key: cord-1041372-bn04z7g9
authors: Reis, Luís Roque; Castelhano, Luís; Gani, Kaamil; Almeida, Gustavo; Escada, Pedro
title: Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Patients: Experience at a Tertiary Center in the First 11 Months of the Pandemic
date: 2021-08-15
journal: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02795-3
sha: e56d1fbc3cbc51ce40f28f79105794fb2258ffaf
doc_id: 1041372
cord_uid: bn04z7g9

This study aimed to evaluate the experience of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients in a Southern Europe tertiary hospital. Retrospective observational study in tracheostomized patients from April 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. Data related to tracheostomy were evaluated in patients with and without COVID-19, including infections in healthcare professionals involved in patient care. Forty-two tracheostomies were performed in COVID-19 patients aged 68.4 ± 11.1 years, predominantly men (71%) and caucasians (81%). They had at least 1 comorbidity (93%), on average 3. The most frequent were heart disease (71%), age > 65 years (67%) diabetes (40%) and obesity (33%). The greater number of comorbidities was associated with the lesser probability of the patient's recovery (p = .001). Age (p = .047) and renal failure (p = .013) were associated with higher mortality. Patients were tracheostomized by prolonged endo-tracheal intubation (50%), pneumonia (33%) and extubation failure (10%). Ventilation time before the tracheostomy (22.9 ± 6.5 days) was higher than ventilation time after the tracheostomy (7.1 ± 15.1 days) (p < 0.001). No differences were found in ventilation time (p = 0.094) and tracheostomy time (p = 0.514) in the different indications. There were 3 minor complications (7.1%), 25 discharges (60%) and 11 deaths (26%). During the same period 49 tracheostomies were performed in patients without COVID-19, with a homogeneous gender and age distribution, 31% without comorbidities, with an average of 1 comorbidity per patient and higher mortality (43%). Tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients proved to be a safe procedure for both patients and healthcare professionals and improves the clinical outcome of patients with severe infection. The 21-day procedure timing seems adequate. Comorbidities played an essential role in patient´s recovery. Age and renal failure are associated with a worse vital prognosis.

COVID-19 is the disease caused by the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), which was first observed in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and it quickly spread around the world. Because the virus is highly contagious, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. As of February 13, 2021 , this pandemic has resulted in 110,609,979 confirmed cases and 2,452,510 deaths in 215 countries [1] .

Epidemiological studies from different countries show that most infected patients are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms ([ 80%), while 14% have a serious illness and need to be hospitalized [2] [3] [4] . Among hospitalized patients, the presence and severity of respiratory failure are usually the most important causes for intensive care unit (ICU) admission where patients receive ventilatory support (noninvasive or invasive ventilation) [4, 5] . Approximately 3-17% of hospitalized patients require invasive mechanical ventilation [6] [7] [8] [9] , and about 10% of patients who are admitted to the ICU will require prolonged intubation for more than 14 days [10] . In these cases, tracheostomy has been considered [2, 4, 5, [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] .

The ideal time for tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 has not been determined. Epidemiological data on the Portuguese National Health System's experience on this matter is also unknown. This represents a considerable knowledge gap, particularly after January 2021, when Portugal was the country with the highest number of new daily cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection per million inhabitants [18] .

The aim of this study was to evaluate the experience of performing a tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients at a tertiary hospital center in southern Europe. The study evaluated patients' characteristics, clinical course, comorbidities, outcome, indications, and timing for tracheostomy. It also evaluated data from patients without COVID-19 who underwent tracheostomy in the same period. Finally, it checked whether there was a record of infection in the health professionals who were involved in these procedures.

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee for Health (CES) at the Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental (CHLO) no. 2142/21, Lisbon on May 26, 2021.

Patients were selected from the hospital's database, and their records were available through the Information Systems and Technologies Service (SSTI) at CHLO, EPE. All patients who underwent tracheostomy at the CHLO from April 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021 (11 months) were considered. Patients were admitted to the emergency department, which, since the beginning of the pandemic period, has operated under triage criteria that are specific for COVID-19, as defined by a national health regulation. Our emergency department provides health care to an estimated population of 439,944 inhabitants (based on the 2011 census). This is a region on the west coast of Portugal, with a predominantly Caucasian population, in which access to health care is universal but subject to payment (moderating fee) for medical care.

