key: cord-0996114-uv7a717g authors: Shrestha, Gentle S.; Lamsal, Ritesh; Tiwari, Pradip; Acharya, Subhash P. title: Anesthesiology and Critical Care Response to COVID-19 in Resource-limited Settings: Experiences from Nepal date: 2021-02-12 journal: Anesthesiol Clin DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2021.02.004 sha: e3051c3fceb68c7000b490cf67bf9edb1769f582 doc_id: 996114 cord_uid: uv7a717g It is difficult to predict the future course and length of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which has devastated healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Anesthesiology and critical care services are hard hit as many hospitals have stopped performing elective surgeries, staff and scarce hospital resources have been diverted to manage COVID-19 patients, and several makeshift COVID-19 units had to be set up. Intensive care units are overwhelmed with critically ill patients. In these difficult times, LMICs need to improvise, perform indigenous research, adapt international guidelines to suit local needs, and target attainable clinical goals. perform indigenous research, adapt international guidelines to suit local needs, and target attainable clinical goals. Anesthesiology and Critical Care Response to Covid19 in resource limited settings: Experiences from Nepal As the human population continues to rise, the global burden of surgical procedures and the need for anesthesia and critical care is increasing. According to the World Health Organization, the global burden of surgeries was over 310 million in 2012, with an increase of nearly 40% from a similar estimate in 2004. 1 A recent report highlighted that nearly five billion people do not have access to safe, affordable surgical and anesthesia care, and one-third of the global burden of disease requires surgery and anesthesia management. 2 However, only a small number of surgeries are carried out in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), mainly because of the lack of resources and personnel. The disparity in the distribution of healthcare among countries will probably widen in the coming days, as LMICs have a higher population growth compared with high-income countries. The pandemic of COVID-19 is evolving. The spectrum of COVID-19 varies from asymptomatic cases to severe disease requiring intensive care admission and multiorgan support. Nearly 80% of COVID-19 patients experience mild-to-moderate symptoms and around 5% of cases require intensive care unit (ICU) admission. 3 However, the distribution and severity of COVID-19 are substantially dissimilar in different parts of the world. The mortality rate of cases admitted to the ICU is between 23.4% to 33% and the average length of ICU admission is 10.8 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f days. 4 The mortality rate among patients receiving mechanical ventilation is 43% to 67%, and it is close to 70% among patients older than 60 years. 5 Around the world, providing safe anesthesia and critical care services has been a major challenge during the pandemic. This problem is more pronounced in LMICs. Anesthesia and critical care services are easily overwhelmed in LMICs because of the dense population with a high rate of infection, limited testing capacity and weak contact-tracing, inadequate hospital and critical care beds, inadequate anesthesiologists and intensivists, weak health-care infrastructure, and limited access to therapeutics and personal protective equipment. Most LMICs responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with various public health measures, like strict lockdown, social distancing, and universal masking. The measures were initially effective in reducing the rapid spread of the infection, but most of these stringent measures have since been relaxed in many countries. The limitations of treating critically ill patients, even in high-income countries, have been abundantly discussed in academic and public forums in the current pandemic. 6 Nepal is one of the poorest countries of the world with a nominal gross domestic product per capita of only around US$1070. 7 The first case of COVID-19 in Nepal was diagnosed in January 2020, through testing done in Hong Kong, due to the unavailability of the reversetranscriptase polymerase chain reaction test in Nepal. 8 As Nepal has limited health care capacity, including of intensive care beds, a strict national 'lock-down' with social distancing measures was imposed for months, from March to July 2020. However, since easing the national lockdown, Nepal has seen a surge of COVID-19 cases and deaths. 9 As of November 8, 2020, there are over 194,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19, with 1108 deaths in Nepal. 9 The future J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f course and outcome of the pandemic are impossible to predict as the numbers of new infections and deaths continue to increase at an alarming rate. The ongoing pandemic has severely affected all sectors of Nepal's healthcare delivery system. Anesthesia and critical care services are hard hit, as sparse health resources and public spending have been diverted to the containment of the infection, and the management of COVID-19 patients. In Nepal, the first intensive care unit was established in 1973, and this was the only well-equipped ICU in the country for close to 20 years. 10 However, ICU equipment and trained personnel are scarce. 