key: cord-1051697-7oh22thk authors: Afshari, Afsoon; Janfeshan, Sahar; Yaghobi, Ramin; Roozbeh, Jamshid; Azarpira, Negar title: Covid-19 pathogenesis in prostatic cancer and TMPRSS2-ERG regulatory genetic pathway date: 2020-12-07 journal: Infect Genet Evol DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104669 sha: 3b97b7dd89251387c08e2f42da88a7c3d4386a92 doc_id: 1051697 cord_uid: 7oh22thk Members of Coronaviridae family have been the source of respiratory illnesses. The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 that produced a severe lung disease in afflicted patients in China and other countries was the reason for the incredible attention paid toward this viral infection. It is known that SARS-CoV-2 is dependent on TMPRSS2 activity for entrance and subsequent infection of the host cells and TMPRSS2 is a host cell molecule that is important for the spread of viruses such as coronaviruses. Different factors can increase the risk of prostate cancer, including older age, a family history of the disease. Androgen receptor (AR) initiates a transcriptional cascade which plays a serious role in both normal and malignant prostate tissues. TMPRSS2 protein is highly expressed in prostate secretory epithelial cells, and its expression is dependent on androgen signals. One of the molecular signs of prostate cancer is TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion. In TMPRSS2-ERG-positive prostate cancers different patterns of changed gene expression can be detected. The possible molecular relation between fusion positive prostate cancer patients and the increased risk of lethal respiratory viral infections especially SARS-CoV-2 can candidate TMPRSS2 as an attractive drug target. The studies show that some molecules such as nicotinamide, PARP1, ETS and IL-1R can be studied deeper in order to control SARS-CoV-2 infection especially in prostate cancer patients. This review attempts to investigate the possible relation between the gene expression pattern that is produced through TMPRSS2-ERG fusion positive prostate cancer and the possible influence of these fluctuations on the pathogenesis and development of viral infections such as SARS-CoV-2. prostatic epitheliums. Furthermore, ERG is a member of the E-twenty-six (ETS) family, which are known to be the main regulators of differentiation, apoptosis, embryonic development, cell proliferation and inflammation [11] . Both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV are able to enter into the cells through endocytosis and are activated after entrance by using the cathepsin in endosomes [12] , moreover, it is documented that expression of TMPRSS2 increases the replication and consequently the formation of these viruses in vitro and in vivo [13] . Also, it has been shown that TMPRSS2 might be the vital protease for new SARS-CoV-2 replication and many researches propose that this molecule can be a promising candidate for controlling the new virus [11] . SARS-CoV-2 spread also depends on TMPRSS2 activity [14] . Also, TMPRSS2-ERG is recognized as an important factor in fusion-positive PCa and this fusion protein causes changes in gene expression level. Therefore, this review article aims to gather the important facts in order to address the possibility of the relation of prostate cancer to the increased pathogenicity of SARS-CoV2. Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed male cancer and is the second cause of cancer deaths in North America [15] . Androgen receptor (AR) starts a cascade of transcriptional programs which in normal and malignant prostate tissue have a critical role in growth and survival. In order to cure the locally advanced, relapsed, or metastatic prostate cancer, the treatment regimens are based on inhibiting AR activity and function in patients. Although this method seemed to be effective at first, it could not completely cure the cancer and, further, a resistant form of prostate cancer to hormonal manipulations appears. There is increasing evidence that suggests AR through aberrant mechanisms can retain its activity and many of the AR target genes that are increasingly expressed for maintenance of prostate cancer development are still expressed [16] . Consequently, failure to treat the prostate cancer results in metastasizing into the bones and lymph nodes in advanced cancers. Therefore, the treatment is composed of antagonizing the AR stimulus in order to stop feeding the tumor via chemical or surgical hormone ablation therapy [17] . In some cases, antiandrogen therapy results in the development of AR-independent cancer. It is observed that some AR-regulated genes such as PSA (prostate-specific antigen), that had decreased due to hormone ablation therapy, increase again in AR-independent tumors [18] and accessory pathways such as TKR (tyrosine kinase receptors) are activated as an alternative to the androgen signal [19] . The normal prostate is composed of three different regions. The cells of these zones vary considerably in their tendency to contributing to prostate cancer. For instance, 20% of prostate adenocarcinomas are related to transition zone that comprises 5%-10% of glandular tissue. The central zone cells rarely contribute to prostate cancer (1-5%) and involves about 25% of glandular tissue. Finally, the peripheral zone that is responsible for about 70% of cancers composes the majority of prostate tissue (70%) [16] . such as PSA [20] . By the way, the majority