key: cord-1029385-zqu8uwkm
authors: Lamplot, Joseph D.; Pinnamaneni, Sridhar; Swensen-Buza, Stephanie; Lawton, Cort D.; Dines, Joshua S.; Nawabi, Danyal H.; Young, Warren K.; Rodeo, Scott A.; Taylor, Samuel A.
title: The Knee Examination for Video Telemedicine Encounters
date: 2021-02-21
journal: HSS J
DOI: 10.1177/1556331620975039
sha: 2ea622e11182c63dfa66e53e1cb458c421412e7e
doc_id: 1029385
cord_uid: zqu8uwkm

nan

Although over the past 2 decades improvements in audio visual communication technologies have led to an increased use of telemedicine across many health care disciplines [1, 27] , it had not been widely adopted in orthopedic surgery and other musculoskeletal specialties within the United States until the onset of the COVID19 pandemic [19] . However, mandated social distancing measures and restric tions on inperson consultations have forced both clinicians and patients to become familiar with webbased videocon ferencing platforms for care delivery. To continue providing musculoskeletal care during the pandemic, there has been a dramatic increase in telemedicine visits [2, 20] . Previous studies on telemedicine have shown that these visits increase access to care while having lower overall costs and main taining patient satisfaction [5, 9] . With increased access to highspeed videoconferencing platforms, widely available personal computing devices, and patient demand for high quality, convenient, efficient specialty care, telemedicine is an effective medium for musculoskeletal care that will endure beyond the COVID19 pandemic [2, 19, 20, 22, 24, 28] . One particular challenge to the longterm adoption of tele medicine in musculoskeletal specialties has been a widely held perception that remote visits are markedly limited by the inability to perform an inperson physical examination [3, 12, 13, 29, 30] . In particular, it has been thought that examination maneuvers requiring manual motor testing for strength, motion assessment, stability, and provocative testing for pain may be difficult to perform remotely [20] . However, in a randomized controlled trial of orthopedic vis its in which telemedicine encounters were compared with in person consultations, physicians rated their ability to examine patients as good or very good in 98% of telehealth visits, with no significant differences between groups and no adverse safety events [4] . When specifically considering the physical examination of the knee, closer review suggests that most of the examination can actually be successfully per formed remotely with some modifications.

The purpose of this commentary is to describe a compre hensive knee physical examination for video telemedicine encounters, including (1) verbal instructions in layman's terms of each examination maneuver, (2) annotated images of each examination maneuver that can be provided to patients via screen share options, and (3) checklists for documentation.

In our experience, before the scheduled encounter, the patient must be provided with information that allows them to become familiar with the specific Internet videoconferencing platform that is being used (eg, Zoom, Skype, and Teams) and should be encouraged to test and verify that their Internet connectivity, video quality, and audio systems are functional for the upcoming virtual visit. Most of these videoconfer encing platforms allow for testing each of these parameters prior to a meeting, or in this case, a telemedicine encounter.

In addition, prior to the virtual visit, we encourage the patient to complete an intake form containing questions about their chief complaint, history of present illness, past medical and surgical history, allergies, home medications, social history, and a complete review of systems. In addition to the virtual examination and medical decisionmaking, several of these aforementioned intake items must be collected and docu mented to appropriately bill for the visit. The patient should also review instructions on how to set up their camera to adequately visualize the knee. At the start of the visit, the patient should be seated with their camera centered at their eye level. During the physical examination, the patient will be asked to reposition themselves based on the specific examination maneuver being performed. The required dis tance and angle of the camera position will vary by the type of camera and the patient position. Finally, the patient should be dressed in appropriate clothing for the virtual visit. We provide the schematic shown in Fig. 1 to patients who are being seen for a knee complaint. This schematic contains guidelines for appropriate clothing, examination space, patient positioning, camera positioning, and any required common household items. In some cases, even when all the aforementioned information has been provided to the patient ahead of the visit, issues can arise with them connecting to the videoconferencing platform. First, we recommend that a member of the provider's office staff calls the patient and attempts to guide them through these issues. However, it is essential that support from information technology is avail able for troubleshooting any technical difficulties that cannot be resolved by the provider's office staff.

