GENERAL DEMANDS CONCERNING THE LATE COVENANT: Propounded by the Ministers and Professors of Divinity in Aberdene, to some Reverend Brethren, who came thither to recommend the late Covenant to them, and to those who are committed to their charge. TOGETHER WITH The ANSWERS of those Reverend Brethren to the said DEMANDS. AS ALSO The REPLIES of the foresaid Ministers and Professors to their ANSWERS. 1 Pet. 3.15, 16. Sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear: Having a good conscience, that whereas they speak evil of you, as of evil doers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ. Printed by ROBERT YOUNG, His Majesty's Printer for Scotland. Anno 1638. IT will, no doubt, seem strange to see my name in print, standing so near these men who are Interlocutors in the succeeding pages, their profession and mine being of such different natures; But I shall entreat the ingenuous reader to take notice of the necessity of this my doing. I am by the three Answerers to these Demands wronged, and that by an injury of an high nature, challenged in writing to have done that, which God doth know never entered into my thoughts; and for any thing the answerers did or do know, never came into my mind. And though by the law of challenges, they having challenged me, I may choose the weapons (which certainly should have been in another kind, had the challengers been of another profession) yet being men of so holy a function, I have thought good to make choice of their own weapons; and by my pen to do out that blot, which they by their pen have laid upon me. And I have thought it fit to do it in a schedule annexed to this book (which for that cause only I have caused to be here reprinted) that where men's minds perhaps may be poisoned by swallowing an untruth in their answers, so deeply wounding my honour and loyalty; this antidote might be ready at hand to cure them, before they should be fully tainted with it: As likewise supposing that if they should be printed severally, many might meet with their answers alone, which might leave in them a bad impression of me; if they should not be attended with this just and true expression of mine. The injuries wherewith I am violated by the three answerers, are of two sorts: One of them strikes me alone, as his sacred MAJESTY'S high Commissioner; The other wounds me as his MAJESTY'S Counsellor; and with me all of that honourable board. The former is this, They deliver affirmatively, That the declaration which they tendered me of their late Covenant, was such as I accepted, and was well pleased with. And this they set down twice for failing; In their answer to the first demand towards the end, and in their answer to the third demand a little before the middle of it; and that with such confidence, as truly I cannot with any justice blame the reader for believing of it, when it fell from the pens of these men, whose profession is the teaching of truth. But I shall desire the readers to suffer themselves (notwithstanding the prejudice of these men's persons) to be undeceived by a plain averment of truth. I am confident none of these three answerers ever heard me say so, nor will they say they did. If they but heard it from others (which I do verily believe they did not, and shall do so still, till they avouch their authors) sure no man can choose but miss in them that civil prudence, which will not allow any discreet man to affirm that of any other; much less of a person of my quality, and at this time of my place; the foundation whereof shall be so frail and slippery, as report, which is always uncertain, and most times false. For clearing the truth, I do aver upon mine Honour that I never said so, I never thought so. And though that that Declaration was much bettered by the industry of some well affected (from what was first intended) yet it gave me not satisfaction: and I dare boldly affirm, I never said it would give my Master the KING'S MAJESTY any. My justifiers in this, shall be these Noblemen, Gentlemen, and others to whom I ever spoke, either publicly, or in private. I was indeed content to catch at any thing I could, when I could not obtain what I would; as being willing to do my countrymen that respect, as to the utmost of my power to recommend to my gracious Master, with all favourable construction, even that which I then thought, and did know fell short of just and home satisfaction. † Nor is there any ground for their opinion of my acceptation of that declaration, unless they call receiving, accepting; and that was not in my power to refuse, it being conceived in formal words of a supplication, and so tendered to me, who by my royal Master his instructions was commanded to receive the petitions of all his good and loyal subjects. And here, I do confess, I cannot charge it for a faulty mistake upon the readers of these asseverations of the three answerers, if they should, before this my declaration, conceive that his MAJESTY were in all probability like to rest satisfied with that declaration of the Covenant; having it delivered to them from men whom they have in all this business believed as much as themselves, that his MAJESTY'S Commissioner, who in all likelihood did know his MAJESTY'S mind best, did rest satisfied with it. But his MAJESTY hath just reason to charge me, if these asseverations were true; as I have good reason to vindicate myself, they being not true. The truth is, if these asseverations be true, I do profess to the whole world, that his MAJESTY hath a most just cause to discharge himself of me, and my service, and to discharge me of all trust in this, or any other negotiation For I profess, that I knowing his MAJESTY'S constant mislike of the said Covenant, it must bewray in me, either breach of trust, or want of judgement; if I should go about to make either myself, or the world believe, that my Master could receive satisfaction by such an explanation. And here I cannot dissemble, but must ask leave to vent myself thus far. Had these wrongs been put upon me by the pens of other men, and not of these whose professions I am forward and willing to believe (because I would have it so) will not suffer them to embrace wilful and malicious designs: I should justly have doubted, that there had been some men in this kingdom, who being afraid of a settling and peaceable conclusion of this business, had gone about to raise in my royal and gracious Master a jealousy of my slackness in my King and Country's service, that so I might be called back, re infecta. If any such enemies there be to the peace of this miserable distracted Church and State, I beseech God in time to discover them, and that all may end, in covering them with shame and confusion. The sum of all I will say of this personal wrong offered to myself, is this; If these reverend and learned Gentlemen, the Answerers, in these untrue aspersions intended any harm to me, I shall only now requite them with a cast of their own calling; I pray God forgive them. If they intended me no harm, than I do expect that they will give myself and the world satisfaction, in clearing me that I gave them no ground for these their asseverations. And so being confident of his MAJESTY'S goodness to all his ministers; amongst the rest, to the meanest of them, myself, especially in this particular, that he will never be shaken in the opinion of my loyal and constant service, upon such slight, light, and groundless reports: I will say no more of that first point. For that which concerneth myself as a Counsellor, and the rest of that honourable Board, averred by the three answerers, in their answers to the third and fourteenth demand; I do here protest before Almighty God, that none of the allegations alleged by the three answerers, nor any petition given me by the supplicants, moved me to give way, that the order of the Council table should not pass into an act: for I did then, and do now avow, that I then was, and now am fully satisfied with his MAJESTY'S most gracious declaration; and that in my opinion all aught to have thought themselves sufficiently freed from fears of innovations. But the true reason was this, I was so tenderly affectioned towards the peace of my Country, that I gave way to that, which many of honourable quality assured me, if it were not done, a present rupture might follow, and so consequently the ruin of this Kingdom; which I was resolved to keep off so long as possibly I could, retaining my fidelity to my Master. Which care of mine I find but slenderly required, when it is made an argument to persuade his MAJESTY'S good subjects to do that which is so displeasing to him, and so unsafe for them. And yet even in this passage, it would have been expected from men of that profession, that nothing should have passed but undoubted truth. In which point too they have failed, either as I hope by a mistaking, or a mis-informing. For the Missive once thought fit to be sent to his MAJESTY was never rend, but remaineth yet as it was: and we did not send it, because we did not think, thanks to his MAJESTY would be seasonable in the name of the whole Kingdom, when we knew his MAJESTY, by the last proceedings of many, and protestations made against his royal declaration (pretended in the name of the whole country) could not receive satisfaction. To conclude, notwithstanding this personal wrong offered to me his MAJESTY'S high Commissioner, I will carefully; cheerfully, and constantly go on with this great business, wherewith he hath entrusted me. Which as I pray God that it may prosper under my hands; so I praise God that he hath given me so cheerful and willing a heart to go on in it; that if my life could procure the peace of this torn Church and Kingdom, to the contentment of my royal Master, and comfort of his distracted subjects; he who knoweth all things, knoweth likewise this truth; It is the sacrifice of the world, in which I would most glory, and which I would most sincerely offer up to God, my King and Country. HAMILTON. GENERAL DEMANDS CONCERNING THE LATE COVENANT: Propounded by the Ministers and Professors of Divinity in Aberdene, to some Reverend Brethren, who came thither to recommend the late Covenant to them, and to those who are committed to their charge. TOGETHER WITH The ANSWERS of those Reverend Brethren to the said DEMANDS. AS ALSO The REPLIES of the foresaid Ministers and Professors to their ANSWERS. 