key: cord-1000639-c7a5mt0y authors: Di Minno, Matteo Nicola Dario; Calcaterra, Ilenia; Lupoli, Roberta; Storino, Antonio; Spedicato, Giorgio Alfredo; Maniscalco, Mauro; Di Minno, Alessandro; Ambrosino, Pasquale title: Hemostatic Changes in Patients with COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis with Meta-Regressions date: 2020-07-15 journal: J Clin Med DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072244 sha: 440a73c920aed3ce358c05d756ec6f7cb3b16cf4 doc_id: 1000639 cord_uid: c7a5mt0y Background: Complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include coagulopathy. We performed a meta-analysis on the association of COVID-19 severity with changes in hemostatic parameters. Methods: Data on prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), D-Dimer, platelets (PLT), or fibrinogen in severe versus mild COVID-19 patients, and/or in non-survivors to COVID-19 versus survivors were systematically searched. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated. Results: Sixty studies comparing 5487 subjects with severe and 9670 subjects with mild COVID-19 documented higher PT (SMD: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.21, 0.60), D-Dimer (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.52, 0.82), and fibrinogen values (SMD: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.21, 2.47), with lower PLT count (SMD: −0.74; 95%CI: −1.01, −0.47) among severe patients. Twenty-five studies on 1511 COVID-19 non-survivors and 6287 survivors showed higher PT (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.39, 0.96) and D-Dimer values (SMD: 3.88; 95%CI: 2.70, 5.07), with lower PLT count (SMD: −0.60, 95%CI: −0.82, −0.38) among non-survivors. Regression models showed that C-reactive protein values were directly correlated with the difference in PT and fibrinogen. Conclusions: Significant hemostatic changes are associated with COVID-19 severity. Considering the risk of fatal complications with residual chronic disability and poor long-term outcomes, further studies should investigate the prognostic role of hemostatic parameters in COVID-19 patients. In December 2019, a cluster of patients with pneumonia of unknown origin was linked to a seafood wholesale market in Wuhan, China. A novel coronavirus, named 2019-nCoV or SARS-CoV-2, was isolated from human airway epithelial cells belonging to the subgenus sarbecovirus, Orthocoronavirinae subfamily [1] . Despite extensive control efforts implemented as part of a global containment strategy to minimize exportation, SARS-CoV-2 showed an international spread that led to a pandemic diffusion [2] . Epidemiologic data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 causes the Coronavirus Disease Data synthesis and analyses were performed by using comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 2, Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA, 2005) . Because of the heterogeneity in laboratory techniques, reference values, and units of measurement, differences in PT, aPTT, D-Dimer, PLT, and fibrinogen between cases and controls were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), which represents the difference between the weighted mean and the standard deviation of the outcome in cases and controls. For all evaluated outcomes, data from study group 1 and study group 2 were separately analyzed. The pooled effect was tested using Z-scores, with p < 0.05 being considered statically significant. We evaluated statistical heterogeneity among studies with chi-squared Cochran's Q test and with I 2 index, which measures the inconsistency among results of studies and defines the proportion of total variation in study estimates that is due to heterogeneity rather than sampling error. In particular, an I 2 value of 25% corresponds to low, 25-50% to moderate, and 50% to high heterogeneity [17] . Funnel plots of the standard difference in means vs. the standard error were used as a graphical representation of publication bias. To detect a potential small-study effect, visual inspection of funnel plots asymmetry was performed. Moreover, the Egger's test was used to assess publication bias over and above any subjective evaluation, with a p < 0.10 being considered statistically significant [18] . In case of a significant publication bias, the Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill method allowed for the assessment of the adjusted effect size [19] . To be as conservative as possible, the random-effect method was used to take into account the heterogeneity among the included studies. To evaluate whether demographic variables (mean age and prevalence of male sex) and clinical data (CRP levels, prevalence of diabetes, and prevalence of hypertension) may impact on differences in the hemostatic outcomes between cases and controls, we implemented multiple meta-regression analyses with differences in PT, aPTT, D-Dimer, PLT, and fibrinogen as dependent variables (y) and the above-mentioned covariates as independent variables (x). Comprehensive meta-analysis (Version 2, Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA, 2005) was used for the multivariate approach. After excluding duplicate results, the search retrieved 518 articles. Of them, we excluded 194 because they were found to be off topic after scanning the title and/or the abstract, and 197 reviews/ comments/case reports or studies lacking data of interest. Another 43 studies were eliminated after a full evaluation of the texts. Four studies [20] [21] [22] [23] reported data on the same study sample. Thus, most recent