key: cord-1048152-l45s9m7q
authors: Grimmett, Eddie; Al-Share, Bayan; Alkassab, Mohamad Basem; Zhou, Ryan Weng; Desai, Advait; Rahim, Mir Munir A.; Woldie, Indryas
title: Cancer vaccines: past, present and future; a review article
date: 2022-05-16
journal: Discov Oncol
DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00491-4
sha: 4431ef1b94c94e2d640cfb6ce28f22c9a3eadf6d
doc_id: 1048152
cord_uid: l45s9m7q

Immunotherapy and vaccines have revolutionized disease treatment and prevention. Vaccines against infectious diseases have been in use for several decades. In contrast, only few cancer vaccines have been approved for human use. These include preventative vaccines against infectious agents associated with cancers, and therapeutic vaccines used as immunotherapy agents to treat cancers. Challenges in developing cancer vaccines include heterogeneity within and between cancer types, screening and identification of appropriate tumour-specific antigens, and the choice of vaccine delivery platforms. Recent advances in all of these areas and the lessons learnt from COVID-19 vaccines have significantly boosted interest in cancer vaccines. Further advances in these areas are expected to facilitate development of effective novel cancer vaccines. In this review, we aim to discuss the past, the present, and the future of cancer vaccines.

Immunization has been practiced for hundreds of years starting with the use of snake venom to protect from snakebite to the development of smallpox vaccine in 1978. However, few vaccines have been effective in reducing cancer incidences in a population and in treating cancers. The past few years have seen tremendous breakthrough in vaccine technology, including the most recent use of nucleic acid vaccines against COVID-19 infection, and the development of cancer immunotherapy. Further advances in cancer vaccine technology are predicted in the future, which are discussed in this review.

A full description of the immune system is beyond the scope of this review article. However, to better understand the concepts of immunotherapy and vaccines, we provide a brief overview of the immune system and its association with cancer immunity. The immune system is an integrated system of soluble molecules, cells, tissues, and organs that is capable of recognizing an invading antigen and initiating a cascade of responses that ultimately lead to the elimination of the foreign antigen. The ability to distinguish foreign versus self-antigens is a hallmark feature of the immune system. Based on the recognition mechanisms, the effector cells involved, and the speed at which effector mechanisms are elicited, immune responses can be broadly categorized into innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Innate immunity is present at birth and provides a generalized immediate response to foreign invaders [1] . The effector cells of the innate immune system including natural killer (NK) cells, neutrophils, macrophages, etc. Cells of the innate immune system T cell Lymphoma Antigen 4 (CTLA 4) and Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) molecules. Although response rate was low (10-15%) and toxicity was significant, high dose IL-2 offered durable remission for the few responding patients [15] .

Discovered by Pierre Goldstein in 1987, CTLA-4 is expressed on T cells after activation and its physiologic role is to suppress T cell responses. It is also referred to as a brake to the immune system or immune checkpoint. Following the observation of tumour shrinkage in mice treated with CTLA-4 antibodies, the monoclonal antibody to CTLA-4, Ipilimumab was developed for human use [16] . Ipilimumab was approved by the FDA in 2011 for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma. The approval was based on the phase III double blind study that showed overall response rate of 10.9% with 60% maintaining the response for at least 2 years. Immune related toxicity was seen in 60% of the patients with 7 deaths attributed to immune related toxicity [17] . Although this was a great breakthrough, the low response rate, albeit durable, and high rate of immune related toxicity (20% grade III and IV) necessitated the need for safer and more effective immunotherapy drugs. The anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody therapy is still used in combination with other immunotherapy drugs in patients with metastatic melanoma [18, 19] .

PD-1 is another immune checkpoint receptor expressed on activated T cells. Following the discovery of PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 by Tasuku Honjo and Lieping Chen, respectively, it was shown (by Lieping Chen) that PD-L1 was upregulated in several cancers and blocking of the PD-L1/PD-1 interactions lead to tumour regression in mice [20] . This discovery led to development of monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 interactions to treat several types of human cancers, including renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-small cell lung cancer and others. For instance, Nivolumab, a PD-1 monoclonal antibody is approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced melanoma (Dec 22, 2014), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (Nov 23, 2015), Hodgkin's lymphoma (May 17, 2016), metastatic urothelial carcinoma (Feb 2, 2017) among others [21] . Pembrolizumab, another PD-1 monoclonal antibody is FDA approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma (Sep 4, 2014), advanced non-small cell lung cancer (Oct 2, 2015), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Aug 5, 2016), classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (Mar 15, 2017) , and advanced renal cell carcinoma (Aug 11, 2021) among others [22] .

Another fascinating progress in utilizing the immune system to eradicate cancer is the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. CAR is a genetically modified receptor that is specific for a tumour-associated antigen (TAA). Patient T cells are transfected with a viral vector containing the CAR genetic code to produce CAR T cells, which are then adoptively transferred to the patient. CAR T cells are potent immune effectors that will expand and form a long-term tumour antigen-specific immunological memory. Many versions of the CAR T cell have been developed over the years to achieve a better anti-tumour activity, proliferation capacity, and improved in vivo persistence [23] . Currently, CAR T cell therapy is FDA approved for use in a variety of hematologic malignancies, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B cell lymphoma [24] .

