Feature
The 7th
International Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Conference
(EBLIP7): Conference Commentaries and Reflections
2013.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 2.5 Canada (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ca/),
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial
purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the
same or similar license to this one.
Rick Stoddart,
Assessment Librarian, Oregon State University Libraries & Press,
Oregon State University, USA
Can you
have a crush on a methodology? Well, I am little embarrassed to say I left the
University of Saskatchewan quite enamoured with evidence based library and
information practice. As an assessment librarian, I am attracted to all aspects
of librarianship that elegantly bridge library practice and evidence based
decision making. The EBLIP7 conference was definitely jam packed with this sort
of smartly done librarianship. Each conference presentation, lightning talk,
and poster session incorporated the beauty of evidence based practice with
library content such as instruction, space planning, outreach, and research
methodologies. The conference program itself was also spiced with verve and
pluck especially in the Poster Madness and Lightning Strikes sessions.
Likewise, let’s not forget about whimsy and mischief at the Evidence Based
Hootenanny either. These events keep the conference lively like the bubbles in
a glass of champagne. What was not to love about EBLIP7?
The
keynote by Denise Koufogiannakis was quite inspirational and I took away her
framework for the differing types of evidence and discussion of an amended
evidence based model for librarianship to share with my colleagues. I attended
presentations about the intersection of evidenced based practice and librarian
research agendas, virtual reference, library leadership, and student
performance. Librarian research agendas and virtual reference were particularly
timely topics for my library, and I gained some new perspectives in these areas
to put to use right away when I returned home.
Personally,
I was encouraged that EBLIP7 was inclusive of librarians of all stripes,
including medical, public, school, and academic librarians. I guess I am not
the only librarian charmed by the potential of evidence based practices to
influence effective decision-making in libraries. I was grateful for the opportunity
the conference afforded to network with other assessment librarians. I think
one of my most important takeaways was being able to build deeper connections
between library assessment and evidence based library and information practice.
Lorie Kloda’s lightning strike session the last day really helped put the
library assessment puzzle piece into the overall evidence based librarianship
picture.
Generally,
there was a lot of energy and camaraderie at EBLIP7 that was certainly
contagious throughout the conference. I definitely left Saskatoon excited about
the idea of evidence based practices in libraries. I attribute this ongoing
conference enthusiasm to the planning and efforts of Virginia Wilson, the
conference chair, and the rest of the conference planning committee. Continued
kudos on a conference well done!
Perhaps
it is the lingering buzz from the cheaply priced beer at the Evidence Based
Hootenanny or the sugar rush from the Saskatoon berry pie at the ribbon cutting
ceremony at new Centre for Evidence Based Library & Information Practice,
but let it be known that EBLIP7 was a blast, and I can’t wait for the next one.
Daniel Hsieh, Princeton Junction, New Jersey,
USA
I attended EBLIP7 in
July, 2013 at University of Saskatchewan (UofS) as a delegate’s companion and
stayed in the campus dormitory. The selection of the UofS as the conference
site was an excellent choice. The campus is so beautiful and the university offers
the perfect infrastructure for a conference. The simple lifestyle on campus was
interruption-free, which helped me focus on what I wanted to accomplish: I
finished writing the major part of my scientific manuscript during my stay in
the dormitory.
EBLIP7 organizers
arranged two exciting tours for the delegate’s companions: one was a visit to a
local brewing company and the other a visit to the famous Canadian Light Source
synchrotron at the UofS. As a chemical engineer working in the pharmaceutical
industry, I found these tours very interesting and educational.
Tasting all kinds of
beer was the first step of visiting the local brewery. Fortunately after this
tasting event, I was still fully awake. All kinds of grains suitable for the
beer making process were displayed at the entrance, which were also available
for purchase by local beer makers. The basic tools and recipes for beer making
were also displayed to help us understand the beer making process. One
interesting part of this process is the liquid seal associated with the
fermentation reactor.
This liquid seal has
two functions: first, this seal prevents
oxygen from getting into the fermentation process, because oxygen will ruin the
taste of the beer. Second, this seal can be used as an indicator of the end of
fermentation process. During beer making, carbon dioxide is produced as a
product and can escape from the fermenter through the liquid seal. When the
fermentation process is complete, no carbon dioxide will bubble through the
seal. This signals the end of the fermentation process and the beer is almost
ready to be harvested.
A senior research
scientist at the Canadian Light Source introduced us to the famous Canadian
synchrotron—an excellent introduction on how the moving particles are generated
at a speed close to light speed and how the synchrotron can be applied to real
life. I was particularly impressed with two amazing applications: the
identification of the origin of diamond from extremely low levels of mineral
impurities, and the reason why arthritis is so painful. This is because there
are numerous tiny spikes from the bone at the joints penetrating into skin.