1 Pet. 3.15, 16. Sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear: Having a good conscience, that whereas they speak evil of you, as of evil doers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ. Printed by ROBERT YOUNG, His Majesty's Printer for Scotland. Anno 1638. GENERAL DEMANDS CONCERNING THE LATE COVENANT; Together with Answers to them, and Replies to those Answers. THE FIRST DEMAND. BY what power, or warrant, these our Reverend brethren can suit of us, or of our people, subscription to this late Covenant; not being sent by his Majesty, or by the Lords of Council, nor by any national Synod of this Kingdom, nor by any judicatory established in it? And, How they can enforce upon us, or upon our people, who are no ways subject unto them, their interpretation of the articles of the negative confession? In respect whereof, as also in respect of that band of mutual defence against all persons whatsoever, this late Covenant is substantially different from that which was subscribed by the King and his subjects, Anno 1580. and 1581. ANSWER. WE are not come hither to usurp the authority of any civil or spiritual judicatory, or to enforce upon our reverend Brethren, and the people committed to their charge, the subscription of the late Covenant, or the interpretation of the Articles of that Confession which is called negative, or whatsoever else of that kind: but are sent to represent unto them, in all humility, the present case and condition of this kirk and kingdom; crying for help at their hands also: and, in brotherly love, to exhort and entreat, that they will be pleased to contribute their best endeavours, for extinguishing the common combustion, which by joining with almost the whole kirk and kingdom in the late Covenant, we trust they may lawfully do, without prejudice to the King's Majesty, or to any lawful judicatory, or to that Confession of faith above mentioned: Since the sound interpretation and application thereof, to the errors of our times, can make no substantial change, and the band of mutual defence, wherein we oblige ourselves, To defend the true religion, and the King's Majesty's person, and authority, against all persons whatsoever, is joined, at first, with the Confession of faith. Like as his Majesty's Commissioner objecting, That our Covenant was suspect to be an unlawful combination against Authority, and to be the main hindrance of obtaining our desires, hath accepted, and was well pleased with our Declaration; bearing, That we have solemnly sworn, to the uttermost of our power, with our means and lives, to stand to the defence of the King's majesty as of God's Vicegerent, set over us, for the maintenance of Religion, and ministration of Justice. REPLY. WE have, Reverend Brethren, sufficiently considered and examined your answers to our Demands, by which we expected full satisfaction to all our scruples and doubts concerning the late Covenant: But truly, in modesty and brotherly love, we tell you, that your answers (whatsoever you think of them yourselves) have not given us that satisfaction which we expected. We know that some who rashly condemn every thing which is said or written contrary to the cause which they maintain, will boldly say of us, that we have closed our eyes against a clear and ingyring light: But first, we say with JOB, Our witness is in heaven, and our record is on high. That Lord who only seeth the secrets of hearts, knoweth, that we love his truth, and are ready, so soon as it shall be shown unto us, to embrace and profess it before the world. Next, we appeal to the consciences of all impartial readers, who shall have occasion to weigh and consider maturely the weight of our arguments, and of these answers which it hath pleased you to give us: wishing them, yea, most humbly and earnestly entreating them, to judge both of your writings and ours without prejudice, or any partial respect. Yea, we are confident, that ye also, of whose love to the truth of GOD we are persuaded, will after better advisement, and more mature consideration of the matters debated, acknowledge that we are not against the truth, but for it. The Lord open your eyes, that you may clearly see that truth for which we stand. WE objected to you, Reverend Brethren, that you had not a calling to urge us to the subscription of the late Covenant, from any acknowledged authority, or lawful judicatory established in this Church or Kingdom: to which objection ye answer not here particularly, as we expected. And whereas you say, That you are come to exhort us, and our people, in all humility, to join with you; How is it, that without our consent, and against our will, not having lawful authority, which you seem here not to acclaime to yourselves, you have publicly preached to our people, within our Congregation? which is a thing repugnant to those places of Scripture, in the which the Spirit of God recommendeth to Elders, or Pastors, the care of those flocks, over which the holy Ghost hath made them overseers, Acts 20.28. 1 Pet. 5.2. as also telleth us, That the Pastors whom the flock must know, and to whom they must submit themselves, do watch over the souls of that flock, and must give account for them, 1. Thessal. 5.12. Hebr. 13.17. It is also contrary to the laws of the Christian Church in all ages. For by the ancient Canons, Pastors are commanded to contain themselves within the limits of their own charge; and not to presume to exercise Pastoral office in another Pastor's Diocese, or Parioch, without leave: As also, they forbid Pastors to receive to divine service any man of another Parioch, that cometh in contempt of his own Pastor. Concil. Nicen. 1. Oecum. 1. Can. 16 Concil. 2. Oecum. Constantinop. Can. 2. Concil. Carthag. 2 Can. 11. Concil. Carthag. 3. Can. 20. Concil. Chalced. Oecum. 4. Can. 13. Concil. Nicen. 2. Can. 10. Concil. Tribur. Can. 28. Concil. Nannet. Cap. 1. & 2. ¶ 2. We did not without reason say, That you, and others of your confederation, enforce your interpretation of the Negative confession upon others; seeing we hear, that some Pastors and Prelates are forced to flee to foreign countries, for fear of their lives, because they have refused the said interpretation; and those who have stayed in the country, dare scarcely appear in the high ways, or streets; and are threatened, That their stipends shall not be paid unto them, until they subscribe your Covenant. ¶ 3. Whereas you do in brotherly love exhort, and entreat us to contribute our best endeavours, for extinguishing the common combustion; we praising God for your pious zeal, and for the lovingness and modesty of your speeches, (wherein by God's help we shall labour to keep correspondence with you; that both we and you may show ourselves to have learned of Christ, Meekness, and lowliness of heart) we most willingly promise to do so, by all means which our consciences will permit us to use; as also to join our most humble and hearty prayers with yours, That it may please God in this dangerous exigent, To do good in his good pleasure to our Zion, and to build up the walls of our jerusalem. ¶ 4. We may justly say, That this new Covenant is substantially different from the old, which was made Anno 1581. in respect it not only containeth that old covenant, or confession, which was allowed by two general assemblies, but also your interpretation of it, which, as yet, hath no such authority, or approbation. ¶ 5. No band of mutual defence, against all persons whatsoever, is expressed in the Covenant made 1581. And although it were, yet the case is very unlike: For subjects may make such a Covenant of mutual defence by arms, with the consent of the King, who only under God, hath the power of arms, or of the sword, in this kingdom. But they who made this late Covenant, had not his consent, as that former or old Covenant had: which is a thing so evident, that no man can call it in question. ¶ 6. As for that which you affirm here, That my Lord Commissioner his Grace was well satisfied with your declaration; it becometh not us to pry narrowly into his Grace's doings: but truly we have more than reason to pry most narrowly into the words of a Covenant, which is offered unto us, to be sworn, and subscribed, left we abuse, and profane the sacred name of God, and tie ourselves to the doing of any thing which is displeasing unto him. Last of all; whereas ye desire us to join ourselves to you, and to the rest of your confederacy, who are (as you affirm) almost