key: cord-1019041-qfwbs3zw
authors: Balou, Heydar Ali; Yaghubi Kalurazi, Tofigh; Joukar, Farahnaz; Hassanipour, Soheil; Shenagari, Mohammad; Khoshsorour, Mahmoud; Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz
title: High Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)-Specific Antibodies among Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study in Guilan, Iran
date: 2021-10-22
journal: J Environ Public Health
DOI: 10.1155/2021/9081491
sha: 4a887bea55ca9da22d1f12959f0403fd3e9c2305
doc_id: 1019041
cord_uid: qfwbs3zw

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM and IgG antibodies among healthcare workers in Guilan. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 503 healthcare workers. Between April and May 2020, blood samples were collected from the healthcare workers of Razi Hospital in Rasht, Guilan, Iran. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used for the detection and quantitation of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM/IgG antibodies by using kits made by Pishtaz Teb Company, Tehran, Iran. RESULTS: From a total of 503 participants, the result of the anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgM antibody test was positive in 28 subjects (5.6%) and the anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG antibody test was positive in171 subjects (34%). Participants in the age group of 35–54 years were significantly more likely to have a positive anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody test than the age group of 20–34 years (odds ratio = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.04–2.25, P=0.029). Also, physicians were significantly more likely to have a positive antibody test than office workers (odds ratio = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.04–3.54, P=0.037). The wide range of symptoms was significantly associated with the positive anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody test. The most significant association was observed between fever and a positive anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody test (odds ratio = 3.03, 95% CI: 2.06–4.44, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of the current study indicated that the seroprevalence of COVID-19 was high among healthcare workers of Guilan Province. It seems that this finding was due to the earlier exposure to COVID-19 and the lack of awareness and preparedness to deal with the pandemic in Iran, compared to other countries.

In December 2019, an unknown manifestation of pneumonia was detected in Wuhan, China, by a new virus called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1] [2] [3] . Compared to SARS in 2002/2003 and MERS virus in 2012/2014, this virus spreads rapidly [4, 5] . polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method could be used to detect COVID-19 from the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab [15] . e coronavirus RNA test was declared as the standard diagnostic test [16] . However, cases of false negatives have been reported, including 2 cases of failure of this test in quarantined patients, and this can cause a serious return of the virus in the infection transmission cycle [17] . Also, the study by Pan et al. revealed that although the RT-PCR test has been proposed as a standard diagnostic method of COVID-19, it has many limitations [18] . In addition, many false negatives were reported from this diagnostic test [18] . erefore, there is a need for an accurate and rapid testing method, in order to detect the infected patients and asymptomatic carriers rapidly and to prevent the transmission of the disease and ensure timely treatment of patients.

Some studies reported the most common diagnostic methods of COVID-19 in microbiology laboratories were to detect and extract antibodies from serum samples using ELISA [19] [20] [21] [22] . In some studies, the IgG immunoglobulin test was used to determine the seroprevalence of SARS infection [23] . Since it is difficult to achieve a reliable assessment of symptomatic patients with the current diagnostic methods, the rapid and accurate diagnostic methods for COVID-19 are needed. Serological analysis is an accurate and efficient method for screening many pathogens, especially specific IgM and IgG antibodies that are detected by ELISA [24, 25] .

Measurement of IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody titers can play an important role in diagnosing the acute and chronic stages of the disease. In this regard, a study by Demay et al. demonstrated that detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies was a rapid and easy method for screening COVID-19 [26] .

Antibody detection as an effective adjunct to RNA analysis was an important tool for understanding the occurrence, progression, prognosis, and outcome of COVID-19 and had an epidemiological importance [27] . According to a study by Shu et al., IgG antibodies were present in the blood 3 to 40 days after the onset of symptoms [28] . After exposure to pathogens such as viruses, the humoral immune system produces specific antibodies to destroy the pathogens and prevent their progression. In fact, when the virus enters the body, innate immune system cells and factors identify it and immediately inform the adaptive immune system of the presence of this uninvited guest [29] . Innate immune cells, such as macrophages, pick up viral agents and, after processing, deliver them to specific lymphocytes located in the lymph nodes and spleen [30] . First, the IgM antibodies are produced; then, as the immune response progresses and the appropriate signals are received, B lymphocytes become plasma cells which will mostly produce IgG or IgA antibodies [31] .

Studies have shown that, in early immune responses, IgM antibody production is predominant with low quantity and short time. In contrast, IgG production is delayed, but its production is higher and will remain in the serum for a longer period of time and remain in the blood even after the infection is gone, due to immune memory [32] . erefore, the detection of IgM in a suspect's serum could be an immunological evidence of a recent infection. However, the detection of IgG in the serum of an asymptomatic person often indicates a previous infection. In addition, IgM usually begins to decline if the patient is successfully treated [33] . erefore, a similar algorithm must be observed for COVID-19.