studies with the largest samples were included in the analysis [20, 23] (Supplemental Figure S1) . Overall, 84 studies were included in the final analyses. Of them, 60 studies reported on a total of 5487 subjects with severe COVID-19 and 9670 subjects with mild COVID-19 [6, 8, . In addition, 25 studies on a total of 1511 subjects dead with COVID-19 and 6287 subjects survived to COVID-19 were included in the meta-analysis [20, 23, 26, 74, . Principal characteristics of subjects enrolled in included studies are shown in Table 1 . The number of patients varied from 17 to 4468, the male sex represented 53.9% of the study population (range: 9.1-81.0%), and the mean age was 54.4 years (range: 35.6-70.7). Diabetes was found in 16.5% (range: 3.2-100%) of patients and hypertension in 28.7% (range: 5.0-83.0%). The mean value of CRP in patients enrolled was 47.7 mg/L (range: 3.14-192.0). A total of 23 studies [6, 8, 25, 26, 31, 32, 35, 38, 40, 41, [44] [45] [46] 54, 61, 63, 64, 67, 68, 70, 73, 76, 81] showed significantly higher PT values in 1041 subjects with severe COVID-19 as compared to 3835 subjects with mild COVID-19 (SMD: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.21, 0.60, p < 0.001, Figure 1 ). The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 84.3%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 22 A total of 23 studies [6, 8, 25, 26, 31, 32, 35, 38, 40, 41, [44] [45] [46] 54, 61, 63, 64, 67, 68, 70, 73, 76, 81] showed significantly higher PT values in 1041 subjects with severe COVID-19 as compared to 3835 subjects with mild COVID-19 (SMD: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.21, 0.60, p < 0.001, Figure 1 ). The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 84.3%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. In contrast, no difference was found in 23 studies [6, 8, 25, 26, 31, 32, 35, 36, 38, 40, 41, [44] [45] [46] 51, 54, 63, 64, 67, 68, 73, 76, 81] reporting aPTT values between 1018 subjects with severe COVID-19 In contrast, no difference was found in 23 studies [6, 8, 25, 26, 31, 32, 35, 36, 38, 40, 41, [44] [45] [46] 51, 54, 63, 64, 67, 68, 73, 76, 81] reporting aPTT values between 1018 subjects with severe COVID-19 and 3976 subjects with mild disease (SMD: 0.04; 95%CI: −0.17, 0.25, p = 0.701; I 2 : 86.1%, p < 0.001, Figure 2 ). and 3976 subjects with mild disease (SMD: 0.04; 95%CI: −0.17, 0.25, p = 0.701; I 2 : 86.1%, p < 0.001, Figure 2 ). Forty-nine studies [6, 8, [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] 38, [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] 55, [57] [58] [59] 61, [63] [64] [65] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] 76, 77, 80, 81, 87] showed higher D-Dimer levels in 5024 subjects with severe COVID-19 than in 8052 subjects with mild COVID-19 (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.52, 0.82, p < 0.001, Figure 3 ). Heterogeneity was significant (I 2 : 90.4%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. Significantly lower PLT count (SMD: −0.74; 95%CI: −1.01, −0.47, p < 0.001, Figure 4 ) was found between 1956 subjects with severe COVID-19 as compared to 6546 mild subjects enrolled in 38 studies [6, [24] [25] [26] 28, 29, [31] [32] [33] 36, 37, 39, 41, 44, 45, [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] 56, [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [66] [67] [68] [73] [74] [75] [76] 78, 79, 87] . The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 95.5%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced after excluding one study at a time. A total of 18 studies [28, 30, [32] [33] [34] [35] 38, 40, [44] [45] [46] [47] 51, 57, 59, 61, 71, 81] showed significantly higher fibrinogen values in 469 subjects with severe as compared to 1434 subjects with mild COVID-19 (SMD: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.21, 2.47, p < 0.001, Figure 5 ). The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 95.8%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. Forty-nine studies [6, 8, [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] 38, [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] 55, [57] [58] [59] 61, [63] [64] [65] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] 76, 77, 80, 81, 87] showed higher D-Dimer levels in 5024 subjects with severe COVID-19 than in 8052 subjects with mild COVID-19 (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.52, 0.82, p < 0.001, Figure 3 ). Heterogeneity was significant (I 2 : 90.4%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. Significantly lower PLT count (SMD: −0.74; 95%CI: −1.01, −0.47, p < 0.001, Figure 4 ) was found between 1956 subjects with severe COVID-19 as compared to 6546 mild subjects enrolled in 38 studies [6, [24] [25] [26] 28, 29, [31] [32] [33] 36, 37, 39, 41, 44, 45, [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] 56, [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [66] [67] [68] [73] [74] [75] [76] 78, 79, 87] . The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 95.5%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced after excluding one study at a time. A total of 18 studies [28, 30, [32] [33] [34] [35] 38, 40, [44] [45] [46] [47] 51, 57, 59, 61, 71, 81] showed significantly higher fibrinogen values in 469 subjects with severe as compared to 1434 subjects with mild COVID-19 (SMD: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.21, 2.47, p < 0.001, Figure 5 ). The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 95.8%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. A total of 15 studies [20, 