key: cord-0998254-pkx3ebwv
authors: Kerstis, Birgitta; Giannotta, Fabrizia; Wågert, Petra von Heideken; Hellström, Charlotta; Lindberg, Daniel; Stier, Jonas; Elvén, Maria
title: Changes in Mental Health and Views on Communication and Activities of Public Institutions among Swedes during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Cross-Sectional Repeated Measures Design
date: 2021-11-03
journal: Healthcare (Basel)
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9111498
sha: 53370dbdc3e6ac10bc66e55dec0609fdf23105b8
doc_id: 998254
cord_uid: pkx3ebwv

Although many studies have been conducted on the effects of COVID-19 on individual lives, only a few focus on the changes in mental health and views of public institutions during the pandemic. This study aimed to investigate how mental health, i.e., life satisfaction, worries, and psychological distress, and views on public institutions’ communication and activities have changed among Swedes during the COVID-19 pandemic, and whether this was moderated by age and sex. In April–May 2020 (survey 1) and in January–February 2021 (survey 2), 2554 adults and 1904 newly recruited adults, respectively, anonymously completed online surveys. We found that life satisfaction and psychological distress did not change from survey 1 to survey 2. However, the level of worries increased, and the positive views of the public institutions decreased. Moreover, worries and psychological distress increased more in young adults than older adults. Finally, the change in the views of the public institutions was not related to the change in worries. Our results highlight the COVID-19 long-term impacts on individual mental health and call for the need for future research concerning the consequences for the population, especially among young adults. The results also indicate that the views on activities of public authorities decreased over time, especially among men. Given that loss of this trust can have vastly negative effects, for instance, on the vaccine campaign, it is important to monitor this trend, to increase awareness among Swedish authorities. The results also stress for institutions to provide adequate support both during the COVID-19 pandemic and in a future crisis.

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) as a global pandemic in March 2020. Individuals of all ages have experienced, to a different extent, negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. For instance, even though young adults have not suffered much from the lethality of the virus [1] , preventive measures, such as the closing of universities and restrained social contacts, in conjunction with a deteriorated economic situation in many countries, including Sweden [2] , are likely to negatively impact their mental health. Moreover, as many adults and children are working and studying from home, there can be an increased risk of strained relationships and conflicts [3] . COVID-19 also has negative consequences for the oldest population, as they are the group more at risk to die from the virus [4] , and their social life has been dramatically changed because of the pandemic. For instance, in Sweden, where this study Healthcare 2021, 9, 1498 2 of 10 took place, measures, such as the shutdown of community organizations, dramatically limit the social interactions of the older population (70 years and older) [5] . In addition, the lack of digital literacy among many of them (especially in the group 76 years and older) might have compromised both the access to public information [6] and the maintenance of a social life, for instance, through the internet. To sum up, in one way or another, the pandemic is likely to negatively impact the life and the wellbeing of all individuals, and not only due to its medical-related effects. Therefore, it is important to investigate all the possible negative consequences of COVID-19 to plan preventive measures to contrast the pandemic's negative effects.

While many studies have highlighted an increase in mental health problems, especially in women and young adults during the beginning of the pandemic [7] , studies that follow up the effects of the pandemic in later stages are still scarce. Among the few, a longitudinal study from the UK described an overall increase in mental distress in a cohort aged 16 years and older in April 2020, measured before and during COVID-19 [8] . Conversely, a study from the US revealed a decrease in psychological distress in the general population from April-June 2020 to March-April 2021 [9] . These contrasting results call for further investigation on the short-as well as long-term effects of the pandemic on the mental health of the individuals, especially as measures in Sweden were different than those used in many parts of the world.

In Sweden, preventive measures combating the COVID-19 contagion have been mostly based on voluntary and stepwise actions [10] instead of legislation and compulsory measures, including lockdowns, as in many countries. One of the rationales for this approach is that Swedish society is built on mutual trust and individual responsibility [11] . During a crisis, trust both between people and between people and the government is a key factor [12] . Therefore, a decrease in this trust might be particularly deleterious. Nevertheless, the higher number of deaths in Sweden compared with other Scandinavian countries that implemented lockdown strategies [13] might have influenced the populations' views on public institutions. As the Swedish approach to the pandemic partly depends on the trust toward the communication and activities of public institutions, it is important to investigate whether and how the people's views regarding this have changed over the year affected by the pandemic.

A relationship between information about COVID-19 and anxiety and stress symptoms [14] has been found. A Spanish study pointed out that having reliable and correct information decreased anxiety [15] . However, a decrease in trust toward the public institutions can also affect individual mental health with increasing worries and psychological distress [16] . Therefore, there is a need to investigate, in relation to age and sex, whether and to what extent individual mental health has changed and whether this was related to a change in trust towards the public institutions.

The consequences of the pandemic seem to affect population mental health in different ways, depending on age and sex [17] . Studies during the beginning of COVID-19 demonstrate that women and young people seem to be more affected in terms of mental health compared with men and other age groups [18, 19] . However, it is unclear if these differences are persisting. Hence, there are reasons to explore if and how the pandemic has impacted different age groups and sexes concerning both mental health and trust toward public institutions.

In this study, we focus on some aspects that can indicate good mental health, such as good life satisfaction, low worries, and psychological distress [20] .

To sum up, the present study aims to explore whether:

(1) Mental health, i.e., life satisfaction, worries, and psychological distress, and views on communication and activities of public institutions have changed among Swedes during the pandemic; (2) This change is moderated by age and sex;

(3) Changes in the views on communication and activities of public institutions are related to changes in mental health.

The study used a descriptive cross-sectional repeated measures design and was part of a World Values Survey 3-measure "Values in Crisis" survey, studying peoples' values during the COVID-19 pandemic [21] .

The first survey, hereafter named survey 1, was conducted in April-May 2020, and the second survey, hereafter named survey 2, was conducted in February-March 2021. A total of 40,000 potential participants, randomly recruited from the Swedish population between 18 and 79 years of age, were available through a survey management service. Of these 40,000, a stratified sample of 4561 representing the Swedish population were contacted and asked in survey 1. Of these 4561, 2554 participants anonymously completed the first online survey, yielding a 56% response rate. During survey 2, among the same 40,000 potential participants, 2539 were newly recruited anonymously. Of these 2539, 1904 completed the online survey, yielding a 75% response rate. The study participants were introduced to the purpose of the study and provided with an information letter and a link to a self-administered 20 min online questionnaire, including a total number of 150 items, of which x items were analyzed in the current study. The participants were informed that they consented to be included in the study by answering the web-based questionnaire, for which they received a cinema ticket. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [22] and Swedish law [23] . All personal data connections were deleted after the material was collected and were not accessible to the researchers in the present study.

The participants self-estimated their life satisfaction with the question: All things considered, how satisfied are you these days with your: (1) Health condition, (2) Financial situation, (3) Social relations, (4) Work-life balance, and (5) Life as a whole under the given circumstances (i.e., . The response options ranged from Completely dissatisfied (1) to Completely satisfied (10) . An index of life satisfaction was developed where high values indicated high satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha was 0.84 in survey 1 and 0.85 in survey 2.

The participants self-estimated: How do you rate your concern regarding the current Corona outbreak? How worried are you about: (1) Getting the virus; (2) Risk to infect others without knowing; (3) Need to change lifestyle for good, and (4) That the health care system does not have enough resources. The response options ranged from Very worried (1) to Not at all worried (5), with a maximum score of 20. The items were reversed, and an index was developed where high values indicated higher worries related to COVID-19. Cronbach's alpha was 0.62 in survey 1 and 0.64 in survey 2.

The participants self-estimated: Over the last two weeks, how often have you been bothered by the following problems: (1) Feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge, (2) Not being able to stop or control worrying, (3) Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless, (4) Little interest or pleasure in doing things, and (5) I have felt lonely. The response options ranged from Not at all (1) to Nearly every day (4) . The items were combined in an index where higher scores indicated a higher level of psychological distress. Cronbach's alpha was 0.84 in survey 1 and 0.86 in survey 2. 

The participants self-estimated: How do you view the following activities and communication concerning the COVID-19 outbreak concerning seven public institutions (i.e., the health care service, the municipality, the National Board of Health and Welfare, the politicians, the public health agency, the public media, and the Swedish agency for social protection and preparedness). The response options ranged from Very good (1), Good (2), Bad (3), Very bad (4), to Don't know (5) . The response option Don't know was treated as missing. The items were reversed, and an index was developed where higher values indicated a positive view. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 in survey 1 and 0.88 in survey 2.

Descriptive statistics were presented using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and means and standard deviations for continuous variables. To investigate the changes in life satisfaction, worries, psychological distress, and views on public institutions' communication and activities related to COVID-19, t-tests for independent samples were used.

To test the moderation hypothesis, we used a series of multiple linear regression models where survey number, age, sex, and the interaction terms were entered as independent variables [24] . In all the models, age was centered to reduce collinearity problems. Finally, to test whether a change in views on public institutions' communication and activities was related to a change in mental health, a multiple regression model was applied, entering survey number and views on public institutions' communication and activities and the interaction between those two as independent variables, after centering public institutions' communication to reduce multicollinearity. All the variables that were treated as continuous hold an acceptable level of skewness and kurtosis. All tests were two tailed, and the statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26.0; IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA).

