maracuyá (Passiflora edulis Sims) a condiciones de estrés por inundación. Bioagro 31(3): 185-192. 🠔
  4. Blancke R. 2016. Tropical Fruits and Other Edible Plants of the World. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, UK. 337 p. 🠔
  5. Buchanan BB, Gruissem W and Jones RL. 2015. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, UK. 1280 p. 🠔
  6. Campos D, Chirinos R, Gálvez L and Pedreschi R. 2018. Chapter Eight - Bioactive potential of Andean fruits, seeds, and tubers. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 84: 287-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2017.12.005 [URL] 🠔
  7. Campos T. and Quintero OC. 2012. Curuba (Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima). pp. 421-442. In: Fischer G. (ed.). Manual para el Cultivo de Frutales en el Trópico. Produmedios, Bogotá. 1023 p. 🠔
  8. Carr MKV. 2013. The water relations and irrigation requirements of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims): A review. Experimental Agriculture 49(4): 585-596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479713000240 [URL] 🠔
  9. Casierra-Posada F and Roa HA. 2006. Efecto del déficit hídrico moderado en el suelo sobre el crecimiento y distribución de materia seca en granadilla (Passiflora ligularis Juss). Revista U.D.C.A. Actualidad & Divulgación Científica 9(2): 169-180. 🠔
  10. Cerqueira-Silva, CBM, Jesus ON, Santos ESL, Corrêa RX and Souza AP. 2014. Genetic breeding and diversity of the genus Passiflora: Progress and perspectives in molecular and genetic studies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15: 14122-14152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150814122 [URL] 🠔
  11. Chebet D, Kariuki W, Wamocho L, Rimberia F. 2020. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on growth, biochemical characteristics and nutrient uptake of passion fruit seedlings under flooding stress. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 16(4): 24-31. 🠔
  12. Cleves JA, Jarma AJ and Puentes GA. 2012. Maracuyá (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa y f. purpurea L.). pp. 682-700. In: Fischer G (ed.). Manual para el Cultivo de Frutales en el Trópico . Produmedios, Bogotá. 1023 p. 🠔
  13. Crane JH, Balerdi CF and Schaffer B. 2019. Managing your tropical fruit grove under changing water table levels. Document HS957. Horticultural Sciences Department, UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL, USA. 🠔
  14. Devenish C and Gianella C. 2012. 20 years of Sustainable Mountain Development in the Andes ‐ from Rio 1992 to 2012 and Beyond ‐ Consorcio para el Desarrollo Sostenible de la Ecorregión Andina ‐ CONDESAN, Lima. 🠔
  15. Faleiro FG, Junqueira NTV, de Jesus ON, Cenci SA, Machado CF, Rosa RCC, Costa AM, Junqueira KP and Junghans TG. 2020. Maracuyá: Passiflora edulis Sims. pp. 15-29. In: Rodríguez A, Faleiro FG, Parra M and Costa AM (eds.). Pasifloras - especies cultivadas en el mundo. ProImpress-Brasilia, Brazil and Cepass, Neiva, Colombia. 249 p. 🠔
  16. Faria LO, Souza AGV, Alvarenga FP, Silva FCM, Junior JSR, Amorim VA, Borges L.P. and Matos FS. 2020. Passiflora edulis growth under different water regimes. Journal of Agricultural Science 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n4p231 [URL] 🠔
  17. Fernández G, Melgarejo LM and Rodríguez N. 2014. Algunos aspectos de la fotosíntesis y potenciales hídricos de la granadilla (Passiflora ligularis Juss.) en estado reproductivo en el Huila, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas 8(2): 206-216. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2014v8i2.3214 [URL] 🠔
  18. Fischer G. 2000. Ecophysiological aspects of fruit growing in tropical highlands. Acta Horticulturae 531: 91-98. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.531.13 [URL] 🠔
  19. Fischer G, Casierra-Posada F and Piedrahíta W. 2009. Ecofisiología de las especies pasifloráceas cultivadas en Colombia. pp. 45-67. In: Miranda D, Fischer G, Carranza C, Magnitskiy S, Casierra F, Piedrahíta W and Flórez LE. (eds.). Cultivo, poscosecha y comercialización de las pasifloráceas en Colombia: maracuyá, granadilla, gulupa y curuba. Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, Bogotá. 358 p. 🠔
  20. Fischer G and Melgarejo LM. 2021. Ecophysiological aspects of guava (Psidium guajava L.). A review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas 15(2): e12355. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2021v15i2.12355 [URL] 🠔