These kinds of spikes cannot be detected using regular X-rays, but they can be
observed from the results generated using the synchrotron.
During the conference,
we had a chance to attend a food festival in downtown Saskatoon, a Taste of
Saskatchewan, where we also enjoyed a live concert. On the way back to the
university, we walked along the South Saskatchewan River, a beautiful view.
The arrangements for
EBLIP7 were excellent and I brought back a souvenir given by EBLIP7, a book
entitled Prairie Dreams, which
contained photographs from photographer Courtney Milne. The photos in this book are a fond reminder
of my trip to Saskatoon.
Iffat Ahmad, University
Library, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
I work at the
University Library, University of Saskatchewan, and this year I was a delegate
at the EBLIP7 Conference hosted by the University Library. I was able to attend
this conference as a recipient of the Marjorie Clelland scholarship. This is an
annual scholarship created in the memory of a highly respected colleague who is
no longer with us. With her dedication and hard work, Marjorie Clelland left a
legacy that inspires us to continue to better ourselves. The scholarship in her
name annually allows library staff to attend a conference related to academia
and library work. Upon being awarded this scholarship, I gladly chose to attend
a conference right here at the University of Saskatchewan.
I attended a variety
of sessions on a broad range of topics that were both interesting and
informational. The papers presented covered subjects such as copyright as it
relates to EBLIP, as well as noise control in libraries. All of the presenters
were knowledgeable and enjoyable to listen to. I truly felt that all of the
sessions were well worth attending. I cannot stress enough what a fun
experience it was to attend EBLIP7 here at my place of work.
Having never been a delegate at a conference, I enjoyed the novelty of being
one. It gave me a new perspective of the University – as viewed by a visitor to
the campus.
This gave me a new
appreciation as to what a truly beautiful campus it is. Having never attended a
conference before, I had nothing to compare it to. However, I am in agreement
with fellow delegates who said that is was incredibly efficient and smoothly
run. Virginia Wilson, her organizing team, and the many volunteers and session
facilitators did a splendid job in ensuring that EBPLI7 was a huge success.
Sandra Stubbs, University of the West Indies
Mona, Western Jamaica Campus, West Indies
The Caribbean was
represented by four librarians, all from the University of the West Indies
(UWI), including the University Librarian from the St. Augustine Campus in
Trinidad and Tobago, and the Campus Librarian from the Mona Campus of UWI in
Kingston, Jamaica.
I previously attended EBLIP6 in 2011 in Manchester, England,
and a Conference of the Association of Caribbean University Research and
Institutional Libraries (ACURIL) in 2010 in the Dominican Republic. At the
latter, the conference was themed around evidence based library and information
practice, and presentations were led by some of the chief proponents of EBLIP,
and so I was eager to investigate how colleagues worldwide had embraced and
advanced the evolving concepts and models of evidence based discussion and
application in libraries.
I was not disappointed. The opening keynote address by Dr.
Denise Koufogiannakis, entitled “What we talk about when we talk about evidence,” set an excellent tone for EBLIP7. She
discussed the evidence based practice movement with its origins in the field of
medicine, to what is meant by evidence in the context of library and
information practice and how such evidence might be utilized in practical ways
to inform decision making. She spoke of four types of evidence, namely
anecdotal, causal, expert, and experiential, and then examined categories of
hard versus soft evidence. This was especially useful for those who were still
trying to understand the paradigms and models in what is now commonly known as
to as the international EBLIP movement.
In making selections
of sessions to attend from the many concurrent choices available, I was happy
to be able to participate in presentations of research and discussions of
current practice in my areas of interest, including noise management in
libraries, copyright, virtual reference, prevailing versus ideal research
environments, and changes in academic library space. As expected, the poster
sessions were very informative. A number of poster presenters incorporated the
useful facility whereby participants were able to use our mobile devices to
scan the posters for instant access to both the presented and additional
information via their online Web pages.
Evadne McLean and Sandra Stubbs from Jamaica
in foreground
My Caribbean
colleagues and I especially enjoyed the Lightning Strikes, which saw presenters
very creatively presenting evidence based projects in the allotted time of just
five minutes each. These strikes were much more engaging and information filled
than one might anticipate. Audience reactions and applause underscored their
utility. Congratulations to all presenters and the organizing committees for
this and the successful staging of the entire conference.
Venue Appreciation
The venue chosen for
EBLIP7 was picturesque. I was among the EBLIP7 delegates who chose
accommodation in the halls of residence on the beautiful campus of the
University Saskatchewan. This afforded walking access to the conference
sessions, which were all held at the Campus.