12 It is difficult to procure essential ICU equipment and personal protective devices as medical manufacturing facilities are nonexistent in the country. The government, as well as private institutions, have already spent enormous sums developing new makeshift intensive care units and procuring consumables; it is doubtful whether most of these institutions can fund the additional cost of running optimal services in the operating rooms (ORs) and intensive care units. Nepal, like most resource-limited countries, was unprepared to face the rapid upsurge of a highly infectious disease. There was only one dedicated tertiary-level infectious disease hospital in the entire country before the current pandemic. There is also huge variability in the distribution of healthcare across the country, with very poor health infrastructure outside a few big cities. Initially, the Government of Nepal segregated all government, and some private hospitals, into either "COVID-dedicated hospital" or "non-COVID hospital". However, with the rapid increase in the number of patients, and limited health centers that could cater to such patients, the COVID-19 hospitals were soon overwhelmed and it was no longer possible to maintain the segregation. Currently, all hospitals in the country manage patients, irrespective of COVID-19, unless patients have to be referred to a higher center for specialized care. After the initial 'lockdown', all elective surgeries were stopped as the focus shifted to managing patients with COVID-19. In many hospitals, this policy continues to date with surgical departments only treating patients with urgent or emergency conditions. With limited resources, anesthesiologists were forced to improvise to decrease the risk of contagion. Many anesthesiologists and intensivists started using video-laryngoscopes for the first time. Several types of barrier protective devices, like transparent aerosol boxes and plastic sheets, were used to cover the patient's head during aerosol-generating procedures, like endotracheal intubation, airway suctioning, and extubation. Many standard recommendations that weren't costprohibitive, like the use of high-efficiency viral filters and minimizing aerosol-generating procedures, were followed. The capacity for critical care delivery in LMICs is limited. Most LMICs in Asia have fewer than three ICU beds per 100,000 population; Nepal has 2.8 ICU beds per 100,000 population, whereas Germany has 29.4 ICU beds, and the United States has 34.7 per 100,000 population. 14, 15 Most of the ORs and ICUs do not have the provision of a negative pressure system. Even in other Asian countries, less than 40% of the ICUs have the provision of negative pressure rooms. 16 A central monitoring system and invasive and advanced monitors are limited to very few tertiary-care centers. A recent cross-sectional study of all COVID-care hospitals in Nepal found a lack of most basic equipment in the ICU. 17 Only around 63% of the hospitals had a defibrillator, and only 26.7% of hospitals could process arterial blood gas samples. 17 Proper strategies to support and manage infected workers also seem to be lacking. In many hospitals, healthcare staff is now asked to work simultaneously in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 areas of the hospital. Even infected patients have been shifted to non-designated areas of the hospital because COVID-19 dedicated areas are over-flooded with infected patients, increasing the risk of spreading the infection. There is also a scarcity of essential anesthesia and critical care equipment for COVID-19 patients. For instance, ultrasonography, and other radiological devices may not be available in COVID-19 designated areas of the hospital. There may also be difficulty in obtaining x-rays and echocardiography tests because of the logistical difficulties in sharing the same facilities and equipment between infected and non-infected patients. This not only adds to the difficulty for the anesthesiologists and intensivists, but severely compromises patient care. Healthcare workers are at risk of contracting COVID-19 due to frequent contact with infected patients. The overall proportion of healthcare workers infected with COVID-19 is around 10%. 20 This proportion is approximately 18% in the United States, 4% in China, and 9% in Italy. 20 The availability of good-quality PPE kits, proper use of PPE, and infection control training programs are key to reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated infection. The WHO has recommended the use of gloves, masks, goggles or face shields, and long-sleeved gowns with N95 respirators for aerosol-generating medical procedures. In many LMICs, the supply and availability of PPE are inadequate. The surgical masks and N95 masks are reused in most hospitals in Nepal. As certified respirators are in short supply, the 'fit-test' is rarely carried out. The government has encouraged local production of PPE, but quality control and surveillance are limited, endangering the safety of healthcare workers. Face shields and goggles are shared after disinfection. The use of reusable elastomeric respirators and reusable powered air-purifying respirators are alternatives, but their procurement has been difficult. An infection prevention and control (IPC) program, with a dedicated trained team at the health care facility, is recommended in all hospitals. IPC measures, if implemented appropriately, protect patients, healthcare workers, and visitors. In an international survey, only 11% of respondents from low-income countries had consistent access to respiratory equipment, 12% to isolation gowns, 4% to negative pressure rooms or personnel training in IPC. 21 Inadequate access to IPC equipment and training can lead to major COVID-19 outbreaks in The delivery of quality care during any pandemic is challenging as crucial scientific information is always evolving. Therapeutic options may also be uncertain. A recent study found a significant disparity in the number of COVID-19 related studies and publications between high-income and LMICs. 21 The protocols, guidelines, and therapeutic options for COVID-19 are mostly formulated based on studies and experiences of high-income countries. However, such guidelines may not necessarily address the unique problems of resource-limited settings. Some of the standard guidelines may not even be feasible in most ORs and ICUs in Nepal and other resource-limited countries because of resource-constraints, and significant variability in the structure and composition of the workforce. Data-driven quality improvement programs in highincome countries have helped to identify gaps in health care service delivery, and design "improvement approaches". There is a glaring lack of such programs in resource-limited settings. In the current pandemic, there is a significant overload of clinical information, but without the accompanying high-quality clinical research. There is a paucity of unifying clinical guidelines and a lot of uncertainty about the best treatment options, resulting in dissimilar treatment decisions between patients. There is an urgent need for research focused on LMICs, as J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f the scientific evidence derived from high-income countries may not be accurate when applied in a different setting. For instance, the population in LMICs may be younger than in the western world and may have fewer risk factors for developing severe COVID-19, like obesity. Most hospitals in LMICs may also not be able to meet the standards recommended by international guidelines. An option may be for international bodies to develop or propose the minimal safety standards for anesthesia and critical care services in LMICs, considering the available resources, without compromising the safety of patients and health care workers. For example, dexamethasone is readily available and can be administered in most patients. It can be prioritized over expensive therapeutics of questionable benefits that are not easily available in low-resource settings, like newer antivirals, immunomodulators, and convalescent plasma therapy. The current and previous pandemics have pushed us to innovate. These innovations are extremely handy when resources are limited. Experiences from the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong suggested that when negative pressure isolation rooms are not available, normal rooms can be converted to makeshift negative pressure rooms by the use of industrial exhaust fans. 22 In our center, we converted the post-operative care unit into a COVID ICU. We applied industrial exhaust fans over each bed of the patient, attempting to create negative pressure systems and to minimize the viral load ( Figure 1) . Similarly, several cost-effective improvised videolaryngoscopes, PPE kits, and ventilators have been designed recently. [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] However, these improvised surrogates should be tested for safety and effectiveness before generalized use. As the population of the LMICs is relatively young with possibly fewer risk factors, resourceconstrained countries may still achieve acceptable clinical outcomes by determining the minimal standards of care, and doing the 'basics' right. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Summary In resource-limited settings, it is often not possible or practicable to meet the clinical targets stipulated in international guidelines. This difficulty is more pronounced in the ongoing pandemic as the optimal utilization of scarce resources is crucial. It is useful for healthcare delivery systems in resource-limited settings to promote pragmatic innovative measures, adapt international guidelines to suit local needs, focus on diagnostic and therapeutic measures that are easily accessible and less resource-intensive, and promote native research activities. It is equally important to shift the focus beyond ICU admissions, advanced monitoring, and therapeutic requirements to other important aspects of treating COVID-19 patients where there are better chances of alleviating suffering and providing equitable care. Integrating hospice and palliative care into the healthcare system, which is strikingly deficient in LMICs, will also go a long way in providing dignified end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Post-anesthesia care unit is converted into COVID ICU. Due to lack of negative pressure system, industrial exhaust fans were installed to minimize the viral load. Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012 Global access to surgical care: a modelling study Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention Global impact of COVID-19 infection requiring admission to the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19: Interpreting the Current Epidemiology Triage during the COVID-19 epidemic in Spain: better and worse ethical arguments World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files The first 2019 novel coronavirus case in Nepal Covid-19 Cases Map Representation. Ministry of Health and Population Nepal Government of Nepal: Ministry of Health and Population. Health Sector Emergency Response Plan COVID-19 Pandemic Preparedness for Coronavirus Disease in Hospitals of Nepal: A Nationwide Survey Contextualizing Critical Care Medicine in the Face of Covid-19 Pandemic Critical Care Bed Capacity in Asian Countries and Regions Critical care capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Global availability of intensive care beds Structure, Organization, and Delivery of Critical Care in Asian ICUs Assessment of Health-related Country Preparedness and Readiness of Nepal for Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic. Preparedness and Readiness of Government of Nepal Designated COVID Hospitals 2020 COVID-19 in health care workers -A systematic review and meta-analysis A disparity in the number of studies related to COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 between low-and middle-income countries and high-income countries Expanding ICU facilities in an epidemic: recommendations based on experience from the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong and Singapore An affordable videolaryngoscope for use during the COVID-19 pandemic Low-cost Videolaryngoscope in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic A Positive-Pressure Environment Disposable Shield (PEDS) for COVID-19 Health Care Worker Protection