key: cord-1038781-kckszzlr
authors: Damiano, Rodolfo F.; Di Santi, Talita; Beach, Scott; Pan, Pedro M.; Lucchetti, Alessandra L.; Smith, Felicia A.; Forlenza, Orestes V.; Fricchione, Gregory L.; Miguel, Eurípedes C.; Lucchetti, Giancarlo
title: Mental health interventions following COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections: a systematic review of current recommendations and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
date: 2021-04-12
journal: Braz J Psychiatry
DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1582
sha: 36a40c1f4f4b3deae33cb6fa545719b99b451a3e
doc_id: 1038781
cord_uid: kckszzlr

OBJECTIVE: To review the most common mental health strategies aimed at alleviating and/or preventing mental health problems in individuals during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other coronavirus pandemics. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature assessing three databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, and PsycINFO). A meta-analysis was performed with data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). For non-RCT studies, a critical description of recommendations was performed. RESULTS: From a total of 2,825 articles, 125 were included. Of those, three RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the interventions promoted better overall mental health outcomes as compared to control groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.87 [95%CI 0.33-1.41], p < 0.001, I(2) = 69.2%), but did not specifically improve anxiety (SMD = 0.98 [95%CI -0.17 to 2.13], p > 0.05; I(2) = 36.8%). Concerning the systematic review, we found a large body of scientific literature proposing recommendations involving psychological/psychiatric interventions, self-care, education, governmental programs, and the use of technology and media. CONCLUSIONS: We found a large body of expert recommendations that may help health practitioners, institutional and governmental leaders, and the general population cope with mental health issues during a pandemic or a crisis period. However, most articles had a low level of evidence, stressing the need for more studies with better design (especially RCTs) investigating potential mental health interventions during COVID-19. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020190212.

Pandemics have historically been more destructive and devastating in terms of morbidity and mortality than any other type of world disaster, rivaled only by human-made disasters of war and genocidal murder. Nevertheless, empirical data on mental health impacts of pandemics has been meager in comparison to what has been reported for natural or human-made disasters. Though disasterrelated mental health research has increased in recent years, most pandemics in the last century have generated limited study. 1 In early March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak a pandemic with unpredictable consequences. 2 Almost 1 year later, more than 112 million individuals have been infected, with almost 2.5 million deaths worldwide caused by the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. 3 Furthermore, even though COVID-19 was initially described mainly as a respiratory disease, accumulating evidence suggests that several other systems are affected, and neuropsychiatric complications may play an important role in the overall disease burden. 4, 5 A recent meta-analysis has shown that, similar to other coronaviruses (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 [SARS-CoV-1] and Middle East respiratory syndrome [MERS] ), SARS-CoV-2 may affect the central nervous system (CNS) in many different ways, including acute, subacute, and chronic neurological and psychiatric impairments. 6 Many acute neuropsychiatric events have been described, such as encephalopathy, delirium, anosmia, and ageusia 7 ; the former two presumably relate to systemic/indirect insults to the brain, whereas the latter may reflect a specific mechanism through which the virus would directly affect nerve cells and/or damage support cells in the neuroepithelium. [8] [9] [10] [11] Higher rates of depression, anxiety, suicidal behavior, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been associated with prior viral pandemics including SARS and MERS, suggesting similar patterns may emerge with COVID-19. 6, 12, 13 A recent study 14 investigating a clinical sample of COVID-19 survivors 1-month after hospital discharge reported high rates of mental health symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, PTSD, insomnia, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, which were directly related to baseline immune inflammation of exposed individuals during hospitalization. 14 There are several processes through which a coronavirus can cause neuropsychiatric diseases. Potential neuropathological mechanisms include acute injury to nasal and gustative cells with trans-synaptic flow into the brain, as well direct viral injury to brain tissue via bloodbrain barrier (BBB) diapedesis, which generates a glial neuroinflammatory response. Even without viral transfer into the brain itself, there may be indirect CNS effects when cytokine storm results from breaches in the BBB, particularly via fenestrated endothelium and endotheliitis. This neuroinflammatory cascade can promote a hypercoagulability state leading to CNS thrombotic events and further injury to the BBB. 6, 7, 15 Moreover, there are also possible environmental reasons for psychiatric morbidity. For example, individuals may develop stress due to social isolation, loneliness, economic burden, and unemployment following the pandemic, stigma, and several others. [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] Given the fact that more than 20 million individuals have been infected, many of whom will develop psychiatric symptoms, it is possible that we might face a wave of neuropsychiatric diseases in the upcoming months and years. 7 Within this context, experts around the world have proposed preventive and therapeutic strategies to manage mental health sequelae, largely based on their personal experiences and on the knowledge derived from other pandemics. [23] [24] [25] [26] Understanding the current evidence obtained through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial to guide mental health and other health practitioners. Likewise, understanding the opinions of mental health experts could potentially help in the development of future guidelines and in the design of clinical trials in order to minimize the mental health burden in this and future pandemic crises. However, at the present moment, there is a lack of systematic evidence and a scarcity of evidence-based practice recommendations regarding mental health preventive and management strategies in the COVID-19 pandemic, both individually and at a population level. Such evidence could possibly guide clinicians and health managers worldwide, helping to mitigate the mental health consequences of this and other pandemics.