  21. Fischer G and Melgarejo LM. 2020. The ecophysiology of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) - an Andean fruit crop. A review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas 14(1). https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2020v14i1.10893 🠔
  22. Fischer G and Melgarejo LM. 2014. Ecofisiología de la uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.). pp. 31-47. In: Carvalho CP and Moreno DA. (eds.). Physalis peruviana: fruta andina para el mundo. Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo - CYTED, Limencop SL, Alicante, Spain. 229 p. 🠔
  23. Fischer G, Melgarejo LM and Cutler J. 2018. Pre-harvest factors that influence the quality of passion fruit: A review. Agronomía Colombiana 36(3): 217-226. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v36n3.71751 [URL] 🠔
  24. Fischer G and Orduz-Rodríguez JO. 2012. Ecofisiología en los frutales. pp. 54-72. In: Fischer G. (ed.). Manual para el Cultivo de Frutales en el Trópico . Produmedios, Bogotá . 1023 p. 🠔
  25. Fischer G and Parra-Coronado A. 2020. Influence of environmental factors on the feijoa (Acca sellowiana [Berg] Burret) crop. A review. Agronomía Colombiana 38(3). https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v38n3.88982 [URL] 🠔
  26. Fischer G, Quintero OC, Tellez CP and Melgarejo LM. 2020. Curuba: Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima y Passiflora tarminiana. pp. 105-121. In: Rodríguez A, Faleiro FG, Parra M and Costa AM. (eds.). Pasifloras - especies cultivadas en el mundo. ProImpress-Brasilia, Brasil, DF, Brazil and Cepass, Neiva, Colombia. 249 p. 🠔
  27. Fischer G, Ramírez F and Casierra-Posada F. 2016. Ecophysiological aspects of fruit crops in the era of climate change. A review. Agronomía Colombiana 34(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n2.56799 [URL] 🠔
  28. García-Castro A, Volder A, Restrepo-Díaz H, Starman TW and Lombardini L. 2017. Evaluation of different drought stress regimens on growth, leaf gas exchange properties, and carboxylation activity in purple passionflower plants. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Sciences 142(1): 57-64. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS03961-16 [URL] 🠔
  29. Govêa KP, Neto ARdC, Resck NM, Moreira LL, Júnior VV, Pereira FL, Polo M and Souza TC. 2018. Morpho-anatomical and physiological aspects of Passilora edulis Sims (passion fruit) subjected to flooded conditions during early developmental stages. Biotemas 31(3): 15-23. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2018v31n3p15 [URL] 🠔
  30. Guerrero AL, Gallucci S, Michalijos P and Visciarelli SM. 2011. Países Andinos: aportes teóricos para un abordaje integrado desde las perspectivas geográfica y turística. Huellas 15: 125. 🠔
  31. Hurtado-Salazar A, Ceballos-Aguirre N and Ocampo-Pérez J. 2021. Chapter 3. Ecophysiology and grafted fruit quality in Passiflora species. pp. 101-136. In: Hurtado A, Ocampo J, Ceballos-Aguirre N, García D.J. and López WR. (eds.). Passiflora: Genetic, grafting and biotechnology approaches. Nova Science Publisher, New York. 🠔
  32. Izquierdo J and Roca W. 1998. Under-utilized Andean food crops: status and prospects of plant biotechnology for the conservation and sustainable agricultural use of genetic resources. Acta Horticulturae 457: 157-172. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.457.20 [URL] 🠔
  33. Jiménez Y, Carranza C and Rodríguez M. 2012. Gulupa (Passiflora edulis Sims.). pp. 579-599. In: Fischer G. (ed.). Manual para el Cultivo de Frutales en el Trópico . Produmedios, Bogotá . 1023 p. 🠔
  34. Lambers H, Chapin III FS, Stuart F and Pons TL. 2008. Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New York. 605 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3 [URL] 🠔
  35. Ligarreto G. 2012. Recursos genéticos de especies frutícolas en Colombia. pp. 35-53. In: Fischer G. (ed.). Manual para el cultivo de frutales en trópico. Produmedios, Bogotá . 1023 p. 🠔
  36. Marengo JA, Pabón JD, Díaz A, Rosas G, Ávalos G, Montealegre E, Villacis M, Solman S and Rojas M. 2011. Climate change: evidence and future scenarios for the Andean region. pp. 110-127. In: Herzog S, Martinez R, Jorgensen PM and Tiessen H. (eds.). Climate change and biodiversity in the tropical Andes. IAI-SCOPE-UNESCO, Paris. 🠔
