key: cord-1033760-gw3jmalz
authors: Boreskie, Kevin F.; Boreskie, Patrick E.; Melady, Don
title: Age is just a number – and so is frailty: Strategies to inform resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic
date: 2020-04-01
journal: CJEM
DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.358
sha: 132d1b816cee6d18c9b187abea847143644c6dde
doc_id: 1033760
cord_uid: gw3jmalz

nan

only consideration, these recommendations seem to propagate the misguided notion that being elderly and being frail are synonymous. We speculate that the decision was based on an observation that patients presenting with comorbidities, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and immunocompromising conditions, have higher COVID-19 mortality. 2 However, the correlation between polymorbidity and age is far from perfect, due to the heterogeneity of aging. 3 As this pandemic develops, emergency physicians must be familiar with a more global approach to the assessment of patients' physiologic resilience and chance of benefit with intensive care. This approach may seem more philosophical than practical in this crisis, but it can be an efficient tool to guide equitable resource allocation. This may put us closer to "getting it right" with medical care that makes a difference and maximizes benefit. 4 Faced with fewer ICU beds per capita, physicians in the United Kingdom (UK) have been challenged with the same difficult resource allocation decisions as Italy. The proposed method of triage published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom takes a slightly different approach. Instead of making decisions based on chronological age, the NICE COVID-19 Rapid Guideline:

Critical Care proposes screening based on frailty for decisions regarding level of care. 5 Frailty is characterized by widespread physiological declines across many systems that can leave a person more susceptible to health stressors, such as infection. 6 Frail individuals are also more likely to present with a variety of comorbidities that each contribute to poor outcomes. While frailty is often associated with older age, purely age-based criteria are frequently inaccurate, as younger people can also present with frailty, and many older people are healthy and robust. 7 Assessing frailty is already an unconscious part of an emergency physician's assessment of patients, but can be done in a more structured and evidence-based way.

There are many methods of assessing frailty and no one method is universally accepted. Strategies for identifying frailty are often based on a balance between efficacy and feasibility in a specific setting. The COVID-19 guideline presented by NICE proposes the use of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). 8 The CFS, developed by Canadian geriatrician Kenneth Rockwood, is a simple one-page "frailty cheat sheet," which provides nine pictograms and brief descriptions to place patients on a scale from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill). Patient placement on this scale is based on evaluation by an experienced clinician using a summary assessment of health and recent function to estimate their level of frailty or robustness. This tool has been validated and successfully used in multiple settings, including those where more extensive testing is not feasible. 9 It is a rapid and ED-friendly method already used in every National Health Service (NHS) ED in the United Kingdom, and seems practical to use in the context of COVID-19 patients presenting to an overwhelmed hospital (Figure 1 ).

Most clinicians are aware that over the next few weeks, difficult decisions will need to be made around access to care for all patients, especially for those at greater risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. The NICE COVID-19 guidelines could be used to provide a sensible decision support tool that integrates sound geriatric While the NICE tool is specifically intended for use after the decision to admit, we suggest it could be modified to inform the decision of whether to admit, or even for prehospital disposition decisions regarding different levels of health center if frailty category was already known. These are hard decisions, which sometimes have been deferred to "others" (internists, intensivists, palliative care) but may soon be an ED decision as the demand on limited health care resources increases. Considering the Canadian context lacks the UK's NHS "4-hour standard" for admission decision, it can be assumed that many of the clinical decision points described in the NICE pathway may occur while under the care of emergency physicians.

As COVID-19 case incidence increases, Canada may be forced to make the tough decisions that other countries have already had to face, as anticipated numbers of patients presenting in critical condition will exceed the supply of available beds and ventilators. Faced with this difficulty, Canadian physicians may consider using frailty assessments as a means of improving care in this pandemic scenario. Research should prioritize studying outcomes of older patients and frail patients with COVID-19 to better characterize these populations and inform decision-making. In these uncertain times, we need to realize that it is likely not age, but rather frailty, that best contributes to outcome prediction. After all, the more encouraging interpretation of the

Facing Covid-19 in Italy -ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic's front line

Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy

Heterogeneity of human aging and its assessment

Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19

Overview | COVID-19 rapid guideline: critical care | Guidance | NICE [Internet]. NICE

Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype

Prevalence of frailty in Canadians 18-79 years old in the Canadian Health Measures Survey

A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people

Which frailty scale for patients admitted via emergency department? A cohort study

Demographic science aids in understanding the spread and fatality rates of COVID-19