of prostate cancers revert to a resistant form that is unaffected by these hormonal manipulations, and further treatment is inevitably needed [21] . The disease at this stage is denoted as androgen depletion-independent (ADI), androgen-independent, or androgen-refractory [22] . Although ADI prostate cancer is resistant to additional efforts for blocking androgen action, the AR still remains a critical issue for the growth and development of most of these tumors and the majority of ADI prostate cancers has high levels of AR expression and also, further expression of PSA [23] . Research findings propose that ADI prostate cancer cells continue to proliferate and survive through aberrant mechanisms of AR activation, and therefore the AR signaling axis continues to be a critical target for therapy [16] . Androgens are a group of molecules that apply their functions through AR. Leydig cells in the testes are responsible for testosterone production which is the most abundant (90%) androgen in the blood circulation. Androgens produced by the adrenal cortex, such as dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and androstenedione (4-dione), make up the remaining 10%. Both DHEA and 4-dione are converted to testosterone in peripheral tissues [24] . The AR is a 110 kDa phosphoprotein and member of the nuclear receptor transcription factor superfamily and are essential for normal development and function of prostate. Also this molecule shares a communal modular structure with other nuclear receptors, containing an N-terminal transactivation domain, a central DNA binding domain, and a Cterminal ligand binding/transactivation domain [25] . Activation of AR consequently renders, to the testicular synthesis of testosterone, its transport to target tissues, and the conversion by 5α-reductase type I and II to the more active metabolite 5dihydrotestosterone (DHT) [26] . DHT is a more effective AR ligand than testosterone since it dissociates more gradually from the AR and produces a receptor conformation more resilient to degradation [25] . In detail, by binding to AR, testosterone and DHT exert their biological effects via AR transcriptional activity. The AR activity is modulated by the interaction with coregulators and also, phosphorylation of AR and its coregulators [27, 28] . After attaching to androgen, a modification in the conformation and composition of AR happens, which leads to AR nuclear translocation. In the nucleus, the AR binds androgen response elements (AREs) as a dimer in the promoter and enhancer regions of various target genes [25] (Figure 1 ). Some of the coactivators are also vital for transcriptional activation of other steroid hormone receptors, such as the p160 family (SRC-1, GRIP1/ TIF2, RAC3/ pCIP/ ACTR/ AIB1/ TRAM1), P/CAF, CBP, and p300 [21] . These coactivators possess intrinsic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, which can be directed towards histone as well as other proteins [29] . In addition to coactivators with HAT activity, the AR has been shown to specifically recruit the AR-associated (ARA) coactivators ARA70, ARA55, and ARA54 [21] . The AR-induced assembly of these multiprotein complexes results in a finely regulated level of target gene transcription [16] . Studies indicate that by any method for treatment of prostate cancer (such as treatment with LHRH agonists and surgical castration) the serum levels of testosterone decrease about 90-95% while the intraprostatic DHT levels decline by roughly 50% [30] . Though this decrease is able to bring about J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof the death of more than 70% of normal prostate secretory epithelial cells, the surviving prostate cancer cells would be exposed to a relative abundance of DHT. In contrast, GnRH agonist treatment has been described to cause reduction in intraprostatic DHT, about 90% [31] . Combined treatment of castration and flutamide has been found to reduce prostate DHT levels to approximately 20% of pretreatment levels [32] . Recognition of the TMPRSS2 gene that is a transmembrane serine protease was the result of using a subtractive hybridization method [33] . TMPRSS2 is a type II transmembrane protein that has an extracellular COOH terminus containing the protease domain and an intracellular NH2 terminus [34] . TMPRSS2 protein is vastly expressed in prostate secretory epithelium and in prostate cancer and the protein expression is also dependent on an androgen signal. The protease domain is released via an autocatalytic cleavage mechanism. Studies demonstrate that the highest expression of TMPRSS2 is at the apical side of prostate and prostate cancer secretory epithelia and within the lumen of the glands. Also, it was detected in colon cancer and pancreas samples. Collectively, data reveal that TMPRSS2 is a secreted protease that is highly expressed in prostate and prostate cancer, making it a possible target for diagnosis and therapy of cancer [35] . The usual molecular sign of prostate cancer is TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions. Although remarkable advances have been made in unraveling various facets of TMPRSS2-ERG-positive prostate cancer, many unanswered questions still remain to be answered and further studies in order to elucidate the detailed function of TMPRSS2-ERG target genes and proteins in response to numerous stimuli in TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-positive prostate cancer