key: cord-1016736-xt09q1z5 authors: Preis, Heidi; Mahaffey, Brittain; Heiselman, Cassandra; Lobel, Marci title: Vulnerability and Resilience to Pandemic-Related Stress Among U.S. Women Pregnant at the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic date: 2020-09-06 journal: Soc Sci Med DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113348 sha: 26ad537832efba22a05f9f2a23a8d02f4eaa9891 doc_id: 1016736 cord_uid: xt09q1z5 Rationale. Women pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic are experiencing moderate to high levels of emotional distress, which has previously been shown to be attributable to two types of pandemic-related pregnancy stress: stress associated with feeling unprepared for birth due to the pandemic (Preparedness Stress) and stress related to fears of perinatal COVID-19 infection (Perinatal Infection Stress). Objective. Given the well-documented harms associated with elevated prenatal stress and the critical importance of developing appropriately targeted interventions, we investigated factors predictive of pandemic-related pregnancy stress. Method. Between April 25 and May 15, 2020, 4,451 pregnant women in the U.S. were recruited via social media to complete an online questionnaire that included sociodemographic, medical, and COVID-19 situational factors, as well as the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS). Binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for high stress. Results. Nearly 30% of participants reported high Preparedness Stress; a similar proportion reported high Perinatal Infection Stress. Abuse history, chronic illness, income loss due to the pandemic, perceived risk of having had COVID-19, alterations to prenatal appointments, high-risk pregnancy, and being a woman of color were associated with greater levels of one or both types of stress. Access to outdoor space, older age, and engagement in healthy behaviors were protective against stress. Conclusions. Practices that may alleviate pandemic-related stress such as minimizing disruptions to prenatal care, ensuring access to outdoor space, and motivating engagement in health behaviors are of vital importance. Particular attention is needed for more vulnerable populations including women of color, women with a history of abuse, and those with high-risk pregnancy. Research focused on the short and longer-term impact of pandemic-related pregnancy stress on maternal mental and physical health, perinatal outcomes, and child development is critical to identify these effects and marshal appropriate resources to reduce them. Experiencing a natural disaster or state of emergency during pregnancy is known to contribute to elevated emotional distress (Brooks, Previous research has identified several risk factors for elevated maternal stress, including primiparity, younger age, history of abuse, unplanned pregnancy, financial strain, being a woman of color, and pregnancy complications (see reviews by Bayrampour, 2018; Ibrahim & Lobel, 2020). Nonetheless, the specific factors contributing to women's elevated pandemic related stress have not been well-identified. Recent research identified two major pandemic-related stress domains for pregnant women in the U.S., Poland, Israel, and Germany: stress associated with feeling unprepared for birth due to the COVID-19 pandemic and stress Given the risks associated with elevated prenatal psychological stress and anxiety, and the critical importance of developing evidence-based, appropriately targeted interventions, we investigated which sociodemographic, medical, and situational factors are most associated with greater pandemic-related pregnancy stress among pregnant women in the U.S. and which appear to be protective. Between April 25 and May 15, 2020 (six to nine weeks after the announcement of COVID-19 as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization), 4,451 pregnant women in the U.S. 18+ years of age were recruited through social media to participate in the COVID-19 Pregnancy Experiences (COPE) Study. Facebook-paid advertisements targeted women in the U.S. with pregnancy-related interests. In addition, research assistants posted an identical advertisement for the study on various pregnancy-related social media groups and pages (i.e., Facebook, Instagram, and Reddit). The advertisement included a request to share pregnancyrelated experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants completed the questionnaire through Qualtrics, secure survey software, qualifying them for entry into a raffle for a $100 gift certificate awarded to one in every 100 participants. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Stony Brook University. The study questionnaire included sociodemographic factors (e.g., age, race/ethnicity), medical factors (e.g., parity, chronic illness), COVID-19 situational factors (e.g., COVID-19 related income loss, being diagnosed with COVID-19), and the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy We used binary logistic regression to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds for high levels of Preparedness Stress and Perinatal Infection Stress. Cut-off scores (≥ 4 on the 1-5 response scale) were used to identify women most likely to suffer from moderate or severe levels of stress and to enhance the interpretability of study results. The unadjusted model reveals bivariate associations among predictors and stress outcomes, whereas the adjusted, multivariate models identify the independent association of each predictor after controlling for all other predictors. Participants were on average 30.8 ± 4.7 years old, with an average gestational age of 27 weeks. Participants were from all 50 states, and approximately half were primiparas (n = 2,270, 51.0%). Approximately four-fifths of the sample (n = 3,651; 82%) identified themselves as Non-Hispanic/Latino and White; one-fifth (n = 800; 18%) identified as Hispanic/Latino (n = 420, 9.4%), Black/African American (n = 206; 4.6%), Asian American (n = 128; 2.9%), Native American (n = 105; 2.4%), or Other (n = 134, 3.0%) (numbers and percentages exceed 4,451 and J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 100% because some women endorsed multiple racial/ethnic categories). Fifty-three women (1.2%) reported being diagnosed with COVID-19 during pregnancy, and one-third (n = 1,483, 33.3%) thought they might have contracted COVID-19 during pregnancy but were not diagnosed. Nearly half of the sample (n = 2,037, 45.8%,) lost income due to the pandemic, and 53.4% (n = 2,376) reported having prenatal appointments cancelled or rescheduled due to the pandemic. A large majority (n = 4,002, 89.9%) reported having access to outdoor space "whenever I want" or "sometimes" (versus rarely), and over half of the women (n = 2,492, 56.0%) reported that they were involved in healthy activities (e.g., "eat well, take vitamins, exercise, sleep enough"), scoring at least 4 on the 1 = Very little to 5 = Very much response scale for this item. Nearly 30% of participants reported high levels of Preparedness Stress (27.2%) and Perinatal Infection Stress (29.1%), with 17.9% of the sample reporting high levels of both. As can be seen in Table 1 , in the unadjusted model, Preparedness Stress was predicted by an assortment of sociodemographic, medical, and COVID-related situational factors and Perinatal Infection Stress was predicted by a slightly different constellation of factors. Common risk factors across the unadjusted models predicting Preparedness Stress and Perinatal Infection Stress included sociodemographic vulnerability (e.g., experiencing previous abuse, below average financial status, being a woman of color, not having private insurance) and medical vulnerability (e.g., chronic illness, high-risk pregnancy status). Having access to outdoor space and engaging in healthy prenatal behaviors were associated with lower odds of both types of stress in the unadjusted models. In the adjusted model, high Preparedness Stress was independently predicted by nine factors: previous abuse, primiparity, unplanned pregnancy, self-reported high-risk pregnancy J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f status, multiple pregnancy, chronic illness, COVID-19 related income loss, perceiving that one had been infected, and experiencing alterations of prenatal care (AORs = 1.19-1.78). Older age, healthy behaviors, and access to outdoor space were each independently protective against high levels of this type of stress (AORs = 0.63-0.94). In the adjusted model, high Perinatal Infection Stress was independently predicted by nine factors: being a woman of color, lack of a marital or cohabiting relationship, previous abuse, previous pregnancy loss, self-reported high-risk pregnancy status, chronic illness, COVID-19 related income loss, perceiving that one had been infected, and experiencing alterations to prenatal care (AORs = 1.19-1.53). Older age and access to outdoor space were protective against Perinatal Infection Stress (AORs = 0.67-0.98). Neither gestational age, fertility treatment (endorsed by 10.6% of the sample), psychiatric medication use (endorsed by 12.1% of the sample), nor diagnosis of COVID-19 during pregnancy were significant predictors of high stress in the unadjusted or adjusted models, indicating that high stress was equally common for women irrespective of these characteristics. In the current study, nearly a third of women pregnant during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced elevated levels of stress related to feeling unprepared for birth or being worried about perinatal infection. These high levels of stress appear to be especially common among particular groups of women, including those identified by prior research as vulnerable to high maternal stress: primiparas, women with high risk or unplanned pregnancy, and survivors of abuse (see review by Ibrahim & Lobel, 2020). Although comprising a relatively small portion of the study sample, it is notable that woman of color also reported higher pandemic-related stress. This type of stress coupled with the stressful nature of racial J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f discrimination is an especially detrimental combination for pregnant woman of color who are at significantly greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes affected by stress (Rosenthal & Lobel, 2011; Rosenthal & Lobel, 2020) . Apart from confirming the factors previously established as contributors to prenatal stress, we also identified risk factors that are unique to the pandemic, including experiencing pandemic-related income loss, believing one is infected with COVID-19, and experiencing alterations of prenatal care. At the same time, more than two-thirds of the sample did not experience high levels of pandemic-related stress, and we were able to identify factors that appear to be protective against this type of stress, such as having access to the outdoors and practicing healthy behaviors (Table 1) . These findings corroborate two recent studies that found that physical activity increases resilience among women in Canada (Lebel et al., 2020) prevention (e.g., hygiene, social distancing), may also be helpful in reducing stress related to concerns over infection. Study findings, as well as other recent research (Davenport et al., 2020) , also provide strong evidence to advocate for and promote women's access to the outdoors and to emphasize the value of practicing healthy behaviors, not merely for their physical health value, but also as a way to reduce stress. Routine physical and emotional abuse screening is also more important than ever to protect women who may be sheltering in place with violent partners The present study contributes to our understanding of the experiences of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic and the overall literature on the experience of stress during pregnancy. It provides insight into which women are at greatest risk of elevated stress and how their stress might be alleviated. Such work is critical to the welfare of women and their offspring, especially during periods of global challenges to health and well-being. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Stress and chronic illness: The inflammatory pathway Psychological impact of infectious disease outbreaks on pregnant women: Rapid evidence review. medRxiv Risk factors for antenatal anxiety: A systematic review of the literature The COVID-19 pandemic and perinatal mental health Psychosocial vulnerabilities to upper respiratory infectious illness: Implications for susceptibility to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Uncertainty in times of medical emergency: Knowledge gaps and structural ignorance during the Brazilian zika crisis Psychometric evaluation of the polish version of the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale Elevated depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic Intergenerational health consequences of in utero exposure to maternal stress: Evidence from the 1980 Kswangju uprising Recommendations to the governor to promote increased choice and access to safe maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic Patient-provider communication, maternal anxiety, and self-care in pregnancy Examining inequities associated with changes in obstetric and gynecologic care delivery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Obstetrics & Gynecology Pandemic-related pregnancy stress and anxiety among women pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic Psychometric properties of the pandemic-related pregnancy stress scale (PREPS) Explaining racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes: Unique sources of stress for Black American women Gendered racism and the sexual and reproductive health of Black and Latina women Sociodemographic factors Maternal age Medicaid or uninsured Adjusted odds ratios control for all other variables in the regression model † Included all women who endorsed a racial or ethnic identity other than White-Non-Hispanic ¥ Women who reported being high risk and those who were unsure were grouped together