Despite all these success stories, cancer immunotherapy is still not curative. Further research is needed to make cancer immunotherapy more effective and safer. Based on the tremendous achievements and the progress made so far in understanding anti-cancer immune responses, it is inevitable to anticipate growing interest to further exploit the interaction between cancer and the immune system to develop additional therapeutic agents, including cancer vaccines.

initially given to infants born to infected mothers, and later extended to all infants in 1984. Subsequent studies showed a significant drop in HCC incidence in vaccinated Taiwanese children up to 20 years after the implementation of this vaccination program [27, 28] . Similar studies in Thailand, where the national neonate HBV vaccination program was implemented in the late 1980s, showed significantly lower HCC incidents in children vaccinated at birth [29] . A more impressive success story comes from the United States, where universal newborn immunization with HBV vaccine implemented in 1984 in Alaska Natives, has eliminated HCC among Alaska Native children under the age of 20 years [30] . Human papilloma virus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted virus associated with a few cancers, including cervical, oropharyngeal, anal, penile, and vulvovaginal cancers [31] . HPV vaccines are available since 2006 and is recommended as prophylactic vaccine for females and males over the age of 11 years and before the onset of sexual activity, i.e., before exposure to the virus [32]. Three HPV vaccines have been approved for prevention of HPV-related diseases in humans. HPV vaccines provide immunity against high-risk HPV types. These vaccines include the bivalent vaccine (Cervarix) against HPV types 16 and 18, the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil-4) against HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18, and the nonavalent vaccine (Gardasil-9) against HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45 52, and 58 [32] . HPV vaccines are safe, highly immunogenic in adolescence, and induce long-lasting antibody response and protection into adulthood [33] . Several phase II/III clinical trials have demonstrated high efficacy of HPV vaccines in reducing the risk of HPV-related high-grade cervical, vulvar, vaginal lesions, and genital warts in females [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] . A follow up monitoring of HPV vaccination programs in the United States and Australia targeting females aged between 11 and 26 years revealed significantly reduced HPV-related cervical lesions and abnormalities in the vaccinated compared to unvaccinated women [36, 39] . In the long term, high coverage HPV vaccination programs are expected to substantially reduce the rate of HPV-related cancers in both males and females.

No preventative vaccine for non-viral cancers has yet been approved for use in humans. This is partly due to the unavailability of appropriate TAA and the risk of cross-reaction with self-molecules on healthy tissues causing autoimmunity. However, a few TAAs have now been safely used in therapeutic vaccine trials without substantial autoimmune effects. Moreover, presence of autoantibodies against TAAs is associated with better prognosis in cancer patients and could even reduce cancer risk [40] [41] [42] , suggesting that prophylactic induction of anti-TAA immune responses in the absence of cancer could potentially reduce cancer incidence. Additionally, advances in clinical imaging and diagnostic tools have improved the early detection of cancers and pre-malignant lesions, which provides an early window for the use of protective vaccines that induces anti-cancer immunity prior to its development.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines are used as immunotherapeutic tools to treat an active disease. Only two therapeutic vaccines have been approved in cancer immunotherapy. These include Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine for treatment of early-stage bladder cancer, and Sipuleucel-T (Provenge), a dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer [43, 44] . BCG is a non-pathogenic bacterium derived from Mycobacterium bovis, which induces a protective immune response against tuberculosis caused by M. tuberculosis. It remains the only commercially available vaccine against tuberculosis [45] . The use of BCG for treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) was approved after it was shown in the mid-late 1970s that intravesical instillation of this bacterium could halt disease progression and recurrence of NMIBC [46, 47] . BCG vaccine has since been routinely used for the treatment of NMIBC, however, the precise immunological mechanisms of BCG therapy in NMIBC is unclear. The treatment consists of a weekly instillation of BCG into the bladder for 6 weeks after resection of the tumours. Patients can then enter a phase of maintenance treatment, which consists of weekly instillation of BCG vaccine into the bladder for 3-6 weeks every 3 months for 1-3 years [44] . BCG therapy is associated with some complications in the genitourinary tract, including cystitis, bladder ulceration, penile lesions, prostatitis, and kidney infection, as well as systemic complications, such as fever, disseminated infections, BCG sepsis, etc. [48] .

Sipuleucel-T vaccine is an DC-based vaccine, which uses autologous DC to stimulate cellular immune responses mediated by T cells against prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. DCs are antigen presenting cells that can efficiently induce antigen-specific priming and activation of T cell [4] . They express class I and class II HLA molecules and present processed antigenic peptide: HLA complexes to T cells. Sipuleucel-T vaccine is prepared by incubating patient DCs with a fusion protein, consisting of PAP linked to granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), to induce DC activation, processing of PAP antigenic epitopes, and expression of antigenic peptide: HLA complexes and costimulatory molecules. Activated DCs are then reinfused into the patient, which will present antigens and activate T cell responses against PAP protein [49] [50] [51] . Sipuleucel-T vaccine was approved for treatment of castrationresistant prostate cancer after phase III trails showed significantly improved median survival and decreased risk of death in patients receiving the vaccine compared to the placebo-treated group, most notable in patients with a Gleason score of 7 or less [49, 52, 53] . The treatment consists of three infusions of approximately 50 million autologous DCs given every two weeks. Adverse reactions were found to be mild in most patients and included flu-like symptoms, back pain, joint pain, muscle aches, headache, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, anemia, and dizziness [43] .