The time frame considered for this study was 11 months, from April 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021. The following data were collected: gender, age, previous medical history, presenting symptoms, comorbidities, period under mechanical ventilation, time from intubation to tracheostomy, time from tracheostomy to decannulation, complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Ventilator release was defined as the first full 24-h period without assisted mechanical ventilation. Several comorbidities that reflect the most serious findings of the disease that were reported in the literature have been studied, and are as follows: heart disease, respiratory disease, age, diabetes, and renal failure. A body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m 2 , which is defined as obesity by the WHO, was considered to be a risk factor.

The data were entered into a Microsoft ExcelÒ spreadsheet, and statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social SciencesÒ (SPSS) version 26.0 for Microsoft WindowsÒ created by IBM, Illinois, Chicago, USA.

In a first phase, we tested the assumptions for the use of parametric tests to choose the most appropriate tests. All data were checked for normal distribution and homogeneity, and the appropriate statistical tests were selected based on the results. The Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between the number of comorbidities and the outcome (recovered/died), and the Chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between each comorbidity and the outcome. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare mechanical ventilation time before and after tracheostomy.

To mitigate viral transmission during this aerosol-generating surgical procedure, tracheostomies were performed in accordance with the recommendations of the Portuguese Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, which included the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), minimizing the number of people present in the operating room, and the use of a negative room pressure [19] . All tracheostomies were open surgeries (no cricothyroidotomies were performed) that were performed by 11 surgeons at the two hospitals that comprise the CHLO. The authors verified if there was any record of an infection in the health professionals who were involved in the procedures. Because most of the patients did not experience viral elimination 21 days after the onset of symptoms (although viral detection may not truly reflect the patient's infectious potential) [11, 12] , it was institutionally decided to avoid tracheostomy before 21 days of endotracheal intubation. This timing was decreased in cases where intensivists justified that tracheostomies should be performed earlier for reasons such as the need for a pulmonary toilet or to reduce and suspend sedation.

From April 1, 2020 to February 28, 2021, 101 tracheostomies were performed, 42 of which in patients with COVID-19 ( Table 1 ). The patients were predominantly male (30 patients, 71%), with an average age of 68.4 ± 11.1 years (range between 47 and 90 years). Thirty-four patients were caucasian (81%), which can be explained by the demographic composition of the institution's area of influence. Thirty-nine patients (93%) had at least 1 comorbidity, with an average of 3 comorbidities per patient.

The most frequently reported comorbidities were heart disease (71% of patients), diabetes (40%) and obesity (33%). Other rare and isolated comorbidities included HIV infection, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, overlap syndrome (Sjogren/systemic sclerosis/polychondritis) and post-kidney transplant status. There was a moderate, positive and statistically significant correlation between the number of comorbidities and the outcome (recovery/death) (rk = 0.44; p = 0.001): the greater the number of comorbidities, the lower was the patient likely to recover.

There was a statistically significant relationship between age comorbidity and the outcome and between renal failure comorbidity and the outcome. The results show that these two comorbidities are associated with a higher probability of death (Table 2) . Although heart disease comorbidity was the most common in patients with tracheostomy, it was not found to be associated with a worse outcome.

Prolonged orotracheal intubation (OTI) was the most common indication for tracheostomy (21 patients, 50%), followed by pneumonia (14 patients, 33%), extubation failure (4 patients, 10%) and vocal cords paresis (2 patients, 5%) ( Table 3) .

At the date of the study, 25 patients (60%) had been discharged and 6 remained hospitalized (Table 4 ). There were minor complications related to the procedure in 3 patients (7.1%), which included hemorrhage (2 patients) and subcutaneous emphysema (1 patient).

The mean time of intubation before the tracheostomy, defined as the time from the first intubation to the tracheostomy, was 22.9 ± 6.5 days, with a range from 11 to 39 days. The 4 patients who failed extubation required reintubation before tracheostomy. The mean ventilation time after tracheostomy was 7.1 ± 15.1, with a range from 0 to 40 days. The average time from tracheostomy to decannulation was 27.5 ± 19.8 days, with a range from 3 to 99 days. The total time of assisted ventilation was 29.5 ± 11.4 days, with a range from 12 to 68 days.

The ventilation time before the tracheostomy was longer than the ventilation time after the tracheostomy (Z = -5.342; p \ 0.001). No differences were found in the ventilation time (F = 2,288; p = 0.094) and in the tracheostomy time (F = 0.777; p = 0.514) between the different indications. In these recovered patients, hospitalization ranged from 27 to 127 days (60.2 ± 31.6). In COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy, the mortality rate was 26% (11 patients). In these patients the mean oral intubation time before tracheostomy was 25.4 ± 6 days, with a 19 to 35 days variation, the mean time of hospital stay, in these patients, was 32.6 ± 9.4 with a 19 to 55 days variation. There was no immediate postoperative or tracheostomy related deaths. In the patients that died, the mean time from tracheostomy to death was 7.6 ± 5.3 days with a variation from 2 to 20 days. In the recovered patients the length of hospital stay was from 27 to 127 days (60.2 ± 31.6).

During the 11 months studied, 49 non-COVID-19 related tracheostomies was performed ( Table 5 ). The gender and age distribution were similar to the COVID-19 patients: 28 were male (57%), 21 female (43%), mean age 65 ± 17.2 years (variation 26 to 95 years), 44 patients were Caucasian (90%). Fifteen patients (31%) had no comorbidities, and there was a mean of 1 comorbidity per patient. Besides advanced age (53% of the patients), the more frequent were Cardiac illness (29%), Diabetes (24%) and Obesity (20%).

Non-COVID-19 patients submitted to tracheostomy had a prolonged hospital stay (69.5 ± 55.1 days), in compare to the hospital stay in similar patients that didn't underwent tracheostomy (neurologic, tumoral, trauma and vascular) ( Table 6 ). In these patients there was also a high mortality rate (43%, 21 patients). There were few tracheostomy related complications (8.1%) that included post-operative bleeding in 3 patients and cannula exteriorization in 1 patient. Ventilation time form admission to tracheostomy was shorter than COVID-19 patients (13 ± 8.6 days), due to a precocious ICU indication, however the time with tracheostomy was longer (46.5 ± 32.8 days).

In our study there was viral transmission to any of the involved healthcare professional staff (surgical team or ward team).

This study supports important conclusions about the use of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 because it included a considerable number of procedures that were performed since the beginning of the pandemic and for a considerable period of time, which included a time when Portugal was the country with the highest number of daily cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection per million inhabitants. During the study period, 42 tracheostomies were performed in patients with COVID-19, and 49 tracheostomies were performed in patients without COVID-19. Thus, the number of these procedures almost doubled because of the disease. This necessarily has consequences from an organizational point of view for otorhinolaryngology services and for operating theaters and the ICU to ensure that all patients who are candidates for tracheostomy and who are referred for the procedure undergo the procedure quickly.

Some comorbidities influence the prognosis of patients with COVID-19. Our study identified a higher rate of these comorbidities in patients with COVID-19 (mean of three comorbidities) compared to patients without COVID (mean of one comorbidity). The higher number of comorbidities were found to negatively influence patient recovery, and older age and renal failure were shown to be associated with higher mortality in these patients. However, the mortality of patients who undergo tracheostomy due to a disease other than COVID-19 was higher because of the underlying disease (e.g., neurological, trauma, or vascular reasons).

The advantages for tracheostomy in patients with prolonged intubation are the reduction of mechanical ventilation time [20] , length of ICU stay [21] , mortality [22] , risk of developing subglottic stenosis [23] , and use of sedation [21] , and there is an improvement in the pulmonary toilet [24] . COVID-19 patients tend to stay longer in the ICU, and many of them remain intubated for 1 to 2 weeks or more [2] . The indications for tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients in our study were similar to those in non-COVID patients. Many patients do not attempt early weaning on assisted ventilation (for example, in the first week), although this does not appear to be a predictive factor in the inability to wean and extubate. However, some patients end up needing a tracheostomy (\ 10% of ICU admissions) [13, 14, 16, 25] . In our study, there was no higher rate of tracheostomy due to extubation failure in patients with COVID-19, nor were there any differences in ventilation and tracheostomy time on the basis of the indications.

Tracheostomies in patients with COVID-19 were performed 22.9 ± 6.5 days after endotracheal intubation, which was about 1 week after patients without COVID-19. The timing of the procedure was influenced by several factors, including recommendations of some scientific societies such as the Portuguese Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, which argues that tracheostomy should be performed only when considered absolutely necessary and as late as possible, ideally in a period without active infection (21) . Tracheostomies that were performed by otorhinolaryngology were associated with better survival [17] , and the timing of 21 days to perform the tracheostomy was considered to be adequate [4, 5, 17, 26] .

In non-COVID patients, changes in practice have led intensivists to indicate tracheostomy on day 7 to 10 after initial intubation [20] to maximize ICU resource availability [15, 27] . In COVID-19 patients, although tracheostomy is feasible at the referred timing after initial intubation [28] , it seems advisable to proceed beyond this period of time due to safety concerns for the healthcare professionals. The procedure can be considered before 21 days in exceptional situations of prolonged ventilator dependence, high risk of transmission, poor prognosis for intubated and ventilated patients [11] [12] [13] 29] , greater need for pulmonary toilet, or high sedation levels [24] .

In recovered patients, the tracheostomy time (from procedure to decannulation) was significantly shorter in patients with COVID-19 (27.5 ± 19.8 days) compared to patients without COVID-19 (46.5 ± 32.8), which is a positive indicator of respiratory improvement in patients with COVID-19.

For the tracheostomies that were performed in both patients with COVID-19 and patients without COVID-19, the complication rate was low (7%-8%), and the complications that were recorded were minor complications. The surgical teams had the option to perform the tracheostomies in an operating room with all the appropriate conditions for the positioning, comfort, and safety of patients and professionals and with the availability of all the required equipment and devices to perform the procedure and resolve any complications immediately.

Although the risk of coronavirus transmission to healthcare professionals is high during procedures such as tracheostomy (after endotracheal intubation, which has a higher risk, the odds ratio [OR] was 6.6, and for a noninvasive determination, the OR was 3.1 [30] ), in our study, there was no transmission of the virus to health professionals. For all teams and all patients, all safety recommendations that were proposed by the authorities and national and international health societies of scientific research were followed.

The limitations of this study include the retrospective collection of medical records, which can affect the accuracy of the data. The data were collected by three researchers to increase its reliability. On the date of data collection, many patients remained hospitalized, and thus, results, complications, and mortality may be underreported.

Tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients is indicated in hospitalized patients with severe disease and prolonged orotracheal intubation. The procedure, which is performed after day 21 of endotracheal intubation, was shown to be safe and beneficial. In these patients, there was a mortality rate of 26%, but the reason for death was not related to the procedure. There was also a low rate of complications, with only minor complications occurring in these patients.

The release of assisted ventilation was quick, and there were no safety problems for the health professionals who were involved in the procedure. Otorhinolaryngology services and operating rooms need to adapt to accommodate a significantly larger number of tracheostomies that need to be performed under more demanding safety conditions.

Baseline Characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected With SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region

Characteristics, outcomes, and trends of patients with COVID-19-related critical illness at a learning health system in the United States

Outcome of 1890 tracheostomies for critical COVID-19 patients: a national cohort study in Spain

Elective tracheostomy during COVID-19 outbreak: to whom, when, how? Early experience from Venice

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan

Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients With 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

2020) Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the

National Tracheostomy Safety Project. Multidisciplinary COVID-19 tracheostomy guidance

Guidelines from the Covid-19 tracheotomy task force aWGotASCotUoPHS, tracheotomy in ventilated patients with COVID-19

Response to comment on: tracheotomy in ventilated patients with COVID-19

Tracheostomy during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: recommendations from the New York head and neck society

Elective tracheostomy during mechanical ventilation in patients affected by COVID-19: preliminary case series from Lombardy

Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 era: global and multidisciplinary guidance

Tracheostomy management during the COVID-19 pandemic

Tracheotomy Outcomes in 64 Ventilated COVID-19 Patients at a High

Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center

Recomendações para a realização de traqueotomia em doente com COVID-19

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation

Early versus late tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head

Timing of tracheotomy in ICU patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Risk factors for adult laryngotracheal stenosis: a review of 74 cases

Surgical Tracheostomy outcomes in COVID-19-positive patients

Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham C-at (2020) Safety and 30-day outcomes of tracheostomy for COVID-19: a prospective observational cohort study

Tracheotomy in a high-volume center during the COVID-19 pandemic: evaluating the surgeon's risk

Novel percutaneous tracheostomy for critically ill patients with COVID-19

Early Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Association With Hospital Mortality and Factors Associated With Removal of Tracheostomy Tube at ICU Discharge

Recommendations from the CSO-HNS taskforce on performance of tracheotomy during the COVID-19 pandemic

Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations