key: cord-0979321-xwylastu
authors: Okuno, Daisuke; Kido, Takashi; Muramatsu, Keiji; Tokutsu, Kei; Moriyama, Sakiko; Miyamura, Takuto; Hara, Atsuko; Ishimoto, Hiroshi; Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki; Miyazaki, Taiga; Sakamoto, Noriho; Obase, Yasushi; Ishimatsu, Yuji; Fujino, Yoshihisa; Yatera, Kazuhiro; Matsuda, Shinya; Mukae, Hiroshi
title: Impact of Corticosteroid Administration within 7 Days of the Hospitalization for Influenza Pneumonia with Respiratory Failure: A Propensity Score Analysis Using a Nationwide Administrative Database
date: 2021-01-31
journal: J Clin Med
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030494
sha: 962f231963e50777ac9e3c7459dc4386e2599e70
doc_id: 979321
cord_uid: xwylastu

Influenza pneumonia, which causes acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure, has no established management protocol. Recently, corticosteroid therapy was used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 with respiratory failure; however, its effectiveness as a treatment for influenza pneumonia remains controversial. To investigate the impact of corticosteroid therapy for the early phase of severe influenza pneumonia, we compared influenza pneumonia patients with respiratory failure treated with or without corticosteroids within 7 days after hospital admission using a Japanese nationwide administrative database. The primary endpoint was the mortality rate. The secondary endpoints were duration of intensive-care unit management, invasive mechanical ventilation, and hospital stay. The inverse probability weighting method with estimated propensity scores was used to minimize the data collection bias. We included 3519 patients with influenza pneumonia with respiratory failure. Of these, 875 were treated with corticosteroids. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding 30-day and 90-day mortality, duration of intensive-care unit management, invasive mechanical ventilation, and hospital stay. However, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the corticosteroid group. The use of systematic corticosteroid therapy in patients with influenza pneumonia was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate.

The influenza virus is a common pathogen causing upper respiratory tract symptoms, high fever, chills, and myalgia. Occasionally, it can cause severe disease with reported 2 of 10 fatality rates ranging from 17.4% to 46% in different countries during the A/H1N1 2009 pandemic [1] . Dysregulated systemic inflammation is associated with disease severity and can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and/or multiple organ failure, leading to a poor prognosis [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] .

The management of severe influenza has not been established. Systemic corticosteroid therapy could inhibit excessive inflammatory cytokine production and improve critical illness prognosis, even in infectious diseases [8] . The clinical efficacy of systemic corticosteroid therapy was shown in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with respiratory failure [15] , renewing the attention to its efficacy in severe viral pneumonia. For patients with severe influenza, retrospective and observational studies have found no benefit for corticosteroid therapy when assessing the mortality rate [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] , with 39.9% to 70.8% of patients treated with corticosteroids [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] .

Here, we investigated evidence from clinical practice on the use and effectiveness of corticosteroid therapy within 7 days from admission for influenza pneumonia patients with respiratory failure, using the Diagnostic Procedure Combination (DPC), a Japanese nationwide administrative database. We employed the inverse probability weighting (IPW) method with estimated propensity scores to minimize the bias introduced by baseline characteristics of retrospectively collected data on the corticosteroid and non-corticosteroid groups [26] [27] [28] [29] .

We used the DPC database to investigate the effectiveness of corticosteroid treatment for influenza pneumonia with respiratory failure. All data in the DPC database were gathered by the DPC research group, which receives funding from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. The DPC is a Japanese case-mix patient classification system launched in 2002 for payment management and modernization of the healthcare system [30] . It covered approximately 80% of all acute care inpatient hospitalizations in Japan in 2019 and was used to evaluate treatment effects and complications [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] . The database contains the following details: patient age, sex, diagnosis, comorbidities at admission and during hospitalization (coded following the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision; ICD-10), state of consciousness according to the Japan Coma Scale (JCS), medical procedures, medications, intensive-care unit (ICU) admission, interventional procedures (including hemodialysis, mechanical ventilation, and heart-lung medicine), length of hospital stay, and discharge status (including in-hospital deaths) [30, 33] . The requirement for informed consent was waived because any personally identifiable information was removed from the extracted data and because of the retrospective nature of the study. This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Medical Research, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan and conducted according to guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Influenza pneumonia with respiratory failure was defined as influenza pneumonia (ICD-10 code J10.0 or J11.0) or influenza (ICD-10 code J10.1 or J10.8) with ARDS (J80), and using either oxygen therapy, nasal high flow oxygen therapy (NHF), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) within 7 days from admission. The data of patients admitted between April 2016 and March 2018 who met the criteria were extracted from the DPC database. The data were divided into the corticosteroid and non-corticosteroid groups. The patients who received intravenous (IV) or oral corticosteroids (betamethasone sodium phosphate, cortisone acetate, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, fludrocortisone acetate, hydrocortisone sodium succinate, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, or triamcinolone) within 7 days from admission were included in the corticosteroid group.

