key: cord-0996745-cxc6gg8x authors: Miyahara, Reiko; Tsuchiya, Naho; Yasuda, Ikkoh; Ko, Yura K.; Furuse, Yuki; Sando, Eiichiro; Nagata, Shohei; Imamura, Tadatsugu; Saito, Mayuko; Morimoto, Konosuke; Imamura, Takeaki; Shobugawa, Yugo; Nishiura, Hiroshi; Suzuki, Motoi; Oshitani, Hitoshi title: Familial Clusters of Coronavirus Disease in 10 Prefectures, Japan, February−May 2020 date: 2021-03-03 journal: Emerg Infect Dis DOI: 10.3201/eid2703.203882 sha: c3dde4873cc023a965f5e6b5130bc2d9faf24955 doc_id: 996745 cord_uid: cxc6gg8x The overall coronavirus disease secondary attack rate (SAR) in family members was 19.0% in 10 prefectures of Japan during February 22–May 31, 2020. The SAR was lower for primary cases diagnosed early, within 2 days after symptom onset. The SAR of asymptomatic primary cases was 11.8%. In this study, we defined a primary case as the first case to show development of symptoms and to be diagnosed in a family or the first diagnosed asymptomatic case in a family who had an apparent history of contact with a nonfamilial COVID-19 case-patient. We defined secondary cases as laboratory-confirmed cases from the list of close family contacts of primary case-patients. Because websites provided only symptoms at diagnosis, we could not identify presymptomatic cases. We calculated SAR as the proportion of secondary cases of family close contacts among the total number of family close contacts and determined the SAR, risk ratio, and 95% CI, stratified by the characteristics of the primary case-patients. We compared the SAR before and after the declaration of the state of emergency on April 16. All statistical analyses were conducted by using Stata version 14.0 (StataCorp, https://www.stata.com). During February 22-May 31, 2020, the 10 prefectures reported 306 primary cases and 775 family close contacts from 306 families. Eighty-seven primary cases were associated with 147 family secondary cases (Table 1 ; Appendix Figure 2 ). The overall SAR was 19.0%. Among 28 asymptomatic primary cases, 7 caused family clusters (Table 2; Appendix Table 2) , and the SAR was 11.8%. Eight prefectures that tested for asymptomatic contacts showed an SAR that was 1.77 times higher than the SAR for 2 prefectures that used a nontesting strategy. The age-stratified SAR was higher for persons 60-69 years of age (36.5%) and persons <20 years of age (23.8%) than for persons 20-29 years of age (13.3%), persons 30-39 years of age (20.4%), persons 40-49 years of age (10.1%), and persons 50-59 years of age (16.1%) ( Table 2) . With increasing time from symptom onset to diagnosis, the SARs in households increased from 11.6% (>2 days) to 40.0% (>14 days) ( Table 2 ). When the data were stratified for analysis by the number of household contacts, 4 household contacts showed the highest SAR (25.7%). After a quarantine at home was requested from the government on April 16, the SAR increased from 17.4% to 21.0%, but the risk ratio did not reach statistical significance. This family cluster analysis in the 10 prefectures of Japan showed that the overall SAR of the family cluster was estimated to be 19.0% in Japan. Meta-analysis from 43 household transmission studies estimated a SAR of 18.1% (3): 3.9% in Singapore (7) the United States (13) and Norway (14) . In addition, the SAR of asymptomatic primary cases was 11.8% in our study, which was higher than the 0%-4.4% reported in a limited number of previous studies (6, 15) . The SAR heterogeneity might have been dependent on the surveillance protocol for asymptomatic contacts. The studies in the United States (13) and Norway (14) , which had high SARs, detected secondary cases by using serologic tests. Our study also indicated that 8 prefectures that tested for asymptomatic contacts showed a 1.8 times higher SAR than did 2 prefectures that tested only for symptomatic contacts. A low proportion of diagnoses of asymptomatic cases might underestimate the SAR. We showed that SAR was higher for persons <1-19 years of age and >60 years of age than for other age groups. High infectivity for the younger age group (6) and the older age group (4) was reported from South Korea and China, as in our study, but most other studies did not show significant differences in SAR by age of primary case-patients (9, 13) . Age-dependent infectivity might be associated with household lifestyles, family structure, and clinical conditions (9) . Meta-analysis showed that the sex of the primary case-patient was not associated with transmission (5). If primary cases were detected <2 days of symptom onset, the SAR was lower than that for primary cases detected >2 days after symptom onset. This finding was related to the low SAR for case-patients who had a contact history because they could receive PCRs, as close contacts did earlier, and might have had a short time of exposure to family members. Our results were concordant with previous studies showing an increased risk for transmission as the contact duration was prolonged (4), as well as the effect of quarantining index case-patients when symptoms were reported (10). The first limitation of our study is that symptomatic cases diagnosed during the presymptomatic period might have been classified as asymptomatic cases. Second, the number of asymptomatic cases might have been underreported because of different testing protocols among prefectures. Third, we might have misclassified the primary cases if a coprimary case existed or the direction of transmission between asymptomatic cases and symptomatic cases was not clear. In summary, our study results provide us with useful implications of the high SAR of asymptomatic primary case-patients and contacts with long exposure times to primary case-patients. Self-quarantine and rapid isolation of confirmed case-patients from households after symptom onset might be needed to reduce transmission in families. Experts Members of The National COVID-19 Cluster-based approach to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response in Japan Clusters of coronavirus disease in communities What do we know about SARS-CoV-2 transmission? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the secondary attack rate and associated risk factors Risk factors associated with occurrence of COVID-19 among household persons exposed to patients with confirmed COVID-19 in Qingdao Municipal, China Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis Coronavirus disease outbreak in call center Age-related risk of household transmission of COVID-19 in Singapore. I nfluenza Other Respir Viruses Contact tracing assessment of COVID-19 transmission dynamics in Taiwan and risk at different exposure periods before and after symptom onset Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study The characteristics of household transmission of COVID-19 Contact settings and risk for transmission in 3,410 close contacts of patients with COVID-19 in Guangzhou, China: a prospective cohort study Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China Household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States Bergen COVID-19 Research Group. Seroconversion in household members of COVID-19 outpatients Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in different settings We thank local health care centers and prefectural offices in Aomori, Akita, Gunma, Tochigi, Toyama, Shiga, Okayama, Kochi, Saga, and Kagoshima Prefectures for providing COVID-19 public health responses and making data publicly available on their websites. This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare CA Program (grant no. JPMH20CA2024). Dr. Miyahara is a project researcher at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Her primary research interest is the clinical and genetic epidemiology of infectious diseases.