key: cord-1052198-kw7u3ydd authors: Gomez-Simmonds, Angela; Annavajhala, Medini K; McConville, Thomas H; Dietz, Donald E; Shoucri, Sherif M; Laracy, Justin C; Rozenberg, Felix D; Nelson, Brian; Greendyke, William G; Furuya, E Yoko; Whittier, Susan; Uhlemann, Anne-Catrin title: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales causing secondary infections during the COVID-19 crisis at a New York City hospital date: 2020-11-17 journal: J Antimicrob Chemother DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa466 sha: f560d5b2bc3d98a18109256704d65a0e39169756 doc_id: 1052198 cord_uid: kw7u3ydd BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 may be at increased risk for secondary bacterial infections with MDR pathogens, including carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE). OBJECTIVES: We sought to rapidly investigate the clinical characteristics, population structure and mechanisms of resistance of CPE causing secondary infections in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively identified CPE clinical isolates collected from patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and April 2020 at our medical centre in New York City. Available isolates underwent nanopore sequencing for rapid genotyping, antibiotic resistance gene detection and phylogenetic analysis. RESULTS: We identified 31 CPE isolates from 13 patients, including 27 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 4 Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates. Most patients (11/13) had a positive respiratory culture and 7/13 developed bacteraemia; treatment failure was common. Twenty isolates were available for WGS. Most K. pneumoniae (16/17) belonged to ST258 and encoded KPC (15 KPC-2; 1 KPC-3); one ST70 isolate encoded KPC-2. E. cloacae isolates belonged to ST270 and encoded NDM-1. Nanopore sequencing enabled identification of at least four distinct ST258 lineages in COVID-19 patients, which were validated by Illumina sequencing data. CONCLUSIONS: While CPE prevalence has declined substantially in New York City in recent years, increased detection in patients with COVID-19 may signal a re-emergence of these highly resistant pathogens in the wake of the global pandemic. Increased surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship efforts, as well as identification of optimal treatment approaches for CPE, will be needed to mitigate their future impact. The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel respiratory tract pathogen SARS-CoV-2, seems likely to be accompanied by a wave of secondary bacterial infections. Available evidence indicates that culture-proven secondary infections occur in 4%-15% of hospitalized patients and are significantly associated with mortality. [1] [2] [3] [4] However, few studies further characterize corresponding clinical and microbiological data. Moreover, antibiotic use has been widespread in patients with COVID-19, 5 raising concerns about the emergence of MDR organisms. Here we describe 13 patients with severe COVID-19 who subsequently developed hospital-associated infections with carbapenemaseproducing Enterobacterales (CPE) at our medical centre in New York City. All patients included in this cohort had positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 between 10 March and 30 April 2020 and had a clinical culture positive for carbapenemase gene-positive Enterobacterales identified by retrospective chart review up to 25 May 2020. Surveillance for MDR Gram-negative organisms was not routinely performed on hospital or ICU admission during the study period. Clinical isolates underwent routine species identification and susceptibility testing by MicroScan (Beckman Coulter) in our clinical microbiology laboratory. Carbapenemase genes including bla KPC and bla NDM were detected using the Xpert Carba-R assay (Cepheid) for meropenem-resistant isolates. We also performed broth microdilution (BMD) assays for meropenem and Etests (bioMérieux) for ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/ vaborbactam on available isolates, with MIC > 2 mg/L used to define meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam resistance. Finally, we used nanopore long-read WGS to rapidly derive isolate V C The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. genotypes and perform phylogenetic analysis. Briefly, genomic DNA libraries were prepared using the Rapid Barcoding Kit and sequenced on a MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). To identify the isolate MLST, plasmid rep genes and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), reads were aligned against established databases. [6] [7] [8] [9] De novo assemblies were generated using Canu. 10 For isolates belonging to Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258, we constructed phylogenetic trees from isolates with available nanopore sequencing data. Isolates derived from patients with COVID-19 and historical ST258 clinical isolates collected at our hospital between 2011 and 2017 were included. 11 Here, core-genome SNPs were identified by mapping Canu-assembled nanopore genomes against an internal ST258 reference genome using Snippy (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy). To validate phylogenetic inferences made from nanopore-sequenced genomes, isolates were also sequenced on a MiSeq platform using the Nextera Flex Library Preparation Kit (Illumina). Phylogenetic trees were generated using RAxML 12 and visualized using the R 'ggtree' library. 