23, 26, 83, [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [95] [96] [97] [98] 100, 102] showed significantly higher PT values in 840 subjects dead with COVID-19 as compared to 3287 subjects survived to COVID-19 (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.39, 0.96, p < 0.001, Figure 1 ). The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 90.2%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. No significant difference was found in 11 studies [20, 26, [86] [87] [88] [89] [95] [96] [97] [98] 100] reporting aPTT values between 475 subjects dead with COVID-19 and 2774 subjects survived to COVID-19 (SMD: −0.18; 95%CI: −0.89, 0.52 p = 0.609; I 2 : 97.3%, p < 0.001, Figure 2) . Twenty-two studies [20, 26, 74, [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] 102] showed higher D-Dimer levels in 1149 subjects dead with COVID-19 as compared to 4407 subjects survived to COVID-19 (SMD: 3.88; 95%CI: 2.70, 5.07, p < 0.001, Figure 3) . The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 99.4%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. A lower PLT count (SMD: −0.60, 95%CI: −0.82, −0.38; p < 0.001, Figure 4 ) was found in 1339 nonsurvivors to COVID-19 as compared to 5637 survivors enrolled in 21 studies [20, 22, 26, 74, [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] 97, 98, [100] [101] [102] . The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 90.3%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. A total of nine studies [20, 84, 86, 89, 92, [96] [97] [98] 100] showed comparable fibrinogen values in 429 subjects dead with COVID-19 as compared to 2472 subjects survived (SMD: 0.08; 95%CI: −0.14, 0.31, p = 0.475, Figure 5 ). The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 67.1%, p = 0.002) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. A total of 15 studies [20, 23, 26, 83, [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [95] [96] [97] [98] 100, 102] showed significantly higher PT values in 840 subjects dead with COVID-19 as compared to 3287 subjects survived to COVID-19 (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.39, 0.96, p < 0.001, Figure 1 ). The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 90.2%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. No significant difference was found in 11 studies [20, 26, [86] [87] [88] [89] [95] [96] [97] [98] 100] reporting aPTT values between 475 subjects dead with COVID-19 and 2774 subjects survived to COVID-19 (SMD: −0.18; 95%CI: −0.89, 0.52 p = 0.609; I 2 : 97.3%, p < 0.001, Figure 2) . Twenty-two studies [20, 26, 74, [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] 102] showed higher D-Dimer levels in 1149 subjects dead with COVID-19 as compared to 4407 subjects survived to COVID-19 (SMD: 3.88; 95%CI: 2.70, 5.07, p < 0.001, Figure 3) . The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 99.4%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. A lower PLT count (SMD: −0.60, 95%CI: −0.82, −0.38; p < 0.001, Figure 4 ) was found in 1339 non-survivors to COVID-19 as compared to 5637 survivors enrolled in 21 studies [20, 22, 26, 74, [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] 97, 98, [100] [101] [102] . The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 90.3%, p < 0.001) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. A total of nine studies [20, 84, 86, 89, 92, [96] [97] [98] 100] showed comparable fibrinogen values in 429 subjects dead with COVID-19 as compared to 2472 subjects survived (SMD: 0.08; 95%CI: −0.14, 0.31, p = 0.475, Figure 5 ). The heterogeneity among studies was significant (I 2 : 67.1%, p = 0.002) and was not reduced by the exclusion of one study at a time. Visual inspection of funnel plots and the Egger's test suggested the absence of publication bias and of small-study effect for studies evaluating PT, aPTT, and PLT. In contrast, a significant publication bias was found for D-Dimer and fibrinogen, confirmed by the Egger's test (Egger's p < 0.001 and p = 0.039, respectively). Of interest, the Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill analysis substantially confirmed all results for D-Dimer (SMD: 2.08; 95%CI: 1.63, 2.53) and fibrinogen (SMD: 1.34; 95%CI: 0.91, 1.78) after trimming and imputing studies (Supplemental Figure S2) . Meta-regression models showed an impact of CRP levels on the difference in PT (Z-value: 2.27, p = 0.023) and fibrinogen (Z-value: 2.89, p = 0.004). Male sex was associated with a lower difference in D-Dimer (Z-value: −2.43, p = 0.015) and PLT levels (Z-value: 1.97, p = 0.048). A higher difference in fibrinogen was observed for increasing prevalence of hypertension (Z-value: 2.63, p = 0.009) (Supplemental Table S1 ). Results of the present meta-analysis consistently show that patients with severe COVID-19 exhibit higher PT, D-Dimer, and fibrinogen values, with a lower PLT count than subjects with mild disease. A significant difference for PT, D-Dimer, and PLT was also found in non-survivors to COVID-19, with similar fibrinogen levels as compared to survivors. Regression models further refined results, showing that differences in PT and fibrinogen levels directly correlated with the degree of inflammation, as expressed by CRP values. Moreover, prevalence of male sex significantly impacted the difference in D-Dimer levels and PLT count. Last, a higher difference in fibrinogen was observed for increasing prevalence of hypertension. In the attempt to identify new biomarkers of disease severity, some meta-analytical studies have been performed so far on a similar topic, with contrasting results. Our findings are partially consistent with those of a previous meta-analysis [103] , documenting significantly higher PT and D-Dimer levels in patients with severe COVID-19. However, differing from our findings, the authors documented no significant difference in PLT levels between severe and mild patients. Two further meta-analyses were specifically focused on PLT, showing that a low PLT count is associated with an increased risk of severe disease and mortality in patients with COVID-19 [104, 105] . Overall, literature data about hemostatic parameters and COVID-19 have rapidly grown and these previous meta-analyses included a limited number of available studies. Here, we report the largest meta-analysis (84 studies) including multiple hemostatic parameters, with the aim to provide a comprehensive overview on the association between COVID-19 severity and hemostatic changes. In the past decade, thrombocytopenia was documented in more than 50% of patients infected with SARS, being this laboratory finding identified as a significant predictor of mortality [106, 107] with a high prognostic value [108] . Thrombocytopenia is common in several critical conditions, suggesting the presence of severe organ dysfunction and, in some cases, the development of intravascular coagulopathy [109] . Besides thrombocytopenia, our study suggests that both severe patients and non-survivors to COVID-19 exhibit significantly higher values of D-Dimer and prolonged PT. The prognostic role of PT has been evaluated in several clinical settings, being identified as a predictor of death after myocardial infarction [110, 111] , after surgical intervention [112] , in acute decompensated heart failure [113] or in neoplastic diseases [114] . PT is commonly used to evaluate the extrinsic and common pathways of coagulation, thus detecting low fibrinogen concentrations and deficiencies of factors II, V, VII, and X [115] . On the other hand, aPTT evaluates the function of all clotting factors with the only exception of factor VII [115] . As factor VII is the one with the shortest half-life, PT is the first hemostatic parameter affected in many clinical conditions [116] . In our meta-analysis, we documented a significant prolongation of PT, without significant modifications in aPTT. In this regard, some hypotheses can be done, such as the highly increased factor VIII activity [117] correcting an otherwise prolonged aPTT [118] . However, considering the hepatic origin of clotting factors and the short half-life of factor VII [119] , we can also hypothesize that a prolonged PT with normal aPTT may be due to acute liver dysfunction. This is in line with the observed association between altered liver markers and COVID-19 severity [120] . Recent studies demonstrated that patients with severe COVID-19 have increased incidence of abnormal liver function, with significantly higher values of transaminases as compared to subjects with a mild disease [25, 37] . In keeping with this, a recent meta-analysis confirmed the presence of hepatic impairments in SARS and MERS Coronaviridae infections [121] . Several hypotheses have been made to explain the presence of liver injury in severe COVID-19 patients, such as the fact that a high positive end-expiratory pressure may determine hepatic congestion through an increase in right atrial pressure [120] . However, the hypothesis of a concomitant liver damage from virally-induced cytotoxic T cells seems to be the most convincing [120] . The observation of higher PT values both in severe COVID-19 patients and non-survivors could also be interpreted from an alternative (or additional) point of view. In 2003, a total of 2.5% of SARS patients showed evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), being this condition frequently associated with death [122] . Accordingly, among 183 in-hospital patients with COVID-19, 71.4% of non-survivors had overt DIC as compared to only 0.6% of survivors [21] . The development of a consumption coagulopathy in severe COVID-19 may account also for the lower PLT count and the increased D-Dimer levels documented in our meta-analysis, in line with the laboratory criteria for overt DIC proposed by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) [123] . However, most patients with severe COVID-19 may not fulfill ISTH criteria for DIC, as coagulopathy seems to have its specific features in this clinical setting. For example, thrombocytopenia is less pronounced in severe COVID-19 patients as compared to sepsis-related DIC, while D-Dimer levels are exceptionally high [124] . Moreover, we documented higher fibrinogen levels in severe patients when compared with mild subjects, thus refuting the hypothesis of a consumption coagulopathy in this clinical setting. In line with previous evidence [117] , this finding is further supported by the lack of changes in aPTT values both in severe and in COVID-19 non-survivors. A further interesting finding is the direct correlation between CRP and PT values. CRP levels correlate with the intensity of the systemic inflammatory response and, since hemostasis and inflammation are strictly related [125] , this supports the hypothesis of a systemic activation of the coagulation system in response to a dysregulation of the inflammatory markers. This is also in agreement with the increase in fibrinogen levels, mainly documented in most severe patients. Taken together, the currently available evidence seems to suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection can rapidly evolve into a severe