the whole Church and Kingdom: Truly we cannot but reverence such a multitude of our reverend brethren▪ and dear countrymen, and are ready to be followers of them, in so far as they are followers of Christ: But neither can we do any thing against the truth, neither can we attribute so much authority to their multitude, as otherwise we would, in respect there hath been so much dealing for subscriptions, in all quarters of this Kingdom, and so many have been threatened, to give their consent, as we are most credibly informed. THE II. DEMAND. WHether or no we ought to subscribe the foresaid covenant, seeing all covenants of mutual defence, by force of arms, made amongst subjects of any degree, upon whatsoever colour or pretence, without the King's Majesty or his Successors privity and consent, are expressly forbidden by King JAMES of blessed memory, and the three Estates of this Kingdom, in the parliament holden at Linlithgow, Anno. 1585.? ANSWER. THe act of Parliament forbiddeth in the first part, leagues and bands of maintenance privily made, such as are called bands of Manrent, as the act in Queen Mary's time, to which it hath relation, doth bear. And in the second part, only such, as tend to the public disturbance of the peace of the Realm by moving sedition. But no act of Parliament doth discharge, nor can any just law forbid, Conventions, or Covenants in the general; or such Covenants in special as are made with God, and amongst ourselves; not for any man's particular, but for the common benefit of all; not to move sedition, but to perserve peace, & to prevent trouble: which by all probability had been to many, before this time, too sensible, if this course had not been taken. Conventions and Covenants (in the judgement of Jurisconsults) are to be esteemed and judged of, according to their divers ends, good or bad: which made King James of happy memory to take it for an undoubted maxim, That pro aris & focis, & pro patre patriae, the whole body of the Commonwealth should stir at once: not any more as divided members, but as one consolidate lump. REPLY. IN that second part of that act of Parliament, holden at Linlithgow, Anno 1585. are forbidden, All leagues or bands of mutual defence, which are made without the privity and consent of the King, under the pain to be holden and execute as movers of sedition and unquietness, etc. Wherefore we can no ways think, that any bands or leagues of mutual defence, by force of arms, are there permitted, (that is, not forbidden) seeing first the words of the act are so general: for in it are discharged All bands made amongst subjects of any degree, upon any colour whatsoever, without his Highness, or his Successors privity and consent had and obtained thereunto. Next, all such bands are declared to be seditious, and perturbative of the public peace of the Realm: or, which is all one, are appointed to be esteemed so. And therefore, we cannot see how any bands of that kind can be excepted, as if they were not seditious. 2. We doubt not, but the late Covenant, being considered according to the main intention of those pious and generous Gentlemen, Barons, and others our dear countrymen, who made it, especially our reverend brethren of the holy ministry, is a Covenant made with God, and proceeding from a zealous respect to God's glory, and to the preservation of the purity of the Gospel in this Church and Kingdom: But we cannot find a warrant in our consciences to grant, That such Covenants, in so far as they import mutual defence, against all persons whatsever, none being excepted, no, not the King, (as it seemeth unto us, by the words of your Covenant, but far more by the words of your late Protestation, the 28 of june; wherein you promise mutual defence against all external or internal invasion, menaced in his Majesty's last Proclamation) are not forbidden by any band, nor justly yet can be forbidden. For first, we have already shown, That they are forbidden in the foresaid act of Parliament, Anno 1585. 2. No warfare; and consequently, no covenant, importing warfare, is lawful, without just Authority; which, we are persuaded, is only in the supreme Magistrate, and in those who have power and employment from him, to take arms: yea, so far as we know, all moderate men, who duly respect Authority, will say, That it is so in all Kingdoms, and Monarchies, properly so called: (of which nature is this his Majesty's most ancient Kingdom) And, that it is altogether unlawful to subjects in such Kingdoms, to take arms against their Prince. For which cause, that famous and most learned Doctor Rivetus, in a late Treatise called jesuita vapulans, speaking of the judgement of Buchanan, and others, who taught, That subjects might take arms against their Prince, in extraordinary cases, and extreme dangers of the Religion, and Commonwealth; professeth first, That he, and all other Protestants, condemn such doctrine. Secondly, That this error did proceed from a mistaking of the government of the Scotish Kingdom, as if it were not truly and properly Monarchical. Thirdly, That the rashness of those writers, is to be ascribed partly to the hard and perilous times of persecution, wherein they lived, and partly, Scotorum praefervido ingenis, & ad audendum prompto. Thus he writeth in the 13. Chap. of the said book, Pag. 274. and 275. answering to the Recrimination of a jesuit, who had affirmed, That Buchanan, Knox, and Goodman, had written as boldly for the rebellion of Subjects against Princes, as any of their order at any time had done. A thing much to be noted by us at this time, lest we any more give that advantage to Jesuits, to make Apology for their rebellious doctrines and practices. 3. Not only making of Covenants, but also all other actions, are to be esteemed and judged of, first, by the equity of the subject, and matter; then, by the end: for if the matter pactioned (that is, which the parties mutually do promise) be justly forbidden, by a lawful Authority, and consequently be unlawful in itself; then the goodness of the end, or project, cannot make the paction, or Covenant, to be good, or lawful. THE III. DEMAND. IF it be alleged, That in extreme and most dangerous cases, such acts of Parliament may be contraveened; Quaeritur, Whether there be now such extreme case, seeing we have his Majesty, in his former Proclamations, avowing, protesting, declaring, and in this last Proclamation taking God to witness, that he never intended any innovation of Religion; and also seeing he hath removed already all that which made men fear novations, to wit, Service book, book of Canons, and the alleged exorbitancy of the new high Commission. ANSWER. IF the removing of the Service book, book of Canons, and the limitation of the vast power of the high Commission, containing so much superstition, and tyranny of Prelates, be a benefit to this Kirk and Kingdom, we ought, under God, to ascribe the same to the peaceable meetings, humble supplications, and religious covenanting of the subjects; which have given information to his Majesty, and have procured from his justice and goodness so great favour, as is thankfully acknowledged in the last Protestation: which doth also express the many particulars, wherein his Majesty's late Proclamation is not satisfactory. And therefore the Lords of his Majesty's privy Council, upon the supplication and complaint of his Liege's, were moved to rescind the act of the Approbation of the foresaid Proclamation, and to rend the subscribed Missive, which was to be sent therewith to his Majesty. We are confident, that the Declaration wherewith his Majesty's Commissioner was so well pleased, will also give satisfaction to our reverend brethren; and that they will not think it convenient for them to give further approbation to the Proclamation, than the Council hath done, although all of us aught, with thankfulness, to acknowledge his Majesty's benignity. REPLY. WE will not here dispute what hath been the main or principal cause moving his sacred Majesty to discharge the Service book, and other things which occasioned the present perturbation of our Church; nor yet whether or not his Majesty's proclamation may give full satisfaction to all the fears and doubts of his subjects. For ourselves, we profess, that upon his Majesty's declaration, and gracious promise contained in his Majesty's last proclamation, we believe, first, That his Majesty never intended innovation in religion: Secondly, That he will maintain the true Protestant religion, all the days of his life: which we pray God to continue long. Thirdly, That all acts made in favours of the Service book, etc. are discharged. Fourthly, That he will never urge the receiving of the Service book, Book of Canons, etc. nor any other thing of that nature, but by such a fair and legal way, as shall satisfy all his subjects. And thence we do collect, that which we affirmed before, to wit, That there is no such extraordinary or extreme case, as might give occasion to subjects to make such a band, as is directly forbidden by the foresaid act of parliament, and to contraveen it in such a manner, as may seem to import a resisting of Authority by force of arms. THE FOUR DEMAND. COncerning that interpretation of the negative confession, which is urged upon us, and wherein the articles of Pearth, and Episcopacy, are declared to be abjured, as well as all the points of Popery, which are therein expressly and