key: cord-1041862-02v3qbl4 authors: Nazir, Hassan; Muthuswamy, Navaneethan; Louis, Cindrella; Jose, Sujin; Prakash, Jyoti; Buan, Marthe E.M.; Flox, Cristina; Chavan, Sai; Shi, Xuan; Kauranen, Pertti; Kallio, Tanja; Maia, Gilberto; Tammeveski, Kaido; Lymperopoulos, Nikolaos; Carcadea, Elena; Veziroglu, Emre; Iranzo, Alfredo; M. Kannan, Arunachala title: Is the H(2) economy realizable in the foreseeable future? Part III: H(2) usage technologies, applications, and challenges and opportunities date: 2020-08-21 journal: Int J Hydrogen Energy DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.256 sha: 14cdef871bbb8b3d15b5a8919945fa7012dac366 doc_id: 1041862 cord_uid: 02v3qbl4 Energy enthusiasts in developed countries explore sustainable and efficient pathways for accomplishing zero carbon footprint through the H(2) economy. The major objective of the H(2) economy review series is to bring out the status, major issues, and opportunities associated with the key components such as H(2) production, storage, transportation, distribution, and applications in various energy sectors. Specifically, Part I discussed H(2) production methods including the futuristic ones such as photoelectrochemical for small, medium, and large-scale applications, while Part II dealt with the challenges and developments in H(2) storage, transportation, and distribution with national and international initiatives. Part III of the H(2) economy review discusses the developments and challenges in the areas of H(2) application in chemical/metallurgical industries, combustion, and fuel cells. Currently, the majority of H(2) is being utilized by a few chemical industries with >60% in the oil refineries sector, by producing grey H(2) by steam methane reforming on a large scale. In addition, the review also presents the challenges in various technologies for establishing greener and sustainable H(2) society. All major sectors in the hydrocarbon economy can progress towards decarbonization with a deployment of H 2 technologies. H 2 economy can be attained through the large-scale integration of renewable energies and intermittent power generation with the production of green H 2 as described in Part I of this review series [1] . Once the cleaner H 2 production technologies mature in the near future with commercial viability ($1.5 to 3 per kg H 2 ), most likely through water electrolysis and/or steam methane reforming (SMR) with carbon capture and storage (CCS), a significant deployment into mass markets is very likely to occur [2] . H 2 also enables the distribution of energy not only to end-users such as refueling stations but also to various industrial sectors by road, pipelines, and ocean in solid, compressed, or liquid forms, as detailed in Part II of the review series [3] . The role of stored H 2 at large scale (underground or in the gas grids blended with natural gas) to increase the energy system resilience is expected to evolve together with the penetration of renewable energies in the power generation mix. The major goal of Part III of the H 2 economy series is to review how H 2 will contribute to achieve the zero-carbon footprint of sectors such as transportation (light and heavy-duty on-road, rail, and ship), industry, and buildings (heat and power), as well as its use as feedstock in industries such as chemicals, refineries, or steel. Fuel cell stacks are matured enough for commercialization and durability has been generally proved such as in London's buses with over 25,000 h operation. Thus, the most significant challenge for a massive deployment is to reduce stack and system costs, which will require both economies of scale (increased productions) and further technology developments to reduce material costs, typically the load of catalyst precious metals. The use of fuel cell stacks in heavy-duty applications is promising a vast market in the next decade, not only in road transport but also in trains (such as the recent Alstom iLint FCH train with 400 kW FC) and ships. Moreover, green H 2 from large-scale renewable electrolysis and SMR/CCS will play an essential role to decarbonize industry, replacing the grey H 2 currently used in the refining and ammonia production industry. Clean H 2 is also expected to replace fossil feedstock such as coke in steel manufacturing, and to progressively replace natural gas for heat and power generation. The scope of Part III of the review series is shown in Fig. 1 , where the realization of H 2 economy in a sustainable manner in the foreseeable future for various applications is presented. As seen on the left-hand side of Fig. 1 , H 2 can be