cells are needed [36] (Figure 1 ). Studies have shown that the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion seems to be detectable in both late stage and benign hyperplasia as well as in the normal margin of prostate tumors [37] [38] [39] . Furthermore, detection of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcript was reported in 73% and 43% of primary prostate tumor samples and samples collected from non-malignant tissues, respectively [40] .Incidentally, in normal and malignant prostate cells, the level of this fusion protein is different and even the level of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcript varies in different established prostate cancer cell lines (human prostate cancer VCaP and LNCaP cells are TMPRSS2-ERG positive and negative, respectively). Also, methylation of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene is a determinative factor in regulating the expression level of this molecule. For instance, fusion negative tumors are severely methylated in comparison to fusion positive ones [41] . Various signal transduction cascades were deregulated in fusion-positive prostate cancer patients. Development of PCa would be facilitated through a sequence of explicit genetic alterations that might be summarized as early clonal expansion, genomic instability, inactivation of tumor suppressor (TS) genes, oncogenes overexpression, and distraction of the spatial-temporal function of signaling cascades [42] . As previously mentioned, the gene fusion in chromosome 21 that happens between the TMPRSS2 and ERG genes, results in the prostate cancers being divided into "fusion-positive" and "fusion-negative" [43] . This causes the expression of ERG transcription factor (TF) to be regulated via TMPRSS2 (an androgen responsive element) promoter. Therefore, TMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein might attach to ERG gene promoter and cause the overexpression of wild-type ERG. However, this process is also regulated by polycomb proteins that can control the hypermethylation of ERG promoters. The data cause ERG gene to appear as a hotspot of DNA methylation, especially in prostate cancer cells [44] . To illustrate the exact function of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein several studies have been carried out. It was reported that in VCaP cells, targeted inhibition of TMPRSS2-ERG transcript is the reason of the remarkable decrease of ERG, while the result of constant transfection of TMPRSS2-ERG in the TMPRSS2-ERG deficient PC3 cells, was detected as an increase in ERG transcript. These data offer obvious evidence of ERG overexpression in fusion positive prostate cancer cells [45] . Furthermore, direct evidences that support the idea of regulation of AR by ERG protein exist. In ERG-negative and normal ERG expressing prostate cancer cells, the signaling pathway that is activated ERG does not impose repressive effect on the expression of AR [46] . But another study showed that in prostate cancer VCaP cells, ERG can suppress AR expression level by binding to AR [47] . In addition, TMPRSS2-ERG fusion recruits in normal and also tumor cells after androgen treatment [48] . In a research, by culturing xenografts of male nude mice in vivo via serial transplantation the correlation between TMPRSS2-ERG fusion and androgen was investigated and overexpression of TMPRSS2-ERG was detected in all androgen-dependent xenografts. More importantly, they observed that although AR-negative tumors have the gene encoding for TMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein, this fusion gene has no expression [49] . Moreover, genes related to WNT and TGFB1/BMP (transforming growth factor beta 1/bone morphogenetic protein) transduction cascades are detected to be overexpressed in prostate tumors [50] . Furthermore, in the process of genomic rearrangements during development of prostate cancer tumors, some tumor suppressor genes including BRCA1 (breast cancer 1, early onset) and BRCA2, p53, PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) are activated [51] . The next section gives a more detailed discussion of this subject (Figure 1 ). In comparison to TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-negative prostate cancer cells, some proliferation-related genes were observed with an increase in expression level in fusion-positive ones. Furthermore, although some treatments such as anti-androgen therapies and chemical castration are able to somehow reduce the expression level of some of these genes, these treatments seem to be inadequate [52] . Research to better understand the biology of prostate cancer has elucidated that ERG up-regulation is zone-dependent and has been shown to be overexpressed in the glands of the peripheral zone rather than the transitional zone [53] . Furthermore, analysis of the expression level of deregulated genes specified that the expression level of these genes in fusion-negative prostate tumor cells is more comparable to normal controls. At the same time, the expression level of gene expression in fusion-positive prostate tumors displayed a different and dissimilar pattern that correlated with the occurrence of fusion transcripts in prostate cancer. For example, ERG expression pattern was related J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof to expression level of MMP9 (Metalloproteinase 9) and Plexin A2 that are engaged in the migratory potential and invasive