  37. Mayorga M, Fischer G, Melgarejo LM and Parra-Coronado A. 2020. Growth, development and quality of Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima fruits under two environmental tropical conditions. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 93(1): 66-75. https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2020.093.00X [URL] 🠔
  38. Mendoza M, Peres CA and Morellato LPC. 2017. Continental-scale patterns and climatic drivers of fruiting phenology: A quantitative Neotropical review. Global Planetary Change 148:227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.12.001 [URL] 🠔
  39. Miranda D. 2009. Manejo integral del cultivo de la granadilla (Passiflora ligularis Juss.). pp. 121-157. In: Miranda D, Fischer G, Carranza C, Magnitskiy S, Casierra F, Piedrahíta W and Flórez LE. (eds.). Cultivo, poscosecha y comercialización de las pasifloráceas en Colombia: maracuyá, granadilla, gulupa y curuba . Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, Bogotá . 358 p. 🠔
  40. Miranda D. 2012. Granadilla (Passiflora ligularis Juss.). pp. 550-578. In: Fischer, G. (ed.). Manuel para el cultivo de frutales en el trópico. Produmedios, Bogotá . 1023 p. 🠔
  41. Miranda D. 2020. Granadilla: Passiflora ligularis Juss. pp. 65-103. In: Rodríguez A, Faleiro FG, Parra M and Costa AM. (eds.). Pasifloras - especies cultivadas en el mundo . ProImpress-Brasilia, Brasil, DF, Brazil and Cepass, Neiva, Colombia. 249 p. 🠔
  42. Mittler R. 2006. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends of Plant Science 11: 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002 [URL] 🠔
  43. Jackson D, Thiele G, Looney N and Morley-Bunker M. 2010. Temperate and subtropical fruit production. 3rd ed. Cabi Publishing, Wallingford, UK. 336 p. 🠔
  44. Moreno-Miranda C, Moreno-Miranda R, Pilamala-Rosales AA and Molina-Sánchez JI. 2019. The fruit and vegetable sector in Ecuador: Main socio-productive characteristics of the agri-food network of Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana). Ciencia y Agricultura 16(1): 31-55. https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.v16.n1.2019.8809 [URL] 🠔
  45. Moreno E, Ortiz BL and Restrepo LP. 2014. Contenido total de fenoles y actividad antioxidante de pulpa de seis frutas tropicales. Revista Colombiana de Química 43(3): 41-48. https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.colomb.quim.v43n3.53615 [URL] 🠔
  46. National Research Council. 1989. Lost crops of the Incas. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 415 p. 🠔
  47. Ocampo J. 2013. Diversidad y distribución de las Passifloraceae en el departamento de Huila en Colombia. Acta Biológica Colombiana 18(3): 511-516. 🠔
  48. Ocampo J, Arias JC and Urrea R. 2015. Colecta e identificación de genotipos élite de granadilla (Passiflora ligularis Juss.) en Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas 9(1): 9-23. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2015v9i1.3742 [URL] 🠔
  49. Ocampo JA, Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge G, Restrepo M, Jarvis A, Salazar M and Caetano C. 2007. Diversity of Colombian Passifloraceae: biogeography and an updated list for conservation. Biota Colombiana 8: 1-45. 🠔
  50. Ocampo J, Hurtado-Salazar A and López WR. 2021. Chapter 1. Genetic resources and breeding prospects in Passiflora species. pp. 1-76. In: Hurtado A, Ocampo J, Ceballos-Aguirre N, García D.J. and López WR. (eds.). Passiflora: Genetic, grafting and biotechnology approaches . Nova Science Publisher, New York . 🠔
  51. Ocampo J and Posada P. 2012. Ecología del cultivo de la gulupa (Passiflora edulis f. edulis Sims). pp. 29-32. In: Ocampo J and Wyckhuys K. (eds.). Tecnología para el cultivo de la gulupa en Colombia (Passiflora edulis f. edulis Sims). Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia. 🠔
  52. Ocampo J, Rodríguez A and Parra M. 2020. Gulupa: Passiflora edulis f. edulis Sims. pp. 139-157. In: Rodríguez A, Faleiro FG, Parra M and Costa AM. (eds.). Pasifloras - especies cultivadas en el mundo . ProImpress-Brasilia, Brasil, DF, Brazil and Cepass, Neiva, Colombia. 249 p. 🠔
  53. Orme AR. 2007. The tectonic framework of South America. In: Veblen TT, Young KR and Orme AR. (eds). The physical geography of South America. Oxford University Press. 448 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195313413.003.0008 [URL] 🠔