condition with pulmonary and multiorgan complications, potentially resulting in a consistent hemostatic imbalance with hypercoagulable state. However, the exact mechanisms behind the observed hemostatic changes in severe COVID-19 patients are still unclear. It has been hypothesized that the coagulopathy in SARS-CoV-2 infection may be a combination of a low-grade DIC with its distinct features and a localized pulmonary thrombotic microangiopathy [124] . Alternatively, the hemostatic imbalance has been associated to the severe inflammatory state [117] . The high frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies documented among critically ill COVID-19 patients has also been related to the genesis of the hypercoagulable state [126, 127] . In the meantime, a growing amount of literature data suggests that a high incidence of thromboembolic complications is expected among severe and critical patients with COVID-19, even in the presence of adequate thromboprophylaxis [128, 129] . Further cohort studies are needed to clarify the pathogenesis and the prognostic value of the hemostatic changes associated to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This could allow for the identification of new markers of disease progression. Moreover, considering the unknown long-term outcomes of COVID-19, the growing amount of studies suggesting the presence of a residual chronic disability, and the need of post-discharge rehabilitation after the acute phase [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] , it is essential to identify new biomarkers related to the disease for an adequate management of critical patients even after ICU (e.g., general ward, rehabilitation centers, and home). The hypothesis that persistent thromboembolic phenomena may contribute to the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 [136, 137] and to the functional sequelae of critically ill patients after discharge [12, 129] further supports the urgent need of studies addressing the mechanisms of such hemostatic imbalance in this clinical setting. Some potential limitations of our study need to be discussed. First, studies included in our meta-analysis enrolled patients with different characteristics, since these studies had different inclusion and exclusion criteria. Moreover, considerable information is missing in included studies. Considering that meta-analyses are performed on pooled data, our meta-regression models allowed for the adjustment for some-but not all-potential confounders. Thus, although the multivariate approach was able to refine analyses by assessing the influence of most clinical and demographic variables on the observed results, our findings should be interpreted with great caution. Second, most results of our meta-analysis were affected by significant heterogeneity. Although it was not possible to definitively identify the origin of such heterogeneity, the impact of major clinical and demographic variables on our results was evaluated through regression models. Moreover, we excluded the presence of publication bias by using different methods. Finally, we performed our analyses by using SMD instead of mean difference, this method being designed to be used when the same outcome is evaluated in a variety of ways [138] . This allowed us to provide consistent meta-analytical information with an appropriate statistical methodology, but we were not able to provide a quantitative measure of the difference in the hemostatic parameters between cases and controls. This partially reduces the clinical relevance of our results. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that significant hemostatic changes are associated with COVID-19 severity. Strict monitoring of these parameters is needed to identify early modifications with the aim to stratify the death risk and to implement adequate therapeutic approaches. Considering the risk of fatal complications and poor long-term outcomes, further studies should better define the prognostic role of hemostatic parameters in COVID-19 patients. Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/7/2244/s1, Figure S1 : Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram, Figure S2 : Funnel plots of effect size versus standard error for studies evaluating the difference in PT, aPTT, D-Dimer, platelet count and fibrinogen, Table S1 : Meta-regression analyses. Impact of age, male gender, hypertension, diabetes, and C-reactive protein (CRP) on the difference in PT, D-Dimer, platelet count, and fibrinogen levels, Table S2 A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China World Health Organization Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China Real-Time tentative assessment of the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus infections in Wuhan, China, as at 22 Clinical features and treatment of COVID-19 patients in northeast Chongqing A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet The first 2019 novel coronavirus case in Nepal Challenge for rehabilitation after hospitalization for COVID-19 COVID-19 and functional disability: Current insights and rehabilitation strategies Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chronic Dis Disseminated intravascular coagulation Prognostic value of a new quantitative D-dimer test in critically ill patients 24 and 48 h following admission to the intensive care unit Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia Thrombocytopenia and its association with mortality in patients with COVID-19 Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study Risk factors for disease progression in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients-a multi-center observational study Clinical and immunologic features in severe and moderate Coronavirus Disease Longitudinal hematologic and immunologic variations associated with the progression of COVID-19 patients in China Suspected myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19: Evidence from front-line clinical observation in Wuhan Clotting factors in COVID-19: Epidemiological association and prognostic values in different clinical presentations in an Italian Cohort Dynamic profile and clinical implications of hematological parameters in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 A novel simple scoring model for predicting severity of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection Hospitalization and critical care of 109 decedents with COVID-19 Pneumonia in Wuhan Correlation between the variables collected at admission and progression to severe cases during hospitalization among patients with COVID-19 in Chongqing COVID-19 with Different Severities: A Multicenter Study of Clinical Features The clinical implication of dynamic neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and D-dimer in COVID-19: A retrospective study in Suzhou China Diagnostic utility of clinical laboratory data determinations for patients with the severe COVID-19 A tool to early predict severe corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A multicenter study using the risk nomogram in Wuhan and Guangdong, China Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection Serum Amyloid A is a biomarker of severe Coronavirus Disease and poor prognosis Plasma albumin levels predict risk for nonsurvivors in critically ill patients with COVID-19 Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the occurrence of critical Illness in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 CT quantification of pneumonia lesions in early days predicts progression to severe illness in a cohort of COVID-19 patients Clinical characteristics of 30 medical workers infected with new coronavirus pneumonia Characteristics and associations with severity in COVID-19 patients: A multicenter cohort study from Jiangsu province Potential therapeutic effects of dipyridamole in the severely ill patients with COVID-19 Correlation between relative nasopharyngeal virus RNA load and lymphocyte count disease severity in patients with COVID-19 Clinical features and progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome in coronavirus disease 2019 Clinical characteristics and co-infections of 354 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study Clinical characteristics and prognosis in cancer patients with COVID-19: A single center's retrospective study Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease Characteristics of the initial patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A single-center report Incidence of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 Clinical characteristics of refractory COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 112 cardiovascular disease patients infected by 2019-nCoV Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease Platelet-To-Lymphocyte ratio is associated with prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease-19 Low testosterone levels predict clinical adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients The value of clinical parameters in predicting the severity of COVID-19 Angiopoietin-2 as a marker of endothelial activation is a good predictor factor for intensive care unit admission of COVID-19 patients Abnormalities of peripheral blood system in patients with COVID-19 in Characteristics and prognostic factors of disease severity in patients with COVID-19: The Beijing experience Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: An observational cohort study Early risk factors of the exacerbation of Coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia Clinical characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China The laboratory tests and host immunity of COVID-19 patients with different severity of illness Epidemiological and clinical features of 125 Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Fuyang Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease Early antiviral treatment contributes to alleviate the severity and improve the prognosis of patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Clinical characteristics of non-ICU hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and liver injury: A retrospective study Suppressed T cell-mediated immunity in patients with COVID-19: A clinical retrospective study in Wuhan Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes abnormal laboratory results of multiple organs in patients Clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with COVID-19 Analysis of the clinical characteristics, drug treatments and prognoses of 136 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 A retrospective study of risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in hospitalized adult patients Epidemiologic features and clinical course of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 221 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan Clinical characteristics of 161 cases of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Changsha The hemocyte counts as a potential biomarker for predicting disease progression in COVID-19: A retrospective study Risk factors associated with disease progression