The following factors were used as variables: age (in years), sex, advanced treatment hospital (hospitals required to provide advance medical care, most of which are university hospitals), emergency admission, emergency transport, home healthcare, hospital volume (number of patients who met the inclusion criteria between April 2016 and March 2018, pregnancy, smoking, diagnosis of asthma, cancer, cardiovascular disease (diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction, cardiac valvular disease, cardiomyopathy, or pulmonary embolism), cerebrovascular disease (diagnosed as cerebral hemorrhage subarachnoid hemorrhage, or cerebral infarction), chronic kidney disease, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, liver dysfunction (diagnosed as hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, or liver failure), neurological dysfunction (JCS score at admission of ≥100 (indicating a response by closing eyes, no verbal response, and movement in response to pain [33] . Though the DPC data does not include the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), a JCS score of 100 is approximately equal to GCS E1V1M5)), heart failure, hypertension, interstitial lung diseases, medication use (albumin, antithrombin III, heparin, immunoglobulin, insulin, transfusion of platelets or red blood cells, recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM), sivelestat, vasopressors, oseltamivir, zanamivir, laninamivir, peramivir, azithromycin (IV or oral), clarithromycin, erythromycin (IV or oral), carbapenem (IV), cephalosporin (1st-4th generation, IV), clindamycin (IV), minocycline (IV), metronidazole (oral), new quinolone (IV or oral), penicillin antibiotics (IV), anti-MRSA drug (IV)), emergency hemodialysis or maintenance hemodialysis, ECMO, number of IMV days, NPPV, oxygen therapy, use of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX), and ICU admission within 7 days from hospital admission.

The primary endpoint was set as mortality (in-hospital mortality, 30 day-mortality, and 90 day-mortality). The secondary endpoints were the durations through the entire hospitalization period of ICU management, mechanical ventilation, and hospital stay.

The propensity score was calculated by a logistic model with baseline variables that could affect the administration of corticosteroids, including all variables described above. The C-statistic (area under the operating characteristic curve) was employed to evaluate the goodness of fit. These methods were conducted using IBM SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Then, we adjusted the covariates and evaluated the outcomes between the corticosteroid and non-corticosteroid groups by the inverse probability weighting method [33, 36, 38] . The covariates before adjustment were evaluated using the chi-squared (χ 2 ) test for categorical variables and the unpaired t-test for continuous variables. These methods were conducted using STATA/IC 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Differences with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant in all tests.

A flow chart of influenza pneumonia patient selection is shown in Figure 1 . The data of 5357 patients with influenza pneumonia or influenza with ARDS were extracted from the DPC database as described in the Methods. Of these, 1838 patients without respiratory failure were excluded, while 3519 patients were found eligible for this study. Of these 3519 patients, 875 (24.8%) were treated with corticosteroids within 7 days from admission, and 2644 (75.2%) were not. In the corticosteroid group, 86 patients received high-dose corticosteroid treatment (intravenous administration of methylprednisolone at a dose of >500 mg/day for >1 day), 679 received other intravenous corticosteroids, and 288 received oral corticosteroids. There was partial overlap among these. 2644 (75.2%) were not. In the corticosteroid group, 86 patients received high-dose corticosteroid treatment (intravenous administration of methylprednisolone at a dose of >500 mg/day for >1 day), 679 received other intravenous corticosteroids, and 288 received oral corticosteroids. There was partial overlap among these. Subsequently, we used the IPW method with estimated propensity scores, and the C-statistic of the propensity score was 0.787. The baseline characteristics of patients before and after they were adjusted for confounders are presented in Table 1 . Before adjustment, the baseline variables of age, advanced treatment hospital, emergency admission, home healthcare, asthma, cerebrovascular disease, chronic respiratory failure, COPD, liver dysfunction, heart failure, hypertension, interstitial pneumonia, albumin, antithrombin III, heparin, immunoglobulin, insulin, platelet transfusion, red cell transfusion, rhTM, sivelestat administration, vasopressor, zanamivir, peramivir, azithromycin (IV), clarithromycin, carbapenem, new quinolone (IV), IMV days, NPPV, oxygen therapy, PMX, and ICU management differed significantly between the groups. After adjusting for confounders, the patient baseline characteristics in the two groups were similar across these variables, except for liver dysfunction, which remained significantly different. Table 1 . Baseline characteristics of patients treated with or without corticosteroids before and after adjusting for confounders using the propensity score weighting method.