COVID-19 poses an important occupational health risk to healthcare workers, which has attracted global scrutiny [34] [35] [36] . As COVID-19 is widely spreading, a rapid and accurate diagnostic method is needed. Serological testing is an accurate and efficient method for screening many pathogens and differentiating between acute and chronic stages of infection. Given that more medical research on the expression of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and the prognosis of COVID-19 is needed, the aim of this study was to detect the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies among healthcare workers in Razi Hospital of Guilan, in 2020.

is cross-sectional study was conducted on 503 healthcare workers of Razi Hospital in Rasht, Guilan (Northern Province of Iran), between April and May 2020.

Razi Hospital, located on Razi Street in Rasht (the center of Guilan Province), is an educational and medical hospital affiliated to Guilan University of Medical Sciences with 204 fixed beds, which was established in 1953. is hospital was selected as the referral center for COVID-19 patients during the peak of the epidemic. e total number of Razi Hospital healthcare workers was 816, of which more than 60% (503) were randomly entered into the study. e sample size was estimated based on the main outcome, namely, the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, with a confidence level of 95%.

Informed consent was obtained from each participant. e study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guilan University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Code: IR. GUMS. REC. 1399.032).

Relevant information was collected in 3 parts. e first part included demographic characteristics of participants (including age, education, gender, household size and marital status, and blood group), the second part collected data on the job category of participants (including physician, nurse, service worker, lab staff, and office staff), and the third part collected data on participants' experience of COVID-19 symptoms during the pandemic (including fever, cough, sore throat, dyspnea, runny nose, fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, headache, chest pain, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, anosmia, and chills).

5 ml blood samples were collected from all participants. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used for the detection and quantitation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibodies by using kits made by Pishtaz Teb Company (Pishtaz Teb Diagnostics, Tehran, Iran). e cutoff provided by the manufacturer for positive anti-IgM and -IgG antibody was 1.1.

Descriptive analyses were reported as mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and number and percentage for qualitative variables. e chi-square test was used to investigate the association between qualitative variables. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with a positive antibody test. All analyzes were performed by SPSS version 20 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

A total of 503 healthcare workers were included in this study. e mean age of the subjects was 39.27 with a standard deviation of 10 years. e majority of the participants were female (68.4%) and were married (70.6%). e result of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody test was positive in 28 subjects (5.6%), and the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody test was positive in168 subjects (33.3%).

e seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies according to the characteristics of the study population is shown in Table 1 .

e comparison of the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the current study with some other studies is presented in Table 2 . e seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers in Rasht was higher than that among healthcare workers in other countries. Figure 1 reveals the results of logistic regression to explore factors associated to the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Although the result of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test was 26% more positive in male than female, this finding was not statistically significant (OR � 1.26, 95% CI: 0.86-1.84, P � 0.235).

Participants in the age group of 35-54 years were significantly more likely to have a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test than the age group of 20-34 years (OR � 1.53, 95% CI: 1.04-2.25, P � 0.029), while this increase was not significant in the age group of more than 54 years than the age group of 20-34 years (OR � 1.07, 95% CI: 0.52-2.20, P � 0.839). e comparison of the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in job categories showed physicians were significantly more likely to have a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test than office workers (OR � 1.92, 95% CI: 1.04-3.54, P � 0.037) while there was no significant difference between other job categories and office workers. e positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test was more common in the A blood group, but this finding was not statistically significant (OR � 1.23, 95% CI: 0.81-1.87, P � 0.329).

More educated participants reported a higher seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, but this finding was not statistically significant (OR � 1.92, 95% CI: 0.63-5.79, P � 0.247).

ere was no independent association of household size and marital status with the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. e results of logistic regression to explore the relationship between the symptoms of COVID-19 and the positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test are shown in Figure 2. e wide range of symptoms was significantly associated with the positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test. e most significant association was observed between fever and a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test (OR � 3.03, 95% CI: 2.06-4.44, P < 0.001). Only sputum cough, runny nose, and sore throat were not significantly associated with a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test.

is study was conducted in one of the referral hospitals for COVID-19 patients during the peak of the epidemic in Guilan Province.

