key: cord-1012236-3hg76dhj authors: Exelmans, W; Knaapen, L; Boonman-de Winter, LJM; Vriens, PWHE; van der Laan, L title: Treating peripheral arterial occlusive disease and acute limb ischemia during a COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 date: 2022-01-31 journal: Ann Vasc Surg DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.01.012 sha: 5b4e067eb5a3b5f99ef96ddee947298813cdd7c5 doc_id: 1012236 cord_uid: 3hg76dhj OBJECTIVE: For many surgeons the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 meant a downscaling of surgical interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the measures taken on the care for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAOD) and acute limb ischemia (ALI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the vascular practices of two major teaching hospitals in the Netherlands was performed. All interventions and outpatient visits for PAOD or ALI in 2020 were included. Patients treated in 2018 and 2019 were to serve as a control group. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: In 2020, a total of 1513 procedures were performed for PAOD or ALI. This did not differ significantly from previous years. Overall, Fontaine 2 and 4 were the most frequent indications for intervention. A significant increase in the number of major amputations was observed in 2020 compared to 2018 (p <0.01). This was mainly due to patients suffering from PAOD Fontaine 4. Inversely, a reduction in the number of femoro-popliteal bypasses was observed between 2020 and 2018. The number of outpatient visit due to Fontaine 2 was significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2018. CONCLUSION: The vascular practices of our hospitals were minimally influenced by the measures taken due to the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. There was an increase in the number of amputation but an enormous surge in patients presenting with critical limb ischemia was not observed. Approval of the Manuscript; Agreement to be Accountable We know of no conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. For many surgeons the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 meant a downscaling of surgical interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the measures taken on the care for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAOD) and acute limb ischemia (ALI). A retrospective analysis of the vascular practices of two major teaching hospitals in the Netherlands was performed. All interventions and outpatient visits for PAOD or ALI in 2020 were included. Patients treated in 2018 and 2019 were to serve as a control group. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. In 2020, a total of 1513 procedures were performed for PAOD or ALI. This did not differ significantly from previous years. Overall, Fontaine 2 and 4 were the most frequent indications for intervention. A significant increase in the number of major amputations was observed in 2020 compared to 2018 (p <0.01). This was mainly due to patients suffering from PAOD Fontaine 4. Inversely, a reduction in the number of femoro-popliteal bypasses was observed between 2020 and 2018. The number of outpatient visit due to Fontaine 2 was significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2018. The vascular practices of our hospitals were minimally influenced by the measures taken due to the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. There was an increase in the number of amputation but an enormous surge in patients presenting with critical limb ischemia was not observed. In 2020 vascular surgeons worldwide had to alter their practices due to the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)(1-3). When the number of infected patients requiring hospital admission rose, operating time and outpatient visits were reduced. During 2020 the Dutch government proclaimed two periods of national lockdown. The first was from 16 March until the 11 May 2020 and the second from 14 of October 2020 until the end of the year. This meant a partial shutdown of public life. During these periods operating capacity was reviewed on a weekly basis and surgical procedures were prioritized using recommendations issued by the Dutch Society for Surgery (4). Previous research from our group demonstrated an increased number of major amputations during the first lockdown period (5) . Although many publications describe the reality during one lockdown period, data is lacking that describes an entire year. The present study therefore evaluates the number of procedures for peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and acute limb ischemia (ALI) during 2020 in two large teaching hospitals in the province of Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands. A procedure-based query was applied to the electronic health record of both hospitals. All interventions for PAOD and ALI from 1 January 2020 until 31 December 2020 were included. Procedures performed during the same period in 2018 and 2019 served as a control group. Interventions are classified in one of the following categories: angioplasty/stenting, endarterectomy, femoro-popliteal bypass, femoro-distal bypass, embolectomy/thrombolysis and major limb amputations. Major limb amputation is defined as an amputation above the level of the ankle. In case of PAOD the Fontaine classification is used: Fontaine 2 (claudication), Fontaine 3 (ischemic rest pain or nocturnal pain), Fontaine 4 (necrosis and/or gangrene). For ALI no further classification is used. All interventions for aneurysmal disease, carotid artery disease and minor amputations (foot and digiti) were excluded. Similarly, we collected data on visits to our outpatient clinic. Visits linked to a new diagnosis of PAOD or ALI were eligible for inclusion. This study was approved by the local ethics committees in both hospitals and informed consent was waived. The primary outcomes are the number and type of procedures performed. Secondary outcome is the indication for the intervention. For the outpatient clinic this is the number of visits. Descriptive statistics are used to present baseline characteristics and outcome measures. Categorical variables are presented as numbers with percentages. Continuous variables are presented as means with range. The chi-squared test is used to test for significant 6 differences between categorical variables. For continuous variables, an analysis of variance test is performed for multiple testing. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 25. In 2020, a total of 1513 procedures for PAOD or ALI were performed in 885 patients. In In 2018 and 2019 this number was 135 ± 13.4 and 125 ± 13.8 (Table I ). No significant difference in age or sex was found between the investigated years. There was no significant difference in the total number of peripheral vascular procedures between 2020 and the control years. and 2018 (n =102). Similar to the major amputations, the reduction of femoro-popliteal bypasses compared to 2019 (n =68) was not significant. We found no significant difference in all other categories of procedures. In total, ALI was the indication for intervention in 128 cases (8.5%; 95% CI (7.1-9.9)). This did not differ significantly from 159 cases (9.8%; 95% CI (8. In general, the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 forced hospitals to redirect medical resources and prioritize surgical interventions. This study could not find a significant difference in the total number of interventions for PAOD or ALI between the investigated years. However, studies that looked at the impact of the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections describe a reduction in the number of interventions (6) (7) (8) . There are varying observations in studies that look at a longer period of time. In Sweden no significant reduction in the number of vascular interventions was observed when comparing 2020 to the previous years (9), taking into account that they had no formal period of lockdown. Reports from Massachusetts observe a decline in procedures between 18 March 2020 and the end of the year, even after resumption of normal services (10) . Initiatives like the Vascular Surgery COVID-19 Collaborative (VASCC) (11) and the COVID-19 Vascular Service (COVER) study (12) will hopefully further elucidate the impact of de SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on vascular practices worldwide. Previous research suggests an increase in the number of major amputations (1, 2, 5, 10, 13) . In the present study, we confirmed these findings. This mainly due to an increase in amputations for Fontaine 4. As in earlier publications this is ascribed to a delay in presentation in a more recent report (10) . Inverse to the number of amputations we saw a reduction in the number of femoro-popliteal bypasses, an operation typically performed in patients with Fontaine 4. This reduction in lower extremity revascularization was observed by some (10) but not by other authors (1, 2) . Interestingly, the number of interventions for ALI was not significantly altered in the present study. Since the effect of SARS-CoV-2 on the prevalence of arterial thrombosis is still uncertain (14) , our findings might help comprehend this along with data from future publications. Our results are in line with others studies that reported a reduction in the number of outpatient visits during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections (1, 7, 13) . This is mainly due to a reduction in the number of patients presenting with Fontaine 2. The number of patients with Fontaine 3 and 4 remained somewhat constant. One of the strengths of the present study is its large sample size from two hospitals. It investigated a longer period of time than previous studies. The choice for the evaluation of a calendar year was made from a hospital management perspective. From a disease perspective a year starting in March might have been more suitable. Another limitation of this study is its retrospective nature. The vascular practices of our hospitals were minimally influenced by the measures taken due to the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2. There was an increase in the number of amputation but an enormous surge in patients presenting with critical limb ischemia was not observed. Continued reporting on changes in our practice are needed to fully comprehend the impact of the ongoing pandemic. Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. * Chi-squared test for categorical variables; ANOVA test for continuous variables. Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on an academic vascular practice and a multidisciplinary limb preservation program Experience from a Singapore tertiary hospital with restructuring of a vascular surgery practice in response to national and institutional policies during the COVID-19 pandemic The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgery practice in the United States Handvat voor chirurgische ingrepen tijdens Corona crisis Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown Strategy on Vascular Surgery Practice: More Major Amputations than Usual Impact of COVID-19 on Peripheral Arterial Disease Treatment Indirect casualties of COVID-19: perspectives from an American vascular surgery practice at a tertiary care centre Early vascular surgery response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a nationwide survey The Impact of Covid-19 on Vascular Procedures in Sweden 2020 Changes in vascular surgery practice patterns 1 year into the COVID-19 pandemic Vascular Surgery COVID-19 Collaborative" (VASCC) Study protocol for COvid-19 Vascular sERvice (COVER) study: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision, practice and outcomes of vascular surgery An increased severity of peripheral arterial disease in the COVID-19 era Update of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Acute Limb Ischaemia in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, based on a scoping review of the literature