The socio-demographic characteristics for the sample in its entirety and for the two surveys are presented in Table 1 . The mean age of the whole population was 51.2 years (SD = 16.9); in survey 1, it was 49.3 years (SD = 17.1), and in survey 2, it was 52.4 years (SD = 16.6). The whole sample included 52.5% women; in survey 1, 52.0% were women, while in survey 2, 53.1% were women. The two samples were comparable and differ only by age and occupation rate (Table 1) .

There were no differences in mean levels of life satisfaction and psychological distress. The level of worries increased and the views on public institutions' communication became less positive in survey 2 compared with survey 1 ( Table 2) .

Life satisfaction did not change between the surveys and was not affected by sex or the interaction between age and sex. Older age predicted better life satisfaction. The level of worries increased from survey 1 to survey 2. Being women and older adults predicted higher levels of worries. Sex did not moderate the increase in worries while age did. The increase in levels of worries was higher in the young adults compared to the older age groups (Table 3 and Figure 1 ). Psychological distress did not change between the surveys and was not affected by age or sex (Table 3) . However, an interaction effect with age was found. Specifically, psychological distress increased from survey 1 to survey 2, but only in young adults (Table 3 and Figure 2 ). The views on public institutions' communication and activities became more negative from survey 1 to survey 2 and were predicted by age and sex. Being women and older adults predicted a more positive view of the public institutions. Finally, when it comes to the change between survey 1 and survey 2 (Table 3) , the decrease in positive views of the public institutions did not differ between young and older adults, while positive views of the public institutions decreased more in men than women (Table 3 and Figure 3 ). The views on public institutions' communication and activities became more negative from survey 1 to survey 2 and were predicted by age and sex. Being women and older adults predicted a more positive view of the public institutions. Finally, when it comes to the change between survey 1 and survey 2 (Table 3) , the decrease in positive views of the public institutions did not differ between young and older adults, while positive views of the public institutions decreased more in men than women (Table 3 and Figure 3 ).

Interactions between the number of surveys and age predicting psychological distress.

The views on public institutions' communication and activities became more negative from survey 1 to survey 2 and were predicted by age and sex. Being women and older adults predicted a more positive view of the public institutions. Finally, when it comes to the change between survey 1 and survey 2 (Table 3) , the decrease in positive views of the public institutions did not differ between young and older adults, while positive views of the public institutions decreased more in men than women (Table 3 and Figure 3 ). 

We used a multiple regression model with an interaction term (measure*views on public institutions' activities) to investigate whether the change in the views of public institutions was related to the change in worries (F (3; 4323) = 18.14, p < 0.001). However, the changes in worries were not related to the change in the public view of public institutions (β = −0.039, p = 0.45).

This study investigated how and whether mental health and views on communication and activities of public institutions changed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden, and whether this change was moderated by age and sex. Our results indicate that the average levels of life satisfaction and psychological distress were not affected by the pandemic and did not change from survey 1 to survey 2. However, there was an increase in worries about the pandemic and a decrease in the trust in public institutions' communication and activities. This may suggest that, at the beginning of the pandemic, the Swedes judged that the pandemic was going to be only for a short time, and it was hard to predict its difficult long-term consequences. About nine months later, when survey 2 was conducted, the consequences of the pandemic were part of many people's daily life, affecting their worries.

When it comes to the views on public institutions' communication and activities, we observed a general decrease in positive attitudes toward activities and communication from the public institution for all populations. This change was even more accentuated in men compared with women. This is in contrast with another study that described an increase in trust towards the public institutions during the first outbreak in Sweden [25] . Swedes, in general, have a high level of confidence and trust in the government and authorities [26] . In addition, the Swedish government has adhered to recommendations rather than regulations [11] , especially during the first months of the pandemic. This might Healthcare 2021, 9, 1498 8 of 10 have influenced the views of the institutions at the beginning. However, the tightening of the restrictions to contrast the pandemic during survey 2 and the change in the socalled Swedish strategy might have affected the opinion of the population regarding the activities of the government. Nevertheless, the changes were not associated with the change in individual mental health, i.e., worries; therefore, we cannot establish that the restrictions decided by governments are the critical factor in explaining increased worry or mental distress in general. However, the change of trust in institutions might have other consequences for the population. For instance, a recent study describes a link between trust in public institutions and the adoption of the recommended preventive measures to contrast the spread of the virus [27] . Therefore, the consequences of a change in views of the public institutions need to be explored further.

The second aim was to investigate the role of sex and age in moderating the change in mental health and views on the communication of the institutions from survey 1 to survey 2. We found that sex moderated only the effects on views of the public institutions, making the decrease in positive views even worse for men than women. However, age also showed a stronger moderating effect. The young adults had the highest increase in worries. Moreover, their psychological distress was increased while the other age groups were stable. This indicates that young adults might have a stronger impact on mental health compared with other age groups. This is consistent with studies describing that young people's mental health was negatively affected during COVID-19, during the first outbreak of the pandemic [18, 19] . This study adds that this deterioration of mental health persists nine months later, suggesting that it might become a phenomenon of concern.