Before Subsequently, we used the IPW method with estimated propensity scores, and the C-statistic of the propensity score was 0.787. The baseline characteristics of patients before and after they were adjusted for confounders are presented in Table 1 . Before adjustment, the baseline variables of age, advanced treatment hospital, emergency admission, home healthcare, asthma, cerebrovascular disease, chronic respiratory failure, COPD, liver dysfunction, heart failure, hypertension, interstitial pneumonia, albumin, antithrombin III, heparin, immunoglobulin, insulin, platelet transfusion, red cell transfusion, rhTM, sivelestat administration, vasopressor, zanamivir, peramivir, azithromycin (IV), clarithromycin, carbapenem, new quinolone (IV), IMV days, NPPV, oxygen therapy, PMX, and ICU management differed significantly between the groups. After adjusting for confounders, the patient baseline characteristics in the two groups were similar across these variables, except for liver dysfunction, which remained significantly different. Table 1 . Baseline characteristics of patients treated with or without corticosteroids before and after adjusting for confounders using the propensity score weighting method.

Before Data are presented as the % or mean ± (standard error). Groups were adjusted using the propensity score weighting method. Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ICU, intensive-care unit; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; iv, intravenous administration; JCS, Japan Coma Scale; NHF, nasal high flow oxygen therapy; NPPV, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; oral, oral administration; PMX, polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column; rhTM, recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin.

The results of the primary and secondary endpoints of patients treated with or without corticosteroids as assessed by the IPW method with the estimated propensity score are shown in Table 2 . Although there was no difference in 30-day mortality (14.52% vs. 13.38%, p = 0.454) and 90-day mortality (18.43% vs. 15.08%, p = 0.054), the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group (19.21% vs. 15.36%, p = 0.031). There was no difference between the groups throughout hospitalization in durations of ICU management (0.60 ± 0.079 vs. 0.58 ± 0.065 days, p = 0.857), IMV (2.13 ± 0.23 vs. 2.39 ± 0.23 days, p = 0.373), and hospital stay (19.90 ± 1.07 vs. 19.38 ± 0.44 days, p = 0.649). To account for multiple testing, we performed the Hochberg's test with a false discovery rate of 0.10 [39] , and the results were unchanged. Data are presented as the % or mean (standard error). Groups were adjusted using the propensity score weighting method. Abbreviations: ICU, intensive-care unit; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; SE, standard error.

The management of severe influenza pneumonia with or without ARDS has not been established, and the efficacy of early corticosteroid therapy remains unclear. Following the recent favorable outcome of corticosteroid therapy for COVID-19 with respiratory failure, much attention has been given to its efficacy when treating severe viral pneumonia. In the present study, we investigated clinical practice evidence of the use and effectiveness of corticosteroid therapy in a study of 3519 influenza pneumonia patients with respiratory failure using the Japanese nationwide administrative database. Surprisingly, a quarter of the patients (875/3519, 24.8%) received systemic corticosteroid therapy within 7 days from hospital admission. Previous studies have reported that adjuvant corticosteroid therapy was used in 39.9% to 69.0% of patients with severe influenza pneumonia requiring ICU management or mechanical ventilation [19] [20] [21] 24, 25] . In this study, although we included relatively mild cases that only required oxygen therapy, 24.8% of the patients were treated with corticosteroids, suggesting that corticosteroid therapy is commonly used for influenza pneumonia with respiratory failure.