I was particularly fascinated with the rocks in the permanent exhibition
displayed in the Geology Building.
Hospitality was
superb. The generosity of the people of Saskatoon carried over into all social
programmes. I don’t remember going to a conference before where the consensus
among attendees was that we were perhaps overfed.
Centre for Evidence Based Library &
Information Practice
During the conference
we were pleased to be part of the historic opening of the Centre for Evidence
Based Library & Information Practice in the Murray Library. This function
included a ribbon-cutting ceremony (followed by lunch) with University Library
Dean Vicki Williamson officiating.
Social Programmes
Part of what makes
conferences memorable is the opportunities to engage with the local and
international populace outside of the conference setting, and to explore parts
of the host city. I had an enjoyable bus ride into the country side and back to
the Barn Playhouse for an event that was dubbed “Evidence Based Hootennany” and
yes, it did include lots of wine, food (with too much dessert personally prepared by the Chair of the local
organizing committee), barn dancing, prizes, and surprises!
A Taste of Saskatchewan & Kiwanis Park
A group of us joined Saskatoon librarians from the organizing committee
on a very enjoyable walk along the river to the event dubbed “Taste of
Saskatchewan”. This was the 18th anniversary of this festival, held
in the beautiful Kiwanis Park. As a Kiwanian, I was especially excited to visit
this memorial park and observe the many monuments, pavilions, fountains, statues and information
billboards showcasing historical Saskatoon and world events. This park is
located between the Broadway Bridge and the University Bridge on the banks of
South Saskatchewan River.
The Taste of Saskatchewan Festival featured over 30 of Saskatoon’s finest
restaurants serving their favourite dishes, including entrees, desserts, and
speciality items. My EBLIP7 colleagues and
I rocked and danced to music of live bands in performance and basked in the
atmosphere. The Festival was said to be featuring over 55 of Saskatchewan’s
premier bands and performers.
Overall, the conference was thoughtfully
organized with relevant information available throughout from courteous
volunteers at the Information Desk. I look forward to using and sharing
valuable information garnered from the many sessions attended with my
Colleagues in the West Indies and beyond.
Cheers!
Saskatchewan Hall
Crystals on display in
the Geology Building
Participants at the
opening ceremony of
Centre for Evidence
Based Library & Information Practice
Participants liming
outside the Barn Playhouse ahead of post-dinner activities
Sharon Murphy, Head, Academic Services
Division, Queen’s University Library, Kingston, ON, Canada
As my plane touched
down in Saskatoon on July 15th I was greeted with a tornado warning.
Welcome to the prairies, and welcome to the 7th International
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Conference! The meteorological
tornado never occurred but the intellectual and social burst of energy started
from day one and continued building throughout the conference. Lest my metaphor
be taken in any negative connotation, I have to add that this was one positive
storm of energy.
My first foray into
the EBLIP community was two years ago at the University of Salford during the 6th
EBLIP conference. Little was my understanding of evidence based librarianship
at that time, and I felt like I had stumbled in as a visitor from a strange and
foreign land, i.e., from librarianship outside of the health sciences. The
EBLIP community welcomed me then and continues to inform and inspire me now. So
the opportunity to attend this year, in a sister Canadian university, was
irresistible.
Reviewing my notes as
I prepared to write this reflection reminded me that every session I attended
was a stimulating presentation of solid research – truly, every single session.
I participated in sessions on copyright, fines, citation management, citation
data analysis, scholarly communication, system dynamic modeling,
action-learning for writing, leadership development, and assessment. Certainly
the scope of research shows how EBLIP is an approach to understanding and
practicing librarianship and not a discipline specific pursuit. I’m only sorry
I missed other brilliant presentations – such is the conundrum of concurrent
sessions.
We did all get to
enjoy the posters, keynotes, and socializing. The posters alone were worth the
price of admission and had the most brilliant introductions I have ever
witnessed during Poster Madness. We were enticed to view the posters by the
creators giving introductions that included skits, costumes, dialogues and
singing – yes indeed, thank you, Laura Newton Miller! The opening keynote was
especially thoughtful, with Denise Koufogiannakis enlarging our understanding
of what we mean by evidence and how we use it as we work together. I think
about that a lot in my own work.
There were many
assessment librarians in attendance and I wandered around musing aloud about
the relationship between assessment and EBL. Lorie Kloda took up that question
in her Lightning Strikes contribution. She gave us a very useful
conceptualization of the relationship between the two (no spoiler alert needed
here as I will wisely leave it to Lorie to elaborate, which I’m sure she will).
Well, no great
conference experience is really great without community and fun. I was nineteen
years old the last time I stayed in residence and have judiciously avoided it
ever since (I loved it when I was 19, but as one gets older…). However, my
EBLIP stay in residence turned out to be an unexpected highlight. The
University of Saskatchewan campus is beautiful and residence was a place to
visit and to get to know colleagues from Canada and all over the world. I
especially loved our breakfast gabs all together in the “caf”. Of course this brings to mind the joyous and
delicious banquet on a prairie farm under that prairie sky.
This was my first
visit to Saskatoon and I will be back. It was fun to get to know the city and
to get to know colleagues from around the globe. With Maria Grant from Salford,
I roamed the city and perused the galleries after the conference closed. I will
certainly travel again to Saskatoon and hope for the opportunity to experience
another EBLIP conference.
Thank you to all who
made it happen, I can hardly wait for the next one!
Jon Eldredge, Associate Professor, University
of New Mexico, USA
To the best of my
knowledge, I believe that I am one of only two people who have participated in
all seven EBLIP conferences to date. Each EBLIP conference has showcased its
own local attractions and has provided a window into regional practices.
Each EBLIP conference,
beginning with the first in Sheffield, has offered its own memorable elements.
Sheffield during 2001 featured the promise of a dramatic evidence-based
revolution within our profession. Edmonton in 2003 opened the movement beyond
the boundaries of the health sciences, where it had derived much of its initial
inspiration. Edmonton brought in academic, school, and public library
representatives.
Brisbane during 2005
suggested the codification of EBLIP and announced the birth of this peer
reviewed journal. Then North Carolina brought many US colleagues on board to
our international movement during 2007. North Carolina also featured the
perspectives of research faculty members charged with training future members
of our profession.
Stockholm offered a
distinct turning point of EBLIP toward a genuine international movement rather
as primarily an English-language-centered series of conferences. The Nordic
countries demonstrated their sophisticated perspectives on EBLIP at this 2009
conference, and contributed a vision of integrating EBLIP as a team-centered
pursuit into mainstream practice.
EBLIP6 brought this
biennial conference to Salford near Manchester, not far from the first-ever
conference hosted in Sheffield. The conference was held during 2011 on the
Salford University campus with hotel accommodations distributed around
Manchester. The program emphasized an applied research focus and multiple
perspectives on the future of EBLIP. Attendees enthusiastically cheered on the
poster madness innovation.
How shall EBLIP7
during July 15-18, 2013 be remembered? I will recall it in a most unexpected
way. I arrived almost two days early to complete a research project and begin a
manuscript far away from the distractions of my office. EBLIP7 offered
on-campus lodging in the dorms so I elected to stay in a dorm room instead of a
hotel separated by some distance from the on-campus conference venue. Others
also arrived early to attend pre-conference workshops or to relax away from
their offices.
When I left EBLIP 7
the research project and the manuscript were still in the same incomplete
state. Instead, I felt invigorated by my interactions with the many other
conferees who also had stayed in the dorm and who had eaten at the adjacent
dining hall. During our time together on campus we created a community of EBLIP
enthusiasts. We talked on the lawns, while walking around the beautiful
University of Saskatchewan campus or throughout the city of Saskatoon, at late
night eateries, more conventional restaurants, in the hallways, and in the
dining halls. The conversations almost always were stimulating. Some
conversations catalyzed me to pursue new directions in EBLIP. I recall one
breakfast dining hall discussion in which no one wanted to stop in order to
attend the formal program. The late night hallway conversations about EBLIP in
the dorms examined some underlying assumptions and introduced us to interesting
variations of EBLIP at other types of libraries.
Library conferences
often take place at large hotel conference centers. In contrast, many
specialized academic societies in the USA sponsor their conferences on
university campuses with attendees housed in dormitory housing. There is
something about communal living in this kind of smaller conference context that
many other conferees and I obviously found to be very stimulating. Based on the
positive experiences at EBLIP7, I would recommend that all future EBLIP
conferences use campus venues to foster the same kinds of informal discussions
and networking. Such communal conference living could very well expand and
strengthen our international EBLIP community.
Each EBLIP conference
gets better and better. The organizing committee made all of us comfortable and
fully entertained throughout EBLIP7. I find it increasingly difficult to choose
between the tantalizing presentations at different concurrent EBLIP sessions.
That trend continued at EBLIP7. I found the presentation by Pors and Johannsen
about the diffusion of findings from systematic reviews in the mass media, for
example, to be an intriguing research direction worth pursuing in other
countries. The poster madness program, once again, provided informative and
entertaining presentations such as one sung to the theme of “Yesterday” and
another presented as a cheer exercise.