13 Study procedures were approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board (Protocol AAAR7701). Genomes were deposited in Genbank (https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) under BioProject number PRJNA645930. Of 3152 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to the hospital during the study period, we identified 13 patients who had 31 positive cultures for CPE (Table 1) . Carbapenemase genes were not detected in carbapenemresistant Enterobacterales isolated from an additional seven patients and were not included in the analysis. Most patients in this cohort were elderly (median age 67 years, IQR 50-72) and all but one had documented chronic comorbidities. The most common source of infection was the respiratory tract (11/13); bacteraemia developed in seven (54%) patients. All patients had prolonged, complex hospitalizations, with 12/13 patients requiring intubation and ICU-level care, and 10 requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Prior to CPE detection, 10/13 patients received immunomodulators including corticosteroids (9/10) and/or IL-6 receptor antagonists (3/10). All patients also received broadspectrum b-lactam antibiotics including piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime and/or meropenem. Initial treatment of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections consisted primarily of ceftazidime/avibactam (10/11; one patient died before initiation of appropriate antibiotics), given in combination with other agents (polymyxin B, eravacycline or levofloxacin) in three patients. Importantly, 8/13 patients had persistently positive cultures 7 days after initial CPE detection, in some cases with subsequent development of bacteraemia or infection at a different body site. Three patients initially treated with ceftazidime/avibactam monotherapy subsequently required additional or alternative antibiotics Gomez-Simmonds et al. (meropenem/vaborbactam or polymyxin B). Five patients in this cohort expired, two of whom had positive post-mortem cultures, and the other eight survived to hospital discharge. Twenty isolates from 12 patients were available for nanopore sequencing (Table 1) . CPE isolates consisted of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (27/31) and NDM-producing Enterobacter cloacae complex (4/31). The majority of sequenced K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to ST258 harbouring bla KPC-2 (15/17). In ST258 isolates, bla KPC-2 was found within the Tn4401a transposon but was encoded by two different plasmids belonging to the IncN/R and IncFIB/FII families. One patient who developed ventilatorassociated pneumonia (VAP) with K. pneumoniae ST258 and had persistently positive cultures was subsequently found to have K. pneumoniae ST70 harbouring bla KPC-2 on an IncFIB/FII plasmid. Only one ST258 isolate harboured bla KPC-3 . Lastly, three E. cloacae ST270 isolates from two patients harboured bla NDM-1 , putatively encoded by an IncHI2 plasmid. Most of the available isolates in this collection (18/20) demonstrated high-level meropenem resistance (meropenem MIC 16 mg/L by BMD), with MIC 50 and MIC 90 values of 64 and 128 mg/L for all isolates, respectively. Most KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC 50 and MIC 90 of 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively). However, one patient with K. pneumoniae VAP developed ceftazidime/avibactam treatment failure attributable to development of resistance, also with reversion of meropenem MIC to the susceptible range (MIC 0.094 mg/L). bla KPC-2 sequencing of the ceftazidime/avibactamresistant isolate (NK1677) confirmed an aspartic acid-to-tyrosine substitution at Ambler amino acid position 179 (D179Y). 14,15 All NDM-producing E. cloacae isolates were highly resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam. CPE isolates also encoded a large number of additional ARGs (median 18, IQR 16.5-18.5) conferring resistance across a broad range of antibiotic classes, including aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines. In a phylogenetic analysis of ST258 genomes performed to further investigate isolate clustering, we found evidence for several distinct lineages in patients with COVID-19, each with 80% bootstrap support (Figure 1 ). Most of these belonged to two branches corresponding to isolates harbouring bla KPC-2 on IncN/R versus IncFIB/FII plasmids (Figure 1a-c) . These two branches also largely consisted of isolates derived from patients admitted to two separate hospital units (Units 1 and 2) . Two isolates from one patient with COVID-19 from a different hospital unit (Unit 3), which also harboured bla KPC-2 on IncN/R plasmids, comprised a separate branch, as did one isolate encoding bla KPC-3 from a patient who was also hospitalized on a different unit (Unit 4). Phylogenetic tree topology was similar and evidence of clustering was evident using both sequencing approaches, albeit with larger branch lengths for nanopore-sequenced ( Figure 1a ) compared with Illuminasequenced genomes (Figure 1b) . Notably, each lineage of isolates from COVID-19 patients was closely related to at least one K. pneumoniae ST258 isolate from respiratory cultures collected at our hospital between 2011 and 2016 (100% bootstrap support) (Figure 1c ). A broad range of factors likely contributed to the development of CPE infections in this patient population. Underlying disease manifestations such as severe lung injury leading to prolonged mechanical ventilation, coupled with immune dysregulation in the setting of critical illness and use of immunomodulatory therapies, such as corticosteroids and IL-6 inhibitors, almost certainly increased the risk of bacterial superinfection. Receipt of broad-spectrum antibiotics may have generated antibiotic pressure for the emergence of MDR pathogens. Beginning in March 2020, our hospital underwent a massive escalation of inpatient and critical care capacity to accommodate the rapid influx of patients with COVID-19. While clearly necessary to address the heavy burden of disease in our area, measures such as ICU patient cohorting and extended use of gowns and other personal protective equipment in COVID-19 units may have enabled transmission of other pathogens including MDR bacteria within hospital units. Given that we observed several different strains of KPC-and NDM-producing Enterobacterales in this cohort, however, we suspect that prolonged critical illness and other clinical factors produced an optimal host environment supporting the emergence of diverse CPE in this setting. CPE infections are associated with increased mortality in the face of multi-class antibiotic resistance and could place additional burdens on already overstretched health systems. While CPE are endemic in New York City, the appearance of CPE in this patient population is notable for occurring in the setting of a recent decrease in the incidence at our institution and citywide. 