distinctly mentioned; Quaeritur, Who are the interpreters of that confession? that is, Whether all the subscribers, or only those Ministers convened in Edinburgh, in the end of February, who set it down? If all the subscribers; then what reason have we to receive an interpretation of that confession from laics, ignorant people, and children? If only those Ministers convened then in Edinburgh; then seeing no man should take an honour to himself, but he who is called of God, as Aaron, Heb. 5.4. what power and authority had they over their brethren, to give out a judicial interpretation of these articles of faith, and to enforce their interpretation of these articles upon them? ANSWER. THe subscribers are here misinterpreted in two points, very material: One is, that they presume upon power, or authority, which they have to give out a judicial interpretation of the articles of the confession, and to enforce the same upon others: whereas they only intended to make known their own meaning, according to the mind of our Reformers; and in charity to propound and recommend the same to others, who might be made willing to embrace it: Although it be true also, that very great numbers of Ministers were convened, and testified their consent as that time: And although the private judgement of those who are called laics, ought not to be mis-regarded. For it is confessed, That an interpretation, which is private ratione personae, may be more than private, ratione medii. The other, which being observed, will answer divers of the following demands, That the articles of Pearth, and of Episcopal government, are declared to be abjured, as points of Popery, or as Popish novations: where as the words of the Covenant put a difference betwixt two sorts of novations: one is of such as are already introduced in the worship of God, and concerning those, whatsoever be the judgement of the subscribers, which to every one is left free, by the words of the Covenant, they are only bound to forbear the practice of them, by reason of the present exigence of the Kirk, till they be tried, and allowed in a free General assembly. The other sort is of such novations, as are particularly supplicated against, and complained upon; as the Service book, and Canons, etc. which are abjured, as containing points of Popery. And this we avouch, from our certain knowledge, to be the true meaning of the controverted words of the Covenant. And therefore humbly entreat, That no man any more, upon this scruple, withhold his testimony. REPLY. AS for the first of these two mistake: If you have not given out that interpretation of the negative confession judicially, but only have made known your own meaning, according to the mind of the Reformers, as you allege; then, first, your interpretation hath no obligatory power over others; and consequently you ought not to obtrude your interpretation upon us, more than we do our interpretation thereof upon you. Neither ought any man to be molested, or threatened, for not receiving your interpretation; chiefly seeing all who are of your confederation have so solemnly vowed, and promised, to be good examples to others of all godliness, soberness, and righteousness, and of every duty which you owe to God and man. Secondly, As for the mind or judgement of our Reformers, we know no evidence of it, having public authority to oblige the subjects of this Kingdom, except that which is expressed in our national confession of faith, ratified in Parliament twenty years before the negative confession was penned: wherein we find no warrant or ground of such interpretation as you bring. Thirdly, The interpretation of the negative confession, set down in your covenant, as it is not public, ratione personae, so also not ratione medii: for it hath no warrant, for aught we could ever perceive, either from the word of God, or from the testimony of the ancient Church, or from the consent of other reformed Churches, or from our national confession, registrated in Parliament. As for the second mistaking, or misinterpretation of the words of the late covenant, first, we marvel, that a general Covenant appointed to be subscribed by all, learned and unlearned, should have been set down by you in such ambiguous terms. For, truly, all men here, even the most judicious, do so take your words, as if the articles of Pearth were in them abjured. 2. We have again more attentively examined the words of the late Covenant, and do evidently perceive by them, That in the said Covenant, the articles of Pearth, and Episcopacy, are condemned, and abjured, as erroneous, and damnable corruptions. For where you profess, and before God, and his angels, and the world, solemnly declare, That you shall labour, by all means lawful, to recover the liberty, and purity of the Gospel, as it was established and professed before the foresaid novations: We ask you, what is that period of time, to which your words have reference, when you promise to labour, to recover the purity and liberty of the Gospel, as it was professed and established before the foresaid novatitions? If you mean that period of time, when the Service book, and Book of Canons were urged upon you; to wit, the last year bypast in Summer; than you acknowledge, That all that time you enjoyed the purity and liberty of the Gospel; and consequently, That you yet enjoy it; for no new thing hath since that time been publicly received, and practised in this Church. If you mean (as undoubtedly we think you do) the time preceding the bringing in of Episcopacy, and the acts of Pearth; than you comprehend both Episcopacy and the acts of Pearth under these novations: for the removing whereof, you promise to labour, according to your power: and consequently do disallow and condemn them, even before they be tried in a free assembly, and before they be heard who maintain and approve them as lawful. 3. We may evidently demonstrate this, argumento ad hominem, as we say in the schools: For, those rites and ceremonies, which are abjured in the negative confession, are also abjured in your late Covenant; which, as you say, is all one with the negative confession, or with the Covenant made 1581. But the rites and ceremonies which were concluded in Pearth assembly, are abjured, as you say, in the Covenant made 1581. and therefore they are also abjured in this your late Covenant. The first proposition is evident: For in your late Covenant, speaking of the oath contained in that old Covenant, which was made Anno 1581. you profess, That the present and succeeding generations in this land, are bound to keep the foresaid national oath, as you call it, and subscription, unviolable. The second proposition also cannot be denied by you: For, these twenty years bypast, you have accused those who conformed themselves to the ordinances of Pearth, of perjury; and that because they had violated the oath made Anno 1581. in the which those articles (as you allege) were abjured. But perhaps you will say to us, That we think those things not to be abjured in that oath made Anno 1581. and therefore we may swear, and subscribe your late Covenant; and, notwithstanding of our oath and subscription, be tied only to the forbearance of the practice of Pearth articles for a time. We answer, first; The words of an oath should be clear, and plain: or, if they be any ways ambiguous, the true sense of them should be so declared, and manifested, that all may know it. 2 An oath is to be given, according to the mind and judgement of him that requireth it. And therefore, seeing you who require this oath of us, think the rites or ceremonies concluded at Pearth to be abjured in that oath made Anno 1581. how can we swear and subscribe your Covenant, which reneweth the foresaid oath, and bindeth us to it? 3 If we should swear, and subscribe the negative confession, as it is included in your covenant; than ye, who think the articles of Pearth to be abjured, and condemned in the negative confession, will think us tied, by our own personal oath, to condemn the articles of Pearth. 4 Seeing this covenant was penned by you, who have hitherto not conformed yourselves to Pearth assembly, and have opposed Episcopacy, and seeing you all condemn Episcopacy, as if it were that popish, or wicked Hierarchy, mentioned in the negative confession; as also esteem the things concluded in Pearth assembly, to be idolatrous, or superstitious; how can we think, that you in your solemn vow made to God, for reformation of this Church, and resisting, in times to come, the novations and corruptions of it, have passed by these things, which are the only novations already introduced by authority, and from which, as you affirm, the Church hath so great need to be purged: chiefly, seeing ye think them as popish, superstitious, and idolatrous, as ye do these other novations, which are not as yet introduced. 5 If in all your supplications, plaints, and protestations, ye have only sought the removing and discharging of the Service book. Book of canons, and the new high commission, not complaining of any other novations; and seeing his Majesty hath discharged the first two, and hath promised to rectify the third, or last of them; Then, what reason have ye to think, that his Majesty hath not satisfied your supplications? For, all the novations, upon which you complained, are removed by his Majesty, and ye have his princely promise, That no further shall be urged upon us, but by such a fair and legal way, as may satisfy all his subjects. 