In addition to the vaccines approved for treatment of cancers, several other cancer vaccines are in various phases of clinical trial, some of which are described here. A complete list of clinical trials involving cancer vaccines can be found at clinicaltrials.gov. Amongst these, are the whole tumour cell vaccines, which use killed tumour cells to stimulate anti-cancer immune responses. The advantage of using killed tumour cells as vaccine is that they can induce immune responses against multiple tumour antigens, which do not have to be prospectively identified. Tumour cells can also be genetically modified to secret immunomodulatory cytokines, such as GM-CSF, which can promote DC activation, and enhance antigen presentation and activation of adaptive immune responses [54] . Both autologous and allogeneic tumour cell vaccines (e.g. GVAX and Vigil vaccines) engineered to produce and release GM-CSF are under investigation and have been studied as monotherapy or in combination with other immunotherapy agents in cancers including pancreatic, prostate, ovarian and colon cancer [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] . A randomized trial that tested Vigil autologous GM-CSF vaccine in the frontline maintenance for stage III-IV ovarian cancer showed relapse-free survival (RFS) clinical benefit, specifically in patients without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations [55] . Despite, inducing immune responses in patients in several trials, whole tumour cells vaccines have so far failed to show a significant therapeutic efficacy to be considered for cancer immunotherapy. Additionally, GM-CSF can induce recruitment of myeloid suppressor cells, which could adversely affect anti-cancer immune responses in the tumour microenvironment [58] . Never the less, the relative simplicity of the procedure and the range of tumour antigens provided by whole tumour vaccines make them an attractive immunotherapeutic agent. Further trials in the future are aimed at increasing immunogenicity of whole tumour vaccines to elicit protective immunity and enhanced therapeutic efficacy against cancers.

Anti-idiotypic (anti-id) vaccines, such as Racotumumab, have shown some therapeutic efficacy and have been approved in Cuba and Argentina for treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Anti-id vaccines use monoclonal antibodies that bind to antibodies specific to tumour antigens and block their interactions. Therefore, anti-id antibodies can mimic the structure of tumour antigens and elicit antigen-specific immune responses. Anti-id vaccines can be used to elicit immune responses against carbohydrate and lipid antigens, which are less immunogenic than protein antigens. Racotumumab induced immune responses against Neu-glycolyl-containing gangliosides, sulfatides, and other antigens expressed in tumours [61, 62] . Preclinical trials have demonstrated a strong antimetastatic effect, and clinical data have demonstrated its safety in NSCLC, breast cancer, advanced melanoma, and a significant clinical benefit in NSCLC patients compared to best supportive care [62] [63] [64] [65] .

Immunogenicity of tumour antigens and high mutational load are essential for response to immunotherapy. Glioblastoma, for instance, has low mutational load: hence, the limited intratumoral immune cell infiltration [66] . A number of different vaccine approaches including peptide vaccines and cell-based vaccines (DC and tumour-cell vaccines) have been trialed for treatment of glioblastoma, however, results of these studies have not been satisfactory to be considered for treatment [67] [68] [69] . In a phase I trial, glioma actively personalized vaccine (GAPVAC) using peptide antigens with polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid-poly-L-lysine carboxymethylcellulose (poly-ICLC) and GM-CSF adjuvants showed feasibility and a favourable safety with strong immunogenicity in newly diagnosed glioblastoma [70] . In this trial, patients were treated with a vaccine derived from unmutated premanufactured antigens (APVAC1) followed by a vaccine targeting mutated neoepitopes (APVAC2). APVAC1 induced a sustained response of memory CD8 + T cells, while APVAC2 mainly induced CD4 + T helper 1 type responses against predicted neoepitopes [70] .

In many of the trials noted above [56, 64, 69, 70] , cancer vaccines are tried in conjunction with approved immunotherapies or other standard of care therapies. While vaccines can induce activation of anti-cancer immune effector functions, the activated immune cells must contend with the highly immunosuppressive microenvironment encountered within some tumors. The immunosuppressive mechanisms within tumor include, barriers to immune infiltration by anti-cancer immune cells, selective recruitment of cells with immunosuppressive activity, induction of T cell death, production of enzymes and metabolites that are immunosuppressive, and hypoxia conditions in tumors, all of which can hamper anti-cancer immune responses induced by vaccines [10] . Disruption of immune suppression in tumors through the use immunotherapies in combination with vaccines is, therefore, expected to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Alternatively, induction of anti-cancer immune responses by vaccines may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents.

One of the challenges in developing cancer vaccines has been the nature of the antigens in tumours. An ideal tumour antigen for cancer vaccines would have high expression levels specifically in tumour cells, and broad expression pattern in multiple cancers. Based on their expression profiles, tumour antigens can be of two types: (i) tumour-associated antigens (TAA), and (ii) tumour-specific antigens (TSA) [71] . TAAs are self-antigens that may be expressed in normal tissues but overexpressed in multiple types of cancers (e.g., survivin), expressed in specific tissues and cancers of those tissues (e.g., Melan-A in melanoma and melanocytes), or mainly expressed in cancer tissues and their genes are silenced in normal adult tissues (e.g., cancer-testis antigens) [72] [73] [74] . TAA that are highly expressed in several types of tumours but have zero or at least low expression in healthy and mature somatic cells, have the potential to be targeted for cancer vaccines and immunotherapy. A major disadvantage of using TAAs for cancer immunotherapy is that TAAs are self-proteins, and therefore, inducing an immune response against them means breaking self-tolerance against self-antigens, which carries the risk of inducing autoimmunity. TSAs, on the other hand, are mutated self-antigens, also known as neoantigens, which are specific to each tumour, and are expressed on tumour cells only. Neve-rthe-less, there still remains the possible of cross-reactivity with the native antigen, resulting in autoimmune responses against self-antigens. As well, antigen loss may occur in tumours, rendering antigen-specific immune responses against the lost antigen ineffective. Additionally, not all neoantigens are immunogenic, making their identification, screening for immunogencity, and use in the development of personalized cancer vaccines expensive and arduous (Fig. 2) [75] .

