key: cord-1038373-ngb6gjz7 authors: Hoffmann, Marc S title: Towards better understanding of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients date: 2020-10-09 journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa091 sha: fa384c48ea4d3cf298c7aea60b0b514fdc1bc63f doc_id: 1038373 cord_uid: ngb6gjz7 nan Keeping up with how COVID-19 should influence patient care challenges practicing hematologists and oncologists who routinely treat cancer patients. Many cancers unfortunately have an aggressive natural history that mandates therapeutic intervention on an urgent basis and does not afford us the luxury of postponing therapy while awaiting the end of a pandemic. As a consequence, our community was left with difficult decisions regarding how to care for our patients with a compelling risk of death from malignancy in the midst of a deadly infection whose biology was not fully understood. As the initial data emerged from China in February and March 2020 it appeared that cancer patients were not only more susceptible to infection (1) but also had worse outcomes (2) . In fact, the initial reports from Liang et al (2) suggested that the risk of severe COVID-19 infection, a composite outcome of death or intensive care unit (ICU) admission requiring mechanical ventilation, was 39% in cancer patients compared to 8% in patients without cancer. While these initial reports were plagued by small sample sizes (n=18 in Liang study (2) ) the data were compelling enough for many cancer centers to take added precaution with cancer patients. A comprehensive report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology released May 19, 2020 recommended a wide battery of precautions for cancer patients, including physical distancing measures such as limiting entry points, temperature screening stations, universal PPE, and, importantly, testing of cancer patients prior to receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy (3). provides an important addition to our data set on cancer patients and offers a distinctly different view of how COVID-19 may affect cancer patients (4) . The data comprise the largest longitudinally collected database from a single institution to date, with nearly 10,000 patients followed from March 1 through May 1 at the Institut Curie in Paris. Importantly, these data include both inpatients and outpatients, patients on active therapy and under surveillance, and utilized a strict definition of PCR test and characteristic CT findings to establish confirmed cases. The population included a predominance of breast cancer (approximately 40% of the total cohort) in keeping with the overall institutional case mix. Their results paint quite a different picture of COVID-19 risk among cancer patients. Not only was the overall incidence low (1.4%), it was comparable or potentially lower than that seen in the French population at the time. Perhaps more strikingly, the mortality reported (19%) was identical to that seen in the French population at the time (20%). Finally, and this is likely the most important conclusion of the analysis, the risk of death or ICU admission from COVID-19 on multivariate analysis was independent of cancer risk factors and wholly dependent on parameters of infection severity, namely presenting oxygen saturation and extent of lung involvement on CT. Regardless of how one wishes to point out limitations, this report clearly is very good news for cancer patients and suggests that their cancer diagnosis may not be as substantial a risk factor for severe COVID-19 infection as initially thought. Importantly, these results are in keeping with the prospective cohort of cancer patients in the UK (5) . In that analysis, mortality was similar between cancer and non-cancer patients and disease specific risk factors predicted mortality rather than cancer specific risk factors, with advanced age conferring a nearly 10-fold risk (5) . These two studies offer a more complete and comprehensive view of how COVID-19 affects cancer patients. So how should one incorporate this into clinical practice? First, it would be a mistake to conclude that aggressive infection control measures are no longer necessary. It is clearly in the best interest of our patients and society at large to limit COVID-19 infections as much as possible. Second, these studies are underrepresented for severely immunocompromised patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing intensive lymphodepleting chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. These patients have more severe manifestations of community-acquired respiratory virus infections in general and tend to shed virus and remain infectious for longer periods of time (6) . Extreme vigilance in the population clearly remains warranted. Third, these data can be helpful to alleviate anxiety and concern among our patients. While the message clearly should not be to let their guard down, many cancer patients are already imprisoned by anxiety surrounding their cancer diagnosis. The social isolation and fear of death from COVID-19 infection compounds this anxiety. These data offer some hope to them that a COVID-19 diagnosis is not a death sentence. Finally, recommendations to test prior to delivery of lymphodepleting chemotherapy should remain in place. There is ample data that lymphopenia is associated with more severe COVID-19 infection (7) and, while this is causative and not a clear association, it is hard to imagine that lymphodepleting chemotherapy would be anything but possibly deleterious. The last word of caution is that one must be careful regarding each individual cancer drug and possible effects on COVID-19 infection severity. Many of us read with pleasure the report from Treon et al showing possible protective effect of ibrutinib against severe COVID-19 infection (8) . It is incumbent on the practicing oncologist to ensure understanding of how our drugs may affect COVID-19 prognosis, favorably or unfavorably, and counsel and test patients appropriately. Disclosures: The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose. SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Patients With Cancer at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Wuhan, China Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China ASCO Special Report: A Guide to Delivery of Cancer Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic Characteristics and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer on chemotherapy or other anti-cancer treatments: a prospective cohort study Respiratory Virus Infections in Hematopoetic Cell Transplant Recipients Lymphopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A systemic review and meta-analysis The BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib may protect against pulmonary injury in COVID-19 infected patients