6 As for that which your Covenant, by your own confession, requireth of us, to wit, The forbearance, and abstinence, for a time, from the practising the articles of Pearth; We profess sincerely, and in the sight of God, That our conscience will not suffer us to subscribe that part of your Covenant; and that because laws being standing for them, and our lawful superiors requiring obedience from us, by practising them, to swear forbearance of the practice of them, is to swear disobedience, and, to wrong their authority. 7 How can we, with a good Conscience, abstain presently from private baptism, and private communion, being required thereunto by sick persons, and those parents whose children cannot be carried to the Church commodiously with their lives; seeing we think it a thing very unlawful, in such cases, to refuse to administrate those Sacraments in private houses? Not that we think, that God hath tied himself, or his grace, to the Sacraments; but because he hath tied us unto them, by his precept: and, not to use the means appointed by God, when our people, or their children stand in need of them, is a contempt of the means, and a tempting of God. THE V. DEMAND. WHether or no we can sincerely, and with a good conscience, subscribe the negative confession, as it is expounded and interpreted by the contrivers or authors of the late Covenant, seeing it maketh a perpetual law concerning the external rites of the Church, which God hath not made, as if these rites were unchangeable? And how they who both swear the positive confession, and the negative, thus interpreted, can eschew contradiction, seeing the positive confession, Chap. 21. evidently declareth, That these rites are changeable, according to the exigency of time; and consequently, that no perpetual law may or aught to be made concerning them? Likewise we would know how it can stand with truth to abjure all these rites, as Popish, which are used in the Church, without divine institution, expressed in God's word; seeing even these who urge the Covenant, practise some ceremonies which are not mentioned in God's word; as the celebration of marriage before the Church, in the beginning, or at the end of divine service, with all the particulars of it, and the stipulation of Fathers and Godfathers, for the child in baptism, which are not mere circumstances, as they use to distinguish, but also ceremonies, properly so called? ANSWER. THe late Covenant maketh not a perpetual law concerning the external rites of the kirk, as if they were unchangeable: but, as we have said before, only bindeth us, for a time, to forbear the practice of innovations already introduced, and doth not determine whether they ought to be changed, or not. 2. According to this true interpretation, all appearance of contradiction betwixt the confession of faith insert in the act of Parliament, and the latter confession, is removed, beside that the article 21. of the confession of faith, giveth power to the Kirke, in matters of external policy, and order of the worship of God, is expounded in the first book of Discipline, distinguishing between things necessary to be observed in every Kirke, and things variable in particular congregations. 3. We declare again, That the Covenant doth not abjure Pearth articles, as Popish, and thinketh not time now to dispute of significant ceremonies, or other holy rites, and whether the two particulars named be ceremonies, or not: since the confession condescended upon on both sides, abjureth rites which are added without the word of God. REPLY. FIrst, We have already told you, That we cannot subscribe your oath of forbearance of the practice of the articles already introduced, without violation of authority, and of wronging our own consciences, who think private baptism and communion, not to be indifferent, but also necessary, in some cases; not indeed, necessitate medii, as if God's grace were tied to the external means, but, as we say in the schools, necessitate praecepti, because we are commanded to use these means. 2. This late Covenant leadeth and bindeth us to the old Covenant, made 1581. and that old Covenant bindeth us perpetually to that discipline which was then; that is, (as ye allege) to the whole policy of the Church, comprehending all the external rites of it: and so, à primo ad ultimum, this late Covenant bindeth us to the whole policy of the Church, which was then; and consequently maketh a perpetual law, concerning external rites of the Church, as if they were unchangeable. All parts of this argument are sure: For by your late Covenant, you profess yourselves bound, to keep the foresaid national oath (as you call it) inviolable: And that oath, or Covenant, bindeth us, to continue in the obedience not only of the doctrine, but also of the discipline of this Kirke. Where by the discipline of the Kirke, ye understand (as ye have in all your writings professed, especially of late, in your book entitled, A dispute against the English Popish ceremonies. Part 4. Chap. 8. Sect. 6.) the whole external policy of the Church, as it was at that time; to wit, Anno 1581. Yea, you confess, That no other thing can be understood by the discipline of the Kirke, but that which we have said already; and consequently we shall be tied by that oath which you require of us, to admit and practise no other rites and ceremonies, but such as were then received in our Church. We can no ways pass by this, seeing ever since the assembly of Pearth, in your public sermons, and printed books, ye have most vehemently accused us of perjury, as violating the oath, or covenant, made Anno 1581. and that in respect we have admitted into the Church, some rites, or ceremonies, which were not in it the foresaid year of God. Is not this to make a perpetual law, concerning the external rites of the Church, as if they were unchangeable, and to abjure the practice of all rites introduced in the Church since that time; and consequently the practice of the articles of Pearth, and that not for a time only, but for ever? 3. Seeing the negative confession, according to your mind, and conception of it, maketh the whole external policy of the Church, as it was Anno 1581. to be unchangeable: and on the contrary, the confession insert into the acts of Parliament, declareth, That the rites belonging to the external policy of the Church, are changeable; how can you escape a contradiction, if ye receive both these confessions? 4. Whereas by that distinction mentioned in your answer, of things necessary to be observed, and of things variable in particular congregations, ye insinuate that by the keeping of the discipline of the Kirke as it was then, to which we are bound in the old Covenant, ye understand the observation of those things which are necessary to be observed in every kirk, and not of things variable in particular congregations: We ask, Into which of the members of this distinction ye refer Episcopacy, and the articles of Pearth? That is, Whether they must necessarily be omitted in all Churches, and at all times, or not? If ye say, that they must be necessarily omitted, and that the negative confession, confirmed with an oath, doth tie us to the omission of them; then both ye would make us to swear, and subscribe against our consciences, (for we are persuaded, That these things are lawful) as also ye would make us to abjure Episcopacy, and the articles of Pearth, in perpetuum; which is flatly contrary to your declaration in your answers, 1.5. etc. If you say on the other part, That we are not tied by the negative confession, to the omission of these things; then, why have ye, in all your writings against us, exprobrate to us, perjury, in violating of the oath contained in the negative confession? 5. We would gladly have known your mind, concerning the lawfulness of such rites as are not of divine institution, expressed in God's word. For we ingenously profess, That none of your answers (which hitherto we have seen) to the instances, or examples brought by us in our fifth Demand of rites used by yourselves, in your Churches, as lawful, without divine institution, (to which we could add many more) do give us any satisfaction: nor yet, as we think, can give satisfaction to any indifferent man. As for example; Is blessing of marriages a mere circumstance? Who can be so impudent, as to say so? Or, if it be a ceremony, what precept or practice have ye of it in Gods whole word? if it be alleged. That we have a warrant from that blessing pronounced, Gen 1.28. upon m●n and woman, after their creation; we ask, By what consequence can that solemnity of blessing of marriages used in our Churches, with all the ceremonies of it, be drawn from that effectual and operative blessing of our first parents, or rather of whole mankind? Is there here an institution of a perpetual observance, or rite, to be used in the Church, more than in the 22. verse of the same chapter, when God blessed the fowls, and fishes, and said, Be fruitful, and multiple, and fill the waters in the seas? etc. If again it be answered, That pastoral benediction, is mentioned in Scripture▪ first, What is that to blessing of marriages? And secondly, Why are not all other pactions▪ as well as marriages, blessed in the Church; chiefly, seeing matrimonial blessing hath been, and is, abused in the Roman Church, which holdeth, That marriage is a sacrament; and