key: cord-0984557-44xegrnc
authors: Gomez Marti, Juan Luis; Mays, Ashley; McCullough, Melissa; Wells, Alan; Phan, Tung
title: Evaluation of Viral Loads in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Infection: Higher Loads Do Not Translate Into Different Testing Scenarios
date: 2022-03-23
journal: Microbiol Insights
DOI: 10.1177/11786361221087537
sha: 01ae44baa8e5862e0f7420ac93bad677e4532956
doc_id: 984557
cord_uid: 44xegrnc

The Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant is very infectious, and it is spreading quickly during this pandemic. In the study, we compared viral loads estimated by means of the Ct values emerging from RT-PCR swab tests in surging cases infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in the fourth wave of COVID-19 with the three prior waves. The data comprised viral loads from positive cases detected within the UPMC health care system in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. A total of 2059 upper airway samples were collected and tested for SARS-CoV-2 positive by RT-PCR during March 2020 to September 2021. We did not observe significant difference in viral load difference between the third (December 2020 to January 2021) and fourth (June 2021 to September 2021) waves; however, they had the higher viral load than the first (March 2020 to June 2020) and second waves (June 2020 to August 2020). We did find an age-related effect with the elderly presenting with lower viral loads, which was also seen in the earlier waves. However, the level of the viral loads in the fourth wave in the respect of the previous ones was not sufficiently increased to change our testing strategies by means of increased use of rapid antigen tests (RAT).

Every virus mutates, and there is nothing exceptional about SARS-CoV-2 in the context of evolution. What we have all witnessed is SARS-CoV-2 continuing to mutate rapidly worldwide, with each new variant more infectious than the last. The highly transmissible Delta variant (B.1.617.2) was first reported in India in December 2020 (https://gvn.org/covid-19/delta-b-1-617-2/), and it quickly became the predominant strain in the United States. There are reports that the reason for the Delta virus replacing all other variants in the United States by the summer of 2021, in addition to greater infectivity, is that the Delta variant presents with much higher viral loads in the upper airways. This would have implications for the testing modalities, as various rapid antigen tests require significantly higher viral loads for detection of infection. 8 Herein, we provide a real-world experience study in which viral loads were evaluated in the Delta variant infections in the fourth wave of COVID-19 and compared with our data from the three prior waves. To be consistent in the population base, we queried the comprehensive clinical data of those persons presenting to the UPMC health care system hospitals in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.

Between March 2020 and September 2021, a total of 2059 nasopharyngeal specimens (459, 163, 988, and 449 in the first to fourth waves of COVID-19, respectively) were collected from symptomatic patients and tested as SARS-CoV-2 positive by the NAAT assays (Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay or and LDT based upon the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel). These NAAT assays were performed as part of routine medical care, and they have 2 Microbiology Insights been authorized by FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). The cycle threshold (Ct) values generated by the two NAAT assays are not identical but have been shown to be relatively comparable. 9 Viral loads were estimated by the Ct values. Statistical analyses were performed using with the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare more than two groups.

As shown in Figure 1a , there was no significant difference between the viral loads of the third (median Ct 22.0) and fourth (median Ct 23.0) waves. However, these Ct values are much lower (meaning higher viral load) than those of the first (median Ct 26.6) and second (median Ct 26.5) waves. These findings were in line with the previous reports that the Delta variant had higher viral loads in the upper airways, which might be associated with higher infectivity and transmissibility. It is obvious that the higher infectivity and transmissibility facilitated the rapid spread of the Delta variant throughout the U.S. and worldwide. The viral load of the Delta variant on the patients by different age groups (15-24, 25-49, 50-64, 65-74, and ⩾75 years) was evaluated in the fourth wave. The median Ct value of the Delta variant RNA ranged from 21.7 to 28.0 depending on the age groups ( Figure 2 ). Of note, the viral load was highest in the age groups of 25 to 49 years (median Ct 22.3) and 50 to 64 (median Ct 21.7) years, followed by the age groups of 15 to 24 years (median Ct 23.8) and 65 to 74 (median Ct 23.6) years. The patients aged ⩾75 years had the median Ct 28.0. Compared to the previous waves, the Delta variant was found to be associated with the increased viral load in the patients aged 25 to 74 years as shown in Figure 1b . In each age group of 25 to 49, 50 to 64, and 65 to 74 years, the viral loads (median Ct 22.3, 21.7, and 23.6) in the fourth wave was higher than those in the first wave (median Ct 26.9, 26.7, and 27.9) and second wave (median Ct 25.9, 24.4, and 26.4). Viral load in the upper airways is important mainly for detection, as we and others have found little correlation with viral load (Ct) at time of presentation and disease outcome. However, the various rapid antigen assays and some near patient or point of care NAAT technologies detect only lower Ct values. We, and others have found that antigen tests (RAT) as a group detect nearly all cases that present with Ct of 27 or lower, and that the rapid NAAT such as IDNow is comparable to other NAAT assays at Ct up to 33. 8, 10 To guide our utility of testing, we mapped the detected Ct values in the fourth wave cases against the cutoffs of Ct 27, 30, and 33 ( Figure 2 ). As can be seen, in the most fragile group of over 75, more 36% would be at risk of being deemed a false negative by the any of the more rapid assays, and less than half (48%) would be consistently detected by RAT assays. Even in the younger age groups, over a third would be missed by RAT assays, and about a quarter by the rapid NAAT assays.

These findings impact our approach to diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Unfortunately, the somewhat higher viral loads in the upper airways does not translate into a change in our approach of using amplification technologies within the laboratory setting to detect cases in persons who present with symptoms to our hospitals and emergency departments. This is because the risk of missing positive patients in the more vulnerable groups, such as those over 75 years of age, is still quite high. As there are SARS-CoV-2 specific therapies for those with moderate to severe disease, including aggressive use of engineered monoclonal antibodies and remdesivir limited to early in the disease process, correct diagnosis the first time is critical to preventing ventilation and death. For younger, and 3 non-high-risk outpatients not requiring hospitalization or supplemental oxygen such as in healthy children, 11 we are using RAT testing with the proviso of missing some quarter of the patients.

Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses

A comprehensive review of viral characteristics, transmission, pathophysiology, immune response, and management of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 as a basis for controlling the pandemic

Assessment of the frequency and variety of persistent symptoms among patients with COVID-19: a systematic review

First known person-to-person transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the USA

Aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2: physical principles and implications. Front Public Health

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens

Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Differences in detected viral loads guide use of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection assays towards symptomatic college students and children

Evaluation and comparison of the hologic aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay and the CDC 2019-nCoV real-time reverse transcription-PCR diagnostic panel using a four-sample pooling approach

Evaluation of the COVID19 ID NOW EUA assay

Performance of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay in symptomatic children

We thank the UPMC Clinical Microbiology Laboratory for testing the specimens.

TP and AW: designed the study and wrote the manuscript; AM and MM: managed the testing; and JM: performed statistical analyses.

All testing was performed as apart of routine clinical care and performed according to CLIA '88 regulations by appropriate personnel. The entire study was deemed to be a Quality Improvement initiative by the UPMC IRB and approved by the UPMC QI Review Board.

Tung Phan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3517-3078