capacity of cancerous cells [54] , for more details, Table 1 summarizes the difference in expression level of genes in normal, fusion positive and fusion negative cells. The results in Table 1 elucidates how TMPRSS2-ERG encoded fusion proteins are able to impair checkpoints of the cell cycle and promote proliferation. Previously, it was shown that overexpression of AR might cause antiandrogen resistance by amplifying signal output and changing the common response to antagonists [55] . However, it is also imperative to mention that the loss of AR regulating miRNA signatures is a central aspect that underlies AR overexpression. For instance, it has been reported that androgen-induced AR binds to the miR-21 promoter, suggesting direct regulation transcription process and considerable prostate carcinogenesis. Nevertheless, miR-21 inhibition resulted in uncontrolled cellular proliferation decrease [56] . Also, a study has indicated that various miRNAs act as tumor suppressors and transiently transfecting cells with miR-331-3p reduced phosphorylated v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (AKT1) content [57] . Additionally, another important receptor, the ERBB2 (v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2, neuro/glioblastoma derived oncogene homolog) is dysregulated in prostate cancer. It was reported that overexpression of ERBB2 activated AR pathway in an androgendeficient environment in cancer cells [58] . Another research group has indicated that ERBB2/ERBB3 can maintain AR protein levels and ERBB2/ERBB3 were found to be attached to the promoter/enhancer of androgen-regulated genes in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. ERBB2 and ERBB3 considerably increase the androgen-dependent AR transactivation of reporter genes in prostate cancer cells [59] . Therefore, using miR-331-3p that can repress ERBB2 expression by targeting the U-rich element located in the ERBB2 3'-UTR (untranslated region), the expression of ERBB2 was suppressed. Further studies demonstrated that in TMPRSS2-ERG positive prostate cancer cells this miRNA mediated regulation is lost and results in the AR and ERBB2 expression which cooperatively prompt the expression of cancer promoting genes [60] . It was observed that ERG can control the migratory potential of prostate cancer cells through binding to the promoter region of CXCR4 and ADAMTS1 (ADAM metallopeptidase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, 1) genes [61] . By the way, it is reported that CXCR4 expression can be suppressed by miR-139. Therefore, dysregulation of miR-139 negative control in cancer cells (that is proved to happen gastric cancer cells by interaction of ERBB2 with CD44) might result in increased risk of cancer [62] . Another microRNA that deals with AR is miR-23a27a24-2 cluster, whose maturation from pri-miR-23a27a24-2 to mature pre-miR-23a27a24-2 is controlled partially by association of AR to its promoter that leads to starting temporary transcription via enhanced androgen-induced processing. Particularly, miR-27a negatively regulates AR by controlling prohibitin (a corepressor) and due to its ability is perceived as a promising candidate for treatment of PCa [63] . Some other microRNAs that can downregulate the transcriptional activity of AR, are miR-488 and miR-let-7c [64] . Also, three microRNAs named miR-130a, -203 and -205, cooperative in order to J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof target the members of MAPK (mitogen activated kinase-like protein) and AR pathway of signaling [65] . Furthermore, HNRNPK (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K) and VEGF-A are directly targeted by miR-205 and miR-29b, respectively [66] . These genes are able to cooperatively inhibit translation of AR [67] . Similarly, CD44 and AKT2 are direct targets of miR-708 [68] . Finally, some reports have proved that different miRNA subsets modulate PTEN, that results in retaining AKT cancer promoting ability. PTEN that is negatively regulated by miR-153 and miR-21 [69] in prostate cancer, is observed to be the target of other miRNAs in other cancers such as: miR-21, miR-221 and miR-222 in gastric cancer [70] ; miR-93 in ovarian cancer [71] ; miR-519d in liver cancer [72] . There are other miRNAs that can regulate the transcriptional activity of AR and its target genes such as miR-29a and miR-1256 that in their demethylated status target TRIM68 (tripartite motif containing 68). Then, TRIM68 interacts with AR and enhances transcriptional activity of the AR target genes [73] . The entrance of coronaviruses is facilitated by spike (S) protein. This protein is composed of two parts, S1 and S2. The S protein is cleaved at the S1/S2 and the S2' sites and the result of priming the S protein is S1 and S2. S1 part is responsible for binding the virus to the host cell surface and S2 allows fusion of viral and cellular membranes [5] (Figure 2) . The entry receptor of host cells which is related to this process is angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS which uses the cellular enzyme TMPRSS2 (a serine protease) for S protein priming [8, 74] . SARS-CoV infects primarily macrophages and pneumocytes in the lung. However, ACE2 expression is not limited to the lung, and extrapulmonary spread of SARS-CoV in ACE2+ tissues, was observed [75] . As the SARS-S and SARS-2-S share 76% amino acid identity in their sequences, it seems that SARS-2-S might use the same entrance