key: cord-0997792-io1ms5gd
authors: Barroso, Ricardo; Vieira-Pires, Alexandre; Antunes, Agostinho; Fidalgo-Carvalho, Isabel
title: Susceptibility of Pets to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Lessons from a Seroepidemiologic Survey of Cats and Dogs in Portugal
date: 2022-02-02
journal: Microorganisms
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10020345
sha: 191497f935b845969be3287d48376bc69d61871e
doc_id: 997792
cord_uid: io1ms5gd

Betacoronavirus (β-CoV) are positive single-stranded RNA viruses known to infect mammals. In 2019, a novel zoonotic β-CoV emerged, the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2. Although the most frequent SARS-CoV-2 transmission route is within humans, spillover from humans to domestic and wild animals has been reported, including cats (Felis catus), dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), and minks (Neovision vision). In order to understand the potential role of domestic animals in SARS-CoV-2 global transmission, as well their susceptibility to infection, a seroepidemiologic survey of cats and dogs in Portugal was conducted. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 15/69 (21.74%) cats and 7/148 (4.73%) dogs. Of the SARS-CoV-2 seropositive animals, 11/22 (50.00%) were possibly infected by human-to-animal transmission, and 5/15 (33.33%) cats were probably infected by cat-to-cat transmission. Moreover, one dog tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Data suggest that cats and dogs are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection in natural conditions. Hence, a one-health approach is crucial in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to understand the risk factors beyond infection in a human–animal environment interface.

In December 2019, an outbreak of atypical pneumonia of unknown etiology was detected in the city of Wuhan, located at the Chinese province of Hubei [1] . The outbreak was caused by a novel betacoronavirus (β-CoV), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2, responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 in humans [2] . The disease is assumed to be a viral zoonosis, as CoVs recovered from bats [3] and pangolins [4] [5] [6] [7] show high genome identity with SARS-CoV-2.

As with all RNA viruses, SARS-CoV-2 is able to adapt to novel hosts via random genomic mutations subjected to natural selection, as mutants with higher host tropism within the quasispecies memory may be manifested during interspecies viral transmission [8] . Hence, although SARS-CoV-2 mainly circulates in the human population, surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal species is crucial for a better understanding viral adaptation, evolution, and transmission on a wider scale.

Cats and dogs have been exposed to SARS-CoV-2, involving the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in respiratory and/or fecal specimens [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] , as well as specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] . According to experimental studies, dogs have little susceptibility to infection [29, 30] in contrast with cats, who exhibited higher viral shedding, respiratory pathology, and efficient transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within cats by respiratory droplets [29] [30] [31] [32] . Consequently, several questions arise about the role of pets in SARS-CoV-2 transmission and if they could become novel reservoirs of infection by reverse zoonosis due to prolonged contact with humans.

Here, we report a seroepidemiologic survey in Portugal from December 2020 to May 2021 on cats and dogs from a one health perspective that demonstrates the susceptibility of these pets to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

All animals were sampled in 15 veterinarian clinicals, hospitals, and animal shelters across distinct regions of Portugal (northern, central, and south regions). Full signalment and clinical history from each animal were collected through epidemiological enquiries, including sex, age, weight, breed, geographic region, and clinical signs (asymptomatic, fever, respiratory, digestive, neurological, and others), as well as pet exposure to Pets in close contact with infected humans with a positive PCR result in a previous twoweek COVID-19-positive household; pets in a COVID-19-negative household; pets in a COVID-19-suspected household; and pets' exposure to outdoors. Informed consent was filled and signed by owners and/or veterinarians to collect animal data, blood samples, and swabs. Blood samples were collected in dry biochemical tubes or 2-mL microtubes without anticoagulant. Whenever possible, when seropositive or borderline results were observed, an additional sample was collected to address the duration of antibody responses in pets. For serum separation, the tubes were centrifugated at 500 rcf for 10 min and the supernatant was transferred to a clean 2-mL microtube. All swabs (oropharyngeal, nasal, and rectal) were collected by synthetic fiber swabs and immersed in 1.5 mL of viral transport medium. Sera and swabs were stored at −80 • C until processing.