The discovery of neoantigens have opened new avenues for antigen screening and selection for cancer immunotherapy and vaccines. Gene mutations that occur during carcinogenesis take place in the coding and non-coding regions of the tumour cell's genome. When a mutation occurs in the coding region of a gene, it results in a change in the amino acid sequence of the protein it codes for, and the expression of a neoantigen in the tumour cell [76] . Neoantigens are highly specific to each individual and are different from the traditional TAA [77] . Because neoantigens are expressed only on tumour cells but not normal cells, they are recognized as non-self antigens by the immune system. Tumour neoantigens are broadly categorized into two types: (i) shared neoantigens, and (ii) personalized neoantigens. Shared neoantigens are similar in different cancer patients; thus, it can be used in a wide-spectrum therapeutic approach for patients with the same mutated gene [78] . On the other hand, personalized neoantigens are unique and differ from patient to patient, therefore, the application of neoantigens in this case should be targeted to each individual (i.e. personalized therapy) [79] .

All mutations that occur in tumours: point mutations, inversion, fusion, reading-frame alterations, and insertiondeletions, can generate neoantigens [80] [81] [82] . However, not all neoantigens are immunogenic and certain conditions must be met for a neoantigen to induce anti-tumour immunity. These conditions include sufficient expression of the specific neoantigen, high affinity of binding to the patient HLA molecules, and efficient recognition by the patient's T cells [81] . Indeed, neoantigens with a strong affinity towards HLA molecules, as well as CD4 + andCD8 + T cells specific to these neoantigens have been detected in cancer patients [83] [84] [85] .

The first step in neoantigen screening is the comparison of genomic DNA sequences from the normal cells and tumour cells (Fig. 2) . This step is complex as some of the tumour's mutations occur in the non-coding region of the genome and not all mutations are non-synonymous, that is they do not change the amino acid sequences of the protein. Moreover, the identification of mutant proteins that can elicit an anti-tumour immune response can be a challenging process [86] . Current development of bioinformatics tools and algorithms have increased the reliability and accuracy of neoantigen prediction and identification [87] . Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become one of the most versatile techniques that scientists have relied on for neoantigen discovery. Additionally, mass spectrometry (MS) has been used to predict post-translational modifications of neoantigens [88, 89] . In addition to the tumour genome sequencing data, information about the patient's HLA haplotype, affinity of the mutated peptides towards the patient's HLA, peptide-HLA complex stability, the affinity between peptide-HLA complex and T cell receptor, and T cell responses against the mutated peptides are needed to ascertain the immunogenicity of neoantigens and the specificity of anti-tumour immune responses [90] [91] [92] . It is estimated that only 10% of non-synonymous mutations in tumour cells can generate peptides with high affinity to the patient HLA molecules, and only 1-2% of peptide-HLA complex can stimulate CD8 + T cells [93] .

Despite the challenges of neoantigen screening and identification, several studies have demonstrated the potential for the use of neoantigens in eliciting anti-tumour immune responses. Castle et al. was the first to use synthetic long peptide (SLP)-based vaccine using neoantigens in mouse melanoma models. From over 50 mutations identified, two mutated antigens showed significant therapeutic effects in these mouse models [87] . In 2015, Carreno et al. reported, for the first time, a personalized DC-based vaccine to treat patients with melanoma. In this study, neoantigens were identified using an immunohistochemistry approach and then patient's DCs loaded with the neoantigens were transfused into patient, which resulted in enhanced anti-tumour T cell responses [94] . Similarly, Sahin et al. reported the use of RNA-based personalized vaccine using neoantigens identified in a trial that included 13 melanoma patients. Eight of these patients had no further tumour development over the following 23 months [95] .

Several obstacles remain in the development and widespread use of neoantigen-based personalized cancer vaccines. The long cycle of cancer genome sequencing, neoantigen identification, and verification of immunogenicity add to the high cost of personalized vaccines, making them economically unfeasible for widespread use in cancer patients [79] . Development of improved bioinformatics tools for characterization of neoantigens, a more in depth understanding of tumour immunology, and advances in vaccine development and delivery methods will prove critical for the development and use of novel neoantigen-based cancer vaccines.

The fundamental goal of all vaccines is to prevent diseases, and their possible devastating consequences [96] . Any specific vaccine works by eliciting an immune response against an antigen that is found in the target pathogen [97] . Once primed by vaccination, the immune system will produce antibodies, cytotoxic cells, and memory cells that can neutralize and destroy the target pathogen before it causes a serious disease [96, 97] . There are many current and emerging types of vaccines that use either protein-based or gene-based approaches [98] .

Two exciting examples of vaccine technologies that are currently in research are the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-and ribonucleic acid (RNA)-based vaccines, which are referred to as genetic vaccines, or most commonly, nucleic acid vaccines [99, 100] . Currently, there are no DNA vaccines approved for human use, and the first RNA-based vaccines were rapidly developed in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic [101, 102] . RNA-based vaccines use a type of RNA called messenger RNA (mRNA), which carries the genetic information for a protein antigen [98, 103] . mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 have been approved by Health Canada, granted emergency use authorization by the FDA, and granted emergency use validation by the WHO. Unlike traditional vaccines that use a live attenuated or inactivated pathogen, or parts of the pathogen (subunit vaccines) as the source of the antigen, the nucleic acid vaccines use the genetic code for protein antigens derived from a pathogen to elicit an immune response [104] . Nucleic acid vaccines do not contain weakened or killed versions of the pathogen, or parts of the pathogen as the source of the antigen [102] . Instead, they make use of the cellular processes for protein synthesis to produce a protein, or a peptide, that triggers an immune response against a pathogen in what's called a gene-based approach [98, 101, 105] .

A key challenge in nucleic acid vaccines is shielding them from being degraded before reaching the target site. To avoid degradation of DNA vaccines by DNases and other nucleases, nano-carriers are often used [101] . There are many types of nano-carriers that are being studied, such as: nano-carriers composed of inorganic material, lipid-based nano-carriers, protein-based nano-carriers, and polymeric nano-carriers [101] . mRNA vaccines have been found to be most effective when the mRNA is bound to lipofection formulation [98] . A critical part of mRNA vaccines is successfully transporting the mRNA into the cells [106] . Utilizing lipid nanoparticles (LNP) is the most common method of mRNA vaccine delivery. Liposome-based transfection reagents containing cationic lipids are used to protect the mRNA from degradation by RNases as it makes its way into the cell through the extracellular space [98, 106] . LNPs are designed with an aqueous core, where the mRNA resides, which is enclosed by a lipid bilayer shell [106] . The recent development of ionizable lipids and lipid-like materials has increased the potency of LNPs [106] . Phospholipids, cholesterol, and lipid-anchored polyethylene glycol are also commonly used for both structural and functional purposes in LNPs [106] . Another exciting prospect of LNPs is the potential to embed lipophilic compounds into the lipid bilayer, including adjuvants to increase efficacy of the mRNA vaccine [106] . In addition to LNPs, extracellular exomes, which are key mediators of intercellular communication, are also extensively studied as a method for cancer vaccine delivery. Their optimal size, biocompatibility, stability and target specific delivery makes exomes attractive nano-carriers for vaccines [107] .

There are several different routes of administration for DNA vaccines, including injection (Intravenous or Intramuscular), oral, topical, and pulmonary routes [101] . The most common method of delivery for mRNA vaccines is intramuscular injection [106] . This is the route of administration used in all the seven mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 that contain lipid nanoparticles [98] . Intramuscular injections are simple to perform, requiring little personnel training, and mRNA molecules are delivered to the muscle cells for protein synthesis [106] . Other modes of mRNA vaccine delivery that have been investigated include subcutaneous, intradermal, intravenous, intranasal, intranodal, and intraperitoneal methods [106] .

Discover Oncology (2022) 13:31 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00491-4 1 3

To understand how nucleic acid vaccines work, it is crucial to understand the normal protein synthesis process at the cellular level. Proteins are essential for many cellular functions in our body. Synthesis of proteins using the genetic code in DNA occurs through 2 stages: transcription, and translation [108] . In transcription, the nucleotide sequences in DNA are copied into a complimentary sequence in an mRNA molecule. Transcription occurs in the nucleus where the DNA is stored. The mRNA molecules are then transported into the cytoplasm where translation occurs. During translation, the nucleotide sequence in the mRNA, specifying an amino acid sequence, is read by ribosomes, which are organelles in the cytoplasm. Ribosomes move along the mRNA strand and use the genetic code of the mRNA sequence to translate the codons into their corresponding amino acids, which are then assembled to form a polypeptide and further processed to form mature proteins. Nucleic acid vaccines use the cellular process of protein synthesis to produce antigenic peptides in the cells that will trigger an antigen-specific immune response. Following a route of injection, nucleic acid molecules (DNA or RNA) must enter keratinocytes and myocytes, as well as antigen-presenting cells (APC) near the injection site, in a process called transfection [101, 109] . DNA vaccines supply the DNA molecule, which contains the genetic code for a protein antigen, to our cells [110] . The DNA in the vaccine is in the form of a circular plasmid, which is derived from bacterial cells [110] . This DNA enters our cells and translocates to the nucleus, where it undergoes transcription to form a mRNA molecule [101] . The mRNA molecules are then translocated back to the cytoplasm, where the genetic code is read by ribosomes to synthesize a protein. mRNA vaccines work through the same cellular processes, however, instead of a DNA molecule it directly provides a pre-synthesized mRNA for translation into an antigenic protein (Fig. 3) [104]. Cellular transfection of myocytes and APCs by the LNP-encapsulated mRNA occur through endocytosis [98] . When the lipid nanoparticle enters the cytoplasm of the cell, they are degraded to release the mRNA in the cytoplasm, where they are translated into proteins by ribosomes [105] . The antigenic proteins are process by the antigen processing and presentation machinery Fig. 3 mRNA vaccine. mRNA vaccines work by inducing cells to produce antigens. Once inside the cells, mRNA is translated into proteins, which are processed into antigenic peptides presented on MHC molecules. Antigen presenting cells can also take up proteins released by dying cells to process and present them on MHC molecules. B cells and T cells that can recognize antigenic peptides and peptide:MHC complexes, respectively, are activated to initiate an adaptive immune response in the cells to generate antigenic peptides, which can be recognized as foreign antigens by B cells directly and by T cells when they are presented on MHC molecules. APCs also take up proteins released from dying myocytes, which are then processed and presented on MHC molecules to activate T cells.

The benefit of mRNA vaccines lies in the possibilities that they hold for the future of safe and effective vaccination. Live-attenuated vaccines are the most potent type of vaccine in terms of activating both humoral and cellular immune responses [106] . Subunit vaccines are successfully used to generate humoral immunity against pathogens, but they do not generate cellular immunity, and often require the use of adjuvants to boost immunogenicity of the antigens [106] . Generating cellular immunity is critical to destroying the intercellular pathogen reservoir in some chronic diseases [106] . A significant drawbackof live-attenuated vaccines is their rare but concerning potential to cause disease in immunosuppressed individuals [106] . Therefore, it is usually recommended that immunosuppressed patients do not receive live-attenuated vaccines [106] . mRNA and DNA vaccines have been developed with the hope of solving both safety and efficacy issues [106] . Nucleic acid vaccines have been proven to induce both cellular and humoral immunity (like liveattenuated vaccines), while also being safe (like subunit vaccines) since they do not contain whole or parts of the pathogen [106, 111] . Another advantage of nucleic acid vaccines, when compared to traditional vaccines, like live-attenuated vaccines and inactivated vaccines, is their ability to be manufactured rapidly [98] . The manufacturing process of the more traditional vaccines have safety concerns and carry a high risk of contamination with live pathogens [99] . The simple and safe manufacturing processes for nucleic acid vaccines are key reasons that they have been extensively researched [99] .

Nevertheless, there are still safety concerns with nucleic acid vaccines that must not be overlooked, particularly with DNA vaccines. Since, DNA resides in the nucleus of cells, the DNA molecules in the vaccine must be transported to the nucleus of the cells [102, 106] . To facilitate transport of DNA into the nucleus, viral vectors, such as adenoviruses, are used as vehicles for DNA delivery [112] . However, the use of such delivery vectors could have potential safety concerns collectively referred to as vector-mediated genotoxicity [112, 113] . mRNA vaccines do not have to cross the nuclear membrane and are translated in the cytoplasm. Hence, they do not have similar safety concern as DNA vaccines [106] . In addition, mRNA molecules stay in the cytoplasm of the cell for a relatively short period of time before it is degraded [106] .

The idea of using nucleic acid vaccines for the treatment of cancer, using both DNA-and RNA-based approaches, is a radical departure from the more traditional methods of cancer treatment, and represents a new era in cancer therapy. Generally, the goal of most vaccines is to prevent someone from either contracting a pathogen, or become seriously ill from the disease it causes, hence are called prophylactic vaccines [114] . Most cancer vaccines being researched are therapeutic in nature, i.e., they are used to treat the patient after they have developed a disease [99] . This is a key difference between the goals of nucleic acid vaccines for pathogens and nucleic acid vaccines for cancers. Therapeutic nucleic acid vaccines for the treatment of cancers rely on similar principles as the preventative vaccines, i.e., to teach the immune system to identify tumours and destroy them [99] . This is done by targeting antigens that are commonly expressed on cancer cells [115] . These antigens include growth associated factors, or antigens that are unique to cancer cells due to somatic mutations (neoantigens) [115] . Both mRNA and DNA vaccines work by delivering the genetic information to cells necessary to produce tumour antigens, and then induce immune responses against these antigens [99] . These antigenspecific immune responses, in particular the cytotoxic T cells, have the potential to clear tumour cells from the body, and therefore aid in cancer treatment (Fig. 3) [115, 116] . In a recent study, whether anti-tumour responses mediated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in solid tumour could be enhanced through immunizing patients against tumour antigens using mRNA vaccines was studied [117] . In the Phase I of the trials sponsored by ModernaTX Inc., mRNA-4157 was used as monotherapy in patients with resected solid tumours and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable solid tumors. This combination was found to be safe and it induced neoantigen specific T cell responses in the immunized patients [117] . Currently, phase II trial is in progress (NCT03 739931).

Discover Oncology (2022) 13:31 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00491-4 1 3

COVID-19 is the disease caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2 [98, 118] . SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped virus with a positivesense single-stranded RNA genome, belonging to the β-coronavirus subfamily [98] . An important part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is it's 'spike (S) protein, which is a relatively large surface glycoprotein containing 1300 amino acids [98, 105] . It is encoded by the virus' 3,822-bp S gene [98] . The role of the S protein is to interact with the host cells by binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), allowing the virus to fuse with the cell membrane and enter cells [119, 120] . COVID-19 has a profound impact on certain organs, such as the lungs, heart, and kidneys, likely due to high expression of ACE2 on epithelial cells in these organs [121] .

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many vaccines were developed. Safe and effective vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are viewed as essential to conquering the COVID-19 pandemic, which has had an exceptionally negative impact on physical and mental health. Currently, there are over 100 vaccine candidates for SARS-CoV-2 being studied around the world according to the WHO. The leaders in the race to develop a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 emerged as two mRNA vaccines, made by Pfizer and BioNTech, and by Moderna. These vaccines were both developed in under a year, which is considered incredible, since the fastest prior vaccine brought to the market was made in approximately 4 years. Along with the two mRNA vaccines, some of the other fastest developed vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 use viral vector technology, such as those developed by AstraZeneca [122] .