consequently, matrimonial benediction ought, as it would seem, to be secluded from the Church, rather than other blessings? THE VI DEMAND. WHether or no it be fit to subscribe such an interpretation, as in matters of lawfulness, and unlawfulness; and consequently in matters of faith, contradicteth the judgement of so many Divines, most famous, of the reformed Church, both ancient and modern, (who did, and do hold, that these rites and ordinances brought into this Church by the assembly of Pearth, are in their own nature lawful, and such as ought not to make a stir in the Church of God) and also condemneth the venerable practice of the ancient Church, and the most eminent lights of it, even in those purest times, unto which we appeal against the Papists, in our disputes. ANSWER. WE trust, That no sound Divine, ancient or modern, would in this case deny the expedience of the forbearance of the practice of Pearth articles. And further than this, nothing at this time is required. REPLY. YOur silence, in not answering that which we affirmed, concerning the judgement of Divines, ancient and modern, of the reformed Church, anent the lawfulness of the rites and ordinances, which were received in our Church, by the ordinance of the assembly of Pearth; as also concerning the judgement and practice of the ancient Church; doth make us think, that ye acknowledge the truth of that which we affirmed there. 2. We have already shown, That the oath which ye require of us, importeth more than the forbearance of the practice of Pearth articles, for a time. 3. The forbearance of some of them, seemeth to us, to be merely unlawful, and contrary to that pastoral duty we owe to our flock. 4. The forbearance of any of them, considered with a relation to the authority enjoining them, in our judgement, is plain disobedience. THE VII. DEMAND. WHether it be agreeable to charity or piety, to require us to abjure these rites, as Popish; which in the sincerity of our hearts, following the light of our conscience, (whereof we take God to witness) we have hitherto practised, as lawful, and laudably following the same light, do yet practise them? But suppose this might be required of us by any; Quaeritur, Whether or no it becometh them so peremptorily, and upon such a suddenty, to urge us to this, who these bygone twenty years, have desired earnestly to enjoy the freedom of their consciences in their Ministry, even in denying obedience to these things, and standing laws for them; and when they were urged to obedience did so often protest, and earnestly request, That they might have a time, to be well informed, and maturely advised of the matter, which to the most part of them was most graciously granted? Let them▪ therefore, look to that natural Maxim, Quod tibi fieri non vis, alteri ne feceris: and to our Saviour's precept of the same sense, and almost of the same words, Mat. 7. verse. 12. ANSWER. WE hope, that such a forbearance of the practice, will prejudge the liberty of no man's conscience. REPLY. IT would much prejudge our consciences, to swear and subscribe the negative confession, taking it according to your conception and meaning, who require our oath. 2 How can we swear, to labour, by all means lawful (as ye require in your covenant) to expel those things, whereof we hold some to be necessary, and all the rest, to be lawful, and laudable? THE VIII. DEMAND. WHether it be fitting to swear to defend the King's Person and Authority, with this limitation, In the defence and preservation of the true Religion, laws, and liberties of this Kingdom? As if their persons ought not to be defended against all enemies, although as yet they embraced not the truth: or having before embraced it, yet have fallen from it: or as if their royal Authority were not to be acknowledged, although commanding things unlawful; and as if we were not subject thereto, in yielding to suffer under them, when we give not active obedience to them? ANSWER. 1. THe answer of the first Demand, may give satisfaction here. 2. The Specification of the defending the King's Person and Authority, in the defence of the true religion, laws, and liberties of the Kingdom, is warranted by the Confession ratified in Parliament, by other acts of Parliament, by the other Confession, and by the general band joined with it. 3 No man will withhold his Subscription from the Covenant, because it doth not, as it intendeth not to express every duty we owe to the King's Majesty, as if the not naming, were a denying of the duty. REPLY. WHat ye have replied in your Answer to our first Demand, we have examined, in our confutation of your Answer. 2. If ye consider well all the circumstances of the making of your Covenant, ye will find that it had not been amiss, at this time, to have expressed more fully the loyalty of your intentions, to maintain the King's person, and honour. Next, it is necessary to express it yet more fully, for our cause, whom ye require to swear and subscribe your Covenant; lest we do any thing, in this matter, with a doubting conscience, (which is a grievous sin) that is, Doubting whether or no we are tied by our oath to maintain the King's authority, only in so far, as it is employed in the defence of the foresaid true Religion: or, at least, as it is not employed against it. For it seemeth to us unlawful, to swear the maintenance of the King's authority, with this limitation precisely. And if ye be of a contrary mind, we are most willing to confer with you of this point. THE IX. DEMAND. WHether or no we can sincerely swear to maintain the Authority, truly and properly monarchical of the King; and withal swear also disobedience to these articles, which are authorized by his standing laws, and to maintain the meanest of his subjects against him, in their disobedience of his laws, as yet standing in vigour concerning these things. ANSWER. 1. THe answer to the first Demand, is useful here also. 2. Forbearance of practice, for a time, in such a case, is rather obedience, than disobedience: for example, Kneeling was thought convenient, because all memory of superstition was passed; should it not therefore be forborn, because superstition, is now revived, and flagrant? They who practice, keep the letter of the law: but they who forbear, keep the life and reason thereof. REPLY. YOur Covenant requireth more of us, than the forbearance of the practice of Pearth articles, as we have often times declared. 2 We have also shown, That the forbearance of obedience to standing laws, without licence of Superiors, and contrary to their commandment, especially if it be done by deliberation, and if men tie themselves, by an oath, to do so, is manifest disobedience. 3 The article of Pearth, anent kneeling, was not grounded only, nor yet principally, upon that narrative which ye mention; but rather upon the conveniency and decency of the gesture of kneeling, in the receiving of the holy Sacrament: which reason doth yet continue; as also the other reason which ye mention, holdeth yet: for the body of the people of this Church were never papists; and consequently, have no memory of popish superstition, as those who lived in time of reformation. 4 We cannot see nor conceive, how a vow and band of maintaining the meanest subject of this Kingdom, against all persons whatsoever; and consequently, against the King himself, as we have shown in our second Reply, in disobedience of his laws, can consist with that love, reverence, and subjection, which we owe to our King. Neither have ye brought any thing in your Answer, to satisfy us in this point. And, because ye allege, as we hear, that ye are mistaken in this point, and do vindicate yourselves, by those words of the Covenant, wherein ye promise to maintain the King's authority; we pray you to express your mind more fully, concerning it; and to show us, 1 What ye mean by maintaining the King's authority, in that part of your Covenant, wherein ye express your loyal intention, To maintain the King's person, and authority; and in special, Whether or no the maintaining of the King's authority, be taken by you, as it excludeth all resisting of his Authority, by force of arms, even although he should command things unlawful, and contrary to the truth? For so we think it should be taken: and that it should be so taken, we are ready to demonstrate. Neither can we swear it in any other sense. 2 Whether your promise of mutual defence, In the same cause of maintaining the true Religion, and his Majesty's authority, etc. aught to be understood, of the maintaining the King's authority absolutely: that is, Whether he maintain the true Religion, or no? Or, on the contrary; If it ought to be understood of the maintaining the King's authority conditionally, in so far as he maintaineth the true Religion, and not any other ways? If you say, that it is to be understood the first way, we assent to that part of your Covenant, and have no more scruple anent it, except that one which we mentioned in our Reply to your second Answer: to wit, That the words of your Protestation seem to import more; and, that your Paction, or Covenant, is made without the King's privity, and consent. If ye say, that it is to be understood the second way; then we continue urging our foresaid Demand: to wit, How a man can maintain the King's authority, and withal maintain the meanest of his subjects in resisting his Authority? And how we can be said, to stand for the King's honour, when we vow and promise, do to that which he himself professeth to be against his Honour; and which, in the common judgement of men, is thought to be so? The determination of this point, is more than necessary, at this time: and therefore, let us in sincerity and brotherly love, confer of it; that the consciences of others who doubt of this, may receive satisfaction. THE X. DEMAND. WHether or no we ought to swear to such a Covenant, which taketh away from us all hope of a free assembly, or Parliament, to judge of the matter presently debated? For how can these vote freely of any matter propounded to the decision and deliberation of the Church and Estate, who have already sworn to adhere to one part of the question? and how can those who descent from them, submit themselves to their judgement, chiefly seeing they are possessors, and have laws Civil and Ecclesiastic, standing as yet for them? ANSWER. WE perceive, that this tenth Demand, is made of the articles of Pearth; therefore we answer as before; That we promise only forbearance, which can prejudge no man's liberty in a general assembly. REPLY. WE have shown, That your Covenant, and Oath, importeth a manifest abjuration of the articles of Pearth: and therefore, the swearing of it doth manifestly prejudge the liberty of voting in a national assembly: For, how can they freely either reason in an assembly, concerning Episcopacy, and the articles of Pearth; or else, give their judgement, without prejudice, concerning them who have already promised, sworn, and vowed, first, To adhere to the discipline of the Kirke: that is, (according to your interpretation) to the whole external policy of the Church, as it was 1581. 2 To labour, by all means lawful, to remove, and expel, all those rites and ordinances, which have come into the Church since the foresaid year of God; that the Church may be restored to the liberty, and purity, which it then had. Whereby ye declare, That the foresaid articles, and Episcopacy, are contrary to the liberty, and purity of the Church; and consequently, ye are tied by your oath, to vote against them, if ye be called to the intended assembly. THE XI. DEMAND. WHether our subscribing, together with our people, to the confession of this nation, which is ratified and registrated in Parliament, Anno 1567. may give full satisfaction to all who doubt of the sincerity of our profession, if so be they have no farther aim, but only to know and see our willingness, and constant resolution, to adhere to the religion presently professed, and to oppose all errors contrary to it, to our lives end? Now seeing we are willing to do this, as we take God to witness, we are; how are we hated, maligned, and traduced as enemies of the truth, only because our consciences do not suffer us to subscribe to that interpretation of the negative confession insert in the Covenant, (concerning which we can see no warrant of the truth of it, nor lawful authority binding us to it) and to the politic, or rather military part of that Covenant, which is a thing without the compass of our calling, and not belonging to that contending for the faith once delivered to the saints, of which S. jude speaketh in his epistle. ANSWER. SInce no other mean could be found so effectual, for holding out of Popery, and forbearing of dangerous novations in religion, such as the Service book, and Canons, which as yet are only discharged, till in a fair and legal way they may be introduced; and are by no word of the late Proclamation disallowed: although the Service book, by the Proclamation, February 19 be highly praised, as serving to edification, and to beat out all superstition: and nothing in this application is abjured, but what was abjured in the former; why shall we forbear to use a mean so just, and so powerful, for the preservation of the purity of religion? REPLY. HEre ye do not particularly answer to our Demand, and seem unwilling to give that testimony of us, your brethren, concerning our sincerity in professing of the Truth, which, all who know and judge unpartially of us, do think to be due to us. It is sufficiently known, what pains we take in disputing and writing against Papists, in confuting their errors in our pulpits, in leading process against them, according to the order of the Church, and in doing all things against Romish errors, which can be expected from the most zealous Professors of the Truth. If ye, or any other of our reverend brethren, doubt of the sincerity of our profession, then pose us concerning any Article controverted, and we shall be most ready to declare our mind concerning it before all men, and give a sufficient proof to the world, that we have pried as narrowly into the mysteries of Romish errors, for refutation of them, as any of those who impiously, and uncharitably traduce us, as favourers of Popery. 2. We have other means more effectual, and lawful, (whereas we think this your mean to be unlawful) for holding out of Popery: and in which we ought to confide more, than in all the promises and vows of men; yea, also, more than in all the united forces of all the subjects of this land: to wit, Diligent preaching, and teaching of the word, frequent prayer to God, humbling of ourselves before him, amendment of our lives and conversations, and arming ourselves against our adversaries, by diligent searching of the Scriptures, and using all other means, whereby we may increase in the knowledge of the truth, and in ability, to defend it against the enemies of it. 3. The subjects of this Kingdom, at least a great part of them, either by their own inclination, or by the persuasion of others, have such a hard conceit of the Service book, and Canons, that if his Majesty use a fair and legal way of bringing them into this Church, especially such a way as may give satisfaction to all his subjects, in all appearance, we need not to fear the in bringing of them. THE XII. DEMAND. WHereas we hear of divers disorders, and violent miscarriages of those who have subscribed the Covenant, against our brethren of the holy Ministry, who continue in their obedience to the laws of the Church and Kingdom; which miscarriages being done without all form of justice, or legal proceeding, are an exercising of revenge, by private authority, and consequently are forbidden in the sixth commandment: which is one of the reasons which moveth us, not to join ourselves unto their society. We would gladly therefore know of our reverend brethren, who have come hither to recommend the late Covenant unto us; First, Whether or no they do allow these disorders? 2. If they allow them, what reason have they so to do? And if they allow them not, how is it, that these disorders and miscarriages, are not publicly by them, and other Pastors of their confederacy, condemned, and sharply rebuked in their pulpits? Why are the actors of them not tried and censured? And why do they delay to give out some public declaration, either in print or writ, to this effect, being long since exhorted to do so? ANSWER. 1. HArdly can a zealous people assembled in a Kirk for the worship of God, be kept from tumult, when books, and a worship which they either know, or conceive to be popish, are suddenly, and imperiously obtruded upon them by the Leaders: & how far the keeping of the material kirks from the pollution of worship, belongeth to the people, and community of the faithful, should be considered. 2. Violence done in other places, and upon other occasions, we no more allow, than we do approve the aspersions of perjury, rebellion, etc. which some men do put upon us. REPLY. IT belongeth not to the people, or community of the faithful, to contemn Authority, and the Lords Service, done in his own House, on his own day, so far as to put violent hands on Prelates and Pastors, in time of Divine worship, while they are practising those things which are enjoined by the King, and his Council. Such disorders, and contemptuous carriages, do not beseem those whom Christ inviteth to come to him, and to learn of him, meekness, and lowliness of heart; chiefly, seeing there are many other ways, whereby people may testify their aversation of those books, and worship, which they conceive to be Popish. If it be a sin in parents to provoke their children to wrath; much more is it a sin in children to provoke their parents; especially Patrem Patriae, the common father of the country, so to wrath. 2. The keeping of God's house from the pollution of worship, belongeth to those who are clothed with lawful authority. 