effectively utilized for applications comprising industrial processes as a hydrogenating agent, fuel cells (FC) as a direct anode fuel as well as in the combustion process as a feedstock. Major H 2 consumers are the industrial processes related to ammonia production and oil refineries where H 2 is produced by steam methane reforming in large-scale. As the cleanest energy conversion devices, low-temperature FCs use relatively pure H 2 as fuel, being utilized for transportation and stationary applications. With its high gravimetric energy content, H 2 is also being considered as a cleaner fuel for gas turbines, internal combustion engines, and as a direct fuel for thermal energy applications. As shown in Fig. 1 (right-hand side) , the review also brings out the major issues associated with largescale H 2 production and distribution along with market potentials and opportunities for commercialization with the aim of developing a sustainable and secure H 2 society [4, 5] . Industrial uses of H 2 H 2 is widely used in industry, with consumption of~70 million tons per year in 2019 in pure form (about 6% of the natural gas use) and another 45 million tons as syngas, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA) [6] , as shown in Fig. 2(aed) . It is, therefore, an established industrial gas being part of the global industrial business. The production market of H 2 for industrial uses was valued at $115 billion in 2017 and is expected to grow to $155 billion in 2022 [7, 8] . The H 2 production market is typically divided into "merchant" H 2 for delivery to customers (central generation of H 2 to be sold/distributed by tanks, trucks or pipeline), and "captive" H 2 (on-site H 2 generation at a given facility to be consumed for internal uses). Focusing on the chemical and process industry [9] , H 2 is a fundamental reactant in the refining industry and for ammonia production, and therefore fertilizers. Over 27% of the H 2 produced globally is used for ammonia synthesis, refineries use~33%, methanol producers use~10%, and over 6% are used by other industries [6] . It is worth mentioning that other chemical industries such as chlor-alkali are producing large quantities of H 2 as a by-product, and the potential for integrating a FC based power generation plant to reduce the industry's electrical consumption has been proven to be a reality [5,10e12] . Ammonia is industrially produced by combining H 2 and N 2 by the reaction of N 2 þ 3H 2 ! 2NH 3 , with the rate-determining step of dissociative chemisorption of N 2 on the iron catalyst surface (Fe 2 N and g-Fe 4 N), through the Haber-Bosch process. In general, both reactants are produced on-site: N 2 by lowtemperature separation of air, and H 2 mainly from natural gas steam reforming (thus "captive" H 2 ). The industrial process conditions are 250e350 bar and 450e550 C with a-Fe (ferrite) as a catalyst. Overall, 90% of the ammonia production is used for the fertilizer industry, although it is also used as a refrigerant in refrigeration plants (R-717). In the early 20th century, large hydropower driven alkaline electrolyzers were used to produce H 2 for ammonia synthesis. For example, a 165 MW electrolyzer with 37,000 m 3 H 2 /h was operated at Aswan in Egypt [13] . Oil refineries are the largest consumer of H 2 , which is produced on-site mainly from natural gas reforming as "captive" H 2 , with over 33% share of the global H 2 production [6] . H 2 is used for the processing of intermediate oil products by hydrogenation reactions usually using nickel, palladium or platinum catalysts, as well as for the processing of crude oil into refined fuels (diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel) by hydrocracking and hydro-desulfurization [14, 15] . Hydrocracking takes place at 70e150 bar and 400e800 C depending on the nature of the feedstock. Strict regulations requiring low sulfur in diesel together with the increase in the feedstock containing lower-quality heavy crude oil has increased the H 2 use in refineries. Recent efforts are being carried out to introduce clean H 2 generation into refineries. The FCH-JU has funded the REFHYNE project to supply clean refinery H 2 , operating the world's largest H 2 electrolyzer (10 MW, producing 1300-t of H 2 / year) in the Shell Rhineland Refinery in Wesseling, Germany and design studies are underway to scale up to 100 MW level [16] . The production of methanol, mainly by the catalytic hydrogenation of carbon monoxide (CO þ 2H 2 / CH 3 OH; DH ¼ À90.7 (kJ/mole)), accounts for 10% of the global H 2 use. The industrial process conditions are 50e100 bar and 250 