Conventional vaccines usually take years or decades to manufacture and test, and ultimately obtain approval for human use [105] . Typically, they are very expensive to produce [105] . This makes them ill-suited to combat global pandemic from novel viruses, like SARS-CoV-2. mRNA vaccines however have the advantage of relatively low cost and rapid manufacturing.

To accelerate the process of approval, there were numerous strategies employed. In the United States, the FDA granted three vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). According to the FDA, an EUA is granted when the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks of the vaccine [123] . Granting an EUA to these vaccines allows them to be rolled out much faster than having to wait for a full FDA approval, which takes longer to achieve. As of August 23, 2021, the FDA has given full approval to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine [123] .

A critical problem in the effort to vaccinate the world against COVID-19 comes from widespread vaccine hesitancy and/or skepticism. As of early August 2021, the US COVID-19 vaccine rollout has slowed to concerning levels, with a substantial portion of the population refusing to be vaccinated against COVID-19. This is often attributed to a rise in misinformation due to the development of social media platforms with several conspiracy theories, specifically regarding the mRNA technology. Some of the conspiracy theories include belief of impaired fertility following vaccination, fear of mRNA integrating itself into the human genome and altering our DNA, and several others related to religious and political views. While none of these conspiracy theories are merit based, they persist and circulate in populations around the world, including the United States and Canada where vaccines are widely accessible [124] .

Another challenge for some mRNA vaccines is the requirement for storage and transport at ultra-low temperatures [98] . One possible avenue for combatting this challenge of mRNA vaccines is developing new types of lipid nanoparticle technologies that are more stable at ambient temperature [98] . These lessons learnt and experiences gained from developing mRNA vaccines and immunizing nations against COVID-19 are going to be valuable in developing mRNA vaccines against cancer [125] .

Cancer Immunotherapy properly named as the "Breakthrough of the year in 2013" has revolutionized the treatment of several types of cancer. The tremendous experience with nucleic acid vaccines in the COVID-19 era, will move the file of cancer vaccine forward. A time may come when cancer vaccines will be part of the immunization history, and oncologists share the joy of a pediatrician knowing that immunized patients are protected not only against infectious pathogens but against specific types of cancers [125] . 

Innate Immunity-Immune Disorders-Merck Manuals Consumer Version

Acquired Immunity-Immune Disorders-Merck Manuals Consumer Version

Innate immune sensing by cells of the adaptive immune system

Dendritic cells and the control of immunity

High-throughput epitope discovery reveals frequent recognition of neo-antigens by CD4+ T cells in human melanoma

Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome

Spectrum of cancer risk among U.S. solid organ transplant recipients: the transplant cancer match study

Development of cancer in patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape

Mechanisms of immune evasion by tumors

The classic: the treatment of malignant tumors by repeated I

Bicentennial: the birth of chemotherapy at yale: bicentennial lecture series: surgery grand round

Cancer immunotherapy: harnessing the immune system to battle cancer

Paul Ehrlich (1854-1915) and His contributions to the foundation and birth of translational medicine

Interleukin-2: is it still indicated for melanoma and rcc in an era of targeted therapies?-ProQuest

Development of ipilimumab: a novel immunotherapeutic approach for the treatment of advanced melanoma

Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma

Immune-mediated adverse events associated with ipilimumab ctla-4 blockade therapy: the underlying mechanisms and clinical management

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy of human cancer: past, present, and future

Opdivo (nivolumab) FDA Approval History-Drugs.com

Keytruda (pembrolizumab) FDA Approval History-Drugs.com

A brief history of CAR-T cells: from laboratory to the bedside

A novel immunotherapy-the history of CAR T-cell therapy

The major etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma

Universal hepatitis B vaccination in Taiwan and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in children. Taiwan Childhood Hepatoma Study Group

Decreased incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B vaccinees: a 20-year follow-up study

Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in children in Khon Kaen before and after National Hepatitis B Vaccine Pogram

Elimination of hepatocellular carcinoma and acute hepatitis B in children 25 years after a hepatitis B newborn and catch-up immunization program

Human papillomavirus vaccines. WHO position paper

A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines

Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine on All HPV-associated genital diseases in young women

Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine (gardasil(®)): a review of its use in the prevention of premalignant anogenital lesions, cervical and anal cancers, and genital warts

Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on HPV 16/18-related prevalence in precancerous cervical lesions

Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases

Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 viruslike particle vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: a randomized trial

Impact of a population-based HPV vaccination program on cervical abnormalities: a data linkage study

T cell-dependent antibody responses against aberrantly expressed cyclin B1 protein in patients with cancer and premalignant disease

Autoantibodies to aberrantly glycosylated MUC1 in early stage breast cancer are associated with a better prognosis

Protective effect of naturally occurring anti-HER2 autoantibodies on breast cancer

Sipuleucel-T (Provenge) injection: the first immunotherapy agent (vaccine) for hormone-refractory prostate cancer

EAU Guidelines: Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer|Uroweb

History of BCG Vaccine

Intracavitary Bacillus Calmette-Guerin in the treatment of superficial bladder tumors

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy of superficial bladder cancer

Clinical spectrum of complications induced by intravesical immunotherapy of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for bladder cancer

Placebo-controlled phase III trial of immunologic therapy with sipuleucel-T (APC8015) in patients with metastatic, asymptomatic hormone refractory prostate cancer

Immunotherapy (APC8015, provenge®) targeting prostatic acid phosphatase can induce durable remission of metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer: A phase 2 trial

Priming tissue-specific cellular immunity in a phase I trial of autologous dendritic cells for prostate cancer

Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer

Integrated data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T in advanced prostate cancer

GM-CSF gene-modifed cancer cell immunotherapies: of mice and men

Gemogenovatucel-T (Vigil) immunotherapy as maintenance in frontline stage III/IV ovarian cancer (VITAL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial

Evaluation of ipilimumab in combination with allogeneic pancreatic tumor cells transfected with a GM-CSF gene in previously treated pancreatic cancer

Allogeneic granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor-secreting tumor immunotherapy alone or in sequence with cyclophosphamide for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a pilot study of safety, feasibility, and immune activation

High-dose granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-producing vaccines impair the immune response through the recruitment of myeloid suppressor cells

A lethally irradiated allogeneic granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor-secreting tumor vaccine for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A phase II trial of safety, efficacy, and immune activation

A safety and feasibility study of an allogeneic colon cancer cell vaccine administered with a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor-producing bystander cell line in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Racotumomab for treating lung cancer and pediatric refractory malignancies

Immune responses in breast cancer patients immunized with an anti-idiotype antibody mimicking NeuGc-containing gangliosides

Cellular and humoral immune response to N-Glycolyl-GM3 elicited by prolonged immunotherapy with an anti-idiotypic vaccine in high-risk and metastatic breast cancer patients

Metronomic cyclophosphamide and methotrexate chemotherapy combined with 1E10 anti-idiotype vaccine in metastatic breast cancer

1E10 anti-idiotype vaccine in non-small cell lung cancer: Experience in stage IIIb/IV patients

The microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors

Molecular subgroups and B7-H4 expression levels predict responses to dendritic cell vaccines in glioblastoma: an exploratory randomized phase II clinical trial

Clinical trial of autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine for glioblastoma multiforme patients

Phase I/IIa trial of fractionated radiotherapy, temozolomide, and autologous formalin-fixed tumor vaccine for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Clinical article

Actively personalized vaccination trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Translating tumor antigens into cancer vaccines

Sequence and expression pattern of the human MAGE2 gene

Melanocyte lineage-specific antigen gp100 is recognized by melanoma-derived tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Survivin is a shared tumor-associated antigen expressed in a broad variety of malignancies and recognized by specific cytotoxic T cells

An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma

Mobile interspersed repeats are major structural variants in the human genome

Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma

Epitope landscape in breast and colorectal cancer

An Immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for melanoma patients

Targeting of cancer neoantigens with donor-derived T cell receptor repertoires

Peptide-MHC class I stability is a better predictor than peptide affinity of CTL immunogenicity

Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer

High-throughput epitope discovery reveals frequent recognition of neo-antigens by CD4+ T cells in human melanoma

Systematic identification of personal tumor-specific neoantigens in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

The critical role of CD4+ T cells in PD-1 blockade against MHC-II-expressing tumors such as classic Hodgkin lymphoma

CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells control the induction of antigen-specific CD4+ helper T cell responses in cancer patients

Exploiting the mutanome for tumor vaccination

Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition

Direct identification of clinically relevant neoepitopes presented on native human melanoma tissue by mass spectrometry

Neopepsee: accurate genome-level prediction of neoantigens by harnessing sequence and amino acid immunogenicity information

Predicting T cell recognition of MHC class I restricted neoepitopes

A vaccine targeting mutant IDH1 induces antitumour immunity

Molecular and genetic properties of tumors associated with local immune cytolytic activity

Cancer immunotherapy. A dendritic cell vaccine increases the breadth and diversity of melanoma neoantigen-specific T cells

Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer

Vaccines: Basics and Common Questions | CDC

MODULE 1 -How vaccines work -WHO Vaccine Safety Basics

mRNA vaccines for COVID-19: what, why and how

Comparison of DNA and mRNA vaccines against cancer

DNA and RNA-based vaccines: principles, progress and prospects

DNA vaccines-how far from clinical use?

Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC

RNA|Definition, structure, types, & functions|Britannica

What's the Difference Between a DNA and RNA Vaccine?

mRNA vaccines for COVID-19: a simple explanation

mRNA vaccine delivery using lipid nanoparticles

Exosome-based vaccines: history, current state, and clinical trials. Front Immunol

What are proteins and what do they do

DNA vaccines: ready for prime time?

DNA-based vaccination induces humoral and cellular immune responses against hepatitis B virus surface antigen in mice without activation of C-myc

How does gene therapy work?

Viral vectors: the road to reducing genotoxicity

prophylactic immunization | medicine | Britannica

mRNA vaccines-a new era in vaccinology

Cytotoxic T cells

A phase 1, open-label, multicenter study to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of mRNA-4157 alone in subjects with resected solid tumors and in combination with pembrolizumab in subjects with unresectable solid tumors (Keynote-603)

A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor

Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2

The protein expression profile of ACE2 in human tissues

Covid-19 Vaccine Tracker: Latest Updates-The New York Times

Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines Explained|FDA

Politics the reason Canada has surpassed U.S. on COVID vaccines, Fauci says | CBC News

Breakthrough of the year 2013

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations