key: cord-0982772-wc6493f8 authors: Purnamayanti, Ni K. D.; Wicaksana, Anggi L. title: Digital Health Services among Patients with Diabetes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review date: 2021-09-08 journal: Indian J Endocrinol Metab DOI: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_153_21 sha: 7eacc35a651b18768b285a2dff7e2ab14a725d70 doc_id: 982772 cord_uid: wc6493f8 BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 pandemic causes massive disruption of the global health system. The diabetic patients are the vulnerable parts population who are predicted to have a significant issue during the pandemic regarding the conventional type of consultation by face-to-face which may result in the higher risk of COVID-19 exposure. This study aims to observe the use of digital health services for diabetes management during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar during August until September 2020. The keywords that are used on the searching process are diabetes AND digital service OR telemedicine OR technology AND COVID-19. The criteria included the selection of scientific publication as an original research and reviews. RESULTS: All published articles were gathered from 3 search engines; PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The discussion explicates the practical considerations that are in accordance with the current condition of each country. In order to do so, the evidence is classified based on the level of global digital health framework in the developed and developing countries. It was found that the minimal level of digital health that connects diabetes patients with healthcare providers was at level 2, which is by using the video mode. The most advanced is at level 3B, which is applied by using the CGM devices, which provide active monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment based on timely clinical judgment. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to utilize the digital health service during the COVID-19. This review is projected to be beneficial for the patient and health care providers to select the most feasible approach of digital health that merits the contextual resource. pathophysiological mechanism is related to short-term hyperglycemia inhibits the immune system, increases coagulation activities and direct pancreatic islet cell injury. [7] Another review highlights the poor outcome, which occurs among COVID-19 patients with diabetes comorbidity. It is related to multifactorial aspects such as age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities (i.e., Hypertension and cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and a pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulated state). [8] There are three predictors of COVID-19 fatality among diabetes patients related to blood glucose such as glycemic control prior to admission, plasma glucose during admission, and glycemic control in hospital. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with HbA1c more than 86 mmol/mol (10%) have higher risk of mortality compared with those who have HbA1c less than 48 mmol/mol (6.5%). [9] Hyperglycemia at hospital admission is also the best predictor of the worst chest radiographic imaging results on COVID-19 patients. [10] During hospitalization, the cytokine storm could trigger acute diabetes complication such as ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar syndrome. [11] Additionally, this acute condition increase the risk of thrombosis which makes the COVID-19 infection even worsen. [12] Regarding the current pandemic situation, people with diabetes need timely integrated interventions to enhance the self-care management and to get the supportive education and medical supplies. [13] Diabetes patients and families should be well equipped to deal with dietary adherence, regular exercise, stress management, medication adherence, and routine blood glucose monitoring. [6, 14] Regular medication should be continued and the insulin dose may require a consultation. On the other hand, COVID-19 pandemic resulted in limited access to health care facilities, including the communication between patients and health care providers. An online or virtual approach should be conducted to reduce face-to-face consultation. [6] There are many terminologies that are interchangeable such as telehealth and telemedicine [15] and it seems to be applicable for diabetes education during the COVID-19 pandemic. [6] Telehealth is a broader spectrum of distance health care services, including telemedicine, tele-education, and teletherapy. [16] Telemedicine includes specific diagnostic and monitoring using remote monitoring, video conference for physical examination, or medical test using remote devices (i.e., electronic stethoscopes, tele-ophthalmoscopes, video otoscopes, etc.). [17] Tele-education includes delivering information to the learner using synchronized or unsynchronized method in the form of text, audio, or video mode. [18] Teletherapy means replacement or complement of clinical treatment by increasing the access to the health provider who can guide the clinical practice from the distance such as by conducting teletherapy for aphasia among stroke patient. [19] A digital health services include the use of health information technology, telehealth, and medical apps and wearable devices. [20] The limited information on the application of digital health services among patients with diabetes requires a new knowledge for this point of view. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the recent approach of digital health services among diabetic patients during COVID-19 pandemic. A scoping review was applied to collect the broader information of the latest evidence about the digital health services for diabetes patients. [21] The methodological framework for scoping review consisted of 5 stages; identify the research question; identify relevant studies; study selection; extracting the data; summarizing, and reporting the data. [6, 22] Literature searching was conducted in three electronic databases; PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, from August 28 to September 14, 2020. The keywords and Boolean operators were used as below: diabetes AND digital service OR telemedicine OR technology AND COVID-19. The inclusion criteria of the study were defined as scientific publications in English such as original research and reviews, and starting from early 2020, when the COVID-19 occurred. The commentary reports, letters to editor, and conference abstracts will be excluded. At the beginning, the duplicated items were removed and then, the articles were screened by its title and abstract. The eligibility was determined using inclusion and exclusion criteria. All in all, there were 6 articles included for qualitative review [ Figure 1 ]. All the steps were guided by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard. The selected articles were gathered in a worksheet table. Data extraction was compiled based on author, country, research design, research finding, and other specific considerations. All the included articles were summarized on the table of extraction. It contents the authors, titles, study designs, settings, results, and specific finding of practical consideration. Practical consideration was added to explore further information to enrich the effectiveness of digital health services for diabetes management during the self-confinement of COVID-19 pandemic. Methodological characteristics of the articles evaluated quantitatively and presented in percentage Table 1 . The included articles were published in the Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics (50%, n = 3), the Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews (33,33%, n = 2) and Acta Diabetologica (16,67%, n = 1). The majority of included articles are from the USA. Half of the findings (50%, n = 3) discussed about the use of CGM through virtual education approach. Other recommendations were the need of advanced telemedicine among limited skills on digital use for patients and accessibility of Internet. Most articles (66, 67%, n = 4) presented the vulnerable diabetes patients who may experience emergency complication such as hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis. Thus, closed observation and consultation to understand the CGM data were required. The articles from India [23] and Brazil [25] highlighted the alternative of telemedicine using simple communication tools such as television, radio, or social media that can access widely. One article suggests the use of teleservice in a specific domain of diabetes management. Summary of the findings was available in Table 1 . The table covered the information about authors, title, research design, results, specific findings and practical consideration for the included articles. Development of digital health implies that in dealing with diabetes there is a demand to establish a standard as guidance. Standard of digital health technology should fulfill aspects of functionality, contextually, effectiveness, and economic efficiency. [28] Level of evidence in functional aspects divided into three levels. Level 1 is noticed when there is no direct user benefit such as electronic health records that can be connected to the wards and emergency room. Level 2 is noticed when the information related to healthy living and illness prevention behaviors is provided. At this level, digital health service may provide information; do monitoring, and conduct two ways communication. Level 3A refers to the use of digital health service in preventing and managing diseases by self-management behavior with measurable patient's outcome. Level 3B, which the most advanced medical device takes role in treating, activating, monitoring, calculating and diagnosing the patient. In summary classification of digital health technology described in Table 2 . [28] Besides functional aspects, contextual aspects should also be contemplated among the vulnerable population such as children and elderly who have limited digital literation. Adding to that, digital health service should provide factual information and clinical judgment to prevent misdiagnosis. This approach could support health care professional deliver their practical treatment. [29] Hence, to anticipate the contextual issue even in low digital skill of patient, legal and ethical consideration of digital health service should be declared by the national government in the following country. It also relates to economic consideration when the higher level functional digital health service the higher cost should be spent to cover the budget impact, cost utility, and cost consequences. [30] Validating digital health products requires a complex domain which is time-consuming during its development process. There are 4 domains to construct the rigor of digital health known as digital health scorecard. [31] The first domain is technical to ensure the precision of the device of the digital product as valid as the gold standard of clinical examination. Technical validation was also constructed by security and interoperability aspects. The examples of technical validation of CGM in diabetes management that the device could check the blood glucose accurately, easily transfer to the health care provider, safely encrypted and provide data privacy for the patient. [32] The second is clinical aspect to make sure the digital health product feasible in real-world settings. In this stage, there will be critical appraisal of the simulation to determine a true clinical judgment. [33] An example of clinical validation in diabetes mobile apps using Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) scoring to determine whether the application is good acceptable or poor acceptable. [34] The third domain is usability, to define when the feature of digital health met the needs of consumers (diabetes patients or health care providers). The best example of usability validation in CGM is calculation of high and low glucose scores, user's experiences, and patch attachment adherence. [35] The last domain is about the cost or amount of price that consumers should pay to get access to a digital health service or product. In some diabetes apps, it is low cost and somehow it is free of charge. In the beginning, advanced technology such as CGM devices will be quite Ghosh et al. [23] (2020) India Telemedicine for diabetes care in India during COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdown period: Guidelines for physicians. India government suggested video mode to replace face-to-face consultation at the first consultation, this approach cannot replace the nature of physical examination. The limited resources and digital skills among the patients impact the use of video consultation might be accessed only through smartphones using WhatsApp® and Facetime®. General role: Video mode should be recommended for the first-time consultation; consultation fee will be charged; the narcotic drugs cannot be prescribed. Physical examination can be conducted through video such as simple neurological deficit, and by taking a photograph for issues of visible abscess and wound. Health education: mandatory hygiene to prevent COVID-19, individualized diet; follow up blood glucose, and albumin; insulin and medication adjustment, physical exercise more likely aerobic or yoga. Specific conditions for face-to-face consultation during lockdown (gestational diabetes, a part of infection COVID-19 needs IV antibiotic, diabetes with acute complication, foot infection, new T1D) may be applicable. Peter and Garg [24] (2020) USA The silver lining to COVID-19: Avoiding diabetic ketoacidosis admissions with telehealth. The use of CGM with "share" feature was effective to manage acute condition such as ketosis and hyperglicemia among two adult T1D patients. Diabetes ketoacidosis could be well managed virtually using CGM shared blood glucose monitoring data monitoring. The finding presented the use of Clarity Software and the ''Share'' feature report the patient's CGM data to the health care provider. Using the software, health care providers could adjust the insulin dose and prevent further DKA complication. Filho et al. [25] (2020) Brazil Knowledge levels among elderly people with diabetes mellitus concerning COVID-19: an educational intervention via a teleservice. Total of 30 elderly participants, mostly women (76.7%) and married (63.3%), with the average age was 69.96±4.46 years. Due to limited health literacy through an online system, information aboutCOVID-19 among elderly patients with diabetes was inadequate. Most of the information was accessed through televisions, radios, and social media with the lowest grade of trustworthiness. The role of teleservice using phone calls suggested as the easiest approach to correct the misleading information from social media. The lowest level of digital literacy among elderly is the biggest barrier in the delivery of health services. The government should officially check information related to COVID-19 before it spreads out through TV and radio. The strategy of using phone calls for elderly may be feasible, but the volume and the clarity of the voice should be adequate for elderly with hearing problems. Vigersky et al. [26] (2020) USA The Effectiveness of virtual training on the MiniMedTM670 g system in people with T1D during the COVID-19 pandemic Quasi experimental design CGM training was held virtually by zoom could improve patient satisfaction in using MiniMedTM 670G as a blood glucose monitoring device. The virtual training reduced the use of auto mode significantly from 14±7 days to 11±5 days. Panzirer [27] (2020) USA Contd... expensive. In future, this cost will be paid congruence with a better quality of care. [36] Besides the complexity of digital health scorecard, The New Zealand's government releases the minimum requirement of digital, data, and service. [37] In general, digital health service should obey the Health Information Standards Organization (HISO) standards, roadmaps and architecture guidelines. About the security aspects, digital health service should follow the guidance of Health Information Security Framework and Cloud Risk Assessment framework. However, the data should be easily accessed and shared to the authorization stakeholder. The vision of enhancing digital health as a global strategy supported by WHO was explained in a draft shaping the future 2020-2025. [38] Implementing digital health service during endless COVID-19 pandemic is essential. Reshaping formal health services into digital is an urgent need to replace a regular clinic or hospital visit for patients with diabetes. In future, digital health services could save and adjust cost and health care resource-related diabetes consultation. In the countries with limited resources, as the majority of study findings, highlighted the use of digital health level 2. Even with a simple technology could provide a good telehealth system for diabetes. A simple telediabetology could be developed, including observation or screening, documentation and intervention. [39] For observation or screening the scenario is to prepare the hotline services that reachable by patients with diabetes for critical decision making or clinic appointment. Regular visit could be replaced by private consultation through video mode to increase trust between patients and health care providers. It is important that informed consent should be delivered and keep the patient's data privacy. [6] Collecting the data using mobile apps is feasible and make the data more readable. [40] If the apps is not available, the consent could be sent through email and refer the patient to fill form in a link. Telediabetology using phone, email or apps also beneficial for decision making, therapy adjustment, and lifestyle intervention. Individually, health care providers promote personal case management for teleconsultation. For instance, patients may share their results of blood glucose measurement to physicians as evidence to adjust the diabetic medications or insulin doses. Patients with advanced CGM can share their blood glucose charts directly from the smartphone. Intervention to enhance self-management through diabetes education could be conducted by group intervention. Familiar social media such as WhatsApp®, WeChat®, and Line® are useful. WhatsApps® group was effective as a media for intensive diabetes education by involving 203 diabetes patients in Brazil. [41] Educational intervention through Line® was also indicated promising diabetes outcome such as body mass index, insulin demand, and HbA1c among 193 adolescents with T1D in Italy. [42] In China, WeChat® has been widely used for chronic disease management not only diabetes but also hypertension, cancer and coronary disease. [43] Wicaksana et al. [6] Regarding the research finding, there was a gap between developed and developing countries. Based on the article, the use of WhatsApp® and Face time® among diabetes patients during the pandemic was classified in level 2 of digital health technology. [28] It allowed two ways communication between patients/families and health care providers, to inform the patients about general condition and simple monitoring through the video mode feature. That was done even though the current national guideline in India mentioned that the treatment judgment should be based on face-to-face meeting. [23] Finding in Brazil illustrates the use of phone calls as the simplest approach of digital health suitable for a low literacy population such as elderly meanwhile it was combined with health promotion on the television, radio and social media. The approach of phone calls can help health care providers in delivering simple information about the current health issue of COVID-19. The use of phone calls is classified in Level 2. [28] The use of digital health technology in the USA among diabetes patients was familiar. Among T1D patients, the used of CGM to monitor real-time blood glucose and adjust the current dose of insulin was effective to prevent the acute complication such as diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA). [44] The use of CGM with synchronized data sharing makes diabetes educators and clinicians easy to make decisions and fix the patient's problem during the pandemic. This wearable equipment classified at level 3B because it could empower patients and families. The patients and family can do active monitoring, recording the glycemic status day by day, transmit the data to the healthcare, and do early specific diagnosis by reminder feature of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia alarm. [45] Limitation This review highlighted the broader scope of digital health services among diabetes patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some articles explicitly did not provide information about the methodology of research. One article did not explicitly provide the study design and two articles did not inform the number of samples. One article just mentioned very limited samples (n = 2) in case report study. Level 2 of digital health using video mode in social media such as Face time or WhatsApp® is not a formal health system, which cannot guarantee the data security or the cloud management acquisition. The challenge in developing rigor and pragmatic digital health service is predicted to be time-consuming, involving an exhausted collaboration, and would need a sufficient amount of funding. This review highlighted the summary of digital health services for diabetes patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The health care providers and policy makers could use this review as a summary of recommended health delivery care to facilitate diabetic patients during the crisis period of COVID-19. Patients and families may consider this review to advocate their needs of health care access during self-confinement. COVID-19 impact on treatment for chronic illness revealed Impact of diabetes on COVID-19-related in-hospital mortality: A retrospective study from Northern Italy COVID-19 infection in Italian people with diabetes: Lessons learned for our future (an experience to be used) Impact of COVID-19 on routine care for chronic diseases: A global survey of views from healthcare professionals Challenges and opportunities for telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Ideas on spaces and initiatives in the Brazilian context Diabetes management and specific considerations for patients with diabetes during coronavirus diseases pandemic: A scoping review Glycemic characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the United States COVID-19 in people with diabetes: Understanding the reasons for worse outcomes Risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England: A population-based cohort study Admission hyperglycemia and radiological findings of SARS-CoV2 in patients with and without diabetes Acute hyperglycemic crises with coronavirus disease-19: Case reports Guidance on the management of diabetic ketoacidosis in the exceptional circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic Self-management of diabetes mellitus during the Covid-19 pandemic: Recommendations for a resource limited setting Prevention and management of COVID-19 among patients with diabetes: An appraisal of the literature Clinical examination component of telemedicine, telehealth, mHealth, and connected health medical practices Technology meets healthcare: Distance learning and telehealth Education and practice Investigating the utility of teletherapy in individuals with primary progressive aphasia Methods for research evidence synthesis: The scoping review approach Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework Telemedicine for diabetes care in India during COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdown period: Guidelines for physicians The silver lining to COVID-19: Avoiding diabetic ketoacidosis admissions with telehealth Knowledge levels among elderly people with Diabetes Mellitus concerning COVID-19: An educational intervention via a teleservice The effectiveness of virtual training on the minimed 670 g system in people with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 Pandemic Role of non-profit organizations during COVID-19 for diabetes care: Health care inequities and role of virtual specialty clinic Evidence standards framework for digital health Technologies Strategies for digital care of vulnerable patients in a COVID-19 world-keeping in touch Digital health and the challenge of health systems transformation Digital health: A path to validation Improving the clinical value and utility of CGM systems: issues and recommendations: A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group Diabetes digital app technology: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group Mobile apps for the management of diabetes Performance and usability of three systems for continuous glucose monitoring in direct comparison Cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring for adults with type 1 diabetes compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose: The DIAMOND randomized trial digital-health-sectorarchitecture-standards-and-governance/digital-data-andtechnology-services-minimum-requirements Draft global strategy on digital health Application of telemedicine in diabetes care: The time is now Developing mobile application for predicting risk of cardiovascular event among people with diabetes: Design and pilot study Educational intervention using WhatsApp on medication adherence in hypertension and diabetes patients: A randomized clinical trial Chat line for adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A useful tool to improve coping with diabetes: A 2-year follow-up study The value of WeChat application in chronic diseases management in China Type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: A position statement by the American Diabetes Association Vaccine against arteriosclerosis: An update The authors would express the gratitude to Putu Ayu Yunita Yastini for her contribution to proofread this manuscript. NKDP and ALW designed the study method. NKDP was responsible for articles searching, screening, selection, and process of eligibility checking. ALW contributed in assessing the eligibility of the studies. The first draft of the manuscript was written by NKDP and then ALW reviewed the manuscript. All authors agreed and were responsible for the publication. Nil. There are no conflicts of interest.