mechanism (ACE2 and TMPRSS2) for entry to the host cells [5] . It seems that SARSCoV-2 in comparison to SARS-CoV, is more transmissible, and this might be related to the higher efficiency of SARSCoV-2 in cellular attachment that renders robust infection of ACE2+ cells in the upper respiratory tract [76] . By the way, it is important to consider that SARS-s has the ability to downregulate ACE2 expression that in normal condition protects lung from injury. This regulation might have promoting effects in the disease progression. If SARS-CoV-2 is able to undergo this regulatory pattern, it would be the other reason for its greater pathogenicity [77] . Coronavirus S proteins priming that is organized by host cell proteases is critical for entry of viral particles into the host cells. The proteases cleave S protein into S1 and S2 parts via several arginine residues (multibasic) which are characteristic of cleavage sites at S1/S2 and S2' priming positions of SARS-2-S that confer high cleavability potential to the sites (Fig-2) . Owing to this efficient cleavability, SARS-2-S is efficiently cleaved, and cleaved S proteins incorporates into VSV particles. It seems important to mention that this effective multibasic cleavage site does not exist in J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f RaTG13 coronavirus (most closely related to SARS-CoV-2) and might be a critical advantage for SARS-S2 pathogenicity due to effective entrance to the host cells [78] . In TMPRSS2-cells SARS-CoV can use CatB/L enzyme which is an endosomal protease for S protein priming [79] . But it is important to consider that S protein priming by TMPRSS2 and not CatB/L is crucial for viral entrance to target cells and is also spread in the infected host cells [14] . Studies indicate that SARS-CoV-2 is dependent on TMPRSS2 activity for entrance and subsequent infection of the host cells. Altogether, it seems that TMPRSS2 is a host cell factor that is important for the spread of some clinically related viruses such as coronaviruses and influenza A viruses [8, 80, 81] . However, TMPRSS2 seems to be a dispensable factor for development and homeostasis in host cell [82] . Therefore, this criterion makes it an attractive drug target candidate. In this regard, camostat mesylate is a serine protease inhibitor that can block TMPRSS2 activity and has been approved in Japan for an unrelated indication previously [81, 83] . Moreover, convalescent SARS patients exhibit a neutralizing antibody response that can be detected even 24 months after infection and that is largely directed against the S protein [84]. It is known that TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion has been assessed as a specific biomarker for PCa [10] . Also, it was determined that both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, are able to enter into the cells by the help of TMPRSS2-ERG gene and furthermore, it is documented that expression of TMPRSS2 increases the replication and consequently formation of these viruses in vitro and in vivo [13, 85] . Additionally, it has been shown that TMPRSS2 might be the vital protease for new SARS-CoV-2 replication and a great deal of research propose that this molecule can be a promising candidate for controlling the new virus [11] . As the SARS-S and SARS-2-S share 76% amino acid identity in their sequences, it seems that SARS-2-S might use the same entrance mechanism (ACE2 and TMPRSS2) for entry to the host cells [5] . The high expression rate of TMPRSS2-ERG in different tissue parts and cells of normal and cancerous prostate such as apical side, secretory epithelia and within the lumen of the glands make this molecule a promising target for cancer therapy and diagnosis [35] . Therefore, understanding the activation and repressing effect of this molecule on other target genes and proteins in response to several stimuli might be sequentially gathered and re-interpreted [36] . A lot of hard work is being directed towards the identification of molecules that can be helpful in the management of COVID-19. As previously mentioned, TMPRSS2-ERG fusion molecule would increase in both fusion-positive and negative types of prostate cancers [37] [38] [39] and this change seems to make these patients better candidates for SARS-CoV-2 disease. Furthermore, elevation in infected males with androgen related baldness to SARS-CoV-2 disease [86] might certify the possible role of this molecule in facilitating the SARS-CoV-2 infections development in these patients. Additionally, researches show that genes' expression during prostate cancer are affected by TMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein, and might have some relation to viral respiratory infections. As an illustration, peroxiredoxins such as PRDX3 and 4 are a ubiquitous family of antioxidant enzymes that can regulate cytokine-induced peroxide levels and thus interfere in signal transduction. In Journal Pre-proof infected cells with respiratory viruses, redox homeostasis show changes which are linked to inflammation and subsequent tissue damage. The virus can induce the production of ROS (reactive oxygen species) which disturb the host balance of redox. These imbalances are central triggers of inflammation in various ways, for instance, by induction of ROS-generating enzymes and disturbance of antioxidant defense. Nevertheless, our knowledge about the systematic mechanism of virus-associated oxidative stress and the following