Our study demonstrates that the unweighted seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies in our study population was 5.6% and 33.3%, respectively, and the unweighted seroprevalence of the combination of both IgM and IgG antibodies was 39%. ese findings indicate that the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was higher in the healthcare workers compared to the general population of Guilan Province, which was reported to be 22% in Shakiba et al.'s study [37] . Other studies in the general population reported that the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 5% in Spain [38] , 2.7% in Milan, Italy [39] , 4% in California [40] , 7.6% in Daegu, South Korea [41] , and 1.7% in Luxembourg [42] . In a similar study of healthcare workers in Spain [43] and Pakistan [44] , the seroprevalence was 9.3% and 8.3%, respectively. Signorelli et al. showed that the estimated period-prevalence of COVID-19 in Italy varies from 0.35% in Sicily to 13.3% in Lombardy [45] . In Rostami et al.'s meta-analysis study about SARS-CoV-2 worldwide seroprevalence, results varied from 1.45% in South America to 5.27% in Northern Europe. e findings suggested an association of seroprevalence with human development indices, income levels, and climate [46] . Although the high seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in our study population may be due to the higher risk of contact in healthcare workers than the general population, conducting the study at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic (March to April) and the lack of preparedness to deal with the pandemic in Iran and Rasht can be other reasons for this high prevalence.

Our findings revealed that the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody was higher in males than that in females (42.8 vs. 37.2%, respectively), but it was not statistically significant. is finding was in line with a study in the general population of Switzerland (7.3 in male vs. 4.7% in female), a study in the general population of California (5.18 in male vs. 3.31% in female), and a study in the general population of South Korea (11% in male vs. 4% in female) [40, 41, 47] . In some studies in Spanish healthcare workers, positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests were more prevalent in females, but it was not significant [43] . In a study in the general population of Guilan, Iran, the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody was 23% in females and 22% in males [37] .

In the current study, positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests were significantly more prevalent in the age group of 35-54 years. In other studies, the highest seroprevalence of Journal of Environmental and Public Health anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody was in the following age groups: 20-34 years in a Spanish population, 20-49 years in a Swiss population, more than 60 years in a South Korean population, and 35-54 years in a California population [38, 40, 41, 47] . We found that the highest prevalence of a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test was in physicians. In the study of Spanish healthcare workers, the highest prevalence was in physicians, followed by nurses and laboratory staff [43] . In another study in Pakistan and Spain, the highest prevalence of a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test was in healthcare workers (17% and 10.2%, respectively) compared to other job categories [38, 44] . In a similar study conducted in Guilan, healthcare workers had a higher seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody than the general population (29% vs. 22%) [37] . In Deiana et al.'s study, of the 1371 positive cases analyzed, 323 (23.5%) are healthcare workers and 563 (41.1%) reside in social or healthcare facilities [48] . Another study in Saudi Arabia was conducted between May 20 and 30, 2020, showing that the overall positivity rate by the immunoassay was 299 (2.36%) with a significant difference between the control group (0.8%) and case-hospital group (2.9%) (P value < 0.001) [49] . Kayı et al. in Belgian public multiple-site hospital revealed that the overall seroprevalence was 7.6% and higher seroprevalence was seen in nurses (10.0%) than in physicians (6.4%), paramedical (6.0%), and administrative staff (2.9%). A review study conducted by Kayı HCWs for the year 2020, before vaccinations started [50] . e probable cause for this finding is the higher risk of exposure to the virus in healthcare workers compared to other population groups.

Our study revealed that the highest prevalence of a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test was in participants with more than 16 years of education, which can be justified by considering that the physicians and nurses are more exposed to patients than other healthcare workers.

In the current study, we found no association between household size and the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. In Spain, the highest prevalence of a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test was reported in households with 2 members [38] . In a meta-analysis study, the most common risk factors associated with higher seroprevalence rate in HCWs were ethnicity, male gender, and having a higher number of household contacts [50] . is finding should be interpreted with caution because the house area may be more important than the household size.

Our results revealed that the highest prevalence of a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test was observed in participants with blood group A, but this finding was not statistically significant. In similar seroepidemiological studies, blood group was not investigated. However, the results of some studies reported that the highest risk of COVID-19 mortality was in people with blood group A [51] , which could be in line with our findings.

According to the results of our study, fever was the most common symptom associated with a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test. e study by Sood et al. revealed that fever with an odds ratio of 2.8 and anosmia with an odds ratio of 4.1 were most associated with a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test [40] . In the study by Streeck et al., fever (OR � 4.6), dry cough (OR � 2.8), and anosmia (OR � 18.5) were the most prevalent symptoms associated with a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test [52] . In the study by Liu et al., the most common symptoms associated with mortality were fever, followed by cough and sputum [53] . e probable cause of these findings might be that symptoms such as dry cough, anosmia, and fever were more specific for COVID-19 than other similar diseases such as cold and flu.

e results of the current study indicated that the serological prevalence of COVID-19 was high among healthcare workers of Guilan Province. It seems that this finding was due to the earlier exposure to COVID-19 and the lack of awareness and preparedness to deal with the pandemic in Iran, compared to other countries.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a perspective from China

Sharing solidarity experiences to overcome COVID-19

Features and limitations of litcovid hub for quick access to literature about 6 Journal of Environmental and Public Health COVID-19

Transmission characteristics of MERS and SARS in the healthcare setting: a comparative study

Comparison of confirmed COVID-19 with SARS and MERS cases-Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, radiographic signs and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

COVID-19: specific and non-specific clinical manifestations and symptoms: the current state of knowledge

Association between hypoxemia and mortality in patients with COVID-19

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: a national cross-sectional online survey

Different modes of transmission and containment strategies for COVID-19

Environmental factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 transmission: effect and role of indoor environmental quality in the strategy for COVID-19 infection control

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population about Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis with policy recommendations

Diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): laboratory, PCR, and chest CT imaging findings

Laboratory parameters in detection of COVID-19 patients with positive RT-PCR; a diagnostic accuracy study

Chest X-ray features of SARS-CoV-2 in the emergency department: a multicenter experience from northern Italian hospitals

Performance of oropharyngeal swab testing compared to nasopharyngeal swab testing for diagnosis of COVID-19-United States

e estimation of diagnostic accuracy of tests for COVID-19: a scoping review

Diagnosing COVID-19: the disease and tools for detection

Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and cardiovascular disease

Assay techniques and test development for COVID-19 diagnosis

Analytical and clinical validation of an ELISA for specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies

Low seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers of the largest children hospital in Milan during the pandemic wave

Point prevalence survey to evaluate the seropositivity for COVID-19 among high-risk healthcare workers

Seroprevalence of IgG antibodies to SARS-coronavirus in asymptomatic or subclinical population groups

Diagnostic techniques: serological and molecular approaches

Molecular and serological tests for COVID-19. A comparative review of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus laboratory and point-of-care diagnostics

Dynamic profile for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using four immunochromatographic assays

Understanding antibody testing for COVID-19

Dynamic changes of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients at early stage of outbreak

Immune Function in Sport and Exercise Advances in Sport and Exercise Science Series

Immunity in response to particulate antigen-delivery systems

B cells, antibodies, and more

Overview of the immune response

IgM antibodies induce the production of antibodies of the same specificity

COVID-19 risk factors among health workers: a rapid review

Infection risks faced by public health laboratory services teams when handling specimens associated Journal of Environmental and Public Health 7 with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

COVID-19 in longterm care facilities: an upcoming threat that cannot be ignored

Seroprevalence of COVID-19 virus infection in Guilan province

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence trends in healthy blood donors during the COVID-19 outbreak in Milan

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies among adults in

IgG seroprevalence of COVID-19 among individuals without a history of the coronavirus disease infection in Daegu, Korea

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the luxembourgish population: e CON-VINCE study

Seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among health care workers in a large Spanish reference hospital

Seroprevalence findings from metropoles in Pakistan: implications for assessing COVID-19 prevalence and case-fatality within a dense, urban working population

COVID-19 in Italy: impact of containment measures and prevalence estimates of infection in the general population

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Estimating the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections: systematic review

Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 positive cases beyond health-care professionals or social and health-care facilities

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia: comparing case and control hospitals

e seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among health care workers before the era of vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Association between ABO blood groups and COVID-19

infection, severity and demise: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a German community with a super-spreading event

Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: a comparison with young and middle-aged patients

Acknowledgments e authors would like to thank the Razi Hospital of Guilan University of Medical Sciences for participation in this project.is article is the result of the research project (Grant no. 1399.032) of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Healthcare workers ELISA:Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay COVID- 19 

Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Heydar Ali Balouand and Tofigh Yaghubi Kalurazi are considered co-first authors.

e authors declare no conflicts of interest.

HA. B, T. YK, F. J, and F. MG were involved in concept development (provided idea for the research); F. J, S. H, and F. MG designed the study (planned the methods to generate the results); HA. B and F. MG supervised the work (provided oversight, responsible for organization and implementation, and wrote the manuscript); T. YK, M. K, and M. S were involved in data collection/processing (responsible for experiments, patient management, organization, or reporting data); S. H and F. J performed analysis/interpretation (responsible for statistical analysis, evaluation, and presentation of the results); S. H, F. J, and F. MG conducted literature search; and all authors were involved in writing (responsible for writing a substantive part of the manuscript). Heydar Ali Balouand and Tofigh Yaghubi Kalurazi contributed equally to this report.