in a cohort of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus Analysis of coagulation parameters in patients with COVID-19 in ICU and ventilator mortality among critically Ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 Clinical characteristics and outcomes of older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China (2019): A single-centered, retrospective study Image-Proven thromboembolism in patients with severe COVID-19 in a tertiary critical care unit in the United Kingdom Cardiac injuries in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: Not to be ignored Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing ILD: A retrospective study in a single center in Wuhan Clinical Characteristics of deceased patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan Association of clinical and radiographic findings with the outcomes of 93 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan Hematological features of persons with COVID-19 Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Prognostic value of C-reactive protein in patients with COVID-19 High mortality in COVID-19 patients with mild respiratory disease Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensiv. Care Med Is albumin predictor of mortality in COVID-19? Clinical course and outcome of 107 patients infected with the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, discharged from two hospitals in Wuhan Clinical and laboratory predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19: A cohort study in Wuhan, China Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe covid-19 with diabetes Obesity predisposes to the risk of higher mortality in young COVID-19 patients The clinical data from 19 critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study Short term outcomes and risk factors for mortality in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective study Early decrease in blood platelet count is associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients-indications for predictive, preventive, and personalized medical approach Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study Changes in blood coagulation in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis The association between severe COVID-19 and low platelet count: Evidence from 31 observational studies involving 7613 participants Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A meta-analysis Death risk factors of severe acute respiratory syndrome with acute respiratory distress syndrome Thrombocytopenia in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (review) Prognostic factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome: A clinical analysis of 165 cases Assessing thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: The past, present, and future Prothrombin levels and fatality rates in acute myocardial infarction Predictive value of prothrombin time for all-cause mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients Low Platelet counts and prolonged prothrombin time early after operation predict the 90 days morbidity and mortality in living-donor liver transplantation Prognostic value of prothrombin time international normalized ratio in acute decompensated heart failure-a combined marker of hepatic insufficiency and hemostatic abnormality Clinical and prognostic significance of coagulation assays in lung cancer Clinical use of the activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time for screening: A review of the literature and current guidelines for testing Quantitation of activated factor VII levels in plasma using a tissue factor mutant selectively deficient in promoting factor VII activation Hypercoagulability of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit: A report of thromboelastography findings and other parameters of hemostasis A shortened activated partial thromboplastin time is associated with the risk of venous thromboembolism Effects of acute liver injury on blood coagulation COVID-19 and the liver: Little cause for concern COVID-19, MERS and SARS with concomitant liver injury-systematic review of the existing literature Disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 Dysregulation of inflammatory and hemostatic markers in sepsis and suspected disseminated intravascular coagulation High frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in Critically-ill COVID-19 Patients: A link with hypercoagulability? Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with Covid-19 COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis of literature studies COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism: Current insights and prophylactic strategies Covid-19 and physical and rehabilitation medicine Rehabilitation of COVID-19 patients Sequelae of acute respiratory distress syndrome: Interest of rehabilitation. Case Rep Rehabilitation following critical illness in people with COVID-19 infection Flattening the disability curve: Rehabilitation and recovery after COVID-19 infection COVID-19 guide for the rehabilitation clinician: A review of non-pulmonary manifestations and complications Pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19: A call to arms? COVID-19 and coagulative axis: Review of emerging aspects in a novel disease. Monaldi Arch Which is more generalizable, powerful and interpretable in meta-analyses, mean difference or standardized mean difference? This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license Acknowledgments: Nothing to report. The authors declare no conflict of interest.