key: cord-0995905-mkf1f0mj authors: Simonsson, Otto; Bazin, Olivier; Fisher, Stephen D.; Goldberg, Simon B. title: Effects of an eight-week, online mindfulness program on anxiety and depression in university students during COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial date: 2021-09-23 journal: Psychiatry Res DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114222 sha: f5176b897b7a2b1f476e902300da666758d830c1 doc_id: 995905 cord_uid: mkf1f0mj The COVID-19 pandemic has had adverse mental health effects for many groups in British society, especially young adults and university students. The present study reports secondary outcomes (i.e., symptoms of anxiety and depression) from a randomized waitlist controlled trial, with a one-month post-intervention follow-up, on the effects of a guided, eight-week mindfulness program delivered online during the COVID-19 pandemic among students at the University of Oxford. Longitudinal multilevel models showed greater reductions in anxiety but not depression symptoms for participants in the mindfulness condition relative to participants in the waitlist control condition (time X group B=-0.36, p=.025). On March 23 rd , 2020, the British government announced a nationwide lockdown in response to the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic. Restrictions required people to stay at home, except for essential activities (e.g., buying basic necessities, attending to medical needs); schools and universities transitioned to online teaching; and non-essential shops and businesses were closed. Although easing of restrictions began in early summer the same year, the United Kingdom (UK) went into a secondand later a thirdnationwide lockdown in response to rising cases and deaths. The economic and social fallout of the nationwide lockdowns, along with the real and perceived threat of infection by COVID-19, has had adverse mental health effects for many groups in British society, especially young adults and university students (Daly, Sutin & Robinson, 2020; Niedzwiedz et al., 2021; O'Connor et al., 2021; Pieh et al., 2020; Savage et al., 2020) . For example, nationally representative surveys in the UK have found that young adults showed some of the largest decreases in mental health (Pierce et al., 2020 (Pierce et al., , 2021 . Another survey with a sample of university students in the UKweighted to be representative by age, gender and university typefound that two-thirds reported feeling psychologically worse than before the pandemic (Hewitt, 2021) . Hence, given the increased prevalence of psychiatric symptoms among university students, there is a need to investigate accessible interventions that can reduce distress. Mindfulnessa particular way of paying attention, purposefully and nonjudgmentally, to the present moment (Kabat-Zinn, 1994)is a construct that has emerged as a potential protective factor during the pandemic (Conversano et al., 2020; Matiz et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2020) . Previous research has shown reduced psychological distress among university students in Spain and China following mindfulness-based interventions designed for the pandemic (González-García et al., 2021; . No 4 study, however, has thus far examined the effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on university students in the UK during the pandemic. Using a randomized waitlist control design, we therefore investigated whether an eight-week, online mindfulness program impacted symptoms of anxiety and depression among students at the University of Oxford. The data in the present study were collected as part of a preregistered experiment whose primary outcome was affective polarization (Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/px8m2). The outcomes reported here were secondary and not included in the primary preregistration. Students (≥18 years) at the University of Oxford were invited to participate in the study and attend an eight-week mindfulness course for free. Eligible participants completed baseline assessments prior to randomization in January 2021 (T1). Participants were randomized (1:1) using Microsoft Excel's randomization formula to start the mindfulness course immediately (mindfulness condition) or three months later (waitlist control condition). Post-test assessment (T2) was taken after the end of the first mindfulness course and follow-up assessment (T3) was taken one month after T2 (prior to the second mindfulness course). All data were collected using Qualtrics (https://www.qualtrics.com/). The reporting of the present study follows the CONSORT 2010 statement: http://www.consort-statement.org/ The eight-week mindfulness program was adapted from the book Mindfulness: a Practical Guide to Finding Peace in a Frantic World (Williams & Penman, 2011) . The course consisted of eight weekly classes and was delivered online via Zoom (https://zoom.us/). Classes lasted 90 minutes (to allow participants to familiarize themselves with the online format, sessions 1 and 2 were 105 minutes) and involved mindfulness meditation practices, 5 periods of inquiry and reflection, and interactive exercises based on cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants were encouraged to engage with home practice 20-30 minutes per day. Four courses (15-29 participants in each course) were delivered in parallel by the same mindfulness teacher. If participants were absent from a session, they were invited to attend one of the parallel sessions that week. The mindfulness teacher met Good Practice Guidelines for Teachers of Mindfulness-Based Interventions as defined by the British Association of Mindfulness Based Approaches (BAMBA, 2020). Participants provided their gender, age, citizenship, ethnicity, first language, and degree program. Participants completed four-item versions of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety and depression scales (Pilkonis et al., 2011) . Items assess symptoms of anxiety (e.g., "My worries overwhelmed me") and depression (e.g., "I felt hopeless") in the past 7 days. Responses were rated on a 1-(Never) to 5-point (Always) scale. A total score for each scale was computed by summing across the four items, with adequate internal consistency for anxiety (α=0.84) and depression (α=0.88). Analyses of anxiety and depression variables followed the analytic plan outlined for the primary study outcomes. Specifically, we conducted multilevel models with assessments nested within participants over time. We used maximum likelihood estimation which is robust 6 to data missing at random (Graham, 2009 ). We examined time X group (mindfulness vs. control) interactions as our test of group effects. Analyses were conducted in R using the 'lme4' package (Bates et al., 2015) . Descriptive statistics for both groups are shown in Table 1 . [Insert Table 1 Here] Anxiety and depression scores showed acceptable skewness and kurtosis (Curran et al., 1996) . On average, anxiety symptoms were moderately elevated (mean=11.19, SD=3.63, T>60) and depression symptoms were mildly elevated (mean=9.95, SD=3.87, T-score>55). A significant time X group interaction was detected for changes in anxiety over time (B=-0.36, t=-2.25, p=.025) with the treatment group showing larger reductions relative to the control group. Between-group Cohen's d effect sizes (i.e., within-group change in treatment minus withingroup change in control; Becker, 1988 ) showed a small magnitude difference at post-test (d=-0.39) and follow-up (d=-0.20). The time X group interaction was not significant for depression (B=-0.06, t=-0.94, p=.347) . Correspondingly, the between-group Cohen's ds were also smaller at post-test (d=-0.26) and follow-up (d=-0.06). In this randomized controlled trial, we examined whether an eight-week mindfulness program delivered online had an effect on symptoms of anxiety and depression among students at the University of Oxford during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants randomized to the mindfulness condition showed a significantly greater reduction in anxiety but not depression over time relative to participants randomized to the waitlist control condition. The finding of reduced anxiety symptoms corresponds with a recent meta-analysis of studies conducted pre-COVID-19 and primarily in person showing that mindfulness-based interventions reduce anxiety symptoms among university students relative to passive controls (Dawson et al., 2020) . The current study joins a recent single-arm trial conducted in Spain (González-García et al., 2021) and a randomized controlled trial conducted in China showing reduced anxiety associated with online mindfulness training. The lack of between-group effects on depression is consistent with , raising the possibility that anxiety may be more amenable to mindfulness training during COVID-19 than depression. The study design has several limitations. First, the sample consisted of a single UK university and those who self-selected into the study, limiting generalizability of the findings. Second, the influence of non-specific factors such as instructor attention and expectancy were not controlled for in our use of a waitlist control. Third, the participants were not asked to report amount of home practice, which has been shown to associated with intervention outcomes (Parsons et al., 2017) . Fourth, anxiety and depression scores were assessed using self-reported measures and may therefore have been influenced by social desirability bias. Fifth, the present study reported secondary outcomes and the results should therefore be interpreted with caution. 8 Despite these limitations, results suggest that an eight-week mindfulness program delivered online may be an effective approach for British universities to promote student mental health during global challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Author Contributions OS conceptualized, designed and preregistered the study, with input from SG. OS randomized participants. SG analyzed the data with assistance from OS. OB taught the mindfulness courses. OS wrote the manuscript, with comments from OB, SF, and SG. SF provided local supervision. SG supervised the study. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. Good Practice Guidelines for Teaching Mindfulness-Based Courses Fitting Linear mixed-effects models using lme4 Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures Mindfulness, age and gender as protective factors against psychological distress during Covid-19 pandemic The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis Longitudinal changes in mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study Mindfulness-based interventions for university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Feasibility of a Brief Online Mindfulness and Compassion-Based Intervention to Promote Mental Health Among University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world Students' views on the impact of Coronavirus on their higher education experience in 2021. HEPI Policy Note 29. Higher Education Policy Institute Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life Positive impact of mindfulness meditation on mental health of female teachers during the 10 COVID-19 outbreak in Italy Mental health and health behaviours before and during the initial phase of the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analyses of the UK Household Longitudinal Study Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health & Wellbeing study Home practice in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of participants' mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes Mental health during COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population Mental health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: a latent class trajectory analysis using longitudinal UK data. The Lancet Psychiatry Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger Mental health and movement behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in UK university students: Prospective cohort study Psychiatric symptoms, risk, and protective factors among university students in quarantine during the COVID-19 A mindfulness-based mobile health (mHealth) intervention among psychologically distressed university students in quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial Mindfulness: A practical guide to finding peace in a frantic world A Brief Online Mindfulness-Based Group Intervention for Psychological Distress Among Chinese Residents During COVID-19: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Stay Mindful and Carry on: Mindfulness Neutralizes COVID-19 Stressors on Work Engagement via Sleep Duration 20 0.61 -0.09 -0.21 Note: Anxiety=4-item PROMIS Anxiety; Depression=4-item PROMIS Depression; Follow-up=1-month follow-up; d within =within-group Cohen's d computed as later timepoint minus earlier timepoint for control and treatment groups separately (i.e., pre-to post-d reported on Post row, pre-to follow-up-d reported on Follow-up row).