We have divided the knee examination into a basic examina tion (core knee examination) and pathologyspecific special testing [17] . The basic examination includes inspection, palpation, range of motion testing, motor testing, sensory testing, and a peripheral vascular examination [3] . Patients with undifferentiated lower extremity pain with or without low back pain should be assessed for a neurologic etiology. (The lumbar spine examination is covered in a separate arti cle in this special issue of the HSS Journal.) Hip or periph eral vascular pathology should also be considered when the pain is difficult for the patient to localize. An assessment for hip pain and restricted motion should be performed on nearly every patient with a complaint of knee pain. (The hip Core knee examination. The patient should be asked to posi tion themselves so that their camera will be able to visualize the front, sides, and back of the knee as they turn their body toward the camera during a thorough inspection. This inspec tion of the bilateral lower extremities should evaluate for coronal and sagittal alignment, muscle atrophy, deformity, prior incisions, scars, effusion, soft tissue swelling, ecchy mosis, erythema, skin lesions, or rashes. Gait should be assessed. The patient may be asked to identify the location of maximal pain by pointing to that area and selfpalpating. Bilateral range of motion testing should be performed. A virtual goniometer may be used for the evaluation of both alignment and range of motion [7, 28] . While bilateral sen sory testing and a peripheral vascular examination can be performed by the patient, strength testing requires a remote examiner, such as a family member (Supplemental Table 1 [available online]).

Special testing. Pathologyspecific special testing can be categorized into ligament tests, meniscal tests, and patello femoral joint tests.

Ligament testing. Previous studies have shown that, when performed by an experienced examiner, the lever test is actu ally more sensitive than other tests, including the Lachman test, for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury [3, 18] . As originally described, the examiner presses down on the distal third of the patient's quadriceps with 1 hand, while the other hand is positioned as a fist beneath the proximal third of the patient's calf [14] . A positive test results in an objective and visual finding-the patient's heel will not raise off the table; it does not rely on subjective determina tion like the Lachman and anterior drawer tests. We have modified this examination to be performed by the patient independently, with a soup or vegetable can placed beneath the calf, and the patient pressing down on their distal quad riceps muscle. To evaluate for posterior cruciate ligament injury, the posterior sag test [25] and the quadriceps active test [3, 6, 25] can be performed by the patient independently. Both of these tests should be performed while the patient is supine and the camera is pointed toward the side of the knee (Supplemental Table 2 ).

Meniscus testing. We have modified the common tests used to assess for meniscal pathology to be performed by the patient independently, including the bounce test and the hyperflexion test [3, 21] . As it was originally described, the Thessaly test can be performed by the patient independently while directly facing the camera (Supplemental Table 3 ) [3, 8, 10] .

Patellofemoral joint testing. The "Jsign" indicates patellar maltracking and may be observed with the patient facing the camera in a seated position and actively moving their knee back and forth through a range of motion from flexion into extension [3, 21, 23, 26] . Patellofemoral crepitus can similarly be detected by the patient by placing 1 of their hands over the patella while actively moving the affected knee back and forth from flexion into extension. Crepitus may be enhanced by knee extension against resistance, and the patient can be encouraged to do this with the help of a family member. We have modified the patellar apprehension test to be performed entirely by the patient in a seated position with the ankle of the affected extremity crossed over the unaffected leg and a laterally directed force placed on the patella using both thumbs [3, 21] . A singleleg squat performed with the patient directly facing the camera can demonstrate valgus and inter nal rotation collapse that may suggest a correctible neuro muscular imbalance or hip pathology which can contribute to anterior knee pain (Supplemental Table 4 ) [11] .

The maneuvers that comprise the Beighton score (knee and elbow recurvatum, thumb to forearm apposition, and lumbar flexion) can be performed independently by the patient to evaluate for generalized joint hypermobility (Supplemental Table 5 ) [15] .

The tools provided here offer a comprehensive, standardized approach to the virtual knee examination including office workflow, previsit setup, and physical examination testing. Similar to an inperson new patient consultation, we recom mend that the virtual knee physical examination starts with the core knee examination followed by additional pathology specific special testing as clinically appropriate. The specific special tests performed should be directed by the patient's history of present illness and findings on the core knee examination. The time required to perform an examination can vary based on a variety of factors, but in our experience, the core knee examination as listed requires approximately 5 minutes and a problemfocused examination generally approximately 5 to 10 minutes to complete. Efficiency can be optimized by choosing a sequence of examination maneu vers that minimizes the number of times the patient is asked to move between standing, sitting, and supine positions. Improved standardization of these modified virtual examina tion tests will result in improved reliability and validity of the virtual examination.