  54. Paull RE and Duarte O. 2012. Tropical fruits. Vol. 2. Second edition. CABI International, Wallingford, U.K. 371 p. 🠔
  55. Pérez LV and Melgarejo LM. 2015. Photosynthetic performance and leaf water potential of gulupa (Passiflora edulis Sims, Passifloraceae) in the reproductive phase in three locations in the Colombian Andes. Acta Biológica Colombiana 20(1): 183-194. https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v20n1.42196 [URL] 🠔
  56. Pérez LV and Melgarejo LM. 2012. Capítulo 1 - Caracterización ecofisiológica de la gulupa (Passiflora edulis Sims) bajo tres condiciones ambientales en el departamento de Cundinamarca. pp. 11-32. In: Melgarejo LM. (ed.). Ecofisiología del cultivo de la gulupa (Passiflora edulis Sims). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá. 🠔
  57. Peyre G, Balslev H, Font X and Tello JS. 2019. Fine-scale plant richness mapping of the Andean páramo according to macroclimate. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7: 377. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00377 [URL] 🠔
  58. Posada, P and Ocampo-Pérez J. 2013. Zonificación agroclimática e impacto del cambio climático futuro en el cultivo de granadilla (Passiflora ligularis Juss.) en Colombia. pp. 89-92. In: Memorias Congreso Latinoamericano de Pasifloras. Vol. 1. Cepass, Neiva, Colombia. 🠔
  59. Primot S, Rioux V, d'Eeckenbrugge GC, Garcin F and Ocampo JA. 2005. Variación morfológica de tres especies de curubas (Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima, Passiflora tarminiana y Passiflora mixta) y sus híbridos en el Valle del Cauca. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 27(3): 467-471. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452005000300030 [URL] 🠔
  60. Ramadan MF. 2011. Bioactive phytochemicals, nutritional value, and functional properties of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana): An overview. Food Research International 44: 1830-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.042 [URL] 🠔
  61. Restrepo-Díaz H, Melgar JC and Lombardini L. 2010. Ecophysiology of horticultural crops: an overview. Agronomía Colombiana 28(1): 71-79. 🠔
  62. Restrepo-Díaz H and Sánchez-Reinoso AD. 2020. Chapter 5 - Ecophysiology of fruit crops: A glance at its impact on fruit crop productivity. Fruit crops: Diagnosis and management of nutrient constraints. 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818732-6.00005-8 [URL] 🠔
  63. Rivera B, Miranda D, Ávila L and Nieto A. 2002. Manejo integrado del cultivo de la granadilla Passiflora ligularis Juss. Editora Litoas, Manizales, Colombia. 132 p. 🠔
  64. Rodríguez NC, Melgarejo LM and Blair MW. 2019. Purple passion fruit, Passiflora edulis Sims f. edulis, variability for photosynthetic and physiological adaptation in contrasting environments. Agronomy 9: 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9050231 [URL] 🠔
  65. Rodríguez N., Ambachew D, Melgarejo LM and Blair MW. 2020a. Morphological and agronomic variability among cultivars, landraces, and genebank accessions of purple passion fruit, Passiflora edulis f. edulis. HortScience 55(6): 768-777. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14553-19 [URL] 🠔
  66. Rodríguez A, Faleiro FG, Parra M and Costa AM. 2020b. Pasifloras especies cultivadas en el mundo. ProImpress Brasília, DF, Brazil and Cepass, Neiva, Colombia. 249 p. 🠔
  67. Sánchez C, Fischer G and Sanjuanelo DW. 2013. Stomatal behavior in fruits and leaves of the purple passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) and fruits and cladodes of the yellow pitaya [Hylocereus megalanthus (K. Schum. ex Vaupel) Ralf Bauer]. Agronomía Colombiana 31(1): 38-47. 🠔
  68. Shukla PR, Skea J, Slade R, Van Diemen R, Haughey E, Malley J, Pathak M and Portugal Pereira J. 2019. Technical summary. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2019/11/03_Technical-Summary-TS.pdf [URL] 🠔
  69. Tito R, Vasconcelos HL and Feeley KJ. 2018. Global climate change increases risk of crop yield losses and food insecurity in the tropical Andes. Global Change Biology 24(2): 592-6011. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13959 [URL] 🠔
  70. Viera W, Sotomayor A and Viteri P. 2019. Breeding of three Andean fruit crops in Ecuador. Chronica Horticulturae 59(4): 20-29. 🠔