The reasons why young adults seem to be more psychologically affected by the pandemic are still unknown. However, there are some hypotheses. In Sweden, the restrictions were few during the first months but became stricter during autumn 2020, which might have especially affected young adults, as bars and restaurant opening hours were limited. Furthermore, for young adults, the pandemic has made access to professional and friend support more difficult [28] . In addition, the lockdown of universities has affected young adults' education and work opportunities as well as possibilities to gain life experiences [29] . All these changes might have affected the mental health of young adults. Further studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses.

A strength of the present research was that it was possible to examine the role played by a range of mediating factors have had in explaining longitudinal changes in distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among a large portion of the population.

This study has some weaknesses. Although the relatively large population implies good statistical power, some limitations should be acknowledged. First, the cross-sectional design with two different samples precludes assumptions about temporality or causality. Moreover, the psychological distress measure was not directly referred to COVID-19, and there is no information about the participants' status before the pandemic. Therefore, we cannot exclude that the most psychologically distressed people were already so before the pandemic. Another limitation is the high no-response rate, especially during survey 1; it could be that the people not answering are the ones suffering the most with personal consequences. Furthermore, well-educated people and women were overrepresented in the sample. All these effects might affect the representativeness of the sample. Nevertheless, this no-response rate of our study is quite in line with most population studies. Moreover, the internal reliability of the worries measure was relatively low but still acceptable Finally, the results of the present study might not be generalizable to other countries, populations, or age groups, although the use of a relatively large sample from the general population allows for broad generalizability to similar contexts. Therefore, longitudinal studies following a cohort and with a more representative sample are needed.

This study has some strengths too. The most important one is that this is one of the few studies to investigate the changes in both mental health and views of the public institutions Healthcare 2021, 9, 1498 9 of 10 during COVID-19, using a population sample that ensures statistical power and makes the results reliable.

Many studies have been conducted during COVID-19, but only a few focus on changes in mental health and views of public authorities during the pandemic. Moreover, our study highlighted that age, especially, but also gender, affected these changes. Given the negative impact of the pandemic on young adults' mental health which emerged from our study, we conclude that it is especially important to promote mental health among young adults as they will work and serve our society for many years, hopefully with good health and trust in public institutions. The results also indicate that the views on activities of public authorities decreased over time, especially among men. Given that loss of this trust can have vastly negative effects, for instance, on the vaccine campaign, it is important to monitor this trend, to increase awareness among Swedish authorities. The results also stress for institutions to provide adequate support both during the COVID-19 pandemic and in a future crisis.

Medical vulnerability of young adults to severe COVID-19 illness-data from the National Health Interview Survey

GDP Development in Sweden Relative to the Rest of the World in the Wake of Covid-19

Domestic violence, and substance abuse during COVID19: A systematic review

COVID-19 mortality risk factors in older people in a long-term care center

Impact of social isolation due to COVID-19 on health in older people: Mental and physical effects and recommendations

The Swedes and the Internet. Available online

Mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: A review and recommendations for moving forward

Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population

Explaining the rise and fall of psychological distress during the COVID-19 crisis in the United States: Longitudinal evidence from the Understanding America Study

Misinformation and de-contextualization: International media reporting on Sweden and COVID-19

Swedish policy analysis for Covid-19

COVID-19: Large-scale collective action, government intervention, and the importance of trust

Possible Factors for Sweden's High Covid Death Rate among the Nordics

Americans' COVID-19 stress, coping, and adherence to CDC guidelines

Mental health consequences during the initial stage of the 2020 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain

Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: Relationships to trust and compliance with preventive surveys across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review

Mental health during COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom

Worry and mental health in the Covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability factors in the general Norwegian population

World Values Survey: Round Seven-Country-Pooled Datafile

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

Good Research Practice

Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures

How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: Evidence from 'the Swedish experiment'

The state and consumer confidence in eco-labeling: Organic labeling in Denmark, Sweden, The United Kingdom and The United States

Avoiding a public health dilemma: Social norms and trust facilitate preventive behaviour if individuals perceive low COVID-19 health risks

Impact on Young People with Mental Health Needs

Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens

We would like to thank Novus for collecting and compiling the data and the COVID-19 panel 2020-2021 in Sweden. We would also like to extend our gratitude to the study participants for completing the surveys.

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Participants received written information about the study and that they could withdraw at any time. Participants gave their consent to the study by answering the survey.

The study did not report any data.