consequences for cells, tissue, and the organism is not enough. Many conflicting data on the antioxidant defense status and role of ROS in viral propagation exist and need to be resolved based on in vitro as well as clinical studies [87] . ADP-ribosylation that is a post-translational modification, enables the host response to virus infection. Several viruses, as well as all members of the coronavirus family, encode a macrodomain to inverse ADP-ribosylation and fight this immune response. As such, viruses with mutations in the macrodomain are highly attenuated and cause minimal disease in vivo [88] . Gharote et al propose nicotinamide to be a potential PARP inhibitor and is helpful in prevention of cytokine storm in the lung parenchyma cells. Furthermore, they suggest that high doses of nicotinamide might moderate the outcome in COVID-19 [89] . Furthermore, in primary prostate epithelial cells the upregulation ETS induce DNA double strand breaks that simplifies the ERG fusion potential. Then, the reverse process conducted by the usage of inhibition of PARP causes response to DNA damage in ETS-positive cancer cells [90] . As IL-1 is an inflammatory cytokine, that has a partial role in cytokine storm production during SARS-CoV-2 infection [91] , increase in IL-1 receptors might help in development of infection. Assays revealed that TMPRSS2-ERG contain possible binding sites in promoters of IL1R2, SPINT1 and ZEB1 genes. TMPRSS2-ERG directly trans-activates ZEB1 while SPINT1 trans-activates and IL1R2 trans-represses trigger ZEB2 expression in a direct manner [92] . Another study found that the expression of ACE2 is limited to population of epithelial cells and is repressed by ZEB1. Also, ZEB1 plays a role in promoting the transition of epithelial cells to mesenchymal ones (EMT). Remarkably, during the infection of lung cancer cells, SARS-CoV-2 metabolic and transcriptional changes consistent with EMT are induced, which results in upregulation of ZEB1, and downregulation of ACE2. These data suggest that a novel model of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis might possibly exist by which the cells that are infected by virus shift toward a progressive state of mesenchymal and lose ACE2 expression, along with its acute respiratory distress syndrome-protective effect, in a ZEB1-dependent manner. It is also recommended that reduction of ZEB1 (as with bemcentinib), might offer a possible strategy to reverse this effect [93] . Wnt/β-catenin signaling is an essential pathway in cell cycle control. Previously, dysregulation of this pathway during viral infection has been reported. More et al, examined the effect of modulating this signaling pathway during influenza virus infection. The in vitro experiments in mouse lung epithelial E10 cells showed that this pathway is activated by Wnt3a during influenza infection and results in virus mRNA and viral particle production increase [94] . Pim1 is an oncogenic serine/threonine kinase. TMPRSS2-ERG can directly attach to the PIM1 promoter. Cyclin B1 modification is the consequence of overexpression of PIM1 through J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f TMPRSS2-ERG upregulation [95] . During HCV infection, NS5A protein might interact with Pim1 which contributes to Pim1 protein stability. This NS5A produced protein stability may be associated with HCV pathogenesis considering the fact that the expression level of Pim1 protein increases in many cancers. It is presented that Pim kinase is specifically essential for early entrance step of the HCV life cycle. Thus, it is suggested that Pim kinase acts as both an HCV cell entry factor and also as a new anti-HCV therapeutic target [96] . An in vitro approach showed infected PBECs (primary bronchial epithelial cells) from healthy participants with HRV-16 (human rhinovirus-16) in the absence or presence of a highly specific pharmacological inhibitor for Pim1 kinase. Previously, it was perceived that Pim1 kinase is highly expressed in the bronchial airway epithelium and therefore, pharmacological inhibition of Pim1 kinase increases the sensitivity of bronchial epithelial cells to cell death upon challenge with cigarette smoke extract. This study showed that by inhibiting Pim1 kinase activity, the viral replication and even release of viral particles in cultured PBECs reduces by developing the induction of cell death during viral infection [97] . It was found that ERG expression level was associated with the overexpression of ILK and thus, its downstream effector such as LEF1. Therefore, targeted inhibition of ERG might result in downregulation of the ILK and LEF1 gene expressions [98] . CVB3 (coxsackievirus B3) virus is known to be the most common agent for myocarditis. A study, reported that in CVB3-infected patients, inhibition of ILK cells increased the viability of infected cells significantly, which caused delay in viral replication and release. Complementary experiments revealed that the observed protective effect of ILK inhibition is dependent on the associated downregulation of virus-induced Akt activation. This study may convey new insights in trying to characterize an innovative therapeutic target for treatment of enteroviral myocarditis [99] (Figure 3 ). In PCa, androgen signaling usually regulates the expression level of genes associated with cancer cell increase and survival. Although androgen deprivation therapy is an alternative for the patients, by the way, the tumors that relapse and undergo castration therapy generally act as resistant prostate cancer phenotype that correlates with terrible analysis and excessive metastatic potential. Furthermore, androgen signaling has been involved in cancerous prostate cellular invasion and metastasis. Additionally, the expression level of TMPRSS2 protein has been strongly correlated with prostate cancers development. Still, the actual TMPRSS2 substrates and TMPRSS2 primary proteolytic cascade remain to be understood, and the precise function of TMPRSS2 in cancers progression continues to be unclear. The association between TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene and the prognosis of prostate cancers has been detected and it is proposed that TMPRSS2-ERG be used as the gold standard biomarker for diagnosis and stratification of PCa. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. Funding: This study was supported by Shiraz university of medical sciences (grant No. 22358-106-01-99). Funding sources had no influence over study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation or manuscript preparation and submission. Coronaviruses as the cause of respiratory infections Middle East Respiratory Syndrome: Emergence of a Pathogenic Human Coronavirus SARS and MERS: Recent insights into emerging coronaviruses Structural biology: Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Science (80-) SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. The Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2020 A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster Efficient Activation of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein by the Transmembrane Protease TMPRSS2 TMPRSS2: ERG gene fusion predicts subsequent detection of prostate cancer in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia Association between TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene and the prostate cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis TMPRSS2 Met160Val polymorphism: Significant association with sporadic prostate cancer, but not with latent prostate cancer in Japanese men Prospective multicentre evaluation of PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions as diagnostic and prognostic urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer TMPRSS2 Contributes to Virus Spread and Immunopathology in the Airways of Murine Models after Coronavirus Infection Molecular regulation of androgen action in prostate cancer Androgens and prostate cancer: Biology, pathology and hormonal therapy Effects of Intermittent Androgen Suppression on Androgen-Dependent Tumors From HER2/Neu signal cascade to androgen receptor and its coactivators: A novel pathway by induction of androgen target genes through MAP kinase in prostate cancer cells The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer Androgen Receptor Signaling in Androgen-Refractory Prostate Cancer Androgens and prostate cancer: Are the descriptors valid? Is the Achilles' heel for prostate cancer therapy a gain of function in androgen receptor signaling DHEA and its transformation into androgens and estrogens in peripheral target tissues: Intracrinology. Front Neuroendocrinol Androgen receptor in prostate cancer Transition to androgenindependence in prostate cancer Contribution of the androgen receptor to prostate cancer predisposition and progression. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews Androgen receptor (AR) coregulators: An overview Endocrine Treatment in Prostate Cancer Three-month treatment with a long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Effects on tissue androgen concentration, 5α-reductase activity and androgen receptor content Novel Cardiac Precursor-Like Cells from Human Menstrual Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Cells Prostate-localized and androgen-regulated expression of the membrane-bound serine protease TMPRSS2 Catalytic Cleavage of the Androgen-Regulated TMPRSS2 Protease Results in Its Secretion by Prostate and Prostate Cancer Epithelia -PubMed Androgen receptor and gene network: Micromechanics reassemble the signaling machinery of TMPRSS2-ERG positive prostate cancer cells Tumour heterogeneity and drug resistance: Personalising cancer medicine through functional genomics Intra-tumour heterogeneity: A looking glass for cancer? Nature Reviews Cancer To differentiate or not-routes towards metastasis Diversity of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts in the human prostate Genome-wide DNA methylation events in TMPRSS2-ERG fusion-negative prostate cancers implicate an EZH2-dependent mechanism with miR-26a hypermethylation APC, signal transduction and genetic instability in colorectal cancer ETS gene fusions in prostate cancer A DNA methylation microarray-based study identifies ERG as a gene commonly methylated in prostate cancer TMPRSS2-ERG-mediated feed-forward regulation of wild-type ERG in human prostate cancers ERG immunohistochemistry is not predictive for PSA recurrence, local recurrence or overall survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer An Integrated Network of Androgen Receptor, Polycomb, and TMPRSS2-ERG Gene Fusions in Prostate Cancer Progression Androgeninduced TMPRSS2:ERG fusion in nonmalignant prostate epithelial cells TMPRSS2:ERG fusion by translocation or interstitial deletion is highly relevant in androgendependent prostate cancer, but is bypassed in late-stage androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer TMPRSS2-ERG -specific transcriptional modulation is associated with prostate cancer biomarkers and TGF-β signaling Chromosome rearrangement associated inactivation of tumour suppressor genes in prostate cancer Chemical castration and anti-androgens induce differential gene expression in prostate cancer The peripheral zone of the prostate is more prone to tumor development than the transitional zone: Is the ETS family the key Identification of novel TMPRSS2:ERG mechanisms in prostate cancer metastasis: Involvement of MMP9 and PLXNA2. Oncogene Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy miR-21: An androgen receptor-regulated microRNA that promotes hormone-dependent and hormoneindependent prostate cancer growth miR-331-3p regulates ERBB-2 expression and androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer Androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells Heregulin-induced activation of HER2 and HER3 increases androgen receptor transactivation and CWR-R1 human recurrent prostate cancer cell growth The RNA-binding protein HuR opposes the repression of ERBB-2 gene expression by microRNA miR-331-3p in prostate cancer cells Aberrant ERG expression cooperates with loss of PTEN to promote cancer progression in the prostate HER2 interacts with CD44 to upregulate CXCR4 via epigenetic silencing of microRNA-139 in gastric cancer cells Androgen-regulated processing of the oncomir miR-27a, which targets Prohibitin in prostate cancer MicroRNA let-7c suppresses androgen receptor expression and activity via regulation of myc expression in prostate cancer cells MiR-130a, miR-203 and miR-205 jointly repress key oncogenic pathways and are downregulated in prostate carcinoma Identification of ZNF217, hnRNP-K, VEGF-A and IPO7 as targets for microRNAs that are downregulated in prostate carcinoma Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K is a novel regulator of androgen receptor translation MiRNA-708 control of CD44+ prostate cancer-initiating cells microRNA-21 promotes tumor proliferation and invasion in gastric cancer by targeting PTEN Involvement of microRNA-93, a new regulator of PTEN/Akt signaling pathway, in regulation of chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer cells In hepatocellular carcinoma miR-519d is up-regulated by p53 and DNA hypomethylation and targets CDKN1A/p21, PTEN, AKT3 and TIMP2 Epigenetic deregulation of miR-29a and miR-1256 by isoflavone contributes to the inhibition of prostate cancer cell growth and invasion Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus Multiple organ infection and the pathogenesis of SARS Stem cells and liver engineering Modulation of TNF-α-converting enzyme by the spike protein of SARS-CoV and ACE2 induces TNF-α production and facilitates viral entry Trypsin Treatment Unlocks Barrier for Zoonotic Bat Coronavirus Infection Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry The Spike Protein of the Emerging Betacoronavirus EMC Uses a Novel Coronavirus Receptor for Entry, Can Be Activated by TMPRSS2, and Is Targeted by Neutralizing Antibodies Protease inhibitors targeting coronavirus and filovirus entry Phenotypic Analysis of Mice Lacking the Tmprss2-Encoded Protease Simultaneous Treatment of Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells with Serine and Cysteine Protease Inhibitors Prevents Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Entry Two-Year Prospective Study of the Humoral Immune Response of Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome A microfluidic localized, multiple cell culture array using vacuum actuated cell seeding: integrated anticancer drug testing A preliminary observation: Male pattern hair loss among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Spain -A potential clue to the role of androgens in COVID-19 severity Redox biology of respiratory viral infections The coronavirus macrodomain is required to prevent PARP-mediated inhibition of virus replication and enhancement of IFN expression Role of poly (ADP) ribose polymerase-1 inhibition by nicotinamide as a possible additive treatment to modulate host immune response and prevention of cytokine storm in COVID-19 Mechanistic Rationale for Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in ETS Gene Fusion-Positive Prostate Cancer The pathogenesis and treatment of the 'Cytokine Storm'' in COVID-19 TMPRSS2/ERG promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition through the ZEB1/ZEB2 axis in a prostate cancer model SARS-CoV-2 infection induces EMT-like molecular changes, including ZEB1-mediated repression of the viral receptor ACE2, in lung cancer models. bioRxiv. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Regulation of influenza virus replication by Wnt/β-catenin signaling ERG deregulation induces PIM1 over-expression and aneuploidy in prostate epithelial cells Pim Kinase Interacts with Nonstructural 5A Protein and Regulates Hepatitis C Virus Entry Inhibition of Pim1 kinase reduces viral replication in primary bronchial epithelial cells Integrin-linked kinase as a target for ERG-mediated invasive properties in prostate cancer models Coxsackievirus B3 activates nuclear factor kappa B transcription factor via a kinase/protein kinase B-dependent pathway to improve host cell viability The authors wish to thank Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for the support and funding preparation.