A total of 225 blood samples were collected from 217 pets (221 blood samples between 4 December 2020 and 8 May 2021 and four extra dog blood samples in June 2020), comprising a total of 148 dogs and 69 cats surveyed. Additional samples were collected from five dogs and three cats, totaling 72 cat and 153 dog blood samples. Oropharyngeal, nasal, and rectal swabs were collected from four dogs, with only nasal and rectal swabs collected from one cat. All cats (69/69) included in the survey lived in households. The surveyed dog population included 122 dogs from households and 26 from shelters (20 lived in close contact in parks, while 6 lived in individual cages). The data from pets signalment is present in supplementary information ( Figure A1 ).

The survey was performed in five districts of Portugal: Braga, Porto, Aveiro, Coimbra, and Lisbon. From the surveyed animals, 110 dogs and 56 cats were from the Braga district; 16 dogs and 9 cats were from the Porto district; 2 dogs were from the Aveiro district; 7 dogs were from the Coimbra district, and 13 dogs and 4 cats were from the Lisbon district. Most pet samples were collected at the Braga district (n = 166), mainly in the regions of Vila Nova de Famalicão (n = 83) and Guimarães (n = 71), followed by the Porto district (n = 26) ( Figure 1 ). portion of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and nucleocapsid (N) genes being amplified by RT-qPCR using the SARS-CoV-2 one step RT-qPCR kit (Nzytech) under the following cycling conditions: 50 °C for 20 min, 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. A small fragment of the spike (S) gene was also amplified by one step RT-qPCR using the following primers: S69d-F (ACA ACC ABA ACR CAA TTA CCC CC) and S69d-Rev (ACT CTG AAC TCA CTT TCC ATC CAA C) and sequenced by Sanger. Partial S sequences were analyzed by Clustal W by Dynamo software. 

Detection of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 RBD was accomplished by two ELISAs, each adapted for each species. The ELISA plate was coated with a recombinant RBD protein, diluted in phosphate-buffered saline with Tween ® detergent (PBST) and blocked using bovine serum albumin (BSA). All sera, including positive and negative controls, were screened at a dilution of 1:100 using a goat anti-cat or anti-dog IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as a secondary antibody. The reactions ended with the addition of the HRP-substrate 3,3′,5,5′ Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), followed by the 0. 

RNA extraction was performed using the Trizol LS reagent (Invitrogen) in 2-mL eppendorf DNA LoBind tubes according to the manufacturer instructions, with the portion of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and nucleocapsid (N) genes being amplified by RT-qPCR using the SARS-CoV-2 one step RT-qPCR kit (Nzytech) under the following cycling conditions: 50 • C for 20 min, 95 • C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 95 • C for 5 s, and 60 • C for 30 s. A small fragment of the spike (S) gene was also amplified by one step RT-qPCR using the following primers: S69d-F (ACA ACC ABA ACR CAA TTA CCC CC) and S69d-Rev (ACT CTG AAC TCA CTT TCC ATC CAA C) and sequenced by Sanger. Partial S sequences were analyzed by Clustal W by Dynamo software.

Detection of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 RBD was accomplished by two ELISAs, each adapted for each species. The ELISA plate was coated with a recombinant RBD protein, diluted in phosphate-buffered saline with Tween ® detergent (PBST) and blocked using bovine serum albumin (BSA). All sera, including positive and negative controls, were screened at a dilution of 1:100 using a goat anti-cat or anti-dog IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as a secondary antibody. The reactions ended with the addition of the HRP-substrate 3,3 ,5,5 Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), followed by the 0.2 H 2 SO 4 stop solution, resulting in switching from a blue color to yellow measurable signs. All the steps were separated by washes in a Wellwash ® Microplate Washer. The optical densities (ODs) were measured at 450 mm. The cutoff values were determined at three and five times the OD medium value of reactivity of seronegative samples from a pre-COVID-19 cohort. The test was considered valid if the quotient between the positive and negative control was above five.

Data obtained from the epidemiologic surveys and results from the serologic analyses were registered in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, followed by the calculation of seroprevalences. Graph Pad Prism 8.0.1 was used for graphic construction and statistical analyses. Comparison between groups was performed using Fisher's exact and Chi-squared tests. Significance was accepted when p < 0.05.

Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 22 

Of the seropositive cats, 7/15 (46.67%) lived in COVID-19-positive households, 2/15 (13.33%) had contact with non-tested cats belonging to neighbors that were positive with COVID-19, 2/15 (13.33%) lived in the same COVID-19-negative household, and 1/15 (6.67%) lived with other non-tested cats in the same household. Of the seropositive dogs, 4/7 (57.14%) lived in COVID-19-positive households (Table 1) . Cats were significantly more likely to test seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 if they had contact with COVID-19-positive human cases (Qui square test, p < 0.01), as well as dogs (Qui square test, p < 0.05) ( Table 2 ). 

From the seropositive pets, 7/15 (46.67%) cats and 6/7 (85.71%) dogs had contact with the outdoors (Table 1) , but no significative differences were found regarding outdoor contact (Qui square test, p > 0.05) for both species in terms of infection (Table 2) . Dogs belonging to animal shelters, 0/25 (0.00%), were seronegative to SARS-CoV-2.

From seropositive cats, 6/15 (40.00%) were males and 9/15 (60.00%) were females, with 0/15 (0.00%) aged < 1, 6/15 (40.00%) aged 1-3, 5/15 (33.33%) aged 4-7, and 4/15 (26.67%) aged +8 years. From the seropositive dogs, 3/7 (40.00%) were males and 4/7 (60.00%) were females, with 0/0 (0.00%) aged < 1, 1/7 (14.29%) aged 1-3, 2/7 (28.57%) aged 4-7, and 3/7 (42.86%) aged +8 years (1/7 (14.29%) of unknown age) ( Table 1) . None of the surveyed kittens or puppies aged less than one year (n = 9) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and no significative differences were found regarding sex (Fisher exact test, p > 0.05) or age (Qui square test, p > 0.05) in terms of infection ( Table 2 ).

A total of 9/15 (60.00%) seropositive cats exhibited clinical signs, experiencing more than one of the following: 4/9 (44.44%) had respiratory signs, 2/9 (22.22%) had neurologic signs, 3/9 (33.33%) had digestive signs, 2/9 (22.22%) had apathy and appetite reduction, and 1/9 (11.11%) had fever. Additionally, 1/15 (6.67%) were co-infected with FIV. From these seropositive cats, 10/15 (66.67%) recovered from the clinical signs, while 5/15 (33.33%) were euthanized or succumbed to death. From the seropositive dogs, only 1/7 (14.29%) were symptomatic, exhibiting digestive signs (Table 1) .

In five animals, swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing by RT-qPCR (four dogs and one cat) were available. Of these, only one asymptomatic dog tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA seven days after the owner's positive result was known, with a Ct value of 20.12 in a pool of three swabs (nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and rectal swabs). The dog continued to shed the virus six days after the first swab, remaining positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA with a Ct value of 31.57 for the oropharyngeal swab (positive), 28.71 for the nasal swab (positive), and >40 from the rectal swab (negative). The SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive dog was seronegative in the first blood sample, which coincided with the collection of positive swabs samples. However, after 16 days, antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were already detected in a second blood sample ( Figure 2 ).

In three of the seropositive animals, a second blood sampling was taken to investigate the longevity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. One cat was seronegative for SARS-CoV-2 three months after testing seropositive, one dog was seronegative after one month, and one dog was seronegative after nine months. seronegative in the first blood sample, which coincided with the collection of positive swabs samples. However, after 16 days, antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were already detected in a second blood sample (Figure 2 ).

In three of the seropositive animals, a second blood sampling was taken to investigate the longevity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. One cat was seronegative for SARS-CoV-2 three months after testing seropositive, one dog was seronegative after one month, and one dog was seronegative after nine months. 

A short fragment of the SARS-CoV-2 S gene was obtained by Sanger sequencing and deposited at the GISAID database under acession number EPI_ISL_1220542. The Clustal W analysis showed that the partial S sequence obtained from the dog was similar to the Alpha strain containing the H69del, V70del, and Y145del mutations (Figure 3 ). 

A short fragment of the SARS-CoV-2 S gene was obtained by Sanger sequencing and deposited at the GISAID database under acession number EPI_ISL_1220542. The Clustal W analysis showed that the partial S sequence obtained from the dog was similar to the Alpha strain containing the H69del, V70del, and Y145del mutations (Figure 3) . 