3. We not only asked of you, Whether or no ye did allow the miscarriages towards our brethren of the holy Ministry, mentioned in our Demand? but also supposing that ye do not allow them, we asked, How is it that those disorders and miscarriages, are not publicly by you condemned, and rebuked? Why are the actors of them not tried, and censured? And why do ye not give some public document to the world of your aversation of such miscarriages? chiefly, seeing they are, as we have shown, a manifest transgression of the sixth Commandment. We cannot sufficiently marvel, that ye have kept up your minds in this matter, and not answered to so important, and necessary a Demand. As for your complaint of perjury and rebellion, etc. if ye mean the warning late written to the subjects in Scotland, ye shall know, that the Author thereof himself is much displeased with any offensive asperity, which hath been found in some written Copies thereof; and hath already done that, for removing of that offence: which, we hope, shall give full satisfaction to all men. THE XIII. DEMAND. HOw can we subscribe that Covenant, without incurring many grievous scandals; as first, the scandal of dissenting from other Reformed Churches, and famous Divines, the chief instruments of the Reformation of the Church in Europe, who did hold these rites which are abjured in this late Covenant, as merely unlawful, popish, and idolatrous, to be in their own nature, lawful. Secondly, the scandal of dissenting from antiquity, and vilipending it altogether in matters of the external policy of the Church; which we know, and have found by frequent experience, to be a thing that maketh many Papists more averse from our profession, than other ways they would be. Thirdly, the scandal of perjury, which some of us cannot escape, who did swear obedience to the articles of Pearth, and to our Ordinary, at our admission to the Ministry. ANSWER. THat threefold scandal causeth upon the right interpretation of the clause of the forbearance of the novations already introduced. REPLY. WE have shown your interpretation of the clause of forbearance, not to be right, and have refuted it, we think, by the very words of your Covenant; so that none of these three scandals can be eschewed by us, if we subscribe to your foresaid Covenant. 2. Suppose the other two might be eschewed by that interpretation of the clause of forbearance, yet the third cannot be eschewed, seeing at our admission we have sworn obedience to the articles of Pearth, and to our Ordinary: Wherefore, ye must either prove the Articles of Pearth, and Episcopacy, to be unlawful, or else, we cannot, without violation of our oath, made at our admission, forbear the practice of the foresaid Articles, against the will of our Ordinary, and other our lawful Superiors. THE XIIII. DEMAND. LAst of all; We pray these reverend and worthy brethren, to consider impartially, and charitably, seeing we have all these scruples in our minds concerning their Covenant, as also seeing we are yet most confident, and assured of the lawfulness of the articles of Pearth, together with the lawfulness and venerable antiquity of Episcopal government, how we can, with a safe conscience, give our consent that they should preach in our pulpits, who come professedly to withdraw our people from that which we in the inmost thoughts of our souls do embrace as lawful; and from that obedience which they do owe to their gracious and pious Sovereign therein; whose last Proclamation hath given full satisfaction to us all, and much rejoiced our hearts, in respect he hath there in most solemnly, and by his oath declared, not only his sincerity in professing the truth, but also his pious resolution, to continue therein, and maintain it constantly to his lives end, most graciously and wisely removing these things which have occasioned the late perturbation of our Church. We wish them likewise, to consider, how they can require this of us, seeing they would not (we appeal to their own consciences) be content that they should be so dealt with themselves; we mean, that any should go up to their pulpits, and condemn their doctrine, and practice, and withdraw their people from that which hath been before recommended unto them as truth. We conclude: Exhorting earnestly, entreating lovingly, and charging modestly, these, and all others, our reverend brethren, before God, and the Lord jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing in his kingdom, if there be any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship of the Spirit, if any bowels of mercies, to look narrowly to their own consciences, in these weighty matters; remembering that of jeremy, The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked, who can know it? To judge charitably of us their brethren; remembering that of our Saviour, judge not, that ye be not judged: To deal with us in love and meekness, (if so be they think us to have gone astray from the truth; which, God knoweth, we no ways do perceive) remembering that of S. Paul, If a man be overtaken in a fault, ye that are spiritual, restore such an one with the spirit of meekness: as also that of S. james, The wisdom that is from above, is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated; full of mercy, and good fruits, etc. And last of all, To seek peace, and so to follow after it; that this our dear native country be not exposed to a dangerous warfare, and to all the woeful consequents thereof; of which our hearts cannot think, without trembling and horror. ANSWER. 1 NOthing in the interpretation of the Covenant, against the lawfulness of Pearth articles, and of Episcopal government. 2 We never intended to draw the meanest of the subjects, from that loyalty of obedience, which they owe to their Sovereign, and ours. 3 The Counsel hath rescinded the approbation of that Proclamation. 4 His Majesty's religious and righteous disposition, hath been to us a ground, and chief argument of our hope of the hearing of all our petitions. 5 We have no desire to wrong our reverend and worthy brethren: but rather to pass in silence, the wrongs which we have sustained by them: And would approve ourselves unto our God, and prove faithful in the employments put upon us: earnestly desiring, That every eye may perceive the wonderful work of God in this land: lest any of us be found fight against God; and that all of us may join heart and hand, for the purity and peace of the Kirk of our Lord jesus Christ, blessed for ever. Mr. ALEXANDER HENDERSON, Minister at Leuchars. Mr. DAVID DICKSON, Minister at Irwing. Mr. ANDREW CANT, Minister at Petsligo. july 21. 1638. REPLY. THere is too much, as we think, in your Covenant against the lawfulness of Pearth Articles. 2 Your band of mutual defence, against all persons whatsoever, may draw subjects, perhaps, to take arms against their King, (which God avert) and consequently from that loyalty of obedience, which they owe to their Sovereign, and ours; except ye declare, and explain yourselves better, than ye have hitherto done. 3 What the most honourable Lords of his Majesty's privy Council have done concerning the King's Majesties last Proclamation, is not sufficiently known to us, and far less upon what grounds and motives they have (as you say) rescinded their approbation of the late Proclamation. 4 His Majesty's religious and righteous disposition, hath been to us, and is a main ground wherefore we rest and rely upon his gracious Proclamation, persuading ourselves, that he intendeth not, nor ever intended, any innovation in religion. 5 We shall labour, by all means, to eschew every thing, which in the least degree may wrong you, our reverend and worthy brethren. As for the wrongs already done by us to you, (as ye pretend) whensoever it shall please you to specify them, we hope to give you full satisfaction, and to clear ourselves of that imputation. 6 The work of God towards any nation, how strange and wonderful soever it seem to be, is never contrary to his word: And therefore we fear not to be found fight against God's work, so long as we fight not against his truth, revealed in his word. That allseeing Lord knoweth, that we maintain his truth according to the light of our consciences, and are ready to join heart and hand with you, for the purity and peace of this Church, in every lawful way and course, as sincere lovers of truth and peace. And now, brethren, before we conclude, again we entreat you, and all others our dear country men, especially our reverend brethren of the holy Ministry, to judge charitably of us, and of our proceedings at this time; and in particular, of these our Demands, and Replies; which, God is our witness, neither hatred of any man's person, nor love of contention, nor any worldly respect; but only the conscience of our calling hath drawn from us. And as for our arguments for not subscribing, which are taken from our due subjection and obedience to our Sovereign, and his laws, We protest and declare, That they ought not to be so interpreted, as if we intended to accuse you, or others, our dear country men, of disloyalty towards our most gracious King; or as if our purpose were to lay any such imputation upon you: For they are only used by us, to show what the words of the Covenant seem to us to import, and how we conceive of them; as also, what maketh us so to conceive of them. We doubt not, reverend brethren, but ye know, that as we owe to you, and to your proceedings, the favourable judgement of charity; so we ought to judge of those things, which we are to swear, and subscribe, with the strict and inquisitive judgement of verity; and consequently, we ought to ponder duly, and to propound particularly and fully to others, (especially to those who require our oath and subscription, and undertake to satisfy our consciences thereanent) all the doubts and reasons which make us unwilling or afraid to give our subscription thereunto. JOHN FORBES of Corse, Doctor and Professor of Divinity in Aberdene. ALEXANDER SCROGIE, Minister at old Aberdene, D. D. WILLIAM LESLEY, D. D. and Principal of the King's College, in Aberdene. ROBERT BARON, Doctor and Professor of Divinity, and Minister at Aberdene. JA. SIBBALD, Doctor of Divinity, and Minister at Aberdene. ALEXANDER ROSS, Doctor of Divinity, and Minister at Aberdene. FINIS.