C. Renewable methanol as a liquid fuel has been proposed as another carbon-neutral energy vector in parallel to H 2 [17] . Other industrial-scale methanol production methods (synthesis, gasification, reforming), can be used to cover the rising demand of this fuel. Methanol can be used in transportation i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y x x x ( x x x x ) x x x applications, directly in internal combustion engines or by blending with gasoline and diesel to reduce emissions. It must be mentioned that methanol has proved its applicability in transportation being used directly as a fuel in methanol fuel cells (DMFC) or after on-board reforming in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Also, methanol is a raw material used to synthesize formaldehyde (CH 2 O), acetic acid (CH 3 COOH), dimethyl ether (DME, CH 3 OCH 3 ), and other chemicals. Several projects have tried to find the best production method for methanol or to demonstrate its suitability for various applications. Obtaining green methanol is a subject of many projects, such as Power2Me [18, 19] , MefCO 2 [20] , and Djewels projects [21] . The last-mentioned project started in January 2020 with the main goal to demonstrate the operational readiness of a 20 MW electrolyzer for the production of green fuels (green methanol). It will bring the technology close to the commercial stage (TRL 8) and will be the basis for scaling up the system to 100 MW. Several applications are expected at the end of the projects that deal with methanol usage, i.e. a small scale H 2 generator (NEMESIS2 project) [22] , an auxiliary power unit (METAPU project) [23] or light transport vehicles [24, 25] . DME and other renewable fuels to H 2 supplement DME can be synthesized from syngas In addition to being a cleaner and efficient fuel in diesel engines, DME also has multiple uses as refrigerant, a propellant for spray cans, household fuel, solvent, and methylation agent in the chemical industry. In the past 15 years, there has been a huge demand for DME, from 150 kT/ year worldwide to more than 2000 kT/year only in China [26] . When DME is obtained from methanol, it can be used successfully in diesel engines for trucks and heavy-duty applications due to water removal. In the BioDME project [27, 28] , Volvo used DME fuel in diesel trucks for driving more than 1,500,000 km, so the project has been considered a success story. DME can be used in stationary applications, and has been used as household fuel (stove, heating) in China since 2004 [29] . A 20% blend in liquefied petroleum gas or natural gas can be used without any modification of the appliances. H 2 reduction/hydrogenation H 2 treatment or hydrogenation is a well-established process in the food industry and organic chemistry. Moreover, H 2 is used in the tungsten and molybdenum refining process in order to avoid carbide formation during the reduction process. The reduction of iron ore offers a huge potential for green H 2 to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in steel production. SSAB, a Swedish steel producer, and Vattenfall, a leading European energy company, jointly planned to demonstrate the world's first fossil-free steelmaking technology by 2025 [30]. H 2 is also postulated as a solution to ensure electricity towards the future low carbon system since it is employed as a reagent in the FC technologies [31] . FC technologies are a critical and indispensable element, enabling secure and suitable energy transition in a cost-effective and environmental way [32, 33] . Any emissions are related to the way H 2 is produced. Comparing with other technologies, the FC has higher electrical efficiencies (Tables S1 and S2) [34, 35] . As seen from Table S3 , it can be observed that research on H 2 utilization (FCs in this case) has been extensively pursued in comparison with production or storage. It can also be observed that research on H 2 in China is significantly most active, leading all the three technologies (also observed in Fig. 2 (b) Part I of this series) [1] , followed by the USA and Japan. Comparing to Li-ion battery electric vehicles (BEV), FCEVs have excellent performance in terms of driving range as well as fuel refilling time (~3e5 min). However, as the BEVs have superior grid-to-wheel efficiency and can be recharged either overnight at home or at commercial recharging stations, their commercial adaption has progressed much further than that of FCEVs. When considering the emissions associated with the manufacturing process, FC production is less energyintensive than batteries which in addition involves more hazardous materials in the manufacturing [36, 37] . Proton exchange membrane (PEMFC) is the preferred technology for FCEVs [38e40] . As shown in Table 1 It has been observed that the FC system should be designed for the FCEVs meeting cold-start ability (<30 s from À30 C) and durability (5000 h) ( Table 1) , as well as the driving range per filling, acceleration (0e100 kmph in <10 s) with the FC system power density as high as 7300 W L À1 [46] . Consumer FCEVs are close to the target of 5000 h of operation [47, 48] . In addition, a typical configuration of the FCEV powertrain is the fuel tank, fuel processor, FC subsystem, DC-DC converter, motor inverter, traction motor, and transmission [38] . In fact, high-performance FCs are being produced by Hyundai, Toyota, Honda, and GM to be used on their vehicles [38, 40] . With 100,000 and 500,000 FC units per year, the total system cost is projected to hit $50 and $45 per kW net , respectively, for light-duty vehicles with 80 kW net fuel cell stack [49] . In a study conducted with a volunteer group for examining driver acceptance of H 2 powered FCEVs, it was found that 75% of them would be willing to pay $40000 for a FCEV [50] and the adopters of FCEVs are the consumers with highincome owning several vehicles. If FCEVs are to penetrate the mass market, policymakers should find ways to encourage lower-income consumers to purchase them [51] . Due to the R&D activities, the PEMFC technology has achieved the technology readiness level and, therefore, automakers such as Toyota, Honda, and Hyundai have started selling and leasing their FCEV models with the yearly update, in various regions depending upon the H 2 refueling stations (HRS) infrastructure [52] . The specifications for the latest production FCEVs are compared in Table 2 [53e55]. The range per H 2 filling is well above 300 miles, which is much higher compared to batteryoperated EVs. i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y x x x ( x x x x ) x x x Buses, coaches and trucks As fuel cell cars are facing fierce competition from BEVs, the focus in FCEV development has shifted to heavy-duty applications where central refueling infrastructure can be utilized and where the total power train cost is less than in BEVs. Fast refueling times and high energy density (less weight than BEV), highlights the promising potential of FCEV towards the future of mobility [36, 56] . A more stringent durability requirement of 20,000 h (Table S4) for the FC engine has been specified for these heavy-duty applications in comparison to the 5000 h for the FCEVs (Table 1 ) [41] . The major advantage of fuel cell buses (FCB) is that they lead to a significant decrease in emissions, particularly in larger cities. Europe has been the leading region in the application of FCBs with more than 10 million km driven to date [57] . Fig. 3 shows how the cost of FCBs was reduced by almost a threefold over the last 10 years, while the cumulative number of buses in Europe (UK, France, Germany, Norway, Switzerland, Italy, and so on) rose to 850 [58] . This is expected to increase to 1100 and 1400 by 2024 and 2030, respectively with the cost reaching~V500,000 by 2030 [58] . In the USA only 38 FCBs were operating in early 2019 with availability ranging from 52 to 78% [59] . However, the number is expected to go up since more than 39 FC buses are in the developmental phase [60] . The largest number of FC buses is running in California, which is due to their environmental targets and HRS infrastructure [61] . In China, the Government subsidy supports the transportation sector to deploy FC buses. National companies intend to deliver hundreds of FCBs in the forthcoming years which requires a suitable H 2 infrastructure to be built. Korea and Japan have also announced their FCB activities. Even though the numbers are still rather low (37 new FCBs in Korea and 18 running in Japan in 2019), 100 buses were planned to be deployed for the Tokyo Olympics in Japan in 2020 (now stands cancelled due to COVID-19 pandemic), and a substantial increase is expected in both countries [59] . The first FCB program is launched also in India by Tata Motors Ltd [62] . FC trucks are being developed by Toyota, Hino, Daimler, Volvo, Hyundai, Hyzon Motors, and Nikola Motor Company [59,63e66] . It is imperative in urban areas to rely more on H 2 fueled trucks, since diesel trucks will be banned in city centers in many countries. The truck application is even more demanding than the bus. The stack durability goal of 50,000 h and the needed refueling rate is several times higher than the current automotive standard. For example, Hyundai Xcient fuel cell trucks are powered by a 190 kW FC system using two 95 kW stacks taken from NEXO. The seven tanks have H 2 storage capacity of 35 kg, which gives the truck a range of around 400 km. Nikola Motor Co. is developing FC powered heavy-duty trucks, to be launched in 2022 with 1200 km per tank of H 2 . Nikola is also planning 700 truck refueling stations by 2028 and it has at least 13,000 preorders for the trucks. Toyota Motor Corp. is working with Kenworth Truck Co. to jointly produce FC powered cargo-hauling trucks for California, with >500 km between H 2 fill-ups. Ultimate Targets [42] 2020 [44] 2030 [44] 2020 [41] 2030 [41] 2020 [45] 2030 [45] Peak power efficiency (%) 65 Material handling equipment (MHE) is considered as a promising niche market for FC deployment. This category comprises forklift trucks in warehouses and specialty vehicles in airports and harbors. FC powered forklift trucks offer better availability over battery-powered units due to fast refueling and they can be used indoors in contrast to diesel-powered units. Plug Power as the market leader has proven the commercial viability and sold over 20,000 FC forklifts with refueling systems [59] . Plug Power has joined hands with Amazon and Walmart to deploy FC powered forklifts in their fulfilment centers in the USA. While in Europe, Carrefour (leading food retail) has deployed 137 units in northeastern France [77] . The interest in the deployment of FC based MHE by leading companies such as Toyota Motor Corporation, BMW Manufacturing Co., Coca-Cola, FedEx Freight, Mercedes, Procter and Gamble, IKEA, Sysco, and others, indicate that the number of activities for deployment of FC MHEs continues to grow in the global market [78, 79] . This promises a transition from diesel-powered material handling systems towards H 2 FC based MHE [59] . Moreover, South Korea is also developing the world's first FC powered construction equipment, where Hyundai Motor Group in partnership with their construction wing aims to produce FC powered excavators at mass scale by 2023 [80] . In Table S6 , the state-of-the-art and future targets for forklifts are summarized [41] . FCs have been used for submarine propulsion for a long time. In 2019 TKMS (Germany) unveiled a 4th generation FC system for submarine applications with tested operational capability of 70,000 h [81] and Navantia is finalizing the construction of the first S80-class submarine with 300 kW FC stacks for the Spanish Navy. More recently, after demonstrations such as the Nemo H 2 passenger boat operating in Amsterdam channels, and the Energy Observer Yacht [82] promoting renewable energy over a seven-year world tour, FCs are considered as auxiliary power units (APU) to support the onboard electric loads (hotel loads) and for the propulsion of all types of marine vessels [83] . The EU through the Horizon2020 program and the FCH JU is supporting maritime FC deployment for prime propulsion or auxiliary loads with 150e600 kW as can be seen in [58] . Evidently, PEMFC is the most preferred power system for promoting zero carbon footprint, by using pure H 2 . In several countries actions have been undertaken to build H 2 -fueled ships and boats [59] . Powercell Sweden AB and Havyard Group (a Norwegian ship technology company) signed a contract to design and develop a FC system comprising of multiple 200 kW FC stacks (collective output 3.2 MW) for installation in one of Havila Kystruten's maritime vessel to be operated in Norwegian waters [84] . In Norway, fuel-cell vessels for 200 passengers and 60 cars are under construction. FC boats for inland waterways are planned in France. Bloom Energy and Samsung Heavy Industries intend to build solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) powered ships. Hyundai is building FC powered fishing boats. ABB in collaboration with Hydrog ene de France planned to develop megawatt-scale FC powered ships in order to curb the global GHG emissions since shipping constitutes 2.5% of the GHG emissions [85] . Toshiba Energy Systems supplied compact 30 kW FC systems (with increased volumetric power density,~three times to the stationary model) for powering Japanese maritime vessels [86] . FCs have been used to produce space power since the Gemini earth-orbiting mission in 1960s. The Gemini FC was an early version of the PEMFC technology. However, alkaline fuel cells (AFC) were selected for the Apollo program and the following space mission for several decades including the space shuttles [87, 88] . However, NASA is considering PEMFC and SOFC technologies for future missions [89] . The space FCs are supplied with cryogenic H 2 and O 2 , and the water produced is used by the crew on manned flights. FCs are also studied as a power source for small electric aircraft and as APUs for fullsize jet planes. The most recent advances in the technology have been piloted in the HY4, a four-passenger concept plane by the German Aerospace Research Institute DLR [90] . However, the first commercial aerospace application of FCs appears to be drones and UAVs where the flying time and range can be extended over Li-ion batteries. Doosan Mobility Innovation (South Korea) signed agreements with Microsoft, ReadyH2, and SkyFire Consulting (USA) to develop advanced FC powered drones for various applications [91] . HES Energy Systems (Singapore), Hy-Hybrid Energy (Scotland), and Goldi Mobility (Hungary) signed MoU to develop H 2 powered drones [92] . Leading FC companies such as Ballard, Hydrogenics, etc. are developing their offering for this market [93] . The state-ofthe-art and future targets for FC electric aircraft are summarized in Table S7 . Preliminary findings by the FCH JU and the Clean Sky JU [94] to be published in summer 2020 have shown that H 2 propulsion is the most promising solution for short-to medium-range aircraft in the next 15e20 years [58] . As a clean energy carrier, H 2 is primarily an alternative fuel in the transportation sector, which accounts for nearly 25% of the global primary energy consumption. The transportation sector faces two major challenges: (i) implementation of infrastructures for H 2 production, storage, transportation/distribution, and (ii) refueling, as well as the development of affordable fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV). Customers will have no incentive to buy FCEV until a convenient H 2 refueling station network is established, yet it is not commercially viable to construct a large number of HRS without adequate FCEVs, a chicken-and-egg dilemma [95, 96] . Therefore, fleet operators (buses, taxies, delivery vans) would be a more natural starting point for infrastructure development rather than FCEVs for private use. H 2 cannot use the existing distribution network for liquid fuels and requires new propulsion systems and technologies. However, the installation of new H 2 refueling infrastructure involves high investment risks and uncertainties, especially at the early stage of FCEV penetration. In order to overcome this challenge, a collaborative consortium involving infrastructure companies, car manufacturers, and the government can help to share the risks. R&D collaborations between the infrastructure and automotive companies are critical to ensure the simultaneous increase of the HRS and FCEV. Government policies such as subsidies or tax breaks are also necessary to i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y x x x ( x x x x ) x x x alleviate the high capital cost and long payback period. H 2 infrastructure establishment initiatives are taking place in the USA (California), Europe (Germany) and Asia (Japan). The German H 2 Mobility program has announced investment plans to build 1000 HRS by 2030 [97] and the Japan FC Commercialization Conference planned to build 1000H 2 HRS by 2025 [98] . Even though the FCEVs have a higher retail price than internal combustion engine vehicles, both the fuel (because of higher efficiency) and maintenance costs (with lesser number of rotating parts) are lower. The safety of H 2 refueling infrastructures also plays a critical role in customer acceptance for FCEVs. As of now, standards for connections, safety aspects, and performance requirements for H 2 refueling and FCEVs have been established through ISO and SAE standards [99] . The state-of-theart and future targets for HRS are summarized in Table S8 [41] . Stationary FC applications range from sub kilowatt backup power units to multi-megawatt power stations. As the large units typically use fossil fuels as the primary fuel in combination with high-temperature FC technology (SOFC, molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC)), they are not discussed in detail here. The most wide-spread FC application is domestic combined heat and power (CHP) units or better known as micro-CHP systems. In 2014, the Japanese (m-CHP) ENE-FARM project passed 100,000 sold systems, with roughly 300,000e350,000 cumulative installations by 2019 [59, 100] . The ambitious goal is to install 5.3 million systems by 2030 covering 10% of Japanese homes [100, 101] . In Europe, the targets are less ambitious. The target is to install more than 2500 systems by 2021 and deploy 10,000 systems annually thereafter [102, 103] . The state-of-the-art and future targets for m-CHP, 0.3e5 kW system, are summarized in Table S9 [41] . The South-Korean government has set a target of 100,000 m-CHP systems by 2020 [104] . In Japan, 93% of the systems installed are based on PEMFC technology. The systems have reached the target price of ¥800,000 (US$7350) per unit ( 1 kW), and no more subsidies are given. The price for a SOFC system ( 1 kW) is ¥1,230,000 (US$11,300). The micro-CHP systems use methane or LPG as a primary fuel, and a fuel processor is needed to produce H 2 to be fed to the FC module. No fuel processor is needed when H 2 is used as the primary fuel, which would simplify the micro-CHP system and decrease its cost. A micro-CHP system using green H 2 produced by wind power has been demonstrated in Lolland island, Denmark in collaboration with IRD fuel cells and local authorities [105] . A special case of the micro-CHP is an off-grid system where electrolytic H 2 is produced for on-site storage and reuse. Typically, such hybrid systems have been designed for residential applications (see Fig. 5 ), integrating photovoltaic panels for the production of electricity, short-term battery storage, electrolysis systems to provide the H 2 for long-term storage, and FCs to supply the electricity [106] . Although not economically feasible yet, commercialization efforts have started in Germany [107] . Backup power (BUP) for telecom towers is another early niche market for PEMFC and DMFC [108] . The number of units supplied by different suppliers are listed in Table S10. The average system size is 5 kW like for the MHE. Larger units are supplied to data centers and hospitals. However, as they mostly use natural gas as the primary fuel, they are not further discussed here. A large FC system typically uses natural gas or biogas as the primary fuel. South-Korea is the leading market for MW-scale prime FC power. MCFC used to be the leading technology choice. However, phosphoric acid fuel cell (PAFC) and SOFC technologies are gaining ground, and the leading technology providers Doosan (PAFC) and Bloom Energy (SOFC) are showing increasing interest in pure H 2 as the fuel for their systems [59] . Industrial by-product H 2 from processes like dehydrogenation and chlorine production offers here a niche application. Apart from being produced for on-site industrial usage, it must be considered that H 2 is also produced as a side stream or by-product. A few pilot plants where by-product H 2 is used for electricity generation in a PEMFC stack are known. The installation at the Akzo Nobel chlor-alkali plant (Delfzijl, the Netherlands) is one of the most representative, with a 70 kW FC starting in 2007 and having over 30,000 h of operation [10] . A scale-up of the technology has been demonstrated with the 1 MW PEMFC power plant in service at the SolVin chlorine plant in Antwerp-Lillo (Belgium) since 2012, and later being transported to Martinique for further operation [109] . The world's first 2 MW PEMFC power plant (with combined heat and power) is already operating in a chlor-alkali plant (Ynnovate Sanzheng Fine Chemicals Co Ltd) in Yingkou, China [110] . Based on such examples, it is foreseen that many opportunities (and challenges) are available for the chemical industry, in terms of introducing large-scale production of renewable H 2 . H 2 is considered one of the most prominent fuels due to it being clean (no emissions of CO X and soot) and its extremely high gravimetric energy density compared to fossil fuels. Due to its good flammability, H 2 can be employed as a combustion fuel in different types of burners, internal combustion engines, and turbines. The adiabatic flame temperature for H 2 (2045 C) in comparison with acetylene (2400 C), propane (1980 C) and methane (1957 C) in air, qualifies H 2 as an effective combustion fuel also for high-grade heat. A comparison of the combustion properties of H 2 with other fuels is provided in Table S11. In addition, the amount of energy liberated for H 2 combustion (LHV: 120 kJ g À1 ) is~2.5 times the heat of combustion of typical hydrocarbon fuels (gasoline (45 kJ g À1 ), diesel (43 kJ g À1 ), methane (50 kJ g À1 ), propane (46 kJ g À1 ), etc.). Hence, the H 2 mass required is~one third that of a typical hydrocarbon, for any specific load. However, the drawback of employing H 2 for combustion is due to the very low density of H 2 (i.e., the low volumetric energy density of ~10 MJ m À3 ) -an order of magnitude lower than that of the natural gas at STP, due to the very low molecular weight of H 2 . The flashpoint of H 2 is also extremely low (