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, questions have remained about the susceptibility of animal species to SARS-CoV-2 infection under natural conditions and their potential role in viral transmission, as it is assumed as a viral zoonosis. Although diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is focused on humans, various molecular and serological assays were adapted to access SARS-CoV-2 infection in animals. Reports of SARS-CoV-2 infection were detected in domestic cats (F. catus) [10] [11] [12] [13] , dogs (C. l. familiaris) [9] , and ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) [33] , by closer contact with infected owners, as well in captivated animals, including minks (N. vision) [34] , lions (Panthera leo), tigers (P. tigris) [33] , and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) [35] , by closer contact with infected workers (Figure 4) , confirming that viral spillover from humans to animals may be more common than expected. Viral spillover from animals to humans was only reported in mink farms [34] , as mink-specific variants were developed due to rapid viral evolution and adaptation to animal hosts. Moreover, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) [36] and minks (N. vison) [37] were 

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, questions have remained about the susceptibility of animal species to SARS-CoV-2 infection under natural conditions and their potential role in viral transmission, as it is assumed as a viral zoonosis. Although diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is focused on humans, various molecular and serological assays were adapted to access SARS-CoV-2 infection in animals. Reports of SARS-CoV-2 infection were detected in domestic cats (F. catus) [10] [11] [12] [13] , dogs (C. l. familiaris) [9] , and ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) [33] , by closer contact with infected owners, as well in captivated animals, including minks (N. vision) [34] , lions (Panthera leo), tigers (P. tigris) [33] , and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) [35] , by closer contact with infected workers (Figure 4) , confirming that viral spillover from humans to animals may be more common than expected. Viral spillover from animals to humans was only reported in mink farms [34] , as mink-specific variants were developed due to rapid viral evolution and adaptation to animal hosts. Moreover, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) [36] and minks (N. vison) [37] were found to be exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the wild (Figure 4) , creating potential new reservoirs of the virus. 

Among the different animal species, cats and dogs may be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 for several reasons: (i) They are in close contact with humans; (ii) they are susceptible to other coronavirus infections, such as alphacoronavirus (α-CoV) (Feline CoV and Canine CoV) and β-CoV (Canine Respiratory CoV) infection [48, 49] ; and (iii) they are known to be susceptible to natural [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] and experimental [29] [30] [31] [32] SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, cats were reported to be not only susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection [50] , but also capable of effectively transmitting SARS-CoV-2 through close contact between infected and naïve cats [29] [30] [31] [32] 50] . Henceforth, a one health approach to the current COVID-19 pandemic is important to better understand the risk factors at the humananimal environment interface. Thus, in the context of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, testing of dogs and cats in COVID-19 households could be important not only to ensure animal health and prevent viral evolution/adaptation within pets, but also to better assess the risk factors of the potential establishment of animal reservoirs and/or potential environmental contamination with SARS-CoV-2.

In this wide-scale seroepidemiologic study, a total of 22/217 (10.14%) pets were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2, including 15/69 (21.74%) cats and 7/148 (4.73%) dogs, proving that both species were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and are susceptible to infection. The seropositivity reported here was higher than the seropositivity rates recorded in humans in Portugal between May and June 2020 (2.9%) [51] , demonstrating that pets are being infected with SARS-CoV-2 at considerable rates. However, the survey in humans was accomplished in the first months of the pandemic, where the incidence of infection was considerably lower than the incidence during the present study, which was Furthermore, experimental infections were reported that confirmed the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and viral transmission in a wide range of animal species. Different species revealed varying levels of clinical outcomes and viral shedding, including domestic cats (F. catus) [29] [30] [31] [32] , dogs (C. l. familiaris) [29, 30] , ferrets (M. p. furo) [29, [38] [39] [40] , transgenic mice (Mus musculus) [41] , Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) [40] , racoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) [42] , Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) [38] , Chinese tree shrews (Tupaia belangeris) [43] , white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) [44] , rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) [45] , and cynomolgus macaques (M. fascicularis) (Figure 3 ) [46] , with some being resistant to infection, such as cattle (Bos taurus) [47] , chickens, ducks, and pigs [29, 38] .

Previous reported data suggest that several animals are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection in natural and experimental conditions.

Among the different animal species, cats and dogs may be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 for several reasons: (i) They are in close contact with humans; (ii) they are susceptible to other coronavirus infections, such as alphacoronavirus (α-CoV) (Feline CoV and Canine CoV) and β-CoV (Canine Respiratory CoV) infection [48, 49] ; and (iii) they are known to be susceptible to natural [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] and experimental [29] [30] [31] [32] SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, cats were reported to be not only susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection [50] , but also capable of effectively transmitting SARS-CoV-2 through close contact between infected and naïve cats [29] [30] [31] [32] 50] . Henceforth, a one health approach to the current COVID-19 pandemic is important to better understand the risk factors at the human-animal environment interface. Thus, in the context of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, testing of dogs and cats in COVID-19 households could be important not only to ensure animal health and prevent viral evolution/adaptation within pets, but also to better assess the risk factors of the potential establishment of animal reservoirs and/or potential environmental contamination with SARS-CoV-2.

In this wide-scale seroepidemiologic study, a total of 22/217 (10.14%) pets were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2, including 15/69 (21.74%) cats and 7/148 (4.73%) dogs, proving that both species were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and are susceptible to infection. The seropositivity reported here was higher than the seropositivity rates recorded in humans in Portugal between May and June 2020 (2.9%) [51] , demonstrating that pets are being infected with SARS-CoV-2 at considerable rates. However, the survey in humans was accomplished in the first months of the pandemic, where the incidence of infection was considerably lower than the incidence during the present study, which was conducted December 2020 to May 2021, coincident with the third COVID-19 wave [52] .

Cats were significantly more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection when compared to dogs (Fisher exact test, p < 0.001), confirming experimental studies that have highlighted cats as being more predisposed to infection [29] [30] [31] [32] . Previous wide-scale studies supported the same findings, with cats displaying a higher SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence. In Wuhan, China, 15/102 (14.70%) cats and 16/946 (1.69%) dogs were seropositive to SARS-CoV-2 [14, 23] . In Italy, 11/191 (5.8%) cats and 15/451 (3.3%) dogs were seropositive to SARS-CoV-2 [25] . In Texas, USA, 41.2% of 17 cats and 11.9% of 59 dogs had detectable neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 [27] .

Furthermore, here we reported that cats living in COVID-19-negative households and with outdoor access were also found to be seropositive. Two cats from a COVID-19-negative household and one cat living with various non-tested cats from a COVID-19-negative household were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as two cats who had contact with various non-tested cats belonging to neighbours who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The results suggest that cat-to-cat transmission is possible and may be more common than expected in natural settings, being consistent with experimental studies [29] [30] [31] [32] , where cat-to-cat transmission occurred.

No correlation was found between SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and sex (Fisher exact test, p > 0.05), age (Qui Square test, p > 0.05), or contact with the outdoors (Qui Square test, p > 0.05) for both species. None of the seven kittens and two puppies (aged < 1 year) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that adult cats and dogs are more prone to infection. Patterson et al. also demonstrated that none of the 9 kittens and 20 puppies tested were infected by SARS-CoV-2 [25] , revealing that younger pets may be less likely to be infected.

However, both cats (Qui square test, p < 0.01) and dogs (Qui square test, p < 0.05) were more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection if they had contact with COVID-19-positive human cases. In surveys conducted in Wuhan, the highest neutralization titers were observed in cats and dogs from COVID-19-positive households [14, 23] , revealing that pets are at a higher risk when in close proximity to infected owners. In addition, Fritz et al. also reported a higher seroprevalence in animals from COVID-19-positive households (21% to 53%, depending on the positivity criteria chosen), and infection was not associated with the number of pets in the households [28] , suggesting that the main source of SARS-CoV-2 infection resides in pet owners.

In this study, one dog was shown to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 seven days after contact with COVID-19-positive owners. Furthermore, in this asymptomatic dog, viral shedding was detected in a second RT-qPCR (with low Ct values), six days after the dog's first positive test and 13 days after the owner's positive COVID-19 test. The data suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is able to replicate in asymptomatic dogs for almost a week.

All dogs belonging to animal shelters, 0/25 (0.00%), were seronegative to SARS-CoV-2 infection, with 20 living in close contact in parks and six kept in separated cages. Hence, it is unlikely that dogs from shelters are more prone to SARS-CoV-2 infection, as this infection was more prevalent within COVID-19-positive households. However, a SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity of 2.1% was reported in Dutch shelter cats [17] , evidencing that cats may be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection in these conditions due to efficient viral transmission between cats. Moreover, reports of stray cats and dogs seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 were also described, evidencing the role of cat-to-cat transmission and/or environmental contamination as a potential source of SARS-CoV-2 infection [15, 16, 22] .

In this study, 4/15 (26.67%) of the seropositive cats and 2/7 (28.57%) of the seropositive dogs lived in negative households but had outdoor access, substantiating the potential exposure to contaminated environments or to other infected animals.

Of the seropositive cats, 1/15 (6.67%) were co-infected with FIV and was symptomatic. Villanueva-Saz et al. reported that 3/4 (75.00%) cats seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 were co-infected with Toxoplasma gondii, FIV, or both [16] . It is therefore hypothesized that coinfection with FIV may play an important role in the susceptibility and clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cats.

A higher percentage of seropositive cats were symptomatic, including 9/15 (60.00%) cats, with most showing more than one clinical sign, and 5/15 (33.33%) were euthanized or succumbed to death. On the contrary, from the 7 seropositive dogs, only 1 (14.29%) was symptomatic and exhibited digestive signs. Hence, cats appear to be more likely to develop disease and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection than dogs. However, more studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Previous reports showed that cats and dogs infected with SARS-CoV-2 suffered from myocarditis [53] and three cats developed respiratory signs, loss of appetite, and lethargy [11, 13] . However, a longitudinal study in Texas of dogs and cats living with at least one human infected with SARS-CoV-2 reported that the majority (82.4%) of SARS-CoV-2-infected cats and dogs were asymptomatic [27] , demonstrating different results.

Evaluation of seroconversion and antibody longevity in pets is crucial to evaluate humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 in natural conditions. The RT-qPCR positive dog in this study was seropositive 16 days after the first positive RT-qPCR result of the dog, however the time to seroconversion is unknown. In experimental studies, dogs seroconverted 14 days post infection (dpi), with a peak at 21 dpi [30] , and cats at 7 to 12 dpi [29, 30] . Pets seroconversion data are similar to the results observed in humans, where individuals seroconverted at 13 to 21 dpi [54] . Therefore, for diagnostic purposes, serological testing of pets should be performed at least two weeks after contact with a COVID-19-positive owner.

Moreover, in this study, the results of a second sampling of one cat and two dogs suggest that longevity of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 may not be lasting, as one cat was seronegative after three months and two dogs were seronegative after one and nine months. Remarkably, consistent persistence of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies was reported in one pet ferret 129 days after the first sampling [55] , however extensive longitudinal animal studies are lacking to address antibody longevity. Hamer et al. reported that the titers of neutralizing antibodies in pets seem to fluctuate along time, as across 15 antibody-positive animals, titers increased (33.3%), decreased (33.3%), or were stable (33.3%) over time [27] . Therefore, more studies are needed to better understand humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 by pets.

While no study to date revealed transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from pets back to humans, cats and dogs demonstrated susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and may therefore represent potential viral reservoirs. As the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 is under strong positive selection [56] . A number of mutations in the S protein not found in viruses recovered from humans were found in viruses recovered from animals [57] , evidencing that these can be associated with increased adaptability/variability to other animal hosts and give rise to new animal-specific variants, as reported in mink [34] . Therefore, a onehealth approach to the pandemic is crucial to prevent the emergence of new animal-specific variants as well as to better understand viral-host adaptation and evolution processes of SARS-CoV-2.

The importance of animals in the transmission of zoonotic diseases is often difficult to determine, as data on these zoonotic viruses in animals are generally poor. The role of animals in important zoonoses, such as SARS-CoV-2 can be elucidated through largescale seroepidemiologic studies using a one-health approach to identify events at highrisk interfaces, such as a human-pet interface, which may contribute to the spread and perpetuation of these diseases. In this study, we demonstrated that cats and dogs were susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection primarily through close contact with infected owners, with cats appearing more susceptible to infection than dogs. The data obtained emphasize the need for further epidemiologic studies, and the need to implement animal surveillance plans for SARS-Co-2 in animals in the future. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a wide-scale seroepidemiologic study of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cats and dogs under natural conditions in Portugal. Funding: This research was co-financed by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) of the European Union, through Operational Program PO Centro 2020 of Portugal 2020 under the reference Centro-01-0247-FEDER-38.121 managed by the ANI-Agência Nacional de Inovação. This research was also supported by Equigerminal, S.A. internal project with the reference EQG004-IDI-0008. A.A. was partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) and ERDF (UIDB/04423/2020, UIDP/04423/2020, and PTDC/CTA-AMB/31774/2017).

The animal study protocol was approved by the Equigerminal Institutional Review Board under the project code AWEC20201022 approved on 22 nd October, 2020. The study complies with the EU general data protection regulation (GDPR) requirements.

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Microorganisms 2022, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 14 Figure A1 . Signalment of (a) cats and (b) dogs from the SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiologic study of pets in Portugal.

A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China

The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2

A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

Isolation and characterization of 2019-nCoV-like coronavirus from Malayan pangolins

Probable pangolin origin of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the COVID-19 outbreak

Identifying SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins

Are pangolins scapegoats of the COVID-19 outbreak-CoV transmission and pathology evidence?

Memory in viral quasispecies

Infection of dogs with SARS-CoV-2

SARS-CoV-2 in quarantined domestic cats from COVID-19 households or close contacts

SARS-CoV-2 natural transmission from human to cat

A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China

The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2

A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

Isolation and characterization of 2019-nCoV-like coronavirus from Malayan pangolins

Probable pangolin origin of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the COVID-19 outbreak

Identifying SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins

Are pangolins scapegoats of the COVID-19 outbreak-CoV transmission and pathology evidence?

Memory in viral quasispecies

Infection of dogs with SARS-CoV-2

SARS-CoV-2 in quarantined domestic cats from COVID-19 households or close contacts

SARS-CoV-2 natural transmission from human to cat

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pets living with COVID-19 owners diagnosed during the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain: A case of an asymptomatic cat with SARS-CoV-2 in Europe

First reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in companion animals

A serological survey of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in dogs in Wuhan

Serologic screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in cats and dogs during first coronavirus disease wave

Serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 and co-infections in stray cats in Spain

Serological Screening for Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Dutch Shelter Cats

Serological survey of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in dogs and cats

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 within the dog population in Croatia: Host factors and clinical outcome

SARS-CoV-2 antibodies seroprevalence in dogs from France using ELISA and an automated western blotting assay

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) exposure in pet cats and dogs in Minnesota

Neutralizing antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 in stray animals from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing serum antibodies in cats: A serological investigation

Absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cats and dogs in close contact with a cluster of COVID-19 patients in a veterinary campus

Evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in cats and dogs from households in Italy

Occurrence of Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the Domestic Cat Population of Germany

Natural SARS-CoV-2 infections, including virus isolation, among serially tested cats and dogs in households with confirmed human COVID-19 cases in

High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pets from COVID-19+ households

Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2

Experimental infection of domestic dogs and cats with SARS-CoV-2: Pathogenesis, transmission, and response to reexposure in cats

SARS-CoV-2 infection, disease and transmission in domestic cats

Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in domestic cats

From people to Panthera: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in tigers and lions at the Bronx Zoo

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans

Captive gorillas test positive for coronavirus

SARS-CoV-2 exposure in wild white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)

SARS-CoV-2 Exposure in Escaped Mink

SARS-CoV-2 in fruit bats, ferrets, pigs, and chickens: An experimental transmission study

Infection and rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ferrets

Hamster and ferret experimental infection with intranasal low dose of a single strain of SARS-CoV-2

A mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis

Susceptibility of raccoon dogs for experimental SARS-CoV-2 infection

Susceptibility of tree shrew to SARS-CoV-2 infection

Susceptibility of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to SARS-CoV-2

Respiratory disease in rhesus macaques inoculated with SARS-CoV-2

Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS, and SARS in a nonhuman primate model

Experimental infection of cattle with SARS-CoV-2

Feline and canine coronaviruses: Common genetic and pathobiological features

How close is SARS-CoV-2 to canine and feline coronaviruses?

SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Portugal in

Data. Our World in Data: Statistics and Research, Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Available online

Myocarditis in naturally infected pets with the British variant of COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2−specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease patients

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in household domestic ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)

Positive Selection as a Key Player for SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenicity: Insights into ORF1ab, S and E genes

Mutations Arising in SARS-CoV-2 Spike on Sustained Human-to-Human Transmission and Human-to-Animal Passage

We thank the veterinarians' doctors and pet owners for their close and beneficial collaboration, as well as all participants for their contributions to the study. We would like to thank all the constructive comments and suggestions provided by two anonymous reviewers, which greatly improved the quality of this work.

 Figure A1 . Signalment of (a) cats and (b) dogs from the SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiologic study of pets in Portugal.