16 According to hospital antibiogram data, the proportion of inpatient Enterobacterales isolates resistant to meropenem decreased from a peak of 7.5% in 2010 to 1.5% in 2018; 27 meropenemresistant K. pneumoniae or E. cloacae isolates were identified in 2018. Moreover, optimal treatment regimens for CPE in this patient population have not yet been determined. A large proportion of patients with KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam demonstrated persistently positive cultures and one patient was found to have treatment failure due to development of a resistanceconferring mutation in bla KPC-2 . Most patients in this cohort developed respiratory tract infections and many also required RRT, both risk factors for ceftazidime/avibactam failure. 17 As the pandemic continues, it will be critical to devise active surveillance and prevention strategies and optimize treatment approaches to limit the impact of these MDR pathogens. Use of nanopore sequencing facilitated rapid genotyping and ARG profiling, including data availability within several hours of initiating sequencing. We also successfully carried out phylogenetic analysis using long reads only. Although within-patient SNP distances were much higher than with corresponding Illumina sequencing data, results were consistent and corroborated available epidemiological and genotyping data. We were able to use this approach to demonstrate the presence of multiple different ST258 lineages driving the emergence of CPE in this patient population and link these lineages to historical isolates. Taken together, this approach could be integrated into infection control approaches to rapidly identify ARGs and putative transmission clusters in patients with COVID-19. In conclusion, increased detection of CPE in patients with COVID-19 supports recent concerns regarding the emergence of MDR bacterial co-infections in the wake of the global pandemic. Developing approaches for mitigating the impact of MDR infections in this patient population should be a necessary component of management strategies for patients with COVID-19. This study was supported by the NIAID at the NIH (RO1 AI116939 to A.C.U. and K23 AI137316 to A.G.S.). The funders of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. A.-C.U. has received research funding from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Allergan. All other authors have no potential conflicts to disclose. Figure 1 . Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees generated using nanopore and Illumina-sequenced genomes of K. pneumoniae ST258 historical isolates and isolates derived from patients with COVID-19. Maximum-likelihood trees of de novo assembled K. pneumoniae ST258 isolates were constructed based on core-genome concatenated SNPs, including all available isolates from patients with COVID-19 and historical isolates with available nanopore sequencing data (Figure 1a) . The resulting tree topology was similar to that derived using Illumina sequencing (Figure 1b) , although with shorter branch length and improved within-cluster resolution, and confirmed the presence of at least four different distinct ST258 lineages within this cohort. Finally, inclusion of all historical respiratory ST258 isolates with available Illumina sequencing data demonstrated links within each COVID-19-associated lineage (Figure 1c) . In all tree topologies, isolates derived from patients with COVID-19 largely corresponded to four separate hospital units (Units 1-4) , designated by shaded boxes in each tree, whereas historical isolates are unmarked. One isolate (KP1594), which clustered with Unit 1 genomes, was derived from a separate hospital unit and is marked with an asterisk (Figure 1a) . This figure appears in colour in the online version of JAC and in black and white in the print version of JAC. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study Bacterial and fungal coinfection among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study in a UK secondary-care setting Bacterial and fungal co-infections in COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the New York City pandemic surge Bacterial and fungal co-infection in individuals with coronavirus: a rapid review to support COVID-19 antimicrobial prescribing Multilocus sequence typing of Klebsiella pneumoniae nosocomial isolates Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for characterization of Enterobacter cloacae ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation Emergence of polymyxin resistance in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae through diverse genetic adaptations: a genomic, retrospective cohort study RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and postanalysis of large phylogenies Using ggtree to visualize data on tree-like structures Emergence of ceftazidimeavibactam resistance and restoration of carbapenem susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae: a case report and review of literature In vitro selection of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Enterobacteriaceae with KPC-3 carbapenemase Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in three New York City hospitals trended downwards from