Thus, the goal of this study was to review the current scientific literature regarding the most common mental health strategies available with the aim of alleviating and/ or preventing mental health problems (e.g., depression, anxiety, PTSD, and suicidal behavior) in individuals during COVID-19 and other coronaviruses pandemics. Moreover, we investigated the possible effectiveness of mental health interventions, as compared to control groups, based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

The present study was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. 27, 28 A meta-analysis was performed with RCT results, and for non-RCT studies a critical description of recommendations was performed with all included articles. The study was registered on the PROSPERO 29 platform under registration CRD42020190212.

The following criteria were applied for inclusion of studies in this review: articles addressing preventive and/or management strategies to handle mental health issues in laypersons and health professionals during the COVID-19, SARS, or MERS pandemics. For the meta-analysis, only RCTs reporting effect sizes and/or full data on means, standard deviations (SD), and sample sizes for each group were included; whereas for the descriptive analysis, all articles (letters to the editor, editorials, opinion essays, guidelines, observational studies) were included. No language or date restrictions were applied.

Exclusion criteria were non-coronavirus-related articles and articles that did not describe interventions or provide recommendations for the prevention or management of mental health concerns.

The literature search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, and PsycINFO) from inception to June 3, 2020. Moreover, a hand search was performed on three pre-print databases (medRxiv, bioRxiv, PsyArXiv) in order to find additional articles. Key words were derived from meetings of the researchers and based on literature reviews, including a recent literature review on the prevalence of mental health problems due to COVID-19 infections. 6 

The selection of studies was conducted in three stages.

Two independent authors (RFD and TDS) screened simultaneously all references in the three databases using the search strategies described earlier. Duplicates were excluded using the Endnote software. Both authors determined eligibility based on title and/or abstract. Any article suggesting or recommending mental health interventions or presenting original data regarding any kind of interventions that might help mental health practitioners, governmental leaders, and educators around the world deal with the emergent mental health crisis were considered and included. Any disagreements between researchers were discussed with a third party (GL), and a final decision was made. All included articles on stage 1 were available to stage 2.

The selected articles were read in full by the same independent researchers (RFD and TDS). Both authors independently analyzed the data focusing on the eligibility criteria and extracted the following variables: authors, first author, year of publication, journal, language, type of study, type of intervention (preventive or management), targeted population (health care workers, laypersons, etc.), and category of recommendation. Articles that did not meet eligibility criteria in stage 2 were excluded. In the descriptive analysis, the authors grouped the most common mental health interventions and recommendations and, based on this information, they determined the following groups: psychological/psychiatric interventions, complementary and alternative therapies, self-care, technology and media, education, governmental programs, general recommendations, spirituality and religiousness, health care institutions, and physical intervention. Each article could have more than one category of recommendation, and any disagreement between researchers was again discussed with a third party (GL).

All information was compiled, and an expert summary provided. RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria were included for meta-analysis. Practical recommendations for laypersons, mental health care workers, and agencies were summarized.

Each RCT was assessed using the Cochrane Back Review Group Criteria List for Methodological Quality Assessment 30 by two independent authors (RFD and TDS). This assessment covers the following methodological items: A = randomization method; B = allocation concealed; C = similar baseline; D = patient blinded; E = provider blinded; F = assessor blinded; G = cointervention avoided; H = acceptable compliance; I = acceptable drop out; J = timing of outcome of assessment similar; and K = intention to treat analysis. A score ranging from 0 to 11 was used.

The software Meta-Essentials was employed for the meta-analysis. All outcomes provided by each article were included. For studies that had more than one outcome group (e.g., anxiety, depression, somatization), analyses were carried out separately for each group, with studies labeled with a letter in parentheses (e.g., ''b'') for each of these comparisons.

Effect size was based on the mean, SD and sample size of the intervention and control groups for each comparison. For the meta-analyses that compiled different scales, effect size was calculated as the standardized mean difference (SMD = Cohen d) with its 95% confidence interval (95%CI). This approach enabled inclusion of different outcome measures in the same synthesis.

Random effects model meta-analyses were conducted for all studies that had full data assessing mental health in general, and a sub-analysis was carried out for anxiety. A p-value o 0.05 was adopted as significant and heterogeneity was determined using I 2 . Figure 1 summarizes the steps of the systematic review. We found 2,825 articles through database searching: 877 from PubMed, 1,562 from EMBASE, and 386 from Psyc INFO. No other studies were found in additional databases (i.e., medRxiv, bioRxiv, PsyArXiv). After excluding duplicates, a total of 2,070 articles remained for the first screening. From those, 13 were automatically excluded due to the lack of title. From 2,057 references screened, 154 were accepted for full-text reading. After full-text reading, 29 additional articles were excluded, leaving a total of 125 articles that were included in the final analysis. Of these, four were RCTs. [31] [32] [33] [34] However, only three were included in the metaanalysis, 32-34 because one provided only absolute numbers and percentages rather than means and standard deviation. 31 Descriptive analysis of the articles included in the systematic review A total of 125 articles published from 2003 (first article) to 2020 regarding mental health interventions for COVID-19 and other coronaviruses (SARS and MERS) were found. Table 1 summarizes our results. More than 90% of the articles were published in 2020 and were about COVID-19, while the remaining minority included SARS-CoV-1 (6.4%), MERS (0.8%), and more than one coronavirus (0.8%). The majority of studies were conducted in China (28.8%), the United States (14.4%), and the United Kingdom (12%), followed by Italy (5.6%), India (4.8%), and Australia (3.2%). Most of these publications were letters to the editors (33.6%) and review articles (28%), followed by original research articles, largely cross-sectional in design (9.6%). The remaining articles (28.8%) included editorials, reports, experimental studies, cohort studies, consensus statements, meta-analyses, opinion, and quasi-experimental studies. Almost 70% included recommendations for the lay public and 20.8% for health care professionals. Table 2 summarizes the descriptive analysis of the 125 articles addressing preventive or interventional strategies for mental health symptoms in individuals during coronavirus pandemics. Recommendations regarding any kind of preventive and/or management interventions were made by 86.4 and 58.4% of all included articles respectively. More than one intervention was proposed in 69.6% of these articles, with 21.6% proposing more than five different interventions. The most common combined interventions were psychological and psychiatric (12.8%), technology and media (7.2%), and the combination of both (6.4%). Regarding each intervention, psychiatric and psychological were the most frequently reported, followed by self-care and educational interventions.

For the meta-analysis, three RCTs were included, 32-34 for a total of 128 participants. The meta-analysis revealed improved mental health in intervention groups as compared to control groups for a combination of outcomes analyzed together (improved anxiety, 32-34 depressive symptoms, 33, 34 sleep quality, 32 hostility, 33 Moreover, a quality assessment of clinical trials was carried out for the three included articles (Table 3 ). In general, the articles were of low quality, with a general score ranging from 3 to 7 (Table 1 ).

The first clinical trial was a 2006 study of a 1-day group debriefing technique, Strength-Focused and Meaning-Oriented Approach for Resilience and Transformation (SMART), based on Asian philosophies and traditional Chinese medicine 33 applied for people with chronic diseases 1 month after the SARS pandemic. The authors found that the intervention group reported improved depressive symptoms, but no difference was detected in anxiety, hostility, and somatization symptoms. Two other intervention studies were administered to patients with COVID-19. Liu et al. 32 evaluated the effects of progressive muscle relaxation, 30 min daily for 5 days, for patients with COVID-19 in an isolation ward. Subjects who received the intervention improved significantly in anxiety and sleep quality measures. Another Chinese group investigated the impact of an internet-based intervention for depressive and anxiety symptoms in COVID-19 patients. 34 This 2-week trial consisted of daily 50-minute practices of breath relaxation techniques, mindfulness, ''refuge skill,'' and a ''butterfly hug.'' The authors found a significant improvement in mild depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms after the 1st and 2nd weeks of the intervention. 39, [41] [42] [43] 48, 49, 52, 55, 57, 59, 72, 74, 87, 96, 121, 122, 124, 132, 133, [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] 146, 147 26 (20.8) General population and health care workers 40, 77, 82, 83, 99, 113, 115, 123, 129, 134 10 ( 

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically evaluate interventions designed to improve mental health outcomes during and after coronaviruses infections. In the meta-analysis, interventions were effective in improving the general mental health outcomes (anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep problems, hostility, and somatization) of individuals, but only when aggregated. When analyzing interventions for impact specifically on anxiety symptoms, the results were not significant. Concerning the descriptive systematic review, we found a large body of scientific literature proposing mental health interventions, mostly based on low-quality levels of evidence (i.e., expert opinions or cross-sectional studies). Most articles were from China and the United States and focused on the novel SARS-CoV-2 infection. Below, we will discuss the most important findings from these studies for each intervention group, as well as propose future interventions for mental health practitioners, general clinicians, educators, and governmental leaders.

Psychiatric and psychological interventions were, by far, the most common strategies recommended. Most recommendations were aimed at preventing the development of PTSD, [154] [155] [156] given the increased risk of PTSD reported in other coronaviruses 6 and the H1N1 epidemic. 157 Notably, most experts recommended individual psychotherapies, 55, 87 but also stressed the importance of hotlines 24, 158 and peer support groups. 59, 148 Certain individual interventions have more evidence for people facing acute stress, 159, 160 such as Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral 

Social and economic support 12,25,64,67,76,88,90,92,96,99,103,117,119,127,133,135,148,150,151 19 (15. 2) Increased mental health services 12, 25, 41, 43, 53, 64, 65, 67, 76, 82, 92, 99, 107, 127, 136, 148, 152 17 ( Therapy 161 and Prolonged Exposure Therapy. 162, 163 Psychological First Aid (i.e., initial crisis interventions with the aim to stabilize survivors from disasters) is a subset of interventions that requires more investigation. Ng et al. 33 found a negative association of a debriefing technique with depressive symptoms 1 month after stress exposure. However, several other studies and expert consensus guidelines suggest that debriefing interventions following an acute stressor may be contraindicated, highlighting a greater risk of developing PTSD. 164 Early psychopharmacological interventions were also recommended in some articles. 127 While there is a lack of studies investigating pharmacological interventions specifically for acute stress, 160 it is important to underscore the importance of avoiding iatrogenic contributors. For example, several studies have pointed out an increase of PTSD symptoms following the use of benzodiazepines for acute stress. 165, 166 Thus, experts suggest that clinicians avoid using benzodiazepines to treat mild symptoms (e.g., mild anxiety, insomnia) of acute stress and adjustment disorders, 167 but more studies should be done to investigate these controversies.

Meditation, especially mindfulness, 34,46 yoga, 40,51 and breathing techniques, 34, 121 were the most recommended complementary practices. There is a large body of evidence of the positive effects of these practices in mental health. 168 Mindfulness meditation has been used and validated for acute stress situations, 169 including those related to COVID-19. 34 It has been shown to have an effect on mood and anxiety, inducing neurobiological changes, even after 8-week meditation programs. 170, 171 A recent systematic-review 172 did highlight possible adverse effects from meditation practices and meditation-based therapies, however, such as the emergence of depressive and anxiety symptoms, cognitive anomalies, and suicidal behavior. Based on these studies, we suggest that complementary and alternative practices (especially mindfulness) should be encouraged as a good and low-cost practice to alleviate and/or prevent mental health issues following traumatic periods/experiences. However, attention should be paid especially to moderate and severe cases, where these practices could be detrimental if not enhanced with specialized mental health care.

Engaging in self-care practices is essential in promoting positive mental health. Several authors have pointed out the importance of exercise, eating habits, leisure time, sleep hygiene, establishing a routine, reducing alcohol intake, and spending more time with family and friends. 25, 35 There is a large body of evidence that self-care behaviors can decrease the development of mental health issues and stimulate positive mental health in the general population, but also in in mental health practitioners. [173] [174] [175] Interestingly, two authors stressed the importance of altruistic behaviors in promoting mental health. 121, 133 Previous articles have shown a positive relationship between altruistic behaviors and mental health outcomes, 176 though a recent crosssectional study investigating the effect of altruism on mental health showed a negative relationship between high levels of altruism and negative affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. 177 This finding was corroborated by a large population-based study, 178 which can be explained due to the fact that highly altruistic people might engage less in self-care practices.

It is critical that institutions provide a safe and healthy environment in order to foster personal growth and positive mental health outcomes among health care workers. Several experts recommended the importance of protecting health care workers from exposures to coronavirus, providing adequate personal protective equipment, setting balanced shift rotations, creating a comfortable place to rest, providing housing when needed, and providing positive role models for personal growth. 74, 124, 129 We suggest that institutions and governments should pay attention to and stimulate self-care behaviors of their professionals in order to alleviate their distress and promote better mental health. Special attention should be paid to low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) countries, where health professionals have an extremely high workload and are underpaid. Considerations may include increasing wages, reducing workloads, and affording professionals time to engage in self-care activities. 20 

In the midst of the ''technology era'' in health care services, 179 many online programs have been utilized to 34 26 Braz J Psychiatry. 2021;43 (6) support mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and some of them may become standard practices once the pandemic ends. Telehealth services, 145 including online psychological crisis intervention, 142 telephone support services, 102 online mental health services, 95 television-based interventions, 31 smartphone-based e-consults, 71 and the use of social media for psychological interventions 57 are some examples of successful programs developed this year. Leveraging such technologies has the potential to increase access to mental health care, create mentorship between mental health specialists and general practitioners in distant communities, and facilitate dissemination of general mental health recommendations.

Despite the important benefits of technology with regards to mental wellness, there are also some potential downsides. In LMICs, as well as for low-income individuals from developed nations, the lack of access to internet may create larger social and economic disparities. The increased exposure to internet and social media has already been associated with mental health issues, including decline in subjective well-being 180 and increased depressive symptoms. 181 Interestingly, Bessiè re et al., 182 in a longitudinal study, found that using the internet for health purposes might be associated with increased depressive symptoms, while using it to communicate with family and friends might be associated with decreased symptoms of depression. The authors suggest that their results could be explained by an increase in rumination, unnecessary alarm, or over-attention to health problems. More studies are needed to explore the potential deleterious effects of telehealth and technology systems in psychiatric and psychological care. Mental health providers should be aware of these problems while evaluating individuals during pandemic situations.

The use of programs to educate laypersons and health care workers about stress management 137 and to disseminate reliable and scientifically updated information about the disease 63 might be an important strategy to reduce anxiety and increase self-confidence. Furthermore, the importance of maintaining online school and university classes and other web courses was also addressed by many experts 49, 141 and seems to be associated with a sense of well-being and accomplishment. However, some concerns emerge in low income countries and low-income areas of other countries, where citizens might face serious economic issues during critical periods, and might not have access to internet or electronic devices. 183 Governments should work to increase access to the internet in low income and vulnerable populations, and mental health professionals are encouraged to develop educational programs for these patients.

The negative mental health impact of economic crises 19, 184 and previous pandemic outbreaks 6 has already been studied by many authors. It is crucial that during crises, government, especially from LMICs, 64 lead initiatives to prevent and address mental health issues, including suicidal behavior, 12 that might arise from distressing situations. Several mental health experts pointed out the importance of governments in lending social and economic support to individuals, 119, 151 increasing mental health services, 53 and supporting victims of domestic violence. 25 During the COVID-19 pandemic, countries have developed many different economic interventions in order to ameliorate its impact on health. 185 More studies should be done to understand the exact impact of these initiatives in public health.

There is a growing body of evidence highlighting the positive role of spirituality and religiousness in mental health. 186, 187 However, few experts recommended spiritual or religious practices as a possible coping mechanism during any coronavirus epidemic. Notably, several groups around the world are developing strategies to deal with the growing spiritual struggle that people might face during a crisis, such as the development of hotlines focused in promoting spiritual care and fulfill the lack of religious support during quarantine. 158, 188 However, more empirical studies should be done in order to investigate the exact impact of these religious/spiritual intervention strategies in mental health. Moreover, mental health providers should be aware of the spiritual needs of their patients, identifying if the use of religiousness and spirituality is functional or dysfunctional, and referring to religious leaders or chaplains if appropriate.

Physical interventions, such as muscle relaxation techniques and yoga exercises, have also been reported by some experts as a tool to curtail anxiety and sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic. Liu et al. 32 found a positive effect on both anxiety and sleep quality for patients with COVID-19. This finding is consistent with a previous study that used the same technique with pregnant women 189 and breast cancer patients. 190 The underlying mechanism might be the balance between the anterior and hypothalamic nucleus and the reduction of sympathetic nervous system activity, 32 though further studies are needed.

Finally, several general recommendations with clinical tips for mental health practitioners were also published during the COVID-19 and other pandemics. 90, 93 Interestingly, many experts recommended the avoidance of the term ''social distancing,'' preferring ''physical distancing'' in order to reduce feelings of rejection among psychiatric patients. 90, 130 To our knowledge, no study has empirically investigated the effect of this recommendation in clinical practice.

This study has several limitations. First, we only included three databases, and articles published in other databases might not have been included. Second, our search strategy is limited to only few mental health issues, potentially limiting generalization. Third, most articles included had a low level of evidence, with a great number of letters to the editor, opinions, editorials, recommendations, and case reports. Forth, due to the dynamic and continuous process of publications during COVID-19 pandemic, new articles may have been published in the months after this review. Fifth, our meta-analysis included only three articles, which could limit our findings. More RCTs are needed in order to overcome this limitation. Finally, we found a high heterogeneity among RCTs, including different intervention populations, different types of interventions, and different outcome measures. Such heterogeneity may have impacted the findings and interpretation of our meta-analysis.

The present review found that there are few clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of interventions to improve the mental health of individuals during coronavirus pandemics. Although the results were superior for the intervention groups as compared to the control groups for general mental health, these results relied on only three studies with limited quality. When analyzing individual outcomes, such as anxiety, the pooled results were not significant. However, in the systematic review, we found a large body of expert recommendations that can help health practitioners, institutional and governmental leaders, and laypersons cope with mental health issues during a pandemic, as well as during periods of social and economic crises. Furthermore, despite the low level of evidence, many of these recommendations can be generalized to routine daily practice in order to improve mental health and wellbeing. This is essential given that in many countries, and especially in developing countries, citizens will face years of social and economic adversity that will have a direct impact on the mental health of populations.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Ursano RJ Textbook of disaster psychiatry

Covid-19: WHO declares pandemic because of ''alarming levels'' of spread, severity, and inaction

Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection

COVID-19 and mental health: a review of the existing literature

Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic

Are we facing a crashing wave of neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19? Neuropsychiatric symptoms and potential immunologic mechanisms

Encephalopathy and encephalitis associated with cerebrospinal fluid cytokine alterations and coronavirus disease

Neurological involvement in COVID-19 and potential mechanisms: a review

Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated anosmia

Psychophysical evaluation of chemosensory functions 5 weeks after olfactory loss due to COVID-19: a prospective cohort study on 72 patients

Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic

A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China

Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: role of inflammatory and clinical predictors

Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and other coronaviruses

Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for myocardial infarction, stroke and mortality: UK Biobank cohort study of 479 054 men and women

Life in the pandemic: social isolation and mental health

The association between social network factors and mental health at different life stages

Impact of economic crises on mental health care: a systematic review

Suicide risk and the economic crisis: an exploratory analysis of the case of Milan

The SARS-associated stigma of SARS victims in the post-SARS era of Hong Kong

Psychogeriatric Clinic HCFMUSP. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on mental health in the elderly: perspective from a psychogeriatric clinic at a tertiary hospital in São Paulo

Mental health treatment for front-line clinicians during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a plea to the medical community

How institutions can protect the mental health and psychosocial well-being of their healthcare workers in the current COVID-19 pandemic

The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physical distancing: the need for prevention and early intervention

Lessons learned from 9/11: mental health perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

PROSPERO. PROSPERO is fast-tracking registration of protocols related to COVID-19

A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality

Telehealth home support during COVID-19 confinement for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia: survey study

Effects of progressive muscle relaxation on anxiety and sleep quality in patients with COVID-19

Group debriefing for people with chronic diseases during the SARS pandemic: Strength-Focused and Meaning-Oriented Approach for Resilience and Transformation (SMART)

Efficacy of internet-based integrated intervention on depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with COVID-19

Addressing mental health needs: an integral part of COVID-19 response

Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: health system and community response to a text message (Text4Hope) program supporting mental health in Alberta

Psychological interventions for COVID-19 outbreak in Mazandaran province

Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated psychological problems

Buddies: rapid deployment of a psychological resilience intervention for health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Dealing with sleep problems during home confinement due to the COVID-19 outbreak: practical recommendations from a task force of the european cbt-i academy

The COVID-19 emergency response should include a mental health component

Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of surgeons and coping strategies

2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society

An e-mental health intervention to support burdened people in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: CoPE It

Psychological support in times of COVID-19: the Essen community-based CoPE concept

The benefits of meditation and mindfulness practices during times of crisis such as COVID-19

Role of electronic media in mitigating the psychological impacts of novel coronavirus (COVID-19)

Supporting hospital staff during COVID-19: Early Interventions

Mitigating the psychological impact of covid-19 on healthcare workers: a digital learning package

Art therapy in the time of COVID-19

#SendHelpNow: mental wellness and virtual connection in the age of coronavirus

Psychological impact and coping strategies of frontline medical staff in hunan between

Community mental health care in the COVID-19 response: an Italian example

Treating the mental health effects of COVID-19: The need for at-home neurotherapeutics is now

Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak

An online solution focused brief therapy for adolescent anxiety during the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Covid-19 epidemic peer support and crisis intervention via social media

Narrative synthesis of psychological and coping responses towards emerging infectious disease outbreaks in the general population: practical considerations for the COVID-19 pandemic

Adapting IAPT services to support frontline NHS staff during the Covid-19 pandemic: the Homerton Covid Psychological Support (HCPS) pathway

Keep socially (but not physically) connected and carry on: preventing suicide in the age of COVID-19

Protecting the psychological health of children through effective communication about COVID-19

Mental health in the coronavirus disease 2019 emergency-the Italian response

Psychological interventions during COVID-19: challenges for low and middle income countries

Psychological resources against the traumatic experience of COVID-19

Seven tips to manage your mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 outbreak

Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic

Opening up while locking down: how an Irish independent sector mental health service is responding to the COVID-19 crisis Ir

Qigong for the prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation of COVID-19 infection in older adults

How to manage obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) under COVID-19: a clinician's guide from the International College of Obsessive Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (ICOCS) and the Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders Research Network (OCRN) of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology

A smartphone based e-consult in addiction medicine: an initiative in COVID lockdown

Caring for the psychological well-being of healthcare professionals in the Covid-19 pandemic crisis

How might the NHS protect the mental health of health-care workers after the COVID-19 crisis?

Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic

COVID 19: Impact of lock-down on mental health and tips to overcome

Mental health strategies to combat the psychological impact of COVID-19 beyond paranoia and panic

Emergency management of mental hospitals during the outbreak of COVID-19

Mental health treatment online during the COVID-19 outbreak

Care for the psychological status of frontline medical staff fighting against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Dialectical behavior therapy-based psychological intervention for woman in late pregnancy and early postpartum suffering from COVID-19: a case report

Online mental health services in Indonesia during the COVID-19 outbreak

Psychological intervention and COVID-19: what we know so far and what we can do

Psychological crisis intervention during the outbreak period of new coronavirus pneumonia from experience in Shanghai

Mental health and psychological intervention amid COVID-19 outbreak: perspectives from South Korea

Addressing international student mental health during COVID-19: an imperative overdue

Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance

Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis

Suicide prevention during the COVID-19 outbreak

COVID-19 and prisons: providing mental health care for people in prison, minimising moral injury and psychological distress in mental health staff

Principles of mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic

Providing quality end-of-life care to older people in the era of COVID-19: perspectives from five countries

Mental healthcare for psychiatric inpatients during the COVID-19 epidemic

Progression of mental health services during the COVID-19 outbreak in China

How I faced my coronavirus anxiety

Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak

Covid-19: supporting nurses' psychological and mental health

Addressing psychosocial problems associated with the COVID-19 lockdown

Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: time to optimize the potential of telepsychiatric aftercare clinic to ensure the continuity of care

The COVID-19 outbreak: the latest challenge to psychological and psychiatric intervention

Mindoljevic Drakulic A. The importance of psychodynamic approach during COVID-19 pandemic

Three steps to flatten the mental health need curve amid the COVID-19 pandemic

Implementation and analysis of a telephone support service during COVID-19

Preventing suicide in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Adapting mental health care after the COVID-19 outbreak: Preliminary findings from a public general hospital in Madrid (Spain)

Optimizing psychiatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic

Assessing the anxiety level of Iranian general population during COVID-19 outbreak

Preventing suicide in rural communities during the COVID-19 pandemic

Cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder via telehealth: practical considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mental health and psychosocial aspects of Coronavirus outbreak in Pakistan: psychological intervention for public mental health crisis

People with suspected COVID-19 symptoms were more likely depressed and had lower health-related quality of life: the potential benefit of health literacy

The need for early intervention for psychosis to persist throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

Psychological intervention measures during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mental health care measures in response to the 2019 novel Coronavirus outbreak in Korea

Empowering global mental health in the time of Covid19

Mental health issues and psychological crisis interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic and earthquakes in Croatia

Mental health services in Lombardy during COVID-19 outbreak

Ultra brief psychological interventions for COVID-19 pandemic: introduction of a locally-adapted brief intervention for mental health and psychosocial support service

Mental health interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a conceptual framework by early career psychiatrists

Psychological intervention on COVID-19: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Burnout and posttraumatic stress disorder in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: intersection, impact, and interventions

Preventing psychological injury during the COVID-19 pandemic

Preserving mental health and resilience in frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19

Understanding and addressing sources of anxiety among health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic

What can we do for people exposed to multiple traumatic events during the coronavirus pandemic?

Psychological crisis intervention for college students during novel coronavirus infection epidemic

Addressing mental health care for the bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic

Philippine teachers' practices to deal with anxiety amid COVID-19

What should be done to support the mental health of healthcare staff treating COVID-19 patients?

The term 'physical distancing' is recommended rather than 'social distancing' during the COVID-19 pandemic for reducing feelings of rejection among people with mental health problems

WARA (wiring affect with reattach) provided by remote training: first-aid psychological intervention? Clin Neuropsychiatry

Analysis of psychological and sleep status and exercise rehabilitation of front-line clinical staff in the fight against COVID-19 in China

Mitigating the psychological effects of COVID-19 on health care workers

The COVID-19 outbreak and psychiatric hospitals in China: managing challenges through mental health service reform

The effects of social support on sleep quality of medical staff treating patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in January and February 2020 in China

Characteristics and challenges of psychological first aid in China during the COVID-19 outbreak

Urgent need to develop evidence-based self-help interventions for mental health of healthcare workers in COVID-19 pandemic

Posttraumatic stress symptoms of health care workers during the corona virus disease

COVID-19 pandemic as a watershed moment: a call for systematic psychological health care for frontline medical staff

Mental health care for international Chinese students affected by the COVID-19 outbreak

Addressing collegiate mental health amid COVID-19 pandemic

Recommended psychological crisis intervention response to the 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia outbreak in China: a model of West China Hospital

Mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemics and the mitigation effects of exercise: a longitudinal study of college students in China

Psychological crisis interventions in Sichuan Province during the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak

The role of telehealth in reducing the mental health burden from COVID-19

Psychological impact of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on health care workers in a medium size regional general hospital in Singapore

Effects of a SARS prevention programme in Taiwan on nursing staff's anxiety, depression and sleep quality: a longitudinal survey

Psychological intervention with sufferers from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): lessons learnt from empirical findings

Delivering psychiatric care for patients recovering from massive infectious disease outbreak -moving on from SARS to Post-SARS Era

Social support and psychological adjustment to SARS: the mediating role of self-care self-efficacy

Relation between social support and mental health of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome

System effectiveness of detection, brief intervention and refer to treatment for the people with post-traumatic emotional distress by MERS: a case report of community-based proactive intervention in South Korea

Psychological crisis intervention model in Xiaotangshan Hospital of PLA

Acute stress disorder as a predictor of posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review

An evidence-based review of early intervention and prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder. Community

PTSD as the second tsunami of the SARS-Cov2 pandemic

Predictors of symptoms of posttraumatic stress in Chinese university students during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic

The role of spirituality in the COVID-19 pandemic: a spiritual hotline project

Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder

The current evidence for acute stress disorder

Trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy for traumatized children and families

Early intervention may prevent the development of posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized pilot civilian study with modified prolonged exposure

Prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder by early treatment: results from the Jerusalem trauma outreach and prevention study

Psychological debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev

Hypnotic medication in the aftermath of trauma

Treatment of recent trauma survivors with benzodiazepines: a prospective study

Benzodiazepines for PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic review of the efficacy of meditation techniques as treatments for medical illness

The effect of mindfulness meditation training on biological acute stress responses in generalized anxiety disorder

8-week mindfulness based stress reduction induces brain changes similar to traditional long-term meditation practice -a systematic review

Effects of an 8-week meditation program on mood and anxiety in patients with memory loss

Adverse events in meditation practices and meditation-based therapies: a systematic review

Dear mental health practitioners, take care of yourselves: a literature review on self-care

Selfcare in mental health services: a narrative review

Exercise and the prevention of depression: results of the HUNT cohort study

Altruistic social interest behaviors are associated with better mental health

When altruists cannot help: the influence of altruism on the mental health of university students during the COVID-19 pandemic

The role of altruistic behavior in generalized anxiety disorder and major depression among adults in the United States

Telehealth in the context of COVID-19: changing perspectives in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States

Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults

Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students

Effects of internet use on health and depression: a longitudinal study

The social, economic and sanitary impact of COVID-19 pandemic

Mental health outcomes in times of economic recession: a systematic literature review

Economic interventions to ameliorate the impact of COVID-19 on the economy and health: an international comparison

Clinical implications of spirituality to mental health: review of evidence and practical guidelines

Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: a review

ChurchInAction: the role of religious interventions in times of COVID-19

Efficacy of progressive muscle relaxation on pregnancy outcome among anxious Indian primi mothers

Effects of progressive muscle relaxation and mindfulness meditation on fatigue, coping styles, and quality of life in early breast cancer patients: an assessor blinded, three-arm, randomized controlled trial