An inoffice examination performed by an experienced cli nician undoubtedly offers a more comprehensive musculo skeletal evaluation compared with a virtual examination including focused palpation in areas consistent with patient's history, tactile recognition of crepitus, accurate strength assessment, and assessment of ligament integrity. At this point, it is impossible to replace the ability of an experienced clinician to perform certain physical examination maneuvers such as the Lachman and pivot shift examinations for ACL injury. In addition to knee ligament assessment, we have found that remote assessment of patellar instability also gen erally provides more limited diagnostic information com pared with an inperson examination. When patients present with a history suggestive of these conditions, we typically perform a virtual physical examination during the initial con sultation but have a low threshold to obtain advanced imag ing (typically in the form of a magnetic resonance imaging) which may be followed by a subsequent inperson visit for examination. However, by including alternatives such as the lever test for ACL integrity [3, 18] and our modification of patellar apprehension testing, we can still obtain useful data that allow for reasonable clinical decisionmaking. Although we provide our best recommendations regarding optimal positioning of the patient and camera for each examination maneuver, videoconferencing may prevent clinicians from interpreting certain tests with the same accuracy as an in person examination. A specific example of this is a subtle knee flexion contracture or effusion that is more easily appreciated in person than via videoconferencing. While we attempted to modify as many tests as possible to be per formed independently by the patient, certain tests do require a remote examiner. Such tests are often performed by some one who is not trained in performing the musculoskeletal examination, and it is possible that findings may be incor rectly interpreted or reported by the examiner or patient, despite uniform instructions. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the tests that we have included when performed by a patient or by an untrained remote examiner and interpreted by a clinician have yet to be defined but are likely lower than published values for the same tests when they are performed by an experienced examiner in person. It is critical that treatment plans only be formulated when find ings of the virtual physical examination corroborate the patient's history and imaging studies. Conflicting findings must prompt an inperson evaluation prior to clinical deci sionmaking [16] .

The COVID19 crisis has forced our society to become increasingly facile with videobased communication plat forms. Orthopedists and other providers of musculoskeletal care have found that virtual physical examinations can be performed in a similar manner to inoffice visits, albeit with some inherent limitations [22] . Various modifications of physical examination maneuvers, including for evaluation of the knee, have helped to overcome some of these limitations and allow for a more comprehensive virtual examination. Due in part to high patient and clinician satisfaction, health care savings, improved access to care, and improved time efficiency, we believe that telemedicine in orthopedics will endure beyond the resolution of the current COVID19 cri sis. Future studies will seek to validate the virtual knee examination maneuvers presented here.

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Joshua S. Dines, MD, reports relationships with Arthrex Inc, Thieme Inc, Linvatec, Wolters Kluwer Health, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, outside the submitted work. Scott A. Rodeo, MD, reports relationships with Advance Medical and Ortho RTI, outside the submitted work. Samuel A. Taylor, MD, reports relationships with DJO Orthopedics and Mitek, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, author ship, and/or publication of this article.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article as supplemental material.

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Please go to HSS eAcademy at https://bit.ly/HSSJCME to find all journalrelated CME, complete the online posttest, and claim CME credit.

Telemedicine technology: a review of ser vices, equipment, and other aspects

Transforming the orthopaedic patient experience through tele medicine

Physical examination of the knee: meniscus, cartilage, and patellofemoral conditions

Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial

Introduction to the practice of tele medicine

Use of the quad riceps active test to diagnose posterior cruciateligament disruption and measure posterior laxity of the knee

Reliability of a smart phonebased goniometer for knee joint goniometry

Validity of the Thessaly test in evaluating meniscal tears compared with arthroscopy: a diagnostic accuracy study

Factors determining the success and failure of eHealth interventions: systematic review of the literature

The Thessaly test for detection of meniscal tears: validation of a new physical exam ination technique for primary care medicine

Knee valgus angle during single leg squat and landing in patellofemoral pain patients and controls

A com prehensive review of physical examination tests of the cervi cal spine, scapula, and rotator cuff

Comprehensive review of provocative and instability physi cal examination tests of the shoulder

Accuracy of the lever sign test in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries

Inter examiner reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome

The role of telehealth as a platform for postoperative visits following rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

The virtual shoulder and knee physical examination

Lever Sign": a new clinical test for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture

Departmental experience and lessons learned with acceler ated introduction of telemedicine during the COVID19 crisis

Telemedicine in orthopaedic surgery: challenges and opportunities

Physical exami nation of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests

Orthopaedic surgical selection and inpatient paradigms during the coronavirus (COVID19) pandemic

Clinical evaluation of patients with patellofemoral disorders

Establishing telemedicine in an academic total joint arthroplasty practice: needs and opportunities highlighted by the COVID19 pandemic

The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries

Qangle and Jsign: indicative of maltracking subgroups in patellofemoral pain

Mobile ehealth: the unwired evolution of telemedicine

Telemedicine in the era of COVID19: the virtual orthopaedic examination

A review of the special tests associated with shoulder examination. Part I: the rotator cuff tests

A review of the special tests associated with shoulder examination. Part II: laxity, instability, and superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions