key: cord-1040608-nx5a9bq9
authors: Subramoney, Kathleen; Hellferscee, Orienka; Pretorius, Marthi; Tempia, Stefano; McMorrow, Meredith; von Gottberg, Anne; Wolter, Nicole; Variava, Ebrahim; Dawood, Halima; Kahn, Kathleen; Walaza, Sibongile; Madhi, Shabir A.; Cohen, Cheryl; Venter, Marietjie; Treurnicht, Florette K.
title: Human bocavirus, coronavirus, and polyomavirus detected among patients hospitalised with severe acute respiratory illness in South Africa, 2012 to 2013
date: 2018-07-18
journal: Health Sci Rep
DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.59
sha: 66a3eded4d7bae681a0079a333c4acb75fe05828
doc_id: 1040608
cord_uid: nx5a9bq9

AIM: To investigate the prevalence of human bocavirus (hBoV), human coronaviruses (hCoV), and human polyomaviruses (hPyV) among patients with severe acute respiratory illness (SARI), in South Africa. METHODS: The study included 680 South African patients randomly selected in age‐defined categories from hospitalised patients enrolled through SARI surveillance during 2012 to 2013. A multiplex reverse transcription real‐time polymerase chain reaction assay was used to detect hBoV; hCoV‐OC43, hCoV‐229E, hCoV‐NL63, and hCoV‐HKU1; and Washington University hPyV (hPyV‐WU) and Karolinska Insitute hPyV (hPyV‐KI), in respiratory tract specimens collected from patients with SARI. All respiratory specimens from patients enrolled through SARI surveillance were also routinely tested by multiplex reverse transcription real‐time polymerase chain reaction for adenovirus; enterovirus; human metapneumovirus; parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3; respiratory syncytial virus; rhinovirus; influenza A, and influenza B. RESULTS: Human bocavirus, hCoV‐229E, and hPyV‐WU were detected in 3.7% (25/680), 4.1% (28/680), and 4.1% (28/680) of respiratory specimens, respectively. All other viruses were detected in <2% of specimens. Rhinovirus was the most common coinfecting virus (21.4%‐60.7%), followed by adenovirus (21.4%‐39.3%), and respiratory syncytial virus (10.7%‐24.0%). Testing for the additional viruses (hBoV, hCoV, and hPyV) decreased the number of specimens that initially tested negative by 2.9% (20/680). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of laboratory tests for hBoV, hCoV‐229E, and hPyV‐WU in differential testing algorithms for surveillance and diagnostics for suspected cases of respiratory illness of unknown cause may improve our understanding of the etiology of SARI, especially in a country like South Africa with a high number of immune compromised persons.

Results: Human bocavirus, hCoV-229E, and hPyV-WU were detected in 3.7% (25/ 680), 4.1% (28/680), and 4.1% (28/680) of respiratory specimens, respectively. All other viruses were detected in <2% of specimens. Rhinovirus was the most common coinfecting virus (21.4%-60.7%), followed by adenovirus (21.4%-39.3%), and respiratory syncytial virus (10.7%-24.0%). Testing for the additional viruses (hBoV, hCoV, and hPyV) decreased the number of specimens that initially tested negative by 2.9% (20/680).

Conclusion: Inclusion of laboratory tests for hBoV, hCoV-229E, and hPyV-WU in differential testing algorithms for surveillance and diagnostics for suspected cases of respiratory illness of unknown cause may improve our understanding of the etiology of SARI, especially in a country like South Africa with a high number of immune compromised persons. 

For consenting patients, HIV results were obtained from medical records available at the time of enrollment, or testing of dried-blood spots were performed at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa. Human immunodeficiency virus testing included polymerase chain reaction (PCR)for children aged <18 months and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for patients aged ≥18 months.

Nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected from children aged <5 years, and combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from persons aged ≥5 years. Specimens were placed in viral (Highveld Biological, Johannesburg, South Africa) or universal (Copan, Murrieta, California, USA) transport medium and stored at 2 to 8°C.

Within 72 hours of collection, the specimens were transported to the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (Johannesburg, South Africa) for testing. Respiratory specimens were stored at −70°C.

After sorting by collection date, a subset of respiratory specimens was randomly selected in age-categories (<1, 1-4, 5-24, 25-44, 45-65, and > 65 years of age), for inclusion in this study. From a total of 5784 specimens collected during the surveillance period, every eighth specimen was then systematically selected for inclusion in this study to obtain a study sample of 680 (11.8%).

The specimens were tested using a multiplex reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay for the following viruses: hBoV, hCoV-OC43, hCoV-229E, hCoV-NL63, hCoV-HKU1, hPyV-WU, and hPyV-KI. 11, 12 The RT-qPCR assay was performed using parameters and cycling conditions previously described, 2 with the following modifications: 2.27 μM anchored-oligo (dT) 18 primer and 54.55 μM random hexamer primer was used in the reverse transcription reaction. The respiratory specimens from SARI surveillance were also routinely tested by multiplex RT-qPCR assay for AdV, enterovirus, HMPV, PIV types 1 to 3, RSV, RV, INFA, and INFB. 2

Prevalence of hBoV, hCoV, and hPyV viruses were compared between age groups, HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected individuals, and individuals with and without non-HIV underlying medical conditions (predominantly, asthma, heart disease, pregnancy, diabetes, seizure disorders, and malnutrition) using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Stata® version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA) was used to implement the analysis. 

Among the patients included in this study, children aged <1 year accounted for the largest proportion of cases (46.8%; 318/680). Among individuals with available information, the HIV prevalence was 30.5%

(204/668), and the prevalence of non-HIV underlying medical conditions was 7.5% (51/678). CD4 + count information was only available for a limited number of individuals; therefore, these results could not be utilized. Age distribution and HIV prevalence of cases included in and excluded from this study were statistically similar (Table 1 ).

Among the hBoV, hCoV, and hPyV, hBoV (3.7%; 25/680), hCoV-229E (4.1%; 28/680), and hPyV-WU (4.1%; 28/680) were the most frequently detected. Human coronaviruses-OC43, hCoV-NL63, hCoV-HKU1, and hPyV-KI were each detected in <2% of specimens ( 

The detection rate of hBoV, hCoV, and hPyV-WU was <4.2%. Children Although we detected hBoV in 3.7% (25/680) of specimens, we did not test these cases for hBoV mRNA or viral DNA load to assess the proportion of cases with active infection as described by Xu et al. 13 In a similar study conducted in South Africa during 2006 to 2007, 610 hospitalised children aged <5 years that required medical attention or hospitalization were tested for several respiratory viruses including those tested in our study 14 . Among these children, hBoV, hCoV-229E, and hPyV-WU were detected in 6.1% (37/610), 0.3%

(2/610), and 3.4% (21/610) of specimens, respectively. In our study, a higher prevalence of hCoV-229E was reported (Table 2 ). This may be due to the different case definitions used in the 2 studies. Findings similar to ours were reported in a study conducted in the Gulf region in children <5 years of age. In the latter study, the reported detection rates for these viruses were 4.9% (14/331) hBoV and hCoV-229E, and 3.5% (10/331) hPyV-WU. 5 Globally, hBoV and hPyV-WU are predominantly observed in children aged <4 years with upper and lower respiratory tract infection, which was also observed in our study. 15 A recent South African study found that among children aged <1 year, hBoV (but not hCoV) detection was significantly associated with severe illness. 16 Human polyomaviruses was not investigated in the latter study. Therefore, inclusion of laboratory tests for hBoV, hCoV-229E, and hPyV-WU in differential testing algorithms for surveillance and diagnostics for suspected cases of respiratory illness of unknown cause may improve our understanding of the etiology of SARI, especially in a country like South Africa with a high number of immune compromised persons.

This study has limitations that warrant discussion. First, only patients with SARI were included in this study. As no control participant group was evaluated, the association and/or fraction of hBoV, hCoV, and hPyV detections that may contribute to severe respiratory illness could not be investigated. Second, the sample size was too small. Sero-prevalence data for South Africa is lacking; therefore, using 50% expected prevalence to obtain the biggest sample size for a 95% confidence interval, a 5% desired absolute precision, and a design effect of 1, plus inflation by 25% for spoilage/quality of samples, the annual expected sample for the study should have been 480 (960 for the 2 years). Lastly, the study duration was too short, as a 4-to 5-year period is required to assess seasonality and, therefore, the seasonality of HBoV, hCoV, and hPyV was not determined.

In conclusion, while low, the prevalence of hBoV, hCoV-229E, and hPyV-WU were similar to or higher than some other important viruses commonly tested for such as HMPV, PIV types 1 to 3, INFA, and INFB.

Including tests for hBoV, hCoV, and hPyV viruses in differential diag- 

Human coronaviruses in severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) cases in South West India

Respiratory viral coinfections identified by a 10-Plex real-time reverse-Transcription polymerase chain reaction assay in patients hospitalised with severe acute respiratory illness-South Africa

Respiratory viruses other than influenza virus: impact and therapeutic advances

Clinical and epidemiological profiles of novel viruses in lower respiratory

The prevalence of human bocavirus, human coronavirus-NL63, human metapneumovirus, human polyomavirus KI and WU in respiratory tract infections in Kuwait

High prevalence of antibodies against polyomavirus WU, polyomavirus KI, and human bocavirus in German blood donors

World Health Organization. WHO global technical consultation: global standards and tools for influenza surveillance

World Health Organization. Global epidemiological surveillance standards for influenza

Clinical epidemiology of bocavirus, rhinovirus, two polyomaviruses and four coronaviruses in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected South African children

Mortality amongst patients with influenza-associated severe acute respiratory illness, South Africa

Identification of a third human polyomavirus

A singletube, real-time PCR assay for detection of the two newly characterized human KI and WU polyomaviruses

Comparative diagnosis of human bocavirus 1 respiratory infection by mRNA RT-PCR, DNA quantitative PCR and serology

Contribution of common and recently described respiratory viruses to annual hospitalizations in children in South Africa

The role of infections and coinfections with newly identified and emerging respiratory viruses in children

Aetiology of childhood pneumonia in a well vaccinated South African birth cohort: a nested case-control study

Human bocavirus, coronavirus, and polyomavirus detected among patients hospitalised with severe acute respiratory illness in South Africa

We would like to thank the site surveillance teams and data management team at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases.

This work was supported by the National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (cooperative agreement no. 5U51IP000155).

No conflict of interest was declared by any of the coauthors.