However, the rate of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group (19.21% vs. 15.36%, p = 0.031) after adjusting for confounders by the IPW method, using the estimated propensity score. In a previous study on pH1N1 pneumonia with acute respiratory failure that required admission to the ICU, no differences in mortality were noted between patients who received corticosteroids and those who did not (18.38% vs. 17.37%, p = 0.806) [17] . Corticosteroid therapy was also associated with a higher mortality rate in patients with pH1N1 infection admitted to the ICU (54% vs. 31%, p = 0.004) [20] and in patients with severe respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (33.7% vs. 16 .8%, p = 0.004) [21] . A meta-analysis also showed that corticosteroid therapy was related to a higher mortality rate (odds ratio 1.98, 95% CI: 1.62-2.43; p < 0.001) [1] . In our results, corticosteroid therapy did not affect the duration of ICU management, IMV, or hospital stay. It was shown that corticosteroid therapy had unfavorable effects in patients with pH1N1-related critical illness requiring ICU admission. The ICU management duration was 13.5 vs. 8.8 days, mechanical ventilation was 13.3 vs. 9.6 days, and hospital stay was 30.8 vs. 18.4 days [20] . In a meta-analysis, corticosteroid treatment was associated with longer ICU management (weighted mean differences 4.78, 95% CI: 2.27-7.29, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation (weighted mean differences 3.82, 95% CI: 1.49-6.15, p = 0.001) [1] . Collectively, our results and those of previous studies suggest that corticosteroid therapy does not have favorable effects on the mortality rate, duration of ICU management, IMV days, or the length of hospital stay.

Thirty-day mortality was not different, and 90-day mortality was higher in the corticosteroid group, although there was no statistically significant difference. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group. These results suggest that corticosteroids have a negative effect on a longer mortality period, because the in-hospital mortality has a longer prognosis than 30-day and 90-day mortality. This might be explained by complications arising from long-term corticosteroid therapy, including hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or invasive fungal infections [19] [20] [21] 40] . Corticosteroid therapy influences immune cells such as macrophages and granulocytes that protect the host from bacteria, thus increasing the incidence of infections [41] . Kim et al. reported that patients receiving corticosteroid therapy for influenza pneumonia more frequently developed secondary bacterial pneumonia (57% vs. 22%) and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (4% vs. 0%) than patients receiving non-corticosteroid therapy [20] . Martin-Loeches et al. and Brun-Buisson et al. also demonstrated that corticosteroid therapy was associated with a higher incidence of pneumonia than non-corticosteroid therapy (26.2% vs. 13.8% and 41.0% vs. 26.4%, respectively) [19, 21] . Furthermore, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii were often identified as the pathogens causing hospital-acquired pneumonia in patients treated with corticosteroids for severe influenza pneumonia [19] , suggesting that corticosteroid therapy increases the risk of contracting an opportunistic and refractory infection. Some experimental data on influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus have also shown that corticosteroid therapy might prolong viral clearance and create a suitable environment for expanded viral replication, subsequently leading to a higher plasma viral load [16, [42] [43] [44] .

This study has limitations similar to those of previous studies using the DPC database [31] [32] [33] 45] . First, it was an observational retrospective study without randomization. Although adjusting the baseline characteristic differences using the IPW method with the estimated propensity score reduced the effect of this limitation, there might still be confounders that we were unable to evaluate with the DPC database and could have influenced the outcome. Examples of such confounders are vital signs, laboratory findings, radiological findings, and mechanical ventilation settings. Second, we showed that 86 patients received high-dose corticosteroid treatment, 679 patients received other intravenous corticosteroids, and 288 patients received oral corticosteroids. More detailed information on the dosage of corticosteroids is difficult to estimate because of its complexity. Third, the influence of secondary bacterial pneumonia is unknown because microbial etiology is not included in the DPC database. Fourth, we cannot exclude the influence of the different virus types on the clinical outcome, as this information is not included in the DPC database. However, information regarding the popular influenza virus type during each season in Japan is available in the database of the Japanese National Institute of Infectious Diseases (https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/en/influenza-e.html). According to the data presented in this database, the A/H1, A/H3, and B rates were 4%, 78%, and 18% in years 2016/2017 (September 2016 to August 2017), and 23%, 32%, and 45% in years 2017/2018 (September 2017 to August 2018), respectively. Thus, we believe that A/H1, A/H3, and B were the major virus types present in our study (data analyzed from April 2016 to March 2018). Despite these limitations, this study has the major advantage of using a large dataset for corticosteroid therapy efficacy evaluation.

We provided clinical practice evidence on the usage and effectiveness of corticosteroid therapy by analyzing the data of 3519 influenza pneumonia patients with respiratory failure with using a Japanese nationwide administrative database. A quarter of the patients (875/3519, 24.8%) received corticosteroid therapy within 7 days from admission, which was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate. Although this observational retrospective study has some limitations, it has benefited from using a large dataset to investigate the actual use and effects of corticosteroid therapy in patients with influenza pneumonia with respiratory failure. Institutional Review Board Statement: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical Research, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan (registration number R2-007).

Informed Consent Statement: Patient consent was waived due to study using database, removing any personally identifiable information.

All authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Corticosteroids for the treatment of human infection with influenza virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand

Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States

H1N1 influenza A virus-associated acute lung injury: Response to combination oseltamivir and prolonged corticosteroid treatment

Fatal outcome of human influenza A (H5N1) is associated with high viral load and hypercytokinemia

Th1 and Th17 hypercytokinemia as early host response signature in severe pandemic influenza

Cytokine and chemokine response in children with the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection

What is the role of steroids in pneumonia therapy?

Adjunct prednisone therapy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Effect of corticosteroids on treatment failure among hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high inflammatory response: A randomized clinical trial

Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: Results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Study

Use of corticosteroids in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Corticosteroid therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia: A meta-analysis

Corticosteroids in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: A metaanalysis

Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19-Preliminary Report

Impact of corticosteroid treatment and antiviral therapy on clinical outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplant patients infected with influenza virus

Corticosteroid therapy in patients with primary viral pneumonia due to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza

Chinese Critical Care Clinical Trial, G. Hospitalized adult patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Beijing, China: Risk factors for hospital mortality

Use of early corticosteroid therapy on ICU admission in patients affected by severe pandemic (H1N1)v influenza A infection

Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine, H.N.C. Corticosteroid treatment in critically ill patients with pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 infection: Analytic strategy using propensity scores

Early corticosteroids in severe influenza A/H1N1 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome

Adjuvant Corticosteroid Treatment in Adults With Influenza A (H7N9) Viral Pneumonia

Impact of corticosteroid treatment on clinical outcomes of influenza-associated ARDS: A nationwide multicenter study

Critically Ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico

Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) infection in Canada

The efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with interstitial lung diseases complicated with polymyositis or dermatomyositis

Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology

Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study

The impact of trauma-center care on mortality and function following pelvic ring and acetabular injuries

Development of Case Mix Based Evaluation System in Japan

Variation in cancer surgical outcomes associated with physician and nurse staffing: A retrospective observational study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database

Mortality and morbidity after high-dose methylprednisolone treatment in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury: A propensity-matched analysis using a nationwide administrative database

Postoperative polymyxin B hemoperfusion and mortality in patients with abdominal septic shock: A propensity-matched analysis

The relationship between high-dose corticosteroid treatment and mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective and observational study using a nationwide administrative database in Japan

Efficacy of Antimicrobial Catheters for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Acute Cerebral Infarction

Efficacy of early sivelestat administration on acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

Low-dose corticosteroids during severe community-acquired pneumonia: End of the story

Impact of Corticosteroids on Mortality in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance

Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock

Compartmentalized cytokine production within the human lung in unilateral pneumonia

Effects of early corticosteroid treatment on plasma SARS-associated Coronavirus RNA concentrations in adult patients

Altered pathogenesis of porcine respiratory coronavirus in pigs due to immunosuppressive effects of dexamethasone: Implications for corticosteroid use in treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus

Inhibition of the cytokine response does not protect against lethal H5N1 influenza infection

Continuous regional arterial infusion for acute pancreatitis: A propensity score analysis using a nationwide administrative database